eating the bread or seeing the bread broken then by hearing the vvord preached Yow confesse that by the vvord we get possession of the sonne of god yow coÌ„fesse we possesse him by the vvord fully and perfitly This possession is the vvorke of faith and the body of Christ is not othervvise gripped possessed or eaten in the supper but by faith when as we beleeue that Christ died for out redemption and rose again for our iustification VVhich being al your ovvne doctrine hovv can yovv explicate to the intelligence of any man that vve better grip possesse and eate Christ in bread and vvine then in the vvord It a true honest man vvhose vvords I trust before vvitnesses geue me a booke and I take it of him and being possessed of it vse it as myne ovvne neuer a vvhit doubting of my right if the same person after come to me and vvil persvvade me by an external signe and say Sir see here is a peece of bread as truly as I breake and eate this bread I geue yow that booke haue I by this external act any better possession right interest or grip in the booke then I had before certainly not In like sort Christ dwelleth in our harts by faith his vvord assureth vs after these mens doctrine that so often as vve trust to be saued by his passion vve eate his flesh and drinke his blud and that fully truly verily really and substantially VVhereas then vve make no doubt of present possession vvhich we already fully and perfitely enioy hovv can this possession be better any vvaies because vve see bread broken before our eyes Again let him remember the resolution of his principal Doctors vvho haue taught vs the cleane contrarie to that he preacheth here vz that Christ is receiued â— possessed as fully by the vvord as by their sacramental bread Let him remember his ovvne preaching in this same Sermon where he hath so diligently told vs that Christ is delivered and receiued in the bread no othervvise then in the vvord Let him remember that P. Mattyr goeth one step farther assuring vs that Christ is better received and possessed by the word then by their signes oâ— bread and vvine vvhich assertion doth plainly folovv is rightly deduced out of the very principles of their doctrine in this point For vvhereas the possession of Christ vvhich vve have ether by the signe or by the vvord dependeth only of faith so the possessing of Christ more or lesse better or worse in greater degree or smaler is to be measured by our faith only if he vvil say that vve possesse Christ better by their signe of bread then by the word he must consequently say that such bread more then the vvord stirreth vp our faith tovvards Christ by which faith only vve possesse and take hold of him And vvhat man of common reason and vnderstanding vvil not be asnamed to say that he is more moved to beleeue Christs death resurrection by seeing a peece of bread broken vvhich is a dumb and dead ceremonie of it self signifieth nothing but is a like indiffereÌ„t to signifie a number of things as vvel Christs life as his death his ascension as his resurrection his incarnation and circâ—â—neisioÌ„ as wel as any of the former which bread therefore M. B. calleth truly a corruptible earthly dead element voyd of life and sowle what reasonable man I say vvil graunt that by such a dumb ceremonic he is more stirred vp to beleeue Christs passion then vvhen he heareth the same plainly and cleerly preached out of the holy Euangelists out of the vvord of god vvhich as S. Paule calleth it is the power of god working saluation to al that beleeue vvhich vvord is lively and forcible and more persing then a two-edged sword able to diuide euen the sowle and the spirite the ioynts and the marow and to discerne the intrinsecal cogitations and intents of the hart Is that blunt bread able to stirre vp our faith comparably to this tvvo-edged sword that dul earthly dead element more then this diuine creature so lively and forcible and persing as here by S. Paule it is described If to folovv M. B. ovvne reason comparison the bread vvithout the vvord be nothing but a common peece of bread and the word serues as it â—ere a sowle to quicken the whole action without vvhich the bread is nothing els but a dead element hovv can a common peece of bread broken by the minister though neuer so artificially geue vs a better holdfast a better grip a more ample possession of Christ theÌ„ the vvord of Christ vvhich is omnipotent and able to vvorke al and vvhich without diminution of his ovvne life imparteth to the bread al the life vvhich it hath Is bread the dead elemeÌ„t more effectual then the vvord vvhich is the sovvle that putteth life in to that dead element Can the body separated from the sovvle or opposed to the sovvle be said to haue more life and spirite then the sovvle vvhich is the only founteyne of life and spirite to the body and vvithout vvhich the body remayneth as voyd of al life and spirite as doth any stocke or stone Novv surely this is aâ—â—ry dead imagination not to be conceiued of a man that hath life and sense and a litle vvit in him I omit that Caluin P. Martyr and Zuinglius commonly vvrite that never vvas there nor is there any sacrament which exhibited or deliuered to vs Christ but al sacraments serve â—ther to signifie and figure Christ absent as Zuinglius wil haue it or to seale the communication of Christ and his promises receiued before as is the more vsual opinion of Caluin Beza Martir and those that be right Caluinists And therefore vvhat speaketh M. B. of better gripping Christ by the sacrament then by the word of possessing him more fully and largely by the sacrameÌ„ts then by the word vvhereas they teach that by the sacraments vve posseâ—â—â— him not nor grip him at alâ—as out of Calvin Musculus Bullinger Zuinglius hath bene sâ—evved VVherefore M. B. perceiuing belike of him self that tâ—â—â— his riddle or oracle of possessing Christ better by 〈◊〉 signe of bread drinke by vvhich vve possesse him 〈◊〉 thing at alâ—then by the word which vvorketh some possessioÌ„ of Christ vvithin vs could very hardly sinke in â—â— the minds of his auditorie he therefore from this 〈◊〉 â—â—th to the first old auncient grace of his sacramenâ— bread lest it should seeme altogether friuolous and â—â—â— profitable For the sacraments serue also saith he â—◠〈◊〉 vp and confirme the truth that is in the word For â—â—â—â— office of the seale hung to the euidence is not to confirme any other truth but that which is in the euidence suppose ye beleeved the euidence before yet by the seales ye beleeue it the better euen so the sacrament assures me of
so taught the new sacrifice of the new testament which the church receiuing from the Apostles doth offer to god through the whole world Of which sacrifice the prophete Malachie foreprophecied thus I haue no liking in yow saith our lord almightie nether wil I take sacrifice of your hand o ye Iewes because from the rising of the Sunne to the going doune of the same my name is glorified among the Gentils incense is offered to my name in euerie place and a pure sacrifice The same argument and dedustion I haue noted before out of S. Cyprianâ— First that Christ our lord and god him selfe was high priest of god the father and he first of al offered him selfe a sacrifice to his father â—â—â—â—s last supper and commaunded the same to be done in commemoration of him Next that such priests occupie the place of Chist truly who do that which Christ did and then in the church offer they to god the father true ful sacrifice if they so offer as they see Christ him selfe to haue offered About some 100. yeres after S. Cyprian vvas gathered the first general Councel of Nice and about a hundreth yeres after that of Nice vvas the first general Councel of Ephesus in vvhich the bishops there assembled thus vtter their faith that is the faith of the vniuersal catholike church in this matter The vvoids of that most auncient Apostolical Councel of Nice are On the diuine table let vs not basely regard the bread and cup set there but lifting vp our myndeâ— let vs by faith vnderstand that on that holy table is placed the lamb of god which taketh away the sinnes of the world who there is without effusion of blud sacrificed by the priests and that we truly receiue his preticus body and blud beleeuing these to be the pledges of our resurrection The vvords of the other general Councel of Ephesus are to the same effect thus VVe confessing the death of Christ according to his flesh his resurrection and ascension into heauen confesse withal and celebrate in the church the holy liâ—eâ—â—uing and vnbluddy sacrifice beleeuing that which is set before vs not to be the body of a common man like to vs as nether is that pretious blud but rather we receiue that as the proper body blud of the word which geueth life For common flesh can not geue life as him selfe witnesseth saying flesh profiteth nothing it is the spirite that geueth life For because it is made the proper flesh of the word for this reason it is lifegeuing according to that our Sauiour him selfe â—aith As my liuing father hath sent me I liue by the father he that eateth me he shal liue by me This faith I say of Sacrament sacrifice in al sinceritie simplicitie thus passed on so vniuersally knovven beleeued that as vvriteth S. Leo in Italie S. Augustin in Africa very children vvere taught to acknovvledge the true flesh and blud of Christ to be offered in the sacrifice of the masse Tovvards 800. yeres after Christ one Bertram a litle before him one Scot â—s vvrote darkly of the truth of this sacrament Of the vvritings of the one of these nothing I thinke remayneth of the other a litle doth but the same vttered so doubtfully that as the Zuinglians vse his authoritie against the Catholikes so the Lutherans vse him to the contrarie yea they in maner reproue him as fauoring to much the faith of the Catholikes For of him Illyricus vvith his bretherne say that he hath in that his litle booke semina transubstantiationis the seedes original ground of transubstantiation But vvhat soeuer his priuate opinion vvere his publike speaches and vvriting â—ounded soâ—il in the eares of the Catholiks of that age that Paschasius an Abbat in France made a verie learned booke in refutation of him And al vvriters vvho about that age vvrote of this mysterie vsed more expresly to denâ—e the sacrament to be a signe trope figure image symbole c. in such sort as vvhereby the veritie of the real presence might be excluded as appeareth in the seuenth general Councel in Alcuinus scholemaister to Charles the great in Rabaâ—â—â— archbishop of Ments lib. de diuinis officijs Theophilact in Matth. 26. Marc. 14. Ioan. 6. Aâ—alarius Arch-bishop of â—reuirs lib. de mysterijs missae cap. 24. 25. Haymo bishop of Halberstat in 1. ad Corinth ca. 10. Remigâ—ê° bishop of Antissiodorum in Canonem missae Fulbertus bisshop of Chartres in epistola ad Adelman episcopum in lib. Paschasij Stephanus bishop in high Buâ—gundie Tom. 4. bibliothâ—cae Sanctorum patrâ—m and briefely al other that vvrote betvvene the time of Bertram Berengarius ¶ For after Bertram the next that appeared in fauour of this heresie vvas Berengarius vvho put forth him self a little after the yere of our lord 1000. vvhen as S. Ihon vvriteth in his Apocalyps the deuil was let lose to trouble the church This man as vvitnesseth our martyr-maker M. Fox like to those first heretiks in the Apostles tymes toke away the veritie of the body blud of Christ from the sacrament For vvhich cause he coÌ„mendeth him as a singular instrument whom the holy ghost raised vp in the church to ouerthrow great errors VVhat instrument he vvas vvhom he serued shal best appeare by his ovvne behauiour confession In the meane season this old heresie he published vvith greater industrie shevv of learning then his predecessors countenanced it with more credit assistance of many vnstable sowles and sinful persons as is noted by the godly and learned writerâ— of that tyme vvhich only kind of men ioyned them selues to him and that because his doctrine seemed to yeld them some quietnes securitie in their sinne from vvhich they vvere much withdravven by a reuerend feare and dread vvhich they had of Christs presence in the sacrament to the receauing vvhereof they vvere by order of the church at certaine times induced But as the heresie of this man spread farther then any of that kind in any age before so the church vsed more diligence in repressing the same by sundry publike disputations had vvith the same Berengarius by a number of most excellent vvriters against him among vvhom Lanfâ—ancus archbishop of Canterbury in England Guitmundus bisshop of Auersa in the kingdom of Naples Algerus a monke in Fraunce in that verie time excelled the supreme pastors of the church assembled sundry great synodes meetings of byshops and other doctors to discusse that opinion instruct those that erred after him first at Tours in Fraunce next at Vercellis in Italie then againe at Tours vvhere Berengariê° him selfe being manifestly conuicted 〈…〉 a solemne oth neuer to maintaine his former heresie VVhich oth vvhen as yet he performed not but returned to his former filth an other Councel vvas gathered in Rome of 113.
illis and was â—â—edient to them and therefore somwhat esteemed them Before he tooke flesh of his mother he replenished her vvith al grace and made her blessed among al women vvith this prerogative that al Christian nations and generations vvhich vvere to be borne should ever honour her and account her for blessed in a singular sort Here vvas some esteeme of carnal cognation VVhen the Angel from God said to her Tâ—ow hast â—ound grace with God Ecce â—â—ncipies in vtero paries filiâ—â— behâ—ld thow shalâ— conceive in thy woâ—â—â— and beare a sonne accounting this verie conception and childbearing a great grace here vvas some reverence and regard of carnal band VVhen Christ hanging on the crosse in the extreme anguishes of death commended his mother to S. Iohn it vvas a signe he had some esteeme of her Briefly vvhereas he said in his law vvhich he gave to Moses Maledictuâ— qui non honoraâ— patrem suâ—â—â— matrem suaâ—â— Cursed is he shal esteemeâ—â— â—â—â—â—reth not his father mother vve may assure our selves that this is a cursed collection whereby this propnane minister gathereth out of Christs vvords that he honored not noâ— reverenced not esteemed his mother or the carnal band vvhich he had with her which if he had done or had bene ashamed of her he vvould sever have bene borne of her as noteth S. Chrysostom vpon that place of S. Matthew ¶ An other of his collections as good and Christian â—â— this foloweth in these vvords Saith not Christ him self Ihon 6. to draw them from that finister confidence that they had in his flesh only My flesh profiteth nothing it is only the spirite that quickens In these few vvords M. B. sheweth 2. or 3. very heretical trickes First in perverting the sense of this question like a Capernaite or Nestorian and drawing it to the flesh only as though vve reasoned of Christs flesh only to be geven in vulgar and grosse maner as the Capernaites imagined or as though we conceived it to be the only flesh of a man separated from the spirite Jivinitie the founteyne of life and so vnable to geve life vvhich vvas the sense and meaning of the Nestorians Next he plaieth an heretical part in geving to Christs words vvhat interpretation and meaning him self pleaseth expounding that of Christs only flesh vvhich the very drift circumstance of the place proveth not to be meant of Christs flesh or any flesh at al but only of fleshly and carnal vnderstanding of Christs spiritual vvords according to a common phrase of scripture For after these vvords The flesh profiteth nothing it foloweth immediatly The wordes that I haue spoken to yow are not flesh but spirite life But there are certaine of yow which beleeve not Therefore did I say to yow that no man can come to me vnles it be geven him of my father VVhich vvordes have this plaine and necessarie coherence My wordes are spirite and spiritually to be vnderstood and so geve they life They are not flesh nor to be vnderstood after a fleshly sort as do these Capernaites For so they are not life They are to be vnderstood comprehended by faith not by sense or reason which faith because yow want and folovv your sense and carnal conceites therefore yovv are offended at them So true that is vvhich I said to yovv that no man can come to me and in this sort eate my flesh except it be geven him of my father except my father draw him and illuminate his vnderstanding For flesh and blud hurnainâ— vvit discourse and intelligeÌ„ce can not reveale these matters but only my father vvhich is in heaven This is a plaine evident and true sense of Christs vvords and thus every part aptly ioyneth iustifieth one another vvhereas if in the first ye take flesh for Christs flesh the spirite for Christs spirite there vvil be made ether no sense or a very hard sense of the vvords folowing as the Christian reader by diligent conference of the place may perceive And thus the auncient fathers interprete the place S. Basil S. Chrysostom S. Austin Theophilact and others of vvhich S. Chrysostom to alleage one in steed of many as it vvere of purpose writing against M. B. The flesh profiteth nothing saith he Christ speaketh not this of his flesh Absit God defend we should so thinke but he speaketh of those who vnderstand his words carnally The flesh profiteth nothing is not meant of the flesh it self but of the fleshly vnderstanding And in the same place flesh fleshlynes here is spoken of them vvho make doubt move questioÌ„ Quomodo possit carnem su on nobis dare mandâ—candam Hoâ— Christ cangeve vs his flesh to eateâ— But Christâ— words are spirite and life that is are spiritual conteining no carnali ie or natural consequence in the maner of geving his flesh but are free from al earthly necissitie and the lawes of this life as declaring the true geving and receiving of his flesh to be after a divine mystical supernatural vvay The suÌ„marie sense of it is geven in these vvordes of S. Paule Animalis homo non percipit ea quae sunt spiritus the sensual and carnal man perceiveth not those things that are of the spirite of God for it is foolishnes to him he can not vnderstand them But the spirite of God it is vvhich revealeth them A third heretical part and the same vvorse then ether of these two is that he addeth to Christs vvords thereby most vvickedly corrupteth them Christs vvords are as he telleth vs It is the spirite only that quickens and my flesh profiteth nothing But vvhere hath Christ these words VVhere maketh Christ any such opposition betwene his flesh and the spirite VVhere saith he that it is the spirit only that quickens VVhat impudent sawcines vvickednes is this to thrust in of your owne this particle only and to ioyne it to the spirite thereby to take from Christs flesh al force and vertue of quickening vvhich Christ in this same chapter ascribeth to his fâ—esh most expressely Again VVhere saith Christ my fâ—eâ—â— profiteth nothing vvhat a vvicked and execrable and double iniquitie is this First to say that Christs flesh is vnprosirable and then to father this blasphemous â—â— truth vpon Christ him self Saith not Christ him â—â—â— again and again the cleane contrarie Saith he not a the chapiter by yow noted I am the living bread which came downe from heaven If any man eate of this bread he â—â—â— live for ever and the bread which I wil geue is my flesh â—â—â— I wil give for the life of the world Saith he not in the same place He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blud haâ—blâ— everlasting and I wil raise him vp in the last day Are â—â— these Christs owne vvords my flesh is meate in deed â—â— my blud is
