Selected quad for the lemma: life_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
life_n believe_v love_v world_n 6,760 5 5.1542 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A56583 The doctrine of baptism and the disinction of the covenants, or, A plain treatise wherein the four essentials of baptism .... are diligently handled as also the business of the two covenants, wherein is proved that the covenant of life is not made to the seed of believers as coming out of their loins, and therefore that the baptism of infants is drawn from thence by a false consequence / by Thomas Patient. Patient, Thomas, d. 1666. 1654 (1654) Wing P718; ESTC R26182 105,019 204

There are 10 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Faith offered a more acceptable or excellent Sacrifice than Cain by which he obtained witness that he was righteous So by Faith in the promised seed he came to be righteous and accepted of God as you have heard in Ephes 1.3 God hath blest us with all spiritual and heavenly blessings in Heavenly things in Christ Jesus Therefore no heavenly or spiritual blessing can belong to any out of Christ for as in Adam all dy so in Christ shall all be made alive There is none made alive but those that are in Christ for the wicked mens resurrection is not said to be to life but to damnation 1 Cor. 15. ●1 with John 5.28 29. And therefore in thee shall all the Nations of the Earth be blessed Gen. 18.18 must imply thus much that out of Christ the true seed all the Nations should be accursed Gen. 12.3 with 22.18 Gal. 3.8 I must confess it is a sad thing that at such a time of the world as this where the means of grace and knowledge of the Gospel hath been so plentifully held forth that we must be forced to bestow such pains to prove that men cannot be in a State of salvation and acceptation before God in a covenant of grace without union in Christ by Faith But howsoever considering that the Apostle saith There is no other name under heaven by which we can be saved but by the name of Jesus and a particular faith in him Acts 4.12 and therefore Peter saith in John 6.69 Whether shall we go Thou hast the words of eternal life he is the way the truth and the life John 14.6 There is none can come into the Fathers love and mercy nor into the covenant of life or any spiritual privilege but by him he is the narrow way that leads to life and few there be that find it as Matth. 7.14 therefore saith the Apostle He that hath Christ hath life but he that hath not Christ hath not life but all the carnal unbelieving children from the foundation of the world unto this day have not Christ therefore not life that is to say nor the covenant of life nor the justification of life which every man must needs have that is in that covenant of life We find that all the Patriarchs and holy men of God by faith and patience inherited the promises and not by generation Heb. 6.12 and 11.12 therefore sprang there even of one and him as good as dead so many as the Stars in the sky for multitude and as the Sand which is by the Sea shore innumerable these all dyed in Faith This text speaks of that spiritual and believing seed of Abraham which he considered as believing and faithfull Abraham was the Father of according to Gen. 15.5 6. so shall thy seed be Secondly It further appears that the covenant of eternal life was never made with any but such as believe because all unbelievers both of Jews and Gentiles are charged under sin Romans 3.9 and have the wrath of God abiding on them John 3. last Yea though of the seed of Israel and children of that covenant of Circumcision to them Christ saith Except ye believe that I am he you shall dy in your sins John 8.24 And the Gospel tells the national Church of the Jews John 3.18 That those of them that beleeved not were condemned already because they believed not in the only begotten Son of God Which clearly proves that none of them were in a covenant of life by Generation for if they had then the want of conversion would not have damned them nor left them in a state of damnation Further doth not Christ himself call and account the unbelieving Jews the world when he saith to his disciples If you were of the world the world would love his own but because you are not of the world but I have chosen you out of the world therefore the world hates you And this world that Christ chuseth his disciples out of and that hated his disciples as they had formerly hated him are but the Nation of the Jews that were in that covenant of Circumcision which plainly proves that all unbelievers in that nation were the world and therefore not in a covenant of Grace And again it must needs be so because the Apostle saith in Romans 4.16 therefore is it of Faith that it might be by Grace to the end that the promise might be sure to all the seed Observe from the Text if the promise or covenant or any spiritual privilege should be intailed upon the flesh or conveyed any way then by Faith it could not be by Grace And again Faith is the first differencing Grace to difference Gods peopl from all other Acts 15.9 and put no difference between us and them purifying their hearts by faith therefore it is impossible the covenant of grace can be made to any other but such as have faith And again I find none counted the Spiritual seed of Abraham unto whom the covenant of life belongs but them that are in Christ by faith as Gallat 3.28 29. There is neither Jew nor Gentile there is neither Bond nor Free neither Male nor Female for you are all one in Christ Jesus and if you be in Christ then are you Abrahams seed and heirs according to the promise and so Rom. 4.14 If they which were of the Law be heirs Faith is made void and the promise made of none effect meaning thereby the Covenant of Circumcision as appears in ver 10. 11. and so in Romans 9.7 8. Not because they are the seed of Abraham are they all children but in Isaac shall thy seed be called that is they which are the children of the flesh they are not the children of God but the children of the promise are counted for the seed Where you see that the Apostle doth deny that seed of Abraham that were only his children according to the flesh to be the spiritual seed but such as are born of promise or begotten by promise they are accounted for the seed chosen in him and united to him by Faith These were pointed and figured out by the National and Temporal seed that came out of the Loins of Isaac those Souls there born in the house and bought with money were in the outward covenant and privileges but these regeneate and born again by promise are the Heavenly seed So the heavenly generation are such only born from above and this is that the Psalmist speaks of in Psalm 22.30 A seed shall serve him and it shall be accounted to him for a generation For the Temporal Israel and the typical Election of them into the temporal covenant did point out this Spiritual Election in a Spiritual Covenant confirmed of God in Christ Jesus Further it appears that none but such as believe are in a covenant of Grace because without faith it is impossible to please God Heb. 11 6. therefore Abel by faith had his person and his offering accepted Gen. 4.4 but
