same substance with his Father And in (f) Cont. Gentil refutat 10. another place Nomen dei c. The Name of God by excellency doth pertayne only to the Father and he is only properly the Creatour of heauen and earth Nay more the Sonne is subiect to the Father also according to his Diuinity Againe in the same place Impropriam duram c. That is an improper hard speach of the Nicene Creed God of God Light of Light And in his 2. Epistle to the Poloniam he affirmeth that Christ according also to his Diuine Nature is inferiour to the Father Behould then whither this nouelty is come at last These things being considered what wise man can euer be brought to belieue that these men were sent of God to reforme the Church For how should they repayre this ruined Church who so shamefully destroy their owne doctrine Who can be thought so simple and of so small wisdome and circumspection that he cannot auoyd so manifest contradictions in matters of so great moment Certainly whosoeuer is contrary to himselfe and what he now establisheth by and by destroyeth againe he without all doubt doth not speake from the spirit of God For if I build saith the Apostle the same things againe which I haue destroyed I make my selfe a preuaricatour ad Galat. 2. The spirit of God cannot be contrary to it selfe nor deny it selfe Wherunto is added that although they contradict themselues in many thinges and ouerthrowe their owne pleas yet notwithstanding they are so bold malepart that they dare affirme themselues to be certaine of their owne Doctrine and the same to be most true and the very Doctrine it selfe of Christ For so saith Luther Certus sum quòd c. Contra Regē Angliae I am certayne that I haue my Doctrine from heauē And I am most certaine that my Doctrine is not myne but of Christ and that my doctrine cannot be contrary to it selfe seing that it is the Doctrine of Christ And in another place he saith Se ita esse c. that hit Doctrine is so certaine that he will not haue it iudged of Contra Statum Ecclesiast or contradicted by any man no not of the Angels And that no man can be saued vnlesse he receyue and imbrace his doctrine In like manner Caluin was wont often to exclayme in his sermons that he was a Prophet and that be could not be deceyued vnlesse God had deceyued him c. as before in the 5. Reason we haue shewed By which it is manifest that these men did not only not speake out of the spirit of God when as they are so full of errors and contradictions but that they be impostors also deceyuers of the people For whosoeuer affirmeth his Doctrine wherin there be so many errors and contradictions to be of God is presumed not to deale sincerely but to speake against his conscience and to beguile the people seeing that it is euident that he that doth so can haue no in ward light frō God wherby to make him certaine of the verity of his doctrine or the testimony of God because God cannot witnesse or reueale Doctrines contrary or repugnant one to the other With what force then do they so bouldly affirme that their Doctrine is of God or the Doctrine of Christ therfore they do not deale vprightly in this affayre but would only deceyue the world Some perhaps may answere herunto and say that now and then they erred in the beginning when as they had not as yet fully the spirit of God but afterward they neither erred nor changed their opinions But this answere hath no colour of truth For whosoeuer haue byn sent immediatly from God to teach and instruct the people they had presently in the very beginning of their mission an infallible assistance and direction from God so as they could neuer erre the least iote in their Doctrine as it is manifest of the Prophets and Apostles Nay in that beginning they had most of all need of that direction because then euery thing is more narrowly sifted and looked into and their authority and mission is compared with other learned men and their Doctrine For if they had byn taken in any error or contradiction all their credit and authority had byn lost and they had worthily byn reiected as false impostors and deceyuers of the people And so if Caluin and Luther had byn sent from God to repayre and reedify the Church it had byn specially necessary that straight in their begining their Doctrine had byn solide and without all contradiction least they might haue byn reiected and contemned as deceyuers and that worthily Againe I demaund of them when and at what tyme did they at length receyue that fulnes or plenitude of spirit that they could not erre any longer How should this be manifest to the world that men might know when to belieue them and when not to wit not in the beginning but yet in the later end For if this were not knowne they might presume and that worthily that they would erre as wel after as they had done before And finally it is euident that in all their life they were variable changing correcting or contradicting themselues almost in euery booke and worke they set forth as before we haue shewed by that little we haue alleaged and may do much more out of the many places produced by Cochlaeus Coccius and others out of their owne words and wrytings For the further they went comonly the more bitter they were and what they spake but mildly in the beginning that they eyther exaggerated or changed it into some contradiction in the end The VII Reason Taken from the fraudes and deceipts which the Sectaries commonly vse THAT Religion is alwayes to be had in suspition whose Authors mantayners do vse guile deceyts and lyes to vphold and establish the same For that true Religion doth not need any such helps but false Religion which when she is destitute of true and solid reasons she must necessarily place all her hope in lyes But now the Authors and mantayners of Lutheranisme and Caluinisme do vse many fraud◠and lyes wherwith to propagate their religion Ergo they are worthily to be suspected That they vse deceyts it is manifest Heretiks impose false doctrine vpon Catholiks First for that they do falsely charge the Catholikes with many absurdityes wherby they may more easily impugne and defame their Religion as for example that the Papistes do worship images wood stocks stones euen as Ethnicks do adore their Idoles so as whatsoeuer they find in Scripture that is against the worshipping of Idols that they bring in against the veneration of Images In which case they deale not sincerely For they know wel inongh or may know if they will that in the Catholike Church Images of Saintes were neuer adored as Gods or with any worship that is due vnto God alone as Idols are adored by
