the 12 th Verse of the 7 th Chapter of Zachary They made their Hearts as an Adamant Stone least they should hear the Law and the Words which the Lord of Hosts hath sent in his Spirit by the former Prophets where Spirit must signifie mercy in this Sense speaketh also the Prophet Haggai Chap. 2. v. 5. Loe my Spirit that is my Grace and Mercy remaineth among you fear ye not Isa. Chap. 48. v. 16. It is said the Lord and his Spirit hath sent me there Spirit may be understood to signifie the Will and Mercy of God or his mind revealed in the Law for the Prophet saith from the beginning that is when he first came to declare Gods Wrath and Judgments against them he spake not in secret from the time that it was published there was I but now I am a Messenger of Joy sent by the Mercy of God to proclaim your restauration it may also as I have already said be taken for the mind and will of God revealed in the Law that is he by the Command of the Law Levit. Chap. 19. v. 17. came to admonish them therefore under the same conditions and in the same manner he warns as Moses did and at last like Moses ends with predicting their restauration but in my Opinion the first Exposition seems the best To return to what was first intended by all these Quotations it is evident that these following plain Phrases of Scripture The Prophets had the Spirit of God. God poured out his Spirit upon Men. Men were filled with the Spirit of God and with the Holy Ghost signifie nothing more then that the Prophets had some particular extraordinary Vertue above other Men and were Persons very Eminent for their constant piety Moreover that they understood the Mind and Will of God for we have shewn that the Spirit in the Hebrew Language signifies both the mind and the purpose and resolutions of the mind yea the Law because it makes known Gods Mind is called the Spirit and Mind of God so that the imagination of the Prophets forasmuch as by it the decrees and purposes of God were revealed may likewise be called the Mind of God and the Prophets may be said to have the Spirit of God now though the Mind and Will of God be Written in our minds and his Eternal purposes and decrees be Engraven on our Hearts and consequently to use the Scripture Phrase we also understand the Mind of God yet because natural Knowledge is common to all Men it is very little esteem'd and the Iews who valued themselves above all other Nations extreamly despised it because it was common to all Mankind Lastly the Prophets were said to have the Spirit of God because Men were altogether ignorant of the Causes of Prophetical Knowledge and did not only admire it but as they did all other strange and unusual things ascribed it to God as the immediate Author of it We may then without any scruple affirm that the Prophets did no other way understand the revelations of God then by the help of imagination that is by the means of words or signs and these either real or imaginary for seeing we find in Scripture no other means beside these it is not lawful to suppose or fancy any other but by what Laws and Rules of Nature it was done I confess I am utterly ignorant I might with others say it was done by the Power of God but it would be little to the purpose and no more then if I should by some unintelligible terms express the form of any thing all things are done by the Power of God for the Power of Nature is nothing but the Power of God and 't is certain that we therefore do not understand the Power of God because we are ignorant of natural Causes and we very foolishly have recourse to the Power of God when we know not the natural Cause of any thing that is when we are ignorant of Gods Power but we have now no need of knowing the cause of prophetical Knowledge for as I have already intimated we only endeavour to find out what the Scripture teacheth us that from thence as from the precepts of Nature we may know our Duty but with the Causes of Scripture-Doctrines we have nothing to do Seeing then the Prophets by the help of imagination understood those things which God revealed there is no doubt but they perceived many things which were beyond the extent of natural understanding for from words and signs many more Ideas may be formed then can be only out of those Principles and Notions upon which all our natural Knowledge is founded Hence it is evident why the Prophets perceived and declared all things parabolically and in dark Speeches and exprest all spiritual things after a corporal manner because that doth better sute with the nature of the imagination neither can we now wonder why the Scripture or the Prophets spake so improperly and obscurely of the Spirit or Mind of God as Numb Chap. 11. v. 17. I will come down and talk with thee there and I will take of the Spirit which is upon thee and put it on them Likewise in the 1 st Book of Kings chap. 22. v. 11. and Zedekiah the Son of Chenaanah made him Horns of Iron and he said thus saith the Lord with these shalt thou push the Syrians till thou hast consumed them Michah saw God sitting Daniel saw him like an Old Man cloathed in white Garments Ezekiel like fire and they who were with Christ descending like a Dove the Apostles like Cloven Tongues and Paul before his Conversion like a great light all which Visions agree with those fancies and imaginations which the vulgar have of God and of Spirits Lastly because the imagination is wandring and unconstant Prophesy did not long continue with the Prophets nor was it frequent but very rare and as there were but very few that had it so likewise 't was very seldom we are now to inquire how the Prophets could be sure of those things which they perceived only by the strength of imagination and not by the certain Principles of mental Knowledge but whatever may be said concerning this Particular ought to be fetcht from Scripture tho' as we have already confest we have no true knowledge of the thing and cannot explain it by its first Causes however what the Scripture declareth concerning the truth and certainty of the Prophets I will shew in the following Chapter wherein I resolve to treat of Prophets CHAP. II. Of Prophets IT appears by the preceding Chapter that the Prophets were not endued with perfection of mind above other Men but only with strength and vivacity of imagination which Scripture-Histories abundantly testify Solomon excell'd all others in Wisdom but not in the gift of Prophesy Heman Darda Kalcoll tho' Men very Wise yet were no Prophets when plain Countrymen who had no Learning yea Women as Hagar Abrahams Maid had that gift which is agreeable both to
wrought upon his fancy for being thrice called Samuel still thought it was by Ely the voice which Abimelech heard was imaginary for it said Gen. chap. 20. v. 6 God said unto him in a Dream and therefore Abimelech not waking but in his sleep the time when the fancy is naturally most apt to imagin things that are not might have a strong Impression of Gods Will upon his Imagination It is the Opinion of some Iews that the words of the Decalogue were not vocally pronounced by God but that the Israelites only heard a noise which did not articulately form words but that the People during the noise mentally understood the Laws of the Decalogue which was once also my own Opinion because I found the words of the Decalogue in Exodus to differ from those of the Decalogue in Deutronomy whence it might seem to follow seeing God spake but once that the Decalogue is not the very words of God but only contains the Sence or signification of his Will. But unless we will wrest the Scripture it must be granted that the Israelites did hear a real and true voice for the 4 th vers of the 5 th chap. of Deut. saith The Lord talked with you Face to Face in the Mount that is as two Men use Personally and Corporally to communicate their conceptions one to another therefore it seems much more consonant to Scripture that God did really create a voice by which he revealed the Decalogue but the reason why the words of the two Decalogues vary may be seen in the 8 th following Chapter of this Book yet that neither fully solves the doubt for it seems very Irrational to conclude that any thing created by and depending on God as all other created Beings do should be able to express or expound the Essence or Existence of God Personally viz. by saying in the first Person I am the Lord thy God though where a Man says with his Mouth I understand yet no Body thinks 't is the mouth of that Man but his Mind that understands but because the mouth hath Reference to the Nature of the Man that said it and the Person also to whom it was said knows what is the Nature of the Intellect he easily understands the mind of the speaking Person by a Comparative consideration of himself but they who knew nothing of God but his mere name and desired him to speak that they might be certain of his Existence how could they be satisfyed in their Request by any Creatures saying I am thy God when that Creature which said so did no more resemble God nor belong to his Nature then any other Creature did what if God should have Framed the Lips of Moses yea of any Beast to have articulatly pronounced and spoken those words I am thy God doth it follow that the Israelites should thereby have understood the Being and Existence of God Moreover the Scripture seems plainly to declare that God himself spoke and for that end descended from Heaven down upon Mount Sinai and that not only the Iews heard him speak but also the Nobles and Elders as we read in the 24 th c. of Ex. Neither doth the Law revealed to Moses to or from which nothing was to be added or taken away and was the Establisht Law of the Country ever command that we should believe God to be Incorporeal and to have no Shape or Figure but only that we should believe there is a God and should Worship him only and that the Iews might not depart from his Worship he commanded that they should not fancy or make any likeness or Image of him for since they had never seen any likeness of God they could make no Image which would Resemble God but necessarily some other Creature which they had seen and so bestow the Worship and Honour of God upon that Creature The Scripture expressly declares God to have Figure and that Moses when he heard God speak happened to see it though indeed it was but his back parts in which there is a hidden Mistery of which we will hereafter speak more at large I will now go on to quote those places which declare the means whereby God hath revealed his Decrees to Men. That Revelation may happen only by Signs or Figures is plain by the 21 th chap. of the 1 st Book of Chron. where God declared his Anger to David by an Angel holding a drawn Sword in his hand in like manner to Balaam and though Maimonides and some others would have it thought that in this Story and all others which relate the appearing of Angels as to Manoah and to Abraham when he would have Sacrificed his Son the Apparitions were always in sleep not that any Man broad waking is able to see an Angel yet they talk to no purpose for they minded nothing else but straining Scripture to countenance Aristotle's and their own idle Figments than which nothing can be more ridiculous God revealed to Ioseph his future Dominion by Images that were not real and external but internal and depending only upon the Imagination of the Prophet By Signs and Words God revealed to Iosua that he would Fight for the Israelites by shewing to him an Angel with a Sword in his hand as Captain of the Host and by words also which Iosua heard from the Angel it was represented to Isaiah by Figures chap. 6. That God's Providence would desert the People by imagining the most holy God on a very high Throne and the Israelites polluted and plunged in the filth of their Sins and so at a great distance from God by which signs he understood the present miserable state of the People but their future calamities were revealed to him by words spoken as it were by God himself And of this kind I could bring many Examples out of Sacred Writ were they not so generally known to all but all these things are more clearly proved by the Text it self in the 12 th Chap. Numb v. 6 7. If there be a Prophet among you I the Lord will make my self known to him in a Vision that is by signs and hieroglyphics but as for the Prophesy of Moses it was vision without signs and will make my self known to him in a dream that is not in a true real voice and words But to my Servant Moses not so with him will I speak mouth to mouth even apparently and not in dark Speeches and the similitude of the Lord shall he behold that is beholding me as a Friend and Companion speaks to me without fear as it is in the 33. chap. of Exod. v. 11. Therefore without doubt the rest of the Prophets did not hear a true and real voice which yet more evidently appears out of the 34. chap. of Deu. v. 10. And there arose not a Prophet since in Israel like unto Moses whom the Lord knew face to face which must be understood by voice only for Moses himself as the 33. chap. of Exod. plainly declares did never
fitted and proportion'd to Mens understanding and capacity as I have proved mine to be the difficulties that are in it have proceeded from Mens sloth and negligence not from the nature of the Method CHAP. VIII Sheweth that the Pentateuk Books of Joshua Judges Ruth Samuel and the Kings were not Written by the Persons whose Names they bear and then inquires whether the Writers of all these Books were diverse Persons or but one and who IN the former Chapter we have spoken of the Foundations and Principles of the Knowledge of the Scriptures and we have shewn them to be nothing else but a true History of the Scripture which History tho' very necessary the Antients neglected to compose or at least if they Writ or left any by Tradition it perished by the injury of time and consequently a great part of the Fundamentals and Principles of Scripture-knowledge was lost which loss however had been more tollerable if Men of succeeding Ages had kept themselves within their true bounds and had faithfully delivered to their Successors those few Principles which they received or found out and had not out of their own Brains forged new whereby the History of Scripture is not only imperfect but remains full of Errors and the Foundations of Scripture Knowledge are not only so few that a perfect History cannot be built on them but they are also very faulty and defective To rectify this and remove the common prejudices in Divinity is my purpose but I fear I go about it too late for things are now almost come to that heigth Men in this point will endure no correction but obstinately defend whatever they have embraced under the form of Religion Reason prevailing with very few so universally have these prejudices spread themselves in the Minds of Men. I will nevertheless endeavour and try what I can do because the business is not absolutely desperate that I may in order shew what these prejudices are I will begin with those which concern the Penmen of those Books that are accounted sacred and first concerning the Writer of the five Books of Moses commonly called the Pentateuk Men have generally believed that they were Written by Moses himself and the Pharisees so stifly defended this Opinion that they counted him a Heretic that thought otherwise and for this Reason Aben Ezra a Person of an ingenuous disposition and no mean Learning being the first I read of who took notice of this mistake durst not plainly declare his thoughts but only hinted his Opinion in obscure Words which I will not scruple to explain and give you their naked meaning Aben Ezra's Words in his comment upon Deutronomy are these Beyond Iordan Now thou mayest understand the Mistery of twelve and Moses also wrote the Law and the Cananite was then in the Land in the Mount of the Lord shall it be seen behold his Bedsted was a Bedsted of Iron then shalt thou know the Truth by these few Words he shews and plainly declares that it was not Moses but some other Person that lived long after him who wrote the Pentateuk and that Moses wrote some other Book to make this appear his first Observation is that the Preface of Deutronomy which begins thus These be the words of Moses which he spake unto all Israel beyond Jordan could not be Written by Moses who never passed Iordan His second Observation is that the Book which Moses wrote was fairly Copyed out in the compass of one Altar as appears Deut. chap. 27. v. 5 8. Iosh. chap. 8. v. 31 32. which Altar the Rabbins declare was made only of twelve Stones from whence it follows that the Book