the contrary thereof in any wise notwithstanding This Branch seems not to extend to all forfeitures for Recusancy For the power here given the Lord Treasurer To what cases of Conviction this Clause extends and to what not c. is only in relation to those forfeitures which are by this Act appointed to be paid into the Receipt of the Exchequer which are the forfeitures due to the Queen by Conviction upon Indictment for this Act meddles with no other so that if the twenty pounds per month be recovered in a popular Suit by the Informer Qui tam c. one third part thereof ought still to be paid to the Poor of the Parish only according to 23 Eliz. cap. 1. notwithstanding this Act. Provided always That this Act Stat. Sect. 9. Assurances made bona fide not to be impeached or any thing therein contained shall not in any wise extend or be construed to make void or impeach any Grant or Lease heretofore to be made bona fide without fraud or covin whereupon any yearly Rent or payment is reserved or payable or any Grant or Lease hereafter to be made bona fide without fraud or covin whereupon the accustomed yearly Rent or more shall be reserved or any other Conveyance Assurance or Assignment whatsoever heretofore made bona fide upon good consideration and without fraud or covin which is not or shall not be revokable at the pleasure of such Offender otherwise then to give benefit and title to her Majesty her Heirs and Successors to have perceive and enjoy such Rents and Payments during the continuance of such Lease or Grant according to the true meaning of this Act. Seizure of Lands whereof the Offender hath but an Estate for life or in his Wives right And provided also That this Act or any thing therein contained shall not in any wise extend or be construed to continue any seizure of any Lands or Tenements of such Offender in her Majesties hands or in the hands of her Heirs or Successors after the said Offenders death which Lands or Tenements he shall have or be seized of only for term of his life or in the Right of his Wife Any thing in this Act to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Stat. xxxv Eliz. cap. i. An Act to retain the Queens Majesties Subjects in their due Obedience FOR preventing and avoiding of such great inconveniencies and perils as might happen and grow by the wicked and dangerous practices of seditious Sectaries and disloyal persons Stat. Sect. 1. The penalty of a Recusant perswading others to impugne the Queens Ecclesiastical power Be it Enacted by the Queéns most Excellent Majesty and by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same That if any person or persons above the age of sixteen years which shall obstinately refuse to repair to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer to hear Divine Service established by her Majesties Laws and Statutes in that behalf made and shall forbear to do the same by the space of a month next after without any lawful cause shall at any time after forty days next after the end of this Session of Parliament by Printing Writing or express words or speéches advisedly or purposely practise or go about to move or perswade any of her Majesties Subjects or any other within her Highness Realms or Dominions to deny withstand and impugne her Majesties Power and Authority in cases Ecclesiastical united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm or to that end or purpose shall advisedly and maliciously move or perswade any other person whatsoever to forbear or abstain from coming to Church to hear Divine Service Or to forbear coming to Church or to receive the Communion according to her Majesties Laws and Statutes aforesaid or to come to or to be present at any unlawful Assemblies Conventicles or Meétings under colour or pretence of any exercise of Religion Or to be present at unlawful Conventicles contrary to her Majesties said Laws and Statutes Or if any person or persons which shall obstinately refuse to repair to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer and shall forbear by the space of a month to hear Divine Service as is aforesaid shall after the said forty days either of him or themselves or by the motion perswasion inticement or allurement of any other willingly joyn in or be present at any such Assemblies Conventicles or Méetings under colour or pretence of any such exercise of Religion contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm as is aforesaid That then every such person so offending as aforesaid and being thereof lawfully convicted shall be committed to Prison there to remain without Bail or Mainprize until they shall conform and yield themselves to come to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer and hear Divine Service according to her Majesties Laws and Statutes aforesaid and to make such open submission and Declaration of their said Conformity as hereafter in this Act is declared and appointed Which shall obstinately refuse to repair c. shall c. by Printing c. Wingate in abridging of this Statute tit Crowne numb 70. saith that if any person above sixteen years of age obstinately refuses to come to Church for a month or impugnes the Queens Authority in Causes Ecclesiastical he shall be committed to Prison which is a great mistake for no man shall be punished by this Act for either of those Causes only The not coming to Church being only a precedent Qualification required in the person whom the Act makes liable to the penalties thereof for the other offences therein mentioned Who may be an offender within this Act and who not And therefore if a man never comes to Church yet he is no offender within this Act unless he advisedly or purposely move or perswade another to deny or impugne the Kings Authority in Causes Ecclesiastical or to that end or purpose advisedly and maliciously move or perswade some other to forbear to come to Church or receive the Communion or to be present at Conventicles c. or he himself be present at such Conventicles c. And on the other hand if a man move or perswade any other to deny or impugne the Kings Authority in Causes Ecclesiastical or to forbear to come to Church or receive the Communion or to be present at Conventicles c. or if he himself be present at any Conventicles c. yet he is no Offender within this Act if he goes to Church once within the compass of a month so that the party must both forbear to come to Church and be guilty of some other of the offences here enumerated or he is not punishable by this Act And as for the denying or impugning the Kings Authority in Causes Ecclesiastical it s no offence within this Statute unless the party moves or
Verdict pass against him these are Convictions in Law but yet by these Convictions he forfeits nothing until Judgment nor shall the penalty of 20 l. per month run on or be appropriated to the King until Judgment be given By Convicted therefore is here to be understood convicted by Proclamation and Default or convicted by Verdict Confession c. and adjudged for so the word is here to be taken viz. for adjudged or attainted unless it be in Case of Conviction upon Proclamation And in such a sense it is to be taken in divers other Cases Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 5. When the 20 l per month is to be paid In such of the Terms of Easter or Michaelmas That is the Term of Easter or Michaelmas which shall first happen and not the next Easter and Michaelmas Terms both For the Recusant ought to pay the whole penalty for the time contained in the Indictment in the very first of those Terms next after his Conviction See for this Stat. 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 3 Jac. 4. Sect. 6. From what time the said penalty shall run on Stat. 23 Eliz. 1. 3 Jac. 4. For every month after such Conviction For what time the penalty of 20 l. per month shall run on after the Recusant is indicted and convicted and in what Cases the Informer and all others but the King shall be barred after such Conviction Vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. antea Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 6. postea Office Take seize and enjoy But as to Lands and Tenements there must first be an Office found for the King for regularly before the finding of such Office Lands or Tenements cannot be seized into the Kings hands Co. 2. Inst 573. Co. 8. 169. Paris Stoughters Case Bro. tit Office 17. 55. Plowden 486. Nicholls Case By this Statute the Queen was to have and enjoy two parts of the Recusants Lands and Hereditaments nomine poenae or districtionis The two parts not satisfactory of the twenty pounds per month until he had in some other manner satisfied her of the whole forfeiture of the Twenty pounds per month incurred for his Recusancy And the profits of those two parts should not have been accompted to go to the payment of any part of the said debt or forfeiture For the Statute inflicted this forfeiture upon him meerly as a farther penalty for his neglect of payment of the Twenty pounds per month as was resolved by the two Chief Justices and Chief Baron Trin. 43 Eliz. in Gages Case Cro. Eliz. 845. 846. and by all the Judges The Law now altered in that point 3 Jac. at Russell House Jones 24. Standen versus Vniversity d'Oxon Whitton But now the Law is altered in this point by the Statute of 1 Jac. cap. 4. Vide the Stat. infra Sect. 4. Stat. 1 Jac. 4 All the goods A Recusant is Indicted and Convicted Recusants goods when forfeited and then fails of payment of the Twenty pounds per month yet his goods are not forfeited to the King by this Statute before seizure For the King hath his Election whether he will seize them or no. By Coke Chief Justice B. R. 12. Jac. Rolles 1. 7. C. 8. Cullom versus Sherman A Recusant lends money Recognizance forfeited and for security hath a Rent-charge granted him in Fee by Deed indented with condition of redemption and takes likewise a Recognizance for performance of Covenants in the said Indenture The Recognizance is forfeited and afterwards he is Indicted and Convicted of Recusancy and fails of payment of the Twenty pounds per month In this case the King shall have the Recognizance by force of this Act for when forfeited to the Recusant it is but a chattel personal What is given to the King by this word Goods and shall pass to the King by this word goods For in an Act of Parliament where the Offenders goods are given to the King all debts and personal Chattels and Actions are thereby given him as well as goods in possession And here in this Act as take and seize refer to two parts of the Recusants Lands and Tenements so enjoy refers to goods And the King shall enjoy the debt due by the Recognizance Nor doth it alter the Case for that the Recognizance was acknowledged for performance of Covenants in an Indenture concerning a Rent-charge in fee which seems to savour of the realty for it was originally for the loan and forbearance of money which is personal Co. 12. 1. 2. Ford and Sheldons Case If a man who is a Recusant take such a Recognizance in the name of another Recognizance taken in anothers name forfeited the King upon his Conviction shall have the Recognizance for when the Recusant was such at the time of taking the Recognizance and so continued until the time of his Conviction it shall be intended that it was done by Covin and that he took it in the name of another with an intent to prevent the King of the levying of the forfeiture and such Covin shall not bar the King Co. 12. 2. 3. the same Case The Kings grant If a Recognizance or Obligation be forfeited to the King by force of this Act he may grant it over as he may any other Chattel in Action under his private Seal Rolles 1. 7. C. 8. Cullom versus Sherman Hereditaments Rent Advowson in gross Hereditaments A Rent of Inheritance and an Advowson in gross are comprehended under this word But whether the King may seize such an Advowson as part of his two parts and present by vertue thereof since the Stat. of 3 Jac. c. 5. which gives the Presentation to the Universities Stat. 3 Jac. 5 Vide that Stat. infra Sect. 19. All other the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments liable to such seisure or to the penalties aforesaid It hath been much disputed whether Copyhold Lands are within this Branch of the Statute Copyhold Lands if seizable for regularly in Acts of Parliament which are Enacted for forfeiture of Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Copyholds shall not be forfeited but only Lands Tenements and Hereditaments which are such at the Common Law and not those which are such by custom only as Copyholds are And it was agreed in Heydons Case Co. 3. 8. That where an Act of Parliament alters the service or tenure or other thing in prejudice of the Lord there general words in the Act shall not extend to Copyholds Vide Savile 67. C. 138. And if the King should seize them by force of the general words here viz. Lands Tenements and Hereditaments the Lord would during the time they are in the Kings hands lose his Seigniory Customs and Services But yet it was held by Manwood Chief Baron and Baron Clark in the Case of Sulherd and Everet Mich. 30 Eliz. That Copyholds are within this Act and although Manwood seemed to grant that they are not within
publick and open Submission and Declaration of his and their Conformity to her Majesties Laws and Statutes as hereafter in this Act is declared and appointed That then the same Offender shall thereupon be clearly discharged of and from all and every the penalties and punishments inflicted or imposed by this Act for any of the Offences aforesaid The former part of this Statute appoints the Conformity and Submission to be at any Church Submission where to b◠made Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer but this limits it to be at some Parish Church the meaning whereof seems to be That if a man be an Offender against this Act and convicted he may within the three months after his Conviction conform and submit in any Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer where there is Common Prayer and either a Sermon or the Gospel read But if he be required within the three months to Conform and make Submission and he refuses so to do but the three months expire then his Conformity and Submission must be more solemn and publick viz. in some Parish Church where it is presumed there will be the greatest number of People to be Witnesses thereof And by this construction the seeming difference between these two branches of the Statute one whereof limits the Offender to a Parish Church and the other leaves him at large to any Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer is reconciled And this construction naturally flows from the Order wherein these two branches are placed For the Statute speaks of a Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer before it mentions the parties refusal to conform and submit within three months next after Conviction But when it hath mentioned such refusal then it speaks of the Parish Church only And the second time here limited to the Offender when he may conform and submit viz. before he be warned or required to abjure presupposes his refusal to conform and submit within the three months For otherwise he could not be required to abjure But if the Offender be not required within the three months according to this Act to conform and submit it seems he is not afterwards limited to some Parish Church but may do it according to the former branch of this Act in any Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer for he is then in no danger of Abjuration and his Conformity and Submission is then to no other end but to free himself from the Imprisonment inflicted on him upon his Conviction And in that Case the Act saith he may conform and submit in any Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer Of this difference between the places of Conformity and Submission no notice is taken in the late Additions to Dalton but any Church or Chappel is made to serve the turn in all Cases cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 13. What is a Parish Church By Parish Church is to be understood not only that which hath been always the Mother Church and never belonged to any other but every Church which hath the Administration of Sacraments and Sepulture For that in Law is a Parish Church although it anciently belonged to another Church Co. 2. Inst. 363. where the issue was whether it had Baptisterium Sepulturam And the Church of Stoke Goldenham though the Town was parcel of the Rectory of Hinckley whose Church was anciently the Mother Church yet having all Parochial Rights and Church-wardens was adjudged a Parish Church and within the meaning of the Statute of 43 Eliz. cap. 2. of the Poor Hutton 93. Hilton and Paules Case Stat. Sect. 5. The same Submission to be as hereafter followeth that is to say The form of the Submission I A. B. do humbly confess and acknowledge that I have grievously offended God in contemning her Majesties godly and lawful Government and Authority by absenting my self from Church and from hearing Divine Service contrary to the Godly Laws and Statutes of this Realm and in using and frequenting disordered and unlawful Conventicles and Assemblies under pretence and colour of Exercise of Religion And I am heartily sorry for the same and do acknowledge and testifie in my Conscience that no other person hath or ought to have any Power or Authority over her Majesty And I do promise and protest without any dissimulation or any colour or means of any Dispensation That from henceforth I will from time to time obey and perform her Majesties Laws and Statutes in repairing to the Church and hearing Divine Service and do my uttermost endeavour to maintain and defend the same Or any colour or means of any Dispensation Dispensation These words are omitted by Wingate tit Crown numb 72. And the form there set down faulty in several other particulars and not to be relied upon Her Majesties Laws and Statutes The Queens Laws Stat. 27 Eliz. 2. What is meant by her Majesties Laws Vide Stat. 27 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 7. And that every Minister or Curate of every Parish where such Submission and Declaration of Conformity shall hereafter be so made by any such Offender as aforesaid Stat. Sect. 6. The Minister shall enter the Submission into a Book shall presently enter the same into a Book to be kept in every Parish for that purpose and within ten days next following shall certifie the same in writing to the Bishop of the same Diocess Provided nevertheless The Offender submitting and falling into Relapse That if any such Offender after such Submission made as is aforesaid shall fall into Relapse or eftsoons obstinately refuse to repair to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer to hear Divine Service and shall forbear the same as aforesaid or shall come or be present at any such Assemblies Conventicles or Méetings under colour or pretence of any exercise of Religion contrary to her Majesties Laws and Statutes That then every such Offender shall lose all such benefit as he or she might otherwise by virtue of this Act have or enjoy by reason of their said Submission And shall thereupon stand and remain in such plight condition and degrée to all intents as though such Submission had never beén made And for that every person having House and Family Stat. Sect. 7. The forfeiture for relieving or keeping a Recusant after notice Rep. 3 Jac. 4. is in duty bounden to have special regard to the good Government and ordering of the same Be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any person or persons shall at any time hereafter relieve maintain retain or keép in his or their House or otherwise any person which shall obstinately refuse to come to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer to hear Divine Service and shall forbear the same by the space of a mouth together contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm That then every person which shall so relieve maintain retain or keép any such person offending
mentioned in this Act but that the heir of every such Offender by force of this Act shall and may after the death of every Offender have and enjoy the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments of such Offender as if this Act had not beén made Every Abjuration Abjuration as well as that for Felony is an Exile or Banishment and if perpetual and by Authority of Parliament amounts to a civil death and therefore the Wife of a Man banished or abjured forever might sue or be sued without her Husband Suit as was ruled in the Case of the Lady Maltravers 10 E. 3. and of the Lady Belknap 1 H. 4. 1. 2 H. 4. 7. And if a man be perpetually banished by Authority of Parliament unless is be for Felony or by force of this Act his Wife shall be endowed living the Husband And if he had been perpetually banished or abjured for Felony the Wife should have had her joynture Jointure presently although not her Dower Dower as was resolved in Weylands Case 19 E. 1. and the reason is because though the Husband be naturally living yet he is civilly and in the Eye of the Law as a dead man But yet these Cases are to be understood of a Banishment or abjuration forever and not of a Relegation or Exile for a time For in such Case neither could the Wife sue or be sued without her Husband nor could she have her Dower or Joynture during the natural life of her Husband Co. 1. Inst 132. 133. Co. 2. Inst 47. Bulstrode 3. 188. Rolles 1. 400. C. 27. Wilmores Case Moore 851. C. 1159. Wilmots Case But if a man be abjured by force of this Act What dower is here saved the Wife shall not have her Dower or Joynture during the natural life of her Husband although he be abjured forever but she is in worse Case then the Wife of a person perpetually banished was at the Common Law For this Act by express words gives his Lands Tenements and Hereditaments to the Queen during his life which is to be understood of his natural life And the saving here of the Wives Dower is not intended of the Dower which she might claim at Common Law presently upon the abjuration of her Husband nor shall make void the former words of the Act by which all his Lands are given to the Queen during his natural life but is only the usual Provision made in Acts of Parliament which create any new Felony for the saving of the Dower of the Wife after the death of the Husband So that the meaning of this Branch is that if the Husband refuse to abjure or abjure and refuse to depart according to this Act or return without lieence yet the Wife shall be endowed and the heir inherit his Lands after he is naturally dead And this Act to continue no longer than to the end of the next Session of Parliament Stat. Sect. 12. Note this Act being at first but temporary This Act at first but temporary was afterwards discontinued Hutton 61. 62. but is since revived by the Statute of 3 Car. 1. c. 4. and is in full force at this day And in such Case it hath been questioned if a Statute be discontinued and afterwards revived how an Indictment thereupon shall conclude whether contra formam Statuti or Statutorum Where if a Statute be discontinued and revived it shall be contra formam Statuti and where contra formam Statutorum For if a Statute be temporary and afterwards continued for a longer time or made perpetual and never discontinued there without doubt it shall be contra formam Statuti but it hath been held by some that where it was once discontinued and then revived there it is as if there were two several and distinct Statutes and the Indictment shall conclude contra formam Statutorum Palmers Case 9 Eliz. But others have held the contrary and that there is not any difference in the Case of a Statute at first temporary and afterwards before any discontinuance continued for a longer time or made perpetual and a Statute discontinued and then revived but that it shall in both Cases be held but as one Statute and the conclusion shall be contra formam Statuti and not Statutorum unless where the Act of Reviver makes any addition to the former Act or increaseth the penalty or forfeiture For then there is no doubt but they are two distinct Acts of Parliament And according to this later opinion hath the practice been in Informations upon the Statute of 5 Eliz. cap. 9. of Perjury Stat. 5 Eliz. 9 which determined 14 Eliz. and was revived 29 Eliz. And yet all Informations thereupon conclude Contra formam Statuti And so as it seems ought all Indictments upon this Statute of 35. notwithstanding its discontinuance and reviver Vide Owen 135. Wests Case Stat. xxxv Eliz. cap. ii An Act for the restraining of Popish Recusants to some certain place of abode FOr the better discovering and avoiding of such Traiterous and most dangerous Conspiracies and Attempts as are daily devised and practiced against our most gracious Soveraign Lady the Queéns Majesty Stat. Sect. 1. and the happy estate of this Common-weal by sundry wicked and seditious persons who terming themselves Catholicks and being indéed spies and intelligencers not only for her Majesties forreign Enemies but also for Rebellious and Traiterous Subjects born within her Highness Realms and Dominions and hiding their most detestable and divellish purposes under a false pretext of Religion and Conscience do secretly wander and shift from place to place within this Realm to corrupt and seduce her Majesties Subjects and to stir them to Sedition and Rebellion Be it Ordained and Enacted by our Soveraign Lady the Quéens Majesty and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal A Popish Recusant convicted and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same That every person above the age of sixtéen years born within any of the Quéens Majesties Realms and Dominions or made Denizen being a Popish Recusant and before the end of this Session of Parliament convicted for not repairing to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer to hear Divine Service there but forbearing the same contrary to the tenor of the Laws and Statutes heretofore made and provided in that behalf and having any certain place of dwelling and abode within this Realm shall within forty days next after the end of this Session of Parliament if they be within this Realm and not restrained or stayed either by Imprisonment or by her Majesties Commandment or by order or direction of some six or more of the Privy Council or by such sickness and infirmity of body as they shall not be able to Travel without imminent danger of Life and in such Cases of absence out of the Realm restraint or stay then within 20 days next after they shall return into the Realm and be
taken in only such as are convicted it would have been eluded and rendred ineffectual for want of a Conviction of the greater part of such ubiquitary Recusants The want of due consideration of this Statute in each of these parts of it hath occasioned some mistakes in those who have handled it And Wingate tit Crown numb 78. restrains both parts of it as well relating to those that have no certain place of abode as those whose place of abode is certain to Recusants convicted and makes no mention that this later sort must be in England at the time of their Conviction And in the late Additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 14. 't is not only said that both sorts must be convicted but that they must be in England at the time of their Conviction which two things are only requisite in such who have a certain place of abode and not in the other sort who are within the meaning and danger of this Law without any precedent Conviction for Recusancy See more of this matter Licence to Travel Stat. 3 Jac. 5. and how a Popish Recusant shall be licensed to Travel out of his compass of five miles Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 5. Sect. 8. And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 4. A Popish Recusant Copy-holder That every such Offender as is before mentioned which hath or shall have any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments by Copy of Court Roll or by any other customary tenure at the will of the Lord according to the Custom of any Mannor shall forfeit all and singular his and their said Lands Tenements and Hereditaments so holden by Copy of Court Roll or customary tenure as aforesaid for and during the life of such offender if his or her Estate so long continue to the Lord or Lords of whom the same be immediately holden if the same Lord or Lord or Lords be not then a Popish Recusant and convicted for not coming to Church to hear Divine Service but forbearing the same contrary to the Laws and Statutes aforesaid nor seized or possessed upon Trust to the use or behoof of any such Recusant as aforesaid And in such Case the same forfeiture to be to the Quéens Majesty Provided always Stat. Sect. 5. Popish Recusants shall notifie their coming and deliver in their names and be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all such persons as by the intent and true meaning of this Act are to make their repair to their place of dwelling and abode or to the place where they were born or where their Father or Mother shall be dwelling and not to remove or pass above five miles from thence as is aforesaid shall within twenty days next after their coming to any of the said places as the Case shall happen notifie their coming thither and present themselves and deliver their true names in writing to the Minister or Curate of the same Parish and to the Constable Headborough or Tithingman of the Town and thereupon the said Minister or Curate shall presently enter the same into a Book to be kept in every Parish for that purpose Which shall be certified to the Sessâ—ons and enrolled there And afterwards the said Minister or Curate and the said Constable Headborough or Tithingman shall certifie the same in writing to the Iustices of the Peace of the same County at the next general or Quarter Sessions to be holden in the same County and the said Iustices shall cause the same to be entred by the Clerk of the Peace in the Rolls of the same Sessions Goods and Lands where not forfeited A Popish Recusant repairs to the place appointed him by this Act and keeps within his compass of five miles but doth not present himself or deliver in his name he doth not forfeit his Goods or Lands For there is no particular penalty inflicted in this part of the Act for that omission nor yet in the subsequent Branch for him that hath clearly twenty marks per annum in Freehold or Goods and Chattels worth forty pounds But yet such person may be Indicted for such neglect and fined upon the general words of the Statute which commands the thing to be done For where an Act of Parliament commands any thing to be done and inflicts no penalty an Indictment lies against the person who ought to do it for his neglect or omission Co. 2. Inst. 55. 163. Vide Cro. Hill 41 Eliz. 655. Crouthers Case Stat. Sect. 6. The penalty of a Popish Recusant of small ability offending against this Act. And to the end that the Realm be not pestered and overcharged with the multitude of such Seditious and dangerous people as is aforesaid who having little or no ability to answer or satisfie any competent penalty for their contempt and disobedience of the said Laws and Statutes and being committed to Prison for the same do live for the most part in better Case there then they could if they were abroad at their own liberty The Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament Assembled do most humbly and instantly beséech the Quéens Majesty that it may be further Enacted That if any such person or persons being a Popish Recusant not being a Feme Covert and not having Lands Tenements Rents or Annuities of an absolute Estate of Inheritance or freehold of the clear yearly value of twenty marks above all charges to their own use and behoof and not upon any secret trust or confidence for any other or Goods and Chattels in their own right and to their own proper use and behoof And not upon any such secret trust and confidence for any other above the value of forty pounds shall not within the time before in this Act in that behalf limited and appointed repair to their place of usual dwelling and aboad if they have any or else to the place where they were born or where their Father or Mother shall be dwelling according to the tenor and intent of this present Act And thereupon notifie their coming and present themselves and deliver their true Names in writing to the Minister or Curate of the Parish and to the Constable Headborough or Tithingman of the Town within such time and in such manner and form as is aforesaid or at any time after such their repairing to any such place as is before appointed shall pass or remove above five miles from the same And shall not within three months next after such person shall be apprehended or taken for offending as is aforesaid conform themselves to the obedience of the Laws and Statutes of this Realm in coming usually to the Church to hear Divine Service and in making such publick Confession and Submission as hereafter in this Act is appointed and expressed being thereunto required by the Bishop of the Diocess or any Iustice of the Peace of the County where the same person shall happen to be or by the Minister or
