it was resolved that when one hath a power of revocation yet if he suffer any thing to be lawfully executed as touching that he cannot make any revocation as if a man make a Letter of Attourney to another to doe any thing before Execution he may revoke it but after Execution lawfully done it cannot be revoked if one to whom another is indebted be Outlawed and he that oweth the money payeth it to the King and the Outlary is after reversed yet the Creditor shall recover his Debt against the party if the goods of an Outlawed person be sold by the Sheriffe upon a cap. utlagat ' after the Outlary is reversed by Error the Defendant shall have restitution of his goods for the Sheriffe or Escheator is not compellable to sell the goods but he may keepe them to the use of the King agreeing to the Booke 20. Eliz. Dyer 363. but if a Sheriffe by vertue of a Fieri facias sell the goods and after the judgement be reversed by error the Defendant shall not have restitution of the goods but the value of them for which they were sould And the reason is the Sheriffe is compellable to Levy the Debt of the goods of the Defendant and therefore great reason that the Sale should stand Semaynes case 2. Jac. fo 91. Banco regis THat the House of every man is to him as his Castle and Fortresse as well for his defence against injuries and violence as for his repose that if a man kill another in his defence or permisfortune without any intent yet it is felony and he should loose his goods and Chattells for the great regard that the Law hath to the life of a man But if Theeves come to the House of a man to rob or murther and the owner or his servant kill any of the Theeves in defence of him or his House this is not felony neyther shall he loose any thing any man may assemble his Neighbours or friends to Guard his House against violence but he may not assemble them to goe with him to the Market or abroad to safe-gaurd him against violence and the reason of all this is Domus sua cuique est tutissimum refugium It is resolved that when any House is recovered by any reall Action or by Ejectione firmae the Sheriffe may breake the House and deliver seisin or possession It was also resolved that in all cases where the King is party the Sheriffe may breake the House if the Doores be shut and make Execution of his Writ but before he breake the House he ought to signifie the cause of his comming and make request to have the Doores opened West 1. ca. 17. which Act is but an affirmance of the common Law but if the Officer breake the House when he might have the Doores opened he is a Trespassor 41 Ass pl. 35. For fellony or suspition of fellony the Officer may breake open the Doore in all Cases where the Door is open the Sheriffe may enter and make Execution of his writ either for body or goods at the suite of a subject or the Lord may distraine for his rent But it was resolved that the Sheriffe at the Suite of a common person upon request made to open the Doors and denyall thereof ought not to breake open the Doore or the House to Execute any processe at the Suite of any Subject or to execute a Fieri facias being a Writ of Execution but he is a Trespassor yet if he doe Execution in the House it is good in the Law being done it was also resolved that the house of a man is not a Castle or defence for any other person but for the owner his Family and goods and not to protect another that flyeth into the same or the goods of another for then the Sheriffe upon request and denyall may breake the House and doe Execution And this is proved by the Statute of West 1. ca. 17. whereby is declared that the Sheriffe may breake the House or the Castle to make replevin when the goods of another that he hath destrayned are conveyed away to prevent the owner but in this case the Sheriffe must demand the goods first Barwicks Case 39. Eliz. in Exchequer fo 93. THe Queene 28. Die Julij Anno. 26. demised the Mannor of Sutton to Humfrey Barwicktenend sibi a die confectionis It was resolved that the same 28. day of July is excluded and the demise began the 29. of July It was also resolved that an estate of freehold cannot commence In futuro but ought to take effect presently in possession Reversion or Remainder A Lease for yeares may commence in future but not a Lease for life and the reason is for that a Lease for yeares may be made without livery and seisin but an estate of freehold may not be made without livery eyther in deed or in Law and therefore when a man maketh a Lease for Life to commence at a day to come he cannot make a present Livery to a future estate and therefore in this case nothing passeth and it is all one whither it commenceth at a day to come or yeares to come for the distance of the times doth not make alteration in this Case but in the case of two joynt Lessees the Livery made to one is good in the name of both for they have an interest in the Land before their entry and livery to one in the name of both maketh an actuall possession in both which is sufficient to support the remainder to a third person in Fee Vide Claytons ' Case in the Fifth Booke Lycense to occupy Land for one yeare is a Lease for one yeare 5. H. 7. 