faith eyther for guilt or payne what should let him to commit neuer so grâ—euous or emormous wickednes What should he feare Hell or Purgatory Neyther for by liuely faith alone no syn shal be imputed to any man although it be neuer so grieuous and filthy What then Shall he feare the Diuine wrath or the subtraction of heauenly Grace No for that God doth not impute the same vnto him and for the satisfaction that Christ made he cannot be offended with him Doth he feare temporall satisfaction or Confession Neyther For that these things are taken away as superstitions What then doth this man more feare then any Atheist Or how doth he not open as wyde a gate to all wickednes impurity as the Atheist What Atheisme teacheth the Scripture witnesseth when she fayth The foole said in hic hart Psal 13. there is no God they are corrupt and are made abhominable in all their endeauours There is not one that doth good there is not so much as one And this doth Atheisme teach for so much as it taketh away the feare of Diuine punishment wherby men are held as with a bridle from synning But these Religions do no lesse take a way the feare of heauenly reueng and chastisement when as they teach that nosyn shal be imputed eyther for offence or payne nor any man punished therfore Moreouer I say that by these Religions this wholsome feare of God is sooner taken a way then by Atheisme For few Atheists do certainly belieue that there is not any God at al but many doubt it and feare the contrary and so they be not without feare of punishment of him They take away all feare of God foure manner of wayes that may in many things represse them But these Religions do for certaine without all doubt teach that synnes are not imputed to the faithfull and this they commaund to be most firmely belieued and therfore they leaue no feare but do shake of all suspition imaginatioÌ„ of punishment whatsoeuer so as they giue a far greater scope to all wickednes then Atheisme doth Neyther do they this by one manner of way only but by a fourefold First For that they teach that through saith synnes are not imputed vnto vs be they neuey so many or neuer so heynow wherof we haue spoken inough before Secondly For that they say that all those who haue true faith are predestinated Calu. l. 3. c. 2. §. 6.7.11.12.15.16 38. and that they ought to belieue the same most assuredly And if all the followers of these Sectes be predestinated and that they are bound to belieue the same most firmely wherfore then should they be sollicitous eyther to liue well or to shun the workes of the flesh which the Apostle recounteth For neyther can they doubt of their saluation or that they shall go to hell because Gods predestination is potent and immutable and those who are so predestinated cannot possibly perish Neyther can they feare the paynes of Purgatory which they beleeue not nor yet can they feare punishments in this life when as synnes are not imputed to them by God Thirdly For that they take away the liberty of Freewill and do teach Luth. in Assert art 36. l. 1. cap. 16. §. 8. that all things happen by an ineuitable necessity and that a man caÌ„not make his works better or worse For if there be no liberty there is properly no sinne like as a lyon when he demoureth a man although he committeth euill yet sinneth not because he doth it not freely but by the vehement instigation of nature nor is it in his power to moderate this his instigation Noe man shall be then worthy of punishment because that which is done by force of necessity deserueth no punishment Wherefore there shal be no hell nor any punishment at all after this life For that it should be a great and intollerable cruelty to damne a man to euerlasting torments for those things which by no meanes he could auoid Wherfore then should they feare to follow their harts desire or do any thing that may please their appetite Fourthly For that they teach all mens workes Luth. supra Cal. l. 1. cap. 17. § 5. cap. 18. §. 1. as well good as bad to haue bin preordained of God from all eternity and to that end the wills of men are by him inclined incited forced and determined to performe the same For if God do worke in vs as well bad as good there is no reason why we should endeauour to auoid euill or feare the punishment therof For that God is not the reuenger of that wherof he is the Author nor can he punish that which he will haue done in vs and causeth vs to do For that this should be more then Tyrannicall cruelty from which God is knowne to be fare off and free Here by then it is as cleare as the funne that these Religions by these foure wayes now declared do take froÌ„ the minds of meÌ„ all feare of God do giue as large a scope to all wickednes as euer any Atheisme in the world and that the more perniciously because the are not exercised in the open view and shew of impiety but vnder the colour forsooth of diuine religion and honour to wit vnder the