Book of Knox of the Monstrous Government of Women 6. And John Leisley Bishop of Ross in Scotland confuteth the first point 1 That the Statute that beareth the inheritance of Aliens made 25 Edw. 3. is only to be understood of particular men's inheritance 2 There is express exception of the King's Children and Off-spring in the Statute 3 The Practice both before and since the Conquest to the contrary 7. The second If Henry 8. made such a Testament it could not hold in Law But that he made it not besides many probabilities the testimonies of the Lord Paget Sir Edw. Montague Lord Chief Justice and William Clark who set the King's stamp to the Writing avowed before the Council and Parlament in Queen Maries time That the testament was signed after the King was past sens and memory 8. Robert Heghington Secretary to the Earle of North writeth in favor of the King of Spain as next Heir to the House of Lancaster Another writeth in the behalf of the Dukes of Parma as next Heir of Portugal another for the Infanta of Spain as the Heir of Brittanie CAP. II. Of the Succession of the Crown from the Conquest unto Edward the Third's time The issue of VVilliam the Conquerer WILLIAM the Conqueror had four Sons and five Daughters Sons 1. Robert Duke of Normandie 2. Richard died in his youth 3. William Rufus 4. Henry the first Daughters 1. Sicilie a Nun 2. Constantia wife of Alain Fergant Duke of Britanie 3 Adela or Alice wife of Stephen Earle of Bloys c. The other two died yong Robert Duke of Normandie Robert of Normandie and his Son William were ruined by Henry 1. Robert pined away in the Castle of Cardiff William slain before Alost in Flanders whereof he was Earl by an arrow Henry 1. Of all the Children of Henry 1. Mande first married to Henry 5. Emperor had issue Henry 2. by Geoffrey Plantagenet Duke of Anjou c. her second Husband he Reigned after King Stephen The beginning of the House of Britanie Constantia the Conquerors second Daughter had issue Conan 2. le Gros who had issue Hoel and Bettha wife of Eudo Earle of Porrhet in Normandie her Father made her his Heir on his death bed disadvowing Howel she had issue Conan 3. He Constantia wife to Geoffrey third Son to Henry 2. by whom she had Arthur whom King John his Uncle put from the Crown of England and murthered After which Constantia married Guy Vicount of Touars a Britan and their issue have continued till this in the infanta of Spain and the Dutchess of Savoy her sister whose Mother was sister unto the last King of France Anna the Heir of Britanie had by Lewis the 12. of France one Daughter Claudia of whom and Francis the first came Henry 2. whose Daughter was Mother to the Infanta c. King Stephen Adela or Alice the Conquerors third Daughter had issue Stephen Earle of Bouloyne chosen King after Henry 1. before Mande his Daughter because a Woman and before her Son Henry 2. because he was but a Child and a degree further off from the Conqueros but especially by force and friends whereby he prevented also the Duke of Britain Son to his Mothers eldest sister He had two sons who left no issue and Mary wife to the Earle of Flanders whose right if any is discended to the Spaniard Henry 2. his Sons Henry 2. had issue by Eleonora the Heir of Aquitaine William who died yong Henry Crowned in his Fathers time and died without issue 3. Richard Coeur de Lyon who died without issue 4. Geoffrey who married Constance the Heir of Britain as aforesaid 5. John the King who had issue Henry the third Henry 2. his Daughters His Daughters were 1. Eleonora married to Alphonso 9. of Castile 2. to Alexis the Emperor 3. to the Duke of Saxonie 4. to the Earle of Tholouse Eleonora had Henry of Castile who died without issue and Blanche married to Lewis of France of the Race of Valois whose issue continueth and Berenguela married to the Prince of Leon whose Son Ferdinando by the death of his Uncle Henry without issue was chosen King of Castile before Saint Lewis the son of Blanche aforesaid because a stranger 16. The right which France had to Aquitain Poictiers and Normandie came to them by the aforesaid Blanche who was married thither on condition to have for her dower all that John had lost in France which was almost all hee had Henry 3. his Issue Henry 3. had Edward 1 hee Edw. 2. hee Edw. 3. and Edmund Crook-back Earl or Duke of Lancaster whose heir Lady Blanch married John of Gant the third son of Edw. 3. from whom came the hous of Lancaster Also Beatrix married to John 2. Duke of Britain from whom descended the Infantas Mother That Edward Crook-back was not elder then Edward 1. Edward Crook-back was not Edw. 1. elder brother and put by onely for his deformitie 2. hee was born 18 Junii 1245 and Edward 16 Junii 1239. Matth. West who lived at the same time 2. hee was a wise Prince and much imploied by his father and brother in their wars 3. his father advanced him in England and would have made him King of Naples and Sicilie 4. having the charge of the Realm at his father's death and his brother absent hee attempted no innovation nor hee nor any of his children made any claim to the Crown after that 5. If hee had been elder the title of Lancaster in John of Gant his Issue whose mother was heir unto Edmund had been without contradiction nor could the house of York have had any pretence of right The Issue of Edward Crook-back Henry the second Earl of Lancaster and grand-childe to the aforesaid Edmund was created Duke of Lancaster by Edward 3. Hee had but one childe the Ladie Blanch wife of John of Gant by whom hee became also Duke of Lancaster His three sisters were matched one to the Lord Maubery of whom the Howards of Norfolk Joane 2. Mary married to the Earl of Northumberland from whom the now-Earl 3. Eleonor married to the Earl of Arundel of whom the late Earle descended CAP. III. The Succession from Edward 3. The houses of Lancaster and York Edward 3. his Issue EDward the third had five sons 1. the Black Prince hee Richard second in whom his line ceased 2 Lionel Duke of Clarence 3. John of Gant Duke of Lancaster by his wife Blanche 4 Edward of Langley Duke of York 5. Thomas of Woodstock Duke of Glocester The Title of the Hous of York Lionel of Clarence had one onely daughter and heir Philippe married to Edmund Mortimer Earl of March they Roger hee Anne Mortimer married to Richard Earl of Cambridg second son of Edmund L. of York His son Richard by the death of his Uncle slain at Agincourt came to bee Duke of York his father of Cambridg beeing executed for a Conspiracie against Henry 5. And was the first of the
heads For which cause the States of Venice and Genoa which were wont to have simply this Government of Aristocratia were inforced in the end to chuse Dukes The Division and Factions among the Senators of Carthage was the cause why Aid was not sent to Hannibal their Captain in Italie after his so great and important Victorie at Canna which was the very cause of the saving of the Romane Empire and the loss of their own As also afterwards the Emulations and Discord of the Romane Senators in the Affairs and Contentions of Marius and Sylla and of Pompey and Caesar was the occasion of all their Destruction and of their Common-wealth with them Why Helps are given to Kings Therefore it appeareth that of all other Governments Monarchie is the best But for that a King is a Man as others be and thereby not only subject to Errors in Judgment but also to passionate Affections in his Will It was necessarie That the Common-wealth should assign him the best Helps that might be for Directing and Rectifying both his Will and Judgment Lawes the first Help why given The first Help is the Law which Aristotle saith Est mens quaedam nullo perturbata affectu and in the same place addeth That he which joyneth a Law to Govern with the Prince joyneth God to the Prince but he that joyneth to the Prince his Affection to Govern joyneth a Beast So that a Prince Ruling by Law is more than a man or a man Deified and a Prince Ruling by Affections is less than a man or a man Brutified In another place also the same Philosopher saith That a Prince that Ruleth hemself and others by his own Appetite and Affections of all Creatures is the worst and of all Beasts is the most furious and dangerous for that nothing is so outragious as Injustice armed and no Armor is so strong as Wit and Authority Councils the second Help why given The Monarchie of ENGLAND tempered The second Help that Common-wealths do assign to their Kings and Princes be certain Councils as we see the Parlament of England and France the Courts in Spain and Diets in Germanie without which no matter of great Moment can be concluded And besides this commonly every King hath his Privie Council whom he is bound to hear and this was done to temper somwhat the absolute Form of a Monarchie whose danger is by reason of his sole Authoritie to fall into Tyrannie as Aristotle noteth In the Monarchie of England all the Three Forms of Government do enter more or less In that there is one King or Queen it is a Monarchie In that it hath certain Councils which must be heard it participateth of Aristocratia And in that the Commonaltie have their Voices and Burgesses in Parlament it taketh part also of Democratia All which limitations come from the Common-wealth as having Authoritie above their Princes for the good of the Realm Restraint of Kings among the Romans Why Kinglie Government left in Rome This Restraint hath been in all Times and Countries as for example The Romans that began with Kings gave their Kings as great and absolute Authoritie as ours have now adaies but yet their next in Blood Succeeded them not of necessitie but new Kings were Chosen partlie by the Senate and partlie by the People So as of Three * most excellent Kings that ensued immediatelie after Romulus none were of the Blood nor yet Romans born but rather Strangers Chosen for their Virtue and Valor So for the neglecting of their Laws the Senators slew Romulus their first King and cut him in pieces and for the same reason expelled Tarquinius Superbus their last and all his Posteritie and with them the Name and Government of Kings which was changed in the Regiment of Consuls Restraint of Kings among the Grecians In Greece and namely among the Lacedemonians their Kings Authoritie was so restrained by certain Officers of the People called Ephori which commonly were five in number as they were not only chastened by them but also Deprived and somtimes put to death Restraint of Kings in Christendom In Germanie The Emperor can neither make War nor exact any Contribution of men or Money thereunto but by the free leave and Consent of all the States of the Germane Dyet or Parlament And for his Children or next in Kinn they have no action interest or pretence to Succeed but only by free Election if they shall be thought worthie Nay one of the chiefest Points that the Emperor must Swear at his entrance is this That he shall never go about to make the Dignitie of the Emperor Peculiar or Hereditarie to his Familie but leave it unto the Seven Electors free in their power to Chuse his Successor according to the Law made by the Pope Gregory the Fift and the Emperor Charles the Fourth in this behalf In Polonia and Bohemia The Kings of Polonia and Bohemia can neither do any thing of great Moment without the consent of certain principal men called Palatines or Castellans neither may their Children of next Blood Succeed except they be Chosen as in the Empire In Spain France and England In Spain France and England the Privileges of Kings are far more eminent both in the Power and Succession for their Authoritie is much more absolute and their next in Blood do ordinarily Succeed for as touching Authoritie it seemeth that the Kings of France and Spain have greater than the King of England for that everie Ordination of these Two Kings is Law in it self without further Approbation of the Common-wealth which holdeth not in England where no general Law can be made without Consent of Parlament But in the other Point of Succession the restraint is far greater in those other Two Countries than in England For in Spain the next in Blood cannot Succeed be he never so lawfully Discended but by a new Approbation of the Nobilitie Bishops and States of the Realm as it is expresly set down in the Two ancient Councils of Toledo the Fourth and Fifth Nor can the King of Spain's own Son at this day be called Prince except he be first Sworn by the said Nobilitie and Estates as we have seen it practiced in the King Philip's Children In France Women neither any of their Issue though Male are admitted to Succeed in the Crown And therefore was Edward 3d. of England though Son and Heir unto a Daughter of France which was left by her Three Brethren Sole Heir to King Phillip * the fair her Father put by the Crown As also was the King of Navar at the same time Son and Heir unto this Womans eldest Brothers Daughter named Lewis Huttin notwithstanding all their allegations And Philip de Valois a Brothers Son of Philip the fair's preferred to it by General Decree of the States of France and by Verdict of the whole Parlament of Paris And albeit the Law Salica
to Odo for recompence the State of Aquitaine with title of a Duke Ralph 1. in the place of Charles the simple This Charles through his simplicitie beeing allured to go to the Castle of Peronne in Picardie was made there prisoner and forced to resign his Kingdom unto Ralph King of Burgundie And his Queen Algina or Ogen daughter of King Edward the elder of England fled with her little son Lewis that shee had by him into England unto her Uncle K. Adelstan And Charles through miserie died soon after in the said Castle of Peronne Lewis d'Outremer son to Charles the Simple established But this Ralph dying also three years after the States of France called out of England Lewis therefore named d'Outremor and crowned him And hee was a good King and reigned 27 years Hugh Capet to the prejudice of Charles of Lorrayne Louys d'Outremer left two sons Lothaire who succeeded him and Charles whom hee made Duke of Lorrayne Lothaire had a son named Louys who was King after him but died without issue And so the crown was to have gon by succession to his Uncle Charles Notwithstanding the States of France for mislike they had of his person did put him by and chose * Hugo Capetus Earl of Paris who by approbation of the Common-wealth was crowned and his race endureth until this day Hugh Capet his title not by usurpation And all the French Chronicles do justifie this title of Hugo Capetus against Charles Nangis an ancient and diligent writer of the Abbey of S. Denis defendeth it in these words Wee may not grant in any case that Hugh Capet may bee esteemed an Invador or Usurper of the Crown of France seeing the Lords Prelates Princes and Governors of the Realm did call him to this dignitie and chose him for their King and Sovereign Lord Upon which words Belforest saith For in very truth wee cannot by any other means defend the title of Hugh Capet from usurpation and felonie then to justifie his coming to the Crown by the consent and will of the Common-wealth A speech used by the Ambassador sent from the States of France to Charles of Lorrayne after his exclusion Here is to bee noted somwhat out of the speech which the Ambassador sent by the States of France after their election of Hugh Capet to Charles of Lorrayne did use unto him as followeth Every man knoweth Lord Charles that the Succession of the Crown and Realm of France according to the ordinarie Laws and Rights of the same belongeth unto you and not unto Hugh Capet now our King but yet the very same Laws which do give unto you this right of Succession do judg you also unworthie of the same for that you have not endeavored hitherto