You may seem to disparage the learned too much as if confining or ascribing all the promises to the Gospel or accounting them to be Gospel they should deny any promise to appertaine to the law Whereas I think you cannot alleadge one learned Author who doth not grant the law to have its promises also yea and to make this difference also between legal and Evangelical promises that the Evangelical are free and absolute the legal conditional Promiss alia conditionales aliae gratuita yet never read I of any hard or undue expressions cast upon the law as you insinuate If the curse be not sometime expressely set down yet it is implicite and necessarily included wher-ever the law is mentioned taking it for law moral but you reserve this to a future time and so it is referred M. B. pa. 141. In the moral law is required justifying faith and repentance c. the second commandment requireth the particular worship of God insomuch that all the ceremonial law yea our Sacraments are commanded in the second commandment Answ 1. You may as well say also that the judicial law is included in the first commandment and the second table and so jumble and confound all in one law which in their delivery nature use and end are so distinct 2. Justifying faith is so called only from the object of it unto which it hath respect Non aliunde nos salutem quam ex evangelio consequi quoniam non alibi suam nobis justitiam Deus patefacil quae sola nos ab interitu leberat Calv. but this object is not propounded in the moral law for the soul to have respect unto therefore it is an error to teach that justifying faith properly so called is required in the moral law and a confounding of law and Gospel The righteousness of God is the object of justifying faith therefore it is called the righteousness of faith also Rom. 10.6 and that in opposition to the righteousness of the law v. 5. and it is only revealed in the Gospel whence Paul inferreth it to be the power of God to salvation Rom. 1.16 17. and the Gospel is preached for the obedience of this faith Rom. 1.5 that is to call and bring men unto this justifying faith but if the law do it it is not the proper office and end of the Gospel 3. What requireth repentance must necessarily propound a promise of pardon and acceptance unto the penitent but the moral law knoweth nor offereth no such mercy to any sinner 4. God cannot be rightly worshipped nor known but in Christ the Mediator by whom alone we have access with boldness and confidence Deus nisi in Christo suo coli nec cognosci Eph. 3.12 but the law teacheth not Christ 5. And if our Sacraments be commanded in the second commandment then they were commanded the Jews for whatever the law requireth it is of them that live under it as did the Jews Rom. 3.19 but I hope our Sacraments were not commanded them to use yea and we by that are to be circumcised who now have the second comman dment 2. If all the ceremonial law be commanded there then the ceremonial doth not differ in nature and kind from the moral but as a part from the whole Where is the specifical dissirence then so that you have vainly distinguished the law into moral ceremonial and judicial many other arguments might be used to let you see your great mistake but I forbear in a case so clear M. B. The moral law hath more particulars then can be in the law of nature hence the Apostle saith he had not known lust to be sin had not the law said so c. Ans As the moral law is not so comprehensive as to containe justifying faith and repentance so neither do you evince it to be more extensive or large then the law of nature having more particulars then be in that these be your private crotchets How will it stand with the justice of God to require more then was given to our nature at first And the invalidity of your reason is evident for though the Apostle had not known lust by it yet you know that much of that law lyeth dead and obscure in us there be many seeds and remanents of it which to us be imperceivable till the Ministery of the moral law do fetch those sparks from under the ashes revive and bring them to light And lust lurketh in our corrupt nature as fire is in the slint not known nor taken notice of till the law as the steel beat it out and cause it to sparkle abroad but it followeth not that the moral law containeth more because it revealeth more 2. You take the natural law as it is obliterated and imperfect in our corrupt nature and the moral law in its perfection an unequal comparison 3. The sin of lust was there before the law came now if there were not a law of nature or in nature against which it was how came it to be sin by what law had it a being for the knowledge of it you say was only by the moral law As you pass along you are ever and anon like a rash and passionate Schoolmaster lashing your adversaries without cause accusing them as guilty of crying down the law preaching against it reviling it c. and the like aspersions you cast upon them which argue and bewray too much gall and distemper in you but such passages I pass over being minded not to reply to every extravagant expression but only to give satisfaction in what is material LECT XVI Exod. 20.1 And God spake c. LAstly observe in general that God did not give them his law till he had humbled them Answ The principal end of giving the law is that by it as an instrument God may humble us beating down that pride and presumption in our spirits conceiting and boasting of what we neither have nor are M. B. p. 151. To signifie that the law could not be a way of justification Ans And yet you said but lately that the law requireth justifying faith to what end is it if it show no way to justification nor cannot justifie as you say afterward or how can it then be a covenant of grace M. B. God doth use the law as he doth his whole word to beget and increase the life of grace in us and in this effect of the law to increase life David doth often commend it Ans 1. There be two principal and essential parts of the Covenant of Grace 1. To hold out the way of justification peace and life 2. To promise and give the Spirit of regeneration and renovation So Jer. 31.33 34. and Ezek. 36.25 26. And the law doth neither of these therefore it is no covenant of grace 2. There is nothing more against Scripture and the maine current of all true divinity then to teach that the life of grace is begot by the law Here are two great
could not save by faith and salvation now not to be sought by grace onely in Jesus Christ saith the Margent But we believe through the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ to be saved even as they Fathers do Learned Zanchy stateth the question between Paul and the false teachers to be An praeter Christum c. whether besides Christ good works also be necessary to salvation Mr. B. And if this should be the sense of the Text then it was clear that the Galatians were not made partakers of Gods spirit by the corrupt doctrine that was taught them of late by their Seducers but before while they did receive the pure doctrine of Christ and therefore it was their folly having begun in the spirit to end in the flesh this may be a probable interpretation Answ Yet these exceptions may be against the latter part 1. The question made by the Apostle is divisive whether they received the Spirit by the doctrine of faith or by the other for by one they must needs have it And not whether they received the spirit by both doctrines conjoyned and confounded so that you mistake the form of the question 2. They begun in the spirit while they abode in the doctrine of Christ for righteousness and salvation onely and their folly in ending in the flesh was in that besides the righteousness of faith they would have also works of the law for salvation for this is to end in the flesh that is in themselves having begun in Christ by the spirit or as saith Piscator this is called an ending in the flesh because it is a way both heavy and impossible Mr. B. That which I shall stand upon is this The Jews and false Apostles when they went furthest joyned Christ and the observance of the moral Law equally together for justification and salvation whereas the Law separated from Christ did nothing but curse and condemn not being able to help the soul at all Answ It is as probable if not more as I said that they held Christ sufficient to justifie but not to save without works 2. They joyned Christ and the Law for justification and salvation say you And you joyn them for sanctification and salvation so no such great difference 3. If the Law separated from Christ did nothing but accuse and condemn then it seemeth if it be joyned with Christ it will acquit and justifie or you think it hath left that power to condemn being joyned to Christ Came Christ to take that power from the Law or to mitigate and meeken it by uniting it to himself or to redeem his elect from under the Law to live and abide where no Law is to accuse Rom. 8. Who can lay any thing to their charge Is not Christ also our sanctification and redemption as well as our justification without the Law 1 Cor. 1.30 This doctrine is of God saith Paul there but yours is but of man Also you disclaim that the Law of it self is able to stirre up the least Godly affection in us but Christ and Law together can and not Christ without it If the soul be married to Chist her husband he cannot make her to bring forth fruits to God but Moses the former dead husband must be raised up again and so the beleiver hath two husbands to make him fruitfull and both at one time a thing utterly against the Law and the Ordinance of Mariage civill or spirituall for as in the civill two are thereby become one flesh so they that are joyned to Christ are one spirit 1 Cor. 6.17 Mr. B. More places of Scripture are brought against this but they will come in more fitly under the notion of the Law as a Covenant Answ It 's true there are many more pag. 165. of the Assert unto which as many might be added but you have enough of these the rest you reserve to a more fit occasion And I had thought to have enlarged this point but that it is lost labour and I may ill spare any Mr. B. Thus therefore I shall conclude this point acknowledging that many learned and orthodox men speak otherwise and that there is a difficulty in clearing every particular about this question but as yet that which I have delivered carrieth the more probability with me Answ I thank you for your ingenuous and free acknowledgement I am not alone in this my opinion as yet I think you are in yours for any thing I mean that can be read in the Orthodox for otherwise the whole Colledge would not have given you such hearty thanks and your book so superlative commendation if they inclined not your way 2. Whereas you find difficulty that is because you have taken the staffe by the wrong and worst end contending against the clear truth I will not say against the light and checks of conscience But the more difficult the more fit for one of your quality and parts to encounter with that so your victory might happily have been more glorious Yet you have brought it no further even in your own thoughts but to be questio probabilis and you found it in as perfect condition and state when you entred upon it nay I say more I never read that it was controverted by any Protestant till now but your words imply that you may be of another mind to morrow The Lord instruct and establish us Mr. B. And I will give one Text more which I have not yet mentioned that is Act. 7.38 where the moral Law is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the lively cracles that is not verba vitae but verba viva vivificantia so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 giving life not that we could have life by vertue of obedience to them but when we by grace are inabled to obey them God of his mercy bestoweth eternal life Answ Before you were onely defensive sheilding your self as busily as you could against those Scriptures that fought against you but now you are disposed to give your adversary one stroke and yet the arm or weapon rather will not serve to fasten one blow either to hurt or fright this is but a childish skirmish or flourish It is granted the moral Law may be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lively oracles or words and so it is in its own nature yea and in the Ministry of it life is propounded as Deut. 30.19 I have set before you life and death and Levit. 18.5 Ye shall keep my statutes and my judgements which if a man keep he shall live in them but this life it promiseth to give is upon such tearms and impossible conditions that as yet none was quickned by it but contrarily it brought death upon all by reason of that poysonfull enmity and maliciousness of our common nature whereupon Paul is bold and peremptory to affirm that all that are of the works of the Law are cursed Gal. 3. this inbred enmity is discovered but not cured by
the consent or opinion of Divines as the best yea sole reason and warrant you have for this whereas you regard not their concurrence in other things 4. Your inference is as strange viz. That there must then necessarily be grace included in the morall Law for suppose your reducement be true yet the same grace was still contained and kept in the ceremoniall as before and it could import no whit of its native vertue or as a physicall ingredient infuse its spirit strength or force to alter and qualifie the Law of works for then grace were no more grace nor works no more works If you make the morall so capacious as to receive into it the other as a greater Orbe the lesser or as your Chest doth a box of oyntment or the Ark the Pot of Manna yet there is no necessity of any influence from one into the other or of any thing to be poured out of one vessell into another but all that grace of remission of sins c. was still preserved and kept in the ceremoniall Law and so no grace in the morall 4. If the Apostle did speak as much against the ceremoniall as morall Law was it not because the people had no further respect then to the act observance or thing done resting in the bare use without faith in Christ the onely treasure hid and propounded in and by them and so they made that to be worke which was grace and so no difference between ceremoniall and morall things Sincere accepâ—â— non sunt proâ—â—ie opera hoâ—â—num sed â—â—ei nam niâ—â—l agimus sed â—â—ferimus nos â—â—eo ad recipiâ—â—ndam ejus â—â—vatiam Cal. And being thus perverted the continuance and use of circumcision and the sacrifices did oppose Christ and grace though they did not so as they were instituted and commanded by God to be used Sacrifices and Sacraments be Gods Ordinances which rightly understood and taken and purely used are not properly mans works but Gods He propoundeth and commendeth thereby unto us his grace and the work of redemption by Jesus Christ the sole object that our faith is to look at and to be exercised about in the use of them If we handle them sincerely we bring no work nothing for acceptation with God but onely are receivers of what he freely giveth unto us It s an easie and too common an errour to turn all into works even Baptism and the Lords Supper whereby the simple nature and verity of them is extinguished and lost Christ profiteth none but such as despairing of Law and works do by faith she onely unto the promise of his grace If a man seek help or comfort in any one act or work he is then bound to seek the same in all the works of the Law and so is a debter to fulfill the whole Law and is quite fallen from grace so is it Gal. 5.2 3 4. Behold I Paul say unto you that if you be circumcised namely in that perswasion that that act will avail you any thing Christ shall not profit you at all c. 5. Lastly This say you hath been alway a strong Argument to perswade you c. And there appeareth no strength in it but it is as weak silly and poor as any and whereas you say alwaies I understand you thus viz. since you entertained that conceit that the Law of works is a Covenant of grace by a mistake herein you might be confirmed in that