most open and euidente so it is moste conformable to the lawe of God of Nature and of that Realme And consequentlye in a manner of all other Realmes in the worlde as growing by the nearest proximitie of the Royal blood She is a Kinges and a Queenes daughter her selfe a Queene daughter as is before declared to the late King Iames of Scotlande sonne to Ladie Margarete the eldest Syster to the late King Henrie the eight VVhose daughter also the late Ladie Lenoux was by a later husbande But Ladie Frauncis late wife to Henrie Marques Dorsette afterwarde Duke of Suffolke and the Ladie Eleonour late wife to the Earle of Cumberlande and their Progenie proceede from the Lady Marie Dowager of Fraunce yongest Sister of the sayd King Henrye late wyfe to Charles Brandon Duke of Suffolke as is before declared I might here fetche foorth olde farne dayes I might reache backe to the noble worthie Kings long before the Conquest of whose Royal blood she is descended VVhiche I Intend not to treat vpon at this tyme. And though perhappes it might seme not much to enforce her title yet may it serue to proue her no stranger to England being of so long continuance and so many wayes descended of the kings and Royal blood of that Realme But the Argumentes and prouffes whiche we meane to alleage and bring forth for the confirmation of her right and title in Succession as Heire apparent to the Croune of England are gathered and grounded vpon the lawes of God and nature and not onely receaued in the Ciuile policies of other nations but also in the olde lawes and Customes of the Realme of England by reason approued by vsage and longe continuance of tyme obserued from the first constitution of that Realme in politicall order vnto this present day And yet for all that hath it bene and yet is by some men attempted artificiallye to obiecte and caste many mystie darke cloudes before mennes eyes to kepe from them if it may be the cleare light of the sayd iust title the whiche they would extinguish or at the least blemish with some obscure shadow of lawe but in deede against the lawe and with the shadowe of Parlamentes but in deede against the true meaning of the Parlamentes And though it were enough for vs our cause being so firmely and suerly established vpon all good reason and lawe to stande at defence and only to auoide as easely we may their obiections whiche principally and chiefly are grounded vpon the common lawes and Statutes of that Realme yet for the bettering and strengthening of the same we shall Lay forth sundrie great inuincible reasons conioyned with good and sufficient authoritie of the lawe so approued and confirmed that the Aduersaries shal neuer be able iustly to impugne them And so as we trust after the reading of this Treatise and the effectes of the same well digested no maner of scruple ought to remaine in any indifferent mans hart concerning her right and title VVhose expectation and conscience allthough we truste fully in this Discourse to satisfie doubt nothing of the righteousnes of our cause yet must we nedes confesse the manner forme to entreate therof to be full of difficulty perplexity For such causes of Princes as they be seldome and rare so is it more rare strange to finde them discoursed discussed and determined by any lawe or statute albeit nowe then some statutes tende that waye Inst de iust iure â— fin Neither do the lawes of England nor the Corps of the Romaine and Ciuil lawes medle so muche with the direction of the right L. princeps â— de leg l. dignuÌ„ vâ—x C. eodem and titles of kings as with priuate mens causes And yet this notwithstanding for the better iustification of our cause albeit it I denie not but that by the common lawe it must be knowen who ought to haue the Croune and that the common lawe muste discerne the right aswel of the Croune as of subiectes yet I saye that there is a great difference betwene the Kings right and the right of others The common lavve of England is rather grounded vpon a generall custome than vpon any lavve vvritten And that the title of the Croune of that Realme of England is not subiect to the rules and principles of the common lawe of that Realme as to be ruled and tryed after suche order and course as the inheritance of priuate persones is by the same For the proofe whereof let vs consider what the common lawe of that Realme is and how the rules thereof be grounded and do take place It is very manifeste and plaine In Prologo suo eiusdeÌ„ li. fo 1. 2. De dict Ranulpho Glanuilla vide Giraldum Cambren in topogra de VVallia that the common lawe of the Realme of England is no lawe written but is grounded onely vpon a common and generall custome throughout the whole Realme as appeareth by the Treatise of the auncient famous VVriter of the lawes of the Realme named Ranulphus de Glanuilla who wrote in the time of the noble King Henrie the second of the lawe and Custome of the Realme of England being then and also in the time of the raigne of King Richarde the firste the chiefe Counsailour and Iustice of the same king and also by the famouse Iustice Fortescue in his booke whiche he wrote being Chauncellour of England De laudibus Legum Angliae Fortescue de lau Leg. Angl. c. 17. 8. E. 4. 19. 33. H. 6. 51. Pinsons prime And by 33. H. 6. 51. and by E. 4. 19. VVhiche Custome by vsage and continuall practise heretofore had in the kinges Courts within that Realme is onely knowen and mainteined wherein the English nation seeme much agreable to the olde Lacedemonians who many hundred yeres past Inst de in re natura gent. ciuil §. ex non script most politikely and famously gouuerned their common VVealth with lawe vnwritten whereas among the Athenians the writen lawes bare all the sway This thing being so true as with any reason or good authoritie it can not be denied then we are further to consider whether the kinges title to the Croune can be examined tried and ordered by this common Custome or no. Yf it may then must yt be proued by some recorde that it hath bene so vsed otherwise the aduersaries only say it and nothing at all proue it For nothing can be sayde by lawe to be subiecte to any custome vnlesse the same hath bene vsed accordingly and by force of the same custome But I am well assured The Aduersaries haue shevved no rule of the common lavve that bindeth the Croune that the aduersaries are not able to proue the vsage and practise thereof by any record in any of the Kings courts Yea I will further say and also proue that they neither haue shewed nor can shew any one rule general or special of the
coÌ„mon lawe of that realme that hath bene taken by any iust coÌ„struction to extende vnto or bind the King or his Croune I will not denie but that to declare set forth the prerogatiue and Iurisdiction of the King they may shewe many rules of the lawe but to binde hym as I haue sayde they can shewe none The obiections of the aduersaries touching Aliens borne are clearlie auoided OVR aduersaries in a booke gyuen out by them touching this succession doe alleige for a Maxime in lawe most manifest that who so euer is borne out of England and of father and mother not being vnder obedieÌ„ce of the King of England can not be capable to inherite any thing in England VVhiche rule being generall without any wordes of exception they also say must nedes extende vnto the Croune VVhat they meane by lawe I knowe not But if they meane as I thinke they do the common lawe of England I answere there is no suche Maxime in the common lawe of the Realme of Englande as hereafter I shall manifestly proue But if it were for argumentes sake admitted for this time that it be a Maxime or general rule of the common lawe of England yet to saye that it is so general as that no exception can be taken against the same rule they shewe them selues either ignorant 25. E. 3. or els very carelesse of their credite For it doth plainely appeare by the Statute of 25. E. 3. being a declaration of that rule of the lawe which I suppose they meane in terminge it a Maxime that this rule extendeth not vnto the Kinges children VVhereby it moste euindently appeareth that it extendeth not generally to all And if it extende not to binde the Kinges children in respect of any inheritance descended vnto them from any of their Auncestours it is an Argument á forâ—iori that it doth not extende to binde the king or his Croune And for a full short answere to their Authorities sett foorth in their marginall Notes as 5. Edvvard 3. tt Aylâ— 1â— Edvva 3. tt Bref 31. Edvva 3. tt Cosen 42 Ed. 3 fol. 2 22 Henric. 6 fol. 42. 11. Henric. 4. 23. 24. Litleton ca. vileâ—age it may plainly appeare vnto all that will reade and peruse those Bookes that there is none of them all that doth so muche as with a peece of a word or by any colour or shadow seeme to intende that the title of the Croune is bounde by this their supposed generall rule or Maxime For euerie one of the said Cases argued and noted in the said Booke are onely concerning the dishabilitie of an Alien borne and not Denizon to demaunde any landes by the lawes of the Realme by suite and action onely as a subiect vnder the King The aduersaries case perteineth to subiectes onely and nothing touching any dishabilitie to be laied to the King hymselfe or to his subiectes Is there any coÌ„trouersie about the title of the Croune by reason of any suche dishabilitie touched in any of these Bookes No verely not one woord I dare boldely say As it may most manifestly appeare to them that will reade and pervse those bookes And yet the aduersaries are not ashamed to note them as sufficient authorities for the maintenance of their euill purpose and intent But as they would seeme to vnderstand that their rule of dishabilitie is a generall Maxime of the lawe so me thinketh they should not be ignorant that it is also as general No Maxime of the lavve bindeth the Croune vnles the Croune specially be named yea a more general rule Maxime of the lawe that no Maxime or rule of the lawe can extende to binde the king or the Croune vnlesse the same be specially mentioned therein as may appeare by diuerse principles and rules of the lawe which be as general as is their sayd supposed Maxime and yet neither the king nor the Croune is by any of them bound As for example it is very plaine 1. Of Tenant by the curtesy that the rule of Tenante by the Curtesie is general without any exception at all And yet the same bindeth not the Croune neither doth extende to geue any benefite to him that shall Marie the Queene of England As it was plainely agreed by all the lawiers of that Realme when king Philip was maried vnto Queene Marie although for the more suertie and plaine declaration of the intentes of King Philip and Queene Marie and of all the states of that Realme it was enacted 2. Nor that the landes shal be diuided among the daughters that king Philip should not clame any title to be Tenaunt by the Curtesie It is also a general rule that if a man dye seysed of any landes in Fee simple without yssue male hauing diuerse daughters the lande shal be equally diuided among the daughters VVhich rule the learned men in the lawes of that Realme agreed in the lyfe of the late noble Prince Edwarde and also euery reasonable man knoweth by vsage to take no place in the succession of the Croune For there the eldest enioyeth all 3. Nor the vvife shall haue the third part as though she were issue male Likewise it is a general rule that the wife after the decease of her husband shal be endowed haue the third parte of the best possessions of her husband And yet it is verie clere 5. E. 3. Tit. praeroga 21. E. 3. 9. 28. H. 6. that a Queene shall not haue the thirde parte of the landes belonging to the Croune as appeareth in 5. E. 3. Tit. praerogat 21. E. 3. 9. 28. H. 6. and diuers other bookes Bysides this the rule of Possessio fratris 4. Nor the rule of Possessio fratris c. being generall neither hath bene or can be stretched to the inheritance of the Croune For the brother of the half blood shall succede and not the sister of the whole blood as may appeare by Iustice Moile and may be proued by King Etheldred brother and successor to king Edward the Martyr and by kyng Edward the Confessor brother to king Edmunde and by diuers other who succeded in the Croune of England being but of the halfe blood As was also the late Queene Marie and is at this presente her sister VVho both in all recordes of the lawe wherein their seuerall rightes and titles to the Croune are pleaded as by daily experience in the Exchequer in all other Courtes is manifest doe make their conueiance as heires in blood the one to the other whiche if they were coÌ„mon or priuate persons they could not be allowed in lawe they as is well knowen being of the halfe blood one to the other that is to wit begotten of one father 5. Nor that the executour shall haue the goods and Chattles of the testatour 7. H. 4. fol. 42. but borne of sundrie mothers It is also a generall rule in the lawe that the executour shall haue the goodes and
