the magistrate therby hath lesse trouble in his office the common weal more florisheth in peace and prosperity Which difference were it well weighed without cauilling thorowly marked would soone decide this controuersy For hereby the former statute touching the exercise of ecclesiastical discipline by Doctors of the ciuile law meere lay men would clearly appeare to haue been made in a time wherein the truth was not so manifested as now it is For if euery man ought to confesse that it is vnlawful by the word of God for a king and Potentate no minister of the Gospell to excommunicate and so consequently vnlawfull to execute the office of a minister euerye man ought much more to confesse that authoritie giuen by man to a kinges vassall no minister of the Gospell to excommunicate and so consequently to execute the ministers office is an authority giuen vnto man againste the lawe of God and therefore both the lawe speedely to be repealed and the abuse in the meane time to be refourmed And therefore I conclude against that statute thus from the greater to the lesse 1 Whatsoeuer is vnlawfull for the king a lay man to exercise in the Church of Christ the same is vnlawfull for euery of his vassals a laye man to exercise 2 But it is vnlawfull for a king a laye man to exercise Ecclesiasticall discipline in the Church of Christ 3 Therefore it is vnlawfull for a Doctor of the ciuile law a kings vassall and a lay man to exercise the same BVT suppose this statute might in some respect be some excuse to Doctors of the Ciuile law ignoraunt of the word of the Lord yet thereby it followeth not that the bishops may in like sort be excused as wel for that they can not pretende any such ignoraunce they knowing the same to be against the word and not therefore to be practized as also for that they bee not precisely commaunded by the sayde statute to constitute and ordaine Doctors of the Ciuile lawe no ministers of the Gospell to be their Commissaries or officials but they may them selues if they will either reserue and keepe vnto them selues exercise iurisdiction and minister iustice by themselues or els depute such men vnto those offices as by law are capable of iurisdiction and may execute ecclesiasticall discipline according to the word of God I meane onely ministers of the Gospell But suppose againe that by force of this statute bishops were absolutely commaunded to ordaine Doctors of the Ciuile law to be their onely Commissaries and officials and that all sentences of excommunication and other ecclesiastical coertions exercised by the sayde Doctours meere laye men were good and duely and rightly ministred by force of this statute and so the Byshops by that meanes exempted from all iust reprehension in this behalfe yet what can be aunswered concerning the proceedings iudgementes executions and censures pronounced by meere laye men no Doctors of the ciuil law Bedell at Liechfield Liche at Chester Chippindale at Leicester Langeford at Bedford Glasier at Oxenford Greene at Glocester before they were Doctours of the ciuill Lawe mere lay men Talentine at Northhampton a meer lay man executed ecclesiasticall coertion discipline a long time Saye at Winchester Babyngton at Lichfield Hudson Dethick in the County of Yorke bishoppricke of Durham meere laye men no Doctors of the ciuile lawe execute and exercise Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction and all censures and coertions belonging to the same at this day And though it may be aunswered that some of these no Doctors were or be Deacons and so Cleargie men and therefore no laie men I reply though they were or be in deed Deacons and so one kinde of Cleargie men that they can not therefore excommunicate c. De regni iuris li. 6. ea Ea quae fiunt a iudice quae ad eius officium non spectant viribus non subsictunt Whatsoeuer things be done of a Iudge belonging not to his office the same thinges are of no force For let vs put the case that some Archdeacon or Chauncelor and yet no bishop had ordayned some man to be a Deacon pronouncing wordes apt to the giuing of such an order whether such a one be a Deacon I answere no because power to make Clearkes doth not belong to the order of priesthood vnlesse the ordayner be a Bishop Or suppose that a Bishop had graunted one an hundred dayes of pardon for some good worke that he had don whether this graunt by law be good Truely no. Because it belongeth to a Bishop onely to giue forty dayes of pardon and not an hundred In like manner I conclude though some in authoritie exercising ecclesiastical censure be Deacons yet notwithstanding that their sayde censure is in lawe no censure as a thing not belonging to the office of a Deacon but onely to the office of a minister There remayneth yet one other obiection namely that excommunication is not vsed as an Ecclesiasticall but rather as a ciuil punishment Whereunto I answere that such mē speak altogeather without book that by law they shal neuer be able to iustify their assertiō And vndoubtedly whosoeuer shal account excōmunication to be a ciuile punishment the same man is shrewdly to be suspected to be a priuie and subtil enemie vnto the Church for therby he excludeth all kind of punishmente from the Church And I include vnder Excommunication Suspension Interdiction and admonition For if Excommunication bee Ciuill then are these also ciuill and if these bee ciuill then what is Ecclesiasticall But such men by vndermining the Churche to mayntayne their owne corrupt abuses require some sharper medicine of pure ecclesiasticall Discipline to heale their vnciuill behauiour and therfore that excommunication cannot be a ciuill punishment I prooue this from the discription thereof ij q. 2. nihil §. euidenter ij q. 3. nemo Excommunicatio est extra cōmunionem ecclesiae separatio vel censura ecclesiastica excludens a communione fidelium vel est aeternae mortis damnatio Excommunication is the seperating a man from the communion of the Church or a censure ecclesiasticall excluding from the fellowship of the faythfull or it is a condemnation of eternall death And this kinde of excommunication is called the greater excommunication There is also another excommunication called the lesse excommunication and the same onelye seperateth a man from the receiuing of the sacramentes Moreouer excommunication is sayde to bee Paena animae mucro spiritualis A punishment of the soule and a Spirituall sworde By which discriptions it is apparaunt that both the greater and the lesser are belonging to the soule and conscience onely and therefore spirituall and therefore no ciuill punishment And therefore I conclude thus 1 No spirituall punishment is a ciuill punishment 2 But excommunication is a spirituall punishment 3 Therefore it is no ciuill punishment For euery ciuill punishment is eyther Poena pecuniaria or corporalis ff de pub iudic l. a punishment by
AN ABSTRACT OF CERTAIN Acts of parliament of certaine her Maiesties Iniunctions of certaine Canons Constitutions and Synodalles prouinciall established and in force for the peaceable gouernment of the Church within her Maiesties Dominions and Countries for the most part heretofore vnknowen and vnpractized Cod. de Epis Cler. l. Nulli licere ¶ Neyther let them feare to be called and suspected pick-thankes seeing their faythfulnesse and diligent trauell carrieth with it as well praise as honestie and godly zeale hauing published the trueth to the eares of all men and brought it to the open light PROVER 31. 8. Open thy mouth for the dumbe in the cause of all the children of destruction To the Christian Reader THou hast seene beloued by long experience a lamentable contention to haue growen and continued in our English Church about reformation of Ecclesiasticall discipline and popish ceremonies whereby the quiet peaceable estate both of the Church and coÌ„mon wealth haue been shrewdlie troubled and brought in hazarde The causes of which warre and dissention I leaue to the good consideration of thy godly wisedome onely I am to intreat thee to accept this my labour bestowed vpon the study of the lawes appoynted for the gouernaunce of the same Church hoping that by the authoritie of hir excellent maiestie and the counsayle of the honorable fathers gouernours of her highnes empire they may hereafter not only be better executed but also if the case so require be reuisited For were the same Lawes either better knowen vnto the whole church either better executed by those vnto whome our gratious Soueraigne hath committed their Execution no dout but very many notable points of such controuersies as haue beene a long time amongst vs woulde be easily speedily by the same laws decyded I am not beloued in this so waighty a cause absolutely to rest my selfe vpon the skill of mine own simple iudgment onely according to the knowledg giuen vnto me I haue for my part faithfully laboured to cite the lawe for that end purpose wherunto I take the same to haue beene first ordeined And therfore I am heartilye to desire thee to accept of this my labour trauail vndertaken not onely for the defence of her highnesse Lawes but also for my brethren and neighboures sakes and that peace and prosperity mighte bee within the walles and pallaces of Ierusalem Farewell and pray in thy spirit for the preseruation of the life of our gratious Queene Elizabeth An Abstract of certaine Actes of Parliament of her Maiesties Iniunctions Canons and Synodals Prouincial established and in force for the peaceable gouernement of the Church within her Maiesties Dominions heretofore for the most part vnknowen and vnpractized BY an act of Parliament made the 25. H 8. C. 19. intituled An act concerning the submission of the Cleargie c. It was enacted as followeth Prouided also that such Canons constitutions ordinaunces and Synodals prouinciall being alreadie made which be not contrariant nor repugnant to the lawes statutes and customs of this realm nor to the domage or hurt of the kings prerogatiue royal shal now stil be vsed executed as they were before the making of this act c. This act is reuiued 1. Eliza. ca. 1. Out of this act I conclude that al Canons constitutions ordinances and synodals prouincial made before this act requiring and commanding a learned Ministery prohibiting many benefices to be giuen to one man prohibiting ciuil iurisdiction to be in Ecclesiasticall men and prohibiting one man to excoÌ„municate for that such Canons c. cannot be contrary or repugnant to the lawes of this realme nor hurtfull to the kings prerogatiue are in force ought to be executed and therefore by this act all the Canons specified in any part of my treatise are in force so by vertue of this act a learned ministerie commanded Plurallities forbidden c. A learned Ministerie commanded by the Lawe Ex De elect Cap. Nihil est NIHIL EST c. There is nothing that may hurt more the Church of God then that men vnworthie are taken to the gournment of soules We therefore willing to applie a medicine to this disease decree by an inuiolable constitution that when any shal be chosen to the gouernment of soules he to whome the confirmation of his election appertayneth diligently examine both the processe of the election and the person elected to the ende that if all thinges concurre aright he may confirme him in his function For otherwise if any thing shall be vnaduisedly attempted not onely â—e that is vnworthily promoted but also the vnworthie promoter him selfe shall be punished and if any man shall approoue any of insufficient learning of an vnchast life or not of lawful age when his negligence herein shal appeare we decree him to be punished thus not onely that he be â—uite depriued of power to confirm the next successor but least by any meanes he might scape vnpunished that he be also suspended from the commoditie of his owne benefie Out of which constitution these conclusions may briefly thus be gathered 1 Whatsoeuer is hurtfull to the Church of God the same is to be forbidden 2 But it is hurtful to the Church of God to haue vnworthie men takeÌ„ to the gouernment of soules 3 Therefore the same is to be forbidden 1 He that cannot worthily execute his office is â—ot to be admitted to holy orders and Eccleâ—…asticall dignities 2 But a man of insufficient learning of vnhonest coÌ„uersation can not worthily execute his office 3 Therefore such a one is not to be admitted to Ecclesiasticall dignities IF any iudge the meaning of this Chapiter to bee onely of superiour Prelates as Archbishops bishops Abbotes or such like elected by some common society of canons Monkes Friers or collegiat Priests because of these words Election Confirmation properly applyed to such not to inferior Ministers which are properly sayd to be presented and instituted then is such both diligently to marke the reason of the decree prouiding a remedie against the detriment that might redounde to the Church in both cases if for both remedie were not before hand prouided And also to vnderstande that the name of Prelate is by law attributed likewise to euery Parson and Vicar hauing cure of soules D. ex de cleric aegrotant c. sua glos lynd Consti de sacra iterand c. ignorantia vers prelati Quia quilibet qui praeest curae animarum dicitur esse Prelatus Euery one that is preferred to the cure of soules is named by this name Prelate And also that election and confirmation in and to the superiour functions haue but the very same effect to the obtaining of their promotions that presentation and institution haue to the inferiour Ministers for enioying of their benefices then is such I say to consider all these thinges together with the end of the chapiter where speciall charge is giuen for inferiour offices And so
for eternall saluation through faith in Iesu Christ And are you determined with the sayd scriptures to instruct the people committed to your charge and to teach nothing as required of necessity to eternall saluation but that you shall be perswaded may be concluded and prooued by the scripture Answere I am so perswaded and haue so determined by Gods grace Bishop Will you giue your faithfull diligence alwayes to minister the doctrine and sacraments and the discipline of Christ as the Lord hath commanded and as this realme hath receiued the same according to the commaundements of God so that you may teach the people committed to your care and charge with all diligence to keepe and obserue the same Answere I will In these two aunsweres and demaundes last specified are principally contayned two things First the Minister chargeth himselfe by a solemne vow to teache and instruct the people committed to his charge with the doctrine of holy scriptures The Discipline of Christ commaunded by Parliament Secondly the Bishop by vertue of the order and forme appointed by act of Parliament bindeth him as well to minister the Discipline of Christ within his cure as the doctrine sacraments of Christe as the Lorde hath commaunded and as this realme hath receiued it according to the commandements of God And therefore euery Minister by vertue of this statute law may as well admonish denounce and excommunicate offendours within his charge as a Byshop may within his Diocesse the wordes are copulatiues and therfore Non sufficit alterum sed oportet vtrumque fieri It is not sufficient to do one but both And these wordes before rehearsed Will you giue your faithfull diligence alwayes to Minister the Doctrine and Sacramentes and Discipline of Christe as the Lorde hath commaunded and as this Realme hath receyued the same according to the commandements of God haue in them two speciall points to be considered one touching the doctrine and sacraments of Christ the other concerning the discipline of Christe out of which two braunches proceed two other questions First whether euery minister ought not to exercise the Discipline of Christ by force of this demaunde and aunswere as well as the doctrine sacraments Secondly whether these namely the doctrine sacramentes and the discipline be to be ministred simply as the Lord hath commaunded or els whether they be to be ministred onely as this realme hath receiued the same without the commaundement of God For these wordes according to the commandements of God are but Synonima vnto those which went before Viz. as the Lord hath commanded and so signifie both but one thing To the first his owne promise to the Byshoppes interrogatorie bindeeth him as well to minister the Discipline as the doctrine and Sacramentes To the seconde if you aunswere that the doctrine and Sacramentes and Discipline of Christ are simplie to be ministred as the Lorde hath commaunded then it must needes followe if this Realme hath receyued the same according to the commaundement of God that the law of the Realme and the Lawe of God commaunde both one thing and so by both Lawes the doctrine and Sacramentes and Discipline are to bee ministred as the Lorde hath commaunded But if you shall saye that these thinges are to bee ministred onely as this Realme hath receyued the same though not according to the commaundement of God then these wordes of the Article following viz. As this Realme hath receyued the same according to the commaundement of God conuinceth you of a slaunderous tongue agaynst the whole state and Churche of God For hereby you accuse them of great impietie and vngodlinesse and attaynt them of high Treason to the Maiestie of God as though the intent of the whole state were to haue the Doctrine and Sacramente and Discipline of Christe ministred according to the commaundements of God in case the Lawes of the Realme had so receyued the same and not otherwise And so to haue restrayned the commaundementes of God by the Lawes of the Realme and so to haue concluded an impossibilitie limiting and restrayning the greater by the lesse and a Lawe most perfecte by a Lawe vnperfecte and not rather the contrarie to haue restrayned in deede the lesse by the greater the Lawes of the Realme by the commaundementes of God an vnperfecte Law the Lawe of man by a most perfecte and absolute Lawe the Lawe of the most Highest whiche is manifest by a threefolde repetition of the one as the Discipline of CHRISTE Secondly as the Lord commaunded Thirdly according to the commaundement of God where the Laws of the Realm are but once onely mentioned Again in the ordering of Archbishops and Bishops the Archbishopp demaundeth of the Bishop this question Will you maintain set forwarde as much as shall lye in you quietnes peace and loue amongest all men and such as be vnquiet disobebedient and cryminous within your Diocesse correct and punnishe according to such authoritie as yee haue by Gods worde and as to you shall bee committed by the ordinaunce of this Realme Doe these wordes and as to you shal be committed by the ordinaunce of the Realme restrayne and lymitte these wordes which went before to correcte and to punnishe according to suche Authoritie as yee haue by Gods worde Surely they can haue no such interpretation For the meaning of these wordes is that euery Byshoppe shoulde by the ordinauuce of the Realme haue his office committed vnto him and once hauing his office so committed vnto him by the ordinaunce of the Realm then to correcte and punnishe according to suche authoritie as hee hath committed vnto him by Gods worde and as he is appoynted by the ordinaunce of the Realme to execute Neyther hath the Bishoppe any authoritie giuen him by these wordes to correct or punnishe any otherwise then the Lawes of GOD permitte him though the Lawes of the Realme were not agreeable to the Lawe of GOD. And in like case I conclude that a minister bounde as you haue seene before to minister the Discipline of Christe ought so too minister the same as the Lorde hath commaunded though the Lawes of the realm shold not haue receiued the same For no discipline in truth cā be said to be the discipline of Christ vnlesse it be in deed ministred as the Lorde Christ hath commaunded the same should be ministred And therfore as no bishop may or ought to correct or punish any transgressour any otherwise then according to the lawes of God so no minister ought to exercise any discipline then such as the Lord Christ hath commanded If it be alleadged that our discipline vsed in the church of Englande be in very deede the very same discipline which the Lorde Christ hath commaunded which is vtterly vntrue as appeareth First and principally by the word of god Secondly by the discourses writtē betweene the learned on that behalfe Thirdly by the discipline practized by all the reformed churches and lastly by maister Nowell his Catechisme
