exceedingly prone therefore saith I am thy God as I have made my self formerly known unto thee and thou shalt have no other as not worship stocks and stones so not form and conceive otherwise of me in thy heart and minde And verily as the heavenly light of this true knowledge of God which did appear in the word and work of atonement by Jesus Christ began to be eclipsed and darkened in the Church so idolatry and superstition crept in and prevailed till at last it became palpably gross by Images Pictures using of Saints for Advocates and the like And the bright and glorious arising and shining forth of the Sun of Righteousness who hath health under his wings Mal. 4.4 will prove the alone effectual means to disperse dispel demolish and abolish all that trash and superstitions vanities and to instruct and guide mens souls aright into the knowledge of the true God M. B. The practical use is to pray and labour for such a free and heavenly heart that the Law of God may not be a terrour to you Answ You have taken a course for that aforehand for how can the Law be a terrour while you teach that it cannot curse nor condemn but thus a mans heart may flatter him with a false peace in the way of legal conformity having not attained to the righteousness of Faith or of Christ Again that Spirit which maketh the heart so free and heavenly that the precepts of the Law are sweetness and delight cometh not by the Ministery of the Law but of the Gospel this is not the Spirit of bondage to fear but of Adoption Grace and love Therefore let us pray and labour that the Gospell may have a free passage and be glorified LECT VI. Rom. 2.14 15. For when the Gentiles which knew not the Law c. M. B. Pa. 58. OBservation There is law of nature writen in mens hearts How can the Antinomian think that the moral law in respect of the mandatory power of it ceaseth Ans Your Antinomian thinketh as you also know that the moral law is perpetual and inviolable in respect of the mandatory and damnatory power also within its own territories and dominion there is nothing taken from it thus you mistake him forget your self and abuse your reader and hearers M. B. Page 59. This is good to take notice of against a fundamental error of the Antinomians about the Law in general for they conceive it impossible but that the damning act of the Law must be where the commanding act of a Law is Answ If this errour be fundamental I muse you bring no stronger Artillery to batter and quite raze it 2. Your adversary speaketh of the power and you dispute of the Act there may be power where it is not alway acting 3. I say still The law hath power from the Author of it indifferently to command and to condemne If the Law of our Land should never condemne or punish actually for murder because no man-slayer is to be found yet it hath power to do it nvertheless when occasion shall serve M. B. There are only two things go to the essence of a law c. 1. Direction 2. Obligation Answ These are but your words without warrant or weight which can never carry it your part is to refell the contrary 2. If there be such a law which can onely direct and oblige to it the Apostles Argument may seem to be invalid Gal. 3.10 saying They that are of the works of the Law are cursed c. for a man may be of the works of the Law as it is of power to oblige to direct and oblige only say you and yet be exempt and free from the curse I much marvel that you or any can suppose a law obliging to it for obedience and yet not obliging or binding to answer for disobedience Whatever the Law saith it saith to them that are under the law that every mouth may be stopped and all the world become guilty before God Rom. 3.19 Herein say you lyeth the essence of sin that it breaketh the Law which supposeth the obligatory force of it Answ Sin is a swerving from the rule of direction 1 John 3.4 But can there be sin and not guilt or can you suppose a man to be formally a sinner and yet out of condemnation by the law by preventing that consequence as you call it Lastly a man is properly odious and hateful to God in that he is a sinner and not as he is guilty and subject to the curse which be the effects of justice occasioned only by sin M. B. God by reason of the dominion he had over man might have commanded obedience and yet never a promise of eternal life Answ To what purpose do you here tell us what God might have done where the question is of what God hath done what a law he hath made and put man under which as it commandeth obedience so it condemneth disobedience Rom. 2.8 9. Who God will render unto every one according to his deeds to them who by patient continuance in well-doing seek for glory and honor and immortality eternal life But to them who are contentious and do not obey the truth but obey unrighteousness indignation and wrath Is not here the express and full minde of God in his law and will you curtaile or conceal any part of it Besides how can it stand with divine justice to constitute a Law without power to punish transgressors when he giveth his law in charge he saith That he setteth before them life and death blessing and cursing Deut. 30.19 You may long tell any sober understanding man that he may safely put his hand into the fire it cannot burn him for there may be a fire without power to burn before you can perswade him unto it And yet God hath sufficient power to do this also M. B. As for the other consequent act of the law to curse and punish that is but an accidental act and not necessary to a law for it cometh in upon supposition of a transgression and therefore as we may say of a Magistrate He was a just and compleat Magistrate for his time though he put forth no punitive justice if there be no malefactors offending so is it about a law Answ The Apostle in Gal. 3.19 doth strongly and convincingly conclude against you viz. that the moral law came in with power not only to direct but to reveal wrath curse and condemne for saith he It was added because of transgression that is to accuse and convince of it and to condemne for it that so it might be subservient to the promise in preparing the heart for Christ the blessed Seed This is plaine to be Gods intent in giving and bringing in his law at the first by Moses except you can since then let us see how it is altered or where and when the law was onely given to direct and oblige the other authority and power being denied it or rather taken away
by him then you canonize him for Orthodox M. B. But they never used such expressions in the Antinomian sense as if hereby we were made not only perfectly righteous but also holy and without sin Answ When the Authors have the same expressions and use the same words yet if you may be the Glossary your sinister mind can make their sense to vary and differ 2. They who say we are persectly righteous do affirme us to be holy also and without sin in the same sense and manner but not inherently for if the law require holiness and righteousness how can we be justified in Christ from what the Law hath against us and yet not be as well holy as righteous in him and so without sin what can be spoken by the Spirit of God more plainly then this Christ hath loved us and washed us from our sins in his blood Rev. 15. See also Col. 1.22 And read Luther on Psal 130. vers 3. who there saith They that put not their trust herein alone that by the death of Christ their sins are taken away and Gods eyes closed that he cannot see their sins must needs perish for this onely do the Scriptures set forth that our life resteth wholly and alonely in the remission of sins and in that the Lord will not see our sins but in mercy cover them c. In the reading of which words the said Author of the Honey-comb was much convinced and sore terrified and troubled as he confessed But your carnal reason can put a lower and strange sense upon all such places and so present them in your own shape that nothing may offend any beyond a carnal sense no truth can be admitted what God speaketh plainly will be received no further then wit conceiveth and letteth us see how it may be true and then we will say we belive it but that is not to give credit unto God in what in his word he propoundeth but to assent unto reason as it comprehendeth LECT XV. Exod. 20.1 And God spake c. M. B. HAppily the Law will be more extolled in its digninity then ever by those opinions which would overthrow it Answ It is impossible for any to extoll the Law above the dignity due and proper to it but what you attempt for that purpose doth neither gaine glory to the Law nor commendation to your self 2. You tell us of opinions overthrowing it yet can let your reader see none more subverting and injurious then your own Indeed you bear the world in hand that the adversaries which you have made or feigned to your self do speak against the use of the Law and preaching of it cry down the Law utterly abolish it c. all which with more such-like interwoven stuff is fasly suggested by you to render them erroneous and odious but you can make no such things appear M. B. page 139. For we may either take the word Law for the whole dispensation of the commandments moral judicial and ceremonial or else more strictly for that part we call the moral law yet with the preface and promises added to it And in both these respects the law was given as a covenant of grace which is to be proved in due time or else most strictly for that which is meer mandative and preceptive without any promise at all Answ It is granted the word Law is capable of the two former significations but that in both those respects it was given as a covenant of grace especially in the later more strict sense for the moral law Is a new-coyned and bold assertion lately come out of the mint having as yet no image or superscription upon it save onely ipse dixit to make it currant If your spirits be grown so wanton and confident by reason of some supposed parts or abilities more eminent in your self that you will not keep tract of the Orthodox but slight and reject all humane authority as falling too short of that height you aime at in your aspiring thoughts yet reason requireth it of you to shew your reader some clear text of Scripture upon which you ground your distinction and positions If the moral law strictly and properly so called was given as a covenant of grace Why is it called a law of works requiring mans righteousness And then Paul argued nothing solidly when he said If it be of works it is no more of grace and if of grace it is no more of works else grace is no more grace To admit the one is to exclude and deny the other so inconsistent they be in this point Rom. 11.6 But you take time to prove it and you have your asking and we wait your leisure In the interim you present us with as uncouth and unwarrantable an assertion viz. that the word Law is taken for that which is meer mandative without any promise at all c. It will prove as difficult as bold an enterprize to undertake the proof and defence of this The Scriptures define the law in these words Do and live and so implyeth the contrary viz. He that doth not shall dye so that the mandative is not without the promise nor threatning When Paul saith They that are of the works of the law are cursed Gal. 3.10 doth he not argue convincingly that the works of the law which we do in obedience to its command cannot be secured and set free from the curse And that the law is ever invested with divine authority to promise and threaten to curse and bless to kill and give life I should be afraid so to limit the Lords Soveraignty and to devest him of so much power in his just and holy law as to make him some petite and under-ruler or commander allowing him in his law onely a jurisdiction to make and impose a law without a full and due reigning power having no more light to clear it then as yet you hold forth unto us And now with this wittily-devised key you can pick out and give us the right sense of all those assertions which the learned have concerning the difference between the Law and the Gospel and putting your sense into their words can make them speak as you please But though you can shew us no text to ascertaine the verity of any thing yet you give us a reason as weak and unsound as is your affirmation viz. M. B. For if you take as for the most part they do all the precepts and threatnings scattered up and down in the Scripture to be properly the law and then all the gracious promises where-ever they are to be the Gospel then it is no marvel if the law have many hard expressions cast upon it Answ This reason seemeth to occasion your forged distinction And 1. You would father this upon the learned but tell us of no Author book nor testimony It would have been to your credit and the justification of your weak and questioned cause to have produced one sentence or sillable sounding that way 2.
what Gospel what then doeth it But who will regard how promiscuously he preach seeing if he desire and intend either regeneration healing or conversion of the soul or yet as pag. 192. the increase of grace and holiness the Law as Gospel may indifferently be preached by him and blessed by God And though in respect of the use and end intended the law be subservient yet in their way propounded Gods and mans righteousness and of the effects produced by either viz. life and death they are and must be contrary M. B. And this must needs be the opinion of all sound Divines whatsoever may fall from them at other times as appeareth by their common answer to the Papists question If the Law and the commands thereof be impossible to what purpose then doth he command them Then we answer That those commands are not onely informing of a duty but they are practical and operative means appointed by God to work at least in some degree that which is commanded Answ You know they do not plainly and professedly say this is their opinion and therefore without alledging one sentence out of any directly to second this of yours you labour to derive and infer it as busily as you may such poor shifts are you put unto 2. Neither is it the opinion of all for those are as sound whose answer is That the law doth therefore command things now impossible that we may see our great loss by the fall with our present disability that so we may be humbled a viled and confounded in our selves 3. To incline and dispose the soul to look into the Gospel-way in which all cometh as to beggers by faith and prayer Therefore Augustin saith God commandeth things impossible not as you say that in commanding he may give power but that we thereby feeling our owne utter insufficiency may be occasioned to turn precepts into prayers saying Da quod jubes God bids us turn not thereby to enable us but that finding thereby both the necessity of it and also our inability we may cry Turn thou us and we shall be turned Thus we see whose hand worketh the will and deed 2. You also still mince the matter saying At least in some degree you love to play at small games rather then sit out you are uncertain not resolved as yet what to affirm and stick unto this being a fiction of your owne and no Scripture or Author can be produced to confirm or countenance it It was never questioned but what is wrought by the ministry of the word is to be attributed to the Spirit as the principal efficient and other passages of which he still giveth some verbal touch being already cleared I now proceed to his Arguments M. B. I bring these Arguments to prove the Law and preaching of it the means of Conversion 1. That which is attributed to the whole word of God as it is Gods word ought not to be denyed to any part of it Now this is made the propertie of the whole word of God to be the instrument of conversion 2 Tim. 3.16 Answ 1. Your proposition is unsound and will not be granted many things are often attributed to the word in general which canot be affirmed of every part of it Rom. 15.4 Whatsoever things are written were written for our learning that we through patience and comfort of the Scripture might have hope that is saith Piscator through patience arising from the comfort of the Scripture viz. that be written aforetime Now in the second premise page 188. you tell us that however the law may be blest to conversion yet it cannot be the ground of our justification adoption and consolation nor a man cannot have hope nor comfort in whatever he doth but it must be the promise onely of the Gospel See how your self will not have righteousness comfort and hope from every part of the word no from no part of the law but do restrain it to the Gospel onely and yet the greatest part of what was then written was law 2. Your Assumption is denyed also viz. That it is the property of the whole word to be the instrument of conversion And your place 2 Tim. 3.16 will not conclude it For first the Apostle speaketh not there of conversion but of conversation manners and life to the converted Secondly If all Scripture were to reprove correct then none is to comfort but one part is to reprove and another for consolation a third for doctrine c. law is to kill and Gospel to make alive what part is for one effect and purpose hath not formally any partial ability or fitness for another let the eye see the tongue speak and the feet walk as being purposely made and fitted for their proper offices The whole Scripture is as a promptuary or full Treasury out of which may be drawne and taken what is needful for faith and manners but what is for manners will be unaptly used to build up in the faith Also Matth. 13. the word compared to the seed is vers 19. called by Christ himself the word of the kingdom or note of distinction and by it is meant the Gospel as all know Lastly for that place Heb. 4.12 let Piscator satisfie you if the context will not serve you he saith it is Sermo Evangelii the word of the Gospel which is effectual to pierce the heart and convince the minde of the truth of the heavenly doctrine in it so that none can with a quiet conscience derogate from the credit or verity of it And he addeth that usitatissimum est c. It is a very usual thing with Paul by the word of God in general to mean the word of the Gospel M. B. 2. Argument is taken from those places where the law is expresly named to be instrumental in this great work not to name that place Rom. 7.14 where the law is called spiritual in that respect as well as in others because it is that which worketh spiritually in us as Paul was carnal because he wrought carnally Answ Indeed that place might well have been spared in this controversie for you finde nothing in it for your turne It is called spiritual because of the spiritual nature of it in opposition to Pauls which was carnal and because Paul was carnal therefore he wrought carnally but his working carnally did not make him carnal Also the law is called spiritual because of its spiritual discovering and convincing power or efficacy but not because of any spiritual change it wrought upon Paul as the whole context and every circumstance there maketh it plain the law let him see the vitiousness of his nature what repugnancy and contrariety was in him to that purity holiness and perfection held forth in the law and so occasionally by the commandment sin became exceeding sinful vers 13. M. B. The places are clear out of Psalm 119. and Psal 19.7 The Law of God is perfect converting the soul That which the Antinomian objecteth
it M. B. A third and last instance out of Scripture in answering of which all is answered from Gal. 3.2 Received ye the Spirit by the works of the Law or by the hearing of Faith that of the Gospel or doctrine of Faith In the opening of this Text we must take heed of three errors Answ A Caveat against all error is necessary but it is well that you accuse your Antinomian of none of those three And it had been wisdom in you to have taken heed of affectation of singularity for in rejecting all other of the Orthodox you substitute a most doubtful opinion of your owne as may appear by and by M. B. First I may demand whether any under the old Testament were made partakers of Gods Spirit or no. If they were how came they by it there can be no other way found but that God did give his Spirit in all those publick Ordinances unto the believing Israelites so that although they did in some measure obey the Law yet they did it not by the power of the Law but by the power of Grace Answ You might beware of co-incidency with the first error you named of having Faith before the Spirit for ever we come not to Faith by our reason and will yet you grant a giving of the Spirit to believers as if they first believed then received the Spirit but the gifts and operations of the Spirit are divers It s by the Spirit that the soul cometh to union with Christ and after the woman touched the hem of his garment she received a healing vertue but let this pass 2. By your next expression you might seem to be an Antinomian for They obeyed the Law say you but not by the power of the Law but by the power of Grace what difference now but I like not to force the joyning of hands where the parties hearts be not first linked yet the Reader may take it as if you contradicted your self for why are your words so exclusive but if it be not by the power of the Law originally as by the first and principal efficient yet you mean still it is a subordinate and secondary cause or mean of conveyance Egregie sane M.B. Again in the next place which hath alwayes much prevailed with me did not the people of God receive the grace offered in the Sacraments in the Circumcision Paschal Lamb They were partakers of Christ as well as we and yet the Apostle doth as much exclude Circumcision and these Jewish Ordinances from grace as any thing else wherefore that there may be no contradiction in Scripture some other way is to be thought upon about the exposition of these words Answ When a man willingly of himself is going down a steep place every thing will further him If you had not first conceived this silly and weak opinion of your self out of a humour of contradiction and desire to be accounted the vindicator of the Law you needed not to be so puzled and put to such shifts nor to seek out such sandy grounds and tottering Pillars to support what you see cannot be upholden I may so far credit you that this hath prevailed with you as you tell us but I cannot think it alway did so for you have not alway thought of this nor alway been of this private opinion that the Law is the doctrine of regeneration 2. Grant that this prevailed to keep and continue you in that minde yet would I learn if I might be so bold what brought you into it at first sure it came by some immediate inspiration for I see neither clear Scripture nor Author for it 3. As it hath so prevailed with you so I am sensible of no force at all in it whether to incline or carry the judgement unto it at first or to keep the minde the same still Consider better of it It is granted the people of God did receive the grace offered in their Sacraments c. and were partakers of Christ as well that is as truly and as really as we now what is this to your purpose I ingenuously profess I see not wherein it maketh one jot for you or to confirm your tenet what would you infer hence you say the Apostle did as much exclude these ordinances from grace as any things else and as well as much as the Law that must be your meaning Answ Your self have seemed still to exclude the Law from Grace and to make a direct opposition between them 2. As for Circumcision and these Ordinances being in their prime institution types yea signes exhibitive of Christ and if not essential parts yet appendances of their Covenant of Grace which cannot be said of the Law it being a doctrine of another nature and use therefore neither the Apostles nor Prophets in that case and sense did exclude them from Grace but onely as the hypocrites Ceremonia Legis in sua natura consideralae non autem quatenus suo tempore Sacramenta erant gratiae Pisc Gal. 3. and unbelievers did use them as resting in the things done or using them being antiquated and our of date or joyning them with Christ and Faith as necessary observances to salvation c. Now as this assertion will be too bold as unjustifiable That the Apostle doth as much exclude the Jewish Sacraments in their prime pure and right use from Grace as he doth the Law so that Argument is too childish viz. If the believing Jewes were partakers of Christ and did receive grace by these Ordinances so did they receive grace by the Moral Law also If you look again there is neither contradiction in Scripture nor occasion given to seek out such an uncouth and unwarrantable exposition of the words M. B. Some there are that understand by the Spirit c. Answ Here you first present your Reader with Beza's interpretation but that is misliked as not to your purpose Again say you thus it may be explained As by faith is meant the doctrine of faith so by the works of the Law is to be understood the doctrine of the works of the law thus far I approve which the false Apostles taught viz. That Chrict was not enough to justification unless the works of the law were put in as a cause also Answ If you look into Act. 15. and compare vers 1. and 5. it seemeth that they taught Christ for justification for it is said vers 5. they believed and what should they believe in Christ for but for righteousness and yet they required Circumcision and the keeping of the Law of Moses as necessary to salvation vers 1 5. when we are justified we must work to get heaven So many now hold and teach that good works and observing of the Law are not needfull to justification but they are to salvation of which sort you will prove one if I mistake not Contrary to Act. 15.10.11 Now why tempt ye God to lay a yoak on the Disciples necks c. that is as though he
your self or your ipse dixit must suffice you said so much indeed pag. 139. but proved not one syllable there nor here Much more might be added to discover the vanity and errour of your opinions and exceptions against us but this shall be all at this present Mr. B. Those that say the Law is abolished as it is foedus but not as it is regula say true The Law may be considered as it is a Covenant or as it is an absolute Rule requiring conformity unto it Now it may be granted that the Law is abolished in the former notion though not in the later Answ Those that say the Law as it is foedus is also regula and where it doth regulate there it is foedus a Covenant and that the Law is neither abolished as foedus nor regula say most truly and properly according to the Scripture If you look upon the Law and consider it as God propounded it you never find an absolute rule where it is not a Covenant we want your scriptum est Though God deal with his people in a Covenant of meer mercy it followeth not that his justice in his Law is abrogated or any whit diminished beside Christ having once answered and fully satisfied that hath also made a clear way for this manner of Gods dealing but this is onely the object of the faith of the Elect. 2. You are ready to grant what liketh you to any one save the truth to the favourers of it In your last page Law was not abrogated at all in any good sense say you but now it may truely be granted thus you play fast and loose as you please In whom now is inconstancy You promise to shew but take time for it and till then we will wait that the Law given by Moses was a Covenant of Grace If you understand it of the Morall Law it will be denied therefore look well what you affirm Mr. B. Whosoever expecteth life and justification by the Law he sets up the Covenant of works again nor is it any advantage to say These works are the works of grace and wrought by the spirit Answ 1. By the Law you must needs understand the Law of nature or as it was given to Adam for your opinion is that the Law given by Moses was a Covenant of grace by which then till it was antiquated it seemeth the Church might expect life and justification so that when God said by Moses Whosoever doth these things shall live in them herein they were to seek righteousness and life and not by faith I know not how you can evade but leave it to your second thoughts 2. You set up the Covenant of works again when you teach that salvation is due to good works by vertue of Gods promise though not of merit this doth none other but set up mans righteousness and the Law as foedus yet in words you would seem sometime to deny it And remember also your own words viz. It is no advantage to these works or works of grace for still it is by doing 3. And by this now we may learn what you mean when you say the Law instrumentally regenerateth and converteth for it did so in Davids time and in the old Testament that Law by your opinion was not the Law of works but the Covenant of grace But seeing you say withall that that Covenant of grace is now abrogated then it is not now to be used to quicken and convert It was of use and force in Davids time but not now say you therefore the Argument is inconsequent Or may we take you thus Christ hath obtained that the Law given to Adam may be instrumentall for the Spirit but how is it then that you bring no other Scripture but Psal 19. and 119. which you grant to be meant of the Law comprehensively that is as here for the Covenant of grace you see this will not prove the Law of works to be a converting word Thus you are found further from the truth and at great variance with your self here is much need of reconciling and salving Mr. B. The Law is a rule to walk by though not a Covenant be justified by Answ The just both liveth and walketh by faith 2 Cor. 5.7 then not by the Law 2. If the Law by Moses be a Covenant of grace then it was to be justified by If you object you mean the Law largely taken for the whole dispensation of Commandments Morall Judiciall and Ceremoniall I reply you cannot make all these of one nature so not all to make a Covenant of grace 2. To say the denomination is given to the better part I answer as no text warranteth this so the natures of the Laws is not thereby changed If you say of the whole heap in the floore It s as Corn that maketh nor proveth not chaffe to be Wheat Also so the judiciall which was for the government of the Jewish Commonwealth is as much the Covenant of grace as the Morall Law But this is to decline the question and to confound what you should keep distinct Mr. B. The Antinomian distinction of the Law abolished as a Law but still abiding in respect of the matter is a contradiction The Law saith the Antinomian in the matter of it was not denied to be a rule according to which a believer walketh and liveth Answ You much wrong your Adversary and more endanger your self if there be any evill in a false accusation as the ninth command for he saith not the Law is abolished as a Law but that it is inviolable and for ever Neither can nor yet would any man so conclude from his words but you his words are as you say The Law in the matter of it is not denied c. but what ground is here to inferre an abolition And where he saith A believer walketh according to the rule of the Law yet it is not by vertue from the Law regulating him but from another power within renewing and disposing the heart thereunto He is like the honest Traveller who keepeth the high way freely of his own accord and taketh pleasure in so doing And yet the work here is so imperfect and he cometh so far short of what is in that Law that he findeth and acknowledgeth a power therein threatning and condemning for it so that his free justification by grace is his continuall Rocke and refuge and his faith therein the sole preserver of his peace and safety But by your doctrine there should be no more need of justification Christ or faith after conversion for the Law hath onely a Mandative power say you but none to condemn or curse I muse that your own experience doth not convince you of your errour Thus we reach and say The Law or more properly and plainly that there may be no evasion God in his Law obligeth and bindeth unto that rule of perfect righteousness and also to the curse inevitably for every failing and disobedience You tell of a
