will when a man disposeth of his goods how they shall be ordered after his death The Grecians doe properly and peculiarly call it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 According to the vse of Scripture it is vnderstood to be a couenant or agreement betwixt God and men who before were at variance in which couenant God doth promise to man those benefits which himselfe hath namely saluation and eternall life and man on the other part doth relie vpon God by confidence in his promises and doth confirme his faith nourish it by the testimonie of the couenant a Heb. 7.22 And for this cause is called of the Hebrewes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Berith which properly signifieth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Greeke that is a couenant betwixt them which liue 3 Metonymically with addition of Old or New it signifieth the bookes and distinct parts of the Bible The old Testament signifieth the writings of Moses and the Prophets and the new containeth the writings of the Euangelists and Apostles 2. Cor. 3 6. God hath made vs able Ministers of the Nevv Testament And verse 14. Euen vntill this day the same veile remayneth in the reading of the Old Testament Seeing the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Berith doth not signifie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or a testament but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a couenant amongst them who liue 1. Reg. 5.12 why doe the Greeke interpreters of the Bible call the couenant made by God with men 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or a testament Because 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in a generall word signifieth also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a bargaine or couenant 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which generally signinifieth to couenant and agree vpon a bargaine Luc. 23.29 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. I make a couenant with you as the father couenanted or gaue order to me 2 Againe because this couenant of God with men hath some thing common with a testament and differing from other couenants for in other couenants nothing is lesse required then the death of them who enter couenant heere on the contrarie it behooued that the couenant made betwixt God and men should be confirmed by the death of Christ For these causes also the Apostle Hebr. 9.15.16.17 Doth keepe the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and draweth an argument from the proper signification thereof And it is called a testament because it is a certaine testimonie of the will of God Of what parts consisteth the Testament betwixt God and men Of three 1. A free promise on Gods part 2 Faith in the promise on mans part 3 The outward testification or marke of the same euery of which parts by a Synecdoche a part for the whole receiue the name of Testament as Gal. 3.17 The law doth not make void the couenant confirmed before by God where the word Testament is vsed for a promise made by God to Abraham a Gen. 17.7 2. God said to Abraham b v. â— Thou therfore keep my Testament Psal 44.18 All these things are come vpon vs yet doe wee not forget thee neyther deale falsely concerning thy Testament where the word Testament is vsed to signifie the faith of man towards God 3. Gen. 17.18 This is my Testament that euerie male among you be circumcised and Luke 22 20. This cup is the new testament in my bloud and Act. 7.8 God hath giuen to Abraham the testament of circumcision It is vsed Metaphorically for an outward signe or testimonie and badge of the testament Gen. 17.11 Hath God made more or onely one couenant with men As since the time of the fall of our first parents hath beene and is the same way to attaine saluation by Christ so there is one perpetuall couenant or testament of God whereby God bindeth himselfe to giue saluation to all those who beleeue in Christ But doth not the scripture mention two couenants It doth indeed because of the dispensation of the same couenaÌ„t which at diuers times was diuersly appointed by god wherof the one is called the Old Testament the other the New Yet we must note that the old Couenant is vnderstood and called two waies somtimes in respect onely of Moses his lawgiuing and it is called the couenant of the law the sanction and establishing whereof is described Exod. 24. and sometimes to signifie the couenant of grace or free couenant in what manner it was made with Abraham and his posteritie Gen. 17.7 But by the appellation of the new couenant is vndestoode no more then the free couenant Of both these Ierem. 31.31.32 speaketh thus Bebold the daies shall come saith the Lord and I will make with the house of Israell and with the hovse of Iuda my couenant not according to that couenant which I made with their fathers in the day when I tooke them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Aegypt but this is my couenant which I will make with the house of Israell After those daiet saith the Lord I will giue my law in the middest of them and I will write in their heart and I will bee their God and they shall be my people and I will be mercifull to their iniquities After which words the Apostle addeth Hebr. 8.13 VVhen he saith a newe one he hath abrogated the former And Galat. 4.24 He teacheth that Agar the seruant was a shadow of mount Sinai from which was giuen the Law and that Sarai the free woman was a fâ—gure of the heauenly Ierusalem from which sprung the Gospell and he addeth that by these are signified the two Testaments the one bringing forth children vnto bondage that is slaues and the other to libertie or free men and in the ninth Chapter to the Hebrewes he maketh a comparison of the Old and New Testament the summe whereof commeth to this purpose that the Old testament was a shadowe of the New and the New a fulfilling of the Old the new was folded vp in the Olde and the New enfolded in the Newe But in this place where the question is concerning the likenes and difference of the Old and New Couenaunt we by the name of old vnderstand onely the free Couenant in such sorte as it was made with our fiâ—st parents straight after the fall and was confirmed to Abraham of which the law of Moses was an helpe and at length it was renued in Christ Dan. 9.27 How are these two testimonies one which are so diuers In substance or in respect of all the causes thereof to wit Efficient Matter Forme and End How do they agree in the efficient cause Because the antecedent cause of both the couenants was the wonderfull descending and as it were abasing of God whereby he stooped so low as to binde men in league and couenant vnto him which thing Moses testifyeth Deut. 8.17 9.5 Offering the pure mercie of God against the merits of the Iewes and Iosua 24.2.3 But the antecedent and meritoriovs cause is the death of
that Land when he had receiued it but is aduanced and lifted vp higher by a greater promise For thus he heareth God speake to him I am thy protectour and thine exceeding great reward So Dauid from temporall blessings riseth to that highest and last blessing Ps 73.26 The Lord is my portion for euer And Psal 16.5 The Lord is the portion of mine inheritance and of my cup thou shalt maintaine the lot of mine inheritance As on the contrarie the depriuation of that Land as being a signe of eternall life was acounted a curse But in the new Testament we are led the direct way without any turning vnto meditation of eternal life these earthly and grosse helps being omitted What is the other difference It is takē frō the Doctrin annexed to it or frō the maner of leading men to the fountaine and author of saluation and the knowledge of mercie in Christ for before the comming of Christ the administration was more burthensome troublesome and costly for God brought vp and led the auntient Fathers more straitly by laying vpon them the tuition and gouernment the teaching and obseruance of the Law a Gal. 3.24 4.1 2.3 with hard conditions and laying vpon them the yoake of many seuerall ceremonies b Act. 15.10 and the burden of his curse also But vs he intreateth more kindly and liberally without that hard strict exacting of the performāce of the Law the burthen of the curse being removed from our shoulders that intolerable yoak of ceremonies by the preaching of the Gospel Mat. 11.28 Come vnto mee all yee that are weary and heauie leaden and I will refresh you Take my yoake vpon you for my yoake is easie And from this adiunct doth Ierem. 31.31.32 take a difference betwixt the Old and New Testament by a Metonimie of the Adiunct for the Subiect calling the Lawe of Moses considered by it selfe and in it selfe a Legall and auntient Couenant because it was the law of creation whereby God tooke of vs assurance and full couenant for our perfect obedience to be performed by our owne strength a Gal. 3.12 Math. 19 19 17. Deut. 6.5 Luk. 10.27 But the Gospell couenanteth with vs that perfect obedience shall be giuen vs by him of his free voluntarie fauour is therefore a nevv and free Couenant b Ephes 2.8 Iohn 6.45 So also in respect of this adiunct the Apostle 2. Cor. 3.6.7.8.9.11 and Gal. 4.24 Compareth the Old testament or Law with the New testament or Gospell and the Old hee calleth the Letter the ministerie of death and condemnation consisting in the Letter and ingrauen in stones because the law in respect of them that heare it hath no more power then any writing in it selfe void of all force and can do nothing else but accuse vs of vnrighteousnesse wrap vp all mankind in the curse But the New Testament so farre forth as it is opposed to the law being considered by and in it selfe nakedly hee calleth the Spirit and the ministerie of the Spirit and righteousnesse that is the preaching of the Gospell because it reuealeth the mercie of God by which wee are iustified renewed by the spirit of Christ whom the Gospell hath being ioyned vnto it who also giueth to the elect that faith which he requireth of vs. Againe he calleth the Old testament a testament of bondage because it breedeth a seruile feare in our mindes because the law by adding a most hard and impossible condition can stirre vp nothing in our heatts but the feare of Gods wrath But the new he calleth a Testament of Libertie because it stirreth vp the beleeuers to a sonne-like trust in God Rom. 8.15 Yee haue not receiued the Spirit of bondage again vnto feare but the spirit of adoption by vvhich vve crie Abbafather What is the third difference It is taken from the qualitie and maner of reuelation for in the Old testament all things were set downe more darkly and the Old testament did shadow out Christ to come by promises types figures ceremonies and diuers rites and it was a portraying and sleight shadowing of the New testament for as the high priest himselfe was a type of Christ a Heb 8 1.2 9.7.8.9.11 likewise also the mercie seate b Rom. 3.24 So also were the sacrifices shadowes yea visible Sermons of Christs passion as also the purifications in the Law did shadow forth the only true expiation and pacification for sinnes which was to be made by the bloud of Christ as it is said Heb. 10.1 The Lavv had in it a shadow of good things to come not the very Image of the things But the new is administred more clearely plainely by the preaching of the Gospell by Baptisme and the Supper of the Lord it also giueth vnto vs the present inheritance and solid bodie or it sheweth vnto vs Christ who is giuen c Act. 1.8 Mat 26.28 And in respect also of this adiunct the New testament is opposed to the Old d Heb. 10.1 c. And the Old was confirmed by the slaughter of beasts and the sprinkling of their bloud but this by the bloud of Christ whereupon Christ saith at his Supper Luk. 22.20 This cup is the New Testament in my bloud The Old was temporarie and to be abolished is taken away by the comming of Christ because it had a resemblance of things to come but this because it giueth vs the bodie it selfe and the trueth of the thing it is eternall and shall neuer perish Psal 110.4 The Lord hath sworne and it shall not repent him Thou art a Priest for euer c. Thefore Augustine saith In the Old Testament is a hiding of the New in the new a manifestation of the Old What is the fourth difference It is taken from the measure of the Spirit because now is greater abundance of the Spitit in the New Testament and a greater knowledge then was before vnder the old testament if you consider the bodie it selfe of the Church a Act. 2 17 Iohn 7.38 39 Ierem. 31 34 Isa 11.9 54 13 Iohn 6.45 1 Cor. 2.10 1. Ioh 2 20.27 For although there were many vnder the Old testament who seeme to haue beene endewed by God with greater gifts then any vnder the New yet wee must iudge of the abundance and greater efficacie of the spirit vnder the new Testament not in respect of euery particular man amongst the faithfull but of all in generall or the whole Church together Hereupon Ioel. 2.28 I will poure out of my Spirit vpon all flesh that is I will giue it in great abundance Hence also the old testament is called by Paul a testament of the Letter c 2. Cor. 13.6 But the new is Spirituall because God doth shew more power of the spirit in the preaching of the Gospell then of the Law What is the last difference It is in the largenesse and newnesse of the people of God gathered together out
the inward inspiration of God alone is he therfore presently to be heard No but that wee may discerne that true and lawfull extraordinary calling from the counterfait three rules are to be obserued 1. First that there only it must haue place where there is no vsing of lawful ordinary vocation which any such teacher may seeme to haue contemned The second that the spirit of such a man be proued before it be admitted f 1. Iohn 4.1 that is that both his doctrine be tryed by the rule of gods word as neere as may be which Christ commaunded to be done in himselfe g Iohn 5.39 and which is commended in them of Beraea h act 17.10 and also that his manners and disposition be diligently looked into as Christ admonisheth Mat. 7 20. And that they be not such as are described Rom. 16.18 vvhich by faire speech and flattering do deceiue the hartes of the simple i 1. Tim. 6.3.4.5 2. Tim. 3 6. 2. Pet. 2.14 Iud. 12. 3 The third that being thus tryed they be lawfully ordeined of that church of which themselues haue laid the foundation And within these lists doe we inclose that extraordinary calling and otherwise must we neuer approue it What when ordinarie calling ceaseth ought euerie christian that hath skill in the scriptures to impugne false doctrine and to deliuer the true for that cause goe vp into the Pulpit God forbid for this were to open a dore to euerie one euerie where which esteemes himselfe a wise man vnder pretence true or false of withstanding corrupt doctrine to haue priuate conuenticles which is the practise of the Anabaptists and Libertines following the bad example of them which priuily crept in and made so great stirres first at Antioch and after that in Galatia elsewhere of whome the Apostles write thus We haue heard that certaine which departed from vs haue troubled you with wordes and combred your mindes commaunding you to be circumcised and to keepe the law to whome we gaue no such commaundement Act. 15.24 Which be the testimonies or notes of extraordinarie calling Not the gift of miracles For Iohn Baptist being extraordinarily called did no miracle a Iohn 10.41 for although he was the sonne of a Priest yet in the Temple did he not exercise the priesthood but his propheticall office without the temple So also neither Oseas nor Zephany nor Aggeus nor other prophets albeit they were extraordinarily called of God were euer famous for miracles Neither is it necessary that a vocation or succession extraordinary in respect of the order publickly receiued should be confirmed with miracles For Antichrist is not to be killed with miracles but with the spirit of Christ that is with the voice of the Gospell 2 Thess 2.8 And as for the faith which wee teach Christ and his Apostles did sufficently confirme it by miracles because they were sent by a new order instituted of God to change the gouernment of the Church Neither do we now bring forth any other bookes or any other writings then of the law of the Prophets and of the Apostles And Christ hath tolde vs that false teachers must be discerned from true ones not by miracles but by their fruites to wit of learning and of life Mat. 7.16 But these three are the signes of lawfull extraordinary calling 1. That he that doth alledge it do plainely preach the word of God b Ier. 23.21 22.27.28 27. 29 9 2. That he who is sent of God extraordinarily haue the necessarie and manifest extraordinary gifts of the holy Ghost for the execution of that his office as first of all the gift of the true wisdome of God and the knowledge of his heauenly Doctrine Secondly the gift of speaking and teaching Thirdly the gift of vndaunted constancy in the true Doctrine of the true God after the example of Esay c Is 3.8 5.8 6.1 2.3 of Christ d Mat 7.29 Luk. 4.18.22 and of Paul e Eph. 4.9 3 Gods incredible vnexpected and right maruellous blessing of the labours of such a calling the manifest successe fruite and effect of it shining in the miraculous reformation of life the most plentifull profit of the Churches and the propagation therof encreasing daily although the Diuell and the whole world doe set themselues against it f Ier. 1.8.10 19. Luk. 21.15 Rom. 15.18 19. 2. Cor. 3 3.10.3 8 1 Thes 1.5 May not they that are sent extraordinarily of God erre and slide in their doctrine They may for Aaron erred g Ex. 32.4 21 Num 12.1 and Peter in the beginning did not know that there should be a calling of the Gentiles but was to be taught this same by a heauenly vision h Act. 10 11 Of what sort is the calling of the Preachers of the Gospell in our age The calling of the first reformers of the Church if wee take the order 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the common manner and vse was ordinarie For they were Doctors Pastos and Elders from the institution of the Church of Rome But when the filthinesse of that Church was wipt away it was also lawfull although extraordinarie as might easily be gathered from the former rules signs namely excellencie might and also example of right Christian life And because their Pastours were both acknowledged and ordained of their people of their flockes and of the lawfull Magistrate therefore were they lawfull Pastors The calling of the later men and of such who haue and do succeed the former is also of God lawful but yet ordinary because they are called by the ordinary way and that same maner which is prescribed in the word of God are receiued of those congregations which as is apparant by manifest signes are the true Churches of God which haue the right of choosing Pastors Therfore the Antichristians who when they cannot conuince the Doctrine of the Gospell restored of our men of any falshood doe aske vs of our calling are by the example of Christ a Luk. 20.2 to bee sent back againe of vs to the Doctrine of Christ and his Apostles VVhat if the Romish Bishops should free themselues and their Churches from the Tyranny of the Pope and should purge them from all Idolatry and would purely preach the word of God in their Churches thus reformed haue they need of any other calling saue that which they haue already Yea verily because the Papisticall Ordinations in which there was no examination first vsed either of life or learning neither any conditions obserued in their elections which are prescribed out of the heauenly lawe and in which moreuer all pure Canons haue beene violated are nothing else but most filthy profanations And if any shall truely detest Popery from his heart verily he will renounce his most disorderly Ordination neither will hee from the right thereof chalenge vnto himselfe any authoritie Neither yet do I deny but that of the false bishops