to frame your life and manners according to the prescript of those Laws nor according to the use and custom of your Countrey of France but rather have allied your self with the Germane Nation our old enemies and have acquainted your self with their vile and base manners Wherefore seeing you have forsaken and abandoned the ancient virtue sweetness and amitie of the French wee have also abandoned and left you and have chosen Hugh Capet for our king and have put you back and this without any scruple or prejudice of our consciences at all esteeming it far better and more just to live under Hugh Capet the present possessor of the Crown with enjoying the antient use of our Laws Customs Privileges and Liberties than under you the inheritor by nearness of blood in oppression strange customs and crueltie For even as those which are to make a voiage in a ship upon a dangerous sea do not so much repent whether the Pilot which is to guide the stern bee owner of the ship or no but rather whether hee bee skilful valiant and like to bring them in safetie to their way's end or to drown them among the waves even so our principal care is that wee have a good Prince to lead and guide us happily in the way of Civil and politick life which is the end why Princes were appointed For that this man is fitter to bee our King And so Charles was excluded and the Frenchmen thought themselvs secure in conscience for doing the same which God also hath seemed to confirm with the succession and happie success of so many noble and most Christian Kings as have issued out of this Line of Hugo Capetus unto this day Examples of the Third Rank Henry 1. to the prejudice of his elder Brother Robert In this Third Line Robert Hugh Capet his son who succeeded him had two sons Robert and Henry whereof the younger was admitted and Robert put back partly becaus hee was but a simple man in respect of Henry and partly for that Henry was greatly favored and assisted in this pretence by Robert Duke of Normandie Lewis 6. like to bee dis-inherited for the hatred of his father K. Philip 1. When Philip 1. son to this Henry was deceased the people of France were so offended with his evil life and Government as that his son Louis le Gros was like to bee dis-inherited for his sake if som of his partie had not caused him to bee crowned in hast and out of order at Orleans for preventing the matter Charles 8. for his father Lewis xi So the State of France had once determined to put back Charles afterwards the Eight from his succession for the hatred they bare to his father Lewis the XI if the said father had not died while the other was very young Examples of England Divers changes of Races in England For England it hath had as great varietie and changes in the race of their Kings as any Realm in the world For first after the Britains it had the Romans of whose and their own blood they had Kings again of their own After this they had them of the Saxon and English blood and after them of the Danes and then of the Normans and after them again of the French and last of all it seemeth to have returned to the Britains again in K. Henry 7. for that his father came of that race Examples before the Conquest Egbert 1. before his nearer in blood To pass over the ancient ranks of the British Roman and Saxon races until Egbert King of the West-Saxons and almost of the rest of England besides who therefore is said to bee properly the first monarch of the Saxon blood and first commanded that Realm to bee called England as ever since hath been observed this man Egbert beeing for his prowess in jealousie to his King Britricus was by him banished into France where he lived a Captain under the famous King Pepin till that Britricus dying hee returned into England where though hee were not the next by propinquitie of blood yet as Polydor saieth omnium consensu Rex creatur and proved the most excellent King that ever before the Saxons had Adelstan
by virtue whereof the French-men pretend to exclude the Succession of Women be no very ancient Law as the French themselves do confess and much less made by Pharamond their first King yet do we see that it is sufficient to bind all Princes and Subjects of that Realm to observe the same and to alter the Course of Natural Discent and that the King of Navar only by virtue therof doth at this day pretend to be the next in Succession to this goodlie Crown and to exclude both the Infanta of Spain and the Prince of Lorrayn that now is who are Children of the last King's Sisters Propinquitie of Blood not Sufficient By which we see That it is not enough for a man to allege bare Propinquitie of Blood thereby to prevail for that he may be excluded or put back by divers other circumstances and for sundry other reasons Kings lawfully Possessed may be Deprived Yea The Common-wealth hath not only the Authoritie to put back the next Inheritors upon just Considerations but also to Dispossess them that have been lawfully put in Possession if they keep not the Laws As by examples of all Nations it might be proved And God for the most part hath wonderfully prospered the same Titles of Princes once Settled not to be Examined by private men Not that it be lawful to Subjects for every mislike to band against their Princes Nay if a Prince be once settled in the Crown and admitted by the Common-wealth every man is bound to settle his Conscience to obey the same * without examination of his Title or Interest because God disposeth of Kingdoms and worketh his will in Princes affairs Yielding too much to Princes bringeth a Tyrannie But to make Princes subject to no Law or limitation at all and to free them from all Obligation unto the whole Bodie whereof they are the Heads as though they had been created Kings from the beginning of the world or as though the Common-wealth had been made for them and not they for the Common-wealth were to bring all to such absolute Tyrannie as no Realm ever did or could suffer among civil People The mean which is to be kept The Argument of the next Chapter So as all Dutie Reverence Love and Obedience is to be yielded to the Prince which the Common-wealth hath once established So yet retaineth still the Common-wealth her Authoritie not only to restrain him if he be exorbitant but also to chasten and remove him upon due and weightie considerations And hath the same been done and practiced at manie times in most Nations with right good success to the weal-publick Of Kings lawfully Chastised by their Common-wealths for their Misgovernment And of the good and prosperous success that God commonly hath given to the same CAP. III. EXAMPLES The Ordination of God in the Common-wealth of the Jews doth authorise the same doings in other Common-wealths FOr Examples out of the Scripture though some man may chance to say That the things recounted there of the Jews were not so much to be reputed for Acts of the Common-wealth as for particular Ordinances of God himself yet it doth make rather for than against this purpose because other Common-wealths may the sooner practice that wherein they have God his own authoritie and approbation Examples out of the Jews SAUL First then Saul though he was elected by God to that Royal Throne yet was he by his order slain by the Philistians for his disobedience and not fulfilling the Laws and limits prescribed unto him And David was chosen in his room which proved such a King as he was a most perfect patern for all Kings to follow and so lived and so died as never Prince I think before him nor perhaps after him so joyned together both Valor and Virtue Courage and Humilitie Wisdom and Pietie Government and Devotion Nobilitie and Religion AMON Amon was lawful King also and that by natural Discent and Succession for he was Son and Heir to King Manasses yet he was slain by his own people quia non ambulavit in via Domini and Josias was brought in his room of whom it is written Fecit quod erat rectum in conspectu Domini non declinavit neque ad dextram neque ad sinistram Examples of the Romans ROMULUS Romulus the first King of the Romans as hath been said before having by little and little declined into Tyrannie was slain and cut in pieces by the Senators and in his place was chosen Numa Pompilius the notablest King that ever they had who prescribed all their Order of Religion and manner of Sacrifices imitating therein the Ceremonies of the Jews as Tertullian and others do note began the building of the Capitol and added the two Months of January and February to the year TARQUINIUS SUPERBUS The expulsion of Tarquinius Superbus their seventh and last King for his evil Government and the alteration thereby of the whole Government by the establishing of Consuls had so prosperous a success that whereas at the end of their King's Government they had but fifteen miles Territory without the Citie it is known that when their Consuls Government ended and was changed by Julius Caesar their Territory reached more than fifteen thousand miles in compass JULIUS CAESAR When Julius Caesar upon particular ambition had broken all Law both Humane and Divine and taken all Government into his own hands alone he was in revenge thereof slain as the world knoweth by Senators in the Senate-house and Octavianus Augustus preferred in his room who proved afterwards the most famous Emperor that ever was NERO. After Nero 6th Emperor which succeeded lawfully his Uncle Claudius and was afterward deposed and sentenced * to death by the Senate for his wicked Government albeit Peace ensued not presently yet within few months the whole Empire fell upon Vespasian and his Son Titus two of the best Governors that those times ever saw DOMITIAN To cruel Domitian whose death the Senate is thought in secret to have procured being not able to perform it openly by Justice for that he did presently by publick Decree allow of the same disanulled all his barbarous acts and pulled down every where his Arms and Memories did succeed five excellent good Emperors to wit Nerva whom the Senate chose in his room Trajan Adrian Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius HELIOGABALUS Heliogabalus for his most beastlie life and foul actions was deprived and put to death by the Souldiers of Rome at the request and publick Approbation of the Senate and People who Ordained in his detestation That never Emperor after him should be called more Antoninus and so it was observed and preferred to the Empire in his room his Cousen named Alexander Severus who proved one of the most rarest Princes for his Valor and Virtue that ever the Romane Empire hath had MAXENTIUS Maxentius was drowned in the River of Tiber and he sirnamed afterward Constantine
either for Valor Prowess length of Reign acts of Chivalrie or the multitude of famous Princes his Children left behind him was one of the noblest Kings that ever England had RICHARD 2d Richard the 2d Son to the black Prince of Wales for having suffered himself to be misled by evil Counsellers to the great hurt and disquietness of the Realm was deposed also after 22. years reign by a Parliament holden at London the year 1399. and condemned to perpetual Prison in the Castle of Pomfret where he was soon after put to death and in his place was by free Election chosen the noble Knight Henry * Duke of Lancaster who proved afterwards so notable a King as the world knoweth HENRY 6th Henry 6th after almost 40. years reign was deposed imprisoned and put to death also together with his Son the Prince of Wales by Edward 4th of the House of York And this was confirmed by the * Commons and afterwards also by publick Act of Parliament because the said Henry did suffer himself to be over-ruled by the Queen his Wife and had broken the Articles of Agreement made by the Parlament between him and the Duke of York and solemnly sworn on both sides the 8th of Octob. 1459. though otherwise for his particular life he were a good man and King Edward 4th was put in place who was one of the renownedest for Martial Acts and Justice that hath worn the English Crown RICHARD 3d. This man having left two Sons his Brother Richard Duke of Glocester put them to death and being the next Heir Male was authorised in the Crown but Deposed again afterwards by the Common-wealth which called out of France Henry Earle of Richmond who took from him both life and Kingdom in the Field and was King himself by the name of Henry 7. And no man I suppose will say but that he was lawfully King also which yet cannot be except the other might lawfully be deposed If the said Deprivations were unjust the now Pretences are unlawful Moreover is to be noted in all these Mutations what good hath succeeded therein to the Common-wealth which was unjust and is void at this day if the Changes and Deprivations of the former Princes could not be made and consequently none of these that do pretend the Crown of England at this day can have any Title at all for that from those men they discend who were put in place of the deprived If Kings established may be Deprived much sooner Pretenders And if this might be so in Kings lawfully set in Possession then much more hath the said Common-wealth power and authoritie to alter the succession of such as do pretend Dignitie if there be due reason and causes to the same Wherein consisteth principally the lawfulness of Proceedings against Princes which in the former Chapter is mentioned What interest Princes have in their Subjects Goods or Lives How Oaths do Binde or may be Broken by Subjests towards Princes And finally the difference between a good King and a Tyrant CAP. IV. 1. Objection against the Assertions in the last Chapter BUt although by Nature the Common-wealth hath authoritie over the Prince to chuse and appoint him at the beginning yet having once made him and given up all their authoritie unto him he is no more subject to their correction but remaineth absolute of himself As every particular man hath authorised to make his Master or Prince of his inferior but not afterwards to put him down again howsoever he beareth himself towards him 2. Objection When the Children of Israël being under the Government of the High Priest demanded a King of Samuel he protesting unto them Well quoth he you will have a King hearken then to this that I will say Hoc erit jus Regis qui imperaturus est vobis He shall take away from you your Children both Sons and Daughters your Fields and Vineyards c. and shall give them to his servants and you shall cry unto God in that day from the face of this your King and God shall not hear you for that you have demanded a King to Govern over you Assertions of Bellay Yea Bellay and some other that wrote in flatterie of Princes in these our days do not only affirm That Princes are lawless and subject to no accompt or correction whatsoever they do But also That all goods chattels possessions and whatsoever else commodities temporal of the Common wealth are properly the Kings and that their Subjects have only the use thereof so as when the King will he may take it from them by right Answer to Bellay his First Assertion But for the first That Kings are subject to no Law Is against the very Institution of a Common-wealth which is to live together in Justice and Order for if it holdeth so insteed of Kings and Governors to defend us we may set up publick murtherers ravishers theeves and spoylers to devour us Then were all those Kings before mentioned both of the Jewes Gentiles and Christians unlawfully deprived and their Successors unlawfully put up in their places and consequentlie all Princes living at this day are intruders and no lawful Princes Answer to Bellay his Second Assertion Of the second saying also That all temporalities are properly the Princes and that Subjects have only the use thereof no less absurdities do follow First it is against the very first principle and foundation of the Civil Law which at the first entrance maketh this division of Goods That some are common by Nature to all men as the Aër the Sea c. Others are publick to all of one Citie or Countrie but yet not common to all in general as Rivers Ports c. Some are of the Communitie of a Citie or Common-wealth but yet not common to every particular person of that Citie as common Rents Theaters the publick hous and the like Some are of none nor properly of any man's Goods as Churches and Sacred things And some are proper to particular men as those which every man possesseth of his own Besides it overthroweth the whole nature of a Common-wealth maketh all Subject to be but very slaves for that slaves and bondmen in this do differ from freemen that slaves have only the use of things without property or interest and cannot acquire or get to themselves any dominion or true right in any thing but it accreweth all to their Master Lastly If all Goods be properly the King's why was Achab and Jezabel so reprehended and punished by God for taking away Naboth's vineyard Why do the Kings of England France and Spain ask Money of their Subjects in Parlament and that termed by the names of Subsidies Helps Benevolences Loans Prests Contributions c How have the Parlament oftentimes denied them the same Why are there Judges appointed for matter of Suits and Pleas between the Prince and the People Why doth the Canon Law inhibit all