1. in consideration of a former demise to be surrendered which was false and void is a void consideration as to the Queene Goodalls case 40. El. Banco Regis fol. 95. COnditions for payment of money touching inheritance ought to be truly performed and not covenous if they concerne a third person The Law doth not finde an assignee in Law where there is an assignee in fact Expressum facit cessare tacitum affirmed in the Exchequer chamber upon Error there brought Countesse of Northumberlands case 40. El. Communi Banco fol. 97. FItton and the Countesse of Northumberland his wife Sir Thomas Cecill Knight and Dorothie his wife William Cornewalleys and Lucy his wife and the Lady Davers Daughters and heires of the Lord Latimer brought a Quare impedit against Hall who pleaded a release of William Cornewalleys pendente breve and it was adjudged that this should but goe in barre onely against William Cornewalleys and his wife and the Writt should stand for others and all shall vest in the others because intire and in the realty presentment of the lessor and lessee is not double for the lessors onely traversable Buries case 40. El. in communi banco fol. 98. BEtween Whebster and Burie in Ejectione firmae a speciall verdict was given upon divorce between Burie and his wife
life his heire shall not be in ward although he be within age by that Statute because he is not immediate heire Sondayes Case 8. Jacobi fol. 127. M. S. deviseth to his Wife for life the remainder to W. S. and if he shall have issue that then his issue shall have it the remainder to S. the remainder to T. c. Totidem verbis upon condition that if any of them or this heires of their bodies goe about to alien that he in the next remainder to enter after the death of M. W. and S. T. suffereth a common recovery to his owne use in fee he in the next remainder enters 1. Resol Every one of the Sonnes hath an estate taile 1. These words if he dye without issue Male are sufficient to create an estate taile 2. The generall clause if any of his Sons or heires of his body doe it maketh it manifest 3. The condition proveth it for they cannot alien if they have but for life for this would be a forfeiture 2. The restraint of tenant in taile to suffer a common recovery is voyd See Mildmayes Case in the sixth Book Quicks Case 9. Jacobi fol. 129. THe King Lord I. N. and Tho. Q. mesnes of a Mannor which they hold in common in Capite and tenant of three Acres holden in Chivalry T. Q. maketh a feoffment of his moity to the use of himselfe for life the remainder to I. Q. his Son in taile the tenant infeoffeth I. Q. who infeoffeth T. Q. to defraud I. N. of the wardship of his Sonne within age and dyes I. N. seiseth the Son T. Q. dyeth the King shall not have wardship of the body and moity of the three Acres 1. Resol By the death of I. Q. it was a Chattell vested in I. N. and the King had but a possibility to have it if T. Q. dye during the minority of the ward which possibility shall not devest the wardship out of I. N. 2. When the tenant infeoffeth a stranger to defraud the Lord of wardship the Lord shall not have ravishment of ward before recovery of the Land in a right of ward and although the title of I. N. be but in action yet it shall not be devested by a descent after See the Statute of 34. H. 8. in Case of collusion Bewleys Case 9. Jacobi fol. 130. THe King Lord mesne by Socage and tenant the tenant is attainted of Treason the King grants to one tenendum by Chivalry and Rent and to doe his services to other Lords the tenant shall hold by Socage of the mesne and he by Socage of the King because the intent of the King was to revive the mesnalty which cannot be by any other way and the reviving of the ancient tenure shall be in construction preferred before the reservation of a new and the honour of the King shall be preferred before his profit and there was no default in the mesne Thomas Holts Case 9. Jacobi fol. 131. GRandfather tenant in Chivalry in Capite Father and Son the Grandfather conveyeth part of his Lands to the use of the Father and his Wife the remainder to the Son in taile c. the remainder to the right heires of the Grandfather and conveys other Lands to his younger Children for life with diverse remainders over and dyeth the Father tenders livery and before he sueth it dyeth 1. Resol By the death of the Father before livery sued and after tender the King loseth the primer seisin but not meane rates if any be due 2. The Son shall not pay primer seisin nor sue livery because the Father and not he was within the Statute of 32. H. 8. 