his law Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord we bring men to the faith The same Apostle Galath 4. 21. when he saw that the Galathians which began to beleeue in Christ notwithstanding not to cleaue vnto him only by faith but to make a mixture of the law with Christ he sets before them this glasse of Gods law or of the couenant of works wherein he layeth open first the miserable bondage of such as are vnder the law next their finall reiection to this end and purpose that they might be mooued by this fearefull speculation to stick to Christ only and to the couenant of grace Hereunto refer those cōminations which we find partly annexed to the couenant of grace in the secōd part of the Euangelicall doctrine partly put to the particular promises instructions exhortations in the 3. part of the doctrine of the Gospell For this is the duty of the moral law of the couenant of works to containe y e beleeuers with threatnings and terrors within the bounds of the grace of Christ and of his Gospell Io. 3. 18. we haue a commination of the law or of the couenant of works added to Note the office of the law to beleeuers the couenant of grace He that beleeueth in him is not condemned this is the conenant of grace He that beleeueth not is condemned already This commination doth properlie appertaine to the law or couenant of works Rom. 8. 13. He conioineth a threatning of the law or couenant of works with a particular promise wherein life is promised vnto sanctimonie If ye liue according to the flesh ye shall die but if ye mortifie the deeds of the bodie by the spirit ye shall liue See Gal. 6. 8. And thus farre of the first question The second question is this whether the morall law which we call the decalogue be abolished to them which The 2. ques whether the lawe be abolished to the regenerat be vnder the couenant of grace I answer by way of distinction The morall law as it commandeth workes done by the strength of nature and as it is the rule of all works of this kinde to wit of such works as be required in the couenant of works that is in respect of the first and proper vse thereof for it concernes properlie the works of nature which make the condition in the couenant of works in this respect I say the morall law it selfe also is abolished to them which are in Christ euen in like manner as the couenant of works is cancelled and of none effect against them For which cause Paul vseth these phrases We be not vnder the law we are dead to the law we are freed from the law to wit either as touching iustification or condēnation And looke how farre the couenāt of works serueth for their vse which be in grace so farre the law of workes is in vse for them And what vse the beleeuers haue of the couenant of works we haue alreadie shewed Againe looke how farre forth the same morall law serues to giue rules for the works of grace and attendeth not on the couenant of works but of grace and of the Gospell so farre it resteth in vse for the seruants of Christ For there is but one rule and law of all good works whatsoeuer whether they proceede from nature or from grace like as there is but one and the same iustice of God euer like it selfe whereof the law of God is a verie expresse image or a liuelie representation Thus then the lawe morall abideth for such as bee vnder the Gospell yet in some respect that is in vse changed for like as all things are become new in Christ Iesus so also the law it selfe after a sort is renued And that the law serueth and is in vse for them which be vnder the couenant of grace it is very cleere by many scriptures This may appeare by those very testimonies which are before produced for the couenant of works and other scriptures many where the works of the law are commended Rom. 13. Loue one another for he that loueth another hath fulfilled the law Gal. 5. 13. 14. By loue serue one another for all the law is fulfilled in one worde which is this Thou shalt loue thy Neighbour as thy selfe See Iames 2. 8. c. And thus farre as we purposed haue we spoken of the couenant of grace CHAP. IIII. Of such as be comprehended in or may truly be saide to be vnder the couenant of God NOW it followeth that we speake briefelie of such as be vnder the couenant of God or if I may so speake confederates with God Euery reasonable creature must of necessitie be liable to one of both couenants either that of works or this of grace For the very Angels are vnder the couenant of works but because the Scripture speaks so sparinglie of them therefore we say this onelie in a worde that they also be vnder the couenant of workes Againe man must bee vnder some one couenant Adam in the state of his innocencie was vnder the couenant of works man after the fal abideth vnder the couenant of works to this day life is promised him vnder condition of works done by strength of nature But if he wil not do well death and the euerlasting curse of God is denounced against him so long as he is without Christ and without the Gospell And being freed from the couenant of works he is not become a libertine or not subiect to Gods people in grace be not law-les libertines any couenant or as it were law-lesse but forth with he is admitted to the couenant of grace and thence forth liueth vnder it Therefore concerning Angels and men it is euident that they are vnder some one couenant It is a doubt indeede concerning Christ whether he were then vnder any couenant when he dwelt among men and did conuerse on earth I answere there be two natures in Christ a diuine and humane Christ as hee is God and the Sonne of God is not vnder the couenant of works or of grace for that he is no creature but the blessed Creator to whom to whose couenant and law euerie creature is and must be subiect But as he is man he is vnder the couenant of works and that in two respects First Christ vnder the couenat of works in what respect in respect of himselfe because he is a creature because he is a seruant and made man and was in the loines of Adam when that couenant of works was first made with him But wee be to speake sparingly of that state of the man Christ which is in respect of Christ himself whether that his humane nature as touching itselfe were vnder the couenant of works whether this nature did purchase for it selfe life eternall by obseruation of the couenant of works Next I say the * Or christ the Mediator hath subiected himselfe in his humanitie to the law for our sake humane nature of Christ is
works and of this kinde of couenant accordingly and as we purposed in this present treatise CHAP. III. Of the couenant of grace IN the free couenant of grace or of the Gospel the first grounde is our mediator Iesus Christ 1. Ground of the couenāt of grace crucified also and dead or which is the same in effect the bloud of the mediator the vertue whereof is twofold The first serues to satisfie the iustice and wrath of God for our sinnes for the breach of that couenant of works The second is to purchase and merit a new grace mercie of God for vs. And this grace or mercie of God 2. Grounde obtained by the bloud of the mediator is y e second ground of the couenant of grace wherby we stand reconciled vnto God and in grace with him Wherefore the first immediat grounde of the couenant of grace is Gods free sauour or mercie whereby mans miserie is presupposed and not nature or any good thing in it For that all our naturall goodnes after the breach of that couenant of works is quite vanished that is to say nature as touching holines iustice and wisdome is vtterlie lost For we are not to approue their iudgment which say that the freedome of will that is the goodnes and holines of nature is much worne and weakened as they speake in this corrupt nature And thus far of the ground of the couenant of grace Vpon this ground I say first of the bloud of Christ next of God free mercie in Christ the couenant of grace vsually so called is founded The first and principall grace promised in this couenant is righteousnes which must necessarily heere haue the first place for after the breach of the couenant of works that one first originall iustice as they call it was quite lost and vniustice did succeede into the place thereof And this iustice which is here promised in the couenant of grace is no inherent righteousnesse as that originall iustice was but it is the righteousnesse of our mediator Iesus Christ which is ours by faith and by the imputation of God for which cause the Apostle cals it the righteousnes of God for without this imputatiue iustice we can not Rom. 3. 20. possiblie stand before the tribunall of God and by the imputation of this righteousnesse are we said to be iustified before God Next after this kinde of righteousnes which is by imputation there is another kind of inherent iustice promised in the couenant of grace euen such a sanctitie and goodnes of nature as was lost in the fall of man and this is but begunne in this life but perfected in another And this inherent iustice is nothing else but life eternal in vs begunne I say in earth and perfected in heauen And this heauenly and spirituall life doth proceede from that righteousnes of Christ which is imputed vnto vs by faith For that righteousnes of Christ is effectuall in vs vnto eternall life by the spirit of Christ who sanctifieth and quickneth vs. And thus far of the promise which is in the couenant of grace Now it followeth that wee see what the condition is of this couenant The verie name of the couenant of grace might seeme to require no condition for it is called a free couenant because God freely The condition of the couenant of grace and as it might seeme without all condition doth promise herein both righteousnes and life for he which promiseth to giue any thing freely he bindeth not to any condition But we are to vnderstand that grace here or the particle freely doth not exclude all condition but that only which is in the couenant of workes which is the condition of the strength of nature and of works naturally iust and good as we may call them which can in no wise stand with Gods free grace in Christ Iesu For neither that freedome of will which doth import some purity holines in nature nor the works of free-will as they call them can agree with the grace of God in Christ Iesus What is the condition then which this word grace or freely will admit in this couenant of grace I answer assuredly none other thē that which may stand with Christ and with Gods free grace and that is faith only which is also by grace for it is Gods free gift Phil. 1. 29. It is giuē vnto you not onely to beleeue in him but also to suffer for his sake hauing Christ first the obiect thereof and next Gods free mercie in Christ for faith embraceth Gods mercie in Christ and makes Christ effectuall in vs vnto righteousnesse and life For this cause Paul Rom. 4. 16. saith our inheritance is by faith that it might come by grace Ephe. 2. 8. Ye are saued by grace by faith and that not of your selues that is as he after expoundeth it not of works so he concludeth that saluation because it is of Gods free grace by faith is the free gift of God Wherefore we see faith stands best with the grace mercie of God as without Rom. 6. 23. which Christ and Gods mercie in him cannot bee effectuall vnto righteousnesse and life For if we receiue not Christ by faith and Gods mercy in Christ Christ and the mercie of God can profit vs nothing vnto iustification and life Howbeit we be heere to remember that whereas God offereth righteousnesse and life vnder condition of faith yet doth he not so respect faith in vs which is also his owne gift as he doth the obiect of faith which is Christ and his owne free mercy in Christ which must be apprehended by faith for it is not so much our faith apprehending as Christ himselfe and Gods mercy apprehended in him that is the cause wherefore God performeth the promise of his couenant vnto vs to our iustification and saluation Wherefore the condition of the couenant of grace is not faith onely nor the obiect of faith only which is Christ but faith with Christ that is The condition of the couenant of grace the faith that shall apprehend Christ or Christ with faith that is Christ which is to bee apprehended by faith Note then briefly this howe these three are one in substance the ground of the couenant of grace the condition of it and the cause wherefore God performeth the condition yet in reason they differ something For Iesus Christ is the ground being absolutely considered without any respect of application vnto vs. But Christ is the condition of the couenant as he is to be applied vnto vs and must be embraced by faith for euerie condition is of a future thing to be done And the cause also of the performance of the couenant is Iesus Christ alreadie embraced and applied vnto vs by faith Wheras Paul then saith that we are iustified by faith his meaning is that wee are iustified by Christ applied vnto vs by faith alreadie in our effectuall calling which by order of nature goeth euer before the