infatuated and had no ears to hear his plain word They of this opinion do defend the contrary to what purpose should any man seek the conversion of any of Believers children whether formerly of the nation of the Jews or now the nations of the believing Gentiles seeing they are born heirs of a covenant of eternal life and so are in as good a state without conversion and believing and being born again as any other soul by believing and by new birth can be brought into This doctrine tends to justify the Rebellious Jews against John Baptist and against Christ the Sadduces and Pharisees came to Johns Baptism Matthew 3. Saith John O ye Generation of Vipers who hath forwarned you to fly from the wrath to come bring for 〈◊〉 fruits meet for repentance and think not to say within your selves we have Abraham to our Father John you see would have this people to be converted to intitle them to this covenant of Grace and so to baptism which is an Ordinance of the same covenant and not so much as think so erroneously as if being children to Abraham according to the flesh should intitle them to the same therefore saith he think not within your selves we have Abraham to our Father and we are his children according to the flesh and therefore we need not a work of conversion or true Repentance to intitle us to the privileges of the covenant such as was baptism And also in John 8.31 and forwards saith Christ unto some Jews unto whom he spake If you abide in my words then are you my Disciples indeed and you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free and then you shall be free indeed They answered him We be Abrahams children and never were in bondage to any How sayest thou then We shall be made free Where you may observe these wicked obstinate Jews were of the same opinion that they were in a state of happiness good enough by generation by being Abrahams seed according to the flesh Jesus answereth Who so committeth sin is the servant of sin and the Servant abideth not in the house for ever We find Christ afterwards tells these Sons of Abraham that they were so far from being the adopted sons of God in a covenant of life that they were of their Father the Devil and these same persons Christ speaks to in verse the 24. telling them Except they believed Christ was he they should dy in their sins Christ was far from this opinion as to think that covenant of Circumcision to be a covenant of life but he doth throughly reprehend them for this groundless confidence which error was the main obstacle that hindered the Jews from faith and repentance because they thought it intituled them to happiness enough to be of the stock of Abraham and to be born heirs of the covenant of Circumcision This very rotten opinion was to them one of the Devils sleights to lull them asleep in a carnal and unconverted condition they thought that needed not which thought of theirs had been true enough provided all the children of Abraham had by generation interest in the covenant of life which other men could have no interest in without regeneration But Christ you see presseth a necessity of conversion to these children of Abraham that at the present were as fully interessed in the covenant of Circumcision as Abraham himself even to Nicodemus which was a Ruler of the Jews Christ presseth a necessity thereof to him and also labours by a parable in Luke 16. to convince those sottish Jews that one might be the seed of Abraham according to the flesh and yet be irrecoverably damned and therefore he brings in the rich man in Hell speaking thus Father Abraham I pray thee send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water to cool my tongue And Abraham is brought in owning him to be his Son speaking thus My Son remember that thou in thy life time receivedst thy good things Where you may observe That the man in Hell irrecoverably damned owns Abraham to be his Father and Abraham also doth acknowledge him to be his Son My Son saith Abraham where you clearly see man may be a Son of Abraham and yet damned thou hadst thy good things in this life but Lazarus his evil things Ezekiel 18.9 10. where a just man is presupposed to beget a son that is a Robber and a Shedder of blood and that goes out in all manner of wickedness and that in Israel Wherein observe Abraham owns no other privilege belonged to the rich man by virtue of being the Son of Abraham but what was in this life or in this world Hell was his best portion in the world to come which if he had been born heir to the covenant of life how then could Abrahams affirmation have been true Beloved Let all ingenuous Spirits that are not willing to walk blind-fold consider how contrary to the whole tenor of the Gospel this opinion is and how destructive to this fundamental principle of the Gospel the necessity of Christ of Regeneration and destroys all sense of the necessity of conversion and helps to harden men to destruction as it did the blind Jews who as it appears were fully blinded in the receipt of that opinion that being Abrahams seed according to the flesh interessed them in happiness and eternal life Fourthly This opinion destroys the doctrine of the new covenant and the nature of it and the manner of Gods making of it with the soul for to make a new covenant with the soul is to write the Law of God in a mans heart and in his mind and to infuse saving knowledge and faith by which God unites the soul to himself and so pardons all his sins and without any condition considered in the creature binds over himself to be their God freely in Christ and binds over himself to own them to be his people And only thus and no otherwise is God said to make his new covenant with a poor soul Whereas this dream would seem to bear you in hand that a whole nation may be in a new covenant and have it made with them and yet have none of all this work wrought in their hearts Fifthly This opinion destroys the doctrine of Justification by faith in Christ only seeing that it doth hold out another way than by faith to come to Justification which is by carnal birth of beleeving parents for if a soul be admitted into a Covenant of life I hope you are not ignorant that Justification is a great privilege in the new covenant and really the portion of all that are in that covenant Sixthly This opinion destroys the Doctrine and foundation of all Gospel Churches where it is held which will appear by two things First It destroys the matter of the Church you know that this is a fundamental truth that the matter of the Church ought now under the Gospel to be Saints by calling 1 Cor. 1.2 Spiritual
Teachers perswaded the Gallatians to be a Covenant of life and that they could not be saved without it which covenant the Apostle Paul called the flesh in Gal. 3.3 meaning that Covenant which God had established in their flesh for an everlasting Covenant as he so calls it Gen. 17.13 This shall be my Covenant in your flesh saith the Lord for an everlasting Covenant Therefore saith Paul in Rom. 4.1 What shall we say that Abraham our Father as appertaining to the flesh hath found if Abraham were justified by works Mark his Exposition of that Covenant appertaining to the flesh to be a Covenant of works which in ●●e 10. verse he clears to be Circumcision in opposition to that Gospel promise which Abraham had before he was circumcised and so he doth all along in that Chapter Herein the 3. of Gal. he doth set the Covenant of grace and that of works in opposition the one he calls the Spirit the other flesh which he most evidently explains in Chap. 5.1 2 3. where saith he Stand fast in that liberty which Christ hath made you free and be not intangled again with the yoake of bondage Here observe again that he calls it as Peter doth Acts 15.10 a yoke of bondage which is evident that they were set at freedom and liberty from as that which was abolished and they freed from as a yoak which neither they nor their Fathers were able to hear as appears in Gal. 5.1 2 3. Behold I Paul say to you if ye be circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing Nay in v. 3. For I testify to every one that is circumcised that he is a Debtor to do the whole Law and in ver 4. He sets it in opposition to the covenant of grace and this is explained more in Gallatians chap. 6.12 13. verses Now all this considered you may clearly see the Covenant of Circumcision made to Abraham and his seed in their Generation that he would give them Canaan with the blessings thereof and in that sense be their God to protect preserve and externally to privilege them with the means of grace and tenders of the Gospel and the external blessings of Canaan upon condition they would be circumcised and keep the Law All these things are typical this deliverance out of Egypt typing out the deliverance out of Hell That temporal Israel after the flesh that were redeemed out of Egypt typed out the spiritual Israel that were redeemed out of the spiritual bondage and as before hath been said Moses then a temporal Redeemer Mediator or Saviour typed out Christ the spiritual Mediator and Saviour therefore in the 1 Cor. 10.6 The Apostle tells us these were our figures or types So this being premised we have the sense of the Text here plain that as the spiritual disciple or Israelite when he believes and confesseth his faith thereby shewing his interest in Jesus Christ is baptized into Christ Jesus the Mediator of that Covenant which he is in by faith So the temporal Israel by birth or being bought with money or cohabitation in that family of Israel comming to have a right to the Covenant of Circumcision whereof Moses was the Mediator they were likewise baptized unto Moses in the Cloud and in the Sea that being as real a confirmation to them of the temporal deliverance from Egypt into Canaan by the hand of Moses as our baptism is a confirmation to the spiritual Israel of their spiritual deliverance by Jesus their Mediator from death and condemnation to eternal life And whereas the Apostle calls that meat spiritual meat and that drink spiritual drink he here speaks figuratively as before affirmed Not that the Manna eaten by the whole Nation of Israel was in it self spiritual but it was a figure of the spiritual bread therefore Christ saith to the Jews in John 6.32 33. Verily verily I say unto you Moses gave you not that bread from heaven but my Father giveth you the true bread from heaven Observe that word Giveth not did give but giveth for the bread of God is that which cometh down from heaven and giveth life to the world And therefore saith he My Father giveth you the true bread from heaven that is the substance of that shadow and so that rock was Christ meaning a figure or type of Christ What is all this Beloved to the proving of a Covenant of life running in the flesh either then or now to the Gentiles under the Gospel seeing it is clear that all these Ordinances as the Apostle calls them Heb. 9. Carnal Ordinances did type out or figure out spiritual and substantial things For their sacrifices for sin typed out Christ but they were not Christ and their typical remissions which they had by their sacrifice That remission I say which the whole body of Israel had by offering up their sin-offering can be understood to be no other but typical A man might be under that typical Remission and yet ne under the wrath of God and be damned and a poor Gentile at the utmost part of the Earth believing as Rahab did in Canaan as truly justified though he had none of this typical remission and none of these before mentioned figures so that we conclude the whole Nation of the Jews had not a covenant of eternal life in the flesh made unto them though they had a temporal typical covenant as I have all along called it that is consisting of such Laws and privileges that had not Christ in them but did point at him to come therefore they are called in Heb. 9. Patterns of Heavenly things but not the very things themselves They are called by the Apostle Beggarly Elements or Rudiments of the World or a School-master to lead to Christ The Jews literal obedience to the Law typing out the obedience to faith Deut. 30.12 13 14. with Rom. 10. from v. 6. to the 10. ver Now beloved the literal obedience in it self performed by the carnal Jew though it figured out the substantial obedience viz. faith in Christ and though the Rest in Canaan typed out the spiritual Rest in Christ yet I hope no man will be so absurd but he will confess that this litteral obedience it was not the spiritual obedience and that this rest in Canaan it was but a shadow of that rest in Christ not the very rest it self But some may say so of baptism and the Supper that these are the signs of inward and spiritual things but it doth not follow that these are the spiritual things Beloved Observe warily for here lies the ground of this great mistake the want of distinguishing between these figures that type out Christ to come and these Sacramental signs that do confirm and ratifie his being already come Those typical signs and figures then which typed out Christ to come did properly belong to that typicall seed the body of Israel that typed out the spiritual seed to come But now these signs I say these Sacramentall signs that are instituted
all the posterity of a believing person so many generations to come as Levy from Abraham did believe and repent in their believing parents then there is no ground to oppose that all the world at this day are believers because they were all in the line of believing Noah he being the father from whence all the world did proceed that are now living this day And again observe that if the Covenant of life belongs to all believers seed then we need not want for Church-members because all the world are the children and off-spring of believing Noah and this argument carries the right of Covenant to all the world being the children of a Believer viz. Noah An answer to that text Mat. 19.13 Further some bring that in Matthew 19.13 There were brought unto him little children that he should put his hand upon them and pray and the disciples rebuked them and Jesus said suffer little children and forbid them not to come to me for of such is the kingdom of God and he laid his hands on them and departed In Mark 10.13 thus And they brought young Children to him that he should touch them and his Disciples rebuked them that brought them but when Jesus saw it he was much displeased and said unto them Suffer the little children to come unto me and forbid them not for of such is the kingdom of God verily I say unto you whosoever shall not receive the Kingdom of God as a little child shall not enter therein From hence would some maintain a covenant of eternal life in the flesh for that end they bring this Text but let us examine what the meaning of it may be First whose children they were that were brought to Christ doth not appear its probable they were the seed of Abraham but what their mediate parents whether believers or wicked persons doth not appear certainly but by the former discourse in the chapter it should seem they might be wicked and ungodly persons for there were such mentioned before that tempted Christ and asked him questions The next thing is for what did they bring these children unto Christ most certain not to baptize them because Christ it is said baptized not but the Disciples John 4.2 What then were they brought to Christ for One Evangelist saith He took them in his arms and blessed them another saith He laid his hands on them and prayed All which considered in my judgement it doth probably appear they were brought to him to be healed of some disease it being usual in those daies that by prayer and laying on of hands they did heal the sick But the main expression in the Text to be noted is this That of such are the Kingdom of God From these words some gather that all the children of believing parents do belong to the kingdom of God and if to the Kingdom of God then to all the privileges of that kingdom But as you have heard it will be very doubtfull whether these children had any believing parents to the fifth or sixth degree for of such is the Kingdom of God saith the Text the which we must understand thus That all the children born of the body of Believers and that when little ones in arms do belong to the kingdom of God if you will make this text to countenance that error of the covenant in the flesh the which is erroneous as appears in that the greatest number of believers children never belonged in that sense to the kingdom of God for Adam had a Cain as well as an Abel Noah had a Ham as well as a Sem Abraham had an Ishmael as well as an Isaac Isaac had an Esau as well as a Jacob. And so I might mention all the Scriptures wherein in like manner God doth as well bring forth the generation of the wicked out of the godly and the generation of the elect out of the line of the wicked indefinitely But if by Kingdom of God be meant that condition or state that men are interessed in by virtue of a Covenant of eternal life and that believers children should by birth and generation belong to it then this fully crosseth that doctrine of Christ to Nicodemus Joh. 3.5 as was formerly spoken to Object But some may say It s possible that such a little child may believe because in Matthew 18. 