Selected quad for the lemma: law_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
law_n according_a great_a king_n 5,046 5 3.6170 3 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A33823 English liberties, or, The free-born subject's inheritance containing, I. Magna Charta, the petition of right, the Habeas Corpus Act ... II. The proceedings in appeals of murther, the work and power of Parliament, the qualifications necessary for such ... III. All the laws against conventicles and Protestant dissenters with notes, and directions both to constables and others ..., and an abstract of all the laws against papists. Care, Henry, 1646-1688. 1680 (1680) Wing C515; ESTC R31286 145,825 240

There are 38 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Liberties and of other contained in our Charter of liberties of our Forest the Archbishops Bishops Abbots Priors Earls Barons Knights Freeholders and other our Subjects have given unto us the fifteenth part of all their movables 5. And we have granted unto them on the other part that neither we nor our Heirs shall procure or do any thing whereby the Liberties in this Charter contained shall be Infringed or Broken 6. And if any thing be procured by any Person contrary to the premisses it shall be had of no force nor effect These being Witnesses Lord B. Arch-bishop of Canterbury E. Bishop of London c. We Ratifying and approving these Gifts and Grants aforesaid confirm and make strong all the same for Us and our Heirs perpetually And by the Tenour of these presents do renew the same Willing and granting for Us and our Heirs that this Charter and all and singular his Articles for ever shall be stedfastly Firmly and Inviolably observed And if any Article in the same Charter contained yet hitherto peradventure hath not been kept We will and by Authority Royal Command from henceforth firmly they be observed In Witness whereof we have caused these our Letters Patents to be made T. Edward our Son at Westminster the twenty eighth day of March in the twenty eighth year of our Reign Notes on Magna Charta THis Excellent Law holds the first place in our Statute Books for though there were no doubt many Acts of Parliament long before this yet they are not now Extant 't is called Magna Charta or the Great Charter not in Respect of its Bulk but in Regard of the great Importance and weight of the matters therein contained it is also styled Charta Libertatum Regni the Charter of the Liberties of the Kingdom and upon great reason saith Cook in his Proem is it so called from the effect Quia liberos facit because it makes and preserves the people free Though it run in the stile of the King as a Charter yet as my Lord Cook well observes on the 38 Chapter it appears to have passed in Parliament for there was then a Fifteenth granted to the King by the Bishops Earls Barons Free-tenants and people which could not be but in Parliament nor was it unusual in those times to have Acts of Parliament in a Form of a Charter as you may read in the Princes case Co. Rep. L. 8. Likewise though it be said here that the King hath given and granted these Liberties yet they must not be understood as meer Emanations of Royal Favour or new Bounties granted which the people could not justly challenge or had not a Right unto before For the Lord Cook at divers places asserts and all Lawyers know that this Charter is for the most part only Declaratory of the principal grounds of the Fundamental Laws and Liberties of England no new freedom is hereby granted but a Restitution of such as lawfully they had before and to free them of what had been usurped and encroached upon them by any power whatsoever and therefore you may see this Charter often mentions Sua Jura their Rights and Liberat●s suas their Liberties which shews they had them before and that the same now were Confirmed As to the occasion of this Charter it must be noted that our Ancestors the Saxons had with a most equal poize and temperament very wisely contriv'd their Government and made excellent provisions for their Liberties and to preserve the People from oppression and when William the Norman made himself Master of the Land though he be commonly called the Conquerour yet in truth he was not so and I have known several Judges that would Reprehend any Gentleman at the Bar that casually gave him that Title For though he killed Harold the Usurper and Routed his Army yet he pretended a right to the Kingdom and was admitted by Compact and did take an Oath to observe the Laws and Customs But the truth is he did not perform that Oath so as he ought to have done and his Successors William Rufus King Stephen Henry the First and Richard likewise made frequent Encroachments upon the Liberties of their People but especially King John made use of so many Illegal Devices to drain them of Money that wearied with intollerable oppressions they resolved to oblige the King to grant them their Liberties and to promise the same should be observed which King John did in Running-mead between Stains and Windsor by two Charters one called Charta Libertatum The Charter of Liberties the Form of which you may read in Math. Paris Fol. 246. and is in effect the same with this here recited the other the Charter of the Forrest Copies of which he sent into every County and commanded the Sheriffs c. to see them fulfilled But by ill Council he quickly after began to violate them as much as ever whereupon Disturbances and great miseries arose both to himself and the Realm The Son and Successor of this King John was Henry the Third who in the 19th Year of his Reign Renewed and Confirmed the said Charters but within two Years after Cancelled them by the pernicious advice of his Favourites and particularly Hubert de Burgh whom he had made Lord Chief Justice one that in former times had been a great Lover of his Countrey and a well deserving Patriot as well as learned in the Laws but now to make this a step to his Ambition which ever Rideth without Reins perswaded and humored the King that he might avoid the Charters of his Father King John by Duresse and his own Great Charter and Charta de Foresta also for that he was within Age when he granted the same whereupon the King in the eleventh Year of his Reign being then of full Age got one of the great Charters and of the Forrest into his Hands and by the Council principally of this Hubert his Chief Justice at a Council holden at Oxford unjustly Cancelled both the said Charters notwithstanding the said Hubert de Burgh was the primier Witness of all the Temporal Lords to both the said Charters whereupon he became in high Favour with the King insomuch that he was soon after viz. the 10th of December in the 13th Year of that King Created to the highest Dignity that in those times a Subject had to be an Earl viz. of Kent But soon after for Flatterers and Humorists have no sure Foundation he fell into the Kings heavy Indignation and after many fearful and miserable Troubles he was justly and according to Law Sentenced by his Peers in an open Parliament and justly Degraded of that Dignity which he unjustly had obtained by his Council for Cancelling of Magna Charta and Charta de Foresta In the 9th Chap. of this great Charter all the Ancient Liberties and Customs of London are Confirmed and preserved which is likewise done by divers other Statutes as 14 Edw. 3. Cap. 2. c. The 29 Chapt. NO FREE-MAN SHALL BE TAKEN
place then under pretence of Service as Ambassador or the like he might send him into the furthest part of the World which being an Exile is prohibited by this Act. 5. No Man destroyed That is forejudged of Life or Limb or put to Torture or Death every oppression against Law by colour of any usurped Authority is a kind of destruction And the words Aliquo modo any otherwise are added to this Verb destroyed and to no other Verb in this Chapter and therefore all things by any manner of means tending to destruction are prohibited as if a Man be accused or Indicted of Treason or Felony his Lands or Goods cannot be granted to any no not so much as by promise nor any of his Lands or Goods seized into the Kings hands before he is Attainted For when a Subject obtaineth a promise of the forfeiture many times undue means and more violent prosecution is used for private Lucre tending to destruction than the quiet and just proceeding of the Law would permit and the party ought to live of his own until Attainder 6. By Lawful Judgment of his Peers That is by his Equals Men of his own Rank and Condition The general division of Persons by the Law of England is either one that is Noble and in respect of his Nobility of the Lords House of Parliament or one of the Commons and in respect thereof of the House of Commons in Parliament And as there be divers degrees of Nobility as Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons and yet all of them are comprehended under this word Peers and are Peers of the Realm so of the Commons there be Knights Esquires Gentlemen Citizens and Yeomen and yet all of them of the Commons of the Realm And as every of the Nobles is one a Peer to another though he be of a several degree so it is of the Commons and as it hath been said of Men so doth it hold of Noble Women either by Birth or Marriage And forasmuch as this Judgment by Peers is called Lawful it shews the Antiquity of this manner of Trial It was the ancient accustomed Legal Course long before this Charter Or by the Law of the Land That is by due process of Law for so the words are expresly expounded by the Stat. of 37 Edw. 3. chap. 8. And these words are specially to be referred to those foregoing to whom they relate As none shall be condemn'd without a lawful Trial by his Peers so none shall be taken Imprison'd or put out of his Free-hold without due process of the Law that is by the Indictment or Presentment of good and lawful Men of the place in due manner or by Writ Original of the Common-Law Now seeing that no Man can be Taken Arrested Attached or Imprisoned but by due process of Law and according to the Law of the Land these conclusions hereupon do follow 1. That the Person or Persons which commit any must have lawful Authority 2. It is necessary that the Warrant or Mittimus be lawful and that must be in Writing under his Hand and Seal 3. The Cause must be contained in the Warrant as for Treason Felony c. Suspicion of Treason or Felony or the like particular Crime For if it do not thus specifie the Cause if the Prisoner bring his Habeas Corpus he must be discharged because no Crime appears on the Return Nor is it in such Case any offence at all if the Prisoner make his escape whereas if the Mittimus contain the Cause the escape would respectively be Treason or Felony though in Truth he were not Guilty of the first offence And this mentioning the Cause is agreeable to Scripture Acts 5. 4. The Warrant or Mittimus containing a lawful Cause ought to have a lawful conclusion c. And him safely to keep until he be delivered by Law c. and not until the party committing shall further Order If any Man by colour of any Authority where he hath not any in that particular Case shall presume to Arrest or Imprison any Man or cause him to be Arrested or Imprisoned this is against this Act and it is most hateful when it is done by Countenance of Justice King Edw. the 6th did Incorporate the Town of Saint Albans and granted to them to make Ordinances c. They made a by-Law upon pain of Imprisonment and it was adjudged to be against this Statute of Magna Charta so it had been if such an Ordinance had been contained in the Patent it self We will sell to no Man deny to no Man c. This is spoken in the Person of the King who in Judgment of Law in all his Courts of Justice is present And therefore every Subject of this Realm for injury done to him in Bonis Terris vel Persona in Person Lands or Goods by any other Subject Ecclesiastical or Temporal whatever he be without exception may take his Remedy by the course of the Law and have Justice and Right for the Injury done him Freely without sale Fully without any denial and Speedily without delay For Justice must have three Qualities it must be Libera Free for nothing is more odious than Justice set to sale Plena Full for Justice ought not to limp or be granted Piece-meal and Celeris speedy Quia Dilatio est quaedam negatio Delay is a kind of denial And when all these meet it is both Justice and Right We will not deny nor delay any Man c. These words have been excellently expounded by latter Acts of Parliament that by no means common right or common law should be disturbed or delayed no though it be commanded under the Great Seal or Privy Seal Order Writ Letters Message or Commandment whatsoever either from the King or any other and that the Justices shall proceed as if no such Writs Letters Order Message or other Commandment were come to them all our Judges swear to this for 't is part of their Oaths so that if any shall be found wresting the Law to serve a Court Turn they are perjur'd as well as unjust The Common-laws of the Realm should by no means be delayed for the Law is the surest Sanctuary that a Man can take and the strongest Fortress to protect the weakest of all Lex est tutissima Cassis the Law is a most safe Head-piece and sub Clipeo legis nemo decipitur no man is deceived whilst the Law is his Buckler but the King may stay his own suit as a Capias pro fine for the King may Respit his Fine and the like All Protections that are not Legal which appear not in the Register nor warranted by our Books are expresly against this Branch nulli diff●remus we will not delay any Man As a Protection under the Great Seal granted to any Man directed to the Sheriffs c. and commanding them that they shall not Arrest him during a certain time at any other Mans suit which hath words in it Per Prerogativ●m nostram
shall be tryed for any Offence against this Act by his Peers but if Convicted shall be disabled to sit in Parliament during Life And thus much for what is Treason at this day By the Statute of 1 and 2 Phil. and Mar. cap 10. All Trials for Treason shall be only according to the Course of the Common Law And though the greater part of that Statute being Temporary be expired yet this Clause is still in Force The Judgment in all Cases of High Treason except for Counterfeiting Coin for a man is That he shall be drawn on an Hurdle or Sledge to the place of Execution and there be Hanged by the Neck to be cut down being yet alive his Privy Members cut off his Bowels ript up taken out and burnt before his face his Headsevered from his Body his Body divided into four Quarters which are to be disposed of as the King shall order But for Counterfeiting Coin only Drawn and Hanged And in both Cases for a Woman for Modesty sake it is only that she shall be Burnt The reasons or signification of this horrid Judgment on a man for Treason are thus by some rendred and Interpreted 1. He is drawn on a Sledg or Hurdle on the ground in the Dirt to shew that his Pride is brought down for Treason commonly springs from Ambition 2. On this Hurdle he is drawn backward to shew that his Actings have been contrary to Order unnatural and Preposterous 3. He is Hanged between Heaven and Earth as unworthy of either 4. He is cut down yet alive and his Privities cut off to shew that he was unfit to Propagate any Posterity 5. His Head is severed from his Body because his mischevious Brain contrived the Treason 6. His Body is divided to shew that all his Machinations and Devices are torn to pieces and brought to nought and into four parts that they may be scattered towards the four Quarters of the World Heading being part of the judgment in Treason the King commonly to persons of Quality Pardons all the rest of the Sentence and so they are only Beheaded But if a person be Attainted of Murder or any other Felony if he be Beheaded 't is no Execution of the Judgment because there the Judgment always is that he be Hanged till he be dead which cannot be altered So that had Count Conning smark lately been Convicted and Condemned for the Murder of Esquire Thynn all his Guinies or his Friends could not have preserved him from the Gallows unless they could have got an intire Pardon Any person being Indicted for Treason may Challenge that is except against or refuse Five and Thirty Jurors peremptorily that is for his pleasure or for reasons best known to himself and without assigning any Cause to the Court But if he Challenge more that is above three full Juries he Forseits his Goods and Judgment of Peinfort dure that is of being pressed to Death shall pass upon him as one that refuseth the Trial of the Law In Cases of Murder and Felony a man cannot Challenge peremptorily above the number of Twenty But with Cause he may except against more And this is by the Stat. of 22. H. 8. cap. 14. And certainly since the Law of England which is a Law of Mercy does in Favour of Life not only order a man to be Tryed by a Jury of his Country and Equals but also allows him to refuse and have Liberty of excepting against so many of those as shall be Impanelled for that purpose It cannot be supposed that the same Law ever intended that the Prisoner should be denyed a Copy of the Pannel of his Jury that so by the Information of his Friends or otherwise he may know their Qualities Circumstances and Inchnations for how else shall he know whom to Challenge peremptorily and whom to Challenge with Cause to allow a man such Liberty of Challenge and give him no opportunity of such Inquiry is but to mock the Prisoner to whom possibly the whole Jury by face and name may be utter Strangers and sure the wisdom of our Laws never thought every Prisoner so skilled in Metoposcopy that meerly by looking on a parcel of men he could tell which of them were indifferent and which biassed against him Another Statute of King Edward the third Anno 2. Edw. 3. cap. 2. In what Cases only Pardon of Felony shall be granted c. ITem Whereas Offendors have been greatly encouraged because the Charters of Pardon have been so easily granted in times past of Man-slaughters Roberies Felonies and other Trespasses against the Peace 2 It is ordained and Enacted that such Charters shall not be granted but only where the King may do it by his Oath that is to say where a man slayeth another in his own Defence or by Misfortune 3 And also they have been encouraged because that the Justices of the Goal-Delivery and of Oyer and Terminer have been procured by great men against the Form of the Statute made in the 27th year of the Reign of King Edward Grandfather to our Lord the King that now is wherein is Contained that Justices Assigned to take Assizes if they be Lay-Men shall make deliverance and if the one be a Clerk and the other a Lay-man that the Lay-Judge with another of the Countrey associate to him shall deliver the Goals 4 Wherefore it is Enacted that Justices shall not be made against the Form of the said Statute 5 And that the Assizes Attaints and Certifications be taken before the Justices commonly Assigned which should be good men and Lawful having knowledg of the Law and none other after the Form if another Statute made in the time of the said King Edward the first 6 And that the Oyers and Terminers shall not be granted but before the Justices of the one Bench or the other or the Justices Errants and that great hurt or horrible Trespasses and of the Kings special Grace after the Form of the S●atute thereof ordained in time of the said Grandfather and none otherwise The Comment Touching this Statute and several others to the same purpose as 14. Edw. 3. cap. 14. and 10. Edw. 3. cap. 2. and 13. R. 2. cap. 1. and 16. R. cap. 6. c. We shall only give you the words of Cook in the third part of his Instit fo 236. What things the King may pardon and in what manner and what he cannot pardon falleth now to be treated of IN case of death of man Robberies and Felonies against the Peace divers Acts of Parliament have Restrained the power of granting Charters of pardons first that no such Charters shall be granted but in case where the King may do it by his Oath Secondly That no man shall obtain Charters out of Parliament Stat. 4. Edw 3. cap 13. And accordingly in a Parliament Roll it is said for the Peace of the Land it would much help if good Justices were appointed in every County if such as be let to mainprize do put
betwixt the said Sheriffs and the said Chusers so to be made 5 and every Sheriff of the Realm of England shall have power by the said authority to examine upon the Evangelists every such Chuser how much he may expend by the year 6 and if any Sheriff returned Knights to come to the Parliament contrary to the said Ordinance the Justices of Assizes in their Sessions of Assizes shall have power by the authority aforesaid thereof to enquire 7 and if by inquest the same be found before the Justices and the Sheriff thereof be duly attainted that then the said Sheriff shall incur the pain of an hundred pounds to be paid to our Lord the King and also that he have Imprisonment by a year without being let to mainprise or bail 8 and that the Knights for the Parliament returned contrary to the said Ordinance shall lose their wages Provided always that he which cannot expend forty Shillings by year as afore is said shall in no wise be Chuser of the Knights for the Parliament 2 and that in every Writ that shall hereafter go forth to the Sheriffs to chuse knights for the Parliament mention be made of the said Ordinances Note Though this Statute make the penalty on a Sheriff but 100 l. for a false Return yet the House may further punish him by Imprisonment c. at their pleasure by the Law and Custom of Parliaments We shall now proceed to certain excellent Laws of a latter Date made for the explanation and conservation of our Liberties and in the first place present you with that excellent Petition of Right granted by King Charles the first Anno Regni Caroli Regis Tertio The PETITION exhibited to His Majesty by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in this present Parliament assembled concerning diverse Rights and Liberties of the Subjects To the Kings most excellent Majesty HUmbly shew unto our Soveraign Lord the King the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in Parliament assembled That whereas it is declared and enacted by a Statute made in the time of the Reign of King Edward the first commonly called Statutum de Tallagio non Concedendo that no Tallage or Aid shall be laid or Levyed by the King or his Heirs in this Realm without the good Will and Assent of the Arch-bishops Bishops Earles Barons Knights Burgesses and other the Freemen of the Commonalty of this Realm 2 and by authority of Parliament holden in the five and twentieth year of the Reign of King Edward the third it is declared and Enacted that from thenceforth no person should be Compelled to make any Loans to the King against his Will because such Loans were against Reason and the Franchise of the Land 3 And by other Laws of the Realm it is provided that none should be Charged by any Charges or Imposition called a Benevolence nor by such like Charge 4 By which the Statute before mentioned and othe the good Laws and Statutes of this Realm your Subjects have Inherited this Freedom that they should not be Compelled to Contribute to any Tax Tallage Aid or other like Charge not set by Common Consent in Parliament 2. Yet nevertheless of late divers Commissions directed to sundry Commissioners in several Counties with Instructions have Issued by means whereof your people have been in divers places Assembled and required to lend certain Sums of Money unto your Mejesty and many of them upon their refusal so to do have had an Oath administred unto them not warrantable by the Laws or Statutes of this Realm and have been Constrained to become bound to make Appearance and Attendance before your Privy Council and in other places and others of them have been therefore Imprisoned Confined and sundry other ways molested and disquieted 2 and divers other Charges have been laid and levyed upon your people in several Counties by Lord Lieutenants and Deputy Lieutenants Commissioners for Musters Justices of Peace and others by Command or direction from your Majesty to your Privy Council against the Law and free Customs of this Realm 3. And where also by the Statute called the great Charter of the Liberties of England it is declared and Enacted that no Freeman may be taken or imprisoned or be disseised of his Freehold or Liberties or of his free Customs or be outlawed or Exiled or in any manner destroyed but by the lawfull Judgment of his Peers or by the Law of the Land 4. And in the eight and twentieth year of the Reign of King Edward the third it was declared and Enacted by Authority of Parliament that no man of what Estate or Condition that he be should be put out of his Land or Tenements nor taken nor Imprisoned nor disherited nor put to death without being brought to answer by due process of Law 5. Nevertheless against the tenor of the said Statutes and other the good Laws and Statutes of your Realm to that end provided diverse of your Subjects of late have been Imprisoned without any cause shewed 2 and when for their deliverance they were brought before Justices by your Majesties Writs of Habeas Corpus there to undergo and receive as the Court should order and their keepers commanded to certify the causes of their detainour no cause was certifyed but that they were detained by your Majesties special command signified by the Lords of your privy Council and yet were returned back to several prisons without being charged with any thing to which they might make answer according to the Law 6. Whereas of late great Companies of Souldiers and Mariners have been dispersed into diverse Counties of the Realm and the Inhabitants against their wills have been compelled to receive them into their Houses and there to suffer them to sojourn against the Laws and Customes of this Realm and to the great grievance and vexation of the People 7. And whereas also by authority of Parliament and in the five and twentieth year of the reign of King Edward the third it is declared and enacted that no man shall be forejudged of life and limb against the form of the great Charter and Law of the Land 2 and by the said great Charter and other the Laws and Statutes of this Your Realm no man ought to be Judged to death but by the Laws established in this your Realm either by the Customes of the Realm or by Acts of Parliament 3 And whereas no offendor of what kind soever is exempted from the proceedings to be used and punishments to be Inflicted by the Laws and Statutes of this your Realm nevertheless of late diverse Commissions under Your Majesties great Seal have Issued forth by which certain persons have been Assigned and appointed Commisioners with power and authority to proceed within the Land according to the Justice of Martial Law against such Souldiers and Mariners or other dissolute persons joining with them as should commit any Murder Robbery Felony Mutiny or other Outrage or Misdemeanour whatsoever and by such summary Course
and Order as is agreable to Martial Law and as is used in Armies in time of war to proceed to the Tryal and Condemnation of such Offeuders and them to cause to be executed and put to death according to the Law Martial 8. By Pretext whereof some of your Majesties Subjects have been by some of the said Commissioners put to death when and where if by the Laws and Statutes of the Land they had deserved death by the same Laws and Statutes also they might and by no other ought to have been Judged and Executed 9. And also sundry greivous offenders by colour thereof claiming an exemption have Escaped the punishments due to them by the Laws and Statute of this your Realm by reason that divers of your Officers and Ministers of Justice have unjustly refused or forborne to proceed against such Offenders according to the same Laws and Statutes upon pretence that the said Offenders were punishable only by Martial Law and by Authority of such Commission as aforesaid 2 which Commissions and all other of like nature are wholly and directly Contrary to the said Laws and Statutes of this your Realm 10. They do therefore humbly pray your most Excellent Maiesty that no man hereafter be compelled to make or yield any Gift Loan Benevolence Tax or such like Charge without Common consent by act of Parliament 2 and that none be called to make answer or take such oath or to give attendance or be confined or otherwise molested or disquieted concerning the same or for refusal thereof 3 and that no Freeman in any such manner as is before mentioned be Imprisoned or detained 4 And that your Majesty would be pleased to remove the said Souldiers and Mariners and that your people may not be so burthened in time to come 5 and that the foresaid Commissions for proceeding by Martial Law may be revoked and annulled and that hereafter no Commissions of like nature may Issue forth to any person or persons whatsoever to be executed as aforesaid lest by colour of them any of your Majesties Subjects be destroyed or put to death contrary to the Laws and Franchise of the Land 11. All which they most humbly pray of your most Excellent Majesty as their Rights and Liberties according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm and that your Majestie would also vouchsafe to declare that the awards doings and proceedings to the prejudice of your people in any of the premisses shall not be drawn hereafter into Consequence or Example 2 and that your Majesty would be also graciously pleased for the further comfort and safety of your people to declare your Royal Will and Pleasure that in the things aforesaid all your Officers and Ministers shall serve you according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm as they tender the honour of Your Majesty and the prosperity of this Kingdom Which Petition be●ng Read the second of June 1682. the Kings Answer was thus delivered unto it The King willeth that Right be done according to the Laws and Customs of the Realm and that the Statutes be put in due Execution that His Subjects may have no Cause to complain of any wrong or oppressions contrary to their just Rights and Liberties To the Preservation whereof he holds himself in Conscience as well obliged as of his Prerogative But this Answer not giving satisfaction the King was again Petitioned unto that he would give a full and satisfactory answer to their Petition in full Parlinment Whereupon the King in Person upon the seventh of June made this Second Answer My Lords and Gentlemen The Answer I have already given you was made with so good Deliberation and approved by the Judgment of so many Wise Men that I could not have Imagined but that it should have given you full satisfaction but to avoid all ambiguous Interpretations and to shew you that there is no doubleness in my meaning I am willing to please you in words as well as in substance read your Petition and you shall have an Answer that I am sure will please you And then causing the Petition to be read distinctly by the Clerk of the Crown the Clerk of the Parliament read the Kings Answer thereto in these words Soit Droit Fait Come est desire which is Let Right be done as is desired This Answer and the manner of Confirming this Law I have the rather recited because the Kings Answer and Circumstances relating thereunto are wholly left out in our last Printed Book of Statutes The Petition it self is so plain that there needs no Comment thereon only the Reader may observe that the things therein mentioned were the antient Rights of the people and therefore they expresly demand them of the King as their Rights and Liberties In the next place we shall add the late excellent Habeas Corpus Act because relating to the same Subject viz. The freeing of the Subject from causeless tedious and Arbitrary Imprisonments Anno Tricesimo primo Caroli Secundi Regis CHAP. II. An Act for the better securing the Liberty of the Subjest and for prevention of Imprisonments beyond Seas Comonly called the Habeas Corpus Act. I. VVHereas great delays have been used by Sheriffs Goalers and other Officers to whose Custody any of the Kings Subjects have been committed for Criminal or supposed Criminal matters in making Returns of Writs of Habeas Corpus to them directed by standing out an Alias and Pluries Habeas Corpus and sometimes more and by other shifts to avoid their yielding obedience to such Writs contrary to their duty and the known Laws of the Land whereby many of the Kings Subjects have been and hereafter may be long detained in Prison in such Cases where by Law they are Bailable to their great Charges and Vexation II. For the prevention whereof and the more speedy relief of all persons Imprisoned for any such Criminal or supposed Criminal matters 2 Be it Enacted by the Kings most Excellent Majesty by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in this present Parliament Assembled and by the Authority thereof That whensoever any person or persons shall bring any Habeas Corpus directed unto any Sheriff or Sheriffs Goaler Minister or other person whatsoever for any person in his or their Custody and the said Writ shall be served upon the said Officer or left at the Goal or Prison with any of the under Officers under Keepers or Deputy of the said Officers or Keepers that the said Officer or Officers his or their under Officers or Keepers or Deputies shall within three days after the service thereof as aforesaid unless the Commitment aforesaid were for Treason or Felony plainly and specially expressed in the Warrant of Commitment upon payment or tender of the Charges of bringing the said Prisoner to be Ascertained be the Judge or Court that awarded the same and Endorsed upon the said Writ not exceeding twelve pence per Mile and upon security given by his
