Gen. 7.2 where mention is made of cleane and uncleane beasts which difference was observed before the floud and continued by tradition not in regard onâ—y of sacrifice but also for their eating as it may appeare in the reviving of this law afterward Levit. 11.47 That there may be difference betweene the uncleane and cleane and betweene the beast that may be eaten and the beast that may not be eaten that then is said by the definition of the law to bee a cleane beast that might be eaten that uncleane that might not be eaten So I conclude this question with the sentence of Ambrose Quicoâ—vivium adornat c. he that prepareth a feast doth kill his oxen and fat cattell before and then biddeth his guests so the Lord ante homini caeterorum animalium praeparavit epulas before prepared the meats of other beasts and then as his friend invitavit ad convivium bid him to the banket Epist. 37. His opinion is that the cattell were provided of God to bee meat for man Mercerus is of another judgement that the eating of flesh was generally forborne before the floud which is also the opinion of the Hebrewes 1. both because it was necessary for the preservation of the kinds of cattell 2. as also herbs being then of greater vertue and strength before the floud and after might suffice for mans sustenance Mercer in v. 29.1 ch Gen. But these reasons conclude not 1. Like as after the floud when liberty was granted to eat flesh as the greene herb yet they did forbeare for a time till the breed of Cattell was increased upon the like reason before the floud immediately after the creation they might abstaine for a time from the eating of flesh but not altogether 2. The great vertue and strength of herbs concludeth that the eating of flesh was not so generall or necessary then as afterward but the whole abstinence from all kind of eating of flesh it concludeth not I rather preferre Musculus opinion who upon the sacrificing of beasts and wearing of their skins inferreth that beasts were killed before the floud and consequently their flesh eaten in 1. Gen. v. 29. 4. The didactica that is places of doctrine observed out of this first chapter 1. Doct. Of the Trinity proved 1. AGainst the Jewes that deny the Trinity and the Sabellians which affirme but one person in the Deity we have evident proofe in this chapter vers 1. where the word God or in the hebrew elohim gods is joyned to a verbe of the singular number bara created noting the singularity of the Godhead and plurality of the persons But exception is taken against this argument by Cajetanus for the which he is reproved of Catharinus another Popish writer lib. 4. animad ver and by Bellarmine lib. 2. de Christ. c. 6. for that it is the use of the Hebrewes to joyne words of the plurall with a verbe of the singular number upon which reason this collection is misliked also by Calvin and Mercerus but it may be replied that it is not the use of the Hebrewes to put in the plurall number that which hath no plurality in nature as to say Gods if there were but one person in the godhead But yet this argument for the Trinity is more evident vers 26. Let us make man after our image c. where God neither speaketh to himselfe saying let us make not I will make neither yet to the earth as though that wrought together with God nor to the Angels for God only created man vers 27. nor yet doth God speake in the plurall number according to the fashion of great men for that use of speeâ—h was not yet knowne but in this forme of speech is set forth the consultation of the blessed Trinity the Father Sonne and holy Ghost 2. Doct. That the heavens and earth had a beginning 2. OUt of the first verse wee conclude that the world had a beginning and that it was created by God contrary to the opinion of Xenophanes who held the world to bee without beginning or end and of the Epicures who did impiously hold that the world was made by chance by the concurrence of bodies together and of Aristotle among the heathen and Eugubinus in Cosmopeia among Christians who affirme Coelum empyraeum the highest and supreme heaven to have beene eternall Likewise wee condemne the folly of the lying Aegyptians and Chaldees who extend the age of the world many thousand yeares before it was made The Aegyptians boasted that they had a continuall succession of Kings 70. thousand yeares Augustine maketh mention of a letter that Alexander writ to his mother Olympias wherein he reporteth that hee heard of an Aegyptian Priest that the Kingdome of the Assyrians exceeded 5000. yeares of the Persians 8000. yeares Pompeius Mela writeth that they have chronicles of 13000. yeares Diogenes Laertius from Vulcan to Alexander accounteth 48860. yeares August lib. 12. de civitate dei cap. 10. The Aegyptians also reckon 100. thousand yeares since they first learned Astrology de civitat dei 18. c. 40. All these are lying fables seeing by just computation of yeares it is found that the world hath not yet continued since the first beginning thereof 6000. yeares 3. Doct. The word from the beginning 3. Vers. 3. THen God said hence Servetus would confirme his wicked error that the word was not from the beginning because the heavens and earth are here said to bee made before God spake But wee have an evident testimony that the word was in the beginning with God and that nothing was made without it Ioh. 1 2 3. and seeing the light was made by this word the word must needs be before the light the cause goeth before the effect so that the heavens and earth were in the beginning made by the word of God but in this place first onely it is added And God said because now more manifestly the wisdome and power of God appeareth in the distinction and perfection of the creatures which before were confused together Calvin Mercer Further another heresie of Servetus is confuted who thinketh that this was a new quality in God to speake which spake not before for this speaking in God was no quality in God as in man but it signifieth only his will and decree though Ab. Ezra doe without cause finde fault with R. Saadian for so expounding this word of God was nothing but Gods decree and commandement whereby the heavens also and earth were first made Psal. 148.5 so that then God thus spake also Calvin Mercer 4. Doct. Of the different beginning of the soules of man and beasts 4. Vers. 24 LEt the earth bring forth every living thing animam viventem the living soule from hence it was gathered that not only the bodies of bruit beasts but their life also and as it were soule were derived out of the earth whereby a manifest difference appeareth betweene the originall of mans soule which was breathed of God
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the paradise of pleasure s. H. hegan a garden guâ—â—den signifieth delight but paradise is derived from pardes which signifieth an ovehard 16. thou shalt freely eat T.g. in eating eat b. heb eat thou H. thou shalt eat meat s. 18. an helper like him b.h. meet for him T.G. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to hâ—m hâ—b as before him Chenegdo v. 20. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like to him s. 23. she shall be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 woman s. virago a mannes h. T. a woman or mannes â— g he ish a man ishah a wâ—man virissa a viresse P. v. 8. the Lord planted a garden eastward in Eden b.g. T.s.p. the Lord planted a paradise of pleasure from the beginning H. C micchedem from the east v. 17. thou shalt eat c. thou shalt die â— g T.h.p. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 câ—t ye 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ye shall dye s. in the plurall v. 21. an heavy or deepe sleepe b.g. soporem a sound sleepe T.h.p. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an extasis which is of the minde rather than of the body f. tardemah of radham a sound sleepe heb v. 24. they shall be one flesh b.g. T. heb they two shall be one flesh s. H. which reading because it keepeth the sense is approved in the Gospell Matth. 19.5 v. 24. shall leave her father and mothers bed Ch. shall leave father and mother câ—t The Exegesis or Theologicall explication QVEST. I. How God is said to have rested 1. GOd rested from all his worke â— Neither as being weary in working but resting is here taken only 〈…〉 or leaving to worke 2. Neither did he rest from his workes to receive any use thereof or benefit to himselfe but the wiseman sheweth how God taketh delight in his workes Prov. 8.31 I tooke my solace in the compasse of the earth and my delight is in the children of maâ— he made all things for 〈◊〉 use and man for his owne glory not that by man there is any new accession of glory to God which he had not for infinite was the glory of the blessed Trinity before the world was Ioh. 17.5 but by man Gods glory in the world is manifested not to Gods benefit but to his owne everlasting reward 3. Neither is God said simply to rest but only from the workes of the creation by his providence he worketh still in the preservation of those things which he hath made Iohn 5.17 My father worketh hitherto and I worke QVEST. II. How the Lord is said to have made an end of his worke the seventh day Vers. 2. IN the seventh day God finished his worke c. 1. Not that God made any of his workes upon the seventh day as Hierome urgeth this place against the Iewes tradition in Genes 2. neither is it so said because God in the last point of the sixt day finished his worke which therefore is counted of the seventh as the Hebrewes 3. Neither need we with the Septuagint to read sixt for seventh which were a corrupting of the text 4. Nor yet with some Hebrewes to understand the creation of the seventh day for God had already appointed the dayes to follow in order and the dayes are not properly said to bee created but the workes made therein 5. Neither yet doe wee approve the conceit of Aben Ezra who saith that the end or absolution of a worke is no worke 6. But without any more controversie the meaning is no more but this that God had now already upon the seventh day finished his worke the finishing was done before but now the Lord beheld it as complete and perfect Mercer Iun. QVEST. III. The meaning of these words vers 3. which he created to be made Vers. 3. WHich he created to be made 1. This is neither to bee referred to the eternall purpose of God to create those things which after were made as Rupertus lib. 2. de Trinitat c. 18. for Gods decree and purpose to create the world is of like eternity to himselfe but the creation had a beginning 2. Neither by these words to be made is signified the power of generation given to the creature to make like to it selfe for from this worke Gods providence ceaseth not still 3. Neither is insinuated thereby the end to the which and order wherein every thing was made as Cajetanus for this was done in the creation that beside it there need no new making 4. But either it is a phrase of the Hebrewes who for more certainty and emphasis of speech doe use to double the word as vers 16. in eating thou shalt eat vers 17. in dying thou shalt dye that is shalt freely eat and surely die so God created in making that is powerfully and wonderfully made Mercer or the words are inverted and may be placed thus in setting making before created as Tremellius and R. Isaac he rested from making the work which he had created 5. Or if we make any difference the creation was in the beginning of heaven and earth as the matter and substance the making was of the forming of the creatures on the six dayes out of that substance before by God created and prepared Muscul. 6. But most ridiculous and blasphemous is that fable of some Hebrewes that this worke which God created to make and made not were the Faunes and Satyres which God made in the evening upon the sixt day and being short of time could not finish them ex Muscul. QVEST. IIII. The Sabbath instituted of God after the creation Vers. 4. GOd blessed the seventh day and sanctified it Here wee have the institution of the Sabbath which afterward was revived by the promulgation of the morall law We refuse therfore the erronious opinion of Tostatus and Pererius two Popish writers who do think that this sanctifying of the Sabbath is here mentioned by way of anticipation being not instituted till the time of Moses for every day to man in the state of innocency should have beene a Sabbath neither was there any positive precept given to Adam in Paradise but only that of not eating the forbidden fruit Perer. in Genes lib. 1. p. 223. But in this affirming they are grosly deceived 1. Man had now transgressed before the Sabbath was instituted as afterward shall be proved and therefore they doe out of time urge the state of mans innocency 2. If man had continued in that state seeing he was appointed to keepe the garden and not to live idly no not in Paradise it is most like that even then he should have kept the Sabbath as a rest intermission even from such labour as became that place and as a symbole unto him of a further perfection to bee attained unto 3. That the Sabbath was instituted now the creation finished it may appeare by the fourth commandement Exod. 20.11 where this reason of the law is given For in six dayes the Lord made
even in that place in the wildernesse she had seene an Angell Mercer 7. But the right and proper meaning is that she seeth that is liveth after shee had seene God for they thought no man could see God and live and therefore Iacob also said I have seene God face to face and my life is preserved Gen. 32.30 QVEST. XI Who is understood by the living and seeing Vers. 14. THe well of him that loâ—eth and seeth 1. Some referre both unto God 2. some to the Angell who as Gods Minister though not as God liveth and seeth 3. Some living understand of Ismael that lived 4. But Hagar saying the well of the living and seeing by living understandeth her selfe that lived after this glorious sight by seeing God which seeth our afflictions QVEST. XII Of Cades and Sur. BEtweene Cadesh and Bered 1. These were two places in the wildernesse of Sur which extended to the red sea 2. Cadesh is that place where the water gushed out of the Rocke and the people murmured against God Numb 20. 3. It is called a well and before a fountaine because it was a deepe fountaine for as Augustine saith omnis putens fons non omnis fons puteus Every well may be called a fountaine not euery fountaine a well QVEST. XIII Why Abraham not Hagar gave the name to Ismael Vers. 15. ABraham called his name Ismael c. 1. Before it is said thou shalt call and here Abraham giveth the name as he had learned of Hagar and so in effect she gave it Perer. 2. For the Lord would not by his oracle diminish the right of the father to whom it belonged to give the name Muscul. as Eva is said to have given Seth his name Genes 4.25 yet Adam first called him so Gen. 5.3 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Evill must not be done that good may come thereof Vers. 2. I Pray thee goe in unto my maid it may be I shall be builded by her c. Sâ—ra though shee had a good intent that Gods promise concerning Abrahams seed might be accomplished yet shee doth not well to use unlawfull meanes that Abraham may have this seed by a concubine for according to Saint Pauls rule we must not doe evill that good may come thereof Rom. 3.8 And this device of Sara prospered not she being so farre from being builded and increased hereby that the posterity of the seed of Ismael the Ismaelites and Hagarenes became enemies afterward to her owne seed Musculus 2. Doct. They that punish justly are not persecutors Vers. 6. SArai dealt roughly with her Augustine from this example collecteth that they alwayes which inflict punishment are not persecutors and that discipline may be administred justly against the obstinate as Sarai dealt with Hagar Hagar passa est persecutionem à Sara hac tamen sancta erat qua faciebat illa iniqua quae patiebatur Hagar suffered persecution of Sara and yet she was holy that did it the other evill that suffered it Epist. 50. 3. Doct. Religion no enemie to politicke order Vers. 9. HVmble thy selfe under her hands Hagar was a bond-servant whose condition then was very hard yet the Lord commandeth her to returne to her mistresse we see then that religion dissolveth not politicke order neither is the doctrine of faith a doctrine of licentious liberty Hagar though now come to herselfe and called of God yet is not to renounce her condition and state of life according to Saint Pauls rule Let every man abide in the same calling wherein he is called c. 1 Cor. 7.10 Luther 4. Doct. The office of Angels THe Angell of the Lord said to her c. This is the first place that maketh mention of the apparition of Angels This Angel is sent to call home againe Hagâ—r to her station and calling so the Angels chiefe office is to protect the servants of God and to bring home againe those that erre so as the Apostle saith They are all ministring spirits sent forth to minister for their sakes that shall be heires of salvation Heb. 1.14 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Polygamie of the fathers never lawfull or dispensed with Vers. 3. THen Sarai Abrahams wife tooke Agar 1. Some thinke that Abrahams marriage or copulation rather with Hagar was lawfull and that Sarai was moved of God to perswade this marriage to Abraham Ioseph lib. 1. antiquit But this no where appeareth for though God approved Sarai her advice for the casting out of the bond-woman with her sonne Gen. 21.8 yet it followeth not that God liked of her counsell in Abrahams taking her to be his wife 2. Some thinke that adultery was not yet forbidden by any law Ambrose because Abraham was both before the Law and the Gospell he thinketh him to have beene blamelesse Durandus also and Tostatus are of opinion that polygamie was lawfull before it was forbidden by the positive law of the Gospell But the saying of our Saviour a principio non fuit sic from the beginning it was not so sufficiently confuteth these assertions seeing God in Paradise made unto Adam but one Eva one wife for one husband 3. Some simply allowed not the polygamie of the fathers but hold that it was permitted by some speciall dispensation for those times and so though they will not simply justifie it yet they qualifie and excuse it by these reasons 1. Theodoret saith neque natura neque lex ulla tunc scripta c. Neither nature nor any written law did forbid then the having of many wives Cont. Though no law were yet written that made any such prohibition yet they had the law of the creation they two shall be one flesh Matth. 19.5 which was continued by faithfull tradition and the lively examples of the Patriarks 2. This marriage proceeded not of any intemperate lust but was done studio quarendae posteritatis of a desire to increase posterity Ambr. Cont. The Apostle for this hath given us a rule not to doe evill that good may come thereon Rom. 3.8 Abrahams good intention doth not excuse an unlawfull action 3. Abraham did it not of himselfe Augustine saith Voluntatem illius non voluptatem suam implevisse accepisse non petisse that he fulfilled not his owne lust but his wives desire he asked her not but received her And he to this purpose urgeth the Apostle words that the man hath not power over his owne body but the woman 1 Cor. 7. Contra. If this were a good defence then Adams excuse also might have served because the woman gave him thâ— apple and he did eat The Apostle giveth the woman power over her husbands body and the man likewise over the womans to performe mutually the matrimoniall duties but the woman can no more give liberty to the husband to joyne unto strange flesh than the husband can unto the woman As the Apostle in the same place restraineth that liberty Let every man have his wife let every woman have her husband 1. Cor.
obscuring of their sight concerning the object of the doore only as Perer. neither was it a blindnesse procured by any naturall meanes as by the obscuring the object darkning the aire or weakning the sight as Pererius imagineth but it was a miraculous and immediate worke they smote the men with blindnesse they smote not the medium or the object but their sight was generally blind that they had no discerning of one thing from another as the Aramites were blinded that they could neither discerne Elisha the prophet the way nor the City Calvin so that both their discerning and seeing faculty both inward and outward sense were dazled and therefore the word sanuere is put in the plurall number Sanâ—erim they were then as it were san blind which word may very well bee derived from the Hebrew so is the property of such not to discry or discerne things of any distance from them QVEST. IX Lot had only two daughters no other children Vers. 14. LOt went and spake to his sonnes in law c. 1. These were the men unto whom Lots daughters were espoused not already married as some of the Hebrewes thinke and Mercerus that Lot beside the two Virgins had two other daughters married but it may appeare that Lot had no more sonnes or daughters but only two because when the Angell had bid him bring out his sonnes in law his sons and daughters hee onely spake to his sonnes in law therefore sonnes he had none nor other daughters to speake unto but those two which were with him 2. It is evident also that only Lot his wife and two daughters were delivered out of the flames of Sodome 1. that it might appeare that there were no more righteous persons in Sodome so that the number of ten last mentioned by Abraham could not bee made up 2. If any other had escaped if men Lots daughters would rather have practised with them than their father if women they would have entised them to doe the like as they did As for the wine which they drunke they might either carry it themselves or upon beasts there was no such necessary use of servants in that behalfe or which is most like they brought it with them from Zoar. Mercer QVEST. X. Why Lot is willed to speake to those that would not heare him Vers. 14. HE seemed as though he had mocked It will be here questioned why the Lord willeth such to be warned whom hee knew would despise their calling The answer is ready God notwithstanding would have them to be called that they might be more inexcusable and his judgements appeare to be most just like as he hath appointed the Gospell to be preached to all the world yet many are called and few chosen as our Saviour saith Mat. 20.16 ex Calvin QVEST. XI Why Lot and the rest are forbidden to looke backe Vers. 17. LOoke not behind thee The Lord forbade Lot and likewise the rest with him to looke behind them not either because of the Angell that destroyed Sodome or for that it was dangerous to looke into the infected aire as the Hebr. but for these reasons 1. to try their obedience as hee did Adams in prohibiting the eating of an apple 2. to shew hereby the indignity of that place that was not worthy by any honest man to bee looked upon 3. to stay Lots curiosity that he should not too narrowly looke into Gods judgements or gaze upon his workes Perer. 4. as also for more speed sake as the Apostles were likewise forbidden to salute any by the way Iun. 5. that Lots desire and affection might bee sequestred from the pleasures and wealth of the City Calvin QVEST. XII How Lots wife looked behind him Vers. 26. HIs wife looked backe behind him 1. not behind her selfe as the Latine readeth 2. nether yet being behind Lot dragging after him did shee looke backe as Cajetane in c. 19. Genes Mercer 3. neither did she looke behind upon Lot that she might come after him Calvin for then she had not broken the Angels charge 4. but she looked toward Sodome behind and beyond her husband Iun. QVEST. XIII Why God so severely punished Lots wife SHe was turned into a pillar of Salt God shewed this example of severity upon Lots wife 1. for her disobedience 2. her incredulity in not giving credit to Gods word 3. her curiosity in desiring to see the City burning 4. her foolishnesse in pitying the ruine of her countrey kindred and people 5. her affection seemed yet to bee addicted to the pleasures of Sodome and therefore our Saviour giveth a caveat hereof Remember Lots wife Luke 17.32 that wee for saving and loving of this life lose not the next Perer. Calvin QVEST. XIV What pillar of Salt Lots wife was turned into PIllar of Salt 1. Not because Lots wife perished in the fire of brimstone mingled with salt as it is Deut. 29.23 as Aben Ezra for it might as well be said a pillar of brimstone 2. neither is it so called only because it was a durable pillar as an everlasting covenant is called a covenant of salt Numb 18.19 for salt hath a property to preserve things from corruption and decaying 3. Neither was she turned into a pillar of salt because she refused to bring the guests salt the day before as some of the Hebrewes dreame 4. Neither yet is it an allegory to signifie such to be as senslesse pillars which divert their affections from spirituall to earthly and sensuall things as Philo applieth it 5. But hereby is signified that she both was turned into a pillar of materiall salt and that also durable and of long continuance which Iosephus saith remained to be seene in his time Bâ—rchardus long after maketh mention of it in his description of the holy land and the Thargum Hierosolymit saith that it is duratura usque ad tempus resurrectionis to continue till the resurrection but God would have that monument ut praestet fidelibus condimentum c. that it might be a seasoning to faithfull men to take heed of backsliding as Augustine noteth QVEST. XV. What became of Lots wife FUrther 1. Neither must it bee supposed that her soule but her body onely was turned into a pillar of salt Calvin 2. And the Lord might have mercy upon her soule though this chastisement was shewed upon her body 3. And it is most like that this miracle was done before Lot came to Zoar neither is it to be thought that Lot and his two daughters went before and his wife staid behind in the field to looke backe as Cajetane thinketh but it was done in Lots sight and presence for the better example sake before they entred into Zoar for when Lot departed out of Zoar mention is made only of him and his two daughters And they which have travelled that countrey doe testifie that this pillar was to be seene betweene Segor and the dead Sea where Sodome and Gomorrha stood Perer. ex Borchard QVEST. XVI Why
gave him a name Edom Calvin this action was governed by Gods providence and the prophecie began now to take place the elder shall serve the younger QUEST XL. Whether Iacob offended in causing Esau to sell his birthright Vers. 31. SEll me now thy birthright 1. Iacob may be thought to have dealt cruelly with Esau and uncharitably that would give him no releefe being ready to die but upon such hard conditions but the answer is that Esau coveted Iacobs pottage not of necessity for there was other meat in the house whereby he might have satisfied his hunger but of an unsatiable greedinesse 2. But Iacob was too covetous to cause Esau to sell for so small a trifle so rich a thing as his birthright which included many priviledges as the priority and government of his brethren a double portion to the rest the priesthood and right to sacrifice Exod. 19.22 and 24.5 and beside was a type and figure of everlasting life Vatabl. here the answer is not as the Hebrewes thinke that Iacob gave a greater summe and this to be onely as an earnest for no such thing appeareth in the Scripture but the true answer is this that Iacob knew by the instruction of his mother that the birthright by Gods appointment belonged unto him and therefore as a wise man he taketh this occasion to recover his right from him that was an usurper of it 3. But seeing this birthright was a sacred thing for otherwise Esau should not be counted a profane person for selling it how could Iacob buy it without sinne Answer Iacob intelligitur suam vexationem redemisse Iacob did but redeeme his owne vexation he buyeth not a thing which was not belonging to him but onely recovereth that which was his owne and this is not simoniacal in sacred things for a man to redeeme his quietnesse and peaceable possession 4. But seeing Esau sinned in selling his birthright how could Iacob be without sinne yes Iacob offended not being hereunto no doubt stirred and incited by the spirit of God and sparing from his owne belly to obtaine such a blessing preferring things spirituall before temporall but Esau sinned in setting so light by the blessing of God as shall appeare in the next question Mer. yet this extraordinary fact of Iacob is not to be drawne into imitation QUEST XLI Whether before the law the first borne did alwaies exercise priesthood BUt whether the priesthood did goe with the birthright and that the first borne did execute the priests office it is questioned among the learned for the solution whereof 1. I neither thinke with the Hebrewes that the first borne of the family alwayes had the preheminence of the priesthood for Abel the younger brother offered sacrifice as well as Cain 2. Neither with Oleaster that this was never practised whose opinion is that the priesthood was not due to the first borne before the law of Moses in hunc loc for the contrary is evident Exod. 24.5 3. Neither do I wholly assent to Hierome who thinketh that omnes primogeniti ex stirpe Noe that all the first borne of Noahs stocke were priests epist. 126. ad Evag. for then Iapheth rather then Sem should have had that prerogative for hee was elder than Sem being borne in the 500. yeare of Noahs age Gen. 5.32 Sem two yeare after Gen. 11.10 yet Sem was the Priest of the most high God supposed to be Melchisedeck and Noah saith Blessed be the Lord God of Sem Gen. 9.26 4. Neither doth the Apostle call Esau prophane only as Pererius thinketh because he sold the Priesthood annexed to the birth-right for it was a holy thing in respect of the spirituall blessing annexed unto it In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed Gen. 22.18 5. This then is our opinion rather that before Moses the father of the house was the Priest for the family as wee read that Iob every day offered sacrifice for his sonnes but after the father was deceased then the first borne succeeded both in the inheritance and priesthood and so after Isaacks decease the birth-right should also have conveyed with it the Priesthood Mercer But that ordinance that the first borne should exercise the Priesthood and offer sacrifice though he were not the father of the family is no older than Moses Exod. 19.22.24.5 Who then were sanctified and set apart unto God Exod. 13.2 QUEST XXXVII How many wayes Esau offended in selling his birth-right Vers. 32. LOe I am almost dead c. Esau diversly offended in selling his birth-right 1. Because he esteemeth his birth-right only by the present commodity and pleasure of this life for whether he meane in respect of his daily danger in hunting he was subject to death as Iun. Or generally speake of his mortality as Mercer Or which is most like of his present faintnesse Calvin Hee onely limiteth his birth-right to this life as though it could not profit him afterward whereupon the Hebrewes gather that hee denied the resurrection 2. Esau offended in his intemperancy and ravenous desire that preferred his belly before so great and rich a birth-right 3. In that for so meane a value hee would forgoe such an inheritance for whereas Aben Ezra would excuse the matter because Isaack was now become very poore and therefore Esau set the lesse by his patrimony it hath no ground at all for whereas Abraham was very rich and left all to Isaack and God blessed Isaack beside how is it like that Isaack in so short a time could bee wasted 4. Another sinne was Esau his profanenesse noted by the Apostle Heb. 12.16 that parted with a spiritual blessing for a temporal and momentany pleasure 5. His unthankfulnesse to God appeareth in that he no more regarded the dignity of the first borne given unto him 6. His obstinacy in that he repented not his folly but after he had done went away carelesse and therefore it is said Esau contemned his birth-right vers 34. 7. His falshood and persidious nature appeareth who though hee had passed over his birth-right to Iacob with an oath yet seemed to make but a scoffe of it and purposed not in his heart to performe it Perer. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Of the immortality of the soule Vers. 8. WAs gathered to his people Theodoret from hence well concludeth the immortality of the soule and the hope of the resurrection for if men wholly perish and did not passe to another life Moses would not have said He was gathered to his people qu. 109. in Genes our Saviour also useth the like argument to prove that Abraham was alive to God because the Lord calleth himselfe the God of Isaack Abraham and Iacob God is not the God of the dead but the living Matth. 22.23 2 Doct. Order of time not alwayes observed in the sacred histories Vers. 20. ISaack was 40. yeare old c. Whereas Moses setteth downe the death of Abraham and of Ismael before he describeth the
imposition of a new name the testimony of the Prophet Hosee He had power over the Angell and prevailed hee wept and prayed unto him 12.4 all these arguments doe evidently shew that this was a corporall and reall wrestling 3. Neither yet was it only corporall but spirituall also for Iacob did as well contend by the strength of his Faith as by the force of his body Mercerus QUEST XII It was a good not an evill Angell that Iacob wrestled with FUrther a question is moved what manner of Angell this was with whom Iacob wrestled 1. Origen thinketh he did strive against some of the spirituall adversaries such as Saint Paul calleth Principalities and powers and spirituall wickednesses Ephes. 6.12 and that he was assisted by a good Angell 3. lib. Periarch Procopius reporteth the opinion of some that say it was the devill in Esaus likenesse that strived against Iacob and that by the power of an Angell he overcame who lest he should ascribe this victory to his owne strength smote him upon the thigh the Hebrewes say it was Sammael Esaus evill Angel that contended with Iacob for the blessing 2. But these are untrue and improbable assertions 1. Here is mention made but of one that Iacob wrestled with 2. Hee that he wrestled with was the same that blessed him 3. He that strived with him was the same that touched his thigh Ergo it was a good not an evill Angell for an evill Angell would not have blessed him Mercer Perer. QUEST XIII Whether it were a ministring spirit or God Christ with whom Iacob wrestled NEither was this any of the ministring Angels but Christ the Son of God here called a man because he so appeared Pererius striveth to prove that it was an Angell and not Christ. 1. Hosea calleth him an Angell without any addition 12.4 but when Christ is called an Angell some other word is added as the Angell of the covenant Malach. 3.1 Cont. In that place the Prophet sheweth that by the Angell we must understand God for he saith He had power with God and he had power over the Angell and further he found him in Bethel the Angell with whom Iacob wrestled was the same that spake to him in Bethel but he was God Gen. 31.13 I am the God of Bethel Neither alwayes is an epithete added when Christ is called an Angell as Gen. 48.16 Iacob saith The Angell which hath delivered mee from all evill blesse the children But this Angell without any other addition is else-where called the God of Bethel 2. If at any time in the old Testament the sonne of God appeared it is most like in mount Sinai when the Law was given which was the most famous and Noble apparition of all but S. Steven saith Yee have received the Law by the ordinance of Angels Act. 7.53 Angels then appeared not Christ Perer. Cont. The Angels then were ministring Spirits giving attendance and executing their office at the delivering of the Law but it is no good argument the Law was given by the Angels Ergo not by Christ for S. Paul affirmeth both It was ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediator Galat. 3.19 the ministery was of the Angels the authority of Christ. 3. If Christ had appeared at any time then there was greatest cause when word was sent to Mary of the incarnation of the Sonne of God both because of the worthinesse of that mystery and dignity of the person to whom that message was brought Contra. 1. It was not fit that the Sonne of God himselfe should be the Messenger of his owne comming into the world Princes use to send their Ministers and officers before to bring tidings of their comming and it was fit that this great Prince should send his Angels before that it might appeare that he was even Lord of the Angels 2. There was greater reason that the same Angell Gabriel who was the first revealer of this prophecie to Daniel concerning the Messiah 〈…〉 〈…〉 QUEST XV. How it iâ— sâ—id he could not prevaile against Iacob Vers. 25. WHen he saw he could not prevaile 1. Not that either God gave unto Iacob greater strength to resist than the Angell had to assault him as some of the Hebrewes thinke that it was Esaus Angell and so had no greater power than God permitted him for it was no such Angell as is shewed before 2. Neither as Cajetane thinketh Factum est ut Angelus assumeret corpus in 〈◊〉 mensâ—ra virium c. It came so to passe that the Angell assumed a body in such measure of strength as should not be able to overcome Iacâ—b 3. Neither as Tostatus Angelus 〈…〉 non posse superare The Angell fained that he could not overcome Iacob for I have declared before that it was Christ himselfe and not an Angell that wrestled with Iacob 4. Wherefore in that it is said when he saw here the Lord descendeth to our capacity for he knew before the event of this combat and what he had purposed to doe the experience then of the thing is taken for Gods knowledge Calvin and the Lord with the blast of his mouth had beene able to have confounded Iacob But he could not prevaile c. that is the Lord did both fight in and against Iacob he gave Iacob strength to resist and so in Iacob he overcommeth and seipso 〈◊〉 est and so is stronger than himselfe Calvin Thus in effect God could not prevaile against Iacob because hee would not he disposeth of his power according to his owne will and purpose so the Angell said to Lot I can doe nothing till thou be come thither Gen. 19.22 and the Lord to Moses thus saith Let me alone c. Exod. 32.10 Hereby the Lord sheweth how effectuall the faith and prayer of his servants are which as it were binde the Lords hands and doe give us victory in a manner against himselfe QUEST XVI In what place of the thigh Iacob was hurt Vers. 25. HE tâ—â—ched the hollow of his thigh 1. This was neither the inward or broad part of the thigh as the Septuagint read 2. Neither yet was the huckle-bone put out of joynt as some thinke for that could not be without great paine and griefe to Iacob 3. But whereas the word is caph which signifieth the bowing or hollow and so is taken for the palme of the hand and sole of the foot here it properly betokeneth the hollow bone into the which the huckle-bone called ischion runneth we may name it acetabulum the pan of the huckle-bone this hollow bone was not out of joynt but it onely hanged by reason of the sinew or nerve that goeth out of the pan or hollow to the huckle-bone which was hurt as it is expressed vers 32. QUEST XVII How long Iacob continued in his halting NOw whereas Tostatus thinketh that Iacob the next day was perfectly recovered of this hurt to whom Iunius subscribeth because cap. 33.18 it is said that Iacob came safe to Sichem I thinke rather
selling of Ioseph and of Christ to agree in the summe who was sold for 30. pence but it is not necessary that the type should be answerable in every particular circumstance 5. The Hebrewes thinke that the ordinary price of servants was 30. sicles but that they abated ten because they sold Ioseph in secret but it appeareth otherwise in the law where the price of redemption of the male from five yeares to twenty is twenty shekels Levit. 27.5 But in this place they had no respect to any custome or law but according to their number they set the price of 20. shekels for every one of them which were ten in all two shekels for Benjamin was very young not above foure or five yeare old and could not give consent and Ruben afterward gave consent unto them Mercer QUEST XXIV Of the counsell of Iudah to sell Ioseph into captivity Vers. 26. IVdah said what availeth it if we slay though we keepe his bloud secret c. 1. They were resolved already not to lay violent hands themselves upon Ioseph but to suffer him to perish in the pit and yet Iudah so accounteth of it as if they should slay him themselves 2. Iudah was moved by the spirit of God to deliver Ioseph from this second death yet he sheweth his hatred in that he giveth counsell to make a bond-slave of him which was a bad as death 3. Iudah by this meanes thinketh to avoid three inconveniences first the shedding of his bloud secondly to take him from his father who was so affected toward him thirdly to prevent the honour which Ioseph dreamed of 4. The Hebrewes thinke that for this compassion in Iudah afterward Daniel of that tribe was delivered from the Lyons but it is certain that upon this occasion of selling Ioseph into captivitie the Israelites afterwards went downe into Egypt and were afflicted with a long and hard bondage 5. In the meane time while they were making their bargaine Ioseph did intreat his brethren with many prayers and teares Gen. 42.22 but they would not heare him Mercerus QUEST Where Ruben was when Ioseph was sold. Vers. 29. RVben returned to the pit 1. Ruben was absent when Ioseph was sold some thinke to minister to his father according to his course some to mourne alone by himselfe for the sinne committed with his fathers concubine But it is most like that he went about some other way to the pit to have taken Ioseph thence secretly and therefore Iosephus thinketh that Ruben came thither in the night Mercer 2. Philo thinketh that after Ruben understood that his brethren had sold Ioseph he utterly misliked it making them worse than theeves for they prey upon strangers but these upon their owne brother lib. de Iosâ—ph but it is more like that Ruben did rest satisfied after he understood that they had not killed him and consented unto them Mercer 3. Before he knew what was done he cryed out Whither shall I goe both because he was the first-borne and therefore should bee most blamed for the losse of Ioseph Muscul. as also for that he had so lately offended his father before for his incestuous act Iun. QUEST XXVI Of the sprinkling of Iosephs coat with bloud and the deceiving of Iacob Vers. 31. THey tooke Iosephs coat and killed a kid c. 1. Iosephus thinketh that they brought Iosephs coat themselves but the text is otherwise vers 32. they sent it but Iosephus ghesseth right that they sent the coat rent and torne as though indeed some wilde beast had devoured Ioseph and they dipped it in a kids bloud which they say is most like unto mans bloud 2. Iosephus also is deceived in that he thinketh that Iacob had some knowledge before of Iosephs captivity but now changeth his minde thinking surely that Ioseph was devoured for from whence could Iacob have any knowledge what was befallen Ioseph but by his brethren who were sure to keepe it secret from their father ex Perer. 3. Rupertus hath also a strange opinion that Iacob was not so simple when he saw the bloudy coat to thinke that a beast had devoured every part of Ioseph nothing to remaine but his coat but that he did surmise that his brethren had killed him but durst not tell his sonnes of it because he saw them so maliciously bent for Iacob sheweth the contrary by his owne words that he gave credit to their report that an evill beast indeed had spoiled Ioseph vers 33. and if Iacob had so thought hee would not have spared by his fatherly authority to rebuke his sonnes to bring them to repentance 4. It is like that afterward when it was knowne to Iacob that Ioseph lived that his brethren confessed the truth to their father and acknowledged their fault but that Iacob seeing how God had turned Iosephs captivity to the good of them all therein considering Gods providence spared to rebuke them as Ioseph upon the same reason did forbeare his brethren Gen. 45.7 5. Simeon and Levi as they were most cruelly given as it appeareth by the destruction of the Sichâ—mites are thought to have bin the principall actors against Ioseph which may be the cause that afterward Simeon was bound by Iosephs commandement so the Hebrews thinke that Iudas that betrayed Christ was of the tribe of Simeon as the Priests and Scribes were of Levi that put him to death And as Iudah here might have counsell to deceive Iacob with the bloud of a kid so hee himselfe was deceived of Thamar about a kid Mercer QUEST XXVII The greatnesse of Iacobs sorrow for Ioseph Vers. 34. HE sorrowed for his sonne a long season c. Many things increased the sorrow of Iacob for his sonne Ioseph 1. Because he imagined that Ioseph was devoured of some beast Ne frustum quidem superest quod sepulchro infâ—ratur There was no part of him left to be committed to buriall 2. The very sight of the torne and bloudy garment did augment his griefe as the very sight of Caesars garment wherein he was killed moved the people to be revenged upon those that murdered him and Iulia the wife of Pompey when she saw his garment sprinkled with bloud at the sight thereof swouned away and died Perer. ex Dion 3. Iacob continued twenty two or twenty three years mourning and lamenting for Ioseph for now he was seventeene yeare old but when Iacob heard tell that he was living in Egypt he was 39. yeare old for he was 30. yeares of age when he stood before Pharaoh and after that seven yeares of plenty were past and two yeares of famine 4. This extremity of griefe caused Iacob outwardly to testifie the same first by the renting of his cloaths which afterward did grow into use and custome to shew the great sorrow and indignation of minde as Caleb and Iosua rent their clothes Numb 14.6 when they heard the murmuring of the people and Paul and Barnabas when the people would have offered sacrifice unto them Perer.