errour but what bred or occasioned that opinion at first And we now having the same morall Law how is it if the ceremoniall be included in that second Commandment that it doth not bind us also to sacrifice be circumcised c. as it did the Jews else we have not all in the Law Mr. B. This will appear from the visible seal to ratifie the Covenant Argn. 5 which was by sacrifices and sprinkling the people with blood and this did signifie Christ the Mediatour of this Covenant Answ Interpreters vary about the meaning of that Covenant-book or Testament that was sprinkled with blood Exod. 24. If you will contend it was the Law largely taken even for what was delivered on Mount Sinai In which large acceptation that Law blood of sprinkling and other ceremonies then used were typicall and shadows of future good things Heb. 10.1 then you exclude the Morall Law strictly taken as a rule of righteousness for it was not typicall And now what have you gained by making this a Covenat of grace which the Jews lived under or where or what grace is found in the morall Law But when Moses took the blood and sprinkled it on the people and said Behold the blood of the Covenant which the Lord hath made with you Exod. 24.8 your Marginall note telleth you It was to signifie that the Law being broken by us could alone be satisfied by the blood and death of Christ Let Moses be typicall Mediatour yet it followeth not that it was not a covenant of works if you take it for the Law morall but contrarily that it was no other for a Mediator was therefore needfull because by the Law the people were convinced that there was dissention and variance between God and them in that they were proved to be transgressors of that his Law and the enmity was to be slain and abolished and a reconcilement made by a middle person Argn. 6 The residue of this Section I leave as dubious and obscure of whom you mean I know not Mr. B. If the Law was that same Covenant with that Oath God made to Isaac then it must needs be a Covenant of grace But c. Therefore God remembers what he had promised to Abraham Deut. 7.2 It shall come to pass if ye hearken to these judgements and do them that the Lord thy God shall keep unto thee the Covenant and mercy which he sware unto thy Fathers Answ Nothing is more evident by this place then that the Law requiring these judgements to be hearkened unto and done was a distinct doctrine from that Covenant made with them in their Fathers For 1. God requires of them the doing of the one but promises that he himself will keep the other the Covenant and the mercy so that this wholly rests and relyeth on him 2. He calls and commendeth himself first to be the Lord their God not upon condition of their doing or obedience but before he required it and as the ground of commanding it 3. The Covenant and mercy was made long before and confirmed by Oath in the dayes of their Fathers these stand all in that text fully against you and for us Yet he dealing with them as a Father with his Children is willing to manifest his faithfulness and love in keeping Covenant and promise made long before in that way of their obedience and dutifulness but that he made that Covenant the same with the Law is denied as utterly false If you say to your Child he shall find you a loving and kind
grant the Law to be a perpetual and inviolable Rule of Righteousness but that it is a Rule to a Believer quatenus talis he will not grant 2. It is true it hath vim praecepti as well as doctrinae and so it hath vim damnandi a power to curse as he there affirmeth and you neither have nor can refute M. B. What will he say to the Law given to Adam who yet was righteous and innocent and therefore could not be cursing or condemning of him Ans You mean not that the Law had no power to curse and condemn because Adam was innocent for you grant it had that potentially though not actually If then it did not actually curse it was not because the Law wanted that power but in that state of innocency there was no place nor reason actually to curse Henceforth wonder not at the Author for saying the Law hath power to curse which is denyed by Dr Taylor and your self but wonder at your own oversight who while you would oppose and confute your Adversary do grant and affirm all he requireth And yet in your Lect. 6. you deny this power to curse to be any essential part of the Law When Adam had sinned whether did the Law actually condemn or no If yes I demand then whether it were by that authority and power it had before or some new and further power was given it upon the fall Did not the Law say to him yet in innocency What day thou eatest of that tree thou shalt dye Gen. 2. How was it that it threatened death and forbad the eating under such a fearful penalty if it had yet no power to execute and inflict the same You must now yield and cease or fight on with your own shadow M. B. In respect of the Vse of the Law to Believers It hath this Vse 1. To excite and quicken them against all sin and corruption c. because none of the godly are perfectly righteous and there is none but may complain of his dull love and his faint delight in holy things therefore the Law of God by commanding doth quicken him c. Have not Believers Crookedness Hypocrisie Luke-warmness Ans The love of God in Christ revealed and shed abroad in the heart doth quicken but the simple Command of the Moral Law can never effect what you say He that loveth the Lord hateth sin but we love the Lord not by reason of the Law requiring it but because he hath loved us first 1 Ioh. 4.19 and that we be born of God and know God in his Son It 's strange Divinity that the flesh and wickedness of our nature should be cured or weakened by the Law It may discover the malady or disease but not remedy it Put the Law to the old man it will revive and quicken it indeed but not to goodness if we may believe either Scripture or our own experience The strength of sin is the Law 1 Cor. 15.56 And Rom. 7.9 When the Commandment came sin revived and I dyed Such is the poysonful enmity in us by the first Adam that it maketh head against the plaister of the Law being applyed unto it The old man or flesh is enmity to God and all goodness Rom. 8.7 and the more it is stirred and quickened by the Law the more it is enraged But contrarily the Head of the Body that is the Church is Christ from whom it hath nourishment ministred and so increaseth with the encrease of God and by this means the body of sin is weakened and abolished Colos 2.19 Our Sanctification is not begun nor perfected by legal precepts and pressings but by our true and effectual union with Christ Ioh. 15.4 As the branch cannot bear fruit of it self except it abide in the Vine no more can ye except ye abide in me Verse 5. He that abideth in me and I in him the same bringeth forth much fruit for without me ye can do nothing M. B. In the third Use of the Law pag. 9. How absurd then are they that say the preaching of the Law is to make men trust in themselves and to adhere to their own righteousness Ans It may be truly said that too many so preach the Law that they establish mans righteousness for this is in the mouth of divers The Minister saith Do well and have well and we are taught That the way to come to glory in Heaven is to glorifie God on Earth by good works Christ saveth none but holy ones c. If the Law were used to discover sin not to cover it to weaken and destroy not to strengthen and build up to binde and cast out not to loose release and admit if the Vail were taken off Moses face and the glory of God in his fiery and terrible Law did break forth so that all found it to be a Ministration of death and condemnation this would be a mean to kill and overthrow all self-confidence and boasting But who doth make that use of it Not one of twenty and your self cannot receive the Law and digest it under such a terrifying and damning notion M. B. pag. 11. The Antinomian before he speaks any thing against or about the Law must shew in what sence the Apostle useth it Ans Your Antinomian is as good a friend to the Law as your self neither do you nor yet can you make it appear that he speaks one word against the Law You are too bold in saying that the Apostle argueth against the Law in any sence but if you so charge him your Conscience may give way to slander us M. B. 5 Caution pag. 13. To distinguish between a Believer and his personal acts Believers sins are condemned they are guilty of Gods wrath though not their persons Ans This your nice and groundless distinction was Dr Taylors shift as it is yours You might have seen the vanity of it in the Assertion of Grace or at least have considered how to satisfie the Objections against it before you present the world with it afresh 1. The Scripture maketh the guilt and curse to redound upon the person as Gal. 3.10 Cursed is every man that continueth not in all things which are written in the Book of the Law to do them 2. In your dayly repentance or confession you make in your prayers do you not judg and condemn your self for your sins whereof Conscience doth accuse you What a strange expression is it that sins are guilty of Gods wrath 3. If no guilt redound upon the person there is no more need of Christs blood to cleanse acquit and justifie and to be a continual propitiation for sin The Promise is vain and Faith of no effect unless you will say that you believe dayly to secure not your person but your sins from wrath 4. And the true reason why the sin guilt and curse redound upon any person is because he is put and placed under the Law which revealeth wrath and why all is kept off the Believer it
is not because the Law hath lost its power to accuse and condema as you would bear us in hand but because he is not under the Law but under Grace Rom. 6.14 Gal. 4.4 Christ hath satisfied for him taking all his sins guilt and curse unto and upon himself and God hath justified and set him free so he liveth in peace and at rest by Faith in Christ who loved him and gave himself to redeem him Also the grace and benefit of his Justification doth in some sort redound upon the actions of a Believer For was it not by his Faith that Abels sacrifice pleased God Heb. 11.4 There is no such purity perfection or dignity in the best thing you can do which of it self simply considered can procure or finde acceptance with God The Scripture and all Orthodox Divinity do hold forth Christ only as the ground and reason of all acceptation of man his works and ways 1 Pet. 2.5 Ye are an holy Priesthood to offer up spiritual sacrifice acceptable to God by Jesus Christ You say Dr Crisp is wide and see not your self out of the way of Truth and Charity A man under grace is no more under the Law he is dead to the Law that he may live to God Gal. 2.19 M. B. 6 Caution Law is not to be decryed because we have no power to keep the Law Ans Who cryeth down or speaketh against the Law You cannot shew or name any And who are so much against the Law as your selves who are become vain and needless Advocates for it The blinde Pharisees pretended most zeal for God and his Law who were yet in the state of enmity and by reason of their inward malice and envy against Christ opposition and hatred of the truth of his Doctrine false accusations and seeking to entangle and bring him into danger they lived in the continual breach of the Law Well it is too evident that you with thousand others of your Fraternity cease not to quarrel with except against and to condemn us for Antinomians and yet no demonstrative proof is extant of any such Error or guilt It is easie to lay on load of accusation upon Innocency it self hence such aspersions and indignities cast upon David Paul and that immaculate Lamb Christ himself if the corrupt heart within give way and be bent thereunto How weak is thy heart seeing thou hast done all these things Ezek. 16. The weakest and worst sort have been the most zealous and confident accusers We know say the Jews that this man Christ is a sinner Joh. 9.24 yet they knew no such thing by him What accusation saith Pilate bring you against this man They answered If he were not a Malefactor we would not have delivered him unto thee Ioh. 18.29.30 If so many of that Religion say it it is unquestionably true though there be no reality nor jot of verity in the accusation yet know it that it is an Antinomian part to slander and miscal and to make no crime to appear Thus may the greatest delinquency and guilt of Antinomianism be layd at yours and your fellows doors There is one that accuseth you even Moses in whom you trust Joh. 5.45 M. B. Ibid. It is an expression that an Antinomian * Dr. Crisp useth The Law saith he speaketh to thee if troubled for sin Do this and live Now this is as if a Judg should bid a Malefactor If thou wilt not be hanged take all England and carry it upón your shoulders into the West Indies What comfort were this Now doth not the Gospel when it bids a man believe speak as impossible a thing to a mans power Answ Doth the Doctor in this saying decry the Law Your own words and judgment too do import the like impossibility What a sinister minde is this But all if voyd of prejudice and partiality may clearly see by this his expression that Doctor Crisps main desire design and scope was to instruct erect and comfort a poor distressed and troubled Soul and that therefore he so applyed and ministred Gospel-Cordials Observe the ground and reason of his words if thou be troubled for sin and then you have no cause so to reprove and censure him as you do 2. His counsel and direction differ much from theirs of your way who in such a case bid the dejected man to desire promise and endeavor his utmost to do and walk according to the Law and so put him in hope of mercy in that as it is taught the Law is mitigated Evangelized God accepteth the will for the deed c. The Doctor wisely telleth him of the impossibility of making his peace that way knowing also how apt every one is to take that course that so he may utterly despair of himself self-doings and active righteousness and more readily hearken to the voyce and tydings of the Gospel only And 3. though to believe be as impossible to mans natural power yet it followeth not but that he is rightly put upon the believing the Gospel as Paul did bid the Jaylor Act. 16. to believe in the Lord Jesus that he might be saved The believing way is the only way of life peace and Salvation and the Gospel is to be preached for the obedience of Faith Rom. 1.5 You seek a knot in a rush M. B. 7 Caution I much wonder at one speaking thus The Law doth not only deprive us of comfort but it will let no body else speak a word of comfort because it is a rigid keeper and he consirmeth it by that place Gal. 3.23 But how short this is appeareth 1. Because what the Apostle calleth the Law here he called the Scripture in general before 2. He speaks it generally of all under that form of Moses his Regiment so that the fathers should have no comfort by that means Answ Your Margin might have directed us to the Author or Book if not to the page and place where that had been candid for the circumstances there would have given much light Many sentences of your own if singled separated from what precedeth would speak strangely and make a harsh sound I think that the expression which occasioneth so much admiration in you is either D Crisps or some other reputed Antinomians and his words are Allegorical Though Pauls friends had free access and might minister unto him Acts 24.23 yet many a Martyr in Queen Maries time had not that favor So the Law being a spiritual Jaylor to the Conscience suffereth none in a Legal way to comfort it no work no duty performance or reformation nor man nor Angel The Law came by Moses but Grace Pardon Peace Favor Life Consolation by Jesus Christ 2. That place Gal. 3.23 doth sufficiently confirm it and hath been used for that purpose by such Divines as you have no exception against 3. Your Reasons are invalid For first That Scripture in general is the Law or nothing in the Scripture but the Law which concludeth all under sin Verse 22.