be a Popish Recusant convict at any time after his or her conviction shall exercise any publick Office or Charge in the Commonwealth but shall be utterly disabled to exercise the same by himself or by his Deputy except such Husband himself and his Children which shall be above the age of nine years abiding with him and his Servants in houshold shall once every month at the least not having any reasonable excuse to the contrary repair to some Church or Chappel usual for Divine Service and there hear Divine Service And the said Husband and such his Children and Servants as are of méet age receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper at such times as are limited by the Laws of this Realm and do bring up his said Children in true Religion This Clause extends not to all sorts of Recusants who are convicted or have Wives who are Recusants convicted as is mistaken in the late additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 46. To whom this clause extends But at this day only to the Popish Recusant convicted or having a Wife who is a Popish Recusant convicted To whom not A Popish Recusant not convicted hath a Wife who is convicted of Recusancy but is no Popish Recusant The Husband is not disabled by this Statute to exercise any publick Office or Charge for that neither the Husband is a convicted Recusant nor the Wife a Popish Recusant A person who is convicted of Recusancy but is no Popish Recusant hath a Wife who is a Popish Recusant but not convicted The Husband is out of this Branch of the Statute for that neither the Husband is a Popish Recusant nor the Wife convicted Stat. Sect. 11. A Married Woman being a Popish Recusant And be it also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That every Married Woman being or that shall be a Popish Recusant convict her Husband not standing convicted of Popish Recusancy which shall not conform her self and remain conformed but shall forbear to repair to some Church or usual place of Common Prayer and there to hear Divine Service and Sermon if any then be and within the said year receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper according to the Laws of this Realm by the space of one whole year next before the death of her said Husband shall forfeit and loose to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors the issues and profits of two parts of her Ioynture and two parts of her Dower in thrée parts to be divided during her life of or out of any the Lands Tenements or Hereditaments which are or were her said Husbands and also be disabled to be Executrix or Administratrix of her said Husband and to have or demand any part or portion of her said late Husbands Goods or Chattels by any Law custom or usage whatsoever The issues and profits of two parts of her Ioynture and two parts of her Dower A Woman may have Joynture and Dower both And not of two parts of her Joynture or Dower as Wingate tit Crown numb 134. For there are divers Cases where notwithstanding the Statute of 27 H. 8. cap. 10. the Wife shall have her Dower and Joynture both And forfeit two parts of both And if she offend against this branch she shall forfeit the profits of two parts of both And that not only where the Joynture made to her is not warranted by that Statute but in some Cases where the Joynture is pursuant and according to the Statute she shall have her Dower and Joynture both Of the first sort are these Where the Joynture is not warranted by Stat. 27 H. 8. 10. If an Estate be made of Lands to the Wife for the life of another Co. 4. 3. Vernons Case Or for a thousand years or for a thousand years if she live so long Co. 1. Inst 36. Or if a Rent be granted to the Wife for the life of another or for years or any other way not pursuant to that Statute Vide Anderson 1. 288. c. 296. Bickley's Case Anderson 2. 30 31. c. 20. Wentworths Case Or if an Estate be made to others in fee or for the Wives life upon Trust for her benefit Co. 1. Inst 36. Or if a man Covenant to stand seized to the use of himself in Tail the Remainder to the use of his Wife for life Pasch 16. Jac. B. R. Woods Case Or if the Husband make a Feoffment in see to the use of himself for life the remainder to another for life or years the remainder to the Wife for her life Co. 4. 2. 3. Hutton 51. Sherwells Case In all these Cases although the Lands or Rent were conveyed to the Wife for her Joynture yet the Estate not being within the Statute of 27 H. 8. her acceptance thereof shall not bar her Dower but she shall have such Joynture and her Dower also And the reason why in the two last Cases the Wife shall not be barred of her Dower although there be an Estate limited to her for her life is because the Estate is not in its first Creation appointed to take immediately after the death of the Husband And no matter which arises ex post facto can salve this or make it a Joynture within that Statute to bar her Dower And therefore if in the first of those two Cases the Husband Tenant in Tail dies without issue or if in the last Case he in the remainder die before the Husband or the term for years determines in the Husbands life time so that the Wife may enter presently after his death yet because the Estate to the Wife for her life was not originally limited to take immediately after his death it shall not bar her Dower For quod ab initio non valet in tractu temporis non convalescet Co. 4. 2 3. Hutton 51. And as in all the Cases before mentioned if the Estate were made for her Joynture the Wife shall have such Joynture and her Dower both so if she be an Offender within this branch of the Act and conform not within the year next before her Husbands death she shall forfeit the profits of two parts of both Of what Lands she shall not forfeit the profits But otherwise it is where an Estate is given or limited by the Husband to the Wife and it s neither expressed nor can be averred and proved to be given or limited for her Joynture or in recompence of her Dower And therefore if any of the Estates before mentioned which are not within the Statute of 27 H. 8. be granted or limited to the Wife by the Husband or any other Estate for her life or otherwise which would be a good Joynture within the said Statute if it were intended for a Joynture as if a man before or after Marriage Covenants to stand seized of Lands to the use of himself for life the Remainder to his Wife for her life and it is neither expressed in the Deed nor can be averred and
proved that it was for her Joynture or if a man devise Lands by his last Will to his Wife generally and there is no mention in the Will that 't is for her Joynture for in this Case an Averment that it was so intended will not serve unless there be express words in the Will to that purpose These Estates so gained by the Wife as they do not bar her Dower out of the residue of her Husbands Estate but that she shall enjoy both the one and the other Co. 4. 4. so they are not within the meaning of this Act because not made for her Joynture And she shall not forfeit the profits of two parts of them although she may forfeit the profits of 2 parts of her Dower which she hath out of the residue of her Husbands Estate If Lands be conveyed to the Wife before marriage for part of her Joynture and other Lands are conveyed to her after Marriage in full satisfaction of her Jointure and she refuse those conveyed after Marriage in this Case she may retain those conveyed before Marriage and yet be endowed of the residue of her Husbands Estate For that the Lands first setled on her were not for her whole Joynture Co. 1. Inst 35. Co. 4. 3. Forfeiture of the profits of part of her Jointure And if she be a Popish Recusant Convict and her Husband none and she conform not within the year next before his death she shall forfeit the profits of two parts both of such Dower and of the Estate so conveyed to her before her Marriage And as the Wife shall have her Joynture and Dower both Where the Jointure is pursuant to the Statute in such Cases where the Joynture is not pursuant to the Statute of 27 H. 8. so in some Cases likewise where she hath a Joynture pursuant to that Statute As where she hath such a Joynture made to her by the Husband before Marriage and he afterwards endow her ad ostium Ecclesiae or if she hath a Joynture made by the Husband in his life time and after his death his Heir or Feoffee assign other Lands to her in Dower or the Heir plead to her in a Writ of Dower ne unque seisi que Dower c. or nient accouple in Loyal Matrimony or any other Plea save Joynture in bar of Dower and it be found against him In these Cases the Wife shall hold her Joynture and yet be endowed and if she be an Offender within this branch of the Act shall forfeit the profits of two parts of her Joynture and Dower both But if a Widow Dower not forfeited who is indowed of the Lands of her deceased Husband takes a second Husband who is no Popish Recusant Convicted by whom she hath a Jointure and she becomes a Popish Recusant Convict and the second Husband dies and the Wife is an Offender within this Act In this Case she shall not by force thereof forfeit the profits of two parts of such Dower and Jointure both but only of her Jointure For that her Dower is not out of the Lands of her said Husband that is of the Husband in whose life time she stood convicted and after such Conviction forbore to conform c. within the year next before his death And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 12. A Popish Recusant shall be disabled as an Excommunicate person That every Popish Recusant which is or shall be convicted of Popish Recusancy shall stand and be reputed to all intents and purposes disabled as a person lawfully and duly Excommunicated and as if he or she had béen so denounced and excommunicated according to the Laws of this Realm until he or she so disabled shall conform him or her self and come to Church and hear Divine Service and receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper according to the Laws of this Realm and also take the Oath appointed and prescribed in one other Act made this present Session of Parliament Intituled An Act for the better discovering and repressing of Popish Recusants And that every person or persons sued or to be sued by such person so disabled shall and may plead the same in disabling of such Plaintiff as if he or she were Excommunicated by Sentence in the Ecclesiastical Court What Conviction disables him Convicted of Popish Recusancy The Conviction mentioned here and in the other branches of this Statute seems to be intended not only of a Conviction according to the Statute of 29 Eliz. 6. or 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 29 Eliz. 6. 3 Jac. 4. upon Proclamation and default of appearance but of a Judgment likewise upon an Indictment or popular Suit on the Statute of 23 Eliz. 1. or an Action of Debt c. by the King alone by force of the Statute of 35 Eliz. 1. 35 Eliz. 1. For Convicted in relation to these three last mentioned remedies is to be taken for adjudged or attainted Vide for this the Statute of 23 Eliz. 1. Sect. 5. And the Popish Recusant who is either convicted upon Proclamation and default of appearance or against whom Judgment is had upon an Indictment popular Suit or Action of Debt c. at the Kings Suit is hereby disabled as an Excommunicate person and liable to all other the penalties and incapacities inflicted by this Act on a Popish Recusant convicted To what intent as excommunicate Reputed to all intents and purposes disabled as a person c. Excommunicated And not reputed to all intents as an Excommunicate person as Wingate tit Crown numb 135. misrecites the Statute For as it seems by the words of the Statute the Popish Recusant convicted is not to be reputed as a person Excommunicate in any other respect or to any other intent but as to his disability only And yet the Opinion of the Court of Kings Bench Mich. 11 Jac. in the Case of Griffith and others seems to be to the contrary and that a Popish Recusant convicted may by force hereof be attached upon a Writ of Excommunicato capiendo Excommmnicato capiendo Bulstrode 2. 155. Tamen Quaere whether this Statute being a penal Law and speaking only of the point of disability shall be extended by Equity to other Cases or the Recusant be attached upon an Excommunicato capiendo unless he be first actually Excommunicated A Popish Recusant Convict is disabled as an Excommunicate person Witness to be a Witness in any Cause between party and party By Coke Chief Justice Bulstrode 2. 155. This disability but quousque May plead the same in disabling of such Plaintiff This disability in the Popish Recusant convicted is but quousque c. until he Conform c. and take the Oath of Allegiance And the Defendant must in this Case plead the Conviction at large and must as in a Plea of Excommengement demand if the Plaintiff shall be answered Hetley 18. which is the legal conclusion of a Plea in disability of
which the King hath already done or in respect of what the Recusant after his conviction hath omitted to do And therefore if a man be convicted of recusancy upon a popular Suit or an Action of Debt at the Kings Suit alone in which Cases the penalty of Twenty pounds per month is not appropriated to the King for the time to come and he pays the penalty recovered or if he be Convicted upon Indictment and after such Conviction duly pays the Twenty pounds per month into the Exchequer and the King makes no Election to take the two third parts of his Estate in lieu thereof such Recusant may by this Proviso in either of those Cases Sue or Prosecute for any of his Lands Tenements Leases Rents Annuities or Hereditaments whatsoever notwithstanding his Conviction For when the penalty recovered is satisfied or the forfeiture appropriated to the King is duly paid into the Exchequer his Lands c. are not to be seized by force of any Law for Recusancy unless the King make his Election to have the two parts And until that Election they cannot in the sense of this Proviso be said to be Lands to be seized or taken into the Kings hands for that the King cannot have the two parts and the Twenty pounds per month both But if the King make no such Election and the Twenty pounds per month be duly paid into the Exchequer the Recusant is to hold and enjoy all his Lands Tenements c. as if he had never been convicted And during that time there can be no distinction made between the two parts and the Recusant's third part so that in this Case the Recusant must either be enabled to Sue and Prosecute for all his Lands c. or none and to think the latter of these were to render this Proviso nugatory and vain But when once the King hath seized the two thirds for recusancy either by way of Election or for nonpayment of the penalty then the Recusant is enabled to Sue only for the other third part whether in the hands of the King or of a common person Stat. Sect. 14. And for that Popish Recusants are not usually Married nor their Children Christned nor themselves Buried according to the Law of the Church of England but the same are done superstitiously by Popish Persons in secret whereby the days of their Marriages Births and Burials cannot be certainly known Stat. Sect. 15. Marriages of Popish Recusants Be it further Enacted by Authority of this present Parliament That every man being or which shall be a Popish Recusant convicted and who shall be hereafter Married otherwise then in some open Church or Chappel and otherwise then according to the Orders of the Church of England by a Minister lawfully Authorized shall be utterly disabled and excluded to have any Estate of Fréehold into any the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments of his Wife as Tenant by the Courtesie of England And that every Woman being or which shall be a Popish Recusant convicted and who shall be hereafter Married in other form then as aforesaid shall be utterly excluded and disabled not only to claim any Dower of the Inheritance of her Husband whereof she may be endowable or any Iointure of the Lands and Hereditaments of her Husband or any of his Ancestors but also of her Widows Estate and Frank-bank in any Customary Lands whereof her Husband died seized and likewise be disabled and excluded to have or enjoy any part or portion of the goods of her said Husband by vertue of any custom of any County City or Place where the same shall lie or be And if any such man shall be Married with any Woman contrary to the intent and true meaning of this Act which Woman hath or shall have no Lands Tenements or Hereditaments whereof he may be intituled to be Tenant by the Curtesie Then such man so Marrying as aforesaid shall forfeit and lose One hundred pounds the one half thereof to be to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors and the other moiety to such person or persons as shall Sue for the same by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoin Protection or Wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed Where the Husband is no offender Every man being or which shall be a Popish Recusant Convicted A Man who is no Popish Recusant Convicted marries a Woman who is a Popish Recusant Convicted in other form then is here appointed He shall not forfeit any thing or be disabled by this Act. By a Minister lawfully Authorized Minister lawfully Authorized In an Information upon this Statute for being married otherwise then is here appointed it is sufficient for the Defendant to say that he was married c. by a Minister lawfully Authorized without shewing in particular how or where or when but if a Traverse come of the other side then the Defendant is in his Rejoynder to shew the time and place Vide Bulstrode 2. 50. 52. Creswich against Rookesby Every Woman being or which shall be a Popish Recusant Convicted A Woman who is no Popish Recusant Convicted Where the Wife is no offender marries a Man who is a Popish Recusant Convicted in other form than is here appointed she shall not be disabled by this Branch of the Act For the forfeiture or disability extends only to the Popish Recusant Convicted and as in the Case before recited the Woman only shall be disabled so in this Case the Man only shall forfeit or be disabled Or any Ioynture of the Lands and Hereditaments of her Husband or any of his Ancestors Joynture A Feme who is a Popish Recusant Convicted and married otherwise then is appointed by this Act is not therefore disabled to have any sort of Joynture as Wingate tit Crowne n. 136. mistakes but only such Joynture as is of the Lands or Hereditaments of her Husband or some of his Ancestors and therefore if in consideration of some service done or for some other consideration and for the advancement of A. in marriage Lands are setled upon his intended Wife for her Joynture by some person besides A. who is not any of the Ancestors of A. such Joynture is not within this Act nor shall the Wife although a Popish Recusant Convicted and married otherwise c. be disabled by any strained construction of this Law to enjoy the Lands after her Husbands death For a penal Law shall be taken strictly and not by equity or intendment especially where the intent of the Lawmakers doth not appear to the contrary and the Case such as doth but rarely happen And 't is a good Rule in the construction of Statute Laws which the late Lord Chief Justice Vaughan hath laid down in his Argument of Bole and Hortons Case Mich. 25. Car. 2. viz. when the words of a Law extend not to an inconvenience rarely happening and do to those which often
meét to be Executors or Administrators to any person or persons whatsoever nor to have the Education of their own Children much less of the Children of any other of the Kings Subjects nor to have the marriage of them Be it therefore Enacted by the Authority aforesaid A Recusant shall not be Executor or Administrator That such Recusants convicted or which shall be convicted at the time of the death of any Testator or at the time of the granting of any Administration shall be disabled to be Executor or Administrator by force of any Testament hereafter to be made or Letters of Administration hereafter to be granted Or Guardian nor shall have the custody of any Child as Guardian in Chivalry Guardian in Socage or Guardian in nurture of any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments being Fréehold or Copyhold but shall be adjudged disabled to have any such Wardship or Custody of any such Child or of their Lands Tenements or Hereditaments being Fréehold or Copyhold as aforesaid Who shall have the Wardship And that for the better Education and Preservation of the said Children and of their Estates the next of the kin to such Child or Children to whom the said Lands Tenements or Hereditaments of such Child or Children cannot lawfully descend who shall usually resort to some Church or Chappel and there hear Divine Service and receive the holy Sacrament of the Lords Supper thrice in the year next before according to the Laws of this Realm shall have the Custody and Education of the same Child and of his said Lands and Tenements being holden in Knights Service until the full age of the said Ward of one and twenty years And of his said Lands Tenements and Hereditaments being holden in Socage as a Guardian in Socage And of the said Lands Tenements and Hereditaments holden by Copy of Court Roll of any Mannor so long as the Custom of the said Mannor shall permit and allow the same and in every of the said Cases shall yield an Accompt of the profits thereof to the said Ward as the Case shall require And that if at any time hereafter any of the Wards of the Kings Majesty or of any other shall be granted or sold to any Popish Recusant Convict such Grant or Sale shall be utterly void and of none effect Convicted at the time of the death of any Testator or at the time of the granting of any Administration Granting of Administration These words are to be construed reddendo singula singulis viz. That the Recusant shall be disabled to be Executor if he be convicted at the time of the death of the Testator or to be Administrator if he be Convicted at the time of the granting of Letters of Administration For so these words at the time of the granting of any Administration are here to be understood And therefore if a man makes his Will and therein appoints a Recusant Convict to be his Executor Executor where not disabled and before the Testators death the Conviction is removed by Reversal of the Judgment or avoided or discharged for some defect in the Indictment Proclamation or other proceedings and then the Testator dies In such Case the Recusant is not by this Act disabled to be Executor For although the naming of an Executor is in Law a granting of Administration And if a man by his last Will grants the Administration of his Goods and Chattels to J. S. without more saying thereby J. S. is made his Executor Dyer 290. So that the naming of an Executor and the granting of Administration seem to be the same thing yet this is not a granting of Administration within the meaning of this Act Administration here relating only to an Administrator and not to an Executor besides the naming of an Executor amounts not to a compleat grant of Administration until the Testators death For then and not before the Will becomes in force And if the party stands not then convicted he is not disabled Much less shall he be disabled to be Executor who is not convicted at the time of the Testators death although he be convicted at the time of the Probate of the Will For if these words granting of Administration should relate to an Executor as well as to an Administrator which in truth they do not yet the power given to the Executor by the Ordinary or Ecclesiastical Judge upon the probate of the Will cannot be called a granting but only a committing of Administration Committing of Administration What the Ordinary grants to an Executor according to the Will of the deceased And in such Case all that the Ordinary or Ecclesiastical Judge can grant are Letters testifying what the Testator hath already given to the Executor and a Power or Authority to execute the Will As Guardian in Chivalry Although the Recusant seized in Chivalry and Convicted could not have been Guardian yet if he had granted the Seigniory Seigniory granted over to one who was no Recusant the Grantee should have been Guardian notwithstanding this Act for the mischief here intended to be prevented was removed when the Seigniory was granted to another who was no Recusant By Jones Justice C. B. Hill 20. Jac. Jones 19. So if the King had seized Seized by the King the Recusants Seigniory as part of his two parts the King should have had the Wardship and not the next of kin for the same reason Jones 21. Stat. Sect. 22. Popish Books And be it further Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That no person or persons shall bring from beyond the Seas nor shall Print sell or buy any Popish Primmers Ladies Psalters Manuels Rosaries Popish Catechisms Missals Breviaries Portalls Legends and Lives of Saints containing superstitious matter Printed or Written in any Language whatsoever nor any other superstitious Books Printed or Written in the English Tongue upon pain of forfeiture of Forty shillings for every such Book one third part thereof to be to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors one other third part to him that will sue for the same and the other third part to the Poor of the Parish where such Book or Books shall be found to be recovered by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoin Protection or Wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed and the said Books to be burned Stat. Sect. 23. Popish Reliques and Books And that it shall be lawfull for any two Iustices of Peace within the Limits of their Iurisdiction or Authority and to all Mayors Bailiffs and Chief Officers of Cities and Towns Corporate in their Liberties from time to time to search the Houses and Lodgings of every Popish Recusant Convict or of every person whose Wife is or shall be a Popish Recusant Convict for Popish Books and Reliques of Popery And that if any Altar Pix Beads Pictures or such like Popish Reliques or any Popish Book
from the last day of this Session of Parliament deemed and remain utterly repealed void and of none effect to all intents and purposes Any thing in the said several Acts or any of them contained or any other matter or cause to the contrary notwithstanding Stat. Sect. 4. The abolishing of Forreign Authority And to the intent that all usurped and Forreign Power and Authority Spiritual and Temporal may for ever be clearly extinguished and never to be used or obeyed within this Realm or any other your Majesties Dominions or Countries may it please your Highness That it may be further enacted by the Authority aforesaid That no Forreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate Spiritual or Temporal shall at any time after the last day of this Session of Parliament use enjoy or exercise any manner of Power Iurisdiction Superiority Authority Preheminence or Priviledge Spiritual or Ecclesiastical within this Realm or within any other your Majesties Dominions or Countries that now be or hereafter shall be but from thenceforth the same shall be clearly abolished out of this Realm and all other your Highnesses Dominions for ever Any Statute Ordinance Custom Constitutions or any other matter or cause whatsoever to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding By the abrogating the Jurisdiction of any Forreign Prelate Archbishop of Canterburies concurrent Jurisdiction abrogated all Jurisdiction derived from such Forreigner is abrogated likewise And therefore the concurrent Jurisdiction which the Archbishop of Canterbury is supposed to have in the inferiour Diocesses ought not now to be exercised by him but is utterly taken away by this Act For he had it not as Archbishop but as Legatus natus to the Pope and if continued to be exercised is a meer Usurpation Hobart 17. Dr. James's Case And that also it may likewise please your Highness Stat. Sect. 5. Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction annexed to the Crown that it may be established and enacted by the Authority aforesaid that such Iurisdictions Priviledges Superiorities and Preheminences Spiritual and Ecclesiastical as by any Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Power or Authority hath heretofore béen or may lawfully be exercised or used for the Visitation of the Ecclesiastical State and Persons and for Reformation Order and Correction of the same And of all manner of Errors Heresies Schisms Abuses Offences Contempts and Enormities shall for ever by Authority of this present Parliament be united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm Sir Edward Coke 4. Inst 325. calls this an Act of Restitution of the ancient Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical which always belonged of Right to the Crown of England That is a restitution of the exercise of it For in truth this Statute is not introductory of a new Law The Kings ancient Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical but declaratory of the old and annexes not any Jurisdiction to the Crown but that which was or of right ought to be by the ancient Laws of this Realm parcel of the Kings Jurisdiction By which Laws the King as supream Head hath full and intire Power in all causes Ecclesiastical as well as Temporal For the Ecclesiastical Laws are the Kings Laws as well as the Temporal And the Judges of either of those Laws derive their Authority from him alone Co. 5.8 9. Cawdries Case where are several instances of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction exercised by the Kings of this Realm in several Ages Moore 755. b. 1043. The King is Persona mixta And in this respect the King is said to be Persona mixta and Persona mixta unita cum Sacerdotibus for that he hath both Ecclesiastical and Temporal Jurisdiction 10 H. 7.18 Co. 2.44 Bishop of Winchesters Case Coke 13.17 Case of Modus Decimandi Vid. Co. lib. 6. Praefac ' And supream Ordinary The King is the supream Ordinary and by the ancient Laws of this Realm may without any Act of Parliament make Ordinances and Institutions for the Government of the Clergy and may deprive them if they obey not Moore 755. C. 1043. Cro. Trin. 2. Jac. 37. And if there be a controversie between Spiritual Persons concerning their Jurisdiction the King is Arbitrator and 't is a right of his Crown to distribute to them and to declare their Bounds Hobart 17. Dr. James's Case Laws to be administred distinctly And yet although these Jurisdictions Ecclesiastical and Temporal are both in the King they are not to be confounded For although both Laws are the Kings Laws yet they are to be administred distinctly so that he who hath Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction derived from the King ought not to usurp upon the temporal Law And the Ecclesiastical Judge who meddles in Temporal Causes or Suits and draws the Interest or Cause of the Subject which ought to be determined by the Common Law ad aliud examen viz. to be decided by the Ecclesiastical Law offends contra Coronam dignitatem Regiam In confounding those Jurisdictions of the King which ought to be kept separate and distinct Prohibition And in such Cases not only a Prohibition lies but the Ecclesiastical Judge if the Cause originally belongs to the Common Law Pramunire and not to the Ecclesiastical Court incurs a Praemunire for depriving the Subject of the benefit of the Common Law which is his Birthright Co. 12.37 38 39 40. Co. 3. Inst 120. And therefore it was Resolved That if a man be excommunicated in the Bishops Court for a matter which belongs to the determination of the Common Law 't is no less than a Praemunire Praemunire And that by force of the word elsewhere in the Statute of 16 R. 2. cap. 5. Stat. 16 R. 2. 5. If any man pursue in the Court of Rome or elsewhere c. 5 E. 4.6 The King may do what the Pope might by the Canon Law By this and the former Clause which restores to the King the Title and Exercise of the Power of Supream Head of the Church of England and annexes to the Crown all Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction heretofore exercised by any Forreigner The King as supream Head may do whatever the Pope might formerly do within this Realm by the Canon Law And upon this ground it was resolved Trin. 39 Eliz. in Hollingworths Case in the Kings-Bench That notwithstanding the Statute of 25 H. 8. cap. 19. Stat. 25 H. 8. 19 which makes the sentence of the Delegates definitive and saith that no further Appeal shall be had yet the King after such definitive Sentence may grant a Commission of Review Commission ad revidendum For that after a definitive Sentence the Pope as supream Head by the Canon Law used to grant a Commission ad revidendum Co. 4. Inst 341. Upon this ground it was likewise resolved in the Case of Grendon versus the Bishop of Lincoln al' That the King with the consent of the Patron and without the Bishop may make an Appropriation Appropriation And in such Case the King doth it Authoritate sua regia
