the dead from whence also he receiued him in a figure And as hee staggered not at the first promise concerning his birth through vnbeliefe so neither did he now dispute with God about the lawfulnesse of his act nor reason how he should be raised againe Iustified he was at both instants by his beliefe not as terminated to his worke or to the possibilitie of Isaacks birth and resurrection but as through them it found accesse to his birth death and resurrection whom Isaac prefigured Hauing performed Gods will in obeying his Commaund to sacrifice his onely sonne hee patiently expected the promise concer-cerning his Redeemer whose incarnation whose sufferings and exaltation are obiects of Faith not of works effected by God and not by man although to the like application of their benefits the right works as were in Abraham be most necessary seeing true beliefe of this promise as in the first section was declared virtually includes the same minde in vs that was in CHRIST a readinesse to doe workes of euery kinde which notwithstanding are no associates of Faith in the businesse of iustifycation Not to bee weake in faith not to doubt of the promise through vnbeliefe to be strengthened in faith to be fully perswaded that bee which had promised was able also to performe were pure acts of faith though virtually including works as proper thereto as forcibly excluding all other vertues from sharing with it in this businesse as can possibly bee conceiued yet sayth the Apostle euen for these acts late mentioned it was imputed to him for righteousnesse How preposterous then and basely shuffling are the glosses put by Bellarmine vpon the Apostle in this place as if his purpose had been to shew that the impious and vniust could not be iustifyed by workes onely because Abraham though iust before was not made more iust by meere workes without faith when as he leuels his whole discourse to the cleane contrarie point maintained by vs That seeing righteousnesse was imputed to Abraham by faith and not through works none after him should in this life at any time whether before or after the infusion of grace or inherent righteousnesse presume to seeke or hope for like approbation from God otherwise then onely by faith Thus much the Apostle hath as fully and plainly expressed as any ingenuous Reader can desire Now it was not written for his sake alone that it to wit the strength and full assurance of his faith was imputed to him sorrighteousnesse but also for vs to whom it the like faith shall be imputed for righteousnesse if wee belieue in him that raised vp IESVS our Lord from the dead The ground of the Apostles reason or similitude here mentioned wherein the force and strength of our argument is included supposeth all our righteousnesse whether actuall or habituall should bee as vnapt to attaine euerlasting life or saluation which is the end of all graces bestowed vpon vs as Abrahams decrepit body was to produce so many nations yet as he onely by belieuing God who was able to effect thus much and more obtained the promise and was blessed with more children from Sarahs dead wombe then the most fruitfull Parents that liued before or should come after them so wee onely by like firme beliefe in the same God which raised vp our Lord IESVS CHRIST from the dead shall bee partakers of the promise made in him heires of eternall life whereto seeing our inherent rightcousnesse hath no proportion it must for this reason still be sued for as a meere gift of God farther exceeding all desert of any supernaturall grace in vs then the mighty increase of Abrahams seed did the strength of his decaied nature 6. The first spring of all Romish errors in this argument issues out of their generall ignorance of Saint Pauls phrase amongst many of whose sayings seeming hard and incompatible with their schoole conceits that Rom. 4. of Gods iustifying the impious and vngodly ministers greatest offence and causeth them to inuert the course of their diuinitie quite contrary â—o the Apostles methodâ— To pronounce him iust that is internally impious and vniust cannot in their schoole learning stand with Gods truth but to make him which ere while was by nature vniust and impious inherently and perfectly iust by plentifull infusion of grace is an argument as they deeme of his goodnesse no disparagement to his iustice as perchance it were not might wee iudge of his purpose to saue sinners by the rules of humane reason neuer consulting the Canons of life But if wee conceiue of Gods grace by his comments in whom it dwelt in great abundance this verie conceipt of being iustified by its inherence includes extreame antipathy to the nature and vtterly peruerts the right vse of it as to restraine thâ—â— same Apostles speeches to the first iustification or prime infusion of inherent righteousnesse which is the necessarie consequent of the former error is coÌ„tradictiously to contest with the spirit by which he vttered these diuine Oracles For if belieuing him which iustifies the impious were imputed for righteousnesse vnto Abraham after he had been for a long time more righteous then the ordinarie sort of Gods Saints or Elect Abraham all this while vnfaignedly belieued himselfe to be a sinner no way iustified in himselfe but seeking to be iustified by him who if he shew not mercie vnto sinners whiles they are sinners all mankind should vtterly perish Against this poisonous leauen wherewith the Pharisee first and the Romanist his successor since hath infected the bread of life and tainted the first fruites of Gods spirit S. Paul prescribes that Catholick antidote There is no difference all haue sinned and are depriued of the glory of God and are iustified freely by his grace through the redemption which is in CHRIST IESVS Abraham was all his life time comprehended in this catalogue and is made by the Apostle as a perpetuall so a principall instance of that finall resolution Therefore we conclude that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the Lawe Was hee then in no sort iustified by workes Yes hee might boldly contest as Iob did and euery godly man yet safely may with others for integrity of life and plenty of workes in which hee might iustly reioice or glorie yet with men not with God In this sense their resolution which say we are iustified by workes before men not before God is most true and warranted by that place of Saint Paul let them nothence deny or occasion others to forget that such integritie or comparatiue rightcousnesse to inherent is necessarily presupposed to iustification in the sight of God and doth not only declare our faith or iustification to men seeing it implies a contradiction in the vnanimous tenent of all reformed Churches to admit faith precedent and workes onely subsequent to the iustification whereof Paul here speakes His drift and scope in that third and fowrth to the Romans
present danger or disagrace as not odious in the worlds sight And many scattered delights meeting in one like a multitude of broad shallow streames falling into one deepe narrow channell carry the soule with least interruption of speedy passage into the bottomlesse gulfe Vnited force is alwaies strongest and for this reason it is oft harder to renounce one sinne wherein wee delight much then a great manie we equally affect Freedome from manie vsually breeds secret presumption or indulgence to our delight in some one or few and indulgence bringeth forth hardnesse of heart Of if the worldly wise-man can curbe all his desires from bursting out into knowne euils this aboundantly contents him but so doth it not his God vnto whom this permanent luke-warme ciuill temper symbolizing onely with true religion in abstinence from actuall euill not in feruency of deuotion is more abhominable then the distemperature of publicanes and open sinners accompanied vsually with most vices yet not so firmely wedded vnto any but discouerie of their filthinesse may induce them to be diuorced from all It is much worse to be at the verie entrie into the kings banquet and retire or not goe in than to stay at home and pretend excuses A chaste infidell sayth S. Augustine is not onely lesse prayse-worthy than an incontinent belieuer in that hee is continent without beliefe but rather lyable to greater reproofe in that being continent hee doth not belieue 7. Of such vniformity in practising dueties expresly taught by the rule of faith as hitherto hath beene prosecuted is that most true which the moderne Romanist in no point destitute of one ape tricke or other to mocke God and man with a counterfait shape of true religion misapplies to curious points of speculation bearing men in hand that if they belieue not euerie point of faith alike they belieue none aright Whence many things they teach as necessarie to saluation being intricate and impossible to be conceiued with such euidence or probabilitie as may ground certaintie of faith seely soules are brought to distrust the perspicuitie of scriptures and to repose that confidence in their instructers which they should doe in Gods word and so for feare least they should haue no faith but by belieuing as the Church doth they belieue the Church only not God nor any article of faith as was deliuered in the former booke Nor can their workes if conceiued or begotten by the booke or Iesuiticall rules of life be euer acceptable in Gods sight because not inspired by true and liuely faith vniformely spreading it selfe throughout all their faculties cherishing and strengthening them as the Sunne doth plants to bring forth fruite To speculatiue points or our Assent vnto diuine reuelations as true the former rule is onely then appliable when wilfull contempt or indulgence to our owne affections doth blinde our vnderstanding He that vpon such motiues doubts of any principall article or disâ—ents from it rightly belieueth none but if for want either of naturall capacity or particular illumination of Gods spirit hee cannot so firmely Assent vnto some principall truth as others doe to whome they are more fully reuealed so hee demeane himselfe during the time of his dissent or doubt according to that measure of knowledge God hath giuen him his faith may be sincere and sound though not so farre spread as it is in other men 8. But some better minded perhaps will here demaund how farre this vniformity in practise is to be extended as whether a man may not be more prone to one sinne then another or more apt to conforme his will and desires vnto Gods wil in some points of his seruice then in others without preiudice to the sincerity or liueli-hood of his faith If this pronenesse to euill and negligence in good proceed from strength of naturall inclination or long custome his relapse into the one or holding off from the other doth not disproue his obedience in those points wherin faith hath gotten full conquest ouer his desires if his inclinations to his beloued or bewitching sins proportionably decrease or wane as his zeale or deuotion in the points of duty are augmented But euery member of the old