all 2. Important Truths should be strongly Confirmed Such is that here pleaded by the Apostle and therefore doth he so labour in the Confirmation of it He had undertaken to convince the Hebrews of the Cessation of their Legal Worship out of their own acknowledged Principles He deals not with them meerly by his Apostolical Authority and by vertue of the Divine Revelations of the will of God which himself had received but he proceeds with them on Arguments taken out of the Types Institutions and Testimonies of the Old Testament all which they owned and acknowledged though without his aid they had not understood the meaning of them On this Supposition it was necessary for him to Plead and Press all the Arguments from the Topick mentioned which had any Cogency in them and he doth so accordingly 3. Arguments that are equally true may yet on the Account of Evidence not be equally Cogent yet 4. In the Confirmation of the Truth we may use every help that is true and seasonable though some of them may be more effectual unto our End than others This we are instructed in by the Apostle affirming in this place that what he now affirms is yet far more Evident And this Evidence as we observed before may respect either the things themselves or the Efficacy in point of Argument For in themselves all things under the old Testament were Typical and Significant of what was afterwards to be introduced So our Apostle tells us that the Ministry of Moses consisted in giving Testimony to those things which were to be spoken or declared afterwards chap. 3. 5. But among them some were far more Clear and Evident as to their signification than others were In the latter sense the things which he had discoursed about Melchisedec and his Priesthood were more effectually demonstrative of the Change of the Levitical Priesthood than what he had newly observed concerning the Rising of our Lord Jesus Christ not of the Tribe of Levi but of Judah although that had life and evidence also in it self which is principally intended The Argument it self is nextly expressed whereunto this full Evidence is ascribed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 if another Priest do arise after the Similitude of Melchisedec And in the words there is 1 the Modification of the Proposition in the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 The Notation of the Subject spoken of another Priest 3 His Introduction into his Office he did arise 4 The Nature of his Office and the manner of his coming unto it after the likeness of Melchisedec 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 if is generally taken here not to be a Conditional but a Causal Conjunction And so as many judge it is used Rom. 8. 31. 2 Cor. 5. 15. 1 Thess. 3. 8. 1 Pet. 1. 17. And it is rendered in our Translation by For For that another Priest as Beza rendreth it by quod because Others by ex eo quòd and siquidem Syr. and again this is more known by that which he said All take it to be an intimation of a Reason proving what is affirmed and so it doth if with the Vulgar we retain si or siquidem if so be And it is yet far more Evident if so be that another Priest As to the Argument in general we must observe 1 That the Design of the Apostle in this place is not to demonstrate the Dignity and Eminency of the Priesthood of Christ from that of Melchisedec his Type which he had done before sufficiently he doth not produce the same Words and Arguments again unto the same purpose but that which he aims at is from that Testimony whereby he had proved the Dignity of the Priesthood of Christ now also to prove the necessary Abolition of the Levitical Priesthood Wherefore 2 He doth not insist on the whole of the Testimony before pleaded but only on that one thing of another Priest necessarily included therein 2. The Subject spoken of is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is not meerly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 alius as the Syriack understood it who renders it by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 alienus that is intended Every 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was by the Law absolutely forbidden to approach unto the Priests Office or Altar or Sacred employment So 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 another in this Case is a Stranger one that is not of the House or Family of Aaron And nothing can be more evident than that the Levitical Priesthood and the whole Law of Divine Worship must be taken away and abolished then if it appear that any 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Stranger may be admitted into that Office much more if it were necessary that it should so be For the Law of the Priesthood took care of nothing more than that no Stranger that was not of the House of Aaron should be called to that Office See Exod. 29. 33. Lev. 22. 10. Numb 1. 51. and Numb 3. 10. Aaron and his Sons they shall wait on the Preists Office 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Stranger that cometh nigh that is to discharge any Sacerdotal Duty shall be put to death And God gave an eminent Instance of his Severity with respect unto this Law in the Punishment of Corah though of the Tribe of Levi for the Transgression of it And he caused a perpetual Memorial to be kept of that Punishment to the End they might know that no Stranger who is not of the Seed of Aaron should come near to Offer Incense before the Lord Numb 16. 40. And hence our Apostle in the next verse observes that this Priest was not to be made after the Law of a Carnal Commandement seeing his making was a Dissolution of that Law or Commandement If therefore there must be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 another Priest that was not of the linage of Aaron the other is abolished 3. His Introduction into his Office is expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there ariseth Oritur Exoritur Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Surgit Vul. Lat. exurgat Arose in an extraordinary manner Judg. 5. 7. Untill I Deborah arose I arose a Mother in Israel that is by an extraordinary Call from God to be a Prophetess and a Deliverer Deut. 18. 18. A Prophet will I raise up unto you which was Christ himself So God raised up a Horn of Salvation in the house of his Servant David Luk. 1. 69. that is with an extraordinary Power and Glory So was this Priest to arise not springing out of nor succeeding in any order of Priesthood before Established But all things in the Law lay against his Introduction and the Body of the People in the Church was come unto the highest Defiance of any such Priest But as God had fore-signified what he would do when the time of the Reformation of all things should come so when he performed his Word herein he did it in that manner with that
this very Law of Exception doth sufficiently prove the Liberty of all others For the words of it are Every Daughter that possesseth an Inheritance in any Tribe of the Children of Israel shall be Wife unto one of the Family of the Tribe of her Father that the Children of Israel may enjoy every one the Inheritance of their Father Numb 36. 8. Both the express limitation of the Law unto those who possessed Inheritances and the Reason of it for the preservation of the Lots of each Tribe entire as ver 3 4. manifest that all other were at liberty to Marry any Israelite be he of what Tribe soever And thus both the Genealogies of Matthew and Luke one by a Legal the other by a Natural line were both of them from the Tribe of Judah and Family of David So It pleaseth God to give sufficient Evidence unto the accomplishment of his Promise 2. For the manner of the proceeding of the Lord Christ from that Tribe the Apostle expresseth it by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He sprang 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is usually taken in an active sence to cause to rise Mat. 5. 45. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he causeth his Sun to rise And sometimes it is used Neutrally for to rise and so as some think it peculiarly denotes the rising of the Sun in distinction from the other Planets Hence is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the East from the rising of the Sun So the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ is called the rising of the Sun of Righteousness with healing in his wings Mal. 4. 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Luke 1. 78. The day-spring from on high Thus did the Lord Christ arise in the light and glory of the Sun a light to lighten the Gentiles and the Glory of his People Israel But the word is used also to express other springings as of Water from a Fountain or a Branch from the Stock And so it is said of our Lord Jesus that he should grow up as a tender Plant and as a Root out of a dry Ground Isa. 53. 2. A Rod out of the Stem and a Branch out of the Roots of Jesse Chap. 11. 1. Hence he is frequently called the Branch and the Branch of the Lord Isa. 4. 2. Jer. 23. 5. Chap. 33. 15. Zech. 3. 8. Chap 6. 12. But the first which is the most proper sense of the words is to be regarded he arose eminently and illustriously from the Tribe of Judah Having laid down this Matter of Fact as that which was evident and on all hands confessed he observes upon it that of that Tribe Moses spake nothing concerning the Priesthood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with reference unto which Tribe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 de qua Tribu Being to prove that the Priesthood did no way belong to the Tribe of Judah So that the Introduction of a Priest of that Tribe must necessarily exclude those of the House of Aaron from that Office he appeals unto the Law-giver or rather the Law it self For by Moses not the Person of Moses absolutely is intended as though these things depended on his Authority but it is his Ministry in giving of the Law or his Person only as Ministerially employed in the Declaration of it that our Apostle respects And it is the Law of Worship that is under consideration Moses did record the Blessing of Judah as given him by Jacob wherein the Promise was made unto him that the Shilo should come from him Gen. 49. 10. And this same Shilo was also to be a Priest But this was a Promise before the Law and not to be accomplished until the expiration of the Law and belonged not unto any Institution of the Law given by Moses Wherefore Moses as the Law-giver when the Office of the Priesthood was Instituted in the Church and confirmed by especial Law or Ordinance spake nothing of it with respect unto the Tribe of Judah For as in the Law the first Institution of it was directly confined unto the Tribe of Levi and House of Aaron so there is not in all the Law of Moses the least intimation that on any Occasion in any future Generations it should be translated unto that Tribe Nor was it possible without the alteration and abolition of the whole Law that any one of that Tribe should once be put into the Office of the Priesthood The whole worship of God was to cease rather than that any one of the Tribe of Judah should Officiate in the Office of the Priesthood And this silence of Moses in this matter the Apostle takes to be a sufficient Argument to prove that the legal Priesthood did not belong nor could be transferred unto the Tribe of Judah And the Grounds hereof are resolved into this general Maxime that whatever is not revealed and appointed in the Worship of God by God himself is to be considered as nothing yea as that which is to be rejected And such he conceived to be the Evidence of this Maxime that he chose rather to Argue from the silence of Moses in general than from the particular Prohibition that none who was not of the Posterity of Aaron should approach unto the Priestly Office So God himself condemneth some Instances of false VVorship on this Ground that he never appointed them that they never came into his Heart and thence aggravates the sin of the People rather than from the particular Prohibition of them Jer. 7. 31. VVherefore Divine Revelation gives Bounds positively and negatively unto the Worship of God VER 15 16 17. THat the Aaronical Priesthood was to be Changed and consequently the whole Law of Ordinances that depended thereon and that the Time wherein this Change was to be made was now come is that which is designed unto Confirmation in all this Discourse And it is that Truth whereinto our Faith of the Acceptance of Evangelical Worship is resolved For without the removal of the Old there is no place for the New This therefore the Apostle now fully confirmes by a Recapitulation of the force and sum of his preceding Arguments 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And it is yet far more evident for that after the Similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another Priest who is made not after the Law of a carnal Commandement but after the power of an Endless Life For he Testifieth thou art a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchisedec There are four things to be considered in these words 1. The manner of the Introduction of this new Argument declaring its especial force with the weight that the Apostle lays upon it And it is yet far more Evident 2. The Medium or Argument it self which he insists upon which is that from what he had already proved there was another Priest to arise after the Similitude of Melchisedec 3. The Illustration of this Argument in an Explication of the wayes and means whereby this Priest arose declared both negatively and positively Who is made not after the Law
