Richard Pagget John Serle John Haines Esquires The King's Counsel were Sr Creswell Levens The Attorney General Mr Ward The evidence of this practice subornation was very clear and full particularly Mr Bedloe witnessed that Reading had often treated with him about mincing his Evidence for the bringing off the Lords and Sr Henry Titchborne and gave him Money at several times and did draw up a Paper of what Bedloe should Swear and did carry it to the Lords in the Tower to be viewed and corrected by them Mr Speke testified that Bedloe had from time to time informed him how the Treaty was carried on that upon the 29 th of March 1679. Mr Speke and VViggins Bedloe's Servant being concealed in his Chamber Mr Reading came and in the first place asked whether any body could hear their discourse and being assured that he was secure and secret he told Mr Bedloe upon his demand what the Lords in the Tower said and what my Lord Stafford said that as to my Lord Stafford he should be sure of the Estate in Gloucester-shire which had been promised to be setled upon him for my Lord had ordered him to prepare a blank Deed which within ten days after his Discharge should be perfected and the rest of the Lords did assure him that after they were acquitted in proportion to the service he did them in lessening of his Evidence he should have a plentiful Reward That Bedloe did then demand to have something under their hands but Reading said that they think that not convenient but I do take their Words and you must take mine and then promised to go to the Lords in the Tower against Munday to prepare and bring him the Instructions from them for his Evidence Mr Speke added that upon the Munday morning he was to watch and see the Delivery of the Paper and did see Reading put it into Bedloe's hand in the painted-Chamber who immediately delivered it to Mr Speke This Paper was all of Mr Reading's writing and being read in Court was found to contain the purport of the Evidence to be given against the Lords and was so ordered that the whole was only hear-say and could no way touch them Wiggins agreed with Mr Speke in the Evidence given of the Transactions between Mr Bedloe and Mr Reading in Mr Bedloe's Chamber Reading coming to make his Defence offered nothing against the credit of the Witnesses but did in effect confess all they had testified and the whole matter charged in the Indictment and in truth he was the greatest witness against himself as was well observed after he was found guilty by the Right Honourable Sr Robert Atkyns then one of the Judges of the Common-Pleas but soon after thrust out for non-Compliance with Sr Francis North then Chief Justice and is now most deservedly Lord Chief Baron of the Exchequer and Speaker of the House of Lords The Jury having brought him in guilty he was fined 1000 l. adjudged to a years Imprisonment and to be set in the Pillory upon the munday following for the space of one hour in the Palace-Yard in VVestminster When the late King James ascended the Throne he was a particular Favourite and his Suffering in this matter was well rewarded It may not seem impertinent to present the Reader upon this occasion with so much of Captain Bedloe's solemn Death-Bed Declaration as the Lord Chief Justice North allowed the World to see His Lordship was pleased to acknowledge that he took Captain Bedloe's Examination upon Oath at Bristol upon the 16 th of August 1681. And that he declared that the Duke of York had been so far engaged in the Plot that there was no part that had been proved against any Man that had suffered but he was to the full guilty of it all but what tended to the Kings Death from the trouble whereof the Jesuites had undertaken to deliver the Duke And his Lordship added that Mr Bedloe told him he lookt upon himself as a dying Man and that he must shortly appear before the Lord of Hosts to give an account of all his Actions and that because many persons had made it their business to baffle and deride the Plot He did for satisfaction of the World there declare upon the Faith of a dying Man and as he hoped for Salvation that whatever he had testified concerning the Plot was true and that he had many Witnesses to produce who would make the Plot as clear as the Sun. That the Jesuites had resolved the King's Death and would spare him no longer than he continued to be kind to them And that they resolved to set up an Head for their Cause here whatever came of it and said that if they should slip the opportunity they then had they should never have such another Notes upon the Tryal of Thomas Knox and John Lane for a Conspiracy to Defame and Scandalize Dr Otes and Mr Bedloe thereby to discredit their Evidence about the Popish Plot At the Kings-Bench Bar at VVestminster upon the 25 th of November 1679. The Judges then upon the Bench were Sr VVilliam Scroggs Lord Chief Justice Sr Francis Pemberton and Sr Thomas Jones THe unlucky miscarriage of Reading's attempt to corrupt the King's Evidence or to overthrow the credit of their Testimony deterred not others from prosecuting so pious a work for that is instantly succeeded by the cursed Conspiracy of Knox and of Lane and Osborne the one lately the other at that time a Servant to Dr Otes but Justice overtook them as the following Scheme of their Tryal shews The Indictment being read upon their pleading not guilty the following Jury was sworn Sr John Kirke Kt. John Roberts Thomas Harriot R. Waterhouse Henry Johnson Thomas Earsby Simon Middleton Joseph Ratcliffe Hugh Squire James Supple Francis Dorrington Richard Cooper Esq. The King's Counsel were Mr Attorney General Mr Solicitor General Mr Serjeant Maynard Sr Francis VVinnigton Mr VVilliams Mr Thomas Smith Mr Trenchard For Knox Mr Saunders Mr VVithens and Mr Scroggs For Lane Mr Holt assigned by the Court. The Indictment opened by Mr Trenchard was that whereas Colman Ireland Pickering and Grove conspired to destroy the King and change the Religion Established by Law to introduce Popery and were thereof Convicted Attainted and Executed And whereas the Lord Powis Lord Arundel of VVardour and others were accused of those Treasons and Impeached for the same in Parliament c. The Defendants knowing Mr Otes and Mr Bedloe had given Information of these Treasons to stifle the Evidence and scandalize them did conspire to represent them as wicked Persons and of no credit And the Indictment further sets forth that Knox with the agreement of Lane and Osborne caused Letters to be wrote with contrivance to accuse Otes and Bedloe that they had conspired falsly to accuse the E. of Danby And that Otes had attempted to commit Sodomy with Lane that to effect those wicked designs Knox gave several sums of Money to Osborne and
to wrest from them their undoubted priviledge of chusing Sheriffs I shall take leave to subjoyn a brief account of the Indignities Violence then used towards several of the Chief Magistrates of the City but shall by the way though it comes not in its proper place present the Reader with a Transcript of the New-fashion'd Summons issued by the Lord Mayor upon the extraordinary occasion which then appeared to have Sheriffs of Sr L. Jenkins his Nomination By the Mayor THese are to require you that on Midsummer day next being the day appointed as well for Confirmation of the Person who hath been by me Chosen according to the Antient Custom and Constitution of this City to be one of the Sheriffs of this City and the County of Middlesex for the Year ensuing as for the Election of the other of the said Sheriffs and other Officers you cause the Livery of your Company to meet Together at your Common-Hall early in the Morning and from thence to come together Decently and Orderly in their Gowns to Guild-Hall there to make the said Confirmation and Elections Given this 19th Day of June 1682. Wagstaffe To return to what was last proposed The accustomed day for Swearing the Sheriffs being come the Aldermen were called to Guildhall by Summons from the Lord Mayor as follows Sir your Worship is desired to be at a Cort of Aldermen at Guildhall on Thursday at nine of the Clock in the forenoon in your Violet Gown and Cloke it being the 28th of September Hereupon at that hour six Aldermen viz. Sr John Laurence Sr Robert Clayton Sr Patience VVard Sr Thomas Goold Sr John Shorter and Alderman Cornish went with Mr Papillon and Mr Dubois to Guildhall where Quiney in a very insolent manner came to them and told them he had a command to keep the Hall clear whereupon they demanded whether he did not know them to be Magistrates of the City and could believe his Order reach'd them he replyed that he knew them and they must remove They then said they were summoned and attended in all peaceableness quickly after he accosted them again saying Gentlemen you must withdraw I have a command to require it They then demanded a sight of his Warrant but huffing he said he would shew none to such as they were and then laid hold of Sr P. Ward saying Sr you must remove and in the same manner laid hold of Sr John Laurence pulling him with such violence that he had like to have thrown him down and treating the rest of the Aldermen in that manner they were all forced to retire in this proceeding he was abetted and supported by Mr Wythers Wiseman Nichols Steverton c. then present in Guildhall proper men to be returned to serve upon the Jury in the foregoing Cause The Lord Mayor being come to the Court Mr Papillon and Mr Dubois declared that they were ready and did there tender themselves to take the Office of Sheriffs and to be sworn and humbly prayed the Answer of his Lordship the Court but without condescending thereto the Mayor went to the Hustings calling Mr North and Rich to follow him and there calling them to the Book to be sworn Mr Papillon and Mr Dubois offered themselves to be sworn and Mr Papillon laid his hand on the Book but his Lordship and Sr J. E. Sr W. P. and some other Aldermen commanded them to forbear and keep the Peace and be gone Some of the Aldermen claimed to be heard but the Mayor refused it and proceeded to swear North and Rich whereupon the duely elected Sheriffs with the six Aldermen withdrew protesting against those irregular and arbitrary proceedings Remarks upon the Tryal of my Lord Russell upon the 13 th of July 1683. UPon the Discovery of the Popish Plot the Conspirators finding their measures to be broken as indeed were those of the French King all over Europe they advised King Charles the Second to make use of the Discovery as a Cripple to beg Money of the then approaching Parliament which was immediately to sit for the better effecting thereof the obsequious Clergy were privately instructed to Preach against Popery and to magnifie the Discovery of the Plot this Doctrine was thundered out from the Pulpits till the Dissolution of that notorious Pentionary Parliament Having then found their hopes dash'd new Instructions were given and the Clergy advertised that there was some fear from the Dissenters but yet for a time they were to Preach against Popery but not to talk of the Plot this humour continued till the Dissolution of the Parliament which met in March 1678. was dissolved in May following 1679. Then they received advice that there was a Presbyteterian as well as a Popish plot this made the Ecclesiastical Drums beat loudly against Dissenters and that work was closely followed till the breaking the Parliament at Oxford in the beginning of the year 1681. When the Conspirators influenced too many of the Pulpits to thunder against the credit of the Popish plot and to insinuate a belief of a Presbyterian Plot which they were all the while hammering and by this art they did at