man must be mortified ere our faith be euery way such as that whereby the Iust doe liue The manner of whose life by Faith is now necessarily to be discussed more fully then in these present meditations was intended least from some passages in the former discourses the vnobseruant Reader happily suspect the difference betwixt vs and the Romish Church in this controuersie to be but small or to consist rather in words than in substance especially if works be so necessarily included as wee suppose in that faith which iustifies Nor seems it easie to reiect our aduersaries form of doctrine without some preiudice to Saint Iames in whose tearmes their assertions for the most part are conceiued This last preiudice notvvithstanding first remooued wee are to manifest their dissent from vs and from the forme of wholsome doctrine which Gods Word prescribes to bee as great in this question as in anie For admitting their Faith vvere sound and their workes which is before refuted liuely they vtterly inuert the right vse of both and by artificiall sleights or tricks of wit not discouerable by euery eye drawe poore soules from CHRIST the onely end of the Lawe as well morall as ceremonial the sole load starre of Faith and all other sanctifying graces CHAP. VI. Of difficulties arising from the former discourses in the Protestants doctrine of Iustification by faith without workes That faith is as immediately apt to do good vvorkes of euery kinde as to iustifie Of the diuers acceptions of iustification That the iustification by workes mentioned by Saint Iames is presupposed as subordinate to Saint Paules iustification by faith without workes The true reconcilement of these two Apostles contrarie speeches in appearance from the contrarietie of their seuer all ends or intentions 1. SAint Paul as is declared at large before includes workes in faith which Saint Iames takes as hee found it in vnfruitfull hearers destitute of good workes This difference notwithstanding alone considered doth no way salue but rather remooue the seeming contradiction between the one auouching and the other disclaiming iustification by faith without workes and cause it wholy to settle in Saint Pauls assertion or in the doctrine of Protestants thence deriued For whether iustified we be by workes and faith as Saint Iames expresly speakes or by a working saith as Saint Paul implies this faith workes such righteousnes as Saint Iames requires not in others but in our selues Seeing then both faith and the righteousnesse it workes are inherent in vs how are we not iustified by inherent righteousnes if iustified by such a working faith as Saint Pauls commaunds and we haue hitherto described This which we conceiue by way of doubt our Sauiours doctrine seemes to put out of all controuersie Except your righteousnesse exceed the righteousnesse of
helping and nourishing the poore For when Zacheus said Loe the one halfe of my goods I giue to the poore and if I haue defrauded any man I restore it fourefold Iesus answered and said This day is saluation come to this house was much as this man also is the sonne of Abraham For if Abrahams belieuing God were reputed vnto him for righteousnesse he likewise that giues almes according to Gods commandement belieues God and he that hath the truth of faith retaines the feare of God and he that retaines the feare of God hath God in his thoughts whiles he shewes compassion to the poore Therefore he workes because he belieues because he knowes all the word of God fore tels is true that the sacred scripture cannot lie that vnfruitfull trees i men barren of good workes must be cut downe and cast into the fire but the mercifull shall be called vnto the heauenly kingdome And in another place he cals such as are fruitfull in works faithfull denying this title to the vnfruitfull and barren If ye haue not beene faithfull in the vnrighteous Mammon who will commit the true riches to your trust And if ye haue not beene faithfull in that which is another mans who will giue you that which is your owne Saluianus * words here inserted in the margine imports no lesse 3. If the workes required by Saint Iames be not truely good without presupposall of saith nor iustification possible without presupposall of such workes the more opperatiue wee make Saint Pauls faith the more we rather draw then loose this former knot whose solution in this respect must be sought by vnfolding the diuerse acceptions of iustification Sometimes then it imports the decree or purpose of God to iustifie sinfull men as whom he predestinated them also he called and whom he called them also he iustified and whom he iustified them also he glorified About iustification in this sence there either is or neede to be no controuersie at least none pertinent to our present purpose But as God decreed before all times to create man yet did not create him vntill time had numbred sixe daies so although his purpose was from eternity to iustifie or absolue vs from our sinnes yet actually he doth not iustifie or absolue vs before we haue actuall being nor doth he iustifie all that haue such being but those onely which haue the seales or pledges of his calling of which whosoeuer are partakers are in a secondarie sence accompted iustified How shall we â—aith the Apostle that are dead to sin liue yet therein Know ye not that all we which haue beene baptized into Iesus Christ haue beene baptised into his death wee are buried then with him by baptisme into his death All persons baptized may be accounted iustified in the same sence they are dead to sinne and dead all such are to sinne not really or actually but by profession in as much as by receiuing this outward seale of Gods couenant or other like pledges of his fauour they binde themselues to abrogate the soueraigntie of sinne in their mortall bodies and to giue their members weapons of righteousnesse vnto God Thus when the Apostle speakes indefinitely of all their saluation or iustification to whom he writes his meaning can be no other then this that all of them haue receiued vndoubted pledges of Gods mercy and neede doubt of iustification actuall or finall absolution so they walke worthy of their calling Their error whose rectification Saint Iames sought did consist in holding these outward seales or conspicuous tokens of Gods fauour whereby their Assent vnto his promises as true was confirmed sufficient to finall approbation or admission into the inheritance of Saints albeit they did not consent vnto euery part of the Law as good in the practise Concerning iustification thus taken there is at this day little or no controuersie vnlesle betweene the spirit and the flesh or betweene our owne conscience and Sathan who still labours to perswade vs this kinde of iustification might suffice Thirdly in as much as God decreed to iustifie man by faith which euen in such as are saued by it is not ordinarily perfected in a moment we are said sometimes to be iustified when the first seeds of that faith which by taking firme roote by fructification or perfection added by the immediate hand of God becomes saluificall are first sowne in our hearts Hee that hath but a resolution for the present syncere though variable to walke in all the waies of his God is in scripture often instiled iust or righteous and may by this resolution or purpose be truely said iustified in the sight of God not absolutely but in respect of opposite prophanenesse or expresse dissimulation If the righteous saith the Lord vnto his Prophet turne away from his righteousnesse and commit iniquities in his transgression that he committed and in his finne that hee hath sinned in them he shall die And againe The righteousnesse of the righteous shall not deliuer him in the day of transgression c. when I shall say vnto the righteous that he shall surely liue if hee trust to his owne righteousnesse and commit iniquitie all his righteousnesse shall be no more remembred but for his iniquitie that he hath committed he shall die for the same And vnto such as are here specified though not vnto such alone that speech of Saint Iohn is litterally appliable Qui iustus est iustificetur adhuc he that is righteous let him be righteous stil or more iustified Nor can that other of S. Paul be restrained to those that haue attained sauing faith or final absolution The hearers of the law are not righteous before God but the doers of the Law shall be instified That is God doth approue their deeds so farre as they are consonant to his law and accounts the syncere practise of morall dueries whereunto light of nature did leade the Gentiles much better then the outward obseruance of legall ceremonies or sabhatarian delight in hearing Thou art not farre from the kingdome of God saith our Sauiour to him that that had discreetely acknowledged this truth to loue the Lord withall the heart and with all the vnderstanding and withall the soule and withall the strength and to loue his neighbour as himselfe is more then all burnt offerings and sacrifices Now if by such workes as the heathen or auditors of the Law not yet sanctified often practised much more by those workes which accompany true and liuely faith we may in a higher degree of the same sence be accounted iustified that is approueable in the sight of God or passiuely capable of a finall absolution or effectuall iustification And this was all Saint Iames meant in that assertion Yee see then how that a man of workes is iustified and not of faith onely which words are but equiualent to the like precedent what auaileth it my brethren though a man say he hath faith when he hath no workes
