that we be iustifyed by the lawe Thaduersaries be deceiued because in this hole coÌ„trouersarie they haue respecte only to the lawe For humane reason can none otherwise iudge but that iustificacion is to be sought for in the lawe because the obedience towarde the lawe is iustice But the Euangel calleth vs away from the lawe to the promises and teacheth that we be reputed iuste nat for the obedience of the lawe for we satisfye nat the lawe but because that reconciliacion is gyuen vnto vs for Christ whiche we only receyue by fayth wherfore before we do the law we must by fayth receyue remission of synnes and reconciliacion O Lorde god with what face dare these men name Christe with what countenaunce dare they beholde the EuaÌ„gell which deny that we obtayne remissioÌ„ of siÌ„nes for Christe by only fayth SecoÌ„dly this selfe fulfyllyng of the lawe whiche foloweth renouacion is both smal and vnclene For though renouacion be attempted sumwhat begunne yet the dregges of synne stycke styl in nature alway accusyng vs onles by fayth in Christe we obtayne remission of synnes knowe that we haue a cummynge to god nat for our owne fulfyllyng of the lawe but for Christe Therfore that fulfyllyng of the lawe is nat accepted for it selfe but for faythe Wherfore when Paule sayeth that the lawe is stablyshed by fayth nat only this must be vnderstaÌ„de that they which be regenerate by fayth do conceyue the holy ghoste and haue mocions consentyng to the lawe of god but moste of all it is requysite to adde this that we owe to thynke that we be farre from the perfectioÌ„ of the lawe Wherfore we may nat affyrme that before god we be reputed iust for our owne fulfyllyng of the lawe but we muste thynke that we be recouÌ„pted iust or acceptable for Christe and nat for the lawe or for our workes and that this imperfecte or inchoate fulfyllyng of the lawe pleaseth god because we be in Christe and also that for the fayth in Christ the lackyng of fulfyllyng the lawe is nat imputed vnto vs. Thys teacheth Paule saying Christe redemed vs frome the malediction of the lawe beyng made for vs a curse that is to saye the lawe condempneth all men But Christe because he voyde of synne susteined the penaltie of synne and was made an hoste for vs he toke away the rigorous power of the lawe so that it shall nat accuse nor coÌ„deÌ„pne the beleuers in him for he is our propiciacion for whiche we be nowe accoÌ„pted ryghtwise In lyke seÌ„tence he wryteth to the Colossenses In Christe ye be consummate or perfyte as who shuld say although ye be yet farre from the perfeccion of the lawe yet the dregges or leauynges of synnes do nat condempne you because ye haue for Christ a certayne and ferme reconciliacion so that ye beleue natwithstandyng that synne stycketh styl in the fleshe For the death and the satisfaccioÌ„ of Christe gyuen for vs ought to be set farre aboue the very lawe to th ende that we may be assured that through the satysfaccyon we haue god mercifull vnto vs and nat for our fulfyllyng of the lawe wycked is that truste whiche is put in our fulfyllyng of the lawe But that trust is necessarie which is put in the satisfaccyon for Christe ☞ ⧠⧠☜ Thyrdly Only that thyng iustifieth before god whiche pacifieth the conscience For so longe as the conscience fleeth the iudgement of god and is angry with god we be nat ryght wyse nor viuifyed But only faythe pacifyeth the conscience accordynge to this of Paule Iustifyed by fayth we haue peace Also The ryghtwyse man shal lyue by fayth that is to say by fayth he veynquysheth the feares of death by faythe he is susteined and conceyueth ioye and lyfe And this bringeth fayth nat because it is a worthy worke of it selfe but onely because it reuiueth the offered promyse nothiÌ„g regardyng the owne propre worthynes Only therfore fayth iustifyeth and good workes do please by reason of fayth what can the aduersaries brynge agaynste thys reason what can they inuent agaynst the manifest trouth For the Minor is moste certayne that our workes can nat pacifye the conscience sythe god iudgeth and reproueth vs and sheweth vnto vs our vnclennes And that the scripture dothe oftentymes inculcate dryue into our hedes As the Psalme Non intres in iudicium cuâ— seruo tuo quia non iustificavitur in conspectu tuo 〈…〉 that is to say Enter nat into iudgement with thy seruaunt for no lyuyng creature shal be iustified in thy syght Here he quyte taketh away from all yea and from the saynctes and seruauntes of god the glorie of iustice if god dyd nat pardon but wolde iudge and detecte theyr hertê For where as in other places the Psalmist doth glorie of hys owne ryghtwysenes he speketh of his quarel or cause agaynst the persecutours of the worde of god and nat of hys personal clennes and he desyreth that the quarell and glorie of god may be defeÌ„ded As in the seuenth Psalme Iudica me domine secundum iusticiam meam c. i. Iudge me lorde accordyng to my ryghtwysnes And in another place Iudge O lorde my cause But on the other parte he teacheth that no man can susteyne the iudgemeÌ„t of god if he obserueth our synnes For thus he sayeth Si iniquitates obseruaueris domine domine quis sustinebiâ— If thou woldest marke o lorde the iniquities of men who can o lorde endure And Iob sayeth Vâ—rebar omnia opera mea .i. I feared all my workes Also if I were washed euen as it were with waters of snowe and my handes dyd shyne as moste pure cleane yet thou wylt embrewe me with fylthynes And Prouerb 20. Who can say my hert is cleane And .1 Ioan. 1. If we say that we haue nat synne we seduce our selues and trouth is nat in vs. Also in the Pater noster the holy men desyre remissioÌ„ of synnes â— holy men also haue synnes In the boke of Numer And the innocent shal be no innocent And Zacharie sayeth Silâ—at a facie domini omnis caro .i. Let euery man holde his tongue in the lordê preseÌ„ce And Esaye Euery fleshe is haye and all hys glorie is lyke a flower of the felde The haye wythereth vp and the floure fadeth because the spirite of the lorde hath bloweÌ„ in it that is to say the fleshe and the iustice of the fleshe caÌ„ nat abyde the iudgement of god And Ionas sayeth in the seconde chapiter In vayne they obserue vanities which leaue mercy .i. Al trust is voyde saue the truste of mercye Mercy saueth vs our owne merites our owne propre endeuours saue vs nat These and semblable sentencies in scriptures testifie that our workes be vncleane haue nede of mercie Wherfore workes do nat pacifie the conscience but mercie conceyued by faythe Fourthly Christe ceaseth nat to be a mediatour styll after that we be renewed For they erre which say that he
debeo accipere medicinam That is to saye because I alwayes syn I ought alwayes to take medycine Nowe for as moche as the Masse is suche a coÌ„municatioÌ„ of the sacrameÌ„t one comon Masse is kepte with vs euery holy day and also other dayes yf any desyer to vse the sacrament it is gyueÌ„ vnto them that asketh it And this maner is not newe in the Churche For the olde fathers before Gregorie speketh nothyng of the pryuate Masse but of the comoÌ„ Masse they speake verye moche Chrysostome sayeth that the preste stoÌ„deth dayly at the alter and some he dothe call to the receyuynge of the sacrament or communion and some he dothe kepe away And it appereth by the olde canons that some one preeste dyd celebrate the MasseÌ„ and of him al the other prestes deacons receyued the body of the lorde for so sounde the wordes of the Canon of Nicene whiche be these Accipiant diaconi secundum ordinem post presbyâ—eros ab episcopo vel a presbytero sacram coÌ„â—onem That is to say lette Deacons orderly after the preestes receyue the holy sacrament or communion of the byshope or of the preste And Paule spekynge of the communion coÌ„maundeth that one shulde tarie for another that there maye be made a comon participation For as moch thaÌ„ as the Masse with vs hath for it selfe the example of the Church taken out of scripture and of faâ—hers we truste it can not be improued namely sythe the common publyke ceremonies for the most part are kept lyke to the vsuall and accustomed ceremonies only the nomber of masses is vnlike which for great and manifeste abuses it were profytable at the lest way to moderate For in times passed masse was not done euery day no not in great congregatyons and where moch people assembled together as the historie tripertite dothe witnes in the .ix. boke the .xxxviij. chapiter in thys wyse Agayne iÌ„ Alexandria scriptures be redde vpon the wednesdaye and the friday and doctors do expoune them and al thinges are done without the solempne maner of the oblation ¶ Of confessyon COnfession iÌ„ the churches with vs is not done awaye for the body of the Lorde is not wonte to be delyuered to any but only to those that be examined and assoyled before and the people be very diligeÌ„tly taught of the faythe and assuraunce of absolution of whiche before this tyme was lytle mention or spekyng The people be taught to haue the absolution in greate price because it is the voyce of god and pronounced by the commaundemente of god The power of the keys is greatly made of by shewynge howe greate comforte it bryngeth to troubled coÌ„sciences that god requireth fayth to th ende that we shulde gyue credence to that absolution as to a voyce soundinge from heueÌ„ and that faythe in Christe getteth truly and receiueth remission of sinnes Before we dyd this satisfactions were ouer moche set vp and magnifyed but no speakynge there was of faythe and of the merite of Christe of ryghtuousnes of fayth Wherfore in this behalfe our churches be not to be blamed For our aduersaries be also coÌ„pelled to graunt this to vs that the doctrine of penaunce is intreated handled and opened of our lerned men moste diligently ⧠But of confessyon they teache that the rehersal and nombryng of sinnes is nat necessary and that consciences be not to be charged with care to nomber and teken vp all defaltes for it is impossible to reherse all defaltes as the prophete recordeth saynge who vnderstondeth all defaltes or sines Hieremie also sayth Prauum est cor hominis et inscrutabile The harâ—e of maÌ„ is frowarde and can not be searched That yf no synnes shulde be forgyuen but those that â—e rehersed consciences couldâ— neuer be quiete for many synnes they nether espye nor can â—â—â—ember Also olde wryters do wytnes thaâ— the nombrynge is not necessary 〈◊〉 in the deâ—rees Chrysostome is rehersed whiche sayeth thus Non tibi dico vt te prodas in publicum neque apud alios te accuses â–ª sed obedire te volo propheta 〈◊〉 Reuela ante deum viam tuaÌ„ Eâ—go tâ—a câ—â—fitere pâ—â—cata apud deuÌ„ vâ—â—uÌ„ iudicem cuÌ„ oratione Delicta tua pronuÌ„cta non lingua sed coÌ„scieÌ„tiae tuae me â—orta c. I say nat to the that thou shewe thy selfe opâ—nly nor that thou accuse thy selfe to other But I wyll that thou obeye the Propheâ—e sayenge Disclose thy way before god Wherfore confesse thy synnes to god the true iudge with prayer pronounce thyne offences not with thy tonge but with memory of thy conscience cÌ„ And the glose of penaunce distine 5. capi consideret doth confesse that confessyon is of mannes lawe but yet confessyon bothe for the greate benefyte of absolutyon and also for other vtilities and profettes of conscience is reteyned and kepte stylle amonge vs. ¶ Of diuersities of meates IT was a comen persuasion not onely of the vulgare people but also of the teachers in the Churches that diuersities of meates and lyke traditions of meÌ„ be profytable warkes to deserue remissyon of syn and of payne And that the worlde dyd so thiÌ„ke it appereth by that that newe ceremonies newe orders newe holy dayes newe fastynges were dayly instituted and teachers in temples did exacte and require these workes as a necessarie honour to the obteynynge of rightuousnes and they greatly did put in feare the sely consciences yf they shulde omitte and leue vndone any of these thynges Of this persuasion of traditions many myschiefes and inconueniencies ensued in the churche Fyrste of all the doctrine of grace and the ryghtuousnes of faythe was obscured and defaced whiche is the chief parte of the gospell and ought most of all to stonde forthe and to appere in the church to the entente that the meryte of Christ myght be wel knowen and that fayth which beleueth that sinnes be forgyuen for Christe and not for any of our workes myght be aduauÌ„ced and set vppe farre aboue workes Wherfore Paule also leaneth greatly to this part and remoueth and putteth awaye the lawe and traditions of men because he wold shewe that the christian rightuousnes is an other thynge then suche workes that is to wyt that it is faythe which beleueth that synnes be frely forgiuen for Christe But this doctrine of Paule is almoste all together oppressed by traditions which haue engendred and brought forthe an opinion that we muste neades meryte and get remission of sinnes and iustification by diuersitie of meates and lyke honorynge of god In penaunce there was no spekynge of faythe only these satisfactory workes were purposed and set forthe the hole penaunce appered to consyste and stonde in them Secundarely these tradityons haue obscured and darkened the preceptes of god because that traditions of men were preferred and regarded aboue the preceptes of god The hole christianitie was thought to be the obseruatyon and kepinge of certayne feries rytes fastinges
but a newe founde halydaye and a straunge sayeng euen in his tyme. So many wycked opinioÌ„s hang in vowes as that they deserue remission of synnes iustification that they be the christian perfection that they kepe the counselles and the coÌ„maundementes that they haue super fluiâ—e of good workes All these thynges syth they be false and coÌ„trary to Christes doctrine make vowes to be vayne and of none effecte Of the power of the churche GReate disputacions haue ben of the power of bisshoppes iÌ„ which many men haue confusely mengled togyther the power of the churche and the power of the swerde Of this confusion great batailles greate vnquietnes haue proceded whiles bysshoppes bâ—arynge themselues bolde vpon the power of the keys nat allouly haue institute and begonne newe honours of god nat only haue burdonned consciences with reseruation of cases and with violente excoÌ„munications and cursynges but also haue translated and remoâ—ed the kyngdomes of the worlde and gon aboute to take awaye thempire from themperours Well disposed and learned men haue reproued these vices in the churche longe sythen Therfore our preachers to thentente to conforte coÌ„sciences were constrayned to shewe the difference of the ecclesiasticall power and of the power of the swerde haue taughte that eyther of them because of goddes coÌ„maundement is to be had in greate reuerence and honoure as hyghe benefites of god vpon earthe And thus our lerned men thynke this is theyr opinion that the power of the keys or the power of bysshoppes accordyng to the gospell is a power or coÌ„maundemeÌ„t of god to preache the gospell to remitte and retayne lose and bynde synnes and to ministre sacramentes For with that coÌ„maundement Christe sendeth forthe his apostles sayeng as my father hathe sente me euen so I sende you Take the holy ghoste whose synnes ye remitte they be remitted whose synnes ye holde styll they be holden styll Also in the gospell of Marke he saythe Go preache the gospell to euery creature cÌ„ This power is put in execution only by teaching or preachyng the gospell and by ministryng the sacramentes eyther to a multitudeê or elles to one man by hym selue accordyng to his vocation and callyng for here be graunted nat corporall thynges but eternal thynges as eternal ryghtuousnes the holy ghoste eternall lyfe These thynges can nat chauÌ„ce or come but by ministration of the worde and of the sacramentes as Paule saythe The gospell is the power of god to saluation vnto all that beleue therfore sythe the power of the churche graunteth eternall thynges and is exercised only by ministration of the worde it lettith nat ciuile administracion Lyke as the crafte of singynge nothyng lettith ciuile or politicall administration for politicall administration gothe about other thynges then dothe the gospell For the gouernour or ruler defendeth nat myndes but bodies and bodely thynges agaynste manifeste iniuries and restreyneth men with the swerde and corporal paynes to thentente to kepe ciuile iustice and peace Therfore the power of the churche the ciuile power may nat be mixed and confounded together The power of the churche hathe his coÌ„maundemente to teache the gospell and to ministre the sacramentes Let it nat breake into anothers office let it nat translaâ—e altere the kyngdomes of the worlde as the byshops of Rome haue done let iâ— nat abrogate and defete lawes of princes let it nat take awaye due and laufull obedience of the subiecte to his prince let it nat interrupte iudgementeâ— of any ciuile ordenaunces or contractes let it nat prescribe ne appointe lawes to gouernours of the fourme and facion of the comon welthe as Christe saythe My kyngdome is nat of this worlde Also in an other place he sayth Quis me constituit iudicem aut diuisorem super vos that is to say Who made me iudge or deuider ouer you And Paule saith to the PhilippiaÌ„s Our policye or coÌ„uersation is in heuen And to the Corinthes The armure or wepons of our cheualry be nat carnall but mighty through god to destroy cogitacioÌ„s and thoughtes cÌ„ After this sorte do our men diuide they offices and dueties of bothe these powers and teache to honour them bothe and do acknowlege that eche of them is a gyfte benefite of god If byshops haue any power of the swerde that power haue they nat as bysshoppes by the coÌ„maundemeÌ„t of the gospel bu by mannes lawe gyuen to them of kynges and emperours to the ciuile ministration of theyr owne goodes So that this is another office thaÌ„ is the ministratioÌ„ of the gospel Therfore when soeuer question is made of the iurisdiction of byshopps the empyre and temporall power ought to be deuided and distincted from the ecclesiastical iurisdiction Undubtedly after the gospell and after goddes lawe no iurisdiction belongeth to byshoppes that is to saye to them to whom is coÌ„mitted the ministration of the worde and of the sacrameÌ„tes saue only this power to remitte and lose siÌ„nes and also to discerne and iudge doctrines and to reiecte a doctrine contrary to the gospel and to exclude and shytte out froÌ„ the coÌ„munion of the church wyckedmen whose wickednes is knowen and this muste be with the worde without mannes violence In these thynges the congregations or churches owe of dutie and be by the law of god bounden to submitte them selues and to shewe obedience accordyng to that sayeng of Christe who hearith you hearith me But when they teache or ordeyne any thynge agaynste the gospell then the congregations haue a coÌ„maundemente of god prohibitynge obedience As this beware of false prophetes and Paule to the Galathians If an aungell from heuen wolde preache or shewe any other gospell accursed be he Also to the Corinthes we can nothynge do agaynste the truthe but for the truthe Also in another place he sayeth Power is gyuen to vs for edification and nat for destruction So also do the canon lawes coÌ„maunde 2. D. 7. cap. Sacerdotes et cap. Oues And. S Austine against the epistle of Petilian sayeth If catholique by shoppes be deceiued any where by chaunce and thynke any thyng agaynst the canonical scriptures of god we ought nat to consent vnto theÌ„ If byshops haue any other power or iurisdictioÌ„ as in cognisauns of plee or in determinynge of certayne causes as of matrimony or of tythes they haue it by mans lawe wherin when the ordinaries fayle to do theyr dueties because eyther they wyll nat or can nat prynces be compelled yea whether they wyll or nat to see the lawe ministred to theyr subiectes for peace to be hodde amongest them Moreouer it is disputed whether byshops or pastours haue ryght and auctorite to ordeyne ceremonies in the churche and to make lawes of meatê of holy dayes and degrees of ministers or orders c. They that ymagin this auctorite to be in byshops alledge and bryng for them this testimonie and auctoritie of scripture Yet
ruinous churches and shortly to reduce them into a godly and perpetuall concorde Amen ⧠¶ The Apologie or defense of the confessyon of the prynces of Germany THe fyrste article of our confessyon our aduersaries do allowe in whiche we expowne that we beleue and teache one essencie diuine indiuisible cÌ„ and yet .iij distincte persones of the same essencie diuine and coeternall the father sonne and holy ghoste This article alwayes we haue taught and defeÌ„ded And we knowe that it hath certayne and ferme testimonies in holy scriptures which can nat be auoyded And constantly we affyrme that they whiche thynke otherwyse be out of the churche and ydolaters and do moste hyghe dishonour and slaunder to god ⧠⧠Of originall synne ⧠THe Seconde article of Originall synne the aduersaries do approue but so yet that they disproue our definicion of originall synne whiche we recited by the way Here forthwith euen in the very frount of the matter the emperours maiestie shall espye that the wryters of the confutacyon lacked nat only ryght iudgement but also indifferencye and gentylnes For where as we of a siÌ„ple mynde went about to recyte by the way the thynges that original siÌ„ne coÌ„teyned they by theyr croked maliciouse interpretacion do craftely depraue the sentence whiche of it selfe is trewe ynoughe For thus they argue To be without feare â— to be without â—aythe is actuall synne Ergo they denye originall synne ⧠It appereth suffyciently that this subtyle argumeÌ„t was broght forthe in scoles and nat in the counsell of Cesar. But albeit that this cauillacion may easely be auoyded yet that al good men may se that we teache none inconuenyence in thys behalfe we fyrste requyre that our coÌ„fession be harde which diligeÌ„tly marked shall delyuer vs from the suspicion of strauÌ„ge doctryne â–ª for there is it wrytten thus ⧠we do teache that after the falle of Adam euery man naturally borne is coÌ„ceiued in syn and so is borne that is that they al from the wombe of theyr mother be inclyned vnto euyl whiche can nat haue by nature the feare of god nor no trewe faythe in god ⧠This place witnesseth that we plucke from them whiche be borne accordyng to the carnal nature nat only actes but also the powers and gyftes of performyng drede and hope towardes god For we say that they whiche be thus borne haue concupiscence nor can nat perfourme the trewe feare and trust towardes god what can be here reproued Truly vnto good men we iudge that we be sufficiently purged For the latine description is of lyke sentence detractyng from nature the power that is to say the gyftes and strengthe of perfourmyng feare and truste towardes god detractyng also actes in persons of the age of dyscretion And when we name concupiscence we vnderstande nat only actes or frutes but a perpetuall inclinacyon of nature ⧠But here after we shal shewe with more wordes that our definition agreeth with the vsual and auncieÌ„t definition For fyrste we wyl open our intent why we vsed these wordes in thys place Our aduersaries them selues in scoles graunt that the materiall as they calle it of originall synne is concupiscence wherfore concupiscence was nat to be omytted in the definition namely in this tyme when many do descant of it so vngodly ⧠For sum of them dispute that original syn is nat any vice or corrupcion in the nature of man but only a bondage or a state of mortalitie whiche all the issue of Adam do susteyne without theyr owne proper vice for another mans gylte and offence More ouer they adde that noman is dampned to eternall deathe for synne originall and to this purpose they briÌ„g forthe a similitude of the Ciuile lawe saying thaâ— lyke as of a bondewoman the yssue is bonde and susteyne thys condycyon or state without the vice of nature onely for the calamytie of the mother so is it of Originall synne But we to shewe that this wycked opinion dothe displease vs haue made mencyon of concupisceÌ„ce namyng it a sore and disease and expounding that mannes nature is borne corrupte and viciouse ⧠Nor we haue nat only named it concupiscence but haue sayde that there dothe lacke also the feare of god faythe whiche we haue done for this entente The scole doctours do diminyshe and make lyte the synne originall â–ª nat sufficiently vnderstandyng the definicion of originall synne whiche they recyued of the fathers Of the noryshment or kyndlyng whiche they calle fomitâ—m they dispute that it is a qualitie of the bodie and accordyng to theyr accustomed foly they brynge in question whether the qualitie be caught by contagion of the apple or by the breathyng of the serpent whether it be encreased by prouocacyons with suche sorte of questioÌ„s they oppresse the pryncipall matter Thus when they speake of originall synne they omytte the vices of mannes nature whiche be more greuouse as the ignoraunce of god the despysyng of god the lacke of feare the lacke of truste in god the hatynge of goddes iudgemeÌ„t the fleyng of goddes iudgemeÌ„t the beyng angrye with god the despayre of grace the trustyng in worldly socours cÌ„ These dyseases moste repungnat to the lawe of god the scolastycall doctours espye nat Yea more ouer they attribute to mans nature hole power to loue god aboue all thynges to do the preceptê of god quo ad substantiam actuuÌ„ as they call it that is to saye as muche as belongeth to the substance of actes nor they see naÌ„t that they speake thynges merely repungnat for to haue power of a mans ê“pre streÌ„gth to loue god aboue all thynges to do the commaundementes of god what other thynge is this than to haue originall iustice That if mannes nature haue these so greate powers that of it selfe it may loue god aboue althingê as the scolemen do boldly affyrme what shal be original synne what shal we nede the grace of Christe if we may be saued by our owne propre iustice what shall we nede the holy ghoste if mans powers of them selues may loue god aboue al thynges and do his coÌ„mauÌ„demeÌ„tes who seeth nat howe vnryght the iudgemeÌ„t is of the aduersaries The lyter diseases of maÌ„nes nature they acknowledge but the most greuouse they acknowledge nat of the which yet the scripture dothe admonyshe vs in diuerse places and the prophetes do perpetually complayne of I meane of the carnall surenes of the cotempte of god of the hate of god and seÌ„blable vices engeÌ„dred within vs. But after that the scolasticall doctours dyd entermixe with Christes doctrine the philosophicall descantyng of the perfection of nature and attributed more than neded to frewyll and voluntarie actes taught men to be iustified before god by a certayne philosophicall or ciuile iustice whiche we also confesse to be subiecte to reason and after a fashyon to be in our power they coulde nat see the inwarde vncleÌ„nes of maÌ„nes nature For it can nat be iudged but by the worde of
acknowledge yâ— our harte naturally is voyde of loue of feare of trust towardê god Therfore saieth the prophete After that the haste shewed it vnto me I strake my thyghe Also I sayde in my traunce euery man is a lyar that is to saye an vntrewe thynker of god ⧠⧠Here the aduersaries do also reproue Luther because he wrote that originall synne remayneth after baptime They adde that this artycle was ryghtly coÌ„deÌ„pned by Leo the tenthe But the emperours maiestie shal espye here a manifest be spoken of ciuyle iudgement nat of the iudgement of god They sowe vnto them euen as wysely this sentence Nature is nat euyl this spoken in place is nat repreueable but it maye nat be wrested to the diminishyng of originall synne and yet these sentencies be red amonge scholemen whiche out of due season do mengle philosophie with the gospell Nor these were nat disputed only in scholes but froÌ„ the scholes they were brought to the people And those persuasions raygned and nourished the affiauÌ„ce of humane powers and oppressed the knowledge of the grace of Christe wherfore Luther wyllyng to declare the magnitude of original synne of humane infirmitie taught that the resydues or dregges of originall sine be of the owne nature in man nat indifferent thynges but that we nede the grace of god that they maye nat be imputed and the holy ghoste that it maye be mortified Albeit the scholemen do make lesse bothe the synne and the payne teachynge that man of hys owne power may do the commaundementes of god In Genesis is otherwyse described the payne due for originall synne For there nat only to deathe and other corporall punyshementes mans nature is made subiecte but also to the kyngdome of the deuyll For there is gyuen this horrible sentence I wyl put enmities betwexte the and the woman and betwexte thy sede and her sede Defaute and concupysceÌ„ce be punyshementes and also synnes Deathe other corporall euyls and the tyrannye of the deuyll be properly punyshementes For mans nature is gyuen into boÌ„dage and holden captiue of the deuyl whiche infecteth it with wycked opinions and errours and impelleth it to al kyndes of synne But as the deuyll can naâ— be vaynquyshed without the ayde of Christe â–ª so can nat we by our owne powers redeme our selues out of this bondage The very historie of the worlde sheweth vs howe greate is the power of the deuyls kyngdome The worlde is full of blasphemies agaynste god of wycked opinions and with these bondes the deuyl hath in captiuite the wyse and ryghtwyse men in the face of the worlde In other sume appere more grosse vices But when Christe is gyuen vnto vs whiche taketh awaye these synnes these punyshmentes and destroyeth the kyngdome of the deuyll synne and death the benefytes of Christe can nat be knowen onles we vnderstande our owne euyls Therfore of these thynges our preachers do diligently teache and they teache nat any newe thing but the holy scripture and sentences of holy fathers This we truste wyll satysfye the Emperours maiestie as touching yâ— chyldyshe and colde cauillacions by whiche the aduersaries haue sclaundered our article For we knowe that we beleue ryghtly and with the catholyk churche of Christe But if the aduersaries wyl renewe this contencyon there shal nat lacke lerned men amonge vs that shall make them answere and defende the truthe For the aduersaries in this cause vnderstande nat for the moste parte what they speake OfteÌ„tymes they speake thynges repugnant and they neyther expresse ryghtly dialectically the formall cause of originall synne nor the defaultê as they call them But we wolde nat in thys place ouer subtylly discusse theyr vayne and sophistical argumentê we thought it ynough to recyte the mynde of the holy fathers whoÌ„ we do folowe with commune knoweÌ„ wordê The thyrde article the aduersaries allowe in whiche we confesse two natures in Christe that is to wyte the nature humane assumpt of the worde into the vnitie of hys persone And that the selfe same Christe suffered and dyed to the entent to reconcyle vnto vs the father and rose agayne to the entent to reygne to iustifie and to sanctifie the beleuers cÌ„ accordyng to the Symbole of the apostles and the Symbole of Nicene ⧠⧠Of Iustificacyon ⧠IN the fourthe fythe syxte and also in the twenty article they condempne vs because we teache that men obtayne remission of synnes nat for theyr owne merites but frely for Christe by faythe in Christ. For they daÌ„ne bothe two poyntes fyrste that we denye that men for theyr owne merites do obtayne remission of synnes and secoÌ„darily that we affyrme that by faythe is obteyned remissioÌ„ of synnes and that men be iustified by faythe in Christe But sythe it is so that in this case or controuersie the pryncypall poynte of our religion is debated whiche ryghtly vnderstaÌ„de setteth forthe the honour of Christe and bryngeth a necessarie and plenteous consolacyon to the godly conscyence we desyre that the emperours maiestie wyll heare vs benyngly of these so greate maters For the aduersaries where as they neyther vnderstaÌ„de what is remission of synnes neyther what faythe â–ª neyther what grace nor what iustyce is pytyfully do defyle this poynt obscuryng the glorie and benefytes of Christe and bereue fronâ— the godly consciencies yâ— propouned coÌ„solacioÌ„s in Christe And to the ende we may maynteyne our coÌ„fessyon and assoyle the obiections of our aduersaries we shall fyrste premitte certayne thynges to the ende that the fountaynes of bothe our doctrines aswell ours as the aduersaries may be knowen The hole scripture ought to be distributed iÌ„to these pryncipal places law and promyses For otherwhyles it sheweth the lawe otherwhyles the promyse of Christ as when it promyseth Christ to cum and promiseth for hym remission of synnes iustificacyon and lyfe eternall or where in the Euangell Christ after he ones appered promyseth remission of synnes iustificacyoÌ„ and lyfe eternall we call the lawe in thys disputacyon the preceptes of the Decalogie in what place so euer they be red in scripture Of the ceremonies iudiciall lawes of Moses at thys tyme we speake nothyng Out of these the aduersaries take the lawe because mans reason after a fashyoÌ„ dothe naturally vnderstaÌ„de the lawe For it hathe styl the same iudgement wrytten by god iÌ„ the mynde and by the lawe they seke remission of synnes and iustificacion But the Decalogie requyreth nat only outward ciuile workes whiche reason can after a fashyon fulfyll but also it requyreth other thynges ferre aboue reason as truly to feare god truly to loue god truly to call on god truly to beleue that god heareth vs and to loke for the ayde of god in deathe and all afflictions fynally it requyreth obedieÌ„ce towarde god in afflictioÌ„s and in deathe that we escheue them nat nor grudge nat at them whan god lay them on vs. Here the scholemen folowynge the phylosophiers only do teache the iustice of
iustificemâ—â— ex fide Christi et non ex operibus legis .i. we beleue in Christ Iesu that we may be iustified by the fayth of Christ nat by the workes of yâ— lawe Ephe. 2. Gratia enim saluati estis per fidem et hoc noÌ„ ex vobis dei enim donum est non ex operibus ne quis glorietur .i. For by grace ye be saued by faythe and that nat of your selues for it is the gyft of god nor of your workes leaste any man shulde glorie IohaÌ„ 1. Dedit eis potestatem filios dei fieri his qui credunt in nomine eius qui non ex sanguimbus neque ex voluntate carnis neque ex voluntate viri sed ex deo nati sunt He gaue them power to becum the chyldren of god they I meane whiche beleue in his name whiche be borne nat of blodes neyther of the wyl of the fleshe neyther of the wyl of man but of god Ioh. 3. Sient Moses exaltauit serpeÌ„tem in deserto ita exaltari oportet filium hominis vt omnis qui credit in ipsum non pereat i. Lykewese as Moses exalted the serpent in desert so must the soÌ„ne of man be exalted that all whiche beleue in hym peryshe nat Also Non misit deus filium sunin in mundum vt iudicet muÌ„dum sed vt saluetur mundus per ipsum Qui credit iÌ„ eum non indicatur .i. God seÌ„t nat his son into the worlde that he shulde iudge the world but that the worlde shulde be saued by hym who beleueth in hym is nat iudged Actes 13. Notum igitur sit vobis viri fratres ê™ per hunc vobis remissio peccatorum annunciatur c. i. Be it knowen therfore vnto you o brethern that by him remission of synnes is preached vnto you and of al tho thinges by which ye coulde nat be iustified in the lawe in hym all that beleueth is iustifyed Howe myght it be more clearely spoken of the office of Christe and of iustifycacyon The lawe quod he iustifyed nat therfore Christe was gyuen that we shuld beleue that we be iustified for him He openly plucketh froÌ„ the lawe iustifycacyon Ergo for Christe we be accompted iuste whan we beleue that god is pacified with vs for hym Act. 4. This is the stone which is disallowed of you buylders whiche is made the corner-stone and there is nat helth in any other For there is none other name vnder heuen gyuen vnto men in which we ought to be saued But the name of Christ is only sticked to by fayth Ergo by the truste of his name and nat by the trust of our workê we be saued For name signifyeth here a cause whiche is alledged wherby helth is obteined And to alledge the name of Christ is to truste in the name of Christ as in the cause or pryce for whiche we be saued Act. 15. Fide purificans corda nostra i. By faythe purifyeng our hertes wherfore the faythe of whiche thapostles speake is nat an ydle knowledge but a thyng receyuyng the holy ghoste and iustifyeng vs. Abacuc 1. Iustus ex fide viuet The ryghtwyse man shall lyue of faythe Here fyrst he sayeth that men be iust by fayth because they beleue that god is mercifull and he addeth that the same fayth viuifyeth because this fayth genderethin the harte peace and ioy and euerlastynge lyfe ⧠⧠⧠Esa. 53. Noticia eius iudicabit multos .i. The knowledge of hiÌ„ shall iudge many But what is the knowledge of Christ but to knowe the benefitê of Christe the promyses whiche by the EuaÌ„gell he hathe sparsed into the worlde And to knowe the benefytes is properly and truly to beleue in Chryste and to beleue that the thinges whiche God hathe promysed for Chryste he wyll surelye fulfyll But the scrypture is ful of suche aucthorytes and testymonyes for otherwhiles it sheweth the lawe otherwhyles the promyses of Chryst remyssyon of synnes and free acceptaunce for Chryste ✚ There be also amonge holye fathers spred many lyke testymonyes For Saynt Ambrose sayth in hys Epystle to Ireneus thus Subditus autem mundus eo per legem factus est quia ex prescripto legis omnes conueniuntur et ex operibus legis nemo iustificatur id est quia per legem peccatum cognoscitur sed culpa non relaxatur Videbatur lex nocuisse que omnes fecerat peccatores sed veniens dominus Iesus peccatuz omnibê° quod nemo poterat euitare donauit et chirographum nostruÌ„ sui sanguinis effusione deleuit Hoc est quod ait Abundauit peccatuÌ„ per legem superabundauit autem gratia per Iesum Quia postquaÌ„ totus mundus subditus factus est totius muÌ„di peccatum abstulit sicut testificatus est Iohannes diceÌ„s Ecce agnus dei ecce qui tollit peccatuÌ„ mundi Et ideo nemo glorietur in operibus quia nemo factis suis instificatur Sed qui instus est donatum habet quia post lauacrum iustificatus est Fides ergo est que liberat per sanguinem Christi quia beatus ille cui peccatum remittitur et venia donatur That is to saye The world is made subiect therfore by the lawe because by the prescript of the lawe al be conuented before the hyghe iudge of the workes of the lawe no maÌ„ is iustifyed that is because by the lawe synne is knowen but the offence is not remytted the lawe semed to haue hurted whiche made all men synners but the lorde Iesus by his comyng pardoned unto al men synne whiche no man coulde eschewe and dyd clene stryke out our chirografe with the shedyng of his blode Thys is it that he sayeth Syn was aboundaunt by the lawe But grace by Iesus was more aboundant For after that the hole worlde was become subiecte he toke away the sinne of the hole worlde as testifieth Iohan saing Lo the lambe of god Lo he that taketh awaye the syn of the worlde And therfore lette no man glorye in hys workes for no man is iustyfyed hy hys factes But he that is iustifyed hath it gyuen him Wherfore fayth is the thynge which delyuereth by the bloude of Chryste for blyssed is he to whom synne is remytted and pardone gyuen These be the wordes of Saynt Ambrose which apertly do defende our opinion For he plucketh awaye from workes iustificacyon and gyueth it to faythe because it delyuereth by the bloude of Chryste Let all the Sentenciaryes be layde together on a heape be they furnyshed with neuer so gloryous tytles For some be called angelycal some seraphical some subtyle some irrefragable All they red and red agayne shal not make so moche to the vnderstandynge of Paule as thys one sentence of Saynte Ambrose dothe ☞ ⧠☞ In lyke sentence wryteth also Saynte Austyne moche agaynste the Pelagyans and in hys boke de spiritu et litera he saythe thus Ideo quippe proponitur iusticia legis ê™ qui