not unto themselves but unto us they did Minister the things that are now reported unto you 1 Pet. 1.12 Mr. B. There are two notorious falshoods 1. That God indeed saw sin in believers in the old Testament but not in these of the new Answ To see sin is as an Act of Gods justice in the legall Ministration under which they were in the old Testament but now as is cleared we are not under that Ministration as sometime you yeeld so that it may follow that God might see sin in those and not in these You conceive and think of God without reference to his word and would have sin the object of his eternall and incomprehensible sight in a carnall sense and imagination Can you believe that God remembreth the sinnes of his people no more as his Covenant is Heb. 8.12 And why not then be perswaded of this Mr. B. Was not that place God seeth not iniquity in Jacob spoken of the Church in the old Testament and besides If the Godly were in Christ then doth it necessarily follow by his principles That God must see no sin in them Answ The Authour took that place as I remember to be a Prophesie of a future state 2. Though they were in Christ yet not being adulti but in their time of minority under that legall government God might see and impute sin temporally unto them so there appeareth no absurdity or contradiction but that you love to have your own words Mr. B. The second difference he maketh is that God seeing did therefore punish and afflict for it but he doth not so now So Moses was stricken with death c. Now who seeth not how weak and absurd these Arguments are for doth not the Apostle 1 Cor. 11. speaking of those under the new Testament say That some were sick some did sleep were not Ananias and Sapphira struck dead immediately Answ Your words indeed are that his Arguments are weak and absurd but you make no such thing to appear As for that of 1 Cor. 11. his Answer to it still may suffice for you shew not any invalidity of it nor regard his distinctions there given Besides It will not be granted that those Corinthians nor yet Ananias and Sapphira were believers And so your reason falleth short of the point in question Mr. B. The Arguments of the Antinomians for the greater part do not onely overthrow the use of it to believers but to unbelievers also Answ Their Arguments if rightly conceived of and used do not overthrow the use of the Law to either but then you must keep it within its own proper limits and use it lawfully I grant if you understand those words The Law is a Schoolmaster to Christ historically onely for some make a mysticall and spirituall sence of them also then the meaning is that the same believing Jew who before was under the Law yet since Christ is freed from that servitude and so his state is changed that Pedagogy is no longer yea and believer or unbeliever in the daies of the Gospel we are not to meddle with that administration by Moses but onely to give care to the Gospel which is preached to all for the obedience of faith Rom. 1.2 5. but then it will necessarily follow that he that believeth is actually freed from the yoke of the Law if from the whole occonomy then from every part And he liveth by his faith onely under meer free grace Rom. 6.14 Mr. B. We will grant that to a believer the Law is as it were abrogated in these particulars 1. In respect of justification 2. Condemnation 3. Rigid obedience 4. It s no terrour nor are the godly slavishly compelled to obey 5. It doth not work nor increase sin as in the wicked 6. It is abrogated in many accessaries and circumstances Answ You say you had rather use the word Mitigation then Abrogation as being proper c. And I mislike both as they are used in reference to the Law for both Scripture and experience shew that neither word is incident nor can possibly befall the Law of God for it is inviolable If the Fire burn you not not Sea drown you it s not because they have lost that naturall power to do it but in that you happily are kept out of either such as abide under the Law find no true abrogation or mitigation And if the Law justifie not it 's not because the power of it to do it is lost or lessened for then it could not promise life to the observers saying Do. and live but in that it doth not justifie and give life actually to any that weakness is not in the Law but in man through the flesh Rom. 8.3 for the Law neither can nor ever yet had power to justifie a sinner nor one that failed the least in the observance of it And the like may be said in respect of condemnation The Law curseth and threatneth upon Sinai but cometh not on Mount Sion In Christ we are freed from the Law and so from its Condemnation so the change is in the state of a Christian but no alteration in the Law at all Your own expression cleareth it While the Law by reason of sinne doth pursue me I runne to Christ for refuge and seek to be found in him this I implyeth that the Law hath not lost any of its threatning or cursing power and that my security is not that the Law wanteth power to condemn but that I am in Christ and under his protection Phil. 3.9 As for your third respect of mitigating the rigid obedience as you call it yet I see you are forced to yeeld what D. Tailer and others did not that it cannot be maintained If we fail in the least tittle we are presently gone by the Law And as Christ hath not obtained at Gods hand that the Law should not oblige and tye us to a perfect obedience so you might as truly say he hath not procured that the Law should not justifie us being sinners for this it could not do before But I am glad to have such words from you that all our obedience is accepted not because of any mitigation in Gods justice or for dignity in the duty but onely in and through Christ 1 Pet. 2.5 the best piece of Divinity I find in your Book but then there is no mitigation of rigid obedience in the Law To the fourth To speak properly the Law is therefore no terrour because a believer is not under it for it is a terrour to all that be under it the Christian being under grace is free from terrour And if he be sometime or something afraid that is not because there is not fulness of security in his condition but through the imperfection of faith as children we fear where and when we have no true cause neither doth it argue any less terrour in the Law And you have some strange add unsound expressions in this Section for grant a regenerate and ungenerate part
yet the man is but one and his state but one not two and put the Law with its terrour and compelling power to the flesh what availeth this Can this draw the flesh to the waies of piety as your words are you imagine either that the flesh being and remaining flesh can move in the waies of piety or that the terrour of the Law can change the corrupt heart but can clear or justifie neither It is simple and free believing that leadeth and carrieth the soul into the right way and all the forcing and terrifying of the Law can provoke onely unto an externall and hypocriticall obedience such as is in the Children of the Bondwoman If the spirit in the godly be not alway so willing the Law cannot give aide and quickening to it but rather dampeth and deadeth the spirit of faith and love and doth vivifie the corruption in nature for so saith Paul when the Commandment came sin revived and I died Rom. 7.9 and againe the strength of sin is the Law 1 Cor. 15.56 It 's onely faith in the Gospel of Christ that exciteth to all goodness cheerfully and joyfully so Heb. 11. Noah Abraham Moses are said to do all by faith Sine qua multa faciendo nihil facimus impleudo Legem non implemus What caused life at first must preserve and quicken it being dead or dull 5. And your fifth Assertion is false for the Law doth as is said and proved increase sin even in the faithfull this being the bitter effect of it through the vitiousness of our nature Rom. 7.5 The motions of sin which were by the Law do work in our members to bring forth fruit to death and all along the chapter Paul saith It wrought no otherwise in him in his regenerate estate but that all the power to resist weaken and overcome sin and the flesh was from Christ the head and his spirit Therefore thankes be to God through our Lord Jesus Christ This take notice of that if infidelity be accidentally nourished and faith hindered and opposed by the Law as is most true then sin cannot decrease but doth increase by it Besides is not flesh and corruption in the regenerate of the same kinde with that in the unregenerate If the Law then be the occasion of the reviving of sin in the one why not in the other the nature of the flesh nor the operative vertue of the Law is not altered by grace though they both be overmastered and subdued In the sixth you slander your Antinomian again for disparaging the Law in that it was written in stones What good can it do say you Answ It doth good many waies else God would not have writ it there but that cannot make man good God therefore hath promised to write his Law in the Tables of the heart by his spirit whereby the Gospel also is made effectuall as he pleaseth but this inward writing of the Law is a promise and branch of the new Covenant Jer. 31.33 Mr. B. But the Law continueth to them as a rule which may appear first from the different phrases used concerning the ceremonial law nowhere applied to the moral as which Chemuitius doth reckon up 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. which are not used of the Morall but when he speaketh of it he saith We are dead unto it We are redeemed from the curse of it which Phrases do imply the change to be wade in us and not in the Law Answ Your supposition is still false for we hold no abrogation mitigation or mutation in the Law as is already cleared 2. This maketh wholly for us for if there be no change in the Law then it continueth in all other offices and regards as well as to be a rule and so hath power to promise and to condemn also Hunc suo jugulo gladio 3. You reason nihil ad Rhombum viz. If the Antinomian could bring such places that would prove it were as unlawfull to love the Lord because the morall Law commands it as we could prove it unlawfull to circumcise c. Answ The rule of comparison requireth that it should be unlawfull to circumcise because the ceremoniall Law commands it And if that Law were of force still and not repealed it were as lawfull to circumcise so that the unlawfulness to do it is not from the nature of the thing but in that the ceremoniall requiring circumcision is abrogated but so is not the moral for then to love were not required But though the morall Law command love yet your heart wanting it it giveth it no power to do it Thus you have gained here nothing to your purpose but lost both labour and credit Mr. B. 2. From the sanctification and holiness that it requireth of the believer which is nothing but conformity to the Law Answ Though the Law require yet it proveth not it to be a rule regulating disposing and framing the soul to holiness for the Law doth not sanctifie but Christ is of God made to be sanctification whereby cometh true conformity to the Law The Law requireth to be just but doth not justifie so it willeth us to be Saints but sanctifieth not There is a mutuall relation between Christ and faith as a quality or vertue faith purifieth not but as it fetcheth and deriveth vertue from Christ Purity is not in us naturally the Law requiring it doth convince us both of the want of it and of the necessity to have it but it supplieth us not with it for then Christ need not be our root of holiness nor we by faith to have it from him but driveth us to Christ in whom all fulness dwelleth You have your Answer to the rest of the Section in what precedeth Mr. B. 3. In that Disobedience to it is still a sin to a believer Answ As Disobedience is a sin against the Law so it is condemned by the Law as was Davids adultery Peters deniall c. else what need they of faith to be justified from them so still by this the Law hath power to condemn as well as to rule As for the evasion you mention I know it not you have not as yet brought us into any such strait or danger as that we need seek evasion The residue of this Lecture maketh nothing for your purpose nor at all against us LECT XXIII Rom. 3.31 Do we then make void the Law yea we establish it HEre you do not invalidate the Authors assertion nor Arguments If the Law and Prophets lasted but till John And as John was greater then any before him so the least in the kingdom of Heaven is greater then he You will then find it hard to put John either under the old or new Testament or to evince your Adversary Inter Legem Evangelium interpositus fuit Johannes qui medium obtinuit munus utrique affine Calv. It 's true the Law or Moses and the Prophets write of Christ and agreed in that and did not onely typifie him
to affirm and maintain it and with a smal touch he there passeth it over And here he saith The Law it self converts not No more doth the Gospel it self as he often saith without the spirit This is as if with Mr. Burgess he meanes that either Law of Gospel is the Spirits instrument for conversion and that we may preach either for that end Mr. Rutherford is unwilling to speak out Loquere ut videam 3. If the Spirit by the Gospel conform us to the rule of the Law It s then true that the Law is a passive rule but not active as actuating to effectuate this thus you grant what I asserted and oppose without cause But at last you tell us the Apostle never speaks of our freedom from the Law as it doth regulate direct and lead us Reply Now this overthroweth what you said even now viz. That the Spirit by the Gospel doth direct and lead us in the way of the Law for then the Law doth not actively lead us Mr. T. pag. 9. What freeth a believer from the curse but because he is a new Creature Mr. Rutherf That new creation is sanctification 2 Cor. 5.17 not justification If any be in Christ that is if he be justified he is a new creature that is sanctified or else by the Antinomian gloss the meaning must be If a man be justified in Christ he is justified in Christ Paul speaks not so non-sense Reply This new creature is the man changed in himself and his state Sanctification is not a new creation but a new qualifying of a man It begets him not nor recreates him not to God nor yet delivereth him from under the curse makes him not the child of God restoreth him not into favour nor doth make him Heir Co-heir with Christ c. See your errour 2. To be justified and to be in Christ is not all one as your gloss is they differ as the cause and the effect or as the antecedent and consequent To be in Christ imports union which is before justification Or it is insition that work of the Father Joh. 15.1 that being ingrafted into him he may partake of his righteousness and holiness both imputatively and inherently if I may use the Aristotelian word More sound or probable is their judgement who teach that regeneration includeth both justification and sanctification Mr. Rutherf How shall it follow that Christ hath loosed us from all debt of active obedience because he hath loosed us from a necessity of perfect active obedience but the Law is spiritualized and lustred with the Gospel Law and free-grace and drawn down to a Covenant of free-grace requires not nor exacts upon perfect obedience under pain of losing salvation It requires obedience as the poor man is able to give it by the grace of God that the man may enter in the possession of eternal life Reply I Reply You can shew no text nor reason why Christ looseth not from imperfect as well as perfect obedience and that from active as well as passive Nay if from prefect much more may we argue from imperfect 2. If our state and case be well considered we are spiritually so poor that we are as unable to pay pence as pounds It is all one to a dead man whether life be tendered unto him upon condition of moving his least finger or the removing of a great Mountain and this is our case Again you can produce no Law 1 That requires not perfect obedience 2 That calls not for obedience as a proper condition of life Do and live 3 That threatens not death upon the least failing in any Iota But you let all see your new divinity 1 I must obey but not perfectly 2 The Law is spiritualized c. drawn down to a Covenant of free-grace 3 No more is required of the poor man then he can give c. Vltra posse viri non vult Deus ulla requirt Thus grace is abrogated promise made void and faith is of no effect Mr. Rutherf Paul sheweth what Law we are freed from of sinne and death and saith Christ died for this end Rom. 8 4. That the righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us Whence I argue Those that ought to fulfill the righteousness of the Law by walking after the Spirit and mortifying the deeds of the flesh are not freed from the Law as a rule of righteousness Reply The strength of sinne is the Law 1 Cor. 15.56 2 Christ dyed that the righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us imputatively or grant inherently yet if this be the end and fruit of Christs death as you say then the Law is no active cause of it but the power of Christs death effecteth it And though this righteousness be for matter one with the Law yet still the Law is but a rule passively according to which the believer is conformed and regulated it not actively regulating Also active walking in the Law is but the expression and effect of sanctification and not properly sanctification it self Adam made holy lived accordingly from that inward form his holy life made him not holy Neither is our holy life to procure or preserve peace favour life as the Law propoundeth requireth it for these consist in faith alone which findeth and enjoyeth Christ to be such a true fulness and All-sufficiency to the soul that self by him and with him is satisfied and so needs no ends of its own in working and obeying Joh. 6.35 He that cometh to me shall never hunger and he that believeth on me shall never thirst Mr. Rutherf We are freed from the Law being once justified so the Antinomians whatever we do is not against a Law or rule the law gives a dispensation to do those things being justified which the unjustified cannot do but in doing it they sinne because the unjustified are under the law as a rule of justice which we are not under We have an Antidated dispensation to sinne Reply You straine your wit if not conscience to make quidlibet ex quolibet But I say Take justification in the full latitude and extent of it or consider a Christian still as justified and so he is freed from under the Law but if you speak of or consider him in his active righteousness of works so as you bring him under the Law so he sinneth yea and is judged and condemned by the Law and you must raise him and bring him up to his justified state ere he can be free and secure from the curse Justification extends to all sins at all times throughout the whole life But it s false that I give an Antidated dipensation that is your indirect inference If you put the believer under the Law as he sinneth like the unjustified so the Law threatneth and curseth both equally Though you tell us unwarrantably of your bare word that the Law hath power to rule where it hath no power to condemn then we may live securely in sin or the works
grant the Law to be a perpetual and inviolable Rule of Righteousness but that it is a Rule to a Believer quatenus talis he will not grant 2. It is true it hath vim praecepti as well as doctrinae and so it hath vim damnandi a power to curse as he there affirmeth and you neither have nor can refute M. B. What will he say to the Law given to Adam who yet was righteous and innocent and therefore could not be cursing or condemning of him Ans You mean not that the Law had no power to curse and condemn because Adam was innocent for you grant it had that potentially though not actually If then it did not actually curse it was not because the Law wanted that power but in that state of innocency there was no place nor reason actually to curse Henceforth wonder not at the Author for saying the Law hath power to curse which is denyed by Dr Taylor and your self but wonder at your own oversight who while you would oppose and confute your Adversary do grant and affirm all he requireth And yet in your Lect. 6. you deny this power to curse to be any essential part of the Law When Adam had sinned whether did the Law actually condemn or no If yes I demand then whether it were by that authority and power it had before or some new and further power was given it upon the fall Did not the Law say to him yet in innocency What day thou eatest of that tree thou shalt dye Gen. 2. How was it that it threatened death and forbad the eating under such a fearful penalty if it had yet no power to execute and inflict the same You must now yield and cease or fight on with your own shadow M. B. In respect of the Vse of the Law to Believers It hath this Vse 1. To excite and quicken them against all sin and corruption c. because none of the godly are perfectly righteous and there is none but may complain of his dull love and his faint delight in holy things therefore the Law of God by commanding doth quicken him c. Have not Believers Crookedness Hypocrisie Luke-warmness Ans The love of God in Christ revealed and shed abroad in the heart doth quicken but the simple Command of the Moral Law can never effect what you say He that loveth the Lord hateth sin but we love the Lord not by reason of the Law requiring it but because he hath loved us first 1 Ioh. 4.19 and that we be born of God and know God in his Son It 's strange Divinity that the flesh and wickedness of our nature should be cured or weakened by the Law It may discover the malady or disease but not remedy it Put the Law to the old man it will revive and quicken it indeed but not to goodness if we may believe either Scripture or our own experience The strength of sin is the Law 1 Cor. 15.56 And Rom. 7.9 When the Commandment came sin revived and I dyed Such is the poysonful enmity in us by the first Adam that it maketh head against the plaister of the Law being applyed unto it The old man or flesh is enmity to God and all goodness Rom. 8.7 and the more it is stirred and quickened by the Law the more it is enraged But contrarily the Head of the Body that is the Church is Christ from whom it hath nourishment ministred and so increaseth with the encrease of God and by this means the body of sin is weakened and abolished Colos 2.19 Our Sanctification is not begun nor perfected by legal precepts and pressings but by our true and effectual union with Christ Ioh. 15.4 As the branch cannot bear fruit of it self except it abide in the Vine no more can ye except ye abide in me Verse 5. He that abideth in me and I in him the same bringeth forth much fruit for without me ye can do nothing M. B. In the third Use of the Law pag. 9. How absurd then are they that say the preaching of the Law is to make men trust in themselves and to adhere to their own righteousness Ans It may be truly said that too many so preach the Law that they establish mans righteousness for this is in the mouth of divers The Minister saith Do well and have well and we are taught That the way to come to glory in Heaven is to glorifie God on Earth by good works Christ saveth none but holy ones c. If the Law were used to discover sin not to cover it to weaken and destroy not to strengthen and build up to binde and cast out not to loose release and admit if the Vail were taken off Moses face and the glory of God in his fiery and terrible Law did break forth so that all found it to be a Ministration of death and condemnation this would be a mean to kill and overthrow all self-confidence and boasting But who doth make that use of it Not one of twenty and your self cannot receive the Law and digest it under such a terrifying and damning notion M. B. pag. 11. The Antinomian before he speaks any thing against or about the Law must shew in what sence the Apostle useth it Ans Your Antinomian is as good a friend to the Law as your self neither do you nor yet can you make it appear that he speaks one word against the Law You are too bold in saying that the Apostle argueth against the Law in any sence but if you so charge him your Conscience may give way to slander us M. B. 5 Caution pag. 13. To distinguish between a Believer and his personal acts Believers sins are condemned they are guilty of Gods wrath though not their persons Ans This your nice and groundless distinction was Dr Taylors shift as it is yours You might have seen the vanity of it in the Assertion of Grace or at least have considered how to satisfie the Objections against it before you present the world with it afresh 1. The Scripture maketh the guilt and curse to redound upon the person as Gal. 3.10 Cursed is every man that continueth not in all things which are written in the Book of the Law to do them 2. In your dayly repentance or confession you make in your prayers do you not judg and condemn your self for your sins whereof Conscience doth accuse you What a strange expression is it that sins are guilty of Gods wrath 3. If no guilt redound upon the person there is no more need of Christs blood to cleanse acquit and justifie and to be a continual propitiation for sin The Promise is vain and Faith of no effect unless you will say that you believe dayly to secure not your person but your sins from wrath 4. And the true reason why the sin guilt and curse redound upon any person is because he is put and placed under the Law which revealeth wrath and why all is kept off the Believer it
is not because the Law hath lost its power to accuse and condema as you would bear us in hand but because he is not under the Law but under Grace Rom. 6.14 Gal. 4.4 Christ hath satisfied for him taking all his sins guilt and curse unto and upon himself and God hath justified and set him free so he liveth in peace and at rest by Faith in Christ who loved him and gave himself to redeem him Also the grace and benefit of his Justification doth in some sort redound upon the actions of a Believer For was it not by his Faith that Abels sacrifice pleased God Heb. 11.4 There is no such purity perfection or dignity in the best thing you can do which of it self simply considered can procure or finde acceptance with God The Scripture and all Orthodox Divinity do hold forth Christ only as the ground and reason of all acceptation of man his works and ways 1 Pet. 2.5 Ye are an holy Priesthood to offer up spiritual sacrifice acceptable to God by Jesus Christ You say Dr Crisp is wide and see not your self out of the way of Truth and Charity A man under grace is no more under the Law he is dead to the Law that he may live to God Gal. 2.19 M. B. 6 Caution Law is not to be decryed because we have no power to keep the Law Ans Who cryeth down or speaketh against the Law You cannot shew or name any And who are so much against the Law as your selves who are become vain and needless Advocates for it The blinde Pharisees pretended most zeal for God and his Law who were yet in the state of enmity and by reason of their inward malice and envy against Christ opposition and hatred of the truth of his Doctrine false accusations and seeking to entangle and bring him into danger they lived in the continual breach of the Law Well it is too evident that you with thousand others of your Fraternity cease not to quarrel with except against and to condemn us for Antinomians and yet no demonstrative proof is extant of any such Error or guilt It is easie to lay on load of accusation upon Innocency it self hence such aspersions and indignities cast upon David Paul and that immaculate Lamb Christ himself if the corrupt heart within give way and be bent thereunto How weak is thy heart seeing thou hast done all these things Ezek. 16. The weakest and worst sort have been the most zealous and confident accusers We know say the Jews that this man Christ is a sinner Joh. 9.24 yet they knew no such thing by him What accusation saith Pilate bring you against this man They answered If he were not a Malefactor we would not have delivered him unto thee Ioh. 18.29.30 If so many of that Religion say it it is unquestionably true though there be no reality nor jot of verity in the accusation yet know it that it is an Antinomian part to slander and miscal and to make no crime to appear Thus may the greatest delinquency and guilt of Antinomianism be layd at yours and your fellows doors There is one that accuseth you even Moses in whom you trust Joh. 5.45 M. B. Ibid. It is an expression that an Antinomian * Dr. Crisp useth The Law saith he speaketh to thee if troubled for sin Do this and live Now this is as if a Judg should bid a Malefactor If thou wilt not be hanged take all England and carry it upón your shoulders into the West Indies What comfort were this Now doth not the Gospel when it bids a man believe speak as impossible a thing to a mans power Answ Doth the Doctor in this saying decry the Law Your own words and judgment too do import the like impossibility What a sinister minde is this But all if voyd of prejudice and partiality may clearly see by this his expression that Doctor Crisps main desire design and scope was to instruct erect and comfort a poor distressed and troubled Soul and that therefore he so applyed and ministred Gospel-Cordials Observe the ground and reason of his words if thou be troubled for sin and then you have no cause so to reprove and censure him as you do 2. His counsel and direction differ much from theirs of your way who in such a case bid the dejected man to desire promise and endeavor his utmost to do and walk according to the Law and so put him in hope of mercy in that as it is taught the Law is mitigated Evangelized God accepteth the will for the deed c. The Doctor wisely telleth him of the impossibility of making his peace that way knowing also how apt every one is to take that course that so he may utterly despair of himself self-doings and active righteousness and more readily hearken to the voyce and tydings of the Gospel only And 3. though to believe be as impossible to mans natural power yet it followeth not but that he is rightly put upon the believing the Gospel as Paul did bid the Jaylor Act. 16. to believe in the Lord Jesus that he might be saved The believing way is the only way of life peace and Salvation and the Gospel is to be preached for the obedience of Faith Rom. 1.5 You seek a knot in a rush M. B. 7 Caution I much wonder at one speaking thus The Law doth not only deprive us of comfort but it will let no body else speak a word of comfort because it is a rigid keeper and he consirmeth it by that place Gal. 3.23 But how short this is appeareth 1. Because what the Apostle calleth the Law here he called the Scripture in general before 2. He speaks it generally of all under that form of Moses his Regiment so that the fathers should have no comfort by that means Answ Your Margin might have directed us to the Author or Book if not to the page and place where that had been candid for the circumstances there would have given much light Many sentences of your own if singled separated from what precedeth would speak strangely and make a harsh sound I think that the expression which occasioneth so much admiration in you is either D Crisps or some other reputed Antinomians and his words are Allegorical Though Pauls friends had free access and might minister unto him Acts 24.23 yet many a Martyr in Queen Maries time had not that favor So the Law being a spiritual Jaylor to the Conscience suffereth none in a Legal way to comfort it no work no duty performance or reformation nor man nor Angel The Law came by Moses but Grace Pardon Peace Favor Life Consolation by Jesus Christ 2. That place Gal. 3.23 doth sufficiently confirm it and hath been used for that purpose by such Divines as you have no exception against 3. Your Reasons are invalid For first That Scripture in general is the Law or nothing in the Scripture but the Law which concludeth all under sin Verse 22.