without Christ and therefore doth beget feare and horror within vs. The instrument wherby the spirit doth worke this sorrow in our hearts is the preaching of the law The sum whereof is in that syllogisme concerning the which we haue spoken in the doctrine of faith the proposition of which syllogisme is this Cursed is euery one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of this law to do thē The assumption is by euery mans conscience thus annexed But I haue not continued in them the conclusion therefore is this I am accursed From hence dooth that sorrow or rather that horror of the heart arise or spring not somuch for sin which is in the assumption as for the punishment and feare of the curse which is in the conclusion And this is that which is called the pricke of conscience which by meanes of the conclusion before shewed doth not only prick a wounded mind but also pierce euen through the heart And this legall sorrow if the grace of the Gospell did not put an helping hand betweene it and vs would driue a man into vtter desperation And thus much concerning that first sorrow The very same spirit of God is likewise a principal efficient cause of the latter sorrow but not proceeding as before for now he becommeth the spirit of adoption Wherby we crie Abba Father Rom. 8. that is testifying of our adoption in Christ and therefore doth inlarge both our heart and mouth to call vpon God familiarly as vpon our Father The instrument whereby the holy spirit doth worke this faith in our hearts it is the preaching of the Gospell the summe whereof is contained in that syllogisme concerning which we haue spoken in the doctrine of faith The proposition of this syllogisme is He that beleeueth shal be iustified and shall liue whereupon faith doth assume saying But I do beleeue and concludeth saying Therefore righteousnesse and life pertaineth vnto me In this conclusion there is I confesse matter of ioy of vnspeakable gladnesse but it is as true that there is in it matter of sorrow also which is conceiued after we haue known the mercy of God in Christ to be so great and doth arise in this respect because we haue offended so merciful and so louing a Father It is then a ioy mixt with sorrow with the vnspeakable and glorious ioy of faith hauing ioined with it sighes that cannot be expressed And thus much also of the later sorrow Now let vs see how both these kinds of sorrow belong vnto sound repentance That first sorrow which is of the law and is conceiued by reason of the punishment which followeth sinne I confesse it is no part of this holy change and conuersion vnto God for of it own nature it doth rather estrange vs from God then conuert vs to The terror of the law a preparatiue for the Gospell God and in very deede it dooth altogether alienate the wicked from God as from a terrible iudge Notwithstanding in repentance it hath his vse for it prepareth the elect by giuing them sense of their misery to that grace and mercy which is propounded in the Gospell The latter sorrow which is according to God and is effected by the Gospel is properly a part of repentance and dooth effect that change of the mind and reason before specified And therefore the Apostle saith 2. Cor. 7. that the sorrow which is according to God causeth repentance And thus far of the first part of this benefit which is found to be in sorrow The other followeth which is called properly by the Apostle 2. Cor. vers 7. a Chaunge of the minde For there followeth after that godly sorrow a certaine wonderfull change of the minde of the will and of the heart As touching knowledge and that illumination Second part of repentance of the mind this goes before the sorrow we haue spoken of is an acknowledgment wrought in vs first of sinne and of our misery by the law next of mercy by the Gospell Therefore the chaunge of the mind which followeth this sorrow it pertaines to the faculty or iudgment of reason which also is called the counsell and purpose of the mind Act. 11. 23. He exhorteth them that with one purpose of heart they would cleaue vnto the Lord. And the iudgment or counsell of the mind is chaunged in this sort The mind disalloweth the euill which is committed and alloweth the good hereafter to be practised There are therefore two parts of the change of y e iudgement or counsell the first is the disallowing of the euill committed the second is the The change of the mind hath two branches approuing of the good to be done After the change of the iudgement or counsell of the mind there followeth a change of the wil in this manner The will reiecteth that euill which is committed or it declineth from it and alloweth the good to be done hereafter or inclineth thereunto There are there two parts of this change first a declination from the euil committed secondly an inclination to the good which is or ought to be done After the 2. Change of the will change of the wil followeth the change of the hart which is on this manner The heart hateth and detesteth that euill which it hath heretofore done and it loues and affects the good which hereafter it ought to doe There are therefore two parts of this change the first is the detestation 3. Change of the heart of euill done and committed the second is the loue of that good which ought to be done In general therfore there are two parts of that chang of the mind which is an effect of sorow the first is a change from euill and from sinne committed the second is a change to good hereafter to be practised and followed Commonly these parts are called mortification and viuification but I know not how rightly iustly for mortification and viuification are properly parts of regeneration which doth differ from repentance as shal be seene Regeneration and repentance differ hereafter By that which hath bin already said we vnderstand what be the especial points of repentance from whence it proceeds and wherunto it serueth The point from whence it proceedes is the euill or sinne committed the point to which it tendeth is the good heereafter to bee done Repentance therefore standeth betweene two actions past and future and it doth differ from regeneration for the points thereof are not deeds and actions but qualities to wit the corruption of nature or the old man and sanctitie or the new man but of this we shall entreate afterward when wee come to speake of the difference of repentance and of regeneration Ye see thē after that great sorow how there is a change in the whole mind of man Next ye see by that hath been saide of this benefit of repentance that repentance doth begin from the heart and doth proceede by the reasonable
end vse of the couenant of works is that men by it may be iustified and saued or otherwise condemned The couenant of works had this vse in Adam before his fall that Adam by it might be iustified and liue After the fall it hath the same vse in the vnregenerate elect and reprobate to wit to iustifie and saue them or to condemne them And for as much as it can not iustifie them because of their corruption Rom. 8. 3. it followeth that it must necessarilie condemne them And the verie vnbeleeuing and vnregenerat doe otherwhiles feele this condemnation in themselues Of this vse read Rom. 3. 19. where he sayth that by the law Euery mouth is stopped and made obnoxious to the condemnation of God And of the experience of this condemnation reade Rom. 7. 10. I saith he when the commandement came was dead that is condemned in my conscience so that I felt in my selfe present condemnation and death And albeit this first vse of the couenant of works be cōmon to al vnregenerat elect and reprobate yet this wants not some difference for in the elect the acknowledgmēt of sin and condemnation which they haue by the couenant of works is vnto them a preparatiue to imbrace the couenant of grace but in the reprobate it is the way to extream desperation Thus far of the first vse The second end of the couenant of works is this It 2. End of the couenant of works serues to driue on and to stir vp al beleeuers to march on forwardes in all faith and godlinesse This vse it hath I say in the regenerat who in the legall couenant or morall law doe desire principallie to behold as in a glasse euermore first the holinesse maiestie and iustice of God 1. The vse of the morall law to the beleeuers Ro. 7. 12. Therefore the law is holy and the commandement is holy iust good Next they see here that which they call the originall holines and iustice of man to wit 2. the same which was in the creation which is defined to consist of iustice holines and wisdome Thirdly they behold here that life eternall which was to follow that 3. first originall iustice Fourthly they see that corruption and vnrighteousnes which is now in nature after mans 4. fal but this they see by consequent as we say one contrary is discerned and knowen by another for while we consider first that infinit iustice of God next our original iustice which are properlie discerned by that glasse of Gods law and couenant of works by the light and brightnes of these I say we may take a view of the grosse darknes filthinesse and deformitie of our corrupt nature For this cause it is said Ro. 3. 20. By the law commeth the knowledg of fin Fiftly they see herein Gods wrath kindled against y t deformitie of nature so contrarie both to Gods iustice to mans original iustice For this cause it is said Rom. 1. The wrath of God is reuealed from heauen against all the vngodlines and vnrighteousnesse of men and Rom. 4. The law causeth wrath Sixtly and lastly they behold how present death followeth that wrath of God Ro. 1. 32. Which men though they knew the law of God how that they which commit such things are worthie of death yet not onelie doe the same but also fauour them that doe them Chap. 7. 