we suppose they are ouer wise to goe about Bysides this I haue hard some of the aduersaries for further helpe of their intention in this matter say that king Henry the second was a Queenes childe so king by the rule of the common lawe Truely I know he was an Emperesse childe but no Queene of Englandes childe For although Maude the Emperesse his mother had a right and a good title to the Croune and to be Queene of England yet was she neuer in possession but kepte from the possession by king Stephen And therefore king Henry the second can not iustly be sayed to be a Queene of Englandes childe nor yet any kynges childe vnlesse ye would intend the kinges children by the wordes of Infantes de Roy c to be children of further degree descended from the right line of the king for so ye might say truely that he was the child of king Henry the first being in deede the sonne and heire of Maude the Emperesse As touching Arthur King Richardes nephevve Vt autem pax ista suÌ„ma dilectio tam multiplici quam arctiori vinculo connectatur praedictis curiae vestrae magnatiê° id ex parte vestra tractantibus Domino disponeÌ„te condiximus inter ArthuruÌ„ egregium DuceÌ„ Britanniae nepoteÌ„ nostruÌ„ haeredeÌ„ si forte sine prole obire nos coÌ„tigerit filiaÌ„ vestraÌ„ matrimonium coatrahendum c. In trastatu pacis inter Richa 1. TancreduÌ„ RegeÌ„ Siciliae Vide Reg. Houeden Richardum Canonicum S. Trinitatis Londiu daughter and heire of kinge Henry the first VVhereby the saide rule of the aduersaries is here fowly foiled And therefore they would for the maintenance of theyr pretensed Maxime catche some holde vpon Arthur the sonne of Ieffrey one of the sonnes of the saide Henry the seconde They say then like good and ioly Antyquaries that he was reiected from the Croune bycause he was borne out of the Realme That he was borne out of the Realme it is very true but that he was reiected from the Croune for that cause it is very false Neither haue they any authoritie to proue theyr vaine opinion in this pointe For it is to be proued by the Cronicles of that Realme that king Richarde the first vncle vnto the sayd Arthur taking his iourney toward Hierusalem declared the said Arthur as we haue declared before to be heire apparent vnto the Croune which would not haue bene if he had bene taken to be vnhable to receaue the Croune by reason of foraine birth And although king Iohn did vsurpe aswell upon the said king Richard the first his eldest brother as also vpon the sayd Arthur his nephewe yet that is no proof that he was reiected bycause he was borne out of the Realme Yf these menne could proue that then had they shewed some reason and president to proue their intent whereas hytherto they haue shewed none at all nor I am wel assured shall euer be able to shewe Thus may ye see gentle Reader that neither this pretensed Maxime of the lawe set forth by the Aduersaries nor a great nomber more as general as this is whiche before I haue shewed can by any reasonable meanes be stretched to bind the Croune of England These reasons and authorities may for this time suffice to proue that the Croune of that Realme is not subiecte to the rules and the Principles of the common lawe neither can be ruled and tried by the same VVhiche thing being true all the obiections of the Aduersaries made against the title of Marie the Queene of Scotland to the succession of the Croune of that Realme are fully answered and thereby clearly wiped away Yet for further arguments sake and to the ende we might haue all matters sifted to the vttermost and therby all things made plaine let vs for this tyme somewhat yeelde vnto the Aduersaries admitting that the Title of the Croune of that Realme were to be examined and tried by the rules and principles of the common lawe and then let vs consider and examin further whether ther be any rule of the common lawe or els any statute that by good iust construction can seeme to impugne the said title of Marie the Queene of Scotland or no. For touching her lineal descente from king Henry the seuenth and by his eldest daughter as we haue shewed there is no man so impudent to denie VVhat is there then to be obiected among all the rules Maximes and iugements of the common law of that Realm Only one rule as a general Maxime is obiected against her And yet the same rule is so vntruely set forth that I can not well agree that it is any rule or Maxime of the common lawe of the Realme of England Their pretensed Maxime is whosoeuer is borne out of the realme of England and of father and mother not being vnder the obedience of the king of England A false Maxime set forth by the aduersaries 7. E. 4. fol. 28. 9. E. 4 fol. 5. 11. H. 4. fol. 25. 14. H. 4. fol. 10. cannot be capable to inherite any thing in England VVhiche rule is nothing true but altogether false For euery stranger and Alien is hable to purchace the inheritance of landes within that Realm as it may appeare in 7. 9. of king Edward the fourth and also in 11. 14. of king Henrie the fourth And although the same purchasse is of some men accounted to be to the vse of the king yet vntill such time as the king be intitled there vnto by matter of Record the inheritance remaineth in the Alien by the opinion of all men And so is a very Alien capable of inheritance within that Realme And then it must nedes fall out verye plainlye that this generall Maxime where vpon the aduersaries haue talked and bragged so muche is now become no rule of the common lawe of that Realme And if it be so then haue they vtered very many woordes to small purpose But yet let vs see further whether there be any rule or Maxime in the common lawe that may seeme any thing like to that rule wherevpon any matter may be gathered against the title of the said Marie Queene of Scotland There is one rule of the common lawe in woordes some what like vnto that whiche hath bene alleaged by the aduersaries VVhich rule is set forth and declared by a statute made anno 25. of king Edward the third VVhiche statute reciting the doubt that then was whether infants borne out of the allegeance of England should be hable to demaund any heritage within the same allegeance or no it was by the same statute ordeined that all infantes inheritours whiche after that time should be borne out of the allegeaÌ„ce of the king whose father and mother at the time of their birth were of the faith and allegeance of the king of England should enioy the same benefittes and aduantages to haue and holde heritage within the said allegeance
as other heires should VVhervpon it is to be gathered by dew iust cōstruction of the same statute and hath bene heretofore commonly taken that the common lawe alwayes was yet is that no persone born out of the allegeāce of the king of England whose father and mother were not of the same allegeance should be able to haue or demaund any heritage within the same algeance as heire to any person VVhiche rule I take to be the same supposed Maxime that the aduersaries do meane But to stretche it generally to all inheritāces as the aduersaries woulde seeme to do by any reasonable meanes can not be The statute of Edvv. 3. An. 25. touchetb inberitance not purchase 11. H. 4. fol. 25. For as I haue said before euery stranger and Alien borne may haue and take inheritance as a purchaser And if an Alien do Marie a woman inheritable the inheritance therby is both in the Alien also in his wife the Alien thereby a purchaser No man doubteth but that a Denizon maye purchase landes to his owne vse but to inherit landes as heire to any person within the allegeance of England he can not by any meanes So that it seemeth very plaine that the said rule bindeth also Denyzons doth onely extend to Descentes of inheritance and not to the hauing of any lande by purchse Now will we then consider whether this rule by any reasonable cōstruction can extend vnto the Lady Marie the Queene of Scotland for and concerning her title to the Croune of England It hath bene said by the Aduersaries that she was borne in Scotland whiche realm is out of the allegeance of England her father and mother not being of the same allegeāce therfore by the said rule she is not inheritable to the Croune of England Though I might at the beginning very wel and orderly deny the consequent of this argumente yet I wil first examin the Antecedent euen by the cōmon opinion and sentence of English men then will I consider vpon the consequent And this I intend of purpose only to discouer the improuidence of the aduersaries whiche in a matter where they couet most to looke vnto them selues there they least of all prouide for the warrantize of theyr cause by their owne pretensed lawes of the Realme of England But I mynde not hereupon so to ouer rule the matter as any preiudice may thereby be created against the Kynges of Scotland who haue alwayes kept and still doe kepe and enioye with a plain profession most iust clame in their owne right ouer their subiectes a supreme authoritie power not depending by any lawe right or custome vpon any other Prince or potentate in the world VVell then to come to the Antecedent so it is that the Queene of Scotland was borne in Scotland it must nedes be graunted but that Scotland is out of the allegeance of England though the sayde Queene and all her subiectes doe iustlye affirme the same yet there is a verie greate number of men in England both learned and others whiche are not of that opinion but earnestly auouche the contrary being led persuaded therunto as they say by diuerse Histories Registers Recordes and Instruments remayninge in the Treasurie of that Realme wherin is mentioned as they also saye that the Kynges of Scotland haue acknouleged the Kyng of England to be the superiour Lorde ouer the Realme of Scotland haue done homage and fealtie for the same VVhich being true though all Scotsmen denie it as Iustlie they may for the homage fealtie whiche those men speake of was not exhibited nor done in any such respect as they surmise but in consideration of the tenures of certein Segnories Lands tenements hereditaments lyeing in Northumberland Cumberland other Shyres of England whiche now the Kinges of Scotland want and then did enioye holde of the Kyng of England As cōmonlie it is sene in sondrie parts of Christindome Kyngs and Princes hauyng distinct and absolute regiments not depending of any other potentate to holde neuerthelesse one of an other diuerse landes townes and countries lyeing within the marches of the one or the others dominions But admit it to be true whiche these men doe so auouche then Scotlande must nedes be accompted within the allegeance of England euen by their owne lawes of the same Realme and by the common opinion of their owne nation And although sins the tyme of Kinge Henry the sixt none of the Kinges of Scotlande haue done the said seruice vnto the Kinges of England yet that is no reason in the lawe of England to saye that therefore the Realme of Scotland at the tyme of the birth of the sayd Ladie Marie Queene of Scotlande being in the thirtie and fourth yeare of the raigne of the late Kinge Henrie the eight was out of the allegeance of the Kinges of England For the lawe of that Realme is very plain that though the Tenant do not his seruice vnto the Lorde yet hath not the Lord thereby lost his Seignorie The Lorde loseth not his seignorie though the tenante doth not his seruice For the lande still remaineth within his Fee Seignorie that notwithstanding But peraduenture some will obiecte and saye that by this reason France should likewise be said to be within the allegeance of England forasmuch as the possessiō of the Croune of France hath bene within a litle more then the space of one hundred yeares nowe last past laufully vested in the Kinges of England whose right and title still remaineth To that obiection it may be answered that there is a great differēce betwene the right title which the kings of England clame to the Realm of Frāce the right title which they clame to the Realme of Scotlād For although it be true that the kings of Englād haue bene lawfully possessed of the Croune of France yet during such time as they by vsurpation of others are dispossessed of the said Realme of Fraunce the same Realme by no meanes can be said to be within their allegeance especially considering how that syns the time of vsurpation the people of France haue wholy forsaken their allegeance and subiectiō which they did owe vnto the kings of England haue geuen submitted them selues vnder the obediēce allegeāce of the frēsh But as for the Realme of Scotlande it is otherwise For the Title whiche the Kinges of England by the opinion of these men may clame to the Realme of Scotland is not in the possession of the lande and Croune of Scotlande but onely in the seruice of homage and fealtie for the same And though the Kinges of Scotland many yeres haue intermitted to doe the said homage fealtie vnto the Kinges of Englande yet for all that the Kinges of Scotland can not by any reason or lawe be called vsurpers and vniust possessors And thus all indifferente men not ledd by affections may well see by the recordes testimonies of