Sion-Colledge But this I am bold to say that this is not that Law or Doctrine which came first out of Gods Sion Isa 2. If you teach thus then no man can dare to beleive or receive remission of sins through Christs blood till he be sure he finde first the presence of good works and when will that be that a man can finde good works before he believe or what are the good works he must so necessarily finde and unto which the pardon is promised you might have done wisely and it had been a special work of charity to have given instance in some and then to have shewed both how those good works may be done in the state of unbelief and also how they may be certainly known to be good before faith O poor sinful and trembling soul into what an inextricable labyrinth will this bring thee and when thou shalt be deeply plunged into temptation how to prevent thy fearful desperation by this doctrine is utterly impossible 2. By this you will make people look more to good works then to Christ present and formed in the heart the only hope of glory Col. 1.27 And he that hath Christ hath life and he that hath not the Son hath not life whatever works he may pretend to have 1 Joh. 5.12 3. Yea a legal Ministery exhorting to duties performances and conformity to the Law of works will be held sufficient and men need not be bid to examine themselves whether they be in the faith and Christ dwell in them or no 2 Cor. 13.5 but whether they have store of good works and so they may be sure of pardon and salvation But Sir If you will have your Doctrine to have a free passage why do you not prove clear and confirm it your word will not bear and warrant a Tenet of this weighty importance and consequence Where finde you God speaking to the work or not rather to the worker and if the promise be made also to him of pardon or life it is for his faith or rather for Christs sake in whom all the promises are yea and Amon unto the glory of God 2 Cor. 1.20 Gal. 3.16 On that ever such a Doctrine should see the Sun be heard out of any our Pulpits and be suffered to pass the Press and with such applause to be published That good works must necessarily be present when we be justified and God should so respect and love them that he promiseth pardon and eternal life to them or to their presence you mean sure to the man for their presence sake for if they be so good and holy Etiam bona opera egent remissione they need no pardon or if they were not first pardoned by what art become they good If you say yet you will have Christ present too he need but stand as a cypher the promise is not to his presence but to the presence of holy duties Mr. B. Lastly Their ground is still upon that false bottom because our sins are laid upon Christ Answ You need wish to have your words well taken if you dare not build upon it as an infallible verity that your sins are laid on Christ yet others dare and the bottom is firm even a sure Rock when you have done all You add May they not be laid upon us in other respects to heal us and to know how bitter a thing it is to sin against God Answ 1. If the laying of sin on us will heal us what did make us sick or sore the wound is by sin 2. Then our health is not by laying them on Christ and discharging of us or by faith in him by the means of whose stripes we are healed Isa 53.5 2. That phrase of Gods laying of sin upon the justified in any respect is no Scripture-phrase but it is full of danger and most agreeable to the principles of reason a natural conscience and the Law 3. How bitter sin is may best be seen when we see and consider it upon Christ who under the heavy weight of it sweating water and blood cryed so out My God my God why hast thou forsaken me I grant the afflicted conscience knoweth some little of it and if ever God lay sin upon you and let you not see it laid on Christ for your full and final discharge it will then be intolerable Mr. B. 4. In denying them to be signes or testimonies of grace or Christ dwelling in us And here one would wonder to see how laborious an Author is to prove that no inherent grace can be signs c. Answ 1. They can be made no further evidences then it is evident and plain that they arise from true faith and then I must first know that I have faith and be assured I am justified else all such signs will leave me uncertain and may prove to be counterfeits For as this Argument holdeth not Here is light therefore the Sun is up for all light is not from the Sun the Moon and the Candle have proper lights also so all that we call graces and holy duties come not from faith nor are not only found to be in him who is in a justified estate and therefore cannot convincingly argue such an estate VVhat can you instance in being materially good that was not in Paul while he was a Pharisee who was blameless as touching the Law I fear me that it contenteth us that we know teach and profess a Christ crucified and come not to finde Christ truly formed and dwelling in the heart whose presence is the only light peace consolation and rest to the Soul and that is the reason of our eying and requiring of works and graces for testimonies and assurances of a good estate M. B. In answering the Author We may shew briefly how many weak props this discourse leaneth upon 1. In confounding the instrumental evidencing with the efficient Not holy works say they but the Spirit How he doth oppose subordinates Answ The Spirit and works are not subordinate for as is shewed works may be where the Spirit of adoption and faith is not 2. Neither can they be subordinate except the Spirit do infallibly reveal and confirm a good estate by them which you cannot make good Again you say Every man is in darkness and like Hagar seeth not a fountain till his eyes be opened Answ That is true but where do you read that our duties or works do open the eyes and clear this unto us The opening of the eyes is a good work indeed but it is Gods work and not ours Eph. 1.17 M. B. We say that a Christian in time of darkness and temptation is not to go by signs c. Answ And out of darkness and temptation what need is there to put them to that use will you light a candle at noon-day when there is light enough 2. when there is no temptation occasioning the questioning of faith or the estate what need is there to prove either M. B. 3. His arguments go
regenerate to Faith Rom. 10. and to confirm and build up in that way which you nor any can truly affirm of the Law Now this your Rock is passed by without danger M. B. The Swinckfeildeans upon like ground deny the whole Scripture to be needful to a man that hath the Spirit and that which the Antinomian doth limit to the Law that it is a killing letter they apply to the whole Scripture and I cannot see how they can escape this Argument Answ I see with a little help the light may so shine forth that there is hope you will prove ours however we are not here non-plussed See the errour of the Swinckfeild and your own weakness first if we were perfectly holy and happy as in Heaven and Glory we should not need the Scripture no more then the Angels do 2 But we are so onely imperfectly and inchoatly so that the Scriptures are still requisite and needful that we may increase with the increasings of God Ephes 4.12 for the perfecting of the Saints Till we come to the unity of the Faith unto a perfect man unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ 3 Again your friend the Antinomian doth not call the Law a killing letter as it is without the Spirit but as it is that instrument or the ministration the Spirit useth to kill and condemn as touching Conscience 2 Cor. 3.9 I was alive without the Law once but when the Commandment came sin revived and I died Rom. 7.9 But this may serve now viz. The Law can but direct in the things of the Law where you can finde no Christian estate nature name way life faith nor hope of his Calling nor to speak properly any thing of Christianity How now shall your Law direct in these things M. B. The Law must needs have a directive regulating and informing power over a godly man as will appear by these two Reasons First we cannot discern the true worship of God from superstition and idolatry but by the first and second Commandment Answ Here is a large field Inopem copia facit this requireth a full Treatise it self as for the explicating it in such manner as may satisfie mens minds being concerning this full of darkness and doubts so for the general necessity of some cleer and special light to be held forth for the informing and directing aright a world of people going far wide through want of this true knowledge In brief thus for the present First God was not onely a God unto his people but had made known also himself unto them before the solemn giving of the Law and he gave not the Law that by the observation and works of it he might be their God and they his people nor yet that thereby they might know and conceive of him in their hearts according to that Law of works And therefore is it observable that he beginneth with these words Hear O Israel I am thy God c. Now as he became their God onely by Christ the promised seed in the face of whom the knowledge of his glory is manifested 2 Cor. 4.6 so his redeemed and peculiar were onely to take notice of him as God in Christ reconciling them to himself blessing all in the alone Messiah giving out all peace life through him and vouchsafing all favour and respect onely in reference unto him To this dispensation manner and kinde of revealing himself to mankinde according to that first promise Dem nisi in Christo suo coli aut cognosci nolit Calv. Gen. 3.15 The seed of the woman shall bruise the serpents head and in him shall all the Nations be blessed are all to attend for God will not be known nor worshipped out of his Christ Now mans heart naturally is a shop of idolatry infinite are the forms conceptions and images which we frame and have of God within us And as our inward Notions are under which God cometh to our understanding so we think of him worship him seek to please him and lay a foundation for expecting and receiving some good from him And what inscription the Athenians had on their Altar Act. 17.23 the same may be found on a world of our devotions all being to an unknown God For as Christ said to the woman of Samaria Serviunt Deo qui tantum opinionabiliter non natura est deus for the most part we worship we know not what Joh. 4. for he is onely a God in our opinion and conceit and not in truth and his own nature who accepteth respecteth loveth or blesseth any for any work worth or goodness of theirs but the true reason and ground of all favour is Christ Eph. 1.6 Nam verus naturalis Deus sic loquitur Nulla religio sapientia justiâ—ia c. nisi illa unica qua pater glorificatur per filium c. Thus he that in his thoughts falleth from that true knowledge of Christ and that in him he is well pleased with him pacified towards him receiveth loveth him without and before any actual holiness and work or performance of his he necessarily falleth forthwith into Idolatry because he cannot now but imagine such a God and frame him in his own minde which is nowhere to be found A God out of Christ without a Mediatour not satisfied reconciled at peace with us propitious to us Omnis lomo qui relabitus a cognitione Christi necessario ruit in Idololatriam c. c. but requiring and respecting some duty or holiness in us to move him to grant us access audience and all blessings needful an absolute God clothed with glorious attributes terrible to sinners and not justifying the ungodly through Faith in Christ nor loving us when we were enemies and so by his own hand and work reconciling us to himself without any of ours Rom. 4.5 Rom. 5.8 9. such a God do many set up in their hearts and they frame their devotions works and ways suitable with this their image seeking in their own righteousness and holiness to draw nigh and that some goodness or qualification of theirs should commend and ingratiate them unto him A Fryers Coul a Monks hood holy order pilgrimages a strict and Religious life must speak for one sort Alii â—eâ—unant orant c. his se deum placere putant student quaerut Luth. others Fast Pray Vow Reform c. thinking studying seeking by those to pacifie God and procure his favour Now as we may plainly see that the Preface of the Decologue relateth to the Covenant of Grace of Promise of peace and life in the Messiah in which God did commend and make known himself what a God he would be unto them in what way he would deal with them and give them all their peace so God to keep this light in them to suppress or prevent all Idolatry or spiritual and false conceivings and imaginations of him contrary to that his promise whereunto mans nature is
exceedingly prone therefore saith I am thy God as I have made my self formerly known unto thee and thou shalt have no other as not worship stocks and stones so not form and conceive otherwise of me in thy heart and minde And verily as the heavenly light of this true knowledge of God which did appear in the word and work of atonement by Jesus Christ began to be eclipsed and darkened in the Church so idolatry and superstition crept in and prevailed till at last it became palpably gross by Images Pictures using of Saints for Advocates and the like And the bright and glorious arising and shining forth of the Sun of Righteousness who hath health under his wings Mal. 4.4 will prove the alone effectual means to disperse dispel demolish and abolish all that trash and superstitions vanities and to instruct and guide mens souls aright into the knowledge of the true God M. B. The practical use is to pray and labour for such a free and heavenly heart that the Law of God may not be a terrour to you Answ You have taken a course for that aforehand for how can the Law be a terrour while you teach that it cannot curse nor condemn but thus a mans heart may flatter him with a false peace in the way of legal conformity having not attained to the righteousness of Faith or of Christ Again that Spirit which maketh the heart so free and heavenly that the precepts of the Law are sweetness and delight cometh not by the Ministery of the Law but of the Gospel this is not the Spirit of bondage to fear but of Adoption Grace and love Therefore let us pray and labour that the Gospell may have a free passage and be glorified LECT VI. Rom. 2.14 15. For when the Gentiles which knew not the Law c. M. B. Pa. 58. OBservation There is law of nature writen in mens hearts How can the Antinomian think that the moral law in respect of the mandatory power of it ceaseth Ans Your Antinomian thinketh as you also know that the moral law is perpetual and inviolable in respect of the mandatory and damnatory power also within its own territories and dominion there is nothing taken from it thus you mistake him forget your self and abuse your reader and hearers M. B. Page 59. This is good to take notice of against a fundamental error of the Antinomians about the Law in general for they conceive it impossible but that the damning act of the Law must be where the commanding act of a Law is Answ If this errour be fundamental I muse you bring no stronger Artillery to batter and quite raze it 2. Your adversary speaketh of the power and you dispute of the Act there may be power where it is not alway acting 3. I say still The law hath power from the Author of it indifferently to command and to condemne If the Law of our Land should never condemne or punish actually for murder because no man-slayer is to be found yet it hath power to do it nvertheless when occasion shall serve M. B. There are only two things go to the essence of a law c. 1. Direction 2. Obligation Answ These are but your words without warrant or weight which can never carry it your part is to refell the contrary 2. If there be such a law which can onely direct and oblige to it the Apostles Argument may seem to be invalid Gal. 3.10 saying They that are of the works of the Law are cursed c. for a man may be of the works of the Law as it is of power to oblige to direct and oblige only say you and yet be exempt and free from the curse I much marvel that you or any can suppose a law obliging to it for obedience and yet not obliging or binding to answer for disobedience Whatever the Law saith it saith to them that are under the law that every mouth may be stopped and all the world become guilty before God Rom. 3.19 Herein say you lyeth the essence of sin that it breaketh the Law which supposeth the obligatory force of it Answ Sin is a swerving from the rule of direction 1 John 3.4 But can there be sin and not guilt or can you suppose a man to be formally a sinner and yet out of condemnation by the law by preventing that consequence as you call it Lastly a man is properly odious and hateful to God in that he is a sinner and not as he is guilty and subject to the curse which be the effects of justice occasioned only by sin M. B. God by reason of the dominion he had over man might have commanded obedience and yet never a promise of eternal life Answ To what purpose do you here tell us what God might have done where the question is of what God hath done what a law he hath made and put man under which as it commandeth obedience so it condemneth disobedience Rom. 2.8 9. Who God will render unto every one according to his deeds to them who by patient continuance in well-doing seek for glory and honor and immortality eternal life But to them who are contentious and do not obey the truth but obey unrighteousness indignation and wrath Is not here the express and full minde of God in his law and will you curtaile or conceal any part of it Besides how can it stand with divine justice to constitute a Law without power to punish transgressors when he giveth his law in charge he saith That he setteth before them life and death blessing and cursing Deut. 30.19 You may long tell any sober understanding man that he may safely put his hand into the fire it cannot burn him for there may be a fire without power to burn before you can perswade him unto it And yet God hath sufficient power to do this also M. B. As for the other consequent act of the law to curse and punish that is but an accidental act and not necessary to a law for it cometh in upon supposition of a transgression and therefore as we may say of a Magistrate He was a just and compleat Magistrate for his time though he put forth no punitive justice if there be no malefactors offending so is it about a law Answ The Apostle in Gal. 3.19 doth strongly and convincingly conclude against you viz. that the moral law came in with power not only to direct but to reveal wrath curse and condemne for saith he It was added because of transgression that is to accuse and convince of it and to condemne for it that so it might be subservient to the promise in preparing the heart for Christ the blessed Seed This is plaine to be Gods intent in giving and bringing in his law at the first by Moses except you can since then let us see how it is altered or where and when the law was onely given to direct and oblige the other authority and power being denied it or rather taken away