length usher it into the World. The Nobility and Gentry of England to make bold with their own words in their Memorial for our now Gracious King and Queen then Prince and Princess of Orange had been as they therein freely confessed too slow to believe the desperate Popish Plot and had been deluded with the King's Promises to protect and maintain the Protestant Religion and the Laws and Government of England until they saw them all undermined But many discerning this Delusion more early than others did the never to be forgotten Duke of Monmouth Earl of Essex Lord Russel and Colonel Sidney with some other great and valuable Persons who were of that well-grounded Opinion That a free Nation like this of England might defend their Religion and Liberties when Invaded and taken from them under pretence and colour of Law began to bethink themselves how to restore Parliaments to their antient freedom and to deliver the Nation from the fury of that Torrent of Popery which they wisely fore-saw ready to break in and carry all before it At this juncture the Conspirators laid hold of the Information given by Keeling of unadvised and rash Discourses of a very small number of Men nine or ten at the most all Strangers to the Persons and honest Consultations of those great Men before named and they cunningly and maliciously â—…atch'd and work'd it into one piece and emitted it to the World by their Declaration read in all Churches under the name of a Presbyterian or Fanatick Plot which they had long wanted Hereupon a Proclamation pursues the Duke of Monmouth and some others designed for destruction who chose to stand aside out of the reach of the Blood-thirsty Conspirators But the Earl of Essex my Lord Russell and Colonel Sidney would not be overcome by the perswasions of those who invited
Mr Solicitor had shortened his Labour by the pains he had taken to sum up the Evidence to them which he concluded he had without doubt done with all faithfulness to his Master He then proceeds to blacken the Defendant with all the foul Language that Malice could suggest and tells his old Friends of the Jury whose acquaintance with him disposed them to credit him that the Popish Plot was a sham and that under the pretence thereof another black and bloody Conspiracy was carried on Then he magnifies the evidence against the Defendant both from the number of the St Omers Sparks no less then twenty but also their harmony and he affirms that against the credit of their Testimony there was no objection really made but only Impudence that the Defendant had produced but two positive Witnesses that they were likewise positive in their contradiction of one another that they swore according as their humour led them and not according to any remembrance they had of the thing and that he rather believed it because the third Witness Page gave an evidence contrary to both of them how notoriously false these malitious Suggestions are will evidently appear upon the perusal of what these three honest and plain-dealing Witnesses swore Then he comes to the Defendants fourth Witness Mr Walter and positively affirms that he says nothing to the matter for that it did plainly appear the time which he speaks of was about a year and a half before the five Jesuits Tryal which must be in 1677 before the Defendant went to St Omers Mr Solicitor told the Jury that Mr Walter spoke of a year and a quarter before the discovery of the Plot had that been true it had run it back to the year 1677 and to a time before the Doctor went to St Omers His Lordship makes Mr VValter to speak of about a year and a half before the Jesuits Tryal which runs it back to December 1677 and then the King 's celebrated Witnesses and Mr VValter are agreed but Mr Vvalter speaking for himself says the time was near a year and a quarter before the Tryal of the Jesuits which brings us to April 1678. Though the Chief Justice and Solicitor were not agreed in this matter yet they would not quarrel about it provided the understanding Jury would credit either of them against Mr Walter and so serve the turn they aimed at the baffling the credit of the Popish Plot and not allow this Witness to be serviceable to the Vindication of Dr Otes Upon the following day after this Tryal Dr Otes was tryed upon an Indictment for another supposed Perjury but that prosecution being of the Complexion with what is here presented I shall not trouble the Reader with any thing further upon this subject then to present him with the Names of the Jury viz. Sr Thomas Vernon Nicholas Charlton Esq Tho. Langham Esq Thomas Hartop Francis Griffith John Kent George Tory Ano. Hen. Loades Tory Also John Midgley John Pelling Thomas Short and George Peck The Juries having according to the direction of that Man of Blood Jeffryes brought in the Defendant guilty of both the Perjuries Comes the Abhorrer of Parliaments the tender-hearted good natured Protestant Judge VVythens to pronounce the Sentence This very Person Wythens being Counsel for Knox did declare openly in the Court of King's Bench that Dr Otes had served the Nation too well to be vilified in that Court. previous to it he tells the Defendant That no Christian 's Heart can think of the innocent Blood which was shed by his Oath without bleeding That every knowing Man believed and every honest Man grieved for it He proceeds God be thanked our Eyes are now opened You had not one Word to justifie your self from that great and heinous Perjury you were accused of transcendant Impudence The Judgment of the Court inter alia is You shall upon Wednesday next be VVhipt from Algate to Newgate Vpon Friday you shall be VVhipt from Newgate to Tyburn by the Hands of the common Hangman This I pronounce to be the Judgment of the Court upon you and I must tell you plainly If it had been in my power to have carried it further I should not have been unwilling to have given Judgment of Death upon you I shall sum up all with the sense of the present House of Commons upon this whole proceeding which take in this Vote Martis 11th die Junij 1689. Resolved That the Prosecution of Titus Otes upon two Indictments for Perjury in the Court of King's Bench was a design to stifle the Popish Plot and that the Verdicts given thereupon were corrupt and that the Judgments given thereupon were cruel and illegal Notes upon the Tryal of Nathaniel Reading Esq for attempting to stifle the King's Evidence as to the horrid Popish Plot upon Wednesday the 24th of April 1679. before the Lord Chief Justice North c. THe Conspirators against our Religion Laws and Liberties being struck with astonishment and the Imprisoned and Impeached Traytors with no small Terror at the most providential and happy accession of Captain William Bedloe's Testimony to the discovery made by Dr Otes of the hellish Popish Plot in which he had stood single much discouraged we do quickly find their thoughts at work how to remove this newly acquired Witness Their way of taking off Sr Edmundbury Godfrey having so highly dis-served their Cause that is not to be again practised therefore the resolution taken in the present case is to tamper with and buy off Captain Bedloe they pitched upon Mr Reading to carry on this Intrigue whose parts and principles did very well qualifie him for such an undertaking but Mr Bedloe being above the reach of very powerful Temptations he very honestly detected the villainous Attempts upon him and the Suborner was brought to Justice as follows The Indictment sets forth the Plot against the King the Government and the Protestant Religion and that Colman Ireland and Grove were tryed condemned and executed for the same That several Lords viz. the Earl of Powis Lord Viscount Stafford Lord Bellasis Lord Arundel of Wardour Lord Petre and also Sr Henry Titchbourn stand impeached of the said Treason That Reading well knowing these things and to obstruct and stifle them and to retard the prosecution of Justice against the Lord Powis Stafford Bellasis Petre and Sr Henry Titchbourn did on their part the 29th of March last solicit suborn and endeavour to perswade Mr VVilliam Bedlooe whom he knew to have given Information of those Treasons against the said Persons to lessen stifle and not to give in evidence the full truth against them and to give such evidence as he should direct and to that purpose did give him fifty six Guineas and promised him other great Rewards to the hindrance and suppression of Justice The Jury were these Sr John Cutler Thomas Cass Joshua Galliard Rains. Waterhouse Edw. Willford Mathew Bateman Tho. Henslow Walter Moil Thomas Earsby
into the bargain but that Mr Justice Pemberton checkt it by holding up his hands in Admiration this persons Crime was the publishing a Book called An Appeal from the Country to the City in which this passage was contained We in the Country have done our parts in chusing good Members for Parliament but if they must be Dissolved or Prorogued when-ever they come to redress the Grievances of the Subject we may be pittied not blamed if the Plot takes effect as in all probability it will Our Parliaments are not then to be condemned for their not being suffered to sit occasioned it But now when we come to Judgments for Misdemeaners on the other side We shall perceive great Compassion and Mercy appearing in that Court indeed Reading who was Convicted for the first attempt upon the King's-Witnesses was adjudged to pay 1000 l. to be Pilloried and Imprisoned for a year and one would have thought that more severe Judgments would have past upon such as should dare to repeat the same Crimes after such an Example but we see the contrary About six Months afterwards Knox and Lane being Convicted of the same Offence accompanied with much blacker Circumstances Knox the principal was only Fined 200 Marks and condemned to a years Imprisonment and to be bound to the good Behaviour for three years And Lane Fined 1â—… Marks and adjudged to stand once in the Pillory and to be Imprisoned a year And now in the Case before us Mr Tasborough a Gentleman of a good Estate who had treated about so great a Villany in the name of the Duke of York was only Fined 100 l. And Mrs Price 200 l. But who can admire at this notorious departure from the rules of Justice and Equality in the assessing of Fines that remembers that the Chief Justice Scroggs did in this very Term declare in open Court in the Case of Dr Jessop a very honest and worthy Protestant of Norfolk that he would have regard to Persons and their Principles in imposing of Fines and would set a Fine of 500 l. on one person for the same offence for which he would not Fine another 100 l. And accordingly Fined Dr Jessop 100 l. for reporting false News as they called it and at the same time Fined the Doctor 's Author of that News a right Tory no doubt only five Marks Now surely will the Reader say this Jessop was undoubtedly a very naughty Man but to undeceive him I can affirm he is as true a Church of England Man as can be found and the bad principle which made him to be thus marked was that he was an avowed Enemy to Popery and true to the Liberties of England and did upon every occasion exert himself to a degree hardly to be equalled by any Gentleman of Norfolk for the chusing deserving men for Knights of the shire and particularly for Sr John Hobart then whom none ever deserved better of that County and whose name will always be remembred there with great Honour For this extravagant Partiality and Injustice in imposing Fines the Court of Kings-Bench was deservedly marked with this Vote of the House of Commons December the 23 d 1680 Resolved That the Court of King's Bench in the Imposition of Fines on Offenders of late