a brother for the word is used first in this place where it so signifieth from hence then the originall sense of the word must be taken 3. The words of the law are If brethren dwell together now naturall brethren and such as are properly so called are more like to dwell together than kinsmen removed who in a large sense are so called brethren 4. This law is so interpreted in the Gospell where it appeareth by the Sadduces question of seven brethren that successively tooke the one the others wife Matth. 22. that it was so practised 5. It is the opinion of Philo and the Hebrewes as we heard before who are best acquainted with their owne lawes that naturall brethren used so to doe 4. Now the objections on the contrary part are easily answered 1. It is objected that Levit. 18.16 the brother is forbidden to marry his brothers wife Answ. This is a particular exception from that generall law that unlesse in this case onely to raise seed to the brother it was utterly unlawfull to take the brothers widow which was not to uncover her shame but rather to take away her shame in that shee remained childlesse by his brother and it was honourable to the dead in reviving his memory So wee see in other cases that the Lord made some particular exception from his generall lawes As the making of the Cherubims over the Arke was an instance against the second commandement the Israelites robbing of the Egyptians against the eighth commandement Phinehes killing of the adulterer and adulteresse against the sixth commandement 2. Ob. The practice of this law as appeareth Ruth 4. where Boaz not a brother but a kinsman taketh the wife of the dead sheweth the meaning thereof Answ. We deny not but where there was no brother nearer there the next kinsman further off did the duty of the brother and so was it practised upon Ruth 3. Ob. Iohn Baptist simply reproveth Herod because he tooke his brothers wife It is not lawfull for thee saith Iohn to have thy brothers wife Mark 6.18 Answ. It is certaine that Herods brother had issue by his wife Herodias whose daughter danced before Herod and therefore in this case it was not lawfull so that Herod tooke not Herodias for any such purpose to raise seed to his brother but of an immoderate lust 4. Ob. Why then should it not be lawfull still in this case to marry the brothers wife dying without issue Answ. This law of Moses was partly ceremoniall and typicall in preserving the right of the first-borne whereby was prefigured the spirituall birth-right in the Messiah which never should have end partly politicall in maintaining the distinction of families in their tribes whereof the ceremonie is now abolished which onely concerned that people Iun. in Deut. 25. vers 5. QUEST VIII Whether Thamar or Iudahs sinne was greater COncerning this act of incontinencie which Iudah committed with Thamar 1. We refuse the opinion of Rab. Simeon who altogether exempteth Thamar from any fault because she onely desired issue for the hope of the Messiah to be borne of Iudah for this mystery was not as yet revealed Perer. 2. It is certaine that Iudahs sinne was greater than Thamars both in that he brake promise with her concerning Selah as also in that he companied with her not for any issue but carnall lust though he were afterward preferred before his brethren this no more excuseth his fault than if Davids adultery joyned with murther should bee defended because hee was preferred before his brethren of whose seed the Messiah should come 3. Thamars sinne was lesse than Iudahs yet a sinne as Augustine noteth Non eam justificatam sed magis quam se justificatam dicens Iudah saith She was not righteous but more righteous than he lib. 22. cont Faust. cap. 62. Yet her fault is extenuated by these circumstances as Ambrose noteth Non alienum praeripuit thorum She did not usurpe upon anothers bed she stayed till Iudah was a widower she did it not of an inordinate lust Sed successionis gratia concupivit She onely desired to have issue Et ex ea familia quam delegerat And by that family which she had chosen and further after she knew her selfe to be conceived with childe she put on her widowes garments againe and so continued 4. Yet Thamars sin in some respect was greater than Iudahs because she wittingly committed incest with her father in law but Iudah ignorantly Luther Notwithstanding all circumstances considered Iudahs fault was the greater and so he doth justifie her in respect of himselfe 5. But whereas Ambrose further noteth that shee stayed till Selah to whom she was espoused was dead therein is an errour for vers 14. it is given as a reason why Thamar attempted this thing because Selah was now growne and of age and she yet not given unto him he was then at this time alive Beside Selah is numbred among those sons of Iudah that went downe with Iacob into Egypt and onely Er and Onan of Iacobs sonnes are said to have died in the land of Canaan Gen. 46.12 ex Perer. QUEST IX How it came to passe that Iudah discerned not Thamar by her voice Vers. 15. HE judged her to be an whore for she had covered her face c. 1. Not as some reade she had coloured or painted her face whom Aben Ezra doth not without cause reprove 2. Neither is this a reason why Iudah did thinke she was an harlot because she was vailed as Iunius Calvin for harlots use not to be so modest but it is given as a reason why Iudah did not know her Mercer 3. And whereas it may seeme strange that Iudah did not know her by her voice the reason is that being wholly given over to lust and intending no other thing he greatly regarded not the sight of his eyes or hearing of his eares Luther As also it was a just judgement of God upon him to strike him with such a stupidity as not to discerne her Mercer Geneven QUEST X. Whether Iudâ—h were a Iudge Vers. 24. BRing her forth and let her be burnt c. 1. Iudah giveth not sentence against Thamar either as being appointed a Prince and Judge among the Canaanites as Tostatus Cajetanus for it is not like they would suffer a stranger to be a Judge and ruler among them as the Sodomites answer Lot Gen. 19.9 neither as chiefe in the familie had he power of life and death over those of his charge as some thinke for neither doe we reade that any father of families did execute any such justice in their families and Iacob was the chiefe father of these families and therefore it is most like that Iudah giveth advice that Thamar should be brought forth to the place of justice and proceeded against according to the custome and law of that Country Mercer Iun. 2. But whereas she is adjudged to the fire this was not because she was Melchisedecks daughter the Lords high
Priest as the Hebrewes imagine for he died ten yeares before Iacob was borne who was now above 100. yeare old and therefore Melchisedeck could not have a daughter so young to beare children neither was this punishment arbitrary in Iudah and inflicted without law according to his pleasure Burgens for Iudah had no such authority there nor yet as Lyranus and Tostatus was she worthy of the fire because she had committed not simple fornication but adultery because she was by law obliged to the third brother and so in a manner espoused for it was not adultery for the widow of the brother to marrie with some other than the surviving brother else Naomi would never have advised her daughters in law to get them other husbands in their owne Countrey Ruth 1.9 But I rather thinke that Thamars adultery was in this that she had played the whore whereas Iudah had betrothed and espoused her to Selah and that Iudah who never was minded to give Selah to Thamar fearing lest he might die also as is evident vers 11. was very forward to take this occasion to be rid of Thamar that Selah might not marrie her 3. But herein appeareth Iudahs too much rigour and injustice that before the matter was examined gave sentence and was partiall the truth being knowne in his owne cause and further it was a savage part to put to death a woman great with childe which is contrary both to divine and humane lawes for it is written Deut. 24.16 The fathers shall not bee put to death for the children nor the children for the fathers but if Thamar had now died the infant had died with her The Romans had a law that the execution of a woman with childe should be deferred till she had brought forth the same also was practised among the Athenians Aeltan lib. 5. And therefore Claudius the Emperour is noted for his cruelty that spared not to put to death women with childe Perer. ex Dion lib. 57. QUEST XI Wherefore the Midwife useth a red threed and what colour it was of Vers. 28. THe midwife bound a red threed c. 1. It is so rather to be read than with Oleaster a twine or double threed the word sani here used commeth indeed of sanah that signifieth to double which is rather to be referred to the double die and colour than the double matter Iun. Tostatus also is much deceived here that taketh it not for a red but a blacke colour twice died ex Perer. 3. The Midwife tied this red threed as a marke of the first-borne because he first put forth his hand and the purple colour very well agreeth to the birth-right or eldership Muscul. QUEST XII Whence Pharez was so called and whereof he is a type Vers. 29. HOw hast thou broken thy breach upon thee 1. Hierome is deceived that of this word pharatz that signifieth to breake or divide thinketh the Pharises to have taken denomination whereas they had their name rather of Pharas which signifieth to disperse or separate because they were separate from other in profession of life and their apparell Mercer 2. This story hath bin diversly allegorized by the fathers some by Pharez understand the beleeving Gentiles by Zarah the Israelites and by the red threed their bloudy circumcision sacrifices sic Iren. Cyril Some contrariwise will have Phares to signifie the Jewes Zarah the beleeving Gentiles Chrysost. 3. But this Phares is more fitly a type and figure of Christ who hath broken downe the partition wall and hath broken the power of hell and death Mercer And by this strange and extraordinary birth the Lord would have Iudah and Thamar admonished of the sin which they had committed and to be humbled thereby though he in his mercie had forgiven it Calvin 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The difference betweene the apparelling of widowes and wives Vers. 14. SHe put her widowes garment off c. It seemeth that it was the use in those dayes for widowes to be knowne from wives by their mourning and grave apparell in which case more is permitted to women that are married whom the Apostle alloweth to adorne themselves with comely and sober apparell without pride or excesse 1 Timoth. 2.9 to please and content their husbands but widowes having no husbands to whose liking they should apparell themselves ought not to decke themselves to please other mens eyes Luther 2. Doct. Friendship ought alwayes to be joyned with pietie Vers. 20. IVdah sent a kid by the hand of his friend This Hâ—rah Iudahs friend did performe an evill office in being as it were a broker for Iudah who should neither have requested any dishonest or uncomely thing of his friend nor the other yeelded unto it love truth and piety ought not to be separated as Saint Iohn saith Whom I love in the truth Epist. 3.1 Muscul. 3. Doct. Adultery in former times punished by death Vers. 24. LEt her bee burnt We see that even among the Canaanites adultery was judged worthy of death for Iudah inventeth no new kinde of punishment but speaketh according to the law and custome of that Countrey So the Lord himselfe said to Abimelech that had taken Sarai unto him Behold thou art but a dead man for this c. Gen. 20.3 Now although this law as peculiar to that Countrey bindeth not now neither in respect of the kinde of death for by Moses law onely the Priests daughter if she played the whore was burned Levit. 21.9 the rest were stoned nor yet in the inequality of the law for the women offending were burned the men escaped as appeareth in Iudah Calvin whereas both adulterers and adulteresses are alike guilty and though then there was greater cause of keeping their seed uncorrupt for preserving of their lives and the distinction of families in which respect it may be thought somewhat of the former rigour and severity may be abated yet this example condemneth the security and connivence of magistrates in these dayes in the punishing of this sinne when as faults of lesse nature are more severely censured than adultery And whereas the president of our Saviour is urged by some for the mitigation of the punishment of adultery because he would not condemne the woman taken in adulterie it doth not serve their turne for this mercie Christ shewed not to cleare or exempt the adulteresse leaving her to the magistrate but partly to shew that he came not to be a judge in such causes as neither in other like businesses as dividing of the inheritance Luk. 12.14 partly by this example he would teach what is to be required in the person of an accuser not to bee guilty of that crime whereof he accuseth others 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. That it is not lawfull upon any occasion to marrie the brothers wife Vers. 8. GOe into thy brothers wife Because in this place as also Deut. 25.5 it is permitted to naturall brethren to marry the wives of their brother deceased Bellarmine
that time in great want but there is no necessitie to live ex Perer. QUEST IX Why Ioseph advised to have the fift part taken Vers. 34. TAke up the fift part of the land c. 1. Hee meaneth the fift part of the fruits of the land which was done at the Kings charge for it is not like that he tooke away the fift part from the owners though afterward it was made a law but it was bought with the Kings money Mercer Iun. 2. Raâ—i following Oukelos readeth let them defend the land of Egypt against the famine by setting the people a worke to gather the corne because the word is so taken Exod. 13.18 where it is said the Israelites came up armed girt under the fift rib but this reading is improper and that the fift part is understood appeareth by the law of the fift part reserved to Pharaoh Gen. 47.24 3. The fift part was thought sufficient for it is like beside that other rich men following the Kings president laid up some what in store also and in the yeare of famine somewhat might grow though not much and they made greater spare in the time of scarcitie Perer. Mercer 4. Iosephs prudence appeareth in preserving the corne so long for seven yeares which was not done by using sand and quicksilver as Ramban supposeth but as Philo well conjectureth by laying up the corne in the straw for by this meanes it would keepe long sweet and the poore might be imployed in threshing of it out as also they had straw for their cattell Perer. ex Philon. QUEST X. Of the ring fine linnen and other ensignes of Iosephs honour Vers. 42. PHaraoh tooke off his ring c. 1. Plinie is here in an errour that the use of rings came not up before the Trojane warre whereas Ioseph was honoured of Pharaoh with a ring who was six hundred yeare before the ruine of Troy Likewise the same author saith that the Egyptians used no rings to seale with lib. 33. c. 1. Whereas it is most like that Pharaoh gave this ring to Ioseph for that use as Assuerus gave Haman his ring to seale letters in the Kings name Esther 3.9 2. It is like that Ioseph went apart till Pharaoh had consulted with his Nobles who all by their silence gave consent that Ioseph was the fittest man 3. These then were the ensignes of Iosephs honour the King giveth him a ring then he is araied with fine linen or white silke whereof there was great store in Egypt which was made of certaine cotten or bombasine that came of the Gosipon tree called Xilinon Iun. Perer. The third signe of honour was a golden chaine which was in great request afterward among the Romans the fourth was Iosephs riding in the second chariot appointed for him that was the Viceroy next in authoritie to the King Assuerus caused Mordechai in token of honour of the Kings favour to ride upon his horse Esther 6. And in the same place Mordechai is adorned with the like ornaments as with royall apparell and a princely diadem and proclamation to be made before him as was here before Ioseph So King Balthazar promiseth the like reward to him that could interpret the writing that he should be clothed with purple and should have a chaine of gold about his necke and be the third ruler in the kingdome Dan. 5.7 QUEST X. The great authoritie committed to Ioseph Vers. 44. I Am Pharaoh c. 1. This is not an oath as some think that Pharaoh sweareth by his honour but he onely reserveth unto himselfe the Kingly name and majestie as before vers 40. onely in this throne will I be above thee 2. In that he saith none shall lift up his hand without thee it is to be understood not of private but of the publike affaires of the kingdome Mercer 3. The Hebrewes here note that as Ioseph before humbled himselfe and said without me shall God make answer to Pharaoh so now he is exalted and Pharaoh saith without thee shall no man lift up his hand c. QUEST XI Of the change of Iosephs name and the signification of it Vers. 45. PHaraoh called Iosephs name Zaphnath-paaneah c. 1. These are neither Hebrew words as Ramban thinketh for although the first may be derived from tsaphan which signifieth to hide yet the originall of the other in the Hebrew tongue cannot be found Mercer Hierome thinketh it signifieth Saviour of the world in the Egyptian tongue whom Eugubinus followeth but it is most like that it signifieth the revealer of secrets as Iosephus Oukelos the Septuag Some thinke he was a Prince rather as the Chalde translateth than Priest of On because the priests of all other were most superstitious Iun. This On was not the Citie No mentioned Ezech. 30.16 which is Alexandria but rather Heliopolis as Hierome the chiefe Citie of the regiment of Heliopolis Ptolemie calleth Onium 4. Asenath cannot be the daughter of Dina Iacobs daughter as the Hebrewes dreame being an Egyptian woman Ioseph marieth the daughter of an Idolater because he could not take a wife of his fathers kindred being in a strange countrey so also did Iacob marrie Labans daughter that was an Idolater and Moses a Madianitish woman whom afterward they converted to the true worship of God as Ioseph did his wife and this might well be a type and figure of the calling of the Idolatrous Gentiles Mercer QUEST XII Potiphars Whether two of that name THe daughter of Potipherah 1. We refuse here the opinion of Hierome that thinketh this Potiphar to have beene the same whom Ioseph before served and we hold that to be one of the fables of the Hebrewes that this Potiphar Iosephs master having a purpose to use Ioseph to incontinencie was stricken of God with drinesse and withering in his secret parts and afterward became a Priest 2. I rather preferre Augustines judgement who upon these reasons rather thinketh that this was a divers Potiphar from the other 1. Because it had beene much for Iosephs honour that his master whose servant he was did now bestow upon him his daughter and therefore Moses would not have concealed it 2. The other Potiphar is the Captaine of Pharaohs souldiers this Priest of On two offices much unlike 3. This On or Heliopolis was about twentie miles distant from Memphis the Kings Citie but the other Potiphar was a continuall officer in Pharaohs house thus Augustine qu. 136. in Gen. 3. Chrysostome thinketh that they were two divers men but of one name hom 63. in Gen. But it is evident that their names also differ for the first is called Potiphar the second with the letter ain in the end Potipherang besides it is not like that Ioseph would marrie the daughter of that adulteresse and wanton woman whose evill manners hee had experience of Mercer Muscul. QUEST XIII To what end mention was made of Iosephs are Vers. 46. IOseph was thirty yeares old c. Mention is made of the
Moses fled but an other and that this was the fourth change during his exile Orâ—s reigned 38. yeeres in whose latter yeeres Moses fled then after him succeeded Acengerâ—s 12. yeeres thâ—n Achâ—rus 9. yeeres then Câ—nâ—hres 16. yeeres who perished in the red sea Simler 2. But it is more probable that this Pharaoh that now died was that King from whom Moses escaped both for that the Israelites now at the change of the King cried unto God hoping to finde some alteration as men commonly doe looke for better times at the change of the Prince Pellican As also so much may be gathered by that which the Lord saith to Moses goe returne to Egypt for they are all dead which went about to kill thee that is both Pharaoh and all those that sought to revenge the Egyptians bloud whom Moses slew Iun. Iosephus also thinketh that this was the same Pharaoh from whom Moses fled unto Midian lib. 2. cap. 5. QUEST XXXIV Whether the cry of the Israelites proceeded from true repentance Vers. 23. ANd the children of Israel sighed for the bondage and cried 1. Some thinke that this crie of the Israelites proceeded not from any true repentance but from their present miserie and bondage And God heard their crie of his fatherlie pitic and clemencie as he often heareth the complaints of those which are worthily punished so the Lord had respect to Ahabs sackcloth and semblance of sorrow 2. But it is rather to bee thought that the afflictions of the Israelites had brought them to the knowledge of their sinne and specially of their Idolatrie which is mentioned by the Prophet Ezechi 20.8 And thus being humbled with fight of their sinnes for the which they were worthily chastised they make their complaint unto God Iun. Simler And this may appeare by their effectuall prayers which went up to heaven as proceeding from great contrition of heart and humilitie Ferus Wherefore Moses also maketh further mention Num. 20.16 shewing that at the instant humble suite of the Israelites the Lord sent his Angell to deliver them Iun. This crie therefore of the Israelites in Egypt seemeth to be unlike unto that which they made when the Egyptians pursued them they are said to crie unto God in one verse and to murmur in the next Exod. 14.10.11 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Of the divine providence Vers. 3. SHe tooke for him an Arke In Moses wonderfull preservation we have a notable example of the divine providence which sheweth that all things in the world are governed ordered and disposed according to the will of God the hiding of Moses three moneths his putting into a close Arke the finding of it by Pharaohs daughter the instinct which she had to bring him up for her owne sonne by which meanes Moses came to be instructed in the Egyptian learning doe all excellently set forth the fatherly care of God toward his in their birth education preservation as our Saviour also saith even all the haires of your head are numbred Matth. 10.30 Piscator 2. Doct. Lawfull meanes to be used THey â—â—bed it with sâ—ime and pitch Although they chiefly commended the childe by a sure faith to Gods providence yet they refuse no meanes to provide for the childs safetie like as Noah pitched his Arke within and without which teacheth us that we should so depend upon Gods providence as that we presume not but carefully use the meanes which God hath appointed Pellican 3. Doct. Difference of punishment according to the diversitie of sinne Vers. 13. HE said unto him that smote his brother Wherefore sâ—itest thou thy fellow Moses wisdome and discretion herein appeareth that killed the Egyptian reproveth onely the Hebrew so they which sinne maliciously are more severely to bee punished than they which offend of ignorance and infirmitie Ferus 4. Doct. That it is lawfull to flee in time of persecution Vers. 15. MOses fled from Pharaoh This sheweth that it is lawfull for onâ— to flie in the time of persecution specially when his person is sought so Iacob fled from Esau. David from Saul Paul escaped out of Damascus Bâ—rrh 5. Places of controversie 1. Cont. The mariage of the aunt and nephew against the law of nature Vers. 1. A Man of Levi tooke a daughter of Levi. That is Amram tooke to wife Iochebed his fathers sister as is before shewed quest 3. The Canonists upon these and such other examples of neere mariages doe inferre that by the law of nature no degrees are forbidden but betweene father and daugter mother and sonne onely because in other neere degrees even mariages were in use among the Patriarkes Contr. 1. It appeareth that these mariages as to take the Aunt to wife or uncle to husband to marrie two sisters and such like were even against the law of nature seeing they are named among the abominations and pollutions of the Cananites Levit. 18.27 who transgressed nor here in against any positive or judiciall law but against the law of nature 2. This further is made manifest in that the Romanes by the light of nature and some other nations did prohibite such neere mariages and conjunctions 3. And the fathers acts and examples doe not therefore conclude that the prohibition of such mariages was not morall naturall for it cannot be denied but in their owne opinion Lots incest with his daughters was unnaturall the law of nature in many things was then obscured which afterward by the positive lawes was explained Simler in cap. 6. Exod. 2. Cont. That the mariage of ministers is lawfull Vers. 16. ANd the Priest of Median had seven daughters Râ—hâ—el himselfe was a Priest and so was the son Iethro who offered sacrifices unto God Exod. 16. So that even among the Gentiles the Priests were married and the sonnes succeeded the parents in their Priestly function As in the primitive Church we read of Polycrates who in an Epistle to Victor writeth that seven of his auncestors had beene Bishops of Ephesus before him and he himselfe was the eighth The Apostles also were married and S. Paul also sheweth that he might have taken this libertie as well as the rest 1 Cor. 9.5 and he alloweth every man to have his wife 1 Cor. 7.2 3. Cont. Of the authoritie of parents in the mariage of their children Vers. 22. WHo gave unto Moses Zipporah his daughter Here that ancient right of the fathers in disposing and giving their children in mariage is confirmed Piscatur So Abraham provided a wife for Isaack Rebeckah is given by her parents they onely aske her consent Gen. 24. It was in the fathers power to ratifie or disanull the vow and promise made by the daughter Numb 30. This maketh against the practice of the Canonists and Romanists that ascribe very little to the consent of parents in marriage and they allow that a mans sonne or daughter may against the minde of the parents be pulled into a Cloister and professe Monkerie 4. Cont. Of the perfection of the Hebrew
21.22 2. The divers readings Vers. 7. Because of their exactors I.V.A.P.S. rather than taskmasters B.G. The word is derived of Nagash to exact oppresse Vers. 12. For I will be with thee I.V.A.P.S.B. rather than I will be with thee L. for here the causall particle for is wanting or Certainly I will be with thee G. chi signifieth for because This shall be a token unto thee that I have sent thee when thou has brought c. ye shall serve God upon this mountaine I.S.A.P. that is this vision which thou seest shall be a signe not as the most reade That this shall be a signe namely that which followeth and shall serve me G.B.V.L. for the perfect distinction athuah commeth betweene and that could not properly be a signe to confirme him presently which was to be fulfilled afterward Vers. 14. Eâ—ich which am hath sent me I. to whom consenteth Simlerus rather than I am that I am V. LS.B.G.X or I shall be what I shall be A.P. The first Ehich seemeth to be a proper name because God answereth directly to Moses question who was desirous to know his name the second Ehich is an interpretation of the former and not part of the name because that Ehich is but once repeated in the end of the verse Ehich signifieth properly I shall be but it is usuall with the Hebrewes to put the future for the preter tense Ehich hath sent me that is I am B.G.V. I shall be A.P. rather than he that is hath sent me L.S. for Ehich is the first person of the future of hajah to be Vers. 18. They shall hearken to thy voice I rather than heare thy voice V.L.S.B. or obey thy voice G.A.P. for then the preposition Lamed which signifieth to should be superfluous Vers. 18. The God of the Hebrewes hath met with us I.V.B.G. cum caeter rather than hath called us S. L. for the word is Karah with he to meete or come against not Kara with aleph which signifieth to call Vers. 19. The King of Egypt will not let you goe yea not by strong hand I.V.A. rather than he will not let you goe but by strong hand L.S.B.G. the word is Velo yea not or and not the meaning is that hee will be so obstinate that he will not a great while let you goe though he feele Gods mighty hand Vers. 22. And ye shall spoile Egypt or the Egyptians I.G.S.L. better than robbe the Egyptians B. Naâ—zal in Piel signifieth to take the spoile as 2. Chron. 20.25 They tooke the spoile to themselves 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. How long Moses kept his father in lawes sheepe what he did in the meane time and to what end he was so exercised Vers. 1. WHen Moses kept the sheepe 1. Concerning the time when this vision here following was shewed to Moses it fell out 40. yeeres after he fled out of Egypt Acts 7.30 about the 80. yeere of his age for so old he was when Moses appeared before Pharaoh Exod. 7.7 which was the same yeere Perer. 2. so that Moses kept his father in lawes sheepe the space of 40. yeeres for he was 40. yeeres old when he visited his brethren Acts 7.23 and now he was 80. yeere old wherein appeareth the singular patience of Moses that was brought ab aula ad caulam from the court as it were to the carte and in this state of life continued forty yeeres Simlerus During which time it is supposed that he wrote the Booke of Genesis and the Booke of Iob for the comfort of his afflicted brethren in Egypt But it is very like that hee gave himselfe to contemplation and much profited in the study of wisedome the grounds whereof he had learned in Egypt Perer. ex Philone 3. And thus it pleased God to exercise Moses in a shepheards life for these causes 1. That by this meanes he might fully bee weaned from the pleasures of Egypt and as it were renounce the world Perer. ex Gregor 2. The pastorall life and discipline was a kinde of introduction to prepare him for the governement which afterward hee tooke upon him as it is in the Psalme Thou didst leade thy people like sheepe by the hand of Moses and Aaron 3. that Gods power might appeare in raising Moses from this contemptible kind of life especially in the opinion of the Egyptians that abhorred all keepers of sheepe to that high place calling and authority to the which he was afterward advanced Simler QUEST II. Of the mount Choreb whether the same with Sinai HE came to the mountaine of God Choreb 1. Iosephus thinketh that mount Choreb and Sinai were all one some thinke they were two mountaines joyning together and that Sinai was the higher Cajetane thinketh that Choreb was the top of the mount Sinai but it is more like that Choreb was the name of that hilly trace or circuit so called of the drinesse or barrennesse wherein the mount Sinai was situated which place as Philo thinketh was full of bushes and that at the bottome of that bushie hill this vision was shewed 2. Moses drave his sheepe thither because there was good store of grasse by reason that the hill was unfrequented because of the reverence and holinesse of the place but the place was not had in such reverence before this vision therefore it is most like that he went thither as to a secret place and more fit for contemplation and that to him thus prepared this heavenly vision appeared Simler Or the Lord might by a secret instinct draw Moses thither where hee purposed to manifest himselfe unto him Perer. 3. It is called the mountaine of God not for any religion which was there placed of old as Iosephus or because of the height and excellencie thereof as such things are so called in Scripture as the cedars of God Psalm 104.16 But it is so named by an anticipation because there the Lord did appeare to Moses at this time and afterward shewed himselfe by visible signe at the delivering of the Law Iun. 4. This hill is famous in Scripture for seven memorable things there done as the vision of the fire in the bush the striking of the rock with Moses rod there Moses lift up his hands when Ioshua prevailed against Amalek there the Law was given Moses fasted fourty dayes and fourty nights and comming downe from thence broke the tables of stone there Helias had that admirable vision set forth 1. Kin. 19. Perer. QUEST III. Of the vision in the bush Vers. 2. THen the Angell of the Lord appeared unto him in a flame of fire cut of the mids of the bush 1. This is one of the three most notable visions of the old Testament the two other were the vision of the ladder shewed to Iacob Gen. 28. The other of the ancient of dayes unto Dan. 7. Pereâ— But unto these may be added as not inferiour to the rest the appearing of the Lord in
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 enchanters R. Levi taketh them to be those which by naturall meanes seeme to doe strange things while their craft is not perceived as here they seeme to make serpents of rods R. Saadias would derive it of chor and atam which signifieth an hole and secret because they did hide in secret holes and places as in graves those whom they consulted with and which gave answer unto them but this seemeth to be curious The fourth word is lahate of lahat which signifieth fire or the blade of a sword as Gen. 3.24 because Magicians use not onely words to enchant with but other instruments Aben Ezra But their enchantments are rather so called because they deceive men making them to take one thing for another as the fight is easily deceived in shaking of a bright sword Borrh. QUEST VIII Of the divers kindes of magick BEsides these here named there were other kindes of Magick as Plinie rehearseth divers as how they divined by water by the aire by the starres by basons shadowes talke with the dead lib. 30. c. 11.2 Augustine out of Proclus and Porphyrius sheweth that they made two kindes of Magick the one was thourgia which by certaine sacrifices and a fained purity of the body and by other rites did invocate as they thought the good spirits the other was called goetia because they used mourning in invocating of spirits and Necromantia because they consulted with the dead 3. Suidas maketh three sorts Mâ—gia art Magicke which was by invocating of the spirits for the effecting of some good worke as they were made to beleeve Goetia which by mourning called upon the spirits of the dead Pharmacia when they used or applied any venomous or poysoned thing Ex Perer. 4. But to know the divers devilish devices which Magicians used we can have no better direction than from the Scripture it selfe Deut. 18.10 Where beside these two kindes before rehearsed of jidgeni the wisard and casheph the Jugler or deceiver there are six more magicall practices set downe The first is Kasam the diviner 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Septuagint such as tooke upon them to tell of things which were lost and to declare hid matters and things to come such as divined by visions as Micah 3.6 The next is meghonen an observer of times Planetarius a Planetary such as by the aspect of the starres moving of the cloudes and by such like tooke upon them to prognosticate not of naturall things but of civill and humane affaires so is the word used Isai. 2.6 They are Southsayers as the Philistims and what the Philistims were we may read 1. Sam. 6. who by the going of the cart and by the way it tooke did take upon them to finde out the author of the plagues that were sent upon them the Septuagint reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 such as observe words and use spels The third is nachash an Augur or Conjecturer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 such as by the flying of birds or such like doe make conjectures as they that count the crossing of a hare the way ominous and such like The fourth is casheph the plurall whereof is cashphim deceivers touched before The fift is chober chaber the Inchanter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Septuagint that useth inchantment as it is expounded by another word Psal. 58.6 lachash which signifieth to mutter or whisper such as take upon them to charme Serpents and adjure Devils and to doe great cures by hanging inchanted things about the necke or such like the word chabar signifieth to joyne because such have a league and conjunction with evill spirits The sixt is shoel obh that asketh of familiars 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ventriloquus Septuagint that give answers as though a spirit or familiar spake within them for obh signifieth a bottle or the belly swelling and puffed up and ready to brast as Iob. 22.20 The seventh is jâ—dgoni the Wisard spoken of before The eight is doresh el hamethim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that inquireth of the dead such as make men beleeve they can raise up the dead to consult with them whereas it is the Devill in their likenesse as the witch of Endor brought up the Devill in likenesse of Samuel 1. Sam. 28. QUEST IX Of the first author and inventor of art Magick Vers. 11. THese Charmers of Egypt Though Egypt was much given to this devilish invention of Magicke yet neither were they the first founders nor the onely professors of it 1. Most Writers doe make Zoroastres of Persia the author of it as Plinie and Diogenes Laertius Iustinus Plinie writeth of him that hee only of all men that ever were laughed the same day hee was borne and his braine so moved up and downe that it would remove or put off the hand laid upon it which they say was a signe of his great and mysticall knowledge the author of the Scholasticall history saith that this Zoroastres was Ninus who wrote this art Magicke and the seven liberall Arts in fourteene pillars seven of brasse and seven of bricke to preserve them from the destruction of the world one by water the other by fire 2. Concerning the antiquity of Zoroastres hee was neither so ancient as some write that hee was 600. yeeres elder than Plato or five thousand yeeres before the battell of Troy as Hermippus as Laertius citeth him nor yet was he so late as Xantus Lydius maketh him to be but six hundred yeeres before Xerxes expedition into Greece For Zoroastres was in the time of Ninus when Abraham lived from whose birth to the first Olympiad are counted 1268. yeeres and the battell of Troy was 407. yeeres before the beginning of the Olympiades But Xerxes passage into Greece followeth in the 75. Olympiade and Plato his death in the 108 Olympiade by this it is evident that Zoroastres was neither so many yeeres before the first nor so few as the rest imagine 3. But Cassianus deriveth the first invention of Magicke from before the floud for whereas Adam having the knowledge of the celestiall bodies and elements taught the same unto Seth which kinde of knowledge continued uncorrupt in the righteous seed till they joyned in marriage with the posterity of Cain then they abused and prophaned the same to the finding out of superstitious and Magicall devices which wicked inventions they say were preserved by Cain and by him graven in certaine plates of mettall sic Cassianus collat 8. cap. 21. So these devilish practises continued along and were dispersed in the world they were rice in Canaan in Moses time as may appeare by the Lawes made against such in divers places but especially Deut. 18.10 And afterward about the time of the Trojane warre these Magicall studies were much followed as Homers fable of Circes sheweth Orpheus among the Thessalians and Osthanes that accompanied Xerxes in his warre against Greece were famous in this kind Pythagoras and after him Empedocles Democritus Plato seemed to make great account of
it may be understood of Moses and Aaron who were Gods messengers for so Angell signifieth or else they are called Angels of evill i. of poenal not morall evill rather than evill Angels And though they would seeme to gather by those words chap. 12.23 The Lord will not suffer the destroyer to come into your houses that this Angell of himselfe had a desire to invade the people of God and therefore was not a good Angell yet that followeth not but the words rather shew thus much that the Angell being sent forth by the Lord was to doe all things according to his direction to strike where God bid him strike and to forbeare where the Lord purposed to spare 4. Wherefore as the good Angels were the ministers of the former plagues as is shewed before quest 30. in chap. 7. so they are to be held to be the Lords instrument in this Pâ—rer QUEST IV. Whether one Angell or many were used in this destruction ANd for the number of these destroying Angels 1. Though it be said in the singular number chap. 12.23 the destroyer yet it followeth not that one Angell should be the minister for it is usuall in Scripture to put the singular for the plurall 2. Therefore it is more probable that many Angels were imployed in this service not in respect of the multitude that were slaine for in the host of Senacherib one Angell slew 180. thousand nor of the distance of place for one Angell in Davids time smote 70000. in three dayes space from Dan to Beersheba but in regard of the time because all the first borne of Egypt were slaine at midnight about the same time it is like that many Angels in divers places of Egypt were sent of God to strike the first borne Perer. Cajetan QUEST V. Vpon whom this plague in the smiting of the first borne was executed Vers. 5. ALl the first borne in the land of Egypt shall die All the first borne of every house as the chiefe and principall were smitten with death even from the Kings throne unto the sonne of the poore servant that ground at the mill which they used in the day to doe such servile works and in the night time kept them in hold and therefore it is said chap. 12.29 unto the first borne of the captive that was in prison So Samson did grind at the mill being in prison Iudg. 16. 2. Beside all the first borne of their beasts were slaine that is of their domesticall cattell for wilde beasts must be here excepted which were not in their power and such cattell as bring forth many at once where there is no difference betweene the firstlings and the rest Perer. 3. The third effect of this plague was that God did execute his judgements upon the gods and Idols of Egypt chap. 12.12 QUEST VI. Whether in every house the first borne were slaine BUt here this doubt ariseth concerning the first borne because it is said afterward chap. 12.30 that there was no house wherein there was not one dead whether in every house there were a first borne 1. Ab. Ezra thinketh all to be understood for the greater part 2. Simler for the houses of every sort both of high and low as the King and captive are named 3. Hugo S. Victor doth thus interpret it that in every house where was any first borne there was one slaine But it seemeth that no house at all was excepted because all the Israelites were commanded to strike the bloud upon the posts of their dores to escape the plague 4. Therefore Augustine thinketh that God so disposed at this time by his divine providence that every house of the Egyptians had one first borne quest 44. in Exod. But we need not run unto miracles where another exposition may be found 5. Thostatus thinketh that the first borne is here taken for the first borne of the feminine sex as well as of the males whether their parents were alive or dead whether they were the first borne by the husband or wife But the name of first borne is not thus taken in scripture neither yet is it like that any females died but males as it may appeare by the law of the first borne that are made holy unto God upon this occasion because the Lord for Israels sake killed all the first borne of Egypt there onely the males that first open the wombe are set apart chap. 13.12 6. Therefore of all the â—est I preferre the exposition of Iunius that in every house either the first or if there were no first borne the next principall man was taken in stead of the first borne so also Cajetane QUEST VII Why the Lord destroyeth the first borne NOw the first borne were slaine 1. Because they oppressed Israel whom the Lord calleth his first borne Exod. 4. Theodoret. 2. Rather because they put to death the first borne children of Israel yea all the males therefore the Lord doth worthily punish them in their first borne Ferus 3. And this plague was ordained for them more grievous than all the rest for what can come neerer a man than the death of his first borne which also may bee his onely borne as Abraham could not have a greater triall than when he was commanded to sacrifice his onely sonne Isaack that the Egyptians should be forced by this last and greatest plague to let Israel goe Perer. 4. Neither was this unjust in God to take away the life of infants who are not innocent before God and the Lord that gave them life may take it away if it more serve unto his glory And the parents also that had sinned were punished herein by the death of their dearest children being themselves reserved for a greater destruction Simler QUEST VIII Why the first borne of the cattell also are destroyed THe Egyptians cattell also are killed 1. because this losse also was a punishment unto the Egyptians for whose use they served Simler 2. And much of their substance also consisted in cattell Perer. so that both they lost part of their substance and wanted the use of them 3. Beside the Egyptians oppressed the Israelites and wronged them in their cattell Ferus 4. The Hebrewes also thinke this was one speciall cause for that the Egyptians did superstitiously adore divers kinds of cattell and therefore for detestation of their Idolatrie the cattell are punished QUEST IX How the Gods of the Egyptians were judged NOw what gods of Egypt were judged is diversly scanned 1. Some thinke that by gods the Magistrates and Judges are understood Osiander But this was said before that the first borne should be killed even from the Princes throne this was a punishment to Pharaoh and all his great men to have their first borne cut off 2. Some thinke that the Egyptian gods were judged in that their worshippers were punished Borrh. 3. Others that the Temples of the Idols were cast downe Hierom and their Idols throwne downe and beaten to dust as the Hebrewes 4. Some that