suche is their skill that this statute touching Infantes de Roy was made for the great doubte more in them than in other persones touching their inheritance to their Auncestours For being then a Maxime saie they in the lawe that none could inherite to his Auncestours being not of father and mother vnder the obedience of the king seing the king him selfe could not be vnder obedience it plainely seemed that the kinges children were of farre worse condition than others quite excluded And therefore they saie that this statute was not to geue them any other priuilege but to make them equall with other And that therefore this statute touching the Kinges children standeth rather in the superficial parte of the woorde than in any effect Nowe among other thinges they saye as we haue shewed before that this word Infantes de Roy in this statute mentioned There vvas no doubt made of the Kinges children borne beyonde the seas must be taken for the children of the first degree whiche they seeme to proue by a note taken out of M. Rastal But to this we answer that these men swetely dreamed when they imagined this fonde and fantasticall expositiō And that they shewed them selues very infants in lawe and reason For this was no Maxime or at least not so certaine before the making of this statute whiche geueth no new right to the kinges children nor answereth any doubt touching them and their inheritance but this it saieth that the law of the Croune of England is and alwaies hath bene which lawe saith the king say the Lordes say the Commons we allowe affirme for euer that the kinges children shal be hable to inherite the landes of their Auncesters wheresoeuer they be borne All the doubt was for other persones as appeareth euidētly by the tenour of the statute whether by the cōmon law they being born out of the allegeance of the king were heritable to their Auncestours And it appeareth that the aduersaries are driuē to the hard wall when they are faine to catch holde vpō a selie poore marginal note of M. Rastal of the kinges children not of the kings childrens childrē VVhich yet nothing at al serueth their purpose touching this statute But they or the Printer or whosoeuer he be as they drawe out of the text many other notes of the matter therin cōprised so vpon these French wordes Les enfants de Roy they note in the Margent The Kinges Children but how farre that worde reacheth they saie neither more nor lesse Neither it is any thing preiudicial to the said Queenes right or Title whether the said wordes Infants ought to be taken strictly for the first degree or farther enlarged For if this statute toucheth only the succession of the Kings children to their Auncestours for other inheritance and not for the Croune as moste men take it and as it may be as we haue said very well taken and allowed then doeth this supposed Maxime of forain borne that seemeth to be gathered out of this statute nothing anoy or hinder the Queene of Scotlandes Title to the Croune as not therto apperteining On the other side if by the inheritance of the Kings children the Croune also is meant yet neither may we enforce the rule of foraine borne vpō the kings childrē which are by the expresse wordes of the statute excepted neither enforce the word Infants to the first degree onely for such reasons presidents and examples and other proouffes largely by vs before set forth to the contrarie seing that the right of the Croune falling vpon thē they may well be called the kings Children or at the lest the children of the Croune Ther is also one other cause why though this statute reach to the Croune This statute toucheth not the Q. of Scotlād as one not borne beyond the seas and may and ought to be expounded of the same the said Queene is out of the reach and compasse of the said statute For the said statute can not be vnderstanded of any persones borne in Scotlande or wales but onely of persones borne beyond the sea out of the allegeance of the king of England that is to witte France Flādres such like For England Scotland and wales be all within one Territorie and not diuided by any sea And all old Recordes of the law concerning seruice to be done in those two Countries haue these words Infra quatuor Maria within the fower seas which must nedes be vnderstād in Scotland wales aswel as in England bicause they be all within one continent compassed with fower seas And likewise be many auncient statutes of that Realme written in the Normane French whiche haue these wordes deins les quatre mers that is within the fower seas Nowe concerninge the statute the title of the same is of those that are born beyond the sea the doubt moued in the corps of the said statute is also of childrē borne beyond the sea out of the allegeance Vide statuta VValliae in magna Charta VVales vvas vnder the allegeance of England before it vvas vnited to the Croune with diuers other branches of the statute tending that way VVherby it seemeth that no part of the statute toucheth these that are born in VVales or Scotlād And albeit at this time and before in the reigne of Edward the first VVales was fully reduced annexed vnited to the proper Dominion of England yet was it before subiected to the Croune and King of England as to the Lorde and Seigniour VVherefore if this statute had bene made before the time of the said Edward the first it semeth that it could not haue bene stretched to VVales no more then it can now to Scotland I doe not therefore a litle meruaile that euer these men for pure shame could finde in their hartes so childishly to wrangle vpon this word Infants and so openly to detort depraue and corrupt the common law and the Actes of Parlament And thus may you see gentle Reader that nothing can be gathered either out of the saide supposed generall rule or Maxime or of any other rule or Principle of the lawe that by any good and reasonable construction can seeme to impugne the title of my said soueraign Lady Mary now Queene of Scotland of and to the Croune of the Realme of England as is aforesaid VVe are therefore now last of all to consider whether there be any statute or acte of Parlament that doth seeme either to take away or preiudice the title of the said Queene And bycause touching the foresaid mentioned statute of the 25. yere of King Edward the thirde being onely a declaration of the common lawe we haue already sufficiently answered we will passe it ouer and consider vpon the statute of 28 and 35. of King Henrye the eight being the onely shoteanker of all the Aduersaries whether there be any matter therein conteined or depending vpon the same that can by any meanes destroye or hurt the title of the said
wise shift but that the Acte without it muste perish and be of no valewe then say they wee vndoe whole Parlamentes aswel in Queene Maries time as in kings Henry the eightes time In Queene Maries time bicause she omitted the Style appointed by Parlamente Anno Henrici octaui tricesimo quinto An. H. 8.35 An. H. 8.33 21. In kinge Henries tyme by reason there was a statute that the kinges royal assent may be geuen to an Acte of Parlamente by his Letters Patentes signed with his hāde though he be not there personally And yet did the saied king supplie full ofte his consente by the stampe only This yet notwithstanding the said Parlamentes for the omission of these formes so exactely and precisely appointed are not destroyed and disannulled An ansvver by the vvay of reioinder to the same After this sorte in effecte haue the Aduersaries replied for the defence of the said pretensed will To this we will make our reioynder saye Firste that our principal matter is not to ioyne an issewe whether the saide kinge made and ordeyned any sufficient will or no. VVe leaue that to an other time But whether he made any Testamēt in suche order and forme as the statute requireth VVherefore if it be defectiue in the said forme as wee affirme it to be were it otherwise neuer so good and perfect though it were exemplified by the great Seale and recorded in Chancerie and taken commonly for his VVil and so accomplished it is nothing to the principal question It resteth then for vs to cōsider the weight of the aduersaries presumptions whereby they would inforce a probabilitie that the Testamēt had the foresaid requisite forme Yet first it is to be considered what presumptions and of what force number do occurre to auoide and frustrate the Aduersaries presumptions and all other like Diuers presumptions reasons against this supposed vvill VVe say then there occurre many likelyhoddes many presumptions many great and weightie reasons to make vs to thinke that as the king neuer had good and iuste cause to minde enterprise suche an Acte as is pretended so likewise he did enterprise no such Acte in deede I deny not but that ther was such authoritie geuen him neither I deny but that he might also in some honorable sort haue practised the same to the honour and wealthe of the Realme and to the good contentation of the same Realme But that he had either cause or did exercise the said authoritie in suche strange dishonorable sort as is pretended I plainely denie For being at the time of this pretēsed will furnished and adorned with issue the late king Edward and the Ladies Marie and Elizabeth their state and succession being also lately by Acte of Parlament established what neede or likelyhod was there for the king then to practise such newe deuises as neuer did I suppose any King in that Realme before and fewe in any other byside And where they were practised commonly had infortunate and lamentable successe VVhat likelyhode was there for him to practise such deuises especially in his later daies when wisdome the loue of God and his Realm should haue bene moste ripe in him that were likely to sturre vppe a greater fier of greeuouse contention and wofull destruction in England then euer did the deadly faction of the read Rose the white lately by the incorporation and vnion of the house of Yorke and Lancastre in the person of his father through the mariage of Ladye Elizabeth eldest daughter of King Edwarde the fourth moste happily extinguished and buried And though it might be thought or said that there vould be no such cause of feare by reason the matter passed by Parlament yet could not he be ignorāt that neither Parlamēts made for Hēry the fourth or cōtinuance of twoo Descentes which toke no place in geuing any Title touching the Croune in King Henry the sixt nor Parlamentes made for King Richard the third nor Parlaments of attainder made against his father could either preiudice his fathers right or releaue other against such as pretended iust right and title And as he could not be ignorant therof so it is not to be thought that he would abuse the great confidence put vpon him by the Parlament and disherite without any apparent cause the next roial blood and thinke all thinges sure by the colour of Parlamēt The litle force whereof against the right inheritour he had to his fathers and his owne so ample benefit so lately and so largely sene and felt And yet if he minded at any time to preiudice the said Lady Marie Queene of Scotland of all times he would not haue done it then when all his care was by all possible meanes to contriue and compasse a mariage betwene his sonne Edward and the said Lady and Queene Surely he was to wise of him selfe and was furnished with to wise Counsailours to take such an homely way to procure and purchase the said mariage by And least of all can we say he attempted that dishonorable disherison for any speciall inclinatiō or fauour he bare to the French Queene his sisters children For there haue bene of his neere priuie Counsaile that haue reported that the King neuer had any great liking of the mariage of his sister with the Duke of Suffolke who maried her first priuily in France and afterward openly in England And as it is said had his pardon for the said priuy mariage in writing Howesoeuer this matter goeth certeine it is that if this pretensed will be true he transferred and transposed the reuersion of the Croune not only from the Queene of Scotland from the Ladie Leneux and their issue but euen from the Lady Francis the Ladie Eleonour also daughters to the Frēche Queene whiche is a thing in a manner incredible and therefore nothing likely I must now gentle Reader put thee in remembrance of two other most pregnant and notable cōiectures and presumptions For among all other inconueniences and absurdities that do and may accompanie this rash vnaduised acte by this pretensed wil inconsiderately mainteined it is principally to be noted The supposed vvill is preiudicial to the Croune of England for the clame of the Croune of France that this Acte geueth apparent iust occasion of perpetual disherison of the Style Title of France incorporated and vnited to the Croune of England For whereby do or haue the Frenchemen hitherto excluded the kinges of that Realme claming the Croune of France by the title of Edward the third fallen vpon him by the right of his mother other than by a politike and ciuil law of their owne that barreth the female frō the right of the Croune And what doeth this pretensed Act of king Henrie but iustifie and strengthen their quarel and ouerthrow the foundatiō bulworke wherby the kings of England maintene their foresaid title and clame For if they may by their municipial lawe of England