or Ministers forth to call men in that they may see the salvation of their God know all things are made ready fit down and rest securely comfortably and contentedly in the apprehension and injoyment of it Neither touching this matter can you finde more high expressions in Luther as you tearm them then in the New Testament see Matth. 22.4 All things are prepared Luk. 2.30 31. Mine eyes have seen thy salvation which thou hast prepared before the face of all people Eph. 2.8 9. He hath saved us By grace ye are saved not by works lest any man should boast It is you that are too low of Stature who cannot reach to salvation by simple believing and receiving it unless you be heightened and the hands of your faith be lengthened by good works and there is no fault in the highness of the expression I would learn of you how good works can be present when a lost sinner layeth hold on salvation or on Christ that he may be saved or what the presence of them can availe him or what good work was required of the Jaylor or found in him when trembling as truly wretched and undone and crying what he might do to be saved Paul bade him to believe in the Lord Jesus and he should be saved Act. 16.31 but of this more hereafter as occasion will be given M. B. S 3. If this were their ground of many unsavoury assertions among them c. Answ If you were not too dainty nice and quick in mis-apprehension our assertions would not effend you but be as savoury and acceptable as they be to others of as good judgment as your self M. B. That there may be injudiciousness in them as a cause in part of some their erroneous passages will appear in that they frequently speak contradictions Answ If you have greater perfection in judgment and other parts shame not nor disdain them that want neither be arrogant in your self you have nothing but what you received 2. In the undertaking and managing of this quarrel you bewray great weakness of judgment as all may perceive 3. If speaking of contradictions do argue injudiciousness this is more then evident in you I could give instance in many passages which I observed You condemn that assertion It 's no Law if it have no power as to command so to curse and yet with the same breath do say that a Law is alway condemning potentially though not actually If it be condemning potentially alway then it hath alway power do you not see your contradiction If it do not actually it is not because lex non est damnaus but for want of occasion And the like may be seen in your expressions about the Law and salvation by grace and by works c. Mr. B. ibid. This is a passage often but very dangerous That let a man be a wicked man even as high as enmity it self can make a man yet while he is thus wicked and while he is no better his sins are pardoned and he justified Yet in other passages Though a man be never so wicked yet if he come to Christ if he will take Christ his sins are pardoned Now what a contradiction is here To be wicked and while he is wicked and while he is no better and yet to take Christ unless they hold that to take Christ or to come to him be no good thing at all Answ 1. If you wanted not charity towards your Adversary you might have tolerated and accounted of such-like passages as you do of those high expressions in Luther and you pass by great mountains in Dr. Tayler as if no error were in him and are thus strict to finde out a mole-hil or mote in Dr. Crisp and yet can shew none This is out of no love to truth or hatred of error 2. Many things we say are tolerated in Luther for many special reasons and it is clear to me that the same grounds of toleration were in this Author you so except against 3. The injudiciousness seemeth here to be in you who see not to put a difference between a wicked mans disposition and his condition while he is thus wicked and no better to wit in his state and condition If he will come to Christ take Christ that argueth a change in disposition and will a minde to be delivered and freed from that so cursed and dangerous condition he is in 4. To come to Christ to take Christ be good for the wicked man for he hath no way else left for salvation but first he may thank him from whom that motion and perswasion came who gave him that heart and ability to come None can come to me unless the Father draw him Ioh. 6.45 And 2. If this be all the good you so plead for to come to Christ then he is wicked and no better nor otherwise till he come or begin and have a heart to come and so much his words import which might have prevented this wrangling if you pleased 5. Will you teach a man that this act of comming or taking Christ is a good thing in him to be looked at by him or that it is any whit satisfactory to the justice of the Law or available to the recovery of his lost soul and estate that he may put this act in and reckon it towards his discharge or justification or you will teach and tell him that Christ is all this unto whom he therefore cometh forthat purpose If a notorious Malefactor condemned to dye have a pardon put into his hands or have it for going to the King can he plead his going or doth any account him less wicked or guilty for that Also In the same page 30. and Sect. you are offended with the Authors Rhetorical expressions as is also Mr. Geree Ans But what doth not offend a weak and crazie stomach where the minde is prejudicate and sinister nothing can please else where or when may he better use it then in Christs cause or work and it is to as much if not better purpose then a great deal of reading you shew in this Book making little or no use of your alledged Authors but only for a flourish like him that lighteth a candle and presently puffeth it out If he had his weakness so have we The high-Priest of old being compassed himself with infirmity was thereby to be moved to have compassion on the ignorant and them that were out of the way Heb. 5.2 And you impute it ibid to his injudiciousness that your adversary doth minde onely the promissory part of the Scripture and stand little upon the mandatory Answ Be it so I hold it judiciousness and wisdome in him For 1. There be ten for one yea a hundred for one who are wholly for the Mandatory 2 Besides every mans conscience naturally preacheth the Law of works within him Rom. 2.15 but is unprincipled in grace and the free promise 3. If you did consider what little pure Gospel-light is in the general
Answ Here you wrong your adversary he speaks of a power and you of an act The Law may actually condemn where and when it cannot actually justifie as it condemneth every transgressor but can justifie onely the innocent and yet the power for to do both is equally in it as a Law Why do you not answer the ensuing Question viz. Can you put your Conscience under the Mandatory power and yet keep it from under the damnatory The Law bids you love your neighbour though your enemy and presuppose you are obedient thereunto yet do you do it so perfectly that the Law hath no power to reprove and condemn you in that particular If the Law condemn you not away with humiliation Confession Repentance Justification and all living by Faith in Christ For now you can so walk according to the rule of the Law that it cannot subject you to the curse and death you are not reproved and judged in your self for any thing your peace and safety is by your just life the Law being curbed and restrained or rather exauthorized or dis-invested of all power to condemn and your life and comfort is not by your Faith in the Son of God who loved you and gave himself for you as Gal. 2.21 There is no condemnation unto you not because you are in Christ as Rom. 8.1 but the reason is in that the Law though a rule yet wanteth power to reign to death We often meet with this groundless and false assertion and now see what is the chief stone that you stumble at Let this now suffice M. B. The same Author again pag. 5. He dare not trust a believer to walk without his keeper c. they are onely kept within compass by the Law but are no keepers of it Answ The word they relates not to believers if you look the place as here you do intimate You onely repeat what we write but confute nothing M. B. The same Author at another time calls it a slander to say they deny the Law who can reconcile such contradictions Answ I see no contradiction nor shew of any you might tell your Reader wherein it lyeth for all are not so quick-sighted as your self But is not this a contradiction in you who say that we grant the Law to be a rule and that a believer is a free keeper of it and yet that we hold and teach the abolition of it Here the task to reconcile is now yours Also that we deny the Law abideth still a slander for which the Law is against you See the the ninth Commandment The Lord layeth it not unto your charge M. B. p. 52. The second interpretation is of the damnatory and cursing power of the Law the Law is not made to a believer so as he should abide under the cursing and condemning power of it Answ You might remember that right now you said The Law a believer is under hath no power to condemn and curse what need he or how can he then be freed from the cursing power See your own instance If the fire had no power to burn what need was there that God should hinder the act You would saign such a fire as is without all power to burn and tell us of such a Law as wanteth power to condemn who will now fear either or rather who can credit such vain words Your sword cuts the throat of the owner for from the removal or restraint of the act or operation the Argument doth not hold for the removal of the thing or the power to condemn but rather on the contrary it strongly and necessarily inferreth and concludeth that there is such a condemning power in the Law in that it is restrained and hindered from the actual doing of it But secondly here is no such miracle wrought upon the Law as was there upon the fire which kept it from burning the three worthies Dan. 3.23 25. though more abundant mercy be shewed for Christ was made under the Law to redeem us from under it Gal. 4.4 Not to take the curse from the Law but to redeem us In what sense and to what end Christ was under as our surety in the same sense are we freed but he was under both the rule and raign of it Yet it will not follow that believers are in no state of subjection and obedience or being enlarged and set at liberty do not run the way of Gods Commandments For they do it though by another efficient from a new principle and for a different end then that of the Law Do and live They are under Christ and moved and led by his Spirit who is the head and husband of his Church But of this more afterwards M. B. Consider some parallel places of Scripture Gal. 5.23 speaking of the fruits of the Spirit Against such there is no Law the Law was not made to these to condemn them Answ And if you refer it to the fruits of the Spirit the Spirit produceth his fruits of himself and of his own accord no outward Law commanding and directing M. B. And if because the godly have an ingenuous free Spirit to do what is good he need not the Law directing or regulating it would follow as well he need not the whole Scripture Answ You would still bear men in hand that we are against the use of the Law which yet we do stand for if lawfully used as your Text requireth and that in all the Authority and Offices of it and this we can and are ready to make good upon occasion yet since this is so often inculcated by you I wish you would give satisfaction in these few things First If the Spirit make the will and affections free to what is good doth it alter and enlighten the understanding also to know what is truth and good and effectually encline move guide and lead aright without the direction and regulating of the Law doth the Spirit which is light and giveth all light and directive power to the Law need the Law in his work 2. You are to prove and cleer better then yet you have done that the Law is instrumental to the Spirit in the works and ways of sanctification 3. Where do you finde that the moral Law doth give help or power unto any jubet non juvat 4. Whereas you say we are flesh and not all spirit c. It may be replyed that by Scripture and all experience sin the wickedness of our nature is rather irritated and strengthened by the Law then weakned and mortified It is such a desperate disease that it makes head more strongly against any legal plaister and application Rom. 7.5 c. M. B. You say it will follow as well that he needed not the Gospel to call upon him to believe Answ Your reason is much unlike for first the Doctrine of the Gospel is not onely the object of Faith but the outward instrument and ordinary means the Spirit useth both to implant faith and to increase it to
are resolved to venture against the pikes of old tryed and pure truth innocency and a good conscience Well henceforth be better advised like one bemisted you have mistaken your way misrepresented your adversaries and run your credit cause and conscience into a great hazard and you may expect worse in all these without wise and timely retreat The counsel is good if it can be seasonably taken and it cometh from a friend and well-wisher M. B. page 63. This law of nature can never be abrogated And herein we may demand of the Antinomian Whether the law of nature do binde a believer or no whether he be bound to obey the dictates of his natural conscience Answ If a man were not first bound he could not be said properly to be loosed or set free It is granted yet with much limitation and in some things only that every one is bound to obey the dictates of his natural conscience and it is as true to be granted by you also that in case he hearken not at some times or in some things or in case of defect and failing or imperfection this natural law will give out sentence of condemnation for the same as Rom. 2.15 from which it is the peculiar and continual office of faith to set free and secure the conscience So that you do very improperly demand whether the law of nature do binde a believer quatenus so whereas a man believeth that he may be set at liberty in Christ In whom he in his spiritual estate towards God in the things of his peace and life is free as Christ is free with whom by a true and real union he is become one spirit 1 Cor. 6.17 And so is passed from judgement of condemnation and from death to life Fidei nil proponi debet praeter meramgratiam aâ—que haec est ejus objectum Calv. John 5.24 And here faith doth not stand bound to give ear to the voice of either implanted or moral law for the procuring or preservation of peace and comfort but turning from both and not regarding them doth direct and confine ear eye the thoughts and meditations of the soul to that alone simple object Christ and to what he speaketh in the word of grace and salvation whose blood sprinkled and shed for remission of sins cryeth for better things then the blood of Abel This is the proper office obedience and exercise of faith So in God will I praise his word Psal 56. here will I settle my thoughts and fortifie them against the dictates and accusations of a natural conscience sense of sin reason law Satan or whatever assaileth If faith give not an acquiescence and rest to the foul in that free and full atonement by Christ and the goodness and favour of God in him it is in danger to be lost for ever And as you have given me this fair occasion so for the more simple and weak Christians sake who is little versed herein and principled otherwise let me further add That although nature do acknowledge a God and that he is to be worshipped and served Nil magis adversatur fidei quam lex ratio Luth. yet this opinion which is also seconded and much strengthened by the moral law is not without danger and is repugnant to the doctrine and knowledge of faith for nothing is more cross to faith then the law and natural reason the maine battel and dispute in a believer is between the dictates of his natural conscience confirmed by the moral law and the principles of his faith and as the law of faith doth enter and prevaile so it captivateth razeth and expelleth the natural and legal knowledge and thoughts of God and imprinteth a divers from them only suiting to the Gospel or covenant of Grace for now since the death of the Testator the covenant is so ratified and confirmed with God that he remembereth the sins of his people no more but abides fully In illa gratuita reconciliatione per obsignationem spiritus acquiescit It a gloria datur Deo non considerat fides quicquâ—d in nobis vel aliis creaturis ei adversari videatur Olev and for ever pleased with them in his Son and through faith herein the conscience also is made to yeeld to it to receive and imbrace it and so is led and brought into this confidence of the quietness and peace of God towards us and hereby effecteth our assured rest in God reconciled for ever which is the true Christian Sabbath Thus every high thing exalting it self against the knowledge of God according to the Gospel is to be cast down and every thought to be brought into captivity to the obedience of Christ 2 Cor. 10.4 5. And by this is glory given unto God while one thing is felt or suggested within and another is believed Let this be well marked of great and continual use in every Christian that the law implanted by nature is ever contradicting and reclaiming against the testimony of God in the word of his grace whence ariseth the difficulty and impossibility of believing save by the power and operation of God Col. 2.12 therefore in the weighty things of faith to hearken to the natural conscience or moral law will quite overthrow whole Christianity and turn aside the soul to destruction The seeds of morality and remanents of the covenant of works may be found in nature but there is no sparke nor intimation of any pure Gospel In innocency Adam was not principled to finde and receive his righteousness peace and life in another out of himself M. B. Think not that because he Christ dyed to free you from the curse of the law that therefore you are freed from the obedience Answ And do not you think nor teach that Christ came to take away the curse and condemning power from the law contrary to his own express words Mat. 5.17 18. where he saith that every jot of the Law is imperishable and in his opening and applying it afterwards he doth as command so reprove threaten and condemne 2. You will not deny but what Christ hath performed for me as my surety that I am so freed from that it may not be required of me to that end as before 3. Christ doth free us that we by his Spirit may serve freely and cheerfully and without all fear in holiness and righteousness before God all the dayes of our life Luk. 1.76 Therefore are we taken into a New covenant that giveth power and fitness so to serve wherein he promiseth the law in our hearts to put his Spirit into us to give a new heart and a new way c. which the covenant of works could not do Jer. 31. Ezek. 36.27 c. M. B. Vse of instruction against the Antinomians who must needs overthrow the directive and obligative force of the law of nature as well as of Moses Ans This is but the old slander the same false charge so often repeated It is by this
You may seem to disparage the learned too much as if confining or ascribing all the promises to the Gospel or accounting them to be Gospel they should deny any promise to appertaine to the law Whereas I think you cannot alleadge one learned Author who doth not grant the law to have its promises also yea and to make this difference also between legal and Evangelical promises that the Evangelical are free and absolute the legal conditional Promiss alia conditionales aliae gratuita yet never read I of any hard or undue expressions cast upon the law as you insinuate If the curse be not sometime expressely set down yet it is implicite and necessarily included wher-ever the law is mentioned taking it for law moral but you reserve this to a future time and so it is referred M. B. pa. 141. In the moral law is required justifying faith and repentance c. the second commandment requireth the particular worship of God insomuch that all the ceremonial law yea our Sacraments are commanded in the second commandment Answ 1. You may as well say also that the judicial law is included in the first commandment and the second table and so jumble and confound all in one law which in their delivery nature use and end are so distinct 2. Justifying faith is so called only from the object of it unto which it hath respect Non aliunde nos salutem quam ex evangelio consequi quoniam non alibi suam nobis justitiam Deus patefacil quae sola nos ab interitu leberat Calv. but this object is not propounded in the moral law for the soul to have respect unto therefore it is an error to teach that justifying faith properly so called is required in the moral law and a confounding of law and Gospel The righteousness of God is the object of justifying faith therefore it is called the righteousness of faith also Rom. 10.6 and that in opposition to the righteousness of the law v. 5. and it is only revealed in the Gospel whence Paul inferreth it to be the power of God to salvation Rom. 1.16 17. and the Gospel is preached for the obedience of this faith Rom. 1.5 that is to call and bring men unto this justifying faith but if the law do it it is not the proper office and end of the Gospel 3. What requireth repentance must necessarily propound a promise of pardon and acceptance unto the penitent but the moral law knoweth nor offereth no such mercy to any sinner 4. God cannot be rightly worshipped nor known but in Christ the Mediator by whom alone we have access with boldness and confidence Deus nisi in Christo suo coli nec cognosci Eph. 3.12 but the law teacheth not Christ 5. And if our Sacraments be commanded in the second commandment then they were commanded the Jews for whatever the law requireth it is of them that live under it as did the Jews Rom. 3.19 but I hope our Sacraments were not commanded them to use yea and we by that are to be circumcised who now have the second comman dment 2. If all the ceremonial law be commanded there then the ceremonial doth not differ in nature and kind from the moral but as a part from the whole Where is the specifical dissirence then so that you have vainly distinguished the law into moral ceremonial and judicial many other arguments might be used to let you see your great mistake but I forbear in a case so clear M. B. The moral law hath more particulars then can be in the law of nature hence the Apostle saith he had not known lust to be sin had not the law said so c. Ans As the moral law is not so comprehensive as to containe justifying faith and repentance so neither do you evince it to be more extensive or large then the law of nature having more particulars then be in that these be your private crotchets How will it stand with the justice of God to require more then was given to our nature at first And the invalidity of your reason is evident for though the Apostle had not known lust by it yet you know that much of that law lyeth dead and obscure in us there be many seeds and remanents of it which to us be imperceivable till the Ministery of the moral law do fetch those sparks from under the ashes revive and bring them to light And lust lurketh in our corrupt nature as fire is in the slint not known nor taken notice of till the law as the steel beat it out and cause it to sparkle abroad but it followeth not that the moral law containeth more because it revealeth more 2. You take the natural law as it is obliterated and imperfect in our corrupt nature and the moral law in its perfection an unequal comparison 3. The sin of lust was there before the law came now if there were not a law of nature or in nature against which it was how came it to be sin by what law had it a being for the knowledge of it you say was only by the moral law As you pass along you are ever and anon like a rash and passionate Schoolmaster lashing your adversaries without cause accusing them as guilty of crying down the law preaching against it reviling it c. and the like aspersions you cast upon them which argue and bewray too much gall and distemper in you but such passages I pass over being minded not to reply to every extravagant expression but only to give satisfaction in what is material LECT XVI Exod. 20.1 And God spake c. LAstly observe in general that God did not give them his law till he had humbled them Answ The principal end of giving the law is that by it as an instrument God may humble us beating down that pride and presumption in our spirits conceiting and boasting of what we neither have nor are M. B. p. 151. To signifie that the law could not be a way of justification Ans And yet you said but lately that the law requireth justifying faith to what end is it if it show no way to justification nor cannot justifie as you say afterward or how can it then be a covenant of grace M. B. God doth use the law as he doth his whole word to beget and increase the life of grace in us and in this effect of the law to increase life David doth often commend it Ans 1. There be two principal and essential parts of the Covenant of Grace 1. To hold out the way of justification peace and life 2. To promise and give the Spirit of regeneration and renovation So Jer. 31.33 34. and Ezek. 36.25 26. And the law doth neither of these therefore it is no covenant of grace 2. There is nothing more against Scripture and the maine current of all true divinity then to teach that the life of grace is begot by the law Here are two great
mistakes First concerning the nature of the life of grace which is not in works nor the expressions of inherent holiness or sanctification for to move and walk in the law of works or of our own active righteousness is a legal life but that is the life of grace which reviveth quickeneth and comforteth the mortified Vita anima est sentire gratiam Dei mors animae est sentire iram Dei Scult dejected and distressed conscience which lay in extreme wo and in the shadow of death being apprehensive of the sentence of condemnation passed upon him by the law and the spirit of bondage If you know not yet what this life is and wherein it consists ask the condemned prisoner whose life is gone by the law and he will say his pardon would be his life which must come from the meer grace and mercy of his Prince Your great reading may tell you that when divinity was more pure and distinct then it is now repentance was said to have two parts Justificat vitae hoc est unde nascitur vita Pisc 1. Mortification 2. Vivisication and the object of both these is the man who is spiritually slain by the law as Rom. 7. and again quickened through the faith of the operation of God and so made partaker of the first resurrection Revel 20.6 hence it s said Col. 2.13 You hath he quickened together with him forgiving you all your trespasses and the efficient or worker of both these is God who killeth and maketh alive and man is the patient the soul receiving the pardon of sins hath entrance into the presence and favour also of God and in his favour is life and his loving kindness is better then life In his presence is fulness of joy saith the Psalmist Hence we read that justification is to life Rom. 5.18 and Christ is the bread of life whoever eateth of him shall live for ever John 6. and whosoever heareth his voice shall live John 5.25 Thus life cometh by believing but law is not of faith Gal. 3.21 If there had been a law that giveth life surely righteousness which is our justification should have been by the law Gal. 3.21 for righteousness and life come both one way but you confess our righteousness cometh not in that way of the law and so I hope hereafter you will say life cometh another way Here let me commend a sentence or two unto your self and the rest of the brethren yet for your sakes I will not English them Vos falsa imaginatione decipitis miseros homines quasi ex lege vivere debent eóque praetextu in lege ipsos detinetis Evangelio interea facitis invidiam quasi in nihilum justitiam redigat quam ex lege habemus atqui lex ipsa est quae nos sibi mori cogit Rom. 7. pulchre describit Paulus neminem legi vivere nisi cui lex est mortua hoc est otiosa fine effectu nam fimul atque lex in nobis vivere caepit jem nobis infligere lethale vulnus quo perimus c. ergò qui legi vivunt nunquam senserunt vigoram legis ac ne gustarunt quidam quid lex sibi vellet Calv. Paulus est hic haereticus omnium hareticissimus estque haereses ejus inandita quia dicit mortuum legi vivere Dēo Pseudo-apostoli docebant nisi vixens legi mortuus es deo hoc est nisi vixeris secundum legem coram deo es mortuus Panlus plane contrarium dicit Nisi fueris mortuus legi non poteris vivere Deo c. hanc doctrinam ratio sapientia humana non capit ideo perpetuò contrarium dicit scilicet si vis vivere deo oportet te legem servare c. Est que hoc principium una maxima omnium Theologorum vivens secundum legem vivit Deo Luth. Est omnino impossibile aliquem simul legi Deo vivere nunc cessante lege peccato morte adsit justitia Christi salus vita aterna Quicquid est in me gratiae justitiae vitae pacis ac salutis id omne est Christi haecn ipse mihi donat aboles legem damnat peccatum mortem mortificat ut ego vivam habeam in ipso aeternam pacem justitiam consolationem vitam Sed Christum intueor amplector qui crucifixus a me apprehensus mihi dat vitam sic viverit in me Christus Corn. He that hath any Christian experience knoweth that when the soul lyeth in death and darkness the apprehension and presence of Christ who is received and cometh into the heart by faith is the onely true light life peace and consolation of it What that law is David so commended to get life by is to be known hereafter together with your second mistake here viz. that the law is the instrument to beget life and to sanctifie for it is too irksome and vain a thing to speak to these every time you east them in our way M. B. p. 153. This is remarakble that though the former tables were broken yet now God enters into a covenant of grace with them as appeareth by proclaiming him self long-suffering gracious but yet God causeth the commandments to he written again for them implying that these may very well stand with the covenant of grace which opposeth the Antinomian Answ God entred into a covenant of grace with them not now but long before see Gen. 17.4 7. As for me behold my covenant is with thee and thou shalt be a father of many nations vers 7. And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee for an everlasting covenant to be a God unto thee and to thy seed after thee 2. Though God in great wisdom gave the ten commandments to Abrahams posterity for special ends and purposes as now also it is continued in the Church yet it is not joyned to the covenant of grace as if it should perfect or alter it or adde any thing to it It being intire of it self and distinct from the law their natures offices ends and effects so much differing one from the other Read Gal. 3.15 16 17. A place full of light and satisfaction Brethren I speak after the manner of men though it be but a mans covenant yet if it be confirmed no man disannulleth or addeth thereto vers 16. Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made c. vers 17. And this I say that the covenant that was confirmed before of God in Christ the law which was four hundred and thirty yeers after cannot disannul that it should make the promise of none effect And note by the way 1. How the covenant or Testament 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and promise are both one with the Apostle which you stumbled at elswhere 2. That there is not one word of truth in what you say to oppose your adversary but the text is directly against your self 3. Where you say the law may
