when Offenders or highly meriting Mat. 23. It was a great sin in the Pharisees to bind Burdens on others they touch'd not themselves 3. Good Salus Populi suprema Lex Plato says a Law is a Manner of Governing by fit Means to the best End No Priviledges that is Privae Leges ought to be granted without this Prospect Knowledge of Sin and Wrath are the Consequents of Divine Law but neither End nor Fruit of them but of the Transgressors 4. Publickly Proclaim'd 5. Firmly ratified by Sanction Laws are made that the Innocent may be safe among the Wicked that the Wicked's Boldness may be bridled the Law is not for a righteous Man 7. There is no kind of Law but what requires Works as its Object the Negative forbids Works the irritating make void Works according to the kind of Works they are distinguish'd Natural of Nations Civil Canonical Priviledges Poenal Customs Counsels Moral Judicial Ceremonial Evangelical and consequently the Law of Faith is not meant the Law requiring Faith for then it would be a Law of Works for Joh. 6.29 To believe is to work the work of God Gal. 5.6 Faith works by Love and the Pharisees even before Conversion as is before prov'd own'd Faith as a most acceptable Work to God so there would neither be fit distinguishing Terms of the opposite Propositions nor any Refutation ot the Apostle's Adversaries by this Sense of it it must therefore either be taken largely for the Doctrine of Faith that is the Gospel the Object of our Faith according to the Cloud of Protestant Commentators or which is Materially the same the Law that is the Object of our Faith and as such he had been before describing the Righteousness we are Sav'd by and Justifi'd by to be a Righteousness Rom. 1.17 3.22 Reveal'd to Faith to be believ'd in now this Righteousness must have a Law which is the Mediatorial Law as the other is the Mediator's Righteousness He was made under the Law to redeem us from under it Gal. 4.5 Mat. 5. He came to fulfill the Law we are Justified by his Obedience to the Law for us So by the Law of Faith is not by the Law as Directing and Commanding our Works but by the Law as believ'd to be fulfill'd by Christ in our room There can be no Pretence or shew of Reason for the other Opinion but on this bottom that by Works and Faith are meant different kind of Works But then why should the general term Comprehending all kind of Works be us'd for one Species Would that be a good Division to say God governs the Earth not by an Animal but by a Man or not by a Spirit but by an Angel and there is no ground in the Context to take the word thus by Synecdoche as shall next be prov'd For there is no Divine Law under which we are but what we may find excluded by the Apostles Arguments 1. The Natural Law and its Works are excluded Rom. 3.9 We have before proved both Jew and Gentile that they are all under sin V. 19. All the World is guilty before God not from insufficiency of the Law for Rom. 2.26 If the Vncircumcision keep the Righteousness of the Law shall not his Vncircumcision be counted for Circumcision for the Law of Nature now is the same with that in Innocence only there is a Change in the Matter Positive Laws do not bind ad semper and the Negative Laws are all the same still the Law says one thing to a married Person and another to an unmarried So tho' the Law command other things to fallen Man than to innocent Man it is not another Natural Law All the Natural Law Tertullian says was broken in Eating the Forbidden Fruit there was Theft yea Sacriledge in stealing God's Proprium there was Murder of himself and his Posterity there was Coveting there was want of Love to God and Obedience too yea Idolatry to an Incarniz'd Devil having more esteeming and adoring Thoughts of the Devil than God So the Matter of the Law is the same and the Measure of it too viz. what Reason observes or may observe to be its Duty from Divine Providence Rom. 2.5 The goodness and forbearance of God leads to Repentance The Author God the Principle Love to God the End God's glory and our good is still the same its Sanction is Perishing and Salvation Rom. 2.12 They that sin without Law perish without Law and if they observe it it shall be Circumcision to them but all are Sinners all have broken it their Conscience accuse them they detain the Truth in Vnrighteousness they did what they knew deserv'd Death Rom. 1.32 2. The Natural Law being excluded all Law is excluded for they are all reduceable to it and consequently it is comprehensive of them Mr. Baxt. Method p. 392. In illo tamen omnes eaedem fuere virtualiter aut eminenter It is the Mother and Root of them all but the further the Branches are removed from the Root the lesser they are and the more invisible and stand at a greater distance from it 1. These are its Primitive Axioms That good is to be chosen and evil to be refused and the greater the good is for Weight or Duration with the greater Desire and Endeavour to be pursued That we are to do that which is becoming us and to do as we would be done by in the like Circumstances The second Order is more determined to wit God is to be worshipped by true loving trusting adoring and Obediential Thoughts that the Innocent is not to be Hurt the Honest Man is to be Befriended the Superior to be Reverenced the Inferior to be Condescended to and the Indigent to be Supplied and many other Laws about Patience Fortitude Sobriety and Temperance The third Order is more particular Vices and Vertues are specified by which Theft Adultery Murder and the like are forbid The fourth Order is less apparent and evident to wit about Revenge Fornication Usury and Self-Murderers in some Cases which gives occasion to Civil and in some sence Canonical Laws also These are two ways reduced to the Natural Law First because both Civil and Religious Society and consequently Government is constituted by this Natural Law Rom. 13.1 There is no Power but of God the Powers that be are ordained of God Their Authority is both established and limited by his and therefore their Laws ought to be subordinate to his which is the second Connexion For Rulers are not a Terror to good Works but to the Evil. Hence a Penal Law obliging to Sin or to suffer is a most unjust thing for it is a Terror to good yet a Conformity to the Laws of God is pretended to by all Law-givers even under Paganism The Moral Law is more properly this Law it self than reductively belonging to it for where Moral and Natural is opposed it is in Sciences not in Laws for what 's Moral as to the Object to wit Praise-worthy or Blame-worthy Vice
Abomination next to the Condemning of Innocent Thirdly No Man has any inherent Righteousness of his own whether Jew or Gentile Fourthly That all Righteousness is by a Law on this Subject he shews there is a Tripple Law The Natural Law and it's Righteousness from Chap. 1.17 to Chap. 2.17 he excludes both the Law and it's Righteousness from any Ability of this kind 2. The Mosaical and Moral Law from that Verse 17. to the 21st of the third Chapter he also excludes that Law and it's Righteousness from being able to justifie Sinners From Verse 21. he begins positively to assert and explain a third Righteousness which he calls the Righteousness of God or Righteousness of Faith and a third Law a Law of Faith All which is Evangelical for in the beginning of the Epistle he had described the Gospel and his own separation to the Office of preaching it and laid down this Doctrine Chap. 1.16 17. That it was the Power of God unto Salvation to every Believer and the Reason it is so is because therein is the Righteousness of God revealed This Righteousness after having excluded the Law with it's Works he most accurately explains from Verse 21. to the Text where he begins a Discourse which is a Conclusion from the former and a Proposition to the latter part of the Context built upon this fifth Axiom That there is a Necessity of the Justification of Sinners being in such a Method that may utterly stop their Mouth from either Glorying or Boasting God has his Glory for his ultimate End in all his Actions but there is a particular Reason that the Glory be entirely his in this great Action for a Sinner is Gods Enemy there is a Controversie between them if the Peace or Reconciliation should be so made up as Man should have any thing to brag of God were so far the Yielder and conquer'd party Man were the Victor and Triumpher in this Affair whatever Glory we ascribe to Man we derogate so much from God This may be clearly illustrated by the Transactions of Peace between Armies Nations Besiegers and Besieged they contend as much for having the Glory of the Peace on their side as for having the Victory of the War on their side And we find the Scripture punctual in ascribing the Glory to God in all the particular parts and points of this great Contrivance 1. Election Eph. 1.4 2. Permission the very letting of Man fall in Sin Strangius says Sin is none of Gods Mediums but the Permission of Sin is Rom. 11.22 Gal. 3.22 3. The Calling of Man Tit. 3.5 4. The sending of the Son into the World 5. The ordaining of such weak Ordinances for means of Conversion and Edification 6. The Calling of Men when they stand at greatest disadvantage for Conversion and so all the other parts of this whole Project and likewise we find the Scripture in nothing more punctual than in describing Man's Guilt and Impotency his Wickedness and his weakness and every thing that may contribute to humble and vilifie him in the sight of God And Satan is in nothing more diligent than to propagate this Lust of Pride it was his own first Sin and the Foundation of his Kingdom and he maintains it as the principal Pillar thereof Carnal Pride is a very strong Hold in his Kingdom it is a very difficult thing to be denied to Credit Honour and Reputation among Men But Spiritual Pride is a more subtil Sin and not easily discernable far less conquerable And if Satan can maintain this one hold we are never like to be sound about this Doctrine of Justification whatever may be our Speculative Opinions in Profession if we retain a Practical Sentiment of a Self-distinguishing Work we run a very great Danger as to our Souls Therefore as ever we would obtain this incomparable Priviledge we would endeavour to walk humbly with God and to get Self-abasing Sentiments of our Selves I come now to the Minor Proposition or second Doctrine which the Text expresses by way of Dialogism What is not and what is the way of Justification that excludes Glorying I shall begin with the Negative part viz. That Glorying is not excluded by the Law of Works The Sence of it is That if a Person can be justified by Works he doth not want Matter of Glorying for God doth not require Humility of a Man beyond his due if his own Works can answer for him before the Tribunal of God he has in Justice viz. Distributive merited his Life and where there is Matter of Merit there is Matter of Glory There are a great many attempts to diminish this Proposition viz. If a Man be justified by Works he has Matter to Glory by the Law of Works 1. Some say it is only the Ceremonial Law and it's Works 2. Others say it is only the Judicial Law and External part of the Moral which made up the Jews Civil Law 3. Others say only the Moral Law is excluded so far as obeyed without