haeredibus nostris in perpetuum quod Ecclesia Anglicana libera sit habeat omnia iura sua integra libertates suas illaesas We haue graunted vnto God and by this our present writing haue confirmed for vs and for our heyres for ever that the church of England be free and that shee haue all her rights and liberties whole and vnhurt Nowe by this Charter if the same be cōstrued aright there is provision made first that such honour and worship bee yeelded by the King and his subictes his and their successors and posteritie vnto God as truely and in deed belongeth vnto him Secondlie that not onely such rightes and liberties as the King his progenitors but also that such as God had endowed the Church of England with should inviolably be preserued And in verie deed to speake truely properly such rights and liberties onely are to be called the rightes liberties of the church of England which God him selfe hath giuen by his lawe vnto his vniuersall Church not which the Kings of England by their Charter haue bequeathed to the particular church of England When therefore questiō is made that by the great Charter the Kinges of England are bound to maintayne the rights and liberties of the Church of Englande we are to enquire and search what rights and liberties God in his holie word hath granted vnto his vniversall Church and so by consequence vnto the Church of England one part of the Catholike church And this questionlesse was the cause that moved the victorious Prince Henry the eight so effectuallie and powerfully to bend him selfe against the Popes supremacie vsurped at that time over the Church of England For saith the King wee will with hazard of our life and losse of our Crowne vpholde and defend in our Realmes whatsoever wee shall know to be the will of God The church of God then in England not being free nay having her rights and liberties according to the great Charter whole and vnhurt but being in bondage and servitude to the Sea of Rome contrarie to the lawe of God the King iudged it to stande highlie with his honor with his oath according to the measure of knoweledge which then was giuen vnto him to reform redresse amend the abuses of the same Sea If then it might please our gratious Soveraigne Lord King IAMES that now is treading in the godly steppes of his renoumed great Vncle to vouchsafe an abolishment of all lordlie primacie executed by Archiepiscopal Episcopall authoritie over the Ministers of Christ His Highnes in so doing could no more rightlie bee charged with the violation of the great Charter then might King HENRY the eight with the banishment of the Popes supremacie or then our late Soveraigne Ladie the Queene could be iustlie burthened with the breach of her oath by the establishment of the Gospell Nay if the Kings of England by reason of their oath had bin so straightlie tied to the wordes of the great Charter that they might not in anie sort haue disannulled any supposed rightes liberties of the church then vsed and confirmed by the great Charter vnto the church that thē was supposed to be the Church of God in England then belike King Henrie the eight might bee atteinted to haue gone against the great Charter and against his oath whē by the overthrow of Abbayes Monasteries he tooke away the rightes and liberties of the Abbotts and Priors For by expresse wordes of the great Charter Abbotts and Priors had as ample and as large a Patent for their rightes and liberties as our Archb. Bb. can at this day chalenge for their primacies If then the rightes and liberties of the one as being against the lawe of God be duly lawfully taken away notwithstanding any matter clause or sentence conteyned in the great Charter the other haue but litle reason by colour of the great Charter to stand vpon their pantofles and to contend for their painted sheathes For this is a rule maxime in all good lawes that in omni iuramento semper excipitur authoritas maioris vnlesse then they be able to iustifie by the holy scriptures that such rightes and liberties as they pretend for their spirituall primacie over the Ministers of Christ to be granted vnto them by the great Charter be in deed truth likewise confirmed vnto them by the holy law of God I suppose the Kinges Highnes as a successor to King Henrie the third and as a most iust inheritour to the Crown of England by the words of the great Charter and by his oath if once the same were taken to be bound vtterlie to abolish all Lordly primacie as hetherto vpheld and defended partly by ignorance and partlie by an vnreasonable and evill custome Admonition The vse and studie of the civill lawe wil be vtterly overthrown for the Civilians in this Realme live not by the vse of the civill lawe but by the offices of the canon lawe and such things as are within the compasse thereof And if you take those offices and functions away and those matters wherein they deale in the canon lawe you must needes take away the hope of rewarde and by that meanes their whole studie Assertion This collection dependeth vppon his former Reason is borrowed to proue a necessary continuance of canon law and concludeth in effect thus The taking away of the reward and maintenance of Civilians wil bee the overthrowe of the vse and studie of the civill lawe But the taking away of the canon lawe the offices and functions thereof and such things as are within the compasse of the same wil bee the taking away of the reward and maintenance of Civilians Therefore the taking away of the canon lawe wil be the overthrowe of the vse and studie of the civill lawe But we denie the assumption and affirme The maintenance of Civiliās dependeth not vpō the functions of the canon lavve that Civilians might haue farre better reward maintenance then now they haue if the offices and functions of the canon lawe and such things as are conteyned within the same were simply and absolutely taken away And further we say if there were none other vse nor end of the studie of the civill lawe then hope of reward and maintenance by some office function of the canon lawe that then Civilians should in vaine seeke for knowledge in the civill lawe because without the knowledge thereof and by the only knowledge of such things as are within the compasse of the canon law they might reape that rewarde and maintenance Nay sithens by experience wee haue known that some who neuer vnclapsed the institutions of Iustinian out of the same to learne the definition of civill iustice haue bin yet are authorized to exercise the offices and functions of the canon law how should the studie of the civill lawe bee furthered by these offices and functions when as without any knowledge of the civill
of Tythes Testaments and Matrimonie matters also of adulterie slander c. are in these mens iudgments mere teÌ„poral c. therefore to bee dealt in by the temporall Magistrate onely which as yet haue eyther none at all or very fewe lawes touching those things therefore the common lawe of the Realme must by that occasion receaue also a verie great alteration For it wil bee no small matter to applie these things to the temporal law to appoint Courts Officers and manner of processe and proceedings in iudgement for the same Assertion In deed we hold that all these matters whereof mention is here made and all Matters of tythes and other causes of like nature perteine to civill Iustice others of the like nature are merely civill and temporall and by the temporall Magistrate alone to bee dealt in and to be discussed if we consider the administration of externall and civill iustice And this wee thinke wil be graunted of all and not be denied of any vnlesse they be too to popishly addicted In regard whereof wee haue drawen as before is mentioned a proiect howe Courts and maner of processe and proceedinges in iudgement by Doctors of the civill law may be appointed by the King and his high Court of ParleameÌ„t without that that the common law of the Realme by the occasion of any such courts officer or maner of processe and proceedings must receave any alteration at al muchlesse a very great alteration Howbeit if it should not please the King and that the Civilians could not finde favour in his sight by courts offices and maner of processe and proceedings in iudgement before specified or by the like to have the studie of the civill law advanced yet we thinke it convenient once againe to â—owe matters of Tythes c. may be dealt in by the Kings Iudges be examined howe these matters may be dealt in according to the rules grouÌ„dâ— of the common lawe before the Kings Iudges and Iustices of the Kings bench and common pleas By a statute of 32. H. 8. c. 7. it is cleare that all tythes oblations c. and other ecclesiasticall or spirituall profits by the lawe or statutes of the Realme may bee made temporal as being admitted to be abide go to and in temporall hands laye vses and profits From the reason 〈◊〉 which statute it is cleere that those lawâ—â— likewise may be reckoned amongst 〈◊〉 for temporall lawes which by the lawâ—â— and statutes of the Realme may be executed by temporall and lay persons and which are conversant about temporall and lay causes If then the execution of the lawes touching these matters may lawfully remaine abide in the hands of Doctors of the civill law being temporall and lay persons as alreadie vnder the Bishops they doe it can not be denied but that the Kings Iudges and Iusâ—icers of both Benches may be as competible Iudges to put in execution the lawes concerning these matters as Doctors of the civill law or other lay-men be But the causes are not reputed and called temporall lay causes amongst vs. What for that if in their owne nature simply considered these causes bee meerely laye and temporall causes such causes I meane as whereof the King a â—ay civill and temporall Magistrate by his lay civill and temporal Magistracie â—erived vnto him immediatly from the holy law of God may and ought to take â—ognizaÌ„ce thervpoÌ„ either in his own Royall person or by the person of any of his inferior Officers may giue absoâ—te peremptorie iudgement If I say â—hese things be so what booteth it or that wisedom is it contend that these causes and matters have bin and are stil adiudged to be therefore ecclesiasticall no temporal causes because through an abusive speech or through a vaine and evill custome they haue bin so called and accompted in times past And what if it hath pleased the Kinges Progenitors by sufferance to tollerate the execution of such lawes as concerne these things to be in the hands power of Ecclesiasticall persons yet here vpon it followeth not that in very deede and trueth the Magistracie of the said ecclesiasticall persons was an ecclesiasticall Magistracie or that they were ecclesiasticall Magistrats but their Magistracie was and remayned still a temporall magistracie they were and aboade temporall Magistrates For not more can the qualitie of the person alter the nature of the cause then can the qualitie of the cause alter the nature of the person And if it be true that matters determinable in tymes past by a Magistracie abusivelie called ecclesiastical be notwithstandinge properlie temporaâ—â— matters and that the same Magistracie also be a temporall no spirituall Magistracie what a childish poore coÌ„ceit is it to challenge threp vpoÌ„ the teÌ„porall Magistrat that he hath none or verie few temporall lawes touching those matters And that therefore the people should not sollicit an alteratioÌ„ of abuses in Church-goverment least for want of temporall lawes the people should bee without ecclesiasticall discipline It will be no small matter saith hee to applie these things to the temporall lawe yea and so say I to But what of that The question is not how hardly these things may be applied to the temporall lawe but how small a matter it were to applie the temporall law vnto these thinges For it is not said in any law that casus ex iuribus but it is said in all lawes that The temporal law may easily be applied to causes nowe reputed ecclesiasticall ex casibus â—ura nascuntur And in deede the Phisition applieth not the disease to his phisicke but he prepareth his phisicke for the disease The husband-man he measureth not his grouÌ„d by the seed but his seed by the ground The Draper he meateth not his yarde by the cloth but his cloth by the yarde If in like maner the temporall lawes and the grounds and rules thereof were applied to these matters of tythes marriages c. whereof he speaketh what more alteration could there be of the temporall law by such an application then there is an alteration of the pluÌ„met by laying it to the stone or then there is an alteration of the rule or yard by laying them to the timber cloth Besides he that rightly and after an exact equall proportion can apply one rule or maxime of the teÌ„porall lawe to many more cases then wherevn to it hath bin vsually in former times applied he may rather be reputed an additioner then an alterer of the law But how may the temporall lawe be applied to those matters How even so and so as followeth By the statute 32. Howe Tythes may bee recouered in the Kings teÌ„porall Courts H. 8. c. 7. it is declared that tythes oblations c. and other ecclesiastical or spirituall profitts c. beinÌ„g in laye mens handes to laye vses be no more ecclesiasticall but temporall goods and profittes and that if any person were disseysed
deforced wronged or otherwise kept or put from his lawfull inheritaÌ„ce estate seysin c. of in or to the same by anie person clayming or pretending to haue interest or title in or to the same that then in all and euerie such case the person so disseysed deforced or wrongfullie kept from his right or possession shall and may haue his remedie in the Kings temporal Courtes as the case shal require for the recouvery of such inheritance by writt originall c. to be devised and graunted out of the Kinges Court of Chancerie in like maner c. It is there likewise provided that that Act shal not extend nor be expounded to giue anie remedie cause of action or suite in the Courtes temporall against any person which shall refuse to set out his Tythes or which shall deteigne c. his Tythes and offerings But that in all such cases the partie c. having cause to demand or haue the same tythes shal haue his action for the same in the Ecclesiasticall Courtes accordinge to the ordenance in the first part of that act mentioned and none otherwise Now then sit hence euery person whether he be laie or Ecclesiasticall having â—â—ght to demand tythes and offeringes hath the partie from whom those tythes 〈◊〉 due bound obliged vnto him and thence also the partie not dividinge yeelding or paying his tythes doth actuallie and reallie deteigne the same and thereby doth vniustlie wrong the partie to whom they be due contrarie to iustice the Kings lawes sithence I say these things be so what alteratioÌ„ or disadvantage could befall or ensue to the common law or the Professors thereof if so bee it might please the King with his Parleament to haue the last part of this Act so to be explaned extended and enlarged as that the same might giue remedie in the Kings temporall Courts by writt original to be devised granted out of the ChaÌ„cerie against any person deteigning his tythes and offeringsâ— the Hospitall of St Leonards in Yorke of the Kings foundatioÌ„ and Patronage Hospitall of S. Leonard 1. 2. H. 6. c 2 endowed of a thrave of corne to be taken yerely of euery plouÌ„gh earing with in the Counties of Yorke Comberlande Westmerland and Lancaster hauing no sufficient or covenable remedie at the common law against such as withheld the same thraves it was ordeigned by the King in Parleament that the Maister of the said Hospitall and his successors might haue actions by writt or plaintes of debt or detinue at their pleasure against all and every of them that deteyned the same thraves for to recover the same thraves with their damages And by a statute 32. H. 8. c. 44. it is enacted That the Parsons and Curates of five parish churches whereinto the Towne of Roysen did extend it selfe and everie of them the successors of every of them shall haue their remedie by authoritie of that Act to sue demaund aske recover in the Kings Court of Chancerie the Tythes of corne hay wooll lambe and calfe subtracted or denyed to bee paide by any person or persons Againe Vicars Parsons or Improprietaries do implead any man in the ecclesiasticall Court for tythes of wood beeing of the age of 20. yeeres or aboue for tyth-hay out of a medow for the which tyme out of mind memorie of man there hath onely some Meade-silver bin paied or if a debate hang in a spirituall Court for the right of tythes having his originall from the right of Patronage the â—uaÌ„tite of the same tythes do passe the â—urth part of the value of the benefice prohibition in all these and sundrie other cases doth lie and the matters are to be tried and examined in the Kinges Courts according to the course of the common lawe vnlesse vpon iust cause there be graunted a consultation And if in these cases in maintenance of the common law the defendants haue relief in the Kinges Courts I thinke it more meete to leave it to the consideration rather of coÌ„mon then to the iudgemeÌ„t of canon Lawiers to determine what alteration the common law could sustayne in case all Plaintiffes aswell as some defendants might pray the Kings ayd for the recovery of tythes especially seeing at this day the maner of paying tythes in England for the most part is now limited by the coÌ„mon and statute lawes of the Realm and not by any forraigne canon law Obiect But there is some fact happely so difficile so secreat and so mystical in these causes of tythes as the same cannot without a very great alteration of the common law be so much as opened before a lay Iudge or of the hidden knowledge wherof the Kings temporall Iudges are not capable Answere Why then let vs see of what nature that inextricable fact may bee I haue perused many libels made and exhibited before the ecclesiasticall What facts touching the witholding of tythes are examinable in the ecclesiasticall Courts Iudges yea and I haue read them over and over and yet for grounde of complaint did I never perceave any other materiall and principall kinde of facte ' examinable in those Courts but onely such as follow First that the partie agent is eyther Rector Vicar Proprieiarie or Possessor of such a Parish-Church and of the Rectorie Vicarage farm possession or dominion of the same and by vertue thereof hath right vnto all Tythes oblations c. apparteyning to the same Church and growing with on the same Parish bounds limitts or places tythable of the same Secondly that his predecessors Rectors Vicars c. tyme out of minde and memorie of man haue quietly and peaceably receaued and had all and singular Tythes oblations c increasing growing and renuing within the Parish c. and that they and he haue bin and are in peaceable possession of hauing and receaving Tythes oblations c. Thirdly that the partie defendant hath had and received in such a yere c. of so many sheepe feeding and couching within the said Parish c. so many fleeces of woll and of so many ewes so many lambes c. Fourthly that the defendant hath not set out yealded or paid the Tyth of the wooll and lambe and that every Tyth fleece of the said wooll by common estimation is worth so much and that every Tyth lamb by coÌ„mon estimation is likewise worth so much c. Fiftly that the defendant is subiect to the iurisdiction of that Court wherevnto hee is sommoned Lastly that the defendant doth hetherto deny or delay to pay his Tythes notwithstanding hee hath bin requested there vnto These and such like are the chief matters The Kinges Iustices are as able to iudge of exceptions against tithes as the ecclesiastical Iudges of fact wherevpon in the ecclesiasticall Courts proofes by witnesses or recordes rest to be made for the recoverie of tythes And who knoweth not but that these facts vpon proofes made before the Kinges Iustices may aswell bee decided by
State and people Nay since the payment of tythes for service accoÌ„plished in the spiritual Sanctuarie is correspoÌ„dent in the nature thereof to the equitie of the Lawe of Moyses for the Levites attendance about the earthlie Tabernacle and since also wee be bound by the coÌ„maundement of the Apostle to make him that teacheth vs in the word to bee partaker of all our goodes I see not so Iewish and popish ceremonie and superstition be avoyded but that this duetie may as christianlie be performed by the payment of the trenth part of the increase of our corne hay wooll lambe c. as by the eight twelfeth twentieth or any other part of our money and coyne By payment also of which tythes the Ministers at everie season with everie kinde of necessarie provisioÌ„ towards hospitalitie might thoroughlie be furnished which manie times they shall want by reason of mens backwardnes when collections of money are to be made But to speake no more of this matter of tythes we will returne to the obiection made against the Apostolicall government drawen from taking away impropriations And herein we wil not handle whether the lawes whereby impropriations do stande as mens lawfull possession and heritage must as he saieth bee taken away but whether impropriations now devided from the Ministerie and dispersed into many severall mens handes and imployed to many vses in the common weale may not in tract of time by some whole some lawe be reduced eyther wholie or in part to be the only lawful possessions and inheritances for the Ministers of the Gospell yea and that without any preiudice or damage vnto Prince or people It is evident in the eyes of all thatthe Churches now appropried do stand remaine as the lawfull possessions inheritances either of the King or of the Nobles or of the Knightes Esquyres Gentlemen and other temporall persons or of Archbb. Bb. Archdeacons Deanes Prebendaries and other ecclesiasticall persons or of the Vniversities of the Colledges in the Vniversities of collegiate and Cathedrall Churches of Scholes Hospitalls Fraternities and other bodies Politicke and Corporate Wherefore to the end our meaning may the better be vnderstood and that wee may proceed orderlie we think it good to examine first by how many severall wayes some of these impropriations may be wholy and thoroughly reduced secondlie by how many several meanes other some in part may be brought to the vse of the Ministerie To reduce som of them whollie may bee done by restitution Impropriations may bee reduced to the ministery by fower meanes commutation redemption and contribution And first that I preiudice not the Lords spirituall and Church-men of their auncient priviledges from being placed in the first ranck reason is that they teaching the people not to possesse other mens goodes wrongfully we speake first of restitution to be made by them In declaration whereof wee thinke it not fitt in this place to shew to Porochiall Churches to what vse they were founded what end the state of the Cleargie was first founded into a state of prelacie by the King Earles Barons other great men because the same cometh afterward to be handled more at large but it shall suffice at this present for the purpose whereof we now intreate to lett the Reverend Bb. vnderstand that the small Parochiall churches were founded and endowed with glebe Landes tythes and other fruites by the Lordes of Manors This may bee proved by 15. R. 2. and 4. H. 4. c. 2. and is confessed by M. Bilson in his perpet gouerment Pag. 365. 366. to the end that the Lords tenantes within the same manors should be informed of the lawe of God and that Hospitalities might be kept and the poore of the same Parishes be relieved And besides the reverend Bishoppes we hope will graunt that the great Cathedrall and Collegiat Churches were not founded by the Kings progenitors Nobles and great men of the Realme to the ende that those great Churches as great hawkes pray vpoÌ„ litle fowles with their great steeples should care and devoure the litle steeples or that with their great Quiers they should overthrow iustle downe the small pulpittes And therefore we most humblie pray ayde froÌ„ the King for the casting of new clappes to be erected in the little pulpittes that be would be pleased to graunt restitâ—â—ones in integrum to all the litle churches and that all impropriations of all Parochiall churches and benefices nowe by spoliation parcell of the revenues of Archbb. Bishoppes Deanes Archdeacons Prebendaries and other ecclesiasticall persons restantes within those great churches may be whollie restored to their auncient and originall vse according to the mindes and intentes of the first Donours and Patrones of the same Parochiall and little Churches For if as Maister Bilson saith it be true that the Lords of Villadges having erected churches and allotted out portions for divine service eyther by Gods or mans lawe by their later graunts could not haue their former rights vnto their patronages overthrowen and if the allowance given at the first to the Ministers of ech Parish by the Lorde of the soyle were matter inough in the iudgement of Christes Church to establish the right of patrones that they alone should present Clerckes because they alone provided for them if I say this be true then haue the Ministers of those Villadges and of that soyle iust cause to require at the Diocâ—sans handes a râ—stitution of such allowances as were first given and provided for them by the patrones Especiallie the Diocesans by their own act nowe enioyning and converting the same allowances to their owne vse If it be answered that this can not well and convenientlie bee brought to passe because the same impropriations by the Archbishops Bishops and other Ecclesiasticall persons for divers summes of money are now lawfully demised to farme for many yeares yet to come herevnto we answere that these leases should hinder nothing at all the restitution of the right and interest in reversion or remainder of those impropriations Onlie if the impropriations haue bene made according to the lawes of the Realm the leases dulie graunted these leases for a time may hinder the incumbent Ministers from the present possession of the Tythes Fruits and glebe Land belonging to the same impropriations And yet may not the incumbent Ministers bee hindered in the meane while from receyving the reâ—tes reserved vpon such Leases and which by the same Leases are nowe payable to the Archbishops Bishops and other ecclesiaasticall persons Neither after the determination of the same Leases should the incumbent Ministers bee any more letted to enioy receyve the whole profits in right of their churches then other Ministers bee now letted to enioy theirs If any shall say that manie of these impropriations are annexed appropried as Prebendes for the provision of some of the Prebendaries of the same greate churches and that the same Prebendaries in the right of their prebeÌ„ds be the lawfull
Realm though that thorough sufferance and negligēce any thing should at any time be attempted to the cōtrarie For whereas before the statute of Caerlile the Bishoppe of Rome had vsurped the Seignories of such possessions and benefices as whereof the Kinges of the Realme Earles Barons and other Nobles as Lords and Avowes ought to haue the custodie presentements and collations King Edward the first by the assent of the Earles Barons and other Nobles of all the communaltie at their instancies and requestes and without mention of anie assent of the state of prelacie in the said Parleament holden at Caerlile ordeyned that the oppressions greevances and damage susteyned by the Bb. of Romes vsurpation should not from thenceforth be suffered in any manner And for as much as the greevances and mischieves mentioned in the said Act of Caerlill did afterward in the time of K. Edward the thirde daylie abound to greater damage and destruction of the 31. Ed. 5 sta of heering 36. Ed. 3. c. 8. Realme more then euer before and that by procurement of Clerkes purchasers of graces from Rome the sayde King Edward the third by assent accord of all the great men and cōmons of his Realme and without mention of any assent of Prelates or Lords spirituall having regarde to the saide Act of Caerlile and to the causes conteyned in the same to the honor of God and profit of the Church of England and of all this Realme ordeyned and established that the free elections of Archbishopps Bishoppes and all other dignities and benefices electiue in Englande should holde from thenceforth in the manner as they were graunted by the Kings progenitors and founded by the Ancestors of other Lords And in diuers other statutes made by King Ed. the third it is said that our Soveraigne Lord the King by the assent of the great men and all the cōmons hath ordeyned remedy c. That it was accorded by our Sovereigne Lord the King the great men and all the commons that the Kinge chieflie 8. Edw. 3. 〈◊〉 statute of Provisours desiring to susteyne his people in tranquillitie and peace and to governe according to the lawes vsages and franchises of his lande by the assent and expresse will and accord of the Dukes Earles Barons and the commons of his Realme and of all other whom these things touched ordeyned that all they c. By which desire of the Kinge and wordes of the Act wee learne that our Sovereigne Lord Kinge IAMES may susteyne his people in tranquillitie and peace and governe accordinge to the lawes vsages and frāchises of his kingdome though the assent and accord of Prelates bee never required to the enacting of anie statute in Parleament Nay such hath bene and yet is the power of The king with the assent of the Nobles and commons may repeale Statutes without cōsent of Prelates 15. Ed. 3. the King that with the assent and accord of the Nobles and commons hee hath authoritie to adnull and make voyde even those Actes which in favor of Prelacie and assent of Prelates haue bene enacted in Parleament As by an Acte made in the time of King Edwarde the third is plainlie to be seene For whereas the Kinge by assent of the Prelates Earles c. had willed and graunted for him and for his heyres certeyne articles firmelie to be kept and holden for ever namelie that the Ministers of holie Church for money taken for redemption of corporall penance nor for proofe accompt of Testaments nor for solemnitie of Mariage c. should not be impeched c. before the Kinges Iustices nevertheles the same Kinge in the same yeere with assent of the Earles Barons other wise men of the Realm and without assent of Prelates revoked and adnulled the same articles againe Againe King Richard the second hearing the complaints of his faithful liege 3 Ric. 2. cap. 3. people and by their clamour in diuers Parleamentes of divers abuses crept in against the solemne and devour ordinations of Churches c. at the request 7 Ric. 2. cap. 12. complaint of the Commons by the advise and common assent of the Lordes temporal without mētion of any Lords spirituall is said to haue ordeined That none of the Kinges liege people c. should take or receive within the Realm of England any procuracie c. And in the eleventh yeare of of the same same Kings reigne it is specially provided that the appeales pursuits c. made given in the same Parleament be approved affirmed stablished as a thing duly made for the weale and profit of the King and of all the Realme notwithstanding that Act Mo. Rich. 2. the Lords spirituall and their Procurators did by protestatiō absent them out of the Parleament at the time of the said iudgment given And the like protestation being made by the Prelats Clergie at a Parleament holden the thirde yeere of the same King it was replied for the King that neither for their said protestation or other words in that behalf The King bound by his oth to do his laws to be made though prelates protest against him the King would not stay to graunt to his Iustices in that case and all other cases as was vsed to be done in times past and as he was bound by vertue of his oath at his Coronation By all which premises it is as cleare as the sunne shining at noone day that the Lordes spiritual bee so far from making any one of the three Estates as that if it please the King they may not be so much as any member or part of any of the three Estates at all If in the time of King Henry the eight the Lords spirituall being then more in The Lords spiritual no principall members of the Parleament otherwise then as the King pleaseth number then the Lordes temporall had bene but such principal members of the high Estate of Parleament as without whō neither law could haue bin made Monasterie nor Priorie might haue ben dissolved what could the Kinge haue done as Head and the Commons haue done as feete and the Nobles haue done as the Heart the Liver and the Longes to the dislording and discloystering of the Abbots and Priours the Monkes and the Friers of those dayes In case the Prelates with their armes and with their shoulders with their handes and with their hornes had heaved and shouved had pushed and thrusted to the contrarie But to come nearer vnto our owne times and remembrances if it can not be proved that anie one Lord spirituall No Lordes spiritual present in parleament 1 Eliza. was present in Parleament or gaue anie assent to the enacting of statutes made in the first yere of the Queenes Maiesties raigne deceased but that it be a cleare case that the auncient iurisdiction preheminences rightes and priviledges of the Kinges Crowne were restored that poperie and superstition was banished the doctrine of the