9 10. When the commandement came I dyed The regenerate when they consider these things in the law and couenant of workes they are forthwith terrified with that heauie spectacle 1. of their sinne 2. of the wrath of God against sinne 3. of eternall death which followeth Gods wrath And then doe they more more relinquish and renounce 1. that legall righteousnes required in the couenant of workes 2. that originall iustice and all opinion of free-will 3. that life and safety which followeth that legal righteousnes of works And hauing renounced all confidence in these thinges with like in deuour they follow hard after Christ by conuersion and faith to this end that they may finde in him first that mercie of God in Christ contrarie to that iustice of God secondlie they seeke for that imputatiue iustice as they call it so contrarie to their owne righteousnes to that originall iustice of the law or of works Thirdly they labour for that sanctification and regeneration that so they may bring forth the fruites of the spirit Fourthly they waite for to attaine that life eternall which is giuen vs of Gods free grace in and by that imputed righteousnes of Christ If we were possest in this life of a perfect faith in Christ A perfect faith we haue not and so of perfect holines then I graunt the beleeuers should not need this terrible glasse of the law and of the couenant of works But because vnbeleefe still resteth in this our nature and the reliques of that inherent contagion still abide in vs and for that so long as wee liue here neither our faith nor holinesse can be perfected Therfore to weaken more more our vnbelcefe and inherent sinne in vs and more and more to increase faith and holinesse we haue euer need of this terrible glasse as a continuall seuere Schoolemaister which euer casting many feares before vs may driue vs to the faith of Christ and to sanctimonie of life Now then seeing it is euident that there is a double vse of the couenant of workes the answer to the question aforegoing is easie For this we auouch that as touching the former vse the couenant of works is abolished to them which are vnder grace To this the Apostle pointeth when he saith Ro. 6. 15. Yee are not vnder the law but vnder grace Gal. 4. that he might redeeme them which were vnder the law Rom. 7. Being dead to the law we are now free from the law 2. Cor. 3. 11. For if that which should be abolished was glorious But as for this second vse it is not abolished This distinction is commonlie receiued that the law legall couenant is abolished as it is a condemning tyrant and not to be abolished as it is a Schoolemaister to chasten vs and with terrours to driue vs vnto Christ For this second vse we haue an example in Paul after his regeneration Ro. 7. 14. c. For when he considers in the glasse of Gods law the spiritualitie that so I may speak the holines and goodnes of the law first next his owne carnalitie to vse that worde and rebellion and lastly death it selfe first he breaks forth into these wordes Miserable man that I am who shall deliuer me from the bodie of this death Next he flieth to the mercie of God in Christ Iesu saying I giue God thanks in Christ Iesus And 2. Cor. 5. 11. Paul sayth of himselfe he was inforced and mooued forwardes to doe duties in his calling because of the terrors of the Lord set downe and offered vnto him in and by
vnder the couenant of works in respect of vs for being vnited to that diuine nature it is become a mediatour for vs to make intercession and peace betweene God offended and man offending For Christ our Mediatour albeit he be God and man in that personal vnion yet was he made subiect to the couenant of works and to the course of the law for vs properly in respect of his humane nature that as the Apostle speaketh he might redeeme vs from the law and the curse of the law See Gal. 4. 4. and 5. After that the fulnesse of time was come God sent his Sonne made of awoman made subiect to the lawe to redeeme them which vvere vnder the lawe And Galath 3. ver 13. But Christ saith he hath redeemed vs from the curse while he was made a curse for vs. Christ therefore our mediator subiected himselfe vnto the couenant of works and vnto the lawe for our sake and did both fulfill the condition of the couenant of works in his holy and good life euen in the highest degree of perfection as being God and man euen that most holy one of God in one person and also he did vndergoe that curse which was denounced against man in that couenant of works if that condition of good and holy works were not kept for in the couenant of works ye haue together with the promise of life to him who doth well a commination of euerlasting death to him who doth not well For this cause Christ our mediator both did wel according to the promise died also according to the curse denoūced Wherefore we see Christ in two respect to wit in doing suffring subiect to the couenant of works to haue most perfectly fulfilled it that for our sake whose mediator he is become It may be demaunded Had it not beene sufficient for our good and to the end he might redeeme vs if he had only liued well and holily and not also so to haue suffered death for vs I answer it had not sufficed for all his most holy righteous works had not satisfied the iustice and wrath of God for our sins nor merited the mercie of God reconciliatiō righteousnes life eternal for vs the reason is for that the iustice of God did require for our breach of Gods couenant that we should be punished with death eternall according to the condition denounced and annexed to the promise of that couenant Therefore no good works of our owne or of any Mediator for vs after the breach of that couenant of works could haue satisfied the iustice of God which of necessity after asort required the punishment and death of the offender or certainly of some mediator in his steed If then all the good holy works of the Mediator could not satisfie that wrath and iustice of God for sin it is cleere they could not meritany new grace or mercy of God for vs. But you will say that the good and holy works of Christ our Mediatour haue wrought some part at least of that satisfaction whereby Gods iustice was appeased for vs and some part of that merit whereby Gods fauour was purchased for vs I answer these works did serue properly for no part of satisfaction or merit for vs for that to speake properly the death of Christ and his passion onely did satisfie Gods iustice and merited his mercie for vs. If anie will yet further demaund May we not diuide the satisfaction and merit of Christ into his doings and suffrings that we may speake on this manner Christ by his death and passion hath satisfied Gods iustice and by his good and holy works he hath merited Gods mercie for vs that so satisfaction may bee ascribed to his death and merit to his workes that the righteousnesse wherewith wee are iustified before God may bee partly the satisfaction which Christ perfourmed by his death for vs partly the merits which he obtained by his works for vs I answer to speake properly the satisfaction and merit which is by the only passion of Christ both He saith we are iustified only by the passiue righteousnesse of Christ was and is our righteousnesse or the satisfactorie and meritorious death of Christ or the satisfaction which was by Christs death or the merit of his death or the obedience of Christ as being obedient to his Father vnto the death the death also of the Crosse to bee short that iustice of Christ which he obtained when in his passion he satisfied his Fathers wrath this is our righteousnesse For we may say that either the death of Christ or his satisfaction or his merit or his obedience or his righteousnesse is imputed vnto vs for righteousnesse For all these are taken for one and the same thing But here it may bee replied If the works of Christ cannot properly procure for vs any satisfaction nor merit nor anie part of satisfaction or merit then it may bee demaunded What hath beene and what is the vse of Christs works or of his actiue obedience or of the obedience of his life I answer that the holinesse of the person The actiue obedience of Christ or the righteousnes and holinesse of his person and life how it is the ground of the satisfactorie and meritorious passion of Christ of Christ and of his natures diuine and humane and of his works is the verie ground or foundation of the satisfaction and merit which wee haue in the passion of Christ that is the excellencie and worthinesse of that person and of his works did cause that his passion was both satisfactorie and meritorious for if this person which suffered had not beene so holy and excellent as also his life so pure and godly it is most certaine that his passion could neither haue satisfied Gods wrath nor merited mercie for vs. For which cause the Apostle Heb. 7. 26. speaking of this ground of this meritorious passion of Christ saith that such an high Priest it became vs to haue which is holy blamelesse vndefiled separate from sinners and made higher then the heauens And thus farre of Christ and how hee may bee said to be vnder the couenant of works And that he was not vnder the couenant of grace the matter is so cleare that it needs no disputation For the couenant of grace was made in him and established in his bloud and the promise in the couenant of grace is made to them which were vniust and dead in sinne because of the breach of that couenant of works and lastly Christ not vnder the couenant of grace the condition in the couenant of grace is faith in Christ the mediator Wherfore if ye respect either the ground or condition or promise of the free couenant Christ can not be said to bee vnder it And thus farre of both couenants of them which are vnder the couenant of God either of works or of grace CHAP. V. A comparison of our iudgment and of the Aduersaries concerning both these
iustification which is by Christ onely by the grace of God only by faith only for al these haue one respect and purpose Obserue then here by the way what the palpable blindnesse of the Papists is in this cleere light of the Gospell Popish blindnes First they see not how nature is plainlie lost as touching sanctitie Secondly they know not the sole grace and mercie of God neither do they vnderstand what the excellency is of Christs merit Thirdly they perceiue not how that couenant of works is abolished to them which are in Christ as touching iustification Fourthly they conceiue not that the only couenant of grace is made with mankinde after the fall speciallie now after the incarnation of Christ in the Gospell and that vnto iustification and life eternall Fiftly they see not that the works of free will as they call them if there were any such to be duties only and testimonies of thankefulnesse according to the first institution of the couenant of works which be done by the strength of nature but ascribe some speciall meritorious vertue vnto them Wherefore we conclude concerning these men that albeit they be not iust of one minde with those old Iewes against whom the Apostle disputed in the Epistle to the Romans yet they hold much on their side striuing to defend that nature is in part good and holy so contending against the pure and only grace of God and to diuide iustification and The popish iustification mans saluation betweene Christ and Gods free grace the vertues and workes of nature whereas notwithstanding these two nature and grace can neuer stand together in the worke of our saluation For whosoeuer shall conioine or make a mixture of grace and nature in this matter shall quite ouerthrow and extinguish grace which either is alone or not at all as Rom. 11. 