things Our first parents not content with their first estate must needes be as God Nadab and Abihu offer sacrifice to God but the fire must be of their owne appointment King Achas will offer sacrifice to God but the altar must be like the altar at Damascus False-teachers beside the doctrine of the Apostles had profound learning of their owne The Iewes beside the written law of Moses must haue their Cabala containing as they supposed more mysticall and excellent doctrine The Papists beside the written word set vnwritten Tradition which they make equall with the Scripture We that professe the Gospel are not altogether free from this fault We like that Christ should be preached but sermons are not in common reputation learned neither doe they greatly please the most vnlesse they be garnished with skill of arts tongues and varietie of reading this curiousnes and discontentment the Lord condemnes when he forbids plowing with the oxe and the asse and the wearing of garments of linsi-wolsie And it is the worst kind of discontment that is in things pertaining to saluation It is called by Paul the itching of the care and it is incident to them that follow their owne lusts The remedie of this sinne is to learne the first lesson that is to be lear ned of them that are to be good schollers in the schoole of Christ and that is to feele our pouertie and in what extreame neede we stand of the death and passion of Christ and withall to hunger thirst after Christ as the bread and water of life Read Isa. 44. 3. Ioh. 7. 37. Psal. 25. 11. the example of Dauid Psal. 143. 6. When the heart and conscience hath experimentally learned this lesson and not the braine and tongue alone then shall men beginne to sauour the things of God and discerne of things that differ and put a difference betwene grace and workes mans word and Gods word and for the working of our saluation esteeme of mans workes and mans word as offols that are cast to dogges Paul addes which is not another Gospel that is though it be an other gospel in the reputation of false teachers yet indeede it is not an other but is a subuersion of the Gospel of Christ. Hēce I gather that there is but one Gospel one in number and no more For there is but one way of saluation by Christ whereby all the Elect are saued from the beginning of the world to the ende Act. 15. 11. 1. Cor. 10. 3. It may be demanded how they of the old Testament could be partakers of the bodie blood of Christ which then was not Answer The bodie and blood of Christ though then it was not subsisting in the world yet was it then present to all beleeuers two waies first by diuine acceptation because God did accept the incarnation and passion of Christ to come as if it had beene accomplished Secondly it was present to them by meanes of their faith which is a subsistance of things that are not seene and consequently it makes them present to the beleeuing heart Againe hence it appeares to be a falshood that Euery man may be saued in his owne religion so be it he hold there is a God and that he is a rewarder of them that come vnto him For there is but one Gospel and if the former opinion were true then so many opinions so many gospels Paul saith that the world by her wisdome could not know God in his wisdome and for this cause he ordained the preaching of the word to saue men 1. Cor. 1. 21. And though he that comes to God must beleeue that he is and that he is a rewarder of them that come to him yet not euery one that beleeues generally that there is a God and that he is a rewarder of them that come to him comes to God for this the deuills beleeue The fourth point is concerning the Authors of this Reuolt and Paul chargeth them with two crimes The first is that they trouble the Galatians not onely because they make diuisions but because they trouble their consciences setled in the gospel of Christ. It may be alleadged that there be sundrie good things which trouble the conscience as the preaching of the law the censure of excommunication the authoritie of the magistrate in compelling Recusants to the congregation I answer these things indeede trouble the consciences of men but they are euill consciences and the ende of this trouble is that they may be reformed and made good But the crime wherewith the false-apostles are charged is that they trouble the consciences of the godly or the good consciences of men Here then is set downe a note whereby false and erroneous doctrines may be discerned namely that they serue onely to trouble and disquiet the good conscience And by this we see the Romane religion to be corrupt and vnsound for a great part of it tends this way Iustification by workes is a yoke that none could euer beare Act. 15. The vowe of single life is as a snare or as the noose in the halter to strangle the soule 1. Cor. 7. 34. So is the doctrine which teacheth that men after their conuersion must still remaine in suspence of their saluation and that pardon of sinne is necessarily annexed to confession in the eare to satisfaction for the temporall punishment of sinne in this life or in purgatory On the contrary the Gospell of Christ as here it appeares troubles not the good conscience but it brings peace and perfect ioy Iohn 15. 11. Rom. 15. 4. And the reason is plaine for it ministers a perfect remedy for euery sinne and comfort sufficient for euery distresse And this is a note whereby the gospell is discerned from all other doctrines whatsoeuer The second crime where with the false-false-apostles are charged is that they ouerthrow the gospell of Christ the reason of this charge must be considered They did not teach a doctrine flat contrary to the Gospell of Christ but they maintained it in word and put an addition to it of their owne out of the law namely instification and saluation by the workes thereof And by reason of this addition Paul giues the sentence that they peruer◠and turne vpside downe the Gospell of Christ. Vpon this ground it appeares that the Popish religion is a flat subuersion of the Gospell of Christ because it ioynes iustification by workes with free iustification by Christ. The excuse that the works that iustify are workes of grace and not of nature will not serue the turne For if Christ by his grace make workes to iustifie then is he not onely a sauiour but also an instrument to make vs sauiours of our selues he beeing the first and principall sauiour and we subordinate sauiours vnto him But if Christ haue a partner in the worke of iustification and saluation he i◠no perfect Christ. 8. But though we or an angell from heauen preach vnto you otherwise then
bondage 5 To whome we gaue not place by subiection for an houre that the truth of the Gospel might continue with you Paul had said before that Titus was not compelled to be circumcised now he addes For all the false brethren that is though the false brethren did what they could to the contrarie Here then Paul sets downe who were the cause that Titus was not circumcised namely certaine persons at Ierusalem and them he sets forth by two properties they are false brethren and they crept into the Church Touching the first by it we learne that the Church of God vpon earth euen when it is at the best hath wicked men and hypocrites in it In Adams family there is Cain in the Arke there is Cham in Christs family or schoole there is Iudas In the Church of Ierusalem planted and gouerned by the chiefe Apostles there be false brethren The true sheepe be often without and wolues within Therefore we may not so much as dreame of a perfection of the Church of God vpon earth so long as wicked men be mixed with true beleeuers Againe these aduersaries of Paul are called false brethren because they ioyned Circumcision with Christ as a necessarie cause of iustification and saluation Hence it followes that the Church of Rome is a false Church because it ioynes workes with Christ in the case of our iustification and that as meritorious causes Their second propertie is that they crept into the Church which I conceiue on this manner The Church of God is as a sheepefold or house Ioh. 10. 1. Christ is the onely dore Now Pastours that teach Christ aright are saide to enter in by this dore they which teach any other way of saluation are said to clime in an other way and they which teach Christ ioyning some other thing with him in the cause of saluation are said to Creepe in because in appearance they maintaine Christ and yet because they adde something to Christ they neither enter nor continue in the true Church with any good warrant from God In this they are like the serpent Liuing creatures were all placed in Eden and Man was placed in the garden of Eden called Paradise and so were not beasts How then comes the serpent in why in all likelihood it crept in And so doe false brethren into the Church Hence I gather that false brethren are not true and liuely members of the visible Church though they be members in appearance For if they were in their right place they should not be said to creepe in The true members of the Church creepe not into the mysticall bodie but are built and set vpon the foundation by God It may be alleadged that they are baptised and thereby made members of the Church I answer that faith makes vs members of Christ and consequently of the true Church and baptisme doth but seale our insition into Christ and serues as a meanes of Admission into the outward societie of the congregation and the outward washing doth not make any man a member of Christ. Againe it followes hence that false brethren are not members of the Catholike church For the visible church is part of the Catholike and therefore they which are not reall members of the true visible church are not members of the Catholike Againe in that false brethren creepe into the congregation hence it appeares that no man can set downe the precise time when errours had their beginning For the authors thereof enter in secretly not obserued of men The enuious man sowes his tares when men be asleepe Math. 13. It sufficeth therefore if we can shew them to be errours by the word though we cannot designe the set time when they began The time when a shippe sinketh we often obserue but the time when it first drew water we doe not Let the Papists thinke vpon this Paul hauing thus declared who were the causes that Titus was not circumcised goes on and shewes how they were causes The effect and summe of his declaration is this They vrged the obseruation of the Ceremoniall law as necessarie and hereupon we resused to circumcise Titus First therefore Paul sets downe how they vrged circumcision and that by three degrees First they come in priuily Secondly they spie out their libertie Thirdly they labour to bring them into bondage Againe Paul sets downe the manner of their refusall in three things We gaue not place for an houre We gaue not place by subiection We gaue no place that the truth of the Gospel might continue with you The first degree or steppe in their vrging of circumcision was that They came in priuily that is they ioyned themselues in fellowship with the Apostles in shew pretended the furtherance of the Gospel yet indeed meant nothing lesse though their fraud wickednes was not perceiued Here then the foūdation they lay of all their naughtie dealing is their dissēbling which Paul here notes condemns On the contrarie our dutie is to be indeed that which we professe our selues to be to professe no more outwardly then we are inwardly and to approue our hearts to god for that which we professe before mē The second steppe or degree is that they spie out the libertie vvhich Paul and the rest had by Christ that is they conferre with the Apostles and inquire of them what libertie they haue by Christ in respect of the Ceremoniall lawe of God and this they doe not of a minde desirous to learne but for aduantage sake There be two kinds of spying one lawefull the other vnlawefull Lawefull as when in iust and lawefull warre we inquire into the counsells and doings of our enemtes Numb 13. 1. Vnlawefull when men prie into any thing or matter to finde a fault Thus hypocrites spie faults in the persons and liues of men that they may haue somwhat whereby to disgrace them Math. 7. 4. Thus Atheists prie into the scriptures that they may confute them Thus sundrie hearers come to sermōs that they may carpe Thus our enemies inquire into our religion that they may finde as they suppose exceptions vntruthes and contradictions And in the Church of Ierusalem false brethren inquire how farre Christian liberty extends that they may ouerthrow it This kind of spying is a common fault we must take heede of it and apply the eie of our minde to a better vse First we are to be spies in respect of our owne sinnes and corruptions to spie them out Lam. 3. 40. Let us search our waies and inquire and turne againe to the Lord. Again we are to plaie the spies in respect of our spirituall enemies that we may finde out the temptations of the flesh the world and the deuill Thirdly we must be as spies in searching of the Scriptures Ioh. 5. 39. that we may vnderstand the words of the lawe of God and find comfort to our soules The third and last degree of vrging is that the false brethren seeke to bring the Apostles in bondage
the second reproofe before witnesses we must proceede no further but rest there as before if not we must relate it to the Church if he heare the Church there is no further proceedings to be vsed if he heare not the Church he is to be excommunicated and holden as a heathen Offenders therefore are not to be excommunicated at the very first but orderly to be proceeded against and louingly to be dealt withall and patiently to be endured according as the Apostle commandeth 2. Tim. 4. 2. reprooue with all long suffering It may be obiected that Paul biddeth Titus he should auoyd an hereticke after once or â—wise admonition Tit. 3. 10. Therefore we are not to proceed against offenders according to Christs commandement Ans. That text makes nothing against this orderly proceeding commended vnto vs by our Sauiour Christ. For first this commandement is not giuen to all but onely to the Pastors as here to Titus or Bishops who representing the whole Church are to giue sentence of excoÌ„munication Secondly it is to be vnderstood of publike admonition in the face of the Church after that the partie hath bin priuately dealt withall and if after this admonition he doe not recaâ—t his errours and reforme himselfe then is he to be reiected as an heretike that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 condemned of his owne selfe Tit. 3. 11. Neuerthelesse there be certaine cases in which we are not bound to followe this order or manner of proceeding in our reproofes and they are principally three I. When the sinne committed tendeth to the hurt of the Church or common wealth and there be danger in delay as also danger to the partie that is priuie to it and doeth not detect it and small hope of hindering of it as when a man doth plot treason or intermedleth in treasonable practises in this case the paâ—tie offending is not first priuately to be reprooued but publikely to be detected and so to be dealt withall of the Magistrate according to the nature and qualitie of his offence for the common good is to be preferred before any one mans priuate good better it is that one man perish then that the bond of vnitie should be broken II. When the fault is greater if it be committed then the losse of his credit that committed it though it be published For example if one intend to slay another and lie in waite for him in this case we are not bound priuately to admonish the partie intending murther or bloodshed but to detect him to the magistrate for his life is to be preferred before the mans credit that sought his life When Pauls kinsman to wit his si sters sonne heard that aboue 40 men had conspired together and bound themselues with an oath that they would neither eate nor drinke till they had killed Paul he doeth not goe and reprooue them for this fact but relates it to Paul and Paul hearing of it doth not counsell him to goe and reprooue them first and if they would not harken to him to take two or thee witnesses c. but sent him straight to the cheife captaine that he might take order to preuent their bloodie attempt III. When a man is assured priuate reproofe will doe no good and that the partie offending will not brooke it nor take reproofe at his hand he is not to followe that order and manner of reproofe but to acquaint them with it that can and will redresse it Thus Ioseph as it may seeme did not reprooue his brethren because he knewe well they would not be bettered by him seeing they hated him but he brought vnto his father their euill sayings Gen. 38. 2. Albeit others say that their sinne was publike and therefore needed no priuate admonition and others that he did admonish theÌ„ secretly before he did relate it to his father althogh it be not expressely set down in the text Howsoeuer this example be vnderstood the rule is certaine that priuate reproofe is to be omitted when it will either doe hurt or no good 2. Beare ye one anothers burdens and so fulfill the lawe of Christ. In this verse the Apostle propounds another rule touching brotherly loue and it dependeth vpon the former as an answer to a secret obiection which might be made vpon the former doctrine in the 1. verse in this manner Thou enioynest vs we should restore our brother if he fall by occasion into any sinne in the spirit of meekenesse but there are some infirmities in our brethren which cannot be amended nor redressed by brotherly correction what is to be done in such a case The Apostle answereth such infirmities must be borne and tollerated in these words Beare ye one anothers burdens And this rule is enforced by an argument taken froÌ„ the excellencie therof in that the practising of it is the keeping and fulfilling of the whole law in these words And so fulfill the lawe of Christ. First for the rule The Apostle calleth slippes infirmities sinnes by the name of burdens taking his metaphor from trauellers who vse to ease one another by carrying one anothers burdeÌ„ either wholly or in part that so they may more cheerefully and speedily goe on in their iourney Mens burdens are of two sorts either such as euery man is to beare by himselfe alone without shifting them off his own shoulder and laying them vpon other men of which we are to intreat when we come to the fift verse Or such as may be borne of others as well as of our selues of these the Apostle speaketh in this place when he saith Beare ye one anothers burdens and there are foure sorts of them First those whereof our brethren may either be wholly disburdened or in part eased such is the heauie burden of pouertie sickenesse nakednesse hunger thirst banishment imprisonment c. Secondly the outward and bodily wants that are in sundrie persons as blindnesse deafenesse maimednesse lamenesse c. Thirdly personall or actuall sins of men as anger hatred iealousie enuie c. Lastly outward frailties in the actions of mens liues which are not felt oftentimes of those that are subiect vnto them but are heauie burdens to others with whome they conuerse as curiousnesse nicenesse flownesse selfe-conceitednes frowardnes hastines and such like The two first forts are to be borne three waies First by hauing a holy sympathie and fellow-seeling of them in weeping with those that weepâ—â— and in remembring those that are in bonds as though we were bound with them those that are in affliction as if we were also afflicted in the bodie Ebr. 13. v. 3. This was Pauls practise 2. Cor. 11. 29. Who is weake and I am not weake who is offended and I burne not Secondly by bearing with them in their wants and infirmities according to that of the Apostle Beare with the weake 1. Thes. 5. 14. Thirdly by putting vnder our shoulders and bearing part of the burden with them in helping and easing of them in their necessities Rom.