est eos spectare ad manifestam in hoc articulo Apostastam And as it is croniâ—led by those that vvere present eye-vvitnesses Richerus vvhom Calvin sent from Geneva as an Apostle to preach his gospel in the nevv France ioyning to America among his Calvinists there preached the eating of Christs body to be peculiar and proper to the sowle as here M. B. teacheth for that hope of resurrection was only for the sowle and not for the body And being after convented examined vvhat he meant to preach so he ansvvered that he vvould stand to his preaching and iustifie it repeating againe this reason quia spes vitae non est corporum sed animarum for that the hope of eternal life apperteyneth not to the bodies but to the fowles Briefly one Pappus a Lutheran Doctor of Strasburg a dosen yeres since vvriting against Sturmius a Caluinist Rhetorike reader in the same citie rehearsing in fine the Caluinists Creed vvith this preface I wil saith he frind Starmius â—â— cite to thee the Creed of these Calvinists whom thow dost defend not as they protest openly in wordes but as their mind is and intention which also they vtter in their writing and â—â— not able to conceale in their familiar talke And beginning vvith Credo in Deum patrem multipotentem c. I beleev is God the father who can do many things c. vvhen he cometh to this article of the resurrection thus he vttereth it Credo noncarnis quae ad vitam non alitur nec sustintatur in sacra Eucharistia sâ—d animae tantum resurrectionem vitam aeternam I beleeve the resurrection and life eternal only of the sowle not of the flesh which is not â—ed and nourished iâ— the holy Eucharist to eternal life VVherevnto immediatly he adioyneth these vvords vvhich I vvish M. B. to coÌ„sider Here thoâ—r Sturmius wilt vse I doubt not al maner of exclamations and cryingâ— out against me But that skilleth â—â— For thow hast taught in thy Rhetorike that al such Rhetorical exclamations and amplifications are nothing but repetatio priâ—cipiâ— idâ—e repeating of that which is in question words and wind without matter OsteÌ„de si poâ—es si bonus es quicquam iâ— isto abominando blasphâ—mo Sâ—mbolo falso imputari ijs â—â—â—uÌ„â—u causam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 defendendaÌ„ suscepisti shew me if thow be able and if thow be a honest man anything in tâ—â— abominable and blasphemous Creed which is falsely attributed to these Calvinists whoâ—e cause thow a wicked râ—etor ciâ—â— hast taken vpon thee to defend These vvords touch M. B. to the quicke For his preaching as directly tendeth to denial of the Creed and namely this article as lightly may be â—ound in any other of his false bretherne be they Calvinists never so pure and zealous ¶ One more collection and this shal be the last to like effect as the former that is to disgrace al corporal communication vvith Christ he maketh in these vvordes So it is that never no mâ—n was better for carnal tuitching iâ— Christ As the woman troubled with the bluddy issue vpon thâ—â— persuaâ—â—on that Christ may cure both body and sowle she coâ—es to him and as the text sais she preases through the multitude til she come to him and when she comes to him it is not said that she tuitched his flesh with her hand in case the Papistes would ascribe the vertue which came out of him to her carnal tuitching O how careful this man is to vvithdraw al vertue from the flesh of Christ and real tuitching thereof but it is said she tuitched only the hem of his garment and with faith which is the hand of the sowle she tuitched Christ Hereof he concludeth To let yow vnderstand that she tuitched him by faith he saith to her Go thy way thy faith hath saued thee She tuitched him not so soone by faith but incontinent there comes a power out of him So that this tuitching of him hath ever bene is and shal be profitable as the corporal tuitching of Christ never was profitable is not nor neuer shal be profitable These vvords as the Christian reader may easely see tend to evacuate and disanul most of Christ and his Apostles actions here in this vvorld If he had said that faith vvas requisite in those that songht to Christ for helpe as Christ him self teacheth like as the phisicion of his patient requireth credit and obedience that he trust him obey him before he vvil vndertake to cure him he had spoken like a Christian and like a true preacher and one that had a litle marked the scriptures vvhereof they talke so much and for ought may appeare vnderstand so litle But to attribute al to the faith of the partie and to vvithdraw it from al other actions vnto which it is as properly yea more properly due this is dishonorable to Christ and quit besides yea against the vvhole storie of the Gospel Christ coming in to the vvorld and preaching amonge the Iewes for this end that he might plant his faith amongest them ever vrged them to this faith required of them this faith vvithout this faith seeldom did any miracles somtimes as the EuaÌ„gelists expresle the matter could not do miracles in some places because the people vvere so ful of vnbeleefe and incrudelitie for that it vvas against Gods ordinarie providence Christs vvisdome to shevv his miraculous power vvhere men vvere bent to contemne mocke and laugh at him rather then take benefite by him among vvhich people to have shevved forth any such divine operatioÌ„ had bene nothing els then to have vvatered a dead tree aud sowed corne in the sand or vpon a rocke For this reason Christ so commenly required faith as being a qualitie necessarie to make men capable of his grace and benediction other temporal or spiritual Yet the vâ—ne storie of the gospel in the same place noted by M. B. sundry the like prove other things as coming to Christ praying requesting perseverance charitie c. to have bene as requisite as such credulitie and to have coÌ„ curred as effectually to the obteyning of such graces as did this faith or good opinion of Christs person Fâ—â— that by the vvay let the reader marke that the faith here and in like places coÌ„mended is not the Catholike faith of Christians vvhich vve vniversally professe in Christs Church much lesse the Protestant faith or solisidian coÌ„ ceit or rash presumption of their particular iustificatico and remission of sinnes but only a reverend opinion persuasion that Christ as a blessed man and prophete vvas of abilitie to do such things And thus Christ him self describeth this faith in diuers places namely and most expressely in S. Matth. VVhere two blind men crying on him to have their sight Christ called them vnto him and said to them Do yow beleeve that I can do this vnto you
and such like it may be answered in his behalf that to require of him or any other of his profession to make their doctrine ech part agreable to other in places so far distant is vnreasonable and against the tenor and qualitie of their gospel vvhich euermore varieth and altereth VVhich libertie also M. B. closely insinuateth and chalengeth to him self in these Sermons vvilling his auditors in the second of them to take this for the present vntil he have more insight in these matters and it appeareth his insight vvas more in the 4. and 5. Seâ—mons then it vvas in the third I omit also vvhich yet is very markable and diligently to be noted that for al these blind contrarie assertions he stil alleageth scripture as vvel for one part as the other That faith is lost by evil life he proveth by scripture That faith is never lost by any meanes he proveth at large and more abundantly by scripture That faith is a substantial ground an assurance and certaine pâ—rsuasion without al doubting he proveth by S. Paul That faith may stand vvith doubting looke to the Apostle saith M. B. the Apostle saith we always are in doubt but we despaire not For vvhich text refeiring it to faith as he doth that we always are in doubt of our faith or any part thereof vve may looke for it in the Apostle til our eyes be out and never find it That the holy ghost can not abide and remayne in a sinful sowle is proved by scripture That the holy ghost never departeth from the elect commit they sinnes never so fowle and filthy for this also he alleageth scripture and so forth for the rest that faith is ever vvorking wel by charitie sometimes not vvorking wel c. scriptures especially S. Paul is ever at hand to iustifie al. ¶ But the most absurd and grosse contrarietie is that he maketh the very frame body of his discourse plaine repuguant to his beginning ending he setteth as it vvere the head feet of a horse to the body of a man as though he vvould protest him self to be of the number of those of vvhoÌ„ the Apostle speaketh They covet to be taken for doctors of the law and preachers of the gospel vvhereas they vnderstand nether what things they speake nor whereof they affirme For what is his discourse in these 2. Sermons touching preparation Forsooth that to the vvorthy receiving of the Lords supper is required preparation vvhich conteynes many parts that the communicant have true faith in Christ love God love his neighbour pray be merciful bring forth good fruits glorisie God in vvord and deed be sorie for sinne coÌ„mitted â—heretofore diligently eschew it for the tyme to come hate sinne and also have sorow for it For it is not inough to hate it if thow lament not the committing of it and with a godly sorow deplore it vvherein he speaketh like a Papist or Catholike not like a Gospelling Protestant this being flat against the common vvriting of his maisters Luther Calvin Musculus Melanchton Beza c. yea against his owne Scottish communion booke For it was one of Luthers capital articles condemned by the Romane See and after stubbornely mainteined by him and his sectaries as an article most true Christian and godly plane manifeste Christianissimus that such contrition and lamenting for sinne as here M. B. commendeth maketh one an hipocrite yea a greater and more grevous sinner before God facit hypocritam imo magis peccatorem and the Scottish communion booke speaking of this verie point saith that the Lord requireth no other worthines on our part lut that we vrfaynedly ackowlege our naughtines and imperfection briefly and in summe the person that vvould vvorthely receive the supper must trie his conscience in these 2. points first to know whether it beat peace with God secondly whether it be in love charitie and amitie with his neighbour This preparation vvhich thus in these last Sermons he most prosequuteth may seeme both to incite his auditors to great holynes and to make others suppose that he hath a verie divine and high opinion of their supper to the receiving vvhereof such great preparation is required But vvilt thow see good reader al this overthrowen in one sentence Marke his first proposition in the first page of these last Sermons wherein he avoweth preparation to be always at al times as wel necessarie for hearing the siwple word as for receiving the visible sacrament and like preparatioÌ„ requisite for the one as for the other For so he foloweth on vvith his discourse The Apostle in the words that we have read 1. Cor. 11. v. 28. gives his commaund that we should not come to the table of the Lord we should not come to the hearing of the word rashly but with reverence we should prepare and sanctifie our selves in some measure VVith the same conclusion he shutteth vp both these sermons thus speaking in the last leaf Thus ye see in what points every of yâ—w ought to be prepared Ye man be indâ—ed with loue â—aith if ye haue these in any smal measure go baldly to the hearing of the word and receiving of the sacrament VVhy Siâ—is this the vvay to make your auditors to amend them selves their life and maners or to engender iâ— them reverence towards the supper to tel them that like preparation is required for hearing the simple vvord as for receiving the sacrament To leâ— rest for a vvhile the grosse absurditie and vile consequence vvhich dependeth hereon lâ—â— vs first learne vvhere yow find this kind of Theologie Yow answere The Apostle in the words which yow have read to your auditors 1. Cor. 11. ver 28. interpones his counsel and geves advise and not only that but also geves his admonition and commaund that we should not come to the table of the lord we should not come to the hearing of the word rashly but with reverence c. Let vs consider the text in the Apostle The place by yow quoted is this according to the translation of Calvin and Beza Let every one try him self and so eate of that bread and drinke of that cup. For who so eateth and drinketh vnworthely eateth and drinketh to himself damnation for that he discerneth not the lords body VVhere find yow here that a man must come vvith such reverence as yow tel vs of to heare the word Yea vvhere find yow the vvord mentioned at al ether in that verse or in the vvhole chapter VVhat grosse impietie corruption is this to publish so vvicked vnreasonable pestilent doctrine then to father it on the blessed Apostle and namely in this place vvhere it is most repugnant to the vvhole drift of the Apostles atgumeÌ„t VVhat one I vvil not say of the Apostles or primitive fathers and auncient Doctors but vvhat man indued vvith any meane learning
of his blud the bread there broken is the participation of his body should also be partakers of the table sacrifice of deuils In which argument albeit the Apostle being brief and writing to Christians whom he accounteth skilful wei instructed in this thing by mentioning litle signifieth more setting downe one part willeth them to vnderstand the whole as Calvin also truly noteth and therefore vseth not in everie part of his comparison the terme of altar and sacrifice yet as otherwhere he acknowledgeth the Christians to haue a true altar to sacrifice on and consequently a sacrifice from which the Iewes were debatredâ— so here the very drift of his reason exact correspondence of ech part to other require that as the Iewes had an altar a sacrifice so had the Gentils so had the Christians As the Iewes offered to their god so did the Gentils to their false god so did the Christians As the Iewes by that seruice were partakers of the worship of the true god so were the Gentils by the like seruice concluded conuinced to worship a false god that is the deuil therefore could not haue any part or coÌ„munion in the worship of the true god which was performed by the dreadful sacritice of Christs body blud among Christians VVhich triple sacrifice that of the Gentils to the deuil these two of the Iewes Christians to the true god S. Chrysostom veâ—v we observeth writing vpon the same place His words are In the old testament Pagans idolaters offered the blud of beasts to their idols This blud god tooke to him selfe that so he might turne away his people from committing idolatrie which was a great signe of infinite loue But here in the new testament he provided a sacrifice far more wonderful excellent both in that he changed the sacrifice withal in place of beasts killed in sacrifice he coÌ„maunded him selfe to be offered And this to be the true sense of the place Vib. Regius ioynt-Apostle with M. Luther in preaching this new gospel whom the Protestants of Germanie acknowlege cal a perfite absolute Diuine of infinite learning the Evangelist cheef Superintendent of the churthes of Christ in the Duchie of Luneburge as Luther was in the Duchie of Saxonie plainely graunteth Many there are saith he which thinke a sacrifice to be proued by the Apostle 1. Cor. 10. where he dehorteth from the societie of such as sacrifice to idols by arguments taken from the faith of the sacrifice vsed by the Iewes Gentils For he seemeth to compare sacrifice to sacrifice as Chrysostome teacheth his comparison so to stand that by it is gathered Christians in the Lords supper to haue a certaine peculiar sacrifice whereby they are made partakers of our lord as the idolaters by their abominable sacrifice are made partakers of deuils VVhich if it be so me seemeth it may be answered that in the supper of Christians are the body blud of Christ which are a holy sacrifice but coÌ„memoratiue sacrosanctum sunt sacrificium sed memoriale By which later word albeit he thinketh to haue answered the Catholiks excluded the truth of the sacritice yet is he much deceiued therein For so far are Catholiks from denying the sacrifice to be commemoratiue that of al other sacrifices which euer were or can be imagined we graunt this to be moste coÌ„memoratiue as which most neerely liuely truly expresseth the verie condition efficacie nature of that sacrifice offered on the crosse with which being one in substance it differeth only in maner of offering generalitie of redemption And as Christs transfiguration on the holy mount before his passion vvas the best most persite sigure examplar representation of that eternal glorie which the same person of Christ vvas to enioye in heauen after his resurrection ascension in like maner vve are to iudge of this mistical coÌ„memoratiue sacrifice in respect of his sacrifice on the crosse yet not excluding the veritie of Christs presence in one place more then the other Nether is there any reason vvhy Vrbanus Regius a Lutheran should imagine the sacrifice to be disproued for that it is a memorial or done in coÌ„memoration of Christ more then the real presence is disproued reiected because that also in the Lutheran religion must needs be done in coÌ„memoration Christs vvords being most plaine do this in coÌ„memoration of me VVhich vvords doubtles haue no more strength to overthrovv remoue a sacrifice of Christs body as al Catholikes vrge then a true presence of the same body vvhich al LutheraÌ„s graunt So that out of these vvords of the Apostle is confirmed the mistical sacrifice that it vvas vsually frequented in the first Apostolical church vvhich rec aâ—ed directly from Christ and his Apostles the order administration thereof ¶ This sincere sound beleefe concerning both sacrifice sacrament continued in the catholike church for the first thousand yeres almost vvithout contradiction of any man or sect vvorth the naming Only as our Sauiour him self in the veâ—ie beginning vvhen he first promâ—seâ— that the bread which he would geue should be the same flesh which he was to geue for the life of the world signified obscurely that Iudas the traytour certaine other for want of faith vvere scandalized at his vvords repâ—neâ— at them so a fevv veres after it may be gathered that some there vvere of Iudas folovvers vvho likevvise denyed the truth of this heauenly mistery vvhereof S. Ignatius scholer to the postles vvriteth thus as his vvords are recorded by Theodoretus Some sectaries there are who like not nor approue the oblâ—â—ions sacrifiâ—e◠〈…〉 〈…〉 〈…〉 〈…〉 for that they acknowledge not the Eucharist to be the flesh of our Sauiour Christ Iesu the selfe same flesh that suffred for our sinneâ— which the father of his merciful goodnes raised from death But vvhat these men vvere vvhat svvay they bare vvhat scholers they had appeareth not by any ecclesiastical record therefore belike vvere sone put to silence in that happie time of our primitiue first faith vvhen the Apostles them selues and many by them instructed had the governement of the church VVherefore the beleefe first taught by Christ and his Apostles proceded on from hand to hand from age to age vvithout any notable resistance VVhereof being a thing at large treated proued in sundry bookes both latin and english set forth of late I vvil bring only thre or fovver testimonies but the same most auncient S. Ireneus bishop of Lyons in Fraunce martyr S. Cyprian bishop of Carthage in Africa a martyr likevvise and the first general Councels of Nice Ephesus in Asia S. Ireneus vvriteth thus Christ taking bread gaue thankes said This is my body and that which was in the chalice he confessed to be his blud and
as these men forsooth haue taken it euen at Christs owne hands and that is that 3. or 4. of the bretherne go together take bread blesse it and geue it one to an other without vsing any farther ceremonie or words of Christ or consecration But here arise 3. or 4. great difficulties One whether there must necessarily be other meate and prouision besides the bread of the Eucharist as was at this supper whence these men take the paterne of their coÌ„munion A second how it wil stand with the sinceritie of their gospel to blesse the bread which blessing they so generally detest the English and Scottish coÌ„munion bookes refuse a late English Doctor in a large treatise hath condemned as superstitious wicked magical which words truly must needs proceede from a very prophane and Paganical hart mouth considering that Christ our Sauiour him self vsed it as here these martyrs tel vs. Thirdly which perhaps is greatest of al how they can frame their coÌ„munion by this paterne where is no mention of drinke And very probable coniecture there is that Christ vsed none for that as here the storie is rehearsed after Christ had deliuered them the bread their eyes were opened Christ forthwith vanished out of their sight And ioyne for a fourth that if the breaking of this bread were but breaking of common bread as our M. Iewel wil haue it an act of hospitalitie then foloweth it that the paterne whereby they frame out their communion teacheth them a coÌ„munion of such common bread as is vsed at euerie hosterie at euerie Inne and ale-house therefore they can not with reason blame Catholikes if they make no more esteeme of it But how soeuer this â—al out M. Fox with his Martyrs proceedeth oh wil needs proue that as Christ in the place before noted so his Apostles had no other communion nor ministred it in any otherwise For it foloweth Here also it seemeth to me the Apostles to folow their maister Christ to take the right vse of the Sacrament also to teach it to those that were converted to Christ as mention is made in the Acts of the Apostles where it is said They continued in the Apostles doctrine felowship in breaking of bread and prayer they did breake bread in euerie howse c. By al which he laboreth to perswade that the Institution of Christ as it is described by the Euangelists Matth. 26. Marc. 14. Luc. 22. should quit be remoued from the administration of the supper and only bread broken by the minister VVhich if he do and withal tel pronounce to the coÌ„municants the Lords death he maketh vnto them a persite and absolute supper according as these men haue receiued it at the Lords owne hands And the verie same ministration of the supper I fynd practised by the Scottish martyrs as writeth their friend and patâ—â—â—â— Bucâ—aâ—an About the yere 1545. one George Seâ—â—â—carde was aâ— S. Andrewes to be burnt VVhen the day of execution came the keeper of the castle and his seruants ready to go to breakfast asked George whether it would please him to take part with them He answered he would with a very good wil. But first quoth he I request yow to sitte downe here at the table with me and geue me leaue to make yow a short collation that I may pray vpon the bread which as brethren in Christ 〈◊〉 to eate so bid yow farewel In the meane season the table was couered bread being set on George began to entreate shortly plainely of Christs supper his paynes and death about halfe an hower Then he exhorted them especially to mutual loue that they wold become perfite members of Christ who continually prayeth to his father for vs that our sacrifice may with him be auayleable to life euerlasting VVhen he had thus spoken and yelded thanks to god he brake a lâ—fe of bread reached to euerie one a peece of it and likewise wine after him self had drunke a litle prayed them al that now with him in this Sacrament they would remember the death of Christ Afterward saying grace he retyred him self in to his chamber By these examples we learne how the communion is rightly ministred namely without al words of Christs Institution only that bread be divided among the bretherne and sisterne they willed to loue one an other and remember the Lords death VVhich seemeth generally to be the forme of the coÌ„munion among the Zuinglians in Suizzerland For as Zuinglius him selfe and Bullinger his successor rehearse the maner of it The people â—it al a long in order vpon formes and geue â—are to one who readeth to them the 13. chapter of S. Iohns gospel In the meane season is bread caried about in baâ—keâ—s or paâ—iaâ—s and wine in glasses One man geueth bread to an other likewise of the wine Thus endeth this coÌ„munion or Sacrament of the supper as Zuinglius termeth it And Musculus earnestly disputing against S. Chrysostom for that he attributed great force to the words of Christ by vvhich there is made in the Sacrament a sanctification alteration far surpassing the power of man as S. Chrysostom thought among other things thus reproueth him It is not needful that Christ should now againe sanctifie by a second repetition that which once for al he hath sanctified by the deed word of his Institution For that Institution once done hath sanctified the Sacramental signes for the churches vse euen to the end of the world And that being once done by him is of force through al churches to the worlds end without any other repetition or iteratâ—on thereof Once for al he said This is my body This cuppe is the new testameÌ„t in my blud Do this in remembrance of me and by these words once for al he instituted sanctified this ceremonie turned the bread from a natural vse to a Sacramental By which words especially conferred vvith those of Bullinger and Zuingliê° before rehearsed the practise of that church a man may perceiue that al these English Scottish Geneuian and Suizzer Protestantes agree in remouing Christs vvords from the supper and accompt the supper very sufficiently gospellike administred if the brethern diuide bread drinke amoÌ„ng them selues in memory of Christ without any nevv mentioning of his institution vvhich being once done by him selfe serueth for al without any more a do or new repetition of the same And this is the very exact forme of the Scottish coÌ„munion or supper now in practise as hereafter shal be declared ¶ Here before I end this chapiter I thinke it good to informe the reader of the resolution of the church of Geneua about the matter of this Sacrament for that of the forme we haue sufficient knowledge by this which hath bene said hitherto Concerning the matter this is the determination of that