3. If the King had had one primer seisin he shall not have another of the Lands conveyed to the younger Children but that ought to be an effectuall seisin Ergo here because the King had not the effect of the primer seisin of the Father he shall have primer seisin of the Lands conveyed to the younger Children as if hee had the grant of a prochein avoidance and presents and his Clerk dyeth before Induction he shall present again and before the Statute of Donis If tenant in taile the revertion to the King had aliened post prolem suscitatam with warranty which descends upon the King it is no barr without assets the effect of the warranty 4. The King shall not have primer seisin in regard of a secke revertion which descends to the Son otherwise if a rent be reserved the King may have that for a yeare So note for a fruitlesse revertion there shall be wardship but no primer seisin Matthew Menes Case 9. Jacobi fol. 133. TEnant of the King of a Messuage in Capite who holds other Gavelkinde Land deviseth all to his 4. Sons equally 1. Whether the King shall have a third part of the Messuage onely 2. Whether out of the part of the heire onely because Praerogativa Regis cap. 1. Rex habebit c. De quocunque tenuerint c. is intended if the Land descend to the same heire to whom the Land holden did discende 1. Resolved if no Will had beene made the King shall not have the Lands holden of others in socage but when by the Will to which he is inabled by the Statute he deviseth it to his Sonnes there the saving in 32. H. 8. giveth to the King ward and primer seisin So if Lands in chivalry devisable by custome are devised to the Feme although the devisee be good for all without aide of the Statute yet the King shall have a wardship of a third part 2. The King shall have his third part out of all their Estates equally Ascoughs Case 9. Jacobi fol. 134. THe King Lord Mesne in Capite and Tenant in socage the Mesne grants to the use of himselfe for life the remainder to the Tenant in taile if the remainder suspends the Mesnalty during the life of the Mesne Resolved that during his life the Mesnalty is not suspended 1. Not as to the Mesne because he remaineth Tenant to the Lord nor by reason of the remainder for the avoâ—ding of Fractions otherwise if the remainder be liimitted in fee for then he hath as high an estate in the Mesnalty as in the Tenancy and this can never be revived and otherwise a Seigniory in fee shall issue out of a Mesnalty for life and there will be Lord and Tenant in fee and Mesne for life but if the Lord Grant his Seigniory for yeares the remainder for life to the Tenant the Mesnalty is suspended A Mesnalty or Seigniory cannot be suspended in part and in esse for part by the Act of the party but they may by act of Law or of a third party As if the Lord take a Lease of part of the Tenancy all the Seigniory is suspended but if a Gardian indow the Feme the Seigniory is in esse for that part and suspended for the residue If two Coparceners are of a Seigniory and one commeth to the Tenancy by
house or not When a man maketh a feoffment of a Messuage cum pertinentii he departeth with nothing thereby but that which is parcell of the house as buildings curtelage and gardens If a Lessee for yeares makes a Lease for a certaine Tearme of any parcell and so divides the possession thereof from the residue if of this parcell so severed Liverie be made the possession in the residue by the first lessee is not any impediment to the liverie of this parcell otherwise if a Lessee make a Lease at will of any parcell there his possession of the residue shall hinder the liverie made in this parcell and with this judgement agreed all the other Justices and Serjeants of Serjeants Inne in Fleete-streete Doddingtons Case 27. Eliz. fo 32. KIng H. 8. Ex certa scientia c. granted to A. for 300 l. Omnia illa Messuagia in tenura Johannis Browne Scituate in Well nuper prioratini de W. Spectant ' And in truth the Lands lie in D. in this Case 't was resolved that the grant was voide by the Common Law as well in case of a common person as the King because the grant is generall and is restrained to one certaine Village and the grantee shall not have any Lands out of that Village to which the generallity of the grant is referred for this Pronoune Illa hath his necessary reference as well to the Towne as well as to the Tenure of I. B. for if eyther the one or the other faile the grant is voide And so it was adjudged Per tot cur de Banco Regis Resolved also that this grant was not holpen by the Statute of 34. H. 8. For no grants are holpen by this Statute nor by any act of confirmation but such as comprehend convenient certainty 1. Quia generale nihil certum implicat And here no Tenements are mentioned to be granted because the generall grant being intire