which Moses Writ was a Volume much less then the Pentateuk and this I think Aben Ezra meant by the mistery of twelve unless perhaps he understood those twelve Curses which are in the forementioned 27 th Chapter of Deutronomy which he might believe were not Written in the Book of the Law and therefore beside the Writing of the Law commanded the Levites to repeat those Curses that they might by Oath bind the People to observe the Written Laws or else perhaps he meant the last Chapter of Deutronomy that speaks of Moses's Death which Chapter consists only of twelve Verses but these and other things which are spoken only by guess need not a more curious Examination The third Observation is that 't is said Deut. chap. 31. v. 9. Moses wrote this Law and delivered it c. which could not be the words of Moses but of some other Person declaring what Moses did and what he wrote His fourth Observation is that place Gen. chap. 12. v. 6. where it is said speaking of Abraham passing through Canaan that the Cananite was then in the Land which words must be Written after Moses's Death when the Cananites were driven out and did not possess the Land and this must likewise be the meaning of Aben Ezra's commenting upon this place in these words And the Cananite was then in the Land it seems that Canaan Nephew to Noah took that Land from some others who possessed it if not then there is a great mistery in the thing whosoever understands it let him be silent that is if Canaan invaded those Countries then the meaning of those Words the Cananite was then in the Land must be that there was a time past when the Land was inhabited by another Nation but if Canaan were the first who lived in that Country as appears by the 10 th Chap. of Gen. he was then the words must imply that in the time of the Person who wrote the Book of Genesis the Cananites were not in the Land so that Moses could not be the Writer of it because in his time the Cananites were still in the Possession of that Country and this is that Mistery he would not have made public His Fifth Observation is that which is in the 22 th chap. Gen. v. 14 where speaking of Mount Moriah the Text saith it is said to this day in the Mountain of the Lord shall it be seen now it was not called the Mountain of the Lord till after it was dedicated to the Building of the Temple and this choice of the Mountain was not made in the time of Moses who did not speak of any place chosen by God but only foretels that God would in time to come chuse a place which should bear Gods Name His sixth Observation is what is said Deut. chap. 3. speaking of Og King of Basan these words are interposed v. 11 th for only Og King of Basan remained of the remnant of the Gyants behold his Bedsted was a Bedsted of Iron is it not in Rabbah of the Children of Ammon Nine Cubits was the length thereof which Parenthesis clearly shews that the Writer of these Books lived long after Moses for this manner of speaking argues that the Person related what past long ago and to obtain credit shewed some Antient Reliques Without question this Bedsted was first
are deep Mysteries hidden in the Scripture but because from thence hath sprung up intollerable Superstition and many other mischievous inconveniences of which I spake in the beginning of the seventh Chapter I could not possibly pass them by Religion needs not be attired with any Superstitious Ornaments but rather loseth part of its Beauty and Lustre when it is adorned with such Fopperies But some will say That tho' the Divine Law be written in Mens Hearts yet nevertheless the Scripture is the word of God and therefore 't is as unlawful to say of Scripture as of the Word of God that 't is maimed or corrupted I on the other side fear such Men pretend too much Sanctity and convert Religion into Superstition yea that they worship Pictures and Images that is Paper and Ink for the Word of God this I know that I have said nothing misbecoming the Scripture or the Word of God and that I have laid down no Position which I have not made good by clear Reason and therefore I may positively aver that I have not publish'd any thing that is impious or that savors of the least impiety I confess some prophane persons to whom Religion is a burthen may take a liberty of sinning and without any reason indulging their sensual pleasure may infer that the Scripture is every where faulty and falsify'd and consequently of no Authority to such Men nothing will be an answer for according to the common saying that which is never so well and truly spoken may be abused by an ill and sinister Interpretation they that are lovers of their Pleasure will take any occasion to do it and they who in time past had those Originals the Ark of the Covenant the Prophets and Apostles themselves were not one jot the more obedient or the better for them but all as well Iews as Gentiles were alike still the same and Vertue in all Ages was a thing very rare But to clear all Scruples I will now shew upon what ground and reason Scripture or any other mute thing may be called Sacred or Holy next what is indeed the Word of God that it is not contained in a certain number of Books And lastly that as it contains those things which are necessary to Obedience and Salvation it cannot be corrupted By these particulars every one may easily judge that I speak nothing against the Word of God or give any occasion for Men to be wicked or ungodly That is called Holy and Divine which is dedicated to Piety and the practice of Religion and a thing continues Holy so long as Men make a Religious use thereof when Men cease to be Religious that thing ceaseth to be Sacred and when the thing is used to impious purposes then that thing which was before Sacred becomes unholy and prophane For example the very place called by Iacob the Patriarch Beth-el the House of God because he there worship'd God reveal'd to him was afterwards called by the Prophets the House of Iniquity Amos chap. 5. v. 5. Hoshea chap. 10. v. 5. because the Israelites by the Command of Ieroboam did there sacrifice to Idols Another example will plainly prove the thing Words have a certain signification only by use and custom and if they be according to that use so disposed that they move Men who read them to Devotion then those words are esteemed Sacred and likewise the Book wherein they are written but if afterward it come to pass that the use of those words is lost and thereby the words become insignificant and the Book wherein such words are is quite neglected and laid aside either through malice or because Men have no need of it then the words and the Book as they are of no use so have they no Sanctity in them Lastly If those words come to be otherwise construed and Custom so far prevail as to give them a clean contrary sense and signification then the words and the Book which were before esteemed Sacred may become filthy and profane whence it follows that nothing can be absolutely either Sacred or Profane but only in respect of Mans Mind or Understanding which clearly appears by many places of Scripture I will quote only one or two Ieremy chap. 7. v. 24. saith the Iews did falsely call Solomon's Temple the Temple of God for as he further saith in that Chapter the Name of God could remain in that Temple no longer than it was frequented by Men who worship'd him and maintain'd Justice but when Murderers Robbers and Idolaters resorted to it 't was then but a Den of Thieves I have often wonder'd that the Scripture no where declares what became of the Ark of the Covenant certainly it was either lost or burnt with the Temple tho' nothing was esteemed more Sacred and Venerable among the Iews The Scripture then is Sacred and its sayings Divine so long as Men are thereby moved to Devotion but if the Scripture be quite neglected as it was heretofore by the Iews it is nothing but Paper and Ink 't is then profaned and left liable to Corruption and when it is corrupted and perisheth it cannot be truly said the Word of God is corrupted and lost as in the Prophet Ieremy's time it could not be truly said the Temple of God was burnt which Ieremy himself declareth of the Law for chap. 8. v. 8. he reproves the Wicked in these words How do ye say we are wise and the Law of the Lord is with us Lo certainly in vain made he it the Pen of the Scribes is in vain that is tho' ye have the Scripture yet ye falsely say you have the Law of God since ye have made it of no effect In like manner when Moses brake the first Tables it cannot be said that in anger he cast the Law of God out of his Hands and brake it no person ought to think so he brake only the Stones which tho' before accounted Sacred because upon them was engraven the Covenant by which the Iews bound themselves to obey God yet afterward had not the least Sanctity in them because the People by worshiping the Golden Calf made that Covenant void For the same cause the second Tables with the Ark wherein they were kept might likewise perish 'T is no wonder then if none of those Originals are to be found or that the like should befal the Books we have when the very Original of Gods Law the most Sacred of all things is utterly lost Let Men then forbear to charge me with impiety seeing I have spoken nothing against the Word of God nor have any way profaned it if their anger be just let it be vented against the people of old whose wickedness prophaned and destroyed the Ark of God the Temple the Law and all things else that were Sacred If according to the 2 d Epist. to the Corinth chap. 3. v. 3. The Epistle of Christ were written not with Ink but with the Spirit of the living God not in Tables
had Temples dedicated to him and was worshipt by Flamens and Priests in the same manner that other Gods were Tacitus in his First Book of Annals tells us That Alexander would be saluted by the Name of Iupiter's Son which was not Pride but Design as appears by the Answer he return'd to the invective Speech made by Hermolaus In the Eighth Book and Eighth Section of Quintus Curtius Alexander speaks to this purpose One thing is very ridiculous which Hermolaus requires That I should not own Jupiter to be my Father being so declared by his Oracle as if the Answer of the Gods were in my Power he offer'd me the Name of his Son which was very suitable to the Designs I am now about I wish the Indians would also believe me to be a God Success in War depends much upon Fame and that which is falsly believed sometimes works the same effects which things do that are true In which few words he very artificially endeavours to continue People in their ignorance and neatly insinuates the Design of his dissembling which Cleo likewise did in his Oration whereby he endeavour'd to perswade the Macedonians to sooth and flatter the King for after he had with admiration spoken in praise of Alexander and reckon'd up all his Merits giving a colour of Truth to the Fraud he shews the advantages gain'd by it in words to this effect The Persians are not only prudent but pious in worshipping their Kings as Gods because it was the Safety of Majesty and then concludes That he himself would be the first who at the King's entrance would fall down upon the Earth and worship him and that he thought the wisest amongst them would follow his Example See Curtius in his Eighth Book § 8. But the Macedonians were wiser Nor can any but meer Barbarians be so grosly cheated and of Subjects suffer themselves to be made Slaves altogether unprofitable to themselves Others have with more ease perswaded the World That the Majesty of Kings is Sacred that they are God's Vicegerents on Earth ordained by God and not establisht by the Votes and Consent of Men but preserved and defended by the particular aid and protection of Divine Providence This and much more have Monarchs devised to secure their Government with which I will not meddle but proceed to those things which for the preservation of Government Divine Revelation taught Moses We have already declared in the Fifth Chapter that after the Israelites went out of Egypt they were not subject to the Laws or power of any other Nation but it was lawful for them to Institute what Laws and possess what Lands they pleased for when they were freed from the intollerable bondage of the Egyptians and were not bound by Covenant to any Mortal they again recover'd their natural Right to all things which were in their Power and every Man might freely resolve whether he would keep his natural Right or part with and transfer it to another Being then in this natural State by the Counsel of Moses in whom all had a very great trust and confidence they resolved to transfer their Power upon no mortal Man but upon God only and without further delay promis'd all with one Voice to obey God in all things and never to own any other Power but such as God by Prophetical Revelation should institute and appoint This Promise and Translation of their Right and Power upon God was in the same manner that we have supposed it to be done in a common Society when Men resolve to depart with their natural Right For as it appears Exod. chap. 24. ver 7. they freely without any Compulsion not terrified with any threats did by express Covenant and Oath part with their natural Right and transfer'd it upon God and that the Covenant might be firm and binding without any suspicion of fraud God Covenanted nothing with them till after they had made tryal of his wonderful Power by which they had already been and were afterwards to be preserved see Exod. chap. 19. v. 4 5. for upon this very ground of believing that the Power of God only could save them they transfer'd all their Power of preserving themselves and consequently all their Right upon God. The Government then of the Jews was only in God and therefore by vertue of the Covenant was called the Kingdom of God God was rightful King of the Jews and consequently the Enemies of that Government were Gods Enemies and the Subjects of that Commonwealth who went about to usurp that Government were guilty of Treason against his Divine Majesty and the Laws of that Common-wealth were the Laws and Commands of God So that in this Commonwealth Civil Right and Religion which we have shewn consists only in Obedience towards God were but one and the same thing My meaning is that the Doctrines of Religion were Laws and Commands Piety was Justice and Impiety wrong and Injustice he that forsook the publick Religion ceased to be a Subject and upon that very account was thought an Enemy he that dy'd for Religion was thought to dye for his Country and between Religion and Civil Right there was no difference Upon this account this Government might very well be called Theocracy seeing the Subjects thereof were bound by no Law but what was revealed by God. But these things were thus more in opinion then reality for the Jews did indeed still retain the Absolute Power of Government as will appear by what shall be presently declared namely by the Form and Rules whereby their Government was Administred which is now my purpose to explain Seeing the Jews did not transfer their Power upon any other Man but all equally parted from it as is done in Democratical-government and all cryed with one Voice Whatsoever God himself without any other intermediate Person shall speak to us that will we do it clearly appears by this Agreement they all continued equal and the Power and Right of consulting God of receiving and interpreting Laws was equal in them all and the Administration of the Government was in the whole Congregation Upon this ground all equally at first hearken'd what God would say and what he would Command but in this first meeting they were so terrified and heard God speaking with so muh astonishment that every Man thought that day would be his last Full of very great fear they came again to Moses and said We have heard Gods Voice out of the midst of the Fire Now therefore why should we dye This great Fire will consume us we shall dye if we hear the Voice of the Lord our God any more therefore go thou near and hear all that the Lord our God shall say and speake thou unto us all that the Lord our God shall speak unto thee we will hear and do it By saying this they clearly abolisht the first Covenant and transfer'd upon Moses their own Right of consulting God and interpreting his Laws and Decrees for here they did not as before
