Gentlemen I shall begin to shew you that which all of you might remember that is your oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy and to add to this that obligation which all this whole Nation did oblige themselves to by the Parliament without question then rightly represented and in being the first of K. James whereby to shew you that not only persons but the Body politick of the Nations not only the single Members but the Members in both houses of Parliament were loyal and obedient subjects to the King their head even to yeeld a natural and humble Obedience and Allegiance I told you the Act of the 1. of K. James when K. James came first into Engl. We the Lords and Com. representing the whole People of the Nation the very words of the Act are so primo Jacobi Chapter the first Representing the whole Body of the Nation do acknowledge an humble natural Leige Obedience to the King as Supreme his Heirs and Successors And in the name of themselves and all the people humbly submit themselves untill the last drop of their bloud be spent in defence of the King and his Royall posterity and therefore they did oblige themselves and all the People of England as far as they could represent them the words are more full then I can express them and indeed it is so dark I cannot read them They did acknowledg to be bound to him and his Imperial Crown Remember these were not words of Complement you shall find that they all of them and so did so many of you as were Members of Parliament yea all of you before you came into the House of Commons did take the Oath of Allegiance which was made after this Recognition the third and fourth of King James or otherwise were not to be Members What was that Oath of Allegiance that you took it was That you should defend the King his Person that is in 3 Jacobi Chapter the fourth his Crown and Dignity What was it Not only against the Pope's Power to depose but the words are or otherwise look into the Act and reflect upon your Conscience and you shall find that all did swear to defend the King his Crown and Dignity and there it is called Imperial Crown I would have you lay this to heart and see how far you have kept this Oath Gentlemen In the Oath of Supremacy which you all took therein you did further acknowledg that the King was the only Supream Governour of this Realm Mark the words I will repeat them that you may lay it to heart you that have more time to apply it to your Fact and you that have less time for ought I know you have reason to consider what I have to say you sware then That the King by the Oath of Supremacy which all of you have taken or ought to have taken if any of you have not taken it yet notwithstanding you are not absolved from the obligation of it but most of you did take it there you sware that the King is the only Supream Governor of this Realm and you sware there that you would defend all Jurisdictions Priviledges Preeminencies and Authorities granted or belonging to the King's Highness His Heirs and Successors or united and annexed unto the Imperial Crown of this Realm For the first If the King be Supream then there is no co-ordination Non habet majorem non habet parem that word Imperial Crown is at least in nine or ten several Statutes it is the very word in this Act that was made lately in pursuance of former Acts concerning Judicial Proceedings And so in the time of King Charles they acknowledged him to be their Leige Sovereign I say that word Supream and so the word Imperial Crown is in the first of Queen Elizabeth the third and the eighth of Elizabeth the twenty fourth of Henry the Eighth Chap. 12. there it is said this Kingdom is an Imperial Crown subject to none but God Almighty Before these times you shall find in the sixteenth of Richard the Second the Statute of Praemunire the Crown of England subject to God alone I will go higher William Rufus some of you are Historians and you shall find the same in Eadmerus and also in Matthew Paris shortly after William Rufus his Time when he wrote to the Pope he challenged and had the same liberty in this Kingdom of England as the Emperor had in his Empire mistake me not I speak only as to the Person of the King I do not meddle of Rights between the King and Subjects or Subject and Subject you see in this Case concerning the Death of his Majesty's dear Father and our Blessed Sovereign of happy memory he doth not judg himself but according to Law that which I assert is as to the Person of the King which was the priviledg of Emperors as to their Personal Priviledges if he had offended and committed an Offence he was only accountable to God himself I will come back to what I have said You swore to be faithful to the King as Supreme The King of Poland hath a Crown but at his Oath of Coronation it is conditioned with the People That if he shall not govern according to such and such Rules they shall be freed from their Homage and Allegiance But it differs with our King for he was a King before Oath The King takes his Oath but not upon any condition this I shew you to let you see that we have no coercive Power against the King The King of England was anointed with Oil at his Coronation which was to shew that Absolute Power I do not say of Government but of being accountable to God for what he did The Law saith The King doth no injury to any Man not but that the King may have the imbecilities and infirmities of other Men but the King in his single Person can do no wrong but if the King command a Man to beat me or to disseize me of my Land I have my remedy against the Man though not against the King The Law in all Cases preserves the Person of the King to be untouched but what is done by his Ministers unlawfully there is a remedy against his Ministers for it but in this Case when you come to the Person of the King what do our Law Books say he is they call it Caput Reipublicae salus Populi the Leiutenant of God and let me tell you there was never such a blow given to the Church of England and the Protestant Religion There was a Case and that of the Spencers you shall find in the 7th Report of the Lord Cook in Calvin's Case that Homage is due to the King in his Politick Capacity and then they made this damnable Inference That therefore if the King did not demean himself as he ought that he should be reformed pure aspertee by asperity sharpness or Imprisonment but these were condemned by two Acts of Parliament in Print that they could not do that even
perceive by this Commission that hath been read that we are authorized by the King's Majesty to hear and determine all Treasons Felonies and other Offences within this County But because this Commission is upon a special occasion the Execrable Murther of the blessed King that is now a Saint in Heaven King Charls the first we shall not trouble you with the Heads of a long Charge The ground of this Commission was and is from the Act of Oblivion and Indempnity You shall find in that Act there is an Exception of several persons who for their Execrable Treasons in sentencing to Death and signing the Warrant for the taking away the Life of our said Sovereign are left to be proceeded against as Traytors according to the Laws of England and are out of that Act wholly excepted and fore-prized Gentlemen You see these Persons are to be proceeded with according to the Laws of the Land and I shall speak nothing to you but what are the words of the Laws By the Statute of the twenty fifth of Edward the third a Statute or Declaration of Treason it is made High-Treason to compass and imagine the Death of the King It was the ancient Laws of the Nation In no Case else Imagination or Compassing without an Actual Effect of it was punishable by our Law Nihil officit Conatus nisi sequatur Effectus that was the old Rule of Law But in the case of the King His Life was so pretious that the Intent was Treason by the Common Law and Declared Treason by this Statute The reason of it is this In the case of the Death of the King the Head of the Commonwealth that 's cut off and what a Trunk an inanimate Lump the Body is when the Head is gone you all know For the Life of a single man there 's the Life of the Offendor there 's some Recompence Life for Life But for the Death of the King what Recompence can be made This Compassing and Imagining the cutting off the Head of the King is known by some Overt-Act Treason it is in the wicked Imagination though not Treason Apparent but when this Poison swells out of the Heart and breaks forth into Action in that case it 's High-Treason Then what is an Imagination or Compassing of the King's Death Truly it is any thing which shews what the Imagination is Words in many cases are Evidences of this Imagination they are Evidences of the Heart Secondly As Words so if a man if two men do conspire to Levy War against the King and by the way what I say of the King is as well of the King dead as living for if a Treason be committed in the Life of one King it is a Treason and punishable in the Time of the Successor Then I say in case not only of Words but if they conspire to Levy War against the King there 's another Branch of this Statute the Levying of War is Treason But if men shall go and consult together and this is to kill the King to put Him to Death this Consultation is clearly an Overt-Act to prove this Imagination or Compassing of the King's Death But what will you say then if men do not only go about to conspire and consult but take upon them to Judge Condemn nay put to Death the King Certainly this is so much beyond the Imagination and Compassing as 't is not only laying the Cockatrice's Egg but brooding upon it till it hath brought forth a Serpent I must deliver to you for plain and true Law That no Authority no single person no community of persons not the people Collectively or Representatively have any coercive power over the King of England And I do not speak mine own Sence but the words of the Laws unto you It was the Treason of the Spencers in King Edward the Second's Time in Calvin's case second Report The Spencers had an opinion that all Homage and Allegiance was due to the King by reason of the Crown as they called it And thereupon say the Books and Records they drew out this execrable Inference among others That if the King did not demean himself according to Right because he could not be reformed by Law he might per aspertee that is by sharp Imprisonment but this was adjudged horrid Treason by two Acts of Parliament Gentlemen Let me tell you what our Law-books say for there 's the Ground out of which and the Statutes together we must draw all our Conclusions for matter of Government How do they Stile the King They call Him The Lieutenant of God and many other expressions in the Book of Primo Henrici Septimi Says that Book there The King is immediate from God and hath no Superior The Statutes say That the Crown of England is immediately subject to God and to no other Power The King says our Books He is not only Caput Populi the Head of the People but Caput Reipublicae the Head of the Commonwealth The three Estates And truly thus our Statutes speak very fully Common Experience tells you when we speak of the King and so the Statutes of Edward the Third we call the King Our Sovereign Lord the King Sovereign that is Supreme And when the Lords and Commons in Parliament apply themselves to the King they use this Expression Your Lords and Commons your faithful Subjects humbly beseech I do not speak any Words of my own but the Words of the Laws Look upon the Statute primo Jacobi there 's a Recognition that the Crown of England was lawfully descended on the King and His Progeny The Statute it self was read to which it is desired the Reader will be referred These are the Words of the Act. And this is not the first precedent for you shall find it primo Eli. cap. 3. They do acknowledge the Imperial Crown lawfully descended on the Queen the same Recognition with this Before that because we shall shew you we go upon Grounds of Law in what we say Stat. 24. Hen. 8. cap. 12. Whereas by sundry old authentick Histories and Chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this Realm of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the world governed by one Supreme Head and King having the Dignity and Royal Estate of the Imperial Crown of the same c. 25 Hen. 8. c. 21. there it is the people speaking of themselves That they do recognize no Superiour under God but only the King's Grace Gentlemen You see if the King be immediate under God he derives his Authority from no body else if the King have an Imperial Power if the King be Head of the Commonwealth Head of the body Politick if the body Politick own him obedience truly I think it is an undenied consequence He must needs be Superiour over them Gentlemen This is no new thing to talk of an Emperour or an Imperial Crown Do not mistake me all this while It is one thing to have an Imperial Crown and another
thing to govern absolutely Gentlemen The Imperial Crown is a Word that is significative you shall find in all Statutes primo Eliz. and the first of King James nay even in the Act of Judicial proceedings of this Parliament it is called an Imperial Crown They that take the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy they swear that they will to their power assist and defend all Jurisdictions Priviledges Preheminences and Authorities granted or belonging to the King His Heirs and Successors or annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm What is an Imperial Crown It is that which as to the Coercive part is subject to no man under God The King of Poland has a Crown But what is it At his Coronation it is conditioned with the people That if he shall not Govern them according to such Rules they shall be freed from their Homage and Allegiance But the Crown of England is and always was an Imperial Crown and so sworn Gentlemen As I told you even now the Imperial Crown is a Word significative that Crown which as to the Coercive part is not subject-to any Humane Tribunal or Judicature whatsoever And truly that this is such an Imperial Crown though I have cited Authorities ancient enough you may find them much more ancient I remember in the Story of William Rufus you shall find it in Matthew Paris and Eadmerus some Question was about Investiture of Bishops and the like the King writes His Letter That c. God forbid I should intend any absolute Government by this It is one thing to have an Absolute Monarchy another thing to have that Government Absolutely without Laws as to any coercive power over the Person of the King for as to Things and Actions they will fall under another consideration as I will tell you by and by Gentlemen Since this is so consider the Oath of Supremacy which most men have taken or should take All men that enter into the Parliament-House they are expresly enjoyned by Statute to take the Oath of Supremacy What says that Oath We swear that The King is the only Supreme Governour within this Realm and Dominions He is Supreme and the onely Supreme and truly if he be Supreme there is neither Major nor Superior I urge this the more lest any Person by any Misconstruction or inference which they might make from something that hath been Acted by the Higher Powers they might draw some dangerous Inferences or Consequences to colour or shadow over those Murtherous and Traiterous Acts which afterwards they committed They had no Authority But as I told you though I do set forth this and declare this to you to let you know that the King was immediately subject to God and so was not punishable by any Perfon yet let me tell you there is that excellent Temperament in our Laws that for all this the King cannot rule but by His Laws It preserves the King and his Person and the peoples Rights There are three things touching which the Law is conversant Personae Res Actiones Persons Things and Actions For the Person of the King He is the Supreme Head He is not punishable by any coercive Power the Laws provide for that The King can do no wrong it is a Rule of Law it is in our Law-books very frequent 22d of Edward the Fourth Lord Coke and many others If he can do no Wrong He cannot be punished for any wrong The King He hath the infirmities and weakness of a man but he cannot do any injury at least not considerable in Person He must do it by Ministers Agents Instruments Now the Law though it provide for the King yet if any of his Ministers do wrong though by his command they are punishable The King cannot arrest a man as he cannot be arrested Himself but if He arrest me by another Man I have remedy against this man though not against the King and so He cannot take away my Estate This as to the Person of the King He is not to be touched Touch not mine Anointed I come to Things If the King claim a Right the King must sue according to His Laws the King is subject to the Laws in that case His Possessions shall be tried by Juries If He will try a man for His Fathers Death you see he will try them by the Laws The Law is the Rule and Square of His actions and by which He Himself-is judged Then for Actions that is such Actions whereby Rights and Titles are prosecuted or recovered the King cannot judge in Person betwixt man and man He does it by his Judges and upon Oath and so in all cases whatsoever If the King will have his Right it must be brought before His Judges Though this is an Absolute Monarchy yet this is so far from infringing the Peoples Rights that the People as to their Properties Liberties and Lives have as great a priviledge as the King It is not the sharing of Government that is for the Libertie and Benefit of the People but it is how they may have their Lives and Liberties and Estates safely secured under Government And you know when the Fatness of the Olive was laid aside and we were Governed by Brambles these Brambles they did not only tear the Skin but tore the Flesh to the very Bone Gentlemen I have done in this Particular to let you see that the Supreme Power being in the King the King is immediately under God owing his Power to none but God It is true blessed be God we have as great Liberties as any People have in Christendom in the World but let us own them where they are due We have them by the Concessions of Our Princes Our Princes have granted them and the King now He in them hath granted them likewise Gentlmen I have been a little too long in this and yet I cannot say it is too long because it may clear misunderstanding so many Poisonous Opinions having gone abroad To come a little nearer If we consider suppose there were the Highest Authority but when we shall consider this horrid Murther truly I cannot almost speak of it but Vox faucibus haeret When we shall consider that a few Members of the House of Commons those that had taken the Oath of Supremacy and those that had taken the Oath of Allegiance that was to defend the King and His Heirs against all Conspiracies and Attempts whatsoever against His and their Persons Their Crowns and Dignities not onely against the Pope's Sentence as some would pretend but as otherwise against all Attempts and Conspiracies not onely against His Person Crown and Royal Dignity nor Pope's Sentence nor onely in order to the Profession of Religion but absolutely or otherwise that is whatsoever Attempts by any power Authority or Pretence whatsoever I say when a few Members of the House of Commons not an eighth part of them having taken these Oaths shall assume upon themselves an Authority an Authority what to do shall assume to
with your Countrey that chose you for that Place You know that no Act of Parliament is binding but what is Acted by King Lords and Commons And now as you would make God the Author of your Offence so likewise you would make the People guilty of your Opinion But your Plea is over-ruled To which the Court assented Mr. Harrison I was mistaken a little Whereas it was said the Points were one I do humhly conceive they were not so I say what was done was done in Obedience to the Authority If it were but an Order of the House of Commons thus under a Force yet this Court is not Judge of that Force I say if it was done by one Estate of Parliament it is not to be questioned Court It was not done by one Estate They were but a Part nay but an eighth Part. Denz Hollis It was not an House of Commons They kept up a Company by the power of the Sword Do not abuse the People in saying It was done by the Supreme Power Councel My Lord if it were an House of Commons neither House of Commons nor House of Lords nor House of Lords and Commons together no Authority upon Earth can give Authority for Murthering the King This that he alledgeth is Treason my Lord this that is said is a clear Evidence of that which is charged there is only this more in it he hath done it and if he were to do it again he would do it Lord Chief Baron It is clear as the Noon-day that this was not the House of Commons Suppose it had been an House of Commons and full and suppose which far be it from me to suppose they should have agreed upon such a Murtherous Act for the House of Commons to do such an Act it was void in it self nay any Authority without the House of Lords and King is void You plead to the Jurisdiction of the Court whether we should Judge it or no. Yes I tell you and proper too We shall not speak what Power we have The Judges have Power after Laws are made to go upon the Interpretation of them We are not to judge of those things that the Parliament do But when the Parliament is purged as you call it for the Commons alone to Act for you to say that this is the Authority of Parliament it is that which every man will say Intrenches highly upon his Liberty and Priviledge And what you have said to your Justification what doth it tend to but as much as this I did it justifie it and would do it again which is a new Treason The greatest Right that ever the House of Commons did claim is but over the Commons Do they claim a particular Right over the Lords Nay over the King Make it out if you can but it cannot possibly be made out What you have said doth aggravate your Crimes It is such an approvement of your Treason that all Evidences come short of it King Lords and Commons is the Ground of the english-English-Law Without that no Act of Parliament binds Justice Mallet I have been a Parliament-Man as long as any man here present and I did never know or hear that the House of Commons and Jurisdiction over any saving their own Members which is as much as I will say concerning the Parliament I have heard a Story of a Mute that was born Mute whose Father was slain by a Stranger a man unknown After twenty years or thereabouts this Mute-man fortuned to see the Murtherer of his Father and these were his Words Oh! here is he that slew my Father Sir The King is the Father of the Country Pater Patria so saith Sir Edward Coke He is Caput Reipublicae the Head of the Common-wealth Sir What have you done Here you have cut off the Head of the whole Common-Wealth and taken away Him that was our Father the Governour of the whole Countrey This you shall find Printed and Published in a Book of the greatest Lawyer Sir Edward Coke I shall not need my Lord to say more of this Business I do hold the Prisoner's Plea vain and unreasonable and to be rejected Justice Hide I shall not trouble you with many Words I am sorry that any man should have the Face and Boldness to deliver such words as you have You and all must know That the King is above the Two Houses They must propose their Laws to him The Laws are made by Him and not by Them by their consenting but they are His Laws That which you speak as to the Jurisdiction you are here Indicted for High Treason for you to come to talk of Justification of this by Pretence of Authority your Plea is naught illegal and wicked and ought not to be allowed As to having of Councel the Court understand what you are upon Councel is not to be allowed in that Case and therefore your Plea must be over-ruled Mr. Justice Twisden I shall agree with that which many have already said onely this You have eased the Jury you have confessed the Fact I am of the same Opinion that you can have no Councel therefore I over-rule your Plea if it had been put in never so good Form and Manner Earl of Manchester I beseech you my Lords let us go some other way to work Sir William Wild. That which is before us is Whether it be a matter of Law or Fact For the matter of Law your Lordships have declared what it is his Justification is as high a Treason as the former For matter of Fact he hath confessed it I beseech you My Lord direct the Jury for their Verdict This Gentleman hath forgot their Barbarousness they would not hear their King Court No Councel can be allowed to Justifie a Treason that this is a Treason you are Indicted by an Act of the 25th of Edw. 3d. That which you speak of the House of Commons is but part of the House of Commons they never did nor had any power to make a Law but by King Lords and Commons and therefore your Plea is naught and all the Court here is of the same opinion if they were not they would say so therefore what you have said is over-ruled by the Court. Have you any thing else to offer Mr. Harrison Notwithstanding the Judgment of so many Learned ones that the Kings of England are no ways accountable to the Parliament The Lords and Commons in the beginning of this War having declared the King's beginning War upon them the God of Gods Court Do you render your self so desperate that you care not what Language you let fall It must not be suffered Mr. Harrison I would not willingly speak to offend any man but I know God is no Respecter of Persons His setting up his Standard against the People Court Truly Mr. Harrison this must not be suffered this doth not at all belong to you Mr. Harrison Vnder Favour this doth belong to me I would have abhorred to have brought him to Account
had not the blood of English-men that had been shed Councel Me thinks he should be sent to Bedlam till he comes to the Gallows to render an Account of this This must not be suffered It is in a manner a new Impeachment of this King to justifie their Treasons against His late Majesty Mr. Solicitour General My Lords I pray that the Jury may go together upon the Evidence Sir Edw. Turner My Lords This man hath the Plague all over him it is Pity any should stand near him for he will infect them Let us say to him as they use to write over an House infected The Lord have Mercy upon him and so let the Officer take him away Lord Chief Baron Mr. Harrison We are ready to hear you again but to hear such Stuff it cannot be suffered You have spoken that which is as high a Degree of Blasphemy next to that against God as I have heard You have made very ill use of these Favours that have been allowed you to speak your own Conscience cannot but tell you the Contradiction of your Actions against this that you have heard as the Opinion of the Court. To extenuate your Crimes you may go on but you must not go as before Mr. Harrison I must not speak so as to be pleasing to men but if I must not have liberty as an English-man Court Pray do not reflect thus You have had liberty and more then any Prisoner in your Condition can expect and I wish you had made a good use of it Keep to the Business say what you will Mr. Harrison My Lords thus There was a Discourse by one of the Witnesses that I was at the Committee preparing the Charge and that I should say Let us blacken Him The thing is utterly untrue I abhorred the doing of any thing touching the Blackning of the King There was a little Discourse between the King and my self The King had told me that He had heard that I should come privately to the Isle of Wight to offer some injury to Him But I told Him I abhorred the thoughts of it And whereas it is said that my Carriage was hard to Him when I brought Him to London it was not I that brought Him to London I was commanded by the General to fetch Him from Hurst-Castle I do not remember any hard Carriage towards Him Court Mr. Harrison You have said That you deny that of Blackning which the Witness hath sworn and somewhat else touching the King in His Way to London that the Witness hath sworn to also The Jury must consider of it both of their Oaths and your Contradictions If you have nothing more to say which tends to your Justification We must direct the Jury The end of your Speech is nothing but to infect the People Mr. Harrison You are uncharitable in that Justice Foster My Lords This ought not to come from the Bar to the Bench if you sally out thus about your Conscience If your Conscience should be a darkened Conscience that must not be the Rule of other mens Actions What you speak of that Nature is nothing to the Business If you have any thing to say by way of Excuse for your self for matter of Fact you may speak but if you will go on as before it must not be suffered Mr. Harrison The things that have been done have been done upon the Stage in the sight of the Sun Court All this is a Continuance of the Justification and Confession of the Fact We need no other Evidence Councel He hath confessed his Fact my Lords The matter it self is Treason upon Treason Therefore we pray Direction to the Jury Lord Chief Baron Mr. Harrison I must give Direction to the Jury if you will not go further touching the Fact Mr. Harrison My Lords I say what I did was by the Supreme Authority I have said it before and appeal to your own Consciences that this Court cannot call me to question Lord Chief Baron Mr. Harrison you have appealed to our Consciences We shall do that which by the Blessing of God shall be just for which we shall answer before the Tribunal of God Pray take heed of an Obdurate Hard Heart and a Seared Conscience Mr. Harrison My Lords I have been kept six Moneths a Close Prisoner and could not prepare my self for this Trial by Councel I have got here some Acts of Parliament of that House of Commons which your Lordships will not own and the Proceedings of that House whose Authority I did own Lord Chief Baron This you have said already If you shew never so many of that Nature they will not help you you have heard the Opinion of the Court touching that Authority They all unanimously concur in it Gentlemen of the Jury You see that this Prisoner at the Bar is Indicted for Compassing Imagining and Contriving the Death of our late Sovereign Lord King Charles the First of Blessed Memory In this Indictment there are several things given but as Evidences of it they are but the Overt-Acts of it The one is first that they did meet and consult together about the putting the King to Death and that alone if nothing else had been proved in the Case was enough for you to find the Indictment For the Imagination alone is Treason by the Law But beause the Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King is secret in the Heart and no man knowes it but God Almighty I say That the Imagination is Treason yet it is not such as the Law can lay hold of unless it appear by some Overt-Act Then the first Overt-Act is their Meeting Consulting and Proposing to put the King to Death The second is more open namely their Sitting together and Assuming an Authority to put the King to Death The third is Sentencing the King And I must tell you that any one of these Acts prove the Indictment If you find him guilty but of any one of them either Consulting Proposing Sitting or Sentencing though there is full Proof for all yet notwithstanding you ought to find the Indictment You have heard what the Witnesses have said and the Prisoner's own Confession Witnesses have sworn their sitting together and that he was one One swears he sate four times another twice some several times There are several Witnesses for this as Mr. Masterson Mr. Clark Mr. Kirk and Mr. Nutley And then you have another thing too which truly the Prisoner did not speak of Witness was given against him That he was the Person that Conducted the King this was before that which he would have to be done by a Legislative Power and that is another Overt-Act If a man will go about to Imprison the King the Law knows what is the sad Effect of such Imprisonment That hath often been adjudged to be an Evidence of Imagining and Compassing the Death of the King That man the Prisoner at the Bar it hath been proved to you did Imprison the King and it appears by his own