Diuortium Diuorce IT is called Repudium of refusall for a shamefull thing Diuortium of diuerting and going into diuers parts or as some thinke of the diuersity of minde because he that is the cause of Diuorce is of another minde now than when he married the Hebrews call it Cheritot or cutting off the Greekes dissolution 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 departing cutting off as Mat. 19.8 for it was not lawfull for the wife to depart from her husband or giue him a bill of Diuorce but for an husband separating himselfe from his wife it was lawfull to giue such a Bill ſ Mat. 5.31 19.8 Deut. 24.1.2 Mal. 2.16 Is there any difference betweene Repudium and Diuortium None at all in the Scriptures Yet Modestinus saith that Repudium is betweene the bridegroome and bride but diuorce between the husband and wife after that marriage is consummated Which distinction we will obserue and first of the first Whether is mariage to be broken off by mutuall consent as it is by consent contracted No because it is not done by humane consent onely as other contracts of humane societie but by the diuine authoritie and what God hath conioyned let no man separate t Mat. 1◠6 In what cases is Repudium vsed or spousals dissolued There are seauen such cases recorded 1 If either of them fall into infamie after the betroathing for some crime 2 If either of both fall into any grieuous infirmitie of bodie or minde such as should cause the vse of mariage to be loathsome or contagious as leprosie epilepsie palsie frensie c. And indeed it were very expedient to forbid such to marie by the Laws seeing that they doe seeme to haue single life imposed vpon them from Heauen and are depriued of power to vse mariage for who can marie with a good conscience that by mariage must needes vndoe himselfe and others and beget children to perpetuall miserie and the generall hurt of the weale publike 3 If the bridegroome commit filthinesse with any of his brides kindred that mariage shall be dissolued though the party innocent be vnwilling and the incestuous person punished 4 Malitious and daily absence but yet he that is absent against his will whilst the three publishings are performed in the Church is no forsaker 5 Apostacie from the true religion and worshippe of God 6 So great offence of the mindes of the bride bridegroome as that they cannot by any meanes be reconciled and they haue not lyen together least some hainous thing might follow of such constrained mariages yet so as that they be punished for their breaking of couenant 7 If such a maime happen in the meane time as whereby the person is become loathsome prouided that they haue not lyen together Hereunto adde adultery which dissolueth the bonde both of contract of matrimonie Also contracts betweene those that are vnder age or done without parents or friends authoritie or error of person or quality as Lea for Rachel or a seruant for a freeborne or by force or feare or els vnder condition onely all which may be dissolued so that there haue beene no voluntarie coupling or consent How many waies is consummated mariage broken Two 1 When that which of it selfe and by right is none is counted for none or else is ipso iure declared to be none 2 When that which was confirmed is for lawful causes broken For whas causes is mariage declared ipso iure to be none 1 When the fault is in the contract of mariage 2 When it is in the persons contracting When is the fault in the consent or contract of mariage When the contract is either filthy or vnlawful or vniust VVhen is the consent filthy 1 When it is contrarie to the lawe of God and nature and is contracted vnder the degrees of God forbidden 2 Vnlawfull when it repugneth the edicts of Godly Magistrats But yet this difference is to be noted that wicked contracts within the degrees forbidden by Gods lawe neither can nor ought to be confirmed either by humane dispensation or Ecclesiasticall benediction or carnall copulation But contracts within degrees forbidden by the Magistrate may be permitted by some dispensation where necessitie and reason requireth it VVhat contract is vniust That which is done by children that are vnder the gouernment of their Parents against their consent and authoritie iudging well and rightly which if the Parents will by no means ratifie Mat. 19.6 it ought to be none for as Christ saith That which God hath ioyned together let no man set asunder so that which man conioyneth against or besides Gods word God will haue separated What fault is that betweene the persons which maketh mariage ipso iure to be none Wheras she that was maried for a maid is found by certain testimonies to haue bin defiled for such a one ought by the law of god to be stoned to death as an adulteresse b Deut. 22.29 Caus 29. quest 1. Can 1. Wheras the Canonists say notwithstāding that fornication following mariage only hurteth 2 If either of thē hauing som natural impotēcy be vnfit for mariage or if either of thē haue concealed some defect or incurable disease which was not knowne before mariage as to be an Eunuch either by nature or other casualty Mat. 19.12 such a defect forbiddeth mariage when one erreth the other deceiueth according to that rule Errantis voluntas nulla an erring will is no will and that contract of good faith where craft hath beene cause is ipso iure none And forasmuch as God reprooueth deceipt fraud and errour he is not to be called the author of such mariages How many waies is mariage made said to be dissolued By two 1 By death as the Apostle reasoneth a 1. Cor. 7.39 Rom. 7.2.3 Mat. 22.30 against Tertullian Montanus and Hierom. And Christ teacheth that in heauen they neither marie nor giue in mariage 2 Mariage is dissolued by Diuorcement Doth it agree with Gods Lawe for a man to put away his wife Not simply for it is neither simply commaunded nor forbidden but permitted by giuing of a bill of Diuorce for hereof Moses hath a politike but not a morall law b Deut. 24.1 But the reason of this Lawe seemeth not so much to be necessary as of rash leuitie and hardnesse of heart There was indeede some reason of necessitie in respect of the wiues for it was fitter for them to be once dimitted than to be alwaies in ill handling or els in danger of life Therefore the Lord appointed for such as would not be perswaded to keepe their wiues not Diuorcement but a manner of Diuorcing to wit to giue a bill of Diuorce for the wiues safety against her husbands crueltie and that not without his owne infamie But the rashnesse of husbands exceeded which for euerie occasion sought to be diuorced and this rashnesse was to be bridled Whereupon Christ saith Moses suffered you to put away your
will be thy God and of thy seede after thee Gen. 17.7 Is Originall sinne the sinne of another or is it euery mans proper sinne It is another mans sinne because being committed by Adam it is deriued to vs from the same author and yet is not lesse proper to any one of vs then it was to Adam First because Adam sinned not as a priuate man but as head of all mankind 2. Because as mans nature communicated by him becomes euery mans owne nature so also his sin communicated by propagation and death vvhich entred by sin becomes euery mans ovvne sinne 3. Because the opposition betwixt the obedience of Christ the disobedience of Adam requireth it to be so d Rom. 5.18.19 As therefore the obedience of Christ is so communicated to his members that euery faithfull person may call it his owne so the vnrighteousnes of Adam is so made common to all men that euery man is punished for his owne fault May the sinnes of other parents be said to be conueyed into their children as the sinne of Adam is said to be The case differeth because that first sinne was not so much personall and proper to Adam as natural that is common to al mens nature which originally and naturally was in his Loynes therfore truely originall But other sinnes of Adam and of other men were truely personall Of which Ezech. 18.20 The sonne shall not beare the iniquitie of the father but the soule that sinneth shall die Yet it shall be no absurditie if wee say that the sinnes of our next parents and auncestors are communicated to their children by corrupt seed their bodie being first stained with sinne and after the soule being infected by the bodie whence is is said Exod. 20.5 I will visite the iniquitie of the fathers vpon the children But that children are not alwaies borne like to their wicked parents it proceedeth from the speciall grace of God Is Originall sinne a Substance or an Accident It is no substance for then it should be either a soule or a bodie but the bodie and soule in respect of the substance are the good creatures of God which are also as yet created by God wherefore they are not sinne Neither is it a substantiall propertie or any thing substantiall in man but it is an outward and accidentall qualitie which notwithstanding is called natural not that it hath proceeded from nature insomuch as it is created but because it seizeth vpon men and possesseth them as by right of inheritance and cleaueth to the nature of man his strength and naturall faculties and is naturally bred in man Ephes 2.3 By nature wee are the sonnes of wrath Rom 7.17.20.21 The Sinne that dwelleth in me the euil which is present with mee saith the Apostle Is it an accident which may be separated from man Augustines words may serue for answere hereunto Lib. 1. de Concupiscentia c. 25. Originall sin is remitted not so as it is no longer originall sinne but so that now it is not imputed the guilt thereof is past and gone the actuall being of it remaineth therefore also doth death it selfe remaine What is the subiect of Originall sinne The whole man both in bodie and soule from head to foote with all his powers and faculties of bodie and soule as well the higher as lower as vnderstanding will sense Whereupon the Apostle Ephes 4.17.18 affirmeth the minde is addicted to vanitie the thought to blindnesse and the heart to wickednesse Rom. 8.7 The wisdome of the flesh is enmitie against God The same thing is manifest by our renewing which the Apostle attributeth to spirit soule and bodie a Rom. 12.1 Ephes. 4.33 1 Thessa 5.23 How many parts are there of this corruption Two A defect and concupiscence or a peruerse and inordinate inclination to euill The defect is a wanting of Originall righteousnesse as there are in the minde of man blindnesse and ignorance of heauenly things in the will and heart a turning away from God or a depriuation of the loue of God and men b Rom. 3.23 1. Cor. 2.14 The naturall man perceiueth not the things of Gods spirit Concupiscence is not a naturall desire of meat drinke generation and delight in the senses neither motions of the heart such as affections are neither onely a disorder of appetites and desires but it is a readie inclination of all our strength to doe those things which are forbiddeâ— in the lawe of God of which nature is darknesse of our vnderstanding doubting in our mindes of God and of his prouidence in our will and heart contumacie and stubbornnesse against God Because Paule saith Rom. 7.18 I know that in me that is in my flesh there dwelleth no good and vers 23. I see another Lawe in my members resisting the Lawe of my minde doth it therfore follow hence that the highter part of the soule is not the subiect of concupiscence but onely the sensitiue part No for he doth not oppose flesh and members to the minde that is reason such as it is without the light of the holy Ghost but he opposeth the flesh to the spirit that is to spirituall gifts or regeneration in as much as it is begunne in man by the Holie Ghost But are that priuation of Originall righteousnesse and concupiscence sinnes They are 1. Because that priuation is transgression of the law 2. Because it is a sin not to be such a one as God commands thee to be But concupiscence it selfe also is a sinne because Deut. 10.16 we are commanded to circumcise the foreskins of our hearts and in the law it is said Thou shalt not couet Exod. 20.17 3. Because Rom. 7.7 the Apostle teacheth that concupiscence remaineth euen in the regenerate which constantly hee calleth a sinne against which we must without ceasing fight and he plainly affirmeth that it disagreeth with Gods Law I had not knowne saith hee that concupiscence is sinne except the Lawe had said Thou shalt not couet Whosoeuer looketh vpon a woman to lust after her hath already committed adultery with her in his heart Mat. 5.28 And 1. Iohn 2.16 The concupiscence of the flesh is not of the father And the Apostle calleth euen that euil which he willeth not that is to which hee yeeldeth not consent Rom. 7.19 I do not that good I would but that euill which I would not Lib. 3. contra Iul. Therefore Augustine ascribeth three things to concupiscence that it is sinne and the cause of sinne the punishment of sinne What is Originall sinne therefore Anselmus thus describeth Originall sinne It is a wanting of originall righteousnesse which ought to be in man We describe it in this maner It is not onely a priuation of Originall righteousnes but both a deprauing and corruption of mans nature spread vpon al parts of the soule propagated from Adam to his posteritie and it is a guiltinesse wherby euen the newe borne infants are also corrupt by Adams fall and are therefore
againe to repentance For whereas true repentance commeth from Gods spirit and we obtaine the spirit of God in Christ alone by faith therefore they can neuer repent who haue sinned against the holy Ghost and therefore can neuer obtaine pardon For if they repented certainly they should obtaine pardon as God promiseth by Ezechiel cap. 18.21 That he will be mercifull when a sinner shall truly be turned seeing God can no more despise him who truly repenteth then his owne spirit b 1 Ioh. 5.16 How doth vnpardonable sinne differ from mortall sinne 1 Because all vnpardonable sinne is mortall but not all mortall sinne vnpardonable 2 Because the mortall sinne becommeth veniall when they doe now beleeue who before did not beleeue but vnpardonable sinne neuer becommeth veniall because they neuer repent or beleeue who haue this sinne What sinnes come neere to this sinne 1 The sinne of the diuels who wittingly and willingly persecute the knowen truth with horrible hatred and furie 2 Denying of Christ proceeding of infirmitie 3 Sinnes against a mans owne conscience often repeated and fallen into are the way to sinne against the holy Ghost for as it is said of diseases of the bodie so fitly it may be applied to the diseases of the soule Too late is helpe of medicine found When old disease hath gotten ground What opinions are contrarie to this Doctrine The errour of the Donatists and Nouatians who denied that they who fell could haue pardon or remission of sinnes abusing that place Heb. 10.26 Whereas there is great difference betwixt the fall of them who sinne knowing of it and their fall who professedly do altogether depart and reuolt from Christ are delighted with impietie and make warre against the truth Otherwise Dauids and Peters cases were desperate yea we were all gone contrarie to that saying of Christ Forgiue seuentie times seuen times Math. 18.22 and Ezech. 18.21 At what time soeuer a sinner repenteth I will no more remember his sinnes And likewise this is contrarie to the examples of Dauid Ezechias Manasses Peter who were receiued into fauour and mercie ⧠The eighteenth common Place Of free will after the fall of man VVhat is vsually vnderstood in this disputation by the name of freewill A Faculty or power of mans mind or vnderstanding to discerne and know good or euill of the will to choose or refuse eyther and of the strength to performe eyther good or euill What is the reason of this name Liberū arbitriū In respect of the mind which sheweth the obiect to be chosen or refused it is called Arbitrium will and in respect of the will which voluntarily and of the owne accord followeth or tefuseth the iudgement of the vnderstanding it is called Liberum free Is there such free will in man after the fall There can be no answer made simply to this question but there is need of a twofold distinction for mens actions are to be distinguished whereof some are naturall and sensuall as to eate to drinke to moue from place to place some morall and animall or pertaining to the reasonable part of the soule such are priuate actions Oeconomicall or Politicall also outward actions in Gods worship and some are supernaturall or spirituall In the first sort of actions man hath choise left vnto him In the second the minde is much darkened the iudgement is not sound nor the will chearefull neither the strength able to performe Thereupon came that speech of Medea Video meliora proboque Deteriora sequor I see the better and approoue it But still the worse my mind doth couet In the third kind another distinction must be vsed for a man after the fall is considered in three respects before his conuersion and regeneration in his conuersion and after his conuersion VVhat thinke you then of the free will of man before his conuersion I thinke it is altogether wicked and euill for the soule though it remaine whole in the essence thereof with her powers the wil vnderstanding yet the strength ability of these powers vnto any spirituall good is lost For the vnderstanding is plainely blinde in heauenly matters destitute of the true knowledge of God and of the wholsome vnderstanding of the word according to Dauids saying Psal 14.3 a Rom. 3.11 There is not a man that vnderstandeth And of Paul 1. Cor. 2.14 The naturall man perceiueth not the things of the spirit of God And Rom 8.7 The wisdome of the flesh is enemy to God for it is not subiect to the law of God neither indeed can be And Ephe. 4 23. he biddeth vs be renued in the spirit of our mind by the spirit of the mind vnderstāding the principal part of the whol 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Philosphers terme it The wil is altogether turned away from God Psa 53.3 There is none that seeketh God they are al gone astray 3 Our strength and endeuors are taken quite away they altogether become vnprofitable in the same Psalme b Rom. 3.3 And 1. Cor. 12.3 No man can say that Iesus is the Lord but by the holy ghost And 1. Cor 3.5 We are not sufficient of our selues to thinke any good thing And Phil. 2.13 It is God who worketh in vs both to will and to do Are we therefore like senselesse stocks in regard of spiritual things No for man is not spoyled by sin of the power of vnderstanding or willing but his vnderstāding is become blind his wil peruerse But what doth not Paule say Rom. 2.14 That the Gentiles by nature do the worke of the law in the 15 verse that they shew the worke of the law written in their hearts The Apostle speaketh of that natural knowledge which is writtē in the minds of all men which is sufficient to take away from men all pretence of ignorance and to make them vnexcusable but he speaketh not of abilitie to fulfill the law And Paule saith not that the Gentiles did the law but the things of the law that is certaine outward works agreeing in some sort with the law for in other places of Scripture as in Ierem. 31.33 they are said to haue the law writtē in their harts whose harts God hath circumcised by his holy spirit c Deut. 30.6 But the Gentiles excelled in notable gifts which gifts seeme to shew that mans nature is not altogether corrupted 1 The corruption and faultines of their nature was not purged away but kept in and restrained by God least that like a wild beast it should violently be caried to the mischiefe of mankinde 2 Those gifts were not common giftes of nature but speciall graces of God which he dispenseth and distributeth to men otherwise in themselues profane diuersly and in certaine measure that he may thereby prouide for the welfare of mankinde 3 Whatsoeuer in their actions was praise-worthie was polluted with ambition and was farre frō a desire of illustrating gods glory 4 They were not vertues properly but Images and
