1 31. Resurrection when al power in Heaven and Earth was given him being set abov al Principalities yet the full accomplishment is not til last day when Death Hel and Satan shal be made his footstool Al this cannot be verified of the interstitial Millenium for yer that inchoats many things must terminat which cannot be subjected nor his chief Enimies subdued sith Death shal stil hav dominion Satan only bound in the bottomless pit not cast into the burning lake and Hel not utterly trod under foot Ob. Jeremy saith They shal say no more the Arc of the Lords Jer. 3. 16 17. Covenant nor shal it com to mind or memory then they shal cal Jerusalem the Lords Throne and al Nations shal gather to it nor shal they walk after their hearts imaginations Ergo al past things shal be forgot and Israel return to Jerusalem which shal be a Throne of Glory and al Nations joyn to them al which can be fulfilled at no time sav in thos thousand yeers Sol. The old things to be forgot are lawish Ceremonies not Gospel Ordinances the Arc and Temple were by Christs first coming removed the walking of Juda and Israel together with the Nations conjoyned imports the caling of Jews and Gentiles to the tru Church Heavenly Jerusalem For so saith Isaiah It shal com to pass in the last dais that the Lords Isai 2. 2 3. hous shal be established in the Mountain top and al Nations shal flow to it for out of Sion shal go a Law and the Lords word from Jerusalem The last dais were the Apostles times who from Sion and Jerusalem blew the Gospel Trumpet to al people as Jeremy speaks I wil giv you Pastors according to my Jer. 3 15. heart Christ and his Apostles which shal feed you with knowledg and understanding The walking after Gods heart implies no freedom from sin but a state of grace wherin God givs new hearts and writes his Law therin their main ground that Jerusalem new built shal be a Throne of Glory being before Jer. 〈 ◊〉 〈◊〉 but his footstool is a groundless crotchet for Sion Jerusalem and the Arc are caled in the old Testament not only Gods footstool but his Throne and in the new Testament not only his Throne but footstool Thus like other Sects they sens the Scripture literaly or tropicaly as they list Ob. Daniel saith In the dais of thes Kings God shal set up a 〈◊〉 2. 44. kingdom never to be dâ—stroyed but shal stand for ever Ergo Christ shal hav an everlasting kingdom and Jerusalem enjoy endless joy on Earth Sol. What a pretious inference is this so Preachers quote Texts and people turn their Bibles but may go beyond Seas to seek their glosses Daniels everlasting kingdom is meerly spiritual and celical as the Angel said to Mary The Lord shal Luk 1. 32 33. giv him his Father Davids Throne and he shal reign over Jacob for ever This kingdom for the matter is everlasting being the Glory which the Saints shal enjoy for ever with Christ in Heaven but for the maner of administration he shal resign it to the Father when the work of Redemption is perfected but no Millenar Earthly kingdom as they dream Ob. Saint John saith He was clothed with a vesture dipt iâ— Rev. 19. 13 14 15. blood Ergo Christ shal slay his Enimies and embru his vestments in blood that none shal be left to trouble the Church during that Millenar reign Sol. So they say but the next words speak contrary for his Armies in Heaven not on Earth folowed on whit Horses clothed in fine whit linnen not bloody yea his war-weapon is a sharp sword out of his mouth not in his hand who shal rule the Nations with a rod of Iron and tread the winepress of Gods wrath In a word thes bloody battles are not ascribed to Christ literaly as appears by a parallel place Who is this that coms from Isai 63. 1. c. Edom with died garments from Bozra meaning Christ by reason of the slain Edomits when in property of speech he had no body or bloody raiment being seven hundred yeers before his byrth Ob. 'T is said the City had no need of Sun or Moon and the Rev 21. 23. 24. Kings of the Earth bring their glory to it Ergo Jerusalem ther meant shal shine in great temporal glory and terren Princes be subdued to it at Christs coming to reign a thousand yeers Sol. Indeed Heavenly Jerusalem is ther meant and al such places or passages are Allegorical to shew the Churches condition on Earth and Saints state in Heaven which is elswher expressed by Metaphors of gold pretious Stones Fountains Fruits c. but to interpret them literaly of any City on Earth is like the Athenien Dotard who deemed every ship that cam into the Harbour to be his own Ob. Zechary saith hee that is feeble among them at that day Zech. 12. 