their estates by pursuing the Patrones title at their owne charge Neither might the occasion of suite about the right of Patronage be any lett or hinderance that the Church in the meane time should be left as a Widow destitut of an husbaÌ„d For any one of the Clerkes nominated by either of the Patrones might be apointed by the Presbyterie to preach the word and publickly to pray vntill the controversie were ended And out of the fruites also of the same Church remayning in the custodie of one of the Patrones or sequestred by the Kinge to the vse of the next incumbeÌ„t he might haue such allowance as were requisite for the time of his continuance in that place And for the Sacraments if any were of necessitie to bee administred some other Minister neare adioyning might be provided to administer the same as in many places it hath bin and is now daylie vsed in like cases of vacancie That the Patrone should bee curbed with two hard a bridle as being barred The curbing of a patrone with to hard a bridle answered to fetch his Clerckes from any other place then froÌ„ the Vniversities or other Schooles and Nurseries of learning is a matter if it be well weighed of lesse importance then the Admonitor would insinuate the same to bee First it is not of necessitie required that all Patrones should at all times fetch all their Clerks from those places not froÌ„ else where For many times it may happen vpon iust cause for the benefite of the Church that a Clerke already ordained and placed in one Church may bee remoued from the same to another But only the meaning is according to the lawes and canons already setled that the greatest parte of the Patrones Clerckes must of necessitie bee called thence because they can not ells where bee had Now then whereas the law intendeth euery Church to be a wife and to haue an husbande to be a body and to haue an head the lawe as a parent vnto the Church hath provided vntill shee bee a widow in deed that no husband be provided for her And therefore by sundrie as well ancient Decrees as by Canons of Ex de prebend c. tuiâ— lib. 6. de prebeÌ„d si Episcopus Discipline made and published by the Bishoppes 1571 it is decreed and confirmed That the Bishoppe shall lay his handes on none or at anie other time but when it shall chaunce some place of ministratioÌ„ is voyd in the same Diocesse As for stipendarie Curates it is expresly against the policie of our Church that any should bee ordeyned a Minister to serue onlie as an hireling From which Decrees and Canons alreadie setled as I sayd before it followeth for the most part that the Patrones Clerkes to be ordained of necessitie must be called from the Vniversities or other places of learning For if every place of ministration be full and none must be made a Minister vntill some place be voyde then albeit some patrones vpon good causes to be allowed by publick discipline might be permitted to nominate some Clerkes alreadie placed in administrations Yet in the end as well the patrones of those Churches from whence these are to bee remoued as other patrones also manie benefices at one time beeing voyde must of necessitie seeke out men to bee ordeyned which never were ordeyned to the ministerie before And where are these to be sought if not onelie at the Vniversities or other Schooles Nurseries of learning For that prophetes in the ordinarie time of prophesying shuld be taken from the feete of the Apothecaries Taylors Drapers Milners Mercers Prophets in the ordinary time of prophesying to be taken out of the Scholes of Prophets or from the butry pantry kitchen celler or stable of any Bb. Peere Knight or Gentleman and not from the feete of the prophetes is a thing abhominable and odious vnto God and man Wherein theÌ„ doth this platforme in this point of fetching Ministers onely from the Vniversities or other places of learning differ from the intendement of lawes setled Or wherein can the patrones receyue any detriment by such a practise Nay they are so farr from receiuing anie The differeÌ„ce betwene the platform and the Bishopps practise preiudice hereby as indeed both they their Clerkes shall reape great commoditie by it Wherin I grant some discrepance to consist betweene the Bb practise and this platforme For the Bb. at one time allowe a Clerke for habilitie and at another time dissallowe the same Clerke for non habilitie And him whoÌ„ they haue ordeyned and adiudged to day worthie of an office they manie times disordayne him to morow and refuse him as a person vnworthie to possesse a benefice Whereas on the contrarie part we thinke it verie absurd vnreasonable to barre any man from a benefice whom the Governours of the Church shall iudge worthie to beare an office So that the Patrone by this platforme should be sure if at any time hee nominate a Clerke alreadie ordeyned that the same Clerke vnlesse it were for crime or some defect after happeninge should neuer be refused And if such be the lawes liberties of the Ordinaries what alteration of the law or preiudice to the Patrone could it be if by a newe law the King provided new meanes to put his old lawes in due execution If vpon difference of iudgement anie variance should arise betweene the Ministers Vpon differeÌ„ce of iudgment about the abilitie of a Clerke what may be done appointed to elect and ordeyne whiche of the Patrones Clerkes were most worthie the same diuersitie we assure our selues can breede no greater inconvenience nor further daunger then doth now daylie fall out in the election of schollers fellowes heades of Houses in the Vniversities or of other Officers in Colledges Cathedrall churches and bodyes politicke or corporate As those controversies therefore haue bene and are appeased by the good orders lawes of those places eveÌ„ so might these also And therfore some good law might be made to this effect viz. If any foure of the seven did agree togither vpon anie one Clerke nominated by the patrone that the same foure should strike the stroke and make the election good against the other three Neither doe we thinke it to stande with reason that the Archipresbyter or any other Minister among the seuen should necessarilie be of the quorum For if any one of the seuen should necessarilie be of the quorum theÌ„ having as it were a negatiue voyce against all the rest if he should bee wayward and apt to contention hee might then alwayes frustrat the election either by opposing him selfe to all the rest or by inclining to the lesser worser part as lately came to passe about the electioÌ„ of a Scholler among great Doctours If A Clerke refused for nonabilitiâ— to whom the nomination may devolâ—â—e both the Patrones Clerkes should bee disabled by those vnto whom the iudgment of their nonhabilitie
law these offices and functions haue bin and yet are dayly vndertaken and executed to the full And what maÌ„ then if there were none other rewarde for Civilians would tenne or twelue yeres togither beat his braine and trouble his witts in the studie of the civill lawe when every silly canonist might be able and learned inough to sit in the Bishops throne and to be iudge in his consistorie Besides if the Admonitor speake sooth viz that Civilians in this Realm liue not by the vse of the civill lawe to what end then should he feare an overthrow of the studie thereof For if there be no vse of it in this Realme for the maintenance of this life to what vse then should men studie the same in this Realme As for the vse of it among strangers and forraigne nations without the Realme the same as I suppose is no greater then such as 3. or 4. Civilians may bee able well inough fully to deliver the law touching all matters of controversie that may grow to question during the whole space of a Kinges raigne If no man lived in this Realme by the trade of brewing Beere but that all Brewers did live by the trade of brewing Ale what should we neede to feare the decaye of Beere-brewers or what vse were there of them In like sort if men liue onelie by the vse offices and functions of the canon law that men liue not as he saith by the vse of the civill law within the Realme what follie were it to studie the one whereas without the knowledge therof he might live by the other And therefore it seemeth that the Admonitor by his own weapon as much as in him lay hath given the whole studie of the civill law a most desperate and deadly wound And to the end we may vnderstand what reward maintenance Civilians by the offices functions of the canon law doe receyve yearely for their service and attendance in the Bishops and Archdeacons their Courts We will examine what fees Doctors of the civil law being Chancelors Commissaries or Officials haue vsually and ordinarily allowed vnto them by their Lords and Maisters Fees for probat of Testaments graunting of administrations Fees for probat of testaments let to farme with their appendances of late yeares in some places whether in all or how many I know not haue bin demised vnto farm for an annual rent out of which either a small or no portion at all hath bin allowed vnto the Chancelor or Official for his service in this behalf Wherevpon as I coniecture it hath fallen out rather then that those Officers would worke keepe courts travaile for litle or nought there have bin exacted greater fees for the dispatch of these things then by law ought to haue bin paied Perquisits of courts arising vpon suits commenced betwene partie and partie it must bee a plentifull harvest and there must be multi amici curiae in a Bb. consistorie if ordinarily communibus annis they amouÌ„r in the whole to twentie pounds by the yeare and yet these perquisits belong not wholy to the Chancelor but are to be devided betweene him the Register And touching Fees for excommunication and absolution fees for institutioÌ„ induction licences to preach licences for Curates and Readers For testimoniall of subscription or licences to marrie without banes fees for coÌ„mutation of penance fees for relaxation of sequestrations touching these manner of Fees if the same be fees no way warantable howe are not then such Fees every way dishonorable for a Doctor of the civill lawe Fees due for the executioÌ„ of the functions of the canon lavve dishonorable for a Doctor of the civil lavv to take either of Ministers or people There must bee therefore some other hope of better reward maintenance to incite and incourage schollers to the studie of the civill law theÌ„ are these beggerlie and vnlawfull fees depending vpon the functions and exacted by the officers of the canon law or ells the vse of the civil law as the Admonitor saith must necessarilie in short time be overthrovven For if Fees for probat of Testaments and granting of administrations with their appendices shall still be let to farme and if also many vnlawfull Fees were quite inhibited there would remaine I trowe but a very poore pittance for Civilians out of the functions of the canon law to maintaine their Doctoralities withall But what better reward can there bee for Civilians then hath already bin mentioned If the Admonitor had not willingly put a hoodwincke Civilians 〈◊〉 EnglaÌ„d liue not only by the functioÌ„s of canoÌ„ lavv before his eyes hee might haue seene that the civilians liue not wholy altogether by the practise of the canon law but partly also and that most honorably by the vse of the civill lawe If a Doctor of the civill lawe bee Iudge or Advocate in the Court of Admiraltie if he be Iudge or Advocate in the prerogatiue Court so farre as the same Court handleth onely matters of Legacies Testaments and Codicills to what vse can the canoÌ„ law serue him or what advantage can the same lawe bring him in Besides to what vse serveth the canon law vnto a Doctor of the civill law if he shall finde favor in the Kings sight if it please the King to make him one of the Maisters of his Requestes or one of the twelue Maisters of his high Court of Chancerie or to be the Maister of his Roles or to be his Highnes Embassador vnto forreyne Nations of to be one of his H. most honorable privie Councel or to be one of his principall Secretaries It followeth not therefore as the Admo pretendeth that eyther the Civilians in this Realme live not by the vse of the civill law but by the offices functions of the canon lawe and such things as are within the compasse therof or that the hope of rewarde and by that meanes the whole studie of the civill law must be taken away if once the canon law should be abolished Neither would it bee any hard matter for the King if the Civilians might finde gracâ— in his sight to appoint Courtes offices and all maner of processe and proceedings in iudgement for Doctors of the civill law to heare determine in the Kings name all causes being now within the compasse of any civill or ecclesiasticall law within this Realme And although a litle candle can giue but a litle light and a small Spring can sendâ—â— forth but a small streame yet because great fiers are kindled sometimes by 〈◊〉 tle sparkles and smal streames 〈◊〉 togither may in tyme growe into great rivers I shall desire the great Civilians with their floods lamps of learning to helpe forward such a law as whereâ—â— the studie of the civill law may bee vpholden the reward and maintenance of Civilians without any function froÌ„ the Canon law may be enlarged many coÌ„troversies and disorders in the church may be pacified and
the Kings prerogative Royall be duely advanced Which things if it might please them rightly to consider then let them humblie and seriouslie beseech our Sovereine Lord the King and States in Parleament to giue their consentes to such a law as the proiect ensuing may warrant thē the same not to be dangerous to the overthrowe of their civill studies The Proiect of an Act for the explanation and amplifying of one branch of a statute made in the first yeere of the raigne of Queene Elizabeth entituled An Act restoringe to the Crowne the ancient iurisdiction over the state Ecclesiasticall and also for the declaring and reviving of a statute made in the first yere of King Edward the sixt entituled An Act what seales and stiles Bishops and other spiritual persons exercising iurisdiction ecclesiasticall shall vse FOr asmuch as by one braunch of an Act made in the first yeere of our late Soveraigne Ladie of blessed memorie Queene Elizabeth entituled an Act restoring to the Crowne the auncient iurisdiction over the state Ecclesiastical Spirituall and abolishing all forraigne power repugnant to the same it was established and enacted That such iurisdictions priviledges superiorities and preheminences spiritual and ecclesiasticall as by anie spirituall or ecclesiasticall power or authoritie hath heeretofore bin or may lawfully be exercised or vsed for the visitation of the Ecclesiasticall state and persons and for reformation order correction of the same and of all maner errors heresies schismes abuses offences contempts and enormities should for euer by authoritie of that present Parleament be vnited and annexed to the Imperiall Crowne of this Realme by meanes whereof it may now be made a questiō whether any Archbishops or other Ecclesiasticall persons having since that time vsed or exercised any such spirituall or ecclesiasticall iurisdiction in their owne right or names might lawfully haue done or hereafter may lawfully doe the same without speciall warrant and authoritie derived immediatly frō your Highnes by and vnder your H. letters patents And whereas also by a statute made in the first yeare of Kinge Edward the sixt entituled an act what seales and stile Bishops or other spirituall persons shall vse it was ordained that all and singular Archbishops and Bishops others exercising ecclesiastical iurisdictiō should in their processe vse the Kings name and stile and not their owne and also that their Seales should bee graved with the Kings armes And forasmuch also as it must bee highly derogatorie to the Imperiall Crowne of this your Highnesse Realme that any cause whatsoever ecclesiasticall or temporall within these your H. Dominions should be heard or adiudged without warrant or commission from your Highnes your heyres successors or not in the name stile and dignitie of your Highnes your heyres and successors or that anie seales should be annexed to anie promesse but onelie your Kinglie seale and armes May it therefore please the King at the humble supplication of his Commons to haue it enacted That the aforesaid branch of the aforesaid Act made in the first yeere of Queene Elizabeth her raigne everie part thereof may still remayne for ever be in force And to the end the true intent and meaning of the said statute made in the first yeere of King Edward the sixt may be declared and revived that likewise by the authoritie aforesaid it may be ordayned and enacted that all and singular Ecclesiastical Courts and Consistories belonging to any Archb. Bb. Suffraganes Colege Deane and Chapiter Prebendarie or to any Ecclesiasticall person or persons whatsoever and which haue heretofore bin commonly called reputed taken or knowne to bee Courts or Consistories for causes of instance or wherein any suite complaint or action betwene partie and partie for any matter or cause wherin iudgment of law civil or canon hath bin or is required shall and may for ever hereafter be reputed taken and adiudged to be Courts and iudgmentseats meerely civill secular and temporall and not hence foorth Ecclesiasticall or spirituall and as of right belonging and apperteyning to the Royall Crowne and dignitie of our Soveraigne Lorde Kinge Iames that nowe is his heyres and successors for ever And that all causes of instance and controversies betwene partie partie at this day determinable in any of the said Courts heretofore taken and reputed ecclesiasticall shall for ever hereafter bee taken reputed and adiudged to be causes meerely civill secular and temporall as in trueth they ought to be and of right are belonging and appertayning to the iurisdiction of the Imperiall Crowne of this Realme And further that your H. liege people may be the better kept in awe by some authorised to be your H. Officers Ministers to execute iustice in your Highnes name and vnder your H. stile and title of King of England Scotlād Frāce and Ireland defendor of the faith c. in the said Courtes and Constories and in the said causes and controversies Bee it therefore enacted by the authoritie aforesaid That all the right title and interest of in and to the said Courts and Consistories and in and to the causes controversies aforesaide by any power iurisdiction or authoritie heretofore reputed Ecclesiasticall but by this Act adiudged civill secular and temporall shall for ever hereafter actually and reallie be invested and appropried in and to the Royall person of our Soveraigne Lord the King that now is his heyres successors Kinges and Queenes of this Realme And that it shall and may bee lawfull to and for our saide Soveraigne Lord and King his heyres and successors in all and everie Shire and Shires Diocesse and Diocesses within his H. Dominions and Countries by his and their letters patents vnder the great Seale of England from tyme to tyme and at all tymes to nominat and appoint one or moe able and sufficient Doctor or Doctors learned in the civill law to be his and their civil secular and temporal Officer and Officers Minister and Ministers of Iustice in the same civill secular and temporall Courts Consistories which in and ouer his and their royall name stile and dignitie shall as Iudge and Iudges doe perform execute all and every such act and acts thing and things whatsoeuer in and about the execution of iustice and equitie in those Courts according to the course and order of the civill lawe or the Ecclesiasticall canons and constitutions of the Realme as heretofore hath bin vsed and accustomed to bee done by for or in the name of any Archbb. Bb College Cathedral Church Deane Archdeacon Prebendary or any other Ecclesiasticall person or persons whatsoeuer And that all and every such civill secular and temporall Officer and Officers Minister and Ministers Iudge Iudges in his and their processe shall vse one manner of Seale only and none other hauing graued decently therein your Kingly armes with certaine characters for the knowledge of the Diocesse or Shire And further bee it enacted c That it shall and may be lawfull by
the authoritie aforesaide for our said Soveraigne L. the King his heyres and succerssors from tyme to tyme and at all tymes to nominat and appoint by his and their Highnes letters patents vndee the great Seale of England for euerie Shire and Shires Diocesse and Diocesses within his or their H. Dominions one or moe able sufficient persons learned in the civill lawe to be his and their Notarie and Notaries Register and Registers by him them selues or by his or their lawfull Deputie or Deputies to doe performe and execute all and euery such act acts thing and things as heretofore in the Courts and Consistories Ecclesiasticall aforesaid hath bin and now are incident and apperteyning to the office of any Register or Notarie And further at the humble suite of the Commons c. it may please the King to haue it enacted That all singular matters of Wills Testaments with all and everie their appendices that all and singular matters of Spousalls Mariages with their accessories that all and singular matters of diffamation heereto fore determinable in the ecclesiasticall Courtes and if there be anie other causes of the like meere civill nature shall be heard examined and determined by the said civill and secular Officers and Iudges in the said civil and secular Courtes according to the due course of the civil law or statutes of the Realme in that behalfe provided And that all matters of Tythes Dilapidations repayre of churches and if there be anie other of like nature with their accessories and appendices shal be heard examined and determined by the saido civill and secular Officers and Iudges in the said civil and secular Courtes according to the Kings ecclesiasticall lawes statutes and customes of the Realme in that behalfe heeretofore vsed or heereafter by the King and Parleament to be established And at the humble suite of the Commons may it please the King to haue it further enacted That all maner of fees heeretofore lawfull or heereafter by the King and Parleament to bee made lawfull for or concerning the probat of Willes administration of the goods of the intestat letters of tuition receyving or making of accompts inductions to Archbishoprickes Bishoprickes Dearries Parochiall-churches or other spirituall promotions and all other feees what soeuer heretofore lawfull or hereafter to be made lawful for anie travaile or paine to be taken in or about the expedition and execution of any of these causes shall for ever hereafter be fees allowances appropriated to the Iudges and principall Registers of the sayde Courtes equally to be devided betwene them as heeretofore hath bin accustomed and that the said Iudges and Ministers within their severall charges shal be Collectors of the Kings tenthes and subsidies graunted and due by the Clergie taking for their travayle and payne in and about the same collection such fees as heretofore haue bin accustomed Provided alwayes that none of the saide civill and temporall Officers and Ministers nor any of them for any offence contempt or abuse to be committed by any person or persons in any wise incident to any of the said Courts and Consistories suspend excommunicate or interdict any person or persons but shall and lawfully may by authoritie of this present Act proceed against everie offendor and offendors by such ordinarie processe out of the said Register or Notaries office as is vsed vpon a sub-pae-na out of the high Court of Chancerie and there vpon default or contempt to proceed to attachment proclamatiō of rebellion and in prisonment of the partie offending as in the said high Court of Chācerie is vsed Provided also that all appeales hereafter to be made from all and every Court and Courts in the Shyres and Diocesses of the Countrey shal be made to the higher Courtes as heretofore hath bin accustomed onely with an alteration and addition of the names stiles and dignities of Archb. Bb. and other Ordinaries vnto the name stile and dignitie of our Soveraign Lord the King his heyres and successors And that vpon the appeales so to be made it shall and may be lawfull for the Iudges Ministers of Iustice of and in the said higher Courts to make out all maner of processe and processes and to doe execute all and every act and acts thing things for the furtherance of Iustice in the causes afore said as to them shall by the law seeme equall right meete convenient any law statute privilege dispensation prescriptiō vse or customs heretofore to the contrarie in any wise notwithstanding Provided also that all and every such Iudge and Minister that shall execute any thing by vertue of this act shal from time to time obey the Kings write writs of prohibition of attachment vpon prohibition and indicavit and not to proceede contrarie to the tenour of such write or writes in such and the same maner and forme and condition as they have or ought to haue done before the making of this act any thing in this act to the contrary notwithstanding Provided also that this acte or any thing therein conteigned shal not extend or be interpreted to give any authoritie to the said Iudges Ossicers or any of them to put in execution any civill or Ecclesiasticall lawe repugnant or contrariant to the lawes statutes or customes of the Realm or hurtfull to the Kings prerogatiue Royall And thus it may seeme to bee but a small labour a litle cost and an easie matter for the Kinge his Nobles and Wise men of the Realm to devise formes of iudgement and maner of processe proceedings without any offices or functions of the canon law wherby the vse and studie of the civill lawe and the rewarde and maintenance for Civilians might be furthered and increased and not vtterly overthrowne taken away as the Admonitor vncivily beareth vs in hand As for the alteration of the censure of excommunication for contumacie mētioned in this proiect we haue the consent of the reverende Bishops in Pag. 138. this admonition that the same may bee altered For the Admonitor their Prolocutor speaketh on this wise Viz. As for Excommunication for contumacie by the Admonitors iudgement may be takē away without offence and with the good liking of the Bishops the excommunication practised in our ecclesiasticall Courts for contumacie in not appearing or not satisfying the iudgement of the Courte if it had pleased the Prince c. to have altered the same at the beginning and set some other order of processe in place thereof I am perswaded saith he that the Bishops Clergie of the Realme would haue bin very well contented therewith And speakinge of a certaine maner of civill discomoning vsed in the Church of Tigure he further addeth viz. Which or the like good order devised by some godlie persons if it might be by authoritie placed in this Church c I think it would be gladlie receaved to shun the offence that is taken at the other Admonition And matters
if it may please him so to provide by Parleament may giue remedie vnto complaynants by writts out of the Chancerie and that complaints in such cases may effectuallie be redressed vpon such writts in the Kings Courts And if also sundrie matters of Tythes Testaments and Mariages be alreadie handled in the Kinges Courts if these things I say be so and so may be then with litle reason did the Admonitor warne vs that a verie great alteration of the common law must follow and that it will be no small matter to applie these things to the temporall law But the antecedent is true as hath bene alreadie shewed Therefore the consequent is true Admonition Iudgementes also of adulterie slauÌ„der c. are in these mens iudgmentes Pag. 78. mere temporall and therefore to be dealt in by the temporall Magistrate onely Assertion We are in deed of this iudgemeÌ„t that in regard of the Kinges Royall Office these iudgements of adultrie and other criminall causes comprised within this clause c. ought no more to be exempted from the Kings temporall Courtes then matters of theft murther treason and such like ought to be And for the mayntenance of our iudgementes wee affirme that there is no crime or offeÌ„ce of what nature or qualitie soever respecting any commaundement conteyned within either of the two tables of the holie law of God if the same bee nowe corrigible by spirituall power but that some fault and contempt one or other of the like nature and qualitie as comprised vnder the same commandement hath bene evermore and is now punishable by the Kings Regall and temporal iurisdiction For adulterie as the same is to be censured by penance in the Ecclesiasticall Courtes so is ravishment also buggerie sodomie to be punished in the Kings Court by payne of death And as hath bene accustomed that Ordinaries by ceÌ„sures of the Church may correct fornicators so fornication also as in some bookes written of the common lawe is reported hath bene in times passed presented and punished in leetes and Law-dayes in divers places of the Realme by the name of Letherwhyte whiche is as the booke saieth an auncient Saxon terme And the Lord of the Leete where it hath bene presented hath euer had a fyne for the same offence By the statute of those that be borne beyond the Seas 25. Ed 3. it appeareth that the Kinge hath cognizance of fome bastardie And nowe in most cases of bastardie if not in all by the statute of Eliza. the reputed father of a bastard borne is lyable to bee punished at the discretion of the Iustices of peace Touching periurie if a man loose his action by a false verdict in plea of land Periurie if punishable temporallie in some cases why not in all he shall haue an attaynt in the Kinges Court to punish the periurie and to reforme the falsitie And by divers statutes it appeareth that the Kings teÌ„porall Officers may punish periurie committed in the Kings teÌ„poral Courtes And though it be true that such periurie as hath risen vpon causes reputed spirituall haue bene in times past punished onlie by ecclesiasticall power and censures of the Church yet herevpon it followeth not that the periurie it selfe is a meere spirituall and not a temporall crime or matter or that the same might not to be civillie punished By a statute of Westminster 25. Ed. 3. it was accorded that the King his Vsurie heyres shall have the cognizance of the vsurers dead and that the Ordinaries haue cognizance of vsurers on lyfe to make compulsion by censures of the Church for sinne and to make restitution of the vsuries taken against the lawes of holy church And by another statute it is provided that vsuries shall 20. H. 3. c. 5. not turne against any being within age after the time of the death of his Auncestoure vntill his full age But the vsurie with the principall debt which was before the death of his Auncestor did remayne and turne against the heyre And because all vsurie being forbidden by the law of God is sinne detestable 13. Eliz. c. 8. it was enacted that all vsurie lone and forbearing of money c. giving dayes c. shall be punished according to the forme of that Act. And that everie such offendor shal also be punished corrected according to the Eccle. lawes before that tyme made against vsurie By al which statutes it seemeth that the cognizance reformatioÌ„ of vsurie by the lawes of the Realm partayneth onlie to the Kinge vnles the King by his lawe permit the Church to correct the same by the censures of the church as a sinne committed against the holy law of God Touching heresies and schismes albeit the Bishoppes by their Episcopall Heresies schismes are punishable by the Kings lawes and ordinarie spirituall power grouÌ„ded vpon canon lawe or an evill custome have vsed by definitive senteÌ„ce pronouÌ„ced in their Consistories to condemne men for heretickes and schismatickes and afterward being condemned to deliver them to the seculer power to suffer the paynes of death as though the King being custos vtriusque tabulae had not power by his Kinglie office to enquire of heresie to condemne an hereticke to put him to death vnlesse he were first condemned delivered into his hands by their spirituall power although this hath bene I say the vse in England yet by the statutes of Richard the second Henrie the fift it was lawfull for the Kings Iudges and Iustices to enquire of heresies and Lollardes in Leetes Sherifes turnes and in Lawdayes and also in Sessions of the peace Yea the King by the common law of the Realme revived 25. H. 5. c. 14. by an Act of Parleament which before by the Statute of Henrie the fourth was altered may pardon a man condemned for heresie yea and if it should come to passe that any heresies or schismes should arise in the Church of Englande the Kinge by the lawes of the Realme and by his Supreame Soveraigne power with his Parleament may correct redresse and reforme all such defaultes and enormities Yea further the King and his Parleament with consent of the Cleargie in their Convocation 1. Eliz. ca. 〈◊〉 hath power to determine what is heresie and what is not heresie If then it might please the King to haue it enacted by Parleament that they which opiniativelie and obstinatelie hold defende 1 Eliz 〈◊〉 1. and publish any opinions which according to an Act of Parleament alreadie made haue bene or may bee ordered or adiudged to be heresies should be heretickes and felons and their heresies If it please the Kinge heretickes may bee adiudged felons and hereâ—ies felonies to be felonies and that the same heretickes and felons for the same their heresies and felonies beeing araigned convicted and adiudged by the course of the common law as other felons are should for the same their heresies felonies suffer the paynes of death