Multitude as Superstition Whence it happens that the common People under colour of Religion are sometimes easily induced to adore their Kings and at other times to curse and abhor them as the common Plagues of Mankind Therefore to avoid this mischeif great Pains are taken to adorn and attire Religion whether true or false that it may appear very Grave and Solemn and all Persons pay unto it the highest degree of respect and veneration This hath so luckily succeeded amongst the. Turks who count it a Crime so much as to dispute and have their understandings possest with so many prejudices that there is no place in their Minds left for Reason no not so much as doubt But if it be as indeed it is the great Arcanum and concern of Monarchical Government to deceive the People and to cover Fear by which they are kept in Subjection under the specious name of Religion that so they may fight for Slavery as for their own Safety and think it no Shame but their greatest Honour to spend their Bloud and Lives for the Glory of one single Person so on the contrary in a free Commonwealth nothing can be more mischeivously devised or attempted than to possess Mens Judgments which are free with Prejudices or in any manner to restrain or compel them it being utterly repugnant to Common Liberty As for Seditions stir'd up under pretence of Religion they arise from enacting Laws concerning things meerly speculative and because Opinions are many times Condemned for Crimes and the maintainers and followers of those Opinions seldom Sacrific'd to the public Safety but to the Hatred and Cruelty of their Adversaries But if the Laws of Government would take no Notice of Words and only punish Mens Actions there could never be any lawful pretence for such Seditions nor could Controversies be turn'd into Quarrels Seeing therefore that Men are seldom so happy to live in a Commonwealth where every one is allowed the Liberty of Judging and Worshipping God according to his own Understanding or where nothing is esteem'd dearer and sweeter then Liberty I thought my Undertaking would be neither unpleasing or unprofitable if I could make it appear that such a Liberty may be granted without any danger to Religion or the Peace of a Commonwealth but that all three must stand and fall together And this is the chief thing which in this Treatise I intended to demonstrate to which purpose I thought it necessary in the first place to mark out the chief Prejudices concerning Religion I mean the Footsteps of Antient Servitude and in the next place those Prejudices which relate to the right of Sovereign Power which many with shameless boldness study to Usurp and then to secure themselves amuse the Minds of the Multitude still Subject to Superstition with specious shews of Religion that all may again run into Bondage In what order I make these things manifest I will presently in few words declare but first I will mention the Causes which moved me to write I have often wonder'd that Men who boast themselves Professors of the Christian Religion which consists in Love Peace Moderation and Dealing uprightly with all Men should so unjustly contend and cruelly hate one another by which their Faith is better known then by the forenamed Vertues There is now scarce any Man whatever he be Christian Iew Turk or Heathen that can be known by any thing but his habit and attire by frequenting such a Church by maintaining such an Opinion or by being the sworn Disciple of such a Master but in all other things Mens Lives and Conversations are all alike Searching into the Cause of this Evil I found it proceeded from the common Peoples being perswaded that a very great part of Religion consisted in setting a very high value upon the Service Dignities Offices and Benefits of the Church and in honouring Churchmen with all possible Reverence for so soon as this abuse crept into the Church every Knave had a mind to be a Priest and the desire of propagating Religion degenerated into sordid Avarice and Ambition so that the Temple it self was turn'd into a Theatre where Ecclesiastical Doctors did not Preach but like Orators harangued the People not to instruct but to be admired by them publicly reproaching their Adversaries and venting such new fangled Doctrines as they thought would best please the Multitude From hence necessarily arose those great Contentions Envy and inveterate Hatred which no length of time could asswage T is no wonder then that of the primitive Religion nothing remains but the external worship wherein the People seem rather to Flatter than Adore God Faith is become nothing but credulity and prejudice such as turns rational Men into Brutes by denying them the Liberty of their Judgment to distinguish Truth from Falshood and such as seems purposely invented totally to extinguish the Light of Human Understanding Piety and Religion O immortal God! now consist in absurd Mysteries and they that contemn and reject Human Reason and Knowledge as naturally depraved they forsooth which is strangely irrational must pass for Men divinely illuminated Truly if such Men had but one spark of Divine Light they could not be so superciliously Mad but would learn to Worship God with more Prudence and instead of hating as they now do would love those that differ from them in Opinion and forbearing to prosecute them with so much enmity would rather since they pretend to fear their Salvation more then their own Fortune have pity and compassion upon them Moreover if such Men had any Divine Light it would appear in their Doctrine I confess they pretend they can never enough admire the profound Mysteries of the Scripture yet I cannot perceive they teach any thing but the Speculations of Aristotle and Plato to which that they may not seem followers of the Gentiles they have fitted and accomodated the Scripture and as if it were not enough for these Men to run mad with the Greeks would have the very Prophets also to doat like themselves which clearly shews they never saw the Divinity of the Scripture no not so much as in a dream By how much the more they admire the Mysteries of Scripture so much the more they seem to flatter and sooth Scripture rather than believe it of which likewise another Evidence is that many Men as to the better understanding and finding out the true meaning of Scripture lay it down for a Principal and Fundamental position that the Scripture is of divine inspiration and in every part infallibly true which is the very thing that cannot be made out or proved by any other way but a strict examination and right understanding thereof and do likewise establish it for a rule that in interpreting Scripture which needs no human Glosses the Scripture it self is our best guide When I seriously considered that natural reason was not only contemned but also by many condemn'd for the Fountain of Impiety and human inventions past
is lawful for every Man to think as he pleaseth and to speak what he thinks CHAP. I. Concerning Prophesy PRophesy or Revelation is the true Knowledge of any thing revealed to Men by God and he is a Prophet who declares and expounds those things which God hath revealed to Persons that cannot have any certain knowledge of those Revelations but must therefore only by mere Faith receive and embrace them A Prophet was by the Iews called Nabi that is an Orator or Interpreter as appears in the 7 th chap. of Exodus v. 1 st And the Lord said unto Moses see I have made thee a God to Pharaoh and Aron thy Brother shall be thy Prophet as if he should have said Aron by Interpreting to Pharaoh what thou say'st shall Act the Part of a Prophet and thou the Part of God. We will speak of Prophets in the next Chapter but in this only of Prophesy It follows from the definition which hath been given of it that Natural knowledge may be called Prophesy for those things which we know by the light of nature depend only upon the knowledge of God and his Eternal decrees but because this knowledge is natural to all Mankind being founded upon Principles common to all Men 't is of no value with the vulgar who always affecting things rare and out of their Road despise the Gifts of Nature and therefore whereever mention is made of Prophetical knowledge they totally exclude Natural which may with as much right be called Divine as the other whatever it be seeing the Nature of God of which we participate and the decrees of God dictate it unto us neither doth Natural knowledge differ from that which Men call Divine but only because Divine knowledge exceedeth the Limits of Natural and because the Laws of Humane Nature considered in themselves cannot be the cause of Divine knowledge but Natural knowledge in respect of the certainty which it includes and in respect of the Fountain from whence it proceeds namely from God himself doth in no wise give place to Prophetical knowledge unless some will think or rather dream that the Prophets had Humane Bodies but not Humane Souls and therefore their perceptions and knowledge were of a quite different Nature from ours But though natural knowledge be Divine yet they that possess and propagate it cannot be called Prophtes because the things which they teach may with equal certainty and in as high a degree be Apprehended and Embraced by others as well as by themselves and that too not by Faith only Since therefore our Mind for no other reason but only because it containeth in it self the Nature of God as its Object and also participating thereof is able to Form certain Notions which explicate the Nature of things and teach us the use of Life we may with reason conclude that the Nature of Man's mind being what 't is conceived to be is the prime Cause of Divine Revelation for all those things which we clearly and distinctly understand the Idea of God as we have already shewn and Nature dictate to us not in words but in a much more excellent manner and such as best suites with the Nature of the Mind as every one finds by his own experience who hath but tasted what certain knowledge is but because my cheif purpose is to speak of those things which belong only to the Scripture that little I have said of Natural knowledge shall suffice and I now proceed to other causes and means by which God reveals to Men those things which do exceed and also those which do not exceed the bounds of Natural knowledge for nothing hinders but that those things which we know by the Light of Nature God may by other ways communicate to Men of which now I will more fully Treat But whatsoever is said upon this Subject ought to be fetcht only from Scripture for we can say no more of things that pass our understanding then that which the Prophets have deliver'd to us either by word or writing and because we have not any Prophets that I know in these our days all that we have to do is diligently to peruse the Sacred Volums which the Prophets have left us but still with this caution that we determin nothing positively of things of this Nature nor attribute any thing to the Prophets themselves which they have not plainly spoken and taught But it is in the first place to be observed that the Iews never used to make mention of mediate and particular Causes nor ever regarded them but for the promoting of Religion Piety and Devotion had always recourse to God for Example if they got Money by the Trade of Merchandizing they said God gave it if they earnestly desired to do any thing they said God disposed their Hearts to it if they seriously thought on any thing they said it was declared to them by God so that every thing which the Scripture saith God declared to any one is not to be taken for Prophesy and Supernatural knowledge but that only which the Scripture expresly declares or from the Circumstances of the narration plainly appears to be Prophesy and Revelation If then we run through all the Sacred Volums we shall find that all those things which God revealed to the Prophets were revealed to them either by words or by Figures and Signs or else by both together and that the words and Signs were either real and true without the imagination of the hearing and seeing Prophet or but imaginary that is the fancy and imagination of the Prophet even when he was awake was so disposed that he verily thought he heard words or saw and beheld some thing or sign God in a true and real voice revealed those Laws to Moses which he prescribed to the Iews as appears by the 25 th chap. of Exod. v. 22. where he saith And there will I meet with thee and I will commune with thee from above the mercy Seat from between thee two Cherubims which plainly shews that God made use of some real voice seeing Moses where-ever he pleased found God ready to speak to him and that only this voice by which the Law was Published was a true and real voice I will presently shew One would think that the voice by which God called Samuel was real because in the first Book of Sam. the 3 d. chap. and last verse it is said The Lord appeared again in Shiloh for the Lord revealed himself to Samuel in Shiloh by the word of the Lord as if he had said the appearance of God to Samuel was nothing else but Gods making known himself to him by word or signifyed no more then that Samuel heard God speaking but because we are forced to distinguish between the Prophesy of Moses and that of the other Prophets it must be concluded that the voice heard by Samuel was but imaginary because it was like the voice of Ely which he had so often heard and therefore the sooner
vertuous but concerned only the Election of the Iews that is by what we have proved in the third Chapter the temporal happiness of the Body and peace of their Government and consequently could be of no longer use than while their Government lasted If those Ceremonies in the Old Testament had any relation to God's Law it was only because they were instituted by revelation or upon revealed Principles but because the most solid reason prevails little with ordinary Church-men I will make use of Scripture to shew upon what account and in what manner Ceremonies were useful to the Establishment and Preservation of the Iewish Common-wealth The Prophet Isaiah very plainly declares that by the Divine Law is meant that Universal Law which consists in living uprightly not in Ceremonies Chap. 1 st v. 10. He calleth upon the People to hear the Law of God but tells them in the following Verses that God hated their Sacrifices and Oblations their New Moons their Feasts and their Sabbaths and in the 16. and 17. Verses declares the Law it self to be comprehended in a few Particulars namely in cleansing the Heart in constantly doing well in relieving the Oppressed and no less clear is that Place in the 40 th Psal. v. 7 8. Sacrifice and Offering thou didst not desire mine Ears hast thou opened burnt Offering and Sin Offering hast thou not required Idelight to do thy Will O God for thy Law is within my Heart here David calls that the Law of God which is written in his Heart or inward Parts separated from Ceremonies which not being in their own Nature good are not written in our minds beside these two Places others may be found in Scripture which testify the same thing but there is no need of more Quotations That Ceremonies conduce not to our true Happiness but respect only the temporary Prosperity of Government appears likewise by the Scripture which for the Observation of Ceremonies promised only bodily Benefits but for keeping the Universal Divine Law true Felicity In the Books commonly called the five Books of Moses nothing is promised but temporal Prosperity namely Honour Fame Victory Riches Pleasures and Health and altho' in those five Books are contained beside Ceremonies many things that are Moral yet they are not there contained as Moral Doctrines and Universal instructions common to all but as Commands and Precepts fitted to the particular Capacity and Genius of the Iewish Nation and such as concern'd the prosperous State of that Government for Example Moses did not teach the Iews as a Doctor and Prophet but commanded them as a Lawgiver and Prince that they should not kill or steal nor doth he prove this as Doctrine by Reason but to his Commands adds Punishment which according to the disposition of every Nation as we find by Experience may and ought to vary the Commandment of not committing Adultery respected only the Prosperity of the Commonwealth and its Government for had it been a Moral Doctrine which concern'd the Peace of the mind as well as of the Commonwealth and every particular Man's true felicity it would have as much condemn'd the inward concupiscence of the Heart as the outward act of Lust as Christ did Math. Chap. 5. v. 28. Whose Doctrines were Universal and therefore the reward which Christ promised were Spiritual and not Corporal for Christ was sent not to ordain Laws and Establish Government but only to Preach and Teach the