priestes and the prophetes slewe Vriah with the swoorde yet ceased not Ieremiah to stande in the Court of the Lordes house to speake vnto all the cities of Iudah all the wordes that were commaunded him to speake and kept not a word backe 2 Kin. 23. 3. When Hilkiah the priest had found the booke of the lawe and caused Iosiah to reade the same it is written that the KING stoode by the piller and made a couenant before the Lorde that he the KING and the priestes and the prophetes and all the people both small and greate should walke after the Lorde and keepe his commaundementes and his testimonies and his statutes with all their hearte and with all their soule And that the KING commaunded Hilkiah the high priest and the priestes of the seconde order to bring out of the Temple of the Lorde all the vessels that were made for Baall and for the grooue and for all the host of heauen and that the KING burnt them without Ierusalem in the fieldes of Kidron and that the KING carryed the powder of them into Bethel and that HE put downe the Chemerym and that HE brake downe the houses of the Sodomites and that HE brake the images in peeces c. When the spirite of the Lorde came vpon Azariah to tell Asa and all Iudah and Beniamin that the Lorde was with him whilest they were with him encouraged them in their affliction to turne vnto the Lorde God of Israell for that their confidence and trust in him shoulde not be frustrate but haue a rewarde Asa hearing these wordes of the prophet was encouraged and tooke away all the abhominations out of the lande of Iudah and Beniamin And King Asa deposed Maachah his mother from hir regency And Asa brake downe hir idoll and stamped it and burnt it at the brooke Kidron 2. Chroâ—… and king Asa did all these thinges at the councell of the Prophet Neither can the holy doctrine of the Gospell be sayde to be repugnaunt herevnto God is euer more one and the selfe same God in all ages he is euermore the authour of peace and order not of discord or disorder If therefore the Lord haue not yet gratiously opened hir maiesties eyes to vnderstand all singular misteries of his Testament or if he will some blemish to remaine in the gouernment of a faithfull Queene vnder the Gospell as it pleased him to haue blottes in the raigne of good kings in the time of the law or if he will that the aduersaries of Iudah and Beniamyn hyre counsellers to trouble their building and hinder their deuise all the dayes of Cyrus or if he will the Temple to be built in the dayes of Esra the chiefe priest but the walles to be reedified by a Eliashib and his brethren or if he will haue his Church tary his holy leasure and appoynted time or if he haue any other glorious purpose to work in our dayes by hir highnes what is that to him that is a minister of the Gospell Onely it behooueth him to be a faithfull Steward in his function For an woe hangeth ouer his head if he preach not because necessitie is layde vppon him And let him be assured that whatsoeuer is either bounde or loosed by him in earth the same is bounde and loosed by the Lorde in heauen The repentaunt and faithfull shall be forgyuen The obstinate and impenitent shall bee hardened And thus hauing deliuered my mynde touching these thinges which otherwise by synister construction might haue beene daungerous to my selfe and offensiue to others Touching the former cauill I answere as followeth First I confesse that euery one meete and apt to teach that euery one qualified as is requisit that euery one mooued inwardly by the holye Ghoste and outwardly called and appoynted by the bishop hauing authoritie by the order of this church of England in this behalfe is in deed by law a minister First because he is indeed truth a messenger sent appoynted to this office by the Lord him selfe Secondly he is a minister by the law of this land For the state of this man learned qualified and inwardly called and the state of the vnlearned vnqualified and not inwardly mooued differ as much as light darknes For where the life the learning the conuersation the paines of the former doe appeare in deede to be sincere sufficient honest and diligent euen such as the law it selfe requyreth should be in him and so the ende of the law satisfied in that behalfe in this case and for this man there is a presumption Iuris de iure of law and by law that in his outward calling and triall c. all thinges requyred by lawe were accordingly perfourmed by the bishop and so he a lawfull minister But touching the other man it is quite contrarie and therefore this presumption by law must cease Glos extrauag de prebend cum secundum Apostolum verdiceat For where his life his learning his conuersation do appeare manifestly to be vile corrupt and vnhonest and not such as the law requyreth and so the law frustrated in this case there is a presumption Iuris de iure of lawe and by lawe against him that he came to his office per surreptionem by stealth and vnorderly Letters obtayned for enioying benefices vntill it appeare they were obtayned either veritate tacita or falsitate expressa truth concealed or falsehoode expressed are good and to be obeyed but if afterwardes either of these appeare they shall bee accounted surreptitious and voyde A Bull or dispensation from the Pope authentically sealed is presumed to haue beene gotten bona fide in good faith but if in the tenor thereof appeare false latine it is then presumed to haue been obtayned per surreptionem A sentence giuen by a iudge is presumed to be a iuste iudgement and euery one for the authoritie and reuerence of the Iudge ought so to deeme of the same But in case the matter be appealed and there be found a nullitie in his processe the former presumption ceaseth and the sentence as an iniurious sentence is to be reuersed In like maner if a Bi. should make an hundreth ministers in one day for the authoritie and reuerence of the bishop and the good opinion I ought to conceiue of his vpright and sincere dealing of his holy religion and feruent zeale to the lordes house were I absent and sawe not his proceedinges to be contrary to law as I ought so I trust I should both esteeme his doinges therein to be lawfull and orderly and also reuerence those whom he had so made as messengers sent from the Lord. But if afterwarde when any of them shall come to execute his office of ministerie when he came to teach the people he shoulde then manifest him selfe to be but an Hipocrite but to haue fayned a certaine kinde of holinesse and zeale when he shall him selfe discrie his owne vnablenes and displaye his wantes were it
precisely dissalowed cannot by the secōd branch of the same be generally approoued For how can one the self same law forbid and comand things so contrary and repugnant in themselues Or how can the Archbishop safely ground his iurisdiction vppon a lawe so contrary and repugnaunt vnto it selfe If the Archbyshop shall think that these two braunches may be reconciled that the meaning of the former maye and ought simply to be vnderstood as the words them selues import and that the second braunch may and ought to be vnderstoode to bound and limite such an authoritie to him selfe as whereby he might graunt such licenses as were had and obtayned at that time at the sea of Rome for matters not contrary or repugnant to the law of God yet neither by this interpretation is the Archbishop truely intituled vnto any authoritie therby to dispence for symony nonresidence many benefices marriages in Lent c. in as much as such maner of licenses obtayned at that time at the sea of Rome were obtayned for matters repugnaunt vnto the law of God and contrary to the truth of the doctrine of the Gospell and so by this statute flatly forbidden Which thinges our auncestors not thoroughly foreseeing neither duely examining for what maner of causes or matters licenses were at that time obtayned at the sea of Rome but onely in a generallitie inhibiting thinges repugnaunt vnto the law of God and neuer particularly describing what those things were but leauing the same wholy to the iudgement and discretion of one man the Archbishop alone haue fallen into two palpable absurdities the one that one man alone hath from time to time authoritie by his discretion to determine what causes are repugnaunt to the holy scriptures and lawes of God what causes matters are conuenient for the honour and safety of the King of England and what are necessary to be had for the wealth and profite of the realme three thinges of such waight and importaunce as the whole body of the realme at that time was scarceable to conceiue much lesse shall euer any one Archbish be able to practize The other absurditie is this viz. that by this statute soueraignity is giuen to the Archbishop and his successors to dispence with the king and his successors kinges and Queenes of Englande The wordes of the statute are plaine and euident But what reason is there for kinges and queenes of England to become wardes and pupils vnto an Archbishop of England Or howe agreeth it with the worde of God that a Christian king should in any sort be in subiection vnto his owne vassall Or what christian subiect dareth attempt to offer vnto his Christian soueraigne a tolleration For in case the matter of the sayde tolleration be pretended to concerne the conscience then if the matter be free and lawfull by the law of God a Christian king may as well and as freely vse the liberty of his conscience with out licence from his subiect as his subiect maye vse his freedome without dispensation from the king If it be contrary to the lawe of God then may neither a christian king neither a Christian subiecte be dispenced with For what man can dispence with the Lawe of God And in case the matter of dispensation concerne any thing appertayning vnto this life how then should the king receiue a dispensation from the Archbishop without impeaching his kingly dignitie and prerogatiue For either he must bee dispenced with for breach of the positiue Lawe of this lande and haue the payne of Lawe remitted him by the Archbishop which were to set the Archbishops keyes aboue the Kinges armes Or els he muste purchase a dispensation that he may breake his Lawe which were against his honour and safety For saith the Emperour Digna vox est maiestate regnantis legibus alligatum se principem profiteri C. De le cōstit princ l. digna It is a worde worthy the maiestie of a ruler to acknowledge himselfe as chiefe tyed vnto the lawes Moreouer this case between the king and the Archbishop is farre different from the case betweene the king and his Iustices at lawe determining matters according to the common lawes and customes of the Realme betweene the king and his subiectes For they remayne still the kinges vnderlinges and in deed giue but the kinges iudgements they iudge not the kinges person neither commeth any thing touching his person before them But dispensations from the Archbishop to the king concerne the kinges owne person The king in his royall person or by his proctor muste appeare in the Archbishops consistory he must alleage before the Archbishop sufficient matter whervpon the Archbishop but a subiect may be mooued to dispence with the King his soueraigne and finally the Kinges wisedome muste be subiected to the Archbishops discretion And therefore to confirme the Minor proposition of my third syllogisme I conclude 1 Whatsoeuer is dishonourable and dangerous for hir highnesse person the same can not be conuenient for hir honour and safetie 2 But it is dishonourable and daungerous to haue the Archbishop to dispence with hir highnesse 3 Therefore the same is not conuenient c. WHich reason also maye as well be applied to disprooue the vnlawfulnes of the Archbishops dispensations granted vnto any of hir highnes subiectes as vnto hir highnesse owne person in as much as hir kingly prerogatiue and supreame gouernment in matters lawful by the holy scriptures is therby impeached The Arch. iurisdictiō only aduanced the surety of hir royal person peace of the cōmō weal il prouided for Againe sithence euery one of sound iudgement vnderstandeth the honour and safety of hir highnesse person onely and wholly to consist in the protection and safegarde of our most mighty and most gratious God and that nothing can bee so honourable and safe for hir highnesse as humbly and reuerently to attend and to submit hir selfe to the scepter of his word the execution of this statute by the Archbishop can not be but most inconuenient and perillous for hir highnes person in as much as partly through a corrupt construction partly by a synister iudgement not rightly discerning what thinges are repugnant to the word of God the sayde Archbishop dispenseth in causes and matters contrary and repugnaunt to the holy scriptures which causeth the name of God to be euill spoken of and is a dishonour vnto God and therefore no honour nor safety vnto hir highnes person And therfore hir highnes is humbly to be intreated to take the entier dominion and whole soueraignty due vnto hir by the word of God into hir owne handes and not anye longer to suffer such a blemishe to remayne in hir gouenement Had hir highnesse moste noble Father vnderstoode his kingly person to haue vndergone the Censorship of his subiect no doubt he wold as couragiously haue fought against an Archb. as he did against an Abbot Pouerty of the person no cause for a dispensatiō As
the lawes are not onely vnprofitable but also are to be accounted for thinges vndon And thus much concerning the causes circumstaÌ„ces of dispensations for many benefices It followeth theÌ„ in the description of a dispensation as you haue seen that the same ought to be granted cum causae cognitione with knowledge of the cause the reason is this Glos Extrauagan de prebend dig c. execrabilis ver vltima Duo sunt in dispensatione necessaria authoritas dispensantis factum per quod dispensatur Nam in quolibet actu considerari debent duo factum modus Two things are necessary in a dispensation authoritie of the dispenser and the fact whereby he shall dispence For in euery Act two thinges are to be considered the fact and the maner of the fact And therefore a magistrate hauing authority to dispence ought not vpon the bare assertion and simple allegation of any person disirous to be priuiledged and to haue the Magistrate to mitigate the rigour and extremitie of common right graunt any such mitigation vnlesse the partie first alleadge and by some lawfull proofe make manifest vnto him that both touching the abilitie of his person and the necessitie of his cause there ought in equitie an exemption and immunitie be graunted vnto him For Priuilegia sayth the Lawe ff de minori l. de etate d. ex de priuil c. sane 7. q. 1. potuisti bast l. 1. de col l. ver are preiudicialia magnum pariunt preiudicium ideo sunt cum plena causae cognitione tractaâ—…de priuilegium non est dandum nisi certa ratione inspecta non subito sed cum magna deliberatione Priuiledges are preiudicall breede great preiudice and are for this cause to be handled with a plenarie decision of the cause And a priuiledge is not to be giuen vnles the certain reason therof be foreseen and not sodenly but with great deliberation aduise In which deliberation aduisemeÌ„t taken by the iudg first the allegation or petitioÌ„ of the party agent or suppliant secondly the prone manifestation of the same his perioÌ„ is to be coÌ„sidred For no dispensatioÌ„ ought to be graunted at the proper motion and pleasure of the iudge alone but euery Dispensation ought to be granted at the instance and petition of the party alone § Hoc autem iudiciuÌ„ ff De dam. infect ff De regni sur l. inuito extra de Symo. Licet heli Cod. de fidei com liâ—…ent l. si Quiae laxari iâ—… non debet nec solui nisi parte postulante inuitâ— non debet beneficium conferri Et sententia debet esse conformis petitioni Et index semper debet indicare secundum allegata probata Because the Lawe ought not to be released or remitted but at the petition of the partye and a sentence ought to bee conformable to the demaunde and a iudge ought euermore to giue sentence according to thinges alleaged and thinges prooued And therefore sithence no other cause by Lawe may be alleaged in the Court of faculties for the graunting of any dispensation for many benefices then the very apparant vtility and vrgent necessity of the Church I conclude that the iudge his duety office is in any wise not to admit any other maÌ„ner of allegation but to pronounce the same altogether friuolous and to be of no valew in Lawe The Doctorship the Chapplainship the worship of any ecclesiasticall person are not sufficient causes in this behalfe alone vnlesse also together with the same meete and concurre the profite and necessity of the Church And if the said allegation as vaine and friuolous be to be reiected then no Dispensation thervpon ought to be graunted for otherwise the Iudge should of necessity eyther allow other causes then the Lawe doth allowe or else pronounce iudgemente otherwise then according to the demaund both which were too too greate absurdities And therfore out of the former rules and principles of Lawe I argue thus 1 Whatsoeuer is hurtfull and preiudiciall the same ought aduisedly and vppon consultation to bee graunted 2 But Dispensations are hurtfull and preiudiciall 3 Therefore dispensations ought aduisedly and vppon consultation to be graunted Extra de priuilig c. sane And if euery dispensation ought to be graunted by sentence vpon some consultation had that then euerye sentence vpon some consultation had ought to be giuen according to thinges alleadged and thinges demaunded Extra de simo c. licet heli IN which allegation and demaund to the ende the sentence may be conformable to the demaunde and so effectuall in law must be foreseene two things First that there be expressed no false or erronious cause Secondly that the same hide or conceale no truth Glos in extrauag execrabilis de prebend ver ex dispensatione For Ea dicitur legitima dispensatio in qua nihil tacetur vel nihil exprimitur quo expresso vel lacito princeps verisimiliter duci potest ad dispensationem denegandam That dispensation is reputed lawfull wherein nothing is concealed or nothing is expressed that beeing concealed or expressed the prince may be likelihood be induced to deny the said dispensation If then euery sentence must be conformable to the allegation and euerye iudgement agreeable to the demaund and that neither out of the sentence for a dispensation any knowen truth or manifest equitie ought to bee concealed neither in the same any salse or erronious cause ought to be expressed it followeth of necessitie that euerye allegation made for a dispensation ought to be of the same nature and of the same condition and that euery allegation not of the same nature and condition is an vnlawfull allegation and an vnequall petition Moreouer euery one that hath authoritie to dispence ought to keepe this rule Glos in extrauag coÌ„i col 3. ver Vt statuat vel disponsit contra ius aut contrascriptum si aequitas quae mouet ipsum mouisset legislatorem si casus nunc emergens esset sibi expositus That they ordayne or dispence against law or against writ if such equitie as mooueth him might haue mooued the Law-maker himselfe to haue graunted a dispensation had the case now growing bene proposed at the time of the law making to the law maker It followeth then againe that equitie beeing the cause of the sentence for a dispensation the same equitie must also bee the cause of the allegation for a Dispensation For if the iudge must giue a dispensation where equity requireth the party must then demaund a Dispensation where equity requireth For equity is always the foundation and grouÌ„dwork of a dispensatioÌ„ And what equity eueÌ„ such equity as might iustly haue mooued the Lawemaker to haue graunted a dispensation Nowe then because the Lawmaker authorising the Archbysh of Cant. to giue Dispensations hath beene the high Court of Parliament It followeth that the Archbysh may dispence onely in such cases as wherein the high
Extra ne cleric vel monac c. sententiam A Byshop may not bee a iustice of peace in cause of bloud SENTENTIAM c. Let no Clearke indite or pronounce a sentence of bloud neither let him put in execution any sentence of Bloude or bee present where it is exercised Neither let any clearke indite or write Letters to bee destined for the auengement of bloud Therefore in the courts of princes let not this care be committed to Clearkes but to lay men And agayne Extra de exces prelat c. extra EPISCOPVS cuius authoritate c. Abishop by whose authority manslaughter is committed is deposed from the ministery of the Alter and from his pontificall office and from the administration of his Bishopricke A Bishop eyther directly or indirectly giuing cause that manslaughter be committed the same being committed ought to be depriued from his Byshoply and Priestly office to be remooued from the administration of his Bishopricke And that this Chapter may not seeme sayth the Glosse to be vnderstood of manslaughter or murder vniustly committed or perpetrated these words are added in the Text Quia propter furtum quidam fur suspensus erat Because for theft a certayn theefe was hanged In the time of Henrie the second I finde that the sayde King gaue certayne Priuiledges and immunities vnto the cleargy the Tenor of which graunt ensueth Math. Pari. H. 2. fol. 185. ARCHIEPISCOPI EPISCOPI c. The Archbishops Byshops and all persons of the kingdome which hold of the King in cheefe let them haue their possessions of the King as a barony and thereof let them aunswere to the Kings Iusticers and Ministers and let them follow and doe all the Kings customes and as other Baronnies so shall they be present in iudgementes of the Kings Court with the Baronnes vntill the matter come to the losse of member or to death By which priuiledge graunted vnto the cleargy as I suppose our Bishops at this day haue their seates in the Starre Chamber and are Lordes of the Parliament house For before the graunt made by this King it doth not appeare they had any such priuiledges the words of the king not ratifiyng or confirming any former graunt made by his auncestors and predecessours Kings of England as in all giftes of confirmation vsually is done but gratifiyng his Clergy and other of his subiectes by giuing them newe liberties and franchises whereof before his time they were not possessed for in the graunt there is no repetition or mention of an Inspeximus wee haue seene the charters of our father grandfather or great grandfather but here is a meere and absolute graunte deriued principallye from the kings owne person H. 2. Whereby I gather that these offices in Cleargy men haue not bene of any long continuance in England and that by the ancient laws and customs of England they do not properly belong vnto them onely the King by his prerogatiue hauing power to make Barons at his royal pleasure and to appoint Iudges in his Courtes at his gratious will hath by the same his Prerogatiue graunted vnto the Cleargy that which before time by the common laws of his Empire did not appertayn vnto them and that therefore as the common weale was gouerned iustice ministred and lawes executed in the Kings Courts by the Barons before the time of this graunt by H. 2. without the ayde and assistaunce of Cleargye men euen so might the common weale at this day be as well gouerned