case of High Treason by the Laws of this Realm Vide Stat. 1 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 3. 6. Stat. 1 Eliz. 2. And also that it may likewise please your Highness Stat. Sect. 9. Within what time an Offender shall be impeached That it may be enacted by the Authority aforesaid That no manner of person or persons shall be molested or impeached for any the Offences aforesaid committed or perpetrated only by Preaching teaching or words unless he or they be thereof lawfully indicted within the space of one whole year next after his or their Offences so committed And in Case any person or persons shall fortune to be imprisoned for any of the said Offences committed by Preaching Teaching or words only and be not thereof indicted within the space of one half year next after his or their such Offence so committed and done That then the said person so imprisoned shall be set at liberty and be no longer detained in prison for any such cause or offence Within the space of one whole year Indictment within what time If a man had done any Deed or Act or executed any thing which amounted to the holding standing with or maintaining the Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction of any Forreign Prelate c. he might before the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1. have been indicted for it after the year expired For the Restraint here in point of time extends to Offences committed by Preaching Teaching or words only and not to all cases within this Branch as Wingate tit Crown numb 10. mistakes the meaning of the Clause But now by the Statute of 23. it seems that the prosecution must be within a year and a day for all Offences whatsoever against this Act. Within the space of one half year The half year Half-year here mentioned is not to be understood of six months as Wingate again mistakes which is in Law to be accounted secundum numerum singulorum dierum allowing 28 days to every month and not according to the Solar month nor according to the Kalendar unless it be upon the Statute of W. 2. cap. 5. W. 2. 5. 2 3 E. 6. 13. For the account of the lapse in a Quare Impedit and 2 3 E. 6. 13. of proving a suggestion Co. 1. Inst 135. Cro. Trin. 5. Jac. 166. 167. Bishop of Peterborough versus Catesby Yelverton 100. Catesby versus Baker Hobart 179. Copley versus Collins But the half year here is to be understood according to the Kalendar Sir Edward Coke 4. Inst 331. in his construction of this Statute saith That no persons shall be impeached for any of the Offences by Preaching Teaching or words unless they be lawfully indicted within the space of half a year But yet it seems that the words of the Statute will not bear such a Construction neither if they did is it Law at this day nor was when those Institutes were written For 1. The Statute where it speaks of half a year refers only to the Case of Imprisonment That where the Offender by Preaching Teaching or words is imprisoned and is not indicted within half a year after the Offence committed he shall be set at liberty and be no longer detained in Prison for any such Cause or Offence and this was done in favour of liberty and to prevent a long Imprisonment upon a malicious and groundless Accusation But there is no colour to extend the words to the Offender who was never imprisoned although the Offence was by Preaching Teaching or words only 2. But the Case that an Offender by Preaching Teaching or words had been imprisoned within the half year yet it seems very questionable whether at the half years end when he was set at liberty as he ought to be by this Act if he be not in the mean time indicted he should have been clearly discharged by this Act from any prosecution Prosecution during the half year then next following For although it be said he shall be no longer detained in Prison for any such Cause or Offence yet that seems to refer only to his Imprisonment before Conviction and detained imports as much viz. That he should not be continued or remain in the same Imprisonment which he suffered within the first half year before any Indictment was found against him but not that he should not be indicted afterwards within the compass of the year and if found guilty suffer the Imprisonment and other penalties inflicted by this Act. And it might so have happened that an Offender by Preaching Teaching or words might have been accused taken and imprisoned a day or two before the half year next after the offence expired In which Case it cannot be thought to be the meaning of the makers of the Law that by his Imprisonment for a day or two he should escape the penalties of the Law and could not be afterwards indicted within the compass of the year And yet in that case he ought to be set at liberty by the express words of the Act which saith He shall be set at liberty if not indicted within half a year after the Offence and not half a year after his Imprisonment 3. It seems now to be out of doubt but that any Offender against this Act although by Preaching Teaching or words may be indicted at any time within a year and a day after the Offence committed and that by force of the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. which saith Stat. 23 Eliz. 1. that all Offences against the Acts of 1 Eliz. touching Acknowledgment of her Majesties supream government in Causes Ecclesiastical shall and may be inquirable within a year and a day after the Offence committed And the affirming or maintaining the Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction of a Forreigner was without question an Offence against her Majesties supream Government in Causes Ecclesiastical and against the acknowledgment thereof so that the year limited by this Statute is now extended to a day farther and whatever the meaning of it was as to the half year All Offences against it whether by Preaching Teaching or words or otherwise for that of 23. is general and reaches all Offences whatsoever against the Act of 1 0. touching the Supremacy Ecclesiastical may now be inquired of within a year and a day whether the party be in Prison or not Within what time But yet it seems that in Case of Imprisonment within the first half year this Provision here for the setting at liberty of the Prisoner at the end thereof if he be not before that time Indicted remains still in force and is not abrogated by 23. Provided always Stat. Sect. 10. All things touching the Praemunire in the Statute 1. 2. P. M. 8. do continue in force and be it enacted by the Authority aforesaid That this Act or any thing therein contained shall not in any wise extend to repeal any clause matter or sentence contained or specified in the said
Ministers and Priests whatsoever For 't is held in our Law that as he is Sacerdos he ought and is bound jure divino celebrare Coenam Dominicam dictae Coenae orationes c. And if he be indicted upon this Statute with the addition of Clericus that word implies him to be a Priest or Minister within the meaning thereof Dyer 3. Eliz. 203. Note That by the Statute of 14 Car. 2. Stat. 14 Car. 2. This and all other Laws which were then in force for the Uniformity of Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments within the Realm of England are now applicable to the Book of Common Prayer Book of Common Prayer authorized by that Act of 14 Car. and are to be put in ure with relation to the said Book Wilfully or obstinately standing in the same These words wilfully or obstinately standing in the same seem to restrain the Law to such other Prayers as are used in hindrance of or opposition to the Common Prayer or after admonition or warning to the contrary Prayers in the Pulpit and therefore the Prayers used in the Pulpit before Sermon seem not to be within the meaning of this Law nor to be forbidden by it because generally tolerated by those in Authority and so not obstinately used And were those words wanting although the words of the Statute are general any other form or open Prayers yet they ought to have a particular construction according to reason and the intent of the makers of the Law viz. That no Minister shall use any other form to the hindrance of or in opposition to this For a penal Law shall not always be construed according to the words of it but according to the intent of the makers of it Plowden 18. Fogassa's Case Ib. 465 466 467. Eyston versus Studd Ibib. 109 110. Fulmerston versus Stewarde And the words of a Law may be infringed and yet the Law it self may not be infringed unless the intent be likewise Plowden 18. which intent shall never be construed to be against reason For many things are excepted out of Statutes by the Law of reason which yet are not excepted by express words Plowden 13. Fogassa's Case And 't is a general Rule to be allowed in construction of Statute Laws Quamvis Lex-generaliter loquitur restringenda tamen est ut cessante ratione ipsa cesset cum enim ratio sit anima vigorque ipsius Legis non videtur Legislator id sensisse quod ratione careat etiamsi verborum generalitas aliter suadeat Co. 4. Inst 330 331. Stat. Sect. 3. The penalty for the second Offence And if any such person once convict of any Offence concerning the premisses shall after this first conviction eftsoons offend and be thereof in form aforesaid lawfully convict that then the same person shall for his second offence suffer imprisonment by the space of one whole year and also shall therefore be deprived ipso facto of all his spiritual Promotions and that it shall be lawful to all Patrons or Donors of all and singular the same spiritual Promotions or of any of them to present or collate to the same as though the person or persons so offending were dead The penalty for the third Offence And that if any such person and persons after he shall be twice convicted in form aforesaid shall offend against any of the premisses the third time and shall be thereof in form aforesaid lawfully convicted that then the person so offending and convicted the third time shall be deprived ipso facto of all his spiritual Promotions and also shall suffer Imprisonment during his Life Where the second Indictment must mention the first conviction where not For his second Offence One is Indicted upon this Statute for administring Baptism in other form than is thereby prescribed And is convicted and afterwards he is again indicted for the like Offence By the Opinion of Clench Justice B. R. the second Indictment must mention the first Conviction or the Judgment cannot be for the second Offence viz. Imprisonment for a year and deprivation But Wray Chief Justice held That if both Indictments were before the same Justices they are to take notice of the first Conviction although it be not mentioned in the second Indictment and ought to give Judgment accordingly But if the second Indictment be taken by other Justices then without mention therein of the first Conviction they cannot give Judgment for the second Offence Leonard 1. 295. C. 403. The Benefice void without any Sentence To present or collate c. If the Offender against this Branch of the Act be judicially convicted of Record for the second or third Offence It seems that there needs not any Sentence declaratory by the Ecclesiastical Judge but his Benefices or spiritual Promotions are void ipso facto upon such Conviction For although the word void be not here as it is in the Statute of 21 H. 8. Stat. 21 H. 8. 13 13 Eliz. 12. c 13. of Pluralities And of 13 Eliz. cap. 12. about reading the 39 Articles Upon which Statutes 't is resolved that a Sentence declaratory is not necessary but that the Benefice is actually void without it Co. 4. 75. Hollands Case Co. 4. 79. Digbies Case Co. 6. 29. Greens Case yet the words here that the Patron may present or collate as if the person so offending were dead are tantamount and of as large an extent as if it had been said that his spiritual Promotions should be void And therefore if a Parson be convicted for the second or third Offence against this Statute and after such Conviction sues the Parishioners for Tythes it s a good plea to say that he stands convicted c. For he is thereby no longer Parson nor can sue for the Tythes no more than if he neglected to read the 39 Articles And that he is disabled in this last Case was adjudged Trin. 30 Eliz. in a Prohibition inter Morrice Eaton Vide Leonard 2. 212. C. 267. Wiggen and Arscotts Case nor will the Kings Pardon The Kings Pardon help or restore an Offender against this Act after the second or third Conviction no more than it will him who neglects to read the 39 Articles Vide Cro. Trin. 41 Eliz. 679 680. Baker versus Brent Robinson The Patron must at his peril take notice of a Conviction of the Incumbent upon this Statute Notice to the Patron not necessary For if he present not within six months after a Lapse will incur against him although no notice be given him For all men at their perils ought to take notice of an Act of Parliament to which every one is party 39 E. 3. 7. Bishop of Chichesters Case Dyer 7 Eliz. 237. Co. Hollands Case and Digbies Case supra In which three last Cases it was held That no notice to the Patron is necessary upon an avoidance by the Statute of 21 H. 8. of Pluralities Vide Termes de la
Contents thereof or secretly deliver out such Books to others he knowing the Contents thereof unless in this last Case he be a Trader in them and deliver them out upon that Account without any act or attribution by conference or allowance he is an Offender within this Act by the words Hold and stand with to maintain c. and so is the receiver likewise if he afterwards Reads and Confers upon any such Book with any other person and in his Conference by any Words or Speeches allows the Book to be good or conveys it secretly to his Friend to the intent he should Read it and be perswaded to be of that Opinion or if a man hear of the Contents of such Book by the report of others and doth by any overt Speech commend or affirm it to be good In all these Cases the Person so doing especially he that reads it and then allows of it is an Offender within this Act and shall for the first Offence incur a Praemunire and for the second be Guilty of high Treason So likewise if any Book to that effect be made and Written within the Realm and sent over Seas as if it were made out of the Realm and be afterwards Bought Read or Conference be had thereupon ut supra such Offences are within the danger of this Law Dyer 11 El. 281. 282. vide Co. l. 6. Praefat ' Vpon purpose and to the intent The intent material A. was Indicted upon this Statute and that of 13 Eliz. cap. 2. of a Praemunire for aiding one B. knowing him to be a principal maintainer of the Authority and Jurisdiction of the Bishop and See of Rome contra formam Statut ' praedict ' and the Indictment was certified into the Kings Bench And it was held by the greater part of the Justices that the Indictment was insufficient for want of those words Vpon purpose and to the intent to set forth and extol the Authority c. And contra formam Statut ' will not supply that defect Trin. 20 Eliz. Dyer 363. Note in the Report of this Case the Statute of 1 Eliz. is mistaken for this of 5 Eliz. there being no mention of the intent in that of Primo Stat. 1 Eliz. 1. The intent is a hidden thing and lies in the Heart and therefore there must be some overt Act or Speech which declares the intent for the intent it self is not traversable What traversable but that by which it is made manifest as was adjudged in Boothes Case Co. 5. 77. And it is also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. That as well Iustices of Assize in their Circuits as Iustices of Peace within Sect. 3 the limits of their Commission and Authorities What Justices may inquire of and certifie the Offences aforesaid or two of every such Iustices of Peace at the least whereof one to be of the Quorum shall have full Power and Authority by vertue of this Act in their Quarter or open Sessions to inquire of all Offences Contempts and Transgressions perpetrated committed or done contrary to the true meaning of the Premises in like manner and form as they may of other Offences against the Quéens Peace and shall certifie every Presentment before them or any of them had or made concerning the same or any part thereof before the Queén her Heirs and Successors in her or their Court commonly called the Kings Bench within forty days next after any such Presentment had or made if the Term be then open and if not at the first day of the full Term next following the said forty days upon pain that every of the Iustices of Assize or Iustices of the Peace The Penalty for default of Certificate of the said Offences before whom such Presentment shall be made making default of such Certificate contrary to this Statute to lose and forfeit for every such default One hundred pounds to the Quéens Highness her Heirs and Successors And it is Enacted by the Authority aforesaid The Justices of the Kings Bench may hear and determine the Offences aforesaid That the Iustices of the Kings Bench as well upon every such Certificate as by enquiry before themselves within the limits of their Authorities shall have full Power and Authority to hear order and determine every such Offence done or committed contrary to the true meaning of this present Act according to the Laws of this Realm in such like manner and form to all intents and purposes as if the Person or Persons against whom any Presentment shall be had upon this Estatute had beén Presented upon any matter of offence expressed in the said Estatute made in the said Sixteenth year of King Richard the Second All Offences c. contrary to the true meaning of the Premises That is the Offences in holding or standing with to extol c. the Jurisdiction of the See or Bishop of Rome or attributing such Jurisdiction c. or Procuring Counselling c. which is here for the first Offence made a Praemunire For these are the only Premises in the Act and this Clause extends not to the Oath of Supremacy or any Offence in refusing of it much less to all Offences against this Act as 't is mistaken in the late Additions to Dalton cap. 140. tit High Treason Sect. 11. Nor doth it seem to be the intent of the Statute to give the Justices of Peace any Power to inquire of any Offence made High Treason thereby The Power of Justices of Peace herein For the Power here given to the Justices of Peace is only to inquire of Offences contrary to the true meaning of the Premises and the Premises extend only to those Offences made a Praemunire And this clearly appears by the subsequent words viz. That the Presentment thereof shall be certified into the Kings Bench who shall hear and determine every such Offence as if the Offender had been Presented upon any matter in the Statute of 16 R. 2. Now that cannot be intended of High Treason And of Justices of Assize The like may be said of Justices of Assize for as they are meerly Justices of Assize they cannot by force of this Act inquire of either the first or second Offence in refusing the Oath of Supremacy nor of the second Offence in extolling the Bishop of Romes Authority only for the first Offence of this last kind they may inquire and take Indictments thereof and certifie them into the Kings Bench but then by their Commission of Oyer and Terminer they may not only inquire of the first or second Offence in extolling the Bishop of Romes Authority or refusing the Oath of Supremacy but may hear and determine them And accordingly were Slade and Bodye Indicted Arraigned and Tried in the County of Southampton of a Praemunire for the first Offence in extolling the Bishop of Romes Authority upon which they were Attainted and afterwards of Treason for the second Offence before Sir Roger Manwood and Justice
Periam Justices of Assize by vertue of their Commission of Oyer and Terminer For the Certificate here mentioned which is to be sent into the Kings Bench is required only of the Justices of Assize and Justices of Peace And of Oyer and Terminer But Justices of Oyer and Terminer upon Indictments taken before them may proceed to hear and determine as Manwood and Periam did in that Case as well for the first as second Offence Savile 46. 47. C. 99. For which first Offence in extolling the Bishop of Romes Authority it seems the Justices of Assize who have a Commission of Oyer and Terminer have their election either as Justices of Assize to inquire only and then they must certifie the Presentment or Indictment into the Kings Bench or to inquire hear and determine as they are Justices of Oyer and Terminer and then they are not bound to certifie For Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer are not within the meaning of this Branch of the Statute as was held in that Case of Slade and Bodye By what hath been said it appears that the question there put by Ayloffe scil how they could proceed upon such an Indictmen not certified into the Kings Bench within forty days was grounded upon a double mistake 1. That Justices of Oyer and Terminer were bound to certifie into the Kings Bench all Indictments for extolling the Authority of the Bishop of Rome taken before them 2. That Indictments for the second Offence were within the meaning of this Branch of the Statute For he speaks there of the second Indictment which was for High Treason Every Presentment Presentment what By Presentment here is to be understood not only that which is properly so called which the Jurors find and present to the Court without any former Indictment delivered them but also an Indictment which is drawn and ingrossed in form of Law and delivered to the Jurors to be inquired of which Indictment the Justices here named have power to take by force of the word inquire and is included within the word Presentment being a species of it For every Indictment found by the Jurors is a Presentment and the Record saith Juratores praesentant c. when they find an Indictment But every Presentment is not an Indictment Co. 2. Inst. 739. And as well the one as the other touching the Offences aforesaid must be certified into the Kings Bench. If the Term be then open First day of the Term. The Essoin day is the first day of the Term properly so called and on that day the Term is open At the first day of full Term. That is Quarto die post Full Term. which is the usual day of appearance and the first day of every Term in common reputation For the Essoin day is the first day of the Term only to some particular intents and 't is not full Term till quarto die post Savile 124. Co. 193. Matthew vers Harcourt So that if the Forty days expire on the day before the Essoin day the Presentment need not be certified until quarto die post Presentments when to be certified which is the day of appearance but if they expire on the Essoin day or afterwards and before the quarto die post the Justices here named must not stay till the quarto die post but are bound to certifie by the last day of the Forty days under the penalty here limited for the Term was then open Stat. Sect. 4. Who shall take the Oath set forth A◠1 E. 1. And moreover be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That as well all manner of Persons expressed and appointed in and by the Act made in the first year of the Quéens Majesties Reign that now is intituled an Act restoring to the Crown the antient Iurisdiction over the estate Ecclesiastical and Spiritual and abolishing all Forraign Powers repugnant to the same to take the Oath expressed and set forth in the same As all other Persons which have taken or shall take Orders commonly called Ordines Sacros or Ecclesiastical Orders have béen or shall be promoted preferred or admitted to any Degreé of Learning in any Vniversity within this Realm or Dominions to the same belonging And all Schoolmasters and publick and private Teachers of Children as also all manner of Person and Persons that have taken or hereafter shall take any Degreé of Learning in or at the Common Laws of this Realm as well utter Barristers as Benchers Readers Ancients in any House or Houses of Court and all principal Treasurers and such as be of the grand Company of every Inn of Chancery and all Attorneys Prothonotaries and Philizers towards the Laws of this Realm and all manner of Sheriffs Escheators and Feodaries and all other Person and Persons which have taken or shall take upon him or them or have béen or shall be admitted to any Ministry or Office in at or belonging to the Common Law or any other Law or Laws of to or for the Execution of them or any of them used or allowed or at any time hereafter to be used or allowed within this Realm or any of the Dominions or Countries belonging or which hereafter shall happen to belong to the Crown or Dignity of the same and all other Officers or Ministers of or towards any Court whatsoever and every of them shall take and pronounce a Corporal Oath upon the Evangelists before he or they shall be admitted allowed or suffered to take upon him or them to use exercise supply or occupy any such Vocation Office Degrée Ministry Room or Service as is aforesaid and that in the open Court whereunto he doth or shall serve or belong And if he or they do not or shall not serve or belong to any Ordinary or open Court then he or they shall take and pronounce the Oath aforesaid in an open place before a convenient Assembly to witness the same and before such Person or Persons as have or shall have Authority by common use or otherwise to admit or call any such Person or Persons as is aforesaid to any such Vocation Office Ministry Room or Service or else before such Person or Persons as by the Queéns Highness her Heirs or Successors by Commission under the Great Seal of England shall be named or assigned to accept and take the same according to the tenor effect and form of the same Oath Verbatim which is and as it is already set forth to be taken in the aforesaid Act made in the First year of the Queéns Majesties Reign Admitted to any Ministry or Office What Officers are to take the Oath of Supremacy All persons who are preferred to any such Ministry or Office whether of the gift of the King or of a Subject are bound to take this Oath and not only such as are preferred by the King as 't is restrained in the late Additions to Dalton Cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 9. Belonging to the Common Law
not extend to compell any Temporal person of or above the degrée of a Baron of this Realm to take or pronounce the Oath abovesaid nor to incur any penalty limited by this Act for not taking or refusing the same Any thing in this Act to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Where he ought to take it This Act. Although by this Act no Temporal person of or above the degree of a Baron is compellable to take this Oath yet if he be made a Justice of Peace he ought to take it by force of the Statute of 1 Eliz. cap. 1. Jones 152 153. Earl of Lincolns Case Stat. 1 Eliz. 1. A Bishop must take it Temporal Person By these words and the Preamble Forasmuch as c. Archbishops and Bishops although their possessions be Temporalties are excluded out of this Proviso and therefore are to take the Oath For every person who is of the degree of a Baron is not excused as Wingate tit Crown numb 29. mistakes but only the Temporal Lords of Parliament Stat. Sect. 12. Charitable giving Alms to Offenders shall be no cause of forfeiture Provided and be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That charitable giving of reasonable Alms to any of the Offender or Offenders above specified without fraud or covin shall not be taken or interpreted to be any such abettment procuring counselling aiding assisting or comforting as thereby the giver of such Alms shall incur any pain penalty or forfeiture appointed in this Act. Peers offending shall be tried by their Peers Provided also and be it Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That if any Peér of this Realm shall hereafter offend contrary to this Act or any Branch or Article thereof that in that and all such Case and Cases they shall be tried by their Péers in such manner and form as in other Cases of Treasons they have used to be tried and by none other means Provided also further and be it Enacted Stat. Sect. 13. Who only shall be compelled to take the Oath upon the second tender That no person shall be compelled by vertue of this Act to take the Oath above-mentioned at or upon the second time of offering the same according to the form appointed by this Statute except the same person hath beén is or shall be an Ecclesiastical person that had hath or shall have in the time of one of the Riegns of the Queéns Majesties most Noble Father Brother or Sister or in the time of the Reign of the Queéns Majesty her Heirs or Successors Charge Cure or Office in the Church Or such person or persons as had hath or hereafter shall have any Office or Ministry in any Ecclesiastical Court of this Realm under any Archbishop or Bishop in any the times or Reigns aforesaid Or such person or persons as shall wilfully refuse to observe the Orders and Rites for Divine Service that be authorized to be used and observed in the Church of England after that he or they shall be publickly by the Ordinary or some of his Officers for Ecclesiastical Causes admonished to kéep and observe the same Or such as shall openly and advisedly deprave by words writings or any other open fact any of the Rites and Ceremonies at any time used and authorized to be used in the Church of England Or that shall say or hear the private Mass prohibited by the Laws of this Realm and that all such persons shall be compellable to take the Oath upon the second tender or offer of the same and incur the Penalties for not taking of the said Oath and none other Charge Cure or Office in the Church What Clergy-men are punishable upon the second tender and refusal So that every Clergy-man or Person in Orders is not within the danger of this Law upon the second tender and refusal of the Oath as Wing tit Crown n. 30. mistakes For every Priest or Minister is Clericus Dyer 3 Eliz. 203. and yet shall not incur the penalty of High Treason upon the second refusal unless he be a local Minister or have some Charge Cure or Office in the Church By the Ordinary Ordinary what Ordinary in the Common Law is properly taken for the Bishop of the Diocess but yet usually in the Common Law and in Statutes for every Commissary or Official of the Bishop or other Judge that hath Ordinary Jurisdiction within his limits in Causes Ecclesiastical Stat. W. 2. cap. 19. Stat. 31 E. 3. cap. 11. Termes de la Ley 212. Ordinary 8 H. 6. 3. Co. 1. Inst 344. Or hear the private Mass Hearing Mass If a man once in his life time heareth private Mass it seems he is within this qualification and incurs High Treason upon the second refusal of the Oath and not only if he used to hear it as Wingate tit Crown numb 30. misrecites the Statute Stat. Sect. 14. It shall not be lawful to slay any one attainted in a Praemunire And forasmuch as it is doubtful whether by the Laws of this Realm there be any punishment for such as kill or slay any person or persons attainted in or upon a Praemunire Be it therefore Enacted by Authority aforesaid That it shall not be lawful to any person or persons to slay or kill any person or persons in any manner attainted or hereafter to be attainted of in or upon any Praemunire by pretence reason or authority of any Iudgment given or hereafter to be given in or upon the same or by pretence reason or force of any word or words thing or things contained or specified in any Statute or Law of Provision and Praemunire or in any of them Any Law or Statute or Opinion or Exposition of any Law or Statute to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Punishments inflicted by former Laws Saving always the due execution of all and every person and persons attainted or to be attainted for any Offence whereupon Iudgment of death now is or ought to be or hereafter may lawfully be given by reason of this Statute or otherwise And saving always all and every such pains of death or other hurt or punishment as heretofore might without danger of Law be done upon any person or persons that shall send or bring into this Realm or any other the Queéns Dominions or within the same shall execute any Summons Sentence Excommunication or other Process against any person or persons from the Bishop of Rome for the time being or by or from the See of Rome or the Authority or Iurisdiction of the same See The Judgment in a Praemunire The Judgment in a Praemunire is to be out of the Kings Protection his Lands Tenements Goods and Chattels to be forfeited to the King and that his body shall remain in Prison at the Kings pleasure Co. 1. Inst 129 130. Co. 3. Inst. 218. Rastal Entr. 466. Judgment But his entailed Lands he shall forfeit only during his Life For this Forfeiture must