Princes upon pain of Excommunication to impose new Impositions upon their People without great necessitie and free Consent of the givers Nay why be all Princes at this day prohibited to alienate any thing of their own Crown without consent of their People if they be Lords of all and the People have interest in nothing Answer to the Allegations out of the Prophet SAMUEL Touching the words of Samuel they are not to allow or authorise Injustice or Wickedness in any King But to threaten the Jews with the disorders of Kings for that they rejected the moderate Government of their High Priests and had demanded as a matter of more Pomp and Glorie to be ruled by Kings as other Heathen Nations about them were which did suffer great extortions and tyrannies of their said Kings For the principal points recorded to all Princes throughout the whole course of Scripture are Diligere Judicium Justitiam apprehendere Disciplinam facere veritatem And for not observing them many Princes have been punished by God himself By what Law Princes are punished Now to know by what Law the Common-wealths do punish their Kings It is by all Law both Divine and Humane Divine for that God doth approve that form conditions and limitations which every Common-wealth doth chuse unto it self Humane for that all Law both natural national and positive doth teach us That Princes are subject to Law and Order And it is not so of a Common-wealth as it is of a private man because a private man's voice being but one doth not make the Prince wholly as the Common-wealth doth Besides having once given his voice to make his Prince he remaineth subject and inferior to the same But the whole Bodie superior who giving his authoritie up to the Prince doth not deprive her self of it but may use it when need shall require for his own defence for which he gave it Where one of the Contractants breaketh the other is no more bound And then that power which the Prince hath from the Common-wealth is in very truth but potestas vicaria or delegata given with such restrictions cautels conditions and oaths on both parts the Prince and the Common-wealth as if the same be not kept on either part the other is not bound to observe his promise neither And this is among the very rules of both the Civil and Canon Law Frustrà fidem sibi quis postulat servari ab eo cui fidem à se praestitam servare recusat And again Non abstringitur quis juramento ad implendum quod juravit si ab aliâ parte non impletur cujus respectu praebuit juramentum In things evil promised Oath bindeth not Moreover where the fulfilling of our Oath doth contain any notable hurt or inconvenience against Religion Pietie Justice Honestie or the Weal-publick or against the partie himself to whom it was made it is both lawful honest and convenient to leave the performance thereof As for example In that Herod commanded St. John Baptists head to be cut off which he did for his Oaths sake to the Daughter of Herodias no man will deny but that the thing had been far better left unperformed and the Oath better broken than fulfilled according to another rule of the Law In malis promissis fidem non expedit observari Two principal Cases when Oaths hold not towards a Prince So in these two Cases Subjects Oaths may be left unperformed towards the Prince First when the Prince observeth not at all his promise made to the Common-wealth at his admission And then when the performing of their oath should turn to the notable damage of the Weal-publick These Two Cases touched in the Deprivation of Childerick of France These Two Cases were touched in the Deposition of Childerick when the Bishop of Woitsburg in the Name of all the Nobilitie and Common-wealth of France made this Speech to Zacharie the Pope Truth it is that the French have sworn Fidelitie to Childerick as to their natural King but yet with Condition that he on his part should also perform the Points that are incident to his Office as to defend the Common-wealth protect the Church of Christ c. which if he doth the French are ready to continue their obedience and allegiance unto him But if he be apt for none of these things and nothing else may be expected whilest he is King but detriment to the State ignominie to the Nation danger to Christian Religion and destruction to the Weal-publick Then it is lawful for you no doubt most holy Father to deliver the French from this band of their Oath c. The difference between a King and a Tyrant When a King declineth once from his Dutie he becometh a Tyrant And as a good King's end and Office is to make happie his Common-wealth so the Butt of a Tyrant is to destroy the same A King ruleth according to equitie oath conscience justice and law prescribed unto him and a Tyrant is enemy to all these conditions Vt populo Magistratus ità Magistratui praesunt leges saith Cicero Theodosius and Valentinianus two worthie Emperors Digna vox est said they Majestate Regnantis legibus se alligatum fateri But the Tyrant Caligula is justly detested who said Memento mihi omnia in omnes licere And the Emperor Trajan certainly is to be immortally commended who delivering the Sword to a Praetor or Governor in Rome Take this Sword said he and if I do reign justly use it for me and if not then use it against me Which in effect and substance are the same words that our Christian Princes use at this day at their enterance when they promise to rule justly and according to the Laws of their Country and upon that Condition take the Oaths of their Subjects Obedience Protesting That if they perform not this that then their Subjects are free as before from all Allegeance Of the Coronation of Princes and manner of their Admission to their Authoritie and the Oaths which they do make in the same unto the Common-wealth for their good Government CAP. V. Since the People made the Prince it is likely he did it with Conditions for his own good FOrasmuch as not Nature but the Election and Consent of the People hath made the first Princes from the beginning of the world It appeareth most certain and conform to all reason That they were not admitted to that Power and Dignity without some Conditions and Promises also on their parts for using it well because it is not likely that any people would ever put their lives goods and liberties in the hands of another without some assurance of justice and equity And hereof came to pass that both the Romans and Greecians prescribed to their Kings those limits before mentioned More Religiously observed among Christians than other Nations And the more orderly the Prince cometh to his Crown the more express and
certain are their Conditions between him and the People As on the other side the more violent he getteth his authority as those ancient Tyrants of Assyria Nemrod and Belus did and at this day is done among the Turks the less Conditions of just dealing may be expected Therefore among the Christians this point of Mutual Oaths between Prince and Subjects hath been much more established made clear and reduced to a more sacred and Religious kinde of Union than before for that the whole action hath been done by Bishops and Prelats and the astipulation on both sides hath passed and been Regestred in sacred places and with great solemnitie of Religious Ceremonies The manner of Admitting Greek Emperors Anastatius The East or Greek Emperors of Constantinople after the Empire was translated from Rome thither by Constantine the great first Christian Emperor though their coming to the Crown were nothing so orderly as at this day it is used yet they were wont above a thousand years agone to have an Oath exacted at their hands by the Patriarch of Constantinople As of Anastatius the first writeth Zonaras Antequam coronaretur inquit fidei confessionem scriptam quâ polliceatur se in dogmatibus Ecclesiasticis nihil esse novaturum ab eo exegit Patriarcha Euphemius vir Sanctus Orthodoxus And divers other Conditions also did he promise before he could be Crowned as the taking away of some Tributes the giving of Offices without Money and other like points appertainting to reformation and good government Michaël Of Michael the first writeth the same Author in these words Michaël ubi diluxit magnam Ecclesiam ingressus à Patriarcha Nicephoro Imperatorio diademate est ornatus postulato priùs scripto quo promitteret se nulla Ecclesiae instituta violaturum neque Christianorum sanguine manus contaminaturum The Latine Emperors Otho 1. In the West Empire given to Charles the great and his posteritie this Point is yet more settled and more inviolably kept For albeit it went by succession for the most part at the beginning yet were they never admitted to the same without this circumstance of swearing to Conditions of righteous Government As Otho 1. who being Son and Heir to Emperor Henry 1. Duke of Saxonie sirnamed the Faulkner and named by him to the inheritance of the said Crown of Germanie did nevertheless make his Oath and received his new approbation of the People for the Archbishop of Moguntia chief Primate of all Germanie bringing him to the Altar where he must swear said these words unto the people Behold I bring you here Otho chosen by God and appointed out by his Father Henry our Lord and now made King by all the Princes of this Empire if this Election please you do you signifie the same by holding up your hands to heaven Which being done he thereupon tooke the Ornaments and Ensigns of the Empire and put them upon the Emperor telling him the signification of each thing and what it did binde him unto and taking his promise to perform all And after all includeth the storie Rex perfusus oleo Sancto coronatur Diademate aureo ab Episcopis ab eisdem ad solium Regale ducitur in eo collocatur Institution and manner of the Emperor's Creation used at this day In the year 996. Pope Grerory 5. in a Synod holden in Rome did by the consent of Otho 3. Emperor and Nephew unto this other Otho appoint this form of Election for the time to come of the Germane Emperors That he should be chosen by six Princes of Germanie Three Ecclesiastical which are the Archbishops of Moguntia Colen and Trevires and Three Temporal to wit the Duke of Saxonie the Count Palatine of the Rhene and the Marquess of Brandeburge and when these six voices should happen to be equally divided that then the Duke of Bohemia for then it was no Kingdom should have place also to determine the Election which was approved by all the Princes of Germanie and other Christian Princes and Estates of the world And Sleydan writeth the manner and conditions of the said Election to be these First of all that after any man is chosen Emperor he is to be called only Caesar and the King of the Romans and not Emperor until he be Crowned and presently after his Election he sweareth these Conditions To defend the Christian and Catholick Religion to defend the Pope and Church of Rome whose Advocate he is to minister justice equally to all to follow peace to keep all Laws rights and priviledges of the Empire not to alienate or engage the Possessions of the Empire to condemne no man without hearing his Cause but to suffer the course of law to have his place In all and whatsoever he shall do otherwise that it be void and of no validitie at all Whereunto he sweareth first by his Legates and then giveth a coppie of his Oath in writing to every one of the six Electors and after this goeth to the Citie of Aquis-gran to be Crowned in the great Church where about the middle of the Mass the Archbishop of Colen goeth unto him in the presence of all the People and asketh Whether he be ready to swear and promise to observe the Catholick Religion defend the Church minister justice protect the Widdows and Fatherless and yield dutiful honor and obedience to the Pope of Rome Whereunto he answering That he is ready to do all this the Archbishop leadeth him to the high Altar where he sweareth in express all these Articles which being done the said Archbishop turning himself to the Princes of the Empire and People there present doth ask them Whether they be content to swear Obedience and Fealtie unto him who answering Yea he is anointed by the said Archbishop before the Altar and then do come the other two Archbishops of Moguntia and Treveris and lead him into the Vesterie where certain Deacons apparel him in his robes and do set him in a Chair upon whom the Archbishop of Colen saith certain Prayers and then delivereth him a Sword drawn and putteth a Ring upon his finger and giveth him a Scepter in his hand and then all the three Archbishops together do put on the Crown upon his head and leading him so Crowned and Apparelled unto the high Altar again he sweareth the second time That he will do the part of a good Christian and Catholick Emperor Which being ended he is brought back and placed in the Imperial Seat and Throne where all the Princes of the Empire do swear Obedience and Faith unto him beginning with the Electors and so to all the rest in order And it is to be marked That the Emperor sweareth three times once by his Deputies and twice by himself before his subjects swear once unto him The manner used in Polonia In Polonia which being first a Dukedom was made a Kingdom about the year 1000 the manner of the Coronation of their