are resolved to venture against the pikes of old tryed and pure truth innocency and a good conscience Well henceforth be better advised like one bemisted you have mistaken your way misrepresented your adversaries and run your credit cause and conscience into a great hazard and you may expect worse in all these without wise and timely retreat The counsel is good if it can be seasonably taken and it cometh from a friend and well-wisher M. B. page 63. This law of nature can never be abrogated And herein we may demand of the Antinomian Whether the law of nature do binde a believer or no whether he be bound to obey the dictates of his natural conscience Answ If a man were not first bound he could not be said properly to be loosed or set free It is granted yet with much limitation and in some things only that every one is bound to obey the dictates of his natural conscience and it is as true to be granted by you also that in case he hearken not at some times or in some things or in case of defect and failing or imperfection this natural law will give out sentence of condemnation for the same as Rom. 2.15 from which it is the peculiar and continual office of faith to set free and secure the conscience So that you do very improperly demand whether the law of nature do binde a believer quatenus so whereas a man believeth that he may be set at liberty in Christ In whom he in his spiritual estate towards God in the things of his peace and life is free as Christ is free with whom by a true and real union he is become one spirit 1 Cor. 6.17 And so is passed from judgement of condemnation and from death to life Fidei nil proponi debet praeter meramgratiam aâ—que haec est ejus objectum Calv. John 5.24 And here faith doth not stand bound to give ear to the voice of either implanted or moral law for the procuring or preservation of peace and comfort but turning from both and not regarding them doth direct and confine ear eye the thoughts and meditations of the soul to that alone simple object Christ and to what he speaketh in the word of grace and salvation whose blood sprinkled and shed for remission of sins cryeth for better things then the blood of Abel This is the proper office obedience and exercise of faith So in God will I praise his word Psal 56. here will I settle my thoughts and fortifie them against the dictates and accusations of a natural conscience sense of sin reason law Satan or whatever assaileth If faith give not an acquiescence and rest to the foul in that free and full atonement by Christ and the goodness and favour of God in him it is in danger to be lost for ever And as you have given me this fair occasion so for the more simple and weak Christians sake who is little versed herein and principled otherwise let me further add That although nature do acknowledge a God and that he is to be worshipped and served Nil magis adversatur fidei quam lex ratio Luth. yet this opinion which is also seconded and much strengthened by the moral law is not without danger and is repugnant to the doctrine and knowledge of faith for nothing is more cross to faith then the law and natural reason the maine battel and dispute in a believer is between the dictates of his natural conscience confirmed by the moral law and the principles of his faith and as the law of faith doth enter and prevaile so it captivateth razeth and expelleth the natural and legal knowledge and thoughts of God and imprinteth a divers from them only suiting to the Gospel or covenant of Grace for now since the death of the Testator the covenant is so ratified and confirmed with God that he remembereth the sins of his people no more but abides fully In illa gratuita reconciliatione per obsignationem spiritus acquiescit It a gloria datur Deo non considerat fides quicquâ—d in nobis vel aliis creaturis ei adversari videatur Olev and for ever pleased with them in his Son and through faith herein the conscience also is made to yeeld to it to receive and imbrace it and so is led and brought into this confidence of the quietness and peace of God towards us and hereby effecteth our assured rest in God reconciled for ever which is the true Christian Sabbath Thus every high thing exalting it self against the knowledge of God according to the Gospel is to be cast down and every thought to be brought into captivity to the obedience of Christ 2 Cor. 10.4 5. And by this is glory given unto God while one thing is felt or suggested within and another is believed Let this be well marked of great and continual use in every Christian that the law implanted by nature is ever contradicting and reclaiming against the testimony of God in the word of his grace whence ariseth the difficulty and impossibility of believing save by the power and operation of God Col. 2.12 therefore in the weighty things of faith to hearken to the natural conscience or moral law will quite overthrow whole Christianity and turn aside the soul to destruction The seeds of morality and remanents of the covenant of works may be found in nature but there is no sparke nor intimation of any pure Gospel In innocency Adam was not principled to finde and receive his righteousness peace and life in another out of himself M. B. Think not that because he Christ dyed to free you from the curse of the law that therefore you are freed from the obedience Answ And do not you think nor teach that Christ came to take away the curse and condemning power from the law contrary to his own express words Mat. 5.17 18. where he saith that every jot of the Law is imperishable and in his opening and applying it afterwards he doth as command so reprove threaten and condemne 2. You will not deny but what Christ hath performed for me as my surety that I am so freed from that it may not be required of me to that end as before 3. Christ doth free us that we by his Spirit may serve freely and cheerfully and without all fear in holiness and righteousness before God all the dayes of our life Luk. 1.76 Therefore are we taken into a New covenant that giveth power and fitness so to serve wherein he promiseth the law in our hearts to put his Spirit into us to give a new heart and a new way c. which the covenant of works could not do Jer. 31. Ezek. 36.27 c. M. B. Vse of instruction against the Antinomians who must needs overthrow the directive and obligative force of the law of nature as well as of Moses Ans This is but the old slander the same false charge so often repeated It is by this
by him then you canonize him for Orthodox M. B. But they never used such expressions in the Antinomian sense as if hereby we were made not only perfectly righteous but also holy and without sin Answ When the Authors have the same expressions and use the same words yet if you may be the Glossary your sinister mind can make their sense to vary and differ 2. They who say we are persectly righteous do affirme us to be holy also and without sin in the same sense and manner but not inherently for if the law require holiness and righteousness how can we be justified in Christ from what the Law hath against us and yet not be as well holy as righteous in him and so without sin what can be spoken by the Spirit of God more plainly then this Christ hath loved us and washed us from our sins in his blood Rev. 15. See also Col. 1.22 And read Luther on Psal 130. vers 3. who there saith They that put not their trust herein alone that by the death of Christ their sins are taken away and Gods eyes closed that he cannot see their sins must needs perish for this onely do the Scriptures set forth that our life resteth wholly and alonely in the remission of sins and in that the Lord will not see our sins but in mercy cover them c. In the reading of which words the said Author of the Honey-comb was much convinced and sore terrified and troubled as he confessed But your carnal reason can put a lower and strange sense upon all such places and so present them in your own shape that nothing may offend any beyond a carnal sense no truth can be admitted what God speaketh plainly will be received no further then wit conceiveth and letteth us see how it may be true and then we will say we belive it but that is not to give credit unto God in what in his word he propoundeth but to assent unto reason as it comprehendeth LECT XV. Exod. 20.1 And God spake c. M. B. HAppily the Law will be more extolled in its digninity then ever by those opinions which would overthrow it Answ It is impossible for any to extoll the Law above the dignity due and proper to it but what you attempt for that purpose doth neither gaine glory to the Law nor commendation to your self 2. You tell us of opinions overthrowing it yet can let your reader see none more subverting and injurious then your own Indeed you bear the world in hand that the adversaries which you have made or feigned to your self do speak against the use of the Law and preaching of it cry down the Law utterly abolish it c. all which with more such-like interwoven stuff is fasly suggested by you to render them erroneous and odious but you can make no such things appear M. B. page 139. For we may either take the word Law for the whole dispensation of the commandments moral judicial and ceremonial or else more strictly for that part we call the moral law yet with the preface and promises added to it And in both these respects the law was given as a covenant of grace which is to be proved in due time or else most strictly for that which is meer mandative and preceptive without any promise at all Answ It is granted the word Law is capable of the two former significations but that in both those respects it was given as a covenant of grace especially in the later more strict sense for the moral law Is a new-coyned and bold assertion lately come out of the mint having as yet no image or superscription upon it save onely ipse dixit to make it currant If your spirits be grown so wanton and confident by reason of some supposed parts or abilities more eminent in your self that you will not keep tract of the Orthodox but slight and reject all humane authority as falling too short of that height you aime at in your aspiring thoughts yet reason requireth it of you to shew your reader some clear text of Scripture upon which you ground your distinction and positions If the moral law strictly and properly so called was given as a covenant of grace Why is it called a law of works requiring mans righteousness And then Paul argued nothing solidly when he said If it be of works it is no more of grace and if of grace it is no more of works else grace is no more grace To admit the one is to exclude and deny the other so inconsistent they be in this point Rom. 11.6 But you take time to prove it and you have your asking and we wait your leisure In the interim you present us with as uncouth and unwarrantable an assertion viz. that the word Law is taken for that which is meer mandative without any promise at all c. It will prove as difficult as bold an enterprize to undertake the proof and defence of this The Scriptures define the law in these words Do and live and so implyeth the contrary viz. He that doth not shall dye so that the mandative is not without the promise nor threatning When Paul saith They that are of the works of the law are cursed Gal. 3.10 doth he not argue convincingly that the works of the law which we do in obedience to its command cannot be secured and set free from the curse And that the law is ever invested with divine authority to promise and threaten to curse and bless to kill and give life I should be afraid so to limit the Lords Soveraignty and to devest him of so much power in his just and holy law as to make him some petite and under-ruler or commander allowing him in his law onely a jurisdiction to make and impose a law without a full and due reigning power having no more light to clear it then as yet you hold forth unto us And now with this wittily-devised key you can pick out and give us the right sense of all those assertions which the learned have concerning the difference between the Law and the Gospel and putting your sense into their words can make them speak as you please But though you can shew us no text to ascertaine the verity of any thing yet you give us a reason as weak and unsound as is your affirmation viz. M. B. For if you take as for the most part they do all the precepts and threatnings scattered up and down in the Scripture to be properly the law and then all the gracious promises where-ever they are to be the Gospel then it is no marvel if the law have many hard expressions cast upon it Answ This reason seemeth to occasion your forged distinction And 1. You would father this upon the learned but tell us of no Author book nor testimony It would have been to your credit and the justification of your weak and questioned cause to have produced one sentence or sillable sounding that way 2.
not kill and Whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgement But I say unto you That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shalt be in danger of the judgement and whosoever shall say to his brother Racha shall be in danger of the counsel but whosoever shall say Thou fool shall be in danger of hell-fire I Wonder at an Antinomian who is so apt to oppose the doing of things in love M. B. p. 173. and doing them by the law together for doth not the law command every duty to be in love Answ Did not Christ taxe and reprove the Pharisees for their alms prayers sacrifices c. which were things commanded in the law because they wanted pureness of love and did them in hypocrisie for praise and self-ends 2. It is the chief point of wisdom in the teacher to discover want of truth of affection and love to things done according to the outward precept of the law 3. Whoso doth a thing simply being moved thereunto by the authority of the law doth it not in love 4. Though the law require love in every duty yet it both findes us in enmity and yet it cannot breed nor work love in the heart though it be often pressed to be done where no such affection is found nor once spoken of thus most are suffered to bless themselves in that kinde of doing M. B. Yea we are to love God by the law because he hath given Christ for us for the law commandeth to love God for whatever benefit he bestoweth upon us Answ If God command love by the law because he hath given Christ then you must presuppose that Christ was given before promise to give him in future it had been more probable for the promise of the Messiah was before the giving of the Law 2. But neither you nor I if we understand what love in truth is can love God because the law requireth it though that be a reason alledged and used for it for it is his love shed abroad into the heart that causeth love in us We love him because he loved us first Natural enmity whatever we profess otherwise cannot be destroyed and abolished but by faith which purifieth the heart and worketh by love M. B. God doth work grace in us by this the law as well as by the Gospel God doth use the law instrumentally for to quicken up grace and increase it in us as Psal 1 19. sheweth Answ Paul rendereth that as the onely reason why righteousness cannot come by the law because it cannot vivifie quicken or give life Gal. 3.21 the quickening spirit is not adjoyned to it The proper office and end of the law is to convince us of sin and death that we may seek righteousness and life in Christ by faith the branch liveth and groweth in the vine and so fructifieth John 15. But this controversie you do professedly and with all your forces of Scripture and Arguments enter upon and largely handle in your 20 Lecture therefore let us pass on unto it for the whole 19 nothing concerneth us LECT XX. Mat. 5.21 22. Ye have heard it hath been said by them of old c. THE Antinomian doth directly derogate from the profitable effect and benefit of the law M. B. Pa. 187. Answ Your accusation and charge will prove too directly peremptory bold and unjust he that acknowledgeth all the effects and benefits of the Law that the Orthodox or God himself in his word do mention cannot derogate any jot from it M.B. This therefore is the assertion which an Antinomian Author maintaineth viz. that the law is not an instrument of true sanctification and that the promise of the Gospel is the seed or doctrine of the new birth and it may not be denied but that many speeches might fall from some men which might seem to comply with that opinion Answ Here is strange insolency and loftiness of spirit All mens eyes must be put out but yours or theirs who see as you see you pretend learning and reading but how is the judgement of the learned slighted and contemned by you you stand up as a zealous advocate pleading for the Law but what illegality and injustice is this with what scorn and lordliness do you insult over your Adversary and would bear and beat down him the truth and his innocency under the foot of pride and disdain Your single opinion must be preferred before all and received by all in your conceit it carrieth in it the light of the Sun here is the Popes spirit all erre but he all is Gospel that comes from him his word is a law onely his Chair is wanting But what mean the Presisident and Fellows of Sion-Colledge to do in the end who so approve and applaud this man and his Book Intend they hereby to bring in and establish a piece of new and strange divinity and to reject and overthrow what is old and true 1. It may not be denyed say you Answ But if it might then perhaps it would be denyed but there is that convincing power in the light of simple truth that will force even the most impudent somewhat to yeeld 2. Yet see what mincing he useth and how loth he is to grant the whole truth and that the world should know that his Adversary hath any of the learned Orthodox truly and really for him or that he himself opposeth any in this but a vilified and despised Antinomian Many speeches might fall saith he from some men as if they were half a sleep or not so considerate as he is when they let such speeches fall or at least intended no such thing or not in our sense as he often saith for it is in him to put what sense or gloss he pleaseth upon their words that so they may not be for us whenas the same truth yea totidem ipsissimis verbis is asserted by both 3. From some men And are they not men of least worth and account too in the Church I dare say you do think no better of them for it They are but some then perhaps you mean few and yet I think you can hardly name one learned and sound Author from whose pen the same assertion hath not fallen 4. Might seem to comply with that opinion Multa videntur quae non sunt What do they seemingly accord with us but in truth and reality are all for you or as you will have them who have learned to make quidlibet ex quolibet yet why do you not produce one for you because you scarce can do it Reader If thou hast the Assertion of grace and wouldst turn to page 166. and 170. thou maist find there Augustine Luther Calvin Bullinger Cornerus Perkins Cudworth Brentius Piscator Fox Tindal and Rollock unto which it is easie to add as many more Orthodox all punctual and full to the point affirming what I say and their words are direct full and exclusive denying this power and work to the