one year and from thence forth till he have paid the said sum of Two hundred Marks And that every person which shall willingly hear Mass shall forfeit the sum of One hundred Marks and suffer Imprisonment for a year One hundred Marks And not Two hundred pounds Forfeiture as 't is mistaken in the late Additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 59. Be it also further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 5. The penalty for not coming to the Church by the space of a Month. That every person above the age of sixteen years which shall not repair to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer but forbear the same contrary to the tenor of a Statute made in the first year of her Majesties Reign for uniformity of Common Prayer and being thereof lawfully convicted shall forfeit to the Quéens Majesty for every month after the end of this Session of Parliament which he or she shall so forbear twenty pounds of lawful English money and that over and besides the said forfeitures every person so forbearing by the space of twelve months as aforesaid shall for his or her obstinacy after Certificate thereof in writing made into the Court commonly called the Kings-Bench by the Ordinary of the Diocess a Iustice of Assize and Goal-delivery or a Iustice of Peace of the County where such offender shall dwell or be be bound with two sufficient sureties in the sum of Two hundred pounds at the least to the good behaviour and so to continue bound until such time as the persons so bound do conform themselves and come to the Church according to the true meaning of the said Statute made in the said first year of the Queéns Majesties Reign Existens aetatis c. shall refer to the time of absence Above the age of sixteen years Talbot was Indicted upon this Statute Quod existens aetatis 16 annorum amplius non accessit ad Ecclesiam c. The question was whether the Existens aetatis 16 annorum should refer to the time of his Indictment or to the time of his absence And the Judges conceived that the Indictment was well enough and pursuant to the Statute And that Existens should in this Case refer to the time of his absence Moore 606. C. 838. Recusancy consists in omission Not repair c. but forbear This offence Consists not in committing but in omitting and is but a nonfeasance and therefore cannot be said to be in any certain place And for this reason in a Popular Action brought by the Informer qui tam c. there needs no place be alledged in the Declaration Anderson 1. 139. C. 190. Cuffe versus Vachel nor is Recusancy within that Branch of the Statute of 31 Eliz. cap. 5. Stat. 31 El. 5. which saith That the offence shall be laid in the proper County where it was done or committed For to speak properly it was not committed any where Hobart 251. Grimstone versus Molineux Vide infra Sect. 9. Conviction in the same Suit sufficient Being thereof lawfully convicted By this is not meant that the party must be convicted in some former Suit But a conviction upon the same Indictment or Information which is brought against him for the recovery of the 20 l. per month is a sufficient conviction within the meaning of this Statute And so are all penal Statutes which have in them those words being thereof lawfully convicted to be understood that is of a conviction in the same Suit whereupon the penalty is to be recovered For the meaning only is that the Offender shall forfeit nothing before conviction which is no more then the Law implies And therefore in truth these words are but superfluous and might have been as well omitted Co. 11. 59. Rolls 1. 90. C. 41. Dr. Fosters Case Rolls 1. 234. C. 6. Bulstrode 3. 87. The King against Law Nor is Conviction here intended only of a Convicton by Verdict What Conviction is here meant And therefore if the Offender be convicted upon his Confession of the fact and Judgment thereupon be had and consequently if Judgment be had against him upon a Demurrer which is a Confession of the matter of fact or if Judgment be given against him on nihil dicit for any other Cause any of these are sufficient Convictions whereupon to recover this Penalty For Convicted is here to be taken for Attainted as 't is in many other Cases For until Judgment he shall forfeit nothing And although he that is Convicted is not therefore Attainted yet every one who is Attainted or Adjudged is Convicted And of such a Conviction is this Statute to be understood Dr. Fosters Case Rolles 1. 89. 90. C. 41. Co. 11. 60. where several Cases are cited which prove that Convicted is oftentimes put for Attainted Shall forfeit to the Queens Majesty Shall forfeit i. e. to the King These words to the Queens Majesty are but surplusage and import no more than the Law would have given the Queen without them for where a Statute gives a forfeiture and limits it not to any particular person the King shall have it by Construction of Law as was agreed in the Case of Agard and Tandish Anderson 2. 128. C. 73. and so should he have this whole 20 l. per month if the Statute had staid here and had not afterwards made another express appointment Vid. Sect. 9. For every month Month what It seems that the month here mentioned shall be accounted secundum numerum singulorum dierum allowing but 28 days to a month For so are all Statutes to be understood which speak of the month unless W. 2. cap. 5. W. 2. 5. 2 3 E. 6. 13 for the account of a Lapse and 2 3 E. 6. of proving a suggestion Co. 1. Inst 135. Cro. Trin 5 Jac. 166. 167. Bishop of Peterburgh versus Catesby Yelverton 100. Catesby versus Baker Hobart 179. Copley versus Collins And of this Opinion the Court of Kings-Bench seemed to be upon Construction of the Statute of Liveries in the Case of Donner and Smith Trin. 43 Eliz. Cro. 835. The Recusant may forfeit for 13 months in a year so that by this account the Recusant shall forfeit thirteen score pounds in the whole year In an Information brought by Parker Qui tam Conformity in part not available c. against Sir John Curson and his Wife for the Recusancy of the Wife for eleven months and non culp pleaded It was proved at the Trial B. R. Pasch 17. Jac. that she conformed and came to Church for part of the time in the Information yet forasmuch as she was a Recusant both before and after it was said by the Court that her Conformity for some part of the time should not excuse her and she was found guilty for the whole time Cro. Jac. 529. The Informer demands less then is due The Informer shewed that the
Recusant was absent from Church from the 10 of September 15 Jac. unto the 9 of Sept. 16. Jac. and demanded Two hundred and twenty pounds for eleven monthes upon non culp pleaded it was found against the Defendant And it was resolved that although the Informer had demanded less then by his own shewing was due for the time mentioned in the Information was thirteen months compleat except one day yet the Information was well enough For the Recovery shall be intended to be for the eleven months when the Recusant was first absent and the addition of more time is not material Cro. Pasch 17 Jac. 529. 530. Rolles 2. 90. Parker versus Sir John Curson and his Wife And this is not like the Case of Bawderock versus Mackaller where the Informer Qui tam c. upon the Statute of Symony demanded less than the penalty and the Court seemed to be of Opinion that although it was good enough for the King notwithstanding that misprision yet it was not so for the Informer and compared it to the Case of Agard and Candish where an Information was brought upon the Statute of Liveries after the year and it was Adjudged to be good for the King but not for the Informer Cro. Mich. 9. Car. 331. For upon the Statute of Symony which gives one intire penalty for the offence if less be demanded the Statute is not pursued And there is a clear variance between that and the Information But in the Case of Recusancy when he demands Two hundred pound for eleven moneths the Statute is pursued and though it appears by the Information that the Recusant was absent for a longer time yet the Informer is at liberty whether he will demand the penalty for his absence during that supernumerary time The Informer demands for 13 months and the Jury find for 12. If it be shewed in the Information that the Recusant was absent from Church from a day certain to a day certain which in all makes 13 months and the penalty is demanded for that time and the Jury find the party guilty for 12 months It hath been held by some that the Verdict shall be good for 12 months But whether for the first 12 months is a question For in Sir J. Cursons Case supra the demand was but for 11 months And when the Jury finds the Defendant guilty it shall be intended to be for the 11 months for which the penalty is demanded and that shall be accounted from the 10 of September which was the first day of absence alledged in the Information and the rest of the time to the ninth of September following after the first eleven months is to be accounted as Surplusage But in this Case where the Jury abridges the time for which the penalty is demanded it may be questioned whether the Verdict shall be intended to be for the first twelve months of the thirteen And the Judges of the Kings Bench to salve a question of the like nature in an Information brought by Donner against Smith upon the Statute of Liveries seemed to be of Opinion That it is not material which were the twelve months wherein the party offended Cro. Trin. 43 Eliz. 835. But if that Opinion be Law it must follow that the party can never be punished for the thirteenth month but that must be remitted to him because it 's left uncertain which of the thirteen shall be accounted the month not found by the Jury And it rather seems for this reason That the Verdict is void for the uncertainty which twelve months of the thirteen the party offended unless it shall be intended of the first twelve Mr. Shephard in his Sure Guide cap. 6. Sect. 5. raises this Question viz. Stat. 1 Eliz. 2. This Statute having reference to that of 1 Eliz. cap. 2. which saith every one shall come to Church every Sunday and Holy-day whether he that is not at Church every Holy-day doth not rigore juris forfeit 20 l. a month by force of this Statute of 23. But this Question seems altogether needless The forbearance from Church must be for a whole month or no forfeiture of 20 l. For 't is clear by the express words here that it must be a forbearance from Church contrary to 1 Eliz. for a whole month together that makes the party liable to the forfeiture of 20 l. and if he comes to Church on any Sunday or Holy-day within the month he is freed from the penalty of 20 l. although not from the twelve pence by 1 Eliz. for the days of his absence if he comes not every Sunday and Holy-day both Be bound Some have made a question Recusants where to be bound to the good behaviour and among them Mr. Shephard in his Sure Guide cap. 6. Sect. 5. by whom or in what Court the Recusant shall be bound to the good behaviour by force of this Statute For that the Court is not expresly mentioned And Wingate in his Abridgment of this Clause tit Crown numb 44. hath stumbled upon a Conceit That after Certificate made into the Kings Bench a Justice of Assize Goal delivery or Peace shall bind the party to the good behaviour and misrecites the Statute accordingly But it seems That the intention of the Law-makers was that he should be bound in the Kings Bench and of that Opinion is Dalton V. cap. 75. title Good Behaviour For where any proceedings are appointed to be upon or after a Certificate sent to any Court there by common Intendment the proceedings are to be in that Court to whom the Certificate is sent if no other Court be named And it cannot be presumed by any reasonable construction of this Act That the Certificate into the Kings Bench is to any other end than for the Justices there to proceed in such manner as the Act directs to be done after such Certificate as no question they may in this Case as well as upon Certificate of a Presentment or of refusal of the Oath of Supremacy against the Statute of 5 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 5 Eliz. 1. quod vide supra And 't is a rule in construction of Statutes that where the intention plainly appears the Law ought to be advanced according to its end though the words be short and imperfect especially Laws made for Religion as is held in Colt and Glovers Case Hobart 157. and Magdalen Colledge Case Co. 11. Vide Bulstrode 2. 155. the Case of Griffith and others Popish Recusants convict not sufficient sureties Sufficient sureties Popish Recusants convicted are not to be reputed sufficient sureties and therefore were refused by the Court of Kings Bench in the Case of Griffith and other Recusants who were brought thither to be bound to their good Behaviour Bulstrode 2. 155. And be it further Enacted That if any person or persons body Politick or Corporate Stat. Sect. 6. The forfeiture for keeping of a Schoolmaster not repairing to Church or allowed by the Ordinary after
the Feast of Pentecost next coming shall kéep or maintain any School-master which shall not repair to Church as is aforesaid or be allowed by the Bishop or Ordinary of the Diocess where such School-master shall be so kept shall forfeit and lose for every month so kéeping him ten pounds Provided That no such Ordinary or their Ministers shall take any thing for the said allowance The penalty on such School-master And such School-master or Teacher presuming to teach contrary to this Act and being thereof lawfully convict shall be disabled to be a Teacher of youth and shall suffer Imprisonment without Bail or Mainprize for one year Any School-master An Usher Usher or Assistant in teaching is a Master in the School and seemeth to be included within the word School-master And the following words here or Teacher explain who is intended viz. every Teacher of Youth A School-master conforms or is licensed either of them sufficient Stat. 1 Jac. 4. 14 Car. 2. What he must do by Stat. 14 Car. 2. Repair to Church as is aforesaid or be allowed This Clause being in the dis-junctive It seems That although a School-master doth not come to Church yet if he be licensed by the Bishop or Ordinary it shall excuse the penalty And this is not altered in that particular either by the Statute of 1 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 9. quod vide postea nor by the Statute of 14 Car. 2. But then he must by that of 14 Car. 2. among other things for which Vide the Statute at large subscribe a Declaration or Acknowledgment that he will conform to the Liturgie of the Church of England as it is now by Law Established or he shall for the first Offence suffer three months Imprisonment without Bail and for the second and every other Offence shall suffer three months Imprisonment without Bail and also forfeit five pounds But if he be licenced and subscribe and do as aforesaid and so cannot be punished by this or either of the other said Acts yet now by the Statute of 17 Car. 2.2 unless he take the Oath there mentioned and frequent Divine Service established by the Laws of this Kingdom and carry himself there as in the said Statute is appointed he shall forfeit for every offence 40 l. So that now Conformity in repairing to Church is necessarily required of every such School-master No such Ordinary c. shall take anything Twelve pence for a Licence But now by the Statute of 14 Car. 2. there may be 12 pence taken for such Licence And be it likewise Enacted Stat. Sect. 7. What Justices may enquire of Offences done against the Stat. of 1 Eliz. 1. 5 El. 1. 13 El. 2. That all and every Offences against this Act or against the Acts of the first fifth or thirtéenth years of her Majesties Reign touching acknowledging of her Majesties Supream Government in Causes Ecclesiastical or other matters touching the Service of God or coming to Church or Establishment of true Religion in this Realm shall and may be inquirable as well before Iustices of Peace as other Iustices named in the same Statutes within one year and a day after every such Offence committed Any thing in this Act or in any other Act to the contrary notwithstanding Be it likewise Enacted That Iustices of Oyer and Terminer and Iustices of Assize and of Gaol delivery in their several limits shall have power to enquire hear and determine of all Offences against this Statute And Iustices of Peace in their open Quarter Sessions of Peace shall have power by vertue of this Act to enquire hear and determine of all Offences against this Act except Treason and misprision of Treason Within one year and a day Where the Indictment of the Offender was to have been within a year and day Stat. 1 Eliz. 1. 5 Eliz. 1. 13 Eliz. 2. This limitation of time extends not to any Offence made Treason by this Act but only to such Offences mentioned in this Act or those of 1 5 and 13 Eliz. as concern the Kings Supremacy in Causes Ecclesiastical the Service of God coming to Church or Establishment of Religion and for those touching Religion this Statute enlarges the time limited by 1 Eliz. cap. 2. which saith the party must be Indicted the next Sessions or if in a Corporation within fifteen days after Easter or Michaelmas for now he may be Indicted at any time within the year and day In what cases he may be Indicted afterwards But for absolving or withdrawing or for being absolved withdrawn or reconciled which are here made Treason no time is limited for the prosecution but the Offender may be Indicted at any time after the year and day For the latter part of this Clause speaks of those Offences of Treason which the Justices of Peace cannot hear and determine and there no time is limited although there be in the former part for those Offences which are inquirable by Justices of Peace Leonard 1. 238. C. 322. Guilfords Case Vide Stat. 1 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 9. infra Sect 9. touching the Informer Justices of Oyer and Terminer who Iustices of Oyer and Terminer and Iustices of Assize and of Gaol delivery c. and Iustices of Peace The Justices of the Court of Kings Bench are the Soveraign Justices of Oyer and Terminer and Gaol-delivery Co. 9. 118. Lord Sanchars Case and therefore may enquire of hear and determine the Offences against this Act although they be not here especially named Two Indictments before several Justices If an Indictment be preferred upon this Statute before Justices of Oyer and Terminer or of Assize for any offence not made Treason or misprision of Treason and there is an Indictment before Justices of Peace likewise for the same Offence The Judgment of the Justices who do first enquire hear and determine the same shall stand and the Judgment given by the other shall be void as was held in the like Case upon the Statute of Inmates Co. 2. Inst 739. Justices of Peace may hear and determine the Offence of not coming to Church Stat. 29 Eliz. 6. 3 Jac. 4. The power here given the Justices of Peace in their open Quarter Sessions to hear and determine the Offence of not coming to Church is in force at this day notwithstanding the Statute of 29 El. c. 6. which saith That every Conviction for not coming to Church shall be in the Kings Bench or at the Assizes or general Gaol-delivery and not elsewhere for the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 4. hath given power to Justices of Peace in their general or quarter Sessions to enquire hear and determine of all Offences for not coming to Church according to former Laws in such manner as the Justices of Assize and Gaol delivery might do by former Laws in the Case of Recusancy for not repairing to Church which is clearly a reviver of the Power of Justices of Peace given to them by this
Statute to proceed against Recusants and taken from them by 29 Eliz. nor doth that following Clause in 3 Jac. touching Conviction by Proclamation impeach this or restrain the Justices of Peace to proceed to Conviction upon Proclamation only and default of appearance no more than the Justices of Assize or Gaol delivery are restrained thereby or by 29 Eliz. which gives them likewise Authority to proceed by Proclamation For both these Clauses of 3 Jac. are in the Affirmative viz. First That the Justices of Peace shall have power to hear and determine the Offence of not coming to Church according to former Laws in such manner as Justices of Assize and Gaol delivery might do And those Justices might hear and determine that Offence according to this Statute of 23 Eliz. 23 Eliz. 1. And then comes the next Clause of 3 Jac. That the Justices of Peace shall have power to convict by Proclamation which is purely Affirmative also and therefore abrogates no part of the power given them by the former Clause And this agrees with what Sir Edward Coke saith lib. 12. fol. 13. That if a man be Indicted for Recusancy at the Assizes or Sessions of the Peace the Court may waive the proceedings by Proclamation upon the Statute of 3 Jac. 4. and may still if they please proceed against the party by Process upon this Statute of 23 Eliz. Upon this Stature In which Case the Process must be by Venire facias capias c. as in Indictments of Trespass And if saith he the party be fugitive in another County the Indictment may be removed into the Kings Bench and then Process may be there made out against him into any County of England In their open Quarter Sessions of Peace What is meant by Quarter Sessions By Quarter Sessions is intended here only the Sessions of the Peace held at four times of the year and not any other although it be a general Sessions And therefore the Justices of Peace in London who hold a Sessions every month cannot take Indictments upon this Statute at any of them unless it be the Quarter Sessions For that their Authority is given them only at a certain time as was resolved in the like Case upon the Statute of 5 Eliz. cap. 9. of Perjury Mich. 17 Jac. B.R. Palmer 44. Taylors Case Stat. 5 Eliz 9. 3 Jac. 4. And the Statute of 3 Jac. c. 4. which gives Justices of Peace Power to take Indictments of Recusancy at their General or Quarter Sessions for so the word said there imports having reference to the General or Quarter Sessions mentioned before about Presentments yet doth not enlarge the Power of the Justices of Peace in this particular nor enable them to take such Indictments at any Sessions but their four Quarter Sessions For although it be put there dis-junctively General or Quarter yet the latter word is but Explicative of the former and shews what General Sessions are meant as appears by the said Statute of 3 Jac. 4. and that other of 7 Jac. cap. 6. touching the Oath of Allegiance 7 Jac. 6. For in 3 Jac. 4. 't is said That if the party refuse the Oath he shall be committed to Goal until the next Assizes General Quarter Sessions and General or Quarter Sessions or General or Quarter Sessions And if he refuse the Oath tendred him by the Justices of Assize and Goal delivery in their open Assizes or by the Justices of Peace in their said general Quarter Sessions he shall incur a Praemunire And in 7 Jac. 6. That the party refusing shall be committed to Goal until the next Assizes or general Quarter Sessions and if he refuse the Oath tendred him by the Justices of Assize and Goal delivery in their open Assizes or Goal delivery or the Justices of Peace or the greater part of them in their general or Quarter Sessions he shall incur a Praemunire which clearly shews that the same thing is intended by general Quarter Sessions and General or Quarter Sessions And that all general Sessions which are not Quarter Sessions are excluded out of the meaning of those Statutes Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 11. 7 Jac. cap. 6. Sect. 5. Indictments only here intended To enquire hear and determine The Justices named in this Branch of the Statute are hereby impowered to proceed by Indictment only and no other way For they are to hear and determine after Inquiry And the word enquire implies an Indictment and is always so to be expounded And so are the other words hear and determine where other proceedings are not specially named as here they are not For the Action of Debt Information c. in any Court of Record is given to the Informer Qui tam c. afterwards in a distinct Branch by it self without any reference to this so that by this Statute and before that of 35 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 35 Eliz. 1 which gave the Queen an Action of Debt c. The Queen had no other remedy to recover the entire forfeitures given hereby but by Indictment only Co. 11. 60. Rolls 1. 93. C. 41. Dr. Fosters Case Vide Jones 193. For that and the Suit by the Common Informer are the only ways appointed by this Statute and the subsequent Clause of Submission which names the Justices before whom the party is to submit viz. the Justices before whom he is Indicted Arraigned or Tried shews what proceedings are meant which are to be had before the Justices here named that is by Indictment Hobart 205. Pie versus Lovell Offence and Penalty by two several Statutes Talbot and Shelden were Indicted for Recusancy Contra formam Statuti 23 Eliz. in which Indictment the penalty was demanded and in a Writ of Error the Judgment was reversed For the Offence is made by the Statute of 1 Eliz. cap. 2. Stat. 1 Eliz. 2 and the penalty is given by this Statute and therefore it should have been Contra formam Statutorum Owen 135. Wests Case Feme Covert when chargeable If a Feme Covert be Indicted at the Kings Suit for an offence within this Act she may be charged with the penalty after her Husbands death but the Husband is not chargeable nor shall pay the penalty for that he is no party to the Judgment And this was one of the causes of making the Statute of 35 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 35 Eliz. 1 By which Statute the King may have an Action of debt and recover the forfeiture against the Husband Rolles 1. 93. 94. Roy versus Foster Savile 25 C. 59. Except Treason and misprision of Treason This exception of Treason and misprision of Treason extends not to the Justices of Oyer and Terminer or of Assize and Goal delivery as Wingate hath mistaken in his Abridgment of this Clause tit Crown numb 46. Where the Justices of Peace cannot meddle but only to the Justices of Peace who are not to meddle in those two Cases
but the other Justices may Stat. Sect. 8. Provided alway That every person guilty of any offence against this Statute other then Treason and misprision of Treason which shall before he be thereof Indicted or at his Arraignment or Trial before Iudgment A remedy for a guilty person conforming himself submit and conform himself before the Bishop of the Diocess where he shall be resident or before the Iustices where he shall be Indicted Arraigned or Tryed having not before made like submission at any his Tryal being Indicted for his first like offence shall upon his Recognition of such submission in open Assizes or Sessions of the County where such person shall be resident be discharged of all and every the said Offences against this Act except Treason and misprision of Treason and of all pains and forfeitures for the same Before Iudgment submit and conform himself Conformity after judgment saves the penalty Stat. 1 Jac. 4. But now by the Statute of 1 Jac. cap. 4. if the Recusant conforms after Judgment it seems it shall be time enough to save the forfeiture Vide that Statute Sect. 2. A man is convicted of Recusancy according to the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. upon Proclamation and default of appearance 29 Eliz. 6. and afterwards submits and conforms he shall by force of this Clause be discharged of the forfeiture of Twenty pounds per month for this is a submission and conformity before Judgment Conviction upon Proclamation no Judgment the conviction upon Proclamation being no Judgment but only in nature of a conviction by Verdict as was resolved by all the Judges Mich. 37 38 Eliz. vide Dr. Fosters Case Rolls 1. 94 C. 41. Certain persons Indicted upon this Statute for not coming to Church were Outlawed upon the Indictment Submission after Outlawry the Court of Kings-Bench would not in this Case receive their submission but advised them to purchase their pardon for the Outlawry which they did and then their submission was accepted of and they were discharged Leonard 4. 54. n. 138. Note in the Report of this Case the Statute of 13 Eliz. is mistaken for this of 23 Eliz. for no Indictment for not coming to Church lies on 13. Stat. 13 Eliz. 2 Before the Bishop of the Diocess Conformity where and how to be pleaded If a man be Indicted for Recusancy before Justices of Pcace and he submits and conforms before the Bishop of the Diocess he may remove the Indictment by Certiorari into the Kings-Bench and there plead his conformity by Certificate under the Bishops Hand and Seal Vide Styles 26. For the manner of a Recusants submission and conformity before the Bishop after conviction Submission and Certificate and the Bishops certificate thereupon Vide Co. lib. intr 569. Stat. Sect. 9. Who shall have the money forfeited by this Statute And be it likewise Enacted That all forfeitures of any sums of money limited by this Act shall be divided in thrée equal parts whereof one third part shall be to the Queéns Majesty to her own use one other third part to the Queens Majesty for the relief of the Poor in the Parish where the offence shall be committed to be delivered by Warrant of the principal Officers in the Receipt of the Exchequer without further Warrant from her Majesty and the other third part to such person as will sue for the same in any Court of Record by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information In which Suit no Essoin Protection or Wager of Law shall be allowed And that every person which shall forfeit any sums of money by vertue of this Act He shall be imprisoned that is not able or doth not pay the forfeiture and shall not be able or shall fail to pay the same within thrée months after Iudgment thereof given shall be committed to Prison there to remain until he have paid the said sums or conform himself to go to Church and there do as is aforesaid Distribution of the penalties All forfeitures of any sums of money limited by this Act. So that the distribution here appointed extends not only to the forfeitures of Two hundred and One hundred Marks for saying or hearing Mass and the Ten pounds a month for keeping a Schoolmaster contrary to this Act but likewise to the Twenty pounds per month for not repairing to Church In which last Case the Informer Qui tam c. shall have the third part as well as in the other Cases For although by the foregoing clause the whole Twenty pounds per month is given to the Queen which the other forfeitures are not in express words yet that will not alter the Case nor make void the express appointment made here in what manner and to whom all the forfeitures limited by this Act shall be disposed of And 't is usual in Acts of Parliament to give the whole penalty for any criminal matter to the King and afterwards in the same Act to make distribution thereof and give part to him that will sue as in the Statutes of 3 H. 6. Stat. 3 H. 6. 3. 3 H. 7. 7. cap. 3. and 3 H. 7. cap. 7. and others And the subsequent distribution shall always stand good notwithstanding the precedent words of limitation of the whole to the King For those words in penal Statutes To the King or to the Queen are upon the matter but void and superfluous and give the King or Queen no other or stricter Interest then they would have had if they had been omitted and it had been only said shall forfeit without appointing to whom And the reason is for that the Law devolves the forfeiture upon the King where no other person is appointed and shall forfeit without more saying is as much as shall forfeit to the King But when afterwards in the same Statute a particular appointment is made how the penalty shall be distributed that qualifies the former general words and such distribution shall be made as the Statute appoints Co. 11. 60. Rolles 1. 89. 90. C. 41. Dr. Fosters Case Anderson 1. 139. 140. C. 190. Cuff against Vachell Vide supra Sect. 5. For relief of the Poor in the Parish Scot was Indicted upon this Statute for Recusancy Anno 26 Eliz. by the name of William Scot of Southwark Gent. and exception was taken to the Indictment for that within Southwark are several Parishes and the third part of the penalty is to be applied to the relief of the Poor of the Parish where the offence was committed But in this Case the Recusant being named generally of Southwark non potest constare Curiae where the Offence was nor to what Parish the third part of the penalty belongs But the whole Court of Kings-Bench were clear of Opinion The Parish need not be mentioned that the Indictment was good enough notwithstanding 't is not said of what Parish the Recusant was For the whole penalty of