Kings is in substance the same as that of the Emperor for the Archbishop of Guesna Metropolitan of all Polonia declareth to the King before the high Altar the End and Condition of his Office and Dignitie unto what Points he must Swear and what do signifie the Sword the Ring the Scepter and the Crown And the King's Oath thereupon being taken the Marshal General of the whole Kingdom doth ask with a loud voice of all the Nobilitie and People there present Whether they be content to submit themselves unto this King or no Who answering Yea the Archbishop doth end the residue of the Ceremonies and doth place him in the Royal Throne where all his Subjects do Homage unto him The manner used in Spain before the entring of the Moors Sisinandus When Spain remained yet one General Monarchie under the Gothes before the entring of the Moors Sissinandus who had expelled King Suintila for his cruel Government in the Fourth National Council of Toledo holden the year 633. prayed with submission the Prelats there gathered together to determine that which should be needful for the maintaining both of Religion and State and so after matters of Religion they first confirm the Deposition of King Suintila together with his Wife Brother and Children and then authorise the Title of Sissinandus but yet with this insinuation We do require you that are our present King and all other our Princes that shall follow hereafter with the humilitie which is meek and moderate towards your Subjects and that you Govern your People in Justice and Pietie and that none of you do give sentence alone against any man in case of Life and Death but with the consent of your publick Council and with those that be Governors in matters of Judgment And against all Kings that are to come we do promulgate this sentence That if any of them shall against the reverence of our Laws exercise cruel Authoritie with proud domination and Kinglie pomp following only their own concupisence in wickedness that they are condemned by Christ with the sentence of Excommunication and have their separation both from him and us to everlasting judgment Chintilla Sissinandus being dead one Chintilla was made King in his place under whom were gathered two other Councils the 5th and 6th of Toledo in which matters were determined about the Succession to the Crown Safetie of the Prince Provision for his Children Friends Officers and Favorites after his death against such as without the approbation of the Common-wealth did aspire to the same And among other Points a severe Decree was made in the 6th Council concerning the King's Oath at his admission That he should not be placed in the Royal seat until among other Conditions he had promised by the Sacrament of an Oath That he would suffer no man to break the Catholick Faith c. After the entring of the Moors Don Pelago After the coming in of the Moors one Don Pelago a yong Prince of the Royal Blood of the Gothes being fled among the rest to the Mountains was found and made King and having began the recovery of Spain by the getting of Leön left a certain Law written in the Gotish tongue touching the manner of making their King in Spain and how he must Swear to their Liberties and Priviledges whereof the first Article saith Before all things it is established for a Law Libertie and Priviledge of Spain That the King is to be placed by Voices and Consent perpetually and this to the intent no evil King may enter without consent of the People seeing they are to give to him that which with their blood and labors they have gained of the Moors For the fashion of making their Kings in that old time it remaineth still in substance at this day but the manner thereof is somwhat altered for now the Spanish Kings be not Crowned but have another Ceremonie for their admission equal to Coronation which is performed by the Archbishop of Toledo Primate of all Spain Manner used in France Two Manners thereof In France have been two manners used of that Action the one more antient hath endured 600. years from Clodoveus that was Christned and Anointed also and Crowned at Rheims by S. Remigius unto the time of Henry 1. and Philip 1. his Son before the 12. Peers of France were appointed to assist the Coronation which now is the chiefest part of that Solemnitie In the old fashion as saith du Haillan the Kings were lifted up and carried about upon a Target by the chief Subjects there present according to the manner of the Spaniards But for the substance of the admission it was not much different from that which is now The Old Manner Philip 1. For example the Coronation of Philip 1. Henry 1. his father desiring for his old age to establish him in the Crown before his death did ask the consent and approbation both generally and in particular of the Nobility and People for his admission Whom finding all willing he brought him to Rheims where in the great Church the Mass being began upon the reading of the Epistle the Archbishop turning about the Prince declared unto him what was the Catholick Faith and asked him Whether he did beleeve it and would defend it against all persons who affirming that he would his Oath was brought unto him whereunto he must Swear which he took and holding his hands between the hands of the Archbishop read it with a loud voice and signed it with his own hand The substance of the Oath was That he would preserve unto the Clergie all Canonical priviledges and all Law and Justice unto them as every King was bound to do and furthermore administer Justice unto all People given him in charge Then the Archbishop taking his Cross after he had shewed unto all the audience the authoritie that the Archbishop of Rheims had to anoint and Crown the King of France and asked license of King Henry the Father Il esleut Philippe son fili pour en Roy de France Which the Popes Legats and the Nobility and People did approve crying out three times Nous l'approvvons nous le voalons soit fait nôtre Roy Institution of the newest Manner This Manner was altered specially by * Louysle Jeune who leaving still the substance of the action added thereunto divers external Ceremonies of Honor and Majestie and amongst other ordeined the offices of Twelve Peers of France Six Ecclesiastical and Six Temporal who ever since have had the chiefest Places and Offices in this great action First THe Archbishop and Duke of Rheims anointeth and Crowneth the King The Bishop and Duke of Laon beareth the Glass of Sacred Oyl The Bishop and Duke of Langres the Cross The Bishop and Earle of Beauvais the Mantle Royal. The Bishop and Earle of Koyon the King's Girdle The Bishop and Earle of Chaalons the Ring The Duke of Burgundie Dean of
the Order holdeth the Crown The Duke of Gasconie and Guyenne the First Banner quartered The Duke of Normandie the Second Banner quartered The Earle of Tholosa the Golden Spurs The Earle of Champanie the Banner Royal or Standard of War The Earle of Flanders the Sword Royal. And this day the King is apparrelled three times and in several sorts 1. As a Priest 2. As a King and a Warrier 3. As a Judge Philip 2d This day Lewis specially for the Coronation of his Son Philip Agustus whom he caused also to be Crowned in his dayes In this Coronation whereunto Henry 2. of England as Duke of Normandie who held the Crown and one of his Sons as Duke of Gasconie were present the King being summoned by the Archbishop to keep all Priviledges of the Church Law and Justice answered I do promise and avow to every one of you and to every Church to you committed That I will keep and maintain all Canonical priviledges law and justice due to every man to the uttermost of my power and by God's help shall defend you as a good King is bound to do in his Realm And then laying his hands upon the Gospel made his Oath in these words Au nom de Jesus Christ re jure promets au peuple Chrestien à moy Subject ces choses c. First that all my subjects be kept in the union of the Church and I will defend them from all excess rapine extortion and iniquitie Secondly I will take order that in all judgments justice shall be kept with equitie and mercie to the end that God of his mercy may conserve unto me with yo◠my people his holy grace and mercie Thirdly I shall endeavor as much as possibly shall lie in me To chase and drive out of my Realm and all my Dominions all such as the Church hath or shall declare for Hereticks as God shall help me and his holy Gospels Then he kissed the Gospels and after Te Deum sung and other particular Prayers said by the Archbishop he was Vested and the Ring Scepter Crown c. were put upon him with declaration what they signified After all that the Archbishop and Bishops did bless him and then by the said Archbishop and the other Peers was led unto the Seat Royal where the Crown was put upon his head c. France Author of this manner of Coronation Albeit the substance of the Ceremonie of Sacring and Anointing Kings be much elder than the Christian Kingdom of France yet is this particular and Majestical manner of doing it by way of Coronation the most antient in France above all other Kingdoms round about And it is probable that most of them have taken their forms of anointing and Crowning from her for the affinitie and likeness of the one to the other as may be seen by that of Germanie and Polonia before recited by that of Navarra brought in by certain Earles of Champanie according to the use of France and others But among all England seemeth to have taken it most particularly from them not only for that divers English Kings have come out of France but also for that in very deed the thing it self is all one in both Nations The Manner of Admission in England First As the Archbishop of Rheims doth this Ceremony in France so in England the Archbishop of Canterbury And the first thing the said Archbishop requireth at the King's hands is about Religion Church matters and the Clergie whereupon the King sweareth and giveth up his Oath in writing which he laieth down with his own hands upon the Altar the words are these That he will during his life have reverence and honor unto almightie God and to his Catholick Church and unto his Ministers and that he will administer Law and Justice equally to all and take away all unjust Laws Which after he hath sworn the Archbishop turning about to the People declareth what the King hath promised and asketh Whether they be content to submit themselves unto this man as unto their King or no under the Conditions proposed Whereunto having yielded he put's upon him the Royal Ornaments as the Sword the Ring the Scepter and Crown and namely he giveth him the Scepter of St. Edward the Confessor and then addeth this exhortation Stand and hold thy place and Keep thy Oath with a great commination on the behalf of almightie God if he taketh the place and breaketh his Oath Henry 4th In the admission of Henry 4. the People were demanded thrice Whether they were content to admit him for their King And the Archbishop of Canterbury having read unto them what this new King was bound by Oath unto he took the Ring wherewith to wedd him to the Common-wealth which wedding importeth a mutual Obligation which was shewed to the People by the High Constable and then put upon the King's finger who kissed the Constable in sign of acceptance c. Edward 4th Edw. 6th Mary Elisab In the admission of Edward 4th the Peoples Consent was asked at two several times very solemnly notwithstanding that he had proved his Title by Succession before in Parliament And in the Coronation of Edward 6. Queen Mary and Queen Elisabeth's the Peoples consent and their acceptation was not only demanded but the Princes corporal oath also taken upon the Evangelists What is due to only Succession by Birth and what interest or right an Heir apparent hath to the Crown before he be Crowned or Admitted by the Common-wealth and how justly he may be put back if he have not the other parts requisite also CAP. VI Belloy's Assertions upon this Matter Assertion First BElloy's Assertions about this matter are plain and gross flatteries and opposite to all reason of State and practise of the World First he saith That all Families which enjoy Kingdoms in the world were placed therein by God only and that he alone can change the same Which indeed if he refer unto God's universal providence it is true that all is from God either by his Ordinance or permission but speaking of the next and immediate causes clear it is that men do also concur therein and that God hath left them lawful authoritie so to do for the publick benefit Assertion Second His Second Assertion is That where such Princes be once placed in Government and the Law of Succession by Birth established there the Princes Children or next of Kinn do necessarily succeed by only Birth without any new choice or approbation of the People Nobilitie or Clergie or of the whole Common-wealth together Assertion Third Whereunto he joyneth That a King never dieth for that whensoever or howsoever he ceaseth by any means to Govern then entereth the Successor by Birth not as Heir to the former but as lawful Governor of the Realm without any admission at all having his authoritie only by the condition of his Birth and not by adoption or choice of any
of Blood was established yet many examples do testifie That the next in Blood was oftentimes put back by the Common-wealth upon just causes Don Pelago's Son * being dead after two years Reign only none of his Children though he left divers were admitted because they were yong and unable to Govern But Don Alonso the Catholick his Son in Law who for his valiant acts was sirnamed the Great Don Aurelio and Don Silo to the prejudice of Don Fruela and his Children To Don Alonso succeeded his Son Don Fruela who was first a noble King But for that he declined to Tyrannie and put to death wrongfully his own Brother Don Vimerano rarely beloved of the Spaniards he was himself put to death by them And albeit he left two goodly lawful Children yet in hatred of the Father neither of them was admitted by the Realm to succeed him but his Cozen German Don Aurelio brothers Son to Don Alonso the Catholick who after six years Reign dying without issue a brother in Law of his named Don Silo was admitted Don Vermudo to the prejudice of Don Alonso the Chaste who nevertheless come's in again afterwards very happily This Don Silo being also dead without issue and the Spaniards anger against Don Fruela being now wel asswaged they admitted his aforesaid Son Don Alonso the yonger sirnamed the Chaste though his Reign for this time endured very little being put out by a bastard Uncle of his Don Aluregado with help of the Moors who after six years Reign dying also without issue the matter came in deliberation again Whether Don Alonso the Chaste that lived hidden in a Monasterie should be admitted again or rather his Cozen German Don Vermudo Son to his Uncle the Prince Vimerano whom his Father had slain The Realm determined Don * Vermudo though he were much farther off by Propinquity of Blood for that he was judged for the more valiant and able Prince than the other who seemed to be made more acquainted with the life of Monks than of a King Neither do the Historiographers of Spain reprehend this Fact of the Realm But King Vermudo after three years Reign being weary of a Kingly life and feeling some scruple of Conscience that he had forsaken the life Ecclesiastical he Resigned willingly the Government unto his said Cozen Don Alonso the Chast who after all his affliction having been deprived four times Reigned yet 51. years and proved the most valiant and excellent King that ever that Nation had both for his valor and other vertuous deeds and had great friendship with King Charles the Great of France who lived in that time Don Fruela to the prejudice of Don Ordonio's Children Don Ordonio the Second dying left four Sons and one Daughter and yet the State of Spain displaced them all and gave their Kingdom to their Uncle Don Fruela second Brother to their Father And Morales saith That there appeareth no other reason hereof but only for that these Sons of the King deceased were yong and not so apt to Govern well the Realm as their Uncle was And this notwithstanding that the said Morales writeth That at that time and before the Law of Succession by Propinquitie of Blood was so strongly confirmed that the Kingdom of Spain was made an inheritance so intayled and tyed only to the next in Blood as there was no possibility to alter the same Don Alonso 4th Son to Ordonio to the prejudice of Don Fruela his Children And Don Ramiro to the prejudice of the Children of Don Alonso And after a years Reign this King Fruela being dead and having left divers Children at mans state they were all put by the Crown and the