6. If it be of grace it is no more of works for otherwise grace were no more grace And in the Epistle to the Galathians he doth purposelie dispute against those Iewes which did couple together in the matter of iustification the guifts and works of nature with Christ with the grace of God and with the Gospell And these Iewes as I iudge the Papists seeme most to resemble I meane those Iewes against whom he wrote in the Epistle to the Galathians For in that other epistle to the Romans he disputeth against such Iewes as did openly deny Christ and reiect him but to the Galathians his disputation is against such Iewes as were not content with Christ only but would haue Christ and the law ioined together Thus far of the comparison betweene Paul and vs on the one side the old Iewes and the Papists on the other Now because it will be demanded what Paul thought of the works of regeneration and what we and what the aduersaries thinke also therefore I will touch this question in few wordes Here then some one will say did Paul then in that disputation to the Rom. and to the Galathians oppugne the works of grace and regeneration I answer Paules chiefe purpose in that disputation is against the works of nature which the Iewes thought to be holy and iust and also meritorious he did not reiect the works of regeneration as they be duties and testimonies of thankfulnesse vnto God but in that respect commends them Rom. 6. 7. 8. Chapters and in other places But as touching the cause of iustification he would not haue these workes as we call them of regeneration coupled with the grace of God or with Christ or with faith as anie cause or as part of anie meritorious cause of saluation To this purpose he saith Rom. 4. that Abraham himselfe being regenerate was not iustified before God by anie works of his regeneration And Rom. 6. hauing commended the works of sanctification in the end vers 23. where he attributeth death to the merit of sinne hee doth not there notwithstanding ascribe life eternall to the merit of the works or fruits of sanctification but when he had said that the wages of sin is death he doth clearely auouch it that eternall life is the free gift of God in Christ Iesu In which place if the Apostle had beene of this iudgement that the works of regeneration be in anie respect meritorious assuredly he would not so passe ouer the commendation of the works of regeneration specially for that this heere is principally intended Wherefore the Apostle to the Romans so reiecting the works of nature which the couenant of works requireth yet hee vnderstandeth also all kinds of workes morall and naturall going before grace and faith as also all ceremoniall works and the very fruits of regeneration which follow grace and faith that faith onely Christ only grace only may herein be all in all Thus far of S. Paules iudgment We at this day are of one and the same mind with the Apostle concerning works of regeneration Our aduersaries granting there be such works ascribe too much vnto them for they will not haue them to be duties and testimonies onely of thankfulnesse vnto God but also that they be meritorious causes of that iustification which they call the second iustification Again we are to remember that the aduersaries iudgment concerning works of regeneration is that they proceed not onely from infused grace and first iustice as they speake but also from nature and free-will which works together with that iustice in respect whereof also they account good works meritorious as was before The popish opinion of good works shewed so ascribing their good works in part to that their first grace and in part to free-will And thus farre of this comparison wherby it appeares whether we or our aduersaries haue the better or the more sound iudgment concerning both couenants of the grounds of both nature grace and Christ as also of the effect of both which we call mans iustification And lastly for that this is the most fundamentall point of true religion we may hereby discerne also whether we or the aduersaries haue the religion and worship of God the more purely soundly established amongst vs. CHAP. VI. Of the written Word or of the written Couenant of God THe word in both couenants was for a long time in the world euen from Adams time till Moses vnwritten deliuered as from hand to hand and continued by a liuelie voice for I passe ouer such matters as Ioseph recordes to be ingrauen in columnes before the floud as also the Apocryphals of Henoch And whē as in continuance of time corruptions grew by these traditions and the puritie of the doctrine of the couenant could not thus be preserued and y t God would no longer follow the former course onely he beganne in Moses time to ordaine and to publish another forme to wit this to preserue and to continue the puritie of the celestiall doctrine in written books approued and sealed by diuine authoritie and testimonie the more to commend his written word vnto men
in all succeeding ages God himself with his owne hand did first write in tables of stone the words of the Decalogue Next after this he gaue it in charge vnto Moses that he should afterwards write and record all things which hee receiued at Gods owne mouth and that the people of God might be assured that the bookes of Moses came not by mans will but were giuen by diuine inspiration the Lord sealed 2. Tim. 3. 16 and testified these writings to be his heauenly oracles by manie great wonders before they were written when they were written and after they were written And Moses wrote the Word of both couenants of both I say Legall and Euangelicall but whereas he gaue but as it were the first lineaments of the Euangelicall couenant he set forth the Legall couenant clearely and in full measure For the legall couenant in the bookes of Moses is cleerely recommended and vrged but the Euangelical more darkly set before vs. For which cause all the doctrine of Moses is said to be legall The Law came by Moses Ioh. 1. After Moses God stirred vp his Prophets whose writings also he confirmed with his great miracles and gaue them great authoritie yet were they not to set forth any thing diuers or contrary to the doctrine of Moses and the Patriarches nor to publish any thing but what was grounded in the bookes of Moses but by diuine reuelation they did ad more cleere interpretations as the morning starre of the new testament did more neerely approch These holy men wrote the summe and chiefe heads of their doctrine euen so much as God himselfe thought meete to be reserued for posterity And these records being written were laid vp with the holie books of Moses which were kept in the side of the Arke Iosh 24. 26. Finally after the incarnation of Christ the Euangelicall doctrine or the Gospell first beganne for certaine yeares to be deliuered by voice and to be preached by Christ himselfe and then after by his Apostles And lastly the same was written by the Apostles The works of Gods law and nature are commanded in the bookes of the new Testament And the verie moral law is expounded by Christ himselfe freed from the leauen and corruption of the Pharisees but the works of the law and nature are not recommended to the end that by them men might be iustified and saued but they be commended either to prepare men to intertaine grace offered or to quicken them to proceed and grow in grace receiued as is before shewed Againe the works of regeneration be commanded not for iustification but as testimonies of that iustification which is by faith and of thankfulnes vnto God for which cause so soone as the Apostle hath taught the doctrine of faith he descends to the works of the lawe teaching men that their life and conuersation must be worthie that high calling whereunto we are called in Christ Iesu See Ephe. 4. 1. 1. Thess 2. 12. But faith in Christ is that which is principally required in all the books of the new Testament And thus farre generally of the written word of the couenant CHAP. VII The number of the controuersies which are concerning the written Word and of the first controuersie whether the Scripture be the word of God THere be two kinds of controuersies concerning the holy Scripture The first kind is of such controuersies as bee more essentiall that is which concerne the very essence if I may so speake or being of the Scripture The second kind is of those controuersies which bee more accidentall and doe not so neerely concerne the essence of the Scripture Of the first kind there are ten controuersies or questions the first is Whether the Scripture Propheticall and Apostolicall bee the word of God The second is How it may appeare that this Scripture is Gods word The third is Of the antiquitie of it The fourth is Of the perspicuity or cleerenes of it The fift is Of the simplicitie or plainnesse of it The sixt is Of the viuacitie quickening power or life of it The seuenth is Of the simple euident necessitie of it The eight is Of the perfection sufficiencie thereof that it is sufficient and perfect in it selfe without all vnwritten verities or traditions whatsoeuer The ninth is Whether the Scripture may bee the iudge to determine all controuersies The tenth is Whether the Scriptures Propheticall and Apostolicall must haue the chiefe place of excellency and be in authoritie aboue the Church As for those eight controuersies which follow the two first they are touching the properties of the holie Scripture and these when we shall haue proued that the Scripture is Gods word will appeare euidently for they are necessary consequents of that Theoreme For grant we this that the Scripture is Gods word then these things must follow necessarily first that it is most ancient secondly most cleere thirdly most simple or pure fourthly most powerfull fiftly most necessarie sixtly most perfect seuenthly the greatest best iudge of all controuersies without exception eightly most excellent But for as much as the aduersaries denie these eight properties therefore as is a foresaid there is of euerie one of them a speciall controuersie We are then to handle these controuersies in order and first of that which by due right naturally is to haue the first place Whether the Scripture be the word of God The Aduersaries graunt generally that the holy Scripture is the word of God but when they are brought from the generall to a speciall they break from vs. To speake more plainely the word of God at this day is twofold in the Church of God 1. immediate 2. mediate I call that the Gods written word immediate word of God which doth proceede immediately out of Gods owne mouth and that I call mediate which the Lord speakes by his preacher or Minister We hold then and auouch that the holie Scripture is that immediate and primarie word of God and to bee vnto vs in steed of that first immediate and liuely voice of God himselfe yea that it serues vs in place not only of that liuely voice of God but also of the secret and insearchable mind of God and of Gods vnspeakeable mysteries Our arguments are these 1. For that this is the verie will of God They haue Moses saith he and the prophets that is the bookes of Moses and the Prophets Luk. 16. 29. 2. If we had nothing to supply the defect of the liuely voice of God then doubtlesse our state were worse then that of the old Church of the Iewes which had the oracles of God but it is against all light of reason so to Rom. 3 1. 2. affirme 3. Our third reason is this The first ground of our faith must be either the liuely voice of God or the verie mind and counsell of God or something to supply the want of Gods liuely voyce and of the secret mind of God which must also be