A Continuation OF THE EXPOSITION OF THE EPISTLE OF Paul the Apostle TO THE HEBREWS Viz. ON THE Sixth Seventh Eighth Ninth and Tenth Chapters WHEREIN Together with the Explication of the Text and Context The Priesthood of Christ as Typed by those of Melchisedek and Aaron with an Account of their distinct Offices The Nature and Efficacy of the Sacrifice of Christ as Typed by all the Sacrifices of the Law The Erection of the Tabernacle according to the Heavenly Pattern with the Institution of all its Utensils and Services their especial Signification and End The Nature and Differences of the Two Covenants the Old and the New with the preference of the latter above the former The Reasons and Necessity of the taking away and Abolishing of the Old Legal Worship annexed unto the Covenant of Sinai the Means whereby it was removed The Glorious Administration of the Mediatory Office of Christ in Heaven and sundry other Evangelical Truths of the highest Importance WITH The Duty of Believers in hearing the Word in Times of Trial and Persecution the Means and danger of Apostacy from the Profession of the Gospel Are Declared Explained and Confirmed As also The Pleas of the Jews for the Continuance and Perpetuity of their Legal Worship with the Doctrine of the principal Writers of the Socinians about these things are Examined and Disproved By J. Owen D. D. John 5. 39. Search the Scriptures LONDON Printed for Nathaniel Ponder at the Sign of the Peacock in the Poultry near the Church 1680. THE PREFACE TO THE READER I have so fully in my former Discourses on this subject declared the general design scope and end of this Epistle the proper way and means of its Interpretation with the method of the present Exposition which is the same throughout that I shall not at all here detain the Reader with a renewed Declaration of any of them Onely some few things which immediately concern that part of the Exposition which is now presented unto him and my labour therein may be mentioned as I suppose unto some usefulness 1. And it may not be amiss in the first place to take notice of an Objection the present endeavour seems liable and obnoxious unto and this is the Unseasonableness of it We live in times that are fortifyed against the use of Discourses of this nature especially such as are so long and bulky The world and the minds of men therein are filled with disorder and confusion and the most are at their wits end with looking after the things that are come and coming on the Earth They have enough to do in hearing telling and reading real or pretended News of publick affairs so as to divert them from ingaging their time and industry in the perusal and study of such discourses Besides there is not any thing in this now published to condite it unto the Palate of the present Age in personal contests and reflections in pleading for or against any party of men or especial way in the profession of Religion only the fundamental Truths of the Gospel are occasionally contended for These and the like considerations might possibly in the judgment of some have shut up this whole discourse in darkness upon the account of its being unseasonable I shall briefly acquaint the Reader with what Relieved me against this objection and gave me satisfaction in the publishing of this part of the Exposition after it was finished For I could not but remember that the times and seasons where in the former parts of it were published were very little more setled and quiet than are these which are now urgent on us yet did not this hinder but they have been of some use and benefit unto the Church of God in this Nation and others also And who knows but this may have the same blessing accompanying of it He who hath supplyed seed to the sower can multiply the seed sown and encrease the Fruits of it And although at present the most are really unconcerned in things of this nature yet not a few from many parts both at home and abroad have earnestly solicited the continuation of the Exposition at least unto that period whereunto it is arrived Besides in labours and endeavours of this nature respect is not had meerly unto the present Generation especially as many are filled with prejudices and causeless enmity against the Author of them We have our selves more benefit and advantage by the writings of sundry persons in former Ages than they received by them who lived in their own days Pascitur in Vivis Livor post Fata quiescit It is therefore the Duty of some in every Age to commit over unto those that shall survive in the Church of God and profession of the Truth their Knowledge in the Mysteries of the Gospel whereby spiritual light may be more and more encreased unto the perfect day On these and the like Considerations I have wholly left these times and seasons in his hand who hath the sole disposal of them and will not so far observe the present blustering Wind and Clouds as not to sow this seed or despair of reaping Fruits thereby 2. The Reader will find no Exercitations prefixed unto this Volume as there are unto the former And this is so fallen out not because there were no things of weight or moment occurring in these Chapters deserving a separate peculiar handling and consideration But for other reasons which made the omission of them necessary and unavoidable For indeed continued informities and weaknesses in my near Approach unto the Grave rendred me insufficient for that labour especially considering what other duties have been and yet are incumbent on me And yet also my Choice was compliant with this Necessity For I found that this part of the Exposition comprizing so many Chapters and those all of them filled with glorious Mysteries and things of the highest importance unto our Faith and Obedience would arise unto a greatness disproportinate unto the former had it been accompanied with the like Exercitations Whereas therefore I foresaw from the beginning that they must be omitted I did treat somewhat more fully of those things which should have been the subject of them than otherwise the nature of an exposition doth require Such are the Person and Office of Melchisedek The nature of the Aaronical Priesthood and of the Priesthood of Christ as typed thereby The framing of the Tabernacle with all its Vessels and Utensils with their use and signification The solemnity of the Covenant made at Sinai with the difference between the two Covenants the Old and the New The manner of the Service of the High Priest on the Day of Expiation with his entrance into the most Holy place The cessation expiration or abrogation of the first Covenant with all the services thereunto belonging with sundry other things of the like importance Whereas therefore these must have been the subject of such Exercitations as might have been prefixed unto this part of the
but Salem was On the other side it is pleaded with more probability that Hicrusalem was the Seat of his Kingdom For 1. It was Anciently called Salem which Name is afterwards occasionally applyed unto it as that whereby it was known Psal. 76. 2. In Salem is Gods Tabernacle and his dwelling-place in Sion where Hierusalem only can be intended Afterwards some think that when it was possessed by the Jebusites it began at first to be called Jebus-Salem that is Salem of the Jebusites which by Custom was transformed into Hierusalem But the approved Etymology from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so that the Name should signifie a Sight or Vision of Peace is certainly true and probably given by God himself 2. In the days of Joshua the King of Hierusalem was called Adonizedec a Name of the same signification with Melchisedec which possibly from him was the Name of the Kings who afterwards Reigned in that City And that man as it should seem was in some Reputation for Righteousness among the Canaanites whence he managed their common Cause in their Danger Josh. 10. 1 2 3 4. 3. Abraham dwelt at this time at Hebron in the Plain of Mamre and in his Return from Hoba or Damascus the way lay near unto Hierusalem as all Charts yet declare and Sychem was more to the North than that he should conveniently pass that way 4. Hierusalem being designed to be the place where the Lord Christ was to begin and exercise his Priestly Office it may well be supposed that there this his Illustrious Type was to appear and be manifested especially considering that it was to be the place where the Seat of the Church was to be fixed untill the signification of the Type was to be effected And these Reasons do prevail with me to judge that Hierusalem was the place of the Habitation and Reign of Melchisedec As for what is affirmed by Hierome concerning the Ruines of his Palace at Sychem it is notoriously known how little Credit such Traditions do deserve Besides Josephus who lived 400 Years before him makes no mention of any such thing And it is probable that the Ruines which Hierome saw were those of the Palace of Jeroboam who there fixed the Seat of the Kingdom of Israel 1 Kings 12. 25. as King of the place where he obtained the Crown ver 1. But Credulous and Superstitious Posterity chose to ascribe it unto the Memorial of Melchisedec rather than of him who being the Bane and Ruine of the Nation his Memory was accursed And to enquire how this City came afterwards into the hands of the Jebusites is directly contrary to the Design of the Holy Ghost which was to hide from us the end of his Life and Offices as our Apostle declares And herein also Possession was taken of the Seat of the Church in the Tents of Shem on the behalf and in the Name of the Japetian Gentiles And may we not observe that God in his Sovereign Pleasure gives various Intervals unto places as to the enjoyment of his Worship and Ordinances This Hierusalem which was at first enobled by the Priesthood of Melchisedec was afterwards left for a long Season unto the Idolatrous Jebusites In process of time it was visited again and made the fixed station of all Solemn Divine Worship as it is now left unto Salt and Barrenness So hath he dealt with many other places and in particular notwithstanding their boasting with the City of Rome sometimes a Seat of the Gospel now the Throne of Antichrist Go to my place which was in Shilo Jer. 7. 12 14. 26. 6. By the way we must here give an Account of somewhat that the Apostle doth not say as well as what he doth After the mention of Melchisedec and his being King of Salem in the Story Gen. 14. it is added That he met Abraham and brought forth Bread and Wine ver 17. 18. Of his meeting Abraham the Apostle takes Notice but of his bringing forth Bread and Wine not at all Hereof undoubtedly no Reason can be given but only that That particular Action or Passage belonged not at all unto his Purpose For he who takes Notice of all other Circumstances Arguing as well from what was not said of him as from what was would not have omitted any thing which is so expressely affirmed as this is had it any way belonged unto his Purpose But the importunity of the Papists who with a strange kind of Considence do hence seek Countenance unto their Missatical Sacrifice makes it necessary that we should enquire a little farther into it Melchisedec they tell us as a Priest and Type of Christ did offer this Bread and Wine in Sacrifice to God Herein they add alone was he Typical of Christ who offered himself unto God under the Appearance of Bread and Wine And he also Instituted the Sacrifice of the Mass wherein he should be so Offered continually unto the end of the World And on that Account alone they say he continueth a Priest for ever For if he had not appointed Priests here in his room to Offer him unto God that Office of his would have ceased as Bellarmine disputes at large It were easie to make naked the fondness of these Imaginations would our present Design permit Some few things may be Remarked on their Assertions As 1. The Apostle in this whole Discourse wherein Melchisedec is introduced and concerned treateth not at all of the Sacrifice of Christ nor intimates any Resemblance between the Offering of Melchisedec and that of Christ but it is the Office alone and its Dignity which he insists upon designing to treat afterwards at large about his Sacrifice And when he doth so he doth not in the least compare it with the Sacrifice of Melchisedec but with those of Aaron according to the Law so that here was no occasion for him to mention any Sacrifice of Melchisedec's should any such thing be supposed in the Text of Moses 2. A Supposition of such a Sacrifice of Bread and Wine as that pleaded for is contrary to the Apostles Design and destructive of it For whereas he endeavoureth to prove that the Priesthood of Melchisedec was far more Excellent than that of Levi he could not do it by this that he Offered Bread and Wine in Sacrifice for so also did the Levitical Priests Lev. 7. 13. 23. 13 18. But all the Excellencies which the Apostle insisteth on consists in the Dignity of his Office and the Qualifications of his Person not in the matter of his Sacrifice 3. Let all be granted they can desire yet are they not advantaged as unto their especial end thereby For what is the Offering of real Bread and Wine and no more unto the Offering of the Body and Soul of Jesus Christ under the appearance of them 4. As unto what they contend That the Lord Jesus Christ would not be a Priest for ever unless he had those Priests on Earth who continue to Offer him
are things still of this Nature both as unto whole Churches and as unto particular Persons Some Churches are like Capernaum as to the outward means of Grace as it were lifted up to Heaven Let them take heed of Capernaum's Judgment in being brought down as low as Hell for their Abuse of them or Negligence in their Improvement Some Persons have Eminent Endowments and if they are not Eminent in Service they will prove their disadvantage Yea the Highest Priviledges should make Men ready to condescend unto the meanest Duties This is that which our Lord Jesus Christ so signally Instructed his Disciples in when he himself washed their Feet and taught them the same Duty towards the meanest of his Disciples John 13. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17. 3. Opportunities for Duty which render it beautiful ought diligently to be embraced So did Abraham as unto this Duty upon his meeting of Melchisedec Hence the Performance of this Duty became so Renowned and was of the Use whereunto it is here applyed by our Apostle It is Season that gives every thing its Beauty And Omission of Seasons or Tergiversations under them are Evidences of an Heart much under the power of Corrupt Lusts or Unbelief 4. When the Instituted Use of Consecrated things ceaseth the things themselves cease to be Sacred or of Esteem For what became of all these Dedicated things after the death of Melchisedec They were no more Sacred the Actual Administration of his Typical Priesthood ceasing Of what Use was the Brazen Serpent after it was taken from the Pole whereon it was lifted up by Gods appointment or of what Use would the lifting of it up be when it was not under an express Command We know it proved a Snare a means of Idolatry and that was all Gods Institution is the Foundation and VVarranty of all Consecration All the Men in the world cannot really Consecrate or Dedicate any thing but by virtue of Divine Appointment And this Appointment of God respected always a limited Use beyond which nothing was Sacred And every thing kept beyond its Appointment is like Manna so kept it breeds VVorms and stinketh These things are manifest from the consideration of all things that God ever accepted or dedicated in the Church But Ignorance of them is that which hath filled the world with horrid Superstition How many things have we had made Sacred which never had warranty from any Institution of God Monasteries Abbies Persons and Lands Altars Bells Utensils with other things of the like Nature very many which whatever Use they are of yet all the Men in the world cannot make them Sacred And the extending of the Sacredness of Dedicated things beyond their Use hath had no less pernitious Event Hence was the Useless Reservation of the Consecrated Bread after the Sacrament and afterwards the Idolatrous VVorship of it But these things are here occasionally only mentioned The Apostle adds in the Confirmation of his Argument VER 5. And verily they that are the Sons of Levi who receive the Office of the Priesthood have a Commandment to take Tithes of the People according to the Law that is of their Brethren though they come out of the Loins of Abraham There is in these words an Illustration and Confirmation of the present Argument proving the Preference of Melchisedec above Abraham from his giving the Tithe or Tenth of all unto