onely not vnderstand those things which belong to true pietie but euen in things belonging to this life is blinde and oft is deceiued 2. That saying of Cicero That a man must aske of God good fortune but wisdome he must take from himselfe 3. Of the Pelagians that man by the proper strength of his nature without the grace of God can turne himselfe to God and by his pure naturall gifts can fulfill the Lawe 4. The errour of those Semipelagians who attribute our conuersion partly to Gods grace partly to the power of free will And that of the Schoolemen who say that a man by doing as much as lyes in his power deserues grace de congruc that free will worketh together with the grace of God and that in motions of the Spirit it is not taken away nor lost but onely weakned and that the will can prepare it selfe to grace 5. Of the fathers of the Counsell of Trent who affirme that the strength and faculties of the soule are indeede bound and entangled in the snares of sinnes so as a man cannot by his owne power winde himselfe out but yet that they are not put out nor extinct but only feeble as a sick man whose strength is impaired by some disease who is refreshed when the physitian commeth to him and layeth his hand vpon him or as a bird which hath abilitie and power to flye but beeing tyed by a thred can not exercise the vse of that facultie 6. That Position of the first vniuersall grace that the Lord openeth all mens eyes that they may see and their eares that they may heare if they will seeing it is required that they haue a power to will 7 The errour of the Enthusiastes who boast of visions speculations conference familiar speech with God inspiration without Gods word and doe imagine that men are compelled haled and pulled to their conuersion and vpon this false ground they contemning the word of God doe expect that drawing and forcing of the spirit The ninteenth common Place Of the Lawe From whence is the Latine name of Lawe to wit Lex taken EITHER of binding Lex a ligando because the Law bindeth those vpon whom it is imposed either to obedience or punishment or else a legendo of reading because Lawes were vsed to bee read publikely or ab eligendo chosing because it is a rule of things to be chosen or refused the Greeke word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to distribute because it giueth each man his right What significations hath the word Lawe 1. It is in generall vsed for all Doctrine which prescribeth any thing as in Hebrew it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Torah of Iarah which signifieth to teach For which cause also the Gospell is called a law Esa 2.3 The Lavv is gone forth of Sion and the cōmandement of the Lord from Ierusalem So Ierem. 31.33 I vvill put my lavv in their invvard parts and in their hearts I vvill vvrite it And Rom. 3.20 The Gospell in that place is called the Law of Faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by imitation that is a Doctrine which propoundeth saluation vpon this condition If thou beleeue 2. More specially the Law signifieth the Old Testament Rom. 3.19 Wee knovv that vvhatsoeuer the Lavv saith it saith it to them vvhich are vnder the Lavv. 3. When the Law is opposed to the Prophets it signifieth only the bookes of Moses and it is distinguished from the Prophets Psalms Luc. 24.22 Those things vvhich are vvritten in the book of Moses in the Prophets in the Psalmes And Rom. 3.21 The righteousnes of faith hath testimonie in the Law Prophets 4. When it is opposed to the Gospell it is taken for the Law the things thereto belonging as it is in the same Chapter ver 28. VVee are iustified by faith vvithout the workes of the Lavv. 5. When it is opposed to grace it signifieth the wrath of God and damnation and the rigour of Iustice as Rom. 6.14 VVe are not vnder the Lavv but vnder grace So Gal. 3.18 If yee be led by the Spirit yee are not vnder the Lavv. 6. Sometimes it is opposed to the trueth and then it signifieth the shadowes of the Lawe that is the Ceremonies of the Lawe As Iohn 1.17 The Lavve vvas giuen by Moses but grace and truth by Iesus Christ 7. When it is opposite to the time wherein Christ was giuen it signifieth the whole policie gouernment of Moses as Gal. 3.20 Before faith came vve vvere kept vnder the lavv As also it signifieth the ordinance of the Priesthoode Math. 11.13 The lavv and the Prophets prophecied vnto Iohn a Heb. 7 12 10.11 8. The Law is somtime by a Metonimie taken for rule authority soueraignty and commaund or that force which constraineth a man to any thing as when it is said The lavv of the spirit of life the lavv of Sinne and death b Rom. 8.2 the Lavv of the members c Rom. 7.23 But vvhat vnderstand you in this place by the vvord Lavv I vnderstand a law put into mēs hearts by God afterwards repeated by Moses which cōmandeth holy and iust things promiseth eternal life on this condition If thou shalt do all these things Again it threatneth a curse if a man faile but in the least of them d Iam. 2.10 Gal 3 10. What Epithets and titles be giuen to the Lavv in Scripture Diuers but in diuers respectes For when comparison is made betweene the Law and Gospell especially in the article of Iustification then Paule giueth the law such termes and appellations as seeme ignominious but this is by relation 1. By our fault not any fault in the Law For he calleth it a Schoole-maister a prison that shutteth vp a Gal 3.23.24 the yoake of bondage b Gal. 5 1 the povver or force of sinne c 1 Cor 15 56. the operation of vvrath and of death d Rom. 4.15 7.5 vveake and beggerly elements of the vvorld e Gal. 4.9 the ministerie of death and condemnation the killing letter f 2 Cor. 3 6 7.9 the hand vvriting vvhich is against vs g Col 2 14 the Testament vvhich begetteth vnto bondage h Gal. 4 24 But being considered by it self as a Doctrine published by god it is called a holie Lavve and a holy and good commaundement i. a vvord of life a cōmandement vvhich is vnto life i Rom. 7 12 Who is author of the Lavve k Act 7 58 l Rom. 7 10 God himself who in the beginning put it in the minds of men then in Mount Sinah he engraued it in tables of stone and gaue it Moses to be published m Exod 32 16 What ioynt causes Ministers vvere there in publishing the lavv 1. The Angels who were not the authors but messengers and witnesses imployed in the publication of the Lawe which was done by God
say concerning the obseruation of the Law that it is a yoak which neither the Apostls nor they which beleeued neither the primitiue Church nor the fathers could beare Act. 15.10 which thing surely is to be vnderstood also of the iustified regenerate persoÌ„s What is the first vse of the Morall Lavv There is a threefold vse of it to Restraine to condemne to Teach 1. The first is outward which is also called Paedagogicall Disciplinarie and politique which by feare of punishment and the terrour of Gods reuenge doth restraine euen the vnregenerate men from the outward worke of sinne and it is necessarie to preserue the publique societie and communitie amongst men to maintaine peace Which vse Paul commendeth 1. Tim. 1.9 when he saith The Lavv vvas not giuen for the righteous man not onely in regard of iustification or condemnation but in respect of compulsion as the mother loueth and cherisheth her owne childe of her owne accord not beeing compelled by the Law though the Lawe coÌ„maund this also but vnto the vniust to the disobedient c. And this vse may serue to keepe euery man in the limits of his dutie and to rule his outward maners with which vse the Pharisees and Hypocrites contented themselues In respect whereof also Paul Phi. 3.6 saith that before his conuersion he was vnrebukeable What is the second vse It is inward or secret which smiteth the conscience of man doth detect conuince and condemne sin and bringeth man forth to Gods iudgement seate and maketh him subiect to the sentence of Gods curse Of this vse it is saide Rom. 3.20 By the lavv is the knowledge of sinne And chap. 7.9 I liued sometimes vvithout the law that is through my security I felt not the iudgement of the Law but when the commaundement came sinne reuiued and I became dead that is I vnderstood I was worthy of death and damnation In respect of this vse the Lavv is said to worke vvrath Rom. 4.15 because it denounceth the wrath of God and proclaimeth vs subiect to Gods anger And 2. Cor. 3. The Law is the ministerie of death that is it causeth by the acknowledgement of sinne to vnderstand that wee are worthy of death that is condemnation This property the law hath in it not by any fault in it self for in the owne nature it is good and holy but through the fault of our corrupt nature For as the touch stone is not gold but a meanes to discouer pure Gold from counterfaite so the lawe is not the cause of sin but a touchstone discouering iust from vniust Rom. 7.5.7 This vse serueth to terrifie them that are desperate and forlorne and to bring them in awe who are not desperate and to prepare them to seeke remedy and to receiue that remedy which is offered to them in Christ In which respect the law is said to haue bin our Schoole-master to bring vs to Christ Gal. 4.24 For where as it reproued all men of vnrighteousnesse it likewise admonisheth theÌ„ that righteousnes was to be sought in Christ except they would rather perish An example of this vse we haue in Dauid after hee heard himselfe rebuken by Nathan 2 Sam. 12.1 13. and in Ezechiah who saith Esai 38.13 Like a Lyon he hath broken all my bones And Act. 2.14.23.37 When as at that Sermon of the law made by Peter wherein hee obiecteth to them ingratitude towards god and murder of Christ the innocent that is the breaking of both tables of the lawe they being pricked in their hearts said vnto the Apostles Men and brethren vvhat shall wee do To whom Peter answereth Repent you vers 38. For as lime is set on fire by the water and quenched with Oyle so by accident sinne is encreased by the Lawe and the terrours and astonishments of the heart daunted by the iudgement and sentence which the lawe awardeth are healed by oile powred vpon that is by hearing the comfort of the Gospell What is the third vse It is a spirituall vse because it belongeth to men regenerate by Gods spirit whom it teacheth and instructeth in the true worship of god the rule of liuing rightly Concerning this god by Ezechiell speaketh Chap. 20.19 VValke yee in my precepts c. In respect of this Law Dauid commendeth the Law diuersly magnifieth it The Law of the Lord is vnspotted conuerting soules the Statutes of the Lord are right reioycing the heart the commandemeÌ„t of the Lord is cleeere and giueth light to the eyes c a Psal 19.8.6 Haue they who are regenerate by the holy Ghost any neede of the Law seeing they haue the Holy Ghost for their teacher and leader They haue neede 1. Because mans reason easilie wandereth and erreth from the way as soone as it is not ruled by gods word 2. God will not haue vs by our endeauour and at our owne pleasure to inuent workes or seruice for him but he will haue vs gouerned by his word Psal 119.105 Thy word is a Lanthorne vnto my feete And Mat. 15.9 In vaine they worship me teaching Doctrines and commandements of men 3. That rule of liuing godly and well which the Holy ghost teacheth is no other then that which the law prescribeth 4. Because of the reliques of the flesh for the faithfull are not in all parts regenerate and therefore ir is expedient that they be daily more instructed concerning the will of god and that their slouthfulnesse should be stirred and as it were spurred forward by exhortations ready to obey VVhat is the ceremoniall Lavv It is that which prescribed in Ecclesiasticall rites and outward ceremonies as 1. Sacrifice 2. Other holy things as places and vessels or set times and solemnities 3. Sacraments 4. Certaine obseruations in meate a Deut. 14.6 12 21 apparrell b Leui p 17 12. plowing c deut 22.5 11. sowing d Vers 19 vncircumcision of trees e Lev. 19.23 fouling f Deut. 22 6 and many other thing as also the outward worshippe of God the vse lasted whilest Moses gouernment endured both in the Tabernacle which was made to be caried about and also in Solomons Tâ—mple which was seated in one place as likewise without the Temple VVhat vvas the vse of Ceremonies and Sacrifices 1. That they might be Images or pictures of the inward worship which was due vnto God 2. That they might shew the vncleannesse of sinne which cleaueth to man and that they might testifie what men deserue in themselues namely death and eternall damnation and thus farre they were appurtenances of the morall Law 3. That they might be visible sermons to the godly of Christs passion and death by which they should be deliuered from that misery in this respect they were as it were certaine types of the Gospell in which consideration the Law is sâ—â—de and that chiefely to bee a Schoole-maister to bring vs to Christ a Gal 3.24 For Circumcision did mistically preach the promised seede of Abraham Washings
end which is common both to the Law and Gospell or in the manner of obtaining righteousnesse for the doctrine of the law is the law of works which preacheth of doing and giueth the reward to him that doeth the law but the Gospell is the law of faith which imputeth faith unto righteousnesse to him that doth not worke but beleeueth in him who iustifieth the vngodly Rom. 3.21 4.5 10.5 Moreouer the law requireth of man a mans owne proper righteousnes and perfect obedience to all the commandements of God which he is bound in his owne behalfe to performe Leuit. 18.5 Mat. 19.17 If thou vvilt enter into life keepe the commaundements but to him that hath not this obedience it threatneth a curse b Deut 7 2. Gal. 3 10 But seeing it is impossible for man to attaine this end by reason of the corruption of the flesh c Rom 8 3.7 the Gospell offereth vs the righteousnes of another namely of Christ to be receiued of vs by faith that they which beleeue the Gospell may haue by imputation that which the law requireth to be in a man by propertie Rom. 5.19 By one mans obedience shall many be made righteous And Christ is the fulfilling of the law vnto righteousnes to euery one that beleueth Rom. 10.4 or which commeth to the same effect we may thus say The law demādeth the sum of our debt the Gospell publisheth the remission of it 3 They differ in the forme or difference of the promises for the promises in the law of eternal life temporall benefits are conditional That is they require the condition of perfect fulfilling the law as a cause as for example If thou do these things thou shalt liue in thē where the particle If for because expresseth the cause for our obediēce is required in the law as a cause But the promises of the gospel are free are not giuē because of fulfilling the law but frely for Christs sake Therfore whē it is said If thou beleeue the particle If is not causal but syllogistical that is it sheweth a consequence neither is there signifyed by it a cause or desert but a mean instrumēt without which applicatiō of Christs benefits cānot be made Therfore the particle freely doth especially make a difference betwixt the gospel the law Rom 3.24 Being iustified freely by his grace through the redemption of Iësus Christ which grace is set forth by many parables in the gospell 4 They differ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say by the effects adiuncts efficacy office of either of them For first the law teacheth good works neither doth it minister strength to the auditors therof by which they may performe those works neyther changeth the minds of men for of the law Moses speaketh thus Deu. 29.4 Ye haue heard seen but God hath not giuen you an vnderstanding hart But the gospell endoweth the saints with the holy ghost which spirit doth also giue that which the gospell requireth to wit faith Ier. 31.33 I will write my law in their hearts not with inke but vvith my spirit And the Apostle Gal. 3.2 speaketh thus This one thing I vvould knovv of you haue you receiued the spirit by the vvorks of the lavv or by the hearing of faith Therfore Paul 2. Cor. 31.8 calleth the lavv the ministery of death vvritten in the tables of stone but the gospell the spirit planted in the heart and ver 9 he calleth the law the ministery of condemnation but the gospell the ministery of righteousnes 2. Againe the law sheweth the disease accuseth exasperateth and laieth open sins but doth not take them away Rom. 3.20 But the gospell couereth sin and healeth the disease by declaring and pronoūcing free pardon of sins by Christ alone for this cause no man could euer be iustified by the law but by faith of the gospell we are all iustified 3. In the law is reueiled the wrath of God vpon euery man in the gospell without the law is reueiled the righteousnes of God from faith vnto faith Rom. 1.17 3.21 5 Lastly the Law and the Gospell do differ in the application to the obiectes or degrees of men for as the Apostle commaundeth 2. Tim. 2.15 that Doctors should rightly cut the word of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the preaching of the law properly belongeth to the impenitent and they who are not yet conuerted and those who continue in their sinnes hypocrites and secure persons as Christ Mat. 22.37 vseth the threatning of the law against a proud Lawyer Therefore saith the Apostle 1. Tim. 1.9 The law was made for the vniust But the Gospell belongeth to the repentant Therefore Christ in Luke 4.18 out of Isay 61.1 teacheth that the Gospell is to bee preached to them that are poore in spirit and of a contrite heart Therefore also Luke 7.48.50 he preached grace and mercie to the penitent woman Is it necessarie and profitable to know the difference of the Law and Gospell It is for the name it selfe doth cleeeely proue that the law is one kinde of doctrine and the Gospell another 2 Because the not knowing of this difference is a fountaine of error obscuring the light of the doctrine of Christ of the righteousnes of faith of perturbations of conscience On the contrarie by the difference of them both the office and benefits of Christ are better vnderstood 3 The Church is discerned and acknowledged from other sects and true faith and conscience is kept in great and true horrors of conscience What things are repugnant heerto 1 The error of the Papists who make no difference betwixt the Law and the Gospell but transforme rhe Gospell into a law and call it a more perfect law saying also that the old law was a law of feare the new a law of loue and that Christ hath merited and doth giue to vs that grace whereby we may fulfill the commaundements and by them attaine righteousnesse and eternal life 2 Of the Monks who cal those things which Christ Mat. 5 38. 6.31 19.11.12.21 speaketh to expound the lawe to lance the conscience and to stirre them vp to a desire of himselfe counsels onely necessary for them who desire something more perfect then the law of Moses commaundeth of this nature they faine three things chiefly to be deliuered by him 1. of not reuēging 2 of pouerty 3. of virginity but the precepts they say are necessary to al men where as on the cōtrary there is not the least word which Christ spoke which wee must not obey 3 The error of Pelagius and the Schoolemen who haue taught that the Patriarches were iustified and saued by obseruation of the law of nature the Iewes by keeping the law of Moses but Christians by obseruation of the new law of the Gospell The two and twentieth common Place Of the difference of the old and new Testament What signifieth the word Testament PRoperly it signifieth the iust and true meaning of our