faire titles of only faith satiffaction of Christ liberty of the new Ghospell diuine prouidence and predestination Vnder these shaddows thus couertly hid is swallowed so much venome that it wholy poysoneth the mindes and maners of men Who then that hath but the least dramme of an vpright iudgment that will thinke such Religions to come from God III. CONSIDERATION Drawne froÌ„ the Sanctity of the followers of true Religion THAT Religion is to be preferred wherin very many men haue byn famous for sanctity of life For it cannot be that a naughty religion should lead a man to sanctity or that true sanctity should abide with a naughty religion But Catholike religion hath had very many in her Church in all ages who by common confession and wittnes of all the Christian world were most holy men Amongst whome to omit innumerable others were S. Antâ—ny the great S. Hilarion S. Gregory Thaumaturgus S. Nicolas Bishop of Myra S. Athanasius S. Gregory Nazianzen S. Basill S. Simeon Stelites S. Cipryan S. Hilary S. Martin S. Ambrose S. Hierome S. Augustine S. Benet S. Gregory the Great S. Vedastus S. AmaÌ„dus S. VVinock S. Bertin S. Romwald S. VVillebrord S. Boniface S. Bruno S. Bernard S. Romuald S. Nortbert S. Dominicke S. Francis S. Themas of Aquine S. Bonauenture S. Francis à Paula and many more in our age That all these men were followers of the Catholike religion there can be not doubt aswell for that they adhering to the Roman Church did professe the faith therof wonderfully propagated the same as also for that most of theÌ„ were Monkes vowed religiou men nay all monasticall institutions professions had their begining by
Caluin is also manifest out of the Iudiciall Actes and processe of the Citty of Noyon in France Bolsecus in vita Calui ni cap. 5. Iul. Brigerus pag. 59. that he was conuicted of a wicked crime and by sentence condemned to haue byn publiquely burned if by the intercession of the Bishop of that place that punishment had not byn changed into whipping and burning vpon his backe with a hoat iron Wherby it is cuident that both by law deed he was infamous L. 1. ff de his qui not antur insamia and L. Quid ergo § Ex compromisso ff de his qui not antur infamia Of the pride and rayling of Luther it is euident First because from this fountaine to wit of pride all his doctrines toke their beginning For when as certayne Indulgences were to be promulgated in Germany and that the office therof hauing heertofore belonged to the Augustine Friars now they being at this tyme pretermitted the same was giuen in Commission to the Dominicans Which thing Luther taking in very ill part began with a splene to preach against Indulgences and though he were therof admonished and reprehended notwithstanding by little and little he not only continued the same but adioyned heerunto many more and greater articles of faith against the Authority of the Pope wherby he caused wonderfull troubles and garboyles throughout all Germany as largely wryteth Ioannes Cochlaeus that was an eye wittnes of all these things in the Acts of Luther an 1517. This pride and anger then was the first origen and ofspring of all Luthers doctrine without which perhaps Lutheran Religion had neuer byn nor so many other new sectes neither which since that tyme haue sprong vp and risen from thence Secondly for that Luther in his Epistle to those of Strasburge writeth that he would gladly deny the Reall presence of Christ in the holy Eucharist therby to trouble vex the Popedome if the Scriptures were not cleere against the same to the contrary And in another place he writeth thus If a Councell should appoint or permit the receyuing of the SacrameÌ„t vnder both kinds lib. de formula miss we by no meanes would vse both but in despite of the Councell and appointment therof would eyther vse one or neyther cursing all such as by order of that Councell should vse both kinds c. Heere yow see he teacheth vs to abstayne from a thing necessary for our Saluation and that only in despite of the Councell that should comand or appoint it when as notwithstanding we may and oftentymes ought to obay euen a Tyrant when he comaundeth things lawfull Wherby we may see with what spirit he was caried way For what may be compared to this fury of his The same Luther in his booke against K. Henry the 8. of England wryteth that Kings Princes Popes are not worthy to loose the lachet of his shoe and that himselfe will be accompted for a holy man whether men will or no. Also that he cares not for a thousand Cyprians nor a thousand Augustines Also Christian Princes Kings and Emperours he calleth Tyrants Idiots fooles simple fellowes wild beasts hangmen nittes bubles enemyes of God most wicked knaues inuenteth scurrilous songes and rithmes against them Of Caluins pride and rayling besides that which D. Bolsecke hath aboundantly written the same is most euident in * lib 2. Inst c. 14. §. 3. lib. 3. c. 4 §. 10. lib. 4. c. 12. §. 