8 9. shal be as David and Davids hous as God I will seek to destroy al Nations that shal com against Jerusalem Ergo the Saints who are to reign with Christ shal excel in glory and he wil destroy al Jerusalems Enimies Sol. Excellent inferences Ergo Potlid The Prophet plainly speaks of gifts poured on al Saints of the new Testament by the spirit of supplication which makes the least of them like David yea greater then John Baptist as Christ declares but Mat. 11. v. 11. what is this to earthly Jerusalem or Chiliasts Mathematical Kingdom Surely ther is no soundnes in it nor semblance for it in al Gods book Other places are heaped up which like Bay leafs cast into fire make much crackling in Pulpits and Pamphlets but if al the former be shadows the rest wil vanish into vapor Ob. The word Day in Prophetic phrase or Hebrew Idiom signifies som space of time not simply twelv or twenty four hours as the day of tentation in the Wildernes is fourty yeers long the Day of Babylonish captivity seventy Giv us this Day our daily Bread purports our term of life and 't is somtimes used for Eternity this day shâ—lt thou be with me in Paradise Ergo the Day of Judgment is to be taken in the same sens Sol. The antecedent is granted and consequent shal not be denied for none can tel how long that Judgment shal last specialy sith time shal be no more as the Angel swore Yet Mr. Mede makes it a continued act with the reign of just one thousand yeers For as Rabbi Elias confines the Worlds continuance to 6000. yeers so he puts the Millenium of Messiahs glorious reign to be a periodical consummation of al things when shal be a Sabbath of Eternal rest Why then doo common Chiliasts assign one thousand to that reign either before at or after the Judgment day Let them render a reason of the one and the other wil soon be resolved why Day implies a larger space more or
pressed St. Austin Chrysostom with others against Erastus giving general Councils glorious titles when they served his turn or els slighted them and Cartwright cals such citing of Fathers a raking of ditches 11. They allege against Bishops preeminence over Ministers that both are caled by one name and therfore one Function when 't is answered That community of title takes not away â—â—stinction of Offices sith even Princes are stiled Deacons Apostles and Priests yet far disparat in power this wil not content Yet Erastus proved That the name Elder is ever appropriat to Ecclesiastics not to Laics Beza borowed that distinction for his defens how the name of Bishops and Elders are common but their Offices not al one nor is it a good consequent every Bishop is a Presbyter Ergo every Elder is so for al names of Ecclesiastic Officers Deacons Apostles Prophets Prelats Pastors Presbyters are sometime used generaly or promiscuously 12. They aspers our State for suffering Bishops to retain som parts of the Canon Law crying out 't is Popish and Develish yet if ought sit their humors they secretly stole it out of the Decretals as in their draught of Disciplin more then seven parts of eight are borowed from it Hence Viret finding how Princes by cashiring the Canon Law assumed Ecclesiastic power to themselfs condemns their rashnes or rigidnes who depraved the same Thus by this Jury of Criminations it appeers how palpably partial al mortal Men are in their own behalfs yea their factious folowers wil hardly beleev half and justify the other moity as proceding of piety Next shal be shewed how they wrest the Fathers to their own sens Ignatius wils That nothing be doon in the Church without 〈◊〉 the Bishops consent who as Prince of Priests hath power over al Can ought be plainer Yet Cartwright counterfets That by Priests he means ruling Elders Lay ones he never know by Prince the Moderator chosen to propone matters at one meeting only and by power over al his authority over the Elders in the same Parish when no such precincts were yet bounded just after their new cut Justin Martyr stiles every Bishop Prelat as preposited over Priests and People Cartwright consters it That he was Prelat of the People not over Presbyters or at most a Moderator to propos matters only Yet if he was superior over Ministers how fondly is it inferred to be lawful becaus he was so for even in thos dawning daâ—â— som things deviated from the Gospels purity as the name Prelat common to al Elders was appropriat to one Thus like Wind-millers they make every wind serv their turns Ireâ—â—â—â— saith the Apostles appointed Bishops in thos Churches which they planted Beza clean contrary to his mind and meaning interprets it of Pastors Doctors and ruling Elders not constituted by their authority but chosen by the Parishes For when any Officer was elected the Apostle present consecrated him to the Lord by laying on hands in the name of the Presbytery Jerom testifies That from St. Marc to his time a Bishop was placed in higher degree abov Presbyters as a Captain in an Army Cartwright seeks strange shifts to shadow it 