Grace 4. Others say it 's the Mosaical Law in the Pharisaical sense thereof 5. Others say 'T is the Law as requiring Perfection 6. Others as Meriting But 7. It has been the most Universal Sentiment among Protestants that all Law is excluded and all Inherent Works in sinful Men as Righteousness or being conformed to that Law It is more easie to fix upon this Question Whether or not the Evangelical Law and it's Works be excluded yea or not For though all these six Ways differ in what Law is excluded yet they generally agree that the Evangelical Law with it's Evangelical Obedience are not here excluded but put in opposition to the former and comprehended under this Notion of the Law of Faith The first thing Needfull is to enquire into the Nature of this Evangelical Law which is the Influence of the Gospel upon the Law The Moral Law and the Gospel are the two Ingredients whereof our Christian Religion is Constituted and being thus Compounded have an Influence one upon another and the Law by reason of the New Modes and Relations it receives from this blessed Yoak-fellow in the Covenant of Grace is called a New Law and a New Commandment and an easie Yoak and light Burden The New Constitution of the Law that we are under is one of the blessed Fruits of Christ's Death and this makes the Preaching of the Law Gospel to us for the Gospel strictly taken Rom. 1. to the 17. v. and Rom. 3. from the 21. to the 26. v. is a Narrative of Christ his Nature Person Offices States with the blessed Fruits thereof to us and the Manner of Application to us by the Power of the Holy Sprit But in particular the Moral Law is by the Gospel a New Law that is a Renewed Law after Man's Fall Jure the Law was quite Obliterated but he who is the Light that enlightens every one that comes into the World has re-wrote some Fundamental Parts of this Law in their Consciences
is to represent a Cure We only see the Malignity of the Distemper by the Strength and Power of the Medicine the first Edition of the Natural Law was to direct to Duty and to prevent sinning but the principal end of this Edition is to make Trangressors sensible of the Number and Aggravations of their Sin and so to be a Schoolmaster to bring to Christ 2. That Law is excluded that worketh Wrath Rom. 4.15 For the same Law cannot bring a Man both under the Curse and under a Blessing both to be a Ministration of Death and Life the same cannot be both matter of Justification and Condemnation and there is no Law renders a Man liable to Wrath as this doth for being Guilty Wrath is unavoidable by it 3. The particular Vices nominate from the 9th verse to the 19th which hinders Men from being justified by this Law discovers this Law to be Moral whereof they are Transgressors The Fear of God that comprehends inward spiritual Worship not following the Way of Peace that shews want of Love to their Neighbour and what can be more Spiritual than Vnderstanding of God and Seeking of God and in the second Chapter Theft Murther and Sacriledge and want of Heart Circumcision are mentioned as Reasons why they could not be justified by the Law 4. That Law and its Works are excluded which is of universal Extension Chap. 3. 19. That all the World may become Guilty before God but that 's only the Moral which is but circumstantially distinct from the Natural 5. All Works that we have done are excluded Titus 3. Not by Works of Righteousness which we have done but all own Moral Obedience to be our Works 4. The Mosaical Law is excluded for farther Explication of this we may find it meet with a double Acceptation as it is a Politick or Spiritual concerning the Soul or Civil a Type or Antitype for their whole State was significant for the former as it was their Common-wealth Law it did comprehend Ceremonies the Judicial Law and the External part of the Moral this made up their Civil Constitution and its faults were punishable by the Magistrate It had only Temporal Promises and Penalties and it was twofold either most severe as the Common Law threatning Death for Non-performance to a Tittle and this did 1. Represent the Moral Law or 2. It was remedial for smaller faults for Types must not be enlarged to have overthrown the Common-Wealth and therefore there were no Sacrifices for Murther and Adultery and the like Lev. 20. But 2. There was a Chancery or a Remedying Law to prevent these Penalties in many Cases Acts 13.39 If there had been in all Cases the Order of the Common-wealth had been turn'd into Confusion This we may see in Heb. 7.8 9 10 Chap. This was the Ceremonial Law Levit. 15. A Man for burying the Dead was liable to perpetuâ—l Exile which was a necessary Moral Duty had it not been for this Relief Now all grant this Law literally taken is excluded from our Justification and some lay the stress meerly here viz. in the Insufficiency of the Law as that which God never intended to justifie any Man as to Aeternal concerns by but we see on the contrary it was the insufficiency of the Obedience that did prevent it not the Law it self 2. The Mosaical Law is to be taken Spiritually and this in Correspondence to the Type must be twofold also Either as a most severe Law requiring Perfect Personal and Perpetual Obedience in Thought Word and Deed and Threatning Death for every offence I have proved already this Law is excluded or 2. As a Remedy for all Transgressions and Failures against that exact Law for the Parallel of a Remedy as to some offences Acts 13.39 is excepted and this was the Law as fulfilled by Christ Jesus for us for he it was and his Obedience who was obedient to the Death that was represented by all these Ceremonies that were Tipifying Remedies under the Law he was the City of Refuge he was the Propitiating Sacrifice his Blood sprinkles both Book and People and only Purifies as to Conscience and this is the Gospel or Law of Faith by which we are justified and by which our Mouth is stopt as to all boasting we being no ways fulfillers of it For he alone did tread the Wine-press of the Fathers Wrath of all the People there was none with him he built the House and he ought to bear the Glory by one Sacrifice he hath for ever perfected them that are Sanctified They who plead for a Remedying Law to be obey'd by us ought to find Scriptures interpreting the Typical Remedying Law to represent it but they all Terminate and End in Christ and therefore the Law is remedial as satisfi'd or obey'd by him the Mediatorial Law is the Remedying Law Indeed the Quietists Interpret a Broken Heart and Contrite Spirit to be typifi'd by the Sacrifices because called Sacrifices that God will not despise but then they deny Christs Sacrifice for the Type must Point at one thing else it would be of an uncertain sound other things are by Allusion but nothing is more plain in all the Scripture than that he is the Antitype of all that Remedying Law The Armin. System by Limbourgh says The Dedication of our selves to God as living Sacrifices Rom. 12.1 Or Alms and Charity were represented by the Thanksgiving Offerings not the expiatory Sacrifices we must be Priests in a justifi'd State a fellow of the High-Priests before we can offer acceptably This was the Gospel and Law of Faith and differ'd from ours only as symbols from express Words a gradual difference in Clearness and Obscurity and rendred the promis'd Seed of the Woman bruis'd after the manner of an Expiatory Sacrifice the Object of the Old Testament Faith 5. The Evangelical Law and its Works are here comprehended under the Law of Works for the Distinction lies more in the Manner of Obedience and Acceptance of the Works than in the Preceptive or Sanctive Nature of the Law 1. The Works of all Men are excluded by the deeds of the Law there shall no Flesh be justified Rom. 3.20 The Expression seems to be borrowed from the 143d. Psalm v. 2. Enter not into Judgment with thy Servant for in thy sight shall no Man living be justified They to whom Paul writes were Saints Rom. 1.7 Beloved of God called to be Saints Galat. 1.2 4. They were the Churches of Galatia in whose State Paul enrolls himself Ver. 4. Who gave himself for our Sins Abram is brought in here as an Example having his Works excluded from giving any Right to Justification and David who was a Man according to Gods own Heart is brought in as another Instance expecting Gods imputing Righteousness without Works And indeed the Apostles Arguments for Justification without Works would be of small Strength against any Man except Believers in Christ Galat. 2.21 If Righteousness câ—me by the Law then is Christ dead
bear both the Place of a Sentence and a Condition which is needfull to reconcile these two Opinions R. 1. By Condition they mean not a Condition properly in a Law or a foederal Sence as we use the Word in Bargains between Man and Man for the Civilians inform me these three Properties make a Condition 1. Potestative that it be in the Parties Power to perform 2. Casualty in it self and to the other Party uncertain 3. Causal in that it bear a Valuable Consideration The Law will not suffer a Man to injure himself so far or another to deceive him as to get a Title to an Estate of two or three hundred Pounds per Ann. for an hundred Guineas But the Apol. informs us that This Condion is neither in our Power 2. Nor Uncertain 3. Nor Meritorious therefore not a Condition properly Nay further tho' the Gospel be a Law and this Law is the Condition of the Covenant yet it is not a Legal Condition Therefore it must be in a Physical or Logical Sence if not in a Law Sence and a Necessary Connection is enough for the one viz. Logical as if a Man be Reasonable he is capable of Learning and if capable of Learning he is reasonable and Priority enough for the other as that Wood must be laid to the Fire before it can be burnt And this Opinion is very agreeable with Condition in this Sence for there is not only a Necessary Connexion between Faith Repentance and Justification but there is a Priority the Covenant of Grace partakes more of Orderliness it is Order'd in all things than of Conditionalness for the Foundation is before the Relation the Sign before the Signification the Gift of Faith and Repentance is before its Connotation of our Pardon or being receiv'd into Favour Nay further there is not only the Gift of Faith but the exercise of this Grace as mix'd with our Faculties and become a Duty in order of Nature antecedent to this Connotation or Signification of our being now brought under Divine Favour because the way of Communicating this Gift is by Calling speaking immediately to the Soul and representing spiritual Ideas making us behold as in a Glass the glorious Image of the Lord discovering unseen and hoped for things as before and after both is further explained and the Gift cannot be without this exercise by which God and the Soul unite and mutually apprehend one another In short thus That this Gift may not only be long unperceiv'd by the Receiver but that it cannot Signifie untill in Exercise tho' as a Gift it doth signifie There is but one thing more that Justification and Glory are suspended upon these Duties of Faith and Repentance R. Either by Suspension he means no more but Necessary Consequential so we Agree and I do not find his Arguments will prove more For a Testament is fully as proper