and therefore the Lutheran churches of the Counts of Mansfeld in Germanie in the Confession of their faith put a great difference betwene the old Sacramentaries the new saying that the old Sacramentaries that is the Carolostadians the Zuinglians the Anabaptists and such like alwaies taught the Sacrament of the altar to be nothing else but an external idle signe without the body and blud of Christ that it serued only for a token to distinguish Christians from Pagans whereas the new teach otherwise and Caluin to continue and mainteine such a conceite of al other seemeth to speake of this matter most diuinely and mystically and with straunge affectation of high speach may make vnlearned and vnstable sowles beleeue that he hath a wonderful deepe fetch in this case aboue the rest of common ministers writers whom M. B. in these sermons much foloweth yet who so thoroughly fifteth and examineth Caluin shal find in the end that he hath no other opinion of their supper then hath Carolostadius or Zuinglius or Occolampadius or the Anabaptists or the Scottish and English martyrs or who else so euer thinketh of it most basely and beggerly For let vs by articles consider how he runneth vp and downe praiseth dispraiseth maketh and marieth it at one time mounteth alost flieth in the ayer like a bird straight waies creepeth on the ground like a beast but in â—ine falleth headlong in to the coÌ„mon dongeon with the rest of his bretherne and whether in deed the very course and sway of their whole doctrine carieth them At some times he speaketh and writeth so supernaturally as though he were a very Lutheran defending the real presence as for example I say saith Caluin that in the mysterie of the supper by the signes of bread and wine Christ is truly deliuered vnto vs I meane his body and blud to the end we may grow in to one body with him he thereby refresh vs with the eating of his flesh and drinking of his blud And although it may seeme vncredible that in so great distance of places as is heauen from earth he should passe downe to vs and become our food yet let vs remember how far the power of the holy ghost excedeth our sense and how fond a thing it is for vs to go about to measure his infinite power by our smale capacitie VVherefore that cur mynd or reason can not comprehend let our faith conceiue VVhat Lutheran wold require more then here Caluin coÌ„fesseth Or what more pregnant and effectual words can be desired to declare the veritie of Christs real presence not in figure trope or signification which wit and reason can castly comprehend but truly verely so as Christ I say Christs body and blud notwithstanding so great distance of place as is betwene the highest heauen this low vale is here truly deliuered by the inexplicable force and strength of the holy ghost which only is able to worke such a miraculous coniunction Againe If any man demaund of me how this is done I am not ashamed to confesse the mysterie to be higher then that I can ether comprehend it with my wit or declare it with my tonge to speake the truth I rather find it by experience then vnderstand it Therefore the truth of god wherein I may safely rest here I embrace without scruple He pronounceth his flesh to be the meate of my sowle and his blud the drinke To him I offer my sowle to be nourished with such foode In his holy supper he willeth me vnder the symboles of bread and wine to take eate and drinke his body and blud I nothing dout but he truly geueth it and I receiue it And that his meaning is Christs true body to be not sigâ—â—atâ—uely or tropically but most really and truly present vvith the bread he expresseth in his litle booke De caena domini by an apt similitude ExempluÌ„ valde propriuÌ„ in re simili habeâ—â—u c. VVe haue a maruelouâ— apt example in a like matter VVhen the Lord wold that the holy ghost should appeare in the baptisme of Christ â—e represented him vnder the figure of a doue Iâ—â—n Baptist rehearing the storie saith that he saw the holy ghost descending If we consider the matter wel we shal fynd that â—e saw nothing but a douâ— For the essence of the holy ghost iâ— inuisible Yet because he wel knew that vision to be ro emptie figure but a most sure signe of be â—resence of the holy ghost â—e doubteth not to affirme that â—e saw him because he was represented or made present in such sort as he could beare So in the communion of Christs body blud the mysterie is spiritual which nether can be seene with eyes nor comprehended bâ— mans wit Therefore is it shewed by signes figures yet so that the figure is not a simple bare figure but ioyned to his veritie aâ—d â—â—stance Iustly therefore is the bread called the body of Christ because it doth not only figure it but also present or offer it vnto vs. This is a plain declaration that novv Caluin vvil not separate Christs body from the Sacrament as far as heauen is from earth but ioyne it thereto as truly as the holy ghost vvas to that doue vvhere he vvas vvithout doubt present truly really substantially And this being so is it not a great shame vv â— some say to charge Caluin and the Caluinists vvith contempt of the Sacrament and to say that they haue no other opinion of it then Zuinglius Carolostadius and those other forenamed Protestants Doubtles so he complaineth The aduersarie slaunder â—e â— â—aith Caluin that I measure this mysterie with the squire of humaine reason and gods power by the course of nature But who so euer shal tast our doctrine herein shal be rapt into admiration of gods secrete to ver VVe teach that Christ descendeth vnto vs as wel by the external signe as by the spirite that the flesh of christ entreth in to vs to be our foode that Christ truly with the substance of his flesh and blud doth geue life to our sowles In the e few words who so perceiveth not many miracles to be â—onteâ—â—ed is more then a dolt These words and other to the same effect are common with â—aluin as that the symbole doth not only signifie râ— figure but truly also deliuer the thing which it figureth that it bath the veritie which it signifieth conioâ—ned with it vere exhibet quod figuraâ— adiunctam secum habet veritateâ— Vbi signum est ibi res signata vere exbibetur VVhere the signe is there also the thing signified thereby is truly deliuered Nether must we suppose the signe to be destiâ—uâ—e of the truth signified except we wil make god a deâ—eâ—uer â—or true it is and we must needs confesse that the sacrament compriseth the visible signe
by like reason any baptisme vsed in the law were but â—gâ—â—â—â—ue in waâ—er alone yet the baptisme of Christ brought with it the holy ghost it gaue remission of synneâ— and therefore to there that were otherwiâ—e faithful beleeuing beâ—â—â—â—s their faith and beleef baptisme was neâ—eâ—â—aâ—â— for remission of their sâ—nnes eternal life For which cause it is called the holy ghosts lauer or font of regeneration and râ—â—â—uation By iâ— the word of life we aâ—â—cle â—nâ—ed from synne and siued as 〈…〉 â—â—uly as Neâ— and his â—aâ—â—â—lâ—e was sauâ—â— by the Arke and water supporting it in the time of the vniuersal deluge Al which promises and testimonies so plaine and preguant other to 〈…〉 as Calâ—â—â— Zuinghus Musculus and others do with flat denyal that by vertue of baptisme any such matter as grace remission is bestowed on vs or to elude by interpreting al thâ—â— to be spoken only for that baptisme is a signe or marke to â—estife the Lords wil vnto vs is to make a â—est of al scâ—â—pture nothing being so cleare but in this â—ort and with this audacitie may be shifted of or els to expound al these teâ—ts so that nothing be leaft singular to the new testament aboue the old this is plainly to disgrace and deface Christ with his new testament This is to match Moyses with Christ the servaÌ„t with his maâ—ster quit to destroy this new testameÌ„t whose essence coÌ„â—isteth in this differeth from that for that the old law coÌ„teyned shodowes signes prefigurations the grace veritie whereof was fulfilled in Christ Iesus That was a law of secuitude because it found meÌ„ sinners left the in then sinne occasionally encreased heaped synne vpon synne by no meanes of the lavy deliuered men from the burden of synne and therefore is called a TestameÌ„t in the letter which killeth not in the spirite which geueth â—â—fe the ministerie of death damnation because for the â—â—â—son a sore said it was a greater cause of death damâ—â—ion where as this is the law of freedom lâ—l ertie especialy for that it setteth men free from their sinnes hath old naâ—â—e meanes to abolish sinnes when they are committed and to pouregrace into men whereby they may absteyne from committing sinne and therefore is called a nevv Testament in the spirite which geueth life not in the letter which killeth the ministerie of the Spirite and iustice because it maketh men iust holy by conferring grace in her sacrifice and sacraments vvhereas in those other of the lavv was nothing els but a perpetual commemeratioÌ„ of synne once committed without forgeuing putting away or abolishing the same Al which difference the Apostle sammatilie compriseth when as comparing these two Testaments together he coÌ„cludeth that the nevv Testament standeth and is grounded on better promises then the old which out of the prophete Ieremie he noteth to be these In the new testament I wil geue my lawes into theirs mynds and in their hart wil I write them and not in tables of stone as before and I wil be mercyful to their iniquities and their synnes I wil not new remember which in the old testament vvere neuer forgotten but by the very sorme of then seruice remembred perpetually ¶ But to dravv to a conclusion of that vvhich I purpose that is to make plaine and manifest the true nature of the Eucharist after Caluins faith and the faith of such congregations as are erected grounded vpon his Apostolical ministerie and vvithal to demonstrate where to this gospel tendeth that is to a very abnegation of Christianisme establishing in place thereof Iudaisme or some worser thing let vs in this principal mysterie coÌ„sider wel hovv they forsaking Christ and his Apostles forsaking the Apostolical primitiue church of al fathers martyrs the beleef vse of this SacrameÌ„t practised amongest them haue taken their Supper from the Ievves from a Iewish ceremonie vsed amongest the Ievves before Christs coming It is recorded by good historiographers that Berengarius was thought to haue bene instructed in this point of his insidelitiâ— â—y a certain Iew and that al his argument vvhich he made against the truth of Christs presence in the sacrament vvere borowed and taken from Iosephus Albo a Iew a capital enemie of Christian name and religion For that Iew chap. 2â— of his 3 oration which he wrote concerning the points of Moyses law vâ—â—ereâ—h the self same arguments against the Eucharist which afterwards Berengarius his sectaries cast forth Eadem omnino dicit que BereÌ„garius se tatores eâ—uâ— pâ—stea vomueruÌ„t Beza out of Emanuel Tremell us the Ievv telleth that among the Iewes it vvas a custome yerely vvhen they did â—ate their paschal lamb vvithal to ioyne a ceremonial eating of bread and drinking of vvine in this sort The good maÌ„n of the house in the beginning of supper taketh an vnleauened loaf which he diuiâ—eth in two parts and blesseth the one with these words Blessed art thow O lord our god king of al things which out of the earth doest bring forth bread The other part of the loaf â—e â—â—uereth with a napkin and reserueth Then â—al they to their supper merily which being ended the good man taketh out that part of bread which was couered and sitting downe eateth so much as is the quantitie of an oliue distributeth the like to al that sit with him in memorie of their passe ouer Then sitting stil in like order he drinketh and saith the ordinarie grace c. This Ievvish ceremonie I make choise of to compare vvith the Caluinian Supper principally for that both in matter and forme al circumstances it resembleth the Calâ—inian deuise most aptly but partly also that vvithal I may shevv to the reader the incredible â—rovvardnes and peruersitie of Caluin and Beza vvho vvhen they haue equalled al sacraments and ceremonies of the lavv vvith those of the gospel yet forsooth for honour of their ovvne inuention can not abide to haue their peeuish supper called a Ievvish ceremouie or coÌ„pared vvith any such vvhereaâ— Caluin stoâ—meth maruelously Beza in the place before quoted vvheÌ„ he hath likened the one to the other very diligently in fine as though he bare some special reuerence to his ovvne supper addeth by vvay of correction Longe â—amen aliter iudicandum est de hac sancta solemni c. yet must we iudge fâ—â— other wise of this holy and solemne institution of the supper as it is set forth by Ihon Caluin and the church of Geneua whereby we are put in possession of Christ then of thâ—â— external rite humane traditioÌ„ Thus Beza most foÌ„dly frovvardly For what more peevish frovvardnes can be imagined then that they vvho against Christ his Apostles and al scripture haue altogether made equal our Testament with the Ievvish our sacraments vvith theirs ouâ— Eucharist with
the 〈◊〉 also thereof both which the Iewes vâ—â—d nâ—their solemne paschal ceremonie And this bread and drink without any consecration or sanctification or alteration other then vvas vseâ— among the Ievves saue only that it should eâ—â—e for a signe of a thing novv passed as before it signified the same to come he made according to these mens doctrine the sacramental bread of the nevv testament So that if no â—vve can orderly as hath bene declared procced by legrecâ— first to remoue from the sacrament the true body and blud of Christ and leaue yet a real qualitie vertue derived thenge then to take avvay that real qualitie descend to a spiritual eating only by faith and make no other presence of Christ in the supper then in hearing a sermon or reading a chapiter of some good booke after to take aâ—â—aâ— that also make the supper to serue only for a seale and testimonie that vve haue receiued Christ by faith in the next place to make the supper a bare signe of Christs body and finally a mere â—â—vviâ—h ceremonie causing vs to remember the Messias â—ovv fistene hundred yeres since incarnate â—â— the Ievves communion put them in mind of the same Messias who was to be incarnate many yeres after it besides specially and principally we haue a singular rega◠〈◊〉 vvith the Scholemen Catholikes we imagine not any secrete vertue to be hid or annexed to this 〈…〉 bread no more then vvas in that breaâ— of the Ievves or is novv in other common bread vseâ— at the vulgar suppers of religious Caluinists vvho in their suppers and dinners thinke of Christs death then come vve nigh to haue a right apprehension and concene of 〈…〉 communion And to this very conclusion as the vvhole doctrine of Calâ—m and the right sacramentaties tendeth so Z 〈…〉 us Prince of the sacramentaries vvhich excellent mans doctrine vvas ever agreable to Caluins concerning the sacraments expresseth the same in most plain and â—lat termes For speaking of the first sacrament of baptisme vvhich â—e calâ—â—tâ— the chief and principal signe of the new testament VVhaâ— is â—aith heâ— the condition and vertue thereof Iohn declareth Matth. 3. I baptise yow in water to repentance Iohn taught them to amend their liues and to repent And whâ—â—râ—â—eâ—ued his preaching these he marked with the external element of water nec tamen iâ—circo aliqua ex parte melâ—â—res eraÌ„â—â— and yet for their baptisme they were neuer a whit the better For what let was there but that they might haue repented as wel without baptisme Therefore baptisme is only a ceremonie and signe c. And in the next leaâ—e The baptisme of the Apostles was al one with that of Iohn For they also as wel as Ihon gaue nothing elsâ—buâ— the external signe of baptisme â—uapropter illorum quoque baptismis non â—â— uâ—fuit quam signaâ— purâ—daÌ„ initta e externâ—â—remonia VVherefore their baptisme also waâ— nothing els but a certain entring signe and external ceremonie And a litle after It was a great error of the old Doctors that they supposed the external water of baptisme to be of any valew towards the purging of sinne For it is most assured that the external baptisme in water is of no force or vâ—eâ— to the cleansing of our sowles And therefore this veâ—â— baptisme vvhereof the Doctors make â—o great a matter is nothing els but a ceremonie I meane an external signe whereby a man professeth that he wil now folow Christ Al which in his ansvvere to Luthers confession he applieth in like maner indifferently to the Eucharist and to the sacraments of the old lavv For this saith he is the office of every sacrameÌ„t that it signifieth only c. So did circuÌ„cifioÌ„ so â—â—â— the paâ—châ—l lamb So baptisme maketh not men the sonnes of god but these which before were the sonnes of god receiue by baptisme a testimonie a signe or badge thereof the like iâ— dâ—ne in â—he supper of Christ Yea this he reckeneth for so suâ—e a principle that of the two he thinketh the sacrameÌ„ts of Christs gospel more voyd of al spiritual grace and vertue to sanctifie then those of the old lavv For so he disputeth Iâ— in the old Testament the carnal and external sacrament could not bring any puritie or cleanesse to sinâ—ul and deâ—iled consciences how much lesse can such sacraments do vâ— any like profite in Christ in the new testament where only the spirite geueth life and worketh al ¶ Against al which if perhaps the good reader thinke that in Bezaes words before cited there is some secrete force and pith to aduaunce his supper aboue those other because his â—upper he termeth a solemne holy institution whereby we are put in possession of Christ or els in Caluins obiection taken from the Apostle let the reader be warned that this of Beza is nothing els but a solemne kind oâ— lying hipocritical feyning vsual to him the rest of his bretherne as before bath bene sayd For he meaneth nothing more but that by their holy and solemne bread our faith is stirred vp to beleeue Christ by which faith we feed on Christ and so apprehend and possesse him euen as did the Iewes in their communion And the very self same holy and solemne apprehension and possession Beza in like maner attributeth to the Iewish ceremonies thereby discovereth his couÌ„terfeit solemne hipocrisie vsed here For expounding that word of S. Paule where he calleth circumcision signaculum iustitiae Beza falleth out in to a wondering exclamatioÌ„ Quid magnificentius de vllo sacramento dici possit VVhat can be spoken more highly or amply of any sacrament what so euer ether old or new Before the Apostle called it a signe which is the common nature of al sacraments for that they are external signes and ceremonies Nâ—â— he expresseth the substance and effect thereof that it is ordeyned not only to signifie but also to sâ—ale the iustice of faith by which we are put in possession of Christ him selfe quatenus sâ—ilicet spiritus sanctuâ— reipsa id intuâ—â—raeâ—â—aâ— quod externa câ—remonia praelicationi verbi coniuncta oculis repraesentat I meane so far forth as the holy ghost â—â—th performe that within which the external ceremonie ioyned to the preaching outwardly representeth to the eyes This is the precise and true forme by which he meaneth that we are put in possession of Christ by his holy and solemne supper for that by the breaking of bread and preaching of the minister our external senses if we wel atteÌ„d the breaking and preaching are moued and consequently by meanes thereof our faith and mynd erected to beleeue so the holy ghost working in our harts we possesse Christ which possession as he graunteth was in like sort and as largely geuen in the Iewish sacraments as in the Christian As for the obiection taken from the Apostle
