worke done so doth not the Hypocrite he looks to the act onely being carelesse of affection The one doth rather desire to be then to seeme to be the Hypocrite is quite contrary The one cleaueth to the Lord with purpose of heart the other is wauering and vnstable The one is led to good or to shun euill with regard of fauour or feare the other that hee may please God The one complaineth of his infirmity rather then hee will praise his good deedes the other delighteth to heare of his owne good doings The one saith little doth much the other doeth little and talketh much The one doeth cloake bad actions with good pretences so will not the other Tim. What further obseruations and instructions from this Text Silas First vpon this text is grounded the distinction of the inward and outward Sacrament Also of the visible and inuisible Church Secondly that as euerie Sacrament hath a Signe and a thing signified so these two are euer ioyned in the right vse of the Sacrament the one taken outwardly by the sense the other inwardly receiued by the spirit Lastly that grace is not tied vnto the Sacrament which some haue without grace and the benefites promised the thing of the Sacrament is separate from the signe vnto all beleeuers CHAP. III. DIALOGVE I. Verse 1 2. 1. What is the preferment of the Iew or what is the profit of Circumcision 2. Much euery way because vnto them of trust was committed the Oracles of God Timotheus IN few wordes lay downe the sum and order of this third Chapter Sil. The Apostle stil goeth on to proue the Iewes to be guilty thorough sinne of Gods wrath that whatsoeuer prerogatiues they had on Gods part to grace them yet because of their vnbeliefe and other transgressions they were no more iust before God then the sinfull Gentiles as he confirmeth by sundry authorities diuine out of the Prophets and Psalmes whereuppon hee inferreth that by the workes of the Law none be iustified in the sight of God and so at last concludeth demonstratiuely the maine and principall proposition of this Epistle that all elect sinners bee they Iewes or Gentiles are iustified without the workes of the Law by the faith of Christ. Touching the generall parts of this Chapter they bee these three First is a confutation of diuers cauils and calumnious Obiections which the Iewes might mooue on their owne behalfe out of such thinges as Paul had written vntill verse 9. The second from the 9. Verse vnto the 21. wherein he both propoundeth proueth the quality both of Iew and Gentiles in the case of sin and damnation In the third and last part he inferreth and by vnanswerable reasons demonstrateth this affirmatiue proposition All men bee iustified by faith from verse 21. till the end of the Chapter Tim. What is the drift of this present Text Silas To bring the Iewes the better to the sight of their owne sins and wretchednesse by answering such things as they obiected for their owne defence For it might trouble them which the Apostle wisely foresaw to heare Paul so extenuate Circumcision and other priuiledges Tim. What is the first Obiection and how doth the Apostle answere it Sil. The Obiection is this If notwithstanding Circumcision yet the Iew and Gentile be alike sinners and miserable wherein then is the preferment of the Iew in what doth he excell the Gentile For it were absurd and iniurious vnto God himselfe to equall the Gentile vnto the Iew. To which the Apostle so answeareth as leauing them equall for guilt of sinne yet he giueth to the Iew his prerogatiue Tim. What be the parts of this Text Sil. Two First a question in the first verse Secondly an answer in the second verse Tim. What learned we out of the Question Silas Three things First how hard a thing it is to bring men to yeelde to their owne conuiction and condemnation Secondly that men naturally do affect excellencie to bee thought better then others Thirdlie that such Ceremonies as men are accustomed to they cannot abide to haue them reproued And adde this as a fourth That Preachers must wisely preuent and remoue what may be scrupulous to the weake or occasion of slander vnto the malicious persons Tim. What did we learne of the answere Silas The Wisedome of the Apostle who in reporting the preferment of the Iewes doth not onely stand vpon the vertues of the Iewes but-onely reckons such things as were meete and belonged to God being his benefits least they should be proud For he doth point at many things in that hee saith Much euery way yet mentioned onely the Oracles of God as the chiefest of his sauours which is signified by the word First noting not an order but the dignitie of this priuiledge as generall containing the rest and most excellent surpassing the rest Tim. Whence did he setch this word Oracles Silas From the Gentiles who vse to cal the answers which were giuen by Apollo at Delphos by the name of Oracle Tim. What did this teach Sil. That wee should not put Religion in wordes when wee may vse them without any wrong vnto the truth Tim. What is meant heere by the Oracles of God Silas All the Scriptures of the Old Testament both Moysaicall and Propheticall but especially the free promises of grace and saluation by Christ. These Oracles were committed to the Iewes not as another mans thing laide to pledge but as their owne treasure to be enioyed for their vse to instruct and comfort them if they could haue vsed it well Howbeit thorough their owne fault they serued not to this end and so they lost the right of this prerogatiue so as it nothing profited them Tim. What instructions were giuen from hence Sil. Three that to haue the word of God amongst vs is the greatest priuiledge and sauour that God giueth to any people because hereby Gods counsell for our saluation is reuealed and men are called to the kingdome of heauen and to other fauours concerning the life to come therefore we ought to esteeme and loue the worde aboue all other things because God will not let the contempt of such a precious treasure goe without reuenge Secondly wee learne that it is a signe that God maketh high account of that people to whome hee doth of trust commit his worde which should woorke in vs great care of thankfulnesse to God with study and an earnest desire of pleasing him Thirdly wee learne that the office of the Church toward the word is to be a keeper of it for it is of trust committed to vs as a iewell to be kept the duty of the Church herein doeth consist in foure particulars First to interprete and giue the true sence of the worde Secondly to seuer it from all false and bastard Scriptures Thirdly to propound foundly the doctrine of the worde to the Children of the Church Fourthly to preserue the doctrine vncorrupt and to punish such as depraue it and herein the
matter of reioycing because then wee were acceptable to God for some thing which is in our selues and done by our selues whereas faith carieth vs out of our selues vnto Christ for righteousnesse Tim. But yes good workes are done by Gods grace therefore glory belon geth to them and wee may reioyce therein as fruits of his grace Sil. Yet it is we which doe these workes by our vnderstanding and willes renued but some will say haply it is also wee which beleeue Howbeit our faith it is no more but the hand to receiue Christ and his righteousnes to bee thereby accounted righteous in Gods sight Tim. Yet some reioycing is left in that Christs righteousnes is not our's vnlesse we take it by faith Sil. No more then a poore Leper for that hee hath reached out a leprous haÌ„d to take a kings gift bestowed vpon him to enrich himselfe thereby for notwithstanding his reaching out his hand yet hee shoulde remaine poore if no guift were giuen and that shewes that not the taking but the thing giuen euen Christ is our iustice which yet must be taken hold off that it may be ours But all the vertue of faith whereby it iustifieth is not in it selfe but commeth from the obiect Christ who is laide holde on which tendeth much to humble all flesh before God that wee glory in none but Christ. DIAL XVII Verses 28. 29. Therefore we conclude that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the law God is he the God of the Iewes onely and not of the Gentiles also yea euen of the Gentiles also Tim. VVHat is the summe and drift of this text Sil. It is a conclusion of the former dispute touching iustification by faith and hath three new reasons to proue the same First iustification is by faith because by that way God is most glorified Secondly if we were iustified by works of the law it might be thought that God were God of the Iewes only but the Gentiles which beleeued and had not the lawe of Moses haue God for their God therefore it is by faith Lastly iustification by faith doth much ratifie and greatly confirme the law therefore it is by faith that wee are iustified Tim. Whence is the first reason fetched Sil. From the word therefore which hath reference to that which was said before as if he should say seeing God declareth his righteousnes by our iustification by faith and thereby al matter of reioycing and glorying is taken from vs that it may be in God aloneê in these regards wee conclude inferre and gather that righteousnes is by faith Tim. What meaneth this word conclude Sil. It importeth the certaine and infallible trueth of that which is here inferred because the word signifieth the casting vppe of many summes into one as of two tens 〈◊〉 together is made twenty so certaine is this truth as there is no doubt to be made of it Tim. Wherefore serueth this Sil. First to stay the conscience vpon this truth of righteousnes by faith being so firme Secondly to teach that in matters of religion things ought to be proued by firme demoÌ„stration or vngain sayable arguments which may euidently proue the thing in question and strongly euict the conscience Tim. What meaneth he by man Sil. Euen euery Christian of what sexe age or country whatsoeuer Tim. What meaneth he to say that Iustification is by fayth without workes Sil. That is to say the man that beleeueth is thereby absolued from his sinnes without any respect of fulfilling the law by workes or without all merite by workes from whence is inferred that faith onely iustifieth Tim. Will not this open a gap to licenciousnes and neglect of good workes Sil. No surely because they are necessary to saluation as a way that leadeth thither though not to Iustification which goeth before workes as a cause of them Tim. Faith it selfe is a worke of the spirit therefore if we be iustified by faith we are iustified by a worke Sil. It doth not iustifie vs as a woorke for so it is vnperfect and needeth pardon but as it goeth out of vs and laieth hold on Christ in whome is all perfection or it iustifieth as a woork ordained of GOD to bee the organicall meanes to receiue Christ. Tim. What learne wee from hence that God is the God of the Gentiles Sil. That there were some Gentiles which were ioyned to Gods people and had their sinnes forgiuen them euen before the generall calling of the Gentiles after the comming of Christ. Examples hereof we haue in Iob and also his frends and Iethro Cornelius the Syrophenitian woman for examples Tim. What is it to haue God to be our God Sil. To make a league with vs to bestow all manner of happines vpon vs for Christ so we beleeue Tim. What are the particular benefits which they haue who haue God for their God Sil. First vnion with Christ. Secondly adoption to be the sonnes of God Thirdly imputation of 〈◊〉 with forgiuenesse of all sinnes Fourthly the spirit of sanctification together with peace of conscience ioy in the spirit hope of glory accesse vnto Gods fauour Fiftly all Creatures are our seruants 〈◊〉 the very Angels Heb. 1. 14. Sixtly all Creatures are at league with vs. Hose 2. 18. Seauenthly afflictions yea sins turne to our good through Gods great loue Eightly his blessings are as pledges of his fauour Ninthly the Scriptures are written for vs and belong onely and wholy to vs which are in league with God through Christ. Tim. What was gathered hereof Sil. That it is a wonderfull mercy to bee one of Gods people blessed are they whose God is Iehouah Psal. 144. there is more matter of thanksgiuing ioy in this then in hauing a world of riohes in being the sonnes of Kings and Princes DIAL XVIII Verse 30 31. For it is one God which shall iustifie Circumcision of faith and vncircumcision through Faith 31. Do we make the Law c. Tim. WHat is the meaning of this verse Silas By circumcision is meant the Iew and by vncircumcision the Gentile A Metonimie of the adioynt for the subiect Tim. What then is it to iustifie Circumcision of Faith Silas First a Iew is not iustified because he is such a one that is one circumcised according to the Law but because he beleeueth in Christ. Tim. What vnderstand ye by iustifying vncircumcision by Faith Silas That a Gentile is not cast off because he is such that is vncircumcised but hauing faith to beleeue in Christ God iustifieth him also Tim. What followes of this Silas That Iew and Gentile which beleeue haue one God a common God and Sauiour to them both For God is God and Sauiour to euerie one whom hee Iustifyeth Tim. How doth the Apostle from hence conclude his mayne argument of Iustification by faith without workes Tim. Namely thus that seeing the Iew which had the Law of Moses had God his God to iustifie him not for the works of the Law which
the constitution of body in equall tenour during the handling of this Epistle the Reader therefore may not looke for equal exactnesse of stile and stuffe in euery part of this Booke 5. I had a care to accommodate my selfe as for manner so for matter to my Auditory in that regard haue pressed some points further then some other and passed by or lightly passed ouer more pertinent to the text to driue home some others more fitting to the times and persons where and with whom I do liue Howbeit this thou shalt finde vniuer sally thorow the whole Booke that both the naturall sence of words and phrases and the Analysis or artificiall disposition of the Text with Summe Scope and Coherence of euery Sentence is constantly and faithfully I trust deliuered But for as much as there was an Ocean of hard and dark some both things to be entreated and Texts to be interpreted wherein I mette with great diuersity of Opinions among Expositors so as it was difficult if not imposible for such an one as I am to hit the marke in euery passage of this Epistle therefore in my best humblenesse and reuerence I submit my Spirit vnto the Prophets being not onely desirous but beseeching the Learned Teachers and guides of our English Church in loue to shew me my faylings whereof I feare they shal find not a few not slight ones Concluding with the Poet Si quid nouisti rectius istis Candidus imperti si non his vtere mecum What righter things thou knowst impart Or what I bring thee take in good part Thine in the Lord Tho. Wilson THE EPISTLE OF the Apostle PAVLE to the Romanes Explained and Opened Familiarly in Forme of a Dialogue betweene TIMOTHEVS and SILAS Wherein ye haue for the most part 7. thinges performed on euerie Text. 1. The Scope 2. Summe 3. Method 4. Interpretation with their 5. Doctrines 6. Reasons 7. And Vses of euerie Text. DIAL I. Timotheus WHat was the chiefe Argument and Occasion of Writing this Epistle Silas A Difference and dissention betweene the Iewes Gentiles which was abused by the malice of Satan and was likely to haue much hindered the course of the Gospell yea to haue stifled and choakt it in the verie Cradle and beginnings For the Iewes which did beleeue did thinke thorough the suggestion of some false Apostles Acts 15. that the Legall Ceremonies were to be still obserued as necessary to Saluation that vnlesse men were circumcised and kept the Law they could not be iustified and saued by Christ. Whereas the beleeuing Gentiles did knowe by the Doctrine of the Gospell their exemption from Moyses Law being taught that in the death and passion of our Lord all Legall rites were fully determined and that Faith alone in Christ was sufficient to Iustification before God Heereuppon arose no small discorde betweene Iewes and Gentiles which were mixed together the Iewes bearing themselues insolently because of their priuiledges despised the Gentiles as enemies of Moyses Law and the Gentiles insulting ouer the Iewes as reiected of God for the contempt of Christ. To compound this dissention Paul the Apostle framed this Epistle First shewing that neyther Gentiles by their naturall Woorkes or Iewes by their Legall deeds could be Iustified for somuch as the one violated and brake the Law of nature and the other the Lawe of Moyses therefore both the one and the other were to be Iustified thorough Christ alone apprehended by a true and liuely Faith After this generall Doctrine reaching vnto the ninth Chapter there he doth in more perticular sort represse both the insolency of the Iews by prouing that the promises were giuen and became effectuall onely to the true Israel euen to such as were of the faith of Abraham to all the Elect of God which beleeue in Christ and not to the carnall seede which came of Abraham onely according to the flesh Then in the 11. Chapter conuerting him to the Gentiles he perswadeth them vnto humility that they should modestly behaue themselues toward the Iewes forsomuch as diuers of them were dayly called to the Faith and towardes the second comming of Christ God would graffe in againe the whole Nation and make them the Members of the Christian Church When the fulnesse or bodie of the Gentiles should enter into the same then the blindnesse of the Iewes should cease it being neyther totall nor final but only in part and for a time In the 14. Chapter againe Paul setteth vppon Iewes and Gentiles exhorting them both with many and waighty reasons vnto Brotherly loue and peace not to be diuided one from another or to iudge and contemne one another about Dayes and Meats and such things as were of a middle nature The rest of the Epistle is spent in exhortations to Morrall Good-workes both speciall in respect of a Calling and generall belonging to all Christians Chap. 12. and part of the 13. where politicall duties be vrged both of the Maiestrate and of the Subiect Finally after diuers salutations and familiar matters he doth verie grauely conclude the Epistle with admonition to take heede of false Teachers with giuing of Thankes and praises of God Tim. What is the scope of this Epistle Silas To teach the way of obtaining true Righteousnesse which is not by works but by a liuely faith in Christ Iesus Tim. Are there any more matters handled in this Epistle Silas Yea sundry and most waighty as namelie about Originall Corruption Sanctification Spirituall Combate the vse of the Law of the remnants of sinne the benefites of afflictions the Constancie of Beleeuers Election Reprobation Reiection Prouocation of the Iewes Morrall Ecclesiasticall and Politicall duties Christian Liberty familiar matters Tim. What Reasons may mooue vs to loue and Studie this Epistle Sil. 1. The worthinesse and variety of the Matter 2. the Method and order of writing being verie exacte 3. the Dignity of the Instrument or Pen-man being an Apostle that had seene visions and Reuclations 4. the Maiesty and Wisedom of the Author being the God of Wisedome and Maiesty Tim. Into what Parts may this Epistle be diuided Into two parts 1. the Title and Inscription The Epistle c. 2. the Treatise Paul an Apostle c. The Treatise hath a preface ad Verse 16. wherein Paul Saluteth the Romaines wishing them good thinges and describeth the person of Christ also testifieth his pur pose of visiting them after the Preface is a Doctrionall institution vnto Chap. 12. and another exhortatorie vnto the end of the Epistle Tim. What Significations be there of this worde Epistle Sil. It hath two the one vnproper and borrowed the other proper and naturall by the vnproper signification signifieth any thing that representeth the minde of another Thus the Scriptures bee Gods Epistles also the Corinthians are called Pauls Epistles because their conuersion by his preaching as an Epistle of recommendation did commend him for a true Minister of Christ 2. Cor. 3 2. Secondly in a proper signification it
other things 〈◊〉 we heere in this Text Silas That naturally we are ignorant of the gospell because we cannot knowe it without reuelation from heauen We are not borne beleeuers Tim. Tell vs now what Faith is that which is the Iustifying Faith and whereunto the Righteousnes reuealed in the Gospell is imputed and applied Sil. Not that Historicall Faith which is but a bare knowledge nor the Miraculous Faith by which wonders are done nor the Temporary Faith of Hypocrites which vanisheth in time of affliction Math. 13. but that Faith which hath application of the thinges beleeued ioyned with the true knowledge and assuraunce of vnderstanding whence commeth confidence and boldnesse Tim. How many things are comprehended in this Faith Silas Fiue things First apprehension in laying hold on Christ. Secondly approbation in esteeming Christ aboue all or more then all Thirdly expetition in desiring him before all Fourthly Oblectation delighting in him more then all Lastly Expectation looking for the full inioying of his presence and glory Tim. What meaneth he to say From Faith to Faith Sil. Not from one Faith to another but from one degree of Faith to another from weaker faith to stronger from a lesser Faith to a greater Whereas this phrase From Faith to Faith by diuerse Interpreters is diuersly expounded as from an vnformed Faith to a formed which is Popish from the Faith of the Preacher to the Faith of the hearer Thus Augustine but amisse for a mans owne faith iustifieth therefore from faith of Parents to faith of posterity is amisse also from the faith of the old Testament to the faith of the new as Chrysostom thought not wel nor fitly from the Faith of one Article to the Faith of another as Anselme writeth from the faith of things present to the faith of thinges to come as the resurrection c From the faith of God promising to the faith of man beleeuing as Ambrose Martyr thinke yet the fittest and best exposition is of the measure of one and the same faith from faith beginning to Faith encreasing toward perfection Faith so much the more it groweth so much the more it maketh men sure of their Iustification there be the like phrases to this else-where in holy Scripture as Psal. 84 8. from strength to strength 2. Cor. 3 16. from glory to glory first from one degree of strength and glory to another so heere from an infirme Faith to a firme Faith Therefore the meaning of this forme of speech is as if it should bee said that this righteousnesse of God is gotten not by the workes of the Law but by the Faith of the Gospell alone for degrees of Faith alter not the kind of Faith a weake and a strong Faith be but one Faith which without deed doth iustifie according to that which is afterward written for explication of this Text in Chap. 3. verse 22. Tim. What doe ye call the weake Faith Sil. An earnest and constant desire to know Christ and to make application of his mercies to our selues Tim. What is the highest degree of Faith Sil. To be fully perswaded of a mans owne Adoption and of his owne Saluation as Abraham and Paul Rom. 4 21 8 38 39. Tim. Who are heereby admonished Sil. Such as presume of full Faith when they haue none at all Secondly such as thinke they haue none because they haue so little and mingled with many imperfections Presumption and distrust are the extreames of a true Faith Tim. What bee the fruits whereby a weake Faith may bee knowne Sil. These First daily exercise of priuate prayer Secondly true loue of the word and of Gods Children because they be so Thirdly true sorrow for sinne and earnest endeauour to mortifie our lusts 〈◊〉 diligence in the duties of our perticular calling Lastly patience in aduersity Also the fruits of a strong Faith bee these First to cleaue to God in great dangers as Stephen and Paul did Secondly to suffer ioyfully the 〈◊〉 of goods and life for Christ and his word as Antipas and Hebrewes did Heb. 10 34. 〈◊〉 2 13. Thirdly to belieue the promises when all meanes fight against vs as Dauid and Abraham did Rom. 4 3 4 5. Fourthly great contempt of the world Fiftly great 〈◊〉 and confidence in prayer Rom. 8 15. Sixtly burning loue of the Brethren 1. Iohn 3 14. Seauenthly bountifull releeuing the poore members of Christ Iesus euen to the empairing of our owne substance 2. Cor. 8 3. for Christ his sake if neede and cause so require DIAL IX Verse 17. As it is written The iust shall liue by Faith Tim. WHat is the drift of these words Silas To proue by authority of Scripture that whosoeuer belieueth the Gospell shal be accounted righteous and so be saued This sentence of Habakuk is also an illustration as if Paul should say This Doctrine by Faith to be iustified agreeth with the Prophets and is neyther new or absurd Tim. What may we note in this Text. Silas Two things First the manner how this authority is brought in As it is written Secondly the authority it selfe The iust shall liue by Faith Tim. What was obserued in the manner of alleadging this authority Silas These few things First that Saint Paul citeth not so much the verse as the Booke of Scripture wherein it is written Secondly that he contenteth himselfe to proue Doctrine by authority of Scripture Thirdly that he citeth but one Testimony Fourthly that the Doctrine of free pardon and imputed righteousnesse is hard to bee perswaded vnto men yet hath witnesse from the Prophets It hath euer seemed to humane reason very repugnant and a thing vnlikely to be true that a wicked liuer a periured person a common lyer a railer an oppressor an vnchast liuer a blood-sucker or such like only by belieuing the Gospell should suddenly become iust and be accounted righteous and vnblameable Against which Doctrine the Papists to this day like Dogs doe barke railing at it and the Preachers of it saying that it ouerthrowes all Lawes and Discipline and takes away out of mens society all vse of punnishments and rewards laying open a gappe to all wickednesse if it should be preached that without righteous works without any habite or actions of iustice only by Faith in Christ sinners may bee iustified with God Therefore out of good discretion to stoppe the mouths of calumnious slanderers and to put humane reason to silence Paul citeth this place of the Prophet least he bee thought to haue brought in a Doctrine full of nouelty and absurdity it being receiued long before in the Iewish Church by authority of propheticall Oracle which is three times alleadged in the new Testament First Heere Secondly Gal. 3 11. Thirdly Heb. 10 〈◊〉 to illustrate this Doctrine of iustice and life eternall to be had by faith alone and howsoeuer the Prophet who first vsed these words might aime in part at the refreshing and comforting of the godly in those troublous times vnder
prouoke Gods patience not presuming of safety because of it but by it taking occasion of speedy turning to God least there come an after-clappe yea a most woefull reckoning in the end Tim. How else was this vengeance set forth Sil. By the cause in this word to thy selfe which signifieth that themselues brought all the mischiefe vppon their owne heads Tim. What vse of this Sil. It cleareth God from all cruelty seeing the cause of mans ruine is in himselfe as it is written O Israel thy destruction is of thy selfe Hosea 13 9. Secondly it teacheth all men to haue great care and heede to their owne hearts because all their woe springeth of themselues Aboue all things keep thy heart Pro. 4. 23. Tim. How else was this vengeance declared and set forth in our Text Sil. By the circumstance of time when it shall bee rendred namely at the great and last day Tim. What should this teach Sil. That howsoeuer euen in this life God doe often inflict vengeance vpon impenitent hardned sinners yet there is much reserued to the day of iudgement Tim. How is this day expressed Sil. By these termes first wrath which importeth the heauinesse of the vengeance comming from Gods hot indignation and fury The second terme is reuelation whereby we are admonished that the things now hid and kept close here shall be there opened and made most manifest to our selues and all others see the 16. verse of this Chapter The third tearme is Iustice to teach that in that fearefull iudgement God will proceede by right without doing the least wrong to any for how should the Iudge of the world do vniustly Gods bountie and kindnesse taketh place in blessing and forbearing but if these be abused then his Iustice sheweth it selfe in punishing Tim. What is to be learned from hence Silas That in all the course of our life and in euery particular action thereof the minde ought to looke to this Iudgement that so we may be made watchfull and learne to walke with God as thorough his mercie in Christ we may be counted worthy to escape the vengeance to come DIAL IIII. Verse 6. For God will reward euery one according to his Workes Tim. WHat is the drift of this Scripture Silas To lay forth the equity of Gods Distributiue Iustice because hee doth not take vengeance but vpon precedent cause giuen from mens euill workes It is Iustice to giue to euery one that which is his But God doth so giuing to good men good things and euill things to euill men therefore he is iust Tim. What things were considered in this Scripture Sil. Foure things First the person of the Iudge God Secondly the certainty of a iudgement He will reward Thirdly the persons to bee iudged Euery one Lastly the measure of this Iudgement According to his workes Tim. What note ye from the person of the Iudge Silas His infinite Wisedome his Power and Iustice whereby hee infinitely knoweth and hateth perfectly and is able also to punish all sinne most extreamly For he is Omnipotent and the searcher of the hearts and Reines Tim. What Vse was made heereof Silas That hauing such a Iudge we ought alwaies to liue in feare especially seeing wee are in his presence euer vnder his eye who neither can be hindered nor deceiued by any nor yet will erre in iudgement Tim. How was the certainty of a Iudgement proued Sil. First by the testimony of Scripture Mat. 25 31 2 Cor. 5 10. Rom. 14 10. Acts 17 31. Secondly by this reason that God will giue good thinges to good men and euill thinges to euill men 2 Thes. 1 6 7. which hee doth not in this world and therefore there is a Iudgement after this life Tim. What vse was made heereof Sil. First it mooueth the sinner to repentance Acts 17 30. Secondly it moueth the righteous to watchfulnesse Watch therefore Math. 24 42. Thirdly it teacheth all men Charity not to Iudge others seeing one is Iudge of al. And fourthly patience in aduersity because God will one day 〈◊〉 all matters Tim. Who are the persons to be iudged Silas Euery one of what age sexe or estate soeuer All persons and euery one without any exemption or exception must appeare and be iudged Tim. What learned we from this Silas First it must teach humility to the mighty seeing they are to be iudged as well as the mean Secondly it doth comfort abiect Christians which are patient because they shall neuer be forgotten in that day Tim. What is the rule and measure of this iudgement Sil. Mens workes by which is meant not only deeds and words but also thoughts and counsels of the heart Eccl. 12 verse last Tim. What was learned from hence Sil. What a great care is to be had of our thoughtes seeing we must be countable for them Tim. But wil it not follow of this that we may merit by our Workes Silas No verily for the Apostle prooueth heere the quite contrary because none can bring the workes of the Law perfect therefore none can looke to be iustified before God by his workes Again it is not written God will Iudge For but according to our workes Moreouer they cannot merit because they are not our owne Fourthly because they are a debt due to God the creature oweth all to the Creator but he is Debter to none Lastly there is no proportion betweene them the reward the one being finite the other infinite both in time and measure but howsoeuer good workes cannot bee an euen rule of merit with God as they be with men yet they are a manifest rule of equity For it is good reason that it go well or ill with vs as we haue done either good or euill Tim. But euill workes merit eternall death Silas True because they are our owne and bee perfect so be not our good workes for they are wrought in vs by Gods Spirit and be vnperfect Tim. But it wil destroy al care of good workes if we denie the merit of them Silas Not so but the quite contrary for where there is in any an opinion of merite there can bee no good workes done because in such persons all thinges are done of selse-loue with respect to their owne welfare and not out of loue to Gods glory and such workes as are done out of selfe-loue to merit withall cannot bee good for though the substance of the worke be good yet the manner and end of it is naught and thus are no good workes done in all Popery Tim. What then be the conditions of a good worke Silas These three First that they come from faith Rom. 14 23. Secondly that they be commanded of God in his word Deut. 12. 32. Thirdly that they be referred to Gods glory 1 Cor. 10 31. Tim. For what causes are they to be done Silas That God may be glorified Math. 5 16. our saluation assured 2 Pet. 1 10. our neighbors edified our faith testified Iames 2 14. our Charity exercised Iames
shall no flesh be iustified in his sight for by the Law commeth the knowledge of sin Tim. WHat is the drift of this Text Silas Hauing hitherto at large proued all to be sinners he will proue that Iustification and absolution from sinne commeth not by the workes of the Lawe which now he proueth by this reason the Law sheweth vs our sinne and conuinceth vs as guilty of sinne therefore it doth not absolue and quit vs from sin The reason is taken from the Law of contraries which cannot at once in one respect be affirmed of one thing Tim. What doth he meane by the workes of the Law Silas Not simply the workes of the Law as they are commanded of God but as they are performed of vs vnperfectly and with many slips For the Law simply considered without relation to vs could iustifie vs. Tim. What doth he meane by Law Silas Hee meaneth the Lawe both of nature and of Moyses and by workes hee meaneth not ceremoniall workes onely but the morall That the moral is chiefly meant may appeare vnto vs by these reasons First because he had cited testimonies which speake of morall vices Secondly this effect to know sinne is chiefely by the morall Law Thirdly moral workes are greatest cause of glorying Fourthly because all kinde of working is set against beleeuing as contraries and repugnant the one to the other in the cause of forgiuenesse of sinnes and saluation of sinners Tim. What meaneth he by No flesh Sil. No man but the Apostle saith rather no flesh then no man especially to note what men are without Christ to wit a lumpe of flesh and corruption full of weaknesse sinfull infirmity being vnapt of our selues to bring forth any thing which is good Tim. What doth Iustifie import signifie Silas To pardon sinne to absolue and acquit sinners and to approoue one for righteous and not either to declare iust so works iustifie or to make actually iust This were perfection of inhaaerent Iustice which none hath Tim. What was learned from this Sil. That the Apostle speaketh not against the doing of workes but against the trust in them and putting merit of righteousnesse in them we ought to labour in the doing of good workes but wee cannot claime forgiuenesse of sinnes and eternall life by the worthinesse of them Tim. What is that he saith In his sight Silas This phrase is vsed heere not to note hypocrisie but the imperfection of the best workes for hee teacheth that the most perfect workes of the best men come farre short of beeing able to abide the rigour of Gods Iustice because the best workes of Gods Saintes haue both wants and staines in them and cannot therefore endure the seuere and strict iudgement of God in whose fight it is Christ alone that makes beleeuers holy and vnblameable Col. 1 22. Tim. What should this worke in vs Sil. Humility and lowly conceite of our owne best doings which God might worthily cast out and the doers of them if with a iust eie he did behold them Tim. What is meant hereby that the knowledge of sinne is said to come by the Law Sil. That the law serueth both to shew vs what is sinne and doth also argue or reproue vs of sinne and for this end is this alleadged euen to make it plaine that righteousnesse and pardon of sinne doe not come from the law For as a felon or Traytor conuicted by some statute lawe of a capitall crime it were solly and madnesse for such an one to looke to be acquitted by that law which did shew and condemne his crime to death In like manner it is spirituall phrensie to looke for absolution and life from the law of Moyses seeing it is giuen to conuict vs as guilty of death through sinne Yet such mad furious fooles our Papists be as they presume to finde righteousnesse and life where nothing but sinne and death can be found therefore doth the law reueale sinne and terrifie the Conscience and shew death and condemnation to be due vnto transgressors which is contrary to iustifying DIAL XI Verse 21. But now is the righteousnesse of God made manifest without the law hauing witnesse of the law and the Prophets Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Text Sil. To teach how Gods elect doe attaine vnto true and perfect righteousnesse before God to wit not by their workes but euen by the faith of Iesus Christ for seeing there is no other way to haue righteousnesse but either by workes or faith and by workes it cannot be had therefore by faith Tim. How many things are heere to be considered Sil. Foure First the circumstance of time Now. Secondly what is the 〈◊〉 of God Thirdly how this is manifest and how manifest without the law Fourthly what witnesse it hath from the Prophets Tim. What is meant by Now this particle of time Sil. That is at this present time wherein Paul and the other Apostles of Iesus Christ did preach the word Tim. What did we learne from this circumstance Sil. That God hath his appointed time for all his works Eccles. 3 1. which should teach patience and waiting vpon God Secōdly that the time of the gospel hath a more cleer reuelation of Gods good will to the elect then that of the law which should breed thankfulnes for so great a mercy Tim. What is heere called the righteousnesse of God Sil. Not that whereby himselfe is righteous for that is his owne essence and is not communicated to vs but that righteousnesse which is after called the righteousnesse of Christ and the righteousnesse of faith euen that righteousnesse which is by faith in Christ who is made perfect iustice to all which doe beleeue in him Tim. Why is this called the righteousnesse of God of Christ and of Faith Sil. It is called the righteousnes of God both from the cause and the effect in asmuch as it is not of vs and our workes in part or in whole nor from any man but it is the guift of God Secondly it is that onely which God in his strict iustice approueth and for which we are accepted with him also it is called the righteousnesse of Christ and of Faith because Christ in his man-hood wrought it by his obedience to death and our faith is that instrument wherby we attaine to it and receiue it that it may be our owne for our full Iustification before God vnto life eternall Tim. How did the Apostles make this manifest to the world Sil. After this sort First they preached repentance setting before mens eyes their sinnes and their iust and fearefull condemnation thereby Secondly they gathered together out of the Scripture the properties of that Christ which should heale these euils Thirdly they applied the same properties to Iesus of Nazareth Fourthly they beseech and exhort all men to beleeue in him as their onely Sauiour See Acts 2 22. and 10 36. and 13 26. Tim. What followeth in such as belieue such
things Sil. First they obtained remission of sinnes Secondly they were made inwardly new and outwardly they liued hohly Thirdly they called vpon God with perseuerance communicating together in prayer doctrine breaking of bread and all holy workes Fourthly they stedfastly put their trust in God Fistly they regarded not riches for they laid the price of their things at the Apostles feete Sixtly they gaue testimony of Christ boldly Seauenthly in his quarrell they bestowed their liues and cheerefully shedde their bloud For proose of all these haue your recourse to the history of the Acts. Tim. How is this righteousnes manifested without the law Sil. That is without the workes of the law or without this that the law be fulfilled of vs for some Gentiles were iustified which knew not the lawe also some Iewes were iustified which regarded not the lawe and though some did both knowe regard and doe it as Nathanael and Zachary yet the obseruation of the law by them was not the cause why they were iustified The law then is an helpe to iustification in somuch as it doth accuse and condemn vs and so driues vs to Christ accidentally as a disease brings to the Phisition but the law of it selfe hath no strength to forgiue sinne and to suggest and work faith into our harts or to enable vs to keepe it perfectly that we might bee iustified thereby Tim. How many wayes hath this righteousnes witnes of the law and the Prophets Sil. Sundry waies First by euident and cleere sentences which prophesied of Christ and of faith that iustifieth Secondly by tipes and figures which went before in the old Testament as the brasen Serpent and Ionas his beeing in the Whales belly three daies also the Paschall Lambe the Rocke the Cloud did shew Christ. Thirdly by Sacrifices Offerings and ceremonies of the law the bloud of Lambs Goates did signifie Christ to be slain for sin Fourthly by the Sacraments as Circumcision and the Passeouer all which doe beare testimony that our righteousnes remission of our sinnes and eternall life are not to bee founde in our selues but to be sought by faith in Iesus Christ. DIAL XII Verse 22. I meane the righteousnes of God through the faith of Iesus Christ in all and ouer all that heleeue Tim. IN what sence is the faith of Iesus vsed here Sil. Not actiuely for that which Iesus had but passiuely for that faith whereby hee is had and receiued Tim. What is the drift of this text Sil. To open and vnsold more at large that which hee spake concerning the righteousnes of God laying foorth first the instrument whereby it is applied vnto vs which is faith Secondly the persons or subiect vppon whome it is bestowed which be all beleeuers without difference of nations Thirdly the efficient and principall cause of righteousnes which is God And fourthly the materiall cause which is Iesus Christ. Tim. What is the righteousnes of God Sil. That which commeth meerly by Gods good guift and maketh vs acceptable to God euen able to stand before God this righteousnesse wee doe attaine through faith which iustifieth obiectiuely because it leadeth to Christ and instrumentally as the hand of the soule to apprehend it therefore it is written the righteousnes of God through faith Tim. What are the kinds of faith Sil. Foure first historicall which is a knowledge of the history and letter or of the doctrine of the Scripture thence called dogmaticall faith Secondly temporarie faith which is a knowledge of the trueth with an assent to it for a time Math. 13. 21. Thirdly miraculous which is a beleefe that by the power of God straunge wonders may be done 1 Corin. 13. 1 2. Fourthly iustifying faith by the which the righteousnes of God is receiued Of this iustifying faith there are two parts the first is a knowledge of the things to be beleeued as Iohn 6. 69. wee know and beleeue Secondly application of them to our selues Tim. How proue ye that there must bee application in true faith Sil. First by the commaundement beleeue the Gospell Marke 16 1 5. Secondly by the nature of faith which is an hand to drawe Christ to vs. Thirdly by the example of Scripture as Dauid Psalme 18 2. Mary Luke 1 28. Thomas Iohn 20 28. Fourthly by reason for howe can Christ profit vs if he be not applied and put on by faith And 5. by the testimony of the learned which teach true faith to be particular with application as Hierom Cyril c. Tim. What actions are required vnto faith Sil. These fiue First approbation of the things beleeued Secondly expetition in an ernest desire of them 3 〈◊〉 apprehension in a fast laying hold of them Fourthly oblectation in delighting my selfe in them Fiftly expectation in looking certainly to inioy them Tim. What be the degrees of faith Silas Three-fold First such a faith which is a true and earnest desire to beleeue the promises of Christ. Secondly a little faith which is a certaine assurance that the same belongs to vs. Thirdly a full perswasion when the heart is strongly assured thereof ioyned with a sure and certaine knowledge of things hoped for Heb. 11 1. Tim. What is the obiect of Faith Silas Christ Iesus in whom wee do consider three things First his person God and Man Secondly his Offices King Priest and Prophet Thirdly his benefits Remission of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 reconciliation adoption sanctification eternall life Tim. What are the persons vnto whom God 〈◊〉 Christ with his benefits Sil. All the beleeuers and onely the beleeuers Tim. What thinke ye of the elect Infants are they Beleeuers Tim. Some think them to be iustified by the beleefe of the Church Others thinke it to be by the beleefe of their parents Others by the beleefe of sureties Others by some secret worke of the spirit But I think that they are saued by their owne faith as it is generally written The iust shall liue by his owne faith Tim. But they want knowledge without which there is no Faith Sil. True they lacke knowledge which is by discourse yet they are not altogither without some knowledge such as for their age they are capeable of as appeareth by this that reason is in children though they want the vse of it Also by the example of Ieremy Iohn Baptist and Christ all which had the light of the Spirit in their infancy being sanctified in the wombe Tim. What vse was made of this Sil. That men which haue not true faith should labor to get it seeing no righteousnes is had without it nor saluation but by it Secondly such as haue it should cherish and labour to encrease it by all good means and be thankfull to God for it Thirdly to take comfort to our selues vpon the death of young children seeing God who hath made a Couenant of life with them doeth worke in them to beleeue in him DIAL XIII Verse 23 24. For there is no difference for all haue sinned and are