20. alibi Caluins owne books also for that he doth euery where contemn al the holy and ancient Fathers of the Church and male partly accuseth them of errour The Schoole doctors he calleth Sophistes In his Sermons he oftentymes brake forth into these and such like words I am a Prophet I haue the spirit of God and if I erre God hath deceyued me and brought me into errour for the sinnes of the people c. He wrote also diuers letters and pamphlets of his own praises dignity merit in the Church which he alwaies published eyther in other mens or some feygned name as D. Bolsecke and others do wryte Many the like trickes might I alledge aswell against these as against other Authors and defenders of the new Religions of this Age but that I am very vnwilling to occupy my selfe in such affayres He that will see more in this kind let his read the life of Beza written also by D. Bolsecke Flores â—ulij Brigeri Surius his Comentaryes others Now then considering these things who can once thinke with himselfe that God would choose and vse such men as these were to wit infamous by all law and iudgment of the whole world of a most filthy life of an vnbridled and rayling tongue of a proud ambitious angry and enuious mind to be the reformers of his Church Who euer noted any such conditions or qualityes either in the Apostles or Prophets who were all most humble and no wayes infamous for any wickednes And although they were vnlearned and simple notwithstanding vpon a suddaine the were indued with admirable wisdome sanctity of life and grace of miracles They were wonderfully lowly of mynd of wonderfull meeknes they contemned the pleasures of this life and the earthly delightes of all thinges they were indued with wonderfull charity towards their neighbours they were wonderfully modest and circumspect in all their words and actions These and the like conditions and qualities we fee to haue byn in all such whome God hath vsed for the Conuersion of Nations and reformation of Christian people As for example in S. Augustine the Apostle of the English in S. Bonisace the Apostle of the Germans in S. Adalbert S. Etto S. VVillebrord S. Eloy and other Apostles of other Nations Also in S. Benet S. Bernard S. Romuald S. Dominike S. Francis and others by whose example and doctrine very many haue byn stirred vp to the contempt of earthly and transitory things and loue celestiall And if God did vse such men as these to the Conuersion of any Nation or Prouince or to the reformation or correction of manners in any people whose life was admirable to the world who notwithstanding did not receiue their mission immediatly from God but from the Pope by whome they were sent to do and execute these offices then I pray yow what manner of men had it byn fit that these should-haue byn who are said to haue byn sent inmediatly froÌ„ God and this not only for the reformation of the chiefe heads and points of religion but also to the reedification instauration of the whole Church and Kingdome of Christ now ruined And although al the sanctity and excellency all the vertues and spirituall giftes which were eyther in S. Iohn Baptist or any of the Apostles had byn all heaped togeather in one and had byn all infused into these men yet had the same not byn sufficient to warrant their Authority of so great a busines And shall we be so sottish then
as to belieue that God would euer vse such men for so meruaylous and high an enterprize as were not only not endued with any holines of life at al but rather to the contrary full of all infamy impurity pride reueng and rayling For to what end had this byn els but to giue occasion to such as haue but the least dram of wisdome not to admit them but as false impostors to auoyd and detest them For if those who be infamous may not by the * Cap. infamibus li. 6. L. Qui accusare ff de accusat l. 1. ff de postulaÌ„ do law be admitted to any dignity or to any office eyther Ecclesiasticall or secular no nor to accuse or demaund How then shall such be admitted as reformers of religion as chiefe architects or heads of the Church or as Iudges of Bishops Popes and generall Councells The VI. Reason From their errors and inconstancy in Doctrine THE sixth reason is for that the Authors of these new religions haue manifest errors and are very inconstant in their doctrine which is an euident signe that they haue not the infallible direction of the Holy Ghost and therfore are not sent immediatly from God nor any trust is to be giuen vnto them For how many soeuer haue byn sent of God to teach and instruct the people were so gouerned by his heaueÌ„ly assistance and direction that they could not be deceaued in anything eyther in their teaching preaching or writing So as there was neuer any the least error found in the doctrine of the Prophets or Apostles which our Sauiour insinuateth saying Iota vnum aut vnus apex non praeteribit à lege donec omnia fiant One iote or one tittle shall not passe of the law till all be fulfilled Matth. 5. Epist 19. The same thing doth S. Augustine teach largely in his Epistle to S. Hierome where he sayth That if in any writer one fault only should be found it were inough to discredit the whole authority of that wryter For he that is deceaued in one might be deceaued in more and therfore we may not firmly rely vpon him Luther himselfe also teacheth vs the same thing in many places of his workes Lib. contra EmpseruÌ„ whose words are these Si semel deprehenderer c. If I should be once fouÌ„d so lying false and grossely ignorant then should all my learning honor and fidelity vtterly haue an end In assert Teuton art 25. for that euery man as reasen requireth would account me for a lewd and infamous knaue And againe Qui semel mentitur c. whosoeuer is once taken in a lye know most certainly that he is not of God but ought to be suspected in all things c. Which thing 〈◊〉 inculcateth in six other seuerall places of his workes Nay moreouer our Sauiour himselfe gaue vnto vs this signe in the Scripture that if a tany tyme we deprehended a Prophet fortelling any thing that was false we should certainely know that he was not sent of God This being layed as a sure foundation I make this argument Whosoeuer in his doctrine doth erre but in any one point he is not sent from God but Caluin and Luther in their doctrines do erre in many things Ergo it is certaine that they are not sent of God The Maiâ—r is already sufficiently proued which our Aduersaries themselues do also confesse The Minor I proue thus For to omit all those things which they do falsely obiect to Catholiks and which