Ribera further by the girdle which compasseth the loines understandeth the continencie and single life of Priests out of Beda Contra. 1. If it had any such signification wherefore was not single life injoyned Aarons sons first to whom this girdle was prescribed 2. Beda indeed hath such a collection but he addeth withall Quod videlicet genus virtutis nulli per legem Dei necessario imperatum sed voluntaria est devotione Deo offerendum Which kinde of vertue is necessarily injoyned none by the law of God but it must with a voluntarie devotion be offered unto God the Lord thus saying hereof Non omnes capiunt verbum hoc All cannot receive this saying c. Why then doe they impose necessarily upon their Priests solitarie and single life which forced chastitie hath brought forth and yet doth many foule fruits among them as adulterie fornication Sodomitrie and such like uncleannesse 6. Morall Observations 1. Observ. Apparell commendeth not one to God Vers. 2. THou shalt make holie garments for Aaron c. glorious and beautifull Wee reade of divers glorious garments made in the world As of the costly vesture of Alcisthenes the Sybarite which Dionysius sold for 120. talents unto the Carthaginians Demetrius King of Macedon had a robe set forth sumptuously with the representation of the heaven and starres which no King durst put on quòd invidiosa nimis esset impendii magnificentia because it was too envious because of the magnificent cost But Aarons glorious apparell exceeded all these not so much in the sumptuous cost and cunning workmanship as in respect of the institution which was from God and the signification which was to set forth the glorious Priesthood of Christ and as this was typicall in it selfe so morally it shewed with what varietie of vertues first the Ministers of God then all his faithfull people and worshippers should be adorned not with putting on of gold or outward apparell but with the spirituall ornaments of the inward man as S. Peter teacheth how women should be adorned 1 Pet. 3.4 2. Observ. Ministers must be adorned with veritie of doctrine and holinesse of life Vers. 30. VRim and Thummim Which signifie knowledge and perfection whereby the Minister and man of God is set forth that he ought to be adorned with soundnesse of doctrine and integritie of conversation B. Babing As Saint Paul requireth that his Bishop for the one should be apt to teach for the other unreproveable 1 Tim. 3. 3. Observ. Ministers must not be dumbe or idle Vers. 35. ANd his sound shall be heard c. Gregorie well noteth upon this that the Priest dieth if his sound be not heard when he goeth in and out before the Lord Iram contra se occulti judicis excitat si sine sonìtu praedicationis incedit Hee stirreth up the anger of the secret Judge against him who goeth on without the sound of preaching c. So the holy Apostle saith Wee is unto me if I preach not the Gospell 1 Cor. 9.16 This maketh against two sort of Ministers the ignorant and unskilfull that cannot sound forth the voice of preaching and the idle and slothfull that doe not CHAP. XXIX 1. The Method and Argument THe Tabernacle with the parts thereof being thus finished with the garments and apparell of the Priests now followeth the consecration of them in this Chapter which consisteth of two parts first of the consecration of the Priests to vers 37. Then the sanctifying of the Altar and Tabernacle for the publike service of God In the consecration 1. Is set downe the preparation it selfe both of the things wherewith they should be consecrated to vers 5. then of the persons Aaron and his sons who are first attired and apparelled with their severall rayments to vers 10. 2. The consecration followeth first of Aaron and the rest for that time to vers 28. then the generall manner is prescribed to be observed afterward vers 28. to vers 37. In the speciall consecration for that time 1. The manner is prescribed how the calfe or bullocke shall be used 1. How and where he should be killed vers 10 11. 2. What shall be done with the bloud vers 12. with the fat vers 13. with the flesh and skin vers 14. 2. How the ramme of burnt offering should be sacrificed is shewed vers 16. to vers 19. 3. The ramme of consecration which was the third beast must be thus bestowed 1. The bloud part must be laid upon certaine parts of Aaron with part the Altar and Aaron and his sons with their garments must be sprinkled vers 20 21. 2. The flesh and parts some must bee burnt upon the Altar with the manner how they must bee first put into Aarons hands and shaken to and fro before the Lord to vers 26. some as the breast and shoulder shall be for Aaron and his sons to vers 28. In the generall prescription these things are declared 1. The perpetuall law of the heave offering vers 28. 2. The use of the Priestly garments vers 29 30. 3. How the ramme should be dressed and eaten to vers 34. 4. And nothing must be reserved vers 34. The second generall part belongeth unto the daily and publike service of God 1. The instrument thereof is declared the Altar with the manner of consecration to vers 38. 2. The matter of the daily offering two lambs one at morning the other at even to vers 42. 3. The place is described at the doore of the Tabernacle vers 42 43. 4. The Ministers vers 44. 5. The effect Gods dwelling among them vers 45 46. 2. The divers readings Vers. 1. Take a young bullocke under the damme or sucking I. ben bakar the son of a bullocke A.P.H. better than a young calfe B.G. for here ben bachar is not interpreted phar of it selfe signifieth a young calfe or than a young bullocke from the oxen V.S. or a calfe from the heard L.C. See qu. 2. following Vers. 5. And shall gird them with the broidered girdle of the Ephod I.B.C.P. or broidered gard of the Ephod G.V.A. better than thou shalt gird them with a girdle L. for here Ephod is wanting or thou shalt couple the breastplate to the superhumerall or Ephod S. for here bechesheb with the broidered gard or girdle is omitted Vers. 10. Shall stay his hands upon the head of the calfe fulcient A. or shall rest with his hands upon c. better than put to their hands V. or joyne their hands upon c. P. or put on their hands c. G.L.S.C. samac signifieth sustentare to stay Oleaster Vers. 14. It is sinne S.A.H. c. that is an offering for sinne I.G.B. as S. Paul saith in the same sense that Christ was made sinne for us 2 Cor. 5.21 V. better than it is an expiation C. or it is for sinne L. for is added the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 chatath sinne Vers. 25. And thou shalt burne them in the
Ministers of the Gospell to bee distinguished by some distinct apparell in their ministerie For answer and satisfaction unto this demand I will produce two grave testimonies of two learned Writers in this age Marbachius of late the Professor of Divinitie in Straughsborow and Gallasius not long since a Minister of the Church of Geneva Marbachius thus writeth In Ecclesia omnia decenter fieri debent ad aedificationem c. In the Church all things ought to be done decently and to edification Itaque tali vestitu utendum qui non sit offendiculo c. Therefore such a garment must be used as is not offensive but bringeth some commendation and authoritie to them which minister and may discerne and distinguish them from other men Gallasius also thus delivereth his judgement upon this place Ego quidem fateor hoc ad decorem pertinere ut ordines in politia distinguantur c. I confesse that this appertaineth to comelinesse that degrees should be distinguished in the Common-wealth neither is the Gospell against decencie and order but rather helpeth and maintaineth them Sed nego ad verbi aut sacramentorum administrationem vestem lineam c. But I denie that the linen garment or pall belongeth to the administration of the word or Sacraments I would not truly have any stirres or tumult moved in the Church for the use of externall things seeing it is indifferent yet the superstition into which men are readie to fall and the abuse I hold to be condemned We must also take heed lest while we tolerate things indifferent or are constrained to winke at those things which cannot be amended wee detract from other mens libertie Thus farre Gallasius of this matter 2. Controv. That we offend in our best works Vers. 38. THat Aaron may beare the iniquitie of the offerings The people then sinned even in their religious works which sheweth in ipsis benefactis nostris peccatorum labem inesse c. that even in our best works there is some blemish of sin which cannot be acceptable unto God but for the worthinesse and mediation of the true high Priest Christ Jesus whom Aaron prefigured Simler To the same purpose also Calvin Discamus nostra obsequia ubi in conspectum Dei veniunt peccato permixta esse Let us learne that even our service when it commeth into Gods sight to bee examined is mixt with sin and is onely sanctified by Christ c. So the Prophet Isaiah saith chap. 64.6 All our righteousnesse is as a stained clout Hereby then appeareth the error of the Romanists who hold that a just man in his good works doth not sinne so much as venially Concil Trident. sess 6. can 25. See more hereof Synops. Centur. 4. err 70. 3. Controv. Against merit in good works Vers. 38. TO make them acceptable before the Lord. Tostatus saith here that the Priest was accepted of God and the Lord was well pleased with him because he ascribed all holinesse unto God as it was writen in his forehead Holinesse to Iehovah Hoc autem protestari meritorium est Deum nobis placatum reddimus And to protest this is meritorious and by this meanes we doe pacifie and appease God toward us qu. 19. Contra. 1. The former doctrine that the people sinned in their very offerings in their best works which are spotted and blemished with some imperfection or other overthroweth this error for that which meriteth at Gods hand must be perfect our best works then being imperfect are not meritorious Therefore Calvin much better here inferreth This place teacheth us Quicquid honorum operum Deo offerre studemus adeo nihil mercedis mereri c. That whatsoever good works we offer unto God they are so farre from meriting any reward that they make us guiltie before God unlesse the holinesse of Christ wherewith God is pleased doe procure pardon for them c. 2. The Scripture evidently testifieth this as Dan. 9.8 We doe not present our supplications before thee for our owne righteousnesse So Luk. 17.10 When ye have done all say ye we are unprofitable servants we have done that which was our dutie to doe If then we are unprofitable servants in our best service we are farre from meriting or deserving any thing and if we doe no more than our bounden dutie nor yet all that we have no reason to expect any reward beyond our desert See more hereof Synops. Centur. 4. err 79. 