Selected quad for the lemma: law_n
Text snippets containing the quad
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
A91891
|
The peoples plea for the exercise of prophesie. Against master John Yates his monopolie / by Iohn Robinson.
|
Robinson, John, 1575?-1625.
|
1641
(1641)
|
Wing R1696; Thomason E1093_1; ESTC R208638
|
39,795
|
82
|
more excellent yet ââ is more profitable it being most plaine that the Apostle prefer prophesie before tongues because it tends more tâ edification of the Church according to which respect alone wee are to measure the excellency oâ Church ordinances and so to frame the obiect oâ our desire unto them But what speake I of more excellent and more to edification since the strange tongues as there used without an interpreter were so far from being comparible to ordinary prophesie for any good end or used as they were on the contrary most vaine and rediculous as appeares ver. 11 22. 23. That then which he brings for the commendation of tongues from Actes 2. is nothing for tongues as used in Corenth The former were as of simple necessity in themselues unto the Apostles for spreading of the Gospell unto all nations so then â there profitably used but in Corinth ambitiâly and profanely abused which M. Yates should âe observed but hath not in his comparison Lastââ add as aiust answer to whatsoever he hath obâted That tongues considered in themselves how âhtly soever used are not comparible for use and âor excellency vnto ordinary prophesying or preaâng considered in it self seing that by it as well by extraordinary saying faith is wrought Rom. 10 ââich none can say of strange Tongues in themâves without a strange Tongue both from truth âd sence no nor of any other spirituall gift And as it doth not appeare by the Apostles preâring of prophesie before tongâes that therefore ââ prophesie was extraordinary so it appeare unâ mee by the Corinthians preferring of tongues âforâ it that it was but ordinary therefore disâarded by them in comparison of the extraordinaâ and miraculous gift of tongues whereas had it âo been extraordinary immediate and miraculous âost like it would have caried with it the like with ââ other or greater regard in their eyes M. Yates ARGVM 6. âROM exemplification ver. 6. if I come unto âouâ â I hope you will grant that the Apostle Paul had all those spirituall gifts and therefore speaking of sâ prophesie as he had himselfe he must needs speak of âtraordinary likewise he had the knowledge of tongâ and yet prefers prophesie before all his languages thouâ hee speake more then they âââ Now the example in â own person must needs seâ forââ he generall and therfore if in the generall ââ sâââlâ speak of ordinary prophâsying and in the particulâr of extraordinary it woâ prove idle for an example is of the sâme kinde wâ the generall Again in bringing foure particulers he pâ revelation first as the causâ of all the rest which showâ plainly he speaks of such prophesâe ââ câme by revelatiâ for revelation brings ââân to knowledge and knowledâ teacheth wholsome ãâ¦ã and prophesie serveth to âter it I. ROB. ANSWER I Do plainely deny the ground upon which â builds the whole weight of his argument which â that the example and the thing exemplified must â of the same kind How oft doth Christ exemplifâ the sufferings of his disciples by his owne suffârings and the sending of his Apostles by his fatheâ sending of him were they therfore of the same kinâ their sufferings meritorious and their sendinâ mediatorious because his was such But amongst other evidences against him wherewith all writingâ divine and humane are stored see one fitly paringâ with this in hand The Apostle provoking the Galâthians â 1 unto iust detestation of such as preached aâther Gospel amongst them takes an example from âs owne preaching ves 8. But though wee or an ângell from heaven preach another Gospell unto yov ân that which we have preached vnto yov let him be acârsed As if he should say I have preached vnto you ârmerly iustification by faith without the works of âe Law of Moses they now preach vnto you iustifiâation by the works of the law ioyned with Christ âc He exemplifieth their preaching by his were âey therefore of one kind both Apostolicaâ becavse âauls was such It is sufficient for an example if it âgree with the thing which it is brought to exemâlifie in that for which it is brought And so the âomming of Christ to iudgement is by the Apostle âxemplified by the comming of a thief in the night â Thess. 