no Man of what Estate or Condition soever he be shall be put out of his Lands or Tenements nor taken nor Imprisoned nor Dis-inherited without being brought in to Answer by due Process of Law 5. And by another Statute made in the two and fortieth year of the Reign of the said King Edward the Third it is Enacted That no Man be put to Answer without Presentment before Justices or matter of Record or by due Process and Writ Original according to the Old Law of the Land and if any thing be done to the contrary it shall be void in Law and holden for Errour 6. And by another Statute in the six and thirtieth year of the Reign of the same King Edward the Third it is amongst other things Enacted That all Pleas which shall be pleaded in any Courts before any of the King's Justices or in his other places or before any of his other Ministers or in the Courts and places of any other Lords within the Realm shall be Entred and Enrolled in Latine 7. And whereas by the Statute made in the third year of King Henry the Seventh Power is given to the Chancellor the Lord Treasurer of England for the time being and the Keeper of the Kings Privy Seal or two of them calling unto them a Bishop and a Temporal Lord of the King 's Most Honourable Council and the Two Chief Justices of the King's Bench and Common Pleas for the time being or other two Justices in their Absence to proceed as in that Act is expressed for the punishment of some particular Offences therein mentioned 8. And by the Statute made in the one and twentyeth year of King Henry the Eighth the President of the Council is Associated to joyn with the Lord Chancellour and other Judges in the said Statute of the Third of Henry the Seventh mentioned 9. But the said Judges have not kept themselves to the points limited by the said Statute but have undertaken to punish where no Law doth warrant and to make Decrees for things having no such Authority and to Inflict heavier punishments than by any Law is warranted 2. And forasmuch as all matters Examinable or Determinable before the said Judges or in the Court commonly called the Star-Chamber many have their proper Remedy and Address their due punishment and correction by the Common Law of the Land and in the ordinary course of Justice elsewhere 2. And forasmuch as the Reasons and Motives inducing the Erection and Continuance of that Court do now cease 3. And the Proceedings Censures and Decrees of that Court have by Experience been found to be an Intollerable Burthen to the Subject and the means to Introduce an Arbitrary Power and Government 4. And forasmuch as the Council-Table hath of late times assumed unto it self a Power to Intermeddle in Civil and matters only of private Interest between Party and Party have adventured to determin of the Estates and Liberties of the Subjects contrary to the Law of the Land and the Rights and Priviledges of the Subject by which great and manifold mischiefs and inconveniences have arisen and happened and much Incertainty by means of such proceedings hath been conceived concerning mens Rights and Estates for settling whereof and preventing the like in time to come 3. Be it Ordained and Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That the said Court commonly called the Star-Chamber and all Jurisdiction Power and Authority belonging unto or Exercised in the same Court or by any the Judges Officers or Ministers thereof be from the first day of August in the Year of our Lord God one thousand six hundred forty and one clearly and absolutely dissolved taken away and determined 2. And that from the said first day of August neither the Lord Chancellour or Keeper of the Great Seal of England the Lord Treasurer of England the Keeper of the Kings privy Seal or President of the Council nor any Bishop Temporal Lord privy Councellour or Judge or Justice whatsoever shall have any power or Authority to hear examine or determine any matter or thing whatsoever in the said Court commonly called the Star-Chamber or to make pronounce or deliver any Judgment Sentence Order or Decree or to do any Judicial or Ministerial Act in the said Court 3. And that all and every Act and Acts of Parliament and all and every Article clause and Sentence in them and every of them by which any Jurisdiction Power or Authority is given Limited or appointed unto the said Court commonly called the Star-Chamber or unto all or any the Judges Officers or Ministers thereof or for any Proceedings to be had or made in the said Court or for any matter or thing to be drawn into question Examined or determined there shall for so much as concerneth the said Court of Star-Chamber and the power and Authority thereby Given unto it be from the said first day of August Repealed and Absolutely Revoked and made void 4. And be it likewise Enacted That the like Jurisdiction now used and Exercised in the Court before the President and Council in the Marches of Wales 2. and also in the Court before the President and Council Established in the Northern parts 3. and also in the Court commonly called the Court of the Dutchy of Lancaster held before the Chancellour and Council of that Court 4. And also in the Court of Exchequer of the County Palatine of Chester held before the Chamberlain and Council of that Court 5. The like Jurisdiction being Exercised there shall from the said first day of August one thousand six hundred forty and one be also Repealed and Absolutely Revoked and made void any Law prescription Custom or Usage or the said statute made in the third year of King Henry the Seventh or the statute made the one and twentieth of Henry the Eighth or any Act or Acts of Parliament heretofore had or made to the Contrary thereof in any wise notwithstanding 6. And that from henceforth no Court Council or place of Judicature shall be Erected Ordained constituted or appointed within this Realm of England or Dominion of Wales which shall have use or Exercise the same or the like Jurisdiction as is or hath been used practised or Exercised in the said Court of Star-Chamber 5. Be it likewise declared and Enacted by Authority of this present Parliament That neither His Majesty nor his Privy Council have or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power or Authority by English Bill Petition Articles Libel or any other Arbitrary way whatsoever to Examine or draw into question determine or dispose of the Lands Tenements Hereditaments goods or Chattels of any of the Subjects of this Kingdom but that the same ought to be tryed and determined in the ordinary Courts of Justice and by the ordinary course of the Law 6. And be it further provided and Enacted That If any Lord Chancellor or Keeper of the Great Seal of England Lord Treasurer Keeper of the Kings Privy Seal President
Assent and Consent to the use of all things contained and prescribed in the Book of Common-Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments and other Rites Ceremonies of the Church according to the use of the Church of England or have not subscribed the Declaration or Acknowledgment contained in a certain Act of Parliament made in the 14 Year of His Majesties Reign and Intituled An Act for the Vniformity of publick Prayers and Administration of Sacraments and other Rites and Ceremonies and for the establishing the Form of making ordaining and consecrating of Bishops Priests and Deacons in the Church of England according to the said Act or any other subsequent Act And whereas they or some of them and diverse other person and persons not ordained according to the Form of the Church of England and as have since the Act of Oblivion taked upon them to preach in unlawful Assemblies Conventicles or Meetings under colour or pretence of Exercise of Religion contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Kingdom have setled themselves in divers Corporations in England sometimes three or more of them in a place thereby taking an opportunity to distil the poisonous Principles of Schism and Rebellion into the hearts of His Majesties Subjects to the great danger of the Church and Kingdom II. Be it therefore enacted by the Kings most excellent Majesty by and with the Advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same That the said Parsons Vicars Curates Lecturers and other persons in Holy Orders or pretended Holy Orders or pretending to Holy Orders and all Stipendiaries or other persons who have been possessed of any Ecclesiastical or Spiritual Promotion and every of them who have not declared their unfeigned Assent and Consent as aforesaid and subscribed the Declaration aforesaid and shall not take and subcribe the Oath following I A. B. do swear That it is not lawful upon any pretence whatsoever to take Arms against the King and that I do abhor that Traiterous position of taking Arms by his Authority against his Person or against those that are commissioned by him in pursuance of such Commissions and that I will not at any time endeavour any Alteration of Government either in Church or State III. And all such person and persons as shall take upon them to preach in any unlawful Assembly Conventicle or Meeting under colour or pretence of any exercise of Religion contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Kingdom 2. shall not at any time from and after the 24th day of March which shall be in this present year of our Lord God One thousand six hundred sixty and five unless only in passing upon the Road come or be within five Miles of any City or Town Corporate or Burrough that sends Burgesses to the Parliament within His Majesties Kingdom of England Principality of Wales or of the Town of Berwick upon Tweed 3 or within five Miles of any parish Town or place wherein he or they have since the Act of Oblivion been Parson Vicar Curate Stipendiary or Lecturer or taken upon them to preach in any unlawful Assembly Conventicle or Meeting under colour or pretence of any exercise of Religion contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Kingdom 4 Before he or they have taken and subscribed the Oath aforesaid before the Justices of the Peace at their Quarter-Sessions to be holden for County Riding or Division next unto the said Corporation City or Burrough Parish place or Town in open Court which said Oath the said Justices are hereby impowered there to administer 5 Upon forfeiture for every such Offence the sum of Forty pounds of lawful English Money the one third part thereof to His Majesty and His Successors the other third part to the use of the poor of the Parish where the Offence shall be committed and the other third part thereof to such person or persons as shall or will sue for the same by Action of Debt Plaint Bill or Information in any Court of Record at Westminster or before any Justices of Assize Oyer and Terminer or Gaol-delivery or before any Justices of the Counties Palatine of Chester Lancaster or Durham or the Justices of the great Sessions in Wales or before any Justices of Peace in their Quarter Sessions wherein no Essoin Protection or wager of Law shall be allowed IV. Provided always and be it further enacted by the Authority aforesaid That it shall not be lawful for any person or persons restrained from coming to any City Town Corporate Burrough Parish Town or place as aforesaid or for any other Person or Persons as shall not first take and subscribe the aforesaid Oath and as shall not frequent Divine Service established by the Laws of this Kingdom and carry him or her self reverently decently and orderly there to teach any publick or private School or take any Boarders or Tablers that are taught or instructed by him or her self or any other upon pain for every such Offence to forfeit the sum of Forty pounds to be recovered and distributed as aforesaid V. Provided also and be it further enacted by the Authority aforesaid that it shall be lawful for any two Justices of the Peace of the respective County upon Oath to them of any Offence against this Act which Oath they are hereby impowered to administer to commit the Offender for six Months without Bail or Mainprise unless upon or before such Commitment he shall before the said Justices of the Peace swear and subscribe the aforesaid Oath and Declaration VI. Provided always that if any person intended to be restrained by vertue of this Act shall without fraud or Covin be served with any Writ Sub-poena Warranr or other Process whereby his personal appearance is required his Obedience to such Writ Sub-poena or Process shall not be construed an Offence against this Act. Note That as to the Penalty of Forty Pound the party must be tried at the Assises or Sessions before it is forfeited But any two Justices of Peace may commit for six Months unless before them he 'l swear and subscribe the Oath in this Declaration specified the Assent and Consent and the Declaration therein referr'd unto which if he do he puts himself out of their power Now the Assent and Consent he has spoke of is appointed by the Stat. 13 and 14. of Car. 2di chap. 4. as follows I A. B. do here declare my unfeigned Assent Consent to all every thing contained prescribed in by the Book intituled the Book of common Prayer Administration of the Sacraments and other Rites and Ceremonies of the Church according to the use of the Church of England together with the Psalter or Psalms of David pointed as they are to be sung or said in Churches and the form and manner of making ordaining and consecrating of Bishops Priests and Deacons The Declaration is by the Act last mentioned as
c. Deserves to be written in Letters of Gold and I have often wondered the words thereof are not Inscribed in Capitals on all our Courts of Judicature Town-Halls and most publick Edifices they are the Elixir of our English Freedoms the Storehouse of all our Liberties And because my Lord Cook in the second part of his Institutes has many excellent Observations I shall here Recite his very words This Chapter containeth nine several Branches 1. That no man be taken or Imprisoned but per Legem terrae that is by the Common Law Statute-Law or Custome of England For these words per Legem terrae being towards the end of this Chapter do Refer to all the precedent matters in this Chapter and this hath the first place because the Liberty of a mans person is more pretious to him than all the rest that follow and therefore it is great reason that he should by Law be Relieved therein if he be wronged as hereafter shall be shewed 2. No man shall be Disseised that is put out of Seisin or dispossessed of his Free-hold that is Lands or Livelyhood or of his Liberties or free Customs that is of such Franchises and Freedoms and free Customs as belong to him by his Free Birth-Right unless it be by the lawful Judgment that is Verdict of his equals that is of men of his own Condition or by the Law of the Land that is to speak it once for all by the due Course and process of Law 3. No man shall be Outlawed made an Exlex put out of the Law that is deprived of the Benefit of the Law unless he be Outlawed according to the Law of the Land 4. No man shall be Exiled or Banished out of his Countrey that is Nemo perdet patriam no man shall lose his Countrey unless he be Exiled according to the Law of the Land 5. No man shall in any sort be destroyed Destruere id est quod prius structum factum fuit penitus Evertere Diruere unless it be by the Verdict of his Equals or according to the Law of the Land 6. No man shall be Condemned at the Kings Suit either before the King in his Bench where the Pleas are Coram Rege and so are the words Nec super eum ibimus to be understood nor before any other Commissioner or Judge whatsoever and so are the words Nec super eum mittimus to be understood but by the Judgment of his Peers that is Equals or according to the Law of the Land 7. We shall sell to no man Justice or Right 8. We shall deny to no man Justice or Right 9. We shall defer to no man Justice or Right Each of these we shall briefly explain 1. No man shall be taken that is Restrained of Liberty by Petition or Suggestion to the King or his Council unless it be by Indictment or Presentment of good and lawful men where such deeds be done This Branch and divers other parts of this Act have been notably explained and Construed by divers Acts of Parliament several of which you will find Recited hereafter in this Book 2. No man shall be Disseised c. Hereby is intended that Lands Tenements Goods and Chattels shall not be seised into the Kings Hands contrary to this great Charter and the Law of the Land nor any man shall be disseised of his Lands or Tenements or dispossessed of his Goods or Chattels contrary to the Law of the Land A Custom was alleadged in the Town of C. that if the Tenant cease by two years that the Lord should enter into the Freehold of the Tenant and hold the same until he were satisfied of the Arrearages it was adjudged a Custom against the Law of the Land to enter into a Mans Freehold in that case without Action or Answer King Henry 6. Granted to the Corporation of Diers within London power to search c. And if they found any Cloath died with Log-Wood that the Cloath should be Forfeit And it was adjuged that this Charter concerning the Forfeiture was against the Law of the Land and this Statute For no Forfeiture can grow by Letters Patents No Man ought to be put from his Livelihood without Answer 3. No Man Outlawed That is barred to have the benefit of the Law And note to this word Outlawed these words Vnless by the Law of the Land do Referr Of his Liberties This word hath three Significations 1. As it hath been said it signifieth the Laws of the Realm in which respect this Charter is called Charta Libertatum as aforesaid 2. It signifieth the Freedom the Subjects of England have for example the Company of Merchant-Taylors of England having power by their Charter to make Ordinances made an Ordinance that every Brother of the same Society should put the one half of his Cloaths to be dressed by some Cloath-Workers Free of the same Company upon pain to Forfeit 10 s. c. And it was adjuged that this Ordinance was against Law because it was against the Liberty of the Subject for every Subject hath freedom to put his Cloaths to be dressed by whom he will sic de similibus And so it is if such or the like grant had been made by his Letters Patents 3. Liberties signifie the Franchises and Priviledges which the Subjects have of the gift of the King as the Goods and Chattels of Felons Out-laws and the like or which the Subject claims by Prescription as wreck waife straie and the like So likewise and for the same reason if a Grant be made to any Man to have the Sole making of Cards or the Sole dealing with any other Trade that Grant is against the Liberty and Freedom of the Subject that before did or lawfully might have used that Trade and consequently against this great Charter Generally all Monopolies are against this great Charter because they are against the Liberty and Freedom of the Subject and against the Law of the Land 4. No Man Exiled that is Banisht or forced to depart or stay out of England without his Consent By the Law of the Land no Man can be Exiled or Banished out of his Native Country but either by Authority of Parliament or in Case of Abjuration for Felony by the Common Law and so when our Books or any Record speak of Exile or Banishment other than in case of Abjuration it is to be intended to be done by Authority of Parliament as Belknap and other Judges c. Banished into Ireland in the Reign of Rich. the Second This is a Beneficial Law and is Construed benignly And therefore the King cannot send any Subject of England against his will to serve him out of this Realm for that should be an Exile and he should perdere Patriam No he cannot be sent against his will into Ireland to serve the King or his Deputy there because it is out of the Realm of England For if the King might send him out of this Realm to any
quam nolumus esse Arguendam By our Prerogative which we will not have disputed Yet such Protections have been argued by the Judges according to their Oath and Duty and adjuged to be void As Mich. 11 H. 7. Rot. 124. a Protection granted to Holmes a Vintrier of London his Factors Servants and Deputies c. Resolved to be against Law Pasch 7. H. 8. Rot. 66. such a Protection disallowed and the Sheriff amerced for not executing the Writ Mich. 13. and 14 Eiiz. in Hitchcocks Case and many other of latter time And there is a notable Record of Ancient time in 22 E. 1. John de Mershals Case Non pertinct ad vicecomitem de protectione Regis Judicare imo ad Curiam Justice or Right We shall not sell deny or delay Justice and Right neither the End which is Justice nor the Mean whereby we may attain to the End and that is the Law Right is taken here for Law in the same sence that Justice often is so called 1. Because it is the Right Line whereby Justice distributive is Guided and Directed and therefore all the Commissioners of Oier and Terminer of Gaol-delivery of the Peace c. have this Clause Facturi quod ad Justititiam pertinet secundum Legem Consuetudinem Angliae that is to do Justice and Right according to the Rule of the Law and Custom of England and that which is called Common Right in 2 E. 3. is called Common-Law in 14 E. 3. c. and in this sence it is taken where it is said Ita quod stat Rectus in Curia id est Legi in Curia 2. The Law is called Rectum because it discovereth that which is Tort Crooked or Wrong for as Right signifieth Law so Tort Crooked or Wrong signifieth Injuries and Injuria est contra Jus Injury is against Right Recta Linea est index sui obliqui a right line is both declaratory of it self and the oblique Hereby the Crooked Cord of that which is called Discretion appeareth to be unlawful unless you take it as it ought to be discretio est discernere per Legem quid sit Justum discretion is to discern by the Law what is Just 3. It is called Right because it is the best Birth-right the Subject hath for thereby his Goods Lands Wife and Children his Body Life Honour and Estimation are protected from Injury and Wrong Major Haereditas venit unicunque nostrum a Jure Legibus quam a Parentibus A greater Inheritance descends to us from the Laws than from our Progenitors Thus far the very words of that Oracle of our Law the Sage and Learned Coke which so fully and excellently explain this incomparable Law that it will be superfluous to add any thing further thereunto A Confirmation of the Charters of the Liberties of England and of the Forrest made in the 35th Year of Edw. the First EDward by the Grace of God King of England Lord of Ireland and Duke of Guyan to all those these present Letters shall hear or see Greeting Know ye that we to the Honour of God and of Holy Church and to the profit of our Realm have granted for us and our Heirs that the Charter of Liberties and the Charter of the Forrest which were made by Common Assent of all the Realm in the time of King Henry our Father shall be kept in every point without Breach And we will that the same Charter shall be sent under our Seal as well to our Justices of the Forrest as to others and to all Sheriffs of Shires and to all our other Officers and to all our Cities throughout the Realm together with our Writs in the which it shall be contained that they cause the aforesaid Charters to be published and to declare to the People that we have Confirmed them in all points And that our Justicers Sheriffs Majors and other Ministers which under us have the Laws of our Land to guide shall allow the same Charters pleaded before them in Jugdment in all their points that is to wit the Great Charter as the Common Law and the Charter of the Forrest for the Wealth of our Realm Chap. 2. And we will that if any Judgment be given from henceforth contrary to the points of the Charters aforesaid by the Justicers or by any other our Ministers that hold plea before them against the points of the Charters it shall be undone and holden for nought Cap. 3. And we will that the same Charters shall be sent under our Seal to Cathedral Churches throughout our Realm there to Remain and shall be read before the People two times by the Year Cap. 4. And that all Archbishops and Bishops shall pronounce the Sentence of Excommunication against all those that by Word Deed or Council do contrary to the foresaid Charters or that in any point break or undo them And that the said Curses be twice a Year ddenounced and published by the Prelates aforesaid And if the same Prelates or any of them be Remiss in the Denunciation of the said Sentences the Archbishop of Canterbury and York for the time being shall compel and distrain them to the Execution of their Duties in Form aforesaid Cap. 5. And for so much as divers People of our Realm are in fear that the Aids and Tasks which they have given to us beforetime towards our Wars and other Business of their own Grant or good Will however they were made might turn to a bondage to them and their Heirs because they might be at another time found in the Rolls and likewise for the prizes taken throughout the Realm by our Ministers We have granted for us and our Heirs that we shall not draw no such Aids Tasks nor Prises into a Custom for any that hath been done heretofore be it by Roll or any other Precedent that may be founden Cap. 6. Moerover we have granted for us and our Heirs as well to Archbishops Bishops Abbots Priors and other folk of Holy Church as also to Earls Barons and to all the Commonalty of the Land that for no business from henceforth we shall take such manner of Aids Tasks or Prises but by the common assent of the Realm and for the common profit thereof saving the Ancient Aids and Prises due and accustomed Cap. 7. And for so much as the more part of the Commonalty of the Realm find themselves sore grieved with the Maletot of Woolls that is to wit a Toll of Forty Shillings for every sack of Wooll and have made Petition to us for to Release the same We at their Request have clearly Released it and have granted for us and our Heirs that we shall not take such things without their common consent and good will saving to Us and Our Heirs the Custom of Woolls Skins and Leather granted before by the Commonalty aforesaid In Witness of which things we have caused our Letters to be Patent Witness Edward our Son at London the 10th of October and the Twenty
when they had them best 2. And if any Statutes have been made by Us and our Ancestors or any Customs brought in contrary to them or any manner of Article contained in this present Charter We Will and grant that such manner of Statutes and Customs shall be void and frustrate for evermore CHAP. V. Pardon granted to certain Offenders MOreover we have pardoned Humphrey Bohun Earl of Hereford and Essex Constable of England Roger Earl of Norfolk and Suffolk Marshal of England and other Earls Barons Knights Esquires and namely John de Ferrariis with all other being of their Fellowship Consederacy and Bond and also of other that hold 20 l. Land in our Realm whether they hold of us in Chief or of others that were appointed at a day certain to pass over with us into Flanders the Rancour and Evil will born against us and all other Offences if any they have committed against us unto the making of this present Charter CHAP. VI. The Curse of the Church shall be Pronounced against the Breakers of this Charter ANd for the more assurance of this thing we will and grant that all Archbishops and Bishops for ever shall read this present Charter in Cathedral Churches twice in the Year and upon the Reading thereof in every of their Parish-Churches shall openly Denounce accursed all those that willingly do procure to be done any thing contrary to the tenour force and effect of this present Charter in any point and article In witness of which thing we have set our Seal to this present Charter together with the Seals of the Archbishops Bishops which voluntarily have sworn that as much as in them is they shall observe the tenour of this present Charter in all Causes and Articles and shall extend their faithful Aid to the keeping thereof c. The Comment THe word Tallage is derived from the French word Tailler to share or cut out a part and is Metaphorically used for any Charge when the King or any other does cut out or take away any part or share out of a Mans Estate and being a general word it includes all Subsidies Taxes Tenths Aids Impositions or other Charges whatsoever The word Maletot signifies an Evil that is an unjust Toll Custom Imposition or Sum of Money The occasion of making this Statute was this King Edward being injured by the French King resolves to make War against him and in order thereunto requires of Humphrey le Bohun Earl of Hereford and Essex and Constable of England and of Roger Bigot Earl of Norfolk and Suffolk and Marshal of England and of all the Earls Barons Knights Esquires and Freeholders of 20 l. Land whether they held of him in Capite to contribute towards such his expedition that is to go in Person or find sufficient Men in their places in his Army which the Constable and Marshal and many of the Knights and Esquires and especially this John Ferrers taking part with them and all the Freemen stoutly denyed unless it were so ordained and determined by common consent in Parliament according to Law And it seems the contest grew so hot that Baker's Chronicle Folio 99. relates a strange Dialogue that pass'd between them viz. That when the Earl Marshal told the King That if his Majesty pleased to go in Person he would then go with him and march before him in the Van-Guard as by right of Inheritance he ought to do but otherwise he would not stir the King told him plainly he should go with any other though he went not in Person I am not so bound saith the Earl neither will I take that Journey without you The King swore By God Sir Earl you shall either go or Hang And I swear by the same Oath said the Earl I will neither go nor Hang. And so the King was forc'd to dispatch his expedition without them And yet saith my Lord Coke altho the King had conceived a deep displeasure against the Constable Marshal and others of the Nobility Gentry and Commons of the Realm for denying that which he so much desired yet for that they stood in defence of their Laws Liberties and free Customes the said King Edward the First who as Sir William Herle Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas who lived in his time and served him said in the time of King Edward the 3d. was the wisest King that ever was did after his return from beyond the Seas not only consent to this Statute whereby all such Tallages and Impositions are forbidden for the future but also passes a Pardon to the said Nobles c. of all Rancour Ill-will and Transgressions If any they have committed which last words were added lest by acceptance of a Pardon of Transgression they should implicitely confess that they had Transgressed so careful were the Lords and Commons in former times to preserve the Ancient Laws Liberties and free Customs of their Country But note these words Si quas fecerint If any they have committed are left out in all the Printed Books of Statutes but they are in this Statute recited by Coke in his second Book of Institutes Fo. 535. and specially noted which he would never have done if it had not been so in the Rolls And since 't is probable them may be many more like Omissions Mistakes or Falsifications crept into the Prints and for that the R●●●●d not the printed Satute-Book varying from the Records is the Law It were to be wished that all the Rolls of Acts of Parliament were carefully by some Persons of Learning and Integrity view'd and Compared with the Prints and notice taken of all such Var●●tions and of Errors committed in the Translations and of any Statutes of a publick Import if in force that were never printed and the same to be made publick Anno 25 Edw. 3. CAP. II. A Declaration what Offences shall be adjudged Treason WHereas diverse opinions have been before this time in what Case Treason shall be said and in what not 2. The King at the Request of the Lords and of the Commons hath made a declaration in the manner as hereafter followeth that is to say When a Man doth Compass or Imagine the Death of our Lord the King or of our Lady his Queen or of their eldest Son and Heir 3. Or if a man do violate the Kings Companion or the Kings Eldest Daughter unmarried or the Wife of the Kings Eldest Son and Heir 4. Or if a Man do Levy War against our Lord the King in his Realm or be Adherent to the Kings Enemies in his Realm giving them Aid and Comfort in the Realm or elsewhere and thereof be provably Attainted of open Deed by the People of their Condition 5. And if a Man Counterfeit the Kings Great or Privy-Seal or his Money 6. And if a Man bring false Money into this Realm Counterfeit to the Money of England as the Money called Lushburgh or other like to the said Money of England knowing the Money to be false to Merchandise