Sect. 3. c 8. p 5. PHILIPPIANS Cha. 3 Verse 8 9 Doubtlesse I thinke all things but losse for the excellent knowledge sake of Christ c. Sect. 1. c 5. p 13. 1. THESSALONIANS Cha. 2 Verse 16 The wrath of God is come vpon them to the vtmost Sect. 2. c 3 par 2. HEBREWES Cha. 4 Verse 2 The word that they heard profited them not because it was not mixed with faith Sect. 1. c. 8. p. 7 Cha. 10 Verse 35 Cast not away your confidence which hath recompence of reward Sect. 1. c. 10 p. 6. Sect. 2. c 6 p. 4. Cha. 36 Verse 36 Ye haue need of patience c. Sect 1. c. 7. p. 1. Cha. 11 Verse 1 Faith is the substance of things hoped for the euidence of things not seene Sect 1. c 5. p. 5. 6. Verse 2 By faith the Elders obtained a good report Sect. 1. c. 7. p. 2. Verse 6 Without faith impossible it is to please God ibid. Verse 7 By faith Noah being warned by God of things not seene c. vnto verse 11. Sect. 1 c 7. p. 3. Verse 18 He considered that God was able to raise him vp c. ibid. p 5. Sect. 2. c. 6 p. â— Verse 24 When Moses came to age c. Sect. 1. c 7 p. 8. Verse 20 By faith Isaac blessed Jacob and Esaâ— concerning things to come c. vnto verse 36 Sect. 1 c 7 p. 10. Cha. 12 Verse 2 Yet for the ioy that was set before him hee despised the shame c. ibid. p. 9. Verse 11 No chastening for the present seemeth to be â—oious c ibid p. 2. Sect. 2. c 6. p 8 Cha. 13 Verse 3 Remember such as are in bonds Sect. 1. c. 8. p. 3. IAMES Cha. 1 Verse 5 If anie of you lacke wisedome let him aske of God c Sect. 2. cap. 7. par 13. Cha. 2 Verse 10 Whosoeuer shall keepe the whole lawe and offend in one point is guiltie of all Sect 2. c 8. p 6. Sect. 2. c 5. p 4. Verse 14 What auaileth it my brethren though a man say hee hath faith and haue no workes c. § 2. c 6. p 4. Verse 19 The diuels beleeue that there is a God and tremble Section 1 cap. 8. par 8 Verse 21 Was not Abraham our Father iustified through workes c Sect 1. c 11. par 9 Verse 24 Yee see then how a man of workes is iustified c. Sect. 2. c 6. par 3. 4. Verse 25 Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot iustified by workes c. § Sect. c. 11. par 10 1. IOHN Cha. 1 Verse 10. If wee say that wee haue no sinne we deceiue our selues c. § 2. c 7. p 8. c 8. p 6. Cha. 2 Verse 1 If anie man sinne we haue an Aduocate with the Father c. § 2 c 8. par 4. Cha. 3 Verse 2 Beloued now we are the sonnes of God c. Sect 1. c 8. p 7. Verse 6 Whosoeuer abideth in him sinneth not ib. p. 5 Verse 7 He that doth righteousnes is righteous § 2. c 6 p 1. Verse 8 He that committeth sinne is of the Diuell c § 2. c 8. p 6. Verse 9 He that is borne of God sinneth not ibid p 5. Verse 14 We know that we haue passed from death to life c. § 2 c 4 p. 5 Cha. 5 Verse 5 Who is he that ouercommeth the word c § 1 c 8 p 7. REVELATIONS Cha. 22 Verse 2 He that is righteous let him be righteous still § 2. c 6 p. 3. CHristian Reader For casualtie whether in the text or margine of this Treatise alwaies reade causalitie for casually causally If the letter S either as an affixe or note of the plurall number sometimes want sometimes redound as if thou finde Abraham for Abrahams their for theirs formalitie for formalities performes for performe doe me or the Printer the fauour either to correct or not impute these or like pettie escapes which way as easily beamended as committed Such faults as alter inuert or obscure the sence are here corrected to thy hand Errata PAge 36 line 35 for will read nill p. 39. l. â—â— as p. 41 l. 14. three p. â—3 l. 34 other p. 44. l. â— affection or p. 51. â—â— directory â—5 nurture p. 54. l. 30. which binde p. 67. â—6 for ioy râ—glory p. 63. l. 3â— cut downe p. 8 â— l. 30. Patriot l. 6. an â— p. 90 l. 2. consonantly p. 96 l. 34. faculty p. 114. l. 23. vs. p. 117 l. 2â— Isoerates p. 126 l. 10 least l. 21. for and r. of p. 129. l. 34 nursed p. 133. l. 22 dele not p 139 l. 15 vnseasoâ—â—bly p. 146. l. 29 to loue p. 162. l. 14 vse p. 165 l. 1 had p. 172. l. 1 nâ—sâ—â—able p. 173 l. 30. for itâ— we p. 174 l 1 by ouâ— p. 178 l. 3 were p. 184 l 29 euacuacion p. 185 l. 7. is in diuels p. 186 l 23 from such p. 187 l. 14. euer p. 188 l. 13 propose p. 189 l. 2 her internall p. 199 l. 12 iâ—â—â—u p. 199. l. 18 they p. 206 l. 12 Paul commends p. 109 l. 2. seemes euen l. 35 of his p. 213 l. 25. the p. 214 l. 15 not doubt p. 216. l 29 vs or p 217 l. â—5 it imports p. 222 l. 1â— the like p. â—â—4 l. 32 the l. 30. onely let p 231 l. 28 Sunne p 235. l. 32 paedanticall p. 242 l. 5. owne p. 243 l. 8 recouer l. 30 euer p. 245 l. 14 whereby l. 3â— permitted p. 248 l. 17. these p. 249 l. 27 this life p. 251. l. 9 for all must r most p. 254 l. 1â— inherence l. 36. their p. 259 l. 1 the. p. 278 l. 26. r. weomen p. 290. l 12 destiny p. 294. l. 28. materiall p 295 l. 17 dele so p. 312 l. 30. matches p. 314 l. 37 Hippocrates p. 315 l. 3 in p. 320 l 29 inuitation p 323 l 3 louer p 327 l 32 vnconscionable p 328 l â—0 fests p. 333 l. 26 had that p 332 l 31 alike p. 342 l 29. dependance l 33 deepelier Page 44 liâ—â— 17 Read with some others or knowledge of the same 〈…〉 in different Page 243 l 35. for as heathen â—â—ad which had surprised the Heathen as heathen SAVING FAITH OR The Faith whereby the Just doe liue SECT 1. Of the nature essence and properties of that Faith by which the Iust doe liue CHAP. 1. Rules of Method for the right differencing of that Assent wherein Christian faith consists THat Christian faith includes an assent to supernaturall obiects or truths reuealed by God especially concerning Christ the means of mans saluation matters of the life to come hath been declared before Nor is there or can be any dissent among professors of Christianity about the quality of this assertion seeing the acknowledgment of fuch reuclations doth primarily distinguish christians from Iewes or Infidels About the extent or quantity of the obiect assented vnto or
and fidelity nor can the nature of faith be better notified by the effect or property then if we define it to be a fidelity in all the seruice of God raised from a firme Assent vnto the former transcendent truths of his bountifull rewarding all that diligently seek him that it is alwaies better to obey him then man as shall further appeare from the discourses following And it is already partly shewed in our meditations vpon Ieremy that praiers thus made in faith are still effectuall for obtaining priuate remission of our sin comfort in the day of trouble or for auerting Gods heauy plagues or curses from any land or people if both the suppliants thus qualified hold due proportion with notorious delinquents for number and the frequency or feruency of their supplications with the continuance or stubbornnesse of the other sinnes But he alone truly praies in faith that can with constancy prosecute the right choice of means which faith doth make and faithfully practice such duties as it prescribes for attaining the end whereto it directs 13. If any of you lacke wisedome sayth Saint Iames let him aske of God that giueth to all men liberally and vpbraideth not and it shall bee giuen him But let him aske in faith nothing wauering for bee that wauereth is like a waue of the sea driuen with the winde and tossed For let not that man thinke he shall receiue any thing of the Lord. Why Because he praies not in faith but is double minded and vnstable in all his waies In this doublnesse of mind or distraction of the soule as the word imports doth hypocrisie in his language that knowes the heart and minde properly consist For to pretend or promise one thing and wittingly and expresly though in the secrets of our owne hearts to intend another is in scripture-phrase an act of Atheisme or infidelity An hypocrite hee is in the same dialect that assents vnto the meanes of mans saluation as truely good whiles simply considered but disesteemes them in the actuall choice wherein contrary desires or affections vnrenounced vsurpe a negatiue voice or rather make a maior part of his owne soule against him so as he cannot make good his former promise with his whole Assent From this competition betweene beliefe of spirituall truths and carnall delights or pleasure both challenging full interest in one and the same soule doth that doublenesse whereof S. Iames speak arise And the vnconstancy or wauering of an hypocrite may best be resembled by a Polypragmaticall temper desirous to hold good correspondencie with contrary factions hence often enforced to shuffle from such promises as hee meant to performe when he made them but considered not how farre hee had beene engaged by former obligements or protestations from which being challenged by the aduerse party hee cannot â—â—inch without greater shame or griefe 14. Flattery lying and dissimulation of which hypocrisie is but the brood in the phrase of Gods spirit which searcheth the reines is not to professe one thing with the tongue and purpose another in the heart but rather to protest what for the time present we truly thinke without due examination of the soule or inward parts or resolution to renounce all contrary desires or really to disclaime all interest any creature hath in our minds or affections to the preiudice of the Creator as the Psalmist excellently expresseth this point The wrath of God came vpon them and slew the fattest of them and smote downe the chosen men of Israell For all this they sinned still and belieued not his wondrous workes Therefore their daies did he consume in vanity and their yeeres in trouble When he slew them then they sought him and they returned and enquired early after God And they remembred that God was their Rocke and the high God their Redeemer This conversion questionlesse was not in â—est or pretended only for the present but in their apprehension that made it sincere yet in his iudgement that was greater then their hearts or consciences false and deceitfull because imperfect and irresolute as the Psalmist in the next words instructs vs. Neuerthelesse they did but flatter him with their mouth and they lied vnto him with their tongues The height of their dissimulation as followeth was that their heart was not right with him neither were they stedfast beleeuing or faithfull in his couenant but as their Fathers had beene â— reflectary and rebellious generation a generation that prepared not their hearts and whose spirit was not faithfull with God Nor did this want of preparation or their vnfaithfulnesse proceed from want of purpose to doe God seruice whiles tentations did not assault them but herein rather that like the children of Ephraim being armed and bearing bowes they turned backe in the day of battaile that they kept not the couenant of God and refused to walke in his lawe when the lawe of the flesh did oppose it they for gate i. they did not esteeme his workes and his wonders that hee had shewed them These diuine characters of hypocrisie or dissimulation approues his opinion as well befitting the author that said it was impossible for a Coward to be either an honest man or a true friend For seeing honesty is but a stemme of truth or fidelity his obseruation differs onely in the subiect from that of the wise sonne of Sirach Woe bee to fearefull hearts and faint hands and the sinner that goeth two wayes woe vnto him that is faint hearted for he belieueth not therefore shall he not be defended woe be vnto you that haue lost patience and what will ye doe when the Lord shall visite you More exactly paralelled as well to the occasion and grounds of our Apostles discourse in Hebrewes chap. 10. 11. are these diuine sentences of the same Authour immediatly following They that feare the Lord will not disobey his word and they that loue him will keep his lawes They that feare the Lord will seeke that which is well pleasing vnto him and they that loue him shall be filled with the lawe They that feare the Lord will prepare their hearts and humble their soules in his sight saying we will fall into the hands of the Lord and not into the hands of men for as his Maiesly is sors his mercy From our last resolutions in the former Chapter the Reader will easily conceiue the reason why the same acts operations or practices are sometimes ascribed vnto faith as the chiefe steward or dispenser of spirituall grace sometimes vnto the affection or disposition which it moderates For as faint-heartednesse argues want of faith so patience in aduersity feare of God and constant relying vpon his mercies though springing immediatly from their proper or peculiar habits or affections are enspired and strengthened by faith as blood in the veines is by the blood arteriall 15. If we compare the seuerall growth of sted fast faith and hypocrisie they much resemble the order of composition and resolution
