prinat spirit is condemned for example in the old law Numb 12. God was angry with Mary Moyses Sister and Aaron because they had detracted from Moyses she saying hath our lord spoken only by Moyses hath be not spoken also by vs and Ierem. 23. Heare not the words * S. Hieron ait falsos illos prophetas referre baereticos qui sequuntur spirituÌ„ suuÌ„ quia nequaquam inquit diuino instinctu sed proprio corde vaticinantur of the Prophets that prophesie vnto you and deceiue you they speak the visions of their own hearts and not out of the mouth of our lord and Ezech. 13. God saith thus woe vnto the foolish prophets that follow their own spirit yet say the lord saith it albeit I haue not spoken likewise in the new law this priuat spirit is condemned for in the primary age of the Church (f) Eusebius l. 3. hist Eccles cap. 12. attests that Cherintus besides his other prophane nouelties fained subtil delusions as reuealed vnto him by the ministery of Angels and according to the same Eusebius l. 5. cap. 15. Montanus and Maximilla were carried away with delusions of the like nature for among the reasons why they were cut of from the Church of God one was because they pretended vnto speciall reuelations and the Church declared that it was a thing contrary to the custom and practice down from the Apostles till those times that any particular person should presume to haue a priuat spirit reuealing vnto him matters pertaning to christian faith Cherintus was counted an Heretick for pretending vnto priuat reuelations in the spreading of sundry absurd doctrines and in as much as he asserted that Iesus-Christ was not come in the flesh Saint Ioan. Apostle Epis 1. cap. 4. writeth to the faithfull against him thus Dearly beloued belieue not euery spirit but trie the spirits whether they are of God for many false prophets are gon out into this world hereby you shall know the spirit of God euery spirit which confesseth that Iesus-Christ is come in the flesh is of God and euery spirit that confesseth not that Iesus-Christ is come in the flesh is not of God Yet althought the Apostle vsed that analogie in order to this true article of faith Iesus-Christ is come in the flesh as a certain signe to shew the falshood of Cherintus assertion neuertheless he did not mean to establish it for a generall rule to distinguish euery good from euery ill spirit or euery true from euery false doctrine for the Pelagians and sundry ancient sectaries are counted Hereticks both by Lutherans and Caluinists albeit they acknowleged the mistery of the Incarnation But the generall rule for the trying of spirits Saint Iohn clearly expresseth a very little after in his same Epistle saying Wee Apostles are of God he that knoweth God heareth vs he that is not of god heareth vs not hereby know we the spirit of truth and the spirit of errour In regard his first particular rule was not sufficient enough to discerne between euery true and false doctrine that is to say between all true and false Teachers therfore he addeth this generall rule viz. To heare or not to heare vs Apostles Gouernours of the Church alluding to Christs own words set down I uc 10. He that heareth you heareth me and he that despiseth you despiseth me Saint Iohn spoke in the person of all the Apostles and their successors in Church Gouerment with whom is deposited christian doctrine receiued from the mouth of Christ and truly it is very probable that no one of the other Apostles was aliue when Saint Iohn writ his Epistle yet what Christ promised Mat. 28. behold I am with you alwayes untill the end of the world remained then in him and euen now in the Prelats of the Church that succeed the Apostles in the administration therof wherby it is cleare that the office of supream Iudge of coÌ„trouersies in debate concerning faith and religion is proper to ecclesiasticall authoritie only howeuer in as much as no man can come vnto Christ except the Father which hath sent him draw him Ioa. 6. inward grace of the holy Ghost is necessarily required to belieue in and loue God aright vnto the obseruation of his ordinances and law of which is meant the prophesies Ierem. 31. I will put my law saith our lord in their inward parts and write it in their hearts and will be their God and they shall be my people Isa 50. and all thy children shall be taught of our lord to witt by inward grace which excludeth not outward Teachers for faith is by heareing and hearing importeth outward Teachers Moyses and the Prophets of those daies taught the people in as much as they declared vnto them outwardly the lawes of God affording nothing of inward help to the seeking of them but Christ truly God cloathed with human flesh taught by himselfe in our new law both outwardly preaching the doctrine of faith and inwardly instilling into the hearts of his people inward grace for the embracing of it and afterward before his ascention into heauen appointed outward visible Teachers and promised withall his own inward inuisible concurrence with them to the end of the world Wherfore doubtless the alledged scripturs will show only the maiority of Christ compared to Moyses and the Prophets in order to teaching matters of faith and religion together (g) According to holy scripture Io. 1. the law was giuen by Moyses but grace and truth came by Iesus-Christ The old law pointed at sin onely and made it known but the new law furnishes grace to fulfill it and purge out of our souls the leauen of sin with the plenteous measure of grace especially annexed to the new law in respect wherof it is stiled the law of grace neither is this necessity of outward Teachers excluded by the saying of Saint Paul 1. Cor. 2. he that is spirituall discerneth all things and he himselfe is iudged of noe man Ioa. 1. Eps cap. 2. ye need not that any man teach you but as his vnction teacheth you all things and it is true and is notlying and Saint Ioa. 1. Eps cap. 5. he that belieueth in the son of God hath the testimony of God in himselfe for as to the first text Saint Paul spoke of the spirituall man only that is to say of such beliuers as were perfect and knowing of christian doctrine and therby apt to discern false opinions and conceiue the high mysteries of faith declared by word of mouth or writing which is not to exclude outward Teachers and that this is the true meaning appeareth by the Apostle himselfe because he says in the very same Chapter set down We speak wisdom among them that are perfect and we speake wisdom in a mystery wherby he seâ—teth the spirituall maÌ„ against the naturall man that is versed only in the wisdom of the world or in the knowledge of naturall things and in the third Chapter of the same Epistle
the Council of Trent sess 6. can 3. The particle coueted is inserted in this character or definition because vsury does not consiste onely in opere in the receiuing of vnlawfull interest or in ore in the exacting thereof but also in corde in the desire and coueting of it whence comes the distinction of real and mentall vsury for S. Austin defines sin Factum vel dictum vel concupitum contra legem Dei that is sin is a transgression of the law of God either in deed word or thought By the particle precisely is meant that in the lucre or gain which comes of lending is the consistency of vsury for a man that has a sum of money design'd and ready at hand for traffick in a certain or probable way of encreasing his riches lawfully and notwithstanding all this of his good will which is charity lendes the same sum to a neighbour that is pressed with necessity he does not commit vsury in coueting exacting or receiuing interest aboue the Capitall because lucre inuested with that circumstance comes not precisely of lending it being rather a recompense vpon an other scoare called by diuines lucrum cessans lucre ceasing which may be lawfully exacted or sould without incurring vsury Neither matters it that the gain exspected from money that is actually ready and deputed to trafficke is vncertaine because of the many casualities whereby it may be obstructed for a fisher man does not commit the sin of vsury that selles a cast or draught with his net though nothing of benefit arise thereby to the buyer and indeed the profit is vncertaine according to the Apostles answere to Christ Luc. 5. Domine per totam noctem laborantes nihil caepimus Master wee haue trauailed all night launcing into the deep and letting down our nets to make a draught and haue taken nothing Again t is not vsury to receiue exact or couet vantage aboue the capitall in regard of prejudice precisely suffer'd by the loan thereof and this Diuines call damnum emergens dammage that comes of loan precisely and truly no man is bound to pleasure his neighbour to the prejudice of himselfe in consequence of which a man for example that lends a sum of money out of good will and thereby receiues dammage may lawfully receiue moderate interest vnto compensing his loss for this is not to encrease his riches in vertue of the loane precisely but to repaire the dammage suffered thereby which is the doctrine of S. Thomas q. 78. ar 2. ad 2. And the common assertion of Catholick Doctours Besides Pope Leo the tenth in consideration of damnum emergens hath defin'd in the Council of Laterain that the publick banks named montes pietatis mounts-piety containe nothing of eueil and that they may iustly exact and receiue something of moderate encrease aboue the capitall in respect of the expences where vnto they are liable which in earnest are great for they require a spatious house together with conuenient rooms for the receiuing of pledges likewise they entertaine many seruants in order to sundry offices namely to receiue price distinguish and conserue the pledges to call in pay out moneys and to take keepe and giue accompts of affairs whereby is plainely euidenced that the mounts-picty are subject to great expences in reguard whereof they may lawfully exact and receiue something of moderate interest aboue the capitall for Aequum est vt nulli sua pietas noceat moreouer t' is a rule in law qui sentit commodum debet etiam sentire onus The particles moderat interest is added because those are guilty of vsury which in taking of interest vpon the scoar of damnum emergens or lucrum cessans doe not what is lawfull and right do not shew mercy vnto the poore do not restore the pledges to their debtours but contrary wise oppress and tye them to hard conditions and bargans and exact immoderate interest vnder specious pretences of damnum emergens or lucrum cessans which is a meer colour of seeming equity that serues as a cloake to palliate that is to couer or hide vsury and palliated vsury is no less detestable and execrable in the sight of God then if it were outwardly apparent for all manner of vsury taken in the proper sense is vnlawfull bearing the guilt of deadly sin 10. the old law forbid's it ps 14. Lord who shall dwell in thy Tabernacle who shall rest in thy holy mountaine .... he that has not giuen his money vnto vsury from this sacred text the Council of Nyce infers a diuine precept condemning vsury again t is forbidden Exod. 22. If thou lend money to my people saith God by the mouth of his Prophet that is to the poore with thee .... thou shalt not oppress him with vsury neuertheless the ancient Iews Deut. 23. had a priuiledge by diuine dispensation to lend vpon vsury vnto a stranger that is to an enimy whereby were meant the Cananites and Amorits whom God commanded the Israëlites to destroy lest they should be a meane of their ruine and according to S. Ambrose l. de Tob. c. 15. Vbi ius belli ibi ius vsurae in consequence of which since the Israëlites might kill the Cananites and Amorites without sinning they might lawfully spoile them of their riches and since God de facto as Dominus vniuersorum supream lord of all granted the same Israëlites leaue to depriue the Egyptians of their gold and siluer vessels it ought not to seem a strang thing if he tolerated * S. Tho. q. 78. ar 1. ad 2. q. 13. de malo ar 4. ad primū cui subscribunt Caietanus Soto ait Judaeis non suisse concessum exigere vel recipere vsuras ab alienigenis tanqnā ailiqnd in se licitum sed permissum seu toleratum quo pacto tolerabatur inter illos libellus repudij causa maioris mali euitandi the loan of money vpon vsury 20. t is forbidden in the new law Luc. 6. Date mutuum nihil inde sperantes lend hoping nothing thereby The latter particle of this sacred Text namely hoping nothing thereby implies an absolute precept though the particle lend that goes before importes counsell onely and the sense and meaning is lend but in vertue thereof take exacte or couet nothing of encrease aboue the capitall that is of interest that carries the price and valeu of money 30. Vsury includes an intrinsicall malice in consequence of which t is forbidden by the law of nature and indeed t is against the dictates of naturall reason to exacte lucre of a thing that is not ones owne neither as to the dominion nor vsage thereof but he that lend's for example money wine oyle which through vsing consume away * Cōtractus transferentes dominiū sunt emptio venditio donatio mutuum per quod gratis creduntur res quae in numero mēsura vel pōdere consistunt vsia consumuntur transfers the dominion and the vse therof from himselfe
that went afore to wit with an oath by him that said vnto him Our lord hath sworne and will not repent thou art a Priest for euer according to the Order of Melchisedech 2. Outward oblation is obseruable which is expressed in the words wherby Christ consecrated his body and blood saying This is my body which is giuen for you (k) The Apostle S. Paul vseth the verbe giue in that signification when he mentioneth our redemption procured by the sacrifice of the Cross for exaÌ„ple Gal. 3. ad Tit. 2. likewise holy scripture vseth frequently the verb to shed for to Sacrifice Exod. 29. Leuit. 