word is or otherwise They broke the oath of Supremacy which was That the King was the Supreme Governour of these Nations They swore that they would maintain and keep all Priviledges Immunities Preheminencies annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm there is difference between some Crowns and Imperial Crowns An Imperial Crown it was that which was not to be touched in the Person We do not speak any thing of the absoiute Power of the King for you see he cannot Judge concerning the Death of his Father but by Lawes When you swore this Allegiance all those Members of break all this at once This would be so far from having any colour of Authority that he that justifies it justifies it against the light of Conscience and Laws You say you did it by Commandment from them He that doth a Command by such an Authority it is his guilt Our Law-Books say That if a Court at Common-Law exceed their Jurisdiction in that Case he that obeys that Command is punishable In the Court of Common-Pleas if there be an Appeal there for Murther it is only proper to the Upper Bench and therefore if the party be condemned sentenced and executed thereupon the Executioner in that Case is guilty of Murther for obeying that Authority which was indeed no Authority And therefore whereas you would go about to justifie the Fact because you did it by Command of that Authority that is an Aggravation That when men shall assume an Authority which is a Devil at the noon-day appearing without Vizors I say shall assume an Authority never heard of before If men will countenance their Acts by obeying of them it is an Aggravation We have already Declared this in the Case of the Prisoner yesterday We are all satisfied in the Law in that Case It is so clear a Point in Law that my Brethren here and we did over-rule it yesterday in the like Case and so We must now and I hope that all do concur in this Opinion that hath been delivered Lord Finch I hope all do concur in this opinion delivered by my Lord Chief Baron You shelter your self under a Command of the House of Commons But let me tell you and all the Word That if the House of Commons let it have been never so compleat had given a Command it had been a thing no ways justifiable the Justification is an Aggravation Scr. My Lord I do see that every thing I speak though it be for clearing of my self from your ill opinion I see it is taken in an ill sence I humhly beseech pardon for the Expression if I erre I will crave your Lordships pardon But my Lord I say this If I have been misled I am not a single person that have been misled My Lord I could say but I think it doth not become me to say so That I see a great many faces at this time that were misled as well as my self But that I will not insist upon I say this That I hope an Error in Judgment shall not be accounted Malice or an Error of the Will Truly my Lord I never went to the work with a malicious heart I humbly desire your Lordships to take notice of it That I never bore any malice at all against his late Majesty L. C. Bar. Mr. Scroop have you done Scr. My Lord I do beseech your Lordships to take notice That an Error in Judgement is not an Error in the Will L. C. Bar. Mr. Scroop I am very glad to hear you say so But let me tell you what the Law saith The Law in this Case treates the malice If a man do an act of this nature that may be some kind of excuse to God but towards man you are to look to the Fact the Law implies the malice If there be any thing you will say in the Extenuation of your offence we will be very glad to hear that may tend to your help Scr. My Lord There is one Evidence comes in against me that I must confess that I am very sorry to see and my Lord there was a saying it is by my Lord Mayor Elect Truly he is a worthy Gentleman but I desire the Lord may forgive that which he hath spoken Truly my Lord I did never intend any thing in this neither can I directly remember that I spake those words directly as my Lord Mayor Elect doth spake I do believe my Lord Mayor cannot very well remember them himself for he saith So far as he can remember I must confess that when I was there and had appeared according to the Proclamation that such discourse somewhat like it was raised not of my procuring I did not procure the Discourse I never intended the Justification of the Fact but it was my ill success that I should meet with that worthy Gentleman to have so much discourse with him L. C. Bar. Mr. Scroop my Lord Mayor Elect saith no further then this So far as he remembers and the words that you should say were these That some are of one opinion and some are of another Scr. Vpon the death of the King My Lord I mnst confesse to you that somewhat I said to him but I cannot own that I said those words My Lords He is a worthy person I do not desire to spake any thing to degenerate in the least kind from him it is but his yea and my no there was nobody there L. C. Bar. Have you any thing more to say for your self Scr. My Lord if your Lordship do over-rule it so that I may not have Councel I have little more to say L. C. Bar. You have heard the sence of the Court in that particular you cannot have Councel allowed you as to the matter you have pleaded Scr. I have done but only this My Lords I know not whether it be seasonable to mention it I came in upon the Proclamation and My Lord by means of these unhappy words that have been reported of me in the House of Commons whereas before I was no excepted person I came to be excepted and upon the very last day of passing that Act never was excepted before the very last day I beseech you take notice of this L. C. Bar. Mr. Scroop That is a thing that is not before us but there will be a proper time to consider of it in another place that is nothing to the Tryal have you any more to say Sir Scr. No My Lord Will your Lordship please to let me speak a word to the Jury L. Ch. Baron If you speak to the Court the Jury will hear it Scr. Truly my Lord This I do perceive that I am under a very great prejudice as to this fact It hath been the case of many Gentlemen besides my self I desire that these Gentlemen would take my case into consideration as they would their own and I desire that the Lord would give them direction that they may do that which is according to Justice and Mercy that is all I
out of a few persons that makes a Parliament We see as before so still it is your course to blow the Trumpet of Sedition Did you ever hear or can you produce instances of an Act of Parliament made by the House of Commons alone though this was not the House of Commons as you heard before Ca. Neither was there ever such a War or such a precedent Court Nor we hope never will be Pray remember you were returned to serve in the House what was that Writ that summon'd your appearance You had no manner of ground in the world to go that way that you did Coun. We pray that the Prisoner at the Bar give us pationce a little to repeat that to him which your Lordships have been so often troubled with declaring this is not the first or second time that in this publique Assembly it hath been said That neither the Lords nor the Commons jointly nor severally have any power at all to proceed upon the Person of the King That it is not in their power to condemn any man in England without the good pleasure of the King much less the King himself and that this is the great Liberty of the people of England that it should be so and it was the first breach and invasion of our Liberty that that first Parliament made and which you justifie in the name of the Lord. In this case to throw us upon Debates of the War and to talk here of the causes and reasons of that quarrel which ended in such a Tragedie For this person to come here with this confidence and to justifie it but that he knows he cannot be in a worse condition one would wonder it should fall from any man that hath any regard of himself it is all one to them that perish whether they fall by one sin or multitudes He makes no scruple to multiply Treasons I do beseech your Lordship he may not offer as he hath begun but that the Jury may proceed Court All the Court are of the same opinion not to hear any thing like the former Discourses Ca. I desire I may be heard I have not compassed the Death of the late King contrived the death of the King what I did I did by Authority Court This is not to be heard You have heard what hath bin said to you There could be no such Authority neither was nor could be but you would by a wyre-lace bring it in by this You have confessed the Fact which must be left to the Jury L. Ansley I think you were present in the House of Commons when that Vote passed for agreement with the King in the Treaty at the Isle of Wight You know the King having condescended to most of the desires of This Parliament there was a debate in the House and a conclusion that they were grounds for peace You know the Lords and Commons did resolve to agree with their King when that was done that would not satisfie you and other Members of the House Then you go and contrive new ways you contrive a new fashioned Parliament the driving away many Members by power which you could not do by the Law of the Land Nay the Parliament had Declared against that which you pretend is by Authority is no Authority for a few of you set up an Arbitrary Parliament of a few of your selves when you had driven away the rest This kind of Parliament gives you the Authority you pretend to You were saying that the Parliament was called at first the Lords and Commons by the King according to the ancient Constitutions of the Laws Did such a Parliament give you such Authority as you pretend to and Act of Parliament as you call it which was but an Order of some of the Commons and but a few of them you can have no manner of Justification and therefore your Plea must be over-ruled as yesterday it was in the like Case You are indicted upon a cleer Act of Parliament of 25. Edw. 3. and you defend your self upon pretence of an Act of Parliament which hath been over-ruled as no Act. Ca. I am a stranger to many of these things which you have offered and this is strange You give evidence sitting as a Judge L. Ch. Bar. You are mistaken it is not Evidence he shews you what Authority that was an Authority of 26 Members How is this Evidence Mr. Carew if you have any thing more of Fact go on If you have nothing but according to this kind of discourse I am commanded to direct the Jury Ca. I am very willing to leave it with the Lord if you will stop me that I cannot open the true nature of those things that did give me ground of satisfaction in my Conscience that I did it from the Lord. Mr. Sol. I do pray for the honour of God and our King That he may not be suffered to go on in this manner You have been suffered to speak you have said but little only Sedition You pretend a Conscience and the fear of the Lord when all the world knows you did it against the Law of the Lord your own Conscience the light of Nature and the Laws of the Land against the Oaths you have taken of Allegiance and Supremacy Ca. Gentlemen of the Jury I say I shall leave it with you This Authority I speak of is right which was the supreme Power it is well known what they were Coun. It is so indeed many have known what they were L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Carew You have been heard what and beyond what was fit to say in your own defence that which you have said the heads of it you see the whole Court hath over-ruled To suffer you to expatiate against God and the King by Blasphemy is not to be endured it is suffering poison to go about to infect people but they know now too well the old saying In Nomine Domini In the Name of the Lord all mischiefs have been done that hath been an old Rule I must now give directions to the Jury L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury Ca. I have desired to speak the words of truth and soberness but have been hindered L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury You see the Prisoner here at the Bar hath been Indicted of Treason and this was for Compassing and Imagining the Death of our Soveraign Lord K. Charles the First of blessed Memory The Indictment sets forth several overt-Acts to prove this Imagination for otherwise it is secret in the heart the Fact it self the Treason it self is the Imagination of the heart The overt-Acts that are laid down in the Indictment to prove this That they did consult and meet together how to put the King to death That they did sit upon him And thirdly That they did sentence him to death and afterwards he died You heard what is proved against the Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar by several Witnesses His own Confession That he signed the Warrant for Summoning and
actually guilty of putting the King to death nay admitting in charity you had no intent to go as far as you did you are by the laws of Christ and this Nation guilty of high Treason in that you that are a Lawyer know very well and I speak it that you may lay it to your heart in the convictions of your conscience I must say to you as Joshua said to Achan my son give glory to God and confess and it would become you so to do you know very well it is the law of this Nation that no one house nor both houses of Parliament have any coercive power over the King much less to put him to death you know as you cited very well that the imprisoning of the King is Treason You know both of you this is an undoubted truth the rule of Law is that the King can do no wrong that is the King can do no wrong in the estimation of Law he may do some particular Acts as a private person but he can do little prejudice in his own person if he would hurt any it must be by Ministers in that case the Law provides a remedy if he doth it by Ministers they must answer for it The King of England is one of those Princes who hath an Imperial Crown what is that It is not to do what he will no but it is that he shall not be punished in his own person if he doth that which in it self is unlawful Now remember this when you took the oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy I presume you both did so what was your oath of Supremacy It was this that the King was the only Supream Governour of these Realms it goes farther as he was Supream Governour so he was the only Supream Governour that excludes Coordination you swear farther that you will to the utmost of your power defend the King against all conspiracies and attempts whatsoever truly you that were a Lawyer when you had thus sworn your fee could be no excuse against what you had sworn to We know that the King in his politick or natural capacity is not only salus populi but salus Reipublicae The Law hath taken care that the people shall have justice and right the Kings person ought not to be touched the King himself is pleased to judge by the Law you see he doth by Law question the death of his Father he doth not judge it himself but the Law judges it Mr. Peters knows very well he subscribed the 39. Articles of Religion look upon them that were made in 1552. and upon those Articles that were confirmed in 13. Elizabeth the King is there acknowledged to have the chief power in these Nations the medling with the King was a Jesutical doctrine This I speak not that the King should or ought to govern but by the Fundamental laws of the land they that keep within the bounds of the law are happy you that are a Lawyer know this in point of law and you that are a Divine know this in point of Divinity You both know the truth of it and when you have thought upon it I hope you will reflect upon that horrid crime the shedding of Royal Blood You see he had granted all those grievances of the people taken them away secured them for the future and at this very time when this horrid act was done you see he had granted all at the desire of the people he had made those concessions such as were it not in respect of others more than those that treated themselves they thought was more than could be expected by the Nation You that had a hand in the Kings death it falls upon you the guilt of it because you were some of those instruments that assisted those persons that broke the Treaty prepare your selves for that death which you are to die it is a debt which we all owe to nature if in this case there is something of shame comes to you it is that you must take as part of the reward of your sin The only work I have now to do is to pronouce the Judgment and this is the judgment of the Court and the Court doth award That both of you be led back to the place from whence you came and from thence shall be drawn upon a hurdle c. and the Lord have mercy upon your souls Cl. Cryer make proclamation Cryer O yes c. All manner of persons c. and all Jurors and witnesses are to appear at this place to morrow morning at seven of the Clock in the morning upon pain of 100. l. a piece So God bless King Charles c. 15. Octo. 1660. at the Sessions House in the Old Bailey The Tryal of William Howlet Memorandum that the Bill of Indictment against William Hewlet alias Howlet was found at Hickes-hall 12 Octob. instant Proclamation of the Court being made Clerk of the Crown SET William Hewlet alias Howlet to the Bar which was done accordingly Cl. William Hewlet alias Howlet hold up thy hand Thou standest Indicted of High Treason in the County of Middlesex by the name of William Hewlet alias Howlet for that thou c. How sayest thou art thou guilty of the High Treason whereof thou hast been Indicted and art now arraigned or not guilty Hewlet I am not guilty my Lord. Clerk How wilt thou be tryed Hewlet By God and the Country Cl. God send thee a good delivery Set him aside Octob. 15. 1660. Clerk of the Crown Set Axtell to the Bar which was done accordingly Clerk Daniel Axtell hold up thy Hand Axtell Pray my Lord let me have Pen and Ink. L. Ch. Bar. Give Mr. Axtell Pen and Ink. Cler. Daniel Axtell these men that were last called of the Jury are to pass c. if you will challenge them or any of them you must challenge them when they come to the Book before they are sworn L. Ch. Bar. Do you know how many you have liberty to challenge because I would not have you misinformed 35 you may challenge peremptorily and no more Axtell I thank you Lordship L. Ch. Bar. Unless you have any particular cause if so you may challenge more Axtell I confess I am wholly ignorant of the law John Kirke John Smith Thomas Morris Ralph Halsell John Sherecroft Francis Beale Robert Cromwell John Gallyerd John Shelbury George Rithe were called and by the Prisoner challenged Thomas Bide Charles Pitfield Robert Sheppard William Dod Thomas Vsman William Maynerd George Plucknet Samuel Harris John Nicoll of Hendon Henry Marsh Thomas Bishop Thomas Snow in all 12 were admitted and sworn of the Jury Cler. of the Crown If any man can inform my Lords the Kings Justices c. Cl. Daniel Axtell hold up thy hand Look upon the prisoner you that are sworn and harken to your charge you shall understand that the prisoner stands Indicted c. K. Council May it please your Lordships and you Gentlemen that are Sworn of this Jury The High Court
there may be a favourable construction made of it I humbly leave it with you I did my Duty to pray for the King but had no malice to act willingly against him Clerk Henry Marten Counsel He did both sign and seal the Precept for summoning the Court and the Warrant for Execution sat almost every day and particularly the day of Sentence Marten My Lord I do not decline a confession so as to the matter of Fact the malice set aside maliciously murderously and traiterously Counsel If you have any thing to say to that we will prove it L. Ch. Baron That I may inform you in it there is malice implied by Law malice in the Act it self that which you call malice that you had no particular intention or design against the King's Person but in relation to the Government that will not be to this present business if it should extenuate any thing that would be between God and your own Soul but as to that which is alledged in the Indictment Maliciously Murderously and Traiterously they are the consequences of Law If a Man meet another in the Street and run him through in this case the Law implies malice though but to an ordinary Watchman there is malice by the Law in the Fact if there was no such expressed personal malice as you conceive yet the Fact done implies malice in Law Mr. Solicitor General My Lord He does think a Man may sit upon the death of the King sentence him to death sign a Warrant for his Execution meekly innocently charitably and honestly Marten I shall not presume to compare my knowledg in the Law with that of that Learned Gentleman but according to that poor understanding of the Law of England that I was capable of there is no Fact that he can name that is a Crime in it self but as it is circumstantiated Of killing a Watchman as your Lordship instanced a Watchman may be killed in not doing his Office and yet no murder Lord Chief Baron I instanced that of a Watchman to shew there may be a malice by Law though not expressed though a Man kill a Watchman intending to kill another Man in that case it is malice in Law against him so in this case if you went to kill the King when he was not doing his Office because he was in Prison and you hindred him from it the Law implies malice in this It is true all Actions are circumstantiated but the killing of the King is Treason of all Treasons Justice Foster If a Watchman be killed it is murder it is in contempt of Magistracy of the Powers Above the Law says that contempt adds to the malice Counsel We shall prove against the Prisoner at the Bar because he would wipe off malice he did this very merrily and was in great sport at the time of the signing the Warrant for the King's Execution Marten That does not imply malice Ewer sworn Councel Come Sir you are here upon your Oath speak to my Lords and the Jury you know the Prisoner at the Bar very well you have sometimes served him Were you present in the Painted Chamber January 29. 1648. at the signing the Warrant the Parchment against the King Ewer The day I do not remember but I was in that Chamber to attend a Gentleman there I followed that Gentleman looking at Mr. Marten I followed that Gentleman into that Chamber L. C. Baron After what Gentleman Ewer Mr. Marten my Lord I was pressing to come near but I was put off by an Officer or Souldier there who told me I should not be there I told him I was ordered to be by that Gentleman My Lord I did see a Pen in Mr. Cromwel's hand and he marked Mr. Marten in the face with it and Mr. Marten did the like to him but I did not see any one set his Hand though I did see a Parchment there with a great many Seals to it Sir Purback Temple sworn Counsel What do you know of that Gentleman in his carriage of this Business Sir Purback Temple My Lords I being present in Town when that horrid Murder was contrived against the late King there came some Persons of Honour Servants to the late King to my Father's House Sir Edward Partridge to engage me to join with them to attempt the King's escape In order whereunto they told me nothing would tend so much to his Majesty's Service as to endeavour to discover some part of their Counsels for that it was resolved by Cromwel to have the King tried at the High Court of Justice as they called it the next day and desired me if possible to be there to discover their Counsels whereby the King might have notice and those that were to attempt his escape In order whereunto the next day by giving Mony to the Officer of the Painted Chamber I got in by day light in the Lobby to the Lords House I espied a Hole in the Wall under the Hangings where I placed my self till the Council came where they were contriving the manner of trying the King when he should come before them and after the manner of praying and private consults amongst themselves when their Prayer was over there came news that the King was landed at Sir Robert Cotton's Stairs at which Cromwel run to a Window looking on the King as he came up the Garden he returned as white as the Wall returning to the Board he speaks to Bradshaw and Sir Henry Mildmay how they and Sir William Breerton had concluded on such a Business Then turning to the Board said thus My Masters He is come He is come and now we are doing that great Work that the whole Nation will be full of Therefore I desire you to let us resolve here what answer we shall give the King when he comes before us for the first Question that he will ask us will be By what Authority and Commission do we try him To which none answered presently Then after a little space Henry Marten the Prisoner at the Bar rose up and said In the Name of the Commons and Parliament assembled and all the good People of England which none contradicted so all rose up and then I saw every Officer that waited in the Room sent out by Cromwel to call away my Lord such a one whose Name I have forgot who was in the Court of Wards Chamber that he should send away the Instrument which came not and so they adjourned themselves to Westminster-Hall going into the Court of Wards themselves as they went thither When they came to the Court in Westminster-Hall I heard the King ask them the very same Question that Cromwel had said to them Mr. Solicitor Gentlemen the Prisoner at the Bar confesses his Hand to the Warrant for Executing the King you see by his Servant how merry he was at the sport You see by his Witness how serious he was at it and gave the foundation of that Advice upon which they all proceeded and now he
the name of Daniel Axtel of Westminster in the County of Middlesex Gentleman I think none knew me to live there and inhabit there Lord Chief Baron I would not interrupt you this is past you should have made your exception to that as Master Matten did before concerning his name that should have been first done you have appeared and pleaded to that name and it was late of Westminster Axtell My Lord I have this to speak in arrest of Judgment that the Indictment being grounded upon that statute of the twenty fifth of Edward the third it is either mistaken or not pursued my Lords I did yesterday give you the Judgment of the Lords and Commons concerning the statute in relation to my case I say the Statute was mistaken or not pursued Lord chief Baron That was offered before Sir as to the matter of it Axtell My Lord I think not I am mistaken if it were Lord Chief Baron Then open it Axtell My Lord I do not find in that statute that words are an overt act words only L. Ch. B. This was over-ruled The things that you objected were these That there is not any overt act that is laid that could be applicable to your case if it were not particularly applicable you are found guilty by the Jury it would be nothing But there is an overt act you were present at the Court beating the Souldiers sending for an Executioner but for words if one man should say here is the King go and kill him this is Treason but you were guilty in all according to Law You being there and doing this you were not guilty onely of the words but of all that was done there is none but Principals in Treason What we say and do to you we well know we must answer before God Almighty for it Axtell I have but one word more truly I do appeal to God before whom I shall have another tryall I do not find my self guilty either of consulting contriving or having a hand in the death of the King I am innocent and I pray God that my innocent blood Lord Chief Baron Pray Sir Axtell May not cry Lord Chief Baron You are now to speak in arrest of Judgment Axtell I have no more I pray your Lordships favour and mercy to me William Hulet alias Howlet hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Hulet Truly my Lord I have little further to say If you had been pleased to give me further time I should have cleared my self I call God above to witness upon this account that I am as clear as any man I submit to the mercy of the Court. L. Ch. B. For that I do but cannot positively say it that at your request notwithstanding the Judgment will pass against you there may be some time till his Majesties pleasure be known before any execution will be upon that Judgment against you in the mean time we must proceed according to Law and Justice Proclamation for silence whilst Judgment is giving The Lord Chief Barons speech before the Sentence pronounced against the aforenamed Prisoners found guilty YOu that are Prisoners at the Bar you stand here in several Capacities yet all of you persons convicted of the detestable and execrable murder of our Soveraign Lord King Charles the first of blessed memory Mistake me not I do not say that you are all of you guilty of executing the fact but in Law and in conscience pro tanto though not pro toto you are guilty of it in that you prepared the way and means to it in that you brought his head to the block though you did not cut it off You are here in three sorts and I must apply my words accordingly and truely I do it with as much sorrow of heart as you have many of you being persons of liberal education great parts I say you are of three sorts There are some of you that though the Judgment of death is to pass against you by his Majesties grace and favour and the mercy under him of the two houses of Parliament Execution is to be suspended untill another Act of Parliament shall pass to that purpose that is all of you but three for those three the one of them that was last called William Heveningham he is in another capacity too for I presume some time will be given to him to consider of something relating to him before any order will be given for his execution there are two others of you and that is Dan. Axtel and Francis Hacker and for you as it yet stands before us there is no mercy there is no room for it but though you be in these several Classes yet what I shall say will concern you all because I do not know how it may fall with you none of us know how soon we may come to our deaths some probably sooner then others all must come to it you are now before the Tribunal of man but that is for Judgment for your offence here but there is another Judgment hereafter and a Tribunal before which both you and we must stand every man here and we must receive according to our work those that have done ignorantly by a serious and unfeigned repentance God Almighty may shew mercy unto them He hath reserved mercy even for the greatest offenders Saint Paul himself when he presecuted Christ ignorantly upon his repentance he found mercy those of you that are not yet convicted in your consciences of the foulness of this horrid fact look into your Consciences a little more and see if it be not a great Judgment for your former offence that you should be given over to a reprobate sense let me tell you a seared Conscience a bold confidence not upon good grounds is so far from securing the Conscience it may stifle perhaps the mouth of Conscience but it will rise up more in Judgment against you Here you have made your defence and I do not blame you for it life is precious but remember the thoughts of your hearts are open whether you did it ignorantly covetously or to get the Government into your own hands that I am not able to search into God and you only know that give me leave to say something perhaps I have repeated it by parts before God is my witness what I speak I speak from mine own Conscience and that is this Gentlemen because I saw it stuck with some of you that is that whatsoever the case was that by the Laws of these Nations the fundamental Laws there could not be any coercive power over your King I speak it again because I would as near as I could speak the whole truth and would not mislead any man in such a case remember that no power no person no Community or body of men not the people either collectively or representatively have any coercive power over the person of the King by the fundamental Laws for that