1. That the Presbyters did it without Marcs order 2. That the words from Marcs time are exclusiv as if that superiority began after his time which is flatly fals for he cals Marc Bishop of Alexandria and his successors superior in degree oâ— dignity 3. That in saying it was so at Alexandria he implies it was not so elswher Is not his a goodly gloss 4. He cries ouâ— against the pravity of thos primitiv times which is a more ingenuous agnition but a silly shelter or Sanctuary for no wit of Man can evade or exclude it Jerom saith farther It was ordered by Decrce of the whol World That to suppreâ—â— Schisms one should be chosen by the Priests abov the rest Beza boldly givs him the ly which the testy old Man if he theâ— lived would retort in his throat that it was not so Many Antients Irenâ—us Cyprian Tertullian Jerom Ambros Austin cal Bishops the Apostles Successors And Ecclesiastic Writers draw long Catalogs of their names in several Sees which thos Father 's urged against upstart Heretics in their dais but when Papists press such succession at Rome and elswher we deny not the truth of it but answer that personal succession is very effectual if Doctrinal concur and thos Fathers in urging the first had a special ey to the last becaus such Heretics oppugned som points of Apostolic Doctrin Yet Cartwright and his Cru contend that by Bishops are meant Parochial Pastors stiled the Apostles Doctrinal successors and al Episcopal Catalogs are of Parish Priests Yea Sadeil excluding al personal succession grants Doctrinal to Laics if they hold the Apostles precepts and walk in their paths O dainty When swarms of Authors are cited that Timothy was Diocesan of Ephesus Cartwright givs the ly to al becaus St. Paul saith he was Evangelist So was S. Marc yet a Bishop When for Antiquity of Archbishops Clemens Anacletus Anicetus Epiphanius Ambros c. are urged together with St. Austins rule That wher a name is so old and origin not extant it should seem Apostolic Cartwright cals the citing of antient Authors a raking of Hel and saith thos times were not pure Virgin-like branding Clemens Anacletus and Anicetus as conterfet cranks haply som forgeries were vented in their names and slights Epiphanius that he wrote according to his time but rejects Ambroses Book de dignitate Sacerdotum as foisted When for the Office of Archdeacon Damasus Sixtus Sozomen and Socrates are quoted Cartwright answers That Damasus spake in the Dragons voice the best ground bears thistles and thos times were corrupt Thus they either wiredraw the Fathers words to their own fancy or deny their authority which are easy evasions When Ignatius terms a Bishop Prince of Priests and Cyril and Tertullian high-Priest Cartwright cursedly censures that such Proctors presum to put our Saviour out of his Office yet they are only stiled his Substituts on Earth when al confes it to be the joint judgment of the Catholic Church and Councils that Bishops are the best remedies to repel Schisms and Heresies Beza and Cartwright cry they are al deceived for ther were great controversies and contentions stil under their regiment 'T is tru for Christ foretold it wil be so stil til the end When a cloud of primitiv witnesses is produced for the lawful use of Holy dais Cartwright complains That Truth is measured by the crooked yard of time and appeals from authority to Scripture wherof he wil be sole Judg and Interpreter When the whol stream of Fathers and Councils is urged to prov the Churches power in al indifferent things not prescribed by Gods Word he carps how he is pestered with human authorities instead of the Prophets and Apostles shaking them off as St. Paul did the Viper with one blast that the things asserted are now questioned
defect then exuberance that way Howbeit thos rigid Rhadamants lov luscious luxurious feasting at al times els specialy on Ashwendsday good-Friday or other fasting dais more then any Christmas Men used heretofore Yea the Scots at first Reformation cashired al Popish customs and ceremonies except their beloved Grece-Cup which was to serv in at end of meals al liquorâ— then used wherof ech drank what he listed In sum Christmas harmless sports in sit seasons are lawful Summary good fires behooful holy Hymns useful New-yeers gifts fruitful begetting mutual amity among Neighbors and plentiful fare without surfet or ebriety cheerful whatever Sectists cavil in their Chairs or Pulpits to the contrary It folows not that every thing which Pagans or Papists doo is Heathenish or Popish for Gentils doo many excellent things by Natures principles which Gospel Principles confirm that are commendable in Christians so Papists retain sundry points of Doctrin Disciplin and maners which Protestants may imitat Ob. Such Fests are not warranted by Christs precept nor Apostles practise nor any authentic authority Ergo 'tis Wil-worship fitto be extirped or extermined Sol. The Lords day hath no warrant of precept or practise in Scripture yet lawful necessary and generaly tho not specialy Moral by the first words of the fourth Commandment but neither this nor Christmas wants authentic authority of the universal Church through al ages nor is one wil-worship more then the other For wil-worship as St. Paul Col. 2. 