1.2.3 This is my blood of the new Testament which is shed for you which are the terms of proper sacrifice and were outwardly vttered in the last supper For indeed all the actions performed by Christ in celebrating the Eucharist were outward actions namly blessing of the bread giuing thanks to his diuine Father before consecration and * Christus in vltima coena manducauit corpus suum bibit sanguineÌ„ suum vna cuÌ„ Apostolis vt post s. Hiero alios Patres docet S. Thomas 3. p. q. 81. eating his own hody and drinking his own blood together with his Apostles after consecration 3. Oblation of a sensible permanent thing is obseruable vêªt videlicet Christ's body and blood which are sensible things vnder the form's of bread and wine which are sensible also 4. There is obseruable destruction or reall change in the oblation to wit by substantiall conuersion of the bread into Christ's body and wine into his blood Besides by eating and drinking therof the body and blood of Christ lose that sacramentall being they had by reproduction vnder the elements of bread and wine which is a reall change also 5. It was an oblation exhibited to God alone for Christ in celebrating the Eucharist addressed all his speeches to his diuine Father lastly there is obseruable recognition of diuine omnipotency as is plainly euidenced by the oblation it self since it succeeded not only in the room of the Pascall lamb but of all the other sacrifices of the law of Moyses and consequently ought to containe in it self the perfect morall signification essentiall to those sacrifices which is recognition of diuine omnipotency and representation of the sacrifice of the cross Nor is it inconuenient for a sacrifice going afore to be a representation or commemoration of a sacrifice comming after for all the old sacrifices went before the sacrifice of the crosse which neuertheless they represented How euer the sacrifice of the cross is only distinct from the sacrifice of the Fucharist as to the manner of offering bloodily or vnbloodily for the head-offerer is the same Christ and the thing offered the same also body and blood of Christ And albeit that Christ by one sole bloody oblation that is by once offering himself in a bloody manner consummated the generall redemption neuertheless he did not think fit to make that one generall oblation an effectuall redemption or remission of sins without the application therof for so he had entailed the kingdom of Heauen vpon euery sinner and consequently deuested himself of all power to disinherit any for what fault soeuer But the applicatiue perfection as to a sacrifice he gaue to the vnbloody oblation only which by his own institution and appointment is and shall be the externall seruice of the new Testament and the continuall application of his passion vnto sanctification As corporall remedies how perfect and sufficient soeuer doe no cure vpon a sick body that is to say are not effectuall remedies vnless they be applyed so Christ his death and passion though a spirituall remedy superabundantly sufficient to take away all the sins of the world neuertheless is not an effectuall remission of any till it be applied aright neither is the preeminent perfection of Christs death and passion a iot lessened therby application being necessarily requisit to its effect by Christ his own appointmeÌ„t And praiers which the faithfull offer to God one for an other doe not prejudice or diminish any part of the intercession which Christ himself made for his people while he liued vpon earth Io. 17. nor of those which sitting at the right hand of his diuine Father he presenteth continually Rom. 8. Heb. 7. But rather do apply the fruit therof to the effecting of the said faithfull their holy desires especially when prayers are offered by the Bishopps and Priests of the catholick Church vnto whom God hath committed the (l) God saith the Apostle 2. Cor. 5. Hath giuen vnto us the vvord of reconciliation novv then are vve Ambassadours for Christ God as it vvere exhorting by us Wherby is meant that Christ as man is the principall Minister vnto reconciling of sinners to God and for and in the room of Christ in order to the office of reconcilement the Apostles and their successors were instituted as his Vicars namely the Bishops and Priests of the Catholick Church Wherfore their absolution from sinnes by offering sacrifice and their ministring the Sacraments ought to be counted as Christs own absolution remission or pardon being the absoluing from and remitting sinnes in the room of Christ in like manner their preaching and exhorting in stead of Christ is as if it were Christ's own preaching and exhorting the office of Bishops and Priests being the Vicarship of Christ So that when the same Apostle saith Hebrae 8. that Christ onely is the Priest of the new law or Testament his meaning is that Christ is the chief Priest that is the Prince of Priests to whom as to his Ambassadours he hath committed the ministery of reconciliation In the old law according to the Apostle Hebrae 7. there was a series of many chief Priests succeeding one an other in that function for none of all them was of perpetuall durance But in our new law there is but one chief Priest or Bishop that shall endure for euer and all other Priests are his Vicars onely who in his room exercise Priestly function visibly wherfore Christ is chief Priest for euer and exerciseth his Priesthood by his substitute Ministers or Vicars which execute the office of reconciliation for him and in his room ministery of reconciliation for and vnder Christ who is the high Priest and chief Minister according to his humanity of mans reconcilement to God the others exercise Christs vicarshipp only These pray and minister sacrifice and Sacraments in Christs stead both vnto remission of sins and the verifying his For euer Priesthood according to the order of Melchisedech so that Christ is a Priest for euer after the right order and similitude of Melchisedech for as much as he dayly doth and shall to the end of the world offer by the Priests of the new law as his Vicars the vnbloody sacrifice of his own body and blood vnder the form's of bread and wine called by vse which is the arbitratour of words and language sacrifice of the
preparation holy according to the interpretation of the ancient Fathers Furthermore though the faithfull of the new law do succeed in the Couenant established between Abraham and God Rom 9. The words whereof are these I will be God vnto thee and to thy seed after thee Gen. 17. neuertheless there cannot be alleadged any one Scripture-testimony to proue that the children of belieuing Parents be sanctified in vertue of the said Couenant for they are not Abrahams seed and heires in their Mothers wombe or as soon as they be born according to promise but after they be made sons of God by faith * Gal. 3. quicunque enim in Christo baptiz ati estis Christum induist is si autem vos Christi ergo semen Abrahae estis haeredes secuÌ„dum promissionem in Christ Iesus through baptism Gal. 3. Moreouer the Couenant was made on condition that euery man child should haue the foreskin of his flesh circumcised or otherwise cut of from the people of God Gen. 17. in consequence of which it is euident that euen in the old law the Male-sex descending from Abraham by corporall generation were not counted de facto indeed children of the Couenant without circumcision in like manner in the new law no man is Abrahams seed childe of the Couenant and Heir of blessednes according to promise that is not Christs afore by spirituall generation in baptism which is christian circumcision and the condition of promised blessednes Wherefore it is a weake imagination of modern sectaries to think that faithfull and holy Parents bring forth sanctified children Besides Isaac and Rebecca were most renouned for faith and holiness neuertheless not euen Caluinists will dare to say that their son Esau was sanctified in his mothers wombe Sithence the Sacrament of baptism is a requisite absolutly necessary vnto saluation according to the common and ordinary way instituted for the obtaining of it a christian woman conceiuing a child shall doe most prudently and christianly during the tyme of trauail to desire of God by dayly prayers and alms-deeds that the fruit of her womb may not be depriued of baptism and God whose power is not confined to Sacraments and whose mercy is aboue his other ordinary workes can be moued at the piety and deuotion of a belieuing Mother to vse a speciall priuiledge to bring the said child to the kingdom of Heauen though naturall causes doe obstruct the baptism therof howeuer Infants of what condition soeuer dying in their infancy vnbaptized with the guilt only of originall treason against the diuine majesty committed by their first Parent are but banisht the court of Heauen no sentence of sensible punishment passeth against them being their consent as to their own (f) According to S. Bernard cited by S. Tho. q. de malo ar 2. a man burnes in the fire of hell in regard of his own will onely But Originall sin is noe product of our own will will was not giuen to the treason so that their banishment is most milde and fauourable compared with the (g) According to S. Gregory Nazian Ora. 40. young babes which through misfortune are not baptis'd neither enjoy the glory of Heauen nor endure the pains of Hell which S. Austin l. de pec mer. remis c. 16. calleth mitissimam damnationem the mildest damnation and that no man may conceiue that S. Austin so nameth the condition of children that dye without Baptism as if he so named it in comparison of the torments those suffer which are punish'd with euerlasting sensible burnings in regard of their actuall personall sinnes â— 5. con Julia. cap. 8. affirmes expresly that his meaning is that children dying vnbaptised are not afflicted with so grieuous pains as that it were better they had neuer been born but Christ saith of the damned in Hell melius esset si natus non fuisset homo ille wherfore according to Christs own saying it were better neuer to be born then to dwell in Hell and hereby appear's that poena sensus sensible pain is not procured by originall sin and indeed the punishment a man incur's through originall sin is a priuation of beatificall vision onely according to S. Thomas in 2. dis 33. q. 12. ar 2. wherefore wheras S. Austin ser 14. de verbis Apostoli saith that children vnbaptis'd are on the left hand and goe into euerlasting fire doubtles he mean's not that they shall be tormented with the euerlasting burnings of Hell Besides perhaps S. Austin aggrauated the punishment of children vnbaptis'd in heat of dispute with the Pelagians that ascribed vnto them eternall felicity without the kingdom of Heauen Howeuer S. Austin in Enchir. ad Laur. cap. 47. ingeniously confesseth that he neither can nor dare define Qua qualis quanta set poena illa parvulorum sine baptismo morientium and names it onely mitâ—ssimam aut leuissimam poenam And doubtless though children that dye without baptism in as much as they be depriu'd of the clear sight of God suffer something of heauiness neuertheless it is not grieuous vnto them being they know that they are not depriu'd of heauenly blessedness in regard of any personall fault of their's again fince that heauiness or sorrow is not Poena sensus a sensible punishment there can be no outward cause thereof banishment of ill Angells and wicked men that haue by their own voluntary act engaged in a rebellion against God their soueraign lord In regard of the absolute necessary dependence that eternall life hath of baptism Christ out of a fauourable prouidence towards all mankinde so instituted this Sacrament that euen (h) According to Tertull. l. de Baptis c. 16. Lay-people can minister baptism lawfully when the necessity thereof vrgeth and cannot otherwise be supplyed which opinion S. Hierom assertes Dial. 1. adversus Lucif and truly the Apostles Ioan. 4. ministred the baptism of Christ while they were lay-men for they were made Priests at the last supper moreouer this doctrine is asserted as an Article of faith by the Council of Florence in the Decree of Pope Engenius priuate persons of what condition or sex soeuer vnclothed with authority by ordination or iurisdiction can both lawfully and validly exercise the administration therof in the occurrence of vrgent necessity occasioned through the absence of Pastors lawfully called therunto applying the true matter and true forme and employing also an intention conformable to Christ and his Church and albeit that setting aside the case of necessity baptism so administred is vnlawfull as to conscience in him that is the Minister therof neuertheless it is valid as to the essence of the Sacrament circumcision performed by vncircumscised Gentills was counted valid and the same reason makes for the validity of Baptism exercised by vnbaptized persons seeing there is parity between baptisme and circumcision as vnto necessary application But to proceed further as to the excellency of this Sacrament of Christ for so it is named properly and therfore
whosoeuer eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternall life and except you shall eate the flesh of the son of man and drinke his blood you haue no life in you again the bread that I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world Thus saith S. Austin ser 2. de verbis Apos c. 1. life said of life and to him that thinketh life to be a lyer this meat shall be death and not life The bread that I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world c. Thereby signifying plainly his intent of leauing to his Church his substantiall reall body in meate and his substantiall reall blood in drinke as an effectuall expedient for the obtaining eternall life for alwaies the words of Christ or God which doe importe a thing promised tending to mans saluation ought to be vnderstood in the sense wherein they be outwardly expressed in scripture that is to say * Aug. l. de doc Chris cap. 10. 16. in sermone inquit diuino id omne pertinet ad sensum literalem id est debet accipi literaliter vt verba sonāt non figuratè quod potest referri ad morum honestatem vel fidei veritatem locutio quae iubet vel vtilitatē vel beneficentiā est propria non figuratiua secundum Iustinum codice de legibus litterally setting aside Tropes and mysticall significations Besides a law or precept that exact's obedience from subjects and such indeed is the legacy of the new Testament ought to be cleare and plain to the vnderstanding of euery man that each one may decline what is forbidden and obserue what is enjoyned For no law or precept can be vnderstood by all subjects if the words thereof be mysticall or figuratiue but Christ to shew that he spok according * Concil Nicae quod est 7. synodus generalis Act. 6. probat ex citato Textu Jo. 6. con Iconiclastas Sacramentum Eucharistiae non esse imaginem Christi sed verum reale corpus erus probat insuper ex eodem loco Trid. sess 21. can 1. laicos non adctrings iure diuine ad communionem sub vtraque specie to the plain litterall sense when he perceiued that the Capharnaits for in the synagogue at Capharnaum Christ taught these thinges began to reason among themselues concerning the possibility of giuing his flesh to eate and his blood to drinke he did not correct their conceptions as to orall manducation and orall drinking thereof yet his custome (c) In regard Nicodemus conceiu'd spirituall regeneration after the similitude of naturall generation Christ rectifyed his vnderstanding in regard the Pharisees Io. 16. Mat. 15. imagined that a meer omission of washing their hand 's before refection was a grieuous crime Christ instructed them in the knowledge of sin and in regard the Apostles made a wrong construction of his saying in order to eating his body anddrinking of his blood Christ forthwith expounded his meaning telling them that the words he had spoken were spirit and life that is according to S. Austin Epis 98. they were spiritually not carnally meant as if Christ had intended to giue vnto his Apostles particles of his body diuided from the whole so that Christ in order to the manner and that onely of eating his body and drinking of his blood corrected his Apostles was constant in conformity to his pastorall office to instruct his auditory conceiuing amiss of his sayings but repeated the same words confirmed with an oath saying to them Amen Amen except yee eat the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood yee haue no life in you which conuincingly shews that Christ spake not figuratiuely but litterally and indeed an oath is sworn to the end that such as doubt of the thinges promised or spoken may be assured of the true meaning of him that promiseth or speaketh any thing Hebrae 6. in consequence of which a thing confirmed with an oath ought to be interpreted in the * Innocentius 3. cap. veniens Extra de iuramento plain literall sense and according to the conceptions of those for whose sake an oath is sworn but the Capharnaits for whose sake Christ * Augus ait Christum iurasse dicēdo Amen Amen swore conceiued Christ to speake of orall manducation of his body and orall drinking of his blood wherefore it was that manner of eating and drinking that Christ confirmed with his oath but when he saw that his Disciples did misunderstand his meaning as to the eating his flesh and drinking his blood imagining him to mean that they were to eate his flesh and drink his blood with the mouth of their body after the manner of common meate and drink that is to teare Christs body and blood diuiding one part from an other in eating and drinking it he corrected (d) According to S. Cyprian ser de Coena Domini the intent and aime of Christs saying Ioan. 6. Vnlesse you eate c. was to instruct vs that our abiding in him is meate and drinke from whence Caluinists vnaduisedly infer that S. Cyprian interpreted Christs words Vnlesse you eate c. Of spiritualll manducation onely For in the place set down S. Cyprian expresly assertes that Christ cōmanded Christians in the new law to drink his blood the eating wherof in the old law Deut. 12. was prohibited which doubtless is meant of true reall drinking Wherefore S. Austin 9.57 in Leuit ingeniously confesseth that in the new law wee are as truly cōmanded to drinke the blood of Christ as were the Jews in the old law forbidden to drink the blood of sacrifices offered vnto expiating sins in consequence of which according to S. Cyprian and S. Austin reall drinking of Christs reall blood is commanded in the chapter alledged and instructed them as to the manner therof only saying The words that I spake vnto you are spirit and life that is sayes S. Aug. on the 98. Psal They ought not to be vnderstood carnally as if Christs intent had been to giue certaine particles or peices of his body diuided from the whole but they ought to be vnderstood spiritually which is to say that Christs body is in the Sacrament after the manner of a spirituall substance invisible indivisible whole and entire in the whole entire subject also whole and entire in each part thereof And here is observable that a reall substantiall and true body may be considered after two sundry fashions conformably to the Apostle that sayes 1. Cor. 15. A body is raised spirituall in incorruption that is sown naturall in corruption First as it is cloathed with terrene conditions and qualities which naturally accōpany a body in this mortall life For example visibility divisibility and mortality Secondly as it is deuested of such rayments of corporall accidents and inuested with the noble conditions and qualities of a spirit or spirituall substance namely invisibility indivisibility impassibility According to this latter consideration which is