by the like gouernment without any help frō any of them as in deede and truth the same in matters of pollicye and greate state these 24. yeares hath bene wonderfully gouerned without them For which of the Cleargy men since the Lorde sealed vp the eyes of Queene Mary hath once set his foote within the Councell Chamber dore to consult with the Nobility of matters of state Which of them hath carried any sway or borne any stroake in the Starre Chamber otherwise then as the punie Baron there hath doone And if Archbish and Bysh may be spared in the Parliament house yea may not come into that assembly at all whensoeuer any statute is to be made touching felony or treason or the losse of any member or sheading of any bloud◠I see not but they may as well be spared in matters of possessions and inheritaunces and in other matters of state and pollicy whatsoeuer and so much more rather in these then in the former by how much more the life of man is more precious then all other earthly possessions or treasures And by howe much more the taking away of the life of an innocent is more odible and heynons before the Lorde in case it be not done according to his worde In which matters the diuines are fittest to bee consulted with and whose counsels are not to be omitted least life bee taken away where it is forbidden or death take no place where it is commaunded But be it so that our B. may pretend their iurisdiction in ciuill causes to bee more auncient then from the time of K. H. the second yea be it that they may deriue the same from Edgar or Canutus before the conquest yet because Canutus ordayned that the B. of the Diocesse should be present at the Courtes of euery shire onely to teach the people Gods Lawe as Edgar before him had appointed the Shirife to be present at the assemblies and Synodes holden by the Cleargy twise a yeare onely to teach the same clergy mans Lawe namely the lawe of the Realme They are not to boast of Antiquity for their iurisdiction in causes ciuill They haue beene appointed long sithence to meete in deede in Ciuill Courts but onely to exercise the spirituall sworde But were it so that by the Lawes of Edgar and Canutus they might seeme to challendge great regalities dignities and immunities yet they know that by the Lawes of the first King and last King of the most noble most highest and most holiest king the king of al Kings our Lord Iesus Christ whose vassalls in worde they professe themselues to bee they haue no such enfranchisemēts granted vnto them yea rather that they be precisely willed being ministers of the gospel not to be called Lords or to be deuiders of inheritaunces But we will goe forward For not onely the decrees and ordinances before mentioned against seculer iurisdiction and ciuill offices in Ecclesiasticall men haue bene made and published by the B. of Rome and his Legates or Messengers for the regiment of his Cleargy a kinde of people as he saith onely to be gouerned by such positiue lawes as proceede from his brest Ciuil gouernment forbidden by the ciuill law to ecclesiasticall men But the Emperour also by the Lawes of his Empire hath directlye and absolutely commaunded the same ALIVM AVTEM FIERI c. But we suffer not a Byshop or an elder in his owne name or in the name of his Church or ministery to be made a receiuer or
rites ensignes and ceremonies c. yet now foras much as we are certaynely infourmed that they bee altogeather Antichristian and therefore expresly against the worde of God we maye and ought to vrge the generall intendement of the statute generally to take them awaye Secondly were not the foresayde popishe rites ensignes and ceremonyes Antichristian and expresly against the lawes of GOD and therefore by this braunche of the statute might bee ministred vsed and exercised yet notwithstanding it is manifest that the sayde rites ensignes and ceremonies haue not beene appoynted by the prerogatiue of anye of the Kinges of this Realme but haue beene transferred from Italye vnto Englande by a forren and vsurped power and therefore by the seconde braunch of the statute as thinges authorized contrarye to the Lawes of the Realme are not anye more to be vsed or exercised In the time of King Henry the seconde we haue seene before that this priuiledge was graunted to Archbishops and Bishops that they shoulde holde their possessions of the King as a Baronie and shoulde be present in the Kinges courtes as other of his Barons If in these dayes they did sitte them selues in their owne Consistories and exercise gouernement by the lyke authoritie their Courtes happely woulde not be so contemptible as they bee nor their iudgement seates so abused as they are The people woulde be better quyeted in those places and offer lesse iniurie to the magistrate then now they doe And therefore I conclude that though hir highnesse and the lawes indirectly and as it were alatere tollerate these men to rule and gouerne according to those forreigne lawes whereof they haue the execution yet the more faythfull and loyall euery subiect is the more he should and doth contende to haue the whole and entyre gouernement of the Church and Common weale directly immediately and absolutely to spring from hir highnesse as from the heade and fountaine vnder Christe of all gouernement to be executed amongest hir subiectes In dooing wherof they shall dutifully and Christianly more and more mayntaine hir prerogatiue The Emperour forbidding Ecclesiasticall men to vsurpe Ciuill offices lost no whit of his imperiall prerogatiue ouer the subiectes yea rather hereby he openly declared the magnificence of his Empyre and the absolute authoritie he had ouer them and that as well by forbidding things not to be doone as by commaunding thinges to bee done Enemies of reformation enemies vnto hir maiesties prerogatiue For though he spoyled them of vnlawfull preeminences yet he enriched them with lawful liberties I know not the inward intent and meaning of such as mislike to haue ciuill gouernment translated frō Archbish Bish and Archdeacons vnto the ciuill magistrate But if I may speake that which may shrewdly be suspected they may seeme to be greater enemies to hir highnes prerogatiue then others be For though outwardly in wordes they seeme to graunt vnto hir all libertye in the disposition of ciuill offices whervnto the others do likewise agree and condiscende yet they seeme in deede to be loath she shoulde drawe the sword of hir prerogatiue cut a sunder the coards of their cōsistories They graunt hir authoritie to make them selues iustices of peace and ecclesiasticall commissioners and so wage law for hir prerogatiue An easie matter for them to stande in plausible to flesh and bloud their outwarde man delighteth with outwarde pompe and credit But suppose the case stood between the Archb. Bish and Archd. and hir maiesty for hir prerogatiue in abolishing their iurisdictiō trāslating the same to others that the matter were to be decided by the gretest part of their own voyces that their voyces were to be giuen in scrutiny not any waies to be knowen who had giuē his voice with or against hir prerogatiue in this case I feare me rather then their Lordeshippes shoulde take the foyle they woulde lay hir prerogatiue in the dust selfe loue woulde haue a strooke and fleshe and bloud woulde be loath to loose any liberty The history of Henry the fifth and the Oration of Henry Chychuby Archbishop of Caunterbury made in the Parliament house to alienate the Kings minde and to disswade his Nobles from the enterprise whereof hee and they had consulted touching the ouerthrow of irreligious houses and to draw their endeuours to make warre and to leauie an armie against the French king might be a forcible argument to anye to perswade him selfe the same thing in this case though he had no other reason to induce him therevnto But the vnciuill intreaty of hir highnesse owne schollers elected by hir gratious commaundemement from Westminster to hir owne Colledges in Cambridge and Oxenforde euen by such as would seeme in words to set vp mightie propes vnder hir prerogatiue argueth manifestlye the same thing For otherwise hir maiesties schollers in all respectes as well qualified as their owne and alwayes elected halfe a yeare before their owne might once in the space of twenty foure yeares though not for their owne sakes yet for their honorable Lady and mistresse sake haue receiued some more fauourable intertainment and preferment in those houses then hitherto they haue done The maisters of those houses woulde not haue placed them next vnto the screene and set them next vnto the Porters lodge as by elections vnto fellowships in the one schoolerships in the other they a long time haue doone Whereas on the contrary side it is apparantly knowen that sometimes the Dean of Christ church in Oxenford a great friend to reformation and a man for his excellent knowledge and wisedome in gouernment singularly commended euen by his enemies in these small matters gaue an apparant and rare example of his humble dutie and loyaltie vnto hir highnes For the reuerent estimation he had caryed of vnto hir highnes ordinance and institution he placed a scholler sent thither by hir maiesties appointment firste and senior vnto all those that were elected into the house at that time he him selfe brought the same hir scholler to his chamber and placed him in a Chamber and studie commonly appoynted for the ancients of the house all his owne schollers were inferior vnto hirs and placed beneath hirs Since the departure of which man if the Audite or butterie bookes of that house were sought you shall finde hir schollers names written alwayes in the latter ende of the booke the last of forty and placed after his scholler whom hir highnesse but the day before had preferred to be a Deane or prebendary in that house The Deanes schollers they goe and sit and are placed foremost the prebendaries in the middest and hirs hindermost and if they were to go a procession as in the time of popery hirs must go foremost as vnworthiest to go next to the crosse And because hir maiestie sometimes by hir letters heretofore requested the Deane and chapiter to receiue into hir Colledge such as she thought meet to be placed Now forsoth to preuent hir bountifulnes
of lay men as in trueth it is already executed by lay men yet the Courtes of Arches and Audience and the Court of Delegates might remayne and continue still and as they ought indeede so they might in worde as well and better to bee called the Queenes Courtes of Arches and Audience as the Archbysh of Canterburies Courtes of Arches and Audience As conuenient for the Doctors to attend vpon the Queene as vpon the Archbysh And as good a sight it were as dutiful a part for my masters Doctoures of the Ciuill Lawe in their Scarlet robes to attend vppon her Maiestyes roiall person in case she passed thorough Paules as to attend vppon their Lordes grace his person And as touching euery other Consistory nowe called the Bpshoppes or Archdeacons Consistory for auoyding of confusion and many iudgement seates if they were vnited and reduced in euery Shiere or euery Diocesse to one consistorye it mighte lykewise haue the name of the Queenes Consistorye and the Courtes bee called the Queenes ciuill Courtes as wherein according to the natures and qualities of the causes before specified Ciuill Iustice might bee ministred and the Popish ecclesiasticall Lawe abandoned and as a froth or filth bee spewed oute of the Common Weale Her hignesse can not more gratify the Pope then by executing his lawe For assuredlye by no meanes can her Maiestye so much gratifye her capitall enemye as by authorising and practising his Lawes nor by no meanes can shee more honour the Lord then vtterlye to abandon all semblaunce of any gouernment proceeding from an enemye and Traytour to his Maiestye Neyther were it a Dodkin matter so little is his Lawe worth in her state and gouernment to haue all Bookes of her enemyes Lawes layde on a heape in Smithfielde and sacrificed in Fire vnto the Lorde her owne common and statute Lawes the Ciuill Lawe for the exellencye thereof receyued among all Nations and certayne prouinciall Constitutions made heretofore at her Auncestours commaundement haue for the moste part alreadye and where neede is speedilye maye haue sufficient matter in them for the gonernment of the Church and Common weale without any helpe from the Laws of the enemy of the church and Common weale Instit de iur natu genti ciui § sed quod The Lawe of a King is as it were the mouth of a King for that he alwayes speaketh by his Lawe And if wee suffer the Pope to speake amongest vs as a King doe wee not honour him as a King If wee imbrace his power doe wee banish his personne If you say that they bee not executed as his Lawes but as ours I aske you agayne why shoulde they at all be executed as oures For in trueth they doe lesse good vnto vs then an Herb-Iohn doth as is sayde in the Potage for that Herbe doth neyther good nor harme But these Lawes doe annoye vs vvonderfullye and they doe vs no manner of good at all They are altogether needelesse they are altogether Bootelesse I woulde to GOD they were altogether footelesse too For touching the gouernment of the Church wee haue first the perfect and altogether righteous Lavve of God to rule the same by Secondlye wee haue her Maiesties Iniunctions the common and Statute Laws of the Realme and the prouinciall constitutions conteyning in effect whatsoeuer ought in anye case by any subiect to bee practised within this Realme Touching the administration of Iustice in anye ciuill cause before mentioned and wherof practise is made in the ecclesiasticall Court there is nothing good in the whole body of the Canon Lawe concerning the same but the same hath beene culled out of the Ciuill Lawe it is but an Epitomy of the Ciuill Law The rules of the Cannon Lawe are for the most part rules taken out of the Ciuill Lawe onely there is this difference that by the Cannon Lawe a man in some case shall not in his whole life time get an end of his suyte as these parties that had a cause depending in the Popes Court twentye foure yeeres and yet in all that space Lis non erat contestata an issue could not bee ioyned wheras by Ciuill Law a cause in the first instaunce ought to bee finished within three yeeres at the vtmoste or else the Agent becommeth non suite And if vppon cause the matter bee appealed after definitiue sencence the same cause of appeale ought ordinarily to bee ended within one yeare or vppon some iust cause extraordinarilye happening vvithin two years Otherwise the appeale is frustrate so that in both instaunces fiue yeares onely must bee spent in suit of law And nowe what reason is there that the Canon Lawe shold be still canonized amongst vs when it was ordeined that none should proceed in any vniuersity doctor of the Canon lawe I thinke the meaning of the ordinance cheefly was that leauing no hope of preferment to the professours thereof the thing being of it selfe so vile they shoulde loose no labour in the study thereof But I will conclude that in as much as by the Canons Constitutions ordinaunces and synodalles prouinciall made before the 25. yeare of Henrye the eyght Byshpos and all other Cleargy men are forbidden to be Vicountes Presydentes Iustices Stewardes Bayliefes gouernoures of Villadges Iudges Aduocates Assessors Tutors Gardians Ouerseers runnagates to seculer Courts farmers of temporall possessions receyuers of reuenewes present in anye place where mencion of anye processe or iudgement is to bee awarded agaynste anye man to the sheading of bloude And in asmuch as they are commaunded to apply themselues wholly to Prayer and supplication and not to neglect their office and to intangle them selues with worldlye businesse And for as much also as the Emperour hath vppon substantiall reasons and principles inhibited the Cleargy vnder his Dominions the like offices to the end there mighte bee no confusion of gouernment nor mingling of offices nor Iustice vnministred nor one to defraude another and for as much also that such Canons Constitutions ordinaunces and synodalles prouinciall before specified bee not contrariant nor repugnaunt to the Lawes Statutes and Customes of this Realme nor to the domage or hurt of the Queenes Prerogatiue royall but rather for the establishment of the same the same Canons beeing both founded vppon the Lawe of God whereby her prerogatiue standeth and is vpholden and confirmed by the Lawes of reason and nature and also ratified by the consent of Emperoures and nations that therefore these Canons constitutions ordinaunces and synodals prouinciall ought to be vsed and executed as they were before the making of the Act 25. Henry the eight and that therefore it is vnlawfull for Archbishops bishoppes or anie Cleargie men to beare any ciuill office in the common wealth If any except that before 25. of Henry the 8. bishops and Cleargie men did vse and execute those offices and that therefore these Canons were not then in vse and executed and therefore not in vse now or to
had relation to the time to come And yet notwithstanding this kind of speach would haue been but a harshe kinde of speach namely to saye Take thou authoritie to preache when thou shalte haue authoritie to preach couplinge the present tense with the future tense the time present with the time to come applying that to them selues but men which is onely proper and peculiar to the holy Ghost vsing the future tense and the time to come for the certaintie of the euent thereof instead of the present tense and the time present But these wordes take thou authoritie to preache the worde to the congregation in the place where thou shalt be appointed is a very proper kinde of speach and the wordes them selues carrie with them a naturall sence As if the statute should haue precisely and absolutely sayd thus In what place soeuer thou shalt hereafter be appoynted to execute the office of a minister thou hast now authority giuen thee to preach For in case this were not the naturall meaning of the statute they might well forbid the minister to administer the Sacramentes without speciall licence in wryting or not to pray or not to fast or not to say seruice or not to bury the dead such like But there is more to serue their turnes and to helpe their cause in the law CanoÌ„ in the iniunctions the law Canon being thus Ex. de heret c. excom § Quia vero QVIA VERO NON NVLLI c. But because some vnder the colour of Godlines denying as the Apostle saith the power thereof challenge vnto them selues authoritie to preach whereas the Apostle sayth How shall they preach vnlesse they be sent all they which are forbidden or not sent shall besides authoritie giuen vnto them either from the Apostolike sea or the Catholike Bishop af the place publikely or priuately presume to vsurpe the office of preaching let them be excommunicated and vnlesse they speedelye repent let them be punished with some other competent paine The iniunction beeing this Item that they the persons aboue rehearsed shall preach in their owne persons once in euery quarâ—er of the yeare at the least one sermon beeing licensed specially therevnto Wherevnto I aunswere that this decree and this iniunction requiring speciall lisences to preach And the Bishop by vertue of the foresayde statute giuing authoritie to preach can not iarre much and that one little wrest wil set them in tune their oddes is so small If I saye vnto one by worde of mouth Syr take here the key of the gate of my pasture where my Grey ambling Gelding runneth opeÌ„ the gate bring him out take him to your owne vse I giue him you franckly hath he not as good a title and interest to my horse as if I had made him a bill of sale vnder my hande and seale And hath not the minister likewise as well a speciall license from a Bishop to preach that is willed openly in the presence of God men and Angels as he that hath a special licence giuen him alone in a corner the one is pronounced solemnly in the middest of the congregation the other is done secreatly by a goose quill Moreouer neither doth the foresayde Canon neither yet the Iniunction require a special licence in wryting to the ende that the minister shoulde haue power thereby onely to preache For so shoulde you take away the forme and order appoynted by act of Parliament whereby authoritie is giuen to a minister to preach and commit the making of a minister to the Bishop without a congregation But the ende why a speciall licence ought to be had is not so much for the partie him selfe to preach within his owne cure as for them that shall admit him to preach out of his owne cure And that appeareth manifestly by the eight Article of the iniunctions The wordes are these Also that they shall admit no man within any their cures but such as shall appeare vnto them to be sufficiently licensed therevnto c. And in the ende of this Iniunction it is expresly permitted to euery minister to preach within his owne cure though he be not specially licensed therevnto The wordes are these And that no other be suffred to preach out of his own cure or parrish then such as shal be licensed as is before expressed therfore a minister to preach within his own cure yea thogh he haue no licence is commaunded In the time of Henry the 4. at what time Wyckliffe preached the Gospel the very same lawes were established against him and his brethren to staye the course of the Gospell and yet were neuer any forbidden to preach in their owne parrishes as appeareth by that that followeth Let no man within this Realme or other the kings Dominions presume or take vpon him to preach priuily or apertly without speciall licence firste obtayned of the ordinarie of the same place Curates in their owne parrish churches and persons heretofore priuiledged others admitted by the Canon law only excepted And that no maner of person seculer or reguler beeing authorized to preach by the lawes now prescribed or lycensed by special priuiledge shall take vpon him the office of preaching the worde of God or by any meanes preach vnto the clargy or layety either in the church or without in Latine or english except he first present him selfe be examined of the Ordinary of the place where he preacheth And so being found a fit person as wel in maners as in knowleg he shal be sent by the said ordinary to some one church or more as shal be thoght expedi ent by the said ordinary according to the qualitie of the person Nor any persoÌ„ aforesaid shal presume to preach except first he giue faithfull signification in due forme of his sending and authoritie that is that he that is authorized do come in forme appointed him in that behalfe and those that affirme they come by speciall priuiledge do shew their priuiledge vnto the parson or Vicar of the place where they preach And those that pretend theÌ„selues to be sent by the Ordinary of the place shal likewise shew the ordinaries letters made vnto him for that purpose vnder his great Seal Let vs alwaies vnderstande the Curate hauing perpetuitie to be sent of right to the people of his own cure Furthermore no clergy maÌ„ or PerochiaÌ„s of any parish or place within our prouince of Canterb. shal admit any maÌ„ to preach with in the churches churchyardes or other places whatsoeuer except ther be first manifest knowledg had of his authority priuiledge or sending thither according to the order aforesayde Touching the first protestation to be made promised subscribed by theÌ„ that shal hereafter be admitted to any office roome or cure in any church or other place ecclesiastical contained in these words in the booke of aduertisements In primis I shal not preach or publikly interpret but onely read that which is appointed by publike authority without special