was referred to a falsity and therefore it cannot be said that the Towne was misnamed and great inconvenience would follow if c. for the King should be deceived but the Statute helpes when there is a convenient certainty as a Mannor Farme Land knowne by a certaine name or containing so many Acres c. So that it may appeare what things the King intended to passe Note t is the most sure way for the Pattentee to expresse as much as he can in certainty before the generall words SIR Rowland Heywards Case In cur Wardor 37. Eliz. fo 35. SIr Rowland Heyward seised of a Mannor in Demeans and rents in consideration of money doth demise grant Bargaine and sell to A. the said Mannours Lands Tenements and the reversions and remainders with all Rents reserved upon any demise to have and to hold to A. and his asignes after the death of the Lessor for seaventeene yeares rendring a rose the Indenture was inrolled and after the Lessor by Indenture doth Covenant with B. to stand seised of the premises to the use of himselfe and the Heires of his body and no attornment was made to A. The Question was What passed to A and it was resolved by Popham and Anderson chiefe Justices and the Court that A. may have his election eyther to take the same by demise at the common Law or by bargaine and Sale Per Statutum 27. H. 8. without attornment for it was one entire demise and bargaine of one Mannor without any fraction or division thereof and this election remaineth to A. and his Executors and assignes for here is not Election to claime one of two severall things by one Title but to claime one thing by one of the two severall Titles for where the things are severall nothing passeth before Election and the Election must precede but when one thing passeth the Election of the Title may be subsequent For if I. have 3 Horses and doe give to you one of them the property comenceth by Election and must be made in the life of the Parties The Bi of Sarum had a great wood of 1000 Acres called Brerewood and infeoffed another of one House and seaventeene Acres parcell of the Wood and made Liverie in the Wood House nothing passeth of the Wood before Election and the Heire of the feoffee may not make Election Bullocks Case 10. Eliz. Dyer In case where election is given of two several things he which is the primer Agent and that ought to doe the first act shall have alwayes the Election As if a man grant a Rent of twenty Shillings or a Robe the Grantor shall have the Election for he is the primer Agent eyther by paying the one or delivering the other If a man make a Lease rendring twenty shillings or a Robe the Lessee shall have the Election Causa qua supra but if I give unto you one of my Horses in my Stable there you shall have the Election for you are the Primer Agent by taking or seising one of them and so of twenty trees in my Wood. Note for Elections these diversities 1. When nothing passes to the grantee c. before Election there it ought to be made in the life of the Parties but when the Estate passes presently c. the Grantee c his Heire or Executor may elect 2. When the same thing passes and the Donee c. hath Election in what manner c. he will take it the Donee Heire or Executor may elect 3. When Election is given to severall persons the first shall stand 4. When Election is given of two severall things he which ought to doe the first Act shall have Election 5. When the thing granted is annuall and to have continuance there the Election remaines to the Grantor in case where the Law gives him Election as well after the day as before otherwise t is when the thing is to be performed Vnica vice 6. The feoffee c. by his act may forfeit his Election as if A. infeoffe B. of two Acres Habendum the one for life the other in Taile and hee before Election makes a feoffement of both here the feoffor shall enter in which he pleases for the wrong of the feoffee 7. Though the Lessees here enter generally yet they may Elect after so if one be Executor and Devisee of a terme and enters generally c. and after the Lessees in the principall case made Election for to take by bargaine and Sale and had the Rents The Bishop of Winchesters Case 38. El. fo 43. In a prohibition REsolved that at common Law none had capacity to take Tythes but spirituall persons or Persona mixta as the King and regularly no meere Lay man was capable of them except in speciall Cases for he could not sue for them in Court Christian and regularly a lay man had no remedy for them till 32 H. 8. A Lay-Man may be discharged of Tythes at the common Law by grant or by composition but not by prescription for it is commonly said in our Law-Books that a lay man may