or make payment in deceit of our said Lord the King and of his People 7. And if a Man Slay the Chancellor Treasurer or the Kings Justice of the one Bench or the other Justices in Eyre or Justices of Assize and all other Justices Assigned to Hear and Determine being in their Places doing their Offices 8. And it is to be understood that in the Cases above rehearsed that ought to be judged Treason which extends to our Lord the King and of his Royal Majesty 9. And of such Treason the Forfeiture of the Escheats pertaineth to our Lord as well of the Lands and Tenement holden of other as of himself 10. And moreover there is another manner of Treason that is to say when a Servant slayeth his Master or a Wife her Husband or when a Man Secular or Religious slayeth his Prelate to whom he oweth Faith and Obedience 11. And of such Treason the Escheats cught to pertain to every Lord of his own Fee 12. And because that many other like Cases of Treason may happen in time to come which a man cannot think nor declare at this present time it is Accorded That if any other Case supposed Treason which is not above specified doth happen before any Justices the Justices shall tarry without any going to Judgment of the Treason till the Cause be shewed and declared before the King and his Parliament whether it ought to be judged Treason or other Felony 13. And if percase any Man of this Realm Ride Armed covertly or secret with Men of Arms against any other to Slay him or Rob him or Take him or Retain him till he hath made Fine or Ransome for to have his deliverance it is not the mind of the King nor his Council that in such Case it shall be judged Treason but shall be judged Felony or Trespass according to the Laws of the Land of old time used and according as the Case requireth 14. And if in such Case or other like before this time any Justices have judged Treason and for this cause the Lands and Tenements have come into the Kings hands as forfeit the chief Lords of the Fee shall have the Escheats of the Tenements holden of them whether that the same Tenements be in the Kings hands or in others by Gift or in other manner 15. Saving always to our Lord the King the Year and the Waste and the sorfeitures of Chattels which pertain to him in the Cases above named 16. And that the Writs of Scire Facias be granted in such Case against the Land-Tenants without other Original and without allowing any Protection in the said Suit 17. And that of the Lands which be in the Kings hands Writs be granted to the Sheriffs of the Counties where the Lands be to deliver them out of the Kings hands without delay The Comment TReason is derived from Trabir which signifies Treacherously to betray when it concerns the Government and the Publick 't is called High Treason but against particular Persons as a Wife killing her Husband a Servant his Master c. it is Petty Treason High Treason in the Civil Law is called Crimen Laesae Majestatis a Crime wronging Majesty but in our Common-Law-Latine Alta proditio and in an Indictment for this offence the word Proditorie must be in Before the making this Act so many things were charged as High Treason That no Man knew how to behave himself Now by this Statute the particulars of that Grand Crime are reckoned up and all others excluded till declared by Parliament And the settling of this Affair was esteemed of such Importance to the Publick-Weal That the Parliament wherein this Act passed was called long after Benedictum Parliamentum the Blessed Parliament The substance of this Statute is branched out by my Lord Cook 3d. part of Instit. Fol. 3. into six Heads viz. The first concerning Death by compassing or imagining the death of the King Queen or Prince and declaring the same by some Overt Deed. By killing and murdering of the Chancellor Treasurer Justices of either Bench Justices in Eyre Justices of Assize Justices of Oier and Terminer In their Places doing their Offices The second is to Violate that is to Carnally know the Queen the Kings Eldest Daughter unmarried the Princes Wife The third is Levying War against the King The fourth is Adhering to the Kings Enemies within the Realm or without and declaring the same by some overt Act. The fifth is Counterfeiting of the Great the Privy Seal or the Kings Coin The sixth and last by bringing into this Realm Counterfeit Mony to the likeness of the Kings Coin Now as to the particular Exposition of the several parts of this Statute 1. When a man doth compass c. in the Original it is Quant Home which extends to both Sexes but one that is Non compos mentis or an Infant within the Age of discretion is not included but all Allens within the Realm of England being thereby under the Kings Protection and owing a Local Allegiance if they commit Treason may be punisht by this Act but otherwise it is of an Enemy 2. To compass and Imagine Is to contrive design or intend the death of the King but this must be declared by some Overt Act. But declaring by an open Act a design to Depose or Imprison the King is an Over Act to manifest the compassing his death For they that will depose their King will not stick to Murder him rather than fail of their end and as King Charles the First excellently observed and lamentably experienced There are commonly but few steps between the Prisons and the Graves of Princes 3. By the word King is intended 1. A King before his Coronation as soon as ever the Crown descends upon him for the Coronation is but a Ceremony 2. A King de Facto and not de Jure is a King within this Act and a Treason against him is punishable thô the Right Heir get the Crown 3. A Titular King as the Husband of the Queen is not a King within this Act but the Queen is for the word King here includes both Sexes 4. What is to be understood by the Kings Eldest Son and Heir within this Act I answer 1. A second Son after the death of the first Born is within the Act for he is then Eldest Secondly The Eldest Son of a Queen Regnant is as well within the Statute as of a King Thirdly The Collateral Heir Apparent or Presumptive is not within this Statute Roger Mortimer Earl of March was in Anno Dom. 1487. 11 Rich. 2. Proclaimed Heir Apparent Anno 39. Hen. 6. Richard Duke of York was likewise Proclaimed Heir Apparent and so was John de la Poolen Earl of Lincoln by Rich. 3. And Henry Marquess of Exeter by King Henry the 8. But none of these or the like are within the Purview of this Statute saith my Lord Coke 3 Instit fol. 9. 5. Note Whereas in the Printed Statute-Books it is there
said probably Attainted the same is a great error For the words of the Record are Et de ceo PROVABLEMENT soit Attaint And shall be thereof PROVABLY Attaint And I cannot but admire that such a Gross mistake should be suffered since my Lord Coke has so expresly observed the difference in these words following 3 Instit fol. 12. In this Branch says he four things are to be observed 1. This word Provablement Provably that is upon direct and manifest proof not upon Conjectural presumptions or Inferences or strains of Wit but upon good and sufficient proof And herein the Adverb Provablement provably hath a great force and signifieth a direct and plain proof which word the King the Lords and Commons in Parliament did use for that the offence was hainous and was so heavily and severely punished as none other the like and therefore the offender must Provably be Attainted which words are as forcible as upon direct and manifest proof Note the word is not Probably for then Commune Argumentum might have served but the word is Provably be Attainted Secondly This word Attaint necessarily implyeth that he be proceeded with and Attainted according to the due Course and proceedings of Law and not by Absolute power or by other means as in former times had been used And therefore if a Man doth adhere to the Enemies of the King or be slain in open War against the King or otherwise die before the Attainder of Treason he forfeiteth nothing because as this Act saith he is not Attainted wherein this Act hath altered that which before this Act in Case of Treason was taken for Law And the Statute of 34 E. 3. Cap. 12. saves nothing to the King but that which was in Esse and pertaining to the King at the making of that Act. And this appeareth by a Judgment in Parliament in Ann. 29. H. 6. Cap. 1. That Jack Cade being slain in open Rebellion could no way be punished or forfeit any thing and therefore was Attainted by that Act of High Treason Thirdly Of open Deed per Apertum Factum these words strengthen the former Exposition of Provablement an Overt Act must be alledged in every Indictment upon this Act and proved Compassing by bare words is not an Overt Act as appears by many Temporary Statutes against it But there must be some open Act which must be manifestly proved As if divers do Conspire the Death of the King and the manner how and thereupon provide Weapons Powder Poison Harness send Letters or the like for the Execution of the Conspiracy If a Man be Arraigned upon an Indictment of High Treason and stand Mute that is refuse to Plead he is not to be Pressed to death but shall have the same Judgment and incurr such forfeiture as if he had been Convicted by Verdict or had confessed it For this standeth well with this word Provablement for fatetur facinus qui judicium fugit But otherwise it is in case of Petit Treason Murder or other Felony If a Subject Conspire with a Forreign Prince to Invade the Realm by open Hostility and prepare for the same by some Overt Act this is a sufficient Overt Act for the death of the King Fourthly The Composition and Connexion of the words are to be observed viz. Thereof be Attainted by open Deed This as was resolved by the Justices in Easter Term 35 of Eliz. relateth to the several and distinct Treasons before expressed and specially to the Compassing and Imagination of the death of the King c. for that is a secret in the Heart and therefore one of them cannot be an Overt Act for another as for example A Conspiracy is had to Levy War this as hath been said and so resolved is no Treason by this Act until it be levied therefore it is no Overt Act or manifest proof of the Compassing the Death of the King within this Act for the Words are de ceo c. thereof that is of the Compassing of the death Divers latter Acts of Parliament have Ordained That compassing by bare Words or Sayings should be Treason but are all either Repealed or Expired except only that of the 12 Car. 2. herein after recited which is only to be in force during the Life of his present Majesty whom God preserve And it was wont to be said bare Words may make an Heretick but not a Traitor without an Overt Act. And the Wisdom of the Makers of this Law would not make Words only to be Treason seeing such variance commonly amongst the Witnesses is about the same as few of them agree together But if words be set down in Writing by the Delinquent himself That is a sufficient Overt Act within this Statute In the Preamble of the Statute of 1 Mar. concerning the Repeal of certain Treasons declared after this Statute of the 25. of Edw. 3. and before that time and bringing back all things to the measures of this Statute It is agreed by the whole Parliament That Laws justly made for the preservation of the Common-wealth without extream punishment are more often obeyed and kept than Laws and Statutes made with great and extream punishments And in special such Laws and Statutes so made whereby not only the ignorant and rude unlearned People but also learned and expert People minding honesty are oftentimes trapped and snared yea many times for Words only without other Fact or Deed done or perpetrated Therefore this Act of 25 Edw. 3. doth provide that there must be an Overt Act. But words without any Overt Act are to be punisht in another degree as an high Misprision By People of their condition That is per Pares by their Equals 7. As to Treason by Levying War against the King we must note that thô Conspiring or Compassing to Levy War without a War de Facto be no Treason yet if many Conspire a War and only some few Actually Levy it all are guilty of the Treason Raising a Force to burn or throw down a particular Inclosure is only a Riot but if it had been to have gone from Town to Town to throw down all Inclosures or to change Religion or the like it were Levying of War because the intended mischief is Publick Holding a Fort or Castle against the Kings Forces is Levying of War 8. As touching the Interpretative Treasons by Killing the Chancellor Treasurer Justice of one or the other Bench Justice in Eyre or of Assize or Oier and Terminer Note 1. This extends but only to the Persons here named not to the Lord Steward Constable or Marshal or Lords of Parliament Secondly It extends to those only during their Office Thirdly It extends only to Killing not Wounding without Death But by the Stat. 3 H. 7. C. 14. Compassing to Kill the King or any of his Council is made Felony 9. Counterfeiting the Great or Privy Seal is Treason but it must be an Actual Counterfeiting thereof Compassing to do it is no Treason Affixing the Great Seal by
whereupon he demanded Judgment whether the Plaintiffe ought to maintain that Appeal he had brought To which the Plaintiffe demurred in Law And in this Case three points were adjudged by Sir Christopher Wray Sir Thomas Gawdy and the whole Court First That the matter of the Bar had been a good Bar of the Appeal by the Common Law as well as if the Clergy had been Allowed For that the Defendant upon his Confession of the Indictment had prayed his Clergy which the Court ought to have granted and the deferring of the Court to be advised ought not to prejudice the Party Desendant albeit the Appeal was Commenced before the Allowance of it The second point adjudged was that this Case was out of the Statute of 3 Hen. 7. For that the words of that Act are If it fortune that the same Felons and Murderers and Accessaries so Arraigned or any of them to be Acquitted or the Principal of the said Felony or any of them to be Attainted the Wife or next Heir of him so slain c. may have their Appeal of the same Death and Murder against the Person so Acquitted or against the said Principals so Attainted if they be alive and that THE BENEFIT OF HIS CLERGY THEREOF before be not had And in this the Defendant Holcroft was neither Acquitted nor Attainted but Convicted by Confession and the Benefit of the Clergy only prayed as is aforesaid so as the Statute being penal concerning the Life of Man and made in Restraint of the Common Law was not to be taken by Equity but is Casus Omissus a Case Omitted and left to the Common Law As to the Third is was objected that every Plea ought to have an apt Conclusion and that the Conclusion in this Case ought to have been Et petit judicium si praediit Thomas Holcroft Iterum de eadem morte de qua semel Convictus fuit Respondere compelli debeat And he does ask judgment if the above mentione Thomas Holcroft shall be obliged to answer againe for the same death he was once Convicted of But it was adjudged that either of both Conclusions was sufficient in Law And therefore that exception was disallowed by the Rule of the Court. Note the ancient Law was that when a Man had judgment to be hanged in an Appeal of Death that the Wife and all the Blood of the Party slain should draw the Defendant to Execution and Gascoigne said Issint fuit in diebus nostris so it was done in our Days And thus much occasionally about Appeals which we the rather inserted because the practice thereof through I know not whose negligence has been almost lost or forgot till some few Years ago a Woman in Southwark revived it against one that killed her Husband and got a pardon for it but she Prosecuted him on Appeal had judgment against him and he was Executed since which time the same Course has been frequently talkt of and brought but for the most part to the shame I think of those Women or Children who make such Compositions for their Husbands or Fathers Blood they have been by some secret Bargains or Compensations husht up and seldom effectually followed Two other Statutes of King Edw. 3. Anno 4. Edw. 3. cap. 14. A Parliament shall be holden once every year ITem It is accorded that a Parliament shall be holden every year once and more often if need be Anno 36. Edw. 3. cap. 10. A Parliament shall be holden once in the year ITem for maintenance of the said Articles and Statutes and Redress of dibers MISCHIEFS and GRIEVANCES which daily happen a Parliament shall be holden every year as another time was ordained by Statute The Comment BEfore the Conquest as the Victory of Duke William of Normandy over Harold the Usurper is commonly though very improperly called Parliaments were to be held twice every year as appears by the Laws of King Edgar cap. 5. and the Testimony of the Mirrour of Justices cap. 1. sect 3. For the Estates of the Realm King Alfred caused the Committees some English Translations of that ancient Book read Earls but the word seems rather to signifie Commissioners Trustees or Representatives to meet and ordained for a PERPETUAL USAGE that twice in the year or ostner if need were in time of Peace they should Assemble at London to speak their Minds for the guiding of the People of God how they should keep themselves from Offences live in quiet and have right done them by certain Vsages and sound Judgments King Edward the first says Cook 4. Instit fol. 97. kept a Parliament once every two years for the most part And now in this King Edward the Thirds time one of the wisest and most glorious of all our Kings It was thought fit to Enact by these two several Statutes That a Parliament should be held once at least every year which two Statutes are to this day in full Force For they are not Repealed but rather Confirmed by the Statute made in the 16th of our present Soveraign King Charles the Second Cap. 1. Intituled An Act for the Assembling and holding of Parliaments once in three years at the least The words of which are as follow Because by the ancient Laws and Statutes of this Realm made in the Reign of King Edward the third Parliaments are to be held very often your Majesties Humble and Loyal Subjects the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament Assembled most Humbly do beseech your most Excellent Majesty that it may be declared and Enacted 2 And be it declared and Enacted by the Authority aforesaid that hereafter the sitting and holding of Parliaments shall not be intermitted or discontinued above Three Years at the most but that within three years from and after the Determination of this present Parliament so from time to time within three years after the Determination of and other Parliament or Parliaments or if there be occasion more or oftner Your Majesty your Heirs and Successors do Issue out your Writs for calling Assembling and holding of another Parliament to the end there may be a frequent calling Assembling and holding of Parliaments once in three years at the least Agreeable to these good and wholsome Laws are those gracious Expressions and Promises in His Majesties Proclamation touching the Causes and Reasons of Dissolving the two last Parliaments Dated April 8. 1681. Irregularities in Parliament shall NEVER make us out of love with Parliaments which we look upon as the best Method for healing the distempers of the Kingdom and the only means to preserve the Monarchy in that due Credit and Respect which it ought to have both at home and abroad And for this Cause we are resolved by the blessing of God to have frequent Parliaments And both in and out of Parliament to use OUR UTMOST ENDEAVOURS TO EXTIRPATE POPERY and to Redress all the Grievances of our good Subjects and in all things to Govern according to the
great or highly in favour at Court but sooner or later they hit him and it proved his Ruine Take a few examples King Edw. the second dotes upon Pierce Gaveston a French Gentleman he wastes the Kings Treasures has undeserv'd Honours conserred on him affronts the antient Nobility The Parliament in the beinning of the Kings Reign Complains of him he is banisht into Ireland The King afterwards calls him home and marries him to the Earl of Glocesters Sister the Lords complain again so effectually that the King not only consents to his second Banishment but that if ever he returned or were found in the Kingdom he should be h●ld and proceeded against as an Enemy to the State Yet back he comes and is received once more by the King as an Angel who carries him with him into the North and hearing the Lords were in Arms to bring the said Gaveston to Justice plants him for safety in Scarborough Castle which being taken his Head was Chopt off In King Richard the Seconds time most of the Judges of England to gratifie certain corrupt and pernicious Favourites about the King being sent for to Nottingham were by Perswasions and Menaces prevailed with to give false and Illegal Resolutions to certain questions proposed to them declaring certain matters to be Treason which in truth were not so For which in the next Parliament they were called to Account and Attainted and Sir Robert Tresilian Lord Chief Justice of England was drawn from the Tower through London to Tyburn and there Hanged As likewise was Blake one of the Kings Council and Vske the Under-Sheriff of Middlesex who was to pack a Jury to serve the present Turn against certain Innocent Lords and others whom they intended to have had taken off and five more of the Judges were Banisht and their Lands and Goods forfeited And the Archibishop of York the Duke of Ireland and the Earl of Suffolk three of the Kings Evil Councellors were forced to fly and died miserable Fugitives in Forreign Parts In the beginning of King H. the 8ths Reign Sir Richard Empson Knight Edmond Dudley one of the Barons of the Exchequer having by colour of an Act of Parliament to try People for several Offences without Juries committed great oppressions were proceeded against in Parliament and lost their Heads In the 19 Year of the Reign of King James at a Parliament holden at Westminister there were shewn saith Bakers Chron. Fo. 418. two great Examples of Justice which for future Terrour are not unfit to be here related one upon Sir Giles Mompesson a Gentleman otherwise of Good parts but for practising sundry abuses in erecting and seting up new Inns and Ale-houses and exasting great Summes of Money of people by pretence of Letters Patents granted to him for that purpose was sentenced to be degraded from his Knighthood and disabled to Bear any Office in the Common-Wealth though he avoided the Execution by Flying the Land But upon Sir Francis Mitchel a Justice of Peace of Middlesex and one of the Chief Agents the sentence of Degradation was Executed and he made to ride with his face to the Horse tail through the City of London The other Example was of Sir Francis Bacon Viscount St. Albans Lord Chancellour of England who for Bribery was put from his place and Committed to the Tower In King Charles the firsts time most of the Judges that had given their opinions contrary to Law in the Case of Ship-Money were call'd to Account and forced to Fly for the same And in the 19th year of our present Sovereign the Earl of Clarendon Lord Chancellour of England being questioned in Parliament and retiring thereupon beyond the Seas was by a special Act Banished and Disabled In a word it was well and wisely said of that excellent Statesman Sir William Cecil Lord Burleigh and High Treasurer of England That he knew not what an Act of Parliament might not doe which Apothegm was approved by King James and alleadged as I remember in one of his published Speeches And as the Jurisdiction of this Court is so transcendent so the Rules and Methods of Proceedings there are different from those of other Courts For saith Cook 4. Instit fo 15. As every Court of Justice hath Laws and Customs for its Direction some by the Common Law some by the Civil and Canon Law some by Peculiar Laws and customes c. So the High Court of Parliament suis propriis Legibus Consuetudinibus Subsistit Subsists by it's own Peculiar Laws and Customs It is Lex Consuetudo Parliamenti the Law and Custom of Parliament that all weighty matters in any Parliament moved concerning the Peers or Commons in Parliament assembled ought to be determined adjudged and discussed by the Course of the Parliament and not by the Civil Law not yet by the Common Laws of this Realm used in more Inseriour Courts Which was so declared to be Secundum Legem Consuetudinem Parliaments according to the Law and Custom of Parliament concerning the Peers of the Realm by the King and all the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the like pari ratione for the same reason is for the Commons for any thing moved or done in the House of Commons and the rather for that by another Law and Custom of Parliament the King cannot take notice of any thing said or done in the House of Commons but by the Report of the House of Commons and every Member of the Parliament hath a Judicial place and can be no Witn●●● And this is the Reason that Judges ought not to give any opinion of a Matter of Parliament because it is not to be decided by the Common Laws but Secundum Legem Consuetudinem Parliamenti according to the law and Custom of Parliament And so the Judges in diverse Parliaments have confessed And some hold that every offence Committed in any Court panishible by that Court must be punished proceeding Criminally in the same Court or in some higher and not any Inferiour Court and the Court of Parliament hath no higher Thus Cook Great complaints have been made about a late House of Commons sending for some Persons into Custody by their Serjeant at Arms but certainly they did no more therein then what their Predecessiors have often done every Court must be supposed Armed with a power to desend it self from Affronts and Insolencies In all Ages when the House has appointed particular Committees hath it not been usual to order that they shall be impower'd to send for Papers Persons and Records But to bring Men to a sober Consideration of their Duty and Danger I shall give a few Instances besides those before mentioned of what the House of Commons hath done in former Ages 1. Anno 20. Jacobi Doctor Harris Minister of Bletchingly in Surry for misbehaving himself by Preaching and otherwise about Election of Members of Parliament upon complaint was called to the Bar of the House of Commons and there as a Delinquent on his Knees
Disgrace Trouble Damage danger of Life and makes him liable to Outlawry Imprisonment and every thing but Death it self and that too for ought you know may wrongfully be occasion'd by it your rash Verdict gaining Credit and giving Authority to another Jury to find him Guilty for if the Petty Jury find a man Guilty never so unjustly the Law suffers no Attaint or other Punishment to lie against them for this very reason because another Jury viz. the Grand Inquest as well as they have found him Guilty If a Grand Jary find a Bill wrongfully against a person and it prove never so much to his damage he has no Remedy for being upon their Oaths the Law will not suppose any malice One of the Grand Jury cannot afterwards be of the petty Jury and why Because says the Law he has once already found the party Guilty and if he should not again he must perjure himself From all which it appears what a weigh and stress the Law puts upon the Verdict of a Grand Jury and 't is remarkable too that the Law directs them only to say either Billa vera It is true Or Ignoramus We know not and never That it is not true Which shews That if they be doubtfull or not fully satisfied The Indictment must be Endorsed not Billa Vera We know 't is true but Ignoramus We doubt it We do not know it We are not certain it be true If they find a Bill where they ought not they wound their own Consciences and do an irreparable damage to the party but where they do not find the Bill there is no harm done to any body for another Indictment may be brought when there is better Evidence SECT IV. That Juries are Judges of Law in some respects as well as Fact AMongst other devices to undermine the Rights and Power of Juries and render them Insignificant there has an opinion been advanced That they are only Judges of Fact and are not at all to Consider the Law so that if a Person be Indicted for a Fact which really is no Crime in it self by Law but is workt up by Words of form as Treasonably Seditiously c. if the Fact be but proved to be done though the said wicked Circumstances do not appear they shall be supplied by the Law which you are not to take notice of but find the Bill or bring in the Person Guilty and leave the Consideration of the Case in Law to the Judges whose business it is Thus some people argue but this is an apparent Trapp at once to Perjure Ignorant Juries and render them so far from being of good use as to be only Tools of Oppression to Ruine and Murder their Innocent Neighbours with the greater Formality For though it be true that matter of Fact is the most common and proper Object of a Juries determination and matter of Law that of the Judges yet as Law arises out of and is complicated with Fact it cannot but fall under the Juries Consideration Littleton Sect. 368. teaches us That the Jury may at their Election either take upon them the Knowledge of the Law and Determine both the Fact and Law themselves or else find the matter specially and leave it to the Judges 'T is by applying matter of Fact and Law together and from their due Consideration of and right Judgment upon both that a Jury brings forth their Verdict Do we not see in most General Issues as upon Not Guilty pleaded in Trespass breach of the Peace or Felony though it be matter in Law whether the party be a Trespasser a breaker of the Peace or a Felon yet the Jury do not find the Fact of the Case by it self leaving the Law to the Court but find the party Guilty or Not Guilty generally so that though they Answer not to the Question singly what is Law yet they determine the Law in all matters where Issue is Joined Is it not every dayes practice when persons are Indicted for Murther the Jury does not only find them Guilty or Not Guilty but many times upon hearing and weighing of Circumstances brings them in either Guilty of the Murder or else only of Man-slaughter per misadventure or se defendendo as they see Cause Besides as Juries have ever been vested with such Power by Law so to exclude them from or Disseize of the same were utterly to Defeat the End of their Institution For then if a person should be Indicted for doing any Common Innocent Act if it be but Cloathed and disguised in the Indictment with the name of Treason or some other High Crime and proved by Witnesses to have been done by him the Jury though satisfied in Conscience that the Fact is not any such offence as 't is called yet because according to this fond Opinion they have no power to Judge of Law and the Fact charged is fully proved they should at this Rate be bound to find him Guilty And being so found the Judge may pronounce Sentence against him for he finds him a Convicted Traitor c. by his Peers And so Juries should be made meer Properties to do the Drudgery and bear the blame of unreasonable Prosecutions But all this is absur'd and abhorr'd by the Wisdom Justice and Mercy of our Laws In every Indictment Information c. there are certain words of Course called matter of form as Maliciously Seditiously with such and such an Intention c. And these sometimes are raised by a Just and reasonable Implication in Law and sometimes are thrust in meerly to raise a pretence or Colour of Crime where there is really none So that every Jury-man ought well to understand this Distinction where the Act or naked matter of Fact charged is in it self a Crime or offence against Law as killing of a Man Levying of War against the King c. there the Law does in pleadings require and will supply those words and if the Jury do find and are satisfied That the substance of the Charge is such a Crime and the person Guilty thereof they are bound to find it though no direct proof be made of those Circumstantials But where the Act or matter of Fact is in it self Innocent or Indifferent there the purport of these Words as that it was done maliciously or with such or such a design is necessary to be proved For else there is no Crime and consequently no fit matter to be put to Trial. In which Case the Grand Jury is bound in Conscience and Law to return an Ignoramus and a Petty Jury Not Guilty SECT V. That Juries are not finable or any way to be punisht under pretence of going contrary to Evidence or against the Judges Directions MUch of what we have said of Grand Juries is also applicable to Petty Juries so that we need not repeat it only must Answer one Objection Some Jury-men may be apt to say If we do not find according to Evidence though we have reason to suspect the truth of