there is no doubt but the King by vertue of his Soveraigne and Regal Lawes might powerfullie ynough reforme heresies without anie such ceremoniall forme papall observance or superstitious solemnitie as by the order of the canon lawe pretendeth to bee still in force hath bene accustomed And as these offences before mencioned be punishable partlie by temporall and partlie by ecclesiasticall authoritie so drunkennes absence from divine service and prayer fighting quareling and brawling in church and church yeard diffamatorie wordes and libels violent laying on of hands vpon a Clarke c. may not onlie be handled and punished in a Court ecclesiasticall but they may also be handled punished by the King in his temporall Courts By all which it is evident that the Clergie hath had the correctioÌ„ of these crimes rather by a custome by sufferance of Princes theÌ„ for that they be meere spiritual or that they had authoritie by the immediate law of God And if all these as well as some of these crimes by sufferance of Princes The cognizance of all crimes as well as of some crimes by the lawe of God belong to the King and by a custome may be handled punished spirituallie then also if it please the King may all these as well as some of these crimes without a custome bee handled and punished temporallie For by custome and sufferance onlie some of these crimes be exempted from the cognizance of the King and therefore by the immediate law of God the cognizance as well of all as of some of these crimes properlie apperteineth vnto the King And then the iudgment of those men who defend iudgements of adulterie slaunder c. to be more temporall and by the temporall Magistrate onelie to be dealt in seemeth every way to bee a sincere and sound iudgement Howbeit they doe not hereby intend that the partie offending in any of these things by the Kings law punishable should therefore wholly be exempted freed from all censures of the Church Nay we iudge it most requisite and necessarie No offendor freed froÌ„ the censures of the Church for the bringing the partie which offendeth to repentance and amendement of life if presentlie vpon sentence of death he be not executed that besides his temporall punishement the censures of the Church according to the qualitie of the offence may bee vsed and executed against against him yea and we thinke that the Kinge by the holie law of God is bound by his regal power to command the church dulie rightlie to vse the same censures not onelie against everie adulterer defamer vsurer c. but also against everie thiefe everie manslayer everie traytor and every other offendor For not onlie sinnes reputed with vs ecclesiastical but al sinnes of what kind soever ought to be repented of coÌ„sequentlie against all sinnes the ecclesiasticall censures ought to bee vsed And by whom should the same be exercised but by the church Why then belike where an offendour is punished in the Kings Court hee shall againe bee punished in the Ecclesiasticall Court and so for one offence be twise punished which were vnreasonable To this wee answere that it is not against reason that one man for one For a maÌ„ to be punished twise for one fault in two respects is not vnreasonable fault should bee punished both temporallie and spirituallie First he consisteth of two parts viz. of a bodie and of a soule in both which parts he hath offended Secondlie he hath offended aginst two lawes the law of God and the law of the King For the execution of which two lawes there be two kindes of officers of two severall natures the King for the one lawe and the Officers of the Church for the other law both these kindes of officers haue power given them immediatlie from God to execute the one Kinglie and temporal the other Pastorall spirituall power And therefore we say it staÌ„deth with great reason that the soule causing the body to sinne should no more escape that punishmeÌ„t which is appointed for the soule by the law of God then the body should escape that punishment which is appointed for the bodie by the law of the King why then the Officers of the Church may medle with matters apperteyning to the Kinges law what an indignitie to the King were that To this we answere that the Officers of the church in a severall respect and to a severall end dealing in one and the selfe same matter wherein the King dealeth may no more be charged with dealing in matters apperteyning to the Crowne by the exercise of their spirituall sword then can the King be charged with medling in the same matters to medle with matters perteining to the soule by the exercise of his temporall sworde So that the spirituall power of the officers of our Saviour Christ which consisteth onelie in binding and loosing of the soules of men can not possiblie by any reason or good â—ntendement bee construed now to be any more preiudiciall to the Kings prerogative or contrariant to the lawes of the Realme then it hath bin heretofore Because vsurie incontinencie divers other crimes ecclesiasticall haue not bin punished only by ecclesiastical correction but also by teÌ„porall peyne And therfore to take away this frivolous obiection we instantlie pray that the lawes of the Realm may still keepe their due and ordinarie course and that the Kinges Scepter may reteyne that ancient and Royall estimatioÌ„ which belongeth vnto it and that it may be ordered by an irrevocable law as followeth Potestas iurisdictio actionum quarumcunque civilium punitio castigatio externa omnium maleficiorum quorumcunque famam facultates seu personas tangentium non penes Pastores Seniores Ecclesiae sed penes vnum solumque Principem civilem Magistratum sunto quicunque ijs non acquieverunt capitali poena punivnto Whervpon also falleth to the ground that cavillous and odious slaunder following in the Admonition viz. that the lawes mainteyning the Queenes Supremacie in governing of the church and her prerogatiue in matters ecclesiastical as well elections as others must be also abrogated The contrarie whereof being avouched throughout this whole Assertion it shall be needlesse to spend any time in the refutation of so grosse an vntrueth Admonition Those lawes likewise must be taken Pag. 79. away whereby impropriations and patronages stand as mens lawfull possession and heritage Assertion By a statute 15 R. 2. c. 6. because divers damages and diseases oftentimes had happened and daylie did happen to the parochians of divers places by the appropriation of benefices of the same places it was agreed and assented that in everie licence from thence foorth to be made in the Chancerie of appropriation of any parish church it should be expreslie conteined comprised that the diocesan of the place vpon the appropriation of such churches should ordeine according to the value of such Churches a convenient summe of
perinde vares pluralities non residencies wherin not the people to be taught but their owne backes and bellies to bee clothed and fedde is wholy respected Now theÌ„ that this manner of goverment wherin the afore specified and the like discoÌ„modities daylie fall out vnder colour of not diminishing the Kings prerogatiue of not altering lawes setled of not attempting dangerous innovations of the preserving of the right of Patrones Bb. and Archd. should still be continued without any mention or remembrance to be once had of their discontinuance especiallie in the time of peace vnder a Christian Magistrate and in a state as he sayeth reformed wee humbly leaue to the wise and mature deliberation of our most Christian King and State in Parleament And we most humbly beseech the King State that indifferentlie freelie and largelie it may be argued SupplicatioÌ„ to the Kinge and State in Parleament heard and examined whether it be possible that the tenth parte of these or anie other the like disorders corruptions grievances can possibly fall out in the church by that platforme of Discipline which is required to be planted And to the end that the Kings Maiestie and the State might rightlie and perfectlie bee Petition ordinatioÌ„ c. of Ministers or Pastours howe the same may be made without Bb. or ArchdeacoÌ„s not disagree able to divers lawes alreadie setled informed and resolved of those pointes whereof we now speake viz of the petition ordination election presentation and admittance of every Parochiall Pastour to any church with cure of soules how the same may stand and not be disagreeable to diuers lawes alreadie setled and in force it is requisite that the substance of these thinges in this place bee intreated of wherein against the base office meane person of the Archdeacon we oppose the Royall office most excellent person of the King against the immoderate office and stately person of one lordly Bishop we oppose the meeke and teÌ„perate cariage of a Senat or Presbyterie of many wise learned and grave Ministers togither with a Reverend assemblie of the Ancientes and chiefe Fathers of every Church destitute of a Pastour As for the Patrones right wee are so far from diminishing any iotte of the true right which by laws setled he ought to haue as that he shall quietlie possesse his interest and that with lesse trouble and expence yea and with greater priviledge then he did before Thus therefore touching the office and person of the King the duetie of the Presbiterie people the right of the Patron and the person of the Minister to bee ordeyned thus and thus we saye and thus and thus as we think may our sayings well stand with lawes setled By an Act primo Eliz. c. 1. the King hath ful power and authoritie by letters pateÌ„tes vnder the great seale of England when and as often as need shall require as he shall thinke meete and coÌ„venient and for such and so long time as shall please his H. to assigne name authorize such person or persons beeing naturall born subiectes as his Maiestie shal thinke meete to exercise vse occupie exequut vnder his H. all manner of iurisdictions privileges and preheminences in any wise touching or concerning any spirituall or ecclesiasticall iurisdiction within this Realme of Englande Agayne by the booke of ordeyning Bishoppes Priestes and Deacons it is prescribed that the Bishoppe with their The Bb. Priests must lay on their hands Priestes shall laye their handes severally vpon the heads of everie one that receaveth Orders that every one to be made a Minister must be of vertuous conversation and without crime sufficientlie instructed in the holy Scriptures a man meete to exercise his ministerie duelie that he must be called tried and examined that he must bee presented by the Archd. and be made openly in the face of the Church with prayer to God and exhortation to the people And in a statute made 21. of King H. 8 it is affirmed That a Bishoppe must haue sixe The Bishops must vse six Chapleines at giuing of orders Chapleines at giving of orders Besides by an ancient and lowable custome the Parishes and Parish Churches within every Archdeaconrie remayne vnto this daye distributed into certaine Deanries Every Archdeacon devided into Deanries amoÌ„g the Ministers of which Deanries the Parson or Vicar of the auncientest Church commonly called the Mother Church of the Deanrie vnles by consent some other be chosen by the Ministers them selues hath the first place and is the chief director and moderator of whatsoever things are propounded in their Synodall meeting which Minister also is called Archipresbiter or Decanus curalis according to the appellation of the chief Minister of the mother or chiefe church of that Diocesse who is called Archipresbiter or Decanus cathedarlis so that vnto this day these Ministers meeting at the ArchdeacoÌ„s visitations once in a yeare at the least there remayneth in the Church of England a certaine image or shadowe of the true ancient Apostolicall conferences and meetings Wherefore from these lawes from this ancient maner of the meetinges of Ministers and of having one principal and chief moderator amongst them according to the Apostolicall practise and vsage of the primatiue church thus alreadie setled in the church of England wee humbly leave it to bee considered by the Kings Maiestie First whether it were not meete and convenient for his Highnes by his letters patentes vnder the great Seale of A Minister to be ordeined by the Bishops and a companie of Ministers at the Kings commandement England to assigne name authorize the Bishops six or moe Ministers within everie Deanerie continually resiant vpon their benefices and diligentlie teaching in their charge to vse and execute all maner of iurisdiction privilege and preheminence concerning any spirituall ordination election or institution of Ministers to bee placed in the Parochiall Churches or other places with cure of soules within Secondlie when any Parish Church or other place with cure of soules shal be voide whether it were not meete convenient that the auncientes and chiefe Fathers of that place within a time to be limited for that purpose should intimate the same vacancie vnto the office Vacancie of a benefice to be intimated to the kings office of the Kings civill Officer appointed for that Shire or Diocesse to the end the same Officer by authoritie froÌ„ the King might command in the Kings name the Bishop and other Ministers to elect and ordeine and the people of the same place to approve allow of some able and godlie person to succâ—ede in the Church Thirdly the Patrone if the same be A lay patrone insteed of varying his Clerck may present two Clerkes at one time a common and laie person having now libertie to vary his Clerk if he be found vnable whether it were not meete and convenient to avoid all maner of varying that within
the time prefixed hee should nominate at one time two Clerks to bee taken out of the Vniversities or other Schooles and Nurseries or of the Prophets that the same nomination be made vnto the Bishop and the said six Ministers to the ende that both the Clerkes being tried and examined by them the abler of the twoo might bee preferred to that charge And of this maner of presenting two Clerkes by the Patrone we haue a president not much vnlike in the statute for nomination of Suffraganes By which act every Archbishop and Bishop desiring to haue a Suffragane hath libertie to name and present vnto the Kinge two honest and discrete spirituall persons c. that the King may giue to one such of the saide two spirituall persons as shall please his Maiestie the tytle name stile and dignitie of a Suffragane Fourthly the Bb. and Presbiters hauing thus vpon triall and examination A minister found able for gifts is to be sent to the parish that his life may be examined and to haue the cōsent of the people founde one of the Patrones Clercks to be a fitt and able man to take vpon him the execution of the ministery in that Church whether it were not then meet convenient that by them hee should forthwith bee sent to the same Church aswell to acquaint the people with their iudgement and approbation of his gifts and abilitie to teach as also that for a time he should cōuerse abide amōgst them to the end his life manners and behauiour might bee seene into enquired after by their careful indeuours Fiftlie the people within a time to be perfixed not making and prouing before the Magistrate any iust exception against his life manners and conversations whether it were not then meete and conuenient that the Bishop with six other Ministers or moe of the same Deanrie authorized by the Kinge as aforesaid A man allowed for giftes and cōuersation is to bee ordeined with prayer fasting laying on of hands vnder some payne and within a certaine time should be bound in the presence of the Elders and people and in the same Church with fasting prayer and laying on of handes to ordeyne and dedicate him to the Ministerie and Pastorall charge of that Church Lastly these thinges being thus finished whether it were not then meete A Minister to be inducted into the Church by the Kinges writt convenient that the Bishoppes with the other Ministers and some of the chief of the people should giue the partie ordeyned a testimoniall vnder their handes or vnder some authenticall seale to certifie the Kings officer of the execution of his writt and that the Patron also should present the same person to the Kings officer humbly praying the same officer by authoritie to be derived from the King to cause him by some other writt to bee confirmed and really inducted into the possession of the same Church and into the mansion-house glebe-land and other profites Ecclesiasticall to the same apperteyning Oh! but this were a strange kinde of innovation and a dangerous attempt to To execute the premises no daungerous attēpt alter lawes setled especiallie in a setled estate of the Church Well well let my Lordes of the Clergie sing this song and pipe this melodie at their pleasure How be it for asmuch as this platforme in some parte thereof hath alreadie bene agreed vpon by divers Committees in Parleament in other some part thereof by lawes alreadie setled ought to haue bin practised and that in other some part thereof is an advancement of the Kings authoritie which last part also is lively pourtraicted out vnto vs by presidents from the Archbishop and Bishop them selues we shall through the grace of God and favour of the King be able well inough quite and cleane to wipe away all the spots of this calumniation And first touching the intimation and supplication to be made vnto the King Petition and intimatiō to the King agreable to laws setled that his H. would be pleased to cōmand every Minister to be presented by the patrone ordeyned by the Bb. Ministers and elected by the people and that the King being certified by them of the execution of his writt should vpon their testimoniall by another publike writt cause the Clerke ordeyned to be confirmed admitted and inducted to the real possession of the temporalities of the benefice This manner I say of intimation petition testimoniall admittance in substance and effect differeth but little from the forme of the petition nomination 25. H. 8. c. election investiture confirmation and consecration of the Arch-Bb and Bb. of this Realme For when soever the Church of Canterburie Winton or other Bishoppes sea becommeth destitute of a Pastor doth not the Deane and Chapiter of the same sea intimate vnto the King their want of a B. doth not the same Dean and Chapiter humbly supplicate his Maiesties favour and licence to elect an other And doth not the King vpon their supplicatiō by letters patents vnder his great Seale favourably grant their petition willing them vt talem eligant in Episcopum Pastorem qui Deo devotus Ecclesiae suae necessarius nobisque regno nostro vtilis fidelis existat And with the same letters patentes doth not the King sende a letter missiue conteyning the name and commendation of the person to bee elected After the election finished doth not the Deane and Chapiter intimat the same also vnto the King and humbly agayne pray the King to yeeld his Royall assent to the lord elected Wherevppon doth not the King againe direct his letters patentes of warrant to the Archb. or some other whō the King shall appoint to performe all things whiche accustomably are to bee done apperteyning to his confirmation and consecration according to the lawes and statutes of his Realme of England Lastly the consecration and cōfirmation being finished and the Bb. hauing done his homage sworne fealtie is not the Kings writt out of the Chancery directed to the Escheator to restore vnto him the temporalities of the same Bishopricke Yea and may not the Bishoppe also if it please him procure another writt out of the Chancery directed to his tenantes commaunding them to atturne and to take him for their Lord Now thē in this platform wherof mentiō hath bin made touching the placing of a parochiall Pastour any parochiall church with cure of soules being voyd when it is craved that the people of the same parish might intimate their want vnto the Kings officer and that the same officer might command the Patron to present the Ministers to ordeyn and the people according to the Kings lawes to assent vnto and approve the Clerk what other intent or meaning haue wee then that the King hath as ample and as lawfull The Kinge hath as large a power to command a Minister to be elected ordeined as a Bishop to be chosen consecrated a power to
together with their functions are arbitrable ceremonious rituall traditionall or circumstanciall yea and removeable at the pleasure of the King and State Neither doth this disagree from that A Bishopp Pastor and Elder and our Lorde B. diffu which was erst sayd of a Bb. or Pastor that they be all one in respect of their function For it is not sayd that an humane Bishop and Pastor but that a Bb. and Pastor are all one For a Bb. simplie so called is not a Bishopp and Pastor in respect of his fellowe brethren but only in regard of his flocke which he ouerseeth feedeth and ruleth But a humane what a lord Bishopp is Bishopp is hee that is promoted vnto this dignitie by man and who by mans authoritie taketh vpon him superoritie preheminence ouer them which are equall vnto him touching their function that intangleth himselfe with civill gouernment and wordlie affaires and whose Bishopplie office consisteth not so much in the dispensation of Gods worde and Sacraments as in Lordlie Bishoplie apparell Crossing with the signe of the crosse confirmation of children sole imposition of hands sole excommunication sole enioyning of articles vpō the people and Clergie of his Diocesse consecration of oratories delegation of his episcopall authoritie to his Suffragane Vicar generall and principall officiall and other such humane and Bishopplie functions All which are after the customes preceptes and traditions of men And albeit D. O. by vertue of the Queenes congedelier were chosen by the Deane and Chapter of Lichfield in episcopum Pastorem ecclesiae Lichfieldensis yet is hee never intituled The Lorde Bishoppe of Lichfield is neuer honored with the title of being Lorde Pastor with the dignitie of being the Lord Pastor but onely with the honor of being the Lord Bishop of Lichfield so that one and the self same person being a Bishop and a Pastor may be a Lord Bishop over Pastours but not a Pastor over Pastors Wherevpon it followeth that the Pastorall Pastoral authoritie of a Lord Bb of other Pastours is equall authoritie which hee hath in common with his brethren the other Pastors of his Diocesse is of no superioritie or proheminence aboue theirs and that touching the function both of his and their Pastorall cure charge there is a paritie betwene him and them by reason whereof he can haue no power over them because par in parem non habet imperium But why is it that he can not be called Pastor Pastorum ecclesiae Lichfieldensis Lord Pastor of the Pastors of the Church of Lichfield and yet may be called Dominus Episcopus Pastorum ecclesiae Lichfieldensis Lord Bishoppe of the Pastors of the Church of Lichfield Why but only for that there is custome tradition and the lawe of man for his episcopall iurisdiction and for that his pastorall function if hee haue any belongeth vnto him in common with his brethren the other Pastors iure divino The Bishoppe then having these two severall Whether a lord Bishop minister the doctrine sacrament and discipline of Christ by vertue of his lordlie episcopal or pastorall office and distinct offices imposed vpon his person the one by divine the other by humane lawe the one humane and episcopall the other without pompe pastorall there ariseth from thence this question by which of those two functions hee may lawfullie I meane according to Gods lawe minister the Doctrine Sacramēts censures of Christ If it be aunswered that it is lawfull for him by vertue of his Pastorall office to minister the doctrine and Sacramentes and by force of his humane Episcopall office to minister the censures of Christ then is not the answere fitted to the question the same being made â bene coniunctis ad male divisa For the censures of Christ as well as the doctrine of Christ being simplie of divine ordināce it must followe if his episcopall power be only of humane right pastoral power only of divine institution that the censures may be ministred by authoritie derived only from mā but the doctrine and sacraments by power derived onlie from God Which commixion of divine and humane right in the execution of the ordinances of God can no maner of wayes be sound pure and sincere and therefore also can not be pleasing vnto God For no more can the censures of Christ to the pleasure of God bee lawfullie administred by the authoritie of any one whose function is of man and not of God then could the sacrifice of God be offered by one who was a priest of man and not of God Now that humane episcopalitie or Bishoppisme in the Church of England is authorized and deduced from the power and law of Lordlie episcopalitie authorized onlie by the lawe of the Realme man viz. of the King Realme alone is evident as well by the donation endowment of the auncient Bishoprickes founded by the Kingly prerogatives of the Kings of this Realme as by the erection and establishment of the new Bishoprickes of Chester Gloucester Bristoll Peterborough and Oxford with their cathedrall Churches Seas Cities meeres and boundes of those humane Bishoppes for the exercise of their episcopall administration according to an act of Parleamēt authorizing the Kings Highnes to make Bishoppes by his letters patentes Nay further that humane episcopall iurisdiction within the meres Note that King Henry the eight by letters patents made Bb. therefore c. and boundes of every Diocesse within England is merelie of humane and not of divine iustitution appeareth by that power and authoritie which the Kinge hath in translating dissolving of Bishoprickes in conserving episcopall iurisdiction 31. H. 〈◊〉 c. 9 sometimes to such persons as be no Bishopps as did William the Cōquerour when he gaue Episcopall power to the Abbot of Battayle and lastlie by the verie maner and forme of the nomination licēce of election authoritie of investiture confirmation and consecration of Archbishoppes and Bishops established by the more positive lawe of the Realme But if it be aunswered that 25. H. 8. c. 20. the Bishoppe by his humane episcopall power doth minister the doctrine Sacraments and discipline of Christ then is the case worse with him then it was before because then not onlie the Discipline of Christ but also the doctrine Sacramentes of Christ should be ministred by that authoritie whiche is of humane institution Besides the answer should be vntrue because the Bishoppe at the time of his cōsecration doth not receyue anie authoritie to preache the worde and minister the Sacraments for that authoritie was then commited vnto him when first he was ordeyned to be a presbyter But the authorite which he receyueth at the time of his consecration is to correct and punish such as bee vnquiet disobedient and criminous within his Diocesse Whereby once againe is that confirmed which was erst said viz. That episcopall power in Englande is not of divine but of humane institution Especiallie for that