proper to things spirituall Christ meant the orall eating of his flesh and orall drinking of his blood saying The words that I speak vnto you that is those things my flesh and blood are * Trid. sess 13. ait Christum instituisse SacrameÌ„tum Eucharistiae taÌ„quam spiritualem animaruÌ„ cibum spirit and life and that is to say are spiritually cloathed after the imitation of spirituall substances exempted from the carnall proprieties which naturally adhere to flesh and blood in this mortall life but are no essentiall requisits there vnto whereby it is plain that the eating of Christs body and drinking of his blood in the Sacrament of the Eucharist may be said spirituall in reference to the spirituall being they haue therein Besides Christs body and blood be indeed spirituall supersubstantiall meate and drink wherby the substance of humane souls is supported and nourished spiritually As corporall meate doth repaire materiall breaches which naturall heate mak's in a materiall body so this spirituall meate doth repaire the spirituall ruines that the fire of concupiscence doth cause in a spirituall soul Also the eating of Christs body and drinking of his blood may bee termed spirituall through faith for as much as a Christian that eateth and drinketh worthily is vnited to Christ by faith which is aspirituall quality Again the eating of Christs body and the drinking of his blood may be styled spirituall because of Christs death and passion figured therein and this Sacrament imports * QuotiescuÌ„quo ait Apostolus manducabitis panem hunc calicem bibetis mortem Domini annunciahitis donec veniat a commemoration thereof so that a Christian receiuing worthily doth communicate with Christs passion suffered on the cross and this manner of spirituall locution is vsed sometimes by ancient Fathers who neuertheless expresly affirm Christ to bee truly (e) The second Council of Nice Act. 6. declares euidently that the Sacrament of the Eucharist ought not to be called the Image of Christs body because he did not say take eate the Image of my body also declares that in the Sacrament is the true body of Christ because he said This is my body really and substantially in the Sacrament of the Eucharist neither is the literall sense of words inconsistent with the spirituall signification of thinges which they express taken in the literall sense For example though Isaac and Ismael doe literally signify the two sons of Abraham as the history of Genesis plainly sheweth neuertheless the Apostle Gal. 4. by Ismael that was born of Agar a seruant spiritually and figuratiuely vnderstands the old Testament that was a law of bondage and likewise by Isaac that was born of Sara a free woman spiritually and figuratiuely vnderstandeth the new Testament which is a law of liberty and grace and indeed all Sacraments whatsoeuer besides * Aug. l. 2. con aduers legis c. 9. ait Christi locutionem nisâ— manducaueritis c. codem modo esse figuratam ac duo filij Abraha fuâ—â—unt duo Test amenta Jsaac Ismael secuÌ„dum literam vere de facto fuerunt filij Abraha figurabant tamen duo Testamenta Idem Aug. l. 3. de doct Christ c. 16. ait illam Christi locutionem nisi manducaueritis c. figuratam esse quatenus praecipit communicandum passioni Christi vtiâ—â—ter recondendum in memoria quod pro nobis caro Christi crucifixa sit Non negat tamen dictam locutionem in sensu literali etïam intelligi de reali oralâ— manducatione corporit Christi bibition◠〈◊〉 sanguinis sub spocicbus consecratis panis vins their literall doe admit a spirituall or figuratiue construction being defined visible figures or signes of spirituall invisible grace The Sacrament of Circumcision according to the literall meaning thereof did signify corporall circumcision as to the foreskin of the flesh called prepuce and according to it 's spirituall and figuratiue signification did import spirituall circumcision as to the foreskin of the heart which is of spirituall vices as also did shadow grace giuen in the new law In like manner the words vttered in baptism I baptise thee taken in the literall sense which is expressed immediatly by the said words doe signify reall washing of naturall water as to the body and taken in the spirituall sense they signify spirituall washing of grace * Aug. vnde tanta vis aquae vt corpus tangat cor vero abluat as to the soul Furthermore the words whereby Christ instituted the Sacrament of the Eucharist in full performance of the promise afore mentioned Io. 6. giue cleare euidence of Christs meaning in recognition of a reall eating of his body and reall drinking of his blood The words of institution according to the consenting Testimonies of all ancient and modern writers are these This is my body which is giuen for you Luc. 22. This is my body which shall be deliuered for you This Chalice is the new Testament in my blood 1. Cor. 11. This is the blood of the new Testament which shall be shed for you Mar. 14. This is my blood of thenew Testament that shall be shed for many vnto remission of sins Mat. 26. Which words of Christ being as plainly and clearly vttered as to the litterall sense as those of God the Father in the Transfiguration of Christ to wit This is my son Mat. 30. and consequently there beeing no more reason to wrest the former then the latter words to a figuratiue signification it is a manifest blindnes in the Caluinists and other ancienter sectaries to wrest the proper cleare words and to substitute in their room improper obscure tropes and figures without any ground of reason for what can be more vnreasonable then to think that Christ saying This is my body which shall bee deliuered for you 1. Cor. 11. This is my blood which shall bee shed for many vnto remission of sins Mat. 26. meant a figure (f) Both canon and ciuil lawers treating of Testaments legasies and contracts teach that we must not recede from the words of the Testament nor from the rigour thereof and that we ought to presume of the Testatours intent and meaning according to the signification of the words taken in their proper sense of his body only and a figure of his blood only since a figure was not deliuered in a Sacrifice but Christ's true reall substantiall body nor a figure was shed vnto remission of sins but Christs true reall and substantiall blood Besides a thing that is mysterious vnheard of afore and instituted for an article of faith as is the Sacrament of the Eucharist of necessity ought to bee propounded (g) According to S. Chrysostome Hom. 83. in Mat. because Christ said This is my body we must not doubt of but belieue it to be so And S. Austin Tom. 8. in psal 33. saith expresly that when Christ gaue the Sacrament of the Eucharist he did that which no other could do for Christ saith
new law namely outward Rite or sign promise of sanctifying grace and the institution of Christ The outward Rite or ligh as to the Sacrament of Penance is the sensible absolution of a Priest The promise of grace appears by the words of Christ Ioan. 20. Whose sinnes you shall forgiue they are forgiuen them and the institution of Christ is expres'd in the precedent words of the same Chapter As my Father sent me so send I you Wherfore the ancient Fathers treating of sacramentall Penance in order to such as are baptized teach that Christ giues power vnto a Priest to remit thereby euen occult sinnes in consequence of which they appropriate to Penance the name of a Sacrament as much as to baptism Tertull. l. de praescript adversus Haeret Ambros l. de poenit c. 7. and S. Austin l. 5. hom c. 5. compareth this Sacrament ministred by a Priest to the raising yp of Lazarus by Christ and to the vntying of his cords by the Apostles Sacrament of the new law taken in the proper sense vnto remission of sius committed after baptism and therefore named * Hieron ad Demetr vocat Sacramentum poenitentia secundam tabulam post naufragium the second spirituall boord or plank of a souls spirituall wrack Grace giuen by baptism restoreth sanctity that Originall sin tooke away grace receiued through Penance recouereth that sanctity being lost again through actuall sin A christians life on earth is a warfare against flesh and blood against principalities against powers against worldly Gouernours the Princes of the darknesse of this world and against all spirituall wickednesses which are the assaults of the deuill And for as much as humane nature is infirm and the power of this aduersary great it is impossible for any whomsoeuer to escape vnwounded without armour of extraordinary protection In regard whereof Christ hath prouided a soueraigne remedy as an effectuall cure for all the personall wound a christian might receiue in this warfare exercised after baptism and this is the Sacrament of Penance instituted by Christ himselfe (b) Christ Mat. 18. saying to his Apostles Whatsoeuer ye shall binde on earth shall be bound in Heauen and vvhatsoeuer ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in Heauen only promised them and their successors in Priestly function authoritie and power to forgiue sinnes and inuested them in it Ioan. 20. saying vnto them Receiue the holy Ghosâ— vvhose sinnes you shall forgiue are forgiuen them Neither hath Christ left less power vnto Priest's to loose then to binde as S. Ambrose asserted against Nouatianus who taught that Priests had power to bind but not to loose 10.20 when he said to his Apostles Receiue the holy Ghost whosoeuers sius ye shall remit they are remitted and whosoeuers sins ye shall retain they are retained Although Christ alone had the * Apoc. 3. qui habet clauem Dauid c. key of Dauid which openeth and no man shutteth and shutteth and no man openeth Apocal. 30. as to supream excellency and power of remitting and retaining sins being enabled in vertue of his diuinity to open to and shut against sinners the kingdome of Heauen without help of a Sacrament neuertheless the same power as to participation and outward Ministery therof he communicated to his said Apostles and their successors in priestly function committing to them the Word of reconciliation 1. Cor. 5. That is to say the * Aug. accedit verbuÌ„ ad elementum fit Sacramentum ElemeÌ„tum seu materia proxima Sacramenti poenitentiae est confessio contritio word of sacramentall power implyed in the form of sacramentall absolution vêªt videlicet I absolue thee which ioyned to the elements contrition confession and actuall satisfaction makes the Sacrament of Penance these acts being the materiall parts therof And although Christ did not appoint this form in express tearmes neuertheless for as much as he instituted this Sacrament (c) Great is the dignity of a Priest saith S. Chrysostome hom 85. in Joan. For vvhose sinnes they shall remit are remitted to them and hom 5. de verbis Isa Vidi Dominum Speaking of the Sacrament of Penance writeth thus Heaven takes from the earth chief povver for the Iudge sitteth in earth our lord follovv's the seruant and vvhatsoeuer he shall judge here belovv God approu's aboue By the judge that sitteth in earth is meant a Priest whose judgment or sentence goes before and the sentence of God comes after In consequence of which seeing that a sentence meer declaratory cannot goe before but of necessity must follow it is euident that a Priest sacramentally absoluing a penitent is a judge taken in the proper sense wherefore S. Cyprian Epis 73. ad Iubaian S. Ambrose lapsis de poenit c. 1. 2. S. Austin l. 2. con Epis parmeni c. 11. and S. Chrysostome l. 3. de Sacerdot expound the particles vvhose sinnes ye shall forgiue of power and authority giuen vnto the Apostles as judges in order to remitting of sinnes after the similitude of an outward iudicatory Court or Tribunall wherin the penitent acts the accused and the witnesses too and the Priest supplies the part of the (d) The Council of Trent declares that no man can be restored by the Sacrament of Penance to that sanctity and integrity which he receiu'd by baptism without bitter tears and painfull labours judge in the room of Christ it is euidence enough to proue it As in an outward Court of iustice the judg giueth sentence and therby absolueth or condemneth the accused So Christ did thinke fit that a Priest as lawfull judg should pronounce sentence of absolution vnto remission of sins committed after baptisme for Christ in saying Whosoeuers sins ye shall remit are remitted substituted the Apostles * 1. Cor. 5. vbi dixisset Apostol is dedit nobis ministerium reconciliationis subiungit pro Christo ergo legatione fuÌ„givnur id est Sacardotes succedunt in munus seu ministerium reconciliationis eo modo quo Christus reconciliauit homines Deo ramitteÌ„do paccata corum vt constat av citato Textu Et Chryso hom 11. inâ—llam 2. Epis Pauli sic scribit quod igitur pro Christo legatioue fungimur idem est ac si dixisset Christi vice nos enim ipsius muneri successimus his speciall Legats to reconcile sinners to God neither is it of necessity required to the forme of a Sacrament that it be expresly set down in holy scripture the vniuersall tradition of the Church being testimony enough to proue it and euen Caluinists and sundry other sectaries doe vse in baptism the words I baptise thee for which they cannot alleadge any scripture-euidence Besides Caluin in his fourth book of institutions chapter 3. 5. 6. treating of imposition of hands exercised in the ordination of Church-minister's deriueth that ceremony from Church tradition and practice only and confesseth withall that it ought to be counted in lieu of a precept By the premises plainly
