am that the dealings of the Lords and Commons with me demonstrated by their orders of committments flowes not from any power given them either by the Law of the Laud nor from the Indentures betwixt them and their chusers no nor yet from any word or clause in the Writ of there summons or Elections and therefore fourthly it must flow from there CROOKED IVSTS DEPRAVED VVILLS and ARBITRARY PLEASVRES by which with naked faces they declare themselves to be limitted by no boundary unaccountable and obnoxius to no censures for any possible abuse whatsoever that can becommitted by them for by these committments they evidently declare there is no rule whereby to measure the rectitude or obliquitie justice or injustice of their Government and actions and by consequence they are under an impossibilitie to render an account of their wayes and doings and so by consequence the people of England are in the absolutest road way of perfect slavery that is upon the earth this the Parliament or the Lords and Commons would have the World to beleive they abhord in the King as appeares by there last declaration against him in which they shew the reasons of their votes not to make or to receive any addresses to or from him for in Page 12 they sâ—y the King hath laid a fit foundation for all tiranny by that most destructive maxime of his viz. that he oweth no account of his actions to any but to God alone but by the warrants of my coÌ„mitments it seemes this wicked and heathenish Maxim is Iudged by the makers thereof not to be to sweete a morsell for their own Pallets though in their said declaration they judge it to sweet for the Kings and therefore to conclude this point if this honorable Court of Justice the Judges whereof are sworne to Judge according to the Law and not lust will nor pleasure will Judge these arbitrary Committments of mine to be legal then I make my humble desire unto you the Judges thereof that you would cousen and deceive the people of the Kingdome no longer by assuming unto your selves the name of Judges of the Law but rather translate your Titles into the name of Judges of lust will and pleasure that so the people may expect the legall administration of the Law no longer from you and so I have done with the Fift and last ingredient to a legall Mittimus Now Mr. Justice Bacon seeing it is objected both by you and Mr. Justice Roll that my Commitment from the Lords is rather a Sentence Judgement or Decree hen a bare Mittimus and therefore being a judgement by the Lords a higher Court for 7. yeares imprisonment I cannot be delivered by this Court which being inferiour to it cannot reverse it nor be Judges of it To which Mr. Justice Bacon I answere First I doe not seeke unto you at present for reversement of my Sentence which is 4000. l. fine and perpetuall disfranchisement of the Liberties of an Englishman as well as seven yeares imprisonment But I come unto you as Judges of the Law who are sworne impartially to doe me Law and Justice notwithstanding any command whatsoever by any whatsoever to the contrary for my personall liberty which is my undoubted right by Law for any thing that judicially appeares before you upon the Warrants of my commitments For I have already fully proved unto you there is not legally the least crime in the world laid unto my charge and therefore no rules in Law for you to send me backe againe to prison But secondly I answer that I have already proved the Lords are none of my legall Judges and therefore all their proceedings with me from first to last are corum non judici Yea even their Sentence and Commitment it selfe for being it is against the 29. Chap. of Magna Charta it is void and null in Law which expressely saith That no Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned or be dissesed of his Freehould or Liberties or free Customes or be Outlawed or exiled or any otherwise destroyed nor past upon nor condemned by the lawfull judgement of his equals or by the Law of the Land which Law of the Land is expounded by the Statute of the 25. Ed. 3.4 37. Ed. 3.18 and Sir Edward Goke in his 2. part instit fo 50.51 to be by due Processe of Law viz That none shall be taken and past upon c. by Petition or suggestion made to our Lord the King or to his Counsell undesse it be by indictment or presentment of good and lawfull men where such deeds be done in due manner or by Writ originall at the Common Law being brought in to answere by due Processes according to the common and olde Law of the Land all which c. is confirmed by the Statute that abolished the Starre-Chamber this present Parliament 17. C. R. and all Acts Ordinances Orders Judgements and Decrees made contrary thereunto or in diminution thereof are thereby declared ipso facto to be null and voide in Law and are to be holden for errors and false judgements which totally barrs and overthtowes all Presidents whatsoever to the contrary yea although the Lords had a million of them And excellent to this purpose is Sir Edward Cookes Commentary upon the 3. Ed. 1. chap. 15 but especially his Commentary upon these words viz. Or Commandement of the King First faith he the King being a body politique cannot command but by matter of Record for the King commands and the Law commands are all one for the King must command by matter of record according unto the Law Secondly When any Judiciall Act is by Act of Parliament referred to the King it is understood to be done in some Court of Justice according to the Law And the opinion of Gascoine Chiefe Justice is notable in this point that the King hath committed all his power judicall to divers Courts some in one Court some in another c. and because some Courts as the Kings Bench are Coram Rege and some coram Justiciariis therefore the Act saith by the commandernent of the King or his Justices Hussey Chiefe Justice reported that Sir John Markham said to King Ed. 4. that the King could not arrest any man for suspition of Treason or Fellony as any of his Subjects might because if the King did wrong the party could not have his action if the King command me to arrest a man and accordingly I doe arrest him hee shall have his action of false imprisonment against me albeit he was in the Kings presence resolved by the whole Court in 16. H. 6. which authority might be a good warrant to defend his said opinion to Ed. 4. The words of the Statute of the 1 R. 2. chap. 12. are unlesse it be by the Writ or other commandement of the King and it was resolved by all the Judges of England that the King cannot doe it by any commandement but by Writ or by order or Rule of some of his Courts