Universal Divine Law and hereby we understand Christ did not Abrogate the Law of Moses seeing he introduced no new Laws into the Iewish Commonwealth but Preached only Moral Doctrines which he distinguisht from the Laws of the Common-wealth because the Pharisees were so Ignorant that they thought every one lived Righteously who kept Moses Law which as we have already said concern'd only that Commonwealth and served rather to compel then instruct the Iews But let us now return to other places of Scripture which for the observing of Ceremonies promise nothing but bodily benefits and for the keeping of the Universal Divine Law true beat tude In this point none of all the Prophets speaks so plainly as Isaiah Chap. 58. for after Condemning Hypocrisy and commending Liberty and Charity towards themselves and their Neighbours which are Vertues dictated to us by the Universal Divine Law he saith Verse the 8 th Then shall thy Light break out as the Morning and thy Health shall spring forth speedily thy Righteousness shall go before thee the Glory of the Lord shall be thy reward Afterwards he commends to them the keeping of the Sabbath and for their care in observing that he promiseth Verse the 24 th Then shalt thou delight thy self in the Lord and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the Earth and feed thee with the Heritage of Jacob thy Father for the Mouth of the Lord hath spoken it by which we plainly see that the Prophet promised to the Practice of the Divine Natural Law a spiritual Reward a sound Mind in a healthful Body and the Glory of God after Death but to the Observation of Ceremonies nothing but the prosperous continuance of their Government and bodily Happiness in the 24 th and 25 th Psalms no mention is made of Ceremonies but only of moral Duties because those Psalms treat of nothing but true Happiness and Beatitude tho' Parabolically propounded for 't is certain that Gods Holy Hill his Tabernacles and dwelling in them with other Blessings mentioned in those Psalms could not litterally signify the Mountain of Ierusalem or the Tabernacle of Moses for they were inhabited by none but the Tribe of Levi who Ministred in the Tabernacle and Temple Moreover all those Sayings of Solomon cited in the preceding Chapter concerning the Excellency of Wisdom and Knowledge promise true Felicity because they teach us to know and fear God that the Iews after the destruction of their Government were not bound to the Observation and Practice of Ceremonies is evident by the Prophet Ieremy who foretelling the approaching destruction of the City of Ierusalem Chap. 9. v. 23 24. declares that none are acceptable to God but they that know him and understand that he exerciseth loving Kindness Judgment and Righteousness in the Earth and that he will delight in none but those that know these things as if the Prophet had said that after the destruction of the City God would for the future require nothing else of the Iews but the Observation of the Natural Law Obligatory to all Mankind The New Testament likewise proves the same thing for it teacheth only Moral Doctrines and promiseth to the Practice of them the Kingdom of Heaven the Apostles after the Gospel began to be Preached to Nations that were not obliged to the Laws of the Iewish Commonwealth quite left off Ceremonies and if the Pharisees after the destruction of their Government retained any or the greatest part of them it was more to oppose the Christians then to please God for after
and clearly appear from the History of Scripture what kind of History it ought to be and what are the Principal things it ought to contain comes now to be declared First it ought to contain the Nature and Proprieties of that Language in which the Books of Scripture were Originally Written and which the Authors of those Books were wont to speak that so all the Senses which every Speech according to the ordinary use of speaking will bear and admit may be found out and because the Pen-Men both of the Old and New Testament were Iews the knowledge of the Hebrew Tongue is above all things necessary to understand not only the Books of the Old Testament which were Written in Hebrew but also of the new for tho' some of the Books of the New Testament were Published in other Languages yet they are full of Hebrewisms Secondly The Sentences of every Book ought to be Collected and reduced to Heads that so all that concern one and the same Subject may be easily found and all those which seem doubtful and obscure or repugnant to one another ought to be noted I call those Speeches clear or obscure whose Sense is easily or difficultly made out by the context and not in respect of the Truth of those Speeches easily or difficultly perceived by reason for only the Sense of what the Scripture saith and not the verity is our business we are therefore to take special heed that in searching out the Sense of Scripture we do not suffer our reason as it is founded upon the Principles of natural knowledge to be prepossest with prejudice and likewise that we do not confound the true Sense of the words with the verity of the matter for the true Sense is to be found out only by the use of the Language or by such a way of reasoning as is grounded only upon Scripture That all these things may be perfectly understood Take this example for illustration These sayings of Moses God is Fire and God is jealous how plain and clear are they so long as we regard only the signification of the words but in respect of reason and truth how dark and obscure yea tho' the litteral Sense of the words be contrary to natural reason yet unless it contradict any fundamental Principles derived from Scripture their litteral Sense is still to be retained so on the contrary if these sayings in their litteral construction should be found repugnant to Principles deduced from Scripture tho' they should be most agreeable to reason yet they ought to be Metaphorically not litteraly understood To know then whether Moses did or did not believe God to be Fire we ought not to conclude the one or the other because the Opinion is either contrary or consonant to reason but it must be gathered from some other of Moses own sayings for example because Moses in very many places hath plainly declared that God is not like any visible thing either in Heaven Earth or the Waters we must conclude that either this saying God is Fire or else all his other sayings are to be Metaphorically interpreted but because we ought as seldom as 't is possible to depart from the litteral Sense we must therefore inquire whether this saying God is Fire will admit of any other Sense beside the litteral that is whether the word Fire signify any other thing beside natural Fire and if in the Hebrew Tongue it can never be found to signify any thing else then this saying of Moses is no other way to be interpreted tho' it be repugnant to reason but on the other side all those other sayings of Moses tho' consentaneous to reason are to be conformable and accomodate to this but if the common use of the Language will not suffer this to be done then those several sayings are Irreconcileable and we are to suspend our judgment of them But now because the Word Fire is also taken for anger and jealousy Iob. chap. 31. v. 12. these sayings of Moses are easily reconcileable and we may lawfully conclude that these two Sentences God is Fire and God is jealous signify both the same thing Moreover because Moses plainly saith God is jealous and doth no where declare that God is free from all manner of passion and affections of the mind we may conclude that Moses did think or at least taught other Men to think God was jealous tho' we believe the opinion contrary to reason for as we have already shewn it is not lawful for us to wrest the Sense and meaning of Scripture according to the dictates of our reason or preconceived Opinions because all our knowledge both of the Old and New Testament must be derived only from themselves Thirdly This History of Scripture ought to give such an account of the Books of the Prophets remaining with us as may inform us of the Lives Manners and Studies of the Authors of every Book who the Person was upon what occasion he wrote in what time to whom and in what Language and Lastly it ought to tell us what was the Fortune of every Book how it was first received into whose hands it fell how many various readings it had how it came to be received for sacred and Canonical And Lastly how all the several Books came together into one Volume I say all these things this History of Scripture ought to contain To know what Sentences of Scripture are to be taken for Laws and precepts and what only for moral Doctrins it is very expedient to know the Life Manners and Study of the Author beside we can with more ease know the meaning of any Mans Words when we know his genius disposition and ingenuity Moreover that we may not confound Doctrins whose morality and Obligation is perpetual with those that were but temporary and of use only to some particular People it behoveth us to know upon what occasion at what time to what Nation in what Age all these instructions were Written Lastly it is fit we should know beside the Authority of every Book whether the Books have been adulterated or at least whether any Errors have crept into them and whether they have been corrected by Learned and Faithful Men all which things are absolutely necessary to be known that we may not with Blind Zeal receive every thing obtruded upon us but believe that only which is certain plain and past all doubt After we have such a History of Scripture and have firmly resolved to conclude nothing to be the Doctrine of the Prophets which doth not naturally follow or may be clearly drawn from this History then it will be time to prepare our selves to search out the meaning of the Prophets and of the Holy Ghost which to do the like method and order is required that is to be used in interpreting nature by its own History for as in searching out natural things we first endeavour to inquire concerning that which is Universal and common to all nature as Motion and
obscurely but that they may be quickly understood according to that usual saying a Word to the Wise. Euclyd who writ of nothing but what is very plain and obvious is easily understood by every Body in any Language and therefore to be sure of his Sense and meaning there is no need of a perfect but only a superficial knowledge of the Tongue wherein he wrote nor of knowing his Life Study Manners in what Language when or to whom he wrote neither knowing the Fate of his Book its various readings or how it came to be generally received what I say of Euclyd may be said of all Men who have written of things in their own nature easy to be understood so that we conclude the meaning of the Scripture and the true Sense thereof concerning moral Doctrins may be easily attained by such a History as might be composed of it For all Lessons of true Piety are given us in words of common and frequent use and are therefore plain and easy to be understood and because our happiness and the peace of our Lives consists in Tranquillity of Mind which we find only in things which we clearly understand it evidently follows that we may certainly find out the meaning of Scripture in things necessary to happiness and Salvation and therefore we need not be so Sollicitous about other matters which when they seem so difficult to our reason and understanding have more curiosity in them then profit I have now shewn what is the true method of explaining Scripture and sully declared my opinion concerning it I doubt not but every one sees this method requires nothing more then natural reason whose Nature and Vertue cheifly consists in deducing by right consequences things obscure from known and indisputable concessions and tho' we grant that this natural light is not sufficient to find out all things in Scripture it is not from any defect in this natural light but because the right way which it shews us was never observed and troden by Men So that in tract of time it is become painful and almost impossible to pass as in my opinion manifestly appears by the difficulties I have mentioned It now remains that I examin those Mens opinions who are not of mine the first to be considered is theirs who positively affirm that natural light is not sufficient to interpret Scripture and that only Supernatural light can do it but what they mean by Supernatural light I leave them to explain I suppose they do but in obscure terms confess that they are very doubtful of the true Sense of Scripture for if we diligently consider their expositions we shall find they contain nothing Supernatural yea they will appear to be meer conjectures if they be compared with their explanations who pretend to nothing more then what is natural they will be found like them to be human long Studied and Elaborate In maintaining that natural light is not able to explain Scripture they are mistaken what we have said makes it clear that the difficulty of expounding Scripture doth not arise from any defect of strength in natural light but only from Mens sloth I will not say malice who have neglected to Compose such a History of Scripture as might have been framed of it and also because all Men if I be not deceived confess that Supernatural light is a divine gift bestowed only upon believers but the Prophets and Apostles Preached not only to believers but to wicked unbelievers who were notwithstanding their impiety and unbelief capable of understanding the meaning of the Prophets otherwise they had Preached but to Children and Infants and not to Men endued with reason and Moses had in vain prescribed Laws if his Laws were intelligible only to believers who needed no Law. Wherefore they that seek after supernatural light to understand the mind of the Prophets and Apostles seem void even of natural light and such I think are far from having that Heavenly Gift of light supernatural Maimonides was not of these Mens Opinion for he thought most places of Scripture would bear several yea contrary Senses and thought likewise that we cannot be certain of the true Sense of any place unless we know the place as we interpret it to contain nothing but what is agreeable to reason or not contrary to it for if in its litteral Sense it appear repugnant to reason tho' the Sense appear clear yet he thinks the place ought to be otherwise interpreted and this he plainly declares in the 25 th Chapter of his Book called More Nebuchin where he saith know that I do not refuse to say the World is eternal because there are Texts in Scripture which say the World was created for the Texts which declare the World was created are not more then those that tell us God is Corporeal neither are the ways of expounding those Texts concerning the Creation of the World Shut up or barred against us but we could as well explain them as I did the other when I proved God to be incorporeal perhaps I could better and with more ease expound the Texts of the Worlds Creation and maintain the World to be eternal then I did those of Gods corporiety when I proved God to be incorporeal but for two reasons I will not do it or believe that the World is eternal First because it is evident by a clear Demonstration that God is not Corporeal for all places of Scripture whose litteral Sense is repugnant to a Demonstration require explication because it is certain they ought not to be taken litterally but the eternity of the World is not proved by any Demonstration and therefore it is not necessary to offer violence to the Scripture and wrest it by expositions to maintain an opinion that is but probable when we may with any reason maintain the contrary opinion The second reason is because believing God to be incorporeal is not contrary to the Fundamentals of the Law but to believe the eternity of the World as Aristotle did destroyeth the very Foundation of the Law. These are the Words of Maimonides from which that manifestly follows which I said before for if he were convinced by reason that the World was eternal he would not scruple to wrest the Scripture and make such expositions of it as might support that opiuion and he would be presently certain that the Scripture tho' it every where plainly say the contrary did declare the World to be eternal and consequently could never be certain of the true Sense of Scripture tho' never so plain so long as he doubted the Truth of the thing or that the Truth were not evident to him for so long as the Truth of a thing is not apparent we are so long ignorant whether the thing be agreeable or contrary to reason and consequently we know not whether the litteral Sense be true or false which opinion if it were true I would absolutely grant that some other light beside what is natural is necessary