Sorrell Leonard 1.119 C. 161. Stretton and Taylors Case Cro. Trin. 31 Eliz. 138. the same Case Ibid. Mich. 39 40 Eliz. 583. Hammon versus Griffith 1 H. 7. 3. Co. 3. Inst 194. Such Entry of a non vult prosequi by the Attorney General hath the same effect with a Nonsuit of a private person The King cannot be non-suited But the King cannot be said properly to be nonsuited because he is in Judgment of Law ever present in Court Co. 1. Inst. 139.227 Hutton 82. Goldsborough 53. Leighs Case Savile 56. C. 119. Weare versus Adamson Where upon the demise of the King the proceedings shall be void Upon the death of Queen Elizabeth it was resolved by the Judges That where an Information tam pro Domina Regina quam c. was brought upon a penal Statute and pending the same and before Judgment the Queen died the Information it self should stand for that otherwise the Suit might be lost there being a time limited for the bringing of it but all the proceedings thereupon were lost and void and the Defendant should plead de novo Cro. Pasch 1 Jac. 14. Co. 7. 30 31. Case Of discontinuance of Process And to that purpose the Case of Pasch 5 E. 6. Rot. 38. is there cited where in a popular Action the King died after Demurrer upon the Evidence and before Judgment and the Defendant pleaded de novo And where not But yet in a popular Action of Debt brought upon this Statute against Prince and his Wife where the Defendants demurred upon the Declaration and the Plaintiff Qui tam c. joyned in Demurrer in Hillary Term and King James died the Vacation following It was resolved that not only the Writ and Declaration but all the other proceedings thereupon should stand notwithstanding the Demise of the King For that in such Case it is meerly the Suit of the party Stat. 1 E. 6. 7. and is aided by the Statute of 1 E. 6. cap. 7. of Discontinuances and he only joyned in Demurrer Cro. Trin. 1 Car. 10. 11. Lionell Farringtons Case Hobart 82. the same Case Which Resolutions are in appearance flatly contrary each to other for that upon the death of the Queen seems to take in all popular Suits whatsoever and as well a popular Action of Debt as an Information But yet 't is observable that in Farringtons Case the Plaintiff only joyned in Demurrer and not the Kings Attorney And this seems to be the reason why in that Case the proceedings should stand notwithstanding the Demise of the King For where the party alone joynes in Demurrer or Replies and not the Kings Attorney there the Suit may properly be said to be depending between party and party and within the express words of 1 E. 6. which provides that although the King die all proceedings in Suits depending between party and party shall stand But the Resolution of the Judges upon the death of the Queen is to be understood of such Cases where after a Plea or Demurrer by the Defendant the Attorney General alone replies or joyns in Demurrer there the proceedings shall be void and the Defendant shall plead de novo But the Information it self shall stand to avoid a manifest inconvenience for that the Informer is limited to a certain time wherein to exhibit his Information And so I conceive are these two Opinions which seem so contrary to be reconciled An Informer Qui tam Nonsuit release c. of the Informer c. may be nonsuited although the King cannot Co. 1. Inst 139. Hutton 82. Farrington versus Arundell If pending the popular Action or Information the Plaintiff or Informer Qui tam c. be nonsuited or release or enter a nolle prosequi or dye none of these shall Bar the King but the Attorney General may proceed upon the Information for the Kings part Leonard 1. 119. C. 161. Stretton and Taylors Case No Bar for the Kings part Cro. Trin. 31 Eliz. 138. The same Case Ibid. Mic. 39 40 Eliz. 583. Hammon versus Griffith Co. 3. Inst 194. Moore 541. C. 715. Co. 11.66 Dr. Fosters Case Bulstrode 2. 261 262. Sir Thomas Waller versus Hanger Rolles 2.33 Smith versus Carter And therefore the Opinions in 37 H. 6.5 and 38 H. 6. 2. That if the Plaintiff in a Decies tantum which is a popular Action be nonsuit the King is without Remedy but by Indictment or if such Plaintiff will relinquish his Suit the King hath nothing further to do seem not to be Law at this day Information in a wrong Court And if a popular Information be brought upon a penal Statute in a wrong Court where the Informer cannot sue yet it was held in Agar and Candishes Case that the King should not for that lose his advantage of the Suit but the Information should be good for his part of the penalty Moore 564 565 566. C. 770. Stat. 18 Eliz. 5. By the Statute of 18 Eliz. cap. 5. if an Informer or Plaintiff upon a penal Statute where any forfeiture is generally limited to him that will sue shall delay or discontinue his suit or be non-suit The Informer shall pay costs or shall have the trial or matter pass against him by Verdict or Judgment of Law he shall pay to the Defendant his Costs Charges and Damages Vide Addition to Bendloes 141. Rhobotham versus Vincent and if it be upon special Verdict or Demurrer those Cases are within the Statute and he shall pay Costs by force thereof Hutton 36. Pies Case But not find Sureties But an Informer is not compellable to find Sureties to answer Costs howbeit the Court if they see cause may order him to appear in person before the Defendant answer the Information Bulstrode 2.18 Martin and Gunnystons Case It was held in the Exchequer Chamber That if a Writ of Error Writ of Error be brought upon a Judgment given for the King at the Suit of an Informer a Scire facias Scire facias ought to be awarded against the Informer Savile 10. C. 26. Wilkes Case Courts of Record in penal Statutes are the four Courts at Westminster In any Court of Record By any Court of Record is here meant the four Ordinary Courts of Record at Westminster For they are the general Courts of Record and the Courts where the Kings Attorney may acknowledge or deny and the words of this Statute being general are left to the construction of Law where the Rule is verba aequivoca in dubio posita intelliguntur in digniori potentiori sensu And in this sense shall these words Court of Record be construed in all penal Statutes where the penalty is to be recovered in a popular Suit So that the Informer Qui tam c. cannot sue before Justices of Assize Goal delivery or Oyer and Terminer or Justices of Peace as in Borough or Corporate Towns or in a Court of Pipowders Stannary Courts
aforesaid Stat. Sect. 5. Sending relief to any Jesuit Priest or other person abiding in a Seminary If any person under her Maiesties Subjection or obedience shall at any time after the end of the said forty days by way of Exchange or by any other shift way or means whatsoever wittingly and willingly either directly or indirectly convey deliver or send or cause or procure to be conveyed or delivered to be sent over the Seas or out of this Realm or out of any other her Majesties Dominions or Territories into any Forreign parts or shall otherwise wittingly and willingly yield give or contribute any money or other relief to or for any Iesuit Seminary Priest or such other Priest Deacon or Religious or Ecclesiastical person as is aforesaid or to or for the maintenance or relief of any Colledge of Iesuits or Seminary already erected or ordained or hereafter to be erected or ordained in any the parts beyond the Seas or out of this Realm in any forreign parts or of any person then being of or in any the same Colledges or Seminaries and not returned into this Realm with submission as in this Act is expressed and tontinuing in the same Realm That then every such person so offending for the same offence shall incur the danger and penalty of Praemunire mentioned in the Statute of Praemunire made in the sixteenth year of the Reign of King Richard the Second Convey Deliver Conveying or delivering relief to a Jesuite c. So that he who is barely a Messenger or Instrument to convey or deliver such money or other relief is within the danger of this Law as well as the sender or giver Then being of or in the same Colledges or Seminaries To what persons this extends to what not This Clause extends not to every person brought up in such Colledge or Seminary as Wingate tit Crowne n. 54. mistakes For if such person afterwards quits his Colledge or Seminary and hath no longer any relation thereunto but abides elsewhere beyond the Seas he who gives or conveys relief or maintenance to him is not within this branch of the Statute because the person relieved or maintained is not then of or in any Colledge or Seminary And yet perhaps this may be an offence within the Statute of 3 Car. 1. Stat. 3 Car. 1. 2 cap. 2. quod vide postea Stat. Sect. 6. None shall send his Child or other beyond the Seas without licence And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That it shall not be lawful for any person of or under her Highness obedience at any time after the said forty days during her Majesties life which God long preserve to send his or her Child other person being under his or her Government into any the parts beyond the Seas out of her Highness obedience without the special Licence of her Majesty or of four of her Highness Privy Councel under their hands in that behalf first had or obtained except Merchants for such only as they or any of them shall send over the Seas only for or about his her or their Trade of Merchandize or to serve as Mariners and not otherwise upon pain to forfeit and lose for every such their offence the sum of One hundred pounds Where the Offences committed against this Act shall be inquired of and determined And be it also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That every offence to be committed or done against the tenor of this Act shall and may be enquired of heard and determined as well in the Court commonly called the Kings-Bench in the County where the same Court shall for the time be as also in any other County within this Realm or any other her Highness Dominions where the offence is or shall be committed or where the Offendor shall be apprehended and taken Transporting of Jesuits Priests c. Provided also and be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That it shall and may be lawful for and to every Owner and Master of any Ship Bark or Boat at any time within the said forty days or other time before limited for their departure to Transport into any the parts beyond the Seas any such Iesuit Seminary Priest or other such Priest aforesaid so as the same Iesuit Seminary Priest or other Priest aforesaid so to be Transported do deliver unto the Mayor or other Chief Officer of the Town Port or Place where he shall be taken in to be transported his Name and in what Place he received such Order and how long he hath remained in this Realm or in any other her Highness Dominions being under her Obedience Stat. Sect. 7. A Jesuit or Priest submitting himself taking the oath and obeying the Laws Provided also That this Act or any thing therein contained shall not in any wise extend to any such Iesuit Seminary Priest or other such Priest Deacon or Religious or Ecclesiastical person as is before mentioned as shall at any time within the said forty days or within threé days after that he shall hereafter come into this Realm or any other her Highness Dominions submit himself to some Archbishop or Bishop of this Realm or to some Iustice of Peace within the County where he shall arrive or Land and do thereupon truly and sincerely before the same Archbishop Bishop or such Iustice of Peace take the said Oath set forth in Anno primo and by writing under his hand confess and acknowledge and from thenceforth continue his due obedience unto her Highness Laws Statutes and Ordinances made and provided or to be made or provided in Causes of Religion Continue his due Obedience The person submitting must continue his obedience The taking of the Oath by such Jesuit Priest or other Ecclesiastical person and his acknowledgment of his due obedience doth not exempt him from the danger of this Law as Wingate mistakes tit Crowne numb 57. but he must continue his due obedience to the Laws made in Cases of Religion And this seems to be clearly the meaning of the makers of this Law so that if afterwards he shew his disobedience to any of those Laws by forbearing to come to Church c. he may be indicted as a Traitor for coming into the Realm as if he had never made any such submission and acknowledgment Vnto her Highness Laws That is Where King or Queen includes successors the Laws of her and her Successors and not only those which were made in her own time but such likewise as should be made afterwards For in Acts of Parliament King or Queen if a Sovereign includes Successors unless there be express words of restraint to that individual person Plowden 176. Hill versus Grange Co. 6. 27. Cases de Soldiers Co. 12. 109. Co. 1. Inst 9. 2. Inst 742. 3. Inst 6. 4. Inst. 352. And so it is of the Kings Grants if in his politick capacity for there his Successor shall be charged though the Grant mention neither
the Reign of our most gracious Soveraign Lady the Quéens Majesty Entituled An Act to retain the Queens Majesties Subjects in their due Obedience Be it Enacted by Authority of this present Parliament That every Feoffment Gift Grant Conveyance Alienation Estate Lease Incumbrance and Limitation of use of or out of any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments whatsoever had or made at any time since the beginning of the Quéens Majesties Reign or at any time hereafter to be had or made by any person which hath not repaired or shall not repair to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer but hath forborn or shall forbear the same contrary to the tenor of the said Statute and which is or shall be revocable at the pleasure of such offender or in any wise directly or indirectly meant or intended to or for the behoof relief or maintenance or at the disposition of any such offender or wherewith or whereby or in consideration whereof such Offender or his Family shall be maintained relieved or kept shall be déemed and taken to be utterly frustrate and void as against the Queéns Majesty for or concerning the levying and paying of such sums of money as any such person by the Laws or Statutes of this Realm already made ought to pay or forfeit for not coming or repairing to any Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer or for saying hearing or being at any Mass and shall also be seized and had to and for her Majesties use and behoof as hereafter in this Act is mentioned Any pretence colour faigned consideration or expressing of any use to the contrary notwithstanding Stat. Sect. 2. Conviction of Recusancy shall be certified into the Exchequer And further be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That every Conviction heretofore recorded for any Offence before-mentioned not already estreated or certified into the Quéens Majesties Court of Exchequer shall from the Iustices before whom the Record of such Conviction shall be remaining be estreated and certified into the Queéns Majesties Court of Exchequer before the end of Easter Term next coming in such convenient certainty for the time and other circumstances as the Court of Exchequer may thereupon award out Process for seizure of the Lands and Goods of every such Offender as hath not paid their said forfeitures according to the Laws and Statutes in such Case provided In what Courts Conviction of Recusancy shall be And that every Conviction hereafter for any offence before mentioned shall be in the Court commonly called the Kings Bench or at the Assizes or general Goal delivery and not elsewhere and shall from the Iustices before whom the Record of such Conviction shall remain be estreated and certified into the said Court of Exchequer before the end of the Term next ensuing after every such Conviction in such convenient certainty as is aforementioned Sir Edward Coke in Dr. Fosters Case lib. 11. 61. saith That by this Clause as hath been well observed the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 33 Eliz. 1 In what Courts the Informer Qui tam c. may sue is altered in a material point viz. That whereas by 23. the Informer might sue the Recusant for the penalty in any Court of Record he is now by this Statute of 29. restrained from suing in the Common Pleas or Exchequer But this is utterly denied to be Law as the constant practice and experience ever since the making of this Statute sufficiently testifies And the Lord Chief Justice Hobart in his Report of Pie and Lovells Case saith That that Observation was made as he takes it by Sir Edward Coke himself But however this passage or observation as he calls it came to be inserted by Sir Edward Coke into his Report Sergeant Rolles in his Report of that Case of Dr. Foster lib. 1. 93. C. 41. brings him in speaking in another Language and more consonant to Law viz. That the Conviction here mentioned is intended of Convictions upon Indictments only and that no other sort of Convictions or proceedings upon the Statute of 23 Eliz. are mentioned or intended throughout this whole Act of 29. And if so then the Informer is not concerned in this Act nor restrained thereby as to the Courts wherein he is to sue but that he may sue still in the Common Pleas or Exchequer And so was it resolved in point in that Case of Pie and Lovell Hobart 204 205. where the Opinion of Sir Edward Coke reported by Rolles touching what sort of Conviction is meant here is confirmed and allowed for Law this Statute being made only for the benefit of the Queen in her Suits by Indictment and that other Opinion in the 11 Report exploded And the true reason is there given why those negative words and not elsewhere were added here viz. not to exclude the Informer out of the Common Pleas or Exchequer but to restrain Justices of Peace from proceeding to convict any person upon Indictments for Recusancy or for saying hearing or being at Mass which they were enabled to do by 23 Eliz. but again disenabled by those negative words in this Act and the hearing and determining of those offences committed only to the Justices of the Kings Bench Assizes and general Goal delivery But for Informations by a common Informer they were never intended here and the Justices of Assize and Goal delivery cannot hold Plea of such Informations as was resolved by the Judges Mich. 4 Car. 1. Jones 193. And yet this Statute did not wholly abrogate the power of the Justices of Peace Justices of P. may take Indictments for some offences against 23 El. 1 or of any other Justices to whom Authority was given by the Statute of 23 Eliz. in relation to the Offences of Recusancy or of saying or hearing Mass but that they might after this Statute of 29. take Indictments notwithstanding the negative words here For this Statute restrains them only from proceeding to Conviction but not from taking Indictments as was held in Edward Plowdens Case cited in Dr. Fosters Case Co. 11. 63. And now by the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 4. And hear and determine the offence of not coming to Church Stat. 3 Jac. 4. The power of Justices of Peace to hear and determine the Offence of not coming to Church is again restored to them Vide that Statute Sect. 5. And be it also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 3. At what time the money forfeited for not going to the Church shall be paid That every such Offender in not repairing to Divine Service but forbearing the same contrary to the said Estatute as hath beén heretofore convicted for such Offence and hath not made submission and béen conformable according to the true meaning of the said Statute shall without any other Indictment or Conviction pay into the Receipt of the said Exchequer all such sums of money as according to the Rate of twenty pounds for every month sithence the same
Conviction do yet remain unpaid in form as hereafter ensueth that is to say the one moiety thereof before the end of the next Trinity Term and the other moiety thereof before the end of the next Hillary Term or at any such other times as by the Lord Treasurer Chancellor and Chief Baron of the Exchequer or any two of them shall by composition upon good Bond and Surety taken be limited before the end of the said next Trinity Term if any such Composition shall happen to be And shall also in every Easter and Michaelmas Term until such time as the same person do make Submission and be Conformable according to the true meaning of the said Statute pay into the said Receipt of the Exchequer twenty pounds for every month which shall incur in all that mean time Stat. Sect. 4. And be it also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That every such Offender in not repairing to Divine Service but forbearing the same contrary to the said Estatute as hereafter shall fortune to be thereof once convicted shall in such of the Terms of Easter or Michaelmas as shall be next after such Conviction pay into the said Receipt of the Exchequer after the rate of twenty pounds for every month which shall be contained in the Indictment whereupon such Conviction shall be And shall also for every month after such Conviction without any other Indictment or Conviction pay into the Receipt of the Exchequer aforesaid at two times in the year that is to say in every Easter Term and Michaelmas Term as much as then shall remain unpaid after the rate of Twenty pounds for every month after such Conviction The Queen may take all the Goods and two parts of the Lands and Leases of the Offender who pays not 20 l. a month And if default shall be made in any part of any payment aforesaid contrary to the form herein before limited that then and so often the Quéens Majesty shall and may by Process out of the said Exchequer take seize and enjoy all the Goods and two parts as well of all the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leases and Farms of such Offender as of all other the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments liable to such seizure or to the penalties aforesaid by the true meaning of this Act leaving the third part only of the same Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leases and Farms to and for the maintenance and relief of the same Offender his Wife Children and Family What Conviction is here meant and when the penalty is appropriated to the King Once convicted This Statute meddles not with any other way of Conviction then at the Queens Suit by Indictment as hath been said And so is the Conviction here mentioned to be understood For this Statute is not introductory of a new Law nor gave the Queen any new or other remedy then what she had against the Recusant by the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. that is by Indictment but only gave her a more speedy way of proceeding upon that fundamental remedy Co. 11. 60. Dr. Fosters Case Rolles 1. 93. C. 41. the same Case so that a Conviction upon an Information against the Recusant upon 23. or any other way save by Indictment doth not appropriate the penalty of twenty pounds per month to the King for the time to come by force of this Statute Hobart 205. Pye and Lovells Case nor for the same reason by force of that 3 Jac. cap. 4. where the same words are used and a Conviction by Indictment only intended as here In that Case of Pye and Lovell its said That if a man at the making of this Statute had been convicted of Recusancy by any other means then by Indictment he had not been bound by this Law to pay the twenty shillings It should be twenty pounds a month from the Conviction And if a man be now convicted in the Kings Bench by Indictment or otherwise he cannot be proclaimed nor otherwise his penalty run on which last words infer that the Conviction here intended is only a Conviction according to this Statute by Proclamation upon default But if we compare together this Clause which speaks of a Conviction after the making of this Statute and the former Clause which speaks of a Conviction before this Statute the contrary will evidently appear For the former Clause touching Conviction before this Statute must necessarily be intended of Convictions according to 23 Eliz. cap. 1. without any Proclamation For the Proclamation in the Case of Recusancy was not given until 29. And if a man had been convicted of Recusancy upon Indictment in the Kings Bench or elsewhere before this Act the forfeiture of 20 l. per month should by force of this Act have run on from the time of such Conviction that 's clear by the express words of the former Clause Then comes this Clause which provides what shall be done upon Convictions for the future and appoints in that Case likewise the forfeiture of 26 l. per month to run on from the time of Conviction Both which Convictions as well before as after this Statute are granted to be meant only of Convictions upon Indictment And there is no difference between the penning of these two Clauses but that one respects the time past and the other the time to come but both appoint the penalty to run on Now there is no reason to suppose that the makers of the Law intended the word Convicted in a more restrained sense in this Clause then in the former Clause where the penalty should have run on upon any conviction whatsoever upon Indictment or that the conviction in the former Clause by Indictment upon 23. without Proclamation should be wholly shut out of the later Clause By Conviction therefore in these two Clauses seems to be meant such Convictions upon Indictment as were warranted by the Statutes in force at the several and respective times here mentioned That is in the former which speaks of the time foregoing a Conviction upon 23 Eliz. without Proclamation and in this later which speaks of the time to come a Conviction either with or without a Proclamation In either of which Cases the penalty of 20 l. per month shall run on by force of this Act and consequently it shall run on if the Recusant be Indicted Convicted and adjudged in the Kings Bench although he cannot be proclaimed there And accordingly it was agreed in Dr. Fosters Case that where the Recusant is convicted upon Indictment the penalty should ever after run on and be appropriated to the King Roiles 1. 93. C. 41. And 't is not restrained there to a Conviction upon Proclamation only But yet although this Clause extends as well to a Conviction upon 23 Eliz. as to a Conviction by Proclamation yet every Conviction upon 23 Eliz. is not here intended For if a man Indicted of Recusancy do upon his Arraignment confess the Indictment to be true and plead guilty or upon Trial a
as aforesaid after notice thereof to him or them given by the Ordinary of the Diocess any Iustice of Assizes of the Circuit or any Iustice of Peace of the County or the Minister Curate or Churchwardens of the Parish where such person shall then be or by any of them shall forfeir to the Queéns Majesty for every person so relieved maintained retained or kept after such notice as aforesaid ten pounds for every month that he or they shall so relieve maintain retain or kéep any such person so offending What sort of Recusants may be reliev'd or kept Rep. 3 Jac. 4. Provided nevertheless That this Act shall not in any wise extend to punish or impeach any person or persons for relieving maintaining or kéeping his or their Wife Father Mother Child or Children Wards Brother or Sister or his Wives Father or Mother not having any certain place of habitation of their own or the Husbands or Wives of any of them or for relieving maintaining or keéping any such person as shall be committed by Authority to the custody of any by whom they shall be so relieved maintained or kept Any thing in this Act contained to the contrary notwithstanding Repeal Stat. 3 Jac. 4. This Branch is repealed by the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 4. Quod vide infra Sect. 24. Stat. Sect. 8. The Queens Remedy to recover forfeitures c. And for the more spéedy levying and recovering for and by the Quéens Majesty of all and singular the pains duties forfeitures and payments which at any time hereafter shall accrue grow or be payable by virtue of this Act or of the Statute made in the threé and twentieth year of her Majesties Reign concerning Recusants Be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all and every the said pains duties forfeitures and payments shall and may be recovered and levied to her Majesties use by Action of Debt Bill Plaint Information or otherwise in any of the Courts commonly called the Kings Bench Common Pleas or Exchequer in such sort and in all respects as by the ordinary course of the Common Laws of this Realm any other Debt due by any such person in any other Case should or may be recovered or levied wherein no essoign protection or wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed A new remedy given to the Queen Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 All and every the said pains duties forfeitures and payments These words are not to be understood simpliciter or exclusive as if the forfeitures upon the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. could be recovered no other way then what is prescribed here But only they give the Queen a new remedy for the recovery of them which she had not before and take not away the Remedy given by 23 Eliz. upon Indictment 29 Eliz. 6. nor that by the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. upon Indictment and Proclamation nor the Informers popular Suit given him by 23. For all these three are affirmative Laws and do not abrogate one the other The former Laws not abrogated but may well stand together And the meaning of them taken together is That if the Informer recover the forfeiture upon that of 23. he shall have his part thereof But if the Offender were Indicted at the Queens Suit and Judgment had against him upon 23. or if he were convicted upon Proclamation and default upon 29. The Queen should have the whole penalty excluding the Informer for he shall not be punished again for the same offence at the Suit of the Informer But if the offender were neither Indicted nor Sued by the Informer Qui tam c. the Queen should have another Remedy to recover the intire forfeiture by Action of Debt c. upon this Statute and the Informer shall have no part thereof So that the Remedies given by these three Statutes are Cumulative and not Privative and there is no Repugnancy or disagreement between them but they have a dependance on each other The informer not aided here But as this Statute doth not abrogate any of the former Laws touching Recusancy nor takes away the Informers popular Suit so it adds nothing as to the Informer nor gives him any more speedy remedy for the recovery of the forfeiture but leaves him in the same condition as he was in before to take his remedy upon 23. Co. 11. 61 62. Rolles 1. 90 91 93. c. 41. Dr. Fosters Case Cro. Pasch 16 Jac. 481. Bridgman 121. 122. Parker vesus Webb To her Majesties use A more speedy remedy here given Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Before this Statute the Queen had no other way to recover the intire penalty for Recusancy or any other offence within the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. but by Indictment only but by this Statute a more speedy remedy was given her by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information Vide the Cases before cited Shall and may be recovered The King by the Statute of 31 Eliz. cap. 5. 31 Eliz. 5. Within what time the King must sue is restrained in this Case to three years after the offence committed within which time he must pursue the remedy here given him for the recovery of the forfeiture but it seems that he is not restrained to two years for where the forfeiture is limited to the King and him that will sue there the Informer hath one year and the King the next two years if the Informer doth not sue within the first year of the three and the restraint in 31. of the King to 2 years next after the Offence committed where the forfeiture is limited to the King extends not to this Case For although the King is enabled by this Statute to sue for the intire forfeiture yet the intire forfeiture was not originally limited to the King only for the Informer may sue upon 23 Eliz. as well as the King may upon this Act. And where the Informer may sue it was not the meaning of 31 Eliz. to limit the King to two years after the offence committed but he may stay if he please till the Informers year is expired and then the Statute gives him two years afterwards to sue for the penalty Where the King is limited to a year and a day where not Much less is the King limited to sue upon this Statute within a year and a day and what is said in Dr. Fosters Case Co. 11. 65. viz. that for any forfeiture before the year and day neither the King nor the Informer hath any remedy for that that time is limited in certain by 23 Eliz. is a clear mistake of the meaning of that Statute of 23. touching the year and day for the limitation there of a year and a day extends only to the Kings Suits by Indictment and not to the popular Suit given by 23. much less to the Action of Debt c. given to the King by this Statute See more of this matter supra in the Statute of 23 Eliz.