stocke of Iesse and of the graft that should grow out of his root Isay 11.1 who should make our bitter waters sweet as he saith Come unto me all that labour and I will refresh you Borrh. 3. It signifieth also that our bitter afflictions by faith are made easie and pleasant which remaine bitter sowre and tart Nisi fide adhibeamus ad lignum crucis Christi Vnlesse we doe apply by faith the wood of Christs crosse that iâ— beleeve in his death Osiander So also Augustine Praefigurans gloriam gratiam crucis It prefigured the glory and grace of the crosse 4. This further sheweth what wee are by nature and what by grace by these bitter waters the Lord would bring to light Amaritudinem quae in eorum cordibus latebat the bitternesse which lay hid in their hearts Calvin By nature therefore our waters that is our thoughts and all our actions are bitter but they are washed and purified by grace and faith in Christ. QUEST XLIII What law and ordinances the Lord here gave his people Vers. 25. THere he made them an ordinance and a Law 1. The Hebrewes thinke that this Law here given them was concerning the Sabbath which in the next Chapter is confirmed and established where they are forbidden to gather Manna upon the Sabbath But the law of the Sabbath was more ancient for immediately after the creation the Lord sanctified the seventh day of rest to bee perpetually observed and kept of his Church And it is not to be doubted of but that the Israelites kept the Sabbath in Egypt as may appeare by the institution of the Passeover wherein both in respect of the number of the seventh day prescribed to be an holy convocation and by the manner of keeping the same in resting from all servile worke Exod. 12.16 there seemeth to be relation to the rest of the Sabbath and seventh day which they were already acquainted with after the ensample whereof they should keepe the seventh day of unleavened bread 2. Lyranus thinketh that these were certaine ceremoniall Lawes as of the red cow prescribed afterward at large Num. 19. and other rites of legall purifyings as also some judicials But this is only his conjecture without any ground the first Law that was given the people after they came out of Egypt was the morall Law and before this it is evident that there were certaine ceremoniall rites and judiciall equities kept by the Fathers so that this was not the first time and place that they received such things 3. Simlerus is of opinion therefore that such ceremonies and rites as were preserved and continued by tradition from the Fathers were here by the authority of God confirmed that they should not take them as grounded upon custome only but warranted and commanded by God But it seemeth by the phrase He set them an ordinance that they received an ordinance not given them before and seeing that the Lord intended shortly within the space of little more than a moneth as may be gathered chap. 16.1 and chap. 19.1 to give them Lawes and ordinances in mount Sinai there appeared no such necessity to prevent that time and place 4. Pellican understandeth the Lawes and ceremonies which were given afterward in mount Sinai Eo loci sed non jam tunc About that place but not at that time But neither about that place were the Lawes given which were delivered in mount Sinai for betweene Marah and the desert of Sinai they had six stations or mansions as they are numbred Num. 33. from verse 9. to vers 16. And this Law here mentioned was given at this time while they stayed in Marah where they proved and tried their faith and obedience as the next words shew 5. Some thinke that the Lord here gave them Lawes Non scriptura sed ore ut justè viverent not in writing but by word of mouth that they should live uprightly Ferus And what Lawes they were is not here expressed Osiander But to what purpose should a Law be given not written that the people might alwayes have it in remembrance 6. Therefore what this Law and ordinance was is here in the next verse expressed where the Lord moveth the people to the obedience of his Lawes with promise to bee their protector in keeping them from the plagues and diseases of Egypt Iun. So that the Lord in this place dealeth two wayes with his people Postquam aqua penuria illos examinavit verbo etiam admonuit After he had tried and examined them with the want and penury of water hee doth also by his Word admonish them to be more obedient Calvin QUEST XLIV Why the Lord at this time gave his people a Law NOw why the Lord gave them this Law and ordinance in Marah the reasons may be these 1. Because the people a long time having beene in bondage were not used to the Lords yoke they might have said then with the Prophet Isai. 26.13 Other Lords beside thee have ruled us therefore Hoc populo longa servitute oppresso forte iâ— dissuetudinem venerant Because the people by their long servitude might perhaps have growne to a disuse the Lord giveth them a Law Simler 2. The Lord in thus doing Pactum cum patribus factum renovat Doth renne the covenant made with their Fathers Pellican Hee doth give them a Law to put them in mind of the ancient covenant made with their forefathers 3. The Lord taketh occasion by this present benefit in providing of them water in their distresse to take triall of their obedience Postquam aquae penuria examinavit populum After he had examined them with the penury of water Calvin Which might serve as a preparative to move them to obedience 4. Because they were a carnall and disobedient people they had need of a Law to bind them Carnales enim cancello legis indigent For carnall men had need to be held in by a Law Ferus As the Apostle saith The Law is not given to a righteous man but to the lawlesse and disobedient 1. Tim. 19. 5. The Lord here giveth them a Law to shew what was the end of their deliverance and redemption out of Egypt not to live as they list but to walke in obedience before God Populum docet ne ex servitute liberati ad carnis libidinem deflectat He teacheth the people lest they being delivered out of bondage should turne unto the lust of the flesh Pellican 6. And beside the Lord would by this meanes Paulatim populum jugo legis adsuefacere By little and little acquaint his people with the yoke of his Law which he was purposed to deliver more fully in mount Sinai Osiander So also Simler and Borrh. QUEST XLV Who is said here to tempt him ANd there he â—â—oved him 1. Some doe understand this of the people that they should tempt God and in that sense it is understood two wayes either that they tempted God after he had given them a Law which sheweth the
of his place which was done after Tostat. He therefore resolveth that Moses did write this propheticè by a propheticall instinct so also Iun. But this may be rather thought to be added by Ioshua or some other of the Prophets afterward as likewise the story of Moses death and buriall Deut. 34. which is not like to have beene penned by himselfe Piscator 2. Till they came to a land inhabited Augustine thus expoundeth Non quia continuò ut venerunt ad terram habitabilem c. Not because as soone as they came to a land inhabited they left eating of Manna Sed quia non ante But because not before But what land inhabited it was is expounded afterward namely the land of Canaan for though the Israelites possessed before the land of the Amorites on the other side of Jordan yet the Manna ceased not till they had passed over Jordan and were entred into the bounds and borders of Canaan which was the promised land that flowed with milke and hony Tostat. quast 15. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Of the excellencie and prâ—â—ogative of the Lords day Vers. 5. BVt the sixth day c. it shall be twice so much Origen upon this place well collecteth the prerogative and excellencie of the Lords day beyond the Sabbath of the Jewes proving that the Manna began first to fall upon that day his words are these Si sex diâ—bus continuis ut scriptura dicit collectum est à septima autem die quae est Sabbati cessatum est sine dubio initium ejus à die prima qua est dies Dominica fuit c. If the Manna were gathered six dayes together as the Scripture saith and it ceased upon the seventh which is the Sabbath without doubt it began on the first day which is the Lords day 2. Doct. That it is lawfull to lay up in store so it be done without distrust in Gods providence Vers. 19. LEt no man reserve thereof till the morning Though the Israelites were bound unto this precept because every day they received Manna from heaven and so the Compassions of God were renued every morning as the Prophet Ieremie saith Lament 3.23 yet this taketh not away all store and provision to be laid up aforehand for the sluggard is condemned for his sloth and carelesnesse and is sent by the Wise man to learne of the Ant which gathereth her meat in summer Prov. Our blessed Saviour also commanded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the remainder of the meat to be kept And the reason is not alike for then they received Manna every day and therefore needed not to lay up any thing in store But now the fruits of the earth are onely gathered in summer wherefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the letter of this precept is not to be urged but the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the sense and morall equitie bindeth us still that we take heed of an immoderate distrustfull care in making provision for the time to come but depend upon Gods fatherly providence Pelarg. 3. Doct. How Manna was a type and figure of Christ. Vers. 31. THey called the name of it Man c. The holy Apostle S. Paul maketh this Manna an evident type of Christ calling it their spirituall meat 1 Cor. 10.3 And in many things the type and figure agreeth unto the bodie and substance 1. In the causes of sending this Manna 2. In the conditionâ— and qualities thereof 3. In the manner of the gathering 4. In the use thereof Ferus First touching the causes 1. The Lord had compassion of his people when they were in want and almost famished in the wildernesse so Christ was given unto us that by faith in his bodie and bloud our hungrie soules should bee nourished Marbach 2. The Lord in sending Manna shewed his power his mercie goodnesse and love to his people and in nothing more appeareth the love of God to us than in sending his onely Sonne into the world to die for us 3. The Lord by sending Manna did prove whether his people would walke in his law or no vers 4. So the Lord maketh triall of the obedience of the world in receiving the law of his Sonne Christ that is the Gospell Ferus Secondly concerning the qualities and properties of Manna 1. It was but a small thing yet had great vertuâ—â— and Christ though in the low degree of a servant was of great power 2. The Manna was white and Christ was pure and unspotted 3. The Manna was ground in the mill or beaten in a morter and Christ was beaten and bruised for us Ferus 4. The Manna came from heaven so the Sonne of God descended and tooke upon him our flesh Simler 5. The Manna was sweet and pleasant as hony so is Christ unto the soule 6. The Manna fell with the dew so Christ brought with him abundance of spirit and grace 7. The Manna fell every day and Christ hath promised to be with his Church unto the end of the world 8. The Manna ceased as soone as they came into the land of Canaan and in the next world there shall be no use of the Word or Sacraments Ferus Thirdly in the gathering of Manna these conditions were observed 1. It was lawfull and free for all men and children male and female young and old master and servant to gather the Manna so there is neither bond nor free male nor female but all are one in Christ Gal. 3.28 Simler 2. They were commanded to gather every day and we must all our life long gather of the heavenly Manna 3. They were to goe out of their tents to gather it and wee must depart from our old conversation Ferus 4. They which gathered much had not the more nor they which gathered little the lesse so both those which are strong and they which are weake in faith are admitted to this Manna Marbach Fourthly for the use both good and bad did eat of the Manna so men of all sorts come unto the Word and Sacraments but not all to the same end for as the Manna putrified to those which kept it contrary to Moses commandement so the Word of God and the Sacraments are the savour of death unto death to those which unworthily receive them Ferus But it will here bee objected if this Manna were spirituall and heavenly food to the Israelites as S. Paul saith how is he reconciled with our Saviour Christ who saith Moses gave you not bread from heaven but my father giveth you true bread from heaven Ioh. 6.32 The answer here is ready that our Saviour speaketh according to their capacity and understanding with whom he there dealeth who had a carnall imagination of Manna and could see therein nothing but corporall food Simler 5. Places of Confutation 1. Conf. Against the carnall presence in the Eucharist Vers. 5. THe people shall goe out and gather Rupertus hath upon these words this glosse applying them to the Eucharist Si digne manducare
businesse fall into that very time when the people were preparing themselves to receive the law 2. Neither is it like that Iethro came immediately after the giving of the law for Moses stayed 40. dayes with God in the mount and then comming downe he judged the people for their Idolatrie which was no time to give entertainment to Iethro all the host being in heavinesse and after that Moses stayed 40. dayes more so that it was toward the end of the first yeare or the beginning of the second when Iethro came This is Tostatus second reason Contra. All this is easily granted and admitted that Iethro came not immediately after the law was given but this sheweth not that he came not before the giving of the law as is before declared 3. Againe seeing Iethro returned into his Countrie in the second yeare the second moneth when they were about to remove their campe from mount Sinai Numb 10.30 it is not like that hee would stay a whole yeare with Moses out of his owne Countrie Tostat. Contra. That storie concerning Hobabs departure who also is Iethro is transposed and that communication which Moses there hath with his father in law was had before that time which storie is here alleaged because it was there more fully to bee handled Iun. Seeing therefore that one of the stories must of necessitie be transposed and set out of his place it is for many reasons more agreeable to the order of the things which were done to referre that storie Numb 10. to this place than to joyne this unto that for immediately after that storie there inserted of Hobabs departure followeth in the next Chapter Num. 11 the constitution of the 70. Elders which was a divers ordinance from Iethros device of constituting Captaines over thousands hundreds and fiftie and like not to have followed immediately upon the other because Moses having made so many coadjutors so lately by the advice of his father in law which did helpe to beare the burden with him would not so soone have complained till he had had full triall and exâ—ience of that forme of government that he was not able to beare the people alone as he doth complaine Numb 11.14 4. Further it is objected that at Iethro his comming hee gave that advice for the appointing of under officers and Judges but this was done in the second yeare what time they were to remove from mount Sinai as Moses himselfe sheweth that it was about the same time when the Lord spake unto him to depart from Choreb Deut. 1.6 9. Tostat. Contra. Moses indeed saith I spake unto you the same time saying I am not able to beare you my selfe alone but these words The same time must not be restrained to the time of the Lords speaking unto them to remove from Choreb for how could that choice of officers be made in the instant of their removing but it must be understood generally of the time of their stay and abode by the mount Choreb Iun. 2. Wherefore the more probable opinion is that Iethro came unto Moses while they encamped about Choreb before they removed to the wildernesse of Sinai and there received the law in that order as it is here set downe by Moses 1. Because no anticipation of time or transposing of the storie is to be admitted in Scripture where no necessity of the sense enforceth it now here is no such necessity to urge us to thinke this storie to be set out of the place neither any inconvenience need to be feared in admitting the same to be done in this order as Moses hath penned it as is before shewed in the particular answer to the severall objections 2. The nearenesse of that place doth perswade as much that seeing Midian was not far off from Choreb where Moses had used to keepe his father in lawes sheepe it is like that Iethro invited by the nearenesse and opportunity of the place tooke this journey Lyranus And though Moses when he departed with his wife and children lodged by the way that might be because the children were young and tender and so he tooke easie journeyes or the day might bee farre spent when he tooke his leave of his father in law as when in the like case the Levite departed from his wives father Iud 19. 3. Neither is it like Moses with the host of Israel lying so neare unto Midian so long together well nie a yeare that Iethro would deferre so long to bring Moses wife and children unto him or that Mosâ—â— would all that while endure their absence from him Lyranus 4. The text sheweth that the report of those things which the Lord had done for Moses and Israel brought him thither it seemeth then that as soone as he had heard of the same of the late victory of the Amalekites Iethro dispatched presently to goe unto Moses Iosephus QUEST VIII Wherefore Iethro sent before to Moses Vers. 6. ANd he said to Moses 1. Iethro said thus by some messengers which he sent before to Moses which both shewes his humanity he would not presse upon Moses unawares though he were his father in law Simler And he did it Vt honestius reciperentur That they might be received in better manner for Moses honour Lyran. Tostat. It is like also that Iethro came with some troupe and company and therefore could have no safe passage or entrance without some safe conduct from Moses for the Israelites did stand upon their watch and guard because of their enemies which were round about them Simler It might be also that Iethro did this in humility not presuming to joyne himselfe to the people of God before he had made Moses acquainted Ferus QUEST IX Of the manner of Moses entertainment Vers. 7. ANd Moses went out to meet c. 1. Moses humility joyned with humanity appeareth in going forth to meet his father in law whom hee reverenceth as his elder and his father in law though in other respects Moses being the Ruler of such a great people and endued with such an excellent gift in the power of miracles were the more honourable person Tostat. 2. Then Moses sheweth his love in kissing him which was used then and is yet in some Countries as a signe and testimonie of love Marbach 3. Then his courtesie appeareth each in asking the other of their welfare and health Pelarg. 4. His beneficence and hospitality is declared in bringing him into his Tent. Pelarg. that they might better commune within of their affaires than abroad Lyran. This was Moses peculiar Tabernacle which he pitched without the host chap. 33.7 and whereupon the cloud used to rest before the great Tabernacle was set up Tostat. It was not that great Tabernacle where the Arke afterwards was put for it was not lawfull for any Gentile to enter therein Hugo de Sanct. Victor neither was yet that Tabernacle spoken of QUEST X. Why Moses declareth all these things unto Iethro Vers. 8. THen Moses told his father in law
specially attend the service of God so the people of Israel should all be as Priests in respect of other nations addicted to the worship of the true God Tostat. So that all other kingdomes were but profane in respect of them 3. Hereby also is signified their principality above other nations as Priests were reverenced and honoured of all and the speciall care which God had of them as they themselves had seene in Egypt how the Priests were reverenced of all and maintained out of the common Treasury Cajetan 4. The Chalde readeth yee shall be Kings and Priests that is they should under the regiment and kingdome of God be as Kings Quia nullum optabilius felicius regnum quam nos Deo subjicere Because there is no more happy kingdome than to subject our selves unto God Calv. for God was their King as the Lord saith to Samuel They have not cast thee off but cast me off that I should not reigne over them Cajet 5. They are also said to be a kingdome of Priests because Christ was to bee borne of that nation both King and Priest Ferus which his spirituall kingdome and priesthood by faith is communicated to his members whom he hath made Kings in subduing sinne and Satan and Priests in offering spirituall sacrifices unto God as S. Peter expoundeth and applieth this place 1. Pet. 2. Cajetan Lippoman 6. Oleaster bringeth foure interpretations of these words 1. That they should be a kingdome governed by Priests for the Lord was angry that the people had cast off the government of Samuel But it was never the Lords meaning that Levi should have the civill government of his people though some of Levi were extraordinarily raised up as Moses Samuel to judge his people because the scepter was promised to Iudah Gen. 49.10 2. The word cohanim may be translated Princes as well as Priests and then the meaning is they should all bee as Princes that is subject to none but unto God But it is not like that two words of like signification should be put together as Kingdome and Princes therefore the other sense of Priests is here more fit 3. They should be a kingdome of Priests that is all of them addicted and devoted to the service of God as if they were all Priests 4. Or they should be an holy people in respect of other nations and in comparison of them as Priests These two last senses are most fit and agreeable to the rest before alleaged QUEST X. By what reasons the Lord perswadeth the people and why Vers. 8. ANd the people answered 1. Thus by these perswasions before propounded the Lord thought good to winne the obedience and hearts of the people for seeing the Lord was to impose upon them a law lex est quoddam onus and the law is a certaine burthen for where a law is set the will of man is limited which man naturally desireth to be left free and therefore it was requisite that the people should be thus prepared to obedience Tostat. quaest 2. 2. The Lord perswadeth them partly with the commemoration of benefits past their deliverance out of Egypt and their protection in the wildernesse which is set forth by an elegant similitude taken from the Eagle which supporteth her young ones with her wings partly with the promise of future blessings that they should be a peculiar people to himselfe Simler 3. Then whereas men naturally partim fastu altitudine turgent partim securitate torpent partly doe swell with pride and haughtinesse partly grow slothfull by security Calvin These perswasions as soveraigne medicines doe meet with both these inconveniences the remembrance of Gods benefits doth serve to abate their pride that they should not ascribe their deliverance to themselves the promise of further blessings would provoke them not to bee idle 4. If the remembrance of these temporall benefits was so effectuall toward them how much more ought wee to remember Quod nos abundantiore gratia liberatos à peccatis nostris portavit Deus homo factus c. That God made man hath deliverd us by more abundant grace from our sinnes and carried us unto mount Sion to the celestiall Ierusalem c. Rupertus QUEST XI Whether the people unfainedly here promise obedience Vers. 8. ALl that the Lord hath commanded will wee doe 1. It seemeth that at this present the people had a good desire and full intent to keepe all the commandements of God for otherwise the Lord would not have commended them thus saying Deut. 5.28 I have heard the voice of the words of this people which they have spoken unto thee they have well said all that they have spoken O that there were such an heart in them to feare me and keepe my commandements alway The Lord would not both for the present have approved their saying and wished a continuance of their disposition if it had not proceeded from a good affection Tostat. quaest 3. Nec eos quicquam simulasse credibile est It is not credible or like that they dissembled at this time Calvin 2. But although this their readinesse to obey were not without the motion of the spirit of God in plaerisque tamen temporariam fuisse promptitudinem c. yet that it was but a temporary promptitude a willingnesse for a time in the most of them their doings which followed declare Simler So their first fault here committed is their frailty and inconstancy Propensus est populus sed fragilis inconstans The people seeme to bee ready yet fraile and inconstant Pellican Caro solet multa promittere nihil praestarâ— The flesh useth to promise much and performe nothing Ferus So that herein appeareth their temerity and rashnesse that promise great things as Peter did Sic facâ—unt qui propriâ—s confidunt viribus As all they doe which trust in their owne strength Lippoman 3. And seeing the people doe of themselves vow obedience to the law they afterward are most justly punished for the transgression of the law quasi vâ—ti rei as breakers of their vow and promise made unto God Gloss. ordinar QUEST XII How the Lord is said to come in the thicke cloud when and in what thicke cloud it was Vers. 9. LOe I come unto thee in a thicke cloud 1. Before the Lord came and appeared in the cloud but not to this end to speake to Moses in the hearing of the people and to give them a law for before the people had promised their obedience the Lord would thrust upon them a law against their willes Tostat. 2. Some thinke that presently the Lord came to Moses in a thicke cloud Intelligendâ—â— absque omni haesitatione est It must be understood without any deferring Cajetan But the cloud came not presently for the Lord thus spake to Moses upon the first or second day the cloud came not before the third day vers 16. Tostat. And when the cloud appeared the Lord talked with Moses out of the cloud but that
day c. 1. The opinion of some of the Rabbines is that this was not the 3. day of the moneth but the 6. day and the third from that time when the Lord thus spake to Moses for they say that upon the first day of the moneth Moses went up to God and received that message to bee delivered to the people and came downe the same day and stayed the next and reported not the answer of the people untill the 3. day R. Salom. Lyran. Cajetanus is of the same opinion that the first day of the moneth was but the 45. day after their departure out of Egypt and that the Lord upon the 48. day bid the people to bee ready against the third day after Contra. But this is not like for this would have shewed great negligence in Moses if he should have stayed so long before hee delivered the peoples minde to the Lord seeing mount Sinai was so neere unto the host 2. Some thinke that it was the third of the moneth and that it hath relation to the first day mentioned vers 1. Tostat. quaest 10. Gloss. ordin Ferus But this cannot stand neither for both Ferus and Gloss. interlin doe make the first day of the moneth but the 47. day then the third day wherein the law was given was but the 49. day but the day wherein the law was given is held of all to bee the Pentecost the 50. day Some to take away this doubt would borrow 17. dayes of the first moneth and 30. of the next and 3. of the third and so the publishing of the law shall fall out upon the 50. day So Augustine Gloss. ordin But there remained only 16. dayes of the first moneth to be counted the Passeover being kept upon the 14. day at even therefore they cannot make their reckoning of 17. dayes remaining in that moneth and to account 31. dayes unto the next moneth as some doe it was against the custome of the Hebrewes 3. Therefore it must thus be that on the first day of the moneth when the host was come into the wildernesse oâ— Sinai Moses went up to the Lord and came downe with the message to the people and then the next day went up with the peoples answer unto God for it is not like that all the host came thither and Moses went up and came downe and propounded the Lords words to the Elders and they to the people and received their answer and returned the same all upon one day And Cajetanes conceit herein is not to be refused that because the Lord saith To day and to morrow sanctifie them Insinuatur quod haec dicta fuerint manâ— It is insinuated that this was said in the morning This then was spoken upon the second day in the morning and the third day from thence was the law given which was not the third but the fourth day of the moneth Iun. Simler Rupertus also agreeth that the first day of the third moneth was the 47. day after the Passeover and that the fourth day after which was the 50. day Moses received the tables of the law but herein he differeth that the thicke cloud with the thunder and the lightning were seene and heard the day before which was the 49. But it is evident by the text that upon the third day was the voice of the Lord heard talking with Moses vers 19. QUEST XVII Whether the 15. day of the moneth were one of the fifty which went before the giving of the Law BUt here ariseth another doubt whether in the computation of these 50. dayes after the Passeover the next day after they had eaten the paschall lambe be included in that number or that there were fifty dayes beside 1. Some doe hold that the 15. day being the morrow after the Pasch must bee excluded because afterward in the law of the Pentecost they began the account of seven weekes upon the 16. day the morrow after the Sabbath or first solemne day of the Passeover as is further to be seene Lev. 23.11 and then after seven weekes complete the which make 49. dayes the next day which was the 50. was the day of Pentecost Cajetan But it is not necessary that this first 50. day should be accounted after that rule excluding the morrow after the Passeover as it may appeare partly by the text When yee bee come into the land which I shall give you vers 10. that law is made to bee kept after they were come to Canaan and the reason of this alteration was because they were to begin the account of the seven weekes from that day wherein they first put the sickle into the corne whereof they should bring a sheafe to shake before the Lord Deut. 16.9 which could not be done upon the first day of unleavened bread it being a solemne day and of the nature of a Sabbath wherein they were to doe no servile worke Levit. 23.7 Rupertus here agreeth that the Pentecost was not yeerely kept the just fiftith day after the Passeover as the law was given the fiftith day after the Passeover But herein he is deceived that upon what day soever the Passeover fell in the weeke they did expect the morrow after the next Sabbath when they were to bring in their sheafe and then beginne to count their seven weekes for herein is his errour he taketh the Sabbath there spoken of Levit. 23.10 for the seventh day of rest where it is understood to be the first day of unleavened bread which was a solemne day of rest as the Sabbath was Iun. Borrh. And by the way Rupertus in the same place slippeth in another point Prima dies azymorum Iudaeis in quintam feriam illo anno evenit The first day of unleavened happened to the Iewes that yeere upon the fifth day of the weeke For true it is that our blessed Saviour did eat the Passeover according to the law upon the 14. day which was as our Thursday at even but the Jewes following a tradition of their owne to avoid the concurrence of two Sabbath dayes did put off the eating of the Passeover untill the 15. day of the moneth at even which was the sixth day of the weeke because the next day was the Sabbath for if they had eat the Passeover when Christ did eat it with his Disciples then the next day should have beene kept holy neither were they to doe any worke therein but upon that day they put Christ to death which could not be done without more than servile labour in carrying the crosse and nailing Christ unto it and such like beside the text saith they would not put Christ to death upon the feast day lest there should bee some tumult among the people Mark 14.2 But this point is elsewhere handled more at large whither I referre the Reader 2. Some againe as Cajetane before excludeth the 15. day of the moneth out of the number of the 50. dayes so they include and take in both
have done it and not the Angels as it is said God prepared a worme to smite Ionas gourd Ion. 4.7 Therefore this observation also of Tostatus is untrue 4. But this evasion he hath that if the name of God be used and not of the Angels in such small and particular workes it is for the confirming of those that be weake but they which are weake because they cannot ascend at the first or comprehend the majesty and omnipotency of God had so much the more need by the secondary ministration of Angels to bee brought unto that high and deepe apprehension of God And indeed the ministry of Angels serveth especially for the comfort and supporting of the weake whose faith not serving them immediatly to depend upon God are the more easily brought to have confidence in him by the subordinate deputation and ministry of Angels So when Daniel was in great distresse and perplexity in the lions denne God sent his Angell to stop the mouth of the lions and to comfort Daniel Dan. 6.22 So when Ioseph was doubtfull what to doe concerning Mary an Angell of the Lord appeared unto him in a dreame to confirme him saying Feare not to take Mary for thy wife Matth. 1.20 5. That instance of Iakobs vision of the ladder directly proveth that it was God that appeared unto Iakob and not an Angell 1. Because it is said that Iehovah stood upon it and said by which name of Iehovah no Angell is called in Scripture 2. He that speaketh to Iakob nameth himselfe the Lord God of Abraham 3. He that speaketh is but one but the Angels which ascended and descended were many 4. He saith The land whereon thou sleepest will I give thee and thy seede but the earth is only the Lords 5. Iakob himselfe saith that Iehovah was in that place Gen. 28.16 6. 1. The people were but yet weake while they were in the wildernesse yet then and there that great worke of leading and keeping the people and bringing them to the land of Promise is ascribed to an Angell which was none other but Christ the Angell of Gods presence Exod. 23.20 2. Yea wee shall finde that mention is made oftner in the stories of the Patriarkes and first Fathers of Israel as in the bookes of Genesis and Exodus when they were yet as it were in their infancy of the apparition and ministry of Angels then afterward for it was fit that they should be confirmed by such visible and sensible meanes therefore this reason here alleaged by Tostatus holdeth not 3. And in that place whereof instance is given by Angel is understood some Prophet and man of God not any of the celestiall spirits because the place is named from whence he came from Gilgal and hee is said to ascend or goe up but Angels descend from heaven and it is not unusuall in Scripture to call Prophets the Lords Angels as Hagg. 1.13 and Apocal. 2. and 3. chapter thorowout QUEST XXI Whether it were Iehovah the Lord Christ or an Angell that came downe upon mount Sinai 7. BUt that it was Iehovah himselfe the Lord Christ that appeared in mount Sinai and talked with Moses and gave them the law it is thus proved 1. Because he is called Iehovah which name is never in Scripture given unto Angels 2. Hee saith vers 5. Though all the earth bee mine but the earth is the Lords Psal. 24. not the Angels 3. The Lord here maketh a covenant with his people vers 5. But God himselfe not the Angels make a covenant with men to bee his people And so the Lord saith hee was an husband unto them Iere. 31.32 but Christ and not the Angels is the husband of the Church behold the Church is not the spouse of the Angels but Christs 4. He which writ the Law in tables of stone was the same that gave the Law to Moses but those tables were written by the finger of God Exod. 3â— 18 the same finger that writeth in the fleshy tables of mens hearts Ierem. 31.33 2. Cor. 3.2 5. S. Paul saith it was ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediatour Gal. 3.14 The Angels attended as ministers and as the Lords instruments were used in those thunders and lightnings But the Lord himselfe the Mediatour both of the old and new Testament was there present as the Author of the Law as Moses saith The Lord came from Sinai c. he came with ten thousand of Saints and at his right hand a fiery Law for them Deut. 33.2 6. He that wrought those wonders in Egypt and carried the people as upon Eagles wings was the same that delivered the Law vers 4. But Iehovah himselfe did the first for many of the wonders in Egypt could not be done by any but the Lord as in converting and changing of one substance into another as of a rod into a Serpent of water into bloud of the dust into lice And so much Tostatus himselfe confesseth Fiâ—â—ant talia portenta quae nullus poterat facere nisi Deus Such wondrous things were done which none could doe but God So it was Iehovah himselfe that did leade the people thorow the red Sea and destroyed the Egyptians as chap. 14.24 Iehovah looked unto the hoast of the Egyptians out of the fiery and cloudy piller who is before called the Angell of God vers 19. which was the Lord Christ called the Angell of the covenant Malach. 3.1 So chap. 15.14 Iehovah brought the waters of the Sea upon them And further that Iehovah himselfe conducted the Israelites is evident Exod. 33.15 My presence shall go with thee And yet the Lord saith Exod. 23.20 Behold I send an Angell before thee to keepe thee in the way but what Angell this was is expressed afterward my name is in him This great Angell of the covenant in whom was Gods name and his presence who else could it be but the Lord Christ the Iehovah And that God himselfe appeared unto the Patriarkes and Prophets and not the Angels onely it is evident Numb 12.8 where the Lord saith Vnto Moses I will speake mouth to mouth c. he shall see the similitude of the Lord and the Apostle witnesseth that he that is Moses endured at he which saw him which is in visible Heb. 11.27 Not that Moses did see the very glory and substance of God who is invisible and whom never man saw nor can see 1. Tim. 6.12 but he saw only his backe parts Exod. 33.14 that is some part of his glory as the Lord thought good to reveale according as Moses was able to apprehend And that in this place it was Iehovah himselfe that came downe in Mount Sinai beside these reasons before alleaged it is the generall opinion of Divines both old and new Gregor Nyssen Praecepit Deus populo per Moseâ— ut tam corpore quam animo mundus fierit God commanded the people by Moses that they should be cleane both in body and soule Hierom. Accessuri ad audienda verba Dei
puritie of the bodie Indumentum enim animae corpus quodam modo est For the bodie is as it were a garment to the soule Raban Vestimenta lavare est opera mundare To wash the garments is to cleanse the works Vestimenta lavare est conscientiam vera fide imbuere to wash the garments is to endue the conscience with faith Lippom. By the washing of the garments is understood Cast it as mentis corporis The chastitie both of bodie and minde Gloss. interlin See more hereof before quest 15. 3. Some thinke that they washed their garments with that purifying water which was made of the ashes of the red Cow prescribed Numb 19. But that is not like for that water was to bee sprinkled against the Tabernacle which was not yet made and Eleazar was to take of the bloud of the Cow with his finger c. But neither Eleazar nor Aaron his father were yet consecrated to the Priesthood therefore they washed their garments with no other than common water at this time Tostat. quaest 9. in 19. cap. QUEST XXIX Why they are commanded not to come at their wives Vers. 15. ANd come not at your wives c. 1. The Latine tanslator readeth Come not neare your wives but your is not in the originall yet it well expresseth the sense for at no time was it lawfull to come neare unto other mens wives Lippom. Some thinke that hereby is meant that wee should not come neare Alicui carnali voluptati vel mundana Any carnall or worldly pleasure when we come neare unto God Gloss. interlin Indeed by this one particular inhibition of one carnall pleasure by the like analogie all other were forbidden but there is a literall inhibiting also of companie and societie with their wives 3. Some give this sense Conjux hîc sensuâ— intelligitur c. The wife is here understood to bee the sense which is joyned unto our nature c. Gregor Nyssen ex Lippom. And so we are bidden to lay aside all carnall sensualitie when we appeare before God But this is to goe from the letter of the text 4. Some make it onely a morall precept that men should abstaine even from lawfull things when they present themselves before God as the Apostle requireth the like of the married couple to abstaine for a time that they may give themselves to fasting prayer 1 Cor. 7. Hieron Rupert Galas but this being a legall injunction contained a further reason than is enforced now in respect of those times 5. So that beside the morall equitie even from lawfull pleasure which bindeth now also in the abstinence for a time from the marriage bed upon occasion of more fervent and extraordinary prayer Marbach there was then also a Legall kind of impuritie and pollution even in the lawfull use of marriage which came by the issue of seed Lavit 15.18 from which kind of Legall pollutions the people were to be sanctified and cleansed at this time Oleaster 6. But that saying of Lyranus is somewhat harsh Licet matrimonialis actus sit licitus tamen annexam habet quandam turpitudinem c. Though the act of the matrimonie be lawfull yet it hath annexed unto it a kind of filthinesse which is excused by the good things in marriage But the Apostle speaketh otherwise That marriage is honourable c. and the bed undefiled Hebr. 13.4 There is then in the undefiled marriage bed no filthinesse or uncleannesse But that other assertion of Lyranus is not much to be misliked Habet annexam depressionem mentis c. It hath also annexed a certaine depression and abasing of the minde because of the vehemencie of carnall delight And therefore they were commanded these three dayes to be sequestred from their wives that their minds might wholly be weaned from carnall delight and bee fixed upon God QUEST XXX Why Moses maketh such an ample and full declaration and description of the Lords glorious appearing in mount Sinai Vers. 16. ANd the third day c. there was thunder and lightnings c. 1. Moses in many words describeth the comming of the Lord and his appearing in mount Sinai Cupiebat enim virpius quam amplissimis posset verbis c. For this godly man desired in the best manner he could to set forth the magnificence of the comming of the Lord. Ferus Sometime Moses goeth up sometime he commeth downe sometime he goeth up alone and another time Aaron with him and all this he doth Vt pararet Domiâ—â— dignum acceptabilem populum c. To prepare a meete and acceptable people for the Lord Lippom. 2. Beside this large description also delivereth Moses from all suspition of deceit and counterfeiting as though he had fained as other lawgivers among the Heathen that he had conference with God for first this preparation of the people against the third day then the talking of the Lord with Moses in the hearing of all the people which were divers hundred thousands doth shew the truth of this narration Lippom. And these prodigious and extraordinarie signes raised upon the suddaine to cleare Moses In serenâ— die subitò mons tenebris circumdatus c. On a suddaine in a cleare morning the hill was beset round with darknesse and fire burst forth of the middest thereof Gregor Nyssen As it is observed in the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrha by the rising of the Sun and shining upon the earth when Lot entred into Zoar Genes 19.23 that it was a goodly Sun-shine morning when it rained fire and brimstone upon those Cities QUEST XXXI Why it pleased the Lord in this terrible and fearefull manner to appeare with thunder and lightning Vers. 16. THere was thunder and lightning c. 1. Foure signes the Lord sheweth of his comming two were heard the thunder and the sound of the trumpet and two were seene the lightning and the thicke or darke cloud and these appeared in the top of the hill not all over for if the cloud had covered all the hill the people could not have discerned the smoake which was round about upon the hill Cajetan 2. It pleased God in this terrible manner to shew himselfe at the giving of the law for these reasons 1. Because the rude world doth onely esteeme of those things which are done with great shew and magnificence the Lord would in this glorious manner appeare Vt disceret populus cum magni â—stimare That the people should learne highly to esteeme of God 2. Commovit omnia elementa c. He moved all the elements that they might know that he had power over all 3. That the ignorant people might know a difference betweene the true God and the false gods whom the Heathen and especially the Egyptians worshipped that they could doe no such things 4. Vt populo carnali timorem incuteret c. To strike feare and terror into the carnall people that they which would not be wonne by love should be constrained with feare 5.