Covenant with the Lord Iosh. chap. 24. v. 25 26. but because we have no Book extant either of the Covenant of Moses or Ioshua it must necessarily be granted that the Book perished unless we will be as mad as the Chaldee Paraphrast Ionatan and wrest the Scripture as we please for he being prest with this difficulty chose rather to corrupt the Scripture then confess his Ignorance for those words in the 26. v. of the 24. chap. of Iosh. Joshua wrote these words in the Book of the the Law of God c. he render'd thus in his Chaldee Translation And Ioshua wrote these words and kept them with the Book of the Law of God there is no medling with Men who will see nothing but what they list is not this denying what is Scripture and forging new at our pleasure We then conclude that this Book of the Law of God was not the Pentateuk but quite another which the Author of the Pentateuk hath orderly interwoven with his work as appears by what hath been and shall be further said where the forecited place in Deutronomy saith that Moses wrote a Book of the Law the Historian adds that he delivered it to the Priests and commanded them at certain set times to read it before all the People which implyes that the Book must be much less then the Pentateuk seeing at one meeting it might be read all over and understood by the People nor can we here forbear to observe that of all the Books Written by Moses this only of the second Covenant and his Song which he afterwards Writ for all the People to Learn he commanded to be Religiously kept because the first Covenant obliged only those that were present and the second not only all present but their posterity also Deut. chap. 29. v. 14 15. He therefore commanded this Book of the second Covenant to be carefully and Religiously preserved to future Ages and also his Song because future Ages were chiefly concern'd in it Seeing then it is not evident that Moses ever writ any Books beside the Book of the Law and his Song which he commanded to be kept and that many things in the Pentateuk could not be Written by him I conclude that no Man can upon any good ground but must altogether against reason make Moses the Author of the Pentateuk but some body may perhaps here ask whether Moses besides these Books did not write the Laws when they were first revealed to him that is whether in the space of forty Years he did not set down in Writing any of those Laws which he prescribed beside those few contain'd in the Book of the first Covenant to this I answer that tho' I should grant it to be very agreeable to reason that Moses should commit to Writing those Laws which he Communicated to the People at the same time and place when and where they were publisht yet I deny that it is lawful upon this Ground to affirm he did for I have already shewn we ought in like Cases to determin nothing but what is manifestly proved either by Scripture it self or by consequences drawn from the Principles of it and not because a thing seems Consonant to Reason for Reason it self doth not oblige us to be possitive It may be the Senate of Seventy Elders communicated to the People Moses's Edicts in writing which were afterwards collected by him that writ the Pentateuk and were orderly inserted into the History of Moses's Life and so much for the five Books of Moses It is now time to examin the rest the Book of Ioshuah for like Reasons could not be written by Ioshua it must be some other Person that gives so good a Character of him in several places of that Book Iosh. Chap. 6. v. 27. The Lord was with Ioshua and his Fame was noised throughout all the Country that he omitted nothing but did all that Moses commanded Chap. 8. v. 35. Chap. 11. v. 15. That he waxed Old called all the People together and at last dyed Moreover some things are related which happen'd after his Death namely that the People continued to worship God as long as the Old men lived who knew Ioshua In the 16. Chap. v. 10. It is said that Ephraim and Manasseh did not drive out the Cananites that dwelt in Gezur but the Cananites dwell among the Ephramites to this day and serve under Tribute Which is the same Expression we find in the first chap. of Iudges v. 21. But the Iebuzites dwell with the Children of Benjamin in Ierusalem unto this day Which manner of speaking implies the Writer relates what was long ago past as appears Iosh. Chap. 15. Verse the last the Iebuzites dwell with the Children of Iudah unto this day The same Expression is likewise used in the History of Kaleb beginning at the 13 th Verse of the said Chapter The building of an Altar beyond Iordan by the two Tribes and a half mention'd in the 22. Iosh. v. 10. In all Probability happen'd after Ioshuah's Death because in all that story there is not so much as one word said of him but the People only deliberated to make War sent Embassadors received and approved the Answer which was returned Lastly it appears by the 14 th Verse of the 10 th Chap. That the Book of Ioshua was written many Ages after his Death for the Text saith and there was no day like that before or after it that the Lord hearkened to the Voice of a Man If then Ioshua writ any Book it must be that of Iasher mentioned in the same story v. the 13 th As for the Book of Iudges I believe no Man in his right Wits will think it written by the Iudges themselves for the end of the History in the 2 d. Chap. clearly shews it was all written by one single Person who tells us in many places that in those days there was no King in Israel which is an argument it was written in a Time when the People had Kings Concerning the Books of Samuel there needs no deliberation seeing the History is carried on so far beyond his death but however let this be observed that this Book must be written many Ages after him for the Hestorian in the 1 st Book of Sam. Chap. 9. v. 9. saith in a parenthesis Before time in Israel when a Man went to inquire of God thus he spake come let us go to the Seer for he that is now called a Prophet was before time called a Seer The two Books of the Kings as appears by the Books themselves were collected out of what was written of the Reign of Solomon see the 1 st Book of Kings chap. 11. v. 5. And out of the Chronicles both of the Kings of Iudah and Israel chap. 14. v. 19 29. The rest of the Acts of Ieroboam how he warred and how he reigned behold they are written in the Books of the Chronicles of the Kings of Iudah We therefore conclude that all the Books which
we have named were written long after the Matters of Fact happen'd which they relate If we consider the Connexion and Subject of these Books we shall quickly find that they were all written by one and the same Historian who designed to write the Antiquities of the Iews from their first Original to the first destruction of Ierusalem for the Books are by connexion so linked together that they seem to be but the single Narration of one Historian for as soon as he hath done with the Life of Moses he begins the next Book with these words Now after the Death of Moses the Servant of the Lord it came to pass that the Lord spake unto Ioshuah And ending the story of Ioshuah with his Death he doth with the very same Transition and Conjunction begin the Book of Iudges in these words Now after the Death of Ioshuah it came to pass that the Children of Israel asked the Lord And to this Book of Iudges as an Appendix he joyneth the Book of Ruth in these words Now it came to pass in the days when the Iudges ruled that there was a Famin in the Land. To which Book of Ruth he doth in the same manner joyn the first Book of Samuel that ended with his wonted Transition he goes on to the Second Book and to this the History of David not being fully endded he joyns the first Book of Kings then going on with David's History addeth with his usual Connexion the Second Book The context and Order of the Histories likewise declare the Historian to be but one Person who propounded to himself one certain end for he begins with the Original of the Iewish Nation then in order shews upon what occasion and at what time Moses prescribed Laws and Prophesyed many things to them afterward he relates how they invaded the Land of Promise according to Moses's predictions Deut. Chap. 7. And when they had possest it how they would forsake God's Laws Deut. Chap. 31. v. 16. And what evils should thereupon follow verse 17. Next he declares how they would chuse Kings Deut. Chap. 17. v. 14. Whose Affairs should succeed well or ill according to the care they took in observing the Laws Deut. Chap. 28. v. 36 68. And Lastly concludes with the ruin of their Government as Moses foretold Of things which served litle to the Establishment of the Law he said nothing or else refers the Reader to other Authors so that all these Books conspire in this one thing namely the publishing the Prophesies and Edicts of Moses and making them good by what after happen'd The simplicity and plainness of the Subject of all the Books the connexion of them and their being written many Ages after the things done is argument enough to perswade any Man that they were all written by one Historian but who he was I cannot evidently prove I have some Reasons and those of some weight to think it was Esdras seeing the Historian whom we now know to be one Person carries on the History as far as Iehoiachim's deliverance out of Prison and moreover adds that he sate at the King's Table all his Life which must be either the Table of King Iehoiachim or of the Son of Nebuchadnezzar for the Sense is very dubious It follows that it could not be any one before Esdras the Scripture saith of Esdras without mentioning any other Person Ezra Chap. 7. v. 10. That he had prepared his Heart to seek the Law of the Lord to do it and Verse 6 th That he was a ready Scribe in the Law of Moses So that I cannot conjecture any body but Esdras should write those Books in the Testimony given of him we find that he did not only seek the Law of God but that he likewise explain'd it Nehem. Chap. 8. v. 8. Where it is said that they read in the Book of the Law of God distinctly and gave the Sense thereof and caused them to understand the Reading Now because in the Book of Deutronomy not only the Book of the Law of Moses at least a great part of it is contained but also many things are inserted for the better explication thereof I conjecture The Book of Deutronomy to be that Book of the Law of God written set forth and expounded by Esdras which they then read and that many things are put in by Way of Parenthesis more clearly to explain it We gave you several instances when I unfolded Aben-Ezras meaning there are more of the like kind as appears Deut. Chap. 2. v. 12. The Horites also dwelt in Seir before time but the Children of Esau succeeded them when they had destroyed them from before them and dwelt in their stead as Israel did unto the Land of his Possession which the Lord gave unto them This explains the 3 d. and 4 th Verses of the same Chapter namely that Mount Seir which was the Inheritance of the Sons of Esau was not found by them uninhabited but that they invaded the Horites who first dwelt there and having subdued destroyed them as the Children of Israel did the Cananites after the Death of Moses likewise in the 10 th Chapter it is evident that the 6 7 8 and 9. verses are interposed by Way of Parenthesis with the Words of Moses for the 8 th Verse which begins in these words at that time the Lord separated the Tribe of Levi must necessarily have reference to the 5 th Verse which speaks of Moses coming down from the Mount and putting the Tables into the Ark and not to the death of Aron mentioned in the 6 th Verse Of which Esdras spake here for no other Reason but because Moses in the story of the Golden Calf which the People worshipt said in the 9 th Chap. v. 20. That he prayed for Aron The Historian goes on and declares that God at that time of which Moses speaks chose for himself the Tribe of Levi that he might shew the Cause of their Election and also why the Levites had no Part or Inheritance with their Brethren this done in the words of Moses he follows the thred of the History If we consider the Preface of the Book and all the Places which speak of Moses in the Third Person and many other things which cannot now be known which he added or exprest in other words that they might be the better understood by those that lived in his time without doubt had we the very Book of the Law which Moses wrote we should find that all the Commandments very much differ not only in words but in Order Matter and Sense Compare the Decalogue of this Book with that in Exodus where it is expresly set down we shall find this to vary from that for the Fourth Commandment in Deutronomy is not only commanded in another Form but is enlarged and the Reason of it likewise differs much from that in Exodus so that this as in other Places was done by Esdras because he explained the Law of God to
those that lived in his days and therefore 't is likely this was the Book of the Law of God which he set forth and expounded and I likewise believe it the first of all those Books he wrote because it contains the Laws of his Country which the People extreamly wanted and also because this Book is with no Antecedent Connexion joyned to another but without any kind of reference begins thus These be the Words of Moses And after he finished this Book and taught the People the Laws I believe he applyed himself to compose the whole History of the Iewish Nation from the Creation of the World to the first Destruction of the City Ierusalem inserting this Book of Deutronomy in its proper Place and perhaps to the first five Books gave the Name of Moses because his Life is the Principal Subject of them for the same reason he called the Sixth Book by the Name of Ioshuah the Seventh Iudges the Eighth Ruth the Ninth and perhaps the Tenth Samuel the Eleventh and Twelfth Kings but whether Esdras perfected them as he desired with his own Hand inquire in the next Chapter CHAP. IX Whether Esdras perfected the Books which we suppose he wrote and whether the Marginal Notes which are found in the Hebrew Copies be divers readings HOW much the inquiry made in the former Chapter concerning the Pen-Man of the Books therein mentioned may conduce to the perfect understanding of them will be easily guess'd by those Places only which we have quoted to make good our Opinion in this Point which places would otherwise have seemed very obscure but beside the Writer there are other things observable in the Books themselves which Common Superstition will not suffer the vulgar to discern The cheifest of them is that Esdras whom I will suppose to be the Writer of the foresaid Books till some body shew me another more likely to pen them did not with his own Hand perfect the Relations which the Books contain but did only collect the Histories out of several writers and sometimes only copying them out left them to Posterity neither examin'd nor put into any Order but what should hinder him from compleatly finishing his Work unless it were untimely death I cannot conjecture we have indeed no Antient intire Iewish Histories but out of a few fragments left us it is evident that Esdras as I have already said gather'd his stories from several Writers and left them very confused and imperfect The History of Ezekiah as it is found written from the Relation of Isaiah the Prophet in the Second Book of Kings chap. 18. v. 17. is recorded in the Chronicles of the Kings of Iudah and the story in the Chronicles see Book the 2 d. Chap. 32. v. 32. We find related almost in the same words very few excepted as it is in the forenamed Chapter of the Book of Kings from whence nothing else can be concluded but that there were divers readings of Isaiah's Relation unless some will also here dream of Misteries Moreover the last Chapter of this Book of the Kings is contained in the last Chapter of the Prophet Ieremy and we find likewise the 7 th Chap. of the Second Book of Samuel in the 17 th Chap. of the first Book of Chronicles but the words in divers places so much changed that it may be easily known the two Chapters were taken out of two different Copies of the History written by the Prophet Nathan Lastly The Genealogy of the Kings of Edom which we have Gen. Chap. 36. from v. 31 th Is set down in the same words in the 1 st Chap. of the 