the wrong but that the said Bill shall remaine alwayes of record to their infamy and here no murther or piracy can be punished upon any Bill exhibited in English but he ought to have beene indicted and therefore he hath not onely mistaken the Court but also the nature of exhibiting the Bill hath not appearance of any ordinary course of justice but no action lyes upon an appeale of murder returnable in the Common Bench for though the Writ is not returned before competent Judges who may doe justice yet 't is in nature of a lawfull Suite namely by Writ of appeale wherefore judgement was given for the Plaintiffe And in a Writ of error in the Chequer Chamber brought by Wood 't was resolved that Sir R. B. might have had a good action but here because the action was not upon the Bill exhibited at Westminster but because he said in the County of S. that his Bill was true In auditu quamplurimorum without expressing the said matters in particular so that it was not any Slaunder judgement was reversed Stanhopp and Bliths Case 27. of the Queene fo 15. MAster Stanhopp who was a surveyor of the Dutchy and had divers Offices and was a justice of peace Hath but one Mannor and that he hath gotten by swearing and forswearing Resolved that the action doth not lye for they are too generall and words which charge any one in an action in which damages shall be recovered ought to have convenient certainty and he doth not charge the Plaintiffe with swearing c. and he may recover a Mannor by swearing c. yet not procuring or assenting to it Resolved if one charge another that he hath forsworne himselfe no action lyes First because he may be forsworne in usuall communication Quia benignior sensus in verbis generalibus seu dubijs est praeferenda Secondly it is an usuall word of passion and choller as also to call another a Villaine a Rogue or Varlet these and such like will not mayntaine Action Boni judicis interest lites derimere But if one say to another that he is perjured or that he hath forsworne himselfe in such a Court c. For these words an Action will lye Hext Justice of Peace against Yeomans 27. of the Queene fo 15. FOr my ground in H. Hext seekes my life and if I could finde one J. H. I doe not doubt but within two dayes to arrest Hext for suspicion of felony Adjudged that no action lyes for the first words 1. Because he may seeke his life lawfully upon just cause and his land may be holden of him 2. 'T is too generall and the Law inflicts no punishment for seeking of his life but adjudged that the action lyes for the last words for for suspicion of felony he shall be imprisoned and his life in question Birchleys case 27. 28. of the Queene fo 16. THe Defendant said to B. Clerke of the Kings Bench and sworne to deale duely without corruption you are well knowne to be a corrupt man and to deale corruptly Adjudged that the action lyes 1. Because the words Ex causa dicendi imply that he hath dealt corruptly in his profession Et sermo relatus ad personam intelligi debet de conditione personae 1. This touches the Plaintiffe in his oath 2. The words Scandalize him in the duty of his profession by which he gets his living Skinner of London said that Manwood was a corrupt Judge adjudged actionable Resolved in this case that if the precedent parlance had beene that B. was a usurer or executor of another and would not performe the will and upon this the Defendant had spoken the words following no action would lye Weaver and Caridens case 37. of the Queene fo 16. AAjudged that no action lyes for saying that the Plaintiffe was detected for perjury in the Starre-chamber for an honest man may be detected but not convicted Stuckley and Bulheads case 44. and 45. of the Queene fo 16. ADjudged that an action lyes for saying Master St. he was a Justice of peace covereth and hideth felonies and is not worthy to be a Justice of peace for this is against his oath and his office and a good cause to put him out of Commission and for that he may be indicted and fined Snagg and Gees case 39. of the Queene fo 16. THou hast killed my wife and art a traytor Adjudged that the action will not lye for the wife was in life as appeared in the Declaration and so the words vaine and no scandall otherwise if shee had beene dead Eaton and Allens case 40. of the Queene fo 16. HE is a brabler and a quarreller for he gave his Champion counsell to make a Deed of gift of his goods to kill me and then to fly out of the Country but God preserved me Resolved that the action will not lye for the purpose without act is not punishable and though he may be punished for such conspiracy in the Star-chamber yet this is by the absolute power of the Court not by ordinary course of Law Observe well this case and the cause and reason of this Judgement Anne Davies case 35. of the Queene fo 16. THe Defendant said to B. a Suitor to the Plaintiffe and with whom there was neare an agreement of marriage I know Davies daughter well she did dwell in Cheapside and a Grocer did get her with childe and the Plaintiffe