thereby p. 205. What persons ought to be Jury men and how Qualified p. 209. Jurors in Antient Law-books call'd Judges p. 211. Of the Duty of Grand Juries p. 212. Their Oath p. 213. That Juries are Judges of Law in some respects as well as Fact p. 220. to p. 223. That Juries are not fineable or any way to be punished under pretence of going contrary to Evidence or against the Judges Directions p. 223. The Conclusion Bushels Case reported by the Learned Sir John Vaughan Licensed by the present Lord Chancellor the Lord Chief Justice North and all the Judges then in England THE PROEM THE Constitution of our English Government the best in the World is no Arbitrary Tyranny like the Turkish Grand Seignior's or the French Kings whose Wills or rather Lusts dispose of the Lives and Fortunes of their unhappy Subjects Nor an Oligarchy where the great ones like Fish in the Ocean prey upon and live by devouring the lesser at their pleasure Nor yet a Democracy or popular State much less an Anarchy where all confusedly are hail fellows well met But a most excellently mixt or qualified Monarchy where the King is vested with large Prerogatives sufficient to support Majesty and restrain'd only from Power of doing himself and his People harm which would be contrary to the very end of all Government and is properly rather weakness than power the Nobility adorn'd with Priviledges to be a Screen to Majesty and a refreshing Shade to their Inferiours and the Commonalty too so Guarded in their Persons and Properties by the fence of Law as renders them Free-men not Slaves In France and other Nations the meer Will of the Prince is Law his Word takes off any mans Head imposes Taxes or seizes any mans Estate when how and as often as he lists and if one be Accused or but so much as suspected of any Crime he may either presently Execute him or Banish or Imprison him at pleasure or if he will be so Gracious as to proceed by Form of their Laws if any two Villains will but swear against the poor Party his Life is gone Nay if there be no Witnesses yet he may be put to the Rack the Tortures whereof make many an Innocent Person confess himself Guilty and then with seeming Justice he is Executed or if he prove so stout as in Torments to deny the Fact yet he comes off with Disjoynted Bones and such Weakness as renders his Life a Burthen to him ever after But in England the Law is both the Measure and the Bond of every Subjects Duty and Allegiance each man having a fixed Fundamental Right born with him as to Freedom of his Person and Property in his Estate which he cannot be deprived of but either by his consent or some Crime for which the Law has Impos'd such a Penalty or Forfeiture For all our Kings take a solemn Oath At their Coronation to Observe and cause the Laws to be kept which was done by our present most Gracious Soveraign Likewise all our Judges take an Oath wherein amongst other points they swear To do equal Law and Right to all the Kings Subjects Rich and Poor and not to delay any Person of Common Right for the Letters of the King or of any other Person or for any other Cause But if any such Letters come to them they shall proceed to do the Law the same Letters notwithstanding Therefore saith Fortesoue who was first Chief Justice and afterwards Lord Chancellor to King Henry the 6th in his Book de Laudibus Legum Angliae cap. 9. Non potest Rex Angliae c. The King of England cannot alter nor change the Laws of his Realm at his pleasure For why he Governeth his People by Power not only Royal but also Politick If his Power over them were only Regal then he might change the Laws of his Realm and charge his Subjects with Tallage and other Burthens without their consent and such is the Dominion that the Civil Laws purport when they cry Quod principi plecuit Legis habet Vigorom The Princes pleasure has the force of a Law But from this much differeth the power of a King whose Government over his People is Politick For he can neither change Laws without the consent of his Subjects nor yet charge them with Impositions against their Wills Wherefore his People do frankly and freely enjoy and occupy their own Goods being Ruled by such Laws as they themselves desire Thus Fortescue with whom Accords Bracton a Reverend Judge and Law-Author in the Reign of King Henry the third saying Rex in Regno suo superiores habet Deum Legem The King in his Realm hath two Superiors God and the Law for he is under the Directive though not Coercive Power of the Law and on the same Score Judge Vaughan speaking of our Fundamental Laws which are Coeval with the Government sticks not to say The Laws of England were never the Dictates of any Conquerors Sword or the Placita or good Will and pleasure of any King of this Nation or to speak Impartially and Freely the Results of any Parliament that ever sate in this Land And the late cited Fortescue in his 13 chap. has a very apt similitude to Illustrate and Demonstrate this The Law says he taketh its name a Ligando to bind for thereby the Politick Body is knit and preserv'd together as the Natural Body by the Bones and Sinews and Members which retain every one their proper Functions And as the Head of a Body Natural cannot change his Sinews nor cannot deny or with-hold from his inferiour Members their peculiar Powers and several nourishments of Blood and Spirits no more can a King which is the Head of a Body Politick change the Laws of that Body nor withdraw from his People their proper Substance against their Wills and Consents in that behalf 'T is true the Law it self affirms The King can do no wrong which proceeds not only from a presumption that so Excellent a Person will do none But also because he Acts nothing but by Ministers which from the lowest to the highest are answerable for their doings so that it a King in Passion should command A. to kill B. without process of Law A. may yet be prosecuted by Indictment or upon an Appeal where no Royal Pardon is allowable and must for the same be Executed such Command notwithstanding This Original happy frame of Government is truly and properly call'd an English mans Liberty a Priviledge not to exempt from the Law but to be freed in Person and Estate from Arbitrary Violence and Oppression A greater Inheritance saith Judge Cook is deriv'd to every one of us from our Laws that from our Parents For without the former what would the latter signifie And this Birth-right of English-men shines most conspicuously in two things 1. Parliaments 2. Juries By the first the Subject has a share by his chosen Representatives in the Legislative or Law-making Power for
the Chancellor without Warrant is no Treason Fixing a new Great Seal to another Patent is a great Misprision but no Treason being not a Counterfeiting within this Act But Aiders and Consenters are within this Act. The Counterfeiting of the Privy Signet or Sign Manual is no Treason within this Act but made by the Statute 1. Mar. c. 6. 10. Treason concerning Coin is either Counterfeiting the Kings Coin and this was Treason at Common Law and Judgment only as of Pettit Treason but Clipping c being made Treason by subsequent Statutes the Judgment is to be Drawn Hang'd and Quarter'd Money here extends only to the Proper Money of this Realm But now by the 1. M. c. 6. Forging or Counterfeiting Money made current by Proclamation is High Treason and by 14. Eliz. c. 3. Forging of Forreign Coin not current here is Misprision of Treason in the Forgers their Aiders and Abettors And not that the bare Forging of the Kings Coin without Uttering is Treason The second Offence concerning Money here declared to be Treason is If any person bring into this Realm Counterfeit Money Where note 1. It must be Counterfeit 2. Counterfeited to the similitude of English Money 3. It must be brought from a Forreign Realm and therefore not from Ireland 4. It must be brought knowingly 5. Brought and not barely uttered here But by the Statute De Moneta if false or clipt money be found in a persons hands and he be suspitious he may be Arrested till he can clear himself 6. He must merchandize therewith that is make payment thereof 11. As this Statute leaves all other doubtful matters to be declared Treason in Parliame●t but not to be punish'd as such till so declared So in succeeding Kings Reigns abundance of other matters were declared Treason which being found very grievous and dangerous by the Statute of 1 Mar. Cap. 1. it is Enacted That thenceforth no Act Deed or Offence being by Act of Parliament or Statute made Treason Petty Treason or Misprision of Treason by Words Writing Ciphering Deeds or otherwise however shall be taken had Deemed or Adjudged to be High-Treason Petty Treason or Misprision of Treason but only such as be declared and expressed to be Treason Petty Treason or Misprision of Treason by this Statute of the 25. Edw. 3. 12. The Offences made High Treason by Statutes since this first of Mary are as follow Refusing the Oath of Supremacy upon second Tender is Treason by 5. Eliz. Cap. 1. but no Corruption of Blood so likewise is Extolling the Power of the Bishop of Rome a Premunire and the bringing in of Bulls or putting them in Execution or Reconciling to the Church of Rome is Treason by the same Statute Bringing in Dei's is a Premunire 23. Eliz. C. 1. Also absolving Subjects from their Obedience or Reconciling them to the Obedience of Rome is Treason 27. Eliz. Cap. 2. So is it likewise for a Priest coming into England not submiting in two days The like for English men in Forreign Seminaries But Besides these Old Treasons since the happy Ret●uration of His Majesty The zealous regards his Subjects in Parliament had for the safety of his Sacred Person and Government thought sit to prefer and make the Statute following Anno Regni Car. 2. Regis decimo tertio CAP. I. An Act for Safety and Preservation of His Majesties Person and Government against Treasonable and Soditious Practises and Attempts THe Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament deeply Weighing and Considering the Miseries and Calamities of well high twenty years before your Majesties Happy Return and with●l Reflecting on the Causes and Occasions of so great and diplorable Confusions do in all humility and thankfulness acknowledge your Majesties incomparable Grace and Goodness to your People in your Free and General Pardon Indempnity and Oblivion by which roar Majesty hath been pleased to deliver your Subjects not only from the Punishment but also from the Reproach of their former Mi●carringes which unexempted Piety and Clemency of your Majestie hath Enflamed the Hearts of us your Subjects with an ardent desire to express all possible Zeal and Duty in the Care and Preservation of your Majesties Person in whose Honour and Happiness consists the good and welfare of your people and in preventing as much as may be all Treasonable and Sedititious Practises and Attempts for the time to come 2 And because the Growth and Increase of the late Troubles and Disorders did in a very great measure proceed from a multitude of Seditious Sermons Pamphlets and Speeches daily Preached Printed and Published with a Transcendent boldness defaming the Person and Government of your Majesty and your Royal Father wherein men were too much Encouraged and above all from a wilful mistake of the Supream and Lawful Authority whilst men were forward to cry up and maintain those Orders and Ordinances Oaths and Covenants to be Acts Legal and Warrantable which in themselves had not the least Colour of Law or Justice to support them from which kind of Distempers as the present Age is not wholly freed so Posterity may be apt to Relapse into them if a timely Remedy be not provided 3 We therefore the Lords and Commons in Parliament Assembled having duly considered the Premisses and Remembring that in the thirteenth year of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth of ever blessed Memory a right good and profitable Law was made for Preservation of Her Majesties Person do most humbly beseech your most Excellent Majesty that it may be Enacted 4 And be it Enacted by the Kings most Excellent Majesty by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords and Commons in this present Parliament Assembled and by Authority of the same That if any Person or Persons whatsoever after the four and twentieth day of June in the year of our Lord one thousand six hundred sixty and one during the Natural Life of our most Gracious Soveraign Lord the King whom God Almighty Preserve and Bless with a Long and Prosperous Reign shall within the Realm or without Compass Imagine Invent Devise or intend Death or Destruction or any Bodily Harm tending to the Death or Destruction Maim or Wounding Imprisonment or Restraint of the Person of the same our Soveraign Lord the King 5 Or to deprive or depose him from the Style Honour or Kingly Name of the Imperial Crown of this Realm or of any other His Majesties Dominions or Countries 6 To Levy War against His Majesty within this Realm or without 7 Or to move or stir any Forraigner and Strangers with force to Invade this Realm or any other His Majesties Dominions or Countries being under His Majesties Obeysance 8. And such Compassings Imaginations Inventions Devices or Intentions or any of them shall express utter or declare by any Printing Writing Preaching or malicious and advised Speaking being Lawfully Convicted thereof upon the Oaths of two Lawful and Credible Witnesses upon Tryal or otherwise Convicted or Attainted by due Course of Law then every
in good Sureties as Esquires or Gentlemen And that no pardon were granted but by Parliament Thirdly For that the King hath granted Pardons of Felonies upon false Suggestions it is provided that every Charter of Felony which shall be granted at the Suggestion of any the name of him that maketh the Suggestion shall be comprised in the Charter and if the Suggestion be found untrue the Charter shall be disallowed And the like provision is made by the Statute of 5. H. 4. Cap 2. for the Pardon of an Approver Fourthly It is provided that no Charter of Pardon for Murder Treason or Rape shall be allowed c. If they be not specified in the same Charter Statute 13. R 2. Before this Statute of 13. R 2. by the Pardon of all Felonies Treason was Pardoned and so was Murder c. At this day by the Pardon of all Felonies the death of man is not Pardoned These be excellent Laws for direction and for the Peace of the Realm But it hath been conceived which we will not question that the King may dispence with these Laws by a Non Obstante notwithstanding be it General or Special albeit we find not any such Clauses of non Obstante notwithstanding to dispense with any of these Statutes but of late times These Statutes are excellent Instructions for a Religious and Prudent King to follow for in these Cases Vt summae potestatis Regiae est posse quantum velit sic Magnitudinis est velle quantum possit As it is the highest Kingly power to be able to Act what he Wills so it is his Greatness and Nobleness to Will only what he lawfully can Hereof you may Read more in Justice Standford Lib. 2. Cap. 35. in diverse places of that Chapter of his grave Advice in that behalf Most certain it is that the Word of God has set down this undisputable General Rule Quia non profetur Cito Contra malos sententia filii hominum sine timore ullo perpetrant because Sentence against evil men is not speedily Executed therefore the hearts of the Children of men are set in them to do evil And thereupon the Rule of Law is grounded Spes Impunitatis Continuum Affectum tribuit delinquendi the hope of Impunity encourageth Offenders Et veniae facilitas Incentivum est Delinquendi and the facility of obtaining Pardon is an Incentive to Commit Offences This is to be Added that the Intention of the said Act of 13. R. 2. Was not that the King should grant a Pardon of Murder by express Name in the Charter but because the whole Parliament conceived that he would neuer Pardon Murder by special Name for the Causes aforesaid therefore that provision made which was as in other Cases I have observed grounded upon the Law of God Quicunque effuderit humanum sanguinem fundetur sanguis illius ad imaginem quippe Dei creatus est homo nec aliter Expiati potest nisi per ejus sanguinem qui alterius sanguinem effuderit whosoever shall shed mans blood by man also shall his blood be shed because man was Created after the Image of God neither can it be expiated otherwise then by his blood who spilt the blood of another And the words of every Pardon is after the Recital of the offence nos pietate moti c. we being moved with Piety c. But it can be no Piety to violate an express Law of God by letting Murder scape unpunisht Thus Coke whereby we see what opinion he had of such Pardons A brief digression concerning the Nature of APPEALS THis Discourse of Pardons puts us in mind of another kind of Legal Prosecution called an Appeal of which it may be very convenient to give the Reader some brief account You must know then for several Offences for which a man deserveth death and particularly for Murder there are two ways to bring him to Answer for the same one by Indictment which is at the Kings Suit and the other by Appeal which is at the Suit of a Party which is wronged or injured by the Murder as a Woman whose Husband or a Child or Brother whose Father or Brother is Killed Now upon an Indictment if the Offender be found Guilty because it s to be at the Suit of the King it has been said by some may be and too often a Pardon has been obtained tho even That too be against Law as appears by the Premisses But in an Appeal all agree the King can grant no Pardon Nay if a person be tryed by Indictment and Acquitted or Convicted and get a Pardon yet an Appeal may be brought and if he be thereupon Convicted notwithstanding such his former Acquital or Pardon he must be Hanged The word Appeal is derived from the French Verb Appeller to Call because he or she that brings it Calls the Defendant to Judgment but the meaning thereof is all one with An Accusation And is peculiarly in Legal signification applyed to Appeals of Three sorts First an Appeal brought by an Heir Male for some wrong done to his Ancestor whose Heir he is Secondly Of wrong done to an Husband and is by the Wife only if it be for the death of her Husband to be Prosecuted The third is of wrongs done to the Appellants themselvess as for Robbery Rape or Maim Coke 1. Instit Sect. 500. Note that this Appeal must be brought within a year and a day after the Murder is committed For afterwards it cannot be brought at all And antiently it was customary not to bring an Indictment for the King till after the year and the day waiting in the mean time for the Prosecution of the Party but this was found very inconvenient for the Party was frequently compounded with and at the years end the business was forgot and so Offenders escaped Justice And therefore the same was altered by the Statute 3. Hen. 7. Cap. 1. Whereby it is Enacted That the Coroner shall do his Office and the Offenders may be Arraigned at any time within the year at the Kings Suit but if Acquitted yet the party within the year and day should have liberty to bring an Appeal against such person either Acquitted or Attainted if the benefit of the Clergy be not before thereof had And in order thereunto that when any person happened to be Acquitted for the death of a man within the year the Justices before whom he is Acquitted shall not suffer him to go at large but either to remit him again to the Prison or else to let him to Bail after their discretion till that the day and the year be passed that so he may be forth coming to Answer an Appeal if it shall happen to be brought Thus that Statute as to the latter Clause whereof you see the Judges have power in Case of Acquittal to keep the Party in Prison still till the day and year be over Or else to admit him to Bail and tho this be left to their Discretion yet it must
not be such a Discretion as confounds all Discretion but they must weigh the Circumstances and go according to Law and Judgment and certainly the law intended such Bail if any be accepted should be bound Body for Body for otherwise it seems no security And therefore many wise men wondered the other day when Count Conning smark was Acquitted on the Indictment for the Barbarous Murder of Esquire Thynn that he was suffered to go so soon abroad for being a Stranger he was never like to come again into Enggland and being so rich what values he to discharge the Forfeitures of his Sureties Recognizances which likewise may be easily Compounded At most the Forfeieure is to the King and what is it that to the next Heir or Kinsman He is by this means Outed of his Legal Remedy to Revenge the Blood of his near and dear Relation Sed haec Obiter The form of an Appeal of Murder I C. Hic Instanter Appellat W. E. c. In English thus I here instantly Appeals W. F. of the death of his Brother H. C. For that whereas the aforesaid H. was in the Peace of God and the King at Tonbridge in the County of Rent the twenty eighth day of March in the thirty fourth year of the Reign of our Lord Charles the Second c. at seven a Clock in the Evening of the same Day cama the said W. F. as a Felon of our Lord the King in a premeditated Assault with Force and Arms c. And upon him the said H. C. then and there felonionsly an Assault did make and with a certain Sword of the price of twelve pence Which he then and there in his Right Hand did hold the aforesaid H. upon his Head did strike and one mortal wound of two Inches long in forepart of his Head even unto the Brain to the said H. did then and there Feloniously give of which said wound the said H for three days then next following did Languish and then viz. the such a day of such a month he there died or if the case be so Instantly died And so the said W. H. as a Felon of our Lord the King the aforesaid H. Feloniously did Kill and Murder against the Peace of our said Lord the King his Crown and Dignity And that this he did wickedly and as a Felon against the Peace of God and our Lord the King the aforesaid osters that the same be detained as the Court of our Lord the King shall think meet Diversity of Courts and Jurisdictions Written in the time of King Hen. 8. 1. Note That a women cannot now bring an Appeal for the death of any other Ancestors being baried there from by Magna Charta Cap. 34. whereas as you have heard it is provided that none shall be taken or Imprisoned upon the Appeal of any woman for the death of any Person but only of her Husband But she may at this day bring an Appeal of Robbery c. For wherein she is not by that Statute restrained Coke 2d Instit fol. 68. 2. The women that brings an Appeal for the death of her Husband must be his Wife not only de Facto but de Jure not only called and reputed or cohabiting with him but actually and legally Married to him and of such a Wife the Antient-Law-Books speaks de morte viri Inter Brachia sua Interfecti the Husband is killed within her Arms. that is whilst he was legally in her possession but that the Appellant and the person killed were not ever lawfully coupled in Matrimony is a good Plea in an Appeal 3. This Right of Appeal for the death of her Husband is annexed to her Widdow-hood as her Quarentine is and therefore if the Wife of the Dead Marry again her Appeal is gone even altho the second Husband should die within the year day after the Murder of the first For she must all the while before the Appeal be brought continue Faemini viri sui his Widdow upon whose death the Appeal is brought furthermore if she bring the Appeal during her Widdow-hood and take a Husband whilst it is depending the Appeal shall Abate that is be out of doors for ever Nay if on her Appeal she hath Judgment against the Defendant if afterwards she take an Husband before the Defendant be Hanged she can never have Execution of death against him 4. By the Statute of Glocest. made in the sixth year of King Edw. 1. Cap. 9. It is Enacted that if an Appeal set forth the Deed the year the day the hour the Reign of the King and the Town where the Deed was done and with what Weapon the Party was slain the Appeal shall stand in effect and shall not be abated for default of fresh Suit if the party shall Sue within the year and the day after the Deed done 5. As for the year and day here mentioned it is to be acconnted for the whole year according to the Calendar and not for twelve Months at twenty eight days to the Month. So likewise the day intended is a Natural day And this year and day must be accounted after the Felony and Murder Committed Now if a man be Mortally Wounded on the first day of May and thereof Languishes to the first day of June and then dies the Question here arises whether the year and the day allowed for bringing the Appeal is to be reckoned from the giving the Wound or the time of Death Some have held the former For that the Death ensuing hath Relation to it and that is the Cause of the Death and the Offender did nothing the day of the Death But the truth is the year and day shall be accounted only from the first of June the day of the Death for before that time no Felony was Committed and thus it hath often been resolved and Adjudged and the reason abovesaid grounded upon Relation which is a Fiction in Law holdeth not in this Case Coke 2. Ingit fol. 320. 6. If an Appeal of Murder be brought and depending the Suit and after the Year and Day is elapsed one become accessary to the Murder the Plaintiff shall have an Appeal against him after the Year and Day past after the Death but it must be brought within the Year and Day after this new Felony as accessary 7. If a Man be Indicted for Murder and Convicted only of Man-slaughter and have the Benefit of his Clergy it seems the Wife and Heir cannot afterwards bring their Appeal Touching which the Lord Cook 3 Instit Fo. 131. cites a Case in these words Thomas Burghe Brother and Heir of Henry Burghe brought an Appeal of Murder against Thomas Holcroft of the Death of the said Henry The Defendant pleaded that before the Coroner he was Indicted of Man-slaughter and before Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer he was upon that Indictment Arraigned and confessed the Indictment and prayed his Clergy and thereupon was Entred Curia advisare vult the Court will consider
Laws of the Kingdom A DIGRESSION touching the Antiquity Vse and Power of PARLIAMENTS and the Qualification of such Gentlemen as are fit to be chosen the Peoples Representatives THe Recital of these several Laws for frequent calling of Parliaments declaring the same to be of such Importance or Necessity to the safety and wel-being of the Nation Invites us to give the vulgar Reader some further Information touching those most Honourable Assemblies which though a digression will I hope be no Transgression for I am willing at any time to go a little out of my way provided I may thereby meet with the Readers profit and Advantage Of the Names and Antiquity of Parliaments THe word PARLIAMENT is French derived from the three words Parler la ment to speak ones mind because every Member of that Court should sincerely and discreetly speak his mind for the general good of the Common-Wealth and this name saith Cook 1 Instit fo 110. was used before William the Conquerer even in the time of Edward the Confessor But most commonly in the Saxons time it was called Michegemote or Witenage Mote that is the Great Mote Meeting or Assembly whence our Ward-Mootes in London receive their name to this day or the Wise-Moote that is the Assembly of the wise men and Sages of the Land But this word Parliament is used in a double sense 1. Strictly as it includes the Legislative Power of England as when we say An Act of Parliament and in this Acceptation it necessarily includes the King the Lords and the Commons each of which have a Negative Voice in making Laws and without their joint Consent no new Laws can pass that be obligatory to the Subject 2. Vulgarly the word is used for the Two Houses the Lords and Commons as when we say the King will call a Parliament his Majesty has Dissolved his Parliament c. The Lords of Parliament are divided into two sorts viz. Spiritual that is to say the Bishops who sit there in respect of their Baronies parcel of their Bishopricks which they hold in their Politick Capacity and Temporal The Commons are likewise divided into three Classes or parts viz Knights or Representatives of the Shires or Counties where note that though the Writ require two Knights to be chosen and that they are called Knights yet there is no necessity that they should actually have the degree of Knighthood provided they be but Gentlemen for the Statute 23 Hen. 6. cap 15 hath these words That the Knights of the Shires for the Parliament hereafter to be Chosen shall be not able Knights of the same Counties for which they shall be chosen OR OTHERWISE such Notable Esquires or Gentlemen born of the same Counties as shall be able to be Knights and no man to be such Knight which standeth in the degree of a Yeoman and under Secondly Citizens chosen to Represent Cities Thirdly Burgesses that is to say those that are chosen out of Boroughs Note that the difference between a City and a Borough is this a City is a Borough Incorporate which is or has within time of Memory been an Episcopal See or had a Bishop and this althô the Bishoprick be Dissolved as West minster having heretofore a Bishop though none now still remains a City Cook 1. Instit Sect 164. Boroughs are Towns Incorporated but such as never had any Bishops Of the Three Estates in Parliament THere has been a great debate about the Three Estates some zealously pleading That the Bishops are one of the three Estates of the Realm and the Lords Temporal a Second and the Commons-house the Third and the King over all as a Transcendent by himself Others as stifly deny this and assign the King as he his the Head of the Common Wealth to be the first Estate the Lords as well Spiritual as Temporal jointly to be the Second and the Commons-House the Third Non opis est nostrae tant as Componere Lites We shall not presume to undertake a decision of this arduous Controversy but in our poor opinion the matter seems to appear more difficult than really it is by means that the contending Parties do not first plainly set down what it is they severally mean by the word Estate Which may be taken 1. For a rank degree or Condition of Persons considered by themselves different in some notable Respects from others wherewith they may be compared And in this respect my Lords the Bishops may very properly be said to be an Estate or one of the Estates of the Realm for then there will be several Estates above the number of three for so in the House of Commons there may be said to be three Estates viz. Knights Citizens and Burgesses And heretofore in the days of Popery when there were 26 Abbots and Priors that held per Baroniam too as well as the Bishops called to the Parliament and sat in the Lords House see Fullers Church History Lib. 6. 292. Whether they being Religious and Monastical Persons whereas the Bishops were Seculars no small difference in their account might not as well claim to be a distinct Estate by themselves as now the Bishops do may be a question But secondly When we spake of three Estates in the Constitution of our English Government 't is most natural to mean and intend such a poize in the Ballance or such an Order or State as hath a Negative Voice in the Legislative Power For as the King and Commons excluding the Lords so neither the King and Lords excluding the Commons much less the Lords and Commons excluding the King can make any Law but this glorious Triplicity must be in mutual Conjunction and then from their united Influences spring our happy Laws But in this sence the Lords Spiritual by themselves have no pretence to be a distinct Estate That is they have by themselves no Negative Voice which I conceive the proper Characteristick or essential Mark of each of the three Estates For suppose a Bill pass the Commons and being brought into the Lords House all the 26 Bishops should be against it and some of the Temporal Lords yet if the other Temporal Lords be more in number than the Bishops and those that side with them the Bill shall pass as the Act of the whole house and if his Majesty please to give it his Royal Assent is undoubted Law Which demonstrates the Bishops have of themselves no Negative Voice and consequently are none of the three Estates of the Realm But if any will have them called an Estate and mean something else be it if he please to explain his Notion 't is like I shall not contend with him about a fiddle faddle word Touching the Power of the Parliament THe Jurisdiction of this Court saith Cook 1 Instit Sect. 164. is so Transcendent that it maketh Inlargeth Diminisheth Abrogateth Repealeth and reviveth Laws Statutes Acts and Ordinances concerning matters Ecclesiastical Civil Martial Marine Capital Criminal and common And 4 Instit Fol. 36.