stand with a covenant of grace your own words imply that it is not then a covenant of grace as you formerly asserted M. B. page 155. How necessary it is to have this law promulged if it were possible as terribly in our congregations as it was on mount Sinai this would make the very Antinomians finde the power of the law and to be afraid to reject it Answ 1. If it were so necessary that the outward promulgation or preaching of the law should be so terrible as your wisdom requireth surely God would have it so for he hath power to do it but the special power and terror is inward and spiritual God by his convincing spirit making the heart shake and tremble in the conscience of sin and a cursed perishing condition of this terrour and consternation your Antinomian may scon have much experience as you yea more for he findeth death in that ministration by the reviving of sin Rom. 7.9 10. and therefore is dead to it as Gal. 2.19 but you say life cometh by the law and so live by doing and working an assured argument that you were never truely slain by the law 2. Would you now have the law become so terrible in your congregations why then did you reprove them that made it like a horrid Gorgon c. you mean surely this terrour only for the Antinomians not for others you thunder against your adversaries but deal gently with friends Also you dash sin out of countenance which is well but do not throw down mans righteousness but establish it rather A little after you say The Antinomian counteth sin nothing because of justification But in what sense doth he so vilifie it I dare affirme that none hateth sin more is so weary of it complaineth so of its remaining and dwelling in the flesh and the sorrow it sometime breeds him c. And yet if he make light of it how can he prize justification from it he that accounteth nothing of sin cannot rightly esteem of a Saviour to save from it therefore contrarily our counting all things loss and dung even our best works legal zeal reformation and worship because mingled and defiled with the leprosie of sin for the excellent knowledge sake of Christ Jesus our desire ever to be found in him not having our own righteousness to know nothing but Christ crucified c. do argue sin to be our greatest and most fearful evil to our apprehensions but it is not so with you and your disciples who seldome or never preach or desire to hear of a Saviour of free justification and do so wrangle with the doctrine of grace and faith And lastly it is confessed that by faith in the blood of Jesus and the grace of justification raigning in the conscience sin Satan and hell be conquered defied and triumphed over Who can lay any thing to their charge Thanks be to God through our Lord Jesus Christ c. he that envyeth this in others is to be pitied because of his poor condition What account do you make of a debt you know is discharged It troubleth you little in reference to danger by suite or law Lastly That phrase of Gods not seeing sin in a believer is still an eye-sore to you and many other And to add this to the former It argueth that you make nothing of sin For 1. If you hated it you would seek to get your soul cleansed from it 2. If you loved God you would not come and appear in his sight untill you were washed from it seeing it is unto him so hateful and abominable that he cannot endure the sight of it and therefore calleth upon his people to wash and make them clean and then to come Or yet 3. If you feared God and stood in true aw of him knowing how terrible he and his presence is where he seeth and marketh iniquity for who may abide it Psal 130.3 or who then can stand you durst not abide in his fight without that faith and assurance that the blood of his Son Jesus hath washed and cleansed you from all your sinnes If as that Martyr said the vaile were taken off Moses face such a glory and dreadful Majesty would break forth as would confound your spirits and be intolerable your sins being set in the light of his countenance then you would not deal with God without faith in the blood of Christ Extrae Christum horrendum est imo de Deo cogitare Calv. nor durst entertaine a thought of him out of Christ in whom iniquity is done away never to be remembred any more Then you cry out Oh blessed man whose iniquities are for given and whose sin is covered and so use your own words say all that ever you preached or writ against this is false you knew not what you said Thus a day of temptation and trouble may come in which you all who have disparaged and despised this may be brought to acknowledge and embrace it as an useful and most acceptable truth of God full of soul-consolation which in your wretched security is now loathed and rejected the law is so mitigated and modified in your opinion and Ministery that Sinai is your Sion you are not afraid to stand there LECT XVII Exod. 20.1 And God spake c. M. B. THe Antinomian pleads for the universal abrogation of the law Answ He is an Antinomian that doth so but you cannot finde the adversaries you deal with guilty of such a crime yet you are no fit advocate to patronize or defend the law for it is abrogated by your self if that be true as it is most certaine that lex non damnans non est lex a law without power to condemn is no law for the law you would establish hath no condemning power as you say therefore the law is by you abrogated How fully satisfactory is Luther to any reasonable man Non quod lex pereat imo manet vivit regnat in impiis sed pius est legi mortuus sicut peccato diabolo Inferno mortuus est quae tamen manent mundus ac impii ea habebunt Ideo cum Sophistae intelligunt legem abrogari tu intellige paulum quemlibet Christianum universae legi abrogari mori tamen legem manere Sophisters do understand and take the law to be abrogated but the truth is the Christian is abrogated and dead to it and yet the law remaineth entire Henceforth correct your self and cease to slander or mistake your poor brethren and without cause so to embitter your words with gall and servour of spirit and the Lord forgive you What further is spoken in this Sermon against the Antinomians is either chargeable upon Islebius or some other not known to me or 2. Is grounded upon a meer mistake of our tenets or is answered elsewhere so that to avoide prolixity I meddle with no more LECT XVIII Mat. 5.21 22. Yee have heard that it was said by them of old time Thou shalt
not kill and Whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgement But I say unto you That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shalt be in danger of the judgement and whosoever shall say to his brother Racha shall be in danger of the counsel but whosoever shall say Thou fool shall be in danger of hell-fire I Wonder at an Antinomian who is so apt to oppose the doing of things in love M. B. p. 173. and doing them by the law together for doth not the law command every duty to be in love Answ Did not Christ taxe and reprove the Pharisees for their alms prayers sacrifices c. which were things commanded in the law because they wanted pureness of love and did them in hypocrisie for praise and self-ends 2. It is the chief point of wisdom in the teacher to discover want of truth of affection and love to things done according to the outward precept of the law 3. Whoso doth a thing simply being moved thereunto by the authority of the law doth it not in love 4. Though the law require love in every duty yet it both findes us in enmity and yet it cannot breed nor work love in the heart though it be often pressed to be done where no such affection is found nor once spoken of thus most are suffered to bless themselves in that kinde of doing M. B. Yea we are to love God by the law because he hath given Christ for us for the law commandeth to love God for whatever benefit he bestoweth upon us Answ If God command love by the law because he hath given Christ then you must presuppose that Christ was given before promise to give him in future it had been more probable for the promise of the Messiah was before the giving of the Law 2. But neither you nor I if we understand what love in truth is can love God because the law requireth it though that be a reason alledged and used for it for it is his love shed abroad into the heart that causeth love in us We love him because he loved us first Natural enmity whatever we profess otherwise cannot be destroyed and abolished but by faith which purifieth the heart and worketh by love M. B. God doth work grace in us by this the law as well as by the Gospel God doth use the law instrumentally for to quicken up grace and increase it in us as Psal 1 19. sheweth Answ Paul rendereth that as the onely reason why righteousness cannot come by the law because it cannot vivifie quicken or give life Gal. 3.21 the quickening spirit is not adjoyned to it The proper office and end of the law is to convince us of sin and death that we may seek righteousness and life in Christ by faith the branch liveth and groweth in the vine and so fructifieth John 15. But this controversie you do professedly and with all your forces of Scripture and Arguments enter upon and largely handle in your 20 Lecture therefore let us pass on unto it for the whole 19 nothing concerneth us LECT XX. Mat. 5.21 22. Ye have heard it hath been said by them of old c. THE Antinomian doth directly derogate from the profitable effect and benefit of the law M. B. Pa. 187. Answ Your accusation and charge will prove too directly peremptory bold and unjust he that acknowledgeth all the effects and benefits of the Law that the Orthodox or God himself in his word do mention cannot derogate any jot from it M.B. This therefore is the assertion which an Antinomian Author maintaineth viz. that the law is not an instrument of true sanctification and that the promise of the Gospel is the seed or doctrine of the new birth and it may not be denied but that many speeches might fall from some men which might seem to comply with that opinion Answ Here is strange insolency and loftiness of spirit All mens eyes must be put out but yours or theirs who see as you see you pretend learning and reading but how is the judgement of the learned slighted and contemned by you you stand up as a zealous advocate pleading for the Law but what illegality and injustice is this with what scorn and lordliness do you insult over your Adversary and would bear and beat down him the truth and his innocency under the foot of pride and disdain Your single opinion must be preferred before all and received by all in your conceit it carrieth in it the light of the Sun here is the Popes spirit all erre but he all is Gospel that comes from him his word is a law onely his Chair is wanting But what mean the Presisident and Fellows of Sion-Colledge to do in the end who so approve and applaud this man and his Book Intend they hereby to bring in and establish a piece of new and strange divinity and to reject and overthrow what is old and true 1. It may not be denyed say you Answ But if it might then perhaps it would be denyed but there is that convincing power in the light of simple truth that will force even the most impudent somewhat to yeeld 2. Yet see what mincing he useth and how loth he is to grant the whole truth and that the world should know that his Adversary hath any of the learned Orthodox truly and really for him or that he himself opposeth any in this but a vilified and despised Antinomian Many speeches might fall saith he from some men as if they were half a sleep or not so considerate as he is when they let such speeches fall or at least intended no such thing or not in our sense as he often saith for it is in him to put what sense or gloss he pleaseth upon their words that so they may not be for us whenas the same truth yea totidem ipsissimis verbis is asserted by both 3. From some men And are they not men of least worth and account too in the Church I dare say you do think no better of them for it They are but some then perhaps you mean few and yet I think you can hardly name one learned and sound Author from whose pen the same assertion hath not fallen 4. Might seem to comply with that opinion Multa videntur quae non sunt What do they seemingly accord with us but in truth and reality are all for you or as you will have them who have learned to make quidlibet ex quolibet yet why do you not produce one for you because you scarce can do it Reader If thou hast the Assertion of grace and wouldst turn to page 166. and 170. thou maist find there Augustine Luther Calvin Bullinger Cornerus Perkins Cudworth Brentius Piscator Fox Tindal and Rollock unto which it is easie to add as many more Orthodox all punctual and full to the point affirming what I say and their words are direct full and exclusive denying this power and work to the
law wherefore I am not the first deviser or broacher thereof nor alone in this opinion as walking in an unbeaten path But unto me it is most strange that M. B. should be so self-confident and bold of spirit as to presume to carry it with violence against all others Let me commend unto thee the words of Perkins because he is worthily approved of and best known unto the simple sort upon Gal. 3.2 Here saith he we see the difference between the Law and the Gospel the law doth not minister the Spirit unto us for it onely sheweth our disease and giveth us no remedy the Gospel ministereth the Spirit And upon Gal. 2.19 Evangelical sorrow is sorrow for sin because it is sin this indeed is the grace of God but it is not wrought by the law but by the preaching of mercy and reconciliation c. the Law then being the cause of no good thing in us And Cudworth on Gal. 6.2 in the last difference between Law and Gospel hath these words The law is no instrumental cause of faith repentance or any saving grace Is this now but seemingly to comply with our opinion when they say the law is no instrumental cause of faith repentance nor of any saving grace nor yet of any good thing in us and still these Authors were no Antinomians but we must be so because our Adversaries like those of Stephen Act. 7. do rule and will have it so I tremble to consider the woful consequences if the Ecclesiastical power should be once in their hands but I trust God will not suffer the wise and honourable Parliament so to intrust them But let us listen what his conceit is M. B. I shall now labour to maintain the positive part that the law preached may be blessed by God instrumentally to work the conversion of men An. The question is not of Gods power whether he may or can do it but whether he hath done it let it appear in all the New Testament that any one was converted but by the Gospel Nay Paul and Priests with others who had been zealous in the way of the law were then onely converted when they received the Gospel and become obedient to the faith Act. 6.7 or did God ever reveal it that his will is to convert by the law God can or may make heavy mountains to ascend as high as the Sun and there abide and the waters in the Sea to burn like straw or other combustible matter but he never did so as yet If you shew it to be his will we shall question it no further M. B. And it is necessary to make this good Answ Because you have undertaken it and are resolved to oppose the apparent and generally received truth to be contrary to all the Orthodox to gratifie Sion Colledge to get a name to your self of being a knowing man seeing more then all other learned Divines or at least to maintain your owne credit now it is necessary for you M. B. For were the contrary true it would be a Ministers duty in great part to lay aside the preaching of the Moral Law as not instrumental and subservient to that maine end of the ministry which is the conversion of souls Answ If I take your words in their true sense they argue 1. I am sorry to speak it that M. B. knoweth not what conversion of the soul is but this may be tryed by and by 2. That he intendeth when he preacheth to convert people by the Law and looketh that the Spirit should make it effectual for that purpose and however he putteth in or subservient to that main end yet he meaneth not onely preparatorily for that he saith he cannot yeeld unto which yet is the clear judgement and constant and sound doctrine of all true Divines but he will be singular But see his ground and how sandie uncertain and weak it is to lay and erect an edifice of so great consequence upon it M. B. I suppose that Jesus Christ hath obtained of God by his death that such efficacy and vertue should go forth in the Ministery that whether it be by Law or Gospel he preacheth the souls of men may be healed and converted thereupon Answ And must your meer supposition satisfie us in a controversie so newly needlesly and yet dangerously started up to the great offence and disturbance of the Church of this nature and high concernment you may suppose Christ hath redeemed all men and Devils A Papist supposeth that Christ by his death hath obtained that his Alms-deeds Penance and good works should have a meritorious vertue and efficacy in them for pardon and salvation and upon that deceitful foundation or supposition the silly deluded wretch buildeth and hazardeth his everlasting salvation Oh that any should be so simple and unwise to content himself with an I supposed it is so 2. You say whether it be by law or Gospel so as if God and Christ are indifferent and it is left to mans choice to use either as he liketh for conversion that is more liberty then is allowed you 3. That the souls may be healed and converted The right order is first to be converted then healed Mat. 13.15 But let this pass yet it is requisite that we agree about the terms for some doubts or differences may arise from the ambiguity of the words yet not as if I would yeeld that regeneration conversion or healing of which I see you make no difference in whatever Scripture-acceptation are wrought instrumentally by the law but to help the weak reader and to clear the truth every way And first Regeneration is the begetting again of the soul to God which God doth freely of his owne accord by the word of truth Jam. 1.18 but because this will not be current that this is meant of the Gospel onely as is objected and as is to be discussed more fully in the next Lecture in that the law is also called the word of truth Let me therefore add two pregnant Texts to put this out of all doubt that it is to be understood of the Gospel exclusively The first is Eph. 1.13 In whom you also after you heard the word of truth the Gospel of your salvation by which Paul telleth how the Ephesians came to their faith and hope in Christ namely by the preaching of the Gospel So saith Calvin He adorneth the Gospel with two Epithets in that he calls it the word of truth and in that it is the instrument of salvation which two adjuncts saith he are diligently to be observed And the Gospel is not onely a certain truth which cannot deceive for so is the Law but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he calls the word of truth as if properly no truth were without it and the vertue and efficacy of it is such that it bringeth salvation unto us as it is also Rom. 1.16 The Gospel is the power of God to salvation c. and therefore Paul was not ashamed nor afraid to
preach it at Rome also If the Law would have served and Paul had known also this your liberty and chose to use either law or Gospel he needed not to shun nor shrinke in the preaching of it for every mans heart is principled to approve and receive that doctrine having the seeds and effect of the law naturally in his bosome but the Gospel is supernatural and the soul is indisposed to receive it of it self yea and strongly by assed and inclined against that way of peace and life revealed by it for it maketh void rejecteth and casteth downe all the excellencies of man his free-will strength righteousness wisdome goodness as being vanity folly weakness sin and vile with God so to prepare and make way in the soul to bring in and commend Gods grace to be all-sufficient and that Christ alone may be exalted and rejoyced in Hence the mystery of the Gospel was to the Gentiles foolishness and to the Iew a stumbling-block 1 Cor. 1.23 Also it is more then evident that this word of the Gospel was the instrument of converting all those Churches to whom Paul writ as his Epistles do testifie as besides these mentioned places to the Romans Corinthians and Ephesians you may also see in Gal. 1.6.8.9 Col. 1.5 Phil. 1.5 who were called into the fellowship of the Gospel But what need the lighting of a Candle at noon-day unless it be still dark Saturday with us The second remarkable place is 1 Pet. 1.23 25. Being born again not of corruptible seed but incorruptible by the word of God which liveth and abideth for ever and vers 25. he expounds himself saying And this is the word which by the Gospel is preached unto you If need were a cloud of expositors might be here produced to evince and confirm it that this instrumental word of regeneration is not the Law but the Gospel It is true some tell us of a twofold regeneration or rather a twofold sense of the word by the one the soul cometh to a second new being and by the other it hath the image of God reinstamped on it And of a regeneration of Faith and another of holiness of nature and life but I would trouble none with these distinctions yet this I add that Melancthon upon Iohn observeth that Christ calleth our justification regeneration and indeed it is a new creation and the putting of the soul into a new and happy condition for thereby it hath reconciliation and peace with God Rom. 5. 2. And there is a twofold healing 1. Of our spiritual estates and thus we are said to be healed by the stripes of Christ Isa 53.5 who is the repairer of this breach and as for that wound of conscience in that day when sin doth bite and sting and the law accuse and terrifie none other plaister can cure it but the blood of Christ who by his eternal spirit offered himself to purge and purifie the conscience Heb. 9.14 and this is done by the application of faith for health or salvation is onely in Christ and in nothing else you can name And as Moses lifted up the Serpent so must the Son of man be lifted up that whosoever believeth in him might not perish but have everlasting life John 3.14 15. 2. There is an inchoate and partial healing of our natures hearts and lives which is effected by the Spirit of Christ renewing and changing all and every member of his mystical body whereof he is the head but as the Moral Law is not the instrument to reveal and hold forth Christ crucified so Faith by which the soul comes to be sensibly healed and having communion with Christ to receive vertue from him this Faith is onely instrumentally by the Gospel which is preached to all for the obedience of Faith Rom. 16.25 26. And if our inheritance come by the law in part or in whole then Faith is made void and the promise made of no effect Rom. 4.14 3. And lastly Conversion may be taken 1. for the change of the condition as when who was in bondage is enlarged set free delivered out of the hands of his enemies and of far off is made near as Iohn 8.36 Ephes 2.13 Col. 1.21 or 2. for the turning of the heart to God Act. 26.18 To turn them from Satan to God If thou wilt return return unto me 3. For the change and alteration in the soul when God sanctifieth a man throughout c. 4. A man may change his religion as did the Jewish-Proselytes and his outward way and manner of life being refined and reformed according to the letter of the law as the Pharisee Luke 18. Now to apply all Hence I infer and say that it is never read in the Scripture that the soul was made spiritually free and estated in grace and favour by the preaching of the Moral Law but the office of it is to arrest convince shut up the soul under sin the curse and condemnation Gal. 3.22 the law and the Gospel are the two keys that Christ gave that by the one sinners might be shut and bound and by the other set free and brought forth Mat. 18.18 2. Neither did the Law instrumentally convert and turn the heart to God for Christ is the way to the Father his blood and cross slayeth the enmity that is between divine justice and the sinner and removeth all lets whatever did hinder or separate and so openeth a free way for access Heb. 10.19 20. and his righteousness is the melius terminus bond or mean of union between God and the soul bringing them into a sure and everlasting covenant of peace he is first King of righteousness and after that King of Salem that is of peace Heb. 7.2 Now Christ his death and resurrection with the fruits and benefits thereof are the subject and peculiar treasures of the Gospel whereof Paul was made a Minister that he might preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ Eph. 3.7 9. further God cannot be com'd unto known nor enjoyed nisi in Christo suo but in Christ And he gaineth and draweth the soul with cords of love he appears gratious and merciful to poor sinners beaten downe humbled and brought to deaths door in the conscience of sin else the soul being afraid of him would with Adam flee away and hide it self from him hence passim men are exhorted to turne to the Lord because he is gratious and merciful Joel 2.13 Psal 86.5 Hos 6.12 We are to hold forth God in Christ reconciling the world unto himself and not imputing their sins unto them and as Ambassadours for Christ we pray men in Christs stead to be reconciled unto to God 2 Cor. 5.18 20. Now this cannot be by the ministery of the Law by which cometh the knowledge of sin for it worketh wrath Rom. 4.15 threatneth with the curse and death Gal. 3.10 And thus the Law doth by the will and appointment of God to force man out of himself to destroy all self-confidence
and trust in any goodness of his owne and to make him to seek out and to hearken after Christ the true and onely right door set open in the Gospel that by him the soul may have entrance being found in him not having its owne righteousness which is of the Law but that which is through faith in Christ The righteousness which is of God by faith Phil. 3.9 It is a vain and a strange conceit that the soul should convert to God by the preaching of the Law sith it can onely turne and come unto him by faith which nothing doth so much cross and hinder as the Law and it putteth the soul upon a contrary way 3. But if by conversion you mean as happily you do the change of the disposition and frame of the soul It is as certain also and clear that God doth not this by the law but by Gospel thus Act. 15.9 God purifieth the heart by faith and Acts 26.18 they sanctified by faith This is the special commendation that Paul giveth of the Gospel that therein we all with open face behold the glory of the Lord as in a glass and are changed into the same image from glory to glory even by the Spirit of the Lord. Againe can mans nature be changed till he be united and ingrafted into Christ the true vine and doth not vertue come by that insition or union And was it ever taught or read that the law should be that ministery by which this is wrought If the law do not set this object Christ before the soul nor is no mean to bring and joyn it to him how can it be an instrument to give and communicate the Spirit of Christ Indeed a legal spirit or power it hath which hath been effectual to work a great deal of reformation and legal strictness having a specious and deceitful shew and lustre as we see in the Pharisees who therefore were admired in their age O Sir if you would set before your own and the eyes of your people duely and daily that exceeding kindness of God and sweetness of his so surpassing love in Christ in so infinite expressions of it and seek to affect both your own and their hearts with it you would finde what an incredible force and vertue is in it far beyond any power in a legal Ministery to melt gaine and leaven the soul transforming it into its own nature and image which is love and mercy and so disposing you to do all things of the law freely and willingly which are but the offices and duties of love And the law was given not to beget this love but that by requiring it of us either love or enmity as it is in us might be bewrayed and made manifest In a word no sounder further nor better conversion can be wrought by the law then was in Paul before he received the Faith who in that his zeal of God was a blood-sucker and butcher of Christians Christs silly and harmless sheep for he was inwardly in the gall of bitterness c. and so are too many this day as we see finde and feel who might be metamorphozed by the Gospel and of wolves become lambs like Priest like People according to their pasture they feed in viz. as the nature of the doctrine is they receive so they are where much law is there hardness of heart cruelty self-love c. but want of meekness humbleness and mercy And it will ever be true that a legal zeal is persecuting 4. If lastly you hold this last sort of conversion to be by the law viz. to make a loose and profane man strict and religious in his course of life which is properly no souls conversion for both he may be in statu quo prius no changling in his state and his nature was principled for this way this may be granted you but alas who seeth not that this is hypocritical feigned unsound Luther saith The law can but make hypocrites if there be no further work but what is by it This I ingenuously profess what ever you may think of it that my desire is not to know or think of God out of Christ but to confine all the powers and workings of my soul unto that so pleasant and amiable object God reconciled in his Son And so to set him before me gracious propitious loving c. in all the events occurences and conditions of this life And this is the true and onely office and exercise of faith And thus I deal with God even as he also dealeth with me according to Luthers expression without the Law in his Covenant of meer grace the more I can do so the greater confidence I have towards him the better every thing he doeth pleaseth me the more welcome is the Cross and the more apt and able I am to bear and digest it the more is my heart and affections lively and sweetly stirred up and enlarged to love God and to delight my self in him by this mean the soul is made merry and kept joyful in the Lord and like an Instrument in good tune it is ready for use upon any occasion And the inward appearing and manifestation of God unto the soul in love and tender mercy doth melt it and effectually change and overcome the enmity and maliciousness of my naughty heart and nature And this light I endeavour to hold out to all and to walk in this way of loving kindness long-suffering and compassion towards every one in doctrine and life holding it the wisest most direct effectual and Gospel-like course and way thus to overcome the frowardness and evil that is in man with lenity and goodness even as God in this way prevented and overcame me The more I can look into that gentleness aimableness and those fatherly affections in God through Christ Jesus towards me and that secreet bosome of divine love is so laid open the more are all fears banished discontentments swallowed up and I am heartned to go on chearfully in a Christian course as best becometh that holy and heavenly calling And the more abundantly Gods thoughts of peace are discovered unto me the more peace and rest I thereby finde bred and preserved in my thoughts You may account it a licentious doctrine or otherwise asperse it with indignities because you have little skill of it and may bridle your self and disciples by another mean and kinde of woful doctrine but when you have done I wish you might feel how your owne pulses do beat But I proceed You deny the Law to work onely preparatorily in conversion And I thinke he never had experience of convesion that is of your mind you would make men believe you sit downe with a legal reformation as is the case of too many instead of a Gospels-conversion or that the law had never as yet its due and perfect work upon you for then you would sing another song When the commandment came sin revived and I dyed Rom. 7. Did ever any come
to life but by death And when a man hath seen and felt nothing but sin and death in himself the law cannot tell him nor let him know of a righteousness and life ordained for him in another out of himself and therefore here it ceaseth to help He that expecteth conversion by the Law may as well seek light in darkness life in death conversion where confusion terrour and desperation is Who can credit your bare word in this that the law which is found both by Scripture and experience to be the word that revealeth and worketh wrath and death should yet be the ministry also of conversion to the soul I cannot do it M. B. Onely two things must be premised Answ Nay not onely two but a third also viz. that what you say is infallibly true without exception your new divinity must pass for current M. B. First that the law could never work to regeneration were it not for the Gospels promise Answ You mean not that the Gospel-promise should be any ingredient to the ministry of the law and so by the vertue and efficacy of this as some special pearl used amongst other things in themselves of little or no force this cure or work should be effected but you say that vertue should go forth equally and indifferently by law or Gospel and this because God hath promised to give a new heart through Christ as the Medium by and in whom he creates and changes it anew for so you would contradict your self but thus you intend that Gods promise to give this heart is grounded on Christ as the reason of making it but the performance may be by the law But is it your part to make this to appear for truth By regeneration we are become children to God but if this be by the law then are we but like Ishmael children of the bond-woman Well your words want weight and credit too I wonder you should think such private fancies would ever be received having no warrant but your pen. What have you no Text nor Author to produce not one sentence or word from either for confirmation M. B. So that while a Minister preaching of any commandment doth thereby mold and new frame the heart Answ You want a probatum est for it M. B. All this cometh by Christ who therefore dyed and ascended into heaven c. Answ Every word of God is pure add thou not to his word lest he prove thee and thou be found a lyer Prov. 30.5 6. Where is it said that Christ dyed and ascended to give such power and vertue unto the law M. B. So that there never was in the Church meer pure Law nor meer pure Gospel Answ It is a heavy accusation and charge never what not in the Prophets Apostles nor yet Christs time but alway a Miscellaneous or mixt doctrine this seemeth too bold and rash If you shuffle all together it was not alway so the promise in Paradise That the seed of the woman shall bruise the head of the Serpent and that to Abraham Gen. 12. That in Christ all the families of the earth shall be blessed was surely pure Gospel without any Law M. B. But they have been subservient to each other in the great work of conversion Answ Subserviency was alway granted and taught but that may be without mixture Christ or the Gospel and the Law cannot be and dwell together and as the dead fly marreth the Ointment in the box so the least thing of the law mingled with the Gospel corrupteth it and wholly destroyeth it saith Luther they are so repugnant and opposite you know the nature and operations of contraries and the doctrine of grace and of works are contrary Rom. 11. If of grace it is no more of works You say you approve of Luther Qui scit inter legem Evang discernere c. sciat se esse theologum but you will not meddle with that now Answ No nor no time else it is needless if they were alway intermingled how can they be otherwise now and if either severally or both joyntly may effect true conversion what need we make a difference or why it is of so great consequence to give an exact difference between them I understand not But in the closure you seem as if you would have eat your own words saying God may make the opening of the moral law instrumentally to concur thereunto you are providing hereby some moor rome aforehand for fear of that strait your former assertion brought you into M. B. The second thing which I premise is this That howsoever the law preached may be blest to conversion yet the matter of it cannot be blest to Justification Adoption or consolation Answ More strange still what conversion is it which is not included in Justification by it the soul is re-united and reconciled to God Totus processus a peccate c. The learned have taught and told us that the whole passage and way from sin wrath and death unto righteousness favour and life is by mean of free justification What is blest to justifie is blest to convert us to God but the Gospel and not the Law you grant is blest to Justification Adoption Consolation When Paul did beseech the Corinthians to be reconciled to God 2 Cor. 5.19 20 or to receive the Atonement was not that to turn to God no God had the heart to eschew evil and do good is not to turne unto God My son give me thy heart and then let thy eyes observe my wayes Christ is the way to God Again is it possible to partake of Adoption whereby we become children by one doctrine and to receive the qualification or divine image or likeness reinstambed on us by another doctrine 3. Is not our Reconciliation or coversion the ground of our hope and consolation The promise of the Gospel giveth no ground of hope or consolation to the unconverted 1 Pet. 1.3 We are begotten again to a lively hope Who can have hope in God or consolation from him but he that is regenerated or converted or is there any ground or reason of either but onely in this that we are called and converted to the faith of the Gospel Blessed be God who hath given us everlasting consolation and good hope through grace 2 Thes 2.16 You put in after Not in any thing he doth as if you made no difference between conversion and mans doing or work which is gross And yet elsewhere you erect much hope and consolation of future good and glory upon mans doing and duty which here you deny see pag. 40. where you say there is a promise made to our works c. M. B. Therefore let us not confound Law and Gospel nor yet make them so contrary in their natures and effects that where one is the other cannot be An. If this your doctrine doth not confound them while you say they were never pure nor distinct in the Church and not telling what is Law