Vt ostenderet se vendicem legis c. To shew himselfe a Iudge and revenger of those which transgressed his law and in what fearefull manner he would come to judgement to take account of men how they had kept his law Ferus 3. Chrysostome toucheth another reason Negligens erat humanum genus signe oportet igitur ut corrigeretur istis redderetur attentum Mankind was negligent and slothfull and therefore it was meete that they should bee roused up by this meanes and made attentive 4. Another reason why the Lord did thinke good thus to shew himselfe in smoake and fire was this Quia talis apparitio in nube igne non habet figuram Because such an apparition in fire and a cloud hath no representation that by this meanes the people should have no occasion to commit idolatrie Lyran. As the Lord himselfe saith Take heed to your selves for yee saw no image in the day that the Lord spake unto you in Horeb Deut. 4.15 Tostat. quaest 11. 5. The morall application is this The Lord appeared partly in the brightnesse of fire partly in the darknesse of a cloud Quia humiles per claritatem sua ostensionis illuminat Because he doth illuminate the humble by the brightnesse of his appearing Et superbos per caliginem erroris obscurat And he obscureth the proud by the darknesse of error Gloss. interlin Some further make this mysticall application by the thunder and lightning we may understand God the Father by the cloud the Sonne who assumed our humane nature which shadowed the glorie of his Deitie by the sound of the trumpet the holy Ghost which worketh in the hearts of faithfull people by the trumpet of the Gospell Simler QUEST XXXII Whether this thunder and lightning were naturall THere was thunder and lightning 1. These signes were not naturally caused in respect both of the time and place for now it was about the middest of Summer in the beginning of June the third moneth after the spring when such meteors use not to be ingendred and for the place it was in an hot region in Arabia where the extreme heate doth drie up such exhalations whereof thunder and lightning doe consist And beside the naturall place of these meteors is above in the middle region of the aire where the aire is very cold and so the beating of the aire by an antiperistasis a concurrence and resistance of contrary qualities procureth such thunder-claps and flashings but these signes were shewed below upon the top of the hill in the lower region of the aire Tostat. 2. Neither yet doe I thinke with Tostatus that it was neither verus ignis nor vera fulgura true fire or true lightning but that they so seemed to be because then saith he the fire and lightning would have burned and consumed those that came neere it But this is no good reason for it was no hard matter for the Creator to abate the ordinarie force of these elements as the fire consumed not the bush Exod. 3. neither yet had it any power upon the three children that were put into the fierie fornace Dan. 3. Therefore it was more than an imaginary fire or in shew onely Nihil simplex natura per duplicitatem facit The single and simple truth doth nothing doubly Lyran 3. Wherefore I rather preferre the resolution of Thomas that this was Ignis corporalis ideo palpabilis sensibilis c. A corporall fire palpable and sensible It was a true fire yet not naturall neither yet without naturall meanes altogether but the same supernaturally caused for here was a thicke and darke cloud such as the thunder and lightning useth to breake out of but it was extraordinarily raised out of time and place by the power of God QUEST XXXIII Why the Lord appeared in a thicke and darke cloud Vers. 16. ANd a thicke cloud upon the mount c. 1. This appearing of a thicke and darke cloud was convenient for those times Congruit nubes in fanctionem legalem quae tenebrarum est non lucis The cloud is agreeable to the function of the law which is of darknesse rather than light Borrh. For all things were folded up in the law in shadowes as in a cloud but the revelation of the true light came by Jesus Christ. 2. This also sheweth the infirmitie and weaknesse of man who cannot see the brightnesse of Gods glorie who dwelleth in light that none can attaine unto 1 Tim. 6. but wee see it as thorow a cloud as here the Lord appeareth in fire yet in the middest of smoake and shining thorow a thicke cloud Simler To this purpose also Lyranus saith that therefore God appeared in a darke cloud Quia tales apparitiones fiunt communiter secundum eorum dispositiones quibus fiunt Because such apparitions commonly are made according to their disposition to whom they are shewed Now we have here but a darke and obscure knowledge of divine things and as the eye of the Owle is to the Sunne light so is the minde and understanding of man in respect of divine things Sic Lyran. 3. Unto this assertion of Lyranus two exceptions are taken one by Paulus Burgens the other by Tostatus but both of them without any good ground First Burgensis thus objecteth that Lyranus in this note maketh no difference betweene the knowledge of Moses and of the rest of the people whereas he appeared unto Moses onely in a cloud Numb 12.5 but unto the people in a thicke cloud because Moses clariorem habuit de divinis notitiam quà m populus had a clearer knowledge of divine things than the people Burgens addit 3. Contra. 1. Howsoever the Lord appeared at other times to Moses it is no◠here the question Now the Lord appeared alike to all as well to Moses as to the rest of the people in a thicke and darke cloud which sheweth that although there is difference of gifts and illumination among men yet being compared to God there is no difference Moses himselfe here quaked and trembled as the Apostle observeth Heb. 12 21. as the rest of the people did 2. And that other place is not fitly alleaged for the Lord came downe in the piller of the cloud at that time and spake not onely to Moses but to Aaron and Miriam also 4. Tostatus taketh exception because Lyranus doth not distinguish betweene the apparitions of the old and new Testament whereas the apparitions in the old were obscure Apparitiones antem factae in novo sunt clariores But the aparitions made in the new are more cleare As the holy Ghost came downe upon the Apostles not in fire with the darknesse of a cloud but in bright fire like unto cloven tongues Tostat. quaest 11. Contra. This is true which is here alleaged that the apparitions of the new Testament are clearer and more full of light than the visions of the old neither is it denied by Lyranus yet it followeth not but
that in resâ—ect of the knowledge which we shall have in the life to come we see now but darkly and as in a cloud And to this purpose he alleageth that saying of the Apostle Now we see thorow a glasse darkly but then shall we see face to face now I know in part but then shall I know even as I am knowne 1 Cor. 13.12 Lyranus annotation therefore being so evidently grounded upon the Apostles direct words they had small reason thus to carpe at him QUEST XXXIV Of the blowing of the trumpet at the giving of the law what it signifieth ANd the sound of the trumpet exceeding loud 1. There was not there any such materiall trumpet as the Jewes imagine that it was an horne made of the Rammes hornes which was sacrificed in stead of Izbak Lyran. But such a sound was made by the ministry of Angels as if it had beene the blowing of a trumpet Tostat. for as S. Stephen sheweth they received the law by ordinance of Angels Act. 7.53 The Angels attended upon the Lord as Ministers when the law was given Simler 2. This sounding of the trumpet was a signe of the presence of God tanquam imperatore praesente as if a great Emperour were comming before whom they use to blow trumpets Chrysost. 3. Sonitus â—â—ba significat gravitatem praeceptorum c. The sound of the trumpet betokened the heavinesse of the commandements quibus indicebatur bellum homini contra seipsum by the which warre is proclaimed to man against himselfe Thomas 4. As the sounding of this trumpet made a terrible and fearefull noise Sic lex tumultum excitat in conscientia peccatorum So the law raiseth a tumult in the conscience of sinners Lippoman Tales terrores in conscientia peccatoris lex Dei operatur Such terrors the law of God stirreth in the conscience of the sinner Osiand 5. Hereby also was prefigured the office of the Levites that sounded afterward with silver trumpets which also was a figure of the silver sound which the living trumpets of the Prophets and Apostles should give in gathering together the faithfull by the preaching of the Gospell as Isaias was bidden to lift up his voyce like a trumpet Isai. 58.1 Simler Herein also is set forth the forme of Christs comming to judgement when the trump shall blow and summon all both the living and dead to give account how they have kept this law which was first given with the sound of a trumpet of the blowing of this last dolefull and dreadfull trumpet speaketh the Apostle 1 Cor. 15.52 1 Thess. 4.16 6. Oleaster thinketh that the sounding of this trumpet was a signe of the departing of the Lord from the mount and of the libertie of the people to come up but it shewed the contrary that God was then come downe upon the mount and therefore Moses bringeth the people out of their tents to meet God in the next verse Hereof see more before quest 26. QUEST XXXV Of the different manner of the delivering the law and the Gospell Vers. 16. ANd all the people that was in the campe was afraid 1. By this terrible apparition which wrought in the people such terror and feare the nature of the law is expressed which as it was delivered with feare and trembling so it worketh terror in the conscience for divine apparitions are made agreeable to the thing for the which they are shewed so the Angels appeared to Abraham in humane shape because they came to tell Abraham that he should have a sonne When the Israelites were in the fierie fornace of affliction in Egypt the Lord appeared in a flame of fire in a bush When Ioshua was to warre against the Cananites an Angell appeared with a naked sword so because a law here is given which should reveale sinne and the wrath of God against the transgressors thereof it is delivered with feare and terror Ferus 2. Herein then appeareth a manifest difference betweene the Law and the Gospell 1. In the Law-giver then the Lord appeared in fire and smoake and terrible manner but Christ came lowly and meeke to preach the Gospell 2. In the place the Law was delivered in Sinai a place of servitude the Gospel began to be preached in Jerusalem which was a figure of the new Jerusalem which is above which is free Galath 4.26 3. In the Law it selfe which is a killing letter threatning curses and damnation to all the disobedient but spirit and life is given by the faith of the Gospell of Christ. 4. In the people which received it they were then rude and ignorant as children under tutors and governours they could not see the brightnesse of Moses face but under a vaile we now under the Gospell are as the heire which is come to age and now the vaile is removed and we see the glory of the Lord with open face Simler 5. Augustine therefore well saith Brevis differentia legis Evangelii timor amor There is a short difference of the Law and Gospell feare and love for Christ did teach the Gospell in great tranquillitie Incepit sedens dulciter tradere documenta legis novae He began being set to deliver sweetly the precepts of the new law Tostat. saying Blessed are the poore in spirit c. blessed are the meeke Ita lex vetus data est cum terroribus So the old law was given with terrors Lyranus 6. Yet we are not so to conceive as though the Gospell were altogether void of feare or the Law of comfort Hic timor Evangelio quoque fuit communis This feare was also common to the Gospell as the Apostle sheweth Whose voyce then shooke the earth and now hath declared saying Yet once more will I shake not the earth onely but also heaven Heb. 12.26 Calvin And againe If the word spoken by Angels was stedfast and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompence of reward how shall we escape if we neglect so great salvation Heb. 2.2 Neither was the law altogether void of comfort for in that the people are not fraied away by these fearefull signes but are brought by Moses to meet the Lord it sheweth Foedus Dei tam amabile fuisse quam metuendum That the covenant of God was as amiable as it was terrible and fearefull Calvin But here is the difference The law of it selfe and properly wrought feare and terror and the Gospell peace but accidentally also there was comfort in the law as it was a School-master to bring us to Christ and terror in the Gospell to them which contemned and refused it 7. Some thinke that in this generall and great feare of the whole campe yet that Moses feared not and was therein a type and figure of such as are perfect Pellican But the Apostle sheweth the contrary that even Moses also trembled and quaked Heb. 12.21 But yet Moses was not afraid as the people were Timuit Moses sed non timore servili ut populus c. Moses feared but
and not to the law onely Quis dubitat per Angelos ministratam fuisse omnem veteris Testamenti dispensationem Who doubteth but that all the dispensation of the old Testament was ministred by the Angels Marlorat in 3. Galath v. 19. and Iunius in his Parallels upon that place Act. 7.53 saith to this effect that the Angels were ministri postea sermonis ad populum non authores legis that the Angels were ministers of the word afterward to the people but not authors of the law But this place being compared with Act. 7.53 and Galath 3.19 where it is said that the law was ordained by Angels it will draw also the word here said to be spoken by the Angels to be understood of the law 5. Iunius hath another exposition that the law was ordained inter Angelos among the Angels Annot Galath 3.19 and in his Parallels he saith the law was exhibited onely by Christ inter ordines Angelorum among the orders of the Angels but the phrase it selfe spoken by the Angels giveth more to be understood than among the Angels 6. Wherefore I preferre Chrysostoms exposition upon that place Galath 3.19 Sentit ipsos Angelos subministrasse ferenda legi He meaneth that the Angels did minister at the giving of the Law It is one thing for the Angels as Gods deputies to deliver the Law another as ministers and instruments As sometime the Prince may send Commissioners to execute his Edicts who doe supplie his person and authoritie sometime he being present in Majestie may by the mouth of another proclaime his Edict So at other times the Angels did speake in the name and person of God as the Angell did call to Abraham Genes 22. sometime they did attend as ministring spirits upon the Majestie of God as his Criers and Proclaimers So the law was delivered in mount Sinai by the authoritie of God himselfe appearing in Majestie who endited and framed the law but it might be proclaimed by the Angels concurring by their ministrie in the framing of that audible voyce and sound which was heard QUEST XXXVIII Why Moses is commanded to charge the people againe Vers. 21. GOe downe charge the people 1. Though this charge was given before yet the Lord commandeth it to be done againe Imminente jam hora ad majorem certitudinem The very houre being now instant for more certaintie Lyran. For they would the rather take heed Cum recentius in Dei prasentia mandarentur Being charged afresh and in the presence of God Tostat. 2. Another reason of renuing this charge was the stubborne nature of the people who had need often to be admonished and although Moses thought it not needfull againe to charge them as it appeareth by his answer and in a manner refusall vers 23. yet the Lord Sciebat sibi cum prafractis esse negotium Knew that he had to deale with such as were stubborne Calvin 3. And further though they had beene straitly charged before not to exceed their prefixed limits and bounds yet they would have adventured Ipso absente mora tamdiu curiâ—sâ— appetitu victi In Moses absence partly not enduring longer delay partly of a curious desire to have gone beyond their marks Galas 4. As also the charge is iterated in respect of the speciall interdict of the Priests who might have presumed being not before specially and in particular named the charge being given to the people in generall Simler QUEST XXXIX What Priests are here understood Vers. 21. ANd let the Priests also 1. Because the order of Priests was not yet instituted some thinke that is spoken by anticipation and prevention that afterward when the Priests should be ordained and consecrated they should be sanctified when they came into the presence of God Ex Lyran. But it seemeth by the sending downe of Moses that this charge was presently to be given by Moses and by the other to be executed And further it is said Let the Priests which come to the Lord be sanctified The Lord then speaketh of those Priests which already had accesse unto God not of those which should be assigned afterward Tostat. 2. Some thinke that by this word cohanim which signifieth as well Princes as Priests are understood the Tribunes Officers and Judges of the people which were before appointed by the counsell and advice of Iethro Lippom. Genevens But their office was to judge the people and heare their controversies the office of those Priests was to have accesse unto the presence of God in offering of sacrifices 3. Some thinke that the Priests were consecrated now but that it is set downe afterward Oleaster But this were without any necessitie to disturbe and transpose the order of the storie 4. Therefore their opinion is most probable who thinke that these Priests were the first borne to whom the prerogative of the Priesthood belonged till it was by Gods appointment setled in the Tribe of Levi But neither all the first borne in Israel that were consectated unto God were Priests as Iun. Borrh. For it is not probable in so great a multitude Singulis domibus proprios fuisse Sacerdotes That every house had his peculiar and proper Priest Calvin Neither were they onely Primogeniti Principum duodecim tribuum c. The first borne of the Princes of the twelve Tribes which offered sacrifice chap. 24.5 As R. Salomon Lyran. For so small a number of Priests sufficed not for the whole multitude They were then as well Filii primogeniti aliorum magnorum virorum The first borne sonnes of other great men which were the Princes of the families as the first borne of the Princes of the Tribes Tostat. quaest 12. 5. And by drawing neere unto God is not here meant that speciall kind of accesse to enquire of God which Moses did onely then and the high Priest afterward by his Vrim and Thummim but the comming unto God to minister as the Chalde interpreteth Tostat. Lippom. QUEST XL. Why Moses replieth as unwilling to goe downe Vers. 23. ANd Moses said unto the Lord. 1. Some thinke that Moses thus replied Quod non videbatur necessarium ut ista contestatio fierat As though it seemed not necessarie that this contestation should be made Tostat. But it is not to be thought that Moses would so contradict the Lord having beene of late in so great feare that the Lord spake unto him to comfort him 2. Some say that Moses thus spake not as though he tooke this charge to be superfluous but to shew his faithfulnesse that he had carefully before intimated to the people the will and pleasure of God therein Simler But the Lord was not ignorant what Moses had done that he needed to make repetition of his service 3. Some thinke that Moses Andiendo populo mandatum refricat That Moses thus answereth that hee might in hearing of the people rubbe their memorie lest they might forget any thing of the charge Pellican But Moses was not yet gone downe to the people and
the law of Christ but that much was permitted and tolerated unto the Jewes onely for the hardnesse of their heart as our blessed Saviour sheweth Matth. 19. 2. Some doe urge the lawes of men and the greater punishments which have beene laid upon women for adulterie rather than upon men and that therefore the sinne of the woman should bee the greater But this sheweth not the greatnesse of the sinne before God but the greater inconvenience that is brought upon the civill and politike state which the lawes of men seeke chiefly to preserve by the adulterie of the woman rather than of the man 3. Some thinke that it is a greater sinne in the man because of his authoritie quia vir caput mulieris because the man is head of the woman and the Apostle biddeth that women if they would learne any thing should aske their husbands at home 1 Cor. 14.35 Est ergo vir doctor mulieris The man then is the womans teacher then as the Priest sinneth more than a lay man because he is his teacher so the man doth more grievously offend than the woman Thomas in opuscul But this proveth not that the sinne of the man simply is greater than the sinne of the woman but in a certaine respect 4. Wherefore the best answer is that the sinne of adulterie in some respects is equall in both sexes and in some other greater both in the one and the other 1. In regard of the law of Matrimonie whereby they have given their faith each to the other the sinne seemeth to be equall for the man hath no more power over himselfe in this behalfe than the woman as S. Paul teacheth 1 Cor. 7.4 and therefore by Moses law as well the adulterer as the adulteresse was to be put to death 2. But in respect of the qualitie and condition of the person because the woman is the weaker vessell and the man is the head of the woman and of the more strength this sinne is greater in the man because hee therein give than evill example to the weaker partie and teacheth her an evill lesson Ecclesiasticus 9.1 3. But the inconveniences considered that follow hereupon as the ignominie and shame of houses the confusion of inheritances and the obtruding of false heires by the adulterie and false play of women their sinne is thought to exceâ—d Simler Which might be the reason also why among the Jewes the men were permitted to have divers wives but not the women to have divers husbands QUEST IX Whether adulterie be now necessarily to be punished by death SOmewhat here would bee inserted concerning the punishment of adulterie by the sentence of death wherein there are these three opinions 1. Some thinke that adulterie ought to be punished capitally according to the judiciall law of Moses and not otherwise Piscaetor giveth divers reasons hereof but two especially I will single out 1. Delicta temporibus naturam suam non mutant Sinnes doe not change their nature in time 2. Deus naturam suam non mutat Neither doth God change his nature so that he hateth sinne no lesse now than in times past neither will he have it lesse punished Praefat. in Exod. Contra. 1. The nature of sinne is the same though the punishment bee altered adulterie is as grievous before God now as it was under the law but the circumstances as of place and person so also of time may give occasion of aggravating or alleviating the punishment Hee that gathered sticks upon the Sabbath was stoned to death Numb 30. because it was necessarie that the law at the beginning being then newly given should bee established by severitie But yet our Saviour excuseth his Apostles for gathering and rubbing eares of corne upon the Sabbath Matth. 12. Saint Peter pronounced the sentence of death upon Aâ—amas and Sapphira for deteining part of that which they had given to the Church for the terror and example of others yet now such dissimulation is not held to be worthie of death 2. Neither is God changed by the changing or mitigating the rigour of the law but he removing the same applieth his law according to the different respect of 〈◊〉 and persons for as well hee might bee said to be changed in the changing of other 〈◊〉 as of the ceremoniall and judicials thereto annexed 4. If all judicials annexed to the Morall law are now to be necessarily retained then the violating of the rest of the Lords day as then of the Sabbath which was in that respect morall should be punished with death and blaspheming and prophaning of the name of God by swearing as Levit. 24.16 which would seeme to be too rigorous 5. And seeing the times of the Gospell are the times of mercie and those under the Law were the times of rigour and severitie to abate somewhat of the rigorous punishments of the Law not leaving sinne unpunished may seeme not unlawfull 2. Another opinion is that adulterie is not at all now to be punished by death for our Saviour would not condemne the woman taken in adulterie Ioh. 8. Contra. 1. Upon that example of Christ it cannot be gathered that it is unlawfull to censure adultery by death for it would follow as well that adultery is not to be punished at all because Christ inflicteth no punishment at all upon her onely this may be inferred that by Christs silence and forbearance it appeareth that the punishment of adultery by death is not necessary for if his will had beene that the rigour of that law should stand in force our Saviour needed not to have feared their trap lest they should have condemned him of rigour and severitie if he had judged her worthie of death and if he had repealed that law they would have accused him as contrarie to Moses 3. This then may bee collected by Christs silence and connivence that it is not necessarie that adulterie should alwayes and in all places be sentenced unto death but rather that it is left indifferent that neither those Churches are to be condemned of too great severitie which follow the president of Moses judicials herein nor yet they are to be accused of too much lenitie which judge adulterie otherwise than by death as they see it best to fit their estate so that the severitie of the punishment be answerable to the quality of the sinne By Moses law they which committed adulterie were to die the death that is if it were duplex adulterium that both the adulterer and adulteresse were married or if the woman were anothers wife Levit. 20.10 otherwise it was not death for a married man beside his wife to have a Concubine or to one wife to take another so shee were not anothers wife What will they thinke now of such single adulterie that would have it revenged by death they have no president in Moses law for the punishing of this kinde of adulterie by death then it is evident that all adulterie by the law of Moses was not adjudged to
may bee some blemish and imperfection in the manner seeing our best actions are stained as the Prophet saith All our righteousnesse is 〈◊〉 filthie clouts Isai. 64.4 3. If veniall sin be taken for a small offence wee denie not but that such blemishes are found in matrimoniall duties which are tolerated and covered in mariage according to that excellent saying of Augustine Libidinis voluptas non propter nuptias cadit in culpam sed propter nuptias accipit veniam The pleasure of lusts doth not take blame because of mariage but for mariage sake doth receive pardon Lib. 1. de concupis cap. 15. 4. But mortall or deadly sin in mariage there is none that is in his sense haynous and grievous for if his meaning be that the fleshly desire would extend it selfe to another that is coveteth strange flesh this is not incident unto any act of mariage but is a violating of mariage by adulterous and unchaste thoughts And if there could be any sâ—ch mortall and deadly sin in the duties of mariage what is become of that saying of the Apostle concerning the giving in mariage Hee sinneth not 1 Cor. 7.36 which also may bee understood of the duties of mariage Augustine hath this worthie saying Sicut bono uti malè malum est ita maleâ—ti bene bonum est benè utitur bono continentiam dedicans Deo bono utitur malè continentiam dedicons idolo malo utitur male concupiscentiam relaxans adulteriâ— bene utitur malo concupiscentiam restringâ—â—s connubio As it is evill to use a good thing evill so it is good to use an evill thing well as hee useth a good thing well that dedicateth his continencie unto God hee useth a good thing evill that dedicateth his continencie to an Idoll hee useth an evill thing evill that doth loose the reines of his concupiscence to adulterie he useth an evill thing evill who restraineth his concupiscence to matrimonie August cont Pelag. 1.19 If he doe an evill thing well that limiteth and keepeth his concupiscence within the bounds of mariage hee then cannot sinne mortally V. Confut. Against Tostatus that would not have simple fornication punished by humane lawes AGainst Tostatus here also worthily exception is taken who justifieth this defect and imperfection in humane lawes he meaneth such as are practised among the Romanists which doe not punish simple fornication these are his words Injustissima civilis lex esset qua â—eretrices tolleret That should be a most unjust Civill law which should take away strumpets and punish simple fornication c. Wee will see and examine his reasons 1. Civill lawes are only to restraine such sins whereby justice is violated and injurie done unto another but in fornication there is no act of injustice Non est ibi aliqua persona cui inferatur injuria There is no person there to whom any injurie can bee done Contra. There is a manifold wrong committed in single fornication 1. They offer wrong and dishonour unto Christ in making the members of Christ the members of an harlot 1 Cor. 6.15 2. They injurie themselves in sinning against their owne bodies in defiling and polluting them ibid. vers 18. 3. They doe wrong unto their posteritie bringing upon them the shame of bastardie making them illegitimate and disenabling them to inherit 2. If humane lawes should punish fornication it would give occasion unto adulterie incest Sodomitrie seeing the most in a common-wealth are weake and imperfect and if they were restrained from this smaller vice they would fall into greater enormitieâ— Contra. 1. As though God hath not appointed a remedie against fornication and all other uncleannesse by lawfull matrimonie shall men make themselves wiser than God and seeke to cure one evill by another 2. And thus the divine order is perverted among the Romanists for they restraine mariage and give way unto fornication and therefore it is no marvell if among them such unnaturall lusts doe reigne Bernard well sheweth the reason thereof Tolle de Ecclesia honorabile conjugâ—um c. Take away from the Church honorable matrimonie he saith not take away harlots and brothel houses as Tostatus doth shal ye not replenish it with incestuous persons with concubinaries Sodomiticall vices c. supeâ— Cant. serm 66. 3. Humane lawes are not to forbid all sinnes because Homo legem ponens non potest dare gratiam praeservativam c. because man making a law cannot give preseruing grace to keepe it and this was the cause why Lex Mosis non prohibâ—bat omnia vitia Moses law did not forbid all vices because therein was no grace given or helpe ministred to avoid them therefore some things were permitted among them as to take usurie of the Gentiles to give a bill of divorcement and such like So Tostatus quaest 23. Contra. 1. By this reason humane lawes should forbid no sins because Gods word not mans law giveth grace to abstaine from any sin 2. Neither is there any sin forbidden in the new Testament against the morall law which is not prohibited in the old as it may appeare by our blessed Saviours interpretation of the law Mat. 5. wherein he giveth no new law but only expoundeth the old 3. Though Moses law gave no grace to keepe it yet because it was a Schoolemaster to bring us unto Christ Gal. 3.19 it was fit it should be a perfect law and containe a strict rule of all righteousnesse that men the rather should bee driven unto Christ seeing themselves to come so farre short 4. The toleration of some things among the Israelites for their hardnesse of heart sheweth not a defect in the law but an imperfection in them that could not bee subject to the perfect rule of the law 5. And concerning the punishment of fornication it was not omitted in Moses law for although fornication with one were recompenced with marriage and paying of the dowrie Deut. 22.24 yet if a daughter in Israel did play the whore she was stoned to death ibid. vers 21. And seeing the law saith There shall not bee a whore of the daughters of Israel Deut. 23.17 how dare any defend the tolerating and suffering of whores in a Christian Common-wealth 4. Morall observations 1. Obser. Against shamelesse adulterers that thrust themselves into the Congregation of the Lords people THou shalt not commit adulterie This sin being so haynous in the sight of God whereby both the ordinance of God is perverted and matrimoniall faith mutually given violated and the Temples of the holy Ghost defiled hereby their impudencie unshamefastnesse and profanenesse is evident that being guiltie of this sin dare presume to come into the Lords house to offer themselves to heare the Word to receive the Sacraments or communicate in any other exercise of religion against whom the Prophet thus enveigheth Will you steale murther commit adulterie c. and come and stand before me in this house whereupon my name is called and say wee are delivered though wee have done all these
abominations Ierem. 7.9 Chrysostome well sayth to this purpose Non est locuâ— hic lupanar sed Ecclesia si membra meretricis habes abesto ab Ecclesia ne praesentiâ tuâ sordescat This place is no brothelhouse but the Church if thou hast the members of an harlot absent thy selfe from the Church lest it be defiled by thy presence c. homil 62. super loan 2. Obser. Against fornication ANd let not onely adulterers take heed unto themselves even fornication between those that are not married is a grievous offence before God who will not onely judge adulterers but whoremongers also Hebr. 13.4 And that saying of the Apostle may bee applied against fornication as well as adulteries Know yee not that yee are the Temple of God c. if any man destroy the Temple of God him shall God destroy 1 Cor. 3.16 Whereupon Augustine thus writeth Non vis corrumpi domum tuam quare corrumpi◠〈◊〉 Dei Thou wouldest not have thine house corrupted or defiled why then doest thou corrupt the house of God lib. dâ— in chord cap. 9. And these mischiefes fornication bringeth with it 1. Perdit animaâ— The fornicator destroyeth his owne soule Prov. 9.18 Hee knoweth not that the dead are there and that her guests are in the depth of hell 2. Consumit substantiam He consumeth and wasteth his substance Prov. 6.16 Because of the whorish woman a man is brought to a morsell of bread 3. Vilificat prolem It maketh their posteritie vile and base as the Apostle sheweth Otherwise were your children uncleane 1 Cor. 7.14 that is without mariage 4. Privat honore c. It depriveth of honour and purchaseth an everlasting blot Prov. 6.32 Hee shall find a wound and dishonour and his reproach shall never bee put away Thomas in opuscul 3. Obser. Against disguising of the bodie and uncomely apparell AVgustine sheweth how this Commandement is otherwise transgressed by light behaviour disordered apparell disguising of the bodie Habitus impudicus corporis est nuntius adulterini cordis The unshamefast behaviour of the bodie is the messenger of an adulterate heart Superflua inordinata capilatura vestimentorum muliebrium affectata similitudo as Superfluous and inordinate haire and affectation of womens garments c. And in women Fucatafacies capillorum nativi coloris adulteratio A painted face colouring of the haire imitating the fashion of mens garments c. August serm 347. The one S. Paul reproveth in men 1 Cor. 11.14 Doth not nature it selfe teach you that if a man have long haire it is a shame unto him The other S. Peter reprehendeth in women As their broydred haire and gold put about and the putting on of apparell 1 Pet. 3.3 The eighth Commandement 1 Questions discussed QUEST I. Whether the stealing of men only bee forbidden in this precept Vers. 15. THou shalt not steale R. Salomon is of opinion that only the stealing of men is prohibited here because that kinde of stealth onely was punished by death other kinds of theft by restitution either of double or quadruple Contra. 1. It doth evidently appeare that all kinde of theft and not that of men onely is here forbidden by these two reasons first because the Morall law only as grounded upon the law of nature did binde both Iewes and Gentiles the Judicials only concerned the Israelites therefore if other thefts had beene restrained only by the Judicials and not by the Morall law the Gentiles would not have condemned the stealing of goods as well as of men as they did Secondly the Judicials did only binde the people after they were delivered unto them not before but it was a sinne to steale in Israel even before they had received the Judicials 2. The ground of his opinion is not found that the breach of every morall law was punished by death for the coveting of a mans ox or asse though this coveting had proceeded to act was not judged worthie of death Tostat. qu. 24. QUEST II. Of the order and phrase used in this precept THou shalt not steale 1. Next unto those wrongs which either are done unto a mans single person as in offering violence to his life or in persona conjuncta in his coupled and conjoyned person namely his wife in committing adulterie next after follow those injuries which concerne his substance and such things as appertaine unto him Thomas in opuscul 2. And first of all prohibentur nocumenâ—a quae infertimiur facto those hinderances are forbidden which are done in fact then those quae inseruntur verbo which are done in word as in 9. precept Thou shalt not beare false witnesse Lyran. 3. But here this word theft is more generally taken quà m apud juriscâ—nsu tos than among the Lawyers Borrah for it signifieth quamlibet alienae rei usurpationem any kinde of usurping of that which is another mans Gloss. interlinear 4. And the reason why all violence fraud circumvention is prohibited under the name of theft is Furandi verbum posuit quod ut probrosâ—m omnibus naturaliter exhorrent He useth the word stealing which all men by nature doe abhorre is ignominious that we might the better be perswaded to abstaine from all kinde of theft Calvin For men cunningly doe glose and colour their vicious and corrupt dealing with honest names as fraud and deceit is called wit and cunning getting of other mens goods providence The Lord therefore to meet with all such daubing doth call things as they are and sheweth how that before him all such wrong-doers are held guiltie of theft QUEST III. Of the generall heads of the things here prohibited THree things in generall are forbidden in this Commandement 1. The unjust getting of other mens goods which is 1. Either by rapine or violence either of sacred things or of prophane and common 2. Or else by theft and pilfring 3. Or by deceit circumvention and fraud 2. All dammages discommoditie or hinderance which either is brought upon another by hatred evill will enmitie or else which is not turned aside and declined from our brother it being in our power 3. The abuse of mens goods and substance is likewise here condemned either in the evill bestowing and expending of them in vaine and unprofitable things or in the unjust holding and possessing and not imploying of them when necessitie requireth Simler QUEST IV. Of Sacrilege THe first generall transgression then is in sacrilege which is the stealing either of any sacred thing appointed for holy and sacred uses out of any place sacred or prophane or of any prophane and common thing out of a sacred place And this sacrilege is of two kinds it is either of things spirituall or of things externall and temporall of this latter sort are these 1. The wilfull stealing and withdrawing of such things as are ordained to holy and divine uses which kinde of sacrilege is strictly punished by humane lawes Such was the sinne of Achan in stealing the wedge of gold and the Babylonish garment which God had
no concupiscence is mortall 2. There can be no reasonable coveting of another mans things for reason is grounded upon the law of nature against the which such concupiscence is therefore the coveting of our neighbours goods being a transgression of this morall precept is in it owne nature mortall but through Gods mercie in Christ both it and all other sinnes to the faithfull are veniall and pardonable and not otherwise 4. Confut. That Marie was not void of originall sinne and concupiscence FUrther Thomas Aquin hath another position Post peccatum propter corruptionem nullus evadit concupiscentiam praeter Christus virgo gloriosa c. After sinne entred because of corruption none can escape concupiscence beside Christ and the glorious Virgin Thom. in opuscul So the Rhemists All men are borne in sinne Christ onely excepted and his mother for his honour Annotat. Rom. 5. sect 9. Contra. 1. The Apostle saith Rom. 3.19 Whatsoever the law saith it saith to them which are under the law that every mouth may be stopped and all the world be culpable before God But Mary was under the law and culpable before God as others were Ergo the law also saith to her Thou shalt not covet 2. Againe the same Apostle saith The law was our schoolmaster to bring us to Christ that we might be made righteous by faith Galath 3.24 But Mary was made righteous by faith for shee calleth Christ her Saviour in her song Luk. 1.47 Therefore the law also was a schoolmaster to her to bring her to Christ. 3. S. Paul further saith Ephes. 2.3 We were by nature the children of wrath as well as others He speaketh generally of all the faithfull therefore even Mary was by nature the childe of wrath and consequently borne in originall sinne 4. Divers infirmities are discovered in Scripture in the Virgin Mary as Luk. 2.48 her finding fault with Christ Matth. 12.46 her interrupting of Christ in his sermon Ioh. 2.2 her prescribing of the time to Christ to shew a miracle in turning the water into wine when Christ rebuked her saying Woman what have I to doe with thee All these infirmities doe shew that Mary was not void of originall sinne And therefore upon these reasons and testimonies of Scripture we inferre that Mary was conceived and borne in sinne as others are and Christ onely is excepted of whom onely the Apostle saith He was in all things tempted in like sort yet without sinne Heb. 4.15 As Origen also well saith Solus Christus sine macula Onely Christ was without spot Homil. 1. in Levit. See more also of this question Synops. Centur. 2. err 79. 5. Confut. Against the Romanists that it is impossible in this life to keepe the law of God NOw whereas the law restraineth the very inward concupiscence and corrupt desire herein appeareth the perfection of the law and how impossible it is for any in this life to keepe the law of God perfectly as the Apostle saith Rom. 7.14 We know that the law is spirituall but I am carnall sold under sinne There are two reasons why it is not possible to keepe the law both because it is spirituall not restraining onely the externall act but the internall spirituall motions and so is a most perfect rule of righteousnesse and for that we are on the other side imperfect full of weaknesse and corruption and carnall Here then is discovered another error of the Romanists That the precepts and commandements of God unto a man justified and in the state of grace are not impossible to be kept Concil Trident. sess 6. can 18. First then the truth concerning this point shall briefly be opened and then their objections answered First here we are to consider a fourefold state and condition of man 1. As he was created in a perfit state before his fall when it was possible for man to have kept the law and to have conformed himselfe in perfit obedience to the will of his Creator 2. But man considered in his corrupt nature before he be regenerate and restored can by no meanes keepe the law as the Prophet saith Can the blacke moore change his skinne or the Leopard his spots then may yee also doe good that are accustomed to doe evill Iere. 13.23 So the Apostle Whatsoever is not of faith is sinne Rom. 14.23 And We are not able of our selves to thinke any thing 2 Cor. 3.5 3. In the restored estate of man by regeneration and new birth the law is partly possible to bee kept partly impossible It is possible two wayes first by the imputation of the righteousnesse of Christ who hath fulfilled the law for us for he needed not fulfill it for himselfe as hee suffered not for himselfe for he was perfitly holy and just even from his conception communicatione justitiae divinae by the communication of the divine justice Marbach So the Apostle saith Rom. 10.4 Christ is the end of the law that is the fulfilling of the law for righteousnesse to every one that beleeveth Secondly the law is possible to be kept of the regenerate Quo ad inchoationem obedientia internae externa in respect of the inchoation or beginning of obedience internall and externall as the Apostle saith This is the love of God that we keepe his commandements 1 Ioh. 5.3 For he which without this beginning of righteousnesse that is without regeneration saith he knoweth and serveth God is a liar Vrsin This regeneration and inchoate obedience being wrought in the faithfull by the Spirit of God though it doe not wolly extirpate and root out sinne yet it keepeth it so under that it reigne not in them and it so renueth them that they labour to resist sinne and to live according to the law of God which obedience though it bee in it selfe imperfect yet is it accepted of God by faith in Christ in whose perfect righteousnesse whatsoever is imperfect in our obedience is perfected and our imperfections pardoned Marbach Yet even in the regenerate the law is impossible to be kept in respect of that perfection which God requireth and therefore the Prophet David saith Psal. 143.3 Enter not into judgement with thy servant for in thy sight shall none that liveth be justified 1. The faithfull doe both imperfectly keepe the law committing many things against it 2. Even in those things wherein they keepe the law they have some imperfections as the Prophet Isay saith 64.6 All our righteousnesse is as a stained clout Vrsin But there is great difference betweene the regenerate and unregenerate even when they sinne 1. Gods purpose standeth to save the Elect though they sometime slip so is it not with the other 2. Their repentance in the end is certaine so is it not in the unregenerate 3. Even in the sinnes of the regenerate there remaineth yet some seed of faith which is not utterly extinguished nor they wholly given over but the wicked and unregenerate are wholly sold over unto sinne and their