a Title that gives Name to the whole Bible as Covenant or Bargain and Civilians say the If used in Testaments which is so frequent in Scriptures is a demonstrative If that doth not Suspend but Design the thing Promised and some certain Time or Manner of Conveyance If he understand it a Legal Suspension it 's the same with a Legal Condition which he has deny'd before for Conditio est dispositionis suspensio ex eventu incerto ei opposito and has an Obliging Influence on the Promiser and Conferrs a Title of Right to the Benefit promised I might Conclude this with some Testimonies out of the Fathers but though I find Phrases to answer my Purpose I find the Style sometimes Loose and Oratorical and sometimes they Design another thing which I wish a late Author had minded who Attempts to prove the New Law out of the Fathers when Daille who was better acquainted with them says It 's in vain to make them Judges in many of the Controversies between us and the Papists and yet this Authour would bring them to Prove a more Nice Point become a very late Question In what sense the Law is New thoro the Gospel or the Gospel may be call'd a Law I shall only instance his first Citation out of Justin Martyr p. 228. c. and I am willing to be judged by any of the Subscribers that will take the Pains to read it if Justin intends any thng more than the recommending the Christian Constitution and proving it preferable to the Mosaical For he says This New Law is Posterior to Moses his Law but the Apologist's New Law has been ever since the Fall of Adam He says this New Law is Christ and his Testament Any may see he took Law in no strict Sense when he calls Christ and his Testament a Law he calls it a Testament Eight times in that Page and nigh Seventy times in that Dialogue and seldom I think not above Four times a Law without the Explicatory word Testament added yet I think this Opinion will help to wrest the Fathers out of the Papists Hands The Fathers use the Words Justifie and Sanctifie often promiscuously for making Just and Holy The common Answer by Protestants is the Fathers use the Word according to its Grammatical Signification not Forensical Use To which the Papists answer Then they were not acquainted with that sense This affords another for we may say to Sanctifie is to Justifie in the same Sense that Christ says This Bread is my Body that is a Sign of it And so we may understand the Fathers Est or Is Metonymically for est Signum and we may find enough among their Writings to shew that all the Parts and Degrees of Sanctification are Signs of Justification which doth sufficiently shew that tho' this Phrase is New that the Gift of the Holy Spirit in order to our Sanctification stands in the room and place of a Justificatory Sentence yet the Sense is not for it is the Sign yea the spiritual Initiating Sign of our being in Covenant with God This is the Covenant I will make with them I will pour out my Spirit on them Being in Covenant is a Relative Blessing as well as Justification and they are inseparable Now says the Lord my giving my Spirit imports this I take thee to be one of my People I avouch thee this Day to be mine The Prince's Proclamation of Pardon to a Rebel or the Judges Justificatory Sentence of a Person suspected accused imprison'd is the first Authoritative Signification of the Governments Favour So what is the first Sign of Divine Favour must stand in the place of a Justifying or Pardoning Sentence but these absolute Blessings that are proper to the Elect of Faith and Repentance are the first Intimations of Divine Governments receiving us into Favour therefore the Gift of them is the Absolving Sentence A third Propos'd Head was the Time of our Justification which being meant of the first Act necessarily follows from the former Proposition to be neither later nor sooner than the first Moment of our Conversion
of Days Hours and Minutes The second Difference is between the Eternal Duration of God and that Duration of Creatures Psal 102.27 They shall be chang'd but thou art the same and thy Years shall have no End The one is founded in an Immutability the other in Change the Infinite God possesses his whole Essence Independently and most perfectly at once in Time there is Past Present and Future the Eflux of a â—â—ing from Past to Future by the present Minute this agrees not to Him whose Nature is I am that is In me nothing â—ast in me nothing Future This alone has great Matter of Humiliation in it of what awe would the Presence of a Sâ—ge Angel that hath been since the Creation to such a Mushroom as Man a new start-up in the World we suffer not Children to speak in the Presence of Men how much more should mans Mouth be stopp'd before the Ancient of days who has ten thousand Times ten thousand ministring before him and charges the Angels with Folly 5. Man is an Imaginary Being rather the Picture of Being than the Reality and this is not a Dignity that every Creature attains to be called the Image of God they are his Workmanship Rom. 1.20 And so are proofs of an Eternal Powerful and Wise Being and they bear some Prints of his Being upon them 2 Tim. 2.13 He cannot deny himself neither in Word nor in Deed he cannot do any thing but what must represent him to be such as he is though there are vastly different Degrees of Representation The Common Properties of Creatures seems to be their Reality Durability Goodness and Beauty but Man alone of all Earthly Creatures bears the Name of an Image because there is some Representation of all the Divine Attributes in him either Subjectively as Spirituality Knowledge Reason Will or Objectively as he possesses an Idea of the Divine Nature impressed upon him 2 Cor. 3.18 We all with open face behold as in a Glass the Glory of the Lord and are changed into the same Image Or Qualitively as Righteousness and Holiness Or Reflexively and thus the incommunicable Attributes of Soveraignty Independency and Alsufficiency are represented by our Submission Emptiness and Dependency as the Wax doth represent the Seal Or Deputatively as he is Governour of the World but as this is Mans Dignity above other Creatures to be Gods Image so it is the most excellent thing in it self and this is our great Misery the loss of this Image and our Happiness lies in its Restauration so that Man at his best who is the best of the Creatures is but an Image 6. A meer Passiveness Matter is a very Passive Object to work upon yet through the Disposition of its parts hardness or softness it is fitter for one thing than another and more easily wrought into that frame but nothing is equally Passive for all equally fit to be an Angel and an Atom of Dust and whatever Activity the Creatures may now have on one another yet with respect to God they are Passive Beings 7. Creatures are more Nothing than Being Isa 40.17 We are Nothing and less than Nothing Nothing Naturally and less than Nothing by Debt and Obligation owing the Being we have received but far more by our Guilt and Transgression for what is worse than Nothing is less than Nothing A Marble Statue formed in the likeness of a Man is more a Stone than Man because the one by Art the other by Nature So Man by Nature he is nothing by Divine Art he is God's Image We are from Nothing that is our Original for we are brought into being by the Force and Violence of Omnipotent Power If God's proper Name is Jehovah Psal 83.18 and of him only can it be said Exod. 3.14 I am or He is then properly is it said of the Creatures They are not Philosophers usually grant that Ens or Being is not a Genus Vnivocum when applyed to God and Creatures there is no Generical Oneness in it When we say the Creature is Being and God is Being it is not one thing that is meant by that word Being for the one really is the other is the Image as we call the Picture of a Man a Man Since any one of these affords matter of Humiliation how much more all being put together and if they afford matter of Humiliation for Angels how much more matter of Humiliation for Man If an Angel be but a Contingent Dependent Unprofitable Temporary Passive Imaginary Being a Being more Nothing than Being in Comparison of God how little a thing must Man be in Comparison of him and how much less a sinfull Man I come to the second Topick of Arguments for the Proof of this Doctrine That Man has nothing to Glory in before God which is the Form he was made in and by which he Excells other Earthly Creatures and is called an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lord of his own Actions a Self-powered Creature or as Cicero says a Power of Living as he will The Common Title for it is Free-will Liberum Arbitrium which Amyrald thinks to be better Translated a Free Judgment The Apostle Paul calls it the Prevailing Will Rom. 7.17 If I do that I would not it is not I but Sin I as that which denominates the Man I shall insist the more largely on this because it is that which the most part of the World are proud of The former Argument is more commonly granted That Man cannot be Proud of his Being but therein still he would be Equal to the Angels and the Pride of Man can hardly aspire higher but for this Argument that Man has no Matter of glorying from his Free Will is not so easily Complyed with whether we View Men's Professions or their Practices 1. The Pagans they commonly ascribed all Virtue all their Heroick Actions and the Praise of 'em to themselves Upon this Account Cicero De Natura Deorum says We may thank God for Riches or Fortune but not for Virtue that is our own for that we are Praised for the want of that we are blamed We may glory of our Virtue which we could not do if it were God's Gift Seneca Ep. 53. A wise Man in some things is preferable to God for the one is Wise by the Benefit of Nature the other by the Benefit of Virtue Ep. 20. Be Content with thy self and the Goods brought forth by and of thy self so thy Happiness shall be next to Gods 2. The Jews especially the Pharisees on this account were as Proud as the others for they reckoned the External Administration of the Law which gâ—ve Occasion to their Merit by Free-Will to be the principal difference between them and the Pagans Maimonides says this is one of their Fundamentals That they had such a perfect Free Will and sufficient Power for Virtue and Goodness that they only needed the Law to exercise their Power about Rab. Gaon Saadia says 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 All things are in