of the particular snares wherein they are most likely to fall is aboue my capascity without my experience and ill beseâ—ming my place God grant I may anoidâ— such as are most incident to my calling it must suffice to touch the most generall or transcendent 6. The originall of most temptations in this kinde is a secret presumption which in some breeds an expresse opinion in others onely practises thereto consequent that the receiued lawes or customes of common weales aunciently Christian are rather grounded vpon the law of God then contradictorie to any part thereof or apt to vndermine it This presumption indefinitely taken is most true but vniuersally false and dangerous howbeit many vpon this implicit perswasion that as their country Lawes and ordinances so their obedience vnto them are warranted by Gods word thinke it sufficient to examine their liues and actions by the consequent not necÌ„essarie to compare them immediately with particular rules of life and thus by taking an vniuersall liberty from an indefinite warrant become often nonconformitants to Christ by fashioning themselues continually to the Christian world He that will obseruantly peruse auncient records concerning the manner how profession of Christianity was first authorized or the Gospell publikely planted in these Nations in which it now especially flourisheth will quickly informe himselfe that the strength of secular powers before predominant was alwaies readier to root out heresies or quell errors in speculatiue points of Religion then to infringe any popular custome or repeale Lawes beneficiall to publike treasurers or priuate coffers albeit they sucke the blood of the poore or to abandon rites or fashions much applauded by braue spirits or in themselues pleasant to flesh and blood though deadly as poison to new men in Christ though apt to blast the fruites of faith and obstupefie all sence or motion of the spirit the religious and learned Viues out of Saint Austine hath obserued that customes permitted or authorised by the papacie did argue that religion to be but an imperfect mixture of Gentilisme and Christianity His words are Austines verdict is plaine enough that many things are permitted by the ancient ciuill Romaine Law which are contrary to the Lawes of God This notwithstanding they admit not who whilst they labour to wed Gentilisme with Christianitie both being corrupted neither able to brooke the other as consort retaine neither Gentilisme nor Christianisme 7 No commonwealth almost in Europe but more or lesse participates of this sault No kingdome wherein either lawes or customes receiued by â—acite consent aequiualent to lawes doe not either allow or not discountenance such practices and resolutions as flesh and blood are apt to follow yea to glorie in though as directly opposite to the nature and complete essence of Christian faith as it hath beene out of Scripture explicated as heathenish rites or lawes enacted by Romane Emperors against Christians were to the generall heads or articles of beliefe or to the profession of Christianity though to abandon fellowship with these vnfruitfull workes of darknes much more to reprooue the offendors or men in authority through whose negligence or conniuence these snares lie open to catch the simple would certainly procure disgrace from the one if not danger from the other as great as the first propagators of the Gospell amongst the Gentiles were exposed vnto by disswading from Idolatrie Notwithstanding if we would not content our selues with the bare name or title of Christianity either not regarding the principall duties thereto belonging or not considering how faith by reuolution of times alteration of publike constitutions and customes like epidemicall diseases praeualent by course or turnes doth change it aspect from such points as it was sometimes most immediately and directly set vpon vnto others of greater vse for keeeping our hearts vpright in the midst of the crooked generation wherein we liue a little obseruation would serue to rectifie our irregular thoughts and fully instructvs that our triall whether we beashamed of Christ and his Gospell before men doth as immediately lie vpon our approbation or reproouing such popular fashions or practices of our times whether by speech or other significations of our affection publike or priuate according as our calling is as the auncient professors did vpon their consenting or denying to burne incese to heathen Idols to adore Caesars image to reuile Christ or reuoke their calling I speake not of customes or prescriptions in cases of lands goods or worldly commodities For though these and the like vnwritten traditions bee like nets which may bee opened or drawne at some mens pleasures to others great losse and grieuances yet these if borne with patâ—eâ—â—e make a man neuer a whit the poorer but rather richer in faith Albeit hee that resolues to vse all aduantage of humane Lawes he can take in such matters against his brother might as well forsweare the Gospell But my purpose is briefly to touch some few resolutions either approoued by ioint consent of men as the world enstiles them because her children of best fashion for noble and heroicall or practises patronized by the multitude of practitioners or example of some men famous in ciuill estimation 8. To begin with Gentillitie taken according to the vulgar and most plausible notion it retaines the substance of Gentilisme with a light tincture of Christianity To omit vnnecessary cost in apparell whereby forraigners are enriched our natiue countrey impouerished and the poore in it oppressed To spend more in one feast or banquet then would relieue the necessities of many miserable pined impotent creatures daily presented to their eies for moe months then the parties entertained are in number is an ordinary practice of this profession much affected by many such as haue liued sometimes of almes but are desirous to transforme themselues into another shape by following fashions most applauded of their betters yet what resolution could be more flatly contradictorie then this is to that precept of our Sauiour When thou makest a dinner or a supper call not thy friends nor thy brethren neither thy kinsmen nor thy rich neighbours least they also bid thee againe and a recompence bee made thee But when thou makest a feast call the poore the maimed the lame the blinde And thou shalt be blessed for they cannot recompence thee for thou shalt bee recompensed at the resurrection of the iust Here then is one especiall point of trying their faith whom God hath blessed with store and plenty if they can assent to this commandement as true and good and delight in the practice of it whiles it comes in competition with the contrary custome so much followed and applanded by men of best place and reckoning in the worldes iudgement Forseeing the good wee haue done or left vndone to such seely ones as Christ here commends vnto our care must be the measure of our faith or infidelity of our loue or neglect of him in that day of finall accompts indulgent or remorcelesse
CHRIST as we doe but terminated his beliefe vnto the generall mercie and prouidence of God whereof the great mystery of the incarnation was the principall branch and CHRIST IESVS in the fulnesse of time exhibited in our flesh the visible fruit of life which that other IESVS did but hope for as yet in the roote not distinctly knowing it nor the vertue of it but ready actually to embrace it and feed vpon it whensoeuer it should be brought forth For as much as I haue obserued out of this speech is implied in the exegeticall repetition of it He that belieueth the Lord taketh hâ—ed to the Commaundements and hee that trusteth in him shall not be hurt there shall no euill happen vnto him that feareth the Lord but in temptation euen againe he will deliuer him 3. That wee may practice what is commaunded and yet not keepe the commandement Saint Iames hath put out of all question If yee fulfill the râ—iall Law according to the Scripture thou shalt loue thy neighbour as thy selfe ye doe well But if ye haue respect to persons ye commit sinne and are conuinced of the Law as transgressors For whosoeuer shall keepe the whole Law and yet offend in one point is guilty of all This fulfilling of the Law or keeping of the commaundements which as Solomon saith is the whole man or the whole duty whereunto man was ordained the complete and perfect Christian vertue consists of two parts a bodie and a soule The bodie is the doing of what the written Law commaunds whether by acts positiue or inhibitiue the soule is the reason or internall law of the minde which impels seuerall faculties to such acts or workes For to speake properly and scholastickely all performance of good workes commaunded or forbearance of things forbidden spring not immediately out of faith as the truncke out of the roote the branches out of the truncke or the fruit out of the branches But as the fruits of righteousnesse are of seuerall kindes and qualities so haue they seuerall faculties or affections for their proper stockes out of which they grow The auoidance of adultery fornication or whatsoeuer pollutions of the flesh with the fruites of holines contrary to these vices spring immediately from the vertues of temperance and chastity Abstinence from murder with the acts of mercy opposite to the seuerall branches thereof flourish out of the affection or vertue of humanity courtesie gentlenesse or the like So haue the acts of the affirmatiue precept contained in that negatiue thou shalt not steale as of euery other Commaundement whether positiue or inhibitiue a peculiar habite or inclination out of which they bud yet as all motion is inspired from the head albeit we goe vpon our feete or moue our hands or other member to defend our selues or serue the necessities of nature So although we are truely said to walke in Gods waies to fight his battailes or doe him seruice when we vse any facultie or affection to his glory yet is our firme assent vnto his good will and pleasure reuealed vnto vs by the doctrine â—f faith as the animall faculty which impels vs to these exercises Hence as we gather the body is dead if it want spirit or motion so as Saint Iames implies the image of God and his goodnesse or to vse another Apostles words the forme or fashion of CHRIST IESVS in vs is without life vnlesse our faith and assent vnto them haue this soueraigne commaund to impell and moue euery faculty to execute that part of Gods will whereto by the doctrine of faith it is designed And yet as the exercise of outward members increaseth internall vigor and strength and refresheth the spirits by which we moue so doe the acts of euery faculty vertue or affection righly imploied perfect faith not by communication or imputation of their perfection to it as