slaine and in the other that it is no breach of the Sabbath when necessitie compelleth to breake the rest thereof 1. This were a dispensation to make it lawfull to kill where one cannot justly be put to death and to worke upon the Sabbath where there is no necessitie 2. And a dispensation maketh that lawfull afterward which was not before such dispensation but it was alwayes lawfull both for the Magistrate to put to death and upon like necessitie to intermit or suspend the rest of the Sabbath 3. Beside these interpretations and declarations of these lawes are not devised by man but warranted in Scripture by the Lord himselfe the maker and author of the law and therefore they are not interposed by any humane authoritie Tostat. quast 35. 4. Morall observations 1. Observ. Why covetousnesse is to be taken heed of THou shalt not covet c. Men must not onely withdraw their hands from taking their neighbours goods but restraine their inward coveting and desire and that for these reasons 1. Propter concupiscentiae infinitatem because concupiscence is infinite the desire of the covetous is never satisfied as Isay 5.8 They joyne house to house c. till there be no more place 2. Aufert quietem it taketh away quietnesse Eccles. 5.11 The satiâ—â—ie of the rich will not suffer him to sleepe 3. Facit divitias inutiles it maketh riches unprofitable Hee that loveth riches shall be without the fruit thereof Eccles. 5.9 4. Tollit justitiâ—â—quitatem it hindreth justice For rewards doe blind the wise and pervert the words of the just Exod. 23. 5. Necat charitatem it killeth charitie both of God and our neighbour therefore the Prophet saith Hide not thy selfe from thine owne flesh Isay 58.7 The covetous despiseth his brother who is as his owne flesh 6. Producit omnem iniquitatem it bringeth forth all iniquitie as S. Paul saith 1 Tim. 6.10 The desire of money is the root of all evill Thom. in opuscul 2. Observ. Of the remedies against concupiscence THe remedies against concupiscence are these Basil assigneth these two 1. Si cogitaveris quòd dissolvendus es in terram cessabit insana concupiscentia c. If thou bethinke thy selfe that thou shalt bee dissolved into earth unsound concupiscence will cease 2. Meliorum desiderium minora cogit contemâ—ere The desire of better things will make thee contemne the lesse as the love to the Word of God which is more to be desired than gold will withdraw our love from earthly things Basil. in regula Thomas Aquiâ— addeth foure remedies beside 3. Occasiones exteriores fugiendo By shunning all externall occasions as Iob made a covenant with his eyes chap. 31.1 4. Cogitationibus aditum non praebendo In giving no way to the thoughts as by humbling and afflicting the bodie as S. Paul did 1 Corinth 9.27 5. Orationibus insistendo By applying prayer as our blessed Saviour saith that even devils may bee cast out by fasting and prayer Matth. 17.21 6. Licitis occupationibus insistendo c. By being alwayes well occupied for idlenesse brought the Sodomites to lust it was one of their sinnes Ezech. 16.49 Thom. in opuscul 3. Observ. How the Lord hath punished the transgressors of his law THou shalt not covet In the last place I will shew how the Lord hath punished and judged the transgressors of this precept and likewise of the rest The punishment then which is due for the transgression of the law is either divine or humane The humane is that which is inflicted by the lawes of men which are divers according to divers usages of countries and conditions of people among whom one vice may reigne more than another and so more severitie is required But this defect generally is found in humane censures that the transgressions of the second table are more severely punished than those of the first and those in the second which doe concerne mans outward state as theft are more straightly punished than adulterie which Augustine found fault with in his time and he giveth this reason of this partialitie Quia id pejus credimus quod huic vitae nocet Because we thinke that the worse or greater evill which hurteth this life Lib. de Mendac cap. 9. The divine punishment is of two sorts it is either temporall in this life or eternall in the next And for the first where humane lawes are silent or connivent in censuring the sinnes of men yet the divine justice sheweth it selfe As now shall appeare in this particular enumeration of divers presidents and examples of Gods severitie exercised and shewed upon the transgressors of his law 1. Pharaoh is set forth as an example of an Atheist and prophane person who would not acknowledge the God of Israel but said I know not the Lord neither will I let Israel goe Exod. 5.2 who manifestly transgressed the first precept his end was to be drowned in the red Sea 2. Senacherib a most grosse Idolater as he was worshipping his Idoll Nisroch in the temple was slaine of his two sonnes 2 King 19.37 3. He which blasphemed the name of the Lord in the host of Israel was by the Lords commandement stoned to death Levit. 24.11 4. The man also which gathered sticks upon the Sabbath because he did it with an high hand and is contempt was stoned by Gods appointment Numb 15.31 5. Abshalom both a disobedient childe to his father and a rebell against his Prince was hanged by the haire of the head and stricken through with darts and so is made a spectacle unto all stubborne children and rebellious subjects that such should expect the like judgement at Gods hand 6. Cain for killing his innocent brother was cast out of Gods presence and made a runnagate upon the face of the earth Cruell Abimelech as he slew 70. of his brethren upon one stone so his braines were dasht out with a stone Iudg. 9. 7. Ammon an incestuous person was slaine by the procurement of his owne brother Abshalom for the deflouring of his sister Thamar 2 Sam. 13. That whore and strumpet Iezabel was eaten and devoured of dogges 1 King 21.23 2 King 9.22.35 And as adulterie is an abomination to the Lord the punishment whereof God reserveth to himselfe where the Magistrates hand is not extended as the Apostle saith Heb. 13.4 Whoremongers and adulterers God will judge So the sinne of drunkennesse and glutâ—onie shall not escape the stroke of Gods hand as being the nurserie and seminarie of filthinesse and uncleane lust Drunken Nabal for that sinne and others joyned withall was smitten of the Lord and died 1 Sam. 25.38 And that rich Glutton who pampred himselfe but was mercilesse toward poore Lazarus was tormented in hell Luk. 16. And here I cannot omit to make mention of a strange judgement of God shewed of late upon three persons for this sinne of excessive drinking which happened upon the 27. day of December last being the Lords day next after the Nativitie in the towne
presume to understand above that which is meet to understand but that he understand according to sobrietie Rom. 12.3 CHAP. XXI 1. The Method and Argument IN the former Chapter was propounded the Morall law chiefly mixed with ceremoniall constitutions in the end of the Chapter now follow the Judiciall lawes unto the 10. verse of the 23. Chapter from thence unto the 20. verse are propounded certaine ceremoniall orders in generall as touching sacrifices and their feasts the more speciall and particular prescriptions concerning ceremonies are at large set forth in the booke of Leviticus This Chapter consisteth of three parts The first is of the manumission and setting at liberty Hebrew servants both men and women unto vers 12. Concerning the man servant these Lawes are given 1. How long he shall serve vers 2. 2. When his wife is to goe out with him when not vers 3.4 3. What is to be done to the servant that will not be made free vers 5. to vers 7. Concerning the maid servant 1. Upon what condition she may be sold to her masteâ— not to be sold againe to a stranger vers 7 8. 2 What is to be done unto her if she be betrothed to his sonne vers 9. 3. What must be performed to her if he marry another wife vers 10. 4. What must be done if he doe not performe these things vers 11. Secondly there follow certaine mulcts and punishments for divers offences committed by man as of murther vers 12 13 14. smiting of parents vers 15. stealing of men vers 16. cursing of parents vers 17. hurting of a man vers 19.18 beating of servants to death vers 18 19. hurting of women with childe vers 22. blemishing of servants in their eye tooth c. vers 24. to 28. Thirdly of mischiefe and dammages that are occasioned by other mens default as by their oxe that useth to push and goare man or woman vers 28. to 33. or hurteth anothers oxe vers 35 36. and of dammages which are caused by the digging of pits and wells vers 33 34. 2. The divers readings Vers. 3. If he came with his body A.P. alone with his body I. If he came in single V. or alone B.G.C.S. The sense is kept not the word better than with what garment he entred c. L. but the word guph signifieth a body as gupha in the feminine is taken Exod. 21.3 Vers. 7. She shall not goe out as men servants B.G.V.I. cum caeter not as maids S.L. Vers. 8. Who hath not betrothed her I.V.A.P. better than betrothed her B.G.C.L. S. for here the negative 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lo is omitted Vers. 8. In dealing deceitfully or perfidiously with her I. or trespassing against her A. better than in despising her B.G.C.L.S. for bagadh signifieth properly to deceive and breake covenant as Malach. 2.10.14 the meaning is he hath broken appointment of marriage with her Vers. 10. Her rayment and dwelling or habitation I.A. conversation S. better than price of her chastity I. or recompence of her virginity G. or duty of marriage B. V. lying with her C. her time P. ghorah of ghâ—r signifieth an habitation or dwelling Vers. 16. And it be found in his hand I.A.P.C.V.G. that is the person which he hath stollen better than if it be proved upon him B. or if he be found in it S. if he be convicted of the fault L. Vers. 22. If no destruction follow B.V.I. or death G. A. P.C. better than if the child come forth without fashion S. or but she liveth L. for it is as well understood of the infant as of the mother if neither of them dye c. 2. Questions discussed QUEST I. Of the necessity of the Iudiciall lawes Vers. 1. THese are the judgements c. 1. After the Morall law followeth the Judicials for the Civill law issueth out of the Morall law which is the fountaine and foundation of all other Lawes And as the Morall law is principally grounded upon the Law of Nature so in the next place the Civill law also floweth from the same fountaine as it may appeare by the generall use thereof seeing no common-wealth can stand without Civill and Judiciall constitutions Borrh. 2. And Moses having propounded the Lawes which binde in conscience so now he setteth forth the Penall lawes whereby the obstinacy of men might be restrained for if a man were left to himselfe Nemo est qui non suo arbitrio mâ—lit vivore there is none that had not rather live as he list himselfe Galas 3. Therefore because it might fall out that all would not be obedient to the Morall precepts necessarium suit praescribere c. it was necessary to prescribe what punishment every transgressor of the Law should be subject unto Rupertus QUEST II. The difference of the Morall Iudiciall and Ceremoniall lawes THe judgements 1. The Judiciall lawes Ceremoniall and Morall are thus distinguished some precepts have vim obligandi ex ipso dictamine rationis power to binde by the very inducement of naturall reason though there were no other Law to enforce them such are the morall precepts some Lawes doe not absolutely binde by the instinct and perswasion of naturall reason sed ex institutione divina vel humana but by a divine and humane institution which if they concerne such things as appertaine unto God are ceremonials if they respect the ordering of men and directing of humane affaires they are Judiciall lawes two things then are required in Judiciall lawes that they concerne ordinationem humanam the ordering and directing of men and that they doe binde non ex sola ratione sed ex institutione not by reason onely but by the institution Thom. 1.2 qu. 104. art 1. in Cor. 2. Now there are foure sorts of Judiciall lawes one of the Prince toward the subjects another of the Citizens among themselves the third of the Citizens toward strangers and the fourth concerning domesticall duties as of the fathers masters husbands toward their children servants wives Thomas QUEST III. How the Ceremonials are abolished FUrther concerning the validity of the Ceremoniall law 1. The Ceremonies were of two sorts either such as were meerely figurative signifying such things as were to be performed in Christ as Circumcision and the paschall Lambe which are in no respect to be observed for this were in a manner to deny Christ to be come if the figures should still remaine in use then the body is yet to be expected 2. There was another sort of ceremonies which doe not directly concerne the signification of Christ to come but only shewed munditiam populi illius sanitatem the cleanlinesse and health of that people as to abstaine from swines flesh which if one should now observe as it was commanded in the Law he sinneth but if for some other end as for his health or such like he offendeth not Tostatus quaest 1. 3. Some ceremonies were partly figurative of things to come and significative of
from her Gloss. interlinear Lyran. But the word ghoâ—ah signifieth no such thing Some read horam her time or houre which some interpret tempus nubendi time of marriage some the time of her service He shall not diminish her wages for her service Ex Lippomanâ— Some debitum conjugale understand and it of the marriage debt jus conjugale the right of marriage Cajetan Vatab. Concubitâ—m this lying with her Chalde so also Augustine Actum matrimonialem The matrimoniall act he shall not defraud her of for they which had many wives did not give unto every one of them their time as may appeare in the story of 〈◊〉 and Lâ—ah who purchased of her sister to Iâ—dge with her husband for her sonnes Mandrakes Genes 30. But beside that this were apparently to allow the use of concubines which no where the Law of Moses doth the word ghonah is not found in any such sense But it rather signifieth cohabitation or dwelling for the word maghon which commeth of the same root ghoa is taken for an habitation or dwelling so read Iun. Oleast Montanâ—â— The meaning then is that he shall allow her her food rayment and cohabitation or dwelling because he hath decâ—iâ—ed her of the hope and expectation of marriage So the Septuagint read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the which word Augustine understandeth 〈◊〉 ubi nâ—m lying with her but it rather signifieth conversation that is he shall suffer her still to cohabite and converse in the house not as his wife or concubine but now as a free maid and no longer a servant QUEST XXXI What those three things are mentioned in the text Vers. 11. IF he doe not these three c. 1. Some expound these three things to be these if the master that bought the maid will not take her for his wife nor give her to wife to his sonne nor yet reteine her as his concubine Ex Lyranâ— But this cannot be for these reasons 1. Because it would follow that it was by the Law allowed to take a maid to be ones concubine which was apparently a sinne and a transgression of the seventh Commandement Thou shalt not commit adultery 2. The sense and sentence should remaine imperfect it being not determined what should be done if hee refused to give her food rayment and dwelling if this clause should be referred not to the three things spoken of immediatly before but to those other there given in instance Tostat. quaest 12. 2. Augustine supposeth these to be the three if he neither marry her himselfe nor his sonne neither have defloured her then she shall goe out free quast 78. in Exod. But there is no mention made at all before of deflouring her but of 〈◊〉 her therefore this cannot be any of the three 3. The most doe make these the three things if he neither take her to wife for himselfe nor for his sonne nor yet suffer her to be redeemed So Macâ—ach Borrh. Lyran. Genevens But this exposition cannot stand 1. Because these three things mentioned must be all performed otherwise he must let her goe out free but these three were divers cases and are propounded disjunctively either the father to marry her or the sonne or to suffer her to goe out free 2. In this sense the text should imply a contradiction for if these severall cases before propounded be these three things whereof one is this that if the father doe not marry her himselfe he shall suffer her to be redeemed that is for money but here it is said she shall goe out free paying nothing so shee should goe out for money and goe out without money 4. Wherefore the fittest sense is and most agreeable to referre this clause to the three things going next before he shall not diminish her food apparell and dwelling Sic Tostat. Iun. Cajetan QUEST XXXII Whether maid servants were set free in the seventh yeere and not sometime before sometime after Vers. 11. SHe shall goe out free paying no money 1. She should be set at liberty not onely in the seventh yeere of remission but before si appareant in ea signa pubertatis if the signes of her womanhood appeared Lyran. And the reason is that if shee stayed still in servitude being apt for marriage and neither her master nor his sonne take her to wife she might be in danger to be defloured or else lose the time of her marriage passing over her virginity in service Tostat. So that such maids might be made free before the yeere of freedome came 2. But if the seventh yeere of redemption returned before the maid came to yeeres of marriage which the Hebrewes doe appoint at twelve then could not the master yet shew his liking or disliking of her and therefore such young maidens were not made free no not in the seventh yeere for all this Law is grounded upon this supposition If shee please not her master that is if he purpose not to espouse her to himselfe or to his sonne but this pleasing or displeasing could not appeare untill the maid were ripe and fit for marriage therefore in this case they expected rather the accomplishment of her ripe age than the approching of the seventh yeere Tostat. qu. 13. QUEST XXXIII The summary sense of this Law concerning maid servants NOw concerning the meaning of this Law in generall 1. Cajetane thus resolveth the whole Law this maid servant that is sold by her father unto her master is either incognita à Domini unknowne of her master or knowne if the first then may he sell her but not to any strange people if she be knowne and afterward displease either her master casteth her off and then he must give her a dowry as if she were his daughter or he purposeth to reteine her still as his concubine then hee shall provide for her meat cloth and dwelling Contra. 1. There is no liberty given to the master to sell his maid servant to whom he will but he must suffer her to be redeemed which was to be done by the next of the kin 2. When he had espoused 〈◊〉 to his sonne it is not like that he would then cast her out of the house and send her away with a dowry but reteine her still 3. And if it should be lawfull for him to keepe her still as his concubine then the Law should allow the use of concubines which is no where to be found 2. Tostatus and Lippoman agree with Cajetane in the first case of suffering the maid to be redeemed admitting that her master had not knowne her and in the two other of giving her to his sonne and of taking another unto her but herein they differ that Cajetane in the second case of espousing her to his sonne presupposeth an ejection and casting out of the maid espoused and so endowing her the other thinke she is reteined still Their errour then is in supposing that this maid is knowne of her master because she must so liberally be provided for But
as here Contra. 1. By neighbour any man whosoever is understood 2. And expresse mention is made here of the will and intention because it is an explanation of the former law Simler 3. Iunius thinketh that not he onely which killeth sed qui conatus est occidere but went about to kill is comprehended in this law as Deut. 19.19 Ye shall doe unto him as he had thought to doe unto his brother Contra. 1. It seemeth by the generall law vers 12. that this constitution is onely for murther committed and not intended onely for such smiting the law speaketh of whereupon death followeth 2. That law given in instance Deut. 19. is touching false witnesses whose false testimonie breaketh out into action into false witnesse bearing so that there is not an intention onely for the false witnesse by his false testimonie acteth as much as in him lieth to take away the life of his brother that place therefore is impertinent to this purpose I approve here rather the judgement of Cajetane Nec describuntur haec intus in animo sed prodeuntia extra in actiones Neither are these things described onely in the minde but proceeding without into action QUEST XLI Of the difference betweene voluntarie and involuntarie murther and the divers kinds of each HEre then there is a manifest distinction of involuntarie and voluntarie murther or killing grounded upon the law of Moses· 1. Involuntarie killing is of two sorts there are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 chances unlooked for and sudden events as when one shooteth an arrow and killeth one unawares as Peleus killed his sonne being in hunting with him There are beside these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 errors and oversights as the father beateth his childe purposing onely to chastise him and hee dieth of that beating a Physition ministreth physick to his patient intending to cure him and doe him good and he dieth of it Borrh. 2. There are likewise two kinds of voluntarie or wilfull murther ex proposito of purpose ex impetu animi in heat or rage These kinde of murthers are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 iniquities one may be slaine ex proposito purposely either per insidias by lying in wait when one watcheth for the life of a man and taketh him at advantage as Ioab killed Abner and afterward Amasa they suspecting no such thing so Ismael killed Gedoliah Ierem. 41. Or els per industriam when one of set purpose picketh quarrels and seeketh occasions to provoke a man that he may kill him both these kinds are touched here Tostat. quaest 16. Then one may bee killed in heat and rage when there was no purpose before as Alexander the Great killed Clitus Pelarg. This kinde though not so grievous as the other yet is a kinde of voluntarie killing So there is extant a constitution of Hadrian the Emperour against him qui per lasciviam causam mortis praebuisset which was the cause of anothers death through wantonnesse and riot though there were no enmitie before that such an one should be banished five yeeres Simler QUEST XLII Why the wilfull murtherer was to be taken from the Altar Vers. 14. THou shalt take him from mine Altar 1. This may bee understood either of the Altar of incense which was in the holy place or of the Altar of burnt offring rather which was without the Tabernacle in the Court for thither every one might easily flee that had committed any such offence but to the Arke no escape could be made because there was no entrance thither 2. R. Salomon saith that this is meant even of the Priest that sacrificed at the Altar who after he had finished his service at the Altar might be taken thence and judged by the law as other malefactors and murtherers Which collection of his may be received saving that it is not like they would suffer a murtherous Priest to minister at the Altar 3. But that other conceit of R. Salomon whom Lyranus followeth hath no good ground that he that had killed an Hebrew wilfully might be taken from the Altar as Ioab was but if he had onely killed a Gentile as a Moabite or Ammonite though of set purpose he was not to be taken thence but was privileged by the Altar But the contrarie appeareth that this law forbiddeth all voluntarie and wilfull murther whether of Hebrew or Gentile for it was more to kill a Gentile being free then a Gentile that was a servant or bondman but the master was to die for it if he beat his servant to death so that he died under his hand vers 20. which law must be understood of strangers and aliens that were servants not of Hebrewes for they were not to deale so cruelly with them Levit. 25.38 Iun. much more therefore were they to die if they of purpose killed any free stranger Tostat. 4. If therefore the wilfull murther as well of strangers as Hebrewes be here forbidden then both for the one murther and for the other might they be taken even from the Altar 5. And the reason thereof was this because they which did flee to Gods Altar eum tanquam patronum judicem innocentiae suae implorabani did sue unto God as the patron and Judge of their innocency therefore they therein abusing Gods name were to be expelled thence Gallas QUEST XLIII What manner of smiting of parents is forbidden Vers. 15. HE that smiteth his father and mother c. 1. The very smiting of the father or mother deserveth death although they die not of such smiting Cajetan Iun. as may appeare vers 12. where is directly expressed concerning the smiting of another if hee die then the smiter shall bee put to death Piscator 2. R. Salomon understandeth that this is not meant of every smiting but when upon the smiting â—he effusion of bloud followeth or some scarre or wound is caused But the very smiting of either of the parents sheweth the malice and disobedience of the childe for the which he is worthie to die as Deut. 21.18 the sonne for his stubbornnesse and disobedience was to be stoned to death Indeed for every blow or smiting the childe was not to die if it were done unwittingly or unawares but if it were done of purpose he deserved death 3. And the reason is because of the authoritie of the parents which is the next unto God Simler Deo parentibus non possumus reddere aequalia c. Wee can never make amends unto God and our parents Cajetan As also they seeme not to be worthie of life which are injurious to those by whom they received their life Gallas QUEST XLIV Of the grievous sinne of paricide THough there be no expresse mention here of those that kill their parents yet it followeth necessarily that if it be a sinne worthie of death to smite them much more to kill them 1. This even among the Heathen was counted so hainous a sinne that they thought none so wicked that would commit paricide and therefore Solon
thinketh that these were not the ordinarie Judges of the Hebrewes sed arbitri constituti ex voluntate partis utriusque but arbitrators chosen by the will and consent of both parties quest 24. But that part of the law which followeth Thou shalt render life for life which is spoken to the Judge to whom the sword was committed sheweth that this authoritie also of setting the pecuniarie punishment is referred to the civill Magistrate QUEST LIX Whether the law of retalion be literally to be understood Vers. 24. EYe for eye tooth for tooth c. 1. Some doe thinke that this law of retalion is not to be understood according to the letter but an estimation was to be made by money so R. Salomon to whom consenteth Tostatus upon these reasons 1. Because in some of these kinds as if a foot should bee taken from him that perished his neighbours foot it might so fall out that together with the foot hee should lose his life and so there should be more than a retalion 2. And againe in the former law vers 18. where one upon anothers smiting lieth downe on his bed but riseth againe the other was onely to beare his charges there the law of repercussion and retalion tooke no place and so is it to be understood here 3. Favorinuâ— thus reasoned against this law of retalion as Aulus Gellius bringeth him in lib. 20. cap. 1. that it was impossible to be kept for if the like should be inflicted for the like as one wound for another they must take heed that the like wound in every respect should be made neither longer nor deeper if it were then a new retalion should bee offered unto the other that prosecuted the action and so there should be no end Contra. 1. The like may bee objected concerning the cutting off of other members as of the eares and hands which are inflicted by the lawes of divers countries for divers times death followeth in the amputation of such parts and yet the law intendeth not death He then may thanke himselfe that deserved such mangling of his members neither is the severitie of the law to give way because of some inconvenience which is feared And yet further thus much may bee added that where in such tetalion death was like to follow where death was not intended that in this case much was left to the discretion of the Judge that compensation might bee made in another kinde as by pecuniarie satisfaction 2. The other instance is not to the purpose for the law speaketh of such hurting when as there is no losse of any member for in that case they are referred to this law but when the body was otherwise hurt and bruised without any corruption of the parts and members then the smiter in that case was to beare his charges that rested and lay upon his bed by his meanes 3. The other objection is frivolous for it was not in the private mans hand that was wounded to make what wound he thought good againe but it was in the Judges power to order it 2. Therefore the more probable opinion is that this law is literally to be understood that he which had spoiled his neighbours eye hand foot should suffer the like himselfe as may appeare by these reasons 1. Because the first clause here set downe vers 23. Thou shalt pay life for life is literally intended not that he should pay mony for his life but he should lose his life indeed 2. Our blessed Saviour so expoundeth this law Matth. 5.38 Yee have heard it hath beene said an eye for an eye c. which libertie being given unto the Magistrate onely every private man did arrogate to himselfe to seeke revenge as he thought good and therefore our blessed Saviour correcteth that error But I say unto you resist not evill c. Now if this retalion and recompence had beene made in money and not in inflicting the like hurt they had not resisted evill or sought revenge 3. Other forren lawes also borrowed this law of retalion from Moses as among the Romanes in their twelve tables this law is extant Si membrum ruperit nisi cum eo pacit talio esto c. If he have broken a member unlesse he agree with him let there be a retalion 3. Yet this law is so literally to be understood as that it was lawfull notwithstanding to turne the like punishment into a pecuniarie mulct Iosephus thinketh it was in his choice that was hurt whether hee would be satisfied in money or have the like punishment inflicted So also Bâ—rrhaius But it is not like that it was left wholly to his choice but that it rested in the Judges discretion as before in another case the womans husband was to set the summe but the Judges were to moderate it vers 22. 4. Therefore it is like that it was in the Judges power to award either the like penaltie or a compensation in money as afterward vers 29.30 If a mans oxe used to gore chanced to kill any the owner was to die or pay a ransome of money And the reasons of this commutation are these The difficultie in the strict law of retalion that it could hardly alwayes be observed according to the letter as if hee were weake and sickly that was to lose a member he was like to lose his life also with it and if a poore man had lost an arme it was more profitable for him to have amends made him in money than to have anothers hand cut off and if the Judge should upon every ones humorous desire have taken away from one an arme or a legge this would have nourished revenge It is like then upon these reasons that the Judges as they saw cause did make a change and commutation of this penaltie with money as the Pretors did among the Romanes 5. Yet although it were in the Judges power to make a commutation of the like punishment with a pecuniarie mulct the law of retalion notwithstanding is set downe 1. Both for more certaintie because one rule could not serve for all pecuniarie taxations which might be aggravated or diminished in the discretion of the Judge according to the divers circumstances 2. As also if a mulct of money had beene set then the mutilation of the members being not warranted by the letter of the law could not have beene inflicted 3. As also this severitie in the amputation or cutting off the like part doth imprint a greater terror than if any summe of money though never so great had beene imposed Simler QUEST LX. Whether the law of retalion were just and equall BUt against the law of retalion it will be thus objected 1. That sometime there may be great inequalitie in the persons and then such equall and like requitall is not just as if a subject should smite a Magistrate and wound him it is not sufficient for the other to be wounded againe And in the law of retalion there is no respect whether one did
given to keeping of cattell their horse were for the most part brought out of Egypt Simler 2. It is understood to be such a goring and wounding as that death followed upon it for otherwise though one were sore wounded with the push of an oxe if he died not the oxe was not in this case to be stoned Tostat. 3. But that other conceit of Tostatus in this place is not so good secus est si calce petierit c. It is otherwise if the oxe strike with his heele not with his horne in this case the oxe is not to die because it was his fault that stood within the reach of the oxes heele whereas he pursueth after men to gore them with his horne for what saith he then to the horse heele if any were stricken to death therewith was not the horse to be killed by the equitie of this law as Lippoman expoundeth it as well de equo calcitroso of a striking horse as of a pushing oxe If this law provideth for the stroke of the horse heele why not for the oxe hee le also And this is yet more evident Gen. 9.5 that the Lord will require mans bloud at the hand of every beast the heele is as well the oxe hand as his horne By what meanes soever then a beast killeth a man this law was to take place QUEST LXIII Why the oxe that goared was commanded to be stoned to death Vers. 28. THe oxe shall be stoned to death c. 1. Though a bruit beast cannot sinne and therefore this punishment is not inflicted for any sinne committed by the beast yet it is in joyned ad horrorem facti for the horror of the fact Tostat. 2. Quia esset horribilis ad videndum c. Because the sight of such a bloodie beast would be horrible and grievous to men Lyran. 3. And it might be feared lest such a dangerous beast if he should live should kill others also Simler 4. This was also provided for the masters advantage who was bound to make good all losses which should fall out afterward by his beast which used to push Tostat. 5. And by this law men are given to understand that if bruit beasts are not spared much lesse shall they goe unpunished if they shed mans bloud Gallas 6. The equitie also of this law herein appeareth that sicut creati sunt boves in hominum gratiam c. That as oxen were created for mans sake so they should serve for the use of man whether by their life or death Calvin 6. Agreeable to this law of Moses as grounded upon the law of nature were the like constitutions among the Heathen as Solon made a law in Athens that if a dogge had bitten a man hee should be tied in an halter and delivered to him that was hurt So among the Romanes in their 12. tables it was decreed that if a beast had done any hurt Dominus aut litis astimationem solvito aut eam noxa dedito The owner should either pay aâ— was awarded or deliver up his beast to punishment Draco also was the author of this law in Athens that not onely men but beasts yea things without life that had beene the meanes of any mans death should be banished out of the countrie and cast out whereupon the image of Theogenes among the Thrasians falling upon one and killing him was adjudged to be cast into the Sea Simler QUEST LXIV Why the flesh of the oxe was not to be eaten ANd his flesh shall not bee eaten 1. It was neither lawfull for them to eat the flesh themselves nor yet to sell it to the Gentiles as they might doe other things that died alone Deut. 1â— 21 Iun. But the flesh should be cast away as a cursed and abominable thing 2. Not so much because being stoned to death it was as a thing suffocated and so they should have eaten it with the bloud Simler Osiander But tanquam aliquid maledictum c. as a thing accursed they were to abhorre the flesh of such a bloudie beastâ— so that although the owner should slay this murtherous oxe before it were stoned it was not lawâ—ull to eat the flesh thereof Tostat. quaest 30. 3. And this was tum propter horrorem factâ— both for the horror of the fact tum quia per hoc damnificabatâ—â— Dominus bovis and by this meanes also the owner of the oxe was damnified the flesh thereof being unprofitable for any thing that he might be more â—autelâ—â—â— afterward and take better heed to his cattell Lyranus 4. The Hebrewes addâ— further that the very skin of the oxe was not to be used to any purpose but the whole to be cast away as a thing abominable Tostat. quaest 28. QUEST LXV In what case the owner is to die when his oxe goared any to death Vers 29. IF the oxe were wont to push c. Another case is put when the oxe chanceth to doe any hurt with the masters knowledge where divers conditions are required 1. That the oxe used to push before the words are in the originall yesterday and yeâ— yesterday a definite time is put for an indefinite it is noâ— enough if he had once goared before but he must have one it twice at the least as R. Salomon Lyran. He must have beene knowne in former time to have beene used to push 2. This also must have beene notified and signified also to the owner for it may be that the oxe had used formerly to push and the owner knew it not Simler Or if he knew it he might denie it unlesse he had beene admonished by others to take care of his beast Tostat. quaest 28. 3. He or she must be free and not a servant whom the oxe used to push goareth to death for concerning the goaring of servants there followeth another law afterward vers 32. If the oxe goared a man or woman a sonne or daughter that is though they were never so little it was all one Lyran. Some thinke it is understood of the owners owne sonne and daughter Calvin Oleaster But the next law as touching the goaring of servants sheweth that it is rather meant of his neighbours sonne or daughter Hugo de S. Victor But it is rather understood in generall de quo viâ— capite libero of every free bodie great or small man or woman Iun. 4. In this case the owner being warned before of his oxe is to die for it because he did not keepe him in knowing him to be a harmefull beast Quia videtur illud quasi immittere aliorum cervicibus because he seemed of purpose to let him loose to doe mischiefe Simler QUEST LXVI When the owner might redeeme his left with money Vers. 30. IF there be set to him a summe of money 1. R. Salomon thinketh that in this case the next of kin to the partie slaine were to take a peece of money of the owner of the oxe and they could not refuse but might be compelled to take it and