the Power of Heaven except the Fear of Heaven that is Religion There is a difficulty of reconciling their Opinions about this Point because they also owned a Fate which they call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Josephus who was one of them says lib. 2. chap. 7. that they attributed all things to God and Fate but it is no wonder for wherever Error is there is Contradiction for every Man holds some Truth and whatever Error he holds is repugnant to the Truth he holds but Camero thus explains their Sense from Josephus his own words That by Faith is meant God's Providential Help but most is to be placed in Man and lib. 18. chap. 2. We are not to separate Man's Will from enclining Fate so that the Sense of it is Providence gives Occasion to Work but the Work it self is wholly Man's own 3. The Pelagians are not inferiour in this Pride to any of the former who confine all God's Grace to Man in giving of this Noble and Natural Endowment of Free-Will by which a Man is able to do all good Commanded They say none can give a Man spiritual Riches but himself for these he is justly Praised and jure Preferred to others for these can have no Being but in himself and from himself hence he taught this Form of Prayer Lord behold the Purity of my Lips by which I Pray to thee and the Innocency of my Hands which I stretch forth before thee 4. The Papists especially Jesuites and Molinists tho' others seem to diminish the Power of Free-Will when they write on that Head yet when they come to the Point of Merit they again extoll it Bel de Just lib. 5. chap. 3. because it is more honourable to obtain a thing by Merit than by Grace alone therefore that God might Honour his Children he has granted that they might prepare Eternal Life to themselves by their Merits and more proudly Ruard in Top. Art Lov. God forbid that the Righteous should expect Eternal Life as a Poor Man doth an Alms since it is more glorious for them as Victors and Triumphants to possess it as the Crown and Palm due to their Sâ—eats and Labours and their Common Doctrine is that by the strength of Nature preparing our selves we Merit ex Congruo special Grace and afterwards being made just by it we can so perfectly fulfill the Law that we Merit Heaven ex Condigno and why may not a Workman glory in his Work 5. Socinians and Arminians who hold the Freedom of the Will inconsistent with any Necessity and that it is out of the Power of God effectually to Call a Sinner when he will or according to the Terms in Dispute Grace is always resistable but the Will of Man unconquerable 6. We find many others and more ancient too much extolling Man on this account as Prudentius in his Poems on that Subject Insubjecte potens rerum arbiter arbiter idem judex Mentis propriae Powerfull being subject to none Lord of all things Lord also and Judge of thy own Mind And elsewhere He that made thee Lord of all things would he not make thy self free He that made thee King of the World would he not make thee King of thy self would he so Curtail thine Honour and Matter of glorying Besides the common Definition of it signifies no less that supposing all things in act that are fit or have Power to move or encline it it may Act or not Act or act the contrary as it will Neither God nor Angels Men or Devils have Poweâ— certainly to determine it 7. They who have their Minds better instructed yet have Practical Sentiments secretly latent in their Minds of this kind which we may learn from our Observation of our selves As 1. When Men adventure on sin because they think they can make amends by Repentance 2. When Peâ—sons delay Repentance upon this ground that they can do it afterwards 3. When Persons stifle Convictions and quench the Spirit because they think they can enjoy it again when they will 4. When Persons do not Pray from this latent Error that they have a Power to Accomplish their Designs themselves 5. When men Neglect the outward Ordinances and Means of Salvation which God has appointed not only as Means between Us and the End but as Means between our Can and our Cannot because we cannot do any thing of the Essentials of Salvation Meriting Pardon Enlightning the Understanding or Sanctifying our Wills God has prescribed these Means that we can do and has Promised to Perform that which we cannot Phil. 3. Work in and about your own Salvation with fear and trembling for he worketh in you to will and to do Now that which many Neglect the Means for is because they think they can go about the thing it self The Security that destroys the most of perishing Souls is founded on this corrupt Root that we have a Power in a very short time to do all the Business of our Salvation Were it not for this Sinners Despairing wholly in themselves wou'd be rolling themselves in the Dust and prostrating themselves before a Father of Mercies and God of Grace and constantly Watching for the Angels troubling of the Waters they would be daily waiting at Wisdoms Gates for the Spirit promised to Attendants upon appointed Means In opposition to all this I shall lay down these Eight Propositions with their several Confirmations to prove that this Noble Principle that God hath endowed Man with though it hath exalted him above Brutes it affords him no ground of Pride or glorying before God four are Positive and four Negative 1. Free-Will is a part of that Excellency by which Man is the Image of God All in Man by which he excells meer Animals he therein is God's Image This is a great Dignity to be in the Image of God but this should humble Man before God because he is but an Image tho' in respect of inferiour Creatures they being only a Vestigium or a Print of some one perfection as the Print of a Man's Foot represents but one part of him an Image represents the whole or most principal Parts Free-will is founded in Wisdom and Power and in these Man is God's Image but this Excellency affords no Matter of glorying 1. From the Scriptures own Expression Psalm 39.6 there is a Reason given why Man in his best Estate that is in the Purity of his Nature in the unfaded and unstained flower of all his Senses and spiritual Faculties is but Vanity because every Man walks in a Vain shew so we Translate it but the Original is Bezalim the same Word which in Gen. 1. is used for the Image of God Man is Vanity because at best but an Image Our greatest Perfections by Nature did not free us from Defectibility 2. Indifferency doth not represent the Will of God as terminate upon himself but as terminate upon the Creatures to him it was indifferent whether they should be or not
the Law of Nature is what a reasonable Nature observes to be due from that Relation that is between Men and God or Men and Men Mutatâ Naturâ mutatur Lex Naturae To Love our Enemies to be Charitable to the Poor to Repent of our Offences had been Paradoxical Duties to a sinless Man but now they are plain Duties of the Law of Nature 10. From these very Circumstances the Gospel brings a greater clearness and particularness to the Duties of the Law than the Law it self since the Fall The Blessed Trinity that great Mystery which is the adequate Object of our Worship is more manifested by the Gospel than ever the Law could have done the Example of Christ fulfilling all the Law before the Eyes of Men has not only cast an Honour but a lustre upon it as it never had before the formal Reasons of Duties were never so discovered as they are by the Gospel besides those Comments that in the Gospel he and his Apostles have made of it 11. The Gospel has yet a greater Influence upon the Law in removing of it's rigorous way of exacting Obedience of Fallen Man it has a Coercive Irritating and Condemning Power upon them First A Coercive because by the Terror of its Threatnings it Commands what Man abhorrs and when the poor Sinner obeys he doth it as a Brute for fear of blows 1 Tim. 1.9 The Law is not made for a righteous man but for the lawless and disobedient c. The Quietists say that properly the Name of a Law arises from the Contention and War between Man's Inclinations and Duties but when the Law is Writ in our Minds and becomes our Delight it is a Gospel not a Law however when the Gospel brings in Light and Strength it becomes a very easie Yoke The Law of the Spirit encreases it's strength and the Law of the Members decay and dye We obey by a kind of perswasion God's Efficacy is so gentle upon the Soul Galat. 5.8 This perswasion cometh not of him that calleth you Secondly It has an irritative or Pollutive Power It 's an Old Proverb Nitimur in vetitum Our desire encreases by being forbid Sins taking occasion by the Commandment wrought in me all manner of Concupiscence for without the Law sin was dead Some think that Swearing Prophaning the Name of God and Adultery arises chiefly from this Natural Contradiction in us to the Nature of God if Persons thought them no Sins they would never so much delight in them Thirdly It has a Condemning Power 2 Cor. 3.9 it 's called a killing Letter The Gospel is a City of Refuge There is no Condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus who has satisfied the Law for all interested in him This is a Newness altering the Law from what it was to Man sinful not sinless 12. The Law which of it self is the Spring of Terrors for the strength of Sin is the Law becomes a Handmaid to Consolation in and thrô the Gospel partly by its discovering to us that Christ has fulfilled the Law for us this is the Marrow of the Gospel and by it the Law of Works is turned into a Law of Faith Partly as it is an instrument to interest us into the Gospel partly as the Law fulfill'd or satisfy'd by Christ is seen by Faith By the Law we have the Knowledge of Sin James 1.24 That 's a Glass to see our selves in 2 Cor. 3.18 The Gospel is a Glass to see Christ in the more vile and horrible the Looks of the one appears the more aimiable appears the other The Law is a Judge Rom. 7.9 to kill the Man by Sentence and to revive Sin Man by Nature and Satan's deceitfulness is very secure and a great Self-flatterer but if the Spirit of the Gospel enliven the Law it makes a Man conclude all the Threatnings on himself and bring him under a Spirit of Bondage He cries I am accursed I possess the Sins of my Youth my Sin is ever before me I am undone So the Gospel Spirit takes the killing Letter of the Law and rouses him out of his Lethargy it makes a Man weary and heavy laden it makes People a People prepared for the Lord for then he begins to see what he thought Righteousness Guilt and what he thought Gain Loss 13. The Gospel Spirit makes a Bridle of the Law to restrain Sin The Wicked cry Let us cast off these Cords from our Neck but when the Spirit comes a little Child may lead them By this Law restraining Grace Works Men are perswaded to forbear Evil by the Lords Terrors what would become of either the Gospel or the Church if it were not for this Use of the Law Farther the Law is a Rule for directing Evangelized persons how to live and it is a Pattern from which the Spirit transcribes a Copy into the Heart of Man It is a Mean of Conversion The Law of the Lord is perfect converting the Soul The Gospel is much honoured when the Saints walk orderly according to this Rule The Second Enquiry is about their Opinion whom the Apostle here opposes viz. What a Christianiz'd Pharisee is For Act. 15.5 such they were I do not say they were the only but the principal party he opposes how far their Faith and Profession reach'd and wherein that Error did consist is next to be considered We find they were of two Kinds Some that did oppose the Mosaical Law to the Gospel as the Unbelieving Pharisees Or the Natural Law as the Pagan Philosophers The one did overvalue Ceremony the other Morality We find the Apostle often disputing against both against the former Rom. 9.3 Philip. 3.1 Gal. 3.5 against the latter 1 Cor. 1.23 Coloss 2. Acts 17.19 The former Party did compose the Law with the Gospel Acts 15.5 Certain of the Pharisees who believed said it was needfull to Circumcise 'em Gal. 2.21 If righteousness be by the Law Christ dyed in vain this Argument would have been of little strength against the Pharisees who crucifi'd him and thought he dy'd a Malefactor but of great Influence against them who mixed Moses and Christ Law and Gospel and expected Salvation from their mutual Concurse The latter denyed the reality of Jesus his Satisfaction and Righteousness but these did deny the Fulness of it they would eak or add to it and except it were the Church of Thessalonica we find by Paul's Epistles that there was not any Church but what was molested and partly corrupted by this Error In the Epistles to Corinth the Apostle calls them false Apostles deceitful Workers transforming themselves into the Apostles of Christ 2 Cor. 11.13 In the Epistle to the Galat. he calls it another Gospel by which they were Bewitched We find the Church of Ephesus is Forewarned of such Acts 20.30 And in the Book of the Revelation they are Charged of Falling from their First Love yet it is Doubtful whether that came by this Error or not For Christ Appoves of her Orthodoxy