cap. 1. Sect. 9. in that part touching the Informer and the Cases there cited to prove that no other Suits are restrained by that Statute to a year and a day but only Suits by Indictment By Action of Debt Bill Plaint Information If the King sue by any of these ways no Proclamation Proclamation can be made thereupon For the Proclamation given by the Statutes of 29 Eliz. 6. 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 29 Eliz. 6 3 Jac. 4 in Case of Recusancy at the Kings Suit is upon Indictment only Co. 11. 62. Dr. Fosters Case The Kings-Bench Common-Pleas or Exchequer This Statute adds two other Courts where the King may sue for Recusancy Two Courts added where the King may sue Stat. 29 Eliz. 6 or for saying or hearing of Mass For by 29 Eliz. cap. 6. the Queen was limited to the Kings-Bench the Assizes or general Goal delivery and that only by way of Indictment but now by this Statute she might sue not only in those Courts by Indictment but in the Kings-Bench Common-Pleas or Exchequer by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information Co. 11. 61. Dr. Fosters Case But whereas 't is there said that this Statute of 35 takes not off the restriction of the Informer Qui tam c. by the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. to the Courts there mentioned viz. the Kings-Bench Assizes and general Goal delivery This passage was occasioned by an opinion there held in the said Case of Dr. Foster that the Informer Qui tam c. was restrained by 29. to those Courts The Informer not restrained by 29 Eliz. 6. But that opinion is not Law nor was there ever any such restriction of the Informer for the Statute of 29 Eliz. intends only Suits by Indictment but touches not the popular Action or Information Vide Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 2. As c. any other Debt c. should or may be recovered Before this Statute the Queen had no way to recover of the Husband the intire forfeiture for the Recusancy of his Wife For if the Wife had been Indicted of Recusancy at the Queens Suit and convicted thereupon this had not affected the Husband who shall never be charged for the Act or default of his Wife but where he may be made party to the Action or Suit as in an Action of Debt Trespass Action of the Case for scandalous words by the Wife c. but not upon an Indictment And in this respect the Queen having before this Statute no remedy for recovery of the forfeiture but by Indictment where the Husband could not be charged for his Wife the Informer was then in better Case then the Queen For he may charge the Husband and Wife both for the Recusancy of the Wife and shall recover the forfeiture of him by force of the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Vide that Stat. Sect. 9. But upon the Conviction of the Wife upon Indictment the Queen must have staid till the death of the Husband before she could have levied the forfeiture and if the Wife had died before her Husband it was utterly lost in most Cases Baron and Feme may be charged for Recusancy of the feme But by this Act the Queen might and the King may at this day charge the Husband and Wife joyntly by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information for the Recusancy of the Wife in such sort as he may be charged in any other Action at Common Law for the Debt or Trespass of his Wife and the forfeiture for her Recusancy shall be recovered of him And this was the principal end and scope of making this Branch of the Statute and to this purpose were these words added here In such sort and in all respects as by the ordinary course of the Common Laws of this Realm any other Debt due by any such person in any other Case should or may be recovered Co. 11. 61 62. Dr. Fosters Case Rolles 1. 233 234. Roy versus Law son feme Savile 25. C. 59. Provided always Stat. Sect. 9. How the third part of the Penalties shall be imployed That the third part of the penalties to be had or received by vertue of this Act shall be imployed and bestowed to such good and charitable uses and in such manner and form as is limited and appointed in the Statute made in the 28. year of her Majesties Reign touching Recusants The Statute here mentioned Stat. 29 Eliz. 6 and called the Statute of 28 Eliz. is the same with 29 Eliz. cap. 6. before recited It being in some Books called the Statute of 28 in others of 29 but as it seems more properly 29. For the Session wherein it was made was by Prorogation held the 15 of February 29. Eliz. Provided also That no Popish Recusant Stat. Sect. 10. Popish Recusant or Feme Covert not to abjure Popish recusant or Feme Covert shall be compelled or bound to abjure by vertue of this Act. No Popish Recusant Here Wingate tit Crowne n. 77. leads his Reader into a great mistake for he mentions only a Feme Covert leaving out the Popish Recusant Feme Covert not here excepted in all Cases Or Feme Covert In the late additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 7. 't is said that no married Woman is punishable by this Statute but are thereout excepted whereas in truth they are no where excepted throughout this Statute save only that they shall not be compelled or bound to abjure For if a married Woman comes not to Church but forbears for a month and goes to Conventicles or any other Meetings or Assemblies under colour or pretence of the exercise of Religion contrary to Law whether they be Popish or other or perswades others so to do or to forbear the Church or to impugne the Kings Authority in Causes Ecclesiastical she shall be imprisoned by force of this Act until she conform and submit her self but she cannot be further proceeded against so as to require her to abjure A married Woman with her Husband is likewise punishable by this Act for her Recusancy by Action of Debt c. brought against her and her Husband at the Kings Suit so that 't is a great mistake to say she is not punishable by this Statute Stat. Sect. 11. The forfeiture of him that abjures or refuses to abjure The Wise shall lose no Dower nor the heir any Land for these Offences Provided also That every person that shall abjure by force of this Act or refuse to abjure being thereunto required as aforesaid shall forfeit and lose to her Majesty all his goods and chattels forever and shall further lose all his Lands Tenements and Hereditaments for and during the life only of such offender and no longer and that the Wife of any Offender by force of this Act shall not lose her dower nor that any corruption of Blood shall grow or be by reason of any offence
enlarged of such Imprisonment or Restraint and shall be able to Travel repair to their place of dwelling where they usually heretofore made their common abode and shall not at any time after pass or remove above five miles from thence Stat. Sect. 2. Or to be convicted shall repair to his usual dwelling and not remove above five miles And also That every person being above the age of sixtéen years born within any her Majesties Realms or Dominions or made Denizen and having or which hereafter shall have any certain place of dwelling and abode within this Realm which being then a Popish Recusant shall at any time hereafter be lawfully convicted for not repairing to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer to hear Divine Service there but forbearing the same contrary to the said Laws and Statutes and being within this Realm at the time that they shall be convicted shall within forty days next after the same Conviction if they be not restrained or stayed by Imprisonment or otherwise as is aforesaid and in such Cases of restraint and stay then within twenty days next after they shall be enlarged of such Imprisonment or Restraint and shall be able to Travel repair to their place of usual dwelling and abode and shall not at any time after pass or remove above five miles from thence The punishment of an Offender upon pain that every person and persons that shall offend against the tenor and intent of this Act in any thing before mentioned shall lose and forfeit all his and their Goods and Chattels and shall also lose and forfeit to the Quéens Majesty all the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments and all the Rents and Annuities of every such person so doing or offending during the Life of the same Offender What Popish Recusants are not within this Act Born within any her Majesties Realms or Dominions or made Denizen So that all Popish Recusants are not within this Branch as Wingate tit Crown n. 78. mistakes For it extends not to an Alien who is born out of the Kings Leigeance unless he be made Denizen And which are In the late Additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 14. this Clause is restrained to such as are born in England but it is clear that it extends to all the Kings natural Subjects if they live in England although they were born in Ireland or any other of the late Queens Dominions besides England Denizen who By Denizen is here to be understood an Alien who owes to the King an acquired Subjection or Allegiance whether he be made Denizen by the Kings Letters Patents or be naturalized by Act of Parliament For Naturalization includes all the priviledges of a Denizen and something more and every one who is naturalized is thereby made a Denizen although he that is made a Denizen by the Kings Letters Patents is not thereby naturalized Which being then a Popish Recusant This is the first penal Statute which was made against Popish Recusants by that name and as distinguished from other Recusants In the late Additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 7. What is Recusancy it 's said That the matter of Recusancy stands in two particulars First absenting from the Church Secondly refusing the Oaths prescribed by 1 Eliz. 1. and 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 1 Eliz 1. 3 Jac. 4. But this description of Recusancy is either too narrow or too large For if the word Recusancy be taken in a large sense then the refusing to receive the Sacrament contrary to the Statute of 3 Jac. 4. by him that conforms and comes to Church may be as fitly called a point of Recusancy as the refusing the Oaths of Supremacy or Allegiance But if Recusancy be taken in a strict and proper sense then it extends only to the point of not coming to Church and not to refusing the Oaths of Supremacy or Allegiance And in this last sense are all the Statutes to be understood which inflict any penalty or disability upon a Recusant or a Popish Recusant unless where the not receiving of the Sacrament is particularly mentioned And this appears by the explanation which the Statutes make every where of Conformity the opposite to Recusancy viz. repairing to Church What is Conformity and more particularly the said Statute of 3 Jac. 4. which saith That the Popish Recusant convicted which conforms himself and repairs to the Church shall receive the Sacrament which words and repairs to the Church are explanatory of the former viz. which conforms himself so that this Conformity is not intended of taking the Oaths of Supremacy or Allegiance but consists only in repairing to Church and consequently Recusancy its opposite properly so called consists in absenting from Church And this appears further by that Branch of the said Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 4. which relates to the Oath of Allegiance where 't is said That the Oath shall be required of him who confesseth or denieth not himself to be a Recusant or that he hath not received the Sacrament where Recusant cannot be understood in any other sense then of him who forbears to come to Church An Information or Indictment against a Popish Recusant Information or Indictment against a Popish Recusant for Recusancy is of the same form with that against any other Recusant viz. That he came not to his Parish Church or any other Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer but forbore the same by the space of c. Vide Co. lib. intr 569. Co. 11. 56. Dr. Fosters Case so that upon his Conviction for Recusancy it doth not appear of Record whether the Offender be a Popish or other Recusant And therefore where this or any of the subsequent Statutes commands or prohibits a Popish Recusant convict to do a thing and a person convicted of Recusancy who is a Popish Recusant be Indicted thereupon his Conviction must be set forth in the Indictment with this or the like confusion Per quod praedict A.B. devenit Papalis Recusans convictus so it is if a Popish Recusant Convict be incapacitated to take or to give or dispose of any thing and another person be substituted by the Statute in his stead as in the Case of a Presentation by force of the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 5. Stat. 3 Jac. 5. in a Quare Impedit Quare Impedit brought by the Chancellor and Schollars of the University His Conviction must be be set forth with an averment that he is Papalis Recusans Vide Co. 10. 54. And if a Popish Recusant whether convicted or not convicted be so commanded prohibited or incapacitated in an Indictment or Information upon the Statute it must be averred that he is Papalis Recusans A person who hath a certain place of abode is convicted for not coming to Church What Popish Recusants are not within this Act. and afterwards becomes a Papist being none before It seems that he is not restrained
apprehended The three months relate to the time of the Offenders being apprehended whereas by the Act he cannot be required to abjure until three months after his apprehension and he turns the three months after his apprehension into three months after his arrival All great mistakes and fit to be taken notice of by Justices of Peace whose part it is to require the submission and abjuration that they may not be misled in the Execution of this part of their Office by trusting to that Abridgment Required to submit within what time Being thereunto required by the Bishop c. If the Offender be not before the end of the three months next after his apprehension required by the Bishop a Justice of Peace or the Minister or Curate to make such submission he cannot be required afterwards nor be compelled to abjure by force of this Act. But if he be required within the three months to make submission and refuse he may be at any time afterwards warned or required to abjure Vide Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 2. Abjure this Realm of England c. The Oath of Abjuration may be in this form or to this effect Oath of Abjuration You shall swear that you shall depart out of this Realm of England and out of all other the Kings Majesties Dominions And that you shall not return hither or come again into any of his Majesties Dominions but by the Licence of our said Sovereign Lord the King or of his Heirs So help you God Stamford 119. 120. Co. 3. Inst 217. Wilkinson P. 66. hath set down another form upon this Statute much resembling that heretofore used at the Abjuration of a Felon mutatis mutandis in these words This hear you Sir Coronor that I J. M. of H. in the County of S. am a Popish Recusant and in Contempt of the Laws and Statutes of this Realm of England I have and do refuse to come to hear Divine Service there read and exercised I do therefore according to the intent and meaning of the Statute made in the 35th year of Queen Elizabeth late Queen of this Realm of England abjure the Land and Realm of King Charles now King of England Scotland France and Ireland and I shall hast me towards the Port of P. which you have given and assigned to me And that I shall not go out of the highway leading thither nor return back again and if I do I will that I be taken as a Felon of our said Lord the King And that at P. I will diligently seek for passage and I will tarry there but one Flood and Ebb if I can have passage and unless I can have it in such space I will go every day into the Sea up to my Knees assaying to pass over So God me help and his holy Judgment But in alluding to the old Oath in Case of abjuration for Felony which began with the Confession of the particular offence for which the Felon was abjured as Ego A. B. sum latro unius Equi vel homicida unius hominis or the like as the Case was Wilkinson is mistaken in the very offence for which the Popish Recusant is to abjure by force of this Statute for the offence is not his refusal to hear Divine Service for that is but only one of the precedent Qualifications of the person But the Offence it self is of another nature viz. his not repairing to the place the Statute appoints him or his removal from thence contrary to the Statute or his not presenting himself and delivering his true name as aforesaid Either of these if he be a Popish Recusant within the meaning of this Act is a crime for which he ought to abjure unless he prevents his Abjuration by a timely Submission Nor is the Popish Recusant bound to swear that he will not go out of the High way or return back or will tarry but one flood and ebb or go into the Sea up to his knees nor ought the Coroner or Justices of Peace to require any such Oath of him For this is a new offence made by a Statute Law which doth not require the strict form of Abjuration as in Case of Felony And although the Felon were tied to these circumstances yet the Recusant is not nor shall be a Felon for omitting them But 't is sufficient if he simply abjure as the Act directs and go from the appointed Port within the time limited and not return without Licence into any of the Kings Dominions He that thus abjures the Realm doth yet owe the King his Ligeance and remaineth within the Kings Protection He that abjures yet oweth the King his Ligeance Qui abjurat Regnum amittit regnum sed non Regem amittit Patriam sed non patrem patriae Co. 7. 9. Calvins Case And if any such Offender Stat. Sect. 7. The punishment for refusing to abjure not departing or returning without Licence which by the tenour and intent of this Act is to be abjured as is aforesaid shall refuse to make such Abjuration as is aforesaid or after such Abjuration made shall not go to such Haven and within such time as is before appointed and from thence depart out of this Realm according to this present Act or after such his departure shall return or come again into any her Majesties Realms or Dominions without her Majesties special Licence in that behalf first had and obtained That then in every such Case the person so offending shall be adjudged a Felon and shall suffer and lose as in Case of Felony without benefit of Clergy And within such time c. and from thence depart When and whence the Offender must depart The Offender is strictly tied to depart from the same Haven assigned him and within the time appointed him by the Justices of Peace or Coroner so that if he depart the Realm from any other Haven or Port or over stay his time and depart afterwards yet he is a Felon within this Act. Or return or come again into any her Majesties Realms or Dominions An Offender within this Act abjures in form aforesaid and departs this Realm and afterwards goes into Ireland without Licence Return and then returns into England with Licence such going into Ireland seems to be Felony by this Act. But quaere how the offence shall be tried How triable not in Ireland for this Statute binds not that Kingdom nor can be taken notice of there nor yet can it be tried in England for that the offence was done elsewhere So that this is casus omissus and cannot be punished for that no way of Trial is appointed Stat. Sect. 8. A Jesuit or Priest refusing to answer shall be imprisoned And be it further Enacted and Ordained by the Authority aforesaid That if any person which shall be suspected to be a Iesuit Seminary or Massing Priest being examined by any person having lawful Authority in that behalf to examine such
or covin nor for convenient time taken for their return back again upon the same This extends to all Cases in general where the Popish Recusant ought to render his body to the Sheriff upon Proclamation Proclamation and is not restrained to a Proclamation upon an Indictment for Recusancy And therefore if a Popish Recusant confined by this Act had been proclaimed upon the Statute of Marlebridge in a Plea de Custodia as a Deforceor he might lawfully have gone out of the compass of five miles The like he may do at this day upon any other Proclamation commanding him to render his body to the Sheriff Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 5. Sect. 7. And furthermore be it Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament Stat. Sect 12. An Offender upon open submission shall be discharged That if any person or persons that shall at any time hereafter offend against this Act shall before he or they shall be thereof convicted come to some Parish Church on some Sunday or other Festival day and then and there hear Divine Service And at Service time before the Sermon or reading of the Gospel make publick and open Submission and Declaration of his and their Conformity to her Majesties Laws and Statutes as hereafter in this Act is declared and appointed That then the same Offender shall thereupon be clearly discharged of and from all and every pains and forfeitures inflicted or imposed by this Act for any of the said Offences in this Act contained Before he or they shall be thereof convicted Where submission will save abjuration A Popish Recusant confined by this Act whose Estate is under value is apprehended for offending against this Act and before the expiration of three months next after his apprehension is convicted of such Offence and then before the said three months expire conforms and makes such Submission and Declaration as is here and in the former branch appointed In this Case although he comes too late after Conviction to save the forfeiture of his Lands and Goods yet he shall not be compelled to abjure For the affirmative words here that upon such Conformity Submission and Declaration before Conviction he shall be discharged of all pains and forfeitures do not carry in them the force of a negative viz. That if it be after Conviction he shall not be discharged of any of them And by the former branch of the Statute he is not compellable to abjure if at any time within three months next after his apprehension he conforms confesses and submits as is there appointed To some Parish Church It must be in some Parish Church It seems clear that no Submission Confession or Declaration can discharge the Popish Recusant who is an Offender within this Act from any pain or forfeiture thereby inflicted unless it be performed in some Parish Church For there is a great difference between the penning of this Statute and that branch of 35 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 35 Eliz 1. where 't is said That the Offender shall be committed to Prison until he come to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer and hear Divine Service and make such open Submission and Declaration of his Conformity as in the Act is appointed For there there is an express designation of the place where such Submission and Declaration shall be viz. in any Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer whither the Offender comes and this shall free him from his Imprisonment Vide that Statute Sect. 4. supra But here where 't is said in the former part of this Act That he shall abjure unless he comes usually to Church and make such Confession and Submission as is therein afterwards appointed and expressed His coming usually to Church cannot be applied to his Confession and Submission for that is to be made but once and not usually and therefore there being there no place appointed where this Confession and Submission shall be made we must necessarily have recourse to this later branch of the Act where a place is appointed viz. some Parish Church so that the coming usually to Church without this formal Submission and Confession or Declaration in some Parish Church frees not the Offender here in any Case from abjuration although the coming to any Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer and hearing Divine Service and making open Submission and Declaration there shall free an Offender within the Statute of 35 Eliz. cap. 1. from Imprisonment Parish Church What is a Parish Church Vide Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 4. supra Two several Submissions Submission If a Popish Recusant Indicted upon this Statute makes his Submission and brings with him into the Court of Kings Bench a Testimonial thereof it s the course of that Court to cause him there to make his Submission again upon his knees which the Clerk of the Crown reads to him And so was it done in the Case of one Thoroughgood Pasch 2. Car. 1. But Justice Jones said there was no Statute to compell him to this second Submission And Thoroughgood complained that he was not therein dealt with according to Law Latch 16. Stat. Sect. 13. The same Submission to be as hereafter followeth that is to say The form of the Submission I A. B. do humbly confess and acknowledge that I have grievously offended God in contemning her Majesties godly and lawful Government and Authority by absenting my self from Church and from hearing Divine Service contrary to the Godly Laws and Statutes of this Realm and I am heartily sorry for the same and do acknowledge and testifie in my Conscience that the Bishop or See of Rome hath not nor ought to have any Power or Authority over her Majesty or within any her Majesties Realms or Dominions And I do promise and protest without any dissimulation or any colour or means of any Dispensation That from henceforth I will from time to time obey and perform her Majesties Laws and Statutes in repairing to the Church and hearing Divine Service and do my uttermost endeavour to maintain and defend the same Over her Majesty or within any her Majesties Realms or Dominions What Authority of the Pope is to be renounced And not over her Majesty within any her Dominions as Wingate tit Crown numb 85. grosly misrecites this Submission For that denies only the Popes or See of Romes Authority over her Majesty but not any other Authority which they might claim over her Subjects And 't is clear by the disjunctive or which Wingate omits that both these Authorities are intended to be denied by this Submission Or any colour or means of any Dispensation Dispensation These words which are a very material part of the Submission are likewise omitted by Wingate Her Majesties Laws and Statutes The Queens Laws Stat. 27 Eliz. 2. What is meant by her Majesties Laws Vide Stat. 27 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 7. And that every Minister or
Curate of every Parish where such Submission and Declaration of Conformity shall hereafter be so made by any such Offender as aforesaid Stat. Sect. 14. The Minister shall enter the Submission into a Book shall presently enter the same into a Book to be kept in every Parish for that purpose and within ten days then next following shall certifie the same in writing to the Bishop of the same Diocess Provided nevertheless Stat. Sect. 15. A Recusant submitting and falling into Relapse That if any such Offender after such Submission made as is aforesaid shall afterward fall into Relapse or eftsoons become a Recusant in not repairing to Church to hear Divine Service but shall forbear the same contrary to the Laws and Statutes in that behalf made and provided That then every such Offender shall lose all such benefit as he or she might otherwise by virtue of this Act have or enjoy by reason of their said Submission And shall thereupon stand and remain in such plight condition and degrée to all intents as though such Submission had never beén made Such Relapse with the Indictment thereof Relapse where to be certified is to be certified into the Court of Exchequer as was done by the Justices of the Kings Bench in the Case of Francis Holt. Pasch 9 Jac. Bulstrode 1. 133. Stat. Sect. 16. Married Women bound by this Act saving in the Case of Abjuration Provided always and be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all and every Woman married or hereafter to be married shall be bound by all and every Article branch and matter contained in this Statute other then the Branch and Article of Abjuration before mentioned And that no such Woman married or to be married during marriage shall be in any wise forced or compelled to abjure or be abjured by virtue of this Act Any thing therein contained to the contrary thereof notwithstanding Stat. i Jac. cap. iv An Act for the due execution of the Statutes against Jesuits Seminary Priests Recusants c. FOr the better and more due execution of the Statutes heretofore made aswell against Iesuits Stat. Sect. 1. All Statutes made against Jesuits Priests and Recusants shall be put in Execution Seminary Priests and other such like Priests as also against all manner of Recusants Be it Ordained and Enacted by Authority of this present Parliament That all and every the Statutes heretofore made in the Reign of the late Quéen of famous memory Elizabeth as well against Iesuits Seminary Priests and other Priests Deacons Religious and Ecclesiastical persons whatsoever made ordained or professed or to be made ordained or professed by any Authority or Iurisdiction derived challenged or pretended from the Sée of Rome as those which do in any wise concern the withdrawing of the Kings Subjects from their due obedience and the Religion now professed and the taking of the Oath of obedience unto the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors together with all those made in the said late Quéens time against any manner of Recusants shall be put in due and exact execution Oath of Obedience By the Oath of Obedience Oath of Obedience Stat. 1 Eliz. 1. is here meant the Oath of Supremacy in the Stat. of 1 Eliz. cap. 1. which see there Sect. 7. and by that name it is here called afterwards Sect. 3. Provided nevertheless Stat. Sect. 2. A Recusant conforming himself shall be discharged and be it Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That if any that is or shall be a Recusant shall submit or reform him or her self and become obedient to the Laws and Ordinances of the Church of England and repair to the Church and continue there during the time of the Divine Service and Sermons according to the true meaning of the Statutes in that behalf in the said late Quéens time made and provided That then every such person for and during such time as he or she shall so continue in such conformity and obedience shall from thenceforth be freed and discharged of and from any the penalties and losses which the same person might otherwise sustain and bear in respect or by reason of such persons Recusancy According to the true meaning of the Statutes in that behalf It hath been doubted whether these words do refer only to the manner of the Recusants conformity or to the time likewise when it is to be done as well as to the manner For if they refer to the time then the Recusant is still bound notwithstanding this Statute to conform before Judgment according to the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 or his conformity afterwards shall not discharge him of the penalty But the better opinion is that by these words according to the true meaning of the Statutes is to be intended only that the Recusant must conform in such manner as is there appointed but as to the time the general words here have inlarged the time limited by 23 Eliz. If the Recusant conforms after Judgment 't is sufficient For this Statute is made in further favor of the Recusant So that now if he conforms after Judgment 't is time enough and he shall be discharged of all penalties in respect of his Recusancy And if an Information tam pro Domino Rege quam pro seipso be brought upon the Statute of 23 Eliz. against the Recusant and after Judgment had against him thereupon he conforms he shall be discharged of the Judgment but first his Conformity must appear of Record otherwise the Court cannot take notice of it and as for that his remedies against the King and the Informer must be several His remedies against the King and informer Audita Quaerela Plea for against the Informer he must bring his Audita Quaerela and against the King he must plead his conformity which he may do in this Case after Judgment for that no Audita Quaerela lies against the King 11 H. 7. 10. and if he should not be admitted to plead he would be without any legal Remedy to discharge himself of the forfeiture and Judgment as to the Kings part whose execution will not be hindred by the Audita Quaerela against the Informer But if the Defendant neglect to put in his Plea and Execution issues for the King and he be taken in Execution he comes too late to plead his Conformity and hath then no other way left to relieve himself as to the Kings part but by his Petition Petition to the King to pardon the Debt Bulstrode 2. 324 325. Dr. Fosters Case Rolles 1. 95. C. 41. the same Case Vide Savile 23. C. 56. Tirringhams Case Stat. Sect. 3. And if any Recusant shall hereafter die his heir being no Recusant that in every such Case every such heir shall be freed and discharged of all and singular the penalties charges and incumbrances happening upon him or her In what Cases a Recusants heir shall be
Parliament Assembled tending to the utter subversion of the whole State lately undertaken by the instigation of Iesuits and Seminaries and in advancement of their Religion by their Schollers taught and instructed by them to that purpose which attempt by the only goodness of Almighty God was discovered and defeated And where divers persons Popishly affected do nevertheless the better to cover and hide their false hearts and with the more safety to attend the opportunity to execute their mischievous designs repair sometimes to Church to escape the penalty of the Laws in that behalf provided For the better discovery therefore of such persons and their evil affections to the Kings Majesty and the State of this his Realm Stat. Sect. 2. to the end that being known their evil purpose may be the better prevented Be it enacted by the Kings most excellent Majesty the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament Assembled and by the Authority of the same That every Popish Recusant convicted or hereafter to be convicted which heretofore hath conformed him or her self or which shall hereafter conform him or her self and repair to the Church and continue there during the time of Divine Service according to the Laws and Statutes in that behalf made and provided shall within the first year next after the end of this Session of Parliament if he or she be conformed as aforesaid before the end of this Session of Parliament or within the first year next after that he or she shall after this Session of Parliament so conform him or her self and repair to Church as aforesaid and after the said first year shall once in every year following at the least receive the blessed Sacrament of the Lords Supper in the Church of that Parish where he or she shall most usually abide or be within the said year wherein by the true meaning of this Statute he or she ought so to receive The forfeiture of a conformed Recusant which doth not receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper yearly And if there be no such Parish Church then in the Church next adjoyning to the place of his or her such most usual abode And if any Recusant so conformed shall not receive the said Sacrament of the Lords Supper accordingly he or she shall for such not receiving lose and forfeit for the first year Twenty pounds and for the second year for such not receiving Forty pounds and for every year after for such not receiving thréescore pounds until he or she shall have received the said Sacrament as is aforesaid And if after he or she shall have received the said Sacrament as is aforesaid and after shall eftsoons at any time offend in not receiving the said Sacrament as is aforesaid by the space of one whole year that in every such Case the person so offending shall for every such offence lose and forfeit Threescore pounds of lawful English money the one moiety to be to our Soveraign Lord the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors and the other moiety to him that will sue for the same And to be recovered in any of the Kings Courts or Record at Westminster or before Iustices of Assize or general Goal delivery or before Iustices of the Peace at their general Quarter Sessions by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information wherein no Essoin Protection or wager of Law shall be allowed Popish Recusants Every Popish Recusant convicted Wingate tit Crowne numb 98. speaks indefinitely as if this extended to all Recusants whatsoever which is contrary to the express words of the Statute Conviction must be shewed in certain In an Information upon this Statute for not receiving the Sacrament the Conviction of the party for Recusancy ought to be shewed in certain before whom in what Court c. For before he is convicted of Recusancy he is not liable to the penalty inflicted by this Act for not receiving And yet if it be only generally shewed in the Information that the Defendant was convicted in due form of Law and the Defendant doth not demur thereto but pleads not guilty and it be found against him there Judgment shall not be stayed for this defect for he hath lost his advantage and by his Plea hath admitted the point of Conviction and at the Trial the only thing in issue was whether he had received the Sacrament and not whether he was convicted Tanfeild Chief Baron compared this Case to that of Debt upon an Obligation and in the Declaration no place is shewn That is not good But if the Defendant Pleads a Release he shall never afterwards take advantage of the Defect in the Declaration Cro. Hill 12. Jac. 365.366 Sivedale versus Sir Edward Lenthall Which shall hereafter conform him or her self Conformity generally shewed sufficient c. This conformity need not be set forth in the Information in every particular circumstance as when or before whom the Popish Recusant conformed himself For 't is sufficient if it be said that he went to Church and continued there during Divine Service and afterwards neglected to receive the Sacrament c. And upon such Conformity and neglect he is liable to the penalty inflicted by this Act although he never went before the Ordinary Ordinary Cro. Hill 12. Jac. 366. And for every year after for such not receiving thréescore pounds Note the Statute saith not that the Offender shall forfeit for the first second and third offence but for the first and second year and for every year after for if it had been said he should have forfeited Twenty pounds for the first offence Forty pounds for the second and Threescore pounds for the third he must have been convicted and have had Judgment of the first offence before he could have incurred the penalty for the second and of the second before he could have incurred the penalty for the third And every one of these offences must have appeared judicialiter which could not be ante Judicium But here where 't is said he shall forfeit Twenty pounds for the first year Forty pounds for the second and Threescore pounds for every year after it is otherwise And the Offender shall forfeit Threescore pounds for the third year although he was never convicted for the first or second year In an Information for the third year conviction for the first or second year not necessary And therefore in an Information brought upon this Statute for Threescore pounds against a Popish Recusant convicted for Recusancy who hath conformed and neglected to receive the Sacrament the third year after his Conformity It 's sufficient to set forth that he was a Popish Recusant and was convicted and conformed himself and went to Church c. two years before such a day and that after the said day he failed for a whole year to receive the Sacrament without mentioning what he did the first or second year after his conformity And so was the Information in