the promise therefore also he had righteousnes by beleeuing Thus most commonly the purpose and connexion of this text is laide downe by interpreters But Maister Beza and Paraeus wil haue it not a new argumēt to proue the principall thing in question viz that righteousnesse is by faith for this is not the thing concluded but the medius terminus or reason to inferre a conclusion premised in verse 12. that the children of Abraham are they onely which walke in the steppes of Abrahams faith not they which walke in the steppes of his circumcision or works for the lawe viz. workes of the lawe naturall or written is nothing to this child-ship as I may speak reason is because the promise giuen to Abraham to bee heire of the worlde or to haue the world his inheritance came to him by the righteousnesse of faith therefore they which walke not in Abrahams workes but in his faith be his children as Abraham became their father not by his working but by beleeuing If this sence and coherence be iudged best then by world the beleeuers dispersed and scattered ouer the worlde is meant also there is an Ellipsis of the worde giuen which should bee added to promise and the particle disiunctiue or hath couched in it a close obiection as thus Be it that the promise of being father of many nations and heire of the world were giuen to Abraham on condition of his beleeuing yet to his seed it might be on condition of workes no saith Paul in no wise the reason is rendred in the next verse because so the promise of the inheritance and faith should be void and of no effect Tim. What is meant here by the world as you doe Iudge Sil. Some say the land of Canaan at least typically and mystically some by it vnderstād all the beleeuers which are dispersed through the worlde as is aforesaide some by it vnderstand all the creatures of the world which are the inheritance of Abraham and euery faithfull person and I take it to be meant of the world to come euen of the possession of saluation in heauen of the celestiall inheritance That this is the meaning may appeare by the whole former treatise of iustification also by the 14. verse of this Chapter wherein by heire none can bee meant but the heires of eternal life if any think good to ioyne this sense and that of Paraeus and Beza together as subordinate one to the other it is not a misse Tim. What learne ye hereby that this inheritauce of heauen dependeth vpon the promise of grace Sil. That beleeuers may surely looke to haue it in the end because the promise doth not deceiue seeing it is his promise which cannot lye Secondly wee learne that it behoueth the faithfull to haue an eye still vpon the promises and to haue their refuge thither when they shall be assaulted as a chased Hart flies to the colde broke and the fearfull Coney to the rocke or borrow so wee being tempted run to the promises Tim. Vpon what condition was this promise giuen or made of God to Abraham Silas Not vpon condition that he should fulfill the Law because the Lawe was published long after the promise and therefore could be no condition thereof againe none can possibly keepe the Law But the promise was giuen vpon condition of beleeuing namely that Abraham his seede should embrace it by faith Tim. What doth this shew vnto vs Si. The necessity of Faith in that we are not partakers of the promises without it 2. the excelency of faith that to it the greatest promises are made Lastly frō hence we are exhorted to labour and striue to attaine the guift of Faith and to encrease it if we haue it labouring against hinderances Let this be further noted that though this promise giuen to Abraham bee chiefly accomplished in the heauenly inheritance yet it cōprehends the church of Christ ouer the world as a spirituall heritage yea the right to temporall things in this world 1 Cor. 3 21. and all this thorough Christ the promised seed DIAL VIII Verse 14. For if they which bee of the Law bee heyres then is faith but vaine and the promise made of none effect because the law causeth wrath for where no Law is there is no transgression Tim. WHat is the drift of this Text Silas To proue that the inheritance of heauen is not giuen on this condition that the Law be fulfilled by vs and therefore it is giuen on condition of beleeuing This is proued by a reason taken from absurdities or from contraries which is thus That if the inheritance be got by fulfilling the law then faith is void and the promise of none effect or more plainly thus If saluation bee giuen on condition of woorking or doing then it must needs be that faith which beleeues the promise is idle and so the promise is also idle and frustrate which were an absurd thing either to thinke or speake so for God neither doth or promiseth ought in vaine Tim. Hath the reason good waight and firmenesse if it bee framed from the law of contraries Sil. Yea for to haue saluation by merite of our workes and to beleeue that it is giuen vs by vertue of a free promise these two are so contrary that if merit bee granted beleeuing is clean destroyed and if beleefe be taken away then the promise vanisheth the promise the law workes and fauour in this case of iustification cannot agree together as Rom. 4. 4. Tim. What is meant by them which be of the law Sil. This phrase in Scripture signifieth two things first by them of the law is meant the Iewes which are circumcised to whom the law was giuen Secondly such as challenge claime saluation by merit of works or vpon condition to fulfill the lawe so it is taken here now the lawe thus taken for merit of workes doth suppose a debt destroyeth grace being quite opposite to the promise Tim. What is meant by this that faith is vaine and the promise voyd Sil. That is to say faith should be required of vs in vain and the promise of God made in vaine if the inheritance of heauen came by workes but it were a very absurd and wicked thing to say thus as apeareth by these reasons First because God doeth nothing in vaine Secondly because none can in any wise keepe that condition of fulfilling the law therefore the promise of grace and faith bee most needfull and necessary without which our mind would alwayes be full of distrust the law being vnpossible Tim. But if the law and the promise be so contrary that the putting of the one destroyeth the other howe is it that God hath annexea so many promises to the law Sil. There is a difference to bee put betweene the promises of the law and of the Gospel for the promises of the Gospell bee of remission of sinnes iustification the holy Ghost saluation these are not made to the lawe that is
lewde liuers and Idolatrous See Rom. 1. 20. 21. 22. c. Ephe. 2. 1. 2. also chapter 4. 18. 19. c. Tim. Yea but in the 2. of the Romanes Paul sayeth that they did the things of the law by nature Silas True if we respect the outward discipline and gouernment of the common wealth for they commaunded and rewarded many vertues they forbad and punished many vices as theft murder adultery c. but tonching their priuate life they were for the most part very virious and enemies to all honesty resisting Christ his Gospel and Apostles And this is that which is meant here euen more then is sayed that they followed not that is they fledde from it and abhorred it and stroue against it Tim. What doctrine from hence Silas First wee learne that all men before grace are vnrighteous and thereby guilty of wrath Secondly that in mans will naturally there can be no power to moue him to that which is good for it carries him directly to that which is against the law much lesse can men before grace merite excongrue Thirdly that faith touching the beginning of it is in no wise frō man himselfe for it is giuen for we can make ourselues no more able to beleeue then wee can make ourselues to liue for wee liue to God by saith and till then wee are dead Lastly from hence wee learne that predestination is a most powerfull thing because it brings to a calling to faith to Christ and to saluation euen those which thinke vpon nothing lesse nay euen those which doe striue against it as these Gentiles here named and the theefe on the Crosse and Paul and Manasses and innumerable others Tim. What vse is to be made of this last point Silas It teacheth vs that neyther willing nor running purpose nor endeauour can get a man to bee a beleeuer though men must doe their parts yet all depends vpon the grace of God which wee see euen without any labour conferreth grace and righteousnesse there where God pleaseth to giue it Secondly it 〈◊〉 great sinners and helpeth them against despaire because neyther multitude nor greatnesse of sinnes nor long continuance in them nor all the power of Sathan shall hinder the conuersion of any who belong to Gods election Thirdly it stirreth vp the godly to consider whence they haue all graces which they inioy namely from Gods eternall and powerfull mercy which serueth both for humbling them and mouing them to hearty thankfulnesse Tim. What is meant by attaine Silas To apprehend lay hold on and receiue some thing giuen Tim. What signifies righteousnesse Silas That perfect iustice of Christ which hee wrought in his owne person by his owne sufferings and doings which consistes in remission of sinnes and imputation of his obedience See Rom. 3. Tim. But is not this absurd that the Gentiles which were vnrighteous should receiue righteousnesse Silas No because they had faith to receiue Christ who is the end of the law for righteousnesse to all that beleeue in him Rom. 10 4. Tim. But how can righteousnesse and vnrighteousnesse meet together in one person Silas Very well the righteousnesse of faith may bee found in him who wants the righteousnesse of workes howbeit when the righteousnesse of faith comes a mans owne vnrighteousnesse is done away as touching the guilt of it and the Spirit begins a righteous life in them that they may in some measure thinke and do righteous things Tim. What doctrines are wee to gather from these last words Silas That the righteousnesse of Christ and the gift of faith doe differ the one from the other for faith is wrought in vs by Gods guift as a hand to take it the righteousnesse of Christ stickes in his owne person as in the subiect purchased by his death and obedience Also this is perfect appeasing Gods wrath the other is vnperfect needing Gods pardon Secondly from hence wee learne that seeing the iustice of Christ is receiued therefore it is bestowed as a free gift not by merite of works Thirdly we learne that the iustice whereby we are righteous before God is no inherent quality in our selues because it comes from without vs namely from Christs obedience imputed to faith faith finds none in vs but borrowes of Christ. Tim. What is the vse of this last point of Doctrine Silas It confutes the Papists who seeke perfect righteousnesse by their owne works proceeding from faith Secondly it humbles and giues from vs the whole glory of our righteousnesse to Christ from whence we take it as a poore begger an 〈◊〉 from a bountifull rich king Tim. What other thing learne we hence Silas Heere is a notable place to prooue that all elect finners are iustifyed by grace euen by faith in Christ without the workes of the Law for it was giuen to the 〈◊〉 who had no good workes onely because they beleeued Lastly such as are endued with a liuely faith may thereby be certaine of their owne election iustification and saluation by Christ. For euery beeleeuer knowes himselfe to be iustified and hee that is iustified knowes that he is elect and he that is elect must needes be saued because Gods decree is vnchangeable Therefore hee that once knowes his owne faith may thereby be confident and sure of eternall life according to the tenour of the Gospell euery where promising life euerlasting to faith therefore to him who can truely say I beleeue the truth wil tell him thou art iust by Christ and must liue for euer with him The certainty then of election is no where to be found but in the Gospell DIAL XX. Verse 31 32. But Israel which followed the Law of Righteousnesse could not attaine vnto the Lawe of righteousnesse Wherefore because they sought it not by Faith but as it were by the workes of the Law Tim. VVHat is the summe of this Text Silas It containes the second part of Pauls answere vnto the question mooued in the thirtieth verse it consists in two things First in a proposition which is this that the Iewes though they followed righteousnesse found it not The second part containes the Reasons heereof which bee two the one is because they sought it not by faith the other is because they sought it by workes Tim. What is meant heere by Israel Silas The Iewes who descended from Iacob who was called Israel Tim. What is meant by the Law of righteousnesse Silas The righteousnesse of the Law or those righteous workes which the Law prescribeth to be done perfectly and promised life to the doers of them Tim. What signifieth followed Sil. An earnest desire endeauor to do those workes it is a speech borrowed from such as run in a race which striue hard to come to the goale So were these Iews verie zealous of the Law to keepe it Acts 22 3. and as Paul witnesseth of himselfe Phil. 3 6. Tim. What is meant by not attaining Silas It is a speech borrowed from
runners which come not to the Goale though they striue towardes it so these Iewes though they intended to follow the rule of the Law which teacheth a perfect righteousnesse yet they were neuer able to come at it Tim. What Doctrine ariseth from this whole Verse Silas That such as seeke to be iustified by their owne workes shall neuer finde righteousnesse for the Iewes heere spoken of sought to be righteous by dooing the Law and yet could not attaine vnto the righteousnesse of the Law Tim. But this is straunge that they should not finde which seeke and yet the Scripture promiseth that such as seeke shall finde Silas Indeede it is strange euen a Paradox to naturall reason but the cause will appear to be that they sought amisse as men may pray and not obtaine because they pray amisse so men may follow righteousnesse and yet not get it if they seeke it amisse Tim. Yet shew mee why they that endeauour to dee righteousnesse should not haue that righteousnesse that the Lawe requires Sil. Because the Law sets forth such a righteousnesse as no meere man is able to performe It is certaine could any man performe the Law perfectly it would make him righteous and giue him eternall life as it written Doe this and liue Gal. 3 12. Leuit. 18 8. but this absolute perfection of the Lawe can no flesh attaine vnto no not Gods owne regenerate Children when they are at the best for if We say we haue no sinne we are Lyars 1 Iohn 1 10. There is an impossibiltiy of keeping those two commandements to loue with all the heart and not to lust Hence it is that men easily misse of that righteousnesse which yet they may much sweat for and take exceeding paines to haue it againe There is yet another cause why they may misse of it although they labour much for it because none can seeke to bee saued by their owne workes without contempt of Christ in whome alone true righteousnesse is to bee founde for if one doe but once thinke that he may bee saued by his owne doings it argues that that man doth iudge himselfe to stand in no need of Christs doings and sufferings and so he makes the death of Christ voyd and frustrate Gal. 2. 21. Tim. What vse hereof Silas First it teacheth how miserable supersticious Papists and blinde Protestants are for they looking to haue Gods fauour and euerlasting life by their own deseruings they are most sure to loose forgoe it These are vnder a double misery first that they neuer get the righteousnes that they striue for and besides that they loose that true and perfect righteousnes of Christ. Secondly it confutes the Papists who teach the keeping of the law to bee possible for then were righteousnesse to bee attained by our doing the law Thirdly it humbles the godly to consider that how many or good soeuer their workes bee yet they come farre short of righteousnesse and therfore they must be forced to say Lord enter not into iudgement with thy seruant for no flesh is righteous in thy sight Psal. 143. 2. Tim. Is there not some other thing to be learned from this verse Silas Yes euen this that the prouidence of God is wonderfull bestowing righteousnesse and eternall life vppon his elect ones The reason hereof is because he bestowes it on such as neuer intended it and kept it from such as much laboured for it Tim. What vse of this poynt Silas It serues exceedingly to extoll the grace of God of which alone it commeth that men are iustified and saued Secondly it greatly humbles the pride of mans hart by thinking that whatsoeuer they doe for their owne saluation yet nothing is to bee attributed vnto their owne deedes Tim. Yet are not all men bound to doe what lies in them to get righteousnes and life Silas Yes verily both for the commandement sake that bids them striue and for the promise sake which is made to seekers and knockers Thirdly because this is enough to condemne a man if he saile of doing his owne part in procuring his owne saluation And lastly because God doeth not vsually bestowe his grace and Spirite vpon the secure snorting and idle but vpon the painfull and carefull Christian as hee giues his earthly blessing to the diligent hand and not to the slothfull Notwithstanding all this God is not mooued by any thing that wee doe to call and iustifie vs but it is onely out of his owne good pleasure and mercy and therefore none haue cause to glory or reioyce saue onely in this that they knowe him to bee their mercifull Father 〈◊〉 9. 2. and that themselues when they haue done all they can are vnworthy of any thing Luke 17. 10. Tim. What is it to seeke righteousnes by faith Silas To study and desire to become righteous by beleeuing in Christ. Tim. What is our doctrine from hence Silas That the onely way to finde righteousnesse is to seeke it by faith the reasons be first the commandement of God Secondly his promise The iust shall liue by faith Rom. 1 17. Thirdly because the perfect righteousnesse of the law is not to bee found out of Christ and hee is not otherwise to be had then by faith by which he dwels in our hearts Ephe. 3 17. Fourthly no man can liue and doe so righteously but that hee must neede remission of sinnes because there still will bee some thing vnperfect and all Scriptures teach that forgiuenesse of sin is not to bee had but by faith Acts 10 43. Therefore faith onely is that which iustifies the elect sinners before God as charity doth sit before men Tim. What vse of this point Silaas It reproues such as dislike the doctrine of righteousnesse by Faith onely directly or indirectly saying it is too much taught that the reaching of it doth much hurt these be ignorant speeches Secondly it teacheth vs the high and ready way how to seeke righteousnesse namely by beleeuing that wee are vnrighteous in our selues and no righteousnesse to be found but in Christ and in comparison of him to iudge all our workes to be dung Phil. 3 8. That therefore euery Christians dutie is as he desi es to be righteous and to be saued that he get this precious gift of faith without the which no Iustification nor life can be had Tim. What is meant by the workes of the Law Sil. The merit and desert of workes as in all places where workes are set against Faith or Grace or Christ there they signify merit and not barely the dooing of a good worke as a fruite of faith Tim. What is our Doctrine from hence Silas That our owne workes do not merit righteousnesse and eternal life This is true as well of those works which are done of grace as those which are done of naturall strength For of all workes the Apostle affirmes that hee that seekes righteousnesse by them can neuer
we trust not in our owne workes to haue righteousnes and life thereby least through pride wee fall into the same condemnation as these Iewes did whome if God spared not for their vnbeleefe how will he spare vs Tim. But what did follow the pride of the Iewes Sil. A wicked contempt of the righteousnesse of God for they would not be subiect vnto it Tim. What is it not to be subiect to the righteousnesse of God Silas Not to receiue it being offered but stubbornly to refuse it to cast it from vs as a thing superfluous Tim. What doctrine ariseth from hence Silas That ignorant proud iusticiaties which trust in the merites of their owne workes are rebels against God and his grace for it is rebellion against God to resist his will in his promises as well as in his commandements For as rebels will not bee subiect to their Prince but rise vp in armes against him partly because they are ignorant of the Princes power and partly because they are highly conceited of their owne strength So Pharisaicall iusticiaries and merit-mongers because they knowe not the perfect exact iustice of Christ and doe too highly thinke of their owne righteousnes thence it is that they onely entertaine not but reiect the grace of Christ with disdainesulnesse a most miserable condition Tim. Come we now to the distinction of righteousnes and tell vs what it is Sllas Either Gods righteousnesse or our owne this distinction was set down before in cha 9. in other termes righteousnes of law and of faith Tim. What doe ye call Gods righteousnes Silas It consists in the forgiuenesse of our sinnes by Christs sufferings and the imputation of his perfect obedience for our perfect iustice before God Rom. 3. 4. 5. whereas our owne stands in working and our doings Tim. What further difference is there in this double righteousnesse Silas They differ in respect of the subiect for the one sticks in our selues the other is without vs in Christs manhoode Secondly they differ in the forme for our owne righteousnesse comes vnto vs by our owne working but Gods comes vnto vs by free guist and imputation of it to our faith Thirdly in efficacy for the one merites remission of sinnes and eternall life the other deserues nothing saue in strict iustice eternall death but is acceptable to God through Christ by approbation not of iustice but by acceptation of grace Tim. What is to be learned out of the comparison of this double righteousnes Silas That such as sticke to their owne righteousnesse trusting to their owne works shall neuer enioy the righteousnesse of faith or of Christ. The reason is because in the matter of saluation there is a flat contrariety between grace and merite Christ and Moses so as by no meanes they can agree together See Rom. 11 6 Gal. 2. 21. 5. 2. 4. Tim. What is the vse heereof Silas That all popish Iusticiaries and merite-mongers which so liue so dye are in most wretched condition for that righteousnesse of works which they follow they loose it because they can neuer bee able to keepe the Law withall by hauing confidence in their owne merites they neuer attaine Christs righteousnesse and so dye in their sinnes without pardon or saluation Secondly it exhorts all Christians for eternall life to depend vpon the grace of God and merit of his Sonne renouncing all selfe worthinesse euen as they couet and desire to be partakers of the righteousnesse of God vnto absolution for sinne and euerlasting saluation in heauen for God wil saue none but such as being humbled in the sight of their owne vnworthinesse and misery doe reioyce and glory in Christ oncly Rom. 5 11. 1. Cor. 1. 29 31. 1. Pet. 4. DIAL IIII. Verse 4 5. For Christ is the ende of the Law for righteousnesse vnto euery one that belesueth For Moses thus describeth the c. Tim. VVHat doth these two verses containe Silas Paul doth heere set vpon the third parte of this Chapter to wit the confirmation of the twofold righteousnesse which he propounded verse 3. and to shewe that the righteousnesse of faith is that alone which is to be sought after for our iustification and for our meriting eternall life Tim. How doth the Apostle proue that we are to follow the righteousnesse of faith rather then of workes Silas By two reasons contained in this present text the first is this That Christ is the end of the Lawe for righteousnesse but it is certaine that wee doe receiue Christ Iesus rather by beleeuing then by working Therfore wee must seeke to bee iustified before God by faith and not by workes Or thus The lawe serueth to send vs vnto Christ therefore we are iustified by beleeuing in Christ who is the end of the law by fulfilling it and not by the workes of the lawe which wee doe The other reason is taken from the property of the lawe which requireth perfect keeping of it vnto righteousnesse life verse 5. but the perfect keeping of the law is vnpossible to vs therefore wee cannot haue righteousnesse by the workes of the law but by faith in Christ. Or thus 〈◊〉 righteousnesse is impossible to be had which promiseth life vpon an vnpossible condition but the righteousnesse of the law is such therefore it is impossible and not to be sought after by vs but on the contrary the righteousnesse of faith being possible to bee had therefore it is to be followed of vs and rested in onely Tim. What be the parts of the fourth verse Silas Two First in what sence and meaning Christ is the end of the law And secondly how and to whom Tim. What is the connexion of this verse with the former Sil. By a preoccupation making answere to a secret obiection of the Iewes who might say and pleade that they sought for themselues no other righteousnesse thē that the law requireth and that being the true righteousnesse therefore they could not erre in their zeale for it Againe they being affraide to be excluded from this true righteousnesse if they admitted Christ therefore did not they imbrace him Vnto this their obiection the Apostle answeres that indeed the Iewes did not seek true righteousnes because they contemned Christ who is the end of the law for righteousnesse to beleeuers and therefore they had no cause to feare the loosing of the righteousnesse of the law by cleauing to Christ who is the end of it Or the connexion may be this to render 〈◊〉 why the Iewes through ignorance and pride refused the righteousnesse of God because they knew not Christ who is the end of the law for righteousnesse Tim. What law is meant heere Sil. By law is meant both ceremoniall and morall but chiefely the morall law of the ten Commandements Tim. In what sence and meaning is Christ saide to bee the end of the Law Silas This worde End hath foure significations in Scriptures
Shame what it is to the godly and vngodly what it works in both ibid. Shame why mentioned rather then any other fruit of sinne ibid. Sinne the nature kindes filthinesse and danger of it ch 6. v. 23. Sinne to liue in it what Ch 6. v. 1. Sinne to abound what ch 5 v. 20. Sin how first husband ch 7 v. 4. Sinne how mortified and dead not in a moment cha 7. v. 4 5 6. Sins our cause of Christs death and what it shoulde admonish vs of ch 4. v. last ch 5 8. Sinnes none veniall in their owne nature ch 6. v 23. Sins how venial ib. Supper of the Lord howe to prepare to it ch 2. v. 25. T. Tribulatiou see affliction Trust in God see faith Truth of God is for our comfort and imitation Ch. 3 v. 3 4 5 6 7. Truth of God not impeached by mens vnbeliefe Ib. Truth of God how renow ned by our liues ibid. V. W. Vanity how creatures subiect to it and why Chap 8 verse 20 Vnbeleefe a Mother and maine sinne reasons against it and why wee ought to beleeue God Ch 11 v. 20. Will of God ch 12 v. 2. Word of God see Scripture Workes good which bee and why to be done What required to a good worke ch 2 v. 6 ch 14. v 5 6. Works neither 〈◊〉 nor merit and why see Law Works to what ends they are to be done seeing they iustifie not ch 2 v 6. Z. Zeale what erroneus and wise ch 10 v 2. Zeale without knowledg ibid. Zeale ioyned with knowledge and of what thinges ibid. Zeale of the Iewes faultie sundry waies Ibid. Zeale of Papists blind and furious Ibid. Zeale rare in Protestants Ibid. Zealous why we ought to be and why we should take heede of blinde zeale Ibid. Also Ch 12 v 11. Errata Muse not courteous Reader that thou doost meete with these faultes for there would haue beene farre more if the great diligence of the Printer had not preuented it the blinde Coppy and wine owne ouer-sight were so bad Correct therefore with thy pen these heere noted ere thou beginne to reade and beare with the rest PAge 3. l. 25. read Reuocation p. 4. l. 12. r. it p. 8. l. 11 r. exordium p. 9 l. 34 r. his afore free and for after grace and in the mar r. the Gospel after of p. 21. l. 3. strike out which of it selfe and place it before could in l. 32. P. 22. l 16. r. gift p. 23. l. 19. r. few l. 22. r. meane ones p. 25. str the 9. and 10. lines wholy p 27. l 35. r. whom p 32. l. 28. r be p 43. l. 17. r. too high p 54. l. 6. r. 1 Iohn p 57. l 19. r with P 61 l 14. r by for on in p. 63. the lines 12 13 14 15. 16. must be ioyned to l. 6. p. 72 str out whole lines 7 8 9 10 p. 73. r. all matters after attribute P. 84 l. 18. r. these foure p. 89. l. 13. r. Antimisthia p 〈◊〉 l. 1. r. as in killing Abcl. p. 107. l 4. r. doth not p ibid. l 16. r. iudgement for Law l. 32. r. coactiue p 112. l. 19. r. of the 1 chap. p. 133. from the two last lines vnto the 14. l of p. 135. all belongs vnto the 6. Dial. p. 186. l. 31. r. righteous p. 189. l. 3. r. Ro. 12 2. p. 272. str lines 26 27. p. 277. l 26. r hencc p 284. l 8. 〈◊〉 hence p. 362. mar r. imputetur p. 366. l. 34. str actions p. 385. in mar r. habent p. 390. l. 17. r. frced p. 397. l. 1. str on t hauing a little paper left p. 409. l. 29. r. sick p. 428. l. 18. r. now p. 442. l. 7. r. and workes it is a good signe p. 〈◊〉 l. 1. r. word and 446. morg r. deplorat 451. l. 14. r. good p. 488. l. last r. truth p. 489. str 5 last lines p. 502. l. 15. r. after vnable by his-own vnthriftinesse p. 527. l. 15 〈◊〉 r. followeth and his merites p. 563. l. 19 20. r. to our spirit and with our spirit p. 596. l. 6. r. explication p. 606. l. 25. r. our error p. 6 〈◊〉 1. l. 34. r. 〈◊〉 p. p. 614. in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 628. l. 14. r. or some thing which hath Analogic and proportion with faith p. 650. for thirdly r. secondly l. 35. angels for diuels p. 652. l. 31. read probable onely p. 673. l. 1. r. Silas p. 679. mar r. vniuersum genus p. 693. l. 19. r. be iust p. 719. l. 30. r. having p. 〈◊〉 l. 3. r. 〈◊〉 p. 759. l. 11. r. ver 3 4. of this chap. p. 802. r. christ for faith p. 833. r. preaching p. 〈◊〉 l. 21. r. hath not done p. 848. r. are things pa. 860. l. 32 r. it is not true p. 862. l. 23. r. sub testo p. 865. r an agreement p. 882. l. 18. reade Antopistos p. 867. mar r. prophetarum p. 897. l. 13. r. anomia p. 976. r. one beleeuer page 979 l. 11. so the promise p. 991. l. 28. r. or for of p. 997. l. 31. for gods iudgement 〈◊〉 these are things p. 902. l. 1. r. as christ p. 925. l. 6. r toward the end p. 1016. l. 32. r. allow them p. 1023. l. 15. r. three p. 1041. l. 10. for but r. nor l. 12. r. canon p. 1042. mar str Orineus p. 1048. in mar r. one for euen and write after doc Fulke p. 1069. l. 5. r. correction pag. 1085. l. 27. r. vnprofitable 1090. l. 10. 〈◊〉 good lawes 1101. l. 13. r. acknowledge p. 1106. 〈◊〉 4. r. retchles p. 1113. l. 21. r. for 〈◊〉 l hy p. 1121. l. 1. r. also defended Peters abiuring after marriage p. 1126. l. 31. r. vices for duties Acts 9 1 2 3. Ro. 3 24 25 26. Paul was separate 1. to eternal life 2. to the knowledge of both to beleeue as a Christian. 3. to preach it as an A ostle Prou. 3. Psal. 119. 10. 11 c. Nouelty a note of error Antiquity of verity By Prophets here be ment such as preached to the people as Nathan thogh they did write no prophesie Scriptures Vse Foelix Holy Ends Vses of the Scripture This putteth a difference betweene the Gospell and Law Son of God Iesus Christ. Lord. Seed of Dauid Gal. 4 4. Iohn 1 14. Christ had his humainity from Dauid not his 〈◊〉 Ioh. 5 26. and 2 19. Eph 4 10 11 Acts 26 8. Rom. 4 17. Son of God Apostleship Ephel 3 8. 1. Cor. 15 8. It is a certain token of a faithfull Minister when he can account the profit of the hearers to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and vantage Paul his presence and preaching was fruitfull to other Gentiles and he wished and hoped it to be toward the Romaines Diuinity heer in excelleth Phylosophye which is not made for al men and the Law of Moyses giuen into one Nation only Acts 2 45 4 34. Habak 2 4. Papists must blame the Prophets and Apostles and
of the Law But neyther the one or the other be iustifyed by Workes both being sinners which touching the Gentiles is cleared in Ch. 2. and concerning the Iews in Ch. 3. ver 21. therefore Iustification of both is only by beliefe in Christ. Which conclusion is found Ch. 3. verse 22 c. Verse 1 2 3. Salutation 1 Paula Sernant of Iesus Christ called to bee an Apostle put apart to Preach the Gospel of God 2 Which he hath Promised afore by his Prophets in the Holy Scriptures 3 Concerning his Sonne Iesus Christ our Lorde which was made of the seed of Dauid according to the Flesh c. Tim. What things were noted in this Salutation Si. Three things first the person Saluting secondly the persons Saluted thirdly the thing which hee wished vnto them and prayed for Tim. What do ye note in the Person Saluting how is hee described Silas First his Office both by the perticuler that he was an Apostle or Ambassador and generall that he was a seruant of Iesus Christ that is a Minister or seruitor of Christ in publishing his will by preaching the Gospell and not onely a seruaunt as other Christians by common profession secondly by the Doctrine which he taught whereof he entereth into commendation Tim. Whence had he this Office Silas Not by men nor of men but immediately by the calling of Iesus Christ Acts 9 12 3 4. Tim. Wherefore doth he speake of his Calling Silas First in respect of false Apostles who charged him to be an intruder secondly to shew that he had authoritie to teach and that they were bound to obey because he brought a Diuine doctrine and did not offer to teach them by intrusion and vsurpation but by a iust lawfull and diuine vocation Tim. How came he by such a Calling from Christ Silas Not by his owne merits either foreseene or present as Origen thought but by the eternal decree of God who set him apart for that seruice of preaching the Doctrine of saluation as it is heere saide put apart to Preach to wit to the Gentiles Acts 23. which was both from the instant of his birth Gal. 2 15. at the time of his calling to the Apostleship and from euerlasting by an eternall election as Chrysostom and after Peter Martyr affirmeth From whence we learn that our Callings guists and fruits of them dependeth vpon Gods election that all flesh may be humbled before God ascribing to themselues none but all praise to God and free grace from euerie thing which is in them or done by them or to them Furthermore in that by the will and Councell of God his vocation was assigned for Paul and hee sanctified and put apart for it as Ieremy was Chap. 1. 5. long before any manifestation thereof to themselues or to the world let vs heereby be warned neither rashlie to rush into a calling running before wee be sent of God centrary to the practise of Aaron and Christ. Heb. 5. 4. nor beeing sent and called with-draw our selues from our appointed function least we be found to fight against God whiles we would appeare to men to bee shamefast For such an infirmity sake God was angrie with Moyses Exod. 3. and punished Ionas Chap. 1. Paul commended for the contrary vertue his readinesse to obey his calling gal 1. 16. 17. Also Iohn the Baptist. Iohn 1. 7. Tim. By what Arguments or Reasons is the Doctrine of the Gospell commended to vs in this place Silas First by the Effects It is a Doctrin of Ioy and Comfort for so much the word Gospell signifieth as ye would say a good spell or word of good tidings Luke 2. 10. Secondly by the Efficient cause It is reuealed from Heauen of God himselfe and teacheth the Grace of God therefore called the Gospell of God Thirdlie by the Antiquity it was first published and promised by the Prophets Gal. 3. 13. Fourthly by the Subiect and Matter which it handleth and that is the Sonne of God Incarnate and made Man also Sauiour and Redeemer for mans eternall Saluation Lastly by a proper End which is to engender the obedience of Faith in the Name of Christ Verse 5. Tim. What doth this admonish vs of Silas First of the neuer sufficiently loued and praised goodnesse of God who would commit to vs such a doctrine for Quality so comfortable for Authority so diuine for Continuance so ancient for Matter and subiect so very excellent and glorious Secondly of our owne duty towards this Doctrine of the Gospell Tim. What is our Christian duty towards the word of the Gospell Silas First in our Iudgements to approoue it and esteeme it aboue Pearles and most precious and profitable things Secondly in our minds to marke and heed it well Thirdly in our harts to beleeue it Fourthly in our affections to loue it and put our chiefe delight in it Fiftly in our memories to keepe it and treasure it Sixtly with our eares to hearken to it Seuenthly with our mouths to consesse it and speake good of it Lastly to submit our whole man to the obedience and practise of of it in all sincerity and constancy Tim. What other thing doth it admonish vs of Silas Of their error which charge it with nouelty or flexiblenesse according to the wils of men and circumstances of time for it is alwaies one and the same like God the Author and it is very ancient it is no vpstart Doctrine as ancient as mans fall and that is most true which was first as that is false which was latter Tim. What learne we by this that we haue that accomplished and most clearely manifested to vs which was onely promised to the people of the Iewes by the Prophets Silas That as God hath shewed forth towardes vs the more excellent Grace so our contempt and vnthankfulnesse if we endeuour not to walke worthy of that grace wil cost vs deare by pulling heauier Iudgements from Heauen vpon vs. Woe to thee Corazin Mat. 11. 21 c. Also learne that the Gospell promised to the Fathers by the Prophets and performed by Christ at his comming is one in substance Tim. What do ye call the Prophets Silas Men called of God to the Ministery of the old Church and furnished with speciall graces both for Interpreting the will of God set downe before by Moyses in his Bookes and also to foretell the will of God touching future euents and namely touching the exhibiting of the Messias and of the good things to be enioyed by his sufferings 1 Pet. 1 11. Tim. What doth this admonish vs of that the promises of Christ are hid in the Scriptures of the Prophets Silas That there is a great correspondency and agreement for truth and matter of Doctrine betweene the Old and the New Testament though great oddes in the measure of reuelation Hence it is said of one that the Old Testament is the hiding of the New and the New is the opening of the Old Tim. What should
saue sinners propounding life indeed but it is vnto the perfect keepers whereas the Gospell offereth and performeth Saluation to the beleeuer euen to euery beleeuer without difference of Nationê and so the promises of the Gospell are vniuersall both in respect of al beleeuers which receiue it and also because no Age Sex Nation Estate or condition is excluded from perticipation of Christ life eternall so they belieue Lastly in the tenth Chapter of this Epistle verse 13 14 15. Paul frameth the Ladder as I may so speake by which the Gospell causeth men to ascend and climbe vnto the marke of eternall Saluation in Heauen whereof the first steppe is sending of Teachers to preach the Gospell The second is preaching The third is hearing of the Gospell preached The fourth Faith by hearing The fift Confession and Inuocation of God The sixt and last is Saluation it selfe Tim. What reasons may moue men to beleeue Silas First the commandement of God Mark 1 15. Secondly the promises euen of eternal life and of all other good things bee made to Faith Thirdly examples of good men in Scripture who haue 〈◊〉 Fourthly the danger of vnbeliefe which is eternall death besides manifold temporary miseries Fiftly the profit of beleeuing Sixtly the truth of God the promiser who cannot lye or deceiue Seauenthly his almighty power being most able to keepe his promises Lastly we belieue men which are lesse faithfull then God by many thousand degrees and if we belieue the witnesse of men how much more ought we to receiue the testimony and record of God 1. Iohn 5 9. By these reasons we must fight against all motions of vnbeliefe and inforce our selues to vse all good meanes to preserue and increase Faith DIAL VIII Verse 17. For by it the righteousnesse of God is reuealed from Faith to Faith Tim. VVHat Coherence and dependance hath this Verse with the next before How are they knit together Silas It containeth a proofe or rendereth a reason of that which he had saide touching the Gospell by the proper effect whereof to wit that by Faith we should be Iustified he now confirmeth the Gospel to be The power of God to Saluation for wee are certainly saucd by that whereby we are Iustified This Text then dooth well and fitly serue to a double purpose and end First it is brought in as a reason of the definition of the Gospell set down in verse 16. For if by the Doctrine of the Gospell be plainly and effectually shewed and taught the onely right way of attaining righteousnesse before God which neither Law nor Philosophy nor anie other learning can teach then is the Gospell the mighty Instrument vsed of God to saue beleeuers Secondly it briefly putteth forth the whole state and proposition of the disputation following to the end of the 11. Chapter to wit That by Faith alone without Woorkes elect sinners be Iustified before the iudgement of God Which is proued by a testimony of Habakuk Tim. What is the sum of this Scripture Silas That the Gospell doth open the way howe to come vnto perfect righteousnesse such as shall make an Elect sinner stand vnblameable at the tribunal of God Tim. What is the drift Silas To proue that saluation is had by the Faith of the Gospell because perfect Iustice and saluation cannot bee diuided therefore from whence Iustice dooth come to vs from thence also eternall life in heauen doth proceed and flow Tim. What is heere meant by righteousnesse Silas The integrity of humaine Nature beeing conformed wholy to the will and Image of God this integrity is only to be found in Christ inherently and such as he will impute it vnto of fauour and mercy By the righteousnesse of God in this place we may neither vnderstand his essentiall righteousnesse whereby he is iust and righteous in himselfe louing Innocencie hating Iniquity Psal. 11 7. 45 7. nor yet his Distributiue Iudiciary righteousnesse whereby he rewards the Good and in seuerity of Iudgement is reuenged on the Wicked Rom. 1 23. 2. Thes. 1. 5. for these are not or can bee communicated to men by Faith neyther yet by Righteousnesse is meant that habite of Iustice and Charity infused of God into our minds whereby wee are made apt to do good-workes For this is manifested by the Law and stands in working not in beleeuing Rom. 3 20 21. But whither we vnderstand the perfect Iustice of Christ in his Nature actions and sufferings satisfying fully Gods wrath for sinne with the communicating application thereof to elect sinners by Faith or the Mercie grace and clemency of God declaring it selfe in freely pardoning sinners iustifying them also renewing their hearts withall that they may loue the Law abhorre vice Lastly giuing them pure and sincere actions and manners which be the necessary fruits companions of forgiuenesse of sinnes and imputed Iustice it skilleth not much For in many places the word Righteousnesse signifieth the goodnesse and mercy of God remitting sinnes and deliuering from the punnishment thereof for the merit of Christ as Psal. 31 2. and 35 4. 1. Sam. 12 7. and often elsewhere and may so bee taken heere Howbeit the best Interpretation is to expound it of the full obedience of Christ to death imputed to faithfull persons for remission of sinnes and perfect Iustice before God which is therefore called The Righteousnesse of God because it is his meere guifte and commeth not by workes or any humain strengths Rom. 9 30. Secondly it alone satisfieth the most rigorous exact Iustice of God and makes sinners iust not before men but in the sight of God Tim. Why is this Righteousnes called Righteousnes of God shew this more distinctly Silas First because it is his guift Secondly because he giueth it to shewe himselfe righteous and true of his word Thirdly it is that righteousnesse alone which he in his most strict and exact 〈◊〉 approoueth and will Crowne Lastly because his righteousnesse is opposite vnto the righteousnesse of Workes Rom. 10 3. Tim. How or in what manner respect is this Reuealed by the Gospell Silas First it is there contained taught and read of Secondly it is vnknowne to the Gontiles Thirdlie the prophesies of the Prophets do but obscurely shadow it and not plainly teach it as the gospell dooth Fourthly the gospell as an Instrument both openeth it and giueth it to vs which beleeue From whence we may learn that the gospell ought to be most precious vnto vs seeing we haue such a treasure by it and therefore al they are most wretched who either neglect or despise the gospell Tim. How may 〈◊〉 declare our precious reckoning which we do make of the Gospell Silas First by our continuall and hearty thankfulnesse to God for it Secondly by our study to know it soundly and distinctly Thirdly and chiefly by our beleefe practise of it Fourthly by our daily and earnest prayer to God for encrease in the knowledge and obedience of the gospell Tim. What