Prayers are only heard in an acceptable time but Repentance at all times And on Psal 37.3 Trust in the Lord and do good it 's said There is no good in this World but Repentance Resset Cochme contains twenty two penitential Canons and concludes Let every one search himself every day that if he hath offended he may speedily repent and implore Gods Mercy with a contrite Heart 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And Maimonides has wrote a Book of Repentance There are two Objections lye against the Doctrine of the Pharisies being of so comprehensive and Spiritual a Nature 1. Christs Sermons about them Mat. 5. 23. 2. Their own Writings as Maimonides of the Mishnah He that observes any one Precept it shall be well with him and his Days shall be Prolonged and he shall Possess the Earth That is saith Maimon by the Addition of this Work to his other Works his good Works over-weigh his evil and his Merits Proponderate his Demerits M. Smith in his Select Discourses observes these Defects in their Righteousness and their Notion of it 1. That the Law was meerly a Dead Letter without ' em 2. Their Free-will was a Self-sufficiency within 'em to be a Foundation of Merit 3. They might pick out particular Precepts for their Observation with Neglect of the others For tho' they have an Axiom that it is not Lawfull to Skip over Precepts yet they expounded it thus A Man is not to leave the Observation of one Precept to go and observe another yet they have another Canon Mizbatorah Mirba Hajim He that Multiplies the Law multiplies Life These things seem to Derogate from the Jewish Notion of their Works rendring it Partial External Constrained and Artificial but these following Considerations may help to reconcile the former Position with the Objections 1. Christ asserts of 'em Mat. 23. That their Opinion was better than their Practice Ver. 4. They bind heavy Burdens on Mens shoulders but they won't move 'em with one of their Fingers And on the 3d Ver. he seems to allow of their Doctrine What they bid you Observe that Observe and do but do not ye after their Works 2. They reckoned Sincerity the Measure of the Law or acceptable without Perfection therefore Christ tells the Young Man If thou wilt be Perfect one Perfectly Righteous They made a great Difference between Perfection and Sincerity these they called Beninim Middle-way Men that had Sincerity and should go to Eternal Life either by the Preponderation of their good Works or Repentance of their Evil hence Obadias de Bartanora says Whosoever shall Perform any one of the 613 Precepts of the Law without any worldly respect for Love of the Precept behold this man shall Merit thereby Everlasting Life And R. Minach Kekannat Know that the Life of Man in the Precepts is according to his Intention He who obeys the Commands otherwise than for themselves shall have no Reward but in this Life So they did not lay the weight of Imperfect Obedience on particular partial Obedience but on Sincerity More Proof of it may be seen before on the 5th Particular and in Maimonides his Explication of the Objection For 1. He says only Blessed in the Earth 2. Others must be added 3. Observ'd from Sincerity 3. The Jews make a great distinction between what the Law was in their time and what it should be in the days of the Messiah Rabbi Johannim who lived about Titus his time cited by the Midrash Shir Hashirim says The Week in which the Son of David shall come the Law shall return to his Newness and it shall be renewed to Israel as it is said in Jeremiah 31.31 A Law that they should not break because written in their Hearts Midrash Kohlet 11.8 Every Law which Man learns in this Life is Vanity except the Messias his Law And 2.1 The Reason is rendred Because men in this Age Learn and Forget in the other it shall be wrote in their Hearts And so their Gloss on Cant. 1.1 Let him kiss me with the kisses of his Mouth that is Write it in my Heart that I may never forget Teach me Ore proprio with his own Mouth Moses had a Stammering Tongue and Isaiah polluted Lips but the Messias is the Vnspotted Mouth of God his Kissing is the immediate Touching of our Heart as the Loadstone the Needle and our Kissing him is our Turning to him complying with his Voice Psal 2. Kiss ye the Son Aben Ezra well observes That Kissing there is oppos'd to Rebellion and Disobedience in the ver 1 2. he illustrates it with this Simile A King sent to destroy a City that rebell'd his Son intercedes and reconciles them the Citizens come with Submission and Gratitude to the King Go says the King Thank my Son that is says the Author Kiss him And on Cant. 8.1 O that thou wert as my Brother viz. Incarnate Cloath'd with Humanity that suck'd the Breasts of my Mother that is Bring forth the Law unto a nourishing Life and Vigour when I should find thee without see thee thus manifested in External Humanity and Internal Power I would kiss thee that is obey gratefully See more of this on ver 1. I conclude from it if they did expect such a spiritualiz'd Law in the days of the Messias they who had by the Power of his Spirit been made willing to embrace his Law would they disown such a Truth The Apostle says not Gal. 3.2 Receiv'd ye the Spirit by the Works of the Law or by the hearing of Faith 2 Cor. 11.4 If ye receive another Spirit or hear another Gospel So whatever constraint the Unbelieving Jews obey'd from the Believing obey'd from the Spirit nay even the Unbelievers own'd Divine Assistance Luk. 18.11 12. I thank thee c. Aug. He proudly said He was Righteous tho' he own'd God the giver of it Hear this O ye that are worse than Pharisees who say God made you Men but you your selves Righteous Greg. He rightly thank'd God for the good he had from him Stella there is a Triple Pride The first denies Gods Gift The second owns him but thorough Merit The third as this Pharisee glories in it He disputes against the abuse of the Law perform'd and obey'd by that Spirit they had receiv'd The Law is good if a Man use it lawfully So there is a great difference both between the Persons and the State of the Question from that in Math. 5. they were meer Pharisees here Christians too 2. The Question was about the Perfection and Extent of the Law here it is about its use and the Merit or Worth of its Obedience supposing the other Error rectifi'd which was more Practical than Speculative for according to Mat. 5.23 that Sacrifice will not be acceptable when we are at Enmity with our Brothers on Lev. 5.5 They say Sacrifice will not expiate without Confession and Repentance and according to ver 28. the Talm. says He that looks on a Woman with Intention is 〈◊〉
undertake all these Tribulations on this Condition that in my day thou shalt raise the Dead even all who have died from the first Adam until now and all those that shall be Created and shall save them c. The Conclusion I draw from this large Narrative is That no part of Evangelical Obedience is here wanting Faith and Repentance the influence of the Spirit Jesus a Lawgiver and Principal Meriter Sincerity an acceptable Measure c. And suppose them not all of a Mind yet Charity will ever make us conclude the Believers to be of the best Mind among them And the Error here oppos'd in this Church at Rome by the Apostle is the same that now in the Church of Rome is oppos'd by the Protestants 2 Thes 2.7 This was that wherein the Mystery of Iniquity did already Work the Doctrine of Merit was already begun and no other Error can be found to have such a fair appearance when the Apostle wrote to the Thessalonians the Church at Thessalonica was free of the Error and she of all the Churches only was and may be therefore the Mystery of it was reveal'd to them Mr. Squire of Shore-ditch says on this Epistle to the Thessalonians That the placing of Faith between Mercy and Merits is like the Infant between the two Mothers if divided it must be destroyed It s like the Pale Horse Death sits on it and Hell follows it is a damnable Assertion without peradventure and a Bellarmine after his long Dispute for Merits concludes that it is most safe to trust in Mercy alone And what way Rome had her first beginning by that way she is most likely to attempt her Restauration and by opposing Merit our first Reformation began which has this for its Glory it s a Restauration of Christianity to its Primitive Purity and while we preserve this Doctrine she will never corrupt or stain our Souls however she may prevail to oppress our Bodies But it is to be lamented that so many bearing the Name of Protestants are so deeply tinctur'd with this Doctrine of Opera Tincta Works Meriting because tinctur'd with Christs Merits The Third Enquiry shall be a more close Examination of the Extensiveness and Comprehensiveness of this Law of Wâ—rks that is excluded from being the Rule or Law of our Justification Because boasting would not be excluded from us by it if justified by it and on the most sincere Scrutiny I can make I find all Laws and all Works as perform'd by us are excluded the Arguments for Proof of it I shall reduce to these five Heads 1. The Nature of a Law in general is excluded 2. The Natural Law is 3. The Moral Law is 4. The Mosaical Law is And 5. The Evangelical and our Evangelical Obedience to it is excluded 1. The Nature of a Law in General is for every Law is a Law of Works and a Law of Works is excluded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Law signifies either in general Doctrine as Isa 2.3 Out of Zion shall go forth the Law and the Word of the Lord from Jerusalem Joh. 10.34 Is it not written in your Law I said ye are Gods That is no Precept See Joh. 15.25 Gal. 4.21 Or it is taken properly and then it signifies a Doctrine of Works hence Works and Law are reciprocal without Law Rom. 3.21 is the same with 4.6 without Works We are justified not only without the Law of Works but by a Righteousness without the Law Gal. 3.21 If there had been a Law given which could have given Life verily Righteousness should have been by the Law Works is no Distinctive Addition as Dr. Tuck of Cambtidge says but Explicative Rom. 2.13 The doers of the Law shall be justifi'd to do the Law and Works are the same in the Apostles style they are of so nigh kindred he adds it to tell us what he means by Righteousness of the Law viz. Works Commanded by and Conform to the Law the whole Constituent parts of the Description of a Law manifests this first its generical Nature it s a just Act of a Superiors Will. We call Statutes or Laws Acts of Parliament it s their Will what the Subject should do Psal 33.8 He commanded and it stood fast Psal 143. Teach me to do thy Will and in the Lords Prayer Thy Will be done 2. The Author of a Law is the most Supream Power Dominative Power as the Master over the Servant the Father Husband Tutor c. Juridical Power is not Judges are but Administrators Applyers of the Law to particular Cases and Persons they are Jussa Populi rogante Magistratu the Peoples Commands ratified by the Supream Magistrate It 's very diminutive English of Jussa when it 's called Votes that is only Wishes the old Saxon word is Lowe Consent because a Covenant between Prince and People is the Spring of Laws But why all this Authority The Command needs it it 's to Work hard Work is required and we need Awe to put us on hence Exod. 19. 