Imprimatur J. BERKENHEAD 1660. AN EXACT and most IMPARTIAL ACCOMPT OF The Indictment Arraignment Trial and Judgment according to Law of Twenty Nine REGICIDES THE Murtherers Of His Late SACRED MAJESTY Of Most Glorious Memory Begun at Hicks-Hall on Tuesday the 9th of October 1660. And Continued at the Sessions-House in the Old-Bayley until Friday the nineteenth of the same Moneth Together with a SUMMARY of the Dark and Horrid Decrees of those Caballists Preparatory to that Hellish Fact Exposed to view for the Reader 's Satisfaction 〈◊〉 Information of Posterity London Printed for R. Scot T. Basset R. Chisâ—ell and J. Wright 1679. A SUMMARY by way of Premise of the dark Proceedings of the Cabal at WESTMINSTER Preparatory to the Murther of His late Sacred Majesty Taken out of their own Journal-Book THe Commons Resolved That no further Addresses be made to the King by themselves nor by any other without leave of both Houses And those that do to incur the Penalty of High-Treason And Declare They will receive no more Messages from Him And Enjoyn That no Person whatsoever receive or bring any Message from Him to Both or either Houses or to any other Person 15. Jan. 1647. The Lords concurred to these Votes 17. August 1648. The Commons concur with the Lords That these Votes for Non-Addresses be Revoked 20. November 1648 The Army present their Remonstrance to the Parliament for bringing Delinquents to Justice 24. November 1648. The Treaty at the Isle of Wight Voted to continue till the twenty seventh of November 1. December 1648. Master Hollis presents an Account of the Treaty with the King And the same day information was brought them of the King 's being removed from Carisbrook to Hurst Castle 5. December 1648. The King's Answer to the Propositions Voted a Ground for the House to proceed upon for Settlement of the Peace of the Kingdom 6. December 1648. The Members were secured by Colonel Pride 7. December 1648. The House of Commons appointed a day of Humiliation Peters Caryl and Marshal to perform the Duty The several Votes For Revoking the Votes for Non Addresses to the King For a Treaty to be had with Him That His Answers to the Propositions were a Ground for Peace Voted Dishonourable and Destructive 23. December 1648. A Committee was appointed to consider how to proceed in a way of Justice against the King and other Capital Offenders 28. December 1648. An Ordinance for Trial of the King was read 1. January 1648. Declared and adjudged by the Commons That by the Fundamental Laws It is Treason in the King of England for the time being to levy War against the Parliament and Kingdom 2. Jan. 1648. The Lords disagreed to this Vote and cast it out and the Ordinance for Tryal of the King Nemine contradicente 3. Jan. 1648. The same Vote was again put to the question in the House of Commons and carried in the Affirmative 4. Jan. 1648. Master Garland presents a new Ordinance for erecting an High Court of Justice for Tryal of the King which was read the first second and third time assented to and passed the same day And Ordered no Copy to be delivered Same day Resolved That the People are under God the Original of all just Powers That themselves being Chosen by and Representing the People have the Supreme Power in the Nation That whatsoever is Enacted or Declared for Law by the Commons in Parliament hath the force of a Law and the People concluded thereby though Consent of King and Peers be not had thereunto 6 Jan. 1648. The Commissioners for Tryal of the King are Ordered to meet on Monday then next at two of the Clock in the Painted-Chamber Their days of sitting were 8 10 12 13 15 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 of January 1648. Painted-Chamber Monday 8 January They chose Ask Dorislaus Steel and Cook to be their Councel and other Officers And sent out their Precept under their Hands and Seals for Proclaiming their Court in Westminster-hall to be held in the Painted-Chamber on the tenth Which Precept is all of Ireton's Hand-writing Journal of the Court fol. 6. And Tuesday the 19th The Commissioners Ordered That the Proclamation be made in Cheap-side and at the Old-Exchange And appointed a Committee to consider of the matter of Government of making a new Great Seal and not using the name of a Single Person Wednesday the tenth They chose Bradshaw who was absent for their President and Say pro tempore who gave Garland thanks for his Pains about the business of the Court Fol. 72. And appointed their Councel to prepare and prosecute their Charge And a Committee to consider for carrying on the Tryal Whereof Millington Garland and Martin were three Friday the twelve Waller and Harrison are desired to attend the General to appoint Guards to attend the Court. And Titchbourn and Roe with others to prepare for the Solemnity of the Tryal and to appoint Workmen c. Fol. 16. The Charge to be brought in on Monday And Waller Scot Titchbourn Harrison and others to consider of the place for Tryal and Report the next day Saturday the thirteenth Upon Garland's Report Ordered The Tryal be where the Courts of King's Bench and Chancery sate in Westminster-Hall fol. 20. Monday the Fifteenth The Councel brought in a Draught of the Charge And a Committee appointed to advise therein and compare the Evidence therewith fol. 21. And they and others to consider the manner of bringing the King to his Tryal And that day Titchbourn delivered a Petition to the Commons in the name of the Commons in London in Common-Council differing from the Lord Major and Aldermen The Substance was for bringing the King to Justice Which was Ordered to be Registred in the Books of Common-Councel Wednesday the 17th The Charge recommitted to the Committee Fol. 24. Thursday the 18th Tichbourn excused the absence of Mr. Steel and nothing then else done Fol. 29. Friday the 19th Upon Millington's Report of the Charge and Form of words for exhibiting it Ordered That the Attorney or in his absence the Solicitor exhibit it Fol. 30. And Waller Harrison and others to appoint thirty to wait upon the King and twenty upon the President Saturday the 20th Forenoon Ordered That Mildmay deliver the Sword of State to Humphreys to bear before the President The Solicitor presents the Charge engrossed which being read and signed by him was returned to him to be exhibited And then Adjourned to Westminster-Hall Westminster-Hall Saturday the 20th Afternoon The King was brought in by Thomlinson attended by Hacke and two and thirty Partisans And Cook then exhibited the Charge And the King not owning their Authority was remanded And they Adjourned till Monday Painted-Chamber Monday the 22d Forenoon They approved of what their President had done on Saturday and Resolved That the King should not be suffered to question their Jurisdiction Fol. 50. Westminster-Hall Same day Afternoon Cook prayed That the King
themselves an Authority to make Laws which was never heard before Authority to make Laws What Laws a Law for an High Court of Justice a Law for lives to sentence mens lives And whose Life the Life of their Sovereign upon such a King who as to them had not only redressed long before at the beginning of the Parliament all Grievances that were and were imaginable taken away the Star-Chnmber High-Commission-Court and about Shipping such a King and after such Concessions that He had made in the Isle of Wight when He had granted so much that was more than the People would have desired When these few Commons not onely without but excluding the rest of the Commons not onely without but excluding the rest but rejecting the Lords too that then sat when these few Commons shall take upon them this Authority and by colour of this their King Soveraign Liege Lord shall be sentenced put to Death and that put to Death even as their King and sentenced as their King put to Death as their King and this before His own Door even before that Place where He used in Royal Majesty to hear Embassadors to have His Honourable Entertainments that this King shall be thus put to Death at Noon-day it is such an Aggravation of Villany that truly I cannot tell what to say No story that ever was I do not think any Romance any Fabulous Tragedy can produce the like Gentlemen If any Person shall now come and shroud himself under this pretended Authority or such a pretended Authority you must know that this is so far from an Excuse that it is an Height of Aggravation The Court of Common-Pleas is the Common Shop for Justice in that Court an appeal is brought for Murther which ought to have been in the King's Bench the Court gives Judgment the Party is condemned and executed in this Case it is Murther in them that executed because they had no lawful Authority I speak this to you to shew you that no man can shroud himself by colour of any such false or pretended Authority I have but one thing more to add to you upon this head and that is which I should have said at first If two or more do compass or Imagine the King's Death if some of them go on so far as to Consullation if others of them go further they sentence and execute put to Death in this Case they are all Guilty the first Consultation was Treason I have no more to add but one Particular a few Words As you will have Bills presented against those for Compassing Imagining Adjudging the King so possibly you may have Bils presented against some of those for Levying War against the King Levying of War which is another Branch of the State of 25th of Edward the Third It was but Declarative of the Common Law it was no new Law By that Law it was treason to Levy War against the King But to levy War against the Kings Authority you must know is Treason too If men will take up Armes upon any Publick pretence if it be to expulse Aliens if but to pull out Privy Councellours if it be but against any Particular Laws to reform Religion to pull down Enclosures in all these cases If Persons have assembled themselves in a Warlike manner to do any of these Acts this is Treason and within that Branch of Levying War against the King This was adjudged in the late Kings Time in Berstead's case Queen Elizabeth's Henry the Eighth's former Times King Jame's Time much more 〈◊〉 men will go not onely to Levy War against the King but against the Laws all the Laws subvert all the Laws to set up new Laws Models of their own If any of these cases come to be presented to you you know what the Laws are To conclude you are now to enquire of Blood of Royal Blood of Sacred Blood Blood like that of the Saints under the Altar crying Quousque Domine How long Lord c. This Blood crys for Vengeance and it will not be appeased without a Bloody Sacrifice Remember but this and I have done I shall not press you upon your Oaths you are Persons of Honour you all know the Obligation of an Oath This I will say that he that conceals or favours the guilt of Blood takes it upon himself wilfully knowingly takes it upon himself And we know that when the Jews said Let his blood be on us and our seed it continued to them and their Posterity to this day God save the King Amen Amen His Lordships Speech being ended Thomas Lee of the Middle-Temple London Gentleman was called to give in the Names of his Witnesses The names of the Witnesses then and there sworn follow William Clark Esq James Nutley Esq Mr. George Masterson Clerk George Farringdon Hercules Huncks Dr. William King Martin Foster John Baker Stephen Kirk Richard Nunnelly John Powel John Throckmorton John Blackwel Ralph Hardwick Thomas Walkley Gentleman Holland Simpson Benjamin Francis Colonel Matthew Thomlinson Griffith Bodurdo Esq Samuel Boardman Robert Carr Esq Richard Young Sir Purbock Temple John Rushworth Esq John Gerrard John Hearn Mr. Coitmore Mr. Cunningham Mr. Clench Willinm Jessop Esq Edward Austin Darnel Esq Mr. Brown Thomas Tongue John Bowler Mr. Sharp Mr. Lee. Robert Ewer John King Edward Folley Mr. Gouge Anthony Mildmay Esq The Grand Jury returned the Indictment Billa Vera. Court adjourned to the Old-Bailey 10th of October The 10. of October 1660. SIR John Robinson Knight Lieutenant of his Majesties Tower of London according to his Warrant received delivered to Mr. Sheriff the Prisoners hereafter named who were in several Coaches with a strong Guard of Horse and Foot conveyed to Newgate and about nine of the Clock in the Morning delivered to the Keepers of that Prison and thence brought to the Sessions-house in the Old-Baily London where the Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer were in Court assembled and where their Indictment was publickly read by Edward Shelton Esq Clerk of the Crown Sessions-House in the Old-Baily 10. October 1660. THE Court being Assembled and Silence commanded the Commission of Oyer and Terminer was again read After which Sir Hardress Waller Collonel Thomas Harrison and Mr. William Heveningham were brought to the Bar and commanded to hold up their Hands which Sir Hardress Waller and Mr. Heveningham did but Harrison being commanded to hold up his Hand answered I am here and said My Lord if you please I will speak a Word Court Hold up your hand and you shall be heard in duetime Mr. Harrison the course is That you must hold up your hand first And then he held up his hand The Indictment was read purporting That He together with others not having the fear of God before his Eyes and being instigated by the Devil did Maliciously Treasonably and Feloniously contrary to his due Allegiance and bounden Duty sit upon and condemn our late Soveraign Lord King Charles the First of ever Blessed Memory and also did upon
Clerk George Fleetwood Hold up thy hand What saiest thou Art thou guilty of this horrid Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and art now Arraigned or Not guilty George Fleetwood My Lord I came in upon his Majestie 's Proclamation Clerk Art thou Guilty or Not guilty George Fleetwood I must Confess I am Guilty And thereupon he delivered a Petition in to the Court which he said was directed To his Majesty and the Parliament and the Court did receive it accordingly Clerk Set him aside Clerk Simon Meyn Hold up thy hand What saiest thou Art thou guilty of this horrid Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and art now Arraigned or Not guilty Sim. Meyn Not guilty I come in upon His Majestie 's Proclamation my Lord. Clerk How wilt thou be Tried Sim. Meyn By God and the Countrey Clerk God send thee a good Deliverance Clerk James Temple Hold up thy hand What saiest thou Art thou guilty of this horrid Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and art now Arraigned or Not guilty James Temple Not guilty Clerk How wilt thou be Tried James Temple By God and the Countrey Clerk God send thee a good Deliverance Clerk Peter Temple Hold up your hand How saiest thou Art thou guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and for which thou art now Arraigned or Not guilty Peter Temple Not guilty Clerk How wilt thou be Tried Peter Temple By God and the Countrey Clerk God send thee a good Deliverance Clerk Thomas Wait Hold up your Hand How saiest thou Art thou guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and for which thou art Arraigned or Not Guilty Th Wait. I desire to be heard a word or two Court There is a Rule of Law which is set to us and you that in all these Cases you are to plead Guilty or Not guilty When you have Pleaded if Not Guilty you may speak what you will in its proper time Clerk Are you Guilty or Not guilty Th. Wait. I pray let me be heard a word I am very unwilling to spend time knowing you have a great deal of Business I am very unwilling to deprive my self of my Native Right I shall speak nothing but that which is Truth Court Do not Preface then but speak what you would say Th. Wait. My Lord my Case is different from the rest Court Whatsoever the Case he you have no Plea to us but guilty or Not guilty We can go no other way The Law sets our your Plea Th. Wait. My Lord I would speak one word There was a Great Peer of this Nation Indicted at Northampton within these two years for killing a man The Judges there Court You must Plead guilty or Not guiley Pray who are you that should take this upon you more then all the rest You must go the ordinary way guilty or Not guilty Are you guilty or Not guilty We do not intend to prevent any thing you have to say but it must be proper Clerk Are you guilty or Not guilty Th. Wait. I cannot say I am Guilty Court How then Th. Wait. I am Not guilty Clerk How wilt thou be Tried Th. Wait. By God and the Countrey Clerk Good send thee a good Deliverance Clerk Hugh Peters Hold up thy hand How saiest thou Art thou guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and for which thou art now Arraigned or Not guilty Hugh Peters I would not for ten thousand Worlds say I am Guilty I am Not guilty Clerk How will you be Tried Hugh Peters By the Word of God Here the People laughed Court You must say By God and the Countrey Tell him you that stand by him what he should say if he doth not know Clerk How will you be Tried Hugh Peters By God and the Countrey Clerk God send thee a good Deliverance Clerk Dan. Axtel Hold up thy hand What saiest thou Art thou guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and for which thou art now Arraigned or Not guilty Dan. Axtel May it please your Lordship I desire to have the freedom of an English-man that which is my Right by Law and inheritance I have something to offer in point of Law Clerk Art thou Guilty or Not guilty Dan. Axtel My Lords give me leave to speak For the Matter of the Indictment I conceive is upon the King's Death that there is a Commission of Oyer and Terminer for you to sit But in regard it was in pursuance of an Act of Parliament I conceive no Inferiour Court ought to judge of it I desire Councel it being of great and eminent Concernment in Law That ever any Judges or any Inferiour Court should judge of the Powers and Priviledges of a Parliament and I pray that Councel may be assigned me Clerk Are you Guilty or Not guilty Dan. Axtel If the Court over-rule me and I shall not have my Liberty as an English-man Court The Course of Law is this No man can Justifie Treason If the matter which you have to say be Justifiable it is not Treason if Treason it is not Justifiable Therefore you must go to the ordinary course of the Law You must Plead Guilty or Not guilty Dan. Axtel I can produce many Precedents Cour Are you Guilty or Not guilty The Language is put into your Mouth You have no other words to express your self by at this time but Guilty or Not guilty Dan Axtel Judg Heath had Councel assigned him upon the same Case Court That is very strange the same case What was it for killing a King Dan. Axtel If the Court will over-rule me I cannot help it Mr. Solicitour Gen. It may be this Gentleman may be deceived by a Mistake It may be he knows not the Law which your Lordships may be pleased to acquaint him with That to stand Mute in High-Treason is all one as to Confess the Fact and will have the same Sentence and Condemnation upon them as if they had Confessed it Lord Chief Baron Then I 'le tell you the Law He that doth refuse to put himself upon his Legal Trial of God and the Countrey is a Mute in Law and therefore you must Plead Guilty or Not guilty Let his Language be what it will he is a Mute in Law Dan. Axtel I do not refuse it Court Then say Dan. Axtel I am Not guilty Clerk How wilt thou be Tried Dan. Axtel By twelve lawful men according to the Constitutions of the Law Court That is by God and the Countrey Dan. Axtel That is not lawful God is not locally here Clerk How wilt thou be Tried You must say By God and the Countrey Dan. Axtel By God and the Countrey Clerk God send you a good Deliverance Lord Chief Baron Mr. Axtel have you your Papers again Dan. Axtel Yes my Lord. Lord Chief Baron When your Indictment is read the second time when you come to your Trial you may take what Notes you please The Court then Adjourned to the same Place till the next morning seven of the Clock
October 11th 1660. The Court being Assembled the Keeper was commanded to set the Prisoners to the Bar. Thomas Harrison Adrian Scroop John Carew John Jones Gregory Clement Thomas Scot were brought to the Bar accordingly After which Silence was Commanded Court You that are Prisoners at the Bar if you or any of you desire Pen Ink and Paper you shall have it and if you or any of you will Challenge any of the Jury you may when they come to be Sworn and that before they are Sworn Sir Thomas Allen being called was desired to look on the Prisoner and lay his Hand on the Book his Oath was then read to him viz. You shall well and truly try and true deliverance make between Our Sovereign Lord the King and the Prisoners at the Bar whom you shall have in charge according to your Evidence So help you God Sir Joshua Ash being next called Mr. Scroop excepted against him Sir Jeremy Whichcot Baronet being next to be Sworn Mr. Harrison excepted against him James Halley Esquire being next to be Sworn Mr. Scot excepted against him Court If you will not agree speaking to the Prisoners in your Challenges we must be forced to Try you severally Henry Mildmay Esq being called next Mr. Scroop excepted against him Court We must needs Try them severally therefore set them all aside but Harrison Court Gentlemen you that are excepted must not depart the Court. Sir Joshua Ash being again called was excepted against by Mr. Harrison Sir Jeremy Whichot Baronet James Halley Esq Henry Mildmay Esq Christopher Abdy Esq Being called again were severally excepted against by the Prisoner Court Mr. Harrison You know the Law You must say I Challenge him Mr. Harrison I shall Sir Ralph Hartley being next called and being very sick humbly prayed to be excused by the Court which was granted Arthur Newman was called next Mr Harrison May I not ask of what Quality he is Court No Sir You are to Challenge him or not to Challenge him Mr. Harrison I Challenge him Thomas Blith was next called and also Challenged Here the People seemed to laugh Mr. Harrison My Lord I must make use of my Liberty in this Case Court God forbid Then Grover Robert Clark and Richard Whalley were called and by Mr. Harrison Challenged Court Mr. Harrison you know many to Challenge If you go beyond the Number at your own peril be it Mr. Harrison My Lord pray tell me what it is Court You say very well God forbid but you should know You may Challenge five and thirty Peremptorily If you go beyond you know the Danger Mr. Harrison My Lord I do not this to keep you off from the Business William Vincent and Henry Twiford were then called and Challenged John Lisle was next called Mr. Harrison I do not know him Mr. Lisle Nor I you Mr. Harrison He was Sworn Thomas Franklin Sworn Thomas Winter Challenged Richard Nichol Sworn Moyce being sick prayed Excuse which was granted accordingly Richard Cheyney Challenged Allen Parsons Challenged Henry Edlin called Mr. Harrison I Challenge him Mr. Harrison Let him be Sworn Court No No. Whereupon he was set aside Mr. Harrison If I have any Apprehension or knowledg of them that 's the thing that leads me to it as touching this man he may be Sworn Court When he is Challenged he cannot be recalled Mr. Harrison I am content Samuel Greenhill Sworn Thomas Bide Challenged John Page Challenged Richard Rider Challenged Mr. Harrison Lest I may run into an Hazard in making use of that Liberty which the Law gives me in this Case and having not taken Notice of any Perfons Challenged I mean as to the Number I desire your Officer that takes Notice may acquaint me with the Number Court You shall know it God forbid the contrary Edward Rolph was called next Mr. Harrison Mr. Rolph is his Name Let him be sworn Sworn Francis Beal Challenged John Kirk Challenged Charles Pitfield Challenged John Smith Challenged Bell Sworn Edward Franklin Challenged William Whitcomb Challenged Samuel Harris Sworn John Collins Challenged Thomas Snow Sworn William Blunt Challenged George Rigth Challenged John Nichol of Finchley Sworn Timothy Taylor Challenged Thomas Fruin Challenged Richard Abel Challenged Thomas Morris Sworn Ambrose Scudamore Challenged Ralph Halsel Challenged George Tirry Challenged Court You have Challenged Thirty three already Mr. Harrison I pray the Names may be read to me to see if it be so Court When you come to Thirty five you shall have the Names read John Galliard Challenged Thomas Swallow Challenged Court Now read their Names to him Which were read accordingly In all thirty five Challenged George Pickering was next called and Sworn Then they were called over who were admitted viz. Sir Thomas Allen John Lisle Thomas Francklin Richard Nichol Samuel Greenhil Edward Rolph Bell Samuel Harris Thomas Snow John Nichol Thomas Morris George Pickering and Sworn Proclamation was then made If any man can inform my Lords the King 's Justices the King ' s Serjeant or the King's Attorney before this Inquest be taken let them come forth and they shall be heard for now the Prisoner stands at the Bar upon his Deliverance And all those bound by Recognizance to appear let them come forth and give their Evidence or else to forfeit their Recognizance George Masterson James Nutley Robert Coytmore Holland Simson and William Jessop Witnesse were called Court Gentlemen that are not of the Jury Pray clear the Passage The Prisoner is here for Life and Death let him have Liberty to see the Jury Clerk Thomas Harrison Hold up thy Hand Clerk Look upon the Prisoner you that are Sworn You shall understand that the Prisoner at the Bar stands Indicted by the Name of Thomas Harrison late of Westminster in the Country of Middlesex Gentleman for that He together with John Lisle c. Here the Indictment was read upon which Indictment be hath been Arraigned and thereunto hath pleaded Not Guilty and for his Trial hath put himself upon God and the Countrey which Countrey you are Now your Charge is to enquire whether he be Guilty of the High Treason in Manner and Form as he stands Indicted or Not guilty If you find that he is guilty you shall enquire what Goods and Chattels he had at the time of committing the said Treason or at any time sithence If you find that he is Not guilty you shall enquire whether he did fly for it if you find that he fled for it you shall enquire of his Goods and Chattels as if you had found him Guilty if you find that he is Not guilty nor that he did fly you shall say so and no more And take heed to your Evidence Mr. Keeling Enforced the Charge at large After whom Sir Henneage Finch His Majesties Solicitour General in these words MAY it please Your Lordships we bring before your Lordships into Judgment this day the Murtherers of a King A man would think the Laws of God and Men had so fully secured
these Sacred Persons that the Sons of Violence should never approach to hurt them For My Lord the very Thoughts of such an Attempt hath ever been presented by all Laws in all Ages and all Nations of the World as a most unpardonable Treason My Lord This is that that brought the two Eunuchs in the Persian-Court to their just Destruction Voluerunt insurgere saies the Text and yet that was enough to Attain them And so My Lord it was by the Roman Laws too as Tacitus observes Qui deliberant desciverunt To Doubt or Hesitate in a Point of Allegiance is direct Treason and Apostasie And upon this Ground it is that the Statute upon which your Lordships are now to proceed hath these express Words If a man doth Compass or Imagine the Death of the King c. Kings who are God's Vicegerents upon Earth have thus far a kind of Resemblance of the Divine Majesty that their Subjects stand accountable to Them for the very Thoughts of their Hearts Not that any Man can know the Heart save God alone but because when the Wicked Heart breaks out into any open Expressions by which it may be judged 't is the Thoughts of the Heart which makes the Treason the Overt-Act is but the Evidence of it My Lords This Care and Caution is not so to be understood as if it were the Single Interest of One Royal Person only The Law doth wisely judge and foresee that upon the Life of the King depends the Laws and Liberties the Estates and Properties the Wealth and Peace the Religion and in Sum the Glory of the Nation My Lords This Judgment of the Law ha's been verified by a sad Experience for when that Blessed King whose Blood we are now making Inquisition for was untimely taken away Religion and Justice both lay buried in the same Grave with Him and there they had slept still if the miraculous Return of Our Gracious Sovereign had not given them a new Resurrection My Lords My Lord Coke in his Comment upon this Statute ha's one Conceit which is somewhat strange I am sure it is very new he seems to think that it would have added to the Perfection of this Law if there had been a time limited for the Party to be accused But certainly the work of this Day has quite consuted that Imagination For here is a Treason that has so long out-faced the Law and the Justice of this Kingdom that if there had been any time of Limitation in the Statute there would have been no Time nor Place left for Punishment And if this Treason had but once grown up to an Impunity it might perhaps have drawn the Guilt of that Innocent Blood and with it the Vengeance due to it upon the whole Nation The Scope of this Iudictment is for the Compassing the Death of the King the rest of the Indictment as the Vsurping Authority over the King's Person the Assembling Sitting Judging and Killing of the King are but so many several Overt-Acts to prove the Intention of the Heart We are not bound under favour to prove every one of these against every particular Person who is Indicted for he that is in at one is guilty in Law of all rest as much as if he had struck the Fatal Stroke it self Nay under favour if we can prove any other Overt-Act besides what is lai'd in the Indictment as the encouraging of the Souldiers to cry out Justice Justice or Preaching to them to go in this Work as Godly and Religious or any other act of all that Catalogue of Villanies for which the Story will be for ever Infamous this may be given in Evidence to prove the Compassing and Imagining the King's Death The conclusion of this Indictment alledges the Fact done to be to the great Displeasure of Almighty God and to the great Disgrace of the People of England A Truth so clear and known that it can neither be heightned by any Aggravation or lessend by any Excuse As for the Fact it self with the Manner of it I shall not need to open it at large for these things were not done in a Corner every true English Heart still keeps within it self a bleeding Register of this Story only my Lords in the way to our Evidence with your Lordships favour this I think may be fit to be said First for the year 1648. for that was the Fatal year of this King and beyond that year we shall not now enquire I say whatsoever in the Year 1648. could have been done by a Parliament to save the Life of a King was done in this Case They opened the way to a Treaty in spight of the Army and while these Sons of Zerviah who were too hard for them were engaged in Service in the Remoter Parts they hastened the Treaty as much as was possible the Debater upon His Majestie 's Concessions were Voted a good ground for Peace notwithstanding the Remonstrances of the Army still flew about their Ears and notwithstanding the Oppositions of a fearful and unbelieving Party of the House-of Commons whom the Army had frighted into an Awful and a Slavish Dependance upon them And when nothing else could be done for Him they were so true to the Obligations they lay under that they resolved to fall with Him and did so For the Army who saw the Treaty proceed so fast made as great hast to break it They seize upon the blessed Person of our Sacred King by Force and bring Him to London and here they force the Parliament shut out some Members imprison others and then called this wretched little Company which was left a Parliament By this and before they had taken upon them the Boldness to dissolve the House of Peers they pass a Law and Erect forsooth an High Court of Justice as they call it a Shambles of Justice appoint Judges Advocates Officers and Ministers sit upon the Life of the King Now they Speak out and Expound their own Declarations and tell us what that was which before they had demanded in obscure Terms when they called for Justice against all Delinquents Now they speak plainly what they mean and call this blessed King this glorious Saint the grand Delinquent Haec Acies victum factura Nocentem est My Lords When they had thus proceeded to appoint their Judges Officers and Court then they call this Person their onely Liege Lord and Soveraign to the Bar and by a formal Pegeantry of Justice proceed to Sit upon Him Arraign Try Sentence Condemn and Kill I had almost said Crucifie Him whom they could not but know to be their King And all this against the clearest Light the sharpest Checks and most through Convictions of Conscience that ever men resisted And yet in this moment of time such was the Majesty and Innocene of our Gracious Soveraign that the People followed Him with Tears in their Eyes and Acclamations in their Mouths God save the King even then when the Souldiers were ready to fire upon