23. shews hath no Scripture warrant general or special but only the vain wil or phansy of Men as worshiping Angels and placing an absolut necessity of holines in things indifferent The general rule of St. Paul Let al be doon decently in order 1 Cor. 14. 40. is sufficient warrant without particular precept precedent or practise for Christs Spous to ordain occasional Fests in themselfs lawful and laudable tending to Gods glory and Peoples good as som are often appointed among us upon emergent occasions or occurrents So the Jews freely observed an annal Fest of dedicating the Altar instituted by Judas Machabeus 1 Maâ— 4 â—9 after the Temple had bin Idolatrously polluted by Antiochus Epiphanes which yet is not specified much less sanctified in the old Testament or Canon of Scripture but Christ honored it with his presence as he did their septidial John 10 22. mariage Feasts with his first transubstantiating miracle of turning Water into Wine in Cana. So the Catholic Church or any particular may constitut or celebrat set dais for pious purposes yeerly or extraordinary if they shal see good caus Ob. Tatling Tradition tels that Christ was born Dec. 25. then at Solstice immediatly after Midnight as the dais began to lengthen but the Church of England celebrated the Birth day ful twelv dais after the Hyemal Solstice Ergo hir Accompt was erroneous Sol. This is already answered to the first argument and the reason rendered of that deviation becaus we folow the Julian Calendar sans reformation but tho the Church of England doth not observ the tru precise time of the Winter Solstice yet she celebrats the tru day Dec. 25. according to the Julian Accompt stil which is sufficient nor is the time so exactly to be regarded as the thing or benefit to be remembred Ob. No Magistrats can make Dais holy nor impose them Gal. 4 9. to be necessarily or perpetualy observed For the Apostles cal such observances weak beggerly Elements the yoke of bondage Gal 5. 1. and rudiments of the Law which destroy Christian liberty Ergo Col. 2 20. they cannot institut Fests Sol. Indeed they cannâ—t make dais holy or impose them to be observed under pain of damnation which dâ—strois Christian liberty and is a proper privilege of Gods power nor are dais properly holy inherently no more then Churches or Elements of the Sacraments which yet are cald holy being appointed or appropriated to Religious uses so Magistrats may sanctify or set apart certain dais to holy services for Gods glory having free ful power to order things indifferent The Jews ordained occasional Fests which Christ and his Apostles observed with their presence so our Magistrats appoint dais of Humiliation and Thanksgiving which People are bound to keep holy much more Christmas day for many reasons 1. God promised it when he said to the Serpent John 8. 56. The Womans seed shal break thy head 2. Christ saith Abraham rejoiced to see this Day 3. Jacob foretold it that the Scepter Isai 7. 14. shal not depart from Juda til Shiloh com 4. Isaiah saith a Virgin shal conceiv and bear a Son cald Immanuel for unto us a Child is born to us a Son is given the Prince of Peace at whos byrth was public Peace through al the Roman world Saint Paul cals it the fulnes of time when Men and Angels Gal. 4. 4. Luk 2. 10 11 13. were filled with ineffable joy and admiration The Angel which told the Shepherds of his byrth had a multitud of heavenly Host praising God saying Glory to God in the highest and on Earth Peace good will towards Men. Clement an Apostolic man bids Christians keep Fests diligently and in the first Const Apost l. 5. c. 1â— place Christs byrth day which al primitiv Fathers and others from age to age til our mad-brain days hav most devoutly celebrated yea on the very twenty fith of December whos exemple and exhortations in their sacred Sermons Homilies and Treatises the late reformed Churches of Helvetia Bohemia Bremen Auspurg Savoy Poland Hungary Scotland France Belgia Palatinat beside Denmarc Sweden and al Lutheran Churches in Germany or elswer folow both by practise and Precept Ob. The Lords Day sanctified weekly in memory of Christs Resurrection is sole-sufficient in stead of al els Ergo to ad any on work dais without warrant is superstitious wil-worship specialy sith t is commanded six dais thou shalt labor but keep holy the