the Mediatour a Apoc 13.8 Dan. 9.27 How are they all one in matter Because the foundation and substance thâ—reof is onely Christ the Mediator without whom God cannot receiue men into fauor and this is he who is that blessed seed in whom all the nations of the earth were to be blessed b Gen. 12.2 So Paul 2. Cor. 5.19 God was in Christ not imputing their sinnes and Heb. 13.8 Christ remaineth the same to day and yesterday and for euer 2 Because both the Sacraments haue one signification yea the Sacraments of both couenants are the same I say the same in signification and vse that is testimonies of the same grace as Paulo testifieth that the Israelites had the same Baptisme and the same supper which we haue 1. Cor. 10.2.3 for although there appeare some diuersitie in the matter of the signes and the number therof yet here is no matter to be made therof as in the mariage ring vsed to make contracts there is no regard made whether it be of gold or of siluer whether it be one or more but only the end and promise made to the confirmation of that wherof it is made How doe they agree in the forme Because the mean or maner whereby we cleaue to God was one alwaies namely faith as the Apostle sheweth Heb. 11. and Christ Iohn 8.56 Abraham reioyced to see my day and he saw it namely by the eyes of faith and Paul Rom. 3.21 that the righteousnes Which is of Faith hath testimonie from the Law the Prophets And Gen. 15.6 Ahraham belieued God and it was imputed vnto him for righteousnesse which was written for vs c. How agre they in the end or marke whereat they driue Because the old testament as also the new doth did stirre vp the elect not vnto a carnall or earthly felicitie and the benefits of this present life but much more vnto hope of blessed immortality How prooue you this 1. By the forme of the couenant it selfe which was one both before and after Christs manifestation in the flesh for God alwaies made such a couenant with his seruants as he did with Abraham Gen. 17.1.7 I am Schaddai that is God all sufficient thy God and the GOD of thy seede after thee keepe thou my couenant walke before me and be vpright Leu. 26.12 I will bee your God and you shall bee my people in which words euen the Prophets themselues declared that life saluation and all blessednesse yea euen heauenly blessednesse is coÌ„prehended For he declareth to theÌ„ that hee will not bee the God of their bodies onely but especially of their soules but the soules vnlesse they bee ioyned vnto God by righteousnesse are separated from him and remaine in death Yea moreouer God hath professed himselfe to bee the God of them who are alreadie deceased namely Abraham Isaac and Iacob a Exo. 3.6 Mat. 22.32 2. By the examples of the fathers Adam Abell Noah Abraham Isaac and Iacob who neglected this present life amidst the many temptations sorrowes which happen in the whole course of their life did with all their hearts labour to come vnto the habitation of eternall felicitie so as both they and they also who belieued vnder the new testament did aime at the same marke Which thing the Apostle confirmeth Heb. 11.9.10 By faith Abraham tarried in the Land of promise as in astrange country as one that dwelled in tents vvith Isaac and Iacob who were partakers of the same inheritance For hee looked for a citie hauing a good foundation vvhose builder and maker is God And vers 13. All these dyed in faith and receiued not the promises but savv them a farre off and beleeued and receiued them thankfullie and confessed that they vvere strangers and pilgrimes in the earth Gen. 47.9 Whereupon wee necessarily gather that the promise of that land made vnto them by God is not principally and properly to bee vnderstoode of that very land it selfe and of an earthly felicitie but of eternall life signified by it Therefore also they desired to bee buried in that land as being a pledge of eternall life giuen them by God a Gen. 47.29.30 50.25 And Iacob being readie to die professed that hee waited for the saluation of the Lord b Gen. 45.18 3 By the testimonie of Balaam himselfe who was not void of the knowledge of this end when as he said Numb 23.10 Let my soule die the death of the iust and let my last end be like his The same thing Dauid afterwards expounded Ps 116.15 when hee saith that the death of the Saints is pretious in the sight of the Lord but the death of the wicked is very euill 4. By the testimonie of the Prophets who in a most full perfect light did beholde and expect eternall life and the Kingdome of Christ as Dauid psalm 39.13.14 I am a soiourner and a stranger as all my fathers And v. 6.7.8 Euery man liuing is vanitie euery man walketh like a shadow and now O Lord what is my expectation my hope is euen in thee But aboue all others most notable is the saying of Iob. cap. 19.25 I know that my Redeemer liueth and I shall see God in my flesh My hope is vvithin me The Prophets also do testifie that this couenant made by God with the fathers was spirituall eternall and heauenly c Isa. 51.6 66.22 Dan. 12.2 5. Because Christ promising heauenly felicitie to his Disciples saith that they shall sit downe with Arbraham Isaac and Iacob in the Kingdom of Heauen Mat. 8.11 6. Because the holy fathers were endewed with the same spirit of faith wherwith we are a Gen. 15.6 2. Cor. 4.13 Heb. 11 Out of which and other like places that is euicted which we were to proue namely that in the old testament the same end was proposed to the faithfull which is proposed to the beleeuers in the new testament Seing that in substance there is one onely Testament why is it called 2. Testaments namelie the Old and the New By a diuision not of the Genus into Species but of the subiect into accidents that is the substance is not diuided but the diuerse accidents which are without the essence of it make things seeme diuerse which in it selfe remaineth one the same in substance Therefore in what doth the diuersitie of the couenant consist It is wholy in the adiuncts which are outward and accessarie things or in the maner of administration and circumstances of the dispensation thereof VVhat is the first difference It is taken from the maner of leading vnto the end propounded to both testaments namely to eternall life for vnder the old testament the Church which was yet in her nonage and tender yeares was led as it were by the hand vnto the heauenly inheritance by the helpe of earthly benefits especially by that grosser and plainer type of the Land of Canaan Therfore Abraham is not suffered to rest in the promise of
He renounceth his owne righteousnesse which is by the Law resteth vpon the righteousnesse which is by the faith of Iesus Christ or from God by faith Why is the exclusiue particle alone added in this proposition We are iustified by faith alone That it might be vnderstood that the promise of saluation is receiued by faith alone and doth not depend vpon any worthinesse or merit of our worke Can this exclusiue particle alone bee prooued by Scripture Yes it may for Mar. 5.36 it is in expresse words where Christ comforting Iairus saith vnto him Feare not only beleeue In which words Christ doth plainely declare that hee looketh for nothing but faith alone without which it is impossible to please God Heb. 11.6 2. There is asmuch in effect Gal. 2.16 Where Paul saith that men are not iustified but by faith adding expresly not by works R◠3.28 without works for he that taketh away righteousnesse from works doth soundly enough ascribe it vnto faith alone The same thing the word freely Rom. 3.24 confirmeth For this word excludeth all maner of merit and desert from him to whome is done either good or euill as Ps 35.19 They hated mee freely vvithout a cause that is without any cause of hatred proceeding from me 3. The Apostle Rom. 10.3 pronounceth that the Iewes were therefore not subiect to the righteousnesse a Gal. 3 2. of God because they would establish their owne righteousnes together with the righteousnesse of faith And Phil. 3.7.8 hee affirmeth that although hee were vnrebukeable concerning the Lawe before men yet he did account it as dung that hee might obtaine that righteousnesse which is of God through faith shewing that it is not posible that faith and workes should be set together as parts or causes of righteousnesse 4. The necessitie of maintaining the honour of Christ and of comforting an afflicted conscience in the combat doth require the exclusiue particle onely 5. To the Scripture may bee added the opinion of the fathers for Gennadius the interpreter of Paule saith In his exposition vpon the 3. chapter of the Epistle to the Rom. For righteousnesse is euen to beleeue onely And Ambrose They are iustified freely because working nothing neither doing asmuch againe they are iustified by faith alone VVhat then is it that the particle onely or alone doth exclude in that sentence wherein wee are said to be iustified only by faith or by faith alone Not the causes concurring which are without vs but onely the causes of the same kinde and rancke with it selfe which are within vs that is to say not the grace or mercie of God that iustifieth nor the merit of Christs death which is imputed vnto vs for righteousnesse but only the workes or qualities of vs our selues and of the saints Wel therfore is it said that faith alone iustifieth because it is the onely instrument sole facultie in vs by which we receiue the righteousnesse of Christ So God iustifieth as the efficient cause Christ by his obedience as the meritorious cause faith alone as the instrumentall cause But vvhy doth Paule adde Rom. 4.6 VVithout the vvorkes of the Lavve Not because hee would not haue them perswaded but as denying them to be causes of mans Iustification But what vvorkes are they that Paule doth here exclude 1. Not onely ceremoniall workes as our aduersaries would haue it but euen morall workes also as appeareth by those sentences which hee alledgeth for the proofe of his assertion By the workes of the Lavv shall no flesh be iustified because by the Law came the knowledge of sinne Rom. 3.20 and therefore not righteousnesse And. Rom. 4.15 The Law causeth wrath inasmuch as no man is able to performe it and therefore it causeth not righteousnesse And Rom. 7.7 out of the Decalogue or morall Law hee citeth the tenth commaundement I had not knowne lust to be sinne if the Law had not said Thou shalt not lust Gal. 3.10 Cursed is euery one that abideth not in all things that are written in the booke of the Law to doe them And vers 12. The man which doth these things shall liue in them 2. The Apostle doth not only exclude those morall workes as the same our aduersaries would make vs beleeue which men as yet not regenerate do performe literally or by the meere light of nature without the grace of Christ inasmuch as the man vnregenerate being out of Christ can neuer do any thing well but the Apostle excludeth also euen the good works of the very regenerate men or the works of grace or those that proceed from faith For Abraham who is registred as an vniuersall patterne of all Iustified men was both iustified and regenerate when he performed those good workes for the which he obtained praise with men But with God he was not iustified but when he had many yeares excelled in holinesse of life God imputed only his faith vnto him for righteousnes Rom. 4.2.3 Neither doth the Prophet Habacuck speake of the faithles but of the faithful when he saith Chap. 2. vers 4. The iust shall liue by his faith And Dauid after he was regenerate cryeth out of himselfe and of other godly men Psal 32.1 Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiuen And Psal 143.2 Enter not into iudgement vvith thy seruant O Lord for in thy sight shall no man liuing be iustified Yea and the Apostle himselfe 1. Cor. 4.4 I know nothing by my selfe yet am I not thereby iustified And no maruell for that indeede good workes are the effectes of Iustification and not the causes thereof 3. Our good workes are fewe imperfect and alwaies polluted and stained with some blemishes and spots that they receiue from vs. Esay 64.6 And 1. King 8.46 There is no iust man vvhich doth good and sinneth not For seing the forme of inherent righteousnesse is not thoroughly let in because after the sence of our aduersaries Iustification consisteth in motion it followeth that the contrarie qualitie which is sinne is not thoroughly let out and shaken off and so in that which is imperfect the reliques of sin do stil remaine And whereas Bellarmine maketh inherent righteousnesse to be perfect in respect of the habite and imperfect in respect of the action it is but a fond deuise of his owne braine for in truthe the perfection and imperfection of the action dependeth vpon the perfection and imperfection of the habite according to that of the Philosopher The best habit hath the best action Yea euen our former righteousnesse is put out of remembrance by our later sinnes Ezek. 18.24 4 Saint Iames saith Chap. 2. verse 10. He that faileth in one point is guiltie of all that is to say he is iustlie and worthily condēned of the breach of the lawe in generall for that he that breaketh one title hath offended against the Maiestie of the law giuer Whereupon commeth this rule The whole law is one copulatiue and that the breach of one commaundement draweth with it the
neglect and contempt of both tables yea and of the lawgiuer himselfe because there is but one and the same lawgiuer of all the precepts and the bodie of the law is entire and vnseperable 5 The person is not accepted and taken into Gods fauour for the workes sake but on the contrarie the works doe then please god when the person hath firste found grace and fauour in Gods sight And for this cause it is that it is written Gen. 4.4 that god had respect vnto Abell and his sacrifice And Hebrevv 11.4 By faith Abell offered vnto God a greater Sacrifice then Cain 6 Saint Paul 2. Cor. 5.18 testifieth that the preaching of free reconciliation with god is perpetuall in the Church so that the faithfull to the end of this life haue no other righteousnesse then that which is there described VVhy then doth Saint Iames Chap. 2 verse 21. say that Abraham vvas Iustified by vvorkes Because he speaketh not there of the cause but of the effect whereby iustification may be discerned For when Abraham had offered Isack his sonne vpon the alter he was Iustified through workes saith he that is he was found to be iustified euen before that time by faith that by his works as testimonies of his iustification And so a man is iustified by workes that is by the holinesse of his life he is approued to be such a person as is iustified by the obediēce of Christ which holinesse doth follow iustificatiō as an effect therfore is also a testimonie witnesse of the same After this sort also god is said at the latter day that he wil iustifie his elect by their workes For whereas there are two beginnings of things one of existence the other of knowledge Faith as the beginning of Existence causeth vs to bee iust and workes as the beginning of knovvledge make vs to be knowne to bee iust And therefore the Lord at the last day will propound the beginning of knowledge of the righteousnesse by faith which shall appeare in the eyes of all creatures Mat. 25.34 Come yee blessed of my father c. For I was an hungred and yee gaue mee meat c. VVhat vvas the state of the Question concerning Iustification in Saint Paules time or vvhereof was the controuersie in old time Of the efficient and meritorious cause of Iustification namely whether it were the satisfaction of Christ apprehended by faith or else our workes And the reliques of that controuersie remaine yet in poperie For although the subtiller sort of Papists doe ascribe the beginning of iustification that is the first iustification as they call it onely to the merit of Christ yet the progresse and proceeding in iustification which they call the second iustification that they attribute to the merit of workes But now by the subtiltie of the diuill the whole nature of iustification is called into question For indeede in the Apostles time the question was not whether iustification were a naturall motion as it were from inherent vnrighteousnesse to inheren◠righteousnesse or whether iustifycation were seated in the sentence of the Iudge pronounced which is the question at this day but the state of the question thē was whether iustifycation placed in the sentence of the iudge pronounced vpon the guiltie person were in regard of workes or by reason of Christ By vvhat arguments or reasons doth the Apostle Paule take avvay from workes the cause of Iustification 1. Because wee are all sinners and from an impure nature it cannot be that there should proceede pure and perfect obedience toward God to whom nothing is acceptable vnlesse it be euery way sound absolute not spotted or stained with any corruption which neuer yet could nor euer shal be found in any man 2. Because the Scripture pronounceth that there is no man righteous by the works of the Law no not one And this sentence remaineth euer firme and stedfast Cursed is euerie one that abideth not in all things that are vvritten in the booke of the Law to doe them Gal. 3.10 But there is no man no not the holiest man that euer was that could satisfie the whole law of God as appeareth by the complaint of the Apostle Paule Rom. 7. 