them into Christ that which inables men to take and to receiue Christ Iesus now it is not baptisme but faith only which doth this it is faith only that ingrafts men into Christ and makes them the sonnes of God Gal. 3. 26. Iohn 1. 12. it is faith only that brings Christ Iesus into mens soules Gal. 2. 20. Ephes. 3. 17. it is the hand of faith only that takes Christ Iesus that applies him and puts him on in Iesus Christ neither circumcision a◅aileth any thing nor vncircumcision but faith which worketh by loue Gal. 5. 6. And therefore take this place of Paul how you will it proues not that all those that are baptized are truly regenerated If any other places of Scripture are obiected to the contrary the former answers will fully satisfie them Thirdly I say that this is not the doctrine of the Church of England and those words which Mr. Mountague hath cited out of the Common-prayer Booke doe not proue it For that which is saide of infants which are to bee baptized in our Common-prayer Booke in the forme of baptisme doubt not therefore but earnestly beleeue that Christ will imbrace them with the armes of his mercy that hee will giue them the blessing of eternall life and make them partakers of his euerlasting kingdome if you take it in the right sense it is no more in effect then this That it is Christs will and pleasure that infants should be baptized and that hee hath'a fauour and respect vnto them but that all infants that are baptized are in truth regenerated that it proues not Mr. Mountague indeed as if hee were not acquainted with the Liturgie and publike religious seruise of our Church vnlesse it were to correct it and to cauell at it for which hee taxeth and condemneth others who are lesse guilty then himselfe would haue the word in the preterperfect tence citing this word hath for wilt because he would wrest the words to his purpose but the words are in the future tense and are no more in effect then that which I haue said before Indeede the wordes after baptisme are in the preterperfect tence We yeeld thee hearty thankes most mercifull Father that it hath pleased thee to regenerate this infant with thy holy Spirit to receiue him for thine owne childe by adoption and to incorporate him into thy holy congregation Which words proue not that all infants which are baptized are by their very baptisme truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ because these words and so the others before baptisme are not generall and vniuersall but they are limited and restrained to one particular infant or those particular infants which are then to be baptized whose absolute and definitiue estate is only knowne to God and not vnto the Church Our Church out of charity because shee knoweth nothing to the contrary doth beleeue that euery particular infant that is baptized is regenerated that is sacramentally or because you will haue it so Mr. Mountague really and spiritually yet shee beleeueth not that all infants that are baptized are spiritually and truly regenerated by their baptisme and ingrafted into Christ that Mr. Mountague as well read as hee is in the Common-prayer Booke cannot shew mee If you now object that that which is true of euery indiuiduall is true of the whole species and therfore i◅ our Church beleeue that euery particular infant that is baptized is regenerated therefore that shee is of opinion that all are so I answer that the rule is false for there are many things which may bee saide and predicated truly or at least charitablie of Indiuidualls which are false of the whole species and cannot bee applied to it A man may say hee ought to say of euery particular and euery indiuiduall man in the world that hee may beleeue hee may repent and he may bee saued because hee hath no warrant to the contrary and hee cannot know whether God hath otherwise disposed of him yet a man cannot say that all men shall be saued that all men may beleeue and repent because it is contrary to the reuealed will and word of God So a man may and ought to say of euery particular infant which is baptized that hee is regenerated because he knowes not any thing to the contrary Indeede afterwards if hee see him liue a wicked and vngodly life he may then safely say that hee was not regenerated by his baptisme because his life and workes declare as much but yet no man can safely say that all that are baptized are spiritually really and effect ually regenerated because it is not so reuealed in the Scriptures This charitable opiniō then of the Church of England being restrained to indiuiduall particular infants and not extended and inlarged to all such as are baptized warrants not Mr. Mountagues collection from it That all infants which are baptized are truly spiritually and effectually regenerated Which answers likewise the words in the Catechisme for there the childe in the second answer answeres only for himselfe that by his baptisme not all that were baptized but I was made a member of Christ a childe of God and an inheritor of the kingdome of heauen that is I haue a right and title to all those by my baptisme if I will lay hold on them and take possession of them by faith my baptisme giues me a title to them but doth not giue mee actuall and full possession of them For these words in the Rubricke before the Catechisme That children being baptized haue all things necessary for their saluation the meaning is no more but this That ba◅tisme without faith knowledge lou◅ and actuall repentance is sufficient for to saue such children as dye before yeares of discretion because God will not require impossibilities at their hands and such conditions which they were not able to performe Or else that children by their baptisme are admitted into the Church and haue an interest in all those priuiledges and means of grace which are necessary to saluation what is this to purpose that all infants that are baptized are spiritually and truly regenerated Yea but the Rubricke saith that if they dye before actuall sinne they shall bee vndoubtedly saued That is such infants as are baptized and dye before actuall sin are saued because our Church knowes nothing to the contrary shee knowes not whether God hath otherwise disposed of them But yet it is not there recorded that all infants that are baptized are regenerated and saued or that such infants which fall away from the sacramentall grace which they receiued should haue beene saued if they had died before actuall sinne Wherefore in any wise mans judgement that hath his wits and senses about him there is nothing in the Booke of Common-prayers to warrant this assertion That all such a◅ are baptized are truly and spiritually regenerated it is only Mr. Mountagues false and brainsicke conceite who torments and rackes our Common prayer Booke to defend his Error
translated and taken out of the world being made men of another world those who are translated from death to life and shall not come into condemnation it is impossible for them either totally or finally to fall from grace But all those who are once tâ—…uly râ—…generated and ingrafted into Christ they haue ouercome the world 1 Ioh. 4. 4. Yee are of God little children and haue ouercome them because greater is hee that is in you then hee that is in the world cap. 5. 4 5. Whosoeuer is borne of God ouercommeth the world and this is the victory that ouercommeth the world euen our faith Christ hath ouercome the world for them Io. 16. 33. And God hee giueth them victory through the Lord Iesus Christ 1 Cor. 15. 57. They are quite translated and taken out of the World They are redeemed from the earth and from this present euill world and made men of another world their hearts and soules their thoughts their affections desires and conuersationâ—… are in heaueâ—… Io. 15 19. cap. 17. 11. 16. Reu 14. 3. 4. Phil. 3. 20. They are translated from death to life and shall not come into condemnation Io. 5. 24. Verily verily I say vnto you hee that heareth my word aâ—…d belâ—…eueth on him that sent me hath euerlasting life and shall not come into condemnation but is past from death vnto life Rom. 8. 1. There is no condemnation to those that are in Christ Iesus who walke not after the flesh but after the spirit Col. 1. 13. who hath deliuered vs from the power of darknesse and hath translated vs into the Kingdome of his deare Soâ—…ne and 1 Io. 3. 14. Wee know that wee haue passed from death vnto life because wee loue the brethren Therefore it is impossible for them either finally or totally to fall from grace Sixtly those who are partakers of the first resurrection those who are dead to sinne those who haue put off the old man called vs with an holy calling Tit. 3. 5. According to his mercy hee saued vs by the washing of regeneration and renewing of the holy Ghost Yea they are saued to the vttermost Heb. 7. 25. they are saued in the Lord with an euerlasting saluation they shall not bee ashamed nor confounded world without end Isai. 45. 17. they are passed from death to life and shall not come into condemnation Iohn 5. 24 And they haue euerlasting life in present possession hee that beleeueth on me he that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hâ—…h euerlasting life Christ doth not say he shall haue it but hee hath euerlasting life Iohn 3. 16. 18. 36. ca. 5. 24. c. 6. 27. 39 49 47 50 51 54 57 58. Christ hath giuen euerlasting life to all those that are his sheepe Iohn 10. 28. Euery true beleeuer hee hath the Sonne of God dwelling in him and therefore he cannot choose but haue euerlasting life Hee that hath the Son hath euerlasting life within him 1 Iohn 5. 11 12 13. Yea this is life eternall to know God to bee the only true God and Iesus Christ whom he hath sent Iohn 17. 3. and 1 Iohn 5. 13. 20. Therefore it is impossible for them to fall finally or totally from grace This is an argument which in my iudgement cannot be answered or euaded Ninthly all those who are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ are called iustified and sanctified they are made the members of Iesus Christ and they are made Kings and Priests for euer vnto God the Father which yeelds vnto vs this ninth argument Those that are once truly called iustified and sanctified those that are once become the true and liuing members of Iesus Christ and are made Kings and Priests for euer vnto God the Father it is impossible for them to fall finally or totally from grace For first those that are called effectually by God they are called to saluation and to the obtaining of the glory of the Lord Iesus Christ 2 Thes. 2. 13 14. They are called vnto Gods kingdome and glory 1 Thes. 2. 12. They are called to lay hold of eternall life 1 Tim. 6. 12. therefore they cannot fall from grace for then they should loose the end of their calling Secondly all those that are iustified they are freed from condemnation and they are iustified only to this end and purpose thâ—…t they might not bee condemned Rom. 8. 1. 33. 34. and Iohn 5. 24. Therefore they cannot fall from grace for then they should loose the benefit and fruite of their iustification Thirdly all those who are sanctified they are therefore sanctified that they might bee glorified and saued Rom. 8. 30. 2 Thes. 2. 13. Tit. 3. 5. 1 Pet. 1. 3 4 5. Fourthly all such as are the true and liuing members of Iesus Christ Christ giâ—…es vnto them eternall life Iohn 10. 28. and 1 Ioh. 5. 11 12 13. Though they were dead before yet they shall liue in him and when they doe liue once in him they shall so liue that they shall neuer die death shall haue no more dominion and power ouer them John 11. 25 26. and Rom. 6. 9 10 11. Christ Iesus who is the head will neuer suffer any of his liuing true and faithfull members for to perish he will keepe them and preserue them so that none of them shall be euer lost or broken or cut off from him Psal. 34. 20. and Iohn 17. 12. Where Christ himselfe is there they shall alwayes be they in him and hee in them Iohn 17. 23 24. Fiftly all such as are Kings and Priests vnto God for euer they cannot fall finally nor totally from grace for then they should cease to be Kings and Priests and could not be such for euer But all those who are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ they are truly called iustified and sanctified Rom. 8. 29 30 1 Cor. 6. 11. Ephes. 1. 18. cap. 5. 26. 27 2 Thess. 2. 13. Christ Iesus is made vnto them of God righteousnesse iustification sanctification and redemption 1 Cor 1. 30. They are the true and liuing members of Iesus Christ Ephes. 5. 30. Wee are members of his body of his flesh and of his bone Christ is the Vine they are the branches Iohn 15. 5. Hee is the head and body they are the members 1 Cor. 6. 15. Ephes. 4 16. and Col. 2. 19. And they are made Kings and Priests for euer vnto God the Father to offer vp spirituall sacrifices vnto â—…im 1 Pet. 2. 5. Reu. 15. 6. and cap. 5. 10. Therefore it is impossible for them to fall finally or totally from grace Tenthly the true regenerate Saints of God they haue their names written in heauen and in the Booke of liâ—…e which doth suggest vnto vs this tenth Argument They whose names are written in heauen and ingrauen in the Booke of life it is impossible for them to fall quite away from grace First because that God himselfe hath promised that hee will neuer blot out the names of those who are
the words are that he may fall into sinne not that he doth cast himselfe into sinne in a voluntary presumptuous and wilfull manner so that this word fall into sinne implies that these sinnes here mentioned are sinnes of infirmity and incogitancie not of malice and presumption now I hope you will grant that sinnes of infirmitie and incogitancie without any precogitated and resolued malice doe not cast a man totally from the state of â—…ce for then euery Saint of God should fall from the state of grace continually but only sinnes of malice and presumption committed with an high hand and with an absolute full and deliberate consent Wherefore the sinne mentioned in the Article being but a sinne of infirmitie only and not of praecogitated and resolued malice it cannot be imagined that this falling into sinne in the Article should bee a totall or a finall fall from grace Thirdly obserue the order of the words they doe first depart from grace giuen and then fall into sinne they doe not fall into sinne first and then depart from grace giuen if then they depart from grace before they fall into sinne then this departure from grace cannot be intended of a falling from the state of grace because our Antagonists will confesse that the sinne committed is that which casts men downe from the state of grace and that men fall not from grace before but after sinne committed this departure therefore from grace giuen being before the sinne committed cannot be a totall departure from the habit and state but from the act of grace Fourthly the very coherence and connexion of the words will cleere the sense and meaning of them For and being a conjunction copulatiâ—…e â—…itting both sentences together it makes the sense of the Article After wee haue receiued the holy Ghost 〈◊〉 may depart from grace giuen and full into sinne to bee no more but this after wee haue receiued the holy Ghost wee may â—…all into sinne so that 〈◊〉 departure from grace giuen is nothing else but to fall into sinne which a man may doe and yet not fall from grace so that torture and rackâ—… these words which way you will they will not warrant this doctrine of a totall or a finall fall from grace Yâ—…a but you will object that these subsequent words By the grace of God wee 〈◊〉 rise againe and amend our liues doe necessarily imply thus much that the Saints of God may fall totally and finally from grace True Mr. Mountague if you if Bortius or the Rhemists bee the interpreters else there might be some doubt of it For you must know that the only reason wherefore these words were added to the former was but to meete with the Montanists Nâ—…uations Anabaptists and Brownists who denied forgiuenesse and reconciliation to such as sinned after Baptisme and if you had not beene purblinde when as you reade the Article you could not but haue seene it But God in his justice hath giuen you eyes according to your minde which alwaies looke besides and ouerthwart the truth but not vpon it But if you will haue the sense of these words it is only this that the Saints of God may rise againe from that sinne into which they were fallen and amend their liues not that they rise againe from the state of condemnation That from which the Saints of God must rise is only from that into which they were fallen for falling and rising they are Relatiues but the thing into which the Saints were fallen was but into some act of sinne as appeares by the words of the Article wee may depart from grace and fall into sinne it was not a fall from the state of grace into the state of damnation and therefore this is but a rising from some actuall sinne to amendment of life Secondly I say that these words make much against you For if those that fall doe rise againe this doth necessarily imply that they were not fallen quite away from the state of grace into the death of sinne that all their spirituall life was not extinguished and abolished by their fall for if they were dead in trespasses and sinnes they could not rise againe Hee that is quite dead in sinne and without the life of grace is not said to rise againe and amend his life for that implies a continuance of the former life but hee is said to reuiue againe and to haue a new life put into him and therefore if the Article had intended this departure from grace giuen and falling into sinne of a totall or finall fall from grace into the state of death and damnation the words should haue beene these Hee may reuiue againe or God may raise him vp to a new estate of grace againe and hee may haue a new life of grace infused into him which would crosse this rule in Logicke à priuatione ad habitum non datur regressus and not that he may rise againe and amend his life Take then either the title or the scope and substance or the very letter and words of the 16. Article yet neither of them will warrant this doctrine of a totall or a finall fall from grace All the argument which any man can raise from this Article in proofe of this conclusion is but from the bare words and letter abâ—…racted from the sense to wit Those who haue receiued the holy Ghost may depart from grace giuen and fall into sinne and by the grace of God may rise againt and amend their liues Therefore the true regenerate Saints of God may both finally and totally fall from grace therefore faith once â—…ad may be both totally and finally lost which how wâ—…ll it followes let all men judge But to giue M. Mountague and others full satisfaction in the sense and meaning of this Article I will compare it with some other Articles which are expresse in point that the true regenerate Saiâ—…ts of God â—…an neither finally nor totally fall from grace The 5. Article of Lambeth concluded and agreed vpon Nouemb. 20. 1595. by diuers reuerend and learned Bishops and Diuines of this our Church for the determining of some controuersies in the Vniuersitie of Cambridge is expressely contrarie to Mr. Mountagues collection from our 16 Article for the words of that Article are these True liuing iustifying faith and the sanctifying Spirit of God is not extinguished it fayles not it vanisheth not away in the Elect either finally or totally If the 16. Article had beene expresse to the contrary I suppose the reuerend and learned Composers of this Article would not haue varied from it But Mr. Mountague pleads to this that the Articles of Lambeth are forbidden by Authority but when and where and by what authority that he sets not downe Surely for my owne part I neuer yet could learne that these Articles were disallowed by any publike authoritie but only by Mr. Mountagues who like a Magisteriall Dictator and Cathedrall moderator ouer all divinitie and Diuines approues
workes in as much as there are many godly practicall wholesome and necessary doctrines helping men to honour and worship almighty God which are not the receiued established and confirmed doctrines of our Church Fifthly in these words Mr. Mountague if you marke the end wherefore he speakes them to wit because they are to sharpe and to precise against Images affirmes that the Church of England doth gratifie the Church of Rome in points of Poperie indeauouring tò reconcile herselfe and to submit to her in things in which she hath formerly oppugned her These fiue things are necessarily implied and I feare me principally intended in these words and passage of Mr. Mountague touching our Homilies and their authoritie amongst vs what censure hee is worthy of for such words and passages as these I leaue to others I judge him not From the authoritie of our Homilies and Mr. Mountagues abusing of them I come to examine the words which hee obiected out of them against my present assertion His first obiection is from the title of the Homilie There is an Homilie saith he allowed and established in our Church intituled Of falling he addes away from God Therefore it is the receiued and established doctrine of the Church of England that true regenerate men may both totally and finally fall from grace Was there euer such a ridiculous and simple argument propounded by any learned man that had his wits and sences about him as if the doctrine of the Church of England were meerely titular depending on the very titles of bookes which as they are not alwaies sutable to the doctrine contained in them so are they neuer doctrinall positiue resolutions in themselues therefore Mr. Mountague if you had not a brazen forhead or a crazie braine you could not chuse but blush at this your agument From the title of the homilies I descend vnto the words the which you cite The words out of the first Homilie are these For where as God hath sâ—…ewed to all them that truly beleiue his Gospell his face of mercy in Christ Iesus which doth so inlighten their hearts that they if they behold it as they ought to doe which parenthesis you haue omitted be transformed to his image be partakers of the heauenly light and of his holy Spirit and be fashioned to him in all goodnesse requisite to the children of God so if they after doe neglect the same if they be vnthankefull vnto him if they order not their liues according to his example and Doctrine and to the setting forth of his glory he will take away from them his kingdome his holy word wherby he should reigne in them because they bring not forth the fruite thereof that he toâ—…kes for The words you cite out of the second Homilie are these The place of Esay 〈◊〉 before sheweth that God at length will so forsake his vnfruitfull 〈◊〉 that he will not only suffer it to bring forth wilde bryers thâ—…rnes but also further to punish the vnfruitefullnesse of it Hee saith hee will not cut it he will not delue it and he will command the cloudes that they shall not raine vpon it meaning that hee will take away the teaching of his holy word from them which words Master Mountague hath passed ouer so that they shall be no longer of his kingdome they shall bee no longer gouerned by his holy Spirit they shall be put from the grace and benefits which they had and ouer might haue iniâ—…yed through Christ they shall be depriued of the heauenly life and light which they had in Christ whiles they abode in him And to be shart they shall bee giuen into the power of the 〈◊〉 which 〈◊〉 rule in all them that he cast away from God as he did in Saul and Iudâ—…s and generally in all such as worke after their owne wills the children of mistrust and vnbeleife You say Master Mountagne that these two Homilies but principally the words here cited doe thoroughly and wholly insist vpon the affirmation that faith once had may againe be lost and that no other construction of these words may be made then that a man my fall and hapâ—…e from grace both totally and finally But I pray what faith and what grace doe you intend Mr. Mountague a true liuing and justifying faith and sanctifying sauing and habituall grace or onely an historicall and common faith or ordinary common and hypocriticall grace If you intend these latter for you leaue them indefinite and ambigious that so you may euade the better when you are questioned for abusing our Church and Homilies then I say that your inference and collection is nothing to the purpose and reacheth not vnto thâ—…t faith and grace which is now in question If you intend and meane the former I answere then that these words of the Homilie doe not warrant yours For first they are your owne words That words are not direct which are not expresse Now here there is not so much as one word that faith once had may be lost that a true regenerate man may fall finally and totally from the state of grace your eyes Mr. Mountagne are better then all other mens if you can finde these words or any like vnto them in these Homilies they are but your priuate fancie conceite and therefore this is not the direct positiue and declatorie doctrine of these Homilies but your false and forged collection from them Secondly that I may instruct you a little in the Homilies in which I feare me you are truly or wilfully ignorant you may please to obserue Mr. Mountague that in the second and third part of the Homilie of faith It is said expresly That hee that beleeueth in Christ hath euerlasting life and therefore it must needs consequently follow that he that hath this faith must also haue good workes and be studious to obserue Gods Commandements obediently so that neither the world the diuill 〈◊〉 all the power of them shall preuaile against him That they that haue a liuely faith doe make their calling and election certaine sure and stable by good workes Therefore it is the expresse doctrine of the Homilies that true faith once had cannot be vtterly lost againe these words then which you alledge cannot imply the contrary vnlesse you will haue them to repeale and contradict the former Thirdly Mr. Mountague these two Homilies and the words you cite out of them doe not thoroughly and wholly insist vpon this that faith once had may be lost againe but if it please you to reade them ouer once againe you shall see that their principall and onely end is to exhort men to obey the Gospell and the word of God and to bring forth fruits worthy of them for feare least God depriue them of them What then will you inferre from hence All men are exhorted to obey Gods word for feare of being depriued of it Therefore the true beleiuers and Saints of God may fall totally and finally from grace