licēce of the Bi. vnder his Seal though hir Maiest most excellent name be vsed by the publishers of the saide aduertisemēts for confirmation of thē that they affirme hir M. to haue cōmanded them therevnto by hir highnes Letters yet because the book it selfe cōmeth forth without hir M. priuiledge is not printed by hir M. printer nor any in his name therfore it carrieth no such credit and authority with it as whervnto hir M. subiects ar necessarily bound to subscribe hauing other laws other Iniunctiōs vnder hir M. name authorized by hir M. priuiledge cōtrary to the same For hir M. by hir Iniunctions cōmādeth euery minister to preach within his own cure without licence as before you haue hard But let vs go forwarde It hath bin shewed before that euery one to be made a Deacon or a minister ought to be called tried examined known to haue such qualites as were requisite that mentiō also hath bin made of the face of a church of the latine tong of many other circūstances necessary to that actiō al which things set down rather generally thē particularly described require a larger discourse Panormitan the Doctors vpon the ciuile and Canonicall law haue these conclusions Ex. n. ca. dictus de consuetu nu 2◠Statuta debent interpretari secundum 〈◊〉 commune siuè debent interpretationem recipere à iure communi statuti verba dubia debent interpretari vt minus ledat ius commune quà m sit possibile Statutes ought to be interpreted according to common law or statutes ought to receiue their interpretation from common law and doubtfull wordes of a statute ought to be so construed that they be as little preiudiciall to the common law as is possible Out of which conclusions I collect this rule Namely that where a statute shall establish an office practized and had in vse before the making of the statute and shal require a calling a triall an examination and qualities in an officer meete to execute that office and shall not specifie and declare any particular kinde of calling of tryall of examination and such qualities c. That then such maner of calling of tryall of examination such qualities are requyred by that statute to be in such an officer as by common right were requisite for such an officer before the making of that statute And because by the viewe of the former order it selfe it is very apparant that the same forme and order was appoynted by men very desirous to promote as much as in them lay the honour and glory of God and to abolish all superstitions and trumperies brought into his Church Therefore because I ought by dutie to conceiue their meaning to the best and most agreeable to their profession I say that they ment herein onely such calling such triall such examination and such qualities as are requisite to be in a Deacon and in a minister by the lawe of God Which is euident both by the order of prayer vsed at the time of their orderinges and also by the scripture read for that purpose The prayer followeth Almighty God which by thy diuine prouidence hast appoynted diuers orders of ministers in the Church and diddest inspire thine holye Apostles to choose vnto this order of Deacons the first martyr S. Steuen with other mercifully beholde these thy seruauntes nowe called to the like office and administration replenish them so with the trueth of thy doctrine and innocencie of life that both by worde and good example they may faythfully serue thee in this office to the glorie of thy Name and profite of the Congregation thorowe the merits of our Sauiour Iesus Christ who liueth and raigneth with thee and the holy Ghost now and euer Amen After this prayer followeth the Epistle out of Timothie Likewise must the Ministers be honest not double tonged not giuen to much wine neyther greedie of filthie lucre but holding the Misterie of the fayth with a true conscience And let them first be prooued and let them Minister so that no man bee able to reprooue them Euen so must their wiues be honest not euil spekers but sober and faithfull in all things Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife and such as rule their children well and their owne houshouldes For they that minister well get them selues a good degree and a great libertie in the faith which is in Iesu Christ c. or else this out of the 6. of the Acts. Then the twelue called the multitude of the Disciples together and sayde It is not meete that wee shoulde leaue the worde of GOD and serue tables wherefore brethren looke yee out among you seuen men of honest report and full of the holy Ghoste and wisedome to whome wee may commit this businesse but wee will giue our selues to continuall prayer and to the administration of the worde And that saying pleased the whole multitude and they chose Steuen a man full of fayth and full of the holy Ghost and Philip and Procorus and Nicanor and Timon and Parmenas Nicolas a conuert of Antioch These they set before the Apostles and when they had prayed they laide their hands on them c. The Communion ended shall be saide this Collect Fol. 1. pag. 8. ALmightie God giuer of all good thinges which of thy great goodnesse hast vouched safe to accept and take these thy seruauntes vnto the office of DEACONS make them wee beseeche thee O Lorde to bee modest humble and constaunt in their Mynistration to haue a ready will to obserue all Spirituall Discipline that they hauing alwayes the Testimonye of a good Conscience and continuing euer stable and strong in thy Sonne Christe may so well vse themselues in this inferiour office that they may bee founde worthye to bee called to the Higher ministeryes in the church thorow the same thy sonne our Sauiour Christ to whome be glorie and honour world without end Amen The Epistle appointed at the time of ordering of ministers shal be read out of the twentie chapiter of the Acts. Fol. 8. pag. 1. From Mileto Paule sent messengers to Ephesus and called the elders of the congregation which when they were come to him he sayd vnto them Yee know that from the first daie that I came into Asia after what manner I haue bene with you at all seasons seruing the Lord withall humblenes of minde and with many teares and temptations which happened vnto mee by the layings awaite of the Iewes because I would keepe back nothing that was profitable vnto you but to shewe you and teache you openly thorowe euerye house witnessing both to the Iewes and Greekes the repentaunce that is towardes GOD and the fayth which is towarde our LORD Iesus And nowe beholde I goe bounde in the spirite vnto Ierusalem not knowing the thinges that shall come to mee there but that the holy Ghoste witnesseth in euerie Citie saying that bondes and trouble abide mee but none of these
then when as the whole maner of the gouernement of the Synagogue should haue beene altered For as at that time their lawes were vnaduisedly translated from them vnto vs So by their lawes we might aduisedly haue transformed them from amongst vs. They were Schismatiques and heretiques by the lawes of our religion and therefore not to haue beene admitted by the lawes of their owne profession Yea if they remaine Idolaters still or keepe backe from the people of God the word of God they are to be remooued still their ietting vp and downe in their square ruffling white philacteries or mumbling their mattens euensong are not so forcible to keep them in as their insufficiencie negligence contempt idolatrous harts are to thrust them out And yet no part of good wholsome and christian gouernment and pollicie chaunged For though Iosiah mooued by compassion beningly suffered the priestes of Baal repenting of their idolatry to receiue tithes and offerings with their brethrē the Leuites Yet he streightly charged them not to enter into the Lordes sanctuary to doe any maner of seruice there Neither did this his religious fact any whit hinder the outward peace of his kingdome Wherefore if a B. an Abbot an Archd. an elder a phisition a Iudge an aduocate a Iailor a tutor a schoolmaster an Orator and a philosopher by iustice and equity of law for vnabilitie insufficiencie negligence or other defects ought to be deposed and remooued off from their roomes places offices and honours how should a pretensed minister onely intruding him self to an office of most high calling excellency and vtterly destitute of all giftes and graces fit for the same be suffered to keepe and retaine the proper right and title of an other as his owne lawfull possession inheritance Had the worshippers of the false Gods care that their idolatrous priestes should haue knowledge of their idoll seruice and shall we the worshippers of the true God be blameles before his iudgement seat in case we mayntain such to serue him in the ministery of his holy gospel as whose seruice the veriest Paynymes idolators woulde refuse to haue in their idoll temples Cod. de epis co cleri l. Si quis curialis l. 12. And though these be sufficient proofes to euery one not adicted to his own wil preferring the same to al reason that prohibitus clericari debet reuocari ad pristinū statū per manus iniectionē that serui vitā monasticā deserente◠ad prioris domini seruitutē restituuntur Cod. de epis co cleri l. serui one prohibited to be a clark ought to be reduced to his former estate by authoritie of the magistrate and seruaunts forsaking their monasticall life to be restored to the bondage of their former maister Cod. de decoren l infamia li. 10. de dignita l. Iudices lib. 12. And that Infamia non solum impedit praefici sed etiam remoueri facit a dignitatibus habitis And infamie doth not onely hinder a man to be preferred but also causeth him to be remooued from dignities already recouered Though I say these former proofes be sufficient to confirme these assertions yet to make the matter somewhat more plaine I haue thought good to reexamine the order and forme appoynted by the former statute for the making of Deacons and ministers that if vpon examination thereof also there do appeare such a defect by statute lawe as whereby our dumbe and idoll ministers be no ministers in deede and trueth but onely in shewe and appearaunce that then therevppon order may be taken by hir maiestie for the displacing of them and for the placing of other lawfull and godly ministers in their roomes For as the statute hath limited a certaine order and forme of making Deacons and ministers so hath it appoynted that all that are made according to that order and forme should be in deed lawful Deacons and ministers The wordes of the statute are these And that al persons that haue beene or shall be made ordered or consecrated Archbish bishop priestes and ministers of God his holy worde and sacramentes or Deacons after the forme and order prescribed in the sayde order and forme how Archbish bishops priestes Deacons and minsters shoulde be consecrated made ordered be in very deede and also by authoritie hereof declared and enacted to be and shall be Archbishops priestes ministers and Deacons and rightly made ordered and consecrated any statute law Canon or other thing to the contrary notwithstanding Which statute hath two braunches the one appoynting the forme and maner of making Deacons and ministers the other authorizing Deacons and minsters made ordered after the forme and maner prescribed in the sayde booke to be in very deede rightly and lawfully Deacons and ministers and so to be taken and reputed It followeth then that if the first braunch of the statute be broken and that the forme and order be not obserued that the second braunch can take no place for that in deede the validitie of the latter dependeth altogeather vpon the obseruation of the first For it is plaine and euident by lawe that if you woulde haue a seconde or latter action to be good and effectuall because it is done say you according to a forme and order precedent you must first prooue that the Precedent was accordingly done or els the consequent can take no place And therefore if the forme and order prescribed by the book be not obserued in making vnlearned ministers I say then that vnlearned ministers by lawe are no ministers at all And why ff ad leg fal l. si is qui. § quaedam Neque eum vllum balnieum aut vllum theatrum aut stadium fecisse intelligitur qui ei propriam formam quae ex consumatione contingit non dederit Neither can he be thought to haue made any bath or any Theater or any race who shall not giue it that forme which perfecteth the same Againe Vbi ad substantiam alicuius actus exigitur certa forma fundans se super alio actu debet quis probare formam precessisse Panor in ca. 9. extra de Iudicijs Where to the substaunce of any act a certaine forme is requyred founding it selfe vppon an other act ther a man ought to prooue the forme to haue passed before As for example In an euangelicall denunciation if thou seeke to haue thy brother cast foorth of the congregation First it is requyred that thy brother haue offended thee Secondly that thou priuately admonish him and brotherly wish him to amende Thirdly if he continue obstinate thou muste tell it him before two or three witnesses and if he heare not them then thou must tell it to the Church before whom if thou desire I say that thy brother by them should be cast foorth of the Churche thou muste first prooue an offence committed against thee by him Secondly and thirdly that you did both priuately by himselfe
Panor in c. fin §. is autem nu 5. de offic deleg SI PRINCEPS c. If the Prince commit a cause to any and commaunde him personally to execute the same if in this case consist publike commodity this his commissary can not substitute an other no not euen with consent of parties because where the Prince either couertly or expresly doth make choyce of the industrie of any one particular person there the partie so chosen can not surrogate an other For the Prince herein doth personally qualifie the man and giueth vnto him the forme of his commission De offic c. deleg l. 6. c. si cui c. fin extra de offi delegat An example of this may be thus De offic delegat li. 6. c. si cui ex de offic deleg c. vlt. Suppose that the treasurership in Paules were voyd and that hir highnes had commanded the B. of London to prouide a fit man for the same roome whether now the B. may commit this his charge to be perfourmed by an other then by him selfe or no And it is answered negatiuely because in the choyce of a fit person consisteth great danger therfore the B. beeing but an executor of hir Maiest pleasure he may not substitute any other But suppose that hir highnes had cōmanded the same B. of Londō to haue giuē the same prebend to Lucius Titius whether thē might the B. in this case subdelegat Archdeacon Sempronius And the answer is affirmatiue that he might for now her Maiest by hir selfe hath nominated the partie to be placed hath not chosen the B. industry for that purpose and therfore he may assign this prouision vnto an other But it is otherwise where the industry of a Person is chosen concerning one to be elected for then he may not set ouer that his office to any other Now then out of these rules lawes I conclude that sithence it hath pleased the high Court of Parliament particularly and expresly by name to make choyce of the Archd. hath personally qualified him as their meetest man for this charge chosing the industry of his own person in presenting fit men to be made ministers or of his deputies in presenting fit men to be made Deacons and for so much also as in this action consisteth the publike benefit of the whole church and on the which hangeth the greatest perill daunger of the whole church For these causes I conclude that an Archd. onely must ought of necessitie present one to the B. to be made a minister that the B. can not dispence with him in this case and that neither the B. neither the Archd neither the party to be made a minister neither the clearkes and people present by their consents can alter or transpose any thing herin ff de pact l. ius publicum Publica vtilitas est pars agens Publike vtilitie is the party agent in this busines and Parta priuatorum inri publico non derogant The couenants agreements of priuate men doth not derogate from cōmon right And if the contrary haue been practized what may be concluded therof shal follow immediatly And againe by these proofes you may euidently see that the calling the triall the examinatiō the time the person appoynted to present and the age of one to be presented haue not been things meer contingent but rather essential not causas sine quibus non but causes formall to the making of Deacons ministers and such causes as beeing omitted haue been sufficient causes both to depose from their functions those that haue ben contrary wise ordained to punish the ordainers for their negligence in that behalfe And therefore that our tong tied ministers not made according to the order and forme of the statute be in deed and truth no ministers at all the act it selfe whereby they be made wherby they challenge their dignities being in deed no act in law hauing no law to approue the same therefore to be punished by the law of mā as wel for entring into a calling against the lawe of man as also for prophaning the holy and sacred misteries of God For what if respect be had to one or two or foure or moe of the solemnities and circumstaunces before rehearsed and those too perhaps of the least weight moment as vnto the age the time the B. particuler interrogatories the Archd. presentation and yet the rest of the greatest waight and importance as their learning their honesty their aptnes to teach c. be negligētly or wilfully omitted Shall the proceedinges by such as please them selues in their owne inuentions be both iudges parties thus in shew apparance only supposed to be done by them that are wise and vpright iustices whom publike profit ought to mooue to the redresse of disorders be reckoned to be don in deed and verity Yea if all the former solemnities yea euen those also of the least moment such as in truth might haue ben reputed accidentall rather then substantiall had it pleased the law makers to haue appointed them so haue beene are oftentimes omitted in the making of ministers one neuer called neuer tried neuer examined neuer known to the B. before that day to be of any vertuous conuersation not qualified as is requisit not learned in the latine tong not sufficiently instructed in holy scriptures as he that came to the B. of Winchester to serue in his Diocesse borne at Norwich and made a minister at Peterborow knew not how many Sacraments there were and requested a dayes respite to aunswere the bishop what the office of a Deacon was not made openly in the face of the congregation but priuately in the bishops Chamber or Chappell not hauing any Sermon not apt to execute his ministerie duely not presented by the Archdeacon the Bishoppe making ministers at Exceter and his Archdeacon at Oxenforde or the bishop making ministers at Leichfielde and his Archdeacon at Durham not mooued by the holye Ghost not admitted on a Sunday or holy daye not of 24. yeares of age not perswaded of the sufficiencie of the doctrine of the scriptures to saluation not an example in him selfe and his familie to the flocke of Christ not a minister of the doctrine and discipline of the Lorde Christ not a peacemaker but quarrelling at law for tithe Oynions apples and cheryes not a dispensour of the worde of God Fol. 11. p. 2. not a pastour and stewarde to the Lorde to teach to premonishe to feede and prouide for the Lordes flocke if such a one I saye yea if too too many such haue beene admitted into the holy ministery and all these solemnities vnsolemnly abused may it not be rightly concluded that such by our statute lawe be no lawful ministers at all Was the word of any Bishop onely the worde of the high bishop Iesus Christ excepted in any time or in any place a lawe against the Lawe