Nebuchadnezar when their captiuity was sharpe and their deliuerance long deferred yet because temporal deliuerance were Tipes of eternall and depended vpon Christ it is not to be doubted but Paul hath rightly applied it to the spirituall deliuerance by the Messiah to come through Faith Wherby the elect both vnder Law and Gospel were safe and made pertakers as well of Iustification and remission of sinnes presently as of life eternall in the Heauens Which concord in this great trueth of righteousnesse by Faith betweene the Prophets and Apostles it is implied not obscurely by this Particle As and whereas Paul ascribeth vnto holy Scripture the authority to proue the question in hand whether Faith or workes do iustifie before God we may note further in what estimation wee ought to haue the written word namely to account it the perfect rule of al diuine truth acording to which we ought to examine and iudge of al controuersies in matter of Faith and Religion for it is the wont of this blessed Apostle when he will confirme any Christian Doctrine or determine any doubt or question which may arise about it still to runne vnto Scriptures for probation which shewes the Scriptures alone to be a sufficient directory and a competent Iudge of all controuersies in Religion Tim. What did we obserue in the authority it selfe Sil. The reading and the Interpretation The reading standeth thus The iust by Faith shall liue this is the better reading or thus The iust shall liue by Faith this is the worse as though we were first iust and afterward should liue by Faith Also the word His is in the Prophet The iust shall liue by his owne Faith but it is left out by Paul because it is sufficient without the pronowne to proue his purpose that The iust by Faith shall liue Tim. What is the Interpretation of these words as they were first vsed of the Prophet Habakkuk Sil. To shew the duty of iust men in dangerous times namely by Faith to waite and rest vpon God if they would liue and be preserued when other which had confidence in themselues were destroyed Tim. What is the meaning as Paul sciteth it Sil. To teach thus much that such as imbrace righteousnesse by Faith shall be saued from Sinne Hell and Sathan and liue eternally in Heauen as well as be deliuered heere in earth from temporall dangers Tim. What Doctrines were gathered heere Sil. These three chiefely First that none shall liue but the iust Secondly none iust but by Faith Thirdly euery one is iustified by his owne Faith Tim. Why shall none liue saue the iust Sil. Because God hath not promised life but to such as are iust as it is written Doe this and liue Secondly he threatneth death to sinne and to all vnrighteousnesse therefore all vniust persons are certain to perish which sheweth the necessity of seeking and getting perfect iustice by beleeuing the gospell Tim. Why is none Iust saue by Faith Silas Because all men euen the best do lacke righteousnesse of their owne therefore they must seek it elswhere in Christ by Faith Rom. 10 3 4 5. Phil. 3 7 8 9. Tim. How is it declared that none is Iustified but by his owne Faith Silas As none seeth but with his owne eye or taketh hold of a thing but with his owne hand or eateth but with his owne mouth or walketh but with his owne feete so none seeth Christ to be his Sauiour or taketh hold of his merites or feedeth on him or walketh and commeth to him any otherwise then by his own Faith which is the eye hand and mouth of the soule Tim. What other things learned we from this Text Silas That we haue many notable benefites by Faith to wit Saluation Righteousnesse and Life who of all other be most principall Secondly that to liue by faith it is to exercise Patience Hope Wisedome Loue Obedience out of a liuely Faith by which a Christian is made able to mooue himselfe to all good duties vnto which by power of Nature wee can by no meanes attaine Tim. Is there any further thing to be obserued in this Text for our instruction Silas Yea it commendeth vnto vs the difference betweene the Law and the Gospell how the righteousnesse of the one is distinguished from the other For the righteousnesse of the Law requireth workes and the fulfilling of the Commandements Leuit. 18 5. Galath 3 12. But the Gospell saith The Iust by Faith shall liue The righteousnesse of the Law is a perfect obedience the righteousnesse of the Gospell is an imputation thereof to the Elect Sinner at what time he beleeueth Rom. 4 24. The Righteousnesse of the gospell God giueth to vs but the righteousnes of the Law men do giue it to God There is good vse of this difference and is to be held constantly because it freeth the trobled Conscience from snares and perplexities when hee shall perceiue that though he lacke good Workes and be full of wicked manners yet vnto the forgiuenesse of sinnes and absolution before God it is enough only to beleeue in Christ according to the gospel Secondly it takes from man al cause of reioycing and glorying in himselfe that he may glory only in this That he knowes God to be mercifull to pardon his sinne and accept him for righteous when by his sinfull Workes and transgressions of the Lawe hee deserued death Ier. 9 23. DIAL X. Verse 18. For the Wrath of God is reuealed from heauen against all vngodlinesse and vnrighteousnes of Men which with-hold the truth in vnrighteousnes Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Text how doth it depend vpon and sort with the former Verse Silas The drift and purpose is to confirm the maine and grand proposition that sinners are Iustified and saued by the Faith of the gospell The argument is from the contrary Sinners are not Iustified by their Works therefore by Faith For in the cause of Iustification faith and workes haue the condition of contraries Rom 11 6. Now touching things which be immediately contrarie the maxime and rule is that when the one is denied the other is affirmed and what is taken from the one is giuen to the other it doth then necessarily followe that righteousnesse must be had by Faith seeing it cannot be had by workes Aud why not by workes Was it not the common and generally receiued opinion both amongst Philosophers and the Iewes themselues that Workes were the cause of righteousnesse To this secret Obiection the Apostle answereth by a reason taken from the contrary effects as thus Men cannot bee righteous by their Workes because their workes were wicked and vniust therefore punished of God which he proueth by a distribution of Gentiles vnto Chap. 2. Verse 17. and thenceforward of the Iewes till Chap. 3. verse 22. Tim. How many things are noted in this Text Silas Three First that the Gentiles had knowledge of God and good things naturally ingrafted in them signified by the word Truth
iudiciary law is called iudgement or iustice because by the immutable order of iustice it is requisite that rewards and paines be repaied to men as recompence of their workes It is tearmed the iudgement of God because it doth not belong to God as a contingent effect of his free will which he may doe or not do as he will but as a naturall attribute is in God and by him vnchangeably expressed and executed 2. Thes. 1 6 7. Whereas the Gentiles are saide to know this iudgement the meaning is that they well vnderstood the law and iudgement of God to allot death to them which did such crimes and that vnto such crimes death did so firmely and necessarily cleaue by Gods iudgment as whether God did inflict or for some time spared yet the doers of such things were worthy of death that is some kind of punishment tending to destruction euen of Hels destruction the Gentiles were not altogether ignorant as by Virgil and other Poets may be collected This iustice of God the Heathens knew by light of Nature Secondly by witnesse of their owne Conscience and by experience in the daily examples of diuine reuenge Hence Draco appointed death to the breakers of his lawes and Gentiles iudged Adulterers vnto death Gen. 38 24. Also the Barbarians Acts 28 4 bewray murtherers worthy to dye in their iudgement Tim. What death are they worthy of which doe such things against the Law of God imprinted first in mans minde then written in Tables of Stone Silas Both naturall death violent death and death eternall this eternal death standeth in a separation from God and in a sense of paine-full torments in body and soule it is to be suffered in Hell a Prison a Lake a place of darkenesse a depth in the company of the Diuell wicked Angels and Reprobate men and for euer without end infinitely without measure Tim. How is this paine and smart of this death shaddowed out in Scripture Silas By the similitude of fire and Brimstone the effects of this paine be weeping howling and gnashing of teeth this paine shall endure as long as God endureth euen euerlastingly Tim. What vse is to be made of this description Sil. First it should humble vs much to think that we deserue such an vnhappy condition Secondly it should make vs flye from sinne that hath pulled it vpon vs. Thirdly it should stirre vp a loue to 〈◊〉 Christ that hath himselfe suffered the paines of this death to free vs from it Fourthly it should moue in vs great pittie towards such as do lye in sin and be in the Highway vnto this death Lastly it should breed great carefulnesse to keepe others from sinning Tim. What sinnes are chiefely to be auoyded of vs Christians Sil. Sinnes against our knowledge because they giue greatest wounds to our conscience and so most trouble the peace of our owne hearts Secondly they draw after them the greatest downefall in this world which is the sinne against the Holy-ghost Thirdly they procure greatest wrath and punishment after this life Lastly they haue in them slat contempt and Rebellion against God Tim. May not Gods Children sinne after their knowledge Sil. They may and do as appeareth by Dauids praier Psal. 19 13. and practise Psal. 51. Also by the example of Adam Manasses Solomon and Peter but in these sinnes the godly differ much from the wicked for the godly fall into these sinnes seldom with a strife of heart against them in the doing and great griefe of heart afterwards as also encrease of care and watchfulnesse against new temptation but none of these things bee in the wicked but the quite contrary for they run headlongly and wilfully into euill and are without remorse and returning to God Tim. What is it to fauour those that do euill Sil. To consent vnto their wicked deeds with approbation this may be done many waies as by praising by counselling and perswasions by hiring and rewarding by defending by dispensing by pardoning or procuring pardons by concealing and hiding and by pleading for them also by silence and not reproouing or not punishing all these worthy of death Tim. How may their fault bee set out which fauour euill doers Sil. By the example of Arch-rebels which wil maintaine all that rise vp against their Prince This is an high pitch and degree of sinne and in a very dangerous case they stand who be risen to this height of iniquity especially in this light of the Gospell CHAP. II. DIALOGVE I. Verse 1. ¶ Thou therefore art inexcusable O Man whatsoeuer thou art that iudgest for in that same wherein thou iudgest another thou condemnest thy selfe for thou that iudgest doest euen the selfe same things Tim. WHat is the purpose of this Text Silas The general purpose is to shew the guiltinesse of the Gentiles but especially to discouer reprooue a close kinde of sinners who tooke themselues to be righteous without fault because they reproued others and could not themselues be blamed of the world these sinners the Apostle telleth them that it is little helpe to them that the world cannot iudge them seeing they are iudged of their own Conscience and of God The text hath a reproofe in the first words Secondly a reason in the rest Tim. This indeed is the commonly receined opinion that the Apostle hauing in the latter end of the former Chapter reproued and conuicted open and bold offenders doth now in the beginning of this Chapter blame another kinde of trespassers amongst the Gentiles which were more polliticke and sinned with more cuning neither doing openly nor allowing such grosse crimes as were mentioned before but taxing and condemning them both morally by precepts as did Cato Socrates c. and ciutlly by their lawes as Solon Lycurgus Draco c. Yet in secret and priuately did the same things Some also there be which thinke that Paul hauing reprehended such as abused their contemplatine knowledge and contrary there vnto bad run into foule Idolatry against the first Table now taxeth such as abuse their practicke knowledge trespassing against their neighbours contrary to the knowne rules of common equity but what doe you thinke of the connexion of this Chapter with the former Sil. The first Particle of this Text Therefore doth well cleare it to me that this whole sentence is inferred and dependeth vpon the former words in the last verse of the precedent Chapter so as he doth not take vp a reprehension of a new sort of sinners but goeth on still to conuict the same transgrcssors but with a new 〈◊〉 Hitherto he hath reasoned from the effect of euill workes done by the Gentiles against God and men to wit the wrath and punishment of God reuealed and executed vpon them whereof it followeth strongly that the Heathen by their works deseruing damnation could not thereby challenge Iustification Heere he argueth and concludeth the same thing from a Testimony or iudgement of euery mans owne Conscience not from that particular morall iudgement
sinnes conuincing vs of it Tim. What vse heereof Silas Foure-fold First the summoning of the wicked to repentance Acts. 17 30. Secondly the confirming such in their duties as haue repented 2. Cor. 5 11. Thirdly it teacheth patience because there will at length vndoubtedly be an end when the good shall bee rewarded Lastly Charity towards our brethren Rom. 14 13. Tim. What was the next thing Silas That this day is vncertaine to vs when it will come as appeareth by the testimony of the Scripture as Math. 24 where the vncertainty of this day is set forth by these and such like similitudes as of a Theese in the night of trauaile falling vpon a woman of a housholder comming from a marriage God would haue this day vnknowne to vs to warne all to be watchfull that is to liue so carefully euery day as wee would doe vpon our iudgement day because euery day may be that day for ought we know Tim. What hindereth the comming of that day Silas Onely the accomplishment of the elect which may be done in a short space Tim. Shall not the Iewes be called first Silas So it verily seemeth Rom. 11 24 25 26 27. c. but they are part of the elect whose calling may speedily be performed and wrought Tim. Who is the Soueraigne Iudge Sil. God by whose authority the iudgement is to be held first because he alone seeth the secrets of men Secondly he alone can open the booke of the Conscience Thirdly he alone can raise the dead Lastly hee alone can execute the sentence all which should worke great feare of offending him and continual care of wel-doing 2. Cor. 5 7. Tim. But the Scripture saith of Christ that he shall iudge the world as he is man Acts 17 31. how then shall the Saints iudge 1. Cor 6 2. Silas Christ shall pronounce the sentence Mat. 25. but the Saints shall iudge as assistants to Christ and approuers of his sentence The consideration whereof should breed terror to the wicked that he whom they haue despised shall iudge them and matter of comfort to the beleeuers that their head and Sauiour shal be their Iudge Tim. What shall be iudged Sil. Secrets of men by which is meant all inward thoughts conceiued in the heart all hidden affections seated there and all outward deedes closely carried from the knowledge of the world and done in dark or remote places Tim. What should this teach Sil. To haue a great eie euen to our thoughts and affections that they bee such as shall agree with Gods will Secondly to doe nothing but that wee would haue all the world to know for God who seeth all and shall iudge all is greater then the world and will open all to the worlde Tim. Why is the iudgement a part of the Gospell Sil. First because it stirreth to repentance which belongeth to the gospell Secondly it teacheth charity and patience two parts of the gospell Thirdly it bringeth perfect deliuerance and redemption from all sin and misery which is the matter of the gospell or else the meaning may bee that Christ shall giue sentence according to the doctrine of the gospell already published Iohn 3. 16. 17. 36. DIAL XII Verse 17. Behold thou art a Iew and restest in the law and gloriest in God and knowest his will and tryest the things which differ in that thou art instructed by the law Sil. VVHat is the drift of this Text Sil. To conuince the Iewes as guilty of sinne and damnation as before hee had done by the Gentiles and so to driue them both to seeke their iustice not in their owne workes but in Christ Jesus alone Tim. What order doth the Apostle keepe in this part of his treatise Sil. Hee doth these three things First hee rehearseth seuen priuiledges or benefits of God towardes the Iewes to the chiefe whereof euen to their Doctors he directeth his speech Secondly hee reprooueth their vnthankfulnes in the abuse of these benefits Thirdly he answereth their obiection about circumcision and sheweth which is true circumcision and which bee true Iewes which bee otherwise Tim. What was the first benefit which they might pretend for their immunity why they should bee exempt from the seuere iudgement of God Sil. That they were called Iewes which was an honorable title and noble as now it is to bee called Christians but they were not such as they were and would be called which sheweth vs that trueth may be seuered from titles and that glorious names through the wickednesse of such as beare them may become most odious and infamous Tim. What was the second benefit Sil. That they had the law and the seruice of God prescribed them by it this benefit appeareth to bee great by Deut. 4. 7. 8. And Psal. 147. 19. 20. But their abuse about it was that they rested and contented themselues in the reading knowledge and profession of the lawe also putting their trust therein and proceeded not to practise and obedience to walke in the statutes which they vnderstood and professed Tim. What was the third benefit Sil. That the true God was their God and made a couenant to take them to be his people this was a maruailous great benefit the profession and dignity of the couenant as appeareth by Deut. 4. 29. and Psal. 144 15. And Paul sayeth it was their glory but this was their abuse of this benefit that they gloried in God without due desire and care to aduance his glory by godlines of liuing Tim. Tell vs what the fourth benefit is Sil. It is the knowledge of Gods will this appeareth to bee a precious benefit by these reasons First because knowledge is a part of Gods image and of Christes kingdome Secondly it is to the mind as the eie to the body or the Sun to the world Thirdly it is of great price more worth than all merchandize Prou 3. 14. Fourthly it maketh one man to excell another but heerein they abused their knowledge both for that knowing the will of GOD they did it not and also because being seuered from loue of God and their neighbour it made them swell Tim. What is the fift benefit Sil. Triall of thinges which differ these wordes they haue another reading as thus Thou allowest of things which are excellent If wee take the first reading then it hath this sence that the Iewes had such a degree of knowledge of Gods will at least in their own perswasion as they could discerne betweene good and euill betweene trueth and errours Phil. 1. 7. 8. But if wee take the second reading then the sence will be this that they by their knowledge not onely could tell what was good and what was not but of sundry duties they knew which was most excellent This is a benefit of great moment because in comparison of two duties when they come in ballance togither it is a very good thing to know which is to be preferred for one may commit a great sin in the doing of
as if hee should say Doest thou not blush to neglect thy selfe when thou directest others Tim. What is the matter of this Reprehension Sil. It is either generall or particular generally hee reproueth them for doing such faults as themselues blamed in others also for leauing vndone such duties as they did commend to others Tim. What is it to teach others not to teach our selues Silas To teach others is to giue others good instruction what to do and what to leaue vndone and not to teach our selues is not to follow the same instruction in our selues nor to be examples of our owne instructions and lessons Tim. How many sorts of men are reproued by this Sil. Three sorts First such as are meerely ignorant who know so little that they can neither teach themselues nor others Secondly such as for their knowledge can and do teach themselues but for lacke of vtterance they cannot instruct others This is a fault in some Pastors Thirdly such as haue skill to teach others and do it in a good measure but themselues for lacke of application haue no profit to amendment of their owne life this is the fault both of euil Pastors and euill professors and is the thing which is blamed in this text Tim. Is it not of these the Scripture saith that seeing they see not Sil. It is so indeed meant of such as haue knowledge to see what is good but lacke grace to make vse of it to themselues These men are great Hypocrites bee vnder fearfull iudgements Math. 13 14. Actes 28 27. they pull downe with one hand what they built vp with the other Tim. What is it that hee doth particularly reproous in the Iewes Silas The breach of the eight commandement which forbiddeth theft or stealing which euen their Priestes were guilty of Hos. 4 8. Math. 23 13. Tim. What do ye call Theft Sil. Theft in a proper speech or according to the common vse of the word is a secret conueying from other men their goodes without their knowledge or leaue Of this theft there are two kindes either it is of persons that is called man-stealing or of things Tim. What are the things that may be stolne Silas They are either holy prophane or common to steale holy things it is Sacriledge when things appointed to an holy vse are turned to a priuate vse Also the stealing of common or prophane things is either by taking away the goods of priuate men or else by robbing the common treasure Tim. Hath not theft yet a more large signification what is it Silas It hath so for theft importeth all wrong anie way done to others in that which by right is due vnto them yea all desire of other mens substance is theft when theft is thus taken many other sinnes will come vnder it as first all withholding from others things found or committed vnto our trust is theft Secondly when things borrowed are neuer paide againe or bee worse at the returning then when they are borrowed Thirdly thinges solde by false weights or measures Fourthly the vttering bad wares instead of good Fiftly the ouer-prizing of our Wares Sixtly the buying too cheape of such as are driuen to sell. Lastly all fraud and deceite in bargaining Moreouer to keepe backe Seruants wages and to faile of doing towards others that dutie which by our place we are bound to do as in Ministers Magistrates Maisters Seruants c. Tim. What do ye call Adultery Silas It is the vncleannesse betweene married persons when they forsake their owne bed This vncleannesse is onely named in the Law because it is the most common and most odious vncleannesse For the Holy ghost Pro. 6 30 31. doth detest it more thē theft as the greater sinne and maketh an Adulterer worse then a theefe Such were the sonnes of Ely 1 Sam. 2 22. those two false Prophets whom the King of Babel burnt and many Popish Monkes Friers and Priests which cry out in the Pulpit against vncleannes yet greedily cōmit it Tim. What do ye cal Idols Sil. Images either of false or of the true God euen all religious Images forbidden in the Law Tim. How may it appeare that it is vnlawfull to haue the Image of the true God Silas First the Law forbids it expresly Deu. 4 16. Secondly the Israelites made an Image of Iehouah and were punished Exod. 32 4 27. Thirdly it is a dishonor to God being immortal and inuisible to represent him by a visible and mortall thing as they diminish the maiesty so they depraue the worship of God Tim. What els was contained vnder Idols Silas Any thing whatsoeuer we loue and honour as God Thus money is an Idoll to the couetous pleasure to the Epicures honour to the ambitious Philip. 3 19. Col. 3 5. Tim. What call ye Sacriledge Sil. It is a sin committed about holy things or things appointed vnto an holy vse as one would say a sacred theft because things giuen to superstitious vses ought by the Magistrate to be abolished after the example of Iosiah Tim. What do ye call holy Vses Sil. Such as any way belong vnto the Seruice of the true God as Churches Tithes Communion Table and Cup Pulpit cloath Lands Bookes and such like the Priests which by couetousnesse spoiled the Oblations were culpable of Sacriledge Tim. When is Sacriledge committed about these holye things Sil. Either when publicke persons for priuate lucre do conuert these thinges to their owne vses or when priuate persons without publicke authority do violate them by applying them to their vse This sacriligeous sinne is worse then theft for Sacriledge is as it were a robbing of God and a spoyling of him as Malachy in his first chapter speaketh Tim. By what other way may we perceiue the heynousnesse of this sinne Silas By considering the iudgements of God vpon such as were guilty of it Examples we haue in Achan who stole holy things and was stoned Iosh. 7 1. Ely his sonnes for Sacriledge both killed in one day 1 Sam. 3 13. Ananias and Saphirah for this sinne were both suddenly stroken dead Tim. What other things were taught heere Silas That it is a marke of an Hypocrite to abstaine from some grosse sinnes and yet to liue in other sinnes as foule Secondly to do the same thinges which commonly he reproueth in others Thirdly note that Paul ioyneth Idolatry and Sacriledge not as opposites but as things neere of kinne For euery Idolater is a sacrilegious person for hee doth enormously prophane the holinesse of God and wickedly pollute his sacred worship and rob him of his due honour DIAL XV. Verse 23 24. Thou which gloriest in the Law by breaking the Law doest thou dishonour God As it is written The name of God is euill spoken of amongest the Gentiles Or blasphemed thorough you Tim. WHat is the Sum of this Text Silas To shew that the Iewes are not righteous by their workes seeing their workes were such as did dishonour God Secondly the co
turned ouer to the Iustice of God For if men once come to this passe to bee cauillers against the knowne truth there is little hope of them their iudgement is peruerted and their heart filled with pride and obstinacy therefore to be auoided as Dogs or Swine DIAL VI. Verse 9 10. What then are we better then they No in no wise For wee haue before accused both Iew and Gentile that they are all vnder sinne as it is written There is none righteous no not one Tim. WHat is the drift of this Text Silas To prooue all men whether Iew or Gentile to bee alike sinners by the testimony of Scripture The words haue first an Obiection in the person of the Iewes Secondly the answer of Paul which takes from them occasion of glorying too much in their Auncestors Tim. What learne wee heereby that Paul putteth himselfe in the same ranke of sinners Silas The wisedome that ought to bee in Teachers by all meanes to mollifie their reprehension of sinners and namely by taking in themselues when they may do it with truth Secondly that there is amongst men a communion or incorporation of sinne Tim. Is not this contrary to the first verse where he saith the Iewes were better then the Gentiles And now he makes them both equall Iew no better then Gentile Tim. No for there he meaneth that the Iewes were better in respect of God and his benefits vppon them heere he maketh them equall in respect of naturall corruption beeing alike sinners by nature the Iewes had a preferment of fauour to be Gods peculiar people to haue his Law and Prophets but concerning their manner of iustification before God by faith not by works it was all one to Iew and Gentiles all being sinners Tim. What did he meane by all being vnder sinne Silas That all men are vnder the guilt and punishment of sinne which is a matter of such daunger as it were better to haue the whole weight of the world vpon vs then to bee vnder the burden of one sin because the wrath of God which is the heauiest thing in all the world doth hang and lye vpon sinne and sinners for euer Vnder which condition all men without exception that are but meere men do lye Iohn 1 8. Tim. Whereof doth this admonish vs Sil. First of the miserable condition of al mankinde through sinne Secondly it stirreth vp our mindes to thinke vpon and looke after a Sauiour Thirdly it doth teach vs to reproue others with compassion considering our selues be sinners and in the same case and condemnation Gal. 6 1. Tim. How doth he proue the guilt and condemnation of all men Silas By authority of Scripture Psal. 14 3. Tim. What learne wee from this Silas That al Diuine truth must be proued by Scripture because the Conscience is not perswaded of anie sauing truth till it heare God speake who now doeth not speake to vs but in his word onely Secondly hee speaketh to his Church in Scripture onely and his voice alone is sufficient to perswade all truth For the word of God is perfect Psal. 19 7. Tim. From what Scripture doth he fetch his first Authoritie Sil. From Psal. 14 3. There is none rigtheous no not one In these words all men be comprehended as it appeareth by the vniuersall particle None Also by doubling the deniall No not one That is none at all one or other Tim. But were not Adam and the Man Christ righteous Silas They were so but Christ was more then a man and Adam was righteous before his fall This sentence must be vnderstood of meere men such as they be since the fall of Adam as for Dauid Iob Zachary with other righteous men they are indeede called righteous but it was with vnperfect righteousnesse inherent or imputed to their Faith or by comparison as in Genesis 6 9. Tim. What is meant heere then by righteousnesse Silas One that is perfectly conformed to the will of God in all his thoughts wordes and workes without any fault or defect Of this sort of men there is not one to be found in all the stocke of Adam The reason is because al men are conceiued in sinne and after their new birth they haue sinne still dwelling in them Rom. 7 verse 14 15 16 17 18 c. Tim. But it is only mens actions that are not righteous the persons of the elect are alwayes righteous Silas This Text speaketh of persons no man again if persons bee righteous then the actions are not nor cannot be vnrighteous Tim. What followes of this Silas That all haue neede of the righteousnesse of Christ apprehended by faith that they may stande iust before Gods tribunall seate seeing all and euerie one be in their owne persons destitute of righteousnes nay full of vnrighteousnesse DIAL VII Verse 11 12. There is none that vnderstandeth there is none that seeketh God they are all gone out of the way they haue been made altogether vnprofitable there is none that doth good no not one Tim. VVHat is the drift of these Scriptures Silas To condemne all mankinde of sinne and therefore voyde of true righteousnesse wanting Christ who alone is the iustice of sinners Tim. Wherein doth the corruption of sinne appeare Silas First in the vnderstanding by ignorance Secondly in the affection by frowardnesse Thirdly in the actions by doing euill and leauing good vndone Or thus he accuseth the Iewes first of iniustice Secondly of blindnesse Thirdly of falling away Fourthly of deceite Fiftly of cursing Sixtly of cruelty Seuenthly of discord Eightly of prophanenesse Tim. Why doth hee say That all men are without vnderstanding Silas Because all men naturally doe lacke the true knowledge of God to Saluation euen as blinde men who for lack of eies see hot the Sunne though it shine neuer so bright and note that Paul setteth downe by negation what the Psalmist spake affirmatiuely keeping the sence though not the words by his Apostolike authority Tim. What was obserued here Sil. The pollicy of Sathan doing to all men as the Rauens do to the Lambs whose eies they first pick out when they will deuoure them Secondly the misery of man being in his most noble part that is his vnderstanding wounded and spoyled so as he perceiueth not the thinges of God nor can do 1 Cor. 3 14. Tim. Why doth he begin with the vnderstanding Sil. Because on this dependeth the whole life which cannot bee but euill when the minde is naught for ignorance is the mother both of errour Yee erre not knowing the Scriptures and of prophanenesse as it is written Ephe. 4 18. Tim. What learne wee from hence Sil. First to be humbled for our ignorance Secondly to pitty others that remaine still in ignorance being ready to instruct them and to pray for opening their eies Thirdly to thanke God for sound knowledge if wee haue any Fourthly to pray to God for an vnderstanding heart for wee haue it not by naturall instinct Tim. Why doeth he
because he is so man as he is God also Thirdly because he is appointed to bee the person that should reconcile mankind Iohn 6 26. Tim. Why is it added By his blood Sil. This may bee ioyned either with faith to shew whereunto it leaneth namely to Christ crucified or ynto atonement because the propitiatory was sprinkled with blood by the High-priest when he entred into the holy place to teach that without blood is no remission of sin but whereas Paul doth onely mention his bloud thereby he would signifie the whole entire passion of Christ by a 〈◊〉 Bloud a part being put for the whole Sacrifice of Christ which was the consummation of his obedience Tim. What doth this put vs in minde of Silas First of the fiercenesse of Gods wrath and his wonderfull Iustice against sinne in that he could not be satisfied but by the bloud of his onely sonne Secondly of Christs aboundant loue to vs and what loue we owe to him againe Thirdly it giueth much comfort vnto great sinners being afflicted in soule and humbled that such an vnvaluable price was laide downe for their sins Lastly it sheweth that the fauor of God is of very great worth more then all the world seeing it could not bee purchased but by a price greater then the world Tim. But what means haue we to apply the bloud of Christ to vs Silas Onely by faith by the power whereof wee vnderstand and beleeue that blood to be shed for vs vnto our full attonement with God And note that there be two meanes or Instruments of our redemption First without vs on Christ his part which is his death or bloodshed Secondly within vs on our part Faith DIAL XV. Verse 25 26. To declare the righteousnesse of God by the forgiuenesse of the sinnes that are Dassed through the patience of God Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Text Silas To expresse the cause or end for which God doth iustifie elect sinners which is the manifestation of his righteousnesse patience to the glory of his name Tim. What is heere meant by righteousnesse Sil. The truth and fidelity of God in sending his son according to his promise to worke the work of our redemption Secondly the Iustice of God in inflicting the whole punishment of sinne vpon the person of his Sonne Thirdly the mercy of God in smiting his Sonne that he might spare vs. We may vnderstand it of that which before was called the righteousnesse of Faith which God hath manifested to be the true iustice wherby men are iust before him Silas What learne we from this Tim. Seeing that God in reconciling the world vnto him by his Sonne did secke his owne glorie that is the marke which we our selues are to ayme at in seeking our saluation not seeking so much to be saued which may come of selfe-loue as that in our saluation God may haue his glory Tim. May not this bee vnderstoode of the righteousnesse which Christ wrought in his Man-hoode Sil. True it may be called the righteousnesse of God because the person was God which wrought it that is the onely righteousnesse which God doth allow and by which wee are acceptable For when this righteousnesse of Christ is giuen vs euen in our Iustification both sins past present and to come are forgiuen vs. Tim. Why doth he say then by forgiuenesse of sinnes passed Silas Some do vnderstand it of sinnes done vnder the old Testament but it is of others otherwise interpreted offinnes already committed because forgiuenesse is properly of sinnes past which men haue formerly done But the former interpretation seemeth to bee the best because of that which followes at this time present So then the meaning is this that as well the sins done before Christes comming in the flesh as those done since his first comming are forgiuen Gods Children which beleeue Tim. What was the vse of this Sil. To teach vs that the merit of Christs death looketh backwards and not onely forwards to them beleeuers that liued in the world before his passion aswell as to them that liued after his death and so he is the Lambe slaine from the beginning of the world For from the fall of Adam no forgiuenesse of sinnes to any but thorough Christ beleeued on Tim. Why is this added Through the patience of God Sil. Because he would shew that God doth bear with those sinners whom he will forgiue Tim. What is the patience of God Silas It is that propertie whereby hee suffereth them long exercising it towards the Reprobate in taking frō them all excuse and towards the godly in giuing them space of repentance Tim. What may we learne from hence Silas First to vse patience towards such as do offend vs that we may be like vnto God Secondly not to 〈◊〉 though God doth verie often for beare offenders because they may be such as God meaneth to forgiue and eternally saue to his owne praise DIAL XVI Verse 26 27. To shew at this time his righteousnes that he might be iust a Iustifier of him which is of the Earth of Iosus Where is then the reioycing It is excluded By what Lawe Of workes Nay but by the Law of Faith Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Text Silas To set foorth now fully the finall cause or true end for which God sheweth mercy to sinners for the pardoning of their sinnes which was to declare his righteousnesse Tim. What is meant by this time Silas That time when the Apostles liued and preached the Gospell and so forwardes to the end of the world neither the sinnes of former times nor of times present or future are forgiuen any other way then by faith in Iesus Christ. Tim. What learne ye by this Silas That there is but one way for forgiuenesse of sinnes to all men which liued before and since Christ euen by faith in him Therefore the Religion not of Papists but of Protestants is the ancient true religion Tim. That he might be iust what is that to say Sil. That is to say that hee might bee manifest and known vnto vs to be iust as he is in himselfe God doth shew himselfe to be iust vnto vs-ward two wayes First by punishing our sinnes seuerely in the person of his Sonne Secondly in pardoning them mercifully vnto vs which beleeue for his promise sake For as God is iust in himselfe so this Iustice is communicated to vs thorough faith in Christ. Tim. How is God called a Iustifier Silas Because he it was which gaue his Sonne as also which offered him and who doth impute him with his obedience for righteousnesse vnto the beleeuers which be of the faith of Iesus that is to say whosoeuer hec is that by faith embraceth Iesus Tim. Why is faith required in them who are to bee iustified by Christ Sil. That men may be shut out from any matter of reioycing in themselues For if righteousnesse came by our workes wholly or in part then wee shoulde haue
he had done but through Faith in Christ and also the Gentile lacking that Law yet by faith laying hold on Christ was admitted to the Couenant to be one of Gods people to haue God his God to giue him righteousnesse thence it followes that Iustification is not by workes but by Faith both to Iew and Gentile Tim. What instruction can ye gather from hence Sil. Euen this that Christ Iesus through faith ioyneth vs in fellowship with God of what Countrey soeuer we be Or this that as there is but one God who is a comm on Sauiour of all his people so but one way for his people be they Iewes or Gentiles whereby to bee Iustified and that is by faith in Christ. Tim. What words do follow Silas In the verse 31. it is written Do we then make the Law of none effect thorow faith c. Tim. What is the drift of these words Silas To answere the obiection of such as were enemies to iustification by faith and secretly to confirme his purpose by that which is brought against him Tim. What is the Obiection Silas If such as beleeue in Christ be iustified without respect to their doing the workes of the Law then the Law is made voide and of none effect This obiection proceedeth from the ignorance of such as do not know the strength of sinne the Nature of Gods Iustice the true end wherefore the Law was giuen Secondly it proceedeth from the pride of nature loath to yeelde to this truth which so abaseth man and honoureth God Tim. What followeth of this Silas That the truth hath no greater enemies then proud ignorance or ignorant pride that dare lift vp it selfe Gyant-like against God himselfe Tim. What was the answere to this obiection Silas It hath two parts First a deniall with a detestation of the thing obiected God forbid Secondly an inuersion or conuerting the matter vppon the head of the obiectors Yea wee establish the Law Tim. What learne wee from the first part of the answer Sil. That all thoughts and reasonings against Gods truth should be very detestable to vs so as wee should reiect them with a meruailous hating of them For Diuine truth is such an holy thing so precious to God as we should not with patience endure anie muttering against it Tim. Whom doth this reproue Silas Such as do fauour or wink at cauils and cauillers against the Doctrine of saluation or such as are no whit moued at their dealing Tim. How doth the Apostle turne the thing obiected vpon their owne heads Silas Thus Iustification by faith is so farre from destroying the law as that the law is thereby established Tim. But how is this true which the Apostle sayth That the Law is established by faith Silas First the doctrine of iustification teacheth that Christ fulfilled the Law in his life Secondly that he suffered in his death the full punishment due to the breach of the law for all them who are iustified by him Thirdly that such as beleeue in him must endeuour the keeping of the Law to declare their thankefulnesse Thus is the Law established by this Doctrine of righteousnes thorow beleeuing Tim. What followes of this Silas That there is no cause either for the Iew to cast off the Doctrine of faith in regard of any wrong done to the Lawe which is thereby ratified and made more firme or yet for the beleeuing Gentile lesse to esteeme the Law because without it hee is iustified by Faith sithence thus the Law is the more countenanced confirmed as that which sheweth sinne our sickenesse and driueth to Christ and teacheth the good way wherein we are to walke that we may please Christ our iustifier CHAP. IIII. DIALOGVE I. Verse 1 2. What shall we say then that Abraham our Father hath found concerning the flesh For if Abraham our Father were Iustified by Workes hee hath whereof to reioyce but not with God Timotheus WHat is the drift of this whole Chapter Si. To proue Iustification to be by Faith by a new reason fetched from the example of Abraham Tim. How stands the frame of his reason Silas Thus Abraham as the Father of the faithful is the patterne of Iustification to all his seede or Children as verse 23 24. Looke how Abraham was in such wise be his seede iustified Now it is certaine that Abraham was iustified not by workes but by beleeuing the promise concerning Christ therefore all the Children of Abraham are so iustified Tim. What be the parts of this 4. Chapter Sil. Two in the first the example of Abraham is propounded vnto the 23. verse in the second this example is applied vnto the end of the Chapter Tim. How was the example propounded Sil. First negatiuely shewing how he was not iustified Secondly affirmatiuely shewing how he was iustified Tim. How was he not iustified Sil. He was not iustified by workes which the Apostle doth proue by this reason Abraham had nothing to glory with God but if he were iustified by works then hee had whereof to reioyce with God therefore not by workes Tim. But did his workes gaine him nothing Silas Yea amongst men and in the account of the world but not in Gods eye Tim. Why doth he call Abraham Father Sil. Because of him came the Iewes which were his Off-spring Tim. Why doth he call him Our father Sil. Because Paul himselfe was a Iew and descended of Abraham which he doth acknowledge to this end to decline the enuie of his Countrymen least they shold thinke he had not regarded Abraham Tim. Why is the example of Abraham chosen rather then of others Sil. Because he was of most reputation with the Iews also the Scripture had expressely testified of him that he had his righteousnesse by beleeuing Tim. What Instruction do ye gather from hence Sil. That it is a good kinde of teaching to teach by examples because those moue the senses Secondly of examples the fittest and most meete would be chosen which is a point of wisedome in the teacher Tim What is heere meant by flesh Silas The externall workes of Abraham as it is expounded in the next verse For if Abraham were iustified by Workes c. Tim. What do ye learne from the next verse Sil. Two thinges First good workes get vs commendations and matter of reioycing amongst men Secondly they doe not at all auaile vs to procure our acceptance pardon and release with GOD because they want perfection For neyther doe wee all good workes nor with all our heart neither do we continue so all our life long because before our time of calling we cannot do a good worke no more then a thistle can bring forth a Figge neither yet be such workes as wee do after our conuersion without spots Lastly wee do many things contrary to the Law DIAL II. Verse 3. For what saith the Scripture Abraham beleeued God and it was counted to him for righteousnesse Tim. VVHat doth this Text teach vs Silas How Abraham was