properties of loue reckned vp by S. Paul 1. Cor. 13. this is not the least that it suffereth all things v. 7. that is all such things as may be borne and suffered with good conscience for the good of our brother For looke as a louer doth suffer all things in regard of his loue in three respects First in vndergoing any labour that may be for her good as Hercules did for the loue of Omphale Secondly in bearing patiently all hard measure that is offered him for her sake as Iacob did for the loue of Rachel Thirdly in induring any thing that is imposed vpon him and putting vp what wrong soeuer is done vnto him by her as Sampson did for the loue of Dalilah So Christian charitie causeth vs to suffer all things First pro fratribus to indure any labour cost or trauell for their good Secondly propter fratres to beare all afflictions for their sakes as Paul saith he did for the Church 2. Tim. 2. 10. Thirdly à fratribus to beare wrongs and put vp iniuries at their hands as he did beeing shamefully entreated at Philippi stoned scourged c. This must be considered of vs all but specially of such as wil giue a man as good as he bringeth who are but a word and a blow a lie and a stab a word a writ such as cannot beare coales as they say nor brook any little wrōg nor endure any small frailtie in their brethren These men must remēber that in bearing coales that is in suffering and forbearing they heape vp coales of fire vpon their heads as Paul speaketh Rom. 12. 20. as also that God doth beare with them in greater matters euen when they wound him with their oathes Leuit. 24. 11. and giue him the lie thorough vnbeleefe 1. Ioh. 5. 10. as he bare the manners of the Israelites in the wildernes That Christ whose example we are to follow hath borne our infirmities Esa. 53. and doth ease them that trauell and are heauie laden Matth. 11. 28. and therefore we treading in his steppes must forbeare one another and forgiue one another if any man haue a quarrell against another euen as Christ forgaue vs. Coloss. 3. 13. Thus if when we see any sinne in our brother we reclaime him from it by reproofes exhortations admonitions we are Gods instruments to saue a soule from death and so doe couer a multitude of sinnes euen before God Iam. 5. 20. And if when we perceiue common frailties in our brethren we shal not stand too much vpō our right but shall yeeld vnto them in bearing forbearing and forgiuing we shall couer a multitude of sinnes before men 1. Pet. 4. 8. Thus much touching the rule Now I proceede to the reason whereby the Apostle vrgeth the practise of this precept in these words And so fulfill the law of Christ. The reason standeth thus That which is the fulfilling of the law of Christ must be practised of vs but the bearing of one anothers burdens is the fulfilling of the law of Christ therefore we ought to beare one anothers burdens For the clearing of this text sundrie things are to be considered I. It may be demanded what the Apostle vnderstandeth by the law of Christ Ans. Nothing els but the doctrine precept or commaedement of Christ enioyning the loue of our brethren Ioh. 13. 34 35. A new commandement giue I vnto you that ye loue one another as I haue loued you c. And it is all one as if he had saide Beare ye one anothers burdens and so fulfill the commandement of Christ who hath after a speciall manner commanded the loue of your brethren Now the Apostle rather vseth the word Law then Commandement because he would make a clearer antithesis betwixt the law of Christ and the law of Moses so vehemently vrged by the false Apostles as if he should haue said You Galatians are taught to obserue the Law of Moses circumcision daies and times moneths and yeares and so ye doe indeede Well if ye will needes be obseruing of Lawes here is a law for you to obserue beare with the frailties one of another and so you shal fulfill the most excellent law that euer was the law of Christ which is necessarie to be kept whereas the keeping of the Ceremoniall law is but in vaine II. Quest. Why doth Paul call the loue of our brethren the law of Christ rather then the law of nature or the law of God or the law of Moses seeing it was written in the minde of man in the creation was giuen by God himselfe in Mount Sinai was written by Moses the reliques whereof are yet remaining in the minde of man Ans. It is so called because it is a new commandement giuen by Christ himselfe after a speciall manner But it is hereupon further demanded why this commandement of louing our brethren should be called a new commandement To which some make answer that it is so called onely because it shewes a new manner of louing our brethren after the example of Christ as he hath loued vs. Now this manner of louing our brethren as Chrysostome expounds it is this that as Christ loued vs freely not mooued by any amiable thing in vs nor for any profit that should redound vnto himselfe thereby so we should freely loue one another not for any benefit receiued or expected But as Cyril of Alexand. vpon Iohn expounds it it stands in this that as Christ loued vs more then himselfe so we should loue our brethren more then our selues But this cannot be the meaning For S. Iohn in his 1. Epist. 2. and Epist. 2. repeating this new commandement saith onely this is a new commandement that ye loue one another and neuer addes as Christ loued vs the which he should haue done if these wordes as I haue loued you be an essentiall part of the new commandement which he enioyneth vs to obserue Besides our Sauiour himselfe saith a little after By this shall all men knowe that ye are my Disciples if ye loue one another not adding as I haue loued you therefore the new commandement is laid downe in these words Loue one another not respecting those that follow as a modification or limitation as I haue loued you Besides this exposition takes it for granted that the morall lawe Loue thy neighbour as thy selfe is a certaine rule by which we are to square our loue vz. that we must begin at our selues look how much we loue our selues so much we ought to loue our neighbor no more that therfore Christ shold giue a newe commandement of greater perfection then that in the lawe to wit that we loue one another as he loued vs that is more then our selues But this is a flat mistaking of the scripture for the commandement Loue thy neighbour as thy selfe is no exact rule whereby we are to trie and examine our loue as the Popish doctors and some others teach For then Paul and diuers of the Saints of God
temple And thus hoping that these respects may entreate for a friendly acceptance at thy hands and that thou wilt afforde mee thy good word for my good will and a fauorable construction for my paines I commend it to the blessing of the Almightie and thee to his gratious protection vnfainedly wishing to thee as to my selfe the mercie of God in Christ Iesus August 10. Thine in the Lord Iesus R. C. Faults escaped in some copies are thus to be corrected Pag. lin Fault correct 25 30 building binding 70 28 degree decree 86 27 Christin Christian ibidem  refuse refused 105 4 Prov. 14. 24. 136 3 seach search 153 4 7 47 164 25 begunne beginne 176 24 happily haply 241 5 reuealed conceiued 360 33 it is 402 1 come came 440 16 maginations imaginatioÌ„s 461 29 foole foote 469 23 notes motes 472 38 Recidauation RecidiuatioÌ„ 473 7 the thiefe thiefe 478 30 Quaerenda Quâ—rendo 480 17 Supposes Supposals 482 25 perfunctorie defunctorie 482 37 thâ— the 490 38 heard hard 505 36 thought though 556 23 equall equall 559 26 our an 585 8 see seeing 612 3 Peter Peters 647 14 o other In the Epistle to the Reader for hath read haue CHAP. 1 THE EPISTLE OF S. PAVL TO THE GALATIANS The Argument TWo things are generally to be considered the occasion of this Epistle and the Scope The occasion that mooued Paul to write this Epistle was because certen false-false-Apostles slaundered him both in respect of his calling as also in respect of his doctrine teaching that he was no Apostle and that his doctrine was false And by this means they seduced the Churches of Galatia perswading them that iustification and saluation was partly by Christ and partly by the Lawe The Scope of the Epistle is in three things First the Apostle defends his calling in the first and second chapters Secondly he defends the truth of his doctrine teaching iustification by Christ alone And vpon this occasion he handles the greatest question in the world Namely what is that Justice whereby a sinner stands righteous before God in the 3. and 4. and in the beginning of the fift Thirdly he prescribes rules of good life in the fift and sixt chapters 1. Paul an Apostle not of men nor by man but by Iesus Christ and God the father who raised him from the dead THe Epistle hath 3. parts a Preface an Instruction and the Conclusion The preface is in the fiue first verses and it hath two parts an inscription and a Salutation The inscription sets downe the persons that write the Epistle and the persons to whome it is sent The persons that write are two Paul the Brethren Paul is mentioned in the first verse In which in comely and decent manner he commende himselfe to the Galatians by his office and function as Apostle that is one called to be a planter and founder of the Church of the newe Testament among the nations And because the title of an Apostle in generall signification may agree to all teachers therefore he goes further and sets downe the cause of his Apostleship And first he remooues the false causes in these words not of men that is not called by men as by Authors of my calling or not called by the authoritie of men And in this Paul opposeth himselse to the false-apostles who were called notby God but by men Againe he saith not by man that is not called of God in and by the ministerie of any meere man And in this Paul opposeth himselfe to all ordinarie ministers of the Gospell whatsoeuer who are called of God by man This done he propounds the true cause and author of his Apostleshippe of whome he was called immediately Against this it may be obiected that Paul was ordained to be an Apostle by the imposition of haÌ„ds of the Church of Antioch I answer that this imposition was rather a confirmation then a calling Secondly they of Antioch had not imposed hands on Paul but that they were commanded by the spirit of God Further Paul addes that he was called by Christ and God the father for three causes The first was to signifie the consent of will in the father and Christ. The second was to teach vs howe we are to conceiue of God namely that he is the Father and Iesus Christ and the Holy Ghost for the Godhead may not be conceiued out of the trinitie of persons The third is because the father is the fountaine of all good things that come to vs by Christ. Lastly he sets downe the effect or action of the Father who raised him from the dead and that for two causes One was to prooue Christ to be the naturall sonne of God for he professed himselfe to be so and that was one cause why he was crucified and put to death Nowe when he was dead if he had not bin the sonne of God indeede he had neuer risen againe but had perished in death And in that the father raised him againe to life he gaue testimonie that he was his own naturall sonne And therefore Paul saith that Christ was declared to be the sonne of God by the resurrection from the dead and he applies the words of the Psalme thou art my sonne this day haue I begotten thee to the time of Christs resurrection Againe Paul mentions the resurrection of Christ to note the time of his owne calling for though the rest of the Apostley were called when Christ was in the estate of humiliation yet Paul was called afterwards when Christ was entred into his kingdome and sate at the right hand of his father The vse First whereas Paul in the very fore front of his Epistle beginnes with his owne calling I gather that euery minister of the Gospell ought to haue a good and lawefull calling A man cannot preach vnlesse he be sent Christ tooke not vnto him the office of a Mediatour till he was called and sent of the Father Therefore the opinion of the Anabaptist is foolish and phantasticall who thinke that euery man may preach that will without any speciall calling They alleadge that the house of Stephanas ordaine themselues to the Ministerie of the Saints Answer the meaning of the place is not that they called themselues but that they set themselues apart to the ministerie of the Saints in the purpose and resolution of their owne hearts Againe they alleadge that all Christians in the newe Testament are Kings and Priests and the office of the priest is to teach I answer all are priests in that they are to offer themselues in sacrifice to God and to teach priuately within their places and callings as the master his seruants the father his children c and to make a confession of their faith when they are called so to doe Thirdly they alleadge that the power of the keies is giuen to the Church I answer it is indeed yet so as the vse and administration thereof belongs to the Ministers alone in the
teach otherwise then I haue taught you neither I nor they must be beleeued but be accursed Againe put the case that an angell from heauen should come and preach otherwise then Paul preached to the Galatians who must be beleeued Paul or the Angel the answer is not the Angell but Paul and the angel must be accursed And the reason is because Paul in preaching and writing did represent the authoritie of God and God puts his owne authoritie into the word which he vttered and he was assisted by the extraordinarie immediate and infallible assistance of Gods spirit From this supposition sundrie things may be learned The first that the word preached and written by Paul is as certen as if it had bin written by God himselfe immediately It may be obiected that Paul saith 1. Cor. 7. 12. To the remnant I speake not the Lord. I answer Paul saith I not the Lord not because he was deceiued in his aduise for he spake by the spirit of God c. 7. v. 40. but because he gaue counsell in a case of marriage whereof the Lord had made no expresse lawe The meaning then is this I speake by collection from the lawe of God and not the Lord by any particular and expresse lawe Secondly it appeares hence that the articles of faith or the doctrine of the Gospell is in excellencie and authoritie aboue all men and angeis And hence it followes that the Church and Councels cannot authorize the word of God in the minde conscience of any man For the inferiour and dependent authoritie addes nothing to that which is the principall and superior authoritie Therefore the opinion of the Papist is false that we cannot knowe the scripture to be the word of God but by the testimony of the Church as though the letter of a Prince could not be knowne to be so without the testimonie of the subiects The principall authoritie is sufficient in it selfe to authorize it selfe without externall testimonie Thirdly since the daies of the Apostles sundrie doctrines haue bin receiued and beleeued touching intercession of Saints praier to the dead and for the dead Purgatorie and such like and these doctrines haue bin confirmed by sundrie revelations And here we learne what to iudge both of the doctrines and of the reuelations namely that they are accursed because the doctrines are beside the written word and the reuelations tend to ratifie and confirme them Lastly hence we learne what to thinke of the writings of Papists and Schoolemen whereof some are called Seraphicall cherubicall or Angelicall doctors They broch and maintaine sundrie things beside that which the Apostles preached wrote as iustification by workes and a mixture of the lawe and the Gospell they giue too little to grace and too much to mans will In this regard Paul hath giuen the sentence that they are accursed For this cause students of diuinitie are warily to read them with praier that they be not led into temptation and they are to vse them onely in the last place And they are greatly to be blamed that preferre them almost aboue all writers they shewe that they haue little loue of the Gospell in their hearts 9 As we said before so say I now againe if any man preach vnto you otherwise then ye haue receiued let him be accursed In these words Paul repeates againe that which he said before and the repetition is not in vaine but for three weightie causes the first is to signifie that he had spoken not rashly but aduisedly whatsoeuer he had said before the second is that the point deliuered is an infallible truth of God the third is to put the Galatians and vs in minde that we are to obserue and remember that which he hath said as the foundation of our religion namely that the doctrine of the Apostles is the onely infallible truth of God against which we may not listen to Fathers Councels or to the very Angels of God If this had bin remembred and obserued the Gospel had continued in his puritie after the daies of the Apostles In this verse one thing is to be obserued Before Paul saide they are accursed which teach otherwise then he had taught here he saith they are accursed which teach otherwise then the Galatians had receiued Whereby it appeares that as Paul preached the Gospel of Christ so the Galatians receiued it And they receiued it first in that they had care to know it secondly in that they gaue the assent of faith vnto it as to a truth against which the very Angels could take no exception And for this also are the Thessalonians commended that the Gospel was to them in power and much assurance The great fault of our times is that where as the Gospel is preached it is not accordingly receiued Many haue no care to know it and they which know it giue not vnto it the assent of faith but onely hold it in opinion And this is the cause that there is so small fruit of the Gospel This sinne will at length haue his punishment The places that are not seasoned by the waters of the Sanctuarie are turned to saltpits Ezech. 