3. Because if righteousnesse be by the Law then Christ dyed in vaine Gal. 2.21 and. 5.2 4. Because God will haue no man to glorie in himselfe Least anie man should boast Eph. 2.8.9 Rom. 3.26.27 5. Because by the Law came the knowledge of sinne and the Law causeth wrath that is to say it denounceth death and Iudgement against them that doe not performe perfect obedience in their works and actions a Rom. 4.15 6. Bec use the law was giuen after the promise of iustification and life eternall b Gal. 3.17 7. Because the inheritance or life euerlasting is of free gift and not of merit c Ro. 6 23 Gal. 3.18 Eph. 2 8 8. Because all our sufferings are not worthy of the glorie which shal be reuealed shewed vnto vs therfore our actions are not worthy of it Rom. 8.18 And 2. Cor. 4.20 Our light affliction which is but for a moment causeth vnto vs a farre more excellent and an eternall weight of glorie By what arguments doth the Apostle confirme the righousnesse of faith 1. Because it alone hath the witnesse of the Law Prophets d Ro. 3 21 Gen 3.15 22 28 the end of the Law was Christ Ro. 10.4 Circumcision was the Seale of the righteousnes of Faith Ro 4.11 The Sacrifices Ceremonies did prefigure Christ the righteousnesse which is by faith Haba 2.4 The iust shall liue by his Faith Psa 32.1 Blessed are they vvhose iniquities are forgiuen And on the contrarie Psal 132.2 In thy sight shall no flesh be iustified namely by the obedience of the Law Act. 10.43 To Christ giue all the Prophets vvitnesse that through his name all that beleeue in him shall receiue remission of sinnes 2. From the comparison of like and equall things because Abraham the father of the faithfull in the example and excellencie of faith was iustified by faith e Gen 15 6. Ro. 4.13 14. and not by the Law Now God is alwaies like himself and the case is alwaies alike of the beleeuing father and the beleeuing children 3. Because saluation is not promised vnto him that fulfilleth the Law for that were a vaine promise and so our saluation alwaies doubtfull and vncertaine because no man doth fulfill the law and wee our selues should be also vncertaine whether wee had sufficient good workes for the attaining of this righteousnesse but it is promised to the beleeuer Therefore the inheritance is by faith that it might come by grace and the promise might be sure as relying wholy vpon mercie for that which proceedeth from the grace and fauour of God through Christ is firme and stedfast but so is not that which proceedeth from vs and from our workes Rom. 4.16 4. By an argument of the like
renued by the spirit of GOD not as it is of nature and the law of sinne and the inner man is renued daily and the flesh striueth against the spirit so long as wee carie this mortall bodie about vs as the Apostle witnesseth Rom. 7.23 I see another law in my members rebelling against the law of my minde Therefore seeing the naturall faculties of our soule which are the nearest causes of humane actions are not altogether spirituall and regenerate neyther the flesh that is the corruption of nature is not fully wiped away of them neyther is the faith perfect neyther the spirit and the flesh although distinct yet haue their seuerall seates and abode in vs or worke a sunder seuerally but mixtly It followeth that there is no work of any regenerate man though neuer so excellent which is fully pure or in euerie part thereof is pure from all defilement of the flesh and in some other part altogether vicious and is not wholy mixed with something of the flesh although comparatiuely it be to be iudged a good worke wherein the spirit resisting the flesh doth preuaile as they are euill workes wherein the flesh doth ouercome whereupon Paule saith of himselfe being regenerate I doe not the good that I would but the euill vvhich I vvould not that I doe Rom. 7.19 Hovv then are they said to be perfect a Gen. 6.9 Psal 7.9 Luk 1.6 And easie to all that be borne anevv b mat 11.30 Not because of the perfection of degrees that is the extreme rigour of the law requiring perfect fulfilling thereof in the highest degree but first for the perfection of the parties that is the integritie of obedience conformed according to all the commandements of God and not some onely 2 Because of the synceritie of the heart being void of counterfaiting and hypocrisie 3 Because of the presence of Christs spirit wherewith the regenerate are led a Rom. 8.1.2 4 Also by grace wherby they be deliuered from the curse of the law 5 Lastly because of faith vvhereby all that is borne of God ouercommeth the vvorld 1. Iohn 5.4.5 Seeing that vvhich is good onely in part cannot satisfie the lavv of God and therfore that cannot please God vvhich hath the least imperfection in it hovv then doe the good vvorks of the regenerate please God Not by reason of the worthines of the worke in it selfe or for the excellency order or condition of the man for they are altogether vnworthie in themselues to appeare in the sight of God because they are not the fulfilling of the law But 1 by meanes of the person by faith reconciled accepted and pleasing God and iust thorow Câ—rist euen as Gen. 4.4 The Lord had respect to Abell and to his sacrifice but to Cain and his sacrifice he had no regard And Hebr. 11.5 The person of Enoch pleased God and therefore his works also and because the person pleaseth GOD by faith they are imputed vnto righteousnesse that is they are esteemed as iust as it is written of the zeale of Phinebes when hee thrust thorow the fornicators b ps 106.33 2 They please God because they are brought into light into the sight of God with the couering and vaile of the merite and most perfect righteousnes of Christ applied by faith wherewith the blemishes and defects of our good works are couered 3 Because God doth mercifully approue and crowne them not as they are in themselues but as the works of his owne spirit in vs and as the testimonies of our faith 4 So farre forth as he doth consider them not as they are in themselues but as they are presented in the obedience of Christ our Mediatour in whom being most seuerely punished and in his bloud purged he beholdeth all those things which did make discord betweene vs and him 5 Our obedience being but begun doth please God as it were in the children of obedience not of themselues or their owne worthines but thorow Christ according to that 1. Pet. 2.5 Offer vp spirituall sacrifices acceptable to God thorow Christ For which cause also the regenerate are sometimes called perfect a gen 17 1 Saints and vndefiled in the way b psa 119.1 Iust without rebuke vnblameable vnreproueable c Luk. 1.6 1 Not legally but euangelically not simply and absolutely but by way of comparison or comparatiuely namely so as perfect are opposed to rude 2 By imputation because the person is accompted iust holy vnblameable perfect before God thorow Christ 3 Also inchoatiuely because the new life is begun in them 4 In affection not in action I say in affection vnto godlines not in the perfect action of godlines in the sight God vnlesse it be by imputation VVhat are the Adiuncts or the appurtenances of vvorks There be two merit and recompence or reward VVhat is merit In generall it is an accident of workes which respecteth eyther the reward of a good deed or the punishment of an euill deed Hovv manifold is merite Two fold the merit of punishment which is vsually called the guiltinesse or binding ouer to punishment and the merite of reward which retayneth the generall name of merite and it is a dutie or good turne not due profitable for him to whom it is performed and which doth respect a iust recompence or reward a Ro 47 VVhat is recompence It is the fruit which is giuen to him that worketh for his work and respecteth the desert and by another name it is called vvages and it is double eyther rewarde or punishment VVhat is the proper adiunct of wages Due or debt for wages properly is nothing else but that which is giuen of due or debt for that which is giuen is generall but it is restrained as it were by these differences Grace and debt For that which is giuen is giuen eyther of fauour and is a free gift or else it is giuen of debt and is wages properly so called but in generall wages is vsed for that which is giuen whether it be giuen of fauour or of debt And so there is a double reward or wages one is due the other is not due or freely giuen as it appeareth Rom. 4.4 To him that worketh the wages is counted not of fauour but of debt Whereby it is gathered that by the name of wages is signified in the Scriptures euen a free gift For that which is called Math. 5.46 VVages Luke 6.32 is called fauour or free gift So as the schoolemen doe vainely dreame of a mutuall relation betweene merite wages out of Math. 6.1 For that reward alone which is due of debt doth put on the merit of works but that which is not due debt or free doth not And we doe freely confesse the good works of iust men haue a most liberall remuneration or recompense both in this life and also in the life to come but by fauour not of debt What is debt It is that which a man is bound to pay and it
shining in a darke place and obeyeth the chiefe rule of the holy spirit 2. Pet. 1.19 She can neuer erre in points absolutely necessarie vnto saluation or from the truth simply necessarie and that because truth dwelleth no where else in the world but in her onely For which cause so considered Paule calleth the Church The pillar and ground of truth namely in respect of other congregations who are buried in falshood 1. Tim. 3.15 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So then not simply but in some certaine manner and condition the Church erreth not in matters necessarie vnto saluation but in vnnecessarie things it may erre Iohn 16.13 The holy Ghost will teach you all truth that is all that is necessarie vnto saluation And in this sense Christ prayed for his Church that it might bee sanctified in the truth not that it might not erre in no point but that it might not erre in necessary points b Iohn 17 17 And surely the Church is to be heard according to that saying of Christ a Mat. 244 Luk. 10.16 He which heareth you heareth me but yet so that she heare Christ before she require that her selfe be heard of others But if the Church be not considered vniuersally or totally but particulerly or according to the members thereof surely it may doth come to passe that some particuler visible Churches yea many in number by not vnderstanding a right or by not firmely beleeuing those things which are prescribed by God may erre from the truth eyther in part while they fall into most grieuous errours or else vtterly may depart for euer And this I grant doth happen so much the rather if the bodies of particuler Churches be respected seuerally by reason of the weakenesse of mans disposition men consisting of flesh and bloud of whom it is said Rom. 3.4 Euerie man is a lier sinne also being still inherent in the Godly during this life and God likewise often giuing an efficacie to the Spirit of errour men so deseruing yet so as the Elect may not alwaies persist in errour but being better instructed may returne into the way againe a Mat. 24.24 Isay 42.19 The Lord saith Who is blinde but my seruant and deafe but my messenger whom I sent Dan. 9.12 Speaking of the Church of the people of God saith All Israell haue transgressed thy law 1. Cor. 13.9 We know in part and we prophesie in part The Prophet Dauid Psal 25.7 saith Remember not O Lord mine ignorance The Church of the Iewes erred and the Apostles themselues about the calling of the Gentiles Therefore was Peter warned that he should goe vnto Cornelius and doubt nothing b Act. 10.20 11.2 19. Peter himselfe erred concerning the obseruation of the ceremoniall law while he still beleeued some meats to be vncleane c Act. 10.14 15. he erred also in playing the hypocrite with some other Iewes d Gal 11 13. And againe the Iewish Church erred in being zealous for Moses lawe e Act. 21.20 So did the Church of the Galathians which receiued Circumcision And the Corinthians in the abuse of the Lords Supper and because there were schismes among them f Gal. 1 16 And the Church at Constantinople erred g 1. Cor. 11.18 therefore why might not the Church of Rome erre also For Paule saith that Antichrist shall shall sit in the Temple of God and shall accomplish the mysterie of iniquitie 2. Thes 2.4 In Lib. ad Solitariam vitā agentes And Liberius the Romane Bishop subscribed vnto Arrianisme as Athanasius witnesseth For that which Christ spake vnto Peter Luk 22.32 I haue praied for thee that thy faith should not faile .1 It belongeth onely vnto Peter who was to be assailed with a most perilous tentation in regard of the rest and not vnto his successours And he meaneth a iustifying faith of the heart not of the mouth not an historicall faith which holdeth onely a true opinion of Doctrine For if Christ requested this for al the Romane Bishops namely that they might not erre then hath he not obtained that which he asked for it is manifest that many Romane Bishops haue erred 2. Also that saying nothing appertaineth to the church of Rome but that happely we say that heerein it agreeth with Peter in that it hath denied Christ vnlesse it imitate Peters teares and repentance Neither is it a fitt reasoning from the faith of Peter which was a personall gift to the faith of the church of Rome Neither did Christ himselfe pray for the Apostles onely but for all them who through their wordes shall belieue on Christ Iohn 17 20. Although the Papists affirme The law shall not perish from the Priest nor councell from the wise nor the word from the Prophet Ier. 18.18 yet Ieremiah 7.4 heard the voice of the lord saying Trust not in lying wordes saying the Temple of the lord the Temple of the lord for this is the Nation which hath not heard the voice of their Lord nor receiued his discipline Zeph. 3.2 May the Godly by reason of some mens vices and euill manners seuer themselues from the outward congregation of those that professe the doctrine of Christ No vnlesse they be cast out of the greater part by force for the Prophets haue euer had amongst their auditours some euill ones yet haue they not departed from them And Christ suffered Iudas to the very vttermost in his owne company Math. 13.29 The goodman of the house doth not suffer the darnell or cockell to be pulled vp least it hurt the wheat and it is certaine that there will neuer be in this world so syncere and perfect a church but there may be found chaff and tares mingled with the wheat Verse 24.47 What are the conditions of the church 1 The crosse is a certaine marke or token by which the Lord will haue all those that are his to be marked that they may be conformeable to the Image of his sonne a Rom 8 28 2 Tim. 3 12 yet is it not a perpetuall marke of the church but is rather to be termed a condition thereof then a note or marke 2 That as long as it soiourneth in this world it hath some euill mingled among manie good and sincere men which thing Christ teacheth in the parables of the tares and the drag-net b Math. 13 24.47 3 That although it be clensed by the blood of Christ so that it is without spott or wrincle c Ephes 5 27 both by the imputation of Christs merit as also for the endeauour whereby it aspireth vnto that state yet is it still subiect to many vices and infirmities of the flesh remaining whereunto all the faithfull are apt and prone so that they haue need perpetually of this praier Forgiue vs our trespasses What Epithites are attributed to the church on earth 1 It is called by a metaphor and similitude the Mother of the faithfull Gal. 4.26 bicause the church bringeth forth sonnes vnto
or to be vsed and obserued in writing those lawes and humane traditions 1 That they be not repugnant to the analogy of faith or that they lead vs not from Christ or be superstitious of which sort for the most part the popish rites are neither must our consciences be intangled as though those lawes of order and decency be for that cause onely brought in as if they were parts of diuine worship 2 That they be not preferred before the heauenly doctrine which the Apostles receiuing from God haue deliuered neiâ—â—â—â— must those lawes be eternall or immutable but as necessitie shall require mutable 3 That those things which are vnprofitable ridiculous foolish parasitical and operatiue should not be appointed for a graue honest and profitable order such as those which the Papacie doth commaund of Auricular confession the difference of meates daies and apparell vowed peregrination and the like 4 That the Church be not burdened with the multitude of those precepts as is done in poperie and the true and pure worship of God be oppressed as it was once done of the Pharisies b Mat. 23.4 and so the commaundements of God be made void in respect of men c Mat 15.3 Mar. 7.13 Act. 15.10 That they doe not degenerate into superstition or impietie that there be no merit ascribed to them or worship or necessitie that is they may not be accounted necessarie to saluation or a part of Gods worship and that of themselues by the work done as they speake which if it come to passe let them presently be reformed or altogether abolished by the example of Ezechias which brake in peeces the brasen Serpent d 2. Reg. 18 4 and lastly we must beware least through a pretence of indifferencie they offer poyson and hide a deadly hooke vnder a hony bayte VVho can ratifie or abolish those lawes In particuler Churches the Pastors by the sage iudgement of the Consistory and the authority of the Christian magistrate his consent being thereunto adioyned lastly the flocke being certified therof approouing the same who verily ought not rashly to forsake the opinion of their Pastors and superintendents being confirmed by the word of God sound reasons but in prouinciall Churches it is the office of the Synods being lawfully called in the Lord to constitute such kind of lawes VVhat is a lawfull Synode It is an assembly or meeting and councill either of certain places that is named A prouinciall Synod or else of the whole Church and so it is called Oecumenicall or vniuersall represented by certaine choise persons of her selfe for a certaine time as Pastors and gouernours being remoued as well from all popular gouernment as from smal gouernment and especially from Antichristian â—yrannie that they may expell the wolues and compose all controuersies which are raised in the Church out of the word of God prouided that it be alwaies their rule that they may maintaine pure doctrine and appoint such an outward cutaxie and goood order as seemeth most expedient for the whole