he meant to geue the same by his wil could not enioye it by the lawe VVherevpon ye may plainely see not onely the great vnlikelihod that King Henry the eight would make any such wil with such slender aduise but also that by the limitation of the said will the succcession of the Croune is made more vncertaine and doubtfull then it was before the making of the said Actes of Parlament VVhich is contrary to the meaning and intent of the said Actes and therefore without any sufficient warrant in law But peraduenture some here will say that although these daungers vncertainties might haue ensewed vpō the limitation of the said wil yet forasmuch as they haue not happened neither be like to happen they are therefore not to be spoken of Ye as verely it was not to be omitted For although these things haue not happened and therefore the more tolerable yet for as much as they might haue happened by the limitation of the said supposed will contrary to the meaning of the said Actes the will can not by any meanes be said to be made according to the meaning and intent of the makers of the said statutes And therefore in that respect the said will is insufficient in lawe And to aggrauate the matter farther ye shall vnderstand of great inconueniences and imminent daungers which as yet are likely to ensue if that supposed will should take place It is not vnknowen but that at the time of the making of the said will the said Lady Frācis had no issue male but onely three daughters betwene her Henrie Duke of Suffolke Afterward in the time of the late soueraigne Lady Queene Marie the said Duke of Suffolke was attainted and suffered accordingly After whose death the said Ladie Francis to her great dishonour and abasing of her selfe toke to husbande one Adrian Stokes who was before her seruant a man of very meane estate and vocation and had issue by him VVhiche issue if it were a sonne be also yet liuing by the wordes of the said supposed will is to inherite the Croune of that Realme before the daughters betwene her and the said late Duke of Suffolke begotten whiche thing was neither intended nor meant by the makers of the said Actes VVho can with any reason or cōmō sense thinke that al the states of the Realme assembled together at the said Parlament did meane to geue authoritie to King Henry the eight by his letters Patents or last will to disherit the Queene of Scotland linially descended of the blood royal of that Realme and to appoint the sonne of Adrian Stokes then a meane seruing man of the Duke of Suffolks to be King Gouernour ouer that noble Realme of England The inconueniences whereof as also of the like that might haue followed of the pretensed Mariage of M. Keies the late Sergeante Porter I referre to the graue considerations and iudgementes of the honorable and worshipfull of that Realme Some peraduenture will say that King Henry the eight meant by his will to dispose the Croune vnto the Heires of the body of the said Ladie Francis by the said Duke lawfully begotten not vnto the heires by any other person to be begotten VVhich meaning although it might very hardly be gathered vpon the said supposed will yet can not the same be without as great inconueniences as the other For if the Croune should now remaine vnto the heires of the bodie of the said Ladie Francis by the said Duke begotten then should it remaine vnto two daughters ioyntly they both being termed and certainly accompted in law but one heire And by that meanes the state and gouernment of that Realme should be changed from the auncient Monarchie into the gouernement of many For the Title of the Ladie Francis being by way of remainder whiche is cōpted in law a ioynt purchase doth make all the issue female inheritable a like and can not go according to the aunciēt law of a descent to the Croune which is that the Croune by descent must go to the eldest daughter only as is aforesaid For great differences be in law where one cometh to any Title by descent and where as a purchassor And also if the one of those issues female dye then were her heire in the Title as a seueral tenant in tayle And so there should follow that so many daughters so many general Gouernors so might their issue being heirs femals make the gouernmēt grow infinite VVhich thing was most farre frō the meaning of the makers of that Acte of Parlament VVhat if the said King had by his last will disposed that realme into two or three parts diuiding the gouernement thereof to three persons to rule as seueral Kinges as for example wales vnto one the Northe partes vnto an other the South partes vnto the third and by that meanes had miserably rent that Realme into partes Had this bene according to the entent and meaning of the said Acte of Parlament Or had it bene a good and sufficient limitation in law No verily I thinke no man of any reasonable vnderstanding wil so say And no more can he either say or thinke of the remainder limited vnto the heires of the body of the said Lady Francis by the said supposed will Now to complete and finish this our Treatise touching the Queene of Scotlāds Title to the succession of the Croune as we haue done so let vs freely and liberally graunt the Aduersaries that whiche is not true that is that the said supposed wil was signed with the kings own hand Let the heires of the Lady Frācis come forth in Gods name lay forth to the world their demaund supposed right against the said Q. of Scotlāds interest The Queene on the other side to fortifie strēghten her clame layeth foorth to the open sight of all the worlde her iust title and interest signed and alwaies a fore this time allowed not onely as with the Seales but with the othes also of al the kings that euer were in England taken at the time of their Coronation for the continuance of the lawes of that noble Realme of England signed and allowed I say almost of all the world by sides yea signed with God and natures owne fingers Her right is as open and as clere as the bright Sonne Now to darken and shadow this glorious light what doe the heires of the said Ladie Frācis or others bringe foorth to ground their iust clame and demaund vpon VVhen all is done they are faine to runne and catche hold vpō king Henry the eightes written will signed with his owne hāde VVel let them take as good handfast thereon as they can but yet lette them shewe the said Queene the said original will It is well knowen that they themselues haue said that that to doe they can not Yet let them at least lay forth some authentical record of the same It is also notorious that they can not If then the foundation of
obiections whiche your aduersaries pretend to the contrarie And this trauaille longe agoe whiles I was Ambassadour in England I dyd willynglye take in hand aswell thereby to wynne the good willes of many vnto you as for the honour and generall commoditie of your Countrie VVherein at that time I had muche conference with some of the most expert and skillfullest Iudges best practized counseilers towardes the lawes of that land and after many discourses and muche debatinge I clearly sifted owt their opinions and Iudgementes touching this matter And not longe after vpon mature deliberation whē I had well reuolued these thinges in my mind I thought it euery waye agreable to my deutie towarde your Maiesties your Countrie to contriue in some litle volume what I had learned in so longe tyme being also hereunto induced by the persuasion of diuerse Christian Princes whome after my departure out of England coming to visit them I had made acquainted with this matter whiche they were glad to hear and for their better instruction desirous to be infourmed therof at more length by writing VVherevpon first to satisfie the honorable meanynge of those noble personages I compiled and published a Treatise of this matter in latin And now further to accomplishe my deutie in defence of your Royall Dignities and to setle the myndes of the wauering communaltie and for the generall commoditie of all suche as haue any interest in this matter I haue sett forthe this Treatise in English And I verilye hope suche is your princelie good meanyng my most vndoubted Soueraignes that you will accept in good parte this my trauaile as a testimonie of my duetifull good will reuerence seruice to your Maiesties and that you will construe my intention and aduise to this attempte as in your iudgement agreable to the weight of so great a cause and allowe thereof for the manyfold commodities that therehence may arise Now then as a right and laufull combination of manye Regions by iust title of succession belongyng to you most manifestlie argueth and conuinceth a Regall Soueraigntie deriued vnto you by many famouse kynges your Maiesties Auncestors so doeth the same require and exact of you an vnion and coniunction of mindes and a full consent in the vertue and religion of your forefathers For nothinge can be more agreable with the name and title of a king and with the honour and renoume of so noble a successiō as so fortunatly procedeth from suche a mother to suche a sonne than that with suche an vndoubted title right to rule a kyngdome there be annexed an vniforme profession in sincere Religion To whiche ende as the mother hitherto most religiouslie foloweinge the vertue faith and pietie of her noble progenitoures hathe euermore showed suche constancie as that Sexe scarsely beareth so the yong kyng her sonne in succession goeng with her must diligently foresee that in a sincere profession of one selfe same Catholik religion he be not behynd her but that as he hath truely imitated all her other vertues wherein she woonderfully excelleth her own selfe so he resemble her in true faith and in vniformitie of the Catholique Religion And thus the mother can haue no occasion offered her to remitt any part of her true loue and affection towardes her sonne but by daily encrease of naturall affectiōs betwene them she will so answer hym in courteouse kyndnesse as thoughe she be forestalled of his presence yet shall she enioye great comfort of hym in his absence in so muche as all the world at home and abrode shall admire and wonder at their laudable emulation in offices of naturall zeale and pietie Yea thus it will fall out that your own people moued by your example will induce one an other to peace and amitie and freely of their own accorde without any contention will offer vppe vnto you suche kyngdomes regions prouinces as are or shal be due vnto you by right and desire nothinge more than to be vnder the dominion of them whome they see in one mynde faythe and religion with good lawes and true Iustice moderate their common wealthe VVhiche kyngdomes and the Subiectes thereof God the kynge of all kynges which ruleth the hartes of all Princes graunt you grace well to gouerne to the glorye of his holy name to the propagation of his holy churche and to the maintenance of common peace and tranquillitie Amen A PREFACE CONTEYNING THE ARGVMENT OF THIS TREATISE VVITH THE CAVSES mouyng the Author to wryte the same THE deepe prouidence of Almightie God who of nothinge created all thinges most euidently in this poynt showeth it selfe that by his power ineffable he hath not onlye created all thinges but by the same power hath also endewed euery liuyng creature with a speciall guyft grace to continue to renewe and to preserue eache his owne kynde But in this consideration the condition of man kynde amonge and aboue all earthly thinges hath a pearlesse prerogatiue of witt and reason wherewith he onlye is of God graciously indued and adourned Man by the guyft of vvitt reasō hath a greate fresight of thinges to come For by theese excellent guiftes and graces of witt and reason he doeth not onlye prouide for his present necessitie and sauegarde as doe naturally after their sort all brute beastes and euery other thinge voide of reason but also pregnantlie discoursinge from cause to cause and prudentlie applyeng their seuerall courses euentes he gayneth a greate foresight of the daungers and perilles that many yeres after may happen either to him selfe or to his Countrey and then by diligence and carefull prouision doeth inuent some apt and meete remedies for the eschewinge of suche mischiefes as might outragyously afterward occurre And the greater the fear is of more imminent mischief so muche more care and speedier diligence is vsed to preuent and cutt of the same And it is most certaine by the confession of all the world that this care whiche I speake of ought principally to be imployed of euerie man as oportunitie serueth to this ende that therby the Authoritie of the Prince may be kept whole and sound the publik weal of his countrey assured and the cōmon peace tranquillitie of bothe preserued Subiects ought to loue their kinge and to knovv the heyr apparent to the Croune For the obteining whereof as there are many braunches of policie to be desired so one special parte is for subiectes louinglye and reuerentlye to honour and obedientlie to serue their Soueraigne which for the time hath the rule and gouernement the next to foreknowe to whome they owe their alleageāce after the deceasse of their present prince and Gouernour VVhiche being once certain and assuredly knowen procureth when tyme doeth come readie and seruiceable obedience with great comfort in the mean while and afterwarde vniuersal reast and quietnesse of all good Subiectes as on the contrary part throughe discord variance and diuersitie of mindes and opinions about a Successour the
matter groweth to faction and from factiō bursteth out to plain and open hostilitie wherevpō foloweth passing great perilles and oftentimes detestable alterations and subuersions of the plublick state For the better auoyding of suche and lyke inconueniences albeit at the beginning Princes reigned not by descent of blood and succession VVhy all the vvorld almost embraceth succession of princes rather than election but by choyse and election of the worthiest the world was for the most part constreyned to reiect and abandon election and so oftentimes in stead of a better and woorthier to take for their Gouernour some certain issue ofspring of one family though otherwyse perhappes not so mete VVhich defecte is so supplied partly by the greate benefit of the good reast and quyetnesse that the people vniuersally enioye by this course of succession and partly by the industrie and trauail of graue and sage personages whose counseil Princes doe vse in their affaires that the whole world in a manner these many thousand yeres hath embrased successiō by blood rather than by election And all politike Princes wanting issue of their own bodies to succede them haue euer had a speciall care foresight for auoyding of ciuil dissention that the people allwayes myght knowe the true and certain heyr apparent of the Croune specially when there appeared any lykelyhode of varitie of opinions or factions to ensue about the true and laufull succession in gouernement The care of English kinges to haue the successour to be knovvn This care and foresight doeth manifestly appear to haue bene not only in manye Princes of forain Countreis but also in the kynges of England aswell before as after the Conquest namely in S. Edward kyng of England that holie Confessour by declaring and appoynting Edgar Atheling his nephews fonne Flores hist anno 1057 to be his heyre as also in kynge Richard the first who before he interprised his Iourney to Ierusalem Richard Chanon of the Trinitie ī Londō assembled his Nobilitie and Commons together and by their consentes declared Arthure sonne of his brother Duke of Britain to be his next heir and Successour of the Croune Of whiche Arthure flores hist anno 