iustified namely by beleeuing the promise This is proued by authoritie of Scripture the Scripture saith that Abraham was iustified by beleeuing therefore he was so iustified The text hath a Question For what c. Secondly an answer thereunto Abraham beleeued c. Tim. What learne we from the Question Sil. That the points of Religion are to be proued by Scripture Secondly from authority of Scripture an argument followeth affirmatiuely Thirdly that proofes of Scripture ought to bee brought fitly and sparingly Fourthly the wisedome of Paul in obseruing the phrase and course of Scripture Tim. Now let vs come to the answere the faith spoken of in Gen. 15 6. which the Apostle heere citeth was not meant of Christ but of an infinite posterity andissue Silas The answere heereunto is this First Abraham by Faith had chiefe respect to that which was promised in the beginning of the Chapter that God would bee his shield and reward Secondly Abraham in his posterity foresaw Christ who was to come out of his loines Thirdly in all promises the promise offering Christ was wrapt as the foundation and roote of them all Fourthly it was Christ which spake to him at that time Gen. 15 6. for it was the second person who spake vnto the Fathers and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 beleeued in Christ. 〈◊〉 the mercy of GOD whether it appeareth to vs spiritually or temporally is the obiect of faith and God is not mercifull but by Ielus Christ therefore they that beleeue any promise of mercy beleeue in Christ. Tim. What more doe ye obserue here Sil. To beleeue God and to beleeue in God are all one for to beleeue God is to giue credite to his word and to put our confidence in his goodnes thus Abraham beleeued God Tim. What more was learned hence Sil. That it is a wonderfull thing to beleeue God or in God because it obtaineth the praise of righteousnesse to him that doth it as it is written He beleeued God and it was accounted to him for righteousnesse This one thing should be sufficient to moue all Christians to rely vppon God his promise by faith Tim. What other reasons may moue men to beleeue God Sil. Very many and substantiall as first because of Gods commandement Secondly because God being most true is worthy to be beleeued Thirdly there is great danger if wee doe not beleeue euen eternall death and the losse of heauen besides all temporall goods Fourthly it is a speciall seruice of God to trust in him Fiftly it is the cause of all other duties which spring from faith as the roote of all Sixtly therein is God most honored when he is trasted in and by the contrary much dishonoured for hee is thereby made a liar so much as lyeth in vs. 1 Iohn 4. 20. DIAL II. Verses 4. 5. Now to him that worketh the wages is not counted by fauour but by debt but to him that worketh not but beleeues in him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is counted for rightenesse Tim. VVHat is the drift of this text Sil. To proue iustification came not by woorkes but of faith by an argument of contraries three contraries set against three as first he that worketh not and hee that worketh The second contrariety is betweene fauour and debt the third is wages and imputation Tim. How stands Paules argument from these contraries Sil. Thus if Abraham were iustified by merit of works then he had his righteousnesse by debt and as a wages but his righteousnesse came to him not of wages and debt but of fauour and by imputation therefore hee was iustified not by workes but by faith Or more briefly thus If Abraham was iustified by fauour and imputation therefore not by desert of works but by beleeuing Tim. What is meant by him that worketh Sil. Not one that hath or doth works but one that desireth to deserue by his workes which appeareth by this First a beleeuer must be a worker and such an one was beleeuing Abraham Secondly wages and debt is giuen to merit not to works Tim. What learne wee by this that the reward is counted according to debt to him that will clayme it by merite of workes Sil. That eternall life is due to him that can fulfill the law this commeth by vertue of a compact or couenant which God hath made promising to them which doe the law that they shall liue by their works Tim. What is meant by him that worketh not Sil. Such an one as either hath no workes to commend him to God and deserue his fauour or hauing workes do put no affiance nor trust in them Tim. What was the doctrine here Sil. That wee must claime nothing by our workes the reason hereof is first because our good workes are ioyned with many euils Secondly our workes be not our owne Thirdly there is no proportion betweene our workes and the kingdome of heauen Fourthly our workes are a due debt Fiftly our best workes haue their imperfections and wants that we do not all good workes neyther do we them in perfect loue of God and our neighbour Tim. What is it to beleeue in him that iustifieth the vngodly Sil. To put trust in him that he will bee mercifull to our sinnes to forgiue them to vs for Christ. Tim. Who are the vngodly Tim. Such sinners as be straungers from God as all the elect be before their calling Tim. Doth God accept wicked men to fauour while they are wicked Sil. No but first hee forgiueth their sinnes And secondly of wicked hee maketh them good putting his holy spirit into them to regenerate and sanctifie them But at their iustification he findeth them vngodlie and maketh thē godly and he doth it both by taking away the guilt of all their sins by free pardon also by cleansing away the filthinesse of sinne by a powerfull sanctification Tim. What is meant heereby That his Faith is counted to him for righteousnesse Silas That the righteousnesse of Christ is reckoned the righteousnesse of that person which doth by Faith embrace Christ. DIAL IIII. Verse 6 7 8. Euen as Dauid described the blessednes of the man vnto whom God imputeth righteousnesse without workes saying Blessed are they whose vnrighteousnes is forgiuen whose sin is couered Blessed is that man to whom c. Tim. VVHat is the drift of this text To proue that righteousnes is imputed vnto faith and commeth not by Workes The which the Apostle prooueth by the testimony of Dauid Psal. 32 1 2. Tim. What be the parts of this Text Sil. 2. First the Preface or entrance Euen as Dauid c. Secondly the testimony it self Blessed are they c. Tim. What note ye out of the Preface Sil. These thinges First that the testimony is cited without naming the Psalme or verse Secondly that the righteousnesse of Christ was preached to them that liued before Christ. Thirdly Paul so citeth the testimony as hee giueth the summe and meaning of it in few words which is thus much that Iustificatō is the
of God to admonish vs by mysticall signification and seales to assure vs of Christ and our righteousnes by him Euery signe is not a seale but circumcision is both and DIALOGVE VI. Verse 11 12. That he should be the Father of them that beleeue not being Circumcised that righteousnesse might be imputed to them also and the Father of Circumcision not to them onely which are of the circumcision but vnto them also which walk in the steps of the faith of our Father Abraham which hee had when he was vncircumcised Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Text Silas To shew the end of Gods counsell in iustifying Abraham in time of his vncircumcision which was to shew that the Gentiles which beleeue are Abrahams children though they be vncircumcised aswell as the circumcised beleeuing Iewes To explaine this better in the former verses two thinges were affirmed of Abraham First that he was iustified by the faith he had in his vncircumcision 2. that hee receiued circumcision as a seale of forgiuenesse of sinnes by the redemption of Christ thorough faith in his blood Now he sheweth the cause of each and that each had his mystery For the former was so done that he might be the Father of such as beleeue being not circumcised i. Gentiles the latter hapned that he might be the Father also of Circumcision i. the Iewes not vniuersally but particularly such as walked in the steps of Abrahams faith and all to this end to teach that the benefit of imputed righteousnesse pertaineth to both Iewes and Gentiles which are beleeuers as being equally children of Abraham and therefore heires of all the priuiledges and rightes which were Abrahams by vertue of Gods promise that he made to him Gen. 17. I will bee thy God and the God of thy seede And againe Thou shalt be the Father of many Nations Abraham c. in this name was this whole mystery expressed Concerning the interpretation of the wordes this phrase of walking in the steps of the faith c. hath reference as may seeme vnto the commaundement Genesis 17 1. Walke before me c. and it doth verie significantly declare that there is no other Faith required in the posterity then which was in the Parent Abraham namely such a faith as seeks remission of sins and life euerlasting in grace alone and not in Circumcision and workes of the Law Tim. Of how many sorts be the Children of Abraham Silas They be either Iewes or Gentiles The Iewes may bee distinguished into circumcised and beleeuing Iewes and vncircumcised and beleeuing as Abraham did but not circumcised as he was as they were which receyued the Gospell when the law ceased Tim. What is it then that giueth this dignity to men to be Abrahams Children Silas It is not Circumcision but Faith beleeuing the promises after Abrahams example for it causeth righteousnesse to be imputed to them yea though they lack Circumcision Tim. What things are learned from hence Sil. That it was a great honour which God did vnto Abraham to make all beleeuers his Children First because it is a large and honourable posterity Secondly it is also a maruellous great matter to haue Abraham to be our father For righteousnesse forgiuenesse of sinne all happinesse belongeth to such We are heere verie diligently to obserue least we erre that father-hoode in respect of the faithful is heere giuen to Abraham not by efficiencie as if he should be the worker and authour of faith in all his children for faith is the guift of God it is not of our selues or of any other creature but by a kind of proportion because the grace of the Couenant was giuen him vpon that condition and agreement and by that Lawe that as carnall parents do passe ouer and deriue all their inheritances and goods vnto their naturall Children so Abraham this spirituall Father should by couenant doctrine and example deriue vnto all the faithfull his spirituall Children that free blessednesse and Iustice of Faith which hee had receiued of God Learne also the vnity and harmony of the Church Faith righteousnesse in the olde and new Testaments There is but one Father of all the beleeuers and therefore but one faith one body and one Church one Lord head and Sauiour one Iustification one saluation euen as we professe one catholick Church the Communion of Saints to which pertaines remission of sins resurrection and glory Hence fals to ground that carnall conceite of the Iewish Church that it had onely temporall promises and were not partakers of Christ and his righteousnes Furthermore note here that to be the children of Abraham and heires of his Iustice wee ought to labour for such a faith in all points as was his Faith so qualified as his beleefe was comming after him in beleeuing as we would tracke and followe the steps of one which had gone before vs in a rough vneuen and cragged way Tim. What were the qualities of Abrahams faith in which we must imitate him Sil. Sundry and excellent First readinesse in that he beleeued God without delay or deliberation after once he had his promise and vnderstood it Secondly sincerity in that he beleeued truly without Hypocrisie Thirdly strength for that he stroue against and ouercame all lets of his faith Fourthly patience in that hee waited long for the performance of the promise Fiftly constancy in that he continued to beleeue vnto the end 6. Wisedom in that he grounded his faith aright vpon the word and promise of God and not vppon men or his owne merites Seauenthly fruitfulnesse for his faith was fruitfull of good workes Iames 2 22. Abrahams Faith wrought with his workes Lastly it was not coniectural opinion but a Plerophory or firme and full assurance of the promise Rom. 4. Tim. What were the chiefe fruits of Abrahams faith Sil. First singular loue of God for whose sake hee was ready to offer Isaac Secondly a true feare of God Thirdly rare charity towards men gladly entertaining strangers Fourthly deniall of him selfe for he left his owne countrey and his fathers house Fiftly sortitude and valorous courage for hee feared greatly no danger nor enemy Sixtly contempt of the worlde with the pleasures and delightes profits and honours of it for hee was euer ready to loose and leaue all for Gods name Such as bee like to Abraham in his faith hauing or striuing to haue it so qualified and so fruitfull are indeed the children of Abraham DIAL VII Verse 13. For the promise that he should be the heyre of the world was not to Abraham or to his seede through the law but through the righteousnes of faith Tim. VVHat is the scope and drift of this text what is the purpose of Paul Sil. To prooue by a newe reason that Abraham had righteousnes not by his workes but by his faith the reason is this By what meanes Abraham was heire of eternall life by the same meanes he obtained righteousness but Abraham was heire of eternal life by beleeuing
obserue in the vnlikenesse or dissimilitude in verse 15 Silas These two things First the vnlikenesse set downe plainely that the sinne is not as the gift Secondly that wherein it doth consist for if through the offence of that one c. Tim. What is 〈◊〉 heere by gift But yet the gift is not so Silas The righteousnes or perfect obedience of Christ in keeping the Law nowe this is tearmed a guift to teach vs that it is free and becommeth ours not by desert of workes or dignity of person but because it is giuen vs of mercie euen contrarie to the merite of our deeds Tim. What is meant by offence Silas It is as much as fall and is put heere for sinne Adams sinne was his fall Tim. What learne ye heereby that sinne and fall are knit together Sil. How dangerous a thing sinne is which bringeth with it a fall euen as deepe and perilous as from heauen to hell from the heighth and top of all happinesse to the lowest bottome of misery Tim. What followes of this Silas That seeing such a fall followes sinne sinne is to be fled as one would shun a breakenecke downfall with all godly care and watchfulnesse before it be committed and repentance afterward Tim. Tell vs now wherein consists the vnlikelines betweene Adams sinne and Christs righteousnesse Sil. Heerein the righteousnesse of Christ is of more great strength and efficacie to iustifie then Adams offence was to condemne Tim. Now open the wordes what is this he saith Manie are dead through the offence of one Silas By one he meaneth Adam by many he meaneth all it being set against a few by dead hee meaneth separated or cast out from God vnto euerlasting death Tim. What do ye obserue heere Sil. This thing peculiarly that the infinite and Diuine Iustice is a wonderfull scarfull thing seeing it being but once hurt in one offence of Adam yet inflicted extreame and eternall misery on a whole worlde of men oh let that Iustice be dreadfull to thee Tim. What dooth he heere meane by Grace and guifte by Grace Silas Some thinke Grace doth signifie Gods fauour and Gift the holy Ghost and such good thinges as wee obtaine by him Tim. But how thinke you these words are to be taken Silas By Grace is vnderstoode Christ his righteousnesse whereof the grace and free fauour of God is the roote and fountaine Tim. What signifieth that gift by Grace Silas That most blessed condition wherein they bee which haue Christ his righteousnesse of frec fauour imputed to them Tim. What is that blessed condition Sil. That they are not onely absolued and quit from all guilt of sinne both Adams and their owne and so from all punishment temporall and eternall but also are adorned and cloathed with Christs perfect iustice innocency euen to the obtaining of eternall life Tim. By what similitude do ye explaine this difference betweene Grace and gift by Grace Silas Of a poore miserable man in bondage for debt to his Prince who not onely hath his debt freely discharged by his Soueraigne and King but withall hath a large treasure of many thousand pounds giuen him The treasure bestowed by the Kings Liberality is grace because it comes of free fauour and his happie condition in that of poore he is made rich may be called Gifte by Grace so it fareth in the case of a sinner Christs righteousnesse bestowed vpon him freely is Gods grace and the gift by Grace is that blessed condition wherein he is set through that righteousnesse imputed to his faith being of a sinner made perfectly iust and the child heire of God euen heire annexed with Christ. Rom. 8 17. Tim. What is meant by this that grace hath more abounded Sil. That the righteousnes which commeth by Christ doth in many degrees exceed in excellency and force the guilt and hurt that came by Adam Tim. Declare this vnto vs how grace hath farre exceeded sinne Sil. Because by the grace of Christ we haue forgiuenes of sinne we are regenerated and adopted to be the sonnes of God we are become brethren of Christ his members heires of his kingdome yea heires of this world also for all is ours 1 Cor. 3 22. By what similitude can ye expresse this super aboundance of gracs Sil. Of a Surgeon not onely healing a wound by his medicine but making one stronger and fairer then before Secondly of an Emperor not onely drawing a wretch out of prisou but aduancing him to all manner of riches and dignity so hath the grace of God abounded not onely for pardon of Adams sinne but to many excellent purposes besides to the engrafting vs into Christ to iustificatiō to reconciliation to sanctification to adoption to preseruation in grace to glorification in heauen Tim. What is the instruction to be made of this Sil. That beleeuers haue gotten more by Christ then they lost by Adam by whome wee should haue had an carthly paradice and vnconstant happinesse Secondly that exceeding and vnmeasurable grace of Christ should stirre vp and prouoke vnto exceeding loue obedience thankfulnesse and praise of Christ who is to be blessed againe and againe for euer and euer DIAL XIII Verse 16. Neyther is the guift so as that which entred in by one that sinned for the fault came of one offence vnto condemnation but the gift is of many offences to iustification Tim. VVHat doth this text containe Sil. An explaining of the difference or vnlikenesse put downe in the former verse concerning Adam and Christ. Tim. What was that difference Sil. That the grace of Christ was of more excellency and force to restore vs then was Adams sin to hurt vs. Tim. How is this explained to vs here Sil. Adams sinne that condemned him and vs all was but one Christs righteousnes couereth that sinne and infinite others which we haue added to it Tim. What seuer all things do ye obserue in this verse Sil. A threefold opposition or three things set against three as contraries First the gift and fault Secondly iustification and condemnation Thirdly one offence and many Tim. What is meant here by gift Sil. The righteousnes of Christ freely giuen and that most happy condition which the faithfull are in by hauing it allowed to be their iustice being now not onely absolued from all sinnes but made iust there by and heires of eternall life Tim. What is meant here by that which entred in by one that sinned Sil. This is meant by it first Adams fault in his disobedience to God Secondly that woefull condition wherein all men are wrapt by it being not onely depriued of perfect iustice which they had by creation but couered now with the filth and condemnation of sin thus it is expounded in the next words Tim. What is signified by condemnation Sil. The pronouncing of all men for sinners and worthy adiudging them to eternall torment as in ciuill condemnation the malefactour is first pronounced guilty and thereupon adiudged to his punishment Tim. How came
Righteous Tim. WHat doth this Scripture containe Silas First a rehearsall of the comparison betweene Adam and Christ begun in the twelfth verse Secondly a laying forth the ground of this whole comparison Tim. Declare the comparison as it is rehearsed in the 18. Verse Silas As by the offence of one Adam guiltinesse came ouer all men to make them subiect to death so on the contrary part the righteousnesse of Christ imputed to beleeuers through Gods free fauour iustifieth them that they may become partakers of eternal life Or thus as by Adam guiltinesse came on all men to death eternall so by Christ righteousnesse is giuen to all beleeuers vnto life eternall Tim. What is the ground of all this comparison Silas That Adam and Christ by the decree of God are not as two particular persons but as two rootes or stocks or heads of all mankinde that as out of the one springeth sin and death by Nature so out of the other springeth righteousnesse and life by Grace Tim. Whereunto tends all this Silas To make vs to vnderstand that we are iustified not by our owne workes but by Faith in Iesus Christ. For hauing in our selues by meanes of Adams offence guiltinesse death how can our workes iustifie vs and if they do not then Christs his obedience apprehended by faith must be our Iustice before God Tim. Now let vs expound the words and gather instructions What doth he meane heere by the offence of one Silas The sinne of Adam which was but one sinne as himselfe was but one person Tim. What learne yee by this That guiltinesse came on all men to condemnation Sil. That there is not one that came of Adam by naturall generation which escaped the condition of sinne and death Christ onely is exempted who was conceyued by the Holy ghost and not by the seede of man Tim. What do ye obserue heerein Sil. This namely how dreadfull a thing the offence of Gods Iustice is when but one sinne done in a moment could wrap a world of men in euerlasting death and paine Tim. What learne ye heereby That the Iustifying or righteousnes of Christ is set against the offence of one Silas That as the offence is without vs which makes vs all guilty so is the righteousnesse which iustifies vs not in vs but in Christ. Secondly that iustifying is an absoluing or acquitting vs from guilt and condemnation Tim. What meanes he by all men Silas All the Children of God which beleeue whereof there is an vniuersality as there is an vniuersality of the Reprobate Tim. Why doth he ioyne life vnto Iustification Iustification of life Sil. Not onely by the custome of speech peculiar to the Hebrewes but to teach that life is knit to righteousnesse and heereof it is also that faith and life are so often ioyned together because it is by Faith that wee take hold on righteousnesse which bringeth with it life as a proper and necessary effect Tim. What learne yee generally out of the whole 19. verse Sylas That Adam and Christ are not to be considered of as other particular persons bee but as two heades or rootes of all mankind which depend on them Tim. What seuerall and speciall things do ye now learne out of the 19. verse Sylas That Adams offence was disobedience to Gods word Secondly this disobedience ought to be familiarly known and what hurt we get by it therefore by an excellency called that disobedience as exceeding al others both for the quality and effects Thirdly this disobedience is communicated to all men to the making of them sinners which is done by an action called imputation and so it is euery mans owne sin no lesse then Adams Fourthly that distrust or doubting is the roote of all sinne and so to bee greatly taken heed of Adams fall began at doubting that carried him to disobedience Fiftly that wherein we disobey Gods will therein we bewray old Adam whose children wee shewe our selues to bee by our disobedience against Gods blessed commandement Tim. What do ye call disobedyence Sylas It is a vice which causeth vs not to beleeue God promising or threatning nor to obey him forbidding nor commanding either because the commandements be troblesome or because we cannot see the reason of them Tim. Now tell vs what was that whereby righteousnes and life entred into the world Sil. The obedience of Christ Iesus Tim. What is obedience Sil. It is a power by which a godly man is ready to do and to obey the will of God though the reason of it bee not vnderstood nor it appeare to be any way profitable Tim. Wherein did Christ shew his obedience to God Sil. Throughout his whole life doing alwayes in all things what his Father appoynted without any regard of men but especially in his death wherin he submitted himselfe wholy to the will and pleasure of his Father Tim. Is the actiue obedience of Christ in fulfilling the morall law by doing it necessary vnto the iustification of a sinner before God or his passiue obedience in sufferiug death doth it alone iustifie vs for the Scripture ascribeth our purging remission of sins and saluation to his bloud and death in many places it may seem that Christ kept the Law not for vs but for himselfe to make him a meete high Priest Sil. Iustification hath two parts First the forgiuenesse of sinnes secondly the making of vs iust For as we owed vnto God a satisfaction by death for the breach of the Law so we were bound to performe subiection to God with all power of body and soule and all the might of those powers euen from the time of our being Therefore as we needed the passion of our Lord to discharge the first debt of paine and punishment so the other debt of homage and conformity to the will of God was answered in the obedience of his life that so we might not onely escape death but finde an entrance into life eternall which without perfect obedience to the commandement might not bee granted according to the tennor of the Law Doe this and liue Leuit. 18 5. By which words it is plaine that by meere passiue obedience wee could not haue possession of life which is promised to doing all that is required in the Law for euen Christ himselfe by his doing the Law may claime and challenge eternall life and it cannot be denied him in rigor of iustice because hee fulfilled the condition of workes enioyned by the Law and how should we think to haue life without the Law done which not beeing possible by our selues therefore Christs obedience in his life must be imputed to make vs capable of life For seeing euery iote and tittle of the Law must bee done Mat. 5 18. therefore the sum and substance much more Now the summe of the lawe is to loue God with all our harts c. and this cannot be done by vs which are sinners then there must be a translation of the lawe from
vs in our persons vnto the person of our mediatour who must do euery iot for vs therefore he saith it behooued him to fulfill all righteousnesse Math. 3. and that hee is the end of the law for righteousnes Rom. 10 and hath made vs iust by his obedience as in our text and became subiect to the law to redeeme vs which were obnoxious to the law Gal. 4 4. 5. And indeed seeing Christ himselfe was giuen vs and that he was borne for vs wrought miracles suffered death arose ascended c. how must not his life also be ours Againe is it not written that Christ was made our sanctification as well as our righteousnesse and our righteousnesse as well as our redemption 1 Cor. 1 30. Moreouer he that continueth not to doe all things contained in the law is accursed Deut. 27. last verse Where of it followes that if any wil auoyd the curse of the law he stands bound constantly from his conception till his death to keepe the law which forsomuch as none can do by himselfe therefore all the contents of the law must be accomplished by our surety or else no escaping the curse Besides if the actuall obedience of Adam made vs sinners howe should we be iust without the actuall obedience of Christ and it seemes that Christ should be but halfe a Sauiour only suffering and not doing things pleasant to his Father for vs. What meaneth that that Christ sanctified himselfe for vs Iohn 17. and who knowes not that it is written of Christ that hee came to doe his Fathers will Heb. 10. Whereas Scripture attributeth our saluation to his bloud that is a Synecdoche a part put for the whole likewise where iustification is placed in forgiuenesse of sins Rom. 4 5 6. and the bloud of Christ shedde beeing his chiefest obedience as it comprehends the rest that went afore so it excludeth onely legall sacrifices as not meritorious Tim. Is not this a speciall marke of a good Christian to follow the example of Christ his obedience in our doings and sufferings Sylas It is so hereby men are knowne to be Christians if after Christs example they doe indeuour to doe the will of God and not by their profession only which may be in an hypocrite Tim. Why doth hee say many shall bee made iust and not in the present time many are made iust Sylas Because this obedience is giuen to the elect at what time they shall liue in the world and beleeue DIAL XVI Verses 20 21. Moreouer the law entred thereuppon that the offence should abound neuerthelesse where sinne abounded there grace abounded much more That as sinne hath raygned to death so might grace also raygne by righteousnes vnto eternall lyfe through Iesus Christ our Lord. Tim. WHat doe these words contayne Sylas The Conclusion of the whole treatise of Iustification by faith Tim. What is the matter of the conclusion Sylas In the conclusion he doth meet withall and make answere to a secret obiection made in the behalfe of the law The obiection is this that if the obedience of Christ be our full righteousnes before God without the works of the lawe then to what end doth the law serue To which the Apostle doth first propound his answere barely verse 20. and nakedly that the law was giuen first to encrease our guiltinesse Secondly that the grace of Christ thereby becomes more glorious the which the Apostle doth enlarge by a comparison of contraries verse 21. sinne and death set against righteousnesse and life as contrarie one to the other the sum of which comparison is thus much that as sin preuailes to make all guilty of death so the righteousnesse of Christ beeing freely giuen to the beleeuers doth preuaile much more to make them partakers of eternall life Tim. Now expound the words what is meant by the Law Silas The morall Law contained in the ten commandements Tim. In what meaning is it said it entred thereuppon Sil. The Apostle meaneth that it came in and entred vpon Adams offence which had made vs guilty of death that wee might become more guilty Some expound and say it entred beside the promise of grace as the more principall doctrine Tim. Was this the purpose of God in giuing the Law to encrease our guiltinesse Silas No not so the Apostle doth not note the intention of God with what purpose he gaue it but the euent that did follow the giuing of the Law that thereby our offence did more abound Tim. In what respects is offence and sinne said to abound by the Law Silas In these respects First because a Law beeing giuen sinne was made more grieuous now by the breach of it Secondly sinne is more stirred vp and irritated by the Law our nature desiring the things that are forbidden it Thirdly the Law doth affoord vs a clearer sight and knowledge of our sinnes which were more manifested vnto vs by the Law as may bee made plaine vnto vs by these comparisons first of a Glasse which makes vs see the spots of our face what they be and how foule they bee Secondly of a Candell which doth discouer vnto vs the thinges in a Roome which lye out of order and could not be espied in the darke So by the law we come to vnderstand what our sinnes be and how greeuous they are Tim. Tell vs now what is meant by Grace Silas The fauour of God in the free forgiuenesse of all sinnes by the merite of Christ his obedience Tim. In what sense is it said that grace abounded Silas In respect of vs and of our knowledge for by the forgiuenesse of our many and great sinnes the mercy and fauour of God in Christ did appeare most manifestly vnto vs and is more fully and famously knowne Tim. By what similitude may this be declared vnto vs Silas Of a skilfull Surgeon or Physition who by curing and healing great and desperate wounds and diseases doth not get more skill but doe more manifest their skill which they had Secondly of a most kind Prince or father who by pardoning some great faults of their Children or subiects do so much the more make known their clemency and kindnes by how much their offence was more heynous in like manner the more and fouler the sinnes be which be forgiuen vs of God the more plentifully doth he declare his grace From whence we learne first that wonderfull is the wisedome and goodnesse of God that can turne such a thing as sinne is to the praise of his grace as Dauids fall Psal. 51 1. and Peters deniall Luke 22 32. Secondly it affoordeth a great comfort to great sinners so as they feele their sinnes beleeue in Christ for whatsoeuer their sinnes be there is mercy with God more then to counteruaile them grace in Christ is more able to saue then Adams sinne to condemne Thirdly God suffereth men to abound in sinne with a meaning not to destroy them therefore but to poure and shew forth his goodnesse more richly
godly life notwithstanding all hinderances in their way from themselues from the world and Sathan because a holy life being continued in will at the length bring to a life eternall Thirdly seeing godlinesse of life doth by the ordinance of God necessarily leade vnto eternall life and they which do liue godlily may know that they doe so heereof it followeth that all the godly haue certainty and good assurance of their owne saluation if one may know that he liueth holily thereby he may know that he shall liue happily Tim. Wherefore are these wordes added Through Iesus Christ our Lord Silas To teach vs that all merite is to be sought out of our selues and to be found only in the person of Christ Iesus who by that which hee himselfe hath suffered and done hath fully deserued life eternall for all beleeuers which liue vprightly to whom therefore all praise honour and glory is due Amen For further clearing of this Scripture and hauing a little emptie Paper to fill vp I haue thought it not amis to set downe what our Diuines haue cited out of Antiquity for the sence of this latter clause that to the vnlerned it may appeare what consent is between vs and the Fathers in the Doctrine of grace When we finde life eternall to be called Grace saith Augustine wee haue S. Paul a magnificall defender of Grace Againe he calleth ' Death the Wages of sinne because it is due it is worthily payd it is rendred as a merit But least Iustice should lifte vp it selfe he sayeth not Eternall life is the Wages of it but tearmeth it the Grace of God and he addeth by Iesus our Lord least life should bee sought any other way but by our Mediatour Chrysost. Life eternall is not a retribution of labours but the free guift of God not deserued by vertue but giuen freely Ambros. Such as follow Faith shall haue life euerlasting Theodoretus he saith Grace not reward not by works saith Photinus but by Grace CHAP. VII DIAL I. Verse 1 2 3. Know yee not Brethren for I speake vnto them that know the Law that the Law hath dominion ouer a man as long as he liueth For the womā which is in subiection to a man is bound by the Law to a man while he liueth but if the man be dead she is deliuered from the Law of the Man so then if while the man liueth she taketh another Man she shall be called an Adulteresse But if the man be dead shee is free from the Law so that she is not an Adulteresse though she take another man Timotheus WHat parts may this seauenth Chapter be diuided into and what take you to be the purpose of the Apostle therein Silas The purpose of Paul is to confirme illustrate that Paradox or strange Doctrine propounded in the former Chapter of beeing not vnder the Law but vnder grace which haply some of the Iewes might haue taken as if the Apostle had bin an enemy to the knowledge and obedience of the Law therefore now he sheweth how our freedome from the Law is to be vnderstood and vpon what groundes and reasons it is founded This is shewed and declared by the similitude of ciuill marriage wherein the woman during natural life is obliged to the Husband 1. to be his or to him onely 2. not to depart from him 3. nor to marry with another but the husband being dead she is free being 1. his no more 2. and may without guilt of Adultery marry to another 3. to bring forth fruite to another to the second man So all the elect before new byrth are in bondage to sin to which they bring forth Children that is euill workes by the force of the Lawe but after regeneration the vigour and coaction of the Law ceaseth in part at least and they 1. are free being dead to the Law and 2. married vnto Christ. 3. do now bring forth good workes as children to God Paul exemplieth in the woman rather then in the man because her Obligation and bond is straighter toward the man then of him toward her for by the Lawe the man was suffered to giue a Bill of Diuorce to the woman so was it not on the contrary also because his meaning was to compare vs to the wife The Chapter consisteth of three parts The first setteth out our liberty from the Law and proueth it by 3. reasons in verse 1 2 3 4 5 6. Secondly he aunswereth certaine obiections made against the Law which he excuseth and commendeth by the manifest and necessarie effects also by the properties and Nature of the Law all this in his owne person Thirdly the spirituall combate betweene grace consenting to the Law and flesh or corruption resisting the Lawe is described in his owne example both touching the fight and battell and the yssue or end of it Tim. What be the parts of this similitude Silas They be two First a proposition in three Verses Secondly an application in the fourth verse The proposition is thus that the Law bindeth a man so long as he liueth the which is amplified two wayes First by the testimony of the Romanes themselues of whom hee saith they knew the truth of it Tim. What are wee to learne from the first proofe of the proposition Silas First the wisedome of the Apostle in preuenting the offence of the conuerted Iewes to whom hee wrote not onely by a louing Title in calling them Brethred but by attributing the knowledge of the Law to them and by taking vpon him the defence of the Lawe Secondly Gods people ought not to bee ignoraunt of Gods Law for it doth both helpe the teachers to speak to a people endued with knowledge and the people to know those things whereof their teachers speake Tim. What is the vse of this Silas It reproueth such as lacke knowledge and labour not for it as being iniurious both to themselues to their teachers Secondly it must stirre vp all men to endeauour to encrease in knowledge as they doe desire their owne profiting or the ease and comforte of their teachers Lastly it warneth Ministers by Paules example in their teaching to preuent offences and to speake wisely Tim. What is the other way by which hee doth explaine the proposition Silas By the example of marriage whereby the wife is linkt vnto her husband and is not free till death so as if she marry another while he liues she commits adultery but he being dead she is free to marry to whom shee will that shee may bring foorth to her new husband Euen so our first husband to wit sinnefull corruption by the Lawe irritating and prouoking it brought foorth euill workes as Children to death but our corruption being mortified by the death of Christ wee are dead to the Law and it is dead to vs as the vigor of sin hauing now no force to engender or encrease sin in vs so as we are free to passe ouer and