eldest Son of the aforesaid Don Ordonio the second named Don Alonso the fourth was chosen for King Who leaving afterward his Kingdom and betaking himself to a Religious habit offered to the Common-wealth of Spain his eldest Son named Don Ordonio to be their King but they refused him and took his Brother Uncle to the yong Prince named Don Ramiro who reigned 19. years and was a most excellent King and gained Madrid from the Moors Don Sancho el Gordo to the prejudice of the yong Son of Ordonio the Third To Ramiro the second succeeded his elder Son Don Ordonio the third who after 7. years reign albeit he left a Son named el Enfante Don Vermudo yet he was not admitted but his Brother Don Sancho 1. sirnamed el Gordo Uncle to the yong Prince And the reason of this Alteration Morales giveth First that the said Enfante was a little Child and not sufficient for Government and defence of the Country But yet after Don Sancho had reigned and his Son Don Ramiro the third after him he was called and made King by the Realm under the name of Vermudo 2. who left after him Don Alonso 5. and he again his Son Don Vermudo 3. who Marrying his Sister Dona Sancha that was his Heir unto Don Ferinando first Earle and then King of Castile who was second Son to Don Sancho * Mayor King of Navar he joyned by these means the Kingdoms of Leon and Castile together which were separated before And so ended the Line of Don Pelago and entered the Blood of Navar The Third Race Dona Berenguela to the prejudice of her elder Sister Dona Blancha and her Son St. Lewis of France For the Third Race Prince Lewis of France who afterwards was King Lewis 8. Son to Philip Augustus having married Dona Blancha of Spain that was Neece to King John of England by her Mother-side upon these Conditions on the part of King John thereby to make Peace with the French that she should have for her Dowry all those Towns and Countries which the said King Philip had taken upon the English in Normandie and Gasconie And on the part of Spain That if the Prince Henry only Brother to the said Lady Blanch should die without issue then she should Succeed in the Crown of Spain got Lewis 9. by her And yet Prince Henry her Brother dying without issue both she and her Son were put by and excluded by the State of Spain against the evident Right of succession and Propinquitie of Blood And her yonger Sister * Dona Berenguela was admitted And the only Reason they yielded thereof was not to admit Strangers to the Crown Don Sancho el Bravo to the prejudice of his Nephews Don Alonso and Hernando de la Cerda The Prince of Spain * Don Alonso Nephew to St. Fernando dying before the King his Father left two * Sons Don Alonso and Hernando de la Cerda whom the Grand-father left Commended to the Realm as lawful Heirs apparent to the Crown Yet for that one Uncle of theirs yonger Brother to their Father named Don Sancho el * Bravo was like to manage the matters of War better than they he was by a general
Parlament Holden at Segovia 1276. made Heir apparent of Spain and they put back in their Grand-father's time and by his and the Realms consent And this Don Sancho coming to the Crown in the year 1284. the two Princes were put in Prison but afterwards at the suit of Philip 3. of France their Uncle they were let out and endued with certain Lands and also they remain unto this day And of these do come the Dukes of Medina Celi and all the rest of the House of Cerda which are of much Nobilitie in Spain at this time and King Philip that Reigneth cometh of Don Sancho the yonger Brother Henry the Bastard and his Race to the prejudice of King Petro and his Heirs When Don Pedro the Cruel King of Castile was driven and his Bastard Brother Henry 2. set up in his place John of Gant Duke of Lancaster having Married Dona Constancia the said King Peter's Daughter and Heir pretended by succession the said Crown of Castile as indeed it appertained unto him But yet the State of Spain denied it flatly and defended it by Arms and prevailed against John of Gand as did also the Race of Henry the Bastard against his lawful Brother And though in this Third and principal Discent of the Kings of Spain when these Changes happened the matter of Succession were most assuredly and perfectly established yet no man will deny but that the Kings of Spain who hold by the latter Titles at this day be true and lawful Kings This King Henry the Bastard had a Son named John the first who succeeded him in the Crown of Spain and Married Dona Beatrix Daughter and Heir of King Ferdinando the first of Portugal But yet after the death of the said Ferdinando the States of Portugal would never agree to admit the said Juan for their King for not subjecting themselves by that means to the Castilians And took rather a Bastard Brother of the said Don Ferdinando named Don Juan a youth of twenty years old whom they Married afterward to the Lady Philippe Daughter of John of Gand by his first Wife Blancha Duchess and Heir of Lancaster in whose Right the Kings of Portugal and their Discendents do pretend unto this day a certain interest to the House of Lancaster Divers other Examples out of the States of France and England for proof that the next in Blood are somtimes put back from succession And how God hath approved the same with good success CAP. VIII Though the Crown of France never come to any Stranger yet it Changed twice in it self and had Three Rancks COncerning the State of France albeit since the entrance of their first King Pharamond they have never had any stranger come to wear their Crown yet among themselves have they changed twice their whole Lineage of Kings and have had three Discents and Races as well as the Spaniards The first of Pharamond the second of Pepin and the third of Capitus which endureth unto this present The First Ranck The First Ranck shall be let pass for that some perhaps may say that the Common-wealth and Law of Succession was not then so well setled as it hath been since and also because it were too tedious to peruse all the Three Rancks for the store that they may yield Examples of the second Ranck Carloman against the Law of Succession and the Order of his Father parted equally the Realm with his elder Brother Charles Pepin le Bref first King of the second Race left two Sons Charles and Carloman and his States and Kingdoms by Succession unto the eldest Charles the Great And albeit by that Law of Succession the whole Kingdom of France appertained unto him alone yet the Realm by his authoritie did part it equally between them two as Gerard du Haillan setteth down in these words Estant Pepin decedé les François eslurent Roy Charles Carloman ses fils à la charge qu'ils partagerrient entr'evor egalement le Roy And the very same citeth Belforest out of Egenart an ancient French Writer Charlemayne preferred to his nephews against succession After three years reign Carloman dying left many sons the elder whereof was named Adalgise but Belforest saith That the Lords Ecclesiastical and temporal of France swore fidelitie and obedience to Charles without any respect or regard at all of the children of Carloman who yet by right of succession should have been preferred And Paulus Emilius a Latine-writer saith Proceres regni ad Carolum ultrà venientes regem eum totius Galliae salutârunt whereby is shewed that exclusion of the children of Carloman was not by force or tyrannie but by free deliberation of the Realm Lewis 1. deposed Charles le Chauve his fourth son admitted to the prejudice of his elder brothers To Charles the Great succeeded Lewis le Debonnaire his only son who afterward at the pursuit principally of his own three sons by his first wife Lothaire Pepin and Lewis was deposed and put into a Monasterie But coming afterward to reign again his fourth son by his second wife named Charles le Chauve succeeded him against the right of succession due to his elder brother Lothaire Louys 2. to the prejudice of his elder brethren and his bastards to the prejudice of his lawful sons After Charles le Chauve came in Louis le Begue his third son the second beeing dead and the eldest for his evil demeanure put by his succession This Lewis left by his wife Adel trude daughter to King Alfred of England a little infant newly born and two bastard-sons of a Concubine Louys * and Carloman who for that the nobles of France said That they had need of a man to bee King and not a childe were to the prejudice of the lawful successor by the State chosen jointly for Kings and the whole Realm was divided between them And Q. Adeltrude with her childe fled into England Charles 4. to the prejudice of Louys 5. And Odo to the prejudice of Charles 4. Of these two Bastards Carloman left a son Louis le Faineant which succeded unto him But for his slothful life and vicious behaviour was deprived and made a Monk in the Abbey of St Denis where hee died And in his place was chosen for King of France Charles le * Gros Emperor of Rome who likewise afterward was for his evil government by them deposed and deprived not onely of the Kingdom but also of his Empire and was brought into such miserable penurie as divers write hee perished for want In his place was chosen Odo Earl of Paris and Duke of Angers of whom came Hugh Capet Charles the simple to the prejudice of Odo But beeing soon wearie of this man's government they deposed him as hee was absent in Gasconie and called Charles * named afterward the Simple out of England to Paris and restored him to the Kingdom of France leaving onely
much more a bare Betrothing such as is between an Heir apparent and a Common-wealth St. Paul determineth plainly That if two Gentiles married together in their Gentilitie which none denieth to be true marriage for so much as concerneth the Civil Contract and afterward the one of them being made a Christian the other would not live with his partie or if he do yet not without blaspheming of God and tempting him to sin In this case he teacheth That it is sufficient to break and dissolve utterly this heathen marriage and that the Christian may marrie again and this only for the want of Religion in the other party Which being so in actual marriage already made consummate how much more may it serve to undo a bare betrothing which is the case of a Pretender only to a Crown as before hath been shewed Whether Difference in Religion be Infidelitie But some may say that St. Paul speaketh of an Infidel or Heathen that denieth Christ plainly which is not the case of a Christian Prince though he be somwhat different in Religion To which is answered That supposing there is but one only Religion that can be true among Christians as both Reason and Athanasius his Creed doth plainly teach us and moreover seeing that to me there can be no other Faith or Religion available for my salvation than only that which I my self do believe for that mine own Conscience must testifie for me or against me certain it is that unto me and my Conscience he which in any Point believeth otherwise than I do and standeth wilfully in the same is an Infidel for that he believeth not that which in my Faith and Conscience is the only and sole truth whereby he must be saved And so long as I have this opinion of him albeit his Religion were never so true I shall do against my Conscience and sin damnably in the sight of God to prefer him to a Charge where he may draw many other to his own Errors and Perdition wherein I do perswade my self that he remaineth How he that doth against his Conscience sinneth And this Point is founded upon that which St. Paul saith against such Christians as being invited to the Banquets of the Gentiles did eat the meats offered to Idols which themselves do judge to be unlawful to eat which he saith was a damnable sin not for that the thing in it self was unlawful but for that they did judge it so and yet did the contrary And the reason he yieldeth presently Quia non ex fide omne autem quod non est ex fide est peccatum Doing a thing though in it self indifferent against their own Conscience which must be their witness at the latter day How dangerous a sin to favor a Pretender of a contrary Religion Now to apply this to the matter of England I affirm and hold That for any man to give his Help or Consent towards the making of a King whom he judgeth or believeth to be faultie in Religion how good or bad soever he be or of what side soever the truth be it is a most grievous and damnable sin And is guilty of all the evils miseries and calamities which may ensue by his Government whether they do so or no Because knowing in his belief that he is like or in disposition to bring all those evils yet he doth further or not resist him How far it is also against Wisdom and Policie to prefer a Prince of a contrary Religion Moreover besides the matter of Conscience It cannot in Policie but be great folly and over-sight for a man to promote to a Kingdom wherein himself must live one of a contrary Religion to himself For let the bargains agreements and promises be never so great yet seeing the Prince once settled must needs proceed according to the principles of his own Religion it followeth also that he must come quickly to break with the other Partie And so many Jealousies Suspitions Accusations c. will light upon him as not only he shall not be capable of such Preferments Honors and Charges which men may deserve and desire in their Common-wealths but also he shall be in continual danger and subject to a thousand molestations and injuries and so before he beware will become to be accompted an enemy or backward man Which to remedy he must either dissemble deeply and against his own Conscience make shew to favor and set forward that which in his heart he doth detest which is the greatest calamity and miserie of all other or else to avoid this everlasting perdition he must break with all the temporal commodities of this life and leave the benefits which his Country might yield him And this is the ordinary end of all such men how soft and sweet soëver the beginnings be The Conclusion of the whole Speech That the next Heir after the Queen must needs be verie Doubtful And therefore to conclude all this Speech Seeing there be so great inconveniencies and dangers in respect both of God and man body and Soul to advance to the Crown a Prince of contrary Religion And considering that in England there is so great diversitie of Religions as the world knoweth between these Parties and Factions that have to Pretend or admit the next Prince after Her Majestie that now is Calling to mind also the great Libertie Scope and Authoritie which the Common-wealth hath to determine even against the clear right of Succession And laying finally before our eies the manifold and different Acts of Christian Realms before mentioned in this affair It appeareth as it was propounded in the beginning That it is a very doubtful case who shall be the next Prince after the Queen And much more if above all this it be proved also as it shall be in the Second Book that among such as do or may pretend of the Blood Royal at this day their true Succession and next Propinquitie by birth is also incertain and disputable FINIS CAP. I. BOOKS WRITTEN 1. BY one Hales sirnamed Clubfoot Clerk of the Hamp in which the Lord Keeper Bacon was thought to have a hand and Sir William Cecil a privitie 2. In favor of the Lady Katharine Gray daughter of the Lady Frances Dutchess of Suffolk the daughter of Marie yonger daughter of Henry 7. to prefer her before the Scot discended of Margaret the elder daughter 3. Because he was a Stranger or Alien therefore not to inherit by Law 4. Henry 8. had authority given him by two Parlaments of 28. and 36. to dispose of the Succession by his last Will and ordained his own issue failing that the off-spring of Mary should be preferred before that of Margaret 5. Against this one Morgan a Divine of Oxford with the advice of Judge Brown as it was thought wrote first to clear the Queen of Scots from her Husbands death 2 handled her Title to our Crown 3 against the