1190 Poli. l. 14. as also of the sayd Edgar Atheling we will speake more hereafter This care also had king Richard the second what time by authoritie of Parlament he declared for heir apparent of the Croune the Lord Edmond Mortymer that Maried Philip daughter and heyr of his vnkle Leonell Polid. l. 20. duke of Clarence And to descend to later times the late kyng Henry the eight shewed as it is knowen his prudence and zelous care in this behalfe before his last voyage in to Fraunce And nowe if almightie God should as we be all bothe prince and others subiecte to mortall chaunces once bereaue the Realme of England of their present Queene the hartes and mindes of men being no better nor more firmely setled and stayed towardes the expectation of a certain succession than they seme now to be then woe alas it woundeth my very hart euen once to thinke vpon the imminent and almost ineuitable perilles of that noble Realme being lyke to be ouerwhelmed with the raiging roaring waues stormes of mutuall discorde and to be consumed with the terrible fire of ciuil dissention The feare whereof is the more by reason that already in these later yeres some flames of this horrible fire haue sparkled and flushed abroad some part of the rage of those fluddes haue beaten vpon the Englishe shores I mean the hote contention that hath there bene sturred in so many places and among so many persones Of bookes also dispersed abroode so many wayes fashioned framed as either depraued affection peruersely lusted or zelous defense of truthe sincerely moued men Seing therfore that there is iust cause of fear and of great daunger lykely to happen by this varietie of mennes myndes and opinions so diuersely affected aswell of the meaner sort of menne as of greate personages I take it to be the parte of euery naturall Englishe man of suche as fauoure them to labour and trauaile eache man for his possibilitie and for suche talent as God hath gyuen hym that this so imminent a mischiefe may be in conuenient time preuented VVe see what witt policye paynes and charges men employe with dammes weares and all kynde of ingenious deuises to prouide that the sea or other riuers doe not ouerflowe or burst the bankes in suche places as are most subiecte to suche daunger VVe knowe also what politike prouision is made in many good Cities and townes that no daungerous fires do aryse through negligence and that the furie therof if any happen may speedilye be repressed with diligence VVherein Augustus the Emperour among other his famours actes is woorthely commended honored for appointing in Rome an ordinary wache of seuen companies in seuerall places to preuent suche mischiefes as come by fyre being hereunto induced by reason that the Citie was set on fire in seuen seuerall places in one daye And shall not then euery man for his part and vocation haue a vigilant care and respect to extinguishe and quenche fuche a fyre alreadye bursten owt as may if the matter be not wyselye looked vnto subuert distroy and consume not one Citie onlye but also a whole Realme Countrye VVhiche to suppresse one ready and commodiouse waye as I thinke is that the Countrey men people of that nation may throughly vnderstand and knowe from time to time in what persone the right of succession of the Croune of that Realme doeth stande and remayne For now many men partly through ignorance of the sayd right title partly through sinister persuasion of some lewd pamphlets whereunto they haue too lightly giuen credit are seduced and caried away quite from the right opinion and good meaning whiche once they had conceiued and from the reuerence and duetie that they other wyse woulde and shoulde haue VVhiche corruption of Iudgement and opinion I doe hartely wishe to be plucked out of the hartes and mindes of men and shall in this Treatise doe my best indeuoure with moste strong reasons and prooses to remoue the same not presuminge vpon my selfe that I am better able than all others this to doe but vpon duety and zeal to open a waye fot the knoulege of trueth whiche by so many indirect meanes is restreined obscured and persecutde after reading and vewing of suche bookes and the argumentes therof as haue bene set forth by the aduersaires to the contrarie whiles I was in England Ambassador for my most gratiouse Soueraigne ladye the Quene of Scotland I attempted this woork not vnrequested of some noble personages then of great accompte nor without the aduise counsail and Iudgement of some verie skillfull in the customes lawes and statutes of that Realme VVherein I verily hope to showe suche good matter for euident demōstration of the truth as semeth to me
sufficient to satisfie euery honest and indifferent persone and able to persuade all such as are not obstinatly bent to their own partiall affections or not gyuen ouer to some sinister meanyng and factiouse dealing TO THE NOBILITIE AND people of England and Scotland A Poesie made by T. V. Englishman Dravve neare vvith heedfull eyes this booke peruse VVho that desires assuredlie to knovve Those iust decrees that English people vse For rightfull heyres to whom the Croune dothe grovve VVith gloriouse Rases of so riche a soyle And golden bondes of most assured peace VVhiche after vvarres and many a bloodie broyle Hath long time lasted and dothe still encrease By Henries vvyfe vvhom Stories seuenth doe name From vvhose renoumed stocke and princelie straine Marie novv present Quene of Scotland came And Iames her sonne as king to rule and raigne Vnder that Pole vvhiche vve the Northern call This ladie by her predecessors right Dothe looke the Englishe Croune to her shall fall Vertue to defend and people by her Might To guyde in peace vvhen Henries heyres are dead VVhiche vvas the eight in great renoume of late For then vvith right pretence vvho can procede To gayn saye her and spoyle her of her state And right to beare the svvaye in Englishe land But lest the simple man should grovve in doubt VVhat lavve allovves her for their heyr to stand Lesley vvell knovveing all the cause throughout As one that loues his Quene and common peace By busie toyle hathe brought this thing aboute And dothe his best to make false practise cease You Britaine 's therfore vvith attentiue heede Dravve neer and reape the croppe of this his seede Esteme his vvorke and vveighe his vvarninges vvyse That telles the truthe still one in vvoorde and mynde Regarde the right of her vvho once may ryse And rule in state your Quene to heauens resigned That onlie Realm is in most happie state VVhiche beares no Tyrannes rule nor blody band And whose renowmed Prince doeth euell hate And rules in peace the people of her land A TREATISE TOVVCHING THE RIGHT TITLE AND interest asvvell of the most excellent Princesse Marye Queene of Scotland as of the most noble Kyng Iames her Graces sonne to the succession of the Croune of England And first touching the Genealogie or pedegrue of suche Competitors as pretend title to the same Croune A DECLARATION OF THE TABLE folovveing touching the rase progenie of suche persones as descēding from the Princely families of Yorke and Lacastre doe eyther Iustlye clame or vniustlye aspire vnto the Croune of England set foorthe for this speciall intent that all men may clearlye see as by a plain demonstration and by the best proofe that can be of a true and laufull succession hovv the most Graciouse Princesse Marye Queene of Scotland and from by her the most noble King Iames the sixt of that name her Graces sonne ought Iustlye to barre all others contending to intrude them selues into the Royal Throne of the Realme of England before their time CERTAINE IT IS Queene of Scots right heir apparent of the Croune of England and assuredlie tried and knowen to all men that after the decease of Elizabeth now Queene of England without laufull yssue of her bodie the Soueraigne Gouernement of that Realme by right and iust title of a laufull succession is to remayn and come to Marie the most noble Queene of Scotland and from her to the sayd Kyng Iames. And this is suche an vndoubted truthe as the Aduersaries them selues are not able to denye it yf they will cast away all partiall affection of priuate quarrelles and sincerely discouer their owne consciences For A vvomā may haue the kingdome of England to let passe as sufficiently by others aunswered and clearly confuted that absurde paradox heretical assertion blowen abrode by vndiscrete and seditiouse libells against the regiment of women I make this full accoumpt and reckening as of a thing most clearly knowne and confessed in the hartes and myndes of euery true English man and as agreable with the lawes of God and nature that for default of heyr male inheritable to the Croune of England the next heir female in an ordinary course of inheritance succession is to be inuited called to the laufull possession of the Croune And that aswell by the auncient common lawe and custome of England yet in force as also by the Statutes and actes of Parliaments of that Realm and by the vsuall construction and continuall practise of the same In like manner it is euident and playne that the right noblye renoumed Princesse of famouse memorye Lady Margaret some tyme Queene of Scotland eldest daughter of the seuenth Henry King of England and of his most noble wyfe Queene Elizabeth the vndouted heir of the howse of Yorke was maried to Iames King of Scotland the fowerth of that name by whome she had one only sonne called king Iames the fift that the said most excellent Princesse Marye now Queene of Scotland is the sole daughter of the same King Iames the fift VVherupon it falleth owt that after the decesses of the heirs males of the bodies of the sayed kyng Henry the seuenth and Queene Elizabeth his sayd wyfe whithout laufull issue of their bodies then the right title and interest to the Croune of England ought to descend Margaret King Hēry the seuenth his eldest daughter graundmother to the Scottish Queene and come by a laufull course of inheritaunce and succession first before all others to the sayd most gracious Lady Marie Queene of Scotland as next heir in a laufull descent from her sayd graundmother the sayd Queene Margaret eldest daughter of the sayd King Henry the seuenth and of Queene Elizabeth his sayd wyfe Now this is a briefe narration of suche an vndoubted truthe as should nede no further explication if men were deuoutlye inclined to credit a truthe But because some men are by ambition so blynded caried away with their own phantasies as they mynd nothing more than with cōtentiouse quarrelles to obscure and deface this matter I must fet a further course and though the thing be playn enough of it selfe yet must it be delated with a larger discourse of many proofes experimentes and examples to the intent that all those Competitors and Chalengers whiche oppose them selues against her Maiesties right albeit of them selues they will not yeeld to reason may neuerthelesse be so conuinced and daunted as they shall haue nothing left to gaynsaye when the truthe of the cause shal be clearlye reuealed and sincerely layd open to the vewe of Princes and people of all nations Fyrst therefore I will set downe a Genealogie The argumēt of this vvorke and Pedegrue of the Kinges of England And I will deriue the same frome king Edward the thirde And so frome the most noble houses of Yorke and Lancastre in manner of an historie vntil these our dayes Then will I duelie examin suche argumētes as the Competitours
England that the Realme of Scotlande is within the allegeance of England And so is the AntecedeÌ„t or first proposition false And yet that maketh no proufe that the Realme of France likewise should nowe be sayde to be within the allegeance of the Kings of England by reason of the manifest and apparent difference before shewed But what if the antecedent were true as the aduersaries saye it is and all Scotsmen constantly affirme it to be Yet it is very plaine that the sayde consequent and conclusion can not by any meanes be true The causes vvhy the Croune cannot be comprised vvithin the pretended Maxime and that principallye for three causes whereof one is for that neyther the Kinge nor the Croune not being specially mentioned in the said rule or pretended Maxime can be intended to be within the meaning of the same Maxime as we haue before sufficently proued by a great number of other suche like generall rules and Maximes of the lawes An other cause is for that the Croune can not be taken to be within the woordes of the said supposed Maxime and that for twoo respectes one is bicause the rule doth onely dishable Aliens to demaunde any heritage within the allegeance of England VVhiche rule can not be stretched to the demaunde of the Croune of England which is not with in the allegeance of England but is the verie allegeance it selfe As for a like example it is true that all the landes within the Kinges dominion are holden of the Kinge either mediatly or immediatly and yet it is not true that the Croune by whiche onely the Kinge hath his Dominion can be said to be holden of the King VVithout the Croune there can neither be King nor allegeance For without the Croune there can be neither King nor allegeance And so long as the Croune resteth onelye in demaunde not being vested in any persone ther is no allegeance at all So that the Croune can not be saide by any meanes to be within the allegeance of England and therfore not within the wordes of the said rule or Maxime The title of the Croune is also out of the wordes and meaning of the same rule in an other respect and that is bicause that rule doth onely dishable an Alien to demaund landes by descent as heire For it doth not extend vnto landes purchased by an Alien as we haue before sufficiently proued And then can not that rule extende vnto the Croune being a thinge incorporate the right wherof doth not descend according to the common course of priuate inheritance but goeth by succession 40. E. 3. fol. 10. 