the Romanist out of his doting loue to his faithlesse charitie dreames but by stirring vp exercising or intending its owne naturall vigor or perfection Vnlesse euery practique facultie receiue this influence from liuely faith or from the image of God or Christ which it frameth in our mindes and proposeth as a visible patterne for ouâ— imitation in all our workes thoughts and resolutions dâ—cimur vt neruis alâ—enis mobile lignum we may be operatiue as puppets are nimble in outward shew but our seeming workes of charity or best other we can pretend will be as a pish and counterfeit as their motions neither in their kinde truely vitall But as puppets are mooued wholly at his direction and bent that extends or slackes the strings whereon they dance so are our soules carried hither and thither as the diuell the world and flesh or our owne foolish affections â—osse them vsually excessiue where they should be sparing and there most sparing where they should exceed This difformity was most apparent in their workes whose reformation Saint Iames seekes for destitute of all good workes most of them were not but onely of vniformity in working They had learned to giue honour not verball but reall where honour was due duty and good respect to whom such offices belonged The rich and men of better place and fashion they did friendly and louingly entertaine which was a worke in it nature good and commendable but their abundant kindnesse towards equals or superiours became as a wen to intercept that nutriment which should haue descended to other inferiour members of CHRISTS body and by these outward exercises of magnificence their internall bowels of compassion become colde towards their poore brethren whom principally they should haue warmed and refreshed Yet such defects or difformities in their actions these halfe Christians halfe gentiles true hypocrites hoped to couer with the mantle of faith whose nature vse and properties they quite mistooke That they were not without workes the world might witnesse and no question but these enterteinments were intended as feasts of charity and with purpose to winne the fauour of the great ones with whom they liued to their profession in which respect their kindnesses might well seeme vnto themselues exercises of religion as the like doe to many of the best sort amongst vs when there is any ground of hope for gaining furtherance and countenance to good purposes as indeed with such references they are if done in fath but that this difformity in these mens workes did proceed from a precedent defect in faith is manifestly implied in that the Apostle seekes their reformation by reducing them to such an vniformity in working as can proceed onely from such true and liuely faith as hath beene described For the rectifying of faith it selfe he expresseth vnto them the exemplary forme or patterne first of the imitable perfection of the godhead then of that which is in CHRIST of both which as hath beene obserued true faith in the minde is the liue operatiue image and must imprint the like character vpon inferior faculties or affections ere their
operation become spiritually vitall Lay apart all filthinesse and superfluity of naughtinesse and receiue with meekenesse the ingrafted word which is able to saue your soules This was the word of faith which was to fructifie in their deeds wherefore he saith Be ye doers of the word not hearers onely deceiuing your owne selues And doers of it many of them were in part whence they grounded a conceipt of holinesse bringeth forth as it seemes either contemptuous or vncharitable censures of others To this disease he applies that medicine If any man among you seeme to be religious and bridleth not his tongue but deceiueth his owne heart this mans religion is vaine And seeing they held such intertainements as we speake of before because glorious in the worlds eye good and acceptable in the sight of God of whose glory and good liking they conceiued according to the customes best approued amongst men he further giueth them these imitable characters of his goodnes Pure religion and vndefiled before God and the father is this to visit the fatherlesse and the widowes in their afflictions and to keepe himselfe vnspotted from the world My brethren haue not the faith of our Lord IESVS CHRIST the Lord of glory with respect of persons This patterne Moses long before had drawne from Gods owne presence for his people to worke by circumcise therefore the foreskinne of your hearts that was to be vnspotted of the world For the Lord your God is God of Gods and Lord of Lords the Lord of glory a great God and a mighty and a terrible which accepteth no person nor taketh reward which doth right vnto the fatherlesse and widow and loueth the stranger in giuing him foode and rayment loue ye therefore the stranger for ye were all strangers in the land of Egypt 4. Want of conformity to this rule abundantly argues the leuity of their beliefe vnto such generall truths as they acknowledged The old Romane prouerbe of faith passiue or fidelitie fidem nemo perdit nisi qui non habet is more appliable to faith actiue or truely Christian No man can haue the faith of Iesus the Lord of glory with respect of persons but he that hath not the faith of Christ Iesus For he that saith he belieues CHRIT and keeps not his commaundements or rather altogether inuerts them by costly inuitations of the rich and mighty without due respect of the poore and needy is by Saint Iohns rule a liar Yet this preposterous respect of persons which is so incompatible with true faith in CHRIST as formally contrary to it patterne it was as our Apostle tels vs that made them transgressors of the Law euen whilest they did things commaunded by the Law But if ye haue respect of persons ye commit sinne and are conuinced by the Law as transgressors The head or first fountaine as well of these erroneous perswasions as of difformities in their works was want of firme assent vnto the diuine attributes or vnto the soueraigne will and pleasure of the Lawgiuer For the Apostle to prooue that assertion which containeth the reason of the former Whosoeuer shall keep the whole law and yet offends in one point he is guilty of all giueth vs that golden and metaphisicall rule by which this whole discourse hath beene framed He that said thou shalt not commit adultery said also thou shalt not kill now if thou commit no adultery yet if thou kill thou art become a transgressor of the Law a positiue or actuall transgressor by this act of murther a negatiue transgressor or non obseruer of the Law in his abstinence from adultery Nor could his supposed chastity or restraint of lust be a Christian action or truely vitall because not inspired by faith or firme assent vnto Gods will or commaundement whose soueraignty once faithfully acknowledged and established in his thougths would haue beene a like potent to haue restrained naturall inclination to murther or bloodshed acts altogether as displeasing and contrary to the will of God Quando serâ—us ex domini sui iust â—â— ea facit tantummodo quae vult facere non dominicam voluntatem implet sed suam saith Saluianus That a seruant goes cheerefully to the faire when he is bid or to supply his Maisters roome at a feast is no good argument of his fidelitie trust or diligence to doe his Masters will Many forward enough vpon these or like occasions commanded to goe a shorter errand vpon more waighty businesse when he had as good a desire or opportunity to sport or feast themselues at home would by their backewardnesse or grumbling bewray they had not learned to submit their wils vnto their masters or to preferre his businesse before their sport without which the doing of what is enioined is but an impotent and lame obedience f If a seruant say vnto his Master I will not doe as it pleaseth thee though afterwards hee doe it hee shall displease him that nourisheth him Knaues and catchpoles oft doe what the Law requires should be done yet are no true obseruers of the Law because this seruice they performe not out of faith and loialty to the Prince or Lawgiuer but in desire of gaine or some priuate respect alwaies as powerfull to make some obserue as others to transgresse paenall statutes If an Ambassador should transact such points of his instructions as make iointly for his owne aduancement neglecting others as necessary for the state his negligence in the latter would impeach his fidelity in the former albeit he did that which his Prince would haue done For he did it not because it was the Princes will it should be done but because his owne will was to haue some good done to him And perhaps one and the same humour of ambition feare or the like might cause his diligence in the one and negligence in the other and so may one and the same affection cause a man to obserue one commaundement and transgresse another But he alone obeyes Gods commaundements that wholly submits his will to Gods will that doth what God commaunds because he belieues he did commaund it that auoids what God forbids out of beliefe that God forbids it or because he knowes it to be displeasant to his goodnesse God commands all without exception to glorifie his name both in body and spirit as well as to honour father and mother or to abstaine from stealth Many can stand at open defiance with the world for any touch of disobedience in these latter which yet if out of faith they did obserue they would be as chast of their bodies as honest of their hands and equalize their diligence in duties towards their parents with deuotion towards Gods vnto whom zealous and religious praiers from out a chast and pure minde are more pleasant then honoring of father and mother then abstinance from theft and coozenage Faultinesse or negligence in the former argues a faulty diligence in the