Church a Act 15.2.6 c And of such Synods there is great profit 1. Because that which is sought of many is with greater facility obtained 2 Because errors heretiks patrons of errors are more easily repressed and condemned by common consent and iudgement of many By whom are Synods to be called and appoynted By the chiefe Magistrate if hee bee faithfull or at least if he tolerate the Christian faith who also eyther by himselfe or by others whom he hath made choyse of ought to be president of the Synode For it is the office of the Magistrate as the nurce of the Church to preserue the peace and quiet thereof but so that he doth submit himselfe to the word explaned by the mouth of the minister but if hee bee an infidel then it is the office of the Pastors to haue regard as much as in them lyeth that the Church of Christ be no whit damnified and mutually to stirre vp each other that by a common consent they may meete in the name of the Church without any prerogatiue of places to choose those who are knowne to excell in doctrine integritie of life and other gifts of the holy Ghost the Laitie being not excluded as it is manifest out of the Acts. Chap. 15.2 22.23.25 but especially that as Chrst did sit b Luk. 2.46 in the midst of the doctors so now he must be present and beare rule in the councel of the doctors Are all things which Synods decree to be accounted alwaies for true and vndoubted They are not as it is apparant by the second Nicene Councell which did determine against the word of God for the worshipping of Idols and the second Councell holden at Ephesus where the heresie of Eutiches preuailed and the Aphrican Councels where Cyprian was where it was established that those which were baptized by hereticks should be rebaptized for the Church on earth may erre yea being gathered together as it is euident out of Esay 56.10 Ier. 6.13 a Exod. 22.25 1 Reg. 22.6 22 Mar 12.29 Ioh. 11.2 47 2 Thess 2.4.11 the reason is because the Church on earth is not composed of the blessed Angesl but of men whose propertie it is to erre and to be deceiued for that which is said Psal 89.6 that the truth of God is in the congregation of his saints it is to be vnderstood either of the holy Angels liuing in heauen or els of the church where the pure preaching of the gospel souÌ„deth Is there any authoritie of the Synods There is but that which doth depend on the word of God namely which is of Christs promise Mat. 18 2â— where two or three so more be gathered together in my name there am I in the the midst of them neither is it to be doubted but that much more some vniuersall company he doth gouern by his spirit b Act. 15 2â— Cor. 5.4 Therfore the iudgments of Synods are not to be despised especially of those where Christ doth sit in the middest but withall obserue by what condition Christ is in the middest of a councell if it be gathered together in his name and the scripture bee in the most eminent place for then the definition of the councils concerning that opinion which is controuersed after lawfull examination and iust inquiry hath his waighâ— which notwithstanding it selfe must be tried by the touchstone of the scripture according to that try all things keepe that which is good 1. Thess 5.21 Doth not the Apostle commaÌ„d vs to obey rulers gouernors He. 13.17 Yes verily but both with an implicite condition if they be true rulers let not the word of God the volume of the law depart froÌ„ their mouths c Ios 1.7.8 if they sit in Moses chaire that is they teach the doctrine of Moses incorruptly d Mat. 23.2 in those things which are peculier to their ministery as in the word of God lawfull
the common discipline What is peculiar discipline It is proper to the clergie or ministers of the church whereby they are kept in their duety whereof there be three partes the first is 1 Prohibition prescribed by the cannons which the auncient Bishops haue imposed vpon themselues and to their order such are 1 that no clergy man shall spend his time in hunting dicing or bancketing 2. that such shall not be vsurers or Merchants 3 That they be not present at dauncings or such like but in the church each minister shall by preaching prayer and the administration of the sacraments diligently doe his duety The seconde is execution which was especiallie committed to the Bishops who to that purpose did twise or oftner in the yeare call prouinciall synods in which as well Bishops themselues as other clergy men were censured The third is the punishing of Ministers whereof there were those degrees Reprehension Translation deposition and keeping from the communion What vse is there of ecclesiasticall gouernment It is 1. as a bridle to curbe and tame such as spurne against the doctrine of Christ 2 it is a spurre to such as are dull 3. It is a rodd wherewith they that haue more greeuously offended are in compassion and according to the milde spirit of Christ chastised of the church What is contrarie to this doctrine 1 The peeuishnes of the Donatists and Anabaptists who vnder pretence of a more austere discipline acknowledge no congregation of Christ but such an one as is each way conspicuous for Angelicall prefection for want whereof they by an impious scisme doe deuide themselues from the flocke of Christ 2 The abuse of excommunication an example whereof we haue in Diotrephes * 3 Ioh 12 who desired preheminence in the church and cast out such as he liked not 3 That Tirannicall authoritie which Popes and papall prelats do challenge to themselues in their Iurisdiction to wit a iudgment to determine both of the greater and lesse excommunication which is nothing else but a power to excomunicate 4 Their error who either bring into the church an Oligarchie one the one parte or an vniuersalitie for the whole church on the other by which they would haue this Iurisdiction executed and thinke that with euerie thing the whole church should be acquainted abusing for this purpose Math. 18.17 Tell the church and. 1. Cor. 5.4 when ye are gathered c 5 That foolish and ridiculous excommunication vsed by Papists of Locusts mise Eeles flees c. To the apparent abuse of the churches power as also that they excommunicate men for the profession of Christ not paying of debte contempt of the popes decrees or legacies to monkes 6 Their error who doe attribute the partes of this gouernment to the christian magistrate either in binding or loosing As also their error who where there is a christian magistrate will haue him to haue nothing to doe with those ecclesiasticall censures and with these the neglect of such gouernours as punish not offenders 7 Of the papists which bring causes meerely ciuill to the ecclesiasticall courts 8 The superstitious and toyish Popish fasts whereas what dayes we shall fast or not fast as Augustine saith neither Christ nor his Apostles haue determined 9 All lawes for choice of meates forbidding some as flesh butter cheese egs etc. Wherein consisteth the fast of papists For in that the Apostle saith it is good not to eat flesh c. Rom. 14.21 he that is weake eateth hearbes he speaketh not this simplie for theÌ„ should he contrarie himselfe and Christ but as it is vsed with offence to the weake He then speaketh of such weake Iewes who for feare least they should in the market light vpon some such meat as Moses had forbidden rather would eat hearbes then buy meat in the shambles yet Christ would not haue his disciples to follow the austerecourse of Iohn Baptists life and diet but sheweth that it belonged to the age of the old testament and in no sorte to be practised in the libertie of the new b. b Mat. 9.15 16 10 These sacrilegious opinions of meriting Gods fauour of appeasing his wrath satisfieing for sinnes and deliuerance from purgatorie by fastings duly obserued All which if they were true doubtles Christ died in vaine Gal. 2.21 For they grant indeed that man of himselfe can not render vnto God any thing equiualent for sins but yet they vrge that it with Gods acceptation and by communication of Christs merit they may 11 The decrees of the ancient hereticks called Esses made vnder colour of wisedome worship and humilitie that men should not taste certaine meates and should vse such immoderate abstinence as would hurt the bodie contratie to that Coloss 2 21. 12 The Heresie of the Marcionites and the Tatians of Encratites in english we may call them contineÌ„ts which taught men to despise the workes of the creator and Carthusians who will eat no flâ—sh The Seuerians who will drinke no wine Montanus his Xerophagie that is eating of dry meat to demerit gods fauour to purg away originall sin increase in vertue to get a great rewarde 13 The error of such as allow no fasts at all but being led on by the gourmandizing spirit of surfetting dronkeÌ„nes become belly-gods 14 The dissolute life of the Romish Clergie all which to haue repeated is a sufficient refutation The fiue and fortieth common Place Of Vowes VVhat is called a Vow SOme will haue it called votum that is to say a vow a voluntate that is from the will as it were proceeding from will aduisednes or purpose It is called of the Greecians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 21.23 VVe haue foure men vvhich haue made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a vow And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a promise of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to promise because he which maketh a promise saith Eustathius that is he which hath vowed any thing hath laid a burthen vpon himselfe so that a vow is some voluntary thing which euen vpon a deliberate purpose or free will some man hath vndertaken 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it were a burthen vpon himselfe As euerie man vvisheth in his heart so let him giue not grudginglie or of necessitie for God loueth a cheerefull giuer 2 Cor. 9.7 And so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth a vowe not onely a prayer and a desire of obtaining something but a promise of offering something to God but yet let the vowe be agreeing with the prescript or rule of the Law For the scripture doth call a vowe not euerie promise which may be made to euerie man but onely that which is made to God and that willingly religiously therefore that which among men is called a promise in respect of god is termed a vowe for a promise made to a man hath not the manner of a vow Sometime metonymicallie it signifieth a thing promised with a vow a Psal 66 13. and
comprehendeth the office of the Magistrate For God will iudge and punish them either immediately without the ministerie of man or mediately by the Magistrate Doth Paule condemne the order of Iudgements and all manner of contending at the Lawe where hee saith 1. Cor. 6.7 There is vtterly a fault amongst you because you goe to Lawe one with another No neither doth he simply deny the lawfulnesse of going to law before a magistrate but onely rebuketh in Christians that goe to lawe with another that same 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is lesse then 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth weaknesse or defect and impatiency of minde 1. That they laboured with lust sorrowe hatred and couetousnesse euen for vnprofitable matters and for trifling businesses and would contend in lawe for the most slender iniuries that might be and would deale therin with an obstinate purpose of reuenge and with all the sleights and deuises that could bee 2. In regard of the scandall and offence because they did striue and goe to lawe vnder the heathen and vnbeleeuing Iudges which brought a reproach vpon the whole Church as if Christians should at this day bring their actions before Turkish gouernours 3. Because they did willingly offer iniurie and damage one vnto another euen those that were brethren and partakers in the same Christian Religion 4. Lastly that they neglected to compound their differences by the arbiterment of the faithfull in the Church But that a man may euen before wicked Iudges defend his owne innocencie against the iniuries of wicked men euen himselfe giuing the first onset the Apostle Paule sheweth not onely in words but in deed in practise when he appealed to the lawes of the Romaines when hee was beaten with rods and so also he required helpe of the Romane tribune against the Iewes that lay in wait to kil him again from the vniust Iudge he appealed to the tribunall seate of Caesar a Act. 16 37 23.27 25.10.11 By all with it appeareth that to goe to lawe of it selfe is not euill but the abuse is that that maketh it vicious What doth Christ meane then Math. 5.39 when hee forbiddeth them to resist euill and commaundeth them that to him that will take away their coate they should giue the cloake also and to turne the right cheek to him that shall strike them on the left It is not an aduise and counsell giuen to them that are come to perfection as some expound it but a manifest and expresse commaundement wherein he doth not absolutely enioyne them to turne the other cheeke to him that smites them for Christ himselfe did not so to him that smote him but rather reprehendeth his malapertnes Iohn 18.22 And so Paule Act. 23.2 God will smite thee thou painted wall But the meaning of Christ is that he would haue the mindes of his Disciples to bee so farre from the desire of reuenging of iniuries that they should rather endure the iniurie to be doubled vpon them then they should reuenge the same and that they should rather be willing to suffer wrong then to offer any or requite it being offered to them But it is one thing to defend themselues and their goods which is lawfull for Gods children to doe and it is another thing to hurt another man which the godly may not doe Neyther yet is this patience which Christ prescribeth Luke 21 19. or equitie and moderation of the minde any hinderance but that keeping still sound friendship toward our aduersaries wee may without bitternes of hatred or desire to hurt them vse the remedie granted vnto vs by God that is to say the helpe of the magistrate for the preseruation of our goods and substance and let the causes contend and striue so as still the hearts may be free from contention for according to the old saying Dissidere bonos etiam de rebus iisdem Incolumi licuit semper amicitia The selfesame things may make good men to varie And yet still friendship stand and not miscarie Or they may in a care of the publicke good and in pure and true zeale bring before the magistrate a guiltie stubborne and pestilent fellow and require to haue him punished so as it bee done with an vpright conscience and a minde free from all guile and corrupt affection ayming at the amendement or at leest the bridling and restrayning of the offender the quietnesse of others the preseruation of iustice and Gods glorie What say you to that of Salomon Prou. 10.12 Loue couereth all trespasses Doth that speach commaund the Magistrate to spare those that offend or doth it commaund priuate men that they shall not bring their complaints before the magistrate against those that doe them iniurie No But it teacheth that priuate offences such as vsually fall out among men must be fauourably intepreted forgiuen and forgotten according to that forgiue and ye shall be forgiuen and as Paule saith Loue suffereth all things namely those which are not enormious but may be tolerated and mitigated without breach of discipline or godlinesse 1. Cor. 13.7 In what sort are iudgements to be ordered This point the scripture teacheth Deut. 1.16 First Heare the controuersies betweene your brethren Secondly Iudge rightly betweene euery man and his brother and the stranger that is with him Thirdly Ye shall haue no respect of person in iudgement but shall heare the small aswell as the great ye shall not feare the face of man for the iudgment is Gods And fourthly chap 17.4 If any thing be told thee and thou hast heard it thou shalt inquire of it diligently whether the thing be true and certaine So Leuit. 19.15 Yee shall not doe vniustly in iudgement thou shalt not fauour the person of the poore nor honour the person of the mightie but thou shalt iudge thy neighbour iustly Pro. 17.15 Hee that iustifieth that is acquiteth the wicked and he that condemneth the iust euen they both are abhomination to the Lord. And Pro. 24.24 He that saith to the wicked thou art righteous him shall the people curse and the nations shall abhorre him And Iohn 7.24 Iudge not saith Christ according to the appearance but iudge righteous iudgement as if he should say weigh and consider the fact by it selfe simply without any respect at all to the person And 2. Chron. 19 5. Iosaphat said vnto the Iudges Take heede what you doe for you execute not the iudgements of man but of God That is you doe not in iudgement supply the roome of any man so much as of God himselfe and he will be with you in the cause and iudgement Wherefore now let the feare of the Lord be vpon you take heed and doe it for there is no iniquitie with the Lord our God neither respect of persons nor receiuing of reward And the law of the Athenians was this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Both must be heard and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Giue not thy iudgement any way Till thou hast heard what
