Selected quad for the lemma: law_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
law_n	conclude_v	justify_v	work_n	5,025	5	6.3708	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
B00819	Five godlie sermons, preached by R.T. Bachiler of diuinitie. 1. The charge of the cleargie. 2. The crowne of Christians. 3. The annointment of Christ, or Christian ointment. 4. A festiuall sermon vpon the Natiuitie of Christ. 5. The fruits of hypocrisie..; Five godlie and learned sermons	Tyrer, Ralph, d. 1627.	1602 (1602)	STC 24475.5; ESTC S106205	127,399	317

fables as shadowes of some other truth as that these mortall creatures supposed Gods and Idolles of the Gentles were in a manner conuerted into such brute beasts by their vncleane actions Againe we finde in the holy scriptures that Satan transformed him selfe in to an Angell of light 2. Cor. 11.13 that the true Angels of God haue oftentimes takē vnto them the shapes forms of men in which they haue appeared when they haue beene sente from Heauen downe into the earth and whereby they haue not only spoken vnto men but also eaten and druncken with men Yea we shall reade in the ould Testament and new in manie places that the Lord God himselfe appeareth vnto his saints and seruants in diuers semblances and fashions but especially in the forme of fire As when he appeared vnto Moises in the flame of a firie bush Exo. 3. Vnto the Children of Israell when he led them throughe the wildernesse in a Pillour of fire Exod. 13. and vnto the disciples and Apostles when the Holy Ghost descended in the shape of fire clouen tounges whervpon Austin vseth these words Hoc enim ele mentum est magnum sacramentum De Symb ad Catech lib. 3. cap. 9. As also the Lord some times to haue shewed himselfe in other formes as God the Father in the shape of a man when he came to Abraham sitting at the Oake of Mamre Gen. 18. And God the Holy ghost in the forme of a Doue when he appeared to Iohn Baptist after Christs baptisme Math. 3. But none of these before mentioned did keepe those shapes and sēblances which they tooke or seemed to take vpon them but forsooke them immediately after they had perfourmed what they would by that meanes But our Sauiour Christ Iesus whē he was thus manifested in our flesh he tooke it not vpō him for a time but perpetually euen to be our eternall mediatour both God and man world without end and to continewe a preist for euer after the order of Melchesidecke And here we are to note how properly the Apostle writeth when he here setteth downe that God was manifested in the fleash and not the Godhead speaking as the logitians say in the contract but not in the Abstract being true in the one as appeareth but not in the other as in the Contract because it containeth in it the whole person of Christ consisting of both natures but not in the Abstract for that it considereth the seuerall nature of his diuinitie only which in noe wise can be manifested in the fleash nor be confounded with his humanitie vnlesse we will runne into Eutiches errour and thinke that his manhood was not taken only but also absorpt and consūpt of his Godhead which is a foule Heresie so that it appeareth euidently what maner of manifestation this was Now therefore only in a word or two lette vs speake of the forme it selfe into which god is here said to be manifested so to passe on to the nexte branche of this misterie because we haue dwelt verie lōg in this alreadie which forme is here said to be in the fleash that is in humaine nature As that which was immortall inuisible incomprehensible and infinite should take vnto it a kind of nature which was mortal uisible comprehensible and finite yea which might be seene touched and handled and like vnto vs in all respects sinne only excepted not by conuerting the Godhead in to manhood but by conioyning the humaine nature to the diuine vniting them both in one person of Christ our mediatour euen as Iohn 1.1 witnesseth that which we haue hard that which we haue seen which we haue looked vpon our hands haue handled of the word of life neither tooke he any other fourme either of any Creature vpon the earth or of any power in heauē noe not of any Angell but of the seede of Abraham onely Heb. 2.16 And why because as the Apostle in the same chapter rendreth the Reason for as much as the children were partakers of flesh bloud he also himselfe tooke likewise parte with them Vers 14 Here then flesh is not taken for the naturall vitiousnesse of mans corruption as it is often times taken in the scriptures especially in the Epistle to the Romanes for the vnregenerate parte of man contrarie vnto the spirit for then should our Sauiour Christ be subiect vnto sinne as we are which were blasphemie to affirme but for the whole naturall and true essence and substance of a mortal man both of reasonable soule and of humaine fleash subsisting and not of body only least we fall into the Erronious opinion of the Apollinarists And thus much of this maine branche of this greate misterie now of the nexte Iustified in the spirite As this is an annexiō vnto the words going before so is it an amplification of the former misterie as if the Apostle Paule had said although Christ the sonne of God and God himselfe was manifested in the fleash as he hath set downe more at large Phil. 2. Yet did th● 〈◊〉 most glorious shine and signe of diuine power and Godhead manifestly appeare and shew fourth it selfe which here is called spirit as the same is expressed more plainely First by our Apostle Romans 1.4 when he saieth that he was declared mightily to be the son of god touching the spirit of sanctification by the resurrection from the deade as being one notable and notorious action of his supernaturall vertue Secondly by Peter 1.3.18 by an other semblable acte euen the worthy worke of his passion As that he was put to death according to the fleash but was quickned in the spirit And thirdly Iohn 1.14 that the word became fleash and dwelt amongest vs and we sawe the glorie thereof as the glorie of the only begotten sonne of the father full of grace and truth So that to iustifie in this place is not to make or pronounce one Righteous or iust which is not so indeede as this word is taken Luke 16.15 in those words of our Sauiour vnto the Pharisies Ye are they which Iustifie your selues before men but God knoweth your harts c. And Luke 18.14 in that conclusion of the parable and difinitiue sentence of our sauiour between the Pharisie and the publican whē he saith that the one departed ●ō rather Iustified thē the other And finally as it is taken so often in the Epistle to the Romans where our Apostle handleth that cheife pointe of our Religion euen our Iustification but especially Chap. 3.28 In those words Therfore we cōclude that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the lawe But this word here signifieth to approue shewe forth or declare a man to be such an one by certaine signes and sure tokens by infallible Arguments and euident demonstrations such as cannot be refelled or refuted As Psal 51. in those words of the Prophet Dauid Against thee alone O Lord haue I sinned and done this euill in thy sight that thou mightest be iustified