or condemned by forrein power or by forren lawes There shall no husbandrie no clothing no handicraft no mariner no marchaÌ„dize no lawes of the land no maner of good learning whatsoeuer in Schoole Colledge or Vniversitie bee decreased or laid aside Wherfore the Admonitor toying neuer so much how so euer he hath made his flourish cast about with his May bees his I feare his I pray God his yfes his andes howsoeuer I say it pleased him to trifle with these gew gawes yet shall none euer be able to proue by anie proofes dravvne from the holy Scripture or humane reason that anie hinderance in dignitie or incumbrance can euer betide our Nobles our Commons the state of our Countrey people lawes or common Weale if the state of church-gouermeÌ„t were translated from Archbishops Bishops Archdeacons Chancelours CoÌ„missaries and Officialls which are officers in the house of God onelie according to the commaundements and traditions of men vnto the gouernment practised by the Apostles and primitiue Church which they can not denie but must coÌ„fesse to haue bene according to the holy pleasure of God Nay our Nobles and our commons are most assured to be so farre from being endamaged or loosing ought hereby as herby they shall purchase that vnto them selues which neuer yet any oppugner of so good and holy a cause could attayne vnto Namely they shall seale vp vnto their owne soules infallible testimonies of good and sincere consciences testimonies I saye of their fidelities vnto God testimonies of their allegiance vnto him by whom they haue bene redeemed and testimonies of loue and compassion vnto the whole church of God Nay further our coÌ„mons shal be so farre from bringing anie damage vpon them selues as they shall marvelouslie benefit them selues First by purchasing vnto themselues a large immunitie from manie foule and great greeuances and exactions of money imposed leuied vpon them by officers and deputies of Archbishops Bishops Archdeacons c. Secondlie by hauing the Lord Christ whose cause they vndertake and whose glorie they advance to be a friend vnto their friends and an enemie vnto their enemies And if our Nobles and our Commons be all hushed if they be all at sleepe at peace and at rest we may cast away all feare and be past all doubt that the King can not but holily recreate and solace him selfe and that his gray haires when soeuer they shall come shall neuer be brought to the graue in sorrow but in a good perfect age and peace But happelie it may be replied that Pag. â—9 some of our Nobles and most of our commons be so backwardlie affected Pag. 79. to the trueth of Religion as that rather they would turne head vpon the Gospell then brooke an alteration of Archiepiscopall Episcopal and Archidiaconall Church gouerment In deed if a reformation of the state of the Cleargie were attempted by anie other meanes then by publicke tractation and coÌ„sent of ParleameÌ„t I could not but leane vnto this opinion that the attempting thereof might bring an overthrow to the attempters Because the same attempt should be dishonorable to the name of God as being contrarie to the forme of doctrine receiued But since thinges amisse are required to be redressed by the King and Parleament alone this obiection is altogether vaine and frivolous and is alreadie sufficientlie convinced by that peaceable agreement betweene Nobles and Commons before remembred But let vs wade a litle deeper and search a litle more narrowlie into euery vaine creeke and corner of this supposition And let vs see by what maner of persons this pretensed ouerthrow of the Gospell might be wrought All carnall sensuall and earthly men No feâ—re that prophane men will ouerthrow the Gospell either whose belly is their god or whose god is this world all such men I say as in euery age be of Domingoes religion namely iust iumpe of that religion which the King and State professe they are so farre from attempting ought to ouerthrow the Gospel as vnder the shadow of the name thereof they wil euermore croude and couer their carnalitie and prophanes For they being euermore of euery religion and so in deede of no religion and passing not whether our Sauiour Christ or Beliall be their God sing as the Poët singeth Ais Aio Negas Nego becke and bow cap and knee to whatsoeuer the state and lawe commandes If the King be a Gospeller the Gospell the Gospell and naught els but the Gospell shal be found to roule in their mouthes But let the Crowne once turne by and by they haue turned their coates and as wether cockes with euery puffe of wind are huffed about Whatsoeuer order or maner of gouerment be planted or displanted in the Church the same shal be no corosiue to them It shall neuer sticke in these mens stomackes neither will they lay it to their hearts The King and Counsell is wise inough and knowe what they haue to doe well inough They will not be more forward nor wiser theÌ„ the Prince they will not checke and controll the whole Realme They can not brooke these busie bodies and medlers in matters aboue their reach They wil be none of these new fangled and precise fooles they will not bee backward and come behinde the law as the Papistes doe neither will they be to forward and runne before the law as the Puritans doe But they wil behaue themselues in all things and at all seasons as discrete politike Protestants ought to doe coÌ„forming submitting themselues alwayes to all order authoritie of the Queenes booke lawes setled Yea and though they be not booke learned nor any pen clerkes yet they beleeue well And therefore they will goe to the Church and say a few prayers yea they will receaue the Sacrament at Easter as deuoutlie as the best precisian of them all All these Atheistes and godlesse men being neither hot nor cold neither fish nor flesh nor good red hering plant what plants you will and sow what seedes you list yea make what ditch hedge pale wall or fence you please they set cocke vpon hoope passe not a button for it euery season be it wet or be it dry euery kind of laÌ„d be it clay or be it sand euery furrow be it broad or be it narrow be it deepe or be it shallow pleaseth coÌ„tenteth these medley coates alike They are like vnto Iacobs â—wes which hauinge straked and party coloured rods laid before them in the gutters at a ramming time brought forth none other but partie coloured lambes And therfore they will neuer stir hand nor foote nor once steppe ouer a straw to worke any least anoyance to the Gospell It is good sleeping alwayes for these men in a whole skinne And not much vnlike to these partie coloured slepers are the admoniâ—orie protestants For they as the dutie of faithfull subiectes doe bind them liâ—ing in a state of a Church reformed and hauing libertie in
can any way be pregnant to proue the other And touching his assumption viz but the planting of the gouerment practised by the Apostles and primitiue Church will draw with it many great alterations of the state of gouerment of the lawes If in this place he vnderstood the state of Church gouerment and of the lawes Ecclesiasticall now in vse then is the proposition true And yet notwithstanding we avow the Gospell to be so farre from incurring any ouerthrow by such an alteration as thereby it is certayne that the same shal more more florish and be perpetuallie established by reason that this alteration should be made frō that which by long experience is knowne to be corrupt vnto that which is knowne by the holy Scriptures to be pure and sincere From a gouerment I say and lawes authorized by tradition and commandements of man alone to a policy lawes founded and descended by and from God him selfe But if the Admonitor by the assumption ment to enforme vs that the planting of the Apostolical gouerment will draw with it manie and great alterations of the temporall state of gouernment and of the temporall lawes statutes or customes of the kingdome then as before to his first so now also to his seconde I answere negatiuely and affirme that the The planting of the Apostolicall gouermēt will draw no alteratiō of the lawes of the realm with it planting of the said Apostolicall gouerment will not draw with it any least alteration of anie part of that temporall state of gouerment nor almost of anie one common statute or customarie law of the Land which may not rather bee altered thē reteyned For this platforme of gouerment we are able by the helpe of God to defend the same generallie for the most part to be most agreeable and correspondent to the nature qualitie disposition estate of our countrey people common weale and lawes as in our particular answeres to his particular reasons shall more at large appeare In all new and extraordinarie alterations it is not onely requisite to abolish al bad opinions out of the minds of those that know not the drift of the enterprisers but it is also necessarie that the defence of such alterations be made forcible against the opposition of all gaynesayers We will descend to the particulars ioyne issue with the Admonitor And vpon allegations exceptions witnesses and recordes to be made sworne examined and produced out of the holie Scriptures and lawes of the Land alreadie setled on the behalf of our cause before our Soveraigne Lord the King his Nobles and cōmons in Parleament we shall submit our selues and our cause to the Kings Royall and most Christian Iudgement In the meane time we 〈◊〉 that not onely the former clause of this admonitorie Bill but that al other clauses following in the same bill for the invaliditie insufficiencie indignitie and nullitie of them are to be throwne out and dismissed from the Kings Court especiallie for that the particulars opened by the Admonitor can not serue for any reasonable warning to induce the common people to relie themselues vpō his I am of opinion to the which wee plead at barr as followeth Admonition First saith he the whole State of Pag. 77. the Lawes of this Realme wil be altered For the Canon Law must be vtterlie taken away with all Offices to the same belonging which to supply with other lawes and functions without many inconveniences would bee verie hard the vse and studie of the civill law wil be vtterly overthrown Assertion When by a common acceptance and vse of speech these words whole state of the lawes of the Realme are vnderstood of the common and statute lawes of the Realme that is to say of the Kings temporall lawes and not of Canon or civill lawes it cannot followe that the whole state of the lawes of the Realme should Canon and civil laws no part of the laws of the Realme but only by sufferance be altered though the Canon and civill lawes with all Offices to the same belonging should be vtterly taken away be wholy overthrowne For no more could the Admonitor prove the canon or civill law at any time heretofore to haue bin any part of the lawes of this Realm otherwise then onlie by c 2. 25. H 8. C 21. in the preamble sufferance of our Kings acceptance long vse and custome of our people then can any man proue a parsly-bed a rosemary-twigge or an ivie-branch to be any part of the scite of the Castle of Farnham And therefore he might aswell haue concluded thus the whole scite of the Castle of Farnham wil bee transposed for the Boxetrees the heythorn arboures and the quicke set hedges planted within the Castle-garden must be removed cast away which were but a proof proouelesse and a reason reasonlesse If then by the abrogation of the canon or civill law scarce any one part of the lawes of this Realme should bee changed what reason haue we to thinke that the whole state of the lawes of the Realme must be altered Besides to conclude the whole by an argument drawen ab enumeratione partium and yet not to number the tenth part of such parts as were to bee numbred is I am sure neither good logike nor good law Moreover if all the canon-law I meane all the papall and forraigne canon law devised and ordeined at Rome or els where without the Realme and consequently all the Offices functions to the same belonging bee alreadie vtterlie taken away what hope of reward can Civilians expect from the vse of such things as are within the compasse of that law or of what efficacie is this argument to prove an alteration of anie part of the lawes of this Realme or that the studie of the Civill Law should be vtterly overthrowne For the whole state of the lawes properlie called the lawes of the Realme hath stood and continued many yeeres since the same Papal and canon law was abolished And as touching the Civilians for them to seeke after prefermentes by An imbasemēt for Civiliās to haue preferment by offices of the canon law offices and functions of the canon law is an embasement of their honorable profession especiallie since farre greater rewardes might verie easilie be provided for them if once they would put to their helping handes for the onely establishment and practise of the civil law in the principall causes now handled by them in the Courtes called Ecclesiasticall The canon law be abolished out of the Realme ought not to be vsed But how may it be proved that the Papall and forreign canon law is alreadie taken away and ought not to be vsed in England For my part I heartilie wish that some learned men in the common law would vouchsafe to shew vnto the King and Parleament their clere knowledge in this point In the meane season I shall not be negligent to gather set downe what in mine
vnderstanding the Statut-law hath determined therof By the statute of submission 25. H. 8. revived 1. Eliz. as the verie wordes and letter of the petition and submission of the Cleargie of the body of the lawe of the provisoes doe import the verie true meaning and intent of the King Parleament is evident and apparant to be thus as foloweth none other Viz. That such Canons Constitutions and Ordinances Synodall or Provinciall which before that time were devised ordeyned or which from thencefoorth should be devised or ordeyned by the Cleargie of the Realme being not contrariant or repugnant c. should onely and alonelie be authorised and to bee put in vre and execution And consequentlie that all canons constitutions and ordinances papal and made by forreign power without the Realme should wholy and vtterly be abrogated adnulled abolited and made of no value The words touching the petitioÌ„ submission meÌ„tioned in that statute in substance are these Where the Kings humble and obedient subiectes the Cleargie c. haue submitted them selues promised in verbo Sacerdotij that they will never from hence foorth presume to attempt alledge claime or put in vre No Canons provinciall or other to bee put in vre therfore no papal canoÌ„s in force anie canons constitutions ordinances provinciall or other or enact promulge or execute any newe canons c. And where also divers constitutions ordinaÌ„ces and canons Provinciall or Synodal which heretofore haue bin enacted and beethought not only to be much preiudiciall Canons provincial heretofore enacted beeing preiudiciall are to bee abrogated to the Kings prerogatiue Royall c the Cleargie hath most humbly besought the Kings Highnes that the said constitutions and canons may be committed to the examination and iudgement of his Highnes and of two and thirtie persons of his subiectes c and that such of the said canons and constitutions as shal be thought and determined by the said 32 persons or the more part of them worthie to be abrogated and adnulled shal be abolite and of no value and such other of the same constitutions and canons as by the said 32 persons c. shal be approved to stande with the lawes of God and consonant to the lawes of this Realme shall stande in their full strength and power c. These are the wordes of the Petition and Submission c. the letter of the bodie of the statute in effect is this Bee it therfore enacted c. That they nor anie of them from hence foorth shall presume to attempt alledge clayme or put in vre any constitutions or ordinaÌ„ces provinciall No coÌ„stitutions or ordinances Provinciall or other canons to be alledged therefore once they were all abolited or Synodall or any other canons And for as much as such canons constitutions c. as heeretofore haue bene made by the Cleargie of this Realme can not c. by reason of the shortnes c be it therefore enacted c that the Kings Highnes c shall haue power c that the said 32 persons c shall The Kinge and 32. persons have no power to examine papal canons therfore papall canons inteÌ„ded to bee wholy abolished haue power authoritie to view search and examine the said canons constitutions c Provinciall and Sinodall heretofore made and such of them as the Kings Highnes c. shall deeme and adiudge worthie to be coÌ„tinued and kept shal be from hence foorth kept c. and the residue of the said canons constitutions and ordinances provinciall which the Kings Highnes c shall neuer bee put in execution within this Realme These are the wordes of the bodie of the law the words of the Proviso are these Provided that such canons constitutions Canons provinciall alreadie made onely onauthorised by the proviso therefore no papall canâ—â— in force ordinances and Sinodals Provinciall being alreadie made which be not contrariant c shall now still bee vsed and executed as they were before the making of this Act till such time as they be viewed searched c by which words of the petition bodie of the statute and proviso three things seeme principally to be ment and intended First an vtter absolute abolition of all canons constitutions ordinances and synodals before that time made by the Clergie within the Realme or by any forrain power without the Realm whatsoever Secondlie a view search and examination of all canons constitutions and ordinances provinciall or synodall before that time made by the Clergie within the Realm And lastly because the Church should not vtterly be destitute of al canons c Provinciall or Sinodall a reestablishment or reauthorisement of all such of the said canons Provinciall or Synodall as were not onerous to the people contrariant or repugnant to the lawes statutes or customes of the Realme nor preiudiciall to the Kings prerogatiue Royall was agreed vpon till the saide Provinciall Canons c were viewed searched and examined All papall forreign canon law then before that time made without the Realme being once inhibited to be attempted alledged claymed or put in vre and by consequence adnihilated abolited made voide vnlesse the same be againe revived and reestablished remaine frustrate and adnulled still and therefore ought not to be attempted alleaged claymed or put in vre Besides it is plaine that forraigne papall canon law was never intended to be reauthorized because the same law was never coÌ„mitted to the view search and examination of the King and 32. persons The King therefore and 32 persons by vertue of this acte not having any authoritie to view search and examine any forreign canon law though hee and they had deemed and adiudged any part of the same law worthy to haue bene continued kept and obeyed yet nevertheles had not the same bene of any force or validitie For onelie such canons constitutions and ordinances Provinciall or Synodal being not coÌ„trariant onerous or preiâ—diciall to the King to the lawes or to the people were reestablished as were committed Besides whereas about twentie yeares passed divers canons coÌ„stitutions and ordinances aswell papall as provincial were alleaged by him that collected an Abstract against an vnlearned ministerie against dispensations for many benefices against excommunication and against civill iurisdiction in ecclesiasticall persons the aunswerer in the behalf and maintenance of those Tit. pag. 〈◊〉 2. The answerer vnto the Abstract proveth by his reasons the Pâ—pall canon lavve now vsed to be abolished abuses chalenged the Author for not hauing proved his intent by lawe in force affirming that the canons and lawes by him alleaged were but pretended necessarie and disused lawes that they were not inspired with the life of lawes that such were fathered for lawes as be not lawes and that it remayned by him to be discussed how many of them were to be called in trueth her Maiesties lawes The reason of all which his exceptions he yeeldeth to be this namely
that the Author ought to haue proved them not to haue ben repugnant to the customes of the Realme but to haue bin in vse and practise before the making of that acte of submission For hee must proue sayth the Answerer that they are not repugnant to the customes of this Realme and shew vs how they haue bin vsed and executed heere before the making of the statute yea he can say that they are by lawe established among vs. Which points saith he because we learn by law quod facta noÌ„ presumantur matters in fact are not intended to be done vntill they bee proued so we must still put him to his proofes in the meane time say that hee hath gaped wide to say nothing to the purpose and that in his whole booke he hath talked but not reasoned All which asseveration of this Answerer if the same be true and if this plea be a good avermeÌ„t to barre the Author from having proved a learned ministerie to be commanded by the lawe dispensations for many benefices to bee vnlawfull excommunication by one alone to bee forbidden and civill gouverment to be vnlawfull in ecclesiastical persons then much more forcibly may this argument be retorted vpon all such as clayme alleage put in vre any portion of the forraigne canon law For sithence it hath never yet bene proved that the forraigne canon lawe vsed and executed at this day was accustomed vsed 25. H. 8. then because wee learne by law as he saith quod facta non presumantur wee must still put him his clients to their proofe and in the meane while tell them that their Advocat hath twisted for them but a bad threed when by his reason he hath vntwined all their lawes and broken a sunder the bands of their gouverment Moreover because it is not yet proved that the forraigne and papall canon law is not contrariant nor repugnant to the lawes statutes or customes of the Realme nor derogatorie to the prerogatiues of the regall Crown nay because the contradictorie hereof is affirmed and this denied and because we learne by law as he saith that matters in fact are not intented to be done â—ill they be proved so wee must still put the vpholders and executioners of this law to their proofe and in the meane while tell them that the forraign papall law is but a pretended necessary disused law that it is not inspired with the life of law and that it is fathered by them to be such a law as is an hedlesse a fetherlesse and a nocklesse arrow which is not fit to be drawn or shot against any subiect of the King And from this voydance abolition nullitie of forraigne and papall canon law because sublato principali tolluntur accessoria it followeth that all offices and functions of papall Archbishops papall Bishops papall Suffraganes papall Archdeacons papall Deanes and Chapters papall Priestes papall Deacons papall Subdeacons papall Chancelors papall Vicars generall papall Commissaries and papall Officials meerely depending vpon the authoritie and drawen from the rules and grounds of that lawe are likewise adnihilated and of no value Howbeit forso By the opinion of the CiviliaÌ„s the papal canon law seemeth to bee in force much as by the opinioÌ„ of some learned Civilians there seemeth vnto them a necessarie coÌ„tinuance of the same forraign and papall law by reason that Archbb. and Bishops doe now lawfully Apologie of certain proceedings in courts Ecclesiasticall as they say vse ordinarie Archiepiscopall and Episcopall iurisdiction which they could not as they thinke doe if the same common lawe were vrterly abolished and for so much also as some learned in the canon lawes do mainteyne that since the statut of 1. Eliz. c. 1. the Archbb. and Bb. cannot lawfullie clayme anie ordinarie spirituall iurisdiction at all but that the spirituall iurisdiction to be exercised by them ought to be delegated vnto them froÌ„ the King by a commission vnder the great Seale Forasmuch I say as there are these differences of opinions it seemeth expedient to be considered by what law by what authoritie Archbb. and Bb. exercise Archiepiscopal Episcopall power in the church And to the end this question may fully be knowen and no scruple nor ambiguitie be left what power spirituall may be intended to be exercised by them We distinguish spirituall power into a power properly called spirituall and into a power improperlie Power properly and improperly called spirituall or abusivelie called spirituall The power properly called spirituall is that spirituall power which consisteth and is conversant in preaching the Woord administring the Sacraments ordeyning and deposing Ministers excommunicating or absolving and if there be anie other spirituall power of the like propertie and nature Now that this power properly called spirituall could haue bin drawen from the person of our late Soveraigne Ladie the Queene vnto Power properly called spirituall was neuer in the Queens person Archbb. and Bishops we denie For the Queenes Royall person being never capable of any parte of this spirituall power how could the same be derived from her person vnto them Nemo potest plus iuris in alium transforre quam ipse habet Archiepiscopall and Episcopall power therefore exercised in and about these mysteries of our holie Religion ordinarily necessarilie must belong vnto the Archbb. and Bb. by the canon of the holy Scriptures otherwise they haue no power properly called spirituall touching these things at all The power which improperlie is called spirituall Power improperly called spiritual is indeed but a temporall power is such a power as respecteth noâ— the exercise of any pastorall or ministeriall church to the internall begetting of faith or reforming of maners in the soule of man but is such a power as whereby publike peace equitie and iustice is preserved and mainteigned in externall things peculiarly appropried and apperteyning vnto the persons or affaires of the church which power indeede is properlie a temporall or civill power and is to be exercised onelie by the authoritie of temporall and civill Magistrates Now then to returne to the state of the point in question touching this later power improperly called spirituall by what law or by what authoritie the Archbishops and Bishops doe exercise this kind of power in the church I answer that they cannot haue the same from any forraign canon lawe because the same law with all the powers dependaÌ„ces thereof is adnulled And therefore that this their power must ought to be derived vnto theÌ„ from Bb. where From whence then is their power derived Herevnto we answere that before the making of that act spirituall iurisdiction did apperteyne vnto Bishops and that Bishops were ordinaries aswell by custome of the Realme canons constitutions and ordinances provinciall synodall as by forraign canon law And Bishops remaine ordinaries by custome provincial caÌ„oÌ„s and statute law though papal canon law be abolished that therefore these canons constitutions
they being all fast knit and bound togither vnto the Kings authoritie by a coard of 24 threads might easilie be broken but being severed and pluct a sunder into 24. Bishops can make no lawe without leaue And yet everie Bb doeth make many lawes 24 partes one from the other the King with all his regall power might not beâ— able so much as to breake one of the least threedes wherewithall one of their cordes was twisted If the Lorde Maior the Sheriffes Aldermen and whole communaltie of the Citie of London should promise vnto the King vpoÌ„ their fidelities not to set anie price vpoÌ„ Wines or other victualles by their common Councell within the said Citie vnlesse the King vnder his privie signett should first authorize theÌ„ so to doe were it not a meere collusion of the Kings meaning if everie particular AldermaÌ„ should sett prices of such things in every particular Ward But against the collection made from the Statutes 1. 8. Eliza the iudgement of the diuinies aforesaid the A collection made against the former reason by an Apologie for sundry proced by iurisdi Eccl. pag. 5. author of an Apologie to his vnderstanding reckoneth the same collection to be a very simple collection against the same hee answereth and reasoneth in effect thus If as is collected all power spirituall by a commission vnder the great Seale must be derived from the Queene to warrant the execution of it vnto him that is to exercise it then must the like warrant bee procured for euery temporall office to execute his temporall office But euery temporall officer must not procure like warrant to execute his temporall office Therefore a commission vnder the great Seale must not be procured to warrant the execution of the said spirituall power The consequence of his maior proposition being false he laboureth notwithstanding to make the same good and in effect for the same argueth thus All temporall authoritie as absolutly and as really is revested in the person of the Queene as is the said spirituall authoritie Therfore as all spirituall officers for the execution of the said spirituall power must haue their authoritie derived vnto theÌ„ from the person of the Queen vnder the great Seale so likewise must all temporall officers for the execution of their temporal offices haue the like commission The consequence of which enthimeme followeth not though the antecedent be true For although as well all teÌ„porall as all the said spiritual authoritie improperlie so called was reallie absolutelie in the person of the Queene yet herevpon it followeth not that by one and the selfe same meanes alone and namelie by a coÌ„mission vnder the great Seale all temporall and the said spirituall power in euerie part and braunch thereof should be drawen alike froÌ„ the Queenes person For there be divers and sundrie meanes to derive temporall authoritie whereas there seemeth to be but one onely meanes to derive the said spirituall authoritie and then marke the substance of the Authors argument Some temporall Officers as Stewards of Leetes Constables sundry other Officers must not drawe their temporall authoritie from the Queene by a commission vnder the great Seale Therefore no spirituall officers as Archbishops Bb Archdeacons and sâ—de vacante Deanes and Chapiters must drawe any of their spirituall authoritie from the Queene by a commission c. Which argument drawen from a particular affirmatiue vnto a general negatiue what weaknes it hath euery yong Logician can discerne And as for Stewardes af Leetes though they haue no Though all temporal officers drawe not their power from the Kinge by the great Seale yet by one meanes or other wtdrawe it froÌ„ the King commission vnder the great Seale yet for the executioÌ„ fo their Stewarships they haue a coÌ„mission vnder the Seale of the Exchequer Constables Decennary or Tythingmen and Thirdboroughes haue their authorities derived vnto the from the Kings person by the verie originall institution of their offices Sherifs of Countries Coroners Escheators and Verderors haue their offices and their â—uthorities warranted vnto them by the Kings writts out of the Chancerie But 〈◊〉 was not the mind of the Law-makers saith the Author that the Ordinaries by a commission vnder the great Seale should draw their saide spirituall power from the Queene What the mindes of the Law-makers were touching this poinct it mattereth litle or nothing at all Neither is it to purpose whether a commission vnder the great Seale bee necessarily required or not required by vertue of that statut 1. Eliz. c. 1. to warrant the said spirituall power vnto Ordinaries Only it sufficeth that the Queen having all power improperly called spirituall invested in her Royall person being really actually seysed of all the said supreme spirituall authoritie could not haue any parte of the same spirituall power drawn from her but by some one lawfull and ordinarie meanes or other For if this rule be true in euerie coÌ„mon person quod meum est sine mea voluntate à me auferri non potest how much more doth the same rule holde in the Royall prerogatiues rightes privileges dignities and supremities of a King Wherefore to saie that all supreme and ordinarie power improperly called spirituall was really and actually inherers in the Royall person of the Queene and to say also that some of the same inferior and ordinarie power not derived froÌ„ the Queen was neuerthelesse in the persons of inferior ordinaries is as much to say that some braunches of a tree may receyue nourishment from ells-where then from the roote that some meÌ„bers of the bodie are not guided by the head and that some streames flow nor from their fountaines And now to coÌ„clude this part against the canon law their Offices and functions thereof I dispute thus The forreigne and papall canon lawe with all the accessories dependances Offices and functions thereof is vtterlie abolited out of the Realme Therefore the same lawe is no part of the lawes of the Realme and therefore also it is evident that there will not followe any alteration of the lawes of the Realme by the taking of it away Which canon law also with other lawes functions how easely the same without any inconveniences may bee supplied shall God willing be presentlie made apparant if first we shall aunswere to that challenge which the state of Prelacie may seeme to make for the continuance of their Lordly primacie Chalenge for Lordly primacy out of the great Charter anâ—vered out of the wordes of the great Charter Concerning which challenge namelie that by the great Charter Lordly Archiepiscopal and Episcopall primacie or iurisdiction belonging to the state of Prelacie is belonging vnto them I demand vnto what Church this great Charter was graunted And whether it were not graunted vnto the Church of God in England The words of the Charter are these Concessimus Deo hac presenti Charta nostra confirmavimus pro nobis Mag. Charta c. 1.