47. v. 11. 10 For now whether preach I men or God or seeke I to please men for if I should yet please men I were not the seruant of Christ. The interrogations in this place doe I preach and doe I please are in stead of earnest negations I doe not preach I doe not please And when he saith doe I now preach men or God his meaning is this Heretofore I haue preached the Traditions of men but now beeing an Apostle I preach not the doctrine of men but of God And when he saith doe I seeke to please men his meaning is this I doe not make this the scope of my mini sterie to frame and temper my doctrine so as it may be sutable and pleasing to the affections of men For otherwise we are to please men in that which is good and for their good 1. Cor. 10. 33. Rom. 15. 2. This verse containes a double reason of his former speach and of the repitition thereof The first is this Though heretofore I taught the Traditions of men yet now I teach the word not of men but of God and therefore I accurse them that teach otherwise The second is framed thus If I should yet please men I were not the seruant of God but I am the seruant of God therefore I seeke not to please men but if neede shal be I will denounce curses against them Here first we see the proper matter of the Ministerie which is not the word or doctrine of man but of God By this the Ministers of the Gospel are taught to handle their doctrine with modestie and humilitie without ostentation with reuerence and with a consideration of the maiestie of God whose the doctrine is which they vtter that God may be glorified 1. Pet. 4. 11. Secondly the hearers in hearing are to know that they haue to
publish and declare whome God calleth by Examination of parties for life and doctrine by Election and by ordination This is for substance all that the Church can doe and all this is allowed and prescribed by the lawes of this Church and land And therefore our callings for their substance are diuine whatsoeuer defects there be otherwise This assurance that our callings are of God is of great vse It makes the Minister to make a conscience of his dutie it is his comfort in trouble Isa. 49. 2. 2. Cor. 2. 15. And to the hearers it is a meanes of great reuerence and obedience 12 For neither receiued I it of man neither was I taught it but by the reuelation of Iesus Christ. The meaning is this Paul here saith he receiued not the Gospel of man because he receiued not the office to teach and preach the Gospel from any meere man For here he speakes of himselfe as he was an Apostle and then an Apostle properly is said to receiue the Gospel when he receiues not onely to know and beleeue it but also to preach it And he addes further that he was not taught it that is that he learned the Gospel not by the teaching of any man as formerly he learned the law at the feete of Gamaliel The last words but by the reuelation of Iesus Christ carrie this sense but I learned and receiued it of Christ who taught me by reuelation Further Reuelation is twofold one ordinarie the other extraordinarie Ordinarie is when Christ teacheth men by the word preached and by his spirit In this sense the holy Ghost is called the spirit of reuelation Eph. 1. 17. Extraordinarie is with the word preached and that foure waies First by voice Thus God taught Adam and the Patriarkes The second by dreames when things reuealed were represented to the minde in sleepe The third is vision when things reuealed are represented to the outward senses of men beeing awake The fourth is instinct when God teacheth by inward motion and inspiration Thus did God vsually teach the Prophets 2. Pet. 1. 21. Now the reuelation which Paul had was not ordinarie but extraordinarie and that partly by vision partly by voice and partly by instinct Act. 9. 22. It may here be demanded where Christ was whether on earth or in heauen because Paul heard his voice saw him visibly I answer he was not on earth but in heauen and that Paul both saw and heard him it was by miracle whereas Stephen in like manner saw Christ he saw him not on earth but standing at the right hand of God in heauen for otherwise the opening of the heauens had bin a needles thing These wordes then are a confirmation of the former verse on this manner The authoritie whereby I teach and the doctrine which I teach I first receiued and learned it not of man but immediatly of Christ therefore the Gospel which I preach is not humane but diuine and preached not by humane but by diuine authoritie In the scope and sense of the words many points of doctrine are contained The first that Christ is the great Prophet and Doctour of the Church Math. 17. 6. Heare him and 23. 8. One is your Doctour namely Christ. And he is called the great shepheard of the sheepe Hebr. 13. 20. His office is in three things The first is to manifest and reueale the will of the father touching the redemption of mankind Ioh. 1. 18. 8. 26. This he hath done from the beginning of the world the father neuer speaking and appearing immediately but in the baptisme and transfiguration of Christ and this he doth to Paul in this place The second is to institute the Ministerie of the word and to call and send Ministers As my father sent me so send I you Ioh. 20. 21. He it is that giues some to be Pastours some to be teachers Eph. 4. 11. And thus appoints Paul to be an Apostle The third is to teach the heart within by illuminating the mind and by working a faith of the doctrine which is taught He openeth the vnderstandings of his Disciples that they may vnderstand the Scriptures Luk. 24. 45. Thus here he inlightneth and teacheth Paul Furthermore it must be obserued that this office of teaching is inseparably annexed to the person of Christ and is by him accordingly exequuted euen after his ascension as appeares in the conuersion of Paul And therefore Isai saith they shall be all taught of God Isa. 54. 13. As for the Ministers of the Gospel they in teaching are no more but instrumēts of Christ to vtter and pronounce the word to the eare this is all they can doe Therefore Paul saith he that plants or waters is not any thing but God that giueth the increase The teacher then properly in the ministerie of the new Testament to the very ende of the world is Christ himselfe This must teach vs reuerence in hearing Gods word and care with diligence in keeping of it Hebr. 2. 1 2 3 c. Secondly this teacheth vs that they which imbrace not the Gospel among vs are contemners of Christ and shall indure eternall condemnation Ioh. 3. 18. Hebr. 12. 25. Thirdly if we want vnderstanding we must pray to Christ for it and because we haue so excellent a teacher we must pray vnto him that he would giue vnto vs hearing eares that is hearts tractable and obedient to his word that we may be fitte disciples for so worthie a master The second is that there be two waies whereby Christ teacheth those that are to be teachers One is immediate reuelation the other is ordinarie instruction in schooles by the means and ministerie of man The like saith Amos I was neither Prophet nor sonne of a Prophet but the Lord sent me to prophecie to Israel Amos 7. 14. The third point is that They which are to be teachers must first be taught and they must teach that which they haue first learned themselues 2. Tim. 3. 14. Abide in the things which thou hast learned Christ taught that which he heard of the father the Apostles that which they heard of Christ ordinarie ministers that which they haue learned of the Apostles This is the right Tradition and if it be obserued without addition or detraction the Gospel shall remaine in his integritie Here our Auncetours are greatly to be blamed who haue not contented themselues with that which they haue learned of the Apostles but haue deliuered things of their owne which they were neuer taught Hence sprang vnwritten traditions and the corruption of religion Againe such are here to be blamed that take vpon them to be teachers of the Gospel and were neuer taught by reuelation or by any ordinarie way Thirdly priuate persons are much more to be blamed that broch and deliuer such doctrines and opinions as they themselues neuer learned by any ministery For teachers themselues must first learne and then teach The fourth point is that they which are to be teachers
is the time when in these words then after fourteene yeares Here two questions are to be demaunded The first is of which of his iourneies must this be vnderstood for he made fiue iournies to Ierusalem The first from Arabia the second when he and Barnabas were sent by the Church of the Gentiles to carrie almes to Ierusalem the third when he went to the Councell at Ierusalem the fourth when he went vp for the keeping of his vowe the last is mentioned Act. 19. 21. Answ. These words are not spoken of the first for that was but three yeares after his conuersion neither can they well be vnderstood of the second because Paul then was sent by the Church and therefore he went not by reuelation And they cannot well be vnderstood of the third for then Paul would here haue mentioned the Councell of Ierusalem whereof he was a principall member specially seeing he hath occasion so to doe and it serued much for his purpose The fourth fifth iourneys were after a longer time then fourteene yeares It is likely therefore that this iourney here mentioned and described by Paul is none of the fiue mentioned by Luke but some other The second question is When these fourteene yeares must beginne Ans. It is vncerten Some thinke they must beginne at his conuersion some three yeares after when Paul went first to Ierusalem and either may be a truth None must here take offeÌ„ce For though circumstances of time and place beeing things of lesse moment cannot alwaies be certenly gathered yet histories for their substance and doctrines pertaining to saluation are plainly set downe And here we are put in minde to be content to be ignorant in some things because the spirit of God hath more darkly expressed them or againe because we cannot by reason of our blindnes gather them The third point is concerning the companions of Paul in this iourney namely Barnabas and Titus And Paul takes them with him that they might be witnesses to the Iewes of the doctrine he taught among the Gentiles and againe to the Gentiles of the consent that was betweene him and the rest of the Apostles For the law of God is that euery matter shall be established by the testimonie of two or three witnesses Hence we learne that if a question arise of the doctrine which is deliuered in the publike Ministerie then the hearers that are able to iudge must be witnesses and the triall is to be made by them Thus saith Christ in the like case Why aske ye me aske them that heard me Ioh. 18. 21. Therefore great care and circumspection is to be had of things publikely deliuered Againe whereas Paul makes Barnabas a Iew and Titus a Gentile his companions we are taught to imbrace with a brotherly loue not onely the men of our owne countrey but also such as be of other nations specially if they beleeue For then they are all children of one father and pertaine all to one familie and there is no difference of nations now It is a fault therefore that men of one nation carrie in their hearts a generall dislike and hatred oftentimes of them with whome they deale and conuerse and that because they are of such or such countries The fourth point is the cause of his iourney in these words and I went by reuelation Here we are taught that for the iournies we make we are to haue some good and sufficient warrant though not a reuelation yet a commandement or that which counteruailes a commandement as when we trauaile by vertue of our callings When Noe had made the Arke he enters into it at Gods commandement he abides in it and when the earth was in part dried he presumes not to goe out till the Lord bad him Here three sorts of men are to be blamed Pilgrimes that trauell to Ierusalem or other countries in way of merit or religion For they haue no warrant Secondly trauellers that goe from countrey to countrey and out of the precincts of the Church vpon vaine curiositie to see fashions Such when they trauell from their own countries yet they trauell not from their vices but rather goe deeper into them and come home againe with many bad and corrupt fashions The last are beggers Rogues that passe from place to place that they may'l ue in idlenes vpoÌ„ the sweat of other mens brows Thus much of the iourney now followes the Conference in these words and I communicated c. Here generally I gather that Conferences both priuate and publike are laudible and to be maintained specially when they tend to the maintenance of vniâ—ie and consent in doctrine The Papists blame vs Protestants for condemning Conferences as they say and Councells But they doe vs wrong Indeede the Councell of Trent we reiect and condemne For in it against all equitie the Pope was both partie and iudge In it there was no libertie to make triall of truth For nothing was propounded but by the liking and consent of the Pope Againe the whole Councell consisted of such as were of the Italian faction whose faith was pinned on the Popes sleeue Neuerthelesse we allow all Christian Councells lawfully gathered and we desire there might be a Generall Councell for the triall of truth and for the staying of vnsetled minds these three caueats beeing remembred One that the Councell be gathered by Christian Princes to whom the right of calling a Councell belongs The other that the Pope be no iudge but a partie The third that Christ in his word be the iudge and that the Delegates in the Councell be but as witnesses determining all things by the written word In this conference we are first to consider the manner of conferring which was vsed Paul saith he communicated with them that is he laid downe vnto them and expounded the Gospel which he preached and this he did priuatly that is with the Apostles one by one in plaine and familiar manner as one friend doth with an other Therefore for the maintaining of this conference there was no assembly made neither was there any disputation held Onely Paul declares his doctrine and they giue assent Hence it appeares that Paul doth not submit the truth of his doctrine to triall For he was resolued of it and he accursed him that taught otherwise but his intent was to seeke the approbation of the Apostles that he might stop the mouth of his aduersaries The second point is the matter of the conference and that is the Gospel which Paul preached Here the Papist gathereth that the Church is the iudge in all questions pertaining to religion and the word because it is here the thing that is iudged I answer first that they gather amisse For Paul doeth not here submit the Gospel which he preached to the iudgement of the Church of Ierusalem And it is false which they teach for the soueraigne Iudge of all questions and controuersies in religion is Christ alone The power to determine and resolue in cases