3 4 5 6. verses it is said We should not offend such little ones that believe If you grant that some children when little do believe and therefore belong to the kingdom of God to that I assent let them be whose children they will whether of Believers or Infidels If they believe they are in Christ and so interessed in the Kingdom of God But what makes this for the covenant in the flesh of carnal unbelieving seed Again If by Kingdom of God should be understood the Jewish state or Church and children here understood for children of that Jewish nation then in that sense it is true that all the children born in the Jewish Church by virtue of their birth in that family or nation belonged as members to that National Church being interessed in the Covenant of Circumcision which was the national covenant and the privileges of the same and were by natural birth interessed therein Answ But the true and proper meaning of the Text appears plain to be here in Mark 10.13 14 15. compared together for when he had in the 14. verse said Of such belongeth the Kingdom of God in verse the 15. he presently saith Verily I say unto you whosoever receiveth not the kingdom of God as a little child shall not enter therein this I say interprets these words before Of such as the kingdom of God that is of such like in grace as these be by nature such souls that are by Gods grace subdued and brought into a child-like frame of spirit they only are such as are of the kingdom of God as for example When the Disciples reasoned who should be greatest among them Christ set a little child as a patern of humility innocency and harmlesness And also saith the Apostle Be you children in malice and old men in understanding 1 Cor. 14. and saith Peter As new born babes desire the sincere Milk of the word that ye might grow thereby 1 Pet. 2. ● And so as there is a parity held forth between a man and his wife and Christ and his Church so in Scripture there is between a child in nature and a child in grace as the natural begetting the spiritual begetting alluding to that there is the natural birth and the spiritual birth held forth by that sucking of the Mothers breast and by sucking of the breast of Gods word A little babe we know in nature will trust to his parents so the new born babe will trust in Christ if the natural babe want any thing it will go to its parents and ask them for it so must a new born Babe make his request known to God in all
constantly resorted to the meetings of the people in New England desiring to have good satisfaction in them and their doctrine and practice before I joined in Communion In order thereunto I constantly attended the preaching of the word where hearing many often preaching for baptizing of children of believing parents I began to examine the grounds thereof and the weight of their arguments and genuine scope and drift of the Scriptures alleged by them to prove that point and finding that the Scriptures 〈◊〉 generally 〈…〉 contrary to 〈…〉 and proper dri●●●●●●cope Also finding 〈…〉 th●s●●●●tion Argument by 〈…〉 ●o exceeding contrary to several 〈◊〉 of R●●igio● which both the● and I did believ● These things being hinted into 〈◊〉 soul I w●● resolved to examine the 〈◊〉 I 〈◊〉 formerly 〈◊〉 great profit 〈…〉 several other ●●nts of Reli●●● B●● 〈◊〉 this Resolution temptations came in 〈◊〉 my 〈◊〉 that I was but weak ●●nd 〈◊〉 ca●● it were not a 〈◊〉 did I think 〈◊〉 ●any ●●●nent 〈◊〉 for Religion Piety Gifts and 〈◊〉 should not discover 〈◊〉 sooner 〈◊〉 I therefore it 〈◊〉 purpose 〈◊〉 ●●me to trou●●● my self 〈◊〉 whi●● I had this answer in 〈◊〉 soul that I had been too ●●ng mislead already o● 〈◊〉 grou●● 〈…〉 and 〈…〉 〈…〉 ●n th● 〈…〉 cam● 〈…〉 peop●● 〈…〉 Not ●it 〈…〉 th● 〈…〉 choice 〈…〉 ●●ching their flocks by Night In the first place this eminent truth was delivered and revealed to them when all the learned and eminent men in Israel had no knowledge thereof And finding the poor Theef on the Cross to have a sounder Judgement than the General Synod or Council of Learned Men at Jerusalem and also the Speech of Christ to this purpose in Matthew 11.25 where Christ thanks his Father for hiding these things from the wise and prudent and revealing them to Babes and sucklings out of his good pleasure the spirit being like the wind which bloweth when and where it listeth And also finding some of Christs Disciples bearing testimony of Christ in Luke 19.38 39 40. The Pharisees desired Christ to rebuke them But Christ answered and said I tell you if these should hold their peace the stones woul● immediately ●●y out Where I observed Christ to desc●●● and not to ascend he doth not say ●f his simple and weak discip●● should neglect ●●eir testimony th● 〈◊〉 Pharisees would cry out but if his disciples neglect the stones should which manifests that God loves to choose the most simple and foolish things to reveal his will by And then again I found God had not so much ingaged by promise to reveal himself to men considered of such outward and excellent parts but in Psalm 25.14 The Secrets of the Lord are with them that fear him and he will shew them his Covenant And Christ saith in John 15.15 You are my Friends if you do whatsoever I command you henceforth I call you not Servants for the Servant knoweth not what his Lord doth but I have called you Friends for all things that I have heard of the Father I have made kno●● you And David saith Thou hast made me wiser than my teachers because I have kept thy Commandments Where the Lord promises t●aching principally to such as fear him and conscienciously keep his Commandments guiding them in Judgement and in the way that he should choose Notwithstanding I found further Objections in my heart that though it was not men of parts and outward Learning but bab● and suc●●ings having their hearts bowed to obedi●●● and to the holy fear of God That God would teach yet I was sensible of so much evil in my heart that I questioned whether I might not be mislead upon which I was put upon humble and fervent prayers to the Lord to guide and teach me and to reveal his mind to me having again resolutions to seek the mind of God in this truth and great incouragements to believe that God would satisfy me and the rather from my former experience of his goodness having satisfyed me in many weighty points that I was every way as much unsettled in Upon which this Temptation came in afresh upon me what need I trouble my self in a point so Disputable for if by my search and tryall in that matter I should come to see grounds swaying in conscience against childrens baptism that then I should be generally dispised and slighted of all the godly in that Countrie and not only be frustrated of Communion and Fellowship with them but must exp●●● to suffer imprisonment confiscation of goods it banishment at least which would be my ruin not knowing where to go but in the woods amongst Iulians and wild beasts Under this Temptation I had a sore conflict my evil and treacherous heart resisting the blessed motions of the Spirit of God but considering that the ground of these discouraging arguments did arise from the flesh and the Devil as Peter when he said Pity thy self Master this thing shall not be to thee My Resolution was as Christ saith Get thee behind me Satan thou savourest not the things of God Which put me in no small agony or conflict for some good space together but it pleased the Lord to set that Scripture home upon my heart Buy the truth and sell it not buy the truth at any rate but sell it at no rate if truth cost me my life I must buy it though I might have all the favour and friendship in the world I must not sell it this wrought in m● a grounded and settled resolution that I would seek after the mind of God as well in suffering truths as other because Christ saith He that keeps the word of my patience I will keep him in the hour of Temptation apprehending that to be the words of Christs patience he embracing and practizing whereof would bring the crosse that is contempt and hatred from all sorts of men I found Christ said for this cause he was born and came into the World to bear witness to the truth these things satisfyed me and that from the Lord that I ought to make diligent search what his mind was in this point Hereupon I found the special presence of God with me carrying out my heart to the Lord by Faith and earnest Prayer to be instructed and guided all which time I was not acquainted with any that opposed Christening children and conversed onely with such as were for that practice Finding my carnal part to desire satisfaction in Infant-baptism but the more I conferred with or heard any preach for it the more was I convinced of the folly and ignorance of that judgment and practice having heard one man preach fifteen Sermons upon this subject urging that in substance which many considerable Authors had wrote I also searched many Authors who wrote thereof night and day with much attention weighing and examining the grounds they urged many times breaking my sleep by watching in the night season at the last it pleased the Lord to reveal his mind to me so that