they do falsly affirme to be noueltyes in our Doctrine and vnknowne to the ancients To omit also all historicall and chronographicall errors I wil lay forth only two of theirs of most moment which are common to then both The one That we haue no frewill but all things do happen through an ineuitable necessity The other That God is no lesse the Author and sorcer of euill works then of good That these be most manifest and pernicious errors is euident because they take a way all policy all good counsell all lawes and preceptes all Iudges and Tirbunales For that all these are in vayne if there be no frewill in man Moreouer the punishing of all kind of wickednes shal be vniust also for that whatsoeuer is not free of it selfe what soeuer is done by God as the author and compeller therof deserueth no punishment And finally by this meanes they take away hell it selfe and all punishment of the life to come and bring in a most profuse liberty to all kind of vice and sinne as before we haue shewed in the second Consideration These very two opinions haue giuen occasion to many to go froÌ„ Caluinisme to Turcisme or els to Atheisme For that it is much better to haue no God Flores Calu. pag. 49. then such a one who is compeller and Author of all wickdnesse Now as concerning the inconstancy of their doctrine euen in most speciall things the same is incredible Since the world began there was neuer found a writer so inconstant so forgetful and so contrary to himselfe and ouerthrower of his owne doctrine as Luther For that he doth no lesse impugne himselfe then the holy Fathers and Councells that almost in all the chiefe heads of faith as * In operâ— inscripto Lutherus Septiceps Ioannes Cochlaeus and others do shew at large And about that only controuersy of the Eucharist out of Luthers owne workes himselfe being yet aliue were noted 36. manifest contradictions by one Gaspar (a) In tabula contradict Lutheri Querhamer a lay man of Saxony and published to the world to Luthers vtter confusion and no small cracke of his credit In like manner about Communion vnder one kind were noted by Cochlaeus seauen different heads contradictory one to the other And finally the whole booke of Cochlaeus intituled Lutherus Septiceps conteyneth nothing els but Luthers contradictions and contrary opinions almost of euery article in controuersy set downe and expressed in his owne very words And in euery contradiction yow know it is necessary that one part be falst Of Caluins Contradictions 24. are set downe by Coccius in his owne words two wherof will be sufficient to set downe in this place Of Gods omnipotency in one (b) ad cap. 1. Lucae place he saith Verbo Dei c. There is no impossibility to be obiected to the word of God And in (c) ad Cap. 2 I saiae another place he saith Illud somnium c. That dreame of the absolute power in God which the deuynes haue introduced is an execerable blasphemy And (d) de praedestinatione againe Ego detestor c. I do detest this doctrine wherewith the â—apisticall deuines do please themselues when they feigne a certaine absolute power in God c. About the diuinity of Christ in one (e) ad cap. 1. loan vers 1. place he wryteth Christum esse verum Deum c. That Christ is true God of the
bee effected by the onely forces of nature Lib. 3. c. 16. § 2. sequent c. 19.6.2.4 7. but all other also vnder what specious title soeuer bee excluded by the iustice of fayth And the same he teacheth in many other places If then there bee no merit at all in good works if they make vs nothing the more accepted to God nor wee for them shall receiue any reward in heauen wherefore should we weary our selues in exercising them Wherefore should wee spend our goods in workes of mercy towards the relieuing of the poore why should wee insist and spend houres in prayer wherfore should wee fast or punish our bodyes It is a folly for vs to weary our selues out in them to be sollicitous about the exercising of them if no fruit returne vnto vs by them Who seeth not that by this doctrine all desire and care of good works is extinguished and cleane taken away Secondly for that both these Religions teach that all our good workes do not onely merit no good at all before God but further then this bee also syns and that indeed of themselues mortall though for their fayth they bee not imputed to the beleeuers And Luther in many places teacheth no lesse As when he sayth (a) In resolut contra Eckium in assert art 31. The iust sinneth in euery good work Againe (b) In assert art 32. a good worke done in the best maÌ„ner is according to gods mercy a veniall sinne but according to his iudgment a mortal sin In another place (c) In assert art 29. Our best works whereby wee labour to procure of God grace help comfort is to bee reputed vnto vs for sin as the Prophet sayth Psal 108. And his prayer be vnto him to sin The same he inculcateth in maÌ„y other places Caluin deliuereth the same doctrine For this he saith Lib. 3. Instit c. 12. §. 