the four mighty Monarchies of the world and by continuall alterations in States to this day Secondly in earthly kingdomes there is one the King and the rest are his subiects but in this kingdome all are Kings and God alone is King of all Neither doeth this anie whâ—t diminish our glorie For euen his seruice is perfect libertie yea the more perfect our seruice is to him the farther we are from bondage and the more absolute is our spirituall regâ—lâ—tie Thirdly the affaires of earthly Princes are â—â—iefly bodiâ—y and outward but ours are spirituall and inward Fourthly kings of this world if they should prooue worldly minded as the most are and vse to bee may become Tyrants and irreconciliable enemies one vnto another labouring with all their powers to deturbe and ouer throw each other But so iâ— falleth not out with those whome Christ hath made kings For he so ruleth them by his Spirit and with the Scepter of his word that they shall neuer clime to that height of wickendesse as of despite and purpose to seeke the destruction of one anothers soule and to depriue them of their crownes Fiftly earthly kings may be plagued of God to the losse of their soules and therfore Esay saith that Tophet or hell Is 30. 33. is prepared for the King euen for all wicked Princes whatsoeuer which rebell against the King of Kings But these kings shall neuer perish For Christ giueth them eternall life and it is their Ioh. 10. 28. Luk. 12. 32. Fathers pleasure to giue them the kingdome of heauen Lastly earthly Kings come to their kingdomes either by conquest or by their bloud or else by voyces and election But we obtaine this kingdome neyther by the conquest of our owne workes nor by the suffrages election of other men neither come we by it through the commendation or dignitie of flesh or bloud but by the alone propitious grace of God and propitiatory merits of Iesus Christ who by suffering death and fulfilling the lawe for vs hath redeemed vs from hell and procured heauen and this our heauenly honour Therefore the Apostle saith The wages of sinne is death but the 1. Pet. 2. 5. free gift of God is eternall life through Iesus Christ our Lord. So much for our Prince-hood Now as concerning our Priest-hood Saint Peter who tells vs that wee are an Rom. 12. 1. holy Priest-hood tells vs also the ende of this our Priest-hood euen to offer vp spirituall Sacrifices acceptable vnto God by Iesus Christ. Wherein then doe we differ from the Priestsvnder the lawe and from Christ the High-Priest of all his people I answere we differ from the priests of the old Testament First because their sacrifices were types of Christ but so are not ours Secondly they offeâ—ed the bodies of other things wee offer our owne Thirdly their offrings were merely corporall ours properly are spirituall Fourthly they offered vp â—â—aine sacrifices and dead but we are commanded to offer vp our bodies a liuing sacrifice Rom 12. 1. and we offer vp our selues aliue Fiftly they were Priests for others but we are Priests for no men properly as they were Sixtly their Altar was material and earthly but ours is aliue and heauenly to wit Christ Iesus Seuenthly their priesthood had an end but ours is eternall Eightly theirs went from one to another by succession but so doth not ours Ninthly amongst them some were seperiours but there is no such diuersitie of degrees among vs beeing simply considered as we are Priestes Indeed there is diuersity of graces and there shal be inequality of glory thogh there shal be no want but fulnesse in all Tenthly many of them were wicked and some professed enemies of Christ his religion But they which Christ hath made Priests are holy chosen and a 1. Pet. z. 9. people set at liberty such as shal not dy but liue Lastly they were all of them males of one nation and of one kinred of that nation and they to be without any bodily defect or blemish but amoÌ„gst Eeuit 21. 18 vs there are both men women of all tribes nations and though many of them want not outward defects either by nature or by accident yet Christ respecteth not the outward estate of any man in working for vs this honour Now as concerning Christ and his Priesthood he was the Substance or Truth of all those Sacrifices and shadowes at his death their date went out whereas contrariwise our Priest-hood then began So that wee are but vassalls to that great â—igh Priest Secondly hee is an externall Priest of the New Testament but we are spirituall Priests and not outward Thirdly his principall sacrifice was himselfe but we haue other sacrifices Heb. 9. 