fecerit eaÌ„ viuet in illa vt cum quisque infirmitatem suam cognouerit non per suas vires neque per literam ipsius legis quod fieri non potest sed per fidem concilians iustificatorem perueniat et faciat et viuat in eam Opus rectum quod qui fecerit viuit in eo non fit nisi in iustificato Iustificatio autem ex fide impetratur i. For therfore is the iustyce of the lawe propowned that who dothe it shall lyue in it so that when euery man shal knowe hys owne infyrmity he may attayne it and do it and lyue in it not by hys owne powers neyther by the letter of the lawe which can nat be done but reconcylyng the iustyfier by fayth A ryght worke whiche who dothe shal lyue in it is not done but in a iustifyed person And iustificacyon is purchased by faythe Here he saythe clerely that the iustifyer is reconcyled by faythe and iustifycacyon is purchased by faythe And a lytle furder he sayth Ex lege timemus deum ex fide speramus in deum sed timentibus penam absconditur gratia sub quo timore anima Laborans c. per fidem confugiat ad misericordiam dei vt det quod iubet That is to saye By the lawe we feare god by fayth we truste in god but from theÌ„ that feare payne grace is hyd With whiche feare the soule oppressed must fle by fayth to the mercy of god that he maye gyue the thynge that he commaundeth Here Saynt Austine teacheth that by the lawe the hartes be made aferde but by fayth they receyue coÌ„solatyon And he teacheth that fyrste by faythe we muste purchase mercy or we go about to do the lawe we wyll recyte a lytle after other thinges also Truely it is a wonderfull thynge that the aduersaryes be nothinge moued with so many places of scrypture whiche openly gyue iustyficacyon to faythe and take it from workes Thynke they that the same thynge is so ofte repeted in vayne Or suppose they that the thynge so ofte repeted eschaped out of theyr mouthe inspired with the holy goste vnaduysedly But these idle workers haue inuented a proper cauillation to defete this matter They saye that Paule muste be vnderstonded be side formata so that they wyll not attrybute iustificacyon vnto faythe but by reason of loue nay vtterly they wyll not attrybute iustyfycacyon to faythe but only to loue For they dreame that faythe maye stande with mortall synne To what purpose belonge thys but that they wyll agayne dysanul the promyse and returne to the lawe If faythe receyueth remyssyon of synnes for loue remissyon of synnes shal be alwayes vncertayne for we neuer loue so moch as we owe yea we loue not onles our hartes be assured that our synnes be perdoned so the aduersaryes whyles in remyssyon of synnes and in iustyfycacyon they requyre a trustynge of theyr owe loue they vtterly disanull the Euangell of free remyssyon of synnes where as yet they nether performe that loue nor vnderstande it onles they beleue that remyssyon of synnes is frely receyued We also say that loue ought to folowe fayth as Paule also teacheth saynge In Chryste Iesu neyther cyrcumcysyon is any thyng worth nor vncircumcision but faythe workynge by loue And yet we maye not for al thys thynke that we shal be pardoned our synnes or be reconciled because of thys loue as we receyue not remyssyon of synnes for other workes folowynge but only by faythe in the proper sygnifycatyon we receyue remyssyon of synnes For the promyse can nat be taken but by faythe But fayth in the proper sence is thassentynge to goddes promyse For of thys faythe speketh scrypture And because it receyueth remyssyon of synnes and reconcyleth vs to god we be fyrst accompted ryghtwyse by faythe oâ— we loue do the lawe notwithstandynge loue ensueth And yet thys is nat an idle knowledge nor it can nat stande with synne but it is the worke of the holy goste wherby we be delyuered froÌ„ deathe and the myndes whiche tofore were affrayed erecte and viuifyed And because thê faythe receyueth onely remyssyon of synnes and maketh vs acceptable to god and quiet of conscyence it myght better be called gracia gratum faciens â— a grace makynge a maÌ„ acceptable then loue may whiche is theffecte ensuynge Hethervnto we haue very copiously shewed aswele by authorities of scrypture as by reasons deryued out of scrypture that by onely faythe is graunted remyssyon of synnes and that only faythe iustyfyeth that is maketh of iniust iust and regenerate It is easely iudged howe necessary the knowledge of thys faythe is For in this onely is espyed thoffyce of Chryst by this only we receyue the benefites of Chryst this only bryngeth vnto godly myndes a sure and ferme consolacyon And it is a necessarye thynge that some doctryne be publyshed in the churche by which men may conceiue a sure hope of helth For thaduersaries gyue vnhappy couÌ„sel vnto men which byd them doute whether they haue obtayned remyssyon or no. Howe shall these felowes bere vp them selues in deathe whiche haue harde nothiÌ„g of this faith which thinke that they owe to doute whether they haue obteyned remyssyon of synnes or no furthermore the Euaungell of Chryste must nedes be reteyned in the churche that is to say the promyse that synnes be frely remitted for Christ thys Euaungell they vtterly dysanull whiche teach nothynge of this fayth But the schole men of thys faythe speake nat one worde And our aduersaryes all to gether folowe them and do dysalowe thys faythe Nor they see nat that they defete the hole promyse of the fre remyssyon of synnes and of the iustyce of Chryst where as they dysproue thys faythe ¶ Of loue and fulfyllynge of the lawe HEre thaduersaryes obiecte Si vis ad vitam ingredi serua mandata That is to saye If thou wylte entre into lyfe kepe the commaundemeÌ„tes Also The doers of the law be iustified and many other lyke senteÌ„cies of the law to whiche before we make answere we wyll shewe our opinion of loue and of the fulfyllynge of the lawe It is wrytten in the prohete I wyll gyue my lawe in theyr hartes And Paule sayth that the lawe is establyshed and nat abrogate by fayth And Christ sayth If thou wylt enter into lyfe kepe the coÌ„maundementes Also If I haue not loue I am nothyng These and suche lyke sentencyes testifye that the lawe must begynne in vs although nat absolutely in an hyghe perfectyon and oweth to to encrease as moche as may be more more We speake not of the ceremonyes but of that law which is made of the motions of the hart I meane the Decalogye And bycause faythe bringeth with it the holy gost and engeÌ„dereth a newe lyfe in the hartes it muste of necessitie also engeÌ„der spiritual motions in the hartes And which be tho mocyons the prophete sheweth when he saythe I wyll gyue my loue into
meriteth only the fyrst grace and that we theÌ„ by our owne fulfyllyng of the lawe do please and deserue euerlastyng lyfe The mediatour Christe taryeth styll and we must alwaies thynke that for him we haue god pacifyed although we be vnworthy as Paule sayeth By hym we haue an entre to god thorugh fayth For our fulfyllyng of the lawe as we sayde is vnclene sythe our nature is horriblely corrupted Therfore the Psalme sayeth Blessed be they whose synnes be forgyuen Wherfore we haue nede of remission of synnes yea euen when we haue good workê But that remission is alwayes purchased by faythe so Christe remayneth a byshop and mediatour g o ergo that fulfyllyng of the lawe pleaseth nat of it selfe But because we coÌ„ceiue Christ by fayth and fele that we haue god pacified nat for the lawe but for Christe Fyfthly If we shulde thynke that after baptisme we ought to be accepted nat by fayth in Christ but for our fulfyllyng of the lawe our conscience shulde neuer be quyete but shulde runne into desperation For the lawe alwayes accuseth syth we neuer satisfy the lawe which thyng the hole churche coÌ„fesseth For Paule sayeth Good that I wolde do I do nat but euyl that I wolde nat do I do He also sayeth In mynde I serue the lawe of god but iÌ„ fleshe I serue the lawe of syn For who sufficiently loueth or sufficiently feareth god who paciently ynough susteyneth tribulacions whiche god putteth vpoÌ„ him who doth nat oft doubt whether humane thynges be ruled by goddes prouidence who doth nat oft doubte whether god heareth his prayer who dothe nat oft disdysdayne and grudge that the wycked haue better fortune than the godly people and that the godly be oppressed of the vngodly who is nat angrie with the iudgemeÌ„t of god whan he semeth to caste vs away who doth satisfy his calliÌ„g who loueth his neyghbour as him selfe who is nat ouerthrowen of his concupisceÌ„ce Of these synnes speaketh the psalme sayeng For this euery saynt shal pray to the. Lo here he sayeth that sayntes or holy men desyre remission of synnes They be more then blynde which se nat that the euil affectioÌ„s iÌ„ the fleshe be nat synnes of whiche Paule sayeth The fleshe lusteth agaynst the spirite the spirit agaynst the fleshe The fleshe distrusteth god trusteth in thinges present seketh humane socours in distresse and affliction yea agaynste the wyll of god it fleeth tribulations whiche by the commaundement of god it oweth to suffre it doubteth of the mercy of god The holy spirite in meÌ„nes tencies of the lawe one solution may be gyueÌ„ that the lawe can nat be done without Chryst if any ciuile workes be done without Christ they please not god Wherfore when the workes be preached it is necessarye to be added that fayth is requyred that for faythe they be preached that they be frutes and testimonies of faythe What thynge can be spoken more symply and syncerely thaÌ„ this doctryne For it is necessarie to the knowledge of the benefytes of Christ to discerne the promyses from the lawe Ambiguouse and perilous causes do engender many and sundry solutions But in good and ferme causes one or two solutions taken out of the fountaynes do answere all that maye be obiected Whiche thynge also appereth in thys our cause For that rule whiche I ryght nowe recyted expounneth all the saynges whiche be recited of the lawe and of the workes For we graunte that the scripture otherwhyles doth teache the lawe otherwhyles the free promyse of remyssyon of synnes for Christe But our aduersaries do vtterly destroy the promyse in sainge that fayth dothe not iustifie but teache that for our loue and workes we receyue remission of synnes reconciliation For yf remissyon of synnes shulde hange of the condicion of our workes so were it very vncertayne For we neuer do sufficient workes Then the promyse shall be put out of yre Wherfore we call agayne good myndes to the coÌ„sideration of the promisses and we teache them of the free remyssyon and reconcilement that is made by the faythe in Christe After thys we adde also the doctrine of the lawe nat that by the lawe we shulde deserue forgyuenes of siÌ„nes or that for the lawe we shulde be compted ryghtwyse and nat for Christ but for thys entent because god requireth good workes For we muste wysely distincte the lawe and the promyses It must be sene what scripture gyueth to the lawe and what to the promyses For it prayseth and commaundeth good workes in such sorte that it taketh not awaye the free promyse nor the benefyte that we haue by Christe For good workes are to be done because God requireth them and therfore they be the effectes of regeneration as Paule teacheth We be his worke made by Christe Iesus to good workes whiche God hathe prepared that we shuld walke in them Wherfore good workes ought to ensue faythe as a geuynge of thankes towarde god also that in them faythe maye be bothe excercised and encrease and be shewed to other that by our confessyon other maye be styrred to deuotyon Therfore sayth Paule that Abraham toke circumcisioÌ„ not that for the very worke he shuld be compted ryghtwise but that he might haue a marke printed in his body wherby he myght be brought in rememberaunce and conceyue styll more faythe and more Also to thentente he shulde confesse hys fayth before other and by hys wytnessynge prouoke other to beleue So Abell by reason of hys faythe offered a more acceptable sacrifice for the sacrifice pleased god not for the very sacrifice but bycause Abel by hys faythe was assured that god was pleased with him because of hê mercie And he dyd that worke only to th ende to excercise his faythe and to prouoke other by hys ensample and confessyon to beleue Syth good workes ought after thys sorte ensue faythe men that can nat beleue and determyne in theyr hartes that they be frely pardoned for Christes sake â–ª do vse workes farre an other way These persons when they see the workes of sayntes and holy persons they iudge after a worldly fashoÌ„ that the sayntes by tho workes haue deserued forgiuenes of synnes and that for tho workes they be accompted ryghtwyse before God Therfore they folowe them and thynke that by lyke workes they deserue remyssion of synnes they go aboute to pacifye the ire of God and truste that for suche workes they shall be accompted ryghtwyse These wycked opinions in workes we damne Fyrst because they obscure the glory of Christ when men do propowne to god these workes as a pryce raunsom Thus the honour due to only Christ is gyuen to our workes Secondly because that notwithstandynge all theyr good workes yet the conscyence fyndeth no peace in them but heapynge workes vpon workes in true trobles at laste dispayreth for when it findeth no worke clene ynoughe the lawe alwayes accuseth and engendreth ire Therdly Such neuer atteyne to the knowledge of god when
saythe That they do eate condempnation to them selfes who soeuer do eate vnworthely Therfore the ê‘sons and curates do not compell those ê‘sones which be vnmete to vse the sacrameÌ„tê OF the nombryng of synnes in coÌ„fession men be in suche wyse taughte that consciences be not snarled and entangled although it is ê“fitable to vse and accustome vnlerned persones to reherse certeyn synnes that they may the more easely be taughte But we dsspute now what is necessary by goddê lawe Our aduersaries therfore oughte not to haue alledged the constitution to vs. Omnis utriusque sexus c. Whiche constitution we knowe well ynoughe but they shulde haue proued by the lawe of god that nombrynge or rekenynge vp of synnes is necessarye to obteyne remission The hole Churche throughout all Europa knowethe what maner grynnes snares that particle of the coÌ„stitution hath cast vpon consciences whiche byddeth to confesse all our synnes Neyther is there so moche hurte in the texte it selfe as afterwardê the Summistê haue fayned to it whiche do gather the circuÌ„staunces of synnes What endeles mases be there What a tormeÌ„trie of good myndê hath ben there For as for them that were wylde and vngodly suche maner fearynges dyd nothynge moue at all Afterwardes what maner tragedies and troubles hath the question De proprio sacâ—rdote that is to say of a propre or peculiar preeste raysed amonge curates and freers whiche whan they dyd warre aboute the kyngdome of Confessions were nothyng lesse than frâ—tres whiche they were called We therfore do thynke that the rehersal or nombrynge vp of synnes is not necessarye by the lawe of god And this is the mynde of Panormitanus and of the most part of the other lerned in the lawe Neyther wyll we lay a necessite vpon the consciences of other men by that constitution Omnis utriusque sexus c. Of whiche we do iudge lykewyse as we do of other humaine traditions Of whiche we haue this opinion that they be not honours or services necessary to iustification And this constitution commaundeth a thynge vnpossible where as it byddeth vs coÌ„fesse all our synnes For it is certayne that very many of them we do neyther remeÌ„bre nor perceyue accordyng to that sayeng of the psalme Delicta quis intelligit who perceyueth synnes or trespasses If they be good pastors they shall know how farre forthe it is profitable to examine vnlerned people But we wyll not confirme establyshe that tormentry of Summistes whiche yet shulde haue ben least intollerable if they had added one worde of faythe confortynge and lyftynge vp consciences Nowe of this faythe obteynynge remission of synnes there is not one syllable in so great an heape of coÌ„stitutions of gloses of summes of confessionalles Christ is neuer redde in none of them all Onely there is redde accomptynges and nombrynges of synnes And the moste parte is spente in synnes coÌ„mitted agaynst the traditions of men whiche is moste vayne This doctrine hathe dryuen many godlye myndes to desperation whiche coulde not be quiete and in reste because they thoughte that the iuste rehersall of synnes was necessary by goddes lawe and yet they founde by experience that it was impossible But there remayne in the doctrine of our aduersaries touchyng penaunce other as greate defaltes whiche we shal forthewith reherse Of penaunce or repentaunce IN the .xij. article they approue the fyrste parte in whiche we declare that they whiche haue fallen into synne after baptime maye obteyne remission of synnes at what tyme soeuer and howe ofte soeuer they be coÌ„uerted The seconde parâ—t they condeÌ„pne in whiche we say that the partes of penaunce be contrition and faythe They deny that fayth is the one parte of penaunce What may we here do Oh moste victorious emperour Thys is the propre voyce of the gospell that by faythe we obteyne remission of synnes Thys voyâ—e of the gospell those wryters of the confutation do condeÌ„pne We can therfore in no wyse agre to the confutation We can nat coÌ„dempne the moste holsome sayeng of the gospell so full of comforte What other thynge is it to denye that by faythe we do obteyne remission of synnes then to do iniury to the blode and death of Christe We beseche you therfore O charles moste victorious Emperour that ye wyll paciently and diligently heare vs and knowe this most wayghty matter which conteyneth the principall place of the gospell the trewe knowledge of Christe and the very honour of god For all men shall fynde that we in thys matter specially haue taught true thynges godly thynges holsome thynges necessary thynges to the hole churche of Christ. They shall fynde that by the wrytynge of our men muche lyght hathe come to the gospell and that many perilous errours be amended with â—he whiche the doctrine of repentaunce was here tofore suppressed by the opinioÌ„s of schole doctours and Canonistes And before we come to the defence of our sentence and opinion thys muste we nedes speake before All good men of all orders euen also of the theologicall ordre do confesse and graunt that before the wrytinges of Martine Luther the doctrine of repentaunce was verie confuse There be bokes of senteÌ„tiaries wherin be infinite questioÌ„s whiche no diuines coulde euer sufficieÌ„tly declare The people could neither coÌ„prise the suÌ„me of the matter neither yet see what thynges were principally required in penaunce neyther wherin peace of conscience was to be sought Let one of our aduersaries come forthe which can tell vs when remission of siÌ„nes is done or wrought Good lord what greate darkenes is amonge theÌ„ They doubte whether in attrition orels in coÌ„trition remission of synnes be had And if it be had for contrition what nedeth absolution What dothe the power of the keyes if synne be alredy forgiuen And here also they do sweate labour muche more and do wickedly extenuate and minishe the power of the keyes Other some there be whiche saye that by the power of the keyes synne is nat forgeuen but only eternal paynes be chaunged into temperall paynes So were the moste holsom power auctorite a ministration nat of lyfe and of spirite but only of wrathe and punyshementes Some of them agayne whiche be sumwhat more wylye do fayne ymagyne that by the power of the keyes synnes be forgeuen in the syght of the churche but nat in the syght of god Thys also is a perilous and mischeuous errour For if the power of the keyes dothe nat comforte vs in the syght of god What thynge then I pray you shal make a quiete coÌ„science Nowe these thynges the folowe be also more perplex doubteful and intricate They teache that we do merite grace by contrition Where if a man aske why Saul Iudas and other lyke do nat obteyne grace and pardone with moste bytter and horrible remorse whiche were coÌ„trite Here they ought to make theyr aunswere by faythe and by the gospell bycause Iudas dyd nat beleue because he dyd nat
any thyng propre nat to reuenge These opinions do greatly deface the gospel and the spirituall kyngdome and they be perilous to comen weales For the gospel dothe nat destroy the good ordre of a citye or of an house but muche rather dothe approue and allowe it and dothe bydde vs nat only for feare of punyshement but also for coÌ„sciences sake to obey them as being the ordenaunce of god Iuliane the apostata Celsus and very many other haue obiected against christen men that the gospell dothe destroye comen weales because it dothe forbid vengeaunce and dothe teache certayne other thynges nothyng mete ne agreinge to the ciuile societe and felowshyp And these questions haue merueilously troubled Origen Gregori Nazanzen other wheÌ„ verely they easely may be dissolued if we do knowe that the gospell gyueth no lawes concernynge the ciuile state but that it is forgyuenes of synnes a begynnyng or in choation of eternal lyfe in the hartê of al beleuers But as for outwarde orders of comen weales it dothe nat only approue them but also doth make vs subiecte vnto them Lykewyse as we be necessarily subiecte to the lawes of tymes to the chaunge of wynter and somer as vnto the ordenaunces of god The gospell dothe forbydde priuate vengeaunce And this thing for this purpose Christe dothe so ofteÌ„ inculke and repete that the apostles shulde nat thinke that they ought to take awaye thempire from theÌ„ which helde it so as the Iewê dyd dreame of the kiÌ„gdome of Messias but that they shulde knowe that they ought to teache and preache of the spiritual kingdome and not to chaunge the ciuile estate So than priuate vengeaunce is forbeden not by counsayle but by precepte and coÌ„maundemeÌ„t in the .v. chapitre of Matthue and in the .xij. to the Romanes The comen vengeauÌ„ce or punyshement whiche is done by the office of the gouernour is not for byd ne dissuaded but is commaunded and is the worke of god accordyng to the sayeng of Paule in the .xiij. chapitre to the Romanes And certayne kyndes of publike vengeaunce be the iudgementes ponyshementes warres and batayles Of these thynges howe euyll many wryters haue iudged it is euident and playne for they haue bene in this errour and wronge opinion that the gospell is a certeyn newe outwarde and monastical pollicie or ordre of a comen weale and they dyd not see that the gospell dothe brynge eternall iustice to the hertes and outwardely dothe approue the ciuile estate This also is a very false lye that it is christen perfection not to kepe any thyng propre For the christen pfection doth not stande in the contempte and despisyng of ciuile ordenauÌ„ces but in the motions of the harte in the great feare of god in great fayth as AbrahaÌ„ Dauid Daniel euen in those great ryches and empires were no lesse pfecte than any heremites But monkes and freres haue cast that outwarde hypochrisy before the yies of men lest elles men myght se in what thyngê standeth true perfection O lorde god with what prayses haue they magnified the coÌ„munion of thynges as a thynge euangelicall But there is moche ieoê‘dy in these prayses namely sith they be farre disagreing from the scriptures For the scripture dothe not commaunde thynges to be comen But the Decalogie that is to say the lawe of the tenne coÌ„maundementes whan it saythe Thou shalte do no thefte maketh a diuision ê‘tition or seueraunce of possessions and dominions and coÌ„maundeth euery man to kepe that thynge whiche is his owne Undoubtedly Wyclefe was madde whiche sayde that it was not laufull for preestes to haue any thynge propre There be also infinite disputatioÌ„s of coÌ„tractes and bargaynes with whiche good consciences can neuer be satisfied onles they know this rule that it is laufull for a christen man to vse the ciuile ordenaunces and lawes This rule stayeth the coÌ„sciences whan it teacheth that bargaynes be so farforthe laufull in the syghte of god as longe as the gouerners or lawes do approue them All this hole place of polytyke or ciuile thyngê hath ben so opened and set forthe of our teachers that very many good menne whiche be busyed and occupyed in the comen weale and in worldly busynesses haue openly saide that they haue ben greatly holpen whiche before dyd doubte beinge vexed with the opinions of monkes and freres whether the gospell dyd permyt and suffre those ciuile offices and busynesses yea or no. These thingê we haue therfore rehersed that euen strauÌ„gers also maye vnderstande that by this kynde of doctrine whiche we do folowe the auctoritie of rulers gouernours and officers and also the dignitie of all ciuile ordenaunces is not â—ynyshed ne enfebled but rather strengthed and fortified The renowme and auctoritie of whiche thynges was before with folyshe opinions of monkes and freers meruaylously defaced whiche dyd farre preferre the folyshe and moste vayne hypochrisye of pouertie and humilitie afore the ordre of a Citie or of an house where as in verye dede the orderynge and administration of a realme or of a citie and the orderynge of an house hath for it the coÌ„maundementes of god but that platonical coÌ„munitie of all thynges hath not for it the coÌ„maundement of god THe .xvij. article our aduersaries do receyue without exception in whiche we confesse that Christ shall appere in the ende of the worlde and shall rayse vp agayne all deade men and shal rendre vnto good men eternall lyfe and eternall ioyes and shall condempne wycked men to be tourmented perpetually with the deuyll ⧠Of frewyll ⧠THe .xviij. article coÌ„cernyng frewyll our aduersaries do receyue howbeit they adde auctorities and testimonies lytle mete or agreynge to that matter they adde also a declamation that we ought not to extolle ne magnifie frewyll ouermoche with the Pelagianes neyther yet to take away all maner libertie from it with the Manichies Gayly well sayd forsothe but what difference is there betwyxte the Pelagianes and our aduersaries sythe it is so that they bothe do thynke that men may without the holy ghost bothe loue god fulfyll the coÌ„maundementê of god as touchynge to the substaunce of the actes or dedes merite grace and iustificatioÌ„ with workes whiche reason by her selfe doth worke without the holy ghooste Howe many folyshe and inconuenient thinges do ensue of these Pelagianical opinioÌ„s which be taught with greate auctoritie in scholes These opinions Augustine folowyng saynt Paule doth vehemently confute whose sentence mynde we haue recited here before in the article of iustification Neyther do we take away libertie from mannes wyll Mannes wyll hath libertie in chosyng of workes or thynges whiche reason dothe comprehende and perceyue by her selfe Mans wyll may some maner way worke ciuile iustice or the iustice of workes it may speake of god it may gyue vnto god certein honour or seruice with the outward worke it may obey gouernours and rulers it may obey father and mother in chosynge of the out warde
worke it may holde her handes from murdre from adulterie from thefte Sythe there is lefte in the nature of man reason and iudgement of thynges sensible there is lefte also a choyse of these thynges and a libertie and power to worke ciuile iustice For yâ— doth the scripture cal the iustice of the flesshe whiche iustice carnal nature that is to say reason dothe worke by her owne selfe withoute the holy ghooste howbeit the strength of concupiscence is so greate that men do more often obeye and folowe lewde affections than the ryght iudgement And the deuyll who hath greate power ouer wycked persones as saynt Paule saythe dothe not ceasse to styrre and prouoke this weyke nature vnto diuerse and sondry synnes These be the causes wherfore euen ciuile iustice also is so seldome a thynge amonge men that as â—e do see not the philosophers them selues haue attayned it whiche seme to haue greately desyred it But this is a false sayeng to say that man doth not synne whiche dothe the workes of the coÌ„maundementê out of grace And they adde also more that remission of synnes and iustification is due of necessitie to suche maner workes For the hertes of men without the holy ghoste be without feare of god without trust towardes god they do not beleue that they be herde of god that theyr synnes be forgyuen that they be holpen and saued of god Therfore they be wycked But so it is that an euyll tree can not brynge forthe good frutes And without faythe it is impossible to please god Wherfore although we graunt vnto frewyll libertie and power to worke the outwarde workes of the lawe yet we graunt not to frewyll power to worke spirituall workes that is to witte to drede god truelye to beleue and truste in god truelye to decree with it selfe truelye and to thynke that god dothe loke vpon vs doth heare vs dothe forgyue vs. c. These be the verye workes of the fyrst table whiche maÌ„nes herte can not worke without the holye ghooste as Paule saythe The naturall man that is to saye man vsynge onely his naturall powers dothe not perceyue those thynges whiche be of god And this may be iudged if men consydre howe the hertes do thynke of the wyll of god whether they do verelye decree with them selues that they be fauoured and herde of god This fayth it is an herde thyng euen for holy men also to kepe and holde fast ergo moche lesse it is in wycked men and it is receyued as we sayd before whan hertê thrughly made affrayde do heare the gospell and do take consolation and conforte This distribution therfore or diuision is profitable in whiche ciuile iustice is assigned and gyuen to frewyll spirituall iustice to the gouernauÌ„ce of the holy hhoste in them that be regenerate and borne agayne in Christe For so is kepte and reteyned good ordre and discipline For all men ought to knowe bothe that god dothe require that ciuile iustice and that we be able after a certeine maner to ê‘fourme fulfyll it And yet neuertheles there is shewed the diuersitie betwyxte ciuile iustice and spirituall iustice betwyxte philosophicall iustice and the doctrine of the holy ghoste and it may be ê‘ceiued where we haue nede of the holy ghoste Neyther is this diuision fyrst inuented by vs â–ª but the scripture dothe moste euideÌ„tly teache it Augustine also treateth of the same and of late dayes it was very well handeled of Wyllyam of Parrhise but it is vngraciously and wyckedly troden vnder foote and oppressed by them whiche haue dreamed that men may obeye the lawe of god without the holy ghoste And that the holye ghoost is gyuen there where is respecte of merites ⧠Of the cause of synne THe .xix. article our aduersaries receyue in whiche we confesse that althoughe one god alone hath created made all nature and doth conserue and kepe all thingê that be yet that notwithstandynge the cause of synne is in the deuyll and men a wyll turnynge it selfe awaye from god accordynge to the sayenge of Christe of the deuyll Cum loquitur mendacium ex propriâ—s loquitur Whan he speaketh a lye he speaketh of his owne ⧠Of workes IN the .xx. article they put these wordê expressely that they do reiecte and disalowe our sayenge that men do not merite forgyuenes of synnes by good workes This article they do saye openly and playnly that they do reiecte disalowe What is to be sayd in a matter so manifest Here the workmaysters of the confutation do openly shewe and declare with what spirite they be moued and ledde For what is more certein vndoubted in the churche thaÌ„ that forgyuenes of sinnes coÌ„meth freely for Christê sake that Christe is the mercy stocke for our synnes not oure workes as Peter sayth To hym all the prophetê beare witnesse that in his name al they that beleue in hym do receyue remission of synnes To this churche of the prophetes let vs assente and agree rather than to these vngratious writers of the coÌ„futation whiche so boldely without shame blaspheme Christe For although there haue ben certein writers whiche haue thought that after the remission of synnes men be ryghtuouse in the syghte of god not by fayth but by the selfe workes yet dyd they neuer thinke this that the remission of synnes doth come for our workes sake and not freelye for Christis sake Therfore this blasphemye is not to be suffred that the honoure of Christe be gyuen translated to our workê These diuines be ashamed of nothiÌ„g if they dare pronounce suche maner sentence in the Churche And we do not doubte but that the Emperours maiestie and the mooste parte of the princis wolde in no wyse leaue this place remaynynge in the confutation if they were admonyshed ⧠⧠We coulde in this place recite infinite authorities and testimonies of the scripture and of the fathers but we haue sayd many thynges alredye of this matter heretofore And there is no nede to reherse many testimonies vnto hym whiche knowethe wherfore Christe was gyuen vnto vs and whiche knoweth that Christ is the mercy stocke for our synnes Esaie sayth The lorde hath layde on hym the iniquities of vs. Our aduersaries do teache the coÌ„trary that god dothe laye our iniquities not on Christe but on our owne workes Neyther it lustethe me here to tell what maner workê they teache We do se an horrible decree to be made agaiÌ„st vs whiche shulde feare vs a greate dele more if we dyd stryue aboute doubtfull or tryflynge matters But nowe for asmoche as our consciences do vnderstande and knowe that oure aduersaries condempne the manifeste truthe the defence wherof is necessarye to the hole churche and dothe amplifie and set forth the glorie of Christ we easyly despise al terrours and punyshementes of the worlde and with a bolde mynde we shall abyde and suffre if any thyng is to be suffred for the glorie of Christ and for