5. Are therefore their commings of the âme kind or is it not sufficient that being most âontrary in their kinds they do yet agree in the adânct of suddenesse So is it sufficient if Pauls exââaordinary Prophesying and the Corinthians orâinary agree in the adiunct or effect of profitableâesse or edification which thing alone the Apostle â his exemplification hath respect unto His obserâation about Revelation seems true and good in it âelfe but shews not plainely that for which he brings â no nor hath so much as a plaine shew for it For âhat shew hath it of proof that he speaks of extraordinary prophesie because it comes from revelation except he takes it for granted that there is in the Church no revelation of the spirit for teaching buâ extraordinary or miraculous which how can I graâ or he assirme Of this more Argum. 8. M. Yates ARG. 7. FROM the fruition of spirituall gifts 1 Cor. 14 2. 6. hath a Psalme that is some admirable praise oâ God or doctrine that is some worthy point of instruction or a tongue that is can speak misteries with admiration or revelations of some secrets either for doctriââ or prediction lastly or interpretation whether of tonâuesâ doctrines or Scripture all these must needs bee had either by the ordinary païnes of the Church or by the extraordinary gift of the spirit you say by the one and â by the other and that I agree more with the scriptuââ then your selfe consider but the distinction â the gifts and their admirable matter A Psalme must needs consist of meeter which required art to compose ââ Secondly it could not for the matter of it but sound forth some worthy praise of God Do you think the corinthianâ did study the art of musick or likewise read some admirable divine books to find out sweete matter to make their songs of Alas brother give God the glory it was no doubt some sudden motion of the spirit that did inflame the hearts of beleevers with some worthy matter of praising God Doctrine that is laid downe by our ordinary paines is that we usualy give vnto Doctors which after long study and reading the Scriptures is drawne unto some profitable heads pithily proved and contrary errours refuted by it I thinke in Corinth there were none of these Doctors and yet I doubt not but they were as excellent for such Doctors as delivered these Doctrines had them after â more easie manner even the immediate worke of the spirit I hope with out any further dispute you will yeeld âhat the having of a strange tongue was extraordinary aââikewise the revelation and interpretation I. Rob. ANSW NOt to meddle with his description of a Psalm Doctrine
with the rest Iohn 20. 22 23. 1 Now if the commission Apostolike were but tââ giuen they were but then not before actually âpostles except he will say they were Apostles beââ they had commission that is calling from Christ to bee I would now see how hee can salue â wound which he hath given himselfe 2 After that the Lord Iesus had Mat. 11. 11. pâferred Iohn Baptist aboue all the Prophets whiâ were before him he yet adds in the same place thâthe least in the Kingdom of heauen is greater then ââ The least that is the least Minister In the kingdom â heauen that is in the church of the new testameÌt prâporly called which began not till after the death â Christ who liuâd and dyed a member of the Iewiââurch the Apostles then being officers of the âurch of the new testament and Kingdom of heaââ and not of the old or Iewish Church it cannot ââ that they were Apostles in act before Christ âath except an adiunct can be before the subject âd an officer before the corporation in of which is an officer â Considering the ignorance of these disciples at ââ time in the maine misteries of Christ of the naâe of his kingdom his death and âeâurâection âat 20. 21. Luk. 24. 20. 21. c. âohâ 20. 9. Mar. â 14. as also how utterly ãâ¦ã they were gifts befitting Apostâlâcal teaching for which âeing an extraordânary dispensotion and that in â highest degree extraordânary infallible revela direction of the spirit was âequisit wher with âây were but first âs it seemetâ âpâinckled John â and afterwards more plentifully filled at the day Pentecost they were as fit for an Apostleship as ââvid was for Sauls armour which he could not âeild nor goe wiâh 4. Besides if they had the office of Apostleship âmmitted to them Mat. 10. how was it that they ântinued not their ministration in that office but âârning after a few dayes to their master continuâ with him as his disciples till his death Christ Ieâ did not keepe a company of none-residents about âm for his Chaplins as M. Yates insinuates against ââ Lastly we are expresly taught Eph. 4. 