1 st Book of Chron. Beginning at the 43 th Verse Now tho' it be evident that the Author of the Book of Chronicles took the things which he related out of other Historians yet he had them not out of the Twelve Books which we believe were written by Esdras and without doubt had we the Original Histories it would so appear but because we have them not let us examin the Histories as they now are observing their Order and Connexion their various Repetitions and their disagreement in Calculation of Time that we may judge of other things Consider first the History of Iudah and Thamar Gen. Chap. 38. The Historian begins his Narration in these words And it came to pass at that time that Iudah went down from his Brethren Which time must necessarily have reference to some other time of which he had immediately spoken before but to that time spoken of in the preceding Chapter of Genesis it could have no Relation for from the time that Ioseph was carried into Egypt until Iacob the Patriarch went down thither with all his Family there passed but twenty two Years for Ioseph when he was Sold by his Brethren was but Seventeen Years Old and when he was sent for out of Prison by Pharaoh but Thirty to which if the Seven Years of Plenty and Two of Famin be added they make up in all no more than Two and Twenty in which space of time no Man can conceive so many things should happen namely that Iudah should successively have three Sons of which the Eldest should at a fit Age marry Thamar and he dying the Second Brother should take her to Wife who also dyed and that sometime after this happen'd Iudah himself should ignorantly lye with his own Daughter in-Law Thamar and have two Children by her at one Birth whereof one likewise should within the aforesaid time of two and twenty Years become a Father Seeing then all these things cannot be referr'd to the time spoken of in Genesis but must necessarily relate to some other time spoken of in some other Book Esdras must therefore only Copy out this Story and unexamin'd add it to others but not only this Chapter but likewise the whole Story of Ioseph and Iacob must necessarily be taken out of several Historians so little congruity is there in it for the 48 th Chap. of Gen. tells us that when Ioseph brought his Father Iacob to Pharaoh Iacob was an hundred and thirty Years Old from which deduct twenty two which he passed in Mourning for the loss of Ioseph and seventeen which was Ioseph's Age when he was Sold with seven which he served for Rachel it will appear that he was fourscour and four Years Old when he Marryed Leah and that on the other side Dinah was scarce seven Years Old when she was Ravisht by Sechem and Simeon and Levi not fully eleven and twelve Years of Age when they Assaulted the City of Sechem and put all the People of it to the Sword. There is no need of particularizing all things of this kind in the Pentateuk if this only be consider'd that in the five Books all the Precepts and Historical Relations are promiscuously set down without any order without any regard had to time and that one and the same History is often and sometimes diversly repeated it must be granted that all these things were
some are more and others less in Nehemiah than they are in Ezra and amount in all to thirty one thousand eighty nine so that there is no doubt but that the errors as well in the Book of Ezra as of Nehemiah were in the particular numbers Commentators rack their Wits and Inventions to reconcile these apparent contradictions and while they adore the very Words and Letters of Scripture do nothing as we have already said but expose the Writers of the Bible to Contempt as if they knew not how to speak or put that which was spoken by them into any order yea they do nothing but make that part of Scripture which is plain obscure For if every Man should take a liberty of explaining Scripture as they do we could not be sure of the true sense of any part thereof I am perswaded those Commentators themselves tho' they with so much zeal excuse the Writers of the Old Testament would count any other Man a ridiculous Historian who should write as they have done and if they think him a Blasphemer who says the Scripture is in some places faulty what shall I say of those Men who bely the Scripture and so expose the holy Pen-men thereof as if they knew not how to speak and deny the plain and clear sense of Scripture What in it can be plainer than that Esdras and his fellow Priests in the second Chapter of that Book which is said to be his took a particular account of all that went up to Ierusalem seeing the number of them is set down who could not derive their Pedigree as well as theirs that could And what is more clear than that Nehemiah as appears by the 7 th chap. and 5 th verse of that Book only copy'd out the Register which Esdras had made Who ever makes any other Exposition thereof denies the true sense of Scripture and consequently the Scripture it self 'T is ridiculous Piety to pretend to rectify one place of Scripture by another when plain places are darkened by obscure and those that are right and true corrected and corrupted by those that are false and erroneous but God forbid I should call them Blasphemers who have no malicious intentions because there is no Man free from Error Beside the Errors which are in the particular numbers both of Esdras and Nehemiah's Genealogy there are divers in the names of the Families more in the very Pedigrees in the Histories and I fear likewise in the very Prophesies themselves for the Prophesie of Ieremy in the 22 th chap. against Iehoiachim which says He should be buried with the burial of an Ass drawn and cast forth beyond the Gates of Ierusalem doth not at all agree with the History of him in the last Chapter of the 2 d. Book of Kings no nor with what is related of him in the last Chapter of Ieremy especially in the last Verse neither do I see any reason why Ieremy should tell King Zedechiah that he should die in peace Ierem. chap. 34. v. 5. who was taken Captive and after he had seen his Children slain before his Face had his own Eyes put out If Prophesies may be interpreted according to events the names of those two Kings seem to be mistaken one for the other but that is too paridoxical to be maintain'd and I had rather leave the point under an impossibility of being determin'd seeing if there be any error in it it must be the fault of the Historian and not in the Original Copies from whence he wrote Of any other Errors I will take no particular notice seeing I cannot without troubling the Reader because they have been already noted by others Rabbi Solomon finding the manifest contradictions which are in the erroneous Genealogies doth in his Commentaries on the 8 th chap. of the first Book of Chronicles break out into these words Esdras whom he supposeth to have written the Chronicles called the Sons of Benjamin by wrong names and deriv'd his Pedigree otherwise than we find it in the Book of Genesis and describes the greatest part of the Cities of the Levites otherwise than Joshua did because he met with different Originals And a little after saith The Genealogy of Gibeon and others is twice and diversly repeated because Esdras found different Registers of each Genealogy and in copying them out follow'd those whereof the greater number did agree but when the number of differing Genealogies was equal he wrote after the Original of both So that it appears by Rabbi Solomon's own confession these Books were copied from uncertain and imperfect Originals The Commentators themselves many times do nothing more than shew the causes of the errors and I believe that no person of any sound Judgment can think that the Sacred Historians did write purposely to contradict themselves Perhaps it will be said I go about to overthrow the Scripture and give occasion to suspect that it is every where faulty but I have prov'd the contrary for I hereby vindicate the Scripture and provide against the adulterating and corrupting thereof in those places which are clear and true It doth not follow that because some places are faulty therefore all must be so because every Book is in some places false 't is no good ground to conclude it is no where true especially when the Stile of it is perspicuous and the meaning of the Author perfectly known So much for the Books of the Old Testament Now by what hath been said we may easily conclude that before the time of Iudas Macchâ—bâ—us no Books were esteemed Canonical but those which we now have from the Pharisees of the Second Temple who likewise instituted set forms of Prayer these Books being selected from many others and only by their Decree receiv'd into the Canon he therefore that will demonstrate the Authority of Holy Scripture is bound to prove the Authority of every particular Book the proving any one to be Divine is not enough to prove the Divinity of all unless it be granted that the Council of the Pharisees could not err which is impossible for any Man to make good the reason which inclines me to believe that none but the Pharisees chose the Books of the Old Testament and made them Sacred by Canon is because the last Chapter of Daniel declares That there shall be a Resurrection of the Dead which the Zadduces utterly deny'd Moreover in the Treatise of the Sabbath chap. 2. fol. 30. parag the 2 d Rabbi Iehuda says The learned in the Law endeavour'd to suppress the Book of Ecclesiastes because many expressions in it were contrary which observe to the Books of the Law of Moses but the reason why it was not suppress'd was because it begun and ended according to the Law A little after he saith They would also have conceal'd the Book of Proverbs and lastly in the first Chapter of the same Treatise fol. 13 th these are his words Truly I name the Man for kindness sake had it not been for
Supernatural Illumination to fit and apply Religion which they had before confirm'd by Signs to every Man 's ordinary Capacity that it might be readily embraced nor was Supernatural Assistance necessary to mind Men of it the design and end of all the Epistles is to teach and admonish Men to live that kind of life which every one of the Apostles judg'd best to confirm and establish them in Religion and here we are to remember what was said a little before That the Apostles were not only enabled to preach the History of Christ and confirm what they preach'd by Signs as Prophets but had also Power and Authority to admonish and instruct Men in that way which every particular Apostle thought best both which gifts Paul mentions in his 2 d Epist. to Timothy chap. 1. v. 11. Whereunto I am appointed a Preacher and an Apostle and teacher of the Gentiles Likewise in his 1 st Epist. to Timothy chap. 2. v. 7. Whereunto I am ordain'd a Preacher and an Apostle I speak the truth in Christ and lie not a teacher of the Gentiles in Faith and Verity which Texts clearly prove both his Offices of Apostle and Doctor but his Authority to warn and instruct whomsoever and whensoever he pleas'd he expresly declares in his Epistle to Philemon verses the 8 th and 9 th Tho' I might be much bold in Christ to enjoyn thee that which is convenient yet for loves sake I rather beseech thee whence we are to note that if those things which Paul was to command Philemon had been receiv'd from God by Paul as a Prophet and which as a Prophet he ought to have commanded him then it had not been lawful for Paul to change that Command of God into Intreaties it must therefore be necessarily understood that Paul here speaks of the liberty of Warning and Admonishing which he had as a Teacher and not as a Prophet Tho' it be not clearly prov'd that every Apostle might chuse that way of teaching which he himself thought best but only that they were both Prophets and Teachers by vertue of their Apostleship yet Reason tells us that whoever hath Power and Authority to teach hath also Power and Liberty to chuse his own way of doing it but because it will be more satisfactory to prove by Scripture that every Apostle chose his own particular way of teaching Consider what Paul himself saith in his Epistle to the Romans chap. 15. v. 20. So have I strived to preach the Gospel not where Christ was named lest I should build upon another mans foundation if every one of the Apostles made use of the same way of teaching and all built Christian Religion upon the same Foundation what reason had Paul to call those Foundations another Mans It must necessarily be concluded that every one built Religion upon a several Foundation and it was with the Apostles as it is with other Doctors who having a peculiar method of teaching desire alway to teach those who are perfectly ignorant and never learnt of any other Master If we carefully read over the Epistles we shall find that the Apostles did agree concerning Religion it self but differ'd about its Foundations To establish Men in Religion and to prove that Salvation depended only upon the Grace and Mercy of God Paul's Doctrine was that no Man ought to boast of his Works but only of his Faith and that no Man could be justify'd by Works but only by Faith Rom. chap. 3. v. 27 28. By Paul also was preached the whole Doctrine of Predestination but Iames on the other side in his Epistle declares that a Man is justify'd by Works and not by Faith only Iames chap. 2. v. 24. and in few words gives a brief account of Religion not at all concerning himself with any of Paul's Disputations Without doubt the Apostles building Religion upon several Foundations hath been the original cause of all those Controversies and Schisms wherewith the Church was in the Apostles time hath been ever since and for ever will be troubled unless Religion be purg'd and separated from all Philosophical Speculations and reduced to those few and plain Doctrines which Christ taught his Followers which was impossible to be done by the Apostles themselves because Men then knew not the Gospel and because the novity of its Doctrine should not offend their Ears they as near as possible suited and fitted it to the Genius and Disposition of Men in that time as appears by the 1 st Epist. to the Corinth chap. 9. v. 19 20. and was built upon the most known Foundations and receiv'd Principles of those times therefore none of the Apostles philosophiz'd so much as Paul who was called to preach to the Gentiles the rest preaching to the Iews who were despisers of Philosophy likewise apply'd themselves to their Genius see the Epist. to the Galath chap. 2. from the 11 verse forward and preach'd Religion strip'd naked from all Philosophical Speculations How happy likewise would our times be could we see Religion freed from all Superstition CHAP. XII Of the true Original Hand-writing of the Divine Law why Scripture is called Holy and why the Word of God Lastly That the Scripture as it contains the Word of God is derived down to us pure and uncorrupted THey that look upon the Bible however it be as a Letter sent from Heaven by God to Man will certainly exclaim and say I am guilty of the sin against the Holy Ghost in maintaining that the Word of God is faulty maimed adulterated and contradictory to it self that we have but fragments of it and that the Original Writing of the Covenant which God made with the Iews perish'd but I doubt not would they well consider the thing it self they would cease their exclamations for Reason as well as the Opinion of the Prophets and Apostles plainly declares That the Eternal Word and Covenant of God and true Religion is written in Mens Hearts that is imprinted by God upon the Mind and Understanding of mankind which is that true Hand-writing of God which he sealed with the Idea of himself that is the Image of his own Divine Nature Religion was first deliver'd to the Iews as a written Law because they were at that time in their Understanding little more than Children but afterwards Moses Deut. chap. 30. v. 6. and Ieremy chap. 31. v. 33. prophesied that in time to come God would write his Law in their Hearts so that the Iews and among them chiefly the Zaduces always contended for their Law written in Tables which others did not who had it engraven on their Hearts He then that considers this will find nothing in what I have said contrary to God's word or that will weaken Faith and Religion but rather as I have shewed toward the end of the tenth Chapter what will confirm and strengthen both Had not that been my intention I had been altogether silent upon this Subject and to avoid disputes would have freely granted that there