the Scribes and Pharisees yee shall in no case enter into the kingdome of heauen What righteousnesse doth he here meane Inherent questionlesse for he presseth such an vniforme obseruation of all the Commaundements as Saint Iames doth The Scribes and Pharises did as it euen seems then calumniate him as they afterwards did Saint Paul and the Pontificians do vs stil as a destroier of the Law because he reprooued their confidence in workes and sought to establish the doctrine of faith which we now reach Needfull in this respect was that eaueat Thinke not that I am come to destroy the Lawe or the Prophets I am not come to destroy but to fulfill them Whosoeuer therefore shall breake one of these least commaundements and shall teach men so he shall bee called the least in the Kingdome of Heauen but whosoeuer shall doe and teach them the same shall be called the greatest If by the kingdome of heauen he meant the kingdome of grace the argument is more strong then otherwise it would be howsoeuer strong it is and not impeached by this reply That such obseruance of the Commaundements as is here required is necessarie to sanctification or saluation not to iustification That it should be more necessary to one of these then to another implies a contradiction in the termes well expressed and equally compared as it doth vnto our Sauiours purpose to say that workes are lesse necessarie before iustification then after it A man in that he is iustified is the immediaâ—e heire of saluation at the least acquitted from the sentence of death now if we affirme such righteousnesse more necessarie after he is iustified then before we should in congruitie grant that workes win heauen and faith only deliuers from hell or granting iustification to be the passage from death to life eternall the addition of such workes subsequent as were not precedent could be auaileable onely to supererogate some excesse of glory for though wee stood still at the same point where iustification found vs wee should be infallible heires of glorie Or if faith without workes obtaine iustification hauing iustified vs shall it not much more without them lay sure hold on saluation and all the degrees of ioy that do accompanie it Suppose a man should die in the very instant wherein he is iustified none would doubt either of absolution or saluation Is he then saued with workes or without them If without them our Sauiours rule doth faile vs for this man enters into the kingdome of heauen without more strict obseruance of the Commandements then the Scribes and Pharisees vsed without any part of that righteousnesse whereof they in some measure were partakers If with them their presence is necessarie to iustification and in order of nature before it because necessary ere he can be capable of entrance into the kingdome of heauen as performance of euery condition is in nature precedent to the accomplishment of what is not promised without it Againe no man denies but faith inherent in order of nature goes defore iustification in that sence we take it yet iustifying faith necessarily includes such workes in it as Saint Iames requires at the least a preparation or immediate promptnesse of minde to do them and more then so was not in the worke of Abraham which he commends seeing Isaac vvas not actually facrificed but offered vp by faith vnfaigned to bee sacrificed and this worke or rather thus much of it did goe before iustification either as the cause doth before the effect or as the meanes before the end for as Saint Iames sayth he was iustified by it But that perhaps in his language and intent was no more then to bee declared iust So would I answere were I Aquinas his scholler and held iustification to consist in habituall righteousnesse or grace infused Thus Bellarmine very well expounds the like speech of Saint Iohn Hee that doth righteousnesse is righteous Because of his deeds or his workes No but by them he is knowne to be righteous For he is said to be righteous that doth righteousnesse as he that moues is sayd to be liuing or the tree good that beares good fruit yet is not the tree therfore good because it beares good fruit nor doth a man liue because he moues but contrariwise the one moues because he liues the other brings forth good fruite because good so in like manner he that doth righteousnesse is righteous yet not righteous because he doth righteousnes but he doth righteousnesse because he is righteous This answere shaped by him for Saint Iohn would haue better be fitted Saint Iames as the gloze which they put vpon S. Iames would not altogether so il beseeme Saint Iohn That he had meant the second iustification whereby a man receiues increase of grace and is more iust had been harder for vs to disprooue though most improbable for them to affirme But that S. Iames should meane this second iustification as the Trent Councell without any shew of probability boldly auoucheth is manifestly disprooued by his instance in Rahab for the first righteousnesse shee euer wrought was the receiuing of the messengers and sending them out another way and yet by this worke was shee iustified in that sence Saint Iames meant not in the sight of men but of God For the drift of his dispute is to shew that without workes no man can be approoued in Gods sight howsoeuer he may perswade himselfe and others Abrahams and Rahabs workes are but branches of that religion whose practices he had commended to those his disciples as pure and vndefiled before whom Man onely No before God euen the Father The religion it selfe he exemplifies by obseruance of the affirmatiue and negatiue precepts as in visiting the fatherlesse and widowes in their distresse and by keeping themselues vnspotted of the world Bellarmines instance in Abrahams workes euidently refutes their opinion that thinke workes onely declare vs iust his allegation of Rahabs kindnesse or hospitality more forcibly ouerthrowes the Trent Counsell and his owne imagination that Saint Iames should meane the second iustification whereby a man of iust becomes more iust then which nothing can be imagined more contradictory to the Apostles meaning For who can thinke he reputed them for iust whom hee called vaine men in that they had faith without workes the same faith notwithstanding seconded with workes had as our aduersaries contend made them iust not more iust then before for now they were first to become iust being before vniust and transgressors of the Lawe as the Apostle prooues in that they had respect vnto persons The iustification therefore he sought by Rahabs example to bring them vnto vvas if so vve distinguish the first iustification whereby of transgressors they were to become new men in CHRIST and inwardly righteous not in the sight of man but of God for whatsoeuer this Apostle denies of faith without workes he attributes to faith with workes Now it is graunted by
is onely this That although men may bee truely iust and holy in respect of others and rich in all manner of workes that are good as Abraham was thus farre known and approued not by men onely but by God yet when they appeare before his tribunal who best knows as wel the imperfectioÌ„ as the truth of their integritie they must still frame their supplications sub forma pauper is yea sub forma impij alwaies acknowledging themselues to be vnprofitable seruants alwaies praying Lord forgiue vs our sinnes and bee mercifull to vs miserable sinners The onely complement of all inherent righteousnes possible in this life is this perpetuall vnfaigned acknowledgement of our vnrighteonsnesse whereby wee are made immediately capable of his righteousnesse which alone can couer our sinnes as being alone without all staine or mixture of impiety The like vnfaigned acknowledgement of their sinnes or faithfull plea for mercy the hypocrites or men deuoid of faith or grace inherent cannot possibly make as shall anon be declared This absolute necessity and vtter insufficiency of workes or righteousnesse inherent to iustification in the sight of God is as perspicuous from the Apostles instance in Dauid who had resolued this doubt Lord who shall dwell in thy Tabernacle who shall rest in thine holy mountaine with S. Iames He that walketh vprightly and worketh righteousnesse and speaketh the truth in his heart Hee had pronounced a blessing to the man that walketh not in the counsell of the wicked but setteth his delight in the Lawe of the Lord shall we imagine such a man to be without workes The Lord as he addes knoweth the way of the righteous which is as much as Saint Iames meant by iustification as much as was said to Abraham vpon that fact by which as the Apostle sayth hee was iustified For that God should know their wayes implies his approbation of their persons for men vpright and intire in respect of hypocrites and fruitlesse hearers of their workes for such as hee requires in the parties to be iustified by him Were they therfore iustified or finally acquitted by or for their works If finally acquitted then blessed likewise for them Now in opposition to this Pharisaicall conceit S. Paul directed by the Spirit who best knew the Psalmists full meaning in euery passage vpon what occasions and vnto what point hee spake directly brings in Dauid himselfe deriuing the blessednesse vsually pronounced in Scriptures to the intire and vpright in heart from Gods mercies as from it onely true and immediate cause not from their vâ—rightnesse or integrity with which it hath connexion onely finall as being applied onely to parties thus qualified none originall To him that worketh not but belieueth in him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse euen as Dauid declareth the blessednesse of the man vnto whom God imputeth righteousnesse without workes saying Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiuen and whose sinnes are couered Blessed is the man to whom the Lord imputeth no finne The man then in whose spirit is no guile for of such the Psalmist speaketh is iustified not because of his sincerity but because the Lord imputeth not that sinne vnto him which he still vnfaignedly acknowledgeth to bee in him continually praying Lord enter not into iudgement with thy seruant alwaies confessing Lord in thy sight no flesh liuing shall be iustified to wit otherwise then by not entering into iudgement or by nonimputation of his sinnes Thus you see euen the best of Gods saints seeke iustification onely by faith with Saint Paul and yet require thereto with Saint Iames Pure Religion and vndefiled in the sight of God euen the Father 7. This reconcilement of the seeming contradiction betweene these two Apostles hitherto prosecuted doth voluntarily present it selfe to such as consider the seuerall occasions of their writings and take not their speeches as they now lie most commodiously for application vnto moderne oppositions For one and the same Physician to prescribe medicines much different to diseases altogether diuerse or quite contrarie would neither impeach him of vnskilfulnesse or vnconstancy The very contrarietie of their errors with whom these two Apostles had to deale would drawe speeches from any one of vs that should seuerally entend their refutation in forme as contradictorie as theirs be yet both fully consonant to the truth because rightly proportioned to their opposite ends The Iew whose heresie S. Paul labours to auert from the Romaines and to â—oot out of the Galathians looked for a Messias immediately to crowne the conceited perfection of their workes with honour on earth and glory in heauen not one that should be the end and perfection of the Law to free them from the curse it had brought vpon them or to reconcile them vnto God by his righteousnesse To beate downe this pride there was no remedy possible besides faith in CHRIST no method so auaileable as that hee vseth first setting foorth the haynousnesse of sinne and necessity of it inherence whose consideration might deiect them afterwards prâ—ssing Gods mercies in CHRIST offered to all that would denie themselues confesse their sinnes and by faith vnsaigned relie on their Redeemers satisfaction Saint Iames disputes against the opposite error of the Libertines who presumed the merits and perpetuall mediation of CHRIST to be not onely most necessary but in themselues sufficient to saue all that did apprehend them as true although destitute of such workes as their calling required and as Gods decree exacted for the effectuall application of Christs allsufficient merits which for this reason are scarce mentioned by this Apostle because magnified they were though not too much yet amisse by the parties whom he refutes Their contempt or wanton inuerting of Gods graces offered or in part receiued was no lesse hainous or preposterous then if Bartimeus or others in his case called by our Sauiour in hope to recouer their sight should haue desired Him rather to haue made such a new sun as might make blind men see without any internall light in the eye or alteration in the organ of sight Not by any necessity of nature but by the will and purpose of the Almighty grace and righteousnesse inherent though imperfect are as necessary for effectuall adherence or vnion to CHRIST as the Christall humor of the eye or right constitution of the whole organ is for perception of colours or light externall Hence is the seeming inconuenience arising from Saint Iames his causall forme of speech 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 easilie answered For the immediate and principall cause presupposed it is vsuall to attribute a kinde of causality to the qualification of the subiect though requisite onely as a meere passiue disposition without which the principall or sole agent should want his efficacie To one demaunding why the Moonâ— should be ecclipsed when the earth is directly interposed betweene it and the body of the sunne this forme of speech would neither be improper nor