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because in respect of the circumstances of the matter it abateth the seueritie of Iustice and moderateth and tempereth the extremitie of the law which the Graecians call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the extremity of law And it is of two sorts 1. Publicke or the Iudges equitie supplying the place of that person wherby he bendeth the law vnto the cause in hand that is he doth not respect 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the extremitie of law but applieth the meaning purpose of the law to the manner of the cause On the contrary the cause is bended to the law when in iudgement the extremity of law is retained and no equity admitted in respect of any circumstances And then Summum Ius summa iniuria Extreame law becomes extreame wrong In this respect it is said Ecclesiastes 7.14 Be not iust ouer much neyther make thy selfe ouer wise And Prouerb 30.33 Hee that wringeth his nose ouermuch causeth bloud to come out Yea the Lord himselfe adddeth exceptions of certaine cases to the extremitie of the law as to the law of manslaughter And lawes are generall and vniuersall rules which doe not presently fit euery particular matter and case in question And therefore they are to receiue a fit interpretation by the industrie of the Iudge In this respect Christ defendeth his disciples for plucking the eares of corne vpon the sabbath day And Dauid for the same reason contrarie to the law did eate of the shew bread a 1 Sam. 21 6 Mat. 12 3 And this is publike equitie or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Priuate equitie or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of euerie priuate man is that which 1. tolerateth the infirmitie of our neighbour 2. It couereth secret faults 3 It interpreteth doubtfull actions or words not to the worst but in the best sence where there appeare no manifest tokens of malice It doth not lay open to the world secret offences but cureth them by Instruction Counsell Admonition and brotherly reproofe Of which we read Phil. 4.5 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let your moderation your equitie your gentlenesse mildnesse and patient minde be knowne to all men 3 The chiefe equitie or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is that of Christ in that hee tooke the punishment of our sinnes and laid it vpon himselfe prayed for his enemies and left pardon and forgiuenes readie for all repentant sinners at what hower soeuer 4 Lastly priuate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or equitie or moderation remitteth ofences yealdeth from his owne right both in defending and reteyning the good and in repelling the euill and in reuenging of iniuries for the peace sake What politicke lawes are to be allowed Those which are agreeable to the law of nature whereof the decalogue is an abridgement and composed for the safetie of the people or those which doe not swarue from the eternall rule of the honouring of God and louing our neighbour and are made by a lawfull magistrate Those that are made after any other manner they are no better then tyrannicall bonds Isa 10.1 What things are there that giue weight and strength to the law 1 The example of the magistrate if he be a liuing law that is if he expresse in his life that which he commaundeth in his lawes for Regis ad exemplum totus componitur orbis The kings example beares such sway That all the people goe that way 2. A care of the keeping of the lawes that they bee not made like spiders webs 3. Equitie in the obseruing of them that Crowes may not bee fauoured and Doues censured that is the wicked spared and the innocent punished 4. The speedie execution of the Lawes Doth the Iudiciall lawe of Moses binde the Christian magistrate No not precisely as it was appropriated to the people of the Iewes during the gouernment of Moses Law For the lawe as the rule is bindeth none but those for whome it was made And The Lawe was giuen for a certaine time and is of no authoritie after that time But it doth binde him so farre forth as it commaundeth equitie and setteth downe punishments for sinne though not the peculier manner of the punishment which is to bee tempered according to the estate of the time place and country It is lawfull therefore for Christians to vse the Lawes of their owne nations beeing agreeable vnto reason Are tythes abolished because the Lawe Ceremoniall is abolished No because the Precept of Tythes was not simply ceremoniall but partly morall imprinted in the rationall nature which teacheth that stipends are due to such as watch for the common good The which the Apostle prooueth by arguments a 1 Cor. 9 taken from the Lawe of nature and the common custome of men saying Who goeth to warre of his owne cost or who planteth a vineyard and eateth not the fruit therof and this Christ confirmed Mat. 10 10. The Labourer is worthy of his hire But the determination of a certaine portion suppose the tenth rather then the seuenth ninth eleuenth or twelfte was a Iudiciall precept which may without sinne and ought to be obserued if it be set downe by the authoritie of the Magistrate What is vnderstoode by this name Subiect The whole multitude of people who are gouerned and the name of a subiect is more generall then the name of a citizen For euery citizen is a subiect to the Soueraine Magistrate but euerie subiect is not a cytizen For hee vpon whome onely burdens and seruices are imposed and not honours that is offices and dignities he in that common wealth in the which he liueth is not a citizen but a subiect but if in the same common wealth in the which he liueth he be partaker both of dignities seruices either in whole or part with the rest who liue vnder the same Lawes hee is a citizen a citizen also one is said to bee either in respect of his country or common wealth in which hee is borne or inrolled but a subiect in respect of the Magistrate Who are the Magistrates subiects All and euery one who liue in his Kingdome of what condition soeuer whether high or lowe politick or Ecclesiasticall persons so euen Aaron the Priest should haue obeyed Moses the ciuill Magistrate a Ex. 4 15 32 21 so the Prophets who when they were ruled by the spirit of God did couragiously constantly perform the office of reprehension cōmitted to them of God yet to their kings princes whom they did reprehend as in was meet they did reuerēce Christ the high Priest our maister did acknowledge the Magistrate and obeyed him in ciuill things b Mat. 17 24.27 the like Paul performed and commaunded Rom. 13.2 Let euery soule Emphatically that is euery man without exception bee subiect to the higher powers Whereupon Chrysostome saith that this commaundement is giuen to all to Priests and to Monks and not onely to Lay people the Apostle in the beginning declareth when hee saith Let euery soule be
him and made not many but one onely wife nor brought diuers but one wife vnto him Also whoredome adulteries detestable sodomy and buggery with beasts do repugne this doctrine Leuit. 18.20 Rom. 1. Leu. 18.20.22.23 20.10.11.12.13 Rom. 1.26.27 Heb 13.4 1. Cor. 7.2 What kind of men may marry Mariage is honorable amongst all men and the bed vndefiled wherefore all sorts of men may marry yea it is necessary and inioyned them which cannot liue continently Let euery man haue his owne wife where the verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 let him haue is commanding not leauing it free Whether is it lawfull for the Ministers of the Church to marrie Yea because God hath made them also fit for marriage and procreation of children Gen. 1.27 2.18.24 Heb. 13.4 and the law of nature alloweth of coniunction betweene male female Secondly because it is holy good and honorable amongst all men and the bed vndefiled For Christ calleth mariage a diuine coniunction and therefore holy when he saith Those whom God hath ioyned together And Paul saith Mariage Mat. 19.6 1. Tim. 4.4.5 1. Cor. 7.14 1. Tim. 2.15 Tit. 1.15 1. Tim. 3.2 Tit. 3.6 meate and such like are sanctified by the word and prayer Also the vnbeleeuing man is sanctified by the beleeuing wife Also the woman is saued by bringing forth children in faith To conclude To the cleane all things are cleane And Paphnutius said in the Nicene Synode that it was chastitie for a man to lie with his owne wife Sozom. lib. 1. cap. 23. Thirdly because a Bishop saith the Apostle of the Gentiles must be vnreproueable the husband of one wife not of one Church as the Romanists say for the Apostle speakes not in that place of the Bishops office but of the qualitie of his persoÌ„ nor forbids him to marry any other if his first wife die for he that marieth a second wife after the death of the first is the husbaÌ„d of one wife if he be content with his own wife but he wil haue an honest man to content himself with one wife not to haue two or moe wiues at one time after the maner of the Iewes Gentiles 4. Because the Ministers of the Gospel represent not the Leuiticall priests who yet did not perpetually abstaine from their wiues but onely whilest they serued about the holie things in the Temple for they were types and figures of Christ our Mediator whose more then angelike puritie they ought euery way to represent beyond the custome of men Also when they were to enter into the tabernacle they abstained from wine a Leu. 10.9 from the buriall of the dead b 21.1 and from shauing c vers 5. wherein notwithstanding the Romish priests do not imitate them but yet they that are godly know how to moderate the vse of mariage for a time as also how to possesse their vessels in holiâ—â—sse d 1. Thess 4.4 And that they must sometimes refraine that they may giue themselues to prayer e 1. Cor. 7.5 which yet Paul will not haue to be perpetuall Fiftly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or inuersion because the priests prophets prophetesses Apostles as Peter Philip and others mentioned 1. Cor. 9.5 apostolicke men for Polycrates sonne to Gregorie Nazianzene Bishop of Ephesus saith he was the eight Bishop and sprung from Bishops his auncestors were married f Euseb lib. 5. Eccl. hist Sixtly because Daniel giueth Antichrist this note to rule in the Church not regarding women but defiling the Church with filthie and incestuous lusts g Dan. 11.37 And Paule plainely calleth the Law of being vnmarried in generall a doctrine of diuels h 1. Tim. 4.1 Seuenthly because Christ saith They worship me in vaine teaching for doctrines mens precepts i Mat. 15.9 19.12 willing all men to vse mariage except those whom either nature hath made vnfit or some casualtie made vnable or some speciall grace hath made continent so as that they can liue purely without mariage To all others Christ saith All are not capable hereof saue onely they to whom it is giuen and againe 1. Cor. 7.2 Euery one hath his proper gift one thus another thus And 1. Cor. 12.4 There are diuersitie of gifts which one and the same spirit worketh diuiding to euery one priuatly their proper gift as he will Eightly because the single life of the Romanists aboundeth with prodigious and infamous lusts yea euen amongst those Fathers that would be thought to liue like Curius but yet are Epicures Ninthly out of the Decrees of the third Councell of Carthage holden in the yeare of our Lord 421. in which the heresie of Pelagius was condemned at which Councell Augustine was also present it is plaine that Bishops were married For the twelfth Canon is in effect this We decree that the sonnes or daughters of Bishops or any Cleargie man shall not marrie with heathen people or Heretickes and Scismatickes Whether doth the Apostle 1. Timoth. 5.11 condemne those widowes whose marrying haue made voide their first faith giuen to God to keepe themselues continent This maketh nothing for the Nuns vowes wherin at least is to be obserued that which the Apostle requireth the younger widowes for danger of incontinencie saying ver 14. I would haue the younger to marrie But he teacheth that the younger widowes were not to be admitted vnto the number of the Deacons for that they are vnfit for that office who are tied with the bond of matrimonie But youth did often sollicite the yonger widowes to mariage which they could not contract without some offence and signe of lightnesse What thinke you then of vowes Some are holy and free touching things lawfull and possible and out of Gods word and will but others wicked compelled rash besides and often against Gods word and vndertaken besides the gifts giuen by God The first I thinke are to be obserued but these to be broken l Deut. 23.21 according to the old saying In an ill promise break thy faith in a wicked vowe change thy decree What things repugne this Doctrine The opinion of Pope Syricius and of the Romanists who blasphemously pronouÌ„ce contrary to the Apostle m Heb. 13.4 that mariage is an vncleanenesse pollution of the flesh They forbid the maried holy orders vrging the vowe of perpetual single life and forswearing mariage against the expresse word of God to those that are to bee ordained They call the solemne vowe of continencie an impediment hindring contract in matrimony and breaking the contract made nor that it is lawfull after the solemne vowe such as the Monkes and Nunnes make They say that the single life is an Angelicall kinde of life deseruing remission of sins Whether may a man mary another wife his first wife being dead Hee may First because that saying of God It is not good for man to bee alone n Gen. 2.18 is generall and perpetually true Secondly the Apostle saith
If the man be deade the woman is free from the lawe of her husband o Rom. 7.2.3 so as she is no adulteresse if she be maried to another and 1. Tim. 5.14 Let younger widowes mary and 1. Cor. 7.37 The woman is bound by the law vnto her husband being aliue but if her not first second or third but indefinitely husband be dead she is at libertie to marie another So may a man also by the same lawe Thirdly Abraham the father of all beleeuers maried Cethura after Sarahs death p Gen. 25.1 Fourthly because it is better to mary then to burne q 1. Cor. 7.9 15. and vers 8. 9. he commaundeth the vnmaried and widowes to mary if they cannot liue continently also If the vnbeleeuer will depart let him depart A brother or sister is not subiect in such like things vers 15. VVhat is contrarie to this doctrine The errour of Tertullian Hierome and others who to the end they might condemne second mariages do affirme that mariage is not dissolued no not by death VVhat things are required in the right and lawfull contract of Matrimonie Two things fitnesse which is not so much ro be gathered by the number of yeares as by the ablenesse of the bodie and lawfull consent What is consent It is a will proceeding from a sound and perfect iudgement whereby errour of the person craft drunkennesse foolishnesse parents threats iust feare externall compulsion and such like are excluded from contracting matrimonie all which must bee away to the ende that the will may be sound free and proceeding from a right iudgement So when the parents and brother of Rebecca sate in commission with Abrahams seruant about her mariage they said Call the maid that we may know her willing consent Gen. 24.57 VVhich is a lawfull consent That which agreeth both with the lawe of God and nature and with the honest constitutions of men VVhat doth the law of God and mercie require Honour and obedience toward our parents and shame and reuerence towards our kindred What is the honour due vnto the parents That the children contract not matrimonie without their parents counsell and will First for that the first man Adam tooke not a wife without Gods will and consent a Gen. 2.22 where God is said not only to haue created her but also to haue brought her vnto Adam Secondly because children are not at their ownâ—â—isposing but in their parents power Thirdly for that the Fathers Abraham Isaac b Gen 24.3 4. Iacob c 28.1.12 yea and Ismael d 21.21 though fierce otherwise and Sichem a Gentile e 34.4 shewed that mariage is not to be contracted without the parents consent Fourthly Paule saith Children obey your parents in all things f Eph. 6.1 Col. 3.20 and therefore in that matter of mariage Fiftly God did not ratifie a vow made by children without the parents knowledge or consent g Num. 30.6 much lesse matrimonie made by contract without parents consent Esay married wiues both which grieued and vexed his parents h Gen. 26.34 And the Scripture prescribeth precepts vnto the parents about giuing their children in mariage i Deut. 7.3 Ier. 29.6 1. Cor. 7.37 further Christ saith that the law of honoring parents is violated when the children take the parents goods without their knowledge and offer it vnto God in the temple k Mat. 15.5 How much more is that law violated when children withdraw themselues out of their parents power Which they doe when they contract matrimonie without their parents knowledge or consent But yet the godly Magistrate is to consider whether the parents haue reasonable or else vnreasonable cause to withstand and hinder it What contrarieth this doctrine The opinion of the Papists who do ratifie secret mariages contracted without either the parents knowledge or consent and that their consent is of honestie only and not of necessitie and with such mariages approue of rape when as a maide is taken violently out of her fathers house that after she is defloured she may be takeÌ„ to wife What doth modestie or reuerence towards kindred require That matrimonie be not contracted betweene those of consanguinitie affinitie within those degrees which are forbidden both by Gods law l Leuit. 18.6 and the honest constitution of Princes For such mariages are called vnlawfull and incestuous because they are not approued by publike lawes and ceremonies for the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth the mariage girdle which declared those mariages which were lawfull and publikely approued others which are made against the constitutions of Princes are called vnlawfull What rules are to be obserued in contracting matrimonie God hath propounded three in his law First mariage is forbidden in infinitum in the right line so well ascending as descending because the gâ—â—â—ter or superior in the right line hath alwaies the place of the father in respect of the yonger And the Scripture saith A man shall leaue father and mother and shall cleaue vnto his wife So Iohn cannot marrie his mother grandmother great grandmother c. nor his daughter neece cousin c. So Martha may neither be married to her father grandfather great grandfather nor to his son nephew nor cousin of the son or daughter n Leuit. 18.7.10 2. In the collaterall and equall line that is betweene brothers and sisters onely either of one parent or both ver 9.11 For wheras the first brothers married their sisters it is to be vnderstood of necessitie and by diuine dispensation seeing there were no other women in the world there was a precept of multiplying mankind o Gen. 1.28 3. In the collaterall and vnequall line as thou maist not marrie thy aunt by father or mothers side and so ascending for they are to thee instead of parents and so Martha may not marrie her vncle by the father or mothers side So though for the vncle to marry his brother or sisters daughter be not expressely forbidden yet because à simili from the like the like precepts are deduced thou maist not marrie thy brothers daughter nor his daughters daughter because thou art to them in their parents stead In the 18. of Leuit. see this at large Now for affinitie the law forbiddeth the son to marie his stepmother the father his sonnes wife or his daughter in lawe or her daughter and these are in the right line In the collaterall line the brother cannot marrie his brothers wife his wiues sister his wife liuing nor his fathers brothers wife nor the children of his sonne or daughter in law See Leuit. 18.15.16.17.18 Is this Leuiticall lawe concerning degrees a law ceremoniall or iudiciall or naturall and morall It is naturall and conformable vnto the law of nature and therefore not to be remitted by any but by God onely because euen the Gentiles were obliged and bound vnto it and the Scripture calleth more or lesse all