vsed by Caluin Beza Martyr Musculus and lightly euerie other sacramentarie that the Iewish Manna vvater out of the rocke their passing ouer the sea and baptisme in the cloud vvas as good and effectual as our sacraments of baptisme the Eucharist and that the Ievves in those figures receiued the self same foode in the one spiritual benefite in the other as vve do in these sacrameÌ„ts of ours the ansvvere is that they al sovvly corrupt and peruert the Apostles vvords and sense The Apostle saith not that the Ievves had the self same spiritual foode which Christians baâ—â— as though he compared Ievves and Christians together but that the Ievves amonge them selues good bad iust and vniust receiued those benefites there mentioned For the Ievves al alike passed the redde seaâ— they vvere al directed alike by the cloud they al alike did eate of Manna vvherein the evil men had as great preeminence as the good they did al alike so did their beasts drinkâ— of the water which issued out of the rocke albeit most of them were wicked men in whom god was not pleased This is al that the Apostle saith These vvere temporal benefites bestowed vpon the Iewes which in no place of the Scripture haue annexed vnto them spiritual grace or remission of sinnes as haue the Christian sacraments wherevnto they are impiously opposed And therefore S. Basil with great zeale mueâ—gheth against them which make such odious comparison as men who vtterly disgrace and extenuate the maiestie of the nevv testament For saith he what remission of sinnes what regeneration or renouation of life was geuen by the sea what spiritual gift was geueÌ„ by Moyses what mortificatioÌ„ of sinne was wrought by his ceremonies or sacraments As for the vvord spiritual applied by S. Paule to Manna the vvater he calleth it spiritual partly because it proceeded from a spiritual diuine miraculous cause as in the storie is noted partly because it signified as did almost al things in the old lavv euen the very stones and timber of Salomons temple spiritual things which vvere to be exhibited in the nevv testament in Christ and his church For that of it self it vvas not ordeyned for a spiritual foode but for a corporal the very text proueth which assigneth the vse of it to al indifferently no lesse to euil men then to good yea no lesse to beasts then to men and our Sauiour him self vvho plainlie separateth it from the diuine Manna of the nevv testameÌ„t directly affirmeth it to haue bene geuen for a corporal foode to differ as much from his diuine body geuen in the sacrament of the nevv testament as doth any vulgar bread or flesh And thus do the auncient fathers agreably to Christs words expound it acknovvleging it for his proper and peculiar vse to haue bene an earthly foode though besides it vvere a signe a figure an image a shadovv and signification of Christ the spiritual Manna and heauenly bread vvhich in deed came from heauen in vvhich first vvord of the definition of our sacraments for every sacrament is a signe that Manna and water of the rocke agree with our sacraments and therefore some times so far forth they are by S. Austin compared together but touching the effect of grace never made equal And now if it shal please the reader to conferre these last 6. rules or obseruatons gathered out of the doctrine of Caluin and the Caluinists with that his first magnifiing of Christs real presence in the Sacrament of the Supper he shal very easely discouer him to be a vvicked hipocrite and also find everie parcel point of that whole paragraph gainsayd and refuted by ech one of these 6. obseruations ensuing vvhich if a man vvould gather in to a table after the example before shevved he should fil a great deale of paper and find at the lest so many contradictions in these later against that first as be sentences perhaps lines in that first He shal vvithal be able to frame to him selfe some certaine and sure knovvledge to sure at lâ—st as may be gathered out of the vvritings of such vvethercockes vvho according to the Apostles vvords are tossed vp and dovvne vvith everie nevv conceite as a light clovvde is caried here there vvith every puffe of vvind vvhat the Caluinian supper is to vvit after his ovvne description bread and vvine or some like nutriment voyd of Christs body and blud or any vertue thereof or any other grace instituted for this only purpose to put vs in remembrance of Christ in no respect or comparison better then the significatiue bread or sheeps flesh vsed by the Iewes in their Paschal suppers ¶ And thus much touching the equalitie of their sacrament with the Ievves as they graunt vve accept so herevpon a litle farther we proue vvhich perhaps they vvil deny that the Ievvish sacraments vvere better then thens not only for that the Ievvish had their Institution from god and his holy prophets vvhereas this supper proceedeth directly from the deuil his Ministers but also for that comparing the sacraments thus by them described in them selues the Ievvish much excelled VVhereof this only reason in their diuinitie is a most sure demonstration The preper vse institution and end of the sacrament is this and in this confuteth the benefite thereof that it stiriâ—th vp our â—aith moveth ouâ— external and internal 〈…〉 to consideration of the thing signified that is Christ his death VVhereof â—â—â—â—lâ—vvâ—th that where this 〈…〉 is most â—ound where a signe is most lâ—â—â—â—y 〈…〉 and 〈◊〉 to moue ouâ— senses 〈…〉 iy to quicken ouâ—â—aith and excite our mynds to the consideration of Christ his death that â—gâ—e hath in it so much the more singularly and in a more high and excellent degree the nature of a sacrament But this was saâ— better and more effâ—â—â—â—ally wrought by 〈…〉 ng a lamb by pâ—wâ—â—g out the â—lud thereof then by 〈…〉 bread and drinking beare 〈…〉 or wine I or both the lamb is a more noble câ—eatuâ—e then is bread therefore more apt to â—gâ—â—â—â—c Christs body the noblest creature that euer was the innocency of a lamb to signifie Christs innocencie that lamb killed that flesh that blud was a more lâ—â—â—ly signe or this lamb of god killed for â—s of his body of his blud giuen for â—s then breaking of bread drinking of any wine or beare be it neuer so strong Therefore in that wherein consiâ—â—eâ—â— the proper nature of a sacrament the â—ewâ—â—h excelled ours Againe an other saâ—â—â—mental signification and the same very principal 〈…〉 they in this that as the bread and wine nourisheth our bodies corporally so Christ caâ—e by faith nourisheth our sâ—wâ—es spiritually But that Iewish supper hauing in it yong tender nourishing flesh of a lamb together with bread and vvine nourished corporally and so signified Christ body nourishing
three or fovver bretherne eating and drinking their symbolical bread and vvine hovv can ether that confirme to vs the child to be saved or this that such eaters and drinkers eate spiritually Christs flesh and thereby shal haue eternal life Certainly if the minister out of the vvord did not tel them so much before the bread and vvine vvould neuer confirme nor scarce signifie such spiritual eating much lesse eternal life ensuyng thereof So that vvhereas ordinarily in common practise vvhence these men take their Theologie in this point seales confirme words and vvritings among men and vvithout a scale the vvord and vvriting is of no great force or value in lavv to make a bond and obligation the seale geuing al strength force thereto here it is cleane contrarie For al dependeth of the vvord and the vvord geueth strength vertue and force to the seale not the seale to the vvord and the vvord vvithout the seale is altogether sufficient carieth vvith it ful entier and perfit authoritie vvhereas the seale vvithout the vvord is nothing at al but as M. B. truly saith a common peece of bread so that truly to speake the vvord is rather to be accompted a seale to the bread then the bread a seale to the vvord Again these men in making such comparison vvaigh not the true nature and difference of vvords and seales as they are vsed in things diuine humane In humane because men are mortal and mutable and false so that vve can not take hold of their vvord vve are enforced to vse other meanes for our assurance and certification as first to put their vvords in vvriting and then to ratifie both vvord and vvriting by sealing But in God and things diuine it is not so But for so much as God is immortal immutable and constant vvhose vvord is vvorking and vvhose vvord once vttered is as sure certaine infallible and irreuocable as if it vvere vvritten in faire velem in a thousand exemplars confirmed by as many seales here can be no vse of any such seales as is amoÌ„g men because no such seale can add any more authoritie or certaintie to his vvord as it doth to ours How beit it pleaseth him some times to vse some kynd of confirmation vvhich may not vnfitly be compared to a kind of sealing as vvhere the Euangelist saith that vvhen Christ was ascended his Apostles preached euery vvhere our lord working with them and confirming their dostrine and preaching with signes and miracles of vvhich kynd of confirmation the storie of the Acts of the Apostles is ful But these were miraculous noâ— sacrameÌ„tal seales applied truly properly to speake not to coÌ„firme gods vvord or promises but to confirme vnto the heaâ—ers the authoritie and credit of the preachers the prophets Apostles and disciples of Christ as euery vvhere appeareth both in the old testament nevv And therefore as S. Paul teacheth such miraculous signes and seales properly are not for faithful men Christians but for faithles and infidels to dravv them to faith and Christianitie And this is a far different kind of seales from the sacraments vvhereof vve here entreat vvhich neuer any learned father or vvriter called seale in the Protestant sense For albeit sometime S. Augustin vseth the vvorde and applieth it to the sacraments as also do some other Doctors yet they neuer meane nor applye them as do the Protestants but cal them seales ether because they signe the faithful vvith such a marke vvhereby they are distinguished from the vnfaithful or because they conteyne in them a secret holy thing that is inuisible grace in vvhich sense the booke of the Apocalyps is said to be signed vvith 7. seales in both vvhich senses S. Austin S. Gregorie Nazianzene calle them seales or because they geue perfit and absolute grace vvhereby a Christian being vvashed from his sinnes and made the child of god in baptisme receiueth farther strength to persist and stand fast in his Christian prosession and fight constantly against the enemies of Christ and his church the deuil and his ministers is confirmed in hope and hath as it vvere a pledge of eternal life in vvhich sense S. Cornelius an auncient Pope and martyr and after him S. Leo the Great calle the sacrament of confirmation a seale The vvords of the first are VVhereas Nouatus the heretike was only baptised but afterward tooke not such other things as by order of the church he ought neque Domini sigillo ab Episcopo obsignatus suit nether was signed with the seale of our lord by the bisshop in the sacrament of confirmation how I pray â—ow receiued he the holy ghost to strengthen him in his Christian saith S. Leo in his 4. Sermon de natiuitate Domini Stand fast in that faith in which after yow were baptised by water the holy ghost yow receiued the Chrisme of saluation the seale or pledge of eternal life In these senses and perhaps some other tending to like effect the auncient godly fathers calle the sacraments seales as questionles euery sacrameÌ„t and especially that of the most blessed Eucharist is a most admirable signe and seale and confirmation and demonstration of gods infinite mercy and Christs infinite loue towards mankynd But the sense of the Protestants as it is foolish fond nevv vvithout al vvit and reason and not only so but also wicked impious heretical Anabaptistical as hath bene shevved neuer taught by the holy scriptures of god by any Apostle Evangelist auncient father or Councel so I can not greatly enuy at Bezaes glorious triumph vvhich he maketh to him self and his maisters for the first invention thereof wherein he so flattereth and pleaseth him self that hauing expressed the same in such sort as here M. B. doth and I before out of Beza haue alleaged he suddenly from explication of the scripture breaketh out in to admiration of him self and his companions in these vvords This my exposition coÌ„cerning circumcision a seale of iustice al other sacraments seales in like maner if a man compare with such things as not only Origenes but also sundry other of the auncient fathers albeit for godlines and learning most famous haue written vpon this place he shal doubtles find what greâ—â— abundant light of truth the lorde in this time hath powred out vpon vs of al other men most vnworthy thereof No doubt a vvorthy doctrine for such Doctors and in deed to be vvondered at vvhich being so necessarie for the church as these men make it for it conteyneth the true faith of the sacraments vvhereas Origen S. CypriaÌ„ S. Austin S. Ambrose S. Leo. S. Basil S Gregorie Nazianzene and sundry other for holines and learning most famous as he confesseth could neuer find it out and yet these men Caluin Beza and Iohn Cnox for learning not very famous and for horrible filthines and abomination of life not to be named and not heard
I vvil take as sure certainâ— vz. that Christ not only gaue thankes to his father but also blessed sanctified and consecrated the bread because vve are taught so to beleeue both by the plain vvords of the Evangelists by S. Paule by consent of al fathers oâ— al auncient I â—â—uâ—gies or soâ—mes of Masse in al churches of Christendome vvhereof some example shal be geuen hereafter also by vâ—â—â—â—t of M. Ievvel Caluin Eâ—â— a vvho so effectually by innumerable places of cripture pâ—oue it and refel Musculus and consequently M. B. in thâ—â— point vvâ—o against al scripture wil haue blessing of these elements to be al one vvith geuing thanks to God VVherefore according to this most sufficient authoritie as Musculus truly telleth vs that Christ at tvvo seueral times first ouer the bread next ouer the cup gaue thanks to God so must vve also assure our selues the scripture these Protestans leading vs therevnto that Christ at tvvo seueral times blessed sanctified and consecrated those 2. seueral elements of bread and vvine vvhich he tooke in his hands Concerning the breaking and deliverie of the bread Musculus vvords are Christ brake it with his owne hands gaue it to his disciples He gaue not the bread whole to them which they afterwards should breake but him self brake it He gaue it not them to distribute but him self did distribute it willed them to take and eate it He deliuered with his owne hands this sacrament of grace signifying withal that it was not possible for any man to haue participation of his grace except himself gaue it by the vertue of his spirite Of which point I warne the reader not without cause Thus much saith Musculus concerning the external fact doing of Chrisi so far furth as agreeth to the institutioÌ„ of the mystical Supper After al vvhich finally for declaration that they might vnderstand vvhat he meant by the premisses he addeth This is my body which is geuen and broken for yow Do this in commemoration of me Again This cup is the new Testament in my blud which is shed for yow and for many to remission of sinnes Do this so oft as ye shal drinke it in commemoration of me This is the summe of that which Christ did vvhich he spake about the sacrament vvhich as the same author vvitnesseth Christ first of al did in the eyes of his disciples both that they afterwards should do the same them selues and also deliuer the same order to his church ¶ And this being agreed vpon according to the manifest storie of the Gospel exposition of the purest Protestants that Christ thus did as hath bene novv in particular described and thus spake item that thus he did spake as things apperteyning to the Sacrament and which he would not haue omitted by his Apostles disciples and aftercomeâ—â— to returne to M. B vvho affirmeth al the actionâ— and speeches which Christ did and vttered to be so essential to the Supper that if any one yea any iote be omitted the whole Supper is marred and peruerted let vs conserre these doings of Christ vvith the Scottish Supper ministred after their order vvhich is this Commonly once in a moneth the minister vvhen the supper is to be ministred first of al out of the pulpit reherseth briefly to the people a peece of the 11. chapiter of S. Paule touching the Institution of this sacrament Afterwards he maketh some Sermon against ether the Pope and Catholike religion vvhich is their common argument or in praise of their owne which is more seldom or as seemeth good to the minister The Sermon or exhortation ended the minister cometh downe from the pulpit and sitteth at the table now beginneth the communion euery man and woman likewise taking their place as occasion best serueth Then he taketh bread and geueth thanks ether in these words folowing or like in effect The thankes-geuing set downe for a paterne for al ministers to folow as in sevv vvords it rendereth thanks to God for his benefites of creation sanctification and redemptioÌ„ by Christ as is ordinarie in many good prayers so it maketh no mention of the Supper or any thing vvhich Christ spake or did therein saue that in one place they mention a table and remembrance of Christs death in these vvords Although we be sinners neuertheles at the commaundemeÌ„t of Iesus Christ our lord we present our selues to this his table which he hath left to be vsed in remembrance of his death vntil his coming again to declare and witnesse before the world that by him alone we haue receiued libertie and life c. and that by him alone we are possessed in our spiritual kingdom to eate and drinke at his table with whom we haue our conuersation presently in heauen This is al that approcheth any thing nigh to the vvords and Institution of Christ Immediatly after this thankes-geuing the ministâ—r breaketh the bread and deliuereth iâ— to the poeple who distribute and diuide the same amonge them selues according to our Sauiour Christ commaundement Likewise he geueth the â—â—p Here is the entier forme and essence of the Scottish communion For that during the time of eating and drinking some place of the scripture concerning Christs death is read this is a sequele and fashion folowing after and not included in the nature substance of the communion vvhich al goeth before Let vs novv seuerally confer Christs supper vvith this communion and consider how many the same most substantial and essential points after their ovvne graunt vsed there are wanting here Christ first of al tooke bread in to his hands and afterwards gaue thanks and blessed vvhich albeit it may seeme vsual and ordinarie yet saith Musculus it is not so and the very vvords of scripture shevve that it apperteyned to the order and institution of a sacrament Here the minister cleane contrariwise inuerting the order of Christ first geueth at large a thanks after taketh the bread the vvhich vvithout any thanks or any vvord at al he deliuereth to the people Secondarily Christ made a special and seueral thankes-giuing blessing and sanctification or consecration first of the bread and next of the cup and this also he did as a thing perteyning to the verie order and institution of his sacrament Here is no such matter but a confuse thankes-geuing vvithout relation to ether and vvhich conteyneth a blessing sanctification or consecration of nether Christ did not only breake the bread once and afterwards bid them breake and distribute it amonge them selues but him selfe brake and distributed and deliuered it to them ech one with his owne hand signifying thereby that it was not possible for them to haue any participation of grace except he gaue it them by the vertue of his spirite Of vvhich point Musculus geueth the reader a special warning and prouiso Here the minister loth belike to take so much paynes