8. 11. â Christ âsâended on high he gaue gifts unto men Apoâ Prophets c. The Apostles then were first giuen âtually at the Lords ascension and Were before oâ designed to become Apostles or Apostles âlect â not ordained nor possessed of any office and therfore preached and that with warrant from Chrâ without office The next Scripture is Luk. 8. 39. by M. Yâ thus opened Christ hauing deliuered the man possessââids him go and shew what great things God had â for him and it is sayd he went and Preached that is â be to their purpose by ordinary paines and study he prââched the Gosple And with pitty upon us poore soâ that cannot distinguish the publishing of amiracle â the gift he should say the work if he distinguish as he ought of preaching he addeth that if âââ had minded to haue made him a publike preacher he â first have taken him with him and instructed him â then haue sent him abroad 1. Let it be obserued that the word used by Mâ for his preaching {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} is the same word which commonly used for the most solemne preachiâ that is by the Apostles and Euangelists Secondâ Christ bids him Mar. 5. 19. Go home and declare â great things the Lord had done for him and had had câ passion on him and ver. 20. he is sayd to haue publishâ in Decapolis Luke hath it ãâ¦ã âgreat things Iesus had done for him Which he doâ what else did hee but preach publish and deâe the great loue and mercy of God in and by Ieâ Christ towards miserable sinners for the curing of âir bodily and spirituall maladies 3. Where he âes the pyblishing of this miracle and the preaching of â Gospel diuers things and pitties us pooâe soules that cannot distinguish between them as Christ bade the âen of Jerusalem not to weep for him but for themâs so surely had he need tâ pitty not us herein â himselfe in his so great mistaking Are not the âacles of Christ storied in the Scripture a maine â of the Gospel and the publishing of them a â of the preaching of the Gospel And when M. âs opens publisheth a miracle of Christs as this â did doth he not as well and as truly preach the âspel as at any other time Let the wise iudge â is to be pittied To shut up this point it is sayd â 20. 30. that Iesus did many other signes c. and â 21. But these are writen that yee might beleeue that âs is the Christ the sonne of God and that beleeuing â might haue lefe through his name The publishing â of the signes miracles which Christ did is the âching of faith in his name to salvation which â man therefore did espetially amongst them âch were not ignorant of the Law of Moses and âmise of the Messiah to come which by his glorious miracles done by his owne power and in his oâ name he both declared and proued himselfe to âJoh 5 36 10. 37. 38. And where he adds that Câ gaue this man commission to do that which he diâ but â mirs who gaue ours such authority I answer euen â same Christ as then immediately so now mediaâ by those unto whome he hath giuen authority uâ himselfe for the ordering of the gifts of his spirit his Church And sufficient it is for the question ââtween him and me if it appeare as in this peâ that Christ hath giuen commission to men oâ office by an ordinary gift to publish and preacâ publick the Gospel of saluation I doe quote next in my booke Luk. 10. â which for that W. E. omitteth and leaues out âYates thanketh God but in truth he hath more â to thanke him for sparing him a place which so pânantly proueth the preaching of the kingdom ofâ by men out of office except he can assigne some â found office and the same but of two or three â lasting as ver. 17. to those 70 there sent We are in the next place to come unto Joh. 4â 29. 39. which he openeth and answereth with aâration as the foâmeâ place witâ pitty and comâsion on this manner â simplicitie with contrâtion to his owne writing simplicity that cannot see bâ preaching of the Gospel and carrying tydings of aâ that told her to wit the woman of Samaria â things that euer she did is not this saith she the Christ ât besides simplicity here is contradiction for sayes M âbinson and that truly a woman is not suffered to exâise an ordinary gift of prophesie in the Church and âll the women of samaria serue your turne that it is lawââll for men to exercise such a gift It is indeed my simplicity to thinke that the Gosâ as the word importeth is nothing else But glad âdings and