of Justice where the cause dependeth And saith Bracton the King can doe nothing but what he can doe by Law So as saith the Lord Cooke the command of the King is as much as to say as by the Kings Courts of justice for all matters of Judicature and proceedings in Law are distributed to the Courts of Justice and the King doth judge by his Justices 8 H. 4. fol. 19. 24. H. 8. chap. 12. and regularly no man ought to be attached by his body but either by proces of Law that is as hath been said by the Kings Writs or by Indidctment or lawfull warrant as by many Acts of Parliament is manifestly inacted and declared which are but expositions of Magna Charta and all Statutes made contrary to Magna Charta which is Lex terrae from the making whereof untill 42 Ed. 3. are declared and inacted to be void and therefore if this Act of Westminster 1. concerning the extrajudiciall commandement of the King bee against Magna Charta it is void and all resolutions of Judges concerning the coÌ„mandement of the King are to be understood of judiciall proceedings a part insti fo 186.187 Therefore Mr. Justice Bacon it is to no purpose for you to tell me I am committed by a higher Court and therefore you cannot legally deliver mee for I aver unto you and have already sufficiently proved it that I am commitmitted contrary to Law and Justice and therefore you being Judges of the Law and not of Presidents grounded upon will and pleasure You are to take notice of nothing but Law and therefore I demand and require my liberty at your hands as my undoubted right and due by Law which you can neither in justice honour nor conscience deny unto me But admit the Lords to be a superiour Court of justice to the Kings Bench in some cases yet if they walke beyond their bounds and limits set them by the Law and meddle with that which by Law they have no Jurisdiction of in that case they are no Court of Justice either to you or me but a company of despisers and contemners of the Law all whose actions and decrees made and done in such cases are but meere affronts unto the Law and unvalid and unbinding either to you or me or any other man in England in disobedience to which they by Law are not capable of a contempt or affront nor cannot legally punish any in such a case either with fine or imprisonment as for instance First if a court of SESSIONS which is a Court in many cases by Law questions me for my Freehould and I give them contemptuous words for medling with that which they have no Jurisdiction of they by Law can neither fine nor imprison me therefore Secondly the same holds good in the COMMON PLEAS which is an unquestionable administrative Court of Justice in divers cases yet if they go about to hold plea of murder before them if the party refuse to answere them It is in Law no contempt of the Court And if the Court shall therefore fine and imprison him it is illegall erronious and unbinding because in Law they have no Jurisdiction of such cases Thirdly and pertinent to this purpose is BAGGS CASE in the 11. Part of Cooks Reports who being summoned before the Mayer of Plimoth in open Court called him cozening Knave and bade him come kisse c. For which the Mayor Disfranchised him and it was resolved in Law that the the Disfranchisment was illegall and the reason of is was because it was not according to Law for that the Mayor in Law had no power to doe it Fourthly sutable to this is the complaint of ARCHBISHOP BANCROFT and the Judges answer to it which said Archbishop in his 22. Article to the Lords of the Privie Counsell in the 3. of King James complaines against the Judges of the Courts of Justice in Westminster Hall for affronting the actions proceedings and Censures of the High Commission Court which was erected by Act of Parliament viz. 1 Eliz. and had power by King Iames his Letters Patents to Fine and IMPRISON and yet as he complaines as you may read 2 Part. instit fo 615. 4 Part. instit fol. 335. The Judges were growne to that innovating humor of late that whereas certaine lewd persons two for example one for notorious Adultery and other intollerable contempts and another for abusing of a Bishop of this Kingdome by threatning speeches and sundry rayling tearmes no way to be endured were thereupon fined and imprisoned by the High Commissioners till they should enter into bonds to performe further orders of the said Court the one was delivered by HABEAS CORPVS out of the Kings Bench and the other by a WRIT out of the Common Pleas and sundry other prohibition have been likewise awarded to His Majesties said Commissioners upon these suggestions that they had no authority to fine or imprison any man c. Which practices and doings the Judges in their answers thereunto justifie to be legall and no more then that which they are bound unto by their Oath for that the high Commission had gone beyond the legall power of their jurisdiction having no power by law to fine and imprison in those cases and therefore the Law being the surest Sanctuary that a man can take and the strongest fortresse to protect the weakest of all it ought not to be denied to the meanest man that demands it against the greatest seeming legall oppressor that act of violence or wrong being most hatefull of all others when it is done by uncontinuance of justice and therefore that man which legally indeavours deliverance from it ought from the judges of the Law by Magna Charta to have it freely without sale fully without any deniall and speedily without delay in which regard the aforesaid Judges did not only justifie their forementioned legall practice but also fall very foule upon the Arch-Bishop c. for taxing the Judges and Iustice of the Kingdom confidently averâ—ing that for lesse scandalls then his c. in taxing the Iustice of the Kindow divers have been severely punished And Sir Edward Cooke in the 4 part of his institutes Chap. of the high Commission Court in causes Ecclesiasticall fo 331.332.333.334 335. instances divers others that for notable Ecclesiasticall crimes were fined and imprisoned by the high Commissioners and upon demanding their right from the Judges of the Courts of Justice in Weslminster Hall they were relieved and released by them by the strength of those nerves and sinewes of the Law Prohibitions and Habeas Corpusses But above all the rest that he there mensions Iohn Simpsons case in the 42. Eliz. is the most remarkable to my purpose which Simpson being accused for committing adultery with the Wife of Edward Fuste over which case by Law the high Commissioners had Iurisdiction whereupon the high Commissioners issued out there warrent to Richard Butler Constable of Aldrington in the County of Northamton for