them who did either look Sadly or speak Affectionately And yet it will appear upon our Evidence too that so few of the very Common Souldiers could be brought to approve these Proceedings or to cry out Justice that their Officers were fain by Money or Blows or both to bring a great many to it My Lords The Actors in this Tragedy were many very many so many that sure their Name is Legion or rather many Legions And certainly my Lords when we shall consider the Thing that they have done we cannot but look upon it as a Villany which had in it all the Ingredients to make it detestable that it was possible for the Counsel of Men or Devils either to put together But yet if any thing can be of a deeper Dy then the Guilt of that Sacred Blood wherewith they stand Polluted me thinks their Impudence should make them more odious then their Treason It was the destruction of God's Anointed in the Name of the Lord. It was the Murther of a most blessed and beloved Prince in the Name of His People Him whom they had taken the transcendent Boldness to imprison as the Author of the War they put to Death because He would have been the Author of our Peace and that with so much Scorn and Indignity that some of them were not ashamed to spit in the Face of our Lord and Sovereign And when they had thus quenched the Light of Israel Darkness and Confusion did over-spread the face of the Land many poor Subjects at Home and some Protestants in Foreign Nations at the very News of it fell down Dead as if this excellent King had been in a Natural as well as a Religious sence the Breath of our Nostrils the Anointed of the Lord who was taken in their Pits The Judges Officers and other Immediate Actors in this pretended Court were in number about fourscore Of these some four or five and twenty are dead and gone to their own place The God of Recompences hath taken the matter so far into His Own Hands and who knows but that it might be one dreadful part of His Vengeance that they died in Peace Some six or seven of them who are thought to have sinned with less Malice have their Lives spared indeed but are like to be brought to a severe Repentance by future Penalties Some eighteen or nineteen have fled from Justice and wander to and fro about the World with the Mark of Cain upon them are Perpetual trembling lest every Eye that sees them and every Hand that meets them should fall upon them Twenty nine Persons do now expect your Justice Amongst them the first that is brought is the Prisoner at the Bar and he deserves to be the first for if any Person now left alive ought to be stiled the Conductour Leader and Captain of all this Work that 's the Man He my Lord brought the King up a Prisoner from Windsor but how and in what manner with how little Duty nay with how little Civility to a common Person you will hear in time He Sate upon Him Sentenced Him he Signed the Warrant first to call that Court together then the bloody Warrant to cut off His Sacred Head Against him as against all the rest our Evidence will be of two sorts Witnesses Viva voce that shall first prove to your Lordships that every Person now in Question did sit in that Court when their King stood as a Prisoner at the Bar. We shall prove that the Precept by which this pretended Court was summoned was not obeyed and executed till it had had the hands and seals of most of the pretended Judges among the rest the hand of the Prisoner at the Bar will be found there We shall prove his hand to the bloody Warrant for severing the Sacred Head of our Blessed Sovereign from the Body and then some Circumstances of his Malice and of his Demeanour And after we have done with our Witnesses Viva voce if we have occasion to use Records of Parliament we shall shew them too for we have the Originals or authentick Copies But now we shall proceed to our Evidence Proclamation was made for Silence Sir Edward Turner My Lords The service of this Day doth call to my Memory the Story of good King Amaziah We read in Holy Writ that his Father King Joash was murthered and murthered by His own Subjects but we read further that when Amaziah had regained the Crown was settled in the Government He slew those that slew His Father He did go downe into Edom the Valley of Salt and there He did slay ten thousand The work of this Day doth very much resemble that Action Our Good and Gratious King His Father of blessed Memory and our Father His natural and our politick Father to whom our natural Allegiance was due was murthered and by His own Subjects But My Lords this was not a National Crime and our Good and Gratious Sovereign hath done us that Honour and Right to vindicate us in Forreign Nations and now He is come Home in Power and Glory He does continue in the same Mind that 's the Reason we are not now slain by thousands but that those Miscreants are gathered up here and there that did commit the Offence and would have involved the Nation in a common Infamy Gentlemen of the Jury Your time to enquire of this Matter is precious more pretious then my Words else I would repeat to you the History of the Tragedy at least that Summary that was entred in the Black Book or the Journals of that they then called a Parliament It shall suffice to tell you and that most truly that it was but an handful of men in respect of the whole Nation that did contrive and design this damnable and traiterous Plot to subvert the Laws and change the Government of this well-governed Nation In prosecution of which they did cast abroad and spread forth Jesuitical Maxims Damnable and Diabolical Principles to intoxicate the People and when their Heads were troubled they were easily lead into Arms where after some time they grew drunk with Successes and when they had drunk too much of the Loyal Blood of the People then they thirsted for the Royal Blood also I do confess we read in Stories that Kings have before this time been murthered some in our Nation as King Richard the Second and Edward the Third and in other Nations But the Actors of those Murthers were modest to these They did it in Private these in the Face of the Sun and the People but it was those People Gentlemen they had corrupted with Shares in their Robberies and Villanies They pretended it was in a way of Justice but you must know no Justice can be executed upon the Person of the King Touch not mine Anointed saith God himself My Lords I do read in the Roman Story that both amongst them and other Nations there was no Law against Parricide It was not thought that any man was
he is very much to be reproved Shall he pretend that one House nay the eighth part of a House for so it was can Condemn a King when both Houses cannot condemn one man in spight of the King I desire my Lords it may pass with a due Reproach and a Sentence upon it Lord Chief Baron It is true your Questions are but one Point You pretend the Parliament's Authority and when you come to speak of it you say the Commons of England They were but one House of Parliament The Parliament what is that It is the King the Lords the Commons I would fain know of you where ever you read by the light you say you have in your Conscience that the Commons of England were a Parliament of England that the Commons in Parliament used a Legislative power alone Do you call that a Parliament that sate when the House was Purged as they call it and was so much under the Awe of the Army who were then but forty or forty five at most Then you say It was done by Authority of them You must know where there is such an Authority which indeed is no Authority he that confirms such an Authority he Commits a double offence therefore consider what your Plea is If your Plea were doubtfull we should and ought and would our selves be of Councel for you That which you speak concerning Conviction of your own Conscience remember that it is said in Scripture that they shall think they did God good service when they slay you as it is in St. John He hath a great deal of Charity that thinks that what you did was out of a Conscientious Principle It was against the Light of noon-day and common practice You make your self a Sollicitor in the Business Let us blacken him as much as we can I have not touched at all upon the Evidence I will not urge it now I say you justifie it upon Convictions of Conscience and pretend it upon Authority A thing never known or seen under the Sun that the Commons nay a few Commons alone should take upon them and call themselves the Parliament of England We have been cheated enough by Names and Words there is no colour for what you say I do think and hope my Brethren will speak to this Case that none of us do own that Convention whatsoever it be to be the Parliament of England There was another aggravation at this Time that this Pretended Authority usurped that Power the Lords were then sitting You had not taken this usurped Power to dissolve these Lords No you did this Act in dispight of the Lords you had sent up an Ordinance to the Lords and they rejected it and thereupon these Members took it upon themselves Amongst those there were some Negatives and those Members were under the Awe and Power of your Forces at that time What you Plead the Court are of Opinion tends to the subversion of the Laws for you to usurp Power over the People without their Consents to call this the People We never knew the like before But the Parliament of England was the King Lords and Commons For you to speak of this Power and Justifie this Power is an Aggravation adding one Sin and Treason to another We shall tell you that neither both Houses of Parliament if they had been there not any single Person Community not the People either Collectively or Representatively had any colour to have any Coercive Power over their King And this Plea which you have spoken of it ought to be over-ruled and not to stand good Mr. Annesley I do the more willingly speak to this Business because I was one of those that should have made up that Parliament that this Prisoner pretends to I was one of that Corrupt Majority as they called it that were put out of the House He cannot forget that at that time there were Guards upon both Houses of Parliament to attend them that were of their own appointment and that those Guards were forcibly removed by the Prisoner at the Bar and his Fellows and other Guards put there who instead of being a Defence unto them when those Commons stood at the Door were by them threatned Yet the Lords and Commons of England in Parliament Assembled a full House of Commons did resolve notwithstanding what was aforesaid that the Treaty in the Isle of Wight was a Ground for Peace Afterwards the Major part of the House of Commons having resolved on this sent it up to the Lords that very day when they were Adjourned there were Forces drawn down to the House of Commons Door and none suffered to come into the House but those that they pleased All those that had a mind for Peace that minded their Duty and Trust and Allegiance to their King were seized on by this Gentleman and his Fellows When this was done what did he and those Fellows do They sate and put a check upon all that should come in None must come in but those that would renounce their Allegiance and Duty to their King and the People for whom they served and then declared against that Vote which had been passed upon Debate of twelve or fourteen hours and then to call this an House of Commons nay the Supreme Authority of the Nation he knows is against the Laws of the Land For the House of Commons alone cannot so much as give an Oath It hath not power of Judicature of Life and Death this he knows well to be according to the Laws of England He knows that no Authority less then an Act of Parliament can make a Law and he knows an Act of Parliament must be passed by the King Lords and Commons I wonder much to hear a Justification in this kind by one that knows the Laws of England so well There will none of the Court allow that that was a Parliament The Majority of that House did all disavow it These things have been already discoursed of I shall onely say that he knowing the Laws so well I hope he shall suffer for trangression thereof Mr. Hollis You do very well know that this that you did this horrid detestable Act which you Committed could never be perfected by you till you had broken the Parliament That House of Commons which you say gave you Authority you know what your self made of it when you pulled out the Speaker Therefore do not make the Parliament to be the Author of your black Crimes It was innocent of it You know your self what Esteem you had of it when you broke and tore it in sunder when you scattered and made them hide themselves to preserve them from your Fury and Violence Do not make the Parliament to be the Authour of your Crimes The Parliament are the three Estates It must not be admitted that one House part of the Parliament should be called the Supreme Authority You know what that Rump that you left did what Laws they made Did you go home to advise
have to say my Lords L. C. Bar. You Gentlemen that are sworn of this Jury you see the Prisoner Mr. Scroop hath been indicted for imagining and contriving the death of his late Majesty of blessed memory King Charles the first You see there are several things in this Indictment the charge is the Imagining and compassing the death of the King In the Indictment there are several matters of fact to prove this Imagination The Imagination is the Treason the matters of fact to prove it are but the evidences of that imagination if any one of them be proved to you it is sufficient the one is consulting and meeting together how to put him to death the other Sitting and Assuming Authority to bring him to Tryal Then you have a Sentence by the Court to put the King to Death thereupon Afterwards he was put to Death Any one of these matters are Evidence enough for you to prove the Indictment for though the Indictment concludes that so they did Imagine and Compass the Death of the King and that the King was put to Death in manner and form as aforesaid the manner and form aforesaid goes to this To the imagination of the Heart for the Law did not think any one would put the King to death they thought it so a Crime they thought it not convenient to bring it into the Statute But the Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King is made Treason Then to apply it this Fact to the Gentlemen it appears to you here by the proofs against him Here is Mr. Masterson he swears he saw him sit in that pretended Court there was your Evidence of the first the first was their Meeting together and of the second too They did Assume Authority upon them and he swears further to the Sentencing That the Prisoner was there Here were the Three Overt-Acts all proved He confesses he did sign the Warrant for putting the King to Death This without any Witness at all was a sufficient proof a Proof of proofs The other Witnesses you hear what they say you hear Mr. Kirk M. Clark M. Nutley swear all to his Sitting there It is true when this comes to the particulars where he sate you must remember it was Twelve Years ago when a man sees a mixt number of about Eighty Persons it is impossible a man should be able to answer this particular after Twelve years where such a one sate but you may see by his Sentencing what he did They all witness they saw him positively and one tells you He wondered he saw him there and indeed it might be a wonder for Mr. Scroop to give him his right was not a Person as some of the rest but he was unhappily ingaged in that Bloody Business I hope mistakenly but when it comes to so high a Crime as this men must not excuse themselves by ignorance or misguided Conscience As to God for this Horrid Murther of the King somewhat may be but there is no Excuse or Extenuation before Man there may be I say before the Lord. You see the Proof is full against this Gentleman as full as may be Witnesses saw him Sit and he himself confessed he signed the Warrants I have no more to say to you but Gentlemen you see what it is I think for matter of Fact you need not go from the Bar but I leave it to you Scroop My Lord Lord Chief Baron Mr. Scroop If you have any thing to say when the Jury have brought in their Verdict if you will say any thing for matter of Mercy the Court will hear you Scroop I thank your Lordship The Jury went together and presently settled themselves in their places Clerk A. Scr. Hold up thy hand Look upon the Prisoner How say you Is he guilty of the Treason whereof he stands Indicted and hath been Arraigned or not guilty Jury Guilty Clerk What Goods and Chattels c. Jury None that we know L. Chief Bar. If you will say any thing the Court will hear you Scroop I have no more My Lord but refer my self to this Honourable Court. Clerk Set John Carew Tho. Scot John Jones and Gregory Clement to the Bar who were set accordingly And being Commanded they severally held up their hands Clerk These men that were last called c. Sir Tho. Allen Lay your hand on the Book Look c. Carew I Challenge him L. C. Bar. Are you all agreed as to your Challenges Pris No my Lord. L. C. Bar. Then we must do as before sever you and go to Tryal severally Take the Three away and let Mr. Carew stand at the Bar. Challenged Charles Pitfield Wille Will. Smiths Rich. Rider Edward Rolph James Shercroft Tho. Vffman Francis Beal Will Whitcombe Samuel Harris Jo. Nicol of Finchley George Rigth Tho. Fruen Ab. Newman Tho. Blithe Will. Vincent James Hawley Chr. Abdy Tho. Bide John Smith Abr. Scudamore Ralph Halsel John Galliard In all 23. Jury Sworn Robert Clarke Thomas Grover Rich. Whaley Sam. Greenhil Nicholas Raynton Tho. Winter Rich. Cheney John Kerk Rich. Abel Thomas Morris George Tirrey Thomas Swallow In all 12. If any man can inform my Lords the King's Justices c. Cler. John Carew hold up thy hand You that are sworn look upon the prisoner You shall understand c. Sir Edw. Turner May it please your Lordships our Hue and Cry still proceeds against the Murtherers of our late Sovereign Lord King Charles the First of blessed memory and this Gentleman the prisoner at the Bar is apprehended as one among others for shedding that pretious blood Gentlemen of the Jury he stands indicted before you For that he I cannot express it better not having the fear of God before his eyes but being seduced by the instigation of the Devil he did imagin and compass the death of his said late Majesty In prosecution of this Gentlemen there be several things that are mentioned in the Indictment which are the open acts to discover to you these secret and private imaginations He did meet and consult with divers persons touching the death of the King that did usurp and take upon them to exercise a Power and Jurisdiction to try the King and finally most horribly put him to death The Treason by the Statute of 25 Edw. 3. and which you are to enquire of is the imagination and compassing the death of the King the rest of the Indictment are but particulars to prove that he did so imagine and compass the death of the King If we shall prove these or any of these facts you have then sufficient to convict them There was a thing they called a High Court of Justice that was set up wherein they did intend to try our late Sovereign Lord and a precept made and that under the hand and seal of the prisoner at the Bar amongst others for summoning and convening that bloody Court where among the rest of the Miscreants the prisoner at the Bar did sit and had confidence nay impudence
of the Lord and did weigh the things After that when the Bill was brought into the house my name was put in there with several others so I came to be in and what I did was upon these two Accounts First in obedience as I told you to the Lord which was the chief thing And in obedience to that which was then the Supreme Authority of this Nation and therefore I shall mention these grounds very briefly because indeed the things that are controverted here at this time they have been controverted in the Face of the whole world in several Nations and the Lord hath given an answer upon solemn Appeals to these things I shall therefore mention them very briefly because they have been so publique The Declarations and Remonstrances that have passed between the King and Parliament concerning the beginning of the Wars L. Chief Baron Mr. Ca. I would be very loth to interrupt you But I see what course is taken and the peoples eyes are upon you You seek delays and against the course of Prisoners you say you will confess but you do confess the Fact after you have spent the time And all the Witnesses are heard for this that you speak of now you go about to justifie as in the fear of the Lord or any thing of that nature that we cannot allow of but we do allow you to speak and give the heads of what you will say as to the matter of Fact but to hear you make discourses and debates which are a justification of a horrid and notorious Treason we cannot hear it we ought not to hear the maintaining of open Treason cannot hear you to speak that upon your opening which is Treason We are willing that you open the Heads what you have to say we are upon our consciences and to appear before God for what we do and so are you too but remember the Devil sometimes appears in the habit of an Angel of light If you will couch your matter in a few words the Court affords you liberty which is indeed beyond the strict Rules of Law Ca. You say you sit here by the Laws of the Land and are sworn to maintain the Laws We ought not that we should plead to this Indictment for what we did was by an Act of Parliament Court Pray Sir this must not be let fall without reproof or rather punishment Ca. I believe there is no Precedent for it Court Sir We know the act of Parliament as well as you and most of the standers by You go upon a false ground there was no such Act of the Supreme Authority as you pretend to these are but Phantasms of your own brain and must not be suffered these things have been controverted and decided many a time again and again Ca. I desire to have time to speak how it was begun and carried on or else how shall I be able to make my defence or to tell you what are the Heads I wil insist upon I shall declare the grounds upon which the Parliament did proceed L. Chief Baron Mr. Carew If that be your ground the Parliament did it the House of Commons did it I have something to offer not to interrupt you to the then Commons Ca. In my humble opinion for the maintaining of this It was by Authority the supreme Authority by which it was done L. Chief Baron Did you sign this Warrant for the summoning and warning of that Court And did you sign the Warrant for executing the late King Ca. I desire I may go on with my defence L. Chief Baron We would not have you be mistaken You seem to confess the act and now you justifie it you cannot speak any thing for your justification till you confess the fact Ca. I shall speak to that in its time L. Chief Baron You must speak to that first that is matter of Fact whereupon the Jury are to go Ca. There is matter of Law Court You must speak to matter of Fact first Ca. I say this is that I was about to say That the Supreme Authority Court You must speak to the Fact first Whether you did compass c. the Kings death or not that is the first ground if you did not there is an end of the business It is proved against you that you did it if you come to justifie it it must be when you have first agreed the matter of Fact Ca. I desire I may have liberty to proceed either for matter of Fact or Law as I list Court No no you must first speak to the Fact you may be after heard You know in all cases they must begin with the Fact either denying or extenuating For matter of Law in this case must arise from the fact Ca. But I humbly conceive there is a matter of Law in this case and it is matter of Law that is above the jurisdiction of this inferior Court Mr. Sol. Finch I pray that he may be held to the issue Guilty or Not Guilty If he deny the Fact let us relie upon our Evidence and he upon his he cannot come to Law till he hath confessed the Fact The question is Whether you did or not there is the Fact if you have any thing to justifie that follows Ca. I was upon that and going on to shew the reasons and grounds of it Court First you must confess it if you will shew the reasons why you did it Ca. I told you there was some things I did Coun. What are those some Ca. I do acknowledg that I was there at the Court. Coun. Did you sign the Warrants for summoning that Court and for Execution of the King Ca. Yes I did sign them both Coun. Then say what you will L. Chief Baron Now go on Ca. In the Year 1640. there was a Parliament called according to the Laws and constitutions of this Nation and after that there was some difference between the King and the Parliament the two Houses of Parliament Lords and Commons and thereupon the King did withdraw from the two Houses of Parliament as appears by their own Declaration The great Remonstrance printed in 1642. and thereupon the Lords and Commons did declare L. Chief Baron Mr. Carew The Court are of opinion not to suffer you to go on in this they say it tends not only to justifie your Act but you cast in Bones here to make some difference You talk of the Lords and Commons you have nothing to do with that business your authority that you pretend to was an Act of Parliament as they called themselves and that where there was but 46 Commons in the House and but 26 Voted it Ca. I say that the Lords and Commons by their Declaration Mr. J. Foster Hold your hand a while Sir not so fast you go to raise up those differences which I hope are asleep new Troubles to revive those things which by the grace of God are extinct you are not to be suffered in this it is not the singling