publike administration of Gods seruice and worship being performed of all or most Churches in one tongue to wit the Latine this might serue well for the preseruation of the vnitie of faith To this I answer this serues notably for the continuance and increase of vnbeleefe and ignorance Againe our verie experience teacheth by Gods good blessing in these times that notwithstanding the great variety of tongues in the reformed Churches yet they agree well to God be praise in the vnitie of faith Next they reason from the little good which hence ensueth as they imagine It profits the people nothing at all that the Scriptures be read in the vulgar tongues for they vnderstand not any sentence of Scripture albeit they know the words To this I answer Euerie one of the vnlearned if they come to heare the Scriptures with Gods feare and reuerence they shall reape and receiue some profit by it Againe from another danger which may happen they reason thus The reading of the Scriptures in a knowne tongue may more hurt then profit the people for deuotion hath rather decreased then increased since publike prayers or seruice of God hath beene celebrated in popular tongues I answer the consequent is not good The sacred Scripture read in the mother tongue hurts manie therfore it is not so to be read at all because accidentally and through the default and corruption of the people it hurts and profits not So the preaching of the Gospell is the sauour of death vnto death vnto manie therefore the Gospell is not to bee preached Furthermore be it knowne that this is no religion nor true pietie which is so coupled with ignorance but a damnable superstition when as the sacred Scriptures are read and prayers administred in a strange and vnknowne tongue Thus far these three Arguments from the finall causes and effects Againe they reason from an inconuenience first on this wise If the scriptures must bee read in the vulgar tongue then translations must bee renewed in euery age for auncient words weare out of vse and this is inconuenient I answere what losse is it if translations be reuised and renewed in euery age for the whole translation needes no renuing but some words which happily are become obsolete and out of vse Againe an other euill which might follow this conclusion is this The Pope vnderstandeth not all vulgar tongues But the publique prayers must be celebrate in a language which the Pope knoweth Ergo. I answere it is not necessarie that prayers be in that tongue which the Pope knoweth This they proue * Vne concesso errore mille consequuntur because he is the vniuersall Bishop And this I deny also Wherefore there is no domage shal follow if publique prayers be contained in a language which the Pope knoweth not And thus far the 2. question The 3. question followeth whether it is lawfull for the lay people as they call them or the vulgar sort to read the holy scriptures We auouch that it is lawfull for euery one euen of the basest of the people to read the holy Scriptures For this point see Deut. 6. Chap. 11. c. and 17. c. Iosh 1. c. and 10. c. 5. Search the Scriptures saith the Lord Christ Acts. 17. the men of Berea searched the Scriptures and for this cause are commended by the holy Ghost Matth. 4. The example of Christ who resisted the Deuill with no other weapons but of the scripture teacheth vs that the scripture ministreth vnto vs such a furniture as euery man must be prouided of to withstand Sathan in his assaults against vs. Lastly this is prooued by the practise of the Church For wherefore were the scriptures in the old church translated into so many popular languages but that they might be read vnderstood of the people And this is our iudgement in few words What say the aduersaries Some yeares past they taught it was not lawfull at all for any of the common and lay people as they vsuallie tearme them to reade the holy Scriptures Afterwards when they saw how odious Vide Censuram Coloniensem this was they changed their minde and now forsooth they say it is lawful to read the scriptures but with conditiō if it be permitted permitted I say of whom They answer by the Pope his Bishops or inquisitors I demaund what of these only They answer not of these only but of them with the aduertisemēt of the parish Priest or confessor Well I vnderstand who be to permit the reading of the holy scripture now I aske to whom is this permitted They answer not to all indifferently but only to such as the parish Priest whom they call the Curate shall well discerne both by their confession and by their whole cariage of their life to be a true Catholick that is a stubborne or stiffe-necked Papist I see then to whom they yeeld thus far the reading of the scriptures I demand in the next place what translations be allowed them They answer they will not haue them to read all translations indifferently but such only as some Catholicks haue published such as at this day the English Rhemish translation of the New Testament is Thus far briefly of that permission which hath so decreed the condition of this libertie of reading the scriptures And this is their meaning according to the decree of Pius Quartus the Pope which decree is confirmed also by the councel of Trent commended by the Rhemists in the preface of their English translation And this is Bellarmines iudgment who differeth in words only a little from the former popish assertion but in matter and purpose is the same in effect for what difference is there if there be no permission at all to be thus permitted with such a condition as is aforeshewed And thus of the 3. question and as touching the controuersies which are moued at this day concerning holy scripture I remember not any that we haue left vntouched We haue therefore spoken of the word of God which is the word of both couenants as also of the sacred scripture which is a certaine meane wherby it pleased God to manifest his word and wil vnto men It resteth now that wespeake of sinne and of mans miserie CHAP. XXIIII Of sinne in generall THE common place of sin as also the former before handled is subalterne to the place or generall head of our calling For calling is the transferring of a man out of the state of sin What our calling is and miserie into the state of righteousnesse and happinesse Therefore we shall speake of sinne first in generall after we shall come vnto his kindes or partes The name of sin signifies a certaine thing compounded of his owne matter and forme The matter of sinne to speake thereof in the first place is a certaine being or thing that is and that being is not a substance but an accident and What sin is that is either a qualitie or action and this
is he who heareth the word and by and by receiues it with ioy yet hath no roote in himselfe but is for a time and when persecution and trouble ariseth because of the word is offended presentlie To the same purpose reade I. uk 8. 13. Of this faith see also Heb. 6. 4. 5. For it cannot be that they which haue beene once inlightened and tasted of the good word of God and of the powers of the world to come if they fall awaie c. To conclude of this faith ye haue Ioh. 5. 35. He namely Iohn was a burning and a shining candle and ye would for a time haue reioiced in his light The reason of the name is this it is called Temporarie because it endures but for a time and it endureth but for a time because it hath no roote It hath the same obiect with iustifying faith which is properly so called namely Iesus Christ with his benefits offered in the word of the Gospell and in the Sacraments wherein it differs from historicall faith which hath for the obiect thereof the vniuersall truth It hath The subiect of a temporary faith the same subiect with iustifying faith for it hath it scat both in the mind and also in the will and heart Last of all it hath as many parts of nature as the iustifying faith hath For it is a knowledge of the vnderstanding conioyned with both the iudgements of the mind it is the apprehension of the wil or heart whereout follweth also the stirring of the affections as of ioy delight c. But that I may speake a little more largely of this apprehension which is in Temporarie faith and of this ioy First it is certaine by the scripture that these things are in the Temporarie faith For Christ saith in Matth. That hee which is but for a time doth receiue the word and that with ioy And in Ioh. The Iewes are said to haue reioiced for a time in the light of Iohn Baptist And to the Hebr. How the historicall and temporary saith differ one fro another and both from the iustifying there is attributed to this faith not onely the enlightening of the mind but also the taste of the heart and that performed not onely by the word but also by the Spirit for he saith They which haue beene made partakers of the holy Ghost Therefore in Temporarie faith there is indeede a kind of apprehension there is indeede a certaine ioy wherein Temperarie faith differeth from historicall faith For in historicall faith these things are not indeed but he that hath it doth faine and dissemble and lie in his outward profession that he hath these things wherfore he is a shamelesse hypocrite But hee that hath temporarie faith hath these things indeede apprehension I say and ioy after a certaine manner neither doth he so faine or sie as he that hath an historical faith yet he is an hypocrit because this apprehension and this ioy are not sincere albeit after a certaine manner they be true I say they are not sincere because they are not for that cause for which they should be that is they are not for Christ himselfe offered in the preaching of the Gospell they are not for Gods sake they are not for his glory nor for those heauenly benefits of Christ his righteousnes and eternall life but they are for other causes as for the newnesse of the Gospell which is to bee vnderstood in that place Ioh. 5. 35. He was a burning a shining candle and ye would haue reioiced for a time in his light namely for the newnesse of the matter Secondly they be because of a licentiousnesse to sinne which men by and by snatch to themselues vpon the hearing of free iustification by Christ and Christian liberty To conclude they are for riches honours and other commodities of this life Now seeing the Temporizing professor hath these causes propounded to himselfe in hearing and receiuing the word and in reioycing it must needes be that these are not sincere in him For nothing is done sincerely vnlesse it bee Synceritie done in respect of the glorie of God And herein differs Temporarie Faith from iustifying For the iustifying Faith doth all things for Christ himselfe for God himselfe for the heauenly and spirituall benefits of Christ as much as it can for mans infirmity Out of this therfore it followes that the Temporizer is also an hypocrit seeing he is not sincere and that the Temporizer is an hypocrit temporary faith is hypocriticall seeing it is not sincere Out of that againe that it is not sincere another thing followeth namely that it is not sound firme for nothing that is not sincere can be sound For those causes vpon which it depends are not sound as for example those worldly things as riches honours of the world c. In which thing temporary Faith differeth from iustifying Faith for iustifying Faith as it is sincere so it is sound For of that it is said Col. 2. 5. And the stedfastnesse of your The difference betwene a temporary faith and true iustifying faith faith in Christ For iustifying Faith is as it were a solide body consisting of three dimensions length bredth depth for it possesseth the depth and lowest of the heart but temporary Faith is not a body with three dimensions but only a surface sticking in the vpper part of the heart for it is not either a sound light enlightening all the heart or a sound apprehension arising from the bottome of the heart or to conclude a sound ioy possessing the whole body but all these things are only superficiall in the temporary Faith Whereupon Heb. 6. that apprehension of heauenly things which is therein is compared to tasting or sleight touching seeing that the heart doth but as it were with the tip of the tongue lightly tast those heauenly things and not quite drinke them vp and receiue them into it selfe Againe out of this that temporarie Faith is not sound another thing also followeth namely that it doth not endure for euer but onely for a time For that which is not sound is not durable and perpetuall but only temporary Wherein also it differeth from iustifying faith which as it is sound so it is perpetuall and constant From this property this faith tooke her name and was called temporary now this property doth presuppose the two other going before namely first that it is not sounde secondly that it is not sincere albeit it bee in some sort true While I consider somewhat more diligently of the cause of these three properties I found that it is not to be imputed so much to those outward things for which this faith doth apprehend Christ in the word and reioiceth in him as to the inward euill affection of the heart For the heart of man as Christ sayth is stony ground that is it is neither good nor honest of it owne nature Now we measure this goodnesse and honesty