is that the Hebrew word doth signifie largely any doctrine and so may comprehend the whole word of God Answ You say that others as well as they Antinomian take the law so largely so that you see your Adversarie is not single in his opinion as you are who can produce no Author but onely say It seemeth good to expound that phrase in such a manner And otherwise it seemeth it would cross your designe else I see nor you do shew no reason But Luther and some others upon that place Psal 19.7 do take the law for the moral law but I dare say you will not stand to their exposition of it Luther saith This is no absolute commendation of the law but it is to be understood legem talem factans esse per fidem non talia facit lex The law worketh not these it self but they are effected by the influence of the Sun of righteousness inwardly quickning reviving and comforting the soul through the faith of the Gospel The law giveth nor hath no such heat or vertue of it self but produceth contrary effects It may indeed saith he convert the eye mouth hand ears omnes vires sed magis avertit cor odio paenarum indignatione prohibitae concupiscentiae sed cor non est rectum spiritus non est fidelis In brief his judgement is that after the soul is justified and converted by the Gospel then it loveth the law which it hated before and now it doeth not avert or as being afraid she from God in his law but with confidence and delight draweth nigh unto him and observeth the things of the law because the Spirit of Christ in the Gospel maketh them sweeter to the soul then all the riches and pleasures of this life Thus it s the doctrine of reconciliation by Christ believed on that marvelously altereth the Christians heart causing it to convert and turn to God as being thereby able to abide his sight and presence and to love his saw Et Amans legem non potest eam satis landare adeo placet quae prius adeo displicuit You say nothing that hath any strength in it against the truth held out and maintained by us And by this you may see whence it was that David so commended the law strictly taken because his heart was so altered by the faith of the operation of God It is remarkable saith Luther that the way to love and keep the law is to believe and receive the Gospel from this belief issueth love and all true obedience and it is not bred and effected by the law commanding and requiring it By faith we establish the law Rom. 3. ult M. B. That opinion which would make Christ not take an instrumental way for conversion of men in his first Sermon wherein he was very large that must not be asserted but to hold that the preaching of the law is not a Medium to conversion must needs be to say Christ did not take the nearest way c. Answ You answer your self page 169. where your words are That our Saviours intent was only to explicate the law better then did the Scribes and Pharisees that so they might be sensible of sin and discover themselves to be fouler and more abominable then ever they judged themselves unto which let me add And that by requiring and so letting the hearers see a necessity of a more absolute righteousness then was held forth even in the doctrine of the Scribes and Pharisees he might so destroy all confidence in their own works prevent the establishing of mans righteousness and prepare and dispose them to hearken after his righteousness for he is the end of the law for righteousness to al that believe Rom. 10.4 And by this it may appear that he used the law preparatorily to justification and conversion as you in part are forced to grant it to be the opinion and doctrine of all Orthodox Divines and yet it is thwarted by you who love to have a way by your self M. B. If the law of God have that objectively in it that may work exceedingly upon the heart when set home by Gods Spirit then it may be used instrumentally as well as the Gospel but it hath c. Answ Here is nothing but the vain reason of man If God be otherwise pleased what is it how glorious fit and worthy soever it may seem for this in our eyes The Sun in the firmament is a glorious object to look upon when we have eyes but God useth it not therefore to give and restore the use of sight to those that be blind the seeing man findeth variety of delightful objects to look at among the creatures but they finde him not eyes therefore M.B. 5. If the law of God may be blessed after a man is converted to the increase of his grace and holiness why not then to the first beginning of it That it is for the increase of of Godliness appeareth by experience Answ Every Christians experience teacheth him that the more he inwardly seeth and feeleth that divine love that pardoneth reconcileth and preserveth the soul in that everlasting covenant of sure mercies and peace the more it loveth againe and in love hateth evil escheweth it doth good is every way cheerfully obedient I love the Lord saith David because he heard me when I called upon him in the time of trouble and delivered my soul from death my eyes from tears and my feet from falling What bred and caused love and gained the heart to God at the first that same is of continual force still to enlive and enlarge the affections towards him But because sins are forgiven it is said she loved much Luke 7. and if this Candle be put under a bushel if this Sun the light of Gods countenance do not shine forth upon the Solissequium the soul of a believer it will be dark dull and indisposed to whatever good you can propound to it therefore is it requisite that faith be nourished and ever operative and lively in apprehending and feeding upon that exceeding kindness of God in Christ that so it may be more quick and free in all holy expressions Faith works by love if faith dye or wax cold by which the soul liveth the law can but little work upon or affect the heart Besides as the Christians beginning so his building up and increasing is in another way and by other means then are meerly legal he lives and grows in the Vine Christ and thereby fructifieth M. B. It is hard to think that a Minister having opened any moral duty of the law may not pray to God to cloath that word with power to change the heart of the hearers Answ Why should man thinke it hard or be offended at any thing where he findeth it Gods will that it be so and no otherwise 2. If God reveal not his minde and willingness to put forth any renewing power in the law how can you then pray in faith to be
heard 3. True prayer is for the fulfilling of his promise in his own way and not in ours M. B. If the Ceremonial Law the Sacraments and Sacrifices were blessed by Gods Spirit while they were commanded to be used for the strengthening and increase of grace notwithstanding the deadly nature of them now then the Moral may be blessed c. seeing it stands still in force Answ While those ordinances were in use they were effectual to increase faith and so to quicken confirm and cheer the heart against inward temptations from sin Satan the fear of death of judgement c. for they were instituted for that purpose and fitted also in that they held forth and shadowed Christ Crucified the body and substance life and thing signified If you can prove that the moral law was either ordained or so fitted for that end you say something else water is not so weak as is this Argument M. B. Let the use of them be c. Answ The Lord let you see your error and failing and give you a right use of what is said Indeed the law is holy yet it is manifest that maketh neither heart nor life full of holiness though you abound in legal performances M.B. What is regeneration but the working of the moral law in the heart that is the Image of God Answ Regeneration giveth a new being birth and estate as well as a new Image It maketh us both Sons and also like our heavenly Father but the law is the instrument for neither but the word of truth which is the Gospel of salvation Jam. 1.18 as is cleared before You seem to have a zeal but not according to knowledge and so would lead and hasten on your hearers in a wrong way LECT XXI Rom. 3.31 Do we then make void the Law c. M. B. Let us consider a great mistake of the Antinomian Author in the Assertion pag. 171. where he makes the very ground why they are charged with Antinomianisme to be because they do not hold the law to be used by God instrumentally for the conversion of men certainly this is a great mistake for there are many learned men who hold the work of the law to be no more but preparatory Answ Sir It is no mistake at all for both Dr. Tailor and many others upon that ground have so concluded and condemned us And if your words will sufficiently satisfie the world that this our Opinion and Tenet is so Orthodox and free from Antinomianism as you are enforced to do lest otherwise you should unavoidably as you see and say bring many yea all the learned into the same condemnation with us except your self who yet in so doing might put your owne neck into the coller I doubt not then but the truth will also clear and free us in all other out assertions And so in despight of all ill-will our innocency which hath so unjustly suffered and been so unworthily aspersed a long time by you and others will at last come to light and we shall mirabile dictu stand recti in curia Plead thou our cause O God of our righteousness M. B. Yet for all that they do peremptorily maintaine the use and obligation of the law in respect of believers therefore they are not in that respect condemned for that error Answ Surely if I understand any thing neither they nor yet your self will be so peremptory as to maintain the use and obligation of it to believers quatenus tales To faith or in the state or things of faith there is no obligation nor use of the law If the law be useful to the working Abraham as Luthers phrase and distinction is yet here they all and you also must do so at the last unanimously confess that the law hath power actually to condemn him in all his works and wayes so that by his faith he ever retireth in spirit and returneth to Christ his righteousness that so he may enjoy and preserve his peace freedom life and comfort your best performances need remission of sins much more you for these your Lectures Again if the learned be not condemned for this errour in this respect yet you account it an errour in them and cannot prove it so or else how is it so intolerable in us are you become partial and inequal judges M. B. The question is not whether by the power of the law we come to obey the law but whether Grace may not use the precepts or law preached for the inflaming of our affections so in love with the things commanded that we are thereby made more holy And thus I interpret those Authors that deny the law to be instrumental to holiness that is not animated by Gods Spirit or separated from it An. Now you should address your self to encounter and you begin to shrink in diffidence doubtless of your cause which you perceive so unjustifiable that no advocate will be found to patronize it for did not you in pag. 187. say that you suppose Christ Jesus hath obtained by his death that such efficacy and vertue should go forth of the ministery that whether it be law or Gospel the souls might be healed and converted And now you seem to be no longer of that minde that by the power of the law we come to obey the law which as you mean it is all one with conversion If we come not by the power of the law to obey then it is by the power of the Gospel onely and so we agree If you reply You mean by no power inherent in the law I say There is no inherent or physical vertue neither in the Gospel to effect our conversion 2. Now the question must be onely whether Grace may not use the law c. This is the liberty you can allow your self to alter and to state the question as best liketh you If you misliked the form and terms wherein you found it why became you opponent And now your expressions in this be so uncouth and improper as that grace may use the precepts c. and your meaning in the residue so obscure and doubtful and I so unwilling to wrong you the least jot that I had rather forbear then meddle any further I shall deliver my minde how pertinent to your question or satisfactory to your self it shall prove I know not thus This word of God which revealeth the riches of grace and exceeding kindness in giving righteousness and salvation to the soul is the true and proper instrument for the inslaming of the affections in love both to God his law and all the things of God and the law neither maketh to love God nor its owne commands And here you so mince it that your expression onely is to make us more holy as if already you granted now that the law doth not instrumentally initiate or work sanctification at first but increase it afterward consider this well Lastly Those Authors you mean are not beholden unto you for your so gross and
inconsistent interpretation They say the law is not the instrument of sanctification Gods Spirit sanctifieth not by the law the law is the instrument of no good c. It is true you say and thus they mean that is the law not animated by Gods Spirit or separated from it Answ So neither do either they or any think Law or Gospel to be 2. If that be their meaning they might deny the Gospel to be instrumental also 3. But you read their words in the Assertion of grace to be that the Spirit doth not animate nor use the law in sanctification or conversion save onely preparatorily Now you must either grant us that these Authors unto which might be added all others of any special account are guilty of as much Antinomianisme as your adversaries are in this respect or that your quarrell is as weakly managed as it was causlesly undertaken yea and that you with your society have erred in opinion and practise I shut up all with that so pertinent and pregnant saying of Calvin on Gal. 3.19 Si quis excipiat cum lex regula sit pie recte vivendi cur potius transgressionum quam obedientia causa positadicitur Respondeo Vtrumque veram justitiam demonstret tamen in hac naturae corruptione nihil quam augere trangressiones ejus doctrina donec accedat Spiritus regenerationis qui ipsam cordibus inscribat hic autem non datur a lege sed fide percipitur M. B. I come to consider of those places c. I shall not take all because one answer may serve for many they being built upon the same ground Answ You are farre indeed from taking all but onely such by your perverse usage and wresting whereof you may more subtilly and easily elude and seem to evade M. B. First the state of the question is obscurely propounded by him for thus he saith The promise or the Gospell and not the Law is the seed or doctrine of our new-birth Assert pag. 163. Now here are ambiguities as first the promise or Gospell for by this he seemeth to decide a great question that whatsoever is a promise in the Scripture this belongeth to the Gospell but a command or threatning that belongeth to a law whereas this needeth a great discussion Answ You see a mote in your Brothers eye and consider not the beame in your own How changeable have you been in the assertion and question last discussed and handled you are so inconstant and mutable in your termes sence and scope that it is very uncertain and doubtful as yet what you are resolved to stand to But 2. where its said the Promise or Gospel and not the Law c. do you accuse this of ambiguity surely without cause except for your humour or to take occasion to trouble the simple with a dotage which none of mean understanding would ever question As for your so great question as you call it All the promises in the Scripture cannot belong to the Gospel for the law hath its promises Do and thou shalt live in them where life is promised conditionally of this is spoken before and it is of the By. 3. If the word promise were onely used yet being placed antithetically in opposition to the law who can doubt what should be meant by it Paul in Gal. 3.18 thus useth it If the inheritance be of the law it is no more of promise but God gave it to Abraham by promise Argumentum a contrariis Haereditas est promissione nempe nuda ac simplici seu gratuita non igitur ex lege i. c. promissiâ—ne conditionalis Piscat In Gal. 3. How often doth he in that Chapter as in Rom. 4. oppose law and the promise Also to avoid all ambiguity as much as was possible it followeth Or the Gospel by which it is easie to conceive what is meant by him who hath not a minde to cavil and seek a knot in a rush The learned tell us That in the Scriptures use and sense Testamentum foedus promissio pactum Evangelium ferè sunt Synonyma Well by promise then is meant the Gospel so that controversie is decided and there is no place for ambiguity And if you turne to your named pag. 163. the word promise is not at all in the proposition but a wanton spirit may finde himself sport at his pleasure M. B. 2. The State of the question is not about the Gospel or the law as they are both a doctrine but as the Spirit of God working by one or the other the not attending to this maketh the Argument so confounded Answ The proposition is formally this The Gospel and not the Law is the instrument of true sanctification What need these cautions and vain words as if none can speak plain English but you And as by your Predecessour Dr. Tailer so here we must be stiled and taken for confused men but you onely are distinct and seraphical M. B. 3. He saith It 's not the seed of the New-birth whereas conversion or regeneration is made the writing of the law in the heart and Matth. 13. The word of God in general is compared to seed sown Answ And he saith nothing but he may truely affirm it still 2. You put no difference between regeneration conversion and writing the law upon the heart which yet in propriety of phrase sense and use are distinct as is shewed before who now is guilty of confusion 3. And although the work you mean should be the writing of the Law in the heart yet it followeth not to be by the law for how then should the law in sanctification be established by faith Lastly It is not the word in general but with restriction the word of the Kingdome that is the Gospel that is compared to the seed sown see Mat. 13.19 M. B. The first instance is John 17.17 Sanctifie them c. I answer 1. The word Sanctifie when applyed to men doth not signifie onely justification or renovation but setting apart to some peculiar office or charge Answ The words in the Assertion are To Sanctifie in the sense of the Hebrews from whence it is taken is to separate any thing from a prophane and common use and so to consecrate it to God or to convert it to a sacred and divine use So that if you have learned men for your great and full Library may well exceed my poor and diminished Study who so take it that Christ prayed here for the fitting of the Apostles for their great charge yet that is of fishers to make them fishers of men and so to separate them from their former prophane and worldly calling and trade unto a sacred which thing my words do include and import also 2. But then to sanctifie them must be more then to ordain them for that function even to endue them with a great measure of holiness and gifts requisite for so high a calling Yet 3. All that I read do take the word as I say And sith Christ
doth include others also even all that the Father gave him in that prayer I still incline to their judgement 4. You say the word doth not onely signifie c. whereas the word onely is not there but now is foisted in by you 5. And your meer reason why to sanctifie cannot comprehend justification or renovation is because these cannot be applyed to Christ who saith For their sakes I sanctifie my self that they also may be sanctified through thy truth Answ This is much against you as I conceive For 1. did not Christ sanctifie himself viz. his humane nature that he might be the root cause and means of communicating righteousness and holiness both to justifie renew and change them 2. Neither will it follow on the other hand that a word of so extensive a sense may not as it is aplyed to Christ be taken more strictly or in one sense onely and to his Elect more largely as it agreed to their condition M. B. If sanctification do here include justification how by the Antinomian principle can our Saviour pray for the justification of them that were already justified Answ Answer your self how do you aske forgiveness of sins in the Lords Prayer and yet believe they are forgiven in your Creed 2. His prayer is extended also to all that afterward should come to believe through their word and ministery M. B. But in the next place grant sanctification for renovation how doth this prove that the law is not used instrumentally for our Saviours argument is universal They word is truth and may not this be affirmed of the Law as well as of Gospel Answ Our Saviours words be indefinite But why pass you over these words in that very place pag. 164. which be so material so pertinent and satisfactory to this your query viz But if we note well what this word of truth is it will be more evident for this end compare with this that place Eph. 1.13 and Col. 1. where the word of truth is said to be the Gospel of salvation and the Antithesis used in John 1.17 sheweth that it is a special and peculiar prerogative of the Gospel to be called by that name by way of excellency as also Calvin Piscator c. affirm Thus far in the Assertion unto all which you stand not onely mute without a word of reply but here you ask a question which they answered before you formed it and so would have prevented It s granted the Law strictly taken is truth but as it is observed by all the learned the Gospel in many like places is so called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 M. B. The next instance is Tit. 2.11 12. For the grace of God bringeth salvation teaching t is c. Answ All this may be granted and nothing maketh against this opinion for none deny the Gospel to be instrumental Answ But the place doth import it to be peculiar to the Gospel for that word of grace or the grace of God appearing in that word that bringeth salvation teacheth to deny ungodliness c. And I put not in that word effectually ambiguously as you charge me but to avoid and prevent all ambiguity for I grant the Law teacheth these same things materially but not with efficacy and success as doth the Gospel the Spirit being pleased to utter such divine force and vertue in that Ministery unto the Elect. M. B. But is not here a contradiction The Author before made the Gospel and promise all one whereas here it doth command holiness and godliness Is not this with the Papists to make a new Law let him reconcile himself Answ You are better skilled in tying knots then in unloosing any If the Gospel and promise be all one that is not of my making I found them so Gal. 3.18 as is shewed before and see that you both take and leave them so according to the true intent of Scripture 2. You say It commandeth but there is no such word in the text but teaching to deny that is instrumentally The holy Ghost is that spiritual unction that teacheth believers and doth it effectually by the Gospel Unctio docet vos Spiritus S. efficax est per praedicat Evangelii saith Piscator on 1 John 2.27 And this they receive saith he as the members from the head the branches for the vine But this is not wrought by nor effected onely by a literal and outward command The Spirit moveth and teacheth a spirit and cometh from the union with Christ I wish your Tenets did not more interfere with Papists But I forbear Now you may see how your thoughts need reconciling not my opinions the light by this hath happily done it Lastly do you deny that grace moveth or teacheth effectually because that all are not thereby effectually turned unto holiness then God worketh nothing effectually in any because he doth not in every one not in Peter because not in Iudas else to what purpose do you make this flourish M. B. Beside the Argument may be retorted upon him What word teacheth to deny ungodliness c. that sanctifieth c. but the law doth so Psal 119. A young man whose lusts are strongest c. may be cleansed by attending thereunto Answ But as it is retorted it hath no force in it for every word that teaceth doth not sanctifie therefore although the Law do teach it is no consequence your proposition is not universally true so you conclude nothing What say you of Philosophical precepts and instructions and of the dictating and teaching of every natural conscience do these sanctifie onely this word of grace that bringeth salvation doâ—â— so indeed if you mean Pharisaical washing of the outside onely as of hands cares eyes c. these laws have washed their disciples and hearers witness Paul before his conversion to the faith a man touching the Law blameless the whole generation of the Pharisees Aristides Socrates c. but what soul insides had they full of pride malice envy infidelity c. And many that I know of your legal stamp which like him that was born of the bond-woman condemn and persecute the children of the promise Gal. 4.29 That place in Psa 119. proveth no more but that a young man may be cleansed by attending to the word and who is against that or what maketh it for your opinion But that of Peter Martyr is most for our assertion for if the Law attain such effects onely when it is written in the hearts or bowels which cometh by the new Covenant Jer. 31. then it is not by the outward commandments or ministry of it And surely he could not conceive as you say that the Spirit doth use the Law to write it self in the heart but as both he and others affirm this is effected by the Gospel so Lex sola fide suffulta est The Law is established by the preaching of Faith which is the thing we contend for and you have brought nothing to weaken much less to overthrow
could not save by faith and salvation now not to be sought by grace onely in Jesus Christ saith the Margent But we believe through the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ to be saved even as they Fathers do Learned Zanchy stateth the question between Paul and the false teachers to be An praeter Christum c. whether besides Christ good works also be necessary to salvation Mr. B. And if this should be the sense of the Text then it was clear that the Galatians were not made partakers of Gods spirit by the corrupt doctrine that was taught them of late by their Seducers but before while they did receive the pure doctrine of Christ and therefore it was their folly having begun in the spirit to end in the flesh this may be a probable interpretation Answ Yet these exceptions may be against the latter part 1. The question made by the Apostle is divisive whether they received the Spirit by the doctrine of faith or by the other for by one they must needs have it And not whether they received the spirit by both doctrines conjoyned and confounded so that you mistake the form of the question 2. They begun in the spirit while they abode in the doctrine of Christ for righteousness and salvation onely and their folly in ending in the flesh was in that besides the righteousness of faith they would have also works of the law for salvation for this is to end in the flesh that is in themselves having begun in Christ by the spirit or as saith Piscator this is called an ending in the flesh because it is a way both heavy and impossible Mr. B. That which I shall stand upon is this The Jews and false Apostles when they went furthest joyned Christ and the observance of the moral Law equally together for justification and salvation whereas the Law separated from Christ did nothing but curse and condemn not being able to help the soul at all Answ It is as probable if not more as I said that they held Christ sufficient to justifie but not to save without works 2. They joyned Christ and the Law for justification and salvation say you And you joyn them for sanctification and salvation so no such great difference 3. If the Law separated from Christ did nothing but accuse and condemn then it seemeth if it be joyned with Christ it will acquit and justifie or you think it hath left that power to condemn being joyned to Christ Came Christ to take that power from the Law or to mitigate and meeken it by uniting it to himself or to redeem his elect from under the Law to live and abide where no Law is to accuse Rom. 8. Who can lay any thing to their charge Is not Christ also our sanctification and redemption as well as our justification without the Law 1 Cor. 1.30 This doctrine is of God saith Paul there but yours is but of man Also you disclaim that the Law of it self is able to stirre up the least Godly affection in us but Christ and Law together can and not Christ without it If the soul be married to Chist her husband he cannot make her to bring forth fruits to God but Moses the former dead husband must be raised up again and so the beleiver hath two husbands to make him fruitfull and both at one time a thing utterly against the Law and the Ordinance of Mariage civill or spirituall for as in the civill two are thereby become one flesh so they that are joyned to Christ are one spirit 1 Cor. 6.17 Mr. B. More places of Scripture are brought against this but they will come in more fitly under the notion of the Law as a Covenant Answ It 's true there are many more pag. 165. of the Assert unto which as many might be added but you have enough of these the rest you reserve to a more fit occasion And I had thought to have enlarged this point but that it is lost labour and I may ill spare any Mr. B. Thus therefore I shall conclude this point acknowledging that many learned and orthodox men speak otherwise and that there is a difficulty in clearing every particular about this question but as yet that which I have delivered carrieth the more probability with me Answ I thank you for your ingenuous and free acknowledgement I am not alone in this my opinion as yet I think you are in yours for any thing I mean that can be read in the Orthodox for otherwise the whole Colledge would not have given you such hearty thanks and your book so superlative commendation if they inclined not your way 2. Whereas you find difficulty that is because you have taken the staffe by the wrong and worst end contending against the clear truth I will not say against the light and checks of conscience But the more difficult the more fit for one of your quality and parts to encounter with that so your victory might happily have been more glorious Yet you have brought it no further even in your own thoughts but to be questio probabilis and you found it in as perfect condition and state when you entred upon it nay I say more I never read that it was controverted by any Protestant till now but your words imply that you may be of another mind to morrow The Lord instruct and establish us Mr. B. And I will give one Text more which I have not yet mentioned that is Act. 7.38 where the moral Law is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the lively cracles that is not verba vitae but verba viva vivificantia so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 giving life not that we could have life by vertue of obedience to them but when we by grace are inabled to obey them God of his mercy bestoweth eternal life Answ Before you were onely defensive sheilding your self as busily as you could against those Scriptures that fought against you but now you are disposed to give your adversary one stroke and yet the arm or weapon rather will not serve to fasten one blow either to hurt or fright this is but a childish skirmish or flourish It is granted the moral Law may be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lively oracles or words and so it is in its own nature yea and in the Ministry of it life is propounded as Deut. 30.19 I have set before you life and death and Levit. 18.5 Ye shall keep my statutes and my judgements which if a man keep he shall live in them but this life it promiseth to give is upon such tearms and impossible conditions that as yet none was quickned by it but contrarily it brought death upon all by reason of that poysonfull enmity and maliciousness of our common nature whereupon Paul is bold and peremptory to affirm that all that are of the works of the Law are cursed Gal. 3. this inbred enmity is discovered but not cured by