in Irons for High-Treason in levying Warre by the Parliaments Command against the King he nobly told me he would give me the utmost priviledge that the Law of England would afford me and further declared unto me it was my right by Law to plead for my selfe and say whatsoever I could for my selfe which he freely without any interruption gave me leave to do and Sir I hope you will not be more unjust unto me then the Pagan Roman Judges were to Paul or the Caviliers to my selfe at Oxford in denying me my priviledge to speake and plead for my selfe Whereupon Mr. Justice Bacon replied and said Sir it is a favour that you are permitted to plead by councell Sir said I by your favour I doe not judge it so and besides I desire Mr. Iustice Bacon with all respect unto you and desire to let you know I do not com here to beg boones or courtisies at your hands but I come here to claime my right do with confidence tell you Sir that it is not only my undoubted naturall right by the light and Law of nature yea and by the ancient common Law of England to plead my owne cause my selfe if I please but it is also the naturall and undoubted right of every individuall Englishmen yea and of every man upon the face of the Earth in what Countrey soever and therefore Sir I demand from you liberty to specke frealy for my selfe not only by the Law of nature but also by the ancient Common law of England freely telling you that I Judge my cause of that consequence to my selfe and all the Commons of England that I will trust never a Lawyer in the Kingdome to plead for me and therefore againe demand to as my right leave to plead my selfe the which if you will not grant me I have done and haue no more to say to you whereupon the Iudges commanded the lawyers to make me roome and called me closse to the Barr where I did my respect unto them and they caused the returne to be read which consisted of my commitment from the Lords the 11 of Iuly 1646 my commitment from the Commons 19 Ian 1647 and a late order of the commons to command the Lievetenant of the Tower upon removeall of his prisoners not to remove the 4 Aldermen nor Sir Iohn Maynard nor my selfe which returne in the conclusion hereof I shall insert and then as I conceive because some of the returne was latten Iudge Bacon askt me if I understood it and I said yes for I had cause enough given me so to doe whereupon he begun to tell me I might easily perceive I was Committed by the Lords upon a Centence and begun to amplifie their power as a superior court whose actions were not to be questioned or controled by the Judges of the Kings Bench because they were inferior to them Unto which I replied Sir I desire the returne may be ordered to be entered upon record and this I pressed diverse times and desired that if the Lieutenant had any thing to add to the returne he might now speak or else forthwith it might be made a record and he thereby debarred of making additions to it which was accordingly done and then I pressed to be hard and said Mr. Justice Bacon I desire to keep you close to my businesse which is thus I am in prison and having no crime laid unto my charge by those that do commit me as clearly appears unto your Honor by the returne for generalls you know better then I doe are no charge nor crimes in Law and therefore according to the law I crave leave to make my exceptions against the return when I have done I shall willingly submit my discourse my cause and my person to your Judgements and consciences but I pray heare what I can say for my selfe and my liberty or if you will not command me silence I will obey you And then Mr. Justice Roll spoke like wise to the Lords power and would also have staved me of from going on but I prest still to be heard what I could say against the returne and he prest me to keepe close unto it and not be extravigant in medling with impertinences but I told him I did not know what he would judge impertinences therefore prest hard to be heard telling him if I spoke that which by Law I could not Justifie they might the easier tript up my heales but I assured him I was an honorer of Magistracy as being the chiefe meanes God had appointed to keepe the world in order and therefore I was resolved to speak with all honour respect both unto their office and persons so I had leave granted to go on and having my plea in a readinesse writ I put on my spectacles held it before me as the Lawyers do there Briefes and begun and said as was contained in my paper which I shall give you as I had pend it before I came to the barre though I confes I had many bickering interruptions by both the Iudges which in the best manner my memory will serve me I shall note in the Magent as I goe on with my discourse which thus followeth Mr. Justice Bacon I doe ingeniously confesse that I judge Universall safety to be above all Law and that it is the ouldest Law of any in the Kingdom and therefore I shall not dispute in the least the Parliaments irregular actions that they were necessitated too for common preservation in the height of the Warres but the Warres being ended as they themselves declare they are in their late Declaration against the Scotch Commissioners and thereby the affaires of the Kingdome reduced into a more peaceable and hopefull condition then heretofore wherefore I may now groundedly from the full streame of all their Declarations and promises expect challenge and looke for the absolute benefit of the Law and the common justice of England in the ordinary courts of Justice thereof which they have declared and promised they will not now enterrupt See their Declaration of the 17. of April 1646. 2 Part. Book Declam pag. 879 and their Ordinance of none addresses to the King in Ianuary last where they promise the people though they lay the King aside yet they will notwithstanding governe them by the Law and not to interrupt the ordinary course of Justice in the ordinary courts thereof And therefore Mr. Justice Bacon I am not a little glad that I stand before you at this Barre of Justice which is bounded by the Law where I never was before for seeing that the great Judge of all the world Stiles himselfe to be a God of judgement Esa 30.18 and further saith of himselfe That I the Lord love judgement and hate robbery for burnt offerings Esai 61.8 and therefore layes his command upon Judges those gods upon earth Psal 82.6 That they shall defend the Poore and Fatherlesse and doe justice to the afflicted and needy and deliver them out