The Power and Jurisdiction of the Parliament for making of Laws in proceeding by Bill is so transcendent and absolute as it cannot be confined either for Causes or Persons within any bounds Of this Court it is truely said Si Antiquitatem spectes est vetustissima si Dignitatem est Honoratissima si Jurisdictionem est capacissima if you regard its Original it is most Antient if its Dignity it is most Honourable if its Jurisdiction it is most Capacious Sir Thomas Smith a great Statesman and in high esteem and place under Queen Elizabeth in his Treatise de Republica Anglorum L. 2. Ca. 2. gives this Character of this supream Court In Commitiis Parliamentariis posita est omnis Augustae absolutaeque potestatis vis veteres leges jubent esse irritas novas inducunt Presentibus juxta ac futuris modum constituunt Jura possessiones hominum privatorum commutant Spurios natalibus restituunt cultum divinum sanctionibus corroborant Pondera mensuras variant JUS IN REGNO SVCCEDENDI PRESCRIBVNT c. The most high and absolute power of the Realm of England consisteth in the Parliament for the Parliament abrogateth old Laws maketh new giveth order for things past and for things hereafter to be followed changeth the rights and possessions of private men Legitimateth Bastards Corroborates Religion with Civil Sanctions Alters weights and Measures PRESCRIBES THE RIGHT OF SVCCESSION TO THE CROWN defines doubtfull Rights where there is no Law already made Appointeth Subsidies Taxes and Impositions giveth most Free pardons restoreth in Blood and Name c. As for the power of Parliaments over both Statute and Common Law take it in the Accurate and Significant words of a Parliament viz. the Statute of 25 Hen. 8. Ca. 21 as follows Whereas this Realm Recognizing no superiour under God but the King hath been and is free from Subjection to any mans Laws but only to such as have been devised made and ordained within this Realm for the wealth thereof or to such other as the people of this Realm have taken at their free Liberty by their own consent to be used amongst them and have bound themselves by long use and Custome to the observance of the same not to the observance of the Laws of any Forreign Prince Potentate or Prelate but as to the accustomed and Ancient Laws of this Realm originally established as Laws of the same by the said Sufferance Consents and Custom and none otherwise It standeth therefore with natural Equity and good Reason that all and every such Laws Humane made within this Realm or induced into this Realm by the said Sufferance Consents and Custom the King and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons Representing the whole State of the Realm in the most High Court of Parliament have full Power and Authority to dispouse with those and all other Humane Laws of the Realm and with every one of them as the quality of the Persons and matter shall require And also the said Laws and every of them to abrogate annull amplify or diminish as to the King Nobles and Commons of the Realm present in Parliament shall seem most meet and convenient for the Wealth of the Realm Thus far that notable Statute which in truth is only Declarative and in Affirmance of the Ancient Common Law of England The particular Business of Parliaments BY what hath been said you may perceive the work of an English Parliament is not as some would have it only to be Keys to unlock the peoples Purses That is but one part and perhaps one of the least parts too of their Office They are to propose new Laws that are wanting for general good and to press the Abrogation of Laws in being when the Execution of them is found prejudicial or dangerous to the publick They are to provide for Religion and the Safety and Honour of the Nation they have a power as you have heard from Sir Thomas Smith to order the Right to the Crown understand all this with the Kings consent and they have very frequently undertaken and actually Limited the same contrary to and different from the Common Line of Succession Nay by the Statute of the 13 Eliz. Cap 13. It is expresly Enacted That if any Person shall in any wise hold and affirm or maintain that the Queen with and by the Parliament of England is not able to make Laws and Statutes of sufficient force and validity to Limit and bind the Crown of this Realm and the Descent Limitation Inheritance and Government thereof or that this present Statute or any part thereof or any other Statute to be made by the Authority of the Parliament of England with the Royal Assent for Limiting the Crown is not are not or shall not or ought not to be for ever of good and sufficient Force and validity to bind limit restrain and Govern all Persons their Rights and Titles that in any wise may or might claim any Interest or Possibility in or to the Crown of England in Possession Remainder Inheritance Succession or otherwise howsoever and all other Persons whatsoever every Person so holding affirming or maintaining during the Life of the Queen shall be adjudged an high Traitor and suffer and forfeit as in Casts of High Treason is accustomed and every Person so holding affirming or maintaining after the d●c●ase of our said Sovereign Lady shall forfeit all 〈◊〉 Good and Chattels Which Clause and last mentioned Penalty is to this Day in force and ought to be considered by any who shall now pretend that an Act of Parliament cannot dispose of the Succession As for the Right of making War and Peace the same is gramted to be part of the High Prerogatives of our Kings yet the wisest of our Monarchs have very rarely entred into any War without the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Parliaments for 1. Who could give them better Counsel in such a difficult Affair 2. The People would more readily expose their Persons in such a War the Justice and Expediency whereof was approved by their Representatives 3. The King from thence might more certainly promise himself supplies of Money to carry on the same But nothing is more properly the work of a Parliament than to redress Grievances To take notice of Monopolies and oppressions to Curb the Exorbitances of pernicious Favourites and ill Ministers of State To punish such mighty Delinquents as look upon themselves too big for the ordinary reach of Justice to inspect the Conduct of such as are intrusted with Administration of the Laws or disposal of the publick Treasure of the Nation All Crimes of these and the like kinds are publick Nusances common mischiefs and wound the whole Body politick in a vital part and can scarce at all be sound out or Redressed by reason of the power and Influence of the Offenders but in this great and awful Senate before whom the haughtiest Criminals tremble and it has been observed that they scarce ever Prosecuted any though never so
had Judgment to confess his fault there and in the Countrey in the Pulpit of his Parish Church on Sunday before Sermon 2. Anno 21 Jacobi Ingrey under Sheriff of Cambridge-shire for refusing the Poll upon the promise of Sir Thomas Steward to defend him therein kneeling at the Bar received his Judgment to stand Committed to the Serjeant at Arms and to make Submission at the Bar and Acknowledge his offence there and to make a father Submission openly at the Quarter Sessions and there also to acknowledge his fault 3. Anno 20 Jacobi the Mayor of Arundel for misbehaving himself in an Election by putting the Town to a great deal of Charge not giving a due and General warning but Packing a number of Electors was sent for by Warrant and after ordered to pay all the Charge and the House appointed certain persons to adjust the Charges 4. And 3 Car. 1. Sir William Wray and others Deputy Lieutenants of Cornwal for assuming to themselves a power to make whom they pleas'd Knights and defaming those Gentlemen that then stood to be Chosen sending up and down the Countrey Letters for the Trained Bands to appear at the Day of Election and Menacing the Countrey under the Title of His Majesties pleasure had Judgment given upon them to be committed to the Tower 2. To make Recognition of their Offence at the Bar of the House upon their Knees which was done 3. To make a Recognition and submission at the Assizes in Cornwal in a Form drawn by a Committee 5. But most remarkable are the Proceedings in the same Parliament Anno 1628. against Doctor Manwaring who being there charged with Preaching and Publishing Offensive Sermons and the same referred to a Committee they brought in their Report which was delivered to the House with this Speech as I find it in Doctor Fullers Church-History L. 11. Fo. 129. Mr. Speaker I am to deliver from the Sub-Committee a Charge against Mr. Manwaring a Preacher and Doctor of Divinity but a Man so Criminous that he hath turned his Titles into Accusations for the better they are the worse is he that hath dishonoured them Here is a great Charge that lies upon him it is great in it self and great because it hath many great Charges in it Serpens qui Serpentem Devorat fit Draco his Charge having digested many Charges into it is become a Monster of Charges The main and great one is this a Plot and Policy to alter and subvert the Frame and Fabrick of this State and Commonwealth This is the great one and it hath others in it that gains it more Greatness For to this end he labours to infuse into the Conscience of his Majesty the perswasion of a Power not bounding it self with Laws which King James of famous memory calls in his Speech in Parliament 1619. Tyranny yea Tyranny accompanied with Perjury 2. He endeavours to perswade the Consciences of the Subjects That they are Bound to Obey Illegal Commands yea he Damns them for not Obeying them 3. He Robs the Subjects of the Property of their Goods 4. He Brands them that will not lose this Property with most Scandalous and Odious Titles to make them Hateful both to Prince and People so to set a Division between the Head and Members and between the Members themselves 5. To the same end not much unlike to Faux and his Fellows he seeks to Blow up Parliaments and Parliamentary-Power These five being duly viewed will appear to be so many Charges and withal they make up the main and great Charge a mischievous Plot to alter and subvert the Frame and Government of this State and Common-wealth And now that you may be sure that Mr. Manwaring though he leave us no propriety in our Goods yet he hath an absolute propriety in his Charge Audite ipsam Belluam hear Mr. Manwaring by his own words making up his own Charge Here he produced the Books particularly Insisting on p. 19 29 and 30. in the first Sermon p. 35 46 and 48. in the second Sermon all which passages he heightened with much Eloquence and Acrimony thus concluding his Speech I have shewed you an Evil tree that bringeth forth Evil fruit and now it rests with you to determine whether the following Sentence shall follow Cut it down and cast it into the Fire Four days after the Parliament proceeded to his Censure consisting of eight particulars it being ordered by the House of Lords against him as followeth 1. To be Imprisoned during the pleasure of the House 2. To be Fined a thousand Pounds 3. To make his Submission at the Bar in this House and in the House of Commons at the Bar there in Verbis Conceptis a set form of words framed by a Committee of this house 4. To be Suspended from his Ministerial Function three Years and in the mean time a sufficient Preaching-man to be provided out of the profits of his Living and this to be left to be performed by the Ecclesiastical Court 5. To be Disabled for ever hereafter from Preaching at Court 6. To be for ever Disabled of having any Ecclesiastical Dignity in the Church of England 7. To be Uncapable of any Secular Office or Preferment 8. That his Books are worthy to be Burned and his Majesty to be moved that it may be so in London and both the Vniversities And accordingly he made his humble Submission at both the Bars in Parliament on the Three and twentieth of June following and on his Knees before both Houses submitted himself with outward Expressions of Sorrow as followeth I do here in all sorrow of Heart and true Repentance acknowledge those many Errors and Indiscretions which I have committed in Preaching and Publishing the two Sermons of mine which I called Religion and Allegiance and my great fault in falling upon this Theam again and handling the same rashly scandalously and undavisedly in my own Parish Church in St. Giles in the Fields the Fourth of May last past I humbly acknowledge these three Sermons to have been full of Dangerous passages and Inferences and scandalous Aspersions in most part of them And I do Humbly acknowledge the Just proceedings of this Honourable House against me and the Just Sentence and Judgement pass'd upon me for my great Offence And I do from the bottom of my Heart crave Pardon of God the King and this Honourable House and the Common-Weal in general and those worthy Persons Adjuged to be reflected upon by me in particular for these great Ossences and Errors The truth is 't is this High Court of Parliament that only can hinder the Subject from being given up as a Prey to the Arbitrary Pleasure not only of the Prince if he should attempt it but which is Ten times worse to the unreasonable passions and lusts of Favourites cheif Ministers and Women when otherwise instead of a Monarch who as sometimes it may happen shall Govern but in name we might be ruled like the Antient French by an insolent
order to which we must consider for what ends they serve and they are principally Two The first is the preservation of our Religion from Popery the other is to preserve inviolable our Liberty and Property according to the known Laws of the Land without any giving way unto or Introduction of that Absolute and Arbitrary Rule practiced in Forreign Countreys which we are neither to imitate or regard Therefore 1. Take Care to Choose such as are well known to be men of good Consciences fearing God throughly Principled in the Protestant Religion and of high Resolution to maintain it with their Lives and Fortunes And amongst these rather cast your Favour upon themof large Principles I mean in matter of meer opinion such as will not sacrifice their Neighbours Property and Civil Rights to the frowardness of their own Party in Religion Narrow Souls that will own none but those that bear their own Image and superscription will sooner raise Persecution at home than secure us from Popery and Invasion from abroad The great Interest of England at this day is to Tolerate the Tollerable to bear with the weak to encourage the Conscientious and to restrain none but such as would restrain all besides themselves 2. As we ought as near as we can possibly judge to Elect good Protestants towards God and just towards men yet since in this Corrupt Age wherein we Live men are not so spiritual as they ought to be it is not amiss to seek for those whose spiritual Interest is seconded by a Temporal one For though men talk high and keep a great Noise with Conscience and love to their Country yet when you understand Mankind aright not as it should be but as it is and I fear ever will be then you will find that private Interest is the string in the Bears Nose it is that Governs the Beast And therefore the surest Champions for our Religion Caeteris Paribus against the Papacy are our Abby Landed-men for notwithstanding the Registred Dispensation to King Henry the Eighth from the Pope for the seizing of those Monasteries and Lands yet of late they pretend that the Pope had not Power to Alien them from the Church so that the present Possessors can never trust or rely upon that or any new promises or Actual Grants thereof especially from him whose everlasting and declared Maxime it is Never to keep Faith with Hereticks Undoubtedly to make easy his ascent into the Saddle he will proffer many Assurances and Grants but if these Abby-Landed men be not the most silly of all others they will never believe him For when he is once firmly setled then will he with his Canon-Law Distinctions like Fire under Quicksilver Evaporate away all his Promises and violently Resume the Lands glorying of his own Bounty if he require not the mean profits ever since they have been sacriligiously with-held from Holy Church 3. Endeavour to Chuse men of Wisdom and Courage who will not be Hectored out of their Duties by the Frowns and Scowles of men Never had you more need to pitch upon the old English Spirit that durst be faithfull and just against all Temptations What a degenerate Race have we known that could never yet Resist Smile or Frown but tamely sunk below their own Convictions and knew the Evil they did yet durst not but Commit it 4. Make it your business to Chuse such as are resolved to stand by and maintain the power and priviledges of Parliament for they are the Heart-strings of the Common-Wealth together with the power and just Rights of the King according to the Laws of the Kingdom so as the one may not Entrench upon the other And such as with a becoming true English Courage will Prosecute all Traitors whether already Impeached or to be Impeached And to secure us from Popery hereafter and to get removed all Corrupt and Arbitrary Ministers of State and wicked Judges and stiflers of the discovery of the Popish Plot and Suborners and vile Pamphleteers that endeavour so industriously to Clear the Papists and expose the Protestant Religion and poison the People Lastly Take particular notice of those who are men of Industry and Improvement for such as are Ingenious and laborious to propagate the growth and advantage of their Country will be very tender of yeilding to any thing that may weaken or Impoverish it If you Conduct yourselves thus prudently honestly and gallantly in your Choice without putting the Gentlemen whom you chuse to serve you to charges the consequence will be that as you will be sure to have a good Parliament when ever His Majesty shall please to call one and such as will be zealous for the safety of the Protestant Religion and prosperity of the Nation if they shall continue to sit and Act so on the other side If they should be Dissolv'd and never so many new Parliaments be called yet you run no hazard for the same Candidates will still be ready to serve you And so we shall conclude our discourse of Parliaments when I shall first have observ'd that antiently all Freemen of England though not Free-holders had a right to chuse their Representatives till the same was altered and limited by the following Statute for the reasons therein mention'd The Statute Anno 8. Hen. 6. Cap. 7. What sort of men shall be Chusers and who shall be Chosen Knights of the Parliament ITem whereas the Elections of Knights of Shires to come to the Parliaments of our Lord the King in many Counties of the Realm of England have now of late been made by very great Outragious and Excessive numbers of People dwelling within the same Counties of the Realm of England of the which most part was of people of small Substance and of no value whereof every one of them pretended a voice Equivalent as to such Elections to be made with the most worthy Knights and Esquires dwelling within the same Counties whereby Man Slaughter Riots Batteries and Divisions among the Gentlemen and other People of the same Counties shall very likely rise and be unless convenient and due Remedy be provided in this behalf 2 our Lord the King considering the premises hath provided ordained and stablished by Authority of this present Parliament that the Knights of the Shires to be chosen within the said Realm of England to come to the Parliament of our Lord the King hereafter to be holden shall be chosen in every County of the Realm of England by People dwelling and resident in the same Counties whereof every one of them shall have Landor Tenement to the value of forty Shillings by the year at the least above all Charges 3 and that they which shall be so chosen shall be dwelling and resident within the same Counties 4 and such as have the greatest number of them that may expend forty shillings by the year and above as afore is said shall be returned by the Sheriffs of every County Knights for Parliament by Indentures sealed
any Offence after the first Judgment shall be a sufficient Conviction to Bring the Officers or Person within the said penalty for the second Offence 6. And for the prevention of unjust Vexation by Reiterated Commitments for the same 2. Be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That no Person or Persons which shall be delivered or set at Large upon any Habeas Corpus shall at any time hereafter be again Imprisoned or Committed for the same Offence by any Person or Persons whatsoever other than by the Legal order and process of such Court wherein he or they shall be Bound by Recognizance to appear or other Court having Jurisdiction of the Cause 3. And if any other Person or Persons shall knowingly contrary to this Act Recommit or Imprison or knowingly procure or Cause to be Recommitted or Imprisoned for the same Offence or pretended Offence any Person or Persons delivered or set at Large as aforesaid or be knowingly aiding or Assisting therein then he or they shall forfeit to the Prisoner or Party Greived the sum of five hundred pounds any colourable pretence or variation in the Warrant or Warrants of Commitment notwithstandin to be Recovered as aforesaid 7. Provided alwayes and be it further Enacted That if any Person or Persons shall be Committed for High Treason or Felony Plainly and specially Expressed in the Warrant of Commitment upon his prayer or petition in open Court the first week of the Term or first day of the Sessions of Oyer and Terminer or General Gaol delivery to be Brought to his Tryal shall not be indicted sometime in the next Term Sessions of Oyer and Terminer or General Gaol delivery after such Commitment It shall and may be Lawful to and for the Judges of the Court of Kings Bench and Justices of Oyer and Terminer or General Gaol delivery and they are hereby Required upon motion to them made in open Court the last day of the Term Sessions or Gaol delivery either by the Prisoner or any one in his Behalf to set at Liberty the Prisoner upon Bail unless it appear to the Judges and Justices upon Oath made that the Witnesses for the King could not be produced the same Term Sessions or General Gaol delivery 2. And If any person or persons Committed as aforesaid upon his prayer or petition in open Court the first week of the Term or first day of the Sessions of Oyer and Terminer and General Gaol delivery to be Brought to his Tryal shall not be Indicted and Tryed the second Term Sessions of Oyer and Terminer or General Gaol delivery after his Commitment or upon his Tryal shall be Acquitted he shall be discharged from his Imprisonment 8. Provided alwaies That nothing in this Act shall Extend to discharge out of prison any person charged in debt or other Action or with process in any Civil Cause but that after he shall be discharged of his Imprisonment for such his Criminal Offence he shall be kept in Custody according to Law for such other suit 9. Provided alwaies and be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any person or persons sub●ects of this Realm shall be Committed to any prison or in Custody of any Officer or Officers whatsoever for any Criminal or Supposed Criminal matter That the said person shall not be Removed from the said prison and custody into the custody of any other Officer or Officers 2. unless it be by Habeas Corpus or some other Legal writ or where the prisoner is delivered to the Constable or other Inferiour Officer to carry such prisoner to some common Gaol 3. or where any person is sent by ●rder of any Judge of Assize or Justice of the peace ●o any Common workhouse or house of Correction 4. or where the prisoner is Removed from one prion or place to another within the same County in order to his or her Tryal or discharge in due Course of Law 5. or in case of sudden fire or Infection ●r other Necessity 6. And if any person or persons ●hall after such Commitment aforesaid make out and ●ign or Countersign any Warrant or Warrants for ●uch Removal aforesaid contrary to this Act as well ●e that makes or signs or Countersigns such Warrant or Warrants as the Officer or Officers that obey or Execute the same shall suffer and Incur the pains and Forfeitures in this Act before-mentioned both for the first and second Offence Respectively to be Recovered in manner aforesaid by the party Grieved 10. Provided also and be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That it shall and may be Lawful to and for any prisoner and prisoners as aforesaid to move and obtain his or their Habeas Corpus as well out of the High Court of Chancery or Court of Exchequer as out of the Courts of Kings Bench or common pleas or either of them 2. And if the said Lord Chancellour or Lord Keeper or any Judge or Judges Baron or Barons for the time being of the degree of the Coif of any of the Courts aforesaid in the Vacation time upon view of the Copy or Copies of the Warant or Warants of Commitment or Detainer or upon Oath made that such Copy or Copies were denied as aforesaid shall deny any writ of Habeas Corpus by this Act Required to be Granted being moved for as aforesaid they shall severally Forfeit to the prisoner or party Grieved the sum of five hundred pounds to be Recovered in manner aforesaid 11. And Be it Enacted and declared by the Authority aforesaid That an Habeas Corpus according to the true Intent and meaning of this Act may be directed and Run into any County Palatine the Cinqu●… ports or other priviledged places within the Kingdom of Engl. Dominion of Wales or Town of Berwick upon Tweed and the Isles of Jersey or Guernsey any Law or Usage to the Contrary notwithstanding 12. And for preventing Illegal Imprisonments in prisons beyond seas 2. Be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That no subject of this Realm that now is or hereafter shall be an Inhabitant or Resiant of this Kingdom of England Dominion of Wales or Town of Berwick upon Tweed shall or may be sent prisoner into Scotland Ireland Jersey Guernsey Tangier or into any parts Garrisons Islands or places beyond the seas which are or at any time hereafter shall be within or without the Dominions of His Majesty His heirs or successours 3. And that every such Imprisonment is hereby Enacted and adjudged to be Illegal 4. and that If any of the said subjects now is or hereafter shall be so Imprisoned every such person and persons so Imprisoned shall and may for every such Imprisonment maintain by vertue of this Act an Action or Actions of false Imprisonment in any of his Majesties Courts of Record against the person or persons by whom he or she shall be so Committed detained Imprisoned sent prisoner or Transported Contrary to the true meaning of this Act and against all or any