against the Doctrine of the totall and 〈◊〉 perseuerauce of the Saints in grace which hath beene so long setled and established in our Church reflect and cast your eyes on these examples which are such liuely Emblems and representations of your selues These Libertines Iewes and Gentiles when as they could finde nothing to reply against that truth the which they did oppose they leaue the matter and the points in question and fly vpon the persons of such as did defend them So you since you haue nothing to reply vnto the arâ—… of those who do defend the totall final perseuerance of the Saints in grace doe waiue the Controuersie and fall foule vpon their persons thinking to carry away the cause by calumnies and scandalous accusations because you cannot do it by force and truth of argument For first you accuse and taxe all such who patronize this orthodox and ancient truth for Puritans Secondly for pestilent seditious and factious persons And thirdly for such as doe contrary to the decrees of Caesar such as violate and transgresse his Maiesties most pious Proclamation and vpon these false and scandalous grounds you labour to suppresse the workes and prosecute the persons of all such as doe defend this truth A worthy and a learned confutation which sauoreth of nothing but of pure malice and venomous rancor against all grace goodnesse and such as doe defend them Now that all the world may know how false your accusations are and so how ill your cause I will a little 〈◊〉 them and discusse them Your first accusation and objection against our present assertion is this That there are none but Puritants who 〈◊〉 it Surely if you so confidently affirme that there are none but 〈◊〉 that defend it I may with greater confidence and truth 〈◊〉 it that there are none but Pelagians Papists and Arminians nay 〈◊〉 who oppose it if any of you thinke I speake to harsh in this I haue the warrant of our late and learned Soueraigne King Iames to justifie mee who hath stiled them Heretickes and Atheisticall Sectaries vpon record But are there none but Puritans who defend it Sure I am and I hope I haue sufficiently proued it that Christ himselfe his Prophets and Apostles that all the ancient Fathers and some Councells that-all Protestant Churches and sound orthodox writers in forraine parts that the Synod of 〈◊〉 at which there were the choice Diuines of most Protestant reformed Churches that the Church of England and all her chiefest worthies and that King lames of blessed memorie haue from time to time deliuered published defended propagated and resolued this our present assertion as sound and orthodox and yet are there none but Puritans or are they all Puritans who defend it Was Christ his Prophets Apostels Puritans were all the Fathers and the Primitiue Church Puritans are all the Protestant and reformed Churches beyond the seas and all their sound and orthodox writers Puritans was thè famous Synod of Dort but a meere packe of Puritans are the Church of England and all her chiefest worthies Puritans or was King lames a Puritan that none but Puritans should maintaine this truth If you will condemne all these for Puritans as you must doe if your accusation goe for currant truth and so make Puritans to be nothing else as they are in truth but the true Church and Saints of God who professe propagate and maintaine the truth and puritie of the Gospell and will not bee withdrawne or seduced from it then we willingly acknowledge the accusation to be true and account it not a blemish but a grace and honour to our cause but if you will haue none of these to be the Puritans which you accuse your accusation then That none but Puritans defend this assertion must needes be false vnlesse you know to make a difference between those who 〈◊〉 maintained it in former times such as doe defend it now Now that I may giue a further answer vnto this false scandalous and malitious accusation I will a little inquire what kinde of creature this Puritan should be which makes such a stirre and businesse in the world and is so much accused condemned hated persecuted inueighed at and spoken against that so the odiousnesse and 〈◊〉 of the very name may not impeach the worth the credit the qualitie or condition of the person on whom it is 〈◊〉 Certainely the onely Puritan that is now aymed at and so commonly accused and spoken against is nothing else in veritie and truth if you will but lay aside the name that so you may behold him as he is But a godly and syncere Christian who stickes close vnto the word of God both in his iudgement and his practise being more abstemious from all kinde of sinue more diligent and frequent in all holy duties and more industrious to serue and please the Lord in all things then those who doe condemne reproach and censure him Hee that now sticks fast and close vnto the word of truth and will not be withdrawne from it hee that shewes forth the power and efficacy of grace in the constant holinesse of his life hee that is diligent and frequent in Gods seruice and squares his life and actions according to his word hee that makes a conscience of all his waies and workes and will not be so vitious and licentious so riotous and deboist so prophane dissolute and desperately wicked as other men hee and hee onely is the Puritan which is now so much condemned hee onely is the Puritan who now is made the very But and obiect of all mens hatred malice enuy scorne and disdaine hee onely is the Puritan whom you doe here accuse Take but away the vgly horrid and mishapen name and visard of a Puritan which doth now wholly ouercloud the persons on whom it is imposed and present them in a strange and different forme from what they are in truth and consider but the persons the liues the graces and the inside of those men who are reputed sor the greatest Puritans disrobed and vncased of the name it selfe and then the greatest and fierceest Ante-puritan of you all if his conscience be not strangly cauterized must bee forced to confesse that as it was with the Christians among the Gentiles so now it is with Puritans among such as seeme to be Christians Non scelus aliquod in causa est sed nomen et solius nominis crimen est that Puritans are hated contemned reproached accused and condemned not for any offence for any euill or wickednesse that is in them but onely for their name which is imposed on them onely for this end that men might the more freely persecute oppose dispise condemne and hate them for their holy liues And if that this seeme strange vnto you that men should be condemned hated reproached persecuted and accused for their graces and their holy liues consider then that euen from the beginning and from that time that God put
immutable and if they were not so it were not in the power of regenerate men to make them so but it hath onely reference to regenerate men themselues or to election and vocation as they haue reference to regenerate men and not to God so that the Apostles meaning is no more but this that the Saints of God ought by their holy liues and godly conuersation and by the inward graces of his holy Spirit which are the vndoubted fruits and markes of their true election vocation to assure their hearts and consciences that they were truly called and elected to saluation so that the Maior proposition remaines as true The Minor onely rests for to be proued That all those who are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ by a true and liuely faith are praedestinated and ordained vnto eternall life And this appeares by these insuing reasons First because that none are called and truly regenerated but those that are praedestinated and elected vnto eternall life which appeares by diuers euident texts of Scripture as Rom 8 30. Whom he did praedestinate them also he called a and no oothers and whom he calles them he also iustified and no others whom he iustified them he also glorified and no others God doth regenerate call sanctifie none but such as are elected to eternall life and the rest are hardned Rom 11 7. God doth saue or call none with an holy calling but according to his purpose of grace in Iesus Christ before the world began 2 Tim 1. 9. None but such as are Christs sheepe beleeue and heare his voyce Iohn 10 26. as many as are ordained to eternall life beleeue and none but they Acts 13 48. None be rich in faith but such as God hath chosen to eternall life Iames 2 5 and therefore Titus 1 1 faith is stiled the faith of Gods elect to signifie thus much vnto vs that none haue true and sauing faith but such as are elected to saluation therefore it is euident that all those who are once truly regenerated ingraâ—…ted into Christ by a true and liuely faith are praedestinated and ordinated to eternall life Secondly it must needes be so because all those that are once truly regenerated and sanctified are regenerated and sanctified by vertue of their praedestination this is euident by Ephes 1 4 5. Blessed bee God who hath chosen vs in Christ before the foundation of the world that we should be holy and without blame before him in loue hauing praedestinated vs vnto the adoption of children by Iesus Christ to himselfe Those that are sanctified called and adopted they are all praedestinated to this their adoption sanctification and calling and withall they are praedestinated to eternall life as you may reade at large Rom 8 29 30. Ephes 2 10. 1 Thes 5 9. 2 Thes 2 13 14. 1 Tim 6 12. 2 Tim 1 9 cap 2 19 21 and 1 Pet 1 2. therefore it is altogether impossible that they should euer finally fall from grace All that can be answered to this obiection and argument is onely this that there is no such absolute and irreuocable decree and praedestination to eternall life which how false it is let these Scriptures testifie Psal 139 16. Isay 49 1 5. Ier 1 5 cap 31 3. Mal 1 2 3. Math 24 22 24. cap 25 34 41. Iohn 12 40. Acts 13 48. Rom 8 29 30 33. cap 9 11 23. cap 11 5 7 28. Gal 1 15. Ephes 1 3 4 5. cap 2 10. 1 Thes 5 9 2 Thes 2 13 14. 1 Tim 6 12. 2 Tim 1 9. cap 2 19. 21. Tâ—…t 1 1. 1 Pet 1 2. cap 2 9. and 2 Pet 1 10. which are all expresse to the contrary or else that all those that are once truly regenerated sanctified and ingrafted into Christ by a liuely faith are not praedestinated to eternall life which I haue proued to be false Wherefore this argument proues this to be an vndeniable truth that those that are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Iesus Christ by a true and liuely faith can neuer finally fall from grace for then Gods election should be frustrated which cannot be The second thing in God is his almightie power and strength which giues vs full assurance that those who are once truly regenerated can neither finally nor totally fall from grace from which I frame this second argument Those who are kept by the very might and power of God vnto saluation it is altogether impossible for them either finally or totally to fall from grace But all such as are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ by a true liuely faith they are kept by the very might and power of God vnto saluation so is the expresse text in the 1 Pet 1 5. Who are kept by the power of God through faith vnto saluation so is Esay 26 3 c 27 3. I the Lord do keepe my vynyard I will water it euery moment least any hurt it I will keepe it night and day thou wilt keepe him in perfect peace whose minde is staied on thee so is Iohn 10 27 28 29. My sheepe heare my voyce and I giue vnto them eternall life and they shall neuer perish neither shall any man plucke them out of my hands my Father that gaue them me is greater then all and no man is able to plucke them out of my Fathers hand God doth keep all those that are once truly regenerated through his owne name vnto euerlasting life he preserues and keepes them by his power Iohn 17 11. 2 Cor 12 9. cap 13 4. Ephes 1. 18. and 2 Tim 1 12 wherefore they can neither finally nor totally fall from grace All that is replyed to this argument is onely this That it is true that God doth keepe all such as are regenerated by his power to saluation he preserues them so that nothing can plucke them out of his hands vnlesse they will themselues God doth preserue and keepe them so that no outward thing shâ—…l plucke them from him but yet he doth not preserue them from themselues though nothing can plucke them out of his hands yet they by the liberty of their owne wills may plucke themselues out of his hands and so fall totally or finally from grace To which I answer that it is as impossible for the Saints themselues by vertue of their owne free will to pull themselues out of the hands of God as it is for any outward thing to doe it First because Christ himselfe tells vs that no man can pluck them out of his Father hands if no man can do it then they themselues can neuer doe it for they are but men and so are included in this word no man as well as others no man nor any man can doe it therefore they themselues can neuer doe it Secondly they themselues can neuer doe it because the Scripture saith expresly that they are kept by the power of God through faith vnto saluation that they are kept night and
that hee can suffer any of his deare adopted and best beloued sons in Christ to fall and perish for want of supportation and defence that he who hath redeemed them by the rich and pretious blood of Iesus Christ his onely Senne when as they were his mortall and his vtter enemies will not preseruâ—… and keepe them from falling from him now they are his dearest deare as deare vnto them as the very apple of his eye Deut. 32. 10. Zech. 2. 8 certainly that gratious God of infinite and boundlesse mercy who will not suffer so much as one â—…aire of the heads of any of his Saints to perish Luke 21. 16. will not nor cannot out of the riches of his great and glorious mercy suffer the least and meanest of his true and faithfull Saints who are his only and his cheifest iewels for to perish nor yet finally nor totally to fall from him let all the rabble of Papists Arminians and the rest of our Antagonists say what they can or will to the contrary The sixth thing in God which may assure vs of the finall and totall perseuerance of the Saints is the infinite justice of God from whence I frame this sixth argument Those who are in that happy estate of grace which God in his justice will not nor can not suffer them vtterly to loose or fall from it s altogether impossible for them either finally or totally to fall from grace But all such as are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ by a true and liuely faith are in such an happy estate of grace as God in his justice will not nor cannot suffer them vtterly to loose and fall from therefore they can neither finally nor totally fall from grace The Maior can not be denyed beeause then God should be vn iust the Minor onely needes a proofe Now that all those who are truly regenerated which are once the true members of Iesus Christ are in that happy estate of grace which God in his justice will not nor can not suffer them to fall from it is most euident for Iesus Christ hath purcâ—…sed eternall redemption and saluation for the 〈◊〉 with his pretious bloud hee hath satisfied his Fathers wrath for them vnto the fill being made a curse for them that they might be made sonnes of God the heires of heauen and the righteousnesse of God through him 2 Cor 5 19. 21. Rom 7 6. cap 8 2 Col 2 14. Gal 4 5. cap 2 20. Heb 9 12. cap 10 12 14. 1 Pet 1 18 19. Christ hath payed a full satisfactory price vnto hiâ—… Father for all such as are his members hee hath purchased them of his Father hee hath purchased grace heauen happinesse saluation euerlasting life and all things that may further and preserue them in their state of grace and glory and God his Father hath accepted his price at his hands as a sufficient full and perfect satisfaction yea he hath promised to preserue them in the â—…tate of grace to keepe them from falling and perishing to giue them that inheritance which Christ hath purchased for them and to make good vnto the vtmost euery thing that Christ hath merited and procured of him for their eternall good so that God is now in his justice bound for to preserue them in the state of grace continually and to make good vnto them what euer his Son Christ Iesus hath purchased of him for them wherefore this is certaine and it cannot be denyed that all those who are once truly regenerated and made the members of Iesus Christ through faith can neither finally nor totally fall from grace because God in his justice will not nor can not suffer them to fall from their estate of grace What can be well replyed to this argument I cannot as yet sâ—…rmise If you say that though Christ hath purchased grace heauen and eternall life for all his true and faithfull members yet he hath not purchased perseuerance and the meanes for to obtaine them I answere first that this is false and quite repugnant to the Scriptures which assure vs that God in Christ hath giuen them not onely life and godlinesse but all things that appertaine vnto them too 2 Pet 1 3. that as he hath 〈◊〉 them Iesus Christ so 〈◊〉 hath together with him freely giuen them all things else Rom 8 32. God hath giuen them his word to instruct them his Sacraments to feede and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Spirit to 〈◊〉 comfort and direct them to preserue them from falling he himselfe is alwaies present with them holding them vp with his hand carrying them in his armâ—…s and helping them on in the way to heaâ—…en he that giues them grace heauen and eter nall life doth giue them perseuerance too he puts his feare into their bearts that they shall not depart from him Ier 32 40. wherefore this is but a false surmise Secondly if Christ should haue onely purchased grace heauen and â—…ternall life for them and not giuen them perseuerance with all and the meanes for to obtaine the things so purchased his death and purchase had bin in vaine for alas they of themselues are able to doe nothing without his ayde and assistance it is he that must worke all in them and for them Isai 26 12. Ieh 3 27. cap 6 44 65. Rom 2 29. Gal 2 20. Phil 2 13. 1 Cor 3 7. cap. 4. 7. cap 15 10. and 2 Cor 3 5. if Christ had not purchased the meanes for to obtaine saluation and eternall life as well as the things themselues if he had not purchased the perpetuity and perseuerance of his Saints in grace as well as grace it selfe his death had bin in vaine and to no purpose Wheâ—…efore this surâ—…ise is idle and so the argument remaines vnanswerable The seuenth argument to proue my present assertion is taken from the honour of God Those who are in such an estate of true and sauing grace as it will not stand with Gods honour and glory that euer they should loose it or fall off from it those who are in such an estate of grace as God in his honour cannot but preserue them in it it s altogether impossibile that they should euer finâ—…lly or totally fall from that estate But all those who are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ are in such an estate of true and sauing grace as it will not stand with Gods honour and glory that euer they should loose it or fall off from it they are in such an estate of grace as God in his honour can not but preserue them in it therefore it s altogether impossible that they should either finally or totally fall from this estate The Maior can not but be true because that God is alwayes so iealous of his honour and his glory that hee will by no meanes loose them when as it lyeth in his power to preserue them as we may see by those expresse 〈◊〉 and examples of holy Scripture