chiefly by simplicity and sincerity which is opposed to hypocrisie and dissembling Therefore a deepe hypocrisie which is contrary to sincerity possesseth the heart of this man Now the heart so affected doth beleeue apprehend and reioice not sincerely for a true cause for which it ought to do these things but for other worldly causes It followeth therefore that the cause of these euils doth lurke in the heart Wherefore if any man will not be a temporizer A good admonition for a temporizer let him aboue all things looke to his heart and sift and examine it diligently night and day so long till hee feele that the faith of Christ takes roote in the bottome of his heart and doth throughout possesse the whole heart as much as may be Out of these things which we haue spoken touching the properties of this faith and of the cause of them a marke may be taken whereby any one may discerne true iustifying faith from temporary And that is in a word sincerity in doing in beleeuing in apprehēding in reioicing Synceritie in doing all things throughout the whole course of the life Now sincerity is knowne by this if all things be done and performed by vs for God and for Christ whether those things be of small or great moment Whether ye eate or drinke or whatsoeuer ye doe doe all to the glory of God 1. Cor. 10. 31. By these things which haue beene spoken it is easie to gather a definition of this faith For Tempor F. defined temporary faith is a knowledge in the minde and an apprehension in the will of Christ with all his benefits but yet tēporary or enduring but for a time And thus much of temporary faith The miraculous faith followeth which is the third vnproper signification of the word of faith Touching this faith these are testimonies Matth. 17. Yf ye haue faith as a graine of mustard seed 1. Cor. 13. If I had all faith so that I could remoue mountaines The reason of the name is this 4. Miraculous faith It is termed miraculous from the effect of it because it is powerfull to doe miracles The obiect thereof is not the bare generall word of God but rather a special promise or reuelation made to some one touching the doing of some certaine miracle Now that the bare generall word sufficeth not it appeareth hereby for because many holy men haue had faith in the generall word yea they haue iustifying faith in the promise of grace and yet could doe no miracles Simon Magus beleeued by an historicall faith in the generall word and yet he could do no miracles therefore hee would haue bought this facultie with money for a price Act. 8. 31. Vnlesse therefore vnto the generall word there be added a speciall promise or reuelation it is no miraculous faith which is a certaine speciall and extraordinarie gift of the Spirit Wherein the Aduersaries do erre verie much who thinke that the generall word sufficeth for this to make a miraculous faith The subiect of it The subiect of a miraculous faith is the mind first vnderstanding and withall iudging the speciall promise and then the will or the heart apprehending that which is promised The parts of the nature thereof are a knowledge with a iudgement of the mind and an apprehension with the will and heart Out of these things now spoken I gather this definition of this Faith that Miraculous faith is a Miraculous faith defined knowledge in the mind and an apprehension with the will of a speciall promise or reuelation for the doing of a miracle Thus farre of miraculous Faith and in summe of the true doctrine of faith CHAP. XXXI The opinion of the Aduersaries concerning Faith IT followeth now that we see briefly what the aduersaries doe hold touching Faith First they do not acknowledge the diuers significations of Faith they entreat onely of one faith and that they terme iustifying that is as they expound the word that The Popish opinion of Faith which disposeth vs to iustice being to be infused after in the time thereof Thus thinks Bellarmine in his Treatise touching faith In this doctrine of faith which they terme iustifying they differ from vs first about the obiect of it Indeede they doe not denie that the obiect of faith is the mercie of God in Iesus Christ offered in the Gospell that is that it is the Gospell and the promises of grace concerning Christ and Gods mercie in him But they will haue the obiect to be not onely the word of the Gospell but equally the vniuersall word of God To confirme this opinion of theirs they alleage that definition of faith which is set downe Heb. chap. 11. 1. Faith saith the Apostle is the ground of things that are hoped for and the euidence of things which are not seene This say they is the definition of iustifying faith But this definition stretcheth it selfe not onely to Christ to the promises of God and to the Gospell concerning him but also to the whole word of God to all things that are contained in the word of God For example it stretcheth it selfe to the word of God which is concerning the creation of the world as is euident by vers 3. which followeth in the same chap. By faith we vnderstand that the world was ordained by the word of God Hence they conclude that iustifying faith hath the whole word for the obiect of it But to this we answer that not onely iustifying Faith is defined by the Apostle in that place but that that definition of Faith is common to all the significations of faith as is plaine enough by that induction of examples which followeth in that place and chapter Neither is that their argument which they gather out of the coherence of the text of anie force They say that that faith is defined of which the Apostle spake in the last verses of the chapter going afore Now the iust shall liue by faith c. But there the Apostle spake of iustifying Faith therefore heere in the 11. chap. iustifying faith is defined I answer this definition I confesse doth belong to iustifying faith but not to that alone but it is commō to it with other significations of Faith as with historicall Heb. 11. 1. A generall definition of faith common to all kinds of faith faith and miraculous c. as is euident by the induction that followeth Seeing therefore that this definition doth not onely belong to iustifying faith it followeth that out of this definition they get not that they would haue namely that the obiect of iustifying Faith is equally the vniuersall word of God Therefore let the obiect thereof properly be that which it apprehendeth and that is the Gospel and the promise concerning Christ Secondly they dissent from vs about this same speciall obiect namely the mercy of God in Christ For we say and affirme that the obiect of iustifying faith is not onely a generall mercy
nor only a generall promise touching Christ but much rather a speciall mercy and a speciall promise that is mercy offered in the Gospel not in common to all but peculiarly to me or to thee For albeit the promises and sentences of the Gospell be conceiued generally yet it is certaine that they are to be receiued particularly by euery one as if they were spoken to euery one in seuerall as for example Ioh. 3. the promise of the couenant of grace is conceiued generally in these words Whosoeuer beleeueth in the Sonne shall not perish but haue life euerlasting This promise is indeed generally conceiued but it is to bee vnderstood particularly and singularly by euery one as if it had beene spoken to me or to thee If thou beleeuest in the Sonne thou shalt not perish but haue euerlasting life The Apostle 1. Tim. 1. doth vnderstand this generall sentence namely that Christ Iesus came into the world to saue sinners no otherwise then if it had beene pronounced onely concerning himselfe whereupon he doth apply it particularly vnto himselfe assuming by name that he is the sinner and concluding How the beleeuer is to make a syllogisme in forme at the least secretly that Christ came into y e world to saue him by name We may make trial of this thing by those promises that are made specially in the Gospell to saue certaine men as to the man sicke of the palsie Matt. 9. to the woman that was a sinner Luk. 7. to the Adultresse Ioh. 8. to Zacheus Luk. 19. to the thiefe Luk. 23. For the Spirit of Christ when any generall promise or sentence touching Christ and his mercie is alleaged doth no lesse particularly now apply the same to euerie man by speaking inwardly to the heart of euery one then at that time Christ did by his liuely voice apply those particular promises to some certaine persons Roman 3. Whē the righteousnes of God is said to belong to al beleeuers and that without distinction it is plainly signified that that righteousnesse is offered to men of euerie sort and condition and also propounded to euery seuerall person 1. Tim 2. after he hath admonished that wee are to pray for all men he addeth that God will haue all men to be saued and come to the knowledge of the truth Out of which it followeth that in the publishing of the Gospell God hath respect not onely of all men in common but also distinctly of euery seuerall person which regard also he will haue vs to haue in our prayers What neede many words For if there were nothing els that did The mercie of God in Christ offered generally to all the world particularly applied to euery one by the Spirit is the obiect of iustifying faith teach this the administration of the Sacraments alone hath force enough in it to proue that the mercy of God in Christ is offered specially to euerie one For in both the sacraments the seales of that mercy are giuen and offered to euery one seuerally And let this suffice to shew that speciall mercy as it is called is the obiect properly of iustifying Faith against which our aduersaries hold The obiect of iustifying Faith being made to bee a generall mercy it followeth that faith in the opinion of our aduersaries is generall and not a speciall assent For seeing there is only a generall mercy propounded generally to the Church and not offered particularly to the seuerall members therof how can any particular man challenge that particularly to himselfe which is not spoken and offered particularly But we affirme that iustifying faith is that whereby euery beleeuer doth particularly not onely assent to the promise that it is true in it selfe but also apprehends with the heart the promised thing and applies it properly to himselfe For this being made plaine that the mercie of God was particularly offered to euery one it followeth that faith must be particular But for the proofe hereof there are almost infinite testimonies of the Scriptures we will be content but with a few Gal. 2. 