them as by any of the reverende Bishops or venerable Archdeacons their Chancelors or Officials If there be ame exception alleaged by the defendant as of composition prescription or privilege the Kinges Iustices are as able to iudge of the validitie of these as they are now able to determine customes de modo decimandi or of the vse of high wayes of making and repayring of bridges of commons of pasture pawnage estovers or such like Trueth it is that of legacies and bequestes of Legacies how they may be recouered at the coÌ„mon lawe goods the reverend Bishops by sufferance of our Kinges and consent of our people haue accustomablie vsed to take cognyzance and to hold plea in their spirituall Courts Notwithstanding if the legacie be of landes where landes be divisible by Testament the iudgement thereof hath ben alwayes vsed and holden by the Kings writ and never in any ecclesiasticall Court Wherfore if it shall please the King to enlardge the authoritie of his Courtes temporall by commandinge matters of legacies and bequestes of goods aswell as of landes to be heard and determined in the same it were not much to be feared but that the Kings Iustices the Kings learned Counsell and others learned in the law of the Realme without any alteration of the same law would spedelie find meanes to applie the grounds thereof aswell to all cases of legacies and bequests of goods as of landes For if there bee no goods divisible by will but the same are grauÌ„table and confirmable by deede of gift could not the Kings Iustices aswel iudge of the gift of the thing given by will as of the graunt of the thing graunted by deede of gift or can they not determine of a legacie of goods aswell as of a bequest of landes If it should come in debate before them whether the Testator at the time of making his will were of good perfect memorie vpon profes and other circumstances to bee opened and made of the Testators memorie by livelie testimonies either the Admonitor must condemne the Kinges learned and discreete Iustices to be 〈◊〉 mentis insanae memoriae or els it must be confessed that they be as well able to iudge of the distraction of wits and vnsoundnes of memorie in a person deceased as they be to determine the question of Lunacie madnesse or idiocie in a man living If anie question should arise vpon the revocation of a former will of the ademptioÌ„ of a legacie or of a legacie giuen vpon coÌ„dition or in diem it would be 〈◊〉 matter for the learned Iudges vpon sight of the Will and proofes to be made to define which is the first and which is the last will whether the legacie remayne or whether it be revoked whether it be legatum per rerum or 〈◊〉 whether condicionall or without condition And if it bee condicional whether the same be possible or impossible honest or dishonest and if it be 〈◊〉 whether the day bee past or to come But there lyeth no action at the commoÌ„ lawe for a legatorie against the executor to recover his legacie I graunt But a creditor to recover his dâ—â—t due by the testator vpon specialtie may bringe an action at the common law against the executor And then what is the cause that a creditor may recover his debt that a legatorie can not recover his legacie in the Kinges Court but onlie for that remedie could not be giuen vnto legatories complaynantes by any writt out of the Chancerie And therefore that such plaintifes might not be deferred of their right 21. Ed. 1. statute vpon the writt of consultation remedie in such cases to their great damage it hath pleased the Kinges by sufferance to tolerate the Church officers to determine these cases Wherefore if it might please the King to cause Writtes to bee made out of his Court of Chancerie for the recoverie of Legacies it were cleere by the common law of the Realme as from the statute may be gathered that the cognizance of these cases did not appertayne anie more to the spirituall Court. For then might the legatorie by that Writt bring an actioÌ„ against the executor to obteine his Legacie But how should that action be tryed How even as other actions of debt detinue or trover be tried namelie as the case should require either by the countrey or by the Iudges vpon a moratur in lege As Testamentes with their adherences so likewise matters of Spousalles Matters of mariages more meete to bee decided by the Kings then by the Bb. officers Mariages divorces c. togither their accessories by common right of the Imperiall Crowne did in auncient times properlie apperteyne to the examinations and sentences of the Emperours them selues to their Provostes Deputies and Presidentes of Cities and Provinces as by the several titles de Testamentis Legatis Fidei commissis Nuptijs repudijs divortio dote c. in the books of the civil law appeareth By the Law of England also the King hath the mariadge of an heyre being within age in his warde Widowes also that hold of the King in chiefe must not marie them selues without the Kings licence And by an Act made 4. and 5. Phil. and Mary there is a streight punishment provided against all such as shall take away Maydens that be inheritors being within the age of sixteene yeres or marie them without consent of their Parentes And what reason letteth them that the King might not as well haue the care and cognoyzance of all the coÌ„tractes of mariage especially of the mariage of all children and Widowes in his temporall Courtes as he hath of some parties to bee contracted of the Dower of the ioynture of the dis aragment of the age of the 〈…〉 way of the deflouring and of manage without parentes consent in some cases or what a verie great alteration of the common Law could ensue in case the Kings temporall Iustices did examine and determine whether the contract were a pefect and simple or condicionall contract yea or no For if vpon the statute made by Phi. and Mary that Maydens and Women children of Noble men GentlemeÌ„ c. being heyres apparant c. and being left within age of xvj yeares should not marie against the will or vnknowing of or to the Father or against c. If I say vpon the publishing of this Act there hath no alteration of the common law hitherto followed it is but a meere superstitious errour to feigne that a change of the coÌ„mon law must followe if so be this statute were extended to all children both Sonnes and Daughters of what parentage sexe estate or age so euer For if the King in his temporall Courts had the definitioÌ„ of all aswell as of some contractes made by children without consent of parents then should a multitude of lewde and vngodlie contractes made by flatterie trifling gifts faire and goodly promises of many vnthriftie and light personages
thervnto wonne by intreatie of persons of lewde demeanoure be pronounced voide and of no efficacie yea on the other side a number of honest lawfull and godlie contractes should bee confirmed and remaine in their full strenght and force which nowe vpon certeyne frivolous and trifeling quiddities and nicities of Much a doe in the ecclesiasticall Courts about accipio accipiam wordes and sillabes are pronounced in the ecclesiasticall Courts to be no contracts And in good earnest is there now a dayes any soundnes of reason at all to be heard amongst the Doctors and proctors of those courts where they inform out of the canon law in these cases For doth not their whole dispute and information rest principallie whether the contract bee made by wordes of the present or of the future tence whether it be made with an oath or without an oath yea and doe they not exceedingly besweate and besmyre them selves by turning and returning by folding and vnfolding their great and hydeous volumes for profe and reprofe of accipio accipiam yea and sometimes of letters and accentes If the yong-man and mayde having both of them their parents consent shall answere onelie in the future tence I will haue thee or I will take thee or I am content to take thee or I will haue none other but thee or if ever I marie I will marie thee and do not answere directlie I do take thee to mine husbande or I doe take thee to my wife oh it is a world to see and a wonderment to beholde what canvasing heaving and shoving what a stirre quoyle and garboyle the Canonistes make about the lifting and removing of these fethers And whatsoever the holie Scriptures haue determined of the necessitie of parents consent or of what necessitie likewise so ever the a Institu de â—up §. 1. civill law hold the consent of parentes to bee yet in the ecclesiasticall Courts the papall canon lawe must needes take place because by the same law consent of parentes is not de necessitate but de honestate tantum and because also matrimonia debent esse libera non pendere ex alieno arbitrio Wherein the reverend Bishops vnder their favourable pacience The canon law preferred by the revereÌ„d Bb. before the law of God and the civil law can not clearly excuse them selves of much oversight in so slender managing of a matter of so great and high a consequence The holie law of God by publike authoritie hath bene commanded within this Realme to be sincerelie and purelie taught received and embraced The civil law hath not had her free course in this case hindered by any law of the Realme And how then commeth it to passe that the canon lawe beeing in this point repugnaÌ„t to both these lawes should notwithstanding bee preferred beare sway take place in this Realm before aboue both these lawes especiallie the same in this point as beeing against the law of God being vtterly taken away The abuses past mariages past vnder coloure and pretext of this law may and ought to be bewayled and repented of yea and that no such mariages in time to come may bee made I leave it to bee considered whether it Certaine speciall pointes to be provided about mariages might not tend to the advancement of the lawe of God bee honorable for the King commodious for the common weale providentlie to provide these things following viz. First that no matrimonie secretlie contracted against the will or vnknowing of or to the Father or him or her that hath the keeping educatioÌ„ or goverment of the partie to be maried before he or thee come to a certaine age should in any sorts be good or avaylable to make the posâ—â—tie of those who shall bee so maried legitimate or inheritable Secondlie that euery contract of mariage concluded with consent of Parents Tutor Governour or Gardian should be forcible and effectuall to bind both parties irrevocablie whether the same contract with an intent to conclude a mariage be made by wordes of the present or future tence it skilleth not Thirdlie that euery man stealing away contracting and marying a mayde vnder the age of certeyne yeeres without consent of Father Tutor Governour or Gardian should be a felon and for such his felonious act suffer the paynes of death And lastlie that all liceÌ„ces to marie without banes asking according to the intendement of the booke of common prayer be forbiddeÌ„ and vnlawfull for euer Which things if they might be observed it is verie likelie that mens inheritances as now many times they do should not hang in suspence vpon question of legitimation or illegitimation of their children to be alowed or disallowed by the canon law There should not any such long and tedious sâ—â—tes variances hereafter fall out betwene the posterities and children of one man for the right interest of their Auncestors Complaint heeretofore made vpon stealing away marying mens daughters howe they may cease Lands Neither should Sir Thomas Lucie nor Sir Edmund Ludlow nor the Ladie Norton nor Maister Cooke the Kings Atturney generall nor many moe Knights Esquiers Gentlemen complayne and bewayle the stealing away and mariages of anie their daughters Neeces nere KinswomeÌ„ or Wardes Neither could it bee possible that one Woman might procure foure or fiue severall licences for the mariage of foure or five severall husbands all of them being alive together not one of them dead Neither should there anie LiceÌ„ce of mariage be graunted out of an Ecclesiasticall Court to anie man or woman with a blanck whereby the partie liceÌ„sed was enabled to haue maried an other mans wyfe or his owne or his wyves sister Neither should any couples maried and livinge together foure sixe or more yeeres as man and wyfe vpon a new and suddayne dislike or discontentement vpon a surmised precontract to be pretensedlie proued by two suborned witnesses be adiudged by vertue of the canon law to be no husband and to bee no wife Neither should any man being solemlie maried to a wyfe afterward by reason of a precontract solemlie divorced from the same his wyfe and by censures of the Church compelled to marie her for whom sentence of precoÌ„tract was adiudged be reauthorized by the same Consistorie about tenne or twelve yeres after the divorce to resommon recall rechalenge his first wife especiallie she having a testimoniall out of the same Consistorie of her lawfull divorce and being againe solemlie maried to an other husband Wherefore to conclude these matters of Tythes Testaments and Mariages if the King should not be pleased to haue the studie of the civill law advanced by some such lawe as whereof the former proiect maketh mencion I dispute for the enlargement of the common law thus If it stand with reason with the grounds and rules of the common law with the Kinges Royall prerogative that in cases of Tythes Testaments Mariages the King
money to bee paid and distributed yerelie of the fruites and profits of the same churches by those that shall haue the same churches in proper vse by their successors to the poore parochiaÌ„s of the same churches in aide of their living sustentation for ever and also that the Vicar be well and sufficientlie endowed By which statute it appeareth that every impropriatioÌ„ ought to be made by liceÌ„ce out of the Chancerie that it ought to be made to the vse of ecclesiasticall persons onlie not to the vse of temporall persons or patrones Now then all such parish churches as without licence of the King in his Chancerie haue bin appropried to any ecclesiasticall person and againe all such parish churches as by licence of the King in his Chancerie haue bene appropried to the vse of laye persons they are not to be accompted mens lawfull possessions heritages Besides this as many impropriations as wherevpon the Diocesan of the place hath not ordeined according to the value of such churches a convenient summe of money to be paid distributed yearlie of the frutes of the same churches c. to the poore Parochians of the same churches in aide of their living and sustentation for euer yea every church also appropried as wherevnto a perpetuall Vicare is not ordeined canonically to be instituted inducted in the same and which is not convenably endowed to doe divine service and to enforme the people and to keepe hospitalitie there all and everie such church churches I say otherwise then thus appropried by the law of the Realme as it seemeth are not mens lawfull possessions and inheritances For by a statute of Kinge Henry the fourth everie church after the 15. year of King Richard the second 4 H. 4. c. 12 appropried by licence of the King against the form of the said statute of R. 2. if the same were not dulie reformed after the effect of the same statute within a certeyne time appointed then the same appropriation and licence thereof made presentlie the parish Church of Hadenham onlie excepted was adiudged to be voyd and vtterly repealed and adnulled for euer And therefore I leaue it to the inquisition of our Soveraigne Lord the King whether the impropriatioÌ„ of the parish church of Bâ—lgraue in the Countie of Leycester wherevnto two Chapples are annexed and other Churches appropried to the Bishop of Leycester since the statutes of Richard the seconde and Henry the fourth bee the lawfull or vnlawfull possession and heritage of the same Bishop yea or no. And if it be lawfullie appropried and so a lawfull possession and heritage then I leaue it againe to the inquisition of the King what summe of money out of the fontes of the same church ought yearlie to be distributed to the poore ParochiaÌ„s what the endowment of a Vicare canonicallie to be instituted and inducted in the same church should be what house is appointed for the same Vicar to keepe his hospitalitie in and whether any Vicare for the space of these many yeres passed hath bin Canonicallie instituted and inducted in the same church to possesse that endowment to inhabite that same house and enforme that people For if by the appropriation it selfe or by the abuse thereof the poore Parochians haue bin defrauded of their yearelie distribution or if no Vicares haue bene Canonicallie instituted and inducted in the same or if being inducted they haue their indowments so small or so covetouslie kept backe from them as that they can not sufficientlie mainteine theÌ„ selues much lesse keepe hospitalitie theÌ„ as the Admonitor coÌ„fesseth there must needes be a lamentable abuse of impropriations and that therefore it is greatlie to be wished that by some good statute it might be remedied And as those churches which are vnlawfully appropried are not the lawfull possession and heritage of the proprietaries so on the other side we aâ—â—irme that those impropriations which were made reformed according to the statutes of Ri. 2. He. 4. may well stand as mens lawfull possessions and heritages even with those things which are required to be planted brought into the Church whatsoever the Admonitor hath written to the contrarie For wee doe not holde that maintenance must onlie and necessarilie be provided for everie Minister by the payment of tythes oblations and other ecclesiasticall profites belonging to churches appropried or disappropried For there being no direct proofe to be made out of the law of God that Ministers of the Gospell must onelie liue vpon tythes the King and Parleament may well and competentlie inough appoint covenable endowments for everie Minister without disapproprying of any church appropried And therefore litle cause had the Admonitor to insinuate the ruine of impropriations vpon the bringing in the discipline of our Savior Christ because the same may bee well planted and yet to other not vnplanted But what neede we to argue against his insinuation considering he him selfe before he came to the end of this page by his owne disclayme contradicted his insinuation For if the forme of finding Ministers by tythes must with the canon law as he saith be abolished and if there must be some other order for this devised because this may seeme papisticall and Antichristian what should anie man feare the taking away of those lawes whereby impropriations do stand For if such as heretofore haue spoken or written against them because as he insinuateth the forme of finding Ministers by tythes seemed to be vnlawfullie taken away and as he would also insinuate by their iudgement ought againe to be restored and not to stande any longer as mens lawfull possessions and heritages How I saye doth it followe that they which desire impropriations to bee restored to their pristinate state should withall require to haue the findinge of Ministers by tythes to bee abolished It seemeth therefore that the Admonitor so he might be talking passed but a â—itle what he talked For what a double talke is heere or to what purpose was this talke Was it because some men do thinke that the Ministers ought not to receyue tythes for their reliefe paynes in the Ministerie Why then let all men knowe that we disclayme such some mens opinions For wee accompt all things perteyning to this lyfe directlie or by consequence not commaunded nor prohibited by the holy and sacred Scriptures to be things indifferent and that therefore we may vse them or not vse them as the commoditie or incommoditie of the Church shall require And therfore as we doe not affirme that the maintenance of the Ministers must onelie and necessarilie bee levied out of tythes oblations and such like so also we do not denie but that the tenth part of the increase of all our goodes by the authoritie of the King his lawes may be allotted for their possession and hâ—ritage especiallie in our couÌ„trey the same manner of payment beeing so auncient and so agreeable to the maners vsages and disposition of our
Rectors of the churches appropried and haue cura◠animaru◠in the same parishes then wee must instantlie againe pray the King that those Prebendaries by some wholesome lawe may be constreyned to reside and to incumbe vpon their saide prebendes and parochiall churches and that by continuall preaching of wholsome doctrine they may endevoure to cure the soules of the people over whō by the order of those great churches they be set over whom they haue taken charge And withall that they may no more be suffered to lye and to liue idlelie in their Cloysters in their caves and in their dennes sometimes at Worcester sometimes at Hereforde sometimes at Gloucester sometimes at Salisburie sometimes at Westminster sometimes at Soutwell sometimes at Windsore sometimes at Paules sometimes at Oxforde and sometimes at Cambridge When in the meane while both seldome and very slenderlie they feede other sheepe whose fleeces they take in and about London Winchester Tewkesburie Reading and other places of the Countrey Besides we pray that these prebendes after the determinatiō of leases now in being may never any more be let to farm so that the frutes thereof may serve for those Prebendaries or other succeeding Ministers to make Hospitalities Almes and other workes of charitie If it be alleadged that the King now hauing first frutes Tenthes and Subsidies out of the impropriatiōs of those great churches as being all comprised vnder a grosse summe of the Tenthes payable for the whole revenues of the same churches should loose the first frutes Tentes and subsidies of the same impropriations if hereafter they become either donative or presentative to this the aunswere is readilie made viz. that Tenthes first frutes and Subsidies might as well bee paide then as now And that the Kinge might then aswell haue right to the donation of the benefice disappropried as the Bishop now hath the gift of the prebend appropried In the next ranck cometh commutation to be spoken of Wherein because the impropriations of Parochiall churches apperteyning now to the King Nobles Commons Colledges Scholes Bodies politicke c. were at the firste appropried one lie by the discretion of the Diocesans Predecessors to the reverend Bishoppes that now are vnto Abbottes Prioures Nunnes Friars c. and because the Successours of those Diocesans be bound in the same band of iniquitie with their predecessors vnles by all good meanes they labor that things may be brought to their first and pristinate state it seemeth equall iust that this commutation should likewise proceede and be drawen frō the Diocesans and great Churches before specified The reasons whereof may bee such as follow The Landes and possessions given by the Kings progenitors the Earles Barons other great men of the Realme to Bishoprickes were not giuen as Maister Bilson affirmeth to vnburden the people of the support and chardges of Perpetu. power Pag. 367. their Bb. but they were given as the law of our lande teacheth vs first to enforme the people in the lawe of God in those churches Secondlie to keepe Hospitalities almes other workes of charitie And thirdlie for the soules of the founders their heyres and of all christian Now then if some of these condicions be such as for the impietie thereof ought not to be performed and if other some also being good and godly be not performed and so the thinges are to returne to their first nature as in the same statute is alleaged then is it reason that the Kinge and Nobles who are the iust inheritors and successours to those who were firsT Donoures and Founders of those Churches should haue as free a disposition and donation of those lands and possessions now as his and their progenitors and auncestours ever had And seeing it is manifest that the lands possessions of Archbishops Bishops Deanes and Chapters doe not for the most part nowe a dayes serue for those good vses for the which they were first granted namelie to enforme the people in the law of God to keepe Hospitalities Almes and other workes of charitie but partlie for the vse of chaunting and singing in the Quyers partlie to vayne idle superfluous and pompous vses the King can not do a better and more charitable deede then to convert parcell of the same landes and possessions thus by defect of the condicions not performed returning to their first nature to and for the necessarie perpetuall provision of learned able preaching Ministers to bee planted in Parochiall churches nowe destitute of sufficient Pastoures for want of sufficient maintenance naye sit hence Archbishoprickes Bishoprickes other Prelacies by the verie expresse letter of the statute are said to be founded to supersticious vses viz. for the soules of the founders their heyres and of all christian the same reason whiche led Kinge Henrie the eight his Nobles and Parleamentes to dissolve Abbayes and Monasteries the same reason also which moved King Edward the sixt with his Nobles Parleament to dissolve Colledges free Chappels and Chauntries the same reason may be a sufficient reason to perswade our Soveraigne Lord King IAMES that now is with his Nobles and Parleament to dissolve Archbishoprickes Bishoprikes Deanries c First to the end these Prelacies and Dignities may never in anie succeding ages serve to anie such superstitious vses as wherevnto they were at the first erected Secondlie that the King having them al in his owne hands and free disposition may be the onlie Foundor and Donour of so many new Bishoprickes as might please him to erect endowe with such liberall and covenable endowmentes as might serve for learned Evangelicall Bishoppes to enforme the people in the holy Evangill of Christ to keepe hospitalities almes and to doe other workes of charitie rather then to be expended as now for a great parte they are vpon the keeping of great horses coroches and troupes of serving idlers The commutation then whereof we speake and which wee most humblie commend to the consideration of the King is viz That parcell of the temporall Landes possessions of Archbb and Bishoppes togither with all the landes and possessions serving to the mainrenance of idle Ministers and idle Songsters in Cathedrall and Collegiat churches the Collegiat churches of Eaton and Winchester and the Cathedrall and Collegiat churches in Oxford Cambridge excepted by an equal and reasonable proportion may bee made with such impropriations as belong to the King the Nobles Commons Colledges Hospitals Scholes c. Provided as before hath bin said that there may be a liberall and couvenable endowment for the learned Bishops or Pastors to be continued and placed in all the chief and principall townes cities of the Realm And that the impropriations of Parochiall churches may for ever be livings for the Ministers of the same churches And therefore in the iust defence of the innocencie of all such as require a godlie and religious reformation wee say that they ought not to haue ben traduced before the Kinge
duties to God as also towardes the King and common weale and lastlie the former danger of the soules of the Citizens If then in these dayes it might please the King to applie like playsters to the like sorcs to provide remedies for the like mischieves and for the like diseases to minister like medicins it would come to passe no doubt in few yeares that the lame the blind the broken with a number of vnhallowed and vncleane beastes should be swept and cast foorth of all the Parochiall churches within Canterburie Winchest Chichester Lichfield Oxford and other great Cities of the Realme For these Chapples and smaler churches being the verie Chapples the seminaries of hyrelings Seminaries of all hyrelinges and idoll Sheapheards a benefice can no sooner become voyd but the poore and hungrie Chapleynes wearie of their thynne dyet and long leaping after a beane presentlie trudge to the patrone offering or accepting any condicions to be presented by him And not onelie should the Church by this meanes bee rid of these vermine but also the learned preaching Minister without further aide or coÌ„tribution in those places might haue more liberall maintenance then erst they haue had For then should they be no more constreyned to deduct out of their livings by reason of Chapples yet standing and as it were annexed to their Parish churches some 10. lb. some 20. lb. some 30. lb. by the yeare for the wages of these hyrelings Besides this a singuler and apparant benefite By yâ— dissolution of Chappels many suites in law shold be avoyded could not but redound to the common weale by the dissolution of these Chapples when as many long tedious and changeable vncharitable sutes heretofore had commenced should hereafter bee extinguished between the Parochians of the mother Churches and the inhabitants of Hamblets for concerning the repayre and reedifying of the said Churches and Chapples for other rights and duties chalenged to belong from one vnto the other A third meanes to leavie a treasure Sequestration of the fruits of the Churches of pluralists may further the treasure for the redemption of impropriations for the redemption of impropriations may be a sequestration of the fruites of the Churches of non Residentes and commendames with the fruites of the Churches of the pluralistes and perinde valeres from the which the same plurisied persons are to depart the said sequestration no longer to endure then some able Ministers may be provided placed in the same Churches A fourth meane to rayse this treasure if it please the King and that the church have found favour in his sight may bee the money due vnto the King vpoÌ„ such penall lawes as for the benefite of the commoÌ„ weale are necessarilie to be put in execution especially vpon the law of provision and premunire not pardoued by the Queene And albeit happelie the King vpon a most worthie and christian zeale be well pleased hereafter not to vrge vpon the popish recusantes the paymeÌ„t of their forfeytures for absence from divine service yet because they be able and do daylie contribute to seminaries abroad and be favourers and abettours of popish Priestes and Iesuites lurking at home the most treasonable daungerous enemies that can be to the Kings Person and State in coÌ„sideration heereof I say if it may please the King it seemeth not vnreasonable the lawe standing still in force and vnrepealed that the popish recusants be vrged to the payment of such summes of money as are alreadie forfeyted the same by the commaundement and free gift of the King to be imployed vpon the redemption of such impropriatioÌ„s as are within the parishes of their abodes To the end that learned and preaching Ministers being placed in the same they their wyves children servaunts tenants and dependantes by the powerful preaching of the worde might be converted vnto the Gospell It followeth now in order that wee speak of contributioÌ„ the fourth meanes By what coÌ„tributioÌ„ impropriations may be brought to the vse of the ministerie whereby some impropriations may bee reduced whollie to the vse of the Ministerie Wherein there can not any certeyne rule or direction bee prescribed because it must proceed onlie froÌ„ those whose heartes God shall touch stirre vp encourage willinglie to bring a free offering vnto the Lord for the building vp of his spirituall house For of everie one saith the Lorde whose heart offereth Exod. 25. 2 it freelie yee shall take an offeringe for me And everie one whose heart encouraged him and whose Spirite made him willing and men and women as manie as were free-hearted came and Exod. 35. brought taches and earings and ringes and bracelettes all were iewells of gold and blewe silke and purple skarlett and fine linnen and goates hayre and Rammes skinnes and Badgees skinnes and silver and brasse Shittim wood and Onix stones and Spice and Oyle Everie man and woman I saye whose heartes moved them willinglie to bring for all the worke which the Lorde had Exod. 36. 5. commaunded brought a free offering yea and the people brought too much and more theÌ„ ynough for the vse of the worke of the Lord. King Salomon having 2. King 8. all the Elders the heads the chiefe Fathers and all the men of Israell the Priestes and Levites to bring vppe the Arck and Tabernacle of the Lord offered Beeves and sheepe which could not be numbred for multitude Yea and after these offeringes were made and after the Kinge had prayed that their heart might bee perfect with the Lord their God to walke in his statutes to keepe his commaundementes as at that day the King agayne offered a sacrifice of two and twentie thousande beeves one hundred and twentie thousande sheepe and so was the house dedicated After the returne of the people out of captiuitie certeyne of the chiefe Fathers when they came to the house of the Lorde which was in Ierusalem they gave after their abilitie vnto the treasure of the worke even one and three score thousand drammes of golde and five thousande pieces of silver and an hundred priestes garmentes they gave money also Eâ—â— 2. 2 68 c. to the Masons and to the workmen and meate and drinke and oyle Yea at the exhortatioÌ„ of Nehemiah the Priests the great men the people and the women Nehe. 2. 〈◊〉 that they might bee no more a reproch sett their mindes to the building of the Walls and at their owne charges builded some one gate some another some one doore some another som one tower some another some one portion of the Wall some an other Wherefore seeing we haue not an Ester to succeed our Deborah but a Salomon rather to succeede a David yea such a Salomon as whose heart the Lord hath filled with an excellent spirite of wisedome of vnderstanding and of knowledge to finde out and to dissolve hard curious parables hath put in his heart