of loue and of a sound minde Where he sets downe three caueats First that this libertie in reprouing is not the fruite of a bold and rash disposition but it is a fruit of Gods spirit and so to be acknowledged Read Mich. 3. 8. The secoÌ„d that the vse of this libertie is to be ordered by a sound mind whereby we are able to giue a good ac count of our reproofes both for the matter and manner of them The third is that all our admonitions must be seasoned and tempered with loue that they tend to the good and saluation of them that are reproued These caueats obserued libertie in reproouing shall neuer want his blessing Isai. 50. 7. Thirdly here is an example in Paul of an ingenious ho nest minde When he sees Peter doe amisse he reprooues him to his face Contrarie to this is the common practise in backbiting whispering tale-bearing whereby it comes to passe that when a man is in fault euery man knowes it saue he which is in fault This vice the lawe of God expressely forbids Leu. 19. 16. And it is the propertie of a good man not to take vp a false reporte Psal. 15. And Dauid reproues Soul because he did but lend the eare to tale bearers saying wherefore giuest thou an eare to mens wordes that say behould Dauid seeketh euill against thee 1. Sam. 24. 10. In Peter who when he was reproued made no reply we see an example of patience and humiltie whereby he humbled himselfe before the reprouer when he was conuicted of an offence The like was in Dauid when he said let the righteous smite mee Psal. 141. v. 5. Where as Paul saith that Peter was to be blamed or condemned not in respect of his person but of his example we see that excellent men euen the cheefe Apostles are subiect to erre and be deceiued It may be said howe then may we trust them in their writings I answer while they were in deliuering any thing to the Church whether it were by sermon or wri ting they were guided by the infallible assistance of the spirit and could not erre Otherwise they might erre when they were out of this worke in mind will affection or action Thus Ionas when he saw that Niniue was not destroyed was impotent in his anger Nathan was deceiued in giuing aduise to Dauid touching the building of the temple 2 Sam. 7. The Apostles at the ascension of Christ still dreamed of an earthly kingdome saying When wilt thou restore the kingdome to Israel Act. 1. And Peter beeing bidden to arise and eate of things forbidden by the ceremonial law said Not so Lord Act. 10. 1. 4. Thus then if Peter was subiect to errour the pretended successours of Peter namely the bishops of Rome cannot be free from errour It is alleadged that Peter erred in life and not in doctrine I answer it was so indeed yet did his bad example tend to the ruine of doctrine if it had not bin preuented Therefore the errour that was in acte if we respect the euent was in doctrine Againe I answer that an errour in action presupposeth an errour in minde or at the least some ignorance because the minde is the beginning of the thing done Thus all sinners are called ignorant persons Hebr. 5. 2. And it seemes that the errour of Peter was that of two euils it was the best to choose the lesse that is to choose rather to offend the Gentiles then the Iewes to whome he was an Apostle specially appointed Here againe we miserable wrethes are taught to watch and pray that God would not lead vs into temptation considering most excellent men are subiect to falling And men must be warned not to abuse Peters example in boulstering themselues in their naughtie waies by saying we are all sinners that the best man aliue is a sinner that the iust man falles seuen times a day For the place in the Prouerbs 14. 16. is spoken of affliction and not of sinne the iust man falls seuen times that is he falles into manifould perills And further we should not only consider the faults of iust men but also their conuersion and repentance And againe to sinne and to commit sinne are two diuers things Though the godly sinne yet doe they not keepe a course in sinning and goe on from sinne to sinne v. 12. For before certen came from Iames he ate with the gentiles but when they were come he withdrew himselfe fearing them that were of the circumcision 13. And other Iewes dissembled likewise with him in so much that Barnabas was brought into their dissimulation also The Apostle hath propounded his second answer in the former verse now he proceedes to make a declaration of it And first he sets downe the cause why Peter was reproued and the manner of reprofe The cause is the 12 and 13. verses namely Peters sinne And this sinne is set forth by foure things By the name of the sinne the matter of the sinne the cause of the sinne the effects of the sinne The name of the sinne is noted when Paul saith And other Iewes dissembled likewise with him v. 13. where I gather that Peters sinne was Simulation Simulation of it selfe is a thing indifferent and according to circumstances is either good or euill Lawfull simulation is when men conceit that which they may lawfully conceit and signifie something either by word or deede that is onely beside the truth and not contrarie to it This was the Simulation of Ioseph who carried himselfe as a stranger to his brethren in Egypt after he had examined them and knew who they were Gen. 42. This was the Simulation of Christ who when he was come to Emaus made as though he would haue gone further Luk. 24. 28. Thus Paul among the Iewes plaid the Iewe 1. Cor. 9. 20. Vnlawfull Simulation is that when something is signified or fained against the truth or to the preiudice of any Of this kind was the simulation of Peter which tended to the preiudice of the Gospel and to the offence of the Gentiles The second point is the matter of the sinne or the sinne it selfe which was on this manner First among the Gentiles at Antioch he vseth Christian libertie in eating things forbidden by the ceremoniall law yet after the comming of certen Iewes from Ierusâ—lem he seperates himselfe from the Gentiles and plaies the Iewe among the Iewes Like to this was the halting of the Israelites betweene God and Baal 1. King 18. 21. and the practise of sundrie men who are Protestants with vs and yet in other countries goe to Masse and the practise of our people who change their religion with the times Here we see the great weaknesse of Peter in that vpon a very little occasion and that presently falls away from his profession to his old course In him we may behold our owne weakenesse and consider what we are like to doe in like case We nowe professe the Gospell of Christ yet if
stand before me Ierem. 15. 19. God reueales his secrets to the Prophets his seruants Amos 3. 7. Lastly fearefull iudgements of God belong to Ministers of wicked liues Destruction befalls the sonnes of Eli and their families because they by leud example made the people of God to sinne 1. Sam. 2. 24. The like befell the sonnes of Aaron for their presumption Againe all superiours are warned to goe before their inferiours by good example When Moses went into Egypt to be the guide of the Israelites the Lord would haue destroied him by reason of the bad example in his owne familie namely the vncircumcision of his child Dauid for his euill exāple whereby he caused the enemies of God to blaspheme is punished and that after his repentance that men might see in him an example of Gods iudgement against sinne 2. Sam. 12. 14. Here againe we see that the consent of many together is not a note of truth Peter Barnabas and the Iewes all together are deceiued and Paul alone hath the truth Panormitane saith that a laie-man bringing Scripture is to be preferred before a whole Councell Paphnutius alone had the truth and the whole Councell of Nice inclined to errour 14 But when I saw that they went not with a right foote to the truth of the Gospel I said to Peter before all men If thou beeing a Iew liuest as the Gentiles and not like the Iewes why constrainest thou the Gentiles to doe like the Iewes In these words Paul sets downe the reproofe of Peter and the whole manner of it In it many points are to be considered The first is the time of this reproofe and that was so soone as Paul saw the offence of Peter Here we learne that we must resist and cut off the first beginnings of temptation of sinne and of superstition because we are prone to cuill and therefore if it once set footing in vs it will take place The second point is the foundation of the reproofe in these wordes when I saw and that is a certen knowledge of Peters offence Here we are to take notice of the common fault and that is that we vse to censure and condemne men specially publike persons vpon suspitions and coniectures and heare-say Whereas we should not open our mouthes to reprooue till we haue certen knowledge of the fault Moreouer publike persons as Magistrates and Ministers haue their priuiledge that an accusation is not to be receiued against them without there be a proofe by two or three witnesses 1. Tim. 5. 20. The third point is the fault reprooued which is here expressed by an other name not to walke with a right foote to the truth of the Gospel that is not to conuerse with men and to carrie himselfe so as he may be sutable to the sinceritie of the Gospel both in word and deede Here is a notable dutie set downe for all men To walke with an euen foote according to the truth of the Gospel and this is done when in word and deede and euery way we ascribe all the good we haue or can doe to grace to mercie and to Christ when againe in word and deede and euery way we giue all thanks to God for grace and mercie by Christ. Here two sorts of men are to be condemned as haulters in respect of the truth of the Gospel The first are Papists who ioyne Christ and workes in the cause of our iustification and saluation The second are carnall Protestants and all other sorts of men that professe the name of Christ and withall challenge to themselues a libertie to liue as they list For they walke contrarie to the Gospel disioyning iustification and sanctification faith and good life remission of sinne and mortification This is the rife and common sinne of our daies We are light in the Lord but we walke not as children of light We are content to come to the marriage of the kings sonne but we come not with the marriage garment It is to be feared this very sinne will banish the Gospel and bring all the iudgements of God vpon vs. Let vs therefore repent of our vneuen and haulting liues and preuent the Lords anger by walking worthie the Gospel of Christ. It will besaid how must we performe this dutie Ans. Two rules must be remembred The first is that we must haue and carrie in vs a right heart For the want of this was Simon Magus condemned Act. 8. 21. A right heart is an humble and an honest heart The humble heart is when in the estimation of our owne hearts we abase our selues vnder all creatures vpon earth and that for our offences when againe in the affection of our hearts we exalt the death and blood of Christ aboue all riches aboue all honours aboue all pleasures aboue all ioyes and aboue all that heart can thinke or tongue can speake The honest heart is when we carrie and cherish in our hearts the setled purpose of not sinning so as if we sinne at any time we may in the testimonie of a good conscience say that we sinned against our purpose The second rule is that we must make straight steppes to our feete Hebr. 12. 13. And that is done when we endeauour to obey God according to all his commandements Psal. 119. 6. and also according to all the powers of the inward man that is not onely in action but also in will affection and thought Let vs also applie our hearts to the doing of this least if we come to the marriage of the kings sonne without the garment of a right heart and life we heare the sentence Binde them hand and foote and cast them into vtter darknes there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth The fourth point is the place of reproofe before all men for they that sinne openly to the offence of many are openly to be reprooued 1. Tim. 5. 20. The fifth point is concerning the reasons which Paul vseth for the restraining of the sinne of Peter The first is set downe in the 16. verse If thou beeing a Iew c. Here the meaning of some words are to be opened To Iudaise or to liue as a Iew is to obserue and that necessarily a difference of meates and times according to the ceremoniall law of Moses To Gentilize or to liue as a Gentile is to vse meats and drinks and times freely without difference Peter is said to compell the Gentiles to Iudaise not by teaching of any doctrine for the Apostles neuer erred in teaching and deliuering any thing to the church of God this is a principle therefore he constrained them by the authoritie of his example whereby he caused them to thinke that the obseruation of the Ceremoniall law was necessarie The first reason then is framed thus If thou beeing a Iew vsest to liue as the Gentiles thou maist not by thy example compell the Gentiles to Iudaize in the necessarie obseruation of ceremonies but thou beeing a Iew vsest to liue as the Gentiles
that when we know not what to doe by reason of the greatnes of our distresse we must then fixe our hearts on Christ without seperation He that climes vp a ladder or some steepe place the higher he goes the faster he holds 2. Chron. 20. 12. Iob. 13. 12. Hence is true comfort Psal. 27. 13. 17 And if while we seeke to be made righteous by Christ we our selues are found sinners is Christ the minister of sinne God forbid For the better vnderstanding of the latter part of this chapter it must be obserued that Paul directs his speach not onely to Peter but also to the Iewes that stood by beeing maintainers of iustification by the law Some thinke that in this verse Paul makes an obiection in the person of the false Apostles on this manner If we be iustified by Christ alone without the obseruation of the law then there is no difference betweene vs Iewes and the Gentiles but we are as deepe sinners as they and if this be so then Christ is the minister of sinne And then they say to this Paul answers God forbid But I somewhat doubt whether this be the sense of the words because Paul doth not make a direct confutation of this obiection in the words following Therefore I rather suppose that Paul continues his former speach euen to the ende of the chapter and that in these words he vseth a third reason to disswade Peter from haulting betweene the Iewes and Gentiles And the reason will the better appeare if we search the meaning of the words If while we be iustified by Christ that is by faith in Christ without the workes of the law We are found sinners that is found in our sinnes not fully iustified but are further to be iustified by the workes of the law Is Christ the Minister of sinne that is doth it not hence follow that Christ ministred vnto vs occasion of sinne in that he hath caused vs to renounce the iustice of the law God forbid that is ye doe all hold it with me as a blasphemie that Christ should be the minister of sinne The argument then is framed thus If beeing iustified by Christ we remaine sinners and are further to be iustified by the law then Christ is the minister of sinne but Christ is no minister of sinne therefore they which are iustified neede not further to be iustified by the law The vse First we learne hence that it is a blasphemie to make Christ the minister of sinne who is the minister of righteousnes yea iustice it selfe Isa. 53. 11. Dan. 9. 25. He brings euerlasting righteousnes Ioh. 1. He is the lambe of God that takes away the sinnes of the world Of this all the Prophets giue testimonie Act. 10. 43. Therefore Atheists are no better then deuills that recken him among the false Prophets of the world And many of them that professe Christ are greatly to be blamed that make Christ the greatest sinner in the world because Christ died for them therefore they prefume of mercie and take libertie to liue as they list Againe Paul here teacheth that they which are iustified by Christ are perfectly to be iustified and neede not further to be iustified by any thing out of Christ as by the workes of the law It may be obiected that they which are iustified feele themselues to be sinners Rom. 7. 14. Ans. The corruption of original sinne is in them that are iustified yet is it not imputed to them by God and withall it hath receiued his deadly wound by the death of Christ. Therefore they which are iustified are not reputed sinners before God Againe it may be obiected that they which are iustified must confesse themselues to be sinners to the very death Ans. Confession of sinne is not a cause but a way for the obtaining of pardon Prou. 28. 14. 1. Ioh. 1. 9. The vncouering of our sinnes is the way to couer them before God The sinnes therefore of men iustified vpon their humble and serious confession are not sinnes imputed but couered Vpon this doctrine it followes that there is not a second iustification by workes as the Papists teach For he that is iustified by Christ is fully iustified and neede not further be iustified by any thing out of Christ as by the law Againe the same persons teach that our sinnes are done away by the death of Christ and we iustified in our baptisme and that if we fall and sinne after baptisme we must doe workes of penance that we may satisfie Gods iustice and be further iustified by our works and sufferings But then by their leaues after we are iustified by Christ we are found sinners and we are further to be iustified by our owne workes Now this is the point which Paul here confuteth Againe by this doctrine we learne that Christ alone is by himselfe sufficient for our iustification In him saith Paul are we complete Col. 2. 14. He is a well of grace and life neuer dried vp Ioh. 4. 14. Thirdly we must content our selues with him alone and with his obedience for our iustification despising in respect of him all merits and satisfactions done by man Lastly here we see what must be the care of men in this world namely to seeke to be iustified by the faith of Christ. It was Pauls principall desire to be found in Christ hauing not his owne righteousnes but the righteousnes which is by the faith of Christ. Phil. 3. 10. The like desire should be in vs all 18 For if I build againe the things which I haue destroied I make my selfe a transgressour By things destroyed Paul meanes the workes or the iustice of the law as appeares by the next verse following where rendering a reason of this he saith by the law I am dead to the law These words depend on the former thus Paul had said before that Christ was not a minister of sinne vnto vs and here he prooues it thus He that builds the iustice of the law which he hath destroied is a minister of sinne or makes himselfe a sinner but the Iewes and Peter by his example build the iustice of the law which they haue destroied and so doth not Christ therefore the Iewes and Peter make themselues sinners and Christ doth not make vs sinners Here let vs obserue the modestie and meeknes of Paul The things which he speakes concerne Peter and the Iewes yet least he offend them he applies them to himselfe This care not to offend was in Christ who was rather willing to depart frō his right then to offend Matth. 17. 27. And Paul biddes vs please all men in that which is good Here againe it is Pauls doctrine that we make our selues offendours when we build that which we haue lawfully destroied Thus Teachers are great offenders when good doctrine is ioyned with bad conuersation For good doctrine destroies the kingdome of darknes and bad conuersation builds it vp againe Thus rulers are great offenders when good counsell and bad example