declared that by reason thereof the said B. refused to take her to wife Resolved the action lyes for a woman is punishable for a Bastard by 18. of the Queene ca. 3. And though that fornication c. is not examinable by our Law because done in secret and uncomely openly to be examined yet the having a Bastard is apparant and examinable by the said Act. Resolved if the Plaintiffe had been charged with nude incontinency onely the action lyes for the ground of the action is temporall viz. the defeating of her advancement in marriage By Popham an action lyes for saying that a woman Inholder had a great infectious disease by which shee loses her guests Banister and Banisters case 25. of the Queene Resolved that an action lyes for saying to the sonne and heire that he was a Bastard for this tends to his disinherison but resolved if the Defendant pretend that the Plaintiffe is a Bastard and he himselfe right heire no action lyes and this the Defendant may shew by way of barre Jeames case 41. 42. of the Queene fo 17. THe Defendant said to B. Hang him innuendo praedict J he is full of the pox innuendo the French pox c. Resolved two things are requisite to have an action for slander 1. That the person scandalized be certaine 2. That the scandall be apparent by the words themselves And therefore if a man says that one of the servants of B. is a notorious felon or traytor an action lyes not if he have more servants and innuendo cannot make it certain
taile with crosse remainders to J. and K. M. discontinueth and dyeth without issue J. dyeth without issue K. dyeth and her issue brings a Formedon in the remainder and good although severall remainders for they depend upon one estate and commence by gift at one time In actions reall in which title is expressed a man shall not have one Writ for Lands to which he had severall Titles as in escheate cessavit Writ of Mesne c. but he may have a Writ of ward of Land onely although it be by severall Tenures nor one formedon upon two distinct gifts where the foundation is severall but he shall have it if there be one gift although it take effect at severall times because the foundation was joynt and single as upon a gift in taile to Brother and Sister who dye without issue or if the Brother dye without issue and the Sister dye having issue who dyes without issue he to whom the remainder limitted shall have one formedon although it vest at severall times so in an estate taile to Father and Sonne and so here In actions reall founded upon Torte a man shall have one Writ to recover Lands to which he had severall Titles as in an assize a Writ of entry c. but in a Writ of entry upon disseisin made to my Mother and her Sister Coperceners because there title is in the Writ it appeareth he ought to have severall actions but in personall actions one may comprehend severall torts and causes of actions as trespasse for trespasse made at severall dayes and places wast upon severall Leases and so of Debt Nota if a remainder be executed issue in remainder shall not have a formedon in remainder but in the discender and Count of an immediate gift but if there be a Lease for life to one the remainder in taile to A. the remainder in taile to B. A. dyes without issue if B. be chased to his formedon he shall not count of an immediate remainder but shall shew the first remainder to A. and that he is dead without issue 2. In formedon in the remainder or reverter omission of issue inheritable in the pedigree of the demandant abates the Writ but not upon the part of the perticular Tenant 3. The Demandant must make mention of the Sonne who survived the Father to which Son the Land discended but was not seised by force of the taile but he shall name him Sonne but not heire 4. The Demandant in a formedon in the Discender must make himselfe heire to him that was last seised and he to the Donee Note here because K. was never seised the Writ shall say Remanere not descendere and the Writ was Remansit jus because a discontinuance otherwise it should be Tenementa remanserunt Fraunces Case 7. Jac. fo 89. THe Plaintiffe pleads in barre of avowry that R. F. devised to I. his Sonne who leased to him the avowant replyeth that after the devise R. F. made a Feoffement to the use of the said I. upon condition that he shall suffer his Executors to take away his goods and the estate limitted to him was for sixty yeares if he should so long live with diverse remainders over and that after the death of F. I. hindered the Executors to carry away the goods whereupon T. in remainder entered and judgement given for the Plaintiffe 1. Resolv Although the condition be taken strictly the uses to I. onely and to his Heires are onely avoided by it 2. A disturbance by paroll is no Breach of the condition and because the avowant did not shew a speciall disturbance his replication was void 