with them There be other diuersities betwixt the ordre of prestes and the state of the people but it is easy to se what is theyr entente and why they do defende this diuersitie or difference so greatly But we leaste we myghte seme to minishe the true dignitie of the ordre wyll speake nomore at this tyme of this theyr craftye and subtyle purpose They alledge also the peryll and ieoperdie of spyllyng and certayne lyke thynges whiche haue nat so greate strengthe as to chauÌ„ge the ordenaunce of Christ. And let vs put the case that it were free eyther to vse the one parte or bothe Howe can yet the prohibition be defended Howbeit the churche dothe nat take this libertie vnto her that she may make of Christê ordenauÌ„ces thinges indifferent We verely do excuse the church which hathe susteined this iniury and wronge because they myght nat be suffred to haue bothe partes but the auctours and causers whiche do defende that it is wel done to prohibite the vse of the hole sacrament and which nat only do prohibite the vse but also do excommunicate and persecute with violence them that do vse the hole sacramente these persones I saye we can nat excuse Let theÌ„ loke to theyr owne charge howe they wyll make aunswere to god what cause they wyll shewe of these theyr purposes and ententê Neyther is it to be iudged forthwith that the churche dothe ordeyne or approue what soeuer thynges the bysshopes of Rome do ordeyne namely sythe the scripture dothe prophesie of bysshopes and curates that they shulde so do as Ezechiel sayeth Peribit lex a sacerdote The lawe shall begyn to peryshe at the preste ⧠Of the wedlocke of preestes ⧠NOtwithstandyng the greate infamy which goeth abrode of the filthie single lyfe of prestes yet neuertheles or aduersaries dare â—at only defende the bysshop of Romes lawe vnder the wycked cloke and false pretence of the name of god but also they dare exhorte the emperour and the princes that in nowyse they shulde suffre the wedlockes of prestes to the greate shame and infamy of the Romayne empire for so they speake What more vnshamefastnes hathe euer ben redde in any hystorye then is this of our aduersaries For the argumentes whiche they vse we shall reherse afterwardes Nowe let the wyse reader considre what shame these vile wretches haue whiche say that wedlocke dothe engendre shame and infamy to the empire as who shulde saye that the churche is greatly garnyshed and renoumed by the open infamy of those vngratious and prodigious kyndes of lechery whiche do brenne amoÌ„ge these holy fathers whiche outwardly do couÌ„terfet and pretende the sadnes and vertue of Curius but in corners liue most viciously and voluptuously Yea and a greate parte of those thyngê may nat be so moche as named with honestie whiche these men ceasse nat to do with great boldnes And these theyr prodigious voluptuousnes and lustes they desyre to haue defended with your moste chaste ryght hande moste noble Emperour whome euen certayne olde ê“phecies do call the kyng with the chaste face For it apperith very well that this was spoken of you pudicus facie regnâ— bit ubique The chaste in face shall raygne euery where They desyre that contrary to the lawe of god contrary to the lawe of all nations coÌ„trary to the canones of the couÌ„cels ye shulde pul in sundre and breake matrimonies that ye shulde ordeyne greuous sore punyshmentes agaynst innocente men for cause of wedlocke that ye shulde kyll prestes whoÌ„ euen the Barbarianes do reuerently and religiously spare that ye shulde dryue women fatherles chyldren into exile as persons outlawed and banished Suche sort of lawes they offre vnto you moste good and moste chaste Cesar whiche no barbarous nation beit neuer so cruell and beastly coulde fynde in theyr harte to heare But for asmoche as in these your gratious maners there can be no filthynes or crueltie we hope that ye wyll in this cause deale gentely with vs namely after that ye shall knowe that we haue mooste wayghtye causes for the mayntenauÌ„ce of our sentence opinion taken out of the worde of god agaynst whiche oure aduersaries do set moste tryfelynge and most vayne persuations And yet they do not defende single lyfe earnestely For they knowe howe fewe of them do kepe chastitie but they cloke their kyngdome with a colour and semblaunce of religion to the whiche kyngdome of theyrs they do reken single lyfe to be very profitable so that now we may perceyue that Peter gaue warnynge very well that in tyme to come false prophetes shulde deceyue men with fayned wordes For our aduersaries nothynge say nothyng wryte nothyng do in all this hole cause truely simply playnly charitablye but in verye dede they stryue aboute theyr lordeshyp and kyngedome whiche they do falsely suppose to be in ieopardie and this they go aboute to fortifie and maynteyne vnder the wycked pretence and colour of vertue and holynes But we in no wyse can approue this lawe of lyuynge single without wyues which our aduersaries do so greatly defende because it is repugnaunte to the lawe of god to the lawe of nature and disagreinge from the very canones of the councaylles And vndoubted it is also that it is superstitious and perylous For it engendreth infinite sclaunders synnes and corruptynge of the publyke maners Other of our coÌ„trouersies do require some disputation of lerned men In this matter the thynge is so manifest on bothe sydes that it nedeth no disputation at all onely it requireth a iudge that is a good man whiche feareth god And notwithstandyng that we defende the manifeste veritie yet our aduersaries haue deuised certeyne cauillations to mocke out our argumentes Fyrste of all the booke of Genesis teacheth that men were created that they shulde be frutefull that the man shulde desyre the company of the woman and contrarywyse by ryght reason For we speake not of concupiscence whiche is synne but of that appetite which shuld haue ben in nature vncorrupted whiche they call naturall appetite And this appetite is verely goddes ordenaunce of the one kynde or sexe to the other Nowe sythe this ordenauÌ„ce of god can not be taken away without the siÌ„guler and special worke of god it folowethe that the lawe of contractynge of matrimonie can not be taken awaye with statutes or vowes Our aduersaries do make here a cauillation and say that at the begynnynge of the worlde it was coÌ„maunded that the earthe shulde be fylled but now the earth beinge full they say that wedlocke is not coÌ„maunded Se howe wysely they iudge The nature of man is formed and created thrughe that worde of god that it shulde be frutefull not only in the begynnyng of creation but so loÌ„ge as this nature of the bodies shal be euen likewise as the earthe is made fruteful by vertue of thê worde Germinet terra herbam uirentem Let the earth briÌ„g forth grene grasse By thê
ordenaunce of god the earthe began not only at the begynnyng to brynge forthe grasse but yerelye the feldes be couered vestured with grasse â–ª and shal be whyles the worlde and this nature of thynges shall continue and endure Therfore lykewyse as by the laws of man the nature of the earthe can not be chauÌ„ged euen so neyther by vowes neyther by any lawes may the nature of man be chaunged without the speciall worke of god SecuÌ„darily because this creation or ordinaunce of god in man is the law of nature therfore the men of lawe haue sayde very well and wyselye that the coupelynge of man and woman together is of the lawe of nature Nowe sythe the lawe of nature is immutable and can not be chaunged it foloweth necessarilye that the power and libertie to contracte matrimonie dothe alwayes remayne abyde For whan nature is not chaunged that ordenaunce also must nedes remayne whiche god gaue vnto nature neyther can it be taken away by any maÌ„nes lawê That therfore is but a folyshe sayenge whiche our aduersaries after theyr tryfelynge maner do saye that wedlocke was coÌ„maunded at the begynnyng but it is not coÌ„maunded nowe This is euen lyke wyse as if they shulde say In olde tyme men whaÌ„ they were borne brought with them in to the worlde the naturall appetite theyr sexe or kynde but nowe they do not so In olde tyme whaÌ„ they were borne they brought with them the lawe of nature nowe they do not so No workeman coulde euer desyre or imagyne any thynge more craftelye and lyke a craftes man than these folyshe tryfles haue ben imagyned to elude and auoyde the law of nature Let this thynge therfore abyde stable stedfaste in this cause whiche bothe the scripture teacheth the man of law hath wysely spokeÌ„ thaâ— the ioyniÌ„ge together of man and woman is the lawe of nature But the lawe of nature is in dede the lawe of god For it is an ordenaunce imprinted by god in nature And because this lawe can not be chaunged without the speciall worke of god it is necessary and can not be auoyded but that power libertie to contracte matrimonie muste nedes abyde For that naturall appetite is the ordenaunce of god in nature of one kynde or sexe to an other and therfore it is ryght and lawe for els why shulde bothe kyndes be created And we speake as it was sayde before not of concupiscence whiche is synne but of that appetite whiche they cal naturall loue or affectioÌ„ whiche loue coÌ„cupiscence hath not taken out of nature but rather dothe kendle it so that nowe it hath more nede of remedye and wedlocke is nowe necessary not onely because of procreation but also because of remedye These thynges be clere euident and so sure and stronge that they can be by no meanes auoyded ⧠⧠⧠Thyrdely Paule sayth For cause of fornication lette euerye man haue a wyfe of his owne This is an expresse coÌ„mauÌ„dement belongyng to all men whiche be not mete to the single lyfe Our aduersaries do byd that we shulde shewe a coÌ„mauÌ„dement vnto them whiche coÌ„maundeth preestes to wedde wyues as though preestê were no men Certes we iudge that those thynges whiche we dispute in general of the nature of man do also apperteine to preestes Dothe not Paule coÌ„maunde here that those men shulde marie wyues whiche haue not the gyfte of coÌ„tinence and chastite For Paule declareth his owne self not longe after whan he saythe It is better to marye than to burne And Christe sayde playnlye Non omnes capiuÌ„t uerbum hoc sed quibus datum est .1 Al men do not take this sayeng but they only to whom it is gyuen For nowe after synne these two thinges go together naturall appetite and concupiscence whiche inflameth naturall appetite so yâ— nowe there is more nede of wedlocke than was whan nature was perfecte and incorrupted Therfore Paule speaketh of wedlocke as of a remedie And for to auoyde those brennynges and inflammations of the luste he coÌ„maundeth to mary Neyther can any auctoritie or any lawe of man â–ª or any vowes take awaye this sayenge of Paule It is better to mary than to brennne For these sayde thynges take not away nature or coÌ„cupiscence Therfore who soeuer burne haue power libertie to mary And they be bouÌ„de by this coÌ„maundement of Paule that for to auoyde fornication euery one shulde haue a wyfe of his owne as many as do not truelye conteyne lyue chaste the iudgement wherof apperteyneth to euery maÌ„nes owne coÌ„scieÌ„ce For where our aduersaries do bydde vs here desyre continence of god and do byd vs also to tame and mortifie oure bodye with labours and abstinence why do they not synge these hyghe preceptes to theyr owne selues But as we saide before our aduersaries do nought els but tryfle they do nothynge earnestlye If continence or chastitie were possible to all men than it shulde not require a speciall gyfte But Christe sheweth that there is nede of a speciall gyfte wherfore all men do not attayne it The residue whiche haue not this gyfte god wyllethe to vse the comon lawe of nature whiche he hath ordeyned For god is not contente that his ordenaunces or his creatures be despised In suche wyse he wylleth them to be chaste that yet they maye vse the remedy whiche god hath ordeyned Lyke wyse as he wyll that we so mainteine our lyfe if we do vse meate and drynke And Gerson witnessethe yâ— there haue ben many good men whiche haue endeuoured them selues to tame theyr bodye yet it hath lytle auayled them Therfore Ambrose saythe very well Onelye virginitie is the thynge whiche may be counsaylled but can not be coÌ„mauÌ„ded it is a thing more of wysshe or desyre thaÌ„ of coÌ„mauÌ„demeÌ„t If any maÌ„ wyll obiecte here that Christ doth prayse them whiche do gelde them selues for the kyngdome of heuen â–ª let hym also coÌ„sidre this that he prayseth suche maner men whiche haue the gyfte of coÌ„tinence And therfore he added Qui potest capere capiat He that may take let hym take For vnclene fylthy continence dothe not please Christe we also do prayse true continence But we do nowe dispute of the lawe and of them which haue not the gyfte of continencie The thynge ought to be lefte free there ought no bondes or snares to be caste vpon the weyke persones by this lawe Fourthly the law of the byshop of Rome disagreeth also from the canones of the councels For the olde canones do not prohibite wedlocke neyther do they breake or departe wedlocke alredye contracted Albeit they do remoue them from ministration whiche haue made contracte in the tyme that they were in ministerie And this remouyng of them from administration was at those tymes in steade of a benefite But the newe canones whiche were not made in the couÌ„sels but by the priuate wyll of popes bothe do prohibite to coÌ„tracte matrimonie
of the lord dothe nat coÌ„ferre ne gyue grace by the vertue of the worke that is wrought neyther when it is applyed for other men eyther quicke or deade dothe deserue forgyuenes of synnes neyther a culpa as they saye neyther yet a pena And the cleare and stronge probation of thys state is thys because it is impossible to obteyne remissioÌ„ of siÌ„nes for our owne worke by the vertue of the worke wrought but by fayth must the terrours of synne and of death be ouercomen when we comforte our hartes with the knowledge of Christe and thynke â–ª that we be forgyuen for Christê sake and that the merites and iustice of Christe be giuen vnto vs as Paule to the Romaynes sayth Iustificati ex fide pacem habemus that is to say Being iustified by saythe we haue peace â–ª These thinges be so vndoubted and so stronge and sure that they be able to stande agaynste al the gates of hell If we ought to haue sayde asmuch as nede is thaÌ„ is our cause alredy at an ende For no maÌ„ onles he be madde can allowe that pharisaicall hethen parsuasion of the worke wrought And yet this persuasion contynueth and stycketh faste among the people and this persuasion hathe encreased masses to infinite nombre For masses be hyred to appease the wrathe of god and by this worke they wyl obteyne remission a culpa et pena they wyll obteyne whatsoeuer they nede in all thys lyfe They wyl also delyuer deade men This pharisaicall opinion haue freers and sophisters taught in the churche Albeit we haue sufficiently declared our cause alredy yet that natwistaÌ„dyng because our aduersaries do wreste many scriptures folyshely to the defense of theyr errours we shal adde a fewe thynges to this place They haue spokeÌ„ many thynges of sacrifice in the confutation where as we in our confession purposely dyd eschue that name because of ambiguitie and doubtfull takyng of the worde We haue declared the thyng what these men do meane nowe by sacrifice whose abuses we do repreue and speake agaynste But nowe to the entent we may declare the scriptures wroÌ„gfully wrested it is necessary fyrste at the begynnynge to expoune what sacrifice is All these hole tenne yeres our aduersaries haue made almost infinite volumes of sacrifice And yet hathe none of them all hytherto put the diffinition of sacrifice All only they take the name of sacrifice eyther out of the scriptures â—rels out of the workes of the fathers That done they putte dreames of theyr owne ymagination as though sacrifice dyd betokeÌ„ whatsoeuer pleaseth them ⧠⧠What is sacrifice and whiche be the kyndes of sacrifice ⧠SOcrates in the worke of Plato entitled Phaedrus saythe that himselfe was moste desirous of distinctioÌ„s or diuisioÌ„s because without them nothynge can be declared by speakyng ne yet by vnderstanding And if he fouÌ„de any man connyng of diuiding him he sayeth he wayted vpon and folowed hys steppes as though he were a god And he byddeth hym that deuideth to cutte the membres and partê in the verie ioyntes leaste he brouse breake any membre after the fashyon of an euyl coke But these pÌ„ceptes our aduersaries do hyghly despyse and in very dede as Plato sayeth they be naughty cokes corruptyng the membres of sacrifice as it shal be perceyued when we shall reherse and recken vp the kyndes of sacrifice The diuines be wonte and that verie well to put a difference betwixt a sacramente and a sacrifice Let therfore ceremony or holy worke be Genus as the logiciane speaketh yâ— is to say the general terme vnto them bothe A sacrament is a ceremony or an holy worke in which god gyueth vnto vs that thing whiche the ê“myse annexed to the ceremony doth offre as baptisme is a worke nat whiche we offre vnto god but in whiche god dothe baptize vs that is to wete the minister in the stede of god and here god offereth and gyueth remission of siÌ„nes c. accordyng to his promise Qui crediderit baptizatus fuerit saluus erit who soeuer shall beleue be baptised shal be saued On the other syde a sacrifice is a ceremonie or a worke whiche we gyue vnto god to honour and worshyp him with all And there be two nerest kyndes of sacrifice â–ª and there be no mo The one kynde is called sacrificium propitiatorium whiche ye may cal in englysshe a sacrifice of raunsom that is to say a worke makyng satisfactioÌ„ bothe for the offence and the punyshement that is to say reconciling god or pacifieng the wrathe of god or whiche meriteth to other men remission of synnes The other kynde is sacrificium eucharisticon whiche in the englysshe tongue a man may cal a sacrifice of thankes gyuinge whiche deserueth nat forgyuenes of sinnes or reconciliation but is done of them that be reconciled to the entent to gyue thankes or to rendre thankes for remission of synnes and other benefites whiche they haue receyued of god These two kyndes of sacrifice we muste bothe in this controuersie and also in many other disputations haue alwayes in syght before our eyes and we wust with singular diligeÌ„ce take hede that they be nat coÌ„founded and mengled to gether That if the quantitie of this boke wold suffre it â–ª we wolde adde also the reasons of this our diuision For it hathe sufficient authorities and testimonies in the epistle of Paule to the Hebrues in other places And al the leuitical sacrificies may be reduced and brought to these membres as to theyr owne ê“pre houses For they were called in the lawe certayne propitiatorie sacrifices because of theyr signification or similitude â–ª and nat because they dyd merite remission of synnes before god but because they dyd merite remission of synnes as touchiÌ„g to the iustice of the lawe so that they for whom suche sacrifice were made shuld nat be excluded from this polecie or comen weale And therfore Holocaustum pro pâ—ccato and Holocaustum pro delicto that is to saye an hole brent sacrifice for synne and an hole brent sacrifice for a fault or offense these I say were called propiciatorie sacrificies But oblation libation retributioÌ„s fyrst frutes tenthes al these were called sacrificê Eucharistical that is to say sacrifices of thankê gyuyng But in very dede there was but onely one sacrifice propitiatorie in the worlde and that was the death of Christe as the epistle to the Hebrues teacheth whiche sayeth Impossibile est sanguine tauâ—orum et hircorum auferri peccata that is to say It is impossible that synnes shulde be taken away by the bloude of bulles and gotes And a lytle after he sayeth of the wyl of Christ. In whiche wyl we be santified by the oblation of the body of Iesu Christe ones for euer And Esaie interpretith the lawe to the entent that we shulde knowe the deathe of Christe to be verie satisfaction for our synnes or purgatioÌ„ nat the ceremonies of
determine vpon a perpetuall lyfe Another Canon grauntynge yet more libertie to the weakenes of man addeth mo yeres inhybityng a vowe to be made before the age of .xviii. yeres But whether of them so euer we folowe certes the moste parte hathe a very lawfull and iuste excuse why they shulde forsake theyr monasteries because they vowed before those ages Finally yea although the violacion and breakyng of the vowe coulde be reproued yet it shall nat forthwith folowe that the mariagê of suche persones as haue agaynst theyr vowe maried ought to be dissolued and broken For saint Augustine denyeth that they ought to be broken .27.9.1 capt Nuptiarum Whose auctorite is nat lyght I although other men afterwarde thought other wayes But though goddes commaundemente of mariage may be thought to delyuer many from theyr vowes yet our men bryng also another reason concernyng vowes that they be frustrate and vayne for euery honouryng of god ordeyned chosen of men without the coÌ„maundemente of god to deserue remission of synne and iustification is wycked as Christe sayth They honour me in vayne with coÌ„maundementes of men And Paule teacheth euery where that ryghtuousnes is nat to be sought of thobseruations and honours deuised by men but that it coÌ„mith by faythe to them that beleue that they haue god pacified and mercyfull through Christe nat for any our merites But clere hit is that monkes and freers haue taught that these fayned and made religious deserue remission of synnes and iustification and that they make amendes for synnes I pray you what thynge elles is this but to detracte and plucke awaye from the glorie of Christe and to darken yea to denye the ryghtuousnes of feythe Ergo yt folowith of necessâ—â—e that these accustomed and vsuall vowes be wycked honourynges of god wherfore they be vayne of none effecte For yâ— vowe which is wycked agaynst the coÌ„maundement of god is nothyng worthe for no vowe ought to be a bonde of wyckednes as the Canon it selue saieth Paule saieth ye be auoyded from Christe ye be fallen from grace whiche be iustified in the lawe that is to wytte they that thynke to deserue remission of synnes with theyr owne warkes and to please god for their owne fulfillyng of the lawe and whiche do nat fele that for Christe they frely take by feythe remission of synnes gyuen them by the mercy of god and that for Christe they please god these lose Christe for the truste due to Christe and to the promyse of god they remoue away applie to warkes Also they plede agaynst the wrathe of god nat Christe the mercy stocke but theyr owne warkes so that the honour due to Christ they apply to their warkes But it is clere that monkes and religious persons teache this I meane that they deserue remission of synnes with theyr obseruacions and that they haue god mercyfull vnto them for this cause Wherfore they teache men to trust in theyr warkes nat in the ê“piciacion mercyfulnes of Christe This truste is vngodly wycked and contrary to the gospell and in the iudgemente of god it shal be founde voyde for our workes may nat be pleded agaynste the wrathe and the iudgement of god The wrathe of god is mitigated and swaged only whan we conceyue and take by feythe the fre mercy promysed through Christ. Therfore they lose Christe whiche put theyr truste nat in Christ but in theyr owne warkes Furthermore the Monkes freers religious men dyd teache theyr kynde of lyuynge to be a state of ê‘fection because they kepte nat alouly the preceptes but also the counselles This errour is most repugnaunt to the gospell because they haue fayned them selues so to haue fulfylled the commaundementes that they no more also then they be bounden to And out of this hathe spronge an horrible errour in that they fayned themselues to haue merites of supererogation that is to say more then they were bounden to haue These merites they haue applied for other to be satisfactions for other mennes synnes These thynges if any man were disposed odiously to handle howe many thynges myght he reherse of whiche euen the religious ê‘sons â—hemselues be nowe asshamed Yt is no lyght sclaunder in the churche to purpose set forthe to the people any honourynge of god deuysed by men without the coÌ„maundemente of god and to teache that suche an honour dothe iustifie men make them ryghtuous For the ryghtuousnes of feythe iÌ„ Christ whiche chiefly ought to be taughte iÌ„ the church is thus obscured and darkened whyles these wonderfull angelicall religions as this fayned pouertie this cloked humilitie this hypocriticall chastite be caste before the eyes of men Furthermore the preceptes of god and the true honour of god be darkened obscured defaced whan men do heare that only Monkes freers chauoÌ„s and nunnes be in the state of ê‘fection For the very perfection of a christen man is an other thyng It is earnestly to dreade god and agayne to conceyue faythe and to truste that we haue god pacified contented for Christes sake to aske of god and surely to loke for helpe in all thynges that we haue to do accordyng to out callyng And iÌ„ the meane season to do good workes outwardly and to serue our vocacion In these thynges is the true perfection true honour of god and nat in the vnmaried lyfe or in beggynge or in vile fylthy cotes Also the people conceyue many noysome and perilous opinioÌ„s of those false praysinges of the Monkishe lyfe They heare chastite for so these religious persons â—al it praysed without measure therfore the people do leade theyr lyfe in mariage with offence and grefe of conscience They heare that only beggars be perfecte therfore they kepe possessions and occupy the worlde with an inwarde remorse of conscience They heare that it is a counsell of the gospell nat to auenge therfore priuate persones hearing this be nat affrayed to auenge for they heare that it is but a counsell and naâ— a coÌ„maundemente Other there be which iudge that al rule and ciuiâ—e offices be vnmete for christen men as though they coulde nat stande with good christian .ii. There be redde examples of men whiche forsakynge mariage and forsakyng the administration and rule of he comâ—n wealthe haue hydde themselues in abbeyes or monasteries and this called they to fle out of the worlde and â—o seke a kynde of lyuyng that shulde more please god Nether dyd they see that god ought to be serued in those precep es whiche he hym selfe dyd gyue and teache nat in coÌ„maundemeÌ„tes deuised by men It is a good and a ê‘fecte kynde of lyuyng whiche hathe the precepte of god for it It is necessary to admonishe warne men of these thing And before this tyme also Gerson rebuketh the errour of religious persons as touchynge perfeâ—â—ion and witnesseth that to say the monkisshe or religious lyfe to be a state of perfecâ—ion was
I haue many thynges to say to you but ye can nat yet beare them but when that spirite of veritie shall come he shall teache you all truthe They alledge also the example of the apostles whiche made a prohibition that the people shulde absteyne froÌ„ bloude and suffocate They alledge the Sabbat daye chaunged into Sunday contrary to the boke of the .x. coÌ„mauÌ„dementes called the Decalogie as it semeth Neyther is there any example more craked vpon and bosted then is the chaunging of â—he Sabbat daye Greate saye they is the power and auctoritie of the churche sythe it dispensed with one of the .x. commaundementes But as touchyng this question our men teache after this sorte that byshops haue no power to deâ—re and ordeyne any thynge agaynste the gospell as it is shewed before The canone lawes teache the same thynge .9 distinc But it is agaynst scripture to make traditioÌ„s or to exacte or require them to be obserued for th eÌ„tent that by that obseruation we may get pardon of synnes and maye satisfie and make amendes for synnes For thus the glorie of the merite of Christe is hurte and mynyshed whan we go aboute to deserue remission of synnes and iustification with suche obseruations Nowe it is openly knowen that traditions haue growen almoste to an infinite nombre in the churche by the meanes of that ê‘suasion and the doctrine of fayth ryghtuousnes of fayth in the meane whyle hath ben oppressed For styll more holy dayes and more were made and fastâ—â—ngdayes were coÌ„maunded newe ceremonies newe honourynges of sayntes were institute For the deuisers and auctors of suche thinges thought to gette remission of synnes â— iustification with these workes So grewe vppe the penitential canones in tymes passed of whiche yet we see certeyne tokens and steppes in satisfactions Also many wryters there be which fayne that in the newe testament there must be an honourynge of god lyke as that whiche we reade in Leuiticus the orderynge wherof god coÌ„mitted to the apostles and byshoppes And these writers seeme to be deceyued with thexample of Moyses lawe as though the ryghtuousnes of the newe testamente were an outwarde obseruation of certeyne rites ceremonies lyke as the iustice of the olde lawe was an outwarde obseruation of certeyne rytes Wherfore lyke as in the olde lawe it was synne to eate swynes flesshe c. So in the newe testament they putte synne in meates in dayes in vesture and semblable thyngê And they thynke that the ryghtuousnes of the newe testameÌ„t can not be with out these thinges Of this occasion came those burdens that certein meates do defile and pollute the conscience and that it is deadely synne to omitte and leaue vnsayde canonical houres that fastynges deserue remission of synnes and that they be necessarye to the ryghtuousnes of the newe testament that synne in a case reserued can not be forgyuen without thauctorite of the reseruer where as in very dede the canones them selues speake onelye of the reseruation of the canonical payne and not of the reseruation of synne From whens I pray you of whom haue the byshops theyr power and auctorite to laye these traditions vpon the churche to vexe or greue theyr coÌ„sciences For euery man may se open auctorities and clere testimonies whiche prohibite the makynge of suche traditions eyther to deserue remission of synnes or as necessarye to the ryghtuousnes of the newe testament or to saluacion Fyrst Paule to the Collossenses sayth Let no maÌ„ iudge you in meate drynke parte of the holy daye c. Also if ye be deade with Christe from the elementes of the worlde why as lyuyng in the worlde do ye kepe decrees touche not taste not c. whiche be coÌ„maundementes and doctrines of men and haue a presence and a colour of wysedome Also to Lite he prohibiteth traditions apertlye warâ—ynge that they be not attendynge to the Iuâ—aicall â—aâ—es and to coÌ„maundementes of men whiche turne from the truthe And Christ spekynge of them that require traditions sayth in this wyse Let them alone they are blynde guydes of the blynde and he improueth suche honours layinge All plantes whiche the father of heuen dyd not plante shal be plucked vp by the rootes It byshops haue auctoritie to one-rate and lade churches with infinite traditions and to snare the coÌ„sciences why doth scripture so often prohibete to make and to heare traditions why dothe it call them doctrines of deuyls Dyd the holy goost warne those thynges before in vayne wherfore it muste nedes consequently ensue that syth ordenaunces instituted as thynges necessary or with an opinion to deserue remission of synne be contrary to the gospell that it is not lauful for any byshop to institute or require suche honours For it is necessarye that the doctrine of christen libertie be kepte styll in the churches whiche is that the bondage of the lawe is not necessary to iustification as it is wryten in the epistle to the Galathians Be nat subiecâ—e agayne to the yoke of bondage The chiefe place of the gospell muste nedes be kepte styll whiche is that we obteyne remission of synnes and iustification freely by faythe in Christe and not for certeyne obseruations or honours deuysed by men What shall we thynke than of the Sonday and lyke rytes of the temples To this our lerned men saye that it is laufull to byshops or to pastors to make ordenaunces that thynges be ordrelye done in the Churche not that we shulde purchase by them remission of synnes or that we can satisfie for synnes or that consciences be bounde to iudge them necessary honours or to thinke that they synne whaÌ„ without offence of other they breake them So Paule doth ordeyne that in the congregation women shulde couer theyr heeddes and that interpreters and teachers be herde after an ordre in the churche It is conuenient that the churched shulde kepe suche ordenaunces for charitie and tranquilite so farre forthe that one offendeth not another that all thynges be done in the churches in ordre and without busynes and troubleâ— but yet so that the conscience be not charged as to thinke that they be necessary to saluation or to iudge that they synne whan they breake them without hurtynge of other As no man wyll saye that a woman doth synne whiche gothe forthe abrode bare heded offending no body therwith â–ª Euen suche is the obseruation and kepynge of the Sonday of Easter of Penthecoste lyke holydayes and rytes For they that iudge that by the auctorite of the churche the obseruynge of the Sonday in stede of the Sabbat day was ordeyned as a thyng necessary do greatly erre The scripture ê‘mitteth and grauÌ„teth that the kepynge of the Sabbat day is nowe free for it teacheth that the ceremonies of Moyses lawe after the reuelation and shewyng abrode of the gospell are not necessarye And yet because it was nedefull to ordeyne a certeyn day that the people myghte knowe whan
they oughte to come together it apperethe that the Churche dyd appoynte the Sonday whiche daye as it semeth pleased them rather than the Sabbat day euen for this cause that men myght haue an example of christen libertie myght knowe that the kepyng and thobseruation neyther of the saturday nor of any other day is necessary Prodigious monstruous wonderfull disputations are set forthe of the chaungynge of the lawe of the ceremonies of the newe lawe of the chaungynge of the Sabbat daye whiche all haue spronge forth of a false persuation and beleue of men whiche thought that there must nedes be in the churche an honourynge of god lyke to the leuiticall and that Christe coÌ„mitted to thapostles and to bysshops auctoritie to inuente and to fynde oute ceremonies whiche be necessarye to saluation These errours crepte in to the Churche whan the ryghtuousnes of faythe was not clearely ynough taught Some dispute that the kepyng of the Sonday is not merely and fully goddes lawe but in a maner and as it were of the law of god They prescribe of holy days howe far forthe it is laufull to worke Suche maner of disputations what other thynges be they but snares of consciences For although they busy them selues to modefye qualifie and fynde an epikee in theyr tradiditions temperynge the rygour of them with fauourable declarations yet notwithâ—tandynge as longe as the opinion that they are necessary dothe remayne whiche muste nedes remayne where ryghtuousnes of faythe and christen libertie are not knowen this epikee equitie and fauoure can neuer be perceyued ne knowen The Apostles coÌ„maunded to absteyne from bloudde who dothe nowe obserue and kepâ— it And yet they that do not kepe it synne not for vndoubtedly not the apostles them selues wold burden the conscience with suche bondage but they prohited it for a tyme for auoydynge of sclaunder For the perpetuall wyll and mynde of the gospell is to be consydered in a decree Scase any canones are kepte diligentelye and many daylye go oute of vse and memorye yea with them whiche defende traditions moste diligently Neyther can the coÌ„sciences be holpen ne prouided for onles this epikee or equitie be kepte that is to wytte that we knowe that canones and decrees are to be kepte without opinion of necessitie and that consciences are not hurte though traditions be forgotten and vtterly set asyde Certes bysshops myght easely kepe styll lauful obedience if they wolde nat inforce men to kepe traditions whiche can nat be kepte with good conscience They coÌ„maunde prestes to lyue vnmaried they receiue none onles they sweare in effecte that they wyll nat teache the pure doctrine of the gospel The congregations require nat that bysshops shulde repare and make concorde agayne with losse and decaye of theyr honour and yet it shulde become good pastours so to do but they only requyre that they wolde release and pardon vniuste burdones whiche are newe and receiued contrary to the custome of the catholyk churche We wyll nat denye but in the begynnyng some constitutions were grounded vpon reasonable and probable causes Whiche yet are nat nowe agreable ne coÌ„uenient for the tymes ensuyng It appereth also that some were by eâ—rour receyued Wherfore it myght apperteyne to the gentlenes of bysshoppes nowe to mitigate and release them sythe suche mâ—â—ation breaketh nat the vnite of the churche For many mannes traditions in processe of tyme haue ben chauÌ„ged as the caâ—ones them selues do shewe That if it can nat be obteyned that those obseruatioÌ„s shulde be released which can nat be done without synne we muste neades folowe the rule of the apostles whiche coÌ„maunde rather to obey god then men Peter forbiddeth bysshops to be lordes and emperours ouer the churche Nowe it is nat entended by vs to take away iurisdiction from the bysshops but this one thinge is required of them that they wolde suffre the gospell to be purely taught and that they wolde release a fewe certeyne obseruatioÌ„s whiche can not be obserued without synne That if they wyll not remitte ne release any thyng let them loke to theyr charge how they shal make accomptes to god in that they were occasion of this scisme and diuision by reason of theyr obstinacie and styffenes ⧠The conclusion of the boke ⧠THese be the chiefest articles which seme to be in controuersie and debate For al thoughe of moo abuses it myghte haue ben spoken yet because we wolde not be tedious ne longe we medled but with the mooste principall of whiche the rest may easely be iudged Greate compleyntes there were of pardons of pylgrymages of the abuse of excoÌ„munication parochâ—es were many wayes vexed by stationaries Infinite contentions stryfes there were betwyxte curates religious men for the ryght of the paryshe for confessions for buryalles for extraordinarie preachynges and for other thynges innumerable We haue lette these gere passe to th entent that the most principall poyntes of this matter shortely set forth myght be more easelye knowen Neyther is here any thynge sayde or gathered to the reproche sclauÌ„der or hurte of any man Allonly those thynges haue ben rehersed whiche semed necessarye to be spoken to th ende it myght be perceyued that nothyng is receyued in doctrine and ceremonies with vs agaynste scripture or the catholyke Churche For it is manifeste and knowen that we moste diligently take hede leste any newe or wycked opinions shulde creape in to our churches These articles before wryten we thought best to be exhibited and putte forthe accordynge to the coÌ„maundement of Themperours maiestie in whiche myght appere our coÌ„fession and the summe and effecte of theyr doctrine myghte be sene which be teachers preachers amoÌ„ge vs. Nowe if in any thynge this confession shall seme to be not perfecte and sufficient we be redy god wyllyng accordyng to the scriptures to rendre and gyue a larger information ⧠To the imperiall maiestie of Cesar the fyfte his faythfull and true subiectes IohnÌ„ Duke of Saxon elector George Marques of Brandenbrugh Ernest Duke of Lunebrugh Philip Landgraue of Hesse IohnÌ„ Friderike Duke of Saxon. Fraunces Duke of Lunebrugh Uolfgange Prince of Anhalt The Senate and counsell of Nurenberge The Senate of Rentlinge ⧠¶ Finis ⧠¶ The table ¶ The Epistle of the translatour to the ryght honorable mayster Thomas Crumwell â–ª Fo. 2 ¶ The preface to the Emperoure Charles the fyfthe Fo. eodem ¶ The fyrste article of the Trinite Fo. v. ¶ The .ii. article of Originall synne Fo. â—◠¶ The .3 arti of the humanitie of Christ. eod ¶ The .4 article of Iustification Fo. eod ¶ The .5 arti of the obteining of faythe eod ¶ The .6 article of frutes of faythe Fo. vii ¶ The .7 article of the holy churche Fo. eod ¶ The eyght article of the ministers of the churche Fo. eodem ¶ The .9 article of baptysme Fo. eod ¶ The .10 article of the sacrament of the Aulter Fo. viii ¶ The .11 article of confession Fo.