13. E. 3. Tiâ— Bref 264. 16. E. 3. iurans de sait 166. 17. E. 3. Tit. sâ—iâ—e sac 7. A Deane a Person a Priour being an Alien may demande lande in the right of his corporation An 3. R. 2. 6. C. 3. fo 21. tit droit 26. lib. Ass p. 34. 1â— li. Ass tit enfant 13. H. 8. fo 14. 7. E. 4. fol. 10. 16. E. 3. iurans de â—ait 9. H. 6. fol. 33. 35. H. 6. fol. 35. 5. E. 4 fol. 70. 49. li. Ass A. 88. 22. H. 6. fol. 31. 13. H. 8. fol. 14. as other corporations do No man doubteth but that a Prior Alien being no denizon might alwayes in time of peace demaund land in the right of his corporation And so likewise a Deane or a Person being Aliens no denizons might demaund lande in respecte of their corporations not withstanding the said supposed rule or Maxime as may appeare by diuerse booke cases as also by the statute made in the time of king Richard the secoÌ„d And although the Croune hath alwaies gone according to the common course of a Descent yeth doth it not properly descende but succede And that is the reason of the lawe that although the Kinge be more fauoured in all his doinges then any common person shal be yet can not the King by lawe auoide his grauntes Letters Patentes by reason of his Nonage as other infantes may doe but shall alwayes be said to be of full age in respect of his Croune euen as a Person Vicare or Deane or any other person incorporate shal be VVhiche can not by any meanes be said in lawe to be within age in respect of their corporations although the corporation be but one yere olde Bysides that the Kinge can not by the lawe auoide the Letters Patentes made by any vsurper of the Croune vnlesse it be by acte of Parlement no more then other persones incorporate shall auoide the grauntes made by one that was before wrongfullye in their places and romes whereas in Descentes of inheritance the lawe is otherwise For there the heire may auoide all estates made by the disseasour or abatour or any other persone whose estate is by lawe defeated VVhereby it doth plainely appeare that the King is incorporate vnto the Croune The King is alvvaies at full age in respecte of his Croune hath the same properly by succession and not by Descent onely And that is likewise an other reason to proue that the Kinge and the Croune can neither be sayde to be within the wordes nor yet with in the meaning of the sayde generall rule or Maxime The third and most principall cause of all is for that in the said statute wherupon the said supposed rule or Maxime is gathered The Kings childreÌ„ are expresly excepted from the surmised Maxime the children descendantes and descended of the blood royall by the wordes of Infantes de Roy are expresly excepted out of the sayd supposed rule or Maxime VVhiche wordes the aduersaries do muche abuse in restraining and construing them to extende but to the first degree onely whereas the same wordes may very well beare a more large ample interpretatioÌ„ And that for three causes coÌ„sideratioÌ„s Libe roruÌ„ ff de verborum signific First by the Ciuil lawe this word Liberi which the worde Infantes being the vsuall and originall worde of the statute written in the Frenche toÌ„gue counteruaileth doth comprehende by proper and peculiar signification not onely the children of the first degree L. Sed si de iÌ„ ius vocaÌ„ doinstit de haere ab intist but other descendants also in the lawe As for example where the lawe sayeth That he vvho is manumissed or made free shall not commence any Action against the children of the Patrone or manumissour vvithout licence L. Lucius ff de haere instit L. Iusta L. NatoruÌ„ L. LiberoruÌ„ de uerb signi L. 2. § si mater al S.C. Tertul there not onely the first degree but the other also are conteined The like is where the lawe of the twelue Tables saith The first place and roome of succession after the death of the parentes that die intestate is due to the children there the succession apperteineth as well to degrees remoued as to the first Yea in all causes fauourable as ours is this worde Filius a sonne conteinethe
ere the first yere of his vsurped reigne turned about he was spoiled and turned out of both Croune and his life withal Yea his vsurpatiō occasioned the cōquest of the whole realme by VVilliā Duke of Normandie bastard sonne to Robert the sixt Duke of the same And may you thinke al safe sound now from like dāger if you should tread the said wrong steppes with Harolde forsaking the right and high way of law and iustice VVhat shal I now speake of the cruel ciuil warres betwene king Stephen and king Henry the second whiche warres rose by reason that the said Henry was vniustly kept from the Croune dew to his mother Maude and to him afterwardes The pitiful reigne of the said Iohn who doth not lamēt with the lamentable losse of Normandie Aquitaine the possibilitie of the Dukedome of Britanie and with the losse of other goodly possessions in France whereof the Croune of England was robbed and spoiled by the vnlawfull vsurping of him against his nephew Arthur VVell let vs leaue these greuouse and lothsome remembrances let vs yet seeke if we may finde any later interpretatiō either of the said statute or rather of the common law for our purpose And lo the great goodnes and prouidence of God who hath if the foresaid exāples would not serue prouided a later but so good so sure apt mete interpretatiō for our cause as any reasonable hart may desire The interpretatiō directly toucheth our case I meane by the mariage of the Lady Margaret eldest daughter to King Hēry the vij vnto the fourth king Iames of Scotland and by the opinion of the same most prudent Prince in bestowing his said daughter into Scotlād a matter sufficient enough to ouerthrow all those cauilling inuētiōs of the aduersaries For what time King Iames the fourth sent his Ambassadour to King Henry the seuenth to obteine his good will to espouse the said Lady Margaret Polid. 26. there were of his Counsaile not ignorant of the lawes and Customes of the Realme that did not well like upon the said Mariage saying it might so fal out that the right title of the Croune might be deuolued to the Lady Margaret and her children and the Realme therby might be subiect to Scotland To the whiche the prudent and wise king answered King H. 7. vvith his Counsaile is a good interpretor of our present cause that in case any suche deuolution should happen it would be nothing preiudiciall to England For England as the chief and principal and worthiest parte of the I le should drawe Scotland to it as it did Normandie from the time of the Conquest VVhich answere was wonderfully well liked of all the Counsaile And so consequently the Mariage toke effect as appereth by Polydor the Historiographer of that Realme and suche a one as wrote the Actes of that time by the instruction of the king him selfe I say then the worthy wise Salomon foreseeing that such deuolution might happen was an interpretour with his prudente and sage Counsaile for our cause For els they neaded not to reason of any such subiection to Scotlande if the children of the Ladie Margaret might not lawfully inherite the Croune of England For as to her husband Englād could not be subiect hauing him selfe no right by this mariage to the Title of the Croune of that Realme VVherevpon I may well inferre that the said newe Maxime of these men whereby they would rule and ouer rule the successiō of Princes was not knowen to the said wise king neither to any of his Counsaile Or if it were yet was it taken not to reache to his blood royall borne in Scotlande And so on euery side the Title of my Soueraigne Lady Queene Marie is assured So that now by this that we haue said it may easely be seen by what light and slender cōsideration the aduersaries haue gone about to strayne the worde Infantes or children to the first degree only Of the like weight is their other consideration imagining and surmising this statute to be made bicause the king had so many occasions to be so oft ouer the sea with his spouse the Queene As though diuers kings before him vsed not oftē to passe ouer the seas As though this were a personal statute made of a special purpose and not to be taken as a declaration of the common law VVhiche to say is most directely repugnant and contrary to the letter of the said statute Or as though his children also did not very often repaire to outward Countries The mariages of King E. 3. sonnes as Iohn of Gaunt Duke of Lancastre that Maried Peters the king of Castiles eldest daughter by whose right he clamed the Croune of Castile as his brother Edmund Erle of Camhridge that maried the yongest daughter as Lionell Duke of Clarence that maried at Milaine Violant daughter and heir to Galeatius Duke of Milan But especialy Prince Edwarde whiche moste victoriously toke in battaile Iohn the French King and brought him into England his prisoner to the great triumphe and reioysing of the realme whose eldest sonne Edward that died in short time after was borne beyond the seas in Gascoine and his other sonne Richard that succeded his grandfather was borne at Burdeaux And as these noble King Edwardes sonnes maried with forainers so did they geue out their daughters in mariage to foraine Princes as the Duke of Lancaster his daughter Philip to the King of Portugall and his daughter Catherin to the king of Spaine his Neece Iohan daughter to his sonne Erle of Somerset was ioyned in mariage to the king of Scottes Iohan daughter to his brother Thomas of wodstocke Duke of Gloucester was Queene of Spaine and his other daughter Marie Duchesse of Britānie Now by these mennes interpretation none of the issue of all these noble women could haue enioyed the Croune of England when it had fallen to them though they had bene of the neerest roial blood after the death of their Aūcestours VVhich surely had bene against the auncient presidentes examples that we haue declared and against the common Lawe the whiche must not be thought by this Statute any thing taken away but only declared and against all good reason also For as the kings of England would haue thought that Realme greatly iniuried if it had bene defrauded of Spaine or any of the foresaid countreies being deuolued to the same by the foresaid Mariages so the issue of the foresaide noble women might and would haue thought them hardly and iniuriously handled yf any such case had happened Neither suche friuolous interpretations and gloses as these men nowe frame and make vpon the statute woulde then haue serued nor nowe will serue A fond imagination of the Aduersaries of the statute of 25. E. 3. But of all other their friuolous and folish ghessing vpō the clause of the statute for Infantes de Roy there is one most fond of all For they would make vs beleue
and whiche is more allmightie God doeth so charge and commaunde vs all to doe Now then who so euer repyneth against these thinges is not to be called the childe of God for he loueth not peace neither ought good men to accompanie any suche persones but rather to banishe them and all their Scholemasters as most cruell enemyes to the Citie of God For their doctrine destroyeth the foundations of the societie of mankynde aduaunceth Tyrannie Among these men there is no regarde to the safetye of Citezens nor loue to their natiue countrey no care of religion nor of true seruice obedience to God but suche an in ordinate desyre to rule and raigne they haue as will vsurpe all things take away the Lyues of honest Citizens destroye their Countrie and contemne all Religion As that fowle monstrer Caesar Borgias dyd whome a certein Atheist greatly extolleth as a most perfecte pattern for Princes to folowe But for the auoyding of these enemyes to God and man we haue a very wyse admonition of the Christian philosophor Sainct Bernard Fear not sayeth he that it is against Charitie yf by offending one thou cannest make peace for many And Tullie gyueth a good lesson for all true Princes to take hold of That Loftinesse of couraige saith he vvhiche is tryed in perills and hard aduentures if it vvant Iustice feighte not for the publick commoditie but for priuate gayne is not onlye no vertue but rather a beastlie furye raging against all humanitie VVe vvill therfore sayeth he accompt them only to be stout and valiant men vvhiche are good men freendes to trueth not deceytfull but playne dealers Of whiche opinion Edvvard king of England semed to be For in his banishement he vsed oftentymes to saye that he had rather allvvaies liue a priuate lyfe than to recouer his kingdome by the slaughter of men A verie excellent sayeing truellye and wel beseming so noble a King Let vs therfore roote out of our publick weall these disturbers of common peace that it maye more easily be conioyned and fastned in an assured amitie and agreement VVhich thing the better to obteyne we must vse the aduise and counsaile of a certein philosophor VVe affirme sayeth he that Cities are in peace and good concorde when in publique necessarie affaires they are all of one mynde take all one aduise and execute that whiche by common consent is allowed and agreed vpon As for example when it pleaseth the Citizens to appoint certeine officers or onlye Pittacus to haue the rule ouer all but when bothe couet to enioye the Gouernement as Oteocles Polynices did in Phaenicia then ariseth sedition For that ciuil concorde is in deed termed freendshipe whiche can not be reteyned but onely amōg honeste men Bycause such as are honest are at peace within them selues and with others also by reason that their willes abyde allwayes firme and steadfast not ebbyng and flowenig lyke the ryuer Euripus It happeneth otherwise among the wicked for they can