appears that Christ 10.2 did not giue to the Apostles and their successors in the function of Priesthood power and authority only to preach remission of sins because the form of speech and circumstances of that action therein expressed doe euidently demonstrate that Christ both spoke and meant of a new power that he had not conferred before his passion but Christ afore his Resurrection inuested his Apostles with power to preach remission of sins Mat. 10. as ye goe saying the kingdom of Heauen is at hand which words euen Caluin in his euangelicall Harmony doth interpret of preaching saluation through remission of sins Wherefore S. Chrysostom hom 85. explaining that passage of S. Iohn compareth the collation of the power that Christ there bestowed on the Apostles to the authority giuen to officers of a tempoall Prince wherby they are enabled to imprison or deliuer out of prison such as be accused of transgressing his lawes and addeth withall these express words Great dignity of Priest's whosoeuers sins sayes be Christ ye shall remit are remitted Again power to preach the Gospell to all nations was giuen to the Apostles Mat. 28. as a distinct office from the power that Christ conferred on them Io. 20. as plainly will appeare to any rationall and iudicious man that shall consider both Texts together with the circumstances therin expressed Neither did Christ confer vpon his apostles and their successors power only to declare remission of sins since he did not say Io. 20. Whosoeuers sins ye shall declare remitted are remitted but whosoeuers sins ye shall remit Besides these words ye shall remit ought to be interpreted in the same sense as those others Are remitted For other wise the form of Christ's speech had been extream improper in regard that both of them shall be remitted and are remitted be vttered in one and the same sentence But the latter particles viz are remitted doe not signify meer declaration of remission of sins for so Christ's words would carry this sense Whosoeuers sins ye shall declare to be remitted are declared to be remitted and consequently since such a declaration is speculatiue only and not practicall effecting nothing in order to remission of sins a man to whom sucÌ„h a declaration is intimated shall remain in sin as much after as before Again Christ after he inuested the Apostles and consequently their successors with the power mentioned Io. 20. said to them as my Father sent me so I send you but Christ was sent by his Father endued with power to remit sins indeed and not to declare remission only Wherfore Mat. 9. that ye may know saith Christ the son of man hath authority in earth to forgiue sins c. Whereby it is plainly euident that he sent his Apostles inuested with power to remit sins giuing vnto them the ministery of reconciliation 2. Cor. 5. Furthermore by the premises is plain that penance is not * Aug. l. 2. de adulterinis contugijs c. 26. distinguit baptismum a pâ—nitentia St inquit à Cathecun eno factum scilicet vxorcidium baptismo abluitur si à baptizato poenitentia reconciliatione a meer remembrance of baptism receiued afore and indeed setting aside * Trident. dicit nos per poenitentia SacramentuÌ„ sine magnis nostris fletibus â—aboribus ad nouitatem integritateÌ„ quam per baptismum adepti eramus peruenire no posse voluntary acts of corporall affliction and inward contrition together with a full purpose of amendment the meer Sacrament of penance hath not power enough to restore the integrity and newness of life got by baptism and lost through actuall sin Again penance hath all requisits necessary to a Sacrament viz. sensible Rites promise of grace and the institution of Christ as by the premises appear's so that together with baptism it makes two Sacraments of the new law and may often (e) The ancient Fathers S. Cyprian Epis 52. S. Ambrose in 2. Cor. 5. S. Austin con Epis parmeni affirme that the Sacrament of Penance may be oft reiterated and it is an article of christian faith grounded on the words of Christ Luc. 17. Mat. 18. where he bid's his Apostles to remit sinnes as often as through humane frailty they are committed which is meant in order to such onely as are sorry to haue sinned for without true sorrow remission cannot be obtain'd be reiterated but baptism cannot For it is impossible that they who are once lightned if they fall away can be renewed again to penance Hebrae 6. where the particle lightned doth signify baptized according to the interpretation of primitiue Fathers who also doe name baptism a light and consequently the words impossible to be renewed again to penance beate this meaning viêªt videlicet Impossible to be baptized again for the particle Again doth import a repetition of what was meant afore by the words lightened and indeed otherwise the particle once had been impertinent and inserted to no purpose at all since once and Again put in the same period or sentence ought to relate to one and the same thing and therefore seeing that by the first place baptism is vnderstood the Apostles doubtless by the latter meant baptism too This cited scripture Hebr. 6. the * Nouatiani pratextu disciplinae Ecclesiasticae lapsis ad Ecclesiam redditum per poenitentiam negarunt ex qua haresi multarum animarum interitus secutus est Nouatians made the ground of their heresy teaching that no man falling into mortall sin after baptism could rise again by penance vnto iustification and Calvin therin growndeth his heresy impiously asserting that it is impossible for any one that deserteth his faith entirely and becometh an apostate to be renewed again by penance vnto remission of his fins therby denying God's generall mercy and so proud contentious men that follow only the meer words of scripture together with their own sense without respect of the Churches judgment and interpretation of ancient Fathers after which euery scripture ought to be expounded plunge themselves into damnable errours CHAR. XI OF CONTRITION THE CONTENTS Two kinds of contrition the one perfect the other imperfect perfect contrition which is formerly or includeth a formall act of charity wherby God in regard of his infinit goodnesse and supreame excellency is preferd before all earthly enjoyments and sin detested was of absolute necessity before the establishing of the law of Christ imperfect contrition called attrition whereby a sinner detesteth his sin because of the deformity thereof or feare of euerlasting punishment joynt to the Sacrament of penance equalleth perfect contrition as to the effect thereof if perfect contrition were of absolute necessity in the new law christians should be in a worse condition then were the Iewes vnder the old law Those which assert absolute necessity of perfect contrition at all tymes in the law of Christ prejudice christian faith Contrition is * Trident. definit contritioneÌ„ per dolorem animae est
autem contritio actus voluntatis non appetitus sensitiui a bitter griese and detestation that a penitent sinner voluntarily conceiues to the punishing of his sin as an offence against God together with a full purpose to confess satisfy and neuer to sin again As the innate heat of new wine put into a close vessel makes to boile the whole substance therof and thereby purgeth out the dregs so the fire of contrition kindled in a penitent soul makes it seeth in teares of bitter sorrow * Psal 50. cor cōtritum humiliatum Deus nō despiciet proinde peccator eliciens contritionem perfectam Deo reconciliatur wherby the filth and vncleanesse of sin together with the ill affection inclining thereto purge away As the heate of the sun doth disperse the black clouds which obstruct its brightnesse so the warmeness of a contrite heart dissipates sins which are the dark clouds obstructing the light therof But there (a) Loue that proceed's from the motiue of charity precisely is perfect and called Amor amicitrae the loue of friendship which imports remission of sinns Loue that comes of the motiue of Gods iustice or feare of him is named Amor benevolentiae loue of good will which is imperfect An example of remission of sinnes by perfect loue or perfect contrition which includes perfect loue without the Sacrament or penance is set down Deut. 4. Jf thou seek our lord God thou shalt finde him if thou seeks him vvithall thine heart and vvith all thy soul be two kinds of contrition the one perfect in as much as a penitent sinner grieueth for and detesteth his sin in regard precisely that he loueth God with all his heart that is maketh Gods own goodness the chief motiue of his loue and in respect therof preferreth him before all earthly enjoyments The other is imperfect and by vsage of speech named Attrition proceeding from a motiue far inferiour to that of a full loue to God For example a sinner conceiueth an act of imperfect contrition or attrition when he grieueth to haue sinned and purposeth amendmēt in regard meerly of the deformity of sin which is it's formall essēce or feare of eternall fire which is the proper effect therof if mortall Perfect contrition was of absolute necessity vnto remission of sins in all times before the establishment of the new law No man euen in the old law did finde God that did not seek him with all his heart and with full tribulation of his soul Deut. 8. which imports perfect contrition notwihstanding the Sacraments and sacrifices thereof they being poor beggerly elements and no effectuall instruments of grace and life Yet in the new law of Christ which is not a law of bondage but of grace not of beggery but of plenty and consequently abounding with sauing priuiledges and prerogatiues aboue the other by diuine dispensation attrition (b) The Council of Trent fess 14. declar's that imperfect contrition called attrition though it be grounded in the feare of Hell or in a serious reflexion on the deformity of sin neuertheless if it exclude an affection to sinning is Donum Dei a gift of God and a motion of the holy Ghost And notwithstanding faith the Council that attrition of it selfe cannot bring a sinner vnto iustification of life howeuer in the Sacrament of Penance it disposeth him thereto Whereby euidently appears that attrition is not the same disposition seperate from that it is ioynt vnto the Sacrament in consequence of which the meaning of the Council is that seeing it is a remote disposition vnto iustification without sacramentall penance ioynt thereto is made an immediate disposition that of necessity procures iustifying grace that of it self is not sufficient enough to bring a sinner vnto iustification of life ioyned to and supported by the Sacrament of penance is an effectuall expedient for the obtaining it and indeed Christians vnder the new law were in a worse condition then the Israëlits vnder the old law if beside perfect contrition God should exact of them as a necessary requisit to remission of sins Confession since he required of the Israëlites perfect contrition only Deut. 4. Wherfore that the trouble implyed in confession of sins might be compensed by taking away the absolute necessity of hearing the other burthen implyed in perfect Contrition Christ hath so instituted the Sacrament of penance in his new law that as water which albeit according to its own naturall propriety hath nothing of heate yet made hot with fire can produce heate so Attrition which though in order to it 's owne vertue is no effectuall instrument of grace to the quickning a dead soul howeuer together with the help of the Sacrament can deliuer out of the lawes of death and restore it to newnesse of life Again if perfect Contrition were of absolute necessity penance ought not to lay claime * Poenitētia est Sacramētum mortuorum nam id ad quod est primo per se institutum est prima gratia sanctificans seu hominem baptizatum in peccata laepsum reconciliare Ita docet Trid. sess 14. can 1. to the Title of Sacramentum mortuorum that is Christ did not institute it for an effectuall help of such (c) The chiefe effect of sacramentall penance is to reconeile vnto God such as haue sinned after their baptism and because mortall sin is the death of the soul sacramentall penance that is specially instituted to confer the first sanctifying grace vnto remitting of deadly offences is called Sacramentum mortuorum a Sacrament of the dead as are dead in sin because it would presuppose allwayes the remission therof perfect Contrition including a full loue of God which is inconsistent with deadly sin and therby would plainly follow that the sacramentall Absolution of a Priest were a meer declaration of sins remitted afore In consequence of which sacramentall penance should not produce the effect which it signifyes to wit remission of sins which is contrary to the nature (d) It is an Article of catholick faith that the Sacraments of the new law produce sanctifying grace ex opere operato that is by the efficacy of their working after the manner of naturall causes which employe their whole actiuity while they worke so that the Sacrament of penance produces ex opere operato a greater or lesser measure of grace according to the greater or lesser dispositions of those which receiue it As to the form of speaking ex opere operato taken in the passiue signification it is ancient Pope Innocentius the third vsed it and the catholick Church in the Council of Trent receiu'd it which makes it a matter of faith of the Sacraments of the new law they being by vertue of their institution practicall Rites or signes for the effecting of sanctifying grace which indeed they signifie and to say that perfect contrition includeth a desire of the Sacrament of penance hath nothing of weight with it to weaken this
catholick doctrine For if perfect contrition together with the said desire shall allwaies be necessarily required vnto remission of sins and that before the outward working of the Sacrament it is evidently plain that the grace wherby a sinner is iustifyed ought neuer to to counted the product of the said Sacraments immediate working which inference if it were granted would prejudice catholick faith it teaching that the Sacraments of the new law in vertue of their institution do confer sanctifying grace ex opere operato that is through their own outward immediat working and efficacy For example the outward sensible washing of water in baptism together with the outward sensible vttering of certaine words viêªt videlicet I baptise thee doe actually produce grace and life if no impediment interuene being sensible actions instituted by Christ himselfe for that intent and purpose wherby is clearly manifest again that if * Facultas Parisiensis An. 1638. die Iulij 1. notauit censura banc propositioneÌ„ Attritione de peccatis insufficientem esse pro accipiedae remissione peccatoruÌ„ in Sacramento poenitentiae contritionem ex perfecta charitate ad id necessariaÌ„ esse cum hac altara propositione ex priori sequeÌ„te Absolutionem SacrameÌ„talem nihil aâ—â—ud esse quaÌ„ declarationem iuridicam peccati iam ramissi perfect contrition proceeding from a full loue of God which is inconsistent with deadly sin were of absolute necessity at all times the Sacrament of penance at no tyme should produce sanctifying grace by it's own outward working and efficacy because it would allwaies be preuented by perfect contrition which is opus operantis onely that is to say an action or working of a penitent sinner through an actuall motion of the Holy Ghost which of necessity would bring with it sanctifying grace before the sacramentall absolution and consequently before the perfecting of the Sacrament of penance sacramentall absolution being the sole form thereof Wherfore though contrition as it doth abstract from perfect and imperfect be an essentiall part of the Sacrament of penance yet perfect contrition is not because imperfect contrition or attrition as it is a supernaturall motion of God ioyned to the Sacrament (e) S. Austin l. de Catech. rudibus cap. 17. expresly affirm's that attrition which through speciall assistance of diuine grace is procur'd by the feare of Hell or by a desire of eternall life ioyn'd to the Sacrament of Baptism is a sufficient expedient vnto obtaining remission of deadly sinnes in order to those which are grown vp to full yeares of discretion But if attrition be a sufficient disposition to procure sanctifying grace in the Sacrament of baptism it must likewise be a sufficient disposition vnto producing the same effect in the Sacrament of penance being there is full parity between the one and the other Sacrament for both baptism and penance haue power by their institution to confer the first sanctifying grace vnto remitting of mortall sinnes and therefore be named Sacramenta mortuorum Sacrament's of the dead is a sufficient disposition vnto the obtaining remission of sins in so much that a penitent who is attrite only in vertue of the Sacrament is * Est axiâ—ma apud Theologos Attritus per Sacramentum sit contritus made contrite that is is enabled to receiue grace of iustification which is the proper effect of perfect contrition Wherfore a meer act of attrition