years hath acted Arbitrarily Illegally and Partially Favouring Papists and persons Popishly affected and excessively Oppressing Protestants Reflections upon the Proceedings in the Old Baily before the Lord Chief Justices Pemberton and North. November 24 1681. upon an Indictment for High Treason framed against the Right Honourable Anthony Earl of Shaftesbury for conspiring the Death of the King and Subversion of the Government THe Names of the Grand-Jury returned by Sheriff Filkington and Sheriff Shute and who were Sworn upon that occasion were Sr Sam. Barnardiston John Morden Thomas Papillon John Dubois Charles Herle Edward Rudge Humphrey Edwm John Morris Edmund Harrison Joseph VVright John Cox Thomas Parker Leonard Robinson Thomas Shepherd John Flavel Michael Godfrey Joseph Richarson VVilliam Empson Andrew Kendrick John Lane and John Hall. A sort of people called Tories wedded to their own blindness having loudly clamoured of this great Jury I shall here add the names of those who were returned upon the same Pannel Alderman Ellis Mr Mellish Mr Tho. Gardener Samuel Swinnock Mr Ben. Godfrey Mr John Pollexfen Mr John Smith Mr John Gardener Mr Peter Delence Mr Peter Hubland Mr William Ashurst Mr John Deagle Mr Thomas Western Mr Bonnel Mr Gabriel Wheatley Mr Tho. Carpenter Mr L. Baskervile Mr George Marwood Mr John Smith And now let all who know the City of London judge whether a more substantial Pannel in every respect was ever returned to serve at the Old-Bailey The King's Council for the management of this Intrigue were The Attorney General Sr Francis Wythens the Abhorrer of Parliaments And Mr Saunders afterwards the Quo Warranto Lord Chief Justice Mr Graham the Solicitor of all the late Sham Plots upon Protestants and pay-master of corrupt Juries and perjured Witnesses solicited this Prosecution and hence took his first step to such Preferment as enabled him to give Eight or ten thousand Pounds with a Daughter 'T is to be lamented that he hath lived to this day without further Preferment in the way which at that time the then Lord Chancellor promised to honest Captain VVilkinson The magnified Evidence of this horrid Treason and that which the King's Council relying upon begun with was a Paper proved by Secretary Jenkins Mr Blaithwaite and Mr Gwin to have been found in the Earl's House of which such noise has been made in the World by the virulent Observator and the Popish News-Writers as well as from too many of our Pulpits that it may not be ungratful to the Reader to be here presented with the very words thereof which follow The Association WE the Knights c. finding to the grief of our Hearts the Popish Priests and Jesuites with the Papists and their Adherents and Abettors have for several years last past pursued a most pernicious and hellish Plot to root out the true Protestant Religion as a pestilent Heresie to take away the Life of our Gratious King to subvert our Laws and Liberties and to set up Arbitrary Power and Popery And it being notorious that they have been highly incouraged by the Countenance and Protection given and procured for them by James Duke of York and by their expectations of his succeeding to the Crown and that through Crafty Popish Councils his Designs have so far prevailed that he hath created many and great Dependants upon him by his bestowing Offices and Preferments both in Church and State. It appearing also to us that by his influence Mercenary Forces bave been levied and kept on foot for his secret Designs contrary to our Laws the Officers thereof having been named and appointed by him to the apparent hazard of his Majesties Person our Religion and Government if the Danger had not been timely fore-seen by several Parliaments and
and upon whom the following Vote passed in the House of Commons December the 24th 1680. Resolved Nemine contradicente That Richard Thompson Clerk has publickly defamed his Sacred Majesty preached Sedition Vilified the Reformation promoted Popery by asserting Popish Principles denying the Popish Plot and turning the same upon the Protestants and endeavoured to subvert the Liberty and Property of the Subject and the Rights and Priviledges of Parliament and that he is a Scandal Reproach to his Function Resolved That the said Richard Thompson be Impeached thereupon Men of this Kidney having made way for its belief We were from this time entertained with a Succession of sham Presbyterian-Plots the first thereof known by the name of the Meal-tub-Plot being happily discovered by Mr Dangerfield both Lords and Commons taking the Alarm did set themselves with double diligence to the Prosecution of the Popish-Plot and to find out ways for the Uniting Protestants and for Easing Dissenters so little had the opinion of a Presbyterian-Plot prevailed within their Walls and the Commons seeing a Dissolution at hand passed these Votes December the 15 th 1680. Resolved Nemine contradicente That a Bill be brought in for an Association of all his Majesties Protestant Subjects for the safety of his Majesties Person the defence of the Protestant Religion and the preservation of his Majesties Protestant Subjects against all Invasions and Oppositions whatsoever and for reventing the Duke of York or any Papist from succeeding to the Crown January the 7 th 1680. Resolved That it is the Opinion of this House that there is no security or safety for the Protestant Religion the King's Life or the well Constituted and Established Government of this Kingdom without passing a Bill for disabling James Duke of York to inherit the Imperial Crown of England and Ireland and to rely upon any other means or remedies without such a Bill is not only insufficient bâ—… dangerous January the 10 th 1680. Resolved That it is the Opinion of this House that the Prosecution of Protestant Dissenters upon the Penal Laws is at this time grievous to the Subjects a weakning of the Protestant Interest and encouragement to Popery and dangerous to the Peace of the Kingdom The next Moment after the passing this Vote the Parliament was prorogued for ten days and quickly after dissolved A new Parliament was forthwith Summoned to meet at Oxford the 21 st of March following but though the place was changed the Conspirators found there most of the Zealous Protestant Members of the Westminister Parliament who came thither animated to prosecute the Popish Plot the Exclusion of the Duke and the Uniting of Protestants by Addresses from those whom they represented whereof take an Instance To the Honourable Sr Samuel Barnardiston and Sr William Spring Baronets Knights of the Shire for the County of Suffolk Gentlemen WE the Freeholders of this County having chosen you our Representatives in the last Parliament in which We had satisfactory demonstration of your Zeal for the Protestant Religion of your Loyalty to his Majesties Person and Government and of your faithful Endeavours for the preservation of the Laws our Rights and Properties We now return you our most hearty Thanks and have Vnanimously chosen you to Represent this County at the Parliament to be holden at Oxford the 21 th of March next and though We have not the least distrust of your Wisdom to understand or of your Integrity and Resolution to maintain and promote our common Interest now in so great hazard yet We think it meet at this time of eminent danger to the King and Kingdom to recommend some things to your Care and particularly We do desire First That as hitherto you have so you will vigorously prosecute the execrable Popish Plot now more fully discovered and proved by the Tryal of William late Viscount Stafford Secondly That you will promote a Bill for Excluding James Duke of York and all Popish Successors from the Imperial Crown of this Realm as that which under God may probably be a present and effectual means for the preservation of his Majesties Life which God preserve the Protestant Religion an the well Established Government of this Kingdom Thirdly That you will endeavour the frequent Meeting of Parliaments and their sitting so long as it shall be requisite for the dispatch of those great Affairs for which they are convened as that which is our only Bulwark against Arbitrary Power Fourthly That you will endeavour an happy and necessary Vnion amongst all his Majesties Protestant Subjects by promoting those several good Bills which were to that end before the last Parliament And that till these things be obtained which We conceive necessary even to the Being of this Nation you will not consent to bring any Charge upon our Estates And We do assure you that We will stand by you with our Lives and Fortunes in prosecâ—…ion of the good Ends before recited This Parliament beginning where the former left and being found to adhere unalterably to the Resolution of rooting out the Plot and of Excluding the Duke as the only adequate remedy for all the threatning Evils to the Kingdom they were after a very few days Sitting upon the sudden Dissolved and followed into their own Countries with a Declaration bearing date April the 8 th 1681 pretending to set forth the â—…ses and Reasâ—… that moved the â—…ng to Dissolve that and the preceedâ—… Parliament bâ—…cally designed to expose and blacken those worthy Patriots and to that end it was ordered to be read in all Churches and Chappels throughout the Kingdom which was readily obeyed To wheadle the Nation till it might be noosed that Declaration according to the mode of that Reign spoke and promised fare tho the train was then laid to blow up our Religion Laws and Liberties It exhorted us that the restless malice of Ill Men who were labouring to poison the People might not perswade us that the King did intend to lay aside the use of Parliaments and declared that no Irregularities in Parliaments should ever make him out of love with Parliaments And that he resolved by the Blessing of God to have frequent Parliaments and both in and out of Parliament to use his utmost Endeavours to extirpate he means Establish Popery †Note this was after his Fathers Copy who by a Declaration in the year 1626. to justifie his Arbitrary way of Leveing Money by way of Loane said that his Occasions would not give leave for the calling a Parliament but assured his People that he intended not to serve himself by such ways to the abolishing of Parliaments and yet the Nation saw not a Parliament from the 3 d to the 16 th year of that Reign vide Rushworth's Collections first Part page 418. This Royal Grace or rather Slander upon one of the three Estates was not only proclaimed from the Readers Desks but was promulgated from both Pulpit and Press five days after the emiting this Declaration