reason as ciuile workes and they fayne that reasoÌ„ without the holy ghost may loue god aboue al. For so long as mans mynde is ydle nor feleth nat the yre or iudgement of god it may feyne that it wyll loue god that it wyll do wele for god After this wyse they teache that men deserue remission of synnes by doyng that in them is that is to say if reason sorowyng for his syn fetcheth out an elicite acte as they cal it of the dilection of god or worketh wele for god And thê opinioÌ„ because naturally it flattereth men hath engeÌ„dered encreased many ceremonies in the churche vowes of monasticall lyuyng abuses of the Masse and euery daye more and more sum or other haue through this opinioÌ„ inuented newe cerimonies and rytes And to nouryshe and encreace the truste in such workes they haue affyrmed that god necessaryly geueth grace to suche workers by necessitie nat of coaction but of immutabilitie In thys opinion many greate and pernicious errours do stycke whiche to recount it were to longe Let the prudent reader only ponder thys if this be the cristian ryghtwysenes what diuersitie is betwyxt philosophie and the doctryne of Christe If we deserue remission of synnes by these elicite actes what neded Christe or regeneracyon And throughe these opinions the thyng is nowe ronne so farre that many do scorne vs bycause we teache that another iustice is to be sought besyde the philosophicall iustyce we haue herde some in the pulpyt settyng apart the gospell preache Aristotles Morals Nor they dyd nat amys if it be trewe that the aduersaries defende For Aristotle of the ciuile manners hath wryten so excelleÌ„tly that he can nat be amended we se bokes putte forth in whiche be conferred certayne sayngê of Christ with the sayengê of Socrates Zeno and of other as though Christe cam for thys purpose to teache vs certayne lawes by whiche we myght deserue remyssioÌ„ of synnes and nat receyue it frely through his merites wherfore if we allowe here the doctrine of the aduersaries that we deserue by the workê of reason remyssyon of synnes and iustificacyon there shal be then no difference betwixt the iustice of the philosophers or at leaste of the pharisees and the Christian iustice And albeit the aduersaries because they wyll nat clene put Christ out of theyr bokes requyre the knowledge of the historie of Christe and attrybute vnto it yâ— it doth merite vnto vs acertayne habite or as they them selues call it the fyrste grace whiche they vnderstande to be an habite inclynynge vs to loue god the easylyar yet very lytle it is that they attribute vnto this habite for they fayne that the actes of â—ylle is bothe before that habite and after of al one sorte They fayne that the wyl may loue god but yet that habite styrreth it to do the same more freely And they byd vs purchase thys habite fyrste by precedent merites and after they byd vs purchase by the workê of the law an increase of that habite lyfe euerlastinge Thus they bury Christe that men shulde nat vse hym for a medyatour nor thynke that for him they receyue frely remissioÌ„ of synnes and recoÌ„ciliacyon but dreame that by theyr owne fulfyllyng of the lawe they be reputed iust before god where as in dede the lawe is neuer satisfied sythe reason dothe nothyng but certayne ciuile workes and the whyles neyther feareth god nor beleueth truly that god careth for him And although they speake of that habite yet without the iustice of faythe the loue of god can neyther be in men nor it can nat be vnderstande what it is And where as they fayne a differeÌ„ce betwixte Meritum congrui and Meritum coÌ„digni they do but daly because they wolde nat seme openly to play the PelagiaÌ„s For if god necessarily gyueth grace pro merito congrui so is there nat Meritum condigni Howbeit they wote nat what they saye After the habite of loue obteyned they fayne that man dothe merite de condigno And yet they byd vs doubte whether we haue that habite or no. Howe do they then knowe whether they merite de congruo or de coÌ„digno But all this thiÌ„g is fayned of ydle felowes whiche knowe nat howe remission of synnes is atteyned howe in the iudgemeÌ„t of god and in the affrayes of conscience the truste of workes is plucked from vs. Careles hypocrites alwayes iudge that they merite de condigno whether they haue that habite or nat For naturally men truste to theyr owne propre ryghtwysenes but the affrayed and troubled conscience wauereth and doubteth and euermore seketh and hepeth vp other workes to the entente it maye be quyeâ— Thys troubeled conscyence neuer feleth that it meriteth De condigno but runneth in to despayre onles it heareth besyde the doctryne of the lawe the Euangell of free remission and of the iustice of faythe Thus the aduersaries teache nothiÌ„g but the iustice of reason or at leaste of the lawe vpon whiche they loke euen as the Iewes dyd vpoÌ„ the couered face of Moses and in these careles hypocrites whiche thynke them selues to satisfye the lawe they kyndle a presumpcyon and vayne truste of workes and a coÌ„tempte of the grace of Christe On the contrary parte they dryue the feareful coÌ„sciencies in to desperacion whiche sythe they worke with doubtyng can haue no experience of faythe nor of the vertue therof thus at laste they vtterlye despayre But thys is our opinion of the iustyce of reason that god requyreth it and that for the commauÌ„dement of god honest workes are necessarely to be done whiche the Decalogie commaundeth accordynge to Paules saynge the law is a tutour Also the lawe is geuen to the vngodly For god wyl that the carnal persons be kept within the boundes by thys discipline and to the mayntenaunce of thys he hathe geuen lawes letters doctryne rulers punyshmentes And thys iustyce maye reason after a maner perfourme of the owne proper powers although ofteÌ„tymes it is ouer ceptes of the seconde table whiche conteyne cyuile iustyce whiche reason vnderstandeth And coÌ„tented herewith they thinke that they satysfye the lawe of god In the meane whyle they se nat the fyrste table whiche commaundeth vs to loue god to beleue verely that god is dyspleased with synne and truly to dreade god and to thynke surely that god hereth vs. But mans mynd without the holy gost eyther retchlesly despyseth the iudgement of god or in payne fleethe hateth god his iudge wherfore it obeyeth not the fyrste table when then in mans nature stycketh the contempt of god and the doubtynge of goddes worde and of hys threatnynges and promyses men in dede do syn ye wheÌ„ they do honest workes without the holye gooste bycause they do them with a wycked harte accordynge to thys sayeng of Paule ☞ what so euer is not of faythe is synne ☜ For such do worke with contempt of god lyke as Epicure thiÌ„keth not that god careth for him regardeth him or heareth
him Thys coÌ„tempt doth marre al theyr good workes for god iudgeth the harte Finally this is very vnaduysedly wrytten of our aduersaryes that men gyltye of eternall punyshement deserue remyssyon of synnes by the acte of loue sythe it is not possyble to loue god onles we fyrste purchase forgiuenes of sinnes by fayth for it is ympossyble for an harte whiche in dede felethe the ire of god to loue god before he perceyue hym pacyfyed I saye so longe as god feareth vs and semeth to cast vs froÌ„ hym into eternall dethe mans nature can not lyfte vp it selfe to loue the angrye iuge punysher It is easye for euyll persons to fayne these dreames of loue that a mortall synner maye loue god aboue all thynges for they fele not what is the ire or iudgemente of god But in the trouble of conscyence and in the very conflycte there the conscyence proue howe false theyr phylosophycal conclusyons be Paule saythe ☞ The lawe workethe anger ☜ he saythe not that by the lawe men deserue remyssyon of synnes for the lawe alwaye accuseth the conscyence and put it in feare Ergo it iustifyeth not for the coÌ„science terrified by the lawe fleeth the iudgement of god wherefore they erre that truste to wynne remyssyon of synnes be the workes of the lawe Thys suffyseth of the iustyce of reasoÌ„ or lawe which the aduersaries teache for here after when we shall shewe our mynde of the iustyce of fayth â–ª the matter it selfe shal constrayne vs to bryng out more recordes whiche maye also helpe to destroye the erroures of our aduersaryes here to fore aledged Bycause therfore that men can not by theyr owne powers do the lawe of god and bycause all be vnder synne and condemned to euerlastynge dethe for thys cause we can not be delyuered from syn by the lawe nor be iustyfyed but the promyse of remissyon of synnes and of iustyfycatyon is geuen for Chryst who is geuen for vs to satysfy for the synnes of the worlde and is set vp as a medyator and a pourger of sinnes This promyse hathe no condycyon annexed of our merites but freely offereth forgyuenes of synnes and iustyfycatyon as Paule sayth ☞ Yf by workes Ergo it is no grace ☜ And in an other plase ☞ The iustyce of god is nowe declared without the lawe ☜ that is remyssyon of synnes shulde hange on our merytes and the reconciliation shuld be by the lawe so it were vnprofytable for we can not do the lawe it shulde also ensue that the promyse of reconcilement shuld neuer chaunce vnto vs. Thus reasoneth Paule Rom. 4. ☞ Yf our enherytaunce shuld cum by the lawe voyde were our fayth and the promyse were of none effecte For yf the promyse shulde requyre a condycyon annexed of our merytes and of the lawe syth we neuer fulfyll the lawe it shulde folowe that the promyse were vnprofytable But syth it is so â–ª that iustyfycatyon chaungeth by free promyse it foloweth that we can not iustyfye our selues For otherwyse what neded god to promise And where as the promyse caÌ„ not be taken without fayth the gospell which is properly the promyse of remyssyon of synnes and of iustyfycatyon for Chryst teacheth the iustyce of fayth which the lawe doth not Nor it is not the iustyce of the lawe For the lawe requyreth of vs our workes and our perfection but the promyse offereth vnto vs whiche be oppressed with synne and deathe frelye reconciliacyon for Chryste which reconciliatyon is receyued not by workes but by onely fayth This fayth bryngeth not with it a trust of the owne workes but onely the trust of promyse or of the promysed mercye in Chryste wherfore thys specyall fayth by which we beleue that our synnes be forgyuen for Chryste and that god is pacyfyed and mercyfull for Chryste obteyneth remyssyon of synnes and iustifyeth vs and by cause in repentaunce that is in the trouble of conscyence it comforteth and plucketh vp our hartes and regenerateth vs and bryngeth vnto vs the holye spirite so that from thenseforth â—e maye do the lawe of god that is loue God feare God thynke that god heareth vs obey god in all afflyctyons it mortyfyeth the coÌ„cupiscence c. Thus fayth whiche freely receyueth remyssyon of sinnes bycause it pleadeth Chryst in estopell agaynst the ire of god as a mediator and mercy stocke pleadeth not in barr our owne merytes or our owne loue which fayth is the true knowledge of Chryste and vseth the benyfytes of Chryst and regenerateth our hartes and goeth before the fulfyllynge of the lawe Of thys fayth ye shall not fynde one syllable in the doctrine of our aduersaryes wherfore we reproue the aduersaryes bycause they only teach the iustyce of the lawe and teach not the iustyce of the Euaungell which preacheth vnto vs the iustyce of faythe in Chryste ⧠What is the iustyfyenge faythe THe aduersaries only fayne that fayth is a knowledge of the hystorye and therfore they teache that it may stonde with mortall syn They speake therfore nothiÌ„ge of fayth by which Paule so oft tymes saythe that men be iustyfyed for they whiche be reputed iust before god walke nat in mortal synne But that fayth whiche iustyfyeth is nat only a knoweledge of the hystorye but it is to assent to the promyse of God in whiche frelye for Chryste is offered remyssyon of synnes iustificacyon And lest a man shulde suspecte that it is only a knowledge we wyl adde more ouer that it is to wyll and to receyue the offered promyse of remyssyon of synnes and of iustification And a man maye easely se the diuersytye betwyxte this fayth and betwyxt the iustyce of the lawe Fayth is a seruice which receiueth of god the offered benifites The iustyce of the lawe is a seruyce which offereth vnto god our merites with fayth on thê fashyon wyll god be serued that we maye receyue of hym the thynges whiche he promyseth and offereth Nowe that fayth sygnifieth not only the knowledge of the hystorye but rather a trust which assenteth to the promise Paule clerely wytnesseth when he sayth Iustyce therfore is by fayth to thentente the promyse shulde be ferme and stable For he meaneth that the promyse caÌ„ not be receyued but by fayth wherfore he compareth and knytteth together as correlatiues promyse and fayth Howe be it it is sone iudged what faythe is yf we consyder the Crede where this artycle is put Remission of synnes wherefore it is not ynoughe to beleue that Chryste was borne dyd suffer and ryse agayne oneles we adde also thys artycle Remyssyon of synnes whiche is the fynal cause of the hystorye To thys artycle we muste refere the reste as that for Chryste and nat for our owne merites we be pardoned of our synnes For what neded Chryste to begyuen for our synnes if our owne merytes maye satysfye for our synnes ⧠wherfore so ofte as we speake of the iustyfyenge faythe it is to be knowen that these .3 obiectes muste mete together
promyse that free and the merytes of Chryst as a raunsom and redeÌ„ption Promyse is receiued by fayth this worde fre excludeth our merites signyfyeth that only by mercye is offered the benefyte of Chryst the merytes be the rauÌ„som for there must be some certaine redeÌ„pcion for our siÌ„nes The scripture oft times cryeth for mercy And the holy fathers many tymes say that we be saued by mercy So oft then as mencioÌ„ is made of mercy it is to be knoweÌ„ that fayth is ther requyred which receiueth the ê“mise of mercy And agayn so oft as we speke of faith we wyll that the obiecte be vnderstaÌ„de that is to say the promised mercy For faith doth not therfore iustify or saue because it is of it selfe a worthy worke but only because it receyueth the mercy promysed And thê seruice thêlatria is most highly coÌ„mended in prophetes psalmes wher as the law teacheth not fre remissioÌ„ of sinnes But the fathers knowe the promyse made of Christ that God for Christ wolde remyt synnes wherfore when they vnderstode that Chryst shuld be a pryce and raunsome for our synnes they knewe that our workes were not a raunsome of so great a thyng Therfore they receiued by fayth fre mercy and remissyoÌ„ of siÌ„nes lyke as the holy fathers of the newe testament do Here vnto belong tho oft repetycyons of mercye and faythe in the psalmes and prophetes as here Si iniquitates obseruaueris domine c. Yf thou markest iniquities o lorde lorde who shall susteyne Here he coÌ„fesseth hys synnes and yet he alledgeth not hê merytes He addeth For with the is mercyfulnes Here he lyfteth vp him selfe with the truste of the mercye of God And cytethe the promyse Sustinuit anima mea in verbo eius sperauit anima mea in domino My soule is susteyned in hys worde my soule hathe trusted in the lorde that is to saye because thou haste promysed remyssyon of synnes by thys thy promyse I am susteyned And Paule cyteth the hystorye of Abraham Abraham beleued God and it was recompted vnto hym for ryghtwysnes That is to wytte Abraham perceyued that God was vnto hym mercyful only for hys promyse sake He assented to the promyse of God nor suffered not hym selfe to be plucked away frome it all thoughe he sawe hym selfe vnclene and vnworthye He perceyued that God performeth hys promyse for hê owne truthe and not for our workes or merytes Trulye the affrayed hartes can haue no rest if they shulde thynke that for theyr owne workes or owne loue or fulfylliÌ„ge of the lawe they shulde please God for in the fleshe stycketh synne whiche alwaye accuseth vs. But then the hartes haue rest wheÌ„ in such affrayes they assure them selues that we therfore please God be cause he hathe promysed and that God perfourmeth hys promyse for hys owne truthe and not for our worthynes Thus Abraham herde thys saynge Feare thou not for â–ª I am thy protector Here he raysed vp him selfe and felte God mercyful vnto him not for hys owne deseruynge but because the promyse of god must nedes be iuged true this faythe therfore is imputed to hym for ryghtwysnes that is because he assenteth to the promyse and taketh the offered reconsilement he is nowe truelye iuste and accepted vnto God not for hys owne workes but bycause he taketh the free promyse of god Thys auctoryte of Genyses pleased Paule not without cause we se howe he layth on howe ernestlye he taryeth vpon that poynte because he sawe that the nature of fayth myght in that poynt be easaly espyed He sawe that the recorde of the imputacyon of iustice was added not with out a greate skyll He sawe that the lawde of desernynge iustyfycacyon and of pacyfyenge the conscyence was taken away from workes â–ª when Abraham is therfore pronounced ryght wyse because he assenteth to the promyse and taketh the offered reconcilement he pleadeth not in barre of goddes ire hys owne merytes or workes wherfore thys place dylygently consydered may plenteouslye instructe godlye myndes in thys matter whiche shall so be vnderstonde yf the affrayed myndes haue it before them and assure theÌ„ selue that they ought to assente to the free promyse For otherwyse they can not be quyete onles they presuppose that they haue god theyr good lorde because he hath so promysed and not bycause our nature lyfe and workes be worthye Therfore also the fathers were iustifyed not by the law but by the promyse and fayth And it is a wonderfull thynge that the aduersaryes do make so lytle of faythe syth they se it throughe out al scrypture praysed for the moste hyghe seruyce as in the .49 Psal. Call on me in tyme of trybulacyon and I shal delyuer the. Thus wyll god be knowen thus he wyll be worshyped by receyuynge benefytes of hym and receyuynge them for hys mercyes sake and not for our owne demerytes Thys is the moste ample consolacyon in all afflyctyons And such consolacyons our aduersaryes go about to destroye and putte out of vre in that they make faythe so lytle a seruyce and onlye â—eache men to contende with god by our owne workes and merytes ¶ That the only faythe in Chryst iustyfyeth FYrste leste a man wolde thynke that we speake of the ydle knowledge of the Hystorye we wyll shewe howe faythe cummeth After we wyl shewe that it iustyfyeth and howe thys must be vnderstande then we wyll assoyle thobiections of the aduersaryes Chryste in the last of Luke coÌ„maundeth his dyscyples to preache repentaunce in hys name and remyssyon of synnes For the gospell argueth euery man to be vnder synne and to be gyltye of eternal ire and deth and offereth for Chryst remissyon of sinnes iustificacion which is receyued by fayth Preaching of penauÌ„ce which reproueth vs dothe fray the conscyence with true ernest afrayes In these the hartê ought agayne to conceyue consolacyon which shal be yf they trust to the promyse of Chryst that for hym we haue remyssyon of synnes Thys faythe erectyng and comfortynge vs in those affrayes takethe remyssyon of synnes iustyfyeth and viuifyeth For that consolacion is a newe and a spiritual lyfe These be plaine and open and the godlye maye vnderstande them also the churche haue recorded the same The aduersaryes neuer shewe truly howe the holye gost is gyuen They fayne that the sacramentes gyue the holye gooste ex opere operato sine bono motu accipientis euen of the verye worke it selfe without any good motyon of the receyuer as thoughe the geuynge of the holy goste were an idle thynge But where as we speake of suche faythe whiche is not an idle thought but which deliuereth from dethe and createth a newe lyfe in our hartes and nedeth the holy gost it standeth not with mortall synne but so longe as it is present it bryngeth forthe good frures as we shall say here after what can be spoken of the conuertynge of the vngodly or of the maner of regeneratynge more sympely and more
clearly There be an infinite sort of commentours vpon the master of the seÌ„tence let our aduersaryes brynge forthe but one coÌ„mentarye of them al whiche speke any thynge of the maner of regeneratynge When they speake of the habyte of loue they fayne that men deserue the holy gooste by theyr workes they teache not that it is receyued by the worde euen as the Anabaptystes do at thys day But we can nat haue to do with god god wyl nat be caught but by hê worde Therfore iustyfycacyon is hade by the worde as Paule sayth The Euaungell is the power of god to the helth of euery beleuer Also Fayth is of hearynge A man myght also out of thys place gather an argumeÌ„t that fayth iustifieth for yf iustyfycacyon is only by the worde and the worde is only receyued by faythe it foloweth that faythe iustyfyeth But there be greter reasons Thys haue we spoken to th ende to shewe the fourme and maner of regeneracyon and that it maye be vnderstonde what maner of thynge fayth is wherof we speke Nowe we wyl shewe that faythe iustyfyeth whÌ„ere fyrste of all the reders muste be admonyshed that as it is necessarye to maynteyne thys opinyon that Christe is our medyatour so is it necessarye to defende that fayth iustyfyeth For howe shall Chryste be a medyator yf in iustyfycacyon we vse not hym as a medyator yf we thynke not that for hym we be reputed ryghtwyse And that it is to beleue and truste to the merytes of Chryste that for hiÌ„ god wyl surely be pacified with vs. Also as we must defende that besyde the lawe the promyse of Chryste is necessarye so we muste defende that faythe iustyfyeth for the lawe teacheth not free remyssyon of siÌ„nes Moreouer the lawe can not be fulfylled onles we fyrste receyue the holy goste wherfore it is nedeful to defende that the promyse of Chryste is necessarye But thys promyse can nat be taken but by faythe Ergo they whiche denye that faythe iustyfyeth do nothynge but teache the lawe disanullynge the gospell and dysanullynge Chryste But some perchauns when it is sayde that faythe iustyfyeth vnderstondeth it of the begynnynge that fayth shulde be the begynnynge of iustificatyon or a preperatyue to iustyfycacyon so that it is not the verye faythe whiche maketh vs acceptable to god but the workes whiche folowe And they dreame that fayth is so hyghly commeÌ„ded because it is the begynnynge For the begynnynge of â— thynge is greatlye estemed and therfore it is commenly sayde Principium dimidium totius The begynnynge is halfe of the hole As yf a man wolde saye that gramer maketh the doctours of euery scyence because it is a preperatyue to other scyencies But we meane not thus of faythe but we defende that properly and truely by fayth we be for Chryste reputed ryghtwyse or accepted to God And because thys worde iustify cari to be iustyfyed sygnyfyeth to be made of iniuste iuste it sygnyfyeth also to be pronunced or reputed ryghtwyse For scrypture speketh in bothe wyses Therfore fyrste we wyl shewe that onlye faythe maketh of vnryghtwyse ryghtwyse that is to wytte receyueth remyssyon of siÌ„nes Sum men be offended with thys pertycle sola onely where as neuertheles Paule saythe we iudge that man is iustyfyed by faythe and nat of workes Also to the Ephesyans the seconde It is the gyfte of god not of vs neyther of our workes leste any man shulde glorye Also Roma 3. Freelye iustyfyed If the exclusyue sola dothe dysplease them let that them take from Paule also these exclusyues freely not of workes It is a gyfte And suche lyke for these be also exclusyues Doutles we exclude the opinyon of meryte but we exclude not the worde of God or the sacramentes as our aduersaryes do mysreporte vs. For we sayde before that fayth is conceiued by the herynge of the worde And we extolle most cheflye the mynysterye of the worde Loue also and workê ought to folowe fayth wherfore they be not so excluded that they shulde not folowe but the trustyng of meryte of loue and workes is excluded in iustyfycacyon And that we shall euedently shewe ⧠That remyssion of synnes is by the only fayth in Christe obteyned ⧠WE thynke that the aduersaries wyll also graunt that in iustificacyon is fyrst necessarie remission of synnes For we be al vnder synne Then this shal be my argument ⧠To obtayne remission of sinnes is to be iustified accordyng to this Beati quorum remisse sunt iniquitates Blessed be they whose synnes be remitted But so it is yâ— by the only fayth in Christ nat by loue or for loue or workê we obtayne remission of siÌ„nes although the loue foloweth fayth Ergo by only fayth we be iustified vnderstandyng iustificacioÌ„ to be of the vnryghtwyse to be made ryghtwyse or to be regenerate The minor may easely be declared if we know howe remission of synnes is obtayned The aduersaries do full coldly dispute whether remission of synnes and the infusion of grace be all one mutation yea or no. The ydle persoÌ„s had nothynge els to speake In remission of synnes is required that the feare of synne and of euerlastyng death be vaynquyshed in mens hertê as Paule witnesseth 1. CorÌ„ 15. The dart of death is syn And the power of syn is the lawe But thankes be to god who gyueth to vs victory through our lorde Iesus Christ that is to say synne frayeth the conscience and this is done by the lawe whiche sheweth they re of god agaynst synne but we ouercum by Christ. Howe through fayth wheÌ„ we lyfte vp our selues through truste of hys promysed mercye for Christe wherfore our Minor we proue thus ⧠⧠The yre of god can nat be pacified if we laye agaynst it our workes because Christe is propowned our mercy stocke so that for hym the father shulde be pacified with vs. But Christ can nat be receyued a mediatour but by fayth Ergo by only fayth we purchase remission of synnes when we lyfte vp our hertes with the truste of the promysed mercie for Christ. Also Paule to the Rom. the .5 chapi saythe By hym we haue a passage to the father addeth through faythe we be thus then reconcyled to the father and receiue remission of synnes wheÌ„ we lyfte vp our selues with the hope of the promysed mercy for Christ. The aduersaries do so vnderstande Christ to be a mediatour and propiciatour because we deserue the habite of loue they byd vs nat vse hym as a mediatour nowe but they vtterly bury Christe feynyng that we haue thê passage by our owne workes and that by them we deserue thys habite of loue as they call it and that after by loue we haue peace of conscience Is nat this vtterly to bury Christe and to plucke downe the hole doctryne of fayth Paule contraryly teacheth vs to haue passage that is to say peace by Christe And to shewe vs howe thys is he addeth that we haue passage
through faythe Ergo by fayth in Christe we receyue remissioÌ„ of synnes and we can nat lay agaynste the yre of god our loue and our workes Secondly It is certayne yâ— synnes be remitted because of Christ our mercystocke 〈◊〉 whoÌ„ god hath ordeined to be a mercistocke And Paule addeth through faythe wher fore this mercystocke shal ayde vs if by fayth we stycke to the mercy promysed in hym and plede it in arreste of the iudgement and yre of god And to this purpose it is wrytten ad Hebreos .4 hauiÌ„g a byshope cÌ„ let vs approche with truste He byddeth vs approche to god nat by trust of our owne meritê but by trust of our byshop Christe Ergo he requyreth fayth Thyrdly Peter in the actê cap. x. sayeth thus To hym al the prophetes bere wytnes that all whiche beleue in him receyue remission of synnes through hys name Howe myght he speke it more clearly we receyue he sayteh remission of synnes throughe hys name that is to say for his sake Ergo nat for our merites nat for our contricion attricion loue ceremonies workes And he addeth that beleue in hym Ergo he requyreth fayth For we caÌ„ nat cleaue to the name of Christ but by fayth Furthermore he alledgeth the coÌ„sent of al the prophetes This is truly to allege the authoritie of the church But of this place we shal speake here after in the tytle of penaunce Fourthly RemissioÌ„ of synnes is a thyng promised for Christ. Ergo it can nat be receyued but by fayth only For the promyse can nat be receyued but by only fayth RomÌ„ 4. Therfore is it by fayth to the ende it may be a sure promyse hangyng vpon grace as who shuld say If the matter shulde hange vpon our merites the promyse were vncertayne and vnprofitable because we can neuer determyne when we haue merited ynoughe And that the assayed conscience vnderstande ryght wele Therfore Paule sayth Galat. 3. God hath concluded all thyngê vnder synne that the promise through the faythe of Iesu Christe myght be gyuen to the beleuers Here he plucketh away merite froÌ„ vs because he sayeth that all be gylty and concluded vnder synne then he addeth that the promyse meanyng of remission of synnes and iustificacion is gyuen and telleth howe the promysse may be receyued that is to say by faythe And thys reason taken out of the nature of promysse is moste chief with Paule ofte repeted Nor there can nat be any thyng inueÌ„ted or feined to auoyde this argument of Paule wherfore let nat godly myndes suffre them selues to be dryuen from thys opinion that by onely faythe we receyue remission for Christ. For in this they haue a sure and ferme coÌ„solacion agaynst the terrours of synne and agaynst euerlastyng death and agaynst all the gates of helle And syth by only faythe we receyue remission of synnes and reconciliacion for Christe ergo only fayth iustifieth because the reconciled be reputed ryghtwyse and the chyldern of god nat for theyr owne clennes â–ª but through mercy for Christ if so be that we cleaue to thys mercye by fayth and therfore the scripture recordeth that by faythe we be reputed ryghwyse we wyll adde therfore authorities fyrste of scripture theÌ„ of doctours that shal clearely testifye that onely fayth is the very iustice by whiche we be reputed iuste before god that is to say nat because it is a worke worthy of it selfe but because it receyueth the promisse by whiche god hath promised that for Christ he wyll be mercifull to the beleuers in him or be cause it beleueth that Christe is made for vs by god a wysdom iustice sanctificacion and redempcion Paule in the epystle to the Romanes disputeth principally of thê place and propouneth that we be frely iustified by fayth if we beleue that god is pacified with vs for Christe And in the thyrde chapitre he bryngeth in this proposicion whiche conteyneth the sum of his hole disputacion Arbitramur igitur hominem fide iustificari non ex operibus legis .i. we iudge therfore that maÌ„ is iustified by â—ayth and nat by the workes of the lawe Here the aduersaries do iÌ„terprete the workê of the lawe to be the Leuitical ceremonies But Paule nat only speketh of the ceremonies but of the hole lawe For he alledgeth a litle after forth of the Decalogie Non concupisces .i. thou shalte nat couet Moreouer if the morall workê myght deserue remission of synnes and iustificacion then neded nat Christe nor the promise then all were to no purpose that Paule speketh of promyse He shulde wryte also amys to the Ephesians that we be saued frely and that it is a gyfte of god and procedeth nat of workê Also Paule alledgeth Abraham he alledgeth Dauid But these had a coÌ„mauÌ„dement of god of circumcision wherfore if any workes iustifyed it was necessary that tho workes whiche then were commaunded shulde haue iustifyed But Austyne doth ryghtly teache that Paule spake of the hole lawe as he disputeth copiously in his boke de spiritu litera where at last he sayeth thus His igitur coÌ„sideratis pertractatisâ—â— pro viribus quas dominus donare dignatur colligimê° non iustificare â—ominem preceptis bone vite nisi per fidem Iesa Christi .i. These therfore consydered and handled accordyng to the power whiche god vouchsaueth to gyue vs we gather that man is nat iustifyed by the preceptes of good lyfe but by faythe of Iesu Christe And leaste we shulde thynke that this sentence fell from Paule vnwares that fayth iustifieth he mainteyneth and confyrmeth it with a longe disputacyon in the fourthe chapitre to the Rom. And after he repeteth it in all the epystles In the .4 chap. to the Romanes he sayeth thus Operanti merces non imputatur secundum graciâ— sed secundum debitum Ei autem qui non operatur credit autem in eum qui iustificat impium reputatur fides eius ad iusticiam .i. To him that worketh is geueÌ„ a rewarde nat of fauour but of dutie CoÌ„trary wyse to him that worketh nat but trusteth on hym that iustifieth the wycked hys beleue is accompted for ryghtwysnes Here he clerely pronounceth that very faythe is accompted for ryghtwysenes Faythe then is the thynge whiche god pronounceth to be ryghtwysnes and he addeth that it is frely imputed And he denieth that it can be frely imputed if it shuld be due for workes Ergo he also excluded the merite of morall workes For if to these were due the iustifycacion before god faythe shuld nat be accompted ryghwysenes without workes And after he sayeth â–ª For we saye that fayth was iÌ„puted to AbrahaÌ„ for ryghtwysnes In the fyfthe chapitre he sayeth Iustifyed by fayth we haue peace towarde god .i. we haue quyet and glad consciences before god Roma 10. with the harte it is beleued for ryghtwysnes Here he pronounceth faythe to be the iustice of the harte Gal. 2. Nos in Christo hesu credimê° vt
their hartes wherfore after that by faith we be iustified and renewed we begyn to feare god to loue god to craue loke after socoure of god to gyue thankes vnto hym to preache hym and to obeye him in afflictions we begyn also to loue our neybours because our hartes haue spiritual and holy mocions These thinges can not be done onles after that we be iustified by fayth and regenerate we receyue the holye goste fyrste because the lawe can not be done without christe also the lawe can nat be done without the holye goste But the holye goste is receyued by faythe accordinge to the saynge of Paule That we may receyue the promyse of the spirite by faythe Also howe can mans harte loue god so longe as he feleth hym greuously dyspleased with vs and to oppresse vs with temporall and perpetuall calamities but the lawe alwayes accuseth vs alwayes sheweth that god is angry God therfore is not loued vntyl we haue receyued mercy by fayth So at laste is made an amiable obiect Althoughe therfore cyuyle workes that is to saye thexterne workes of the lawe without Chryste and with out the holy gost may be in some parte done â–ª yet it appereth by that which we haue sayde that the thinges which be properlye apperteynynge to the diuyne lawe I meane thaffectyons of the harte towarde god whiche be commaunded in the fyrste table can nat be done without the holye goste But our aduersaryes be plesaunt diuynes They beholde the seconde table and the polityke workes but the fyrst table they nothinge regarde as though it pertayned nothynge to the purpose or at lest waye they requyre only externe workes That eternall lawe and farre put aboue the sence and vnderstandynge of al creatures whiche is Thou shalte loue thy lorde God with all thy harte they vtterly not consyder But Chryste was for thys ende gyuen vnto vs that for him remission of synnes the holy gost shulde be graunted vs which myght create in vs a newe and euerlastynge lyfe and an euerlastynge ryghtwysnes which myght fyrste of al shewe vnto vs Chryst as it is wrytten He shall notirize me for of myne he shal take and shewe it vnto you And after brynge also other giftes as loue inuocation thankes gyuynge chastitye pacyence cÌ„ wherfore the lawe can not be truely perfourmed onles we fyrste receyue the holy goste by faythe Therfore Paule saythe that by faythe the lawe is establyshed and not abrogate or auoyded For then or els neuer is the lawe fulfylled when the holy gost is in that man And Paule teacheth that the vayle with whiche the face of Moyses was muffled can nat be take awaye but by fayth in Chryste by which is receyued the holy gost For thus he sayth But vntyll thys daye when Moyses is red the vayle is put ouer theyr hartes But when they shal be conuerted to God the vayle shall be take awaye The lorde is a spirite and where the spirite of the lorde is there is lybertye By the vayle vnderstaÌ„deth Paule an humane opinion of the hole lawe of the Decalogie and ceremonyes that is to saye that hypocrites do thynke that externe and ciuile workes do satysfye the lawe of god and that sacryficies and ceremonies euen of them selfe do iustyfye before god But then thys vayle is plucked from vs that is to say this errour is taken away when god sheweth to our hartes our vncleÌ„nes and greatnes of synne There fyrst we se our selues to be farre from the fulfyllynge of the lawe There we acknoweledge howe that the fleshe beinge idle and careles feareth not god not thynketh verely that god regardeth vs but that we be casually borne and vanyshe away lyke brute bestes There we fynde thexperyence that we beleue not that god forgyueth vs and heareth vs but when we hearynge thevangell and forgyuenes of synnes begynne to lyfte vp our selues by faythe we conceyue the holy goste so that nowe we may thinke ryghtly of god and dreade god and beleue hym cÌ„ By this appereth that without Chryste and without the holy gooste the lawe can not be done wherfore we professe that we muste neades inchoate or begynne to fulfyll vnto our powers the lawe and euer more attempte to do it more and more And we compryse here bothe two aswell the spirituall mocyons as the outwarde good workes wherfore the aduersaryes do falsly calumnyate vs in reportynge that we teache not good workes sythe we nat only requyre them but also shewe howe they maye be done The very proufe of the thyng doth condeÌ„pne and bewraye the ypocrites whiche attempt by theyr owne powers to do the lawe that they can nat perfourme the thyng that they attempt For the nature of man is farre to weke of the owne powers to resyst the deuyll who hath al in his holde as captiues prisoners which be nat delyuered by fayth The powers of Christ is requisite agaynst the deuyll and therfore because we knowe that for Christe we be herde receyue a promyse it is requisyt that we pray that the holy ghoste may gouerne vs and protect vs lest we fortune to erre deceyuyng our selues and leaste by wycked impulsion we take vpon vs any thyng agaynste the wyll of god As the Psalme teacheth He led captiuitie a captiue he gaue gyftes to men For Christ hath veynquyshed the deuyl and hathe gyuen vnto vs a promyse and the holy ghoste to the ende that we may also vaynquyshe by yâ— socoure of god And IohaÌ„ sayeth To this intent appered the son of god that he myght losen the workes of the deuyll Furthermore we teache nat only how the law may be done but also howe the thynge that is done may please god which is nat because we satisfy the lawe but because we be iÌ„ Christe as it shal be sayde a lytle here after So it is euideÌ„t that we requyre good workes yea we adde also that it is impossible to seuere the loue of god though it be lytle from faythe For by Christe we approche to the father and after the receite of remissioÌ„ of synnes we be assured that we haue god that is to say that we be regarded of god we make inuocacion we gyue thankes we feare we loue as Iohan teacheth in the fyrst epystle we loue hym quod he because he fyrst loued vs meanyng because he gaue for vs his son and remitted our synnes Thus he signifyeth that fayth goeth before and loue foloweth Also the fayth of whiche we speake â—s declared in penaunce .i. it is conceyued in â—eares of the coÌ„scieÌ„ce which feleth the wrath of god kyndled against our synnes and seketh remission of synnes and a gayle deliuery from synne And in suche feares and other afflictions this fayth oweth to encreace and be confirmed wherfore it can nat be in them whiche lyue after theyr fleshe whiche delyte in theyr lustes and obey them Therfore Paule sayeth There is no condempnacion nowe to these whiche be in Christe Iesu