2. 6. This beeing so our dutie is to guard and inclose our selues specially our hearts Prov. 4. 23. and all the senses and powers of our soules Psal. 141. 3. by the wholesome precepts and counsells of God Considering we lie open to so many enemies we should continually be armed and fensed from the head to the foote Eph. 6. 13. otherwise we shall vpon euery occasion be ouerturned To come to the 24. v. the Iewes might happily say seeing we are thus kept and shut vp by the law what meanes haue we of comfort and of saluation The answer is made the law is further our schoolemaster Here by schoolemaster vnderstand one that teacheth little children or Petits the first rudiments or elements A. B. C. And the law is a schoolemaster to Christ for two causes One because it points out and shadowes forth vnto vs Christ by bodily rudiments of ceremonies and sacrifices The second is because the law specially the morall law vrgeth and compelleth men to goe to Christ. For it shewes vs our sinnes and that without remedie it shewes vs the damnation that is due vnto vs and by this meanes it makes vs dispaire of saluation in respect of our selues and thus it inforceth vs to seeke for helpe out of our selues in Christ. The law is then our schoolemaster not by plaine teaching but by stripes and correction In this verse Paul sets downe the manner and way of our saluation which is on this manner first the law prepares vs by humbling vs then comes the Gospel and it stirres vp faith And faith wrought in the heart apprehends Christ for iustification sanctification and glorification Paul sets this forth by a fit similitude They that would be the seruants and children of God must come into the schoole of God and be taught of him In this schoole are two formes and two masters In the first forme the teacher and master is the law And he teacheth men to know their sinnes and their deserued damnation and he causeth vs to despaire of our saluation in respect of our selues And when men haue bin well schooled by the law and are brought to acknowledge their sinnes and that they are slaues of sinne and Satan then must they be taken vp to an higher forme and be taught by an other schoolemaster which is Faith or the Gospel The lesson of the Gospel is that men after they are humbled must flie to the throne of grace beleeue in Christ and with all their hearts turne vnto God that they may be iustified and glorified When we haue by the teaching of this second master learned this good lesson we are become children and seruants of God By this then it is manifest that there are two sorts of badde schollers in the schoole of Christ among vs. One sort are they which come to the Lords table and yet learne nothing either from the law or from the Gospel but content themselues with the teaching of nature The second sort are they which learne something but in preposterous manner For they haue learned that mercie and saluation comes by Christ and with this they content themselues not suffering themselues first of all to be schooled by the law till they despaire in respect of themselues nor to be schooled of the Gospel till they beleeue in Christ and repent of their sinnes In a word he is a good scholler in the schoole of Christ that first learnes by the law to humble himselfe and to goe out of himselfe and beeing humbled subiects his heart to the voice and precept of the Gospel which biddes vs beleeue in Christ turne to God and testifie our faith by new obedience In the second part of the comparison 25. v. Paul sets downe one point that at the comming of the faith the Iewes were freeed from the dominion of the law of Moses and consequently that the said law was abrogated The lawgiuer that is the expounder of Moses law was to last but till the comming of Shilo Gen. 49. 10. The law of commandements standing in ordinances was abrogated by the flesh of Christ. Eph. 2. 15. And the change of the priesthood brought the change of the law Hebr. 7. 12. For the better cleering of this point three questions are to be demanded The first is when was the policie regiment or law of Moses abrogated Ans. At the comming of the faith or when the Gospel first beganne to be published to the world which was at the Ascension of Christ. And he in his death cancelled the ceremoniall law and tooke it out of the way Col. 2. 14. When the old Testament ended and the new began then was the abrogation of the law now the ending of the old Testament and the beginning of the new was in the Resurrection of Christ. For then was the beginning of the new world as it were The second question is How farre forth the law is abrogated Ans. The law is threefold Morall Ceremoniall Iudiciall Morall is the law of God concerning manners or duties to God and man Now the morall law is abrogated in respect of the Church and them that beleeue three waies First in respect of iustification and this Paul prooues at large in this epistle Secondly in respect of the malediction or curse There is no condemnation to them that are in Christ. Rom. 8. 1. Thirdly in respect of rigour For in them that are in Christ God accepts the indeauour to obay for obedience it selfe Neuerthelesse the law as it is the Rule of good life is vnchangeable and admits no abrogation And Christ in this regard did by his death establish it Rom. 3. 31. The Ceremoniall law is that which prescribed rites and gestures in the worship of God in the time of the old testament Ceremonies are either of figure and signification or of order The first are abrogated at the comming of Christ who was the accomplishment of them all Col. 2. 17. The second beeing ceremonies of particular order to the times of the old and new Testament concerne not vs. For example In the commandement of the Sabbath some things are morall some ceremoniall some iudiciall That in one day of seuen there should be an holy rest it is morall Rest vpon the seuenth day from the creation is Ceremoniall in respect of order Strictnes of rest from all labour is ceremoniall in respect of the signification of rest from sinne and rest in heauen Therefore the particular day of rest and the manner of rest is abrogated and Christ by his owne example and by the example of the Apostles examples not beeing contradicted in Scripture appointed the eight day or the day of Christs resurrection to be the Sabbath of the new Testament Iudiciall lawes are such as concerne inheritances lands bargaines controuersies causes criminall and they pertaine to the regiment of the Commonwealth If the Commonwealth of the Iewes were now standing they should be gouerned by these lawes For to them were they giuen The case is not like with vs. Some
our selues on Christ by faith Fourthly the law was written in tables of stone the Gospel in the fleshie tables of our heart Ier. 31. 33. 2. Cor. 3. 3. Fiftly the law was in nature by creation the Gospel is aboue nature and was reuealed after the fall Sixtly the law hath Moses for the mediatour Deut. 5. 27. but Christ is the mediatour of the new testament Heb. 8. 6. Lastly the law was dedicated by the blood of beasts Exod. 24. 5. the new Test by the blood of Christ. Heb. 9. 12. Here then falls to the ground a maine pillar in Popish religion which is that the law of Moses and the Gospel are all one law for substance and that the difference lies in this that the law of Moses is darke and imperfect and the Gospel or the law of Christ more perfect because he hath as they say added Counsells to precepts Againe the law they say without the spirit is the law properly and with the spirit it is the Gospel But all this is false which they teach For the two Testaments the law and the Gospel are two in nature substance or kind and the difference lies not in the presence or absence of the spirit And whereas the Papists make two iustifications the first meerely by grace the second by workes besides the two Testaments they must establish a third Testament compounded of both and it must be partly legall and partly Euangelicall otherwise the twofold iustification cannot stand For the law propounds onely one way of iustification and the Gospel a second The doctrine therefore that propounds both is compounded of both God did not approoue the polygamie of Abraham yet doth he vse it to signifie the greatest mysterie of our religion Here we see a great point of the diuine prouidence of God who ordereth and vseth well the things which he doth not approoue This is the foundation of our patience and a meanes of true comfort Ioseph thus comforts himselfe and his brethren that God ordered and disposed their bad enterprise to his and their good Gen. 45. 6 7. Here againe Paul sets downe two properties of the Testament of workes or of the law The first is that it came from mount Sina And here lies the difference betweene the law and the Gospel the law is from Sina the gospel from Sion or Ierusalem For there it was first to be preached and thence conueied to all nations Mich. 4. 1. Ezech. 47. 1. The second propertie of the law is that it gendreth to bondage because it maketh them bond men that looke to be saued and iustified thereby And this it doth by reuealing sinne and the punishment thereof which is euerlasting death and by conuincing all men of their sinnes and of their deserued condemnation In this respect it is called the ministerie of death 2. Cor. 3. 6. and Paul saith that after he knew his sins by the lawe he died and the lawe was the meanes of death vnto him Rom. 7. 10. Here is another difference between the law and the Gospel The lawe genders to bondage the Gospell genders to life For it is an instrument of the spirit for the beginning and confirming of our regeneration and saluation and so is not the law which is no cause but only an occasion of the grace of God in vs. Where as Ierusalem that now is is said to be in bondage as Sina and Hagar It is to be obserued that there is no Church in the world nor people which is not subiect to Apostasie For God had made great and large promises to Ierusalem Psal. 122. and 132. and yet for all this Ierusalem by refusing Christ and by establishing the iustice of the lawe is comne into bondage and depriues herselfe of the inheritance of eternall life Therefore it is a falshood which the Papists teach that the infallible assistance of the spirit is tyed to the Chaire and Consistorie of the Pope so as he and consequently the Church of Rome cannot erre Here againe we see what may be the future condition of England For it may be said of it hereafter England that now is is not that which it hath bin namely a maintainer of the Gospell of Christ. Therefore we must not be high minded but feare and now take heed of the first beginning of apostasie The holy Ghost Heb. 3. 12 13. set down the degrees thereof and they are fiue in number The first is the deceit of sinne the second is the hardening of the heart after men are deceiued by sinne the third is an euill heart which growes vpon hardnesse of heart the fourth is vnbeleefe whereby the word of God is called in question and the trueth thereof and after vnbeleefe followes a departure from God and Christ. That this may not be we must carefully avoid all the deceits of sinne as namely couetousnes ambition lust c. Againe as Agar figures the lawe so doth Ismael all iusticiaries that looke to be saued by the law Here then we see the condition of the world the greatest part whereof are Ismalites For the Turke and the Iewe looke at this day to be faued by their workes The Papist ascribes his conuersion not wholly to grace but partely to grace and partly to nature or the strength of mans will helped by grace And thus are they borne after the flesh as Ismael was And our common people though in shew they professe reformed religion yet indeed a great part of them are Ismaelites For they looke to be saued by their good seruing of God and by their good deeds and they little thinke on Christ and his merits And thus they depriue themselues of all title to eternall life Therefore it stands them in hand to condemne nature and the strength thereof and to renounce their owne workes and to rest onely on the promise of mercie for eternall saluation thus shall they be the children of the promise and heires of God Lastly in that Ierusalem is in bondage like Agar or mount Sina we see how vaine are the pilgrimages to the holy land how needlesse were the warres made for the recouery thereof 26. But Ierusalem which is aboue is free which is the mother of vs all Here Paul shewes what is figured by Sara namely the new Ierusalem which is the Catholike Church Heb. 12. 22 23. Reuel 21. 2. And it is here so tearmed because Ierusalem was a type thereof in sixe respects First God chose Ierusalem aboue all other places to dwell in Psal. 132. 13. And the Catholike Church is the companie of predestinate chosen to be a particular people to God Secondly Ierusalem is a citie compact in it selfe by reason of the bond of loue and order among the citizens Psal. 122. 3. In like sort the members of the Catholike Church are linked togither by the bond of one spirit Thirdly in Ierusalem was the sanctuarie a place of Gods presence and of his worship where also the promise of the seed of the woman was preserued