not long agree together bycause in their manner of gouerning the cōmon welthe they seke all their own Priuate commoditie and bestow as litle paynes expenses charges as they can whervpon foloweth priuie grudges and seditions whiles they endomage and hurt one an other euery man neglecteth his owne dutie and so the commō state perisheth when none goeth about to protecte it Thus muche the Philosopher But touching the frendship whiche we speake of it is muche more easelye to be procured compact ratyfied among you bycause all those thinges concurre in you that are requisitie and commodions to the vnion of mennes myndes and cōsent in firme loue amitie For there is among you one stock and kynred one allyance and affinitie one language and almost one and the same course in manners cōditiōs customes lawes one and the same fauoure in countenance lyke attyre lyke behauiour in bodye and lykenesse in personage Yea all thinges else what soeuer tending to the creation and preseruation of a perpetuall peace and concorde concurre and mete together among you more fitlye than among other nations whiche in olde tyme differed muche among them selfes aswell in their natiue soile customes and lawes as in their language affinitie and alliance and yet at this daye neuerthelesse are reconciled accorded and vnited in a ciuil consent and agrement vnder the regiment of one Prince Yet some of you perchaunce will thinke it vnpossible for that people long to continue in perfect amitie whiche in so many yeres and aiges haue practized them selues one agaynst an other with fyre and swoord turning the worlde vpside down in trouble and confusion by mutuall warres spoyles mallice deadlie fede morders and all Kindes of hostilitie sithe generallie mannes nature can not suffer so great iniuries to be forgotten sithe the naturall conditions of bothe those nations seeme to be suche as either of them had rather suffer tenne thousand deathes than to be subiecte to a Prince borne in the others prouince bycause they woulde not seeme to be vnder subiection of their auncient enemye after so long contention for the Soueraigntie and so therfore the Englishe nation will by no meanes be subiect to a Scottishe Prince nor yet the Scottishe nation to an Englishe And it may be that some wicked Atheist preferring his vaine glorie ambitiō and proud haughtie mynde before the good state and safetye of a publicke weaie woulde subscribe perhapes and Yeeld to this opinion and yet is it a verye absurde opinion and contrary to all witt and reason euen as if one of your marriners in a great stormye tempest woulde saye that he had rather be drowned with the shyppe than suffer it to be gouerned by any of his mates But perhappes this felow will vrge further and aske how it can be that the Englishe Scottishe will agree together sithe the Scottish haue euer preferred their league of alliance with the frenche nation before the neyghbourhoode and frendshipp of the Englyshe For in despite of the Englishe they entred in a league of frendshipp with the Frenche seuen hundred yeres a goe and more whiche they haue kept inuiolable to this daye And in our dayes when there was great hope that the whole Yland wolde haue bene induced to the regiment of one Prince by the mariage of kynge Edward the sixt and the nowe Queene Marie of Scotland The Scottes though they had before assured her to King Edward by a common promisse deliuered her ouer neuerthelesse to the Kyng of Fraunce Therfore it was their fault not the fault of the Englishe that the amitie so muche expected betwene them was hymdred But touching that league which was made with the french it was greatlye desyred bothe by the frenche and by the Scottish as I sayd before not in despite of the Englishe but for theyr own safetye For yf they had not doone so the Scottes aswell as the other Britaines had bene driuen out of their countrye by that
farre hath Polidor Thees are woordes of great importance putte our matter clear out of doubt for here it appeareth that the case solemnlie in counceil by a wyse and prudent King with wise graue and learned Counseilours was debated and with great wisedome resolued concluded and to this some lawyers of that land gyue great authoritie credit Thus it is euidently declared who are the true heires of the Crounes of Englād Scotlād and that the sayd mariage of Iames the fowerth and the sayd Lady Margaret is to be accompted a most fortunate benefit to the whole Yland For if it be true as in dede it is that the mariage of the seuenth Kyng Henrie with the daughter and heir of King Edward the fowerth was to be estemed as a most happie cōmoditie to all England because it dyd cutt of and dissolue all those tumultes and seditions betwene the howses of Yorke and Lancaster which so many yeres had miserablie afflicted all that nation I pray you what reckening is to be made of the matrimonie betwene King Iames the fowerth of Scotlād the Ladye Margaret daughter to the King of England sithe nowe at last by the benefit of this mariage bothe England and Scotland may be quite reskewed and deliuered from those most mortall warres and intestine dissentions whiche for preheminence sake haue bene so long continewed and maintened A happie prince therfore to Englād was King Henry the seuenth for that by him allmightie God abolished all seditions and vnited the two howses of yorke and Lancastre But most fortunate most gratiouse shall the renowmed Quene Mary of Scotland be her most noble sonne king Iames also to the Englishe and Scottishe Nations yf by them two the same God shall bringe the said twoe seuerall kyngdomes to a perfect vnitie reduce the whole Yle of Britaine to his moste auncient estate of dignitie and deliuer it from all ciuill warres and Barbarous crueltie Embrace therfore ye Britaine 's of all mortall men most fortunat and take holde of this singular great benefit when the same by the grace of the euerliuing God shal be bestowed vpō yow and in the mean time euer yeeld ye to him most hūble most hartie thankes for that he of his infinite clemency and benignitie hath at last produced out of booth you bloodes a Prince by whose helpe your domesticall troubles and dissentions may be extinguished a place left for this diuine lawe of peace and amitie to be planted by the same law a soueraigne safetye and wellfare of all the people establyshed For the wellfare of the people consisteth 〈◊〉 in peace and concord But perpetuall peace and quyetnesse can not be among you except these two Realmes be combined and made all one For the force of vnitie is suche as the preseruation therof is the vtter moste ende that nature intendeth Herehence also groweth among men charitie loue frendshipp so farre that many mindes are become all as one first to remember that they must be truely menne in dede and then that they leade a good blessed lyfe whiche is the last ende and perfection of mankinde Sithe therfore the matter goeth so if you will folow God and the law of nature if you desire the safety and wellfare of your countrie yf you will liue well and fortunatlie in this world and at last enioie the perfect blesse of eternall felicitie you must enforce your selues with all labour industrie and diligence that this dispersed people may be called together vnder the regiment of one rightfull Prince and Catholique Religion of their auncestors This will please allmightie God and bring great tranquilitie peace quiet to your selues and to all the people of England Scotland and Yreland And that it maye so be lett vs all continuallie pray to almightie God the supreme gouernour ruler of the whole worlde Amen
the woord nepos A nephevv that is to say a sonnes sōne or daughters sonne though not by the propertie of the voice or speache L. Filius de S.C. Maced L. Senatus de ritu nupt L. quod si nepo tes ff test cū notatis ibid. Infantes in Frenche coūtervaileth this vvorde liberi in lat yet by interpretation admittable in all suche thinges as the lawe disposeth of And as touching this word Infants in French we say that it reacheth to other descēdantes as well as to the first degree VVherein I do referre me to suche as be expert in the saide tongue There is no worde in English for the barennes of that tongue to coūterpaise the said French word Infantes or the Latin word Liberi Therefore doe they supply it as wel as they may by this worde Children The Spaniardes also vse this worde Infantes in this ample sense when they call the nexte heire to the heire apparent Infant of Spaine euen as the late deceased Lord Charles of Austrich was called his father grandfather then liuing Yf then then the original woord of the statute declaring the said rule may naturally properly apperteine to all the Descendants why should we straine and bynde it to the first degree only otherwise than the nature of the worde or reason will beare For I suppose verely The grand fathers call their nephues sonnes L. Gallus § Instituens ff de liber Et post I. ff C. de impub. Aliis substan c. 1. q. 4. Father and son cōpted in person flesh in maner one that it wil be very harde for the Aduersarie to geue any good substantial reason why to make a diuersitie in the cases But touching the contrarie there are good and probable considerations which shall serue vs for the second cause As for that the grandfathers call their nephewes as by a more pleasant plausible name not only their children but their sonnes also for that the sonne being deceased the grandfather suruiuing not only the grādfathers affection but also such right title and interest as the sonne hath by the lawe and by proximitie of blood growe and drawe al to the nephew who representeth and supplieth the fathers place the father and the sonne beinge compted in person and in flesh in manet but as one VVhy shall then the bare and naked consideration of the external and accidental place of the birth only seuer and sunder suche an entier inwarde and natural cōiunction Adde there vnto the many great absurdities that may hereof spring and ensue Diuerse of the kinges of the Realme of Englād as well before the time of King Edwarde the third in whose time this statute was made as after him gaue their daughters out to foraine and sometimes to meane Princes in mariage Great absurditie in excluding the true right successour for the place of his birth onely VVhich they would neuer so often times haue done if they had thought that whyle they went aboute to set fotth and aduaunce their issue their doinges should haue tended to the disheriting of them from so great large and noble a Realme as that is whiche might haue chaunced if the daughter hauing a sonne or daughter had died her father liuing For there should this supposed Maxime haue ben a barre to the childrē to succede their grandfather This absurditie would haue bene more notable if it had chaunced about the time of Kinge Henry the second or this King Edward or King Henry the firste and sixte when the possessions of the Croune of that Realme were so amply enlargid in other Countries beyond the seas And yet neuer so notable as it might haue bene hereafter in our fresh memorie and remēbrance if any such thing had chaunced as by possibilitie it might haue chaunced by the late mariage of King Philippe and Queene Marie For admitting their daughter maried to a foraine Prince should haue dyed before them she leauing a sonne furuiuing his father and grandmother they hauing none other issue so nigh in degree then would this late framed Maxime haue excluded the same sonne lamentably and vnnaturally from the succession of the Croune of Englande and also the same Croune from the inheritance of the Realmes of Spain of both Sicilies with their appurtenances of the Dukedom of Milan and other landes and Dominions in Lumbardy and Italie as also from the Dukedomes of Brabant Luxemburg Geldres Zutphan Burgundie Friseland from the Countreies of Flādres Artois Holland Zealand Namurs and from the new found lands parcel of the said kingdome of Spaine VVhich are vnlesse I be deceiued more ample by dubble or treble than all the Countreies now rehearsed Al the whiche Countreies by the foresaid Mariage should haue bene by al right deuolued to the said sonne if any such child had bene borne If either the same by the force of this iolie new found Maxime had bene excluded from the Croune of England or the saide Croune from the inheritance of the foresaid Countreies were there any reason to be yelded for the maintenance of this supposed rule or Maxime in that case Or might there possibly rise any commodity to the Realme by obseruinge there in this rigourous pretensed rule that should by one hundred part counteruaile this importable losse and spoile of the Croune and of the lawfull inheritour of the same But perchāce for the auoiding of this exceptiō limited vnto the blood roial some wil say An euasion auoided pretending the priuilege of the Kīgs children not to be in respect of the Croune but of other lādes that the same was but a priuilege graunted to the kinges children not in respect of the succession of the Croune but of other landes descending to them from their Auncestours VVhiche although we might very well admit allowe yet can it not be denied but that the same priuilege was graunted vnto the Kinges children and other descendantes of the Blood royall by reason of the dignitie and worthines of the Croune whiche the King their father did enioy and the great reuerence whiche the lawe geueth of dewtie therevnto And therefore if the aduersaries would go about to restraine withdraw from the Croune that priuilege which the law geueth to the kings childrē for the Crounes sake they should doo therein contarie to al reason against the rules of the Arte of Reasoning which saith that Propter quod vnumquodque illud magis Beside that I would faine knowe by what reason might a man saye that they of the Kinges Blood born out of the allegeance of England may inherite landes within that Realme as heires vnto theyr Ancestours and yet not to be able to inherite the Croune Truly in mine opiniō it were against all reason But on the contrarie side the very force of reason muste driue vs to graunt the like The royall blood beareth his honour vvith it vvhereso euer it be Yea more great and ample priuilege and benefit of the lawe