no other truth then is coÌ„teined in the word Yet because it is a seale annexed to the word it perswades me better of the same VVhereof having said before sufficieÌ„tly I vvil not stand to repeate or make any nevv discourse here Only thus much wil I vvarne the reader that this nevv found doctrine of seales to confirme gods vvord and promises vvhich these extraordinarie ministers so much inculcate never before heard of in the vvord of god of the old testament or nevv never in the Gospels or Epistles Canonical noâ— yet in general Councels or auncient fathers or practise of Christs Catholike church seemeth to haue had his first original roote from the corrupt maners of these ministers and their scholers VVho continually boasting of their only faith without vvorks and hauing as false a faith as euer had any Carthaginian or Greeke because they coÌ„monly lye dissemble and circumuent and vvhen they looke most simply meane most traiteiously vvhen they counterfeite much grauitie â—obrietie and religion then are ful of craft guilefulnes falsitie as also Caluin truly vvitnesseth of them they finding this in them selues and that they can not trust one an other vpon vvords and promises but must haue seales and obligations besides from their ovvne corrupt behaviour dravv this to the church of Christ and make like reckening of Gods vvord and sacraments as they do of their ovvne vvords vvritings and obligations and as they applie seales and bonds to coÌ„firme their ovvne graunts promises because othervvise no man vvil trust them they induce like opinion vpon God his vvord as though the credit thereof depended in like maner vpon seales and obligations But as at this present there is many a simple people in the vvorld that hath not the vse of seales but trust one an other as vvel vpon their â—â—â—e word or vvriting without farther assurance and many a good plaine and honest man I knovv vpon vvhose vvord a man might veÌ„ture as much as vpon his seale and as truly infallibly vvould he performe it so much more do al true Christians make like accompt of gods word vvhich as it infinitely overpeiseth the vvord of the best man so infinitely is it lesse holpen by these fantastical seales of bread vvine VVhich vvord of God albeit M. B. tel vs that his bretherne beleeue the better by the seales of bread drinke yet shal he be hardly able to persvvade that to any vvise man For first it is a very bad and miserable faith to say no more that fully perfitly absolutely beleeueth not God vpon his only vvord that vvord vvhich he knoweth questionles to be gods and to proceed from him Again it is as vveake miserable a faith to speake plainly litle differing from vvitles foly and infidelitie vvhich casting any doubt of the vvord vvhich he acknovvlegeth to be gods is any vvhit any iote confirmed therein or mooued to beleeue it the more for these sophistical signes and seales as sure certain as vvethercocks for that as they turne here and there north south east and vvest in to euery quarter and corner of the world vvith the turning of euery vvind euen so these seales hauing al their strength grace authoritie from the ministers sermon vvhich geueth life sowle to them may be applied by the minister to signifie that is to seale things as contrary as the east is to the vvest or north to the south as hath bene in part touched before and here cometh somvvhat more to be spoken of in this place Of the VVORD necessarily required to make a sacrament The Argument Of the word which M. B. and the Calvinists require to be ioyned to their bread wine water to make them sacraments By the word they meane a Sermon VVhich opinion is refelled as wicked and vtterly false The nature of this word is farther examined and refelled by the example of Christ and manifest reason drawen thence ioyned with the authoritie of the English congregation which in this part of faith reproveth the Scottish ministerie as plainly Anabaptistical This opinion concludeth most of the communions and baptismes vsed thorough out England and Scotland to be no sacraments as is declared by 4. sensible demonstrations 5 It is the high way to abolish al vse both of Sermons and also of Sacraments CHAP. 10. HAving hetherto spoken of the general consideration of the elements saith M. B. it restes that we say somwhat concerning the word which I cal the other part of the sacrament I vnderstand and take the word for that thing which quickens this whole action which serves as it were a sowle and geveâ— life to the whole action For by the word and the appointement of Christ in the word the minister knowes what is his part the hearer what is his part and every one is prepared the minister how to deliver and the hearer how to receiue Of this vvord vvhich is principally to be attended in the sacrament and vvhich as M. B. truly speaketh if he rightly vnderstood his ovvne vvords applied them as he ought is the life of the sacrament and geveth al force and grace vnto it he afterwards somwhat more at large discouâ—seth â—hus As the Papists we agree that the word man concurre to the nature and constitution of a sacrament so when we come to know what is meant by the word we differ much Let the Papists opinion vvhereof yovv sceme to haue litle skil-as shal appeare hereafter in place conuenient â—est for this present and helpe vs to vnderstand your ovvne opinion concerning this word vvith vvhich yovv are better acquainted By the VVord necessarily required to make this sacrament we meane saith M. B. the whole institution of Christ Iesus what so euer he said what so euer he did or commaunded to be done And this whole institution ought to be intreated after this maner First there ought a lawful pastor who hath his calling from god to intreat it And this lawful pastor ought to intreat it lawfully VVhat is that He ought to preach it to proclame it and publikely with a cleare voyce to denounce it He ought to open vp and declare the â—ail parts of it what is the peoples part and what is his owne part â—ow â—e ought to deliuer and distribute that bread and wine and how the people ought to receiue it and how they ought to receiue the body blud of Christ signified by it This â—e ought to do in a familiar and homely language that the people may vnderstaÌ„d him For except ye heare Christ in such a language ye can â—â—â— vnderstand Except ye vnderstand it is not possible for â—oâ— iâ— beleeue and without beleef there is no application of Christ This is the sâ—mme of M. B. preaching touching this point the effect of al cometh to this that the Sermon of the minister to whom yet he prescribeth somvvhat like a Superintendent
of what matter and in vvhat sort he must preach is that word vvhich is so necessarie and vvhich maketh the sacrament In vvhich discourse first of al the Christian reader may note the good opinion that these Ministers haue of them selues and their owne vvords These signes seales albeit they be ordeyned by Christ to signifie and seale as hath bene often tymes said yet are they dead the bread is commoÌ„ bread the vvine is common vvine notvvithstanding Christs ordinance institutioÌ„ Many times the Protestant vvriters vvil beare vs in hand that the auncient fathers vvheÌ„ they speake of Consecâ—ation meane thereby nothing els but the application of the bread vvine from prophane vse to holy from serving coÌ„mon tables to â—â—â—â— the table of the Lord. The bread water and wine when in baptisme the supper they are applied to holy vses then are they consecrated saith M. Ievvel Bullinger This is their Consecration saith Caluin when they are applied to spiritual vses And so commonly vvrite Peter Martyr Zuinglius â—â—â—a and the rest But novv albeit the bread and vvine be brought from the tauerne to the church and there remaine vpon the table al the bretherne and sisters attend ready to receiue it in memorie of the Lords death vvhich is from prophane vse to apply it to maruelous holy yet notvvithstanding stil it remaineth coÌ„mon bread coÌ„mon wine a dead elemeÌ„t vvithout life sowle like a dead carcas If a Catholike priest take such bread and vvine and hauing vvith him a sufficient company to make a communion after their praiers ether priuate or publike purpose farther to consecrate this common bread by rehearsing al the words of Christ ether after S. Maâ—thevv S. Marke S. Luke or S. Paule al this vvorketh nothing thus to recite Christs vvords is magical inchauntment and it is grosse beastlines doltishnes to suppose that they are of any effect to vvorke any thing say Caluin and Zuingliê° The Papists do perversly superstitiously ascribe force of sanctification to recital of such vvords Nulla est vis in recitatione verberum Domini there is no vertue at al in reciting the words of the Lord ether in baptisme or in the supper saith Bullinger But yet after al this if a minister of Calvins creation vvho hath as much authoritie to make this sacrament as hath his vvise and nether of them more then they haue to create a nevv Sunne or Moone if such a minister come tel a tale of his owne spend perhaps an houâ—e oâ— more in railing at the church discipline at the Pope at Papists or in some such other argument vvhich is the coÌ„mon subiect of their sermoÌ„s for fevv ministers folovv M. B. order of preaching prescribed here then forsooth the whole action is quickened then the bread and vvine receiue life and sowle and from common bread become sacramental bread significatiue bread sealing bread vvhereby it is sealed and confirmed to al the bretherne and sisterne that they haue spiritually eaten the flesh of Christ by faith Is not the blindnes of these men vvonderful that can thus iustle our Christ to thrust in them selues can reiect his vvords and so magnifie their ovvne And where find they in any part of the scripture old or nevv that a Sermon is required as a necessarie part of the sacrament VVhat Apostle or Euangelist vvriteth so vvhat Doctor or Councel euer so expounded the scripture or gathered any such rule or conclusion thence VVe find in the Evangelists the vvhole entier forme vsed by Christ when first of al he instituted this sacrament which before we haue in particular declared and that according to the iudgement of a learned and siue Caluinist Nether in the text of the Evangel noâ— yet in the exposition of this Euangelist is any such preaching mentioned much lesse is it made a necessarie part of the sacrament vvhereon the life of it dependeth Our sauiour after the deliuerie of it in S. Iohn maketh a long sermon I graunt but nether is that adioyned as a part of the Supper nether toucheth it the sacrameÌ„t the institution oâ— administration or explication or declaration there of to the people which only declaration of the mysterie to the people saith Caluin maketh the dead elemeÌ„t to become a sacrament In the other sacrament of baptisme this â—â—oward perversitie sheweth it self much more For to vvhom wil they preach there To vvhose vse frame they their sermon To the infants or to the people present if any be If to the infant this in deed were very magical not preaching but inchauntement to preach to the infant who vnderstandeth never a vvord To the people Hovv so vvhereas the sacrament is not for them the baptisme is not to be applied to them the signe or element must be ioyned to make a sacrament not for the standers by but for the receiuers ¶ Because this vvhereof vve now intreate is the most necessarie and substantial part of the sacrament and also of these sermons we must somvvhat more exactly sift and search the true meaning of this word preached which is of so great authoritie and operation in geving life and spirite to the Scottish and Geneua sacraments otherwise very dead and deadly VVherefore I desire a litle more particularly to be resolued and ansvvered vvhat word preached this is whereof dependeth the life and sovvle of their sacrament Hath euery sermon this grace Doth every idle preaching of a minister geue life and sowle to the sacrament and with common bread make such a wonderful coniunction of Christs body as M. B. telleth vs VVhat if out of the pulpit he tel a tale of Robin hood and litle Ihon VVhat if he do nought els but inveigh against the Pope the Cardinals Purgatorie praying to Saints so forth VVhat if he fal in commendation a common argument among the ministers of love matters and chamber-worke as VVigandus an Archprotestant one of the framers of the Magdeburge Centuries writeth that once him selfe was present vvhen a gospelling minister in his sermoÌ„ to that effect cited aboue 20. verses out of Ovid dâ— arte amandi which also to be a common veine of preaching in Scotland it is wel knovven testified Doth every such pulpit talke geue sowle to your sacrament Yovv wil say no. For albeit both in ScotlaÌ„d EnglaÌ„d a number of CoÌ„munions are currant passe wel with such Sermons both the CoÌ„munions Sermons are compted perfite enough the multitude both of ministers and Protestants like this kind of preaching best yet vvhen they come to M. B. scanning he as vve may here perceiue vvil dislike them find theÌ„ deficient VVherefore let vs put the case somwhat more indifferent VVhat if the Minister make his sermon of the creation of the vvorld of the fal of Adam of the patriarchs mariages of the deluge of the childreÌ„ of Israels captivitie of the old law VVhat if he talke of
the nevv testament of persecutions of S. Paules vocation his coming to Rome his trauailes there to plant the gospel VVhat if he exhort the people vvhich yet I suppose is a rare argument in the ministerie to chastitie to almes to fasting to praier and such other good vertues vvithout any relation oâ— explication of the Supper of Christ Nether is this the vvord vvhich geueth life to the sacraments For so yovv decide the matter both here and in the beginning that the vvord vvhich yovv meane and is so necessarie is the word preached distinctly and opening al the parts of the element There must be preached and proclaymed and publikely denounced with a cleare voyce what is the ministers part what is the peoples part how he ought to deliuer distribute that bread that wine how they ought to receiue it what is signified by it a number of such matters and al this must be done in a familiar and homely language This vvord must go before the sacrament as a seale folow and be appended thereafter And according to Caluin when we heare meÌ„tion made of the sacrameÌ„tal word which ioyned to the signe maketh it a sacrameÌ„t we must thereby vnderstand the promise which being preached by the minister with a cleare voyce may guide and leade the people thether where the signe tendeth and directeth vs that is as before M. B. hath declared it how able the bread is to nurish the body to life earthly and temporal so able is the flesh of Christ signified by the bread to nurish both body and sowle to life everlasting VVel noâ— vve knovv vvhat kind of vvord it is vvhich thus geueth life and sovvle to their sacrament vve shal be better able to iudge vvhat maner of thing the Scottish Geneva sacrameÌ„t is And first of al it must needs be cleane separateâ— from the sacrament of Christs last supper For it is manâ—est by the gospel that the sacrament of Christ had â—â— such life and sowle For 1. nether did Christ make a Sermâ— 2. nether did he vvith a cleare voyce proclame and denounce vvherevnto the signe did leade direct theâ—â— 3. nether taught he his disciples that as the bread vvâ—â—â— nourished their bodies to life temporal so his flesh 〈◊〉 able to nourish both body and sovvle to life euerlastinâ— 4. nether declared he vvhat vvas the Ministers paâ—◠〈◊〉 dutye 5. nor yet vvhat vvas the peoples 6. he made 〈◊〉 mention hovv the one should deliuer the bread and vvine 7. nor hovv reuerently the other should receiue it and so furth in al the rest we find no peece or parcel of such a word that is of such a life and sovvle in any Euangelist of whom yet doubtles vve learne vvhat Christ did very sufficiently so far as is necessarie to the making of the sacrament VVherefore by these so many essential parts required to their Scottish or Geneua signe and not vsed or practised by Christ in his sacrament vve may assuredly conclude that Christs sacrament and their signe are of cleane different natures Besides al vvhich M. B. him self teacheth vs that in their Scottish Supper there are tâ—a propiners or geuers vvhich deale their sacrament vvhereas in Christs supper there was but one In the Scottish supper the minister exhibiteth only the signe of the bread he deliuereth only an earthly creature not worth a straa vvhereas in Christs supper it vvar far othervvise as M. B. be he never so prophane vvil I suppose graunt But to omit this and returne to the word and stay thereon Although this be most euident and most sufficient especially that of the vvord not preached by Christ and yet required of necessitie by them to make an essential separation betvvene Christs sacrament their signe or sealing bread yet for the better iustification of that vvhich I haue said I vvil produce for me against M. B. the Scottish ministrie the authoritie of my lord Archbisshop of Canterbury and our English Congregations vvho condeÌ„ne this opinion of mere Anabaptisme and that by scripture authoritie of their chief Apostle of our age Hâ—lderike Zuinglius For saith my L. of Canterbury against the Puritanes It is manifest Matth. 3. v. 13. 14. 15. that Iohn did baptize without preaching Nether reade we that Christ preached immediatly before the distribution of the sacrament of his body to his disciples Yet hâ—d it bene so necessarie a matter as yow make it and of the substance of the sacraments the Euangelists would haue expressed it by one meanes or other And vvhereas this notvvithstanding the Puritanes proceed say vvith M. B. that the life of the sacraments depen deth of the preaching of the word this as a fowle error and most vntrue he refuteth somewhat more at large with very good reasons part of which for M. B. better instruction or satisfaction I vvil set downe Thus he disputeth If this doctrine be true then be the sacraments dead sacraments and without effect except the word be preached when they be ministred And so some of your adherents in plain termes affirme saying that they are seales without writing and plain blanks VVhich doctrine savoureth very strongly of Anabaptisme and depriueth those of the effects and fruits of the sacraments which haue bene partakers of them without the word preached when they were ministred so consequently even your self M. B. for it as not very like that there was a sermon at your christening And therefore this doctrine must of necessitie bring in rebaptization condemne the baptisme of infants which is flat Anabaptistical For if that baptisme be without life at which the word of God is not preached then can it not be effectual and regenerate those that were therewith baptized and therefore it must of necessitie be iterated that it may be livelie Here is one reason and the same very strong vvhereby M. B. him self probably is proved no Christian as being not at al baptised â—â—r water without the word is nothing but mere deâ—â— water as likewise the bread is nothing but common bread and such baptisme lacking the life of a sermon is not able to geue life or regeneration to others more then a dead man is able to geue life or generation to any and al baptismes heretofore practised in the catholike church and most Protestant churches are no baptismes and consequently al or most of the Scottish nobilitie people ministerie must be rebaptised if they wil be accounted Christians VVhich is one invincible argument for the Anabaptists concerning al Christians of times past Now let vs heare an other for those that come hereafter If baptisme be dead at which the word is not preached then can it do no good to infants who vnderstand not the word preached For if the preaching of the word be so necessarily adioyned to the administration of the sacraments it is in respect of those that are to receiue the