4. All the workes of men if they bee censured as they deserue bee nothing but foule staines and filth Neyther can any work proceed from holy men that deserueth not the iust reward of reproach The same he teacheth c. 14. els where Lib. 3. c. 14. § 9. If all our good workes bee truly sins foule staines and filth that merit Gods ire who seeth not that it is much better to abstaine from them then to do them For by forbearing them we sin not but by doing them we sin and much better it is not to sin then to sin We must therfore abstaine from giuing of almes and from doing other works of mercy yea we must cease to pray because all these as they are done of vs bee sins And how may all study and desire of good workes be better ouerthrowne then by teaching that they do not onely make vs nothing the more iust or better before God but that they bee further silth foule staynes and syns indeed Neither maketh it to the purpose that they so ofteÌ„ say that God requireth good works for a testimony of faith Whether good works be required as the signe of faith or as signs of faith sith they affirme it least they may seeme to the people to take away al good works cleare But this their pretense is vaine For how doth God require them if they be syns which vnles he of his mercy should not impute theÌ„ he should punish with euerlasting paine how doth he for a testimony of faith require those things that do rather giue a testimony of want of fayth For those who bee follicitous about the doing of good workes do ther by testifie that faith sufficeth not For if faith were inough as they will haue it and good workes auaile nothing at all how bee good workes a signe of faith Therfore the study of good works is not a signe of that speciall faith wherof they speake and whereunto they ascribe all but of the Catholike faith whereby wee beleeue that faith is not inough but that workes bee further required that bee meritorious of euerlasting life with which faith they haue nothing to do at all but reiect it wholy By what hath been sayd most euident it is that by those Religions all study and care of good workes is taken away and banished quite The IX Reason Deduced from the liberty of life which they yeald vnto THOSE Religions cannot possibly bee thought to haue been instituted by Christ that do vtterly spoile mens minds of the feare of God and do open a most wide gate to all wickednes and to all maÌ„ner of impurity of life For holy writ doth euery where inculcate vnto vs the feare of God neyther it there any thing that is more often repeated more recomended vnto vs syth therof especially dependeth all goodnes honesty of life But the Religion of Luther and Galuin both do quite thrust out of mens minds the feare of God and yeald a liberty to all manner of wickednes as far as doth Atheisme therfore neither the one nor the other can pretend Christ to bee the Author of their Religion That they do this and that by foure different and diuers wayes hath beene by vs most plainely set downe declared in the second consideration before now I will in few words againe manifest proue the same by these reasons following First for that the Lutherans Religion teacheth that the decalogue or ten Commandments appertaine not to the faythful as neither the ceremoniall and iudicial lawes also For thus he sayth in his sermon of Moyses By the Text it euidently appeareth that the ten precepts also do nothing concerne vs for as much as our Lord brought not vs but the lewes only out of Aegypt Moyses is not held in the new testament for if I should obserue him in one article I should be bound to the obseruation of the whole Law The same be teacheth in many wordes c. 4. Epist ad Galat. in c. 20. Exodi If the ten Commandments bind vs no more then the cerimoniall laws as he expresly teacheth c. 4. ad Galat. therefore as I am not bound to keep the cerimoniall law for example to circumcise the flesh to eate the Paschall â—ambe to obserue the Sabboaths c. so neither the morall law or the ten Commandments If I be dispensed from obseruation of the ten Commandements what may it not be lawfull for me to do I may then in outward shew adore Idols contemne parents make no reckoning of Magistrats commit murthers adulteryes robberyes giue false testimouies and such like that be prohibited and forbidden by the decalogue euen as I may do those thinges that haue repugnance with the cerimoniall law And though Caluin doth not in expresse maÌ„ner delyuer the same Doctrine couching the coÌ„mandements yet vnderhand he sufficiently infiâ—uateth it Lib. 2. Instit cap. 7. §. 5. First when he teacheth That it is impossible also for holy men to keep Gods law For if it be impossible it bindeth not at all sith none
away that maketh to the substance of doctrine All this cannot to be known by Scripture but proued only by certaine humane weake coniectures if you take away the traditions of the Church and so the whole foundatiō of our fayth shall rely vpon vncertaine coniectures Moreouer the vertue and efficacy of the Scripture consisteth not in the sound of the words but in the sense meaning which is the life and soule of the Scripture But there may be a thousand controuersies about the sense which cannot in any sort be decided by the Scripture it selfe if you take a way Traditions and the exposition of the Fathers as experience teacheth For about the sense of these words Hoc est Corpus meum and of many more there is most eager disputation betwene the Lutherans and Caluinists c. If you say with Caluin that the iudgment touching the Scriptures and the vnderstanding of them belongeth to an inward spirit this is nothing but the dictamen of an internall spirit that is for the priuate iudgment of euery particular person to set down the first rule how to beleeue For euery one may say that he hath the spirit and by the inspiration therof can iudge and determine that this part or booke is holy Scripture and not that that this is the sense not that So a◠Lutheran out of his spirit giueth iudgment In prologonou◠Testamer ti that S. Iames Epistle is a strawy Epistle and the Apocalyps of S. Iohn of doubtfull authority But the Caluinist out of his soiri◠iudgeth the one and the other to be the word of God So Luther out of his spirit iudgeth that this false opinion is to be abolished that there be foure Gospells for that S. Iohns Gospell is but one faire true and principall and to be far preferred before the other three In like manner S. Paules and S. Peters epistles do sar go beyond sayth be the three Gospells of Mathew Marke