hous of York that challenged the Crown and died in the quarrel His son was Edward the 4. The Issue of the Duke of Glocester Thomas of Woodstock had onely one childe Anne married to the Lord Stafford whose issue came after in regard of this marriage for Thomas was Earl of Buckingham too to bee Duke of Buckingham som of whose blood are yet in England The Issue of John of Gant by his first Wife John of Gant had three Wives 1 Blanch the heir of Lancaster aforesaid by whom hee had Henry 4. and Philippe married to John King of Portingal from whom are lineally descended such as at this day claim interest in that Crown and Elisabeth married to John Holland Duk of Exceter whose grand-childe Henry left onely Anne married to Sir Thomas Nevil Knight from whom the Earl of Westmerland is lineally descended By his second Wife By his second Ladie Constance daughter of Peter King of Castile hee had onely one daughter Katharine married to Henry the third King of Castile of whom the King of Spain that now is is lineally desended By his third Wife Henry 7. his Title His third Katharine Swinford daughter to a Knight of Henault and attending on his wife Blanch hee used as his Concubine in his wife Constance's time and begat of her three sons and one daughter and after married her to Swinford an English Knight who dead and his wife Constance also hee married her Anno 1396 and caused his said children by her to bee legitimated by Parlament Anno 1397. Henry 7. his Title from Lancaster His sons were 1. John Duke of Somerset 2. Thomas Duke of Excester 3. Henry Bishop and Cardinal of Winchester His daughter Jane married to the Earl of Westmerland The Issues of all these were soon spent except of John of Somerset who had two sons John and Edmund John one onely daughter Margaret married to Edmund Tidder Earl of Richmond by whom hee had Henry 7. Edmund and his three sons all died in the quarrel of the Hous of Lancaster without Issue The line of Clarence and Title of the Earl of Huntington George Duke of Clarence second brother of Edw. 4. had Issue Edw. Earl of Warwick put to death by Henry 7. and Margaret Countess of Salisbury married to Sir Richard Poole of Wales by whom hee had Henry Arthur Geoffroy and Reynald after Cardinal Henry Lo. of Montague put to death with his mother by H. 8. had Katharine married to the Earl of Huntington they the now Earl c. and Wenefred married to Sir Tho. Barrington Arthur Marie married to Sir John Stanny and Margaret to Sir Tho. Fitzherbert Geoffrey Geoffrey Poole hee Arthur and Geoffrey which yet live in Italie Henry 7. his Issue The Title of Scotland and of the Ladie Arbella Henry 7. had by the eldest daughter of Edw. 4. for of all the other three remaineth no issue besides Hen. 8. Margaret first married to the K. of Scots they James 5. who Mary mother to the now King After married to the Earl of Anguis they Margaret married to the Earl of Lenox they Henry married to the last Queen and murthered 1566. and Charles married to Elisa Ca4dish by whom the Ladie Arbella The Title of the Lord Beacham and his brother Marie the second daughter first married to Lewis 12. of France without issue then to Charles Brandon Duke of Suffolk they Francis married to Henry Gray Marquis Dorset after Duke of Suffolk beheaded by Q. Mary they Jane married to Dudley both beheaded Katharine first married to the Earl of Pembroke and left by him to the Earl of Hartfort as themselves affirmed in the Tower from whom descendeth the Lord Beacham and Edward Seymer his brother The Title of the Hous of Derbie Eleonor second daughter to Ch. Brandon and the Queen of France was married to Henry Clifford Earl of Cumberland they had issue Margaret married to Henry Earl of Derbie who had issue the last and the now Earl CAP. IV. The Controversie between the Houses of Lancaster and York The Pretence of the Hous of York BY Richard Duke of York son of Richard Earl of Cambridg aforesaid c. That considering hee had by descent joined in him the right aswell of Lionel Duke of Clarence second son to Edw. 3. as of Edward Duke of York the fourth son of Edw. 3. hee was to bee preferred before the Hous of Lancaster claiming onely from John of Gant the third son of Edward 3. Richard 2. Deposed Edward 3. in his old age for the love hee bare to the black Prince confirmed the Succession by Parlament to Richard 2. his son and caused the rest of his sons to swear thereunto Richard 2. for his misgovernment was deposed by common consent and Henry 4. chosen in his place which himself and his issue possessed about 60 years The question is Whether King Richard were rightfully deposed or no That a King may bee deposed on just causes First that a King on just causes may bee deposed is proved by Reason becaus the rule beeing given by the Common-wealth on condition of just government that much violated the condition is broken and the same Common-wealth may take the forfeiture This proved by the autoritie of all Law-makers Philosophers Divines and Governors of Common-wealths and by example of divers Depositions which God himself hath blessed with good success Proved by reasons and examples of Divinitie An ill Prince is an armed enemie with his feet set on the Realm's head whence hee cannot bee plucked but by force of Arms Object God may cut him off by sickness or otherwise and therefore wee are to attend his good pleasure Answ. God alwaies bindeth not himself to work miracles nor often with extraordinary means but hath left upon earth unto men and Common-wealths power to do justice in his Name upon offendors Examples hereof are Ehud stirr'd up by God to kill Eglon King of the Moabites by a stratageme Judg. 3. and the Philistins to kill David to persecute Saul Jeroboam to rebell against Roboam the son of Solomon 2 Reg. 11. 12. Jehu to depose Joram and Q. Jezabel his mother 4. Reg. 9. The Captains of Jerusalem at the persuasion of Jehoiada the high-Priest to conjure against Q. Athalia whom they deposed and Joash chosen in her room 4. Reg. 11. All which hee might have removed without blood-shed if hee would But hee appointed men to work his Will by these violent means to deliver that Common-wealth from oppression and for the greater terror of all bad Princes Allegations of the Lancastrians that King Richard 2. was justly Deposed Just causes of Deposing Richard 2. were Hee murthered his Uncle the Duke of Glocester without form of Law or process Hee put to death the Earl of Arundel banished Warwick Thomas Arundel Archbishop of Canterbury and Henry Duke of Hereford and Lancaster and after King whose goods and inheritance descending to the said Henry from his Father hee wrongfully seized on Hee suffered the Earl of Oxford
his minion to put away his wife a goodly young Ladie daughter of Isabell his father's sister and to marrie another openly to her disgrace And in the last evil Parlament hee made would needs have all absolute autoritie granted to 6 or 7 his favorites to determine of all matters Grieved with these exorbitant indignities the more or better part of the Realm called home by their Letters Henry 4. deposed Richard 2. by Act of Parlament by his own confession of unworthie Government and his voluntarie resignation of the Crown to the said Henry by publick instrument All this without blood-shed And in almost all this Edmund L. D. of York the head of that familie together with Edward Duke of Aumale his eldest son and Richard Earle of Cambridge his yonger the Grand-father of Edward 4. assisted the said Henry That Henry 4. had more right to Succeed unto Richard 2. than Edmond Mortimer heir of Clarence much more any other King Richard 2. deposed the question is Whether Edmond Mortimer then alive his Father Roger being slain in Ireland a little before Nephew removed of Lionel Duke of Clarence or Henry Duke of Lancaster son of John of Gant should have Succeeded in right For Henry is alleged his being neerer to the former King by two degrees and proximitie of Blood though not of the elder Line is to be or hath been preferred in these cases 2. His Title came by a Man the others by a Woman not so much favored by Law nor Reason 3. The said Edmond being offered the Crown by Richard Earle of Cambridge who had married his Sister Anne and other Noblemen at Southampton he judged it against equitie discovered the Treason to Henry the fifth by whose command those Noblemen were executed 1415. Thirty years after which Richard Duke of York son of the aforesaid Earle and Anne for Edmond her brother died without issue set his Title on foot And whereas Roger Mortimer Father of this Edmond was declared Heir apparent by a Parlament 1382 that was done by Richard 2. from the hatred he bore to John of Gant and his son Henry rather than for the goodness of the others Title the cause whereof was Because immediately after the death of the Black Prince divers learned and wise men held opinion That John of Gant eldest son of Edward 3. then living should rather succeed than Richard jure Propinquitatis This made the old King Edward 3. confirm the Succession to Richard 2. by Parlament and the Oaths of his Uncles and made the yong King Richard 2. hold first and his son in jealousie and hatred ever after as distrusting the likelihoods of their Title Declaration of the Heir Apparent in the Princes life being Partial no sure president Partial establishing of Succession by Parlament is no extraordinary thing with Princes which yet most commonly have been to little purpose So did Richard 3. cause John de la Pole Earle of Lincoln and Son to his sister Elisabeth Dutchess of Suffolk to be declared Heir apparent thereby excluding his Brother Edward's four Daughters c. So did Henry 8. prefer the issue of his yonger sister before that of his elder So did Edward 6. declare the Lady Jane Gray his cozen Germain removed to be his Heir and Successor excluding his own two sisters Such say they was the aforesaid Declaration of Roger Mortimer by Richard 2. to as little purpose as from little equity Uncle preferred before the Nephew divers times Contra Sect. 83. That John of Gant should have in right succeeded his father rather than Richard himself as neerer to his father is proved by the course of divers Kingdoms where the Uncle was preferred before the Nephew 1. In Naples much about the same time Robert before Charles the son of Martel his elder Brother 2. In Spain Don Sancho Bravo before the Children of Prince Don Alonso de la Cerda from whom the House of Medina Celi is discended by sentence of Don Alonso the wise and of all the Realm and Nobility Anno 1276. 3. In the Earldom of Arthois Mande before Robert son to her Brother Philip by sentence of Philip le Bel of France confirmed by the Parlament of Paris and by his Successor Philippes de Valois whom he the said Robert had much assisted in the recovery of France from the English 4. In Britanie John Breno Earle of Montfort before Jane Countess of Bloys Daughter and Heir of Guy his elder brother by sentence of Edward 3. and the State of England who put him in possession of that Dukedom 5. In Scotland where albeit Edward 1. of England gave sentence for John Baliol Nephew to the elder Daughter excluding thereby Robert Bruse son to the yonger yet that sentence was held to be unjust in Scotland and the Crown restored to Robert Bruse his son whose posterity holds it to this day 6. The like whereof in Naples Lewis Prince of Taranto son to Philip prevailed before Joan the Neece of Robert aforesaid who was Philip's elder brother though Philip died before Robert because he was a man and a degree neerer to his Grand-father than Joan. 7. And in England it self Henry 1. preferred before William son and Heir of Robert of Normandie his elder brother And King John preferred before Arthur D. of Britanie the son and Heir of his elder brother Geoffrey because he was neerer to Richard his brother then dead than was Arthur Which Right of his the English inclined still to acknowledge and admit and thereupon proclaimed him King notwithstanding that the French and other Forrein Princes of stomach opposed themselves against it King John rightfully preferred before his Brother Arthur Against this last King Richard when he was to go to the Holy Land caused his Nephew Arthur to be declared Heir apparent to the Crown thereby shewing his Title to be the better Answ 1. It was not by Act of Parlament of England for Richard was in Normandie when he made it 2. Richard did it rather to repress the amhitious Humor of John in his absence 3. This Declaration was never admitted in England but renounced by consent of the Nobility in his absence 4. Richard himself at his return disadvowed it appointing John to be his Successor by his last Will and caused the Nobles to swear Fealtie unto him as to his next in blood The Opinion of Civil Lawyers touching the Right of the Uncle and Nephew Contra Sect. 83. This Controversie divided all the Lawyers in Christendom Baldus Oldratus Panormitanus c. for the Nephew Bartolus Alexander Decius Alciatus Cujatius c. for the Uncle Baldus himself at length concludeth That seeing rigor of Law runneth only with the Uncle being properly neerest in blood by one degree and that only indulgence and custom permitteth the Nephew to represent his Father's place whensoëver the Uncle is born before the Nephew and his elder brother dieth before his Father as in the case of John of Gant and Richard 2. he may be