in the succession of the Croune For the Roial blood where so euer it be found will be taken as a pretious and singular Iewell and will carie with it his worthie estimation honour with the people and where it is dew his right withall Vide Anto CorsetuÌ„ de potest et excell regi q. 100. By the Ciuill lawe the right of the inheritance of priuate persones is hemmed and inched within the bandes of the tenth degre The Blood Roial runneth a farther race so farre as it may be found therfore the great mightie Conquerors are glad faine to ioyne in affinitie with the blood Roial OoÌ„querors glad to ioine vvith the royall blood Henry the first euer fearing the weaknes of their owne bloddie sworde in respect of the greate force and strength of the other For this cause was Henrie the firste called for his learning wisedome Beauclerke glad to consociate and couple him selfe with the auncient Roial blood of the Saxons whiche continueing in the Princely succession from worthie king Alured was cutte of by the death of the good king Edward and by the mariyng of Mathildis being in the fourth degree in lineal descent to the said king Edward was reuiued and reunited From this Edward my sayd souueraine ladie the Queene of Scotland taketh her noble auncient Pedegrue These then and diuers other reasons causes mo may be alleaged for the weighing setting foorth of the true meaning and intent of the said law Now in case these two causes and consideratioÌ„s will not satisfie the aduersaries we wil adioine there vnto an other whiche they shall neuer by any good and honest shift auoid And that is the vse and practise of the Realme as wel in the time foregoing the said statute as afterward VVe stand vpon the interpretation of the common law recited and declared by the said statute L. fin ff de legibus how shal we better vnderstand what the law is therein then by the vse and practise of the said lawe For the best interpretation of the law is custome Common vse and practise the best interpretation of the lavve EodeÌ„ anno Rex cuÌ„ in diebus suis processisset AeldreduÌ„ VigornenseÌ„ EpiscopuÌ„ ad RegeÌ„ Hungariae transmittens reuocauit inde filium fratris sui Edmundi Eduardum cuÌ„ tota familia sua vt vel ipse ver filii eiê° sibi succederent in regnum Flor. histo 1057. But the Realme before the statute admitted to the Croune not only kings children and others of the first degre but also of a farther degre and suche as were plainely borne out of the kinges allegeance The foresaid vse and practise appeareth as wel before as sithens the time of the Conquest Among other king Eduard the Confessour being destitute of a lawful Heire whithin the Realme sent into Hungary for Edward his Nephew surnamed Out law son to king EdmuÌ„d called Ironside after many yeres of his exile to returne into England to the intent the said Outlaw should inherite that Realme whiche neuerthelesse came not to effect by reason the said outlaw died before the sayd king Edward his Vncle. After whose death the said king appointed Eadgar Adeling sonne of the said Outlaw being his next cosen to be his heire as he was of right to the Croune of England And for that the said Eadgar was but of yong and tender yeres and not able to take vpon him so great a gouernement the said king committed the protection as wel of the yong Prince as also of the Realm to Harold Earle of Kent vntil suche time as the said Eadgar had obteined perfit age to be hable to welde the state of a king Flor. bislo 1066. Aelredus Regional leÌ„f de reg AngloruÌ„ ad Regem Henr. â— VVhich Harold neuerthelesse contrary to the trust supplanted the said yong Prince of the kingdome and put the Croune vpon his owne head By this it is apparent that foraine birth was not accoÌ„pted before the time of the Conquest to be a iust cause to repel and reiect any man beinge of the next proximitie in blood from the Title of the Croune And though the said king Edward the Confessors will and purpose tooke no suche force and effect King Stephen and King H. 2. as he desired and the lawe craued yet the like succession tooke place effectuouslye in king Stephen and king Henry the second as we haue already declared Neither will the Aduersaries shift of forainers borne of father and mother which be not of the kings allegeance The aduersaries fond imagination that H. 2. should come to the Croune by compositioÌ„ not by proximitie of blood Rex Stephanus omni haerede viduatus praeter soluÌ„ modo DuceÌ„ Henricum recognouit in conueÌ„tu EpiscoporuÌ„ aliorum de regno Optimatum quod Dux Henr. ius haereditariuÌ„ iÌ„ regnuÌ„ Angliae habebat Et Dux benigne concessit vt Rex Stephanê° tota vita sua suuÌ„ RegnuÌ„ pacifice possideret Ita tamen confirmatuÌ„ est pactuÌ„ quod ipse Rex ipsi tunc praesentes cuÌ„ caeteris regni optimatibê° iurareÌ„t quod Dux Henr. post morteÌ„ Regis si illum superâ—iueret regnum sine aliqua coÌ„ntradictione obtineret Flor. histo An. 1153 The like fond imagination touching King Richardes nephevv Diuersitie of opinions touching the vncle nephue vvhetherof them ought to be preferred in the royall gouuernement help them forasmuche as this clause of the said statute is not to be applied to the kings children but to others as appeareth in the same statute And these two kings Stephen and Henrie the .2 as they were borne in a forain place so their fathers and mothers were not of the kings allegeance but mere Aliens and strangers And how notorious a vaine thing it is that the Aduersaries would perswade vs that the said King Henrie the second rather came in by force of a composition then by the proximitie and nearenes of blood I leaue it to euery man to consider that hath any maner of feling in the discours of the stories of that realm The composition did procure him quietnes and rest for the time with a good and sure hope of quiet and peaceable entrance also after the death of King Stephen and so it followed in deede but ther grew to him nomore right thereby than was due to him before For he was the true heir to the Croune as appeareth by Stephen his Aduersaries owne confession Henry the firste maried his daughter Mathildis to Henry the Emperour by whome he had no children And no dout in case she had had any children by the Emperour they should haue ben heires by successioÌ„ to the Croune of England After whose death she retourned to her father yet did king Henry cause all the Nobilitie by an expresse othe to embrace her after his death as Queene and afrer her her children Not long after she was maried to Ieffrey Plantagenet a Frenchman borne Earle of Aniowe who begat
exclude the said Queene of Scotland being called to the Croune by the Title of generall heritage then is the municipial law of France likewise good and effectual consequeÌ„tly the kings of England haue made all this while an vniust wrongfull clame to the Croune of FraÌ„ce But now to go somewhat further in the matter or rather to come neerer home and to touche the quicke we say as there was some apparent good cause why the king should the twentie and eight yeare of his reigne thinke vpon some limitation appointement of the Croune king Edward as yet vnborne so after he was borne and that the Title and interest of the reuersion of the Croune after him was the thirtie and fifte yeare by Parlament confirmed to the late Queene Marie and her sister Queene Elizabeth it is not to be thought that he would afterward ieoparde so great a matter by a Testament and will whiche may easely be altered and counterfeyted and least of all make suche assignation of the Croune as is nowe pretended For being a Prince of such wisdome and experience he could not be ignorant that this was the next and rediest way to put the state at least of both his daughters to great peril and vtter disherison This supposed vvill geueth occasion of ambitious aspiring For the Kinges example and boldnes in interrupting and cutting away so many branches of the neerest side and line might soone breede in aspiring and ambitious hartes a bolde and wicked attempte the way being so farre brought in and prepared to their handes by the Kinge him selfe and their natures so readie and prone to follow euil presidents and to clime high by some colourable meanes or other to spoile and depriue the said daughters of their right of the Croune that should descend and fal vpon them and to conuey the same to the heires of the said Ladie Francis And did not I pray you this drift and deuise fall out euen so tending to the vtter exclusion of the late Queene Marie and her Sister Queene Elizabeth if God had not repressed and ouerthrowen the same These reasones then presumptions may seme wel able and sufficient to beare doune to breake doune and ouerthrow the weake and slender presumptions of the Aduersaries grounded vpon vncertaine and mere surmises ghesses and coÌ„iectures as among other that the king was offended with the Queene of Scotland and with the Ladie Leneux VVhich is not true And as for the Ladie Leneux it hath no maÌ„ner of probabilitie as it hath not in dede in the said Queene And if it had yet it is as probable and much more probable that the king would haue especially at that time for suche cause as we haue declared suppressed the same displeasure Graunting now that there were some such displeasure was it honorable either for the King or the Realme or was it thinke ye euer thought by the Parlament that the king should disherite them for euery light displeasure And if as the Aduersaries confesse the king had no cause to be offeÌ„ded with the Frenche Queenes children why did he disherite the Ladie Francis and the Ladie Eleonor also Their other presumption which they ground vpon the auoyding of the vncertenty of the succession by reason of his will is of smal force and rather turneth against them For it is so farre of that by this meanes the succession is made more certaine and sure as contrarywise it is subiecte to more vncerteintie and to lesse suertie than before Succession to the Croune more vncerten by the supposed vvill than before For whereas before the right and clame to the Croune hong vpon an ordinarie and certaine course of the common lawe vpon the certaine and assured right of the royall and vnspotted blood yea vpon the very lawe of nature whereby many inconueniences manie troubles daungers and seditions are in al Countries politikely auoyded so now depending vpon the statute onely it is as easie by an other statute to be infringed and ouerthrowen and depending vpon a Testament it is subiect to many corruptions sinister dealinges cauillations yea and iust ouerthrowes by the dishabilitie of the Testatours witnesses or the Legatorie himselfe or for lacke of dewe order to be obserued or by the death of the witnesses vnexamined for many other like coÌ„sideratioÌ„s The Monuments of all antiquitie Much forgerie and counterfeyting of TestameÌ„ts the memorie of al ages of our owne age dayly experience can tel and shewe vs many lamentable examples of many a good lawfull TestameÌ„t by vndue and craftie meanes by false suborned witnesses by the couetous bearing and maintenance of such as be in authoritie quite vndone and ouerthrowne VVherefore Valerius Maximus crieth out against M. Crassus Valerius Maximus dict et fa. lib. 9. 6. 4. and Q Horiensius Lumina Curiae ornamenta Fori quod â—celus vindicare debebant inhonesti lucri captura inuitati authoritatibus suis texerunt This presuÌ„ption then of the Aduersaries rather maketh for vs and ministreth to vs good occasion to thinke that the king would not hasard the weight and importance of such a matter to reste vpon the validitie or inualiditie of a bare Testament only By this that we haue said we may probably gather that the King had no cause to aduenture so great an interprise by a bare will and Testament Ye shall nowe heare also why we thinke he did neuer attempt or enterprise any such thing It is well knowen the King was not wonte lightly to ouerslippe the occasion of any great commoditie presently offered And yet this notwithstanding hauing geuen to him by Acte of Parlament the ordering and disposition of all Chantries and Colleges he did neuer or very litle practise and execute this authoritie And shall we thinke vnlesse full and sufficient proofe necessarily enforce creditte that the King to his no present commoditie and aduantage but yet to his greate dishonour and to the greate obloquie of his subiectes and other Countries to the notable disherison of so may the next royall blood did vse any such authoritie as is surmised Againe if he had made any suche assignation who doubteth but that as he coÌ„ditioned in the said pretensed will with his noble daughters In this supposed vvill is no condition for the mariage of the heires of the L. Francis as is for the Kinges ovvne daughters to marie with his Counsels aduise either els not to enioy the benefitte of the succession he would haue tyed the said Ladie Francis and Ladie Eleonours heirs to the same condition Further more I am driuen to thinke that there passed no such limitation by the said king Henries will by reason there is not nor was these many yeares any original copy therof nor any authentical Record in the ChaÌ„cerie or els where to be shewed in all England as the Aduersaries them selues confesse And in the copies that be spread abrode the witnesses pretended to be preseÌ„t at the signing