till the comming of the Messias and now the Catholike Church is in the roome of the sanctuarie in it must we seeke the presence of God and the word of life therefore it is called the pillar and ground of truth 1. Tim. 3. 15. Fourthly in Ierusalem was the throne of Dauid Psal. 122. 5. and in the Catholike Church is the throne or scepter of Christ figured by the kingdome of Dauid Reu. 3. 7. Fiftly the commendation of a cittie as Ierusalem is the subiection obedience of the citizens now in the Catholike Church all beleeuers are citizens Eph. 2. 19. and they yeild voluntarie obedience and subiection to Christ their king Psal. 110. 2. Isai 2. 5. Lastly as in Ierusalem the names of the citizens were inrolled in a register so the names of all the members of the Catholike Church are inrolled in the booke of life Reu. 20. 15. Hebr. 12. 23. Againe the Catholike Church dwelling here belowe is said to be aboue in heauen for two causes First in respect of her beginning which is from the Election and grace of God and from Christ the Mediatour of whose flesh and bone we are that beleeue Eph. 5. 30. The iustice whereby we are iustified is in Christ our holinesse and life flowes from the holinesse and life of Christ as from a roote Secondly the Church is said to be aboue because it dwels by faith in heauen with Christ for the propertie of faith is to make vs present after a sort when we are absent Heb. 11. 2. The vse This beeing so we are admonished to liue in this world as Pilgrimes and strangers 1. Pet. 2. 11. and therefore we must not set our loue vpon any earthly thing but our mindes must be vpon the countrie to which we are trauelling And whatsoeuer is an hinderance to vs in our iourney we must cast it from vs that we may goe lightly and if we haue any wrongs done vs either in goods or good name we must the rather be content because we are out of our countrie in a strange place and hereupon we must take occasion to make haste to our iourneys end that is to our own citie and last abode Thus did the Patriarches Heb. 11. 13 15. Secondly we must carrie our selues as Burgesses of heauen Phil. 3. 20. And this we shall do by minding seeking affecting of heauenly things by speaking the language of Canaan which is to inuocate and praise the name of God Lastly by leading a spirituall life that may beseeme the citizens of heauen Many faile in this point when they come to the Lords table they professe themselues to be citizens of the citie of God but in their common dealings in the world they play the starke rebels against God and his word and liue according to the lusts of their blinde and vnrepentant hearts Thirdly when Paul saith that Ierusalem which is aboue is free c. he shewes that the Catholike Church is one in number no more Cant. 6. 8. My doue is aboue and the onely daughter of her mother Ioh. 10. 16. One sheepefold There be many members but one bodie 1. Cor. 12. 12. Fourthly hence we gather that the Catholike Church is invisible For the companie of them that dwell in heauen by their faith cannot be discerned by the eie Iohn saw the heauenly Ierusalem descending from heauen yet not with the bodily eye but in spirit Reuel 21. 10. The things which make the Catholike Church to be the Church namely election vocation iustification glorification are inuisible The papist therfore erreth when he teacheth that the Catholike Church is a visible companie vnder one Pastour namely the Pope And the places which they bring to prooue the visibilitie of the vniuersall Church concerne either particular churches or the churches which were in the daies of the Apostles or againe they speake of the inward glorie and beautie of the Church Free that is redeemed from the bondage of death and sin and so from the curse of the lawe Of this freedome I will speak more afterward The mother of vs all shee is called a mother because the word of God is committed to the keeping of the Church which word is seed 1. Pet. 1. 23. and milke 1. Cor. 3. 2. and strong meat Heb. 5. 14. And the church as a mother which by the ministery of the said word brings forth children to God after they are borne brought forth shee feeds them with milke out of her owne breasts which are the Scriptures of the olde and newe Testament Here a great question is to be propounded namely where we shall find this our Mother For it is the dutie of all children to haue recourse vnto their mother and to liue vnder her wing The aduocates of the Popish Church Priests and Iesuits say we must be reconciled to the Church and See of Rome if we would be of the Catholike church To this purpose they vse many motiues I will here propound seauen of them because heretofore they haue bin scattered abroad among vs. The first motiue The Church of Rome hath meanes of sure and certen interpretation tradition councels fathers we haue nothing but the priuate interpretation of Luther Melancthon Caluin c. Answ. Scripture is both the glosse and the text And the principall meanes of the interpretation of scripture is scripture it selfe And it is a means when places of scripture are expounded by the Analogie of faith by the words scope and circumstances of the place And the interpretation which is sutable to all these is sure certen and publike for it is the interpretation of God Contrariwise the interpretation which is not agreeable to these though it be from Church Fathers and Councells is vncerten and it is priuate interpretation Now this kind of interpretation we allow and therefore it is false that we haue onely priuate interpretations and that all the interpretations of the Church of Rome are publike Secondly I answer that we are able to iustifie our Interpretations of Scripture for the maine points of religion by the consent of Fathers and Councells as well as they of the church of Rome The second motiue We haue no diuine and infallible authoritie to rest on in matter of religion but they of the church of Rome haue Ans. In the Canonicall scriptures of the Prophets and Apostles there is diuine and infallible authoritie for they are now in the new Testament in stead of the liuely voice of God And this authoritie we in our Church acknowledge Secondly I answer that the church hath no diuine and infallible authoritie distinct from the authoritie of scriptures as the Papists teach but onely a Ministerie which is to speake in the name of God according to the written word The third motiue We haue no limitations of opinion and affection but they of the church of Rome haue I answer first we suffer our selues to be limited for opinion by the Analogie of faith and by the written word and so doth
23. Ye are bought with a prise be not seruants of men that is let not your hearts and consciences stand in subiection to the will of any man Here then falls to the ground the Opinion of the Papists namely that the lawes and Traditions of the Church bind conscience as truly and certenly as the word of God This doctrine is not of God because it is against Christian libertie Obiect I. Rom. 13. 5. Be subiect to the higher powers for conscience Ans. Conscience here is not in respect of the lawes of the Magistrate but in respect of the law of God that binds vs in conscience to obay the law of the Magistrate Obiect II. Heb. 13. 17. Obay them that haue the ouersight of you and be subiect Ans. We must be subiect to them because as Ministers of God they deliuer the word of God in the name of God vnto vs and that word binds conscience Againe the lawes which they make touching order and comelines in the seruice of God are to be obaied for the auoiding of scandall and contempt Obiect III. A thing indifferent vpon the commandement of the Magistrate becomes necessarie Ans. It is true But it must be obserued that necessitie is twofold Externall internall And the law of the Magistrate makes a thing indifferent to be necessarie onely in respect of externall necessitie for the auoiding of the contempt of authoritie and for the auoiding of scandall Otherwise the thing in it selfe is not necessarie but remaines still indifferent and may be vsed or not vsed if contempt and scandall be auoided The Apostles made a law that the Gentiles should abstaine from strangled and blood and things offered to Idols Act. 15. 28. yet Paul saith afterward to the Corinthians All things are lawfull 1. Cor. 10. 23. and whatsoeuer is sold in the shambles eate and make no question for conscience sake v. 25. because their intent was not that the law should simply binde but onely in the case of offence and therefore where there was no offence to be seared they leaue all men to their libertie Againe here is an other comfort to all that beleeue in Christ that nothing can hurt them and that no euill can befall them Psal. 91. v. 10. nay all things shall in the ende turne to their good though in reason and sense they seeme hurtfull To beleeue this one thing is a ground of all true comfort The consideration of this benefit of Christian libertie teacheth three duties The first is from our hearts to imbrace loue and maintaine Christian religion because it is the meanes of this libertie The second is carefully to search the scriptures for they are as it were the Charter in which our liberties are contained Thirdly our Christian libertie puts vs in minde to become vnfained seruants of God in the duties of faith repentance newe obedience Rom. 6. 22. For this seruice is our libertie The second point is touching the Author of this libertie in these words wherewith Christ hath made vs free Christ then is the worker of this libertie Ioh. 8. 36. he dissolues the works of the deuill 1. Ioh. 3. 8. he binds the strong man and casts him out of his hold Matth. 12. 29. He procures this libertie by two meanes by his merit and by the efficacie of his spirit The merit of his death procures deliuerance from death and it purchaseth a right to life euerlasting The efficacie of his spirit assures vs of our adoption and withall abates by little and little the strength and power of sinne The vse Hence we learne the greatnes and grieuousnes of our spirituall bondage because there was none that could deliuer vs from it but Christ by his death and passion Hence therefore we are to take occasion to acknowledge and bewaile this our most miserable condition in our selues Secondly the prise that was paid for the procurement of our libertie namely the pretious blood of the immaculate lambe of God shewes that the libertie it selfe is a thing most pretious and excellent and so to be esteemed Thirdly for this libertie we are to giue all praise and thanks to God This did Paul at the remembrance of it Rom. 7. 25. 1. Cor. 15. 57. And not to be thankfull is an height of wickednesse The third point is concerning the persons to whome this libertie belongs and they are noted in these wordes Stand ye fast he hath made vs free Whereby Paul signifies himselfe and the Galatians that beleeued in Christ. Beleeuers then are the persons to whome this libertie belongs Ioh. 1. 12. 1. Tim. 4. 3. And true beleeuers are thus to be discerned They vse the ordinatiemeanes of grace and saluation the word sacraments in the vse of the meanes they exercise themselues in the spirituall exercises of inuocation and repentance and in these exercises they bewaile their vnbeleefe and striue by all meanes to beleeue in Christ. As for them that conceiue a perswasion of Gods mercie without the meanes of saluation and without the exercises of inuocation and repentance they are not true beleeuers but hypocrites When Paul saith Christ hath made vs free that is me Paul and you the Galatians he teacheth that euery beleeuer must by his faith applie vnto himselfe the benefit of Christian libertie But to doe this well is a matter of great difficultie The Papists in their writings report our doctrine to be this that a man must conceiue a perswasion that he is in the fauour of God the adopted child of God and that vpon this perswasion he hath the pardon of his sinnes and the benefit of Christian libertie But they abuse vs in this as in many other things For we teach that the Application of Christ and his benefits is to be made by certaine degrees The first is to vse the meanes of saluation the word praier sacraments the second is to consider and to grow to some feeling of our spirituall bondage the third is to will and desire to beleeue in Christ and to testifie this desire by asking seeking knocking the fourth is a certen perswasion or a certentie conceiued in minde of the mercie of God by meanes of the former desire according to the promise of God Aske and it shall be giuen vnto you The fifth is an experience of the goodnes of God after long vse of the meanes of saluation and then vpon this experience followes the full perswasion of mercie and forgiuenes The fourth point concernes the office of beleeuers and that is to stand fast in their Christian libertie and in the doctrine of the Gospel which reueales this libertie And by this we in England are admonished to stand fast to the religion which is now by law established amōg vs not to returne vnder the yoke of Popish bondage For the Popish religion is flat against Christian libertie two waies For our libertie which we haue in Christ frees vs from the law three waies in respect of condemnation in respect of compulsion to obedience and
in respect of iustification as Paul shewes at large in this Epistle and yet the Popish doctrine is that we are to be iustified by the workes of the law Againe Christian libertie frees our consciences from the Traditions of men Col. 2. 20. and yet the Popish religion bindes vs in conscience to the Traditions of men nay it is nothing els but an heape of traditions Here two things are to be considered the manner of standing and the time The manner is signified in the very words For to stand fast is to hold and maintaine our libertie with courage and constancie whatsoeuer comes of it as the soldier keepes his standing though it cost him his life We are readie to defend the libertie of our countrie euen with the hazard of our liues much more then are we to defend Christian libertie with the losse of all that we inioy sinne must be resisted euen vnto blood Hebr. 12. 4. If men be fearefull they must pray to God for the spirit of boldnes and courage and if God vouchsafe not this gift when opportunitie is offered they may withdraw themselues and by flying preserue their libertie The time of standing is the euill day that is the day of triall Eph. 6. 13. And then to stand fast is a matter of great difficultie And for this cause we are before hand to prepare our selues by obseruing these rules following First we must labour that religion be not onely in mind and memorie but also be rooted in the affection of our hearts so as we loue it reioyce in it and esteeme it aboue all things Secondly we must not onely be hearers of the word of God but also doers of it in the exercises of faith repentance new obedience Thirdly we must ioyne with our religion the soundnes of good conscience for if conscience faile we cannot be sound in our religion Lastly we must pray to God with all manner of praier and supplication for all things needefull Eph. 6. 18. 2 Behold I Paul say vnto you that if ye be circumcised Christ shal profit you nothing These words are a reason of the former conclusion thus If ye be circumcised and goe backe from your Christian profession Christ shall profit you nothing therefore stand fast In the words I consider a sentence and the proofe of it The sentence If ye be circumcised c. the proofe J Paul say vnto you For the better vnderstanding of the sentence Circumcision must here be considered according to the circumstance of time three waies Before Christ it was a sacrament and a seale of the righteousnesse of faith Rom. 4. 11. after the death of Christ till the destruction of the temple it was a dead ceremonie yet sometime vsed as a thing indifferent After the destruction of the Temple when the Church of the new Testament was planted among the Gentiles it was a deadly ceremonie and ceased to be indifferent and in this last respect Paul saith If ye be circumcised c. Againe circumcision must be considered according to the opinion which the false Apostles had of it now they put their confidence in it and made it a meritorious cause of their saluation and ioyned it with Christ. The words therefore carrie this sense If ye will be circumcised with this opinion that circumcision shall be vnto you a meritorious cause of your saluation Christ shall profit you nothing The vse Hence it followes that the doctrine of iustification by works is an errour ouerturning the foundation of religion which whosoeuer obstinately maintaineth cannot be saued It will be said this is true of ceremoniall works but not of morall works Ans. Yea euen of morall For that which Paul saith here of circumcision he speakes generally of the whole law vers 4. Ye are abolished from Christ whosoeuer are iustified by the law And circumcision must be considered as an obligation to the obedience of the whole law Againe it may be said this is true of the works of nature but not of works of grace Ans. Yea euen of workes of grace for the Galatians were regenerate and therfore looked not to be iustified saued by the workes of nature but by workes of grace Secondly hence we gather that to adde any thing to the passion as a meritorious cause of our iustification and saluation is to make Christ vnprofitable For he must be a perfect Sauiour or no Sauiour he admits neither partner nor deputie in the worke of our redemption And the grace of God admits no mixture or composition with any thing that is of vs. Grace is no grace vnlesse it be freely giuen euery way Therefore the Popish religiō is a damnable religion because with the merit satisfactiō of Christ it ioyns humane merits satisfactions in the case of our iustification It may be alleadged that the Popish religion maintaines all the articles concerning Christ as we doe Ans. It doth so in word but withall it addes to the foresaid articles the doctrine of humane merits and satisfactions which make voide the death of Christ. Againe Papists alleadge that it is the glorie of Christ that he merits for vs and withall makes vs to merit for our selues as it is the glorie of an Emperour to make other kings vnder him Ans. It is not the glorie of the Emperour to make kings as partners with him in his kingdome And workes set vp as meritorious causes of saluation dishonour Christ for they make him vnprofitable as Paul here teacheth Popish religion therefore is in no wise in any place to be tollerated where it may be abolished but it is to be wished that it were banished forth of towne and countrey and students are to be warned with great circumspection to read Popish writers For no good can be looked for of that religion that makes Christ vnprofitable Lastly we are here taught to content our selues with Christ alone and with his works merits and satisfactions For in him we are complete Col. 2. 10. The confirmation of the sentence followeth I Paul say it therfore it is so This kind of reasoning may not seeme strange for the Apostles in writing and preaching had the diuine and infallible assistance of the spirit so as they could not erre This must be held as a Principle in religion and beeing denied there is no certentie of the Bible 3 For I testifie againe to euery man that is circumcised that he is bound to keepe the whole law 4 Ye are abolished from Christ whosoeuer are iustified by the law ye are fallen from grace The meaning Paul saith I testifie againe because he hath spoken thus much in effect before Gal. 3. 10. That is circumcised who is of opinion of the false Apostles that will be circumcised and looke for iustification thereby Bound to the whole law that is to the whole ceremoniall law to the iudiciall law and to the whole morall law And further bound in respect of iustification and life to doe all things in the law For he that