founded * Isaiae 26. oculi Domini super metuentes eum in timoretuo Domine concepimus parturiuimus peperimus spirituÌ„ salutis Et Aug. ser 1. timor qui coÌ„cipit poeniteÌ„tiam parit compunctionem cordis quae importat remissionem peccati either in hope of eternall life or in feare of eternall death or in abhorrence of sin in respect of it's filthinesse being by the power of the Sacrament inuested with the power of perfect contrition draweth from the heart of a penitent the poyson of sin and as physick doth first afflict and afterward heale a diseased body so attrition made a soueraingn medecine in vertue of the Sacrament doth first trouble a soul sick of sin with bitternesse of grief and afterward worketh a perfect cure on it So that a sinner is truly reconciled to God that for feare of his iustice detesteth sin and turneth to penance (f) According to S. Austin ser 10. de tempore to confesse and not to abstain from sin is rather to excuse our faults then to amende them neither are our soul 's heal'd thereby Wherfore the holy scriptures commande sinners to cast from them their iniquities and neuer to returne to them again Iohn 5. Behold thou art made vvhole sinne no more lest a vvorse thing come vnto thee And Ioan. 8. goe and sinne no more confessing against himselfe his wicked ness together with a full purpose to make him a new heart and a new spirit for the future casting away all affection to his former transgressions and truly t' is impossible for a sinner to put on the new * Aug. trac de poenitentia nemo fue libero arbitrio potest inchoare nouam vitam nisi de priori se poeniteat huc spectat illud Ezech. c 18. si impius egerit poenitentiam ab omnibus peccatis suis quae operatus est omnium iniquitatum eius non recordabor hac est prudentia leonis qui ne inveniatur à venatoribus cauda sua vestigia operit without putting of the old man with his workes he must for sake the old wayes of death if he will enter into newnesse of life Howeuer acts of sorrow and detestation in order to sin euen ioyned to the Sacrament are drie vnlesse they be moystned * Psal 6. lauo per singulas noctes lectum meum lacrymis psal 118. ab oculis meis fluxerunt magni aquae riuuli quia non custodierunt legem tuam with teares which in as much as they flow from a heart truly penitent be Gods speciall delight (g) According to S. Gregory tears shed for our sinnes procure diuine mercy and according to S. Bernard the tear's of a Penitent soul are Angels wine which reioyce ouer a sinner doing penance the Angells wine and vndoubted tokens of a sinners renewed alliance with Heauen Philo the prime Historian among the Iewes relateth that Dauid and Ionathas did so passionatly loue eath other that at one tyme in their reciprocall embracements they shed tears in such plenteous measure that they were receiued in vessels and reserued as pledges of that vehement freindship mutuall expressed The hearty teares of a penitent sinner heauenly Angells receiue preserue and offer as the gratefullest libations to God wittnessing thereby that he hath cast away from him all his transgressions and made him a new heart and a new spirit and indeed no repentance that doth not bring with it newness of life is of any value or consequence as to eternall blessednesse Antiochus 2. Machab. 9. although he came to the
argue a precept obliging all to marry For those words cannot carry a command since they were vttered to men and beast alike which are not capable of a precept howeuer if God therby had commanded marriage it cannot be meant in order to all men joynt and seperate for thence it plainly followeth that Abel (n) In the law of Moses Iosue Elias Elisaeus and Ieremy renown'd for sanctity of life were neuer marryed according to S. Hierom and S. Ambrose Besides 2. Machabae express mention is made of reclus'd Virgin 's in the Temple And it matters not that the sacred Text. Deut. 7. saith that there shall be neither male nor female barren among you For neither the one nor th other was counted barren because of being vnmarried but in regard in marriage they wanted children which kind of barreness was counted in those dayes as a reproach or malediction because God had promised plenty of children to married people that obseru'd his commandement's Iosue Daniel S. Iohn Baptist S. Iohn Euangelist and sundry others which led their life 's in all chastity did transgress a diuine law and consequently sinned mortally which were a blasphemy to say of such godly Persons Again from the words of the Apostle 1. Cor. 7. for to auoide fornication let euery man haue his wife and let euery woman haue her own husband they as weakly infer marriage to be enioyned euery man and euery woman for the Text is meant of such as are married already and so the Apostle doth interpret his meaning saying in the same Chapter Art thou bonnd to a wife seeke not to be loosed Art thou loosed from a wife seeke not a wise be that giueth his Virgin to marriage doth well and be that giueth her not to marriage doth better wherfore the alleadged words be vttered in respect of the marryed the Apostle signifying therby that although it were good for a man not to touch a woman or for a woman not to touch a man but to abide euen as he did a chast Virgin neuerthelesse he asserteth it lawfull for euery married man to vse his wife and for euery married woman to vse her husband that therby fornications and other vncleanesses may be auoided In like manner they abuse the scripture 1. Timoth. 3. and Titus 3. that say a Bishop must be a husband of one wife arguing thence an Apostolicall precept obliging a Bishop to take a wife for it plainly appeares by the Apostles own practice and sundry Council's and the ancientest Fathers-testimonies that S. Paul did not mean that a Bishop after his ordination might marry or if married afore might lawfully perform the act of Matrimony because there is not one example in all antiquity that shews permission giuen (o) According to the custom of the primitiue Church no married man could be ordain'd vnless he had promised afore his ordination continency with his wifes consent as seuerall Councils haue declar'd and Iouinian the Heretick ingenuously confesseth this truth according to S. Hierom. l. 1. adversus Iouinia Thou confesseth saith this great Doctour to Jouinian that he cannot be à Bishop that beget's children in his Diocese othervvise if he be perceiu'd he shall not be counted as a Husband but he condenm'd as an adulterer to the married to be ordained Bishops or Priests vnless first they had made a promise of continency together with their wiues consent thereto and their promise to liue in all continency likewise wherfore the true meaning of the Apostles words is that a man which hath been married more then once ought not to be ordained a Bishop and so of necessity he meant both in regard the place cannot be vnderstood in reference to Polygamie which signifies marriage of one single man with many women together polygamy being inconsistent with Christian religion as also because the (p) According to the ancient Fathers namely S. Hilary in Psal 117. Epiphan haer 5. 8. S. Hierom l. 1. con Iouian S. Austin l. de gra lib. arb cap. 4. S. Paul was neuer married Howeuer Clement Alexandri and onely he asserted a contrary opinion conceiuing that he was able to proue from holy scripture that S. Paul had been married but Theodoret Oecumenius count's it folly to inâ—er from holy scripture S. Pauls marriage Apostle Timothy and Titus were Bishops vnmarried as doth witness all antiquity but S. Paul with great reason permitted such as were but once married to be ordained Bishops because among the people of Creet where he was the chief Church-gouernour it was a difficult business to finde Virgins the * Secundum Baronium in Annal Eccles ad an Christi 58. leges Cretensium cogebant vt quilibet à puero vxorem duceret lawes of that Country commanding euery man and woman to marry as note h Baronius in his Ecclesiasticall Annals Moreouer in fauour of Priest's marriage they doe alledge S. Paul's word's that say Thess 13. Marriage is honourable in all and the bed vnpolluted inferring from thence an obligation vpon euery man to marry which inference doth carry a manifest weakness for it is certaine that the marriage of adulterers and adulteresses is dishonourable and infamous besides marriage contracted between Brother and sister is not honourable wherfore the true meaning of the Apostle is that marriage ought to be honourable among ass that is to say the married ought so to haue marriage in honour as to know how to possess his vessel in honour and holinesse and not in the iust of concupiscence as the Gentils which knew not God 1. Thessal 4. and though marriage in it self be honourable and a great Sacrament neuertheless that doth not hinder the Church to constitute a law obliging the ordained to refrain from marriage since she forceth none to receiue ordination and to prohibit marriage in order to ecclesia â—icks is not to condemne it altogether as vnlawfull and diabolicall as did Simon Magus Saturnius and those other Marcionist's which are meant by the Prophecy of S. Paul 1. Timoth. 4. In the latter times some shall depart from the faith forbidding to marry Furthermore the afore mentioned sectaries to proue the lawfullnesse of their own Priests marriages doe produce S. Paul himself for a President saying that this great Apostle was married and led about his wife by the name of sister 1. Cor. 9. haue we not power to leade about a woman a sister and by the name of a faithfull companion Philip vltimo I beseech thee my faithfull companion wherby doth appeare their extream peruersness or blindness contradicting the consenting testimonies of the ancientest Fathers which assert this Apostles virginity as he himself doth also 1. Cor. 7. therfore I say vnto the vnmarried and vnto the widdowes it is good for them if they abide euen as I doe wherfore doubtless 1. Cor. 9. he doth not mean by a woman a sister a wife but some other deuout Christian woman that after the manner of Iewry did furnish him with necessaries
is a holy thing and ought to be obseru'd and perform'd in holines which doctrine is conform to the Apostles instructions 1. Cor. 7. He that giueth his Virgin in marriage doth vvell And Hebrae 13. Marriage honorable in all that is in all those which are indeed lawfully married In consequence of which the act of generation in persons married aright is both lawfull and honorable but in such as are not lawfully marryed together it is damnable 1. Timoth. 5. For example in Brothers and sister's and in Virgins that haue vow'd to God perpetual chastity consummation of marriage through carnall copulation though it be lawfull honest and laudable hauing a lawfull honest and laudable end which is the generation and education of children for the propagation and conseruation of mankinde neuertheless it addeth no essentiall perfection vnto marriage being extrinsecall therunto only Howeuer God in the begining made and determinated but (e) T' is set down Gen. 1. God created them male and female in the singular number and Gen. 2. they shall be two in one flesh wherfore S. Innocent cap. Gaudemus dediuortijs faith that one rib onely was converted into one and not into many women one man and one woman to contract marriage as t' is said afore forming of one rib one woman only wherby t' is plain that Polygamy which is a plurality of wiues in order to one man can challenge no institution from the begining and indeed such plurality setting aside extraordinary means for supplying of naturall imperfections is destructiue at least of the secondary end of marriage which is a sweet sociable liuing together of man and wife as appeareth by the example of Sara and Agar Gen. 16. of Anna and Phenenna 1. Reg. Again it is not consonant as to the law of nature that a man hauing once giuen the power of his body to one woman by marriage should afterward giue it to an other yet in as much as Polygamy in order to many wiues is not absolutely prohibited by any naturall ordinance and is consistent with the principall end of marriage which is procreation and education of children God can and hath de facto dispensed in it for both Sara and Agar were rightfull wiues of Abraham the Patriarch as likewise Anna and Phenenna of Alcana and Lia and Rachel of Iacob being the scripture praiseth these men for their great sanctity of life without reproaching vnto them plurality of wiues (f) Doubtless persons renown'd for sanctity of life would neuer haue married many wiues vnless God had inspir'd them and the ancient Fathers S. Hierom. Ep. 83. ad Ocia and S. Austin l. 22. con Faus affirme that God dispensed with the Patriarchs and Iews in the plurality of wiues But this Indulgence began onely in the dayes of Noe who taught it his posterity for neither Adam nor any other married many wiues before the generall deluge except Lameth Gen. 4. who therfore was counted an adulterer and is reproch'd for that same act by Pope Nicholas in an Epistle written to king Lotherius And albeit according to holy scripture all the wiues of one singleman except the first be sometymes nam'd Concubins neuerthelesse t' is not meant therby that the others were not true and lawfull but that they were secundary wiues which were also true and lawfull wiues And doubtless God inspired these holy men to doe so that therby maÌ„kinde might be sooner propagated and the diuine blessings promised to the children of Israel fullfilled wherof one was increase and multiplication of children As God after the generall deluge appointed the flesh of beasts to be meate for Noah and his posterity without any restriction at all Gen. 5. and afterward restrained that appointment or concession limitting it in order to the flesh of such beasts as by the law of Moyses were counted clean and vnpolluted and lastly â—nulling that restriction reduced the eating of flesh to the first concession so in the begining God instituted Monogamy that is to say marriage between one man and one woman only afterward he granted Polygamy that is power to take many wiues and lastly reuoked the concession of many wiues and reduced marriage * Matth. 15. ab initio non fuit sic id est ab initio non fuit Poligamia to it's first institution as also raised it which afore was a ciuil contract only to the dignity of a Sacrament (g) The Council of Constance sess 15. declar's marriage between persons baptiz'd and fit to contract a Sacrament of the new law taken in the proper sense Likewise the Council of Florence In the Decree of Pope Eugenius and Trent sess 24. cap. vnico can 1. Besid's the Apostle Eph. 5. nameth marriage a great Sacrament that is the marriage of those which are baptiz'd for of such only he speak's in the Chapter set down saying For yee were once darknes but novv light in our lord that is through baptism for according to holy scriptures and ancient Fathers baptiz'd and lightned importe the same thing for now marriage contracted by persons that are baptised and enabled to contract is a * Sentiunt communiter Theologi quodlibet matrimoniuÌ„ validè contractum inter duas personas baptizatas esse propriè Sacramentum nec duae personae baptizatae validè contrahentes possunt facere vt illud non sit validum vbi obserua quod pecunia quae datur in matrimonio non datur pro matrimonio sed pro eius oneribus nempe pro nutritione familiae educations filiorum id genus alijs Jdeoque inde non committitur simonia Sacrament of the new law taken in the proper sense being cloathed with all requisits necessary ther to for first it is an outward sensible ceremony in as much as it is a contract expressed in outward words or other sensible signs secondly it doth effectually sanctifie such as receiue it aright through a speciall grace that is conferred on the married to loue each other mutuall after the imitation of that reciprocall loue and charity which is between Christ and his Church in respect wherof the Apostle Eph. 5. calleth the marriage of the faithfull baptised Magnum Sacramentum a great Sacrament but I speake sayes he in order to Christ and the Church exhorting withall husband's to loue their wiues euen as Christ loued the church which is his wife that was taken and formed out of his own side hanging vpon the cross a mystery S. Aug. often inculcates as Eue Adams wife was made of his rib and consequently bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh wherby is plainly manifest that the marriage of Christians lies iust claime to diuine institution also since there is no outward sensible signe or ceremony that effectually produceth sanctifying grace in the new law which is not instituted by Christ according to that of S. Iohn cap. 1. Grace and truth came by Iesus-Christ by the premises appeares that the marriages of vnbaptised persons (b)