of Stone but in the fleshly Tables of the Heart Let Men cease to adore the Letter and not be so much concern'd for it Having sufficiently explain'd the Holiness and Divinity of Scripture let us now see what is properly meant by Debar Iehovah the word of God. Debar signifies Word Speech Decree Thing now upon what grounds any thing in the Hebrew Language may be said to be God's or have relation to God I have shew'd in the first Chapter so that I need not repeat what I have there said or in the sixth Chapter what I have said of Miracles 't is evident what the Scripture means by the Word of God To make the thing very clear I need only declare that when the Word of God is predicated of any Subject which is not God himself it properly signifies that Divine Law of which we treated in the fourth Chapter namely That Religion which is universal and common to all mankind mention'd in Isaiah chap. 1. v. 10. where the Prophet declares That the right way of living consisted in Charity and in a sincere and pure Heart which he calls the Law and Word of God The Word of God is also taken Metaphorically for the order or course of Nature and Fate because it follows and depends upon the Eternal Decree of the Divine Nature particularly for whatever the Prophets foresaw in this course of Nature because the Prophets understood future events not by natural Causes but thought them to be the Will and Decrees of God. Moreover it is taken for that which any Prophet commanded or declared because he knew it not by Natural Light but by the singular Vertue and gift of Prophesie and more especially because the Prophets as we have shewed in the fourth Chapter apprehended God under the notion of a Lawgiver for these three reasons then the Scripture is called the Word of God namely because it teacheth us true Religion whereof God from all Eternity is the Author Secondly because it makes Prophesies to be God's Decrees And lastly because the Authors of those Prophesies taught for the most part that which they did not know by Natural Reason but by a faculty and gift peculiar only to them and introduced God speaking as it were in them Now tho' the Scripture contain many things which are meerly Historical and may be unnderstood by Natural Knowledge yet the Scripture is called the Word of God in respect of those other particulars I have last mention'd so that now we plainly see why God is called the Author of the Bible namely upon the account of teaching us what is true Religion and not because it contains and hath communicated to us such a certain number of Books And hence we may also learn that the Bible is divided into the Old and New Testament because before the coming of Christ the Prophets Preached Religion as the Law of their Country and by force of the Covenant made in Moses's time but after Christ's coming because the Apostles preached Religion upon Christ's account as a Law universal to all mankind not that the Prophets and Apostles differ'd in Doctrine or that the Books of either Testament are the Deeds and Indentures of the Written Covenant nor lastly because Natural Religion which is universal is new unless it be in respect of those that knew it not according to that saying of Iohn the Evangelist chap. 1. v. 10. He was in the world and the world knew him not If then we had not some of those Books which the Old and New Testament contain yet we should not want God's Word as it properly signifies true Religion for we do not think any part thereof is wanting tho' we lack many of those other excellent Writings namely the Book of the Law which was so Religiously kept in the Temple as the Original wherein the Covenant was first written with many other Books of the Wars and Records of time from whence the Books of the Old and New Testament which we now have were transcribed and collected And this is made good by many reasons first because the Books of both Testaments were not written at one and the same time for the use of all Ages but by chance for some particular people and that as the Time and their particular Disposition requir'd which plainly appears by the calling of the Prophets who are called to warn and reprove the ungodly of their own time and also by the Writings of the Apostles Secondly Because understanding the Scripture and the meaning of the Prophets is one thing but to understand the Mind of God that is the real truth of things is another as appears by what hath been said in the second Chapter of Prophets which distinction likewise holds in Histories and Miracles as we have shewed in the sixth Chapter But in understanding places which treat of true Religion and real Vertue no such distinction ought to be made Thirdly Because the Books of the Old Testament were chosen out of many others and were approved and joyned together by a Council of the Pharisees as we have declared in the tenth Chapter and for the Books of the New Testament they were receiv'd into the Canon by the Decrees of certain Councils when several other Books by many accounted Sacred were rejected as Spurious These Councils both of Pharisees and Christians were made up of Men who were no Prophets but only learned Doctors yet it must necessarily be granted that in this choice they made the Word of God their Rule so that before they gave their Approbation to the Books they ought to know what was the Word of God. Fourthly Because as we have shewed in the preceding Chapter the Apostles did not write as Prophets but only as Teachers and chose that way of instructing which every one judged most easie for his Disciples from whence it follows as we have concluded in the end of the said Chapter that their Writings contain many things whereof in Respect to Religion we have no absolute need Fifthly and lastly Because in the New Testament there are four whom we call Evangelists but who believes it was God's express Will that the History of Christ should be four times told and deliver'd to Men in Writing Tho' things may be contain'd in one which are not in another and that one helps to understand another we must not therefore conclude that all things which the four declare are absolutely necessary to be known and that God made choice of them to write purposely that the History of Christ might be the better understood for every one preach'd his own Gospel in several places and every one wrote what he preach'd plainly that he might the more faithfully relate the History of Iesus Christ and not for any explanation to the rest If by mutually comparing them together they are sometâ—mes more easily and better understood that happens by chance and only in very few places of which tho' we were ignorant the History notwithstanding would be very perspicuous and
Men nevertheless blessed and happy Having shewed that the Scripture in respect of Religion only and the universal Divine Law is properly called Scripture It now remains to prove that in this respect and as it is properly so call'd it is neither maimed faulty or corrupted and here I call that thing faulty maimed and corrupted which is so falsely written and compos'd that the true sense of the words cannot either by the use of the Language or by the Scripture it self be found out for I do not affirm that the Scripture as it contains the Divine Law always observes the same letters points accents and words I leave that to the Masorites who so superstitiously adore the Letter but only that the signification and sense in respect of which only any Speech is to be called Divine is derived to us uncorrupted tho' the words whereby that sense was signified have been often changed that cannot as we have said detract from the Sacredness of Scripture for it would not have been one jot less Divine had it been written in other Words or in any other Language That we have received the Divine Law in this respect uncorrupted no body can question for by the Scripture it self without any doubt or difficulty we perceive that the summ thereof is to love God above all things and our Neighbours as our selves This cannot be adulterated nor written by a too hasty erring Pen for if the Scripture ever taught any other thing it must necessarily teach all other things otherwise seeing this is the Foundation of all Religion take away this Foundation and the whole Fabrick falls to the ground and if this were not so the Scripture were not Scripture but quite another Book It remains then without Controversie this was always the Doctrine of Scripture and consequently that no error could creep into it to corrupt its Sense which would have been quickly perceiv'd by every body and who ever had gone about to corrupt it his Malice would have presently appear'd If then this Foundation be immoveable and incorruptible the same must be concluded of other things which indisputably follow from it and which are also fundamentals as that God is that he provides for all that he is Omnipotent and that he hath decreed it shall go well with Good and ill with Wicked-men and that our Salvation depends only upon his Grace and Mercy These things the Scripture every where plainly teacheth and ought always to teach else all other things were vain and without any Foundation 'T is as impossible to corrupt any other Moral Doctrines which are built upon and evidently follow from this Foundation namely to do justice to succour those that are in want and distress not to kill not to covet and none of these moral Precepts can be mis-interpreted or corrupted by malice or obliterated by length of time If any of these things should be blotted out they would be again dictated to mankind by the first general Foundation and more especially by the Doctrine of Charity which is every where so much commended in the Old and New Testament Should it be granted that there is no wickedness which ever entred into the Heart of Man which some person or other hath not committed yet never was there any Man who to excuse or justifie his Crimes endeavour'd to blot out the Laws or to preach Impiety for good and wholsome Doctrine Tho' it be every Man's nature whether King or Subject when he hath done any thing that is evil to palliate the fact with such Circumstances as may make it appear as little as is possible dishonest or unjust We therefore conclude that the Universal Divine Law which the Scripture teacheth is deliver'd and derived to us pure and incorruptible There are other things also which have been faithfully deliver'd to us namely the general Collection of Scripture Histories because they are universally known The common people of the Iews were wont to sing the Antiquities and Ancient Facts of their Nation in Psalms or Songs The principal things done by Christ and his Passion were quickly publish'd through the whole Roman Empire and therefore 't is impossible to believe unless the greatest part of mankind should agree in that which is incredible that the principal things in Scripture Histories should be deliver'd to posterity otherwise than they were first receiv'd Whatever then is adulterated or faulty must happen only in this or that Circumstance of a Prophesie or History the more to move people to Devotion or in some Miracle to puzzle and nonplus Philosophers or lastly in matters Speculative after they were brought into Religion by Schismaticks abusing Divine Authority to support their own inventions But whether these things be or be not adulterated and corrupted doth not at all concern Salvation which I will expresly shew in the following Chapter tho' I think enough hath been already said to prove it in this and the second Chapter CHAP. XIII Shews that the Scripture teacheth nothing but what is very plain intending nothing but Mens Obedience neither doth it teach or declare any other thing of the Divine Nature than what a Man may in a right course of life in some degree imitate WE have already declared in the second Chapter of this Treatise that the Prophets did not so much excel in perfection of Mind and Understanding as in a singular faculty and power of Imagination That God revealed to them no deep points of Philosophy but only things very plain and easie condesending and applying himself to their Capacities and preconceiv'd Opinions We have in the fifth Chapter shewn that the Scripture delivers and teacheth things in such a manner as may render them most easie to be understood by every Man and that it doth not prove deduce and link things together by maxims and definitions but only plainly relates and declares things and to make Men believe confirms what it says by Experience that is by Miracles and Histories making use of such a Stile and such Expressions as are most likely to move and prevail upon the Minds of the common people of which I have spoken in proving the third Particular of the sixth Chapter Lastly I have shew'd in the seventh Chapter that the difficulty of understanding the Scripture lies only in the Language wherein it was originally written and not in the sublimity and abstruceness of the Subject whereof it treats and moreover that the Prophets did not preach only to the Learned but in general to all the Iews and that the Apostles preached the Doctrine of the Gospel in Churches where there was a common and universal Assembly of all people by all which it evidently appears that Scripture Doctrine contains no high Speculations nor Philosophical Arguments but only things plain and intelligible by the meanest and dullest Capacities I strangely admire the accuteness of those Men who discover in the Scripture Mysteries so profound that 't is impossible for the Tongue of Man to unfold them and who have
Society is called Democracy which is a general Assembly of men who in fellowship have Soveraign right to all things within their Power from whence it follows that Supream Power is bound by no Law but all ought to obey it in all things which obedience every one did in express words or tacitly and by implication promise when he transfer'd all his own Power of defending himself that is all his own natural right upon the Society So that if any men intended to keep any thing to themselves at the same time they ought to have provided and taken care for the defence and safe keeping thereof but if they did not nor could do it without dividing and consequently destroying the Government and Commonwealth that ought to be accounted an absolute submission of themselves to the will of the Supream Power which being done absolutely and not only upon necessity but likewise for very good reasons unless we will declare our selves Enemies to the Commonwealth and act contrary to Reason which perswades us to defend the Commonwealth with our utmost power we are bound to obey all the Commands of the Supream Power be they never so absurd for even those Reason commands us to obey that of two evils we may chuse the least Consider likewise how easily every one may run into the danger of submitting himself absolutely to the Will and Arbitrary Power of another for as we have shewn Supream Powers have no longer right of commanding what they will than they can keep that Power for as soon as they lose it they lose likewise the right of commanding all things and that right falls to him or them that can get and keep it therefore it very rarely happens that Supream Powers command harsh and unreasonable things for it very much concerns them to look to themselves to keep their Power to mind the publick good and order all things by the Rules of Reason No violent Governments saith Seneca ever stood long It is observable that in Democratical Governments severe and unreasonable Commands are never much to be feared for 't is almost impossible that the major part of an Assembly if it be great should agree in that which is unreasonable and absurd the Foundation and End likewise of that Government being only to avoid the mischiefs of boundless Appetite and to keep Men as much as may be within the compass of Reason that they may live together in Peace and Amity which Foundation once taken away down falls the whole Fabrick against which Ruin to provide is the duty of the Supream Power The Subjects part is to obey and acknowledge nothing else to be right but what is declared to be so by the Supream Power But some may think that by this Rule I make Subjects Servants or Slaves because they account him a Servant who acts by Command and him free who only obeys his own Will which is not absolutely true for he that gives himself up to his own pleasure and desires and neither sees or does what is for his own good is indeed the greatest of Slaves and he only is free who of his own accord lives according to the dictates of Reason Acting by Command which is Obedience doth in some sort take away Liberty