so he taketh here si if for quia because Contra But the very letter of the law is against this exposition for it is expresly said The oxe shall be stoned and the owner shall die also But if the owner might at his libertie redeeme his life with money then he should never be put to death and so that clause of the law should be superfluous Tostat. quaest 29. 2. Neither yet is Tostatus opinion here to be received Quandoque posuit in electione cognatorum c. That the law doth put it in the choice of the kinsmen of the slaine when they would demand the owner to die and when they thought good to set him a summe of money and so hee maketh this a different case from that vers 22. where the Judges were to set the summe of money because it was no capitall offence but here he is to pay whatsoever is required by the adversarie part without any moderation or limitation of the Judges because the offence being capitall cannot be valued or esteemed by any certaine summe of money Tostat. quast 28. Contra. But this is not like that this was left to the choice of the adversaries for either they might set such an unreasonable summe which the owner was not able to pay or else might use partialitie that in the very like case some owner should die when another should escape with his life and so the law should not be equall and indifferent to all 3. Some thinke that it was in the Judges discretion to change the sentence of death into a pecuniary mulct concedit lâ—x quòd possit Iudex decernere c. The law alloweth the Judge to determine c. Cajetan Lippoman thinketh that the adversaries were to make the demand praevia tamen non iniqui Iudiciâ— moderatione c. yet by the moderation of an indifferent Judge going before But if it were altogether arbitrarie in the Judge when a man should die in this case when not to what end saith the law The owner shall die also In that case then there propounded he was certainly to die which sentence by the Judge could not be dispensed with 4. Therefore I thinke rather with Iunius that in this mitigation of the former sentence of death a divers case is put from the former that if the owner of the oxe non satis scivit did not sufficiently know it vel non satis cavit or did not take heed enough thinking he had sufficiently provided for his beast that in this case he might be excused Si simplick as vel incogitantiâ— hominem excusaâ—â—t if the mans simplicitie or forgetfulnesse did excuse him c. so that he were not found to be wilfully negligent and carelesse the Judge might set him at a summe of money Calvin QUEST LXVII What servants this law meaneth Hebrewes or strangers Vers. 32. IF the oxe goare a servant or maid 1. Some thinke this is generally meant of all servants among the Hebrewes where lesse respect is had unto servants than unto free men Vt cura libertatis major vigeret in populo Dei c. That there should be more care had of libertie among the people of God that they come not through their owne default into servitude and bondage Lippoman 2. But it is rather understood of such servants as were Gentiles and strangers and not Hebrewes as may appeare by the former lawes vers 20.26 which are onely referred unto that kinde of servants Iun. For in all kinde of percussions and wrongs offred to the bodie or life the Hebrew servants had the same privilege which free men had Againe Tostatus addeth this reason because if he were an Hebrew servant that was killed the money should not be given to his master but so much onely as his service remaining might be valued at the rest was to goe rather to his children or kindred as put the case that his service were esteemed at foure sicles yearly and there remained but one yeare of his service before the seventh yeare came then his master was to have but foure sicles of the thirtie sicles But because the Gentile servants were their masters perpetuall possession the whole summe which the servant was valued at that perished belonged unto them Tostat. quaest 3. QUEST LXVIII Why a certaine summe of money is set for all servants Vers. 32. HE shall give unto their masters thirtie sicles The common sicle weighed the fourth part of an ounce of silver so that thirtie sicles made seven ounces and an halfe that is so many dolleâ—â— seven crownes starling and an halfe Iun. which is about 37.s. 6.d. of our money Now although there was great difference in the price of servants for the men servants were more worth than the maids and the young and strong than the old and weake yet a certaine rate is set for these reasons 1. Some thinke this proportion and summe is named because out of Cham there issued thirtie generations Gen. 7. from whom servitude tooke beginning But this is but a figurative reason which rather belonged to the ceremoniall than to the politike lawes Tostat. quaest 29. 2. These reasons rather may bee yeelded 1. That whereas the summe for the death of a free man is arbitrarie vers 30. but the certaine quantitie is named for a servant slaine by a beast this was to shew a difference betweene servants and free men Cajetan 2. Quia caedes erat involuntaria c. Because this slaughter was involuntarie and the owners negligence onely is punished therefore one servant is not set at an higher rate than another Simler 3. And beside this moderate and indifferent price is taxed that the owner of the oxe and the master of the servant might as it were divide the losse betweene them that seeing it was done of negligence non multum gravaretur in solvendo Dominus bovis The owner of the oxe should not be burthened with over great payment Tostat. quaest 29. QUEST LXIX What kinde of wells this law meaneth where and by whom digged Vers. 33. WHen a man shall open a well or digge a pit c. 1. Here are two cases put when either one uncovereth a well digged alreadie or diggeth a new well and leaveth it uncovered then he is subject to this law Lyran. For if one made a well and left it covered and another commeth and uncovereth it though he made it not now he is in fault and not the other that made it quia causam immediatam tribuit malo because hee is the immediate cause of the evill or mischiefe that is done Tostat. qu. 30. 2. Rab. Salomon thinketh that if the master commanded another to make a well and leave it uncovered that in this case he is not to make good the losse but he that made it Contra. If he that made it were a servant who could not gainsay his masters commandement in this case the master was rather to be charged with the penaltie than the servant because he was the cause but if
how the Lord is affected to the seventh day of rest that in remembrance thereof he also privileged the seventh yeare for the freedome of servants and the fiftieth yeare of Jubile Oleaster Whereby we are taught religiously to consecrate unto Gods honour the seventh day 2. Doct. Of Gods providence even in such things as seeme to fall out by chance Vers. 13. BVt God hath offred him into his hand Discamus non casuâ— aut fortunae istos occursus attribuere sed providentiae supremi Iudicis c. Let us learne saith Cajetane hereupon to attribute such occurrents not unto chance or fortune but unto the providence of the highest Judge Even these accidents which seeme to fall out by chance are ruled and governed by the providence of God as our blessed Saviour saith that even our haires are numbred and therefore nothing can happen unto us otherwise than as God disposeth 3. Doct. The fact is to be measured by the minde of the doer Vers. 13. IF a man have not laid wait Vides externa facta non esse judicanda juxta externam facti speciem c. You see that outward facts are not to bee judged according to the externall shew sed juxta internum facientis animum but according to the inward minde and purpose of the doer Lippom. As God saith to Abimelech when he had taken Sara Abrahams wife I know that thou didst this even with an upright minde Genes 21.6 4. Doct. In all wrongs there must be satisfaction and restitution made Vers. 19. HE shall beare his charges The injurie must be freely forgiven but yet there must be recompence and satisfaction made for the losse and hindrance so likewise vers 34. The owner shall make it good The law sheweth that restitution must be made for the hurt and damage made unto another Oleaster Therefore a man cannot looke for remission of his trespasse from God which he hath committed against his neighbour where he refuseth to make him amends it being in his power so did just Zachtus restore fourefold whatsoever he had wrongfully gotten Luk. 19.8 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Of the Anabaptists that denie the use of the sword unto the Civill Magistrate Vers. 14. THou shalt take him from mine Altar that he may die This place doth authorise and warrant the lawfull power of the Civill Magistrate in the use of the sword against the error of the Anabaptists which would altogether deprive the Magistrate of it urging that place in the Gospell Matth. 5.39 I say unto you resist not evill But here our blessed Saviour repealeth not the law of Moses An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth but onely reverseth the corrupt exposition of the Pharisies which by this text would give warrant unto privat men to seeke their owne revenge whereas the law giveth this power onely unto the Civill Magistrate So the Apostle also saith that the Magistrate heareth not the sword for nought for he is the minister of God to take vengeance on him that doth evill Rom. 13.4 2. Confut. Against the Papists that would exempt Ecclesiasticall persons from the Civill power Vers. 14. THou shalt take him from mine Altar Even the Priest ministring at the Altar if he had committed wilfull murther might be taken from thence and put to death by the Magistrate as R. Salomon noteth wherein appeareth the soveraigne right and power which then the Civill Magistrate had over the Priests of the law which Tostatus granteth but he saith that herein there was great difference betweene the Priests of those times and of ours and thereupon he putteth this note in the margen Nota differentiam inter Sacerdotes veteris Testamenti nova legis note a difference betweene the Priests of the old Testament and of the new law Tostat. quaest 16. Contra. 1. But herein is no difference at all for the Ministers of the Gospell are no more exempted now from the Civill power than the Priests were then for the Apostle saith Let every soule be subject to the higher power Rom. 13.1 In this generall speech none are excepted yea our blessed Saviour who might have pleaded a greater privilege in this behalfe then any refused not to pay tribute for avoiding of offence Matth. 17.27 See more of this question Synops. Centur. 1. err 98. 3. Confut. Against the great abuse of Popish Sanctuaries FRom mine Altar This sheweth that the Temple and Altar as also the Cities of refuge were privileged places for some kinde of offenders though not for wilfull murtherers Here then somewhat would be inserted concerning the great abuse of Sanctuaries and privileged places in times past 1. Concerning the beginning and first occasion of them it is grounded upon and derived from the judiciall constitutions of Moses who by Gods appointment assigned certaine Cities of refuge for some offenders to flee unto but not for all malefactors from Moses the Gentiles seemed to borrow the like custome in giving immunitie and privilege to some places As in Athens Hercules nephewes builded the Temple of Mercie and obtained for the same this privilege that they which fled thither for succour should not by violence be taken thence In Rome Remus and Romulus betweene the tower and the Capitol appointed a place of refuge called intermontius betweene the hilles after that the Temples and Altars and then the images of the Emperours were privileged to give protection to those which fled thither for succour And from this example came the like immunities which were given afterward to the Churches of Christians which was afterward enlarged unto Church-yards and Monasteries As this reason is alleaged in the Imperiall constitutions of Theodos. and Valentin that because the Gentiles gave such honour to their Idoll temples c. Quantum oportet praesidii ad sacratissimas aras confugientibus praestare How much reliefe ought we to yeeld to those which flie to the most holy Altars The same reason is yeelded Concil Matiscin 2. can 8. Simundani Principes suis legibus censuerunt c. If worldly Princes have decreed by their lawes that whosoever did flee unto their images should be without hurt how much should he remaine undemnified qui suae gremium matris Ecclesia petierit c. which goeth to the bosome of his mother the Church 2. Now for the convenient and necessarie use of such Sanctuaries and privileged places these reasons are brought 1. That they which were innocent as in the case of involuntarie killing might rescue themselves from the rage of the pursuers 2. They which were oppressed by unequall Judges might finde shelter here till either the Judges wrath were appeased or a more indifferent Judge found 3. Such places served for the reliefe of servants that were cruelly handled of their masters 4. And for such as were endebted and were pursued of their cruell creditours and exactours 5. And in time of warre such places were of speciall use that they which fled thither might be preserved from the sword As
to the owner But concerning other goods no such restitution was to be made Gallas Lippom. Contra. They are herein deceived for the former generall Law maketh mention of oxen asses sheepe and generally of whatsoever is lost wherein any fraud may be committed 2. Cajetane and Simlerus give this reason because the other Law speaketh expresly of things stollen out of the keepers or depositories house which the owner made choice of for the sure keeping of his goods and therefore if they be stollen it is upon his owne perill because he made no better choice of the place Now living creatures are not committed to the safe keeping of the place but to the keepers diligence and care so that if they be stollen it is through his default and negligence To the same purpose also Calvine But this reason giveth not satisfaction because in the other Law vers 9. mention is made also of oxen asses sheepe and other living creatures 3. This then is the difference that the former Law speaketh of things committed freely to ones trust without any consideration or reward but here of such things which a man is waged or hired to keepe and therefore in this case he is to make good that which was stollen and not in the other Cujus ratio est quia pro custodia habet mercedem The reason is because he had a reward for his keeping Lyran. Tostat. And this appeareth yet more evidently by Iakobs practice Genes 31.39 Laban required it of his hand whether it were stollen by night or by day because he waged with Iakob to keepe his sheepe Iun. Gallasius objecteth against this example that Iakob there had boasted in vaine quod solus ista damna pertulisset that he alone had borne these losses if it had beene an ordinary thing so to doe Contra. Iakob in that place to purge himselfe of all suspition of fraud or negligence alleageth two things one that whatsoever was torne he brought it not to Laban as the manner was but made it good himselfe and herein Iakob did more than he was bound to doe the other is concerning Labans strictnesse that required of him that which was stollen wherein Laban did according to the common use but yet his hard dealing appeared in exacting of his sonne in Law as of a stranger QUEST XIV How the case of theft differeth from other casualties in matters of trust Vers. 10. IF it dye or be hurt or taken away by enemies c. 1. In these cases the keeper was not to make restitution as if it were stollen the reason is because these casualties could not by humane diligence or foresight be prevented as the other might Simler So Thomas Depositivum poterat perdi dupliciter ex causa inevitabili c. The thing committed to ones trust might be lost two wayes either by a cause inevitable which could not be shunned or prevented and the same either naturall as by disease and death or externall as if it were taken of the enemy or devoured of wild beasts or the cause might be evitabilis such as might be prevented as in stealing 2. But such casualty and death is here understood as is not procured by the deceit and craft of the keeper as if he defrauded the beast of his meat or overwrought it or if it became lame and broken by his smiting and abusing of it for in these cases the keeper is to make good the losse yea though he had nothing at all for the keeping he was to make recompence if any kinde of way he had put his hand to his neighbours good vers 8. much more now seeing he was waged for the keeping and so here he is to take his oath that he hath not put his hand to his neighbours good that is that none of these casualties did befall by his default 3. And by these particular accidents which cannot be prevented other like unexpected and inevitable chances are understood Casus fortuitus non imputatur depositorio A case falling out by chance bindeth not the depositorie or keeper in trust though he have somewhat for the keeping as if the house be burned where he laid up anothers goods or the ship suffer wracke wherein such goods were embarked unlesse one of these three culpa pactum mora interciderit the keepers fault some compact or delay come betweene for if the casualty fall out by the keepers default or negligence or he have covenanted to make good what losse soever or keepe the goods longer in his hand than the owner agreed with him to keepe them in all these cases the keeper is bound to make satisfaction what chance soever happeneth Tostat quaest 7. QUEST XV. Whether it were reasonable that the matter should be put upon the parties oath Vers. 11. AN oath of the Lord c. 1. This kinde of probation to put a man to purge himselfe upon his oath was used when no other witnesses could be produced as it is added in the former verse and no man saw it that is alius à custode none beside the keeper Oleaster so that where other proofe might be had a man at the first should not be put upon his owne purgation Tostat. 2. Neither need it seeme strange that the controversie should be decided by the keepers oath for no man will commit a thing to another in trust unlesse he were first well perswaded of his honesty Suo ergo praejudicio testatus est eum esse virum bonum He therefore testified by his fore-judgement of him in trusting him that he is a good man Calvin and therefore it is no wrong unto him to have the matter tried by his oath whom he trusted 3. Here wee see the lawfull use of an oath to be an end of all controversie and strife as the Apostle sheweth Heb. 6. when no other proofe can be had Tostat. 4. And it is called the oath of Iehovah because they only are to sweare by the name of God Genevens QUEST XVI What was to be done if the thing kept in trust were devoured of some wild beast Vers. 13. IF it be torne in peeces he shall bring it in record 1. One way to testifie that it was torne of wild beasts was to bring a part of the prey recovered out of the ravenous beasts mouth as shepheards sometime used to doe Amos 3.11 Iun. This sense is expressed by the Chalde He shall bring that which is torne for a testimony and the Septuagint He shall bring it to his gate that is shew it to the owner And therefore Iacob herein approved his faithfull service to Laban that used not this liberty to bring that unto him which was torne but made it good himselfe Gen. 31.29 Tostat. 2. Another way to prove it to have beene torne with beasts was to bring proofe by witnesses that saw the ravenous beast to carry away the prey for this sentence hath relation to the former clause vers 10. If no man saw it If then he can bring
fault otherwise not as si fecisset animal illud nimis laborare if he caused the beast which was borrowed to be over laboured Lyran. But in the case of borrowing he is bound not only to make restitution where any thing is lost by his fraud and wilfull default sed tenetur de levissima culpa but for every small fault oversight or negligence is he bound to make satisfaction Tostat. qu. 8. QUEST XX. Whether the fornicator by this Law be sufficiently punished Vers. 16. IF a man entise a maid not betrâ—thed c. 1. This Law enjoyning only unto the fornicator marriage with the virgin corrupted if her father consent may seeme to be too easie and gentle But here it must be considered that in these civill Lawes the punishment is not alwayes answerable to the sin for even the sinne of fornication is one of those which without Gods mercy excludeth out of the kingdome of heaven but the intendment of this Law is to bridle such inordinate lusts and to restraine them that they still increase not Simler 2. And beside it must be considered multa pro ruditate populitâ—lerare that many things in that Common-wealth were tolerated because of the rudenesse of the people Gallas 3. Although the offender by this meanes doe satisfie the politicke Law in marrying the virgin by him corrupted yet coram Deo c. in the presence of God he is not cleared from this offence in making amends by marriage and giving her a dowry Osiander But repentance beside is necessary for the expiation of this sinne 4. The speciall scope of this Law is to provide for the virgin thus abused that shee being made by this meanes unapt for any marriage with another should be taken to be his wife that had done her this wrong 5. The like Law there was among the Athenians that he which defiled a maid should take her to be his wife But among the Romans there was a more severe Law that he which had committed fornication if he were of good sort should be punished in the losse of halfe his goods if of base condition he should be banished Simler 6. This Law is onely concerning virgins not betrothed for to lye with them which were espoused to another was death by Moses Law Deut. 22.23 QUEST XXI Why the women committing fornication be not as well punished by the Law AGaine this Law may seeme to be defective as in laying so easie a punishment upon the man so imposing none at all upon the woman 1. But the reasons thereof may be these the woman might be entised and deceived upon hope of marriage and it was sufficient punishment unto her the losse of her virginity and beside being under her fathers power and so having nothing of her owne shee could not be charged to pay any summe of money as the man is Simler 2. Yet the high Priests daughter if shee played the whore in her fathers house was to be burned because shee had dishonoured her fathers house Levit. 21.9 therefore she is to be excepted out of this Law Tostat. quaest 9. 3. The word patah here used signifieth to decline or turne so that whether he entise the maid blanditiis vel mendaciis by faire promises or by lying words whether he promised her marriage or not he is bound by this Law to take her to wife Oleaster 4. And as this Law is meant for the one party of virgins not betrothed so is it intended on the other part that he must be a single man that is by this Law enjoyned to marry her Iun. If he were married it seemeth he was rather to endow her than marry her because the father would not willingly consent to give his daughter to one that was married already 5. The word shacab signifieth to lye or sleepe non est peccatum dormire cum puella it is no sinne saith Tostatus only to sleepe with a maid if no other thing be committed though he follow the Latine text reading and sleepe with her it is better therefore to read lie with her Iun. Vatab. QUEST XXII What kinde of dowry this Law speaketh of HE shall endow her There is difference betweene Dos the dowry and donatiâ— propter nuptias the marriage gift or joynture this is not meant of the joynture which the man should make his wife but of the dowry which the father used to give in marriage with his daughter as may appeare by these reasons 1. The endowing of the wife is inflicted hâ—re as a punishment the man for his fault is enjoyned to doe that which otherwise he was not bound to doe but the husband alwayes bestowed upon his wife a marriage gift therefore this Law meaneth he shall beare also her dowry which his wife should bring with her or her friends give with her 2. If it were understood of the joynture or marriage gift it had beene superfluous to say he shall endow her and take her to wife for in taking her to wife the husband was of ordinary course to bestow on her a marriage gift or joynture 3. If he have her not to wife her father not consenting yet he was to pay her dowry vers 17. that is not a joynture or marriage gift but that portion which her friends used to give with her Tostat. qu. 9. QUEST XXIII How this Law differeth from that Deut. 22.29 SOme make this Law all one with that Deut. 22.29 where the man which defiled a maid is enjoyned to pay 50. sicles to her father which R. Salomon thinketh to be the certaine dowry of a virgin and so they say that there is duplex dos una qua datur uxori alia quae datur patri a double dowry one which is given unto the wife the other unto her father Lyran. Simler Gallas Lippom. But these two appeare to be divers Lawes 1. This case is put when a man entiseth a maid and she consenteth and is willing therewith but there the Law speaketh of the violent taking of a maid Iun. Tostat. 2. There the summe of 50. sicles is paid to the father for the wrong done unto his daughter it is not given in the name of a dowry for there could not be any certaine rate or summe of money appointed for every maids dowry some might give 1000. sicles with their daughter others not thirty therefore that summe of 50. sicles is not prescribed here but it is said in generall He shall pay money according to the dowry of virgins that is according to their state and condition as dowries used to be given with virgins and maids of like parentage calling and birth for a poore maid had not so great a dowry as one of noble stocke and high degree 3. The maid by violence first defiled and then taken to wife by that Law could never be put away Deut. 22.30 but no such thing is mentioned here he that taketh a maid to wife whom with her owne consent he before defiled might according to the generall liberty then
usurer or exacter unto him that is as such an one which professeth himselfe to bee a banker and usurer 2. They to whom money may be lent upon usury must not be of the poorer sort for to such is simply forbidden to lend upon usury vers 25. To lend then unto the rich for some profit is not against this precept But here three kindes of persons are to bee considered to whom money is to bee lent some are so poore that they are not able to render againe that which they receive some are rich and have no need in regard of any necessity to have any thing given or lent some are betweene both who are able in time to repay that which they lend but yet upon some urgent occasion are driven to borow of these specially this law speaketh that unto such as are constrained to take money for their necessity as either to pay their rent or to save the forfeiture of a bond or to redeeme a morgage to such wee are bound to lend freely without any recompence To the first we ought to give rather than lend Deut. 15.11 Because there shall be ever some poore in the land therefore I command thee saying Thou shalt open thy hand to thy brother to thy needy and to thy poore in the land Vnto the third sort namely the rich wee are not bound to lend freely as unto the poorer sort neither is this against the rule of our blessed Saviour Lend looking for nothing againe Luke 6.35 For of the poore we should not expect any thing but lend freely yea if their necessity be urgent and our estate can beare it the case may be such as that wee ought to forgive them the principall and all Marbach So then of the first we must neither looke for increase nor principall but give unto them of almes of the second we may expect the principall but not any interest of the third wee may receive both And yet this properly is no usury but rather a gratuity that hee which hath gained by anothers mony should to shew his thankfull minde make him which was the occasion thereof a reasonable partaker of his gaine Gratitudo animi lege naturali mandatur This gratitude and thankfulnesse of minde is commanded even by the law of nature Borrhaius 3. The interest which is received must be moderate not excessive Yee shall not oppresse him with usury the word is neshech biting it must not bee a biting nipping or devouring usury The Imperiall lawes gave great liberty to take what usury soever was agreed upon as before is shewed quest 43. yea they allowed hemiola or sescupla to take halfe so much as the principall which are called sequialtera usura usury to the halfe part as for ten Bushels of corne to exact fifteene as may appeare by the law of Constantine But this kind of usury is directly forbidden in the Nicen Councell So the lawes of this land doe moderate excessive usury to take above two shillings in the pound and ten in the hundreth is a forfeiture both of the principall and interest 4. This consideration given for the loane of money must not be ex pacto it must not be agreed upon by any certaine compact and covenant as the words here are lotesimur non imponetis ei you shall not impose or lay upon him usury As it is not lawfull to covenant with a man certainly to pay so much he may lose by using the money hee may bee in hazard also of the principall for the lender then to receive a certaine gaine where the borrower is a certaine loser were not just Such indifferency must bee used as that the borrower be contented as to be made partaker of the gaine that commeth by his money so also proportionably to beare part of the losse These former rules observed and circumstances considered I see not why all receiving of increase by the use of money should bee condemned And herein I mislike not Calvins conclusion Vnde sequitur usuras hodie non esse illicitas nisi quatenus cum aquitate fraterna conjunctione pugnant Whence it followeth that usury now is not unlawfull but as it impugneth equitie and brotherly conjunction and society Likewise Gallasius Quare non vidâ—â— quare omne pecunia emâ—lumentum sive usuram sine ulla exceptione damnemus Wherefore I see not wherefore wee should condemne all profit or usury of mony without all exception Simlerus to the same effect Comrâ—ctus ubi frâ—â—r non lâ—ditur per mutuum charitati non repugnat Such contract where the brother is not hurt by lending is not against charity 5. But it will be thus objected on the contrarie against all kind of gaine and increase that commeth by money 1. In taking money for the use of money one selleth that which is not in his power for the use of money consisteth in him that receiveth it 2. It maintaineth idlenesse when men are suffered to live of their money without the sweat of their browes 3. It is against nature that money being not apt to increase should beget money 4. It was forbidden and prohibited to the Israelites to take usurie of their brethren saving onely of the Gentiles And Psal. 15.5 Ezech. 18.17 all kind of usurie and increase is condemned 5. Our blessed Saviour biddeth to lend looking for nothing againe Luke 6. Answ. 1. Though another man use the money which is lent yet the lender is the occasion thereof and in the meane time he wanteth the use of it himselfe therefore it is not unjust that a thankfulnesse be acknowledged for the use thereof which the other is the cause of 2. Such as live only of letting of money and make a trade of it are not to be suffered but such rather which by that meanes are relieved and cannot otherwise be conveniently maintained as orphanes strangers exiled persons as before is shewed 3. Money of it selfe begetteth not money but being employed by mans industrie it is a fit meanes to increase ones stocke so neither is a field fruitfull of it selfe unlesse it be tilled Ambrose indeed saith Vsurae arte nequissima ex auro aurum nascitur c. By the wicked skill of usurie gold is begotten of gold c. He speaketh of vnjust and insatiable usurie when as the usurer will extort his interest compounded for he careth not at whose hand rich or poore whether he gaine by it or not for so it followeth in the same place nec finis unquam nec satietas aderit cupiditati c. there will be no satietie or end of coueting c. 4. That was a politike law given unto the Israelites as it may appeare by that they were permitted to take usurie of the Gentiles that by this meanes they might grow rich and the other poore And the speciall intendment of the law is that they should not oppresse any especially the poore by usurie which is also now held to be unlawful In those places objected
against God Lippoman 7. As Princes are not to bee reviled so yet they may bee soberly and discreetly admonished not taunted or checked or malepertly rebuked Augustus was wont to say In libera civitate liberas esse linguas oportere That in a free city tongues ought to be free But herein the lenitie of those Christian Emperours Theodosius Honorius Arcadius was admirable who would have them subject to no punishment which spake evill of them for say they Si ex levitate profectum est contemnendum si ex insanla miseratione dignissimum si ab injuria remittendum If it come of lightnesse it was to be contemned if of madnesse to bee pitied if of wrong to bee remitted Gallas 8. There is here no punishment set for him that should raile on the Magistrate but seeing he that railed on his father and mother was to die for it chap. 21.17 much more worthie of death was he which should curse the Prince the father of the countrie Simler QUEST LII Whether S. Paul transgressed this law Act. 23. when hee called the high Priest painted wall and whether in deed he did it of ignorance BUt here by the way somewhat would be added concerning S. Pauls fact in calling Ananias the high Priest painted wall and afterward being told that he reviled Gods high Priest he excused himselfe by his ignorance alleaging this text Act. 23.4 5. 1. Some here answer that where he saith God shall smite thee thou white or painted wall that it was no imprecation but a prediction that God would punish him Genevens And in saying I knew not that he was the high Priest his meaning is Non se attendere debuisse quis ipse sit c. That he was not to regard what he was but what the Lord commanded him Marbach But if S. Paul had knowne him to be the high Priest and yet had spoken evill of him he had alleaged a text against himselfe neither can any extraordinarie motion or instinct of the spirit be pretended in stirring him up to doe an act against the law for God is not contrarie to himselfe 2. Some thinke that Paul speaketh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it were in mockage hee did see nothing in him worthie of the Priesthood and therefore did not acknowledge him to bee the high Priest Calvine Gallas Or because the Priesthood was now determined and abolished in Christ that hee did usurpe upon an office that belonged not unto him But this cannot stand neither for if S. Paul had knowne him to bee the high Priest though hee were an usurper or unworthie that place yet occupying that roome and place hee would have reverenced him for his place sake for even evill Magistrates are not to bee deprived of that honor which belongeth to their office as S. Paul said to Festus who had objected Too much learning maketh thee mad I am not mad O noble Festus he giveth him his title of honour though he were a partial Judge And Cyprian to this purpose saith Quamvis in falsis spoliatis Sacerdotibus umbram tamen ipsam inaâ—era Sacerdotalis nominis cogitans dixit c. Although in false Priests now spoiled and robbed of their place yet he considering the vaine shadow of the verie Priests name said I know not brethren c. Hee saith that Paul reverenced the very shadow and shew of the Priestly authoritie in them 3. Some thinke that Paul reverenced his place knowing him to bee the high Priest but taunted his person But Paul could not have reverenced the place and Priesthood but hee must needs also have given some honour to the man qui illo praeditus erat which bare that place and office Calvine 3. Procopius his opinion is this Paulus seipsum reprehendit colligit cum liberiâ—s invectus fuisset in summuni Pontificem Paul doth reprehend and recover himselfe having too freely inveighed against the high Priest But S. Paul in this place railed not at all for then he had offended against his owne doctrine Ephes. 4.29 Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouthes Though S. Paul had not knowne him to be the high Priest yet hee was not to revile nor speak evill of any 5. Iunius opinion is that Paul was utterly ignorant indeed that hee was the high Priest because he was a stranger and the high Priest was not discerned by his priestly apparell but when he went into the Temple Iunius further seemeth to thinke that Paul did not know him so much as to be a Judge for the Tribune or Captaine of the souldiers was the chiefe in that assemblie and the rest stood by on their feet 6. But it appeareth that Paul knew him to sit as Judge as hee saith Thou sittest to judge me according to the law c. But in the rest I subscribe unto his judgement that Paul non ironicè loquitur sed simpliciter spake not ironically but simplie and plainely that he knew him not to be high Priest and yet hee confesseth no error for hee railed not at all Nam longe differt justa reprehensio à maledicta A just reprehension farre differeth from rayling Gallas There are then two parts of Pauls answer for as they objected two things that he railed and that upon the high Priest so he answereth to the latter part excusing it by his ignorance that hee knew him not to bee the high Priest to the other hee also maketh answer out of his judgement and knowledge denying that hee had railed for hee knew well enough by the law that no ruler of the people ought to bee railed upon therefore S. Paul knowing him to siâ— as a Judge though hee was utterly ignorant that he was the high Priest had sinned against his owne knowledge if hee had railed upon him So indeed as Cyprian saith Nihil contumeliose locutus est adversus sacerdotem Hee spake nothing contumeliously against the high Priest c. QUEST LIII What is understood here by abundance and licour Vers. 29. THine abundance or plentie and thy licour The Hebrew word signifieth teares 1. Some by the word melea fulnesse understand wine because it floweth abundantly by the other word dimah teares oyle because it is pressed forth by drops like unto teares Vatablus But in this sense the principall part of their fruits and increase should have beene omitted namely their corne and other dry fruits 2. Some by fulnesse understand the plentifull yeere by teares the barren yeere signifâ—ing that even then when they had the least increase they should remember to pay their first fruits and oblations Cajetane But this seemeth too curious 3. Calvine will have plenitudinem fulnesse taken pro genere in generall for all kinde of increase and teares to be referred to one speciall kinde namely the licour 4. But D. Kimhi his exposition is more currant and R. Salomon agreeth with him whom Lyranus and Iunius follow that by fulnesse wee are to understand the ripe drie fruits and by teares the
said to rest when we cease from labour so the earth is said to rest when wee forbeare labouring therein Againe because the earth when it is plowed to bring forth fruit sendeth out the strength and nourishment thereof which is abated and weakened by continuall bringing forth of fruit for which cause wee see by experience that Husbandmen doe let their grounds lye fallow and rest to gather strength therefore in this respect also it is said to rest Tostat. qu. 9. And although by this rest of the seventh yeere both the earth waxed stronger for to beare fruit afterward and the beasts also of the field were provided for yet this was not the speciall end of this seventh yeere of rest but these were the reasons of the institution thereof 1. That the poore might by this meanes be liberally provided for when they might freely without any let reape the fruit of the ground of vineyard and olive trees Tostat. 2. It was a benefit also to the servants who this yeere were set at liberty and as they had every weeke a day of rest so now they have every seventh yeere a whole yeere of rest and intermission 3. Beside the rich hereby were taught to moderate their greedy desire in gathering and laying up the fruits of the earth without any end Gallas And in this yeere the rich man tooke care as well as the poore What shall I eat Therefore the Lord would teach them by experience what the state of a poore man was 4. This also was a type and figure of their spirituall rest in Christ which should be accomplished in the kingdome of God as this seventh yeere of rest was made perfect and full in the yeere of Jubile Simler QUEST XX. What the poore lived upon in the seventh yeere BUt here a further question ariseth what the poore did eat this yeere and that which they left the beasts of the field did eat 1. Augustine is of opinion that they did sow the seventh yeere as they did in the six yeeres yet they did not reape or gather their fruit this yeere but left it to the poore But this is against the text here for six yeeres they are bidden to sow and gather their fruits but the seventh to let it rest therefore there here being an apparent opposition betweene the six yeeres and the seventh in the seventh they were neither to sow nor reape but it is yet more evident Levit. 25.4 in this seventh yeere the Lord saith Thou shalt neither sow thy field nor cut thy vineyard And so it is the opinion of Iosephus and generally of the Hebrewes and with them consent Lyranus Tostatus Simlerus with others that the land did rest upon the seventh yeere from all manner of labour and tillage for it would have seemed an hard thing to the stiffenecked Hebrewes if they should have sowed and others reape 2. Cajetane thinketh that the poore lived by selling of such herbes as grew of their owne accord that yeere in the field vendebant eas ex earum pretâ—â— viveâ—â—â—â— they sold them and lived of the price of them but the text saith The rest of the land shall be meat for you Levit. 25.6 they then did eat of that which grew in the field 3. Wherefore they lived not only of the herbes which grew in the fields but of the fruit of vines and olives and other fruitfull trees Beside they had a kinde of harvest of the seed which was shed the former yeere as in some countries yet that are fruitfull the seed which was left after harvest doth bring forth abundance Gallas Simler and therefore it is said Levit. 25.5 That which groweth of it owne accord of thy harvest thou shalt not reape c. 4. And beside this common provision which came of it selfe out of the ground which as well the owner as the poore and strangers gathered for their use Levit. 25.6 the fruits of the sixth yeere were by Gods promise in such abundance as that they served for three yeeres the sixth seventh and eighth till the ninth yeere Levit. 25. vers 21 22. QUEST XXI Whether the seventh yeere were generally neglected in Israel 490. yeeres together as Tostatus thinketh NOw concerning the observation of this seventh yeere of rest Tostatus hath here a singular opinion by himselfe that it was neglected generally of the Israelites for the space of 490. yeeres and kept only during the time of 380. yeeres as he thus would gather from the going up of the Israelites out of Egypt till the captivity of Babylon under Nabuzaradan Nebuchadnezzars chiefe Captaine he counteth yeeres 867. which are thus divided from their departure out of Egypt unto the building of Salomons Temple were 480. yeeres 1 King 6.1 from the which he would have abaâ—ed 40. yeeres the time of the Israelites being in the wildernesse so there remaine 440. from the building of Salomons Temple untill the captivity he counteth 427. yeeres more so the whole maketh 867. of this time 490. yeeres they neglected the seven Sabbath of yeares and therefore they were 70. yeeres in captivity for omitting 70. Sabbaticall yeeres which fell out just in 490. yeeres as it is said 2 Chron. 36.21 To 〈…〉 of the Lord by the mouth of Ieremy untill the land had her fâ—ll of Sabbaths for all the dayes that 〈…〉 desolate she kept Sabbath to fulfill seventy yeeres Tostat. quaest 1â— Contra. 1. But it is not like that this observation of the seventh yeere of rest was so long time or generally neglected for part of this terme of 490. yeeres will reach Davids reigne for all the yeeres of the reignes of the Kings after David untill the captivity make but 440. the other 50. yeere will comprehend all Davids reigne and ten yeeres before some part whereof might extend to 〈◊〉 time but it is not like that such an evident Law under those faithfull Prophets and Kings would have beene omiâ—ted altogether 2. In the corrupt times under the idolatious Kings it is true that this yeere of remission was neglected as may appeare Ierem. 36.8.14 when as the King and Princes proclaimed liberty to their servants according to the Law and afterward revoked it againe for the which the Prophet thâ—re sharply reproveth them Neither would the faithfull Prophets of God have spared to tell the Princes and people of this great negligence if that the Sabbaticall yeere had altogether beene discontinued 3. In Hezekiah his time this yeere of rest was not intermitted for while the City was besieged by Senacherib for two yeeres together the land brought forth fruit without sowing 2 King 19.29 which blessing was conditionall in respect of their keeping of the seventh yeere of rest Levit. 25.6.21 They therefore enjoying the promised blessing did in all likelihood performe their due obedience 4. Beside captivity is threatned for the neglect of their Sabbaths of all sorts Levit. 26. â—5 both the Sabbath of dayes of weekes of moneths yeeres and seven yeeres It is as like that they