4. Controv. Against the Popes triple crowne Vers. 36. THou shalt make a plate of pure gold Ribera following Iosephus who speaking of this plate of gold saith Hunc aurea corona triplici circundabat c. He beset round the Priests miter or bonnet with a threefold crowne c. hereupon thus inferreth Hinc factum arbitror ut summus pontifex triplicem in capite coronam gerat c. Hence it is that the chiefe Priest meaning the Pope doth now beare a threefold crowne upon his head c. And he addeth further Quamvis hujusmodi corona c. Although such a crowne was received from the Apostle Peter which is yet to bee seene in S. Peters Church which Silvester shewed unto Constantine c. This he saith S. Peter used by the instinct of the Spirit that the veritie might be answerable to the figure that Christs high Priest might weare that which the high Priest the figure of Christ did weare Contra. 1. All this is grounded upon an uncertaine text for there is no mention made here of a triple crowne it is but Iosephus report without any warrant out of the text the golden plate indeed is called the holy crowne chap. 29.30 But of a threefold crowne there is not one word 2. They may be ashamed to abuse the world with such foppish fables who ever will beleeve that S. Peter ever did weare a triple crowne or that any of the Apostles used any such worldly pompe whose glorie was their povertie and contempt of the world their crowne their sufferings their obedience to powers and subjection their renowne 3. And if there had beene such a glorious crowne it had belonged rather to S. Paul than to Saint Peter for hee was the Apostle of the Gentiles the other of the circumcision 4. And if any such crowne had beene then it is more like that Constantine gave it to Silvester whose donation they pretend for their great soveraigntie and privileges than that Silvester first shewed it to him 5. And if that indeed be Peters triple crowne which yet is to be seene why doth the Pope refuse to weare that but rather maketh choice of a massie triple crowne of gold and precious stone 6. I had thought that Aaron had beene a figure of Christ not of the Pope and temporall things doe not prefigure temporall one triple crowne another but that outward crowne shadowed forth the spirituall Kingdome and regall dignitie of Christ. 5. Controv. Of the single life of Priests Vers. 40. ANd thou shalt make them girdles
verse the negative particle lo not must be supplyed which is but once in the beginning of the verse expressed This interpretation we preferre before either that of the Hebrewes 1. who referre this verse to that which followeth and joyne it not with that which goeth before but make this sense that as yet there were no plants or herbs that appeared above the earth but lay yet hid till God sent raine whereby the earth was prepared for the creation of man and the plants watered so R. Sel. But this is a vaine conceit for upon the third day trees were made which appeared above the earth and the earth having beene so lately covered with the waters was yet moist enough 2. Either that of Eugubinus who saith it rained the second day and then the plants were brought forth the third for upon the second day the waters were gathered together from covering the earth so that no raine was then needfull 3. Mercerus distinguisheth the times the 5. verse hee understandeth of the first growing of the plants in the creation which was done without raine or dew but the 6. verse hee referreth to that ordinary course which God appointed afterward by dewes and raines to refresh the earth 4. Musculus will have the 6. verse of the ascending of vapours to be understood of the very time of creation that God used those helps of nature but this were to tye God unto meanes wherefore I take it with Iunius to be an explanation of the former verse that it had neither yet rained nor any mist had ascended when God onely by his word caused the plants to grow out of the earth this is the exposition of R. Saadia which Kimâ—i preferreth before all the rest QVEST. IX Whether Paradise were terrestriall Vers. 8. THe Lord planted a garden eastward in Eden c. Hierome readeth for eastward à principiâ— from the beginning whereas the word is Kedem the East translated by the Septuagint 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so that Hieromes conceit that God made Paradise before the heaven and earth tradit in 2. gen is grounded upon the false interpretation of this place and how could Paradise which was upon the earth be planted before the earth was founded 2. Their conceit is removed that imagine Paradise to bee no terrene or corporall place but to be spiritually understood as Philo lib. de mund opâ—fic and Origen whom Epiphanius confuteth by this reason that where there are true rivers as Euphrates which is confessed of all to bee one of the rivers of Paradise where were also very trees and plants there Paradise must bee a terrestriall place epist. ad Ioann Hierosâ—l 3. Neither can the whole earth be taken for Paradise as some have thought because it is said here to bee planted in Eden which was the name of a speciall country Esech 27.23 Harah Canneth Eden are joyned together QVEST. X. Where Paradise was situate LIkewise for the situation of Paradise 1. it was neither in a remote place beyond the Ocean which opinion is attributed to Ephrem 2. nor a place higher than all the earth Damasc. lib. 2. de fid orthodox c. 14. 3. nor next unto heaven as Rupertus de Trinitat c. 37. 4. nor reaching up to the Moone as some other have imagined 5. nor in the aire though not so high as the Moone as Alexander Hales and Tostatus 6 nor under the Equinoctiall Bonavent in 2. senten c. 17. for these rivers Tigris and Euphrates which flowed out of Paradise and the country Eden where Paradise was came not neare the Equinoctiall and they are knowne to be in Asia not in any remote and unknowne countrey in earth not in the aire or next to the Moone All these are ridiculous childish fancies and need no long confutation QVEST. XI Of the tree of life Vers. 9. THe tree of life c. 1. This was a visible tree planted in the midst of Paradise in a visible place not spiritually or allegorically to be understood as Origen thinketh 2. neither is it called the tree of life because it was able to give immortality and to preserve from death for ever as Tostatus or onely because it was able to preserve man from death till such time as hee should bee translated to immortality as Scotus in 2. lib. sent dist 19. qu. 1. and Thomas with others 4. Neither need it bee disputed whether the tree of life had this power to preserve from death by a supernaturall gift as Bonaventure or by a naturall faculty as Hugo Thomas Pererius upon this place 5. For it is evident that this tree had no power to give immortality at all by the taste of the fruit thereof 1. because that no corruptible food can make the body incorruptible but the fruit of this tree could not nourish nature without corruption and alteration and without nourishment it could not give life to the body 2. Againe man had by his creation power given him to dye if he had not sinned wherfore immortality was the gift of his creation not effect of the eating of the tree 3. And if it could have giveÌ„ immortality it must have had a power to preserve from sin for by sinning man became mortall so that if it could not defend him from sin it was no more the tree of life in regard of the effect than any other tree of the garden for if he had not sinned he should not have dyed what fruit soever he had eaten of that only tree of knowledge of good and evill excepted 6. Then our opinion is this that it was called the tree of life not so much for the operation though we confesse it might give strength and vertue also to the body Mercer but chiefly for the signification because it was both a signe of life received from God and a symbole of Christ who is our true life and herein we approve rather the opinion of Augustine Eugubinus in Cosmopeia who thinketh it was called the tree of life not effective but significative not effectually but significatively as a signe of true immortality which he should receive of God if he continue in obedience First it is the tree of life as the other was of knowledge of good and evill which was not so called because it gave knowledge but was a seale unto them of their miserable knowledge which they should get by experience in their transgression Magister lib. 3. distinct 17. therefore the tree of life must be so called because it was a seale and pledge of life secondly thus the Scripture significatively and simbolically expoundeth the tree of life Prov. 5.18 Wisdome which is Christ is a tree of life Revel 2.7 To him that overcommeth will I give to eat of the tree of life see more of this Synops 17. cont err 5. QVEST. XII Of the tree of knowledge of good and evill vers 9. THe tree of knowledge of good and evill First we affirme that this was a visible materiall tree not
exercise his strength as Augustine againe saith Administrat omâ—ia qua creavit ut etiam ipsa proprios motus exercere sinat God doth so governe all things which he created that yet hee suffereth them to exercise their owne motions 3. God might justly suffer this to be done because hee did know how to turne Adams fall unto good Deuâ— permisit hominem tentari quâ—m sciebut esse casurum quid simul videbat eo casu sâ—â—â—ti posse ad misericordiam c. God suffered man to be tempted whom he knew should fall because he saw how to use his fall to declare his mercy and justice while he justly punished some out of the same damned masse and delivered others in mercy Doct. VI. Adam not damned WHereas v. 15. a promise is made concerning Christ that the seede of the woman should breake the serpents head from hence we infer that our first patents though they sinned yet were by faith in the Messiah to come restored and not utterly condemned which was the heresie of the Tatiaâ—es August de haeres c. 23. In the booke of wisdome we read that wisdome preserved the first father of the world and brought him out of his offence c. 10.1 which is agreeable to the Canonicall scripture because Adam is called the sonne of God Luke 3.38 he was not then the child of death and hell everlastingly to perish Doct. VII Wherein Adam transgressed NOw because carnall men doe extenuate Adams sinne that he was cast out of Paradise for eating an apple I will briefly shew the greatnes of our first parents transgression wherein many sins concurred 1. There was in them both incredulitie in not beleeving Gods words to be true 2. Vnthankfulnesse in not being contented with their estate 3. Pride in desiring to be like unto God 4. Wantonnes in sinning without any necessitie having all the trees in the garden beside to eare of 5. There was the sinne of gluttonie in pampering the desire of the belâ—â—e 6. Disobedience in transgressing the commandement 7. Curiositie in coveting to know the operation of the fruit in bringing them to knowledge 8. Presumption in that they presumed of Gods mercie that they should not die though they did eate 9. Then followed the concupiscence and rebellion of the flesh in being ashamed of their nakednesse 10. They excused