of a nation Was the law of a whole Empyre euer tyed to the will of one man in a Diocesse If the thing it selfe were not manifest to the view of the whole Realme and that the vnlearned mimisters in euery part of the realme were not glasses to see these deformities by that the dayly and lamentable complaints in the eares of hir honourable councell were not euident testimonies thereof Yet were their owne registers and recordes thorowly perused they would teach vs sufficiently that these things yea and worse to if worse may be are neither fayned nor forged And therefore I conclude thus 1 Whersoeuer a certaine forme order to proceed is appoynted to any hauing no authority before his coÌ„mission that there if the forme be not kept the processe by law is meerely voyde 2 But our bishops before the making of the statute of Edwarde the 6. and the confirmation thereof 8. Elizabeth had no authoritie to make Deacons or ministers 3 Therefore their processe not made according to the order and forme of the statute is voyde and therfore our dumbe and idoll ministers no ministers at all Herennius Modestinus answered that a Senator was not therefore a Senator because he had his name onely in the table or register where the names of Senators were written vnles he also were made a Senator according to law And the glosse vpon that law verifieth the same to be an argument Contra eos qui non sunt râ—cte in ecclesiis constituti Against those that are not rightly placed in Churches ff quand dies leg vel fidei sed l. quod pupillae iunat gloss If a Legacie be giuen vnto a Pupil whensoeuer she shall marrie if she shall marrie before she be Viripotens the Legacie is not due vntill she be Viri potens quia non potest videri nupta quae viruÌ„ pati non potest nec videri factum quod non legitimè fit Finally in the praeface of the booke of ordering Ministers are these words And therefore to the intent these orders should be continued and reuerently vsed and receyued in this Church of England it is requisite that no man not being at this present bishop priest nor Deacon shall execute any of them except he be called tryed examined and admitted according to the forme hereafter following And in the 13. yeere of Elizabeth cap. 12 it is enacted that all admissions to benefices institutions and inductions to be made of any person contrary to the form or prouision of this act and al tollerations dispensations qualifications and license whatsoeuer to be made to the contrary hereof shall bee meerely voyde in lawe as if they neuer were Another principall reason why these idoll ministers shoulde not haue so much as the onely name or tytle of ministers in worde much lesse the place and benefite of ministers in dee de may bee for that in deede and trueth they haue intruded themselues into the ministery onely by fraude and deceite and haue not entered thereinto Bona fide iusto titulo in good fayth and by a iust tytle Cod. de autorita prestand l. cum qui. 6. q. 7. si quis deinceps ex de simo non satis Hee that knoweth a pupill to be vnder age and yet will contracte with him without consent of his tutor or hee that will receyue a Church from the hand of a laye man or he that will buye and sell things dedicate to religious vses can not in these actions meane any good faith or vse any good conscience because qui contra iura mercatur bonaÌ„ fidem presumitur non habere He that against the law maketh marchandize is presumed not to haue good faith Cod de autorit prestaÌ„ l. cum qui. 6 q 7. si quis deinceps extra de simo non satis Extra de regu in c. qui contra Now in the maner and forme of making ministers and their admission you haue heard of a solemn couenant and contract by opeÌ„ protestations on both sides made between the B. and the partie A contract made betweene the B. and the minister not obserued the B. demanding spondes put as facies dost thou promise dost thou thinke wilt thou do The partie aunswering spondeo I doe promise puto I doe thinke faciam I will do it This contract or couenant by law Ciuill is called stipulatio verborum a sure bond made by wordes and may be called a contract by worde By the law of Englande it is called an assumption And to the ende this contract be good in effect as in all other contractes so in this especially it is requisite that the same be made bona fide interueniente good faith comming betweene as well on the part of the demaundant as on the part of the answerer In ff pro solut l. 3. Cod. de vsur l. venditioni In Cod. de actio oblig l. bonam For saith the Emperor Bonam fidem considerari in contractibus aequum est Equity requireth that good faith be considered in contracts And that either to this end Vt cesset dolus ad eoruÌ„ essentiam or to this end vt cesset dolus ad eorum effectum that guile may cease to the substance of the contract or that guile may cease to the effect of the contract ff de dol l. eleganter ff de verb. oblig l. si quis â—um For though according to the nature and condition of this contract by word the party fraudulently deceiued be notwithstanding by rigour subtiltie of law bound to the contract yet in as much as the lawe prouideth him a remedy against this mischief giueth him a peremptorie exception vtterly to exclude the agent from any benefit of his action the contract I say in effect beeing reuersible is in effect no contract and the aduerse party to be cleared from the performance thereof Quia contractus non sortitur effectum propter exceptionem doli The couenant taketh no effect by reason of the exceptioÌ„ of guile The law it self followeth Si quis c. If any when he had couenanted to be bound after one manner yet notwithstanding by circuÌ„uention is bound after another manner he shall indeed stand bound vnto thee by the subtilty of law but he may vse an exception of deceit for in as much as he is bound by deceit an exception is giueÌ„ him As for example I haue promised vnto you my ground excepting the vse of the fruit therof afterwards by collusioÌ„ you perswade me to promise you the same ground together with the vse of the fruit therof this promise in effect is void because you vsed deceit in getting my promise Ye suppose that you for your part had not beguiled me that ther had bene no deceit on your part but that I had beene beguiled only because the thing it self was wrongful iniurious in this case also your action shall cease your writ shal abate IdeÌ„ est c
If no deceit on the part of the demaÌ„dant haue bene vsed but the thing it self hath in it deceit it is all the self same one case with the former For wheÌ„ so euer any man shal make a demand by vertue of that coÌ„tract in asmuch as he doth demaÌ„d it he doth it by deceit As for exaÌ„ple suppose I haue boght in good faith without collusion of you a peece of Plate for lesse then the one half of the iust value therof as suppose for 8. Pound which was worth 20. po afterwards I couenaÌ„t with you simply you promise to deliuer me the same plate in this case if I sue you for the deliuery of the plate you may vse an exception of guile against me because I deal deceitfully in demaÌ„ding the performance of a coÌ„tract which in it self coÌ„teineth iniquity For this coÌ„tract it self is against the equity of lawe prouiding that a man should not be so vnprouident in selling his goods as to sel theÌ„ vnder the one half of the iust value And therfore in this coÌ„tract being against law appeareth a manifest iniquity because the plate being worth 20. Pounds was solde by you for 8. Pound a lesse sum then 10. pound halfe of the iust price and therefore in it selfe by law without equitie and therefore neither to be demaunded by me neither to be performed by you And to make this more playne and so to apply it to my purpose bona fides good Fayth in this contract ought to be in this sort You for your part and I for my part and we both ought in trueth to think and bee of opinion that you haue interest right in the plate and so power to alienate and to sell it vnto me And therefore concerning the contract made betweene the Byshop and the party because the Byshop oftentimes knoweth the partie that is to be made a minister by him to be a man altogether vnlearned vnfit and vnapt to execute his ministerie duely and therefore cannot thinke him to be a man quallified as were requisite And because the partie that is to be made a minister knoweth himselfe vtterly voide of those graces and gyftes which ought to be in him and therefore cannot beleeue him selfe to bee truely called or mooued to that office by the holy ghost And because they both know that there hath bene no such calling no such tryall no such examination no such presentation c. As by the forme and order of the booke shoulde be I say therefore that good fayth wanting on both partes this contract made coulourably betweene them is meerely voyde and the one not bounde by lawe to the other to the perfourmance of the same therfore much lesse the common wealth or the Church of Christ to tollerate their conspiracie or to bear with their collusioÌ„ ff de Liber causa l. si pariter Extrauag de regni iure c. non est Extrauag co Non debet alterius collusione aut inertia alterius ius corruÌ„pi No maÌ„s right oght to be impayred by collusion or slouth of another Fraus dolus nemini patrocinari debet deceit guyle ought not to patronage any And therefore sithence Non est obligatorium contra bonos more 's iuramentum An othe made against good manners is not obligatorie and that Nemo potest ad impossibile obligari No man can be bound to a thing impossible and that Impossibilium nulla est obligatio of things impossible there is no band ff de reg in l. impossibilum Extra de reg nu in malis And that In malis promissis fidem non expedit obsernari It is not expedient that Fayth be kept in wicked promises I conclude that the impossibility or iniquitie of condicions to be perfourmed by him that is made a Minister make the contract betweene the Byshop and him meerely voide and of none effect in Lawe The impossibilitie of the contract made betweene the Bish â—nd the minister cause that the contract is voyde And that the Byshoppe according to the true intent and meaning of the Lawes whereof he hath the execution ought to cite and Ex officio to proceede and obiecte agaynst him in this sort You A. B. Parson of C. about twentie foure yeeres passed at what time I had appoynted a solemne day for making of Deacons and Ministers had called by my Mandat men meete to serue the Lorde in his holy seruices to teach his people and to be examples to his flocke in honest life and godly conuersation came before me making a great bragge and fayre shewe of zeale and conscience and of your knowledge in the holy Scriptures and that you woulde instruct them faythfully and exhort them diligently in the doctrine of Saluation by Christ in holinesse of life that you would exercise his Discipline according to his commaundement and that you woulde bee a peacemaker And all these thinges you faythfully promised and tooke vpon you to performe ioyning your selfe openly to the Lordes people in prayer with a solemne vowe Nowe so it is as I vnderstand by your demeanor euer since that in trueth you had no other ende but to steale a liuing from the Church though it were with the murther of many soules You dishonored the Lorde you made an open lye in his holy Congregation you circumuented mee by guyle and by crafte deluded me you haue euer since falsifyed your worde You haue not preached one Sermon these many yeeres you haue not instructed one of your parrishe in the doctrine of Saluation by Christ alone you haue not gouerned your familie as became one of your coate you haue not exercised the Discipline of Christ against any adulterer any swearer any drunkarde anye breaker of the Lordes Sabbothes you haue beene and are a quarreller among your neyghbours you cite them to my consistorie for toyes and tryfles and so abuse my iudgement seate you are an example of euill and not of goodnes vnto your flocke you ment no good faith at the firste you wittingly tooke vpon you a charge which in your owne conscience you knewe was impossible for you to discharge you prophaned the Lords most sacred name in praying hypocritically before him you haue not since repented you of these iniquities but haue continued obstinate in the same and therefore in as much as you for your part without any good conscience haue gotten you a place in the ministerie I for my part mooned by a good conscience and for the same my conscience sake to discharge my duetie to the Lorde haue summoned you publikely lawfully and rightly to disposse you of that place and depose you from that function whereof though publikely yet vnlawfully and vnrightly you are possessed neyther ought you or any other to thinke me rashe light or vnconstant in so doing For I tell you playne that herein I will both saye and doe that thing which the noble and wise Emperour sometimes both sayd and did in a
limitting parishes haue inlarged some with wyder borders and straightened some with narrower passages then was meete and conuenient So were it very good and commendable for men of wisedome in our dayes to yeelde to haue a better equallitie then that some should haue al and some neuer a whit some two or three thousand pounds by the yeare and some scarcely xx Nobles so that the pastor that now hath too little might by some meanes haue sufficient and that he that hath now too much might haue a conuenient competencie If Sempronius the taylor should make Titius his garment too short wasted and Seius his garment too long wasted it followeth not therefore that Caius the pilferer to make himselfe a garment shoulde by stealth conuey both garments away By the vnfolding of these fallacies you may iudge that if pluralitie men to serue their turne indeed could haue framed their argument skilfully they woulde then haue fashioned the same after this sort 1 Whatsoeuer is established and distinguished by man alone the same may be taken away and vnited by man alone 2 But Churches that is to saye Congregations of the Lords people pastours of these assemblies and the liuings for the pastours of these assemblyes were established and distinguished by man alone 3 Therefore Churches pastours and liuinges for pastours may be taken away and vnited by man alone Now because the Minor proposition of this Sillogisme is vtterly false therefore I conclude against pluralitie men thus 1 Whatsoeuer is established and distinguished by the Lord himselfe the same may not be taken away or vnited by man 2 But Churches that is to saye assemblyes and societies of the Lordes people pastours of these assemblies and liuings for the pastours of these assemblies are established and distinguished by the Lord himselfe 3 Therefore Churches that is to say assemblyes of people pastors and liuings for pastors may not be taken away or vnited by man THE Minor proposition of which Syllogisme to euerye man not minded to cauill at these wordes Established and distinguished is infallible and not to bee denyed for though boundes and lymittes of certayne parrishes are bordered out by man and that a certayne number of people called to make one Congregation and to heare at one time in one place one certayne pastour bee at the rule and disposition of man yet that these thinges shoulde be thus done is the speciall commaundement of the Lord. Moreouer when as this thing shal be once thus performed by man according to the Lords commaundement it shal be is lawfull for man again where the congregation is too great to make the same lesse and where it is too litle to make the same greater and in this sence I graunt that as it is lawful for man to establish distinguish so it is lawfull for man to take away and to vnite Churches and liuings But because this is not the meaning of pluralists for that they wil haue one pastor to be placed ouer many Congregations many congregations to finde one pastor many bodies to haue one head one head to haue many bodies many flocks to haue one shepheard one sheepheard to haue manie flocks Therfore mine argumēt without any cauil remaineth firm against thē And for these considerations as before so againe I deny the consequence made by plurified men for the possessing of manye benefices by one man For though by coullor of lawe they pretend right vnto them yet the law indeed yeeldeth them no such aduantage because dispensations for many benefices and parish Churches with cure of soules generally graunted are and ought by law to be vtterly voide and of none effecte as partly hath bin prooued and more at large appeareth by that that followeth Glos 1. q. 7. c. requiritis Dispensatio est iuris communis relaxatio faecta cum causae cognitione ab eo qui ius habet dispensandi A dispensation is a relaxation or release of common right graunted by him that hath power to dispence hauing first taken knowledge of the cause thereof that is hauing considered whether there bee iust cause to mooue him to graunt a priuiledge or dispensation against cōmon right or no. By which definition it is euident that Dispensare is diuersa pensare nam omnia quae ad causae cognitionem pertinent pensare debet qui Dispensare vult To Dispence is to ponder diuers thinges for he that will Dispence ought to waygh and to consider all those thinges which pertayne to the knowledge of the cause In which discriptions three thinges are principally requisite necessary First the person or iudge that hath authoritie to dispence Secondly the causes for the which dispensations may be graunted And lastly an examination or discussion of those causes So that if any dispensation or facultie whatsoeuer shall be graunted either A non Iudice by one that is no iudge either without a lawfull cause or lastly without aspeciall triall and sifting of that same lawfull cause before it passe euery such dispensation by a necessary consequence is meerely voyde because euery such dispensation agreeth not to the definition of a dispensation and therefore can not be the thing defined Glos extrauagant de prebend dignit c. execrabilis ver vltima Concerning the partie that hath power and authoritie to graunt dispensations and to take knowledge of the lawfulnesse of the causes requisite to make dispensations goodland auailable the same in this Realme is the Archdishop of Caunterbury H. 8. and vppon his refusall then such as hir highnesse shall appoynt to that office according to the forme of a statute prouided in that behalfe And therefore touching his person thus appoynted to be Iudge I conclude from the generall to the speciall as before that because the positiue lawes of man against pluralities are all grounded either vpon the law of nature or vpon the law of God And because as the lawes of nature and the lawes of God are immutable so shoulde the same positiue lawes remayne stable and vnchaungeable that therefore the Archbishop of Caunterbury beeing a man hath no more right to giue a dispensation againste the positiue lawes of man made againste pluralities then he hath to giue a dispensation againste the law of nature or against the law of God Glos extra de vot c. non est ver authoritate Extra de concel preb proposuit ver supra c. cum ad monasterium ex de statu monocho For sayth the glose in one place No dispensation against the law of nature or against the lawe of God is tollerable no not by the Pope him selfe As touching the causes wherevppon the sayde Archbishop or other officers should and ought be mooued by remitting the rigour of common right to graunt immunities and dispensations they are two fold One consisteth in the dignitie and worthinesse of the persons the other in the waightinesse of certayne speciall causes Vnto what maner of persons dispensatiōs ought to be