whiche walke nat after theyr fleshe but after the spirite Also we be dettours nat to the fleshe that we shulde lyue after the fleshe For if ye lyue after the fleshe ye shall dye But if in spirite ye mortifye the actes of the bodye ye shall lyue Wherfore this fayth whiche receyueth remission of synnes in the troubled and affrayed herte and fleyng synne dwelleth nat in them whiche folowe theyr lustes nor staÌ„deth nat with deadly synne Out of these effectes or operacions of fayth the aduersaries pycke out one and that is loue â–ª and teache that it iustifyeth Thus it manifestly appereth that they only teache the lawe They reache nat fyrste that we receyue remissioÌ„ of synnes by fayth They teache nat of the mediatour Christe that for Christe we haue God our good lorde but for our owne loue And yet what maner of loue that is they tell nat nor can nat tell They bragge glory that they fulfyll the lawe where as this glory is properly due to Christ and they lay the affiaâ—Ì„ce of theyr owne workes to the iudgemeÌ„t of god for tâ—ey say that they deserue grace eternall lyfe de condigno .i. of theyr owne worthynes This is vtterly a wycked and a vayne affiaunce For in this lyfe we can nat satisfye the lawe because the carnall nature ceaseth nat to bryng forth euyll affections al though the spirite in vs resysteth theÌ„ But a man may demaunde of vs a question sythe that we also confesse that loue is the worke of the holy ghost and syth it is ryghtwysnes for it is the fulfyllyng of the law why do nat we teache that it iustifieth â–ª To this we answere Fyrst it is certayne that we receiue nat remission of synnes neyther by loue nor for or loue but for Christ by only fayth Only faythe whiche loketh to the promyse and is assured that god forgiueth because Christ dyed nat in vaine ouercometh the feares of synne of death If a man doubteth whether hys synnes be forgyuen hym he disworshyppeth Christe sythe he iudgeth hys synne greater or stronger then the death and promyse of Christe where Paule sayeth that grace surmounteth synne that is to say that mercye is aboue synne who thynketh that he attayneth remission of synnes because he loueth dishonoreth Christ and he shal fynde in the daye of gods iudgement this affyaunce of his owne propre iustice to be wycked voyde Ergo fayth must recoÌ„cile make of the iniust iust And as we receiue nat remissioÌ„ of synnes by the other vertues or for the other vertues of the lawe as for pacience chastitie obedieÌ„ce towarde the superiours cÌ„ and yet these vertues must ensue so we neyther receyue remissyon of synnes because of the dilectioÌ„ of god Howbeit it is a commune fourme of speakyng otherwhyles to comprise in one worde bothe the cause and the effect by a figure called Synecdoche as in the seuenth of Luke Christ sayeth Many synnes be forgyueÌ„ her because she loued muche For Christ expouneth him selfe wheÌ„ he addeth Thy fayth hathe saued the. Christ then meant nat that the woman by that worke of loue shulde deserue remissioÌ„ of synnes and therfore he clearly sayeth Thy faythe hathe saued the. But fayth is the thyng which conceiueth mercy for the worde of god freely If ye deny that thê is fayth ye vtterly knowe nat what faythe meaneth The very historye of it selfe sheweth sufficiently what he calleth loue in this place The woman cam brynging with her this opinion of Christe that in hym â–ª she shulde fynde remission of synnes This worshyp is the most hyghe worshyp of Christ she coulde gyue no greater worshyp vnto hym This is the trewe fashyon of acknowledgyng Messias to seke at hym remission of synnes And to conceiue this opinion of Christ thus to worship him is rightly and truly to beleue But this worde loue Christe vsed nat to the womaÌ„ but to the Pharisee for he coÌ„pared the hole worshyppyng of the Pharisee with the hole worshyppyng of the woman He chydeth the Pharisee because he acknoweledged hym nat to be Messias although he dyd vnto hym these externe officies as vnto a straunger and an holy greate man he poynteth to the woman and commendeth her worshyppyng her oyntment â—eares cÌ„ whiche all were sygnes of fayth a certayne coÌ„fession that at Christ she sought remission of synnes Undoutedly this was a greate example which nat without cause moued Christe to chyde the Pharisee whiche was a wyse and an honest man but one that beleued nat This impietie he vpbraideth him and instructeth him by the example of the woman signifieng that it was a shame yâ— where as an vnlerned woman beleued god he a doctour of the lawe beleued nat and acknowleged nat Messias nor sought nat at hym remission of synnes saluacion So theÌ„ he prayseth the hole worshyppyng as it is ofte done in scripture that in one worde we shuld coÌ„prise many as here after we shall shewe more at large in lyke places as in this saying Gyue almes and all shal be clene he requyreth nat only almesdedê but also the iustice of faythe so also here wheÌ„ he sayeth Many synnes be remytted vnto her because she loued muche that is to saye because she hath worshypped me truly by fayth and excercises and signes of fayth he coÌ„pryseth the hole worshyppyng but in the meane seasoÌ„ yet he teacheth thys that properly remission of synnes is receyued by fayth althoughe loue confession and other good workes do necessaryly ensue wherfore he meaneth nat this that those frutê be a recoÌ„pense or raunsum for whiche remission of synnes is gyuen whiche may reconcile vs to god we dispute of a greate thing euen of the honour of Christe and from whens the godly myndes may fetche a sure ferme consolacion whether our truste is to be put in Christe or in our workes If so be that we owe to set our trust in our workes then we must plucke from Christe the honour and title of a mediatour and redemer And yet we shall fynde in the iudgement of god that this confidence is vayne and that the conscience from thens shall ruÌ„ne into despayre That if remission of synnes and reconciliacyon chaunseth nat frely for Christ but for our loue and merites no man shal haue remission of synnes but where he fulfylleth the hole lawe for the lawe iustifieth vs nat so longe as it can accuse vs. It is euident then syth iustificacion is reconciliacion for Christ that by fayth we be iustified for it is most certayne that by only fayth is receyued remission of synnes Nowe therfore let vs answere to the question afore proposed why loue iustifyeth nat The aduersaries thynke ryghtly that loue is the fulfilling of the lawe And doubtles the obedience towarde the lawe were ryghwisnes if we coulde do the lawe But we haue here tofore shewed that the promisses were therfore gyuen because we coulde nat do the lawe And for this selfe cause denyeth Paule
the conscyence fleynge the ire of god can not obtayne peace nor be assured that God heareth them But when fayth commeth whiche beleueth that we be freely iustifyed she dare call vpon God and feleth that she is harde and she atteyneth to the true knowledge of God For in the worlde stycketh alwayes a wycked opinion of workes The Gentyls had sacrifices which they toke of the fathers whose workes they folowe but theyr faythe they holde not but imagyned that tho workes were a satisfaccion and pryce to reconcile God vnto them The people of the lawe folowed sacrifiicies with thys opinion that for tho workes they shulde pacifye God euen for the selfe worke In whiche thynge we se howe vehemently the prophetes chyde the people as Non in sacrificiiâ— arguam te I shal nat reproue the for thy sacrifyces And Hieremie I gaue no commaundemente of sacrifycies Suche places do damne not the workes for God commaunded them as ciuile excercyses in thys politike gouernaunce but they damne the wycked persuasion in that they thought to pacifye God by tho workes and dyd caste awaye faythe And because no workê that they dyd quieted theyr conscyence therfore they styll deuysed newe workes besyde the coÌ„maundementes of God And the examples of sayntes moste of all moued meÌ„ for by the imitation of theÌ„ they hoped to be reconciled as they were The people of Israel sawe that the prophetes sacrifysed in hyghe mounteynes They began with a wonderful deuotion to folowe thys worke that by it they myght please God But the prophetes sacrifyced in hyghe mountaynes not that by tho workes they myght deserue forgyuenes of synnes but because they taught in tho places Therfore they ther propowned an example of theyr fayth The people harde that Abraham offered vp hys sonne Wherfore they also that by alyke worke they myght pacifye the ire of God dyd sacrifyce theyr owne children But Abraham not with suche opinion offered hys son that the selfe worke shulde be a pryce and redemptyon of hys synnes and so to be iustifyed So in the church was instituted the supper of the lorde or sacramente of the Aulter for a rememberance of the promyses of Christ of which in this sacrament we be admonished and that fayth shulde be confyrmed in vs and that we shulde coÌ„fesse emonge other our fayth and extolle the benefytes of Christ as Paule sayth As ofâ—e as ye shall receyue it ye shall preache or shewe the deathe of the lorde c. But our aduersaries coÌ„tende that the masse is a worke which of the selfe iustifyeth and taketh awaye the gyltynes of the synne and of the payne in them for whom it is done Saynte Anthony Bernarde Dominik Francise and other holy fathers dyd chose a certayne kinde of lyfe for other profytable excercises but yet they wyst that they were reputed iust for fayth in Christ and nat for tho excercises But the multitude after them folowed nat the faythe of the fathers but the examples without fayth that by tho workes they shulde obtayne forgyuenes and consequently iustifycation Thus erreth mans mynde touchynge workes because they vnderstande nat the iustice of fayth And this errour the Gospell rebuketh whiche teacheth that men be ryghtwyse nat for the lawe but for Christ but Christ by only fayth is wonne g o ergo by only faythe for Christe we be recompted iust But the aduersaryes obiecte a place out of the Corinthes If I hade all the faythe and haue no charitye I am nothynge And here they royally triumphe Paule say they in thê place certifyeth the hole Churche that only faythe iustifyeth not But it is an easy thynge to answere syth we haue afore shewed what we thiÌ„ke of loue and workes Thys place of Paule requyreth loue and that we also requyre For we sayde afore that there muste be in vs a renewynge and an imperfect fulfyllinge of the lawe Wherfore if a man casteth away loue although he hath a great fayth yet he retayneth it nat For he retayneth nat the holy gost Nor it ensueth nat therfore that loue iustifyeth that is to wytte that for loue we receyue remission of siÌ„nes that loue vanqwysheth the feare of deth and of syn that loue ought to be put agaynste the wrathe and iudgemente of God that loue satysfyeth the lawe and that they whiche be renouate be acceptable to God for the fulfyllynge of the lawe and nat freely for Christe Paule sayth nat so which yet the aduersaries fayne that he saythe Nowe yf by our loue we ouercome the wrath of God if by our loue we deserue before God remission of synnes yf by our fulfyllynge of the lawe we be accepted let the aduersaryes take awaye the promyse of Christe lette them defete the Gospell whiche teacheth that we haue an entre to the father by Christ our mediatour which teacheth that we nat by our fulfyllynge of the lawe but for Christe be accepted The aduersaries do corrupte many places because they bryng theyr opinions vnto them and take nat theyr opinions out of them For what incommoditie hath this place if we plucke from it the interpretation whiche the aduersaries do sowe vnto it of theyr owne nat vnderstandynge what is iustificatioÌ„ or howe it is made The Corinthes whiche before were iustified had receiued many excellent gyftes And they were ferueÌ„t in the begiÌ„nyng as comonly it cometh to pas but after there began to be disseÌ„sioÌ„s amongest them as Paule signifieth they beganne to be wery of good teachers Therfore Paule chydeth them callynge them home agayne to the officies of loue Nor he desputeth nat here of remission of synnes of the maner of iustification but he speaketh of the frutes And he vnderstaÌ„deth it of loue towarde the neyghbour But it is a greate foly to dreame that loue towarde maÌ„â— iustifieth before god syth iÌ„ iustificacion we haue to do with god hys yre muste be pacified and the conscience muste be quieâ—ed towarde god And none of all these thyngê be done by the loue but only by mercie these thynges be brought about And mercie is by only fayth atteyned Yet I must nedes graunt that if loue be lost the holy ghost is loste and if the holy ghoste be loste fayth muste nedes be also loste Therfore he sayeth If I haue nat loue but he addeth nat the affirmatiue that loue iustifyeth But they dispute that loue is preferred before fayth and hope For Paule sayth that the greatest of these is loue Nowe it is moste lykely that the greatest chefest vertue dothe iustifye To this I answere thus Althoughe Paule in thys place speaketh properly of the loue of the neyghbour and signifieth that loue is greatest because it hathe most frutes where as fayth and hope only haue to do with god but loue outwardly towarde men hath iÌ„finite officies yet let vs grauÌ„t vnto our aduersaries that the loue of god and our neyghbour is the greatest vertue syth thê precepte is the greatest Thou shall loue
is without workê And where he saieth that we be iustified by fayth and workes suerly he meaneth nat that we be renewed or regenerate by workes nor he meaneth nat that partly Christ is our redemer and partly that our workê be our redemption Nor he describeth nat here the maner of iustifycation but he describeth what manner of persones the iuste be after they be ones iustified and renewed And thys worde iustificari i. to be iustifyed signifyeth here nat to be made of the iniust iuste but after an outwarde fashion to be pronounced rightwyse â–ª as it is taken in thys sayeng Factores legis iustificabuntur .i. The doers of the lawe shal be iustifyed Lyke therfore as these wordes haue no incoÌ„uenience the doers of the lawe shal be iustified so thynke we of the wordes of Iames man is iustified nat only by fayth but also by workes for vndoubtedly men be pronounced iuste hauynge fayth and good workes For good workes in holy men and women as we sayde before be iusticies of the lawe whiche be accepted bycause of the faythe and nat bycause they satisfye the lawe Men then be iustified by faythe and workes nat bycause of the workes but by cause of the faythe whiche yet good workes muste nedes folowe For Iames speaketh of tho workes whiche folowe faythe as he wytnesseth when he sayeth fayth helpeth his workes so we muste take The doers of the lawe shall be iustified that is to saye they whiche beleue and haue good frutes be pronounced ryghtwyse For the lawe is satisfied if we beleue and it pleaseth bycause of the faythe and nat bycause the workes do satisfye the lawe Thus we se that in these sentencies is no inconuenience but the aduersaries depraue and corrupt them addyng theyr owne gloses For it is nat sayde that workes deserue remission or that men for theyr workes be accepted and reputed ryghtwyse before god nat for Christ and that the workes do pacify the hartes and ouercum they re of god and that workes nede nat mercie None of all these thynges sayeth saynt Iames whiche yet the aduersaryes asscribe to his wordes ☞ ⧠There be cyted also agaynst vs other sentencies of workes as Daniel 4. Redeme thy synnes with almes dedes And Esay 58. Breke thy bread to the hungrye then pray and god wyll heare the. Luke 6. Forgyue and ye shal be forgyuen Matth. 6. Blessyd be the mercifull for they shall obtayne mercye To these sentencies and semblable of workes fyrste we make thys answere whiche hathe be made before that the lawe is nat trulye wrought without fayth Neyther dothe it please but for faythes sake in Christe accordyng to that sayeng of Christe without me ye can do nothyng Also without faythe it is impossible to please god Also by Christe we haue coÌ„mynge or way to god through faythe Therfore as often tymes as workes be required and praysed the gospell of Christe is to be put vnto Secondarily these textes which I haue a lytle here tofore recited be well nere sermons or preachynges of penaunce for they be made of two partes They haue in the begynnynge preaching of the lawe whiche rebuketh synne and commaundeth good workes Afterwade there is added a promyse But this is moste certein and vndoubted that in preachynge of repentaunce it is nat sufficient to préache the lawe whiche dothe comonly trouble and condeÌ„pne the coscience But it is requysite that preaching of the gospell be added that synnes be frely forgyuen for Christe and that by faythe we obtayne remission of synnes These thynges be so certayne and so clere that if our aduersaries wolde vary from them and exclude Christe and faythe from the preachyng of repentaunce they were worthy to be reiected as persones blasphemous agaynst Christ. Wherfore the sermon of Daniel ought nat onely to be applyed to almose deades but faythe also is to be requyred in it The sermon of Daniel is farre vnlyke the speache of Aristotle who wryttyng vnto his kynge Alexander doth also exhorte hym to liberalite and counseilleth him to vse his power to the comen vtilite and to the welth of al the people and nat to pride For thus he wrytteth to Alexander wherfore assay and endeuour your selfe to vse apply your Empiere and dominion nat to any contumely or pryde but to munificence and liberalite For sothe thys was a very honest sayeng and there coulde nothiÌ„g be sayde better touchiÌ„g the duetie of a greate prynce But Daniell instructeth and teacheth his kyng nat only of his office or calling but also of repentaunce of loue and deuotion towardes god of remission of synnes and of those greate thynges whiche be clene aboue philosophy Nat only therfore almouse deadê be to be requyred here but also faythe And that the texte dothe declare where it sayeth that the kyng was conuerted nat only to gyuing of almouse but muche rather to faythe For there remayneth yet the excellent confession of that kynge and prayse of the god of Israel There is none other god whiche can saue in this wyse So then there be two partes of the sermon of Daniel The one parte is the preachyng of repentauÌ„ce whiche rebuketh synnes and gyueth monition of a newe lyfe sayeng Redeame thy synnes with ritghtuousnes thy wyckednes with benefites towardes yâ— pore For so speaketh Daniell in his owne tongue where it appereth sufficieÌ„tly that he gyueth nat only instruction of almes dedes but of all iustice .i. of the knowlege of god fayth For he sayth Redeme thy sines by rightuousnes Nowe iustice toward god is fayth by whiche we beleue yâ— god forgyueth vs. Afterward Daniel giueth iÌ„struction of benifites towardê pore men whiche is that he shuld nat gouerne proudly nor cruelly but prouide diligeÌ„ly se for the profetê of his subiectê the other parte of his sermoÌ„ promyseth remission of siÌ„nes Lo thy sines shal be healed Hierome here besydes yâ— purpose puttith to a dubitatiue particle forsitaÌ„ muche more vnwysely he disputeth in hys coÌ„mentaries that remission of synnes is vncertayne But let vs remembre that the gospell vndoubtedly promyseth remissioÌ„ of siÌ„nes And he is to be iudged to disannull abrogate the gospell whosoeuer thynketh that remissioÌ„ of siÌ„nes is vncertayn Let vs therfore nat regard Hierome in thys place Nowe for asmuche as here is a promyse euidently put doubtles faythe is required for a ê“myse can nat be receyued but by fayth Howbeit eueÌ„ there also he sheweth yâ— remissioÌ„ might chauÌ„ce wheÌ„ he sayth Redeme thy siÌ„nes And thys promyse of remissioÌ„ of synnes is a verie prophetical and an euangelical sentence which doutles Daniel wold to be receyued by fayth For Daniel knewe that remissioÌ„ of siÌ„nes was promised for the sede that was to come that is to wyt Christ and that nat only to the Israelites but also to al nations For els he coulde nat haue promysed to the kynge remissyon of synnes For it belongeth nat to man namely in the affrayes of
synne to decre determyne of the wille of god without some assured worde of god that he wyll cease to be angry Therfore syth here is a promyse put it appereth sufficiently that faythe is requyred for a promise caÌ„ nat be receyued but by fayth Yf thê fayth shuld depende vpon the coÌ„dition of workes then were remissyon vncertayne Therfore such maner fayth is required which dothe trust on the mercy of the worde of god and nat vpon our owne workes And where he sayth Redeme thy synnes by iustyce and by almes deades It is as moche as if he had sayde Redeme thy synnes by repentaunce For by penauÌ„ce or repentaunce the gylte is taken awaye Neyther is it to be reasoned here of that god dothe forgyue for workes folowynge but he forgyueth because of hys promyse suche persones as do receyue hê promyse We haue shewed plainly that iÌ„ the oration of Daniel fayth is requyred wherfore they do iniury to thys place who so euer do conclude therof that remission of synnes commeth for our owne workes and nat by fayth for Christes sake It is a philosophicall poynte in the sermon of Daniel to require nothyng but an exhortation of gouernynge hys Empyere wele and it is a pharisaâ—call poynte to fayne vnto it that for that selfe worke remyssyon of synnes dothe come But thus it cometh to passe workes naturally do runne into meÌ„s eyes for mans reason neyther perceyueth neyther consydereth fayth and therfore it dreameth that those workes deserue remission of synnes This opinioÌ„ naturally cleaueth in the myndes of men and can nat be shaken of oneles we be other wyse taught by the worde of god We ought to call our selues backe from this carnall opinion to the gospell and to the promyse of mercye in which is freely exhibited remission of synnes for Christes sake So in al places of penauÌ„ce faythe is râ—â—uisite For it were most hyghe iniury agaynste Christe to seke remission of synnes without Christ. Some men do interprete Daniel to speake of remission of payne when he sayth Redeme thy synnes with almose Admyt it were taken so yet Daniell shulde make nothynge agaynste vs howe be it it is no doute but that he speaketh of the remission of the synne For the remission of ponyshement is sought in vayne onles the hart fyrst by fayth hathe receyued remission of the synne Nowe yf they wyll graunte that remission of the syn commeth freely by faythe We wyll afterwardes not sticke to graunt them that the paynes or ponishementes wherwith we be chastised be mitigated and aswaged with good workê and with hole repentance accordynge to the saynge of Paule Yf we wolde iudge our owneselues doutles we shulde not be iudged of the lorde And Hieremie Yf thou wylte be turned I wyll conuerte and turne to the. Also Zacharie Turne ye to me and I wyll turne to you And in the .xlix. Psalme Call on me in the daye of trouble and I shall delyuer the. c. Euen in lykewyse it is to be iudged of thys place also Forgyue and ye shal be forgyuen For it is wel nere a lyke sermon of repeÌ„tauÌ„ce The fyrste parte requireth good workes The latter parte addeth and putteth to a promyse nether it is to be resoned that our forgeuinge of our neyghboure by the vertue of the warke wrought dothe deserue that our synnnes be forgyuen vs for Christ dothe nat say so But lyke wyse as to other sacramentes Christe ioynith and knitteth to a promyse of remissioÌ„ of synnes euen so dothe he also knitte a promyse to good workes And lyke wyse as in the supper of the lorde we obtayne nat remissyon of siÌ„nes without fayth by the very worke that is wrought euen so no more do we in thê worke yea the forgyuinge of our neyghbour is no good worke but wheÌ„ it is done of them which be reconciled Therfore our forgiuing which is acceptable and pleasaunt to god foloweth goddes forgiuynge Nowe Christe is wonte after suche sort to ioyne together the lawe the gospell that he dothe teache bothe two I meane the doctryne of fayth and the doctrine of good workes to th end he shuld admonishe vs that it is but hypocrisy and a faynynge of repentance onles good frutes do folowe also to th entent we myght haue many outwarde sygnes of the gospell and of remission of synnes whiche shulde put vs in rememberaunce and comforte vs and yâ— we myght many wayes excercise faythe After thys wyse therfore it is necessary to vnderstonde suche places leste we shulde abrogate the gospell of Christe and pleade our workes agaynste God as a raunsome and pryce reiectynge Christe Also leste remissyon of synnes be made vncertayne yf it be taught to hange vpon the condition of our workes There is alledged also thys texte out of Tobie Almose dede delyuereth from all maner synne and deathe We wyl nat call thys an hyperbolicall or excessiue maner of speakinge howe be it it ought so to be taken that it plucketh nothynge awaye from the dewe prayses of Christe whose proper benefites and offyce is to delyuer from synne and deathe But we must haue recourse to this rule that the lawe without Christe auayleth not Those almoses therfore please god whiche folowe reconciliation nat those which go before So then they delyuer from synne and death not by the vertue of the worke that is wrought but as we sayde a lytle here to fore of repentaunce that we ought to ioyne fayth with frutes so lyke wyse it is to be iudged of almose deades that fayth with the frutê pleaseth For Tobie preacheth nat only of almose dedes but also of faythe saynge At all tymes blesse god and desyer of hym to directe thy wayes But thys thiÌ„ge properly belongeth to the faythe wherof we speake whiche feleth god gratious and fauorable for hê owne mercy desireth that he wyl kepe and gouerne vs. Besydes this we grauÌ„t â–ª that almose dedes do merite many benefytes of god and delyuer nat from the synne that is present for they ouer come nat the wrath and iudgement of god nether make they quiet the consciences but they deliuer from synne that is to come I meane they do meryte that we maye be defended in the perilles of sinnes and deth This is the symple vnderstandynge agreyng to the other scriptures For alwayes the prases of warkes of the lawe be so to be vnderstanded and taken that they do nat mynyshe the glorye of Christe and of the gospell The saynge also of Christe is alledged out of the gospell of Luke Gyue ye almose and lo all thynâ—es be cleane vnto you Undoutedly our aduerâ—aryes be starke deeffe so ofte tymes hathe it ben sayd that the lawe without Christ dothe nat auayle for whose sake good warkes do please and be accepted But they in all places excludynge Christe teache that the warkes of the lawe deserue iustifycation This place yf it be brought forthe hole and perfecte shall shewe that faythe also is requyred
For Christ rebuketh the pharises whiche thought theÌ„ selues to be made cleane in the syght of god that is to saye to be iustifyed by theyr oft washinges euen as a certayne byshope of Rome sheweth of holy water that it sanctifyeth and clenseth the people And the glose sayth that it cleneth from venial synnes Suche were also the opinions of the Pharisies whiche Christ reprehendeth and he setteth against this fayned purgatyon two maner of clennes the one inwarde the other outwarde he byddeth that they shulde be made cleane inwardly and addeth concernynge outwarde clennes Gyue in almose of your superfluitie and aboundance and so all thynges shal be cleane vnto you Our aduersaryes do not ryghtly applye thys partycle or sygne vnyuersall omnia for Christe addeth thys conclusyon to bothe members Then all thynge shal be cleane to you that is to witte yf ye shall be clane inwardly and shall gyue almose outwardly For he sygnifyeth that outwarde clennes is to be sette in the warkes commaunded by god and not iÌ„ the traditions of men as then were tho ofte wasshinges and nowe a dayes is the dayly sprinclyng of holy water the habites of religious persons as they be called the deuersite choyse of metes and lyke pompes But our aduersaryes do corrupte the sentence with sophistrie translatynge the vniuersall perticle to the one parte alone All thynges shal be cleane to you yf ye gyue almose as yf a man shulde make thê reason S Andrewe is present g o ergo al the Aposteles be present Wherfore in the antecedente both members ought to be ioyned together in thys wyse Beleue and gyue almose so all thynges shall be cleane to you For the scripture sayth in another place that the hartes be purifyed by faythe That if the hartes be clensed and afterwarde almose dedes be put to outwardly that is to saye almanner workes of charite so shall they be cleane al together that is for to saye not onely within but also without And that hole sermone of Christe ought to be ioyned together of which there be many partes wherof certayne do teache of faythe and certayne of warkê And it is no ê“perty of a good reader to pycke out the preceptes of warkes leuynge out the places of faythe There be some also which do interprete it to be an Ironicall locution Gyue ye almose and all thynges be cleaue vnto you For Christe semeth dryly to checke the vayne persuasion of the phariseis whiche whan they had theyr myndes laden with moste lewde affections yet in the meane season because they gaue almose thought theÌ„ selues to be halfe goddes Thys interpretatyon is nat vnmete neyther hath it any thing in it selfe dissonante or contrary to the other scriptures We wolde put to also other places but that we thinke that by these places which we haue rehersed and declared all other lyke may easely be iudged But we shall yet adde this scolastical argumeÌ„t Ryghtuousnes must nedes be in the wyll g o ergo faythe whiche is in the vnderstandyng doth nat iustifye This argument we do therfore reherse that the hole matter myght be made more playne howe fayth doth iustifye and what Paule dothe call iustifycatyon And fyrst because of certayne wayward persons we shall answere artificiously Thê is playne in morall philosophie that iustyce is called obedyence towarde the superiour such as he accepteth and alloweth But faythe is an obedyence towardes the gospell Wherfore faythe is ryghtly called iustyce for obedience towardes the gospell is imputed and rekened for ryghtuousnes in somuche that obedyence towardes the lawe only doth therfore please because we beleue that god is frely gracious and louinge to vs for Christes sake for we do neuer satisfye the lawe Nowe althoughe this faythe be in the wyl for it is to wyl and to receyue the promyse yet neuer theles this obedyence towarde the gospel is not for our clennes imputed for ryghtuousnes but because it receyueth the mercy that is offered and thynketh that we be reputed ryghtuous for Christes sake by mercy and nat for our owne fulfylling of the lawe nor for our owne clennes So the mynde is to be called awaye from gasynge on the lawe vnto the gospell and vnto Christe and we must assure our selues that we be reputed ryghtuous when we do thynke our owne selues to be accepted for Christes sake and nat for our owne loue or for our owne fulfyllynge of the lawe And faythe differeth froÌ„ hope for faythe receyueth at thê present tyme remissyon of synnes recoÌ„ciliation or acceptatyon of our owne selues for Christes sake But hope is busye aboute the good thynges that be to come and aboute delyueraunce to come Secondarely Iustifycation here in thê place signifieth to be reputed rightuous Now god dothe nat repute a man ryghtuous after the maner that a man is reputed ryghtuous in the corte of causes or in philosophi for the iustyce of hys owne warkes whiche maye wele be put in the wyl But he reputeth a maÌ„ ryghtuous by mercy for Christes sake so that a maÌ„ do receyue hym by fayth Wherfore fayth may be called Iustyce for it is that thynge which is imputed to rightuousnes as paule is wont to speake in what so euer parte of man it be put For that dothe nothynge at all let goddes imputatyon howe be it we do put thys faythe in the wyll of man for it is to wyll and to receyue the promyse of Chryste And thys scolasticall argument thus debated because it dryueth the matter to an art the hole cause semeth moche the better to be perceyued By 〈◊〉 these thynges it maye be also perceyued what is to be iudged de merito condigni that is to wyt of the meryte of worthynes of whiche our aduersaryes do fayne that men be ryghtuous in the syght of god for theyr owne loue and fulfyllynge of the lawe Here is no mencion at al made of the iustyce of fayth and in the stede of Christe the mediator is put that we be accepted for our fulfyllynge of the lawe These thynges are in no wyse sufferable but as we sayd before though loue foloweth renouatioÌ„ yet maye nat the glorie of Christ be taken froÌ„ hym and geuen to our fulfyllynge of the lawe but it is to be thought that euen after the renouation also we be accompted iust for Christes sake and that Christ remayneth styl a mediator and mercy stocke and that by the meanes of Christ and for him we haue commynge and entre to the father and that we do nat satysfie the lawe but that we haue alwayes nede of mercy and that we be alwayes compted iust for mercye And thys thynge dothe the hole churche confesse that we be made ryghtwyse and saued throughe mercie as we haue heretofore recyted forthe of Saynt Ierome Our ryghtuousnes is not for our owne meryte but commeth of the mercie of god But so it is that thys mercy is receiued by faith g o ergo cÌ„ But se
I pray you what incoÌ„uenience ensueth of the opinioÌ„ of our aduersaries if it shulde be thought that Christe dyd onely meryte the fyrste grace or fauoure as they cal it and afterwardes we be accepted for our owne fulfyllinge of the lawe and do deserue eternall lyfe when shall conscyencies be quiete when shal they be assured that they haue the fauour of god for the lawe alwayes accuseth vs as Paule sayeh Lex iraÌ„ operatur the lawe worketh wrathe So shall it come to passe that yf the conscyence shal fele the iudgement of the lawe they shall runne in to desperatyon Paule sayth All that euer is not of fayth is synne But these persons wyl neuer worke any thynge by faythe yf they shuld neuer thynke them selues to haue god gracyous and louinge vnto theÌ„ but when they haue fulfylled the lawe yea rather they shall euidently perceyue that they haue nat satisfyed it And therfore they shall neuer determyne within them selues that they haue goddes fauour and that theyr prayer is hard â–ª and consequently they shal neuer loue they shall neuer truly worshyppe god Suche maner of hartes and myndes what other thynge be they but very helle it selfe syth they be ful of desperatyon and of the hatred of god and yet in thys hatred they do cal vpon god and do worshype god as Saule dyd worshyppe hym Here we prouoke appele to godly mindes and skylled of spirituall thynges These can testifye that those forsayd evyls ensue of that vngodly persuasyon of our aduersaryes who thynke that we be reputed iuste in the syght of god for our owne fulfyllinge of the lawe and bydde vs nat trust in the promyse of mercie frely gyuen for Christê sake but rather in our owne fulfyllyng of the lawe It is therfore expedient to determyne with our selues that vndoutedly after renewinge we be rightwise or acceptable to god and yâ— we haue peace in yâ— sight of god through mercy for Christ and also that such incoÌ„plete beginninge of the lawe in vs is not worthy of eternal lyfe but that lyke wyse as remission of synnes and iustifycation is imputed throughe mercy for Christ and nat for the lawe euen so eternal lyfe with iustificatioÌ„ is offered nat for the lawe and for the perfection of our workes but throughe mercy for Christê sake as christ him selfe sayth This is the wyl of my father who hathe sente me that euery one which seth the son and beleueth in hym shall haue euerlastynge lyfe But let vs enquyre of our aduersaryes what counsell they gyue vnto them that be at the poynte of deth whether they do bydde them thinke that they be compted iust and to loke after euerlastynge lyfe for theyr owne workes or els for the mercy of god for Christê sake Certes nether Paule nether LaureÌ„ce wyl say that they are to be compted ryghtuouse for theyr owne clennes or that euerlastinge lyfe is to theÌ„ due for theyr owne workes or fulfyllynge of the lawe but they wyl thynke them selues to be reputed iust to receyue eternal lyfe for Christê sake throughe mercy Nether can godly myndes be armed againste desperation onles they thinke that through mercy for Christes sake they haue assuredly bothe ryghtuousnes and euerlastyng lyfe and nat for the lawe Thê sentence comforteth setteth vp and saueth godly myndes Wherfore thaduersaryes when they auaunce extolle meritum condigni .i. the merite of worthynes they quyte put away yâ— doctrine of fayth and of the medyator Christe dryue conscience to desperation But some happely wyll saye if we are to be saued by mercy what diuersitie is there betwyrt them to whoÌ„ saluation chaunseth and them to whom it doth nat chance Shal both good men bad meÌ„ egally hope and trust after mercye This argumente semeth to haue moued the schole men to seke meritum condigni .i. the meryte of condignitie or worthynes For there must nedes be some diuersity betwixt those that shal be saued those that shal be dampned And fyrste of all we say that with iustifycation is offered euerlastynge lyfe or that they whiche are iustifyed be the sonnes of god and coinheritours with Christ accordynge to thys sayinge of Paule Whome he hathe iustyfyed the same he hathe also gloryfyed Therfore saluatyon chaunceth to none saue to those that be iustifyed And lykewyse as iustifycation shuld be vncertayne yf it dyd haÌ„ge vpon the condition of our workes or of the lawe and were nat frely receyued for Christes sake thrugh mercie So yf hope dyd leaue to our workes then in dede it shulde be vncertayne because the lawe dothe alwayes accuse conscyence Nether can there be any hope of eternal lyfe except the conscyence be at peace and reste For the conscience that is in doute flâ—eth the iudgement of god despayreth but it is necessary that the hope of eternal lyfe be certayne and vndouted and therfore that it may be vndouted and certaine we must thinke that euerlastinge lyfe is gyuen frely throughe mercy for Christes sake and nat for our owne fulfyllyge of the lawe In courtes and in the iudgementes of men ryght or deuty is for the most parte certaine vndouted but the mercy of the Iudge is vncertayne But here in the sight of god the thinge is farre otherwyse for mercy hath the playne and euident commaundemente of god for the gospell is that same coÌ„maundement which byddeth vs beleue that god is wyllinge to forgyue and to saue vs for Christes sake accordynge to that sayenge of Christe God hath not sent hys son into the worlde to iudge the worlde but that the worlde shulde be saued by him whosoeuer beleueth in hym is not iudged As often tymes therfore as mention is 〈◊〉 of mercie it is to be vnderstondeâ— that faythe is required And this fayth maketh the â—â—â—erence betwixte them that shal be saued them that shal be daÌ„pned betwene them that â—e worthy â–ª and them that be vnworthy For eternal lyfe is promysed to theÌ„ that be iustifyed And fayth iustifieth whensoeuer men do receyue it And we ought to labour and striue al our lyue longe that we maye gette and establyshe thys fayth for thê fayth as we haue sayd before is won in repentaunce nat in theÌ„ which walke after the fleshe â–ª And it ought to encrease al our lyfe longe amonge ieoperdies and temptations And whosoeuer haue goten this faythe those be borne agayne that they maye worke well and that they may do the lawe Therfore lykewyse as we require repentaunce through out all our lyfe tyme so we do also reâ—uyre good workes all thoughe our workes be nat suche that for them eternall lyfe is due lykewyse as Christe sayde in lyke sentence When ye haue done all thynges saye we be vnprofytable seruauntes And Barnarde sayeth ryght well thus It is necessary fyrste to beleue that thou canst not haue remission of synnes but by the onely indulgence and pardon of god Secondarily that thou canst haue no maner good