their sinne 11. They are guiltie of homicide in bringing death not only upon themselves but all their posteritie 12. Beside Eva seduced her husband 13. Adam sinned in his inordinate affection to his wife in listning to her 14. The easines of the commandemeÌ„t maketh the transgression more heinous as Augustine well noteth answering to this question why God forbad them to eate of that tree Si bona est quare non tango si mala est quare in Paradise ideo in Paradiso est quia bona est sed nolâ— tangâ—â— quiâ— obedienteÌ„ te volâ— if it be good why doe I not touch it if it be evill why is it in Paradise therefore it is in paradise because it is good but I will not have thee touch it because I would have thee obedient God could not then make better triall of mans obedience than in forbidding that which was good Places of confutation Confut I. Infidelity not pride the first sinne of our parent 1. THe opinion of the Popish writers is that pride was the first sinne that Eva was tempted unto because Satan saith unto them yee shall bee as gods but it is rather evident that their first sinne was infidelitie first Satan telleth them ye shall not die at all and so perswadeth them not to give credit to the word of God for if they had verely beleeved that to come to passe which was threatned they would never have given any credit to Satan Confut. II. Our parents lost not their faith 2. BEllarmine also holdeth that our first parents in their transgression lost their faith because by the seducement of Satan they beleeved not what God said unto them ye shall not die Ans. 1. It followeth not if in this one act of faith they failed that therefore totally their faith was extinguished he that shal be seduced in one article or point of faith is he presently stripped of all faith 2. It was no formall infidelitie as though wittingly they rejected Gods word but they were materially deceived onely and their sudden violent affection over-shadowed their knowledge judgement 3. So Peter denied Christ through feare and frailtie yet in his judgement he could not so at once cast off all opinion of Christ hâ—s faith was shaken and winnowed but it failed not as our Saviour testifieth of him that he had praied for him that his faith faile not Luke 23.22 and so was the case in our first parents Confut. III. Not Marie but Christ brake the serpents head 3. vers 15. THe vulgar latine translation readeth shee shall breake thy head c. which the Popish writers understand of the virgin Mary as Pererius doubteth not to give this marginal note B. virgo contrivit caput serpentis the blessed Virgin did break the head of the serpent and Bellarmine also justifieth this translation whereas in the original it is his ipsum it in the neuter gender which must be referred to seed the Septuagint and the Chalde read he in the masculine understanding it of Christ for none else but Christ broke the serpents head Confut. IIII. The tree of life could not actually give life but was a symbole of it 4. vers 22. LEst he take of the tree of life and live for ever Bellarmine would proove from hence that this tree by eating the fruit therof might bring true immortalitie Ans. 1. As the Lord saith by way of derision man is become as one of vs to know good and evill So in the same sense is this other part of the sentence uttered that as a man simply thought to get knowledge by eating of the one so he might imagine to obtaine life by the other 2. For if Adam might have lived by eating of this tree now after he had sinned how would that other saying have taken effect in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death Gen. 2.17 These speeches had beene contrarie the one to the other 3. It was therefore the tree of life as the other was of the knowledge of good and evill that is significative non effective not in operation â—ut in signification it was a signe or symbole of life received from God and by Gods gift should have beene â—reserved if a man had not sinned and therefore man beeing deprived of life lost also the signe thereof Places of Exhortation and practice 1. WE have here set forth unto us from v. 1. to v. 7. the degrees of tentation 1. the suggestion of Satan 2. delectation the woman saw the tree was pleasant c. 3. Consent shee tooke of the fruit 4. The effecting of the thing desired shee did eate
60. yeares Gen. 25.26 and Iacob was an 130. when hee went into Aegypt Gen. 47.9 which all make 215. yeares the other 215. yeares may be accounted thus Cahath the sonne of Levi went downe with Iacob into Aegypt who as Eusebius thinketh begat Amram at 70. yeares Amram also at 70. might beget Moses who lived 80. yeares before the departure of the Israelites out of Aegypt the whose summe maketh 220. yeares from the which we must detract five yeares of the age of Cahath when he came downe with Iacob into Aegypt so there remaineth 215. yeares which is the time of the sojourning of Israel in Aegypt ex Mercer 3. Though the Israelites dwelt in Aegypt 215. yeares yet they were not kept in thraldome and affliction above an 130. nor yet so much for all the time of Iosephs government after Iacob came into Aegypt must be accepted which was 71. yeares for Ioseph was then 36. yeare old 30. yeere old hee was when he stood before Pharaoh and expounded his dreame Genes 41.49 and the seven plentifull yeares were past and two of famine Gen. 45.11 And Ioseph lived in all 110. yeares if then 39. bee deducted from 110. there will remaine 71. yeares all this while Israel was not afflicted Beside whereas their affliction began not till Ioseph and all his brethren were dead Exod. 1.6 and Levi supposed to bee 44. yeare old when he came into Aegypt lived 137. yeare Exod. 5.16 was 39. yeares in Aegypt which being subtracted from 215. yeares the time of their dwelling in Aegypt there will remaine not above 122. yeares which was the time of their thraldome and bondage in Aegypt 4. Their foure hundred yeares of servitude in a land not theirs 1. must not be counted from Abrahams first comming into the land of Canaan as Chrysostome for from thence the 430. yeares mentioned Exod. 12.40 must take beginning and the text is thy seed shall be a stranger we must then begin to count from the birth of Isaak Abrahams seed 2. Neither is it like that God afterward seeing their extreme affliction shortned this time of 400. yeares which also is Chrysostomes conjecture for Gods word altereth not and S. Steven Act. 7.6 abridging this story setteth the same time of 400. yeares not of 430. as some latine copies have wherein the translation is corrupted 3. Neither is the land of Canaan here to be excluded as Oleaster thinketh for although it was promised to Abraham for an inheritance they were as yet strangers therin for Abraham had not so much as a breadth of a foot Act. 7.5 and Iacob counted himselfe a pilgrime and stranger there Gen. 47.9 4. Neither to make up these foure hundred yeares need we with Iosephus to count 170. yeares betweene Iosephs death and Moses birth which was not above 64. yeares Iosephus confuting Cheremons errour that would have Ioseph and Moses both of one time falleth into another rour himselfe 5. Wherefore this time of 400. yeares must begin at Isaaks birth though precisely they were 405. yeares which few odde yeares in so great a summe maketh no great difference Againe this land not theirs is not only Aegypt but Canaan and where the text rehearseth these three they shall be strangers serve and be entreated evill wee must joyntly not severally apply all these to the time limited of 400. yeares that this whole time they were either strangers or served or were afflicted and so Augustine well understandeth qu. 47. in Exod. Mercer QVEST. XV. How diversly a generation is taken Vers. 16. IN the fourth generation they shall come hither c. A generation is sometime taken for the whole life of man and continuance of an age as Matth. 24.34 this generation shall not passe till all these things be fulfilled that is some now alive may live to see it sometime it is taken for the succession of persons as Matth. 1.17 sometime for a certaine number of yeeres as for the space of ten yeares Baruch 6.2 the time of the captivity in Babylon which was 70. yeares is limited to seven generations for 20. yeares Euseb. lib. de praepar 10. c. ult for 33. yeares Herod lib. 2. for 30. Diodor. lib. 3. c. 13. for an 100. Dyonis Halicar lib. 1. Rom. antiquit According to these divers acceptions 1. Some doe understand here a generation for an 100. yeares but that cannot be for the Israelites came not out in the fourth hundred yeare but in the beginning of the fifth Iun. 2. Some take it for the space of seventy yeares out of the Psal. 90.10 and so after the Israelites had dwelt three generations that is thrice 70. yeares 220. yeares in Aegypt then in the fourth 70. yeare they entred the land of Canaan sic Iunius But the best computation of these generations is from the succession of persons yet we must neither begin from the eldest persons that entred into Aegypt as Cajetanus and Lyranus reckon these foure generations from Iacob to Iudas from Iudas to Pharez Pharez to Ezron Ezron to Caleb so also Mercerus which make foure generations which computation is a great errour for that Caleb which entred to Canaan was not the sonne of Ezron but of Iephunne Ios. 14.6 long after the other Caleb for we reade of three Calebs the first the son of Ezron 1 Chron. 2.9 the second the sonne of Hur ibid. v. 50. the third the sonne of Iephunne 1 Chron. 4.15 from Iudah to this Caleb were six or seven generations neither could Ezron bee the father of this Caleb for Ezron came downe with Iacob into Aegypt Gen. 46.12 and Caleb was about 40. yeare old when the Israelites came out of Aegypt Iosu. 14.7 and the time of the Israelites abode in Aegypt was 215. yeares take from that the 40. yeares of Calebs age and suppose Ezron to have beene but five yeares old at his comming to Aegypt by this account he should be 170. yeare old before he begat Caleb whereas Caleb the sonne of Ezron was borne long before his father was 60. yeares old 1 Chron. 2.21 wherefore that Caleb which lived with Iosua was not the sonne of Ezron Neither must we account only those generations that were borne in Aegypt as Perer. for so wee shall have but three generations Caath begat Amram in Aegypt Amram Aaron Aaron Eleazer who divided the land but the right reckoning is to begin from the youngest of those generations that went downe to Aegypt and so from Kohath to Eleazer are foure generations Cohath begat Amram Amram begat Aaron Aaron Eleazer 4. But Philo his allegoricall conceit I let passe who by the fourth generation understandeth the fourth age of mans life when after the simplicity of his childhood the riot of his youth the instruction of his middle age he commeth to yeares of gravity and judgement for who seeth not how unproper and disagreeing to this historicall prophecie such mysticall collections are QVEST. XVI Why God spared the wickednesse of the Amorites Vers. 16.