to marry our selues to Christ as to a new husband by his spirit to bring foorth good works as fruites to God Tim. What thinges are we to learne from this example of Mariage Sil. First that the bond of Mariage is exceeding strickt which nothing but death can dissolue and breake True it is that Adultery doth breake the knot of marriage and the Iewes gaue vnto their wiues bils of diuorse by permission to auoid an inconuenience yet the Apostle doth truely say of the wife that she is bound till death because he speaketh of a marriage well ruled and rightly gouerned wherein nothing hath force to loose the knot saue death Marriage by Gods institution which Paul heere respecteth was to continue so long as life lasteth Gen. 2. Tim. Whereof should this put vs in mind Silas Of the exceeding great care that both Parents and Children-should haue about the entring into this estate of marriage which doth oblige and tie persons euen till death that which is but once to be done lasts for the space of life carying continual weale or woe with it had neede long to be thought of before it bee done rashnesse is the mother of late repentance in marriage especially therefore be wise Tim. What other thing is to be learned out of this example Silas That the woman being married hath not power ouer her owne body which by the Law of marriage is subiect to her husband for lawfull begetting of Children Therefore if she withdraw her body from her husband and giue it to another man shee committeth that most odious and most dangerous sinne of Adultery so doth the man likewise if he giue the power of his body for generation to any other saue vnto his wife but if so be that adultery bee committed by either partie seeing the offending partie by Gods law ought to dye and is ciuilly dead therefore the innocent party by vertue of the Law is free to marry where they will the knotte of marriage being loosed Mat. 5. 32 and 19. 9. Also heere we learne the lawfulnesse of second marriages Lastly that the law doth rule ouer the liuing onely not at all ouer the dead because the liuing can keepe or breake it so cannot the dead DIAL II. Verse 4. Euen so yee also my Brethren are dead as concerning the Law by the body of Christ that ye should be coupled to another euen vnto him that is raised from the dead that we should bring foorth fruites to God Tim. VVHat doth this Text containe Silas An application of the former example contained in these words So ye my Brethren are dead vnto the Law The summe whereof before beeing deliuered more at large may be contracted into these few words As the wife is free to marry to another her former husband beeing dead so the lawe and sinne beeing dead through the death of Christ the beleeuers are free to ioyne themselues vnto Christ raised vp againe as vnto a second husband by his Spirit to bee made fruitefull in good workes as before they had beene full of sinnefull workes while they were subiect to the coaction and prouocation of the Law Tim. What be the parts of this application Silas Foure First the freedome of beleeuers from sinne their first husband Secondly the meanes thereof to wit the body of Christ crucified Thirdly the end of this freedome that they may marry vnto Christ beeing raised from the dead Fourthly the effects of this marriage the bringing foorth fruites to God Tim. Now expound the wordes and tell vs why he calleth the Iewes his brethren Sil. First they were his kinsmen according to the flesh and such are called brethren in Scripture Secondly they were of the same profession and Religion beeing common worshippers of one true God Tim. What meaneth this when he saith ye are dead to the Law Silas Thus much as if hee had said ye are mortified or dead to sinne or sinne is extinct as touching the dominion and power which it was wont to haue ouer you in regard whereof the law cannot now exercise his force eyther to condemne vs as guilty or to constraine vs vnto sinne Therefore ye are dead in respect of the Law by the mortification of your sinnes so as the law cannot be the vigor and strength of sin as heeretofore it was wont to doe Tim. Why doth hee not rather say the Law is dead to you then you are dead to the Law Silas Because of the infirmity of the weake Iewes which dwelt at Rome who attributing too much vnto the Law would haue beene offended with that speech yet he saith that which is all one for it is sinne by which the Law hath force to condemne men and which is encreased and stirred vp in vnregenerate men by the prohibitions of the Law Therefore sinne beeing mortified and we spiritually dead to it the Law hath thereby lost all his force both of accusing vs and prouoking vs vnto sinne Eyther party beeing dead man or woman the bond of marriage is dissolued also see verse 6. Tim. But while wee liue heere sinne doth still liue in vs and we shall still haue vse of the law why than doth the Apostle say we are dead in respect of the law and sin Silas The Apostle in this phrase hath respect vnto that which one day Christians doe hope shall be to wit that their sin which is partly mortified and dead in them shall be perfectly dead and pluckt vp by the roots in the mean space there are still in the best men many things to be reprooued by the law to be lamented for and to bee amended and reformed according to the rules of the lawe but the law as it is the force of sin to encrease it so it is taken away as also touching the curse it is abolished to the beleeuers and concerning the strict obseruation whereuppon followeth malediction Tim. What instructions are we to learne now from the first words of the text thus opened and declared Sylas Two first they set before vs the marke that al our life long wee are to ayme at that is carefully to suppresse and mortifie our sinfull lusts for this is a worke not of one day or one yeare Secondly as any Christian gets power to mortifie his lusts and goes on still so to doe let him assure himselfe that hee is so much the further off from the condemnation and rigour of the lawe and so much neerer to Christ and heauenly blessednes Tim. By what meanes are the faithfull dead to sinne and to the law Sil. By the body of Christ crucified and raysed againe from the dead for wee are said to bee dead to sinne by the body of Christ dead and crucified in as much as the body of Christ fastned vpon the crosse hath merited and obtained for beleeuers remission of all their sins and the Holy Ghost also by whose vertue in dwelling sin is dayly mortified and maistered in them
till it bee quite abollished and extinct vtterly at their natural death Tim. What doth this teach Sylas That the death and mortification of sin as well as the sorgiuenesse of sinne is the fruite and effect of Christes death Tim. Whereunto should this serue vs Sylas To a twofold purpose first to stirre vp in Christians a great care to sub due and kill their sins least Christs death be made voyde vnto them for it neuer profits any vnto forgiuenesse whome it doth not profit vnto mortification Secondly such as feele sin die and loose strength may bee perswaded thereby that they haue a sauing part in the death of Christ it beeing made effectuall to them for mortification of their lusts Tim. What is the end of our liberty and freedom from sin the law Sil. That it may bee free and lawfull for Christians to passe ouer to a second marriage to bee ioyned to another husband that is to Christ being dead and raysed againe and for very good reason it is that the Apostle after the death of Christ doth make mention of the resurrection of Christ. First because vppon his resurrection dependeth the force efficacy and fruite of his death which had no whit benefited the Church if he had not been raised from the dead Secondly because Christ being now raised again to life and raigning in glory he is able to do towards his Church and euery member of it all husbandly duties of protection supporting instructing blessing enriching her with graces and gifts of al sorts Lastly to teach that as Christ dyed and rose againe so it is not enough for vs to crucifie sin but wee are to rise to a new life as well bound to liue godlily and righteously as to cease from euil Tim. What are wee to learne from this that you haue sayd Sil. First such as haue not sinne mortified in them are strangers to Christ for wee cannot at once bee vnder the law as the seruants to sin and yet bee ioyned to Christ as a wife to an husband Secondly the great dignity of euery true Christian which hath his sinnes taken away touching the guilt by forgiuenes and touching power and tiranny by mortification such a one is the spouse of Christ and is one with him and with all his graces and liues by his Spirit which enableth him to do good workes acceptable to God as sweet fruites are acceptable to men or as childeren which are the fruite of the wombe bee gratefull to their parents A most happy estate to be fruitful in good workes through the Spirit of Christ to whome we are ioyned in spiritual marriage Sylas Is not this the effect of our being ioyned in marriage with Iesus Christ that wee may abounde in the fruites of the Spirit Sil. It is so as the chiefe effect of naturall marriage is the begetting of Children whome the Hebrewes call the fruit of the wombe Psal. 127. and 128. So the maine fruit of our spirituall mariage is the bringing forth such fruites as are commanded in the law This doeth first of all encourage vs to labour in euery good worke because God will accept it as a pleasant fruit Secondly it reprooueth such as are either vtterly and wholly or partly vnfruitefull in the workes of righteousnesse for as the barrennesse of the wombe was a reproach amongst the Iewes so barrennesse in good workes is much more reprochfull to a Christian who is elected redeemed called ioyned espoused to Christ sanctified also to this end to glorify God by fruits of new obedience DIAL III. 5.6 For when we were in the flesh the affections of sin which were by the law had force in our members to bring forth fruites to death But now ye are delmered from the law he being dead in whome ye were holden that we should serue in newnes of spirit and not in the oldnes of the letter Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Scripture Silas To confirme the exhortation of bringing forth fruites to God by the comparison of contraries wherein our old and first mariage with sin is compared with our latter new mariage to Christ. The summe where of is this If in our first mariage sin was effectuall in vs by the law to bring foorth euill woorkes as fruites to death now that we are freed from sin and the law and be married to Christ let his spirit be effectual in vs to bring forth good workes as fruits to God if before we brought forth euil fruites vnto destruction much more now let vs bring forth fruite pleasing to God and wholesome to our selues Tim. What then be the parts of this text Silas Two the first hath the condition of our first mariage with sinne in the 5. verse The second part hath the condition of our second mariage with Christ in the sixth verse Tim. Nowe expound the word and tell vs what is meant here by the flesh and by being in the flesh Silas By the flesh is meant our sinfull corruption such as we bring with vs into the world through carnall generation and by beeing in the flesh is meant to remaine or abide securely in the estate of corruption our sin and our nature being vnited together as husband and wife And this is here to bee noted that it is one thing to haue flesh in vs and another thing to be in the flesh For the regenerate haue flesh that is some sinfull corruption in them because their sanctification is vnperfect but they are not in the flesh because their sinfull nature is mortified and reformed before their new birth they are in the flesh being euery way obnoxious vnto sin after new birth the flesh is in them because sin stil dwels in them Tim. What are we to learne from this kind of speech Silas That all the elect before their conuersion are so necrely linkt to sinne as they and sinne are but one euen as the woman coupled in marriage vnto the man they are no more twaine but one And note heere that in this comparison sinne answereth the Husband we our selues the wife married first vnto sinne and then to Christ. Tim. What is meant heere by affections and why are they called the affections of sinne The word signifies passions which with great force affect the soule and generally all euil motions But more particularly by affections is meant not onely the lustes which be in the inferiour part of our soule as in our wil but they comprehend our reason and minde as it is corrupt by sinne and so our euill thoughts counsels purposes deuises immagination discourses are all contained vnder this word affections And they are called the affections of sinne because they 1. come from sinne 2. they are themselues sinfull and 3. eggers vnto sinnefull workes begetting in vs those workes of the flesh mentioned Gal. 5 19 20. Tim. How are these sinnefull affections saide to bee by the Law seeing euery man by Nature hath them engrafted in him before
euer he heare and know the Law Silas It is true we haue these affections by Nature before we heare the Law for they are borne with vs yet they are saide to bee by the Law First because thereby they are laide open and made more knowne vnto vs. Secondly by it sinnes are accused condemned and made more greeuous insomuch as he that offends against the will of God once knowne hath the greater sinne Thirdly by the Law our sinneful affections are more irritated For the Law as a let in the way forbidding and withstanding them maketh them become more fierce vehement through the fault of our corrupt Nature which endeauoureth to do that which is forbid vnto it and to rebell when it is crossed by prohibitions and comminations of the Law Tim. What are we to learne from hence Silas That sinfull lusts are most venomous and poysonfull things being encreased by the Law which God appointed as a meane and remedie to restraine them Secondly the vse of the Law towards all vngodly men is to encrease and manifest their sinnes to cause them to know their sinnes and more eagerly to run after them Tim. What vse heereof Silas It admonisheth al what cause they haue to bee humbled in regard of their accursed Nature which causeth so good a thing as the Law to be occasion of more sinnes Tim. What is meant heere by members Silas The powers and faculties of soule and body in which sinfull affections worke mightily by an inwarde secret force not onely in the eares eyes hands mouth c. but in senses appetite will and in the vnderstanding and minde Tim. What are we to learne from hence Silas That the affections of sinne are no weake and feeble thinges but mighty and forceable to engender wicked works which may be declared by comparison of that force which mans seed hath in generation which al see to be operatiue and fruitful and by that seede which is cast into the earth which also is effectuall and full of force Secondly by the example of Gods children after their new byrth in whom their lustes had force to effect fearefull things as in Sarah Rebecca Noah Lot Dauid Peter Thirdly by the example of men vnregenerate who by the force of their lustes haue beene carried vnto monstrous iniquity as Caine Esau Ahab Iudas Seminarie Priests Iesuits Gunpowder Traitors Tim. What profit is to be made heereof to our selues Silas By consideration of the strength of sinne men should be much moued to get all the strength they can to resist such a mighty enemy Secondly it reproues secure Christians which striue not against it because they neuer thinke nor know how forcible a thing is and by their security are miserably oppressed by the tiranny of sin which keepeth them vnder as vassals Tim. What is meant heere by fruite to death Silas Sinfull workes which do deserue death and leade to death without repentance all sinneful desires thoughts wordes and workes be in their owne nature mortall and become veniall by grace onely Tim. What be our Lessons from hence Silas First that sinne hath eternal death yoaked to it Secondly the vnhappy estate of men vnregenerate all whose workes are mortiferous and deadly and this is the condition of our first marriage with sin that all the fruites that come of this marriage bee as Children dead borne Lastly this should moue in vs an earnest desire and care to be diuorced from the flesh that wee may passe ouer vnto Christ as vnto a new husband For howsoeuer carnall secure sinners doe not directly intend destruction as the end of their course yet Sathan intendeth it and the sinners themselues can reape no other fruite as Chap. 6 22 23. DIAL IIII. Verse 6. But now ye being deliuered from the law be being dead in whom ye were holden that ye should serue in newnesse of Spirite and not in the oldnesse of the letter Tim. VVHat doth this Text set foorth Silas The condition of our newe and latter marriage to Christ whose Spirite is effectuall in the faithfull to bring foorth fruites to God Tim. What things consider ye in this second marriage Silas Two things First the freedome from the Law and also from sinne our former husband Secondly fruitfullness in good workes by the Spirite of Christ their second husband Tim. What is it to bee deliuered from the law and what meaneth the Apostle by him that is dead Silas Heere is meant deliuerance from it as it is the strength and vigor of sinne to irritate and enrage it and not as it is the rule of a righteous life also by him that is dead is meant sinne which in the regenerate is saide to be dead though sinne still liue in them as wee vse to say of one stucke to death that hee is dead because hee cannot recouer or of one that hath his braine pan broken that hee cannot liue So is sinne dead it can neuer recouer that strength and power it was wont to haue before new birth Tim. Why doeye rather thinke the Apostle meanes sinne by that which is dead then the Law Silas Because it doth not agree with the nature of the law to bee dead it being a word of life comming from the liuing God but our sinnes are mortified and dead and then the law ceaseth to compell or to prouoke vnto euill notwithstanding this there is still vse of the Law towards men which be mortified because mortification is vnperfect therefore there is much in euery godly person to be repented of and reformed by the law Tim. In what sence may we be said to haue beene held of the law or sinne Silas Because our corruption is as a strong bonde or corde which holds all the faculties of our soule and body fast tyed and linked to it as we cannot stirre one inch from it till we bee conuerted And albeit regenerate persons haue sinne abiding in them by which they are hindred in their course and in some sort are held that is held backe with it yet they cannot be said to be held in their sinnes as when they were naturall men because sinne that bond that held them is now broken by the grace of mortification whereby the power of natiue in-bred corruption is greatly weakened Tim. If the godly be held of sinne otherwise then naturall men be shew vs where is the difference Sil. A naturall man is as one whom the Tyrant keepeth still in his owne hand and possession hauing the ful power ouer him a regenerate person is as one that hath escaped the bondage of a Tyrant and yet is still troubled and assaulted by him Take another comparison A naturall man is as one lying in prison fast bounde hand and foote held fast in bonds and chaines at the pleasure of his keeper but a regenerate person is as one that hath broken out of the prison and is at liberty yet still cumbred and clogged with some peece of his fetters
are not vnder the law he doeth now purpose to auoyde offence and for larger instruction to lay forth the true vse of the lawe both in respect of men vnregenerate and regenerate the vse of the law touching men vnregenerate is threefold First the true knowledge of sin which is shewed vs by the law this is in the seauenth verse Secondly the encrease or irritation of sin in the eight verse Thirdly death or the sence of Gods anger for sin in the 9. verse and other verses following Tim. How doeth the Apostle enter into this treatise to extoll and commend the vse of the law Sylas By a prolepsis or preuention of some thing which might be obiected or alledged against his former doctrine in the fifth verse vnto which in this verse hee doeth make an answere so as the parts of this text be two The first is an obiection moued by way of question in these wordes What shall we say then is the lawe sin The second is a replication or answere in the wordes following God forbid c. Tim. Tell vs nowe the summe of this obiection and from whence did it arise Silas The Summe is thus much Is the Law the cause of sinne For this is the meaning of these words Is the Law sinne that is to say doth the Law beget it bring it forth and leade vs vnto sin This obiection ariseth from this that Paul had taught that the affections of sinne were by the Law verse 5. which some aduersary belike taking hold of it did so wrest it or might so turne it as if hee had taught that the the Law did perswade to sinne and were the proper efficient cause of it which contumelious and reproachfull slander would haue touched God the Author Tim. What instruction may me gather from this part of the Text touching the Obiection Sil. These two First that no Doctrine can bee so sound nor so warily deliuered but malicious personnes will cauill and wrest it to a contrary meaning This proceeds from an hatred they beare vnto their teachers which causeth them that they distaste their doctrine and carpe at it Secondly the Ministers of Christ must bee careful and able not only to propound the truth soundly but to defende it against wicked obiections and cauillations otherwise there is danger least weake and vnstable mindes be peruerted and drawn from the truth by such as speak against it our nature being more prone to suck in error then to receiue the truth Tim. Tell vs now how the Apostle doth answere the former Obiection Sil. Two waies First by infiiciation or denial in these words God forbid which are wordes that vtter a loathing or detestation of such an impiety as to make the Law the cause of sinne as if he should say He was so far from doing any such thing as he did abhorre the motion or thought of any such Doctrine Tim. What instruction haue we from this part of Paules answere Sil. That it is our dutie when wee heare the truth of God depraued not onely to mislike it but to declare that we haue it in detestation and abhomination which serues to reprooue cold and indifferent Christians who can abide to heare the true Ministers of Christ and their Doctrine to be slaundered without any care or greefe like to Luke warme Laodiceans Tim. What is the next and second part of Paules 〈◊〉 Silas By argumentation and sound reason fetched taken from the contrary As thus The Law cannot bee the cause to beget and perswade sinne for that it is the Instrument to discouer it and make sinne knowne vnto vs detecting the deceits and assaults of such an enemie that wee beware of it as Paules Kinsman detected the treason of the Iewes against Paul Vpon which detection of sinne if sinne do the more rage and rebell in vs against the will of God this is not to be imputed to the Law but to our corrupt Nature which growes worse more fierce by that which should restraine and helpe it All this the Apostle proues by his owne example for he confesseth that there were some sinnes which hee knew not to be sinnes till the Law did reueale them vnto him to be so whereof he giues instance in lustes or in the euill motions of the minde suddenly conceiued vvithout the consent of our will of which he saith That had not the Law told him they had beene sinnes saying Thou shalt not Lust hee had not mistrusted them or thought them to be such greeuous matters as to bee offences of God and to deserue damnation I had not knowne lust except the Lord had saide c. Tim. What are wee to learne by this that the Apostle names himselfe and prooues these thinges by his owne experience Silas Two thing first it is lawfull for the Ministers of the worde to report what they haue learned by their owne experience in the matter of sin and saluation this is a great helpe and confirmation of the hearers if it bee truely and discreetly done Secondly this example of Paul directs all men to enter and go downe into themselues to get vnderstanding of their estate and case the reason is because till they come to see and feele howe corrupt and wretched they are through sinne they will neuer be humble nor perceiue what need they haue of Christ but contrariwise they will rather despise and set light by the doctrine of free Saluation by the bloud of Christ as it hapned vnto this Apostle who being a Pharify before he descēded into himself and searched his heart by the light of Gods law he tooke himselfe to be righteous by the workes which he did and not onely neglected Christ but persecuted the doctrine of grace howbeit after the lawe had reuealed vnto him the corruption of his nature and shewed him that his euill desires though not consented to were sinnes and woorthy of death and after that he beleeued and considered this it greatly danted him made him see and feele that al his righteousnesse of workes and ciuill honesty was nothing and that hee was a dead man without Christ. Therefore they are in a miserable case which haue not got the true knowledge of themselues by the law for such cannot nor will not seeke after the grace and health of the Gospell Tim. Now ye haue told vs what we are to learn from the manner of his answere let vs heare what the matter of his answere will teach vs Silas It teacheth vs sundry things the first is a speciall office of the law which is to shew bewray sin vnto vs as by a glasse we come to see the spots of our face so by the law wee come to know our sinnes and as by the light of the Sun we discouer little moates so the light of Gods lawe detects euen the least offences against God or our neighbour this office of shewing sin vnto vs the law performes in sundry
both the duty and testimony of a truely deliuered sinner which hath indeed by the death of Christ escaped death Tim. But tell me what course sinners are to take that they may get the sound feeling of their owne woefull damnation due to their sinnes Silas It is no easie thing to get it nor euery sinners case to come by it yet I will commend vnto the sinner desirous to be humbled foure looking-glasses wherein if he vse often and intentiuely to behold himselfe hee may haply through Gods mercy attaine his desire to his euerlastaing good The first is Adams fall wherein hee shall see not onely himselfe depriued of all goodnes and exposed to all sin and misery but the whole race of mankind and al creatures in heauen and earth folded in gods fearefull malediction and vengeance The second is the curse of the Law in which he shall see God as a most terrible Iudge most seuerely denouncing vnto his Creature the worke of his hands all the miseries of this life bodily and spirituall which are innumerable separation in the end of life of the body from the soule which is terrible and after this life ended euerlasting destruction both of body and soule which is most horrible and all this euen for the least transgression of his Law Deut. 27 26. The third is the estate of a damned man in Hell where he shall see a liuely picture of misery it selfe to with a man for sinne chained vp in a prison where there is a continuall night and most lamentable roaring and outcries hauing for his companions the Diuell and his Angels and the Reprobate his tender flesh extreamely pained in euery ioynt and sinew his soulc lying in vnexpressable horror filled with hatred of God blasphemy and despaire fretting and vexing not so much in the sence of present punishment which yet is easelesse and endlesse as in remembrance of his exceeding losse beeing cast out of Gods kingdome without hope of recouery And here remember I pray that this woefull estate euery one hath deserued a thousand waies The fourth and last is the most bitter death and passion of our Lord Iesus wherein let him see and consider himselfe as principal debter and Christ but as his surety suffering for his sinne euen at the hands of his owne vassals the Iewes Gentiles most greeuous tants scornes and reproaches most smartfull buffeting whipping crowning and piercing with thornes speares and nayles in his head hands and feete his most tender parts and at the hands of his angry reuenging Father receiuing such inuisible strokes in his soule as drew from his body abundance of bloudy sweat in the garden and from his mouth a most dolefull complaint and crie vpon the Crosse My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Heere vpon if a man will consider this deepely that if Gods wrath did lye so heauy vpon Christ for sinne imputed who also had his diuine power to vphold his man-hood in suffering it how heauy will it lye when it lighteth vpon a meere man and that for his own sin This meditation may preuaile much to bring downe the stoutest and proudest heart and stomacke that is in the sight and feeling of his owne misery which by desart of sinne is due to him in iustice or if this doe it not the case is very hard for it is a signe of a full hard heart not to be touched with griefe for such greeuous things as the onely Sonne of God for our cause endured Tim. Now that you haue told vs how the Law doth kill vs by engendering in vs a sence of Gods wrath and eternall death let me heare you declare vnto me by what meanes sinne did kill Paul Silas Sinne deceiued him and so slew him deceitfull sinne killed him Tim. What is the instruction from hence Silas That sinne is a deceitfull thing may appeare by these three wayes First by the testimony of Scripture as Heb. 3 12 13. Take heed least any of you be hardened through the deceitfulnesse of sinne also in Ephe. 4 22. the lusts of sinne are called deceiueable lusts now whatsoeuer God saith is deceitfull must needs be so for hee cannot lye Secondly by the example first of Paul confessing that sinne deceiued him he being very wise learned and heedfull Secondly of Peter who was deceiued by his sinfull presumption Thirdly of Salomon and Dauid by incontinency Fourthly of Iudas who was deceiued by couetousnesse Lastly of Herod by pride Thirdly by reason because it is the brood of the Diuell that olde Serpent full of subtilty who deceiued the whole world by his guile and craft the Child being like his father such damme such broode Second reason sinne is in quality contrary to holinesse therefore as holinesse hath sincerity and truth so sinne hath deceit and guile annexed to it Lastly seeing it makes our hearts deceitfull therefore it selfe must needs be full of deceite For that which maketh a thing to be such it selfe is more such Quod facit tale id est magis tale Aristot. Tim. What hurt and daunger is there in being deceyned Silas From this deceite of sinne springs hardnesse of heart and spirituall deadnesse Heb. 3 13. And after this there followes eternall death without the mercies of God and great repentance Sil. Are all men deceiued alike Silas No the wicked are deceiued wholly willingly and vnto their destruction The elect in some things are deceiued by sin euen after calling but neuer wholly and finally Tim. After what sort and wayes doth sinne deceiue vs Silas First by making men thinke that they are aliue and happy when they are dead and miserable thorough sinne Secondly by causing them to neglect their inward thoughts and lusts resting in outward obedience onely as if that were enough and could iustifie them Thirdly by insinuating it selfe into their harts becomming more pleasant and delightfull to them by the prohibitions of the Law forbidding and condemning it By these three waies especially was Paul deceiued with sin Fourthly by blinding our iudgement by putting out the eyes of our minde that we should not be able to see it to be a sin in our selues which we see to be a sin in others not to be a fault in particular which men do know to be a fault in the generall As the couetous proud malicious will condemn couetousnes pride hatred in general yet perceiue not that their owne actions sauour of these vices Fiftly sin perswades mē that the things which the law forbids are good commodious for them as some kind oflyes and some litle breaking of the Saboth and vsury such like sin dooth often put on the name and countenaunce of vertue as pride of cleanlinesse niggardnesse of thrift great swearing and reuenge of manhood courage c. Seauenthly it turneth away our thoughts from thinking earnestly vpon the punishment due to sin Eightly when we do any good it maketh vs ascribe it to
to his Sonne Christ to enioy his righteousnesse and life they must feele their owne death denounced by the law against the desert of their sins for howsoeuer there were in Pauls conuersion somethings extraordinary yet this is ordinary to him with other elect sinners First to be killed by the law in the sence of their sinnes and damnation ere they be made aliue by the grace of the Gospell Tim. Whereto serueth this Silas First to comfort them which haue got a tast of their owne destruction and are troubled and humbled by it such are in a good way to Christ as a corasiue or potion when it smarts workes a good signe Secondly it serueth sharply to reproue such as are forward to draw the promises of life vnto themselues before the lawe hath slayne and wrought a sence of death in them it is all one as if they would haue their wound or sore healed without lanching their disease or sicknes cured without phisick Tim. We haue heard that not the law but sinne beeing irritated by the lawe workes death what would the Apostle haue vs to learne by that Sylas That it brings to open knowledge the malice of our naturall sinnne and prauity which consists heerein in that it doeth abuse perniciously such a good thing as the lawe is to the encreasing of sinne and to the woorking of death This may bee set forth by the comparison of such stubborn diseases as are made the worse by such remedies as are applyed to heale them euen such a vile thing sinne is which taketh occasion to breake out more vehemently by that meanes which was giuen to restrayn it And it is in this sence saide of sinne that it is made by the lawe out of measure sinfull partly because by the knowledge of the law sinne which was hid before doeth now shewe it selfe to bee more grieuous and partly because by the restraynt of the law it doth rage more vnmeasurably Tim. What vse is to be made of this truth Sil. First to be humbled considering that wee carry such a poysoufull thing in our owne bosome Secondly to be very watchfull ouer our owne heart taking diligent heed vnto it least the in-bred venoune break out Thirdly to 〈◊〉 vs to pray vnto God in hearing the Law that our vicious nature abuse it or to the waxing worse thereby Lastly tobe thankfull 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Christ by whose soueraigne grace this malady is begun to bee cured in vs and shall be perfectly healed at the time of our dissolution by death Hitherto we haue seene three excellent vses of the Law first discouery of sin secondly life and blessednesse if it be obeyed also death if it bee disobeyed thirdly irritation and encreasing of sinne and of destruction this happeneth accidentally and is not of the Law it selfe as the two former DIAL X. Verse 14. For we know the Law is Spirituall Tim. VVHat doth this Text containe or whereunto tendeth it Sylas A reason for to proue why it is not to be reckned as a fault in the law if vpon the knowledge thereof there followes death because the law is spirituall but the Spirit is properly the cause of life and therefore it cannot bee properly the cause of death for one and the same efficient cause cannot by it selfe produce two contrary effects vnlesse it be in respect of a subiect diuersly affected as the Sun hardeneth clay and softeneth waxe Tim. In what meaning is the Law called spirituall Silas First because it is not giuen by men but God himselfe by his Spirit was the inditer of it Secondly because it reacheth not to the outward man onely but to the most inward motions of our minde and will requiring obedience from our very spirits and thoughts yea requiring a spirutually euen a perfect and Angelicall obedience in soule and body Thirdly because this inward obedience of the Law must come from that Spirit which is the author of the Law in these respects it is called spirituall But this property of Spirituall cannot be affirmed of the whole law For the ceremoniall law stood in bodily rites The iudiciall law did respect outward acts Therefore it is meant onely of the morall law the ten Commandements of which it may be affirmed that euery Commandement of it is spirituall striking at the roote and piercing euen the very soule and spirit of a man such is the nature of the world answerable to the nature of God who searcheth hearts and thoughts Heb. 4 12 13. Tim. What benefit are we to make to our selues from hence that Gods Law is spirituall Silas First heere we learne a difference betweene the ciuill lawes of men and the lawes of God the former take no knowledge of thoughts except they be vttered in words and actes the latter doth Secondly one may keepe all the lawes of men and yet be a very vicious and wicked person whereas Gods law teacheth to follow all vertue and to shunne all vice Thirdly it is not enough to conforme a mans selfe to Gods own law namely in outward actions onely without internall obedience Fourthly it reprooues such as thought the Law of Moyses to require no more then externall duties as the Pharisies expounded the Law See Math. 5. Fifthly it prooues to vs that the Law is vnpossible to bee kept of vs who cannot in this flesh attaine such exacte puritie and so reprooues the Papists who teach that we may merite by workes and doe more then the Law commands cuē works supererogatory Sixtly it helps to vnderstand the true meaning of the Law that in the forbidding or commanding of outward workes euill or good God forbids and commands the very first thoughts and desires of those workes Seauenthly it doth admonish all men as they would please God to haue more care about the ordering of the inward motions then of the outward actions Lastly it must warne vs with earnest prayer to craue helpe of God to strengthen vs by his Spirite to giue obedience to the Law in some measure of truth and sincerity Tim. What learne wee by this that the Apostle saith wee know that the Law is spirituall Silas It teacheth vs that this doctrine was not vncertaine and doubtfull but well and publikely vnderstood and knowne in the Church onely Secondly it reprooueth such as liue in ignorance of the nature of the Law which is a dangerous thing for it causeth men to rest content with outward ciuility and honesty of manners with neglect of the inward reformation of the heart which is the maine duty of a Christian as appeareth in the example of Pharisies Mat. 23 throughout Whereas Christians must exceed the righteousnesse of Scribes and Pharisies Math 5 20. and imitate Zachary and Elizabeth Luke 1 6. DIAL XI Verse 14. But I am carnall sold vnder sinne Tim. VVHat is the drift and purpose of this Scripture Silas In these words the Apostle doth confesse and bewaile his remaining natural corruption and so maketh
feare further destruction Secondly they were so displeased with the euils they did against the law that they had no care to doe the good commanded in the law as regenerate men haue and that out of conscience and obedience of the lawe and in one thing as well as in another Tim. But Herod was not onely displeased but he did good things Mark 6 20. Silas Herod was indeed displeased with his sinnes because hee feared the punishment and not because the lawe forbad it for then hee would haue put away Herodias his brothers wife haue repented of that main and grosse sin Secondly though he did good things yet not throughly for when the text sayeth hee did many things it implyes that hee neglected other things which were as needfull to bee done as those which hee did whereas the regenerate that consenteth to the law doth hate and repent of one sin as well as another and allowe one duty as well another though they perfectly neuer leaue any sinne nor doe any duty Tim. Yet it is reported of this Paul that when hee was a Pharisy and vnregenerate he was conuersant in all the righteousnes of the law without rebuke Silas All this is true and yet did not hee then consent to the lawe of God that it was good First because his conuersation was vnrebukeable outwardly before men alone his lusts and inward motions being vicious and sinfull before God Secondly the feare of men or the feare of punishment from God or both and not the loue of the law might and did moue him to be outwardly righteous Lastly hee was not stirred vp to the works which hee did by faith and charity either towardes GOD or man All things are quite contrary in the regenerate who content to the law of God both outwardly and inwardly and haue a pure heart cleansed by faith the ground and foundation of all that good they do Tim. Yea but euen regenerate men they do many euil things quite contrary to the lawe and doe leaue vndone sundry good things inioyned in the lawe and in those thinges which they doe best they come short to the perfection of the law how doe they then consent to the law Sil. Yes all this may be and stand very well together if men consider his conclusion set downe in the next verse which is that Paul as he was renued so farre his mind his will his affections did all allow the whole law and the euils which he did he was violently drawne vnto them by original sin which still remained in him Tim. Shew vs then when it may be sayde of a man that hee consents to the law Sylas When hee is so affected to the lawe as Dauid and Paul were not for degree but for sincerity of affection see Psal. 1 2. 119 14 15 16 18 30 31. Rom. 7 22 23. Tim. Nowe declare vnto vs what profit wee are to make of this doctrine Silas First wee haue from hence a notable difference betweene the godly and the vngodly the sincere Christian and the hypocrite for the vngodly man and the hypocrite when he doth any good or eschue any euill it is not from the heart because the law commaunds it for he euer hath respect vnto gaine or credit or pleasure or pain and not to the will of God but the godly though hee sin yet from his heart he loues the law hauing that in him which resisteth and hateth sin Secondly from hence we haue a special comfort vnto al such as consent to the law of God whose inward man delighteth in it and whose minde serueth it such surely are regenerate though they haue many fearefull imperfections and sinnes yet if they in trueth allow the law condemning those sinnes they doe and allowing those things they doe not because the law willeth them repēting from their harts so oftē as they violate the law through weaknes this is a certain mark of a new born child of God 〈◊〉 It sheweth how fearful their case is which are ignorant of Gods law either because they cannot or because they care not to know it These do not consent to the Law which they do not know and therefore are as yet in the estate of damnation Therefore it is a needfull thing together with the preaching of the Gospel to haue the Law soundly interpreted and applyed For as men cannot consent to the Gospell without the preaching of the Gospell which is the power of God to write it in our heart so we cannot so much as know the Law without the preaching of the Law Finally heere is a sure truth that whosoeuer willeth not the euil which he doth but disalloweth it out of a reuerent loue vnto the Law whereunto hee seeth the euill which he dooth repugnant he certainly approoueth the Law to bee good and a rule of rightnesse DIAL XIII Verse 17. Now then it is no more I that do it but sin that dwelleth in me Tim. VVHat doth this Text containe Silas A second conclusion inferred and gathered from the first combate betweene grace and corruption in the heart of Paul or betweene a good will and a bad deed the conclusion is thus much If I Paul do what I hate and what I would not do then I doe it not as I am renued but sinne dwelling in my Nature doth it by drawing me from good to euill whence it is too manifest that the force of sinne is yet great in me and that I truly complained in verse 14. Tim. What Instructions are we to learne from this Conclusion Silas That euery regenerate man is diuided into two men or into two parts that is himselfe and sin the new man and the old grace and corruption flesh the spirit the law of the minde and the lawe of the members The reason heereof is because in this life theit regeneration is vnperfect Secondly that a regenerate person takes his denomination from the better part that is from grace which raigneth in him not from sinne which doth but dwell in him Thirdly that part which is regenerate and renued in a man neuer sinneth but it is that part which is corrupt and vnrenued that sinneth doth euill Fourthly it affoords a plaine and euident marke to discerne a man that is regenerate from him that is not regenerate Tim. Before you doe particularly name the markes of a regenerate man set downe in this verse tell vs how many markes are contained in this Chapter whereby we may iudge of a regenerate man Silas There be seauen seuerall markes of the regenerate Children of God set downe in the latter part of this Chapter that is from the 14. verse to the end of it The first is to will that which is good and to hate sinne verse 15. The second to consent to the law that it is good and to delight in the sound knowledge and spirituall obedience thereof verse 16 and 22. Thirdly to haue an inward man that is such a man as is in secret and