3. I. ought to have notice of the condition being a Stranger to it or otherwise he cannot breake it as a Copy-holder shall not forfeite for denyall of rent to him to whose use a Mannor is transferred before notice but he who bindes himselfe to doe any thing must take notice at his perill because he hath taken it upon him 4. Although that the Title which the Plaintiffe had made in barre to the avowry be destroyed yet he shall have judgement because his count is good and another Title that is to have the Land for sixty yeares by force of the uses declared upon the feoffement is given unto him by the Replication although that the title which he made for himselfe be destroyed yet the Court must adjudge upon all the record and judgement was entered for him accordingly Edward Foxes Case 7. Jacobi fo 93. A Revertioner upon a Lease for life the remainder for life in consideration of 50. l. demiseth granteth c. his reversion for 99. yeares rendering rent this is a bargaine and sale and there needs no attornement for the words of bargaine and sale are not necessary if there are words which tantamount as if at the common Law one had sould his Land an use had beene raised to the Vendee because their intent so appeared so here but if it appeare that their intent was to passe it at the common Law as if a Letter of Attorney be made to make livery the use had not risen and here appeareth their intent to passe it as a bargaine and sale because rent is reserved presently therefore it is reason that he shall have the rents of the particular Tenants presently which cannot be if it passe not by bargaine and sale and inrollment is not necessary because a tearme for yeares onely passeth in this case and â—o freehold See Sir Rowland Heywards Case 2. Report fo 35. Matthew Mannings Case 7. Jacobi fo 94. LEssee for yeares is bound in 200. Markes to W. C. and deviseth to his Wife for life and after her death to M. M and makes his Wife Executrix who agrees and dyeth intestate M. M. enters and takes administration of the goods not administred W. C. brings Debt against him Resolved that M. M. takes by Executory devise and not as a remainder and the estate limmitted to him in construction precedeth the limittation to the Wife as if he had devised that if the Wife die within the terme that then M. M. shall have the residue and also devised it to his Wife for life 2. This case is most strong because a Chattell which may vest and revest at pleasure of the Devisor without mischiefe to the Praecipe 2. A devise of the Terme and Occupation thereof all one Viz. So many yeares as the Feme shall live the remainder to M. M. 4. After the Executrix had agreed the first devisee cannot barre the Executory devise 5. A man may devise an estate which he cannot convey by act executed as to his Executors untill his Debts shall be paid the remainder over they have a Chattell determinable upon payment of the Debts which cannot be at the common Law If a Sheriffe sell a Terme upon a Fieri facias and judgement is reversed the sale shall stand otherwise none will buy any thing upon Execution and judgement was given for the Plaintiffe and affirmed in Error
the Lord distreine when no rent is arreare the Tenant or Lessee may make rescons and so releive himselfe The Abbot of Strata Mercella his Case 34. Eliz. fol. 23. IN a Quo warranto for claiming Waifes c. and Fellons goods c. the Defendant pleaded as to the Fellons goods that the Abbot of S. M. Licite habuit gavisus fuit them untill the Abbey was granted to the King by 27. H. 8. and pleads also 32. H. 8. c. 20. of reviving of priviledges of Abbies and that the K. granted a Mannor parcell of the Abbey tot talia tanta privilegia as the late A. had to one by whom he claimed by feoffement and pleaded not the feoffement by deede Judgement against the Defendant for the Queene it was said that the Charter of the Defendant was void 1. Because it appeares not what estate the Abbot had 2. Because the Defendant claimeth Catalla felonum appendant to a Mannor because he pleaded a feoffement of the Mannor and had not pleaded it by deed without which the priviledges doe not passe To the first the Court answered that it shall be intended a seisin in fee untill the contrary be shewed To the second no resolution but it was resolved that if the K. grant a Mannor bona catalla felonum dicto Manerio spectant these passe although they cannot be appendant But for the third exception judgement was given against the Defendant In this Case foure things worthy of consideration 1. What ancient franchises ought to have allowance as to that some may be claimed by prescription without record and some by record onely and a Charter of the latter shall not be allowed if it be before time of memory if it be not allowed within time of memory as allowance in Eyre or confirmation by the K. but usage