maruailously wounded grieued and molested and that the soules of the people are therby not gouerned at all but left at randon to their owne direction hauing no guyde to conduct them euery one may euydently discerne dispensations in that behalfe to be altogeather intollerable hauing no ground nor foundation of reason equity or lawe but onely graunted for the priuate gayne and lucre of some couetous vaine glorious persons Wheras it may be answered that the statutes of the Realme licensing diuers Ecclesiasticall persons qualified either by degree of schoole or by seruice vnto nobilitie ought more to be respected in this behalfe then the reasons of the Canon law Herevnto I answere that for my part I heartely desire and pray vnto God that these lawes might be respected and that the law of Englande might rule an English man in this case But alas our lawes are bels without clappers they are founded but they sound not they are bandes but they binde not For thogh by the statutes of the realm certain noble mens chappleines and others graduated in the Vniuersities be qualified made capable of dispensatiōs yet I deny the laws of this realm to approue any maner of dispēsations tollerable at al for any kind of these qualified men vnles the same be Frst in cases of necessity for the peace of the cōmon weal Secondly in cases of conueniency for the honor of hir highnesse person and lastly warranted by the holy scriptures lawes of god For though the statute make some men fit men for the Archb. to work vpon and as it were anuiles for him to strike vpon yet the same statute imposeth no necessity for the B. to work without the word But if it be lawful by the word then by the law he may if he wil. But if it be vnlawful by the word thē he may not thogh he would The law followeth Be it enacted that neither the king his heires and successors kinges of this realme nor any of their subiectes of this realm nor of the kinges dominions shall from thence foorth sue to the sea of Rome or vnto any person or persons hauing or pretending any authoritie by the same for licences dispensations impositions faculties grauntes rescriptes delegacies instruments or other writings of what kind name c. for the which any licence dispensation composition faculty graunt rescript delegacie instrument or other wryting heretofore hath ben vsed and accustomed to be had and obtayned at the sea of Rome or by authority therof or of any prelate of this realm nor of any maner of other licenses dispensatiōs compositions faculties grauntes rescriptes delegacies or any other instruments or writinges that in cases of necessity may lawfully be graunted without offending holy scriptures lawes of God but that from henceforth euery such licence c. aforenamed mentioned necessary for your highnes your heires or successors your their people and subiects vpon the due examination of the causes qualities of the persons procuring such dispensations licenses c. shal be granted had obtained frō time to time within this your realm other your dominions not els where in maner and form following no otherwise that is to say the Arch. of canterbury for the time being his successors shall haue power authority frō time to time by their discretions to giue grant dispose by an instrument vnder the seal of the said Archb. vnto your Maiesty and to your heires successors kings of this realm as well all maner such licenses dispensations faculties grants rescripts delegacies instruments all other writings for cases not being cōtrary or repugnant to the holy scriptures lawes of God as heretofore hath ben accustomed to be had obtained by your Highn or any your most noble progenitors or any of yours or their subiectes at the sea of Rome or any person or persons by authority of the same al other licences dispensatiōs faculties c. in for vpon al such causes matters as shal be conuenient and necessary to be had for the honor surety of your highnes your heires successors and the wealth profit of this your realm so that the said Archb. or any his successors in no maner wise shall graunt any dispensation licence rescript or any other writing afore rehearsed for any cause or matter repugnant to the law ofalmighty god This act is renued 1. Elizab. Prouided alwaies that this act nor any thing or things therin cōtained shal be hereafter interpreted or expounded that your grace your nobles subiects intend by the same to decline or vary frō the congregation of christ his church in any thing concerning the verye articles of the catholique faith of Christendome or in any other thinges declared by holy scripture and the word of God necessary for your and their saluations but onely to make an ordinance by policie necessarye and conuenient to represse vice and for good conseruation of this Realme in peace vnitie and tranquilitie from rauyne and spoyle In which Act is set foorth vnto vs what great care and circumspection our auncestors in the twilight of the Gospel had for the abolishing of corruptions the establishing of a sincere gouernment both in the Church and common weale and how diligently and faithfully they prouided that no maner of dispensatiōs licenses or immunities shold be had or obtayned but in cases of necessitie in cases not contrary or repugnant to the lawes of God in cases wherin the wealth profit peace and conseruation of the realm requireth in cases conuenient for the honor safety of the kings person with a due confideration alwaies of the causes qualities for the which of the persons to whom any licence or immunity shold be granted And therfore out of this statute first I conclude thus against plurified men 1 Whatsoeuer cause or matter is repugnant to the law of God the Archb. may not dispence with the same 2 But the matter of hauing many benefices or being Non residents is repugnant to the laws of God 3 Therfore the Archbish may not dispence with the same Againe 1 Whatsoeuer is not necessary for the wealth peace profite and conseruation of the realm the same by this statute is forbidden 2 But that one man should enioy by way of dispensation from the Archbish liuings appointed for many men is not necessary for the wealth peace profite and conseruation of the realme 3 Therefore the same is forbidden by this statute Lastly 1 Whatsoeuer is not conuenient for the honour and safety of hir highnes person the same by this statute is forbidden 2 But it is not conuenient for the honor and safety of hir highnes person to haue the Archbish disspence for many benefices 3 Therefore by this statute the Archbish is forbidden to dispence c. THe Minor proposition of the first syllogisme hath beene already sufficiently prooued by manye in fallible conclusions of Lawe and vndoubted truethes
of the worde of God and therefore it is needelesse to make any repetition thereof Onely I would haue the reader diligently to marke the wordes of the Statute forbidding all manner of Dispensations in any matter or cause repugnant to the worde of God For though the aduersary cauill that we finde not in the scriptures these Termes Viz. Licenses Tollerations Dispensations c. precisely specified in any commaundement prohibitory in the Scriptures Yet in as much as the matter or cause of Dispensations for many benefices is there generally forbidden as ambition pride couetousnes perill of soules c. It is against the peace profit of the common weale that the Archb. should dispence Therefore it followeth that by this statute Dispensations in this case are absolutely inhibited The minor proposition of the second Syllogism may be confirmed by three euident reasons First from the euent which by our owne common and daily experience we too too well knowe to be true For by the same we see a fewe wealthy and ritch Prelates in pride iolity to be maintained and a great number of needy Stipendary Curates and poore Ministers to be vtterly destitute of meete and conuenient allowaunces so that sometimes after theire dissease their distressed wiues and Children are forced eyther to bee releeued by the seuerall Parishes of their aboades to the impouerishing of the same parishes or else constrained to beg from place to place so be chastised as rogues or pilfer steal and so be punished as fellons Secondly by a comparison drawn from other Statutes of the realme prouiding that one rich and mighty man shoulde not exercise many seueral misteries trades and faculties and so rob the poorer sort from the ordinary meanes wherby they might liue well and honestly in the common wealth The third reason is taken from an adiunct or common accident to euery common weal rightly gouerned that is that the last Willes and Testamentes of all and singular testators be duely execued especiallye such as whereby the honour of God is promoted the Church and common weale manifestly regarded but vnto the performaunce of the the last Willes and Testaments of many patrons endowing many churches with large and ample possessions to the intent conuenient liuinge might be alwayes prouided for Pastors to be resiaunt and to feede their posterity with the foode of life the worde of God there can be nothing more preiudiciall or more derogatory then that these seuerall patrimonies and inheritaunces appointed by seuerall patrons for seuerall Pastors to such seuerall and good vses shoulde by the dispensation of one man be transformed and giuen to another vse contrary to the testator his intent and purpose And therefore I confirme my Minor Proposition by these three conclusions 1 Whatsoeuer is an occasion that poore and needy Ministers their wiues and children do want a competent conuenient maintainance the same is not necessary for the profite peace wealth and conseruation of the common weale 2 But that one man shoulde by dispensation enioy many benefices is an occasion that pore and needy Ministers their wiues and Children doe want a competent and conuenient maintainance 3 Therfore that one man should by dispensation enioy many benefices is not necessary for the profit peace wealth and conseruation of the common weale 1 Whatsoeuer is an occasion that one man shoulde enioy the offices liuings of many men the same is not necessary for the peace profite wealth and conseruation of the common weale 2 But that one man should by dispensation enioy many benefices is an occasion that one man should enioy the offices and liuings of many men 3 Therefore that one man should enioy by dispensation many benefices is not necessarye for the peace profite wealth and conseruation of the common wealth 1 Whatsoeuer is preiudiciall and derogatory to the last willes and testaments of Testators disposing their patrimony to lawfull holy vses the same is not necessary for the peace profite wealth and conseruation of the Realme 2 But that one man by dispensation shoulde enioy many benefices is preiudiciall and derogatory to such last Willes and Testaments 3 Therefore that one man by dispensation shoulde enioy many benefices is not necessarye for the peace profite wealth and conseruation of the Realme It is inconuenient for the honor safety of her highnesse person for the Archb. to dispence COncerning the validitye of the Minor proposition of my third syllogisme drawne from the conueniencie of her highnesse honor namely that it is not conuenient for the honour and suerty of her Highnes person to leaue any manner of authority for the Archb. to dispence none may wel doubt therof but only such as respect more the pomp and glory of an Archb. then the dignity preeminence of a Christian King For in good soth this statute made principally to abolish al vsurped power challēged by a forrē Romish pope ouer the king his subiects yet to authorise a domestical English Archb. in his roome containeth in it such a contrariety such an absurdity as it is wonder how either any Archb. durst challenge the executiō thereof or else how hir highnesse most noble Father brother her highnes own person could endure the same so long vncanselled vnrepealed especiallye the same being most preiudiciall to their regall crownes and dignities For first by the vertue of this Statute it is enioyned the Archb. and his successours in no manner wise to graunt any dispensation licence rescript or any other writing for anye cause or matter repugnaunt to the lawe of Almighty God Secondly it is permitted vnto the sayde Archbysh and his successours by their discretions to graunt vnto the K. Maiestie and to his heires and successours Kings of this Realme all manner such licenses c. as heretofore haue beene accustomed to bee had and obtayned by his Highnesse or any his Noble Progenitors or any his subiectes at the sea of Rome Which two clauses without dishonour to the Maiesty of God or preiudice to her highnesse prerogatiue cannot possible establish a sound and perfect Lawe For first in as much as the popes person was neuer duly qualified to be a Lawfull dispensor or any lawfull Magistrate in the Church of God it is manifest that euery dispensation granted at that time at the sea of Rome was directly against the Lawe of God as graunted by one that was no member of the Church of God Again In as much as the trueth of the Gospell warranteth vs that symony Vsury Periury Adultery Incest Nonresidency many benefices Marriages against the Leuiticall Law obseruations of superstitious dayes and times not eating of flesh in Lent and such like are against the Lawe of God it is euident that dispensations graunted at that time for these and such like things at the Sea of Rome were granted in causes and matters repugnant to the law of God and so by the former braunch of this statute being
concerning the pouerty of certaine persons pretended and alleaged in defence of dispensations for many benefices that because the reuenewes and profites of one benefice is now adayes not a competent and sufficient maintenance for a minister his wife and familie that therefore in respecte of suche pouertye they are necessarye and to be borne withall I aunswere herein firste with Rebuffus the Lawyer that Licet quis sit pauper c. Rebuff de dispens ad plu benefi Though one be poore and suppose two benefices to be very necessary and profitable for him yet for this cause the Pope maye not dispence But if it be necessary or profitable for the Churche to haue a teacher to instruct mainteine and defend the same then shall a dispensation be lawfull Secondly that whosoeuer hath taken vpon him a charge with a poore living and stipend belonging to the same ought by law to content him selfe therwith and notin respect of any pouerty to seeke to haue many liuings thereby to better his estate or augment his liuing For the lawe in trueth is as followeth 32. q. 5. c. horrendus Qui inodicum recepit beneficium c. He that hath receaued a smale benefice hath preiudiced him selfe therefore let him seeke his liuing by his owne craft because whatsoeuer hath once pleased him ought not any more to displease him 70. distinct sanctorum And let euery one walke in that vocation whereunto he is called and let him do according to the example of the Apostle saying these handes haue ministred vnto me al things that were wanting 21. q. 1. c. primo glos extra de rescrip c. si proponente ver minus ff 91. distinct qui autem And let him that is forbidden to get his liuing by filthy lucre and vnhonest marchaundise haue a stipend of the oblations offerings of the Church but in case the Church be not sufficient let him after the example of the Apostle who liued by the worke of his hands get by his owne industry or husbandry those thinges that are necessary Out of these lawes against dispensations graunted vnto pryuate persons in respect of priuate necessity I conclude thus 1 If priuate necessytie or pouerty were a sufficient cause to enioy a dispensation for many benefices then shoulde priuate necessity haue bene warraunted by law hereunto 2 But priuate necessitie or pouerty is not warranted by law to be anye sufficient cause for a dispensation 3 Therefore the necessitie or pouertye of a priuate person is not a sufficient cause for a dispensatioÌ„ THe first proposition is grounded vppon the verie nature and essence of a dispensation for the same being as is said before of the nature of a priuelege can not otherwise be graunted then vpon a iust cause ratified by law The second propositioÌ„ being a general proposition negatiue of the law cannot better be manifested then by a special repetitioÌ„ of the things permitted by lawe according to this rule Quod in quibusdam permittitur in caeteris prohibetur That which is permitted in some certaine things the same in other thinges is forbidden And therefore the lawe allowing either vrgent necessitie and euident vtilitye of the Churche or some excellent quallities of the minde or discent from some auncient parentage to be onely causes of dispensation excludeth all other causes whatsoeuer And as touching necessitie and pouertie of priuate persons the lawe absolutely appointeth other meanes to releeue the same then by way of dispensation Neyther can it bee found in the whole bodie of law that pouerty a lone is any sufficient cause to procure a dispensation for many benefices For the law accounteth him alwayes to haue a competency and sufficiency 12 q. 1 c. Episcopus vers q. 2 c. episcopus which hath Victum vestitum meate drincke and apparrell which is proued thus luxta sanctum Apostolum fic dicentem habentes victum vestitum hiis contenti simus according to the saying of the Apostle hauing foode and apparrell let vs content our selues with that And here we learne both what he that hath taken vnto him selfe a charge hauing but a smale stipend annected thereunto ought to do in case it be not sufficient that is that he ought to labour and trauaile with his owne handes in some honest handy craft and also what by lawe is reputed and taken to be a competent sufficient maintaynance euen foode and apparell Moreouer if a man willingly and without compulsion enter into a charge knowing before hand the stipend due vnto him for his trauell to be small he may not Lawefullye afterwardes complayne but it is whollye to bee imputed to his owne negligence and follye that he was no more circumspect better to prouide for him self at the first If a man knowing a woman to haue led a loose and dissolute life take her to his Wife hee cannot for her former misdemeanour giue her afterwards a Byll of Diuorcement Quod semel approbani iterum reprobare non possum That which once I haue approued and allowed I cannot afterwardes disproue and disalowe Neyther in truethe for ought that euer I perceyued by the want of any Pluralitie man if hee rightlye examine his owne Conscyence can hee pretend any necâ—ssity and want of lyuing for himselfe to bee anye iust cause of his foule disorder herein May Caietane Cardinall of Brygit whose Annuall reuenewes by his Cardinalship amounte to the Summe of two Hundred pounds maye the same Cardinall whose Annuall profites of his Prebend in another Churche amounte to the Summe of two Hundred Markes Maye the same Cardinall whose annuall Reuenewes of his Archdeaconarye in another Churche amounte to the Summe of Fortye Poundes May the same Cardinall whose Annuall Reuenewes of his owne and his Wiues Patrimonye amounte to the Summe of Fiftye Pound complayne iustly that hee standeth in neede of sufficient liuing to mayntayne himselfe his Wife and two or three Children and thereuppon purchase to him selfe a License to retayne a Benefice from the which hee receyueth yeerely one hundred Markes May a Cardinall I say thus furnished with so manye ecclesiasticall Dignities affirme safely with a good Conscience that hee wanteth and standeth in neede of a conuenient liuing Nay maye not the Lordes people rather crye out agaynste this intollerable Ambition Rauyne and spoyle Yea maye not the common weale yea doth it not feele to hirr ruine the miserable pouertie and pâ—…urie of his stipendarie Curate vpon whom he thinketh to haue bestowed a large and bountifull rewarde for his seruice in the ministery towardes the maintenance of him his wyfe and family when as his farmer shall paye him by the yeare ten or twelue pounds at the vtmost Is this tollerable by lawe No no the pretence of pouertie that this man his fellow Cardinal hauing Church vppon Church a personage vpon his prouostship do make to be a cloake for their worldlines can neuer shrowd it selfe so couertly but their iniustice by lawe may
the popish Synagogue vntill the year of our Lord 1295. as the Canons before mencioned doe witnesse for this cause and in this respect onely are these former lawes to be put in execution and the former custome is to be abrogated The lawes woulde bee kept because in effect they containe the purity of the truth the custome woulde be left because the same degenerateth from the simplicity and practise of the former times and is but a meere corruption and a lawlesse deuise of a lawlesse Pope Boniface the eight And that euery one may be well and thoroughly instructed touching the reasons of the lawes following to ouerthrow the former custome hee is diligently to consider that as the Papistical synagogue always fashioned framed her selfe in obedience to her King his lawes and euermore liked that that her King liked and misliked that that he misliked so the congregation of Christe hath alwayes humbled herselfe vnto the will and pleasure of her Lorde and King Christe she hath consented to that onely that hath beene pleasaunt in his sight and hath dissented from whatsoeuer was displeasing vnto him euery one ought to consider that the Popes clergy are not the Lordes people their errours cannot agree with our trueth their ignorance with our knowledge their furie with our peace their deuill with our God their Beliall with our Christ And therefore though the foresayde custome be begon and still continued in the popishe synagogue as ratified by the secret consent of the popes subiectes Yet the same custome ought not eyther to be begone or to be continued in the Churche of Christ as indeede a custome neuer yet by the consent of the Lord himselfe nor any his faithful seruaÌ„ts approued to be any whit expedieÌ„t or necessarie for the good gouernment of his church And hauing thus layde this foundation it is farther to be vnderstoode that euery reasonable custome euerie custome not erronious and lawfully prescribed ought to haue these properties following The firste is this viz. It must be begon and continued ff de leg l. sed et Tacita ciuium conuentione by a secret couenaunt of the citizens agreeing together a long time and by many yeares vsing the same and doing some certayne actes therein For Gloss institu de iure natur § sine script ver consensu consuetudo est quasi communis assuetudo A custom is as it were a coÌ„mon vsage vnto which vse the consent of the people is necessarie and therefore error being contrarie to consent euermore hindereth and letteth a custome Extr. de Do. contumâ— c. 1. Consuetudo quae apud quosdam irrepserat impodire non debet quo minus preualeat veritas vincat A custome crept in amongst certaine ought not to hinder that the trueth preuayle not and ouercome And therfore though the Popes cleargie a long time and by many yeeres passed haue obserued and vsed this custome and haue secretly couenaunted giuen their consent and by their silence haue agreed together that Byshopps and other chiefe officers in their synagogues hauing iurisdiction might excommunicate alone yet the authoritie gotten after this sort by those Byshops in the time of papistrie doth little aduauntage or profit our Byshops in the time of the Gospell For what preiudice can the couenaunt of the popishe Clergye worke against the Citizens of the Lord the professours of the Gospel For though those Byshops haue vsed this authoritie by the space well nighe of three hundred yeares what is that to our Byshops who haue not had the vse possession and light of the Gospell scarcelye threescore yeares in whiche time too there hath beene a continuall outcry made by the Lords seruants against this abuse and a contynuall clayme for the restitution of the Lords owne order that the Lords people might be gouerned and ruled according to his ordinances And therefore that this custome cannot binde the Lords seruauntes I conclude thus 1 They who haue not secretly consented to this custome are not bounde by this custome 2 But the seruaunts of the Lord haue not secretely consented to this custome ff de legib l. de quibus 3 Therefore they are not bound by this custome THe first proposition is the lawe it selfe the second proposition I confirme thus At the beginninge of this custome it is euideÌ„t that the family of the Lord was very smale and the same oppressed in captiuity it beeing in seruitude and bondage coulde not freelye giue any secreat consent to any gouerment all manner of gouenrment beeing violently taken from them And as touching the time since the publishing of the gopsel how far they haue beene from yelding any priuie consent hitherto as well both the open and publicke protestations by the preachinges and writings of manye notable men in the churches with vs as also the vse practice of all reformed churches els where doe manyfest the cleane contrary to the whole world by means whereof the Byshops vnder the Gospell though they haue hitherto vsed authority to excommunicate alone yet therby haue they not gayned any iust title interest or dominioÌ„ therunto For that as yet they haue neuer proued themselues to haue any quiet and peaceable possession of this their iurisdiction and therefore cannot vse this pretensed custome as a lawfull defence against their bretherne and fellow seruaunts Cod de prescript â—rigi vel quadra anni l. si quis l. vlt. Extra de prescript c. sanctorum CONSVETVDO siue possessio debet esse pacifica non violenta sine interruptione ad hoc vt prescriptio locuÌ„ habeat A custome or possession ought to be peaceable not forced without interruption to the end prescription may take place And therfore I conclude againste this custome thus 1 Euerie vnpeaceable forced custom is an vnlawfull custome 2 But this custome that one should excommunicat alone is an vnpeaceable a forced custome 3 Therefore this custome is an vnlawfull custome THe first proposition is the law the second propositioÌ„ our knowledge experieÌ„ce teacheth vs euideÌ„tly inough for though this custome be peaceable in the popish synagogue yet it followeth not that the same therfore is peaceable in the church of Christe For the quiet possession of the predecessor is not coÌ„tinued vnto the successor or any whit aduantageth the successor vnles the successor challeÌ„ge his possession by the same cause by the same title that his predecessor did If the same will in his persoÌ„ continue the possession of his AuÌ„cestor so by prescriptioÌ„ atcheiue the dominioÌ„ or proprieti of any thing he must coÌ„tinue the possessioÌ„ by the same title that his AuÌ„cestor begaÌ„ the possessioÌ„ And therfore sitheÌ„ce our Byshops vnder the gospell the popish Bishops by fictioÌ„ of law be one the selfe same persoÌ„ therfore by al inteÌ„ts coÌ„structioÌ„s of law must of necessity vse the self same title for the continuaunce of their possession and the prescription of their custome one of