Lane and had promised great Rewards to them Then the Cause was opened by that most incomparable Person the honour of the Law old Sr John Maynard now first Lord Commissioner of the great Seal whose Ability Integrity and Desert have kept him from a Seat upon the Benches of Westminster till about the eighty eighth Year of his Age when Heaven set the Law free he spoke to this effect This Cause is of great consequence there hath been an horrid and abominable Conspiracy against the King the Nation our Religion and the Law The first discovery of this Conspiracy came from a single Person who stood single and discouraged a long time and there were endeavours to discourage his further discovery when it stood so Sr Edmundbury Godfrey having taken his Examination then the endeavour was to suppress it and that by no less a wickedness then the barbarous Murder of that honest Gentleman that being accomplished they strived to baffle and defame him when dead All this while he stood single it fell out by the mercy of God that Bedloe made a further discovery and publick Justice has gone upon it Then they attempted to corrupt his Testimony with Bribes and Rewards and Reading who transacted it is attainted of it scelere tutandum est scelus Having gone all these ways they return again to see if they can disgrace and baffle the Evidence of Otes and Bedloe by scandalizing them with foul offences especially Dr Otes and that was thus Knox tampered with Lane a Servant to Otes to accuse him of the Horrid Sin of Sodomy In order to it there were Letters wrote by Osborne who is run away but contrived by Knox. It happens in this case as it did long ago as the Historian told us multi ob stultitiam non put abant multi ob ignorantiam non videbant multi ob pravitatem non credebant et non credendo conjurationem adjuvabant To this Sr Creswell Levens the King's Attorney-General added This is a counter-part of Mr Reading 's Case only it seems in this to differ that it exceeds the Original In the proceeding upon the cause it was proved that Lane upon his first coming to Dr Otes in November 1678 had a design to accuse him as he afterward did of Sodomy a Crime above the common standard of Villanies That he declared whilst he was with the Doctor that he hoped in a short time to get 1000 l. That Lane sent for Sr William Waller that he might confess the whole Contrivance to him declaring that he was pricked in Conscience for the false Oaths he had taken That Lane and Osborne had confessed before a Committee of the House of Lords and also before Sr William Waller and Justice Warcup that they were suborned by Knox to swear falsly against Dr Otes and Mr Bedloe and that he had given them money to do it That Knox made Lane and Osborne swear Secrecy and to stand fast to the Instructions he had given them That he went to the Sugar-Loaf in Pickadilly and took Lodgings for them and lay there with them and promised them Money and Preferment and told Lane that he need not doubt but the Lords in the Tower would acknowledge their Kindness That Lane and Osborne said they were going from Dr Otes that they were sworn Brothers if the one did go the other would and they should get Preferment and have 100 l. per annum and 500 l. in Money As to Knox his endeavours to blast the Testimony of Dr Otes and Mr Bedloe it was proved That Knox endeavour'd to suborn H. Wiggins to accuse Mr Bedloe his Master That he proposed to Thurston a Servant to Dr Otes to be very kind to him if he could find any thing to Swear against his Master That Knox to invite VViggins to betray and accuse Mr Bedloe said The King knows Otes and Bedloe to be great Rogues and when he has got what he can out of them he will hang them up That when Knox Lane and Osborne were Prisoners in the Gate-house for this contrivance Knox offered the Vnder-Keeper a Reward to allow him to correspond by Letters with Lane and gave him three half Crowns desiring him to speak to Lane to stand fast to him and then they should be two against one for he fear'd Osborne had betrayed them about the business of Dr Otes That Knox and Lane and Osborne went to Justice Dewy and Knox told him he was advised to come to him to take an Information against Dr Otes and that they went to Justice Cheyney upon the same errand That Lane had been kept the last Summer at the Lord Powis his house had 10 s. per week allowed him That Knox was to have 30 or 40 l. to carry on the business and that Knox Osborne and Lane were to be rewarded by the Lords in the Tower for their evidence against Dr Otes and Mr Bedloe That Lane being taken Knox sent for Osborne and carried him in a Coach to White Fryers That the Papers relating to the Conspiracy were delivered by Knox to Dangerfield and went about to the Lords in the Tower and afterwards to Nevil alias Paine and were by him amended and then delivered to Knox again The Case appearing so very clear upon the Evidence the Jury without going from the Bar found the Defendants guilty Whereupon they received this merciful Sentence Knox the principal who is now at this day in a better station at Court than ever he was in his Life or could ever have hoped for Fined two hundred Marks to be Imprisoned a year and to be bound to the good behaviour for three years Lane fined one hundred Markâ— to stand once in the Pillory and to be Imprisoned a Year Notes upon the Tryal of John Tasborough and Ann Price for Subornation of Perjury in endeavouring to perswade Mr Stephen Dugdale to retract and deny his Evidence about the Popish Plot with an intent to stifle the further Prosecution of the same At the Kings Bench upon the third of February 1679 before Sr William Scroggs Sr Thomas Jones Sr William Dolben and Sr Francis Pemberton Judges of that Court. The Jury were Thomas Harriot Tho. Johnson Char. Vmphrerile Tho. Earsby Richard Pagget John Greene Edward Willford Richard Bull Joseph Ratclaffe Richard Cooper James Supple George Read. THe suborning attempt of Knox Lane was succeeded by another of the like nature carried on by two Popish Engines Mr Tasborough and Mrs Price which being likewise happily detected they were prosecuted as follows The Indictment was to this effect That Whitebread Harcourt and Langhorne and others were convicted and attainted for Treason and that Dugdale had been a material Evidence against them and the Defendants knowing this and contriving to stifle the evidence of those Treasons did before Harcourts Tryal suborn and endeavour to perswade Dugdale not to give evidence against him and after the Tryal solicited him to retract the Evidence he had given and promised him large Rewards
withal That they complained they were in Poverty They confessed they were tempted to come over to swear against Protestants and now the Lord knows they have closed with it and they begin with me There is never a Man that has sworn against me but has been sufficiently confuted by Persons of Integrity Honesty Men of Principles and Men of Religion such as make Conscience of what they say I have been Lover of the Church of England I never had a prejudice against any Man in the Church in my Life but such as have made it their business to promote the Interest of the Papists and such there are amongst them who divide the Protestants and allow none to be true Protestants but those that are within the Church of England established by Law I have been an hearty Man against the Papists and for Parliaments the Bulwark of our Liberty I have ever since the discovery of the Plot endeavoured with all my Heart and all my Power to come to the very bottom of it These Men that swear against me used to follow me and would say that they came to save our Lives and yet We let them want Bread and the Argument was so fair that I thought it unreasonable to see them starve The Prisoner afterwards speaking to the Judges said My Life and your Souls lie at stake to do me Justice My Witnesses have spoken materially to contradict what has been said against me to prove that this was done for Money and that every one of them have confessed they were hired to it and that they did it for a Livelyhood And Haynes said It was a good Trade Damn him he would do any thing for Money I need insist upon this no further The whole Nation is sensible what is doing and what this does signifie They have begun with me in order to the making of a Presbyterian Plot which they would carry on to stifle the Noise of the Popish Plot and this is not the first the second nor the tenth time that they have been at this Game how many Shams have they endeavoured to raise I only desire the Jury to take all into their serious consideration I expect a Storm of Thunder from the learned Counsel to fall upon me and I must defend my self without Counsel I know not whether it be the practise in any other Nation but certainly 't is hard measure that I being illiterate and ignorant in the Law must stand here all day They being many and taking all advantages against me and I a Single Person and not able to use one means or another either of writing or speaking Then applying to the Jury after a solemn Protestation of his Innocence said I beseech you be not frightned nor flattered you are to acquit me or condemn me and my Blood will be required at your Hands Now comes Mr Solicitor to bestow his Rhetorick upon the Prisoner saying Here has been a great deal of time spent and truly I think for no other Reason but to divert from the matter before you and that you might forget the Evidence and therefore to refresh your Memories I shall repeat it The Fact charged upon the Prisoner is a design to Kill the King the manifestation of that design is by preparing Armes to that purpose and by coming down to seize the King here the proof of it has been by Witnesses that I think by and by you will have no Objections against Then having recounted the Stories of the Witnesses he proceeds thus The Objection made to this proof by the Prisoner is That this is a Popish design to raise a new Plot and cast it upon the Protestants And that these Witnesses are now to deny all the Evidence they have given of the Popish Plot This is that he would perswade you to believe but I think it will be impossible for you to have such a Thought For what are the Evidence that have proved this Men of Credit that have been Evidences against the Popish Plotters Men that still stand to the Evidence they have given And yet forsooth these Men are going about to stifle this Plot. Gentlemen These are the Men the whole Nation has given Credit to My Lord Stafford dyed upon the Credit of these Men These are the Witnesses Gentlemen that this Man thinks ought to be blown off with that srivolous Objection that they are persons he would have you believe Who are guilty of a design to throw the Plot upon the Protestants Now Gentlemen If Colledge have all this while under the name of a Protestant acted the part of a Papist I may say he is not that good Protestant he pretends to be I must do him right and repeat the Evidence he hath given against our Witnesses Mr Hickman says he over-heard Haynes say it was his Trade to Swear and he must get Money by it Lun says that Haynes declared the same thing to him Whaley says that Haynes stole a Silver Tankard but he was never prosecuted for it I think the Nature of this Evidence hath not that weight as to take off the Credit of what this Man hath said upon his Oath especially being backt with the Evidence of Dugdale Smtyh and Turbervile whose credit has not been impeached Indeed Dr Otes is produced against them and he must vilifie their Credit whose Testimony at first of the Popish Plot received Credit by being seconded by these Men A thing much more monstrous was put in practice by the King's Council when they produced the very persons â—…om Dr Otes had charged with the Popish Plot to coâ—vict him of Perjury in the Evidence which he gave of their Plot. It is a strange thing that this Man comes now to vilifie the Testimony of those who have been Credited by the whole Kingdom This looks as if the Doctor were again returning to St Omers There are two Witnesses Bolron and Mowbray who testifie That Smyth would have suborned them to swear against Sr John Brookes But I think I need say no more to these Men but only to desire you to weigh their Credit They have I confess been evidence against several that have been accused of the Popish Plot but they have been so unfortunate that they were never yet believed though they have been sworn in their own Country Note This by the way was not true for at Summer Assizes at York in 1680 Thwyng was convicted of the Plot and afterwards executed and that upon the Testimony of these very men Bolron and Mowbray in their own Country Mr Solicitor then closes thus I think Gentlemen this is the substance of what has been offered against the King's Witnesses except that of Mr Everard who says something against Haynes that he should say he swore for self-preservation And against Mr Smyth he says that he heard him say he did not know of any Presbyterian Plot. By these things And by a great many others which had slip'd the Memory of the Solicitor and also of the Chief