fiery darts of the wicked Ephes 6 11 to 19. God will loue them euen vnto the end he will loue them euen with an euerlasting loue his loue and mercy shall rest vpon them for euer he will perfect that worke of grace which he hath begun within them and he will suffer no temptation whatsoeuer vtterly to vanquish and subdue them Therefore it cannot be that they should euer finally or totally fall from grace The eight sort and kind of promises making for me are that the Lord will neuer forget his Saints that he will neuer cast them off that he will quite subdue their iniquities and rebellions that he will heale their backslidings and that hee will remember their iniquities and sinnes no more From which this eighth argument doth arise Those whom God hath promised neuer to forget neuer to cast out or off those whose iniquities and rebellions he will quite subdue those whose backslidings he will heale and those whose sinnes and iniquities he will no more remember it is impossible that they should either finally or totally fall from grace But God hath promised all such as are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ that he will neuer forget nor yet forsake them Isai. 49 15 16. Can a woman forget her sucking child that she should not haue compassion on the sonne of her wombe yea they may forget yet will not I forget thee Behold I haue grauen thee vpon the palmes of my hands thy wayes are continually before mee and as God will not forget so neither will he forsake his people 1 Sam. 12 22. the Lord will not forsake his people for his great names sake because it hath pleased the Lord to make them his people his gifts and graces they are without repentance Rom. 11. 29. whom hee hath once chosen he will not forsake Hebr. 13. 6. Yea God will quite subdue all their iniquities and rebellions and heale all their backslidings Ier. 3. 22. Hosea 14. 5. Mich. 7. 19. he will remember their sinnes and their iniquities no more Ier. 31. 34. Heb. 8. 12. and 10. 17. hee will turne againe hee will haue compassion on them hee will subdue their iniquities and cast all their sinnes into the depths of the sea Mich 7. 19. Hee hath chosen them and will not cast them away the Father hath giuen them to Christ who when they come vnto him will in no wise cast them out Iohn 6 37 therefore it is impossible for them either finally or totally to fall from grace If you obiect that though God will neuer forget neuer forsake them or cast them out yet they forget forsake and cast off God and so fall from God I answere First that God wil subdue their rebellions heal their backslidings therefore they can neuer vtterly and totally reuolt from him Secondly I answere that if God will neuer forsake them neuer forget them neuer cast them out as hee hath promised not to doe it then they can neuer forsake forget or cast off God for whiles he is with them and in them hee will not suffer them to forsake or cast him off Christ is that good sheepheard of our soules those that are his shepe hee will not onely not cast them out of his fold but he will also keepe them so that none of them shall be lost Iohn 10. 28. and 17. 12. Wherfore this cauill and obiection is but vaine and idle The ninth kind of promises making for me are these he that beleeueth he that repenteth shall be saued he shall neuer perish neuer come into condemnation he shall haue euer lasting life and shall receiue a sure reward From which I raise this argument They that shall assuredly be saued they that shall neuer perish nor come into condemnation they that shall haue euerlasting life and shall receiue a sure reward it cannot be that they should euer fall quite away from grace But God hath promised that all such as doe repent and beleiue shall assuredly be saued that they shall neuer perish nor come into condemnation that they shall haue euerlasting life and receiue a sure reward Psa 34. 22. Psal. 37 40. Isai. 45. 17 cap. 55. 3. Marke 16. 16. Luke 12 32. Iohn 3. 17 18. cap 5 24. cap. 10 28. Rom 〈◊〉 9 10 17 21. cap 8 1. cap. 10 13. 1 Tim 4 8. Heb. 11 16. 1 Iohn 3 14. and Prou 11. 18 all expresse in point Therefore it cannot be that they should euer fall quite away from grace To omit all others The tenth and last promise which makes for me is that couenant which God hath made with all his children Ezech 36 25 26 27 28. I will sprinkle cleane water vpon you and you shall be cleane from all your filtâ—…enesse and from all your idols will I cleanse you A nâ—…w heart also will I giue you and a new spirit will I put within you and I will take â—…ay the stony heart out of your flesh and I will giue you an heâ—…rt of flesh and I will put my spirit within you and cause you to walke in my statutes and yee shall keepe my iudgments and doe them anâ—… yee shall be my people anâ—… I will be your God From this gratious 〈◊〉 this 〈◊〉 â—…rgument may be framed Those whom God will 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all their sinne and filthinâ—…sse those to whom â—…e will giue a new â—…eart and 〈◊〉 neâ—…â—…pirit those whom hee will make to be his people and cause to walke in his 〈◊〉 and to keepe his iudgements and doâ—… them it is impossible for them either finally or totally to fall from grace But God hath couenanted with all such as are once truly regenerated with all such as are his children that he will cleanse them from all their sinne and filthinesse that he will giâ—…e them a nâ—…w heart and a new spirit that he will make them his people â—…nd 〈◊〉 them to walke in his statutes and to keepe his iudgments and doe them as appeartes by the praemises therefore it is impossible for them either finally or totally to fall from grace Loe here what a multitude of sweete and heauenly promises there are throughout the Scriptures which may fully assure and resolue euery true regenerate man and euery one that is a true member of Iesus Christ that he can neuer finally nor totally fall from grace Not one of all these promises but may assure a doubtfull scrupulous perplexed conscience that he neede not feare a totall or a finall fall from grace if hee be but once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ. Et 〈◊〉 non prosint siâ—…guila cuncta inuant And if that any one of them by it selfe may thus resolue him what will they doe when as they â—…re all conioyned and put together But yet our stout Antagonists that they may leaue no stay or comfort to a Christian â—…oule will frustrate all these gratious promises and blow them quite away at one breath one idle and false euasion forged
can haue any benefit or aduantage by them but when once the condition on our parts is in truth performed by God who workes it for vs then the promises and the things promised are our owne for euer without any further condition This we may see in these three seuerall promises of God Hee that repenteth hee that beleeueth hee that receiueth Iesus Christ shall be saued and shall not come into condemnation Marke 16 16. Iohn 1 12. cap. 3 17 18. cap. 5 24. Acts 2 37 38 39. cap. 3 19. and cap. 16. 30 31. Here it is true that these promises being conditionall and requiring something on our parts before wee shall inioy them wee by the assistance and helpe of God must first truly repent beleiue and receiue Iesus Christ before we shall be saued and freed from condemnation but when we haue once truly repented belieued and receiued Iesus Christ then we are saued and freed from condemnation for euer Now in these three generall promises I would haue you to obserue these two things which make much for my present purpose First that these three promises are the originall charters and assurances that giue vs interest right and title vnto heauen and eternall life and that all these other promises which belong vnto vs after we haue truly belieued repented and receiued Iesus Christ giue vs no new interest right and title to heauen and eternall life but onely serue for to confirme and strengthen that interest right and title to which wee had in them before by these three generall promises that so wee may inioy them with greater comfort and assurance I cannot better expresse it then by this similitude A man hath lands demised to him by a fine or by a deed indented and inrolled or some such originall conuaiance these very originall deedes without any other assurance doe giue him a full perfect and absolute right and interest in those lands Suppose now that after this deuise the party that sold those lands should make a generall release or confirmation of those lands vnto the party to whom they were deuised this release or confirmation giues him no new right or interest in these lands but onely serues to strengthen and confirme the old which was sure and safe enough before So it is heare these three originall promises when once wee doe truly beleiue repent and receiue Christ Iesus they are the originall charters that giue vs a full sure and perfect interest right and title to heauen and eternall life and all these other promises which God makes vnto vs either for himselfe or vs when once we are within the couenant and state of grace serue onely to strengthen and confirme our ancient interest right and title vnto heauen which was sure and safe before they giue vs no new interest right and title to it So that if a man doe but once truly beleiue repent and receiue Christ Iesus this makes him sure of heauen and eternall life though hee had no other promises to assure him but these Secondly obserue that saluation heauen and eternall life in these three radicall and originall promises are suspended onely and depend meerely vpon the performance of the conditions themselues and not vpon the perpetuall and continuall performance of them God doth not say if ye beleiue and beleiue for euer if yee repent and repent for euer if yee receiue Iesus Christ and receiue him for euer yee shall bee saued and haue euerlasting life no there is no such matter in the promises but if wee truly beleiue if we doe truly repent and receiue Christ Jesus in the sinceritie of our hearts though it be but once wee shall be saued and haue euerlasting life because that hee that doth truly beleiue truly repent and receiue Christ Iesus but once doth belieue repent and receiue Christ Iesus for euer he is passed from death to life for euer and shall not come into condemnation Iohn 5 24. Rom 8 1 2. and Marke 16. 16. Suppose a man should promise another an hundred pounds vpon condition that hee should marry his daughter or publikely recant those iniuries which he had done vnto him if there he doth marry his daughter but once or recant those iniuries in publike but once though hee doe not reitterate them hee shail haue the hundred pound because hee hath performed the condition So when as God doth promise vs saluation heauen and eternall life if we belieue râ—…pent and receiue Christ Iesus in sinceritie and in truth if once wee doe but truly beleiue repent and receiue Christ Iesus wee shall certainly be saued and haue heauen and euerlasting life because the condition on which these are suspended is performed I would aske but this question of any of our Antagonists whether any man may not safely make this argument with himselfe Euery one that doth truly belieue repent and receiue Christ Iesus shall be saued and haue euerlasting life But I my selfe do truly belieue repent and receiue Christ Iesus therefore I shall bee saued and haue euerlasting life If this be not a good argument then what benefit comfort or assurance can any Christian take from these or any other promises of the Gospell what claime interest or title can he lay to saluation heauen or eternall life or to what end doe these promises serue If it be a good argument as I thinke none can deny it then certainly heauen saluation and eternall life depend onely vpon the faith and repentance of men and their receiuing of Iesus Christ without any necessary relation to any inclusiue condition if they perseuere withall for he that doth but once truly beleiue repent and receiue Christ Iesus doth beleiue repent and receiue Christ for euer Certainly as Christ himselfe by dying vnto sinne but once is become the authour of eternall saluation to all truly penitent and beleiuing sinners and being raised from the dead dieth no more death hath no more dominion ouer him Rom 6 9 10. Hebr 5 9. cap. 7 27. and cap 9 25 28. So he that is but once truly regenerated and aliue to God through Iesus Christ our Lord dieth no more death hath no more dominion ouer him but he shall liue for euer vnto God and shall not come into condemnation Rom 6 7 to 12 Iohn 5 24. Rom 8 2. 1 Iohn 3 9 14. and Hebr 10 2. how then can he euer finally or â—…otally fall from grace Let all the deuils in hell or men in earth lay their heades together they shall neuer with all their wit and sophistrie delude or ouerthrow this plaine and pregnant truth Againe there are a second sort of promises which are proper peculiar only to those which are in truth regenerated and within the couenant and state of grace of which sort the greater part of all the promises which I haue formerly cited are which promises I haue proued giue them no new interest right or title vnto heauen and eternall life but onely serue to ratifie and confirme that
once truly registred in the booke of life Reu 3. 5. Secondly because God hath promised such that they shall be had in euerlasting remembrance and that he will giue them an euerlasting name which shall not be cut off Psal. 112. 6. Isai. 56. 5. Thirdly because God hath promised all such as are registred in the booke of his remembrance that they shall bee his in the day when hee makes vp his Iewells and that he will spare them euen as a Father spareth his owne sonne that serueth him Mal. 3. 16 17. Fourthly because Christ bids his Disciples to reioyce because their names were written in heauen Luke 10 20. if then their names might haue beene blotted out againe they had had no iust cause of true and solid ioy and so Christs exhortation had beene in vaine Fiftly because they whose names are written in the booke of Life cannot bee seduced by the beast they cannot bee withdrawne from God Reu. 13. 8. Sixtly because those that are receiued in the booke of Life they were written in that booke from the foundation of the world Reu. 17. 8. they were predestinated to Eternall life from all eternity by the determinate counsell and Decree of God which shall stand fast for euer and shall not bee repealed Psal. 89. 28. 33. 34. 2 Tim. 2. 19. Isai. 54. 10. Seuenthly because all such as are written in the Lamhes booke of life shall enter into the new Ierusalem Reu. 21. 27. they shall surely be saued Lastly because there is no variablenesse nor shadow of turning with God Iam. 1. 17. he neuer repent him of his gifts and calling Rom. 11. 29. therefore hee will neuer suffer any of those to fall to die or perish whom he hath registred in his Booke of life Now all those who are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ they haue their names written in heauen and ingrauen in the booke of Life Mal. 3. 16. 17. Luk. 10. 20. Phil. 4 3. Hebr. 12. 23. Reu. 3. 5. cap. 13. 8. cap. 17. 8. c. 20. 12. and c. 21. 27. Therefore they can neuer fall quite away from grace But it may be obiected that mens names may be blotted out of the Booke of life For Moses prayeth to God to blâ—… him 〈◊〉 of the Booke of life rather then the Israelites should bâ—… destroyed Exod. 32. 32. and Paul hee could wish himselfe accursed from Christ for his brethren the Iewes that so they might bee saued Rom. 9. 3. Yea God himselfe saith expresly Exod. 32. 33. Whosoeuâ—…r hath sinned against me him will I bloâ—… out of the booke of Life and Reu. 22. 19. If any man shall take away from the words of this Prophecie God shall take away his part out of the Booke of life All those places proue that mens names may be razed and blotted out of heauen and the Booke of Life I answer first That these wishes and prayers of Moses and Dauid they doe only serue to testifie their exceeding loue and their ardent affection to the Israelites but they doe not proue that such as haue their names written in heauen and ingrauen in the booke of Life may haue them blotted out againe First because they are but meere wishes and desires proceeding only from a passionate loue and zeale they are patheticall and hyperbolicall speeches and doe not necessarily imply either a reality or a possibilitie in 〈◊〉 thing desired and wished for It is common for men to wish and desire things that are impossible out of passion and affection these therefore being but wishes and desires proue nothing at all against mee Secondly these wishes and desires they are not absolute but conditionall they are subordinate to Gods will and therefore they proue nothing absolutely Thirdly they are such wishes and prayers which were altogether impossible to bee performed because they were contrary and repugnant to Gods infinite justice For it could not stand with Gods justice to condemne a righteous man that so many wicked ones might be saued Fourthly these wishes of theirs if they were absolute were impossible to be performed in respect of Gods eternall and immutable Decree God had predestinated Paul and Moses to eternall life and hee had reprobated and cast off these Israelites for whom these wishes of theirs are made these wishes therefore of theirs could not alter and change Gods purpose and decree which is immutable irreuocable and impossible to be repealed Fistly their damnation could not be satisfactory vnto God for the sinnes of their brethren therefore these zealous desires of theirâ—… were impossible to be performed and so they proue not any thing at all against me Secondly to that of Exod. 32. 33. Whosoeuer hath sinned against me him will I blot out of my booke I answer First that this booke here spoken of is only the booke of this temporall but not of eternall life as will easily and plainly appeare by comparing this verâ—…e with the 27 28 29 and 35. verses of the same chapter and with Psal. 119. 13. 15. For the Israelites had there made a Calfe and committed idolatry against God in worshipping of it For which sinne of theirs the sonnes of Leuy by Moses command slew 3000. of their brethren Yet Moses fearing that the justice and wrath of God were not fully satisfied with the death of these 3000. men but that he had some greater temporall judgement in store for them makes recourse vnto God for them by prayer confesseth their sinne and the greatnesse of it and desireth God to pardon it if not then he desires God rather to take away his life and to blot him out of his booke then to suffer so many of his people for to perish To which prayer of his God returnes this answer Whosoeuer hath sinned against mee him will I blot out of my booke that is he shall be slaine and my iudgement of the Plague and Pestilence which I haue prouided for the punishment of this his sinne shall seize vpon him for to cut him off So that Moses his prayer being but to remoue the temporall judgement of the Plague which God did afterwards inflict vpon them for this their sinne this booke of God may here bee well taken and accepted for the booke of this temporall life Hierome Gregorie Parerius and others make this to be the exposition of the place and so it makes not against mee Secondly I answer that there is a difference betweene the booke of Life liuing and betweene that booke of life wherein the righteous are written and recorded Dauid hee makes the difference Psal. 69. 28 Let them bee blotted out of the booke of the liuing and not be written with the righteous A man may be blotted out of the Booke of the liuing that was 〈◊〉 written with the righteous Hâ—… that is written in that booke of liâ—…e wherein the righteous are recorded can 〈◊〉 bee bloâ—…e out as I haue proued before he that is written in 〈◊〉 booke of the liuing may therefore this booke of
God mentioned in this place of 〈◊〉 seeing it is not stiled the booke of Life but only Gods booke must bee intended to bee the booke of the liâ—…ing and not the booke of life Thirdly if you will take this booke of God in this place for the booke of life and compare it with that of Reuel 22. 19. If any 〈◊〉 shall take away from the words of this Prophâ—…cie God shall take away his part out of the Booke of Life I answer then that the meaning of the Scriptures is no more but this Whosoeuer shall sinne against me and take from the words of this Prophecie I will blot him out of my Booke and take his part out of the Booke of life That is I will make it manifest to himselfe and all the world that albeit such a man had a name hee liued and that he had his name registred and recorded in the Booke of life that yet hee was neuer but a dead man and that his name was neuer truly written and recorded in the Booke of life The sense and meaning of these two places is but this He that sinneth against me shall die the death and shal neuer inherite euerlasting life So then you see that those places make nothing at all against mee that those whose names are registred and written in heauen and the Booke of life can neuer bee blotted out againe and so they cannot fall quite away from grace Eleuently those who are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ they cannot depart from him and it is impossible to seduce them From whence this eleuenth Argument doth arise Those that cannot depart away from God nor yet be possibly seduced by any meanes miracles or policies whatsoeuer can neuer finally nor totally fall from grace But all such as are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ can neuer depart away from God God will put â—…is feare into their hearts that they shall not depart from him Ier. 32. 40. And they cannot possibly bee seduced by any meanes miracles or policies whatsoeuer Math. 24. 24. Marke 13. 22. There shall arise false Christs and false Prophets and shall shew great signes and wonders insomuch that if it were possible they shall deceiue the very elect Yea the Beast which did deceiue all the other Inhabitants of the earth could not deceiue them with all his subtilty Reu. 13. 8. and cap. 17. 8. Therefore they can neuer finally nor totally fall from grace The euasions to that place of Ieremy I haue fully answered and defeated heretofore the euasions to the other places remaine now to be answered which are two in number First that these words if it were possible imply only a great difficultie but not an absolute impossibilitie Secondly that it proues only that they cannot bee seduced finally but it proues not that they cannot be seduced totally To the first of these I answer that these words imply an absolute impossibilitie of seducing any such as are the elect of God First because the very emphasis of the words imply as much for these words if it were possible imply a more imposâ—…ible impossibilitie then the word impossible doth Secondly because the end and scope of the text is to proue as much For if any thing could seduce the Saints of God then certainly false Christs and false Prophets comming vnder the colour and habit of Religion and working great signes miracles and wonders to the very admiration of the beholders would seduce them but yet all those great subtile and lying signes and wonders cannot deceiue them it is impossible euen for those to doe it and therefore is it absolutely impossible for any thing to seduce them Thirdly because the Scriptures certifie vs that the Beast and Antichrist whose comming is after the comming of Satan with all power and signes and lying wonders and with all deceiuablenesse of vnrighteousnesse could neuer seduce any of the elect Saints of God whose names were written in the booke of life but only such as neuer had any share or portion in the Booke of life 2 Thes. 2. 10 13 14. Reu. 13. 8. and cap. 17. 8. If hee could neuer seduce any of Gods elect it is then impossible for any to seduce them and so their first euasion is but false for the second euasion that the elect Saints of God cannot bee finally seduced I willingly admit but that they may bee totally seduced notwithstanding that I shall deny For first if they may be seduced totally for a time then the words and sense of the place are not so fully satisfied For he that is totally deceiued is deceiued and so not impossible to bee deceiued as the words and sense import him for to bee Secondly hee that may be deceiued totally may bee deceiued finally to and so both finally and totally which will quite falsifie and delude this Scripture and therefore if it be impossible for the elect Saints of God to bee finally seduced it must be likewise impossible for them to be totally seduced to Lastly the sense and scope of this Scripture and the very litterall words doe fully implie and affirme that they can neither finally nor totally bee seduced and therefore wee must giue these Scriptures their full and perfect sense and meaning and imply them to an impossibilitie of a totall as well as of a finall seducement If you obiect that the Saints of God are oft-times deceiued and seduced I answer that they are oft-times deceiued but yet not seduced they may fall into diuers petty errors in religion but yet they alwayes hold the maine and fundamentall truths 1 Cor. 3. 11. vers 16. and so this Argument standeth good and firme Twelfthly the true regenerate Saints of God they cannot choose but alwayes feare obey serue the Lord and doe his will they cannot doe the euill that they would neither can they sinne vnto death From whence this twelfth Argument will arise Those that cannot choose but alwayes feare obey serue the Lord and doe his will those that cannot doe the euill that they would and those that cannot sinne vnto death it is impossible for them either finally or totally to fall from grace But all those who are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ they cannot choose but alwayes feare obey serue the Lord and doe his will God hath giuen them one heart and one way that they may feare him for euer Ier. 32. 39. God doth put his Spirit into them and cause them to walkâ—… in his statutes and they shall keepâ—… his indgements and doe thâ—…m Ezech. 36. 27. If they should at any time resolue with Ierâ—…miah that they will not make mention of the Lord nor speake any more in his 〈◊〉 his â—…d which is written 〈◊〉 ingranâ—…n in their hearts will bâ—… 〈◊〉 a burning fire shut vp in theis bones it will make theâ—… weâ—…rie of for bearing and they cannot stay but they must presently both speake it and doe it to Ier.