gouerment and not vppon the worde of God and that the lawe before was contrary yea and is contrarye still where noe suche custome hath beene so prescribed I conclude that in the beginning it was not so and therefore contrary to the commaundement of God and therfore vnreasonable and therefore no custome but a corruption Euerye custome must be lawfully prescribed The second property of euery good and laudable custome in the Church is that the same be rightly and lawfully prescribed otherwise it shall loose the nature of a custome and be of no force to binde And to such a custome these two thinges are necessarily requyred Glos extra de consuetud c. cum quanto First the same must be begun Sciente illo qui ius potest condere With the knowledge and consent of him that hath power to make a law Secondly it must not be Contra neruum ecclesiasticae disciplinae libertatem ecclesiae Against the ioyntes and sinewes of ecclesiasticall discipline and liberty of the Church Touching the former we are first to consider the state and condition of Pope Boniface whether he as a lawfull king gouernour or ruler had power and authoritie to inact and publishe a law in the Church of Christ or no For had he no authoritie to make a law in the Church of Christe then by the foresayd maxime it followeth that he had no authoritie to confirme or establish a custome Now it is manifest that the Popes kingdome is an vsurped kingdome that his power is not lawfully deriued vnto him by the word of the Lord that it is a kingdome more opposite and altogeather contrary to the kingdome of Christ that it proclaymeth doctrines against the doctrines of our Lord Christ that it vrgeth traditions against his commaundements that it inuenteth new sacrifices and disanulleth his onely and all sufficient sacrifice that it is externall and consisteth in outward pompes rites and ceremonies whereas the kingdome of our Lord Christ is spirituall and consisteth in the renuing the inner man If then there be such diuision and dissention betweene these two kingdoms because of the diuers gouernments of these two kinges I terme the Pope a king onely in respect of his vsurped kingdome the one gouerning his subiects by the sword of the spirite the worde of God the other gouerning his adherents by the inuentions of men and traditions of his owne braine it standeth vs the faithfull seruaunts and subiects of the Lord Christ in hand that as we are exempted by his grace and power from the bondage of our enemy so to exempt our selues also frō acknowledging any power to bee in his aduersary to make a lawe or to establish a custome for vs to be ruled gouerned by And as the papist to manifest his obedience to the Pope will affirme this custome to bee avayleable in the gouernement of the popishe churche and to bee good as brought in by the knowledge of their King the Pope so it standeth vpon our allegiaunce and fidelitie to our King Iesus Christ not to confesse this custome to bee commendable but as it is so to account the same altogether corrupt as beeing not brought into the Church with the knowledge of the same our King who hath only power to make a law in his Church but rather foysted in by the power of an vsurper contrarye to our saide King his expresse will and commaundement In deede if our Byshops and other Church gouernours were popish bysh acknowledged the Pope for their general superintendēt and that he had power to make a law they might then seeme to haue some reason by alleadging this custome for their defence neither could I then deny the vse and authority thereof vnto them But the case standeth otherwise with them Our Byshops pretend thēselues to bee enimyes vnto the Popes vsurped power they would bee no maineteyners of his authority they confesse not him to haue power to make a law they account and repute him to be meere Antichrist Yea our Byshops are ministers of the Gospell they are dispensers of the worde of God they bee Legates from the Lord Christ to declare his good pleasure to his people And therefore the state of our question is otherwise and standeth thus namely whether a custome begun and continued in the synagogue of Antichrist with the knowledge of him that in that synagogue had power to make a Lawe bee a good and a laudable custome for the Church of Christ being begun continued without the knowledge of the Lorde Christe And whether the ministers of the Gospell may safely challenge the vse or benefite of any such custome in the ministery of the Gospell or no Whereunto I aunswere and that by Lawe negatiuely For making the Kingdome of our Lorde Iesus Christe and the ministery of his Gospell to bee as it is indeede a Kingdome of power and grace and to bee a Kingdome opposite and contrary to the kingdome of Antichrist I say that there can be no custome brought into his Churche nor practised by the ministers of his Gospell vnlesse the same bee broughte in by the knoweledge and consent of their Lorde and King Iesus Christe who onely hath power to make a lawe for them to be gouerned by And that therefore vnlesse it may be iustified that this custome namely that one shoulde excommunicate alone was brought in with the knowledge and consent of our Lorde Iesus Christe I say that by Lawe this custome is a voide custome And therefore I conclude thus 1 Euery custome begunne and continued in the Church of Christe without the knowledge and consent of Christe who onely in his Churche hath power to make a Law is no custome lawfully prescribed 2 But this custome namely that one should excommunicate alone is begun and continued without the knowledge and consente of Iesus Christe 3 Therefore this custome is not lawfullye prescribed And agayne That this custome namely that one shoulde excommunicate alone is agaynste the force of ecclesiasticall Discipline and the liberty of the church and therefore not auaylable I prooue as followeth 1 Whatsoeuer is agaynste the policye of the Churche of Christe instituted by God for the wholesome administration and gouernment thereof the same is agaynst the force and power of ecclesiasticall Discipline 2 But this custome namely that one shoulde excommunicate alone is agaynste the policy of the Churche of Christe instituted by God c. 3 Therefore this custome is against the force of ecclesiasticall discipline THe firste Proposition is playne and euidente from the definition or discription of ecclesiasticall Discipline defined to bee Christianae Ecclesiae politia à deo illius vectè administrandae gubernandaeque causa instituta The pollicy of the Church of Christ instituted by God for the good administration and gouernment of the same So that whatsoeuer may bee sayde to bee contrary or repugnaunt vnto this forme and manner of Christian pollicy the same consequently may bee affirmed to bee contrarye and
repugnaunt vnto Christian Discipline the sayde policie contayning the very whole and entire nature essence of the saide discipline therfore the one conuertible with the other as the very true and essentiall definition with the very thing it selfe defined The second proposition I prooue by two conclusions 1 Whatsoeuer is the onely policy of the Church of Rome the same is the pollicy of the Church of Antichriste 2 But that one by custome should excommunicate alone is the onely policye of the Churche of Rome 3 Therefore the policy of the Church of Antichrist and if of Antichrist then not of Christ for there is no communion betweene lighte and darkenesse between Christe and Belyall THat the pollicy of the Church of Rome which is my first proposition is the pollicy of Antichriste is euident inasmuch as the Church of Rome teaching for doctrines the traditions of men and hauing her mouth open to blasphemy against GOD and to blaspheme his name and his Tabernacle and them that dwell in Heauen is the Church of Antichrist The second proposition shall be prooued with the second proposition of the Syllogisme following My second reason is 1 Whatsoeuer is not instituted by God for the gouernment of the Church of Christe the same is not the pollicy of the Church of Christe 2 But a custome whereby one should Excommunicate alone is not instituted by God for the gouerment of the Church of Christe 3 Therefore the sayde custome is not the pollicy of the Church of Christ THe first Proposition is drawn from the essence nature of the pollicy of the Church of Christ for that no other pollicy can bee the pollicy of the church of Christ than that pollicy which is instituted by God the Lorde and Father of Christe for God is the onely head of Christe and the lawe giuer vnto Christe for whatsoeuer I haue receiued saith Christe that haue I cōmanded you And that which I receiued of the Lord saith the Apostle that I haue deliuered vnto you Now it is manifest that both our Sauiour Christe his Apostle 1. Cor. 5. 4. 5. Mat. 18. 16. 17 18. deliuered a policie vnto the Church of Christe for the gouernement thereof namely excommunication by many and therfore that excommunication by many is instituted by God for the gouernement of the Churche of Christe cannot bee denyed And if excommunication by manye bee commaunded by God then excommunication by one alone is forbidden by God The second proposition I proue thus 1 Whatsoeuer is the tradition and inuention of man the same is not the institution of God 2 But a custome wherebye one shoulde excommucate alone is a tradition and inuention of man 3 Therefore the same is not the institution of God THe first proposition is manyfest by infinite places of Scriptures especially by the doctrine of our Sauiour in the fiftenth after Mathew where hee proueth that the Pharisees reprehending his disciples for not keeping the traditions of the Elders in washinge their hands haue made the cōmandemēnt of God of noe aucthority by their owne tradition manifestinge thereby that in vain they worshipped him teaching for doctrines mens preceptes The second proposition of this syllogisme with the second proposition of the former syllogisme is proued by the decree of Boneface the eyght before alleadged which Boniface was a man was a Pope and Gouernour in the Church of Rome was an enimy to the institution ordinance of God And therfore against the force and vertue of the sayde custome as not lawfully prescribed and therefore not hauing sufficient power and authoritie of an equall iust vnwritten law beeing brought into the Church about three hundred yeares passed and that by the ratification of Boniface the eyght an enemy vnto the church I conclude thus 1 No custome against the force of ecclesiasticall discipline can bee a custome lawfully prescribed for the law warranteth no such custome 2 But this custome namely that one shold excōmunicate alone is against ecclesiasticall discipline 3 Therefore this custome can not be a custome lawfully prescribed And therfore a meere and manifest corruption THE first proposition is the lawe it selfe The seconde proposition hath beene prooued from the definition of Ecclesiasticall discipline And therefore our sole customarie excommunicatours shall come to late to deny the conclusion I made mention before of one other condition properly incident and inherent to euery custome lawfully prescribed namely that the same shoulde not be againste the libertye of the Church of Christe Nowe that this custome namely that one should excommunicate alone is also against the liberty of the Church And therefore not lawfully prescribed I proue thus 1 Whatsoeuer is against the libertye of the congregation of the faithfull the same is againste the liberty of the Church 2 But a custome whereby one shoulde excommunicate alone is against the liberty of the congregation of the faithfull 3 Therefore the same is againste the liberty of the Church THe first proposition is euidēt because the church comprehendeth the congregation of the faithful Ecclesia congregationem fidelium comprehendit And here according to the supposition of the lawe and according to the meaning of the same lawe whereof I intreate I argue from the generall to the particular thus 1 If for the Pope challenging vnto him selfe absolute power and authoritie ouer the vniuersall Church to excommunicate alone shoulde be contrary to the liberty of the whole societie of the faithfull and so of the Church in generall then for a Bishop challenging vnto him selfe authoritye ouer the particular Churche with in his particular Diocesse to excommunicate alone is contrary to the libertye of the particular societie of the faithfull and so of the particular Church within his Diocesse 2 But the first is not lawfull 3 Therefore the second not lawfull FOR Quod iuris est in toto quoad totum idem est in parte quoad partem What right there is from the whole vnto the whole the same right is from the part vnto the part Againe that this custome namely for one man to excommunicate alone in one place is against the liberty of the Church in one place which is my seconde proposition I prooue from the essence and nature of liberty Libertas saith the lawyer ff de statu ho. l. libertas est naturalis facultas eius quod cuique facere libet nisi quod vi aut iure prohibetur Libertie is a naturall faculty to doe that that euerye man is willing to doe vnlesse by force or Lawe he be restrayned By which definition though the Lawyer haue properly defined the onely liberty of a reasonable and naturall man and not of the spirituall and regenerate man yet by the selfe same definition maye appeare what the freedome of a man new borne ought to bee namely such a gratious liberty as whereby he might thoroughly without restraynt performe whatsoeuer he woulde in the spirituall seruice of the Lorde vnlesse by violence
that drowneth him selfe with the waues of the worlde is to be remooued from his Ecclesiasticall ministerie 2 But euery bishop and euery Clearke that vseth ciuile iurisdiction to please the Potentates of the worlde drowneth him selfe with the waues of the world 3 Therefore euery bishop and euery Clearke that vseth ciuile iurisdiction is to be remooued from his ministerie IF such as seeme by coullour of lawe to iustifie the heaping of offices one vppon an others necke had known these constitutions no doubt though had they couertly desired an outward pompe yet neuer woulde they so openly haue maintayned a thing so manifestly forbidden so precisely disallowed by so many lawes A minister may more lawfully exercise an occupation then a ciuile office For the wordes of the Apostle Nemo militans Deo implicet se negotiis secularibus Are not onely applyed by the law to manuall trades and occupations as to be a plough man a marchant man a Baker or a Brwer but also to the cheefest offices vnder Kings and Emperors as of Vicounts Stewards Presidents Iustices of peace and such like for the law foreseeing that a B. or clergie man whose office ought to bee applied wholely in heauenly things thorowly to bee withdrawen from earthly things might not onely be hindred from executing his duety by beeing a Baker or Huckster or other handy craftesman but also by taking of him the office of a Vicount Steward or Iustice of peace these offices beeing of them selues sufficient for a whole mā to be imploied in vseth the reason of the Apostle as well against the one as against the other And in truth more properly and directly against the one then against the other in so much as if wee conferre other places of holy Scripture with this of the holy Apostles wee shall finde that it is tollerable for a Minister yea hee may exercise his hands in laboure and toyle of his body to get some part of his lyuing in case hee haue not by the congregation allowaunce sufficient to mainetaine his estate the same Apostle leauing an example thereof as appeareth to the Thessalonians 4. 3. Neyther tooke wee breade sayth hee of any man for naught but wee wroughte with our laboure and trauayle Night and Day because wee woulde not bee chargeable to anye of you And agayne Act. 20. 34. 35. You knowe that these handes haue ministred to my necessityes and to them that were with mee If therefore euerye minister so it bee no hinderaunce to his calling and that he haue no sufficient prouision may for the preseruation of him selfe family exercise some manuall occupation laboure with his bodye sithence wee finde not in the whole doctrine of the Gospell that any liberty is giuen to the minister to become a Magestrate Rom. 12. 7. but that euery one that hath an office is precisely commaunded to attend vppon his office euery one that teacheth to attend vppon his teaching euery one that exhorteth to attende vpon his exhortation and that by positiue lawe the selfe same is receiued and commanded to be practized as before in the title of dispensations hath been prooued I see not how he that laboureth to couple the offices of magistracie and ministerye vnto one man and altogeather to seuer an handy craft from a minister can by pretence of lawe or colour of anye reason iustifie his assertion the lawe grounding it selfe vppon the scripture as well for seperating and disioyning the former as for lincking and vniting togeather the latter Yea and the Bishops by their aduertisementes published in the seuenth yeare of hir Graces raigne and subscribed with the handes of one Archbishop and fiue Bishops hir highnesse Ecclesiasticall Commissioners haue ratified and authorized what laye in them the former lawes concerning the practize and vse of the latter Aduertisementes the last article Their wordes are these I shall not openly intermeddle with anye Artificers occupations as couetously to seeke a gayne thereby hauing in Ecclesiasticall liuing to the some of twenty nobles or aboue by yeare Therfore I conclude that an Ecclesiasticall person not hauing aboue twenty nobles by the yeare a small portion for a minister of the Gospell to liue by maye intermeddle with an Artificers occupation And if these great and learned Bishops thinke it a matter tending to couetousnesse for a poore minister to vse openly some handy craft in case he haue twenty nobles or aboue to liue by I thinke for my part whosoeuer shall saye that for a rich Minister openly to intermeddle with an office of ciuill magistracie to winne him credit and to procure him estimation is a matter tending to ambition and vaine glorye that he doth not in so saying slaunder the truth And I haue for the defence of this my opinion the lawes and reasons following 21. q. 3. Cyprianus IAM QVIDEM consilio Episcoporum est statutum ne quis de clericis Dei ministris tutorem curatorem testamento suo nominauerit quandoquidem singuli diuino sacerdotio honorati in clericorum ministerio constituti non nisi altari sacrificiis deseruire precibus orationibus vacare debeant Nemo enim c. It hath beene lately by the councell of Bishops ordayned that no man in his Tectament should nominate any Clearke or minister of God to be a Gardian or ouerseer for that euery one honoured with diuine priesthood and placed in the ministerie of Clearkes ought to attende onely at the Altar and Sacrifices and ought to imploy him selfe to prayers and supplications For no man warfaring to God intangleth himselfe with worldly affayres that he may please him vnto whom he approoueth him selfe Which thing the Bishops and our Predecessours vpon religious consideration and wholesome prouision haue thought good that no man departing out of this life shoulde nominate a Clearke to any wardship or ouersight of any pupils Here againe we see the counsell hauing respecte vnto the custome of former ages and times past applye the very same place of scripture againste the offices mentioned in this Chapiter and vouch it in plea as a barre against those offices in a minister which notwithstanding in their owne natures are necessary and very holy and wherevnto many excellent priuiledges and immunities be attributed the cause of a Testament by lawe beeing placed in the raunge number of holy and Godly causes And we know by experience that the wyser a man is and the more care he hath of his posterities well dooing the more prouident circumspect he is at the time of his decease to leaue the tuitiō of his infantes and disposition of their goods to men best knowne to him to be of greatest pietie sincerest religion such as Bishops haue beene accompted Neither are these offices onlye thus forbydden by Canon lawe the Popes lawe but also by Prouinciall constitutions of Englande made heretofore by the B. themselues in Englande at the commaundement of the Kinges of England