will not serve and no more shall be allowed then are confirmed Obscure words in these ancient Charters shall be construed according to ancient usage and not according to usage at this day 2. A man may prescribe in Franchises lying in poynt of Charter with aide of allowance in Eyre without shewing the Originall Charter 3. If a Patent of priviledges whereby they are granted in fee referre to a grant made before to one for life onely this is good for the relation is to the quality and not to the quantity of the estate See there what trialls shall be allowed by Law such priviledges as are ancient flowers of the Crowne as Bona catalla felonum fugitivorum c. if these come againe to the K. they are merged in the Crowne but not those which were erected and created by the K. as Faires Markets Parkes Warren and the like Bucknalls Case 42. Eliz. Com. banco fol. 33. IF the Lord avow for other services then the Tenure is traversable if for more services of the same nature the seisin is traversable for he may incroach and it cannot be avoided in an avowry if it be not for an outragious distresse but seisin binds not in Ne injuste vexes Cessavit Assize Rescons or Trespasse but in them he shall traverse the Tenure but issue in taile successor of a Bishop c. shall avoide seisin in an avowry and every one may that can shew a deed of the tenure but none shall have a Contraformam feoffamenti but the feoffee or his Heires and incroachment hurteth not where there is no Tenure and if an incroachment be of payment at more dayes if they agree in the Sum it doth not prejudice Seisin in an avowry is not traversable generally as never seised of the services because by that meanes he leaveth no remedy to the Lord by avowry but in such a Case he shall disclaime or pleade out of his fee and so traverse the Tenure He who denyeth seisin after the limittation must first acknowledge a Tenure that the Lord may have his Writ of Customes and Services as if the Avowry be for rent fealty and suite Henslowes Case 42. Eliz fol. 36. AN Action of Debt was brought against Gage and others as Executors one of the Executors refused before the ordinary the probate and the rest of the Executors proved the Testament it was adjudged that notwithstanding that refusall he may administer the will afterwards at his pleasure for when many are named Executors and some of them refuse and other some prove the Testament those which refused may afterwards administer notwithstanding the refusall before the Ordinary but if all refuse before the Ordinary and the Ordinary commit the administration to another then they cannot prove at any time and the Executor that proveth the will ought to name every other of the Executors that refused in every action for recovery of Debts of the Testator and they may release the debts duties c. and they which refused may have an Action by survivor and after that Executors have administred and have once taken upon them the charge of the Executor-ship they cannot refuse at any time after It is holden in 2. R. 3. tit testament 4. that it is but of late times that the Church had the probate of Testaments in this Land for 't was given by an act c. and in all other Nations it is not so but in England and in many places of England the Stewards in their Courts Baron have probate of Testaments in their temporall Courts at this day Lynwood who was Deane of the Arches and writ in Anno. Dom. 1422. did confesse the probate of Testaments to belong to the Ordinaries De consuetudine Angliae non de communi jure and that in other Realms the Ordinaries have not so and in another place he affirmeth that the power of the Bishop in probate of Testaments is Per consensum regni suorum procerum ab antiquo And I have seene a Booke in Latine published 1573. by the Reverend Father Matthew Parker Arch Bishop of Canterbury who was very Learned in matters of Antiquity in these words Rex Angliae olim erat consiliorum Ecclesiasti orum praeses vindex temeritatis romanae propugnator Religi nis nec ullam habebant Episcopi authoritatem praetam eam quam à rege acceptam referebant jus testamenta probandi non habebant administrationis potestatem cuique delegare non poterant It was resolved by Littleton Newton and Danby in 7. E 4. 14. that if all the Executors refuse before the Ordinary they may prove the Testament afterwards but I think this is before the Ordinary hath committed the administration for afterwards they cannot The Executors have their Title by their Testament which is temporall But to the suing of Actions in the Kings Courts the Judges will not admit the Executors for to sue except that they shew the Testament proved under the seale of the Ordinary duely but alwayes the Kings Courts have used to allow the probate of any of the Executors to inable them all to sue actions but the probate of the Testament doth not