what Gospel what then doeth it But who will regard how promiscuously he preach seeing if he desire and intend either regeneration healing or conversion of the soul or yet as pag. 192. the increase of grace and holiness the Law as Gospel may indifferently be preached by him and blessed by God And though in respect of the use and end intended the law be subservient yet in their way propounded Gods and mans righteousness and of the effects produced by either viz. life and death they are and must be contrary M. B. And this must needs be the opinion of all sound Divines whatsoever may fall from them at other times as appeareth by their common answer to the Papists question If the Law and the commands thereof be impossible to what purpose then doth he command them Then we answer That those commands are not onely informing of a duty but they are practical and operative means appointed by God to work at least in some degree that which is commanded Answ You know they do not plainly and professedly say this is their opinion and therefore without alledging one sentence out of any directly to second this of yours you labour to derive and infer it as busily as you may such poor shifts are you put unto 2. Neither is it the opinion of all for those are as sound whose answer is That the law doth therefore command things now impossible that we may see our great loss by the fall with our present disability that so we may be humbled a viled and confounded in our selves 3. To incline and dispose the soul to look into the Gospel-way in which all cometh as to beggers by faith and prayer Therefore Augustin saith God commandeth things impossible not as you say that in commanding he may give power but that we thereby feeling our owne utter insufficiency may be occasioned to turn precepts into prayers saying Da quod jubes God bids us turn not thereby to enable us but that finding thereby both the necessity of it and also our inability we may cry Turn thou us and we shall be turned Thus we see whose hand worketh the will and deed 2. You also still mince the matter saying At least in some degree you love to play at small games rather then sit out you are uncertain not resolved as yet what to affirm and stick unto this being a fiction of your owne and no Scripture or Author can be produced to confirm or countenance it It was never questioned but what is wrought by the ministry of the word is to be attributed to the Spirit as the principal efficient and other passages of which he still giveth some verbal touch being already cleared I now proceed to his Arguments M. B. I bring these Arguments to prove the Law and preaching of it the means of Conversion 1. That which is attributed to the whole word of God as it is Gods word ought not to be denyed to any part of it Now this is made the propertie of the whole word of God to be the instrument of conversion 2 Tim. 3.16 Answ 1. Your proposition is unsound and will not be granted many things are often attributed to the word in general which canot be affirmed of every part of it Rom. 15.4 Whatsoever things are written were written for our learning that we through patience and comfort of the Scripture might have hope that is saith Piscator through patience arising from the comfort of the Scripture viz. that be written aforetime Now in the second premise page 188. you tell us that however the law may be blest to conversion yet it cannot be the ground of our justification adoption and consolation nor a man cannot have hope nor comfort in whatever he doth but it must be the promise onely of the Gospel See how your self will not have righteousness comfort and hope from every part of the word no from no part of the law but do restrain it to the Gospel onely and yet the greatest part of what was then written was law 2. Your Assumption is denyed also viz. That it is the property of the whole word to be the instrument of conversion And your place 2 Tim. 3.16 will not conclude it For first the Apostle speaketh not there of conversion but of conversation manners and life to the converted Secondly If all Scripture were to reprove correct then none is to comfort but one part is to reprove and another for consolation a third for doctrine c. law is to kill and Gospel to make alive what part is for one effect and purpose hath not formally any partial ability or fitness for another let the eye see the tongue speak and the feet walk as being purposely made and fitted for their proper offices The whole Scripture is as a promptuary or full Treasury out of which may be drawne and taken what is needful for faith and manners but what is for manners will be unaptly used to build up in the faith Also Matth. 13. the word compared to the seed is vers 19. called by Christ himself the word of the kingdom or note of distinction and by it is meant the Gospel as all know Lastly for that place Heb. 4.12 let Piscator satisfie you if the context will not serve you he saith it is Sermo Evangelii the word of the Gospel which is effectual to pierce the heart and convince the minde of the truth of the heavenly doctrine in it so that none can with a quiet conscience derogate from the credit or verity of it And he addeth that usitatissimum est c. It is a very usual thing with Paul by the word of God in general to mean the word of the Gospel M. B. 2. Argument is taken from those places where the law is expresly named to be instrumental in this great work not to name that place Rom. 7.14 where the law is called spiritual in that respect as well as in others because it is that which worketh spiritually in us as Paul was carnal because he wrought carnally Answ Indeed that place might well have been spared in this controversie for you finde nothing in it for your turne It is called spiritual because of the spiritual nature of it in opposition to Pauls which was carnal and because Paul was carnal therefore he wrought carnally but his working carnally did not make him carnal Also the law is called spiritual because of its spiritual discovering and convincing power or efficacy but not because of any spiritual change it wrought upon Paul as the whole context and every circumstance there maketh it plain the law let him see the vitiousness of his nature what repugnancy and contrariety was in him to that purity holiness and perfection held forth in the law and so occasionally by the commandment sin became exceeding sinful vers 13. M. B. The places are clear out of Psalm 119. and Psal 19.7 The Law of God is perfect converting the soul That which the Antinomian objecteth
is that the Hebrew word doth signifie largely any doctrine and so may comprehend the whole word of God Answ You say that others as well as they Antinomian take the law so largely so that you see your Adversarie is not single in his opinion as you are who can produce no Author but onely say It seemeth good to expound that phrase in such a manner And otherwise it seemeth it would cross your designe else I see nor you do shew no reason But Luther and some others upon that place Psal 19.7 do take the law for the moral law but I dare say you will not stand to their exposition of it Luther saith This is no absolute commendation of the law but it is to be understood legem talem factans esse per fidem non talia facit lex The law worketh not these it self but they are effected by the influence of the Sun of righteousness inwardly quickning reviving and comforting the soul through the faith of the Gospel The law giveth nor hath no such heat or vertue of it self but produceth contrary effects It may indeed saith he convert the eye mouth hand ears omnes vires sed magis avertit cor odio paenarum indignatione prohibitae concupiscentiae sed cor non est rectum spiritus non est fidelis In brief his judgement is that after the soul is justified and converted by the Gospel then it loveth the law which it hated before and now it doeth not avert or as being afraid she from God in his law but with confidence and delight draweth nigh unto him and observeth the things of the law because the Spirit of Christ in the Gospel maketh them sweeter to the soul then all the riches and pleasures of this life Thus it s the doctrine of reconciliation by Christ believed on that marvelously altereth the Christians heart causing it to convert and turn to God as being thereby able to abide his sight and presence and to love his saw Et Amans legem non potest eam satis landare adeo placet quae prius adeo displicuit You say nothing that hath any strength in it against the truth held out and maintained by us And by this you may see whence it was that David so commended the law strictly taken because his heart was so altered by the faith of the operation of God It is remarkable saith Luther that the way to love and keep the law is to believe and receive the Gospel from this belief issueth love and all true obedience and it is not bred and effected by the law commanding and requiring it By faith we establish the law Rom. 3. ult M. B. That opinion which would make Christ not take an instrumental way for conversion of men in his first Sermon wherein he was very large that must not be asserted but to hold that the preaching of the law is not a Medium to conversion must needs be to say Christ did not take the nearest way c. Answ You answer your self page 169. where your words are That our Saviours intent was only to explicate the law better then did the Scribes and Pharisees that so they might be sensible of sin and discover themselves to be fouler and more abominable then ever they judged themselves unto which let me add And that by requiring and so letting the hearers see a necessity of a more absolute righteousness then was held forth even in the doctrine of the Scribes and Pharisees he might so destroy all confidence in their own works prevent the establishing of mans righteousness and prepare and dispose them to hearken after his righteousness for he is the end of the law for righteousness to al that believe Rom. 10.4 And by this it may appear that he used the law preparatorily to justification and conversion as you in part are forced to grant it to be the opinion and doctrine of all Orthodox Divines and yet it is thwarted by you who love to have a way by your self M. B. If the law of God have that objectively in it that may work exceedingly upon the heart when set home by Gods Spirit then it may be used instrumentally as well as the Gospel but it hath c. Answ Here is nothing but the vain reason of man If God be otherwise pleased what is it how glorious fit and worthy soever it may seem for this in our eyes The Sun in the firmament is a glorious object to look upon when we have eyes but God useth it not therefore to give and restore the use of sight to those that be blind the seeing man findeth variety of delightful objects to look at among the creatures but they finde him not eyes therefore M.B. 5. If the law of God may be blessed after a man is converted to the increase of his grace and holiness why not then to the first beginning of it That it is for the increase of of Godliness appeareth by experience Answ Every Christians experience teacheth him that the more he inwardly seeth and feeleth that divine love that pardoneth reconcileth and preserveth the soul in that everlasting covenant of sure mercies and peace the more it loveth againe and in love hateth evil escheweth it doth good is every way cheerfully obedient I love the Lord saith David because he heard me when I called upon him in the time of trouble and delivered my soul from death my eyes from tears and my feet from falling What bred and caused love and gained the heart to God at the first that same is of continual force still to enlive and enlarge the affections towards him But because sins are forgiven it is said she loved much Luke 7. and if this Candle be put under a bushel if this Sun the light of Gods countenance do not shine forth upon the Solissequium the soul of a believer it will be dark dull and indisposed to whatever good you can propound to it therefore is it requisite that faith be nourished and ever operative and lively in apprehending and feeding upon that exceeding kindness of God in Christ that so it may be more quick and free in all holy expressions Faith works by love if faith dye or wax cold by which the soul liveth the law can but little work upon or affect the heart Besides as the Christians beginning so his building up and increasing is in another way and by other means then are meerly legal he lives and grows in the Vine Christ and thereby fructifieth M. B. It is hard to think that a Minister having opened any moral duty of the law may not pray to God to cloath that word with power to change the heart of the hearers Answ Why should man thinke it hard or be offended at any thing where he findeth it Gods will that it be so and no otherwise 2. If God reveal not his minde and willingness to put forth any renewing power in the law how can you then pray in faith to be
it M. B. A third and last instance out of Scripture in answering of which all is answered from Gal. 3.2 Received ye the Spirit by the works of the Law or by the hearing of Faith that of the Gospel or doctrine of Faith In the opening of this Text we must take heed of three errors Answ A Caveat against all error is necessary but it is well that you accuse your Antinomian of none of those three And it had been wisdom in you to have taken heed of affectation of singularity for in rejecting all other of the Orthodox you substitute a most doubtful opinion of your owne as may appear by and by M. B. First I may demand whether any under the old Testament were made partakers of Gods Spirit or no. If they were how came they by it there can be no other way found but that God did give his Spirit in all those publick Ordinances unto the believing Israelites so that although they did in some measure obey the Law yet they did it not by the power of the Law but by the power of Grace Answ You might beware of co-incidency with the first error you named of having Faith before the Spirit for ever we come not to Faith by our reason and will yet you grant a giving of the Spirit to believers as if they first believed then received the Spirit but the gifts and operations of the Spirit are divers It s by the Spirit that the soul cometh to union with Christ and after the woman touched the hem of his garment she received a healing vertue but let this pass 2. By your next expression you might seem to be an Antinomian for They obeyed the Law say you but not by the power of the Law but by the power of Grace what difference now but I like not to force the joyning of hands where the parties hearts be not first linked yet the Reader may take it as if you contradicted your self for why are your words so exclusive but if it be not by the power of the Law originally as by the first and principal efficient yet you mean still it is a subordinate and secondary cause or mean of conveyance Egregie sane M.B. Again in the next place which hath alwayes much prevailed with me did not the people of God receive the grace offered in the Sacraments in the Circumcision Paschal Lamb They were partakers of Christ as well as we and yet the Apostle doth as much exclude Circumcision and these Jewish Ordinances from grace as any thing else wherefore that there may be no contradiction in Scripture some other way is to be thought upon about the exposition of these words Answ When a man willingly of himself is going down a steep place every thing will further him If you had not first conceived this silly and weak opinion of your self out of a humour of contradiction and desire to be accounted the vindicator of the Law you needed not to be so puzled and put to such shifts nor to seek out such sandy grounds and tottering Pillars to support what you see cannot be upholden I may so far credit you that this hath prevailed with you as you tell us but I cannot think it alway did so for you have not alway thought of this nor alway been of this private opinion that the Law is the doctrine of regeneration 2. Grant that this prevailed to keep and continue you in that minde yet would I learn if I might be so bold what brought you into it at first sure it came by some immediate inspiration for I see neither clear Scripture nor