him and consequently receiving the Blessing from him And this is taken from what was determined in the Law and acknowledged among the Hebrews with which kind of Arguments the Apostle doth principally press them in the whole Epistle as we have shewed on many Occasions Now this is that the Priests who received Tithes by the Law were Superiour in Dignity and Honour unto the People from whom they did receive them And this was only declared in the Law for the Foundation of it was in the Light of Nature as the Apostle expressely intimates in the Instance of Benediction afterwards There are considerable in the words 1. The Introduction of this new confirmation of his fore-going Argument 2. A Description of the Persons in whom he Instanceth 3. The Action ascribed unto them with its Limitation And 4. The Qualification of the Persons to whom their Power was exercised The Introduction of his Reasoning herein is in these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Connexion in the Conjunction is plain yet not a Reason is given of what was spoken before but a Continuation of the same Argument with farther Proof is intended And he adds the Note of Observation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 verily as if he had said as to this matter of Tithing and what may thence justly be inferred as to Dignity and Preeminence you may consider how it was under the Law and there what I propose unto you you will find directly Confirmed It is a great advantage to press them with whom we have to do from their own Principles The Description of the Persons in whom he Instanceth is in those words The Sons of Levi who receive the Office of the Priesthood It was the Priests directly whom he intended or the Sons of Aaron and he might have so expressed it the Priests according to the Law But he varieth his expression for sundry Reasons that appear in the Context 1. Because all the Levites did receive Tithes by the Law yea Tithes in the first place was paid unto them in common But because their Dignity among the People was less conspicuous than that of the Priests and the design of the Apostle is not meerly to argue from the giving of Tithes unto any but the giving of them unto them as Priests as Abraham gave Tithes of all to Melchisedec as Priest of the High God he thus expresseth it The Sons of Levi who receive the Office of the Priesthood For though all the Sons of Levi received Tithes yet all of them did not receive the Priesthood with which sort of Persons alone he was concerned 2. He doth thus express it to introduce the mention of Levi whom he was afterwards to mention on the same Occasion and to lay the weight of him and the whole Tribe under the same Argument 3. He minds them by the way of another Dignity of the Priesthood in that not all the Posterity of Abraham no nor yet of Levi were partakers thereof but it was a Priviledge granted only to one part of them even the Family of Aaron And these are the Persons in whom he makes his Instance Thus God distributes Dignity and Preeminence in the Church as he pleaseth Not all the posterity of Abraham but only those of Levi were set apart to receive Tithes and not all the posterity of Levi but only the Family of Aaron did receive the Priesthood And this Order of his Soveraign pleasure God required of them all to submit unto and acquiesce in Numb 16. 9 10. And it is a dangerous thing out of Envy pride or Emulation to transgress the Bounds of
that Interpreter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quid adhuc quid amplius opus erat esset necessarium fuit What need was there yet or moreover Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 wherefore ad quid to what purpose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 oriri Beza Exoriri Surgere vul Lat. Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 should arise Oriri properly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in or after the likeness of Melchisedec Secundum ordinem 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Et non secundum ordinem Aaron dici Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is rendred in the Translation in the Polyglot Sed dixit but he said it shall be or he shall be in the likeness of Aaron Dixisset antem which regulated by the precedent Interrogation gives us the true sence of the place Suppose there must another Priest arise yet if Perfection had been by the Levitical Priesthood he would have said that he should be of the Order of Aaron VER 11. If therefore Perfection were by the Levitical Priesthood for under it the People Received the Law what farther need was there that another Priest should rise after the Order of Melchisedec and not be called after the Order of Aaron The first thing in the words is the Introduction of the ensuing Discourse and Argument in those particles of Inference 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 if therefore If things be as we have declared He had a peculiar Scope and Design in all those things These he is now introducing The Improvement of his whole preceding Discourse and the whole Mystery of the Priesthood of Melchisedec he will now make an Application of unto the great cause he had in hand He hath proved by all sorts of Arguments that the Priesthood of Melchisedec was Superiour unto that of Aaron Before he had evinced that there was to be another Priest after his Order and this Priest must of necessity be greater than all those who went before him of the Tribe of Levi in as much as he was so by whom he was represented before the Institution of that Priesthood Now he will let the Hebrews know whither all these things do tend in particular and what doth necessarily follow from and depend upon them This he lays the Foundation of in this Verse and declares in those following And that they might consider how what he had to say was educed from what he had before proved he introduceth it with these Notes of Inference 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 if therefore And to comprehend the meaning of these words in general with the Design of the Apostle in them we may observe 1. That his Reasoning in this case is built upon a Supposition which the Hebrews could not deny And this is that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Perfection or Consummation is the end aimed at in the Priesthood of the Church That Priesthood which perfects or consummates the People in order unto their acceptance with God and future enjoyment of him their present Righteousness and future Blessedness is that which the Church stands in need of and cannot rest till it comes unto That Priesthood which doth not do so but leaves Men in an imperfect unconsummate estate whatever Use it may be of for a season yet cannot it be perpetual unto the exclusion of another For if so either God had not designed to consummate his people or he must do it some other way and not by a Priesthood The first is contrary to the Truth and Faithfulness of God in all his Promises yea would make all Religion vain and ludicrous For if it will never make Men perfect to what end doth it serve or what must do so in the room thereof That this should be done any other way than by a Priesthood the Hebrews did neither expect nor believe For they knew full well that all the ways appointed by the Law to make attonement for sin to attain Righteousness and Acceptance with God depended on the Priesthood and the Services of it in Sacrifices and other parts of Divine Worship If therefore the Apostle proves that Perfection could not be attained by nor under the Levitical Priesthood it necessarily follows that there must be some more Excellent Priesthood remaining as yet to be introduced This therefore he undeniably evinceth by this consideration For 2. Look unto the Levitical Priesthood in the days of David and Solomon Then was that Order in its height and at its best then was the Tabernacle first and afterwards the Temple in their greatest Glory and the Worship of God performed with the greatest Solemnity The Hebrews would grant that the Priesthood of Levi could never arise to a higher pitch of Glory nor be more Useful than it was in those days Yet saith he it did not then consummate the Church Perfection was not then attainable by it This the Jews might deny and Plead that they desired no more Perfection than what was in those days attained unto Wherefore our Apostle proves the contrary namely that God designed a Perfection or Consummation for his Church by a Priesthood that was not then attained This he doth by the Testimony of David himself who Prophesied and fore-told that there was to be another Priest after the Order of Melchisedec For if the Perfection of the Church was all that God ever aimed at by a Priesthood if that were attained or attainable by the Priesthood in David's time to what End should another be promised to be raised up of another Order To have done so would not have been consistent with the Wisdom of God nor the Immutability of his Counsel For unto what purpose should a new Priest of another Order be raised up to do that which was done before Wherefore 3. The Apostle obviates an Objection that might be raised against the sence of the Testimony produced by him and his Application of it For it might be said that after the Institution of the Levitical Priesthood there was yet mention of another Priest to rise it might be some Eminent Person of the same Order such a one as Joshua the Son of Josedec after the Captivity who was eminently Serviceable in the House of God and had eminent Dignity thereon Zech. 3. 4 5 6 7. So that the defect supposed might be in the Persons of the Priests and not in the Order of the Priesthood This the Apostle obviates by declaring that if it had been so he would have been called or spoken of as one of the Order of Aaron But whereas there were two Orders of the Priesthood the Melchisedecian and Aaronical it is expressely said that this other Priest should be of the former and not of the latter 4. He hath yet a farther Design which is not only to prove the Necessity of another Priest and Priesthood but thereon also a Change and an Abrogation of the whole Law of Worship under the Old Testament Hence he here introduceth the mention of the Law as that which was given at the same time with
the Priesthood and had such a Relation thereunto as that of Necessity it must stand and fall with it And this may suffice for a view of the Scope of this Verse and the force of the Argument contained in it We shall now consider the particulars of it 1. A Supposition is included that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we render Perfection is the adaequate and compleat end of the Office of the Priesthood in the Church This at one time or another in one Order or another it must attain or the whole Office is Useless And the Apostle denies that this could be obtained by the Levitical Priesthood And he calls the Priesthood of the Law Levitical not only because Levi was their Progenitor the Patriarch of their Tribe from whom they were Genealogized but also because he would comprise in his Assertion not only the House of Aaron unto whom the Right and Exercise of the Priesthood was limited and confined but he would also take into Consideration the whole Levitical Service which was subservient unto the Office of the Priesthood and without which it could not be discharged Wherefore the Levitical Priesthood is that Priesthood in the Family of Aaron which was assisted in all their Sacerdotal Actings and Duties by the Levites who were Consecrated of God unto that End That 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Perfection was of this Priesthood is denyed in a restrictive Interrogation If it had been so it would have been otherwise with respect unto another Priest than as it is declared by the Holy Ghost 2. Our principal Enquiry on this Verse will be what this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is and wherein it doth consist The word is rendred Perfectio Consummatio Consecratio Sanctificatio Dedicatio The Original Signification and Use of the word hath been spoken unto on Chap. 2. ver 10. where it is rendred Sanctification real and internal Sanctification is not intended but that which is the same with Sacred Dedication or Consecration For it is plainly distinguished from real Inherent Sanctification by our Apostle Chap. 10. 14. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 By one Offering he hath perfected them that are Sanctified This 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Effect and Product of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is wrought towards them who are Sanctified and so doth not consist in their Sanctification Much less therefore doth it signifie an absolute Perfection of Inherent Holiness Some Men no sooner hear the Name of Perfection in the Scripture but they presently dream of an absolute sinless Inherent Perfection of Holiness which if they are not utterly blinded and hardned they cannot but know themselves far enough distant from But this word hath no such signification But if it denotes not internal Holiness at all it doth not do so the Perfection of it Nor is any such Perfection attainable in this Life as the Scripture every where testifies Wherefore the Apostle had no need to prove that it was not attainable by the Levitical Priesthood nor to reflect upon it for that reason seeing it is not attainable by any other way or means whatever We must therefore diligently enquire into the true Notion of this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Perfection which will guide the remaining Interpretation of the words And concerning it we may observe in general First That it is the Effect or End or Necessary consequent of a Priesthood This Supposition is the Foundation of the whole Argument of the Apostle Now the Office and Work may be considered two ways 1. With respect unto God who is the first immediate Object of all the proper Acts of that Office 2. With respect unto the Church which is the Subject of all the Fruits and Benefits of its Administration If we take it in the first way then the Expiation of Sin is intended in this word For this was the great Act and Duty of the Priesthood towards God namely to make Expiation of Sin or Attonement for it by Sacrifice And if we take the word in this sence the Apostle's Assertion is most true For this Perfection was never attainable by the Levitical Priesthood It could Expiate sin and make Attonement only Typically and by way of Representation really and effectually as to all the Ends of Spiritual Reconciliation unto God and the Pardon of sin they could not do it For it was not possible as our Apostle observes that the Blood of Bulls and Goats should take away sins Chap. 10. 4. which he also proves in his ensuing Discourse at large But I do not know that this word is any where used in this sence nor doth it include any such signification And whereas God is the immediate Object of that Sacerdotal Energy whereby sin is Expiated it is the Church that is here said to be Perfected so that Expiation of sin cannot be intended thereby though it be supposed therein Besides the Apostle doth not here understand Sacrifices onely by which alone attonement was made but all other Administrations of the Levitical Priesthood whatever The Socinians would have Expiation of Sin here intended and I shall therefore examine briefly what they speak to this purpose in their Comment on this place Perfectionis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nomine hoc loco nihil aliud intelligit Autor quà m veram perfectam Expiationem peccatorum qua non tantum quorundam sed omnium etiam gravissimorum criminum reatus isque non tantum poenae alicujus temporariae ad hanc vitam spectantis sed ipsius aeternae mortis aufertur jusque homini vitae sempiternae conceditur qua denique non tantum reatus omnis omnium peccatorum sed ipsa peccata in hominibus tolluntur Namque his in rebus vera hominum perfectio coram deo consistit Si ergo haec perfectio hominibus contingere potuisset per Sacerdotium Leviticum certè nullus fuisset usus novi Sacerdotis Melchisedeciani Sacerdotium enim propter peccatorum expiationem constituitur At si perfecta peccatorum Expiatio contingebat per Aaronicum Sacerdotium quid opus erat novum istum superinducere Sacerdotem secundum ordinem Melchisedeci ut scilicet perageret id quod peragere potuerat Aaronicus Quocirca cùm Deus illum constituere voluerit atque adeò jam constituerit hinc patet uemini per Leviticum Sacerdotium perfectionem seu perfectam expiationem contigisse ut certe non contigit Quorundum enim peccatorum expiatio per illud fiebat nempe Ignorantiarum Infirmitatum gravium autem peccatorum scelerum poena mortis luenda erat Nec ista expiatio ad tollendam aeternam mortem quidquam virium habuit sed tantum ad tollendas quasdam poenas temporarias huic vitae proprias Nec denique illis Sacrificiis ulla vis inerat homines ab ipsis peccatis retrahendi 1. What in general is suited unto the Apostle's Argument whatever be the sence of the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here mentioned is approved The Question is