Lyndw. ne clerici vel monac c. vlt. PRESENTI DECRETO c. Wee ordeyne by this present decree that Clearkes beneficed or placed in holy orders bee neyther admitted gouerners of Villadges as to be Stewards or Bayliffes of such administrations by occasion whereof they might be lyable to make accounts vnto laye men neyther yet that they exercise anye secular iurisdiction speciallye those whereunto iudgement of bloode is annexed And from these decrees I conclude thus 1 Whosoeuer ought to attend vppon the alter and to giue him selfe to prayer and making of supplication ought not by anye testament to bee made a Tutor or Gardian 2 But euery one honored with the holy priesthood and placed in the ministery of Clearkes ought to attend vppon the Alter and apply him selfe to prayer making of supplication 3 Therefore none honoured c. and placed c. ought by any testament to bee made a Tutor or Gardian 1 Whosoeuer is gouernour of any Village Steward or Bayliffe of anye liberty or bayliwicke is by vertue of his office accountable to the laytie 2 But no Clearke beneficed or otherwise placed in holy orders by occasion of temporall officers ought to bee accountable to lay men 3 Therefore noe Clearke beneficed or anye other placed in holye orders ought to bee anye Gouernour Steward or Bayliffe THE lyke constitution was made by Octobone sometimes Legate from the Popes side here in Englande and speciallye publyshed againste the excesse of our Englishe Cleargy in this behalfe Constitu Octob. ne clerici iuris secular exerceant CVM HONESTATIS c. Insomuch as it is reputed a speciall decency of ecclesiastical honesty to be farre estranged from carnall actions we deeme it a very heynous and filthy thing that handes deputed vnto heauenly ministeries shoulde be intangled with secular affayres Or that certaine Clearkes seeking after earthly gaines and temporall iurisdiction thorowe a foule and greedy rauine doe receiue from lay men seculer iurisdiction and be called Iusticers and minister iustice which they cannot minister without a dissipation and iniury of ecclesiasticall order Therefore we desirous to extirpate this horrible vice straightly forbid all persons of churches and Vicars with perpetuities yea also all other manner of persons whatsoeuer placed in the ministery that they presume not to take any secular iurisdiction of any secular person or to exercise the same according to the precepts of holy Canons by this present Constitution we straightly inhibite that none placed in spirituall warfare presume to exercise in the secular court the office of an aduocate eyther in the cause of bloud or in any cause whatsouer saue onely in such causes as are permitted vnto him by Law And we likewise forbid that any cleargy man shoulde presume to bee eyther a iudge or an assessor Which constitutiō of Octobone as it seemeth in some sence and in some respect to exempt cleargy men altogether from the power and soueraignty of Kings and princes denying them indeed power ouer the Cleargy and so in this sense be contrary and repugnant to her highnesse Crowne and prerogatiue royall and therefore not authorised by act of Parliament though in the end the same Legate seeme to allowe the Kings priuiledges adding these words Saluis domini Regis priuilegiis Sauing the priuiledge of my Lorde the King So in another respect and in another sence if regard be had to the generall equitye of the inhibition we shall finde the same to agree altogether with the reasons of the former prouisions For in this constitution the Legate allegeth other reasons then before were alleaged and forbiddeth other offices then by the former were forbidden The reasons may be gathered thus 1 Whatsoeuer is iniurious vnto the ministerye or breedeth a dissipation of the ministerye the same may not be lawfully layde vppon the ministery 2 But to be deputed a minister of iustice to be made an aduocate a Iudge or an assessor is iniurious to the ministerye and breedeth a dissipation thereof 3 Therefore these offices may not be deputed vnto them 1 Whatsoeuer may be cause that the cleargy by any foule fault should swarue from the workes of fayth the same may not lawfully be layde vpon the cleargy 2 But to be made a Iustice an aduocate a iudge an assessor in seculer Courts may be cause that the Cleargye shoulde swarue from the workes of faith 3 Therefore Cleargye men lawfully maye not bee made Iustices aduocates Iudges or assessors in seculer courtes WHich two reasons of this prouinciall decree may probablie seeme to haue beene collected out of some more auncient Canons long before that time established wherby the like offices were forbidden and principally for these causes following 21. q 3. peruenit Gloss non exerceant Extra de vit honest cler c. clerici consecratio distinc 5. c. First that for filthy lucres sake they meddle not with taking to hire possessions seculer causes Secondly that thorough slouth idlenesse they separate not themselues from the holy ministeries Thirdly that they runne not a gadding to the Courtes of seculer princes And lastly because the Psalter should neuer be out of their handes And not onely vpon these groundes haue these Lawes at the first had their essence and establishment but sundry other considerations as forceable as these are apparantly known to the learned in the laws for the ouerthrow of ciuill Iurisdiction in ecclesiastical men In the administration of ciuil Iustice euery one in commission of peace without respect eyther of the person or of the cause oughte indifferenly and vnpartially to execute his office For bee a man once sworn in commission of peace he may not afterwards deale with hearing of what causes he list hee may not take notice of halfepeny matters and post ouer matters of bloud to his fellow iustice hee may not onely set an ende betweene neighbour and neighbour for shrewde wordes passed but he must prosecute the murtherer to death he must take his examination and he must send him with a Mittimus to the Iaile He must at the generall Sessions of gayle deliuery certifie the murtherers confession Now because it is a matter very haynous by the ecclesiasticall lawe in force that any ecclesiasticall person shoulde bee present in any place where any sentence is giuen for the sheading of bloud much lesse to bee a minister of Iustice in a cause of bloud Therefore ciuill iurisdiction for this cause also is forbidden ecclesiastical men And among many constitutions I haue thought good to recite onely these that follow Extra ne cleric vel mon. c. clericis CLERICIS IN SACRIS ORDINIBVS c. It is not lawfull by the Councell of Toletane for Clearkes placed in holy orders to handle iudgement of bloude Wherfore we prohibit that they by them selues neyther chop of any members or cause any to be chepped off For if any shall doe such a thing let him be depriued of his honour and of his place And agayne
otherwise then that there hath but little good growen to the Common weale hitherto by the bishops and Cleargie men in the Administration of Ciuill iustice And that therefore such as haue written or spoken or preached againste Ciuill iurisdiction in the Eclesiasticall state haue done it for two vrgent and waightie considerations Friendes of reformation friendes of the queenes maiesties prerogatiue First not to encounter hir maiesties prerogatiue as it is falsely supposed but to teach their Lorde and maisters truth They haue not doone it in disobedience to hir crowne but in obedience to their God They know it is better to obey God then men and therefore they haue laboured faythfully by the worde of God to perswade hir maiestie and the estates of the Realme that these offices ought not by the Lawe of God to be resiaunt in one person and therefore hath exhorted hir maiestie and them in the name and feare of God to vse hir prerogatiue and theire authorities to the seuering of them Secondly they haue preferred the generall welfare and commoditie of the common weale before the vnlawfull honours and promotions of priuate men They know by learning and haue prooued by experience what detriment maye insue to the Common weale when offices are committed to men ignoraunt of such duties as belong vnto their charge A man that hath spent all the dayes of his lyfe in the studie of Grammar or Oratorie and hath alwayes taught the same were a very vnfit man at the age of threeschore yeares to be made a publique Keader in Phisicke or Law and yet notwithstanding to remayne a Schoolemaister still Expedit reipublicae vt quisque officio suo fungatur It is expedient for the Common weale that euery one execute his owne office And I am of opinion that the friendes of reformation are greater friendes and mayntainers to and of hir highnesse prerogatiue then the others be For they ascribe vnto hir maiestie indeede truth and veritie that which the others do but in worde shew and semblaunce onely They earnestly desire and craue that as hir highnesse hath beene annoynted and Crowned by the Lord him selfe Queene and gouernesse ouer them and as she is their naturall and onely lawfull Ladie and Mistresse and as she hath the name title and stile of supreame and chiefe ruler ouer all persons in all causes So likewise the causes now accōpted Ecclesiasticall beeing meere Ciuill shee might in deed truth and veritie haue all and all maner of iurisdiction executed in hir maiesties owne name as well in Courts and iudgements nowe reputed Ecclesiasticall as in other hir maiesties Courtes temporall whereby hir Ciuill gouernement might be more enlarged Which thing the abettours of reformation perceiue now to be otherwyse Forall summons actes proceedinges sentences decrees and iudgementes in all causes and controuersies determinable before Archbishops Bishops and Archdeacons are begunne continued and ended in the Archbishops bishops Archdeacons their Commissaries or Officials names stiles and dignities without any relation or mention of authoritie gyuen unto them as proceeding from hir maiestie then the which there can not seeme anye thing more preiudiciall to hir state Crowne and dignitie For be it that they be created Archbishops and Bishops by hir highnesse and inuested into their seas at hir Graces commaundement yet this argueth no greater prerogatiue belonging vnto hir maiesty ouer them then such as she hath ouer hir other subiectes whom she createth Barons or dubbeth knights But as concerning common and ordinarie iurisdiction in causes reputed Ecclesiasticall they haue no letters patentes from hir maiestie conuaying vnto themas from hir royall person any power ouer hir subiects to heare and determine their causes in hir highnesse name and vnder hir gouernement Onely they execute such iurisdiction as by popishe constitutions or popish customes hath beene heretofore annexed to their Archbishopprickes bishopprickes and Archdeaconries and that by an vtter enemy to hir royall person state and gouernment B. L. to his colleague Comissioners In so much that some of them by Letters hath signified vnto their Colleague Commissioners that common and ordinarie authoritie in causes ecclesiasticall chiefly and almost onely belong to them selues and their officers And that commissions from hir maiestie for reformation in matters ecclesiasticall graunt onely an extraordinarie authoritie And that therefore the sayde Commissioners haue not to heare matters of instance and such as requyre iudgement of lawe for that such causes belong onely to them selues and their officers whereby they haue insinuated hir maiestie to haue no common or ordinarie authoritie in causes ecclesiasticall as they them selues haue Whereas all other courts within hir highnesse Empyre as leetes courtes Baron courtes of regarde courtes of Forrestes I leaue to speake of hir highnesse owne Courtes at Westminster all liberties and franchises all parkes and free warrens belonging to any of the Nobilitie Gentrie or any Citie or borow of this Realme haue euer had their beginninges and establishmentes by the gratious fauour of the Kinges of this Realme as from whose prerogatiue such dignities and immunities ought franckly to proceed and by whom onely they haue beene graunted Onely oure Church gouernours challenge not their authoritie as from hir sacred seate of iustice and princely throone but they challenge their authoritie as a power belonging to their owne seats deriued from an vsurped and forren power 17. pag. ◠28. Henry c. 16. The statute made that euery Archbishop and bishop of this realme and of other the kings dominions may minister vse and exercise all and euery thing and thinges pertayning to the office or order of an Archbishop and bishop with all tokens ensignes and ceremonyes therevnto belonging and that all Archdeacons and Deanes and other hauing offices cures and dignities spiritual may by authoritie of this act and not by vertue of any forren power or authoritie administer vse and exercise all things appertaining to their dignities offices orders cures religions felowships and may lawfully hereafter vse all tokens ensignes and ceremonyes which they haue beene accustomed to vse in times past so it be not expresly against the lawes of God and this Realme This statute I say hauing beene the rule of our Archbishops and bishops consciences for their gracinges there Lordinges there vsheringes their kneelinges there tastinges their cupbearinges and such like improoueth no whit any part of the force of the former assertions but rather confirmeth and fortifieth the same First the statute hauing relation onely to tokens ensignes and ceremonies accustomably administred vsed and exercised before the making of the statute all which beeing Antichristian and therefore expreslye against the lawes of God are plainely by this statute abrogated and therfore ought no more to bee administred vsed or exercised For though the Kinge the peeres and commons at that time not instructed in the vnlawfulnesse of them did not holde and repute them to be againste the lawes of God and therefore did not specially abridge any particuler
and to take awaye all occasion from others to seeke preferment in that house at hir maiesties hands they of late haue inuented a new deuice and practized a new tricke where they were by the order and foundation of the house bound yearely to make elections of such schollers as might presently at the time of the election be placed in the vacant roomes they now either at one time choose a greater number of schollers for them selues then are places vacant and so make but one election in two yeares or else so soone as any place by the departure of any schooler is voyd they foorthwith in the name of the Deane or some Prebendarie chop an other in his roome by meanes whereof either hir maiesties letters are delayed vnto the ende of two yeares or else remayne altogeather frustrated so kinde hearted these no Precisians and these no Puritanes haue beene and so thankfull they haue shewed them selues for their maisterships Deanries and Prebendaries receiued at hir maiesties hands by hir gratious bountie and liberallitie And therefore since they striue so egerly for such tryfles and vse such foule shiftes to shut hir out of doores and make hir schollers packehorses and set them at the Cartes tayle in hir owne Colledges I thinke a man may gesse twice and yet not gesse so nigh as to gesse that Cleargie men enemies to reformation rather then they woulde loose their dignities woulde if it laye in their power gyue hir Highnesse prerogatiue the Canuysadoe They allow hir maiestie a royall power to shred greene Olyue braunches but to roote vp olde rotten dotterelles they deny hir anye such authoritie they can bee contented hir maiestie shoulde strippe poore men cloathed with sackecloath but mighty men decked in scarelet shee may not touch or once looke awrye vppon No cause of the name of ecclesiastical court Concerning the Courtes and iudgement seates of Archbishops bishops and Archdeacons hitherto reputed and called Ecclesiasticall Courtes I can see no reason in the worlde why they shoulde be any more so esteemed taken or reputed or why anye matter or cause or suite or controuersie commenced in those places shoulde or ought to be called or counted Ecclesiasticall For though in times past I meane in time of popery they might probably and coullorably be so called either for that Cleargy men alone were Iudges and exercised iudgement in them either for that such parties as betweene whom suites did depend were for the most part meere church men either for that all peticions and actions made and begunne in those Courtes were for such matters and causes as whereof church men onely by vsurpation challenged vnto them selues the decision and determination yet now so it is that all these reasons fayle and are of no force For with vs at this day though Archbishops bishops and Archdeacons be Cleargie men and chiefe amongest the ecclesiasticall seat yet notwithstanding Doctors of the Ciuill lawe meere laye men as they call them and no whit beneficed by priuiledge of Cleargie exercise all iurisdiction reputed Ecclesiasticall in their consistories and by the ordinaunces of the Realme are made competent and lawfull Iudges in these Courtes 25 Henrici octui Where one suite now dependeth or these manye yeares hath depended in the same Courtes betweene Cleargie men alone one hundreth almost are and hath beene depending betweene laye men alone the causes them selues are all for the moste part mere Ciuill and belong onely to the Ciuill court Approbations and insinuations of Willes and Testamentes by expresse wordes as you haue hearde out of the Ciuill lawe are absolutely prohibited vnto Bishops and all other Cleargie men And so consequently for that Appendices sequuntur principalis subiecti naturam Accessories follow the nature of the principall subiect All causes of Legacies Bequestes Accountes Inuentaries Commissions of Orphanes gooddes and whatsoeuer else may be incident to anye of those causes are vtterly forbydden Causes of wrongfull and iniurious slaunders infamous Libels and contumelious crymes causes of contractes and marriages causes of dowrie and diuorce causes of filiation and legitimation of children matters of Vsurie and whatsoeuer appertayneth to the decision of these causes are causes meere ciuill and pertaine to the ciuill magistrate and therefore sithence Archbish Bish and Archdea to disburthen them selues may lawfullye commit the hearing of these causes from them selues yea and very seldome or not at all execute their iurisdictions by them selues but continually and effectually do surrogate and depute Doctors or Bachelors of the Ciuill lawe What iniurie to their persons or alteration of the state and gouernment can it be in case hir maiestie by hir prerotiue did commit the same causes vnto the same men and make the bishops men hir men and their commissaries hir presidentes Touching matters of tith it is lawfull for the chiefe Iustice of the kings bench where any vsage or custome by any partie is pretended to paye lesse then the whole tith as suppose the twenteth or forteth part of his tithes Yea in some cases where no tith at all is payde as vpon the statute of tith wood beeing timber trees aboue twentie yeares groweth to prohibite in hir maiesties name euery iudge ecclesiasticall that hee proceed not to the determination of any such cause and so to take vnto him selfe the hearing and determination of the same according to the common lawes of hir highnesse realme There is small diuersitie of reason why the same or some other Ciuill magistrate may not as well heare and determyne all and singular causes of tithes after what maner or forme soeuer they be payde as whereby long continuaunce of tyme they haue beene customablye payde after such and such sort or where no payement at all hath beene made In the seconde or thirde instaunce when appeale is made from an Archbishop Bishop or Archdeacon into hir highnesse high Court of Chauncerie or Delegates in any case whatsoeuer hir maiestie by the prerogatiue of hir Crowne and dignitie hath absolute power to appoynt such men to set a finall ende and ordinate direction therein as by their wisedomes shall be thought consonant to equitie right and good conscience There is no disparity of reason why in the first instaunce shee maye not as well haue like authority or why like authority from her or by her Maiesty may not lawfullye bee committed to any of her subiectes though no ecclesiasticall persons but onely seculer and laye men Neyther by this meanes shoulde the course of Lawe touching appeales be taken away but the same might be still practised as now it is In the prouinces belonging to the Romaine Empire though presidents and Proconsulles had their Commissions from the Emperour yet appeales were notwithstanding made from those Gouernours vnto the Consistories and tribunall Seates of the Emperoures imperiall City of resyaunce and cheefe aboade And therefore though the Gouernmentes nowe reputed Ecclesiasticall but in trueth Ciuil were absolutely translated from Ecclesiasticall men and put into the hands