According to S. Austin l. de bono coniug c. 24. euery marriage is in order to generation but christian marriage onely is inuested with the dignity of a Sacrament haue nothing of a Sacrament taken in the proper sense viz for an outward practicall sign of sanctifying grace that is for a sensible ceremony that in vertue of it's institution can effectually sanctify which is an effect proper only to the Sacrament's of the new law wherof Baptism is the doore howeuer they be ciuill contracts conformable to the law of nature and by no diuine law forbidden and therfore lawfull * 2. Cor. 6. Nolite ducere iugum cū infidelibus yet the marriage of a christian belieuer with an infidell of what kinde soeuer when there appeareth danger of subuersion therby is against the dictates of nature which oblige euery one to auoide whatsoeuer tendes to his ruine in consequence whereof such marriages be vnlawfull in respect wherof the Apostle 2. Cor. 6. forbiddeth the Corinthians conuerted to the faith of Christ to beare the yoake with Infidells which is meant in regard of the danger as to subuersion and indeed no diuine ordinance making such marriages vnlawfull appeares either by the old or new Testament for Salomon euen at that time when the old scripture reported him to be loued of God and to walk in all the commandements of his Father Dauid married the daughter of Pharao and though God Exod. 34. prohibited Moses to make any compact with the Amorites and the Cananites which adored false Gods or to take wiues of their daughters for his sons (i) S. Austin l. de fide operibus c. 19. treating of marriages between Catholick's and Hereticks affirm's that in his dayes they were not counted as sinnes because in the new Testament nothing is commanded in Order to such marriages neuerthelesse that diuine prohibition according to the precise form of speech was in reference only to the danger of subuersion which by the law of nature euery man is obliged to auoide for God maketh the eminent danger of their ruine to be the ground of his prohibition adding these words Lest their daughters goe a fornicating after their Gods and make thy sons goe a fornicating after their Gods neither doth the new Testament expresse any speciall law that prohibiteth christians to marry with Infidells Besides in the primitiue times (k) Clodoueus king of France was conuerted to the faith of Christ by the means of his Queen that was a christian Again S. Monica S. Austins Mother preuail'd with her husband and S. Cicily with her spouse Valerianus to embrace the christian Religion which verifies what the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 7. The vnbelieuing husband is sanctifyed by a belieuing wife sundry gallant women for vertue and sanctity were yoked with vnbelieuing husbands and the supream prouidence blessed their marriages with happy success vsing them as a means to bring their said husbands to the marueilous light of christian faith Notwithstanding the catholick Church wisely considering that many spirituall subuersions and other great inconueniences arose from such marriages hath euen anciently prohibited and annulled them that is hath disenabled christians to beare the yoke with Infidells wherby is euident that the marriage of a Catholick with an Heretick is vnlawfull in respect of an ecclesiasticall constitution only * Ex cap. ex literis extra de consuetudine talis cōsuetudo quae est in Polonia aequipollet legi sed lex posterior potest abrogare priorē which in Poland and germany seemeth to be abrogated by a contrary custome introduced with the tacite consent at least of the Churches chief Pastor the Churches consent express or tacite being a necessary requisite to the introducing of a Custome vnto the abrogating of an ecclesiasticall law in regard of Catholicks and hereticks promiscuous liuing together and the toleration of them both (l) As to the marriages of Catholicks with Hereticks that matter of controuersy was at sundry tymes disputed before Pope Clement the 8. by many learned Cardinalls and other famous diuin's which with one accord declar'd that his Holines might lawfully grant leaue vnto a Catholick to marry with an Heretick or Infidel and in Poland and Germany where there is toleration of one and the other profession and where Catholicks and Hereticks liue promiscuously together such marriages are vsuall and common either in regard in those countryes it is a Custome introduced through a tacite consent of the sea Apostolick which hath abrogated the ecclesiasticall law that forbiddeth such marriages and they be forbidden in the Councils Laodis sub Syluestro Carthag 3. and others or because in those Countries which giue freedom in the exercise of euery Christian profession there is no morall apparent danger of subuersion as to to Catholicks And it matters not that when a catholick man or woman marrying with an Heretick knowes that the party he or she that marryes will minister and receiue the Sacrament vnworthily for the marriage thereby no more ceases to be a Sacrament then Baptism ceaseth to be a Sacrament vnworthily receiu'd neither doth the Catholick sinne therby because Vtitur iure suo duntaxat For example a man that through necessity borrow's money of an vsurer whom he knows morally will exact vnlawfull lucre doth not offend because he vseth but his own right and the vsurer if he would might cōmit no sin being in his power to pleasure his neighbour in an vrgent necessity without exacting or expecting gain for the loan of his money which probably taketh away eminent dāgerof subuersion in order to a Catholick man or woman so marrying and his or her children howeuer it doth not lie in the Churches power to loose the knot of christian marriage after consummation hath tied it vpon any occasion whatsoeuer either for adultery or any other enormous crime so as to giue leaue to the innocent party to marry again whiles the other liueth for no humane authority can put a sunder that which God coupled together wherfore the Apostle saies 1. Cor. 7. And to the married I command not I but our lord let not the wife depart from her husband where he expresseth a double departure the one vniust forbidden by the words set downe the other iust in respect of a lawfull cause namely fornication which he alloweth vpon condition only adding But if she depart let her remain vnmarried or he reconciled vnto her husband signifying therby the bond of marriage to be vndissoluble Again Christ Math. 5 reuoking the bill of diuorcement that God had granted to the Iews during the old law because of the hardness of their hearts and reducing marriage to the institution it had in the begining of creation said to the Pharisies Whosoeuer shall put away his wife except for * Nomine adulterij siue formeationis intelligitur omnis copula illicita violans sidem matrimonij per diuisionē carnis cōtra illud erūt duo in carne vna fornication
dari non debeat nisi infirmo de cuius morte timetur ideo Patres Trident. vocant sacram vnctionem exeuntium Sacrameutū danger of death in respect of extream sickness or other inward infirmity is strengthned through holy vnction against the assaults of deuills and purged of veniall sin 's together with mortall offences vnwittingly forgotten afore and therfore named Extrem-vnction being administred only in extremity of sickness Albeit that the common enemy seeketh occasion at all times to deuour our souls yet then especially he employeth his greatest subtilities and craftiest dealings to bring vs into despaire of Gods sauing mercy when he seeth vs at the point of drawing our last breath of life Christ after his Resurrection instituted and S. Iames his Apostle promulgated this Sacrament to the catholick Church in the fist Chapter of his catholick epistle saying If any be sick among you let him bring in the Priests of the Church and let them pray ouer him anointing him with * Nomine olei absolusè simpliciter positi sēper intelli gitut oleum oliuarum id est liquor ex baccis oliuarum expressus alij autam humores pingues vt nucum id genus alij nō nisi eum addito dicūtur osea oile in the name of our lord and the prayer of faith shall saue the sick and our lord shall raise him vp and if he hath committed sinnes they shall be forgiuen him wherby he expresseth the necessary requisit's to a Sacrament of the new law First the outward sign or ceremony is signified by the words anointing with oile which declare the proper sensible matter of Extrem-vnction viz oile made of Oliues for that only challengeth the name of oile taken in the proper sense as wine of the vine the name of wine Secondly the sensible sacramentall form (b) According to S. Austin the making vp of a Sacrament is the putting together of the sacramentall word and the sacramentall element or matter Accedit saith he Verbum ad clementum fit Sacramentum And the sacramentall word trac 8. in Joan. he calleth the word of faith vttered together with vnction is expressed by the words Let them pray ouer him anointing him with oile which in as much as they be ioyned together with the matter do make the Sacrament Thirdly diuine institution is plainly declared by the particles in the name of our lord for the true meaning of these words let them pray ouer him anointing him with oile in the name of our lord is this let them pronounce ouer him the form of this Sacrament which is after the manner of a prayer and anoint him with oile (c) A Priest in dispensing the Sacraments supplies the room of Christ The Sacrament of Extrem-vnction is dispensable onely in order to the faithfull of Christ wherefore the Apostle vseth the particles if any be sick amongst you that is among you faithfull baptised for he direct's his Epistle to the faithfull onely in regard wherof t' is called the Catholick Epistle of S. Iames. in the room of Christ that is in vertue of the power and authority deriued vnto them from Christ which import's diuine institution and doubtlesse the Apostle meant that the whole entire action to wit vnction together with prayer of faith ought to be performed by a Priest as the rightfull Minister of Christ For in that sense he vsed the said particles In the name of our lord in the same Chapter speaking of the Prophets who haue spoken say's he in the name of our lord that is which were inuested with power and authority to speake in the room of our lord and indeed the holy Prophets were our lord's Minister's prophecying in vertue of his speciall inspiration and commission In the same sense the Apostle S. Paul 1. Cor. 5. vseth the particles in the name of our lord to signify that he excommunicated the incestuous Corinthian in the person of our lord Iesus-Christ saying I haue iudged him in the name of our lord Iesus-Christ to be deliuered vnto Satan for the destruction of the flesh c. Fourthly the effect of this Sacrament viz sanctifying grace these words do clearly express And our lord shall raise him vp and if he hath committed sins they shall be forgiuen him for sins are not remitted but by the infusion of sanctifying grace wherby also the diuine institution of this Sacrament is euident enough because Christ only in the new law by his speciall institution hath cloathed outward sensible rites or ceremonies with power to produce grace and remission of sins effectually And it matters not that the Apostle addeth to vnction the particles and the prayer of faith shall saue the sick for he doth not ascribe the effect of that ceremony to the prayer as if it alone were sufficient enough to cause it for therby it would euidently follow that he mentioneth and requireth vnction in vaine and to no purpose at all besid's he maketh vse of no particle that excludeth vnction but plainly signifie's by saying let them praey ouer him the sick anointing him with oyle that he attribute's grace and remission of sins to the whole entire action as it consisteth of vnction and orall prayer proceeding from and relying on the faith if not of the Minister himself which is not necessary to the effect of the Sacrament at least of the Church whose person the minister supplyeth in the administration therof and truly in the Sacraments of the new law the verball form doth more plainly and determinatly express the sacramentall effect then doth the sacramentall matter and therfore the Apostle by adding and the prayer of faith c. will signify only that the sacramentall form of this Sacrament lies claim to the best and noblest part of causality in the production of sanctifying grace but not to all the parts therof Fiftly by these words let him bring in the (d) S. Iames in the Chapter set down vseth the name Presbyter S. Luke Act. 15. S. Peter cap. 5. and S. Iohn Epis 1.2.3 vse the name Senior but both the names carry the same meaning they signify those which by holy ordination are inuested with priestly dignity and authority vnto dispensing the mysteries of God for as S. Hierom assert's Epis 85. and Euag. in the scripture-Text's set down those are meant which are Priests as to office dignity and function Besid's the Fathers in the Council of Trent and all catholick writers vnderstand per presbyteros Ecclesiae such onely as are Priests rightly ordain'd whether they be Bishops or meer Priests and according to the scripture custome in the name Presbyteri Bishops are comprehended Priests the ministers of the Sacrament are declared and determinated namely such only as are actually promoted in vertue of holy ordination vnto Episcopall or Priestly function and truly the new Testament when speaking of Church Ministers vseth the word Presbyter or Senior meaneth therby one inuested with Priestly dignity besides the Apostle could not mean