inconveniency in this Interpretation yet I look not on it as suited unto the Design of the Apostle in this place For his intention is to prove that Perfection was not to be obtained by the Levitical Priesthood Unto this end he was to consider that Priesthood under all its Advantages for if any of them seem to be omitted it would weaken his Argument seeing what it could not do under one consideration it might do under another Now although it was some commendation of the Levitical Priesthood that it was appointed of God or confirmed by a Law yet was it a far greater Advancement that therewith the whole Law was given and thereon did depend as our Apostle declares in the next Verses The Introduction of this clause by the Particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may be on a double Account which though different yet either of them is consistent with this Interpretation of the words 1. It may be used in a way of Concession of all the Advantages that the Levitical Priesthood was accompanied withal be it that together with that Priesthood the People also received the Law Or 2. On the other side there is included a Reason why Perfection was not to be attained by that Priesthood namely because together with it the People were brought into Bondage under the Yoke of the Law Either way the whole Law is intended But the most probable Reason of the Introduction of this Clause by that Particle for was to bring in the whole Law into the same Argument that Perfection was not attainable by it This the Apostle plainly reassumes ver 18 19 concluding as of the Priesthood here that it made nothing Perfect For it is the same Law which made nothing perfect that was given together with that Priesthood and not that especial Command alone whereby it was instituted There yet remains one Difficulty in the words For the People are said to receive the Law under the Levitical Priesthood and therefore it should seem that that Priesthood was established before the giving of the Law But it is certain that the Law was given on Mount Sinai before the Institution of that Priesthood For Aaron was not called nor separated unto his Office untill after Moses came down from the Mount the second time with the Tables renewed after he had broken them Exod. 40. 12 13 14. Two things may be applyed to the removal of this Difficulty For 1. The People may be said to receive the Law under the Levitical Priesthood not with respect unto the Order of the giving of the Law but as unto their Actual Obedience unto it in the exercise of the things required in it And so nothing that appertained unto Divine Worship according unto the Law was performed by them until that Priesthood was established And this as I have shewed is the true Signification of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here used It doth not signifie the giving of the Law unto them but their being legalized or brought under the Power of it Wherefore although some part of the Law was given before the institution of that Priesthood yet the People were not brought into the Actual Obedience of it but by virtue thereof But 2. The Apostle in this place hath especial respect unto the Law as it was the Cause and Rule of Religious Worship of Sacrifices Ceremonies and other Ordinances of Divine Service For in that part of the Law the Hebrews placed all their Hopes of Perfection which the Moral Law could not give them And in this respect the Priesthood was given before the law For although the Moral law was given in the Audience of the People before on the Mount and an Explication was given of it unto Moses as it was to be applyed unto the Government of that People in Judiciary proceedings commonly called the Judicial law before he came down from the Mount Exod. 21. 22 23. yet as to the system of all Religious Ceremonies Ordinances of Worship Sacrifices of all sorts and Typical Institutions whatever belonged unto the Sacred Services of the Church the law of it was not given out unto them until after the Erection of the Tabernacle and the separation of Aaron and his Sons unto the Office of the Priesthood Yea that whole Law was given by the voyce of God out of that Tabernacle whereof Aaron was the Minister Lev. 1. 1 2. So that the People in the largest sence may be said to receive the law under that Priesthood Wherefore the sence of the words is that together with the Priesthood the People received the Law of Commandments contained in Ordinances which yet effected not in their Conjunction the End that God designed in his Worship And we may observe that Obs. Put all Advantages and Priviledges whatever together and they will bring nothing to Perfection without Jesus Christ. God manifested this in all his Revelations and Institutions His Revelations from the Foundation of the world were gradual and partial increasing the light of the knowledge of his Glory from Age to Age. But put them all together from the first Promise with all Expositions of it and Additions unto it with Prophesies of what should afterwards come to pass taking in also the Ministry of John the Baptist yet did they not all of them together make a perfect Revelation of God his Mind and Will as he will be known and worshipped Heb. 1. 1. John 1. 18. So also was there great variety in his Institutions Some were of great Efficacy and of clearer Significancy than others But all of them put together made nothing perfect Much more will all the ways that others shall find out to attain Righteousness Peace Light and life before God come short of Rest or Perfection The last thing considerable in these words is the Reason whereby the Apostle proves That in the Judgment of the Holy Ghost himself Perfection was not attainable by the Levitical Priesthood For if it were what farther need was there that another Priest should arise after the Order of Melchisedec and not be called after the Order of Aaron The Reason in these words is plain and obvious For after the Institution of that Priesthood and after the Execution of it in its greatest Glory Splendour and Efficacy a Promise is made in the Time of David of another Priest of another Order to arise Hereof there can be no Account given but this alone that Perfection was not attainable by that which was already instituted and executed For it was a Perfection that God aimed to bring his Church unto or the most Perfect state in Righteousness Peace Liberty and VVorship which it is capable of in this world And whatever state the Church be brought into it must be by its High Priest and the Discharge of his Office Now if this might have been effected by the Levitical Priesthood the rising of another Priest was altogether needless and useless This is that Invincible Argument whereby the Holy Apostle utterly overthrows the
Change of the Priesthood as that which was proved before and an Inference from thence unto a Necessity of the change of the Law The Priesthood being changed that is the Priesthood of Levi appointed and exercised under the Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 translato mutato so some read transferred translated some changed The former do not reach the whole sence intended For the Office of the Priesthood may be transferred from one Person to another one Family unto another yea one Tribe unto another and yet the Priesthood as to the kind and nature of it continue the same This our Apostle afterwards mentions ver 13 14. as a part of his Argument to prove the Priesthood it self to be changed But this it doth not absolutely seeing it is possible that the Office may be transferred from one Tribe unto another and yet not be changed as unto its Nature But the Proof lies in this That Moses in the Institution of the Priesthood made no mention of the Tribe of Judah and therefore if that Office be transferred unto that Tribe it must be of another kind than that before Instituted And on this Supposition that which he intends to prove follows evidently upon the Translation of the Priesthood For all the Sacred Services and Worship which the Law required were so confined or at least had that respect unto the Levitical Priesthood as that no part of it no Sacred Duty could be performed on a Supposition of taking away the Priesthood from that Tribe and Family For whereas the whole of their Worship consisted in the Service and Sacrifices of the Tabernacle God had appointed that whosoever did draw nigh unto the performance of any of these Services that was not of the Seed of Aaron should be cut off and destroyed Wherefore upon a Supposition of the ceasing or changing of the Priesthood in that Family the whole Law of Ordinances became Unpracticable Useless and lost its Power especially seeing there was no Provision made in the Law it self for a Priesthood in any other Tribe Besides such was the contexture of the Law and such the Sanction of it Cursed is he who continueth not in all things written in the Law to do them that if any thing be taken out of it if its Order be disturbed if any Alteration be made or any Transgression be dispensed withal or exempted from the Curse the whole Fabrick must of Necessity fall unto the Ground But yet it is not a meer transferring of the Priesthood from one Tribe unto another that is here intended by the Apostle For there is such a change of the Priesthood as there is of the Law But the change of the Law was an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a disanulling or abolishing as is affirmed ver 18. Such therefore must the change of the Priesthood be and so it was The Priesthood was changed in that one kind of it was utterly abolished and another introduced So was the Levitical Priesthood changed as that the other Priest which came with his Office in the room thereof could not be called or said to be after the Order of Aaron but was of another kind Typed out by Melchisedec It may therefore be enquired on what Grounds this Priesthood was to be so abolished or how it appears that so it is and by what means it was actually taken away That it was so to be abolished the Apostle proves 1. Because before the Institution of that Priesthood there was another far more Excellent namely that of Melchisedec 2. That the Holy Ghost had declared that the Introduction of that more Excellent Priesthood for a Season was to prefigure and represent another Priesthood that was afterwards to be established And this could not be that of Levi seeing God doth not make use of that which is more Excellent to figure or represent that which is Inferiour thereunto Another Priesthood therefore must arise and be granted unto the Church in answer unto that Type 3. That it was impossible that this new Priest after the Order of Melchisedec should be consistent with that of Levi or that it shoudl be continued after that was brought in For 1. He was to be of another Tribe as he immediately proves 2. Because his Priesthood and Sacrifice were to be of another kind than that of Levi which he demonstrates at large in the ensuing Chapters 3. Because on the other hand the Priesthood of Aaron 1. Could never Accomplish and Effect the true and proper Ends of the Priesthood which the Church stood in need of and without which it could not be Consummate And 2. Was in its own Nature Offices Works and Duties inconsistent with any Priesthood that was not of its own Order It must therefore be abolished It may therefore be enquired how the Priesthood was changed or that of the House of Levi taken away And I say as the Apostle directs it was done by the Appointment of God For his Introduction of another Priest when it was actually accomplished had the force of a Repealing law The Institution of the former was abrogated thereby without any other Constitution For as unto its Use it did hence cease of it self It had no more to do its work was at an end and its Services of no Advantage to the Church For the Sign of what is to come is set aside when the thing signified is brought in and ceaseth to be a Sign Yea the continuance of it would give a Testimony against it self And as to its Right this new Institution of God applyed by his own Authority unto it in its proper Season took it away 2. The Application of the Authority of God in the Institution of a new Priesthood to take away the old was made by the Holy Ghost in the Revelation of the will of God by the Gospel wherein the ceasing of it was declared And sundry things may be observed concerning this abolishing of it 1. Notwithstanding the great and many provocations of them by whom it was exercised and discharged yet God took it not away until it had accomplished the End whereunto it was designed Neither the wickedness of the People nor of the Priests themselves could provoke the Lord to revoke his Institution until the appointed End of it was come And it is no small part of the Blindness of the present Jews to think that God would so utterly abolish his own Ordinance as they must acknowledge he hath done if he would have it to be of any longer Use in the Church For 1600 Years they have not had any Priest among them nor is it possible they should according unto the Law if they were actually restored unto their own pretended Right in Canaan For they have utterly lost the Distinction of Tribes among them nor can any of them in the least pretend that they are of the linage of the Priests And for any one to Usurp that Office who is not lineally Descended from Aaron they own to be an Abomination As therefore they