eternall as Christ saith Iohn 3.3 vnlesse a man be borne againe c. 3 Because faith without which it is impossible for any man to be saued cannot be without good workes and faith hath charitie euer ioyned with her though not in action yet in possibility a Gal. 5.6 4 Because Bernard saith good workes are the way to the kingdome not the cause of raigning Neither can any man attaine to life eternall but by the way of good workes which God hath prepared that wee should walke in them Ephes 1.4 2.10 What is to be obserued in the sayings of the Scriptures vvherein iustification saluation and life eternall is ascribed to workes 1 Legal sentences are to be vnderstoode of perfect good workes such as none can be found in no creature But euangelicall sentences doe alwaies include faith in our workes And we must vnderstand that by faith in the first place iustification is receiued and acceptation to life eternall afterwarde in the second place and by consequence workes are accepted as the fruites of fairh and life eternall is promised to these for Christes sake 2 In such sayings there are not brought forth arguments from the cause why the person is made partaker of eternall life but it is shewed from the effects or the adiuncts what person is partaker of remission of sinnes life eternall So Luk. 7.47 Christ plainely proueth in way of resolution by this argument that the womans sinnes were pardoned because shee loued much But twoe diuerse questions are at no hand to be confounded The one to whom life eternall is giuen the other for what cause it is giuen To them that doe well and meditate in the law of God is happines and life eternall promised a Psal 1.13 119.1.2 Math. 25.3 but yet it is giuen freely for Christes sake b psal 32 1 3 In this question we must remember to obserue a rule of the Rabbines concerning the holy Scriptures In euery place wherein thou lightest on an obiection for an hereticks thou findest a medicine in the side thereof So the scripture wheresoeuer it ascribeth eternall life to workes as a reward calleth it an inheritance c math 25 35. Colloss 3.24 4 When as diuers effects doe depend alike of one and the selfe same cause the consequence from one effect auaileth to another because of their common dependance as Luk. 7.47 the consequence from loue auailes to proue the remission of sinnes because ech of them dependeth on faith 5 Where there is a subiect there is his proprietie and on the contrarie where there is a propriety there is his subiect So where there is faith there be workes and where there be good works there is faith 6 Seeing good workes doe spring from faith whatsoeuer is attributed to them must needs be ascribed to the roote i. faith whence they spring VVhat is the end and vse of good workes It is three fold 1. The glory of God namely that by them wee should glorifie God before men a Mat. 5.16 2 The testification of our true faith that we may make our calling and election sure to our selues in our owne consciences 2. Pet. 1.10 And also that we may liue sutable to the gospell our calling Ephes 4.1 I beseech you walk worthy of the calling wherwith you are called 3 The edification of our neighbour 2 Cor 9 which is done whilest that we further him by our workes or prouoke him to doe the like b 11. 12. 13 Act. 3.14 VVhat is contrarie to this doctrine 1 Euill workes 2 The error of the papists who teach that good workes may be done without faith as also of them that thinke they are perfect which boast of the perfection and purity of workes and securely rest in them Also their error who bragge of their merits of congruity and condignity and boast of the workes of supererogation which teach that their wilworships Numb 15.39 Ezek 20.18 19 Mat. 15.19 that is worships of there owne deuising are acceptable to god Which accompt these for good workes which are done with good intent and leane only on the will and tradition of men which imagine that the violating of these is more hainous then of the commandements of God As for that which is saide that we must heare the guides euen as Christ himselfe d. Luk. 10.16 Heb. 13.17 it must be vnderstood only of the true pastours of the Church which watch for the saluation of the soules committed to their charge And the error of them who affirme that man is iustified before God by workes as causes sclander vs that we contemne good workes as though this were in controuersy betweene vs and them whether good works are to be done wheras we doe more carefully vrge this then they doe 3 Of the Epicures or libertines which neglect good workes as vnprofitable The three and thirtieth common place Of Christian libertie What doe you vnderstand by this name Christian libertie NOT loosenesse or in generall simply euery libertie but in some respect restrained to some certaine kinde and certaine degrees For this Epithite or title Christian or spirituall puts a difference wherby this speciall kind of libertie is discerned from ciuill and bodily libertie and from the counterfeit liberty of other sects Neyther yet is it contrarie to bodily and ciuil libertie a Eph 6.5 1 Cor. 7 22 or to that seruice that we owe to God and to iustice b 1 pet 2.16 Rom. 6.18 1. Cor. 7.22 Hee that is called being free is the seruant of Christ that is he ought to serue Christ Againe whereas we speake of Christian libertie we must put difference betweene the libertie of the will whereof we haue spoken in the common place of freewill and the libertie of the person wherof here we are to intreat In Greeke it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. Cor. 3.17 for where the spirit of the Lord is there is libertie .. In Latine it is called libertas libertie or setting free not that it it is done by force as in old time when the Lord deliuered the people from Pharaoh vnlesse it be in respect of Sathan whose power and kingdome Christ hath destroyed neither is it obtained with the leaue of our enemies as when the people returned out of Babilon but by the full price paid not to Sathan but to God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Apostle calleth the price of our redemption whereby vve are made free How manifold is personall libertie Paul sets it downe to be twofold not in the kinds but in respect of the degrees one whereby Christ hauing paide that endlesse price namely his bloud wee are redeemed that wee might be set free from the slauerie of sinne death and the Law c Ephe. 1.7 Rom. 7.6 which for instruction sake we may call the Redemption of libertie Whereof the Apostle maketh mention Rom. 6.22 Now are wee made free from sinne but are the
seruants of God and 8.2 Christ hath set mee free from the law of sinne and death The other whereby wee shall bee wholy redeemed into full and perfect libertie a Epb 1 14. And this is called the redemption of liberty that is freedome of libertie or of deliuerance And Rom. 8.21 The glorious libertie of the sonnes of God b Luk. 21.28 And the redemption of our bodies Rom. 8.23 Wee may tearme that onely begun this perfect For though wee be made free by the first kinde of liberty yet in some part we are held in some slauerie by the power of sinne so as wee cannot doe that we would c Gal. 5.17 And the seruitude of corruption yea euen death it selfe doth hold vs fettered in her chaines vntill that day of redemption d Eph. 4.30 when Christ shall by his power set vs free being redeemed by himselfe For wee are onely saued by hope Rom. 8.24 and 1. Iohn 3.2 Now are we the sonnes of God free indeed e Mat 5.17.25 but it hath not yet appeared what we shall be but wee knowe that when he shall appeare wee shall bee like vnto him euen as he is Like vnto this shall that our deliuerance be or the restauration of the creature not of the Angels or of euery particuler man but of the frame of the heauens and of the elements whereby it shal be deliuered from the bondage of corruption whereunto now it is subiect into the libertie of the glorie of the sonnes of god that is into that happy estate of incorruption which shal be made manifest when the sonnes of God shal be exalted into glorie For there shal be new heauens and a new earth 2. Pet. 3.13 f 2 pet 3.21 Ro. 8 19.20 21 now in this place we doe especially speake of the first kinde of libertie What is christian libertie It is a spirituall liberty whereby we that truely beleeue are freed and sett at libertie by the bloud of Christ from the slauery of sinne and the tiranny of the deuill 2 From the accusation burthen and curse of the lawe the weight of Gods anger Damnation and eternall death 3 And being indued with the spirit of adoption of libertie illumination we are deliuered from the vaile of the heart that is from the miserable blindenes of error and the bondage of darknesse which was brought vpon vs by Adams sinne lastly from the yoke of the ceremonies of the law of meates drink daies of apparrell of the bodie and from such necessary obseruing of dâ—fference in thinges indifferent and so from all humane traditions to the end that wee might willingly and cheerefully as well in soule as in body serue God in righteousnesse and holinesse all the daies of our life Rom. 4.12.13.14 a 1. Cor. 9.27 Gal 3.45 Tit. 2.11 12 VVhat is the cause of this libertie The chiefe efficient cause is god the meritorious is Christ alone the deliuerer as Ioh. 8.36 It is expressly said If the sonne make you free you shal be free indeed And. Gal. 5.1 stand fast in that libertie whereby christ hath made you free For he hath purchased this libertie for vs with his owne pretious bloud b Col. 1.14 1. Pet. 1.18 The cooperator is the holy Ghost 2. Cor. 3.17 where the spirit of the Lorde is there is libertie who is also both the earnest and witnesser of the same There be two instrumentall causes namely the trueth or the gospell wherein this libertie is propounded Ier. 34.15 Behold I preach libertie Iohn 8.32 yee shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free And faith whereby it is imbraced Rom. 5.2 By faith are we brought into this grace wherein we stand the subiect is euery one that beleeueth whether Grecian or Iew whether male or female whether bond or free 1. Cor. 7.22 c Gal. 3.28 The manner or forme of this spirituall liberty is not perceiued by the sence of man but it is wrought secretly whilest that the soules of the faithfull are besprinkled and washed in the bloude of the sonne of God and are reformed by the holy ghost and their consciences purified by faith from dead workes to serue the liuing god Heb. 9.14 By which meanes it commeth to passe that this liberty wheresoeuer it is hath these accidents or properties righteousnesse peace a good conscience and ioy in the holy ghost a Rom. 14.17 1. Ti. 3.3 And therefore Ioseph inioyeth this liberty although a slaue and bound in prison b Gen. 39 20.21 Daniell sitting amongst the lions c Dan. 6.17 23. Lazarus full of botches and boiles d Luk. 16.20 22. In what thinges doth it consist or how manie partes hath it or how manie degrees be there of this libertie Foure 1. The first is a deliuerance from sinne and death which is wrought by the remission of sinne that it be not imputed by the mortifieng of the flesh least it preuaile and by freeing vs from the second death according to the saying of Paule Rom. 8 1.2 there is no condemnation to them which are in Christ For the law of the spirit of life which is in Christ Iesus that is the spirit of Christ or the grace of regeneration hath freed me from the lawe the authority and force of sinne and death and therefore this is called the libertie of righteousnesse d Col 1 14 Heb. 9.15 and of life and the remission of sinnes e Eph. 1.7 and transgressionsg. the lawe of the spirit of life that is Christs holinesse inherent in Christe which is in Christ Iesus himselfe hath freed me from the lawe of sinne and of death How are we said to be freed from sinne seing it doth alwaies dwell in vs and. Iohn 1.8 If ye say we haue no sinne we deceiue our selues and the truth is not in vs We must distinguish betweene sinne raigning and sinn subdued Rom. 6 6. c. so also betweene the matter and the forme of sinne For we are freed from the raigning and dominion of sinne which dwelleth in vs also from the forme or the guilt of sinne whereupon is that 1. Iohn 3.6 we reade whosoeuer abideth in him sinneth not that is greedily with desire to obey it slavishly and without all resisting of it a that is to say he that is truly partaker of Christ doth not giue himselfe ouer to sinne Againe verse the. 9. euery one that is borne of god sinneth not that is he doth not sinne with full purpose And we do not deny that sinne is in the faithfull or dwelleth in them but that it raigneth not b Rom. 6 12 And touching the guilte Psal 32.1 Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiuen and whose sinnes are couered blessed is the man vnto whome the Lord imputeth no sinne But of sinne subdued and the matter of it Eccle. 7.20 it is written there is no man iust vpon earth which doth good and sinneth not VVhat is the vse ef this part
celebration of the outward worship seruice of God by the aduice counsel of good godly Church gouernours And that such an Ecclesiasticall order being once rightly established may be kept and obserued Dauid 1. Chro. 13.5 by the counsell of the captains gouernours took the Arke of the Lord from Ciriath Icarim to carie it to Ierusalem and 23.2 and the verses following he calleth the Leuites and disposeth to euery one his office and 2. Chron. 29.5 Ezechias being made King presently restoreth Gods worshippe commanding the Priests to sanctifie themselues and to purge the temple It is likewise also the Princes duetie to haue a care of those Schooles wherein good learning and those Arts that are necessarie for the Church are taught and deliuered to nourse and traine vp in conuenient sort godly teachers and to foster and make much of the Church as it is said Esay 49.23 Thy Kings shall bee noursing fathers and thy Queenes noursing mothers They must also bee examples of pietie and vertue as Dauid vowed and professed that hee would bee when hee should be aduanced to the Royall throne a Psa 101 And Claudian saith very wel speaking to a prince on this manner In commune iubes si quid censesue tenendum Primus iussa subi tunc obseruantior aequi Fit populus nec ferre vetat quum viderit ipsum Auctorem parere sibi componitur orbis Regis ad exemplum nec sic inflectere sensus Humanos edicta valent quà m vita regentis Mobile mutatur semper cum principe vulgus If people thou commaundest and think'st they should obey Thou first must keepe thine owne edicts then will they not gainsay The princes life a Lawe the people euer make As Princes change vnconstant folke to change occasion take Whether ought the Magistrate to tolerate onely the true Religion in his Dominions or Diuerse Onely the true Religion L. 3 contra Crescon c 51 because it is the fountaine of all vertues and the cause of all publick and priuate Iustice and happinesse Whereupon Augustine hath this speach Herein Kings as they are commaunded by GOD do serue the Lord when in their kingdom they commaunde those things that are good and forbid those things that are euill and not onely in things pertaining to humane societie but in those also which concerne Diuine Religion And it is the expresse commaundement of God Thou shalt haue none other Gods but mee b Exod 20 Yet notwithstanding sometimes the daies are such that godly Kings and Magistrates mooued with the necessitie of retaining the publick peace and the auoiding of secret plots and seditions are constrained like skilfull Pilots as it were to giue way vnto the tempest and to beare with them that are superstitious or goe astray that so they may rather haue some Religion and some common wealth then none at all Ought the Magistrate to compell any man to beleeue Hee cannot put faith into a man nor compell the minde but he ought to compell the outward man to the hearing of true Doctrine and he ought to further those meanes whereby faith is wrought hindering all scandals and offences and after diligent search and knowledge casting out all publique heresies and errors that weaken faith So wee reade 2. Chron. 34.33 that Iosias tooke away all the abhominations out of all the countries that pertained to the children of Israell and compelled all that were found in Israell to serue the Lord their God Is it lawfull for the Magistrate to put hereticks to the sworde Surely it is especially those that are obstinate seducers of others and wickedly seeke the euersion of Church and common wealth if once beeing conuinced by the Scriptures they doe still remaine incorrigible The reason is 1. The Lawe of God commaundeth the same to bee done to blaspheamers and false Prophets a Levit. 24 16 Deut. 13.5 6.7 17 5.18.20 And Iosias did it very commendably 2. King 23.20 2. Because if Nebuchadnezer a heathen King would not endure them that were blaspheamers against the God of Israel b Dan. 6.25 much lesse ought a Christian Magistrate to tolerate them Bu◠the seduced hereticks if they refuse to bee instructed he shall in wisdome constraine either by banishment or imprisonment vntill they come vnto themselues and repent and renounce their heresie least the scabbed sheepe infect the rest of the flocke and least a little leuen corrupt the whole lumpe 1. Cor. 5.6 Gal. 5.9 Neither must wee thinke that the Gospell detracteth any thing from the ciuill gouernment or iurisdiction in matters concerning the conseruation of religion For Peter vsing an extraordinary authoritie put Ananias to death for his hypocrisie and shamelesse lying c Act. 5.5 And Paul strooke Elimas the sorcerer with blindnesse d Act. 13.11 because hee peruerted the straight waies of the Lord. And the aduise of that moderate man Gamaliel Act. 5.38 for bearing with the Apostles doth not proue that the magistrate hath no power ouer hereticks and perturbers of the Church onely seeing the Iudges readie to slay the Apostles hee laboureth to recall them from that wickednesse No more doth that speach of Saint Paul 2 Cor. 10.4 disarme the Magistrate of the sword where he saith The weapons of our warrefare are not carnall And wheras Paul Tit. 3.10 warneth vs to reiect an heretick after once or twice admonition hee doth not there prescribe the duety of the magistrate but this speach in that place is to bee vnderstoode of priuate admonition or that which is giuen in the Consistorie May a Christian Magistrate exercise ciuill or criminall Iudgements Yes indeede for if a housholder may in his house gouerne his children by discipline correct the stubborne and reward the good surely the same may a Magistrate doe in the common wealth as the Apostle teacheth saying That the Magistrate doth honour good workes and punish the euill e Rom. 13.3.4 Neither doth that saying Mat. 7.1 Iudge not that yee bee not iudged forbidd publick iudgements whether politicall or Ecclesiasticall but onely prohibiteth rash Iudgement of matters either vncertaine as Augustine saith or Diuine which are beyond our reach and to high for vs as saith Saint Hilarie or that iudgement which proceedeth out of the bitternesse of the minde as saith Chrysostome and the purpose of Christ in that place is to treat of contratie or malignant censurers either of matters or persons And as for that Rom. 14.4 Who art thou that iudgest another mans seruant It condemneth their vnmeasurable pride who being puffed vp with the knowledge of Christian libertie make no account at all of their weake brethren And that 1. Cor. 4.5 Iudge nothing before the time forbiddeth onely those Iudgements which are grounded onely vpon slender signes and bare suspicions and not the priuate Iudgements of charitie and much lesse the publick iudgements either of Church or common wealth Lastly that saying of the Apostle Heb. 13 4. Whoremongers and adulterers God will iudge