Author for it 3. As it hath so prevailed with you so I am sensible of no force at all in it whether to incline or carry the judgement unto it at first or to keep the minde the same still Consider better of it It is granted the people of God did receive the grace offered in their Sacraments c. and were partakers of Christ as well that is as truly and as really as we now what is this to your purpose I ingenuously profess I see not wherein it maketh one jot for you or to confirm your tenet what would you infer hence you say the Apostle did as much exclude these ordinances from grace as any things else and as well as much as the Law that must be your meaning Answ Your self have seemed still to exclude the Law from Grace and to make a direct opposition between them 2. As for Circumcision and these Ordinances being in their prime institution types yea signes exhibitive of Christ and if not essential parts yet appendances of their Covenant of Grace which cannot be said of the Law it being a doctrine of another nature and use therefore neither the Apostles nor Prophets in that case and sense did exclude them from Grace but onely as the hypocrites Ceremonia Legis in sua natura consideralae non autem quatenus suo tempore Sacramenta erant gratiae Pisc Gal. 3. and unbelievers did use them as resting in the things done or using them being antiquated and our of date or joyning them with Christ and Faith as necessary observances to salvation c. Now as this assertion will be too bold as unjustifiable That the Apostle doth as much exclude the Jewish Sacraments in their prime pure and right use from Grace as he doth the Law so that Argument is too childish viz. If the believing Jewes were partakers of Christ and did receive grace by these Ordinances so did they receive grace by the Moral Law also If you look again there is neither contradiction in Scripture nor occasion given to seek out such an uncouth and unwarrantable exposition of the words M. B. Some there are that understand by the Spirit c. Answ Here you first present your Reader with Beza's interpretation but that is misliked as not to your purpose Again say you thus it may be explained As by faith is meant the doctrine of faith so by the works of the Law is to be understood the doctrine of the works of the law thus far I approve which the false Apostles taught viz. That Chrict was not enough to justification unless the works of the law were put in as a cause also Answ If you look into Act. 15. and compare vers 1. and 5. it seemeth that they taught Christ for justification for it is said vers 5. they believed and what should they believe in Christ for but for righteousness and yet they required Circumcision and the keeping of the Law of Moses as necessary to salvation vers 1 5. when we are justified we must work to get heaven So many now hold and teach that good works and observing of the Law are not needfull to justification but they are to salvation of which sort you will prove one if I mistake not Contrary to Act. 15.10.11 Now why tempt ye God to lay a yoak on the Disciples necks c. that is as though he
the Law Rom. 3.20 Rom. 7.7 Also you are much deceived when you say that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 See 1 Cor. 15.45 The first Adam was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a living soul nor as if he could quicken himself or others for that is peculiar to God himself no man as yet quickned his own soul And the opposition in that place sheweth the great difference between those two words for it followeth The last Adam was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a quickning spirit in that he both quickned himself being dead and quickneth all his members Lastly see that place Gal. 3.2 If there had been a Law which could have given life 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 righteousness should have been by the Law In which words Paul intimates that there was never Law given that could vivifie or which had any quickening vertue to impart or communicate unto any I will not trouble you with commentaries directly contradicting and overthrowing your exposition of that place because I perceive you so abound in your own sence that their judgement is not esteemed by you and you have greater store of them to satisfie you when you please then I have And lest you should be mistaken you adde Not that we could have life by vertue of any obedience but when we by grace are inabled to obey them c. Now I thought that you rather should have thus said as more pertinent to the question in hand But that they do instrumentally vivifie convert and give us life to obey them But in this saying of yours you grant as much as we contend for for if grace that cometh by the Gospel do inable us to obey the Law then it is not the Law that instrumentally doth convert and give life and strength to walk in it And your last clause is dangerously ambiguous seeming to import that Christ is not our salvation of himself without our works or obedience to the Law you will speak out more plainly and fully in some other place And you give us a poor reason why you inclined to this your opinion viz. because Socinians deny grace and justification under the Law or old Testament as if there were no middle way to take which could like you but either you must run on the rocks on one side or other Incidit in Scyllam c. Mr. B. And thus I come to another question which is the proper and immediate ground of strife between the Antinomians and us and from whence they have their name And that is the abrogation of the morall Law Answ Toto Coelo erras This is not the controversie except you mean that you do assert the Abrogation of it for it may sooner and more easily be concluded from your tenets then any of ours who hold the Law to be inviolable but this may appear afterward 2. If their name be from hence then if you prove them not guilty of the Abrogation of the Law you and others have falsly accused and standered them for Antinomians and now you for ever quit them from that aspersion I will be bold before the encounter if he that shall prove guilty of the abrogation of it in whole or in part shall be the Antinomian then mutato nomine de te narratur fabula look to your self Mr. B. Paul maketh an objection and he doth it for this end to take away the calumny and reproach cast upon him by his Adversaries as one that would destroy the Law Do we make void the Law Answ If you and your partners in your ministery did go with a right foot in the foot in the Gospel or tread in his steps the same would be charged upon you and you might be glad to pretend or wipe off such aspersions Hoc nomine pessime audiebat inter Judaeos non mode Paulus sed Dominus queque ipse acsi tota sua praedicatione legis abrogationem moliretur Nunquam tanta cautio c. Christ himself saith Calvin who is the wisdom of God could not so preach the doctrine of free-Grace but some took occasion from his words as you from ours to say or think he destroyed the Law hence was that prohibition Do not think I came to destroy the Law Matth. 5.17 Do you think your self more wise or wary in your Preaching then Christ or Paul was if not suspect your self in that you bear not the like reproach When innocency is thus traduced Presertim ver◠facile obtinet falsa hac imaginatio inter vos qui prepostera legis intelligentia c. Calv. and condemned quis stabit The Disciple is not above his Master if Christ and Paul were counted Antinomians Abrogaters of the Law who will not take up the same Cross And it is remarkeable by whom they were so opposed and aspersed even by the preposterous Zelots of Moses Law a generation which ever have and will hinder the free passage of the Gospel and disturb the peace of the Church like Cain Ishmael c. I thought here to have ended Sic ergo nes meminerimus Evangelium dispensare ut nostro decendi modo lex stabiliatur sed nulla alia firmitaetu quam fide Christi suffulta Id. but that in the closure I observe that you approve of Austins intepretation viz. The Law is established because by the Gospel we obtain grace in some measure to fulfill the law we obtain it not then by the Law and do obtain by faith in Christ still not by the Law then obedience in some degree to it Your eyes are strangely holden if you see not how this interpretation maketh fully for us and wholly against your self You adde Which obedience though it be not the Covenant of grace yet is the way to salvation Now there is nothing out of the covenant of grace can be proved to be in a strict and prosense the way to salvation Ubi ad Christum ventum est primum i◠eo invenitur exacta legi◠justitia quae por imputationem etiam nostra sit deinde sanctificatio qua sermantur cordae nostra ad legis observantiam c. Calv. To believe in Christ is the onely way to it Act. 16.31 Mark 16. Christ dwelleth in the heart by faith and he that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life Joh. 3.36 By attributing too much to the Law and our works you obscure the glory of Christ and of free-grace mingle Law and Gospel entangle and deject the hearts of the faithfull carry them from Christ and that union in spirit with him hinder the right exercise of faith and prayer c. for you teach that by the Law we receive grace conversion sanctification so that the Law enliveth filleth buildeth satisfieth It doth not make us poor feeble humble empty nothing in our selves that so we may seek out for all receive and live by faith in Christ our head grow up in him and so be built up in this way of
faith to the everlasting Kingdom You thus swerve from the truth and the old and good way LECT XXII ROM 3.31 Do we then make void the Law Here you tell us It is hard to set up Christ and grace and not thereby to be thought to destroy the Law But it is easie with who was never suspected 2. You say Your Antinomians still are mistaken in this point and plunged into a dangerous errour You should make your words good and discover the errour if not help them out we expect this from you 3. But now like blind Sampson unto whose fact you allude you have raised a doctrine which will lead you to lay your hands on the chiefe pillars of the Antinomian edifice Mr. B. The question then at this time to be discussed is whether the Law be abrogated or no by Christ to the believers under the Gospel Answ Who would question it for Christ came not to destroy the Law but taught that every Apex or lota of it is imperishable Matth. 5.17 18. Indeed your doctrine is the Law is deprived of all power to justifie accuse or accurse but who can receive it If these be no tittle or part of the Lawd understand nothing And yet you tell us often of promises of great rewards for your legall obedience and good works cherefore there is a power to justifie command and bless established by you or else which I rather think your tenets be inconsistent and mutually overthrow each other Mr. B. If we would speak exactly and properly we cannot say in any good sense that the Morall Law is abrogated at all Answ If you would keep there denying according to the truth of the Scripture any mitigation at all either totall or partiall we might soon agree shake hands and lay down our weapons Mr. B. We may say it is mitigated Answ It is then because your Tongues are your own or that you will speak before God say so and so without your Warrant Such teaching of mitigating and Evangelizing the Law of Gods accepting the will for deed c. hath occasioned such dangerous confusion of Law and Gospel these sad controverfies in the Church much instabilitie and many mistakes in the peoples minds c. Mr. B. But you must still distinguish when we speak of the Law some parts of it from the whole Some parts of it may be abolished and yet not the whole nature of it for there are in the Law these parts 1. Commands 2. Promises of life to him that doth them 3. The threatnings of eternal death to him that faileth Now the Morall Law although it be abrogated in respect of the two later to a believer yet in respect of the former it doth still abide yea and will continue in Heaven it self as we have already proved that one part of the Law may abide when the other doth not Answ Like Foundation like Building This makes all your opposition dispute and discourse so weak and soon annihilated in that your ground is so faulty and failing 1. Why are you so inconsiderate thus to distinguish where God doth not and so audacious as to mutilate his good Law which he delivered and would have still to be preserved entire and perfect 2. All this tendeth to nothing but to make the Kingdom and way of the Law so easie and tolerable that the soul may here find a requiem where to settle her abode and never enjoy nor come to Christ and dwell under his shadow and Kingdom where Grace through his righteousness reigneth to eternall life Rom. 5.21 3. What is the reason your discourse is so loose and improper did you not even now tell us that to speak properly and exactly we cannot say in any good sense the Morall Law is abrogated and have you so soon forgotten what you said or are you regardless of any good sense or propriety of words You make three parts I would know what parts they may be called Homogeneal all of them truely law as a drop of the Ocean is as verily water as the whole Sea or Heterogeneal as Timber and Stones be parts of a House but not of the same kinde and nature in themselves and the Soul and Body be two essential parts constituting the man yet the one as flesh the other as spirit and not of one of these alone but the compositum of both is the man So here I demand when you tell us we must distinguish some parts of the Law from the whole Whether these parts be essentiall and requisite to the making or constituting of the whole Law If these three be all parts then to take away two will mutilate if not destroy the whole Law the whole consisting but of three cannot be entire and perfect having lost two And the rather I ask this because pag. 139. you say but prove not for it is not your manner your Disciples and so all other must be jurati in verba Magistri that the Law most strictly taken is meer Mandative without any promises at all Now if the meer Mandative be a Law why do you call the other two there excluded as not needfull parts of it and not rather with Dr. Tailer appendices to it 4. To distinguish between part and part may be granted and usefull but as to distinguish between soul and body between Christ and his Church or between the signe and grace in the Sacrament but to separate and sunder one part from the the other you know here its intoleable and destructive and you so distinguish that you plainly separate and cut off two parts from the third as abolished And yet the whole nature of the Law remaineth if we can believe you not abrogated to the believer you have often put your Adversarie to reconcile his tenets when there was no such cause as you see here is to agree yours The Law in regard of the threats and promises say you is abrogated a very bold assertion which never can be made good When you promise eternall life unto every good work a believer doth as pag. 40. is it not a legall and conditionall promise so as no good work no eternall life and how then can you here say that the promises of the Law be abrogated to a believer And when a believer with Noah David Lot c. doth fall into open and scandalous offences do you not threaten and terrifie him that he may be moved and stirred up if he be secure to seek for healing by faith in the blood of Christ And doth not this also convincingly argue that the reproofs and threats of the Law are of force and not abrogated Lastly if the preceptive part continue in Heaven you cannot say that justice there shall be without power for the two other also what though it doth not actually condemn any Is God without power to make another World because he maketh it not And whereas you say That you have already proved two parts to be abrogated and one still abiding you either forget