evidence of his Glory and Power as introduced him against all Opposition For when the appointed time is come wherein the Decrees of God shall bring forth and his Counsel be accomplished all Difficulties though appearing insuperable shall vanish and disappear Zech. 4. 6 7. 4. The Nature of his Priesthood is declared in its Resemblance unto that of Melchisedec 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Apostle intendeth not to express the words of the Psalmist 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which he constantly renders 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according unto the Order but he respects the whole Conformity that was between Melchisedec and our Lord Jesus Christ in the instances which he had before insisted on For whereas God had ordered all things in the Scripture concerning Melchisedec that he might be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ver 3. made like unto the Son of God he is said to arise 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to the likeness or similitude of Melchisedec For every Similitude is mutual one thing is as like unto another as that is unto it This therefore is evident that there was to be another Priest 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 meerly another but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one of another Stock and Race and a Priest he was to be after the Similitude of Melchisedec and not so much as after the Similitude of Aaron The arising of Christ in his Offices puts an end unto all other things that pretend an usefulness unto the same end with them When he arose as a King he did not put an end unto the Office and Power of Kings in the World but he did so unto the Typical Kingdoms over the Church as he did to the Priesthood by arising as a Priest And when he ariseth spiritually in the Hearts and Consciences of Believers an end is put unto all other things that they might before look for life or Righteousness or Salvation by VER 16. This Verse containeth an Illustration and Confirmation of the foregoing Assertion by a Declaration of the way and manner how this other Priest who was not of the Seed of Aaron should come unto that Office And this was necessary also for the prevention of an Objection which the whole Discourse was obnoxious unto For it might be said that whatever was affirmed concerning another Priest yet there was no way possible whereby any one might come so to be unless he were of the Family of Aaron All others were expressely excluded by the Law Nor was there any way or means ordained of God any especial Sacrifice instituted whereby such a Priest might be dedicated and initiated into his Office In prevention of this Objection and Confirmation of what was before declared the Apostle adds Who was made not after the Law of a Carnal Commandment but after the Power of an Endless Life The words declare 1. That this Priest was made so and 2. How he was made so both negatively and positively 1. He was made so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which Priest was made or who was made a Priest The force of this Expression hath been explained on Chap. 3. 2. and Chap. 5. 5. The Lord Christ did not meerly on his own Authority and Power take this Office upon himself He became so he was made so by the Appointment and Designation of the Father Nor did he do any thing in the whole work of his Mediation but in Obedience unto his Command and in compliance with his Will For it is the Authority of God alone which is the Foundation of all Office Duty and Power in the Church Even what Christ himself is and was unto the Church he is and was so by the Grace and Authority of God even the Father By him was he sent his will did he perform through his Grace did he die by his Power was he exalted and with him doth he intercede What Acts of God in particular do concur unto the constitution of this Office of Christ and to the making him a Priest have been declared before 2. The manner of his being made a Priest is expressed Negatively 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not after or not according unto the Law of a Carnal Commandment Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Law of Bodily Commandments It is unquestionable that the Apostle by this Expression intendeth in the first place the Law of the Levitical Priesthood or the way and manner whereby the Aaronical Priests were first called and vested with their Office and then any other Law Constitution Rule or Order of the same kind He was made a Priest neither by that Law nor any other like unto it And two things we must enquire into 1. Why the Call of the Aaronical Priests is said to be after the Law of Commandment 2. Why this Commandment is said to be Fleshly 1. For the first we may observe that the whole Law of Worship among the Jews is called by our Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ephes. 2. 15. The Law of Commandments in Ordinances And it is so called for two Reasons 1. Because Commands were so multiplyed therein that the whole Law was denominated from them Hence it became 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Yoke hardly to be born if not altogether intolerable Acts 15. 10. 2. Because of that Severity wherewith Obedience was exacted A Command in its formal Notion expresseth Authority and the multiplication of them Severity And both these God designed to make Eminent in that Law whence it hath this denomination a Law of Commandments Hereof the Law of the constitution of the Office of the Priesthood and the Call of Aaron thereunto was a part and he was therefore made a Priest by the Law of Commandments that is by a Preceptive Law as a part of that System of Commands wherein the whole Law consisted See this Law and all the Commands of it Exod. 28. throughout 2. Why doth the Apostle call this Commandment Carnal or Fleshly Answ. It may be on either of these three Accounts 1. With respect unto the Sacrifices which were the principal part of the consecration of Aaron unto his Office And these may be called Fleshly on two Accounts 1. Because of their Subject-matter they were Flesh or the Bodies of Beasts as the Syriack reads these words the Commandment of Bodies that is of Beasts to be Sacrificed 2. In themselves and their Relation unto the Jewish State they reached no further than the purifying of the Flesh. They Sanctified unto the Purifying of the Flesh as the Apostle speaks Chap. 9. 13. And thus the whole Commandment should be denominated from the principal Subject-matter or the Offering of Fleshly Sacrifices unto the Purifying of the Flesh. 2. It may be called Carnal because a Priesthood was Instituted thereby which was to be continued by Carnal Propagation only the Priesthood appointed by that Law was confined unto the Carnal Seed and Posterity of Aaron wherein this other Priest had no Interest 3. Respect may be
had unto the whole System of those Laws and Institutions of Worship which our Apostle as was also before observed calls Carnal Ordinances imposed unto the Time of Reformation Chap. 9. 10. They were all Carnal in opposition unto the Dispensation of the Spirit under the Gospel and the Institutions thereof None of these ways was the Lord Christ made a Priest He was not dedicated unto his Office by the Sacrifice of Beasts but Sanctified himself thereunto when he Offered himself through the Eternal Spirit unto God and was consummate in his own Blood He was not of the Carnal Seed of Aaron nor did nor could claim any Succession unto the Priesthood by virtue of an Extraction from his Race And no constitution of the Law in general no Ordinance of it did convey unto him either Right or Title unto the Priesthood It is therefore Evident that he was in no sense made a Priest according to the Law of a Carnal Commandment neither had he either Right Power or Authority to exercise the Sacerdotal Function in the observation of any Carnal Rites or Ordinances whatever And we may observe That what seemed to be wanting unto Christ in his entrance into any of his Offices or in the Discharge of them was on the account of a greater Glory Aaron was made a Priest with a great outward Solemnity The Sacrifices which were Offered and the Garments he put on with his visible separation from the rest of the People had a great Ceremonial Glory in them There was nothing of all this nor any thing like unto it in the Consecration of the Lord Christ unto his Office But yet indeed these things had no Glory in comparison of that excelling Glory which accompanied those invisible Acts of Divine Authority VVisdom and Grace which communicated his Office unto him And indeed in the VVorship of God who is a Spirit all outward Ceremony is a diminution and debasement of it Hence were Ceremonies for Beauty and Glory multiplyed under the Old Testament but yet as the Apostle shews were all but Carnal But as the sending of Christ himself and his Investiture with all his Offices were by Secret and Invisible Acts of God and his Spirit so all Evangelical VVorship as to the Glory of it is Spiritual and Internal only And the removal of the Old Pompous Ceremonies from our VVorship is but the taking away of the Veil which hindred from an insight and entrance into the Holy place 2. The way and manner whereby the Lord Christ was made a Priest is expressed positively 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But according unto the Power of an indissoluble Life 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 denotes an Opposition between the way rejected and this asserted as those which were not consistent He was not made a Priest that way but this How is Christ then made a Priest according to the Power of an endless Life That is saith one in his Paraphrase installed into the Priesthood after his Resurrection VVhat is meant by installed I well know not It should seem to be the same with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Consecrated Dedicated Initiated And if so this Exposition diverts wholly from the Truth For Christ was installed into his Office of Priesthood before his Resurrection or he did not Offer himself as a Sacrifice unto God in his Death and Blood-shedding And to suppose that the Lord Christ discharged and performed the principal Act of his Sacerdotal Office which was but once to be performed before he was installed a Priest is contradictory to Scripture and Reason it self Ideo ad vitam im mortalem perductus est ut in aeternum sacrdos noster esset He was therefore brought unto an Immortal Life that he might be our Priest for ever saith another But this is not to be made a Priest according to the Power of an endless Life If he means that he might always continue to be a Priest and to execute that Office always unto the consummation of all things what he says is true but not the sence of this place but if he means that he became Immortal after his Resurrection that he might be our Priest and abide so for ever it excludes his Oblation in his Death from being a proper Sacerdotal Act which that it was I have sufficiently proved elsewhere against Crellius and others Some think that the endless life intended is that of Believers which the Lord Christ by virtue of his Priestly Office confers upon them The Priests under the Law proceeded no further but to discharge Carnal Rites which could not confer Eternal life on them for whom they Ministred But the Lord Christ in the Discharge of his Office procureth Eternal Redemption and Everlasting life for Believers And these things are true but they comprise not the meaning of the Apostle in this place For how can Christ be made a Priest according to the Power of that Eternal Life which he confers on others For the comparison and opposition that is made between the Law of a Carnal Commandment whereby Aaron was constituted a Priest and the Power of an endless Life whereby Christ was made so do Evidence that the making of Christ a Priest not absolutely which the Apostle treats not of but such a Priest as he is was the Effect of this endless Life VVherefore the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the indissoluble Life here intended is the life of Christ himself Hereunto belonged or from hence did proceed that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Power whereby he was made a Priest And both the Office it self and the Execution or Discharge of it are here intended And as to the Office it self this Eternal or endless life of Christ is his life as the Son of God Hereon depends his own Mediatory life for ever and his conferring of Eternal life on us John 5. 26 27. And to be a Priest by virtue of or according unto this Power stands in direct opposition unto the Law of a Carnal Commandment It must therefore be enquired how the Lord Christ was made a Priest according unto this power And I say it was because thereby alone he was rendred meet to discharge that Office wherein God was to redeem his Church with his own Blood Acts 20. 28. By Power therefore here both meetness and ability are intended And both these the Lord Christ had from his Divine Nature and his endless life therein Or it may be the Life of Christ in his Humane Nature is intended in opposition unto those Priests who being made so by the Law of a Carnal Commandment did not continue in the Discharge of their Office by reason of Death as our Apostle observes afterwards But it will be said that this Natural life of Christ the life of the Humane Nature was not Endless but had an End put unto it in the Dissolution of his Soul and Body on the Cross. I say therefore this life of Christ was not absolutely the life of the Humane Nature considered separately from his