for to hinder it Wherefore since true and sauing Grace is of a permanent perpetuall immortall incorruptible perseuering growing and increasing nature it is impossible for those that haue this Grace as all those who are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ must needs haue it or else they were neuer truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ either finally or totally to fall from it againe euen in respect of the very nature of Grace it sâ—…lfe Lastly it is altogether impossible for such as are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ either finally or totally to fall from grace in respect of the many dangerous consequents which else would ineuitablie follow vpon the contrary and that both in respect of the Trinity in respect of the true Saints of God in respect of grace and in respect of the Church of God in generall but specially of our Church of England First these dangerous consequents would follow euen in respect of the Trinitie and Dietie it selfe For first it would deâ—…ogate from the honour of the Trinitie What greater dishonour could there be vnto the whole Trinitie What greater dishonour to Father Sonne and holy Ghost then this that they should suffer any of those Saints whom they haue chosen for themselues and vndertaken to preserue and keepe to â—…all from grace â—…hat they should begin to build the fabricke of grace in men and yet be vnwilling or vnable for to make an end that they should make so many absolute couenants and promises to preserue and keepe the Saints from falling and not performe their words that they should giue true grace to men and yet repent them of these gifts and take them quite away that they should owne such for their followers their seruants and attendants their children and their friends as should disgrace them by their falls and bring a scandall vpon the profession of their names What would Atheists what would Heathens say if they should heare of this position that the true Saints of God may apostacie and fall away from grace would they not say that it were farre better to haue no God at all that it were farre better to haue an Idoll God then such a God as this as either will not or cannot keepe his Saints from falling from him Certainely this very Doctrine of the Apostacy of the Saints dishonours all the Trinitie in all their sacred and most glorious attributes yea it depriues God of his Dietie it puls him from his throane and sets vp man aboue him it makes God to be no God at all or at least to be no better then an Idoll or an idle God Wherefore in respect of this dishonor which elâ—…e would light vpon the whole Trinitie this Doctrine of the perseuerance of the Saints must needes be true Secondly if the true regenerate Saints of God might Apostatize and fall away from grace it would derogate much from the word and promise of God and Christ. For they haue promised to preserue all such as are once truly regenerated and to keepe them from falling they haue promised that their graces shall not faile that they will giue them perseuerance to the end that they will finish the worke of grace begun within them that they will preserue them blamelesse to the day of Christ and keepe them so that they shall neuer perish but haue euerlasting life as I haue pâ—…oued at large before If then the Saints of God might either finally or totally â—…ll from grace where then were the truth of God and Christ where were the performance of their word and promises wee might then say that all these promises of God were but false and counterfeite and so we should make God and Christ no better then the Diuell himselfe who is a lyar and the father of lyes Iohn 8. 44. Yea I may boldly say that this assertion of the Apostacie of the Saints would quite ouerthrow the whole frame and fabricke of the word of God For take the whole Scripture from the beginning to the very end of it the whole frame and fabricke of it serues to no other end and purpose but to take away all from man in matters of grace and to attribute all to God that so he only and not man might haue the praise and glory of all Now this assertion of the Apostacie of the Saints it takes all away from God and attributes all to man that so man might glory in himselfe onely and not in the Lord. It giues a man free will to reiect or receiue grace at the first and it giues him full power and ability to reiect or to retaine grace after hee hath receiued it it takes away Gods prouidence kingdome soueraigntie and power ouer man it exempts man wholly from his jurisdiction it makes man an absolute creature it makes him a God and Lord ouer himselfe whereas the Scripture dorh take man of from his owne legges and subiects him wholly vnto God in whose hands his life his thoughts his will his waies and all his actions are and so it dissolues and ouerturnes the whole frame and fabricke of the Scriptures and strikes at the very foundation and roote of all religion Wherefore this Doctrine of the Apostacy of the Saints can neuer be admitted to bee tâ—…ue euen in this respect and so my present assertion must be sound and orthodox Thirdly if the true regenerate Saints of God might fall quite away from the state of grace it would derogate much from the great goodnesse and the infinite mercy and loue of God vnto his children For if those Saints of God might fall quite away from grace where then were the exceeding riches of Gods mercy where were the gratiousnesse and infinite goodnesse of his nature where were the freenesse the constancy and vnchangablenesse of his loue If you obiect that the fault is not in the loue of God to them but in their want of loue to him I answere first that Gods loue to them is free and voluntary Hosea 14. 5. I will loue them freely therefore if God should quite withdraw his loue from them for their disobedience vnto him this freenesse of Gods loue would be much tainted and blemished and the breach would light on God Secondly Gods loue to them is the cause of their loue to him 〈◊〉 Iohn 4. 10. 19. and it is the loue mercy of God which should preserue and keepe the saints in obedience loyalty and subiection vnto him yea God himselfe hath promised to preserue their whole spirit soule and body blamelesse vnto the comming of our Lord Jesus Christ. 1 Thâ—…s 5. 23 24. If therefore God should suffer them to sin against him and so to incurre his displeasure whereas hee hath vndertaken to preserue them blamelesse vnto the comming of Iesus Christ the breach must bee first on Gods part in suffering them to sinne and not on theirs who hath no power of their owne without the power and ayde of God to keepe themselues from sinne
If a man had a deare intire friend who was like to perish vnlesse he did relieue and helpe him if now hee should absolutely promise him to sucour aud releiue him and then faile him at the last if now this man should perish the blame would now light vpon him that should haue helped him and not vpon him that perisheth God is able to keepe his Saints from falling from him Iude 24. and he hath promised for to doe it Psal. 37. 24. Psal. 155. 1. Psal. 121. 3 7 8. Psa. 145. 13 20. He that hath giuen vs grace hath promised to preserue and keep it for vs because we cannot doe it of our selues If then wee might loose this grace and fall quite from it the blame would light on God and on the whole Trinitie who are both able and onely able to preserue and keepe the saints from falling and haue likewise promised for to doe it and not on the saints themselues who are not able of themselues to keepe themselues in the loue of God and to preserue themselues from falling from him and therefore this your Doctrine can neuer bee admitted to be true Fourthly if the true regenerate saints of God might fall quite away from the state of grace it would derogate much from the omnipotencie and mightie power of the Trinitie and from the vertue and efficacie of the meanes of grace For if these might fall from grace where then were the omnipotencie and mightie power of God and Christ which should preserue and keepe them through faith vnto saluation where were the efficacie and power of the holy Ghost where were the strength the life mighty operation of the word of God and of the meanes of grace which should conquer and subdve the very Prince of darknesse and trample him vnder feete which should cast downe imaginations the strong holds and forts of sinne and Iust and euery thing that exalteth it selfe against the knowledge of God and bring into captiuity euery thought to the obedience of Christ where were the efficacie and power of the death and passion of Iesus Christ which should destroy out of the Saints the workes of the Diuill the power of Satan and the whole body of sinne where were the efficacie power of that feare which God will put into their harts that they may not depart from him Certainely this assertion would derogate very much from the omnipotencie and mightie power of the whole Trininie and from the efficacy and power of grace and of the meanes of grace and therefore it cannot be admitted to be true and orthodox Fifthly if the saints of God might Apostatize and fall from the state of grace it would derogate much from the infinite justice and wisdome of almightie God For when as God shall haue once accepted of the death and passion of his only Sonne in full satisfaction for the sins of all his true and faithfull members when God shall promise for the merits of this his Son to pardon all their sins and to remember their iniquities no more when Christ shall purchase grace and all things appertaining to life and godlinesse when he shall purchase perseuerance heauen and eternall happinesse for them and God shall in his justice promise to make all these things good vnto them if after all this they should fall from grace and bee depriued of all these things which Christ hath purchased for them where then will this infinite justice of God appeare Yea where will his infinite wisdome bee Can it stand together with Gods infinite wisdome to discourage and deiect the hearts and soules of any of his saints to weaken and abate their loue to him and to make them cold and negligent in his seruice to bring a scandall vpon himselfe and vpon the profession and professors of his name which are the ineuitable consequencies of this your doctrine what justice or what wisdome would there be in God if this were true Doubtlesse very little or none at all and therefore this doctrine of perseuerance must be true Sixthly if the saints of God might fall from the state of grace it would much eclipse the efficacie of Christs death and passion and the vertue andr powe of his intercession Where were the efficacy where were the merits where were the end the worth and benefit of Christs death and passion if it could not saue men to the vtmost and preserue them from falling from the state of grace to what end and purpose would his death and passion serue If this were true then Christs should be but an imperfect Sauiour a Sauiour and yet no Sauiour a Iesus at one time for to saue vs and yet afterwards a Iudge for to condemne vs. Then a man might be oft times saued and oft times damned one howre in the state of grace another in the state of damnation a man might be ost times saued in one month in one weeke and in one day And if so where were the efficacie of the death where were the vertue of the intercession of Christ Christ by his death and passion hath purchased eternall redemption for his true and faithfull members and hath perfected those that are sanctified for â—…uer and now he is in heauen he makes perpetuall intercession to his Father for them to keepe them in his owne name to preserue them from euill and from falling from him If then those members of Iesus Christ might notwithstanding fall from the state of grace which once they haue the very death and intercession of Iesus Christ would bee of very little or of no effect and the very dearest of Gods saints â—…nd children could reape no benefit or comfort from them Seuenthly if this were true that the Saints of God might fall away from the state of grace it would make the sweete and comfortable working of Gods Spirit in the hearts of all Gods children to bee but a meere delusion and imposture or at least but a meere lying fancie and a vaine conceite For this I am well assured of that euery sanctfied growen and experienced christian which hath felt the working of Gods Spirit in his heart can testifie that the Spirit of God hath so sealed this truth vnto his soule and so firmely settled and ingrauen it in his heart that he can neuer depart away from God or fall finally or totally from grace Wherefore this position which would falsifie this working of Gods Spirit in the hearts and soules of all his faithfull children must needes be false and odious and cannot be admitted Eightly if this should be admitted that the true regenerate saints of God might fall from grace it would rob the Lord of the hearts and soules of all his saints it would much abate if not quite extinguishing the zeale and seruency of their loue to him If men could not bee sure of their owne saluation if they could not bee sure of Gods constant and immutable loue to them if they
quite away from grace and so loose the reward of all the workes which they had done you should haue few or none that should deny themselues or yet forsake their carnall friends and pleasures or their present worldly honours riches and preserments which after your computation are like to be more permanent then their graces that so they might seeke vnto the Lord alone and serue him diligently with all their hearts and soules you should haue few or none at all that would be forwards diligent feruent in the worke and seruice of the Lord. Wherfore this assertion must needes be false and dangerous euen in this respect and so cannot be admitted for a truth Eleuenthly if the true regenerate saints of God might fall from grace it would rob the Lord of many zealous and faithfull prayers and it would make that exquisite forme of prayer which Christ himselfe hath framed for vs to be but vaine and idle for if our perseuerance in grace should not depend on God but on our selues as our Antagonists doe and must affirme or else they would to wrecke how few men would there bee that would power out their hearts and soules before the Lord in feruent and faithfull prayers If it were in mens owne power to take vp to preserue and to reiect their graces at their pleasures what neede men to pray to God at all if God doth nothing in this businesse our prayers vnto him were vaine and idle God should haue no prayers at all for any spirituall things if this were true and it would be to no purpose for to pray vnto him for grace and perfeuerance Peter then should be very much mistaken in praying thus to God for those Saints to whom he writes The God of all grace who hath called you vnto his eternall glory by Christ Iesus make you perfect stablish strengthen settle you Paul should thē be mistaken in praying thus for the Thesolonians The Lord make you to abound and increase in lone one towards annother towards all men to the end that he may establish your hearts vnblamable in holinesse before God euen our Father and stablish you in euery good word and worke For hee which establisheth vs with you in Christ is God Dauid should be then mistaken in praying vnto God to vphold and stablish him with his free Spirit and that prayer which Christ himselfe hath framed and commanded vs to vse should be but superflous and to little purpose For who would or could pray thus to God thy kingdome come thy will be done en earth as it is in heauen leadivs not into temptation but deliuer vs from euill if God had no rule and sway ouer him if God did not giue him perseuerance and preserue his gra◅es in him if man himselfe had free-will and power to take and to resist grace to preserue and keepe it or for to reiect it Wherefore seeing that this assertion it it were admitted would robbe the Lord of many faithfull prayers which now his Saints doe make vnto him for their perseuerance and seeing it would make that very prayer which Christ himselfe hath recorded and composed for vs to bee superflous vaine and idle it cannot be admitted to be true Twelfthly if this should be admitted for a truth that the Saints of God might fall quite away from the state of Grace it would take away all absolute and irrespectiue predestination and election to eternall life one of these three must then necessarily follow that either the Saints of God who are predestinated to eternall life may fall from grace and perish or that there are some men who are truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ who were neuer predestinated and elected to saluation or that God did only predestinate men vnto saluation out of the foresight of their faith their workes and perseuerance which are all ex diametro opposite and contrary to the Scriptures to the Fathers to the Doctrine of the Church of England and to all orthodox and Protestant Diuines of moderne times and therefore cannot be admitted Lastly if the true regenerate Saints of God might fall quite away from grace out of the freedome and libertie of their owne wills then saluation or damnation should depend meerely vpon the fickle and vn constant will of man and not vpon the stable and immutable decree and purpose of Almighty God then man and not God should bee the author of his owne saluation and so saluation should not bee of God that sheweth mercy and disposeth all things according to the purpose of his owne free will and pleasure but of man that willeth and perseuereth out of the strength and power of his owne free will Man should then bee his owne God his owne gouernour and director his owne judge and sauiour if this were once admitted to be true which would bee a great disparagement to Gods supremacie and to the death and passion of Iesus Christ. And therefore in regard of these dangerous consequences in respect of the whole Trititie this doctrine cannot be allowed to be true that the Saints of God may finally or totally fall away from the habit and state of true and sauing grace Secondly as this Doctrine of the finall or totall Apostacie of the Saints would produce many dangerous consequencies in respect of the whole Trinitie in respect of Father Sonne and holy Ghost so would it doe the like in respect of regenerate men themselues For fi◅st it would cause men for to call Gods truth Gods word and promises into question for when as a man shall reade in diuers places of the Scripture that the righteous and those that trust in God shall neuer bee remoued that they shall continue to the end and neuer faint nor faile that God will perfect and finish the worke of Grace within them and preserue them blamelesse to the day of Christ that hee will keepe them so that they shall neuer fall nor perish and the like if this should stand for currant truth that the Saints of God may notwithstanding fall from the very state of Grace it would cause men for to doubt of the truth of Gods word and promises and to account no better of the word of God then of a fable or a meere imposture it would cause them to denie the Faith and to turne either Atheists or Pagans at the last and therefore it cannot bee admitted Secondly it would depriue true Christians of all true happinesse in this present life it would make them to bee but miserable and wretched men when as the word of God reputes them happy and stiles them blessed men For if it be grace and that only which makes the Saints of God to be happy men euen in this world of misery as the Scripture saith it is if it were possible for Christians for to loose this grace and to fall from it againe it were impossible for them to be happy here For happinesse is such a stable and perpetuall
grace and therefore cannot be admitted euen in this respect Thirdly this assertion if it were admitted would vtterly disanull abolish and take away the very roote and chiefe of graces euen true justifying and sauing faith For faith as it is defined Heb. 11. 1. Is the substance of things hoped for and the euidence of things not seene it is a sure euidence of heauen and eternall life Wherefore those that haue this faith must not only beleeue that God is but also that he is a rewarder of all such as doe diligently seeke him they must bee perswaded of all Gods promises and imbrace them as their owne Hebr. 11. 6. 13. and with faithfull Abraham Rom. 4. 19. 20 21. they must not stagger at the promises of God through vnbleâ—…fe but they must be strong in faith they must be fully perswaded that as God is able so likewise hee will bee faithfull to performe what euer hee hath promised He that hath a true justifying and sauing faith hee must be able to apply Christ Iesus and all the promises of the Gospel to himselfe he must appropriate and ascertaine them vnto himselfe so as to make them his owne for euâ—…r hee must be able thus to argue He that heareth the word of Christ and beleeueth on him that sent him hath euerlasting life and shall not come into condemnation but is passed from death to life Iohn 5. 24. he that trusteth and waiteth on God shall neuer bee remoued but shall stand fast for euer he shall mount vp with eagles wings he shall run and not be weary he shall walke and not be faint Psal. 125. 1. Isai. 40. 31. God will put his feare into his heart and they shall not depart from him Ier. 32. 40. But I doe heare the word of Christ I beleeue on him that sent him I doe waite and trust on him therefore I haue euerlasting life I am passed from death to life and shall not come into condemnation I shall neuer be remoued from the state of grace but shall stand fast for euer I shall runne and not bee weary I shall walke and not faint I shall not depatt from him He that cannot argue thus hee that cannot thus apply and assume these promises of God vnto himselfe hath no faith at all he that hath faith and is able thus for to apply them can assure himselfe that hee shall perseuere vnto the end and that he shall neither finally nor totally fall from grace yea and must assure him selfe so from these and such like promises or else he hath no faith in them So that if this assertion of the Apostacie of the Saints were once admitted it would quite abolish and vtterly take away all true and sauing faith whose property it is not onely not to faile Luke 22. 32. but likewise to assume these promises of finall and totall perseuerance to it selfe Fourthly if this assertion were once admitted it would take away all certaintie and assurance of saluation for if the true regenerate Saints of God might after their true inscition into Christ either finally or totally fall from grace then they could neuer bee assured of saluation where euer there is a possibilitie of falling away from grace there can bee no full and perfect assurance of saluation a man can neuer bee surâ—… of the end that is not assured of the meanes for to attaine it perseuerance in the state of grace is the meanes for to attaine saluation and therefore if men could not be assured of their perseuerance they could neuer be assured of saluation which depends vpon it If a man might fall totally from grace hee could not be assured of saluation because he cannot bee assured of this whether he shall rise againe whether God will cut him off in his sinnes before hee be ingrafted into Christ againe Now this grace of assurance is a speciall fauour which God bestowes vpon his Saints and children it is the very anchor and piller that supports their soules and it is such a grace as all the Saints of God both may and ought to haue without any speciall reuelation as appeares by diuers pregnant places of Scripture which for breuity sake I will only quote and not set downe at large as Iob. 19. 25 26. cap. 11. 15 18. cap. 13. 16. cap. 16. 19. Psal. 27. 1. Psal. 46. 1. to 8. Isai. 25. 8 9. cap. 50. 7 8 9. Iohn 5. 24. cap. 14. 27. Rom. 8. 35. to the end cap. 14. 8. 2 Cor. 5. 1. to 10. Ephes. 3. 12. Phil. 1. 21. 23. Cor. 3. 4. 1 Thes. 1 4 5. 1 Tim. 1. 7. 12. 2 Tim. 2. 19. cap. 4. 7 8 18. Heb. 2. 15. cap. 10. 34 35. 1 Pet. 4. 19. 1 Iohn 3. 2. cap. 4. 17 18. cap. 5 18 19. 20. Wherefore since this doctrine of the Apostacie of the Saints would vtterly abrogate falsifie and ouerthrow the grace and doctrine of assurance and certainty of saluation it must needs bee a false dangerous and pernitious doctrine which cannot be admitted Fifthly if this were once admitted for a truth it would take away and vtterly abolish in the Saints the grace of loue and of joy and comfort in the holy Ghost it would take away the causes of loue and joy and so consequently these graces themselues which are the very end of the Gospell and in which the very kingdome of God consists as you may reade Iohn 15. 11. Rom. 14. 17. and cap. 15. 13 wherefore it cannot be admitted euen in this respect Lastly if this assertion were once admitted it would make true and sauing grace to be but a meere morrall perswasion and not a worke of the holy Ghost a thing that was meerely subiect to our owne wills it would destroy the kingdome of grace within vs and make vs Kings and Lords ouer grace whereas grace hath a kingdome and dominion ouer vs. If a man had liberty to cast off grace at his pleasure then grace should haue no power no kingdome or dominion ouer him then the kingdome of grace and the kingdome of Iesus Christ in the hearts of his Saints should be but a meere fiction and a fabulous conceite whereas the Scriptures do informe vs to the contrary almost in euery page If wee may cast of the yoke of Iesus Christ if we may cast of grace at our pleasures where then is the kingdome of Christ and the kingdome of grace that is within vs An earthly Prince who hath but a kingdome ouer the bodies of his subiects is able for to keepe them from rebellion and from casting of his yoake at their pleasure Christ Iesus grace they haue not only a kingdome ouer vs but a kingdome in vs to and that not ouer our bodies but ouer our soules and bodies ouer the whole man and the whole foule and therefore wee cannot but be subiect to them and wee haue no power for to cast them off Grace it captiuates the whole soule the whole man it brings euery thought into subiection vnto