the godly must fight against sinne with assurance of hope to ouercome in the end so they striue lawfully 2. The godly must bee so sure to ouercome as that they doe reioyce and triumph as if they had already ouercome Thirdly their trust to ouercome relieth not so much vpon their owne vertues workes and merites as vpon the mercies of God the Father by whose aide grace they looke certainly to preuaile Lastly their hope of helpe and aid from the mercies of God is grounded vpon the merites and grace of our Lord Iesus Christ and not vpon the law or good works or good conscience not these things but Christ hath appeased Gods wrath reconciled and continually pacifieth him Tim. What are we to learne from the last words Sil. First that Paul deuides himselfe into two parts mind and flesh not wholly flesh nor wholly the mind but partly the one partly the other Secondly that according to these two beginnings or grounds his purposes and endeuors were diuers for in his mind he serued the law of God to know and to do it and in his flesh he serued the law of sin that his corruption which still stuck in him did solicite him to euill and sometimes ouercame him Tim. What vse of this Sil. Snfull infirmity must keepe the Saintes from pride and their grace must stay them from despaire they cannot nor ought to be proud which carry sinne in their heart as a law neither neede they faint which haue grace for a gouernour in their mind Tim. What obserueye in this that he saith I my selfe Sil. First that he speaks of no other then himselfe Secondly that he speakes not in time past but present which serues to consute the Palagians and Libertines who take it so as if Paul spake all this from the 14. verse forward in the name and person of a meere natural man and had set forth no other fight but that which is between reason directing to things right and honest and affection or will drawing vnto thinges crooked and vnhonest as if Paul had in all this shewed himselfe an Arestotelian and not an Apostle extolling the power of nature and not the force of grace debasing and disgracing sensuality and not sin and birth-corruption which both in reason and will euen after regeneration vttereth force and great power like a mighty rebell striuing and fighting euen against the good worke of the Spirit in regenerate ones CHAP. VIII DIAL I. Verse 1. Now then there is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Iesus which walke not after the flesh but after the Spirite Timotheus WHat is the summe and scope of this eight Chapter Silas It doth conclude the doctrine of iustification sanctification of the faithfull through Christ amplifying and applying it to their comfort against temptations Tim. What be the parts of this Chapter Silas Two The first a doctrinall or exhortatory comfort against the secret corruption of nature or against the remainder of sinne and corruption still sticking and dwelling in the godly for though sin remaines yet it is not damnable to the godly This part continueth vnto the middle of verse 17. The second part containes a comfortable exhortation patiently to suffer afflictions for the name of Christ because their afflictions haue most equal and wholesome causes and most healthful effects This part continueth to the end of the Chapter Tim. What is the summe of this first verse Silas It doth propound and set downe the comfort against dwelling-sinne that albcit sinne doth abide in the godly yet condemnation doth not abide but is taken away Secondly a description of the godly negatiuely and affirmatiuely Tim. How is this comfort limited Silas Two wayes First by the circumstance of time and secondly of the persons It is declared by the circumstance of time thus Now that wee are iustified by faith and sanctified by the Spirite there is no condemnation to vs. Secondly the persons to whom this comfort doth belong are described by two conditions First that they are in Christ and secondly that they walke not after the flesh but after the Spirite Tim. But how doth this generall comfort belonging vnto all the godly depend vpon the former Chapter where Pauls particular conflict with sinne and his complaint against it was set out vnto vs together with his thanksgiuing for his deliuerance from it by Christ Silas Indeed one would thinke that vpon these premises he should haue inferred there is no condemnation to me but measuring all the godly by his owne sence feeling he doth enlarge the comfort propounding it more generally thus Now then there is no condemnatiō to such that are as I am This sheweth that he sustained the person of all regenerate men in the seauenth Chapter Tim. It is now time that we come to expound the words Tell vs therefore what is meant by Condemnation Silas A damnatory sentence of the law to wit that euery one is accursed that transgresseth it Or thus more plainely The sentence of God the Iudge of the world pronouncing guily and adiudging to eternall death such as transgresse the law Tim. What is meant by no condemnation Sil. Full and perfect freedome from this damnatorie sentence and punishment of death also that the godly that are thus freed from diuine condemnation and most dreadfull destruction are also accepted for righteous and worthie of eternall saluation through Iesus Christ nay there is not onely no condemnation but certaine saluation vnto such This may be collected to be the sence of these words thus Where there is no condemnation there is no wrath where there is no wrath there is grace where there grace there is neither sin nor death and where death is chased away there must needs be life and saluation Tim. What is that we are to learne from hence for our profit and 〈◊〉 Silas First we learne here a difference betweene the doctrine of the law and the Gospell and al other doctrines whatsoeuer which appeares herein that this doctrine of comfort can bee fetched and drawne from none other but from the doctrine of the Gospell Secondly it is a comfort that exceeds all other comforts to be exempted from condemnation and the wrath of God without the which men were in farre worser case then the bruite beastes because they liue securely without feare wheras men if they be without this comfort that they shall not bee condemned cannot but all their life long liue in a continuall feare of condemnation which must needs disquiet their hearts and rob them of al true contentment rest in their soules This comfort may be set forth by the comparison of a fellon or traitor which haue great comfort and quietnesse of mind being by the kings gracious pardon freed from deserued and sentenced death and of other malefactours liuing in dayly expectation of death to which they are adiudged without hope of pardon Tim. To whome may this comfort be most effectuall Silas Though it be very ioyfull
deeds 1. Thes. 5 17. Nehem. 2 4. Fourthly when they haue spoken or done any good thing they doe not returne the praise of it to God 1. Cor. 10 31. Lastly they are not resolued to suffer reproach and wrong for their profession and well doing Mat 10 37. Luke 14 27. Tim. Now shew vs who may be said to walke after the Spirite Silas Not they who haue some good desires and deeds but they whose course of life and actions for the tenour of them are euermore constantly ruled by the motion of Gods Spirit which they follow as their guide and leader as it is not a faire day wherein the Sunne shineth now and then if there be foule weather in the rest Tim. May not a man slippe and trip in his way sometimes yea stumble and fall and yet be saide to walke after the Spirit Silas It is right so because a spirituall or godly conuersation must not be iudged of by one or a few actions but by the tenour of it and as it holds and is for the most and greatest part otherwise none should be said to walke after the Spirite because there is none that liues and sinneth not Tim. What be the sortes of them that walke after the Spirite Sil. Two Some strong as Abraham Dauid c. some weake as the Apostles of Christ were before the ascension of the Lord. Tim. What be the markes of one that walkes after the Spirite Silas These two First an earnest desire both to know and to walke in the good way Secondly a sincere sorrow for his failing and fals and arising by repentance and the contrary to these fiue before mentioned Tim. What profit comes there of these things Silas First it reprooues such as boast that they are in Christ and yet shewe the contrary by their walking after the flesh Secondly it assureth them that walke after the Spirite that they are the very members of Christ. Finally it teacheth all men that sanctification of the spirite is an vnseparable companion and fruite of our iustification by faith moisture and water heate and fire light and Sun are not more firmely vnited then faith and holinesse DIAL II. Verse 2. For the law of the Spirite of life which is in Christ Iesus hath freed or deliuered me from the law of finne and of death Tim. WHat is the drift and purpose of this Scripture Silas It is a proofe and confirmation of the former verse and of the latter part of it as some thinke by a reason taken from the efficient and begetting cause of holy conuersation to wit the Spirite of Christ 〈◊〉 to the faithfull who hauing communion with Christ haue also fellowship with his Spirite But I rather take it to bee the proofe of the former part of the sentence confirming to vs that there is no condemnation to such as are in Christ which is confirmed by this reason because the Spirite of life which is in Christ the head being allowed vnto his members doth quite abolish sinne and death that though sinne remaine in them yet it shall haue no force to condemne them Tim. What then doe you thinke the summe and substance of this verse to be Silas This verse together with the three following is to be expounded of the third part of our iustification to wit of the perfect holinesse of Christs humane nature imputed to vs as the remedy and couer of our most defiled nature of the deliuery of our impure nature by the imputation of Christs sanctified nature Tim. What be the parts of this Text Silas The parts be foure First what that is whereby we are freed for the law of the Spirite c. Secondly what manner of thing this freedome is Thirdly to whom it doth belong Mee Lastly from what euils we are deliuered From the Law of sin and death Tim. Come to the words and tell vs what is heere meant by the spirit Silas Some by the Spirit do vnderstand properly the holy Spirit the third person in the Trinitie which gouernes and rules our minds by his inward motions as by a Law Others by it vnderstand the doctrine of faith or of the Gospell which is a Doctrine of the spirit and life Psal. 19 7. 2 Cor. 2. If we follow this exposition the meaning will be thus much that the Gospell or doctrine of faith doth free that is absolue and pronounce mee free from the Law of sinne and death that is from the guilt and condemnation that the Law of Moyses threatneth vnto sinners This then is a very godly exposition but not fit to this text that doth not at al speak of the law of Moyses which is no where in Scripture called the Law of sinne but forbiddeth it and commandeth wholsome and profitable things neyther doth he entreat heere of the efficacy and power of the Gospell and the doctrine of Faith which is neuer called the Law of the Spirit But I iudge Spirit to be put heere for the worke and efficacy of the Spirit to wit for the grace of Sanctification holinesse which is called a Law because it is like to a Lawe hauing power to gouerne and moderate And the word Life is added to shewe that the Spirit which worketh this is no idle and dead thing but a liuely viuifying quickning Spirit being the author both of an holy life and eternall life and that first in Christ the head for his sake and merit in the faithful his members That this is heere meant may appeare by the opposing and setting it against the law of sinne Vnder which must needes be comprehended corruption of nature being contrarie to holinesse Tim. I graunt then that by the spirit of life is meant the holinesse and purity of mans Nature as a worke of that quickening spirit which ruleth by a Law but whether take you it of holinesse inherent and wrought in our own Nature being regenerate or in Christ his humane nature as in the proper subiect Silas I do take this latter to bee true that it is taken of the Sanctification of Christ his nature My reasons be first because it is written not in vs but in Christ the law of the spirit of life which is in Christ. Secondly because Christ his Sanctification meriteth deliuerance from sin not our sanctification which is but a token and testimony of our purchased deliuerance Thirdly by the imputation of Christes sanctification this comfort that wee shall not be condemned is confirmed vnto vs. Lastly if we interpret it of our begun inherent Sanctification we shall further the rotten opinion of the Papists touching iustification by inherent grace See verse 3 4. Tim. What thing is that deliuerance or freedome which is heere spoken of Silas It is the very selfe-same that Iustification is to wit a full and perfect absoluing vs before the Tribunall of God from the whole guilt and punishment of sinne which comes to vs by the imputation of Christs Sanctification The reason heereof is because it is
written in the Preter tense or in the time past to signifie that our iustification is perfect in this life wheras when he speaketh of our vnperfect Sanctification he vseth a word signifying time to come Romanes 7 24. Who shall deliuer me c Tim. Who are the parties that are partakers of this freedom and deliuerance Silas All beleeuers without any difference of sexe age stature condition or nation whether Iew or Gentile Tim. Why then doth the Apostle vse this phrase saying Hee hath freed me rather then hee hath freed all the faithfull Silas First as hee set himselfe before an example of weakenesse and spirituall strife so now also of confidence and of the victory Secondly heere hee would teach all men to make application of this comfort vnto themselues saying and beleeuing Christ freed me there is no condemnation to me for this is the power of true faith to appropriate generall promises contrary to the Papists who will haue faith to be nothing else but a generall assent to the Scriptures without particular affiance in the promise of Christ. Tim. From what thing are we deliuered by Christ Silas From Sinne that is from our vnregenerate nature as it is corrupted by sinne Death also is ioyned to it because it makes vs guilty of and subiect to death and destruction which followes all kind of sin as the night followes the day and shadow the body Tim. What meaneth hee by putting this word Law vnto sinne Silas Because the guilt of our sinnefull nature is as a bond to make vs bound vnto eternall death Secondly because in such as are not regenerate it doth exercise a mortiferous tyrannical power and gouernment Tim. Now shew vs what benefit we may make of this whole verse thus expounded Silas It affoords vs an instruction a comfort reproose and confutation The instruction is that not onely Christ his obedience in his life and the sufferings in his death but the sanctificatiō of his humane nature is ours and is as verily belonging to the faithfull as if they had bin borne without sinne Secondly the comfort is that such as are in Christ may in all their temptations in life and death comfort themselues with this assurance that the sinnes neither of their actions nor of their nature shall euer be imputed to them Though they may oftentimes feele their wicked and rebellious nature stirre and resist Gods law yet such as doe resist the motions of sin yeelding themselues obediently to the motions of the Spirite are secured and made certaine that their remaining sinne shall neuer condemne them because Christ hath freed and deliuered them from it perfectly allowing them his owne sanctification to bee theirs It is a maruailous comfort to them that haue neede of it and can apprehend it Thirdly this doth reprooue the ignorant dissolute Christian who neuer thinkes what an euil his corrupt nature is nor is euer troubled with those euill motions and desires that suddenly spring from it full little doe they consider that the Sonne of God must descend from Heauen and humble himselfe to become a man that hee might free vs from the impurity of our humane nature And lastly it doth consute our blinde erring Papists of whom the very wisest of them neuer came so farre as to know that naturall concupiscence is a sinne in the regenerate and stands in neede of a Sauiour DIAL III. Verse 3. For that that was vnpossible to the Law in as much as it was weake because of the flesh God sending his owne Son in the similitude of sinfull flesh and for sinne condemned sinne in the flesh Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Text Silas It renders a reason to prooue that the most perfect holinesse of Christs humane nature called in the former verse the Spirit of life being imputed vnto beleeuers doth free them from sin and death that is from the remainder of sinne sticking still in their nature and the punishment of eternall destruction due to it This reason is taken from the end of Gods purpose in sending his Sonne to take mans nature into the fellowship of his person for he was sent to take flesh vpon him to helpe and succour the infirmity of our flesh Or more plainely thus Christ was sent of his Father to take the nature of man in the wombe of a virgin free from sinne by the worke of the Holy-Ghost to this end that he might restore our nature vnto such a perfection of righteousnesse as the exactnesse of Gods law doth require For though the lawe did teach a perfect righteousnesse both of nature and actions yet it is very vnable to bring vs there-vnto because wee doe lacke strength and power to performe and keepe it both before and after our regeneration From whence doth follow that seeing by the strength of the Law wee cannot attaine perfect righteousnesse and saluation with freedome from sinne and death because of the infirmitie of our flesh therefore it was of necessitie that Christ shold take our Nature full of holinesse to do that for vs which the Law could not do that is to destroy sin and death and to make them which by Faith lay holde on him so absolutely righteous as the Law requires For thus the case standeth that not onely our thoughts wordes and workes should be free from sinne and wholly vpright but also that our nature euen the verie faculties of our reason and will should be in all things conformable to Gods will reuealed in his Law as Adam was in his creation and according to that which is written Loue God with all thine heart c. Now because none no not the godliest do euer get this perfection while they are here their nature still remaining corrupt in part and rebelling against God Rom. 7 22. therefore all must needes haue perished except our nature had bin fully sanctified in the man Christ who is freely allowed to the faithfull to free them from condenmation Tim. Diuide the Text now into his seuerall parts Silas It hath these two parts First the end for the which God sent his Son into the world to wit that the infirmity or weaknesse of the Law by occasion of vs our sinne should be no let or hinderance to mans saluation Secondly what Christ Iesus did being sent come he did by sinne condemne sinne in the flesh Tim. What Law is meant heere and what is it that it cannot do Silas By Law is heere meant not the Ceremoniall but the Moral Law which is impossible to iustifie a man before God or to bestow perfect righteousnes vpon him as appeareth by the beginning of the next verse Silas Yet it was said in the seauenth Chapter that the law was ordained vnto life Tim. The Apostle sheweth there what it is able to doe in his owne nature and heere what it is not able to doe to vs that are sinners For the Law by Gods ordinance could iustifie vs and bring vs to life eternall Tim. But how
is it that the Law cannot iustifie and make vs righteous seeing it doth teach a perfect righteousnesse Silas It is true indeede that the Lawe instructeth vs fully both what is to be done and what is to be auoyded but there are 3. other things required to the iustifying of vs which it is impossible for the Law to do for vs. As first to offer vs forgiuenesse of those thinges wee do against the Law which accuseth but absolueth not Secondly to worke faith in vs to lay hold vppon forgiuenesse being offred which the law cannot engender Thirdly to put strength and power into vs that we may be able to keepe all the commandements of the Law to the end of our life All which things are impossible to the Law because it only instructeth what to do but ministreth no strength to do that it bids It promiseth life to the doers threatneth death to the transgressors but offreth no power to sinners much lesse giues faith to apprehend it for this is the office of the Gospell 2 Cor. 3 9 7 8. The cause why these things are impossible to the Lawe is because it is weake that is vneffectual and feeble for these purposes which commeth not from the Law but from our flesh and corrupt nature Tim. What doth the Flesh signifie heere Silas That naughtinesse and sinfull corruption that through Adams fall passed thorough all mankinde and doth remaine still euen in men regenerate but it is corrected and reformed in part in them and that daily til it be abolished Tim. What is the effect and fruite of this remaining corruption and sinne Silas It doth make the members of Christ and newe borne Children of God vnable perfectly and fullie to keepe the Law As first because through force of this remaining corruption they do diuers things contrarie to the Lawe Secondly they leaue vndone manie good things commanded by the Law Thirdly in the good things which they do there is much imperfection and vncleannesse therefore it is impossible to bee kept of the most righteous that is In our creation it was possible and in state of glorification shall bee but in estate of our vnperfect Sanctification it cannot be Tim. Is it not a wrong to God to say that he hath giuen vs a Law impossible to be kept Silas No none at all First because in our Creation we receiued strength to keepe it which we lost through our owne default Shall a Landlord be blamed because the Tenant is vnable to pay his rent Secondly because in the estate of glorification wee shall haue power to keep it perfect for then our knowledge and loue of God and our neighbour shall be perfect Thirdly because in the estate of regeneration the godly may be saide after a sort and in some sence perfectly to keep it For the regenerating Spirit hath begunne in them obedience to the Law giuing them strength to desire and endeauour it Also their wants and failinges in their obedience are pardoned and he is saide to haue no sinne when that is not imputed which is done And lastly the perfect obedience of Christ is allowed vnto the faithfull Omnia mandata Dei inquit August fact a deputātur quando quicquid non sit ignoscitur Ti. In what sence is it thē that the law is imposs ble to be kept Silas The wicked which are strangers from Christ are absolutely vnable to do any part of it but breake it thoroughout Rom. 5 8. Secondly the regenerate and godly they are not able by grace inherent in their own persons perfectly to do it but faile in many things and sundry wayes 1 Iohn 1 7 8. Iames 3 2. Tim. Declare vnto vs the profit that we are to make of this Doctrine touching the impossibility of keeping the Law being iustified by it Sil. First it conuinceth and confuteth both the Pelagians and the Papist the one because they teach that men by the strength of nature are able to keep the commandements the other that by strength of grace the godly are not only able to keep the Law but to do more then the Law requireth Secondly it serues to humble vs much that we cannot keepe the Law and that thorough our sinfull weaknesse also to stirre vs vppe vnto Prayer for grace to yeelde better obedience vnto it seeking that strength from God which wee haue not in our selues to be able in some measure to yeelde obedience to the Law Thirdly it instructeth all the faithfull to know that iustification before God is not to be had by good workes because they are imperfect not answerable to the rigour of the Law and are all stayned by the corruption of the flesh mingled with them Fourthly this doth teach vs that seeing we cannot haue iustification from the Law therefore all men must bee content to deny themselues and go out of themselues and seeke perfect righteousnesse in another to wit euen from the Sonne of God sent into the world that he may be made man for vs and the end of the Law for righteousnesse to all which beleeue Tim. What are we to learne from these words that GOD sent his owne Sonne Silas These three seuerall Lessons First the distinction of the persons in the Trinity for if the Sonne be sent from the Father of necessity he is a person distinct from the Father which confuteth Sabelius who held a distinction not of persons but of names Secondly that Christ is the sonne of God otherwise then we are euen his own sonne that is consubstantiall and coequall with the Father contrary to the Arrians who denied the eternall Godhead of the Sonne whome they make an inferiour second created God that is indeede not a God at all Thirdly hence we learne that when the high and soueraigne cause of our saluation is sought for wee may not stay in Christ himselfe but arise vp vnto the goodnesse of God the Father sending his Son which confuteth such as will haue foreseene faith and workes to be the mouing cause of appointing vs vnto saluation when as Christ himselfe is not the impulsiue moouing cause of appoynting vs vnto saluation but Gods owne loue moued him to giue and send Christ vnto vs Iohn 3. 16. Tim. What is the vse of this third and last lesson Silas It doth admonish all the faithfull that since God freely out of his loue sent his Son for them therefore it is their duty to send their harts vnto him wholly to bee his as men send mutually gifts one to another Rom. 12. 1. Tim. What is meant here by the similitude of sinfull flesh Silas The meaning is that Christ being sent of his Father became a very man hauing the true nature of a man being like to all other men except sin also by flesh is here meant humane nature consisting of body and soule being considered without corruption of sin Tim Why doth he say in the similitude of flesh Silas To teach vs that Christes manhoode not onely seemed and appeared but indeed
and vnregenerate men be enemies to God Silas By this reason because their flesh or corrupte nature neither is subiect to the law of God neyther indeed can be For such coniunction is betweene God and his law as to be enemy to eyther makes vs enemies to both Tim. What is meant heere by not being subiect to the law of God Silas Thus much the not yeelding and obeying the law of God but rather resisting rebelling or rising vp against it after an enemy-like fashion louing and practising that which Gods law forbids and hating and eschuing that which the law of God commands Tim. What will follow of all this Silas That they which are in the flesh that is to say carnall naturall men not renued by the Spirit of God such cannot please God but are voide of his grace beeing vnder death and damnation Moreouer from hence doth follow euen the very quite contrary as namely that the wisedome of the Spirite submitteth it selfe to the law of God being willingly subiect and obedient to it And therefore they which are in the Spirite endued with true holinesse by the worke of the Spirite they do please God and are his friends and be in his fauour free from condemnation and are in the way that leadeth to life and peace This contrariety and opposition the Apostle doth conceale eyther because it was manifest and plaine enough to bee vnderstood or for that the wisedome of the flesh and the wisedome of the Spirit doe not cause death and life after one sort and fashion For the former causeth death as an efficient and meritorious cause deseruing it in strictnesse of iustice the latter causeth life and peace as a way and meanes leading thervnto by Gods mercifull ordinance and as a cause without which no man can euer attaine happinesse in Heauen Tim. Hauing now opened and expounded the Text let vs heare what we are to learne from hence for our profit and vse Silas This present Text serueth and helpeth vs to confute errors to instruct vs in the truth to humble the pride of our nature and to comfort our feeble mindes The errors that are heere confuted are first such as restraine the wisedome of the flesh to sensuality thinking our appetite or sences onely to be enemies to God resisting his law whereas our very reason and will are defiled with sinne and be thereby turned against God and bent against his law Secondly the error of the Papists which condemne marriage of Ministers because it is saide such cannot please God which bee in the flesh Pope Syrtius so concluded and collected from this Text. Thirdly the error of the Manichees which thought that the very substance of the flesh and body was the worke of the Diuell and sinfull because it is written the wisedome of the flesh is enmity with God whereas flesh signifieth not our substance but the vicious quality of sinne cleauing to our substance Fourthly the error of the Pelagians and Papists touching free will of which they teach that it was able to loue God and to bee subiect to his law without grace or at the least being a little holpen by Gods Spirite it could refuse grace or receiue it if it list as the Papists teach whereas indeede our free will is dead in trespasses and sinnes an enemy to God and can no more without grace bee subiect to God to loue and obey his law or beleeue his promises then an enemy abiding so can or will loue his enemy and bee subiect to him Secondly the truths that are heere taught are these First that Sathans malice against mankinde is most extreame in that hee hath poysoned not onely the inferiour partes of our soule but the chiefe and most noble parts euen our reason minde and will yea the whole heart with the contagion of sinne Secondly that all men naturally are in a most wretched and most wofull estate being enemies and rebels to God proudly obstinately bent against him and he iustly against vs to destroy vs with eternall wrath as that subiect must needs perish that hath the King his enemy and that pot must needs be broken that fighteth against the Potter Thirdly this Text serues to humble vs by remembering and beleeuing that we were once in this wretched estate and haue in vs still some wisedom of the flesh rebelling against God Rom. 7 22 23. Lastly this Text serues to comfort vs thus If Christ by his death reconciled vs to God when by sin we were his enemies hee will much more preserue vs being reconciled to him Rom. 5 10. Also Rom. 8 32. The consideration heereof should prouoke all beleeuers to greater loue and thankefulnesse to Christ Iesus the greater his loue appeared in restoring vnto vs the friendship of God which we had lost by sinne DIAL IX Verse 9. Now ye are not in the flesh but in the spirit because the spirit of God dwelleth in you but if any man haue not the spirit of Christ the same is not his Tim. VVHat doth this Text containe Silas An application of the former doctrin vnto the beleeuing and Christian Romanes For that which he before had generally taught of the sanctification of the Spirite and of the desire and study both of spirituall and carnall men hee doth nowe particularly apply it to the Saints at Rome as his manner is The summe whereof is thus much That they which are after the flesh and carnall men sauour the thinges of the flesh wholly minding and caring for thinges that bee carnal and euill and so they with their course of life perish as enemies to God whereas spirituall men minde and care for spirituall and good things pleasing God as his friends and children From whence the Apostle doth gather that seeing the Romanes were not in the flesh but in the spirit spirituall not carnall men therefore they were none of Gods enemies but his friends and children being reconciled vnto him and pleasing him made partakers of his spirit and of his Son and therefore free from condemnation as he had vniuersally taught in the first verse of this Chapter Tim. What may we learn for our instruction from this preceeding and method of the Apostle Silas From hence wee learne the way of cutting and deuiding the word of God aright to be this namely first to propound doctrine generally setting it forth by similitudes confirming it by reasons Secondly to descend to particular applying it to the vse of euery Christian in the assembly for teaching confuting reproouing for exhorting and for comforting this application is the life and soule of doctrine and as a whetstone to set an edge on it it is frequent in scripture Tim. Now shew vs the seuer all parts of this text Sylas The parts bee two first a proposition in these words 〈◊〉 Romanes are not in the flesh it is set foorth by the contrary but ye are in the Spirit Secondly a confirmation of the things propounded by two prooses or
sinner this is the voice of euery mans owne conscience conuicting him of the breach of the law sundry wayes Now the conclusion followes necessarily Therfore I am a most accursed wretched man worthy of eternall damnation in hell fire This conclusion is the worke of the holy Spirite causing euery elect sinner to apply vnto himselfe the most horrible threatnings of the law whereuppon there ariseth in the conscience great feare horror and astonishment for which there is no salue in the law which is able to kill but not to make aliue Tim. But are all the elect partakers of this feare before their connersion and all in a like degree Silas All the elect which come to yeares and discretion are not conuerted without this feare but all haue not a like portion of it for God dispenseth the measure of this feare as it pleaseth him to some more to some lesse it faring with men in their new birth as with men in their naturall birth where some are borne more easily some with more payne as some sores are let out with the pricking of a pin and some need much lanching Tim. Tell vs what profite and vse wee are to make of this doctrine touching the degrees that are vsed in the conuerting of elect sinners Silas First we are taught how miserable we are by nature we being the children of Gods wrath and condemnation liuing alwayes as bondmen in fear of his punishment Eph. 2 1 2 3. Secondly we are taught how needfull it is to haue Gods Law soundly opened and applyed vnto vs seeing we haue not the Spirit of adoption till we haue the Spirit of feare and this is gotten by the ministery of the Law Thirdly we are warned what duties men are to do vpon the hearing and reading the Law that they may further their owne conuersion which be these First by the Law to get distinct and sound knowledge of sin Rom. 3 and 7 7. Secondly rightly to vnderstande what that curse is which the Law threatneth vnto sinne sinners Thirdly a diligent search and examination of our selues whether we be not guilty of these very sinnes against which the law denounceth the wrath and curse of God Fourthly Legall faith beleeuing that we are breakers of the Law and do deserue the curse of the Law Lastly vpon the application of the Law to our selues to labour and worke our owne hearts to get them humbled and broken with feare and terror of Gods iudgements For then and not before the heart is made meet to receyue the Spirit of Adoption Heere are reproued such as gather too much hope from the Gospell ere the Law haue duly feared and taken them downe with griefe shame Tim. Is there any other vse to bee made of this former point Silas Yea these three First they that had neuer any portion of this Legall feare haue iust reason to feare mistrust their owne conuersion Secondly if any bee vnder this discipline of the lawe hauing their conscience feared and troubled with the consideration of the condemnation due to their sinnes let them not bee much discouraged for they are in a good way to true conuersion Lastly let such as haue the spirit of feare not rest there but passe on till they haue the Spirite of Adoption least it fare with them as it fared with Esau Caine and Iudas Tim. What is the next degree of a Christians conuersion Silas To receiue the Spirite of Adoption Tim. What are we consider in this third degree Silas These three things First of Adoption what it is Secondly what is the Spirite of Adoption and thirdly what it is to receiue the Spirite Tim. What is Adoption and how may it be declared Sil. Adoption is the making one actually a son by grace which is no sonne by nature Ephe. 2 3. Gal. 4 4 5. For this word Adoption is borrowed from the custome of men who being Childlesse doe adopt and take to them of fauour the childe of another to bee their sonne This benefit of Adoption may be declared many waies First by the person of him who adopteth to wit God who hauing a naturall Son yet wanting sonnes in our kinde hath Adopted men woemen to be his Children which is not the wont among men but quite contrary Secondly by the persons of vs who are Adopted beeing both beggerly and void of all goodnesse being also his enemies full of all vnrighteousnes Rom. 5 6 7 8. Thirdly by the dignity of the thing it being a matter of wondrous excellency to haue such a sonne-ship more a thousand times then to be the sonne of a most mighty Prince Fourthly by the manifold and exceeding benefits which comes by Adoption namely to bee heire of the world and of Heauen Lastly by the duty of adopted ones being briefly touched in Malachy 1 6. and more largely in 1. Pet. 1 14 15. Tim. What is meant by the Spirite of Adoption Silas A speciall grace of the Spirite certifying our Adoption vnto vs. A grace which flowes from Adoption and is proper to Adopted ones seruing to witnesse their Adoption and therefore fitly called the Spirite of Adoption Tim. What be the two effects and fruites of the spirit mentioned in this Text Silas The first is to seale or assure in the hearts of the elect children of God the witnesse of their adoption by Christ hence it is called the Spirit of Adoption and in the same sence also it is tearmed the earnest of our inheritance Ephes. 1 14. The second is to open their mouths with childlike confidence and godly feruency to pray vnto God as to a most louing father Hence it is called by the Prophet Zachary the Spirit of Grace and of praier Zach. 12 10. Tim. How do the elect receiue the spirit of Adoption Silas By the Ministery and preaching of the Gospell as the Spirit of feare and bondage is giuen by the preaching of the Law Hence the Gospell preached is called the Ministry of life of righteousnesse and of the Spirit because through the Ministry of the Gospell the Spirit is effectuall to quicken the dead hearts of the elect thorough Faith in Christ thereby to be made righteous before God and to become his sonnes and heires of eternall life This is proued by the word of the Apostle Gal. 3. 2. This would I know receiued ye the spirit by the workes of the Law or by hearing Faith preached that is by hearing the Doctrine of the Lawe or by the doctrine of Christ apprehended by Faith Tim. But how and after what sort doth God worke in the Gospell when by it he will worke in his Children the Spirite of Adoption Silas The Spirit of Adoption is receiued into the harts of the elect by these degrees or seuerall works of grace First after the Conscience is humbled and terrified by the Lawe being brought to see and feele an extreame neede of Christ crucified there is engendered an earnest desire and longing after him and his merites such
people yet the greatest number of them shoulde not be deliuered from eternal destruction The reasons hereof bee first their generall vnkindnesse and vnthankefulnesse deseruing it Rom. 10 21. also verse 2. Secondly God had decreed to call and saue but a few of them as appcareth by the latter part of this prophesie verse 28. For to make his account and gather it into a short sum signifies not onely that God would lessen the number of the Iewes but that he did it out of his foreappointment his election and reprobation bearing the whole sway stroake in this thing For more could not bee called and saued then were elected and these were not many Tim. What is the vse of this doctrine Sil. First that euē in the visible Church al are not elect yea that the reprobates do in number exceede the elect Secondly that we must not bee offended with the fewnesse of the godly and great heapes of the vngodly for such was the estate of Gods people vnder the law Thirdly it teacheth that multitudes be no markes of the visible Church in all societies for the most part the best number is the least and the greatest the worst Tim. What is meant by the Lord of Hoasts Sil. The mighty God whose hoasts all creatures be executing his will as Souldiours the will of their Captaine Tim. What doth Seede signifie Silas A small number reserued as a little seed Corne out of a great heape that which is chosen for seede is much lesse then the whole crop Tim. What learne we by this comparison Silas First that Gods elect bee a precious people as the seede Corne is the best graine 1 Pet 2 9. which must engender in them a loue and comfort of theyr excellent estate euen vnder the Crosse and in others a reuerence towards them and it condemnes the world which iudge basely of them Secondly we learne that the godlie are exceeding fruitfull as seede bringes forth some thirtie some sixty some an hundred folde a sew Apostles conuerted whole nations to Christ Acts 2 41. Colos. 1 7 8. Rom. 1. Thirdly the number of the elect is the smallest number It is verie great considered simply Reuel 7 9. but small in respect of the damned Luke 12 32. Tim. What vse of this last point Sil. It admonisheth all men to striue most earnestly to finde themselues amongst this little slocke and to ioyne rather with a fewe that liue well then to doe ill with a multitude that ioyne together in euill Tim. What learne we from hence that God is saide to haue left this seede Silas To hold it for a great mercy of God that there be any that beleeue in him and feare him in so generall an apostacie as if in a deluge of water or generall fire one house or two should bee preserued in a great Citic Tim. What is meant by being like Silas Vtterly to be wasted destroyed as they were whereof reade Deut. 29. Gen. 18. Tim. What is our Doctrine from hence Silas That Gods owne people deserued as greeuous things as the Sodomites should he deale with them in Iustice because to other sinnes common to them both they doe adde contempt of grace and most grosse vnthankfulnesse in that being trusted with much they render but a little Also they haue stronger more meanes to keepe them from sinning and so their rebellions bee more grieuous This commends Gods meruailous patience in bearing with his people and admonisheth them of earnest and speedie repentance least his anger breake forth and his fire burne when none can quench it DIAL XIX Verse 30. What shall we say then That the Gentiles which followed not Righteousnesse haue attained vnto righteousnesse onen the righteousnesse which is of faith Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Text Silas To set downe more clearely by what meanes God brings both elect and not elect to their appointed endes of eternall life or death Hecreunto the Apostle is come by these degrees First he had saide that the promise of God depends vpon his election Secondly he had shewed the moouing cause of election and reprobation his owne absolute will and most free mercy Thirdly he had declared the ends of Gods predestination the glorye of his mercy in sauing of the one and of his power and iustice in destroying the other Fourthly hee had declared that the meanes to iudge of our election is by our effectuall calling Lastly that men may discerne when their calling is effectuall or not by faith or vnbeleefe which are those two meanes whereby that high counsell of God is executed as in this text is plainely to bee seene in the examples of faithfull Gentiles saued and vnfaithfull Iewes confounded Tim. What be the parts of this Text Silas Two First a question in these words What shal we say then Secondly an answere in the rest the answere also consists of two parts a double proposition and a double reason The first proposition is that the Gentiles found righteousnesse when they sought not for it the reason because they beleeued in Christ verse 30. Secondly the Iewes followed after righteousnesse but found it not the reason because they beleeued not in Christ but would be righteous by their owne workes verse 31 32. Tim. What signifies these words What shall we say Silas It is thus much Shall wee condemne God of vnrighteousnesse for reiecting so many Iewes that studied to please him and were his people calling the Gentiles that were Idolators and leud liuers and none of his people Tim. What are we to learne from these words Silas Two things First that mans corrupt reason will haue alwayes something to obiect against Gods truth for Paul had firmely proued both the calling of the Gentiles and the generall reiection of the Iewes by the Scripture and yet see how reason still goes on to iangle and quarrell Therefore let men pray God to reforme their reason for it is an enemy of Gods wisedome till grace haue renued it Rom. 8 8. and 12 2. Secondly from hence wee learne that the Ministers of Christ must bee able to foresee what carnall men can say against the trueth and to stop their mouthes this beeing one part of their function to conuince gainsayers Tim. Now come to the first part of the answere touching the Gentiles and tell vs what is meant by the Gentiles Silas All the people of the world which were not Iewes Tim. What is meant by righteousnes Silas The perfect iustice of works which God requires in his lawe or the performance of all such duties perfectly as the law commands Tim. In what sence are they sayed not to haue followed it Silas They neither loued nor cared for nor practised iust and righteous workes This may appeare first in that they could not because they were ignorant of Moses law much more ignorant were they of the righteousnesse of Christ. Secondly as for the law of nature they were also transgressours of that being both