moment of his being a Priest he abode so alwaies without interruption or intermission This is the meaning of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He in his own Person abideth Nor doth the Apostle say that he did not dye but only that he abideth alwaies 3. It followeth from hence that he hath an unchangeable Priesthood A Priesthood subject to no change or alteration that cannot pass away But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is sacerdotium successivum per successionem ab uno alteri traditum Such a Priesthood as which when one hath attained it abideth not with him but he delivereth over unto another as Aaron did his unto Eleazar his Son or it falls unto another by some Right or Law of Succession A Priesthood that goes from hand to hand 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a Priesthood that doth not passe from one unto another And this the Apostle seems directly to intend as is evident from the Antithesis The Priests after the Order of Aaron were many and that by reason of death Wherefore it was necessary that their Priesthood should pass from one to another by Succession So that when one received it he that went before him ceased to be a Priest And so it was either the Predecessors were taken off by death or on any other just occasion as it was in the case of Abiathar who was put from the Priests Office by Solomon 1 King 2. 27. How beit our Apostle mentions their going off by death only because that was the ordinary way and which was provided for in the Law With the Lord Christ it was otherwise He received his Priesthood from none Although he had sundry Types yet he had no Predecessor And he hath none to succeed him nor can have any added or joyned unto him in his Office The whole office of the Priesthood of the Covenant and the entire administration of it are confined unto his Person There are no more that follow him than went before him The Expositors of the Roman Church are greatly perplexed in the reconciling of this Passage of the Apostle unto the present Priesthood of their Church And they may well be so seeing they are undoubtedly irreconcileable Some of them say that Peter succeeded unto Christ in his Priesthood as Eleazar did unto Aaron So Ribera some of them deny that he hath any Successor properly so called Successorem non habet nec it a quisquam Catholicus loquitur si bene circumspectè loqui velit saith Estius But it is openly evident that some of them are not so circumspect as Estius would have them but do plainly affirm that Peter was Christs Successor A Lapide indeed affirms that Peter did not succeed unto Christ as Eleazar did unto Aaron because Eleazar had the Priesthood in the same degree and dignity with Aaron and so had not Peter with Christ. But yet that he had the same Priesthood with him a Priesthood of the same kind he doth not deny That which they generally fix upon is that their Priests have not another Priesthood or offer another Sacrifice but are Partakers of his Priesthood and minister under him and so are not his Successors but his Vicars which I think is the worst composure of this difficulty they could have thought upon For 1. This is directly contrary unto the words and design of the Apostle For the Reason he assigns why the Priesthood of Christ doth not passe from him unto any other is because he abides himself for ever to discharge the Office of it Now this excludes all subordination and conjunction all Vicars as well as Successors unless we shall suppose that although he doth thus abide yet is he one way or other disabled to discharge his Office 2. The Successors of Aaron had no more another Priesthood but what he had than it is pretended that the Roman Priests have no other Priesthood but what Christ had Nor did they offer any other Sacrifice than what he offered as these Priests pretend to offer the same Sacrifice that Christ did So that still the case is the same between Aaron and his Successors and Christ and his Substitutes 3. They say that Christ may have Substitutes in his Office though he abide a Priest still and although the office still continue the same unchangeable So God in the Government of the world makes use of Judges and Magistrates yet is himself the Supreme Rector of all But this Pretence is vain also For they do not substitute their Priests unto him in that which he continueth to do himself but in that which he doth not which he did indeed and as a Priest ought to do but now ceaseth to do for ever in his own Person For the principal Act of the Sacerdotal Office of Christ consisted in his Oblation or his offering himself a Sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour unto God This he did once and ceaseth for ever from doing so any more But these Priests are assigned to offer him in Sacrifice every day as partakers of the same Priesthood with him which is indeed not to be his Substitutes but his Successors and to take his Office out of his hand as if he were dead and could henceforth discharge it no more For they do not appoint Priests to intercede in his room because they grant he continueth himself so to do but to offer Sacrifice in his stead because he doth so no more Wherefore if that be an Act of Priesthood and of their Priesthood as is pretended it is unavoidable that his Priesthood is passed from him unto them Now this is a blasphemous Imagination and directly contrary both unto the words of the Apostle and the whole Design of his Argument Nay it would lay the advantage on the other side For the Priests of the Order of Aaron had that Priviledge that none could take their Office upon them nor officiate in it whilst they were alive But although Christ abideth for ever yet according unto the sense of these men and their practice thereon he stands in need of others to officiate for him and that in the principal part of his Duty and Office For Offer himself in Sacrifice unto God he neither now doth nor can seeing henceforth he dieth no more This is the work of the Mass-Priests alone who must therefore be honoured as Christs Successors or be abhorred as his Murderers for the Sacrifice of him must be by blood and death The Argument of the Apostle as it is exclusive of this Imagination so it is cogent unto his purpose For so he proceedeth That Priesthood which changeth not but is alwaies vested in the same Person and in him alone is more excellent than that which was subject to change continually from one hand unto another For that Transmission of it from one unto another was an effect of weakness and Imperfection And the Jews grant that the frequency of their change under the second Temple was a Token of Gods displeasure But thus it was with the Priesthood of
the Lord Christ was made a Priest thereby hath been before at large declared The Apostle takes notice of it here only as it was given out in prophecy by David which was but a Solemn Declaration of the Eternal compact between the Father and the Son 2. The Difference of the Time wherein these Priesthoods were ordained is included on the one hand and expressed on the other For the former it was when the Law was given whereby they were made Priests the latter was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 after the Law or the giving of it This I confess doth not appear at first view to be to the advantage of the Apostles Design namely that this Oath was after the Law For in another place he expresly argues on the other hand that what is first in such cases hath the Preeminence and cannot be disanulled by what doth ensue Gal. 3. 17. And this I say that the Covenant that was confirmed before of God in Christ the Law which was four hundred and thirty years after cannot disanul that it should make the Promise of none effect May it not be as well said that this Oath which was declared about four hundred years after the giving of the Law could not disanul it or make it of none effect The Objection being not without its difficulty I shall spend a little time in the full solution of it I answer therefore That what followeth after cannot Disanul what went before 1. If that which is afterwards introduced be consistent with what was before established For in that case there is no intimation of the Pleasure of God that it should be disanulled He may add what he will unto what is already ordained so it be consistent with it without prejudicing the first Institution 2. Especially it cannot do so if it be inferior unto that which went before either in Dignity or use and benefit and so be made subservient unto it 3. And it must be invalid unto any such Purpose if it had no other antecedent foundation that did indeed precede the former Grant for if it have so it may rationally be supposed to be farther declared on purpose to supersede it Now thus it was with the Law in respect unto the Promise which as the Apostle proves going before it could not be disanulled by it For 1. The Law as it was then ordained of God was consistent with the Promise Yea and given in the pursuit of it so as that there was no need that any should forsake the Promise to comply with the Will of God in giving the Law 2. The Law as it was inferior in Dignity and Use unto the Promise so it was made subordinate and subservient unto it For the man end of giving the Law was to guide and direct the Church unto the right use and benefit of the Promise 3. The Promise had an absolute priority above the Law There was no Ground or Foundation laid for the Law no intimation of its future introduction before the giving of the Promise And therefore the Promise could not be disannulled by it But in the present case all things are otherwise For 1. The Priesthood confirmed by an Oath and introduced after the Law was utterly inconsistent with the Law and the Priesthood thereof This the Apostle hath fully proved before Wherefore of necessity either the Law and the Priesthood of it must be disannulled or the Oath of God must be of none effect For what he had sworn unto was inconsistent with the continuance of what was before appointed for a time 2. This new Priesthood could no way be made subordinate or subservient unto the other so as to leave it a place in the Church But as it was eminently above it in Dignity and Benefit so the use of the other was only to be an Introduction unto it and therefore must cease thereon 3. This Priesthood had its Reasons Grounds Foundation and Representation long before the giving of the Law For besides that it had a virtual constitution in the first Promise 2000 years before the giving of the Law it had also a Typical Representation before it in the Priesthood of Melchisedek and it received only a Declaration and Confirmation in the Account given of the Oath of God after the Law Wherefore the direct contrary is here the matter in hand unto what is spoken unto in that other Argument of the Apostle And therein the first thing namely the Promise was confirmed by an Oath the latter was not But here the latter which was after the Law was confirmed by the Oath of God which the Law was not And hereon its being after the Law is a sufficient Evidence of its preeminence above the Law and all the Institutions of it For hereby was that introduced which was to supply all the defects and weaknesses of the Law and its Priesthood and so to disanul them and take them out of the way 3. The third Difference is that the Law made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Men to be High Priests that is those who were meer men and no more And therefore notwithstanding the Office and Dignity which they were called and exalted unto they were all but servants in the House of God nor could they be any other as the Apostle proves Chap. 3. 5. In opposition hereunto the Word of the Oath makes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Son an High Priest that Son who is Lord over the whole House and whose the House is as he declares in the same place ver 5 6. And in this word the Apostle openeth the necessity and Dignity of the Priesthood of the New Testament For it consists in the Dignity of the Person designed unto that Office This was no other nor could be other but the Son the Eternal Son of God Filium nempe Dei non hominem caeteris parem nascendi sorte saith Grotius as though Christ were here called the Son that is the Son of God because he was differenced from other Men in the way and manner of his birth being born of a Virgin But this is not the true and formal Reason of this Denomination Christ is the Son of God by Eternal Generation and thereon alone doth his Sonship depend But many ways there were whereby he was manifested so to be especially by his miraculous Conception and Nativity and by his Resurrection from the Dead Hence with respect unto them he is sometimes called the Son of God not that he became so thereby but was only declared so to be This therefore the Apostle resolves the force of his Argument into namely the Dignity of the Person of our High Priest he was the Son of God for hereon the whole excellency and efficacy of his Priesthood doth depend 4. It is added in the last place that the Law made men Priests 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that had infirmity subject to infirmities And these were of two sorts Moral and Natural neither could they be freed from either of
re praeteritâ loquatur Respons ad cap. x. But as Beza very well observes the Apostle had before mentioned the one offering of Christ as already perfected and compleated Chap. 7. 27. He cannot therefore speak of it now but as that which was past and here he only shews how necessary it was that he should have himself to offer and so to offer himself as he had done And from these words we may observe 1. That there was no salvation to be had for us no not by Jesus Christ himself without his Sacrifice and Oblation It was of necessity that he should have somewhat to offir as well as those Priests had of old according to the Law Some would have it that the Lord Christ is our Saviour because he declared unto us the way of salvation and gave us an example of the way whereby we may attain it in his own personal obedience But whence then was it of necessity that he must have somewhat to offer unto God as our Priest that is for us For this belongeth neither unto his Doctrine nor Example And it was necessary that he should have somewhat to offer in answer unto those Sacrifices of old which were offered for the expiation of sin Nor would our salvation be otherwise effected by any other Acts or Duties of our High Priest For the Church could not be saved without taking away the guilt of sin And the whole design of the Priests and Sacrifices of old was to teach and instruct the Church how alone this might be performed And this was only by making atonement for it by Sacrifice wherein the Beast sacrificed did suffer in the room of the Sinner and did by Gods institution bear his iniquity And this our Apostle hath respect unto and the realizing of all those Typical Representations in Christ without which his whole discourse is useless and vain Wherefore there was no other way for our salvation but by a real propitiation or atonement made for our sins And whosoever looketh for it otherwise but in the faith and virtue thereof will be deceived 2. As God designed unto the Lord Christ the work which he had to do so he provided for him and furnished him with whatever was necessary thereunto Somewhat he must have to offer And this could not be any thing which was the matter of the Sacrifices of the Priests of old For all those Sacrifices were appropriated unto the discharge of the Priesthood And besides they were none of them able to effect that which he was designed to do Wherefore a body did God prepare for him as is declared at large Chap. 10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 c. 3. The Lord Christ being to save the Church in the way of Office he was not to be spared in any thing necessary thereunto And in conformity unto him 4. Whatever state or condition we are called unto what is necessary unto that state is indispensibly required of us So is Holiness and Obedience required unto a state of Reconciliation and Peace with God VER IV. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 VUl. Lat. si esset super terram all others in terra to the same purpose Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Earth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 even also he should not be a Priest 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Vulgar omits 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and renders the words cum essent qui offerrent Rhem. Whereas there were who did offer The Syriack agrees with the Original Manentibus illis Sacerdotibus quum sint alii Sacerdotes In the preceding Discourses the Apostle hath fully proved that the Introduction of this new Priesthood under the Gospel had put an end unto the old and that it was necessary so it should do because as he had abundantly discovered in many instances it was utterly insufficient to bring us unto God or to make the Church-State perfect And withall he had declared the nature of this new Priesthood In particular he hath shewed that although this High Priest offered his great expiatory Sacrifice once for all yet the consummation of this Sacrifice and the derivation of the Benefits of it unto the Church depended on the following discharge of his Office with his personal state and condition therein For so was it with the High Priest under the Law as unto his great Anniversary Sacrifice at the Feast of Expiation whose efficacy depended on his entrance afterwards into the holy place Wherefore he declares this state of our High Priest to be spiritual and heavenly as consisting in the Ministry of his own Body in the Sanctuary of Heaven Having fully manifested these things unfolding the mystery of them he proceeds in this Verse to shew how necessary it was that so it should be namely that he should neither offer the things appointed in the Law nor yet abide in the state and condition of a Priest here on earth as those other Priests did In brief he proves that he was not in any thing to take on him the Administration of holy things in the Church according as they were then established by Law For whereas it might be objected If the Lord Christ was an High Priest as he pleaded why then did he not administer the holy things of the Church according to the duty of a Priest To which he replies That so he was not to do yea a supposition that he might do so was inconsistent with his Office and destructive both of the Law and the Gospel For it would utterly overthrow the Law for one that was not of the Line of Aaron to officiate in the holy place and God had by the Law made provision of others that there was neither room nor place for his Ministry And the Gospel also would have been of no use thereby seeing the Sacrifice which it is built upon would have been of the same nature with those under the Law This the Apostle confirms in this Verse For indeed if he were on earth he should not be a Priest seeing that there are Priests that offer Gifts according to the Law The words are an Hypothetical Proposition with the Reason or Confirmation of it The Proposition is in the former part of the Verse For if indeed he were on the earth he should not be a Priest Hereof the remainder of the words is the Reason or Confirmation Seeing that there are Priests that offer Gifts according unto the Law And we may consider first the Causal Connexion For which relates unto what he had discoursed immediately before as introducing a Reason why things ought to be as he had declared He had in sundry instances manifested his present state and condition with the way and manner of the discharge of his Office A Priest he was and therefore he must have somewhat to offer which must be somewhat of his own seeing the Law would not accommodate him with a Sacrifice nor yet the whole Creation the Law having prepossessed unto its own use all that was clean and fit
to be offered unto God A Sanctuary he must also have wherein to officiate and this was to be Heaven itself because he was himself exalted into Heaven and set down at the right hand of God And of all this there was yet another especial Reason For if he were on the earth c. If indeed he were on earth The Emphasis of the Particle Per is not to be omitted If really it were so or therein is Force granted unto the Concession that the Apostle here makes truly it must be so If he were on Earth includes two things 1. His continuance and abode on the Earth If he were not exalted into Heaven in the discharge of his Office if he were not at the right hand of God if he were not entred into the heavenly Sanctuary but could have discharged his whole Office here on the Earth without any of these things If he were thus on the Earth or thus to have been on the Earth 2. The state and condition of his Priesthood If he were on the Earth or had a Priesthood of the same order and constitution with that of the Law if he were to have offered the same Sacrifices or of the same kind with them which were to be perfected on the Earth if he were not to have offered himself wherein his Sacrifice could not be absolutely consummate without the presentation of himself in the most holy place not made with hands These two things the Apostle was treating of 1 His present state and condition as to the Sanctuary wherein he administred which was heavenly 2 His Sacrifice and Tabernacle which was himself in opposition unto both these is this Supposition made If he were on the Earth This therefore is the full sense of this Supposition which is well to be observed to clear the meaning of the whole Verse which the Socinians endeavor with all their skill and force to wrest unto their Heresie If we did aver him to have such a Priesthood as in the discharge thereof he were always to continue on the Earth and to administer in the Sanctuary of the Tabernacle or Temple with the blood of legal Sacrifices On this Supposition the Apostle grants that he could not be a Priest He had not been or could not be so much as a Priest or a Priest at all in any sense That a Priest he was to be and that of necessity he must be so he had proved before And on the occasion thereof he declares the nature of his Sacrifice Tabernacle and Sanctuary and now proves that they were so necessary for him that without them he could not have been a Priest It will be said that he was a Priest on the Earth and that therein he offered his great Expiatory Sacrifice in and by his own blood And it is true But 1 This was not on the Earth in the sense of the Law which alone appointed the Sacrifices on the Earth it was not in the way nor after the manner of the Sacrifices of the Law which are expressed by that Phrase on the Earth 2 Although his Oblation or Sacrifice of himself was compleat on the Earth yet the whole Service belonging thereunto to make it effectual in the behalf of them for whom it was offered could not be accomplished on the Earth Had he not entred into Heaven to make a representation of his Sacrifice in the holy place he could not have been the High Priest of the Church from that offering of himself because the Church could have enjoyed no benefit thereby Nor would he ever have offered that Sacrifice if he had been to abide on the Earth and not afterwards to have entred the heavenly Sanctuary to make it effectual The High Priest on the great day of Expiation perfected his Sacrifice for his own sin and the sins of the people without the Tabernacle But yet he neither could nor would nor ought to have attempted the offering of it had it not been with a design to carry the blood into the holy place to sprinkle it before the Ark and Mercy-seat the Throne of Grace So was Christ to enter into the holy place not made with hands or he could not have been a Priest The reason of this Assertion and Concession is added in the latter part of the Verse Seeing there are Priests that offer Gifts according to the Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sacerdotibus existentibus cum sint Sacerdotes whereas there are Priests The Apostle doth not grant that at that time when he wrote this Epistle there were legal Priests de jure offering Sacrifices according to the Law De facto indeed there were yet such Priests ministring in the Temple which was yet standing But in this whole Epistle as to right and acceptance with God he proves that their Office was ceased and their administrations useless Wherefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 respects the legal Institution of the Priests and their right to officiate then when the Lord Christ offered his Sacrifice Then there were Priests who had a right to officiate in their Office and to offer Gifts according to the Law Two things are to be inquired into to give us the sense of these words and the force of the Reason in them 1. Why might not the Lord Christ be a Priest and offer his Sacrifice continuing on the Earth to consummate it notwithstanding the continuance of these Priests according unto the Law 2. Why did he not in the first place take away and abolish this order of Priests and so make way for the Introduction of his own Priesthood I answer unto the first That if he had been a Priest on the Earth to have discharged the whole work of his Priesthood here below whil'st they were Priests also then he must either have been of the same order with them or of another and have offered Sacrifices of the same kind as they did or Sacrifices of another kind But neither of these could be For he could not be of the same order with them This the Apostle proves because he was of the Tribe of Judah which was excluded from the Priesthood in that it was appropriated unto the Tribe of Levi and Family of Aaron And therefore also he could not offer the same Sacrifices with them for none might do so by the Law but themselves And of another order together with them he could not be For there is nothing foretold of Priests of several Orders in the Church at the same time Yea as we have proved before the Introduction of a Priesthood of another order was not only inconsistent with that Priesthood but destructive of the Law itself and all its Institutions Wherefore whil'st they continued Priests according to the Law Christ could not be a Priest among them neither of their order nor of another that is if the whole administration of his Office had been upon the Earth together with theirs He could not be a Priest among them 2. Unto the second Inquiry I
all our sins The Sanctification or Renovation of our Natures and the Justification of our Persons being promised herein seeing infinite power and grace are required unto them He alone must make this Covenant with whom all power and grace do dwell God hath spoken once twice have I heard this that power belongeth unto God also unto thee O Lord belongeth mercy Psal. 62. 11 12. 6 The Reward promised in this Covenant is God himself I am thy Reward And who but God can ordain himself to be our Reward Ob. All the efficacy and glory of the New Covenant do originally arise from and are resolved into the Author and Supreme Cause of it which is God himself And we might consider unto the encouragement of our Faith and the strengthning of our consolation 1 His infinite condescension to make and enter into Covenant with poor lost fallen sinful man This no heart can fully conceive no tongue can express only we live in hope to have yet a more clear prospect of it and to have an holy admiration of it unto Eternity 2 His wisdom goodness and grace in the nature of that Covenant which he hath condescended to make and enter into The first Covenant he made with us in Adam which we brake was in itself good holy righteous and just it must be so because it was also made by him But there was no provision made in it absolutely to preserve us from that woful disobedience and transgression which would make it void and frustrate all the holy and blessed ends of it Nor was God obliged so to preserve us having furnished us with a sufficiency of ability for our own preservation so as we could no way fall but by a wilful Apostasie from him But this Covenant is of that nature as that the grace administred in it shall effectually preserve all the Covenanters unto the end and secure unto them all the benefits of it For 3 His power and faithfulness are engaged unto the accomplishment of all the Promises of it And these Promises do contain every thing that is spiritually and eternally good or desirable unto us O Lord our Lord how excellent is thy Name in all the Earth How glorious art thou in the ways of thy grace towards poor sinful Creatures who had destroyed themselves And 4 He hath made no created good but himself only to be our Reward Secondly The Persons with whom this Covenant is made are also expressed The House of Israel and the House of Judah Long before the giving of this Promise that People were divided into two parts The one of them in way of distinction from the other retained the name of Israel These were the Ten Tribes which fell off from the House of David under the conduct of Ephraim whence they are often also in the Prophets called by that name The other consisting of the Tribe properly so called with that of Benjamin and the greatest part of Levi took the name of Judah and with them both the Promise and the Church remained in a peculiar manner But whereas they all originally sprang from Abraham who received the Promise and sign of Circumcision for them all and because they were all equally in their Forefather brought into the Bond of the Old Covenant they are here mentioned distinctly that none of the Seed of Abraham might be excluded from the tender of this Covenant Unto the whole Seed of Abraham according to the flesh it was that the terms and grace of this Covenant was first to be offered So Peter tells them in his first Sermon That the Promise was unto them and their Children who were there present that is the House of Judah and to them that are afar off that is the House of Israel in their dispersions Acts 2. 39. So again he expresseth the order of the dispensation of this Covenant with respect to the Promise made to Abraham Acts 3. 25 26. Ye are the Children of the Prophets and of the Covenant which God made with our Fathers saying unto Abraham and in thy Seed shall all the Kindreds of the earth be blessed unto you first God having raised his Son Jesus sent him to bless you namely in the preaching of the Gospel So our Apostle in his Sermon unto them affirmed that it was necessary that the Word should be first spoken unto them Acts 13. 46. And this was all the Priviledge that was now left unto them For the Partition-wall was now broken down and all Obstacles against the Gentiles taken out of the way Wherefore this House of Israel and of Judah may be considered two ways 1 As that People were the whole entire Posterity of Abraham 2 As they were typical and mystically significant of the whole Church of God Hence alone it is that the Promises of Grace under the Old Testament are given unto the Church under those names because they were Types of them who should really and effectually be made Partakers of them In the first sense God made this Covenant with them and this on sundry accounts 1 Because He in and through whom alone it was to be established and made effectual was to be brought forth amongst them of the Seed of Abraham as the Apostle plainly declares Acts 2. 25. 2 Because all things that belonged unto the Ratification of it were to be transacted amongst them 3 Because in the outward dispensation of it the terms and grace of it was first in the counsel of God to be tendred unto them 4 Because by them by the Ministry of men of their Posterity the dispensation of it was to be carried unto all Nations as they were to be blessed in the Seed of Abraham which was done by the Apostles and other Disciples of our Lord Jesus Christ. So the Law of the Redeemer went forth from Sion By this means the Covenant was confirmed with many of them for one week before the calling of the Gentiles Dan. 9. 27. And because these things belonged equally unto them all mention is made distinctly of the House of Israel and the House of Judah For the House of Judah was at the time of the giving of this Promise in the sole possession of all the Priviledges of the Old Covenant Israel having cut off themselves by their revolt from the House of David being cast out also for their sins amongst the Heathen But God to declare that the Covenant he designed had no respect unto those carnal Priviledges which were then in the possession of Judah alone but only unto the Promise made unto Abraham he equals all his Seed with respect unto the mercy of this Covenant In the second sense The whole Church of elect Believers is intended under these denominations being typified by them These are they alone being one made of twain namely Jews and Gentiles with whom the Covenant is really made and established and unto whom the grace of it is actually communicated For all these with whom this Covenant is made shall as really have the