Justice he hath endeavoured to take off the credit of our Witnesses and he would have you believe that he is a very good Protestant though he does the Papists work I think it a great piece of arrogance for him to take upon him the Title of a Protestant when he hath abused that title by such unsuitable Practices I cannot but reflect upon the condition of this Man whose onely hope is that you should now forget your selves and become as ill as he is But as that cannot be presumed so I shall not need to say any more to you After the making of very long Speeches to the Jury by Sr George Jeffryes and also by the Lord Chief Justice North to the same effect with the Solicitor's The Prisoner minded the Lord Chief Justice that he had omitted to mind the Jury of several material things evidenced for him but his Lordship answered That he had repeated to them as much as he could remember And so the Jury having been for a short time sent out and returning it being about three in the Morning they brought in the Prisoner Guilty The Lord Chief Justice North coming to pronounce Sentence said I think the Court were all very well satisfied with the Verdict and the Jury did according to Justice and Right I thought it was a Case that as you made your own defence small proof would serve the turn to make any one believe you Guilty and so he was sentenced to dye as a Traytor At the place of Execution upon the 31st of August 1681. he behaved himself with great Courage and Constancy and expressed himself to this effect He professed in the presence of the Living God That he was so far from being Guilty of those Treasons falsly sworn against him by the wretched and mercenary Men Dugdale Turbervile Smyth and Haynes that he never spoke so much as one single word of those Treasons to them or either of them or ever heard them spoke till sworn in the Court. He declared that Haynes had discovered to him that the Parliament was to be destroyed at Oxford and that Fitz. Gerald and his party had a design to murder the Earl of Shaftesbury and that they did endeavour to bring Macnamar over and said that then it would be well with them And they would not be long before they had Shaftesbury's Life That as for what Arms he and others had they were for their own defence in case the Papists should make any attempt by way of Massacre He took it upon his Death that he was never engaged in any manner of Plot or Conspiracy against the King the Laws or Government or knew of any except that of the Papists That if it had been true that he was to have seized the King he knew not of so much as one single Person that was or would have stood by him in that attempt That Masters was unjust in what he swore in omitting the material part of the discourse about the Parliament of 1640 for when Masters cursed them and the last Westminster-Parliament and charged the Parliament of 1640 with beginning the War and cutting off the King's Head he denyed both and told Masters that the Papists begun that War and that the death of the King was the fatal consequence of it That Sr William Jennings also did him wrong for his words were that he had lost the first Blood for the Parliament and wish'd it might be the last That he was reported to be a Papist but he declared he detested Popery and that he had lived and dyed a Protestant That Secretary Jenkins my Lord Killingworth and Mr Seymour when they committed him did interrogate him to many things that he should be privy to against the King Mr Sevmour saying that Colledge did know the Lord of Shaftesbury the Lord Howard and Mr Ferguson were also engaged but that he answered were it to save his Life he could not accuse a Man of them nor any other Person whatsoever That upon the 23d of August the Messenger who brought him the message of his Death told him he might save his Life if he would confess who was the Cause of his coming to Oxford and upon what account And that he answered him that he came voluntarily of himself rode his own Horse spent his own Money and neither was invited nor had dependency on any Person whatsoever and had only one Case of Pistols and a Sword and that had the Papists offered to have destroyed the Parliament as was sworn they would that he was there to have lived and dyed with them That when he had said this to the Messenger though the very truth he found it was not that he wanted and so left him with a Curse He concluded I dye by the Hands of the Enemies of the great God his Christ his Servants his Gospel my Country to which I willingly submit and earnestly pray mine may be the last Protestants Blood that murdering Church of Rome may shed in Christendom And that my Death may be a far greater Blow to their Bloody Cause than I either have or could have been by my Life The Lord God Almighty save England from Popery and Slavery bless the City of London and unite all good Protestants in the Nation Amen Amen Notes upon the Tryal of Nathaniel Thompson the Popish Printer William Paine Brother of the famous Nevil Paine and John Farwell upon the 20 th of June 1682. before the Lord Chief Justice Pemberton upon an Information for Writing and Publishing Libels importing that Sr Edmundbury Godfry Murdered himself THe Conspirators from the very first discovery resolved that the Popish Plot should be turned to a Presbyterian Plot pursuant thereto the credit of the Evidence especially from the time of the Dissolution of the Oxford-Parliament in the beginning of the year 1681. had been with matchless Impudence and Virulence traduced and run down by the scriblings of L'Estrange and of Heraclitus ridens and the Intelligences of this Thompson now before us so that by this time a multitude were infected with the poison of their Works and seduced into a belief that the Popish Plot was a Sham nothing but a thing raised by the Protestants against the Papists however it still remained upon them to wipe off the Blood of that Martyr the worthy Sr Edmundbury Godfry which was more then One Thousand Witnesses against them and now they judging matters to be ripened for it with effronted fore-Heads set to the Work as will appear by what follows The Information against these notorious Criminals Thompson Paine and Farwell was to this effect That they well knowing that Green Berry and Hill were Convicted Attainted and Exâ—…uted for the Murther of Sr Edmundbury Godfry and that Prance Bedloe Brown Curtis Skillarne and Cambridge were Witnesses for the King against them and that by the Coroners Inquest taken upon view of the Body it was found that he was Strangled and Choaked they to subvert and elude the due course of
Law and to defame the Justice of the Kingdom and to render as well the Witnesses as the Coroner contemptible and to deter others from detecting the Designs of Papists and to induce a belief that Green Berry and Hill were unjustly Executed and that Sr Edmundbury Godfry was Felo de se they did most impiously Compose and cause to be Printed and Published two false Scandalous and Defamatory Libels entituled Letters to Mr Miles Prance and three other Scandalous Libels called the Loyal Protestant and true Domestick Intelligence and did by these Libels suggest that Sr Edmundbury Godfry was Felo de se and did reflect on every of the said Witnesses as if they had contradicted themselves and Insinuate that the Coroner's-Jury did at first declare that he was Felo de se and that the Coroner used much Art and Skill to procure their Verdict to the contrary The Jury which tryed this Cause were Peter Houblon John Ellis William Barret Joshua Brooks Gervas Byfeild Jonathan Lee George Widdows William Sambrooke William Jacomb John Delinee Samuel Bayly and Samuel Howard The Counsel for the King were Mr Serjeant Maynard Mr Solicitor General Sr Francis Winnington Mr Williams Mr Thompson Mr Saunders and Mr Gooding Council for Paine Mr Yalden for Thompson Mr Osborne for Farwell Mr Thompson having opened the Indictment Mr Serjeant Maynard spoke to the Crime and declared it to be as impudent a thing as ever was done in that it scandalized the publick Justice of the Nation undertook to vindicate the Murtherers and to accuse the Proceedings of the Nation and then calling the Witnesses Sr John Nicholas Sr Philip Loyd and Mr Bridgman Clerks of the Council proved that the two Letters set forth in the Information were shewed to the Defendants at the Council and that Thompson owned the Printing both of them and that Farwell owned the carrying the first and Paine the carrying the second to Thompson After reading these Letters in Court Thompson's Intelligence of the 17 th of March 1681 was produced wherein it is contained as follows There is not in the said Letter meaning the said first Letter the least Item or Circumstance but what will be by undeniable Evidence made out to be Truth so that Mr Prance having not as yet vouchsafed an Answer to that Letter he will speedily receive a further Letter relating to that Murther wherein the further truth will be set forth and other Circumstances set out Another of those Intelligences of March 11 th 1681. given in Evidence ran thus Whereas Dick Janeway in this days Mercury promises an Answer to the late Letter to Mr Prance c. This is to give him and all the World notice that such an Answer is impatiently expected by the Author of that Letter who questions not but to prove every tittle of that Letter to the satisfaction of all Mankind and then it proceeds to challenge the Lord Mayor Aldermen and Common-Council to inspect the truth of that Letter and says That then the Fraud and Blindness put upon the World in Relation to the Murther of Sr Edmundbury Godfry will be manifestly proved A third of these Intelligences took a further step glorying in an imagined victory in this matter for it sayes Last Wednesday Nathaniel Thompson upon Summons appeared before the Lords of the Council about the Letters to Mr Prance concerning the death of Sr Edmunbury Godfry where he justified the matter and produced the Authors who are ready to prove by undeniable and sub stantial Witnesses c. that every tittle and jot a of these Letters are true And after adds Mr Thompson and the Gentlemen his Friends are to attend the next Wednesday at Council where they do not doubt but that honourable Board will put them into a Method to prove the whole or any particular which their Honours in their great Wisdom shall think convenient to be brought to the Test or Examination An honest English-man can never better express his admiration and detestation of the transcendent impudence of these vile Miscreants then in the Language of the late famous Baron of Wem upon another occasion with a small alteration of Words Good God! whither were we runing when many easie People were so strangely wrought upon by these Impostors and when the villainous and black Designs of some evil Instruments among us were so powerfully abetted and countenanced that they were arrived to this degree of assurance that they could beguile and delude not only some of the Shepherds of our Church of England with their silly innocent Flocks but even the King and his Privy-Council into the belief of so horrid a falshood and that at a time when not a hidden but a deeply contrived and detected Treason was carryed on amongst us for extirpating our