as with safety the party as to the manner may be drowned again and again See the instance of Naaman who dipped himself seven times in Jordan 2 Kings 5.14 To this sense of the word at least in this place both the Greek Latine and English Churches agree as is affirmed by able Authors Thirdly In that the phrase in which there is mention made of such an appointment of Christ is affirmed doth necessarily import such a thing and therefore when mention is made of baptizing which is commonly translated in or into suits with Dipping and not that Preposition which signifies with and so suits with Sprinkling And therefore it may be as well rendred I baptize you in Water and he shall baptize you in the Holy Spirit Mark 1.8 So it is rendred John did baptize in the Wilderness and in the River of Jordan ver 4 5. or that John was in the Spirit on the Lords day Rev. 1.10 And they were baptized in the Cloud and in the Sea 1 Corinth 10. and ● It may as well be rendred I baptize you or dip you into Water as it is rendred they were casting a Net into the Sea Mark 1.16 for which the words are affirmed to be the same and it would be too improper a Speech to say John did baptize with the Wilderness and they were casting a net with the Sea Fourthly That this appointment of Christ is by way of Dipping and not sprinkling appears In that for the resemblance and likeness hereunto the Israelites passing under the Cloud and in the Sea where the Egyptians that were their Lords and Commanders their Pursuers and Enemies that sought their destruction were drowned left behind and seen no more is by the Holy Spirit called a Baptism 1 Cor. 10.2 They were baptized in the Cloud Where observe It is not here rendred with the Cloud and with the Sea as in the other place Mark 1.8 with Water because it sutes with sprinkling although the word be the same But in the Cloud and in the Sea which sutes with Dipping or Over-whelming and so with the appointment of Christ they passing through the midst of the Red or bloody Sea on dry land which stood on both sides as a Wall and being under the Cloud as men in a carnal eye overwhelmed and drowned and yet truly saved and safe from their Enemies Fifthly That this appointment of Christ was not by sprinkling but by dipping or putting the person into or under Water appears by Philips baptizing the Eunuch It is said They went both down into the Water both Philip the baptizer and the Eunuch that was the person to be baptized and being there in the water Philip baptized or dipped him in that water as John did Jesus in the River of Jordan And it is said They descended or went down into the water so they ascended or went straight way up or out of the water see for this Acts 8.38 39. Mat. 3.16 Mark the expression And Jesus when he was baptized went up straightway out of the Water therefore he had been down in the water Sixthly That this appointment of Christ was not by sprinkling but by dipping or as it were a drowning appears in that John the Baptizer his work being to baptize remains in the Wilderness by the River of Jordan and afterwards in Enon near Salem and the reason that is rendred by the Spirit of the Lord why he abode there was because there was much water which need not have been if that appointment could have been performed by sprinkling and not by dipping See Luke 3.2 3. John 3. 23. Seventhly That this appointment of Christ was not to be performed by sprinkling but by dipping appears from the nature of the Ordinance it self for it is such an Ordinance as whereby the person that submitteth thereto doth visibly put on Christ Jesus the Lord and is hereby visibly planted into his Death holding forth therein a lively similitude and likeness unto his Death whereby only through faith he now professeth he hath escaped death and is in hopes to obtain life everlasting and so to have fellowship with him in his Death and to reckon himself dead with him to sin Sathan the Law and the Curse See Gal. 3.27 Rom. 6.2 3 5 7. 9. 1 Cor. 15.29 But the planting of a person into the likenesse of death is no way resembled by sprinkling but by dipping it is lively set forth and demonstrated Eighthly This appointment of Christs baptism is an Ordinance whereby the person that submitteth thereto doth hereby visibly and clearly resemble the burial of Christ and his being buried in respect of the old man the former Lusts and Corruptions like the Egyptians to be taken away and seen no more See Rom. 6.4 6. Col. 2.12 But sprinkling doth no way lively resemble the Burial of Christ or the person being buried with him as Dipping doth Ninthly This appointment of Christs baptism is an Ordinance whereby the person that submitteth thereto doth visibly and lively hold forth herein the Resurrection of Christ declares him whose life was taken away from the earth to be alive again who although he dyed and was buried yet was not left in the grave to see corruption but was raised again and behold he liveth for evermore And as hereby he holds forth the Resurrection of Christ so doth he also his own being planted in the likeness thereof so as to reckon himself to be in Soul and Spirit quickned and risen with Christ from henceforth to live unto God the Fountain of Life and Christ Jesus the Lord who dyed for him and rose again and so to walk in newness of life in this present world being also begot into a lively hope that in the world to come he shall be raised and quickned both in soul and body to a life everlasting See Rom. 6.4 5 8 11. Acts 8.33 35 36. Col. 2.12 1 Cor. 15.29 1 Pet. 1.3 But sprinkling doth no way lively resemble the resurrection of Christ or the Soul or bodies rising or being raised by him as the way of dipping doth Therefore this appointment of Christ was and still is to be performed by way of dipping or putting the person into or under the water and not by sprinkling Tenthly Dipping doth hold forth a conformity to Christ in his sufferings and afflictions as Christ saith I have a Baptism and how am I streightned until it be accomplished meaning his sufferings Now one end of Baptism is to represent Christs Sufferings and our Sufferings with him which is in a lively manner set out by dipping into water and therefore when the Saints do express their afflictions they do set them forth by being in the depths or in the deep waters as David in Psalm 130. Out of the depths have I cryed unto the Lord meaning deep afflictions and God saith in Isaiah 43.2 When thou passest through the Waters they shall not overflow thee meaning affliction and therefore a believer is to be dipped and plunged all
that generation must needs be born heirs to if they were born heirs of a covenant of grace which if this should be asserted as it is by those who defend childrens baptism Then this fundamental point of Religion must needs be denyed that all mankind are by nature the children of wrath Ephes 2.2 and that all both Jews and Gentiles are charged under sin Rom. 3.9 And there is none righteous no not one But be it known to you this is a fundamental doctrine of truth generally acknowledged by all the godly That we are dead in sins and trespasses wherein in times past we walked according to the course of this world according to the Prince of the power of the air the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience among whom also we had our conversation in times past in the lust of the flesh and of the mind and were children of wrath by nature as well as others Now the Apostle Paul affirmeth this to be equally the state of himself who was born in the Church of Israel as well as the Gentiles and David doth affirm this of all in general Psalm 14.2 3. which the Apostle Paul urgeth in Rom. 3.9 forwards speaking of himself and the rest of the National Churches of the Jews What are we saith he better than they meaning than the Gentiles No in no wise for we have before proved