habetis Aaron Hurvobiscum si quid natum fuerit quaestionis referetis ad eos Aaron and Hur Iudges for the deciding all differences which might arise in the congregation during his absence Exod. 24 wherefore Christ infallibly hath ordained and appointed spirituall Gouernors of necessary and perpetuall vse in his Church for the deciding all controuersies of faith and religion and for the preseruing of it in holiness to the world's end this doctrine is plainly euidenced by sundry most cleare prophesies vttered by Christ himselfe viz. Math. 16. the gates of hell shall neuer preuaile against it Math. 18. if he refuse to heare the Church let him be vnto thee as an heathen man and a publican and Ioa. 16. the holy Ghost shall teach you all truth Whereby clearly appear's that the very office of supream Iudge in order to deciding matters concerning faith and religion is proper to the Church and truly the Church and no other thing distinct from it can rightfully challenge the full essentiall proprietys or conditions here vnto required For example * In supremo iudice cōtrouersiarū requiri veritatem infallibilem in definiendo non tantum catholici sed illorū aduersarij fatentur v. g. vvhittakerus contro 10 de scrip quas 5. can 8. in 3. suo argumento alij quādo de hac re agunt Vnd. Ang. l. 1. de moribus Ecclesiae catholicae ait illam esse magistram totius sapientiae christianorum magistram castissimam not to be liable to errour at all in defining controuersies of faith and religion is one essentiall propertie in fallible verity being of necessitie ioyned to the authority of a supream Iudg that declareth sentence of iudgment in matters relating to faith which is inconsistent with errour and falshood God by a speciall and supernaturall prouidence hath constituted this Iudg in his place and appointed him as his immediate Ambassadour to propound to all christians the verity of faith least they be carryed about with euery wind of doctrine by the craftiness of Satan which office or employment he could not execute if he were fallible in the execution thereof neither should christians acquiess in his proposalls and definitiue sentences vnless they knew or supposed him infallible that is not liable to errour matters of faith depending of diuine reuelation which is not seen An other necessary propriety required in the supream Iudg is authority to exact obedience vnto his ordinances which essentiall propriety Christ declared when speaking of the scribes and Pharisies sitting in Moyses chaire Math. 23. he said all therfore whatsoeuer they bid you obserue that obserue and doe where the particles whatsoeuer they bid you obserue importe power and authority to propound vnto the Iews what they were to belieue and the particles that obserue and doe import an obligation to admit and receiue their ordinances and indeed euery common-wealth hath a supream Iudg or magistrate that propoundeth laws and ordinances vnto subiects and commandeth their compliance thereunto A third necessary propriety or condition required in this supream Iudg is to be visible and a cleare speaker Moyses visible and liuing said of himselfe as supream Iudg of the faithfull in those times Exod. 18. When they haue a matter of controuersy they come vnto mee and I iudg between one and another and declare the ordinances of God and the laws also this necessary condition appeareth by the command giuen to the people of Israel Deut. 17. thou shalt come vnto the Priests of the Leuites and to the Iudg that shall be in those daies and aske and they shall shew thee the sentence of iudgment besides Christs own words Math. 23. whatsoeuer they bid you obserue doe sufficiently manifest that the head Priests which sate in Moyses seate were visible liuing Iudges and indeed there is no ciuill nation that hath not a visible liuing and speaking law that is to say a supream Iudg or magistrate visible liuing and speaking for an vnliud and mute Iudg namely a meer written law cannot Iudg between one and another pronounce sentence of iudgment to the punishing of peruerse offenders or to declare ordinances to the suppressing of controuersies That the proprieties of this supream Iudg thus explaned be proper to the (b) By the Church is meant the high tribunall of faithfull Priests wherof the Chief visible head is the Bishop of Rome seated in the Chair of S. Peter and as he is the Chief and supream head so he is supream Iudge in consequence of which whosoeuer is affraid to be circumuented by the hardness of a question he ought to recur to him Church of Christ taken in the proper sense for a congregation of belieuing Christians including the supream visible Pastour it is plainly demonstrable for example that this Church is not liable at all to errour which is the first propriety appeares by Christs testimony alledged before Math. 16. the gates of hell shall not preuaile against it which importeth an absolute infallibility in defining propounding and teaching matters of faith for if the power of Satan that consisteth in crafty dealings to draw men into errour could ouercome the Church by making it teach any one false doctrine it would follow euidently that the gates of hell might preuaile against it in consequence of which Christ should not be faithfull in his promises Besids Christ saying Ioan. 19. the holy Ghost shall teach you all truth meant that the Church should teach nothing of errour to the worlds end and indeed that promise was made to the Apostles and their successours in the ministery and Gouernmēt of the Church because Christ before Ioa. 14. had said expresly that the spirit of truth should abide with them for euer wherfore * Aug. l. de mor. Ecclesia catholica ait si quis metuit falli difficult ate alicuius quaestionis ad Ecclesiā esse recurrendū Jtem ait Christū habere Ecclesiā loco Synagogae Et Tom. 6. con Epis Manichaeorū Non crederem inquit Euangelio nisi Ecclesiae catholicae authoritas me cōmoueret whosoeuer is affraid least he may be deceiued through the difficulty of a hard question he ought to recur to the Church established in the room of the Synagogue for as the Pharisies and Scribes teaching in the Chaire of Moyses could not deuiate from the truth so neither can the pastours of our Christian Church sitting in the Chaire of S. Peter Secondly that the Church is inuested with power and authority to exacte from the faithfull obedience to her ordinances which is the second propriety of this supream Iudg Christ Math. 18. plainly declareth saying if he refuse to heare the Church let him be vnto thee as a heathen man and a publican that is let him be excommunicated as appeareth by Christs words immediatly following * Verba illa Christi quaecunque alligaueritis super terram intelligenda sunt de censuris ecclesiasticis id etiam fatetur Cal. l. 4. insti Whatsoeuer
controuersies in debate for as much as they relate to faith Furthermore God who is not an accepter of persons Rom. 15. who is not God of men only but of women also and who desireth to saue all of each sex doubtless instituted a remedy against originall sin in fauour of men and women for as much as the expiation thereof is absolutely necessary vnto saluation wherfore in regard circumcision was the remedy proper to men and could not be applied to women some other expedient was ordained for their cure and although no express mention thereof be made in any part of the old Testament neuertheless that God instituted a remedy for the deliuerance of women * Quod qualeue fuerit illud remedium à Deo institutum ad subueniēdum faeminis quae nascebantur in peccato originali nullibi explicatur in sacris litteris nec porest deduci ex illis from the guilt of originall sin the Iews belieued as an article of faith necessary to saluation and indeed so it was as appeareth from the necessity of it and from the prouidence God hath ouer both men and women and truly to auerre that God was defectiue then in necessary requisits to the saluation of women is a manifest blasphemy wherby it is clear that euen the Iews in the old law held vnwritten besides written tradition as necessary vnto saluation neither is the said unwritten tradition preiudiced by the reply of some sectaries saying that the oblation of women in the Temple according to the law of Moyses did free them of originall sin For that legall offring was common alike to women and men and Christ was both circumcised and offered in the Temple nor by recurring for this deliuerance vnto the circumcision of Parents there being not any passage in the whole Testament of the old law that carrieth the least sound that way or that hath relation to the deliuerance of women from originall sin in vertu of their parents circumcision besides S. Austin and other ancient Fathers expresly teach that baptism is to Christians as circumcision was to the Iewes but no Christian sectary will say that women are sanctified and consecrated to God through their parents baptism for if it were enough for the purging out of originall sin to baptise the male there would be no need at all to baptise the female sex hereby it is clear again that the Iews of the old law allowed and professed vnwritten besides written traditions as necessary to saluation From the premises appeareth that the word of God taken precisely comprehendeth both vnwritten and written traditions in consequence of which vnwritten traditions are not additions to the word of God they being a part therof Wherfore neither Moyses Deut. 4. saying to the people of Israel Ye shall adde nothing to the word which I speake to you neither shall ye take ought from it Nor S. Paul Gal. 1. saying to the Galatians though that we or an Angel from Heauen preach vnto you (h) According to S. Austin tom 7. con liter petiliani l. 3. cap. 6. and tom 9. trac 98. in Io. the particle praeterquam besids in the cited Text imports the particle contra against or contrary so that the meaning is that nothing must be preached against or contrary to the holy scripture And truly this explication appears euidently by the Apostles arguing against those that asserted Iudaism to be consistent with christianism which assertion because it was contrary to the law of Christ the Apostle added the curse set down in the same sentence of the Text. Moreouer the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Latin Interpreter translateth praeterquam is vsed by the Apostle for contra not only in the Epistle alledged ad Gal. but also Rom. 4. besids what we haue preached vnto you let him be accursed condemne vnwritten traditions as sectaries do calumniate the Catholick Church besides sectaries very vnhandsomly and weakly do infer from these two scripture testimonies that no doctrines of faith ought to be receiued saue such as be contained expresly in or by euident consequence deduced from the written word of God for neither of both doe mention the written word of God The word says Moyses which I speake vnto you and that we haue preached vnto you says the Apostle but if it were granted vnto them what they cannot proue viz that Moyses then spoke what he had written afore notwithstanding they could not ouerthrow therby vnwritten traditions vnless they could proue which they can neuer doe that they be additions destructiue of or contrary to the written word of God for such additions only he meant and excluded by the cited scriptures and indeed if S. Paul had meant otherwise he should haue cursed S. Iohn the Euangelist that many yeares after his martyrdome writ reuelations which S. Paul had not preached to the Galatians likwise the Anathema had touched S. Paul himselfe that deliuered sundry passages in the acts of the Apostles which happened after his preaching to the Galatians Howeuer catholicks doe not deny but that traditions which are the vnwritten word be contained implicitly in the written word of God that is to say as in a generall principle from whence they are deducible and the whole word of God is contained in scriptutes yea in this sole Article of the Apostles Creed I belieue in the holy Catholick Church in as much as all the matters pertaining to faith and generall manners and not clearly expressed in holy scriptures are contained expresly in the doctrine of the Church which the scriptures commend vnto vs as infallible and indeed the whole word of God is expounded vnto vs in Christs command Math. 18. If he refuse to heare the Church let him be vnto thee as an heathen man and publican in regard wherof ancient Fathers do auerre all doctrines of faith to be contained in scriptures that is as in a generall principle from whence they can be deduced CHAR. XXJ. OF THE CHVRCH TRIVMPHANT THE CONTENTS Souls that remoue out of their earthly habitations cleansd from all vncleanes are instantly translated into Heauen the clear sight of God wherein consisteth heauenly beatitude is not deferd till the generall Resurrection though the office of mediation aduocation and intercession is proper to Christ alone as to the noblest manner therof neuertheless according to the Catholick Church all the Saints mediate and intercede in the sight of God for the faithfull on earth in subordination to Christ the Church of god does not nor neuer did teach that the faithfull on earth ought to mediate and intercede for the blessed in Heauen S. Paul did not mediate or intercede for Onesiphorus that he might obtaine mercy after his soule was beatifyed the ancient Liturgies of the Church approue not of prayers vnto helping of the blessed THe Church triumphant is a holy Congregation of blessed Saints reigning with Iesus-Christ innocēt souls not liable to any guilt of sin as soon (a) 2. Cor. 5. we know
the Idolatry of the Synagogue and the people her children After the like manner the Digbean Theology which is the product of Mr. Whites 40. yeares study to proue that outward sin doth not necessarily exclude charity from the souls nor that the soul is excluded from the kingdom of Heauen by outward sin make scripture giue an example therof Gen. 19. that is of the sweet agreement between the loue of God and outward sin in Lot and his daughters yet indeed no one place of holy scripture attestes that Lot and his daughters retained charity with their outward sin As touching Lot the holy writer seemes rather to excuse then accuse him in order to outward sin taken in the proper sense For t is expresly set down that his daughters made him drinke wine and lay with him but he perceiued not neither when they lay down neither when they rose so that lot might want knowledg of and thereby voluntary condescention to the fact and in consequence of which might not sin because sin properly taken importes of necessity (d) Sin of necessity includes a voluntary assent of the will which supposeth an act of the vnderstanding for as S Austin often inculcateth no man sinneth by doing a thing which he cannot auoid a voluntary act of the will for S. Austin teacheth that no man sinneth in a thing that he cannot * Hac propositio homo peccat damnabiliter in â—o quod necessario facit est damnata à Pio 5. Gregor 13. secundum Aug. eam asserere summae est iniquitatis ac demeÌ„tiae ait S. Hiero. vbi est necessitas ibi neque meritum neque demeritum neque laus neque vituperium neque vita aeterna neque damnatio auoid or eschew in regard wherof some of the ancient Fathers endeauour to absolue lot from all guilt albeit that the maior part and current of Catholick Doctors of these dayes doe ascribe vnto him the sin of drunkennes at least in the second bout and to his daughters the guilt of both for as much as they voluntarily procured the one and committed the other sin But as to Mr. whites assertion Author of the Digbean Theologie to witt If one should commit an outward deadly sin retaining a loue to God notwithstanding he might goe to Heauen which importes communion fellowship and a Iouing agreement between charity and outward sin a doctrine truly which hath been hid in darknes since the first age of christianity for 1660. yeares till the supream prouidence sent Mr. white to teach Christian schools that charity and deadly sin are not inconsistent together which he proues from the text set down thus God did bless the progeny that proceeded from Lot and his daughters therfore Lot and his daughters retained charity that is continued in holy society and freindshipp with God notwithstanding their externall sin of * Jn filiabus Lot propriè fuit peccatum incestus vt fusè probat Aug. l. 22. contrae faustum cuÌ„ ab illis fuerit causatum voluntariè incest but good God what a poore demonstratiue argument is this where the antecedent proposition is euidently false and the consequence suppose the antecedent were true very inconsequently deduced Falsity as to the antecedent plainly appeares for as that issue was born in horrible incest so was it and the posterity therof namely the Amonites and the Moabites vile and wicked * Aug. l. quaes in Deutro qu. 35. notat ab Abrahamo cuius frater erat Lot vsque ad Ruth quae prima ex Moabitis intrauit in Ecclesiam decem generationes inueniri in so much that euen to their tenth generation they did not enter into the Church of our Lord according to scripture testimony and the deduction is very inconsequent if the antecedent proposition were granted because the supream prouidence many times blesseth the children of wicked parents so that the diuine blessing bestowed vppon children is no infallible argument to demonstrate that their parents did adhere to God in charity and holy society at the time they got them For example God blessed the issue of Iudas and Thamar in a great measure Christ as man descending from it albeit that both were grieuous sinners in order to the bringing forth of the said issue for Iudas the Father voluntarily committed