these should assuredly produce disorder and darknesse and bring the whole body out of order and in the end to distruction so in the commonwealth Justice being the main preserver thereof if one Court should usurp or incroach upon another it would introduce incertainty subvert Iustice and bring all things in the end to confusion But Sir I shall at present in this place spare the full opening of my plea in this particular and reserve it to the place most fit for it And therefore I shall infist upon the 2 part of my plea which is that the matter and forme of my Warants of commitments are illegall the legality of which ought as Sir Edward Coke declares in his 2. part instit which is published by the present House of Commons for good law to the Kingdom as appeares fol. ult who therein fol. 52.590.591 expressely saith 5. things are essentiall in Law to the making of a commitment lawfull viz. 1. That is be by dur Processe or proceeding in Law 2. That he or they that do commit have lawfull authority 3. That this warrant or mittimus be lawfull and that must be in writing under his hand and Seale 4. The cause must be contained in the Warant or Mittimus and that not in generall termes but in particular as for treason then for what particular Treason and of for fellony then for what particular felony and if for misdemeanours then for what particular misdemeanour 5. The Mittimus containing a lawfull cause must also have a lawfull conclusion viz. and him safely to keep untill he be delivered by due course of Law and not untill the party committing please or doth further order or for 7. yeares Now Mr. Justice Bacon all and every of these particulars I doe averre is wanting in both my Commitments For first there was no due Processe of Law against me no Bill filed or Indictment preferred nor no legall complaint exhibited against me neither did I see any legall prosecutor before I was originally committed no nor not to this present houre although I have been almost two yeares in Prison First in Newgate and then secondly in the Tower devorsed from my wife debarred of my friends deprived of pen Inck and paper But I desire to cease this at present and go on to the main things And therefore 2. I aver that by the known Law of this Land neither of the Speakers of either House nor neither House themselves have the least shaddow or colour by any declared and known Law of England to commit the meanest Commoner of England that is not one of there members to prison either for treason the highest crime for that is expresly to be tryed by the common Law by people of the neighbourhood of the same condition as appeares by the 25 Edward 3 chap. 2. and 1. 2. Phillip Mary Chap. 10. yea and it lyes not in the whole Parliaments power to punish any man for any crimes which they shall call treasons but what is cleerly declared and fully expressed to be treason by the statute the 25 Edward 3 Chap. a as appeares by 1 H. 4 Chap 10. and the 1 M. Chap 1. Or for breach of the peace although it be in affronting beating or wounding of any Parliament man for that is expresly ta be tried in the Kings Bench. 5 H 4 Chap. 6. and 11 H. 6 Chap. 11 Yee although a sherife by law is to pay 100 l. to the King and to suffer a Years Imprisonment c. without Baile or mainprise for every false returne of a Knight of the Shire that he makes yet by Law neither Houses are to be Judges in this very businesse so immediately concerning the House of Commons but it shall be examined and tryed before the Justices of Assises in the Sessions of Assise 8. H. 6. Chap. 7. 23. H. 6. Chap. 15. yea the Parl. or the House of Commons are not to punish those that will not pay them their wages for their service done in the Parl but the refusers are to be punished by the legall administrators of the Law in the ordinarte Courts of Iustice 23. H. 6 Chap. 11. Now Sir if the Parliament or the two Houses either conjoyned or divided cannot exercise executive Justice in these things so nighly concerning themselves much less in things more remote as my case is who if I were guilty of the thing layd unto my Charge yet they are only and alone tryable and punishable at the Common Law and not in an arbitrary uncertain way in either or both Houses the rules of which certainly no man in heaven or earth knoweth and saith that worthiest of English Lawyers Sir Edward Cook in the Proem to the third part of his Institutes It is a miserable servitude or slavery where the Law is uncertain or unknown And I know you know it is a received Maxim in Law that the Parliament is not to medle with judging or punishing that which appertains and belongs to the Common Law but my pretended crimes have their punishments appointed by the Common Law and are there only to be tryed and punished and therefore in the least belongs not unto the Parliaments Cognisance or Jurisdiction Nay the Parliament men themselves for Treason Felony and breach of the Peace are not priviledged in the least from tryals at Common Law as appears by the fourth part Institutes fol. 25. and the Lords and Commons confess the same in their Declarations 1. part pag. 48. 278. The Common Law of England which is right reason or as Sir Edward Cook stiles it the absolute perfection of reason 2 part Instit fol. 179. hateth all partiality or faction in tryals which would unavoydably be if the Law-makers should in any case be the Law-executioners and besides the legal benefit of final appeals to the high Court of Parliament which I judg in Law to be the whole and intire Parliament and not a single House would be hereby totally destroyed for if they should be impowered by Law to be Executers of it and should as it is possible they may do me wrong injustice I am thereby by power destroyd with out remedy which the Law abhors and therefore the wisdom and reason of the Law is such to betrust Judges that rationally are liable to an account in full Parliament and them only to be sole Executors and Dispensers of the Law betwixt party and party and not to betrust the whole Parliament or any part of it with the executing of the Laws but only to betrust them as their fittest work with a power to repeal those Laws that are amiss and to establish and make better in their places But the Laws while they remain Laws and unrepealed are as binding by Law to themselves as the meanest men in England and they have no priviledg of exemption from them saving in freedom of speech within their respective Houses for which they have an act of Parliament to indempnifie them as appears by the 4. H. 8.