nothing but indeed to make a new Government which is the highest Treason next to the Murthering of the King in the world To subvert the Laws and to make a few of the Commons nay if they had been the whole to make them to have the Legislative power Mr. Scot if you have any thing in extenuation of the Fact we shall hear you further we cannot L. Finch If you speak to this purpose again for my part I will profess my self I dare not hear further of it It is so poysonous blasphemous a doctrine contrary to the Laws if you go upon this point I shall and I hope my Lords will be of that opinion too desire the Jury may be directed Scot. I thought my Lord you would rather be my Councel it is not my single opinion I am not alone in this Case therefore I think I may justifie my self in it it was the Judgement of many of the Secluded Members to own us to be a Parliament Lord Annesley What you said last doth occasion my rising you seem to deliver my opinion who you know could never agree to what you have alledged truly I have been heartily sorry to hear the defence you have made to day because you know I have had Letters from you of another nature I was very confident to have heard you an humble Penitent this day instead of justifying your self As to that which you say of the Secluded Members owning you to be a Parliament they were so far from it that you know for how many years they lay under sufferings and obscurity because they could not acknowledge that an Authority which was not so You cannot forget the Declaration of both Houses that was published upon a Jealousie that the people had they would change the Government of King Lords and Commons It was far from their thoughts it was called in that Declaration A black scandal cast upon them This Declaration you know was by Order of both Houses affixed in all Churches of England that people might take notice what they held to be the Fundamental Government of this Kingdom King Lords and Commons After this for you to set up another Government and under them to act such things that one would think should hardly enter into the heart of any man You know very well all along they declared themselves faithful Subjects to the King and so would have lived and dyed and you might have had your share of the happiness of that peace if you could have had an Inclination to submit to that which both Houses had resolved when you and others could not bring your hearts to stoop to your Fellow Subjects when you could not submit to that equal rule to take your share with them When Pride carried some so high then was the beginning of your fall and others and none could expect other than what is now come to pass That they should come to that shame and sorrow that this day hath brought upon you I could have wished to have heard nothing but an humble confession of the fault that hath been clearly proved and no Justification of it You have sworn among others to preserve the Laws and People of the Kingdom but you drove away not only the House of Lords but most of the Commons and then to give the name of a Parliament to the Remainder this is a great aggravation of your Treason I think we of the Secluded Members could not have discharged our duty to God and the Kingdom if we had not then appeared in Parliament to have dissolved that Parliament and so by our joynt assent put an end to all your pretences which if we had not done we had not so soon come to our happiness nor you to your miseries Lo. Ch. Bar. The Court hath told you before their opinions in the thing and no further debate is to be allowed in this the Justification of it doth comprehend treason We our selves are not by Law to allow the hearing of it If you have nothing to say for your self I must give direction to the Jury Scot. I humbly crave leave to move the Jury that they bethink themselves and consider of it rather as a special Verdict than of a definitive one I think there is cause of a special Verdict Court If there was need of a special Verdict We are upon our Oaths I should give direction to the Jury What We do We do upon our Oaths and must answer it before God Almighty The Court hath delivered their opinions before that in this Case the Pretended Authority under which you did derive that Power which you did execute that it is no Authority it is void in Law it is a foundation if it were true of subverting all Laws and indeed of all Religion a Power that you assumed to your selves of Judging and Condemning your King that you would countenance such an Authority is a great aggravation of the fault They are Jugdes whether you did Imagine or Compass the Kings Death that is all the Jurors have to do Gentlemen of the Jury Scot. I would know what particular Law I have transgressed in this thing Court The Law of God and Man 25 Edw. 3. Scot. I humbly conceive that reaches not to this Case Court To satisfie you in that the very words of the Statute are If any man do Compass or Imagine the Kings Death it is Treason The Indictment is That you did Imagine and Compass the death of the King if the Fact be proved against you you are within the Statute Scot. You will not say the King shall be a Traytor if he shall Compass the death of the Queen Court The Queen is a Subject Scot. I am not yet convinced Lo. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury Scot. I do plead and claim that I am within the Compass of several Pardons and desire Councel in that particular I do come within the Compass of his Majesties Pardon Lo. Ch. Bar. If you had not gone on to matter of Justification you might have been more heard to this of Pardon but after a Justification then to come for a Pardon which implies a confession of Guilt they are contradictory I must tell you we are now upon point of Law That Proclamation I doubt not but his Majesty will inviolably make good but we are not to judge of that it is nothing to a legal proceeding You are now in a Court of Law it is not to be pleaded in a Court of Law the Kings Pardon in Law must be under his Broad Seal How far you are under that Proclamation care will be taken and what is fitting to be done will be done but it is nothing in the matter of the Charge to this Jury Scot. I desire Councel touching the Statute of 25 Edw. 3. Court You should have done it before you had confessed the Fact Scot. I may do it in Arrest of Judgement Lo. Ch. Bar. Mr. Scot for that of the Kings Proclamation if you be within the benefit and
compass of it according to his Royal Word and Honour in it you will have the benefit of it but it is not a Plea in Law but it must be a Pardon under Seal whatsoever concerns that Proclamation will be considered It is nothing to the matter whereupon the Jury are to go Lord Chief Baron Gentlemen of the Jury you see the Prisoner Tho. Scot stands Indicted for Compassing and Imagining the death of our Dread Soveraign King Charles the First of most glorious and blessed memory He is Indicted for Compassing and Imagining his death there is the Treason and what is set afterwards in this Indictment is only to manifest this Compassing and Imagining because that being in the heart alone without some overt Act no body can prove it There are several overt Acts laid in the Indictment one is A Trayterous consulting and meeting together how to put the King to death Then a sitting upon the King as a Prisoner being before them about his life and death The third is Sentencing to death that which followed is That he was Murthered If any of these acts should be proved the Indictment is proved for the proof there are several Witnesses have fully proved that he did sit there several times particularly upon Jan. 27. which was the day of the Sentence That he did sit there all of them agree to that It is true as to the Circumstance where he sate one Gentleman saith he sate in the second Row on the left hand of Bradshaw you well remember it is 12. years ago how any man upon the view and after so long a distance of time should he able to remember in what posture one man was from the rest I think neither you nor I can remember Here is one proved to you that he did sign that Warrant for Executing the King he saith How can another know his Hand You see what the Witnesses say they knew it a man can prove nothing more of another mans Hand than that unless they see it written there is nothing to put upon you but his words You see what words are aggravated against Mr. Scot Whereas he saith It is a breach of the Priviledges of Parliament if it were so it is nothing to this Fact though another man should break the priviledges of Parliament it is nothing to you but besides it is not a breach of the priviledge of Parliament You have heard the Witnesses what they have said against him Mr. Lenthall swears that he did speak at large fully in owning that business of the Kings death The rest swear positively to the same effect and that at several times What was that He gloried in it defended it and said He could wish it were Engraven on his Tomb stone he hath denyed this that the Witnesses have proved That which is lest to you is whether upon all this matter that you have heard Whether the Prisoner at the Bar is Guilty of Compassing and Imagining the Kings death and so go together After a little Consultation together they setled in their places again Clerk Tho. Scot hold up thy hand Look upon the Prisoner at the Bar How say you is he Guilty of the Treason whereof he stands Indicted or not Guilty Jury Guilty Cl. Look to him Keeper Cl. You say the Prisoner is Guilty c. and so you say all Jury Yes Cl. Set Mr. Scot aside Clerk Set John Jones and Gregory Clement to the Bar. Which was done accordingly Thereupon the said Gregory Clement preferred his Petition to the Court. Indictment read against them both Lo. Ch. Bar. If you do confess your Offence your Petition will be read Clem. I do my Lord. Lord Ch. B. Mr. Clement if you do confess that you may understand it you must when you are called and when the Jury are to be charged You must say if you will have it go by way of Confession That you Wave your former Plea and confess the Fact Clerk Gregory Clement you have been Indicted of High Treason for Compassing and Imagining the death of his late Majesty and you have pleaded not Guilty Are you contented to wave that Plea and confess it Clem. I do confess my self to be Guilty my Lord. Clerk Set him aside Clkek John Jones hold up thy hand These men that were last called c. if you will Challenge all or any of them you must Challenge them when they come to the Book and before they are sworn Jones I confess I sate amongst them some days but not maliciously contrived the death of the King Coun. He is troubled at the Form he confesseth the Matter That he was there sitting in the High Court of Justice If he will not confess it he knows we can prove his Hand and Seal to that bloody Warrant He is troubled that he is said to have Trayterously and Maliciously Contrived the Kings death He that doth these Acts towards it is by Law responsible as to the Malice Jury Sworn Sir Tho. Allen Sir Henry Wroth Sir Jer. Whitchott James Hawley Henry Mildmay Christ Abdy Nich. Raynton Richard Cheney Tho. Bide Charles Pitfield Abraham Scudamore Charles Pickerne in all 12. Cl. Cryer make Proclamation Cryer If any man can inform c. Cl. John Jones hold up thy hand Look upon the Prisoner c. Mr. Soll. Gen. My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I must open to you as to other Juries that the short Point of this long Indictment is but this That the Prisoner at the Bar did Imagine and Compass the death of the King which is your Issue to Try We shall prove it by those overt acts which the Law doth require To prove the Sitting Sentencing and Signing the Warrant for Execution by the Prisoner at the Bar. Coun. Call Mr. Clark and Mr. Carr and Holl. Symson who were sworn Mr. Symson did you see the Prisoner at the Bar sitting in that which they called the High Court of Justice Sym. I did see Mr. Jones sit divers times both there and in the Painted Chamber Jones I do confess I sate divers times Coun. Did he sit the day of Sentence Sym. I cannot say it Coun. Mr. Clark you hear the question Pray answer my Lord. Clark My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I was there the 27. of Jan. 1648 I saw Coll. Jones there several days before but I did not see him that day his name was called but I do not know whether he was present Coun. Mr. Carr did you see him sit on the 27th day which was the day of Sentence Carr. My Lords he answered to his name some days I am not able to tell what day Mr. Nutley Sworn Coun. Can you tell whether the Prisoner at the Bar was present in that which they called the High Court of Justice Nutley The Prisoner at the Bar was several times in the Court which was called the High Court of Justice truly I cannot say whether he was there the 27th day the day of the Sentence The Warrant for Summoning that
demand that wicked Judgment before the Court pronounced it and he was the man that did against his own Conscience after he had acknowledged that he was a wise and gracious King yet says he That he must dye and Monarchy with him there in truth was the Treason and the cause of that fatal blow that fell upon the King This was his part to carry on how he did it as a wicked Counsellor we shall prove to you and the wages and reward of the Iniquity that he did receive James Nutley Sworn Councel Pray tell the Circumstances of the Prisoners Proceedings at Westminster Hall when he did exhibite a Charge against the King Mr. Nutley My Lords the first day of bringing his Majesty to his Tryal was Saturday Jan. 20. 1648. Before they sate in publick they that were of the Committee of that which they called the High Court of Justice did meet in the Painted Chamber which was in the forenoon of that day Being there I did observe that there was one Price a Scrivener that was writing of a Charge I stood at a great distance and saw him write and I saw this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar near thereabouts where it was writing I think it was at the Court of Wards This charge afterwards a Parchment writing I did see in the hands of this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar. A very little after that they called their names they did adjourn from the Painted Chamber into Westminster Hall the great Hall The Method that they observed the first thing was to call the Commissioners by name in the Act the pretended Act for trying the King was read that is when the Court was sat the Commissioners were called by their names and as I remember they stood up as their names were called The next thing was reading the Act for the trying of his late Majesty After that was read then this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar presented the Parchment Writing which was called the Impeachment or Charge against his Majesty Mr. Bradshaw was then President of that Court and so called Lord President he commanded that the Prisoner should be sent for saying Serjeant Dendy send for your Prisoner thereupon the King was brought up as a Prisoner and put within a Bar And when the Court was silenced and settled this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar did deliver the Charge the Impeachment to the Court and it was read The King was demanded to plead to it presently Here I should first tell you that upon the Kings first coming in there was a kind of a Speech made by Mr. Bradshaw to the King in this manner I â—hink I shall repeat the very words Charles Stuart King of England the Commons of England assembled in Parliament taking notice of the effusion of blood in the Land which is fixed on you as the Author of it and whereof you are guilty have resolved to bring you to a tryal and Judgment and for this cause this Tribunal is erected There was little reverence given to his Majesty then which I was troubled at he added this further That there was a charge to be exhibited against him by the Solicitor General I think this Gentleman was so called at that time and he called to him to exhibit the Charge and this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar did deliver an Impeachment a Parchment writing which was called a Charge against the King at that time which was received and read against him Coun. Did you ever see the Charge which was now shewn to Mr. Nutley Mr. Nut. My Lords I do believe that this is the very Charge I am confident it is the same writing I have often seen him write and by the Character of his hand this is the same Council Go on with your story Mr. Nut. My Lords immediately upon the delivery of this Charge of Impeachment which was delivered in the Kings presence after it was read the King was demanded to give an answer to it His Majesty desired to speak something before he did answer to the pretended Impeachment for so his Majesty was pleased to call it He did use words to this purpose saith he I do wonder for what cause you do convene me here before you he looked about him saith he I see no Lords here where are the Lords upon this Mr. Bradshaw the President for so he was called did interrupt his Majesty and told him Sir saith he you must attend the business of the Court to that purpose you are brought hither and you must give a positive answer to the Charge saith the King you will hear me to speak I have something to say before I answer after much ado he was permitted to go on in the discourse he was in so far as they pleased His Majesty said I was in the Isle of Wight and there I was treated with by divers honourable persons Lords and Commons a treaty of peace between me and my people the treaty was so far proceeded in that it was near a perfection truly saith he I must needs say they treated with me honourably and uprightly and when the business was come almost to an end then saith he was I hurried away from them hither I know not by what Authority now I desire to know by what Authority I was called to this place that is the first question I shall ask you before I answer the charge It was told him by Mr. Bradshaw the President that the Authority that called him hither was a lawful Authority he asked him what Authority it was the second time it was answered him by the President that it was the Authority of the Commons of England assembled in Parliament which he affirmed then to be the Supream Authority of this Nation the King said I do not acknowledge its Authority Authority if taken in the best sense it must be of necessity understood to be lawful therefore I cannot assent to that I am under a Power but not under an Authority and there are many unlawful Powers a Power that is on the high way I think I am under a Power but not under an Authority you cannot judge me by the Laws of the land nor the meanest Subject I wonder you will take the boldness to impeach me your lawful King To this purpose his Majesty was pleased to express himself at that time with more words to that purpose The King went on to further discourse concerning the Jurisdiction of the Court Bradshaw the President was pleased to interrupt him and told him several times that he trifled out the Courts time and they ought not to indure to have their Jurisdiction so much as questioned Court Pray go on Mr. Nutly This Gentleman at the Bar I did hear him demand the Kings answer several times a positive answer was required of the King the K. often desired to be heard and he interrupted him again and again several times and at length it was pray'd that the charge that was exhibited against him
the Bar concerning the Trial of his late Majesty Mr. Starkey My Lords this Gentleman now Prisoner and my self have been acquainted a great while being of the same Society of Grayes-Inne and truly my Lord I confess I owe all my knowledge in the Laws to that Gentleman when 〈◊〉 came first he was accused for debt and was pleased to do me and several other Gentlemen now and then the favour to reason the Law with us and assist us in the beginning of the long Parliament that is to give you an accompt of his being indebted he did desire I would do my endeavour to get his Protection Near the time of the Kings Trial there was a Gentleman with my self one Samuel Palmer of Grays-Inne which frequented his Company had several nights the opportunity of understanding the affairs at Westmin and truly he himself did seem to us to count that a very ridiculous Council I remember what he said one night I think they are all mad which was within two or three days before the Kings tryal and instanced how a Fellow cryed out to the Lord Fairfax that if he did not consent to the proceedings he would kill Christ and him After that I did not think he did go to this Council for imployment but out of curiosity when the King came to Tryal we heard that Mr. Cook was the person that was Solicitor and Acted that part that you have heard of and that during that Tryal whether the second or third day I cannot say that certainly Mr. Cook came to Grays-Inne that evening about Ten or Eleven of the clock at might only upon some particular occasion as he said I being walking in the Court in the walk before my Chamber with another Gentleman I did see him pass out of a house to go back again I thought it was he called after him Mr. Cook said I upon that he turned back and met me I took him by the hand said I I hear you are up to the ears in this business no saith he I am serving the people truly said I I believe there is a thousand to one will not give you thanks said I I hear you charge the King for the levying war against the Parliament how can you rationally do this when you have pulled out the Parliament to make way to his Trial he answered me you will see strange things and you must wait upon God I did ask him but first he said this of himself said he he was as gracious and wise a Prince as any was in the world which made me reflect upon him again and asked how he could press those things as I have heard what answer he made to that I cannot tell I did by the way inquire what he thought concerning the King whether he must suffer or no he told me he must die and Monarchy must die with him Cook Whether was this after or before the Sentence Mr. Starkey It was before the Sentence for it was either the second or third Trial or rather in some interim of time before the Sentence for there was an adjournment for a day or two but I am sure it was before the Sentence Court Mr. Cook they have concluded their Evidence plead for your self what you think fitting Cook My Lord I have been a Prisoner three months I humbly desire to acknowledge his Majesties and his Councils favour that I was not put into a Jeremy's Prison but in the Tower and not in Irons I give your Lordships humble thanks for that and truly considering the nature of the Charge had it been in some other Kingdom they would have served us as Iohn Baptist in prison I thank you that I have a fair Trial with the Judges of the Law who are upon their Oaths to do equal right and justice between our Soveraign Lord the King and every Prisoner concerning matters of life and death and likewise those Noble Lords that though they are not put upon their Oaths but upon their honour if they know any Law to preserve my life I trust they will rather save than destroy My Lords I do therefore say as Paul said my plea is much of that nature against the Law and against Caesar I hope I have not offended at all and so I have pleaded not guilty The learned Council have examined several witnesses against me and I humbly conceive that the matter will rest in a very narrow compass the substance of the Charge so far as my memory will serve doth rest in these three things the other being but matter of form That I with others should propound consult contrive and imagine the Death of the late King Secondly That to the perfecting and bringing about this wicked and horrid conspiracy that I with others did assume a Power and Authority as I remember power I am sure then to kill and murther the King thirdly That there was a person unknown that did cut off the Kings head and that we were abetting aiding assisting countenancing and procuring the person or words to that effect against the form of the Statutes and so forth I hâ—ve twelve poor words to offer for my self in this business wherein if I do not answer every thing that hath been particularly objected I hope you will give me leave afterwards to offer it First I humbly propound this that if it was not made appear to your Lordships that I did ever propound consult advise contrive attempt or any way plot or counsel the death of His Majestie then I hope I cannot be found guilty within the Statute of 25. Edward the third for the naked truth Mr. Nutly hath in a great part spoke to I was appointed upon the tenth of January 1648. for to give my advice concerning a Charge there having been upon the ninth a Proclamation for the Trial and upon the tenth Mr. Steel Dr. Dorislaus and Mr. Ask and my self were appointed and ordered to be of Council to draw up a Charge Here I have the order attested by Mr. Jessop and pray it may be read Court They do admit the thing that you were so assigned Cook Then I humbly conceive that that cannot be said to be done maliciously or advisedly or with any wicked intention in me which I was required and commanded to do Acting only within my Sphere and Element as a Counsellour no otherwise The next thing is this my L. that by Law words will not amount unto Treason we usually say that words may declare an Heretick but not a Traytor there were some Statutes formerly 1 Ed. 6. were words are made Treason but they are all repealed by 1 Mariae that nothing shall be Treason but what is expressed in 25 Ed. 3. this Objection will seem to lye that these were words put in writing and that I humbly conceive to be the greatest matter objected to which I answer 1. Whether there be any full certain clear proof that that is my hand to the Charge I must leave to you two or three
crimes soever they have committed Except such as by a Free Parliament shall be excepted a legal Parliament called by the Writ of the King which this Parliament is not To that I give these answers First my Lord I do say that this letter of our gracious Soveraign from Breda in it self undoubtedly is no Pardon in Law for Treason that cannot be without the Broad Seal Next a Pardon under the Great Seal in such a form of words as this is would not be a Pardon for Treason for that must not be pardoned by implication but by positive words so in the Case of Sir Walter Raleigh a Commission directed to our well be loved Subject would not pardon the Treason of which he was condemned In the next place this Letter at the most is but a pardon in honour which must always be taken according to the meaning And that the Kings Honour may for ever be sacred I say this Letter doth no way help the Prisoner at the Bar. First it is plain by the very Superscription of this Letter 〈◊〉 which the Declaration was inclosed that it is directed to the Speaker of Our House of Commons in Parliament assembled which cannot possibly be expounded of any other Parliament than that which was then sitting to whose Speaker it was written Secondly the Letter it self says we have left it to you to provide for security and Indempnity and again if there be a â—â—ying sin for which the Nation may be involved in infamy 〈◊〉 cannot doubt but you will be as solicitous to vindicate as we can be And then in this very letter encloseth that declaration upon the penning of which the prisoner so much relies Now lay all together and it is clear the Parliament meant by the Declaration must be the same Parliament which was meant by the Letter and that was this very Parliament whom the King intended to trust both with Indempnity and with the vindication of his Fathers death and to be the dispensers both of mercy and Justice in this particular Another thing is this This very Parliament as the Prisoner observes they did go to the King according to His gracious letter and in the behalf of all the good people of England they did lay hold of the Kings mercy in His letter and Declaration and prayed that this claim by their Speaker in the behalf of all the rest of the Commons of England might be effectual to all purposes and for all persons other than those that should be by themselves afterward excepted according to their requests His Majesty accepts their Petition and makes Proclamation that his Pardon should extend to all but such as they should except what can be more clear and evident than that this is the Parliament which the K. did mean to be the very Parliament to which the Letter should have reference till the Act of Oblivion was passed again the late transactions of these twelve years past had involved so many persons that we could scarce find a man his he had need of mercy nay this very Parliament to which the Letter was written had need of Indempnity and it is probable in the nature of the thing or can it be understood by any man that the King writing to this Parliament and offering them pardon and Indempnity should mean such a pardon and Indempnity as future Parliament to be called by his own Writ should be willing to afford them Whose hearts would have been satisfied with so contingent a security My Lords upon the whole matter by what the King hath said in this Letter and by what the Parlim hath done in pursuance thereof and by what the King hath proclaimed it is to my understanding as clear as the noon day that the honour of the King is not concerned at all in the exemption of the prisoner at the Bar and for the Cases of my Lord of Essex and Southampton which he hath cited they make against him they were condemned because they endeavoured to imprison the Queen and to remove her Councellours of which very fact the Prisoner is in Law guilty too and then the case of King Philip the Husband of Queen Mary makes nothing for him neither unless he will speak out and tell us plainly that because by a former violence the King was made a prisoner he became but like a titular King as King Philip. In the next place he saith my Case is out of the Law I acted as a Councellour in my own particular for my Fee it was avaritia but not malitia nor falso malitiose or Proditorie But he must know that no man hath or can have a lawful calling to pursue the life of his King and the Law implies malice for malitiose and proditorie are not only words of course but of truth too in this case else it were as much as to say that no Councel can be guilty of High Treason than which nothing can be more absurd My Lord for that which he said last for I must omit some things and give him leave to take the advantage of it to stand upon it that the place was a Court such a one it was that he was not answerable for the constitution of it if it were not in a legal sense it was such an order as might bear him out that is with modesty and good manners to justifie High Treason it is not with such insolency as some others before him did it but it amounts to that That an order of a few persons that first made themselves a Parliament and then made a Court of Justice had Officers and met together and perfected so great a Treason I say that this Order to bear him out is impossible He that is a Lawyer he must accompt to the Laws for what he hath done if the authority were not lawful he cannot but know that this which he calls the Parliam was so far from a legal Authority that it was one part of the Treason that he did assist such an Assembly Gentlemen of the Jury this is your own Case here is a charge that is exhibited by the prisoner at the Bar as he saith in the name of all the people of England Look to it for you are some of them if you own it then it may be true what he hath said but I hope you meet here to tell this Nation and all the world that the people of England had no hand in that charge do but consider how that this prisoner at the Bar had hunted the life of the King how he did fish out and examine evidence whether the King set up his Standard at Nottingham was at such a place and such a place to what end is all this but with design of blood Were these things to be produced against the King and then Judgement to be demanded that he may be saved Is it not plainly proved to you by Witnesses how he did exhibit the Charge press it aggravate it desired it might be taken pro