20. And the life that I now liue in the flesh I liue by faith in the Sonne of God who loued me and gaue himselfe for me Marke here he doth by faith peculiarly apply to himselfe the Sonne of God and his life his loue and his death Neither is there any cause why any one should say that this might be lawfull for the Apostle who had some extraordinary reuelation of that thing but that it is not lawfull to the common sort of Christians in as much as the Apostle doth in this place beare the person of euery Christian and beleeuing man Rom. 8. For I am perswaded that neither death nor life c. Marke here that speciall trust and particular application is pointed at by the verbe of the singular number Beside that which is cited out of Habakuck by the Apostle The iust shall liue by faith doth sufficiently insinuate a speciall faith for thereby is signified that euery iust person doth liue by his faith that is by a speciall assent to and application of the righteousnesse of God in Christ Matth. chap. 9. a particular faith is commended to the man sicke of the palsie to whom it was saide Sonne be of good comfort thy sinnes be forgiuen thee Ioh. 3. when it is said He that beleeueth in the Sonne hath eternall life that verie same speciall faith is signified which is when euerie one doth assent particularly to and apply to himselfe euerlasting life offered to himselfe What neede manie words The same thing doth that verbe I beleeue which is found in the Apostles Creede teach For to beleeue is there specially and particularly to beleeue Out of the generall mercy and generall faith of the aduersaries followeth the vncertaintie of particular faith and of Gods peculiar grace which they defend For it is easily discerned that vncertaintie doth follow necessarily out of that generality first a doubtfulnesse of mercy then of faith For when as mercy is propounded and offered not specially but generally and when there is onely a generall assent of faith how can I be certaine of that mercy which pertaines not certainly by name to me But that there is a certainty of faith against which they hold first it easily appeareth by those things which haue The certainty of faith beene spoken of Gods speciall mercy and speciall faith For seeing mercy is offered particularly to thee and to me c. and I againe assent particularly to it now am I certaine of that mercy that it is mine specially seeing I doe already by faith and speciall application possesse it For Christ dwelleth in our harts by faith that is we now possesse Christ and doe enioy him as present Of this speciall certainty see Rom. 4. 16. The inheritance is of faith that it may be by grace to the end the promise may be firme to the seed And in the same Chapter ver 18. Which Abraham against hope beleeued
reason but for the authoritie of him that speaketh this assent is is called Faith but it doth not require that the knowledge of that thing wherto assent is giuē should go before it being content only with the bare authoritie of the speaker Out of this distinction difference of assent say they it followeth that in faith there is no need of knowledge seeing faith is an assent whereby we do agree to the truth of some sentence being induced not by any reason or cause but by the authority of the speaker To this reason we answer first we do grant this difference of assents but we denie that that assent which is yeelded because of the authoritie of the speaker hath no need of knowledge to go before it For that it may be iustifying Faith to vs it is required that that which is spoken by God himselfe be some manner of way vnderstood by vs. For God doth not require that of vs that we should assent to his word and voice because of the bare authority of him that testifieth when as we vnderstand them not at all Secondly they reason out of that definition of faith Heb. 11. Faith is the ground of things that are hoped for and the euidence of those things that are not seene Here say they we see faith of things vnknowne namely of such things as are to be hoped for as are not seen But say I these two words * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ground and euidence do argue sufficiently that those very things which are hoped for and not seene are in the meane time in some sort present and seene of vs. Whereupon Paul 2. Corinth chap. 4. saith Why we looke not on those things which are seene but on those things which are not seene Heere you see that The popish implicite faith euen those things which are not seen nor obiect to these eyes of our bodies are yet seene and beheld with the spirituall eyes of our faith And this is their opinion touching the knowledge of faith which tendeth to this purpose to establish that faith which they terme implicit or infolded faith Concerning that assent which we said is the 2. part of iustifying faith they do place the nature of faith only in that assent which is yeelded in regarde of the truth of a thing for they speake nothing of the assent or iudgment of goodnes and they make that same iudgment of truth which they hold to be only general namely wherby one doth iudge that some sentence is true not of himselfe but in generall of the whole Church when as notwithstanding that iudgement aswell of truth as of goodnesse which is the propertie of faith is rather particular yea a very peculiar grace which in the Scripture is called that ful assurance as we haue said before 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Touching the third part of faith which we tearmed the confidence of the heart they doe not acknowledge it For they say that confidence is nothing els but hope strengthened and a certaine effect of faith whereas notwithstāding confidence which the Greeks tearme 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a certain motiō of the wil or hart not expecting but in present apprehending some good and depending therupon and reioicing therein as present Furthermore Confidence and faith of the same roote in Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is faith and affiance are of the same roote For both of them come from the verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifyeth to perswade Besides the verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is taken euery where by the Apostle for to be perswaded to beleeue and not to hope Rom. 8. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is I am perswaded that neither life nor death nor things present nor things to come c. Phil. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I am perswaded that he that hath begun in you a good worke c. 2. Cor. 5. Knowing therfore the terror of the Lord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we perswade or draw men to the faith I graunt that the name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is some times taken for confidence which is a consequent of faith and a certaine property of it for it comes to passe that he which beleeueth or trusteth dooth depende on him in whom he placeth his trust Of this signification of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 read Eph. 3. 12. In whom we haue freedome and accesse with confidence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by faith in him Out of these things which we haue spoken it is easie to gather a definition of faith according to their opinion who take iustifying faith to bee nothing els then that whereby euery one doth in generall assent to the truth of the word of God that for the authority of the speaker A popish definition of faith which definition what els is it I pray you then a generall notion of faith and such as is common to all the significations of faith which we set downe before From this definition of iustifying faith they gather that truly that iustifying faith may be in euery wicked and most hainous A popish definition of faith sinner For in him this generall assent may be which cannot be denyed to the very deuils as Iames witnesseth The Deuils saith he beleeue and tremble and yet they call this iustifying and true faith though not liuing For they distinguish betwene true and liuing faith True faith they say is euen that which worketh not by loue yea though it be dead but a liuing fatih they terme that which worketh by loue as by hir forme and not as an instrument whereupon they terme this by another name formed faith But we do vtterly deny this distinction of true and liuing faith for we take true faith and liuing faith for one and the same euen as one and the same man is true and liuing and as true or liuing man is so termed from his soule or form so also true or liuing faith is so tearmed frō hir soule or form which consists in ful assurance trust as we haue said without which faith is nothing els but a carcase euen as a man without a soule is not so much a man as a carcase and dead body But they indeuour to proue out of Iames. 2. last verse that euen dead faith and not liuing is neuerthelesse true faith As the body is to the soule so is faith vnto works but the body without the soule is a true body albeit not liuing therefore faith without works is a true faith although not liuing I answere that this is a sophisticall argument for the comparison of the body and faith which Iames maketh is not in the truth but in the death of thē and Iames assumes and concludes out of that proposition But the body without the spirit is dead wherefore also faith without workes is dead For betweene faith and the body this is the difference one and the same body