Religion termed the Northern Heresie our Laws and Liberties The Conspirators had a fair Game of it whilst these Fellows were believed and they needed no other means to compleat their design I cannot but say my Blood does curdle and my Spirits are raised to see fellows so impudent as to brazen it out as these monstrous Villains do the blackness of their Souls the baseness of their Actions ought to be lookt upon with such horror and detestation as to think them unworthy any longer to tread upon the face of God's Earth But to return to the matter in hand from which I have digressed It being as aforesaid made out that the Defendants had published that what was testified against the Murderers of Sr Edmundbury Godfry was a lye Mr Saunders and Mr Gooding Counsel for Paine declared it was a rash and unadvised Act but not out of Malice and that he was sorry for what he had done and had offered to give any Satisfaction To whom the Lord Chief Justice replyed To me he said he would make it out by five hundred Witnesses they would make it as plain as the day and Counsellor Thompson added since the last time that was appointed for the Tryal they have printed that they would prove it by sixty Witnesses and were very sorry it did not come on Mr Yalden Counsel for Thompson said that he thought his Client was unfortunately drawn into the business by Paine and Farwell who turn all upon him now Mr Osborne Counsel for Farwell said It was a foolish thing to do as he had done but that his Client said he had several Witnesses who being called it was manifest that Farwell designed to have even then raised a doubt whether Sr Edmundbury Godfry was murthered or not but it appeared that of the eleven or twelve Witnesses he called there was not one but was as much against him as could be for they did plainly evince it that Sr Edmundbury Godfry was Killed and that by Strangling and so confirmed the evidence given against Green Berry and Hill. It being thus manifested that this was a cursed combination to affront the publick justice of the Nation and that done to the end to perswade the World there
General thunders thus against him The Prisoner is indicted of the highest Crimes the conspiring the King's Death and the overthrow of the Monarchy There is no English-man but does believe that for several years a Design was laid and to that end secret Instructions were made use of and Libels spread to perswade the People that the King was introducing Arbitrary Power Ay so he was and so were his Judges and Council at Law that he subverted their Rights and Liberties c. a sad truth They endeavoured to make the World believe the King was a Papist So they did and his Dear and Royal Brother cleared up that Point soon after his Death And then there was a Design of an open Rising This Gentleman's Head and Heart was entire in this Service he was at this very time preparing a most Seditious and Trayterous Libel To perswade the People that it is Lawful nay that they have a Right to set aside their Prince in case it appears that he hath broken the Trust laid upon him by the People He uses great Reason in the Case That the Power of the Prince is Originally in the People and that the King's Power was derived from the People upon Trust most horrid Heresie and they might assume the Original Power they had conferred c. After this Harangue to pre-possess the Jury Mr West Col. Romsey and Keeling were called and told long Stories of Consultations Plots and Resolutions without offering one Word of Evidence against Colonel Sidney Then the Lord Howard told his long History of the Plot that being ended They gave in Evidence some scraps of a Manuscript found in the Colonel's Study and read three or four Paragraphs to the judicious Jury whereof I shall here give the Reader a touch When Pride had changed Nebuchadnezar into a Beast what should perswade the Assyrians not to drive him out amongst Beasts until God had restored unto him the Heart of a Man When Tarquin had turned the Legal Monarchy of Rome into a most abominable Tyranny Why should they not abolish it And when the Protestants of the Low-Countries were so grievously oppressed by the Power of Spain under the Proud Cruel and Savage Conduct of the Duke of Alva Why should they not make use of all the means that God hath put into their Hands for their Deliverance Let any Man who sees the present State of the Provinces that then united themselves judge whether it is better for them to be as they are or in the condition into which his Fury would have reduced them unless they had to please him renounced God and their Religion Our Author may say They ought to have suffered The King of Spain by their Resistance lost those Countries and that they ought not to have been Judges in their own Case To which I Answer That by resisting they laid the Foundation of many Churches that have produced multitudes of Men Eminent in Gifts and Graces and Established a most glorious and happy Common-Wealth that hath been since its first beginning the strongest Pillar of the Protestant Cause now in the World and a place of Refuge unto those who in all Parts of Europe have been oppressed for the Name of Christ Whereas otherwise they had Slavishly and I think I may say Wickedly as well as Foolishly suffered themselves to be Butchered they had left those Provinces under the Power of Anti-Christ where the Name of God is no otherwise known than to be Blasphemed If the King of Spain had desired to keep his Subjects He should have Governed them with more Justice and Mercy When contrary to all Laws both Humane and Divine He seeks to destroy those He ought to have preserved He can blame none but himself if they deliver themselves from his Tyranny And when the matter is brought to that That he must not Reign or they over whom he would Reign must perish the matter is easily decided As if the Question had been asked in the time of Nero or Domitian whether they should be left at Liberty to destroy the best part of the World as they endeavoured to do or it should be rescued by their Destruction And as for the Peoples being Judges in their own Case it is plain they ought to be the only Judges because it is their own and only concerns themselves The general Revolt of a Nation from its own Magistrates can never be called Rebellion The Papers being read Mr Solicitor doubting surely the Capacity of the intelligent Jury to judge of these Notions upon the first hearing said that no time was mis-spent to make things clear and that the Jury might have the Words read again if they had a mind to it and he repeated that offer to them but the Gentlemen better understanding the work of the day then the Treatise did not desire a repetition of the Words The Prisoner here said They have proved a Paper found in my Study of Domitian and Nero that is compassing the death of the King is it Whatever my Lord Howard is of whom I have enough to say by and by he is but one Witness and there ought to be two Witnesses to the same thing Let my Lord Howard reconcile what he has said now with what he said at my Lord Russell's Tryal if he pleases there he swore he said all he could and now he has got I know not how many things that never were spoken of there He hath accused himself of divers Treasons and is under the terror of punishment for them and would get his own Indempnity by destroying others He owes me a great sum of Money and when I should take the advantage of the forfeit of his Mortgage he finds a way to have me laid up in the Tower this is a point of great cunning at once to get his Pardon and save his Money He was desirous to go further and would have got my Servants to put my Plate and Goods into his hands He made affirmations in the presence of God that I was innocent in his opinion and he was confident of it I know in my Lord Russell's Case Dr Burnet testified something like this and when my Lord Howard came to answer it he said he was to face it out Now he did face it out bravely against God but was very timerous of Man I am to give an account of these Papers which they would piece and patch to my Lord Howard's discourse and by a strange kind of construction and imagination make to have relation to this PLOT as they call it I know of none They offer no proof but similitude of Hands Some years ago the Lady Car was indicted of Perjury and as evidence some Letters of hers were produced that were contrary to what she swore in Chancery and it was proved to be like her hand but Chief Justice Keeling directed the Jury that this was the smallest and least of proofs in Civil Causes but in Criminal it was none at all So that my Lord
Howard's Testimony is single As to the Consult he talks of What could six Men do Can my Lord Howard raise five Men by his credit By his Purse For my part I knew not where to raise five Men. That such Men as We are that have no Followers should undertake so vast a design is very unlikely And this great design thus carried on had neither Officers nor Souldiers no Place no Time no Money for it This is a pritty Cabal and a very deep maintaining of the Plot. Then the Prisoner called the Earl of Anglesey the Earl of Clare Capt Philip Howard Dr Burnet Mr Joseph Ducas Lord Paget and Mr Edward Howard who all testified that the Lord Howard had frequently with great asseverations and calling God to Witness affirmed that he knew of no Plot and that he was confident of Colonel Sidney's Innocence Mr Blake proved that my Lord Howard told him that he could not get his Pardon till he had past the drudgery of Swearing Mr Ducas Grace Tracy and Elizabeth Penwick proved that the Lord Howard came to the Colonel's House and being told that he was taken away to the Tower for the Plot He took God to witness he knew nothing of it and believed the Colonel did not and he then desired that the Colonel's Plate and Goods might be sent to his House to be secured Then Mr Wharton offered to imitate those Sheets of paper so that they should not know which was which but the Court did not regard it Now Mr Solicitor in his wonted luxuriant way of talking Men to Death falls upon the Prisoner and jumbles things thus together in his Address to the Jury Gentlemen We go about to prove the compassing and imagining the Death of the King by the Prisoner's consulting how to raise Armes and by plain matter in writing under his hand where he does affirm it is lawful to take away and destroy the King A strange Suggestion no way warranted by the reading the Papers and he then proceeds in the same way to insinuate many things against the Prisoner which no way affected nor reached him by the Evidence given He then comes to the Papers and sayes Compassing and imagining the Death of the King is the Act of the mind and when once there is an Overt Act that is a thing that manifests such intention Then the Law takes hold of it Now after this Evidence which the Reader will remember was only the Lord Howard's Swearing I think no Man will doubt whether it was in the heart of the Prisoner to destroy the King here is an avowed principle of Rebellion Establisht upon the strongest reason he has to back it Gentlemen speaking to the Carpenter and his Fellows most competent Judges of such a Book This with the other Evidence that has been given will be sufficient to prove his compassing the Death of the King This Book is another and more than two Witnesses against him you have heard one Witness prove it positively to you that he consulted to rise in Arms against the King and here is his own Book says it is lawful to rise in Arms if the King break his Trust and in effect he has said the King has broken his Trust therefore this will be a sufficient demonstration what the