preferred for the elder brother cannot give or transmit that thing to his Son which is not in himself before his Father die nor can his son represent what the Father never had The Common-Law dealeth not with the Point of Succession to the Crown Touching the Common Law the right and interest to the Crown is not expresly decided in it nor is it a Plea subject to the rules thereof but superior and more eminent nor are the Maxims thereof alwayes of force in this as in others As in the case of Dower Copercenars and Tenancie by the courtesie No more ought they to be in this case of inheritance as by the former eight Presidents hath been shewed The Common Lawyers then refer this point of the Crown to Custom nothing being in effect written by them touching it Only the best of our old ones favored that title of Lancaster and Chancelor Fortescue and Sir Tho. Thorope chief Baron of the Exchequer in Henry 6. his time were much afflicted for it by the contrary faction The Princes of York often Attainted The Princes of York forfeited their Right by their Conspiracies and Attainder thereupon as R. Earle of Cambridge put to death therefore by the Judgment of his Peers his elder brother the Duke of York being one of the Jury that condemned him His son Richard Duke of York was also attainted of treason after many oaths to Henry 6. sworn and broken by him and his son Ed. 4. with the rest of his off-spring to the ninth degree at a Parlament at Coventry Anno 1459. But the House of Lancaster was never attainted of any such crime The Hous of York came to the Crown by Violence and Crueltie Edward 4. entred by violence wilfully murthering besides divers of the Nobilitie Henry 6. a good and holy King and his son Prince Edward dispossessing the Hous that had held the Crown about 60 years together in which time their Title had been confirmed by many Parlaments Oaths Approbations and publick Acts of the Common-wealth and the consent of all forreign Nations All which had been enough to have autorized a bad Title Those of Lancaster better Princes than those of York The 4 Henries of the hous of Lancaster were far more worthie Princes then the 4 Princes of the Houses of York as Edw. 4. Rich. 3. Hen. 8. Edw. 6. And if the affairs of any the former especially the 3d succeeded not the chief caus thereof was the sedition rebellion and troubles raised by those of York and their contention against the Princes of the Houses of Lancaster The Cruelty of the Princes of York one to the other The Princes of York have not been onely cruel to their enemies but to themselvs too embrewing their hands in their own blood Then when they had ruined th'other George Duke of Clarence conspired against Edw. 4. his own brother with whom reconciled Edw. caused him afterwards to bee murthered at Calis Rich. 3. murthered his two young Nephews and Henry 8. a great number of that Hous as Edmund de la Poole his Cousin German Henry Duke of Buckingham his great Ant 's son extinguishing that and ruining this familie Also Henry Courtney Marquis of Exceter his own Cousin german the Ladie Margaret Countess of Salisbury and daughter to George D. of Clarence and her son the L. Montague c. The kindness of the Princes of Lancaster But the Love Union Confidence Faithfulness Kindeness and Loialtie of the Princes of Lancaster towards th'other was very notable as in the 2 brothers of Henry 4 and the 3 brothers of Henry 5. and in five or six Dukes of Somerset their near Cosens which argueth both a marvellous confidence those Princes had in that quarrel and a great blessing of God unto the whole familie that agree'd so well The Successes of such noble Houses as followed either partie Another blessing seemeth to bee bestowed on them That no antient great Houses are remaining at this day in England but such as chiefly took their parts as Arundel Oxford Northumberland Westmerland and Shrewsbury whereas the chief partakers of the other Faction are all destroied as Mowbray Duke of Norfolk De la Poole Duke of Suffolk th' Earl of Salisbury th' Earl of Warwick and many others CAP. III. Examination of the Title of the Hous of Scotland Sect. 28. Allegations for the K. of Scots 1. THat hee is descended of the eldest daughter of Henry 7. without bastardie or other lawful impediment and therefore hath the right of prioritie 2. The benefit would accrew unto the Common-wealth by the uniting of England and Scotland a point long sought for 3. The establishing of true Religion in England Hee is not of the Hous of Lancaster but rather of York Hee is not descended truly of the Hous of Lancaster becaus not of the Ladie Blanch the true heir thereof but of Kathathine Swinford whose children were unlawfully begotten though afterwards legitimated by Parlament so that his best Title is by York inferior to that of Lancaster and therefore is to com in after them of that Hous Forrein birth not just impediment in Succession to the Crown of England Hee is Forrein born and therefore excluded by the Laws of England from inheriting within the land Answ 1. This Assertion in an universal sens is fals for a stranger may purchase and inherit by the right of his wife 7 9 Edw. 4. 11 14 Henrie 7. 2. The Statute of 25 Edw. 3. is to bee restrained unto proper inheritance onely viz. That no person born out of the Allegiance of England whose father and mother were not of the same Allegiance at the time of his birth shall not demand inheritance within the same Allegiance 3. This Statute toucheth not the Crown nor any except express mention bee made thereof 4. The Crown cannot properly bee called an inheritance of Allegiance or within Allegiance beeing held immediately from God 5. The Statute meaneth inheritance by descent onely but the Crown is a thing incorporate and therefore goeth as by Succession Now if a Prior Dean c. or other head incorparate though an alien may inherit or demand Lands in England notwithstanding the Statute much more may the Inheritor to the Crown 6. Express exception is made in the Statues of Enfants du Roi which word cannot but include all the King's off-spring and blood-Roial 7. King Stephen and Henry 2. born out of the Realm and of parents that were not of the Allegiance of England when they were born were yet admitted to the Crown without contradiction which argueth that by the cours of the Common Law there was no such stop against Aliens and that if the Statute would have abridged the antient libertie in this case of Succession it would have made special mention there which it doth not The King of Scots excluded by the last Will of Henry 8. Henry 8. his Will whereby he excludeth the off-spring of Margaret S. 4. Which though somwhat infringed by the testimony of two
travel into Italie confessed it at his return and both of them affirmed they were man and wife but because they could not prove it by witnesses and for attempting such a matter with one of the Blood Royal without privitie and license of the Prince they were both committed to the Tower where they used means to meet afterwards and had the second Son Ed. Seymore Now the first Son may be ligitimate before God yet illegitimate before men and therefore incapable of Succession For the second to be legitimate whereas there wanteth nothing but witnesses for the presence of Minister is not absolutely necessary to justifie their marriages by Law The Queen herself her Counsel and as many as had the Examination of these parties upon their first act or Child-birth are witnesses unto them besides their resolution to continue man and wife protested before them and confirmed by this effect of their second carnal meeting in the Tower CAP. VII Examination of the Title of the Houses of Clarence and Britanie Against the House of Clarence in general THeir Claim is founded only upon the Daughter of George Duke of Clarence yonger Brother of Ed. 4. So that as long as any lawful issue remaineth of the Daughters of the elder brother no claim or pretence of theirs can be admitted 2. If the pretence of Lancast be better than that of York as before it seemeth to be proved S. 36. 38. 40. 42. c. then holdeth not this of Clarence which is meerly of York 3. The House of Clarence hath been often attainted 1. In George himself 2. In the Countess of Salisbury his Daughter and Heir 3. In the Lord Montague her Son and Heir whereby their whole interests were cut off For albeit since those attainders it hath been restored in Blood yet hath not that been sufficient to recover unto that House the ancient Lands and Titles of Honor thereunto belonging for they were forfeited to the Crown as is also to the next in Blood unattainted the prerogative of succeeding to the Crown unless special mention had been made thereof in their restauration Against the Earle of Huntington in favor of the Pooles Upon the attainder of the Lord Montague with his Mother of Salisbury all such right as they had or might had being cut off in them fell upon Geoffrey brother of the said Lord 1. Because he was not attainted 2. He was a degree neerer unto the Duke of Clarence and thereby hath the Priviledge of an Uncle before the Neece S. 34. 40. than the Lady Katharine 3. He was a man she a woman and neither of their Fathers in possession of the thing pretended which priviledge of Sex got the last King of Spain the Kingdom of Portugal 4. Inconvenience of Religion this point altered by the death of the last Earle First Title of the Infant as Heir unto the House of Britain from William the Conqueror Sect. 12. She is discended of the antient Royal Blood of England from the eldest Daughter of the Conqueror Constance whereof her friends infer two Consequences 1. When the Conqueror's sons died without issue or were made incapable of the Crown as Henry 1. seemed to be for the violence used to his elder brother Robert and his son William Sect. 11. then should the elder sister have entred before King Stephen who was born of Alice or Adela her yonger sister The coming of a Woman no bar to inher in England Though the Salick Law seemeth to exclude her from the Crown of France yet from the inheritance of England Britanie Aquitayne c. coming to her by Women and falling ordinarily in Women nor that nor other Law excludeth her Second Title of the Infant by France whereof she is Heir general from Henry 2. She is Lineally descended from Eleonor the eldest daughter of Henry 2. Sect. 15. by whom she is Heir general of France and thereby of England Sect. 15. for three reasons 1. King John by the murther of his Nephew Arthur of Britanie forfeited all his states whatsoever Now this happened four years before his son Henry 3. was born and therefore the Crown by right should have come to the said Eleonor his elder sister 2. Arthur being prisoner in the Castle of Roan and suspecting that he should be murthered by his Uncle John nominated the Lady Blanche daughter and heir to Eleonor to be his Heir which were it not good yet when he and his sister was put to death she and her Mother were next of kinn unto them for any more of England S. 12. 3. John was actually deposed by the Barons and States of the Realm 16 Regni sui and Lewis of France the Husband of Blanche elected and admitted with their whole consent to whom they swore Fealtie and Obedience in London for him and his heirs and posteritie 1217. giving him possession of London and the Tower and many other important places Now ableit that they chose after his John's son Henry 3 Yet Titles and Interests to Kingdoms once rightly gotten never die but remain ever for the posterity to set a foot so came Hugo Capetus to the Crown of France Odo Earle of Paris his ancester being once elected admitted and sworn King though after deposed and Charles the simple chosen Third Title of the Infanta from Henry 3. She is Lineally discended of Beatrix daughter of Henry 3. S. 17. Now seeing that the posterity of both her brothers Edward and Edmond the heads of the two Houses of Lancaster and York have oftentimes been attainted and excluded from the Succession by sundry Acts of Parliament and at this day are at contention among themselves why may not the right of both Houses by Composition Peace and Comprimise at least be passed over to their Sisters issue Objections against the Infanta 1. These her Claims are very old and worn out 2. Her claims are but collateral by sisters 3. She is a stranger and Alien born 4. Her Religion is contrary to the State Answered by those that favor her Title Antiquity hurteth not the goodness of Titles to Kingdoms when occasion is offered to advance them which commonly are never presumed to die nullum tempus occurrit Regi 2. Collateral Lines may lawfully be admitted to enter when the direct either fail or are to be excluded for other just respect 3. The point of forrein birth is sufficiently answered before Sect. 50. 4. The impediment of other Religion is not universal nor admitted in the judgment of all men but onely of such English as differ in Religion from her to the rest and those many it will rather bee a motive to favor then hinder her title CAP. VIII Examination of the Houses of Spain and Portugal The Dutchie of Lancaster belong's to Portugal THe King of Spain is lineally descended from the two daughters of John of Gant by his two first wives Sect. 23 24. the former whereof the Ladie Blanche beeing heir of the Duchie Sect. 19. when the posteritie of his issue male
by her came to bee exstinct as it was in the children of H. 6. there is no reason but the issue of his daughters those that claim by Portugal Sect. 23 should succeed at least in the inheritance of that Duchie The Crown of England to John of Somerset son to John of Gant But for the right and title to the Crown of England which came by John of Gant himself third son of Edw. 3 and eldest that lived when hee died John Earl of Somerset though begotten out of matrimonie yet afterwards legitimated Sect. 25. his eldest son by Katharine Swinford was to inherit before the Ladie Philippe his sister by the Ladie Blanche The first reason of Portugal against Somerset Against which the favorites of Portugal allege divers reasons 1. Beeing born out of Wedlock and in Adulterie Sect. 25. and continuing a bastard many years hee could not bee made legitimate afterwards by Parlament to that effect of Succession to the Crown before Q. Philippe of Portugall and her children born before his legitimation who thereby had vim acquisitam as the Law saith which could not bee taken away by any posterior Act of Parlament without consent of the parties interessed Second Reason John King of Portugal married the Ladie Philippe with condition to enjoy all prerogatives that at day were due unto her which was six or seven years before his legitimation For Don Alonso and Don Edwardo the two sons of the said John and Philippe were born in the years 1390 and 1391. And John of Gant married Katharine Swinford and legitimated her children in the years 1396 1397. Third Reason The marriage of John of Gant with Katharine Swinford helpeth litle to better this legitimation which by the rules of the Common and Civil Laws is but a bare deposition for their children were Spurii begotten in plain Adulterie not in fornication onely and consequently the Privilege that the Law giveth to the subsequent mariage of the Parties by legitimating such children as are born in simple fornication where the parties are single cannot take place here nor can any legitimation equal much less prefer the legitimated before the lawful and legitimate by birth The Fourth Reason alleged by the Favorers of Portugal against the Issue of John of Somerset When Henry 6. and his son were extinguished and Edw. 4. usurped the Crown there remained of the Ladie Philippe Alfonse the Fift King of Portugal her Nephew of John of Somerset Margaret Countess of Richmond his Neece The Question is which of these two Competitors of the Hous of Lancaster and in equal degree from John of Gant and Henry 6. should have Succession by right immediately after the death of Henry 6. Alfonso say they for three Reasons First hee was a man and Margaret but a woman though shee came of the man and hee of the woman 2. Hee descended of the lawful and eldest daughter shee of the younger brother legitimated 3. Hee was of the whole blood to H. 6. and shee but of the half In which regard hee was to bee preferred at least in all the interests of Succession which were to bee had from Henry 4. onely and were never in his father John of Gant which were many as his right gotten by arms upon the evil government of the former King his Election by Parlament and Coronation by the Realm c. see for the rest Sect. 35. 43. Besides when King Richard 2. was dead hee was next in degree of propinquitie unto him of any man living as hath before been proved Sect. 36. CAP. IX The Genealogie and Controversies of Portugal 76. The Genealogie of Portugal Emanuel had by one wife six children 1. John 3. hee John that died in his father's time hee Sebastian slain by the Moors in Barbarie 2. Isabel Grandmother to the present King of Spain 3. Beatrix Grandmother to the Duke of Savoy 4. Lewis father of Don Antonio lately deceased in England 5. Henry Cardinal and after King 6. Edw. father of Mary Duchess of Parma who hath two sons Ranuntius Duke of Parma and Edward a Cardinal and father of Katharine Duchess of Bragança yet living whose Issue is Theodosius Duke of Bragança Edward Alexander and Philippe young Princes of great exspectation Five pretenders unto the Crown of Portugal Sebastian beeing dead Henry son of Emanuel succeeded who beeing old unmarried unlikely to have issue before him was debated the right of five Pretenders to the Succession of that Crown vid. Philippe of Spain Philibert Duke of Savoy the Duke of Parma his mother beeing then deceased Don Antonio and the Duchess of Bragança the three first by their Deputies the fourth Anthonio by himself and for himself the fift by her husband the Duke and his learned Council Of these the Duke of Savoy was soon excluded becaus his mother was younger sister to K. Philip's mother and himself younger then Philippe Don Antonio a Bastard and excluded Don Antonio was also rejected and pronounced a bastard by the said King Henry for many reasons 1. Hee was taken to bee so all his father's life time and that without question 2. Certain Decrees coming out from Rome in the time of Julius 3. against the promotion of bastards hee sued to the said Pope to bee dispensed withall 3 His father Don Lewis hath oftentimes testified by word and writing that hee was his Bastard and signified asmuch in his last will 4. It is likely that if Lewis had married his mother who was base in birth and of the Jewish as som stories affirm hee would have made som of his friends and kindred acquainted therewith as a matter so much important to them to know which hee never did though the King avowed himself was present with him at his death 5. If hee had been legitimate why did hee not pretend the Succession before the said King next after the death of Sebastian beeing son to his elder brother as well as was Sebastian 6. Whereas hee had produced witnesses vid. his mother sister with her husband and two others to prove that his father before his death had married with his mother in secret the said K. Cardinal affirmed that upon their examination hee had found they were suborned by Anthonio becaus they agreed not in their reports and becaus som of them confessed they were suborned whereupon hee hath caused them to be punished If not why not Duke of Lanc. Seeing that in England wee hold the said Don Anthonio for true King of Portugal I see not how wee can deny his children their right at least to the Duchie of Lancaster whereof whosoëver is right heir of Portugal should bee rightest heir Sect. 70. Allegations to prove the Duke of Parm's right That hee represented his mother and shee her father Lo. Edward who had hee been alive had carried it from his elder sister Elisa K. Philip's 2. mother consequently his issue to bee preferred before hers 2. Against the Duchess of Bragança that his mother was the elder sister therefore