confesso was afflicted with the delays how angry he was when he was interrupted Is it not proved to you that he was at first against the thing and said it was a base business when he was engaged in it said that he was a Servant of the people of this Kingdome what doth he do at last when the thing had gone far he speaks that which is the only truth which I have yet heard from him He must dye and Monarchy then must perish with him from which Event good Lord deliver us Sir Edward Turner My Lord the substance of the defence that the Prisoner hath made at the Bar with much skill and cunning may be referred to two heads The first to the Statute of the 25 of Edward the 3. The second to the late Act of Oblivion for the first my Lord he saith that his fact is not comprized within that Statute saith he I did never conspire or imagine the death of the King nor did believe that would be a consequent of their actings It was expresly proved that himself did say that the King must die and Monarchy with him but Gentlemen though he had said true that it had not been proved or that he did not believe that would be a consequent yet my Lord I must tell you that every step of this Tragedy was Treason the summoning themselves that was Treason every proceeding upon that was Treason the summoning of their meetings in the Painted Chamber coming into Westminster-Hall every person as instrumental those that came to act the least part in that Tragedy were every one guilty of Treason what saith he I acted as a Councellour for my see It was that see that Judas had the 30. pieces of silver that made him hang himself He goes further and tells you there must be no semblable Treasons this is clear the conspiring and imagining the death of the King that 's the Treason that is mentioned in the Act Treason by the Common Law though this be not named the killing of the King yet all these proceedings are demonstrations to you there was a Secret Imagination to kill him Then to the Act of Oblivion his Argument is That because the Act saith that if they had Sentenced signed or been Instrumental in the death of the King that they should be excepted but it is not said or otherwise Instrumental that therefore this should refer to subsequent not precedent Acts that 's a strange Exposition take it Grammatically it hath the most large construction Instrumental more large than if they had said or otherwise for it doth comprehend every thing There having been so full an answer already I will be short I will not meddle with his civil debts but with his Political If a man kill another though he doth repent the Magistrate must do Justice in terrorem Though he doth repent I hope in God he doth so The Magistrates your Lordships must do Justice in terrorem I desire that Justice may be done upon that man He said it was no Treason to demand Justice against the King because he did but demand it I hope he will think it no unkindness in me to desire judgement against him because it is just Mr. Wadham Windham As I understand the Prisoner at the Bar the chief argument which he shelters himself under was his profession which gives a blast to all of us of the long robe I will not mince his arguments saith he here was a Court I was appointed Sollicitor and saith he for men to practise before those that have not a proper Judicature it is not Felony Murther or Treason I would not willingly mince his Argument and that I was appointed and the words dictated to me and a Councellor carrying himself within the compass of his profession is not answerable but if he will exceed his bounds his profession is so far from sheltring him that as it hath been opened it is very much an aggravation it is the duty of a Councellor to give Counsel if a man shall come to me and ask counsel and I shall counsel him to kill a man am not I accessary to that murder Words by his argument will not amount to Treason if the fact follows I am as guilty as if I did the fact in point of Treason it is all one as if I had done that very act If Mr. Cook did advise that Act or was instrumental he is as much a Traytor as the man in the Frock that did the Execution for his profession truly my Lord I do not think that a Counseller is always bound to know the patent of him that sits as Judge that will not be his Case here was no ordinary Warrant of Law to carry on Justice Grotius saith in case of necessity for carrying on Justice there may be many things allowed I pray where did Mr. Cook read of such a Court as a High Court of Justice there was never such a High Court of Justice read of in the Law then as this was a mock Court so under good favour it was a mock Jurisdiction Was there any Law under Heaven to put the King to death is it not out of the compass of all Courts whatsoever to do it and under good favour my Lord this is but to shelter a mans self under colour of Justice to do the most execrable Treason in the World I have no more to say to you Lo. Ch. Bar. I would repeat the Evidence and your answer to you if you have any thing new speak to it Cook This is new it was said by one that if there had been no charge there had been no sentence given in the Case I say that the Indictment or Charge is no part of the Tryal by the Statute of Magna Charta The Peers of the Land shall be tryed by Peers but are indicted by the Countrey I conceive by what they have said they do make me causal of the Kings death It is said in the Indictment there was a power I say this I did not assume any power it cannot be said if Council be come in to an unlawful power that he takes the power but stands with respect at the Bar. At Assises Judgement passes the Clerk of the Assises he is not instrumental in taking away life for that which Mr. Starkey should say that I should say The King must die and Monarchy with him I humbly beg that the Jury would take notice of what Mr. Nut. said that I told him there was no intention of taking away the Kingslife and besides it is but a single witness I hope there must be two witnesses in point of Law to convict a man of High Treason Lo. Ch. Baron Mr. Cook you said right but even now that if there was any thing in matter of Law which the Court knows of which may be of advantage to you they are of Council to you and so they ought to be Cook I think your Lordships L. Ch. Bar. I shall repeat the whole Evidence and
that you did desire Judgement should be given against him and not so much you as the blood that had been shed that cryed for Judgement truly whether that was a Judgement that you intended for acquital that must be left to the Jury You asked because I will repeat it in order as my memory will give me leave whether there was any other words in the charge than was in the Proclamation Mr. Cook Whether there was any other words or no that differed in the Proclamation as it was a great sin and foul fact in the Proclamation so it was as foul in the Charge Master Masterson swears the same too he heard you say the second day you had delivered a charge the day before against the King and that he had delayed his answer you desired he might plead guilty or not guilty the last day that you did in the names of the Commons Assembled in Parliament and the people of England demand Judgement against the King and then another swears those words Judgement against the Prisoner at the Bar which was the King Burden swears you examined him as a Witness against the King in what place he was with the King It seems he was in the King's Army he swears you gave him an Oath it is testimony fit to be believed but however if you did not give the Oath by what you say your self you may be by and asked him the question Master Starkey he tells you that during the Tryal and before the Sentence that you being an old acquaintance of his in Grayes-Inn speaking with him he spake like a friend to you I hear you are up to the ears in this business and whereas you talk of the people there is a thousand for one against it that you should tell him again You will see strange things but you must wait upon God these words of waiting upon God are words of that nature people do use them now adaies when they would do some horrid impiety which hath been the sin of too many it is but a canting language that is the best term I can give it you told him then He must die this was before the Sentence that is to be observed Gentlemen of the Jury you say you did not know of the Sentence you said He must die and Monarchy with him you must here know that some of those persons that sate upon him said the King was a gracious and wise King and as Mr. Cook did say and they were the best words they spoke and I think he thinks so in his conscience but in conclusion He must die and Monarchy must die with him others said they did not hate King Charles but they hated Monarchy and Government but Monarchy was the thing that they would behead I think I have done with the Evidence that was given against you the Indictment it self was read the Overt acts was the meeting propounding consulting about it It appears he was in the Chamber about the Charge that he did propound it he delivered the Charge it appears withal that he demanded Judgement he desired the King might answer or that it might be taken pro confesso these are overt acts to declare the imagination of his heart The answer of Mr. Cook I will repeat it as clearly as I can because nothing shall go to the extenuating of the fact but it shall be spoken Mr. Cook in your answer your defence that you make you set forth the heads of this Indictment and you set them forth very truly the heads are the aggravations of the Indictment the Indictment was the compassing and imagining the death of the King you said it was upon these grounds that you did propound abet and consult the death of the King that you with others did assume power and authority to kill the King that thereupon a person unknown in a Frock did accordingly kill the King You say to the first part if it did not appear that you did advise the death of the King that you were not guilty for that Sir as I told you before taking them either complexly or singly if any of the particulars reached to one of these acts it was enough but it reaches to all you required Judgement against the King as a Traytor and that with a reason and certainly death must follow you say you were appointed to give your advice you had a Proclamation first for Tryal of the King you had the Order of Jan. 10. whereby you were appointed to give your advice if it were so it will be no excuse at all the Proclama gives you no warrant at all he that obeys so wicked a Proclamation it will not save him it appears you were privy to this before the Proclamation if you were not at all when such a thing as this is such a Proclamation and Act and such a manner of Tryal as I believe though you have read very much you never heard of such a thing in our Law or foreign Nations That you thereupon should take upon you to be of Council against the King it aggravates the fact other men may be impudent ignorant but you that were a learned Lawyer your being of Council doth aggravate the thing You say Secondly by Law words will not amount to Treason for that I would not have that go for Law by no means though it be not your Case for you are not indicted for words but words are Treason and Indictments are often for it but the difference is this The Indictment is not for words but compassing and Imagining the death of the King words are evidences of the compassing imagining the Kings death It is the greatest evidence of the imagination of the heart Words do not make a Treason that is if it be by inference or consequence but reductively but if it be immediately I shall say to a man go kill the King by theat which is an absolute immediate necessary consequence to say this is not Treason I would not have that go for Law your Case is not for words but for delivering a Charge the ground that you speak of words may make a Heretick but not a Traytor it was a witty saying but you have no sufficient authority for it these are words put in writing we all know if a man put his words in writing if a man speak Treasonable words and put them in writing they have been several times adjudged Treason and so in my Lord Cook 's 3. Institutes the Case of Williams of the Temple there was a Book of Treason in his own Study of his making and he was indicted for it words put in writing is an express evidence of the imagination of the heart you say it was dictated to you but when words are written in a Charge and your name to it which I had almost forgotten that 's more than words the Witnesses swear the likeness of your hand they do but swear the likeness of your hand no man can swear
more unless he was present and see it but you owned the Charge and there your name is that besides the two Witnesses there is your own actions to prove it When two Witnesses shall swear it is like your hand and you own that Charge I must leave it to the Jury you say you did this after command the words were dictated to you the words were conceptis verbis appointed and ordered by the Court but the pressing was yours he stands upon delays let it be taken pro confesso demanding Judgement these were your words another man may dictate a thing but you are not forced to speak it you urged it owned it you demanded not in the name of the Court but in the name of all the People of England you say further that your demanding Justice is not within the Statute as I said before what can be the effect of demanding Justice but that the King should die upon those premises you say further that it was in behoof of the King as you would urge it to do the King a Courtesie in asking the King might have Justice but you did not name what Justice it was but you did him a Courtesie truly the King was but a little beholden to you for that request all the world knows what that demanding of Justice was it was to have the Kings head cut off you went as far as you could it ended with you when you demanded Justice that is as far as you could you cut off the head S. Paul when the Witnesses laid down the clothes at his feet he said I killed Stephen the Martyr You say further that in all Tragedies the Accuser or Witness the Jury the Judge and executioner are the only persons and you are none of these you are only of Council if Justice was not done what was it to you you said you did not assume a power there was only Eloquence required in the Councel it hath been truly said that this is a great aggravation to be of Councel against the King you said his Majesty was then a Prisoner and accused Counsel cannot be heard against the King you undertake to be Counsel against the King in his own person and in the highest Crime if the Council at the Barr in behalf of his Client should speak Treason he went beyond his sphere but you did not only speak but acted Treason you said you used not a disrespective word to the King truly for that you hear what the witnesses have said you pressed upon him you called it a delay you termed him not the King but the Prisoner at the Bar at every word you say you did not assume an authority it is an assumption of authority if you countenance and allow of their authority you say you do not remember you demanded Judgement against the King that is fully proved against you you your self asked the question whether you did say against the King he did not remember but others positively that you demanded Judgement against the King and Prisoner at the Bar you said that before Sentence there was not an intention to put the King to death to that Mr. Starkey swears that you expresly said the King must die and Monarchy with him and this before the sentence whereas you say this is but one witness that there is to be in Treason two witnesses but that there should be two witnesses to every particular that is an Evidence of the fact that is not Law if to one particular that is an Evidence there be one witness another to another here are two witnesses within the meaning of the Statute two witnesses to the Indictment compassing and imagining the Death of the King being accompanied with other circumstances this one witness if you believe him is as good as twenty witnesses because other overt acts are expresly proved by several witnesses You say next for the drawing of the Charge in right reason it ought to be counted for the service of the King First you do acknowledge and truly very ingenuously that in the time of peace to bring him to the Bar not being a prisoner is Treason you say it according to the Law and that you delivered the charge for the accelerating of the Charge and that it was not done by you traiterously you say the King was a Prisoner before and you say what hands he was in in the hands of men of power and violence it had been your duty to have delayed it not accelerated it that there might have been some means of prevention of that bloody act that followed if you knew that to be Treason to make him a prisoner Subjects do not use to make Kings Prisoners but Death follows You urge in the next place the Act of Indemnity and that you are not excepted for that you have made as much of it as the matter will bear yet you must consider First as a rule in Law that where they are general words when they come to be explained by the particulars you shall not include them within the general Mark the very words they are these Provided that this Act nor any thing therein contained shall extend to pardon discharge or give any other benefits whatsoever unto such and such among whom you are named nor any of them nor to those two persons or either of them who being disguised by Frocks and Vizards did appear upon the Scaffold erected before White-Hall upon the thirtieth of January 1648. All which persons these are the words First It shall not extend to you then it comes All which persons for their execrable Treason in sentencing to death or signing the Instrument for the horrid murther or being Instrumental in taking away the Precious Life of our late Soveraign Lord CHARLES the First of glorious Memory are left to be proceeded against as Traytors to His late Majestie according to the Laws of England and are out of this present Act wholly excepted and foreprized First as I told you before and as it was very well said by Master Sollicitor admitting the reason had been mistaken and that you had not been comprehended in the reason you are excepted out of the body provided it shall not extend c. Many times Laws do make recitals which in themselves are sometimes false in point of fact that which is the Law is positive words the other words are for the reason Excepting all which that is Master Cook which persons are excepted not for doing of it but for his execrable crimes in being instrumental It is clear without that if it were not so we say when a Sentence is or such a one or such a one the third Or makes all disjunctive Here are three Or 's first in sentencing to death or signing the Instrument then comes this or being instrumental in taking away the precious life of our late Soveraign c. this Or doth clearly exclude the other two or instrumental not only in point of death but further being neither a Sentencer Signer or being
instrumental in taking away the Kings life that is being any way instrumental Truly whether it be not instrumental to exhibit a Charge against him or complain of his delayes to ask Justice against him in the name of the people to do all this and desire that the Charge might be taken pro Confesso if this be not instrumental I know-nothing else Sentencing and signing Some signed the Sentence some the instrument for death the next degree of being Instrumental the highest degree of that is to accuse him to deliver in the Charge against him in the name of the people do it again and again be angry at the delayes The next thing is this that you did not do this falso or malitiose but for your Fee and that though there might be avaritia there was not malitia in it it was done by your Profession you were not Magisterial in it you thought the consequences that did follow would not follow If a man does but intend to beat a man and he dye upon it you know in Law it is all one You must understand there is a malice in the Law If a man beat one in the Streets and kill him though not maliciously in him but it is so in Law That you desire to have the benefit of the Kings Declaration that you did put in your petition proving the same that you were a prisoner before that the Commons in behalf of themselves and the people of England they craved the benefit of it which was granted excepting such as should be by Parliament exceptd and that the King should mention a Free Parliament for this it hath been fully answered to you and clearly by Mr. Sollicitor that you are not at all concerned in the Kings Declaration at Breda For first it is nothing in Law it binds in honour and we have given the same directions yesterday upon the like occasion that is that the Kings Declaration binds him in honour and in Conscience but it does not bind him in point of Law unless there were a pardon granted by the Broad Seal the thing is cleared to you what Parliament the King meant by it they were sitting at that time had acknowledged their dutie and allegiance to their King they went ad ultimum potentiae for a free and absolute Parliament whilst the King was absent though the King was away yet notwithstanding the King Declared whom he meant he directed one of those Declarations to our Speaker of the house of Commons and another to the Speaker of our Peers in this case it was loquendum ut vulgus it was owned by him as having the name of a Parliament it was done with great wisdom and prudence and so as it could be no otherwise they that were loyal subjects acting in the Kings absence he consenting to it the King owning that Authority so he was obliged in honour no further than his own meaning and words but there is another Clause in the act excludes all these persons The next thing is this you say the Statute of 25 Edward 3. and it is very true you say if it be any semblable Treason we were not to judge upon that unless they were the Treasons in the Act and it is most true now you would urge but this that this is but a semblable Treason but you are indicted for the compassing and imagining the Death of the King if these Acts did not tend to the compassing and imagining the Kings death I know not what does I am satisfied you are convicted in your conscience The next thing for you have said as much as any man can in such a Cause it is pity you have not a better you say though it was a Tyrannical Court as it is called but such a Court it was and there were Officers you say it had figuram judicii that aggravates the fact to you to your profession There is a difference between a standing Court and that which is but named to be a Court this was but one of a day or two's growth before and you know by whom by some that pretended to be only the Commons your knowledge can tell you that there was never an Act made by the Commons assembled in Parliament alone and you may find it in my Lord Cook that an Act by the Lords and Commons alone was naught as appeared by the Records Sir James Ormond was attainted of Treason the Act was a private Act by the King and Commons alone the Lords were forgot when the Judges came to try it it was void and another in Henry the 6. time you know this was no Court at all you know by a printed Authority that where a settled Court a true Court if that Court meddle with that which is not in their cognizance it is purely void the Minister that obeys them is punishable if it be Treasonable matter it is Treason if murder it is murder so in the Case of Martialsea and in the Common Pleas if a man shall begin an Appeal of death which is of a criminal nature and ought to be in the Kings Bench if they proceed in it it is void if this Court should condemn the party convicted he be executed it is murder in the Executioner the Court had no power over such things you speak of a Court. First it was not a Court Secondly no Court whatsoever could have any power over a King in a coercive way as to his person The last thing that you have said for your self is this that admitting there was nothing to be construed of an Act or an Order yet there was a difference it was an Act de facto that you urged rightly upon the Statute of 11 Hen. 7. which was denied to some God forbid it should be denied you if a man serve the King in the War he shall not be punished let the fact be what it will King Henry the 7. took care for him that was King de facto that his Subjects might be encouraged to follow him to preserve them whatever the event of the King was Mr. Cook you say to have the equity of that Act that here was an authority de facto these persons had gotten the supream power and therefore what you did under them you do desire the equity of that Act for that clearly the intent and meaning of that Act is against you it was to preserve the King de facto how much more to preserve the King de jure he was owned by these men and you as King you charged him as King and he was sentenced as King That that King Henry the 7. did was to take care of the King de facto against the King de jure it was for a King and Kingly Government it was not for an Antimonarchical Government you proceeded against your own King and as your King called him in your charge Charles Stewart King of England I think there is no colour you should have any benefit of the Letter or of the
come to the matter Peters My Lord I cannot remember them Lord Ch. Baron Then I will remember you you are charged by this Indictment for compassing and imagining the death of the King and there is set forth sundry particulars to prove the overt act that you with other persons named in that Indictment did consult and meet together how to bring about the Kings death Then you are charged with several Acts of contriving and endeavouring the Kings death Overt acts that tend to the compassing or imagining the Kings death or any one of these to encourage the bringing on the King to his death the consulting or meeting together about it though you did not sit or sentence yet if you did any thing tending to that incouragement or otherwise abet it comfort or any wise ayd those trayterous persons that did it in the doing of it you are by law guilty of the whole fact the proposing and determining the King shall die though you were not he that actually put him to death yet notwithstanding if you did the other you are guilty of all if you shall speak any seditious speeches be they in the Pulpit or out of the Pulpit if you shall utter any thing that tends to sedition these are open acts which prove the imagination of the heart though imagination of the heart be Treason yet it cannot be proved but by open acts yet the imagination it self is Treason first you did conspire all the witnesses go along to prove this Dr. Young saith you came over from Ireland to his house and after five days that you were recovered of the Flux you staid there ten weeks you said your self there was enough if it were true to condemn you or any man I shall repeat it to you you told him a narrative that you came from New England from thence to Ireland and then you came to Holland with an intent to see how you might bring on the Kingdom to be a Commonwealth next he saith you spake very often against the King by way of disgrace against him and his family against the King and his off-spring this you said very often then you spake in vilification of Monarchical Government that this Commonwealth would never be at peace till 150. or three L's Lords Levites and Lawyers were taken away at which he replyed then they must be all Switzers Tinkers or Traytors he swears you were a Colonel and had a Commission that you would have had him accept of a Commission and that you had two Companies come from the West you told him the Parliament had an intent to secure Cromwel and your self but that you rid hard for it and then you confessed you agreed then upon his death to bring him to tryal and to cut off his head you did agree together and he believes it was your advice to Cromwel your answer was this that he was more violent than your self that he took upon him to be a spie and that he was no competent witness because he was under a temptation because you did not help him to his living and so conceived it to be malice you say he was used to take up such courses in his own Country the matter is not whether you had malice to the Kings life or Monarchy For the next one Gunter he swears that he was a Servant to Mr. Hildesly at the Star in Coleman-street and this was in 1648. he saith that many of the party of Cromwel did use to resort thither among the rest he saw you he said he came in to them and their discourse was about Charles Stewart and the Prisoner and did guess it was about the King that you were privy to it then he saih this was three daies before O. Cromwel went out of Town the effect of that is urged no further than this that you were so far of the Cabal that you were present with those persons Cromwel Ireton Rich and others you said I was there once with Mr. Nathaniel Fines Starkey he saith that at his Fathers house Ireton lay and was quartered there at Windsor before and when the King was Prisoner that you had your quarter there and Cromwel too in that Town The general meeting of the Councel of War was at his Fathers house there Ireton and his Wife lying there you came and resorted thither very often he saith then that it appeared that after the Councel of War had done many times Rich and you and Cromwel and Ireton were there together sometimes till two a clock in the morning he saith then that he did observe there was a fifth person he did not remember his name you sate up usually till two or three in the morning you had guards about you he saith further that Ireton being a Domestick he often discoursed with him and you came sometimes to be there too that there being some discourse concerning the King many times he did assert the Law concerning him that he was solutus legibus as to his person that you should say that it was an unequal law and that you did then discourse fully against the K. Government you said he was a Tyrant and not fit for that office that the office was useless chargeable and dangerous these very words he observed which afterwards were printed when they took away Monarchy He saith further that was their full and whole discourse he saith that his Father at Supper used to say that usual Grace God save the King Prince and Realm but afterwards that he heard the King was made a Prisoner that his Father altering the Grace he said God save his most Excellent Majesty and deliver him out of all his Enemies hands you rose up and said old Gentleman your Idol will not stand long That he did observe you often with them he saith further when Bacon was coming out and speaking some words concerning your frequent affronting the King you took up a staff and were ready to beat him and made an uproar it appears also of your being privy to Cromwels actions the next witness is Walkeley and he swears this against you that he was in the Painted Chamber the next day after the Proclamation was made and there he saw John Goodwin and You and there was an assembly and at the middle of the Table John Goodwin was and made a long speech or prayer that Cromwel would have had the people stay there but it was ordered they should be turned out at the end he saw you come out with the rest there it appeared you were in the consultation he saith he met the Army at St. James's and there when they were half past he saw the King in his Coach and there he saw Mr. Peters like Bishop Almoner riding immediately before the King and at St. James's Park he saw you marshalling the Souldiers that he was forced thereupon to go about he saith further that within a year or two after the Army was raised he heard you say these words If we can
