Selected quad for the lemma: law_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
law_n civil_a government_n power_n 4,282 5 4.9624 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A57286 A Rowland for an Oliver: or, a sharp rebuke to a sawcy levite In answer to a sermon preach'd by Edward Oliver, M.A. before Sir Humphry Edwin late Lord Mayor of London, at St. Paul's Cathedral, on Sunday October 22. 1698. By a lover of unity. Ridpath, George, d. 1726. 1699 (1699) Wing R1462A; ESTC R219686 15,209 25

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

A Rowland for an Oliver Or a Sharp REBUKE TO A Sawcy Levite IN ANSWER To a Sermon Preach'd By EDWARD OLIVER M. A. Before Sir Humphry Edwin late Lord Mayor of London at St. Paul's Cathedral on Sunday October 22. 1698. By a Lover of Vnity Printed in the year 1699. and sold by the Booksellers of London and Westminster AN ANSWER TO Mr. Oliver's Sermon IT was a Circumstance peculiar to the Deliverance of the Children of Israel out of Egypt that not so much as a Dog moved his Tongue against them and such a Circumstance perhaps as the Church is in no Age to expect the like The King and Parliament have thought fit to set the Dissenters at Liberty and to give them a Manumission from their more than Egyptian Taskmasters in which every true Protestant rejoic'd as hoping that it might be an effectual Preparative to unite Protestants among themselves at home and that it would tend to confirm and strengthen the Protestant Interest abroad But a certain Party of the Church of England have notwithstanding the concurrence of the greatest and best of her Bishops in settling the said Liberty by a Law been always uneasy and peevish since and constantly bawling against Dissenters and not content with a Badg of servitude still fix'd upon them by which they are excluded not only from all Ecclesiastical Preferments or Benefices but from all places of power and trust in the Civil Government nothing will satisfy them except they have liberty to bite and devour their dissenting Brethren as in former Reigns And it 's very well known not only what heavy Censures his Majesty has lain under by that Party because of his Fatherly Protection granted to Christians of all Denominations but what Obstruction they laid in the way of his Affairs in Council Parliament Army and Navy nay how uneasy the● have made him in his very Houshold so th●t it would seem highly necessary that a due Enquiry should be made by what secret Springs those Persons are acted that continue thus to foment Divisions amongst us It is worthy our observation that this spirit of Discord at home seems to be invigorated and gather strength at the same time when the spirit of Persecution rages afresh against the Protestants abroad It is not at all to be doubted but as C●in was stir'd up against his Brother Abel by that wicked one that all his Successors in Persecution are still influenc'd by that same malignant Spirit who hath been a Murderer from the beginning but at the same time it cannot be denied that Satan makes use of Men as his Instruments to sow division and discord Nor is it unworthy our Observation that as the Papists abroad and our implacable Ceremony-mongers at home have their Spirits fermented at one and the same time it is also in a great measure for one and the same Cause viz. because they cannot bring all Men to submit to their Ceremonies and Modes of Worship of human Institution and in truth of the two our English Formalists seem to be the least excusable because they own themselves not to be infallible disown human Tradition as a Rule of Faith and in all their Controversies with the Papists make use of the same Arguments against the Church of Rome that we make use of against the Ceremonies and Discipline of the Church of England They are still the more blame-worthy because formerly they laid the charge upon the Government that these things which are the subject of discord were still continued amongst us but now that we have a Prince who hath solicited that his Subjects might be united and those things that are the Cause of Contention remov'd they are so far from complying with him in it that they are ready to fly in his face upon that account This if we may believe Dr. Burnet the present Bishop of Salisbury who cannot be suspected of partiality in the case was far from being the temper of the Church of England-Bishops at least the best of 'em in Queen Elizabeth's days that Learned and Moderate Bishop in his Letters containing an Account of what seem'd most remarkable in Switzerland Italy c. p. 42. says He saw the Originals of Letters writ by several of the English Bishops to Bullinger at Zurich in Queen Elizabeth's time whereby it appears that the antient habits were preserv'd rather in compliance with the Queen than out of any liking they had to them That Bishop Jewel that great Ornament of the English Church in a Letter Feb. 8. 1566 wishes that the Vestments together with all the other Remnants of Popery might be thrown out of their Churches and out of the Minds of the People and laments the Queen's fixedness to them In January that same year Bishop Sands wrote to the same purpose Contenditur de Vestibus papisticis utendis vel non utendis dabit Deus his quoque finem Horn Bishop of Winchester July 16. 1565. regrets the Act concerning Habits and expresses some hopes that it might be repeal'd next Session of Parliament if the Popish Party did not hinder it In many Letters on that subject 't is asserted that both Cranmer and Ridly intended to procure an Act for abolishing the Habits Bishop Grindal in a Letter of Aug. 27. 1566 writes that all the Bishops who had been beyond Sea at their return dealt with the Queen to let the matter of the Habits fall but she continued inflexible and Cox Bishop of Ely one of the most violent Men of the time in one of his Letters bewails the aversion they found in the Parliament to reform those abuses Then by the Testimony of these Great Men who may well be called the Fathers of the Church of England it appears the things in controversy betwixt us are Popish Remnants and that the Popish Party did then hinder the Acts concerning them to be repeal'd And it is very well known that these things have been continued ever since and some Additions made to them by the Influence of the Popish Party who were rampant in the beginning of Charles the First 's Reign and had no little Interest at Court and in obtaining the Act of Uniformity after the Restoration of K. Charles II. This being uncontrovertibly true we have reason to believe that the same Party in concert with the Jacobites are still the Incendiaries and make it their business to add Fuel to our Flames but we have this Happiness that they cannot now as formerly make Tools of the Court and by his Majesty's prudent Conduct the highest places in the Church are many of them fill'd with Persons of a more generous and Christian Temper than to comply with such angry ill-natur'd Men that would again sacrifice the peace of the Nation to their own peevish humours It remains then that the Tools they now work upon are some of the inferiour Clergy and such of the dignified ones as are perhaps discontented that they are not elevated to an higher Dignity from them or the