that both Jews and Gentiles are all under sin as it written there is none righteous no not one there is none that understandeth there is none that seeketh after God they are all gone out of the way they are together become abominable there is none that doth good no not one And in Psalm 51. David saith I was conceived in sin and brought forth in iniquity who was a child of the Church of God as it is usually termed But beloved this doctrine is clear in Scripture and clearly experienced by every Godly Christian which truth must needs be overthrown if the whole body of Israel were born adopted Sons and heirs of a covenant of eternal life born heirs of Justification then they were never heirs of wrath nor in a state of damnation nor never proved nor charged under sin nor never all unrighteous because born heirs of a covenant of Grace aad of righteousness nor never born dead in sins and trespasses for that is inconsistent with being in a covenant of grace and life This opinion of holding the covenant of grace to be intailed in the flesh opposing it self so directly against this forementioned foundation of Religion must needs be a gross error so considered The second fundamental point of Religion that this error opposeth it self against is stability in a covenant of eternal life it cannot be imagined that I should much insist upon proving this Doctrine of stability in grace to be a fundamental truth I shall take that for granted from the nature of the new covenant in several Scriptures before recited as in Psalm 125. They that trust in the Lord shall be as Mount Zion which cannot be removed but as the Mountains are round about Jerusalem so shall the Lord be about them from this time forth and for ever And in Psal 89.33 If thy children sin I will afflict them with the rods of men but my loving kindness will I not utterly take from them nor suffer my faithfulness to fail My covenant will I not break nor alter the thing that is gone out of my mouth But taking this for granted to be a truth that all born in the Church of the Jews were born heirs of his stable Covenant and so were really and in truth in the covenant of grace then most of the Church of Israel that were in a covenant of grace were damned and not saved as Isaiah 10.22 23. Though Israel were as the sand of the Sea yet a Remnant of them were saved only And so Isaiah with Rom. 9.27 28 31. But Israel which followed after the Law of righteousness hath not obtained to the Law of righteousness Paul saith Rom. 11.5 There was a Remnant according to the election of grace and in verse 7. how they obtained it but the rest were hardened all but the remnant were blinded and hardened Therefore if such multitudes as the sand of the Sea were all really in a covenant of grace most of them must be understood to fall out of the covenant and so to fall out of the covenant of life This is another fundamental truth that this opinion is fully against defending that souls may be truly in a covenant of eternal life and yet perish and be damned The third foundation that this error overthrows is The necessity of Conversion or Regeneration which doctrine is eminently confirmed by Christ in the Gospel as a fundamental truth John 3.4 5. where Christ speaking to Nichodemus tells him th except a man be born again of water and of the Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God And likewise in John 8.24 Except ye believe that I am he ye shall dy in your sins And John 3. two last verses He that believeth not the wrath of God abideth on him and he shall not see life The before mentioned errors that holds a covenant of life running in the flesh upon the carnal seed opposeth it self against this for might the carnal seed of Israel say to Christ why do you preach such a doctrine to us That except you be born again you cannot enter into the Kingdom of Heaven We affirm the contrary seeing by the first birth we have an interest in the covenant of grace and eternal life already without believing and being born again and so are entered into the Kingdom of God and the privileges thereof Whereas you say That except you believe that I am he you shall dy in your sins why doth Christ pronounce death without believing seeing we are acquainted with another way to enter into life than the way of believing which is to be begotten of one of the church or a believer We find the Holy Ghost in the 1 John 5. saith He that hath Christ hath life he that hath not Christ hath not life No saith this error there were thousands that were interessed in life without having Christ that is to say by carnal generation Saith the Apostle There is no other name under heaven by which we can be saved but by the name of Jesus Yea saith this error There is another name by which we may come into a covenant of eternal life and so to be saved so that here lies the case where Christ in the Gospel powerfully affirms no other way to life but by believing regeneration and coming to Jesus Christ This opinion destroys all these testimonies opening another door of entrance into the covenant of life besides this and that by fleshly generation though Christ saith to Nicodemus Joh. 3. That which is born of the flesh is flesh and that which is born of the Spirit is Spirit as if souls were
another and this Law was by Moses delivered in Leviticus 11. spoken of to Peter in Acts 10. Call not thou unclean what God hath made clean and likewise the eating blood is forbidden Gen. 9.4 or flesh with the life thereof the same Moses gave Leviticus 17.10 11. where blood is forbidden upon the same ground and reason We find Gen. 6.5 that God hints at a sin of the old world for which he brought the flood which was that the Sons of God married the daughters of men seeing they were fair which must needs be understood there was a Law prohibiting Seths posterity to marry with Cains This Law was also given by Moses in Deut. 7.2 3. We must of necessity understand these Laws were from God to Adam and so to his Sons and so in substance the same was given to Abraham with some additions and the same by Moses committed to writing with further additions but this is the result that I would come to God having promised the seed of the woman to come out of that flesh did institute an external covenant of worship that the Lord did carry all along upon the flesh or line out of which the Messiah should come and in which flesh the Word would be incarnate I understand upon the first promise of Christ to Adam and Eve God then made this made this Ceremonial covenant of Worship with Adams family therefore both his Sons were trained up as Worshippers and this must needs be because Cain was never in a covenant of Grace nor we have no ground to judge that he had ever any appearance of true grace in him but God having no intent to bring his promised seed out of Cain or Abel and also resolved there should be a world as well as a Church he suffers Cain to murther Abel upon which he rejects Cain with all his posterity as a Fugitive and a Vagabond from what did he reject him but from this Church Covenant of Ceremonial obedience and worship but when Seth was born God as it appears to me did renew a fresh Election upon him and his seed according to the flesh and the whole Race of Seth were Gods Church God hereby teaching that the Messiah must come out of that Family according to the flesh and not out of Cains or his posterity nor any other And when God had destroyed the world by the Flood then there was only Noahs Family consisting of eight persons being all of them in this Church covenant of worship for a time till God pitched a fresh election upon Sem by the mouth of Noah his Father Gen. 9.26 where Ham and Japhet with their posterities are past by though as truly the seed of believing Noah as Sem was And this Ceremonial covenant of Works goes on upon Sem till the time of Abraham the world growing then numerous God would have his Church in a more narrow compass and more especially take unto him that particular family out of which Christ should come which was Abraham So that by the way observe The main ground upon which God elects Abrahams family into the outward Covenant with himself and not Lots nor any of the rest of the Godly families then living in the world It was not because Abraham was any more a