worke at all onles it also be frely gyueÌ„ vnto yâ— And a lytle after he sayth Let no maÌ„ therfore begile hym selfe for yf he wyl consyder wel he shall fynde with out doute that he is not able to go forthe with tenne thousande agaynste hym whiche commeth to hym with twenty thousande c. We therfore to th entent that consciences shulde retayne a sure and vndouted consolation and hope do cal men backe agayne to the promise of Christe and do teache that it is necessarye to beleue that god for Christes sake and nat for the lawe dothe forgeue synnes doth iustifye and dothe gyue eternall lyfe accordynge to that saynge Who so euer hath the son hath lyfe But it is a worlde to heare howe our aduersaryes do dally and elude thê sayinge of Christ. When ye haue done all thynges yet say ye we be vnprofytable seruauntes In the confutatyon thus they corupt it fyrst they go about to coÌ„found vs with our owne reason by a fourme of argument which is called antistrephon in this maner If when we haue done al thinges we must saye we be unprofytable saruauntes g o ergo moche rather when we haue beleued all thynges we maye say that we be vnprofitable seruauntes Marke I praye you howe greatly our aduersaryes be delyted in vanities and in chyldishe sophistrie But albeit these folyshe trifles be nat worthy to be refuted and dysproued yet neuertheles we shall make answere to them in fewe wordes Theyr argumente called antystrephon is vicious and nothynge worth For our aduersaryes be deceyued in thys worde faythe which yf it betokened the knowledge of the historye or yf we had sayde that faythe of her owne worthines had saued then shulde the symylytude be of moche more strengthe that we be vnprofytable seruauntes thoughe we had beleued But we do speke of the fayth and truste of the promyse and of the mercy of god And thys faythe dothe graunte that we be vnprofytable seruauntes yea thys is the verye voyce and saynge of fayth that our workes be vnworthy and that we be vnprofytable seruauntes And for thys only cause we speke of faythe and seke mercie because we knowledge our selues to be vnprofytable seruauntes For faythe dothe therfore saue because it receyueth mercie or the promyse of grace all thoughe our workes be vnworthy And after this vnderstandynge the antystrephon dothe nothynge hurte vs when ye shal haue beleued all thynges yet say ye we be vnprofytable seruauntes it is well sayde yf it be onely vnderstonded that worthynes is taken from workê But agayn on the contrary syde yf it be thus vnderstonded that faythe also is vnprofytable then the symilitude is nothynge worthy to say when ye shall haue done al thynges do nat truste to your workes So whan ye shall haue beleued do not trust the promyse of god These thynges do not agre together for they be verie fare vnlyke Unlyke causes vnlyke obiectes of confydence and truste be in the fyrst proposytion and in the latter Truste in the fyrst proposytion is the trust of our owne workes Truste in the latter proposytion is the trust of goddes promyse Nome Christe condempneth confydence and truste in our owne workes but he dothe nat disalowe the trust in his owne promyse he wyllith nat that we despayre of the grace and mercie of god he rebuketh our warkes as vnworthy but he rebuketh not the promyse whiche frely offereth mercy And Ambrose speketh excedyngly wele in thê poynte thus Grace is to be knowen but nature is not to be knowen we muste truste to the promyse of grace and not to our nature But our aduersaries folowe there accustomed maner They do vngraciously wrest the sentence that maketh for fayth agaynst the doctrine of fayth For this cauillation dothe abrogate the gospel to say â–ª when ye shall haue beleued all thynges saye that fayth is vnprofytable Doth nat the gospell promyse remission of synnes and saluatioÌ„ euen vnto them whiche haue no good workes at all so that they wyll be conuerted and nat despayre but by fayth in Christe obtayne remission of synnes Do our aduersaryes bydde them despayre whose consciences fynde no good warkes whiche they may plede agaynst the iudgement of god Wyl they say vnto theÌ„ that faythe is vnprofytable God gyue these sophisters a myschefe with such cauillations whiche do subuerte the hole gospell whiche do abrogate the free remyssyon of synnes whiche do take awaye from godlye conscyences ferme and sure consolatyons But that cauillatyon amonge other is vtterlye childishe wher as they interprete the seruauntes to be vnprofytable because the workes be vnprofitable to god but profitable to vs. But Christ speketh of yâ— vtilitie and profet whiche maketh god dettour to vs of grace Howbeit it is besyde the purpose here in this place to dispute of vtilitie or inutilitie For vnprofitable seruauntes betoken vnsufficient or vnable seruauntes for no man feareth god so muche no man loueth so muche no man beleueth or trusteth god so muche as he ought to do no man fulfilleth the lawe But let vs nowe passe ouer these vayne cauillations of our aduersaries of whiche howe men wyll iudge if at any tyme they shal be brought forthe in to lyght Wyse men may easely gesse In wordes moste playne and euident they haue fouÌ„de a starriÌ„g hole But who seeth nat that in this place is reâ—uked the confidence and truste of our owne workes But our aduersaries do crye agaynst vs that eternall lyfe is due of worthynes for our owne god workes bycause eternal lyfe is called a rewarde We wyll make a shorte and a playne answere Paule calleth eternall lyfe a gyfte because when we be reputed ryghtuous for Christes sake we be also made the sonnes of god and coinheritours with Christ. But in another place it is wrytten Plentuous shal your rewarde be in heuen If our aduersaries do thiÌ„ke that theâ—e thinges be repugnaunte the one to the other let them selues dissolue the doubte But they be none indiffereÌ„t iudges For they leaue out this worde gyfte they leaue out also the fountaynes of the hole busynes that is to saye in what wyse men be iustified and that Christe is contynually a Mediatour In the meane season they pycke out thys worde rewarde And that they do most bytterly interprete nat only agaynst the scripture but also agaynste the custome and vsuall maner of speakyng Hereof they reason because it is called rewarde that therfore our workes are suche whiche ought to be the pryce for which eternall lyfe is dewe Uerely thys is a newe kynde of logyke We hear thê worde rewarde ergo our workê do satisfy and fulfyl the lawe Ergo we be accepted to god for our owne workes and nede nat the mercy of Christ the propitiatour or faythe receiuiÌ„g mercy And they cumulate a greate heape of argumentes one vpon another after the maner of Chrysippus Good workes be the pryce for whiche eternal lyfe is due Good workes do
satisfy the laâ—e of god And besydes ther may be done â—orkes of superogation Therfore men maye nat only satisfy and fulfyll the lawe of god but also do more theÌ„ fulfyl it And because Monkes and Freers do more than fulfyl the lawe therfore they haue merites more then they nede them selues And because it is liberalalite to gyue vnto other of that whiche thou haste aboue thyne owne necessitie therfore they may gyue those merites to other men They deuise also a sacrament that is to say a wytnes and a marke of this gyuyng for wheÌ„ men be deade they put about them the habites of theyr relegious men to witnesse that other mens merites be applyed vnto them With suche coaceruatioÌ„s our aduersaries do deface the benefite of Christe and the iustice of faythe ⧠We do nat here rayse vp vayne pratyng about the worde But we stryue about a greate thiÌ„g that is to weâ—e wherof godly myndes ought to conceyue sure and vndoubted hope of saluation whether good workes maye set consciences at peace and quyetnes Whether they ought to thynke that eternall lyfe is so gotteÌ„ if they do set theyr good workes agaynste the iudgement of god orels they ought to thynke that through mercy for Christes sake they be reputed ryghtous do obtayne eternall lyfe These thyngê do come into controuersie whiche onleâ— the coÌ„science do discusse and iudge it can nat haue any stronge and sure consolation But we haue declared euideÌ„tly ynough that good workes do nat satisfie the lawe of god but that they haue nede of mercye that by faythe we be accepted with god for Christê sake also that good workes do nat set the coÌ„science at reste and peace Of all these thyngê it foloweth that we ought to thynke that for Christes sake through mercy and nat for the lawe they that be iustified do obtayne eternal lyfe What shall we say then as touchyng the name of rewarde Fyrste if we shulde say that eternall lyfe is called a rewarde because it is due to them that be iustified by reason of the promyse we shulde nat speake any thynge amysse For these gyftes be ordered among theÌ„ selues as AugustiÌ„ne sayeth Dona sua coronat deus in nobis .i. God crowneth rewardeth hys owne gyftes in vs. But the scripture calleth eternal lyfe a rewarde nat because it is due for our workes but because it dothe recompense the affections and workes albeit yet it is gyuen for another cause Lykewyse as the inheritaunce commeth to the good mans sonne of the howse nat for his owne workes or seruice and yet neuertheles it is a rewarde and recoÌ„pense of the warkes and seruice of the son It is sufficieÌ„t therfore that the name of rewarde dothe for thys cause agre to eternall lyfe be cause eternall lyfe dothe recompence good workes and afflictions Eternall lyfe therfore is nat a rewarde because our workes be sufficient or because it is due for workes but consecutiuely because although it be due for another cause yet neuertheles it dothe recompense good workes and afflictions ⧠Besydes thys we do graunte that workes be in very dede meritorious nat of remission of synnes or of iustificatioÌ„ for workes do nat please but in theÌ„ that be iustified and that because of faythe Neyther be they worthy of eternall lyfe For as iustification commeth by faythe for Christes sake so dothe viuificatioÌ„ but they be meritorious of other rewardê corporall and spiritual whiche are gyuen partly in this lyfe and partly after thê lyfe For god differreth the most parte of hys rewardes vntyll he dothe glorifie sayntes after thys lyfe because he wyl that they be excercised in this lyfe to mortifye the olde man The gospell dothe frely set forth and exhibete the promise of iustification and viuification for Christes sake But in the lawe rewarde is offered and is due nat frely but for workes For asmuche therfore as workê be a certayne fulfyllyng of the lawe they be well called meritorious and it is well sayde that rewarde is due vnto them And this rewarde engendereth degrees of rewardes accordyng to that sayeng of Paule Euery man shall receyue rewarde accordynge to hys owne labour These degrees be rewarde of warkes and of afflictions But our aduersaries do contende and styffly affyrme that eternall lyfe is only due for workes because Paule sayeth He shall rendre to euery man accordynge to hys work In the fyfthe of Iohan. who so euer haue wrought well shall ryse agayne to the resurrection of lâ—fe In the .xxv. of Mathewe I was hungry and ye gaue me meate In all these places in whiche workes be commeÌ„ded and praysed it is necessary to haue recourse to the rule a boâ—â—remembred that is to saye that workes please nat without Christe nor that Christe the mediatour is nat to be excluded Wherfore when the texte sayeth that eternal lyfe is gyuen to warkes It meaneth that it is gyuen to them that be iustified For good workê do nat please god but in them that be iustified that is to say in them whiche thynke them selues accepted to god for Christes sake And they that be iustified do necessarily bryng forthe good workes or good frutes as I was hungry and ye gaue me meate Here when it is sayde that eternall lyfe is giuen to these workes the meanyng is that it is gyuen to ryghtuousnes Therfore he coÌ„prehendeth fayth when he nameth the frutes And the scripture nameth the frutes to shewe that god requyreth nat hypochrisy but iustice whiche is full of efficacitie and workyng and a certayne newe lyfe bryngynge forthe good frutê Neyther do we couet here any vayne or vnfrutful subtilite For they be very wayghty causes for whiche we do dispute these thyngê For if we do graunt to our aduersaries that workes do deserue eternall â–ª lyfe anone they adde these false and inconueniente thynges that workes satisfie the lawe of god that they haue no nede of mercy that we be ryghtuous that is to saye acceptable in the syght of god for our owne workes and nat for Christê sake â–ª that men maye do more then fulfyll the lawe So all the doctrine of the iustice of faythe is quyte ouerthrowne And vndoubtedly it is necessary that the pure doctrine of the iustice of fayth be reserued in the churche Wherfore we be compelled to rebuke the phariseicall opinions of our aduersaries bothe to the entent that we may set forth the glory of Christ and also that we maye set forthe vnto consciences ferme and sure comfortes For howe shall the conscience conceyue certayne hope of saluation whan it shal perceyue that in the iudgement of good workes be vnworthy Onles it knoweth that men be reputed ryghtuous and saued throughe mercy for Christê sake nat for our owne fulfyllyng of the lawe Dyd S. Laurence lyeng on the grydyron thinke that through the worke he satisfyed the laweof god and that he was voyde of syn and neded nat Christ the Mediatour nor the mercy of god No verely he
lyfte vp and coÌ„forte hym selfe with the gospell and the promise of Christe For faythe sheweth the diuer site betwene the contrititioÌ„ of Iudas and the contrition of Peter But our aduersaryes make theyr answere by the lawe that Iudas loued nat god but feared punyshementes but when shall a troubled and frayed conscience namely in these earnest true and greate terrours whiche be described iÌ„ the Psalmes and the prophetes and whiche those men do vndoubtedly taste whiche be truely conuerted when shall I say suche a troubled conscieÌ„ce be able to iudge whether he feareth and dreadeth god truly and for him selfe or whether he dothe but flee euerlastiÌ„g paynes These great motions and trobelouse may be haply discerned or disseuered by letres and vocabules but they can nat be depted so in suÌ„dre iÌ„ very dede as these swete sophisters do dreame Here we call vpon the iudgementes of all good wyse men They vndoubtedly wyl coÌ„fesse graunt that these disputations amonge our aduersaries be very darke doubtfull perplexe and intricate And yet here they be in hande with a moste wayghty matter and with the chief and principall place of all the gospell I meane coÌ„cernyng forgyuenes of synnes All thys hole doctrine concernynge these questions whiche I haue rehersed amonge our aduersaries is full of errours and hypocrisie and defaceth obscureth and endymmeth the benefyte of Christ the power of the keyes and the iustice of faythe These thynges be done in the fyrst acte or parte of the playe But what wheÌ„ they be come vnto confession What infinite and greate busines is there in that endles rehersall numbryng and reckenyng vp of synnes Whiche neuertheles for a greate parte is speÌ„t and consumed in mans traditions and lawes And because that the good and deuoute myndes myght be the more vexed they fayne and ymagen that this rehersall and iuste reckeniÌ„g of the synnes is commaunded by goddê lawe And though they do exacte and require thys rehersall of all the synnes vnder the pretence of the lawe of god yet in the meane season of absolution whiche is in dede of the lawe of god they speake full slenderly and full coldly They fayne that the selfe sacrament Ex opere operato that is to say euen of the very worke that is wrought gyueth and conferreth grace without any good mocion of the vser But of faythe who receyueth the absolution and coÌ„forteth the conscience is made no mencio nat all This is euen accordyng to the prouerbe Ante mysteria discedere that is to say to depart before the mysteries are begonne Nowe resteth and remayneth the thyrde acte or parte of the play whiche is of satisfactioÌ„s And thê acte hathe very confuse disputacions They fayne that euerlastynge paynes be chaunged into the paynes of purgatorie and that parte of these be relesed by the power of the keyes and parte they teache to be redemed with satisfactions They adde moreouer that satisfactions must be workes of suê‘erogation and them they set and put in moste folyshe obseruaunces whiche haue not the coÌ„maundement of god to beare them as in pylgrymages rosaries and lyke obseruatioÌ„s whiche be maynteyned by no coÌ„mauÌ„dement of god Furthermore lykewyse as· they redeme Purgatorye with satisfactions so hath there ben a crafte deuised of redemynge satisfactions whiche hath ben a very gayngfull profytable crafte and hath broughte in moche lucre For they sell pardones whiche they do interprete to be releasemeÌ„tê of satisfactioÌ„s And this gaynes coÌ„meth in not onely by them that be alyue but moche more largely by them whiche be deade And not onely by pardons but also by the sacrifice of the masse they redeme the satisfactions of deade men Finally the matier of satisfactions is endeles Amonge these sclaunders and offendicles of conscience for we be not able to reherse all and doctrines of deuyls the doctrine of the iustice of faythe in Christe â–ª and of the benefite of Christ lyeth oppressed ouerwhelmed Wherfore all good men do perceiue that the doctrine of Sophistes and Canonistes touchynge repentaunce or penaunce is by vs profitably and godly rebuked For these articles and poyntes folowynge be openly false and not onely disagreyng mere repugnant to the holy scriptures but also dissonauÌ„t variable from the holy fathers of the churche These be their articles ¶ That to the takynge awaye of synne onely the detestation hatred of sinne is sufficient ¶ That for our contrition not by faythe in Christe we do obteyne remission of synnes ¶ That we deserue remissioÌ„ of synnes by goddes couenaunt by good workes done without grace and obteyne it not by faythe that is to wite freely by the truste of mercy ¶ That the power and auctority of the keyes auaileth to the remission of siÌ„nes in the syght of the churche but nat in the syght of god ¶ That by the power of the keyes synnes be nat forgiuen before god but that the power of the keyes was instituted to chaunge eternall paynes into temporall and to lay vpon conscieÌ„ces certayne satisfactioÌ„s to institute newe sacrifices and ceremonies and to bynde consciences to suche maner satisfactions and ceremonies ⧠⧠¶ That the nombering or rekening vp of sinnes in confession of the whiche our aduersaries do teache is necessary by the lawe of god ¶ That canonicall satisfactions be necessary to redeme the payne of Purgatory or els be availlable as a recompensation to take awaye synne For so vnlerned men do vnderstande and take it ¶ That the receiuynge of the sacramente of penaunce by the vertue of the worke that is wrought without the faythe in Christe gyueth grace ¶ That by the power of the keyes soules be deliuered out of Purgatory by pardons ¶ That in reseruation of cases nat onely the canonicall payne but also the synne ought to be reserued in him whiche is truly conuerted ⧠We therfore to the enteÌ„t to deliuer godly and wel disposed coÌ„sciences froÌ„ these comberous and endles mases of sophesters do make two partes of penaunce that is to wytte contrition and faythe Yf any man lusteth to adde the thyrde I meane worthy frutes of penauÌ„ce that is to say good workê folowyng coÌ„uersion we wyl nat saye agaynste hym And we knowe well ynoughe that thys worde penitentia in latine that is to saye repentaunce amonge GraÌ„marious doth betokeÌ„ to mislyke and disalowe that thynge whiche before we dyd lyke and alowe This propertye is more agreinge to contricion rather then to faythe But we in this place to th entent to expresse and sette forthe the thynge before mens eyes do vnderstande by penauÌ„ce the hole coÌ„uersion in which there be two termes mortification and viuification whiche we call by the vsuall and accustomed names contrition and faythe As concernynge contrition we do cutte awaye those ydle vnfrutful and endles disputations as to dispute when we be sory throughe loue of god and when through feare of payne But we say that coÌ„trition is the true feares and terrours of conscience whiche perceiueth feleth
that god is angrie with syn and soroweth that it hathe synned and done amysse And this contrition is done when by the worde of god synnes be rebuked For this is the suÌ„me effecte of preachyng the gospel to rebuke sinnes and to offre remission of siÌ„nes iustice for Christê sake and also to offre the holy ghost and eternall lyfe and that we beyng regenerate and boâ—ne a newe shulde worke wele and do good dedes Thus Christe comprehendeth the suÌ„me of the gospel wheÌ„ he sayeth To be preached in my name repentaunce and remission of synnes amonge all nacions And of these terrours and dreades speaketh the scripture as in the psalme Because my synnes wyckednes haue gone ouer my heed lyke a greate heuy burden they haue lyen heuy vpon me c. I haue ben afflicted and humbled very soore I dyd rose for sorowe syghyng of my herte And in an other psalme he sayth Lorde haue mercy on me for I am weyke Heale me lord for my bones be troubled my soule is troubled very sore And thou o lord how longe And Esaye saythe In the halfe of my dayes I sayd I shall go to the gates of helle I hoped vntyl mornyng Euen lyke a lyon so hath he broused and broken al my bones In these terrours the conscience felethe the wrathe of god agaynste synne whiche is vnknowen to careles and recheles persones whiche walke after a fleshely fashyon This conscience seethe the fylthynes of synne and is earnestlye sory that it hath done amysse It also fleethe in the meane season the horrible wrath of god because mannes nature is not able to susteine it onles it be streÌ„gthed and borne vp with the worde of god So sayth Paule By the lawe I am deade to the lawe For the lawe onely accuseth and maketh afrayde coÌ„scieÌ„ces In these terrours our aduersaries do speake nothyng at all of faythe Thus onely they propowne and sex forth the worde whiche rebuketh synnes The whiche worde whan it is taughte onely is the doctrine of the lawe and not of the gospell with these sorowes and terrours they say that men do merite grace if it be so that they loue god But howe shall men loue god in the true feares terrours whan they feele the horrible wrathe of god whiche can not be expressed with the wordê of man What other thynge do they but teache desperation whiche in these troublous terrours do onelye shewe the lawe ¶ We therfore do adde that other parte of penaunce whiche is faythe in Christ to th ende that in these terrours the gospell of Christe myght be sette forthe to consciences in whiche is freelye promysed remission of synnes for Christes sake They oughte therfore to beleue that for Christes sake theyr synnes be freelye for gyuen them This faythe lyfâ—ethe vppe conforteth strengtheth and quickeneth contrite persones accordynge to that texte Iustificati igitur ex fide pacem habemus erga deum That is to saye we beinge iustified by faythe haue peace This fayth obteyneth remission of synnes it iustifieth in the syghte of god as the same place testifieth whan it sayth we beinge iustified by fayth c. This faythe sheweth the diuersitie betwyxte the contrition of Iudas â–ª and the contrition of Peter betwyxt the contrition of Saul and the contrition of Dauid The contrition of Iudas or Saule dothe not therfore auayle because faythe is not added vnto it whiche receyueth forgyuenes of synnes freely gyuen for Christes sake Contrarily the coÌ„trition of Dauid or of Peter doth therfore auayle because fayth is added whiche receyueth remission freely gyuen for Christ is sake Neyther is theyr any loue before that we be made at one by faythe For the lawe is not fulfylled without Christe accordyng to this By Christe we haue passage to god And this fayth groweth and encreaseth by lytle and lytle wrastleth throughout the hole lyfe with synne to th ende it maye ouercome synne and deathe But loue folowethe fayth as we haue sayd before And thus may filiall or sonly feare be playnly defined to be suche maner feare which is ioyned with faythe that is to say whan faythe coÌ„forteth and holdeth vp the troubled and fearefull herte Seruile or bondly feare is whan faythe doth not beare vp the fearefull herte How the power of the keyes doth administer and shewe forthe the Gospell by absolution whiche is the trewe voyce of the gospell So we also do comprehende absolution whan we do speake of fayth For fayth coÌ„meth by hearynge as Paule sayth For whan the gospell is herde whan the absolution is herd the coÌ„science is lyfted vp and gathereth conforte And because god dothe truely quicken by the worde the keyes do verely remitte synnes in the syghte of god accordynge to that texte who soeuer heareth you heareth me Wherfore credence is to be gyuen to the wordê of hym that assoileth none otherwyse thaÌ„ to a voyce souÌ„dynge from heuen And absolution may proprely be called the sacrament of penaunce as the beste lerned also of the schole diuines do speake In the meane season this faythe in temptatioÌ„s is many maner wayes nouryshed by the sentences of the gospell and by the vse of the sacrameÌ„tes For these be signes of the newe testament that is to say signes and tokeÌ„s of the remission of synnes They do offre therfore remission of synnes as the wordes of the souper of the lorde do euidentely witnesse whiche be these This is my bodye whiche is gyuen for you This is the cuppe of the newe testament c. So faythe is conceyued and establyshed by absolution by hearyng of the gospel by vse of the sacramentes to th eÌ„tent that it do not take a falle whyles it wresteleth with the terrours of synne deathe This instruction and doctrine of penaunce is plaine and clere augmenteth the dignitie of the power of the keyes and of the sacramentes setteth forthe the benefite of Christ and teacheth vs to vse Christe a mediator and a propitiator But bicause the confutation dothe coÌ„depne vs for that we haue putte these two partes of penauÌ„ce it is to be shewed that the scripture dothe put these principall parties in repentaunce or in the conuersion of a synner For Christ saith Come vnto me all ye whiche laboure and be loden and I shall refresshe you Here be two membres Labour and burden whiche is the fyrst membre or parte do signifie contrition and the dredes and terrours of synne To come to Christe whiche is the seconde membre is to beleue that for Christes sake synnes be forgyuen for whan we beleue oure hertes be quickened with the holy ghooste by the worde of Christe Therfore here be two principall partes that is to say contrition and fayth And in the fyrst chaptre of Marke Christe saythe Do ye repentaunce and beleue the gospell where in the fyrste parte he rebukethe synnes and in the latter parte he dothe conforte vs and sheweth remission of
synnes For to beleue the gospell is not that generall fayth whiche deuyls also haue but it is proprely to beleue that remission of sinnes is frelye gyuen for Christes sake For this is disclosed and shewed in the gospell Ye see here also two ê‘tes to be ioyned together I meane coÌ„trition whan sinnes be reâ—uked And fayth whan it is sayde Beleue ye the gospell If any any man wyll say that Christe doth comprise here also the frutes of repentance or the hole chaunge of lyfe we wyll not disagree to hym For this is sufficient to vs that these principall partes be named contrition and faythe Paule coÌ„monly euery where whan he describethe the conuersion or renouation makethe these two partes mortification and viuification as in the seconde chapitre to the Collossianes In whom ye be circuncised with circuncision not done with hande that is to witte by layeng of or puttynge away the body of the synnes of the flesshe And afterwardes In whom ye be also resuscitate by faythe of the efficacie and myght of god Here be two partes The one is caâ—â—iÌ„g of or puttyng away the body of synnes The other is resuscitation by fayth And these wordes mortification viuification castyng of or puttynge away the body of sinnes resuscitation ought not to be vnderstande Platonically of a fayned mutation but mortification signifiethe true terrours suche as be of men which be dyenge whiche terrours nature coulde not susteyne if it were not holden vp and conforted by faythe So lyke wyse castyngof the body of synnes he calleth that whiche we coÌ„menly call coÌ„trition For in those sorowes naturall concupiscence is purged and rydde out And viuification oughte to be vnderstanded not a Platonicall imagination but the consolation whiche truely mayntaineth lyfe fleynge away in coÌ„trition There be therfore here two ê‘tes contrition and faythe For sythe it is so that the conscience can not be set at peace and rest but by fayth therfore fayth only doth quicken accordynge to that sayenge A ryghtuous man shall lyue by faythe And afterwardes to the Collossianes he sayth that Christe doth blot out the chirograte or obligation whiche by the lawe is agaynst vs. Here also be two ê‘tes the obligation and the cancellynge and blottynge out the obligation The obligation is the conscience rebukyng condempnyng vs. The lawe is the worde whiche rebuketh and condempneth synnes This voyce therfore whiche saythe I haue synned to the lorde so as Dauid sayd is an obligation And this voyce or sayeng vngodly and careles men do neuer brynge forth ernestly For they do not se nor rede the sentence of the lawe wryten in theyr herte In the true dolours and terrours this sentence is seene The obligation therfore is coÌ„trition it selfe condempnyng vs. To cancell and blotte out the obligation is to take awaye the sentence of condempnation out of the mynde to graue in it the sure sentence by whiche we do thynke that we be delyuered from that condeÌ„pnation But faythe is that newe sentence whiche abrogateth and dissanulleth the former senteÌ„ce and gyueth peace and lyfe to the herte Howe be it what nede we to cite many testimonies and auctorities syth the scripture rennethe so full of them An the 11â— psalme Dauid saythe The lorde hath soore chastysed me and hath not delyuered me to deathe And in the .118 psalme he saythe My soule hath faynted for anguyshe StreÌ„gthen me with thy worde where in the fyrst membre is conteyned contrition And in the seconde the maner is playnly described howe we be refreshed and conforted in contrition that is to witte with the worde of god whiche offereth grace This worde holdeth vp quickeneth hertes Also in the fyrst boke of the kynges Dominus mortificat uiuificat deducit ad iÌ„feros reducit That is to say the lorde mortifieth quickeneth he bryngeth downe to helle bryngethe vppe agayne By the one of these is signified coÌ„trition and by the other is signified fayth And Esaye also sayth Dominus irascetur ut faeiâ—t opus suum Alienum est opus eius ut operatur opus suum The lorde shal be angrye to th entent he may do his owne worke The worke of hym is the worke of an other man that he may worke his owne worke He calleth it an other mans worke or a straunge worke and not his whan he doth make afrayde For the propre worke of god is to quicken and to conforte But he doth therfore make afrayde that there myght be place for consolation and viuification For careles hertes and whiche feele not the wrathe of god regarde not coÌ„solation After this sorte the scripture is woÌ„te to ioyne these two thynges together I meane feare and coÌ„fort that it myght teache vs that these be the principall membres in repentaunce coÌ„trition I say and fayth whiche conforteth and iustifiethe Neyther see we howe the nature of repentaunce can be more purelye taughte For these be the two principall workes of god in men to make afrayde to iustifie quicken the afrayde coÌ„sciences In to these two workes the hole scripture is distributed deuided The one parte is the lawe whiche sheweth reproueth and coÌ„dempneth synnes The other parte is the gospell that is to say the ê“myse of grace freely gyuen in Christe And this ê“myse is often tymes repeted in the hole scripture whiche was fyrste gyuen to Adam afterwarde to the patriarkes and after set forth by the prophetes and last of all it was preached and fulfylled by Christe amonge the Iewes and by the apostles spredde and diuulgate in to the hole worlde For by the faythe of this promyse all holy men haue bene iustified not for theyr owne attritions or contritions And examples do shewe lykewyse these two partes Adam is chydden after his synne and made throughly afrayde This was contrition Afterwardes god promysethe grace he saythe that there shall seede come by whiche shulde be destroyed the kyngdome of the deuyll deathe and synne There he offerethe remissioÌ„ of synne These be the chiefe poyntes For al be it afterwardes there is added punyshement yet this punyshement doth not merite remission of synnes And of these kyndê of punyshementes we shall speake not longe hereafter So Dauid is chydden of Nathan the prophete and beinge throughly troubled and made afrayde he saythe I haue synned agaynst the lorde This is the coÌ„trition Afterwardê he heareth absolution whaÌ„ the ê“phete saythe vnto hym The lorde hath taken away thy synne â–ª thou shalte not dye This voyce conforteth Dauid beareth hym vp by fayth it iustifieth and quickeneth hym Here is also added a punyshement But this punyshement doth not deserue remission of synnes Neyther be there always added peculiar peines but these two coÌ„trition feythe must nedes be alwayes in repentauÌ„ce as in the .7 chapitre of Luke A certeyn woman that was a synner came vnto Christ wepyng By these teares is knowen contrition Afterwardes she heareth absolution Thy synnes
sayenge Thy synnes be released the. For thus iudgeth thapostle that man is freely iustified by fayth These wordes of Barnarde do wonderfullye illustrate and set forthe our cause for he not onely requireth in a generalitie that we shulde beleue our synnes to be pardoned throughe mercye but byddethe vs also put to a speciall faythe by whiche we may beleue that euen vnto our owne selues sinnes be pardoned And he teacheth howe we may be assured of remission of synnes that is to saye whan by faythe hertes be lifted vp and be made quiete and set at rest by the holy ghoste What do our aduersaries require more Dare they yet deny that we obteyne remission of synnes through fayth Or that faythe is a parte of penaunce Thyrdly Our aduersaries say that synne is in this wyse forgyuen because he that is attrite or contrite doth brynge forthe an acte of the loue of god that by this acte he meriteth to receyue remission of synnes This is nothyng els but to teache the lawe and to destroy and abrogate the gospell and to disanull the promyse coÌ„cernyng Christ. For they do onely require the lawe and our workes for the lawe requireth loue Besydes this they do teache vs to truste that we obteyne remission of synnes bicause of contrition and loue What other thynge is this than to sette oure trust and confidence vpon our owne workes and not vpon the worde and promyse made by god of Christe Nowe if the lawe be sufficieÌ„t to the obteynyng of remission of synnes to what purpose nede we the Gospell what nede haue we of Christe if for our workes we obteyne forgyuenes of synnes But we contrarywyse do calle agayne consciences from the lawe vnto the gospell and from the truste in theyr owne workê to truste and to haue sure confidence in the promyse and in Christe because the gospell setteth forthe Christe vnto vs and promyseth remission of synnes freely for Christê sake By this promyse the gospel byddeth vs trust that for Christes sake we be recoÌ„ciled to the father and brought in to his fauour agayne and not for our owne contrition or for our owne loue For there is none other mediator or pacifier than Christe Neyther can we worke the lawe oneles we be fyrste reconciled by Christe And though we coulde do any thyng yet we ought to thinke that not for these workê we obteyne remission of synnes but for Christes sake whiche is the mediator and mercye stocke Yea it is iniurie and dishonour to Christe and a defeatyng of the gospell to thynke that we do obteyne remission of synnes for the law or by any other wayes than through faythe in Christe And this reason we haue handeled before in the title of iustification whan we tolde wherfore we do holde opinion that men be iustified by fayth and not by loue Therfore the doctrine of our aduersaries where as they teache that men for contrition and loue obteyne forgyuenes of synnes and bydde them truste in this contrition and loue is only a doctrine of the lawe and that not vnderstaÌ„ded Lykewyse as the Iewes dyd loke vpon the couered face of Moyses For admitte that we had loue let vs imagyne that we had workes yet can neither loue neither workes be a price raunsome or propitiation for synne Neyther can they be set and pleded as it were in barre agaynste the wrathe and iudgement of god accordyng to that sayenge of Dauid in the psalme Thou shalte nat entre in to iudgement with thy seruaunt for no creature lyuyng shall be iustified in thy syghte Neyther ought the honoure of Christ to be plucte from hym gyuen to our workê For these causes Paule dothe styffly affirme that we be not iustified by the lawe and he setteth agaynst the lawe the ê“myse of remission of synnes whiche is gyuen for Christes sake and reacheth vs that we freelye for Christis sake thrugh fayth receiue remission of sinnes To this promyse Paule dothe calle vs backe from the lawe Upon this promyse be byddeth vs stedfastly to beholde which doutles shal be voyde and of no strength if we be iustified before by the lawe or euer we be iustified by the promyse or if we obteyne remission of synnes for our owne iustice But the case is cleare that therfore the promyse was made vnto vs and therfore Christ was gyuen to vs because we can not worke and fulfyll the lawe wherfore it is necessary that we be fyrst reconciled by the promyse or euer we do worke the lawe But the promyse is onely receyued by fayth Ergo it is necessarye that contrite persones do by fayth receyue the promise of remission of synnes whiche is gyuen for Christis sake and that they do decree with them selfes that they haue the father recoÌ„ciled vnto them selfes freely for Christis sake This is the senteÌ„ce and mynde of Paule in the epistle to the Romanes â–ª where he saythe Therfore by fayth that accordyng to grace or fauour the promise myght be ferme and stable And to the Galathianes he sayth The scripture hath coÌ„cluded al thinges vnder synne that the promyse by the fayth of Iesu Christe myght be gyuen to them that beleue that is to say All men be vnder synne can not otherwyse be delyuered onles by fayth they do take and receyue the promyse of remission of synnes Fyrste therfore we must by faythe receyue remission of synnes before or we do worke the lawe al be it as it was aboue saide loue foloweth faythe because they that be regenerate do receyue the holy ghoste and therfore they begynne to worke the lawe We wolde recite mo testimonies and authorities if it were not so that they be open and at hande to euery deuoute and godlye reader in the scriptures For we couet not to be ouerloÌ„ge and tedious to thentente that this cause or mater may the more easelye be perceyued Neyther is it any doubte but that this is the senteÌ„ce of Paule whiche we do defeÌ„de that by fayth we receyue remission of sinnes for Christis sake and that by fayth we ought to set Christe the mediator agaynst the wrathe of god not our workes And let not the myndes of good men be troubled although our aduersaries do calumniate and corrupte the sentences of Paule There is nothynge spoken so purely and truelye but it may be depraued by captious cauillations We assuredly knowe that this which we haue recited is the very ryghte and true sentence and meanynge of Paule we knowe this oure sentence doth brynge ferme and stable coÌ„forte to godly coÌ„sciences without whiche no man is able to stande in the iudgement of god Wherfore let these pharisaical opinioÌ„s of our aduersaries be reiected and thrust out of mens â—ertes that we do not by fayth receyue remission of synnes but that we must merite remission with our loue and with our workes and that we ought to set our loue and our workes agaiÌ„st the wrath of god· This is the doctrine of