or a seventh day Sol. Thos harsh terms of superstitious wil-worship cast on Anaâ—â—me 〈◊〉 the Service Book Christian Fests are causless calumnies being their common brands or badges bestowed on our public Liturgy which they cal rank Atheism a proud Strumpet a cursed Mass of superstition ful of Serpents bathed in the blood of Bodies Souls and Estats the reliques of Popish dregs the very head not stâ—mp or lâ—â— of the Dragon the jugling or conjuring of Magicians and character of Antichrist who say our thirty nine Articles are stuffed with Popery and Arminianism but scorn the book of Homilies as most cours contemptible kitchin-stuf If to rail or revile be sufficient who cannot be eloquent and how easy is it to cast such base dirt in their deerest mothers face which may fitly be retorted they reviv the Petrusians Heresy who decried al Christian Fests to introduce Atheism which in milder language is stiled Libertinism The Lords day is most necessary and must be doon yet the rest not left undoon sith al tend to
one end nor is it so sole-sufficient to shuffle out the right religious celebration of al other Festivals for wher is it said we shal sanctify that only or why doo we ordain others upon occasions the Ascension was Christs last act of appeering on Earth yet may it not exclud the commemoration of his Resurrection no more then that can includ the celebration of al antecedent blessings or benefits imparted by his Passion Circumcision Nativity and Conception let God be glorified in al his wondrous works yea thos Annal Fests were instituted by the same authority that the weekly Lords Day tho this haply first by the Apostles meeting theron A. C. 324. to break bread which yet they did at other times but Constantin published the first Edict or Law for strict observing of it which Decree enjoyns also an Anniversary celebration of other Fests consecrat to our Saviours name as Eusebius and Sozomen relate thos words of the fourth Commandement six dais thou shalt labor are only permissiv thou shalt hav leav to labor six dais not preceptiv to injoyn it sith the sole intention is to sanctify the seventh Master Fisher who writes judiciously of this subject saith Of Gospel Festivals that the moral part of the fourth Commandement in the first words Remember to keep holy the Sabbath Day injoyns only a Sabbath no precise particular time to Gods public service but the Ceremonial commands the seventh day since abrogated on which God rested to be halowed yet the Lords Day is not appointed to be sanctified by the Letter of that Commandement nor is it moral no nor doth the Gospel giv any warrant to keep it weekly St. John specifies two times of Christs appeering to his Disciples John 20. 9. 19. after his Resurrection 1. At evening the same day he Luk 24 29. 33. 41. 42. rose when they assembled with the dores shut for fear of the Jews and had broild fish with an Hony comb for supper but they met not to celebrat his Resurrection as new Sabbatarians teach nor had they any Praying Preaching or other Divine duties ther mentioned For Mary Magdalens going to the Sepulcher with Spices and the two Disciples traveling John 20. 26. to Emaus cleerly convince it in their reput to be a or commonday 2. After eight dais or when eight dais were complet which haply was the ninth so it fals on the secund third of next but cannot be on the first day of the week unles they say as som doo that after eight dais must be interpreted before eight dais viz. on the seventh which is preposterous In al the Acts of Apostles is no appointment of holy Assemblies on the first day abov the rest St. Paul being to depart next morow cam together with the Dâ—sciples at Troas on the Acts 15. 28. 29. first of the week to break bread which al grant was Sunday night and continued together til Day-break must we therfore keep the Lords day from Sunday night til Monday morning or rather from Saturday night to Sunday night as they say surely they then met daily to Pray Preach and break bread without distinction of one day before another and that assembly was in the night when the Lords day was past In al the sacred Epistles of Paul James Peter John Jude is not one syllable of the Lords day thos words ther remains therfore Heb 4. 9 11. 14. a rest to Gods People are not meant of a temporal weekly rest but a spiritual eternal in the Heavens wher Christ Jesus our high Priest is gon before us into which Men must striv to enter by Faith being begun in this life by ceasing from sin and dooing righteousnes but finished or perfectly continued in the life to com Indeed St. Johns speech That he Rev. 1. 