20. God sets an Emblem of his Power and Authority before his Law 3. The Effects are 1. Obligation 2. Command and Prohibition 3. Punishment or Impunity by permission but all terminate in Works And tho' the Mediatorial Law which was the most severe Penal Law that ever was Sufferings being the great Duty yet the Fruit of it is called Work and Doing I come to do thy Will and to work the Work of his Father 4. The Subjects of the Law are by way of Eminency call'd Subjects Rom. 3.19 They that are under the Law are call'd so from its Energy and working Efficacy in them And therefore tho' only a rational Creature is a doer of a Law mov'd reasonably by Fear or Hope yet the Efficacy occasions Metaphors in mute Creatures Job 38. Hast thou commanded the Morning since thy Day and our Inclinations to Wickedness are call'd the Law of the Members and Rules of Art are call'd Laws Custom which is a Habit of working is call'd a Law 5. The Matter or Object is Work something to be done Th. A. A Law is a Rule directing our Acts what is to be done and what not And again It 's Divine Wisdom as directive of all our Acts and Motions Biel. It 's a sign of Right Reason dictating what we are obliged to do and what not 6. The Properties are Rom. 7.12 Holy Just and Good 1. Holy from the Matter it distinguishes between Holy Actions and the Vile ones 2. Just from the Manner not to give Laws where not Subjects or where they neither Protect nor can Punish The Law-giver must be able to Save or Destroy what he gives Laws to Jam. 4. therefore it 's ridiculous for Man to give Laws to a Spirit or Conscience in Matters religious and where he has Power he must distribute Burdens and Works by Proportion according to Ability to bring one part of a Nation under Penal Laws and another under Priviledges is not an equal distribution except
true I am under a Guilt and made a Curse but I call thee to Witness from whose sight nothing is hid that the least of 'em is not mine not the smallest Sins of Folly and Infirmity I restored that which I took not away I never contracted the debt I paid others robbed thee of thy Glory and the World of its Harmony and Beauty but I have restored it all again thô they were mine by Imputation they were never mine by Inherency 4. He has Divine Approbation bearing Testimony that he did so tho' he was condemned in the Flesh yet he was Justified in the Spirit 1 Tim. 3.16 The Deity justifi'd what Man condemn'd Isa 50.8 He is near that justifieth me who will contend with me All the Miracles wrought by him were Divine Testimonies but especially his Resurrection Rom. 1.4 And declar'd to be the Son of God with Power according to the Spirit of Holiness by the Resurrection from the Dead Then he was visibly discharg'd out of the Prison of the Grave having satisfi'd Divine Justice and paid the Price of Redemption to the utmost demand Never was there such a Miracle as a Man having the Iniquity of us all laid upon him and yet compleatly give Satisfaction and receive an Acquittance He was rais'd again for our Justification all the Elect virtually rose in him Hence Eph. 1.19 it is reckon'd one of the greatest Effects of Divine Power that ever was 5. By this Work he receives the Title of a Servant and Surety 1. He was a Servant Isa 49.6 It is a light thing that thou shouldst be my Servant to raise up the Tribes of Jacob his Service is describ'd to Enlighten the Gentiles to be a Salvation to the ends of the Earth c. It was hard Service Soul Travel Isa 53. It was great Service to bring them that sate in Darkness to the Glorious Light of Heaven and the Chain'd Prisoners to the Liberty of the Sons of God 2. He was a Surety and this is evident from the other Title Heb. 7.22 By so much was Jesus made a Surety of a better Testament 6. His Service bears all the Denominations due and Properties that a Law uses to what is regulated by it It 's call'd Work I must work the works of him that sent me it was to him a Law of Works tho' to us a Law of Faith Obedience Rom. 5.29 By the Obedience of one shall many be made Righteous and Righteousness often his temper of Mind under it is call'd fear Heb. 5.7 And was heard in that he fear'd and Phil. 2. The Form of a Servant 7. The Rule of his Life and Offices is call'd a Law Gal. 4.4 He was made under the Law and Command Joh. 10.18 This Commandment have I receiv'd of my Father He was under the Mosaical Law He was Circumcis'd He was under the Evangelical for He was Baptiz'd He was under the Moral for He was Holy Harmless and Vndefil'd He was under the Sanction of that Law as well as its Precept Gal. 3.13 Christ hath redeem'd us from the Curse of the Law being made a Curse for us And all this was but a part of his Subjection to the Mediatorial Law There is a Noble Criticism on 2 Sam. 7.19 The English has it thus And is this the Manner of Man O Lord God But it may be translated thus This is the Law of the Man the Lord God as Dorscheus says on the 2d Psal O Wonderful O all together wonderful Law by which God and Man should be united and according to which an unexpected Divine Dispensation should make that this should be the Prerogative of some individual of the Posterity of David that he should be the Lord God! Oseander inferrs a Reason out of the Context the sence of which he renders thus I understand thee to have spoken of that Messiah whose Law requires that he should be God and Man And it does not want Reason for what is said in the 12 13 14. vers agrees best to this Messiah for it is spoken of a Seed that should rise up after his Death which should proceed out of his Bowels but Solomon was both Born and set upon the Throne before David died yea 't is particularly noted in the 19. ver That this Prophesie was of his House a great way off Secondly It is said vers 13 16. That this Kingdom should endure for ever which is expounded Psal 89.7 by the Duration of the Sun Moon and Heaven Thirdly He shall be to me a Son vers 14. he notes his peculiar Subject as Psal 2.7 12. Heb. 1.5 Gods first born Psal 89.28 This is the Interpretation of Calovius Gerard Thilo and Piscator Secondly As to the Nature of this Law and its Righteousness 1. For the Law it differs much from any other Law 1. In Subject Meer-man and God-man differ very far 2. In the Precept the principal thing it requires is Suffering Joh. 10. I have Power to lay down my Life this Commandment have I receiv'd of my Father Suffering is but in Case of failure in other Laws to make them obey annex'd by Sanction to the Law 3. In the Work it is the greatest Work that ever was commanded by Law Isa 61.1 To bind up the broken-hearted to proclaim Liberty to the Captive and open the Prison-doors to them that are bound Act. 3.21 To restore all things to reconcile such Enemies as a Holy God and his Creature become his Enemies to Justifie the Guilty Adopt Aliens to turn an Hell into a Heaven an extensive Work Earth Heaven and Hell he is to be employ'd about he is to Rehead or Recapitulate all things which are in Heaven and Earth a Work of the greatest Trust ever any was in Isa 22.14 They shall hang upon him all the Glory of his Fathers House the Off-spring and Issue All Vessels hang on that Nail that is a Glorious Throne to his Fathers House 4. In that it has no Legal Sanction no Threatnings there was no need of any since he was so sufficient and faithful nor no possibility for the greatest Penalty was the Duty of the Precept 5. The Promises a Name above every Name at his Name every knee must bow Angels Adore and Worship him he is at the Right Hand of the Throne of God 2. * There is a Distinction of Christs Righteousness by Divines us'd 1. Into Divine Righteousness as he is God his has no Law but the Divine Nature to act becoming 〈◊〉 Official proper to the Office of the Mediator 3. Is â—carious common to Men 〈◊〉 Men and therefore shall 〈◊〉 treated under the Head of â—â—putation but I think both â—ay be Comprehended under 〈◊〉 Law of Faith As to the Works or Righteousness of this Law Rom. 3.21 22. It is describ'd to be 1. Righteousness of God 2. Without the Law 3. Witness'd to by the Law and Prophets 4. It is by Faith As to the first Character of it it is on a fourfold account the Righteousness of God
1. It is a Righteousness from God as the Author of it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so it 's expressed in the third of the Philippians it is the Gift of his Grace the Contrivance of his Wisdom and the Effect of his Power It is the Gift of his Grace Rom. 5.17 Much more they which receive abundance of Grace and of the Gift of Righteousness 2 Tim. 1.9 It is a Grace given us in Christ before the World began but is now made manifest By this Righteousness of God Death is abolished and Life and Immortality brought to light God that so loved the World as to give his Son for them gave all things with him and this none of the least of the Gifts which is as freely given as any other for we are Justified freely by his Grace It is also a Fruit of the depth of the Riches of the Knowledge of God the Angels stand amazed at the Contrivance the most Sagacious of them would have been non-plus'd if asked by what Righteousness a Sinner could be justified It 's one of those things God hath prepared that neither Eye hath seen nor Ear heard nor ever Heart considered it is also an Effect of Infinite Power what Power less could have united Divine and Humane Nature in one Person What Power less could have made a Virgin Conceive What Power less could have brought a Clean thing out of an Unclean and Caused one to be born of a Woman and partake of Humane Flesh and Blood and yet be Sinless It is a kind of Generation none can declare What Power less could have done that great Work and Service he was appointed by this Law The Angels that excell in Strength being all put together could never have performed a thousand part of it the restoring of all things to their Primitive Beauty and Order What Power less could bear the Burden of Guilt the weight of one Sin is an intolerable burden to a Soul No Man were able to stand if God should mark Iniquity but this sure Foundation Stone bore the guilt of the whole World but never did yield nor give way did neither shrink split or flinch he is a tried Stone and found to be a sure Foundation he could rise again from the Grave notwithstanding