other feasts of the Reconciliation in the â—0 day and of Tabernacles which began in the 15. Osiander But here I approve rather Calvins reason Gravin fuisset tam diuturna mora So long abode together at Jerusalem had beene burthensome for the space of three weekes together from the first day of the seventh moneth to the 21. when the feast of Tabernacles ended therefore this third time of their going up was against the feast of the Tabernacles as is evident Deut. 31.10 and that these were the three times in the yeere is directly mentioned Deut. 16.16 These three times in the yeere shall all the males appeare c. Tostat. quaest 25. QUEST XXXV Who were bound to appeare before the Lord whether their servants Vers. 17. SHall all thy men children appeare 1. The women were not bound by this Law to appeare because it was necessary that they should be left at home to attend the domesticall affaires and have a care of the young children yet they might come up voluntarily as Anna the mother of Samuel did and Marie the mother of our blessed Saviour especially those which dwelt neere to Jerusalem 2. Concerning the males Tostatus thinketh that all the males after they were come to yeeres of discretion ascended as Christ being but a child according to the custome of other children went up with his parents But it is more like that none went up under 20. yeere old only those males qui iraâ—sibant sub censum which passed under the account Calvin Some thinke also none above 50. yeeres but that is not like the children might goe up with their parents also but that was not of any necessity And left it might have seemed a dangerous thing to the countrey if all the males together should have beene absent the Lord promiseth that their enemies should not desire their land in the meane time while they appeared before the Lord Exod. 34.24 3. Neither were the males of their owne children only bound to goe up but their servants also as is expresly mentioned Deut. 16.12 that their sonne daughter servant and maid should rejoyce with them before the Lord. Of their Hebrew servants there was no question because they were of the same profession and they were but their servants for a time And concerning other servants bought with their money they were to circumcise them and then they were to eat of the Passeover Exod. 12.44 Now if they were circumcised they were thereby bound to keepe the whole Law as the Apostle sheweth Galath 5.3 And seeing they also were to eat the Passeover which could not be offered but before the Lord Deut. 16.2 they were also necessarily to appeare before the Lord. 4. But if all their servants were bound to goe up with them thrice in the yeere and that from the furthest parts of the land this would seeme to have beene a great prejudice to their masters and an hindrance to their businesse to spare their servants so long Lyranus and Tostatus here answer that they which dwelt farre off were dispensed withall and it was sufficient for them to come up only once in the yeere at the Passeover But no such dispensation is extant in the Law I rather insist upon that other answer of Tostatus that damna animae plus vitanda sunt quà m damna corporis the detriment of the soule is more to be shunned than the detriment of the body Therefore seeing their appearing before the Lord concerned the health of their soules all worldly respects ought to give place unto it and the Commandement of God was to be preferred before all Tostat. quaest 26. QUEST XXXVI To what end the people were commanded to meet together THis generall meeting of all Israel thrice in a yeere before the Lord was profitable for divers ends 1. Ad concordiam religionis doctrinae conservandam c. To keepe and preserve concord and unity in doctrine and religion Simler for if they might have sacrificed where they would the people might soone have declined and fallen to strange worship 2. Ingenti multitudinis concursu alii alios incitabant c. By this concurse of the multitude one helped to stirre up and provoke another to the more cheerefull setting forth of the praise of God Gallas 3. It was effectuall also Ad coalitionem animorum c. For the knitting together of their hearts and mindes the maintaining of love and charity among them Marbach 4. Solemnia festa angustiora fieri tanto conventu The solemne feast dayes by this company of the people were thereby more adorned and set forth 5. And this was a figure also of Christ that as they had but one Sanctuary one Altar on high Priest so Christus est unicus servator Christ is our onely Saviour and high Priest Simler QUEST XXXVII Why the people were not to appeare empty before the Lord. Vers. 15. NOne shall appeare before me emptie 1. Though this precept be annexed here to the solemnity of the Passeover yet it is to be referred not only to that feast as Tostatus seemeth to take it but to all the rest of the three Cajetane Gallas 2. Some understand it thus that none should appeare empty or in vaine before the Lord but they should receive some blessing at his hand but it is plaine Deut. 16.17 that it is meant of such gifts and oblations as they should bring with them to offer before the Lord Simler 3. Which offerings and oblations served for the repairing of the Temple and the maintaining of the Levites and for other such uses belonging to the service of God Simler 4. This presenting of gifts unto the Lord was to testifie their thankfull minde Non enim satis erat verbis gratitudinem testificari For it was not sufficient in words only to testifie their thankfulnesse Gallas And to this end they did it ut personarum rerum fiat Deo oblatio qui dat personas res omnes that they might offer unto God as well their substance as their persons who giveth all both the persons and all things beside Cajetane 5. Though we are not bound unto this Law seeing it is abolished veritas tamen aâ—uos pertinet yet the truth thereof belongeth unto us Gallas that if wee have money or any other substance we should first releeve the poore tunc demum Deo preces fundamus and then offer our prayers unto God Saltem animam non à boâ—is operibus vacuam Deo offeramus c. At the least we should not present our soule unto God empty and void of good workes Theodoret. To the same purpose Chrysostome idcircò pauperes ante fores sunt ut nemo vacuus ingrediatur c. intras ut misericordiam consequaris prior ipse miserere c. Therefore the poore stand at the Church doore that none should goe in empty thou encrest to obtaine mercy first shew mercy thy selfe c. Gregorie applieth it to the appearing before the Judge at the latter day
so Tostatus thinketh that in this place it may be taken indifferently pro decoctione vel assatione for boiling or rosting but the kid could not in this literall sense be rosted in the mothers milke though they might imagine it to be boiled therein 2. Augustine objecteth thus Quid si mortua matre ejus ab alia oâ—e lactaretur What if the owne dam being dead another ewe gave it sucke it could not be then sod in the mothers milke Lyranus therefore understandeth it de omni lacte of any milke whatsoever But now they which presse the literall sense by this meanes are forced to depart from the letter 3. Againe there is the same reason of other young things as of fowles and of birds as there is of the young of beasts but they cannot be sod in the dammes milke and yet they might be abused as well as other young things therefore these words doe restraine such an abuse about meats as is incident to the flesh of fowle as of cattell The conceit then of Andreas reported by Lyranus hath no ground that it must be understood de carnibus animalium c. non de carnibus avium of the flesh of cattell that are nourished with milke not of the flesh of birds 4. Concerning that superstitious rite of Idolaters there is no certainty of it Horace indeed maketh mention of offering milke unto Sylvanus the god of the fields in this verse Tellurem porco Sylvanum lacte piabant They appeased the goddesse Tellus with a swine and Sylvanus with milke But whether they offered a kid sod in milke it is not certaine and so Tostatus confesseth quaest 37. 5. Neither is that any good reason why it should be taken precisely according to the words because it is thrice rehearsed for in all those places it may well beare another sense more fitting and agreeable as shall be even now shewed 6. This pressing of the literall sense hath given occasion to the Jewes receiving herein the exposition of their Rabbins of great superstition for hereupon the Jewes to this day refraine to boile any flesh at all in milke or to dresse or prepare cheese and flesh together because it is made of milke nor to cut flesh and cheese with the same knife Gallasius neither will they eat cheese after flesh nisi bene perfricuerint dentes unlesse they have thorowly rubbed their teeth before 4. Some therefore not finding how to give a fit sense of the words doe flee unto allegories Augustine saith Hoc quomodo observetur ad proprietatem aut non est aut non elucâ—t c. How this should be observed according to the propriety of the words either it is not at all to be found or else it appeareth not Therefore he approveth that mysticall and figurative sense in referring it to Christ Quod hac prophetia praedictus est non occidendus infans c. Who is foretold by this prophecie that he should not be killed in his infancie when Herod sought to slay him c. The same figurative application followeth Thomas But Augustine addeth further that it may be applied to the time of Christs passion who suffered about that same time of the yeere when his mother began to be conceived with him and women are said ex quo conceperint lac colligere from the time they conceive to gather milke c. But neither of these senses can fitly agree unto Christ who is called the lambe that was slaine but not the goat Some insist upon a morall sense as Rabanus by the goat understandeth the sinner who must not be sod in his mothers milke Id est non purgandus mediocribus Ecclesiae disciplinis sed austerioribus praeceptis That is he must not be purged with the mild discipline of the Church but with austere precepts Procopius and Lippoman following him doe make a quite contrary application Infantes in negotio Christi impossibile est ducere per ignem tribulationes c. They that are infants in the faith of Christ cannot be lead thorow sire and tribulation c. tolerandi non opprimendi sunt they must be tolerated not urged And this uncertainty there is in mens collections when every one followeth his owne sense 5. Wherefore the meaning is no more but this they should not bring for the first fruits of any cattell any kid or other beast dum est adhuc lactea while it is yet but milke that is before it be seven dayes old And as they were not to offer such unto God so neither to use it for their private food Deut. 14.21 Iun. Piscator And this to be the meaning may appeare because here and Exod. 34.26 this precept is annexed to the Law of first fruits and yet more evidently it is explained chap. 22.30 where having made mention of the offering of the first fruits of their oxen and sheepe this is added seven dayes it shall be with his damme which may serve to explicate this clause that so long it is but as the dammes milke till it be eight dayes old And as they were not to offer any such young thing to the Lord so neither privately were they to use any such delicacie in feeding of young and tender things which were but yet as milke and froth which precept is given them not so much ut curam haberent valetudinis that they should have care of their health Marbach Deus his legibus altius spectavit For God in giving these Lawes looked to higher matters therefore by this Law cohibetur intemperantia both their intemperancie is restrained Gallas humanitas clementia commendatur and humanity and clemencie even toward the brute beasts is commended For they which are cruell toward beasts are for the most part cruell also toward men Simler therefore among the Athenians boyes that pricked out the eyes of crowes were punished and Domitian among the Romans that flye-killer proved a savage tyrant and killer of men Pelarg. QUEST XLIV Who is understood here to be this Angell Vers. 20. BEhold I send mine Angell before thee 1. Cajetane understandeth this Angell to be Moses but that cannot be for he brought not the people into the land of Canaan as this Angell should and did vers 23. Simler And this Angell should not spare their misdeeds vers 23. but Moses often spared their iniquities and prayed for them chap. 34. Oleaster But Cajetane addeth further that Moses should have brought them into the land of Canaan but that ipse peccando impedimentum praestitit he procured the let himselfe by his sinne and so this is to be understood conditionally But Tostatus taketh away this answer Prophetia cum impletur secundùm divinam praedestinationem intelligitur Where a prophecie is fulfilled it must be understood not conditionally but according to Gods certaine predestination And therefore seeing here the Lord brought them by his Angell into the land of Canaan and yet he did not bring them in by Moses it followeth
all other kinde of punishment whatsoever Cajetan And this their health is expressed by these actions of life as Hagar argueth her life by another action of life Gen. 16.13 I have seene after him that seeth Iun. So also Gallas Simler 7. Before they were sprinkled with bloud Gods hand was in some sort upon them in terrifying them Whosoever touched the mountaine should die But now after their sprinkling they are cheared and refreshed and are not forbidden the sight of God which signifieth that we onely have accesse unto God by the bloud of Christ Rupertus Ferus QUEST XXV Whether this were a new commandement or the other mentioned vers 1 2. repeated Vers. 12. ANd the Lord said unto Moses c. 1. Some thinke that this is the same commandement repeated which was given unto Moses before vers 1 2. Iun. Tostatus addeth further that when the Lord said to Moses vers 2. Moses himselfe alone shall come neere to the Lord that Moses then 〈◊〉 know that he should goe up to receive the Tables for to what end should Moses have gone forth of the campe accompanied with Aaron and the rest if it had not beene to some end qu. 15. Contra. Yes it was sufficient that God called Moses and bade him come up into the mount though he at the same time had not shewed the end of his comming as chap. 19.24 when God bade him come up the cause is not shewed why he was called the Commandements of God are simplie to be obeyed though it please not the Lord alwayes to shew a reason thereof 2. Wherefore I thinke rather that this was a divers commandement from the former and given him at a divers time Piscator Osiander 1. Cajetane reason is Mandat non solùm ascendere in montem sed morari in eo He biddeth him not onely to come up into the mountaine but to abide there c. which was not said to him before 2. Calvin addeth further that after Moses with his companie were gone up and had seene this vision Altius evehitur Moses c. ut cognoscerent c. Moses is carried up higher that they should know that Moses would have gone no further but at Gods commandement c. It was requisite therefore that Moses should bee called againe and sequestred from the rest that he might not bee thought to have presumed without a warrant 3. Severus maketh a mysterie of it that Moses being gone up with Aaron and the rest Iterum aâ—diâ—â— heareth againe come up And by these two ascendings hee understandeth the two senses of the law the literall and spirituall 4. Ferus maketh this application of it Hic jam tertio vocatur Moses in montem c. Moses is the third time called into the mount to shew that he which is set over the people of God ought often to ascend in prayer 5. Rupertus also understandeth here two ascendings using this reason It is said before vers 9. that Moses and Aaron with the rest ascended but not that they ascended unto the Lord as here the Lord saith Come up to me c. So also Hugo de S. Victor Come up to me which must be so understood that De colle in quo erat ad altiora montis procedâ—ret c. From the hill where he was hee should proceed higher into the mountaine QUEST XXVI What is signified by Moses going up to the mountaine COme up to me into the mountaine 1. Beda draweth this place unto a mysticall sense Moses is called up to the mountaine Vt ex altitudine loci colligat quà m excelsa sit lex That by the height of the place he should gather how high and removed from humane capacitie the law was which he was to receive As our blessed Saviour in the Gospell called his Apostles into the mountaine Matth. 5. and after his resurrection he also appeared in the mountaine when he gave commission to his Apostles to goe and preach the Gospell to all the world but here is the difference because the law which Moses was to receive was but given unto one people therefore Moses onely was called up but the Gospell being appointed to be preached to all the world Christ called all his Apostles to him up into the mountaine 2. Rupertus maketh this ascending up of Moses into the mount a figure of Christs ascending up unto God Non in montem terrenum sed in ipsum coelum Not into an earthly mountaine but into heaven to receive not the killing letter but the quickening Spirit as the Apostle saith He ascended up on high led captivitie captive and gave gifts unto men c. 3. Ferus doth thus moralize it that he which will behold God and give himselfe to contemplation must terrena haec inferiora despicere c. despise these inferiour and terrene things as Moses leaving the campe below ascended up into the mount QUEST XXVII Of the tables of stone whereof they were made and wherefore given Vers. 12. I Will give thee tables of stone 1. The fabulous Jewes imagine that these tables of the law were made of the Saphire a pretious stone Lyran. and that when Moses had broken them comming downe from the mountaine he gathered up the fragments and broken peeces and sold them whereby he was greatly enriched Thus these blinde Jewes are not ashamed to blemish their great Prophet Moses with the note of covetousnesse from the which he was most free Tostat. quaest 16. 2. As frivolous is that other conceit because they are said to be of stone that the tables were but one stone which sometimes seemed but one sometime two for in that they are called tables it sheweth they were more than one of one stone they might bee both that is of one kinde of stone and yet the tables were two 3. These tables of stone were created of God for that speciall use as Exod. 32.16 they are said to be the worke of God it is not improbable that they were noviter creata created of God anew as Tostatus but it is not like that they were written by the Angell which Tostatus thinketh to have spoken in Gods person in the mount for as God prepared the tables themselves so hee caused the writing they were the worke of God for the matter and the writing of God for the manner Exod. 33.16 4. All the lawes which God gave his people were not there written but onely the morall precepts the rest Moses writ sustained in the dayes of his flesh Pelarg. 2. This fast was kept by Moses and the like by 〈…〉 Christi idoneum haberet 〈…〉 That the humanitie of Christ might have a sufficient testimonie for unlesse Moses and Helias had fasted fortie dayes some might have doubted of the humanitie of Christ in holding out so miraculous a fast So Rupertus and Ferus following him 3. And these fasted to this end ut tanto miraculo homines mali c. that men being moved by so great a miracle should not contemne their
dicuntur datus aptantur ad offerendum Their hands are said to be filled while they are made fit to offer Quamdin profanae sunt vacuae censentur c. As long as they are prophane they are counted emptie because no gift is acceptable to God nisi jure sacerdotii but in the right of the Priesthood QUEST XLIV Of the fashion and use of the linen breeches Vers. 42. THou shalt also make linen breeches c. 1. Iosephus describeth the fashion of them that they were made of twisted silke or rather linen and first the Priest put thorow his legs and so drew them up to cover his secret parts and tied them about his middle 2. They reached downe from the middle or loynes to the knees they could not be so woven together but were first woven and afterward sewed together with the needle Hierom. 3. The word is micnesaim which is derived of 〈◊〉 which signifieth to tie or gather together as Iosephus interpreteth it Constrictorium a gathering garment or trussing up because thereby the secret parts were trussed together or as Rab. Salomon because the two slops or breeches were tied and knit together about the middle 4. These linen breeches though they are last spoken of were first put on as well of the high Priest as of the inferiour Priests Cajetan 5. These are not mentioned afterward where Moses caused Aaron to put on his Priestly apparell chap. 29.5 and Levit. 8.8 the reason is Quod ad genitalia nostra lex non mittit manum sed ipsi secretiora nostra tegere debemus because the law reacheth not unto our secret parts but we of our selves should cover our privie members Hierom. Because modestie it selfe the garment being once prescribed would put them in minde to weare it it is therefore in those places omitted 6. The use of this garment was for comelinesse to hide their secrets lest while they went about their service in the Tabernacle if they should chance to fall they might discover that which was to be hid Hierom. And beside Tostatus giveth this reason that by the trussing up of those members the inordinate motion thereof might thereby be better stayed qu. 21. And Hierom further addeth why these uncomely parts should not be discovered that it should not appeare to the eye Quomodo de foedissimis initiis tanta hominum nascatur pulchritudo How from such homely beginnings such great beautie in men and other things is brought forth QUEST XLV How this precept and charge concerning the linen breeches agreeth with that law Exod. 23.26 BUt it will seeme superfluous that this kinde of garment should be prescribed seeing before Exod. 20.26 it was provided that they should not goe up by steps unto the Altar lest their nakednesse might be discovered 1. To this question it cannot bee answered that the former law was abrogated by this seeing it was made not many dayes before it may be not above nine or ten or at the most fortie for the first precept was given at that instant when the Morall law was proclaimed and other judiciall lawes prescribed chap. 21.22 23. Then Moses came downe and went up againe and stayed in the mount six dayes and the seventh God called him up and there he stayed fortie dayes in wich time he received all these orders concerning the making of the Tabernacle and of the Priests apparell the former law being not yet put in practice it is not like it was repealed for God is not as men who many times make lawes and afterward seeing the inconvenience doe reverse them And further it is evident that both these lawes stood still in force and were put in practice in the old Testament 2. Wherefore the better answer is this that the nakednesse of a man is taken two wayes either for the secret parts themselves or for the parts next adjoyning so then although the privie parts being thus covered could not be seene in the casting abroad of their garments yet the neare parts thereunto as their knees and part of their thighes being left bare might be seene Therefore that there might be a greater care of comelinesse and decencie a double bar is laid and two cautelous provisions made that neither the one part or the other should be discovered To this purpose Tostat. qu. 20. QUEST XLVI Of the mysticall application of the inferiour Priests garments FOr the mysticall application of these foure Priestly garments the linen coat the girdle bonnet and linen breeches 1. Hierom by the coat made of linen which groweth out of the ground understandeth the earth by the girdle the Ocean sea quo terra constringitur by the which the earth is as it were girded about and by the bonnet aloft Gods providence that watcheth over all But this seemeth to be somewhat curious 2. Rupertus applieth them unto Christ the linen breeches hee would have to signifie the holy incarnation of Christ qua praeornata est natura nostra ignobilis by the which our unable and base nature is adorned and the uncomelinesse of our nature even originall sin covered and healed But as the high Priest with his ornaments was a type and figure of Christ so the inferiour Priests with their attire doe better resemble other sorts of Christians 3. Therefore thus may the ornaments of the high Priest be applied unto Christ The long white garment signifieth his innocencie the miter with the crowne his Kingdome and power the girdle his justice as Esai 11.5 Iustice shall be the girdle of his loines Marbach As in our blessed Saviour there are three heavenly functions and offices his Propheticall to teach us what evill is in our selves and what good we receive from God his Priestly to reconcile us to God in delivering us from the evill which we have deserved and from our sins and in communicating unto us righteousnesse and other graces from God his Kingly that our deliverance from evill and our possession of heaven and heavenly things may be confirmed unto us by his Kingly power for ever So these three offices were shadowed forth in Aarons glorious apparell his robe with the bels setteth forth Christs Propheticall office the golden plate wherein was written Holinesse to Iehovah his Priesthood and the miter which was put aloft as a crowne his kingly power Iun. in Analys And herein Aaron also was a lively type of Christ that as three duties were to bee performed by the high Priest to teach the people by puritie of doctrine with integritie of life signified by Vrim and Thummim and to take care of the Church continually which is meant by bearing the names of the tribes graven in precious stones in his breast and by his sacrifices and prayer to be Mediatour for them unto God So all these but shadowed forth in Aaron are truly performed by Christ who is our Prophet most holy and perfect to teach us his Fathers will as our King hee protecteth and keepeth us and taketh care for us and as our Priest hee did once
for all offer up himselfe in sacrifice for us and still continueth our Mediatour Borrh. 4. Now the inferiour Priests garments are fitly applied to set forth the qualities and conditions of the faithfull which are the members of Christ as the other did shadow forth Christ our head 1. Beda by the linen garment interpreteth decorem castitatis the comelinesse of chastitie by the girdle vigilantem mentis custodiam the diligent watchfulnesse of the minde to keepe the same by the bonnets visus anditus gustus custodiam the diligent keeping of the sight hearing taste and of all the senses 2. Thomas maketh a more generall use Castitas significatur per femoralia c. Chastitie is signified by the breeches Puritas vita per lineam tunicam Puritie of life by the linen garment Moderatio discretionis per cingulum Moderate discretion by the girdle Rectitudo intentionis pertiaram And a right intention by the bonnet 3. But this application is more fit The linen garment signifieth our innocencie and righteousnesse which we receive in the lavacre of regeneration being cloathed with Christs righteousnesse as the Apostle saith All yee that are baptized unto Christ have put on Christ the girdle signifieth constancie in the truth as S. Paul saith Stand therefore your loines girded about with veritie Tiara protectionis divinae signa erant The bonnets were signes of the divine protection the linen breeches shew what care should be had of comelinesse and what reverence is to be used in the service of God Pelarg. Marbach Who addeth this further that as we put more comelinesse upon our uncomely parts as the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 2.23 So our Saviour hath respect unto the vile and abject members of the Church such as are despised and counted base in the world 4. And like as we use three kinde of garments some for necessitie to cover our naked parts some for ornament and comelinesse and some for defence as militarie garments as here the Priests had their linen breeches of the first sort their linen coat of the second and their girdle of the third So unto a Christian are necessarie three kinde of spirituall garments the first is the garment of faith whereby our sins are covered secondly the ornaments of the soule are requisite whereby Christians must be adorned in the sanctitie and integritie of life thirdly they must put on their spirituall armour and take the sword of the Spirit the word of God whereby they may fight against Satan Simler Borrhaius 4. Places of Doctrine 1 Doct. None must intrude themselves into the callings of the Church Vers. 1. CAuse thou thy brother Aaron to come In that Aaron intruded not himselfe into the Priests office but was thereunto called Procopius giveth this note Qui temerario ansu ad se trahere sacerdotium c. He that will rashly draw unto himselfe the Priesthood shall suffer punishment So also Oleaster So the Apostle observeth upon this very example of Aaron No man taketh this honour to himselfe but he that is called of God as Aaron Heb. 5.4 2. Doct. The agreement which ought to be betweene the Civill and Ecclesiasticall state OLeaster noteth here further in that Moses who was the chiefe Magistrate called Aaron to the Priesthood the concord and amitie that ought to be betweene the Civill and Ecclesiasticall state is commended that as Ioash prospered while hee followed the direction of Iehoiadah so both the Ecclesiasticall state should imitate Iehoiadah to give holy counsell and direction unto the Magistrate and the Magistrate to be like Ioash in following the same 3. Doct. Profitable arts are the gift of God Vers. 3. SPeake unto all cunning men whom I have filled with the Spirit of wisdome c. Gallasius hereupon thus writeth Omnem artem industriam c. Dei donum agnosco Every art and industrie which bringeth utilitie unto man I acknowledge to be the gift of God as the Prophet Isaiah saith that God instructeth the husbandman to have discretion Isa. 28.26 Men therefore to whom God hath given the knowledge of profitable and commendable arts should have a care to employ them to Gods glorie and not to abuse them to wantonnesse 4. Doct. Whatsoever is instituted in Gods service must proceed from his wisdome Vers. 3. SPeake unto all cunning men in the Hebrew wise in heart Whatsoever is instituted in the service of God à sapientia Dei proficisci debet must proceed from the wisdome of God no humane device must have place or bee admitted there Simler Sauls policie in transgressing Gods Commandement in saving the best things of the Amalekites though hee thought hee did therein well and wisely yet was displeasing unto God 5. Doct. The sound of the Word in the Gospell exceedeth the sound of Aarons bels under the law Vers. 35. HIs sound shall be heard c. Herein as Lippoman well observeth appeareth the excellencie of the Gospell beyond the Law they heard then but the sound of Aarons bels Nunc audimus clarum sonitum Evangelii Now we heare the cleere sound of the Gospell c And as the understanding of a man exceedeth the capacitie of a childe and the cleere day the dawning so the cleere light of the Gospell excelleth the shadowes of the Law God providing better things for us as the Apostle saith that they without us should not be perfect Heb. 11.40 6. Doct. There ought to be order among the Ministers of the Church Vers. 40. THou shalt make for Aarons sons coats In that Aaron the high Priests coats were made more costly and glorious than his sons the inferiour Priests therein commendatur ordo inter Ecclesiae ministros is commended order among the Ministers of the Church that although Christ doe forbid bid his Disciples Luk. 22. to exercise dominion one over another as the Princes of the world doe Neutiquam tamen ordinem abrogat Yet he doth not abrogate order seeing he hath not onely distinguished them himselfe in gifts but in offices as the Apostle saith Ephes. 4. He hath given some to be Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists some Pastors and Doctors c. Marbach 5. Places of Controversie 1. Controv. Against the superstitious apparell of the Romish Priests Vers. 4. THou shalt make a breast-plate an Ephod and a robe and a broidered coat These Priestly garments being ceremoniall and typicall are now abolished Christ the true high Priest being come with his ornaments Therefore the Romanists doe plainly Iudaize in bringing againe into the Priestly order such varietie of garments as the Pall the Miter the Crozier staffe the Albe the Chimere the gray amice the Stoale with such like Their Priests come forth as though Aaron addressed himselfe with his attire to sacrifice at the Altar S. Paul hath given us a rule concerning these things which are but a shadow of things to come but the bodie is in Christ Coloss. 2.17 But it will bee here further asked if it bee not lawfull now for the
that we should never know in what order any thing was done 2. Beside the manner of speech used by way of transition vers 12. when the Lord began againe to speake of â—actifying the Sabbath afterward or then or further the Lord spake unto Moses c. sheweth that this speech followed immediately upon the other communing which the Lord had with Moses concerning the Tabernacle 3. The space of time even fortie daies while Moses communed with God sheweth that God had conference with Moses about more things than the morall and judiciall lawes rehearsed chap. 20 21 22 23. 4. And the second fortie daies was an unfit that for Moses to receive all these instructions in for then he fell downe 〈…〉 nights before the Lord Deut. 9. â—5 to intreat him for the people there was not then such opportunitie for Moses to receive those directionâ— all the time being 〈…〉 unto God Tostat. qu. â—3 QUEST XXII Why Moses stayed fortie daies with God in the 〈◊〉 WHen the Lord had made an end Which was after fortie daies 1. Because all this time needed not be spent in promulgation of the former lawes which might have been delivered in a shorter time the Hebrewes thinke that Moses further received then their Cabala which if they indeed did understand to be the mysticall doctrine of the Messiah they therein should not thinke amisse but the Jewish Cabala hunteth after letters and syllables and doth gather mysteries out of them which hath no warrant from Moses 2. During then this time beside the receiving of these lawes and instructions Moses no doubt was exercised in the meditation of them and made perfect in the sense and understanding thereof as likewise the mysterie of the blessed Messiah was now revealed unto him 3. And although the Lord by the illumination of his Spirit could in one day have inspired Moses with the knowledge of all these things yet it pleased God that Moses should continue in this exercise the space of fortie daies for these two ends 1. That he himselfe might hereby be more assured of his calling and by this continuall meditation be throughly prepared and made fit 2. And that the people by this miraculous worke of Moses abode with God fortie daies without meat and drinke might be induced to receive Moses message and ministerie with greater reverence Simler QUEST XXIII Why the Lord gave the written law HE gave him two Tables of the Testimonie 1. the Lord gave not the written law to the ancient Fathers but deferred it till Moses time because as the Apostle saith lex non est posita justiâ— the law is not given unto the righteous habebaâ—â— in semetipsis justitiam legis they had in themselves the law of righteousnesse but after that this law of righteousnes grew into oblivion extincta esset in Egyptâ— and was as extinguished in Egypt c. it was necessarie to be renued by the written law Irenaeus 2. Lex data est ut per â—am lux qua in nobis est accendatur c. The law was given that thereby the light which was in us should bee increased Cyril The light of nature being dimmed it was to be cleared and renued by the law 3. Ambros addeth further Lex quid operatur nisi ut omnis mundus subditâ—s fieret Deo c. What else doth the law worke but that all the world should bee subjected unto God c. for by the law commeth the knowledge of sinne 4. Hierom giveth another reason why the written law was given which was first written in all mens hearts because Iudei se solos accepisse legem gloriantur c. The Jewes only boast that they received the law hereby is signified that seeing the law commandeth nothing which was not before imprinted in the heart by the instinct of nature that they qui leges haâ— observavâ—riut c. which should observe these lawes should obtaine the reward c. whether they were Jewes or Gentiles as S. Peter saith In everie nation he that feareth God and worketh righteousnesse is accepted with him Act. 10.35 5. The law also was given to prepare men for the Messiah whose comming then more and more approached for two waies did the old law lead men unto Christ one way Testimonium de Christo perhibendo by giving testimonie of Christ as our blessed Saviour saith All things must be fulfilled which are written of me in the law the Psalmes and the Prophets Luk. 24.44 alio modo per modum dispositionis another way by way of disposing by drawing men from idolatrie and holding them to the worship of the true God and so preparing them for Christ Thomas QUEST XXIV Why the Lord gave the law to the Israelites and to no other people THis law was also given unto the Jewes rather than to any other nation 1. Not for that they only were found to continue in the true worship of God all other nations being given to idolatrie foâ— they also fell presently to idolatrie in worshipping of a golden calfe and the Lord telleth them that he did not set his love upon them for their righteousnesse 2. But the reason was because the Lord would performe his oath and promises to their fathers to make them his people Deut. 7.8 So it appeareth quod ex sola gratuita electione c. that onely by the free and gracious election of God the fathers received the promises and their children had the law given them 3. But if it againe bee asked why the Lord did chuse the fathers of whom Christ should be borne Augustine answereth Quare hunc trahat illum non trahat noli velle dijudicare si non vis errare c. Why the Lord draweth one and not another do not take upon thee to judge if thou wilt not erre 4. The law also was given unto the Israelites especially for these two reasons imponitur duris superbis c. it was imposed first upon them that were stubborne and proud De duobus enim naturalis homo superbit de scientia potentia c. A naturall man is proud of two things knowledge and abilitie or power Therefore because the Jewes might take themselves to bee wiser than other people as both having more knowledge and greater strength to do those things which were requisite God therefore gave them the morall law written both to shew their ignorance in the duties which God required as also their insufficiencie of strength imponebatur etiam lex bonis Likewise the law was given unto the good and well disposed that they thereby might be holpen to performe those duties which they desired To this purpose Thomas ibid. 5. Hierom seemeth to give another reason of giving the morall law unto the Israelites first the Lord gave them his morall law but after they had committed idolatrie than hee required sacrifices to bee offered unto him rather than to idols Auferens puram religionem mandatorum Dei concedens sanguinem victimarum