10. was in the Spirit on the Lords day at Ile Patmos shews ther was a day then so caled but whether it were a Festival whether weekly or Annal And if weekly whether the first of Christs Resurrection or sixth of his Passion which the Greecs kept weekly til Constantins Edict and Patmos is a Grecian Iland is not expressed nor is the weekly celebration of it commended or commanded in sacred Scripture Yet it is very antient even in the Apostles dais grounded on the foresaid words and generaly received in al Churches so 't is a custom constitution or tradition of the Catholic Church but no Doctrin or Article of Faith prescribed in Gods Word as al Orthodox Authors agree The Church set it apart in stead of the seventh day on good grounds 1. The Morality of the fourth Commandement requires set dais or times for Gods public service so the Church according to the liberty wherwith Christ hath made her free consecrated the first day among other Annals to be weekly kept holy without any affiâ—mation of morality which is but the blind zele of som men 2. The equity of a seventh day under the Law moved the Church to assign a like proportion of the first day every week to be Religiously halowed howbeit shâ— hath sufficient Reasons to refuse the last day and chuse the first 1. that by not observing the Sabbath Christians might be and they are freed from the yoke of the Ceremonial Laws 2. that herby a difference or distinction might be put betwixt us and the Jews The like two motivs or inducements she hath to chuse the first 1. Becaus God began the Creation on that day 2. In memory of our Saviours Resurrection becaus therby he mightily declared himself to be the Lord in which regard t is caled the Lords Day yet t is so spoken by way of affirmation not appropriation as if he declared himself to be the Lord at Mat. 1. 23. no other time or no day els to be termed the Lords 1. For he mightily declared himself to be the Lord by being born of a pure Virgin as no meer man ever was and that is so wel to be caled the Lords day yea he self expresly cals it his day John 8. 56. Semblably in sustaining Gods wrath for the sins of the World he mightily declared himself to be the Lord and the Passion day may be so stiled Again by ascending into Heaven in his Apostles view he mightily declared himself to be the Lord and that is also the Lords day 2. Christ by his Resurrection occasioned the first day to be kept holy whence som Writers say he changed the Sabbath into that day not as if he were Author or Institutor and did actualy set it apart to be halowed but only was Causa sine qua non or occasion of it as 't is said here the Papists made Nov. 5. an holy day yet the Parlement inacted it 3. That Christs rising is a part of Mans redemption but not the whol work but his Incarnation Birth Passion Ascention hav their several shares so wel as the Resurrection Sith then to be conceived born crucified buried rise again ascend
as if their cavilling were sufficient When Cyril saith That Moses Law to punish Adultery with death is out of date he comptrols his Opinion as corrupt May it not more justly be said Nomine mutato narratur fabula de se The Tale change but the Name Of them is stil the same When Theodoret testifies That Chrysostom Patriarch of Constantinople had the charge of other Churches in Asia Thracia Pontus beside his own See and Sozomen saith he deposed thirteen Bishops for Simony Cartwright cogs an answer That he had no other care over them then al Godly Ministers ought to hav over al Churches in Christendom or if he took rule over them he was a proud Prelat like the Pope yet haply he deposed thos Bishops by consent of the Presbytery not by his own authority al which bewray gross ignorance contrary to known truth When the first Nicen Synod which placed Patriarchs over Primats is urged for the antiquity and authority of both Cartwright scofs at it as no famous Council taxing divers Decrees of error specialy in points of Disciplin yet al Churches receiv them as authentic and Arrians or other Heretics may so wel cavil at the Doctrins When Antioch Council caled fifteen yeers after Decreed That inferior Bishops shal not act without their Metropolitan sav what pertains to their own Dioceses He glosseth that a Metrapolitan was only set over a chief City and the name makes no more difference then to say a Minister of London and Newington but by Dioces is meant a Parish so he stil translats the Greec word becaus it bears a Parochial and Episcopal division though generaly used for the later wher a chief Minister had som Mercat-Town with vicine Villages appendent to his Church as at Hitchin and elswher Sic parvis componere magna solebat What fine foists and brazen bolts are thes to bolster a bad caus When Athanasius avers That Denys Patriarch of Alexandria to which Jurisdiction Egypt Thebais Mariota Lybia and other Provinces pertained had the Churches of Panâ—apolis committed to his care as Epiphanius