strectes or blockes in the high way and thus will God try our stability Tim. But what else is to be learned from hence Silas That the force of incredulity is such as can alter the nature of things and make Christ the worde sacraments Ministers creatures and benefits yea God himselfe who all be good to become occasions of the greatest euill As nothing is so euill but Gods infinite goodnesse and wisedome can draw good out of it as out of mans fall and Iudas treason and the Iewes abiection So nothing is so good but mans sin can make it pernitious and hurtfull to him euen Christ to bee a stumbling stone Tim. What learne we by this that God laide this stone Silas That nothing falleth out in the world or in the Church but by the decree and appointment of God Tim. What doth this teach vs that this stone is laide in Syon in the visible Church Silas That more miserable is the case of vnbeleeuing Christians then of other Infidels because by falling on Christ they deserue to haue him fall vpon them with more waight of vengeance they which heare the doctrine of Christ and receiue it not haue the greater sinne Iohn 9 41. Iames 3 2. Woe Corazin c. and it shall be easier for Sodome then for Caparnaum Tim. But was this Gods purpose to make men stumble by laying this stone in their way Silas God indeed had set Christ to be the rising and fall of many Luke 2 34. A stone precious to such as beleeue but a rocke of offence to disobedient ones 1. Pet. 2 6. But this is to bee imputed to the wickednesse of men who turne to their destruction that which might haue been to their wealth howbeit this is certaine that howsoeuer God delight not in the stumbling and vnbeleefe of reprobates as their contumacy is a sinne yet as it is a punishment of former sinnes and a meane to manifest his iustice he hath willed and determined it Tim. What more is to be learned from verse 33 Silas That vnbeleeuers are in a most miserable 〈◊〉 because they refuse Christ out of whom nothing is to be lookt for but confusion and death eternall Secondly that most happye are such as haue founde mercy to beleeue because they shall enioy the thing in which they doe beleeue and therefore shall not be put to confusion Whereas such as through vnbeleefe make hast to be iustified by their owne merites shall misse of true righteousnesse whereof will follow extreame confusion Men which run headlongly without looking what is in their way doe stumble and take harme yea sometime to their vndooing So it fareth with all vnbeleeuing persons which hasten vnto saluation by their owne running and working not thinking of Christ to become righteous through faith in him they doe misse of that they shotte and aymed at and meete with extreame confusion Finally once for all I note it that in the disputation of righteousnesse by works or by faith heere in the end of this Chapter and in the beginning of the next as in ver 3. and in the 3 4 5. Chapters of this Epistle it is at any hand to be taken heed of that wee vnderstand no other faith but that which worketh by charity Gal. 5. which purifieth the heart Acts 15 9. which hath vertue and godlinesse ioyned with it 2. Pet. 1 6 7. which hath repentance for a necessary companion and fruite Acts 20. 21. which is shewed by works Iames 2 18. For though wee teach that onely faith iustifieth yet this iustifying saith is not alone but as a Queene is attended with a traine of Christian graces As I obserue this in behalfe of the Papists which falsly charge vs to set foorth to the people in our bookes and Sermons a bare barren idle and dead faith so in regard of certaine other Heriticks Seruetus executed at Geneua and Sorinus and Harminius Bertius who of late troubled the Churches in Holland Zeland I further note that wee eschue as a Shelfe or Rocke their dangerous if not blasphemous conceite that faith properly taken or the act and worke of beleeuing doth iustifie vs and is accounted to the beleeuer for perfect righteousnesse with God as if in his owne person he had done the law fully which erronious conceite crosseth the exposition of all Christian Churches and Diuines expounding this proposition we are iustified by faith figuratiuely Faith by a Metonimie or Metalepsis put for the obiect Christ applied by faith and all those plaine Scriptures which say the obedience of one man made vs righteous Rom. 5 19. and Christ is made to vs of God righteousnesse 1. Cor. 1 30. and wee are made the righteousnesse of God in him not in vs in our faith 2. Cor. 5 21. and Christ the end of Law not faith for righteousnesse Rom. 10 4. And fighteth also with such texts as make equipollent these propositions a man is iustified by faith and a man is iustified by the blood of Christ by the redemption of Christ Rom. 3 23 24 25. Lastly it is repugnant to all sound reason for faith or to beleeue it is a worke and all works vniuersally both of Law and Gospell bee excluded from iustification as works also it is but one part of legall iustice to beleeue God ergo not our whole iustice yea it is vnperfect contaminated with ignorance doubting c. How then can it absolue vs before the most iuste Iudge CHAP. X. DIAL I. Verse 1 2 3. Brethren my hearts desire and prayer to God for Israell is that they might be saued For I beare them record that they haue the zeale of God but not according to knowledge for they being ignorant of the righteousnesse of God and going about to stablish their owne righteousnesse haue not submitted themselues to the righteousnesse of God Timotheus WHat is the purpose of this present Chapter Silas To proue his distinction of a double righteousnesse first by the law and secondly by faith mentioned in the former Chapter verse 30 31. and in verse 3 4 5. Secondly he intendeth to proue that the righteousnesse of the law doth no whit auaile the Iewes before God but that it is the righteousnesse of faith that doth stead vs vnto eternall life verse 6 7 8. c. Thirdly to shew that this righteousnesse was to be preached and offered no lesse to the Gentile then to the Iew by the Apostolicall Ministry which God appointed to be the onely outward instrument of this righteousnesse verse 11 12 13 14 15. c. Lastly to set foorth the entertainement which this righteousnesse of faith found in the worlde The Gentiles through free and effectuall vocation of God receiuing it The Iewes through vnbeleefe and obstinacy refusing it and therefore being iustly refused and reiected of God verse 18 19. c. Into these soure things as into parts may this present Chapter be distinguished Tim. How doth the Apostle prepare himselfe an entrance and a way to the handling
vs that that to our good intentions wee ioyne good ends and to our good endes good meanes that all may bee good not making our owne or other mens opinions and affections the rule of our meaninges except they agree with the rule of the Scriptures euen with Gods minde contained therein without the certaine cleare knowledge whereof thorough the enlightning of the holy Ghost euen out praiers our preaching our thankesgiuing and receiuing the holy mysteries or other duties of religion and Righteousnesse with whatsoeuer good meaning wee seeke to do them they are turned into sinne beeing I say not done by knowledge and obedience of the will of GOD therein Rom. 14 23. 1 Tim. 4 3. DIAL III. Verse 3. For they being ignorant of the Righteousnesse of God and going about to establish their owne Righteousnesse haue not submitted themselues vnto the Righteousnesse of GOD. Tim. WHat is perfourmed by the Apostle in this verse Silas These two thinges First the faults of the Iewes zeale are heere more distinctly and plainly laid downe as first their ignorance of the righteousnesse of God Secondly from thence did spring pride out of opinion of their owne righteousnes Thirdly their pride engendred contempt of the grace righteousnesse of Christ. The second thing is the 2. maine part of this Chapter to wit the distinction of righteousnesse into two parts the righteousnesse of God and our owne righteousnesse Tim. What is meant heere by ignorance Silas Not barely the want of knowledge but the not knowing of such things as the Iewes being Gods people were bound to know For the righteousnesse of GOD was reuealed in Scripture hauing witnesse from the Lawe and Prophets and taught in the Assemblies and a thing verie needefull to bee knowne as that wherein mans felicitie doth consist for Righteousnesse and blessednesse are alwayes ioyned and annexed together vnseparably Psal. 32 1. Hab. 2 4. The lust shall liue by Faith Tim. What signifies the righteousnesse of God Silas The righteousnesse of God is threefold first his vniuersall iustice which requireth in Angels and men perfect purity outward and inward in all poyntes according to the exact 〈◊〉 of the law Secondly particular correctiue iustice whereby hee eternally reuengeth and punisheth sin sinners without pardon in Christ Rom. 3. 5. Thirdly that which Scripture calles the righteousnesse of Christ and offaith Romaines 3. 22. and 10. 6. In all these three sorts of righteousnesse the Iewes were ignorant although the third bee heere meant principally which is called the righteousnes of God because it is giuen appoin ted and approued of God Tim. What are we to gather for our instruction from the first words being thus expounded Silas That it is a sinne to bee ignorant of God or his righteousnesse The reason is because wee haue a commandement from God to seek the knowledge of him and that which pleaseth him Exodus 20. 3. 1. Chro. 28. 8. Destruction is threatned to the ignorance of the Gospell Tim. But is there no difference in this sin of ignorance are all ignorant persons alike sinners Silas No not so their ignorance is the lesse sinnefull which want meanes of knowledge as the Turkes and the Pagans but these Iewes here spoken off had Moses and the Prophets therefore their ignorance was the greater sinne Tim. What vse hereof Silas It shewes them to be deceiued which thinke to bee excused before God by their ignorance of his will whereas none no not simple ignorance can excuse any for he must be beaten who knoweth not his masters wil much lesse affected and wilfull ignorance Secondly it exhorts all Christians as they will auoyde the guilt of sin and condemnation to labour for the knowledge of God and his righteousnesse for herein stands eternall life to knowe God and Christ Iesus Iohn 17 3. and Christians should account all things as dung in respect of the precious knowledge of Iesus Christ. Phil. 3. 8. Tim. What other thing collect we from these words Silas That where there is the ignorance of God and his righteousnesse there can be no true zeale for God for in all right zeale the thing which is earnestly loued must be distinctly knowne of him that loues it Tim. What profit is to be made of this poynt Silas It proueth the zeale of supersticious Papists and blind Protestants to be vicious and dissembled for whatsoeuer earnestnesse they shew as they can be very holy and earnest about things pleasing to God and belonging to his glory as they thinke yet all that is nothing lesse then true zeale so long as they are ignorant of GOD and his word also it shewes the cause why nien lacke good zeale to wit ignorance it is the mother of an erronious zeale Tim. What doth accompany this their ignorance Silas Arrogancy and haughtinesse of minde in that they sought to establish their owne righteousnes Tim. What is meant by their owne righteousnes Silas The righteousnes of the lawe or of workes inherent in themselues and consisting in their own labours and working either before grace by strength of nature or after grace by the Spirite whereby they thought to merite Gods fauour and eternall life as the Pharisie Luke 18. Tim. What are we to learne from hence that Pride accompanieth ignorance Silas First the falsehood of that Popish principle that ignorance is the mother of deuotion whereas indeede it is the Parent of errour and presumption Secondly we see what a dangerous matter it is to be ignorant of God and Christ for such doe not take themselues to be in that sinfull and damnable estate and to haue neede of Christ his sufferings and obedience but that by their owne workes and seruing of God they shall bee saued well enough as these Iewes thought which is a pride most execrable The nature whereof is to make a man to seeke for all felicity in himselfe and not to bee beholden to any other for any thing rather chuse to perish then to receiue the righteousnes of Christ as beggers doe almes Tim. What is meant here by establishing Silas To erect set vp and make to stand whereby is implyed that mans owne righteousnesse is very weak like a dead corps or one that lyeth bed-rid or a baby made of clouts For as in vaine we goe about to set vp these or to make them to stand so mans own righteousnes by works is vnable to stand before the exact iudgement seat of God Psal. 130. 3. 4. Dan. 9. The reason is because the woorkes which men doe before grace are sinfull and offend God seeing they be not done out of saith Rom. 14. Secondly the works which follow faith are imperfect and therefore cannot please God and merit his fauour And lastly euen our best workes are but the fruites and effects of our iustification and therefore can be no meritorious causes of it Tim. Whereunto must this knowledge serue vs Sil. That we beware
First it signifieth determination or ending of a thing as Mat. 24 3. Secondly it signifieth the mark whereunto any thing aimeth as 1 Pet. 1 9. Thirdly it signifieth perfection or accomplishment as Ro. 13. Loue is the end of the Lawe Fourthly that for whose sake or cause any thing is appointed The word End in this text may well beare all these four significations but the two last especially For Christ hath determined the ceremoniall Law for signification and practise and the Morall Law for curse and extreame rigour Also he is the marke at which the whole Old Testament to wit both Law Prophets aymed for they bare witnesse to Christ Ro. 3 21. Thirdly Christ is that which is intended in the Law and for which the Law is appointed Lastly hee is the perfection of the Law inasmuch as he hath exactlie in euery point perfourmed it bearing the punishment due to the breach and yeelding due obedience Tim. But declare vnto vs more particularly in what respects Christ is the perfection of the Law Silas First in respect of his integrity and puritie of his Nature being conceiued without sinne Math. 1 18. Luke 1 35. Secondly in respect of his life and actions being wholly conformed to the absolute righteousnesse of the Law 2 Cor. 5 21. Thirdly in respect of the punishment which he suffered to make satisfaction vnto Gods Iustice for the breach of the Law Col. 1 20. To which may be added that hee hath purged the Lawe from the corrupt glosses of the Pharisics Math. ch 5 6. Lastly he reneweth it causing his members heere to beginne and in heauen to fulfill the obedience of it Tit. 3 5. 6. Tim. What is the summe of the first part of the 4. 〈◊〉 Silas Thus much whereas God gaue vs the Lawe of the ten Commandements to be a Law of perfect righteousnesse and men thorough weakenesse are vnable to keepe 〈◊〉 therefore Christ is now made the perfection of the Law for that Christ hath made perfect and full that which the Law coulde not for it could not pardon our sinnes nor giue vs power to fulfil it but Christ hath done both these by application of his obedience and sufferings to beleeuers Tim. What Doctrine ariseth from this verse thus explained Silas First whosoeuer desireth perfect righteousnesse and eternall life must come to Christ who is therefore called our righteousnesse 1 Cor. 1 30. 2 Cor. 5 21. The reason heereof is because perfect righteousnesse such as is required in the Lawe and to which eternall life is due is to be found in the man Christ onely and in no other humaine creature whatsoeuer and this commeth to passe not by any defect in the Law which is a worde of life and ordained to giue life Rom 7 14. but by our owne default who cannot thoroughlie obey it Rom. 8 3. Tim. What profit is to be made of this Doctrine Silas It conuicteth those of error which will bee Iustified any other way either in whole or in part saue by Christ onely for since nothing that men do or can doe before or after grace can be saide to be Christ Christ alone is our righteousnesse therefore to trust in anie thing for righteousnesse is to make that a Christ and so to renounce him Secondly it teacheth that true Christian people be the onely happie men and onely Christian religion to bee the onely true religion because it alone teacheth the Doctrine of Christ and of righteousnesse by him therefore all other professions besides Christianity directly leades to perdition whatsoeuer shewes they haue Turcisme Papisme Paganisme c. are false and deceitfull religions Tim. What is the next Doctrine Sil. That the chiefe office and dutie of the Lawe is not onely to giue knowledge of our sinnes and to bee a direction for our life and manners but to direct vs vnto Christ as vnto the proper end thereof in respect whereof the law is tearmed our Schoole-Maister to Christ Gal. 3 24. Tim. But how doth the Lawe direct and bring vs vnto Christ Silas Not directly and ofit owne nature for so it threatens vs with death for euery disobedience promiseth eternall life no otherwise then vpon perfect obedience which wee vtterly want but indirectly and by accident namely by shewing out sinnes accusing condemning vs therefore it compels vs to despaire of our getting righteousnesse and life by our owne obseruing of the Lawe driuing vs by that meanes out of our selues to seeke vnto Christ for the pardon of our sinnes and to be accounted perfectly iust by his obedience imputed vnto vs. For as a glasse by shewing vs the blots in our face warnes vs to wipe them out and a sicknesse being knowne and felt enforceth vs to the Physition for helpe and as hunger and wearinesse compels vs to looke out for meate and rest so the law by opening our guiltinesse and terrifying our conscience by denouncing punishments makes vs run to Christ for remedy that wee may bee iustified by him laide holde on and receiued by a true and liuely faith Tim. What profit of this doctrine Silas First it argueth all such of great foolishnesse as seeke to be iustified by the workes of the law for that is instead of a Schoole-Maister to make it a father and a redeemer vnto vs. Secondly it doth admonish vs how we may become profitable hearers of the law to wit by learning from the law being rightly expounded not our sinnes alone and the iudgements due vnto them but by considering Christ to bee our redeemer and deliuerer from sinne and the curse due to them Therefore such are here iustly to be reprooued as vpon hearing of the law preached do sticke in the knowledge of their sinnes and the feare of Gods wrath due to them whereas they should be led forward thereby to see and seele a great need of Christ that they may seeke after him to obtaine pardon of their sins also righteousnesse and eternall life by him as a man that is wounded or one that is sicke runnes to the Physition for reliefe and helpe so the law reuealing sinne and death should whip to Christ. Tim. Come to the second part of this text and tell vs what doctrines we are to learne from thence Silas First that Christ together with his righteousnesse are receiued not by any workes but by beleeuing as it is heere written to him that beleeueth Secondly we learne that the righteousnesse of Christ is offered and giuen not to the beleeuing Iewes alone but to all elect Gentiles also which shall beleeue in him as it is written to euery one that beleeueth Tim. What followes heerevpon Silas These two things First that the difference betweene the Iew and Gentile vnder the law is now taken away by Christ vnder the Gospell Secondly heere is great matter of comfort for all faithfull persons whosoeuer how weake soeuer their faith be so it be true for vnto such their
sinnes done against the law shall not be accounted and the righteousnesse which Christ hath done shall bee imputed vnto them as their owne to bee full and true blessednesse Whosoeuer hath found mercy to beleeue in Christ hee is freed from the malediction of the law his sinnes cannot hurt Moses cannot condemne him nay he is Lord ouer the law sinne hell and death beeing through Christs righteousnesse heire of life DIAL V. Verse 5 For Moses thus describeth the righteousnesse which is of the law that the man which doth these things shall liue thereby Tim. FRom what booke of Moses is this testimony fetched and what is the summe of it Silas The testimony is fetched out of Leuiticus 18. verse 5. The summe where of is thus much that whosoeuer perfectly keepeth the whole law shall haue that righteousnesse vnto which as a due debt belongeth eternall life So as heere in these wordes is a compact betweene God and man God promiseth eternall life so as men do his starutes perfectly this is the couenant of workes made with Angels and men in their creation and repeated in Scripture to force vs to Christ. Tim. To what purpose is this testimony cited Silas First to prooue that there is a righteousnesse of workes as well as of faith Secondly to proue that it is impossible for any meere man to haue this righteousnesse of workes because the condition vppon which the righteousnesse of the law doeth depend is not possible to bee fulfilled which is this to doe the whole lawe in euery poynt it being a thing which farre surpasseth the infirmity of mans nature and therefore we may not seeke either righteousnesse or eternall life by the works of the law but by faith in Christ Iesus Tim. Now come to the wordes and tell vs what is meant by describeth Silas Thus much to set foorth a thing in so plaine and cleere manner as that it may be well perceiued and vnderstood as a thing painted in liuely colours to be seene Tim. What is meant by the righteousnes of the law Silas That 〈◊〉 ousnesse which the lawe morall teacheth and describeth which elsewhere is called our owne righteousnes or the righteousnesse of woorkes because it sticketh in our selues and standeth in working after the law and not in beleeuing the Gospell Tim. What lesson are we to learne from the first part of this verse being thus explained Sil. That all such texts of Scripture as do teach workes and promise life vnto them they belong vnto Moses and are part of Moses law though they be written in the newe Testament as namely those words of Christ to the young man Math. 19. 17. If thou wili enter into life keepe the commandements also Rom. 2. 6. 7. and 13. For the Gospell requireth workes as truites of faith not as merites of righteousnes and life Tim. What vse is to be made of this poynt Silas It helpeth vs to distinguish betweene the sentences of the law and of the Gospell for the Gospell doth often promise life eternall and saluation to repentance and good works but not as they are performance of the law but as the tokens and fruites of a liuely faith whereby the promise of eternall life is apprehended Tim. Now go forwards and shew vs what is meant by doing he that doth Silas To doe signifies to keepe and performe exactly and most perfectly without any the least faylings at any time for here the sentence is legall but when the sentence is Euangelicall then to doe signifies no more but to desire to take care and to endeuour to doe what wee may and what lies in vs as Iohn 13. 17. If ye knowe these things happy are ye if ye do them Tim. What is meant in our text by these things Silas The statutes and lawes of God as appeareth by the 5. verse of the 5. chap. of Leuit. Tim. Of what life doth this text speake Silas Not of a temporall life only as some vnderstand it but of eternall life also which appeareth by comparing this place with Mat. 19. 17. For as the law threatneth death eternall to euery transgressour so it propoundeth life both temporall and eternall to the perfect keeping of it vnto which is required these three things First that all the statutes of the law of God be kept the little as well as the great Secondly that they be kept with the whole heart the whole minde and the whole strength Thirdly that they be kept all our whole life long vntil the last gasp and yeelding vp of the Ghost Deut. 27. 26. Math. 22. 37. Gal. 3. 10. Tim. Tell vs nowe what instructions wee are to learne from the latter part of this verse Silas First that the righteousnesse of the law is a performance of perfect obedience Secondly that this perfect obediēce cannot be obtained of any man in this life Thirdly that no man must looke to haue eternall life by his workes of the Law for it is written hee that doth them shall liue thereby but none doth them therfore none shall liue by them And note this that righteousnesse and life are denied to come by the law in respect of vs who doe it not Tim. But how may it be proued that there is none that doth the workes of the law perfectly Silas Vnregenerate men cannot doe them for they are euill from their youth vp Gen. 6 5. and 8 20. neither regenerate men can fully doe them for in many things we sinne all lames 3 2. 1. Iohn 1 8. Tim. If Gods law be not possible to be kept then it should seeme that the promise of life made vnto it is ridiculous and idle Silas Nay not so for it was once possible to obey perfectly in our creation Secondly the keeping of the law is possible to Christ though it bee not to vs who yet haue title to eternall life by Christs fulfilling of it Thirdly the elect by grace in this life are made able in some measure ro keepe it and shall be able to doe it perfectly in the life to come when they shall loue God and their neighbour with all their heart Tim. What vse is to bee made of these doctrines concerning our great vnablenesse to haue righteousnesse by the Law Silas First it confuteth such as looke for eternall life by the workes of the Law which indeede can minister nothing but death to vs sithence wee cannot keepe it For as it promiseth life to the dooers so it threatneth death to him that failes but in one point and what man liuing is he that sinneth not Secondly it serueth to humble vs in as much as by our owne fault we are made vnable to doe the works of the law in that perfection that it requireth for that it cannot giue vs righteousnesse and life it must bee imputed to a weakenesse in our selues and not to an insufficiency in the lawe Rom. 8 3. Thirdly it sendeth all men
euen the best out of themselues and enforceth thē to goe to Christ for righteousnesse and life eternall by beleeuing that he hath fulfilled the law for vs by his obedience and death and this is indeed the right meditation of the doctrine of the lawe when it schooleth and swindgeth a sinner vnto Christ to fetch from him alone righteousnesse and saluation Now heereby shall wee know that the preaching of the righteousnesse of the law hath driuen vs to Christ First if we trust not to the workes of the law to seeke life by the merite thereof in whole or in part Secondly if wee striue to order our workes according to the leuell of the law making it the rule of our Christian life still suing to Christ for pardon of faults Lastly learne hence that if the righteousnesse of the law hauing promise of life do consist in doing thinges commanded in all perfection therefore Christ cannot be the end of the law for tighteousnes vnlesse beside the passion of his death there be allowed vnto beleeuers his actiue obedience and integrity of life that in him wee may claime life as well as escape death DIAL VI. Verses 6 7 8. But the righteousnesse which is of faith speaketh on this wise Say not in thy heart who shall ascend into heauen that is to bring Christ from aboue or who shall descend into the deepe that is to bring Christ from the dead but what saith it c. Tim. VVHat is the scope of this Text Silas As before he described the righteousnes of the law out of Moses so now by an antithesis out of Moses he setteth foorth the righteousnes of faith by the effects obiects and properties plainely shewing that it driueth away doubting and feare frō the conscience leaneth vpon the word of promise beeing possible easie and certaine and in all these it is quite opposite vnto the legall iustice Tim. Declare now plainely the summe of this Text. Silas It is thus much that the righteousnesse of faith neyther leaueth the conscience doubtfull of saluation nor striketh in it any feare of condemnation but staying it selfe vpon the manifest and sure worde of the Gospell concerning Christ dead for our sinnes and risen againe for our righteousnesse it engendereth firme quietnesse in the hearts of beleeuers and draweth free confession from their mouth of Christs death resurrection and ascension Tim. What be the parts of this Text Sil. Two the first negatiue shewing what faith speaketh not or forbiddeth with the cause and reason why verse 6 7. The other affirmatiue teaching what it is that faith faith and what manner of thing it is Tim. What doth faith forbid and why Silas All doubting about eternall life in heauen vpon this ground because Christ is ascended thither for vs. Secondly it forbiddeth all trembling and feare of beeing tormented in hell vpon this reason because Christ being dead hath by his death ouercome eternall death not for himselfe but for his members Tim. Come wee to the words and tell vs what is meant by the righteousnesse of faith Silas That which before in verse three is called the righteousnesse of God standing wholly in beleeuing or the righteousnesse of Christ being laid hold vpon by faith or a person iustified by faith in Christ it is no matter which of these we follow Tim. But how may this righteousnesse bee saide for to speake Sil. By a figure called Prosopopoia as Rom. 8 19 20. Paul putteth a person of a reasonable creature vpon the iustice of faith and bringeth it in speaking and declaring it selfe what manner of thing it is and what it works in beleeuing hearts Tim. What may we learne from these first words Silas That a liuely faith is necessarily required as an instrument to receiue true righteousnesse before God Secondly whosoeuer is indued with this faith hath that righ teousnes which God alloweth of in iustice not that faith as it is a quality a worke or guift is this iustice but because God imputeth to faith the iustice of his Son Christ which alone is able to appease him and to abide the rigor of his law which faith as a worke cannot doe Tim. What may wee learne by this that Paul confirmes the doctrine of free righteousnesse by faith out of Moses his writings Silas That Paul the Apostle and Moses writings had good agreement in the doctrine of the Gospell Secondly that the righteousnesse of faith hath witnesse from the law and the Prophets Thirdly that Moses knew and preached the Gospell as well as the Law hence it is that Moses lawe doeth oftentimes signifie the whole doctrine of God as Psal. 19. 7. Tim. Why then is Moses accounted a Preacher of the lawe and set against the Apostles and Christ the preachers of the Gospell Iohn 1. 17. Silas Moses had this denomination of that which hee did for the most part and that was to publish and expound the lawe to the people howbeit the promises of grace are contayned in his writings also he prophesied of Christ Iohn 5. 46. For Moses wrote of mee euen as Christ and his Apostle did preach the law and vrged repentance Marke 1. 15. Yet because their chiefest endeuor was to set forth the promises of grace they are therefore called the Ministers of grace and dispencers of the Gospell Tim. What vse of this poynt Silas It serueth to draw the Iewes the sooner to embrace the righteousnes of faith since it was taught by Moses a Prophet whome they much honoured and respected and yet refusing to beleeue in Christ euen for that they thought therby to be drawn away from this Moses wheras Paul tels them that there is no such matter if they would beleeue Moses but contrariwise they must receiue Christ whome hee preached as Iohn Baptist so Moses prepared Disciples for Christ the one more the other lesse clearely Tim. But how may it appeare to vs that Moses in this testimony did speake of Christ and the Gospell Silas First out of Moses wordes Deut. 30. 6. 11. the promises of conuersion to God and circumcision of the heart are parts of the Gospell and this was the commaundement and not the legall precepts which that day hee spake Secondly out of Paul who in this place tearmeth the word which Moses spake to be the word of faith verse 8. Thirdly if Paul had vsed this text of Moses by allusion agreement or proportion onely as if such wordes as were spoken by Moses touching the law might fitly be applied by Paul to the Gospell then had they not serued the purpose of the Apostle which was to confirme by testimony of Moses that which hee had spoken before touching Christ being the end of the law for righteousnesse to him that beleeues They are then deceiued which think that Paul alludeth to Moses citing him by way of consequence and not directly or that he doth speake of the bare knowledge or performance of
our selues he working in vs both will and deede Ephes. 2 10. Phil. 2 13. but this righteousnesse of Faith is easier in regard of the manner of the worke because the Law requireth the ful obedience thereof to be performed by our selues which cannot be in this infirmity Ro. 8 3. But Faith referreth and sendeth vs to Christ for the perfourming of the Law and in regard of the manner of the worke it is farre easier to beleeue the Law to bee done by another who was able to fulfill it and was sent for that end then to do it our selues Also much easier it is to beleeue and giue assent to a true promise then to keep strictly without failing all Gods commandements If a King should say to a Subiect Conquer mee such a kingdome and I will giue thee my daughter with large dignities and liuings were it not harder then if he should say doe but trust my word and I will do all this for thee In these considerations one saith that saluation hath but a short cut it requireth no external labour but inward beleefe and Caluin saith that by the operation of the Spirit thou maiest easily beleeue with thy heart and confesse with thy mouth And Lyranus saith heere is shewed the facility of the righteousnesse of faith And Faius thinketh this saying of being neere in the heart and mouth to be a Prouerbiall speech commending the readines of that which is in the heart and mouth Tim. What vse heereof Silas It ministreth comfort to Christians to consider that the meanes of passage to heauen be not vnconquerable and vnable to bee attained Secondly it declares how vncomfortable Popish Doctrine is which excludes and shuts out all hope of being saued by tying saluation vnto an impossible condition of fulfilling the Lawe Thirdly it stirreth vs vp to the loue and praise of Gods goodnesse in appointing so easie a condition and giuing vs power to keepe it For Faith is the gift of God DIAL VIII Verse 10 11 12. For with the heart man beleeueth vnto righteousnesse and with the mouth man confesseth vnto saluation For the Scripture saith c. Tim. WHat doth this Text containe Silas First a repetition and confirmation also of that which was saide touching saluation the effect of righteousnesse by faith togither with an explication of the persons to whom righteousnesse and saluation belongeth The thing here repeated is that a Christian that beleeueth in Christ dead and raised to life and confesseth this his faith before men shall certainly and without doubt be saued Wherefore let vs obserue these things that faith and confession are coupled together as the tree and her fruite and as the Mother and the Daughter Also they be set soorth by their proper subiect or seats whereto they cleaue and wherein they sticke and rest Faith in the heart and confession in the mouth Lastly not the parts but the degrees of saluation be pointed at The first degree or beginning of it is righteousnesse to wit absolution from sinne by free pardon through the merit of Christ his death and being accounted iust before God by the worthinesse of his obedience to the Morall Law The second degree is perfection of saluation in heauen all the proceedings thereunto from Iustification till Glorification in Heauen heere called saluation Tim. Whence is the Confirmation of this proposition fetched Sil. From authority of Scripture as of Esay 28 16 v. 11. and Ioel 2 32. verse 13. Tim. What dooth Paul in the explication of the persons which shall be partaker of this saluation Silas First hee noteth them by an vniuersall particle Whosoeuer without difference of Nation or sex or age or condition Secondly he particularly nameth both Iew and Gentile which in respect 1. of saluation 2. and the neede thereof by sinne 3. with the meanes thereof by Faith are equal as he proueth by two Reasons one from the vnity of Gods effence who is the same Creator and Sauiour of all the elect Iew and Gentile Secondly from the immensiuenesse of Gods mercie which is so large as that it can suffice all sortes of people which trust in his Sonne and cal vpon him verse 12 13. Therefore by calling of the Gentiles nought was taken from the Iewes these were no whit endamaged by sauing them God is sufficient for both Tim. Come we now to the Interpretation and tell vs what is meant by Man As also what is meant by beleeuing Sil. By man is meant euery true Christian man or woman And by beleeuing is meant not onely to assent vnto the Doctrine of Christ but with confidence and sure affiance to embrace it Tim. What is meant by the Heart Silas The soule with all the faculties thereof but especially the will and affections which are therefore in phrase of Scripture tearmed the heart because the soule keepeth her chiefest residence in that fleshie part of man called the heart sitting and shewing her selfe there as it were in her chaire of estate Tim. What is it With the heart to beleeue to Righteousnesse Silas It is the same with that phrase Ro. 4 5. to haue Faith imputed for righteousnesse or with that Ro. 9 30 to attain to the righteousnes of faith or Gal. 3 14 24. To receyue righteousnesse or to bee made righteous by Faith Tim. What Lessons are wee to learne from the first part of the tenth verse Silas First that vnto righteousnesse before GOD that is to remission of sinnes and perfect Iustice by Christs death and resurrection there needes on mans part nothing but a true and liuely Faith Indeede good workes are witnesses to testifie the truth of this faith before men and vnto our selues but when the speech is of getting and receiuing righteousnesse euen pardon of our sinnes and eternall life by Christe workes are cleane to be shut out and excluded as hauing no power to enable vs to embrace Christ and this is the controuersie between vs and the Church of Rome that whereas they do part the instrumentall cause of our righteousnesse betweene Faith and workes wee attribute it vnto Faith onely according to the doctrine of the Scripture Rom. 3 27 28 29 30. Gal. 2 16. and of the Fathers agreeable thereunto The beleeuing man shall bee iustified in Faith onely Ambrose on 1 Cor. 1. Whosoeuer trusteth in Faith onely is blessed Hierom Chap. 3. vnto the Gal. By Faith onely shall Christ saue the offenders of the Lawe Chrysostome on the Ephesians To these might bee ioyned Basil Theophylact Hilarie Cyprian many more which teach the same truth as we now do Tim. What vse of this Doctrine Silas First it instructeth vs to know how necessarie Faith is for where this is there righteousnesse is and there is no righteousnesse where Faith is wanting Secondly it conuieteth the Papists of greeuous slaunders in that they charge Luther to be the first inuenter of this Doctrine touching righteousnes by Faith alone Whereas
workes Tim. But why might not the Iewes bee elected and reserued to God both by grace and merite of workes Silas That is not possible for if election were both of grace and workes then workes were no workes because what doth proceede of grace that commeth freely not of debt but what commeth by merite of workes that commeth by debt but debt and no debt that which is free and by deseruing bee most contrary thinges Therefore to say that men are elected and called partly of grace partly of the merit of foreseene workes that were to put togither things that cannot agree to make debt no debt merit no merit workes no workes Grace no grace and so to affirm and deny one and the same thing which is a most absurde matter and vtterly not possible to make contradictories to be both true For as a sonne that is willed to go on an errand to Rochester on foot his father promising him a crowne or an angell at his comming backe if his Father aske him how he will haue his money suppose that hee aunswere that he will haue it partly by fauour and partly by desert the reply to him is ready Thou canst not so haue it for if it be of fauour then it commeth freely therefore not by desert of the worke and if it be by desert of the worke then not by fauour for it is due that commeth by merit desert and there is no being beholding to fauour for that Tim. What is the Doctrine to be learned from hence Silas That mens workes haue no place nor stroke at all in the election and calling of sinners neither in their iustification nor saluation The reason is because works presuppose merit and merit presupposeth debt debt is flat against grace but men are called elected of grace also iustified and glorified as appeareth verse 5. Rom. 3 24. therefore election calling and the rest depend not vppon workes which destroy grace and grace destroyeth them when the cause of eternall life is disputed and debated Tim. But good workes come of grace how then are they such enemies Silas This is true grace is the mother and roote of euery good worke wee haue no power at all to thinke or will well naturally 2. Cor. 3 5. Iohn 15 5. but grace and workes cannot be ioynt causes of election and saluation In this case they fight together as put and admit the one and the other is taken away and shut out affirme the one and deny the other This Antithesis or opposition is to bee marked against all iusticiaries whose mouth is stopped and sealed vp with this one short sentence Tim. What vse is to be made of this doctrine Silas First it confuteth such as will haue grace and workes to ioyne together in the iustification and saluation of sinners which they say is partly of Gods grace partly of mens merites Wee say with the Apostle they bee altogether of grace and therefore not at all by merits Tim. But howe can such auoyde this conclusion of Paul If it be of workes then not of grace Silas The enemies of Gods grace haue sundry shifts to auoide the force of this consequence for some-times they say that the Apostle speaks only of ceremoniall works of the law as of Circumcision Sacrifices c. But this cannot be so because Pauls words be generall shutting out all workes whatsoeuer whether naturall morall or legall ceremonies Of them all he saith that if election to life eternall come of them then it commeth not of grace Also Abraham and Dauid had morall workes as well as ceremoniall yet in Chap. 4. verse 4 5 6. Paul denieth that Abraham or Dauid were iustified and saued by any workes which they had done but by faith Secondly they say that the Apostle speakes of the works of nature which say the Rhemists doe exclude grace fauour and mercy challenging of debt not of guift but not of Christian mens workes which come from the Spirite and grace of God these workes comming from grace may euidently consist with the same and be ioyned with Gods grace as causes of saluation This shift cannot bee currant not onely for that his words be generall but because Paul speakes of the election by grace by which all are saued Therefore the merite of all workes are excluded by whomsoeuer they bee done whether by circumcised Iewe or baptized beleeuing Christian or vnbeleeuing Gentile Secondly in Ephe. 1 4. good workes are saide not to be the cause of election but the end and fruite and effect thereof Lastly Ephe. 2 8 9. Paul saith expresly we are saued not of works but by grace through faith where note that grace and faith may well stand together but they doe shut out all sort of workes from being any moouing or meritorious cause of our iustification and saluation Thirdly they say that good workes are shut out from election to the first grace but not from election to the second grace that is they say that the elect are chosen of grace onely and are also freely called and illuminated of the Holye-Ghost without all workes but the seconde grace that is iustification also sanctification and glorification these do admit merite of works to ioyne with grace Vnto this shifte of theirs I answere that that Scripture which saith that election is of grace and we are called according to grace 2. Tim. 1 9. doth also say that wee are iustified by grace not by workes Rom. 3 24. that eternall life is the gift of God Rom. 6 23. also iustification and glorification bee fetched from Gods eternall loue and foreknowledge as the first and onely efficient cause as well as election and calling Rom. 8 30. Moreouer election is not onely to the first grace but to all the meanes and to heauenly glory which is the end Rom. 9 11 23. Lastly the Pharisie who ascribed righteousnes and saluation partly to grace and partly to his good workes went away vniustified Whatsoeuer therefore the Papists can alleadge to shake and weaken the credite of this texte yet it is so strong to ouerthrow the doctrine of popish merites and iustification by workes as one of themselues Andreas Proles was wont to say in his publike readings My brethren sithence holy Scripture attributeth whatsoeuer we are or haue al vnto grace whence commeth that horrible darkenesse and superstition to ascribe so much to merite of workes Truely the estate of Christianity needes very great and speedy reformation Tim. What other vse of the former doctrine Sil. Here is an admonition to all Christians that albeit they are bound to doe good workes of all sorts and to abound in them yet it is their duty to renounce the merite of them and all trust in them and to sticke whollye and onely in the grace of God through Iesus Christ for all things belonging to their saluation least if wee put neuer so little trust in any thing done by vs we be found the