and Luke He would willingly haue reiected them because they plainely proue establish the merit and necessity of good works and the obseruation of the commaundements and do recommend chastity and pouerty But when he durst not cleane reiect them he would extennate their authority and insinuate that they were not written with the spirit of God In like maner Caluin out of his own sense iudgeth that these words Hoc est Corpus meum haue this meaning This breed is the figure of my body and Luther will haue it This bread is truly my body I omit other thing without nūber by which it appeareth that euery ones priuate iudgment is proposed for arule of beleefe or which is the same that the Scripture it selfe is expounded and interpreted according to euery ones priuate iudgment Secondly that is not any fit rule of beliefe that is a like accommodated to contrary doctrines but the scripture is accommodated to contrary Religions and doctrines for as much as all the Sects of this time though they do in an hostile manner dissent and contend in very many and those the most inportant heads and grounds do neuertheles make this rule to serue their turne and doe vse it for the mantayning of their opinions and heresyes For the Lutherans say they rely vpon Scripture the Caluinists affirme the same the Anabaptists also are nothing behind them in auerring that the Scriptures be for them And no meruaile because euery one of them taketh and interpreteh the Scripture not conforme to the comon vnderstanding of the Church or the common exposition of the Fathers as do the Catholikes but according to the sense of euery priuate spirit in which sort it may bee easilie accommodated to all heresies Whence it is euident that this rule so taken serueth not the turne whiles all is reduced to the iudgment of euery ones priuate spirit Thirdly if there were some iudge who in euery Controuerly wherein he were to giue sentence should so doe it as it could not be certainly vnderstood for whether party he pronounced the sentence but both partyes should contend that the matter were adiudged and determined on their side and that the sentence of the Iudge was expresly plainly pronounced for them such an one in the opinion of all men could not be thought a competent Iudge sith no matter in cōtrouersie could bee determined or ended by sentence giuen by him For after sentence there would bee as greata contention about the sentence it selfe whether of them it might seeme to fauour as there had been before about the right that ech party had And such a Iudge is Holy Scripture if you take away the Churches interpretation and declaration and the exposition of the holy Fathers for as much as the sentence therof is euer such as it cannot bee euident to both parties whether of them it fauoureth whiles the one and the other doth stifly maintaine that it is most plaine that it holdeth and standeth for them And hence it is that controuersies bee neuer ended and therefore it is not onely a vaine but also a ridiculous thing to appoint the Scripture alone for Iudge For in euery controuersy there ought such a Iudge to be designed who may so giue sentence as it may be manifest to all and most of all to those parties on whose behalf the cause is adiuged otherwise such a controuersy can neuer be ended Wherfore those who make the Scripture alone the Iudge of matters in question do therin plainely manifest that they admit not any iudge at all by whome the cause may be determined besids their priuate iudgment alone For they do as if Titus and Caius hauing a suite at Law would not haue any other Iudge in the matter but Iustinian his Code together with the Pandects without hauing any thing to do with the interpretation of Doctors and Titus producing for his owne right some law should by it maintayne that the cause was manifestly adiudged for him And Caius againe should deny it who by citing an other law for himselfe should say that it was cleare that that law fauoured made for him which Titus would in lake manner deny and so they should both depart without any decision of the cause or controuersy in hand would it not be a matter worthy of laughter and all would say that neyther of them desired the determination or decision of the cause And that neyther admitted other Iudge then his owne iudgment In the very like manner in this that they wil not haue any other Iudge then Scripture and euery one reserueth the interpretatiō thereof to his owne spirit they plainely shew that they haue no will that the cause should be decided or defined by any lawfull way nor to admit any Iudg but their owne iudgment Fourthly how very insufficient this rule of beliefe is experience it selfe plainely teacheth For we see that there is not any end of controuersies among them euen about the greatest matter of fayth sith at this very tyme the Lutherans Caluinists
the most certaine and only way to life euerlasting and none there is who strayeth out of it that is not most assured to runne into euerlasting perdition It is a Doctrine of Atheisme that euery one may be saued in his owne religion But as there is one God one Christ one truth one certitude one iustice so there is one fayth and one religion and one Church or Congregation of God and Christ out of which there can be no Saluation Let them take heede that they spoyle not themselues of so great a good eyther out of a curiosity of reading or hearing or by an improuident and vncircumspect conuersation with heretiks or out of a desire of pleasing and contenting some or for feare of some hurt in temporall life also or out of an hope of commodity and gaine or for desire of honors or for any other cause What profiteth it a man if he gayne the whole world and suffer the detryment of his soule or what