time about 180. yeares of age for it was 170. yeares since she came first with Rebeckah into Canaan when shee may well bee supposed to have beene 50. yeare old having the charge and government of Rebeckah 3. It is very like that Rebeckah was now departed for otherwise Deborah would not have left her so long as shee lived 4. There is no mention of Rebeckahs death not because she was buried obscurely and in the night as the Hebrews imagine Isaack being blind and none to bury her but Esau but it is the use of Scripture to make rare mention of the death of women in this place Deborahs death is recorded as an accident that fell out by the way Mercer QUEST V. How Deborah came to be in Iacobs company NOw whereas the question is moved how Deborah came to be in Iacobs company 1. Neither is it like that after she had accompanied Rebeckah into Canaan she went back againe and was now desirous to goe aad see Rebeckah as Chrysostome for shee was sent with Rebeckah to remaine with her 2. Neither did she goe with Iacob at the first when he went into Mesopotamia as Calvin for he was alone in Bethel 3. Neither was she sent as a messenger to fetch Iacob out of Mesopotamia as the Hebrewes for he returned at Gods commandement not at his mothers call 4. Neither as Ramban is it to be supposed that Rebeckah had more nurses then one 5. But it is like that Deborah was sent to meet Iacob being returned Mercer or went to him of her owne accord after Rebeckahs death Cajetan QUEST VI. Of the number of the visions wherein God appeared to Iacob Vers. 9. Againe God appeared unto Iacob c. Not as though this were the second vision in all which Iacob had but it was another vision beside that mentioned in the beginning of the chapter where he is bid to goe up to Bethel or it was the second time that God appeared unto him in Bethel for otherwise to count all the visions that Iacob had this was in number the seventh 1. God appeared unto him in Bethel in the vision of the ladder 2. When in a dreame he was shewed the parti-coloured sheepe Genes 31.11 3. When the Lord bade him returne into his owne countrey Gen. 31.3 4. When the Angels met him Gen. 32.2 5. When the Angell wrestled with him 6. When God bid him goe up to Bethel 7. God appeared againe unto him in Bethel Perer. QUEST VII Whether the name of Israel is here new imposed or but renewed Vers. 10. THy name shall be no more called Iacob but Israel c. 1. Neither iâ— this the same vision which Iacob had when he wrestled with the Angel as Oleaster because the same name is imposed for the text saith that God appeared againe to Iacob vers 9. that is in Bethel 2. Neither as Hierome thinketh was the name of Iacob onely foretold then and imposed now tradit in Genes as Peters name is designed Iohn 1. but actually given him Matth. 12.16 Thom. Anglic. for before this Iacob is twice called by the name of Israel Genes 33.10 and Gen. 34.7 3. Neither as Tostatus and Lyranus thinke is the same name imposed in both places but upon divers reasons for in the first place hee is called Israel because hee prevailed with God and therefore much more with men to signifie his fortitude in the active life but here is named Israel that is seeing God in respect of the contemplative life the which he had now atchived But there appeared no difference at all in the reason and signification of the name for as there by the name Israel hee is comforted and fortified against Esau so here against the Canaanites that thought to have revenged the slaughter of the Sichemites 4. Wherefore wee say that the same name upon the like occasion is here imposed and that this is but a repetition and confirmation of the other vision and thereupon Iacob being confident doth now more openly call himselfe Israel Mercer Iun. And so it is not unusuall in Scripture to have the same promises often repeated as those made to Abraham of the multiplying of his seed and possessing of the land of Canaan which were often revived and renewed as Gen. 15.17.22 Perer. QUEST VIII How it is said thy name shall bee no more called Iacob FVrther whereas the Lord saith thy name shall be no more called Iacob and yet hee is afterward called Iacob 1. Augustine thinketh that he was called Iacob in respect of this life onely where he should wrestle as his name signifieth with many temptations but hee was called Israel in respect of the life to come quast 114. in Gen. But this solution beeing mysticall and this mutation of Iacobs name historicall satisfieth not Much like is the solution of Tostatus that he was called Iacob in respect of his active life but Israel for his contemplative neither is this answer sufficient to say he should be called by both names but in a diverse sense for the text denieth unto him the name of Iacob any more 3. Nor yet doe wee approve the solution of Cajetan Vatab. that for vltra no more put in tantum thou shalt not onely be called Iacob for thus the text is forced 4. Pererius thus interpreteth not that he should be so much called by the name Israel as have the thing thereby signified as strength and power with God as it is said of Christ he should be called Emanuel that is God with vs yet was not Christ so called who was indeed God with vs But this sense is not so proper for Iacob was usually called by the name of Israel 5. Therefore the meaning is rather this that although the name of Iacob should remaine yet the last was more honourable and excellent and should obscure that other Muscul. Mercer 1. In respect of the author the name Iacob was given by men the name Israel by God 2. In signification it was more excellent Iacob signifieth a supplanter because hee held Esau by the heele but Israel is interpreted one that prevailed with God 3. The name Israel was given to the whole nation and posteritie of Iacob who of Israel were called Israelites not of Iacob Iacobites QUEST IX What Kings came out of Iacobs loynes Vers. 11. KIngs shall come out of thy loynes c. 1. The Hebrewes specially referre it to Saul and Isboseth that were Kings of Benjamin and to the tribes of Ephraim and Manasses 2. But because that Saul and his house were rejected of God and the kingdome of Israel was but an usurpation it is specially to be applied to David and the other kings of Iudah Calvin 3. It may also be understood of the kings of the Gentiles converted to the faith who spiritually were borne of Iacob Mercer 4. These nations that came out of Iacobs loynes were the twelve tribes that multiplied increased as so many seueral nations QUEST X. How the land of Canaan is given to
21.22 2. The divers readings Vers. 7. Because of their exactors I.V.A.P.S. rather than taskmasters B.G. The word is derived of Nagash to exact oppresse Vers. 12. For I will be with thee I.V.A.P.S.B. rather than I will be with thee L. for here the causall particle for is wanting or Certainly I will be with thee G. chi signifieth for because This shall be a token unto thee that I have sent thee when thou has brought c. ye shall serve God upon this mountaine I.S.A.P. that is this vision which thou seest shall be a signe not as the most reade That this shall be a signe namely that which followeth and shall serve me G.B.V.L. for the perfect distinction athuah commeth betweene and that could not properly be a signe to confirme him presently which was to be fulfilled afterward Vers. 14. Eâ—ich which am hath sent me I. to whom consenteth Simlerus rather than I am that I am V. LS.B.G.X or I shall be what I shall be A.P. The first Ehich seemeth to be a proper name because God answereth directly to Moses question who was desirous to know his name the second Ehich is an interpretation of the former and not part of the name because that Ehich is but once repeated in the end of the verse Ehich signifieth properly I shall be but it is usuall with the Hebrewes to put the future for the preter tense Ehich hath sent me that is I am B.G.V. I shall be A.P. rather than he that is hath sent me L.S. for Ehich is the first person of the future of hajah to be Vers. 18. They shall hearken to thy voice I rather than heare thy voice V.L.S.B. or obey thy voice G.A.P. for then the preposition Lamed which signifieth to should be superfluous Vers. 18. The God of the Hebrewes hath met with us I.V.B.G. cum caeter rather than hath called us S. L. for the word is Karah with he to meete or come against not Kara with aleph which signifieth to call Vers. 19. The King of Egypt will not let you goe yea not by strong hand I.V.A. rather than he will not let you goe but by strong hand L.S.B.G. the word is Velo yea not or and not the meaning is that hee will be so obstinate that he will not a great while let you goe though he feele Gods mighty hand Vers. 22. And ye shall spoile Egypt or the Egyptians I.G.S.L. better than robbe the Egyptians B. Naâ—zal in Piel signifieth to take the spoile as 2. Chron. 20.25 They tooke the spoile to themselves 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. How long Moses kept his father in lawes sheepe what he did in the meane time and to what end he was so exercised Vers. 1. WHen Moses kept the sheepe 1. Concerning the time when this vision here following was shewed to Moses it fell out 40. yeeres after he fled out of Egypt Acts 7.30 about the 80. yeere of his age for so old he was when Moses appeared before Pharaoh Exod. 7.7 which was the same yeere Perer. 2. so that Moses kept his father in lawes sheepe the space of 40. yeeres for he was 40. yeeres old when he visited his brethren Acts 7.23 and now he was 80. yeere old wherein appeareth the singular patience of Moses that was brought ab aula ad caulam from the court as it were to the carte and in this state of life continued forty yeeres Simlerus During which time it is supposed that he wrote the Booke of Genesis and the Booke of Iob for the comfort of his afflicted brethren in Egypt But it is very like that hee gave himselfe to contemplation and much profited in the study of wisedome the grounds whereof he had learned in Egypt Perer. ex Philone 3. And thus it pleased God to exercise Moses in a shepheards life for these causes 1. That by this meanes he might fully bee weaned from the pleasures of Egypt and as it were renounce the world Perer. ex Gregor 2. The pastorall life and discipline was a kinde of introduction to prepare him for the governement which afterward hee tooke upon him as it is in the Psalme Thou didst leade thy people like sheepe by the hand of Moses and Aaron 3. that Gods power might appeare in raising Moses from this contemptible kind of life especially in the opinion of the Egyptians that abhorred all keepers of sheepe to that high place calling and authority to the which he was afterward advanced Simler QUEST II. Of the mount Choreb whether the same with Sinai HE came to the mountaine of God Choreb 1. Iosephus thinketh that mount Choreb and Sinai were all one some thinke they were two mountaines joyning together and that Sinai was the higher Cajetane thinketh that Choreb was the top of the mount Sinai but it is more like that Choreb was the name of that hilly trace or circuit so called of the drinesse or barrennesse wherein the mount Sinai was situated which place as Philo thinketh was full of bushes and that at the bottome of that bushie hill this vision was shewed 2. Moses drave his sheepe thither because there was good store of grasse by reason that the hill was unfrequented because of the reverence and holinesse of the place but the place was not had in such reverence before this vision therefore it is most like that he went thither as to a secret place and more fit for contemplation and that to him thus prepared this heavenly vision appeared Simler Or the Lord might by a secret instinct draw Moses thither where hee purposed to manifest himselfe unto him Perer. 