when I would doe good that euill is present with me Rom 7. 21. In my minde I serue the lawe of God in my bodie the lawe of sinne v. 25. And the Prophet saith that all our righteousnesse is as a menstruous cloath Isay 64. 4. Therefore euery good worke is stained with sinne Thus much shall suffice to shewe that it is impossible for any man in the time of this life to fulfill the lawe The reasons alleadged to the contrary are sufficiently answered before Pag. 188. c. To which place I referre the reader It may further be said if we cannot perfectly fulfill the law why doth Paul command vs to beare one anothers burdens and so to fulfill the law of Christ Answ. The lawe is said to be fulfilled three waies First by personall obedience and thus Christ onely fulfilled it Secondly by imputed obedience thus the regenerate fulfill it in Christ he beeing their righteousnes 1. Cor. 1. 30. and they complete in him Coloss. 2. 10. Thirdly by inchoate obedience thus Zacharie Elizabeth are said to haue walked in all the commandements of the Lord without reproofe Luk. 1. 6. And thus all the faithfull fulfill the lawe in labouring to obey God in all his commandements according to the measure of grace receiued and thus we are said to fulfill the lawe in this place God accepting the will for the deed We are further to consider that fulfilling of the lawe is sometime opposed to the transgression of the law as Iam. 2. 10. in which sense no man euer did or can fulfill it except Christ God and man who for this cause is said to be the end of the lawe for righteousnesse to euery one that beleeueth Rom. 10. 4. Sometime it is opposed to hypocrisie and dissimulation as 1. Ioh. 2. 4 5. and thus all the Saints fulfill it in that they indeauour to mortifie their corruptions and in all things to approoue their hearts and liues to God in keeping faith a good conscience In which sense Paul here biddeth vs to fulfill the lawe of Christ in performing duties of loue and bearing one anothers burdens It will be said if the lawe can no otherwise be fulfilled then by inchoate obedience to what ende serueth it Answ. It hath a threefold vse euen since the fall First it serues to restraine the outward man by keeping men in order through feare of punishment of which vse Paul speeketh when he saith that the lawe is not giuen to a righteous man but to the lawlesse and disobedient c. 1. Tim. 1. 9. Secondly to arrouse the drousie conscience and this it doeth many waies 1. By reuealing sinne for by the lawe commeth the knowledge of sinne Rom. 3. 20. 2. By reuealing the wrath and anger of God for sinne for the lawe causeth wrath Rom. 4. 15. 3. By conuicting the conscience of sinne When the commandement came sinne reuiued Rom. 7. 9. 4. By arraigning and condemning vs for sin for the lawe is the minister of death 2. Cor. 3. 7. and so putting vs out of all heart in our selues it causeth vs to flie to the throne of grace and so is our schoolemaster to bring vs to Christ. Gal. 3. 24. Thirdly it serues as a rule of good life Dauid saith that the word of God specially the law is a lanterne to his feete and a light to his paths Psal. 119. 105. So that though a regenerate man be not vnder the lawe in regard of iustification or accusation or coaction or condemnation yet he is vnder it in regard of direction and instruction for it shewes what is good what is euill what we ought to doe what to leaue vndone Lastly whereas Paul saith Beare ye one anothers burdens and so fulfill the lawe of Christ the word S O hath great Emphasis for it implies the manner how the Galatians and all men are to fulfill the lawe not by obseruing circumcision daies or times moneths or yeares as the false Apostles taught but by bearing forbearing and tollerating the infirmities of their brethren It may not vnfitly be applyed to the religious orders of Franciscans Dominicans Carthusians c. Let them not thinke that they keepe the lawe by abstaining from flesh by whipping themselues by single life counterfeit fasts voluntary pouertie regular obedience c. But let them comfort the afflicted releiue the distressed beare with the weake support one another in loue and S O they shall fulfill the law of Christ. v. 3. For if any man seeme to himselfe that he is somewhat when he is nothing he deceiueth himselfe in his imagination In this verse the Apostle remooues an impediment which hindereth most from performing the former dutie of bearing other mens burdens and that is a vaine conceit and imagination they haue of their owne excellencie farre aboue their brethren in thinking themselues too good to doe any dutie or service vnto them to be their packehorses to beare their burdens This vaine imagination and swelling conceipt which puffeth vp the most the Apostle laboureth to purge in this place when he saith He that seemeth to himselfe c. where by the way we may obserue the method of the Apostle first to giue rules of direction after to remooue impediments which may hinder our obedience 2. We see here the force of the word which searcheth the secrets of the heart Ebr. 4. 12. in that it casteth downe the imaginations and euery high thing that is exalted against the knowledge of God and bringeth into captiuitie euery thought to the obedience of Christ 2. Cor. 10. 4. In the words we may obserue these foure things 1. That men are nothing of themselues 2. That thought they be nothing yet they seeme to themselues to be somewhat and that of themselues 3. That in so doing they deceiue themselues 4. The remedies against the ouerweening of our selues For the first it may be demanded howe it can be truely said that men are of themselues meere nothing Is he nothing that is created after the image of God in holinesse and righteousnes Are Princes and Potentates nothing that are called Gods in scripture Are they nothing that Prophecie and worke miracles Answ. Paul speaketh not of the gifts of God bestowed vpon men but of the men themselues and of them not as they were in the state of innocencie before the fall but as they are nowe in the state of corruption Apostasie or in the state of grace as they are considered of in and by themselues Thus euen spirituall men are nothing of themselues for of them especially the Apostle speaketh as it may appeare out of the first verse For first all are by nature the children of wrath and firebrands of hell 2. the gifts of God bestowed vpon vs whether of nature or of grace are not ours but Gods the giuer of them Therefore no man may arrogate more vnto himselfe then another in regard of them seeing all of vs are but stewards and the things we haue are but
will be said howe can a man reape that which he soweth seeing that Christ affirmeth it to be a true saying that one soweth and another reapeth Ioh. 4. 37. Ans. In that one soweth and another reapeth it is not to bee imputed to nature but to the speciall prouidence of god the words are to be vnderstood of the prophets who were the seedsmen in sowing the seedes of the Gospel of the Apostles who were the reapers whose plaine and powerfull preaching of the Gospel did as farre exceede that of the prophets as the haruest doth the seed time Thus the time vnder the Law is resembled to childhood and infancie that vnder the Gospell to mans estate Gal. 4. 1. c. Againe it may be said the husbandman soweth not the body that shall be 1. Cor. 15. 37. Therefore he reapeth not that which he sowed Ans. He reapeth not the same indiuiduall but yet the same specificall bodie It may further be doubted of the trueth of that which is signified by this prouerbiall sentence namely whether euery man shal receiue according to his workes for so euery man should be condemned To which I answer that it is not vniuersally true for if the righteous commit iniquitie all his righteousnesse shall be no more remembred and if a wicked man turne from his sinne none of his sinnes that he hath committed shall be mentioned vnto him Ezeck 33. 13 16. It must therefore be restrained thus He that doeth wickedly and perseuereth therein to the ende He that doeth well and continueth in well doing shall receiue according to his workes the seedes of his former sinnes shall not growe vp to the haruest of condemnation For it is the priuiledge yea the happinesse of a righteous man so to haue his finnes couered with the robes of Christ his righteousnesse as that they shall neuer be vncouered to his shame Psal. 32. Esay 43. 25. Againe it may hence be prooued in that sanctification in death is perfected originall corruption beeing vtterly abolished and therefore though the booke of a regenerate mans conscience be opened at the day of iudgement yet nothing shall be found in it but his good workes which follow him till the resurrection Apoc. 14. 13. Besides this in the last sentence pronounced by our Sauiour Christ Math. 25. only their good workes are mentioned Come ye blessed of my father inherit the kingdome prepared for you for I was hungrie and ye fedde me c. their sinnes and imperfections not so much as once named but concealed and passed ouer II. Obiect It may be said that neither the good nor the bad doe reape that which they haue sowne the godly for the seeds of good works reape nothing but affliction the wicked for the cursed seeds of a damnable life comfort and contentation To which I answer that it is not true if we restraine it to the tearme of this life for so all men reape not as they haue sowne But it is vndoubtedly true of the life to come for the iustice of God requires that all should be rewarded according to their workes Rom. 2. Hence therefore we may gather that seeing men must reape as they sow and yet doe not reape nor receiue their reward in this life that there is another life after this in which God will giue to euery one as his workes shall be and therfore there shall be a iudgement And because the bodie was partaker with the soule either in doing good or euill it is iust likewise it should be partaker either of miserie or felicitie and therefore there shall be a resurrection III. Obiect The whore of Babylon must be rewarded double Apoc. 18. 6. In the cuppe that shee hath filled to you fill her the donble And the Saints pray thus to God Render to our neighbours seuenfold into their bosome Psal. 79. 12. Therefore it seemeth that some men shall not be iudged according to their works because they are punished aboue their deserts Ans Shee is rewarded double yet not aboue but according to her deserts giue her double according to her workes v. 6. the meaning is not that shee should be punished twise as much as shee had deserued for it is the law of God that the malefactour should be beaten with a certaine number of stripes not aboue but according to his trespasse Deut. 29. 2. but that shee should be tormented twise as much as shee had tormented others Againe these phrases and formes of speech of rewarding double or seuen fold signifie that God will pay wicked men whome to the full a definite number beeing put for an indefinite as Gen. 4. 15. Doubtlesse whosoeuer slaieth Cain shall be punished seuen fold The meaning is not that the murtherer of Cain should be punished seuen fold more then he was punished for killing his brother Abel for it should not haue beene so great a sinne for a man to haue killed him as it was for him to kill his brother but that he should be most seuerely and grieuously punished IIII. Obiect Infants haue no works whereby they may be iudged seeing they doe neither good nor euill as the Scripture speaketh of Iacob and Esau Rom. 9. 11. therefore all shall not be iudged according to workes Ans. These phrases of Scripture As a man sowes so shall be reape euery one shall receiue according to his workes c. are not to be extended to all but must be restrained to such as haue works knowledge to discerne betwixt good and euill which infants haue not For besides that they are destitute of workes they also want the vse of reason and therefore they shall not be iudged by the booke of conscience but by the booke of life For to say as Hugo de S. Vict. doth vpon the Rom. quaest 59. that they shall be condemned for the sinnes which their parents committed in their conception and natiuitie as though they themselues had actually committed them is contrarie to that Ezek. 18. 20. the sonne shall not beare the iniquitie of the father U. Obiect But how shall they be pronounced iust who beeing come to yeares of discretion yet haue no good works as Lazarus and the theefe vpon the crosse who liuing leudly all his life long was converted at the last gaspe Ans. That Lazarus had no good works whereby he might be declared iust it cannot be prooued the contrarie rather may be gathered out of Scripture and that the good theefe had no good works it is flit against the text Luk. 23. 40 41. where he maketh a notable confession of Christ and rebuketh his fellow labouring to bring him to the faith which was a memorable fact of Christian charitie Secondly though it were graunted that they had no good works in action yet they were full of good workes in affection and by these they were to be iudged God accepting in his children the will for the deede Lazarus by reason of his extreame pouertie and the theefe by reason of the shortnes of time which
Th. 2. 2. he had besought them they would not be troubled by spirit nor by word nor by letter as though it came from him And here he shews how they may know whether the Epistle be his or not if it haue this signe it is mine els it is counterfait for this note or marke is to be found in all and euery one of my Epistles Now these words which is a Signe in euery Epistle cannot be meant as some are of opinion of the former words onely viz. The salutation of me Paul with mine owne hand First because he saith it is a signe in euery Epistle whereas it is onely to be found 1. Corinth 16. 21. Galat. 6. 11. Coloss. 4. 18. 2. Thess. 3. 17. Philem. v. 19. and not in any other of his Epistles Secondly the words so I write should be false if they be referred onely to the former wordes because that manner of salutation is not to be found in euery Epistle as I haue alreadie shewed And except they be referred to the words following the grace of our Lord Iesus Christ c. they haue either none or a very hard construction Thirdly if Pauls salutation which he affirmeth to be a certaine note of his Epistle be vnderstood of these words The grace of our Lord Iesus Christ c. it agreeth vnto all as Anselme confesseth whereas beeing meant of the former words onely it doeth not agree to all but to a fewe and yet Paul makes it a generall infallible note and signe of euery Epistle Besides Ambrose and Primasius in their commentaries vpon the place as also the Author of the Commentaries which goeth vnder Ieroms name affirme the signe whereby we may know Pauls Epistles from counterfeit and forged Epistles to consist in these words the grace of our Lord c Chrysost. and Theodoret likewise say that Paul calleth the salutation a benediction or blessing which is in the end of the Epistle and a little after Hence we learne that he was accustomed to write these words The grace c. instead of adiewe or farewell vnto thē And Haimo long after expounds these words so I write howe saith he euen thus as it followeth The grace of our Lord c. I graunt it is probable that Paul writ his owne name in the ende of euery Epistle whether in the Greeke tongue and in the Hebrewe characters as Haimo affirmeth I leaue it as vncertaine and that by the salutation or signe of his Epistle his name written with his owne hand is in part to be vnderstood yet it is not onely nor principally meant The certen signe therefore of his Epistles is beside the subscription of his owne name the farewell that he giues them in these words The grace of our Lord Iesus Christ be with you all or the like to the same effect I say to the same effect because these very formall wordes are not to be found in euery of Pauls Epistles Therefore Caietan is far wide who taketh the entire and formall salutation as it is literally set downe 2. Thess. 3. 