sacraments And then must it needs folow that the sacraments may be ministred to those only which are able to heare the word whereby infants are secluded from baptismâ— And in deed this is one of the strongest arguments that the Anabaptists haue This for al Christians to come so that hence forward by M. B. Theologie baptisme must no more be ministred to children or infants but we must expect with the Anabaptists vntil they come to yeres of discretion that then they hearing the minister preach may haue the right sacrament endued with life and sowle and perfite essence which now for want of such preaching is to them mere water without the spirite a dead body without life or sowle and as our Puritanes speake iust according to Caluin M. B. nothing but seales without writing and plain blanks After foloweth an authoritie of Zuinglius to prove his purpose which because it is very long would fil vp a leaf at lest I willingly omit The summe of Zuinglius allegation and my L. application is that the word preached is not the life and perfection of the sacrament but that the sacraments are perfite without it and that M. B. and al other in teaching this doctrine plainly ioyne hands with the Anabaptists Thus my Lord of Canterbury Vnto whose reasons one more I wil adde which M. B. his preaching before and the general doctrine of the sacramentaries yeldeth against this toy or rather madnes It is agreed among them very generally that the baptisme of S. Iohn was the self same that Christ his Apostles after deliuered to the church we now enioy VVhich being so then must it needs folovv that it had the same matter forme the same elemeÌ„t word that ours hath This is evident can not be denyed Let vs then proceed because of the matter element which was water in both there is no controversie let vs consider the forme that is the life and sovvle the word preached without vvhich baptisme is nothing but water as their other signe of the supper conteyneth nothing but coÌ„mon bread VVhen S. Iohn ministred baptisme to Christ did he preach the word as here vve haue it defined did he with a cleere voyce denounce and proclame to Christ al the parts of baptisme Did he tel Christ vvhat was his owne part and dutie as likevvise what was Christs part dutie How Christ ought to come receiue the baptisme and so furth as here vve haue the vvord defined and explicated Let M. B. make choise of vvhich part he vvil and answere yea or no I suppose he shal perceiue his ovvne error and foly and that as in ansvvering truly he must deny al his preaching hetherto about this VVord so if he vvil stand to maynteine his vvord and say that S. Iohn vsed in his sacrament such a word such preaching and opening al parts of the sacrament this affirmation in the iudgement of sober men wil conuince him not so much of folie as furie not of heresie as of phrenesie the particular consideration vvhereof I leaue to him selfe ¶ Novv let vs a vvhile sequester al authoritie both of god and man of scripture and father old or nevv saving M. B. him self and examine this matter by it self according to indifferent trial M. B. his ovvne preaching If vve marke vvel vvhat vvord it is that he requireth to geue life to the sacrament vve shal find it to be such a word as proueth the tenth part of English and Scottish baptismes and communions to be no sacraments at al. For first vvhereas in very many churches of England and I thinke the like of Scotland baptismes and communions are ministred vvithout Sermons in many some poore homilie is read in steed of a Sermon in al these churches the sacraments are dead things the communion bread is nought els but common bread the vvater of baptisme is coÌ„mon prophane vvater nether of these any sacrament And that the reader thinke not my asseveratioÌ„ bold or straunge vvhere I say that in England in many churches are so fevv Sermons let him vnderstand that albeit there be in deed order prescribed that in euery parish church there should be 4. sermoÌ„s in the yere euery quarter one vvhereas in the yere there are baptismes and communions perhaps 2. or 3. hundred yet this is soil obserued that notvvithstanding such order takeÌ„ the CaÌ„bridge doctors them selues testifie that they know parishes not far from Cambridge so principal an Vniuersitie for preachers where one of these sermons was not in 4. yeres together which if it be so so nere to Cambridge say they what is to be thought of other places of the realme And els where the same parties affirme that in most churches of England there is none that ether can or wil preach so that this one clause maketh voyde thousands of baptismes and thousands of Communions in England and Scotland For this must be obserued by the vvay that such reading of Homilies in the church is not according to this definition not these mens opinion preaching of the word with a cleere voyce no more say they then a mens pen or hand is his tongue and voyce vvho furthermore vtterly deny such reading to be comprised in the name of preaching despise it altogether and say that it is as il as playing on a stage and worse to Next to omit Homilies come to sermons whereas this vvord is appointed by Caluin to be preached after one certaine forme vz that the minister preach the promise and leade the people thether where the signe directeth how many thousand ministers faile in preaching this promise who doubtles in al the Gospels where after the Protestant-Theologie mention is made of the sacrament can not possibly find any such promise as Caluin surmiseth for that assuredly there is none such For to tel vs that these vvords This is my body is a promise is as blunt ridiculons a toy as if a man would make the articles of our Creed promises as if some vvise minister would tel vs that these verities Christ was borne of the virgin he suffred death vnder Pilate be rose againe and ascended vvere promises which are of like qualitie with that promise of Iohn Caluin And if in Christs words vvhere he instituteth this sacrameÌ„t there be no promise hovv then shal the minister preach with a lowd cleer voyce vpoÌ„ this promise which is not If to helpe forward the matter we shal take M. B. his expositioÌ„ that the minister must tel the people whereto the signe tendeth and directeth them that is looke how able the bread is to nurish them corporally so able is Christ to nurish them spiritually to eternal life which spiritual nurriture is sealed coÌ„firmed in them by these reuerend sealeâ— of bread vvine first this similitude is taken not from the scripture but from the doctors fâ—thers and therefore a
Minister is iniuried and it is against his profession out of the pulpit vvhence the only vvord of the Lord should sound to preach such inventions of men Next vvho can doubt but thus to prescribe one certain rule as necessarily to be obserued is the right vvay quit to disanul as many mo thousandâ— of their baptismes communions For vvho can imagin that the vnruly ministers folovv any one certain rule Or vvho knovveth not that it is in a maner against their professioÌ„ to admit any such vnâ—â—â—iâ—ie And yet this very order intended I suppose by Caluin and exactly and particularly thus defined by M. B. is most essential For seing the bread and vvine are material pâ—â—â—s and by their condition apt to signifie in general a hundred things as hath bene declared whereas the determination and reducing of it from general to special from signifying things prophane to signifie things sacred among a number of things sacred one several singular vz. the eating of Christs flesh by faith dependeth vpon the vvord of the minister thus determining it assuredly this vvord bringing vvith it this determination and so separating and abstracting the bread from al other things is most necessary most essential For as a peece of wax vvhich is to receiue the kings seale or image is indifferent before the staÌ„pe to receiue the image of a serpent of a dog of a tree of any living creature man or beast but after by the staÌ„p is limited to one certain forme and representation even so the bread being the matter and as it vvere the vvax which is to be sealed is of it self indifferent to as many stampes images But vvhen the minister cometh and according to M. B. and Caluins direction telleth them that as the bread feedeth their body to life temporal so the flesh of Christ feedeth both body and sovvleto life eternal c. â—ow this word putteth a certain print a certain image a certain stamp signe on the bread vvhereby it receiveth this one sacramental significatioÌ„ This is it vvhich putteth life in to the dead element and this vvord is the life and sovvle of the communion VVhich being so thereof I conclude plainly directly that thorough out al Scotland and England are very fevv true communions very fevv sacraments of Christs body For if there be a Sermon made not an homilie read yea if the sermon entreate of the sacrament and not of other matters yet if the minister preach not as here M. B. and Calvin appoint ether for frowardnes because he wil not be commaunded or els of very conscience because he is no Calvinist but a mere Zuinglian vvho defineth the sacrameÌ„t to be nothing but a badge a token a memorial and that it hath no such vertue of sealing and confirming vvhich the Zuinglian condemneth as Anabaptistical this sermoÌ„ is not the vvord vvhich geueth life to the sacrament but leaveth it as blockish dul and dead an element as it was before Because although the minister vnto this wax of bread and vvine put a seale a staÌ„p a signification yet he putteth not the right seale the right stamp the right signification although he preach the vvord yet he preacheth not that word vvhich should quicken and geue life to this action he preacheth not that word vnto which this seale is to be appended for confirmation Much more may I conclude that al English ministers if they be not Puritanes but folow their Archbisshop my lord of Canterbury vvho condemneth for Anabaptistical no lesse then Zuinglius though for an other reason this opinioÌ„ of geving life to the sacraments by preaching the vvord â—l they can never possibly haue any right communion any right sacrament they can haue nothing but commoÌ„ bread but a dead element because they admit not but contrariwise o great sacrilege impugne that vvhich is the very sowle and should geue life to the sacramet n I conclude thirdly that if a Scottish perfit Calvinian minister make the sermon except he humble him self to preach not only this former word of the promise inveÌ„ted by Calvin found no vvhere in the Gospels nor only the word of the mystical similitude betvvene the bread and Christs body required by M. B. borowed out of the doctors but also besides with a cleer voyce preach distinctly open al the parts of the sacrameÌ„t which thing here M. B. in general requireth in special reherseth explicareth nether is such a CoÌ„munioÌ„ the right sacrament to the essence coÌ„plement vvhereof it is necessarie not that one or two or a fevv but that al parts of the sacrament and sacrameÌ„tal receiving be opened declared vz. 1. that a lawful minister 2. vvith a cleere voyce 3. in a familiar homely language 4. publikely proclame and denounce 5. the bâ—il parts of the Supper or CoÌ„munioÌ„ 6. what is the peoples part 7. what is his owne part 8. how he ought to deliuer that bread and wine 9. how the people ought to receive it 10. how they ought to receiue the body and blud of Christ signified by it 11. how they should come with great reverence to the table Besides al vvhich he must also speake 12. what soever Christ spake in that whole action of his supper without omitting any one iote Al this is comprised in the name of the VVord al this must be preached by the minister before it can be a sacrameÌ„tal signe or supper and omitting any of these quite marreth and destroyeth the vvhole supper as where many parts are required to the nature and substance or essence of some certain body or creature the missing of any one destroyeth the whole as in man or beast the losse of any one essential part as hart lungs c. bringeth certain death to al. So then if the minister do not in particular prosecute ech one of these parts in his sermon if he folovv not precisely and religiously this M. B. his appointment if he play the Minister and sting out in to other matter against Pope and Catholike church and perhaps inveigh against this formal prescription of M. B. for that the spirite of the Lord in them is not to be bridled by men that they know their dutie herein and how the sacrament is to be ministred as vvel as Iohn Caluin Iohn Knox or M. B. him self that they wil stand in defence of their libertie not become servants of men c. if he thus preach or in any other sort so that he omit any part of that word vvhich is before declared the bread and vvine distributed to the people after that kind of preaching is not a sacrament but stil remayneth common bread not worth a straa for want of the right perfit word And so there was never a communion ministred according to the Scottish communion booke since these ministers got rule in Scotland which had ought
in it besides common bread because to passe ouer the former 11. points prescribed by M. B. of which very probable it is that in most CoÌ„munions many of them were omitted 12. by very order of their communion booke some words which Christ spake in deed were most importaÌ„t concerning the sacrament are purposely least out Fourthly I conclude that in most of the Caluinian Communions the communicants do more commonly according to their ovvne doctrine eate the flesh of their lavvful Superiors to vvhom God hath subiected them then the flesh of Christ and so consequently their table is rather the table of Devils then of god they at that table coÌ„municate ten tymes more vvith the Devil then with God For vvhereas among that rayling generation no one argument is more common then to rayle at the Pastors of Christs Church at the Catholike doctrine vvhereas nothing is more vsual and frequent with them then to slaunder Popes Cardinals Bishops Priests the Catholike church of al ages vnto vvhose obedience Christ hath bound theÌ„ vnder paine of damnation when after such raylings and slaunders they eate their tropical bread and vvine they eate as truly to speake the lest the flesh of Popes bishops Catholike Princes and people as they ever do the flesh of Christ and after such a raylative sermon the breaking of their bread and povvring out of their vvine signifieth as directly and autentically the flesh and blud of the Popes and bishops which they not spiritually but spitefully not by right faith but by grosse and froward infidelitie and detraction teare rent pul in peeces spilâ—as at an other more sober sermon if any such be it signifieth the flesh blud of Christ And the bread and vvine being appended afterward serue as aptly in the one sermon time place to seale and confirme the malicious and slaunderous eating of the flesh of Bishops and Christian people as in the other sermon time and place it serueth to seale and confirme the spiritual eating of Christs flesh and the vvord of the one sermon determineth and limiteth as wel and perfitely the general signification of the bread and vvine to the one sense as the vvord of the other sermon restrayneth it to the other sense Finally I conclude that this doctrine is the high way to remove from the CoÌ„munion al vvord of God one or other ether preached or not preached For let vs suppose vvhich may be very easely that halfe a dosen Euangelical bretherne knovv as vvel as the minister vvhereto the signe of bread and vvine is referred that the one signifieth Christs flesh the other his blud that as by bread they are nourished temporally so by the other they are nourished eternally item that by oft frequenting the communion they know their owne dutie they knovv the ministers dutie and so forth if such bretherne come to supper vvhat need is there of a sermon Nether let M. B. deny my supposition For it is a thing most easie facile and no doubt many there are vvhich by reading his booke and perhaps this or by hearing it so oft told them out of pulpits without any â—ers sermon haue it stil fresh and deepely imprinted in their memorie Here in this case what need a sermon To geue life to the action The life is geuen alredy To quicken it It is quickened alredy To put them in remembrance of their dutie I presuppose they remember it vvel inough To keepe the fashion and custome of the church That is not spoken like a Minister And if I graunt that order is good and so not to be neglected for regard of other ignorant men yet hereof it folovved that the vvord preached after your owne fashion often tymes geveth not life to the action but the action the sacrament is as lively as quicke as ful of sovvle without it as with it And to this coÌ„clusion M. B. him self bringeth the whole effect and drift of the vvord preached and his so diligent explication thereof Al vvhich saith he must be done in a familiar language that the people may vnderstand that vnderstanding they may beleeve that beleeving they may applie Christ to them which is to eate him by faith Then if these communicants of vvhom I speake vvithout such a sermon vnderstand as I presuppose already and beleeue and so applie Christ to them vvhich is to eate him spiritually what necessitie is there of the vvord and preaching at al vvhich serveth only for novices or infidels to make them vnderstand and beleeve in Christ and not for faithful such as vnderstand Christ already So that M. B. word preaching thereof so necessarily required to make their supper or signe presupposeth in deed al the bretherne and sisterne vvhich come to receiue to lacke faith and vnderstanding of Christ to be faithles without beleefe of Christ vntil the minister by the vvord preached engender faith in them VVhich defects being not in these communicants of whom I speake for I hope al Caluinists be not in so short space of a few yeres by the preaching of the word become plain infidels though they may be in a good degree towards it what vse or at lest what necessitie is there of the word to be preached vvhen that effect is present before hand to the vvorking vvhereof the preaching serveth VVhat needeth a candle vvhen the Sunne shineth VVhat foly it is to vvater a vvel grovven tree vvhich hauing deepe roote in the earth is able to nourish it self VVhat nurse vseth to feed the child vvhich is 10. or 12. yeres old and able to feed it self If these fevv brethren being of good memorie and hauing zeale to the vvord remember these points of the vvord vvhich maketh the bread to haue life and become a signe if they vnderstand Christ and believe in him by vertue of old sermons vvhich they haue heard of this matter before vvhat needeth this Battologie this idle repetition of one and the self same thing this casting of vvater in to the sea this bringing of a sevv sticks in to the maine vvood This is the islue of this nevv devised vvord to induce contempt neglect of both vvord sacrameÌ„t to make every prophane eating drinking as good as the SacrameÌ„t VVhich thing as before â— haue shevved by other arguments of theirs so here the very vvord whereof they vaunt most and glorie in ten deth to the same scope induceth the same conclusion For it can not be denied but according to this theologie and explication of the vvord 3. or 4. such brethern as I require vvithout preaching of the vvord at any commoÌ„ table at any common breakfast haue a communion a sacramental signe and seale as good effectual as they should haue and others haue with the minister in the church VVhich being very true that their breakefasts at home be as good and sacramental as their suppers in the church it were wel done
me seemeth if partly to avoid superstitioÌ„ partly to correct their ovvne error principally for truthes sake they vvould from hence forth cal their coÌ„mumons rather breakefasts then Suppers For so should men thinke of them as divinely as they deserve and whereas the Protestants cal it a supper imitating that vvord in the Apostle where certainly he calleth not the sacrament but other feasts by the name of our lords Supper they should amend that oversight and vvithal speake more soundly and according to truth as P. Martyr hath very discreetly noted vvriting vpon that same place of the Apostle For in respect of the time and our emptie stomake it were saith he more reason to cal it a breakfast or dinner then a supper And this is the true right issue of the nevv vvord devised by Iohn Caluin and approved by M. B. of that word which they require to the essence of their sacrament a vvord which maketh al singular their communions and sacraments to be of a cleane different nature from that sacrament vvhich Christ instituted for that their sacrament is framed in an other mould hath though not always an other matter yet ever an other forme which geveth the essence to every thing then that of Christs institution theirs receiving al life sovvle perfection and integritie from the ministers cleere voyce and sermon or the receivers faith whereas Christs sacrament receiued his integritie and perfection other ways not by such meanes Again this word of theirs maketh not only their sacrament no sacrament being compared vvith Christs Institution but maketh it also nothing els but common bread for the most part being examined even by this very word which them selues haue inuented as hath bene now declared and the learned reader shal doubtles find most true if he examine the communions and suppers vsed in England France Geneua Zurick ZuizzerlaÌ„d c. by this vvord here appointed as necessarie to separate their sacramental supper from vulgar prophane And if their supper be no sacrament of Christ according to Christs order nor yet according to their owne rules and Theologie vvhat regard would they haue vs to make of it How shal vve esteeme of it as diuine sacred and celestial vvhen as them selues conclude and proue that it is nothing but a common peece of bread an earthly creature voyd of al grace and spirite a dead element not worth â— straa fitter for Pagans then Christians more meet for dogs then men M. B. contradictions The Scottish Supper is no sacrament of Christ The Argument M. B. very notably contradicteth him self in this first serâ—â—â—â— touching the lords Supper as is shewed by sundry examples As before cap. 10. it is proved that they haue no sacrament for want of the word which is the formal part of the sacrameÌ„t so here by a brief repetition of sundry things wanting in the material part which things M. B. consesseth to be of the substance of the sacrament it is manifestly concluded that their supper is no sacrament of Christs institution in respect of the matter no lesse then of the forme CHP. 11. And thus much concerning the word the formal part of the sacrament by vvhich as the more principal vve see proved that their Scottish Supper is no sacrament of Christ Novv for a conclusion of this first Sermon I vvil gather proue as much by the other part vvhich is the matter of the supper according to M. B. his ovvne division out of both vvhich the Christian reader shal be able to gather a most strong and sure resolution that it possibly can not be any sacrament vvhich saulteth both in the one part and in the other vvhich nether hath right matter nor right forme Only first of al I vvil in fevv vvords put the reader in remembrance of M. B. notorious contradictions vsed in this short sermon vvhich I vvisn the rather to be marked partly for that they shew this man to be a right scholer of Iohn Caluin whom he so narowly folovveth eveÌ„ in this blind kind of vvriting and preaching partly for that the original cause of this such opposite doctrine in them both is one that is to say an ambitious affectation vvith high ample and maiestical vvords to vvin some good opinion to their single bread and drinke among their simple auditors vvhom by such glorious speach as it vvere by a baite and pleasant allurement they vvould gladly dravv to some honest opinion of their late devised fantasie These contradictions albeit they be scattered thorough out this vvhole treatise yet the 7. chapiter and 8. and 9. yelde better store of them as for example The bread not only signifieth the body of Christ but hath it also truly conioyned with it For if it signified only a picture were as good And yet the bread is so far from having this coniunction that it vvanteth the signification of a picture I say it signifieth not so much as doth the picture vvhich repre'enteth Christ vnto our remembrance of it self and by it self and so doth not the bread and vvine vvithout a sermon yea and then also it representeth him very doubtfully Againe the bread and wine truly and really deliver the substance of Christ vnto vs For except first we receiue the substance we can haue no participation of the fruit and merits And therefore the bread wine are a very hand which delivereth vs that substance and with that hand is Christs fiesh verely conioyned as a medicine in the boâ—e of the Apotecaries shop And yet the bread doth no wayes deliver or exhibite the body of Christ but only signifie the same For it is a sacrament and ye must looke for no other coniunction then sacramental that is for no other coniunction then significatiue and figuratiue For that is al that a sacrament valueth with these men Again that which we receiue in the sacrament is signified by the bread and vvine is not the benefites of Christ or vertue which fleweth from him only but the very substance of Christ him self For it is not possible that I be partaker of the iuyce which floweth out of any substance except I first get the substance it self And yet the blud of Christ vvhich vve receiue is not the substance of Christ nor any part of his substance For it is no other thing but the quickening vertue and power that fâ—wes from Christ and the merites of his death And we drinke of that blud when we drinke of the lively power vertue that flowes cut of that blud Again there is a wonderful high and mystical yet very true and real coniunction betvvene the bread Christs body yet for al that the bread is no more coÌ„iovned there vvith then Christ is â—oyned with the devil For there is no other coniunction then is betvvene the vvord spoken and the thing vvhich the vvord signifieth and so vvhen Christ commaunded the devils out of