the weight of this Grave-stone of Guilt 2. It 's the Righteousness of God Subjectively because the Righteousness of that Person who is God as the Blood of the Humane Nature is called the Blood of God to feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own Blood All the Works of his Person by Reason of their Conformity to the Mediatorial Law are called Righteousness Rom. 10.3 Have not submitted themselves unto the Righteousness of God for Christ is the end of the Law So we see the Righteousness of God is the Righteousness of Christ ◠Person in whom the Law gained all its ends for he obeyed all its Precepts he suffered all its Threatnings and he purchased all its Promises too 3. It 's the Righteousness of God in Opposition to all Humane Righteousness it 's his in Opposition to our own he is Jehovah our Righteousness not Adam's or Mans Righteousness 4. It is the Righteousness which alone God can accept a Sinner for he cannot be Just and yet justifie a Guilty Person for any other Righteousness but this he is the Lamb that takes away the Sins of the World This was the Sacrifice God was well pleased with God is pleased with the Sacrifices of a broken Spirit for part of Duty being Sincere but for no part of the price This is my Beloved Son in whom I am well pleased Isa 42.21 The Lord is well pleased for his Righteousness sake Act. 13. For all that Believe by him are justified from all things By the Obedience of one many are made Righteous Rom. 5.19 Secondly It is without Law 1. As to its Existence obliging us it was not directed or regulated by Ceremonial Judicial or Moral Law for tho' it may be call'd the Natural Law of a Mediator because one cannot be a Mediator without performing such Duties yet it 's distinct from any other Law Moral or Natural taken in its whole Latitude these are distinguish'd as a part from the whole 2. It was manifested without the Law now for tho' the Ceremonial did represent it that Dispensation was at an end it was now more perspicuously Taught the Moral never taught it 3. We are interested in it without Law we cannot be interested in any other Righteousness without obeying the Law Directing and Commanding it but we are interested in this by Believing Thirdly It is witness'd to by the Law and Prophets Isa 2.2 Out of Zion shall go forth the Law and the Word of the Lord from Jerusalem Prucknerus thus This is the Law of Faith Rom. 3.27 The Hearing of Faith Gal. 3.2 The Word of Faith Rom. 10.8 This is the Gospel the Gospel is the Narration of all Christ has done for us with the offer of it to us and all he did was ordered by the Mediatorial Law and therefore is called a Law Hackspanus thus Jalkut on this place says All the Consolations which God is to give to Man shall arise out of Sion for it is said Out of Sion shall go forth a Law Hence the Jews did expect their Salvation as well as we and they bear Testimony that it is no new Law but a new Doctrine and the Text it self calls it the Word of the Lord from Jerusalem to wit that Word which was the Subject of the Apostolical Sermons which Rom. 1. was the Gospel Another Testimony we have from the 19th Psalm where it is said The Law of the Lord is Perfect Converting the Soul that by this is meant the Apostolical Doctrine may be seen from Rom. 10.18 where it 's cited that it was Prophesied their sound should go to the Ends of the Earth that the Gospel Light should be as Vniversal as that of Sun and Moon The Papists pretend to prove the Corruption of the Original Text because what the Hebrews calls Lines both the Version of the Seventy and the New Testament translated Sound their sound went unto all the Earth but in Sence they are agreeable For the Sun and Moon have their Course by Lines which Lines do Tipifie the Travels of the Apostles and their Followers or the spreading of a Voice by Lines in the Air Bellarm. Capell and Grot. think the Word was formerly read Kolam and by Corruption turned into Kavam but the Masora Marks it to be an once read Word whereas Kolam by their marks is read fifteen times As the Prophets bare Testimony to this Law so they do to its Righteousness Jer. 23.6.33.16 This is the Name whereby he shall be called The Lord our Righteousness Abravanel reads thus This is the Name whereby the Lord shall call him to wit the Messias our Righteousness wherein he grants the Office of the Messiah but denies his Divinity but the Accent joining Lord and
and ten Years after Christ oh the 12th Chap. 3. he cites Deuteronomy 29.1 These are the Words of the Covenant and thus expounds it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Covenant is nothing else but a Law and the Midrash on Leviticus distinguishes thus between Statutes Judgments and Laws in Chap. 26.46 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Law is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Doctrine Learning and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Statutes are Midrashoth Glosses Expositions and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Judgments are Hadaenin Decisions of Cases in Law and Aben Ezra on psal 19.8 gives this Etymon of it the Law is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Law because it shows the Right way and Converts Souls by taking away their Doubts and Fears But since they mean by Doctrine of Faith the Gospel and the Gospel being regulated by this Mediatorial Law Law of Faith and Doctrine of Faith are the same things and it is usual in Scripture to use a Law and its Works of Righteousness promiscuously Hence without the Law and without Works are the same and so the Law of Faith and the Doctrine of Faith are the same for it 's a Doctrine of what was done in Conformity to this Law Thirdly The Opposition between the two Members in this Text doth Confirm it for Law of Faith cannot be here understood a Law requiring Evangelical Faith as a specifical distinct Duty from the Works the other Law did require For first Faith it self is a Work 2 Thes 1.11 The Work of Faith with Power 1 Thes 1.3 Remembring your Work of Faith and in John To Work the Work of God is to Believe For thus there would be no Distinction betwixt the Law of Works and Law of Faith for the Moral Law required Faith in God and the Ceremonial Law required Faith in him that was Typified by their Sacrifices But to come nigher to this Opposition as it is explained by the Socinians and Arminians it must either lie in the Object or in the Precept or Duty but in none of them As to the Object God and Christ there is no Essential difference there for either it must be between the Persons and then there must be three Faiths specifically distinct Or it must be between the Office and Nature and we cannot say there is any greater Distinction there between God and Mediator than between God and Creator God and Preserver or Governor or Sanctifier all which are Incitements and Motives of our Faith or Love or as Mr. Durham calls it Objectum Considerationis or as Cloppenburgh Objectum Formale sub qua but not Ratio formalis quae vel propter quam and such distinct Formalities make no distinct Worship or Faith We see the Lords bringing the People out of Egypt is set down as an Incitement to their Observation of the Moral Law I am the Lord thy God which brought thee out of the Land of Egypt it is far from making a new Law distinct from the Moral so Gods becoming our Redeemer and delivering us out of the Regions of Darkness and Prisons of Bondage is the strongest Motive that ever was and this Sinning against such a Motive which is a Sin against the Gospel is the greatest Sin and as there is no specifically distinct Object in the first Table so there is none in the second to render our Evangelical Obedience to it distinct from our Moral For the Sympathizing with our Neighbour under Adversity as it s said Bear you one anothers Burdens and so fulfill the Law of Christ it is no farther remote from Loving our Brother being only Charity denominated from his Condition than not stealing of his goods from him killing of him bearing false Witness against him or those other Precepts are but it 's called the Law of Christ because that kind of Love was the Spring of all his Obedience to the Mediatorial Law the principal part of his Work was to bear our Burden but the Socinians are in a greater difficulty here than others who deny the Deity of Christ and yet do Religiously Worship him Their Work should be how to find out a new Table not how to find out a new Law to place a kind of Obedience in that is neither proper to God nor Man nor are they altogether free of this Task who thô they own the Mediator to be God yet as such talk of a specifical distinct Law of Duties to him from what we owe to God as to Repentance the Ability to perform it and the Acceptance of it being interrupted and imperfect Duty flows from the Gospel yet there is a Necessity that the Law it is regulated by be the same Law that was broken It was Mans Duty to Love God to fear him to have Faith in him and to obey him he has now by Sin omitted these Duties what is else the Essence of his Repentance but the repeating and renewing of it again that he that broke the Law now keep it If he observe not the Law he did violate it is no Repentance Repentance and Primitive Obedience differ no more than the Image of God that Man was created in and Regeneration which is a renewing of him to the same likeness of Knowledge Righteousness and Holiness as the Divine Nature is the rule of this Image both in one and the other else it were no Image so that Holy and perfect Law of God founded on what is his due from what he has been and is to the Creature called the Moral Law is the same Rule to our Actions distinct Formalities in Objects make distinct Sciences and Arts and may occasion distinct Precepts or Acts for it is an imperfect Law if it reach not to every Condition of the Subject Hence Suarez says The Law of Nature before and after the fall differ only as the Acts of the same Law in Time of Peace and War The Law says one thing to a Married Man and another to an Unmarried it has distinct Statutes to every Condition but the Law is one A Law meets with many changes and yet remains the same as a Man doth and is yet the same Man in Essence 1. In Use it may serve for directing the Obedient convincing and condemning the Guilty and be the same Law still So the Moral Law was that we were to be justified or condemn'd by in the Primitive State that use of it ceases when the Soveraign Prince Pardons then the Dignity of the Intercessor or his own Bowels of Mercy is his Measure So God now proceeds with us according to what our Mediator has done for us that is the Law of Faith not according to what we have done It is strange to say Faith in a Mediator will justifie and not Faith in God or that Faith in God belongs not to the Moral Law or that it s now having a Pardon for its Object and before a Reward brings it under another Law the Angels have many a new Duty and new Object of Faith but their Law remains the same 2. The