did neuer yet stande by the authoritie of the three Estates I will take his meaning to be that the statute lawes of England to this day haue stood by authority of the three Estates which to alter nowe by leaving out the one c. and then therevnto I aunswere that not any one of the three The bringing in of the discipline by pastours and elders is not the leauing out of Parleament any one of of the three Estates Estates should be left out or barred frō having authoritie in making and promulging statute lawes though the goverment of the Church by Pastors and Elders were brought in For we which so much cry as he saith for this maner of gouerment to be planted are so farr from exempting or excluding any one of the three Estates from their auncient power priviledge and preheminence in the making of statute lawes as that we pronounce him to bee guilty of high treason to the King and to the Realme that avoweth the contrary And we affirme directly and confesse plainly that it belongeth onely wholy and altogether to the three Estates as well to roote out and to pull vp whatsoever goverment is not iustifiable by the holy law of God as also to plant to setle whatsoever discipline is warrantable by the same law And to speake as the thing is how were it possible to haue the discipline by Pastors Elders planted by authoritie of the three Estates if one of the three Estates should be left out Or can it be imagined that any one of the three Estates would euer consent to the bringing in of such a governement of the Church as whereby the same goverment being once brought in the same estate should ever afterwards cease to be any more an estate Besides we acknowledge that all powers are of God therfore euery one of the three Estates being a power wee graunt that the same hath his stateship by the authoritie of God And if all the three Estates be lawfull by the holie law of God how can it be verified against vs that we which vrge the same holy law for the bringing in of the discipline by Pastors and Elders should notwithstanding contrary to the same law intend the leaving out or altering of any one of the three Estates But which of the three Estates was it that he ment should be left out I trow there The state of the Prelacie is not one of the three estates in Parleament is none of the state of Prelacie so ill advised as to take vpon him the proofe of this position viz. That the Lords spirituall by them selves alone doe make one of the three Estates or that the statutes of England to this day haue stood by their authorities as by the authoritie of those who alone by themselves are to be accompted one of the three Estates For if that were so how much more thē might the great Peres Nobles and temporall Lords chalenge to make by them selves an other estate And without contradiction to this day the Commons summoned by the Kings writ haue ever bene reckoned a third Estate Now then if statutes haue hitherto stood by authoritie of the Lords spiritual as of the first Estate by authoritie of the Lordes temporall as of the second Estate by authoritie of the Commons as of the third Estate I would gladly be resolved what accoumpt the Admonitor made of the Kings Estate It had not bene liegnes nor loyaltie I am sure howsoever hee spake much of the Lords spirituals duty and fidelitie in the execution of our late Queenes lawes to haue set her Royall person authoritie and State behind the lobby at the Parliament doore Either the Kinges Royall person then as not comprised within the compasse and circumscription of the three Estates by his meaninge which had bene but a very bad meaning must be thought to haue bene hitherto secluded from authorizing the statute lawes made in Parliament Or it is a most cleare case that the Lords spiritual them selves alone do not make any one of the three Estates And what matter then of more weight may it happelie seeme to be to alter the authoritie of the Lords spirituall and to leaue them out of the Parliament when as notwithstanding they being left out the statutes of England may remaine continue by authoritie of the three Estates And it were not amisse for the Lords spirituall to consider that the bodie and state of the weale publike both now is and euer hath bene a perfect entire and complete body and State without the body and state of Prelacie And that the King the Nobles Commons of the Realme without Prelates Bishops or Clerckes do make vp all the members and parts of this body and of this state and may therefore ordaine promulge and execute all maner of lawes without any consent approbation or authoritie yeelded vnto the same Anno 36 H 8. fo 58. b. Anno 〈◊〉 j. fo 93. 2 by the Bishops spirituall or any of the Clergie And thus much our Divines Histories Lawes do iustifie Sir Iames Dier Lord chiefe Iustice of the cōmon pleas in his reportes telleth vs that the state and body of a Parliament in England consisteth first of the Kinge as of the head and chief part of the body secondlie of the Lordes as principall members and lastlie of the Commons as inferiour members of that bodie By a Statute of provisoes it appeareth 25. Ed. 3. holy church founded in the state of Prelacie by the King That the holy Church of England was founded into the state of Prelacie within the realme of England by the grandfather of King Edward the third and his progenitours and the Earles Barons and other Nobles of the Realme and their Auncestors for them to enforme the people of the law of God These vses are changed to the keeping of great horses great troupes of idlers with long hayre and great chaines of golde to make Hospitalities and almes and other workes of Charitie in the places where the churches were foūded From whence it followeth First that the Archbishoppes Bishoppes onelie alone doe not make of themselues any state of Prelacie but that the whole holy church of England was founded into a state of Prelacie Secondlie it is playne that the 6. Eliz. c. ◠Kings of England before they and the Earles Barons and other Nobles and great men had founded the holy church of Englande into a State of Prelacie ought and were bounden by the accord The Kinge boūd to doe lawes made without assent of Prelates to bee kept as laws of the realm of their people in their Parleaments to reforme and correct whatsoeuer was offensive to the lawes and rightes of the Crowne and to make remedy and lawe in avoyding the mischieves damages oppression and greevances of their people yea and that the Kings were bound by their oathes to doe the same lawes so made to be kept as lawes of the
holy Gospell harboured onely by the Queene the Lords temporall and commons what more playne euidence or better proofe can there be that the Lords spiritual by any necessitie be neither principalls nor accessaries neither branches nor buddes neither hanginges nor sealings nor anie furniture for the house of Parleament And of this opinioÌ„ are the soundest Historians and sincerest Divines of our age In the fifteenth yeere of King Edward Act. Mo. fol. 320. the third saieth Maister Fox divers petitions being put vppe in Parleament against provisions comming from Rome the Kinges answere and agreement was made in forme following viz It is agreed by the Kinge Earles Barons Iustices other wise men of the Realme That the petitions aforesaid be made in sufficient forme of law Where it is to be noted saith he that at the graunt hereof the consent of the Bishoppes is neither named nor expressed with the Lords of Parleament and yet the Parleament standeth in his full force notwithstanding At an other Parleament saith he William Wicham Bishoppe of Winchester Act. Mo. 525. for a slaunderous report savouring of a contumelious lye and proceeding of a subtile zeale meaning falsehoode was so by the Duke of Lancaster pursued that by act of Parleament hee was condemned and depriued of all his temporall goods And this seemeth to haue bin done saith Maister Fox without assent and against the willes of the Lords spirituall for afterwarde at an other Parleament great sute was made by the Cleargie for deliverance of the said Bishoppe and being asked a subsidie in the Kings behalfe with great lamentation they complayned for lacke of their fellow and brother of Winchester and denied to ioyne them selves in anie tractation of anie such matter And in another ParleameÌ„t holden at Yorke in the sixt yeere of King Edward the third all Act. Mo. 519. such lawes as then passed and were coÌ„cluded by the King Barons and Commons were good notwithstandinge the absence or malice of the Lordes spirituall For it is recorded saith he that onlie the Archb. of Yorke the Bishoppe of Lincolne and the Abbottes of Yorke Silby were there present In a booke intituled the burninge of Paules church in London 1561. and in the fift question moved by a papist it is said that this maner of ministration of Sacramentes set foorth in the booke of coÌ„moÌ„ prayers was neuer allowed nor agreed vpon c. no not by the Clergie of Englande at the last Parleament but onlie it was agreed vpon by the Laitie which had nothing a doe with spirituall matters or causes of religion Wherevnto the Reverend Father Maister Pilkington M. PilkingtoÌ„ Bishop of Duresme Bishop of Duresme aunswering was there not saith he a disputation for Religion appointed by the Queenes Maiestie wherein your Clergie was affraid to vtter their foolishnes in defending their superstition least they had taken more shame in answering theÌ„ they did in holding their peace I thinke the Vniversities with so manie places of the Realm receiving religion these other disputing for it may be counted to bee some part of the Clergie of the Realme And so it was not receyued without consent of the Clergie But these were not of the Parleament What then But as Ioash Iosaphat Ezekias and Iosias did not make a new religion but restored that which was defaced had long lien buried so our Parleament did not set forth a new religion but restore that which was godlie begane vnder the good King Edward confirmed by the Parleament and Clergie then c. But nothing can be concluded as a lawe by Parleament say they without consent of the Clergie there present But this havinge not their consent can not be counted a law as they thinke I had rather saith Maister Pilkington leaue this to bee aunswered by the Lawiers then otherwise Yet that the world may see that some thing may be saide in it we graunt him not this to be true that no law at all can be made without consent of Bishoppes Looke your old statutes of Parleament when Bb. were highest afore Edward the third and yee shall reade that they passed by the consent of the Lords temporall and commons without any mencion of the Lords spirituall which statutes many of them stand in strenght at this day Then it may well be gathered that the consent of the Clergy was not alwayes so necessarie as they thinke it The Lawyers Iudges and Iusticeâ—s put in practise execute these lawes therfore their doinges may bee a sufficient reason to lead the vnlearned what opinion they haue of these statutes For Religion except Iustice Raftall first executing that and afterward runing away may condemne the rest which I trust he may not I thinke they would not execute them except they had the strength and nature of lawes If they doe contrarie to their knowledge and opinion they can not bee able to answere their doings but I thinke no wise men are of this opinion Only these corner creepers that dare not shew their face and would deceyue the people goe about to deface all good godly order that displeases them In the dayes of King Edward they had the like fonde opinion that the Kinge could not make lawes in his minoritie vntill he came vnto full age and to make the people to disobey their Prince Hetherto Maister Pilkington Lorde Bishop of Duresme with whom the most worthy learned Maister Iewell late Bishop of Salisburie M. Iewel B. of Salisbury agreeth in every point The wise and learned saith he could haue told you that in the Parleaments of England matters haue evermore vsed to passe not of necessitie by the speciall consent of the Archbishops Bishops as if without them no statute might lawfully be enacted but onely by the more part of voyces yea although the Archb. Bishops were neuer so earnestly bent against it And statutes so passing in Parleaments onely by the voyces of the Lords temporall without the consent and agreement of the Lordes spirituall haue nevertheles bin alwayes coÌ„firmed and ratified by the Royall assent of the Prince and haue bene enacted and published vnder the names of the Lordes spirituall and temporall Read saith he the statutes of K Edward the first there shall ye find that in a ParliameÌ„t holden at St Edmondsbury the Archbishops Bishops were quite shut foorth and yet the Parleament held on and good and profitable lawes were there enacted the departing or absence or malice of the Bishops spirituall notwithstanding In the recordes thereof it is written thus Habito Rex cum suis Baronibus Parliamento Clero excluso statutum est The King keeping a Parleament with his Barons the Clergie that is to say the Archbishops and Bishops beeing shut foorth it was enacted c. In provisione de matrona in the time of King Edward the third whereas matter was moved of bastardy touching the legitimation of bastards borne before mariage the statute passed wholy with
the Lordes temporall whether the Lordes spirituall would or no. And that contrary to the expresse decrees canons of the church of Rome And thus much the most reverend and godly Father Maister Iewell Bishop of Salisbury wherefore to conclude this point against the Admonitors position I dispute thus All those persons who by any necessity are none of the three estates and by whose authorities the statutes of England to this day haue not stood to leaue out the same persons may happely seeme a matter of lesse weyght then all men doe iudge it But the Archb and Bb. are such persons as by necessitie are none of the three estates and by whose consents the statutes of Englande to this day haue not stood Therefore to leaue out the Archb and Bb. may happely seeme a matter of lesse weight then all men doe iudge it If our Evangelicall Bishops be of that opinion of which the Popish Bishops were viz that the house of Parleament is an vnfit an vnmeete place to haue the holie cause of the religion of God debated and concluded vpon and that the Layitie without the Clergie ought not to conclude any thinge in religion that in respect hereof their presences their voyces and their assents are necessarie in the Parleament If our Evangelicall Prelates I say make this obiection then besides that hereby they vnseemely vnmannerly vnchristianly accuse the whole land of ignorance and blindnes in religion supposing neither King nor Nobles nor Commons to be able to discerne betwene night and day besides this I say so shamefull an abuse of a whole Christian nation I would pray them to remember what the most reuerend Fathers Maister Pilkington Maister Iewell haue aunswered to such cavillous slaunders For what els intended they by many examples proofes brought for the Parleamentes of England consisting of the King the Nobles and the Commons to be lawfull Parleaments and to haue right to establish religion but to iustifie against Popish scoffers that religion might be receyued established in Parleament notwithstandinge the absence or exclusion of the Clergie Besides since our lawes do vphold the state authoritie of the Convocation Matters of religion not concluded in Parleament before the same bee consulted of in conuocation house for the examination of all causes of Religion surely it can not be truely averred that it is necessarie for Evangelicall Bishops to be members of the Parleament house least controversie of religion should be handled and discussed without them For how should any matter of religion bee concluded without them in Parleament when first of all the same is to be argued among them selves in convocation or let them hardely if they can shew any one instance of any change or alteratiō either from religion to superstition or from superstitiō to religion to haue bin made in Parleament vnlesse the same freely at large haue bene first agreed vppon in their Synodes and Convocations And what booteth it then to haue a double or treble consultation and consent of Archbishops Bishops in Parleament Is the holy cause of God any whit bettered by their Bishops riding from Paules to Westminster Or can it receiue any more strength by their walking from Westminster Church to Westminster Pallace Nay it hath bene oftentimes so farr from being promoted by their Bishops as not onelie in their convocations but also in the Queenes Parleaments the same hath ben shamefully intreated and taken the foile as may witnesse the bill for the better observation of the Sabboth 27. Eliz. which beeing passed by both houses of Parleament was notwithstanding gainesaid withstood by none so much as by certayne Evangelicall Bishops which as there all men generallie conceaved was onlie stayed from being made a law by the Queene vpon their counsell and perswasion Admonition It hath bene alwayes dangerous to pick quarels against lawes setled Pag. 78. Assertion And is it not morbus hereditarius in Steuen Gardeners argument and the Admonitors argumēt in effect one Prelates to picke quarrels against reformation of errours For even this did Steven Gardener reason against the Lord Protector That in no case sayth Steuen Gardener is to bee attempted of the Lord Protector which may bring both danger to him and trouble to the whole Realme But innovation of Religion from that state wherein King Henry left it may bee and is like to bee dangerous to the Lord protector to breed troubles to the whole Realme Therefore innouation of Religion from the state that King Henry left it is in no wise to be attempted And even of this stāpe of this streyne is the argument of picking quarrelles against lawes settled for thus in effect he argueth That Discipline in no case is to bee brought into the Church by the Kinge Parleament which may be dangerous to lawes setled But to bring into the Church the Apostolicall discipline may bee dangerous to lawes setled Therefore the Apostolicall Discipline in no case is to bee brought into the Church by the King Parleament But forasmuch as that noble and religious Lord Protector notwithstanding Steven Gardiners sophistrie continued constant and couragious in the abolishment of Poperie and superstition which King Henrie left did without dangerous alterations of lawes then settled innovate religion How much more now may the Kings Maiestie the Lesse dāger to reforme the Church by newe lawes then to continue corruptiō by old lawes Lords and Commons in Parleament attempt with effect an innovation of that state of Ecclesiasticall goverment wherin the Queene left the Church And if it can not be denied but it had bene farre more daungerous for the Realme and for the Lord protector not to haue setled the holy doctrine of the everlasting Gospel by new lawes then to haue mainteyned and continued antichristianitie by old lawes how should it bee lesse danger for the King in these dayes to continue corruptions in the Church by tolleration of old lawes then to haue the same corruptions reformed by establishment of new lawes But vnto whō or vnto what hath it bene daungerous to picke quarrelles against lawes setled What Hath it bene dangerous to lawes setled No. For how should lawes setled be indangered by quarelers sithence quarellers are euermore in daunger of lawes settled Or hath it bene alwayes dangerous for a King for a State for a people or for a Countrey to picke quarelles against lawes setled No. For what man is he or what face carieth he that dare vpbrayde a Countrey a people a State or a King minding to vnsetle evil lawes euill customes to be quarelers against lawes setled Let it then onlie be daungerous for private persons vpon private malecontentment to picke quarelles against good lawes wel rightly setled and let it not be hurtfull or dangerous for supreame Kings powers and Principalities by publicke edicts to alter evill lawes evilly setled For to what other end should evill lawes evilly setled
be continued but to continue evill And what a thing were that This argument then for lawes setled being the sophisme of that Fox Steven Gardener is but a quarelsome and wrangling argument Admonition If this goverment whereof they Pag. 7◠speake be as they say necessarie in all places then must they haue of necessitie in everie particular parish one Pastor a companie of Seniors and a Deacon or two at the least al those to be found of the parish because they must leaue their occupations to attende vpon the matters of the Church But there are a number of Parishes in England not able to finde one tollerable Minister much lesse to find such a companie Assertion This argument seemeth to be drawne from kitchin profite and is but a bugbegger to scarr covetous men from submitting their neckes vnto the yoke of that holy Discipline which our Savior Christ hath prescribed and which the Admonitor himselfe confesseth to haue bene practised by the Apostles and primitive Church And yet because this argument seemeth to lay a very heavie burden on mens shoulders such as is impossible to be borne it is an argumēt That Seniours Deacons should be found at the charge of the Parish is absurd worthy to bee examined though in it selfe the same be very vntrue absurd For who did ever fancie that a Pastour a company of Seniours and a Deacon or two at the least should be men of occupations or that they should be all found of the parish because they must leaue their occupations to attend vpon the matters of the Church Why there be many hūdreths of parishes in England wherein there dwelleth not one man of an occupation And what reason then or likelihood of reason was there to father such an absurd necessitie vpon the Church As for the necessitie of having one Pastour in every particular parish and of his finding by the parish because it is his duety to attend vpon reading exhortation doctrine although he be no man of occupation this I say is agreable consonant to the goverment of the church practised by the Bishops And therefore in the finding having of one Pastour in every parish they and we differ not But that men of occupations onelie should bee chosen Seniours and Deacons in every parish or if Seniours and Deacons were men of occupations in any parish that they should bee all found of the parish wee vtterly disclayme as an absurditie of absurdities And yet wee deny not but in Cities and great Townes wherin for the most part men of trade do inhabite that Seniours Deacons must of necessitie be men of occupations Vnlesse then an occupation must of necessitie hinder men from being faithfull religious godly men there is no reason to inforce that mē of occupations in Cities and great townes should not be chosen Seniors and Deacons And as for Countrey parishes What kinde of mē ought to be chosen Seniours Deacons wherein either verie fewe or no men of occupations doe reside this obiection is altogether idle In which parishes also we affirme that men of greatest gravitie integritie wisedome faith and godlines ought to be chosen Seniours and Deacons And we doubt not but all such men as whom we intend ought to bee chosen Seniours and Deacons whether dwelling in Cities Townes or in the Coūtrey would be as readie as willing and as watchfull prudentlie to imploy them selues hereafter in matters of the Church as now either them selues or their equalles are busied in matters of their corporations or common weale without anie maner of contribution to be yeelded towards their finding When the people of Israell were commanded to pay their tythes first fruites and other oblations vnto the Priestes Levites for their attendance and service in the Sāctuarie we doe not reade in the whole booke of God that they were inioyned to be helpers and cōtributors to the reliefe and sustentation of the Captaynes over thousands of the Captaines over hundreds nor of the Elders Governours placed Citie by Citie for the affaires of the King And therefore sithence we haue neither precept nor president that all the officers of the church should bee founde at the costes of the Church and sithence also as well in Coūtrey parishes as in Cities townes to the prayse and glorie of God be it spoken we haue many able wealthie substantiall persons who haue giuen their names vnto Christ what necessitie is there that any such Seniours and Deacons should be elected as haue need to be relieved and supported by a common purse And had the Admonitor wel and advisedlie pōdered that our Church Church wardens side men are not found at the chardges of the parishes Wardens side men who carie a semblance of governing Seniours that our collectors also for the poore who iustle out the Deacons being all of them men of occupations poore husbandmen or day labourers and being not founde of the parish are notwithstandinge oftentimes in the yere troubled and turmoyled from one end of the Diocesse vnto the other and that which is more from attendance vpon their day labour husbandrie and occupations to weight and to attend not vpō matters of the church but vpon money matters perteyning to the officers of the Bb. Consistorie Had he I say wiselie and sincerelie considered these things he would certeinlie not once haue mencioned this so sillie and simple a suggestion But quite cleane to cutt of at one blow all the skirtes of the coat of this sillie bulbegger that the verie buttockes of it may bee bare and that the church may see there is no such burdensome charge to bee layde vpon her as is feyned the graue and godlie iudgement and policie of King Edward The iudgemēt of King Ed. the sixt cōmissioners touching Elders and Deacons the sixt his Commissioners authorized to compile a booke for the reformatiō of lawes ecclesiasticall according to an Act of Parleament in that behalfe provided shall rise vp for vs and pleade the trueth and equitie of this our sayinges The Commissioners names were these viz. The most reverend Father Thomas Crammer Archbishoppe of Canterburie Thomas Bishoppe of Ely Richard Cox the Kings Almoner Peter Martyr professor of Divinitie William May Rowland Taylor Doctors of the Lawe Sir Iohn Cheeke Iohn Lucas Richard Goddericke Maister Hadon and others All Titul de diuiois officijs cap. 10. fol. 45. which reverend learned and religious men as with one voyce accord speak one thing so thus and thus they speake Evening prayer being finished wherevnto all shal be attēdant after sermon in their owne Churches the chief minister whom they call Parochies and the Deacon if happely they shal be present or they being absent let the Ministers Vicars and Elders lo the Archb. of of Cāterburie afterwards a godlie Martyr and Bishoppes can skill of the name of Deacon and Elders with the people conferr about the money put apart to
subversion vpō any nation that purely and soundly in place therof hath embraced the holy Sacrament of the Lords Supper It seemeth also to be equal for many ages past that the Bishop of Rome might haue supreame and absolute power over all persons states and causes not only in Rome Italy Spaigne Germany other forraigne Kingdoms but also in England and Scotland But as yet to the view of al the world it hath not proved perilous for the King Queen of England and Scotland to establish new lawes for the alteration of that ancient abuse And why hath it not bene dangerous so to do Why forsooth because there was evident vtilitie in doing of it But how could an evident vtilitie appeare before it was done How Forsooth because the holy law of God had warranted an alteration For faith having eyes to see the wisedom the power and the trueth of God in his word discerned a far of that the institution of the Lords Supper was long before the sacrifice of the masse And therefore our Kings by abandoning popery out of the Realme did not institute any new religion but onely they restored the old Now then if the same holy lawe of God doe condemne the choyce and thrusting of a Pastour vpon the people by one man alone and againe if the same lawe doe impugne the primacie of one Pastour over all Pastours as wel in a Diocesse or Province as in the whole West part of Christendome what daunger can it be not to disfrāchise the one sithence without any maner of danger we haue abolished the other or what perill can it be not to countenance the sonnes sithence without peril we haue discountenanced the father Especially seeing in this place of the admonition we haue a playne cōfession that the common maner of election of Pastors Elders and Deacons in the old Churches was made by the people For if the examples of schisme discord Common manner of elections in the olde churches was by the people contention did commonly appeare in the olde churches while that maner of election did continue then by his owne mouth that maner of election was common and did continue in the olde churches Besides this inconvenience saith he caused Princes Bishops so much to entermedle in this matter From whence it necessarily againe followeth that by the holy Scriptures and law of God Princes and Bishops did not entermedle with that matter at all For had it bin simply lawful for thē to haue Bb. medle not with election of Pastours by the holie Scriptures dealt in those causes by the worde of God thē as well before schisme discord and dissention as afterward yea rather much more before then afterward For then by their own right might Princes and Bishops haue prevented all occasion of schisme and contention and haue so preserved the Church that no tumult or disorder should once haue bin raysed or begun therein Againe if by the lawe of God Princes Bishops had medled in these matters and had not entermedled by humane devise then lawfully by their authoritie alone might they haue chosen Pastours Elders and Deacons in the olde Churches which thing in this place by necessarie inference he denieth For schisme saith he caused thē to entermedle So as by his confession they were but entermedlers and entercommoners by reason of schisme not cōmoners and medlers by vertue of Gods word And yet now a dayes our reverend Bishops in this case are no more entercommoners with Princes and with the people they are no more entermedlers as in olde times they were but they haue now so farre encroched vpon the prerogatiues of the Prince and privileges of the people that neither Prince Bishops encroch vpon the right of prince and people nor people haue any commons in the election of Pastours Elders Deacons with them at all Besides if schisme and contention among the people were the reason why Bishops first entermedled in the choise of Pastours we now having no schisme nor contention about the choise of Pastours by the people and so the cause ceasing why should not the effect likewise cease But this effect is therefore still to be continued because otherwise the cause would a new sprout out and spring vp againe Nay rather inasmuch as for these many yeares we haue had schisme discord dissention because the Bishops wholy and altogether haue medled in the choise of Pastours and haue thrust vpon the people whatsoever Pastours please not the people but pleased themselves haue not suffered the people to medle no not so much as once to entermedle in these matters in as much I say as these things be so it seemeth most expediēt requisite necessarie for the appeasing pacifying of this discord the taking away of this schisme to haue that maner of election which was in the old Churches restored to the people and this wherein the Bishops haue entermedled without authoritie from the worde to be abolished that so againe the cause of schisme and strife which is now among vs ceasing the effect might likewise cease After I had ended this tract in this maner touching this poynt there came into mine handes a booke intituled The perpetuall gouernment of Christes church written by Thomas Bilson Warden of Winchester Colledge in the fifteenth chapter of which booke is handled this question viz to whom the election of Bishoppes and Presbiters doth rightlie belong and whether by Gods lawe the people must elect their Pastours or no. In whiche Chapter also the matter of schisme strife and contention is handled The finall scope and conclusion whereof is as the proposition importeth two fold First cōcerning Bishops then concerning Pastours The quarell taken against Bishoppes doth not so much touch sayth he the office and functions of Bishoppes as it doth the Princes prerogatiue When you rather thinke the Prince may not name her Bishoppes without the consent and election of the people you impugne nor vs but directlie call the Princes fact and her lawes in question As touching this poynt of the proposition because the people by any lawe or custome never chalenged anie right or interest in the choyse of the Kings Bishoppes we haue nothing to medle or to make about the choyse of any of his Kinglie Bishoppes The Kinge only hath power without the people to nominate his Kingly Bb. Nay we confesse as his Highnes progenitours Kings of England haue bin the Soveraigne Donours Founders Lords and Avowes of all the Bishoprickes in England without ayd of the people that so likewise it is a right and interest invested into his Imperiall Crowne that he onely his heyres successours without cōsent of the people ought to haue the free nomination appointment collation investiture and confirmation of all Bishoppes frō time to time to be placed in anie of those Bishoprickes yea we say further that the King alone hath not power onely to nominate collate confirme but also to