Hee brake them to be a punishment of the people unworthy of such a benefit Cajetan 4. Beside the equitie thereof appeareth that as they had broken the Covenant on their part so it was fit the monument of Gods Covenant should be broken Tostat. qu. 29. And Moses shewed by this that they by their apostasie tabulas legis rupisse had broken the tables of the Law first Marbach So Chrysostome saith Moses thought it an absurd thing si populo ebrio c. legem afferet if hee should have brought the Law to a drunken and besotted people Theodoret to the same purpose Quia dotalium libeliorum typum tabulae gerebant c. Because the tables were as the libels or bils of dowrie and the spouse before the marriage was solemnized had committed adulterie jure optimo dotalem libellum fregâ—sse existimandus est hee may bee thought by good right to have cancelled the bill of dowrie 5. Testari etiam voluit c. And Moses would hereby testifie unto them how they deserved to be cast off and forsaken Pelarg. And God hereby for the time Per manum Mosis repudiavit populum Did by the hand of Moses cast off his people Calvin 6. And this was done ad majorem terrorem populi for the greater terrour of the people who was more moved with signes than with words as when Samuel declared unto the people their sinne he prayed and there came thunder and lightning that the people by those terrible signes might be the more moved 1 Sam. 12. So Ieremie to shew after a more lively manner the destruction of Jerusalem brake the earthen bottle before their face signifying that the Lord would breake them as a potters vessell Ier. 19.11 Ferus Gallas QUEST LII What the breaking of the tables signified 7. ANd by the breaking of the tables the Lord would have other things signified 1. Fractio tabularum signum fuit evacuationis legalium in adventu Christi The breaking of the tables was a signe of the evacuating of the legall ceremonies in the comming of Christ Lyran. The first Law delivered in mount Sinai continued not Lex nova ei successit the new Law of the new Testament succeeded in place thereof Tostat. qu. 29. 2. It was a signe Regnum Iudaeorum ad Gentes transiturum That the kingdome of the Jewes should be translated to the Gentiles Ferus That the Arke Tables Temple Altar should be dissolved and taken from the Jewes Simler 3. The breaking also of the tables signified that it was impossible for the Law to be kept Donec Christus per Spiritum sanctum c. Untill Christ should renue the same in our hearts by his holy Spirit Marbach Osiander 4. Augustine further maketh this signification of it that as the tables which God made were broken and yet those which Moses prepared did continue So God created man with reason and understanding and freedome of will Sed eas homo confregit cùm Diabolo acquievit se illa gratia indignum reddidit But man brake those tables when he gave place to the Devill and made himselfe unworthy of that grace But now the second tables must be made that is enitatur elaborare ad virtutes man must endevour to labour for vertue c. Ex Gloss. ordinar Seeing man lost the graces of his creation which were given him without his labour he must by his endevour and labour Gods Spirit so working in him seeke for the renovation of grace by faith in Christ. QUEST LIII In what part the tables were broken and what became of the fragments COncerning other circumstances observed in this action of the breaking of the tables 1. That is a ridiculous and unsavourie fable of the Hebrewes that Moses tooke the fragments of those broken tables which they say were made of a precious stone and sold them and became verie rich thereby for this were to lay a grievous imputation of covetousnesse upon Moses which he was not in the least manner touched with 2. Some thinke that Moses tooke those fragments and put them in a chest which was used to be carried before the host Numb 10.35 But the Arke there spoken of was the Arke of the Covenant ibid. vers 33. 3. That also is a light conjecture that the tables were broken about the place where the fourth Commandement concerning the Sabbath was written because that precept onely of the ten was ceremoniall and not to continue for both the tables were broken and not onely the first wherein that Commandement was written QUEST LIV. Why the tables were broken at the bottome of the mount Vers. 19. HE brake them in peeces beneath the mountaine Why the tables were broken in this place at the foot of the mountaine these reasons may be given 1. Because Moses was now come to the bottome of the mountaine before he saw the golden Calfe through the indignation of the fight whereof being moved in zeale he forthwith brake the tables 2. Also the people when they came forth to meet the Lord and to heare his voice were suffered to come so farre to the foot and bottome of the hill chap. 19.17 in the same place therefore where the Law was given unto the people it was convenient that the tables of that Law should bee broken which they had first transgressed and broken themselves Tostat. qu. 30. 3. Beside it may have this mysticall signification that as the Law was given in the mount and broken at the bottome of the mount so if we will know the Law oportet nos altius ascendere we must ascend higher into the mount and mortifie the old man Simlerus QUEST LV. Whether the Calfe were burned to powder in the fire Vers. 20. HE tooke the calfe and burned it in the fire and ground it to powder c. 1. This golden Calfe was more than melted in the fire Deformavit liquefaciens igne He deformed the fashion thereof melting it in the fire As Iunius for if it had beene only melted it would have run into a lump and so have been the more unfit to fall to powder 2. Tostatus thinketh that Moses might apply certaine herbs unto the gold which if they be used in the melting of gold in cineres redigetur it will fall to ashes quest 30. But such conjectures having no ground out of the text are better rejected than received whence should Moses have such herbs here in the barren desart and to what purpose should they bee used seeing the gold not by burning but by stamping and beating was brought to powder 3. Some thinke that by the verie burning it selfe the gold was made powder as Sa. upon this place saith that he saw at Millaine gold in a founders shop burned in the fire to powder So also thinketh Osiander But it is evidently gathered out of the text that beside the burning the gold was beaten to powder yea it was stamped and ground small as dust Deut. 9.22 4. Wherefore it was first cast into the fire not
if it be fervent Iam. 5.16 4. Observ. Spirituall things first to be begged in our prayers Vers. 18. SHew me thy glorie Ferus here giveth this note Moses ut plurimum spiritualia petit Moses doth for the most part aske spirituall things Which teacheth us that in all our requests wee should principally beg those things at the hands of God which concerne our soules as our blessed Saviour saith First seeke the Kingdome of God and his righteousnesse and all these things shall bee ministred unto you 5. Observ. Against the feare of death Vers. 20. NO man shall see me and live Then after death and this life ended wee shall see God Borrhaius hereupon well noteth Quam preciosa res sit mors animalis hominis c. What a precious thing the death of the bodie is which bringeth us to see God as S. Paul saith I desire to be dissolved and to be with Christ Philip. 1.23 Death then of a faithfull man is not to be feared CHAP. XXXIV 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter is set forth the reconciliation it selfe of the Lord with his people consisting of three parts 1. The signes of this reconciliation going before to vers 8. 2. The substance of the reconciliation it selfe to vers 29. 3. The signes which followed after Moses was come downe 1. There are two signes of this reconciliation The first is externall and visible the preparing of the two tables of stone 1. Commanded to be made by the Lord vers 1. 2. With the manner of Moses comming up and the reverent behaviour of the people in the meane time vers 3. 3. And Moses obedience vers 4. The second is spirituall in the proclayming of the Lords name either shewing his substance Iehovah or his properties mercie toward the righteous or vengeance toward the wicked to vers 7. with the effect Moses humbling of himselfe vers 8. 2. The reconciliation consisteth of Moses humble suite to the Lord vers 9. and the Lords gracious answer wherein the Lord sheweth what he will doe for his people v. 10 11. then what he requireth of them where are propounded first morall lawes concerning the avoiding of idolatrie which are 〈◊〉 in number to vers 17. then ceremoniall which are three 1. Of their anniversarie and weekly feasts namely the Sabbath vers 18 21 22 23. 2. Of their first fruits of their cattell vers 19 20. and of their increase vers 29. 3. Of the manner of their sacrifices not to be offered with leaven vers 26. 3. The signes following are two first the bringing of the second tables with their writing by the Lord and Moses preparation thereunto by his fortie dayes fast vers 28 29. The second is the shining of Moses face where is described 1. The manner thereof vers 29. 2. The effects the astonishment of the people vers 30. 3. The remedie which Moses used which was double the inviting and calling of the people to come unto him vers 31 32. and the covering of his face vers 33. when he put it off when he went in to speake with God vers 34. and when hee put it on when he came out unto the people vers 35. 2. The divers readings Vers. 6. Iehovah Iehovah strong I. Iehovah Iehovah God B.G. cum caeter It seemeth rather to be an appellative than a proper name of the Lord here because of the distinction Rebia over Iehovah which separateth it from the sentence following Vers. 7. Not making the wicked innocent B.G.V.I.S. better than leaving one innocent B. or with whom none is by himselfe innocent L. See the reason hereof quest 11. Vers. 10. Behold I will make a covenant before all the people I will doe mervailes I. better than I will make a covenant before all the people and I will worke B.G. cum cater for there is a distinction at covenant and it is in the Hebrew I will worke not and I will worke Vers. 30. His face shined B.G.A.P. or streamed V. was glorious S. the brightnesse thereof was multiplied C. not cornuta erat was hornie L. See afterward the question upon this verse Vers. 33. When Moses had made an end of comming c. hee put a covering I. or So Moses made an end c. and had put a covering c. G. better than when he had made an end c. he put a covering V.L.S.C. it is better translated in the preterpluperfectense for then Moses had most need in respect of the peoples infirmitie to put a vaile upon his face when he spake unto them See the 51. qu. following 3. The questions discussed QUEST I. Wherefore the second tables were given Vers. 1. HEw thee two tables of stone 1. The Lord commandeth two tables of stone to bee prepared that it might bee a signe of his perfect reconciliation with the people in these respects 1. Because by this appeared that the Lord purposed not to destroy them for then he would not have given them a law and this was a signe that God would goe before them and be their guide still because he was their spirituall guide in giving them direction by his law Tostat. qu. 1. 2. And seeing the Arke was appointed to receive and keepe the tables of stone it shewed that the Lord purposed that whatsoever he had before prescribed concerning the making of the Tabernacle should stand Cajetan 3. And that he willeth the like tables in all respects to be made he thereby signifieth that he would have all things to returne to their former state Simler 2. But though God returned in grace unto them yet in that he prepareth not these tables as he did the first but willeth Moses to provide them he would have aliquod pâ—â—na vestigium rostare therein some marks of their punishment to remaine Ac si sanato vulnere manerâ—t â—â—catrix as though the scar remained after the healing of the wound Calvin 3. But the people are not sprinkled againe with bloud as they were at the first as neither now they which fall after Baptisme are baptised againe but it sufficed onely those things to be restored by repentance which were decayed by their transgression Ferus QUEST II. Why the Lord saith to Moses Hew thee HEw thee 1. R. Salomon doth gather hereupon because Moses is bid to hew unto himselfe c. that the Lord shewed a quarrie of Saphir stone whereout Moses hewed the tables and so he is willed to hew unto himselfe two tables of stone that is to his commoditie for Moses he saith became very rich by the fragments that were left in hewing of the tables But seeing no such thing is mentioned in Scripture nor yet by Iosephus who was more ancient than R. Salomon it is rather to be thought to be one of his fables Lyran. and beside they lay an unjust and untrue imputation upon Moses as though he intended and respected his owne profit whereas all his courses shew the contrarie that hee sought still the good
Hereby also Christ and his Church was prefigured that in him there should be but one shepheard and one sheepfold he should be the only Priest and Mediatour and he should prescribe one Faith one Baptisme Simler See more hereof quest 36. chap. 23. QUEST XLIV Who were bound to goe up to the feasts NOw whereas the males only were to appeare before the Lord 1. The women are excepted because they were unfit both in respect of their domesticall businesse which was to be cared for in the absence of their husbands as also for that they might be often letted by giving sucke or being with child and they were not in regard of the tendernesse of their sex to take so long a journey And yet devout women specially when they dwelt not farre off from the place of the Sanctuary did use to goe up as Anna the mother of Samuel and the Virgin Marie Tostat. quaest 22. 2. As for their servants the men were bound to goe up as well as their masters there was one Law for both the maids also sometime went up with their masters but they were not bound as Deut. 12.18 and chap. 16.14 both they their sonne daughter servant maid were to rejoyce before the Lord in their solemne feasts 3. Neither were all the males bound to go up as the children which were not able to goe nor yet were of discretion to understand what they there heard or saw done Tostatus ibid. 4. Neither were the male children bound to goe up as soone as they began to be of discretion as Tostatus giveth instance of our blessed Saviour who at twelve yeeres old went up with his mother for both that example was extraordinary no childe at those yeeres was to be compared unto Christ and beside when such children went up with their parents it was voluntary not exacted by Law 5. Wherefore such males must be understood qui sub censum transibant which passed under the summe or account who were under twenty Calvin and exceeded not fifty as the Hebrewes thinke Simlerus QUEST XLV Whether all the males were bound every yeere to goe up thrice to the Sanctuarie Vers. 24. I Will cast out the nations before thee 1. Here the Lord prevenâ—â—th an objection the people being required thrice in a yeere to goe up to the Sanctuary might have doubted that their enemies might have taken advantage of their absence and so have invaded them the Lord therefore biddeth them to be secure for that matter for he would cast out their enemies before them and so worke that they should not desire their land and therefore they should not be afraid to goe up to appeare before the Lord Gallasius 2. Some thinke that this Law of appearing thrice in a yeere before the Lord did not binde but untill such time as their borders were enlarged quando secura universa regio futura erat when the whole land should be quiet Cajetane Which Calvin thinketh was not till God having subdued all his enemies Sanctuarium suum locavit in Sion had placed his Sanctuary in Sion c. But this is not like that the people kept not this Law till David and Salomons time for they were commanded to observe all the Lawes and ordinances when they were come into the land of rest Deut. 12.9 So that by inlarging of their coasts is not meant the making of them larger but the planting of them in the land of Canaan Tostat. qu. 22. 3. Some thinke that this never happened unto the Jewes according to the letter that all their enemies were subdued unto them and therefore in futura vitae complebitur it shall be fulfilled in the next life Gloss. interlin But if this had never beene performed how should the people have beene incouraged by this promise to goe up thrice in a yeere True it is that there were some Canaanites still dwelling among them yet were the nations of them destroyed though not every particular one of the nation 4. Some are of opinion that this promise was made with a condition if they did then endevour to keepe their bounds and set watchmen and garrisons in their borders that then the Lord would protect them that the rest of the males might safely goe up Ex Lippom. But when should those males which kept the garrisons have gone up they could not then observe this Law to goe up thrice in a yeere 5. Some thinke that every third yeere only they which dwelt farthest off came up to the Sanctuary and two yeeres they were free because mention is made of tithes to be laid up in the end of three yeeres Deut. 14.29 But that must be understood of another tenth part beside that which was to be paid yeerely vers 22. which they were yeerely to eat before the Lord vers 23. and therefore that cannot stand that every third yeere only they were bound to goe up 6. Tostatus his opinion is because it was both chargeable for them to goe thrice and come thrice that is six times in all in a yeere and they in that time lost their labour at home and beside in the space of six moneths betweene the sixth and seventh moneths wherein all these three principall feasts were observed these six journeyes fell out and within one moneth after their returne from the Passeover they were to come up againe to the feast of the Pentecost He thinketh therefore that they only which dwelt neere hand came up thrice in the yeere they which were further off only went up once in the feast of the Passeover and in the seventh yeere of remission twice in the said feast and at the feast of Tabernacles when they were to heare the Law read unto them Deut. 31.12 quast 21. Contra. 1. The words of the precept are generall Three times in a yeere shall all the males appeare before the Lord Deut. 16.16 there are none excepted 2. Yea speciall order is taken for them which dwelt farre off that they might turne their offering into money Deut. 14.25 and every yeere they were to give the tithe of their increase and eat it before the Lord. 7. Wherefore the truer opinion is that all the males which were appointed to come up ascended thrice every yeere whereupon it is evident non tam longam vel latam fuisse promissionis terram c. that the land of Promise was not so long and large that in the space of foure moneths or at the most six they could come and go thrice to Jerusalem Lippom. For as Hierom writeth the land of Canaan was not above an hundred and sixty miles long and sixty miles broad allow then the furthest part of the land to be an hundred and twenty miles from the Sanctuary For wee must not imagine that it was placed in the utmost coasts it would aske them but a seven nights journey to the Tabernacle and as much homeward that is six weekes in the yeere somewhat above the tenth part which was no great matter for them to doe Oleaster
countenance 2 Cor. 3.7 So also reade the best Interpreters Vatab. Montan. Paguin Oleast Iunius QUEST XLVIII Why it pleased God to give such great glorie unto Moses countenance NOw it pleased God to print such a majesty and shining glory in Moses countenance for these reasons 1. God did bestow this gift upon Moses as a speciall signe of his favour and love toward him 2. By this the people might be assured that the Lord had heard Moses prayers and that he would renue his league with them and take them into his protection 3. And by this meanes Moses should be had in greater reverence and reputation with the people Tostat. quaest 25. Simler 4. This was done also ut lex illa valde honorata crederetur c. that the Law it selfe should be held to be glorious and honourable the Minister whereof was so glorious Tostat. 5. Thereby was signified also the inward illumination which Moses had whereby he was able to shine unto them in purenesse of doctrine 6. It also shewed what the righteousnesse of the Law is onely a shining of the face that is of the externall works before men it cannot afford the inward and spirituall justice in the sight of God Simler 7. Rupertus by these second tables which Moses brought downe with such great glory understandeth the glory of the Gospell But because the Apostle setteth the glory of the Gospell against the glory of the Law and sheweth that in respect of the exceeding great glory of the Gospell the Law was not glorious at all 2 Cor. 3.10 I rather preferre Origens elegant collection Nihil in lege gloriosum habet Moses praeter solam faciem That Moses had nothing glorious in the Law beside his face his hands were leprous by putting them into his bosome his feet also had no glory he being bid to put off his shooes and so by that ceremony he was to deliver over the spouse unto another But in the Gospell he appeared in the mount with Christ totus glorificatus all glorified c. Thus Origene elegantly sheweth the preeminence of the Gospell before the Law 8. Ambrose sometime thus applieth it Vultus patris filius The countenance of the father is the sonne and so maketh Moses a type of Christ who is the glory of the Father But that application is more proper Vultus Moses fulgor est legis fulgor autem legis non in litera sed in intellectu spirituali The countenance of Moses is the brightnesse of the Law the brightnesse of the Law is not in the letter but in the spirituall understanding which was hid from the Jewes QUEST XLIX Why Moses face shined more now at Moses second being in the mount than before 1. SOme give this reason why Moses face did shine now at his second being with God rather than at the first time because then Moses had not tam claram cognitionem such cleere understanding and knowledge of God as now which is signified by the shining of his face Lyran. 2. Rab. Salomon saith that by the laying of Gods hand upon Moses face it became bright and shining but Moses sight was hindred by that meanes from seeing Gods great glory and it was not the hand of that glorious body which appeared to Moses but some mist or cloud that was cast before Moses as is shewed before chap. 33. quest 51. 5. Gallasius saith it was illustre testimonium familiaris illius communicationis c. a most cleere testimonie of that familiar communication which Moses had with God But Moses had familiar conference with the Lord before for he spake unto him face to face chap. 33.11 4. Lippoman Ex longa collocutione conversatione cum Deo assecutus est c. Moses obtained this by his long conference and conversing with God But Moses had stayed as long before with God forty dayes and forty nights 5. Therefore the reasons rather are these 1. This glory was given him ad honorem legis for the honour of the Law but the first tables were broken and therefore it was not to be given then but now for the honour of these tables which should remaine 2. Moses had desired that the Lord would give them preeminence before all other people which notably appeareth in this dignity conferred upon Moses their Governour which never any had before 3. But the speciall efficient cause of this glory was ex visu Domini by the sight of the Lord Moses had now a more cleere sight of Gods glory than before Tostat. qu. 25. as things which the beames of the Sunne beat directly upon seeme also to shine Simler Oriente die rubet terra iraceo colore perfusa When the day ariseth the earth seemeth to shine red as with saffron colour and precious stones give a bright hue to those things which are next them Ambrose So that glorious body which Moses saw lightened also his face And the holy Apostle alluding hereunto saith We all behold as in a mirror the glory of the Lord with open face and are changed into the same image 2 Cor. 3.18 So Moses face was changed into the image of that great glory which he saw in the mount QUEST L. Why the people were afraid to come neere Moses Vers. 30. THey were afraid to come neere him 1. The cause of this feare of the people was partly necessary in respect of their weaknesse and infirmity because they were not able to behold Moses face for the glory thereof as the Apostle noteth 2 Corinth 3.6 2. It was partly voluntary they would not come neere him for reverence sake taking that light and brightnesse for some divine thing Tostat. qu. 26. 3. Moses shining countenance was the rather a terrour to the people peccati nuper commissi sibi conscio being guilty in themselves of that sinne which they had lately committed Simlerus 4. The people also were hereby admonished ut quiddam altius lege requirerent that they should seeke for somewhat higher than the Law Gallas 5. And this further may be considered hanc illis dedecoris notam fuisse inustam c. that this was a marke of ignominie set upon them that by their sinne they had so farre separated themselves from the glorious presence of God that they were not able to indure the countenance of his servant Calvin 6. And herein appeareth a manifest difference betweene Moses and Christ the Law and the Gospell Contrarius splendor faciei Christi in qua amabilis gratia refulget The brightnesse of Christs face is contrary wherein amiable grace shineth Borrhaius QUEST LI. Whether Moses covered his face before he spake to the people or after Vers. 33. SO Moses had made an end of communing with them and had put a vaile upon his face 1. Calvin thinketh that first Moses talked with the people but he was constrained sermonem abrumpere populi discessu vel fuga to breake off his speech because of the peoples departure and fleeing from him and that
unlesse thou shew him a signe c. We must waite then upon God for his direction as the eyes of the servants looke unto the hand of their masters And as the campe of Israel removed at the lifting up of this cloud so by Gods direction I have begun and by his gracious blessing finished this long and laborious worke this fifth of Iune Anno 1608. To whom in all humblenesse of soule and with bended knees of my heart I doe onely ascribe the praise thereof and now as at the setling of this cloud the camâ—e stayed so heere I rest for this time untill by the ascending of the cloud that is the further motion and direction of Gods Spirit I shall be raised to march on still by those heavenly stations of the Scriptures toward the celestiall Canaan Amen 1 Timoth. 1.17 Now unto the King everlasting immortall invisible unto God only wise be honour and glorie for ever and ever Amen FINIS THE TABLE OF THE QVESTIONS HANDLED IN THIS COMMENTARIE Certaine Generall questions out of the whole booke explained 1. QUest Concerning the inscription of the booke 2. qu. Of the computation of yeares comprehended in the storie of Exodus 3. qu. Whether Moses were the writer of this booke 4. qu. Whether Moses Iudiciall lawes doe now necessarily binde the Civill Magistrate Questions upon the first Chapter 1. QUest Why the twelve Patriarkes are so often rehearsed 2. qu. VVhy Iacobs sonnes are not alwaies rehearsed in the same order 3. qu. How they are said to bee seventie soules that went downe with Iacob into Egypt 4. qu. Of the wonderfull multiplying of the Israelites in Egypt 5. qu. In what time the Israelites so exceedingly increased 6. qu. By what meanes the Israelites increased 7. qu. Who this new King was that knew not Ioseph 8. qu. VVhy this Pharaoh is called a new King 9. qu. The causes of the afflection of the Israelites 10. qu. Of the hard affliction of the Israelites 11. qu. Of the cities Pithom and Rameses which the Israelites built for Pharaoh 12. qu. How many yeares the affliction of the Israelites is supposed to have continued 13. qu. The reasons why the Lord suffered his people to be afflicted in Egypt 14. qu. Whether the Midwives were Egyptians or Hebrew women 15. qu. Why Pharaoh only giveth his cruel charge to two Midwives 16. qu. Whether the Midwives made a lie and are therein to be justified 17. qu. How the Lord is said to make them houses 18. qu. Whether the Midwives onely were temporally rewarded Questions upon the second Chapter 1. QUest Of Amram Moses father 2. qu. Why it is said he went and tooke 3. qu. Of Iacobed Moses mother whether she were aunt or cosine german to Amram 4. qu. Why such marriages were tolerated in those daies 5. qu. When Amram married his wife 6. qu. Of the time of Moses birth compared with the times before and the times after 7. qu. Of the antiquitie of Moses who is found to be the most ancient of all writers either sacred or prophane 8. qu. VVhether the name of Moses were knowne unto the Gentiles before Christ. 9. qu. How Moses is said to bee a proper child and by Whom he was hid 10. qu. The Arke wherein Moses was put whereof it was made and where placed 11. qu. Whether Moses parents did well in exposing him 12. qu. Of the education of Moses and his adâ—ption to be Pharaohs daughters sonne 13. qu. Whence Moses had his learning of the Egyptians only or of the Grecians also 14. qu. VVhat kind of learning Moses received of the Egyptians 15. qu. VVhence the Egyptians received their learning 16. qu. VVhy it pleased God that Moses should be instructed in the Egyptian learning 17. qu. VVhy Moses had this name given him 18. qu. Of Moses visiting his brethren 19. qu. Whether it were lawfull for Moses to kill the Egyptian 20. qu. Why Moses though warranted from God yet useth great secresie and circumspection in this busines 21. qu. How Moses is said heere to feare seeing the Apostle denieth that he feared the King 22. qu. Why Moses sufferings are called by the Apostle the rebukes of Christ. 23. qu. Why Pharaoh sought to slay Moses 24. qu. The causes why Moses lived in exile and banishment fortie yeares 25. qu. Of Midian what countrie it was and where situat 26. qu. Rahuel Iethro Hobab whether they were the same 27. qu. Whether Rahuel were Prince or Priest of Midian 28. qu. VVhether Rahuel were an idolatrous Priest or a Priest of the true God 29. qu. Why Zipporah is called an Aethiopesse 30. qu. In what time Moses sonnes were borne unto him 31. qu. To whom the right of imposing names upon the children belongeth 32. qu. Whence the name of Gershom is derived 33. qu. VVhat Pharaoh it was that died while Moses was in Midian 34. qu. Whether the crie of the Israelites proceeded from true repentance Questions upon the third Chapter 1. QUest How long Moses kept his father in lawes sheepe what he did in the mountaine and to what â—nd he was so exercised 2. qu. Of the mount Choreb whether it was the same with mount Zion also why Moses went thither and why it is called the mountaine of God 3. qu. Of the vision of the bush 4. qu. Of the flame of fire that burned in the bush 5. qu. What is meant by the burning of the fire without consuming the bush 6. qu. Whether it were an Angell or God himselfe that appeared unto Moses and whether he that appeared were Michael the Prince of the people of God 7. qu. What made Moses to draw neere to behold this strange sight 8. qu. Why the Lord doubleth Moses name in calling him 9. qu. VVhat the putting off the shooes meaneth 10. qu. Why the Lord calleth himselfe the God of Abraham Isaak and Iacob 11. qu. Why Moses hid his face 12. qu. How this text is alleaged by our Saviour in the Gospell to prove the resurrection of the dead 13. qu. Why our Saviour in the Gospell specially urgeth this place against the Sadduces 14. qu. How God is said heere to descend 15. qu. In what respect the land of Canaan is called a large countrie 16. qu. Of the great fruitfulnes of the land of Canaan and of the wonderfull fruit of Palestina called the apples of Paradise 17. qu. Whether the fruitfulnes of the land of Canaan do yet continuâ— 18. qu. VVhether the Canaanites were a peculiar people by themselves 19. qu. How many nations of the Canaanites and why they were cast out 20. qu. VVhat made Moses so unwilling to take his calling upon him 21. qu. What signe it is which the Lord promised to Moses 22. qu. Why Moses enquireth after Gods name 23. qu. Of the best reading of these words I am that I am 24. qu. What the name is which the Lord heere giveth himselfe 25. qu. Of the meaning of the name Eheie and whether Plato and other Philosophers received any
yeare this was the third moneth 2. qu. What day of the moneth the same day was 3. qu. VVhether this first day of the third moneth were the 47. day from the Passeover 4. qu. Of the place where they incamped 5. qu. VVhether the Israelites incamped on the East side of the mount Sinai 6. qu. How Moses is said to goe up unto God 7. qu. VVhy both these names of Jacob and Israel are joyned together 8. qu. How the Lord is said to carrie them upon Eagles wings 9. qu. How they are said to bee the Lords chiefe treasure 10. qu. How they are said to be a Kingdome of Priests 11. qu. By what reasons the Lord perswaded the people and why 12. qu. VVhether the people unfeinedly here promise obedience 13. qu. How the Lord is said to come in the thicke cloud when and in what thicke cloud it was 14. qu. VVhy the Lord talketh with Moses in the hearing of the people 15. qu. VVhy Moses is said twice to have reported the peoples words unto God 16. qu. Why they are bidden to wash their garments 17. qu. Whether this were the third day of the moneth when the law was given 18. qu. VVhether the fifteenth day of the moneth were one of the fiftie which went before the giving of the law 19. qu. VVhether our Saviour with his disciples and the Iewes kept the Passeover together 20. qu. How the Apostles Pentecost and the Iewes Pentecost fell out all upon one day 21. qu. How the Lord is said here to descend 22. qu. VVhether Jehovah Christ Iesus appeared not in the old Testament but onely or usually the Angels 23. qu. VVhether it were Jehovah the Lord Christ or an Angell that came downe upon mount Sinai 24. qu. VVhy the people are forbidden to come up into the mountaine 25. qu. VVhy hee shall bee killed that toucheth the mountaine 26. qu. VVhy no hand was to touch him that came neere the mountaine 27. qu. VVhy the beast that toucheth the mountaine is commanded to be slaine 28. qu. VVhether at any time it were lawfull for the people to goe up to the mountaine 29. qu. VVhy Moses is not set downe to have reported all to the people which was given him in charge 30. qu. VVith what water they washed their cloaths 31. qu. VVhy they are commanded not to come at their wives 32. qu. VVhy Moses maketh such an ample and full declaration and description of the Lords glorious appearing in mount Sinai 33. qu. VVhy it pleased the Lord in this trouble and fearefull manner to appeare with thunder and lightning 34. qu. VVhether this thunder and lightning were naturall 35. qu. VVhy the Lord appeared in a thicke cloud 36. qu. Of the blowing of the trumpet at the giving of the law what it signifieth 37. qu. Of the different manner of the delivering the law and the Gospell 38. qu. VVhat it was that Moses spake and the Lord answered 39. qu. VVhether God himselfe or an Angell spake to Moses in the mount 40. qu. VVhy Moses is commanded to charge the people againe 41. qu. VVhat Priests are here understood 42. qu. Why Moses replieth as unwilling to go downe 43. qu. VVhy the Lord not withstanding Moses answer still chargeth him to goe downe 44. qu. VVhy Aaron is bid to come up with Moses wherefore he went up and when Questions upon the twentieth Chapter 1. QUest Whether this be a Commandement I am the Lord. 2. qu. Of the distinction and difference of the lawes of Moses in generall 3. qu. Of the validitie of the lawes Morall Ceremoniall and Iudiciall which are abrogated which are not 4. qu. Of the difference betweene the Morall and Evangelicall law 5. qu. Of the manifold use of the law in the fourefold state of man 6. qu. Why it pleased God now and not before to give his written law to the world 7. qu. How the Lord spake all these words and why 8. qu. Why it pleased God himselfe to speake to his people in the giving of the Law 9. qu. Of the division of the Morall Law 10. qu. Whether foure Commandements or three onely belong to the first table 11. qu. Whether all morall precepts as of loving of God and our neighbour bee reduced to the Decalogue 12. qu. Of generall rules to be observed in expounding the Commandements 13. qu. Why the Commandements are propounded negatively 14. qu. Of the speciall manner of accenting and writing observed in the Decalogue more than in any part of the Scripture beside 15. qu. Why this preamble is set before I am Jehovah thy God 16. qu. Why their deliverance out of Egypt is here mentioned Questions upon the first Commandement 1. QUest Whether it is better read strange gods or other gods 2. qu. Why they are called strange gods 3. qu. Whether any kinde of externall idolatrie be forbidden in the first Commandement 4. qu. Of the meaning of these words Before me 5. qu. What reasons ought chiefely to move us to acknowledge the Lord onely to be our God Questions upon the second Commandement 1. QUest What a graven image is 2. qu. What things a similitude must not bee made of to worship 3. qu. Of the difference betweene bowing downe and serving 4. qu. In what sense the Lord is called a jealous God 5. qu. Of the titles which the Lord here giveth himselfe and wherefore 6. qu. Of the general commination promise annexed 7. qu. How it standeth with Gods Iustice to punish the children for the fathers sins 8. qu. Why mention is made of the third and fourth generation 9. qu. Why mercie is promised to be shewed to a thousand generations 10. qu. How men are said to hate God Questions upon the third Commandement 1. QUest What is signified by the name of God and how diversly it is taken 2. qu. That it is more to abuse the name of Iesus than simplie of God 3. qu. How many wayes the name of God is taken in vaine 4. qu. What is required in taking of a right oath 5. qu. Whether men be bound to sweare often 6. qu. Whether it be lawfull to use cursing 7. qu. For what things an oath is not to be taken 8. qu. Whether all kinde oaths are to be kept 9. qu. Of the commination added to the third Commandement Questions upon the fourth Commandement 1. QUest Of the order of the fourth Commandement why it is put after the other 2. qu. Why it is said onely in this Commandement Remember c. 3. qu. VVhy the Lord thought good to appoint a day of rest and that upon the seventh day 4. qu. VVhether the precept of keeping the Sabbath were altogether ceremoniall 5. qu. To observe one day of seven unto the Lord is morall 6. qu. VVhat things in the Sabbath were ceremoniall what morall 7. qu. VVhat it is to sanctifie the Sabbath day 8. qu. Of the labouring six dayes whether it bee a Commandement 9. qu. VVhat works are permitted to be done upon the Sabbath 10. qu. VVhy
mount Sinai at the delivery of the Law 2. Visions were of three sorts either such as by spirituall illumination were manifested unto the intellectuall part and understanding or such as wrought upon the inward phantasie or were shewed by some visible signes to the externall sense Simler as in this place 3. This bush is in Hebrew called seneh which the Hebrewes describe to be a shrub full of prickes and without fruit and so thicke that a bird cannot enter without the rufling and pulling off her feathers some thinke that the mountaine Sinai was called of Seneh either because of this bush or for that it was full of bushes Perer. 4. There are two parts of this vision the flame burning in the bush and the Angell speaking â—o Moses out of the bush Simler QUEST IV. Of the flame of fire that burned not IN a flame of fire out of the midst Plato maketh three kindes of fire the thicke grosse fire as in the burning of wood a bright and subtile fire yet burning and a cleere pure fire which lighteth onely and burneth not such as is in the starres And hereunto may bee added a fourth kind which is the element of fire which neither giveth light nor yet burneth This fire was of the second kinde not a fire in shew and imagination but a true fire for otherwise it had beene no marvell that the bush burned not Perer. 2. This fire was neither fetched downe from the element of fire as some thinke for so it should have pierced the middle and cold region of the aire which is contrarie unto it neither was it procured by an Angell who have not power of themselves to change the ordinance and course of nature but it was brought forth by God made of the aire or some other matter prepared of God for this was a supernaturall fire in those three things because it continued without fuell to feed upon it kept below and ascended not it burned but consumed not therefore it sheweth a supernaturall worke 4. Now that this fire consumed not the bush being a combustable matter the cause is because the naturall force thereof was restrained by God for if God concurre not with the nature of things they cannot worke nor shew their kinde as the three children walked in the firy oven and were not burned Whereas then the fire hath two inseparable qualities to give light and to burne God yet could here divide and separate them this fiâ—e giveth light but burneth not as the infernall fire shall burne but give no light as Basil sheweth upon the 28. Psalme Perer. QUEST V. What is signified by the burning of the fire without consuming the bush COncerning the signification hereof the burning of the fire and not the consuming of the bush 1. The Hebrewes thinke that God made choice of these two the fire and the bush whereof the one is a base thing and the other hath no shape that they should make no image or representation of God 2 Some thinke it betokeneth the Law that could not purge our sinnes signified by the bramble bâ—t only shew and demonstrate them 3. Some understand the divine nature of Christ which did not consume or dissolve his humane nature 4. Some apply it to the Virgin Mary of whom Christ was borne that carried fire and she not consumed 5. Some understand it of the state of a regenerate man in whom there are two parts the illumination of the spirit as the fire and the corruption of the flesh as the bramble 6. But Philo best expresseth what this fire resembled in the bush the bush sheweth the vile and miserable estate of the Israelites in Egypt the fire their affliction the not consuming of the bush that they should be preserved in their trouble and be delivered from it and that in the end they should bee as brambles to pricke and wound their enemies Perer. 7. Beside God sheweth himselfe by this supernaturall fire farre unlike the naturall and ordinarie fire which consumeth things neere hand but toucheth not a farre off But God is friendly and favourable to his servants that draw neere unto him but he exerciseth his judgâ—ments upon the wicked that goe farre off from him Ferus QUEST VI. Whether it were an Angell or God himself that appeared unto Moses QUEST VII What moved Moses to draw neere to behold this strange sight Vers. 3. THerefore Moses said I will turne aside 1. Some thinke that Moses being much conversant and exercised in the knowledge of naturall things might of a curious minde approch to trie out some naturall concluâ—ion because there are some kindes of fire that breake out of the earth as in Lyciâ— and Island that doe consume water and yet burne not tow and when Sylla besieged Athens there was a certaine tower which being 〈◊〉 with a certaine â—lime could not bee set on fire 2. But it is more like that Moses tooke this to be some divine sight as being exercised more in the contemplation of divine and spirituall things and was moved to draw neere by some spirituall instinct Ferus yet he might presume somewhat farre and therefore is forbidden to come neere Simlerus QUEST VIII Why the Lord doubleth Moses name in calling him Vers. 4. MOses Moses 1. The Hebrewes thinke that this voyce whereby God spake to Moses was lâ—ke to Amrams voice Moses father which was well knowne unto him and they further adde that the Lord used to speake to his servants in such a voice as was familiar unto them as when the Lord spake to Samuel he went to Helâ— supposing it had beene his voice 1. Sam. 3. But the going to Helâ— sheweth not that it was like that old mans voice but that Samuel not yet acquainted with the Lords voice could not judge it to be any mans voice but his and therefore goeth unto him to be better instructed 2. But this calling of Moses by name is a signe of Gods favour unto Moses so God calleth Abraham Isaac and Iacob whom he loved by their names The wicked are seldome called by their names in Scripture like as among men when one is called by his name it sheweth kindnesse and love as Scipio did study to call the citizens by their names that they might thinke he had a care of them And Cyrus called his souldiers by their names Simler 3. And this sheweth that God taketh especiall notice and knowledge of such whom hee singleth out by name as our Saviour answereth Nathaniel who wondred that Christ knew him by his name whom hee had not seene before that before Philip called him when he was under the fig tree he saw him Ioh. 1.48 Ferus 4. Beside this doubling of Moses name serveth the better to prepare and stirre him up to give diligent attention to this heavenly vision and voyce Simler QUEST IX What the putting off the shooes meaneth Vers. 5. PVt thy shooes off thy feete 1. We reade of three kindes of putting off the shooes in Scripture the