believer or his family the family of a believer for if so then Lot and his family and all the godly mens families then in the world had been necessarily taken into the covenant of Circumcision because they and their families had been believers as well as Abrahams for this is a sure Rule if God give a promise or a command to any person considered in such a capacity as a Believer then whosoever is a Believer that command and promise belongs unto them I might by manifold instances clear this as when God saith to Joshua I will not leave thee nor forsake thee This being not made to him under any other consideration but as a Believer The Apostle is bold to say this promise is made to the whole Church of the Hebrews Heb. 13.5 they being all believers as Joshua was but this covenant of Circumcision now so termed was made with Abraham his seed and family Why the covenant of circumcision made to Abraham and his seed and not to others and not upon this ground because he was a believer but because that Christ must come out of his flesh and line therefore to confirm and ratify this to Abraham that Christ should so come and to point out to all the world where they must look for and expect the Christ God doth as much as say in Abrahams loyns you must expect him and no where else For as Christ saith to the woman of Samaria The Jews know what they worship for salvation is of the Jews therefore to be sure the Covenant of worship runs in that line But now Abraham had eight Sons the one by Sarah Gen. 21.2 the other by Hagar Gen. 16. and six sons by his wife Keturah Gen. 25.1 26. to which he gave gifts and sent away to the East Countrey from his son Isaac and this Covenant of Works did belong onely to Isaac and his seed For when God had in Genesis 11.17 7. promised that he would be the God of Abraham and his seed in their generations and give them Canaan in the conclusion of this covenant he begins to speak to Abraham of a Son he should have by Sarah and that she should be the Mother of Nations as in Hebrews 11. Abraham being affected with his Son Ishmael which he then enjoied saith O that Ishmael might live in thy sight as if Abraham should say Lord I understand that thou hast made a Church Covenant with me and my seed after me taking my seed in their Generations into external Covenant with thee O as if he should say that Ishmael might be the seed upon which this Covenant might run where God tells Abraham that he had heard his prayer that he would bless Ishmael with manifold outward blessings otherwise but saith he my covenant shall be with Isaac meaning here that outward covenant of Circumcision where you have Ishmael and the six Sons of Keturah with all their posterity past by in this fresh Election of Isaac and his seed which were only elected in this covenant Therefore the bond child and the six Sons of Keturah though as truly believers children as Isaac was yet they are all dismissed this covenant and privileges of the same The six Sons by Keturah as you have heard before Abraham gave them gifts and sent them into the East Countrey And when Isaac had two Sons in Rebeccus womb God again made a fresh election of Jacob and his seed in their Generations passing by Esau and his seed for saith God There are two Nations in thee and two peoples So he chose Jacob considered as a Nation and past by Esau considered as another Nation for it is plain from those words there are two Nations and two peoples that the Election
Cain and his offering being not in faith God accepted not for all the thoughts of such a man are only evil and that continually till they believe as Gen. ● 5 and 8.21 All the imaginations of all believers till converted are evil and only evil continually Secondly their words are evil Matth. 12.34 O Generation of Vipers how can you being evil speak good word for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh an evil man out of the evil Treasure of his heart brings forth evil things and as their thoughts and words are evil so in like manner their actions are all evil natural actions as eating Job 20.23 When he is eating to fill his belly God shall cast the fury of his wrath upon him and shall rain it upon him while he is eating thus you see natural actions are evil such as eating and drinking for satisfying his hunger and also civil actions are evil as Prov. 21.4 an high look and a proud heart and the ploughing of the wicked is sin if plowing then all his civil actions and also his best duties of worship as his sacrifice is an abomination to God Prov. ●8 9 15.8 Isaiah 1. with 66.4 Upon this ground it must needs be that the Covenant of Grace and eternal life cannot belong to any such persons that do not believe for it is impossible to be in a covenant of Grace and yet not to have persons nor any of their best actions accepted Yea further all mankind are compared to beasts till they believe Job 11.11 Vain man would fain be wise but man is born like a wild Asses Colt with Jeremy 2.23 24. Yea the Lord saith in Revel 21.8 That the fearful and unbelieving and the abominable and murtherers and whoremongers and Sorcerers and Idolaters and all Lyars shall have their portion in the Lake which burneth with fire and brimstone which is the second death Beloved therefore if any have been so deluded as to believe such a notorious error as this is to think that any ever hath been in the Covenant of life but such as are in Christ by faith I desire God may give you repentance for maintaining such a fundamental error as this is And now in the fourth place Answers to such Scriptures as are alleged to prove the baptism of infants I shall endeavour to answer such Scripture allegations and those especially brought in from the New Testament to countenance this error wherein I shall endeavour to take off those false and corrupt Glosses that are usually put upon them wherein men pretend to prove the covenant of grace among the Gentiles to run in the flesh and line of believing parents under the Gospel which I am sure was never yet since the world began nor never shall be with any neither parents nor children but such individual persons that particularly believed in Christ with their own hearts And first let me speak to that in Acts 2.39 An answer to that text Act. 2 39. which is usually pretended to be a proof of the covenant in the flesh the words are these The promise is to you and to your children and to all that are afar off even as many as the Lord our God shall call Now I pray you take notice how evident this Text makes against this error For this Text affirms only the promises to belong to so many even as God shall call and that is a fundamental truth if by promise you understand the gift of the Holy Ghost or remission of sins or both to be promised in this text It is most true that so many as God shall call have an interest both to Christ and all the promises in him and only they for saith the Text Repent and be baptized every one of you for the remission of sins and ye shall receive the Holy Ghost So that remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Ghost it is safe to understand here to be meant that promise that is said to belong to them to their children and to those afar off even so many of them and their children and of those afar off as the Lord our God should call agreeable to the words thus understood is Rom. 8.30 moreover whom he did predestinate them he also called whom he called them he also justified and whom he justified them he also glorified So that justification or remission of sins is here given only to called persons with these agreeth that of Heb. 9.15 For this cause he is the Mediator of the New Testament that by means of death for the redemption of the transgression that were under the first Testament they which are called might receive the promise of the eternal Inheritance So here you see that those that are predestinated to have a covenant of life and the blessing given in that covenant are first called as 1 Pet. 2.9 He hath called us out of darkness into his marvellous light Now this text is plain to prove that those Jews and Proselytes that then heard him and their children and also the ten Tribes new afar off and also the Gentiles the promises did belong to so many of all these as God should call and except Souls be