not unto themselves but unto us they did Minister the things that are now reported unto you 1 Pet. 1.12 Mr. B. There are two notorious falshoods 1. That God indeed saw sin in believers in the old Testament but not in these of the new Answ To see sin is as an Act of Gods justice in the legall Ministration under which they were in the old Testament but now as is cleared we are not under that Ministration as sometime you yeeld so that it may follow that God might see sin in those and not in these You conceive and think of God without reference to his word and would have sin the object of his eternall and incomprehensible sight in a carnall sense and imagination Can you believe that God remembreth the sinnes of his people no more as his Covenant is Heb. 8.12 And why not then be perswaded of this Mr. B. Was not that place God seeth not iniquity in Jacob spoken of the Church in the old Testament and besides If the Godly were in Christ then doth it necessarily follow by his principles That God must see no sin in them Answ The Authour took that place as I remember to be a Prophesie of a future state 2. Though they were in Christ yet not being adulti but in their time of minority under that legall government God might see and impute sin temporally unto them so there appeareth no absurdity or contradiction but that you love to have your own words Mr. B. The second difference he maketh is that God seeing did therefore punish and afflict for it but he doth not so now So Moses was stricken with death c. Now who seeth not how weak and absurd these Arguments are for doth not the Apostle 1 Cor. 11. speaking of those under the new Testament say That some were sick some did sleep were not Ananias and Sapphira struck dead immediately Answ Your words indeed are that his Arguments are weak and absurd but you make no such thing to appear As for that of 1 Cor. 11. his Answer to it still may suffice for you shew not any invalidity of it nor regard his distinctions there given Besides It will not be granted that those Corinthians nor yet Ananias and Sapphira were believers And so your reason falleth short of the point in question Mr. B. The Arguments of the Antinomians for the greater part do not onely overthrow the use of it to believers but to unbelievers also Answ Their Arguments if rightly conceived of and used do not overthrow the use of the Law to either but then you must keep it within its own proper limits and use it lawfully I grant if you understand those words The Law is a Schoolmaster to Christ historically onely for some make a mysticall and spirituall sence of them also then the meaning is that the same believing Jew who before was under the Law yet since Christ is freed from that servitude and so his state is changed that Pedagogy is no longer yea and believer or unbeliever in the daies of the Gospel we are not to meddle with that administration by Moses but onely to give care to the Gospel which is preached to all for the obedience of faith Rom. 1.2 5. but then it will necessarily follow that he that believeth is actually freed from the yoke of the Law if from the whole occonomy then from every part And he liveth by his faith onely under meer free grace Rom. 6.14 Mr. B. We will grant that to a believer the Law is as it were abrogated in these particulars 1. In respect of justification 2. Condemnation 3. Rigid obedience 4. It s no terrour nor are the godly slavishly compelled to obey 5. It doth not work nor increase sin as in the wicked 6. It is abrogated in many accessaries and circumstances Answ You say you had rather use the word Mitigation then Abrogation as being proper c. And I mislike both as they are used in reference to the Law for both Scripture and experience shew that neither word is incident nor can possibly befall the Law of God for it is inviolable If the Fire burn you not not Sea drown you it s not because they have lost that naturall power to do it but in that you happily are kept out of either such as abide under the Law find no true abrogation or mitigation And if the Law justifie not it 's not because the power of it to do it is lost or lessened for then it could not promise life to the observers saying Do. and live but in that it doth not justifie and give life actually to any that weakness is not in the Law but in man through the flesh Rom. 8.3 for the Law neither can nor ever yet had power to justifie a sinner nor one that failed the least in the observance of it And the like may be said in respect of condemnation The Law curseth and threatneth upon Sinai but cometh not on Mount Sion In Christ we are freed from the Law and so from its Condemnation so the change is in the state of a Christian but no alteration in the Law at all Your own expression cleareth it While the Law by reason of sinne doth pursue me I runne to Christ for refuge and seek to be found in him this I implyeth that the Law hath not lost any of its threatning or cursing power and that my security is not that the Law wanteth power to condemn but that I am in Christ and under his protection Phil. 3.9 As for your third respect of mitigating the rigid obedience as you call it yet I see you are forced to yeeld what D. Tailer and others did not that it cannot be maintained If we fail in the least tittle we are presently gone by the Law And as Christ hath not obtained at Gods hand that the Law should not oblige and tye us to a perfect obedience so you might as truly say he hath not procured that the Law should not justifie us being sinners for this it could not do before But I am glad to have such words from you that all our obedience is accepted not because of any mitigation in Gods justice or for dignity in the duty but onely in and through Christ 1 Pet. 2.5 the best piece of Divinity I find in your Book but then there is no mitigation of rigid obedience in the Law To the fourth To speak properly the Law is therefore no terrour because a believer is not under it for it is a terrour to all that be under it the Christian being under grace is free from terrour And if he be sometime or something afraid that is not because there is not fulness of security in his condition but through the imperfection of faith as children we fear where and when we have no true cause neither doth it argue any less terrour in the Law And you have some strange add unsound expressions in this Section for grant a regenerate and ungenerate part
yet the man is but one and his state but one not two and put the Law with its terrour and compelling power to the flesh what availeth this Can this draw the flesh to the waies of piety as your words are you imagine either that the flesh being and remaining flesh can move in the waies of piety or that the terrour of the Law can change the corrupt heart but can clear or justifie neither It is simple and free believing that leadeth and carrieth the soul into the right way and all the forcing and terrifying of the Law can provoke onely unto an externall and hypocriticall obedience such as is in the Children of the Bondwoman If the spirit in the godly be not alway so willing the Law cannot give aide and quickening to it but rather dampeth and deadeth the spirit of faith and love and doth vivifie the corruption in nature for so saith Paul when the Commandment came sin revived and I died Rom. 7.9 and againe the strength of sin is the Law 1 Cor. 15.56 It 's onely faith in the Gospel of Christ that exciteth to all goodness cheerfully and joyfully so Heb. 11. Noah Abraham Moses are said to do all by faith Sine qua multa faciendo nihil facimus impleudo Legem non implemus What caused life at first must preserve and quicken it being dead or dull 5. And your fifth Assertion is false for the Law doth as is said and proved increase sin even in the faithfull this being the bitter effect of it through the vitiousness of our nature Rom. 7.5 The motions of sin which were by the Law do work in our members to bring forth fruit to death and all along the chapter Paul saith It wrought no otherwise in him in his regenerate estate but that all the power to resist weaken and overcome sin and the flesh was from Christ the head and his spirit Therefore thankes be to God through our Lord Jesus Christ This take notice of that if infidelity be accidentally nourished and faith hindered and opposed by the Law as is most true then sin cannot decrease but doth increase by it Besides is not flesh and corruption in the regenerate of the same kinde with that in the unregenerate If the Law then be the occasion of the reviving of sin in the one why not in the other the nature of the flesh nor the operative vertue of the Law is not altered by grace though they both be overmastered and subdued In the sixth you slander your Antinomian again for disparaging the Law in that it was written in stones What good can it do say you Answ It doth good many waies else God would not have writ it there but that cannot make man good God therefore hath promised to write his Law in the Tables of the heart by his spirit whereby the Gospel also is made effectuall as he pleaseth but this inward writing of the Law is a promise and branch of the new Covenant Jer. 31.33 Mr. B. But the Law continueth to them as a rule which may appear first from the different phrases used concerning the ceremonial law nowhere applied to the moral as which Chemuitius doth reckon up 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. which are not used of the Morall but when he speaketh of it he saith We are dead unto it We are redeemed from the curse of it which Phrases do imply the change to be wade in us and not in the Law Answ Your supposition is still false for we hold no abrogation mitigation or mutation in the Law as is already cleared 2. This maketh wholly for us for if there be no change in the Law then it continueth in all other offices and regards as well as to be a rule and so hath power to promise and to condemn also Hunc suo jugulo gladio 3. You reason nihil ad Rhombum viz. If the Antinomian could bring such places that would prove it were as unlawfull to love the Lord because the morall Law commands it as we could prove it unlawfull to circumcise c. Answ The rule of comparison requireth that it should be unlawfull to circumcise because the ceremoniall Law commands it And if that Law were of force still and not repealed it were as lawfull to circumcise so that the unlawfulness to do it is not from the nature of the thing but in that the ceremoniall requiring circumcision is abrogated but so is not the moral for then to love were not required But though the morall Law command love yet your heart wanting it it giveth it no power to do it Thus you have gained here nothing to your purpose but lost both labour and credit Mr. B. 2. From the sanctification and holiness that it requireth of the believer which is nothing but conformity to the Law Answ Though the Law require yet it proveth not it to be a rule regulating disposing and framing the soul to holiness for the Law doth not sanctifie but Christ is of God made to be sanctification whereby cometh true conformity to the Law The Law requireth to be just but doth not justifie so it willeth us to be Saints but sanctifieth not There is a mutuall relation between Christ and faith as a quality or vertue faith purifieth not but as it fetcheth and deriveth vertue from Christ Purity is not in us naturally the Law requiring it doth convince us both of the want of it and of the necessity to have it but it supplieth us not with it for then Christ need not be our root of holiness nor we by faith to have it from him but driveth us to Christ in whom all fulness dwelleth You have your Answer to the rest of the Section in what precedeth Mr. B. 3. In that Disobedience to it is still a sin to a believer Answ As Disobedience is a sin against the Law so it is condemned by the Law as was Davids adultery Peters deniall c. else what need they of faith to be justified from them so still by this the Law hath power to condemn as well as to rule As for the evasion you mention I know it not you have not as yet brought us into any such strait or danger as that we need seek evasion The residue of this Lecture maketh nothing for your purpose nor at all against us LECT XXIII Rom. 3.31 Do we then make void the Law yea we establish it HEre you do not invalidate the Authors assertion nor Arguments If the Law and Prophets lasted but till John And as John was greater then any before him so the least in the kingdom of Heaven is greater then he You will then find it hard to put John either under the old or new Testament or to evince your Adversary Inter Legem Evangelium interpositus fuit Johannes qui medium obtinuit munus utrique affine Calv. It 's true the Law or Moses and the Prophets write of Christ and agreed in that and did not onely typifie him
in the ceremonies then used as you imply Mr. B. In what sense the Apostle argueth against the Law Answ Truly he argueth not against it in any true sense at all but for it to give and maintain all its rights Mr. B. The proper state of the question in those daies appeareth Act. 15. where you have a relation made of some believing Jews of the sect of the Pharisees who pressed the necessity of circumcision c. Answ See Act. 15.5 There arose up certain of the Sect of the Pharisees which believed saying That it was needfull to circumcise them and to command them to keep the Law of Moses Note that expression which believed So that the question was then Whether that circumcision and the keeping of the Law were needfull to be conjoyned with the faith of Christ in the point of salvation and ver 11. makes it more plain We believe through the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ to be saved even as did they also I confess your first words might import as much but you are not constant but shrinke much from this And tell us what opinion the Jews were generally of who thought that the observation of the morall Law without Christ was enough for their peace and comfort In your prosecution of it you sejoyne what in the proposition was rightly conjoyned Those Jews who thought as you say That the external performing of the ceremonies and a life outwardly conformable to the morall Law would secure them they did oppose Christ and perfecute his Gospel as 1 Thes 2.14 15. But the other mentioned Act. 15. did receive and preach the Gospel though not according to the simplicity that is in Christ 2 Cor. 11.3 but added and mingled other things to that of faith and so overthrew the whole Gospel and salvation also Hence it was the Apostle peremptorily said that If they were circumcised Christ profited them nothing implying that they would have Christ and circumcision too Your words are That the Apostle speaketh seemingly derogatorily to the Law because they took it without Christ But he indeed derogated not from it but acknowledged it to be good if used lawfully but they did otherwise not in taking it without Christ as you affirm but in conjoyning it with him as if he alone were not sufficient to salvation as well as to righteousness without the works of the Law Take you heed of this way and kinde of teaching Mr. B. Now where the Law seemeth to be abrogated it is taken either 1 Synecdochically put for that part which actually condemneth as Gal. 5. Against such is no Law for he speaketh as if there were nothing in the Law but condemnation Whereas we may say the Law is by way of direction and prescription for a thing as well as against it by accusation Answ If it be said the Law of our Land hath nothing against you or to accuse you of in point of homicide Is this any seeming abolition of the Law while your innocency is cleared and justified the Law suffereth no diminution by it how tryfling and childish is this your discourse 2. If the Law be for a thing in direction and against it by accusation then by Pauls doctrine still it hath lost nothing of its power Thus the constant mistake is not ours but yours who most abolish the Law indeed Mr. B. First He is without the Law that is without the understanding of it thus the Gentiles Secondly Without the sense and experience of the terrifying power of it as Paul Rom. 7. Now the godly though they be denied to be under the Law yet are not said to be without it Answ It is true the faithfull have both understanding and experience of the Law but now faith Luther It is their cheif point of wisdom to be ignorant of the Law Is not this a Paradox or Parable You say Paul Rom. 4.14 cannot mean the Law of Moses for that was long after a poor reason Doth he not in Gal. 3. deny the blessing and inheritance of Abraham to be by the Law but by promise and yet ver 11. he saith The Law was 430 yeers after When the blessing was promised to come in that way to Abraham there was no question but now since the circumcision and the Law were after added to the promise and have been of so long continuance is that question thereby occasioned In the fifth Interpretation of what it is to be under the Law your words are nothing against us but rather confirme that exposition of Rom. 6.14 which is in the Assertion of grace against D. T. But observe withall how here you oppose Law and grace in sanctifying and healing which formerly you so much contradicted You say The Law is never so much alive as in the godly who most obey it But I say It is the spirit of Christ that quickeneth them by the Gospel to love and obey the Law and their obedience floweth from this life of faith as an expression of it He that liveth by faith as Gal. 2.19 20. keepeth the Law joyfully and freely LECT XXIIII Deut. 4.13 And he declared to you his Covenant c. Mr. B. I Have already handled the Law as a rule and now come to consider it as a Covenant that so the whole Law may be fully understood Answ Your undertaken be great and your promises sat and fair but never knew I worse success nor less performance I muse that these points so weighty and so much controverted should be so sleightly handled and your Affirmative part so weakly confirmed by a man of your learning Suppose all be clear and unquestionable to your self which I cannot believe now yet others need more light then as yet you hold forth And your Adversaries see nothing to convince and satisfie them You tell us He that is so blinde that he cannot see by the light of one Sun would not see any more if there were a thousand Suns Alas do you think that he that readeth then shall find these your elaborate and judicious Lectures so clear and beyond exception that he is like unto him that hath the nooneday to walke in and is strangely blinded if any thing be rejected as erronious or questioned as obscure To give you my ingratefull opinion I neither see light of one Sun nor yet of one beam of it I fear you are too self-conceited and self-confident I say no more but Aliorum esto judicium We are now being made publique to be censured by others Now you come to consider the Law as a Covenant c. Answ Then it is not simply a rule but it may be you will help this somwhat by telling us of a more large acception of the Law yet that is not to speak precisely to the point in controversie also though your considerations be divers yet the Law is constantly the same Your doctrine that the Law was delivered in Mount Sinai in a Covenant-way or it was a Covenant God made with his people I list not