hee who represented her person was to bee preferred before her For the Duchess of Bragança and against the point of Representation Shee was born and bred in Portugal Philip and Parma were forrein 2. Shee was nearer by a degree unto Emanuel and Henry the Cardinal then the Duke of Parma 3. Against the representation urged by Parma that no representation was admitten in the Succession to the Crown of Portugal but that every pretender was to bee taken and preferred according to the Prerogatives onely of his Person as the next in propinquitie of blood or the man before the woman and the elder before the younger if they bee in equal degree of propinquitie to the former Kings Touching Representations Contra Sect. 40. The last King Sebastian entred the Crown by way of Representation not by propinquitie of blood the Cardinal beeing brother and hee but Nephew unto the former King John 3. Sect. 82. Answ. Hee was of the right descendant line of K. John 3. and the Cardinal but of the Collateral and all Law alloweth the right line to bee served and preferred before the Collateral bee admitted This was the caus of his coming to the Crown and not representation Allegations of King Philip's right to Portugal Seeing then that Representation was not admitted but every Pretendor considered in his own person onely Sect. 82. King Philip beeing in equal degree of propinquitie of blood with the Duchesses alleged hee was to bee preferred before them both becaus a man and born before them 2. The inheritance of Portugal besides that it belonged to the Crown of Castile of old evidently belonged to John King of Castile by the marriage of Beatrix daughter and heir of Ferdinand King of Portugal after whose death it was conferred by election of the People on John M. of Avis bastard-brother of the foresaid Ferdinand by him the said Beatrix and her posteritie wrongfully debarred and excluded King Philip his own carver in Spain When these contentions were at the hottest died the K. Cardinal before he could decide them Whereupon the K. of Spain taking his right to bee best and becaus a Monarch and under no temporal Judg thinking hee was not bound to attend any other or further judgment in the matter but might by force put himself in possession of his own as hee took it if otherwise hee might not have it hee entered upon Portugal by force of Arms and at this day holdeth it peaceably The end of the controversie An Objection in behalf of Representation in the Succession of England Representation taketh place in England So as the children of the son though women shall ever bee preferred before those of the daughter though men Therefore seeing the Ladie Philippes right to the Dukedom of Lancaster and Crown of England mentioned Sect. 70 72 c. is to bee preferred according to the Laws of England onely it followeth that the right of Succession pretended by the Princes of Portugal from the said Ladie Philippe should bee determined onely by the Laws of England which admit of Representation Answer to the former Objection The question is not here by what Law this pretence by Portugal to the Crown of England is to bee tried but rather who is the true and next heir of John of Portugal and the Ladie Philippe heir of Lancaster which once known it little importeth by what Law hee pretendeth his right unto England whether of Portugal or England though to determine this first and chief point of the Succession of Portugal the Laws of Portugal must needs bee the onely Judges and not those of England CAP. X. Whether it bee better to live under a Forrein or a Home-born Prince a great Monarch or a little King Against Forrein-Government the opinion of Law-makers ARistotle in all the different Forms of Common-wealths which hee prescribeth in his 8 books of Politicks ever presupposeth that the Government shall bee by people of the self-same Nation the same also do presume all the Law-makers therein mentioned as Minos Solon Lycurgus Numa Pompilius and the rest Of Orators and Writerr Demosthenes his famous invectives against Philip of Macedonia that desired to encroach upon the State of Greece and his Orations against Eschines who was thought secretly to favor the pretences of the said forrein Princes The books of the Italians when they speak of their former subjection to the Lombardes Germanes French and their present to the Spaniard The late writings of the French against the power of the hous of Guise and Lorrain whom they hold for strangers Of Nations by their Proceedings and Designs The desperate and bloodie executions of divers Nations to th' end they might rid themselvs from stranger's dominion are arguments of the very impression of nature herself in this matter for examples whereof see Q. Curtius lib. 5. 6. And the Sicilians who at one Evensong-tide slew all the French within their Iland whom themselvs had called and invited thither not long before And the English who murthered all the Danes at one time and would have don as much for the Normans if themselvs had been strong enough or the advers partie less vigilant And the French in the time of Charles the 7. when nothing could repress them from revolting every where against the English Government of which at length by hook and crook they wholly free'd themselvs Of Holy Scripture The autoritie of holy Scriptures is evident in this behalf Deut. 17. 16. Thou shalt make them King over thee whom the LORD thy GOD shall choos out of the number of thy brethren thou mai'st not set a stranger over thee which is not of thy brethren In the behalf of Forrein Government This hatred of Stranger's Government is but a vulgar aversion of passionate or foolish men Passionate by corruption of nature whereby men are inclined to think evil of others especially their Governors and the more the farther they are from us in kindred or acquaintance foolish as those that weigh not the true reasons causes or effects of things but onely the outward shew and popular apprehension grounded for the most part in the imagination or incitation of others who endeavor onely to procure tumults It importeth not what Countrimam the Prince bee so his Goverement bee good All passion against stranger or unto others laid aside wee are onely to respect the fruits of good and profitable Government the peace and proprietie of the Subject which what Prince bee hee native or forreign soëver procureth us is fittest for ours or any other Government for after a Prince is established the common subject hath no more conversation with him nor receiveth further personal benefits of him than of a meer stranger Then if hee govern ill what is the Subject the better by his beeing Home-born Home-born Princes and Tyrants As in the like case the children of Israël said of Rehoboam Quae nobis pars in David vel quae haereditas in filio Jesse 3 King 12. 16.
4. his time 2 Dukes 3 Earles 2 Barons 3 Knights and many other afterwards for this was but in the beginning of his Reign But when all doubt of Contention about Succession which moved those two Kings the more excusably to these cruelties was taken away in Henry 8. his time were either cut off or clean put down 2 Queens his wives 3 Cardinals 3 Dukes 1 Marquess 2 Earles 2 Countesses 6 Lords 6 or 7 Abbots Knights in great number Gentlemen infinite What Spaniard could or durst have done so much Better to live under a Great than a little Monarch 1 He is best able to defend and protect his subjects 2 He hath ordinarily least need to Pill and Pole them for a little King though never so mean will keep the State of a King which his subjects must maintain 3 He hath more to bestow upon his subjects for reward of Virtue or Valor A great Prerogative unto every subject to be born under one that hath much to give whereas he that is born in the Cities of Geneva or Genoa let him be of what abilitie or worth soëver can hope for no more preferment than those Common-wealths can give which is all too little what then would it be were there many worthie men born there at one time A Forrein Prince living among us without Forrein Forces Another manner of living under Forrein Princes is when the Prince cometh to dwel among us without Forces As did King Stephen and Henry 2. who were natural Frenchmen and as King Philip in Queen Maries time here in England and the last King of France in Polonia so should his Brother Monsieur have done here if the marriage between him and the Queen had gone forward Fit for our present State and beneficial to any No danger nor inconvenience can justly be feared from such a King The benefits are 1 He subjecteth himself rather to the Realm and Nation than they to him and if he live and marrie in England both he and his Children will quickly become English 2 For his assurance he must be inforced to cheerish the English thereby to gain and perpetuate to himself their good-will and friendship 3 He entereth with indifferent mind towards all men having no kindred or alliance within the Land to whom he is bound nor enemie against whom he may be incensed so as only merit and demerit of each man must move him to favor or dis-favor a great foundation of good and equal Government 4 He might be admitted upon such Compositions and Agreement as both the Realm should enjoy her antient Liberties and perhaps more for Forrein Princes upon such occasions of their preferment commonly yield to much more than the Domestical and the home-born Pretenders should remain with more security than they can well hope for under an English Competitor A Forrein Prince with Forrein Support A third manner is when the Prince bringeth Forces with him for his own assurance and these either present as the Danish Kings and after them the three first Norman Princes who either by the help of their first subjects already in England or by others brought in by them afterwardes wrought their evil Or that his Forces be so neer as he may call them in when he listeth and that without resistance as may the Scot whom no Sea divideth from us Insupportable to our or any State whatsoever All danger and inconveniences may justly be feared from such a King yea all the mischiefs either of Domestical or Forrein Governments For those of a Domestical Prince are Pride Crueltie Partialitie pursuing of Factions particular Hatred extraordinary advancing of his own Kindred extreme pinching and punishing of the Subject being sure of his own partie within the Realm by reason of his presence and therefore the less respective of others These vices such a Forrein Prince is the more subject too than the Domestical as having both external Counsel of a People that hate us to incense him and their external Force to effect his and their Designs The mischiefs of Forrein Government are Tyrannie of the Prince the servitude of the People filling and planting the Realm with strangers and dividing among them the Honors Dignities Riches and Preferment thereof All which are incident in all probabilitie to the third kind of Government and to be feared in the succession of the King of Scots whose case is within the second Branch thereof and may hereafter be within the first Forrein Princes affected by some Countries Best Romane Emperors strangers Where Kings go by Election commonly they take Strangers in the second kinde Sect. 105. so did the Lacedemonians and Romans in their first Monarchie and of late the Polonians in the Succession of their three last Kings and the Venecians by way of good Policie have made a perpetual Law That when they are to War and must needs chuse a General he be a stranger to wit some Prince of Italie who is out of their own States thereby to have him the more indifferent and equal to them all Among the latter Romans their best and most famous Emperors were strangers as Trajan and Adrian Spaniards Septimius Severus an African Constantine English Their worst Romans as Caligula Nero Heliogabalus Commodus Forrein Government which best which worst This Second then S. 105. is the best In the first kinde of being under Forrein Government and as a Province to be ruled by Deputies Viceroy's c. as the States mentioned S. 19. and as all the Provinces of the old Roman's States were all things considered and one taken with another the Commodities and Securities are more and the damages and danger less than in the Government of Domestical Princes And all the mischiefs of Forrein Government are only incident to the third and last S. 105. Other imputations to the other two proceeded from the blindness and passion of the vulgar and some private men most likely to be interessed therein S. 91. An Answer to the former Objection S. 89. against Forrein Government Upon other occasions and humors the vulgar will do as much against their own Country-men and Princes as the Sicilians did against the French c. S. 89. and often have both in England and else where when they have been offended or that seditious heads have offered themselves to lead them into tumults Aristotle Answered S. 89. Aristotle in his Politicks never handled expresly this our Question and consequently weighed not the reasons on both sides and so left it neither decided nor impugned and he that was Alexander's Master the Master of so many Forrein Countries could not well condemn it Demosthenes Answered S. 88. Demosthenes was well feed by the King of Asia to the end he should set Athens and other Grecian Cities at ods with Philip On the other side if Athens a Popular Government wherein the force of his tongue made him have greatest sway and authoritie were to have come under a Monarch he should have been in like credit as he fell out