11. to offer besides our selues our selues no way acceptable in our selues but in him Fourthly his sacrifice was of reconciliation to satisfie the iustice of God for vs But ours is of thanksgiuing to God not satisfactory but declaratory to shew our selues mindfull of that expiatory sacrifice which Christ offered and to testifie our loue vnto him for it and how gratefully we do receiue it Fifthly his was offered once for all but ours must be offered daily vpon all occasions Sixtly he as Preist was God and Man but we are meere men simple and silly creatures Seauenthly his Altar was his Godhead but our Altar is his Godhead and Manhead also vnited in one person Eightly his Sacrifice was voluntary hee did not owe it to vs but ours are debts which are for many causes to be performed duely of vs. Ninthly if wee had not sinned his sacrifice had bene spared but some of ours should haue bin performed of vs though we had not sinned Tenthly the goodnesse of his sacrifice came from himselfe but if ours haue any goodnesse so farre sorth as they be good it is from his holy Spirit which worketh in vs. Lastly Christs sacrifice was perfect of it selfe being his who is perfect man and perfect God but ours are in this life maymed and imperfect and their imperfection is couered by the perfection of his And thus we see the glorious estate of all the faythfull that euen as Christ their Head is a king and Priest so are all they kings and priests also yea a kingdome of priests a regall and holy priesthood although it be with great difference For they receiue this honour by him and not he through them He is a king by nature but they by grace Hee is an absolute Prince ouer all creatures whatsoeuer and ouer the very conscience but so are not they He is now in the full possession of his kingdome so are not we but we wayt in our mortall bodies of this earthly thraldome for the hope of that mortall and regall liberty of the sonnes of God in the heauens CHAP. IIII. Foure instructions arising from the coÌ„sidederation of our Princehood HAuing now declared the nature of this benefit it remaineth for me to gather the
who is true God And thus Marie contrarie to the opinion of Nestorius may be saide to be the mother of God to wit of that person or of that man who is God So we must vse to say that a man hath eies hands and legges and that truely yet the soule which is the more excellent part of man hath not any such For it is an incorporall and spirituall substance If it be demanded froÌ„ wheÌ„ce the blood of Christ doth deriue such dignitie and desert as that it procureth the pardon of sinne or the clensing of our soules from all corruption I answere that it proceedeth from his God head or person because it was the bloud of God the bloud of that innocent and iust man that is also truly God therfore it was of admirable excellencie and of inexplicable vigour and value sufficient for merit to haue cleÌ„sed a thousand thousand worlds of sinnes If further it be demanded how they that were before Christ and we that doe liue since his death can be truely said to be washed from our sinnes by his bloud which is not now shed nor then could be seeing that hee was not borne I answere Christ is the Lamb of God Reu. 13. 8. that was slaine from the beginning of the World to wit in respect of faith and of Gods eternall decree and gracious acceptation so that his bloud is not nor euer was drie in regard of merit efficacie but whosoeuer did receiue and applie it to his heart by faith was purged from his sinnes which is signified when it is said that He hath washed vs that is he hath clensed purified absolued or procured the remission or absolution of sinnes for all the elect faithfull people of God wheresoeuer or whatsoeuer Therefore Iohn saith 1. Ioh. 2. 2. that he is a Reconcilation for the sinnes of the whole world of the Elect. And the authour to the Hebrâ—wes saith that hee Heb. 2. 9. tasted death for all men that is for the Elect of all sorts and sexes and for them onely And therefore he saith that his Math. 26. 28. blood was shed for many and not for all without exception of any God commaunded the Arke and the Mercy-seat Ex. 25. 10. 17. to be made of one length and breadth thereby shewing that his Mercy in Christ should be extended no farther then the Church If Christ would not Ioh. 17. 9. safe the reprobate a praâ—er we may not think that he would giue theÌ„ his blood From sinnes Siâ—â—â— saith Iohn is theâ— transgression of the Law euen euery aberration from the Law of God 1. Ioh. 3. 4. which is the Rule of our obedience the Touchstone of all our Actions and as it were the Epistle of the Creator to his creatures Sinâ—â— is either originall or actuall Originall sinne consisteth in the guiâ—â— of Adams first transgression and in the want of that puriâ—â—e wherein we were aâ— first created and in an incâ—ination and propensiue to all manner of wickednesse Actuall â—innâ— is any preâ—â—rication and breach of the lawâ—â—r will of God in thought word or worke whether by commission of euill or omission of good Now by sinnes in this place we must vnderstand all both originall and actuall euen all transgressions of Gods commandements whether legall or eâ—angelicall and the punishments due vnto vs for them where obserue that he calleth Sinnes our Sinnes for Sinne is our owne and not Christs For he 2. Cor. 5. 