exchaunge shall a man giue for his soule But he that sustayneth hurt in his religion cannot but hurt his soule withall and therefore let him not be afraid to expose all for the retayning of it the loosing and forgoing whereof is the losse of life euerlasting withall Vnhappy be those soules and vnworthy a Christian name that make but a little reckouing of the ouerthrow of the Catholike religion so they may themselues enioy temporall peace for the gathering and keeping of the poore things and trifles of this life This madnes and light estceme of so great a good will cost them deare when this short time moment of life shall be once past and they shall vpon the suddaine be brought to that eternity that neuer endeth Many seducers haue come into the world many do vnder a sheeps skyn and vnder a faire flattering shew of Gods word hide and conceale their woluish fury to the vtter ruine of Christs sheep Our Lord admonished vs more theÌ„ once to take heed of them the Apostles inculcated no lesse as did the holy Fathers also He Eccl. 13. Eccl. 3. that shall touch pitch shall be defiled of it he that loueth daÌ„ger shal perish therein The times were neuer more trecherous to mans saluation then now they be the deuill was neuer more frequent in bewitching and deceiuing men were neuer more easily caried away with the spirit of incoÌ„stancy the operatioÌ„ working of errour neuer of more force finally mens minds neuer more fouly blinded then now all these do worthily seize vpoÌ„ their minds who do make a light esteeme of that noble and great gift of the Catholike and Orthodoxe Religion prefer their temporall and externall goods before it Wherefore let them who make a reckoning of their owne saluation conserue this beauenly gemme and keep it with all diligence for that of it proceedeth life And because it is a supernaturall gift which can neyther be obtayned nor kept and held without Gods help whiles so many and so great daungers and enemyes beset vs on all sides they mustimplore and craue help at Gods hands incessantly to that end both for themselues their children and their family and seeke to appease God by almes and other offices of piety For good is prayer with fasting almes Tob. 12. and better then to lay vp treasures of gold Let them lead a life correspondent to their religion let them quench their thirst of terrene things with the expectation of the celestiall and euerlasting goods euer mindâ—ull of that saying of the Apostle 1. Timoth. 6. They that will become rich fall into temptation and into the snares of the Diuell many vnprofitable and hurtfull desires which drowne a man into destruction and perdition For the roote of all euill is desire which some coueting haue strared from the fayth and thrust themselues into many sorrowes With these helps they may walke on in safety amidst the daungers of these tymes conserue and maintayne vnstayned the gift of the true and only Religion and by it with facility and case purchase life euerlasting to which God of his infinite mercy bring vs all Amen FINIS AN APPENDIX TO THE FORMER CONSVLTATION WHETHER Euery One may be saued in his owne Fayth and Religion WRITTEN By the same Leonard Lessius of the Society of IESVS Permissu Superiorum M.DC.XVIII THE PREFACE WEe haue before in the Preface of our Consultation set downe and briefely confuted a certaine grosse error which holdeth it inough for our saluatioÌ„ to belieue in Christ and that he died for our sinnes But because it is much spread and hath sunke deeply into the minds of many I was requested to treate of the matter more at large and therefore now I will deuide it into two seuerall Questions bringing arguments for eyther part The first Question shal be VVhether it be sufficient for saluation to belieue in God and do no man iniury which is as much to say as Whether euery man may be saued in his owne Faith which he professeth if therin he endeauour to liue honestly The second Question VVhether it be sufficieÌ„t to saluatioÌ„ to belieue in Christ that he dyed for our sinnes although we belieue not many other articles of faith THE I. QVESTION CONCERNING the first Question many in these tymes do hold are of opinion that euery man may be saued in his owne religion The ground of ouâ— Aduersaries opinions their principall reasoÌ„ wherwith they are moued to this is because it seemeth vnto them incredible that al Iewes and Turkes many of whom do deuoutly worship God and deale iustly with their neyghbours should perish for all eternity only because they haue not belieued in Christ especially since for want of this beliefe they seeme not to deserue much blame they being from their infancy trayned vp in a religion different from Christianity For why say they should God who would all men to be saued so strayten the way vnto heauen why should those miserable souls who according to their capacity do their best to please him do wrong to no man and do lead a iust and honest life be condemned to eternall payne for the ignorance of that thing wherein they were neuer sufficiently instructed The I. Reason But this opinion of theirs The same refuâ—ed by foure Reasons although in naturall reason it may seeme to carry some colour of truth and equity yet considering those thinges which are reuealed vnto vs in holy Scriptures it is a meere Paradox For if euery Turke and Iew may be saued in their beliefe then iuvaine haue the Apostles and holy Fathers so much laboured in preaching planting of the Christian faith In vaine so many Martyres by all manner kind of torments haue shed their bloud and spent their life in the confession therof For they might haue abstayned from this doctrine profession without any preiudice to their saluation and haue rested contented with the Iewes in the profession and