and to become like a tottring wall or broken hedge for lacke of good lawes wise Gouernours the power of the sword c. For proofe heere of see Esay 2 2 3 4 5 6. c. which should preuaile with vs to moue vs to be thankefull to God both in word deed for that little strength that is left vnto vs least if we continue in our vnthankfulnesse and sinfull course we doe worthily thereby prouoke God to bowe our backs and strike through our loynes and strip vs of all our strength to become not only feeble stooping and crooked but fall downe flat till our enemies tread trample vpon vs as on myre and dirt in the streete If God did thus vnto Ierusalem and the Iewes which were great among the Nations euen his beloued people whom he had honoured with fame and renowne aboue all people yet if hee spared not them for their transgressions but made their strength to fall so as they were not able to rise vp Lamen 1 14 15 then iudge ye what cause we haue to feare the like iudgement whose sinnes are so much the more greeuous then theirs by how much the mercies that we haue abused are more and greater then were the mercies bestowed on them Wherefore let vs speedily repent and turne to the Lord with all our hearts earnestly praying him to heale our Land which is sore shaken by the losse of very many worthies in all professions and degrees of men amongst vs let vs beware least we giue God cause to take vp that complaint against vs which sometimes hee tooke vp against the Iewes by his Prophet Esay Chap. 57 verse 1. The righteous perisheth and no man considereth in his heart Tim. We haue heard hit her to of the three 〈◊〉 of punishments wished or prayed for against the Iewes let vs heare what is to be saide touching the equity of these punishments how inst they be Silas That is pointed at and noted in the worde recompence in the end of the ninth verse whereby is signified a retaliation and requitall to the wicked Iewes that as they had taken pleasure to afflict the righteous and to make all things greeuous vnto them and especially had perfecuted Iesus the sonne of God giuing him vinigar to drinke and gall to eate to vexe him with all So it was but rightfull that God mete home the Iewes with their owne measure paying them with their owne coyne and for a recompence to them should strike them with blindnes for sinning against their knowledge and should make their most pleasant and prosperous things to proue bitter and dangerous and finally should turne their greatest strength to weakenesse and feeblenes because they had abused it vnto wickednesse Tim. What instructions are we to gather from hence Silas First that it is a righteous thing with God not onely to punish sinners but to proportionate the paine and make it like vnto the sinne as it were eye for eye tooth for tooth bloud for bloud spoyling for spoyling iudging for iudging c. Touching which thing looke more vpon Rom. 1 25 26. This ought to awake sinners which haue iniuried eyther God or man that by hearty repentance they may preuent and turne away Gods righteous recompence Secondly from this word recompence wee learne another lesson namely that blindnes and ignorance from God hath not the nature of sinne simply and onely but of a recompence when it is inflicted as a due requitall for former sinnes and in this respect sinne is from God as author to wit as sinne hath the condition of a recompence but not as it hath the quality of a trangressiō for so it proceeds from Sathans suggestion and mans corruption In sinnes mans euill worke in offending God by breaking the law must bee seuered in consideration and truth both from the good worke of God and his iudgement by punishing offences righteously which if Papists would confesse for they cannot but see it they would cease to slander vs Protestants by speaking and writing that wee make God the proper cause of sinne as it is sinne whereas wee teach that in sinne beside the anomia which is from man himselfe there is also antimisthia which is the proper worke of God Tim. We haue seene what is to be learned from the parts of this text is there not some thing to bee learned from it beeing wholly considered Silas Yes and namely thus much that sometime and in some causes and from some persons imprecations and curses be lawfull Tim. In whom be imprecations lawfull and towards whom in what causes things in what manner Silas First it is lawful in God himselfe the soueraigne and righteous author of blessings and curses Leuit. 26. Deut. 28. For God being himselfe most holy can neyther blesse nor cursse no otherwise but holily Also in the Prophets and Apostles which had the Spirit of Prophesie a warrant by a speciall calling to curse others it was in thē absolutely lawful so to do Thirdly in publicke persons as Magistrates Ministers and Parents it is lawfull conditionally that the cause of their curse be not priuate but publickly to wit Gods glory 2. that their affections be not partiall nor maliciously distempered with desire of reuenge Now for the persons towards whom imprecation must bee vsed they must bee such as shew themselues to bee desperate and professed enemies to God and godlinesse such as were Ananias Simon Magus Elmas the Sorcerer the Traitor Iudas the cruell persecuting Iewes Thirdly curses must bee vsed onely in such matters as do concern God or his church And fourthly not in those thinges that are eternall for no man without peculiar reuelation may pray for the damnation of any man but in things which are temporall so farre forth onely as they may tend to the saluation of the parties Finally as touching the manner curses are to be wished no otherwise then with this affection of the conuersion of others expressed or vnderstood if they belong vnto God or otherwise that they may be confounded Tim. Whereunto may the knowledge of this doctrine helpe and further Christians Silas First to reproue such as rashly out of spleene or choller do banne or curse either themselues or others their children or neighbours and secondly to warne them to take care of repenting for that which is past hence-forward to take heede how they rush thorough indiscretion or impatiency into such wicked imprecations least besides the taking of the sacred name of GOD in vaine contrary to the third commandement they do puli downe vppon their owne heads these verie curses which they haue pronounced with their owne mouths as it is threatned in that verie precept and as it hapned vnto one Charles Duke of Bourbon who was slaine with a Gun-shot in the assault of a Towne as hee had wished vnto himselfe and vnto one Henry an Earle of Schuartzbourgh who miserably perished being drowned in a Iakes according to his vsuall imprecations and vnto
world And reconcilement is put for saluation wherof our atonemēt with God by Christ is the chiefest part because a sinner entreth then into the estate of saluation when sinnes are pardoned through Christ. Tim. But how may the casting away of some be the reconciling and sauing of others seeing euill must not bee done that good may come of it Silas First the casting away of the Iewes as it comes from God had the nature not of an euill but of a good worke because it was the execution of his Iustice vpon them for their vnbeleefe Secondly it was not properly the cause of the Gentiles saluation but accidentally insomuch as the Iewes being cast out by that occasion the Gentiles were called to Christ who could not be called till they were reiected by reason that the Iewes malice was such as made them to contemne the grace of Christ and to enuy that the Gentile should bee partakers of it Neither would they enter nor suffer others as a Dogge in the manger which neyther eateth the Hay nor suffereth the Oxen to eate it therfore as by tumbling down the dogge the beast comes vnto the foode so by casting off the stubborne Iewes the Gentiles found enterance both into the estate of Grace and Reconciliation with God Tim. What instructions haue wee from the former part of this Verse Silas First that God can turne the greatest euill to much good for his children the reason is his most admirable wisedome and goodnesse euen as Satan by his very great malice and subtilty can so poison the best things as they proue hurtfull to the wicked Tim. What is the vse to be made of this point Silas First to mooue vs to loue praise and admire the most singular loue and wisedome of God Secondly to labour after Gods example to make benefit of all euils which happen to our selues or others euen of our owne sinnes and of the transgressions of other men to make vs more humble and watchfull thereby for the time to come Tim. What other Lesson learne we from the beginning of this verse Silas That the summe of the Gospell is to preach reconciliation with God to wit that of sinners enemies and vngodly being without God and true life subiect to wrath and death for sinne wee are receiued to fauour and become friends children and heyres of life through Iesus Christ beleeued in See 2 Cor. 5. what Paul saith of God in verses 18 19. and of the Apostles and other Ministers verse 20. Tim. What be the parts of reconciliation Silas Two First remission of sins or not imputing our faultes with imputation of Christ his perfect iustice in keeping the Law vnto beleeuing sinners Secondly Sanctification in killing the strength of sin and quickening the soule by works of righteousnesse in the Spirit Rom. 6 2 3 4. Remission takes away the guilt and paine of sinne Sanctification remoues the dominion kingdome of sinne that it raigne not Rom. 6 12. and is a necessary companion of remission and fruite of reconciliation with God 1 Cor. 1 30. Tim. What profit is to be made of this point Silas That Preachers ought diligently to teach this Doctrine of reconcilement and the people to learne it that they may be throughly acquainted with Gods mercies to their comforting after heauinesse for sinne and their own miseries to their humbling after grace bestowed on them For as nothing will so cheare vp a troubled spirit as the declaration of the sweete sure mercies of Christ vnto firme and full attonement with God so nothing is more auailable to humble them thē the remembrance of their vnhappy condition in being strangers from God Tim. Come to the latter part of this verse and tel vs what is meant by receiuing as also by life Silas Heere the effect or consequent is put for the cause or antecedent which is an effectuall calling or receiuing of the Iewes into the Christian Church and by life is meant the quickning by grace to liue to God being before dead in trespasses Thus Oecumenius expounds this place What saith hee shall bee their assumption but this that we may say of him that assumeth or receyueth that he reuiueth them being dead in sinnes This speech is borrowed from the last great resurrection of the body whereunto the Scriptures do often resemble the restitution of the Iewes both from their bodily and spirituall calamities See Esay 26 19. Hos. 13 14. Ezek. 37 11 12 c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 11 12. to teach vs that the restitution of the Iewes beeing spiritually dead to the faith of Christ in the end of the world shall be as certaine and sure as that the corporally dead shal be raised out of their graues at the last day which is an Article of our faith Tim. What else are we taught from hence Silas That in all men naturally there is no more strength to do a good worke no not to thinke a good thought pleasing God then there is force in a deade man to do any worldly worke Iohn 15 5. 2 Cor. 3 4. 1. Cor. 2 14. This confuteth the counsell of Trent which teacheth that wee haue power if we will to receyue grace offered to beleeue and repent when wee are exhorted Session 6. But this is false because God must draw vs to Christ Iohn 6 44. also work in vs both the will and deede Phil. 2 13. and because of our wil being dead God is not onely to helpe it but to reuiue vs by putting as it were a new soule of grace into vs. This must stirre vs vp to giue the whole praise of our newe birth to God as Col. 1 21. Ephe. 1. 1 2 3. Againe from hence we may learne that wee may not despaire of the saluation of any either of others or our own how hopelesse soeuer For if God can reuiue the Iewes now sixeteene Ages rotten in the graue of sinne then how much more others also see Iohn 5 25 28. Tim. What Vse of this last point Silas This must nourish a charitable opinion of the greatest sinners and preserue men in hope of thēselues so they do not deferre but betimes endeauour to turne from sinne and seeke to God who is rich in mercie and power whose example should teach vs not to be cruell and rigorous as many Christians are being far vnlike to God who enclineth to pity pardon and to saue euen most for lorne offenders 〈◊〉 Whereas many thorough hardheartednesse be so implacable as nothing will appease them no 〈◊〉 and confession after crimes yea sundry Parents be heerein wodrthy to be blamed that as some are too indulgent so others too too seuere refusing to take to fauour their relenting and repenting children Oh what would become of themselues if God so deale with them But there is much mercy with God and plentifull compassions so ought there also to bee with men DIAL XIII Verse 16. For if the first fruites be holy so is the whole lumpe and if
be feared for good workes but for euill Wilt thou then be without feare of the power Do well so shalt thou haue praise of the same For he is the Minister of God for thy good Tim. VVHat is the purpose of the Apostle in this text Silas To perswade subiection to Magistrates which he doth by a new Argument 〈◊〉 fine from a twofold end of powers which were ordained of GOD First for the punishment of the euill or to restrain wickednesse Secondly for the praise of wel-dooers or to cherish and protect vertuous and obedient subiects Because he had threatned iudgement to such as disobey he therefore first beginneth with the former end and then proceeds vnto the latter which hee amplifieth being of more waight then the other whereunto hee returneth in the end of the fourth verse Tim. Expound the words and tell vs what is meant by Rulers and by good and euill workes Silas Rulers or Princes and chief Leaders Archontes is the same with powers which name is giuen to Magistrates to denote their might and this of Princes to signifie their preheminence and excellency aboue others which are vnder them and as before he meant all high low middle priuate and publicke so heere like wise by good and euill workes are vnderstood not works which bee such Theologically as a Diuine woulde speake of workes who calleth them good which being commanded of God are done in the faith of Christs name vnto Gods glory and them euill which come not of Faith or be forbidden in the Law But ciuilly good or euill that is vertuous or vicious actions as be enioyned or prohited by the good Lawes of that kingdome or City where wee liue Workes done according or against humane Lawes either naturall and common to all or nationall and positiue bee heere named good and euill workes Tim. How become Rulers a terror feare to euill workes Silas In respect of punishment whereof there be diuers kindes first in words rebukes or threatnings Secondly in deeds as stockes imprisonment banishment pecuniary mulcts and corporall paines as whipping losse of members and limme of good and life all which be painefull and dreadfull striking a terror both into good men to hold them in the course of obedience and into euill men to draw them from disobedience Tim. But how can any feare be to workes eyther good or euill Silas True euill workes doe not feare but by reason of euill workes men are caused to feare or terror belongs to men which doe euill workes by a metonymie are heere put for the workers or doers of them Tim. What doctrines doe arise from the wordes thus opened Silas First that such as liue well and obediently to good lawes neede not to bee affraide of Magistrates or of his punishments threatned by lawes The truth is good men must still feare Gouernors and lawes with a reuerent feare such as children haue towards their parents Prouer. 24 21. Rom. 12 7. But a perplexed and seruile terror pertaineth not to them this is the benefit of their obedience to good lawes to enfree their mindes from such a feare as malefactors haue whose feare is a continuall tormentor and to make Rulers not terrible but amiable to them yet feare of punishment is not profitable for them Secondly we learne that if vile persons be punished for their disobedience and disorder they haue cause to blame themselues and their ill doings but may not accuse the Ruler of the harmes which they suffer for all men by light of nature doe know that to euill deeds euill and paine is due and that society of men could not continue where rewards be not giuen after mens deserts Therefore if they runne into known crimes and haue demerited punishment for disobedient resisting Rulers they must thanke themselues and acquite the Ruler who doth but that which is equall and iust to maintaine lawes and publike peace and to bridle the enemies thereof Thirdly hence Magistrates may learne the bounds of their power which is not indifferently to terrifie all good and euill or to winke at offendors and afflict well-doers For this is the abuse of power and they which doe thus shall purchase iudgement to themselues from the hand of supreame power who is terrible euen to earthly powers if they abuse their office by beating the iust or bearing with the vniust For it is equally abhomination vnto God to condemne an innocent or to absolue and iustifie the wicked to whom the Ruler must bee terrible Hence it followes that sithence Rulers must suppresse euill dooers they must be men of courage because euill men with their malice haue both might and friends oftentimes Hence they are called oppressors Psalme 72. 3. and lob 29 17. Also that in Rulers there is required diligence in searching and iudgement in discerning of mens persons and causes which come before them to be able to know who doe well according to right and law and who doe ill contrary to equity and honesty and what penalties belong to seuerall offences which are brought to their hearing and examination Tim. But if the Rulers be fearefull and breed terror will not this cause them to bee hated and abhorred for men hate whom they feare and what is such an enemy to vertue as feare or such a spurre to wickednesse Silas The Apostle meeteth with this exception and giueth a good remedy to expell terror of Rulers out of al mens minds namely a study and care of doing such works as are agreeable to good lawes established such shall bee so farre off from terror or expecting punishment from Rulers as contrarily they shall receiue praise from them Tim. What is heere to be vnderstood by praises Silas Euen all that good which from Magistrates is due vnto honest subiects for that is called good in the next verse which is heere called praise also praise being opposed to terror and reuenge shewes that vnder it is comprehended freedome from condemnation and punishment absolution from crimes falsely obiected approbation of their obedience with some publike reward and recompence for their encouragement and for exciting others to duty moreouer defence and protection quiet possession of life goods estate and finally praise and commendation all this is contained vnder praise and is the fruite of subiection Tim. But it often happens that obedient good subiects doe misse of all these and meete with the quite contrary Silas That is a fault not in the powers but in the persons which abuse the power againe Paul sets downe not alwaies what is done by Rulers but what should be done Lastly if well doers misse praise from men they are sure to haue it from God and euill Rulers when they doe not praise good men causally by giuing them their due commendations yet they do it occasionly whilst by punishing good men vniustly they minister occasion to them to shew forth their patience to their praise and glory Power to hurt is giuen to diuels and wicked men that the
all to increase and preserue them what we can This must moue vs both to pray for greater measure of grace to be able to performe this better heereafter and instantly to beg pardon of God through Christ for our failing heeretofore for the debt of charity being neglected doth increase the debt of sinne and looke how much wee come short of paying the debt of loue so much we multiply the debt of sinne and therefore stand in need both of faith to beleeue the forgiuenesse of that which is past of repentance to amend our liues for time to come to walke henceforth in charity dooing all our things in loue Tim. Come now to the reason of the Apostle why we should loue one another and tell vs what is meant by the law and by the fulfilling of it Silas Among sundry acceptions of the word lawe as first for the books of Moses Secondly for the whole doctrine of the word Thirdly for the morall precepts giuen in Mount Sinai c. heere it is put for the second 〈◊〉 because he discourseth of the duties to our neighbour the loue whereof beeing coupled with the loue of God as an effect with the cause therefore it may well comprehend the whole morall law By fulfilling is meant heere not the exact keeping in euery point without any swaruing but the careful endeuour to do one commandement as well as another without baulking any of them The drift of the Apostle heere being this to teach that the law is generally kept by the exercise of loue which is therefore saide to bee the fulfilling of the law First because it is the end of the commandements 1. Tim. 1 5. Secondly for that it is the motiue to stirre vp to euery duty both to God man Thirdly because it is the summe of the law Math. 22. 37. 38. 39. Finally because it is the perfection of the lawe and were it perfect in vs would make vs perfect keepers of the law Tim. What is the doctrine we are to learne from hence Silas This ought very much to kindle our loue seeing it is such a helpe to the fulfilling of the lawe then which there is nothing except faith in Christ eyther of more honour and beauty or of more profite and benefit then to be keepers of the lawe by which first wee haue 〈◊〉 with God whose image of holinesse and righteousnesse is most absolutely and liuely purtrayed in the lawe the neerer therefore we come to the law the liker we are to God Againe our study to walke in the law is both a signe of a blessed man and the way to blessednesse Psal. 119 1. and 112 1. If the keeping of the law be so beautifull and beneficiall iudge how behouefull it is to imbrace loue which inables vs to keepe the law heere in some measure and in heauen perfectly As Paul saith of loue if wee had all graces without it they were nothing so may I say if we could keepe all the commandements and not do them in loue it were nothing Wherefore let all men that haue their hearts endued with loue thinke they haue a great blessing and thanke God for it and as the Apostles prayed Lord increase our faith so let euery good Christian pray Lord encrease my loue for the more we loue the more we fulfill the law and the more we fulfill the law the more we resemble God the giuer of the lawe and the liker wee are to God in holinesse the more we are to be like him in happinesse Besides all this though loue bee not the forme of faith yet it is a necessary effect of iustifying faith which workes by loue Gal. 5 6. and a fruite of the Spirite Gal. 5 22. The bond of perfection Col. 3 14. The badge of a Christian Iohn 13 35. Touching the properties works of loue also for the excellency and continuance read 1. Cor 13 4. to the end Tim. But whereas many pretend loue and haue it not how shall wee know when we haue indeede the gift of Christian charitie Silas First by the obiect of our loue if it bee right that is if we loue euery one that is our neighbour louing one man as well as another without partiality though some men more then others being wel affected vnto all howsoeuer others be affected vnto vs as Christ loued his enemies so must we This is one and the best triall of our loue Secondly by the measure or maner rather of our loue that we loue our neighbor as our selus that is as constantly without fainting as sincere without dissembling being as carefull through loue to bee helpfull to the bodies and soules of others and to euerie thing that is deere vnto them as we would haue it done to our selues Thirdly by the quality and nature of loue which stirs vs vp to respect one man as well as another though not so much so to tender him in one thing as well as in another for what God ioynes no man may separate that God which commaunded loue to our Neighbours persons hath enioyned charity towardes all the things of our neighbors not to hurt him in any of them no not so much as by a thought much lesse by disgrace or cruelty or vncleannesse or oppression or slander For if we do keepe that Law of not stealing and dooing wrong and breake the other which forbids adultery or incontinency or keepe this and trespasse by false witnesse being full of lies and euill reporters or false accusers of others or vntouched in all these yet be cruell vnmercifull and fierce offending against that Lawe which prohibits murthers or at a word caring somewhat to obserue one and being loose and licentious in transgression of some other not dooing many euils against our neighbors yet stiffely and obstinately culpable in some one or few certainly our loue is not that christian godly loue which looketh to euery precept and preuenteth the euill and harme of our Brethren in euery thing as much as lyeth in vs for loue dooth none euill vnto our neighbor Touching these singular and particular Precepts note that that of honouring Parents is omitted because they might be contained vnder powers also in an other Commandement the Commandement of Adulterie is prefixed vnto the Commandement of Murther Lastly this of fulfilling the Lawe by loue is ill wrested of Papists to proue Iustification by workes for this is not heere the Apostles purpose and when they shall proue that any meere man hath perfect charity such as the Law exacteth we will then confesse that righteousnesse before God may come by loue Meane while wee dare not crosse the doctrine of the Spirit teaching in so many plaine texts righteousnesse to be attained by faith without the workes of the Lawe which yet wee may in some sense bee saide to fulfill both because in our head it is perfectly kept that is allowed to such as beleeue in him Also with Augustine we say Quicquid 〈◊〉
obedience chap 12. v. 1. God ordainer of powers and is obeyed or resisted in them and how many waies ch 13. v. 2 3. God of peace of patience and consolation why so called ch 15. v. 5. God sent his Sonne out of loue to mankinde and why ch 8. v 32. God the onely auenger and why ch 12. v 19. God with him no vnrighteousnesse or cruelty either in execution of decrees or in the decrees themselues Ch 9. v 14 19 20. chap 11 v 35 36. God no respecter of persons ch 2. v 11. Howe persons may bee respected Gods will supreame cause of all his counsel and works ch 9. v 11 15. Gods will not to bee registred how it is to be vnderstood ch 2. v 19. Gods glory in manifestation of his mercy iustice the vtmost 〈◊〉 of all his counsels ch 9. v 22 23. Gods wrath and Iustice how fearfull a thing ch 3 5. and ch 5. v 6. and 8. Gospell of God why so called ch 1. v 2. and 15. verse 16. Gospell what it signifyes preached by the Prophets the authority excellencie antiquity and efficacy of it ch 1. v. 2. Gospell wherein it differs from the Law ch 1. verse 17. Gospel not to be ashamed of ch 1. v 16. Gospell how the power of God ch 1. v 16. Gospell how called a form or mould ch 5 v 17. Gospell what a blessing to enioy it ch 3. v 2. Gospell good holie iust ch 7. v 12. Gospel to be delighted in ch 7. v 22. Gospel how to bee esteemed and receiued Chap 1. v 2 3. Gospel preached both is obiect and instrument of Faith Gospel how the Iewes enemies to it Ch 11. v 28. Gospel why at first confirmed with myracles Chap 15 v. 19. Gospel a sacrificing sword ch 15. v 16. Gospel bow cause of death being a word of life Gospel word of faith and why Ch 10 v. 8. Gospel brings Spirit of Adoption Ch 8. v 14. Good why the Law so entitled Ch 7 v. 12. Good earnestly to bee sollowed Ch 12. v. 9. Good purposed when it cannot be effected Ch 15 verse 22. Good which we would we cannot alwayes do Chap 7. verse 15 16. Good is wrought out of al things toward the elect ch 8 v 28. Good doers may looke for praise and neede feare no punishment Chap 13. verse 3 4. Good by the wise GOD drawne out of euil Ch 8 v. 28. Ch 11 v 11. Good by sinne conuerted to euill Ch 11. v 9. 7. Grace what it signifies how manifold the spring of all good giftes Chap 1 ver 7. Grace howe holinesse so called Chap 6. v 23. Grace how Apostleship so tearmed Ch 1 verse 5. Ch 15 15. Grace extolled by Faith suppressed by the Law Ch 4 16. Grace in cause of Iustification contrary to works Ch 11 verse 6. Grace more abounds wher sinne abounds how to bee vnderstood ch 5. v 20. What it is to bee vnder Grace ch 6. v. 15. Grace of Christ how preuailes aboue Adams sin ch 5. v 16 17 c. That Grace may abounde we may not sin Ch 6. v. 1. Grace of God how necessary for all beleeuers Cha 16 v. 20 and 24. Griefe what it is cha 10 verse 2. We must grieue mourn with such as mourne how Ch. 12. v. 15. Griefe in Paule great for the abiection of the Iewes Chap 9. verse 23. and Ch. 10 1 2. H. Heart what it signifies ch 10 v. 9 10. From the heart what it is ch 6 17. From the heart prayers must come if they be accepted ch 10 15. Heart-hardnesse what it is how manifo'd how procured how to be cured how dangerous fearfull when it is whollye and for euer Markes to know it by the causes of it ch 2. v. 5. Chap 11 v. 7. Hast an effect of vnbelief and cause of shame ch 9. v last Head of the Church not Peter or Pope but Christ. Ch. 12. v. 4. Hearing how Faith by it Ch. 10 14. Heauens howe vnder vanity how to bee glorified New heauens what Ch. 8. v 21 22. Heathen their calling to Christ prophefied of ch 15. v. 9 10. 11. Heathens how a wild Oliue ch 11. v. 17. Of their grafting in and how partakers of the fatnesse of the Oliue Heathens how beholden to Gods bountifulnes chap. 11 v. 18 19 20 21. Holy how Scriptures bee so why the law is so entitled ch 1. v 1 2. Christians sacrifice how holy ch 12. v. 1. Holinesse way to heauen ch 6 v. 23. Holy how the branches so because root is so ch 11 16. How our children beso ib. Hope what it is how manifold how Christian hope differs from 〈◊〉 see ch 5. v. 5 6. and c. 8. v. 24 25. Hope how it makes not ashamed Hope how saued by it Hope the office of it Hope how the fruite of experience and ioyned euer with patience ch 8. v. 24. Hope is of good things to come only of eternal glo ry chiefly See ch 8 24. Hope a temedy of afflictions ch 12 v 12. I. Iesus what it meanes ch 1 1. 3. Ignorance of God how great a sinne why to bee auoided ch 2. v. 12. Ignorance how it excuses Ignorance polluteth zeale Ignorance ioyned with pride and rebellion against God ch 10 v. 2. 3. Ignorance how dangerous in a guide and teacher Ch. 2 v. 19 20. Image of God vnlawfull how Image and Idol all one ch 1. v. 23. 25. Iustice imputed inherent Iustification how differs from sanctification Causes and effects of it Ch. 〈◊〉 v. 14. Iustified how wee are by Christs resurrection ch 4. verse last Iustification the partes of it how it is the grounde of peace ch 5. v. 1. K. King how Christ is so ch 1. v. 3. Kingdome of Christ spirituall Kingdome of God what be the conditions and parts of it ch 14. v. 17. Kissing the Booke in an Oath ch 9. v. 1. Kisses how vsed in the primitiue Church ch 16 v. 16. Knowledge of the worde how excellent and necessary ch 13. v. 12. Knowledge part of faith ch 14. v. 14. Knowledge of sinne speculatiue and experimental both by the Law ch 7. v. 7. Knowledge of the Lawe what it worketh ch 3. v. 20. and 4. v. 15. L. Law how many significations ch 3. 19. Law how manifold of nature of Moses Ceremonial iudiciall morall how abrogate Chap. 2. v. 14. and Ch 10 4. Law how spirituall and what to be learned by it ch 7 v. 14. Law how called iust ch 7 v 12. Law impossible to be kept and why ch 8. v. 3. Law how ordained to life and occasion of sinne and death Chap. 7. verse 10 11. Law of members and of minde what they be ch 7. v. 23. Lawe how to be delighted in and why ch 7. v. 22. Law cannot iustify vs and why ch 8. v. 3. Law the righteousnesse of it neither easie possible cer taine or comfortable chap. 10. v. 4 5 c. Law how the inheritance is not by it ch
and man Iam. 3. 9. Thirdly it is recompensed with the like Psalm 109. 17. He loueth cursing therefore it is come to him Tim. What is the next effect of our corruption Sil. Cruelty feete swift to shed bloud that is to compasse and commit slaughter all men are such by nature except grace do either restraine or correct and cure our malicious nature this testimony is out of Esay that by the mouth of two witnesses euery word may be ratified Feet signifieth affections with readinesse and shedding signifieth cruelty with greedines powring it out Tim. What is the fruit of their cruelty Sil. Destruction and calamity actiuely towards others whom they destroy and also towards themselues passiuely at the last as in Cain Pharaoh Iewes Iudus who were giuen to cruelty they were rewarded accordingly bloud did draw on bloud Tim. What is meant by the way of peace Sil. A peaceable and quiet trade of life which these did not follow but were of a turbulent nature and whereas hee sayeth they know not the way of peace hee meaneth that they doe not approue it nor practise it Like phrase in Psal. 1. 6. 7 knowing put for allowing Tim. What reasons may encourage vs to liue peaceably Sil. First the commandement 〈◊〉 God Rom 12. 18. Secondly the sweet and manifold profit of peace Psal. 133. Thirdly the sowre fruites of contention Fourthly the example of godly men as Abraham Moyses Ioseph Lastly for that God is a God of peace heauen a place of peace and the Gospell a worde of peace and Christ a mediatour and Prince of peace Tim. Towards whome is peace to be kept Sil. Towards our selues and others with kinsfolks and neighbouis with friendes and with enemies faithfull and infidell Rom. 12. 18. Tim. What is this that hee sayth the feare of God is not before their ere 's Sil. That men doe not thinke themselues to be in Gods presence Secondly that they are not drawne from euill by this consideration Thirdly that they are not moued to do good vppon desire to please GOD. Fourthly when they speake vnto God and doe heare him speake vnto them they do it not with due reuerence and awe Tim. Why doth he shut vp all with this sentence Sil. Because the lacke of this is the fountain from which all other euils doe flowe where Gods feare which is the bridle and curb to sin is absent all vices will there bee present and abound Tim. What things may stirre vp the heart to feare God Sil. His infinite iustice and power Secondly his maruelous prouidence and rule ouer all thinges Thirdly his incomprehensible mercies towardes his children Fourthly his iudgements vpon the wicked and sharpe chastisements vppon the godly Fiftly examples of such as fearing him haue been blessed and protected Sixtly the great and precious promises made to such as feare GOD as that they shal be happy be preserued blessed in their goods name 〈◊〉 soules and bodie temporally and eternally see Psal. 112. 128. DIAL IX Verse 19. Now we know that whatsoeuer the Law saith it saith to them that are vnder the Law that euery mouth may bee stopped all the world subiect to the iudgement of God Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Text Silas It is an answere to the secret obiection of the Iewes which were ready to alledge that the aforenamed Scriptures did not belong vnto them but vnto some other Vnto which the Apostle doth answer that the Law and Doctrine thereof being giuen properly to the Iewes whatsoeuer was written in the Law must needs concerne them at least principally Tim. How proued he that the things in the Law did belong to the Iewes Sil. By these three Arguments First from the reference which the Law hath to them to wit the Iewes to whom it was giuen Secondly from the end that euery mouth should be stopped Thirdly from the testimony of the Conscience whereas he saith Wee know as who should say there is none of vs ignorant of this Tim. What doe we learne from hence Silas That besides the light of the word GOD hath set vp a light in euery mans Conscience which maketh him see and know what is true and fit to be done and what is otherwise Tim. How is the word Law taken heere Silas Not strictly for the ten Commandements as Mat. 22 36. nor yet for the doctrine of saluation as Ps. 19 7. but for the whole Scripture of the old Testament as appeareth by the fore-named sentences cited out of the Psalmes and Prophets Tim. What do we learne by this Sil. That euery sentence of Scripture hath the force and authority of a Law to prescribe enioyne command and therefore with reuerence and submission to be receiued and obeyed Tim. What is it to be vnder the Law in this place Sil. To haue the Law appointed for our vse and instruction else-where it signifieth to be vnder the condemnation and rigour of the Law heere it signifieth to be vnder it as a Schoole-maister and teacher to direct and informe vs touching the will of God and our owne estate Tim. What doth this teach Silas That it is a speciall and peculiar mercie to haue the word of God allotted vnto vs for our direction and comfort therefore to neglect or despise it is more then vnthankfulnesse euen iniquity Tim. But to what end doth the Scripture condemne euerie man of sinne Silas That euery mouth may bee stopped and all the world subiect to the Iudgement of God Tim. What is meant by hauing euery mouth stopped Sil. It is a borrowed speech taken from such as haue something put in their mouth as a gagge to hinder their speech by which the Apostle meaneth that those Testimonies of Scripture which beare witnesse of our sinnes they declare vs voide of all defence so as wee haue nothing to say for our selues why we should not perish but onely the plea of pardon and mercie Psal. 51 1 2 3. Tim. Whom doth this reproue Sil. First the blinde Gospellers which plead for themselues their seruice of God their own good doings thinking to merit thereby Gods kingdome Secondly the blinde Papists which plead for themselues the merit of workes both deuised by themselues and condemned by God Lastly all men which rest in themselues for saluation Tim. What is meant by the world Sil. The people and inhabitants of the worlde the place containing put for the persons contained by a Metonymie Tim. What is it to be obnoxious or subiect to the iudgement of God Silas To be guilty and worthy of punishment before him which is the case of all men without exception of any All are by nature the Children of Gods wrath Ephes. 2 3. Tim. Whom doth this reproue Sil. Such as say the Virgine Mary was free from all sinne Secondly this doth teach vs that all haue neede of a Sauiour seeing all are thorough sinne guiltie of damnation DIALOGVE X. Verse 20. Wherefore by the workes of the Law
the Spirite moues Christians to bee holy and iust in their counselles and meditations heauenly and deuine and carrieth them to thinges vnpleasant and quite contrarie to the flesh yet such as bee acceptable to God but it is quite otherwise with the flesh which moueth men to things which are vnrighteous and wicked earthly vain and hatefull to God Secondly it is knowne by those fruites of the Spirit and flesh mentioned in Gala. 5 19. 20. c. Tim. What other thing are we to learne out of this verse Silas A new and forcible reason to stirre the regenerate to liue holily because they are the sonnes and adopted children of God and therefore must bee holy as their heauenly Father is holy also because God hath vouchsafed them his Sonnes Spirite to bee their leader which is a worthy priuiledge for the world cannot receiue this Spirit as Christ saith Iohn 14. 24. DIAL XIIII Verse 15. For ye haue not receiued the spirit of bondage to feare againe but ye haue receiued the spirite of adoption whereby we cry abba Father Tim. VVHat doth this text containe Silas The second reason to proue beleeuers to bee the Sonnes of God which is inuocation or calling vpon God by prayer with child-like confidence as vpon a most louing and most mercifull Father This argument is drawn from an adioynt or property of the Sonne of God for all they and none other then they can call vppon God with a filiall and child-like trust and confidence Moreouer whereas Paul had said of all the Sonnes of God that they are ledde by the Spirite of God nowe hee declareth what Spirite that is wherewith they are ledde and gouerned to wit the spirit of adoption which is heere set foorth by the contrary to wit by the spirit of bondage and feare and also by the effects to wit feruency and earnestnes in prayer whereby we cry Abba Father Tim. Collect now the summe of this verse tell vs of what parts it doth consist Silas The summe is this that all true beleeuers they are the Sonnes of God seeing they can call vpon God as their louing Father and are gouerned by his Spirit not of trembling but of adoptiō The parts of this text be two the first is a property of Gods Sonnes to wit faithfull and feruent prayer The second is the cause of this prayer to wit the spirit of adoption Tim. Come we now to interpret the words and tell vs what is meant by receiuing ye haue receiued Silas Effectually to feele the grace and operation of the holy Spirit in this sence wee are sayd to receiue the word and the spirit when they become effectuall in our heartes And on the other side they are sayd not to receiue the spirit in whome the vertue and efficacy of the spirit doth not vtter it selfe Iohn 14. 24. The world cannot receiue the Spirite Tim. What is signified by bondage and feare Silas 〈◊〉 feare or such feare and trembling as vseth to bee in bondmen or slaues which feare the whip or punishment and for the onely dread thereof they forbeare euill Tim. What is meant by adoption Silas An action of God an adopting and taking them to be sonnes by sauour which are none by nature Tim. What are we to vnderstand by the Spirit Silas The third person in the Trinity euen the Holy Ghost which before was called the Spirit of God and of Christ. Note this that although the Apostle maketh heere mention of the Spirit of feare and of adoption yet the holy Spirit of God is but one but this one spirit hath sundry effectes and workings euen in the selfe same persons as appeareth in the example of these beleeuing Romanes in whome the spirite of God first of all brought forth feare their conscience trembling like bond-men before their Lord and Iudge and afterwards adoption and liberty so as they could speak and pray to God as children to a most kind Father Whereof we are admonished by this particle againe ye haue not receiued againe giuing to wit that before they were conuerted the spirite engendred feare and much dread in them but nowe they were conuerted they had receiued another effect of the spirit to wit liberty and boldnesse by the assurance of their adoption The marke which the Apostle aimes at in all this is to moue the godly not onely to doe the wil of God and please him but to doe it willingly and readily being made his Sonnes by adoption and free from all feare and bondage they were deliuered from the handes of their enemies to serue God in true righteousnes and holines without feare Luke 2. Tim. The meaning of the Apostle being thus explayned let vs heare what instructions arise from hence Sylas First of all we learne by what steps and degrees the Spirit of God proceedes in the conuerting of elect sinners the steppes or degrees are two the first whereof is seruile feare and trembling the second is the adoption of sonnes accompanied with much liberty and holy boldnes The true causes and groūds of this proceeding of the spirit in the conuersion of a sinner be these three First that all Gods elect thorough the corruption of nature are the children of wrath in order of 〈◊〉 before they are the children of God by adoption and grace Rom. 5 6 7 8. The second ground and reason is that the elect become fit to enter into the estate of adoption and grace by seeing feeling fearing the misery of their former estate by nature The third ground is the ordinance and will of God so appoynting that the elect should haue their conscience bruised and humbled by feare before they be set at liberty by grace Ephe. 6. 1. 2. 3. Math. 3. 5. 6. 7. Marke 1. 9. 10. Esay 61. 1. Tim. But by what meanes and instrument is this seruile feare wrought in the hearts and consciences of the elect Silas By the lawe of God which as it was giuen in Mount Sinai in a terrible manner by lightning thundring fire c. So the proper effect of it in mens consciences is no other but terror and dread feare and trembling therefore the ministration of the law is tearmed by the Apostle the ministry of death and condemnation because it begets the feare and sence of these things beeing reuealed in the law to mens conscience in a liuely manner Example hereof wee haue in Felix who trembled when Paul preached the lawe vnto him Acts 23. 25. Secondly of Paul himselfe who was filled with deadly feare in his heart by the knowledge of the law Rom. 7. 9 10. Tim. When the Spirit doth by the law worke feare in the harts of the elect by what way doth he it Sil. By meanes of a practicke sillogisme after this sorre Euery trāsgresfor of Gods law is accursed being guilty of eternall torments in hell this proposition is Gods owne voyce Deut. 27 26. Gala. 3 10. But I am a transgresfor of Gods law saith the elect