ch 8. and freedom from arrests for them and their servants c. during the sitting of Parliament which the Law supposeth not to be long much less seven years which is a destruction to our fundamental rights viz. Annual Parliaments or at least Annual Elections as appears by the 4. Edw. 3. cha 14. 36. Ed. 3. ch 10. both which are confirmed this present Parliament by the triennial act in 16. Car. Rex and yet if any Parliament-mans servant be imprisoned the House of Commons themselves by Law cannot deliver him but it must be by a Writ out of Chancery and the member must make oath that the party for whom the Writ of priviledg is prayed for was his servant at the time of the arrest made all which appears in the Case of one Mr Hall the 22. of Feb. 18. Eliz. whose servant being arrested and imprisoned a Committee of the House reported to the House they could find no presidents for the delivery of him but in the way before mentioned whereupon Mr Hall was appointed by the House to go to the Lord Keeper and to do accordingly And if they cannot deliver one that belongs to themselves and priviledged by the Law of Parliament but not by the known declared Law of the Land nor punish him themselves that in the execution of the Common Law of England broke their priviledges much less in Reason and Justice can they commit or release one that is far remote from them and doth not by priviledg belong unto them the last of which is my present case and therefore no colour in Law hath the House of Commons to commit me to prison And as for the House of Lords the Petition of Right expresly saith That no man ought to be adjudged to death c. but by the established Laws of the Land and the express established Law of the Land is That no Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned or be deseised of his freehold or liberties or free customs or be out-lawed or exiled nor condemned or any otherwise destroyed but by the lawful judgment of his Peers viz a Jury of his Equals of the same neighbourhood where the crime is committed being brought in to answer by due process of Law by Indictment Presentment or Writ original according to the course of Common Law but the Lords are none of my Peers or Equals and therefore are none of my legal Judges nor have not the least Jurisdiction in any case whatsoever in the world over me And though they should have a thousand presidents to shew they have exercised Jurisdiction in the like case of mine they are worth nothing because they are all and every of them against the 29 Chap. of Magna Charta and are therefore expresly declared by the Statute that abolished the Star Chamber 17. Car. Rex this present Parliament to be null and voyd in Law and to be holden for Errors and false Judgments And as for presidents against the Lords and Commons Jurisdiction in my particular case one president against them is of more consequence then a thousand for them and the reason is evident because as Sir Edward Cook often declares all Courts of Judicature are bottomed upon the Law of the Land and it cannot be supposed that any Court can be miscognizant or ignorant of its proper Jurisdiction And for the Lords they have confessed in the 4. of Edw. 3. Rot. Parl. 2. in the case of Sir Simon De Berisford that it is against the Law for Peers to try Commoners and have promised and enacted or at least ordained that they neither shall nor will do the like again though that occasion were superlative viz. about the absolute murther of King Edward the second And Secondly although the Maior c. of the Corporation of Cambridg were by the Kings Writ out of Chancery summoned before King Richard the second in full Parliament and there impeached of horrible Treason committed and acted in levying War against their soveraign Lord and King and being expresly within the Statute of Treasons made in the 25 of Edward the 3. Cha. 2. And though they surrendred up the Charters of Cambridg in open Parliament unto the will and pleasure of the King as forfeited into his hands by their Treason and Rebellion yet as to the point of Treason they by their Councel expresly pleaded that the King and his Lords assembled in Parliament had no Cognizance or Jurisdiction there to medle with Treasons committed by them and saith the Record which under the Register or Record Keepers hand of the Tower I have to shew unto your Honor if you please to have it read they alledged divers reasons therefore and the King and the Lords by their silence allowed of their plea as good in Law and let them go without any punishment there for their notorious Treasons as appeareth Rot. Parl. 5. Rich. 2. membrana 9. num 45.58 59. which is supposed in reason they would never have done if their own consciences and knowledg had not told them that by Law they had not the least Jurisdiction in the world over Commoners in any case whatsoever For if not in Treason the highest then much less in misdemeanors the inferiorest which is the most that ever they layd to my charge And if the King and Lords have not Jurisdiction over Commoners much less the Lords without the King and much less that House of Lords that hath layd the King their fountain of power and honor aside as unfit to be addressed unto any more and yet have not essentially or avowedly altered the Government of the Kingdom seeing by their Writ of summons and all their own Declarations they own nor challenge no power unto themselves but what they derive from him and therefore by their own principles and by the Law it self they have unpowered themselves and totally overthrown and destroyed their Jurisdiction and now cannot legally or rationally be called a Court of Justice or a House of Parliament in any sence as clearly appears by the 4 part Instit chapt High Court of Parliament fo 1.366.46 the King being in Law as Sir Edward Cook there declares the head the beginning and the ending of the Parliament and in reason it is impossible where there is no primitive there should be any derivative and therefore I do positively conclude that the Lords have both by Law and Reason unpowered themselves and destroyed their House from being a House in any sence and therefore have not the least shadow or colour of Jurisdiction over me or any Commoner of England And besides I find in the time of this present Parliament many Presidents of the House of Commons in putting out their extraordinary necessitated power to redeem and rescue the Commons of England out of the devouring paws of the Lords illegal and usurped a Here Judg Bacon interrupted me and told me they could not suffer the Lords to be arraigned before them in that manner that I did and therefore pressed