given up to a Spirit of Delusion will any dare to affirm that the promises of the Spirit remission of sins and eternal life do belong to any other Will any be so ignorant as to judge that those promises did belong to the Generation of the Jews whether they were called or not though they continued in unbelief and hardness of heart and impenitency Is not such a corrupt interpretation against Christs words to that very people John 8.24 Except you believe that I am he you shall dy in your sins speaking to these very Jews and doth not John the Baptist say to these John 3. last He that believeth not the Son shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him directing this speech indeffinitely to the generation of the Jews the seed of Abraham such as were in the covenant of Circumcision But if by the children you understand so many of them as God should call whether then at that time or afterwards to the end of the world it is most true that to such of their children the promise of grace did belong But Beloved the Scripture is in nothing more full than in this that the promise of grace belonged not to any of those Iews seed but such as were called for God shuts them under unbelief and because of unbelief they were broken off Rom. 11. if unbelief excluded them from that external relation which before Christs death they then had in the Covenant intailed on the flesh and Christ coming in the flesh and fully exhibiting and putting an end to that covenant no other covenant standing in force in the Church of God but what Christ was the Mediator of these unbelieving Iews of necessity were broken off The promise of remission of sins was so far from running upon the
as two covenants the one a conditional covenant of works the other of grace an absolute covenant as in the 4 5 6 7. verses of that 11. of the Romans and so the main drift here of the Apostle is to hold forth that though God did now cast off from being his Church the carnal seed that were only in the covenant of works this covenant standing no longer in force but growing old and vanishing away as in Heb. 8.13 in which covenant he chose this nation to himself yet nevertheless the Apostle doth affirm that God had a remnant that were elect that should be called of that natural seed of Israel even to the end though for the present the greatest part were hardened in unbelief So that when he saith the branches were broken off we are not to understand that such of them as related to Abraham as a Father or Root of Believers in a Covenant of grace were broken off For then we should hold falling away from and out of a Covenant of life which would be a gross error but the branches were broke off from the Root considered in that national covenant of Circumcision which was a Covenant of works that carnal people might really be in as you heard before This National Covenant now ceasing as I have shewed and being put an end to by Christ he becomming the substance of the same covenant and that being the partition wall at that time between Jews and Gentiles But the Apostle now affirms in Gal. 5.6 and 6.16 That Circumcision availeth not any thing nor Vncircumcision but a New Creature and Faith that worketh by Love therefore all of the Jews that believed not ceased to be members of Gods Church Because now Abraham is no way considered as a Father and a Root in the Gospel Church but as faithful and believing Abraham in a Covenant of eternal life therefore unbelief now cuts off the nation of the Jews Why had not unbelief cut them off many hundred years before The answer is plain for so long as the typical covenant of works stood in force Israel by being of that family or that generation whether they had faith or no or any appearance of grace or no were interessed in that covenant and in the privileges thereof But now when Christ was fully exhibited in the flesh and that covenant ceasing and the covenant of life now only remaining it becomes so that only those branches and that lump of believers the spiritual lump only remain in the Church whether Jews or Gentiles So that if you will seriously mind the scope and drift of the Apostle you shall see that the Lump and the Branches here intended must needs be holy because the First-fruits and Root are holy which is meant those of Gods spiritual elect of the Jews that he would call to the end of the world which since is confirmed in the 28. verse For saith the Apostle As concerning the Gospel they are enemies for your sakes meaning the Gentiles but as touching the election they are beloved for the Fathers sake Not as if God hated these rejected Jews for the sakes of these Gentiles properly or loved a certain number of the Jews for their fathers sake properly But thus for the Gospels sake they became enemies that is the Gospel promise or Covenant having as you have heard before respect to all Nations Gen. 12.3 Gen. 22.18 with Gal. 3.8 Now this Gospel Covenant being not capable to be divulged to all Nations so long as this external electing love to the Nation of the Jews was kept on foot in that Covenant of Circumcision being a partition-wall therefore this bond of favour and frendship being broken in this external covenant they came to be enemies because of the accomplishment of the promises of the Gospel to the Gentiles that those beloved elected of the Jews and ten Tribes even are beloved for their Fathers sake meaning for the promise sake made to their fathers concerning their calling which must needs be accomplished Isaiah 65.23 for they are the seed of the blessed of the Lord and their off-spring with them meaning all such elected off-spring as this 11 of the Romans speaks of the calling For saith the Text As touching the election they were beloved for the Fathers sake so that for the promise sake made to their Fathers they shall in time be actually elected with an eternal electing love But to mind this Scripture further it makes exceedingly against any fleshly covenant running in the fleshly line of the Gentiles because that these words in verse the 20. to the 24. do declare that the Gentiles came to be Abrahams spiritual seed and so a branch of that stock only by faith in Christ that fat Olive For if you are Christs then are ye Abrahams seed and heirs according to promise Gal. 3. last And as it is said the Gentiles are graffed into this stock or root of Abraham contrary to nature it must needs cut off such a conclusion as That all believing Gentiles seed shall come by nature into this Stock It being not only against the whole scope and drift of this place but against the express words which saith the Gentiles are graffed in contrary to nature and stand by faith and further that unbelief broke off the Jews Now this would be a strange riddle in my judgement first to conclude that the whole nation of the Jews were in a Covenant of eternal life and yet never had faith no not so much as visibly for the greatest part of them Secondly That they were broken off from a Covenant of eternal life and why because of unbelief And yet nevertheless believing Gentiles their unbelieving seed in the midst of his unbelief is grafted in This in substance is what is drawn from this text for proving a covenant in the flesh But let any impartially judge how much a shame it would be to wrest Scripture so contrary to the Scope and meaning For this chapter shews that there were two seeds two covenants one of Grace or the Gospel the other of works and that men could not obtain aright to this Gospel Covenant but by vertue of election and that meerly of grace the other covenant of works and the fleshly seed in this Covenant were broke off that is from any privilege comming from Abraham according to the flesh that fleshly covenant being put an end to by Christs being come in the flesh All unbelieving Jews upon that ground cease to be Gods Church much more unbelieving Gentiles for if unbelief broke off the Jew be sure it will as effectually keep out the Gentile as it is clear it doth because they stand by faith only and are graffed in contrary to nature and it is said the Jew if he abide not in unbelief shall be graffed in again From all which it is plain that there is no other way now under the Gospel to come into or stand in the house or Church of God but by faith neither for Iew nor