imagination of the Heart of this Man was that it was nothing but the Destruction of the King and of the Government Some Men may by passion be transported into such an offence in them it is less dangerous but it is this Gentleman's principle Gentlemen This is the more dangerons Conspiracy in this Man by how much the more it is rooted in him and how deep it is you hear when a Man shall write as his principle that it is lawful to depose Kings they breaking their Trust and that the Revolt of the whole Nation cannot be called Rebellion It will be a very sad * But late Experience refutes his Opinion and we now see 't is a very happy Case Case when People act this according to their Consciences and do all this for the good of the People as they would have it thought but this is the Principle of this Man We think We have plainly made it out that is was the Imagination of his heart to Destroy the King. Hereupon Colonel Sidney said My Lord We have had a long story I desire Mr Solicitor would not think it his Duty to take away Mens Lives any how My Lord Coke and Lord Hales were both of Opinion That the Overt Act of one Treason is not an Overt Act of another Hales saith Compassing by bare words is not an Overt Act Conspiring to levy VVar is no Overt Act. Then the Chief Justice concluded with a long Repetition of what he pretended had been given in Evidence and said that though some Judges had been of opinion that Words of themselves were not an Overt Act yet my Lord Hales nor my Lord Coke nor any other of the Sages of the Law ever questioned but that a Letter would be an Overt Act sufficient to prove a Man guilty of Treason for Scribere est Agere Gentlemen I must tell you that in Case there be but one Witness to prove a direct Treason and another to prove a circumstance that contributes to that Treason That will make two Witnesses to prove the Treason Here is a most trayterous Lybel if you believe that Colonel Sidney writ it No Man can doubt but it is a sufficient Evidence that he is guilty of Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King I must mind you that this Book contains all the Malice and Revenge and Treason that Mankind can be guilty of This is made use of by him to stir up the People to Rebellion yet by the way it was not so much as pretended that Colonel Sidney had published the Book or shown it to any Mortal So 't is not upon two but upon greater Evidence then two and twenty if you believe this Book was writ by him Next I must tell you upon I think a less Evidence the Lord Russel was Convicted and Executed An excellent Argument that having then tasted Noble Blood they must go on to drink their fill of it 't is to be lamented that such Miscreants have not been dismissed the World as the famous Scythian Queen Tomyris did the Persian Tyrant with a Satiate vos Sanguine quem sitistis Proditores Patriae et dedecus humani generis This Doctrine thus powerfully insinuated to the well disposed Jury a pack of meer Tools to eccho back the pleasure of the Judge procured a Guilty to be without difficulty brought in upon this Great and Noble Person It being hereupon demanded of him what he had to say why Judgment of Death should not be given against him He said that he had had no Tryal he was to be Tryed by his Country and he did not find his Country in the Jury that tryed him There were some of them that were not Freeholders and there is
neither Law nor President of any Man Tryed by a Jury in a County that were not Freeholders So he had had no Tryal at all and if so there could be no Judgment To this Jefferies replyed that he had had the Opinion of the Court in that matter and that they were unanimous in it And so they were in all murdering work at that day Colonel Sidney then said that there was nothing of Treason in the Words said to be written in the Papers if the nature of the thing were examined To which the Chief Justice retorted There is not a line in the Book scarce but what is Treason The Sentence being passed the Prisoner expressed himself in these Words Why then O Lord Sanctifie I beseech thee these my Sufferings unto me Sanctifie me through my Sufferings Sanctifie me through thy Truth Thy Word is Truth Impute not my Blood unto this Nation Impute it not unto the grand City through which I shall be led unto the place of Death Let not my Soul cry tho' it lies under the Altar make not Inquisition for my Blood or if innocent Blood must be expiated let thy Vengeance fall only upon the heads of those who knowingly and maliciously Persecute me for Righteousness sake Upon the 7th of December 1683. He was Beheaded upon Tower-Hill when he delivered to the Sheriffs Daniel Dashwood a paper the substance whereof is here presented to the Reader Men Brethren and Fathers Friends Country-men and Strangers We live in an Age that maketh Truth pass for Treason I dare not say any thing contrary to Truth and the * * Sheriff Daniel's c. Ears of those that are about me will probably be found too tender to hear it West Romsey and Keeling brought to prove the Plot said no more of me than that they did not know me The Lord Howard is too infamous by his Life and his many Perjuries not to be denyed or rather sworn by himseif to deserve mention and being a single Witness would be of no value though he had been of unblemished Credit or had not seen and confessed that the Crimes committed by him would be pardoned only for committing more This being laid aside the whole matter is reduced to the Papers said to be found in my Closet If I had been seen to write them the matter would not be much altered They plainly appear to relate unto a Treatise written long since in answer to Filmer's Book which is grounded upon wicked Principles equally pernicious to Magistrates and People If he might publish unto the World his Opinion that all Men are born under a necessity derived from the Laws of God and Nature to submit unto an absolute Kingly Government which could be restrained by no Law or Oath and that he that hath the Power hath the Right and the Persons and Estates of his Subjects must be indispensably subject to it I know not why I might not have published my opinion to the contrary without the breach of any Law. I might as freely as he publickly have declared my thoughts and the Reasons of my belief That Magistrates were set up for the good of Nations not Nations for the honour or glory of Magistrates That the Right and Power of Magistrates was that which the Laws of the Country made it to be That those Laws were to be observed and the Oaths taken by them having the force of a Contract between Magistrate and People could not be violated without danger of dissolving the whole Fabrick That few would be so gentle as to spare even the best Magistrates if by their destruction a wild Usurper could become God's Anointed This seems to agree with the Doctrines of the most Reverend Authors of all Times Nations and Religions The best and wisest of Kings have ever acknowledged it King James in his Speech to the Parliament Anno 1603 doth in the highest degree assert it The Scripture seems to declare it If the Writer nevertheless was mistaken No Man for such matters hath ever been referred to the Judgment of a Jury composed of Men utterly unable to comprehend them But there was little of this in my Case The extravagance of my Prosecutors goes higher The Treatise was never finished nor could be in many Years So much as is of it was written long since never reviewed nor shewn to any Man. Whatsoever is said of the expulsion of Tarquin The Insurrection of Nero The Slaughter of Caligula or Domitian c. is applied by Innuendo unto the King. They have not considered that if such Acts of State be not good no King in the World has any title nor can have any unless he could deduce his Pedigree from the eldest Son of Noah and shew that the Succession had still continued in the Eldest of the Eldest Line and been so deduced to him But I was long since told that I must dye or the Plot must dye Lest the means of destroying the best Protestants in England should fail the Bench must be filled with such as have been Blemishes to the Bar. None But such as these would have advised with the King's Councel of the means of bringing a man to death Suffered a Jury to be pack'd by the King's Solicitors and the Under-Sheriff Admit of Jury Men who are not Freeholders Receive such evidence as is above mentioned refuse a Copy of an Indictment or to suffer the Statute of 46 Edward 3. to be read that doth enact It should in no case be denied unto any Man upon any occasion whatsoever over-rule the most important points of Law without hearing And whereas the Statute 25 Edward 3. upon which they said I should be tryed doth reserve unto the Parliament all Constructions to be made in point of Treason They could assume unto themselves not only a power to make Constructions but such Constructions as neither agree with Law Reason or Common Sense By these means I am brought to this place The Lord forgive these Practices and avert the Evils that threaten the Nation from them The Lord sanctifie these my Sufferings unto me and tho' I fall as a Sacrifice unto Idols suffer not Idolatry to be established in this Land. Bless thy People and save them defend thy own Cause and defend those that defend it Stir up such as are saint direct those that are willing Confirm those that waver Give Wisdom and Integrity unto all Order all things so as may most redound to thy own Glory Grant that I may dye glorifying Thee for all thy Mercies and that at the last thou hast permitted me to be singled out as a Witness of thy Truth and even by the Confession of my Opposers for that old Câ—use in which I was from my Youth engaged and for which thou hast often and wonderfully declared thy Self Thus for Innuendo Treasons and by a barbarous prosecution fell this never to be forgotten Champion and Martyr for the English Liberties the honourable and valiant Colonel Algernon Sidney This great Man