Cofers at their pleasure full and get in to them all the money of England therefore let rich men look about them in this particular and in a second regard also more dangerous then this forasmuch as it concerns life let all men I say look well about them for I am confident of this that I suffer so much Barbarism from Cromwel and his Creatures who are not willing to come to a tryal with me for the Leiutenant of the Tower hath already denyed me the benefit of the Law of England in not obeying my first Habeas Corpus and would not suffer me without fresh strugling to come to a legal tryal and thereby have before the sun convicted themselves of wickedness and unrighteous dealing with me for saith Christ John 3.20 Every one that doth evil hateth the light neither commeth to the light lest his deeds should be reproved or discovered I say I am confident I suffer so much from Cromwel c. for opposing and throwing down the Lords Tyranny which he did and still is evident he doth intend to make the arbitrary yet seeming legal ax to chop off the head of every man in England he hath a mind to destroy any otherwise then by wilful murder as he did Richard Arnal at Ware and having been under God the chief Instrument to break him of that damnable and wicked design he and his Creatures therefore are as mad at me as so many mad men c. Although they have done so much already in destroying the Law and setting up Arbitrary Tyranny that I will make it good with my life divers of them viz. of the House of Lords c. better deserve Tower hill therefore then ever Srafford did but what a company of foolish silly Creatures are Cromwel and his confederate Grandees who would pretend to give those Commoners of England a tryal according to Law and Justice ☞ whose lives they would take away by a tryal before the Lords * Here I began and said Sir what an errational thing is it for the Lords to go about at their bar to try Commoners for their lives when as men that know the Law c. when as men that know the Law of England fully knows that if the present Lords were a true House of Lords as before I have fully proved they are not yet they were not able legally to try one of themselves for though the body of their House in case they were twelve or eighteen and under they cannot be should be in the nature of a grand Jury and petty Jury and so the Judges of matter of Fact yet they must have a Judg of matter of Law too and that must be a Lord high Steward which they neither have nor are able legally to make and therefore have no colour of power in Law to try one of themselves much less a Commoner that is none of their Peer or equal whom the Law hath again and again expresly prohibited them to meddle with but enough for the Lords at present and now two things more distinctly for the House of Commons First admit they had a Jurisdiction in executing the Law which I have before already fully proved they have not yet all Courts of Justice established by Law in England are bound and tyed to Judg no man but by witnesses sworn according to the Law they being the evidence to the Jury and Judg 3. part instit fol. 163. But they never put Masterson my accuser to his oath in his Information he delivered against me although he were but a single informer never any man of all the large company besides himself appearing against me and therefore no shadow or colour for the House of Commons to adjudg or condemn me to prison thereupon seeing no man whatsoever can be condemned by any Court in England without witnesses sworn against him according to Law but if he had delivered what he did deliver against me upon his oath it had been never the legaller because they have no power nor never had to administer an oath and therefore cannot by the Law of England in the least pretend any Jurisdiction over me in cases Criminal or any power at all to commit me to prison for where the Court hath no authority to hold plea of the Cause there all proceedings are Coram non Judice and there perjury though Masterson had sworn never so falsly cannot be committed and so against all reason a man is left at liberty to say without fear of punishment what he please because it being not in a Judicial Proceeding no perjury can be committed by Law and that the House of Commons hath no power to administer an oath is evident in that the Law gives them none nor they never practised it and therefore if they would now put it in use they cannot legally of themselves now begin to do it For as learned Cook saith in his Chapter of perjury 3. part instit fol. 165. An oath is an affirmation or denyal of any thing lawful and honest before one or more that have authority to give the same for advancement of truth and right calling Almighty God the searcher of all hearts to witness that his Testimony is true so that saith he an oath is so sacred and so deeply concerning the Consciences of Christian men as the same cannot be administred to any unless the same be allowed by the Common Law or by some Act of Parliament neither can any oath saith he allowed by the Common Law or by Act of Parliament be altered but by Act of Parliament no nor a new oath raised and therefore he declares it to be a high contempt of the Law of England for any man to administer an oath without warrant of Law and to be punished by fine and imprisonment and of all a And here I skipped seven or eight lines to this mark ☞ oaths in use in England This oath of Confirmation for deciding and ending of Controversies is the only and alone warrantable oath by the Law of God Mat. 5.34 35 36 37. and Heb. 6.16 17. James 5.12 And as for other oaths I know no use in the world of them for those men that do not love things that are excellent for the excellency inherent in them will never love nor honor them for oaths sake But ☞ the House of Commons wanting a legal power to administer an oath it is a clear demonstration and proof that they have no power or Jurisdiction at all in Law to decide Controversies betwixt a man and his neighbour especially in times of peace when all the ordinary Courts of Justice are open and therefore have no shadow or colour in Law to adjudg or commit any man that is not a Member of them to prison And in b But all this president to avoid disputes I skipt over for the Judges prest that the House of Commons owned the Lords Jurisdiction in some cases to which I answered I owned it as well as they and