leade you to imbrace this error If you will but examine your owne hearts well you shall finde that the thing which leades you to imbrace this error is either the learning or the fame of some particular men that do defend it or else some secret hatred malice either to all or to some particular men that doe oppose it or else some felfe conceite and some high opinion which you do attribute to your owne conceites without any due examination of them by the word of God or else it is some desire of singularity or fame or the hope of gaine honour preferment one of these I may be bold to say is the cause that moues you to patronize this error and not the loue of God or of his truth Remember therefore that you are bought with a price that you should not be the seruants of men that the word of God is the rule of life and doctrine and not the word of men remember that if you are the sheepe of Christ you must heare his voice and his only you must not hearken to the voice of strangers let their learning or their parts bee what they will No men more apt to erre then those of greatest parts and learning especially when as their parts and persons are not sanctified The greatest schollers haue alwaies broached and propagated the greatest and the most dangerous errors Wherefore neuer pinne your faith to the fickle opinions of fraile and mortall men especiallly of such men in whose liues the practise and power of religion shines not forth but examine all things by the word of God and though an Angel from heauen much lesse a Diuell from hell or a carnall man from earth should bring any other doctrine to you then what you finde to be warranted and recorded there receiue him not but let him bee accursed Sure I am that this doctrine of the finall or totall Apostacie of the Saints hath no ground or footing for it in the word of God if you will but take the paines to search the Scriptures you shall finde it to bee so and therefore let not the opinion or fame of any particular man that doth patronize this error ouersway your judgments against the Scriptures the word of God And as for all other priuate by respects which may ingage you to adore this error remember that Gods glory and the loue of truth if not the good and welfare of the Church should ouer ballance and surpasse them all Better is it for to loose the world with all the fame the riches honours and preferments in it then to loose the Lord of truth and his euerlasting fauour to loose both soule and body at the last in hope of gaining honouror prefernâ—…ent now Wherefore lay aside all sinister by respects and consider how many great dangerous and pernitious consequencies will ineuitable follow vpon this doctrine of the finall and totall Apostacy of the Saints and then you cannot but disclaime it and detest it from your soules and euen fromyour hearts imbrace this orthodox and sound position which here I do defend That such as are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ by a true and liuely faith can neither finally nor totally fall from grace Hauing thus as I suppose so fully proued the truth of this position by arguments and reasons drawne from the Scriptures that no man can be able to gainsay it For further satisfaction in the point I will now produce some humane authorities for to proue it which authorities I shall reduce to these three generall heads First I will proue that this was the doctrine of the ancient Fathers of the Church 〈◊〉 that this was and is the doctrine of all Protestant Churâ—… beyond the Seas Thirdly that this was and is the doctrine of the Church of England For the first of these that this was the doctrine of the ancient Fathers of the Church I shall manyfâ—… it by their owne authorities which I will vouch in â—…atine as I finde them printed lest I should giue the opposites any occasion for to carpe at mee or wrong the authors or the reader in the translation especially since I cite these Fathers to satisfie the learned not the ignorant I will first begin with the auncient of the Fathers and so discend to these of latter times Dionysius Areopagita Dionysius Areopagita who liued in the Apoftles times and as himselfe records it in his 11. Epistle to Apollophanus the Philosopher was 25. yeares of age at the death of Christ though others doubt of it hath deliuered and recorded this very doctrine in his booke de diuinis nominibus cap. 7. His words are these Diuina fides est stabilis credentium sedes qua hos in veritate locat in ipsisque veritatem impersuasibili identitate certam simplicem veritatis notionem habentibus ijs qui crediderunt Nam profectò si scientia cognoscentium cognitorum coniunctrix est ignorantia verò mutationis semper ex se ignoranti suae diuisionis est author eum qui in veritate credit iuxta Scripturae fidem nihil remouebit à verae fidei autore in quo constantiam immobilis atque immutabilis identitatis habebit In the 8. chapter of the same booke about the end of the chapter he hath these words Verum enim profectò hanc salutem non praeter intentionem Scripturae sanctae vt bonitate cuncta saluantem qua sunt omnia ab suorum prolapsione bonorum redimentem praedicare meritò possumus quantum cuiusque saluâ—…ndorum admittet naturae Idciâ—…cò etiam redemptionem iam theologi nominant ex quo sinit quae verê sunt ad id caedere vt non sint Ex eo item quod et fi quid deliquerint ab ordine suo aberrauerint imminutionem aliquam perfectionis bonorum suorum passa fuerint Hac etiam parte à passione imbecillitate ac priuatione reddimit impleus quod deest paterno affectu infirmitatem supplens at que à 〈◊〉 â—…rigons imò in pulchro fistens quod effluxerat bonuÌ„ reparans ae disponens ordinis quod deest in illo atque positionis exornans integrumque perficiens ab omnibus absoluens 〈◊〉 atibus And a little before he hath these words Itaque vt verum dixerim hoc magis est diuinae iustitiae proprium nequaquam emollire atque enermare optimorum quorumcun que masculum sensum largitione carnalium neque si quis id conetur agere eas sine adiutorio linquere sed eos in praeclâ—…o inflexibilique statu solidare eisque cum sint huiusmodi secundum merita reddere So that by this most ancient Diuines opinion these that are truly faithfull can neuer fall quite away from grace Iustin Martyr Iustin Martyr who flourished in the yeare of Lord 163. and somewhat after concurreth in opinion with vs in his Explic. quaest à Gent. Christ. positarum quaest 23. For there
seuerall Conferences at Hage recorded by Brandius and Bertius haue concurred in the contrary assertion I confesse that Iacobus Arminius in Apolog aduers Artic quosdam Theologicos Respons ad Artic secundum in Examinatione Praedestinationis Perkinsis that Conradus Vorstius in amica collatione cum Piscatore sect 108 that Nicholaus Greuinchouius and Bertius in his Hyminaeo desertore sine de Sanctorum Apostasia and others of the Arminian crew to whom Master Mountague is much beholding haue beene of this opinion That faith once had may be lost againe But that any sound and orthodox Protestant Diuines were of this opinion in any of their decisions writings or resolutions that I neuer heard or read of as yet But will you know now who are Master Mountagues Protestant Diuines who haue so much opposed our present assertion and consented to the Church of Rome in the totall and finall losse of faith once had Surely they must and can be no other but those whose reasons arguments and quotations both out of Scriptures and Fathers Master Mountague hath ttanscribed in his Gagge for he intimates as much himselfe Now what Diuines are these Surely I must needes informe you who they are because they are worth the knowledge his two chiefe Diuines they are Bellarmine and Bertius the one a Cardinall and cheise pillar of the Church of Rome the other the strongest pillar and stoutest Champion of the Arminian faction It may be hee hath praid in some ayde from the Rhemists but I can assure you that all his quotations that are there cited are transcribed either out of Bellarmine in his 3. booke de Iustif cap. 14. or out of Bertius in his Hymeneo disertore siue de Apostasia sanctorū and most of them especially the quotations out of the Fathers are not to be found in any other Writer but in Bertius only Are these your Protestant Diuines Mr. Mountague were there no other Protestant Diuines from whence to fetch resolutions decisious but from these or can you bee so strangely impudent as to grace these two notorious and famous men the one knowne for the greatest Papist the other for the chiefest Arminian that euer was with the stile of most Protestaut Diviues no meruaile then is these men bee your Protestants that you stile all others that dissent from them not Protestants but Caluinists Puritans and Nouellers and that you stile this doctrine of the totall finall perseuerance of the Saints a Puritan Doctrine Wherefore good Reader take this short Nota with thee in the by that all M. Mountagues Protestants are none but Papists and Arminians and all his Puritans Nouellers and Caluinists whom hee so much lasheth none but sound and Orthodox Protestants who assent not to Arminius and the Church of Rome and what must Mr. Mountague be then in the meane time Surely a Papist or Arminian if not both or worse then both But I passe this ouer and come to the second thing which is to proue the totall and finall perseuerance of the Saints in the state of Grace to bee the receiued and approued doctrine of all Protestant and reformed Churches beyond the Seas by their seuerall Articles and Confessions and by their Synods which haue so resolued it That this is the receiued and approued doctrine of their Articles and Confessions it is euident and plaine First by the latter Confession of Helvetia Artic. 9. Because that the strength of the flesh and reliques of the old man are not of such great force in the regenerate that they can wholly quench the worke of the Spirit therefore the faithfull are called free yet so that they do acknowledge their infirmity and glory no whit at all of their Free-will So that by the expresse words of this Confession the regenerate Saints of God can neuer fall totally from grace because the strength of the flesh and reliques of the old man are not of such great force in the regenerate that they can wholly quench the worke of the spirit So Artic. 10. of the same confession The Saints are chosen in Christ by God vnto a sure end and Artic. 15. Wee who are once justified are not only cleansed from sinne and purged and holy but also indued with the righteousnesse of Christ yea and acquitted from sinne death and condemnation finally we are righteous and heires of eternall life And Article 16. True faith is the meere gift of God because God of his power doth giue it to his elect according to measure and therefore it is called the faith of Gods elect This faith doth pacifie the conscience and doth open vnto vs a free accesse to God it doth keepe vs in our dutie which wee owe to God and to our neighbour and doth fortifie our patience in aduersitie and it doth bring forth good fruites of all sorts c. By this it is euident that our assertion is the positiue doctrine of the Helu◅◅◅◅tian Church So is it also of the Bohemian as it is manifest by the 6. Article of their Confession which saith That true faith doth alwayes lift vp him that hath it and assures him that in and for Christ he assuredly hath and shall haue for euer eternall life according to his true promise which hee confirmed with an oath saying Verily I say vnto you hee that beleeueth on me hath eternall life For whomsoeuer God doth iustifie to them he doth giue the holy Ghost and by him hee doth regenerate them as hee promised by the Prophet saying I will giue them a new heart and I will put my Spirit in the middest of them that as before sinne had reigned in them to death so also grace might reigne by righteousnesse vnto eternall life through Iesus Christ. Now they that attaine to this iustification by Christ our Lord are taught to take vnto themselues true and assured comfort out of this grace and bounty of God to inioy a good and quiet conscience before God to be certaine of their owne saluation ond to haue it confirmed to them by this meanes that seeing they are the sonnes of God they shall also after death in the resurrection bee made heires The French Church doth likewise concurre with vs in our assertion in the 21. and 22. Articles of their confession which say That true faith is giuen only to the Elect not that they might once only be brought into the right way but rather that they might bee forward therein vnto the end because that as the beginning is of God so is also the accomplishment Therefore it is so farre that faith should extinguish the desire to liue well and holily that it doth rather increase and kindle it in vs whereupon good workes doe necessarily follow with which the confession of Belgia artic 23. 24. doth fully agree The Confession of Saxonie Artic. 3. 7. 9. concurreth with vs For it testifieth vnto vs. That the Error of doubting is altogether heathenish that it doth abolish the Gospell and take away all true
and liuely faith they are the sons of God the Spirit of God doth moue them to those things which are holy and right that so they may not wittingly commit any things to the contrary much lesse perseuere in them notwithstanding oft-times out of the weakenesse of the flesh they sin doe not according to faith but yet they neuer commit those sins which waste the conscience nor those which doe forth-with exclude them from the kingdome of God which reason they doe backe likewise with this Syllogisme drawne from the Scriptures Hee that beleeueth that Iesus is the Christ is borne of God 1 Ioh. 5. but hee that is borne of God the same Apostle in the same Epistle testifies cap. 3. that hee doth not sin neither can hee sin therefore â—…ee who doth truly and liuingly beleeue the Gospell of Christ can abide in no sinne which doth waste the conscience For euery one who commits such a sin as this hath neither seene nor knowne God Wherefore seeing that this Diot hath resolued that such a one as hath true faith cannot commit such a sinne as doth waste his conscience but only sinnes of infirmitie which doe not cast men wholly from the state of grace it hath likewise by this resolued against Mr. Mountagues assertion that faith once had may bee both finally totally lost againe so they haue not consented to the Church of Rome in this as hee most falsely doth affirme Againe this whole Diot haue with one vnanimous consent resolued it that all such as haue true faith both may and must be assured of their saluation because that God hath vndoubtedly promised eternall life to all such as are iustified doe 〈◊〉 beleeue in him which promise hee will punctually vndoubtedly performe in the time which hee hath promised because that Christ doth call elect all his not to a temporarie kingdome grace or life but to an eternall because that God himselfe will inable them cause them for to perseuere because this liuing iustifying faith is in it selfe eternall life those that haue it euen from the first time of their hauing of it haue euerlasting life because this faith is preserued in those that haue it not by their owne power or might but by the very power of God of the holy Ghost because this faith is of an incorruptible of a growing increasing and neuer failing nature as you may reade from pag. 461. to 538. Therefore by this expresse resolution vpon these pregnant and sure grounds which doe all proue our assertion to the full it is most euident and apparant to all the world that this famous Diot and so all the Protestants in Germanie who assented to it and were present at it haue resolued and determined That the state of true and sauing graece that true and liuely faith once had can neither finally nor totally be lost againe How base how trecherous and perfidious then is Mr. Mountague who would thus traduce this noble Diot and all the German Protestants in recording it vnto the world that they assented to the church of Rome in this that faith once had might bee lost againe when as they did expresly resolue it to the Contrary Well Mr. Mountague I must needs speake plainly to you and let all the world iudge whether I doe amisse in it or no as in many other things touching this particular controuersie so especially in traducing and abusing of this famous Diot you haue shewed your selfe a base an impudent a lying and seditious Varlet and a man vnworthy to liue in any Protestant Church or Christian Common-wealth and I will euidence and proue it by these 4. particulars First in that you traduce corrupt and falsifie the judgement of a whole Protestant Synod Secondly in that you traduce and falsifie it in such a manner saying that all the Protestants in Germany assented to the Church of Rome in this Diot at Ratisbon in this point of falling finally and totally from grace as if all the Protestants in Germany were turned Papists Thirdly in that you do it to this end to bring in Popery and Arminianisme into our Church to make the world beleeue that Popery and Protestanisme are all one and that Protestants haue heretofore alwayes yeelded and submitted to the Church of Rome in matters of Doctrine and therefore they should doe so now and so the end of this your falsification of this Synod is but to perswade all Protestants to turne Papists at least in this particular point Fourthly in that you would father the base bratts of that Arminian Bertius vpon this Protestant and famous Diot that so his dangerous workes might be countenanced approued and receiued as sound and orthodox vnder the name and colour of this Diot For if it please Mr. Mountague to remember himselfe those Scriptures reasons and authorities of Fathers which he citeth in his Gagge cap. 20. as the reasons arguments and grounds which moued Bucer and the Diot of Ralisbon to assent to the Church of Rome in this point of falling from grace as they are not to be found in the disputation of Ralisbon wherein the contrary was resolued so all and euery one of these Scriptures reasons and Fathers Clemens Romanus a meere suppositions and forged Writer only excepted were transcribed out of this Bertius his Apostatia Sanctorum where they are all and only to bee found Now hee who professing himselfe to be a Protestant and receiuing so many fauours from our Church shall putposely traduce and falsifie such a generall and famous Synod or Diot as this in such a base and infamous manner and that to such dangerous sinister and wicked ends as these how ill hee doth deserue of God and man especially of this our Mother Church whom hee doth labour to corrupt and seduce by this his jugling let all men judge But to passe this ouer which the loue I owe vnto the truth and to my Mother Church could not suffer mee to smother or conceale I will now proceed to giue you some farther and cleare euidence to proue the totall and finall Perseuerance of the Saints to be the doctrine of the Protestant Churches beyond the Seas Concordia Lutherana which was agreed vpon and resolued and set out by the consent of all the Protestants in Germanie against those who did oppose the Augustine Confession informes vs that this was one Article of the Protestants beleife touching justification which they did both teach and confesse That albeit true beleeuers and regenerate men were liable to many infirmities and spotts euen to their death yet that they ought not for to doubt either of the righteousnesse imputed vnto them by faith or of eternall saluation but that they ought firmely to resolue that God is reconciled to them in Christ according to his sure word and promise And though there bee much infirmitie in the Saints which makes them to complaine with Paul yet God doth neuer impute this
in their learned labours set forth by publike authority maintained propagated and defended this my present assertion and there is not one Orthodox English Diuine that did either publikely in the Schooles or in any writings set forth by publike approbation maintaine the contrary Therefore this my present assertion is the receiued positiue and the resolued Doctrine of all the learnedest and most judicious Diuines of the Church of England For the Major it cannot be denied the Minor I shall proue by many particular authors I will not stand to mention those many learned Diuines throughout the Kingdome who in their seuerall Sermons and Lectures haue maintained and defended this my present assertion euery man knowes that this assertion is publikely preached throughout the Kingdome for orthodox â—…urrent truth neither was there any one that euer did positiuely deliuer the contrary in any Sermon that euer I heard of with publike approbation till Master Mountagues Appeale was published Some three or foure did preach it as I haue heard before but they were presently conuented for it and injoyned to recant How this my assertion hath from time to time beene maintained and defended in the publike Schooles I neede not for to mention it Sure I am that the Schooles of the Vniuersity of Oxford haue alwaies defended it and so haue the Schooles of Cambridge to and I neuer heard that the contrary was publikely defended and maintained in them That which I intend mainely to insist vpon is the learned labours and writings of the chiefest worthies and learne dest of our Church in which my present assettion is recorded and defended Not to make mention of venerable Bede or of Anselme and Bradwardyu both Arch-bishops of Canterbury who haue declared their opinions vpon record in defence and maintenance of this my assertion I will onely mention such writers of our English Church as haue beene famous and eminent since the reformation I will begin with that godly and learned Martyr William Tindall who liued in the beginning of the reformation Who in his Treatises what the Church is and whether it may erre how a member of Christs true Church sinneth and erreth and yet sinneth and erreth not and how hee is yet a sinner and may erre and of the manner and order of our election which you shall finde in his workes pag 257 to 261. hath recorded it That the true regenerate Saints of God can neuer sinne so farre as quite to loose that habit and seede of grace which is within them nor yet to fall quite from God These Treatises of his are onely to this effect that the true regenerate Saints of God can neuer finally nor totally fall from grace Master Latimer Tyndalls contemporanie a man of worth and note in the times where in he liued in his Sermon on the Gospell the third Sonday in Aduent which is in his Sermons pag 258. hath likewise registred it That there was neuer none that belieued in Christ which was lost but all beleiuers were saued therefore saith hee it is not to be doubted but that if wee will beleiue wee shall be saued too Master Greenham that worthy and experimentall Saint of of God in the 2 part of his workes cap 32 sect 5 6. in his readings on Psal 119. ver 116. and in other places of his works hath deliuered this our present assertion as a sound orthodox and experimentall truth So hath Master Deering in his 27. Lecture on the Hebrewes But if these men seeme vile and little in your eyes behold some greater men then these are here to giue testimonie to vs and our assertion and that vpon record Mathew late Arch-B of Yorke in his Commentary of Election Praedestination reprobation Edwin Arch-B of Yorke in his Sermon vpon Luke 1 v 74 75. sect 14. Dr. Babington Bb. of Worcester on the 12 Artic of the Creede life euerlasting In his exposition on the Lords prayer the sourth vse from the word Father and on the sixth petition Lead vs not into temptatien but deliuer vs from euill Learned Doctor Robert Abbot Bishop of Salisbury and regious professor of Diuinitie in the Vniuersitie of Oxford in his Lecture De perseuerantia sanctorum read publikely in the Diuinitie schooles at Oxford in the Act time Iulie 10. 1613. In his Animaduersions vpon Thompsons Diatriba and in his answere to Bishop part 1. cap 12. part 2. cap 3. Ready and learned Doctor Fulke in his answere to the Rhemist Testament on Rom 8. 16. 39. Incomparable Hooker in his discourse of Iustification and in his Sermon of the certaintie perpetuitie of faith in the elect Profound Doctor Field in his first booke de Ecclesia cap 3 17 in his pathway to the Church Digress 42. Profound iudicious and famous Doctor Reinolds once regious Professor of Diuinitie in the Vniuersitie of Oxford a man of incomparable learning and of as godly humble and religious a conuersation whom yet Master Mountague how justly let all men judge stiles a Puritan one of the Tribe a petitioner against the doctrine discipline of the Church of England and a man onely excellent for his reading in his 6 Theses Thes 4. sect 23 24. in his Apollog Thesium sect 17 20. and Conference at Hampton Court pag 24. Learned Doctor Whitakers regious Professor of Diuinitie in the Vniuersitie of Cambridge whom Master Mountague sticks not for to stile an earnest promoter of nouell opinions in his Respons ad 8 Rationes Campiani De paradoxis lib 8. and in other of his workes Learned Doctor Ouer all Deane of Pauls and afterwards Bishop of Norwich whose memory by Mr. Mountagues owne confession shall euer be pretious with all good and learned men Conference at Hampton Court pag 41 42 43. Profound orthodox and solid Mr. Perkins in his booke of Praedestination and Grace in his Commentary on Iude 1 24. and other of his workes Learned Mr. Nowell Deane of Pauls in his Catechisme Reuerend Mr. Phillipps in his Sermons on Rom 8. ver 15 16. Godly Mr. Hireon in his Sermons pag 102 119 205 365. Mr. Rogers Chaplaine to Arch-bishop Bancroft in his Analysis vpon the 17 Article Proposition third Laborious and learned Doctor Willet in his Synopsis pag 63 64. 548 546. 923 924 925. in his Commentarie on Rom 5 Contr 3 on cap 6. Contr 7 on cap 8. Contr 19 21. on cap 9. Contr 16 on cap 11 Contr 19 21. Mr. Wilcocks on Psal 125 1 2 and on Rom 8. Godly painfull and learned Mr. Byfield in his discourse of the promises cap 13. Mr. Elton in sundry places of his Sermons on Rom 8. Learned and laborious Mr. Fox in his Martyriolege Printed at London 1610 pag 1506. and in diuers other places Mr. Iohn Downham in his Snmme of Diuinity lib 2. cap 7. Mr. Culuerwell in his Treatise of faith the 6 generall head pag 489 to 506 to whom I may adde Learned King IAMES of blessed memorie in his Declaration against Vorstius all