the Law Rom. 3.20 Rom. 7.7 Also you are much deceived when you say that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 See 1 Cor. 15.45 The first Adam was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a living soul nor as if he could quicken himself or others for that is peculiar to God himself no man as yet quickned his own soul And the opposition in that place sheweth the great difference between those two words for it followeth The last Adam was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a quickning spirit in that he both quickned himself being dead and quickneth all his members Lastly see that place Gal. 3.2 If there had been a Law which could have given life 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 righteousness should have been by the Law In which words Paul intimates that there was never Law given that could vivifie or which had any quickening vertue to impart or communicate unto any I will not trouble you with commentaries directly contradicting and overthrowing your exposition of that place because I perceive you so abound in your own sence that their judgement is not esteemed by you and you have greater store of them to satisfie you when you please then I have And lest you should be mistaken you adde Not that we could have life by vertue of any obedience but when we by grace are inabled to obey them c. Now I thought that you rather should have thus said as more pertinent to the question in hand But that they do instrumentally vivifie convert and give us life to obey them But in this saying of yours you grant as much as we contend for for if grace that cometh by the Gospel do inable us to obey the Law then it is not the Law that instrumentally doth convert and give life and strength to walk in it And your last clause is dangerously ambiguous seeming to import that Christ is not our salvation of himself without our works or obedience to the Law you will speak out more plainly and fully in some other place And you give us a poor reason why you inclined to this your opinion viz. because Socinians deny grace and justification under the Law or old Testament as if there were no middle way to take which could like you but either you must run on the rocks on one side or other Incidit in Scyllam c. Mr. B. And thus I come to another question which is the proper and immediate ground of strife between the Antinomians and us and from whence they have their name And that is the abrogation of the morall Law Answ Toto Coelo erras This is not the controversie except you mean that you do assert the Abrogation of it for it may sooner and more easily be concluded from your tenets then any of ours who hold the Law to be inviolable but this may appear afterward 2. If their name be from hence then if you prove them not guilty of the Abrogation of the Law you and others have falsly accused and standered them for Antinomians and now you for ever quit them from that aspersion I will be bold before the encounter if he that shall prove guilty of the abrogation of it in whole or in part shall be the Antinomian then mutato nomine de te narratur fabula look to your self Mr. B. Paul maketh an objection and he doth it for this end to take away the calumny and reproach cast upon him by his Adversaries as one that would destroy the Law Do we make void the Law Answ If you and your partners in your ministery did go with a right foot in the foot in the Gospel or tread in his steps the same would be charged upon you and you might be glad to pretend or wipe off such aspersions Hoc nomine pessime audiebat inter Judaeos non mode Paulus sed Dominus queque ipse acsi tota sua praedicatione legis abrogationem moliretur Nunquam tanta cautio c. Christ himself saith Calvin who is the wisdom of God could not so preach the doctrine of free-Grace but some took occasion from his words as you from ours to say or think he destroyed the Law hence was that prohibition Do not think I came to destroy the Law Matth. 5.17 Do you think your self more wise or wary in your Preaching then Christ or Paul was if not suspect your self in that you bear not the like reproach When innocency is thus traduced Presertim ver◠facile obtinet falsa hac imaginatio inter vos qui prepostera legis intelligentia c. Calv. and condemned quis stabit The Disciple is not above his Master if Christ and Paul were counted Antinomians Abrogaters of the Law who will not take up the same Cross And it is remarkeable by whom they were so opposed and aspersed even by the preposterous Zelots of Moses Law a generation which ever have and will hinder the free passage of the Gospel and disturb the peace of the Church like Cain Ishmael c. I thought here to have ended Sic ergo nes meminerimus Evangelium dispensare ut nostro decendi modo lex stabiliatur sed nulla alia firmitaetu quam fide Christi suffulta Id. but that in the closure I observe that you approve of Austins intepretation viz. The Law is established because by the Gospel we obtain grace in some measure to fulfill the law we obtain it not then by the Law and do obtain by faith in Christ still not by the Law then obedience in some degree to it Your eyes are strangely holden if you see not how this interpretation maketh fully for us and wholly against your self You adde Which obedience though it be not the Covenant of grace yet is the way to salvation Now there is nothing out of the covenant of grace can be proved to be in a strict and prosense the way to salvation Ubi ad Christum ventum est primum i◠eo invenitur exacta legi◠justitia quae por imputationem etiam nostra sit deinde sanctificatio qua sermantur cordae nostra ad legis observantiam c. Calv. To believe in Christ is the onely way to it Act. 16.31 Mark 16. Christ dwelleth in the heart by faith and he that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life Joh. 3.36 By attributing too much to the Law and our works you obscure the glory of Christ and of free-grace mingle Law and Gospel entangle and deject the hearts of the faithfull carry them from Christ and that union in spirit with him hinder the right exercise of faith and prayer c. for you teach that by the Law we receive grace conversion sanctification so that the Law enliveth filleth buildeth satisfieth It doth not make us poor feeble humble empty nothing in our selves that so we may seek out for all receive and live by faith in Christ our head grow up in him and so be built up in this way of
faith to the everlasting Kingdom You thus swerve from the truth and the old and good way LECT XXII ROM 3.31 Do we then make void the Law Here you tell us It is hard to set up Christ and grace and not thereby to be thought to destroy the Law But it is easie with who was never suspected 2. You say Your Antinomians still are mistaken in this point and plunged into a dangerous errour You should make your words good and discover the errour if not help them out we expect this from you 3. But now like blind Sampson unto whose fact you allude you have raised a doctrine which will lead you to lay your hands on the chiefe pillars of the Antinomian edifice Mr. B. The question then at this time to be discussed is whether the Law be abrogated or no by Christ to the believers under the Gospel Answ Who would question it for Christ came not to destroy the Law but taught that every Apex or lota of it is imperishable Matth. 5.17 18. Indeed your doctrine is the Law is deprived of all power to justifie accuse or accurse but who can receive it If these be no tittle or part of the Lawd understand nothing And yet you tell us often of promises of great rewards for your legall obedience and good works cherefore there is a power to justifie command and bless established by you or else which I rather think your tenets be inconsistent and mutually overthrow each other Mr. B. If we would speak exactly and properly we cannot say in any good sense that the Morall Law is abrogated at all Answ If you would keep there denying according to the truth of the Scripture any mitigation at all either totall or partiall we might soon agree shake hands and lay down our weapons Mr. B. We may say it is mitigated Answ It is then because your Tongues are your own or that you will speak before God say so and so without your Warrant Such teaching of mitigating and Evangelizing the Law of Gods accepting the will for deed c. hath occasioned such dangerous confusion of Law and Gospel these sad controverfies in the Church much instabilitie and many mistakes in the peoples minds c. Mr. B. But you must still distinguish when we speak of the Law some parts of it from the whole Some parts of it may be abolished and yet not the whole nature of it for there are in the Law these parts 1. Commands 2. Promises of life to him that doth them 3. The threatnings of eternal death to him that faileth Now the Morall Law although it be abrogated in respect of the two later to a believer yet in respect of the former it doth still abide yea and will continue in Heaven it self as we have already proved that one part of the Law may abide when the other doth not Answ Like Foundation like Building This makes all your opposition dispute and discourse so weak and soon annihilated in that your ground is so faulty and failing 1. Why are you so inconsiderate thus to distinguish where God doth not and so audacious as to mutilate his good Law which he delivered and would have still to be preserved entire and perfect 2. All this tendeth to nothing but to make the Kingdom and way of the Law so easie and tolerable that the soul may here find a requiem where to settle her abode and never enjoy nor come to Christ and dwell under his shadow and Kingdom where Grace through his righteousness reigneth to eternall life Rom. 5.21 3. What is the reason your discourse is so loose and improper did you not even now tell us that to speak properly and exactly we cannot say in any good sense the Morall Law is abrogated and have you so soon forgotten what you said or are you regardless of any good sense or propriety of words You make three parts I would know what parts they may be called Homogeneal all of them truely law as a drop of the Ocean is as verily water as the whole Sea or Heterogeneal as Timber and Stones be parts of a House but not of the same kinde and nature in themselves and the Soul and Body be two essential parts constituting the man yet the one as flesh the other as spirit and not of one of these alone but the compositum of both is the man So here I demand when you tell us we must distinguish some parts of the Law from the whole Whether these parts be essentiall and requisite to the making or constituting of the whole Law If these three be all parts then to take away two will mutilate if not destroy the whole Law the whole consisting but of three cannot be entire and perfect having lost two And the rather I ask this because pag. 139. you say but prove not for it is not your manner your Disciples and so all other must be jurati in verba Magistri that the Law most strictly taken is meer Mandative without any promises at all Now if the meer Mandative be a Law why do you call the other two there excluded as not needfull parts of it and not rather with Dr. Tailer appendices to it 4. To distinguish between part and part may be granted and usefull but as to distinguish between soul and body between Christ and his Church or between the signe and grace in the Sacrament but to separate and sunder one part from the the other you know here its intoleable and destructive and you so distinguish that you plainly separate and cut off two parts from the third as abolished And yet the whole nature of the Law remaineth if we can believe you not abrogated to the believer you have often put your Adversarie to reconcile his tenets when there was no such cause as you see here is to agree yours The Law in regard of the threats and promises say you is abrogated a very bold assertion which never can be made good When you promise eternall life unto every good work a believer doth as pag. 40. is it not a legall and conditionall promise so as no good work no eternall life and how then can you here say that the promises of the Law be abrogated to a believer And when a believer with Noah David Lot c. doth fall into open and scandalous offences do you not threaten and terrifie him that he may be moved and stirred up if he be secure to seek for healing by faith in the blood of Christ And doth not this also convincingly argue that the reproofs and threats of the Law are of force and not abrogated Lastly if the preceptive part continue in Heaven you cannot say that justice there shall be without power for the two other also what though it doth not actually condemn any Is God without power to make another World because he maketh it not And whereas you say That you have already proved two parts to be abrogated and one still abiding you either forget
contradiction but it is in your own tenets which cross and overthrow one another And you deny God to have any Soveraigne or Reigning power in his Law but onely a Ruling and that also with much mitigation and abatement of rigour in his justice which yet is as indefinite as unwarrantable In ruling and commanding by his Law he may promise no peace life nor good say you unto the obedient nor threaten and condemn the disobedient Thus you exauthorize God in the Kingdom of his Law and put him down from two parts of his justice and power regall Mr. B. The Law is no more abrogated to a believer under the old Testament then to one under the new Answ You mean it is as much abrogated that is nothing at all Mr. B. They carry it as if it were abrogated onely to believers under the Gospel Now how can this ever be made good for either they must deny that there were any believers under the old Testament or if there were then they are freed from it as much as any man Answ Indeed we hold and teach according to the Scriptures that in the daies of the Gospel God calleth unto and maketh his elect partakers of a far more free excellent and comfortable state and condition then was before Christ as Galat. 4.1 2. Now I say that the Heire as long as he is a Child differeth nothing from a servant though he be Lord of all But is under Tutors untill the time appointed by the Father You say Either we must deny that there were any believers under the old Testament or they were freed as much as any now Let any of a mean capacity but mark the Apostles words The Heir so long as he is a Child differeth nothing from a servant c. this representeth the state of believers in that Infantile age which differeth not from a servant how then say you that they were freed from the Law as much as now will you make the condition of the Child being six or seven yeers old and so kept under his Guardian and Tutor to be as free as when being of full age he is at his own disposing You say If the Law be taken for the whole administration you grant it was Pedagogicall and more servile But was not this servility principally yea and as concerning the conscience and the spirituall state of the soul solely caused by the Morall Law which like a thick cloud and dark of sin and wrath Rom. 3.21 Rom. 4.15 did interrupt and hinder their light and make the Heavens black over their heads so that they could not all that while break perfectly thorow that veil which lay so on them the sacrifices and other ceremonies indeed were a burthen and bondage in respect of the outward state but not as pertaining to the conscience which is chiefly intended by Paul And therefore it must be understood of that servility they were in by the Morall Law more then now and in regard of this Morall Law especially saith Calvin were they said to be under a heavy yoke as Act. 15.10 And how can the Law Pedagogically taken be the same to them as to us in respect of justification and salvation as you tell us whereas you granted this Administration to be altogether antiqnated pag. 205. l. 20. Mr. B. If then we speak of the Law in regard of the essential parts of it which are directing and commanding threatning and promising life upon perfect obedience these are still equally in power or else equally abrogated to all believers under the old or new Testament Answ If these all and every of them be now confessed to be essentiall parts of the Law then none of these be appendices or meer accessaries as D. Tailer accounteth them and you in pag. 59. do make direction and obligation the onely essentiall parts of a Law and threatnings and premises to be but consequences required ad bene esse so inconsistent and mutable are you in your positions And if these also be essentiall why did you oppose it in the Assertion of grace Againe then to abrogate any of these is more then to diminish one Apex or Iota of the Law and so who now is become least in the Kingdome of God But lastly the Law in regard of these is not equally in power to the faithfull under both Testaments for it is more then evident that the believing Jews were put under the teaching and government of it as a Child in non-age is made subject to his Schoolmaster or Tutor and that by the will and appointment of God Gala. 4 13. Gala. 3.23 Before faith came we were kept under the Law c. 24. Wherefore the Law was our Schoolmaster unto Christ 25. But after faith is come we are no longer under a School-master Now the time appointed by God the Father was till the resurrection of Christ which he calleth the coming of faith or tempus Evangelii the time of preaching the Gospel to all for the obedience of faith and hereby he calleth and bringeth his Church into a more fice and happy condition therefore now is the Church said to receive the Adoption of the Sonnes Gala. 4.5 that is say Interpreters The liberty and right pertaining to Sonnes which was not granted before Christ was exhibited And saith Calvin Truly Paul doth not speak here only of the ceremonies nor of the Morall Law severally but comprehendeth the whole oeconomy or Ministery of Moses by which God then governed his people And if the whole then it followeth that the Law Morall is not now equally in power as then Also do not you say that the Morall Law is onely now of force to a believer in the mandative and directive part but not in the promissive or threatning So that it concerneth you to consider that those Arments for subjection under the old Testament are not so strong and valid against believersnow sith the Church is in the condition of the Heir that is grown up and of ripe age Mr. B. Therefore it is wild divinity of an Antinomian Hony C. pag. 6. who makes three different estates of the Church 1. Vnder the Law 2. Vnder John the Baptist 3. Vnder the Gospel Answ Why is it wilde In that it groweth not in your Garden or liketh not your fancy so also there are other pretious truths like choice flowers which are disliked and cast out as unsavory weeds by your Doctrine and Ministery You should have shewed some cause of distaste which you do not unless you include it in these words He compareth these together and sheweth how we under the Gospel exceed those of the Law c. but here I see that as you cannot receive it for truth so you dare not plainly reject it for errour The Authour in that point hath given full satisfaction to the indifferent Reader otherwise I should adde much more There is great difference between the time of promise and of exhibition or performance It was revealed unto the Prophets that
in the ceremonies then used as you imply Mr. B. In what sense the Apostle argueth against the Law Answ Truly he argueth not against it in any true sense at all but for it to give and maintain all its rights Mr. B. The proper state of the question in those daies appeareth Act. 15. where you have a relation made of some believing Jews of the sect of the Pharisees who pressed the necessity of circumcision c. Answ See Act. 15.5 There arose up certain of the Sect of the Pharisees which believed saying That it was needfull to circumcise them and to command them to keep the Law of Moses Note that expression which believed So that the question was then Whether that circumcision and the keeping of the Law were needfull to be conjoyned with the faith of Christ in the point of salvation and ver 11. makes it more plain We believe through the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ to be saved even as did they also I confess your first words might import as much but you are not constant but shrinke much from this And tell us what opinion the Jews were generally of who thought that the observation of the morall Law without Christ was enough for their peace and comfort In your prosecution of it you sejoyne what in the proposition was rightly conjoyned Those Jews who thought as you say That the external performing of the ceremonies and a life outwardly conformable to the morall Law would secure them they did oppose Christ and perfecute his Gospel as 1 Thes 2.14 15. But the other mentioned Act. 15. did receive and preach the Gospel though not according to the simplicity that is in Christ 2 Cor. 11.3 but added and mingled other things to that of faith and so overthrew the whole Gospel and salvation also Hence it was the Apostle peremptorily said that If they were circumcised Christ profited them nothing implying that they would have Christ and circumcision too Your words are That the Apostle speaketh seemingly derogatorily to the Law because they took it without Christ But he indeed derogated not from it but acknowledged it to be good if used lawfully but they did otherwise not in taking it without Christ as you affirm but in conjoyning it with him as if he alone were not sufficient to salvation as well as to righteousness without the works of the Law Take you heed of this way and kinde of teaching Mr. B. Now where the Law seemeth to be abrogated it is taken either 1 Synecdochically put for that part which actually condemneth as Gal. 5. Against such is no Law for he speaketh as if there were nothing in the Law but condemnation Whereas we may say the Law is by way of direction and prescription for a thing as well as against it by accusation Answ If it be said the Law of our Land hath nothing against you or to accuse you of in point of homicide Is this any seeming abolition of the Law while your innocency is cleared and justified the Law suffereth no diminution by it how tryfling and childish is this your discourse 2. If the Law be for a thing in direction and against it by accusation then by Pauls doctrine still it hath lost nothing of its power Thus the constant mistake is not ours but yours who most abolish the Law indeed Mr. B. First He is without the Law that is without the understanding of it thus the Gentiles Secondly Without the sense and experience of the terrifying power of it as Paul Rom. 7. Now the godly though they be denied to be under the Law yet are not said to be without it Answ It is true the faithfull have both understanding and experience of the Law but now faith Luther It is their cheif point of wisdom to be ignorant of the Law Is not this a Paradox or Parable You say Paul Rom. 4.14 cannot mean the Law of Moses for that was long after a poor reason Doth he not in Gal. 3. deny the blessing and inheritance of Abraham to be by the Law but by promise and yet ver 11. he saith The Law was 430 yeers after When the blessing was promised to come in that way to Abraham there was no question but now since the circumcision and the Law were after added to the promise and have been of so long continuance is that question thereby occasioned In the fifth Interpretation of what it is to be under the Law your words are nothing against us but rather confirme that exposition of Rom. 6.14 which is in the Assertion of grace against D. T. But observe withall how here you oppose Law and grace in sanctifying and healing which formerly you so much contradicted You say The Law is never so much alive as in the godly who most obey it But I say It is the spirit of Christ that quickeneth them by the Gospel to love and obey the Law and their obedience floweth from this life of faith as an expression of it He that liveth by faith as Gal. 2.19 20. keepeth the Law joyfully and freely LECT XXIIII Deut. 4.13 And he declared to you his Covenant c. Mr. B. I Have already handled the Law as a rule and now come to consider it as a Covenant that so the whole Law may be fully understood Answ Your undertaken be great and your promises sat and fair but never knew I worse success nor less performance I muse that these points so weighty and so much controverted should be so sleightly handled and your Affirmative part so weakly confirmed by a man of your learning Suppose all be clear and unquestionable to your self which I cannot believe now yet others need more light then as yet you hold forth And your Adversaries see nothing to convince and satisfie them You tell us He that is so blinde that he cannot see by the light of one Sun would not see any more if there were a thousand Suns Alas do you think that he that readeth then shall find these your elaborate and judicious Lectures so clear and beyond exception that he is like unto him that hath the nooneday to walke in and is strangely blinded if any thing be rejected as erronious or questioned as obscure To give you my ingratefull opinion I neither see light of one Sun nor yet of one beam of it I fear you are too self-conceited and self-confident I say no more but Aliorum esto judicium We are now being made publique to be censured by others Now you come to consider the Law as a Covenant c. Answ Then it is not simply a rule but it may be you will help this somwhat by telling us of a more large acception of the Law yet that is not to speak precisely to the point in controversie also though your considerations be divers yet the Law is constantly the same Your doctrine that the Law was delivered in Mount Sinai in a Covenant-way or it was a Covenant God made with his people I list not
to meddle with by-matters You then shew what a Covenant is And as here you say You find much difference of judgement so I say You are unhappily perswaded to incline to the most unlikely unfound and palpably erronious opinion of all others if yet you have any to travel and go with you in your way but you love cross and by-wayes that you may be better noted to become famous or infamous Mr. B. The Law as to this purpose may be considered more largely as that whole doctrine delivered on Mount Sinai with the preface and promises adjoyned and all things that may be reduced to it or more strictly as it is an abstracted rule of righteousness holding forth life upon no terms but perfect obedience Now take it in the former sence it was a Covenant of grace take it in the later it was not of grace but of works Answ This is first to be premised and we take it as granted by you that however you consider the Law yet you mean onely the moral Law Yet you will not be contented with the simple and entire law as it is an absolute law in it self but do take in also unto it the preface promises and all things reduceable your extent of it is now become large indeed and to me indefinite What you draw in and reduce to it who knoweth But I smell some feare and diffidence in this great enterprize your own thoughts being apprehensive of the unjustifiableness of this strange and bold assertion you would not therefore be too narrowly kept in but will take more scope and ground then is allowable but let this pass and to come to a more particular reply Methinks the Pieface it self should have been sufficient to have stopt you in this your way or opinion Thus it is recorded Exod. 20.2 and Deut. 5.6 I am the Lord thy God which brought thee out c. out of which I collect and it is plain and undenyable That God was their God and Israel his people before the giving of the Law and that he did not in these words express his wilingness and consent to be their God if or upon condition they will keep these his Commandments which you call the first thing belonging to a Covenant therefore he saith Hear I am thy God that is I am now already thy God namely by free promise in the seed of the woman Gen. 3. or as it was made to Abraham and his posterity Gen 12.3 Gal. 3.6 To Abraham and his seed were the promises made And unto this promise or Covenant of grace then which I know no other in simple nature and essence or substance they had given and professed their consent formerly by their faith and externally by receiving circumcifion the signe of the Covenant and so avouched God to be their only God in Christ and themselves his people through him And he being their God and King it pleased him now to deliver unto them his will in this way and form of Government according to which he would rule them and they were to conform themselves to his pleasure herein 2. And this promise given by God and believed on by them so long before this promulgation and solemne delivery of the Law was entire of it self containing perfection of doctrine and holding out a free and clear way to pardon reconciliation and life And therefore it was singly made preached at first to Adam and Abraham with his posterity so that Paul saith Gal. 3.18 God gave the Inheritance that is all the blessedness belonging to a Child bylpromse denying and excluding the Law in this And hence is it that to prevent all objections against the doctrine of free grace Paul saith Rom. 5.20 Moreover the Law entered that the offence might abound 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 id est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the Law entered besides the promise of grace which was the prime and principall doctrine and it entered into the Church or among the people of God and yet neither to disannull nor to adde any thing unto the former Covenant or promise Gal. 3.15 as if of imperfect before it was to be perfected thereby Nor yet as if it were to be mingled with the promise and so to adulterate it but it was to be kept distinct from it as being of another nature and for another end contrary to that of the promise The Law was to uncover sin terrifie the conscience exclude the soul from Gods favour and presence the promise to cover to pacifie and comfort and to admit or give entrance again with confidence through faith in Christs blood The Law was to make sin abound that upon that occasion the ampleness and efficaciousness of the grace promised in Christ might be more abundant And as for the promises of the Law Piscator telleth you That they are to be excluded the Covenant of grace as being of a diverse nature or quality from those promises of grace The promise of grace is Nuda simplex gratuita the legall promises are Conditionales But now we will consider by what Scriptures and Reasons you would confirm it First you say Mr. B. There is nothing more ordinary with Paul in these controversies then to consider the Law so differently as take this instance Rom. 10.5.6 where he descibeth the righteousness of the Law from these words Do and live c. We find this in effect Deut. 30.16 and yet from this very chap. The Apostle describes the righteousness which is by faith And Beza doth acknowledge that that which Moses speaks of the Law Paul applieth to the Gospel Answ We might expect a more plain and clear text then this which is so knotty and difficult that it hath troubled the best commentators if yet you could produce any â—er verbum entelligit M. Legem quam Dominus voce sua promulgavit P. autom ad praedicationem Evangelii quae fuit Legis perfectio accommodat B. but your poor shift and nakedness is manifest If you stand here to Beza his words make directly against you What Moses speaks of the Law Paul applieth to the Gospel saith he Moses said thus of the Law and Paul of the Gospel Thus then by his interpretation 1. The Law is not one with the Gospel nor doth it comprehend it but containeth a doctrine in kinde differing from the Gospel or Covenant of grace 2. He seemeth to be of that judgement with many others that Paul doth but allude to that place in Moses and doth not directly and purposely cite Moses for confirmation and this is most probable in that something is added some left out and something altered Calvin thinkes the knot may easily be untied Sed totam in genere doctrinam quae â—vangelium sub se compreâ—endat c. thus If by the word we understand not the law but the whole doctrine of God in general as it comprehendeth the Gospel for saith he The word of the Law never cometh of it self to be in the