the Exchequer in the Case of Sir Edward Lenthal Cro. Hill 12 Jac. 365. Shall for every such offence lose and forfeit Thréescore pounds Receiving the Sacrament and neglecting it afterwards If a Popish Recusant once receive the Sacrament after his Conformity and afterwards neglect so to do within the time prescribed by this Act and is guilty of such neglect for two years together although he was never convicted for the first year yet an Information lies against him and he shall forfeit Threescore pounds for the second year For he is liable to pay so much for every offence that is for every year wherein he neglects to receive the Sacrament after he hath once received it The Informer may sue for any year and the Informer is at his liberty for which offence or year he will inform whether for the first second c. And the reason of this is because here are no steps or gradations to increase the penalty for the second or third offence but the penalty is equal and a like in this Case for every offence It is observable that the Popish Recusant who after his conformity receives the Sacrament and afterwards neglects so to do for the space of one or more years is in worse Condition then he who conforms and receives it not at all For in this last Case he shall forfeit but Twenty pounds for the first and Forty pounds for the second year But if he once receive the Sacrament and afterwards neglect it for the space of two years he shall forfeit for each of those years Threescore pounds To him that will sue for the same An Information upon this Branch of the Statute must be brought by an Informer Qui tam c. within a year after the offence or neglect Within what time he must sue or he can take no advantage thereof For such an Information is within the Statute of 31 Eliz. cap. 5. Stat. 31 Eliz. 5 Cro. Hill 12 Jac. 366. Vide Statute 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 9. Before whom a Common Informer cannot sue Or before Iustices of Assize c. Note that notwithstanding these words an Information on this Statute by an Informer Qui tam c. for not receiving the Sacrament cannot be brought before Justices of Assize or Goal delivery or Justices of Peace For no Common Informer can sue for the King and himself before any of those Justices but must sue in one of the Courts of Record at Westminster as was resolved Mich. 4. Car. 1. Jones 193. Vide Stat. 23. Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Sect. 9. Stat. Sect. 3. Presenting the monthly absence from Church of a Recusant And be it further Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That the Churchwardens and Constables of every Town Parish or Chappel for the time being or some one of them or if there be none such then the chief Constables of the Hundred where such Town Parish or Chappel is or shall be or one of them as well in places exempt as not exempt shall once in every year present the monthly absence from Church of all and all manner of Popish Recusants within such Towns and Parishes and shall present the names of every of the Children of the said Recusants being of the age of nine years and upwards abiding with their said Parents and as near as they can the age of every of the said Children A Recusants Children and Servants as also the names of the Servants of such Recusants at the general or Quarter Sessions of that Shire limit division or liberty Of all and all manner of Popish Recusants Whose monthly absence from Church must be presented and whose not As this Act is penned it seems that the Churchwardens and Constables are not bound thereby to present the monthly absence from Church of any of the Children or Servants of a Popish Recusant although such Children or Servants be Recusants unless they are Popish Recusants And that 't is sufficient to satisfie the Statute to present their names without taking any notice of their absence from Church But if they be Popish Recusants they fall within the general words of the Act and their monthly absence ought to be presented as well as that of their Parents or Masters Wingate in his Abridgment of this Statute tit Crown numb 100. hath clearly mistaken the meaning thereof in this particular for he tells us that the monthly absence of all the Children and Servants of a Popish Recusant ought to be presented At the general or Quarter Sessions General or Quarter Sessions Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 What is meant by those words vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 7. And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 4. The presentments recorded That all such presentments shall be accepted entred and recorded in the said Sessions by the Clerk of the Peace or Town-Clerk for the time being or his Deputy without any Fée to be had asked or taken for the same And in default of such presentment to be made the said Churchwardens Constables or High Constables respectively shall for every such default forfeit twenty shillings And in default of such accepting entring and recording without Feé as aforesaid the said Clerk of the Peace or Town-Clerk shall for every such Offence forfeit and lose forty shillings And that upon every Presentment of such monthly absence as aforesaid The reward of the Church-wardens and Constables whereupon such party so presented shall after happen to be Indicted and Convicted not being for the same absence before presented Then the said Churchwardens Constables or High Constables respectively so making such Presentments shall have a reward of forty shillings to be levied out of the Recusants Goods and Estate in such manner and form as by the more part of the said Iustices shall be by Warrant under their Hands and Seals then and there ordered and appointed Stat. Sâ—ct 5. What Justices shall hear and determin these Offences And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That the Iustices of Assize and Goal delivery at their Assizes and the said Iustices of Peace at their said Sessions shall have Power and Authority by virtue of this Act to enquire hear and determine of all Recusants and Offences as well for not receiving the Sacrament aforesaid according to the true meaning of this Law as for not repairing to Church according to the meaning of former Laws in such manner and form as the said Iustices of Assize and Goal delivery do or may now do by former Laws in the Case of Recusancy for not repairing to Church And also shall have power at their Assizes and Goal delivery and at the Sessions in which any Indictment against any person either for not repairing to Church according to former Laws or not receiving the said Sacrament according to this Law The effect of the Proclamation shall be taken to make Proclamation By
although he be there personally present and openly confess himself to be the same person who was Indicted and against whom the Proclamation issued yet if he deny to appear upon the Proclamation or to consent that his appearance be entred of Record it seems that his appearance cannot be Recorded but his default shall and he shall stand Convicted thereupon And this is no more an appearance then where a Prisoner is brought to the Common Pleas Bar by habeas Corpus to the intent to have him appear to an Original brought against him and he denies to appear to the Action in which Case his appearance cannot be Recorded as was resolved in Ascoughs Case 43 Eliz. Gouldsborough 118. Shall be as sufficient a conviction in Law That is a Recusant thus Convicted upon Proclamation and Default of appearance shall be in the same Condition as if he were convicted by Verdict but no Judgment is given Bridgman 122. Parker versus Webb But this Conviction upon Proclamation is no Judgment as was resolved in Doctor Fosters Case Co. 11.65 Conviction upon Proclamation no Judgment And although it shall make the Recusant liable to the several forfeitures penalties and incapacities inflicted on Recusants convict yet it shall not operate as a judgment as hath been already shewed in divers instances For this reason it hath been questioned whether if a Recusant be Convicted upon Indictment and Proclamation the King may not wave his advantage of this Conviction and bring his Action of Debt given him by the Statute of 35 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 35 Eliz. 1 For that such Conviction is no Judgment and consequently ought not to bind the King as a Judgment against the Recusant should have done Palmer 40.41 Sir John Webbs Case Worsley obtained a Patent to have all the Penalties of Recusants convict Although such a Patent was illegal for that the King cannot grant the penalty of a penal Law to a Subject for which Vide Rolles 1.10 C. 11. Roy versus Tollin Hobart 155. Colt Glover versus the Bishop of Coventry and Litchfield Ib. 183. Davison versus Barber yet admitting the Patent to be good The King cannot grant the forfeiture on a penal Law it was resolved that the penalties of Recusants convicted by Proclamation should not pass by those general words Rolles 1. 94 95. C. 41. Doctor Fosters Case And be it further Enacted Stat. Sect. 6. The penalty of a convicted Recusant That every offender in not repairing to Divine Service but forbearing the same contrary to the Statutes in that behalf made and provided that hereafter shall fortune to be thereof once convicted shall in such of the Terms of Easter and Michaelmas as shall be next after such Conviction pay into the Receipt of the Exchequer after the rate of Twenty pounds for every month which shall be contained in the Indictment whereupon such conviction shall be And shall also for every month after such Conviction without any other Indictment or Conviction forfeit Twenty pounds and pay into the Receipt of the Excheqver aforesaid at two times in the year that is to say in every Easter and Michaelmas Term as much as then shall remain unpaid after the rate of Twenty pounds for every month after such Conviction except in such Cases where the King shall and may by force of this Act refuse the same and take two parts of the Lands Tenements Hereditaments Leases and Farms of such Offender till the said party being Indicted for not coming to Church contrary to former Laws shall conform himself and come to Church according to the meaning of the Statute in that behalf made and provided What Convictions are here meant Once Convicted This extends to all Convictions whatsoever upon Indictment whether by Verdict Confession c. whereupon Judgment is given as well as to Convictions upon Proclamation and default And the penalty of Twenty pounds per month shall in any of the said Cases run on forever after and be appropriated to the King Stat. 29 Eliz. 6 Vide Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 4. In what Term the forfeiture is to be paid In such of the Terms of Easter and Michaelmas as shall be next after such conviction Here Easter and Michaelmas is to be taken disjunctively for Easter or Michaelmas as it is in the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 4. For the meaning is not that the Recusant shall have both of the Terms of Easter and Mithaelmas next after his Conviction wherein to pay the forfeiture of Twenty pounds for every month contained in the Indictment But he ought to pay the whole into the Exchequer the next Easter or Michaelmas Term which shall first happen after his Conviction And therefore if he be convicted in February he ought to pay the whole the next Easter Term unless where the King chooses to seize the two thirds of his Lands by force of this Statute as was admitted in the Case of Standen and the University of Oxford Hill 20 Jac. Jones 24. 25. And in the Lady Webbs Case who was convicted in March the pleading was that in the Easter Term then next following the said Katherine did not pay into the Exchequer according to the rate of 20 l. per month without any mention of Michaelmas Term Bridgman Pasch 16 Jac. 121. For every month after such Conviction By this Clause and that of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 4. 29 Eliz. 6. Penalty appropriated to the King to the same purpose after the Recusant is once Convicted the penalty of Twenty pounds per month shall run on without any new Indictment or Conviction and shall be for ever afterwards appropriated to the King alone and paid into the Exchequer so that the Informer cannot bring any popular Action or Information for the Twenty pounds per month Informer barred for any time incurred after such Conviction but is utterly barred Co. 11.61 Doctor Fosters Case Rolles 1. 93. C. 41. the same Case Owen 37. Sulherd and Evererds Case The Lady Webb was Indicted and Convicted of Recusancy upon Proclamation and default of appearance Whether barred in the Case of a Feme Covert and afterwards an Informer Qui tam c. sued her and her Husband for a new offence of Recusancy in the Wife subsequent to such Conviction to which they both pleaded the said Conviction at the Kings Suit The question was whether the Informer should be barred by this Plea or whether the Information was maintainable notwithstanding such former Conviction of the Wife for that the Wife seems not to be such an Offender as is here intended because she can have no Goods or Lands during the Husbands life which may be seized for non-payment of the penalty But it was granted on all hands that if she had been a Feme sole this had been a good Plea in bar of the Informers popular Suit for then she had been bound to pay the Twenty pounds per month into the Exchequer and
presentment as a profit of the Advowson which is parcel of the Mannor Moore ibid. The Recusant may plead collateral matter Or other defect whatsoever This is meant of defects within the Indictment or other proceedings and not of any collateral matter which the Recusant hath to discharge himself as a Pardon auterfoits convict c. For the Recusant is not hereby disabled to plead such collateral matter but may take advantage thereof Co. 11. 65. Dr. Fosters Case Nor yet is this meant of all defects whatsoever within the Indictment or other proceedings For if there be any defect Defects to the Kings prejudice which apparently tends to the Kings prejudice the Recusant may take advantage of it And therefore in the Case of the Marquess of Winchester who was Indicted and Convicted of Recusancy and had Judgment thereupon but ideo capiatur was omitted the Judgment was reversed for that omission Cro. Trin. 14 Car. 504 505. Provided always That if any person or persons Stat. Sect. 14. He that Conforms may avoid an Indictment or other proceedings so Indicted or to be Indicted shall at any time hereafter submit and conform him or her self and become Obedient to the Laws of the Church of England and repair to the Parish Church of his or her most abiding and if there be none such then to the Church next adjoyning to his or her such dwelling and there hear Divine Service according to the true meaning of the Statute in that behalf made and provided and there publickly receive the said Sacrament according to the Laws of this Realm of England now established That then every such person and persons so Indicted shall and may from thenceforth be admitted and allowed to avoid discharge reverse and undo the said Indictment and Indictments and all procéedings thereupon in such manner and form as if this present Act had not beén had nor made Any thing herein contained to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding And forasmuch as it is found by late experience Stat. Sect. 15. That such as go voluntarily out of this Realm of England to serve Forreign Princes States or Potentates are for the most part perverted in their Religion and Loyalty by Iesuits and Fugitives with whom they do there converse Be it therefore Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That every Subject of this Realm that after the Tenth day of June next coming shall go or pass out of this Realm to serve any Forreign Prince State or Potentate or shall after the said Tenth day of June pass over the Seas He shall take the Oath which goeth out of the Realm to serve another Prince and there shall voluntarily serve any such Forreign Prince State or Potentate not having before his or their going or passing as aforesaid taken the Oath aforesaid before the Officer hereafter appointed shall be a Felon And that if any Gentleman or person of higher degrée or any person or persons which hath born or shall bear any Office or place of Captain Lieutenant or any other place Certain persons to be bound to the King charge or Office in Camp Army or Company of Soldiers or Conducter of Soldiers shall after go or pass voluntarily out of this Realm to serve any such Forreign Prince State or Potentate or shall voluntarily serve any such Prince State or Potentate before that he and they shall become bound by Obligation with two such sureties as shall be allowed of by the Officers which are hereafter by this Act limited to take the same Bond unto our Soveraign Lord the Kings Majesty his Heirs or Successors in the sum of twenty pounds of currant English money at the least with Condition to the effect following shall be a Felon Subject of this Realm Every Subject of this Realm What is meant by a Subject of this Realm vide postea Sect. 23. Service Shall go or pass out of this Realm to serve The Service mentioned throughout this branch of the Statute is intended of civil or domestick Service as well as Military Co. 3. Inst. 80. and although the later part of it speaks of Officers and Soldiers yet it also speaks there of Gentlemen and persons of higher Degree without pointing at any particular sort of Service so that to serve or go to serve a Forreign Prince c. in any capacity whatsoever without first doing what is here required is Felony by this Act. Felony though the party serve not The passing or going out of this Realm to serve a Forreign Prince c. without taking the Oath or if of that quality entring into Bond is Felony by this Statute although the party be never received into actual Service For the words are in the disjunctive go or pass to serve or voluntarily serve Co. 3. Inst 80. Or intended not to serve Or shall c. pass over the Seas and there shall voluntarily serve So if he pass over the Seas upon some other occasion and not with an intent to serve a Forreign Prince c. yet if when he is there he voluntarily serve him and did not before his departing hence take the Oath and if of that quality enter into such Bond he shall incur the penalty of this Law and suffer as a Felon Co. 3. Inst 81. Bond must be Domino Regi Shall become bound by Obligation c. unto our Soveraign Lord the Kings Majesty An Obligation made to the Kings use is not sufficient nor will satisfie the intent of the Act but it must be made to the King himself For the Bond must be Domino Regi according to the Statute of 33 H. 8. cap. 39. Stat. 33 H. 8. 39 or the Officer who takes it is liable to Imprisonment for taking a Bond contrary to that Statute Wingate therefore tit Crown numb 112. lays a snare for the Officer of the Port when he directs him only to take this Bond to the Kings use And he might have informed himself out of that Statute of 33. and the Statute of 24 H. 8. cap. 8. of the difference between a Bond made to the King and a Bond made to the Kings use Vide Savile 13. C. 33. Shall be a Felon The Offender against any part of this branch of the Statute may have the benefit of his Clergy Clergy Co. 3. Inst 81. Vide postea Sect. 28. The tenor of which Condition followeth viz. Stat. Sect. 16. The Condition of the Bond. That if the within bounden c. shall not any time then after be reconciled to the Pope or See of Rome nor shall enter into or consent unto any practice Plot or Conspiracy whatsoever against the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors or any his and their Estate and Estates Realms or Dominions but shall within convenient time after knowledge thereof had reveal and disclose to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors or some of the Lords of his or their Honourable Privy Council all such Practices Plots and
or Constitution of man Naturalization being but a fiction in Law which confers the priviledges of a natural Subject but cannot make him a natural Subject who was none before For then he would have two natural Princes one where he was born and the other where Naturalized Vaughan 279 280. 283. Craw versus Ramsey Co. 7. 5 6 7. 25. Calvins Case Dyer 3 4 Ph. Mar. 145. Hobart 171. Curteenes Case so that to absolve perswade withdraw or reconcile an Alien born whose Subjection to the King began not with his birth or for any such to be absolved perswaded withdrawn or reconciled seems not to be Treason within this Act. But this Subjection is not to be understood locally Subjection not to be understood locally or in respect of the place of a mans Birth but in respect of the Prince to whom Subjection is due at the time of his Birth And therefore if a Scot or Irishman be absolved or reconciled in England although the Offence be committed in another Kingdom then that where his Subjection begun yet being born a Subject to the King of England its Treason in the absolver or person reconciling and in him that is absolved or reconciled Nor is it necessary in all Cases that the party be born in the Kings Dominions but that he may be a natural Subject notwithstanding and consequently within this Act as in the Case of an Embassador vide Co. 7. 18. Calvins Case Vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Sect. 2. Stat. Sect. 20. A reconciled person taking the Oath Provided nevertheless That the last mentioned Clause of this Branch or any thing therein contained shall not extend or be taken to extend to any person or persons whatsoever which shall hereafter be reconciled to the Pope or Sée of Rome as aforesaid for and touching the point of so being reconciled only that shall return into this Realm and thereupon within six days next after such return before the Bishop of the Diocess or two Iustices of Peace joyntly or severally of the County where he shall arrive submit himself to his Majesty and his Laws and take the Oath set forth by Act in the first year of the Reign of the late Quéen Elizabeth commonly called the Oath of Supremacy as also the Oath before set down in this present Act which said Oaths the said Bishop and Iustices respectively shall have Power and Authority by this present Act to minister to such persons as aforesaid And the said Oaths so taken the said Bishop and Iustices before whom such Oaths shall be so taken respectively shall certifie at the next General or Quarter Sessions of the Peace to be holden within the said Shire Limit Division or Liberty wherein such person as aforesaid shall submit himself and take the said Oaths as aforesaid upon pain of every one neglecting to certifie the same as aforesaid the sum of Forty pounds Submission in case of Treason Which shall hereafter be reconciled In the late Additions to Dalton cap. 140. tit High Treason Sect. 12. is intimated that this Clause which provides in Case of Submission extends to no Cases of Treason or Misprision of Treason for there in reciting this part of the Statute the Cases of Treason and Misprision of Treason are excepted which is a great mistake For the Submission here spoken of is only in the Case of a declared Treason scil being reconciled to the Pope or See of Rome For and touching the point of so being reconciled only In the latter part of the former Section there are three several sorts of Offences made Treason Reconciled to the Pope c. what meant thereby 1. To be willingly absolved or withdrawn from a mans natural Obedience 2. To be willingly reconciled to the Pope or See of Rome 3. To promise Obedience to any pretended Authority of that See or to any other Prince State or Potentate but in this Clause only the second of these Offences is remitted in Case of Submission viz. the being reconciled to the Pope or Sée of Rome By which I conceive to be meant the forsaking of the Religion established by Law and embracing that which is professed and maintained by the Pope and See of Rome And in that sense those words are commonly taken at this day And that this is the meaning of those words appears by the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. which makes it Treason to absolve or withdraw the Subjects from their natural Obedience or to withdraw them from the Religion Established to the Romish Religion or to move them to promise Obedience to the See of Rome or any other Prince c. to answer which follows in that Act three other sorts of Treason viz. to be absolved or withdrawn or to be reconciled or to promise such Obedience so that the Offence of being reconciled answers to the Offence of withdrawing the Subjects from the Religion Established to the Romish Religion which explains what is meant by such Reconciliation viz. the being so withdrawn from the one Religion to the other But by this Clause if a person be thus reconciled that is change his Religion and become a Papist yet if he be capacitated to submit as is required by this Act and submit accordingly and take the Oaths of Supremacy and Allegiance such Offence of being reconciled shall not be Treason But as for being absolved or withdrawn from his natural Obedience Offences not within this Proviso or promising Obedience to the pretended Authority of the See of Rome or any other Prince State or Potentate besides his natural King such Submission and taking the Oaths shall not absolve him from that guilt but he shall have Judgment and suffer for the same as in Case of High Treason notwithstanding such Submission c. Dalton V. cap. 89. tit High Treason is therefore clearly mistaken in extending the benefit of this Submission c. generally to all who have been willingly absolved withdrawn or reconciled or have promised such Obedience Submit himself to his Majesty and his Laws The Kings Laws Stat. 27 Eliz. 2 What Laws are here meant vide Stat. 27 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 7. Stat. Sect. 21. Where the Trial shall be And be it further Enacted That all and every person and persons that shall offend contrary to this present branch of this Statute shall be Indicted tried and proceéded against by and before the Iustices of Assize and Goal delivery of that County for the time being or before the Iustices of the Court of Kings Bench and be there procéeded against according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm against Traitors as if the said Offence had béen committed in the same County where such person or persons shall be so taken Any Law Custom or Statute to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding In what County The Offender may be proceeded against by force of this Act in any County where he shall be imprisoned for
Peace is sole Judge whether the excuse Excuse the party makes for his absence be sufficient and sufficiently proved And the same cannot be brought into question elsewhere by the party To levy twelve pence for every such default So that this Forfeiture of twelve pence may be levied weekly For it is due for every absence as soon as the Sunday is ended and hath no relation to the forfeiture of twenty pounds per month given by the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Recusants may forfeit the twelve pence and twenty pounds both But the Offender may be punished both by this Act for his weekly absence and by 23 Eliz. for his monthly absence By Coke Chief Justice B. R. Rolles 1. 94. Dr. Fosters Case And because in one Act of Parliament begun and holden at Westminster in the five and thirtieth year of the late Quéen Eliz. Stat. Sect. 24. A Repeal of two branches of the Statute of 35 Eliz. 1. Intituled An Act to retain the Quéens Majesties Subjects in their due Obedience there are two branches contained the first beginning thus And for that every person having House and Family is in duty bounden to have especial regard of the good government and ordering of the same and so forth to the next Clause beginning thus Provided nevertheless That this Act shall not in any wise extend to punish or impeach any persons for relieving c. ending with these words Any thing in this Act contained to the contrary notwithstanding Which said two Branches or Clauses are found defective Be it therefore Enacted That the said two Branches or Clauses of the said Act and no more shall be by Authority of this present Parliament utterly repealed and made void Vide Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 7. Stat. 35 Eliz. 1 And in lieu thereof Be it Enacted Stat. Sect. 25. Maintaining or keeping a Recusant in his house that every person and persons which after one month next after the end of this present Session of Parliament shall willingly maintain retain relieve kéep or harbour in his or their House any Servant Sojourner or Stranger who shall not go to or repair to some Church or Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer to hear Divine Service but shall forbear the same by the space of one month together not having a reasonable Excuse contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm shall forfeit ten pounds for every month that he she or they shall so relieve maintain retain keép or harbour any such Servant Sojourner or Estranger in his or their House so forbearing as aforesaid And that every person Retaining a Recusant in his Service fee or livery which shall within the time aforesaid retain or kéep in his her or their service fée or livery any person or persons which shall not go to or repair to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer to hear Divine Service but shall forbear the same by the space of one month together shall forfeit for every month he she or they shall so retain kéep or continue in his or their service fée or livery any such person or persons so forbearing as aforesaid knowing the same ten pounds the same penalties to be recovered and employed in manner and form hereafter following Willingly c. kéep or harbour Master where not punishable A man freely and of his own accord takes an Apprentice or Covenant Servant for a certain time not knowing him or her to be a Recusant and such Apprentice or Servant forbears to come to Church It seems that the Master shall forfeit nothing although he keeps them in his House For he doth no more then what the Law will compel him to during the time agreed on and limited for such Apprentiship or Service and this cannot be said to be done willingly for 't is not in his choice to discharge them until the time is expired Where punishable But if the Master before he took such Apprentice or other Servant knew him or her to be a Recusant or after their forbearance to come to Church retains them for a longer time then was at first agreed on this is a keeping or harbouring them willingly and he shall be liable to this penalty In his her or their service Fée or Livery This extends to all Servants whatsoever although they dwell not in the Masters House nor are his menial Servants for if they are retained in his Service Fee or Livery as Bailiff Steward or in any other capacity and forbear to come to Church the Master shall be punished for their absence Penalty Ten pounds Note in the late additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 27. The penalty upon this Branch of the Act is mistaken and said to be in some Cases Twenty pounds per month and in other Cases One hundred pounds per month The contrary whereof is evident Stat. Sect. 26. The Father Mother Ward and Person committed by Authority Provided nevertheless That this Act shall not in any wise extend to punish or impeach any person or persons for maintaining retaining relieving keeping or harbouring his her or their Father or Mother wanting without fraud or Covin other habitation or sufficient maintenance or the Ward of any such person or any person that shall be committed by Authority to the custody of any by whom they shall be so relieved maintained or kept Any thing in this Act contained to the contrary notwithstanding Child where punishable Wanting without fraud or Covin other habitation or sufficient maintenance A Father or Mother hath no setled habitation but yet hath sufficient maintenance The Child receives such parent into his House who forbears to come to Church in this Case the Child shall forfeit Ten pounds per month For although the Parent had no habitation yet this is not a wanting habitation within the meaning of this Act seeing he wanted not sufficient means to procure one Where not But if the Parent hath an habitation yet if he want sufficient maintenance to keep him in that habitation although he refuse to come to Church the Child shall forfeit nothing for receiving him into his House for the words here are in the disjunctive and if the Parent wants either other habitation in the sense of the Act or sufficient maintenance the Child may receive him That shall be committed by Authority to the custody c. Master where not punishable The former Case of an Apprentice was put only of such an one whom the Master takes of his own accord but if it be a Parish Child bound by the Churchwardens and Overseers with the assent of the Justices of Peace if the Master be duly required to take him such Apprentice as it seems is committed to the Masters custody within the meaning of this Proviso for he is punishable if he refuse him and if he were a Recusant or forbear to come to Church yet the Master