having in his forementioned Paper mentioned the Opinion of King James the first delivered in his Speech to the Parliament in the Year 1603. I shall here to gratifie the Reader 's Curiosity transcribe a Paragraph or two of that Learned King's Speech viz. I do acknowledge that the special and greatest point of difference that is betwixt a rightful King and an usurping Tyrant is in this That whereas the proud and ambitious Tyrant doth think his Kingdom and People are only ordained for the satisfaction of his Desires unreasonable Appetites The righteous and just King doth on the contrary acknowledge himself to be ordained for the procuring of the Wealth and Prosperity of his People and that his great and principal Worldly Felicity must consist in their Prosperity That I am a Servant it is most true That as I am Head and Governour of all the People in my Dominion who are my natural Subjects considering them in distinct Ranks So if we will take in the People as one Body Then as the Head is ordained for the Body and not the Body for the Head so must a righteous King know himself to be ordained for his People and not his People for him Wherefore I will never be ashamed to sonfess it my principal honour to be the great Servant of the Common-wealth To this I shall subjoyn a few Words to the same purpose out of that King's Speech to the Parliament in 1609 Every just King in a settled Kingdom is bound to observe that Paction made to his People by his Laws in framing his Government agreeable thereunto And therefore a King governing in a settled Kingdom ceases to be a King and degenerates into a Tyrant as soon as he leaves off to rule according to the Laws Notes upon the Tryal of Sr Samuel Barnardiston Baronet at Guild-Hall London Before Sr George Jefferies Lord Chief Justice of the King's Bench upon the 14 th day of February 1683. upon an Information to the effect following viz. THat there having been a Horrid Plot lately discovered the Defendant to scandalize the Evidence wrote a Letter to this effect viz. That the return of the Duke of Monmouth and his being received into Favour with the King had made a great alteration at Court and that those who before spoke indecently of him did now court and creep to him Yesterday being the last of the Term all the Prisoners in the Tower upon the late Sham Protestant Plot were Bailed The Information against Mr Bavddon who Prosecuted the Murder of the Earl of Essex for a Subornation was not prosecuted and his Bail was discharged and the passing Sentence upon the Author of Julian the Apostate and the Printer of the late Lord Russel's Speech was passed over with silence Great Applications are made to the King for the pardoning Mr Sidney The Lord Howard appears despicable in the eyes of all men The Papists and high Tories are quite down in the Mouth Their Pride is abated and themselves and their Plot confounded but their Malice is not Asswaged It s generally said the Earl of Essex was Murdered The brave Lord Russel is afresh Lamented The Plot is lost here except you in the Country can find it out amongst the Addressers and Abhorrers And that he wrote in another Letter to this effect The King is never pleased but when the Duke of Monmouth is with him His Pardon was Sealed and delivered to him last Wednesday 't is said he will be restored to be Master of the Horse c. He treats all his old Friends with great Civility they are all satisfied with his Integrity and if God spare his Life doubt not but he will be an Instrument of much good to the King and Kingdom he said publickly that he knew my Lord Russel was as Loyal a Subject as any in England and that his Majesty believ'd the same now it would make you laugh to see how strangely our high Torys and Clergy are mortified their Countenances speak it Sr George is grown very humble It s said Mr Sidney is reprieved for forty days which bodes well And that in a third Letter he wrote thus The late change here in publick Affairs is so great and strange that we are like men in a Dream and fear we are not fit for so great a Mercy as the present Juncture seems to promise the Sham Protestant Plot is quite lost and confounded And that in a fourth Letter there are these expressions Contrary to all mens expectations a Warrant is signed for beheading Colonel Sidney at Tower-Hill next Fryday great endeavours have been used to obtain this Pardon but the contrary party have carried it which much dasheth our Hopes but God still governs The King's Counsel to prosecute this matter were The Recorder of London Mr Herbert quickly after made Lord Chief Justice Mr Jones Counsel for Sr S. Barnardiston were Mr Williams Mr Thompson and Mr Blackerby The Jury pick'd out to try this Cause were Thomas Vernon Knighted soon after the Service done in this Cause and then made Fore-man of a Jury to convict Dr Otes of Perjury Percival Gilburne one of the Jury upon the Guildhall Riot Edward Bovery William Withers senior A well qualified Jury-Man for this Cause James VVood Robert Masters A principal Witness against Colledge Samuel Newton Another of the Riot Jury George Toriano One of the Lord Russell's Jury Kenelm Smyth Thomas Goddard Thomas Amy and Richard Blackburne The Rocorder of London and Mr Herbert having aggravated the charge in the Information Mr Blaithwait Atterbury the Messenger and Nehemiah Osland Sr Samuel's Servant gave evidence of the writing those Letters and sending them by the Post for Sr Philip Skippon Mr Gael and Mr Cavel in Suffolk Then Mr Williams Counsel for Sr Samuel applied to the Jury to this effect That the question was Whether Sr Samuel were knowingly guilty of the Writing and publishing the four Letters That as to his publishing them he saw no evidence and he put it to the Court whether the sending them to the Post-House could amount to the publishing a Libel and he added to the Jury that he supposed they would not take it upon their Oaths that he was guilty of what he was there accused of many things being laid in the Information to inhanse the Crime of which there was no proof The Clamorous Chief Justice proceeding to dierct the Jury expressed himself to this effect That the Information took notice of a horrid Conspiracy lately hatcht for the destruction of the King and subversion of the Government and that the Lord Russell and Algernon Sidney who were ingaged in that damnable Conspiracy were convicted and executed That the Defendant being dissaffected and a man of ill Principles to disturb the Government did cause the four Letters to be writ and published That the Letters were Factious Seditious and Malitious and as base as the worst of mankind could have invented That it was a work of time and thought fixt in his
very Nature and shewed so much Venom as would make one think the whole mass of his Blood were corrupted Here is malice against the King malice against the Government malice against both Church and State malice against any man that bears any share in the Government indeed malice against all mankind that are not of the same perswasion with those bloody Miscreants Here is the sanctifying of Traytors justly executed Here is the Sainting of two horrid Conspirators the Lord Russell that blessed Martyr my Lord Russell that good man that excellent Protestant he is lamented and here is Mr Sidney Sainted and what an extraordinary man was he 't is a shame to think that such bloody Miscreants should be Sainted and lamented 'T is high time for all mankind that have any Christianity or sense of Heaven or Hell to bestir themselves to rid the Nation of such Caterpillars such monsters of Villany as these are These Letters tell you God would be sure to raise up Instruments but what Instruments do they mean Instruments of Rebellion and Faction and Sedition which they most falsly call his own Work. The question is whether the Defendant be guilty of writing these Venomous Malicious Seditious Factious Tumultuous Letters of which you have as full and plain proof as can be made And as to his publishing them can you think that he would write all this Malitious Stuff to put them in his Pocket but you have it sworn that the Defendant said they were sent to the Post-House Then the Jury immediately gave in their Verdict that the Defendant was Guilty of the Offence and Misdemeanor charged in the Indictment as no doubt they resolved to do before they heard one word of the matter The Judgment upon this Verdict was that the Defendant should pay 10000 l Fine and be Imprisoned till paid and to find Sureties for the good Behaviour for Life Accordingly he was committed for the Fine to the King's Bench and continued a Prisoner four or five years which satisfied not but Graham and Burton those Instruments of Rapine and Oppression broke in upon his Estate and besides the Waste and Destruction made they levyed to their own Use and the King 's about 6000 l. Notes upon the Proceedings against Sr Thomas Armstrong at the King's Bench the 14 th of June 1684. Before the Lord Chief Justice Jefferies Justice VVithens Justice Holloway and Justice VValcot SR Thomas Armstrong having been Out-lawed upon an Indictment of high Treason and betrayed and brought from Holland was Committed to New-gate upon the 10 th of June 1684. by the Warrant of Sidney Goldolphin Esq principal Secretary of State And upon the 14 th of June being brought to the King's Bench Bar Sr Robert Sawyer Attorney General moved the Court for an award of Execution upon the Outlawry Whereupon he was Arraigned on the Outlawry viz. that he had been Indicted of high Treason for conspiring against the King's Life and the Government That for not appearing to plead and try that Indictment he stood Outlawed and thereby Attainted of the Treason And it was demanded of him what he had to say why Execution should not be awarded against him Sr Thomas urged that he was beyond Sea at the time of the Outlawry and desired that he might be Tryed To which the Chief Justice answered We have nothing to do but to award Execution Sr Thomas desired that the Statute 6. Edward 6. might be read which gives the Person Outlawed for Treason a year to reverse it if he were beyond Sea and desired that Counsel might be assigned him The Chief Justice ordered the Statute to be read to which the Attorney General assented but said Sr Thomas would not find it to his purpose it was read to this effect That all process of Outlawry for Treason against Offenders being beyond the Seas shall be effectual in the Law but it provides that if the Party shall within a year yield himself to the Chief Justice and offer to traverse the Indictment he shall be received to traverse and being found not Guilty he shall be acquitted of the Outlawry and of all Penalties and Forfeitures by reason thereof Then the Attorney General said Sr Thomas now I suppose will shew he yielded himself to your Lordship and added that before he went out of England he might have rendred himself and been Tryed if he had pleased Sr Thomas Armstrong answered I have been a Prisoner the year is not yet out I now render my self and do conceive I am within the Benefit of the Statute and do desire it The Chief Justice replyed we are of another opinion we cannot take notice of it there is no doubt nor difficulty at all in the thing and applying to Richardson said Captain Richardson you shall have a rule for Execution on Friday next Then Sr Thomas offered to the Court that one in that place had the benefit of a Tryal offered him and that was it that he desired for he thanked God his Case was quite another then his That he knew his own Innocence And so did They too otherwise he had not been denyed a Tryal and desired to make it appear by a Tryal To this the Chief Justice answered that which you speak of was the Grace and Mercy of King who may if he please extend the same to you but we are satisfied that according to Law we must award Execution upon this Outlawry Thereupon Mrs Mathews Sr Thomas's Daughter said My Lord I hope you will not Murder my Father for which being Brow-beaten and checkt she added God Almighty's Judgments light upon you Then the Attorney General said that he would acquaint the Court with one thing in reference to what Sr Thomas had said That the King did indeed indulge Holloway so far as to offer him a Tryal and perhaps might have some reason for it but affirmed that the Prisoner deserved no sort of Indulgence or Mercy and then in effect went on to give Evidence against him saying that it appeared that after the disappointment to the meeting at the Rye by the New-market fire Sr Thomas was one of those who engaged to destroy the King by the way upon his hasty coming then to Town and affirmed that this did appear upon a full and clear Evidence and that when he was taken beyond Sea Letters of Communication with Foreign Ministers and other people were found about him The Chief Justice knowing a more expeditious way of murdering this Gentleman said he would not meddle with evidence telling the Attorney that that was not their business and no doubt they were both conscious that they had not evidence where with to convict him and said we have nothing more to do but to award Execution Sr Thomas still insisted that he was within the Statute that he was Out-lawed while he was beyond Sea and that the twelve Moneths not being past he ought to have the Law and demanded no more Thereupon the Bloody-Monster in a most insolent and