Whitehall there were some Cavaliers then in the Regiment it was my fortune I came into your Company I wish I never had you commanded more besides my self to be a Witness against the King and Justice Cook took my Examination you brought me in you commanded the Guards that time at Whitehall when the King was upon his Tryal Axtell What more Burden And you commanded Elisha Axtell with a file of Souldiers to take a Boat and go down to the common Hangman that liv'd beyond the Tower to execute the King he is now Shepards Serjeant in Ireland Axtell My Lord I desire to ask him a question he was pleased to say I desired him to be a Witness Bur. Yes Axtell Where was it Burden In the Court at Whitehall Axtell My Lord I have seen the printed List of Witnesses against the King and in that list you shall find no such Name Burden I have been a Prisoner in Dublin by your means Axtell My Lord I hope you will take notice of that Councel Burden do you remember any of his commands to Web to draw up in the Banqueting-house Bur. He commanded Web to draw up in the Banqueting-house during the time of Execution his own company I was one of his own company then Coun. In order to what Bur. For Execution Axtell My Lord is Web here Bur. He is in Dublin Axt. I wish he were here Edward Cook sworn Cook And it please your Honour my Lord the last day of the Tryal of his Majesty I came into Westminster-hall coming where the Court was I did see Col. Axtell the Prisoner at the Bar there with some Musquetiers Coun. What day was this Cook The last day of his Majesties Tryal L. ch Bar. Go on Sir Cook Standing there a little while his Majesty came guarded with some Halberteers when he came by the Souldiers that stood with Col. Axtell his Majesty bowed and afterwards put off his Hat and went up to the Court I could not know what Bradshaw said to him I stood below I heard him say he was brought by the consent of the Commons and people of England there stood a Lady above in a Gallery crying out it is a lye where are the people or their consents Cromwel is a Traytor whereupon Col. Axtell standing by saith he what Drab is that that disturbs the Court come down or I will fetch you down Mr. Nelson sworn Coun. Tell my Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury touching the Discourse between you and the Prisoner at the Bar in Dublin Nelson My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury upon a Discourse with the prisoner at the Bar in Dublin 5 or 6 years since upon the platform in that Castle we discoursed of the late Kings having had several reports I desired to know of him who it was that Executed the King thinking he might inform me he was pleased to tell me this saith he the persons that were imployed in that service you know them as well as I do truly Sir not I said I I saw them in Vizards but not their Visage as I know of yes saith he you do know them it is true saith he my self and others were imployed in that affair in order to the Execution but there were several persons came and offered themselves out of a kind of Zeal to do the thing but we did not think it proper to imploy persons whom we did not know but we made choice of a couple of Stout persons pray let me hear their Names said I saith he it was Heulet and Walker I desired to know their reward Truly saith he I do not know whether 30 l. a piece or between them I said it was a small reward for a work of that Nature truly saith he that was all Axt. You named one man I did not hear the other named Nelson I named Heulet and Walker we was one that managed the Execution he told me so and it pleased you Sir Axtell He is pleased to say that in Ireland there was such conference was any body by Nelson No Sir Axt. Did I name any body to you Nel. You named those two persons Axt. Certainly I must invent them then for I had no more knowledg of them then any one here Nel. You told me you were one of them that had the managing of that Affair Councel My Lord we have done with our Evidence those particulars that were first opened to you have rendred the prisoner much a blacker person then we thought we leave him to his defence Axt. May it please your Lordships in the first place because I am ignorant in the Laws I desire to know upon what Statute this indictment is grounded L. ch B. It is grounded upon the statute of the 25th of Edward the Third Axt. My Lords I must acknowledg my ignorance of the Laws being a thing I never studied nor have the knowledg of but I have heard it is the duty of your Lordships and the Judges to be of Counsel for the Prisoner in things wherein he is ignorant in matters of law to make his just defence and therefore my Lord the Indictment it self being matter of law if your Lordships please not to grant me Counsel to speak to matrers of law I humbly pray that your Lordships will be pleased that for want of knowledg formalities punctilloes and niceties of the Law I might not undo my self I have heard by a learned Judg that though the Judg be of Counsel to the King yet by his Oath he is also to be Counsellor to the Prisoner and stands as a Mediator between the King and Prisoner and therefore my Lord I shall beg that humble favour that wherein I shall fall short to make the best improvement of my Plea in matter of law that your Lordships will help me and not take advantages against me as to the niceties formalities and punctilloes of the Law and my Lord this is a resemblance of that Great day where Christ will be Judg and will judg the secrets of all hearts and of all words and of all persons and by him all Actions are weighed knows all our hearts whether there be malice or how it stands in the frame of each heart before him in this place and therefore I hope there will be nothing by prejudging or any thing by precluding to be so black a person as it seemed to be said against me My Lords I must shorten the time and come to speak as to the Authority L. Ch. Bar. As to what Sir Axt. I speak as to the Authority by which or under which I acted I humbly conceive my Lord under favour that I am not within the compass of that Statute of the 25th of Edward the Third for that questionless must intend private persons Counselling Compassing or Imagining the death of the King But you know my Lords the War was first stated by the Lords and Commons the Parliament of England and by vertue of their Authority was forced to be raised and they pretended
business and to make people gaze upon you without any Ground Axt. I am upon my life I hope you will hear me patiently L. ch Bar. God forbid but we should Axt. I do desire to assert my Authority if any thing was done upon the House of Lords and Commons I do not come here to justifie their Actions I was not concerned in it My next Plea is this that if a House of Commons can be charged Guilty of High Treason as a community the distributive Body must needs be Guilty Court If there should have been 20 or 40 men come out of the House of Commons and should Murther a man they must answer for that it is not the community that can do such an Act of Treason these persons that you call a House of Commons there was but 26 of them and these must be the people this is the state of the case and when you have thrust out thrice the number of those remaining only those can serve your turn L. Annesly Mr. Axtell I am very sorry to see you in that place and it troubles me as much to hear you vent that for an Authority which you know your self was no Authority you would now for your defence for life and it is reason you should make as full a defence for life as you can you would shelter your self under that Authority which I am sorry I must say were one of the greatest Violators of you cannot forget how near a close of this bloody war by the mercy of God this Nation was when the Army interposed whose Trade it was to live by War when they had felt so much of the sweet of War they would not suffer the people to enjoy peace though the Lords and Representatives in Parliament had agreed to it A Treaty was begun terms of peace propounded and agreed to this you cannot forget and will have no need of Notes or Books to help your Memory when the people Groaned under the miseries of War and thirsted after Peace then came up the Army who were servants to the Parliament till that time taking upon them the Authority you cannot forget that your self was one of the number that came to offer accusations against the majority of the Commons House calling them Rotten Members the House of Lords was not then suffered to sit they would not joyn in that Ordinance that was preparing for the Tryal of the King when the Lords had refused they were no longer fit to be Lords neither then comes in a new Authority which we never heard of before a remnant of the House of Commons joyning with the Army that had driven away the greatest part of the House of Commons for in all Assemblies and Courts the major part must determine or no determination after this course was taken then is an Act set on foot they take upon them by Votes of their own to be the Parliament of England that the supreme power of the Nation is in the Representatives of the people who were they those few only that remained almost all the Cities Counties and Burroughs of England had none left to represent them they were driven away by Force then was this Act of Parliament such an Act as was never heard of before set on foot and passed as an Act by a few of the House of Commons if you can plead this for your defence this is the Act that you must shelter under But you know the Lords and Commons had Unanimously resolved for peace and so agree with the King if this Act will be any defence you may plead it to the full and this is all you have to say therefore go upon no Forreign matter Axt. If it please your Lordship that worthy Lord that spoke last is pleased to say that I was one of the persons that did accuse some of those Members of Parliament truly my Lord I never did come to the Commons Bar but once presenting a petition and for my hand either in charging any of the Members or Secluding any of them I never had any hand in that matter this is all to that part Next I Humbly conceive here I must ground my bottome and if I perish I perish by a Judgement in a Parliament My Commission that did Authorize me to obey my General was given me when the Lords and Commons sate in Parliament I had no other Commission then this my Lord Fairfax commanded the Army after the Kings Death by the like Commission I did but my duty in going to my Regiment the General saith go to such a place stay there if I refuse by the law of War I Dye if I obey I am in danger likewise I say my Commission was given me by the Lords and Commons and therefore I hope my Lord that what I have said and offered in that particular is not Truthless but of Weight Court The Effect of your Commission is only to make you an Officer Axtell My Commission bears date the 27th of March 1648. Ten months before the Kings Death we had no other Commissions therefore I humbly conceive the question will be this in point of law and I humbly desire it may be Truly and Fairly stated by your Lordship and these Honourable Jugdes that whether a man being guided by the Judgment of the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament and having declared their Judgments and Exposition of that Statute of the 25th of Edward the Third and Acting only by that Judgment of Parliament and under their Authority can be questioned for Treason That my Lord is a question that I do humbly think is a point in law and that you will please fairly and truly to state it whether I am within the compass of that Statute whereupon I am indicted Councel My Lord We do not charge him with any thing that he did Act under the colour of his Commission or with any thing he did before that but that which we charge him with are rhe Acts that he did at the Tryal of the King shew us your Commission from the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament for Tryal and Execution of the King you say something we do not charge him for any thing done by Vertue of that Commission but with those violent Acts that he did in encouraging the Souldiers to cry Justice Justice Execution Execution and all those other Violent Actions of his own malicious heart against the King We humbly beseech you he may answer to that which is the charge against him and that is the Compassing and Imagining the Death of the late King and his declaring that by those overt-acts that we have proved My Lords we desire that the Prisoner at the Bar may remember that he is not Indicted for levying War against the King if so then that Sir which you offer might be given as a Plea and we should have spoken to it but you are Indicted for Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King and that which we have given in Evidence
were the subsequent overtacts to prove the same Axtell I hope you will not think it much to give me some more freedom for my own defence for life My Lord I must needs say though there was a force on the Parliament I am not to justifie it I was no Lawyer no Statesman no Councellor but a Souldier and if the General who had a Commission from the Lords and Commons and that some years before and after the King's Death be not guilty of Treason what I did was by command from my General and though I am charged with being in Arms in Westminster-hall and at such and such a place yet it was not a Voluntary Act for I was bound to obey my General I do humbly pray that I may have your Lordships Judgment in this point I must say it was from the sense of their exposition of the Law and of the Statutes and from the Authority that every one took up Arms for and served them and obeyed either the one General or the other I say it was under this very Authority and this must needs acquit me from all the guilt that is laid upon me L. ch Bar. You put your self upon the Judgment of the Court upon this which you call a point in Law First it is manifest that there is no excuse at all for Treason no man by his Commission can warrant the doing of an Act which is Treason you must take notice of the Authority whether it be good or no your Commission was not to put the King to Death but on the contrary to preserve the Kings life The Lords and Commons what they did we do not meddle with the Reason and Ground of what they did was the preservation of the Kings Person as well as the maintenance of the Laws and Liberties of this Nation they made Protestations Declarations and Oaths for the preservation of the King's Person and you could not but take notice of those things Now whereas you go about to shroud your self under the Lord Fairfax he had no such Power and therefore you can challenge no more then he had and to what you say concerning the Judgment of the Parliament there will be a great deal of difference between a particular Case and a Declaration of Lords and Commons there is nothing you have said that hath any thing of Force and God forbid you should make use of it But I must tell you you could not but notoriously know all those Transactions that were in the Army what the Army had done that they came up with Swords in their Hands and turn'd out whom they would you saw what the Lords and Commons had done that the Treaty was ready for his Birth And then you come up with your Mermidons with Force and Arms and Exclude the greatest part of the Members and then the Lords were laid aside it is true the Lords were not wholly dissolved but they would not suffer them to Sit nor Act at all and this was apparent to the Nation If men under colour and pretence of such things Namely that a few persons for so they were but an Eighth part of the House of Commons permitted to remain and of that Eighth part which was but 46 in the whole there were but 26 that Voted that Act which you say you obeyed but you say you obeyed the General you were not to obey the General in this Case for the Facts that you have committed are not charged as Acts of War you are not charged for bringing the Souldiers in but for those Violent Actions that you were guilty of there you made the Souldiers cry out Justice Justice Execution Execution you sent officiously for a Hang-man to come down to you your Commission gave you no power for this the Death of the King you know how it was designed you know the Act for the bringing in of that Commission as they call'd it to sit in justice was after the House of Commons was reduced to a very small Number and some of those dissenting too what you did Act under that Authority if you can justifie it in the Name of God say so but do not Engage the Nation in those things which they abhorred and by the mercy of God are laid asleep Mr. Justice Foster You begin at the wrong End you ought as all men ought to do First to answer the matter of Fact and not to put in these long dilatory Pleas till you have answered the matter of Fact whether those things charged on you be true or not then if you have any thing further to say for your self by way of excuse it will be the time to speak and not before Axt. May it please your Lordships I humbly conceive I am upon that method to the first part of the witness they accuse me for commanding my Souldiers in Westminster-hall then I must prove my Authority which I have been about to do and declared the Judgment of Parliament L. ch B. The Court have heard you with a great deal of patience and that which is not at all to the business Axtell I only refer this as to the Authority I humbly conceive you will give me leave to insist upon this and how far I may improve it for my own defence here is the Commission by which my Lord Fairfax acted and that after the King's Death and I acted by the same Authority he did I had not been at Westminster-hall but on the command of the General Court Doth that Commission Authorize you to cry Justice Justice and to look up and down to get Witnesses against the King is that in your Commission Axt. I am to serve and obey all my Superior Officers that is my Commission if I do not I die by the Law of War Court You are to obey them in their just commands all unjust commands are invalid If our Superiors should command us to undue and irregular things much more if to the committing of Treason we are in each Case to make use of our passive not active Obedience Axt. Under Favour it is not proved that I did either Compass or Imagine the King's Death that is matter of Fact Court Let us try that Axt. My Lord I did nothing but as a meer Souldier I had Authority from the General I would leave this before your Lordships and the Jury that what I have done hath been by Authority of the Genetal L. Hollis Sir a word to you If you could satisfie the Court that you had received a Commission from the General to do those things with which you stand charged it were something then were it proper for you to plead it and the Court to judg Pray take this along with you the General gave you no such command what you are charged with in the Indictment is for Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King and that by such and such overt acts as making your Souldiers cry out Justice and Execution for being active and forward in sending for the
the contrary I leave it upon the consciences of the Jury to weigh it carefully how I could be guilty of Compassing or Imagining the Death of the King when nothing is charged against me to be either of Counsel Sentencing or Signing or to be at the Execution only one man as I told you before he spoke something wrathly and that he had suffered much and therefore he is come over now and saith I should send for the Executioner which I never knew of or had any hand in sending for how much validity that hath I leave to the Jury if it were so it is not treason for words may make a Heretick not a Traytor I speak that by way of preface I do humbly conceive that these being only noted words Execution and Justice the King not so much as named nor any thing done to it by me I say I conceive it doth not amount to Treason by the Law and besides it is against the Law of the great Judg the Judg of Judges all of us that are now and are to come shall stand before him to receive our deserts I say it is against the Law of God to make me an Offender for a word for a word I have heard the Judges say that the Laws of England are grounded upon the Laws of God and the Laws of England are Laws of mercy not of rigour My Lord if a man shall be destroyed in his Life in his Posterity for a word admit the thing had been so I leave upon the consciences of my Jury before the presence of Jesus Christ and before whom they and I must come to be rejudged again at the Tribunal and besides it is only words and words uncertain and Sir Edward Cook saith he must declare plain truth in matter of Treason nothing must be taken for Evidence that may be a presumption or inference or strain of wit I hope upon this consideration that the word Justice fixed upon me by two Witnesses may be taken up at second or third hand from the People or Souldiers by chastising them for the Tumult Then my Lord in the next place these words were never put in writing and so not Treason then my Lord there was never an overt act done by me for that Act of Indemnity that his Majesty and both Houses of Parliament passed wherein they were pleased the very last to except me I wonder'd when I came to be excepted of that number I do come back to the place where I left and that is the overt act My Lord I would only bring it in in this place when I was excepted by the House of Commons one of the twenty I was excepted thus not extending to life I went up and down free at noon day I did not hide my self ingaging a person that was one of his Majesties Servants to do me a courtesie he promised me he would do it and contrary to his promise he was pleased to bring the Kings Warrant to carry me to the Tower and after that I came to be excepted with that black Catalogue of excepted persons and to be brought to the Tryal of the Law Now my Lord I return to that overt act as it was but words uncertain and they may be words repeated from the third or the fourth hand for they were not put in writing according to that Act of Indemnity which I understand the meaning of to be thus That for their Execrable Treasons in Sentencing Signing or otherwise Instrumental they are excepted out of this Act and to be Tryed according to the Laws of this Nation I understand that to be Instrumental to be Instrumentally the Executioner of the King I never had any hand in that Upon the whole this is the Fact that is proved by two Witnesses they heard me say Justice and Execution which must relate to the Execution of Justice which by the Law of God is not Treason especially when there was not the word King for a word to take away and destroy so many my Life Wife Children and many Fatherless that are under the Charge of the Prisoner at the Bar is very sad the words I do not grant but upon such probabilities as I have said I might repeat them I will Justice you I will Execution you and then the words were not written I say as Sir Edw. Cook said they may make a Heretick but not a Traytor the other part of the Evidence is this that I was there with Souldiers at Westminster-Hall I must say if that be Treason to be guided by Judgment of Lords and Commons in Parliament I must say if that be Treason to take up Arms for a Parliament upon such Grounds and Expositions of the statute which they have made and published by their own Authority if I am Guilty under the General then the Parliament would be guilty of Treason L. Ch. Bar. That you have spoke to I am loath to interrupt you Axt. I thank your Lordships for informing me but I was commanded to be there by my General if I had not gone I must have dyed I did only stand there for preservation of the peace in no other sense if the General order me to be at such a Rendezvous I must be there if I disobeyed he would have condemned me by the Law of War The next thing against me material are these two things that is that I should send one Elisha Axtell for the Executioner I must say it is most Admirable such things should be laid to my charge I hope your Lordships and the Jury do observe he told you he suffered much and a poor man under his extremities and losses and sufferings perhaps might start some unadvised words and being now sent over may ascertain it But doubtless this Elisha Axtell being in Ireland if by command it had been so would have been sent over truly I must say I had no hand in the business it was left wholly to them amongst themselves and what ever was done or whatever was said it was said and done by them I never was acquainted with any thing of that nature he said he heard I should send Elisha Axtell for an Executioner if hearsays may be Treason it will be a hard Lesson and my Lord Sir Edw. Cooke saith there must be two witnesses here is but one It comes from such a man my Lord as the providence of God but I will say no more as to that but pray the Jury will take notice of it L. Ch. Bar. You need not doubt of it it shall be taken notice of this of Burden Axt. Now my Lord I have but two or three words more the Statute of the 25th of Edward the Third it doth intend private persons my Lord here is my Commission L. Ch. Bar. It is owned you had it from your General Axt. My Lord his Majesty is pleased to say in his Gracious Letter We do by these presents declare That we do grant a free and General Pardon to all our Subjects of
what degree or quality whatsoever who within Four days after the publishing hereof shall lay hold upon this our grace and favour excepting only such persons as shall hereafter be excepted by Parliament that is a Parliament called by his own Writ You know this Parliament L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Axtell I would not interrupt you to that but this very Objection was made by one of the Prisoners before this answer was given First the King's Declaration is not a Pardon in point of Law it must be under the Broad-Seal but God forbid but it should bind in honour You instanced in the word Parliament what was meant by the word Parliament you must know this the exigency of the Times were such that there were many Noble Persons that took the advantage to Assemble themselves together to reinstate the King they did that which was just and lawful according to the exigency of the Times This Declaration he sent to the two Houses he called them His Two Houses so that it appears clearly and manifestly they were then sitting they being accepted by the King and owned by Him and they did sit in way of Convention according as a Parliament and his Majesty sent his Letter to them and these are the persons that have thought fit to except you out of that Act. Axtell My Lord may I speak to that any further L. Ch. Car. If you do it will be over-ruled Axt. I submit with submission to the providence of God I did apply to Sir Harbottle Grimston for the Mercy and Favour of his Majesty according to his Declaration and here is Sir Harbottle's own hand for a Certificate L. Ch. Bar. That is allowed you that you did claim that benefit within the time but you may remember that it was referred to those two Houses of Parliament they were to consider who was fit for the Pardon and you are by them Excepted out by Name Your question now is no more but whether guilty or not guilty and these are but extravagant Discourses that you say otherwise and rather do you harm then good Axtell I hope you will pardon me my Lord I hope I have spoken to clear the Point The Fact charged by your Lordships and before the Jury and I hope the Lord will give the Jury a Memory of it and a right Understanding in what I have said for my own Defence My Lord the next thing I have to offer is this to Expound that Act of Parliament that it was the intention of his Majesty and Parliament that all should be excepted but those guilty of Councelling Signing or Sentencing Truly my Lord I humbly conceive I being none of those am not guilty of Treason I shall only speak one word to my Jury That they will remember what I have said that there is but two things two Witnesses as to Justice and Execution that it relates to no person but in General and then I do not own the things but possibly they might hear such words I taking of them up upon a rebound reproved the Souldiers for the other that I should send one for the Executioner he heard so and that I should name who was the Executioner I would not have that person or any other to suffer for that L. Ch. Bar. That is not at all pressed upon you not as to any Charge Axtell I thank your Lordship I am very ignorant L. Ch. Bar. Have you done Sir Axtell I leave the matter to the Jury in whose hands I and my little Ones and Family are left I only say this to you Remember your Ancestors Remember your Posterity I never heard it before that words were Treason In Queen Maries time Throckmorton was acquitted for words by the Jury Gentlemen of the Jury I leave my Case my Life my All in your Hands L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury There hath been several things offered by the Prisoner at the Bar as near as my Memory will give me leave in so long a Discourse I shall repeat all things which he saith for himself and which are said against him There are some things that he seems to utter as tending to matter of Law and something meerly of Fact proper only for you of the Jury For matter of Law he hath urged several things for himself not by way of justification of the Fact I must do him that right but in excuse of himself and I hope his conscience hath so wrought upon him that he is of opinion the Fact was a horrid Fact which was so indeed For that which he hath said for himself First he doth alledge to have his Commission from the Lord Fairfax My Lord Fairfax had his Commission from the two Houses of Parliament and this Gentlemans was in March the beginning of the year 1648. he saith what he did was in obedience to his superiors as a Soldier that he never consulted or advised about any thing of the Tryal or execution of his Majesty For this point it hath already been spoken to Gentlemen for that which hath been spoken to at large heretofore I must repeat it here that he may know it That no Person whatsoever no Community not the people either collectively or representatively have any coercive Power over the King neither the Lord Fairfax his General not he nor any other person could be excused for this horrid Fact of bringing the King to Trial No person as I said before nor Community have any such power The Law-books which he hath lately seen and truly he hath imployed his time well in that the Law-books tell us that whereas the two Spenceers had broached a damnable and detestable principle that the homage was only due to the King in respect to his Crown that if he did not demean himself according to such and such rules his Subjects might rule him per aspertee by asperity and sharpness but this was condemned by two Acts of Parliament they both appear in my L. Cooke in Calvins case I do not go to repeat all the evidence that might clear this truth I say had there been any such thing but it hath been told him there was no such thing in Fact My Lord Fairfax's Commission was for the preservation of the King as well as for the liberties of the People The 11. of Rich. 2. Robert de Vere and others for levying a War was punished but this Gent. was not charged for levying of War If either of the Houses of Parliament should command such a thing as tends to the death of the King it would be void in it self Something he let fall of the Parliament not being dissolved My Masters for that you have heard some of my Lords declare how and in what manner this was an Authority of Parliament but it was clearly nothing at all this Gentlemen goes by Vertue of a Power from the Lord Fairfax The next thing he urges in point of Law was this he comes by way of Dilemma saith he either I must obey my General or dye