me that now before them I had said for my self because my adversaries were transcendantly pocent who by their wills and pleasures had in some kind destroyed men of more power and greatnesse then all the Lawyers at the Bar and therefore Sir though I am acquainted with some Lawyers that sometimes plead at this Bar. yet peradventure my respects and obligations may be such unto them that it cannot stand with honour justice or conscience for me to desire them to plead my cause seeing I am confident they cannot do it with safety and for me to expect that from them or put that upon them that in mine owne conscience I do verily believe will be their ruine in their practise and lively hoods when I am not able in any reasonable manner to requite them I should in my owne thoughts render my selfe the basest and unworthiess of men Whereupon Mr. Justice Bacon begun to speake and to make a kind of reply or answer unto divers of the things I had infisted upon and told me that Sir Edward Cooke in the 4. Part of his instituts whom he did see I had very much studied saith That no inferiour Court could meddle to question Judgements of Parliament and after a pretty large speech told me I was committed upon a centence from a Superiour Court whose judgements by Law they neither were able nor could controule and therefore must of necessity remand me back again and after he had done I replyed Sir it is true the Judgements of Parliament is not to be questioned by inferiour Courts alwaies provided they meddle with that which by Law appertaines to the Judgement of the Parliament which the executing of Lawes in the Originall Judgeing and desiding of deferences doth not the least And besides Mr. Justice Bacon you doe not I hope in Law Judge the Lords House singly or the House of Commons single to be the Parliament true it is sir severall statutes in Queene Elizabeths time as the 27. Chap. 8. 31. ch 1. provides That if any find himselfe agreeved by false judgements in the inferior Courts he shall if he please by a Writ of Error sue in the high Court of Parliament which I cannot beleeve in Law is meant the Lords House *âŽ* And it is the most irrationall thing in the world to say that legally no Law can be binding but that which is made by the consent of the King Lords and Commons and yet to prefor a single judgement of the Lords made without all forme shaddow colour or pretence of Law above all the Acts of Parliament made for 3. or 400. yeares together for this I will offer to all the Lawyers in England and challeng them to shew me one Statute or a peece of a Statute to justifie the Lords proceedings against me in Law and I will be willing to lose my head and to bee cut in ten thousand peeces and besides it is most irrationall for the Lords who never pertended to any power but what they derived from the King to immagine or go about to make the world beleeve that they can by their wills destroy all the Lawes of England as in their dealing with me they have done when the King their fountain of power can doe no Judiciall action but by his Courts of Justice and that in the legall method manner or processe of the Law although by Law a thousand times more is given and instated into him then unto all the Lords of England and for the truth of this see the 2. part inst f. 168 186. 187 yea if the King imprison me illegally by his owne Warrant either in matter or form I have my remedy against him at law as appears by the Act that abolished the Star-Chamber and therefore it is the height of erationally to conceive or say that the Lords will shall be Lord Paramount above the will of the King their Fountain and Creator and the power of the Law which is above Him from whom they derive all they have or can pretend vnto and I am sure the law tells me that in the Courts of Justice which is established and bounded by the law and is administred adjudged and executed by sundry Judges and Ministers of the Law is betrusted a full and ample power for tryall of property of lands and goods and for the conservation of the people of this Realm in peace and quietnesse but I am sure by the Judges remitting of me back to prison there is a failer of Justice which the Law abhors and an insufficiency in the Law to deliver me from destruction by lust will and pleasure and therefore without dispute slaves are the people of Eng. in the highest and slaves they must continue if they spedily rouse not up their spirits stand stifly for their rights single for the further and due examination of the said judgement in such manner as is used in erroneous judgments in the Court of Kings Bench but the law gives not the Parliament much lesse the single House of Lords the least cognizance in the world originally to meddle with any thing betwixt party and party and if they doe I am sure by the law in force at this day it is corum non judicii but the Lords originally summoned me to their Bar be for any charge exhibited or any indictment proferred or any visible complanant or prosecutor appearing and their high commission and Spanâ—sh Iâ— quisition-like examined me upon interrogatories and so committed me to prison for which they have no shadow of ground in law Whereupon Mr. Justice Roll