the lawe not of the gospell whiche doth fayne and imagine that man is fyrste iustified by the lawe before that he be reconciled by Christ to god notwithstandyng that Christe hym selfe saythe Without me â—e can do nothynge Also I am the true vine and ye be the braunches But oure aduersaries do imagine that we be the braunches not of Christ but of Moyses For they wyll fyrst be iustified by the law and offre theyr loue workê vnto god before that they be reconciled to god by Christe before that they be braunces of Christe Paule contrarywyse sayth playnly that the law can not be wroughte nor fulfylled without Christe Therfore the promyse is fyrst to be receyued that by faythe we maye be reconciled to god for Christis sake or that we worke the lawe These thynges we do iudge to be clere euident ynough to godly coÌ„sciences And herof they shall playnely ê‘ceyue the cause why we dyd heretofore holde opinion professe that men be iustified by fayth and not by loue For we muste plede agaynst the wrathe of god not our loue or our workes nor truste in our loue and workes but Christe the mediator and we muste fyrste receyue the promyse of remission of synnes or euer we worke the lawe Finally Whan shall the conscience be set at reste if we do receyue remission of synnes because we loue or worke the lawe For the law wyll always accuse vs bicause we neuer satisfie the lawe of god accordyng to the sayenge of saynte Paule Lex iram operatur The lawe worketh wrathe Chrisostome asketh the question concernyng penaunce wherby we be assured that our synnes be forgyuen vs our aduersaries also in the senteÌ„ces do aske the question concernyng the same thynge This can not be declared neyther consciences can not be made quiete onles they know that it is the coÌ„maundement of god and the very gospell that they shulde be assured that for Christes sake synnes be freely forgyuen and that they shulde not doubte but that they be freely forgyuen vnto them selfes If any manne dothe doubt he as IohnÌ„ sayth accuseth the diuine promyse of a lye This certeyntie and assuraunce of faythe we teache is required in the gospell But oure aduersaries leaue mennes conscieÌ„ces vncertayne and in a doubtfulnes Nowe coÌ„sciences do worke nothyng by fayth whan they do coÌ„tinually doubt whether they haue remission Howe can they in this doubtfulnes call vpon god Howe can they ê‘suade them selues be assured that they be herde Thus all theyr lyfe is without god and without the very true honoure and worshyppynge of god This is it that Paule saythe that what soeuer is not done of faythe is synne And bicause they continue alwayes in this doubtfulnes they neuer haue experieÌ„ce what faythe is So it coÌ„meth to passe at the laste that they fall in to desperation Suche is the doctrine of our aduersaries euen a verye doctrine of the lawe a dissanullyng and an aâ—rogation of the gospell and a doctrine of desperation Nowe we do gladly permitte vnto all good men to gyue iugement of this place concernyng penaunce for it is playne ynoughe without any maner of obscuritie and to pronounce whiche of vs haue taughte the more godly and more holsome doctrine for consciences whether we or our aduersaries Certes these dissensioÌ„s in the churche do nothyng delyte vs wherfore if we had not great and necessarie causes to dissent from our aduersaries we wolde with ryghte good wyll holde our peace Nowe sith it is so that they condempne the manifest and open veritie it standeth not with our profession neither is it laufull for vs to leaue this cause vndefended whiche is not ours but Christê cause and the cause of the churche We haue shewed for what causes we haue put these two partes of penauÌ„ce contrition and faythe And we haue done it so moche the rather bicause there be borne aboute many sayenges concernyng penaunce whiche be alledged of the fathers but maymed and vnperfecte whiche our aduersaries haue detorted wrested to the defacynge of faythe As for example Penaunce is to sorowe bewayle the offeÌ„ces coÌ„mitted and not to coÌ„mitte agayne whiche thou oughteste to bewayle and sorowe Also penaunce is a certeyne punyshement or vengeaunce of the sorower aueÌ„gyng in hym selfe the offence whiche he is sorye that he hath coÌ„mitted In these sayenges is no mention of fayth no not so moche as in the scholes whan they do interprete and declare them is any thyng at all added of faythe Wherfore we to th entent that the doctrine of faythe myght be the better espied haue nombred faythe amonge the partes of penauÌ„ce For those sayenges whiche do require coÌ„trition or good workes and whiche make no mention of faythe that iustifiethe the very thynge it selfe shewethe that they be very perylous And doubtles it may be thoughte and that not without cause that those men lacked a poynt of prudence wysedome whiche haue heaped together these peced and patched rablemeÌ„tes of sentences and decrees For where as the fathers in diuerse other places do speake of the other parte of Penaunce it shulde haue bene profitable to haue pyked out the sentences of both partes â–ª and to haue ioyned them together not only out of one parte For Tertulliane speakethe ercellently of faythe amplifienge the othe of the lorde whiche is in the prophete â–ª Viuo ego dicit dominus nolo mortem peccatoris sed ut conuertatur et uiuat .i. I lyue saythe the lorde I wyll not the deathe of a synner but that he be conuerted lyue For in as moche as the lorde dothe sweare ther he wyll not the deathe of a synner he shewethe and declareth that credence fayth is required by whiche we shuld beleue his othe surely reken with our selues that he dothe forgyue vs. The promyses of god ought to be of greate auctoritie with vs although they be made without any othe put vnto them at all But this ê“myse is also coÌ„fermed and bounde with an othe Wherfore if any man doth not surely reken with hym selfe that he is forgyueÌ„ he denyeth that god hath sworne a true othe whiche is so great a blasphemie that there can none be imagined more haynous For thus saythe Tertulliane He calleth vs to saluation with a reward swearyng also in that he saythe I lyue and couetethe that we gyue credece vnto hym O blessed be they for whose cause god sâ—â—eareth O moste wretched be we if we beleue not the lorde whan he also sweareth And here it is to be knowen that this faythe oughte to thiÌ„ke that god freely forgyueth vs for Christis sake bicause of his owne ê“myse and not because of our workes or contrition confession satisfaction or loue For if faythe shulde leane vnto these workes be grounded vpon them anone it is made vncerteine and doubtfull For the fearefull coÌ„science doth se that these workes be vnworthy Therfore saythe Ambrose very
perfecte confession In the bokes of doctours of the churche mention is made of coÌ„fession but they do not speake of this rekenynge vp of secrete synnes but of the ceremonies and maner of open penauÌ„ce For bicause that synners and persones of euyll fame were not receyued agayne in to the churche without certeyne satisfaction therfore suche maner persones made confession vnto the preestes to th entent that accordynge to the quantitie of theyr offences satisfactions myght be enioyned vnto them All this matter is no poynte lyke to this rekenynge vp of synnes wherof we nowe speake That confession than was made nat because that without it there could be no remission of synnes before god but because satisfactions coude not be enioyned onles the kynde of the synne were fyrst knowen For accordynge to the diuersitie of synnes sundry canons and constitutions were made And of that vsage maner of open penauÌ„ce we haue nowe onely the name lefte of satisfaction For the holy fathers wold not receiue agayne synners euyll famed persones onles they had fyrst knowen and proued the repentaunce of them so moche as myghte be And of this thiÌ„g there appereth to haue ben many causes For it was a good ensample to cause other to beware to chastise and correcte them that had offended as the glose teachethe in the decrees and it was an vnsemelye thynge and not coÌ„uenient to receyue notorious synners forthwith to the coÌ„munion These maners and customes haue ben laide down many yeres ago Neyther is it requisite to set them vp agayne for they be not necessary to remission of synnes before god Neyther was this the mynde opinion of the fathers that men shulde merite remission of synnes by suche vsages or suche workê How be it those sightê and spectacles of open peniteÌ„tes be rum onte to begyle the vnlerned vnskylled men in that that they thrughe this occasion thynke that by those workê they merite remissioÌ„ of synnes before god But if any man hath so thought he had a Iudaicall and an hethen thoughte For hethen men also had certeyne purgatioÌ„s and satisfactions of synnes by whiche they imagyned them selues to be recoÌ„ciled to god But now the custome and vsage beinge sayde downe and put away the name of satisfaction dothe remayne and a certeyne steppe token of the custome whiche is that in coÌ„fession be enioyned certeyne satisfactions whiche they call define to be workê not of duetie we call them canonicall satisfactions And of thys our opinion is lykewyse as it was of the rehersall of synnes that canonical satisfactioÌ„s be not necessarie by the lawe of god to the remission of synnes no more thaÌ„ these olde spectacles shewes of satisfactions in open penauÌ„ce were necessary by the law of god to the remission of sinnes For that senteÌ„ce concernyng faythe must be reteyned and kepte that by faythe we obteyne remission of synnes for Christis sake and not for any workes of ours eyther goynge before or folowynge And for this cause principally haue we disputed of satisfactions lest they shulde be receiued to the defacynge and obscurynge of the iustice of fayth lest men shulde thynke that for those workes they obteyne remission of synnes And this errour is encresed by many sayengê whiche be comenly vsed in scholes as for example when in the definition of satisfaction they put thys particle clause that it is done to pacifye the wrathe and displeasure of god But yet our aduersaries grauÌ„t that satisfactions do nat auayle or helpe to the remission of the sinne or offence but they ymagine that satisfactions be auaylable to redeme the paynes eyther of Purgatorie or els other For thus they teache that in the remission of syn god forgyueth the offense And yet because it is conuenient to the iustice of god to punyshe syn he chauÌ„geth the payne eternal into payne temporall transitory They adde moreouer that parte of that temporall payne is released by the power of the keyes and the residue is redemed by satisfactioÌ„s And it can nat be perceiued what paynes they be of whiche parte is released by the power of the keyes onles they do say that parte of the paynes of Purgatory be released of whiche thynge it shulde ensue that satisfactions be only paynes redemyng Purgatory and these satisfactioÌ„s they say to be of streÌ„gth also though they be done of them whiche be fallen agayne into deadly synne as who shulde say that the wrathe and displeasure of god might be appeased by them whiche be in deadly syn All this is but a fayned matter lately imagined without auctorite of scripture and of the olde doctours of the churche and nat somuch as Peter Lombard dothe speake after this maner of satisfactioÌ„s The schole men sawe that there were satisfactions in the churche but they perceyued nat that these open shewes and spectacles of penitentes were instituted partely for cause of example and partely to proue and trye them which desyred to be receyued of the churche Brefely they dyd not perceyue that it was a discipline and a matier vtterlye and mere politicall And therfore they superstitiously imagined those satisfactions not to be auaylable to discipline in the syghte of the churche but to be of power and strength to appease the diuine wrathe And likewyse as in other thingê they haue often tymes mengled together spiritual matiers and politike or ciuile matiers euen so the same hath happened also in satisfactions But the gloose in the canon lawes doth other whyles wytnesse that these obseruances ceremonies were iÌ„stituted for cause of discipline good ordre to be had in the church And see I praye you after what maner in the coÌ„futation whiche they haue presumptuously offered vnto the emperours maiestie they ê“ue these theyr fayned imagitioÌ„s They alledge many sayenges of the scriptures to begyle them whiche be vnlerned as thoughe this thynge had his auctoritie by the scriptures whiche in the tyme of Peter Lumbarde was as yet vnknowen They alledge these sentences Worke ye the worthy frutes of penaunce Also Gyue your membres to serue ryghtwysenes Also Christe preacheth penaunce sayenge Do ye penaunce Also Christe byddethe his apostles to preache penaunce And Peter preacheth penauÌ„ce in the seconde chapitre of the actes After this they alledge certayne sayenges of fathers canones And they conclude with these wordes Satisfactions in the churche be not to be put away coÌ„trary to the expresse wordes of the gospell and to the decrees of councels and of the fathers but rather they that be assoyled of the preest ought to ê‘forme and fulfyl theyr penauÌ„ce enioyned folowyng that sayenge of Paule He gaue hym selfe for vs to redeme vs from all iniquitie and that he myghte clense to hym selfe an acceptable people the ensuer and folâ—wâ—r of good workes Howe I â—â—â—eche god to destroy these wycked sophisters whiche so mischeuously do detorte wrest the worde of god vnto theyr most vayne dreames What
hypocriticall satisfactions whiche schole men do imagine euen than also to be auayllable to the redemynge of the paynes of Purgatory or of other paynes whan they be done of them whiche be in deadely synne And many argumentê may be gathered that these sayengê in scripture do in no manerwise appertayne to the scholasticall satisfactions These scholemen do fayne that satisfactions be workes not due Nowe the scripture in these teâ—tes doth require workê which be due For this sayenge of Christ Do ye penaunce is a sayenge of coÌ„mauÌ„dement Also our aduersaries do wryte that he which maketh his confession if he do refuse to receyue the satisfactions comenly called penaunce he dothe nat syn but he shall suffre the paynes in Purgatory But these senteÌ„ces or textes without doubte be sentences apperteynyng vnto this lyfe Do ye penaunce Do ye worthye frutes of penauÌ„ce Gyue your membres to do seruice vnto ryghtuousnes Ergo they can not be wrested and applyed to satisfactions whiche may laufully be refused For it is not laufull to refuse the preceptes of god Thyrdly Indulgences or pardones do release those satisfactions as the chapitre Cum er eo dothe teache But indulgeÌ„ces do not loose vs from these preceptes Do ye penaunce Do ye the worthye frutes of penaunce Wherfore it is manifeste that those sayenges of scripture be euyll applied to canonicall satisfactions Consydre moreouer what ensueth if the paynes of Purgatory be satisfactioÌ„s or satispassions as they call them or if satisfactions be a redemynge of the paynes of Purgatory do these sentences also commaunde that soules shulde be punyshed in Purgatory Syth this doth necessarily folowe of the opinion of our aduersaries these sentences Do ye worthye frutes of penaunce and Do ye penaunce must be interpreted after a nother maner than in this wyse Suffre ye the paynes of Purgatorye after this lyfe But I am wery to coÌ„fute these peuyshe imaginations of our aduersaries with any mo wordê For this is certayne and vndoubted that the scripture doth speke of workes that be due of the hole newnes of lyfe and not of these obseruyngê of workê not due wherof our aduersaries speake And yet with these fayned imaginations the orders of fryars do defende the sellynge of masses and infinite obseruaunces that is to witte bicause they be workê satisfieng if not for the offence or synne yet at least for the payne or punyshemeÌ„t of synne For asmoche therfore as the scriptures alledged do not saye that eternall paynes ought to be redemed with workes not due our aduersaries do folyshelye temerariously affirme that the sayde paynes be satisfied and redemed by satisfactions canonical Furthermore sythe it is mooste certayne that remission of synnes is a free thynge or is frely gyuen for Christis sake it folowethe that satisfactions be not required And the gospel hath a coÌ„maundement of forgyuynge synnes freely but not of layenge on punyshementes and newe lawes or of layenge on parte and remittyng a nother parte For where do they rede this in the scriptures Christe speaketh of the remission of synne whan he saythe Quiâ—quid solueris c. what soeuer thynge thou shalte loose vpon earth c. whiche being ones forgyuen eternall deathe is taken awaye and eternall lyfe is restored Neyther dothe Christe speake here of layeng on punyshementê whan he sayth what soeuer thou shalte bynde vpon earth c. but he speaketh of the reteinyng of theyr synnes whiche be not conuerted But the sayenge of Peter Lumbarde concernynge releasynge of parte of the paynes was taken forthe of the canonicall punyshemeÌ„tes Parte of those paynes the pastors or curatê dyd remitte Albeit therfore that we do thinke that repentauÌ„ce ought to brynge forthe good frutes because of the glorye and coÌ„maundement of god and good frutes haue the coÌ„maundementes of god for them that is to witte true fastê true prayers true almose dedes c. yet neuertheles we neuer fynde in the holy scriptures that eternall paynes be not remitted but for the payne of Purgatorye or for canonicall satisfactions â–ª that is to say for cetteyne warkes not due or that the power auctoritie of the keyes hath a warrante and commaundement to chaunge paynes or remitte ê‘te of them These thyngê our aduersaries ought to haue proued Besydes this the deathe of Christ is not only satisfaction for the offence or synne but also for eternall deathe accordyng to that sayinge of the ê“phete Ero mors tua o mors I wyll be thy deathe o deathe What a monstruous thynge than is it to say that the satisfaction of Christe dothe redeme the synne or offence and our paynes do redeme eternall deathe so that nowe that sayenge I shal be thy deathe ought to be vnderstande not of Christ but of our workes and that not of workes coÌ„maunded by god but of certeyne colde ceremonies deuised by men Yea and it is moreouer sayd that our paynes put away euerlastyng death euen than also whan they be done in deadely synne It can not be thoughte howe greate grefe it is to me to recite these folyshe mad imaginations of our aduersaries whiche who soeuer dothe well consydre he can not chose but be angrye with these doctrines offendes whiche the deuyll hath sowen spred abrode in the Churche to oppresse the knowledge of the lawe and of the gospel of repentance and of vinification and of the benefites of Christ. For as concernynge the lawe thus they saye God coÌ„descendyng to maÌ„nes infirmitie hath sette and ordeyned to man a measure of these thinges vnto whiche he is bounden of necessitie and that is the obseruyng of the coÌ„maundementes so that with the residue of workes whiche they call workes of suê‘erogation he may make satisfactioÌ„ for his offeÌ„ces sinnes Here they fayne that men may so worke and fulfyll the lawe of god that they may also do more than the lawe dothe require But the scripture euerywhere dothe crye that we be farre of from that perfection whiche the lawe requirethe But these felowes do imagine that the lawe of god is contented with outewarde or ciuile iustice they se not that it requireth the true loue of god with all our hertes c. and that it condempneth al concupiscence in nature Wherfore no man dothe so moche as the lawe requireth It is a folyshe thyng therfore to fayne that we may do more than the lawe requireth For though we may do these outwarde warkes not coÌ„maunded in the lawe of god yet that is a vayne wycked assurance to thinke that we haue satisfied and fulfilled the lawe of god Moreouer trewe prayers true almose dedes true fastes be required by the commaundement of god And where they be requisite by the coÌ„maundement of god they may not be lefte vndone without synne On the other parte those warkê whiche be not coÌ„maunded by the lawe of god but haue a certayne fourme and fasshyon by the appoyntement of man be workes of mennes traditions of whiche Christe saythe
thynge thou shalte bynde vpon earthe it shal be bounde in heuen And what soeuer thyng thou shalte louse vpon erthe it shal be loused also in heuen Howe be it as we haue sayde before the keye hath not power to laye on punyshementes oâ— to institute honourynge of god but onely it hath coÌ„maundement to forgyue synnes vnto them whiche be conuerted and to rebuke and excoÌ„municate them which wyll not be conuerted For as to louse signifiethe to forgyue synnes so to bynde signifiethe not to forgyue synnes for Christe speaketh of a spirituall kyngdome And the commaundement of god is that the ministers of the gospel shulde assoyle them whiche be coÌ„uerted accordynge to that texte of Paule Power and auctoritie is gyuen vs to edification Wherfore the reseruation of cases is a politicall and ciuilâ— thynge For it is a reseruation of canonicall punyshement and not a reseruation of synne in the syghte of god in them whiche be truelye conuerted Wherfore oure aduersaries do iudge well whan they do graunte that in the article of deathe that reseruation of cases ought not to let absolutioÌ„ We haue set forthe and declared the summe of our doctrine as touchynge penaunce whiche doctrine we knowe assuredly to be godly and holsome to good myndes And good men if they shal compare our doctrine with the most confuse and troublesome disputations of our aduersaries shall perceyue ryghte well that our aduersaries haue lefte out the doctrine of faythe iustifieng confortyng godly hertes For they shall see that our aduersaries do fayne many thingê of the merite of attrition of that endeles rehersal of synnes of satisfactions hangynge nothyng together and as the olde prouerbe is touching neither heuen ne earth but strayeng and wanderyng clene wyde from the purpose and such as euen our aduersaries them selues can not sufficiently declare ☞ Of the numbre and vse of the ⧠sacramentes ⧠IN the .xiij. article our aduersaries do allowe that we do saye the sacramentes not only to be signes or tokens of profession amonge men as certayn men do fayne but rather to be signes and testimonies of the wyll of god towardes vs by whiche god moueth and styrreth hertes to beleue But here they byd vs also to accompte seuen sacramentes We thynke that men oughte to beware that the thynges ceremonies instituted in the scriptures be not despised howe many soeuer they be Neyther do we thiÌ„ke it to make any great matter although diuerse men for cause of teachyng do nombre or recken diuerse wayes so that they kepe well the thynges taught in the scripture For the olde wryters haue not all numbred them after one maner and facyon If we call sacramentes rytes or ceremonies whiche be coÌ„maunded by god vnto whiche is added a promyse of grace it is an easye thyng to iudge whiche be ê“prely sacramentê â–ª For rytê or ceremonies iÌ„stituted by men shall not after this maner proprely be called sacramentes For it belongeth not to the auctorite of man to promyse grace wherfore signes instituted without the coÌ„mauÌ„dement of god be not sure and vndoubted tokeÌ„s of grace albeit peraduenture they teache ignoraunte simple persones or elles put them in remembraunce of somewhat The very sacramentes therfore be Baptisme the Souper of the lorde Absolution whiche is the sacrament of penaunce For these rytê or vsages haue for them the coÌ„maundement of god and haue also added vnto them a promyse of grace whiche is proprely belongyng to the newe testameÌ„t For hertes ought surely and vndoubtedlye to beleue that whan we be baptised whan we do eate the bodye of oure lorde whan we be assoyled that god dothe verely forgyue vs for Christes sake And god doth also by the worde the ceremonie moue and styrre the hertes to beleue and to gather fayth as Paule saythe â—ides ex auditu Fayth is by hearynge And lykewyse as the worde runneth in to the eares that it may stryke vnto the hertê euen so the ceremonie of it selfe runneth in to the iyes to moue and styrre the hertes The effecte of the worde and of the ceremonie is all one as it was full excellently sayde of sayncte Augustine who saythe that a sacrament is a visible worde because the ceremonie is receyued of the iyes and is as it were a picture of the worde signifienge the same thynge that the worde dothe signifie wherfore theffecte of them bothe is all one Confirmation the last enneylyng be rytes or ceremonies receyued of the fathers which the churche dothe not require as necessary to saluation bicause they haue not the coÌ„maundemeÌ„t of god wherfore it is not vnprofitable to disseuer these ceremonies from the other aboue sayd whiche haue the expresse coÌ„maundement of god to maynteyne them and a clere promyse of grace Preesthod our aduersaries do vnderstande not of the administratioÌ„ of the worde of god and of the sacrameÌ„tes to be gyuen forthe vnto other but they do vnderstande it of sacrifice as thoughe in the newe testamente there oughte to be a preesthod lyke vnto the preesthode leuitical coÌ„mauÌ„ded by Moses law whiche shulde make sacrifice for the people and deserue remission of synnes to other men We teache that the sacrifice of Christ dyenge on the crosse was sufficient for the synnes of the hole worlde and dothe not nede besydes the helpe of any other sacrifices as thoughe it were not sufficient for oure synnes wherfore men be iustified not for any other sacrifices but for that onely sacrifice of Christe if they beleue them selues to haue ben redemed with that sacrifice Therfore preestes be elected called properlye to teache the gospell and to ministre sacramentes to the people Wherfore if ordre be vnderstanded of the ministratioÌ„ of the worde of god we wyll nat stycke to call ordre a sacrameÌ„t For the ministration of the worde hathe for it the commaundement of god And it hathe many greate promises as in the fyrst chapitre to the Romans The gospel is the power of god to saluation vnto euery one that beleueth Also Esaie in the .55 chapitre My worde that shal go out froÌ„ my mouth shall nat retourne vnto me voyde but it shall do what soeuer thingê I haue willed c. If ordre after this maner be vnderstanded we wyll nat be greued to call also the imposition or layeng on of the handes a sacramente For the churche hath a coÌ„maundement to constitute and ordeyne ministers whiche ought to be verie acceptable vnto vs because we knowe that god dothe approue that ministration and is present at that ministratioÌ„ And it is profitable also as much as may be to garnishe the ministration of the worde with al maner prayse agaynst mad men whiche dreame that the holy ghoste is gyuen nat by the worde but for certaine preparatioÌ„s of theyr owne if they syt ydle holdynge theyr tonges in darke places lokyng after illumination lyke as they dyd in olde tyme whiche were called enthusiastes whiche fayned them selues
shal excuseys to al them that shal come after vs so that it can nat be layde to our charge ne any faute can be put in vs that the auctoritie of bysshoppes is minished and enfebled when men shall reade and heare that we albeit we desyre the bysshoppes nat to vse this vniuste crueltie towardes vs yet can we iÌ„ no wyse obtayne any maner equitie or ryght of them Of mans traditions in the churche IN the .xv. article they receyue the fyrste parte in which we say that those rites and ceremonies in the churche are to be obserued which may be obserued with out any syn and whiche helpe to the keping of tranquilite and good ordre in the churche The seconde parte they vtterly condempne in which we say that mans traditions instituted to appeace god to merite grace and to satisfy for synnes be contrary to the gospell Albeit in our confession coÌ„cernyng the choyse of meares we haue spoken many thynges ynough of traditions yet this natwithstaÌ„ding certayne thingê shal here brefly be repeted For although we thought that our aduersaries wolde for other causes defende the traditions of men yet we dyd nat thynke that euer they wolde haue coÌ„dempned this our article whiche is That we deserue nat forgiuenes of siÌ„nes or grace through the obseruyng of mennes traditions Syth therfore thys article is condempned we haue an easy and a playne cause Now our aduersaries do openly play the Iewes and do openly oppresse the gospell with deuillyshe doctrines For than dothe the scripture call tradicions the doctrines of deuyls wheÌ„ it is taught that they be seruices profitable to deserue remissioÌ„ of synnes and grace For then they endymme the gospel they minishe the benefite of Christ they annulle the iustice of faythe The gospel teacheth vs that we through faythe for Christes sake frely receiue remission of sinnes and be recoÌ„ciled to god Our aduersaries coÌ„trary wyse make another mediatour that is to wete these traditioÌ„s For the traditions sake they wyll obteine remission of sinnes by these they wyll appease the wrathe of god But Christe sayth openly They honour me in vayne with the coÌ„maundementes of men We haue herebefore largely disputed that men be iustified throughe faythe whan they beleue that they haue god pacified not for our workes but frelye for Christe This is vndoubtedly the doctrine of the gospell for Paule sayth playnly to the Ephesians Ye be freely saued through faythe and that not of your selues it is the gyfte of god and coÌ„methe not of men Nowe our aduersaries say that men deserue remission of synnes by these humane obseruaunces What other thyng is this than besides Christ to set vp a nother iustifier a nother mediator Paule saythe to the Galathians Ye be fallen from Christ ye whiche be iustified by the law â–ª that is to saye if ye thynke that by the obseruynge of the lawe ye deserue to be accompted ryghtuous in the syght of god Christe shall nothing auayle you For wherunto nede they Christ which thynke them selues to be ryghtuous by theyr owne obseruynge of the lawe God hath set forthe Christe vnto vs that for this mediatours sake and not for our iustices sake he wyll be mercyfull to vs. But these men thynke that god is pacified and made mercyfull for our traditions sake and not for Christê sake They take therfâ—â—e â—om Christ the honour and prerogatiue of a mediator Neyther is there any difference betwyxte our traditions the ceremonies of Moyses law as concernynge this matter Paule therfore condempneth the ceremonies of the lawe of Moyses lykewyse as he condempneth traditions bicause they were iudged to be workes whiche dyd merite iustice in the syght of god by reason wherof the benefite of Christe and the iustice of faythe were obscured wherfore he putteth awaye the lawe he puttethe awaye traditions and proueth playnlye that not for these workes sake but for Christis sake remission of synnes is freelye promysed so that by faythe we receyue it For asmoche therfore as by faythe ne receyue remission of synnes and syth through faythe we haue god mercyfull and fauourable to vs for Christis sake it is playne errour and heresy to decree that by these obseruauÌ„ces we deserue remission of sinnes If any man do here say that we deserue not by these traditions remission of synnes but that we being alredy iustified do by these traditions deserue grace here agayne Paule cryeth agaynst hym sayeng that Christ shuld be the minister of synne if after iustification it were to be thoughte that afterwardes we be not reputed ryghtuous for Christis sake but that fyrst we ought by other obseruations to deserue to be reputed ryghtuous Also to a testament made by man nothynge ought to be added Ergo to the testament of god whiche promysethe that for Christis sake he wyll be mercyfull vnto vs it oughte not to be added that fyrste by these obseruations we ought to merite to be reputed acceptable ryghtuous Howbeit wherto nedethe any longe disputation No tradition hath ben instituted by the holy fathers for this entent that it shulde merite forgyuenes of synnes but they haue ben instituted for cause of good ordre to be had in the churche and for cause of traÌ„quilitie And though any man wolde institute certeyn workes to deserue remission of synnes or ryghtuousnes howe shall he know that those warkê please god whan he hath no testimonie or witnes of the worde of god Howe shall he make men assured of the wyll of god withoute the coÌ„maundement and worde of god Dothe not god euerywhere in the prophetes forbydde to institute any peculiar maner of honour or seruice without his coÌ„mauÌ„dement In Ezechiel it is wryten thus In the preceptes of your fathers do ye not walke neyther do ye kepe theyr iudgementes ne be ye polluted with the ydoles of them I am your lorde god â–ª walke in my preceptes and kepe my iudgementes and worke ye them If it be laufull for men to institute worshyppyngê or seruice and by the sayde seruices they merite grace â–ª than shall the honourynge seruice of all nations be to be allowed than the honours instituted by Ierohoam other without the lawe shal be to be approued For what difference is there if it hath ben laufull for vs to institute seruices profitable to merite grace or iustice whye was not the same thynge laufull to the gentyles and to the chyldren of Israel But therfore were the honours of the Gentyles and of the Israelites disalowed because they thought them selues by the sayde honours to merite remission of sinnes and iustice and dyd not knowe the iustice of fayth Finally wherby be we made sure that honours or seruices instituted by men without the coÌ„maundement of god do iustifie For of the wyll pleasure of god nothynge can be affermed without the worde of god What if god dothe not accepte ne allowe these seruices Howe than do oure aduersaries afferme that they iustifie sythe this thynge can
god And neyther Christe nor Paule do prayse virginitie therfore because it dothe iustifie but because it is lesse combred and hathe fewer cares belonging to it and is lesse letted with domesticall occupations and busynesses in prayeng in teaching in doing seruice to god Therfore sayth Paule The virgine carith for those thinges whiche be the lordes Uirginitie then is praysed for the excercise and study So Christe dothe nat absolutely and generally prayse all them whiche do gelde them selues but he addethe for the kyngdome of heuen that is for to say that they may haue leysure to learne or to teache the gospell For he dothe nat say that virginitie dothe merite remission of sinnes or saluation To the examples of the leuitical prestes we haue aunswered that they proue nat that prestes ought to be bounde to abstayne from mariage all theyr lyfe tyme agayne the leuitical vncleÌ„nesses ought not to be applyed to vs. A custome agaynst the lawe was then vnclennes Nowe suche custome is nat vnclennes for Paule sayeth All thynges be cleane to them that be cleane For the gospell deliuereth vs and maketh vs free froÌ„ these leuitical impurities And if any man dothe defende the lawe of abstaynyng from mariage to the ende to charge lade consciences with those leuiticall obseruaunces that man ought to be resisted in lykewyse as the apostles dyd resyste them whiche required circumcision and whiche went aboute to laye the burdon of Moses lawe vpoÌ„ christeÌ„ meÌ„nes neckes In the meane season yet good men knowe howe to moderate the carnall vse and company of theyr wyues namely when they be busyed with publycke ministeries and offices apperteynynge to the comen weale with whiche good men be often tymes so busied troubled that they do caste the thoughtes cares coÌ„cernyng theyr house out of theyr myndê Good men knowe this also that Paule dothe bydde vs to possesse our vessels in saÌ„ctification They knowe also that somtime they ought to go a sondre to the entente that they may the better gyue theyr mynde to prayer but Paule wyl nat that they shulde kepe in sondre coÌ„tinually Nowe suche maner continencie is easy to them that be good men and occupied But that greate multitude of ydle prestes whiche be in Collegies can nat fulfill so muche as thys leuiticall continencie they lyue in so greate welthe and pleasures as experieÌ„ce sheweth dayly And these verses of the Poete be knowen wel ynough Desidiam puer ille sequi solet odit agentes that is to saye That luste and desyre of bodyly pleasure is wonte to folowe slouthfulnes but it hateth those that he busy and doyng Many heretikê throughe the mysunderstandynge of the forsayd lawe of Moyses haue had contumelious and shamefull opinions of wedlocke And suche were the Encratites of whom we haue spoken before And it is vndoubted and euidently knowen that monkes and freers haue ben wonte to sowe and sprede abrode euerywhere many superstitious sentences concernyng single lyfe whiche sentences haue troubled many godly consciences euen because of the laufull vse of matrimony And it shulde be no harde thynge for vs to reherse and tell examples For albeit they dyd nat vtterly condempne matrimony because of procreation yet they dyd dysprayse it as a kynde of lyuiÌ„g whiche scarcely at any tyme dothe please god or at the leaste wyse shulde nat please god but only because of procreation But single lyfe they dyd extolle and magnifie as an angelical kynde of liuing This they preached to be the moste pleasaunte sacrifice vnto god to merite remission of synnes to merite garlondes or crownes to brynge forthe the hundreth folde frute and other thinges out of nombre These religions of aungelles Paule dothe greately improue wryting to the Collossians For they do oppresse the knoweledge of Christe when men do thiÌ„ke that they be reputed ryghtuous for suche maner obseruaunces and nat for Christê sake they oppresse also the knowlege of the coÌ„mauddementes of god whan besides the preceptê of god newe ceremonies and seruices be deuised and preferred before the coÌ„maundementes of god Wherfore these superstitious opinions concernynge single lyfe be diligently to be resisted to th entent that both godlye consciences maye knowe what maner honours and seruice god dothe approue But in dede oure aduersaries do not require single lyfe through any suê‘stition For they know that chastitie is not wonte to be kepte But they cloke theyr busynes with superstitious opinions to the entent that they maye begyle the simple and vnlerned ê‘sones They be therfore more worthye of hatered than the Encratites whiche seme to haue fallen in to errour thrughe a certeyne apparaunce of holynes But these voluptuous felowes do purposely abuse the pretence of religion Sixtely though we haue so many causes of disprouynge the lawe of perpetuall abstinence from maryage yet besydê these causes there be many ieopardies of soules and open sâ—launders and occasions of hurte whiche althoughe the lawe were not vnryghtuous yet it ought to feare away good men from the approuynge of suche maner of burden whiche hath destroyed innumerable soules All good men haue complayned longe of this burden as wel for theyr owne cause as for other mennes cause whom they dyd se to be in ieoê‘die But these complaintes no byshops do heare And it is not vnknowen howe greatelye this lawe dothe hurte the comen and publyke maners what vices what vngratious kyndes of lecherye it hath engendred and broughte vp There be yet remayniÌ„g the Romayn satyres In these satyres Rome euen these dayes also dothe knowe and espie her maners touched Thus god auengeth and ponysheth the contempte and despisinge of his gyfte and of his ordenaunce in those persones whiche forbyd wedlocke And sythe in other lawes the custome hath ben to chaunge them if euidente vtilitie haue so required why do they not the same in this lawe in whiche there be so many weyghtye causes rennynge together namely these last dayes why it ought to be chauÌ„ged Nature waxeth olde is made daylye weyker and weyker and vices do encrease wherfore the remedies taughte and gyuen by god were the more to be vsed We see what vice god dothe accuse before the floode what vice he dothe accuse before the brennyng of the fyue Cities Lyke vices haue gone before the destructions of many other cities as of Sybaris of Rome And in these is set forthe an ymage or similitude of the tymes whiche shal be nexte to the worldes ende Therfore principally at this tyme they ought to strengthen to fortifie wedlocke with most sharpe lawes and ensamples to prouoke men to weâ—lock This apperteyneth to the heade officers and rulers whiche oughte to maynteyne good ordre in a comen â—eale In the meane season the preachers and teachers of the gospell let them do both two thynges I meane let them exhorte those that be vncoÌ„tineÌ„t to wedlocke and agayne let them exhorte other that they do not despise the gyfte of continence The byshops of Rome do