only such as be of naughtie life but also of evil and heretical faith if they be not plain Apostataes Of the Calvinists special iustifying faith by which last refuge as al Catholikes be excluded from their spiritual communicatioÌ„ of Christ so yet other most detestable heretikes thereby receiue Christ as wel as the Calvinists And their doctrine of special faith the very roote of dissolute life plainely directly concludeth against M. B. that in their supper the worst Calvinists receiue Christ as wel as the best CHAP. 15. THe next matter not handled before is a couple of arguments vvhich M. B. obiecteth as in the behalf of Catholikes for the real presence The first is this The Apostle saith He that eates of this bread vnworthely is guiltie of the body and blud of Christ There iâ— their ground VVhereof they frame this argument No man can be guiltie of that thing which be â—â—â— not received Evil men receiue not the body of Christ Therefore they can not be guiltie of it This is the argument as he maketh it His answere to this as likewise to the next is out of Calvin thus First I say the first proposition is very false For they may be guiltie of that same body and that same blud suppose they never received it But take heed to the text The text saith not that hey eate the body of Christ but that they eate that bread drinke that wine vnworthely And yet because they eate that bread drinke that wine vnworthely they are counted before God guiltie of the body and blud of Christ not because they received him for Christ can not be received of any man bâ—â— worthely but because they refused him For when they did eate that bread and drinke that wine they might if they â—ad had faith eaten and drunken the flesh and blud of Christ Nâ—â— because thow refusest the body of Christ offered vnto thee thâ—â— contemnes it and so art guiltie of it In this answere whereas M. B. wisheth the reader or hearer to take heede to the text so do I to so shal he find M. B. to be as right a minister that is to say as right a falsifyer of the text as are coÌ„monly his felow ministers For where findeth he in the text except it be a false corrupted text that such men eate that bread and drinke that wine vnvvorthely Certainely not in any text of S. Paule For thus stand the words even as I find them translated by Beza and Calvin Therefore who so ever shal eate of this bread and drinke of this cup vnworthely shal be guiltie of the Lords body and blud But let every one proue him selfe and so eate of that bread and drinke of that cup. For who so eateth and drinketh vnworthely eateth drinketh damnation to him self for that he discerneth not the Lords body These are the words of the Apostle and thus are they translated by Calvin Beza And novv take as good heed as yow can to the text VVhere find ye that evil men eate bread drinke wine VVhat godles dealing is this to wil your auditour to take heed to the text then your self to abuse the holy scripture to corrupt the text coosen your auditor or reader most vvhen most yow pretend honestie simplicitie vvil him to take heed to the text And let not the reader suppose that the corruption is smale or of no great moment For it is vile grosse and in this place so heretical that he had bene as good to have made a text of his owne as to have made the Apostle thus to speake For the Apostles vvords are divinely exactly set downe and Apostolically expresse the real presence For in naming this bread in vrging and repeating that bread vvhich in greeke is significantly put and declareth a singular bread he meaneth that bread of God which came from heaven that bread which geueth life that body vvhich in the old testament sometimes and in the Gospels oft times in one chapter of S. Iohn a dosoÌ„ times at lest is called bread vvhich bread our saviour him self assureth vs to be his flesh which was to be geven for the life and salvation of the world In naming the cup or that cup vvhich is Christs owne vvord and vvhich vvord being common to any thing conteyned in the cup be it the blud of the new testament which was shed for vs be it wine be it water be it ale or beer or any maner drinke to al vvhich the vvord cup may vvel agree our saviour restreyneth to the blud of the new testament shed for remission of sinnes and so restreyneth that it can not be referred to wine or any other thing S. Paule most assuredly meaneth the same and so in the one and other truly describeth the Catholike faith of the church Against vvhich M. B. telling vs that the Apostle saith such evil men eate that bread and drinke that wine most vvickedly by thrusting in his wine redueeth the vvord bread to a vulgar base signification because talking of bread and wine no man can conceive othervvise vvhereas the vvord bread being in scripture common to al foode vvhereby man liveth and the vvord cuppe being in his kind as large and general doth not signifie nether that our vulgar kind of bread nor this wine more then it signifieth flesh and ale or fish and vvater and being o 〈…〉 self indifferent other places of the scripture necessarily determine it to one certain more high and divine signification as hath bene declared Now vvhereas M. B. maketh a discourse that a man may be guiltie of a thing vvhich he receiveth not which no vvise man doubteth of and so a man may be guilty of Christs body and blud vvhich yet is not eaten oâ— drunken ether corporally or spiritually vvhich is a plaine case for Pagans and persecutors are guilty of Christian blud vvhich vniustly they shed though yeâ— they drinke it not and Pilate Herode Caiphas and the Ievves vvhich crucified Christ vvere guiltie of his death of â—ath body vvhich they eate nether vvay nether as Catholiks nor as Protestants al this is labour spent in vaine and talke to no purpose VVe argue not vpon vvords of condemnation or guiltines in general but vpon the vvords as they are put in the Apostle and ioyned vvith other vvords of his so they clearly prove a real presence and M. B. his interpretation is maledicta glâ—ssa a cursed glose and exposition because it is cleane not besides but against the text For saith M. B. the fault of these men vvhom S. Paule reproveth is because they eate not that divine bread nor drinke that diuine cup S. Paule saith their fault is because they do eate it and drinke it M. B. putteth the indignitie and vnworthines in refusing not receiving it S. Paule in receiving it not refusing For they do receiue eate it but
est Christianum hominem non esse qui non eadem fidei certitudine credit Dominum Iesum esse filium Dei se per eum esse percepturum vitam aeternam VVe professe â—aith Bucer Brentius Georgius Maior vvith other Lutheran Divines disputers against the Catholikes in that conference that he is not to be taken for a Christian man who beleeveth not with the same certitude or assurance of faith both that Christ our lord is the sonne of God and that him self in particular by Christ shal possesse life eternal This is that vvhich M. B. meaneth vvhen he saith that the applying of Christ eating of Christ by faith is to beleeue that he hath shed his blud for me that he hath purchased remission of sinnes to me VVhich iustification and remission of sinnes being in particular beleeved of the Protestant in such sort as is any article of his â—aith thereby geveth a spiritual manducation to him vvhich the Catholike hath not Thus writeth M. B. afterwardes vvhere he spendeth many pages in magnifying this â—aith This faith â—aith he workes a wonderful assurance and persuasion that God loves me that he wil saue me that meâ—â—â— life saluation at perteynes to me This works the seeling of mercy in our hart a particular application whereby we claime Christ and God as proper to vs as if no man bâ—â— title to him and his promises but we Again This particular application is 〈…〉 difference the chief marke and note whereby our â—â—ith who are iustified in the blud of Christ is discerned 〈…〉 faith of the Papists c. For the Papist 〈…〉 promise of mercy to his ownesowle He countes it preâ—â—â—tion as in truth it is and for presumption counted and coâ—demned by the Apostle Rom. 11. 20. 21. â—â— Corint 9. â—7 Philip. 3. 11. 12. Hebr. 4. 1. 2. c. to say I am an elect I â—â— saueâ— iustified This is the vvonderful faith of the Protestants vvhich to them is al in al. This M. B. calleth their iustifying faith By this thy eate Christ so as no man doth 〈…〉 theâ—â— By this they are sure of heaven in heaueÌ„ to be felowes equal vvith S. Peter S. Paule yea vvith the blessed virgin mother of God For so Luther foundeâ— and first inventor of this faith writeth expressely Quâ—â— hac side renati sumus pares sumus in dignitate honore D. Paulo Petro S. Deiparae virgini ac divis omnibus VVâ—â— now that at last vvâ— know exactly vvhat faith it is vvhich geveth the Protestants so deep holdfast in their spiritual maÌ„â—ucatioÌ„ let vs retouâ—â—â— to our principal purpose And as by this vvhich hath bene said of this special Protestant faith I confesse M. B. hath a sufficient ground to chalenge such kind of eating by this faith I meane to him self and his companions Protestants and to exclude out al Catholikes be they as holy as S. Peâ—er or S. Paule vvho never had such a special faith and therefore could never thus â—aâ—e Christ so yet the blocke lyeth stil in M. B. vvay and the rest of his consâ—aternitie that by this saith evil Protestants receive Christ no lesse then good For among the Protestants the most detestable and most blasphemous heretikes have this assurance of their iustification and remission of sinnes no lesse then M. B. or Iohn Calvin or Luther him self vvho by the helpe of an old man whose name Luther expresseth not saith M. Fox but belike it vvas the same man vvho in an other forme frequeÌ„ted Carolostadâ—ê° instructed him first of al inveÌ„ted this special iustifying faith For as after Luther al Lutherans have it most assuredly and after Zuinglius al Zuinglians and after Calâ—in al Calvinists so the Anabaptists more then any of those former sects and Libertines Familie of love by vvord and deed by life and death most confidently chalenge to them selves this assurance that they in Christ have remission of their sinnes that Christ died for them that he shed his blud for them that they are spiritually vnited to Christ they are inwardly so fed by him and outwardly so clothed vvith him that as it is testified by sundry stories many such Protestants both men vvemen and maydens long sithence in Bohemia and of late in Holland at none dayes in the sight of thousands vvould vvalke naked thorough the streetes preaching the vvord of the Lord and could not be vvithdrawen from that furious vnnatural madnes by the terror of present death continually even to death and in death some crying Praise the Lord others Open your eyes ye blind Papists others Revenge O Lord the blud of thy servants and thus not by vvords as M. B. doth but by deeds and facts by patient suffering of death approved they their confidence and assurance of such special faith as M. B. teacheth and Luther the Calvinists describe If then the Anabaptists to make stay and exeÌ„plifie this matter by them vvhom Calvin condemneth for heretikes and vvhose martyrs though in shew marvelous holy and in number never so many he accounteth and calleth martyres diaboli the devils martyrs by vvhich name likewise the Lutherans cal the martyrs of Calvins sect have this sure faith that Christ dyed for them in special and that Christ shed his blud for them in particular and they in this sort spiritually eate Christ how vvith vvhat prohabilitie can M. B. deny such eating to al Protestants of his owne sect though evil livers vvho much more certainly have this faith and therefore much more spiritually eate Christ If an heretike can have a constant persuasion in the death of Christ and then al goes wel and he therefore truly receives Christ by faith according to M. B. definition how much more may a vvicked Calvinist vvhom M. B. accounteth no heretike reteyne this constant persuasion Hath an Anabaptist a â—â—â—th of the sowle apt for such receiving hath not a Calvinist Is evil life a greater bar to such receiving then naughty faith vvhereas this receiving is vvrought only by faith not by life And vvhat need I to rest exemplifie this by Libertines or Anabaptists vvhereas the best surest ground to refute M. B. in this point is the general doctrine of Calvin and Calvinists and the same preached at large by M. B. him self in these Sermons For as M. B. is sure that he is iustified he is elect he is saved he hath this special faith vvhich applieth Christ to him so properly and peculiarly as though no man had interest in Christ but him self alone so this faith vvhich is the right perfit iustifying faith and proper to the elect being once obteyned is never after lost nor never can possibly depart from them commit thy sinnes never so greavous and horible Thus teacheth Beza in the Confession of his Christian Geneva faith most plainly This Calvin in his Institutions
laboureth to prove very earnestly and diligently This M. B. out of Calvin and Beza preacheth very directly and expressely and by scripture wickedly perverted seeketh to establish It is sure saith he and certain that the faith of Gods children is never wholy extinguisted Though it be never so weake it shal never vtterly decay â— perish out of the hart Howsoever it be weake yet a weake faith is faith and such a faith that the lest parcel or drop of â—ssureth vs that God is fauourable frindly and merciful â—â—â— vt Minima fidei gâ—â—ta facit was certo inâ—uiâ—â— contemplari fâ—ciem Dei pâ—acidam sereâ—em nobisoâ—e prâ—pitiaâ— as writeth Caluin M. B. hauing run a good vvhile in this veyne concludeth For conformation of my argument howsoever 〈…〉 bodies â—e 〈…〉 â—o al dissolution â—et after our effectual calling within our sewles suppâ—â—e the fier be covered with â—shes yet it it â—ier therâ— wil no man say the fier is put out suppose it â—e covered No more is faith put out of the sowle supâ—ose it â—â— so covered that it shâ—w nether how nor light outwardlâ— Finally he repeateth as a most sure principle It is certaine that the faithful have never the spirit of God taâ—e from thâ—â— wholy in their greatest dissolutions though they 〈…〉 〈…〉 thâ—rers adulterers c. VVhereas then every Calvinist vvho once hath tasted of Calvins iustifying faith as hath M. B. can never possibly leese that faith but must of necessâ—â—â—â— reteyne it perpetually though he fal into never so great dissolution and filthines of life become he a murtherer an adulterer a robber of churches a sinke of iniquitie as many such iustified and elect Calvinists are vvhereas I say al that notwithstanding he is not forsaken of the spirit of God nor deprived of this special and singular faith vvhich M. B. so oft hath told vs is the only mouth of the sowle the only meane to eate and fâ—â—d oâ— Christ how can he possibly vvith any face or modestie vvith any learning or reason deny that vvicked men receive Christs body vvhereas he alloweth and that infallibly to the most detestable men the spirit of God and this special faith this month of the sowle by vvhich most truly effectually spiritually the body of Christ is eateÌ„ let him vvith better advise marke this his owne preaching and doctrine of Iohn Calvin and his Geneva church and conferre it diligently vvith his other fansie of evil men not receiving Christs body in their signe he shal find this opinion to be altogether false vnprobable and vnpossible to be conceived or beleeved and â—â—â— against their owne preaching and teaching And doubtles besides this special point of Calvinisme vvhich is so pregnant and direct to prove against M. B the general sway of their doctrine induceth the same which is it provoketh men to licentious and dissolute life in that it preacheth only faith to serve for Christian iustice so the verie issue of that solifidian iustification is this vvhen men in life are become most beastly and vitious then to make them most vaunting and glorious for this â—â—stant persuasion that by only faith in Christ they are saved and iustified for that as Luther taught nothing but only infidelitie could 〈…〉 such faithful Protestants of his sect as Zuinglius wrote al such if they beleeve as he preached they forth with were in as great favour with God â—â— Christ Iesus him self and God would no lesse deliver them from â—el no lesse open heaven to them then to his only begotâ—â— soâ—â—e as our first English Apostles and martyrs taught and â—ealed vvith their blud whâ—â— we labour in good workes to come to heaven we do shame to Christs blud For having that particular persuasion vvhereof is spoken if we beleeve that God hath promised vs everlasting life it is impossible that we should perish VVe can not be damned except Christ be damned nor Christ saved except we be saved VVe have as much right and as great to heaven as Christ vvhat soever our life or vvorks be For al they erre that thinke they shal be saved when they have done many good workes For it is not good life but alonely a stedfast faith and trust in God that may bring vs to heaven be our sinnes never so great and that it seeme vnpossible for vs to be saved c. This is the very pith substance of the Lutheran Zuinglian Calvinian English and Scottish Theologie touching only faith this inferreth cleane contrarie to M. B. that vvicked â—nd instructed in the Protestant schoole may have and by coÌ„mon reason and discourse have as constant persua 〈…〉 to be iustified in Christ as men of more honest life And therefore vvhereas M. B. saith that such bad Protestants lacke a mouth of the sowle that is lacke a constant per 〈…〉 in Christs death vvhereby Christ is eateÌ„ he speaketh l 〈…〉 man that lacketh a face that lacketh a forhead or 〈…〉 that lacketh vvit that lacketh knowledge that hath no skil in his owne Theologie in his owne religioÌ„ which by plaine manifest reason and proofe yea by expectence ocular demonstration assureth vs the contrarie The rest of this Sermon vvhich is principally in coÌ„mending and magnifying the vertue of faith that by faith vve have an interest title and right in Christ by faith we possesse Christ that true faith is a straunge ladder tâ—â—â— wil climb betwixt the heaven the earth aâ—cord that gâ—â—â— betwene heaven and earth that couples Christ and vs together c. al this and much more as it is wel spoken of â—â—â— Christian and Catholike faith so being applied to the Lutheran Calvinian Anabaptistical and Scottish presumption that rash and brainsick imagination 〈…〉 described vvhich the Protestants cal faith never I vvord of it is true By that vve have no right title oâ—â—â—terest in Christ but the devil hath a right title 〈…〉 in vs. By it we possesse not Christ but are possessed of his enemie It is no ladder reaching to heaven no cord that goes thether but it is a steep breakeneck downefal sending to helâ—a rope or cable of pride by vvhich as the first Apostata Angels vvere pulled downe from heaven to hel and there tied vp in eternal darknes so by the same pride arrogancie presumption albeit these men baptise it by the name of faith al prowd schismatiks and heretikes Apostataes from Christs Catholike church despisers of that their mother and therefore true children of that first Apostata Lucifer their father must looke to have such part and portion as their father hath vvhose example and as it vvere footesteps in this arrogant and Satanical presumption and solifidian confidence they folow Of tuitching Christ corporally and spiritually The Argument M. B. guilefully magnifieth the spiritual manducation by faith to exclude the spiritual manducation ioyned with corporal manducation in the sacrament The definition of faith geven by S.