person or persons that shall frame Contrive Write Seal or Countersign any Warrant or Writing for such Commitment detainer Imprisonment or Transportation or shall be Advising Aiding or Assisting in the same or any of them 5. And the plaintiff in every such Action shall have Judgment to Recover his Treble Costs besides damages which damages so to be Given shall not be less than five hundred pounds 6. in which Action no delay stay or stop of proceeding by Rule order or Command nor no Injunction protection or priviledge whatsoever nor any more than one Imparlance shall be allowed Excepting such Rule of the Court wherein the Action shall depend made in open Court as shall be thought in Justice necessary for special cause to be Expressed in the said Rule 7. And the person or persons who shall Knowingly Frame Contrive write seal or Countersign any Warrant for such Commitment detainer or Transportation or shall so Commit detain Imprison or Transport any person or persons Contrary to this Act or be any waies Advising aiding or Assisting therein being Lawfully Convicted thereof shall be disabled from thenceforth to Bear any Office of Trust or Profit within the said Realm of England Dominion of Wales or Town of Berwick upon Tweed or any of the Islands Territories or Dominions thereunto Belonging 8. And shall Incur and sustain the pains Penalties and Forfeitures Limited ordained and provided in and by the statute of Provision and Premunire made in the sixteenth year of King Richard the Second 9. And be incapaple of any pardon from the King His Heirs or Successours of the said Forfeitures Losses or disabilities or any of them 13. Provided alwaies That nothing in this Act extend to give Benefit to any person who shall by Contract in Writing agree with any Merchant or Owner of any plantation or other person whatsoever to be transported to any parts beyond the Seas and receive Earnest upon such Agreement although that afterwards such person shall Renounce such Contract 14. Provided alwaies and be it Enacted That If any person or persons Lawfully Convicted of any Felony shall in open Court pray to be Transported beyond the seas and the Court shall think fit to leave him or them in prison for that purpose such person or persons may be Transported into any parts beyond the seas This Act or any thing therein Contained to the contrary notwithstanding 15. Provided also and be it Enacted That nothing herein Contained shall be deemed Construed or taken to Extend to the Imprisonment of any person before to first day of June one thousand six hundred seventy and nine or to any thing Advised procured or otherwise done Relating to such Imprisonment Any thing herein Contained to the Contrary notwithstanding 16. Provided also That If any person or persons at any time Resiant in this Realm shall have committed any Capital Offence in Scotl. or Ireland or any of the Islands or Foreign Plantations of the King His Heirs or Successours where he or she ought to be Tryed for such Offence such person or persons may be sent to such place there to Receive such Tryal in such manner as the same might have been used before the making of this Act any thing herein contained to the contrary notwithstanding 17. Provided alwayes and be it Enacted That no person or persons shall be sued Impleaded Molested or Troubled for any Offence against this Act unless the party offending be Sued or Impleaded for the same within two years at the most after such time wherein the Offence shall be Committed in Case the party Grieved shall not be then in Prison and if he shall be in Prison then within the space of two years after the decease of the Person Imprisoned or his or her delivery out of Prison which shall first happen 18. And to the intent no person may Avoyd his Tryal at the Assizes or General Gaol delivery by procuring his Removal before the Assizes at such time as he cannot be brought back to receive his Tryal there 2. Be it Enacted That after the Assizes proclaimed for thatCounty where the Prisoner is detained no person shall be Removed from the common Gaol upon any Habeas Corpus granted in pursuance of this Act but upon any such Habeas Corpus shall be brought before the Judge os Assize in open Court who is thereupon to do what to Justice shall appertain 19. Provided nevertheless That after the Assizes are Ended any person or persons detained may have his or her Habeas Corpus according to the direction and Intention of this Act. 20. And be it also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any Information Suit or Action shall be Brought or Exhibited against any person or persons for anyOffence committed or to be committed against the form of this Law it shall be Lawful for such defendants to plead the General Issue that they are not Guilty or that they own nothing and to give such special matter in Evidence to the Jury that shall Try the same which matter being pleaded had been good sufficent in Law to have discharged the said Defendant or Defendants against the said Information Suit or Action the said matter shall be then as available to him or them to all Intents and purposes as if he or they had sufficiently pleaded set forth or Alledged the same matter in Bar or Discharge of such information Suit or Action 21. And because many times persons charged with petty Treason or Felony or as Accessaries thereunto are Committed upon suspition only whereupon they are Bailable or not according as the Circumstances making out that suspition are more or less weighty which are best known to the Justices of Peace that committed the persons and have the Examinations before them or to other Justices of the Peace in the County 2. Be it therefore Enacted That where any person shall appear to be Committed by any Judge or Justice of the Peace and charged as Accessary before the Fact to any petty Treason or Felony or upon suspicion thereof or with suspicion of petty Treason or Felony which pettyTreason or Felony shall be plainly specially expressed in the Warrant of Commitment that such person shall not be Removed or Bailed by vertue of this Act or in any other manner than they might have been before the making of this Act. The Comment THere are three things which the Law of England which is a Law of Mercy principally Regards and taketh care of viz. Life Liberty and Estate Next to a man's Life the nearest thing that concerns him is freedom of his person For indeed what is Imprisonment but a kind of Civil Death Therefore saith Fortescue Cap. 42. Angliae Jura in omni Casu Libercati dant favorem The Laws of England do in All Cases favour Liberty Touching Commitments and what is Required to make a Legal Mittimus see before Pag. 27. The Writ of Habeas Corpus is a Remedy given by the common Law for such as were unjustly detained
in custody to procure their Liberty But before this statute was Rendred far less useful than it ought to be partly by the Judges pretending a power to Grant or deny the said Writ at their pleasure in many cases and Especially by the Ill practises of Sheriffs and Gaolers by putting the prisoner to the charge and trouble of an Alias and pluries that is a second and third Writ before they would obey the first for there was no penalty till the Third and then at last the Judges would oft-times Alleadge That they could not take Bail because the party was a prisoner of State c. Therefore to Remedy all those mischiefs This most wholsome Law was provided Which we shall briefly Endeavour to Divide into its several Branches and Explain it to the meanest Capacities since no Man is sure but one time or other he may have occasion to make use of it This Act concerneth either first persons committed for some other Criminal or supposedCriminal matter besides Treason or Felony and these are to have an Habeas Corpus Immediately 2ly such who in their Mittimus are charged with Treason or Felony these shall have the benefit of the said Writ after the time herein Limited 1st If any Gaoler or Under-Keeper shall not deliver a trueCopy of the Mittimus within 6 hours after the prisoner demands it the Head-Gaoler or Keeper forfeits to the prisoner for the first Offence 100l for the second Offence 200l and loses his place Nor is there any Fee to be paid for the same the Turn-key must deliver it at his peril And note if the prisoner should be lockt up or none suffered to come at him any friend of his may demand the same on his behalf 2. Whatever the Criminal matter be If Treason or Felony be not Expresly charged any person on the prisoners behalf carrying such true Copy of the Commitment to the Lord Chancellor or any one of the Judges or Barons of the Exchequer or upon Oath made that a Copy was demanded and denied he shall Grant an Habeas Corpus or forfeit 500l to the prisoner But note the Request must be made to such Judge in Writing and Attested by two witnesses 3. If the Sheriff or Gaoler do not carry up the prisoner and Return the true causes of his detainour within three days If under twenty miles distance or within ten daies if above twenty and under an hundred miles or within twenty daies if above an hundred miles he forfeits 500l to the prisoner Note the prisoner must pay the Charges of his carrying up and the Judge when he Grants the Writ may order how much but it must not be above 12 d. a mile If upon the Return of such Habeas Corpus it appear the prisoner is not charged with Treason or Felony specially and plainly Expressed or for such matters as by Law are not Bailable the Judge shall discharge the prisoner upon Bail 4. If a person once so Bailed out shall again be Imprisoned for the same Offence those that do it forfeit 500 l. 5. If there be High Treason or Felony plainly and specially Expressed That is not only Generally for Treason or Felony but Treason in conspiring to kill the King or in Counterfeiting the King's Coin or Felony for stealing the goods of such an one to such a value c. Then the Prisoner cannot have his Habeas Corpus till first he has on the first week of the Term or first day of Sessions of Oyer and Terminer or General Gaol-delivery petitioned in open Court to be brought to his Tryal and then if he be not brought to Tryal the next Term or Sessions following on the last day thereof he shall be Bailed and if not Indicted the second Term or Sessions shall be discharged 6. This Act extends to all places within England and Wales the Tower cannot be supposed to be exempted nor Windsor Castle nor any such Royal Forts for the words are general And besides there is a special Act of Parliament that unites the King's Castles to the Counties wherein they stand there having been it seems some pretensions and ill practices to hold them district that therein they might detain men prisoners against Law and not admit any Writ to enlarge them For Remedy whereof it was thus Enacted Anno 13. Rich. Secundi Item It is Ordained and Assented That the King's Castles and Gaols which were wont to be Joyned to the Bodies of the Counties and be now Severed shall be Rejoyned to the same Counties Lastly No person shall be sent Prisoner out of England or Wales into Scotland Ireland Jersey Guernsey Tangier or any other place beyond the Seas The Proviso's and other Clauses of this Act may be easily apprehended by the meanest capacities AND As the Law provides thus for our Liberty so it takes care that those that are in Custody shall not be abused or oppressed to which purpose I shall here insert so much as is material necessary to be known by all persons who are so unhappy as to be prisoners out of the Statute of the 22d and 23d Car. 2. Cap. 20. The words wereof are as follows WHEREAS Persons that are under Arrests or committed to the custody of Sheriffs Bailiffs Gaolers Keepers of Prisons or Gaols are much abused and wronged by Extorting of great Fees Rewards and other Exactions and put to great Expences under pretences of favour or otherwise whereby they are greatly Oppressed and many times Ruined in their Estates 2. For Remedy thereof Be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any Under-Sheriff Bailiff Serjeant at Mace or other Officer or minister whatsoever shall at any time or times hereafter have in his or their Custody any person or persons by vertue or colour of any Writ Process or other Warrant whatsoever it shall not be lawful for such Officer or Officers to convey or carry or cause to be conveyed or carried the said person or persons to any Tavern Ale-House or other publick Victualling or Drinking-house without the free and voluntary consent of the said person or persons so as to charge such Prisoner with any sum of Money for any Wine Beer Ale Victuals Tobacco or any other things whatsoever but what the said person or persons shall call for of his her or their own accord 3 And shall not demand take or receive or cause to be demanded taken or received directly or indirectly any other or greater Sum or Sums than what by Law ought to be taken or demanded for such Arrest taking or waiting until such person or persons shall have procured an Appearance found Bail agreed with his or their Adversaries or be sent to the proper Gaol belonging to the County City Town or Place where such Arrest or taking shall be 4. Nor take and Exact any other Reward or Gratuity for so keeping the said person or persons out of the Gaol or Prison than what he she or they shall or will of his her or their own
accord voluntarily and freely give 5 Nor take nor receive any other or greater Sum or Sums for each nights Lodging or other Expences than what is reasonable and fitting in such cases or shall be so adjudged by the next Justice of the Peace or at the next Quarter-Sessions 6. And shall not cause or procure the said person or persons to pay for any other Wine Beer Ale Victuals Tobacco or other things than what the said person or persons shall voluntarily freely and particularly call for And that every Under-Sheriff Gaoler Keeper of Prison or Gaol and every person or persons whatsoever to whose Custody any person or persons shall be delivered or commited by virtue of any Writ of Process or any pretence whatsoever shall permit and suffer the said person or persons at his and their will and pleasure to send for and have any Beer Ale Victuals and other necessary Food where and from whence they please and also to have and use such Bedding Linnen and other things as the said person or persons shall think fit without any purloyning detaining or paying for the same or any part thereof nor shall demand take or receive of the said person or persons any other or greater Fee or Fees whatsoever for his her or their Commitment Release or Discharge or for his her or their Chamber-Rent than what is allowable by Law untill the same shall be settled by three Justices of the Peace whereof one to be of the Quorum of each particular County City and Town Corporate in their several Precincts and for the City of London and Counties of Middlesex and Surrey the two Lord Chief Justices of the Kings's-Bench and Common-Pleas and the Lord Chief Baron or any two of them and the Justices of the Peace of the same in their several Jurisdictions And likewise that the said Lord Chief Justice Lord Chief Baron and Justices of the Peace in their several Jurisdictions and all Commissioners for Charitable Uses do their best Endeavours and Diligence to Examine and finde out the several Legacies Gifts and Bequests bestowed and given for the Benefit and Advantage of the Poor Prisoners for Debt in the several Gaols and Prisons in this Kingdom and to send for any Deeds Wills Writings and Books of Accompts whatsoever and any person or persons concerned therein and to Examine them upon Oath to make true discovery thereof which they have full Power and Authority hereby to do and the same so found out and ascertained to order and settle in some manner and way that the Prisoners hereafter may not be defrauded but Receive the full benefit thereof according to the true intent of the Donors And that these Accounts of the several Legacies Gifts and Bequests given and bestowed upon the several Prisoners for Debt within this Kingdom and the several Rates of Fees and the future Government of Prisons be signed and confirmed by the Lord Chief Justices and Lord Chief Baron or any two of them for the time being and the Justices of the Peace in London Middlesex and Surrey and by the Judges for the several Circuits and Justices of the Peace for the time being in their several Precincts and fairly written and hung up in a Table in every Gaol and Prison before the first day of November 1671. and likewise be Registred by each and every Clerk of the Peace within his or their particular Jurisdiction And after such Establishment no other or greater Fee or Fees than shall be so Established shall be Demanded or Received And whereas it is become the common practice of Gaolers and Keepers of Newgate the Gate-house at Westminster and sundry other Gaols and Prisons to Lodge together in one Room or Chamber and Bed Prisoners for Debt and Felons whereby many times honest Gentlemen Trades-men and others Prisoners for Debt are disturbed and hindered in the night-time from their natural Rest by reason of their Fetters and Irons and otherwise much offended and troubled by their lewd and prophane Language and Discourses with most horrid Cursing and Swearing much accustomed to such persons 2. Be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid that it shall not be lawful hereafter for any Sheriff Gaoler or Keeper of any Gaol or Prison to put keep or Lodge Prisoners for Debt and Felons together in one Room or Chamber but that they shall be put kept and Lodged separate and apart one from another in distinct Rooms 3. Upon pain that he she or they which shall offend against this Act or the true Intent and meaning thereof or any part thereof shall forfeit and lose his or her Office Place or Imployment and shall forfeit treble damages to the party grieved to be Recovered by vertue of this Act any Law Statute Usage or Custom to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding And to the End that English-men may more entirely enjoy their due Freedoms the prudence of our Legislators have thought fit from time to time to Remove Encroachments thereupon though under pretence of Jurisdictions and Courts of Justice and to prohibit any Exorbitant Arbitrary Power for the future but that all things may be left to the calm and equal proceedings of Law and that most excellent Method of Trial by Juries one of the principal Bulwarks of England's Liberties For an Instance hereof take the Act following An Act for Regulating of the Privy Council and for taking away the Court commonly called the Star-Chamber VVHereas by the Great Charter many times confirmed in Parliament it is Enacted That no Freeman shall be taken or Imprisoned or Disseized of his Freehold or Liberties or Free Customs or be Outlawed or Exiled or otherwise destroyed and that the King will not pass upon him or condemn him but by lawful Judgment of his Peers or by the Law of the Land 2. And by another Statute made in the fifth year of the Reign of King Edward it is Enacted That no man shall be Attached by any Accusation nor fore-judged of Life or Limb nor his Lands Tenements Goods nor Chattels seized into the King's Hands against the Form of the Great Charter and the Law of the Land 3. And by another Statute made in the five and twentieth year of the Reign of the same King Edward the third it is Accorded Assented and Established That none shall be taken by Petition or Suggestion made to the King or to his Council unless it be by Indictment or Presentment of good and lawful people of the same Neighbourhood where such Deeds be done in due manner or by Process made by Writ Original at the Common Law and that none be put out of his Franchise or Freehold unless he be duly brought in to Answer and fore-judged of the same by the course of the Law And if any thing be done against the same it shall be Redressad and holden for none 4. And by another Statute made in the eight and twentieth year of the Reign of the same King Edward the Third it is amongst other things Enacted That
is garnisht with Golden Stars was not originally Erected but confirmed and establisht by the Stat. of the 3 H. 7. Ca. 1. For there had before been some such Jurisdiction as Cook observes 4. Instit fo 62. yet there is reason to believe That it grew up rather by Connivance and Usurpation than any due course of Law The Crimes it pretended to punish were the Exorbitant Offences of Great Men whom Inferiour Judges and Jurors though they should not would in respect of their Greatness be afraid to offend Bribery Extortion Maintenance Champerty Imbracery Forgery Perjury Libelling Challenges Duels c. Their proceedings were by English Bill and Process under the Great Seal and the punishments by them Inflicted were Fines Imprisonment Pillory Cutting off Ears c. But whatever pretences there were for the setting up this Court at first 't is certain it was made use of as a property of Arbitrary Power to Crush any whom the Ruling Ministers and Favourites had a mind to destroy and indeed there were Three things in the very nature of this Court which were destructive to the Original Constitution of our English Government and Liberties 1. They proceeded without Juries 2. They pretended to a Power to Examine men upon their Oaths touching Crimes by them supposed to be committed which is contrary to all Law and Reason For Nemo tenetur seipsum Accusare No man is bound to accuse himself 3. The Judges of this Court proceeded by no known Law or Rules but were left at Liberty to Act Arbitrarily and according to their own pleasures whereas the Law of Engl. hates to leave to any such an unlimited Power but as it marks out the several species of Crimes such or such an Act shall be Treason this Felony that petty Larceny c. So it awards certain and positive punishments proportionate to each of them Therefore this Court being found a Grievance to the Subject was by this Act dissolved and taken away And to the intent nothing of the like kind should by any other name be practised for the future it is Declared and Enacted That the King and His Privy Council shall not question or dispose of the Lands or Goods of any Subjects And if they do each Privy Counsellor or present forfeits 500l to the party grieved A Clause in the Act of 31. Car. 2. C. 1. Whereas by the Laws and Customs of this Realm the Inhabitants thereof cannot be compelled against their wills to receive Souldiers into their Houses and to sojourn them there Be it Declared and Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That no Officer Military or Civil nor any other person whatever shall from henceforth presume to Place Quarter or Billet any Souldier or Souldiers upon any Subject or Inhabitant of this Realm of any degree quality or profession whatever without his consent And that it shall and may be lawful for every such Subject and Inhabitant to refuse to Sojourn or Quarter any Souldier or Souldiers notwithstanding any Command Order Warrant or Billeting whatever HAVING thus recited several of the most material Statutes provided by the care and wisdom of our Ancestors and prudent Legislators for the Guarding and Securing our English Liberties I shall now for the Reader 's Information proceed to add certain other Laws of another nature And first give the Reader all the Statutes at this day in force against Protestant Dissenters upon the account of Religion And secondly an Abstract of all the Laws against Papists And in order to the first of these we begin with a Statute touching the Writ De Excommunicato Capiendo upon which many people have been prosecuted Which Act is as followeth Anno Quinto Reginae Elizabethae Ca. 23. An Act for the due Execution of the Writ De Excommunicato capiendo FOrasmuch as divers persons offending in many great Crimes and Offences appertaining meerly to the Jurisdiction and Determination of the Ecclesiastical Courts and Judges of this Realm are many times unpunished for lack and want of the good and due Execution of the Writ de Excommunicato Capiendo directed to the Sheriff of any County for the taking and apprehending of any such Offenders 2. The great abuse whereof as it should seem hath grown for that the said Writ is not Returnable in any Court that might have the Judgment of the well Executing and serving of the said Writ according to the Contents thereof 3. But hitherto have been left only to the discretion of the Sheriffs and their Deputies by whose Negligences and Defaults for the most part the said Writ is not Executed upon the Offenders as it ought to be 4. By reason whereof such Offenders be greatly encouraged to continue their sinful and criminous Life much to the displeasure of Almighty God and to the great contempt of the Ecclesiastical Laws of this Realm 2. Wherefore for the redress thereof be it enacted by the Queens Most Excellent Majesty with the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same That from and after the first day of May next coming every Writ of Excommunicato Capiendo that shall be granted and Awarded out of the high Court of Chancery against any person or persons within the Realm of England shall be made in the time of the Term 2. And Returnable before the Queen's Highness Her Heirs and Successors in the Court commonly called the King's Bench in the Term next after the Teste of the same Writ 3. and the same writ shall be made to contain at the least twenty days between the Teste and the Return thereof 4. And after the same writ shall be so made and sealed that then the said Writ shall be forthwith brought into the said Court of King's Bench and there in the presence of the Justices shall be opened and delivered of Record to the Sheriffs or other officer to whom the serving and Execution thereof shall appertain or to his or their Deputy or Deputies 5. And if afterward it shall or may appear to the Justices of the same Court for the time being that the same writ so delivered of Record be not duty returned before them at the day of the return thereof or that any other Default or Negligence hath been used or bad in the not well serving and Executing of the said Writ that then the Justices of the said Court shall and may by Authority of this Act Assess such Amerciament upon the said Sheriff or other Officer in whom such Default shall appear as to the discretion of the said Justices shall be thought meet and convenient which Amerciament so Assessed shall be Estreated into the Court of Exchequer as other Amerciaments have been used 3. And he it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That the Sheriff or other Officer to whom such writ of Excommunicato Capiendo or other Process by virtue of this Act shall be directed shall not in any wise be compelled to bring the
the Romans Interdico tibi aqua igni than one of the solemn Institutions of God And therefore waving any discourse of what Spiritual Influence or Effect may be dreaded from the same in our dayes which we hope are wise enough not to be Bug-Bear'd with that Maxim of the Canonists Excommunicatio sive Justa sive Injusta est timenda A Church-Curse be it Just or Unjust is to be feared All that we shall speak to is matter of Law for so it is that there are Legal Bars and punishments formed by our Temporal Laws as long as the Legislative Power shall not be at leisure to consider of them and if they find it requisite Repeal them For 1. A person Excommunicated is forthwith disabled to Sue in any of His Majesties Courts not that thereby he loses his Right for ever but the Excommunication may be pleaded in Abatement of his present Action till the same is taken off by an Absolution Yet note That whosoever is Instrumental in procuring solliciting decreeing or pronouncing the Excommunication shall never be allowed to plead it nor shall it be pleaded unless the Excommunication be signified by the Bishop himself for the Court will receive no Certificate from any to whom they cannot write to Absolve the person if they find cause 2. Likewise though a person Excommunicated may be appointed an Executor and is capable of having a Legacy given him yet so-long as he stands Excommunicated he is not to be allowed to prove the Will nor Sue for his Legacy in the Spiritual Court But note whereas some say a man Excommunicated cannot Marry 't is Non-sense for Marriage is de Jure Naturali and alike absurd it is for any to pretend that such a person cannot give his Suffrage in any Election as for Example of Parliament-men for the same is an idle dream the Law allows him a Voice so long as he hath a Free-hold of Forty Shillings per Annum though he were under forty Curses 3. If a person justly or unjustly Excommunicated continue so by the space of forty dayes then by the Common Law the Bishop certifying the same into Chancery which is called a Significavit there shall issue forth a Writ from thence to the Sheriff of the County where the party lives to Imprison him without Bail or Mainprize till he hath made satisfaction to Holy Church This is called a Writ de Excommunicato Capiendo and such Imprisonment of a person Excommunicated by a Civil Sanction is not practised in any Nation in the world but ours and if it had here too been Buried with its Brother de Haeretico Comburendo I believe it would have had few Tears at its Funeral But at Common Law the same Writ being not Returnable in any Court the Sheriffs took their own time and used their discretion in Executing it to inforce which this Statute was made whereby it is Enacted 1. That the said Writ shall be Returnable in the King's Bench yet the Sheriff need not bring thither the Body 2. If the Sheriff Return Non est Inventus a Capias shall be Awarded with Proclamation to come in with six dayes if the party do not he forfeirs 10 l. and thenceforwards Capias after Capias and 20 l. forfeited on each 3. But note there are two Cases in which though a man stands out never so many Proclamations he shall forfeit nothing And they two are these 1. VVhere the Party against whom the VVrit De Excommunicato Capiendo is Awarded hath not therein a sufficient and lawful Addition That is saith Cowel a Title over and above his Christian and Sirname shewing his State Degree Trade Occupation or Mystery as Lord Knight Gentleman Yeoman Clothier and the like and the Hamlet Town Parish and County where he is or lately was conversant and dwelling And if it be with a Nuper late of such a place then you see there must be made out one Capias without any penalty 2. VVhere it is not expressed in the Bishops Certificate that the Cause for which the party was originally Cited into the Spiritual Court was for one of these 10 Causes following viz. 1. Heresie 2. Refusing to have Children Baptized 3. Refusing to Receive the Communion 4. Refusing to come to Divine Service 5. Errour in Religion or Doctrine 6. Incontinency 7. usury 8. Simony 9. Perjury in the Ecclesiastical Court or 10. Idolatry To know whether there be such cause expressed you may have a Copy of the Significavit at the Cursitors Office in Chancery-Lane Then in either of these cases all pains and forfeitures limited by this Statute by reason of such VVrit of Excom Cap. wanting such an Addition or Significavit wanting all the causes aforesaid shall be utterly void in Law and by way of plea to be allowed to the party grieved Touching the Authority of the Courts called Spiritual or Ecclesiastick whether they have truly any at all by our present Laws I shall not here debate they that have a mind to hear what is to be said on that Theme may read Mr. Hickeringil's Book of Naked Truth or Mr. Care 's Book written in the year 1664. entituled A true Guide for all persons concerned in Ecclesiastical Courts neither of which I ever yet saw sufficiently Answered yet still since most certain it is that such Courts do proceed and Act we shall suppose them to have some Power and only inform our Reader of the course of their practice as it is used at this day and his best course to defend himself You must note that persons are usually Excommunicated upon Contempt or Contumacy which may be 1. If the party being duly Cited Denieth or Omitteth to appear For if he be not personally summoned he needs not appear the first time but then their way is to Cite him by a Writ called Viis Modis set up at the Doors of his House or at the Church Doors Citing him at a certain day to appear to answer c. But being personally Cited if he doth not appear the first time or whether he be or no if he doth not appear the second time he is Excommunicated for Contempt If he be Cited generally the Law is That he shall appear the third day after the Service of the Citation The Law also is that if he he will give the Apparator 6d he must bring him the full and true Copy of the Citation If a day of appearance be mentioned and the same be not at least the third day from the Citation or if he hath before witnesses given the Apparator 6d to bring him a full and true Copy of the Citation and he doth not I conceive he needs not appear but listen what they do and if they decree him Excommunicated he may Appeal within 15 daies and bring from the Superiour Court an Inhibition to stop their proceedings against him And further the Rule in that Law is Totus dies debetur Delinquenti It is enough for a person to appear any hour of