of Law shall be allowed Stat. Sect. 4. Popish Recusants shall depart from London And that all Popish Recusants Indicted or Convicted and all other persons which have not repaired to some usuall Church or Chappel and there heard Divine Service but have forborn the same by the space of thrée months last past contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm dwelling abiding or remaining within the City of London or the Liberties thereof or within ten miles of the said City shall within thrée months next after the end of this Session of Parliament depart from the said City of London and ten miles Compass of the same and also shall deliver up their names to the Lord Mayor of London in case such Recusant do dwell or remain within the said City of London or the Liberties thereof And in case the said Recusant shall dwell or remain in any other County within Ten miles of the same City Then the said Recusant shall deliver up his or her name to the next Iustice of Peace within such County where the said Recusant shall so dwell or remain within forty days after the end of this Session of Parliament upon pain that every person offending herein shall forfeit to our Soveraign Lord the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors the sum of One hundred pounds The one moiety whereof shall be to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors the other moiety to him or them that will sue for the same by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoign Protection or wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed Stat. Sect. 5. And that all Popish Recusants which shall hereafter come dwell or remain within the said City of London or the Liberties thereof or within ten miles of the said City which now are or hereafter shall be Indicted or Convicted of such Recusancy or which shall at any time hereafter not repair unto some Church or Chappel and there hear Divine Service but shall forbear the same by the space of threé months contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm shall within ten dayes after such Indictment or Conviction depart from the said City of London and ten miles Compass of the same and also shall deliver up their names to the Lord Mayor of London for the time being in Case such Recusant shall dwell or remain within the said City of London or the Liberties thereof And in Case the said Recusant shall dwell or remain in any other County within ten miles of the said City then the said Recusant shall deliver up his or her name to the next Iustice of Peace within such County where the said Recusant shall so dwell or remain within the said ten days next after such Indictment or Conviction upon pain that every person offending herein shall likewise forfeit to our said Soveraign Lord the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors the like sum of an hundred pounds The one moiety whereof shall be to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors and the other to him or them that will sue for the same by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoign protection or wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed In the late Additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 45. this Clause is otherwise recited viz. That the Recusant Delivery up of the Recusants name if he live within ten miles distance of London is to deliver up his name to the Lord Mayor there and if he live above ten miles distance then to the next Justice of Peace But the Statute is there mistaken in both points For if the Recusant dwell within ten miles of London and not in London he is to deliver up his name to the next Justice of Peace and not to the Lord Mayor And if he dwell above ten miles from London he is not within this Act nor bound by force thereof to deliver up his name at all For miles Vide Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 2. Provided always Stat. Sect. 6. Tradesmen and dwellers in or about London That such person or persons as now use any Trade mystery or manual Occupation within the said City of London or within ten miles of the same and such as have or shall have their only dwelling within the said City or ten miles Compass of the same not having any other dwelling or place of abode elsewhere shall or may remain and continue in such place within the said City or ten miles of the same as they have dwelled inhabited or remained in by the space of thrée months next before this present Session of Parliament Any thing herein contained to the contrary notwithstanding This Proviso is by some taken to be in force at this day At this day not excepted But yet under favour as the Proviso is penned it seems to the contrary and that now all Popish Recusants Convicted or Indicted of Recusancy or not repairing to Church but forbearing by the space of three months are by this Act to depart London and ten miles compass of the same notwithstanding they are Tradesmen or have no other place of dwelling For as to Tradesmen here are no other excepted then such as when this Act was made used some Trade Mystery or manual Occupation And as to both Tradesmen and such as had or should have their only dwelling within London or ten miles compass the Statute limits them to that place where they inhabited three months next before that Session of Parliament wherein this Act was made which cannot by any strained construction extend to those in future times But the meaning seems to be That Popish Recusants Indicted or Convicted of Recusancy or not repairing to Church c. who were then Tradesmen within London or ten miles compass or such as then resided within London or ten miles compass and should have no other place of abode might continue there so that they removed not to any other dwelling then where they inhabited by the space of three months next before that Session of Parliament or if they did they were to lose the benefit of this Proviso and must have removed above ten miles from London as well as other Popish Recusants Convicted or Indicted or not repairing to Church as aforesaid As for those words such as shall have their only dwelling within the said City c. the future Tense shall have doth not intend such Recusants as should have their dwelling there or within ten miles compass after the making of this Act and not before But only such who having their dwelling there before that Session of Parliament should at the time of their being Indicted or Convicted have their only dwelling there and no other place of dwelling elsewhere For if they had at such time of their being Convicted or Indicted two several Houses one within London or ten miles and the other at
the person Co. 1. Inst 128. Plea in disability is peremptory The Defendant in Debt upon an Obligation pleads that the Plaintiff is a Popish Recusant Convict who replies nul tiel Record Such Plea in disability of the person is peremptory and nul tiel Record is an Issue and Judgment shall be given against the Defendant upon failer of the Record Hetley 18. But yet if there be a Plea of a Conviction of Recusancy had before Justices of Gaol delivery and the Defendant mistakes and takes out a Certiorari Certiorari to the Justices of Peace this shall not be a failer of the Record Failer of Record although the Defendant hath it not at the day For that the issuing of the Certiorari was the Award of the Court But a Certiorari shall be awarded de novo to the Justices of Gaol delivery before whom the Plaintiff was convicted Hobart 135. Pye against Thrill Note if the Defendant be sued in the Common Pleas or any other of the principal Courts at Westminster and he plead a Conviction of Recusancy before Justices of Gaol delivery or Justices of Peace he need not take his Certiorari Certiorari out of what Court out of the Chancery and so bring it by Mittimus But the Court may send a Certiorari immediately to that inferiour Court where the Plaintiff was convicted as was held in that Case of Pye and Thrill vide 19 H. 6. 19. And the Justices themselves And by whom before whom the Conviction was had must certifie and therefore if the Conviction was before Justices of Peace the Certificate cannot be by the Custos Rotulorum Custos rotulorum alone though he keep the Records for the Certiorari is in such Case directed to the Justices of Peace Hobart 135. A Popish Recusant is convicted of Recusancy in a popular Suit and after such Conviction sues the Informer Qui tam c. Who may take advantage of this disability Informer upon some other matter or cause of Action arising between them Quaere whether the Defendant may plead such Conviction in disability of the Recusant For this Conviction disables the Recusant to sue as if he were excommunicated and no otherwise Now if a Bishop Excommunicate any one and the Bishop Bishop be afterwards sued at Law for any other matter or cause by the person so excommunicated the Bishop cannot plead this Excommunication in disability of the Plaintiff who sues him Co. 1. Inst 134. Swinborne Part 5. Sect. 6. p. 305. And the reason given for this in Trollops Case Co. 8. 68. is because the Bishop was a party to the Excommunication and therefore shall take no advantage by it which reason seems to hold likewise in the Case of an Informer Qui tam c. who is a party to the Conviction of the Recusant upon the popular Suit which Conviction renders the Recusant disabled to all intents as an Excommunicant person And therefore he being a party to it by the same Rule shall not take advantage of it in disability of the Recusant in any Action brought by the Recusant against him But yet notwithstanding I conceive the Informer Qui tam c. at whose Suit the Recusant was convicted may well take advantage of this Conviction and plead it in disability of the person of the Recusant And that the true reason why the Bishop shall not be admitted to plead an Excommunication pronounced by himself in disability of the person Excommunicated is not because he is a party to the Excommunication but because in matters of Excommunication the Bishop acts as a Judge and 't is by his Sentence and Authority that the party is Excommunicated and he shall not take advantage in another Suit of a Sentence given by himself judicially And this will not hold in the Case of an Informer who though he be a party to the Suit in which the Recusant is disabled as an Excommunicate person yet is no Judge in the Case whether the party Sued shall be disabled or no as the Bishop is in the other Case where the party is actually Excommunicated by him And if the Bishop should be barred to Plead and take advantage of such Excommunication because he is a party thereunto it would follow that the person who Sues in the Spiritual Court and at whose instance the person Sued is Excommunicated should be barred likewise to take advantage of such disability in the Plaintiff at Law for he is a party to the Excommunication for that he is a party to the Suit upon which the Excommunication is originally founded But the contrary to this is strongly implied in 14 H. 4. 14. where the Case was A. was Excommunicated in a Suit depending between him and B. and afterwards A. Sues B. upon the Statute of Praemunire who pleads this Excommunication in disability of the Plaintiff Here the Plea was disallowed because the principal Suit on which the Excommunication depended was brought before the Pope But in the debate of the Case there was not the least word of exception to the Plea upon this ground because the Excommunication was at the instance of the Defendant or that the Defendant should not take advantage of the Plaintiffs disability for that he was a party to the Excommunication which disabled him Executor or Administrator disabled If an Executor or Administrator becomes a Popish Recusant convict it seems he is disabled by this Act to Sue in either of those Capacities For the Act saith He shall be disabled to all intents as an Excommunicate person Now a person actually Excommunicated cannot Sue as Executor or Administrator as is held in 21 E. 4. 49. 21 H. 6. 30. 14 H. 6. 15. Co. 1. Inst 134. Although there are some opinions to the contrary Vide Finch 27. Stat. Sect. 13. What Suits a Popish Recusant may prosecute Provided nevertheless That it shall and may be lawful for any such person so disabled for and notwithstanding any thing in this Law contained to sue or prosecute an Action or Suit for or concerning only such of his or her Lands Tenements Leases Rents Annuities and Hereditaments or for the Issues and Profits thereof which are not to be seized or taken into the Kings hands his Heirs or Successors by force of any Law for or concerning his or her Recusancy or any part thereof Which are not to be seized or taken into the Kings hands c. These words are not restrained to such Lands Lands seized into the Kings hands c. as cannot be seized into the Kings hands for Recusancy For then the Recusant could in no case Sue for more then the third part for that the King may if he please make his Election and seize the other two parts in lieu of the Twenty pounds per month But they are intended of all Lands c. of the Recusant which neither the King hath seized nor are by Law to be seized by vertue of any thing
happen it is good reason not to strain the words farther then they reach but to say it is casus omissus and that the Law intended quae frequentius accidunt Vaughan 373. And yet there is no question but such Lands are a Joynture The extent of the word and if made with the Wives assent before marriage shall bar her Dower by the Statute of 27 H. 8. cap. 10. which speaks of an Estate or purchase made to the Wife for her Joynture generally not saying by whom Mr. Sheapard therefore in his Epitome p. 523. falls very short of the full description of a Joynture when he limits it only to be of the Franktenement of her Husband which restriction dayly experience confutes For that it is commonly made by the Ancestor of the Husband of Lands in which the Husband never had any Franktenement nor perhaps ever shall have Custom By vertue of any custom of any County City or Place And not of Cities only as 't is restrained in the late additions to Dalton cap. 85. tit Recusants Sect. 48. Where in force The Custom here mentioned viz. that the Wife shall have a certain portion of her Husbands goods after his decease is of force throughout the whole Province of York and in divers other places of England and if he gives them away from her by his Will the bequest is void Vide Swinburne Part 3. cap. 14. p. 151. 152. What goods are not within the Act. A Woman is an offender within this Branch and her Husband by his last will gives her all or part of his goods not claimable by custom she is not by this Act disabled to enjoy them after his death For the words here are plainly restrictive to such goods as she claims by custom Where not Tenant by Curtesie not One hundred pounds forfeited Whereof he may be intituled to be Tenant by the Curtesie A Popish Recusant convicted marries an Inheritrix in other form then is appointed by this Act The Wife dies without issue born alive of the marriage In this Case although the Husband is not intituled to be Tenant by the Courtesie yet the possibility which he once had to be so intituled seems to satisfie the intent of the Act and he shall not forfeit the hundred pounds So that here is another Casus omissus For it may so happen that a Popish Recusant Convict may have a great Portion in money with his Wife and but a small Estate in Lands with her perchance but a few Acres yet if he be an Offender within this branch the Lands for that he may be intituled to be Tenant of them by the Courtesie shall save his hundred pounds and if his Wife die having had no issue born alive he is wholly exempted out of the Act and cannot be punished either way Stat. Sect. 16. Baptism of Popish Recusants Children And that every Popish Recusant which shall hereafter have any Child born shall within one month next after the Birth thereof cause the same Child to be baptized by a lawful Minister according to the Laws of this Realm in the open Church of the same Parish where the Child shall be born or in some other Church near adjoyning or Chappel where Baptism is usually administred or if by infirmity of the Child it cannot be brought co such place then the same shall within the time aforesaid be baptized by the lawful Minister of any of the said Parishes or places aforesaid upon pain that the Father of such Child if he be living by the space of one month next after the Birth of such Child or if he be dead within the said month then the Mother of such Child shall for every such Offence forfeit one hundred pounds of lawful money of England one third part whereof to be to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors one other third part to the Informer or him that will sue for the same and the other third part to the Poor of the said Parish to be recovered by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoign Protection or Wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed And if any Popish Recusant man or woman Stat. Sect. 17. Burial of Popish Recusants not excommunicate not being Excommunicate shall be buried in any place other than in the Church or Churchyard or not according to the Ecclesiastical Laws of this Realm That the Executors or Administrators of every such person so buried knowing the same or the party that causeth him to be so buried shall forfeit the sum of twenty pounds the one third part whereof shall be to our Soveraign Lord the King the other third part to the Informer or him or them that will sue for the same and the other third part to the Poor of the Parish where such person died to be recovered by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoign Protection or Wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed The Exception here of a Popish Recusant Excommunicate That is not actually Excommunicate is intended only of one actually Excommunicated and not of him who is a Popish Recusant convicted who shall not be reputed as a person Excommunicate to this intent but only as to the point of a disability as hath been said Sect. 12. So that if any Popish Recusant not actually Excommunicate be buried elsewhere or otherwise then is here mentioned although he were convicted yet 't is an Offence punishable by this Law And be it further Enacted by this present Parliament Stat. Sect. 18. Children departing the Realm That if the Children of any Subject within this Realm the said Children not being Soldiers Mariners Merchants or their Apprentices or Factors to prevent their good Education in England or for any other cause shall hereafter be sent or go beyond Seas without Licence of the Kings Majesty or six of his Honourable Privy Council whereof the principal Secretary to be one under their Hands and Seals The forfeiture of such as depart That then all and every such Child and Children so sent or which shall so go beyond the Seas shall take no benefit by any gift conveyance descent devise or otherwise of or to any Lands Tenements Hereditaments Leases Goods or Chattels until he or they being of the age of eighteén years or above take the Oath mentioned in an Act of Parliament made this present Session Intituled An Act for the better discovering and repressing of Popish Recusants before some Iustice of Peace of the County Liberty or Limit where such Parents of such Children as shall be so sent did or shall inherit and dwell And that in the mean time the next of his or her kin which shall be no Popish Recusant shall have and enjoy the said Lands Tenements Hereditaments Leases Goods and Chattels so given conveyed descended or devised until such time
such person as shall so conform him or her self as aforesaid Stat. Sect. 20. A Popish Recusant shall not Present to a Benefice nor grant the next avoidance c. And be it further Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That every person or persons that is or shall be a Popish Recusant Convict during the time that he shall be or remain a Recusant shall from and after the end of this present Session of Parliament be utterly disabled to present to any Benefice with cure or without cure Prebend or any other Ecclesiastical living or to collate or nominate to any Freé-school Hospital or Donative whatsoever and from the beginning of this present Session of Parliament shall likewise be disabled to grant any avoidance to any Benefice Prebend or other Ecclesiastical living And that the Chancellor and Schollers of the Vniversity of Oxford so often as any of them shall be void shall have the Presentation Nomination Collation and Donation of and to every such Benefice Prebend or Ecclesiastical Living School Hospital and Donative set lying and being in the Counties of Oxford Kent Middlesex Sussex Surrey Hampshire Berkshire Buckinghamshire Gloucestershire Worcestershire Staffordshire Warwickshire Wiltshire Somersetshire Devonshire Cornwall Dorsetshire Herefordshire Northamptonshire Pembrokeshire Carmarthenshire Brecknockshire Monmouthshire Cardiganshire Montgomeryshire the City of London and in every City and Town being a County of it self The Chancellor and Schollers of Oxford and Cambridge shall Present to a Popish Recusants Benefice c. lying and being within any of the Limits or Precincts of any of the Counties aforesaid or in or within any of them as shall happen to be void during such time as the Patron thereof shall be and remain a Recusant Convict as aforesaid And that the Chancellor and Schollers of the Vniversity of Cambridge shall have the Presentation Nomination Collation and Donation of and to every such Benefice Prebend or Ecclesiastical Living School Hospital and Donative set lying and being in the Counties of Essex Hartfordshire Bedfordshire Cambridgeshire Huntingtonshire Suffolk Norfolk Lincolnshire Rutlandshire Leicestershire Darbyshire Nottinghamshire Shropshire Cheshire Lancashire Yorkshire the County of Durham Northumberland Cumberland Westmerland Radnorshire Denbighshire Flintshire Carnarvonshire Angleseyshire Merionethshire Glamorganshire and in every City and Town being a County of it self lying within any of the Limits or Precincts of any of the Counties last before mentioned or in or within any of them as shall happen to be void during such time as the Patron thereof shall be and remain a Recusant Convict as aforesaid Provided None shall be presented who hath another Benefice with cure of Souls That neither of the said Chancellors and Schollers of either the said Vniversities shall present or nominate to any Benefice with Cure Prebend or other Ecclesiastical living any such person as shall then have any other Benefice with cure of Souls And if any such Presentation or Nomination shall be had or made of any such person so beneficed the said Presentation or Nomination shall be utterly void Any thing in this Act to the contrary notwithstanding Grant of the next avoidance where void From and after the end of this present Session of Parliament A man seized of an Advowson grants the next avoidance and then becomes a Popish Recusant Convict The grant of the next Avoidance is void and the University shall Present For the foregoing words during his Recusancy do not import the time when his disability shall begin but when it shall end viz. when he remains no longer a Recusant But when once he becomes a Popish Recusant Convict his disability shall have relation Relation to all the time going before scil from the end of that Session of Parliament wherein this Act was made Co. 10. 55 56. Case of the Chancellor c. of the University of Oxford Jones 20. Standen al' versus University d' Oxon Whitton Retrospects And such retrospects are usual in Acts of Parliament For which see the Cases cited in Co. 10. supra Recusancy by Covin And yet if after the Grant of the next Avoidance the Patron or Grantor becomes a Popish Recusant convict by Covin and to the intent to make void such his Grant this shall not defeat the interest of the Grantee but he may present when the Church becomes void notwithstanding such Conviction Jones 20. Averment Verdict But then the Covin must be averred by the Grantee and found by the Jury to be to that particular intent as in the Case herein after mentioned where the Recusant grants away the Advowson by Covin which vide postea A Recusant disabled to nominate Be utterly disabled to Present to any Benefice c. A man hath the right of nomination to a Benefice which is presentative and another hath the right of Presentation If he who hath the right of Nomination become a Popish Recusant Convict I conceive he is disabled by this Act to nominate For although only the word Present be here used as to a Benefice or Ecclesiastical living presentative yet this shall extend as well to Nomination For the intent of the Act is to prevent a Recusant from appointing who shall be Incumbent and the Case of Nomination is in equal mischief with that of Presentation And if the Recusant should not be disabled to Nominate as well as to Present the intent of the Act would be eluded For he that hath the right of Nomination is in effect the Patron and he that Presents at the Nomination of another is but as a Messenger between him and the Ordinary 14 H. 4. 11. And if he who is to Present Presents any other then the person nominated to him or doth not Present the person nominated he who nominates may bring a Quare Impedit against him And he who hath the Nomination must joyntly with him who hath the Presentation confirm the Lease of the Incumbent Moore 49. C. 147. Fitz. n. b. 33. 'T is true the general Rule is Penal Statues how expounded that penal Statutes shall not be taken by Equity from whence may be inferred that this Statute only disabling a Recusant to present to a Benefice presentative shall not be extended to disable him to nominate although it be within the same mischief but that Rule hath some exceptions and where the intent of the makers of the Law plainly appeares by other words in the same Statute a penal Statute shall be expounded largely and according to that intent beyond the Letter as in the Case of Simony upon the Statute of 31 Eliz. cap. 6. Stat. 31 Eliz. 6. Hobart 75. Now in the subsequent Clause touching the University the nomination as well as presentation is given to them and consequently the Recusant was intended to be disabled in the one Case as well as the other Besides the words disabled to present may be aptly enough expounded disabled to nominate Presentment in whom For the presentment is truly
perswades others so to do and not then neither unless he hath been absent from Church by the space of a month Where this Act extends to Popish Recusants Vnder colour or pretence of any exercise of Religion Although this Act is commonly called the Act against Sectaries as distinguished from those of the Romish profession yet in truth it extends to all Recusants whatsoever as well Popish as other except in the point of abjuration For the Popish service is performed under colour or pretence of exercise of Religion and the Assembly or Meeting of Popish Recusants under such colour or pretence is an Assembly or Meeting contrary to the Laws and Statutes And they as well as others may be Indicted upon this Statute if they forbear to come to Church for the space of a moneth and be present at any part of the Popish service or move or perswade ut supra And may be imprisoned without Bail until they conform and make submission as by this Act is appointed But they cannot be required to abjure unless they offend against the Statute of 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Stat. 35 Eliz. 2 A Popish Recusant is likewise subject to the Action of Debt c. given to the Queen by this Statute Being thereof lawfully convicted That is What conviction sufficient convicted both of his absence from Church and of that other Offence which makes him punishable by this Act viz. going to Conventicles or moving or perswading c. for his absence from Church for a month must be laid down precisely in the Indictment for without that the other is no Offence within this Act as hath been said And 't is not necessary that the party be convicted of such absence upon any Prior Indictment for although there was never any former conviction of him for Recusancy yet if he offend against this Act in any of the other particulars he may be convicted both of that Offence and of his absence upon one and the same Indictment And so was the Indictment in the Case of Lee and others who were Indicted upon this Statute at the Sessions of the Peace in Essex for absenting themselves for a month from Church and resorting to Conventicles To which they pleaded not guilty and the Indictment was removed into the Kings-Bench to be tried there Cro. Mich. 16 Car. 593. Trial. Provided always Stat. Sect. 2. An Offender not conforming himself abjure shall the Realm and be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any such person or persons which shall offend against this Act as aforesaid shall not within thrée months next after they shall be convicted for their said Offence conform themselves to the obedience of the Laws and Statutes of this Realm in coming to the Church to hear Divine Service and in making such publick Confession and Submission as hereafter in this Act is appointed and expressed being thereunto required by the Bishop of the Diocess or any Iustice of the Peace of the County where the same person shall happen to be or by the Minister or Curate of the Parish That in every such Case every such Offender being thereunto warned or required by any Iustice of the Peace of the same County where such Offenders shall then be shall upon his and their Corporal Oath before the Iustices of the Peace in the open Quarter Sessions of the same County or at the Assizes and Goal delivery of the same County before the Iustices of the same Assizes and Goal delivery abjure this Realm of England and all other the Queéns Majesties Dominions forever unless her Majesty shall licence the party to return And thereupon shall depart out of this Realm at such Haven or Port and within such time as shall in that behalf be assigned and appointed by the said Iustices before whom such abjuration shall be made unless the same Offender be letted or stayed by such lawful and reasonable means or causes as by the Common Laws of this Realm are permitted and allowed in Cases of abjuration for felony And in such cases of let or stay then within such reasonable and convenient time after as the Common Law requireth in Case of abjuration for Felony as is aforesaid And that the Iustices of Peace before whom any such abjuration shall happen to be made as is aforesaid shall cause the same presently to be entred of Record before them and shall certifie the same to the Iustices of Assizes and Goal delivery of the County at the next Assizes of Goal delivery to be holden in the same County In what case the offender is not bound to abjure Being thereunto required by the Bishop c. or any Iustice of the Peace c. But put the Case that the Offender is convicted and the Three months next after his Conviction elapse before he is required by the Bishop or any Justice of Peace or the Minister or Curate of the Parish to conform and make the submission here appointed and afterwards he is required by one of them so to do It seems in this Case such request comes too late for he ought to conform and submit within the three months if he be required but if he be not required he is not bound to abjure for omitting it although he shall remain in prison till he conforms and submits But if within the three months he be required to conform and submit and refuse there is no question but he may be at any time afterwards warned or required to abjure Abjuration Abjure this Realm of England c. Vide Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 6. Stat. Sect. 3. The punishment for refusing to abjure not departing or returning without Licence And if any such Offender which by the tenor and intent of this Act is to be abjured as is aforesaid shall refuse to make Abjuration as is aforesaid or after such Abjuration made shall not go to such Haven and within such time as is before appointed and from thence depart out of this Realm according to this present Act or after such his departure shall return or come again into any her Majesties Realms or Dominions without her Majesties special Licence in that behalf first had and obtained That then in every such Case the person so offending shall be adjudged a Felon and shall suffer as in Case of Felony without benefit of Clergy Vide Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 7. Stat. 35 Eliâ— â— And furthermore be it Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament Stat. Sâ—ct 4. An Offender shall be discharged upon his open submission That if any person or persons that shall at any time hereafter offend against this Act shall before he or they be so warned or required to make Abjuration according to the tenor of this Act repair to some Parish Church on some Sunday or other Festival day and then and there hear Divine Service And at Service time before the Sermon or reading of the Gospel make
so the word taken is to be expounded and the like Exposition hath been made of the Statutes of 2 3 E. 6. cap. 2. of Soldiers and 1 Jac. cap. 11. of having two Wives living Stat. 1 3 E. 6. 2 1 Jac. 11. Hutton 131. If the Offence be committed out of this Realm yet it cannot be tried upon the Statute of 35 H. 8. cap. 2. Stat 35 H. 8. 2. of Trial of Treasons committed out of the Realm For this Act hath prescribed a special form of a Trial in this Case which must be observed And if such Offender be a Peer of England Indictment of a Peer the Indictment cannot be taken before any others then the Justices of Assize and Goal delivery in the County where he is imprisoned or the Justices of the Kings Bench Hutton 131. Lord Digbies Case Stat. Sect. 22. Trial of Peers Provided always That if any Peér of this Realm shall happen to be Indicted of any Offence made Treason by this Act he shall have his Trial by his Péers as in other like Cases of Treason is accustomed Stat. Sect. 23. And be it further Enacted That if any Subject of this Realm at any time after one month next after the end of this present Session of Parliament shall not resort or repair every Sunday to some Chuch Chappel or some other usual place appointed for Common Prayer and there hear Divine Service according to the Statute made in that behalf in the first year of the Reign of the late Q. Elizabeth that then it shall and may be lawful to and for any one Iustice of Peace of that Limit Division or Liberty wherein the said party shall dwell upon proof unto him made of such default by confession of the party or Oath of witness to call the said party before him and if he or she shall not make a sufficient excuse and due proof thereof to the satisfaction of the said Iustice of Peace That it shall be lawful for the said Iustice of Peace to give Warrant to the Churchwarden of the said Parish wherein the said party shall dwell under his Hand and Seal to levy twelve pence for every such default by distress and sale of the Goods of every such Offender rendring to the said Offender the Overplus of the money raised of the said Goods so to be sold and that in default of such distress it shall and may be lawful for the said Iustice of Peace to commit every such Offender to some Prison within the said Shire Division Limit or Liberty wherein such Offender shall be inhabiting until payment be made of the said sum or sums so to be forfeited which forfeiture shall be imployed to and for the use of the Poor of that Parish wherein the Offender shall be resident or abiding at the time of such Offence committed Provided That no man be impeached upon this Clause Within what time the Offender shall be impeached except he be called in question for his said default within one month next after the said default made And that no man being punished according to this Branch But once punished for one Offence shall for the same Offence be punished by the forfeiture of twelve pence upon the Law made in the first year of the late Quéen Elizabeth If any Subject of this Realm By a Subject of this Realm Subject of this Realm who here meant is to be understood a natural born Subject or an Alien naturalized here by Act of Parliament or made a Denizen of England by the Kings Letters Patents And who not But these words here are exclusive of two sorts of Subjects 1. Of an Alien inhabiting in this Realm who oweth to the King a local Subjection or Ligeance and is neither naturalized or made Denizen For the word Subject is as a mark of distinction and must be necessarily exclusive of some persons or other within this Realm and therefore cannot be supposed to take in meer Aliens who if neither naturalized or made Denizens are only local Subjects and of the lowest form For if no person inhabiting within the Realm were here intended to be excepted the word Subject would be idle and to no purpose 2. An Alien Naturalized by Act of Parliament in Scotland or Ireland or made Denizen of either of those Kingdoms by the Kings Letters Patents is for the same reason out of the meaning of this Branch although he live in England For it seems that such a person is still an Alien here and shall not partake of any priviledges in England by his being Naturalized or made Denizen in Scotland or Ireland Their Acts or Laws not being Obligative or concluding to us in England Vide Vaughan 278 279 280 285 287. Craw versus Ramsey And therefore the power here given any one Justice of Peace to levy the twelve pence per Sunday doth not extend to either sort of these Aliens An Alien within Stat. 1. Eliz. 2 but yet they may forfeit twelve pence per Sunday for their absence from Church upon an Indictment of the Statute of 1 Eliz. cap. 2. and that by force of the general words there Every person and persons inhabiting within this Realm so that what is said in Dr. Fosters Case Co. 11.63 viz. That this Statute gives a more speedy remedy for the Recovery of the twelve pence is not to be understood of all persons within 1 Eliz. but only of the Subjects of this Realm in the sense of this Branch of the Statute And if a man be born within any of the Kings Dominions which were such and united with England in their subjection at the time of his birth although he be not born within England Natural Subjection not local yet if he live here he is a Subject of this Realm within the intent of this Act For Natural Subjection and Ligeance are not local or confined to that Kingdom or Country where he was born But he is a natural Subject in any of the Dominions belonging at the time of his Birth to the Prince under whom he was born And upon this ground it was resolved in Calvins Case Co. lib. 7. Postnati That a man born in Scotland after the Union of the two Kingdoms should inherit in England So that a man born in Scotland or Ireland or any other of the Kings Dominions which were such and so united at the time of his birth if he live in England is punishable by this Act and any one Justice of Peace may grant his Warrant to levy the twelve pence for his absence from Church vide antea Sect. 19. Morning and Evening Prayers Every Sunday This repairing to Church every Sunday must be as well to Evening Prayers as to Morning Prayers For it ought to be an entire day and an entire Service By Hutton and Berkley Justices Dalton V. cap. 45. tit Recusants To the satisfaction of the said Iustice of Peace In this Case the Justice of