drinke in deed He that eateth my flesh and â—â—keth my blud abideth in me I in him If these be Christ owne vvords and if to have life everlasting to be raised that life in the last day if to abide in Christ and Christ â—â— abide in vs be some profite and al this Christ him â—â— ascribeth directly to his flesh which is the chief and principal instrument conioyned vvith the diuinitie vvhereby God vvorketh these effects vvhat Iewish impudencie â— infidelitie is it to say that Christs flesh profiteth nothing which flesh geveth life to the whole world Doubtles â—â— Christs flesh had profited nothing Christ vvould neâ—â— haue takeÌ„ flesh nor come in to the world vvhich he diâ— to this end that in his flesh by his flesh he miâ—hâ— coÌ„dâ—â—â— sinâ—e that by his flesh he might make an end of that â—â—â—â—â— vvhich vvas ether betwene Iew and Gentil or â—â—â— and man and in the body of his flesh â— as the Apostle speaketh â—â—â—ght reconcile man to God and by the some 〈…〉 ouen for vs the vvay to heaven And therefore M. â— denying Christs flesh to be profitable vvere as goodâ—â—â—â— vvith our Familianes that Christ never came in 〈◊〉 but only in spirite and mystically and so al Christi 〈…〉 may say to him and of him vvith S. Iohn that he in not confessing that Christ came in slesh vvhich by plaine consequence he flatly denieth is roâ— of God but of the devil he is a very seduâ—er and an Antichrist A third collectioÌ„â—e maketh of like qualitie vvith the â—ormer in these words Suppose Christs body be not â—uâ— in the band â—â— mouth of thy body And wherefore should it Hâ—th he not appointed bread wine for the nurriture of thy body and may not they coÌ„tent â—ow Are they not sufficient to â—uâ—rish yeâ— to this earthly temporal life God â—ath appointed Christ to be deliuered to the inward mâ—uth of the sowle The flesh of Christ is not appointed to nurrish thy body but to nurrish thy sowle in the hope in the groweth of that immortal life And therefore I say suppose the flesh of Christ be not delivered to the land of thy body â—et is it delivered to that part this is should nurrish Here a man might demaunde of M. B. how he caÌ„ match these words vvith the last If Christs flesh profite nothing how nurrisheth it the sowle to life immortal If it may nurrish the sowle vvhy not the body or â—ow is Christ potent to profite the one and impotent to benefit the other Nay if it profite nothing how can it be beneficial ether to body or sowle Next the reader may marke how directly his vvords tend to denial of the rosurrectioÌ„ of our bodies which in deed is an opinion already much spread among these bretherne and this denial of our corporal communication vvith Christ helpeth it forward excedingly For as though there vvere no difference betwene the body of a man and of a beast both vvhich once dying should lie rotte eternally vvhat need Christs flesh saith he for the nurriture of our body May not bread and wine and flesh fish such other good cheere as vve have in Scotland content yow Are not the sufficient to nurrish yow to this earthly and temporal life Yes truly And if vve had no more to looke for but this earthly and temporal liâ—e vvhich belike is al that M. B. and his â—elow ministers care for then earthly and temporal vitailes vvould serve and suffise vs abundantly But vvhereas Christians have an other life vvhich they expect besides this earthly and temporal vvhereas they hope that not only their sowle but their body also shal enioy life immortal they can not content them selves vvith bread and wine and flesh and fish and such other belly cheere vvith vvhich these Sadduces and Epicures can nurrish their bodies to an earthly and temporal life there with wel content them selves looking no farther but they require such food such meate as feedeth both body and sowle to life eternal VVhich seing Christ promised and promised that to that end he vvould geve his owne body the bread of life vve therefore in respect hereof contemne this Geneva bakers bread and tapsters vvine and tel M. B. that in thus preaching he preacheth like an â—picure like Marcion like Cerdon like a number of his felow ministers and Gospellers of this age vvho vpon pretence of the immortalitie of the sowle deny the immortalitie resurrection of the body both vvhich our faviour by imparting his pretious body to both nurrisheth to life immortal and these vvicked and prophane Sadduces by denving that grace vnto the one take from it so great a help and instrument of eternitie immortalitie vvhich in time also they vvil doubtles deny and take from the other Hereof hath bene spoken before vvhere vvas shewed that the auncient fathers drevv from this coÌ„munication of Christs body vvith our body a very common and very effectual argument to prove the resurrection and immortalitie of our bodies Here let it suffise to vvarne the reader thus much that as of old in the primitive church Cerdon Marcion Basilides Carpocrates and such other Archheretikes denyed the resurrectioÌ„ of our bodies the Catholike fathers S. Ireneus S. Gregorius Nyssenus Tertullian S. Hilarie and others argued against them out of this Catholike veritie that our bodies being made partakers of Christs body in this B. sacrament vvere thereby assured of resurrection life eternal so in our daies not only Catholike vvriters bisshops but even Luther also the Lutherans accuse and condemne the Calvinists and Sacramentarieâ— as gilty of those damnable heresies because against the general faith of al the auncient fathers they denie to Christian men the corporal and real participation of Christs body VVhen as Zuinglius had reproved Luther for vvriting that Christs body cateÌ„ corporally nurrisheth and preserveth our bodies to the resurrection Luther at large defending this proposition both by the authoritie of Christ and of the auncient fathers in fine concludeth thus According to the old fathers our bodies are nurrished with Christs body and blud to the end our faith and hope may rest vpon a more sound foundation that our body naturally receiving the sacrament of Christs body shal also in the resurrection become incorruptible and immortal And for that cause Christ wil be naturally in vs saith Hilarie both in our sowle and also in our body according to his word Ioannis 6. VVhich thing because Zuinglius and OF colampadius denyed he therefore pronounceth sentence against them as plain infidels These gentil Sacramentaries saith Luther make a faire way to deny God Christ and al the articles of our Creed and for a great part of them they have begon already to beleeve nothing And certain it is that they tend to a verie Apostasie in this article of the resurrection Certum
and such like places is that Christ is not so in the world as for â—â—â— sake he was in the world 33. yeres poore afflicted mortal In this sense we truly vnderstand Christs words Me your shal not haue alwaies with yow For we haue not Christ as in the time of his dispensation be liued with his disciples and as they desired to have Christ always present in the external conuersatioÌ„ of this life Visibly as then he conuerseth not with vs he eateth not he drinketh not he sleepeth not he needeth not to be enterteyned in our howse or table or to be anoynted as Simon and Lazarus enterteyned him a certaine woman anoynted him The Apostles desired to haue in Christ carnal comforts and earthly benefites So Christ was not to remayne with them in the world So it was conuenient for them that he should depart should forsake the world and not be in the world In this sense the Apostle Paule saith that he knoweth no man no not Christ according to the flesh But these places and al other of like effect conclude no more then we graunt that Christ is not in the Eucharist after a wordly maner according to philosophical and earthly properties of a body as is to be circumscribed and shut vp in a place and such like qualities of this mortal and worldly life But yet truly he is with vs in his power and maiestie and most specially in the boly supper and that in his flesh and blud according to his owne worde Other arguments against the real presence ansvvered The Argument Five other arguments made against the real presence are answered It is not necessarie that al such things be present in the sacrament or administration of the sacrament as are signified by bread and wine the material parts thereof How it is horrible wickednes to eate Christs flesh how therefore such speech is vnderstood mystically spiritually yet without hindering the real presence but rather confirming it CHAP. 19. THE arguments proposed in the last chapter are M. B. his principal argumeÌ„ts which as very principal have bene heretofore pressed againe and againe by the greater Rabbines of the sacrameÌ„tarie synagoge and because they seeme consonant to humane reason and are beautified vvith the name of one auncient father of greatest estimation may seeme to cary some credit though being indifferently wayed they are very light and prove nothing The rest that folow are for the most part as I ghesse his owne For so the povertie and miserablenes of them maketh me to thinke One or other of them vvas at the beginning vsed by Zuinglius and Occolampadius but are al of one fashion and grace some Iudaical some heretical some founded vpon manifest lyes some plaire derogatorie to Christs glorie al sond and contemptible vvithout any pith vvhich therefore I vvil the more briefly runne ouer The first is The effect of the sacrameÌ„t is spiritual But of a corporal presence no spiritual effect can euer â—â—â—â— So this corporal presence must ay tend to a corporal end which is directly coÌ„trarie to the end why the sacrameÌ„t was instituted This argument is more meet for a Iew then a Christian It is as good against Christs real incarnation death and passion as against the sacrament For if a corporal presence of Christ can vvorke no spiritual effect then nether did his incarnation any good nor death nor passion The next If the bread â—e chaunged in to the body of Christ thâ—â— this sacrament wanteth a signe which is to nurrish vscorporally as the body of Christ doth spiritually But the accidents cannot nurrish vscorporally This argument is false in evenâ— part and parcel and flat repugnant to the last For 〈…〉 Christs corporal presence can not worke any spiritual effect vvhat need vve to have bread to signifie that And if Christs body being present can not nurrish spiritually much lesse can it absent as by M. B. his divers reasons and similitudes vve haue bene before instructed Secondarily the signe in the sacrament vvhich he and his felowes most vrge vvhich is to moue the external senses more properly is found in the external accidents then the internal substance vvhich no man can see and therefore can not be moued vvith the sight thereof by his eye to informe his mind of Christ the spiritual bread VVherefore as to a sacrament is required only that there be an external signe representing the internal gift so this is fully don by the external figure alone as the brasen serpent in the old testameÌ„t vvas a sacrameÌ„t of Christ very fully and sufficiently represented him albeit in that vvere no true substance and nature of a serpent but only the external shape Thirdly I demaund vvhere findeth M. B. in al the Euangelists in S. Paule in Christs words that this sacrament vvas appointed to signifie spiritual nurriture vvhich vvas in deed appointed to nurrish spiritually to life eternal Again it is false that the accidents in the sacrament do not nurrish and true it is that even in ordinarie food meat and drinke doth nurrish by reason and meane of the accidents Furthermore as the fathers teach vs that to the sacrament is required bread for this signification of spiritual nurriture so the same fathers tel vs and so doth S. Paule him self though not so plainly that the sacramental bread signifieth our mystical vnion and coniunction one vvith an other Our Lord saith S. Austin commended to vs his body in those things which of many are made one Of many vvheate cornes is made the bread of many grapes is made the vvine vvhich is also the similitude of S. Cyprian and very largely prosecuted in the English and Scottish communion vvhere thus the brothers and sisters singe And that vve should not yet forget VVhat good he to vs wrought A signe Christ left our eyes to tel that he our bodies bought in bread and vvine here visible c. VVhich signification is there artificially and Rhetorically thus dilated As once the corne did live and grow and vvas cut downe vvith sith And thresshed out vvith many stripes out from his huske to driue And as the mil vvith violence did teare it out so smale c. And as the ouen vvith fier hote did close it vp in heate c. So vvas the Lord in his ripe age cut downe by cruel death Again And as the grapes in pleasant tyme are pressed very sore a pitiful case And plucked downe vvhen they be ripe And let to grow no more So Christ his blud out pressed was c. Thus much for ech part in seueral now for conclusicâ— vvhat both these parts ioyntly signifie And as the cornes by vnitie in to one loaf is knit So is the Lord and his whole Church Though he in heauen sit As many grapes make but one wine So should vve be but one In faith and loue c. These significations and
to continue men not become vvemen or threaten them that except they stood fast in their new gospel they should never be able to passe from Scotland to Denmark ether on foote or horseback or vvalke in one day from Edinburgh to HierusaleÌ„ This is to foolish impious yet this is the very forme tenor of the scriptures by M. B. Calvins doctrine And as foolish and impious is Calvins answere to these and the like places that the Apostles Evangelists Christ and al scripture speake vnproperly therefore their speaches are now to be corrected by this vvorshipful squire and Evangelist of Gebenna or rather Gehenna And vvhat can be devised more pregnant and forcible against this then that vvhich the Apostle Paule vvriteth to the Hebrews that some vvho vvere endued vvith faith and that in the most high and excellent degree vvho vvere once illuminated after their illumination had tasted the heavenly gift were made partakers of the holy ghost had moreouer tasted the good word of God and powers of the world to come vvhich is to yeld them al the prerogatiues and tastings of Gods grace vvhich M. B. somtime talketh of and chalengeth to his elect yet these men so amply illuminated after al this fel from the faith yea fel in so desperate sort that as much as in them lay they crucified again the sonne of God made a mocke of him If true faith once had can never be lost vvhat commentarie vvil M. B. make of these vvords I omit to produce fathers of the primitive Church of vvhom no one from the first to the last ever dreamed of this CaluiniaÌ„ frensie Yet if M. B. have mind to see this in them refelled generally by scripture let him reade S. Austin vvho most of al other vvas by reason of the heresies of his tyme concerning grace exercised in this kind of argumeÌ„t he shal find inough to satisâ—â—e a reasonable man Certainly to geve men in this vvorld securitie assurance assurance I say not of hope but of faith that they shal not nor can perish eternally is to turne vpside downe and cleane invert the nature of humanitie and divinitie of heaven and earth of man and Angels it is to geve the crowne to one vvho yet is fighting and hath not obteyned the victorie to geve him the garland vvho yet is running his race and vncertain how to hold his course to put him in the sure port who yet is rowing on the sea and tossed vvith the vvaues thereof to geve mortal man in this life that reward for vvhich in this life vve labour and is proper to the next and by gods ordinance appointed for the blessed sowles and angels confirmed in grace that is in one vvord to make men beleeve they are already sure of heaven and salvation vvho by this very presumptioÌ„ are in the broad and most certain vvay to hel and eternal damnation But because if I should proceed in this sort vvith the rest of these two last sermons I perceive I should fal in to that tedious prolivitie vvhich I most covet to avoid I vvil therefore only vvrite downe shortly M. B. his strauÌ„ge assertions concerning faith and vvorks adding for confutation no other authoritie then his owne vvhich I wil likewise put downe so nigh as may be in his owne vvords but alwayes in his owne sense And let this stand for the first The first Faith depends on good life and conscience and so vvith the losse thereof faith and saluation is lost Contra Faith once had can never be lost vvhatsoever a manâ— life is For God never reuokes or takes away the gift of faith which once he hath geven Faith shal never vtterly decay perish out of the hart wherein it makes once residence II. Faith is the onlâ— moven and instrument whereby we applie Christ vnto our sowles And there is in the scripture no other instrument of applying Christ to vs but this Contra. Love of Christ is an instrument vvhereby vve apprehend and grip Christ better then by faith even as the meate vvhich vve eate tast better nurrisheth our body then that vve only feed our eye vvithal III. VVhere the conversation is not holy let men speake what they wil there the hâ—râ— is defiled there this true and liuely faith hes no place Contra. Be our conuersation never so vvicked howsoeuer â—â—â— bodies be losed to al dissolution faith ever remaineth the fier of true faith is never put out suppose it be covered IIII. The gift of faith where ever it be in what hart soeuer is never idle but perpetually working working wel by love and charitie VVhere ever it be it is not dead but lively that is Al men vvhich have faith are perpetually vvorking vvel by love and charitie Contra. In some of our great men their oppressions of the poore their deadly feids with their owne companions burst out in sick an high measure as shew that they advise not wel with their consciences wherein depends faith And therefore the Lord seing them take so litle tent to their consciences spoiles them of faith Then some men vvhich have faith vvorke not perpetually vvel by love charitie V. Sinne severeth a man from God God can not dwel in a man that alway committeth sinnes Contra. The best men every day and howre commit grosse sinnes Yet the faithful in their greatest dissolutions fal they to murther and adulterie as Dauid did they never leese the spirite of God So then God dwelleth in them notwithstanding their continual sinnes VI. A Christian man living dissolutely in sinne can not have faith and confidence in the mercy of God For how may be have faith in the mercy of God whose conscience witnesseth to him daily that for his manifold sinnes Gods wrath is kindled against him A hurt conscience man ever doubt and the more we doubt the lesse is our persuasion Na question so long as the sense of gods anger and feeling of my offenses bides I can not have a starke persuasion that he wil be merciful to me and so yow can not have a right faith vvhich vvith yow is a starke and strong persuasion of gods mercy Contra. A Christian man living never so dissolutely can never leese faith The spoonks whereof worke in him continual morse and makes him cal to God for mercy every day And â—â—â—â— prayer is a certain argument of the right faith and beleefe in God For I can not speake to him nor pray to him in whom I trust not Ergo a brother sinning never so much not only may haue but also actually hath faith cofidece in the mercy of God For els he could not pray vnto him Again In despite of the devil and the corruption which is in vs and M. B. vvho teacheth the contrarie this faith shal never perish and then necessarily such a man hath a stark