the day provided it be a Court-hour wherein he is Cited to appear so as though he be called before he comes vet if he appeareth that day he shall be discharged or he may Appeal 2. When he appeareth he shall demand his Charge which is either by a Presentment from Church-Wardens or by a Libel or Articles which are exhibited by a Promoter Be it which it will he shall demand a Copy if it be denyed or delayed he may bring if he will a Prohibition from the King's Court at Westminster forbidding them to proceed in that Cause till they have given a full and true Copy of his Charge according to the Statute of 2 Hen. 5. Ca. 3. If he appeareth in person he ought to have his Charge the first Court-day if he appeareth by a Proctor they will usually to get the Proctor more Fees give to the second Court-day to bring in the Libel or Articles 4. If they deliver him not his Charge the second Court-day he may Appeal if upon his demand the Judge will not dismiss him or he may if he will bring his Prohibition for want of Articles and stop their further proceedings 5. If the proceedings be upon a Promotion and the Promoter hath Imployed a Proctor in the Case the party accused must know that no Proctor can be admitted without a Proxy that is Letters Procuratory under the Promoter's Hand and Seal authorizing him to act for him in the Case and when he hath that there must be an Act entred in Court to admit such a person Proctor in the Case The party charged may go or send to the Register and demand a sight of both those the Reason in Law is this because any Proctor is liable to the Parties Action if he molesteth any person in the name of another without Authority from him And secondly If there be no Act of Court admitting him as a Proctor though the party accused be Conqueror in the case yet he cannot Recover Costs because there is no Legal Adversary against whom they can be Recovered 6. According to the statute-Statute-Law Every Informer if overthrown shall pay charges According to the Civil and Canon Law none ought to be admitted as a Voluntary Promoter till he hath given security to pay the Charges If overthrown The Party Accused therefore shall before he answereth the Articles demand this if it be denied by the Judge he may Appeal to the Superiour Court It is also worth the persons Enquiry who is Accused to be well advised whether the Promoter in the Ecclesiastical Courts be not obliged to all those things that an Informer in the Secular Courts is tied to by the Statutes 31 Eliz. 5. 18. Eliz. 5. 21. Jac. 4. The Reason is because those Statutes say Informers Upon any Penal Statutes and commonly Promoters in the Ecclesiastical Courts say such and such things are done contrary to the Statutes of this Realm as well as contrary to the Canons now what things the Statutes which also name Promoters Require of such Informers and Promoters the Statutes do declare 7. VVhen the Party Accused hath a Copy of his Libel let him demand time to answer If the Judge denies him time at least till the next Court-day let him Appeal Having due time granted in the mean time let him duly consider the matter and form of his Libel As to which let him amongst other things observe these that follow 1. VVhether the matters he be Charged with belong to the Cognisance of the Ecclesiastical Court If Lawyers tell him no let that be his Answer and let him hasten to bring his Prohibition which Lies in all such Causes 2. VVhether they have put into the Libel the Promotors Petition for Right and Justice to be done him it is oft times left out It is a Rule in their Law Libellus est ipso Jure nullus ubi nihil Petitur If he finds that this is wanting let his Answer only be That the Libel is in Law utterly void and Insufficient and desire to be dismissed If the Judge refuseth to dismiss him let him Appeal 3. Let him also Observe whether he be in the Articles laid to be one of the Diocess or a Parishoner of such a Parish for it be not laid it can never be proved and so the Promotor must fail in his Suit for what is not laid cannot be proved Quicquid deponitur Extra Articulum deponitur Extra Legem is a Rule in their Law If he be said to be a Parishioner of such a place within such a diocess let him not in his Answer Confess it but say He cannot determine the Bounds of Diocesses and parishes but for that he Referreth himself to the Law 4. Let him also observe if the things he be Charged to have done or omitted be within the compass of a year and whether there hath been since no Act of Grace or Oblivion which hath pardoned them and whether they be not such things as he hath been punished for or such things as the Statute-Law hath Limited the prosecution of to a less time than a year For if any of these things be they may be given in answer to avoid eithor the whole or any part of the Charge If the Judge will not accept the Answer the party may Sue out a Prohibition and stop them 5. Let him also observe whether he be charged certainly or particularly as to time and place or only generally and incertainly if he be charged only generally as for the most part he is in Church-VVardens Presentments not mentioning time and place or incertainly with Or 's that he did not come to his Parish-Church such and such months and daies or was absent in some one or more or most of them Let his Answer be that this Charge is void in Law for the generality or incertainty of it If the Judge will not Receive his Answer let him Appeal for the Law of England alloweth no such Charges from which can be no Discharge or where the Crime is not fixed to a certain time But it may be in this Case a Prohibition will be his best Remedy 6. Let him observe whether he be charged only upon Statute-Law or upon Canons if upon Canons let him in his Answer modestly refer himself to Persons Learned in the Statute-Laws whether any such Canons were ever Enacted Ratifyed Allowed or Confirmed by Parliament or by the Established Laws of the Land as they stood in the year 1639. and if not whether they be not made void by the Statute 13. Car. 2. 10. When he hath given his Answer which must be subscribed by his own hand it is usual for the Adverse Proctor to demand a time to prove his Articles for which the Judge at his pleasure granteth two three four or six Court-daies usually but two let him also at the same time move that he may have liberty within that time also to produce any Witnesses for his Defence if it be denied let him Appeal 11. Let him observe what time
the Judge setteth his Adversary to produce his Witnesses in Court and whom he names for Witnesses for him Let him also desire a time to be set in Court for him to produce his Witnesses and be careful to bring them at the time for they must all be sworn in the Court then Examined privately by the Register Unless the Adversary desireth a Commission to Examine Witnesses which is not often done because it is much more Chargeable is that Case there are no Witnesses in the Court produced and Sworn but before those Commissioners 12. if the party Defendant will he may deliver in to the Register Interrogatories upon which the Register shall Cross-Examine his Adversaries VVitnesses But he must be very wary as to this for he shall not afterward Except against any of his Adversaries Witnesses whom he hath Cross-Examined and made VVitnesses for himself 13. Let him Advise his own Witnesses to be very careful that the Register setteth down what they say in their own words that under the pretence of putting them into a decent phrase their whole sense be not altered 14. VVhen the time Probatory set at first by the Judge is expired let him desire of the Judge Publication If the Judge will grant longer time to prove let him desire the Advantage of the same time also to bring more VVitnesses for himself which he may or may not make use of as he pleases If once the Term given for proof be Expired let him desire Publication Liberty to take out a Copy of the depositions 15. VVhen he hath got a Copy let him diligently observe if he can prove any thing contrary to what the VVitnesses or any of them have sworn if he can let him at the next Court-day offer a paper of general Particular Exceptions shewing the Particulars which he Excepteth against in their depositions severally as well as his general Exceptions against them all Let him desire a time to bring in witness to prove his Exceptions If the Judge refuseth to admit his Exception or to give him due time to prove them he may again Appeal 16. VVhen once the Promoter hath Allowed to have Publication he may again move for time to Invalidate the proof of the Exceptions but not to fortifie his first proof If any Liberty of that Nature be desired the defendant may Appeal for unless in a case for the King after Publication no new VVitnesses can be produced 17. VVhen the party against whom the Promotion is peruseth the deposition let him strictly observe whether the particulars he is charged with be proved by two Witnesses for it is a Rule in their Law Vox unius est Vox Nullius and if the Iudge will admit the thing proved by one Witness a Prohibition Lyes for the Kings Judges will not only see that those Courts shall keep to matters truly belonging to their Jurisdiction but also that in the prosecution of them they shall keep to the Received Rules of their own Law in those main points of proof c. 18. It is an usual thing upon presentments by Church-VVardens when the party presented calls for proof of the presentment to tell them That the Church Wardens presentment is a Conviction they being sworn Officers But this is contrary to the Law of England which alloweth no presentment by Officers ex Officio to be a Conviction If Grand Juries at Assizes and Sessions do present this is no Conviction but the persons must after this be Indicted and proof made by VVitnesses If therefore the Ecclesiastical Court Insists on this the person may appeal or which it may be is better he may have a prohibition from the Kings Court at Westminster as some greater Lawyers think 19. VVhen the time for proof is Expired and Publication made and Exceptions given in and proved and Publication of those proofs also made either party may move for a time to be set to Conclude and to give the Judge Information of the whole state and merit of the Case and also to give Sentence in it 20. At the day set the Party Accused or Promoted against may Appear and shew to the Judge the whole state of the Case and plead it himself or if he will by an Advocate if any be at hand or for ought I know if there be none by Attorney or Counselor at Common-Law after which the Judge will appoint upon desire a day to give sentence 22. At that day the Party must have a form of an Absolutory Sentence ready to tender to the Judge if the Judge give Sentence against him he may appeal within 15 days by virtue of the statute 24. Hen. 8. 12. 22 All along the Prosecution the person against whom the Prosecution is shall do well after every Court to get the Acts of the Courts in his Case under the Registers hand and to keep them by him carefully So much I thought fit to add here for the Readers Instruction how to behave and Conduct himself when Troubled in those Courts because 't is a practice very little understood by means whereof greedy Proctors Solicitors and other ill men frequently make a prey of honest people therein concerned I shall now Recount the ways and means how to get off from the VVrit De Excommunicato Capiendo VVe told you before no Bail would be accepted nor will an Habeas Corpus avail you unless you have a mind only to change the Prison nor does a Prohibition or Homine Replegiando Lie But the several ways to help according as the Case happens are as followeth 1. If the Party Imprisoned hath brought a PROHIBITION by which the Ecclesiastical Court hath been commanded to proceed no further and to absolve the Person if Excommunicated and the Judge hath disobeyed the Writ and signified and procured the Party to be imprisoned the person that is imprisoned at any time in Term upon a Motion shall have first an Attachment against the Judge and then a Writ of Supersedeas to the Sheriff to deliver the Prisoner to follow the Attachment without any Submission to the Bishop at all or any Caution Such Writ may be found in the Register of Original writs pag. 66. Nay if the Attachment be granted and the Person be Imprisoned or a Writ out commanding him to be taken and the Term be done before the Attachment can be served the Register tell us that he shall have the same VVrit during the Vacation out of Chancery Nay it is the Opinion of men skilled in the Law that he shall have such a Supersedeas upon Affidavit made that the proceedings are contrary to a Prohibition served upon the Judge though no such Attachment be taken out 2. If the Party imprisoned or against whom the Writ is to take him though he be not taken hath appealed according to the Statute 24 Hen. 8. 12. If he bringeth into the Court of Chancery an Authentick copy of his Appeal he shall have a Writ of Supersedeas to stop the Sheriff from apprehending
him or to deliver him if he be apprehended only this must be within a Year after his Appeal that it may appear to the Court he hath not deserted his Appeal you may find forms of such a Supersedeas also in the Register of Original Writs both these are founded upon excellent Reason The Law of England will not suffer Ecclesiastical Judges either to invade their Right or to exalt themselves against their Authority nor yet suffer Inferiour Ecclesiastical Courts to invade the Right Power and Authority of Superiour Courts in their own Order 3 If a Person be sued in the Ecclesiastical Courts for a matter not within their Jurisdiction and they have caught him upon contempt in not appearing or not obeying their Sentence Upon a suggestion to the Kings Courts if it appear to them that the Original matter was not cognoscible in the Ecclesiastical Courts they will supersed the Proceedings and order the imprisoned Person to be discharged 4. If the imprisoned Person or he against whom the Writ is out though he be not taken bring a Copy of the Bishops Significavit into the Courts at Westminster and make it appear to the Judges there that the cause of Excommunication is not therein expressed together with the day when it was pronounced if he be not said to be excommunicated Majori Excommunicatione if it be not signed by the Bishop or said to be done Authoritate nostra ordinaria if the Party Excommunioated be not expressed by name the Court will deliver the person Dr. Cozens mentions three of these cases and the Reader also may find them in the Register of Writs The first he saith he cannot find in the Register viz. That the Articles or matter of the Libel must be expressed nor indeed do I find it there but it is in several Reports The reasons are 1. Because the Law will not suffer men to be imprisoned for every light offence this Dr. Cozens gives 2. Because the Kings Courts can recieve Significavits from none but the person to whom if need be they may write to discharge the Prisoner Nor will the Court suffer a person to be Excommunicated and lye in Prison for a Crime which the Ecclesiastical Court hath no judgment in nor yet unless it appeareth to the Court he hath stood Forty dayes excommunicated Again heretofore whole Cities and Communities have been excommunicated therefore the person must be expressed by name or he shall not lie there 5. Let him procure the Copy of the Writ de Excommunicato Capiendo and observe first if it be issued in Term-time 2. If there were full twenty days betwixt the Test and Return 3. If it be made Returnable the next Term. 4. If there be due Additions in it 5. If before it was delivered to the Sheriff it were Entered upon Record in the Kings-Bench and made Returnable into that Court. All these things are Required by the statute 5 Eiz 23 If any of these Errours be found he shall upon motion in the Kings Bench be discharged and the Writ will be declared Illegal Lastly If he can be delivered by none of these ways he may at any Sealing in the Chancery whether it be in Term or out of Term upon a petition to or motion before the L. Chancellor have the VVrit de Cautione Admittenda granted him in case he hath before offered the Bishop a Bond of 10. l or 20 l. with Sureties stare parere mandatis Ecclesiae in forma Juris when he hath it let him by some Attorney or Attorneys Clerk send it and tender a Bond and Sufficient Sureties with it to the Bishop and demand the Discharge of the Prisoner If it be not presently done let him certifie so much and at the next Seal move for a second Writ to the Bishop or which it may be is more adviseable let him move for a second Writ to the Sheriff the form of it is in the Register In that the King commandeth the Sheriff to admonish the Bishop to accept the Caution to deliver the Prisoner and further commands him that in case he doth it not in his presence the Sheriff should do it himself If the Sheriff yields not Obedience upon another Motion he ought to have a Writ to the Coroners commanding to take security of the Sheriff to appear at Westminster such a day to shew reason why he hath contemned the Kings Writ and further it commandeth the Coroners to take the Caution of the Prisoner and to deliver him The Reader may find all this in the Register where are the Forms of all these Writs and also in Dr. Cozens Apology p. 1. C. 2. who being himself a Judge in the Ecclesiastical Courts cannot be presumed to have told us any thing but what is Law contrary to their own Interest It is true the Bishop upon taking such Cautionary Bonds doth ordinarily Insist upon the persons paying the Prosecutors charges but it is unreasonable 1. Because he hath nothing to do but to Execute the Command of the Writ which speaks not a word of charges 2. Because if the charges be legally due the Promoter must have also a legal way to Recover them if not it is Extortion for the Ecclesiastical Judge to Exact them 3. Because it is no sufficient Return to the King 's Writ which mentioneth no such thing to say He could not discharge the Prisoner because he would not pay the Promoter's Charge But because the Legal Charges are small usually the Prisoner for his Liberty will pay the charges which are as follow   l. s. d. For the Adversary's Proctor every Court-day until he was Excommunicated and that day when the Significavit was decreed For every day 00 01 00 For the Proctor's Procuratory Letter Seal and VVax 00 01 08 For certifying the Service of the Citation 00 00 06 For the Articles if there were any 00 05 00 For an Act of Court for every day 00 00 02 For the Significavit 00 05 00 For the Significavit to deliver the Prisoner 00 05 00 For the Excommunication and the Schedule 00 02 04 For the VVrit de Excommunicato Capiendo and the charge of Entring it upon record in the King's-Bench about 01 01 00   02 01 08 If the business have proceeded no further than a Libel and Articles this is all the Legal Charges but if it hath proceeded further there may be for the Copy of the Answer 00 00 09 For every Witness Examined 1 s. and for the first 00 01 06 For a Fee to the Proctor at Inform. 00 03 00 For a Definitive Sentence 00 11 00 For the Advocate at the Sentence 00 10 00 But note the Charges are more or less as the Cause went further or lesser way before the Excommunication But if the Bishop will not take the Caution and discharge you you may have a second Writ directed to the High-Sheriff commanding him to go to the Bishop and require him to take the Caution and to deliver the Prisoner and
thereby appears some of them did come to Church and heard divine Service to save the Penalties in the former Acts and yet continued Papists still in their hearts Therefore by this Act they were all to take the Sacrament once a year And if they refused they should forfeit 20 l. the 1st year for the 2d year 40 l. for every year afterwards 60l untill he or she have received the said Sacrament And by the 4th Section the Church Wardens and Constables are to present the monthly absence of all POPISH Recusants but they are not bound by this Act to present any but Papists For from this Act we may observe that none can be Prosecuted upon this Act or any of the other which it refers to which are all those here before rehearsed unless they be POPISH Recusants for so are the express words of the Act. And without doubt should any busy Officer whatsoever Present ot prosecute any person thereupon other than a Popish Recusant the person so presented may Joyn Issue that he is no such person as these Acts intend being not a Papist So that upon the whole matter we may conclude It is an abuse and utterly Illegall to Prosecute Protestants on such Laws as were made solely and wholly against Papists as will further appear in our next Observation and we have heard some Judges have declared so much However I shall here add the Judgment of the House of Commons in the Case for tho I know and own a vote of either or both Houses cannot Repeal a Law nor alter its sense yet certainly the House consisting of so many wise discreet persons a great number of them Excellently Learned in the Laws they are as like to Interpret a doubtful Law and hit upon the true Interpretation how far and to what it does extend as two or three little swaggering Justices or any single Judge At least were I an Officer I should rather incline to credit their opinion not run an hazard by employing the Toils made for restraining the Wolves and the Foxes to intangle destroy the Innocent sheep meerly because they do not all exactly tread in the very same steps and bite punctually all of one Sort of Grass Sabbati Sexto die Nov. 1680. Resolved Nemine contradicente That it is the opinion of this House That the Acts of Parliament made in the Reigns of Queen Elizabeth and King James against Popish Recusants ought not to be extended against Protestant dissenters And now having discharged these unlawful weapons let 's see what Legal Arms there are or have been really formed against the Sectaries And the first was the very sword of Goliah there was none like it 1. I mean the Act of 35 Eliz. Ca. 1. which some would make us believe has had as many Lives as a Cat intituled An Act to Retain the Queen's Majesties Subjects in their due Obedience This was the first Law that was made since the Reformation against those we commonly called Sectaries Conventiclers or Protestant Dissenters and this Act indeed beyond all dispute was made against them and them only for the Popish Recusants are expresly Excepted out of it as appears by the Act And that the Reader may better judge of the true difference between this Act and those others before recited made against Popish Recusants by the style and expressions I shall here insert the first Paragraph and give you the substance of the rest of it For the preventing and avoiding of such great Inconveniencies and Perils as might happen and grow by the wicked and dangerous practices of seditious Sectaries and disloyal Persons Be it Enacted by the Queen 's most Excellent Majesty and by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament Assembled and by the Authority of the same That if any person or persons above the Age of sixteen years which shall obstinately Refuse to Repair to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common-Prayer to hear Divine Service Established by Her Majesties Laws and Statutes in that behalf made and shall forbear to do the same by the space of one month next after without any lawful cause shall at any time after forty daies next after the End of this Session of Parliament by Printing Writing or Express Words or Speeches advisedly or purposely practise or go about to make or persuade any of Her Majesties Subjects or any other within her Highness's Realms or Dominions to deny withstand and impugn Her Majesties Power and Authority in cases Ecclesiastical United and Annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm or to that end or purpose shall advisedly or maliciously move or persuade any other person whatsoever to forbear or abstain from coming to Church to hear Divine Service or to Receive the Communion according to Her Majesties Laws and Statutes aforesaid or to come to or be present at any unlawful Assemblies Conventicles or Meetings under colour or pretence of any Exercise of Religion contrary to Her Majesties Laws and Statutes or if any person or persons which shall obstinately Refuse to Repair to some Church by the space of one month to hear Divine Service as is aforesaid shall after the said forty daies either of him or themselves or by the Motion Persuasion Inticement or Allurement of any other willingly Joyn in or be present at any such Assemblies Conventicles or Meeting under colour or pretence of any such Exercise of Religion contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm as is aforesaid That then every such person so offending as aforesaid and being thereof lawfully convicted shall be Committed to Prison and there to Remain without Bail or Mainprise until they shall Conform and yield themselves to come to some Church Chapel or usual place of Common-Prayer and hear Divine Service c. Then the Act goes on and provides That if the person do not Conform within three months after Conviction he should Abjure that is be Banisht and swear never to come back without leave And if he will not swear so then the same to be Felony without Benefit of Clergy From which Act these 3 things are observable 1. That the same was wholly intended against the Puritanes or Sectaries for the Papists are expresly exempted by a particular clause Sect. 12. in these words ' Provided that No Popish Recusant or Feme Covert shall be compelled or bound to abjure by vertue of this Act. 2. That Q. Eliz. and her wise Parliament did not intend or take such Protestant Recusants to be within the meaning of or punishable by the other before mentioned Statutes against popish Recusants For if they had so understood they might have punished them sufficiently on those old Laws without giving themselves the trouble of making this new Law against them Frustra fit per plura quod fieri potest per pauciora God and the Law do nothing in vain 3. If it be objected That all those Laws as well as this ought to be construed to one