dayly dispense do dayly chaunge other lawes yea althoughe alredye they be very good but in this one lawe of absteinyng from maryage they he as harde herted as yron and wyll not be entreated albeit euery man knowethe that it is onely mannes lawe And this selfe same lawe they do nowe aggrauate and make more streyte many ways The can on lawe byddeth to suspende preestê the byshops beinge cruell interpreters of the lawe do suspende them not from theyr office but they hange them vp by the neckes vpon trees They kylle many good men cruellye onelye because of maryage And these selfe murders do shewe and declare that this lawe is a doctrine of deuylles For the deuyll for asmoche as he is a manqueller defendeth his lawes with suche murders We knowe that there be some offeÌ„ded by the occasion that we seme â—o be deuided from them whiche be estemed to be the ordinarie byshops but our consciences is safe and oute of ieoperdie For as moche as we knowe that althoughe we desyre with all labour diligence to make concorde yet we can in no wyse pacifie our aduersaries onles we wolde cast away the manifest truth and also oneles we wolde conspire with them to defende this vnryghtuous law to dissolue and breake matrimonies to slee preestê if any refuse to obeye to dryue selye poore women and fatherles chyldren in to exile as ê‘sones banyshed But for asmoche as it is vndoubted that these conditions and lawes of peace do displease god let vs be sory neuer a deale though we haue not felowshyp nor be parteners with or aduersaries of so many murders We haue declared the causes why we can not with good coÌ„science agree vnto our aduersaries whiche defende the popes lawe made coÌ„cernynge perpetuall absteynynge from maryage that is to witte because it is repugnante and contrarye to goddes lawe to the lawe of nature and disagreeth also from the canones and besydes this is superstitious and full of ieoperdie Finally because all the hole matter is but fayned and hypocriticall For this lawe is not coÌ„maunded because of any vertue or holynes but because of lordshyp and domination And this they wyckedlye cloke and shadowe vnder the pretence of goddê honour Neyther can there be any thynge brought of any wyse man agaynst these stronge reasons The gospel gyueth to them which haue nede licence and libertie for to marye And yet it dothe not compelle those to marye whiche be wyllynge and disposed to conteyne so that they conteyne and lyue chaste in very dede This libertie we thynke ought to be grauÌ„ted vnto preestes also neyther wyll we compell any mâ—n by violence to kepe hym selfe vnmaryed neither yet dissolue ne breake the maryages whiche be alredye made We haue also incidently whyles we rehersed our owne argumentes shewed and declared howe our aduersaries do dally awey and elude one or two of the argumentes with cauyllations whiche cauillations we haue wyped away auoyded Now we shall briefly reherse with how stroÌ„ge reasons they defende this lawe Fyrst they say that it came from god by reuelation Ye se thextreame boldenes of these lewde felowes They be not affrayde to afferme that the lawe of perpetuall absteinyng from maryage was shewed from god by reuelation whaÌ„ it is contrarie to the manifeste testimonies of the scripture whiche do byd that euerye man shulde haue his owne wyfe for than oydynge of fornication whiche also do forbyd to dissolue or breake matrimonies yâ— be contracted Paule shewethe what auctour and maker this law shuld haue whaÌ„ he calleth it the doctrine of deuylles And the frutes also declare who is the auctor so many monstruous kyndes of bodely luste so many murders which nowe be receiued vnder the couerte clooke of yâ— law The seconde argument of our aduersaries is that preestê ought to be cleane accordyng to that texte of scripture Mundamini qui fertis uasa domini that is to say Be ye made cleane whiche do beare the vessels of the lorde And they alledge many other thynges accordyng to the same purpose This reason of which they bragge as moste apparaunte glorious of al other we haue auoyded here before For we haue sayde that virginitie without faythe is no cleÌ„nes in the syght of god And on the other syde that wedlocke by reason of faythe is clene accordyng to that texte Omnia mundâ— mundis All thynges be cleane to them that be cleane We haue sayde this also that the outwarde clennesses and ceremonies of the lawe be not to be traÌ„slated and applyed to this ausines For the gospell requireth cleÌ„nes of the herte it dothe not require the ceremonies of the lawe And it maye be so that the herte of a maryed man as of Abraham or of Iacob whiche had many wyues is more cleane and doth lesse brenne with wanton lustes than the hertes of many virgines yea whiche do lyue chaste in very dede And as touchyng to that which Esaie sayth Se that ye be made clene which do beare the vessels of the lorde This sayenge ought to be vnderstanded of clennes of herte and of hole repentaunce But holy men as touchiÌ„g the outwarde vse shall knowe well ynough howe farforth it shal be expedieÌ„t to measure the vse of wedlock and as Paule saythe to possesse theyr vessels in sanctification Finally sythe it is so that wedlocke is cleane it were well sayde to them whiche in single lyfe lyue not chaste to bydde them marye wyues that they maye be cleane So the selfe same law Se that ye be made clene whiche beare the vessels of the lorde dothe commauÌ„de that vnclene single men shuld be made cleane and pure maryed men The thyrde argumeÌ„t is horrible and fearefull that is to say that it is the heresie of Iouinian that preestes shulde haue wyues God forbyd this is a newe accusation that wedlock is heresie In the tyme of Iouinian the worlde knewe not yet this lawe of perpetuall absteynyng from matrimonie it is therfore a shamefull lye to saye that the wedlocke of preestes is the heresie of Iouinian or that than the wedlocke of preestê was coÌ„dempned by the churche In suche maner places as this a man may see what purpose and entente our aduersaries had in wrytyng the confutation They iudged that the simple and vnlerned men be so very sone moued and styrred if they heare of the foule reproche of heresie if they do imagine that our cause hath ben confuted coÌ„dempned in tymes passed by many iudgementes of the churche Therfore they do often tymes falsely alledge the iugemente of the churche And because they knowe this wel ynough they wolde not exhibete vnto vs a copie of the confutation leste this vanitie leste these false lyes myght be reproued And as touchiÌ„g the cause of Iouinian of the comparison of virginitie and wedlocke we haue sayde our mynde heretofore what we thynke For we do not make wedlocke and virginitie egall and
the lawe and therfore he sayeth After that he shall haue gyuen hys lyfe an hoste or sacrifice for synnes he shal se sede or posteritie of longe contynuaunce c. For the hebrue worde whiche Esaie dothe vse in this place betokenith sacrifice for syn whiche sacrifice iÌ„ the lawe dyd betoken that there was a certayne hoste or sacrifice to come whiche shulde make satisfaction for our synnes and shulde recoÌ„cile god to the ende that men shulde knowe that nat for our owne ryghtuousnes but for the merites of another that is to wete of Iesu Christe god is wyllyng to be reconciled to vs. Paule expoundeth the same hebrue worde to signifie or betoken synne in the viii chapitre to the Romaynes sayenge By synne he condempned synne that is to saye â—e punyshed synne by the hoste or sacrifice offred for synne The signification and strengthe of the worde may be more easely perceiued by the maners of the gentiles whiche we se to haue bene taken of the wordes of the fathers nat ryghtly vnderstaÌ„ded Latine men dyd cal piaculuÌ„ that hoste or sacrifice whiche was offred in greate calamities to pacifie the wrathe of god when god semed to be excedingly angry and sometime they made sacrifice with maÌ„nes bloude because peraduenture they had herâ—e that the sacrifienge of a man shulde in tyme cuÌ„myng appease god to all mankynde The Grekes haue called them in some place Catharmata and in some place Peripsemata Esaie therfore and Paule do vnderstaÌ„de that Christ was made an oblatioÌ„ or sacrifice suche as latine men do call Piaculum that by hys merites and nat by ours god shulde be reconciled Let this therfore remayne and abyde in the cause that onely the deathe of Christe is the very true ê“pitiatorie sacrifice For those leuiticall propitiatorie sacrifices were called so onely to signifie the verie propitiatorie sacrifice that was to come And therfore by a certayne similitude and lykenes they were satisfactions redemynge the iustice of the lawe leste they which had offeÌ„ded shulde be excluded from that comen weale But these sayde sacrifices ought to cease after that the gospel was ones reueled and brought to lyght And because they ought to cease at the tyme of the reuelation of the gospell they were nat verie propitiations sythe the gospell was therfore promysed to gyue and shewe propitiation Nowe remayne only Eucharistical sacrifices whiche be called sacrifices of prayse preachyng of the gospel faythe inuocatioÌ„ thaÌ„kê gyuing confession the afflictions of holy meÌ„ yea al good workes of sayntes These sacrifices be nat satisfactions for the doers of them or satisfactions that may be applied for other folke whiche may meritie vnto them remissioÌ„ of synnes or reconciliation by the vertue of the worke wrought For they be done of them that be alredy reconciled And suche maner sacrifices be the sacrifices of the newe testamente as Peter teacheth in his fyrste epistle sayeng To an holye presthod that ye shulde offre spirituall hoostes and sacrifices Howe spirituall sacrifices be set agaynst as coÌ„trary not onely to the sacrificing of beastes but also to the workes of men whiche be offred because of the worke wroughte For this worde spirituall betokenethe motions of the holye ghoste in vs. Paule teacheth the same whan he saythe Offre your bodyes as a quicke sacrifice holye and a reasonable seruice But by reasonable seruice or honour is betokened that seruice in whiche god is vnderstanded and perceyued in the mynde as is done in the motions of feare and of truste towardes god Therfore it is not onely set agaynst the leuiticall honour or seruice in whiche beastê were slayne but also that honour or seruice in whiche is fayned a worke to be offered by the vertue of the worke wrought The same thynge dothe the epistle to the Hebrues teache whiche saythe By hym let vs offre sacrifice of prayse alwayes vnto god and he addethe the interpÌ„tation that is to witte the frute of lyppes coÌ„fessyng his name He byddeth vs offre prayses that is to say inuocation thaÌ„kes gyuyng confession or knowlegyng of his name and other semblable thynges These thyngê be of strengthe not by the vertue of the worke wroughte but by the meanes of faythe And this teacheth this ê‘ticle by him let vs offre that is to say by faythe in Christe Breuely the seruice and worshyppyng coÌ„maunded by the newe testament is spiritual that is to say is iustice of faythe in the herte and the frutes of faythe Therfore it dothe abrogate the leuiticall sacrifices And Christe saythe The true worshyppers shall worshyppe the father in spirite and truthe For suche worshyppers wolde the father haue to worshyp hym God is a spirite they that â—orshyp hym muste worshyp hym in spirite and truthe This texte clerely condempneth the opinions of all suche sacrifices whiche they fayne to be of strengthe by the reason of the worke wrought And it teacheth also that we muste worshyp in spirite yâ— is to say with motions of the herte and faythe Therfore the prophetê also in the olde testament coÌ„dempne the opinion of the people whiche they had of the worke wrought and do teache ryghtuousnes sacrifices of the spirite For thus sayth the prophete Hieremie I haue not spoken with your fathers nor I haue not gyuen them coÌ„maundement in that daye whan I broughte them out of Aegipte of any sacrifices But this worde I coÌ„mauÌ„ded them sayeng Heare and obey my wordes and I wyll be your god c. After what fashyon shulde we thynke that the Iewes dyd herken receyue this sermon whiche semeth to be clene repugnant and contrarye to the lawe of Moyses For this was vndoubtedly knowen that god had gyuen coÌ„maundement to the fathers of diuerse maner sacrifices But Hieremie condempneth the opinion whiche they had of sacrifices This opinion god dyd neuer teathe them yâ— is to witte that those sacrifices shuld pacifie hym by the worke wrought He addeth also faythe that god had coÌ„maunded it whan he sayth Herken me that is to say beleue me that I am your god that I wyl so be knowen whan I do shewe mercy and whaÌ„ I do helpe and yâ— I haue no nede of your sacrifices truste surely that I wyll be god a iustifier a sauiour not for your workes sake but for my worde and my promyse sake desyre loke for helpe of me truelye and from your hartes The psalme also dothe condempne the opinion of the worke wroughte whiche refusynge the sacrifice of beastes requireth inuocation â–ª and the sacrifice of prayse For thus it sayth Shall I eate the flesshe of bulles of gotes c. Call vpon me in the tyme of tribulation and I wyll delyuer the and thou shalte worshyp and honoure me c. Here he witnesseth that this is the very latria the very true honour if we do hertely call vpon hym Also in the .xxxix. psalme it is wryten Sacrifice oblation thou woldest none of but thou haste made
called Aerius whom they saye was condempned because he dyd deny that in the masse oblation was made bothe for quicke and deade This colour they vse often tymes they alledge olde heresies with them they falsely compare our cause to the entent that with suche comparison they myght make vs more hated Epiphanius witnessith that the opinion of Aerius was that prayers for deade men be vnprofitable This opinion Epiphanius reproueth Neyther do we defende Aerius but we stryue with you which wyckedly defende an heresy manifestly contrary to the sayeng of the prophetes apostles and holy fathers that is to wete that the masse by the vertue of the worke wroughte dothe iustifie and that it dothe merite remission of synnes as they call it a pena et culpa euen also to vnrightuous men for whom it is applied if they make no stoppe or impediment of theyr owne parte These poysoned errours we disalowe whiche minishe the glorye of the passion of Christ and vtterly oppresse the doctrine of the iustice of faythe Suche lyke persuasion hadde the wycked Iewes in the lawe that they merited remission of sinnes by theyr sacrifices throughe the vertue of the worke wrought dyd nat receiue it frely by faythe Therfore they encreaced those ceremonies and sacrifices they ordeyned the honouryng of Baal in Israel in Iurie also they made sacrifice in the halowed woodes Wherfore the prophetes condempnyng this persuasion dyd warre nat onely with those worshyppers of Baal but also with other prestê whiche made the sacrifices ordeined by god with that wycked opinion But this persuasion cleauith in the worlde and shall cleaue alwayes I meane that ceremonies and sacrifices be redemptioÌ„s of synnes Carnall men do nat suffre this honoure to be gyuen onely to the sacrifice of Christ that it is the very raunsome and propitiation because they perceiue nat the iustice of faythe but gyue egall honour to other seruices and sacrifices Therfore lykewyse as in Iurye there stycked a false persuasion among the wycked bysshops concernyng sacrifices and lykewyse as in Israell there coÌ„tinued the worshipping of Baal and other lyke And yet neuertheles was the churche of god amonge them whiche dyd dysalowe and rebuke those wycked sacrifices and seruices So lykewyse in the kyngdome of the pope there remaineth the worshyppyng of Baal that is to saye the abuse of the masse whiche they applye to the ende that they may by it merite to vnrightuous men remission of synne and of punyshmeÌ„t for siÌ„ne And this worshyppyng of Baal with the Popes kyngdome is lykely to coÌ„tinue vntyll Christe shal come to iudge and vntyl the tyme that the glorie of his commyng shall destroye the kyngedome of Antichriste In the meane season all that truly beleue the gospell ought to improue and rebuke those wicked seruices and worshyppinges deuised agaynst the coÌ„maundement of god to obscure and dymme the glory of Christe and the iustice of faythe These thynges we haue spoken breffly coÌ„cerning the masse to the entent that al good men in what couÌ„trey soeuer they dwel may knowe and vnderstande that we with greate affectioÌ„ and diligence defeÌ„de the dignitie of the masse and shewe the right vse of it and that we haue moste rightuous causes to dissent and disagre from our aduersaries And here we wolde that all good men toke admonition and counsayle that they do nat helpe our aduersaries which defende the prophanation and abusyng of the masse leaste they charge them selues with the feloushyp of other mennes synne This is no tryflynge matter but a wayghty cause and a greate busynes yea no lesse then that busines of Elie the prophete whiche did improue and vehemently rebuke the honourynge of Baal Yet we haue set forthe this so greate a matter myldely and coldely and we haue nowe made answere without raylyng or euyll wordes But if our aduersaries do prouoke vs to gather together all kyndes of theyr abusynges of the masse the matier shall nat be so myldly handeled ⧠Of abbey vowes ⧠WIth vs in a certayne towne of Turingia called IsenacuÌ„ more thaÌ„ thyrty yeres ago there was a certayn freer of saynt FrauÌ„cê ordre IohnÌ„ Hilten by name whiche of his owne companye was caste into pryson bycause that he had rebuked certayne very notorious abuses For we haue sene the workes whiche he wrote by whiche it may be wel ynough perceyued what maner doctrine it was that he taught And they whiche knewe hym reporte of him that he was a gentle olde man sadde without any waywardnes This IohnÌ„ shewed before many thyngê whiche partly haue come to passe al redy and partly seme to be nere at hande whiche thyngê we wyl nat recite leaste any man wolde interprete them to be rehersed eyther of displeasure and euille wyl towardes some persone or elles of fauour and for the pleasure of some man But in coÌ„clusion when eyther by reason of age or of fylthynes of the prysoÌ„ he was fallen into disease and sickenes he sent for the wardeyn of the place to come vnto him that he myght gyue him knowledge of his infirmitie and sycknes When the wardeyn enflamed with pharisaical harred agaiÌ„st hym had begonne to chyde with hym and to rebuke hym sharpely for his doctrine whiche semed to be agaynst the proffettes of the ketchyn than this IohnÌ„ leauynge the mention of his infirmitie and beinge inwardlye sorye and syghynge sayde that he was ryghte well coÌ„tentid to suffre al those iniuries for Christê sake For he had neyther wryten nor taughte any thynge that myghte appayre or hurte the state of religious men he onelye rebuked he sayde certayne abuses notoriouslye knowen But there shall another come sayd he in the yere of our lorde god M.D.xvj. whiche shall destroye you neyther ye shall be able 〈◊〉 resiste hym This sentence concernyng the decaye of the kyngedome of religious men and the nuÌ„bre also of the yeres his frendê afterwardê dyd fynde also wryten in his workes amonge the annotatioÌ„s whiche he had lefte vpon certeyne places of Daniel And thoughe howe moche this sayeng is to be regarded the ê“ffe of the thyng shall declare yet be there other signes and tokens as sure and as vndoubted as the gospell is whiche threaten a chaunge to come vnto the kyngdome of freers other religious ê‘sones For it is euidently knowen howe moch hipocrisy there is in abbeys how greate ambition howe greate couetousnes howe moche blyndenes and ignoraunce and how moche crueltie of euery vnlerned foole howe greate vanitie in sermones how greate crafte in imaginyng often tymes newe wayes to get money And there be other vices also besydes these whiche I lyst not at this tyme â—o reherse And where as in old tyme abbeys were the scholes of Christis doctrine nowe they be growen out of kynde as it were from a golden kynde to an yirnye kynde bryngyng nothynge els but myschiefe and destruction The rychest monasteries onely fynde and norysshe an ydle multitude whiche there vnder false
pretence of religion fylle theyr bellyes and playe the cormorauntes vpon the comon almoyse of the churche But Christ teacheth vs of the vnsauery salte that it is wonte to be cast out and troden vnder the foote wherfore religious men with these maners synge theyr owne destinye And besydes all this there is another token nowe whiche is that they be euery where the causers and couÌ„sellers of puttynge good men to deathe These murders no doubte of it god wyll shortelye reuenge and ponyshe Neyther do we here accuse all religious men For we suppose that euerye where there be some good men in monasteries whiche thynke but measurably of humayne ceremonies and seruices and whiche do not allowe the crueltie whiche hypocrites exercise and vse But we dispute of the kynde of doctrine whiche the chiefe deuisours of the coÌ„futation nowe defende not whether vowes oughte to be kepte for we thynke that laufull vowes be to be kepte but whether those seruices ceremonies merite remission of synnes and iustificatioÌ„ whether they be satisfactioÌ„s for sinnes whether they be egall to baptisme whether they be the fulfyllyng both of the coÌ„maundementes and of the counsaylles whether they be the euangelicall perfection whether they haue merites of superogation whether those merites applyed to other men may saue them to whom they be so applyed whether the vowes be laufull which be made with these opinions whether the vowes be lauful whiche vnder the cloke and pretence of religion be taken onely for the entent to fylle the belly and to liue in ydlenes and ease whether those be true vowes which men be compelled to make agaynste theyr wylles or els be made of suche that were not of full age to iudge of the maner and kynde of lyuynge whiche haue ben thrust in to monasteries by theyr parentê or theyr frendes to th entent that they myght be founde and haue theyr lyuynge of the comen coste without any hynderaunce of theyr owne puate patrimonie whether those vowes be laufull whiche openlye encline to an euyll ende eyther because they be not kepte thrugh infirmitie and weykenes or els because they whiche be in those felyshyps and companies be coÌ„pelled to approue and to helpe forwardê the abusions of masses the wycked honoryng of sayntes the counselles of ragyng and exercisynge crueltie agaynst good men Of these questions we dispute And though we haue in our coÌ„fession spoken many thingê of suche maner vowes which also the canons of the popes improue and disallowe yet our aduersaries byd that al that we haue brought forthe shulde be reiected For these wordes they haue vsed And it is a worlde to se howe they cauillate and tryfle away our reasons what they briÌ„ge to the defence fortifieng of theyr owne cause Wherfore we shall briefely ouer a certein fewe of our argumentê ronne in them we shal by the way make answere and auoyde the cauillations of our aduersaries And for asmoche as this hole mater hath ben diligently and plentuously handeled of Martine Luther in his boke entitled of Monasticall vowes we wyll become here but a reporter and repeter of that boke Fyrste of all â–ª this is moste certeyne and vndoubted that it is no laufull vowe by whiche he that maketh the vowe doth thynke that he deseruethe remission of synnes before god or that he satisfieth for synnes before god For this opinioÌ„ is a manifest iÌ„iurie to the gospel whiche teachethe that remission of synnes is freelye gyuen vs for Christis sake As it hath ben saide largely heretofore We haue therfore well alledged the place of Paule to the Galathians Ye be voyde from Christe who soeuer be iustified by the law ye be fallen from grace Who soeuer seke remission of synnes not by fayth in Christ but by moÌ„kyshe workê they mynyshe the honour of Christ crucifie Christe agayne But berken I praye you herken how the deuisours of the confutation wade out here They expoune this place of saynt Paule only of the lawe of Moyses and they adde yâ— religious men obserue all thyngê for Christis sake and go aboute to lyue more nere to the rule of the gospell in suche sorte that they may merite eternall lyfe And they adde an horrible conclusion in this wyse sayinge wherfore all these thynges be wycked which be alledged agaynst the religious lyfe O Christ howe longe wylte thou suffre these iniuries and dishonours whiche our enemies do vnto thy gospell We sayde in the confession that remission of synnes is freely receyued for Christê sake by faythe If this be not the very sayenge of the gospell if this be not the sentence of the eternal father which thou o moste mercyfull Christ that arte in thy fathers bosome dydest shewe to the worlde we be ryghtefully punyshed But thy deathe is witnesse thy resurrection is witnes the holy ghost is witnesse thy hole churche is witnes that this is the very sentence of the gospell that we obteyne remission of synnes not for our owne merites but for thy sake by faythe Paule whan he sayth that men do not merite remission of synnes by the lawe of Moyses taketh awaye moche rather this prayse from the traditioÌ„s of men And this he wytnesseth openlye to the Collosianes If the lawe of Moyses whiche was gyuen by god dyd not merite remission hf synnes howe moche lesse than do these folysshe obseruaunces disagreinge from the ciuile custome and maner of lyuynge merite remission of synnes Our aduersaries fayne that Paule dothe abrogate the lawe of Moyses and that Christ dothe so succede the lawe that he dothe not freelye gyue remission of synnes but for the workes of other lawes if any be now deuised With this wycked and madde opinion they vtterly drowne the benefite of Christe Furthermore they fayne that amonge them whiche obserue that lawe of Christ religious men more nearely obserue it than other men because of theyr hypocriticall and cloked pouertie chastitie and obedience whan all that euer they do or say is full of simulation They bragge and boste of pouertie beinge in moste hygh abundance of all maner thynges They boste of theyr obedieÌ„ce whan no kynde of men hath more libertie than religious men Of theyr single lyfe I lyst not to speake whiche howe cleane and pure it is in moste parte of them that study to kepe them selues chast one Gerson in his boke shewethe And howe many be there I praye you whiche studye to lyue chaste Be ye sure with this hypocrisie and similation religious men lyue more neare vnto the rule of the gospell Christ doth not so succede Moyses that for our workes sake he forgyueth sinnes but yâ— he doth set his own meritê his owne ê“pitiation agaiÌ„st the wrathe of god for vs that we myght frely be forgyueÌ„ But who soeuer besydes the propitiation of Christ doth pleade his owne merites agaynst the wrathe of god goth about for his owne merites to purchase remission of synnes whether he
alledge yâ— auctoritie of scripture and say that this theyr decree is expressed in the scriptures Besydes this they do iniurie and dishonour to Christe in sayenge that meÌ„ by Monastical lyfe do merite eternal lyfe God dothe not gyue this honoure no not to his owne lawe that it shulde merite eternall lyfe as he hym selfe sayth playnly in the .xx. chapitre of Ezechiel I gaue vnto them preceptes that were not good and iudgementes in whiche they shall not lyue Fyrste this is vndoubted that monkyshe lyfe dothe not merite remission of synnes but that we freely receâ—ue it by fayth as it hath ben said before SecoÌ„dly this also is wryten that for Christê sake thrughe mercye is gyuen eternall lyfe to them whiche by fayth receyue remission and pleade not theyr owne merites agaynste the iudgement of god as Barnarde most grauely and wysely dothe say It is necessarye saythe he fyrst of all to beleue that remission of synnes can not be obteyned nor had but by goddes indulgence and pardone Secundarilye that thou cannest haue no good worke onles he gyueth it vnto the. Finally that thou can nest not by no maner workes merite eternall lyfe oneles it also be freelye gyuen Other thynges that folowe concernynge the same senteÌ„ce we haue heretofore recited And Barnarde addeth in the ende these wordê Let no man deceyue hym selfe For if he coÌ„sidre wel he shall fynde without any doubte that he is not able no not with tenne thousandê to mete hym which cometh agaynst hym with twenty thousandes Sythe than it is so that not so moche as by the workes of goddê law we can merite remission of sinnes or eternall lyfe but it is necessary to seke the mercy promysed in Christ moche lesse is suche honour to be gyuen to Monasticall obseruauÌ„ces seinge theyr be nothynge elles but traditions of men that they shulde deserue remission of synnes or eternall lyfe Thus they vtterly destroye and burye the gospell of free remission of synnes and of receyuiÌ„g the mercy ê“mysed in Christ who soeuer teache yâ— the monkyshe lyfe dothe merite remission of synnes or eternall lyfe and they translate the truste whiche is due to Christe vnto those folyshe obseruaunces In the stede of Christe they worshyp thyr owne coulles theyr owne fylthynes And in asmuch as they theÌ„ selues also do nede mercy they do wyckedly in that they fayne meriteâ— of super erogation and sell them to other We speake the more briefly of these thynges because by the matters whiche we haue spoken before of iustification of repentaunce of humayne traditions it is euident ynoughÌ„e that monasticall vowes be nat the pryce for which remission of synnes and eternall lyfe be gyueÌ„ And sythe it is so that Christ him selfe dothe call traditions vnprofitable honours and seruices they be in no wyse euaÌ„gelical perfectioÌ„ But our aduersaries wolde full wylyly seme to moderate the comen ê‘suasion of pefection They wyll nat say that monastical lyfe is perfection but they say it is the state of gettyng perfetion In faythe properly sayde and we remeÌ„bre that this correction is made in Gersones workes For it apperith that wyse men offendid with those vnmeasurable prayses of monastical lyfe because they durst nat vtterly take from it the prayse of perfection they addyd this correction that it is the state of gettyng perfection If we folowe this opinion so shall monastical lyfe be no whyt more the state of perfection than is the lyfe of the plouman or of the carpenter For these be also states of gettyng perfectioÌ„ For all men of whatsoeuer callynge they be oughte to desyre perfection that is to wete to growe and encrease in the feare of god in fayth in louing of thyr neyghbour and in lyke spirituall vertues We reade in histories examples of Eremites saynt Antony and other whiche make the kyndes of lyuyng egal one to another It is wryten that to Antony when he desyred of god to knowe howe muche he had profyted in this kynde of lyuynge there was shewed in his dreame a certayne shomaker dwellyng in the citie of Alexandrie to whom he was compared On the morowe after Antony coÌ„mith into the citye and goeth vnto the shomaker to searche and knowe his exercises and gyftes When he had spoken with the man he hearith nothynge of hym but that he dyd euery mornynge in fewe wordes pray for the hole citie and afterwardê dyd applye his crafte and occupation Here Antony perceiued that iustification is nat to be imputed to that sorte of lyuing whiche he had taken vpon hym and professed But our aduersaries although they now moderate the prayses of perfection yet in very dede they thynke otherwyse For they sell merites and apply them for other vndre this preteÌ„ce that they obserue bothe the preceptes and also the couÌ„sayles Wherfore in very dede they thinke that they haue merites mo then they nede What is to chaleÌ„ge ê‘fectioÌ„ vnto them selues if this be nat Furthermore it is put in the coÌ„futation that religious men labour to lyue more nere vnto the rule of the gospel It doth therfore put perfection in the traditions of men if religious men lyue more neare to the rule of the gospell because they haue nothing propre but all comen because they lyue without wyues because they obey theyr rule in garmentes meates and other lyke trifles Also the confutation sayeth that religious men merite more pleÌ„teously euerlasting lyfe it alledgith the scripture Qui reliquerit domaÌ„ c. Whosoeuer shal forsake house here god wote the scripture gyueth perfection to these counterfaited and fained religious But this place of scripture maketh nothynge for monasticall lyfe For Christe dothe nat meane that to forsake father and mother wyfe or breâ—herne is a worke therfore to be done because it dothe merite remission of synnes and eternall lyfe Yea that forsakyng is a cursed forsaking For it is done with the iniury of Christe if any maÌ„ wyl therfore forsake father or mother or wyfe thaâ— by this selfe worke he may merite remission of synnes and eternall lyfe But there be two maner of forsakynges one is done without callyng and without the coÌ„maundemente of god this forsaking and renouncing Christ alloweth nat For workê chosen of our selues be vnprofitable seruices And hereof it apperith more euideÌ„tly that Christ dothe nat loue this ronnyng away or forsakyng because he speakith of forsaking wyfe and chyldren But we knowe that the coÌ„maundement of god forbyddeth to forsake wyfe and chyldren There is another maner forsakynge whiche is done by the coÌ„maundement of god that is to wete when tyrauntes or they whiche haue auctoritie ouer vs compell vs to denye the gospell or â—o breake goddes coÌ„maundement Here in this case we haue coÌ„mauÌ„demeÌ„t that we shulde rather suffre wronge rather suffre nat onely our goodes our wyfe our chyldren to be takeÌ„ from vs but euen our lyfe also This maner renouÌ„cyng or forsakyng Christ dothe allowe and therfore he addith these wordes for the gospell
ben made hitherto be no vowes Wherfore that kynde of lyuyng may be safely ynough forsaken whiche is full of hypocrysye and of false opinions Here they obiecte agaynst vs and brynge out of the lawe the Nazareans But the Nazareans toke no vowes vpon them with these opinions whiche we sayde hytherto that we reproue in the vowes of religious men The rite and custome of the Nazareans was an exercise or protestation of theyr faythe before men it dyd not merite remission of synnes before god it dyd not iustifie before god Agayne lykewyse as nowe circuÌ„cision or sleynge of beastes in sacrifice shulde be none honour or seruice vnto god eueÌ„ so the rite and custome of the Nazarians ought not nowe to be sette forthe as an honour or seruice but it ought to be iudged nothing els but an indifferent thynge The Monasticall lyfe therfore which without the worde of god hath ben deuised to thentente that it shulde be a seruice wherwith to merite remission of synnes iustification is not wel compared and lykened to the custome of the Nazareans whiche had for it the worde of god and was not gyuen to merite remission of synnes but to be an exercise as the ceremonies of the lawe were The same may be sayde of other vowes taughte in the lawe There be alledged also the Rechabites whiche neyther had any possession neyther dyd drynke any wyne as Hieremie wryteth in the xxxv chapitre Then sample of the Rechabites agreeth full goodly be ye sure to oure monkes and freers whose Monasteries passe in sumptuousnes the palacies of kynges and whiche lyue moste delicately voluptuously But the Rechabites in that penurie of all thingê were yet maryed Our religious men whan they haue plentie of all maner delyces and pleasures do professe single lyfe But it were conuenient and mete to enterprete thexamples accordyng to the rule that is to wit accordyng to the vndoubted and euideÌ„t scriptures and not agaynst the rule scriptures Nowe this is moste sure and vndoubted that our obseruauÌ„ces merite not remission of synnes or iustification Wherfore sythe it is so that the Rechabites be praysed it must nedes be that they did not therfore kepe that maner and custome because they thought that by it they dyd merite remission of synnes or that the worke it selfe was a seruice or honour iustifienge or for whiche they shulde obteyne euerlastynge lyfe and not by the mercy of god for the sede that was promysed but because they had coÌ„maundement of theyr parentes therfore theyr obedieÌ„ce is coÌ„mended of whiche there is a coÌ„maundement of god whiche saythe Honoure thy father and thy mother Moreouer the custome had a propre ende of it self for it was vsed because they were strauÌ„giers and alienes and no Israelites and it appereth that theyr fathers wolde haue them dicerned by certeyn speciall markes and tokens from theyr owne countrey men to thentente that they shulde not fall agayne to the impietie wyckednes of theyr countrey men They wolde by these markes and signes put them in remeÌ„braunce of the doctrine of fayth and of immortalitie Suche maner ende or intente is laufull But the endes of cloyster lyfe be taught farre after another sorte They imagine that the workê of cloyster lyfe be seruices honours to god they fayne that they merite remission of synnes and iustification The example therfore of the Rechabites is vnlyke monasticall lyfe althoughe that we leaue out here many other incoÌ„modities and euylles whiche be ioyned and incideÌ„t to this monkyshe lyfe vsed nowe a dayes They alledge also forthe of the epistle to Timothe the place of wydowes whiche doinge seruice to the Churche had theyr lyuynge of the comen cost charge There Paule sayth They desyre to be wedded hauynge coÌ„demnation because they haue broken theyr fyrst ê“myse Fyrste lette vs imagyne that thapostle doth speake here of vowê yet this place shal not defende nor maynteyn Monastical vowê whiche be made of wycked ceremonies that also with this wycked opinion that they merite remission of synnes iustification For Paule with an hole voyce doth disallowe and condeÌ„ne all ceremonies all lawes al workê if they be obserued for suche purpose that they shulde merite remission of synnes or that for them we myghte obteyne eternal lyfe and not for Christis sake throughe mercy It ensueth therfore necessarily that the vowes of wydowes if there were any suche at al were farre vnlike to our monasticall vowes Besydes this if our aduersaries wyll not ceasse to wreste this place vnto wydowes this parte also of the texte muste be applyed to vowes that Paule forbyddeth a wydow to be chosen vndre thre score yeres of age So than vowes made before that age shal be voyde of no strengthe But the churche at that tyme knew not these maner of vowes Therfore Paule rebukethe wydowê not for that they wolde mary agayn For hym selfe byddethe yonge wydowes to be maryed but because they beinge founde of the comen coste and charge played the wantonnes and therfore dyd cast away theyr first fayth and promyse He calleth here the first faythe not the monasticall vowe but the promyse of christen lyfe And after the same fashyon he takethe faythe in the same chapitre whan he saythe If any dothe not care and ê“uyde for his owne namelye those of his owne house he hath renyed the fayth For he speaketh otherwyse of faythe than do sophisters he dothe not put faythe in them whiche be in deadely synne Therfore he saythe that they cast away fayth whiche do not care for theyr kynsfolke And accordyng to the same maner he saythe that wanton wydowes do caste awaye theyr faythe We haue ronne ouer breuely a fewe reasoÌ„s for our defense and by the way we haue made answere to the obiections of our aduersaries And these thynges we haue gathered together not onely for our aduersaries cause but moche rather for theyr sake which haue god lye and well disposed myndes to thentente that they may haue alwayes in theyr syghte causes why they ought to disproue and myslyke the hipochrisie and the fayned and couÌ„trefayte obseruaunces of abbey lyfe whiche altogether this one sayenge of Christ dothe defete whan he saythe They worshyp me in vayne with the coÌ„maundementes and traditioÌ„s of men Wherfore the vowes theÌ„ selues and the obseruaunces of meates of redynge of syngynge of garmentes of shoes and of gyrâ—els be vnprofitable seruices before god And let all godly myndes knowe this assured lye that it is a playne pharisaicall and a condempned opinion that those obseruaunces merite remission of synnes and that for them â—e be reputed ryghtuous or that for them we obteyn eternall lyfe not through mercy for Christis sake For it is necessary that all the sayntes and holy men whiche haue lyued in these kyndes of lyuynge dyd caste awaye all truste of suche maner obseruaunces and dyd learne that they had remission of synnes frelye for Christis sake and that