attained the temporary faith whose sorrow also doth arise from the Gospel and the acknowledgment of the mercy of God in Christ and the change of the mind vnto good is in some sort for the good it selfe for they tast after a sort the sweetnes of God in Christ and are delighted in it And as concerning the amendment of outward life that also is in them a little longer then in those before described They do also returne and relinquish many sins Of this kind it seemes Herod was of whom it is written Mar. 6. 20. Herod feared Iohn knowing that he was a iust and an holy man and he receaued him when he heard him he did many things and heard him gladly And thus far of these 3. steps of impious men in repentance here also I end the doctrine of sound repentance CHAP. XXXVI What the iudgement of Papists is of Repentance IT followeth now that we consider what the Papists do thinke of their Penance for they reiect the very name of Repentance T heir errours are manie which they hold we will take view of some few of them briefly confute them first they say that Repentance is a Sacrament But A Sacrament I aske if it be a Sacrament what sensible signe hath it They answer that the signe is partly the act of y e penitent person partly the words of the Priest whereby the penitent is absolued But I answer in a sacrament there must be not only an audible signe but also a visible there must be also a certaine element and not a ceremonie onely as in Baptisme and the Supper of the Lord. Besides the ceremonies and rites there are elements water bread and wine Concerning this errour this shall suffice Secondly they affirme that the vse of Repentance is this to abolish mortall sinne committed after Baptisme 2. Errour and to make him who of a friend through sinne was become Gods enemie the friend of God againe that is a iust man To this I answer To the restoring and repairing of man who hath sinned after Baptisme we haue no need of any other Sacrament then Baptisme the force and vertue whereof is perpetuall and effectuall throughout the whole life of man for the washing away of sinne to regenerate men for it is false that in Baptisme these sinnes onely are washed away which were committed before Baptisme seeing Baptisme reacheth to the whole life of Baptisme effectuall to the regenerate all his life man and the remembrance thereof is effectuall for the remission of sinnes and our regeneration euen then when a man giues vp the Ghost and departs this life Thirdly they say that the Repentance which was in the old Testament and before the resurrection of Christ 3. Errour is not the same with the repentance which followed the resurrection of Christ for that was no Sacrament but this is I answer that the doctrine of Repentance and of our conuersion to God is one and the selfe same which all the Prophets Iohn Baptist Christ before and after his incarnation and the holy Apostles haue preached Fourthly they say that the principall efficient cause of Repentance is free-will and the strength of nature stirred 4. Errour vp by a preuenting grace and that grace is but onely our helper working together with nature or free-will I answer that it is cleane contrarie for the Spirit or grace of God is the principall efficient cause of Repentance but the instrument are the faculties and powers of the mind not such as they are by nature but as they are sanctified by the Spirit which may appeare euen by this testimonie Ier. 31. Conuert me O Lord I shall be conuerted where the principall efficiencie cause of the work is giuen to the Lord himselfe and to his grace But of vs it may well be said that we become actiue in repentance being acted and moued by the holy Ghost Fiftly they diuide Penance essentially into the act of the Penitent as the matter and absolution of the Priest 5. Errour as the formall cause I answer that there is no necessitie why repentance should be so parted betweene the penitent or confessing sinner and the Priest absoluing For the sinner who doth repent him of his sinne may priuately confesse vnto God and of him also bee absolued without any conceiued or set forme of absolution by the Priest We repent daily and yet there is no need that the matter should be dayly so perfourmed by the sinner repenting and the Priest or minister absoluing Wherefore repentance is not to be restrained to this forme and dialogue or communication which must passe as they say betweene the sinner repenting and the Priest absoluing Sixtly they diuide Penance materially into Contrition 6. Errour Confession and Satisfaction for these three parts doe as it were appertaine to the acts of their Penitents which be the matter of their Sacrament of Penance I answer concerning Contrition which is nothing els but a sorrow of heart we verily admit of it but without anie opinion of merit which they attribute thereunto And as touching Confession first we say that it is not Signes of Repentance properly any part of Repentance but an outward signe of Repentance which is wrought inwardly in the mind for amongst the signes these are numbred confession of the mouth teares humbling of the bodie and other actions of like kind Againe we say that their auricular Confession wherein all euen the priuate sinnes of a man must be numbred as neere as they can remember and whispered into the eare of the Priest we affirme I say that such a Confession is the inuention of mans braine wherof there is no commandement or example extant in the whole Scripture Yea verily the will of God is that manie priuate sins vnto which we alone are priuy should bee concealed not vttered euen as God doth couer the multitude of our priuate sinnes of his free will and mercie wherewith he embraceth vs in Christ Iesus Notwithstanding this he requireth of vs that we priuately repent of them so oft as we shall remember them To conclude concerning Satisfaction we vtterly condemne and renounce it for by it as they teach we satisfie of ourselues the wrath and iustice of God and that by temporall punishments which we willingly suffer for our sinnes This we do vtterly condemne as an opinion which doth derogate from the merit and satisfaction of Christ whereby alone the wrath and iustice of God is satisfied for our sinnes And as for these temporall afflictions of the godly they are not truly satisfactions for their sinnes but by them God doth mortifie the remnants of sinnes and by that meanes prouoke vs to earnest repentance hereby curbing and keeping vs from falling into sinne againe Finally as all things worke for the best to them that loue God so these things which are not so much punishments as crosses do worke together for the best for the godly Neither is
Christ which notwithstāding hold I know not what freedom of will that our meritorious works do cōcurre in our votion iustification glorification with the grace of God For as touching our calling although they confesse this to be true that preuenting grace as they speak doth so preuent or preoccupy vs euen then when we thinke nothing of the grace of God or of preparing our selues to receiue grace but being as it were a sleep in sin yet they do ascribe to free-wil that affiance which we giue vnto faith wherby we assent vnto preuenting grace admit y e same as though we had any actual free-wil or self power as they speak to receiue the grace of God We do grant some power or freedome of wil wherby it inclines after a sort vnto that which is is good I vnderstand a power of the matter but wee do vtterly deny that men by nature haue any actual free-will or that we haue a selfe power to do that which is good as it is good That selfe or neere power of will or liberty of will to good I define to be that liberty in the will which is by the essentiall forme of Potentia propinqua holinesse or by the image of God which is imprinted in the will as may appeare in the Chap. of free-will before handled Therefore wee hold and teach that in receiuing the first grace our will stands before God meere passiuely and not actiuely that is when the free grace of God preuenteth it we say it hath a power vnto good but the same to be of the matter only as schoolemen speak passiue which they call a remote power Againe we auouch that the same power is made actual by meanes of diuine grace preuenting vs y t is by the working of the holy spirit who taketh possession as it were of vs by the preaching of the Gospell whereby the holy Ghost doth renue our hearts inspiring that life of God into vs frō which we were before altogether strangers as it is writtē Eph. 4. 17. 18. 19. creating in vs againe that image of God which was lost that image I say of holinesse true righteousnesse As touching our iustification where our aduersaries do affirme that it is two fold terming y e 1. habituall the 2. Popish iustification actuall they say that we are prepared by our free-will to the 1. iustification as by a principal agent by the grace working together with the same But as for the 2. iustification that they place in works proceeding from free wil from our first iustificatiō which they cal infused grace And here they ascribe life euerlasting to the merit of this 2. iustification which dooth consist in the workes of our free-will and of infused grace as they call it Hence we may see that they do not attribute to the only grace of God any of the former benefits neither iustificatiō nor vocatiō nor glorificatiō nor any of those spiritual graces which God in time giues to his children But they do part them betweene Gods grace free-will and mans merit Finally if any comparison be made between God vs concerning the conferring of these benefits we shall Note find them to ascribe more to vs and our free-will our works then to the grace of God But we haue written somewhat of this before in the chapters of our effectuall calling of repentance of free-wil Therefore I refer the reader to these places and here I end this matter Thus far then haue we spoken of this common place of our effectuall calling which because it comprehendeth vnder it many other points of diuinity it may be wel reckoned amongst the most generall heads of Theologie OF THE MEANES WHEREby God from the beginning hath reuealed both his couenants vnto Mankind Question HOW many waies are there whereby God from the beginning hath reuealed all his will that is Kinds or forms of reuelation the doctrine of both couenants of works grace vnto mankind A. They are two Q. Which be they A. The first is a liuely voice the second is the Scripture Q. What callest thou a liuely voice A. The first meanes of reuelation whereby God partly by his owne mouth and partly by men hath manifested VVhat is meant by a liuely voice the whole doctrine of both couenants to his church from time to time Q. What were the instruments of that liuely voice from the beginning A. First God himselfe spake sometimes by his Sonne in VVhose it was the forme or likenes of man appearing to the Fathers sometimes by his spirit inwardly in the heart Secondly the liuely voice of Angels was heard Thirdly the liuely voice of men first of the Fathers then of Moses and the Prophets after that of Iohn the Baptist vntil Christ Then lowed Christ himselfe manifested in the flesh Last of all the liuely voice of the Apostles of Christ Q. This kind of reuelation which was by a liuely voice of al The quality of it these whom you haue named was it by inspiration and altogether free from error A. Concerning the liuely voice of God himselfe of Christ and of the Angels there is no question and as concerning men whose liuely voice God hath vsed from the beginning of the world hitherto in reuealing his wil to his Church they truly albeit they were sinfull men and in part onely regenerate notwithstanding in the deliuery of the doctrine of the truth of both couenants they were so extraordinarily gouerned and inspired with the Holy Spirit of God that they could by no meanes erre Q. Doest thou meane then that all men as manie as haue beene from the beginning of the world hitherto by whose mouth God hath-spoken to his Church were men extraordinary endued with extraordinary gifts of the holy Ghost confirmed by miracles A. I meane euen so for prophecy in times past came not by the will of man but holy men spake as they were moued by the spirit of God 2. Pet. 1. 2. Q. At what time began this liuely voice in the Church VVhen it began A. It began euen in the first creation of man Q. How long hath the liuely voice of God and men who could not erre in deliuering the doctrine of the truth continued Continuance of it in the Church of God A. It hath been from the beginning of the world euen to the death of the Apostles all which time there was almost no age wherein at least some one holy man of God was not extraordinarily stirred vp who could not erre in deliuering the doctrine of the truth Q. Why doe you say almost was there anie intermission at all A. Truly there was but I will name onely some more notable intermissions which may be gathered out of the holy scriptures First in the age of the Patriarches it is obserued that there was an intermission in Terachs time who was the Father of Abraham for albeit he retained some grounds of