17. to be a note that the Epistle is his so that if it want any one word either the Epistle is not Pauls or there is some defect in the text for hereupon he concludes that the Epistle to the Coloss. onely hath something wanting in the farewell or salutation because it is said Grace be with you and not the grace of our Lord Iesus Christ be with you as it is in all his other Epistles But first it is an vntrueth for they are not onely wanting in the Epistle to the Colossians but also in the 1. to Timothie and in that to Titus where it is only said Grace be with thee Grace be with you all Secondly it is a flat mistaking of the text for Pauls meaning was not in euery Epistle to tie himselfe precisely to so many words and syllables but to commend them to the grace of Christ sometime making expresse mention of Christ sometime concealing his name yet so as that it is alway vnderstood though not expressed 12. As many as make a faire shew in the flesh compell you to be circumcised only because they would not suffer persecution for the crosse of Christ. From hence to the ende is laid down the second part of the conclusion which I call a Recapitulation wherein the Apostle doeth very artificially as Orators are accustomed repeat those things which he would haue specially to be remembred the maine points handled in the Epistle First that neither circumcision is necessarie to iustification nor the ceremoniall lawe to saluation Secondly that the false Apostles vrging the obseruation of the lawe as a thing necessarie to saluation sought not herein Gods glorie or the edification of their hearers but their owne ease and freedome from the crosse and persecution Thirdly that Christ crucified is the onely thing that iustifies a sinner without the workes of the Lawe Fourthly that true religion standeth not in outward things but in the renouation of the inward man In this verse and the next following Paul describes the false Apostles by fiue properties three whereof are laid downe in this verse The first is that they make a faire shewe The second that they compell men to the obseruing of their deuised religion The third the ende and scope they aime at that they may alway be in the sunne-shine liuing at ease and hauing the world at will onely because they would not suffer persecution for the crosse of Christ. First the Apostle saith that they make a faire shew in the flesh which is taken diuersly for it signifieth sundrie things First to make an outward glorious shew according to the flesh as that they were true Israelites of the seed of Abraham c. Of which boasting Paul speakes 2. Cor. 11. 18. Seeing that many glorie after the flesh I will glorie also They are Israelites so am I they are the seed of Abraham so am I. Secondly to please the Israelites which are after the flesh and to approoue themselues vnto them which held the keeping of the ceremoniall lawe Thirdly to vaunt themselues to the Iewes and them of the circumcision of the Galatians whome they had circumcised in the flesh as beeing made proselytes and wenne to their profession by their meanes Lastly to pretend great zeale and religion in outward obseruing of the lawe standing in carnall rites and bodily exercises as circumcision meates purification and the like which carnall rites the Apostle opposeth to spirituall worship Rom. 12. 1. and to the newe creature v. 16. of this chap. and bodely exercise which profiteth little to true pietie and the sincere practise thereof which is profitable for all things 1. Tim. 4. 8. The words may be taken in all these acceptions though princspally in the last Here we haue a notable propertie of false teachers which is to set a faire face vpon the matter to carrie all before them with a smooth countenance and in outward
to suffer persecution for the profession of it nor lay downe their liues in the maintenance thereof Matth. 13. 21. As soone as tribulation or persecution commeth by and by they are offended Whereas we ought to haue the same minde that Paul had who knowing that bonds and imprisonment aboad him yet passed not for them neither was his life deare vnto him Act. 20. 23. and was not onely readie to be bound but to die also for the name of the Lord Iesus Act. 21. 13. The reasons which should make vs willing to take vp our crosse and follow Christ are these First it is a great mercy and fauour of God that we are accounted worthy to suffer any thing for his sake Act. 5. 41. The Apostles departed from the counsell reioycing that they were accounted worthy to suffer rebuke for his name Secondly it is a meanes by the mercifull promise of God to procure and obtaine the blessings of this life Mar. 10. 30. Thirdly it hath blessednes annexed to it with a promise of assistance and helpe of Gods spirit 1. Pet. 4. 11. If ye berailed on for the name of Christ blessed are ye for the spirit of glorie and of God resteth vpon you which on their part is euill spoken of but on your part is glorified Lastly the ende of the crosse is glorie vnspeakable If we suffer with him we shall also be glorified with him Rom. 8. 17. Further whereas Saint Paul linketh together persecution and the preaching of the crosse we may see that the profession of the Gospel and persecution doe either goe hand in hand or doe follow one another inseperably for as many as will liue godly in Christ Iesus must suffer persecution 2. Tim. 3. 12. Moses is said to haue chosen rather to suffer affliction with the people of God then to enioy the pleasures of sinne for a season Heb. 11. 25. Where we see that affliction is the lette and portion of the godly The reason hereof is two-fold The malice of the Deuil who is alway nibbling at the heele Gen. 3. 15. And the hatred of the malignant Church the deuils seede euer maligning the Church and people of God The deuill maketh warre with the remnant of the womans seede which keepe the commandement of God and haue the testimonie of Iesus Apoc. 12. 17. The malignant Church persecuteth the Church of God as we may see in their types namely in Caine hating and persecuting Abel Ismael Isaac Esau Iacob Which they did onely because they saw their owne workes to be euill and theirs to be good 1. Ioh. 3. 12. And if it be demaunded why those that preach the word plainely and powerfully to the consciences of men in euidence of the spirit are so extreamely hated and maligned Ans. It is for no other thing but euen for the workes sake for which they ought to be reuerenced 1. Thess. 5. 13. and because they prophecie not good vnto them but euill 1. King 22. 8. that is preach not pleasing things by sowing pillowes vnder their elbowes and lulling them asleepe in the bedde of securitie but denounce the iudgements of God against them and so disquiet and trouble their guiltie consciences And what I beseech you is the reason why those that make conscience of sinne are so maligned of the wicked world and branded with the blacke names of Puritans and Precisians but this which our Sauiour Christ giueth Ioh. 15. 19. Because they are not of the world therefore the world hateth them Now all this commeth to passe by reason of that enmitie which God hath put betwixt the woman and the serpent his seede and her seede Gen. 3. 15. This teacheth vs first that we should suspect our selues that our hearts are not found nor our practise sincere when all men speake well of vs for true profession is alwaies accompanied with persecution Woe be to you when all men speake well of you Luk. 6. 26. Secondly that we must not be discouraged in our profession though there be neuer so many that make opposition or so mightie that raise persecution against vs. Though they tell vs as they did Paul Act. 28. 22. Concerning this sect we know that euery where it is spoken against or take vs vp with Nicodemus Ioh. 7. 52. Art thou also of Galile search and looke for out of Galile ariseth no Prophet In these blasts and stormes of temptatiōs we ought to make that saying of Christ our anker hold Blessed is he that is not offended in me Mat. 11. 6. Lastly that we thinke it not strange when we finde affliction or meete with persecution 1. Pet. 4. 12 13. 13 For they which are circumcised keepe not the Law but desire to haue you circumcised that they might glorie in your flesh Here the Apostle preuenteth and obiection which might be made against his former conclusion v. 12. For it might be said Paul did them wrong in standering them to vrge circumcision onely because they would auoid persecution when as they did it as zealous obseruers of the Law To this he answereth negatiuely that whatsoeuer they did pretend they intended no such thing And he prooueth his former assertion by two arguments and withall describeth the false Apostles by two other properties His first reason may be framed thus If they did vrge circumcision as beeing zealous of the Law and hauing conscience of the obseruing thereof they would keepe it themselues as well as compell others to the keeping of it But they keepe it not themselues Therefore they vrge it not in conscience to haue it obeied but for some sinister ende The second reason is this They that propound no other end to themselues in vrging of circumcision but vaunting and boasting in the flesh they seeke not the obseruation of the Law But these seducers vrge circumcision and other ceremonies that they might glorie in the flesh Therefore they seeke not the obseruation of the law So that here we haue two other properties of false teachers The first is to compell men to the obseruing of that which they will not obserue themselues For thus these seducers vrged the ceremoniall law Resembling herein the Scribes and Pharisies who bound heauie burdens and grieuous to be borne and laid them on mens shoulders whereas they themselues would not mooue them with one of their fingers Matth. 23. 4. The Popes and Prelates of the Romish Church are notorious in this kind in vrging men to make conscience of that which they themselues will not keepe to practise that which they will not performe and to beleeue that which they count false and fabulous For first they strictly require regular obedience to be performed of their nouices and others to their generals or gouernours specially to the Vicar of Christ and See of Rome whereas they will not be subiect to the higher powers as they ought Rom. 13. 1. nor obedient to gouernours as it is required 1. Pet. 2. 13 14. Nay their practise is notorious in these foure particulars
that is to binde them to a necessarie obseruation of the ceremoniall lawe Here let vs marke the practise and pollicie of the deuill Libertie from sinne death and the ceremoniall lawe is the treasure of the Church and therefore the deuill seekes to ouerthrow it by holding men in bondage vnder abolished ceremonies Thus at this day they of the popish Church are in bondage vnder an heape of humane traditions beeing indeede a yoake farre heauier then that of the ceremoniall-lawe Againe when men professe the name of Christ the deuill is content with it and he indeauours with all his might euery where to hold them vnder the bondage of sinne and to hold them in his snare at his will Thus vnder the name of Christianitie there be swarmes of Atheists Epicures Libertines worldlings and prophane persons At this time according to auncient custome we celebrate the memoriall of the birth of Christ and yet no time so full of disorder as this For the most that professe Christ take and challenge to themselues a licentious libertie to liue and doe as they list and this kind of libertie is flat bondage But they that are seruants of Christ indeed should take heede of this bondag◠For beeing free from sinne they should be seruants of nothing but righteousnesse Rom. 6. 18. They that be of a corporation stand for their liberties what a shame then is it that men should loue bondage and neglect the spirituall libertie which they haue by Christ. Thus we see howe the false brethren vrged circumcision now let vs come to Pauls refusall The first point is that they would not giue place for an houre It seemes they were requested to vse circumcision but once but they would not yeeld so much as once because their acte would haue tended to the preiudice of Christian liberty in all places Here we learne that we may not vse the least ceremonie that is in the case of confession before our aduersaries that is when they seeke to oppresse the trueth by face or by fraud and make ceremonies signes and tokens of the confession of any vntrueth Iulian the Emperour sitting in a chaire of estate gaue gold to his souldiers one by one withal cōmāding to cast of frākincense so much as a graine into the fire that lay vpon an heathenish altar before him Nowe Christ in souldiers refuse to do it and they which had not refused afterward recalled their acte and willingly suffered death Againe here we learne that we are not to yeeld from the least part of the trueth of the Gospel that God hath reuealed to vs. This truth is more pretious then the whole world beside and heauen and earth shall rather passe then the least tittle of it shall not be accomplished The commission of the Apostles was to teach them to doe all things which God had commanded Therefore the vnion or mixture of our religion with the popish religion is but a dreame of vnwise Politickes for in this mixture we must yeeld and they must yeeld something but we may not yeeld a iot of the truth reuealed to vs. There is no fellowship of light with darkenesse 1. Cor. 6. Colacinthus a naughtie pot hearbe marred a whole pot of pottage 2. King 4. 40. Christ saith in the like case of the Pharisies Let them alone they are the blinde leaders of the blind Math. 15. 14. We may yeeld in things indifferent but not in points of religion In matters of this world we may be indifferent and of neither side but in matters of God we may not There is no halting betweene two religions The second point is they gaue not place by way of subiection The reason is the Apostles were of highest authoritie simply to be beleeued in their doctrine And they had extraordinarie authoritie to punish them that rebelliously withstood them Act. 5. 5. 10. Act. 13. 20. 2. Cor. 10. 6. For this cause they were not to stand subiect to the iudgement and censure of any man They willingly suffered their doctrine to be tried yet were they not bound to subiection as other ministers of the new testament are 1. Cor. 14. 32. 1. Ioh. 4. 1. It may be said if they would not giue place by subiection howe then gaue they place Answer There is two kinds of yeelding one by tolleration without approbation the other by subiection which is the greatest approbation that can be By the first it may be Paul was content to giue place but not by the second Here we see howe we are to yeeld to the corruptions of the times in which we liue whether they be in manners or in doctrine We are to giue place by meeke and patient bearing of that which we cannot mende but we are not to giue place by subiection The third point is the ende of Pauls refusall That the truth of the Gospell might continue that is that the Gospel might be preserued in puritie and integritie in all things And by this Paul giues vs to vnderstand that if circumcision be made a necessarie cause of iustification and saluation the truth of the Gospel doeth not continue Here let vs obserue that when iustification or saluation is ascribed to workes or Sacraments the truth of the Gospell giues place and falshood comes in the roome Wherefore the religion of the Church of Rome is a meere deprauation of the Gospel for it makes workes to be the meritorious causes of iustification saluation Nay which is more it teacheth men to worship a peece of bread and to invocate dead men and to kneele downe to stockes and stones 6 And of them that seemed to be great what they were in times past it makes no matter to me God accepteth no mans person for they that are the cheife did not communicate any thing to me Here Paul laies downe the second signe of his approbation namely that in conference he learned nothing of the cheife Apostles And this he expresseth in the first words in which the concealement which he vseth is to be obserued For hauing begun a sentence he breakes it off in the middle and conceales the latter part and leaues it to be supplied by the reader thus Of them that seemed to be great I was not taught or I learned nothing The like forme of speaking is vsed 1. Chron. 4. 10. Where Iabez saith If the Lord blesse me and be with me concealing the end of his sentence I will be thankefull thus and thus In the roome of this concealement Paul puts an answer to an obiection For some man might take exception against his former speech thus Thou callest the Apostles Great but thou speakest fainedly for thou knowest they were but poore fishermen To this he makes answer thus What they were once it makes no matter to me Then he renders a reason of his answer God accepts no mans person This done he proceeds and renders a reason of his first speech he learned nothing of the cheefe Apostles because they did