21. knew no sinne Neither are they Gods For he is not the author of that whereof Non est auctor eius cuius est vltor Fulgent he is the reuenger And Dauid saith Thou art not a God thâ—t louest wickednesse neither shall euill dwell with thee Psal 5. 4. So then the meaning of the words is this Christ hath purchased the pâ—rdâ—â— of all our sinnes and hath deliuered vs from the guilt punishment of them all by the merite of his Sacred blood whereby hee hath appeased his Father and couered vs from his wrathfull indignation as with a â—â—yle But yet that wee may attaine to the perfect vnderstanding of these words two questions had need to be answered First it may be demaÌ„ded how Christ can be saide to haue washed vs from our sins seeing that sin remaineth in vs vnto death For our satisfaction herein we must know that Christ is â—â—â—de to wash our sinnes away in his blood because hee hath therby procured their pardon so as that they shall neuer be imputed to vs vnto condemnation For sin is washed away two waies First when God forgiues it and layeth it not to our charge and this he doth in the iustification of a sinner Secondly when he mortifieth it and repaireth his ruinated image within vs and this is called the washing of sanctification Now the washing of sanctification is properly vnderstood in the text SecoÌ„dly it may be demanded wherin the absolution washing away of sin in Iustification by the blood of Christ differeth from the ablution purging of it in sanctification by the water and fire of the Holy Ghost Or wherin remission of sinnes differs from regeneration and wherein they iump They agree in three respects First in their efficient cause For God is the author of both through the merit of Christ Secondly they haue one commune instrumentall cause which is faith Thirdly they haue one generall end to wit the glory of God and the saluation of our soules But yet they differ very much in other respects First in their forme or nature For remission of sins is an action of God wherby he doth couer our sins in the blood of Christ not imputing them to vs but to Christ RegeneratioÌ„ is a work of God wherby through the effectuall operatioÌ„ of his Spirit he doth alter and change the heart mortifying the flesh illuminating the mind refining the affections and sanctifying all the parts of the body and all the powers of the soule Secondly they differ in their subiect For the minde the will and the affections are the subiects of sanctification but not of the remission of sins The obedience of Christ is imputed to vs and is not inhoerent in vs as are the graces of regeneration Remission of sinne is an action of God out of a man but mortification is within a man Thirdly their obiect is diuerse For the law is the obiect of sanctification but remission of sinne respecteth the obedience of Christ Fourthly they differ in their effects For remission of sins makes vs to be accounted no sinner but so doth not regeneration The abluâ—ion of sin in iustification is our absolution but the ablution of sin by sanctification is not our absolution but a consequeÌ„t signe thereof Remission of sinne keepes â—â—n from condemning vs but regeneration keepes sin onelâ— from tyrâ—nnizing and doâ—â—ering ouer vs. Fiâ—â—ly Remissiâ—n of sins is pâ—rfect in this life and acted at one instant by Rom. 8. 1. God though we come
a wonder to see how carefully men will aâ—oide a pest-house or a place infected and yet care not to runne vnto the harboures of beastly drunkennes and filthy lust the very schooles of the diuell and stewes of vncleannes infected with the plague of vngodlinesse as dangerous to his soule that with delight frequeÌ„ts them as is a house infected with the pestience to the body As we are careful to shun the dirt in our wayes and to keep our apparell cleane and our bodyes free from diseases so wee ought vnlesse like mad-men wee feare no danger to labour that our soules may be free from the loathsome and mortall disease of sinne and that we be not defiled with the dâ—â—t of iniquitie nor bemyred in the puddle of wickednes but that we may be cleane and pure Vse 4 Lastly therefore wee are taught to pray with Dauid Wash mee throughly Psal 5. 12. from mine iniquitie and clense mee from my sinne And indeede we shall not be cleane vnlesse the Lord doe purge vs throughly our sinne doth hang so fast about vs and inuiâ—on vs. It doth not onely besmeare and grime vs on the out-side but it tainteth the in-side also It doth not onely cleaue as it were to the skin as Iuy to the rind of an oake but it lyeth in the bones it is got into the pyth and lurketh in the heart as a Fox in his hole a Lyon in his den or as the plague doth in the body Let vs therefore labour to be deliuered of it Desire God to bathe thee in his Ez. 36. 