despaire of saluation In that they make such grace the sole formal cause of iustificatioÌ„ without which as all grant there is no entrance into Gods rest a Romanists trust hope or beliefe of life eternall as possible to him must first be terminated in the same degrees vnto so full a measure of grace or righteousnesse as they require either as present or possibly future He that doubts as Bellarmine confesseth â—ll mâ—st haue iust cause to doubt whether hee bee perfectly righteous or no must of necessity conceiue equall doubt of his estate in grace He that knows as who throughly examining his own heart for any space together but may know he is not able to plead for his cause with God in iustice is bound to belieue his present want of sauing grace Hee that cannot raise his heart through consciousnesse of his often transgressions much deiected to these magnanimous hopes of euer being able to fulfill the Law of God is this distrust remaining by his blinde beliefe of the Churches infalibility in this decree bound finally to despaire of saluation or any good Gods mercies or his Redeemers blood can doe him VVee are content to take Bellarmines testimony as authentique against his fellowes that our arguments prooue his former conclusion It is safest to put our whole trust and confidence in Gods mercies the vndoubted consequence whereof is that the Trent Councell did erre perniciously in so resoluing this principall point of saluation as hath beene declared But it is a wonder to behold what miraculous reconciliations the imaginary vnity of the Romane Church can worke in Iesuiticall braines Bellarmine whether out of feare of sharper censure enforced to vse this miserable shelter or so dazled with the mysticall vnity of the inerrable Church that hee could discerne no difference betwixt the Trent Councells decree and his owne conclusion takes it as approued by the Romane Church because that Church allowes the same collect wee doe vpon Sexagessima Sunday As if because he now had captiuated his vnderstanding to thinke the Church is alwaies the same and cannot erre therefore the author of that collect must needs be of the same mind the Trent Councell was when as a greater part of their best Schollers about the time it was celebrated did in this point better accord with the Auspurge confession then with it Had the doctrine contained in that collect been exhibited to the Councell by reformed Churches it had bin as peremtorily condemned as any Article of Wikliffe or Luthers doctrine but now seeing it hath slept so long in their liturgy that the sufferance of it may seeme to argue a tacite consent or approbation of that Church into whose thoughts it neuer came the author of it though for ought they know a man as obnoxious to error as we are out of all question of our opinion in the point of iustification must be thought not to haue erred in coÌ„ceiuing that praier which the Church allowes his meaning rather shall bee quite contradictory to his words More then miraculous must the composition of that body haue beene which but one in it selfe should exactly haue symbolized with euery ingredient in olde chaos yet no lesse strange may the Iesuites temper seeme were hee not homo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which can infallibly belieue euery opinion held for this thousand yeares by that Church which in respect of faith and doctrine is but one after the same manner chaos was one huge masse of contrarieties and confusions in this respect better consorting with Iesuiticall faith which is but a prime matter or indeficient seminary of various treachery as the whole body of his religion is but a meere hogepoge of dictinctions CHAP. VIII How farre the Law must be fulfilled in this life of the regiment of grace of the permanencie of iustification what interruptions it may admit how these must be repaired or in what sense it may bee said to be reiterated That euery sin is against Gods Law though not incompatible with the state of grace 1. SEeing that iustification which is by faith in Christ so much pressed by S. Paul presupposeth that state of integrity or qualification for acceptance with God whereunto S. Iames requireth workes or to vse his words the fulfilling of the royall Law of libertie without respect of persons or reserued indulgence to our desire it will be necessary briefly to examine how far the Law may be fulfilled by vs in this life or which is all one with what measure of inherent righteousnes or sanctifying grace that faith which onely iustifies must bee accompanied Now seeing the Law is but the image of Gods will or of that internall Law of righteousnesse which was in Christ whereunto faith as hath beene saide includes a conformity such a fulfilling of the Law in this life as may witnesse our true imitation of diuine goodnesse noâ— in good will or minde onely but in good workes is in this life not onely possible but requisite We must be perfect as our heauenly father is perfect which speech of our Sauiour cannot be vnderstood according to the measure of perfection nor was he himselfe as man so holy and perfect as God his father but according to the truth of the proposition for vero nihil verius we must be as truely perfect and holy according to that imperfect measure which our polluted nature is capable of as God is according to the infinite or absolute perfection of holinesse yet are wee not holy after the same manner Christ was holy or Adam in the state of his integrity It is a very fit distinction vsed by diuines in this argument that there is a twofolde perfection one of parts another of degrees whereof the former is as necessary as the other impossible to all in this life The perfection of parts may in generall be illustrated by a childe or infant which though wanting the strength and agility hath the true life and right proportion of man in euery part and able in some sort to moue euery member it hath though not by perfect motion Strong sound men in Christ Iesus we canot be in this life yet altogether dead monstrous or mishapen wee may not bee Howbeit if wee apply this resemblance to the point in question it better fits that opinion of the Diuines of Colen which held mens righteousnes inherent to bee imperfect onely in respect of the quantity then the doctrine of reformed Churches which with our best righteousnes admit a mixture of sin inherent so as this perfectioÌ„ of parts according to their teneÌ„ts may more aptly bee compared vnto a childe indued with life and rightly proportioned yet subiect to some disâ—aâ—e or infirmity able to walke but depraued in all his motions alwayes pâ—one to stumble or fall The maner as wel of sins inherence in our nature after infusion of grace as of its concurrence in our actions shal be declared by Gods assistance in the seuenth
same faith though not hypostatically yet truely vnited by such a mysticall but reall vnion as may without solecisme ground as well this denomination as our title or interest in Gods fauour More consequently by much to his owne positions might Bellarmine likewise haue granted that as we are truly the sonnes of wrath by nature albeit euery lineament of Gods image in vs be not quite razed but rather all or most much defared by Adams sinne made ours partly by reall propagation but more principally in his doctrine by imputation so we become the sonnes of God by the spirit of adoption though not so powerfull in vs as vtterly to extirpate all relickes of sin yet able so to dead the force or operation of it as it did the remainder of Gods image in vs before we were renewed by Christ Thus walking not after the flesh though in the flesh nor working sin though sin worke in vs we may through grace or this earnest of the spirit but onely for the righteousnesse of Christ whereto wee are by it vnited haue a more reall title to be enstiled his brethren sons of our heauenly father then Hee can haue as Bellarmine obiects by our doctrine he hath to be called the son of him that is the father of lies and Iesuiticall equiuocation Albeit there was no guile in him yet hee bare the punishment due to our rebellions and was not this commutation of punishment â—herby the seruants of sin are acquitted and the Lord of righteousnesse condemned sufficient to make such as are in part willing to doe for others as hee hath done for them immediately capable of absolution by his innocency of reward by his righteousnesse The a Apostle doubtlesse meant no lesse when hee saide He hath made him to be sin for vs which knew no sin that we should be made the righteousnesse of God in Him 7. The second point against which our aduersaries dash doth so euidently bewray their greatest pilots vnskilfulnesse in this hauen of saluation as euery childe that can repeate his Pater noster may easily perceiue the Trent Fathers themselues did not vnderstand it Nor can the subscribers to this decree vse that celestial prayer without plain mocking of God and Christ This imputation needs no other proofe then the cleare proposall of such positions as they now all holde de fide Take wee then one of their Catechumenies whether destitute of faith or no it skils not that hath not as yet attayned to the first iustification as they distinguish that is one destitute of habituall grace or inherent righteousnesse such a man by their Churches discipline is â—â—â—mitted or rather commanded to vse this petition amongst the rest forgiue