3. It is called the mountaine of God not for any religion which was there placed of old as Iosephus or because of the height and excellencie thereof as such things are so called in Scripture as the cedars of God Psalm 104.16 But it is so named by an anticipation because there the Lord did appeare to Moses at this time and afterward shewed himselfe by visible signe at the delivering of the Law Iun. 4. This hill is famous in Scripture for seven memorable things there done as the vision of the fire in the bush the striking of the rock with Moses rod there Moses lift up his hands when Ioshua prevailed against Amalek there the Law was given Moses fasted fourty dayes and fourty nights and comming downe from thence broke the tables of stone there Helias had that admirable vision set forth 1. Kin. 19. Perer. QUEST III. Of the vision in the bush Vers. 2. THen the Angell of the Lord appeared unto him in a flame of fire cut of the mids of the bush 1. This is one of the three most notable visions of the old Testament the two other were the vision of the ladder shewed to Iacob Gen. 28. The other of the ancient of dayes unto Dan. 7. Pereâ— But unto these may be added as not inferiour to the rest the appearing of the Lord in
Paulus Burgensis doth herein finde fault with Lyranus for it is evident by that sentence borrowed from Augustine that he which suffereth his brother to perish when it is in his power to helpe him in effect killeth him and so is a transgressor against the sixth Commandement Thou shalt not kill 2. And as for the workes of mercy they are commanded in those severall precepts where the contrary is forbidden as the same Law which forbiddeth to take away a mans life commandeth us if it be in our power to preserve it and where we are inhibited to take away our neighbours goods wee are likewise willed to relieve him with ours where there is cause and in the same Commandement where it is made unlawfull to take away our neighbours good name it is enjoyned that wee should by all meanes seeke to preserve it QUEST XVII Of the true reading and meaning of these words that they may prolong it THat thy dayes may be prolonged But in the originall it is put in the active that they may prolong as read Iun. Momanus 1. Some referre it unto the parents that they by their prayers and blessings may cause the life of their children to be prolonged Oleaster As in the same sense they are said to receive them into everlasting tabernacles Luk. 16.4 and men are said to save 1. Timoth. 4.16 and Iam. 5.20 sic Iun. 2. Ab. Ezra understandeth it of the precepts and commandements which shall procure long life to those which obey them 3. But the verbe is rather here taken impersonally and in the signification of a verbe neuter That thy dayes may prolong that is may bee lengthened so the Childe And it is an usuall phrase with the Hebrewes to put the active in a passive signification as Iob 4.19 They shall destroy them before the moth that is they shall bee destroyed and Iob 7.3 They have appointed painefull nights unto mee that is were appointed unto me Iun. And this seemeth rather to bee the sense because Saint Paul so taketh it Ephes. 6.3 That it may be will with thee and that thou maist live long in the earth Simler QUEST XVIII In what sense the Apostle calleth this the first Commandement with promise BUt whereas Saint Paul saith that this is the first Commandement with promise Ephes. 6.2 hereupon this doubt ariseth in what sense the Apostle so calleth it seeing there is annexed unto the second Commandement a large promise of shewing mercy unto thousands to them that love God Hereunto divers solutions are made 1. Hierom bringeth in two expositions yet resolving of neither As first how some doe take the whole Decalogue because it was first given unto the Israelites after their comming out of Egypt for one Commandement and so would have this promise not peculiar unto this precept but unto all the rest But this is against the Apostles meaning for he doth annex this promise as peculiar to this duty of honouring our parents and calleth this the first Commandement with promise 2. Others doe thinke that in the second Commandement Non tam promissionem prolatam quà m sententiam in landes Dei esse finitam That it is not so much a pronouncing of a promise as an ending of the sentence in the praises of God but herein the fifth Commandement the promise is divided from the precept and the sentence is broken off and not continued as there But Hieroms reason overthroweth this answer Observa quòd verba sunt sponsiones c. Observe that these are words of covenant shewing mercy unto thousands and they are added as a reason joyned to the Commandements Hieron in 6. ad Ephes. 3. Ambrose understandeth the Apostle thus Hac causa dixit quod est mandatum primum in promissione ut discerneret inter mandata quae ad Deum mandata quae ad homines pertinent Therefore he said Which is the first Commandement with promise that he should discerne betweene the Commandements which appertaine unto God and those which belong unto men Ambros. in 6. ad Ephes. His meaning is that it is the first precept of the second Table with promise 4. But I rather resolve with Simlerus and Vrsinus that this is the first precept that hath any speciall and particular promise the other promise added to the second Commandement is generall to all those that love God and so not restrained only to that precept but is extended generally to the obedience of the whole law QUEST XIX Why the promise of long life is made to obedient children THat thy dayes may belong c. 1. Cajetane giveth this reason why this promise of long life is made to obedient children Tanquam gratis acceptâ— Ã parentibus beneficio vitae As being thankfull for the benefit of life received of their parents for it is fit that they which are thankfull to their benefactors should enjoy the benefit long Calvine also to the same purpose God doth shew his favour in prolonging of this life Vbi erga eos grati sumus quibus â—am acceptam ferre cenvenit When we are thankfull to those of whom we have received it So also Thomas Qui non honorat parentes tanquam ingratus meretur vita privari He that honoureth not his parents deserveth as an ungratefull man to bee deprived of life which he received of his parents 2. Thomas Aquin. also yeeldeth another reason In those precepts it was necessary to adde a promise ex quibus videbatur nulla utilitas sequi vel aliquae utilitas impediri where no profit was either not expected or seemed to be hindred therefore in the second Commandement which forbiddeth idolatry a generall promise is propounded because by the worship of Idols Idolaters looked for great benefits which seemed by this meanes to be cut off and because parents being aged are wearing away ab eis non expectatur utilitas no profit is expected from them and therefore a promise is put to this precept of honouring parents Sic Thom. 1.2 qu. 100. art 7. ad 3. But this reason seemeth somewhat curious 3. Oleaster rendreth this reason Because parents doe prolong the childrens dayes precibuâ— by their blessings and prayers 4. Thomas addeth further this reason is put to ne credatur non deberi praemium c. lest a reward might be thought not to be due for the honouring of parents because it is naturall QUEST XX. What other blessings are promised under long life BY long life here not only the lengthening of dayes is understood but other benefits also 1. Tostatus giveth this reason because without other temporall blessings vita laboriose miserabiliter ducitur mans life seemeth to be but full of labour and misery and so no blessing quaest 20. 2. Pelargus thus distinguisheth these blessings Vt triplex honor ita triplex pramium As a threefold honour is to be yeelded to parents so a threefold reward is promised pro honore obediâ—ntiae vita gloriosa for the honour of obedience a glorious life pro honore