I know not any particular man sure I am that they are neither the best nor greatest nor yet the learnedest in our Church and therefore vnlesse that Mr. Mountague will arrogate and monopolize this title of the learnedest in the Church of England vnto himselfe alone which hee is very like to doe because he doth debase the chiefest worthies of our Church with such vile scandalous reproachfull and vnderualuing termes and checke correct reiect and vse them at his pleasure though alas good man hee is not worthy for to be their scholler hee must pardon vs though we beleeue him not in this That the learnedest in the Church of England haue alwayes held that faith once had may bee both totally and finally lost for you see that I haue proued it to be a meere forgery and vntruth that was neuer published and recorded by any member of the Church of England but himselfe But now Mr. Mountagne tells vs that they were the learnedest in the Church of England that drew composed and agreed the Articles in 52. and 62. that ratified them in 71. that confirmed them againe in 640. Well what if this be granted though perchance there might be some question of it All these saith hee haue and doe assent vnto Antiquity in this Tenent and subscribe it truly or in hypocrisie Well I grant it for all Antiquity as I haue formerly proued hath concurred with me in this assertion Yea but Mr. Mountague saith otherwise and therefore I must take his meaning not his words to wit that the learnedest in the Church of England haue agreed ratified and confirmed it that Faith once had may be both totally and finally lost But how doth this appeare O saith hee obsegnatis tabulis by the expresse words of the 16. Article so that now the second and the maine thing which I haue to proue is only this That the Articles of the Church of England but specially the 16. Article doe not proue Mr. Mountagues assertion of a totall and finall fall from gracâ—… This will euidently appeare first by the very title of the 16. Article which is only this of sinne after Baptisme The Title doubtlesse of euery Article compriseth the very pith scope and substance of the Article as well as the title of our Homilies doth of the Homilies else they were very injudicious and not the learnedest in the Church of England who imposed it and you an injudicious and shallow-pated scholler to draw arguments from titles as you haue done from the Title of an Homily if therefore this title and the 16. Article suite together the 16. Article must needs bee only intended of sinne after Baptisme and not of a totall or finall fall from grace Secondy as the title of the Article so the very words the very scope and end of the Article proue as much For the very scope and end of the 16. Article as any man that hath his eyes in his head may discerne at first was but to condemne two sorts of Heretickes First such as hold that after men are once regenerated they cannot sin as the Nouatians Iouinians and Catharists did and as some Brownists doe hauing reference to the 15. Article going immediatly before which concludes that all men besides Christ though regenerate were sinners Now this appeares by the conclusion of the 16. Article therefore they are to bee condemned which say they can no more sinne as long as they liue here Secondly to condemne such as denie place of forgiuenesse and reconciliation to such as commit any grosse and scandalous sinne after Baptisme though they are truly penitent for the same as the Montanists and Nouatians did in the primatiue Church and as some Anabaptists and Brownists doe now which appeares by the conclusion of the Article from the former praemises Therefore they are to be condemned which say they can no more sinne as long as they liue here or deny place of forgiuenesse to such as truly repent This then being the only substance end scope of our 16. Article to condemne these two sorts of heretickes there is nothing as yet to bee found in it which makes either for a totall or a finall fall from grace If then there be any thing in this Article making for it then it must needs be these bare words of the Article abstracted and wrested from their genuine and proper scope and sense After we haue receiued the holy Ghost wee may depart from grace giuen and fall into sinne and by the grace of God wee may rise againe and amend our liues But these words torment and racke them to the vtmost they warrant not this Doctrine of a totall or finall fall from grace at least they warrant it not in that declaratory and positiue manner and in plaine and expresse words as Mr. Mountague affirmes they doe For first here is not so much as one word of falling either totally or finally from the state of grace and justification into the state of death and damnation not so much as one word that faith once had may either totally or finally bee lost againe Now they are your owâ—… words Mr. Mountague the words are not direct which are not expresse so say I that is not the plaine positiue declaratorie and expresse Doctrine of the Articles which is not deliuered in positiue plaine absolute and expresse tearmes this Doctrine of a totall and finall fall from grace is not so deliuered in these words in this 16. Article therefore it is but your bare and wrested collection and not the expresse doctrine of the Article Secondly the very words themselues will not beare that doctrine which you would thrust vpon them in any good grammaticall construction For what good Grammarian is there that would giue this construction to these words After wee haue receiued the holy Ghost we may depart from grace giuen and fall into sinne that is wee may fall quite away from the state of grace into the state of damnation as if that euery departure from grace and euery fall into sinne were a falling totally from the state of grace Euery man I hope will grant that the committing of any sinne is a departure from grace in respect of that particular sinne be it but a sinne of infirmity he that commits the least sinne departs from grace and falls into sinne and yet hee doth not presently fall from the state of grace into the state of damnation A man may depart from the act of grace aud yet retaine the habit still a man may fall into finne and yet not fall from the state of grace into the state of damnation hee may recedere depart as our Article affirmes and yet not excedere fall quite away from grace giuen so that the very words will not necessarily no nor impliedly beare that sense the which you giue them because a man may depart from grace giuen and fall into sinne and yet not fall either totally or finally from the state of grace Secondly
such men which are regenerated ingrafted into Christ in outward shew but not in truth which are not within the verge and compasse of our question and not of such as were in truth regenerated and inserted into Christ. Or else if they are intended of true regenerate men they will not reach so farre as to proue that euer these did either finally or totally fall from grace notwithstanding all their wrestings and collections because the expresse words of the Scripture say the contrary and so they come not home vnto the point in question But all such as fall away from grace are onely such as neuer had any true and sauing grace and such as were neuer truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ. Therefore all those Scriptures and examples which our Antagonists produce against vs make nothing to the purpose These two generall assertions which are able for to satisfie and cleare all future obiections being thus praemised I come now to giue a particular answere to all those particular arguments which may bee obiected against mee either from Scripture or from reason The first argument which may bee obiected against this conclusion is drawen from Ezech 18 24 26. and Ezech 33 12 13 18. where the words are these If the righteous turneth away from this righteousnesse and committeth iniquitie and doth according to all the abominations that the wicked man doth shall he liue all his righteousnesse that he hath done shall not be mentioned in his trespasse that he hath trespassed and in his sinne that he hath sinned in them shall hee dye When I say to the righteous that he shall surely liue if hee trust to his owne righteousnesse and commit iniquity all his righteousnesse shall not bee remembred but for his iniquity that hee hath committed hee shall dye for it From which texts of Scripture this argument is framed Righteous men may turne away from their righteousnesse and commit iniquitie and doe ac̄cording to all the abominations that the wicked doe and they may dye in their sinnes as appeares by this text Therefore they may fall finally or totally from grace I answere that the Antecedent is false and is not warranted by the place that is alleaged For first of all the righteous man which the Prophet speakes of in these places is not such a one as is justified by the righteousnesse of Iesus Christ being ingrasted into him by faith but such a one which is justified meerely by his owne righteousnesse as your Popish merit mongers seeke to be which is euident by the expresse words of the text For these words If he trust to his owne righteousnesse if hee turne away from his righteousnesse all his righteousnesse that hee hath done shall not bee remembred the righteousnesse of the righteous shall not deliuer him in the day of his transgression neither shall hee bee able to liue for his righteousnesse in the day that he sinneth proue that the Prophet speakes onely of Legall and not of Euangelicall righteousnesse and his words are in effect no more but this Hee that seekes to be justified by his owne righteousnesse or by the workes of the law if he commit but one sinne in all his life this doth disanull his legall justification and makes him liable to eternall death For whosoeuer shall keepe the whole Law and yet offend in one point he is guilty of all Iam. 2. 10. and cursed is he that continueth not in all the words of this Law to do them Deut. 27 26. So that all the argument which this text affords you is but this Hee that seekes to bee justified by the Law and by his owne righteousnesse if he commits but one sinne doth loose his justification and make himselfe liable to damnation Therefore regenerate men who are justified onely by faith in Christ may fall from the state of grace how well this argument followes and how well it makes for your purpose let all men judge Now for farther proofe that this righteous man and this righteousnesse here mentioned is onely meant of such a man that is legally righteous and of legall righteousnesse I shall manifest it to bee so by these three reasons The first is taken from Ezech 18 4 20. where the words are the soule that sinneth it shall dye this is true onely in respect of the strictnesse of the Law but not in respect of the clemencie of the Gospell for then none should be saued therefore the righteousnesse here intended must onely bee a legall and not an euangelicall righteousnesse for in the Gospell and in respect of euangelicall righteousnesse the soule that sinneth may not dye The second reason is taken from Ezech 18. ver 5. to 9. ver 14 to 18. wherethe words are these If a man be iust and doe that which is lawfull and right and hath not eaten vpon the mountaines c. hath walked in my statutes and kept my iudgements to deale truly hee is iust he shall surely liue saith the Lord God which words cannot bee intended of the righteousnesse of faith which is wrought by Christ alone but onely of the righteousnesse of workes which is wrought by men themselues wherefore this righteousnesse here mentioned is onely a legall and not an euangelicall righteousnesse Thirdly the Scriptures say expresly that a true regenerate man who is justified by faith in Christ can neuer sinne vnto death because he is borne of God and his seede remaineth in him 1 Iohn 3 9. that he keepeth himselfe and that wicked one toucheth him not 1 Iohn 5 18. that hee shall be had in euerlasting remembrance Psa 112◅6 and that hee shall neuer perish nor yet dye the death Iohn 10 28. cap 11 25 26. And therefore this righteous man here mentioned which may sinne vnto death which may bee quite forgotten and not remembred and which may dye and perish in his sinnes must needes bee one that is legally righteous or righteous onely in the eyes of men and not such a one as is regenerated and justified by Iesus Christ and so this place of Scripture makes nothing for your purpose Secondly admit that this place were meant of a true regenerate man and such a one as is justified by faith yet it proues not any thing at all against me for two reasons First because the whole scope and meaning of the place is not to proue the Apostacie of the Saints but onely for to cleare Gods justice and that in these two particulars First that he will neuer punish any man for the sinens of other men of which they are not guilty that he will neuer punish a righteous son for the sins of a wicked father the soule that sinneth it shall dye no other the sonne shall not beare the iniquity of the father neither shall the father beare the iniquity of the sonne the righteousnesse of the righteous shall be upon him and the wickednesse of the wicked shall be vpon him Ezech 18 4 20. This is the maine scope of
out of â—…is or bis Fathers hands Iohn 10. 28. that Nothing shall euer separate them from that loue of God which is in Christ Iesus theâ—… Lord. Rom. 8. 39. and therefore they need not feare this breaking off from Christ so that this place must bee applied to the whole visible Church of the Gentiles and not to the Elect faithfull and particular Saints of God within the Church Secondly I answer That this is spoken only by way of counsell and aduice to admonish the Gentiles how they should carry themselues towards the Iewes that they should not therefore contemne the Iewes and 〈◊〉 ouer them because that God had cast off the Iewes and had chosen them to be his people in their roome but that they should carry themselues louingly and humbly towardâ—… them because they were once the people of God and might be so againe for ought they knew and God might as well cast off them if they grow insolent and sinne against them and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Iewes againe inâ—…o his fauour as hee did cast off the Iewes to receiue them What then makes this to your purpose God may reject the Gentiles and receiue the Iewes therefore the true regenerate Saints and members of Iesus Christ may fall from grace is no good consequent 〈◊〉 I answer with Anselme in his Exposition vpon this chapter that this place here is but a friendly admonition and a godly exhortation not to a seruile but to a 〈◊〉 feare which is the chiefest meanes to keepe vs close to God and to restraine and awe vs so thâ—…t wee shall not dâ—…part froâ—…â—…im Ier. 32. 40. therefore this being but an exhortation vnto such a grace as is one of the chiefest meanes to keepe vs from falling from the state of Grace cannot implie a fall from grace as you pretend it doth Lastly I answer that the Saints of God they are humble meeke and lowly men they are not high-minded nor haughtiâ—… hearted and they alwayes stand in awe of God Psal. 131. 1. 2. Psal. 39. 2. Isai. 61. 1. Math. 5. 3. 5. cap. 11. 29. Gal. 5. 22 23. and Col. 3. 12. therefore they need not feare to be dissected or broken off from Christ for pride and arrogance and so they are not within the compasse of this admonition and aduice of Paul at least not within the compasse of the punishment of that sinne which Paul doth here dehort the Gentiles from All these admonitions and cautions therefore which you here obiect make nothing at all against me they serue only in maiorem cautelam to make the Saints more wary not lesse firme and stable in the state of grace The ninth objection which may bee framed against mee is that of the 1 Cor. 16. 13. Watch you and stand fast in the faith quitte you like men bee strong That of Phil. 4. 1. stand fast in the Lord. That of Heb. 4. 14. Hold fast your profession That of Reâ—… 2. 25 46. Hold fast till I come and the like These exhortations intimate that the Saints may fall from grace else they were but idle I answer that you are much deceiued For the end of these and such like exhortations is but currenti calcar to put spurres to a running horse to incite incourage and stirre vp the Saints of God to greater stedfastnesse and immobilitie in faith to roote settle and ground them more firmely in the state of grace and to helpe them on in their constant and finall perseuerance this is their maine and only end that men may bee more resolute firme and stable then they were before and therefore they doe not necessarily intimate or implie that the true regenerate Saints of God may fall from the state of grace This I shall euidence and make plaine by some few familiar examples A Captaine who hath a regiment of resolute and valiant Souldiers who will rather die then turnâ—… their backes and flie being to incounter with an enemie speakes thus vnto them Sirs now you must stand close vnto it or else you are vndone wherefore plucke vp your spirits and your courage shew your valour maintaine your credit and your honour and rather sacrifice your liues vnto the enemies sword then staine your honour by a dangerous flight Doe these words of exhortation and incouragement necessarily imply that the Souldiers would trust their heeles before their hands and turne their backes vnto their enemies because they are thus incouraged and exhorted for to fight should these Soulders take these words as a disparagement and blemish to their valour nothing lesse for they are words of incouragement only not of diffidence and distrust A man that cannot swimme is fallen into a deepe swift and broad riuer so that he is in danger to be drowned one that is standing by perceiuing this his danger casteth a rope vnto him for to pull him ouâ—… of which when he hath taken hold hee then doth vse these words vnto him hold fast the rope and be sure not to let it goe or else you will be drowned doe these words of his implie that the other will let goe the rope and not hold it fast no hee is in danger of his life and therefore he will bee sure for to keepe his hold though the other had neuer vsed these words unto him So it is here the eternall life and welfare of the Saints of God depends vpon their spirituall prowesse vpon their holding fast of Christ if they should turne their backes to Sathan and flie before him if they should let goe their hold of Christ they were vtterly vndone for euer and their soules should perish Wherefore these and such like exhortations doe not necessarily implie that the Saints of God may fall away from the state of Grace and therefore they come not to the present purpose Secondly I answer that these exhortations make wholly for mee for they doe all implie that the Saints of God doe stand fast and perseuere continually in grace or at least that they may doe so and that they may come to such a stability and firmenesse in grace that they cannot fall away or be remoued and therefore these exhortations are wholly against you The tenth objection that may bee made against me are these conditionall texts of Scripture following Iohn 8. 31. 51. If you continue in my words then are you my disciples indeed If a man keepe my sayings hee shall neuer see death 1 Cor. 15. 2. By which word you are saued if you kâ—…epe in memorie what I preached vnto you 1 Chron. 28. 9. If thou seeke him hee will be found of thee but if thou forsake him bee will cast thee off for ouer Gal. 6. 9. In due time you shall reape if you faint not Col. 1. 21 22 23. You that were sometimes alienated and enemies by your wiâ—…ked workes yet now hath hee reconciled in the body of his flesh through death to present you holy vnblamable and irrepròuable in his sight if you continue in the faith