translate yea and if it please him to depose all his Kingly Bishoppes without anie cōsent of his people at all For say we eius est destruere cuius est construere eius est tollere cuius est condere Neither will we dislike but rather content our selues that our late Queenes Bishoppes if they shall finde fauour in the Kings eyes should be also the Kings Bishoppes condicionallie they submit them selues to the lawes prerogatiues of the Kings Crowne content themselues with the only name of Kinglie and Princelie Bishoppes not challenge anie more the titles of Godly and Christian Bishoppes as though without iniurie to the law of God and Gospell of our Savior Christ they could not be dispossessed of their Lordlie Bishoprickes And therefore our most humble prayer to the King is that his Maiestie would be pleased that such his Kingly Bishops may not henceforth overcrow and iustle our Gods Bishoppes nor haue any primacie over Gods Bishoppes And withall that the King him self would vouchsafe to hearken to the doctrine of such as are in deed Gods Bishoppes rather thē to the Counsel of those who lately were the Queenes Bishoppes As touching the second part viz. whether Mai. Bilson confirmeth the peoples election of their Pastour Pag. 339. the people by Gods lawe must elect their Pastours or no Maister Bilson by reasons and profes brought for the first vse of it rather confirmeth then impugneth the same For saith he Well may the peoples interest stande vppon the groūds of reason and nature and be deriued from the rules of Christian equitie and societie That each Church and people stand free by Gods law to admit mainteyne or obey no man as their Pastour without their likinge vnlesse by law custome or consent they haue restreyned them selues That the people 360. had as much right to choose their Pastour as the Clergie that had more skill to iudge That the Apostles left elections indifferenthe to the people Clergie at Ierusalem That the Apostles in the Actes when they willed the Church at Ierusalem to chose the seuen did not make anie remembrance or distinction of the seuentie Disciples from the rest And lastlie against the cursing fighsting of the late Bishoppes of Rome till 359. excluding both Prince and people from yeelding his consent or making their request they had reduced the election wholie to the Clergie he telleth them by their leaue it was not so from the beginning From all which sayinges of Maister 339. Bilson I conclude thus Whatsoeuer is right lawfull and free by the lawe of God whatsoeuer standeth vpon the groundes of reason and nature whatsoeuer is deriued frō Christian equity and society whatsoeuer is from the beginning and was left by the Apostles to the Church at Ierusalem the same ought still to remayne and must bee kept inviolable in the Church But the peoples interest to choose their Pastore is right is lawfull is free by the lawe of God standeth vppon the grounds of reason and nature is aeriued from Christian equity society is from the beginning and was left by the Apostles to the church at Ierusalem Therefore the peoples interest to choose their Pastoure ought still to remayne and must bee kept inuiolable in the Church The whole proposition and euery part thereof together with the assumpt and euery part thereof is drawen from Mr Bilsons owne confession Onely to the proposition hee hath annexed certeyne condicions or exceptions viz. Vnlesse by law custome or consent the people haue restreyned themselues or transferred or altered their right or els by their default or abuse the canons counsels superior powers princely or publicke lawes haue abridged altered or abrogated the same Now then it remayneth to know whether any consent default abuse custome canons counsels superiour powers publike or Princely Edicts may bee a good and sure warrant to abridge transferr or abrogate the peoples interest from hauing to doe in the choyse of their Pastours Our Sauiour Christ whē he came in the flesh he came to reforme the abuse crept in of the Law and to improue the corruptions of doctrine taught by the Scribes Pharisies and Doctors of the lawe but hee tooke not away any least title of the law ne abolished any iote of true sound doctrine in the Church The Gospell teacheth vs to order our iudgements aright to bridle the vnrulines of our affections to moderate our inordinate appetites But yet doth not the same commaund vs to empty our soules of all iudgement to bury our affections in our bellies and to become as dead as stones without all sense or appetite In like sort wee graunt that custome consent Canons Coūcills Superiour powers publick princely Laws Canons and coūsells c. may bridle disordered electiōs but not disannul elections of the people altogether may reforme reproue restreyne direct moderate and bridle the disordered vnrulines and contentious brawlinges of the people in and about their elections yea and wee graunt further that they may alter abridge or enlarge the forme and manner of elections All this wee graunt but that Christian Kings or any Superiour powers may take this right into their owne handes as hee sayeth from the people or that the people by anie lawe custome consent canon or coūcill may transferre or abolite their right freedome and interest giuen and deduced vnto them by these rules and by these groundes I do not yet perceiue anie good groūd or reason for the same For in so doing howe should the holy wisedome and providence of God who hath imprinted in our nature these rules and these grounds this equitie and this freedome be so holily regarded and so highly reverenced as it ought to be For hath he made vs free men and can wee without contempt of this grace become bondmen Hath he given vs leaue and libertie to choose shall we with prophane Esau sett litle by this our birth-right and post our libertie vnto others for lesse then a messe of wort pottage And albeit in some cases that may bee well saide quod volenti non fit iniuria and that quilibet potest recedere 〈◊〉 suo iure yet the cases must bee such as a mans willingnes and readines to forgoe his right bee not tyed to him with so strong a bande as is the bande of the groundes of reason and nature of the rules of Christian equitie of the freedome of the lawe of God It is free I graunt for a man to eate or not to eate to drinke or not to drink but for a man not to eate at all or not to drinke at all and so with hunger and thirst to sterue him selfe is not free and in this case volenti sit iniuria Euery man that hath a wife that hath sonnes and daughters that hath men-servantes and mayd-servantes as by the verie instinct of nature and by rhe equitie of the lawe of Christ he hath freedome to provide for them so must hee
became followers of the evill maners of their teachers and no merveile if they verified the proverbe Like Maister like Man like Priest like People Eustatius Bishop of Antioch being a Sabellian hereticke Socr. lib. cap â—8 was deposed by the Counsell of Antioch after whose deposition a fiery flame of seditioÌ„ was kindled in Antioch because one sort of the common people sought to translate Eusebius Pamphilus from Caesarea to Antioch some other would bring againe Eustatius Eusebius Bishop of Nicomedia and Theognis Bishop of Nice beeing both Arians with their coÌ„federates raised skirmishes Socr. lib. 2. cap. 2. and tumults against Athanasius After the death of Alexander Bishop op Constantinople about the electioÌ„ of a Bishop there was greater sturre then ever before time and the Church was more greevously turmoyled The people were devided into two parts the one egerlie set with the heresie of Arius claue to Macedonius the other cleaved very coÌ„stantlie Socr. lib. 2 cap. 4. to the decrees of the Nicene Counsell and choose Paulus to bee their Bishop The cause of division among the Citizens of Emisa about the election of Eusebius Emisenus was for that he was Socr. lib. 2. cap. 6 charged with the studie of the Mathematickes and accused of the heresie of Sabellius After the death of Eusebius when the people of Constantinople had brought againe Paulus to be their Bishop the Arians chose Macedonius The authours and chiefe doers in that sturre were certaine Arian Bishops who before ayded Eusebius that turned vp Socr. lib. cap. 9. side down the whole state of the church These and sundry such like sturres discords factions dissentions are found to haue bin raised pursued by schismaticall and heretical Bishops their favourites followers in the olde Churches but that these or the like mischieves and inconveniences can be proved to haue fallen out by the election of parochiall Pastours in the olde churches we deny And why then should not the interest and freedome of faithfull Christian people wrested from them by cursings and fightings of faithlesse and antichristian Popes be restored to them againe And the cause ceasing why should not the effect likewise cease And therefore we humbly intreate the Lords Bishops that against the grounds of reason and nature against Christian equitie A request to the reuerend Bishoppes and society against the right freedome of the lawe of God against the principles of humaine fellowshippes against that which was in the beginning and against that which the Apostles left in the Churches by colour of lawes brought into the Church by the cursings and fightings of the late Romane Bishops they would not hencefoorth barre seclude the Kings Christian and faithfull people from giving their consents vnto their Pastours Yea and we further beseech their Lordships that as schollers vnto the Apostles and as servants vnto the olde way of reason of nature of the law of God of the equitie of Christ and of humane societie they would hereafter imbrace that way which was from the beginning which is the old way and the best way and not any loÌ„ger persist in a cursed and quareling way which is the new way and the worst way But if the Lordes spirituall A supplication to bee King by the Lords and commoÌ„s for the restitution of their right in the choyse of their Pastors of their owne accord shall not readily voutchsafe to yeelde vnto vs this our right at our intreaty then for my part I will briefly shew mine opinion what were expedient for the Lords and commons in open Parleament dutifully to pray and to supplicate at the Kings Maiestes hande Namely At the humble petitions and supplications of all his Lords temporall and Commons in Parleament assembled his Maiestie would be well pleased to giue his Royall assent to an Act to be intituled An Act for the restitution of the auncient right and freedome which the people of God in the old Churches had and which the people in England ought to haue in to or about the election of their Pastours and abolishing all papall power repugnant to the same For if as it is plainlie confessed the people of all Churches haue right and freedome by the law of God by the equitie of Christ by the grounds of reason and nature by the principles of humane fellowshipps and by that which was from the beginning to elect their Pastours and if also the same right and freedome being left to the old churches and especially to the Church at Ierusalem by the Apostles haue bene taken away by the cursings and fightings of the late Bishoppes of Rome then can not the people without violatioÌ„ of those lawes rules grouÌ„ds by any Episcopall power bee anie more excluded from their said right and freedome then could or might the ancient iurisdiction of the Crowne of England haue bene still vsurped by the Pope froÌ„ the Kings of Englande Admonition But alas the common people of Englande thorough affection and want of right iudgement are more easily wrought by ambitious persons to giue their consent to vnworthie men as may appeare in all those offices of gayne or dignity that at this daye remayne in the choyse of the multitude Assertion The Admonitor in one place of his admonition telleth vs that he must not put all that he thinketh in writing and yet he writeth in this place that thinge which might farre better haue bene vtterly vnthought then once written For could he thinke to winne the common people of England to a continuall good liking of high and stately Prelacie by vpbrayding and charging them to their faces in a booke dedicated vnto them with affection and wantinge of right iugement Was this the way to procure grace favour and benevolence at their handes And albeit this slaunder deserued rather to haue bene censured by the Commons in Parleament then by confutation to haue bene answered yet for the better clearing of the right iudgement of the common people givinge their consents to most worthie men in all offices of gayne or dignitie remayning in their handes I thinke it necessarie to shew the indignitie of this contumelie There be I confesse in London Yorke Lincolne Bristow Exceter Norwich Coventry and other principall Cities and Townes corporate Mayors Sheriffes Stewardes Recorders Baylifes ChaÌ„berlaynes Bridge-maisters Clerks Swordbearers Knightes Burgeses and such like offices some of dignitie and some of gayne but that the officers of these or any other places whether of dignitie or gaine be chosen by the multitude of those places is vtterlie vntrue for onely accordinge to their auncient customes priviledges and Charters by the chiefe Citizens Townsmen and Borough-maisters are those officers chosen The number also of which Electors in all places is not alike In London the Aldermen choose the Lord Mayor In other Cities and Townes sometimes eight and fortie sometimes fourteene sometimes twelfe sometimes only such as haue born office as Mayors Sherifes or Baylifes in the same places
shall bee intreated so that the man be amended who hath caried himselfe outragiously both in that and other thinges And so referring the whole matter to your graces discretion I take my leaue praying God to blesse vs in the peace of the Church From c. the 17. of October c. Your gra most assured in Christ c. Whatsouer speciall cause might moue these two great Prelates to stand eyther of them for the defence of his kinsmā is not a thing materiall to this treatise But this honestly inough may be averred that it was no very good or moderate kind of ecclesiasticall discipline eyther for the Archb. and his associates in regard of his kinsman presented to a benefice by the gentlemā to cancell the articles of his colleague fellow commissioners or for the Bb. vpon a splene taken against the gentleman for standing vpon the right of his patronage against his kinsman to violate the publicke orders of the high cōmissioners wherevnto he him selfe had subscribed Many other formes of ecclesiasticall discipline of late yeares haue bene vsed by the high cōmissioners But whether they were all very good and moderate disciplines or no is greatly doubted by many wise learned and godly men And namely it is doubted whether such ecclesiasticall cōmissioners as by letters patents vnder the great Seale of England were authorised from the Queene to exercise vse occupie and execute all manner of iurisdictions priviledges preheminences concerning any spirituall or ecclesiasticall iurisdiction bee able to prooue vnto the Realme that they had lawfull power and authoritie by the statute of 1. Eliz. c. 1. or by the Queenes letters patents made according to the true intent of that statute or by any other lawe or statute of the Realme to depute and substitute any other person vnder them to vse exercise and execute any part of that iurisdiction ecclesiastical which by vertue of that statute letters patentes was cōmitted onlie to their fidelities discretions And whether it were a very good maner of ecclesiast discipline which was vsed exercised executed eyther by the person so deputed or by the Cōmissioners them selues vpon any processe or proceedings made by the said person substituted Agayne it is doubted whether it were a good manner of ecclesiasticall discipline for Ecclesiasticall discipline against the Magistrats of Banbury the high Commissioners to commaund the Magistrats of the Town of Banbury at the suite of certaine Popish companions to reset vp a Crosse which by vertue of the Queenes iniunctions they had peaceably and lawfully pulled downe It is also doubted whether it were a very good maner of Ecclesiasticall discipline for the high Commissioners to deteyne Maister More one yeare or two in prison depriving him also from his living for his cōfident asseveration that William Sommers with divers others in Lanchashire were possessed and that Maister Dorrell was not an impostor The occasion of the Admonitors great commendation of a very good maner of ecclesiastical discipline vsed by the high Cōmissioners hath necessarily drawen me to shew the differences of the disciplines vsed by the same To the intent the Kinges Highnes might be pleased with the advise of his Parleament to cōsult whether it were not more agreeable to the good lawes statutes and customes of the Realme and more convenient for the good governement of the Church to haue one certeyne forme rule of ecclesiasticall discipline to bee established and to be vsed by the high Commissioners rather then thus at randome to suffer their onely discretion to be the Mistres of all maner of ecclesiasticall discipline especially sithence without any maner of appeale or supplication to be made frō them vnto the King they vse what manner of discipline soever seemeth good in their owne eyes whether moderate or immoderate civill or ecclesiastical without checke or controlement Then the which there can not seeme any thing more preiudiciall and burdensome vnto the people Admonition Furthermore their whole drift as it may seeme is to bring the goverment Pag. 82. of the church to a Democracie or Aristocracie the principles reasons whereof if they be made once by experience familiar in the minds of the common people and that they haue the sence and feeling of them it is greatly to bee feared that they will very easely transferre the same to the gouerment of the common weale For by the same reasons they shall bee induced to thinke that they haue iniury if they haue not as much to doe in civill matters as they haue in matters of the Church seeing they also touch their commoditie and benefit temporally as the other doeth spiritually and what hereof may follow I leaue to the iudgement of other Assertion Let it be graunted that their whole drift is to bring the government of the Church to that manner of government which the learned cal Aristocracie what incommoditie should the Church or cōmon weale receyur by such a govermēt when as the same goverment is not onlie authorised by the holy lawe of God but also commended vnto vs by the desires Book of cōmon prayer title cōmunation and cōfirmed by 5. and 6. Ed. 6. c. 1. prim Eliz. c. 2. 8. Eliz. c. 1. Aristocracie in the church not hurtfull to the common wealth and wishes of sundrie Actes of Parleaments For sayth the booke of common prayer the Discipline of the primitiue church is greatly to be wished Aristocracie therefore and the discipline of the primitiue Church differing but in name and not in nature it can not bee hurtfull to the common weale that the principles and reasons thereof should by experiēce be made familiar in the minds of the common people nay it can not but be beneficial vnto the cōmon weale when the same shal vnderstand that the best observers of the law of God the best friendes vnto God and his people are to bee the Officers in the house of God Neyther is their whole drift to be disliked but to be commended that labour to bringe the government of the church from a Papal Prelacie to a christian Aristocracie the one viz. Aristocracie Aristocracie in the Church optimarum Prelacia pessimarum potestas accordinge to the interpretation of the name thereof being optimatum potestas a power of the best observers of the lawe the other viz. Prelacie according to their practise being pessimatum potestas a power of the worst observers of the law the first derived from the law of God practise of Gods people the other deduced from the lawes and customes of the Gentiles and idolatrous Priestes And this of necessitie in defence of the trueth the Admonitors argument forceth me to speake for by an implicatiō of the dislike of bringing the government of the Churches by Pastors and Elders to a Democracie or Aristocracie he hath by consequence disclaymed and disavowed the goverment of the Church by Prelacie to be anie of those two And what other government then
should we think Prelacie to be but eyther Oligarchie or Tyrannie For neither Monarchie may it be neyther Pollicie Prelacie either Oligarchie or tyrannie or polliticall estate can it be and other kinde of government besides these there is not anie For my part I more charitably iudge of the government of the Church by Prelacie then to match it with Tyrannie And although the Admonitor and the Pervsers and allowers of his booke were men in their generation wise yet had they well weighed the nature of the goverment of Oligarchie they would rather in this argumēt haue bin silent then vpon disclayme of Democracie and Aristocracie goverments both of them commendable in their kinde haue cast the commendation of their owne goverment of the Church by Prelacie to so desperat an estate as is the estate of Oligarchie Wherein if any doe glorie because not many of the best but some fewe of the wealthiest and richest sort doe governe then lett him hearken and cōsider what long since was preached before Pope Vrban the fifte by Act. Mo. one Nicolas Orem a man singularly commended for learning in his time Nicholas Orem his opinion of Oligarchie Amongst all the regiments of the Gentiles none saith he is more to be found wherein is to bee seene so great and exceeding ods thē in the policie of Priests Amongst whom one is drunken another is sterved amongst whom some be so high that they exceed all Nobles Princes of the Earth some againe be so abased that they are vnder all rascalls and such a common weath saith hee may well bee called Oligarchie But Thomas Aquinas he seemeth to set the discommodities of Oligarchie a pinne Thomas Aquinas what hee thinketh of Oligarchie higher for saith hee as a Kingdome hath in it the commodities of all other good regiments of Aristocracie that the Noblest and chiefest persons among Aristocracie a good regiment the people be taken to Councell of Policie or politicall estate where an assemblie of all estates is had whē the very best of all sorts are chosen to consult and deliberate of the publique weale so doeth Tyrannie conteine and hath in it all incommodities and vices of all naughtie corrupt regiments of Oligarchie it borroweth that the most wicked Oligarchie a corrupt regiment corruptest men be Counsaylors that as it were a route of Tyrants doe govverne The reasons and pillers of which Oligarchie are immoderatnes excessivenes disparitie and inequalitie passing and beyond all meane and measure Now if our reverend Bb. shall shew them selues to bee mal-contented with mee as though out of the opinions of these learned men I would gather that the governement of the Church by Prelacie is one of the corruptest governements I am to desire them to haue patience vntill they shall plainly demonstrate vnto vs that the same is not Oligarchie For if hereafter they shall revoke their former disgraceful iudgmēts against the discipline by Pastors and Elders conteyning in it the very nature of true Aristocracie and withall instruct vs better of the true nature of their own governement of the Church by Prelacie they shall finde vs plyable to their opinion so that it be grounded vpon the principles and reasons of trueth In the meane season after the fashion of the Admonitors maner of admonishing the people wee most humbly beseech the King and Parleament to bee enformed that it is greatly to be feared if Prelacie be Oligarchie that the Prelates will endevour It is to bee feared least by the exāple of Prelates Oligarchie bee brought in the common weale to transferre that maner of goverment frō the Church vnto the common weale And that the cōmon weale shall as miserably be rent torne with factions vproares as now the church is disquieted by schismes and divisions For if only a few of the richest and welthiest sort shal get an head and beare all the sway in the cōmon weale they shall thinke by the principles and reasons of Oligarchie that they haue iniury if they haue not as much to do in civil matters as the Prelats haue to doe in the matters of the Church And what hereof may follow as the Admonitor leaveth so doe I also leaue it to the iudgement of other Onelie if the way hereof alreadie hath bin troden out vnto them by some who A caueat against Oligarchie haue not written nor spoken but yet practised the principles and reasons of Oligarchie in the common weale onelie then this I say and adde as a caveat that the daunger to come is more heedefully to be prevēted For like as in good harmonie to make the Musike perfaict is required a moderate proportionate inequalitie of voyces which if it too much exceed taketh away all the sweet melodie so by too much immoderate inequalitie or disparitie of Citizens the common weale falleth to ruine But why may not the governement of the The gouerment of the Church by Prelacie is not Monarchicall Church by Prelacie be a Princely and a Royall governement In deed this question if it should be resolued by the rules and principles of the canon law I could hardly disproue that government to be Princelike for as hath bin saide before quilibet Ordinarius in sua Diocoesi est maior quolibet Principe Yea and every Bishop by the same lawe hath as absolute a spirituall power within his Diocesse as a Kinge hath a temporall power within his Kingdome But because that law with the rules principles thereof is or ought to be discarded out of this Kingdome we will not wade in it Only we say that the governement of the Church by Prelacie cannot bee any kinde of Royall and Monarchicall governement because Prelates haue not like power spirituall as Kings and Monarches haue power rēporall For there was never yet lex regia de Prelatorum spirituali imperio lata qua Prelatis Institut de iure natur gent ci § Sed quod in eos omne imperium suum potestatem aut Deus aut populus Dei contulerit And therfore where the people haue made the fore said regall law as there it is iustly said quodcunque Imperator per epistolam constituit vel cognoscens decreuit vel edicto praecepit legem esse constat and quod Principi placuit legis habet vigorem So likewise where there is no such regall law made in the church there it is as iustly affirmed quod Prelato placuit legis non habei vigorem quodcunque Prelatus per epistolam constituit cognoscens decrevit vel canone praecepit legem non esse constat And then how can every Prelate or why doth everie Prelate by his sole authoritie inioyne canons articles iniunctions and orders to be observed as lawes in all the Churches of his iurisdiction If the Admonitor supposed the governement If the gouvernment of the Church by Prelacie bee Monarchicall thē may the government by Pastors be
represse Puritanes in one Parish then Maister D. Stanhope alone to represse all in a Diocesse in Holborne and that hee had chosen Maister Harsnet to bee his Curat and withall that Mai. Dodge Ma. Merbury Maister Flower and Maister Brisket all cheefe attendants on his late great Lord and Maister were inhabitants within the same Parish that the chiefe men of the same Parish had chosen those to be assistants to him and to his Curat for the inquisition of the demeanours of all the Puritanes and Precisians within his Parish let this I say bee supposed would not hee and they trow wee thinke it a high scorne and an indignitie to be offered vnto their Maisterships in case it should bee insinuated that Maister Doctor Stanhope were better able with one litle blast of breath vpon a peece of paper to blow away all Puritanisme out of the Citie and Diocesse of London then these great Chaplins and discrete gentlemen with their thundrings and with their lightnings were able to fright the same out of one poore Parish in Holborn And againe to make this matter yet a litle more familiar to the minde of the Reader let vs suppose againe that thundering Mai. Merburie now Lecturer in in the church of Saint Mary Oâ—eris were Pastor of the same church had to be his assistants in the Ministery but simple M. ButtertoÌ„ that they two for the Elders of the same Church to be chosen by the Parish had such and such and such and such men louers of all honestie and godlines and enemies vnto all dishonestie and vngodlines could not these learned and graue Ministers with the assistants of such wise godly Borough-maisters be as well able to reforme Papists Atheists swearers prophaners of the Sabaoth Drunkerds adulterers and such like within the Borough of Southwark as is Maister Doctor Ridley to bring to any good amendement of life all such kind of persons within the whole Diocesse of Winchester If the examination and iudgement of all theeueries pickeries burglaries robberies murders and such like were committed to Maister Doctor Ridley alone for the Diocesse of Winchester and to Maister D. Stanhope alone for the Diocesse of London were it not like that for one such malefactor as there is now we should shorthly haue an hundred And therefore to hold vs still to the point in question it is very plaine and euident that this manner of spirituall Iustice mentioned to be executed by the Pastors and Elders is more correspondent to the administration of civill Iustice in the common weale then is that manner of the execution of spirituall Iustice by Doctor Stanhope or Doctor Ridley by the Bishop of LondoÌ„ or by the Bishoppe of Winchester For to begin with our meanest and basest Courts let theÌ„ shew vnto vs any Court Leete Law-days or Sherifs turnes within Matters in Leets and Lawdayes not ouerruled by one alone any Countie Citie Towne Borough Village or Hamblet within the Realme wherin matters of civil Iustice are heard examined and adiudged by one man alone If for the common benefit of the Tenants against incrochmeÌ„ts ouerlaying of coÌ„mons wast nuisances or such like any payne is to bee offered or presentment made the same is not set or made by the Steward Sherif or other Officer alone but by the commoÌ„ voice and consent of all the homagers and suitors to the Court The Steward indeed is the director and moderator of the Court the giuer of the charge and the mouth of the whole assembly to pronounce and enact the whole worke of their meeting but he is not the only inquisitor the presentor the informer or the Iudge to dispose all things according to his owne discretion Besides matters of the Kings peace are not committed in any Countie or other place within the Realme only to one Iustice of the peace alone For neither at the generall Breaches of the Kinges peace not punishable by one alon Sessions of the peace nor at any other lesse publike meetings any person for any offence whereof he standeth indighted or for which he is punishable can be fined amerced or bodily punished at the discretion of one Iustice alone but by the greatest part of the Iustices assembled his penaltie is to be imposed vpoÌ„ him Furthermore this manner of the examination of the fact and declaration of the law for the triall of the fact and iudgement of the lawe doth not reside in the brest of one Iuror or Iudge alone In the Courte of the Kings Bench if a prisoner bee brought to the Barre and confesse not the crime Iustice in anie of the B. Courts is not executed by one Iudge alone by the Iustice of that Court hee can receaue no iudgement vnlesse he be first indicted by inquisition of 12. grand Iurors at the least and afterward againe be tried by other 12. brought iudicially into the Court face to face Yea in this Court neither the interpretation of the common law nor the exposition of any statute dependeth vpoÌ„ the opinion credite or authoritie of one Iudge no not of the Kinges chiefe Iustice him selfe alone for his other three brethren and Co-juges varying from him in point of law may lawfully over-rule the Court. The same maner of iudgement for the law is in vse and is practized by the Iudges in the Court of common Pleas and by the Barons of the Exchecquer in the Latin Courte of the Exchecquer And not onely in these Courtes of lawe and In the Courts of Equitie are many assistances Iustice but also in all the Kings Courtes of equitie coÌ„science it is not to be sene that any one person alone hath any absolute power without assistants finally to order iudge and decree any cause apperteining to the iurisdiction of those Courtes In the Courte of Requestes there are not fewer then two Court of Requests yea some times three or fower with Maister of Requestes in commission to heare and determine matters of equitie in that Court. In the Courte of Wardes and liveries there sitteth not onely the Court of Wards Maister of the Wardes but also the Kinges Attorney the Receaver and other Officers of the same Courte In Court of the chequer Chamber the Courte of the Checquer-chamber with the Lord Thresorer who is chiefe and President of that Councell yet with him as assistants doe sit the Chancelor of the Exchequer the Lord chiefe Baron and the other Barons Whatsoever decree finall is made in the Kinges High courte of Chancerie high Courte of Chancerie the same is decreed not by the Lorde Chancelour alone but by the Lord Chancelour and the high Court of Chancerie wherein the Maister of the Roles and the twelfe Maisters of the Chancerie as coadiutors doe sitt and giue assistance In the most honorable Court of Starre-chaÌ„ber the Court of Starre-chaÌ„ber 3. H. 7. c. 1. 21. H. 8. c. 20. Lord Chancelor the Lord Thresaurer and the President of the Kings most