but 't is the account upon which a Man acts that makes him a Servant for if the end of the action be wholly and solely for the benefit of him that commands without any advantage to the Agent then the Agent is a Servant and unprofitable to himself but in a Commonwealth or Government where the welfare of all the People and not of him that governs is the principal and Supreme Law he that in all things obeys the Supreme Power is not an unprofitable Servant to himself but is to be counted a Subject and therefore that Commonwealth is counted freest where the Laws are sounded upon most Reason for there every Man when he will may be free in living with his own intire consent according to the Rules of Reason Tho' Children are bound to obey all the Command of their Parents yet they are not Servants for the Commands of Parents tend chiefly to the good of their Children and therefore we acknowledge there is great difference between a Servant a Son and a Subject who are thus defined A Servant is he who is bound to obey the Commands of his Master which respect only the Masters benefit A Son is he that by his Parents Command doth that which is for his own good And a Subject is he who by the Command of the Supreme Power doth that which is for the good of the Publick and consequently as he is one of that Body for his own benefit By what I have said I think I have clearly shewn what is the Foundation of Democratical Government of which before all others I chuse to treat because it seems most natural and comes nearest to that freedom and liberty which Nature allows every Man for in Democratical Government no Man so transfers his own Natural Right to another as for ever after to be excluded from consultation but only transfers it upon the major part of the Society of which he still makes one and upon this all remain as they were before in their natural estate equal Moreover I purposely treated of this Government because it best suited with my Intention which was to speak of the benefit of Liberty in a Commonwealth I will therefore have nothing to do with the Foundations of other Powers nor to know their Right is it necessary to know whence they had and often have their Original that is too manifest From what I have declared where ever the Supreme Power is whether in one person in few or in all 't is certain that they have the Soveraign right of commanding what they will and whoever either willingly or by compulsion transfers to another the Power of defending himself he hath clearly parted with his Natural Right and consequently must resolve to obey him that hath it in all things which he continues obliged to do as long as the King the Nobles or the People can preserve the Supreme Power which they received which was the first Foundation of transferring Natural Right of which I need say no more The Foundations and Right of Government being laid open it is easie to determine what is private civil Right what is Injury or Wrong what is Justice what Injustice in a Civil State. Lastly Who is a Confederate or Ally who is an Enemy and what is Treason By private civil Right no other thing can be understood but every Man 's keeping and preserving himself in the state wherein he is which Liberty is limited and determined by the Decrees and Dictates of the Supreme Power and defended by the sole Authority thereof for after every one hath transferr'd to another his right of living according to his own Will which only bounded his own power I mean his liberty of defending himself he is then obliged to live
by Revelation or whether God command it for it matters not how it was revealed so as it obtain the Force of a Law and become in the highest Degree obligatory to Men. If I then prove That Justice and Charity cannot become a Law or Command but by the Power and Command of the Supream Powers it will be easily granted seeing Supream Power is always in the hands of the Supream Magistrates that Religion becomes a binding Law only by their Decrees who have the Power of Government and that God hath no peculiar Kingdom over Men but by them who have the Supream Ruling Power That the outward Practice of Justice and Charity becomes an obligatory Law by the Command of the Supream governing Power appears by what I have said in the Fourteenth Chapter where I have declared That in the State of Nature Reason cannot pretend to any greater power than Natural Appetite may and that they who live according to the Laws and Dictates of Natural Appetite have as much Right to all things within their Power as they that live according to the Rules of Reason So that for this very Reason we cannot conceive there can be in the State of Nature any sin nor can we think God to be a Judge punishing sins but all things carried on in their course according to the Laws of Universal Nature to use Solomon's own Words all things come alike to all there is one event to the righteous and to the wicked to the clean and to the unclean no place being left for Justice and Charity But that the Dictates of Reason that is as I have shew'd in the Fourteenth Chapter the Divine Law written in our hearts might obtain the strength and force of a Law it was necessary that every man should part from his Natural Right and transfer it either upon all upon some or upon one and that then we first came to know what was Justice and what Injustice what Equity and what Iniquity Justice therefore and the Dictates of Right Reason with Love to our Neighbour becomes a Precept and obligatory Law by the Power and Decrees of Supream Magistrates and because as I have shew'd the Kingdom of God consists in the power that Justice Charity and true Religion have over us by becoming a Law to us therefore it follows that God hath no peculiar Kingdom over Men but by those who have the Supream Ruling Power Whether we consider Religion revealed to us by natural or prophetical Light the Demonstration is Universal seeing Religion is the same and equally revealed by God which way soever it be supposed to come to our knowledge and therefore that Religion prophetically revealed might obtain the force of a Law among the Iews it was necessary every man should first part with his natural Right and that all with one common consent should resolve to obey and submit to all things which should by God be prophetically revealed to them just as People do in Democratical Government where all with common consent resolve to live according to the Dictates of Reason and though the Iews did transfer their Power upon God yet they did it more in opinion than reality for the Supream Power really and absolutely remained still in them till they transferr'd it upon Moses who was thenceforward an absolute King and by him only God reigned over the Iews Moreover because Religion became a Law only by the Power of the Supream Government Moses could punish none before the Covenant was made because then no man had parted with his own Power and Right They broke the Sabbath before the Covenant was made and were not punished as appears Exod. chap. v. 27. but after the Covenant when every man had parted with his Natural Right he that broke the Sabbath only by gathering sticks was stoned as appears Numb chap. 15. v. 36. and the observation of the Sabbath when the People had parted with their Power became a Law by the Command of the Supream Magistrate Lastly Upon this very ground also when the Commonwealth and Government of the Iews was destroyed Revealed Religion had no longer the Force of a Law for without doubt as soon as the Iews transferr'd their Power upon the King of Babylon the Covenant of the Kingdom of God and the Obligation of the Divine Law ceased for as soon as they were Subjects to the King of Babylon the Covenant whereby they promised to obey God in all things became void and they could no longer perform it From the time they were subjected to the King of Babylon they were no longer in their own power as they were in the Desart and their own Country but were in all things obliged to obey the King of Babylon as appears by what we have said in the Sixteen Chapter and by what Ieremy saith Chap. 29. v. 7. Seek ye the peace of that City whither I have caused ye to be earried captives and pray unto the Lord for it for in the peace thereof shall ye have peace They could not seek or provide for the peace of that City as Ministers of Government because they were Captives and therefore they were to do it as Servants or Subjects by keeping themselves free from Sedition and by observing the Laws of the Government though very different from those of their own Country By which it is evident that Religion among the Iews obtain'd the force of a Law by the Command of the Supream Power which Power being destroyed Religion was no more a Law or Command of that particular Government but was to be accounted a general Dictate of Reason I say of Reason because Catholick Religion was not yet known by Revelation we therefore conclude that Religion whether it be natural or revealed acquires the Force of a Command only by the Decree of those who have the Supream Power and God hath no peculiar Kingdom over Men but by the Supream Magistrate And this is made more clear by what hath been said in the Fourteenth Chapter where we have shewn That all God's Decrees imply Eternal Verity and Necessity nor can we conceive God as a Prince or Lawgiver to Men therefore Divine Documents made known to us by the light of Nature or revealed to us by the Prophets have not the force of a Law immediately from God but must necessarily receive it from those or by their means who have the Power of commanding and making Laws and by their means only we apprehend that God reigns over Men and directs Humane Affairs according to Justice and Equity which is also proved by Experience for we can find no Footsteps of Divine Justice but where the just reign otherwise to use Solomon's Expression once more the like event is to the righteous and to the wicked to the clean and to the unclean which made many doubt God's Providence who believed that God did immediately reign over Men and made Universal Nature only for their use Seeing then both Reason and Experience make it evident that the
common The Psalms speak of the Cedars of God to express their extraordinary height in the First Book of Sam. Chap. 10. v. 7. it is said The fear of the Lord fell on the People which signifies a very great fear and in this sense all things which exceeded the Capacity of the Iews and whose natural Causes where not known to them were always referr'd and attributed to God. Tempests were called Gods Chiding and Threatnings Thunder and Lightning his Darts and Arrows they thought God kept the Winds shut up in the Caverns of the Earth which they called his Treasuries in which Opinion they differ'd from the Heathen only by believing God and not AEolus to be their Ruler upon this ground Miracles are also called the Works of God that is stupendious wonderful works tho' indeed all things in Nature are the Works of God and only by Divine Power act and subsist in the same Sence the Psalmist calls the Miracles done in Egypt the Powers of God because in the Iews greatest danger they open'd a way to their safety and deliverance when they least expected it and were therefore so much admir'd by them Seeing then the Works of Nature which are strange and unusual are called the Works of God and Trees of extraordinary height and magnitude the Trees of God it is no wonder that in Genesis Men very Valiant and of great Stature tho' impious Robbers and Fornicators were called the Sons of God the Ancient Heathen as well as the Iews used to attribute to God every thing in which any one excell'd other Men Pharaoh when he heard the Interpretation of his Dream said that the Spirit of the Gods was in Ioseph and Nebuchadnezzar said the Spirit of the Holy Gods was in Daniel nothing was more frequent among the Latines then to say things very curiously wrought were done by a Divine Hand which Expression if a Man would turn into Hebrew he must say done by the Hand of God. By these places I have quoted many other in Scripture where mention is made of the Spirit of God may be easily understood and explained the Spirit of God and the Spirit of Iehovah in some places signifie nothing but a vehement dry and destroying Wind as Isa. Chap. 40. v. 7. The Grass withereth the Flower fadeth because the Spirit of the Lord bloweth upon it Also Gen. Chap. 1st v. 2. and the Spirit of God that is a strong Wind moved upon the Waters It also signifies a great Mind or Courage the Courage of Gideon and Sampson are stiled in Scripture the Spirit of God that is a bold daring Mind ready to undertake and attempt any thing So also any particular vertue or skill more then ordinary is in Scripture called the Spirit of God Exod. Chap. 31. v. 3. And I have filled him with the Spirit of God in Wisdom and Workmanship speaking of Bezaleel so Isa. Chap. 11. v. 2. And the Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him that is as the Prophet more fully explains himself the Vertue of Wisdom Councel and Might in like manner Sauls Melancholy is called an Evil Spirit of God or from God that is deep Melancholy for Sauls Servants who called his Melancholy the Melancholy of God were they that sent for Musick to recreate him which shew'd that they did not think his Melancholy to be any more than Natural sometimes by the Spirit of God is signified the Life of Man Iob Chap. 27. v. 3. The Spirit of God is in my Nostrils alluding to what is said Gen. Chap. 2. v. 7. God breathed into Mans Nostrils the Breath of Life so Ezek. Chap. 37. v. 14. saith Prophesying to the Dead and I will put my Spirit in you and ye shall live that is I will restore Life to you in the same Sense speaks Iob Ch. 34. v. 14. If he gather unto himself his Spirit and his Breath so likewise is to be understood the 3 Verse of the 6 th Chap. of Gen. My Spirit also shall not always strive with Manfor that he also is flesh that is Man hereafter shall do according to the dictates of his Flesh and not of his Mind which I gave him to discern Good from Evil Psal. 51. v. 10 11. David says Create in me a clean Heart O God and renew a right Spirit within me cast me not away out of thy presence and take not thy Holy Spirit from me because it was believed that Sins came only from the Flesh and that the Soul or Mind did incline Men only to good therefore the Psalmist implores Gods Assistance against his carnal Affections and prays that his Mind or Soul which God gave him may be preserved and kept by God now because the Scripture describes God like a Man and because the Common Peoples Capacity is weak doth attribute to God a Mind affections of Mind and likewise a Body and Breath therefore the Spirit of God is many times in Scripture taken for the Will the Mind the Power and the Breath of Gods Mouth Isa. Chap. 40. v. 13. the Prophet saith who hath directed the Spirit of the Lord that is who hath disposed the mind of God to will any thing which he himself hath not determin'd Likewise Chap. 63. v. 10. They rebelled and vexed his Holy Spirit Hence it is that sometimes 't is taken for the Law of Moses because it doth as it were explain and unfold Gods Mind for Isa. in the 11 th V. of the 63. Ch. saith where is he that put his Holy Spirit within him that is the Law as is clearly Collected from the Context Nehemiah Ch. 9. v. 20. saith thou gavest also thy good Spirit to instruct them speaking of the time of the Law Deut. Ch. 4. v. 6. Moses speaking of the Law saith This is your wisdom and understanding so David Psal. 43. v. 11. saith Thy good Spirit leadeth me into the Land of Vprightness that is thy mind revealed to us leadeth us into the right way the Spirit of God also signifies the Breath of God which is as improperly attributed to God as is Body or Mind Psal. 33. v. 6. And all the Host of them by the breath of his Mouth it signifies the power and might of God Iob Chap. 33. v. 4. The Spirit of God hath made me that is the Power of God or rather his decree for the Psalmist speaking poetically saith by the Word of the Lord were the Heavens made and all the Host of them by the Breath of his Mouth Also Psal. 139. v. 7. It is said whether shall I go from thy Spirit where Spirit signifies Gods Power and presence Lastly the Spirit of God is used in Scripture to express the affections of Gods Mind namely his Benignity Mercy c. Michah Chap. 2. v. 7. Is the Spirit of the Lord straightned are these his doings so Zachary Chap. 4. v. 6. not by might not by power but by my Spirit that is only by my Mercy and in this Sense I think ought to be understood