Father to him so that he will be dutiful and obedient to you now you are not his Father nor he your Child upon this condition though in this way you may manifest and express your affections at your pleasure Now take a view of your six Arguments and let us know what be your second thoughts of them and also your answer to those places so fully meeting and opposing you in this your way as the Angell did Balaam in his way is infirm and nothing satisfactory Mr. B. If that in Gal. 3.18 and Rom. 4.14 be rigidly and universally true then the doctrine of the Socinians would plainly prevail who from these do urge there was no grace nor faith nor nothing of Christ vouchsafed unto the Jews whereas they had the adoption though their state was a state of bondage Answ 1. Truth is to be received in love to it for it self though no errour nor danger a thing impossible should be prevented by it 2. If Socinians do urge those places to inferre that no grace c. come by the Law but by the promise onely made and given long before let us see how you would except against this but both you and the Socinians are wide and deceived though not in the same way 3. They had the adoption indeed but that was by faith in the promised seed and the putting them under that pedagogy of Moses made their state so servile What you say in the rest of this Lecture hath been presented to us before where also the answer and satisfaction is to be found LECT XXV Rom. 3.27 Where is beasting then c. I Cannot cease to muse that you so prosecute your matter in this large acception and sense of the Law knowing that the question is of the morall strictly taken You chuse rather to keep the thickets and bushes then to appear in the open plains we may guess why Yet take notice that the doctrine you raise doth not grow from your text no not in your own exposition for you expound it of the Law of works strictly taken as it is opposed to the Law of faith But your doctrine you so frame and carry as that you tell us The Law as a Covenant of grace given to the Israelites in some sense doth oppose the grace of the Gospel which assertion suppose true yet is no fruit of this tree hath not its rise from your text 2. Being witty to coyne and devise things of your own head without Scripture-ground you say it is for this end viz. To discover the nature of the Law and Gospel a fair pretence and promise without reality of performance for you rather cover and darken then otherwise 3. You bring in Calvin to little purpose who distributes the Law into three kindes and he doth not say that the morall Law differeth only from the Gospel in regard of clearer manifestation but denyeth it to have or contain any grace in it and so in nature and kinde to differ from the Gospel or word of grace and not gradually onely And the like may be said of Pareus 4. You have often received what is thought of your so often sod Coleworts presented here again to the Reader that they under the Law did enjoy grace c. viz. that they had it not by the Law c. Mr. B. That the doctrine of the Law in the more preceptive nature of it may be compared with the doctrine of the Gospel having the grace of God axnexed to it and going along with it now this in some respects is an unequall comparison Answ Why do you now more straiten the Law then did Calvin in that his testimony who takes the Law for that rule of life in which God requireth of us that which is his own giving us no ground of hope unless in every respect we walke according to it And you tell us of the Gospel having the grace of God annexed to it c. as if the Gospel could be separated from that grace which is the subject matter of it for doth the Gospel speak of or hold forth unto us any thing else beside the grace of God is so proper and peculiar to the Gospel that not one word of it is mentioned in the Law for the Law is of works and the Gospel is called the word of his grace But perhaps you will say By grace you mean the spirit of life that reneweth and quickeneth the soul if you do so yet it hath been cleared that although the Spirit do not alway and in all produce and work this work of renovation yet the Gospel is the ordinary instrument that is used for this and not the Law That expression of yours If you take the doctrine or letter of the Gospel without the grace of God is very improper for it is as if you could take the writing without the matter it specifieth and entreateth of Again observe that the difference between the letter of the Gospel and the letter of the Law as you call them is in that the Law is said then to kill when the spirit worketh effectually by it for then sin reviveth in the conscience and so J died saith Paul Rom. 7.9 and so the Commandment was found to be to death ver 10. but the Gospel then killeth and leaveth in death and condemnation when the spirit worketh not in the heart to receive and mingle it by faith Heb. 4.2 Joh. 3.19 2 Cor. 4.4 Your counsel is good to make the parallel equal but this is unequal in you still to make Law and Gospel equally and alike the instrument of grace and life Mr. B. pag. 2 3 4. I come to the Antinomian difference and there I finde such a one that I am confident was never heard of before In Hony Comb God saith he saw sin in believers of the old Testament but not in the new c. Answ Our weakness makes us stumble and to be offended where no cause is sometime and with too much confidence to condemn or reject such pretious truths as are received and justified by the Children of wisdome I have spoken before to this phrase In sobriety of mind ponder this The Scripture doth not say that Christ did actually take and do away sin till he came and shed his blood for that purpose and the object of their faith in the old Testament was the promise of future good things to be done and wrought by Christ when the fulness of time appointed came Gal. 4.4 so that God is said to have patience in bearing with his people till he received full satisfaction Rom. 3.25 and this finished and plenary work of redemption that the Gospel holdeth forth to us was the object of their hope who onely lived in a certain expectation of it according to the promise yet did that faith and hope both sustain save and serve them sufficiently according to that their condition wherein it pleased the Father to place them Their Gospel in brief was That Christ should appear and
dispense them as he pleased more sparingly then then now LECT XXVI Rom. 3.27 Where is beasting theu c. WHatever your reason or ends may be for it yet I see not any good or warrantable ground thus to take and handle the Law and Gospel in a large sense as you say and when you have done I would know what of the Gospel you conceive to be legall and how much Law you take to be Evangelicall Also you prefixe a Text as your foundation but the discourse you erect doth not touch it is not at all supported by it but stands like a Castle built in the Air. Neither do I find the Lutherans posing the Calvinists about the Law in this for both affirm the Law to be a Covenant of works and superadded to the promise holding forth all favour and peace upon such hard conditions to the Jews that they might experimentally be convinced of their folly in seeking it by their own righteousness You must go over it again else what is done will not serve to prove Moses Law a Covenant of grace Indeed we grant the godly Jews did enjoy what Christ premised but it was by such Ordinances as were of grace and not of works as is the Law they eyed or looked at Christ in the promises and not in precepts And as you began so you proceed laying down differences not between the Law and Gospell but between Gospel and Gospel I mean the administration of grace before and now of which others have writ more particularly plainly and profitably Then you tell us They Jews had a twofold consideration 1. as being servile another as being Sons but under age Now that is it that we say As Sons they were free for they were so by Christ promised but their condition was servile and their immunities and priviledges were in a great part vailed and kept from them But note that the Mosaicall pedagogy is antiquated what need was it to handle law or Gospel otherwise then in their strict and proper sense To run over every thing is long and tedious What is said by you of these differences may be granted with these two exceptions first that the law strictly taken is not as you say onely for those who have a perfect and holy nature Paul doth directly cross and contradict it saying The Law is not made for the righteous but for the Lawless and disobedient 1 Tim. 1.9 And Adam was not charged with this law in his integrity but had a Law touching a thing in its own nature indifferent for the keeping of this law was then naturall to him as is flying to a Bird and bearing fruit to a Tree or Hearbe Also it is clear that the law was added because of transgression Gal. 3.19 as if there had been no sinne there should have been no occasion of giving the law And this contradicts your self elsewhere affirming the Law to be an effectuall instrument to regenerate and sanctifie Now who needs to be regenerated and sanctified he that hath a perfect and holy nature or he that is a sinner and impure if you think otherwise what a deceiver are you when you would perswade the filthy and the vile that they may be changed and renewed by the Law of works And thus as your fourth difference is utterly false so your third is found to be defective and not plenary for all is of grace It is the Gospel or word of grace that justifieth and sanctifieth God in that ministration we live under is a free giver and man a meer receiver for God having discovered and made bare the root and heart of man so as he seeth his spirituall poverty and wretchedness by his Law doth then open his graciousness and his bountifull hand by his Gospel that the believing soul may be satisfied with his goodness in every kinde So that now as a Beggar he must live by Almes of Divine liberality being thus made to walk humbly with his God Open thy mouth and I will fill it Psa 81. 2. And in your last difference you set up and pull down say and unsay At first you tell us The Law is conditionall but the Gospel absolute but this is too clear a ground for you to abide upon therefore presently you say I finde this question a troublesome one Thus you trouble your self and others without cause Repentance and faith are no Gospel-conditions but are said to be the reason and end of the preaching of the Gospel It is preached that men may repent and believe Rom. 16.26 Luk. 14.47 yea and that they may be holy too Tit. 2.12 Ephes 4.22 Secondly The Gospel is the seed of them all as is to be cleared afterward they all grow and arise out of the doctrine of grace how then can they be conditions of it for what is a condition but that which is necessarily required that a thing may be so so that it will follow It is no Gospel where there is no faith or repentance or at least none preached to me What am I called upon to believe then The Gospel is the object of faith and in believing are we said to receive and obey it 2 Thes 1.8 The Gospel offereth pardon favour and eteruall life to sinners that they may come receive and partake of all freely yea beseeches men to be reconciled And doth not bid them go and get repentance and faith and holiness elsewhere as they can and then upon condition they bring these they shall be forgiven all their sins be reconciled and saved by the Gospel Indeed where God maketh the Gospel to be effectual there it bringeth forth these fruits there is repentance and saith to believe and it giveth no peace nor consolation to any but the believing soul so as faith is after the hearing of the Gospel so comfort is after faith Rom. 15.13 The God of all hope fill you full of peace and joy in believing In order one precedes another Gospel is preached before Faith that men may believe and then comes peace and consolation upon believing But who would argue hence that Faith is a condition of the Gospel or Peace a condition of Faith They denote a certaine Order that God is pleased to set and observe in his works and dispensations As for Mortification and Sanctification you speak of they are the effects of the Gospel for the soul thereby called and implanted into Christ beginneth to dye unto all things and to live only unto Christ and God in him so increasing with the increasings of God Col. 2.19 And Repentance admitteth of divers considerations in regard of some whereof it is Legall and of others Evangelical but of this next Lecture LECT XXVII Rom. 3.27 Where is boasting It is excluded c. IF this Question Whether the Gospel preach Repentance or no be as you affirme the foundation of Antinomanisme It then much concerneth you in this to play the man that the foundation being razed all may fall to confusion and this the rather also
Ministerii sumpla and the express words in the text do make it more then manifest that the Apostles comparison is taken from the very substance of Moses Ministery to wit the Morall Law and not that part onely which is Ceremoniall as you would have it for verse 7. it is called that Ministery that is written and engraven in stones Whence it is easie to gather that Paul speaketh not of the Ceremoniall Impressum insculptum ex hoc locoisacile colligitur Paulum non agere de Ceremoniis sed de ipse Decalego B. but Morall part for it was the Decalogue that was so written and delivered in Tables of Stone 2 Your words imply that there is no difference in truth and strict sence between Law and Gospel so that the Spirit be taken with them both which directly contradicteth the Apostle who calleth one the Ministery of death and condemnation and the other of life and righteousness for the Spirit working by the Law doth kill and condemn and therefore is also called a Spirit of boudage Rom. 8.15 but the Spirit by the Gospel quickneth and giveth life being a Spirit of Adoption and liberty The Spirit is one and the same but the Ministrations be different and so are the effects produced by either You say the difference is because Christ the Author of the Gospel is the fountain of Life But is not Christ the Author of the Law also He is called the law-giver And though Christ be the Author of Life yet you cannot shew wheâ—e the Law is called the Ministery of Life as if Christ did use it to convey and give Life Also to say that the Spirit quickeneth by the Law is to enforce a sense flatly against the Apostle Moreover your expressions do make the place more obscure dark in telling us that the Gospel also without Gods Spirit is the Ministration of death because it is as impossible to believe as to obey the Law Whereas Paul therefore calleth the Gospel the Ministration of righteousness and life in that the Spirit thereby begetteth faith in the hearts of the Elect whereby they come to righteousness and life So Piscator The Law then having the Spirit working by it killeth as we see in Paul Rom. 7. But the Gospel maketh alive justifying all the Elect of God 2. You fail much in your second respect also for 1. as is proved and cleared that the opposition is chiefly between the Morall Law and the Gospel 2 However in a proper and true sense the Law is done away in the kingdom of Christ yet where infidelity is the Law remaineth but where the word of righteousness and life is there can the Ministery of sin and death have no place even no more then the darkness of midnight hath at noon-day but spirituall things are spiritually discerned 3. Paul intends that glory to be of the Law whereas you interpret it to be that accidentall glory which did shine upon Moses A word of these things shall suffice LECT XXIX Matth. 5.17 Whosoever shall break one of these least c. SEe and consider the words of the Prophet Psal 7.14 15 16. This Lecture above all yet sheweth much gall to be in your ink Now your task is neer an end The residue is but to make a grave or ditch for your Antinomian and to describe and delineate the man that all mistake being prevented he may forthwith be sentenced and sent to his appointed place but stay Where or who is he You are in a golden dream Mr. B. When there shall be a reformation and truth break forth c. then those corrupt Teachers who would poyson men should be discovered and be of least that is of no account Answ Seeing this will be when the truth breaketh forth Now Lord send forth thy light and thy truth that all false teachers and doctrines of lies and vanities may be put to shame and confusion And if your dream be true look to your self You fear not perhaps presuming upon your own supposed innocency externall sanctity the present state of our times the reputation you are in the authority and multitude of your combined fraternity c. as being now set upon a mountaine that will never be moved But the Church the Truth and quarrell is Gods He is strong that is Judge to put down the mighty from their seats to scatter the imaginations of the proud and to returne all the intended evill upon the head of the authors and devisers In him the fatherless find mercy he preserveth the simple and meek that trust in him Read Isa 66.5 Hear the word of the Lord ye that tremble at his word Your Brethren that have cast you out for my Names sake said Let the Lord be glorified but he shall appear to your joy and they shall be ashamed and Joh. 16.2.3 Some look for no better from your hands if left unto your will and have already sound the like dealing for the Scripture must be verified Mr. B. They overthrow the law when they hold such principles that will necessarily by way of consequence inferre the abrogation of the Law And thus though some Antinomians do expresly and boldly assert the abolishing of it at least to believers Yet others c. disclaiming it held such assertions as necessarily inferre the abrogation of it Answ You cannot prove and make it appear that any do assert the abolishing of it so it may be taken for a slander and false accusation 2. In way of correction as having overshot your self and would eat some of your Words You say At least to believers Now first What need believers a Law so farre as believers they live by Faith and walke by Faith yea and warre by Faith 2. The Law affordeth nothing to nourish or supply any defect in the Christians Faith 3. Yet you nor none can directly and duely inferre hence that they do abrogate the Law so much now to vindicate them But to returne your words upon your self I think that you do hold such principles that necessarily by way of consequence at least do abrogate the Law yea and make void repentance in great part after Faith is come and bring in carnal security and a false peace into the soul for one principle of yours is That direction and obligation to obedience be the sole essential constitutes of the law So that that which condemneth justifies promiseth and threatneth is not properly the Law but it hath been not onely asserted but proved already that these are as assential to a Law as the former Again What will you call that which doth condemn and promise favour and peace to the good if it be not Law I am sure it is no Gospel have you a third name for it 2. Whence have these power to condemn c. if no Law be in them The Scripture faith The Law doth curse reveal wrath c. I argue thus Whosoever denieth the Law a power to condemn and justifie he destroyeth the Law But Mr. Burg.
denieth this to the Law Therefore Mr. B. destroyeth and abrogateth the Law and so is the true Antinomian and least in the kingdom of God This is so plain that I leave it to your consideration with what hath been said formerly In the next place you say The Law hath power over a believer to direct command and oblige to duty but not to condemn Now I reply Suppose a believer hath no will nor disposition to obey in some things or at somtimes hath the Law no further power to threaten and condemn then the Law will soon become an Aesops block vilified and brought into contempt Also grant a believer having the spirit is freely disposed and willing to obey yet his obedience will be but partial and defective and if then the Law have no power to accuse and threaten in that way of new obedience he may trust henceforth in his own works have his peace in that way of duty and not by his Faith in Christ and thus grow self-consident and secure but Paul who consented to the Law delighted in it c. yet in that he attained not to that perfect righteousness of it cryed out Oh wretched man that I am Rom 7.24 And if the curse be now gone to a believer from the Law what further use or need hath he of his justification and of the preserving and maintaining his continual peace onely thereby Lastly Confession of sin self-humiliation self-judging and condemning the accounting of our own righteousness as dung the fear of it and the constant desire to be still found in Christ not having our own righteousness c. these will have no more place in us What need Noah to keep in the Ark if there be no drowning waters without what need Christ a refuge or protection where no power of the Law is to pursue nor no danger to be feared These and many such like be the consequences and fruit of your doctrine or assertions And note that either to curse c. is not so much as an Iota or tittle of the Law a hard thing to affirm much more to prove or you offer too much violence to the good and inviolable law of God in daring to part and seperate these from the Law every whit of it being imperishable and incur that danger your self as Mal. 5.17 18. Yet you have such an evil eye and spite against us that you say pag. 269. Mr. B. The Antinomians do more fall against this text then any who teach the disobligation not onely of the least Command but of the whole Law Answ The contrary is apparently true let the judicious Christian Reader looking through all our discourse hitherto judge how untrue and unreasonable your charge is The law bindeth continually to duty and to the curse for the least failing And faith uncessantly acquitteth and looseth setteth free the soul like those two keys which Christ left to his Church to continue with it untill the end In the law I am bound in faith set free M. B. It argueth impudency of those who would make Luther on their side because of his 6. disputations against the Antinomians Answ But if his disputations be against the Antinomians then they may be against your self and in no wise against us we establish and maintain the law in the utmost extension 2. You shew nothing asserted by any you quarrel withall which in effect may not be found in Luther so that he is for them 3. Yet it is not his opinion but the truth we contend for And whos 's those scattered Propositions were that you have so collected I know not but with a good construction divers of them may be received and justified And are held affirmatively by such as are not suspected guilty of Antinomianisme You spare not still to take and scrape together what you can to make us odious that we may be utterly cashiered saying Luther calleth those Hostes legis organa Satanae quid furores Antinomorum their doctrine is more to be taken heed of then Papists And also present the world afresh with those unfavoury and false records of D.T. M.B. which two have writ more then you lift to defend Psal 52.2 or they could justifie yet you love to have a hand in their sin and had rather side with them whose Tenents are so erroneous and unsound then give a favourable construction to one more Orthodox then your self But I see great mercy from the Lord shining through this thick and dark cloud of your malice You are witnesses to your selves saith Christ That ye are the children of them who killed the Prophets Fill ye up then the measure of your Fathers Mat. 23.31 33. M. B. In their Books every Error is more warily dressed then in secret Answ And still no Error can come to light 2. The Proverb is true You muse as you use I think your ordinary or Pulpit-divinity is more grosse or not so pure as we finde you here and yet upon you review this may be reproveable If your you can see in secret you may judge what is done in secret as God doth else De secret is now judicat Ecelesia M. B. It cannot be denied but in some parts of their books be some good passages as in a wood full of brambles be some violets and primroses Answ What wise man so clear sighted as your self would not gather the fragrant and useful flowers and forbear rather wholly to meddle with the bushes then so to trouble pricke and endanger himself as you have here done M. B. The Author of the Assert of grace disclaims the opinion against the law yet there affirmes such principles from whence this conclusion will necessarily follow Answ It is but your conceit of such a conclusion to make it indeed you must be forced to add of your owne unto the premises but proceed to justifie your Accusation M. B. For first he makes no real difference either in Scripture or use of words between the law reigning and ruling so that if the Law rule a man it ruleth over him now then they deny the law to reign over a believer therefore they must needs hold it cannot be a rule Answ If your Adversary say there is no real difference between reigning and ruling It is your part who oppose him to make the difference appear by Scripture or some way else but this you do in no place so often as you repeat it which maketh me thinke verily you cannot And you are not of that credit with me that your bare word can carry it Yet since you thus slightly pass over that which you make the main ground of your oppsition and this failing all you say falleth to nothing I yet shall add a little to occasion and provoke more diligence and better inquisition hereafter 1. I argue thus To grant or leave unto God onely a power to rule in his law and to deny him the reigning power is to make God in his law like an inferiour Magistrate who
curse and condemn yet it hath power to rule command and direct 4. The Law with the preface and promise added to it was given as a Covenant of Grace 5. The Law is taken most strictly for that is meer mandatory without any promise at all 6. God doth use his Law as he doth his whole word to beget and to increase the life of Grace 7. While a Minister is preaching any commandment he doth thereby mould and new-frame the heart 8. I suppose that Christ hath obtained of God by his death that such efficacy and vertue should go forth in the Ministery that whether it be Law or Gospel the souls of men may be healed and converted thereupon 9. I cannot yeild to that that the Law worketh only preparatorily 10. There was never in the Church of God meer pure Law or meer pure Gospel 11. Onely two things go to the essence of a Law 1. Direction 2. Obligation 12. In the Moral Law is required justifying Faith Repentance and our Sacraments be commanded in the second Commandment 13. The Moral Law containeth more then the Law of Nature 14. Good works are necessary to Salvation in regard of the presence of them 15. Our holy duties have a promise of pardon and eternal life not because of their worth but yet of their presence 16. To every godly action thou dost there is a promise of eternal life 17. Goods works be conditions without which a man cannot be saved 18. Good works are in their owne nature a defence against sin and corruption 19. Our good works be a motive moving God as a King that preferreth one that saluteth him 20. The State of reparation cannot be absolutely said to be better then that in innocency 21. We are not by Christ more righteous then Adam was or imputed righteousness though infinite in Christ is only imputed to us for that we lost and ought to have and we need no more 22. The Gospel makes known Christ and then the Law thus as it were illightned by the Gospel doth fasten a command upon us to believe in Christ Mr. Rutherf 23. Gods decree of grace in the execution of it may be broken in a linke by some great sin but Christ cannot but soder the chain and raise the fallen sinner 24. The Law hath power to convert by the Spirit 25. Sinners remaining in that damnable state are not to believe but as thus qualified that is humbled wearied self-condemned onely 26. Yet though thou were upon the borders of hell the Gospel excepts thee not from the duty of believing and coming to Christ They that sin against the holy Ghost are condemned for unbelief 27. Saving humiliation is conjoyned with Christ Dr. Tayeler A man may get from under his dangerous state by the attaining and exercise of three saving Graces Faith Repentance and inchoate obedience Repentance wipes off old scores repealeth all the actions of the Law getteth all sins cast into the bottom of the Sea Inchoate obedience hath promise of acceptance and is accounted as full and compleat obedience to the Law The way to escape the yoke and coaction of the Law is to become a cheerful and free observer of it That these are not of the substance of the Law but circumstances appendce and consequences viz. 1. That the Law yoaketh every man to a personal performance of it 2. To exact personal and perfect obedience upon pain of eternal death 3. To urge and force it self upon the conscience with fear and terror 4. That no life or salvation must be expected by the Law but by keeping it wholly and exactly 5. That the Law arraignes and condemnes the sinner and is the Ministery of death Without the law no man can know what God is nor his worship nor how to perform duties Good works be conditions of blessedness Mr. Bedford Christ hath freed us provided that men by faith lay hold on Christ keep close to him and walk according to those rules of holiness that he hath prescribed for in so doing we obtain what the Law promised life and salvation Believers are not under that condition of full and perfect obedience but under a condition of sincerity of obedience The Law as circumstantial viz. as it is a covenant of life and death is abolishod Mr. Bl. in serm Christ came to save none but holy ones Setting up of Familiy-duties like the sprinkling of the blood of the Paschal lamb will keep out the destroying Angel Mr. All. sem As Christ was glorified because he first glorified his Father so we must first glorifie God by our obedience and serve him if we will be saved There is a general equity that if God save any he save them that serve him To be glorified of God is to be received into communion have acceptance peace of conscience joy in the holy Ghost Adoption and the inheritance these we shall have by honouring and serving of God here so that by honouring God we do good to our selves Mr. No. The law is the word of Grace that bringeth salvation Grace cometh by the Law as well as by Gospel And so expounded those Texts Tit. 2.11 2 Cor. 6.1 Act 20.32 Mr. H. God made man for happiness and the Law must be his rule and guide unto it The Covenant of Grace is not absolute and free but upon condition of our good works or works are considerations or Causa sine qua non as when a great treasure is promised for going a hundred miles The Covenant of works requireth perfect obedience and the condition of the covenant of Grace is at least a purpose and endeavour to keep the Commandments The Lord give us a good understanding in all things and make us rightly to discern between things that differ To God belongeth glory for ever Amen FINIS Monomachia OR A Single REPLY To Mr. RUTHERFORD'S Book CALLED Christ's dying and drawing of Sinners Vindicating and clearing onely such Positions and Passages in The Assertion of Grace as are palpably mistaken and perverted and so mis-called ANTINOMIAN Wherein also it appeareth that the Adversaries dealing is neither just nor candid By Robert Towne Luke 6.22 23. Blessed are ye when men hate you and when they separate you and revile you and cast out your name as evil for the Son of man's sake Rejoyce ye in that day c. for after this manner their fathers did to the Prophets Joh. 9 39. And Jesus said For judgement I am come into this world that they which see not might see and they which see might be made blinde James 3.14 15. If ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts glory not and lye not against the Truth This wisdom descendeth not from above c. Qui aliorum verba calumniantur illi arte alium fingunt ac formant sermonem quà m ab co quem calumniantur est dictus Moll Jac. 3.14 Aemulationem dixit amaram quia non regnat nisi dum veneno malignitatis infecti sunt ut omnia in amarulentiam
distinguished as Mark 1.15 Repent and believe the Gospel 2. I do not make repentance and to mortifie sin all one as I there speak of repentance 3. Neither say I that to repent and to mortifie sinne is by faith to flye to grace embrace Christ c. The Law is against you as a false witness in all these And you cannot but perceive that I speak of that legal repentance and mortification which you with others so much stand for as requisite before faith Which is when a man is so laid open to himself so effectually convinced and wrought upon by the Law that he seeth acknowledgeth and renounceth all things in him and done by him as sinne and abomination before the Lord whatever esteem he hath had of them formerly or whatever shew they may make Yea and as sinne the sting of death appears and reviveth in all which is the very mortification the wounding and killing of the soul Rom. 7.10 so all these seeming excellencies and good things become mortified within him and his heart that lived and rejoyced in them now dyeth unto them finding nothing but vanity sin and death in all things out of Christ Thus he repenteth and changeth his mind with shame and sorrow that ever he so exalted and established his own righteousness of works as did Paul and those zealous Jews being converted to the faith And because we are necessitated to carry this body of death to the grave and therefore sin and death will ever and unavoidably be in us and all our works and we can by faith in Christ alone finde true righteousness life peace confidence joy and salvation hence Christ is our onely treasure who hath our hearts delight and all else are renounced and accounted as dung and dross Phil. 3.9 You neither may nor can rightly understand my words as spoken of that Evangelical repentance or mortifying of sin in life and conversation by the Spirit of which we read Rom. 8.13 Colos 3.5 Also you know that both in the Scriptures and Authors repentance is somtimes taken largely as comprehending faith also with the effects and fruits of it and so it is divided into mortification and vivification But fince all fulness is in Christ who is made unto us wisdom righteousness sanctification and redemption that all our rejoycing should be in him he that liveth by faith in him is the onely mortified man Psal 73.25 Whom have I in heaven but thee and there is none upon earth desired besides him Mr. Rutherf pag. 273. There be two things in the Law 1. The authority and power to command 2. To punish pag. 275. It s most false that Mr. T. saith To justifie and condemn are as proper and essential to the Law as to command 3. It s false that we are freed from active obedience to the moral Law because Christ came under the active obedience for law requires obedience out of love Reply These two authorities of the Law are repeated and inculcated by you and Mr. Burg. usque ad nanseam Dictator-like you still say It 's false it 's most false c. but where is there any truth or weight in what you say against me I can contemn your vain and reproachfull words and do account your self-coined distinctions as windy without warrant and weight You have a satisfactory answer in my former Reply I may challenge you to produce one syllable for a Law commanding without its condemning power Remember Matth. 5.17 18. 2. That the Law requires obedience out of love its true but we worke from self-love and for self-ends viz. that we may live thereby and not dye The first Adam by his obedience might have preserved himself in that life and state of holiness and happiness he had by creation but now in Christ our life and and felicity is attained and kept by faith we believe that we may live And we love and obey freely for no such ends as not standing and falling by our obedience or disobedience moral Also if our love be changed from legal into evangelical void of selfness Yet that altereth not the cords of the law nor the chaines we were in but Christ hath happily freed us from them The change is in the true Christian and in his estate but you can shew no change in the Law Neither do we destroy the Law as you slander us again but do establish it by faith Rom. 3.31 Where I see that Paul preached the same way that we do in that he was so put to clear and vindicate his Ministery as you do us This also will serve for that exception in pag. 275. where you set the same Coleworts before your Reader It is your constant doctrine that works have reward here and eternall life hereafter and that they be conditions and the way to life and glory how this will consist with faith and Christ let all judge Mr. Rutherf pag. 332. Town in Assertion pag. 56 58. A believer is as well saved already as justified by Christ and in him Divines say Our life and salvation is inchoate but they speak of life as it is in us subjectâ—è Quantum ad nos spectat or in respect of our sense and apprehension here in grace our faith knowledge sanctification is imperfect but in regard of imputation and douation our righteousness is perfect and he that believeth hath life not he shall have it or hath it in hope onely Answ If we have glory really actually perfectly but want it onely in sense we have the resurrection from the dead also actually we want nothing of the reality of heavrn but sense but we are not yet before the throne Therefore holy walking can be no way nor condition nor means of salvation c. therefore no wonder they reject all sanctification as not necessary and teach men to loose the reynes to all fleshly walking Reply Justification puts the soul into a present state of salvation The Scriptures are plain He hath saved us 2 Tim. 1.9 Tit. 3.5 Eph. 2.8 and These things have I written unto you that believe c. that ye may know that ye have eternal life 1 Joh. 5.13 This is the record that God hath given to us eternal life and this life is in his Son ver 11. and Ephes 2.5 God hath quickned us together with Christ and hath raised us up together and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus I muse you stumble in so clear light Hence saith Musculus Before God we are all that which he willed and also hath caused us to be Christ is not alone in his eyes but we also are conjoyned to him The Assertion doth present you with testimonyes sufficient you believe so farre as you see and feel If you deny our perfection in Christ our head In whom we are compleat Col. 2.10 deny also our union with him that we have received him have him are now the Sons of God 1 Joh. 3.2 Yea then deny that God hath given us as yet