the ordinaries in every Parish for the better retayning of the people in obedience vnto divine service In everie Parish saith the Iniunction three or foure discrete men which tender Gods glorie and his true religion shall be appointed by the ordinaries diligentlie to see that all the parishioners duelie resort vnto their Church vpon all Sundayes and holie dayes and there to continue the whole time of the godlie service And all such as shall be negligent in resorting to the Church having no great or vrgent cause of absence they shall streightlie call vpon them and after due admonition if they ameÌ„d not they shall denounce them to the ordinarie Thus far the iniuction Which that it is not meant of the Church Wardens appeareth by the verie next article for vnto them as is assigned an other name so also another Office That sidemen also are not these kinde of overseers is playne in that they be neither so manie in number as are here required neither chosen by the ordinaries neither yet do they admonish denounce according to this article Wherefore because it is meete that the effect of this Iniunction being religious should bee put in due execution it seemeth a thing verie reasonable and much tending to the honour of the King that his Highnes vnder his letters patents would bee pleased to appoint three foure or more discrete and faithfull persons in everie Parish not onely to performe the effect of this article but also generallie to oversee the life and maners of the people that without great vrgent causes they resorte not vnto Typling-houses or houses of evill note and suspected fame and that vpon the Sabboths they vse no Heathnish dauncing about their disguised May-poles And after due admonition if they amend not to denouÌ„ce them to the Pastor of the place For then might the Pastor be encouraged to giue Book of the forme of ordeining Priestes his faithfull diligence as at the time of his ordination hee solemlie promiseth vnto the Bishop alwayes to Minister the Doctrine and Sacramentes and Discipline of Christ as the Lorde hath commanded by which words inserted in the booke there is a plaine and open confession made by al estates in Parleament that Christe hath not onely established Everie Minister ought to minister the discipline of Christ in his own cure by consent of parleament discipline but a certaine forme of discipline in his Church and that the Pastor to whom the care and charge is committed to teach the people ought to minister the same discipline For it had bene a verie absurd parte for the Parleament to appoint the Bishop to receaue a promise from the Minister to minister the discipline of Christ if Christ had not instituted a Discipline or that the same discipline which he instituted had not in their iudgements belonged vnto the Minister And therefore this verie letter of the booke coÌ„vinceth the whole answere made vnto the abstract touching this point to be verie erroneous frivolous and impertinent to the point in question For whereas in the abstract it is alleaged that the Bishop by vertue of The Minister by promise bindeth himselfe to Minister the discipline of Christ the order and forme appointed by acte of Parleament bindeth the Minister aswell to minister the discipline of Christ within his cure as the doctrine and Sacramentes of Christ as the Lorde hath commaunded c. herevnto first he answereth that these clauses do not dispositively Pag. 55. Pag. 60. ordaine any thing for discipline as though the lawe ment by authoritie hereof to establish that the order in these thinges by the Realme receaved should be holden as agreeablie to the word of God but must be taken enunciatively to declare and affirme that following the order by law established they should doe agreeable to Gods will But alas what repugnancie is there heard for howe Regugnance in the aunswere to the abstract can the law declare and affirme that the Ministers following the order by lawe established shall doe agreeablie to Gods will if the order in these thinges by the Realm receaved should not by the meaning of the law bee holden as agreeable to the word of God What doth the law meane that a man can doe agreeably to Gods will in any thing whiche is not agreeable to his word or if the law haue established an order in the discipline which is not agreeable to Godes worde shall the Ministers do agreeably to Gods will if they follow the Lawe For the meaning of the law is plaine viz. that the Minister by vertue of his promise made to the Bishop shall be no further bound to minister any Doctrine Sacramentes or Discipline receaved by the Realme vnlesse the Realme haue receaved the same according to the coÌ„mandment of God For the ParleameÌ„t having a religious consideration that the Minister of Christ must not haue so much respect what the lawe of the Realme as what the law of God commaÌ„deth carefully provided for his indemnitie in this behalfe Besides what a friuolous comment hath hee made vpon the wordes of the A frivolous comment vppon the wordes of the booâ—e of ordeining Priestes c. booke when he sayth that these wordes of the Bishopp doe not dispositiuely ordeyne any thing for discipline When as the question is not whether the Bb. words but whether the lawe and booke dispose any thing for discipline For the Bishop being but a servaÌ„t to the booke and to the lawe and one vnto whose fidelitie the execution of the law booke is committed though he doe not by his wordes dispose any thing of Discipline yet by his demaunde hee sheweth vnto the Minister that the office of the Ministration of discipline within his cure charge is committed vnto him that by his ordination his person is fully inabled aswell to minister the Discipline as to preach the doctrine of Christ And herevpon also falleth to the ground his other answere as wholie impertinent to the point in questioÌ„ For where he saith that the Lawe meant not by authoritie hereof to establish that the order of these things by the Realme receaved should be holden as agreeable to the worde of God this I saye seemeth wholie to bee impertinent to the purpose of the abstract For there is no such thing insinuated The answer to the abstract wholie impertinent to the point in question to be intended by the statute onely the scope of the Authours drift in that place seemeth to be this viz. That everie Minister by vertue of his promise enioyned by act of Parleament to be made by him and by the office of ministerie taken vpon him at the time of his ordination hath bound him selfe to minister the doctrine sacramentes and discipline of Christ as the Lord hath commaunded And what then if the Lawe The not disposing in perticularitie all rites ceremonies of discipline doeth not hinder the exercise of discipline by the Minister haue not
Archbishop of Canterburie cā haue over nine thirtie or fortie thē me thinketh it a matter very reasonablie of them to bee confessed that all true Pastors whether they bee great Pastors or litle Pastors may lawfullie exercise all maner of such true power spirituall as vnto true spirituall Pastors by the holie scriptures doeth apperteyne For if Bishops being great Pastours may therefore preach minister the Sacraments because they be as they say true Pastors thē also may litle Pastors therfore excommunicate because they bee as the scripture saith true Bishoppes Wherefore if the L. Bishopp of London by vertue of his Pastorall office as hee thinketh which with his brethren the other Pastors of his Diocesse he hath in commō deriveth vnto him immediatlie from the word of God may lawfullie excōmunicate then the pastorall office which Maister Doctor Androes hath ouer the people of his Parish of St. Gyles without Creeplegate and the pastorall function which Maister Doctor Whyte hath ouer the people of St. Dunstones within Temple-barre beeing as absolutelie as immediatlie deduced vnto them out of the same word what profe can be made out of the worde that the Bishoppe being not Lord Pastour of the Pastours of his Diocesse may lawfullie by the worde excommunicate all maner of offendors both Pastors and people within his Diocesse and yet neuertheles that neither Maister Doctor Androes nor Maister Doctor Whyte by the same worde may excommunicate any one of their Parishioners at all Nay further what reason can there be afforded from the law of God that Maister D. Abbot Deane of Winchester that Ma. Browne Maister Barlowe and diuers other prebendaries in the church of Winchester hauing certeyne parochiall and pastorall churches annexed to his and their Deanrie and Prebendes and Maister D. Grey in his parish by their pastorall functions should haue absolute authoritie vnlesse it bee during the time of the L. Bishoppes trienniall visitation to exercise the discipline of Christ within their seuerall and peculier churches and yet notwithstanding that neyther Maister Richman nor Mai. Burden being both of them graue godlie learned Pastors should haue at any time anie pastorall authoritie to exercise any censure at all And as it is in the church of Winchester so is it in the church of Paules in the church of Salisburie in well nigh all if not in all the Cathedrall Collegiall Churches thoroughout the Realme The Deane Prebendaries and Canons hauing certayne parochiall Churches exempted from the Bishopp within their exempt and peculier iurisdictions by mere Pastorall authoritie for episcopal authoritie by the lawes of the Church haue they none may exercise all maner of spirituall censures and that aswell by their substitutes as by them selues Nay which is more in Cheshire Lancashire Rurall Deanes in Cheshire c. vse some part of episcopall power Yorkeshire Richmondshire and other Northeren parts there be manie whole Deanries exempted from the Bishopps iurisdiction wherein the Deanes and their substitutes haue not onlie the probate of Wills and graunting of administrations but also the cognisance of ecclesiasticall crimes with power to vse the ecclesiasticall censures Yea and this authoritie of the executiō of ecclesiasticall censures haue those Deanes either long since by some papall priviledges Episcopall power to excōmunicate graunted by papall priuiledges or prescribed vse obteyned or els by long vse prescribed against the Bishopps Whereby againe it is clerelie convinced that Episcopall excommunication vsed in the Church of England is not of divine institution but onlie by humane tradition For were it of diuine right then could the same Power to excommunicate if it be of diuine right may not be prescribed no more bee prescribed or by papall immunitie be possessed thē could these Deanes prescribe power or bee enfranchised to preach the word or to administer the Sacramentes These things haue we thus at large more fullie intreated of to the end that the Kings Highnes and his Parleament and all sortes of people might well vnderstand howe it is not altogether an vnvsual and vnaccustomed thing in the Church of England that private inferiour ministers as they call them in their owne right and in their owne parochiall parishes without any authoritie from the Bishoppe should exercise even the highest censure of the Church And that in sundry places of the Realm there is no preeminence in the matter of the execution of the censures attributed to a Bb. aboue a Minister Nay whiche is more then is attributed to a Bb. aboue a No more preheminēce given to a Bb then to a Minister or to a lay man in some places for the vse of excōmunication lay man yea then to such a lay man who is authorized onlie by a lay man to his office Which is evident by the ecclesiasticall iurisdiction and censures exercised a long time by lay men in the peculiar iurisdictions of Newton Gronbie Anstic Soke of Rothelie Evington and other parishes hamlettes in the Countie of Leycester The officers of al which places for their spirituall authoritie having not had any other warrant then such only as hath bin signed sometimes vnder the hande and seale of the right Honorable the Earle of Huntingdon deceased sometimes of the Honorable Sir Henrie Grey knight sometimes of Henrie Skipwith Esquire and sometimes of others For the avoyding therefore of sundrie intollerable inconveniences whiche hitherto hath ensued for want of that authoritie which the Law setled doth enable every Minister with It is most expedient that all humane authoritie in the execution of spirituall censures bee vtterlie taken away and that the divine and Evangelicall censures of Christ bee ministred in every Congregation where learned and godly pastors with discrete Elders may bee had as from the minde of the Lord they were executed in the Apostolicall and primitiue church I had almost forgotten to speake of one common and vsuall kinde of iurisdiction spirituall in the vse of the censures of the church by the Archb. which in cases of their prerogatiue they haue prescribed against the Bb. over the presbyters and people of euery Bishoppes Diocesse and Archdeacons iurisdiction within their provinces of one other cōmon and vsuall kinde of pretensed spirituall iurisdiction and vse of the censures which the Archb. and sometimes the Deane and Chapiter sede Archiepiscopali or sede Episcopali vacante exercise and lastly of that spirituall kinde of iurisdiction censures so called of the Church whiche Suffraganes and Archdeacons haue and do vse As touching which supposed spirituall power both of the Archbishopps Archdeacons because the same their power doth only belong vnto thē iure consuetudinario non scripto by vnwritten and not by written lawe I must conclude against the iurisdiction of the Archbishopps prerogatiue and against the Archdeacons iurisdictiō in all cases as out of St. Cyprian King Henry the eight concluded against the Pope viz That their authorities can not be from Christ Because Christ saide
ego sum via veritas vita He neuer said ego sum consuetudo Touching the iurisdiction of the Deane and Chapter the papall lawe being abrogated how the same may lawefullie now bee vsed otherwise then by sufferance and consent of the King and Realme I know not But of all spirituall authoritie exercised at this day in the Church of England the same semeth to draw most neare to the semblance of the gouernment practised by the Apostles and primitiue Church And might bee approued in many points if so bee the Deane and Chapter being as it were a Senate of preaching Elders did no more commit the execution of their ecclesiasticall iurisdiction to the wisedome of one Vicar general or principall official then they doe put over the leassing of their Landes or dividētes of their rentes to the onlie discretion of one of their Baylifes or Stewardes As for Bishoppes Suffraganes in Englande and in Wales how many there may be and what Cities and Townes are to be taken and accepted for their Seas it is at large expressed in a statute made for the nomination of Suffraganes By which statute also wee are given to vnderstand that it remayneth onely in the disposition and libertie of everie Archbishop Bishop within this Realm c. to name and elect two honest and discrete spirituall persons being learned of good conversation and them to present vnto the Kinge by their writing vnder their Seales making humble request to giue to one such of the saide two persons as shal please his Maiestie such title name stile dignitie of Bishop of such Seas specified in the said act as the Kings Highnes shall think most cōvenient for the same so it bee within the same Province whereof the Bb. that doth name him is Besides after such title stile and name given by the Kinge it is saide that the King shall present every such person by his letters patentes vnder his great Seale to the Archbishop of the same Province wherein the Towne whereof hee hath his title name stile and dignitie of Bishop and that the Archbishop shall giue him all such consecrations benedictions and ceremonies as to the degree and office of a Bishopps Suffragane shall be requisite It is further enacted provided that every person nominated elected presented and consecrated according to that acte shall be taken accepted and reputed in all degrees places according to the stile title name dignitie that he shall be presented vnto haue such capacitie power and authoritie honor preeminence reputation in as large ample maner in cōcerning the executiō of such cōmission as by any of the saide Archb. or Bb. within their Diocesse shall be given to the saide Suffragane as to Suffraganes of this Realm hertofore hath bin vsed accustomed And that no Suffr made cōsecrated by vertue of this act shall take or receiue any maner of profits of the places Seas wherof they shall be named nor vse haue or execute any iurisdiction or Episcopall power or authoritie within their said Seas c. but only such profites iurisdiction authoritie as shall be licensed and limited vnto them to take do and execute by any Archbishopp or Bb. within their Diocesse to whom they shall be Suffraganes vnder their seales And that no such Suffragane shall vse any iurisdiction ordinarie or Episcopall power otherwise nor longer time then shall be limited by such commission to him giuen vpon peyne c. From which Act touching the vse exercise of Episcopall power and censures by the Suffragane we may againe safely conclude that the Episcopall power graunted by the Bishops to be vsed by the Suffragane is not of diuine right and institution but only from humane devise and ordinance For the Suffragan could not exercise any power called spirituall or Episcopall vnles by the Bb. he were nominated by the King elected and presented by the Archb. consecrated and by commission vnder the Bb. seale authorized in what maner and for what time he should exercise the same Custome then being not from heauen but from the earth and againe the Bb. commissiō limiting the Suffraganes delegated power being of man and not of God it followeth necessarilie that that Episcopall power which the Bishoppes vse and exercise in England can not be diuine but humane Because Episcopall authoritie which is diuine being conveyed from the Royall and Souerayne authoritie of our Sauiour Christ the giuer of all power vnto euerie officer within his Church can not be transferred to any other person by the same Bb. by the King by the bodie of the state or by custome For the Kings person and bodie of the state not being made capable by the holie scriptures to vse and exercise that Episcopall power which is of diuine institutiō can neuer transferre the same to others whereof they be thē selues vncapable And to defende that custome or any municipall lawe should transferre diuine Episcopal power from a divine Bishopp to any humane officer is more erroneous And from hence if the now L. Bb. of London iudge his Episcopall power to belong vnto him by divine and that by the same right he haue power aswell to ordeyne depose suspend and excommunicate presbyters as to confirme boyes girles yong men maydens there seemeth to bee good reason that the same Bb. should make it apparantly knowne vnto the King Realm by what power or commission descended from heaven hee may delegate vnder his Seale the same his divine authoritie of ordination deposition suspension excommunication and confirmation vnto Doctour Sterne his now Suffragane of Colchester For if from the holy Scriptures hee can produce no warrant for the making of a delegation of any part of that Episcopal power which he holdeth to be cōmitted vnto him frō our Savior Christ then well may we conclude against the ordination deposition suspention excommunication confirmation made by the same his Suffragane that the same his Suffraganes ordination deposition c. is not divine For how can an ordination a deposition c. made by a Suffragane be divine when as the commission graunted by the Bishop is meerlie humane Wherefore seeing the Bishop himself hath plucked certeyne of his principall feathers from his own spirituall winges if so be his owne winges may be spirituall and imped them with an vntwysted thread of humane policie to the humane trayne of his Suffragane and seeing also his Archbishoppes grace of Canterburie in cases of his metropoliticall prerogatiue the Archdeacons London Midlesex Essex Hertforde the Deane of Paules and certeyne prebendaries in Paules the Deane of Westminster the Maister of the Savoy and divers other Persons haue by Papall privileges or by auncient custome prescribed almost all other partes of his Episcopall power there seemeth good reason that the Bishoppe should againe declare whether the Churches within the saide Diocesse after the decease or translation of his Lordshippe shall stande in neede of any Lordlie Successour to sitt
in the same Sea for anie other profitable vse or purpose then onely for wearing of a whyte rochet walking with a pastorall staffe keeping seuen yeares Sabboth from preachinge in his parishe Church of Fulham consecrating of Chappels hallowinge of Fontes Christening as they call it of Belles whyting of Walles painting of Tombes garnishing of Sepulchres preserving of superstitious Monumentes in glasse Windowes repayring and gylding rotten and outworne Crosses confirming Leases of Benefices with cure of soules vpon small rentes improprying Churches or such like For if the great thinges of his Episcopall power may bee transferred eyther by expresse or by secret consent eyther by commission or custome and that as well to an inferiour as to a superiour as well to a Suffragane a Deane an Archdeacon and a Prebendarie as to an Archb. then it seemeth reasonable that the smaler things before spoken of may well bee performed without anie Lordly authoritie When I had thus finished according to our line that whiche I firste vndertooke against the Admonitors pretensed dangerous alterations innovations and inconveniences was also purposed to haue added that which in myne opinion seemeth to prove that whiche the Admonitor by his opinion denyeth viz that the externall goverment of the Church should alwayes and in all places bee one when I saye I had thus purposed by reason of some other present and for the time more necessarie occasion I was drivē to alter my mind and to shewe the same in a place somewhat more convenient And yet in the meane whyle it shall not be amisse but a thing verie necessarie in this place so to cleare the state of the question betweene the Admonitor and mee as the same beeing rightlie before hande vnderstoode there might no preiudicate opinion bee conceaved against the trueth The Admonitor against the not having of one forme of externall policie in all ages and states of the Church of Christ alleadgeth that in Denmarke they haue Bishoppes both in name and in office that in Saxony they haue Archbishoppes and Bishoppes in office but not in name that in Tigure they haue no Senate of Elders nor the discipline by excommunication which they more mislike that in Geneua in Scotland in other places they haue a gouernment not much vnlike that platforme which is desired to be amōg vs that in Saxonie Basill they kneele at the Lordes Supper all Tigure they sitt it is brought vnto thē that in other places they go and receyue it for the more expedition as they passe And that he doubteth not but that the learned men whom God sent to instruct those churches in which the Gospell in those dayes was first receyued haue bin directed by the spirit of God to reteyne this libertie that in externall gouernment and other outward orders they might choose such as they thought in wisedom and godlines to bee most convenient for the state of their countrey and disposition of the people Vnto all which we answere briefelie viz. that Bishoppes both in name and in office beeing of diuine institution ought aswell to bee in the Church of England as of Denmark that it is an errour by their leaue in the Church of Saxony not to haue Archb. and Bb. in name if so be they hold it lawful to haue Archb. and Bishops in office For what should a necessarie officer doe without a conuenient name And touching the Church of Tigure it is not materiall what the same church doth thinke not tolerable or doth more mislike but what shee ought not to mislike or what it ought not to think tollerable And thē what a poore proofe is there here made trowe we for the confirmation of the corruptions in the Church of England by producing for two witnesses two erroures in the Church of Tigure For not to like a Senate of Elders and more to mislike excommunication is more and more to slide out of the right way And sithence we haue the whole christian Kingdome of Scotland the most famous and renowmed Church of Geneua and sundrie Churches by his confession in other places to be lights vnto vs and to agree with vs in a gouerment not much vnlike to that which we desire wee haue not only great cause to reioyce in this our desires but also to be much comforted and encouraged by these examples by all holie meanes to labour the full accomplishment thereof For by this testimony by these instances giuen produced by him selfe the Admonitor hath quite and cleane weakened and disabled his owne generall position opinion and thoughts of the vnnecessaries and inconvenientnes of hauing the Apostolicall and primitiue gouernment in the time of peace vnder a Christian Magistrate For hath not the free Kingdome of Scotland the free Citie of Geneva and other Soueraigne and free Princes Potentates and Powers not being vnder Tyrantes and persecution receaved the same as being the best the fittest the convenientest most necessarie gouerment yea even in the time of peace and vnder their christian Magistracie for the state of their countrey and disposition of their people And as touching rites ceremonies we affirme not that every rite ceremonie or circumstance to be vsed in the externall execution of church goverment is preciselie sett down in the holy Scriptures but touching the substance of goverment thus we say and thus we hold viz. that the Officers and Governours appointed by our Saviour Christ to bee over the Churches in everie Countrey observing the generall rules of decencie comelines and edification haue libertie with the consent of their Christian King or other supreame Magistrate to choose what rites ceremonies they in wisedome and godlines shall thinke most convenient And therefore wee graunt that the officers of Christ in the vse and dispensation of their functions are no more exactlie tyed by any direct commandement in the holy Scriptures to vse at all times and in all places one only maner of rites ceremonies then were the Priests of the law to vse all one maner of kniues to kill their sacrifices or the singers to sing all songes after one maner of tune or vpon one kind of instrument or then are Kinges Princes in all Countreys commanded to vse all kind of circumstances in the outward execution of civill iustice in their common weales As then as it was lawful for the Priests to haue kniues and trumpets of divers fashions and for the Levites to haue their Musicall instrumentes of divers formes Nay as sundrie Iustices of peace in sundrie Shires of the Kingdome are not bound to keepe their quarter sessions all in one day to begin to breake their sessions at one instant to stande to sit to walke when soever they speake to weare all one fashion hates cappes cloakes or gownes and such like so likewise is it with the Bishops Pastoures and Elders of the church In the ministration of Baptisme there is no direct cōmandment that the vessel to hold the water for the
childes Baptisme should be of stone of pewter of brasse or of silver whether the Minister should descend to the lower ende or the childe ascend to the vpper end of the church Whether the child should haue a great handfull or a litle sponefull of water powred vpon his head In the celebration of the Lordes Supper it is directlie commaunded that the people shal stand sit or passe whether it should be celebrated every first or second Sabboth of the moneth whether in the morning at noone or at night In the ordination of Ministers there is no iust proofe to bee made that any certeyne number of Ministers are to lay on their hands that the day of ordination should be alwayes one that the Minister should bee of such an age or that the prayers should bee of this or of that lenght and forme of wordes And therefore touching these and such like thinges of indifferencie we agree with the Admonitor and reverend Bb. that one forme of externall orders rites ceremonies is not of necessitie to be in every Church because there is no such order witnessed by the holy Scriptures to bee of necessitie But touching the ioynt severall functions of Bishops Pastours and Elders that they or any of them should in any age or state of the church of Christ bee wanting or that such offices as by warrant of the Scripture are coupled together should be severed or that any other persons should be appointed to execute any functions in the Church then such persons only as for their functiōs haue warrant from the holy Scriptures wee can not in any sorte therevnto agree And why forsooth because all both offices and officers in the Church must only and alonely be derived from our Saviour Christ as from the only fountaine and bestower of all officers offices in the house of God And therefore albeit we should graunt as the Admonitor hath saide that the outward order vsed in the primitiue Church touching rites ceremonies by Bishops Pastors and Elders is neither necessarie nor so convenient as it may be otherwise in the time of peace vnder a Christian Magistrate yet we may not herevpō imply as his negatiue implieth viz. that Bishops Pastors Elders or any of them are neither necessary nor so convenient officers or governours as other officers of mans invention might be For which our opinion by the helpe of God wee shall assay as before hath bene mencioned in an other place to lay down out of the worde of God some iust proofes according to the Admonitors request that there ought to be in all ages and states of the Church this outwarde order forme of goverment viz. that Bishoppes Pastours and Elders ought evermore to bee spirituall governours and that evermore they and none other ought to vse that essentiall kind of spirituall goverment and none other which was practised by the Bishoppes Pastours and Elders in the Apostolicall and primitiue Church Allwayes leaving the outward rites and ceremonies of their spirituall kind of goverment to be indifferent as erst hath bene said FINIS Speaches vsed in the Parleament by Sir Francis Knolles and after written to my L. Treasurer Sir William Cecill TO the end I may enform your Lord shippe of my dealing in this Parleament-time against the vndue claimed superioritie of the Bishoppes ouer their inferior brethren Thus it was Because I was in the Parleament time in the 25. yere of King HENRY the eight In which time First all the Clergie aswell Bishops as others made an hūblie submission to King HENRIE the 8. acknowledging his Supremacie and detesting the vsurpation of the Bb. of Romes authoritie Vpō which submission of the Clergie the King gaue vnto the said Bb. the same ample rule that before they had vnder the Pope ouer their inferior brethrē saving that the same rule was abridged by statute by this parenthesis following that is to say without offending the prerogatiue Royal of the Crown of England the lawes customes of the Realm In the latter end of the Statute it was added that whosoeuer offendeth in any one parte of that statute their Aydors Counsellers and Abbetters they did all fall into the penaltie of the premunire And after I had recited this statute in the Parleamēt-house I declared that in King HENRIES the eight days after this There was no Bishoppe that did practise superioritie ouer their inferiour brethren And in King EDWARDES dayes the said Bb. obteyned a statute wherby they were authorised to keepe their Courts in the Kings name the which statute was repealed in Queene Maries dayes and was not revived in her Majesties time that now is wherevppon it was doubtfull to mee by what authoritie the Bishoppes doe keepe their Courts nowe in their own names because it is against the prerogatiue Royall of the Crowne of England that any should keepe a Court without sufficient warrant from the Crowne Wherevpon I was answered that the Bishopps do keepe their Courts now by prescriptions it is true that the Bb. may prescribe that King HENRY the 8. gaue them authoritie by the statute of 25. of his raigne to haue authoritie and rule ouer their inferiour brethren as ample as they had in the Popes time But this was no speciall warrant for them to keep their Courts by and that in their owne names And yet they haue none other warrāt to keep their Courts as they do now in their owne names to my knowledge And this was the cause that made them obtaine a statute in King EDWARDS dayes to keepe their Courts by in the Kings name Now it is a strange allegation that the Bishopps should claime authoritie at this present to keepe their Courtes in their owne names as they do by prescription because the statute of 25. doth restraine thē generallie from offending of the prerogatiue Royall of the Crowne of Englande and the lawes and customes of the Realm And no man may iustly keepe a Court without a speciall warrant from the Crowne of England as is aforesaid And the generall libertie given by King H. the 8. to the Bishops to rule and governe as they did in the Popes time is no sufficient warrant to the Bishops to keepe their owne Courtes in their owne names by prescriptiō as I take it And therefore the Bishops had done wisely if they had sought a warrant by statute to keepe their Courts in the Queenes name as the Bb. did in Kinge EDWARDS dayes In which time Archbishop Crammer did cause Peter Martir and Bucer to come over into this Realme to bee placed in the two Vniversities for the better instructiō of the Vniversities in the worde of God And Bb. Crammer did humblie prefer these learned men without any challenge to him selfe of any superiour rule in this behalfe over his inferiour brethren And the time hath bin that no man could carry away any graūt frō the Crown of England by general words but that he must haue speciall wordes to carrie the same by Therfore how the Bb. are warrāted to carry away the keeping of their Courts in their own names by prescriptiō it passeth my vnderstāding Moreover where as your Lordship said vnto me that the Bishopps haue forsaken their claime of superioritie over their inferiour brethrē latelie to bee by Gods ordinance and that now they doe only claime superioritie from her Majesties supreme goverment If this be true then is it requisite necessarie that my L. of Canterburie that now is do recant and retract his saying in his booke of the great volume against Cartwright where he saith in plaine wordes by the name of Doctour Whitgift that the superioritie of Bb. is Gods owne institution Which saying doth impugne her Majesties supreme govermēt directlie therfore it is to be retracted plainly and truly For Christ plainly truly cōfesseth Ioh. 18. 36. That his Kingdom was not of this world And therfore he gaue no worldly rule or proheminence to his Apostles but the heavenly rule which was to preach the Gospel saying Ite predicate in omnem mundū quicūque crediderit baptizatus fuerit salvus erit qui non crediderit condemnabitur Goe preach in all the world who soever shall beleeue be Baptized shal be saved but he that will not beleeue shal be condemned Mark 16. 15. But the Bishops do cry out saying that Cartwright his fellows would haue no goverment c. So belike the Bb. care for no govermēt but for wordly forcible goverment over their brethren the which Christ never gaue to his Disciples nor Apostles but made them subiect to the rule of Princes who ought not to be resisted saving that they might aunswer vnto Princes that they must rather obey God then men Acts. 5. 29. and yet in no wise to resist the Prince but to take vp the crosse and follow Christ FINIS