three conditions the first is touched by Hierome Non solum Divinitutem Patris c. posse oculos carnis aspicere sed mentis That not onely the Divinitie of the Father but neither of the Sonne or holy Ghost can the eyes of the bodie see but of the minde c. So also Athanasius as he is cited by Augustine Deum omnino esse invisibilem c. nisi in quantum Spiritu mente nosci potest That God is altogether invisible but as he may be knowne in the Spirit and minde c. These then at this time saw not with their bodily eyes the essence of God but certaine visible signes onely and demonstrations of his presence Secondly we shall have a more full sight of God in the next world than in this as Augustine saith Nemo potest in hac vita videre sicuti est No man can see him in this life as he is Eâ— promittitur sanctis in alia vita To see God in his nature is promised in the next life c. So also Gregorie Quamdiu hic mortaliter vivitur c. As long as we live in this mortall life God cannot be seene in his nature c. Thirdly yet fully the Divine nature shall not be comprehended of the Saints no not in the next life as Augustine to this purpose citeth Ambrose interpreting that place of the Apostle Who onely hath immortaliter c. whom never man saw neither can see c. Si natura ipsim est invisibilitas sicut incorruptibilitas c. If it appertaine to the nature of God to be invisible as well as to be incorruptible that nature shall not be changed in the next world of invisible to become visible because he cannot of incorruptible become corruptible c. And againe upon those words of the same Apostle To the King everlasting immortall invisible c. hee writeth thus Vnde ego non audeo ista distinguere c. Therefore I dare not divide or distinguish these things which the Apostle hath joyned together to say To him that is incorruptible for ever in this world and the next but invisible not in the next world but onely in this Contrarie then to this orthodoxall doctrine of the Fathers agreeable to the Scriptures are these ventrous and bold positions That wee shall in the next life participate with Christs Godhead and be made capable of his Divine substance That there is not any thing of Gods which his Saints shall not see In which assertion Augustine doth directly oppose himselfe to all such Dogmatists and Novelists in these words Non quia Dei plenitudinem quisquam non solum oculis corporis sed vel ipsa mente aliquando comprehendit Not because the fulnesse of God any can comprehend at any time not onely with the eyes of the bodie but with the minde it selfe c. for it is one thing to see another to comprehend the whole in seeing c. Totum comprehenditur videndo quod ita videtur ut nihil ejus lateat videntem c. The whole is comprehended in seeing which it so seene that no part thereof is hid from the seer c. Here Augustine evidently testifieth that God cannot wholly be seene unlesse nothing in the Godhead should be hid unto us which here he manifestly denieth 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. Honour in this life no signe of Gods favour Vers. 1. COme up thou and Aaron Nadab and Abihu c. These two which are bidden to come up with Moses and Aaron afterward were slaine with fire from heaven which sheweth that preferment in this life is not alwayes a signe of Gods favour but that the wicked are often exalted and lifted up that they may have the greater fall as the Lord said he 〈◊〉 appointed Pharaoh to shew his power in him Ferus 2. Observ. We must 〈◊〉 upon the Lord 〈◊〉 patience Vers. 16. THe seventh day the Lord called to Moses God would not at the first call unto Moses but maketh him to wait six daye Ne 〈◊〉 familiaritate superâ—iret Lest he should was proud by too much familiaritie Oleaster Vt discamus patienter ferre c. And that we may learne to beare it patiently if God at the first doe not answer to our desire Lippoman As S. Paul therefore be sought the Lord thrice that the temptation of his flesh whereby he was buffered might depart from him 2 Cor. â—â— 8 3. Observ. Sufficient deputies to be left in the Magistrate or Ministers 〈◊〉 absence Vers. 14. IN that Moses leaveth Aaron and Hur in his place It sheweth that the like 〈◊〉 in Ministers God would blesse to leave able deputies in their place when they have just cause to be absent and the contrarie fault he will severely punish 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 4. Observ. The 〈◊〉 of fasting and prayer CHAP. XXV 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter Moses beginneth to set forth such generall ceremonies as belonged to the Tabernacle then instituted for the publike service of God there are two parts thereof the preparation to vers 10. the description to vers 40. 1. In the preparation these things are expressed in the charge which God giveth to Moses 1. Who shall offer the things required namely the people vers 2. 2. What they shall offer vers 3 4 5 6. 3. To what end vers 8. 4. After what manner vers 9. 2. In the description First the Arke is appointed to be made both the bodie thereof 1. Of what matter vers 10. 2. Of what measure vers 10. 3. With what ornaments it must be overlaid with gold vers 11. 4. What adjuncts and appendants both of rings and barres vers 13 14 15. 5. And of the use thereof vers 16. As also the cover of the Arke 1. The matter vers 18. 2. Measure vers 18. 3. The fashion with Cherubims how to be made vers 19. and how to be placed vers 20. 4. The place of the cover vers 21. 5. The use vers 22. Secondly the Table is described 1. The matter 2. The measure and forme vers 23. 3. The parts thereof the crowne vers 24. The border vers 25. The rings vers 26. 4. The appendants the barres v. 28. 5. The appertenants the dishes cups goblets vers 29. 6. The use to set the Shew-bread upon vers 30. Thirdly the Candlesticke is appointed to bee made 1. The matter and after what manner to bee wrought of gold beaten with the hammer vers 31. 2. The parts six branches three on the one side and three on the other vers 32. 3. The forme and fashion with boules almonds knops and flowers to v. 37. 4. The use thereof vers 37. 5. The appertenances the snuffers and snuffe-dishes vers 37. 6. The quantitie of a talent of gold all this must be made vers 39. 2. The divers readings Vers. 4. Fine linnen G. rather than cotten or bombasine I. or silke caeter shas H. Vers. 5. Badgers skinnes I.V.A.P.C. or skinnes of
made the creatures and last of all man whom he created for his glorie So after that God had appointed the Tabernacle to be made and every thing thereto belonging he in the last place setteth downe the office and ministration of the Priests who served to set forth Gods glory in the Tabernacle as man was created to that end in the world Borrh. 5. And to this end God ordained the ministerie of man in his service to succour and releeve the imbecillitie of the people who were not able themselves to endure the Lords voice Simlerus QUEST II. Why Aaron was chosen to be the high Priest Vers. 1. THy brother Aaron 1. The Lord maketh speciall choice of Aaron Moses brother for the Priesthood Propter principatum frequentia cum Deo colloquia Because of his preeminence and for the often conference they had with God and the great works which were done in Egypt by the hands of Moses and Aaron And therefore because in these respects they were more noble and famous than the rest of the people the Lord doth single out Aaron for this high office Simler 2. And the Tribe of Levi was taken from the rest of the Tribes Ad honorem Mosis Aaron ducum populi c. For the honour of Moses and Aaron the captaines of the people Ferus 3 And Aaron was appointed to be the high and chiefe Priest to be a figure and type of Christ Simlerus The divers glorious vestures made for the Priest doe shadow forth the most heavenly graces of the Spirit wherewith Christ was adorned Ferus And he is therefore called Moses brother Quiâ— enim ampliùs alâ—eri est fraterâ—â— foedere nexus quà m Christuâ— Mosi legi gratia novum Testamentum veteri For who can be neerer allied unto another by a brotherly league than Christ to Moses grace to the law the new Testament to the old Beda QUEST III Wherein the Priesthood of Christ and of Aaron agree and disagree NOw Aaron in some things most fitly resembled Christ and in some things betweene them there is great difference First Aaron herein prefigured Christ both in his peculiar function in entring into the holy place to make attonement for the people So Christ is now entred into the heavens to appeare in the fight of God for us Hebr. 9.23 As also in those functions which were common to Aaron with the rest which were these three dâ—cendo precando offerâ—â—do in teaching praying offering or sacrificing So Christ hath taught and lightned the world with the revelation of his Fathers will and by the preaching of the Gospell Christ also prayeth and maketh intercession for his people Heb. 9.25 And he also offered up himselfe in sacrifice for our redemption Tit. 2.19 Hee gave himselfe for us that hee might redeeme us from all iniquitie But yet there is great difference betweene the Priesthood of Aaron which was the type and figure and the everlasting Priesthood of Christ. 1. In the dignitie of their persons Aaron was a meere man Christ was both God and man 2. In their condition the Priests of the Law were men compassed with many infirmities and subject to sinne but Christ was holy harmelesse undefiled separate from sinners Heb. 9.26 3. In the excellencie of the sacrifice they offered the sacrifices of beasts but Christ offered up his owne bodie as the Apostle saith Heb. 9.12 Neither by the bloud of goats and calves but by his owne bloud entred he once into the holy place 4. In the effect they differ the Priests of the law did not perfectly reconcile but onely shadowed forth by that typicall reconciliation the true remission of sinnes by the bloud of Christ who hath obtained eternall redemption for us and hath redeemed us from the curse of the law Galath 3.13 5. In the continuance the Priesthood of Aaron was not to continue for ever but as the Apostle saith This man because he endureth for ever hath an everlasting Priesthood Heb. 2.24 6. In the manner of confirmation They were made Priests without an oath But this is made with an oath by him that said unto him The Lord hath sworne and will not repent thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedeck Heb. 5.21 Marbach QUEST IV. Why Christ is called a Priest after the order of Melchisedeck and not of Aaron ANd although Aaron were a type and figure of Christ yet he is called a Priest after the order of Melchisedeck and not after Aaron not because there was no resemblance betweene Christ and Aaron but for that Melchisedeck and his Priesthood did in three things more lively set forth Christs Priesthood than did Aarons 1. In the eternitie thereof 2. Office and function 3. And name 1. As Melchisedeck is set forth without father and mother without beginning of his dayes or end of his life not that he was so indeed but they are concealed in storie to make him a more lively type and figure of Christ who was in respect of his Divinitie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without mother in regard of his humanitie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without father 2 As Melchisedek was both a King and a Priest so Christ was a Priest in the expiation of our sinnes by the sacrifice of himselfe upon the crosse and a King both in gathering his Church together by the scepter of his word and governing them by his Spirit as also in that all power over all creatures and over the universall world is committed unto him 3. The name of Melchisedek fitly agreeth unto Christ which signifieth the King of righteousnesse and the place whereof he was King which was Salem that betokeneth peace did also set forth the peaceable Kingdome of Christ both making peace betweene God and us and taking away the wall of partition that was betweene the Jewes and Gentiles making of both one as the Apostle sheweth Ephes. 2.13 Now in Christ Iesuâ— yee which were once a farre off are made neere by the bloud of Christ for he is our peace which hath made of both one Marbach QUEST V. Why these Priestly garments are commanded to be made Vers. 2. HOly garments c. glorious and beautifull 1. These garments were called holy in two respects both because in respect of the end they were consecrated and ordained onely to holy uses and therefore the Priests onely were to put them on and none other beside and they were not at all times to use them but onely when they went into the Tabernacle when they went out they put them off as also in respect of the manner of consecration they were anointed with the holy oyle chap. 30. and so set apart for holy uses Tostat. quaest 2. 2. This apparelling of Aaron with such glorious apparell was commanded both in respect of themselves that they by these ceremonies might bee assured that their calling was of God Ferus 3. And in regard of the people hereby the Lord would have their ministerie the more reverenced and had in