and not sanctifie their prosperitie or pouertie vnto them but God doth neuer leaue regenerate men vnto themselues he doth neuer leaue them nor forsake them and hee doth sanctifie all estates and conditions of life vnto them making them all to worke together for their good Rom. 8. 38. therefore they cannot cause them for to fall from grace Secondly I answer that these words of Agur doe not proue that plentie or pouertie may cause regenerate men to fall from the state of grace they only proue that they may cause them to commit many sinnes against God which they may doe and yet not fall from grace Hezechiah his heart was lifted vp with pride 2 Chron. 32. 25 26. yet hee fell not away from the state of grace but repented him of this his sinne Plentie or pouertie they may be occasions of pride and discontent thus much this prayer of Agur proues it proues that Christians ought for to desire a competencie and to auoide and pray against all occasions of sinne and this is all it proues What consequence then can you inferre from hence What that the true regenerate Saints of God may fall from grace because that Agur prayes to God to keepe him from the occasions of sinne because he prayes to God to giue him perseuerance and to remoue those lets and obstacles which might hinder him in his perseuerance What an absurdity would this be Regenerate men pray to God to keepe them from the occasions of sinne regenerate men vse the meanes and helpes to perseuere in grace and remoue the obstacles that might hinder them therefore they may fall from grace This is all the argument that can bee collected from hence and this all is nothing The twentieth Argument that may bee obiected against me is taken from that of Paul 1 Thes. 5. 19. Quench not the spirit The regenerate Saints of God may quench the Spirit of God therefore they may fall from grace I answer that there is a double quenching of the Spirit the one of the heate feruencie the other of the habituall graces of Gods spirit the Saints of God out of idlenesse and negligence in Gods seruice or by the commission of some sinne or other or by the negligent and superficiall performance of holy duties may quench the feruencie the heate and zeale of Gods Spirit that is of those spirituall graces which are within them which are no more but the degrees and fruites of grace but yet they can neuer extinguish the habituall graces of Gods spirit for they are of a diuine nature they are an incorruptible seed a seed which will remaine within them a spirituall fire which neuer failes and which many waters cannot quench as you may reade in the 1 Pet 1. 23. 2 Pet. 1. 3. 1 Iohn 3. 9. Luke 22 32. 1 Cor. 13. 8. and Cant. 8. 6 7. So that the meaning of the Apostle in this place is onely this that the Saints of God must not neglect the sweet and comfortable motions of Gods Spirit when as they feele them arising and springing vp in their hearts that they must beware of abating of the edge the feruencie the strength the heate and zeale of their graces and not that they may vtterly extinguish and put out the habituall graces of Gods spirit which are in them So that your Argument from this place of Paul can be but this The Saints of God may suppresse and neglect the sweet and comfortable motions of Gods spirit and lose the heate the zeale the feruencie and degrees of grace therefore they may lose the very habits and seeds of grace which is but a meere inconsequencie Secondly I answer that there is a double quenching of the Spirit first in respect of our selues secondly in respect of the Spirit it selfe The Saints of God may doe as much as in them lies to quench the Spirit of God but yet they cannot actually quench the Spirit the Spirit of God will not be quenched by them but will still remaine within them though they themselues out of incogitancie or negligence but neuer out of malice and wilfulnesse indeauour for to quench it Thirdly I answer that this quenching of the Spirit of God may haue a double construction For a man may quench the motions of Gods spirit either in respect of himselfe or in respect of others Now some good interpreters expound this place of Paul of the quenching of Gods spirit meerely in respect of others making this to bee the meaning of the place See that you incourage the Ministers of the Gospell and not crosse interrupt or discourage them in their preaching by your vnfruitfulnesse or by opposing your selues against them or by your disreport and neglect of their ministry in not repairing to their Sermons joyning it with the insuing verse Despise not prophecie If you â—…ake the place in this sense as well you may your Argument can bee no other then this The Saints of God may discourage and offend their Ministers therefore they may fall from the state of grace which is a meere Nonsequitur Lastly I answer that this place of Paul is but a bare admonition hee saith not that the Saints of God doe quench the spirit but onely admonish them not to quench it Which doth not implie that the Saints of God may quench the spirit because their diligent care in not quenching of the Spirit is the chiefest means for to preserue keep the Spirit in them The Saints of God must vse the meanes for to preserue the spirit in them therefore they may quite extinguish it is but an absurd and contradictorâ—…e Argument So that take this place of Paul in what sense you will it doth not make against me The twentie one objection is that of the 2 Iohâ—… 8. Looke to your selues that wee lose not those things which wee â—…aue wrought but that wee may receiue a full reward Regenerate men may lose the things which they haue wrought therefore they may fall from grace I answer that the Antecedent is not warranted or proued by this place first because these words are but a meere caution and exhortations to the Saints to beware lest Antichrist should seduce them therefore this being but a meere exhortation to vse the means to perseuere in grace doth not nor cannot necessarily implie that the saints of God may fall from grace Secondly those to whom St. Iohn doth vse this exhortation they were the elect saints of God verse 1. the truth did dwell with them and shall be with them for euer vers 2. they were such as should abide in the doctrine of Christ verse 9. therefore this exhortation and caution made to such as these doth not necessarily implie that they may be seduced fall from grace For it is impossible for the elect of God to bee seduced Math. 24. 24. Marke 13. 22. Reu. 9. 4. cap. 17. 8. it is impossible for them in whom the truth doth dwell and should abide for euer for them
beene lately pressed and propounded in another manner I will propound it in the same manner as it was then vrged and so will answere it A true regenerate man and a member of Iesus Christ may lie long in a grosse and knowne finne without any actuall repentance as Dauid and Salomon did therefore hee may fall totally if not finally from the state of grace The argument they proue to bee true by this reason The true regenerate Saints of God committing any grosse and knowne sins and lying in them without repentance from the time of these sinnes committed to the time of their actuall repentance of them are not in the state of grace but in the state of damnation which they proue by these two reasons First because these sinnes are mortall in themselues and exclude men quite from heauen as appeares by Ezech. 18. 20. the soule that sinneth it shall dye and by the 1 Cor. 6. 9 10. those that commit â—…nch things and sinnes as these shall not inherit the kingdome of God Secondly because these sinnes of theirs are not forgiuen before their actuall repentance of them so that if they should die before their actuall repentance of them they should be damned for them so that in that Interim and space of time betweene the sinne committed and their actuall repentance they are in the state of damnation and not in the state of grace because their sinnes are not forgiuen and therefore the Argument followes For answer to this maine Objection which is the very summe and substance of all that can be objected and the very basis and foundation of our Antagonists Error I shall denie the ground and reasons which support this argument First I shall denie that the Saints of God committing any grosse and knowne sinne and lying in it for a time without any actuall repentance are during the space and time of this their impenitencie in the state of damnation And secondly I shall denie that a particular repentance is absolutely necessarie to saluation after euery particular grosse and knowne acte of sinne which the Saints of God commit and that those sinnes of theirs cannot bee pardoned before their actuall and particular repentance For the first of these it will be plaine and manifest if wee consider how farre those men must goe that will sinne vnto death or sinne so farre as to put themselues into the state of damnation He that will sinne vnto death or sinne so farre as to put himselfe into the state of damnation must sinne so farre as vtterly to separate and cut off himselfe from Christ vtterly to extirpate all the seeds and habits of true and sauing grace which are within him and wholly to emancipate and inthrall himselfe to the seruice of sinne and Sathan For as long as any man abides in Christ and is not seuered or cut off from him as long as any man hath any habits and seeds of true and sauing grace within him and is not wholly inthralled and imbondaged vnto sinne and Sathan so that the whole intire wrath of God cannot light and fall vpon him he is not in the state of damnation but in the state of grace Now none of the true regenerate saints of God can sin so far as vtterly to seuer cut off themselues from Christ or vtterly to roote out the very habit and seed of those true and sauing graces that are within them and to inthrall themselues wholly to the seruice of sinne and Sathan so that the whole intire wrath of God cannot arise against them therefore they can neuer sinne so faire as to put themselues into the state of death and damnation This is euident by diuers pregnant places of Scripture and by diuers reasons First it is euident that a true regenerate Saint of God can neuer sinne so farre as to put himselfe into the state of death and damnation no not for a time because he can neuer sinne so farre as to bee vtterly cast downe from the state of grace to be vtterly cut off from Christ and to be vtterly depriued of the life of grace Dauid he informes vs that a good man though hee fall yet he shall not be vtterly cast downe for the Lord vpholdeth him with his hand and Paul he assures vs that hee shall be holden vp for God is able to make him stand The Saints of God they may be troubled on euery side by reason of sinne but yet not distressed they may be cast downe by sinne but not destroyed they may be as dying men and yet behold they liue as chastened yet not killed as sorrowfull yet alwayes reioycing as poore yet making many rich as hauing nothing and yet possessing all things they may be like the man that went downe from Ierusalem to Ierico and fell among theeues euen wounded and halfe dead with sinne their graces like those of the Church of Sardis may be ready to die the Saints of God and their graces they may suffer a winter of temptation they may bee sicke and languishing by reason of sinne they may bee semianimes as Cyprian stiles them halfe dead and halfe withered but yet they are neuer wholly dead in sinnes and trespasses when they are at the worst and lowest ebbe they are but bruised reedes and smoaking flaxe they are neuer vtterly broken neuer vtterly quenched and put out there are still some breathings of grace and spirituall life within their soules there are graces alwayes mixed with their sinnes there are still some good things in them of which God takes speciall notice there is still a little strength within them wherby they are inabled to recouer themselues againe to keepe the word of God and not to denie his name and therefore by the voyce and testimonie of all these Scriptures the true regenerate Saints of God doe neuer sinne so farre as to put themselues into the state of death and damnation because they neuer sinne so farre as to be vtterly cast downe from the state of grace to be vtterly cut off from Christ or to be wholly depriued of the life of grace Secondly the Saints of God when as they fall into any sinnes they neuer goe so farre as to put themselues into the state of death and damnation by these their sinnes because the seed of grace doth still abide within them this is St. Iohns reason in the 1 Iohn 3. 9. and cap. 5. 16 17 18. Hee that is borne of God doth not commit sinne for his seed remaineth in him neither can hee sinne that is hee cannot sinne vnto death because he is borne of God The seed of grace it is an immortall seed 1 Pet. 2. 23. it is a diuine nature 2 Pet. 1. 4. it will quench all the fiery darts of the wicked Ephes. 6. 16. and it cannot bee quenched or drowned Cant. 8. 7. it is an annointing that abideth in men 1 Iohn 2. 27. it is such a seed as can die no
grace and inward not according to their sins and outward man and therefore God taking them away in the very act not in the habit and the trade of sin he will estimate and reward them according to their graces and their inward man according to the inward purpose bent and clination of their soules according to the constant course and practise of their liues and not according to that particular and priuate act of sinne in which they dye so that they doe not perish euerlastingly for this act of sinne but they are certainly receiued vnto life euerlasting Sixthly the theefe which neuer did repent in all his life before was saued on the Crosse euen at the last gaspe and period of his life therefore that God and Sauiour who was so mercifull to saue a sinner that neuer was a Saint at the very last gaspe will alwaies be so gratious so louing and compassionate as to saue a sinner at the last which was a Saint a friend a brother and a best beloued vnto him before Lastly to shut vp all in a word or two Admit that an actuall and particular repentance were required as a thing absolutely necessary to saluation of all the true regenerate Saints of God after any grosse and knowne sinne committed by them yet then I say that when God doth take away any of his Saints in the very act of sinne hee doth in that very instance which hee takes them in giue them such an actuall particular repentance as shall saue their soules for hee hath praedestinated them vnto euerlasting life and therefore hauing predestinated them vnto the end he doth likewise predestinate them vnto the meanes for to obtaine it Wherefore as it is altogether impossible for to depriue them of the end so likewise is it impossible to depriue them of the meanes which are annexed inseparably vnto it and therfore put the worst you can imagine yet we may safely say that God doth alwayes giue his Saints this actuall repentance euen in the very point and instant when he cuts them off which the Pseudolut herans and those that defend only a totall fall from grace without a finall doe confesse and teach And therefore notwithstanding all those sinnes they doe commit notwithstanding their lying in sinne for a time or their dying in sin I meane in the act not in the habit and trade of some particular sin without any actuall or particular repentance for that sinne of theirs they neither fall finally nor yet totally from the state of grace This is the maine and principall argument this is the very knot and hinge of the question and therefore pardon me good Reader though I haue beene so prolix and tedious in my answer to it The twentie fiue Argument or obiection that is made against me is That a true regenerate Saint of God may bee excommunicated therefore he may fall from grace I answer that the Argument doth not follow For though excommunication may seuer a Saint of God from the societie of the faithfull and the visible Church of God for a time to humble him for his sinne and to make him more circumspect in his carriage for the time to come yet it neuer doth dissect or cut him off from Christ nay it doth not wholly seuer and cut him off from being a member of the visible Church for then he ought not to be assayled or admitted into the visible Church againe vnlesse he were rebaptized and during the time of this his excommunication he should be no better and no more a Christian than a Turke or Heathen man neither of which can be admitted and therefore this excommunication if you take it in the true and primatiue vse of it not as it is now commonly abused and made a common proces vpon pettie and trifling occasions it only suspends men from being partakers of the priuiledges of the Church it neuer cuts them off from being members of it This is the opinion of Mr. Hooker in his third booke of Ecclesiasticall policie cap. 1. pag. 88. of Bishop Abbot in his answer to Mr Thompsons Diatriba cap. 16. of Mr. Caluin in the 14. booke of his Institutions cap. 12. section 9. 10. of Marlorat in his Exposition vpon the 1 Cor. 5. 5. And I know not any Diuines either Moderne or Ancient of any note or credite that doe affirme the contrarie and therefore your Argument followes not The twenty sixe Argument which may bee made against me is this All Infants which are baptized they are by this their baptisme truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ and yet we see that many of them doe afterwards fall totally and finally from grace Therefore those who are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ by a true and liuely faith may fall from grace The Argument is taken for granted and therefore the Antecedent is only to be proued This our Antagonists indeuour for to doe by Scripture and by the authoritie and Doctrine of our Church of England The maine place of Scripture which is alledged is that of Gal. 3. 27. As many of you as haue beene baptized into Christ haue put on Christ which they say is full in point And that this is also the Doctrine of the Church of England is proued by the forme of baptisme recorded in our Common prayer Booke where the Minister before baptisme reciting how Christ did blesse the little children that were brought vnto them and rebuke his Disciples for hindering such as would bring them to him doth from hence exhort the people in these insuing words Doubt not therefore but earnestly beleeue that hee will likewise fauourably receiue these present Infants that he will imbrace them with the armes of his mercie that hee will giue vnto them the blessing of eternall life and make them partakers of his euerlasting kingdome And againe when as the childe is baptized there is this forme of thanks-giuing there prescribed to vs. Wee yeeld thee hearty thankes most mercifull Father that it hath pleased thee to regenerate this Infant with thy holy Spirit to receiue him for thine owne childe by adoption and to incorporate him into thy holy congregation Which words doe fully proue that all such Infants as are baptized are truly regenerated and so the Antecedent is fully proued to bee true Because this is an argument in which our Antagonists doe much triumph and boast as if wee were not able to vndergoe the charge and vigor of it I shall indeauour to giue a full and satisfactorie answer to it in which I shall bee forced to bee somewhat large and tedious in respect of those many particulars which I am to giue an answer to I will reduce them vnto these foure heads First I shall denie that all Infants that are baptized are truly regenerated and inwardly ingrafted into Christ by vertue of their baptisme Secondly I shall affirme that the place of the Galathians proues it not nor yet any other têxt of Scripture Thirdly I shall
But admit that this were the receiued opinion and doctrine of the Church of England that all infants are by their very baptisme truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ then Mr. Mountague you are in this Dilemma then you must grant this to be the doctrine of the Church of England that those who are truly regenerated may both totally and finally fall from grace which I haue proued to be false or else you must of necessitie grant that none who are baptized fall from grace which is contrary to your owne assertion or else you must needes grant that all such as are baptized are not regenerate which is contrary to that for which you do so much contend so that turne which way you will you are but in a maze and labyrinth and fettred in the gines of your owne argument Againe I would but demand this question of Maister Mountague whether this be an article of his Creedâ—… that all infants that are baptized are truly regenerated by the holy Ghost that they are partakers of eternall life and of Christs euerlasting kingdome as you say our Common prayer booke affirmes If you beleiue it not why then doe you presse it vpon vs or why do you not beleiue that which you say our Church beleiues If you beleiue it how then can your doctrine of a totall and finall fall from grace stand together with it if you beleiue that all infants that are baptized shall haue euerlasting life and be made partakers of Christs kingdome you must of necessity beleeue that they shall perseuere in grace vnto the end hee that beleeues that the end shall certainly be obtained must as certainly beleeue that the meanes which must obtaine this end shall be vsed to and therefore if you beleeue that all infants that are baptized shall haue euerlasting life and injoy Christ kingdome you must likewise beleeue that they shall perseuere and neuer fall from grace If you say that you do not absolutly beleeue that they shall haue euerlasting life and bee made partakers of Christs kingdome but only conditionally if they perseuere in the grace receiued in their baptisme I answer that if you doe absolutely beleeue that they are regenerated why doe you not as absolutely beleeue that they shall haue euerlasting life and be made partakers of Christs kingdome they are both recorded in the same tearmes they are knit together in one sentence one following vpon the necke of another they are both set downe as absolutely and positiuely as the other therefore you must beleeue all of them to be alike absolute and then you cannot beleeue that euer they should fall from grace for then they could not be made partakers of Christs kingdome and of euerlasting life or else you must make them all conditionall and beleeue that those infants which are baptized are regenerated if they perseuere in grace else that they are not regenerated by their baptisme which would falsifie this your proposition that all infants are truly regenerated by their baptisme which proposition as you see is no waies warranted by the Common prayer Booke or by the Church of England Lastly admit that all infants that are baptized are regenerated and that this were warranted by Gal. 3. 27. and by the doctrine of the Church of England vet I say that this argument followes not nor is not to the purpose for the question is not whether infants other men may fall totally or finally from that sacramentall grace which they receiue inbaptisme but whether vere fideles whether such as are truly regenerated ingrafted truly into Christ by a liuely faith may fall totally or finally from the state of grace of the state or iustifying faith Now sacramentall grace and regeneration is one thing and this state of true sauing grace and of justification by faith is another if we admit that infants once baptized haue a sacramentall grace within them which is nothing else but a freedome from the guilt of originall sinne yet no man I thinke can be so absurd as to say that they haue any habituall graces or any liuing and justifying faith within them for they want reason and vnderstanding to apply the word and promises of God and to vse these meanes which should beget these graces in them And therefore seeing that the grace which children and others receiue from baptisme is but sacramentall far different from the grace of which our controuersie and question is if wee grant the whole argument to be true yet it is nothing to the purpose And so much in answer to this twenty sixth argument in which I haue beene ouer tedious by reason that our Antagonists rely so much vpon it The twenty seuenth argument which may be objected against mee is from particular examples which may be reduced to three heads The first of Adam and the Angells the second of particular and whole Churches the third of particular and priuate Saints The first argument from Examples is drawne from Adam and the Angells Adam and the Angells who were of an higher alloy then any regenerate Saints of God now are they fell from the state of grace the one totally the other finally Therefore the true regenerate Saints of God whose grace are inferiour vnto theirs may fall totally and finally from grace as well as they I answer that the Argument followes not because there is a great difference betweene the graces which the regenerate Saints of God injoy and that grace which Adam and the Angels had For first that grace which Adam and the Angels had it was in their owne possession and custodie they themselues were the gardians and keepers of it But that grace which the regenerate Saints of God doe now injoy it is not in their owne keeping they themselues are not the gardians and preseruers of it but it is God himselfe who keepes it and preserues it in them by his power This is euident by the 2 Tim. 1. 14. That good thing that was committed to thee keepe by the holy Ghost which dwelleth in vs the holy Ghost himselfe who begins doth likewise gard and keepe the graces of the Saints So in the 1 Pet. 1. 5. who are kept by the power of God through faith vnto saluation the power of God it doth not onely keepe the Saints vnto saluation but it preserues and keepes their faith to So in the 1 Tim. 1. 12. I know-whom I haue beleeued and I am perswaded that he is able to keepe that which I haue committed to him against that day The faith of the Saints it doth not stand in the wisdome and custodie of men but in the power of God 1 Cor 2. 5. Ephes. 1. 19 20. and cap. 3. 20. and the Saints of God they doe not preserue and keepe their graces or themselues but their graces and their persons are garded preserued and protected by God himselfe by Father Son and holy Ghost and that continually as you may reade Psal. 4. 8. Psal. 12.