vs our trespasses as wee forgiue them that trespasse against vs. What sinnes or trespasses doth hee request should be forgiuen him Mortall especially for their remission onely is necessary to the first iustification But how must God remit them Immediately by pardoning or forgiuing them No they are immediately remitted by actuall introduction of the contrary former grace inherent which formally expels them out of the soule as light to vse Bellarmines owne illustration of their positions in this point doth darknesse out of the aire Nor is there any possibility of remitting sinnes by other meanes left to omnipotence it selfe since the publication of Iesuiticall Comments vpon the Trent Councells decree What then is the full meaning or finall resolution of this petition whilest vttered by men as yet not iustified Lord forgiue vs our trespasses or mortall sinnes This verily and no other Lord by infusion of thy grace make vs such as shall not need of thy pardon or forgiuenesse For to holde that ouer and aboue the infusion of that grace by which the staine of sinne being clearely wiped out we are made iust Gods fauour or condonation to vse their Latine word with addition of one English letter is any way requisite for our acceptance or approbation with him is in formall tearmes the very opinion which Vasquez so peremptorily condemnes in Canus Nedina Victoria Gabriel Richardus Ariminensis Scotus and others as contradictorie to the Trent Councells oft mentioned decree and so indeede it is for by that decree being made formally iust by grace alone we become the immediate or formall obiects of Gods iustice or fidelity now strictly bound to render vs quid pro quo eternall life for grace inherent vtterly exempted from all dependance on his mercy and fauour And whereas some of their late Writers desirous to giue the Church all possible satisfaction yet partly fearing openly to wrong God or flatly to contradict his word had granted that grace infused did quite extirpate all sinne and make vs absolutely iust in our selues but yet could not by it nature or sole entitie obliterate all relation of trespasse or offence commited against God before wee had it as being vnable to make full recompence or satisfaction for them euen this opinion is now reiected as hereticall and contrary to the Councells meaning It remaines therefore that the true and full meaning of that petition in the Lords prayer forgiue vs our trespasses according to our aduersaries construction is Lord grant that we stand not in neede of thy forgiuenesse if wee suppose this petition to be conceiued either by men destitute of perfect inherent righteousnesse or such as distrust or doubt whether they haue it or no. But imagine a man could be as I thinke few Papists are more then morally certaine hee were in the state of perfect grace his vse of the same request would bee superfluous or requisite onely in respect of veniall sinnes albeit euen these if they imprint any vncomely marke or aspersion neuer so light on their soules must be taken away by introduction of the contrary forme as by acts of penitency or the like whereunto Gods concourse or aide of grace is necessarie so that his desiring God to forgiue him them is but to request his help that he may not need his fauour And though in their esteeme but a light one yet a prety mockery of God it is that after infusion of grace they should not stand in neede of his mercy or imputation of their Redeemers righteousnesse either for remitting or taking away of the staine of mortall sinnes or the punishment due vnto them and yet after God hath done all and Christs mediation as farre as concernes them fully accomplished most of them must be highly beholden to the Pope not onely in this life but after death for releasing the punishment due to veniall and petty sinnes 8 Some part of the first difficultie Bellarmine from what place of Caluin Melancthon and Chemnitius I remember not he expresseth not hath thus proposed CHRIST is our mediatour not onely in our first reconciliation but during the whole time of our life in which regard we alwayes stand in neede of his intercession and consequently alwayes sinne and transgresse the Law otherwise CHRIST after our first reconciliation
should be idle but so he is not saith Bellarmine First because he alwayes ministers strength and grace by which wee doe good works Secondly hee purgeth our daily and lighter sinnes and his blood cleanseth vs from all sinnes Or if through transgression of the law we fall away from our state of righteousnes he neuer thelesse is stil the propitiation for our sins and reconciles vs not only seuen times but seueÌ„ty times seuen times to his father if conuerted by his grace we addresse our selues to serious repentance Therfore we make not CHRIST an idle mediatour in saying the Law may be fulfilled but our aduersaries truly make his benefits vneffectuall when they teach that the excellency of his obedience could not effect that the iustification which is by the Law should bee fulfilled in vs. Whatsoeuer he thought it was safest for him to professe as hee hath written because the Trent Fathers for conclusion of that session accurse all that should say their resolutions in this point did rather disparage then set foorth the excellencie of CHRISTS sacrifice or the true woorth of his merits But the more mercifull Bellarmine makes his God the readier to forgiue our frequent trespasses the greater stil is their former mockery seeing euery time they repeat that petition they implicitely yet necessarily include the appurtenances Lord make vs such as wee shall not need of thy forgiuenesse The excesse of diuine Maiesty in respect of princely dignity presupposed their mockery of God in suing for restauration of grace after relapses into mortall sinne may for the quality be resembled by imagination of some great fauourite in the Court after many bountifull rewards for little or no seruice falling to rob or steale and lastly crauing pardon in these or like tearmes I haue grieuously offended against your Crowne and dignity but by your wonted grace I beseech you bestow as good preferment on me as before I had and amends shall quickly bee made for all the wrongs I haue done vnto my fellow subiects you shall not finde matter of death in me againe so long as your bounty towards me lasts that I shall not commit some petty sinnes of wantonnesse quarrelling drinking swearing I hope your highnesse will not expect for these are not against your Law but besides it The insolency of this imagination in a malefactour could an earthly Prince knowe the heart whence it issued would make his former offence in it self and course of common iustice meritorious of death altogether vncapable of mercy otherwise easie to haue beene obtained And is it either lesse exclusiue from Gods fauour or more prouocatiue of his seuerity to beg such grace at his hands as shall wipe out all former reckonings where with he could charge vs or hauing promised sincere obedience to the Law to elude the Lawgiuer with that distinction without which Bellarmine thinkes our Writers arguments to proue the fulfilling of the Law impossible can hardly be answered They saith he which grant as Vega doth veniall sinnes to be against the Law are enforced to hold that to keepe the Law is onely possible in as much as onely the greater part of it may bee kept whence the denomination is indefinitely attributed to the whole But what can they say to that of Iames. Hee that keepeth the whole Law and offendeth in one point is guilty of all The solide answere therefore in his iudgement is that veniall sinnes without which we doe not liue are not sinnes simply but imperfectly and in a sort neither are they against the Law but besides the Law Such as first did apply this distinction to that purpose for which the moderne Romanist now misuseth it might perhaps be in part excused by the barbarousnesse of the times wherein they liued and their ignorance in Scriptures But wee haue cause to feare that Bellarmines generall skill and knowledge in them vvas punished by GOD vvith particular grosse and palpable ignorance or blindnesse rather in thinking this quiâ—ke of wit should glue together such Oracles of the Apostles as without it would mightily iarre and start asunder As that of Iames late cited He that offends in one mortally is guilty of all and this other In many things we al offend 1. venially or these two of S. Iohn He that is borne of God sinneth not If we say we haue no sin we deceiue our selues So doubtlesse they do and mightily mistake both these great Apostles meaning that thinke any in this should be so righteous as not to stand in neede of Gods fauour for absolution from sins committed against his Law but of their meaning in the Chapter following 9. These discussions may informe the Reader that Bellarmines conclusion of this controuersie wherein hee may seeme vnto the vnobseruant to attribute somewhat to Gods mercies in the businesse of iustification after grace infused was but like the first inuitation of an Italian onely for fashion sake For if his authority could haue moued any of his profession after fulnesse of grace to haue tasted the louing kindnesse of the Lord he could not be ignorant that the Trent Councell had shut the doore vpon them It is the safest way saith he * to put our whole trust in Gods mercies VVhy so because there is no trust or confidence to be put in our owne good workes or fruits of grace No rather because it is more easie to grow proud of our deeds then to be assured of our sincerity in doing them But if neither safe it be to trust in them nor by his doctrine to any purpose without them to trust in Gods mercies hee hath left his Romane Catholikes in a miserable case VVhat is it then they can hope or desire Gods mercies should doe for them To remit their sinnes How By not imputing them this is all they can condemne in vs. VVhat then to set heauen open vnto them without remission of sinnes or iustification This is more then can be laid to any heritickes charge none euer liued but granted iustification to bee a necessary gate through which all that haue sinned must enter into heauen It remaines then the onely ground of all hope or trust a Romanist can haue of any good from Gods mercies must be his precedent perswasion or beliefe of absolute and perfect righteousnesse either now inhabiting his soule or hereafter to be obtayned That is hee must trust God one time or other will be so mercifull to him as he shall not stand in neede of his mercie at the houre of death 10. He that wold clearly conuince the Romish church or her childreÌ„ of a capitall crime vsually obiected by our writers shold begin w th the vertual intentioÌ„ of the priest by rigid positions of their late writers most necessarily required to the effectual working of the Sacraments for that euidently breedeth doubt whervnto if we adioyne this absolute necessity of compleat habitual grace inherent for remission of sins it openly condemnes the Trent Councell it selfe for nursing