dicuntur datus aptantur ad offerendum Their hands are said to be filled while they are made fit to offer Quamdin profanae sunt vacuae censentur c. As long as they are prophane they are counted emptie because no gift is acceptable to God nisi jure sacerdotii but in the right of the Priesthood QUEST XLIV Of the fashion and use of the linen breeches Vers. 42. THou shalt also make linen breeches c. 1. Iosephus describeth the fashion of them that they were made of twisted silke or rather linen and first the Priest put thorow his legs and so drew them up to cover his secret parts and tied them about his middle 2. They reached downe from the middle or loynes to the knees they could not be so woven together but were first woven and afterward sewed together with the needle Hierom. 3. The word is micnesaim which is derived of 〈◊〉 which signifieth to tie or gather together as Iosephus interpreteth it Constrictorium a gathering garment or trussing up because thereby the secret parts were trussed together or as Rab. Salomon because the two slops or breeches were tied and knit together about the middle 4. These linen breeches though they are last spoken of were first put on as well of the high Priest as of the inferiour Priests Cajetan 5. These are not mentioned afterward where Moses caused Aaron to put on his Priestly apparell chap. 29.5 and Levit. 8.8 the reason is Quod ad genitalia nostra lex non mittit manum sed ipsi secretiora nostra tegere debemus because the law reacheth not unto our secret parts but we of our selves should cover our privie members Hierom. Because modestie it selfe the garment being once prescribed would put them in minde to weare it it is therefore in those places omitted 6. The use of this garment was for comelinesse to hide their secrets lest while they went about their service in the Tabernacle if they should chance to fall they might discover that which was to be hid Hierom. And beside Tostatus giveth this reason that by the trussing up of those members the inordinate motion thereof might thereby be better stayed qu. 21. And Hierom further addeth why these uncomely parts should not be discovered that it should not appeare to the eye Quomodo de foedissimis initiis tanta hominum nascatur pulchritudo How from such homely beginnings such great beautie in men and other things is brought forth QUEST XLV How this precept and charge concerning the linen breeches agreeth with that law Exod. 23.26 BUt it will seeme superfluous that this kinde of garment should be prescribed seeing before Exod. 20.26 it was provided that they should not goe up by steps unto the Altar lest their nakednesse might be discovered 1. To this question it cannot bee answered that the former law was abrogated by this seeing it was made not many dayes before it may be not above nine or ten or at the most fortie for the first precept was given at that instant when the Morall law was proclaimed and other judiciall lawes prescribed chap. 21.22 23. Then Moses came downe and went up againe and stayed in the mount six dayes and the seventh God called him up and there he stayed fortie dayes in wich time he received all these orders concerning the making of the Tabernacle and of the Priests apparell the former law being not yet put in practice it is not like it was repealed for God is not as men who many times make lawes and afterward seeing the inconvenience doe reverse them And further it is evident that both these lawes stood still in force and were put in practice in the old Testament 2. Wherefore the better answer is this that the nakednesse of a man is taken two wayes either for the secret parts themselves or for the parts next adjoyning so then although the privie parts being thus covered could not be seene in the casting abroad of their garments yet the neare parts thereunto as their knees and part of their thighes being left bare might be seene Therefore that there might be a greater care of comelinesse and decencie a double bar is laid and two cautelous provisions made that neither the one part or the other should be discovered To this purpose Tostat. qu. 20. QUEST XLVI Of the mysticall application of the inferiour Priests garments FOr the mysticall application of these foure Priestly garments the linen coat the girdle bonnet and linen breeches 1. Hierom by the coat made of linen which groweth out of the ground understandeth the earth by the girdle the Ocean sea quo terra constringitur by the which the earth is as it were girded about and by the bonnet aloft Gods providence that watcheth over all But this seemeth to be somewhat curious 2. Rupertus applieth them unto Christ the linen breeches hee would have to signifie the holy incarnation of Christ qua praeornata est natura nostra ignobilis by the which our unable and base nature is adorned and the uncomelinesse of our nature even originall sin covered and healed But as the high Priest with his ornaments was a type and figure of Christ so the inferiour Priests with their attire doe better resemble other sorts of Christians 3. Therefore thus may the ornaments of the high Priest be applied unto Christ The long white garment signifieth his innocencie the miter with the crowne his Kingdome and power the girdle his justice as Esai 11.5 Iustice shall be the girdle of his loines Marbach As in our blessed Saviour there are three heavenly functions and offices his Propheticall to teach us what evill is in our selves and what good we receive from God his Priestly to reconcile us to God in delivering us from the evill which we have deserved and from our sins and in communicating unto us righteousnesse and other graces from God his Kingly that our deliverance from evill and our possession of heaven and heavenly things may be confirmed unto us by his Kingly power for ever So these three offices were shadowed forth in Aarons glorious apparell his robe with the bels setteth forth Christs Propheticall office the golden plate wherein was written Holinesse to Iehovah his Priesthood and the miter which was put aloft as a crowne his kingly power Iun. in Analys And herein Aaron also was a lively type of Christ that as three duties were to bee performed by the high Priest to teach the people by puritie of doctrine with integritie of life signified by Vrim and Thummim and to take care of the Church continually which is meant by bearing the names of the tribes graven in precious stones in his breast and by his sacrifices and prayer to be Mediatour for them unto God So all these but shadowed forth in Aaron are truly performed by Christ who is our Prophet most holy and perfect to teach us his Fathers will as our King hee protecteth and keepeth us and taketh care for us and as our Priest hee did once
worthily bee left 4. And will they have us to follow them in manners also The Pope and his Cardinals no marvell give such good example of life that it is pitie that they are not imitated They that know Rome and the generall prophanesse and licentious living there though never so much addicted to the Popish religion I think would be ashamed to follow their conversation 5. This ramme signifieth Christ by whose blood only we are purged our eares hands and all other parts sanctified of whom the Prophet speaketh Isai. 50.4 He will waken mine eare as the learned it is blaspemie therefore to applie it to Peter he sanctifieth not the eare Christ indeed healed the eare which Peter cut off I hope they will not say that Peters bloud doth sanctifie them 6. Oleaster giveth a better sense of this place Nihil aliud hujusmodi sanguinis respersione adumbrari video quam Sacerdotum punitionem c. I see nothing else shadowed forth by this sprinkling of bloud than the punishment of the Priests Si negligentiores in audiendis ejus mandatis c. If they should be negligent in hearing Gods Commandements and in the executing of their ministery c. Let the Pope and popelings therefore looke unto it that they smart not for it one day in neglecting Gods Commandements in respect of their owne traditions 4. Controv. Of the elevation of the host and of the signe of the crosse Sa. Vers. 24. THou shalt shake them to and fro The Latine text readeth Thou shalt sanctifie them elevating or lifting them up Whereupon Sa in his annotations would ground the elevation of the host in the Sacrament and Lyranus and Tostatus observe that the Priest shaking them to and fro and lifting them up and downe in this motion made as it were a signe of the crosse in the aire Contra. 