simple fornication and Thamar the mother the sin of incest But perhaps the student of 40. yeares standing will alledge that the antecedent afore mentioned That God did bless the progeny c. is meant of temporall blessings only and indeed it cannot be denyed but that the said progeny for example Moab the son of Lots elder daughter and Ammon son of the younger were heads of great nations the Moabites descending from the one and the Ammonites from the other yet this answer will auail him nothing at all as to the point of the present difficulty being it implieth manifest weaknes to infer from the worldly aduantages of Moab and Ammon that Lot and his daughters retained charity that is holy society with God in the outward sin of incest For God prospered the kings of Egypt many hundred yeares though they did not adhere vnto him in communion and holy society And S. Austin attesteth that God did extend the territories of the Roman Empire for the morall vertues practiced by the ancient Romans which notwithstanding were not endued with diuine charity Hereby plainly appeares that the holy scripture will not receiue into their sanctuary Mr. Whites Theology truly noe wonder for t is a doctrine destructiue of all morality and christian Religion in regard the excellent agreement that it setles between charity and externall sin must as it were of necessity induce fraile nature to commit outward sins of the flesh presuming that notwithstanding all outward vncleanes namely of drunkennes simple fornication adultery the loue retained to God shall bring a man so sinning outwardly to Heauen Besides it doth preiudice the Apostles Theology Neither drunkards nor fornicatours nor adulterers shall inherit the kingdom of Heauen Heb. 13 But perhaps it will be replyed that the Apostle excludes only such drunkards fornicatours and adulterers c. from the kingdom of Heauen as haue nothing of charity together with the sinns of drunkennes fornication and adultery so that though drunkards c. without charity cannot inherit the kingdom of God neuertheless charitable drunkards charitable fornicatours charitable adulterers charitable murderers shall not be excluded is this the Theology that 40. Yeares study hath brought forth But to returne vnto the matter in debate t is an article of Christian faith Trident. sess 6. can 15. can 27. that charity and deadly sin are incompatible and S. Iames the Apostle giueth euidence therof in the 2. Chapter of his canonicall Epistle saying Whosoeuer shall keep the whole law and yet offendeth in one he is guilty of all Because whosoeuer transgresseth one sole precept of the law is liable to eternall malediction enioyn'd by God to the
transgressors of it according to S. Hieroms interpretation l. 1. cap. 7. con Pelagia And that the sacred text set down speaketh of deadly sinns appear's euidently by the subsequent words for example the Apostle addeth He that said thon shalt not commit adultery said also thou shalt not kill which are deadly sinns and if thou dost none adultery but shalt kill thou art made a transgressour of the law Again no man is counted worthy eternall life and eternall death at once no man is God friend through charity and his enemy through deadly sin at the same time but euery morrall sin rendreth a man liable to euerlasting death Rom. 6. stipendia peccati mors The wages of sin is death contrarywise charity bringeth forth life and heauenly blessednes Ioan. 14. he that loueth me shall be loued of my Father and I will â—â—ue him and wilt shew my selfe to him in consequence of which as life and death so charity and mortall sin are inconsistent together neither matters it that diuine faith and diuine hope can abide in a soul desiled with deadly sin forthese two supernaturall vertues taken precisely import nothing of that vnion and friendship which is between the Creatour and the creature that being the proper product of charity neither matters it that a naturall habit is not lost by one sole contrary act though some learned Philosophers assert otherwise for there is nothing of parity between an habit naturally produced and an habit supernaturally infused vnto continuing and conseruing a naturall habit is not required that the acts that produced it continue also to the conseruing of it a man may for some tyme haue the enjoyment of a naturall habit without exercising any act at all but the conseruation of habituall charity necessarily depends of Gods speciall influence which is obstructed through deadly sin that rendereth a soul vnworthy of it CHAR. XXXIIJ OF ENVY THE CONTENTS An enuious man hath pleasure in euill and heauines in good things through enuy a man is made worse then deuills the daughter of enuy is detraction the property wherof is to report amiss and to aggrauate wicked aspersions the mouth of a detractour is a sepulcher of corruption who soeuer harkneth willingly to a detractour cooperateth to his sin ENuy is a killing plague man that God created without corruption the deuil through enuy brought to destruction * Sap. 2. inuidia diaboli mors introiuit in mundum death came into the world together with this infection and indeed men through enuy resemble deuills for as these wicked spirits so enuious men haue pleasure in euill and heauines in good things * Aug. inuidia est dolor alienae felicitatis inuidus de bono dolot de malo gaudet the prosperity that is not their own afflictes and the affliction of other men rejoyces them they be like the syrenes of the sea that lye hid in a calme mourning and exalt themselues in a storme singing while distressed mariners strugle with the raging waues vnto sauing their lifes they noe more endure the light of good works then owles the brightnes of the sun they haue in extream detestation such as exceed them in authority godlines dignity or wealth because they cannot equall them neither do they loue their inferiors lest they may come to be their equalls likwise they despise their equalls euen vpon the scoare of equallity The sonns of Iacob through enuy sould their brother Ioseph lest he might come to bear rule ouer them Gen. 39. Cain through enuy murdered his brother Abel Gen. 4. because he saw that God had a greater kindnes for him in regard his vertue and vprightnes had rendred him more amiable in the sight of his Creator king Saul though he coueted victories ouer his enimyes neuertheless he laid wait for Dauids blood vnto taking away his life because the glory of the batles won was ascribed * 1. Reg. percussit Saul mille Dauid decem millia Mihi dederunt mille aiebat Saul Dauid vero decem millia to the conduct and courage of Dauid wherby is plainly euidenced that enuy râ—ndreth man * S. Chrys hom 4. in Mat. inuidia reddit homines peiores diabolis NaÌ„ diabolus non vult nocere diabolâ— worse then deuils for deuils do not hurt deuils but men through enuy prejudice men which as to kind and nature are alike the enuious man sharpeneth his tongue as a serpent and adders poison is vnder his lips that is wicked detraction the innate property wherof is to report euill of others in their absence which is an impiety forebidden Leuit. 19. thou shalt not curse the deafe that is thou shalt not detract from the absent that cannotheare what is objected against him Again the naturall property of detraction is to augment or aggraâ—at euil reportes and to trauell after the hearing therof as a woman that is about to bring forth a child which is a wickednes forbidden Eccles 19. If shou hast heard a word against they neighbour let it dye with the furthermore the innate property of detraction is to darken the luster of good works though neuer so clear and manifest to extenuate their greatnes or steal away the right pertaining thereto wherby plainly appeares that a detractour is an abomination to God and the worst * S. Ambrâ— asserit tolerabiliores esse fures queÌ„ vespes alia bona nostra diripiuÌ„t quam fures qui famam nostram lacerant seed of theifes for example other robbers spoile and carrie away temporall goods onely namely gold siluer and garments wheras a detracter taketh away spirituall enjoyments that is our good name which is to be chosen aboue great riches Prouerb 22. and he that detracteth is * Bâ—siliuâ— coÌ„parat detractatorem muscae quae sanam carnem percutit vlceri incidit ibi figit rostruÌ„ like a fly that makes a would in whole flesh where none was afore sitteth on and fixeth its nib in it for a detracter striues to wound such as for innocency and purity of life shine without reproofe He is like a butchers dog that lyes wait for blood and hath his lips alwaies bloody for nothing of cleanes is in the mouth of a detracter whose throat is an open sepulcher of corruption he is like a spider that turneth sweet sauours into poison conuerting good into euill he is like a swine that entering into a garden where in one quarter are beds of sweet flowers and in another part therof dunghills hasteneth from the odoriferous plants to the stinking durt which is his pleasure for a detractour passeth ouer the flowry beds of vertues and hasteneth to dunghills that is to the sinns of other men wherin is the consistency of his delight in sum he is like * Eccles 10. qui famam alterius occultè laedit similis est serpeÌ„ti mordeâ—ti in sidentâ—o a serpent that windeth and turneth about craftely carrieth fair before and stingeth behind secretly for a detractour speakes
re shall hind vppon earth shall be bound in Heauen which is meant of ecclesiasticall Censures the greatest of which is excommunication Again Act. 15. when the new christians referred their controuersie concerning circumcision and other ceremonies of the law of Moyses to the Apostles at Ierusalem sentence of iudgment was declared by one accord thus It seemed good to the holy Ghost and to vs to lay no more burthen vpon you then these necessary things c. Wherby it is cleare that the Apostles then the representatiue Church were inuested with authority to make ordinances (c) It appeares plainly by the sacred text Act. Jt seems good to the holy Ghost and to vs to lay no more burden vpon you then these that the Apostles had authority to commande and exact obedience to their ordinances For the particles it seems good to vs to lay no more burden Shew euidently that they were superiours inuested with authority to commande and exact obedience from the people who were bound to obey them But here is obseruable that as to the matter in debate mentioned in the Chapter set down viz. whether the conuerted Gentils were obliged to obserue the law of Moyses S. Peter in that Council cald to determine it was supream Iudge for t' is written that after much dispute Peter rose vp and as head of all spoke first and decided the controuersy in fauour of the said conuerted Gentils deliuering them from the bondage of the old law and all the multitude saith S. Hierom Tom. 2. Epis 89. Augus cap. 2. kept silence and into Peters sentence or definition the Apostles S. Iames and all the Priests past with one accorde and euer since the Popes of Rome as S. Peters lawfull successors haue had precedence and the deciding suffrage in all Councils which are of credit and authoritie in the Church of God and to oblige the faithfull in the obseruation of them for the words It seemed good to vs to lay no more burden vpon you doe signify the authority of superiours to commande inferiours and the obligation of inferiours to obey their superiours Thirdly that the Church is liuing visible and speaking which is the third propriety of this Iudg is clearly expressed Act. 20. take heed to your selues and the flock wherof the holy Ghost hath made you Bishops to rule the Church of god which he hath purchased with his own blood and Again Math. 5. (d) According to S. Aug. trac in 1. epis Ioan. those are blind which cannot fee so great a mountaine and shut their eyes against the clear light put on a candlestick which is the Church of God the Church is stiled a Citty that is set on a mountaine which cannot be bid but no man can conceiue how Bishops can gouerne a Church which they see not or how a Citty set on a high mountaine can lie hid Besids all the Church offices ioynt and seperate do declare it visible liuing ad speaking neither matters it that the Church is known by faith which is of things not seen for the Apostles when they conuersed with Christ vpon earth they both saw and belieued him to be Christ As the Apostles saw Christ to be aman and belieued him to be God soe wee doe see the Church to be a congregation of men outwardly professing the faith of Christ and doe belieue that it is directed by the infallible assistance of the holy Ghost and as it cannot be euinced that a man is inuisible because an inuisible soul gouerneth him soe neither can it be euinced that the Church is inuisible because the supernaturall gifts of the holy Ghost namly faith hope and charitie wherby the Church is gouerned and men made children therof be inuisible From the premises is euidently deducible (e) S. Austin li. 10. de doct christ disputing against such as pretended to the knowledge of holy scriptures by speciall reuelations dissuades euery man from so proud and dangerous a tentation as to presume that he is taught of God and not of men and this caueat he vrgeth by many examples that the priuate spirit which is to say the particular reuealing spirit wherby as many sectaries conceiue euery priuate belieuer is enabled to interpret scriptures and iudge all matters concerning faith and religion hath no good claime to the office of this suprem Iudge beeing neither seen nor heard to speak clearly nor known certainly to be infallible in what it reuealeth to each particular belieuer in priuat for it may prudently be doubted whether it be a good spirit or not since false ministers can transforme themselues into Apostles of Christ and Satan himselfe into an Angel of light 2. Cor. 11. in consequence of which no wise and iudicious man can rely his eternity on such a priuat reuealing spirit Again God according to his ordinary way doth not immediatly himselfe reueale verities of faith to euery one in particular or iudge himselfe between party and party from the begining of the creation down to these times his prouidence hath ordained men to declare his ordinances vnto men appointed men to teach men and constituted men suprem Iudges of men for the determining of all hard matters in debate concerning faith and religion In the law of nature Abraham was made Teacher of men I know speaking of Abraham that he will command his son and family after him that they keepe the way of our lord Gen. 18. In the written law Moyses was constituted to teach the people of God the diuine ordinances and to shew vnto them the way wherein they were to walke and the worke they were to doe Exod. 18. and Deut. 17. the Priests of the Leuits were deputed supreme Iudges of controuersies which might rise about religion also Malac. 2. it is written the Priests lips shall preserue knowledg and they shall seek the law from his mouth In our new law of grace the Apostles were sent into diuers parts of the world to preach christian religion Mar. vltime Act. 8. God appointed Saint Philip to teach the Eunuch of Ethiopia Act. 9. Christ sent Saul to be instructed of Ananias and Act. 10. Cornelius the Centurion was admonished by an Angel to repaire vnto Saint Peter that he might learn of him matters of câ—ristian faith wherfore Saint Paul says Rom. 10. Faith is by heating and hearing by the word of God and how shall they heare without a preacher because ordinarily God teacheth men by men the verities of faith and Gal. 1. the same Apostle doubted not to prefer the doctrine he preached before the doctrine of an Angel from Heauen that should preach otherwise and truly if it were lawfull for euery man to follow and adhere to his own priuate spirit there would rise almost as many contrary religions as there are men liuing vpon the earth and consequently in room of that peace that Christ hath promised to the Church nothing but disorder and confusion would happen wherfore both in the old and new law this