because they did not beleeue that Christ had the words of eternall life neither were they sure that hee was that Christ the sonne of the liuing God For the Disciples which did beleeue this did continue with him euen for this very cause because they did beleiue it so that this example is impertinent because they were no true beleeuers The fourth example is from Dauid Dauid was a true regenerate man and Saint of God But hee fell from grace by committing adultery and murther For first hee prayes to God to create a new heart and to renew a right spirit within him Psal. 51. 10. Secondly hee was a murtherer and therefore had no eternall life abiding in him 1 Iohn 3. 14 15. Thirdly hee was guilty of adultery which disinherits men of heauen 1 Cor. 6. 10 Gal. 5. 21. and Ephes. 5. 5. Fourthly he lay long in these sinnes without repentance therefore a true regenerate man and Saint of God may fall from grace as Dauid did To this I answer that the Minor is false and that Dauid did not fall totally nor finally from grace in committing of these sinnes which I proue by these reasons First because it is not recorded in the whole booke of God that Dauid fell from the state of grace true it is it is recorded how he fell into these sinnes and I beleeue it to bee true because the Scripture tells me so but that Dauid fell totally from grace in committing of these sinnes the holy Ghost hath not recorded it it is but a bare collection of our Antagonists and therefore it is not to be beleeued Doubtlesse if Dauid had fallen totally or finally from the state of grace in committing these his sinnes the holy Ghost who hath recorded his sinne and life would haue recorded this his fall vnto vs since then the holy Ghost hath not recorded this his fall it is a point of arrogancie and strange presumption for our Antagonists so confidently to determine that Dauid fell away from the state of grace when as the Scriptures doe not warrant it Secondly it is euident that Dauid fell not away from the state of grace when as hee lay in these his sinnes because in the midest of these his sins which he fell into out of infirmitie and not out of any precogitated malice his heart was vpright towards God and the whole bent and frame of his heart was turned towards him for God himselfe testifieth of him that hee was a man after his heart Acts 13. 22. that hee went fully after the Lord. 1 Kings 11 6. and that his heart was perfect with the Lord. verse 4. and therefore since that God himselfe hath giuen such Elogies and testimonies of him it cannot stand together with them that Dauid should fall quite away from grace though hee fell into these sinnes Thirdly it is euident and plaine by Psal. 51. 11. for there hee prayes to God in his penitentiall Psalme which was penned when as the Prophet Nathan came vnto him and informed him of his sinnes of murther and adultery Cast me not away from thy presence and take not thy holy spirit from me If Dauid then immediately vpon the sight of these his sinnes did pray to God not to take away his holy spirit from him it is certaine then that hee had the spirit of God abiding in him notwithstanding these his sinnes else hee would haue prayed thus to God restore and giue me thy holy spirit ô Lord and not Lord take not thy holy spirit from me if then the spirit of God were still within him then certainely hee was not fallen totally from the state of grace Yea but saith Hunnius and some other of our Antagonists the spirit of God which hee lost by these his sins was now restored to him and therefore he prayes to God not to take it away from him not because hee lost it not before but because it was now restored vnto him againe I answer that this is but a meere cauill and an idle conceite not grounded on the Scripture For if Dauid had lost the Spirit by this sinne or if God had restored it to him againe no doubt but the Scripture would haue mentioned it and Dauid himselfe would haue expressed or at least haue intimated it in this Psalme of his which wee see hee doth not doe Againe if Dauid had lost the Spirit of God by these his sinnes I would demand of our Antagonists when this holy Spirit of God returnes vnto him againe whether before or after his repentance or in the very act of his repentance If before his repentance then Dauid was in the state of grace and not in the state of damnation before hee did repent which you your selues deny If after his repentance that cannot bee for repentance is the worke of the holy Ghost and vnlesse Dauid had had this holy Spirit of God he could not haue repented thus yea then Dauids prayer had beene in vaine for how could hee haue prayed vnto God not to take away his holy Spirit from him if he had it not as yet restored to him for when he penned this Psalme he did but begin he had not fully finished his repentance for these sinne therefore the holy Spirit of God was not restored to him after his repentance If it were restored vnto him in the very beginning and act of his repentance from whence doth that appeare sure I am there is no ground in Scripture for to warrant it and if it were so then it follows that the Spirit of God may bee restored vnto men before their actuall repentance which you denie because the very beginning of repentance or a thought to repent is no perfect actuall repentance no such repentance as you require to regaine the Spirit and the state of Grace And therefore seeing that the Scripture informes vs that the holy Ghost abides and dwells in mens hearts and soules for euer Iohn 14. 15. 16 and 1 Iohn 1. 20. 27. we may safely say that the holy Spirit of God was neuer taken away from Dauid but continued in him still Againe to what end should this prayer of Dauid serue if God had now restored his Spirit to him He had as yet committed no such sinne since the restitution of the Spirit to him as might cause God to depriue him of it and therefore this prayer of his was not so fitting to the purpose in this sense therefore we must take it in the apâ—…st sense and as Dauid did intend it Dauid he was affraid left God should depriue him of his holy Spirit for those sinnes which he had committed against him before and this was the cause and ground of this his prayer now therefore this his prayer and the whole Psalme hauing reference only to his former and not to his future sinnes it must needs follow that this prayer of Dauid extendeth meerely to the Spirit which hee had before his sinnes committed and not to the Spirit newly restored to him
Crowes and Rauens loues 〈◊〉 better then any other sweet and wholsome flesh that hee preferres the Rhemists Arminians before all his brethren or his Mother Church that hee is quite apostatized and fallen from the doctrine of the Church of England I say not from the state of true and sauing grace for that I dare presume he neuer had as yet into the very miâ—…e of Poperie and Arminianisme thinking to verefie this his doctrine of a 〈◊〉 and finall fall from grace by his owne example for want of better proofes I hope therefore that seeing Mr. Mountague had this his exposition and collection from Bertius and the Rhemists that you will rather hearken and yeeld to the sound and orthodox exposition which the Church of England hath heretofore made of it and which Doctor Benefield Bishop Carlton Mr. Rouse Mr. Yates and Mr. Rogers haue made of it then vnto Mr. Mountague who labours only to corrupt but not to expound the 16. Article Hauing thus proued that the Articles of the Church of England are vtterly against a totall and finall fall from grace that the 16. Article makes rather for me then against me I come now to the third thing to proue that the Homilies of the Church of England and the Common prayer booke make not against me As for the homilies they make not against me For first Mr. Mountague himselfe who obiecteth them confesseth that the Homilies are not the dogmaticall confirmed resolutions of the Church of England that they haue no dogmaticall positions or doctrine in them to be propugned or subscribed in all and euery point as the bookes of Articles and Common prayer haue therefore by Mr. Mountagues owne confession admitting that the Homilies were cleare againg me yet they proue not that the dogmaticall resolution and the receiued setled and established position of the Church of England is against me to because the dogmaticall publike resolutions of the Church of England are not 〈◊〉 in the Homilies neither are they such positiue current diuinitie as to be subscribed in all and entry point if Mr. Monntague may be credited But now you may wonder well what should be the cause that Mr. Mountague should so magnifie our Homilies in one place as to stile them authentis alt and orthodox records containing the established positiue and publikely professed doctrine of the Church of England and in an other place to slight and vilifie them so much and to contradict that which hee had written of them before 〈◊〉 Surely there is a mysterie in it and some pretty trick of more then Presbyterian-Legerdemaine For you may know that where Mr. Mountague doth presse magnifie our Homilies they giue some seeming colour to the Popish and Arminian doctrine of a totall and finall fall from grace but where he vilifies vnderualues them there they crosse and oppose him in his Popery in speaking against Images and therefore here they must not be the positiue doctrine and the dogmaticall resolution of the Church or if they be so yet Mr. Mountague did not subscribe to them in this particular and so they containe not the dogmaticall resolutions of the Church of England in this particular case for want of his subscription So that in Mr. Mountagues judgement the Homilies established and confirmed by the Church of England so far as they make for Poperie and Arminianisme are the dogmaticall resolutions and the authenticall and orthodox records of the Church of England and thus far are they to be subscribed to but as far as they make against Poperie Arminianisme they are not authenticall they are not the dogmaticall and positiue resolutions of the Church of England and thus farre they are not to be subscribed Very good Mr. Mountague if an honest man should haue said as much as this I doubt mee hee should haue lost his liuings his eares yea and his life ere this and that deseruedly too you can say thus much which is no more in substance but this that the Church of England is a meere Popish and Arminian Church and yet scape scot free take heede you smart not for it ere be long And doe you not deserue to vndergoe the sharpest censure that your Mother if your Mother can inflict vpon youâ—… I dare auouch it that you doe and I will proue it to or else I will suffer in your steede For you confesse in your Appeale pag 260. that the Homilies containe in them godly and wholesome exhortations to honour and worship almightie God and you grant that they containe in them godly and wholesome doctrine necessary for these times and you cite the 33. Article for the 35. Article for to proue it which shewes that Mr. Mountague is but an Ignoramus in our Articles to which hee hath so oft subscribed and yet you say in the same place that they containe not in them the publike dogmaticall and confirmed resolution positions and doctrine of the Church of England neither are they to be subscribed in all and euery point I pray obserue this passage well and then judge what Mr. Mountague is and what hee doth deserue For first in these words he affirmes that the doctrines established confirmed by the Church of England and commanded to be diligently and distinctly read in our Churches by the Ministers by our 35. Article are not the publike and receiued doctrine of our Church which as it is a contradiction in it selfe and a vilification both of our Articles and Homilies so it is a great disparagement to our Church accusing her either of ignorance and dotage in not knowing what her doctrine is or of inconstancie in hauing no setled and positiue doctrine or at least of grand hypocrisie in commanding such doctrines to bee diligently and distinctly read as godly and wholesome and as her publike and receiued doctrine when as it is nothing so Secondly in these words Mr. Mountague affirmes that the Homilies of the Church of England established by authoritie are not sound and orthodox which is contrary to the 35 Article to which hee hath so often subscribed for which very thing many honester men then himselfe haue not onely bin silenced from preaching which penalty Mr. Mountague needs not vndergoe for he is to dumme already in that kinde but haue likewise beene depriued and quite stripped of all their spirituall liuings and promotions Thirdly in these words Mr. Montague judgeth the Church of England as it is the Church of England to bee but a wicked haereticall and atheisticall Church in as much as there are many godly wholesome and necessary doctrines which though they are in the Church of England yet they are not the receiued established and confirmed doctrines and resolutions of our Church Fourthly by these words Mr. Mountague makes the Church of England but an incompleate and imperfect Church a Church in which there is no life and power of religion a Church which is all for faith and speculation but not for life and
17. 8. and Heb. 6. 19. but the faith which these two grounds had it had no roote at all Math. 13. 5 6 21. Luke 18. 13. it was such a faith or credulity rather which was setled in the vndâ—…rstanding but was not rooted and grounded in the heart and spirit therefore it was no true liuely justifying and sauing faith Fifthly because the faith of these two grounds is put by way of 〈◊〉 and opposition to that of the 〈◊〉 and good groâ—…nd these two temporary sorts of hearers are 〈◊〉 and distinguished from the fourth sort who did with honest and good hearts not only heare the word of God but keepe it to and bring forth fruite with patience which the others did not The text it selfe makes a kinde of speciall difference betweene the faith of the one and of the other and therefore their faith could not bee true because it is distinguished and put in opposition to the faith of the fourth ground But if all this will not giue you satisfaction I answer that the difference in this parable is only intended and meant of hearers not of beleeuers the parable informes vs that there are foure seuerall sorts of hearers not foure different sorts of beleeuers Now of all these foure sorts of hearers there was but one sort of them that were true beleeuers for in the other three sorts the word preached did not profit them and why was this because it was not mixed with faith in them that heard it Heb. 4. 2. therefore it is certaine that the three first sorts of hearers had no faith at all as you surmise they had neither can there be foure sorts of true belâ—…euers as you would hence collect for as there is but one God one Lord one spirit and one body so there is but one faith one kinde one sort and speciâ—…s of true beleeuers who are not different and many but all one in Christ. Ephes. 4. 3 4 5. 1 Cor. 12. 12 27. Rom. 15 5 6. 1 Cor. 1. 10. cap. 10. 17. 2 Cor. 13. 11. Phil. 1. 27. cap. 2. 2. Col. 3. 15. and therefore this Scripture being only meant of seuerall kindes of auditors and not of seuerall kindes of beleeuers makes nothing at all against mee The second example is of those Iohn 2. 23 24. Those that 〈◊〉 in the name of Christ when as they saw his miracles had true iustâ—…fying faith But these fell from grace for Iesus did not commit â—…imselfe vnto them for hee kâ—…ew all â—…en therefore the true regenerate Saints of God may fall from grace I answer that these had not true justifying and liuing faith within them which is euident by these reasons First because this faith was wrought only by the sight of miracles without the preaching of the Word and it was no more but a beleife that Christ was the true Messiah but true liuing justifying and sauing faith as it is alwaies a fruite of the spirit of God Gal. 5. 22. so it is alwaies wrought by the word of God Rom. 10. 14 15 27. whence it is stiled the word of faith Gal. 3. 2. and 1 Tim. 4. 6. therefore this beliefe which was wrought meerely by miracles without the word and spirit of God could be no true justifying and liuing faith Secondly these men could be no true beleeuers because the text saith that Iesus did not commit himselfe vnto them because hee knew all men and needed not that any should testifie of man for hee knew what was in man that is Christ knew them to be but hypocrites he knew their hearts were not vpright towards him and therefore he would not trust himselfe with them Now will any man dare to say that those whom Christ himselfe knew to be hypocrites that those to whom Christ would not commit himselfe were true beleeuers that they had true and sauing faith within them if hee doth as our Antagonists doe what is this but to make Christ ignorant of the estates of men and to make our selues more skilfull in discerning of mens hearts then hee Well marke these words of the Euangelist First he saith that Christ did not commit himselfe vnto them therefore they had no true faith therefore they were no true beleeuers For Christ is so farre from not committing of himselfe to true beleeuers that hee doth euen inhabit and dwell in their hearts by faith Ephes 3. 17. and 2 Cor. 13. 5. Secondly hee saith that the reason why Christ did not commit himselfe vnto them was because hee knew all men that is hee knew them to be hypocrites as most interpreters expound it if they were hypocrites and not sound at hart then they were no true beleeuers for true faith it purifieth the heart it makes it syncere and vpright and purgeth it from all hypocrisie Acts. 15. 9. Math. 23. 26. and 2 Cor. 2. 17. If you now object that they beleeued in his name therefore this phrase implyeth that they had true faith I answer that this phrase in this place for the reasons formerly giuen declares no more then this that they had an historicall faith that they beleeued him to be the Christ and not that they did rely and trust vpon him or take him for their Lord and Sauiour and in this very sense it is taken Math 7. 21. 22. Iohn 6. 2. 14. cap. 11. 40 41 48. cap. 12. 42 43. cap. 5. 44 Iames 2. 19. and so haue all interpreters agreed it vpon this place But admit that these Iewes here mentioned had true faith Then I deny your Minor that they fell away from it againe the text saith no such thing that they fell from grace and you can produce no other text of Scripture to proue that these particular Iewes which Saint John here mentions fell away from grace or faith it is your owne imagination and surmise wherefore let these bee true beleeuers or no true beleeuers this their example proues nothing against mee The third example is that of Iohn 6. 66. Many of Christs Disciples went backe and walked no more with him but these had true faith therefore those who haue true faith may fall from grace I answer that the Minor is false for Christ himselfe informes vs. ver 26 27. That these Disciples which departed from him did seeke and follow him not for his doctrine or his miracles or for that meate which indureth vnto euerlasting life but onely because they did eate of the loaues and were filled and therefore when he exhorted them to eate his flesh and drinke his blood that is to feed on him in their hearts by faith this very thing did so much offend them that they departed from him which makes it cleare that they had no faith at all for then they could not haue taken scandall at an exhortation vnto faith Yea Christ himselfe doth certifie vs verse 64 that those who departed did not beleeue and it appeares by Peters answer verse 68 69. that the reason why they did depart was only this