and the same end scope and that all the before mentioned Acts of Qu. Elizabeth and K. James are equally to be applied to all Dissenters from the Establisht Church of England I answer that cannot be for since in this Act no Papists are concerned being particularly exempted as aforesaid Then it necessary follows if the Popish Recusants shall not be punished by this Act made against Sectaries and seditious Conventiclers that then the Sectaries and Conventiclers Protestant Dissenters that is Protestant Recusants for that 't is they aim at to colour the laying the other Acts upon them shall not be prosecuted upon those Laws made only against Popish Recusants for if they should then you leave the Protestant Recusants in a far worse condition than the Papists the one being provided and not the other But still note that all that I have said about this Act of the 35. of Eliz. comparing it with the others made against Popish Recusants is only to shew the nature of the one and the other For the truth is this Act of the 35th of Eliz. is not now in force As appears thus 1. The very words thereof shew it to have been originally but a temporary Act for the last words of it are these This Act to continue no longer than to the end of the next Session of Parliament 2. By several Acts it was continued till the 1st year of K. James and then it was enacted that the same should be continued and remain in Force untill the end of the first Session of the next Parliament 3. The second and next Session of Parliament began and holden by Prorogation the 5th of Nov. in the 3d year of K. James and ended the 27th of May next and was then prorogued to the 18th of Nov. 1606. In which Session there was no continuance of this Statute of the 35th of Eliz. so that there it expired absolutely ceased and was of no more force than if it had never been and so continued for many years buried in Oblivion 4. In a Parliament held the 21. of K. James ca. 28. It is amongst other things enacted ' That this Statute of the 35. of El●z shall be adjudged ever since the Session in the Seventh Year of His Majesties Reign of England to have been of such force and effect as the same were the last day of that Session and from thenceforth to the end of the first Session of the next Parliament But the truth is that the said Statute of the 35th of Eliz. was in no force nor of any effect at the last day of the Session in the 7th year of K. James being expired and gone long before viz in the 3. year of that King as aforesaid And being so down then this Stat. of the 21. Jacobi can no way set it up again for this only sets up what was in force in that Session of the 7th of K. James and no otherwise 5. So likewise in the 3. Caroli primi cap. 4. this Act amongst others is mentioned but how That it shall continue to the end of the first Session of the next Parliament in such force and effect as it was the first year of Charles the first when indeed it was then in no force at all 6. In the 16th Caroli secundi cap. 4. an Act was made Intituled An Act to prevent and suppress seditious Conventicles Which begins thus Whereas an Act made in the 35th year of the Reign of our late Soveraign Lady Queen Eliz. Intituled An Act to retain the Queens Majesties Subjects in their due Obedience hath not been put in Execution by reason of some doubt of late made whether the said Act be still in force although it be very clear and evident And it is hereby declared that the said Act is still in force and ought to be put in Execution For providing therefore of further and more speedy Remedies c. Be it enacted c. And the last clause of this Statute of the 16 Car. 2di runs thus Provided that this Act continue in force for 3 years after the end of this present Session of Parliament and from thence to the end of the next Session of Parliament after the said 3 years and no longer Now how far these words It is hereby declared that it is in force and ought to be put in execution without saying it is hereby enacted that it shall be in force might operate to give some Life and strength to the aforesaid expired Statute of the 35th of Eliz. I shall not determine But suppose it were thereby set on foot again this last Statute is but one intire Statute and that part which declares or inables the Statute of the 35th of Eliz. to be in force is joined and annexed to the rest and is altogether but one Law and hath its period at the time before prefixed and then that declarative part must die with the rest Now that Session wherein this Statute of 16 Car. 2. was made ended the 16th and 17th of Car. 2. Then the three Years for which it was to continue commenc'd and ended the 20th Car. 2d but after the three years it was to continue till the next Session of Parliament which next Session after the three years began 10. October 1667. and by Adjournments was continued to the 24th of October 1670 being the 22d of Car. 2d and then was the end of that and with it this Conventicle Act expired so that now there is no pretence of the 35th of Elizabeth's being in force for the declarative part in this Conventicle Act cannot enforce or give Life to any thing longer than it lives itself For if the Declaring part of this Act after it self is extinguisht can be read urg'd or construed as a Law to enforce and enliven another Statute which hath no being of a Law in it self then it would necessarily follow that an expired Law is as Authentick as a Law in being which is absurd From what hath been said it appears That as Protestant Dissenters ought not to be prosecuted on the Laws made against Popish Recusants so likewise 't is very evident That both the Statute of the 35th of Eliz. and also that of the 16th of Car. secundi are Expired and of no force And indeed 't is happy for the Nation that they are so for had these two Acts been still in force being of a cruel sanguinary nature much mischief might have accrewed to the people of this Kingdom So that there are now no Laws in being to punish the Conventiclers and the Nonconformist Ministers who did not Conform to the Act of Uniformity made in this King's Reign but the Act commonly called the 5 Mile or Oxford Act And the Conventicle Act made the 22th of this King These we shall severally consider Anno 17. Caroli Secundi Ca. 2. An Act for Restraining Nonconformists from Inhabiting in Corporations Whereas divers Parsons Vicars Curates Lecturers and other persons in holy Orders have not declared their unfeigned
be Indicted for Burglary 7. There is no power given to break Doors for Levying the Penalties therefore let the Constables and Officers be wary what they do in that Case 8. Constables would do well to know and assert the Dignity of their Office they are not to run up and down like Lacquies after the Capricio's of every Justice and spend the Lords day Prophanely in hunting after Meetings if the Justices are upon sufficient Oath Inform'd of a Meeting and will make out a Warrant specifying where it is you 'l goe but to ramble about with them from this place to that you are not obliged no more are you to seize or Imprison persons on the verbal Command of any Justice unless in visible Breach of the Peace but you must have a Warrant specifying the persons Name and Offence before you can lay hold of him or else you may repent it when sued another day for false Imprisonment 9. Since by the Statute of the 29 of Car. 2d. Cap. 7. It is Enacted in these words Provided also that no Person or Persons upon the Lords day shall serve or Execute or cause to be served or Executed any Writ Process Warrant Order Judgment or Decree except in cases of Treason Felony or Breach of the Peace but that the service of every such Writ Process Warrant c. shall be void to all Intents and Purposes whatsoever and the Person or Persons so Serving or Executing the same shall be as liable to the suit of the party grieved and answer Damages to him for doing thereof as if he or they had done the same without any Writ Process Warrant Order Judgment or Decree at all It will concern all Constables and Officers to consider with what safety they can execute any such Warrants at all on the Lords day on peaceable Meetings it being evident that every man they disturb by Colour of such Warrant on that day has by this Statute a good Action against them And so much for Laws against Dissenters In the next place according to our Promise we shall here add an Abstract of the Laws against Popery and Papists and perhaps as 't is said where there are most Laws there are most Offences so here we may say though there be such abundance of Acts of such severe and various Penalties yet there are scarce any sort of Criminals more rarely brought to Conviction or Punishment THE second Refusal of the Oath of Supremacy punisht as High Treason 5 Eliz. 1. To maintain or Extol Authority of the Sea of Rome the second time High Treason 5 Eliz. 1. To obtain or put in Use any Bull from Rome High Treason 13 Eliz. 2. To perswade or Reconcile OR TO BE RECONCILED to the Roman Religion High Treason 23 Eliz. 1. 3 Jac. 4. For Jesuite or Priest made by Authority from the Pope to come into or remain in the Kings Dominions High Treason 27 Eliz. 2. So for remaining in a Seminary six Months after Proclamation and afterward Returning High Treason 27 Eliz. 2. For Concealing of a Bull or other Instrument from Rome or reconciliation offer'd Punisht as Misprision of Treason 13 Eliz. 2. To maintain or conceal those who perswade or are Reconciled to the Roman Religion Misprision of Treason 23 Eliz. 1. To Receive Relieve Comfort Jesuit or Priest knowing him to be such Punisht as Felony 27 Eliz. 2. To go and serve a Foreign Prince having not before taken the Oath of Allegiance and entred Bond not to be Reconciled to the Roman Religion Felony 3 Jac. 4. The first Refusal of the Oath of Supremacy is Punisht as in Case of a Premunire which imports a forfeiture of all Lands and Goods Imprisonment for Life and a Deprivement of the Benefit of Law 5 Eliz. 1. To set forth or defend Power Spiritual in the Sea of Rome Premunire 5 Eliz. 1. To Bring or Receive any Agnus Dei Crosses Pictures or such like from Rome Premunire 13 Eliz. 2. 23 Eliz. 1. To aid any Person who hath put in Use any Bull from the Sea of Rome Premunire 13 Eliz. 2. 23 Eliz. 1. To send or give Relief to any continuing in Colledges or Seminaries beyond Sea Premunire 27 Eliz. 2. Refusal of the Oath of Allegiance upon the second Tender Premunire 3 Jac. 4. 7 Jac. 6. For not Discovering of Priests made beyond the Seas Imprisonment 27 Eliz. 2. Upon Indictment of Recusancy by Proclamation Imprisonment 29 Eliz. 6. Those that are not able or fail to pay their Forfeitures are to be Imprisoned until Payment or Conformity 23 Eliz. 1. Women Covert Imprisoned for Refusal of the Oath of Allegiance 3 Jac. 4. For non-Payment of twelve pence for every Sunday Imprisonment 3 Jac. 4. Women Covert Convicted for Recusancy Imprisoned till her Husband pay ten Pounds a Month or a third part of his Lands 7 Jac. 6. Standing Excommunicated for Recusancy House may be broken up for his Apprehension 7 Jac. 6. Those who shall forbear to come to Church by the space of twelve Months bound to good Behaviour with Surety in the Kings-Bench 23 Eliz. 1. Every Recusant is Confin'd to five Miles Compass for Life 23 Eliz. 2. To ten Miles distant from London 3 Jac. 5. Not to come into the House where the King or his Heir Apparent is 3 Jac. 5. For absence from Church-Service every Sunday twelve pence forfeited 1 Eliz. 2. And for every Holiday twelve pence forfeited 3 Jac. 4. For absence from Common prayer every Month twenty Pounds forfeited 23 Eliz. 1. 3 Jac. 4. For default of payment of twenty Pounds a Month all Goods two parts of Land and Leases forfeited 29 Eliz. 6. 3 Jac. 4. At the Kings Election to take or refuse twenty Pounds a Month or to take two parts of the Recusants Estate 3 Jac. 4. All Copy-hold Lands of Recusants forfeited 25 Eliz. 2. The Forfeitures of the Ancestor charged upon his Heir being a Recusant 1 Jac. 4. A Recusant forfeits for not Receiving the Sacrament according to the Service Book the first year twenty Pounds the second year forty Pounds the third year and every year after sixty Pounds 3 Jac. 4. To the Presenter out of the Recusants Goods forty Shillings forfeited 3 Jac. 4. For every Recusant sojourner and Servant ten Pounds for every Month forfeited 3 Jac. 4. Two parts of Dower or Joynture of a Married Woman forfeited 3 Jac. 5. Coming to Court an hundred Pounds forfeited 3 Jac. 5. For not Baptizing of Children according to the Service-Book publickly within a Month after their Birth an hundred Pound forfeited 3 Jac. 5. For Marrying otherwise than by a Minister an hundred Pounds forfeited 3 Jac. 5. For Burying out of the Church or Church-yard an hundred Pounds forfeited 3 Jac. 5. For sending Children beyond Seas without License an hundred Pounds forfeited 1 Jac. 4. For maintaining a School-master not going to Church or allowed to teach for every Month ten Pounds forfeited 23 Eliz. 1. 29 Eliz. 6. And forty Shillings per
Diem forfeited by the School-master and Recusant that keeps him 1 Jac. 4. All Goods and Lands during Life for Breach of Confinement forfeited 23 Eliz. 2. 3 Jac. 5. The like forfeiture for going or sending Children beyond the Seas to be Bred in Popery 3 Car. 2. For Residing within ten Miles of London an hundred Pounds forfeited 3 Jac. 5. For Practising any Function expressed in the Statute of 3 Jac. 5 an hundred Pounds forfeited 3 Jac. 5. Disabled to Reverse Indictment for want of Form or other Defect 3 Jac. 4. Disabled from the Practise of several Functions whereby to gain their Livings viz. from practising Common Law Civil Law or being a Steward Attorney Solicitor or Officer in any Court from Practising Physick or being Apothecary and from Bearing any Office in Camp Troop or Band of Soldiers or in any Ship Castle or Fortress c. 3 Jac. 5. By the Wifes Recusancy the Husband Disabled from Publick Office or Charge in the Common-Wealth 3 Jac. 5. By Marrying otherwise than the Church of England alloweth the Husband disabled to be Tenant by Courtesie the Wife disabled to have Dower Jointure Free Banks or any part or Portion of her Husbands Goods 3 Jac. 5. Disabled to Sue or Prosecute Actions to present to a Benefice to be Executor Administrator or Guardian 3 Jac 5. Children sent beyond the Seas without License are disabled to take Benefit of Gift Conveyance Descent or Devise 1 Jac. 4. 3 Jac. 5. Notwithstanding these Forfeitures Recusants are no less Subject to Ecclesiastical Sentences 23 Eliz. 1. 3 Jac. 45. But Quaere Whether one Papist was quâ Talis ever Excommunicated since the Kings happy Restauration though many thousand Protestants have been Refusal to Receive the Sacrament and take the Oaths of Supremacy and Allegiance Ipso facto disables from any publick Trust 25 Car. 2. ca. 2. Peers and Members of Parliament disabled to Sit untill taking of Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy and declaring against Transubstantiation and the Idolatry of Rome 30 Car. 2. Stat. 2. Having thus Collected together divers of the most remarkable and advantagious of our Laws whereby the Liberties of English-men are Guarded and Secured since the best of Laws are but insignificant Cyphers if not Honestly put in Execution and since in the Execution of our Laws JVRIES are mainly concern'd who if Ignorant of their Duty or Corrupt or Over-awed and not daring to make use of that just power wherewith the Law hath invested and intrusted them may give up all those precious Priviledges and subject us to the worst kind of slavery under pretence of Law therefore here in the last place for the Information of my honest Country-men the Freeholders of England and others who in Corporations are daily call'd to this important Service I shall subjoin a brief discourse of Juries SECT I. Of the Advantages Englishmen enjoy by this Trial by Juries above any other Nation under Heaven 'T IS one of the miserable Follies of depraved humane Nature that it commonly sleights present Enjoyments and rarely rates the good things it possesses at their true value till 't is deprived of them This grand Priviledge of Trials per pais by our Countrey that is by JVRIES as it seems to have been as Ancient as the Government or first form of Policy in this Island for it was not unknown to the ancient Brittains as appears by their Books and Monuments of Antiquity Practised by the Saxons see King Ethelreds Laws in Lambert p. 218. and Coke 1. part Instit fo 155. and Confirmed since the Invasion of the Normans by Magna Charta as you have heard and continual Usage so it is a thing of the highest Moment and an essential Felicity to all English Subjects For look abroad in France Spain Italy or indeed almost where you will and observe the miserable Condition of the Inhabitants either intirely subjected to the Arbitrary Lusts of Tyrants who plunder dismember or slay them according as the humour takes them and many times without the least provocation meerly for sport and to Gratifie a savage Cruelty Or at best you will behold them under such Laws as render their Lives Liberties and Estates liable to be disposed of at the discretion of Strangers appointed their Judges most times mercenary and Creatures of Prerogative sometimes malicious and oppressive and too often partial and corrupt Or suppose them never so just and upright yet still has the Subject no security against subornations and the attacques of malicious false and unconscionable Witnesses yea when there is no sufficient Evidence upon meer suspicions they are obnoxious to the Tortures of the Rack which often make an Innocent man Confess himself Guilty meerly to get out of present pain Or if he do with invincible Courage endure the Question as they call those Torments he is many times so spoiled in his Limbs as he scarce ever is his own man again Whereas such has been the goodness of God and the prudent care of our Ancestors that to our inestimable Happiness we are born and live under a mild and Righteous Constitution where all these mischiefs may be prevented where none can be Legally condemned either by the power of Superior Enemies or the rashness or Ill will of any Judge nor by the bold Affirmations of profligate Evidence For by a fundamental Law in our Government No mans Life unless it be in Parliaement which is a Supream Court and 't is supposed will never do any man wrong shall be touched for any Crime whatsoever but upon being found Guilty on two several Trials for so may that of the Grand and Petty Jury be called and the Judgment of twice Twelve men at least all of his own Condition and Neighbourhood and upon their Oaths Coke 3. part of Instit p. 40. That is to say Twelve or more to find the Bill of Indictment against him and Twelve others to give Judgment upon the General Issue of Not Guilty All which Jurors must be honest substantial Impartial men and being Neighbours of the party accused or place where the supposed Fact was committed cannot be presumed to be unacquainted either with the matters charged the Prisoners course of Life or the Credit of the Evidence And all these must first be fully satisfied in their Consciences that he is Guilty and so unanimously pronounce him upon their Oaths or else he cannot be condemned For the Office and Power of these Juries is Judicial They only are the Judges from whose sentence the Indicted are to expect Life or Death upon their Integrity and Understanding the Lives of all that are brought into Judgment do ultimately depend From their Verdict there lies no Appeal By finding Guilty or Not Guilty they do complicately resolve both Law and Fact Judges are made by Prerogative and many times heretofore they have been preferred by Corrupt Ministers of State and may be so again in Time to come and such advanced as would serve a present Turn not
always those of the most Integrity and Skill in the Laws Their places are so Honourable and Profitable and their Tenure so Ticklish viz. durante beneplacito meerly during pleasure that they lie under no small Temptations which perhaps with some may be never the less unlikely to prevail for their having generally been wont before to take Fees They are concern'd in so many Causes that they are the oftner subject to be tempted and are so few that they may be the easier corrupted They cannot be Challenged and may be apt to think themselves above any Action and thence be encouraged to strain a point now and then The major part of them agreeing is enough they are never sworn at each particular Trial nor ever at all but once and that exceeding generally I say all these things may possibly sometimes happen to Biass some Judges for I intend not the least Reflection hereby on any of those Honourable Persons who at present deservedly supply our seats of Justice But nothing of that kind can reasonably happen to a Jury For 1. They are return'd by a sworn Officer 2. Must be men of a clear Reputation and competent Estate 3. Being Neighbours they may know something of the business on their own knowledge 4. Their Office is but a trouble not accompanyed with any great Honour nor any profit at all 5. They are all solemnly sworn to each particular Cause 6. The party may challenge 35 in case of Treason and 20 of them in Felony without shewing any cause and as many more as he can assign cause against 7. Of the Grand Jury Twelve at least must joyn in the Verdict and of the petty Jury every man of the Twelve must consent upon his Oath or else 't is all nothing And lastly if they give a corrupt Verdict between Party and Party they are liable to an Attaint But I do not find any Attaint lies in Criminal Causes where the King is a Party Now let any man of Sence consider whether this method be not more proper for bolting out the Truth for finding out the Guilty and preserving the Innocent than if the whole decision were left to the Examination of a Judge or two or three whose Interests Passion Haste or Multiplicity of business may easily betray them into Error Deservedly therefore is this Priviledge of Tryal by Juries rank'd amongst the choicest of our Fundamental Laws which whosoever shall goe about openly to Suppress or craftily to Vndermine and render only a Formality does Ipso Facto attacque the Government and brings in an Arbitrary Power and is an Enemy and Traitor to his King and Countrey For which reason English Parliaments have all along been most Zealous for preserving this great Jewel of Liberty Trials by Juries having no less than 58. several times since the Norman Conquest been established and Confirmed by the Legislative Power no one Priviledge besides having been neer so often remembred in Parliament SECT II. What persons ought to be Jury-men and how Qualified AS the Office of Juries is of such great Importance so the Wisdom of our Law has provided that the same shall be supplyed with Persons of Ability Honesty Integrity and Indifferency for as my Lord Cook saith 1. part Instit Sect. 234. fo 155. He that is of a Jury must be Liber Homo that is not only a Free man and not Bond but also one that hath such Freedome of mind as he stands indifferent as he stands unsworn 2. He must be Legalis and by the Law every Juror that is returned for the Trial of any Issue or Cause ought to have three properties 1. He ought to be dwelling most near to the place where the Question is moved 2. He ought to be most sufficient both for understanding and Competency of Estate 3. He ought to be least Suspicious that is to be indifferent as he stands Unsworn and then he is acounted in Law Liber Legalis homo otherwise he may be Challenged and not suffered to be Sworn but a mans being Excommunicated as was said before is no Barr to his being a Jury man much less his being a Dissenter or Non-frequenter of Church Ceremonies if he be otherwise qualified with Estate and Understanding for at that rate if Popery should ever get uppermost No Protestant at all would be capable of being a Jury-Man because a Non-Conformist to Holy Church Now if no Statute excludes Protestants unconvicted of any Crime or Dissenters quâ tales to serve on Juries I should think we ought to wait at least till an Act of Parliament be made to that purpose before we deny them Liberam Legem and to Act otherwise in my silly Opinion seems not only unwarrantable but a daring Usurpation of Legislative Power In a word Jurors must be free of and from all manner of Bondage Obligations Affections Relations and Prejudices they must be the Peers or Equals of the party they are to Try they must be of full Age 21 Years old or upwards not Outlaw'd never Attainted or Convicted of Treason Felony False Verdict Perjury or adjudged Infamous they were anciently all Knights as we read in Glanvil and Bracton and they must still be persons of worth and repute and as they are returned by a Sworn Officer the Sheriff so they of the petty Jury must be every one Sworn every several Trial by a particular Oath the more to remind them of their Duty Nay it should seem in ancient times thō the Office and Duty were still the same as at this day yet their Honour and Dignity were much greater The Mirrour of Justices a great part of which was Written before the Conquest and augmented by Andrew Horn a Learned Lawyer in the time of King Edw. the 2d p. 209. in the French and 153. in the English makes no scruple to call them JVDGES Judges Ordinaries sunt Suitors and Dr. Cowel in his Interpreter tells us Juries were anciently Associates and Assistants to the Judges of the Court in a kind of Equality whereas now a dayes they attend them in great Humility And cites the Customary of Normandy and Lambert as being of the same Sentiment Nay many Wise and Learned men have wondred that since the Law has conferr'd such ample power on Jury-men why they should have no kind of mark of Honour or Distinction as liberty to Sit with their Hats on from the time they are Sworn to the Delivery of their Verdict or the like For as the Custom is now a dayes they sitting amongst the Croud with their Caps off as well as the worst Malefactors they are to Trye 't is not easie knowing them from the rest of the Spectators But this Obiter I desire not to bring in Innovations but only that English men may preserve their ancient undoubted Priviledges to which purpose it will concern all that are liable to be Summoned to serve on Juries heedfully to Inform themselves of their Duty and Office by Law that so they may uprightly discharge the
same to God and the King and their fellow Subjects SECT III. Of Grand Juries their Duty and the great Importance of their Office JUries are of two sorts 1 The Grand Jury so called both because it consists of a greater number than Twelve as commonly 21 19 17. or the like but note they can make no Verdict or Presentment unless Twelve at least of them agree and then what they do is Valid thô the rest do not Consent as also because generally they are of the greater quality and likewise in respect of their Power because the extent of their Office is more great and general as extending to all Offences throughout the whole County for which they serve 2. The Petty Jury in Cases Criminal called commonly the Jury of Life and Death which alwaies consists of Twelve men neither more nor less who must every Man agree or else it is no Verdict The Oath of a Grand Jury-man as I find it Inserted in the Collection Intituled The Book of Oaths p. 206. is as follows YE shall truly inquire and due presentment make of all such things as you are charged withall on the Kings behalf The Kings Council your own and your Fellows you shall well and truely keep and in all other things the Truth present So help you God and by the Contents of this Book But according to modern practice and as we find it Published in the account of the late Proceedings against the Right Honourable the Earl of Shaftsbury said to be Publisht by his Majesties special Command is expressed somewhat more largely The Oath Administred to the Grand Jury as follows YOU shall diligently Inquire and true Presentment make of all such matters Articles and things as shall be given you in charge as of all other matters and things as shall come to your knowledge touching this present Service the Kings Council your Fellows and your own you shall keep secret you shall present no person for Hatred or Malice neither shall you leave any one unpresented for Fear Favour or Affection for Lucre or Gain or any hopes thereof but in all things you shall present the truth the whole Truth and nothing but the Truth to the best of your knowledge So help you God The Office of a Grand Jury or Grand Inquest for by both those Names 't is promiscuously call'd is principally concern'd in two things Presentments and Indictments the difference of which is thus The First is when the Jury themselves of their own knowledge or Inquiry do take notice of some Crime Offence or Nusance to the injury of the Publick which they think fit should be Punished or removed and in Order thereunto do give the Court notice thereof in Writing briefly and without Form onely the Nature of the thing and the Persons Name and the Place And this is call'd a Presentment being the matter whereon to form an Indictment from which the Presentment differs in these two respects 1. In that is always Originally the Act of the Grand Jury And 2. That is not yet drawn up in Form whereas Indictments are commonly drawn up either by the Order of the Court or at the Instance of some Prosecutor and are brought before and delivered unto the Grand Jury and the Witnesses Sworn attend them who Examine the said Witnesses and as they think fit Return the Indictments indors'd either Billa Vera that is a true Bill or Ignoramus We are Ignorant that is we do not find the matter or there does not appear to us such sufficient Grounds for the Accusation that the Persons Life and Reputation should be brought into question From whence it appears that the end of their Office is likewise two-fold 1. To inquire after and give notice of all Crimes Offences Nusances c. in the County for which they Serve which by reason of their Inhabitancy and Estates therein they are presumed to have best opportunity to discover and to find Bills against Malefactors where there are good Grounds for the same that so they may be brought to Trial if they are forth-coming or may be proceeded against to the Outlawry if they are fled for their said Offences 2. To preserve the Innocent from the disgrace and hazards which ill men may design to bring them to out of malice or through subornation or other sinister ends for so tender is the Law of the Reputation and Life of a man that it will not suffer the one to be sullied by the Parties holding up his hand at the Barr and the other endanger'd by a Trial untill first the Matter and Evidence against him have been scann'd examined and found by a Grand Jury upon their Oaths against him Therefore you see by their Oaths They are sworn not only to Inquire but diligently to inquire not to be negligent or slothful nor to take things upon trust or hurry them over carelesly but to weigh the Circumstances and sift the Witnesses and search out the Truth of such Informations as come before them and to reject the Indictment if it be not sufficiently proved and if they have reasonable Suspicion of Malice Subornation or wicked Designs against any mans Life or Estate in such as offer or come to Swear to the Bill of Indictment they are bound by Law as well as in Conscience to use all diligence to discover the Villany and if it appear to them whereof they are the Legal Judges to be a Conspiracy or malicious Conspiracy against the Accused they are bound not only to reject such Bill of Indictment but forthwith to Indict all the Conspirators with their Associates and Abettors and that this is a main part of the Grand Juries Office appears not only from Legal reason but by an express Statute viz. 25 Edw. 3 4. and 42 Edw. 3 3. which sayes That for preventing Mischiefs done by FALSE ACCVSERS none should be put to answer unless it be by Indictment or Presentment of good and lawful People of the same Neighbourhood where such Deeds be done that is to say by a Grand Jury The Grounds upon which Grand Juries are to proceed in giving their Verdicts are either 1. From their own knowledge and so they may find an Indictment against a person thô there be never a Witness at all to it and a Petty Jury may in like manner find a person Guilty of a Felony or Murder whereof he stands Indicted thô no Witnesses appear against him to prove it and the reason thereof is because the Juries being always of the Vicinage the Law supposes they may know the matter of their own knowledge and therefore in all such Cases when a Jury is charged with a Prisoner and after the Indictment read Witnesses fail to appear the Court always speaks thus to the Jury Gentlemen here is A. B. stands Indicted of such a Crime but here 's no Witnesses come against him so that unless on your own knowledge you know him Guilty you must Acquit him and certainly if the Juries knowledge of a