stept up confirmed that which his Brother Bacon had already said telling me that the Chancery and the Court of Admirals proceedings were diverse from those statutes I had alleadged as well as the proceedings in Parliament were and yet were Lex terrae and it is positively said he the law of the Land that an inferiour court as ours is cannot reverse the judgment of a superiour Court as the Lords are which we must of necessity do if we should release you which we cannot doe if we would without medling with the merit of the cause from the beginning and then the way ought to be by writ of Errour which said he will not lye in this Court in a Judgment given in the Lords House and therefore you must rest content it had been well for you you had pleaded these things before the Lords in your plea there aaginst their jurisdiction Sir said I I did so and they sent me to prison therfore not only so but in Newgate close imprisoned me therefore and would not suffer my wife to come into the Prison yard so much as to speak with me I also appealed to the House of Commons and solely put my selfe upon their Justice and Judgement but I sound them for almost these two years together deaf both unto Justice Law and reason and now as my last legall refuge I come to you after I have been almost two years in
convert all my zeale to presse all the Commons of England out of all the Counties thereof to hasten up to Westminster to the Lords House and there at their dore susser the Lordn to bore them through their cares as their Vass is and slaves being heir actions clearly and dayly declare they never intended them any freedom Law or Justice and absolutely it is a vaine thing and time meerely lost from their hands to expect any so Judge Roll concluded and said they were upon their Oathes and as Judges of the Law they could do no other bat remand me to prison againe unto which ipaciently stooped and came away but had much ados to get out of the Hall by reason of the extraordinary crowde And the next day sending to see what was entered in the booke about me the Clarke or Regester sents me a paper in these words Munday after five weekes of Easter in the 24. of King Charles Tower of London Iohn Lilburne Gentleman brought here into the Court upon an Habeas Corpus by Robert Titchburne Esquire Lieutenant of the Tower of London and the returne of the said Habeas Corpus being read he being committed by the Lords and Commons in this Parliament of England assembled it is ordered that he shall be remitted O superlative Justice was ever any man committed or remanded to prison before by those Judges that in open Court declare he hath been already almost 2. yeares in prison for nothing and now also they have no crime to lay to his charge which is my case but to draw to a conclusion I desire to fulfill my promise and give you a sight of the returne which thus followeth J Robert Titchbourne Esquire Keeper of the Tower of London according to a shore Writ of our Lord the King to this scedule annexed certifie That Iohn Lilbourne Gentleman in the said Writ mentioned was committed and is detained in my custody by vertue of an Order made the eleveth day of Iuly 1646 by the Lords in the present Parliament of England assembled and then sitting the tenour and scope of which Order followeth in these words Die Sabbati undecimo Iulii 1646. ORdered by the Lords in Parl. assembled That John Lilburn being sentenced by this House shall for his high contempt and misdemeanour done to this high Court according to the said sentence stand committed to the Tower of London for the space of 7. yeares next after the date hereof And that the Lioutenant of the said Tower of London his deputy or deputies are to keepe him in safe custody accordingly And that he do take care that the said L. C. John Lilburn do neither contrive publish or sptead any seditious or libellous Pamph lets against both or either Houses of Parliament Iohn Brawne Cler. Parl. To the Lieutenant of the Tower of London his Deputy or Deputies And further I certifie our Lord the King that afterward to wit upon the 18. day of Ian. 1647. It was ordained by the Commons in the said Parl. assembled as followeth in these words Die Martis 18. Ian. 1647. Resolved c. That the Licutenant of the Tower be hereby required to bring up to the Bar of this House to morrow morning at nine of the Clock L. Coll. Iohn Lilburne his Prisoner Hen. Elsynge Clar. Parl. D. Com. By vertue of which I the said Rob Tichbourn the said Iohn Lilbourn brought up to the laid House of Commons in the said Parl assembled by whâ—â—â— afterward the said Iohn Lilburne was againe committed to wit upon the 19. day of Jan. 1647. to my custody and in like manner is detained by vertue of an order made by the said Commons in Parliament assembled the tenour of which order followeth in these words By vertue of an Order of the House of Common these are to require you to receive from the Sergeant at Armes or his Debutie the body of L. Col John Lilbourne into the Tower of London and him there to detaine in safe Custody as your Prisoner in Order to his tryall according to Law be being committed for treasonable and seditions practices against the state and for so doing this shall be your warrant Dated Jan. 19. 1647. Wil. Lenthall Spâ—â—â—â—â— To the Lieutenant of the Tower of London The said Iohn Lilburn is also detained in my Custodie by vertue of another Order made by the said CoÌ„mons in the said Parl assembled the tenour of which Order follovveth inthese words Die Martis 18 April 1648. Resolved c that the 4. Aldermen of London Col Lilburne for Iohn May and do continue in the Tovvervv thout being removed from thence H. Elsing Cler. Parl. D. C. These are the causes of the keeping and detaining the said Iohn Lilburne in my enstody whose bodie before our Lord the King at the day and place in the said vvrit contained I have ready as by the said vvrit is commanded Robert Titchburne Keeper of the Tovver of Lonodn So deare friend with my service presented to you I rest yours faithfully John Lilburne Tower the 15. of May. 1648. FINIS