saith the same of Peter another Patriarch to whom the Archbishop of Miletus was subject Cartwright consters it of a voluntary care not authoritiv which every Minister ought to take of Churches round about him When Theodoret Bishop of Cyprus saith Heself had Government of eight hundred Churches Cartwright checks him for a vain boaster upbraiding his writing against Cyril quid ad rhombum When the Councils of Nice Antioch Carthage and Sardis declare that only Bishops hav authority to excommunicat Cartwright from Calvin the chief Coryphee declares That in so doing they fomented ambition Thus they speak Magisterialy from their Chair what they list which their partial poor blind Proselits hold for Oracles When Mr. Fox provs Archbishops to be abov Bishops and them abov Ministers Cartwright givs a dor That he writing a Story was more diligent to deliver what is doon then how wel or il doon Yea he censures al learned Men under Edward 6. that they knew only in part and being sent out in the morning dawn yer the Gospel Sun was risen high might oversee much which som not so quick eyd can better discry for what they had in acutnes of sight others enjoy by cleernes of the Suns light He prescribes two learned observations 1. That in the Nicen Synod and others within two hundred yeers after many Canons and Cautions were made touching a Metropolitan in every Province what honor or title he shal hav what limits of Jurisdiction and what place to sit in which shews that it was opposed in thos dais intimating that som Schismatic Spirits opposed the Ecclesiastic Hierarchy then as Disciplinarians did since which is no warrant so to doo 2. That among Pastors Elders and Deacons in every Church one was chosen by the rest to propone matters whether doubts to be debated censures to be decreed or elections to be determined who gathered voices and was the common mouth to moderat the whol Assembly A learned lesson to shew that Episcopal Government jumps just like Germans lips with Genevan Presbytery as if they should shake hands who shape al to their own cut as an old Dotard at Athens deemed al ships his own which cam into the Haven Howbeit they differ diversly among themselfs For Cartwright 〈◊〉 draws the Elderships origin from Moses and Aaron who assembled the Elders at Gods command which he interprets of Laics but Gallaesius of Preachers Peâ—â—itan Berâ—ram and Siniler of Civil Rulers Senators and Princes Beza brings proof out of Moses Pentateuch Chronicles and Prophets But Calvin the Founder saith The Jews Sanedrim was founded after their Captivity being then inhibited to creat a King yet the seventy being instituted by Jethros advise were a lawful Polity allowed by God to censure maners and Doctrins The titles given to Ministers in the new Testament Acts 10. 28 Acts 26. 16. Rom. 15. 16. 1 Cor. 14. 32. Phil. 1. 1. 1 Tim. 3. 2. Beza Junius and Cartwright ascribe to their Elders which Calvin applies to al Ministers Thus they run som into Egypt before the Law som to Mount Sinai in the Wildernes som elswher to seek their Eldership yet cannot find it but agree like Saâ—sons tail-tied Foxes Wher any mention is made of Elders Congregation Church Court Bishops Rulers Thrones Christs Kingdom c. Beza Junius Danaeus Cartwright and that cru imagin it to ring a peal for their Presbyterian platform suting the Scriptures to their tunes For as poor folks beget Children but know not how to keep them so Sectists breed or broch new Opinions and seek Scriptures to maintain them who as Hilary saith care not what the words mean but put their own meaning on them Lastly Listen how highly they prais themselfs and Hyperbolicaly Eudogâ—es extol their Disciplin We hav Christ and his Apostles with al the Prophets for us We striv for everlasting truth which God hath left and may not leav it the matters we meddle in are according to Gods Wil in his Word We propound his Caus faithfully and for it are persecuted We are his poor Servants painful Ministers zelous Professors feeders of his Flock Christs litle ones the foolish things of this World chosen to confound the wise of immortal seed lawful successors to thos who by Faith quenched the violence of fire unreprovable modest most worthy Watchmen We hold nothing not taught in Scripture but what old and new Writers affirm and exemples of primitiv times confirm We seek not to pleas Men or pleasure our selfs but patiently abide til the Lord bring our righteousnes to light and just dealing as the noon day We merit prais of the Law and of Gods Church seeking only to doo good our zele is parallel to that of Moses Elias the Prophets John Baptist Paul the Apostles and Christ Our side detests sin and wickednes our Ministers suffer al evil at Magistrats hands for refusing to doo evil at their commands professing to