1. Who taught them to borrow their ceremonies from the figures and types of the Law If such rites as shadowed forth Christ be still to be used to what end died Christ The Jewes that thinke Christ not yet to be come have some colour in retaining their legall ceremonies but seeing Christians doe beleeve that Christ the body and substance of the Law is come in him all those shadowes are determined 2. Neither was it yet revealed unto them how Christ should suffer and whereon hee should bee offered therefore it is not like that the moving of those things up and downe and to and fro had any such signification 3. Neither was the crosse of Christ of that fashion that as much should be left above the crossing in the head as under it in the feet so that the upright peece should be crossed in the middest after which similitude this motion of the Priests hands seemed to be up and downe and then sidewayes to and fro 5. Controv. Against the burying of Bishops in their Pontificials Vers. 29. ANd the holy garments which are Aarons shall be his sonnes after him It was not the fashion then among the Hebrewes as it is now among the Romanists for their high Priest to be buried in his priestly robes as now their Bishops are intombed in their pontificials Lippoman one of their owne Writers giveth this note hereupon Lest any should say Aaron shall use the pontificall vestures all his life time and when he dieth ipse eisdem indutus tumulabitur he shall be buried in them c. He seemeth closely to glance at that superstitious use practised among them Simlerus ghesseth well at the cause of this ridiculous usage I cannot tell saith he why they should doe so nisi fortè ut mortui fungantur munere suo quod vivi nunquam fecêre unlesse it be that they might exercise their function when they are dead which they never did being alive 6. Controv. Of the lawfulnesse of Ministers marriage and the legitimation of their children Vers. 29. SHall be his sonnes after him c. Tostatus here thus noteth that because in the old Testament the Priests had wives the sonnes succeeded their fathers as others did in civill principalities but now in the new Testament sacerdotes non habent uxores the Priests have no wives and therefore their sonnes succeed them not because they have no sonnes and if they have sometime sonnes illegitimi sunt they are illegitimate c. Tostat. qu. 16. Contra. 1. If the Priests of the Law had their wives of whom was exacted a greater legall purity in outward observations than now why should the Ministers of the new Testament be restrained in the times of the Gospell which hath given us liberty that were in bondage under the Law 2. Then the sonnes succeeded the fathers in the priesthood both because the tribes were distinguished and their families and kinreds divided that Christs line of Iudah might be continued and then the service of the Tabernacle consisting chiefly in externall observations required no such exactnesse but that the sonne might be fit to succeed his father in the priesthood especially God giving an extraordinary blessing unto that lineal succession but now it is not fit that children should alwayes succeed their fathers because the Gospell requireth a greater sufficiencie and the childe is not alwayes heire of his fathers gifts but where the sonne is endued with sufficient parts to take upon him his fathers charge there is no reason why he should be barred We see in these dayes that divers learned men Ministers and Professors under the Gospell have left behind them their sonnes men of worthy parts as Iosias Simlerus had a sonne of the same name who writ the Dedicatory Epistle to his fathers learned Commentaries upon Exodus David Pareus that learned man hath likewise his sonne Philip Pareus who hath written of Logike Kicherman the Author of his Logike and politike Systemata succeeded his father in Gymnasio patrio in his fathers schoole And divers such beside might be named 3. And doth he thinke indeed that the sonnes of Priests are illegitimate and unfit to succeed their fathers What thinketh he of divers Popes that were Priest sonnes as Bonifacius the first Felix the third Agapetus the first Sylvester Theodorus Hadrianus Benedict the 8. Iohn the 12. all which were the sonnes of Priests and Gratian addeth further Quà m plures etiam alii inveniuntur de sacerdotibus nati and divers beside are found to have beene borne of Priests 4. Indeed they which have sonnes and are not married which is no rare thing in the Popish Clergy doe leave an illegitimate seed behind them but such as are borne in lawfull matrimony are an holy seed of what calling soever their parents be for both marriage among all men is honourable Hebr. 13.4 and so consequently among Ministers and their children are holy 1 Cor. 7.14 They therefore that condemne their marriage and make their children illegitimate and so unholy doe contradict the holy Apostle and in a manner give him the lye See more Synops. Câ—ntur 1. â—â—r 77. 7. Controv. That
the wicked doe not eat the body of Christ. Vers. 33. A Stranger shall not eat thereof Like as none which were not of Aarons family were admitted to the eating of this holy meat so none but those which are of Christs family indeed and doe beleeve in him can be partakers of his body and bloud for whosoever eateth my flesh and drinketh my bloud saith our blessed Saviour hath everlasting life Ioh. 6.54 They therefore are grossely deceived who thinke that the wicked and unbeleevers doe eat the very flesh and drinke the very bloud of Christ in the Eucharist Simler for then it would follow upon our blessed Saviours words that they should have everlasting life also See more Synops. Câ—nt 3. â—rr 27. 8. Controv. Against the reservation of the Sacrament Vers. 34. IF ought of the flesh c. or of the bread remaine unto the morning thou shalt burne it with fire This was commanded lest that which remained of the holy flesh and bread might either bee prophaned or might bee superstitiously abused It therefore may seeme strange that the Romanists which are in other things so superstitiously addicted to the rites and usages of the Law doe not also follow the same herein but rather have taken up a contrary use in reserving the consecrate host hanging of it up in a pix and adoring it for this is a true position sacramenti ratiâ— non duraâ— extra usum that set apart the use and the sacramentall respect ceaseth Simler For as the water used in Baptisme is no more a sacrament extra usum out of the use but is as other common water so neither are the bread and wine in the Eucharist For the more full handling of this point I likewise referre the Reader to Synops Cent. 3. err 19. 9. Controv. Against the continuall sacrifice of the Masse Vers. 38. THis is that which thou shalt present upon the Altar c. two lambes c. day by day continually To this daily and continuall sacrifice the Romanists resemble and compare their continuall sacrifice of the Masse and they hold them as Antichrists that doe abolish it as Antiochus abolished the daily sacrifice Ex Simlero 1. There is no externall sacrifice now remaining under the Gospell daily to be iterated for Christ was once offered to take away the sinnes of many Heb. 9.28 he is not then to be often sacrificed 2. Antiochus was the forerunner of Antichrist because he abolished the daily sacrifice before the time which was to continue untill the Messiah came but Christ himselfe by the one oblation of himselfe once offered was at his comming to abolish the daily sacrifice as it is prophesied Dan. 9.27 He shall cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease not only for that he tooke away from the incredulous Jewes their City Temple and sacrifice but because he was the body and substance of those sacrifices which are not now to be iterated and repeated seeing as the Apostle saith With one offering he hath consecrated for ever them that are sanctified Heb. 10.14 which sacrifice of Christ is often to be celebrated by way of thankfull commemoration not to be iterated by any externall oblation 10. Controv. That doe this in the institution of the Eucharist signifieth not to sacrifice this Vers. 39. THou shalt present or make ready one lambe in the morning The word in the originall is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ghashah thou shalt make that is sacrifice or offer The Romanists would take advantage by this word because to make here signifieth to sacrifice that it should be so taken when Christ said in the institution of the Sacrament hoc facite doe this as if he should say sacrificate sacrifice ye this Gallasius here maketh mention how a certaine Sorbonist then a Popish Bishop but illius harae porâ—us a swine out of the same stie to use his owne words in a certaine booke written against the Protestants did make this word a chiefe foundation of the Missall sacrifice Contra. 1. But this will affoord them small helpe for this word ghashah to doe is of a generall signification and is applied to divers senses according to the circumstance of the place as Genes 11.4 faciamus nobis nomen let us make that is get us a name Gen. 18.7 fecit vitulum he made the calfe that is killed it or made it ready Likewise 2 Sam. 13.6 Faciat mihi cibum let her make me meat that is prepare it it doth not therefore alwayes signifie to sacrifice And our Saviour when he saith this doe c. hath relation to the former words take eat as S. Paul sheweth 1 Cor. 11.24 2. The sacrifices of the Law were types and figures of Christs sacrifice the shadow of the body they did not prefigure aliud umbratile sacrificium another shadowing sacrifice such as is the imaginary sacrifice of the Masse 3. And there remaineth now no externall ceremoniall sacrifice but only spirituall by us to be offered unto God as S. Peter sheweth Ye are an holy Priesthood to offer up spirituall sacrifices acceptable to God by Iesus Christ 1 Pet. 2.5 Marbach See further of this controversie Synops. Cent. 3. err 31. Vers. 44. I will sanctifie also Aaron c. Cajetane out of this place would prove the Sacrament of Orders in the new Testament calling them Heretikes that deny it thus inferring Si specialis divina actio sanctificans Aaron c. If there were present a divine action sanctifying Aaron to execute his office much more in the time of grace specialis divina actio concurrit ad sanctificandum aliquos c. a speciall divine action concurreth to sanctifie some ut sacerdotio fungantur to execute the Priesthood 11. Controv. That there is no Sacrament of Orders COntra 1. Cajetanes argument is not good that where there is a grace conferred by an outward signe there necessarily should bee a Sacrament for presently upon Davids anointing by Samuel the Spirit of the Lord came upon him 1 Sam. 16.13 yet I thinke he will not make it a Sacrament to be anointed King 2. It is likewise false that alwayes the inward grace concurreth with the outward signe for this were to tye Gods grace and Spirit to the element Nadab and Abihu were consecrated as well as the rest of Aarons sonnes but they were not sanctified the very next day after their consecration ended which was the eighth day they were destroyed for abusing their office in offering strange fire Levit. 10.1 3. Neither is there now any externall Priesthood in the new Testament to be exercised in the Church but the Priesthood of the new Testament resteth in the person of Christ Thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedek Hebr. 7.21 See further Syn. Câ—ntur 3. â—ror 107. Controv. 12. Against Pythagoras concerning the lawfulnesse of the legall sacrifices NOw in the last place in that the Lord himselfe gave direction unto his people concerning divers kindes of sacrifices of beasts the opinion of