dispense them as he pleased more sparingly then then now LECT XXVI Rom. 3.27 Where is beasting theu c. WHatever your reason or ends may be for it yet I see not any good or warrantable ground thus to take and handle the Law and Gospel in a large sense as you say and when you have done I would know what of the Gospel you conceive to be legall and how much Law you take to be Evangelicall Also you prefixe a Text as your foundation but the discourse you erect doth not touch it is not at all supported by it but stands like a Castle built in the Air. Neither do I find the Lutherans posing the Calvinists about the Law in this for both affirm the Law to be a Covenant of works and superadded to the promise holding forth all favour and peace upon such hard conditions to the Jews that they might experimentally be convinced of their folly in seeking it by their own righteousness You must go over it again else what is done will not serve to prove Moses Law a Covenant of grace Indeed we grant the godly Jews did enjoy what Christ premised but it was by such Ordinances as were of grace and not of works as is the Law they eyed or looked at Christ in the promises and not in precepts And as you began so you proceed laying down differences not between the Law and Gospell but between Gospel and Gospel I mean the administration of grace before and now of which others have writ more particularly plainly and profitably Then you tell us They Jews had a twofold consideration 1. as being servile another as being Sons but under age Now that is it that we say As Sons they were free for they were so by Christ promised but their condition was servile and their immunities and priviledges were in a great part vailed and kept from them But note that the Mosaicall pedagogy is antiquated what need was it to handle law or Gospel otherwise then in their strict and proper sense To run over every thing is long and tedious What is said by you of these differences may be granted with these two exceptions first that the law strictly taken is not as you say onely for those who have a perfect and holy nature Paul doth directly cross and contradict it saying The Law is not made for the righteous but for the Lawless and disobedient 1 Tim. 1.9 And Adam was not charged with this law in his integrity but had a Law touching a thing in its own nature indifferent for the keeping of this law was then naturall to him as is flying to a Bird and bearing fruit to a Tree or Hearbe Also it is clear that the law was added because of transgression Gal. 3.19 as if there had been no sinne there should have been no occasion of giving the law And this contradicts your self elsewhere affirming the Law to be an effectuall instrument to regenerate and sanctifie Now who needs to be regenerated and sanctified he that hath a perfect and holy nature or he that is a sinner and impure if you think otherwise what a deceiver are you when you would perswade the filthy and the vile that they may be changed and renewed by the Law of works And thus as your fourth difference is utterly false so your third is found to be defective and not plenary for all is of grace It is the Gospel or word of grace that justifieth and sanctifieth God in that ministration we live under is a free giver and man a meer receiver for God having discovered and made bare the root and heart of man so as he seeth his spirituall poverty and wretchedness by his Law doth then open his graciousness and his bountifull hand by his Gospel that the believing soul may be satisfied with his goodness in every kinde So that now as a Beggar he must live by Almes of Divine liberality being thus made to walk humbly with his God Open thy mouth and I will fill it Psa 81. 2. And in your last difference you set up and pull down say and unsay At first you tell us The Law is conditionall but the Gospel absolute but this is too clear a ground for you to abide upon therefore presently you say I finde this question a troublesome one Thus you trouble your self and others without cause Repentance and faith are no Gospel-conditions but are said to be the reason and end of the preaching of the Gospel It is preached that men may repent and believe Rom. 16.26 Luk. 14.47 yea and that they may be holy too Tit. 2.12 Ephes 4.22 Secondly The Gospel is the seed of them all as is to be cleared afterward they all grow and arise out of the doctrine of grace how then can they be conditions of it for what is a condition but that which is necessarily required that a thing may be so so that it will follow It is no Gospel where there is no faith or repentance or at least none preached to me What am I called upon to believe then The Gospel is the object of faith and in believing are we said to receive and obey it 2 Thes 1.8 The Gospel offereth pardon favour and eteruall life to sinners that they may come receive and partake of all freely yea beseeches men to be reconciled And doth not bid them go and get repentance and faith and holiness elsewhere as they can and then upon condition they bring these they shall be forgiven all their sins be reconciled and saved by the Gospel Indeed where God maketh the Gospel to be effectual there it bringeth forth these fruits there is repentance and saith to believe and it giveth no peace nor consolation to any but the believing soul so as faith is after the hearing of the Gospel so comfort is after faith Rom. 15.13 The God of all hope fill you full of peace and joy in believing In order one precedes another Gospel is preached before Faith that men may believe and then comes peace and consolation upon believing But who would argue hence that Faith is a condition of the Gospel or Peace a condition of Faith They denote a certaine Order that God is pleased to set and observe in his works and dispensations As for Mortification and Sanctification you speak of they are the effects of the Gospel for the soul thereby called and implanted into Christ beginneth to dye unto all things and to live only unto Christ and God in him so increasing with the increasings of God Col. 2.19 And Repentance admitteth of divers considerations in regard of some whereof it is Legall and of others Evangelical but of this next Lecture LECT XXVII Rom. 3.27 Where is boasting It is excluded c. IF this Question Whether the Gospel preach Repentance or no be as you affirme the foundation of Antinomanisme It then much concerneth you in this to play the man that the foundation being razed all may fall to confusion and this the rather also
hath no Sovereignty by right ascribed to him 2. That God maketh and imposeth his law with such a command to be obeyed in it doth argue his Sovereignty in his law and mans subjection to him in it as his Sovereign But. 3. In the Scripture-language and use I finde no difference between them Psal 103.19 It is said The Lord hath prepared his throne in heaven and his kingdome ruleth over all Is not this all one with Reigneth Psal 110.2 God saith to Christ Rule thou in the midst of thine enemies As did he not rule and reigne as Lord and King see Luke 19.14 We will not have this man reign over us and verse 27. Those mine enemies that would not have me reign over them bring hither and slay them before me which is meant of Christ whom the Father appointed to be ruler over all to that in ruling he reigneth and they be indifferently used still Ezek. 20 33. As I live saith the Lord surely with a mighty hand with a stretched-out arm and with fury poured out will I rule over you Here is the word Rule and yet dominion and sovereignty in ruling unto the utmost extent Also Rev. 2.27 19. 15. He shall rule them with a rod of iron doth God rule where he reigneth not It s a strange conceit and a bold assertion of you and Doctor T. let it vanish as the smoke The law hath a kingdom and so hath Grace another if we can discerne and distinguish the one from the other we need not to lessen the power of either Lastly And in what sense it is said the law doth not reign over a believer in the same and no other may it be said the law doth not rule him but this is not because either reigning or ruling power be taken from the law but that in a true and proper sense the Scripture affirmeth the believer not to be under the law but under Grace Rom. 6.14 He that knoweth not this mystery cannot stand fast in that liberty wherewith Christ hath made him free nor endure in temptation You onely and vainly repeat what you read but consute nothing there is reason why As you do not like so you cannot oppose the clear truth your spirits fail you yet add to that you bring in out of D. T. That a Christian by Christ is freed from the law and also freed to it to love it live and walk in it In regard of that righteousness and salvation he standeth in with God which is the object of his faith he is freed from it but in regard of his holy and unblamable conversation and life here below Christ by his Spirit doth set free and enlarge the heart actively to run the way of Gods commandments so that yet in walking according to this rule he is not ruled by the law but by the Spirit within proceeding from Christ unto whom he stands in subjection as unto his Soveraign Lord and King I hope you will now be satisfied and the world too at least so far as to account of us no more for Antinomians If any thing yet be darke we must consider the Gospel is a great mystery You might well have kept in those reviling and hateful words or have been better advised ere you had shot so reproachful speeches though they be Arrowes taken from the quivers of other men yet is it that you might vent some spite by them and when they return you will finde the point of them towards your self Then you give Antidotes where there is no danger of infection If any need them he may use them in stead of better M. B. He sets up free grace and Christ not who names it often his book or in pulpit but whose heart is inwardly and deeply affected with it Answ A private Christian not gifted to preach or print may be more affected with it then the Minister and yet not so set it up in the hearts of others for want of those means of communication 2. Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh If you were inwardly more affected with this doctrine you would preach and commend it more then any other as Paul who desired to know nothing but Christ Crucisied 1 Cor. 2.2 Phil. 1.20 and sought that he might be magnified whether by his life or death the main subject of his ministery was the unsearchable riches in Christ Eph. 3. 8. Consider these words of Luther in his preface to the Galations In my heart this one Article reigneth even the faith of Christ from whom by whom and unto whom all my divine studies day and night have recourse to and fro continually And I perceive that I could not reach any thing neer c. But it is a sure Argument of small reigning or power it hath in that soul whose mouth and pen is so busied to cavil and write against it Also may not another as truly say That he sets up the law not who names it often but whose heart is most sensibly and deeply affected with the power and inward work of it some would be Doctors of the law not knowing what they say nor whereof they affirm 1 Tim. 1.8 And now also who will most heartily and experimentally set up and endear Christ and free-grace he who teacheth the law to be onely a rule of life yet to have no reigning power but disableth it from cursing and condemning so that a man may bless himself and finde peace and rest in the righteousness of his owne works or he that teacheth that the law is ever revealing wrath threatning and pursuing with the dreadful curse and vengeance all that are of the works of the law in that when they have done their utmost they are come short of what it requireth and therefore it will suffer them to have no rest nor confidence save in the righteousness of God by faith Certainly this mans doctrine will much more make Christ and Free-grace desired and prized by all that have any discerning spirit and a broken and believing heart FINIS SIRS AS I have in part vindicated and cleared the lovely Truth so unworthily aspersed and used by your hands so in recompence of my great pains occasioned by you I desire that in patience you would suffer both your selves and others to see your own face and pourtracturei in your nature lineaments and colour without the least painting or mixture at all Truth rejoyceth in the light I have onely contracted and placed together some few of your assertions that were dispersed 〈◊〉 doubting but time may produce a fuller and more perâ—â—â—â—â—â—â—psâ—s and Inventory A Model of new Divinity or certain Miscellaneous Anti-evangelical inconsistent or ambiguous Positions and Tenents which the Adversaries having Decryed depressed and defaced the doctrine of Free-Grace do assert substitute and publish in Pulpit and Press Mr. Burgess 1. THe Law includeth Christ secondarily and occasionally 2. The Law given to Adam was not cursing and condemning 3. The Law hath no power to
heart no not in the least syllable of it untill it be there implanted by the faith of the Gospel Note you well this by the way And however the learned vary somewhat about this yet I can read no word favouring your odde Opinion Now come we to your Arguments Mr. B. The first shall be taken from the relation of the covenanters Argn. 1 God on the one part and the Israelits on the other God did not deal as this time as absolutely considered but as their God and their Father hence God saith he is their God And when Christ quoteth the Commands he brings the Preface Hear O Israel the Lord thy God is one Rom. 9.4 Now unless this were a Covenant of grace how could God be their God who were sinners Answ God dealt with them now not absolutely indeed but yet with relation to his promise formerly made by meanes of which he had freely chosen and taken them to be his peculiar people having long before said to Abraham I will be a God to thee and to thy seed after thee Gen. 17.7 And hereupon the constant Martyr Mr. Bradford intending to comfort one dejected and distreffed in mind upon consideration of some failing or want of obedience as I remember writeth to this effect Let this cogitation be still in your mind that before God aske any thing of us he saith he is ours I am the Lord thy God giving himself and then all he hath to be ours And this he doth in respect of himself of his own mercy and truth and not in respect of us for then were grace no grace In consideration whereof saith the Martyr Whatever he commands though of duty we be bounden to accomplish and be culpable and guilty if not yet he requireth the same no further of us then to make more in love and more certaine of this his covenant That he is our Lord God which is made in respect of his grace in Christ Jesus and dependeth nothing on our obedience So this Covenant is most free and most sure for ever and the onely refuge and plea of the soul in the hour of tentation It is more then evident then that God as now so from the first stood reconciled to his people in Christ Jesus and in him became their God and took them into that happy relation of being his people his peculiar treasure and Children And all your Scriptures if now you look on them again do hold forth this and can speak no other truth What infirmity is this Cannot God take a people into Covenant with himself and become their God and Father in Christ his Son and yet govern and put them under the Law but we must then inferre either that all his grace and favour is conditional or else the Law we are made to live under for a time is a Covenant of grace Argn. 2 Mr. B. If we consider the good things annexed to this Covenant it must needs be a Covenant of grace for there we have remission of sin whereas in the Covenant of works there is no way for repentance or pardon In the second Commandment God is described to shew mercy to thousands c. Answ If God promise and shew mercy in this way of obedience as we Parents also commonly do deal with our Children looking pleasantly upon them using them kindly c. when we find them most dutifull and tendering and receiving them lovingly and gently upon their submission after some failing will you so farre forget the truth and your self as to infer and conclude thence that the Covenant is established on our obedience It is one word and way by which we are begotten and become Children to God our Father and he may rule us and shew us favour by another word and way especially whilst we be in minority as Gal. 4.1 2 3. And what could keep the Children of Israel in the conscience of their many faults and failings from despair or what could erect their spirits and preserve still a confidence and cheerfull hope in them was it not as Mr. Bradford said That knowledge and inward perswasion that God was their Father and they his Children by a free and faithfull promise of meer grace in Christ to come Mr. B. 3. Argn. 3 If we consider the duties commanded in the Law so generally taken it must needs be a Covenant of grace for what is the meaning of the first Commandment but to have one God in Christ our God by faith Answ What is said to the other Deus Pater seipsum in Christo abscondidit ita ut nusquam alibi quam in Christo quaeramus agnoscamus c. resolveth this also for this Commandment presupposeth that God was their God and did not now by his Law become their God by promise in the Messiah to come on his part and by faith receiving it on their side And to keep them to his faith in Christ and to prevent defection or Idolatry he propounds himself to be known and acknowledged onely in Christ the promised seed saying I am thy God in my Christ that so they might love him trust and delight in him Mr. B. From the ceremonial Law Argn. 4 All Divines say That this is reduced to the Morall so that sacrifices were commanded by vertue of the second Commandment Now all know that the sacrifices were Evangelical and did hold forth remission of sins c. then there must be grace included Answ Now I understand what you would have reduced to the morall Law And in this passage of yours I observe divers strange things as 1. That the ceremoniall should be reduced to the morall as if the one were not entire and absolute of it self without the other or that they were not distinct species under the same genus the whole Ministration by Moses being divided into Law morall ceremoniall judiciall so that every of the three is absolute of it self for the matter and doctrine contained in it and in respect of the end and use it was given for 2. You cannot let us see one syllable concerning the sacrifices in the second Command The Lord delivered by the same authority he had over them and as equally and immediately required the observation of each of these which in nature and office were so distinct And the charging of Israel with all and every of them is grounded still upon this I am thy God therefore was it that his people were to be instructed governed and ordered as he pleased He signified his will and mind in the matters of faith by the ceremoniall Law 2. Touching morality and duty in the morall 3. And what concerned the polity and republique in the judiciall Law I see not but that you may as well reduce the judiciall to the first Commandment or to the second Table as the ceremoniall to the second Commandment and thus confound all making but one Law 3. And I marke another thing viz. That in this you have one eye and respect to