speech among the Souldiers that Hulet cut off the Kings head L. Ch. B. How long before did you see Hulet upon the guard Burden The day before but not that day nor the day after L. Ch. B. William Hulet the evidence against you is twofold one concerning the cutting off the Kings head the other that you were in a frock If it be proved that you did not cut off the Kings head yet if you were in a frock in that place it will not excuse you if you have any thing to say I will be glad to hear it Hulet I desire the persons may be examined upon oath prisoners and others who was the person that did it I mean Hacker Huncks and Phayer L. Ch. B. You that are the prisoner for that which concerns Hacker and Phayer you know what conditions they are in one already tryed for his life the other a prisoner in the Tower and Hacker saith himself he doth not know the person at all you that are prisoner at the bar the Court conceives you have had time to get your witnesses here you were informed of the business before you came here yet notwithstanding it is conceived there are some here that can say something tending to the information of the Jury but they are not to be admitted upon Oath against the King Sheriffs Officer examined Sheriffs Officer My Lord all that I can say in this business is this one of our fellows that belongs to our Master the Sheriff John Rooten by name he and I were talking about this very story and he did acquaint me with this That he was in Rosemary-Lane a little after the Execution of the King drinking with the Hangman that he did urge him whether he did this fact God forgive me saith the Hangman I did it and I had forty half Crowns for my pains Abraham Smith examined Smith My Lord assoon as that fatal blow was given I was walking about White-hall down came a file of Musketeers the first word they said was this where be the Bargemen Answer was made here are none away they directed the Hangman into my Boat going into the Boat he gave one of the Souldiers a half Crown saith the Souldiers Waterman away with him be gone quickly but I fearing this Hangman had cut off the Kings Head I trembled that he should come into my Boat but dared not to examine him on shore for fear of the Souldiers so out I lanched and having got a little way in the water said I who the Devil have I got in my Boat says my fellow sayes he why I directed my speech to him saying are you the Hangman that cut off the Kings Head No as I am a sinner to God saith he not I he shook every joynt of him I knew not what to do I rowed away a little further and fell to a new examination of him when I had got him a little further tell me true said I are you the Hangman that hath cut off the Kings Head I cannot carry you said I no saith he I was fetcht with a troop of Horse and I was kept a close prisoner at White-Hall and truly I did not do it I was kept a close prisoner all the while but they had my instruments I said I would sink the boat if he would not tell me true but he denyed it with several protestations William Cox examined Cox When my Lord Capell Duke Hamilton and the Earl of Holland were beheaded in the Palace yard in Westminster My Lord Capell asked the Common Hangman said he did you cut off my masters head yes saith he where is the instrument that did it He then brought the Ax is this the same ax are you sure said my Lord Yes my Lord saith the Hangman I am very sure it is the same my Lord Capell took the Ax and kissed it and gave him five pieces of Gold I heard him say sirrah wert thou not affraid saith the Hangman they made me cut it off and I had thirty pound for my pains Richard Abell examined Abell My Lord in the house of one Mr. Bramston I did hear Gregory himself confess that he cut off the Kings head L. Ch. B. You that are the prisoner at the bar the Court is willing to give all full scope as far as may be to examine the truth of the fact as they would not condemn the innocent so they would not acquit the guilty do you desire further time to examine the truth of it before it be put upon the Jury H. I do confess I do not understand the Laws I desire I may have a little further time I desire the Jury may be withdrawn I desire a fortnights time but submit to the Court. A Stranger Examined Stranger My Lord I was with my Master in the company of Brandon the Hangman and My Master asked Brandon whether he cut off the Kings head or no He confessed in my presence that he was the man that did cut off the Kings head Lord Chief Baron You that are the Prisoner at the Bar the Court was willing to give you as much time as they could by Law The Jury hath been charged and evidence given all those Witnesses have been examined that we could hear of now for your advantage I will say something to you It was here said and given in Evidence that Axtell did send a Boat to fetch the common Hangman if we knew more that might tend to your advantage it should be repeated You Gentlemen of the Jury mark it There is first Gittens he swears that he was in the same Regiment that you were in twelve or thirteen years together he saith that he and others were called together upon their Oaths and you amongst the rest and there was an Oath of secrecy asking them if they would do such an Act they all refused to do it so did you but he said the day of Execution of the King this Gittens got among them and one Captain Web kept the door and he saw you fall before the King and ask the King forgiveness he said he heard your voice and so knew you and that the day after Captain Atkins said you shall see Hulet shortly come to preferment and he saith he did not see you in the Regiment that day and that Hewson and all the Regiment used to call you Father Gray-beard Stammers he saith that you was Capt. Lieutenant to Col. Hewsons Troop and you coming to Lutterels town you asked him several particulars whether he had been in the Kings Army walking up and down you said you were the man beheaded King Charles and for that you had one hundred pounds this he swears positively Samson Toogood he swears he saw you come to Col. Hewsons in 1650. you talked to him very familiarly when you were gone he asked who you were he told him you were a Captain Lieutenant of Horse and he said that you were a very mettled fellow and did the Kings business upon the Scaffold that
how to reconcile that which hath been said before with this that comes after I leave it to you I am totally at a loss When those times were how impetuous the Soldiers how not a man that durst either disown them or speak against them I was threatned with my very life by the threats of one that hath received his reward I was induced to it Certainly my Lord it doth argue that there was not malice predommant Love and Hatred cannot be at the same time in one person Design my Lord what should be my design a poor ordinary mean man Surely my Lord I could not design any great matters or places I knew my self unfit I humbly beg you would give me leave to tell you a little what I got Mr. Sol. Gen. By your favour my Lord the Prisoners at the Bar may say what they will by way of extenuation but we expect that when they enter upon these Discourses they will save your Lordships time and ours by a publick confession and evidence of sorrow We cannot spend so long time to hear these long Discourses we will rather prove it against every man singly Downes I will trouble you no further I do acknowledge all I humbly submit and beg your favour and leave my self eupon my Countrymen the Jury and beg the King's mercy specially Pray spare me one word that you would hear but a Witness or two unto that business Counsel He doth confess he sate and signed we beleive he is sorrowful and against his Conscience he did sign and that he did it out of a fear and from a threat that he was over-awed so was the Hangman too but after he had apprehended this sorrow and declared his Judgment upon the fact he signed the Warrant Downes My Lord I do humbly beg his Majesties mercy I came in upon the Proclamation Vincent Potter My Lord my condition requires ease for my Body he had a fit of the Stone upon him at that same time I pray that the passing the Sentence for execution may be suspended L. Ch. B. The Execution must be suspended for you are within that Qualification Potter I desire only this I am not in a condition to declare what I know and would speak I am mighty ful of pain if I am under that Qualification let me rest under that Counsel Do you confess the Indictment or will you put us to prove it Potter I am one that came in L. Ch. B. It is thus with you whether or no did you sit sign or act in this High Court of Justice against the King Potter I will deny nothing I confess the fact but did not contrive it I am full of pain Lord Chief Baron According to the demerit of the Case in Law you must receive Judgment here but no execution of that Judgment shall be until the King by advice and consent of Lords and Commons shall order the execution of it you are to be tried now Do you confess you signed the Warrant for execution of the King Potter I do confess it my Lord. Counsel We do accept it Potter I beseech you let me go to ease my self Lord Chief Baron Officer set a Chair for him which was done Mr Potter sit down Aug. Garland May it please your Lordship I came here this day intending to have waved my plea and referred my self to this honourable Court to be recommended to the Kings mercy and the Parliament But hearing of some scandal upâ—â— me more then ever I did hear till within these few dayes I shall desire your favour in hearing of my Trial. Mr. Sol. Gen. My Lord he saith well for if he had confessed the Indictment we should not have accepted it Call the Witnesses Garland I do confess this I sate and at the day of Sentence signed the Warrant for Execution Mr. Sol. Gen. And we will prove that he spat in the Kings face Gar. I pray let me hear that Otherwise I would not have put you to any trouble at all Clench sworn Counsel Do you know the prisoner at the Bar Augustine Garland Clench I know him very well Counsel Tell my Lords and the Jury how you saw him behave himself to our Sovereign Lord the King when he was at the Bar. Clench I was that day at Westminstar-hall when the King had sentence they hurried the King down this Mr. Garland came down stairs by them towards the bottome of the stairs he spit in his face at a little distance Couns Do you believe he did it on purpose upon your oath Clench I suppose he did it somewhat suspiciously in that way I did see the King put his hand in his left pocket but I do not know whether the king wiped it off Mr. Sol. Gen. The King wiped it off but he will never wipe it off so long as he lives He hath confessed that he sate that he sentenced and that he signed We say he contrived it at the beginning and at last bid defiance to the King I shall desire he may be remembred in another place Garland I do not know that I was near him at that time I do not remember this passage I am afraid he is an Indigent person If I was guilty of this inhumanity I desire no favour from God Almighty L. Ch. B. I will tell you this doth not at all concern the Jury but this Circumstance possibly may be considered in another place Gar. I refer my self whether you be satisfied that I did such an Inhumane act I submit that to you I dare appeal to all these Gentlemen here looking upon the prisoners or any other whether they ever heard of it nor I was never accused for such a thing till a few dayes since but I wave my plea and refer my self to the Court Now my Lord this is the truth of my Case there is that honorable Gentleman the Speaker of the House of Commons knows I lived in Essex in the beginning of these troubles and I was inforced to forsake my habitation I came from thence to London where I have behaved my self fairly in my way Afterwards in 1648 I was chosen a member into the Parliament in June 1648 I came in a Member of the Parliament My Lord after the division of the House by the insolency of the Soldiery some came to me and desired me that I would go to the House I was then at my Chamber at Lincolns-Inne I forbore a Week and more said I I do not expect to be admitted for they look upon me as another person said they If you will go you shall have no contradiction I went and went in when I was in the first business that came was the business of Tryal of the King and it was put on me to be Chair-man for bringing in this Act for Tryal I did not know how to contradict that power or authority be it what it will but I must obey I fear my ruine will follow it in that respect my Lord when I came there I
such a Priviledge that no man shall ever be called to account for any thing spoken in Parliament if he be not called to account by the House before any other Member be suffered to speak Lord Ch. Bar. That is the House will not determine but that doth not extend to your Case you are not charged here criminally for speaking those words that have been testified against you but for Compassing and Imagining the Kings death of which there are other Evidences and this but an Evidence to prove that Scot. My Lord I never did say these words with that aggravation which is put upon them I have a great deal of hard measure as to say I hope I shall never repent I take God to witness I have often because it was spoken well of by some and ill by others I have by prayers and tears often sought the Lord that if there were iniquity in it he would shew it me I do affirm I did not say so Mr. Baker My Lord I omitted something which was this I had occasion to speak with Mr. Scot whilest Richard's Parliament was sitting and among other discourse insisting upon some things that Richard had done saith he I have cut off one Tyrants head and I hope to cut off another Scot. My Lord This is but a single witness Mr. Soll. Gen. I suppose he meant Rich. for he was a Tyrant Lord Ch. Bar. Speak on Mr. Scot whatever you have to say Sc. If that he laid aside as an impertinency I have the less to say L. Ch. Bar. The next thing you have to do is to answer to the fact whether you did it or did it not Scot. I say this Whatever I did be it more or less I did it by he Command and Authority of a Parliamentary Power I did sit as one of the Judges of the King and that doth justifie me whatever the nature of the fact was Lo. Ch. Bar. We have had these things alledged before us again and again The Court are clearly satisfied in themselves that this act could not be done by any Parliamentary power whatsoever I must tell you what hath been delivered that there is no power on earth that hath any coercive power over the King neither single Persons nor a Community neither the people Collectively nor Representatively In the next place that which you offer to be done as by Authority of Parliament it was done by a few members of the House of Commons there were but 46 there at that time and of these 46 not above 26 that voted it at that time the House of Lords was sitting who had rejected it and without them there was no Parliament there was a force upon the Parliament there was excluded seven parts of eight Supposing you were a full House of Commons and that without exception there was not Authority enough and it is known to you no man better that there never was a House of Commons before this time that this foul Act was made for erecting that High Court of Justice as you call'd it assumed that Authority of making a Law you cannot pretend to act by Authority of Parliament and because you would excuse it you did it by Authority of Parliament whether it were good or no If a man do that which is unlawful by an unlawful Authority the assuming to do it by that Authority is an Aggravation not an Extenuation of the Fact It was over-ruled I think my Lords will tell you That they do not allow of that Authority at all either to be for Justification or Plea Scot. My Lords I humbly pray leave to say that without offence to the Court every person whereof I honour This Court hath not Cognizance to Declare whether it were a Parliament or no. Lo. Ch. Bar. That was objected too and we must aquaint you That first of all it is no Derogation to Parliaments That what is a Statute or not a Statute should be adjudged by the Common Laws We have often brought it into question whether such and such a thing was an Act of Parliament or not any man may pretend to an Authority of Parliament If forty men should meet at Shooters Hill as the Little Convention did at Westminster and say We do declare our selves a Parliament of England because they do so shall not this be judged what is a Statute and what not It is every days practise we do judge upon it the Fact is so known to every body they did assume to themselves a Royal Authority it hath been over-ruled already it hath been the mistake of many the vulgar acceptation of the word Parliament A Parliament consists of the King Lords and Commons it is not the House of Commons alone and so it is not by Authority of Parliament It is not unless it be by that Authority which makes up the Parliament You cannot give one instance That ever the House of Commons did assume the Kings Authority Scot. I can many where there was nothing but a House of Commons Court When was that Scot. In the Saxons time Court You say it was in the Saxons time you do not come to any time within 600 years you speak of those times wherein things were obscure Scot. I know not but that it might be as lawful for them to make Laws as this late Parliament being called by the Keepers of the Liberties of England My Lords I have no seditious design but to submit to the providence of God Court This is notorious to every man This we have already heard and over-ruled L. Finch That that I hope is this That Mr. Scot will contradict that which he hath said before that is That he hopes he should not repent I hope he doth desire to repent Mr. Scot for this we must over-rule it as we have done before there is nothing at all to be pleaded to the Jurisdiction and this point hath been determined before Scot. The Parliament informer times consisted not so much of King Lords and Commons but King and Parliament In the beginning of the Parliament in 1641. the Bishops were one of the three Estates if it be not properly to be called a Parliament a legislative Power though it be not a Parliament it is binding If two Estates may take away the third if the second do not continue to execuâ—â— their trust he that is in occupancy may have a title to the whole I do affirm I have a Parliamentary Authority a legislative power to justifie me Lo. Ch. Bar. Mr. Scot what you speak concerning the Lords Spiritual is nothing to your Case be it either one way of other it was done by an Act of Parliament with consent of the King Lords and Commons though you will bring it down to make these Commons have a legislative Power I told you it was over-ruled before We have suffered you to expatiate into that which was a thing not intended by many of my Lords that you should have any such power to expatiate into that which is
that blessed be God the house is purged and the Lords will be shortly pull'd out and the twenty eighth day of January which was the day after the King was sentenced at Saint James's his Chappel you took for your Text the 149. Psalm the 6 7 8 and 9 verses whereof these words were part To bind their Kings in chains and their Nobles with fetters of iron there in the middle of that Sermon having spoken before of the King you said you did intend to preach before the poor wretch upon the 14 of Isaiah the 18 19 and 20 verses speaking of all the Kings of the nations Thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch c. he saith further you said look upon your lesser Bibles and you will find the title is The Tyrants fall There is another witness that is one Bowdler a few days before the Kings death at S. Sepulchres there you fell upon the old comparison all along you compared the King to Barabbas and that a great many would have Christ crucified and Barabbas released all along comparing the King to Barabbas One more and that was Ryder he heard this text He shall call his name Emanuel you fell to speak of news what shall become of the King and you said the King was Barabbas and a great many would rather have Christ crucified than Barabbas And then Mr. Walker he saith that after the King was first brought to his tryal he heard you say this I have prayed and preached this twenty years and now may I say with old Simeon Lord now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace for mine eyes have seen thy salvation he mentions that you made use of the other comparison of the Major and the Bishops man and inferred from thence that the King and Prince c. were not excepted out of the Scripture where it is said Whosoever sheds mans blood c. you have heard all this witnessed against you what have you to say for your self Peters These are but single witnesses Lord Chief Baron The statute is two witnesses for Treason but not two to one individual thing though there are several witnesses have proved the same thing about Barabbas and our Saviour Bind their Kings with chains c. and of your other actions there is a whole Jury of witnesses two witnesses expresly we agreed upon the Kings death and we resolved to set the King aside Pet. I do not know the witnesses Lord Chief Baron One is Sir Jeremy Whitchcot the other is Doctor Young you shall do well if you have any thing to say to invalid these witnesses to speak to it else the Jury will be sent together to deliver up their verdict Peters My Lord if I had time and opportunity I could take off many of the witnesses but because their testimony is without control I cannot satisfie my self I have no skill in the Law else I might have spoke for my self I do not know what to say more unless I had more time and counsel Mr. Soll. Gen. If the prisoner can say no more here is this in it here are five places where he did consult about the Kings death at Windsor at Ware in Colemanstreet in the Painted Chamber and in Bradshaws house and four witnesses to prove this there are two witnesses to his comparison of the K. and Barabbas and two witnesses to his text of binding their K. inchains c. proof that he hath been in action in New-Eng that he came from it with that intent and then went to Holland that he had been in arms that he called the day of his Majesties tryal a glorious day resembling the judging of the world by Saints he prays for this in the Painted Chamber preaches for it at Whitehall S. James's Chapel Sepulchres what man could more contrive the death of the King than this miserable Priest hath done the honour of the Pulpit is to be vindicated and the death of this man will preach better than his life did it may be a means to convert many a miserable person whom the preaching of this person hath seduced for many come here and say they did it in the fear of the Lord and now you see who taught them and I hope you will make an example of this carnal prophet The Jury went together and after a little consultation settled in their places Cl. Are you agreed in your Verdict Jury Yes Cl. Who shall say for you Jury Our foreman Cl. How say you is the prisoner at the Bar guilty of the Treason whereof he stands indicted or not guilty Foreman Guilty Cl. And so you say all Jury Yes Cl. Look to him Keeper Coun. We desire Mr. Cook may be brought to the Bar and that they may both have their judgement pronounced Cl. John Cook hold up thy hand what hast thou to say why the Court should not pronounce judgement for thee to dye according to Law Cook I have a few words matter of Law First there is no averment in the Indictment that J. Cook mentioned in the Act of Indempnity is the same with the John Cook mentioned in the Indictment and that I am the John Cook mentioned in both L. Ch. Bar. This will not help you in this case you have owned and have pleaded by the name of John Cook Cook The second is this that the overt acts should be particularly expressed in the Indictment L. Ch. Bar. This cannot be alledged in arrest of judgement the Jury have found you guilty of compassing and imagining the death of the King by the statute of 25 Edw. 3. and this cannot help you Cook I say it was professionately L. Ch. B. That hath been overruled already we have delivered our opinions the profession of a Lawyer will not excuse them or any of them from Treason and this hath been overruled and is overruled again Cook I humbly conceive that the remaining part of the House of Commons were to be Judges whether there was a force or not L. Ch. B. This is all past and overruled Cook Then I have no more Cl. Hugh Peters Hold up thy hand what hast thou to say for thy self why Judgement should not pass against thee to die according to law Peters I will submit my self to God and if I have spoken any thing against the Gospel of Christ I am heartily sorry Silence Commanded L. Ch. Bar. You are both persons of that ingenuous and liberal education as I hope I shall not need to tell you what it is to die you have had a great a deal of time to think of it you could not but think of this issue of your doings long ago and therefore I shall spare my labour of telling you what it is to die and of that eternity that you are to enter into only give me leave in a few words in relation to both of your professions to say something to shew the nature and hainousness of this offence the murther of the King if you were not
by law that the right of the Militia was in them and your Lordships will remember in several Declarations and Acts that was mutually exchanged between his Majesty and Parliament and my Lord that was the Authority the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament raised a Force and made the Earl of Essex Ceneral and after him the Earl of Manchester of the Eastern Association and after that Sir Tho. Fairfax Lord General of the Forces by this Authority I acted and this Authority I humbly conceive to be legal because this Parliament was called by the Kings Writ chosen by the People and passed a Bill they should not be dissolved without their own consents that the Parliament was in being when the Tryal was and a question whether yet legally Dissolved In the fourth place they were not only owned and obeyed at home but abroad to be the chief Authority of the Nation and also owned by Foreign States and Kingdoms sent Ambassadors to that purpose under them did all the Judges of the Land Act who ought to be the Eye of the Land and the very light of the People to Guide them in their right Actions and I remember the Judges upon Tryal I have read it of High Treason Judg Thorp Nicholas and Jermin have declared it publickly That it was a lawful justifiable thing by the Law of the Land to obey the Parliament of England My Lord it further appears as to their Authority over the People of this Nation petitioning them as the supreme and lawful Authority and My Lords as I have heard it hath been objected that the Houses of Lords and Commons could make no Act. Truly my Lord if you will not allow them to be Acts though they intitle them so call them so and obeyed as so by the Judges Ministers and Officers of State and by all other persons in the Nation yet I hope they cannot be denied to be Orders of Parliament and were they no more but Orders yet were they sufficient as I humbly couceive to bear out such as acted thereby And my Lord the Parliament thus constituted and having made their Generals he by their Authority did constitute and appoint me to be an Inferior Officer in the Army serving them in the quarters of the Parliament and under and within their power and what I have done my Lord it hath been done only as a Souldier deriving my power from the General he had his power from the Fountain to wit the Lords and Commons and my Lord this being done as hath been said by several that I was there and had command at Westminster-Hall truly my Lord if the Parliament command the General and the General the inferiour Officers I am bound by my Commission according to the Laws and Customs of War to be where the Regiment is I came not thither voluntarily but by command of the General who had a Commission as I said before from the Parliament I was no Counsellor no Contriver I was no Parliament-man none of the Judges none that Sentenced Signed none that had any hand in the Execution onely that which is charged is that I was an Officer in the Army if that be so great a crime I conceive I am no more guilty than the Earl of Essex Fairfax or the Lord of Manchester Judg Mallet You are not charged as you were an Officer of the Army Axtell My Lords That is the main thing they do insist upon my Lord I am no more guilty than his Excellency the Lord General Monck who Acted by the same Authority and all the People in the three Nations and my Lord I do humbly suppose if the Authority had been only an Authority in Fact and not Right yet those that Acted under them ought not to be questioned but if the Authority commanded whatsoever offence they committed especially that that guided me was no less than the declared Judgment of the Lords and Commons sitting in Parliament they declared that was their right as to the Militia and having explained several Statutes of Henry the 7th wherein the King having enterchanged Declarations with the Parliament the Parliament comes to make an Explanation on that Statute and my Lord it is in Folio 280. wherein they do positively expound it and declare it as their allowed Judgment To clear up all scruples to all that should take up Arms for them saith the Parliament there as to the Statute of 11. of Henry the 7th Chapter the first which is printed at large comes there to explain it in general and comes here Folio 281. and gives this Judgment It is not say they agreeable to Reason or Conscience that any ones duty should be known if the Judgment of the High Court of Parliament be not a Rule or Guide to them In the next place this is the next Guidance Rule and Judgment of Parliament upon the Exposition of this Statute and as they have said in several places was it not too much to take up your Lordships time they are the proper Judges and Expounders of the Laws The High Court of Parliament have taken upon them to expound the Law and said that we Lawyers will give the meaning of the Text contrary to what they have expounded the meaning under their hands in the same Declaration his Majesty is pleased to quit that Statute upon which I stand Indicted the 25th of Edward the Third where they do my Lord expound that very Statute in the Declaration made in 1643. Folio 722. I come to the declared Judgment wherein they did positively say that the persons that do Act under their Authority ought not to be questioned as persons Guilty Folio 727. that is the Exposition that the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament doth make upon the statute Councel My Lord this is an Argumentation of Discourse in justification of his proceedings we desire to know what he will answer as to the Plea Axtell My Lords I have this further to say that if a House of Commons Assembled in Parliament may be Guilty of Treason for the truth is if I Acted Treason that Acted under the Authority of the Lords and Commons in Parliament and of the Commons in Parliament then doubtless they must begin the Treason if the House of Commons who are the collective body and Representation of the Nation all the people of England who chose them are guilty too and then where will there be a Jury to try this concerning the Commons alone I have been over ruled L. ch Bar. If you have any thing to say to the Lords and Commons answer to your charge your charge is nothing of the Lords and Commons but what you Acted when the house was broke and Forced Coun. You cannot but know that there is nothing charged against you for which you can so much as pretend an Authority of the Lords and Commons you know before you could do this Horrid Murther you were the persons that destroyed the Lords and Commons both indeed you Ravel in a