establish another here is little Gospel A second difficulty is we must either say Christ has purchas'd to us Pardon for Sins against the Gospel-Law or for none at all but that one Sin of Adam's if the Moral Law be abrogat'd after the Fall we never sinn'd against any Law but the Gospel's for we were under no other Law according to him but how contrary is this to the Nature of the Gospel whose greatest Cordial is Remission of all Sins against the Law He brings a twofold Remedy or Solution to these Difficulties 1. The Gospel renders all the Duties possible it Commands hence is it call'd the Power of God and Law of the Spirit And the Reason why the Law was imperfect before the Gospel was because there was not Power to obey a perfect Law God cannot Command what is impossible This is no less oppress'd with Difficulty than the Distemper it 's brought to Cure For 1. Doth God lose his Right because we lose our Power the Devils have no Power to obey do they therefore not Sin he was a Lyar and Murderer from the beginning he continues it doth he not Sin in it If Sin be worse than Suffering and there be no Sin in Hell Hell is better than this Earth Some would help him at this strait with the Distinction of Moral and Physical Impotence God cannot justly command what is Physically impossible but he may what is Morally so but he Scoffs at it as an Impotent Brat of Amyraldus nurs'd by Mr. Baxter and Mr. Truman and I think it affords little relief For when the Impotence is insuperable yea more unconquerable than Physical Impotence wherein is there a greater Foundation to Justice because Sinners like to have it so are we not Mad and Distracted and may we impose on Fools what we will because they may like it it looks like Tickling a Man to Death But 2dly Granting that which is certainly false that the Gospel renders all it requires both Morally and Physically possible it makes not the Gospel better than the Law for in Innocence all commanded was more than barely possible But the second and grand Remedy is that thô the Law require perfect Obedience yet not under the Penalty of Death there is no Law that threatens Death to every Sin but to particular kind of gross Sins 1 Cor. 6.19 Gal. 5.19 Yea only to Impenitence This is the Gospel Law this is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but still difficulties attend it and divide the Parties 1. Some say this is an aequi-just Interpretation of the Moral Law others of the Gospel Law 2. Some say this is a Law and Constitution Evangelical by it self others that it is an Administration of the Law by Soveraign Power set in a Throne of Grace but not Law 3. Some say this is proper to the Gospel Law others that the Moral Law did admit of it also and that if â—ve had had only an Inclination to eat of the Forbidden Fruit which in the Rigor of the Law was a Sin and refrain'd from compleating the Act which was the Violation of the Covenant formally she should not have dy'd It were too operose to follow all these Tracts the Multitude of them would render one Jealous that they are not the Kings High-way but some private Paths that do derogate from the True and Living Way In General this doth Enervate the Law of God the Law of Faith establishes the Law but this doth Emasculate it and turn it into a meer Counsel and Advice What else is a Law without Sanction Yea no Law so there is no Sin but Impenitence and indeed they call the rest Venial peccadillo's Secondly It is repugnant to the Moral Law to admit of Aequity because it is most aequal in it self those Laws admit of Chancery and Aequity that would in some Circumstances become rigorous and cruel but there is no such thing in the Divine Law It would be contrary to Aequity and so unjust to establish a Law requiring partial Love to God and partial Obedience Thirdly This Doctrine opens a door to Antinomianisme and History tells us it sprung from such a Mistake that Faith and Repentance were taught and commanded by the Gospel and they contain'd all necessary to Salvation so the Law was needless And Lemborgh says much the same The Gospel needs no Law to be a Schoolmaster to lead to Christ it has more terrible Threatnings of its own than the Law has to drive men to Christ with that Scripture Phrase belongs to the Ceremonial Law Fourthly This would put an Honour on the Mediatour above God that Imperfect Obedience to his Law might merit Heaven or what is of as much worth an Interest in Christ a right to his Merits but no less than Perfect Obedience to Gods Law can merit it Fifthly It would much derogate from Gods Honour who is now content to give his Favour and his Rewards on easier rates than before he would have had perfect Service now partial will serve And consequently Sixthly Boasting would not be excluded by the Law of Faith for Man might boast God was come to Easier Terms he should lose Glory by the change of the Covenants not gain But
or Vertue in a Mans Conversation towards God or Man is natural as to the Principle for what are Principles of Action in a Man by common Gift of Knowledge or Honest Inclinations are natural Principles Before the Law given to Moses we may find footsteps of all the Ten Commandments for Abel believed in God which is the Duty of the first and Sacrificed which is the Duty of the second and in the third Generation when but very few Families on the Earth and not above three to wit Adam Seth and Enos's that were Worshippers except we Charitably Hope some were Proselites of the Cainitish Race publick worship was established for then Men began to call upon the Name of the Lord This was Obedience both to the second and third Commandment which did suppose Obedience to the fourth to wit a sanctifying some publickly known Time for Worship whose Determination God by Positive Command had fixed though from a natural Reason to wit the Seventh-day in which God had rested from the greatest and best of Works he had yet done in the World The fifth and the seventh Command is manifest in the Practice of Marriage for therein was the Period of Subjection to Parents terminated in leaving Father and Mother and an Aera of faithfulness to the Wife begun express't in cleaving to her and it is probable that last and crowning Duty of Childrens Subjection to their Parents is taxed as broken by these Sons of God who took unto themselves Wives according to their own Choice Gen. 6.7 The sixth and ninth Command were both broke by Cain who murdered his Brother and then not only denied it but denied the Knowledge of such a Fact Gen. 4.8 9. The eighth and tenth Command are thought by some especially the Quietists to have been neither Commands nor broken because there could be no Coveting of enlarging Property but rather of Men to share of the common good and Sin gave occasion to particular Commands though of such a General Nature But we find Adam guilty of both in coveting of a Diety and robbing God of his Property when but one Tree was reserved in all the World for an acknowledgment of Gods having the Primitive Right And we find Gen. 6. that the abounding Lusts of the Heart was the cause of the Deluge and all Lust is coveting The Ordinance of Circumcision was appointed to be a Monument and Conviction of the Lusts of the Heart and the Necessiâ—y of Mortification the Sweat of the Brow and toil of labour were appointed as the means of our Maintenance and the Nimrodical Hunting was a robbing men of what God had blessed their labour in So we find the Moral Law in this Law of Nature The next Enquiry is about the Evangelical Law whether any Prints of that is to be found under it yea or not and taking the natural Law most properly and as here the Apostle explains it in his Discourse for a Sign of Divine Will about our Duty as revealed in Nature or by Creation and Providence we may find footsteps of it here 1. For the Duties of it here are both Faith and Repentance rendred concludable from Divine Forbearance and Goodness Rom. 2.4 Not knowing that the Goodness of God leadeth thee to Repentance but after thy hardness and impenitent Heart c. 2. As there are Evangelical Duties so Evangelical Influence Chap. 1.18 Who hold the Truth in Vnrighteousness here was a Truth preserved alive against their Wills and as Gen. 6.3 the Spirit of the Lord was said to strive with men and 1 Pet. 3.20 Those Souls that are now in Prison had once the Spirit of Christ dealing with them and also Evangelical Acceptance If the Vncircumcision keep the Righteousness of the Law shall not his Vncircumcision be counted for Circumcision for Circumcision is not that which is outward in the Flesh but in the Man whose Praise is of God Therefore the Law of Nature being excluded there is an Evangelical Law excluded which Suarez calls the Con-natural Law and Gratian says Jus naturale est quod in lege Evangelio continetur and Mr. Baxter says It is the first Edition of the Covenant of Grace which two ways was published to all the World 1. By Natural Light discovering God Merciful in his Nature 2. By External Proclamation 1. Once to Adam that there should come a Seed of the Woman who should tread down the Head of the Serpent 2. In Noah and 3. In Christ For altho' none comes to the Father but by the Son and there is no other Name given under Heaven by which men might be saved yet it doth not follow that particular and distinct Knowledge of the Messiah was absolutely Necessary for that many Infants who were saved have not and the Disciples who lived with Christ were doubtful about it yea Peter forbid him to yield to Death when he was very nigh to suffer for it The Third Law excluded is the Moral Law whereof the Decalogue qui 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 receives all things is the Summe To take the Moral Law according to common Sentiments there is by it these three things added to the Natural Law 1. A Positive Institution with great Solemnity from Mount Sinai with several Positive Determinations that are not immediately concludable by the Light of Nature 2. The Spiritual Extension of the Moral Law is manifested through Corruption much of the Law of Nature was obscur'd as whether Fornication or Usury were Sins or Thoughts of the Mind before Formal Consent or latent Inclinations to Unlawful Things A third Edition is of Life and Authority to the Sanction men very much Question whether a Man was liable to Eternal Death for evil Inclinations Yea or No but this Law is added because of Transgression that is both to discover it as the Apostle says Rom. 7. I had not known Sin if the Law had not informed me so the Conviction of Sin was weak until the renewed Sanction of the Law has made it more terrible Sin gets many fair Colours Covetousness gets the Name of Frugality until the Spirit discover both the Sin and the Curse doubtful Duties are establish'd weak and faint Notions reviv'd corrupt Thoughts are corrected the need of a Saviour more Manifested and the Jewish State settled in a more perfect Condition than any State in the World Now we find this Law is excluded for Rom. 3.20 For by the Law is the Knowledge of Sin there is no Law discovers Sin so as the Moral The Natural Law discovers Sin but neither so powerfully nor so plainly the express Word of God discovers the Malignity of Sin the Root and Original of Sin and the dreadful Issue and Event of Sin more plainly and clearly and removes all those Fogs and Mists that created many doubts by which we were apt to think great Sins small small Sins none and no Sins so hateful in the sight of God as they are The Ceremonial Law discovers Sin but by Accident its Primitive Intention