25. sonnes bloud and to power cleane water euen the clensing water of his spirit vpon thee If our clothes be spotted we are careful to rub out the spots and shall we neglect to get out the filthy spots of sinne out of our soules If a man were weather-beaten vpon the Sea he would wish that he were vpon the shore or if he were in some loathsome and stinking dungeon he would gladly be out of it Beloued there is no sea so dangerous no dungeon so foule and stinking as our sinnes let vs therfore labour to be deliuered from them let vs desire God to lay the tempest and with the prosperous gale of his grace to bring vs safe to the shore and by his hand to draw vs out of this dungeon And as Dauid prayeth Bring my Psal 142. 7 soule out of prison that I may praise thy name So let vs pray him to bring vs out of the prison of sinne and to take from vs the bolts of wickednes and to clense and dresse vs and to strip vs of our prison garments that beeing set at libertie we may serue him freely and glorifie his name for his kindnesse to vs. CHAP. VII Remission of sinnes is through the bloud of Christ Though Christ did merit our pardon yet God the Father may be said to forgiue vs freely in two respects SIxtly seeing the Apostle saith that Doct. 6 Christ hath washed vs from our sins in his blood I gather that Christ is our Heb. 9. 11. 12. onely High-priest who by his owne blood hath purchased the pardon of our sins satisfied the iustice of God for them and so remoued their guilt punishment from vs. He hath washed vs therefore now we are cleane He Is. 53. 4. â—5 was wounded for our transgressions the 〈…〉 ment of our peace was vpon him and by his sâ—ripâ—â— we are healed Surely he hath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and caryed our so 〈◊〉 And Paul expressely saith that Eph. 1. 7. by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 two haue redemption to wit the remissiâ— of â—ins By his owne blood saith the Holy Ghost he entred in once into the holy place obtained eternall redemption for vs. And to deliuer vs from the Gal. 3. curse of the Law he was made a curse All which testimonies of holy writ doe serue fulficiently to proue remission of sins by his blood Now wheÌ„ we heare that sin is forgotteÌ„ we must also know tâ—a the punishment is taken away For common reason sheweth eius quod 〈◊〉 est nullam esse poenam that ther is no punishment dâ—e for that which is not But sin is not wheÌ„â—t is once forgiuen For the Lambe of God hath taken it away And indeed ther is â—o great affi 〈◊〉 betweene sinne and the punishment thereof that the Hebrewes were wont to call them by one name by Gen. 4. 7. Leuit. 20. 17. 19. which the Scriptures signifie that sinnes are then punished and neuer but then when the fault is not forgiueÌ„ And iâ— tâ—â—s be true that God retaineth the punishment when he doth not remit the fault then by the law of contraries it followeth that God doth not retaine the punishment when he doth remit the fault But by the merit of Christs blood 〈◊〉 fault is forgiuen therefore the punishment also which followeth the fault in respect of desert vt vmbrasequitâ—r corpus as the shaddow doth the body and as light the Sun Furthermore seeing those that looked vpon the brazen serpent were cured both of their stingings and of the paines that ensued why may wee not say that they which looke vpon Christ with the eye of saith are not only deliuered of their sinnes and biting of the serpent Satan but also of al paines and punishments which by desert at least doe followe them 2. Augustine sayeth That Christ De Ver. Dei Ier. 37. tooke away both the fault and the punishment And Tertullian saith Exempto reatu eximitur et poena that when the De Bapt. guilt is taken away the punishment is remoued By which it is euident that both fault and punishment are forgiuen vs through the bloud of Christ Qu. It may be theÌ„ demaÌ„ded how god can be saied to forgiue sinne freely seing Christ hath merited the pardon of it by his blood An. I answere in two respects First because we by our selues haue not procured the pardon but Christ for vs of his mere good will Secondly because God did freely of his owne benignitie send his sonne to bee our ransome as Christ himselfe doth witnesse God so loued the world that he gaue his onely begotten Ioh. 3. 16. sonne that whosoeuer beleeueth in him should not perish but haue euerlasting life By which we see plainly that gods loue is the primary cause of our redemption by Christ Neither must the iustice of God be called into question for laying our sins vpoÌ„ him that knew no sin and for punishing the innocent for the offenders For the righteous may suffer for the vnrighteous Christ may without the breach of Iustice bleed for vs purchase pardoÌ„ by his blood if these fiue conditions do concurâ—e in his passion First his blood-shed must be voluntarie without compulsion Secondly it must be perfectly propitiatory able to satisfie him to the full that is offended Thirdly he must be of the same nature for whome he suffereth Fourthly he must be able to preserue himselfe from perishing