their actions else perfection should be in us and no need of justification if we sin not What gaine you by this you say by justification there is no removal of sin but of the guilt or obligation to eternal wrath c. But the Scripture speaketh not of guilt nor obligation to punishment but of sin and the debt it self whereof we being discharged the obligation to the curse ceaseth upon that yet we may be discharged in our accounts with God of sin and it be still dwelling in us and we confess it too Now what flashly divinity is this nay is not your doctrine truely fleshly for it is self-liking and from a carnal principle That our good works are conditions of life and salvation And that Christ saveth from eternal wrath but we must suffer temporary punishment here we may sin and the law not curse us c. hence is your doctrine so currant and acceptable to all carnal mindes M. Rutherf pag. 572. Towne by the word Law Rom. 6. I understand saith he Moral law with all its Authority Answ If we be freed from all authority of the law then hath the sixth command no authority from God to teach that murder is a sin that Idolatry is agaainst the second commandment Reply By like consequence it may be said If there be no curse nor condemnation in the law we live under as you teach us then the sixth Commandment cannot curse or condemn for murder c. Your Argument holdeth not what the law saith it is to them that are under it The law may have power though you in a true sense be not under it So the Law teacheth what sin is and what curse is annext to sin though you agree with the prophane and secure in heart who in their imaginations deceitfully separate sin and the curse as they would sin without peril M. Rutherf Then the Believer when he lyes whores c. is not obliged to know and see from the light of the law that these be sins Reply In like manner by your doctrine he is to see no condemnation nor danger by the Law for these sins but may live and continue secretly in sinning for the Law to him hath no condemning power deliver your self and acquit me M. Rutherf Mark saith T. Three grounds of mistake 1. That justification and sanctification are separable 2. To ease men by faith of the yoke of the law is to suffer them to run after the course of the world 3. That all strict conformity to the law is right sanctification Answ 1. Not any of these is owned by Protestant Divines they are all in Mr. T. forged calumnies Reply I hate forging and wish you used it no more then I you finde not me charging Protestant Divines with these but whether Mr. Burgess with the President and fellows of Sion Colledge who unanimously justifie and commend to the whole Kingdome his Sermons and Doctrine and Dr. Taylor whom your self so much defend be Protestant Divines I leave that to your thoughts For 1. Mr. Burgess saith expresly That the Law is used as an effectual instrument of Sanctification Regeneration and Conversion And D. Taylor saith If a man be freed from the Law he may whore steal c. as if there were no power in the word of Grace and spirit to renew guide and keep us in the good wayes of God And to the third I say If hundreds teach not so then I am mistaken Who is now the forger of Calumnies whether they owne them or no. I avow them as I say Yet you say we never make the Law the efficient instrument of sanctification and you know it is otherwise They for whom you so plead and against whom for that cause we except have taught and published as I say Mr. Rutherf I cannot see that sanctification is any thing by Antinomian Doctrine but meer justification Reply You want eye-salve or will not see how often may you read them distinguished in the Assertion Mr. Rutherf Mr. T. passes by all guidance of the Saints by Commandment of Law or Gospel and tells us of a leading by a free Spirit onely So that by the Antinomian doctrine we are no more under the Gospel as a directing and Commanding rule then under law What hindereth then but Antinomian justification bids live as we list 2. A dead letter forbids no sin commands no duty but the Gospel without the Spirit is a dead letter as well as Law Reply 1. Is Mr. Rutherf guilty of denying all truths he never mentioneth but 2. The Assertion telleth you of a sanctifying vertue and power of the Spirit by the Gospel to subdue sin change the heart and freely dispose it to walk according to the rule of the Law this you read And under this dominion and guidance of this Evangelical spirit of Christ are all the Sons of God Rom. 8.18 What an indirect and undue inference then do you make saying We teach men to live as they lift First there is a change in their list and will from what they were The Spirit lusteth against the flesh Gal. 5. And 2. I tell you If this Spirit have not soveraignty over you and power to renew and guide you you will neither follow the rule of Law nor Gospel The unction leadeth into all truth You call the Gospel a dead Letter It s no Scripture-phrase which saith it s the ministration of the spirit 2 Cor. 3.8 yet it makes not against me at all Mr. Rutherf If by conformity to the law in the letter Mr. T. means external obedience without faith in Christ He knows Protestant Divines acknowledge no sound sanctification but that which is the natural issue and fruit of justification and flows from faith And such strict conformity to the law we hold to be true sanctification though all enemies to holy walking cry out against it such as are all mockers of all religion the Prelatical and Antinomian party who mock strait walking Reply Bona verba quaeso But 1. I know Protestant Divines hold sanctification to issue out of justifying faith and you cannot but know many who deny it and that some will have sanctification to be coetaneous unto yea to precede justification 2. If it be the issue and fruit of faith by which the heart believeth first to justification and salvation how is it that you teach strict conformity to be a necessary condition mean or way of salvation which by faith is attained in order before holy walking He that believeth is saved Abraham did believe and work both but he did onely by faith come to blessedness and so all his children Gal. 3.9 2. You are ill-transported when in your distemper you conjoyn us with the Prelatical party though I doubt not but amongst them were divers as sound for doctrine and life as in your party and make us both mockers and enemies to holy walking Sir doth the Law now regulate you when you are so far from charity and truth The Lord forgive and
grant you repentance Amen Mr. Rutherf pag. 575. There is a twofold keeping in of sinners one meerly legal they care not for Mr. T. Gaole Reply The law is not my Gaole but Gods and both they and you may be made to minde it more then either yet doth you speak too contemptibly Mr. Rutherf Mr. T. will have the believer so free so perfect as the law needs not to teach nor direct him in one stop he doth all without a keeper by the free compulsion of a Spirit separated from Scriptures which is right down A believer is neither under law nor Gospel but a Spirit separated from both guides him Reply When I say the Spirit of the Lord is his keeper do I teach then he hath no keeper 2. He receiveth the Spirit that leads him by the Gospel how false then is your charge who speak or dream of a spirit separated from Gospel and not I. And yet the Spirit breatheth and bloweth in the heart and the voice or sound of it is there heard when there is no sillable of outward Law or Gospel but you have sufficient answer before As for your instances of Joseph and David I ask of you whether it was the Spirit within that kept them from offending or the law T. pag. 5 6. I muse you omit to shew what it is to be under Grace Mr. Rutherf Dr. Taylor did not omit to shew what it is if you did not omit to read his words he is clear to any Reply Before you complained you could not see what was plain before you but now you can see what is not extant this is the fruit of partiality Mr. Rutherf But let your exposition stand you are not under the law as teaching directing regulating believers in the way of righteousness but the Gospel giveth power to subdue sin without any teaching or regulating power of the law But what is the power of subduing sin to the Antinomians not sanctification but justification that is a power to believe that Christ hath obeyed law for me we are obliged to no personal sanctification c. then to be inherently holy is unlawful to Antinomians Reply The exposition is not mine verbatim yet even in your owne expression the light of truth is so clear and convincing on our part that you turn your back on it as afraid to meddle And being disposed to take occasion to wrangle you demand what it is to subdue sin whereas it is set before you even the weakening of the power of sin within us that it domineer not over us Indeed the Prophet Micah 7.19 useth the phrase of subduing by justification and that is a true subduing it in the conscience that it there raign not to death condemnation And yet by your confession this must precede and is the proper cause of subduing it in conversation and then that will necessarily follow issuing out of this faith So that in fine this is but a Papistical cavil That to teach justification is the overthrow of holiness and good works Lastly whereas you tell of obliging to sanctification I answer we are to believe that God will sanctifie us and that throughout and put his Spirit into us to lead us in his wayes and so in that faith desiring and hungering after it to seek to him as a sick man longing for health unto his Physitian and to wait in the use of his ordinances that he may so perform The new Covenant properly requireth nothing of man but God knowing his spiritual poverty and utter disability calleth upon him to seek to him who worketh both the will and the deed of his owne pleasure Open thy mouth and I will fill it Psal 81. Your slanderous conclusion is both against the rule of Gods law and of all humane arts But such extravagancy becometh or still pleaseth Mr. Rutherford T. Assert pag. 6. I deny not the law to be an eternal and inviolable rule of righteousness yet the Grace of the Gospel doth truly and effectually conform us unto it Mr. Rutherf pag. 578. I ask to whom the law is a rule if to Believers then they must be under it 2. That rule the grace conformeth unto we must be under 3. An inviolable rule of justice cannot be violated without sin Then the Believer cannot violate the law and murder but they must sin and violate the rule c. Reply It s true the law is an inviolable rule but not to him as a Believer or in the things of his Faith but here he departs from it for he doth not the Law to be saved but believeth after the rule of the Gospel 2. If you consider him morally I see not but he may be conformed to the rule of the law and yet not under it but under grace and the rule of the spirit which conformeth him 3. In this your moral or civil conception of him you take him quite out of Christs kingdom where grace reigneth And now grant he doth murder and sin It is death and condemnation by the same rule and law so that he must be totally removed out of the limits of the law before he can be freed and secured from either sin or death You leave faith and fall from grace in all your arguments And they are as forcible to maintain the condemning power of the law to believers as the regulating for where the law regulates it may condemn and so it doth the best Saint here if you bring him and his life under it T. Assert pag. 7. Through faith is bred assured confidence lively hope c. M. Rutherf pag. 579. This is a close perverting of the word of truth the Antinomians faith may here be smelt then whoever once wavereth or doubteth are yet under the law of works A doctrine of despair to broken reeds who cry I believe help my unbelief Reply I must commend to you Jam. 1.6 7. But observe good Reader what is here excepted against viz. Through Faith in Christ is bred assured confidence lively hope pure love towards God invocation of his name without wavering fear or doubting not questioning his good will audience acceptance which would never be effected by all the zeal and conscience towards God according to the law of works And now judge impartially what truth can be current with Mr. Rutherf I aske 1. can assured confidence lively hope c. come or be effected any way else then by faith in Christ If there want light at Noon-day Read Heb. 3.9 where your Bible-Note saith That he calleth that excellent effect of faith whereby we cry Abba Father confidence and to confidence he joyneth hope which is termed a lively hope that God begets unto 1 Pet. 1.3 see also Heb. 10.22 23. Rom. 15.13 and 10.14 How shall they call on him on whom they have not believed But it is like this moveth M. Rutherf that it is said that these cannot be attained by all the zeal according to the law of works yet Paul clears it Eph. 2.18 That
through Christ we have entrance unto the Father and Eph. 3.12 By him we have boldness and entrance with confidence by faith in him If Mr. Rutherf object But these are not in full and absolute perfection where yet true faith may be Who saith so or who but Mr. Rutherf would so closely pervert the truth that I may retort his owne words Being justified by faith we have peace c. In whom believing ye rejoyce c. God hath begotten us againe to a lively hope c. Rom. 5.1 1 Pet. 1.3 8. Nay saith Mr. Rutherf This is a close perverting of the truth for he doubts not but that there are many weak believers of a trembling timerous and troubled spirit whose faith is not yet able to over-master their fears which cause torment and disquietness but I cease And Mr. Rutherf hereby smels our faith Reply Naribus utilis yet no unsavory errour And know it that it is the effect of the law of works upon the natural conscience and the unbelief of the Gospel that keep the soul in bondage through that slavish fear Mr. Rutherf ibid. The covenant of grace commands faith and also good works as witnesses of faith but Mr. T. will have good works in any Notion of an Evangelick command to stand at defiance with the covenant of grace Repl. What contend you for if you grant grace to be the fountain-cause of all holy walking then not the law 2. If it be a lively and free fountain then doth holiness issue out of it as a pleasant stream and how now do good works stand at defiance with the covenant of grace Besides it is said Catachrestiâ—â—s abusively and not properly that the covenant of grace commands faith and good works for it promiseth to give both to them who have power to neither Lastly these works are not done as conditions to obtain eternal life for that is said passim to be by faith without works faith for salvation good works for conversation Mr. Rutherf ibid. The man under the law cannot give himself to be ruled by the law after the minde and will of God as Mr. T. saith except Antinomians be Pelagians Reply It s a palpable wrong I have no such words as that a man under the law can give himself to be ruled by it after the mind and will of God you have a strange conscience that no better bridleth you though your affections be void of love to your Adversary I might more truely reply by your doctrine That a man under the law can do it for you free none from under it or else you are not ruled by it after the mind and will of God And that is most propable who now is the Pelagian But to deal plainly what say you of Paul and many zealous Jews who in earnest applied themselves to do the things of the Law so that Paul saith touching it he was blameless and that before his conversion to the faith To do it after the mind and will of God is your addition Mr. Rutherf Paul speaks of a man under the Law in the flesh and in opposition to that under Grace married to Christ he that is dead to the Law married to Christ and serves God spiritually And it 's clear the Apostle counts it a part of deliverance from the Law and a fruit of our marriage to Christ that we bring forth fruit to God walk holily and serve in newness of spirit Reply Jam convenimus What contend you for all is granted that I desire or said for 1. then Christ and not the Law as a husband makes fruitfull 2. Then there was a serving of God under the Law in the oldness of the letter 3. Where or how then find you me to be against holy walking and according to the rule of righteousness Is not this your false slander Assert How can Christ redeem us from the Law except in the same sense and extent that Christ was under it Mr. Rutherf 1. Christ was under the Law of Ceremonies I hope Gentiles were not under that Reply The question is of the moral and you talk vainly of ceremonial Mr. Rutherf If Christ was under the Law as a rule to free us from it why commands he to imitate him Reply Christ was under the Law for life even to obtaine favour and salvation for us so he is in the end of the Law for righteousness to all that believe 2. It is by his spirit and power any imitate him walking as he did and so do keep the Law as he did freely in love not for self-life or self-ends for so did Christ who sought not himself Assert pag. Mr. T. hath a strange evasion The spirit is free why will you controle and rule it by the Law whereas the nature of it is freely to conforme heart and life to the outward rule of the law without the help of the law as a crooked thing is made straight c. Mr. Rutherf To do the will of God meerly as commanded from the power of an outward commandment is legal saith Saltmatsh and Mr. T. saith it is to controul the free spirit Three means saith T. are passive to hear read receive Sacraments are so many restraints laid on the free spirit Reply I say again If the spirit rule you according to the Law then neither Law nor you do rule it but the Law is onely the rule or pattern according to which the Spirit formeth you What can be more plain to him that will see and grant any truth And this makes no contrariety but a sweet harmony between the word and the spirit yea and establisheth the Law by the faith and Spirit of the Gospel And here you would range us among the old Anabaptists Enthusiasts c. and love to expatiate having burst the banks and bounds of charity and truth I am not more strange to you then this is to me That you are of such a spirit 2. Where say I that meanes are passive The Spirit is pleased to blow sweetly by all Evangelical meanes as Preaching Prayer Sacraments c. and we rightly using them do carry our selves passively that the Spirit may thereby breath and give life to our Spirits and that we may have it more abundantly Mr. Rutherf What T. meaneth in saying The spirit freely conformeth the heart to it Reply The sense is easie and plain if your mind were not finister Mr. Rutherf If the meaning be that the Law of it self cannot convert a man to God Antinomians father most falsly such dreames on us but if the Spirit conform us to the outward rule of the Law then must the Law be yet a rule to our obedience Reply When you please you can spell out my meaning But 1. Whether it be your dream or no I leave it Yet you know that your Brethren so hold and teach and may be forced to own this brat or novell-assertion of theirs 2. As if Mr. Rutherf were in a dream he in his other book would seem
all his so that I see not how you can make his Elect singly and simply to be any partys in undertaking and promising any thing You say Dr. Cr. giveth this reason why it is not on condition of our believing because man may fail in believing and so the condition failing Covenant faileth Reply His reason is good and sound for of it selfe faith is failing else Christ needed not to have prayed that Peters faith might not fail Luke 22.32 But all the whole Covenant being grounded on Christ as the foundation it is established on a firm Rock and so is everlasting Mr. Rutherf They object that God promiseth all as to give faith to put Law in the inward parts to cause to walk in his waies as Jer. 31. Ezek. 36.26 27. To circumcise our hearts Deut. 30.6 which the Arminians deny yet is the clear day-light of Scripture so that all lyeth on God Reply But you return not one syllable of a direct and satisfactory answer unto it you cannot deny but what God promiseth he is faithful to perform and do it You inferre some indirect and undue consequences as if you would rather wrangle against the truth which you cannot resist or were offended that it shineth forth so gloriously and convincingly in your face What if Dogs abuse it and Pharisaical Spirits otherwise principled spurne against it or mis-construe it as occasioning Libertinisme the sin be theirs yet this is the onely right ground and reason of prayer and using all Gods Ordinances in which the soul carrying it self passively waiteth that God may communicate and pour out his blessings according to his word Because God had promised first and that freely the building of Davids house and the King saw thereby that God had a gracious mind and purpose to do it and that it should be his act therefore David prayed that the Lord would bless his house that it might continue for ever before God For thou O Lord hast spoken it 2 Sam. 7.27 28 29. If all fulness be in the fountain and free access may be had it standing open to all It is an effectual invitation to come As for those opinions bred and breathed in New-England I know nothing of them neither am I so credulous or uncharitable towards any as to receive whatever an Adversary reporteth for if the liquor be never so pretious and pure yet if it come out of a fusty and tainted vessel it will taste of the Caske I see none of you so candid but in some things you wrong the Author in perverting his words or meaning even when it is printed and obvious to every eye But here you let all see that you cannot outwrangle the truth for at last you chide your self to agree and yeeld to it for 1 you say I grant God worketh the condition Then how is it mans condition or how can it be said to lye on him 2 Truth is say you It 's an unproper condition for the whole bargain is pure Grace Thus you are brought to grant all and no thanke to you for you would fain have it a condition still An unproper one must serve rather then none God indeed worketh orderly one thing after another the former as is said we may call a State-condition but not otherwise properly and without danger But ere you cease you tell us again of Libertinisme c. Reply Well receive the love of the truth and here shake hands and cast your stones against abusers of Free-grace if your side be not guilty of the like or worse You have a watchfull eye to look into our waies if in love to us we thanke you It might occasion us at least if we had any unfeigned desire that the good and fair way of the Lord might not be evil spoken of to walk more circumspectly but if the word of Grace leaven not the heart it will abide graceless And I rest perswaded that if it had not been either the licentious or loose life of some who are noted or because such as had been formerly wicked and prophane did flock after Dr. Crisp and attend to his Ministery as they did in Luke 15.1 2. and that it was more glorious and effectual then others else that you and your fellows would never have used tongue or pen against this way My reason is because it is so clear and undenyable that having searched and sifted it with all diligence there is found no solid and material cause of exception against it but all is resolved into envy and prejudice As for that question of justification before faith or after I have spoken to it in answer to Mr. Burgess It 's true God in his Gospels-dispensation onely pronounceth the sentence of absolution to the believer for he dealeth in it with men of actual understanding and the main end is to quiet and comfort the conscience for which purpose faith is mainly useful as to give glory unto God But you grant that the Covenant is with Christ and all his Heirs and kindred in him he being a publique person in whom all were acquitted and that is sufficient 4 Exception in pag. 102. Mr. Rutherf Can we saith Mr. Towne separate the directing or commanding power of the Law from the condemning power Is it a Law and hath no power to condemn Answ Actual condemnation may be separated as a Lyon is a Lyon though chained that he cannot actually devour it could not condemn Adam before sinne c. Christ hath removed the curse Reply The question is whether the Lyon be a devouring beast and you answer He cannot actually devour because he is chained but doth chaining change his devouring nature and so hath not the Law a condemning power still though it condemn not actually alway you see power to do it is not taken from it That it did not condemn Adam in innocency hath no more sinew of Argument in it then that the Law of the Land hath no power to condemn murther because there is no actual murtherer It hath power to do it but it is to exercise and put forth its power in a way of justice that is when the sinne is actually committed You say but they are vain words without light or weight that to condemn is accidental to a Law I reply as truely and in the like sense That to command and direct be as accidental so the whole of the Law in all its parts and offices shall be accidental for the Law doth not actually rule and govern Lawless rebels may not I then as solidly inferre It hath no authority nor power to do it yea in Hell among the damned as in our prisons there is Law onely actually condemning and tormenting but not ruling and directing in its way of holiness Lastly You should prove that Christ hath removed the curse from the Law he hath redeemed his from under it but left the Law with all the power it had But you speak what Mr. Burgess objected also If need be see more in Answer to
of the law and need no more make use of justification nor have Christ for our shadow and protection Mr. Rutherf p. 591. That the Saints are meer patients and blocks in all their holy walking is gross libertinisme Reply But how unjustly do you charge this upon your Adversary who saith onely in the act of sanctification in which the Spirit onely acteth Is not this to pervert what is spoken M. Rutherf No way cryeth to the conscience of the traveller This is the way as the law doth in its directing and ruling power c. Reply The law materially is resembled to the high-way and its true the high-way calleth not to the passenger to keep his way yet the authority of the King doth so call and require so then it is not the law as we consider it and speak of it but God the Author of the law who commandeth to walk in it And if God in so doing convince you of unrighteousness for your going astray Is not his grace in the Gospel your dayly needful refuge and plea or you still are in no danger nor fear because law cannot condemn for God say you is pleased with what the poor man can do or give Thus you live under a law securely which is as weak as your self and will be content with with any thing as you list or can obey Whereas I on the other side say that the law hath lost no power nor part of its perfection Matth. 5.17 18. And therefore it convinceth all of sin and condemneth such as are found under it because in many things we sin all In our best works we are found faulty and judged that we may finde no rest nor safety but in the righteousness of Christ by faith Let the Reader judge who is in the errour But it is no marvel you so mis-call mistake pervert your Adversary and falsly accuse him as you do passion and yet have no check of conscience for it seeing you are so principled that you may transgress and do any thing impure that is Scot-free by your law and are not led by a right-Gospel-Spirit Town pag. 10. The law wrappeth every man in sin for the least transgression Mr. Rutherf pag. 593. Still Antinomians bewray their engine If me say being justified we have no sin we lye 1 John 1.10 then there cannot be a man nyon the earth but he is under the curse of God Antinomians say the justified are freed from the curse then they have no sinne nay they cannot sinne by their Argument for they will have the curse essentially and inseparably to follow sinne which is most false Reply 1. If we be justified from the curse then from the sin which yet we have remaining in us Coram judieio Dei for the cause is taken away before the effect 2. Else by the contrary Christ is not our righteousness in justification which is opposed to sin but onely our blessedness in stead of the curse that was upon us how then is it said he brought in everlasting righteousness Dan. 9.24 And that we are made the righteousness of God in him 2 Cor. 5.21 So there is no man indeed but he is under the curse if the blood of Christ have not washed him from his sinne as Rev. 1.5 He hath loved us and washed us from our sinne 3. In order justification is after sinne and it being extensive to all sinnes past present and to come it must presuppose future sinnes also as done before it abolish either sinne or curse due for sinne 4. You say It s most false that sinne and the curse be inseparable but you neither prove nor can shew any thing to the contrary Indeed a carnally secure heart is apt to separate them and is thereby hardened presuming to sinne without danger or fear Deut 29.19 If you allow of his engine as better suiting with your own you may well mislike ours 5. Here you tell us of an unscripture-like and ungrounded distinction of a twofold misery and guilt and so of deliverance c. But I confess I understand not your meaning and would be loth to mistake or pervert you as you do me Your Simile giveth me most light viz. That as the rising of the Sun is the way to the full noon-day c. I answer but so it is no act of ours but of the Spirit sanctifying us throughout till we be perfected in our selves and so it is not simply our repentance and new-obedience which are consequences effects and expressions of that renovation or sanctification And I demand also Is not that blot it self so taken away ut non imputetur as not reckoned to us by the death of Christ though it abide physically or inherently yet in our accounts it is abolished and blotted out Lastly I must that you will except against that expression in Assert pag. 15. The Law of workes is so inwrapt and entwined together that if a man lay hold on any even the least link he inevitably pulleth the whole chaine upon himself And yet what you say is of no force Your repentance and love of brethren if you understand your self do pull the whole Law upon you as they be your acts You cannot oblige your self in part and in some degrees onely as you please Wo to that life most commendably passed over if the grace of the Gospel be not to pardon all imperfections All our righteousnesses are as filthy ragges Isa 64.6 Therefore durst not Paul be found in his own righteousness Phil. 3.9 Mr. Rutherf pag. 595. Our obedience is not full and perfect onely it 's so counted and accepted in Christ Reply If this were all your meaning that our obedience or works as proceeding from us or as we perform them are imperfect yet are accepted as perfect in Christ I could receive it But you explain your self otherwise 1. You say It is not so and yet it is accounted perfec doth not God account it rightly as it is 2. You are against all sound Protestant Divines if you hold of acceptance with God of any work because of any proper formal inherent dignity in it or if you do not make Christ the alone ground reason and cause of all acceptance whether of persons or performances 3. It is true God accounts not us non-sinners in our selves and free from all indwelling sinne for that were an untruth but he both justifieth us by faith in Christ and makes us pure and free from all spot of sinne before his Judgement seat Col. 1.22 1 Joh. 1.7 The blood of Jesus cleanseth us from all sinne Now you are pleased to expatiate and to amplifie your self needlesly and wilfully to wrest our words as if â— we did not hold the good works of the regenerate to be faulty in themselves 2 As if we meant by the removal as you call it or abolition of finne such an annihilation of sinne in its essence root and branch that it should not dwell in us here whereas you know and read the