Selected quad for the lemma: life_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
life_n	blood_n	drink_v	flesh_n	36,140	5	8.2247	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A34969	Exomologesis, or, A faithfull narration of the occaision and motives of the conversion unto Catholick unity of Hugh-Paulin de Cressy, lately Deane of Laghlin &c. in Ireland and Prebend of Windsore in England now a second time printed with additions and explications by the same author who now calls himself B. Serenus Cressy, religious priest of the holy order of S. Benedict in the convent of S. Gregory in Doway.	Cressy, Serenus, 1605-1674.; Pearson, John, 1613-1686.; Falkland, Lucius Cary, Viscount, 1610?-1643. Discourse of infallibility.	1653 (1653)	Wing C6895; ESTC R29283	288,178	694

the rich of the earth have eaten and worshipped And they also saith he are brought to the table of Christ and partake of his body and bloud but they adore him only they are not satisfied because they doe not imitate him Let S. Chrysostome in 1. Cor. say This body the wise men worshipped in the manger c. Let us at least imitate those barbarous men we who are the Citizens of heaven Thou seest him not in a manger but upon the Altar not a woman holding him in her armes but the Priest himself present and the Spirit abundantly powred upon the sacrifice presented there Lastly let Theodorct Dial 2. say The mysticall Symbolls are understood which are celebrated and believed and adored likewise as being the very things which they are believed to be What is all this to a Socinian though all antiquity agree in the like language and not one Father explicitly dissent from it But as for Protestants not having the confidence to renounce the Fathers authority they make it their task to prove out of such places that the Fathers intended by such speeches that it was Idolatry to worship Christ present on the Altar But Nobis non licet esse tam disertis Of Communion under one Species 11. This is not a matter of doctrine but meer practise The church sayes not it is unlawfull to take it in both kinds but onely that upon reasons sufficiently prevailing with her she thinks fit in the ordinary practise it should be so administred The Governours Ecclesiasticall therefore are to be answerable for it But to demonstrate that even those who is their private opinion think it were better it should be administred in both kinds yet ought not upon pretence thereof to break forth into a sacrilegious separation I will only recommend these few considerations to our English Protestants viz. 1. That there is no explicit command in Scripture that the Sacrament should be communicated under both Species If they urge the example of our Saviour and the manner how he administred it they know that they themselves allow authority to the church to alter formes not essentiall to the Sacraments and accordingly practise both the form in Baptism and the holy Eucharist otherwise then they were first instituted 2. That it is evident and no ingenuous Protestant will deny it but that even in the Primitive churches it was an ordinary practise in severall occasions to receive it only in one kind 3. That not one proof can be shewed that the sick ever received the cup. 4. That notwithstanding in the opinion of Antiquity those who received it so were believed to have enjoyed the whole benefit and vertue of the Sacrament 5. That the Greek church though she gives it ordinarily in publique in both Species yet neither in private nor to the sick no nor as it is said in Lent Neither doth she make that difference any ground of her separation from the Roman church 6. That Protestants confesse that those who have a naturall antipathy against wine may receive the body alone and may notwithstanding assure themselves that they want no fruit or effect of the holy Eucharist Upon which grounds if they would duely consider what a horrible crime Schisme is they would no doubt believe that this were not a sufficient excuse for them 12. The only proof that I will give of the opinion and allowed practise of antiquity in this point shall be to set down here in English the 289. Epistle of S. Basile ad Caesariam Patriciam a memorable monument of the usage of private communicating of the holy Eucharist and that only under one Species among the antient Christians His words are these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. that is And truly every day to communicate and participate the holy body and blood of Christ is a good and profitable thing seeing he himself hath said in expresse words He that shall eat my flesh and drink my blood hath eternall life Now who does doubt but that daily to participate of life is no other thing but daily to live Therefore it is that we our selues do communicate four times every week to wit on our Lords day on the fourth day on the sixth day and on the Sabbath day And moreover upon other dayes if the memory of any Martyr be celebrated Now it would be superfluous for me to demonstrate that that custome is not to be condemned by which Christians were necessitated in the times of persecution in the absence of the Priest or Ministsr to receive the Communion privately with his own hands since an inveterate practise hath effectually confirmed it For all those who lived Monastically in the Deserts where there was no Priest reserving the Communion in their Cells received it of themselves In Alexandria likewise and in AEgypt each one of the common sort of people for the most part hath the Commnnion reserved in his own house For the Priest having once offered the Sacrifice and distributed it he that receives it entire all together and afterward daily communicates of it ought to believe that he communicates and receives the very same which the Priest gave him For likewise in the Church it self the Priest delivers a part of the Sacrifice and the Communicant receives it with an entire power to dispose of it and so with his own hands lists it to his own mouth Now it is the very same in power or vertue whether any one shall receive one only portion from the Priest or many portions together Hithert● S. Basil. CHAP. III. Of Invocation of Saints Of Veneration of Images Of Prayers and Offerings for the Dead and Purgatory Of Indulgences And of publike service in the Latin tongue With what charity and modesty the doctrines of the church are to be examined 1. COncerning Invocation of Saints to shew the opinion of the antient church about it it may suffice to take notice that for denying the lawfullnesse of it Uigilantius was accounted an Heretique as Dr. Fulke the Centuriators Osiander c. acknowledge out of S. Hierome I am sure S. Ambrose sayes in the very language of the Councell of Trent We ought to pray unto the Angells in our owne behalf who have been given for guards unto us we ought to pray unto the Martyrs whose bo●●dies remaining among us seem to be as it were a gage and hostage of their protection And S. Augustine in Psal. 85. in the language of the Church Litanies All Martyrs intercede for us adding To the end that they may rejoyce in our behalf who pray for us And Theodoret l. 8. de Martyr gives the very sense of the present church in this point We do not adore the Saints as Gods but we pray unto them as divine men that they would intercede for us A Tradition this was of the antient Jewish church also as those words of Josophus witnesse The pure souls which hear those that call upon them obtain in heaven a most holy place And the