of his power But that our wills are left absolutely herein unto their own liberty and power without being inclined and determined by that grace of God is that Pelagianism which hath long attempted the Church but which shall never absolutely prevail 5. The putting the Laws of God in our minds and the writing of them in our hearts that we may know him and fear him always is promised in the same way and manner as is the forgiveness of sin ver 11. And it is hard to affix such a sense unto that Promise as that God will use such and such means that our sins may be pardoned which yet may all of them fail 6. As this Exposition is no way suited unto the words of the Text nor of the Context or scope of the place so indeed it overthrows the nature of the New Covenant and the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ which comes thereby For 1. If the effect itself or the thing mentioned are not promised but only the use of means left unto the liberty of mens wills whether they will comply with them or no then the very Being of the Covenant whether it shall ever have any existence or no depends absolutely on the wills of men and so may not be For it is not the Proposal of the terms of the Covenant and the means whereby we may enter into it that is called the making of this Covenant with us but our real participation of the grace and mercy promised in it This alone gives a real existence unto the Covenant itself without which it is not a Covenant Nor without it is it properly made with any 2. The Lord Christ would be made hereby the Mediator of an uncertain Covenant For if it depend absolutely on the wills of men whether they will accept of the terms of it and comply with it or no it is uncertain what will be the event and whether ever any one will do so or no. For the will being not determined by Grace what its actings will be is altogether uncertain 3. The Covenant can hereon in no sense be a Testament which our Apostle afterwards proves that it is and that irrevocably ratified by the death of the Testator For there can on this supposition be no certain Heir unto whom Christ did bequeath his Goods and the inheritance of Mercy Grace and Glory This would make this Testament inferior unto that of a wise man who determines in particular unto whom his Goods shall come 4. It takes away that difference between this and the former Covenant which it is the main scope of the Apostle to prove at least leave the difference to consist only in the gradual efficacy of outward means which is most remote from his purpose For there were by the Old Covenant means supplied to induce the People unto constant Obedience and those in their kind powerful This is pleaded by Moses in the whole Book almost of Deuteronomy For the scope of all his exhortation unto Obedience is to shew that God had so instructed them in the knowledge of his Will by giving of the Law and had accompanied his teachings with so many signal mercies such effects of his mighty power goodness and grace that the Covenant accompanied with such Promises and Threatnings that therein life and death temporal and eternal were set before them all which made their Obedience so reasonable and necessary that nothing but Profligacy in wickedness could turn them from it To this purpose are discourses multiplied in that Book And yet notwithstanding all this it is added That God had not circumcised their hearts to fear him and obey him always as it is here promised The communication of grace effectual producing infallibly the good things proposed and promised in the minds and hearts of men belonged not unto that Covenant If therefore there be no more in the making of the New Covenant but only the adding of more forcible outward means and motives more suitable unto our Reasons and meet to work on our Affections it differs only in some unassignable degrees from the former But this is directly contrary unto the promise in the Prophet That it shall not be according unto it or of the same kind no more than Christ the High-Priest of it should be a Priest after the Order of Aaron 5. It would on this Supposition follow That God might fulfill his promise of putting his Laws in the minds of men and writing them in their hearts and yet none have the Law put into their minds nor written in their hearts which things are not reconcileable by any distinction unto the ordinary reason of Mankind Wherefore we must grant That it is the effect the event in the communication of the things promised that is ascribed unto this Covenant and not only the use and application of means unto their production And this will yet further appear in the particular Exposition of the several parts of it But yet before we enter thereon two Objections must be removed which may in general be laid against our interpretation 1. This Covenant is promised as that which is future to be brought in at a certain time after those days as hath been declared But it is certain that the things here mentioned the grace and mercy expressed were really communicated unto many both before and after the giving of the Law long ere this Covenant was made For all who truly believed and feared God had these things effected in them by grace wherefore their effectual communication cannot be esteemed a property of this Covenant which was to be made afterwards Ans. This Objection was sufficiently prevented in what we have already discoursed concerning the efficacy of the grace of this Covenant before itself was solemnly consummated For all things of this nature that belong unto it do arise and spring from the mediation of Christ or his interposition on the behalf of sinners wherefore this took place from the giving of the first Promise the administration of the grace of this Covenant did therein and then take its date Howbeit the Lord Christ had not yet done that whereby it was solemnly to be confirmed and that whereon all the vertue of it did depend Wherefore this Covenant is promised now to be made not in opposition unto what grace and mercy was derived from it both before and under the Law nor as unto the first administration of grace from the Mediator of it but in opposition unto the Covenant of Sinai and with respect unto its outward solemn confirmation 2. If the things themselves are promised in the Covenant then all those with whom this Covenant is made must be really and effectually made partakers of them But this is not so they are not all actually sanctified pardoned and saved which are the things here promised Ans. The making of this Covenant may be considered two ways 1 As unto the preparation and proposition of its terms and conditions 2 As unto the internal stipulation between God
of the continuation of this Teaching may be considered two wayes 1 As it was external in opposition unto and comparison of the effectual internal Teaching by the grace of the New Covenant so it is laid aside not absolutely but comparatively and as it was solitary 2 It may be considered in the manner of it with especial respect unto the Ceremonial Law as it consisted in the observance of sundry Rites and Ceremonies And in this sense it was utterly to cease above all with respect unto the additions which men had made unto the Ceremonial Institutions wherein it did consist Such was their Teaching by writing parts of the Law on their Fringes Frontlets and Doors of their Houses especially as these things were enlarged and Precepts concerning them multiplied in the practice of the Jewish Church It is promised concerning these things that they shall be absolutely removed as useless burdensom and inconsistent with the spiritual Teaching of the New Covenant But as unto that kind of instruction whether by publick stated preaching of the Word or that which is more private and occasional which is subservient unto the promised Teaching of the Spirit of God and which he will and doth make use of in and for the communication of the knowledge itself here promised there is nothing intimated that is derogatory unto its use continuance or necessity A Supposition thereof would overthrow the whole Ministery of Jesus Christ himself and of his Apostles as well as the ordinary Ministery of the Church And these things are spoken in exposition of this place taken from the meaning and intention of the word Teaching or the Duty itself whose continuance and farther use is denied But yet it may be more clear light into the mind of the Holy Spirit may be attained from a due consideration of what it is that is so to be taught And this is know the Lord. Concerning which two things may be observed 1. That there was a knowledge of God under the Old Testament so revealed as that it was hidden under Types wrapt up in Vails expressed only in Parables and Dark-sayings For it was the mind of God that as unto the clear perception and revelation of it it should lie hid until the Son came from his bosom to declare him to make his name known and to bring life and immortality to light yea some things belonging hereunto though virtually revealed yet were so compassed with darkness in the manner of their Revelation as that the Angels themselves did not clearly and distinctly look into them But that there were some such great and excellent things concerning God and his Will laid up in the Revelation of Moses and the Prophets with their Institutions of Worship they did understand But the best and wisest of them knew also that notwithstanding their best and utmost enquiry they could not comprehend the time nature and state of the things so revealed For it was revealed unto them that not unto themselves but unto us they did minister in their Revelation of those things 1 Pet. 1. 12. And as our Apostle informs us Moses in his Ministery and Institutions gave testimony unto the things which were to be spoken that is clearly afterwards Chap. 3. 5. This secret hidden knowledge of God principally concerned the Incarnation of Christ his mediation and suffering for Sin with the Call of the Gentiles thereon These and such like Mysteries of the Gospel they could never attain the comprehension of But yet they stirred up each other diligently to enquire into them as to what they were capable of attaining saying one to another Know the Lord. But it was little that they could attain unto God having provided some better things for us that they without us should not be made perfect And when that Church ceased to make this the principal part of their Religion namely a diligent enquiry into the hidden knowledge of God in and by the promised Seed with a believing desire and expectation of its full manifestation contenting themselves with the letter of the Word looking on types and shadows as things present and substances they not only lost the glory of their Profession but were hardened into an unbelief of the things signified unto them in their real exhibition Now this kind of teaching by mutual encouragement to look into the vailed things of the Mystery of God in Christ is now to cease at the solemn Introduction of the New Covenant as being rendered useless by the full clear revelation and manifestation of them made in the Gospel They shall no more that is they shall need no more to teach so to teach this knowledge of God for it shall be made plain to the understanding of all Believers And this is that which I judge to be principally intended by the Holy Ghost in this part of the Promise as that which the positive part of it doth so directly answer unto 2. The knowledge of the Lord may be here taken not objectively and doctrinally but subjectively for the renovation of the mind in the saving knowledge of God And this neither is nor can be communicated unto any by external teaching alone in respect whereunto it may be said comparatively to be laid aside as was intimated before We have I hope sufficiently freed the words from the difficulties that seem to attend them so as that we shall not need to refer the accomplishment of this promise unto Heaven with many ancient and modern Expositors nor yet with others to restrain it unto the first Converts in Christianity who were miraculously illuminated much less so to interpret them as to exclude the Ministery of the Church in teaching or any other effectual way thereof Somewhat may be observed of the particular expressions used in them 1. There is in the original Promise the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 amplius no more This is omitted by the Apostle yet so as that it is plainly included in what he expresseth For the word denotes the time and season which was limited unto that kind of teaching which was to cease This season being to expire at the publication of the Gospel the Apostle affirms absolutely then they shall not teach what the Prophet before declared with the limited season now expired they shall do so no more 2. The Prophet expresseth the Subject spoken of indefinitely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A man his neighbour a man his brother that is any man the Apostle by the universal 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 every man which is also reducible unto any one every one that is or may be called to this work or hath occasion or opportunity for it For of this teaching the Rule is Ability and Opportunity He that can do it and hath an opportunity for it 3. That which they taught or intended in that expression Know the Lord is the same with what is promised in the latter part of the Verse where it must be spoken unto Some things according to our method and design may
as the Heart of all Divine service was first formed all other things had a Relation unto it Exod. 25. 10 11. To treat of the Fabrick that is the Materials Dimensions and Fashion of this Ark is not unto our present purpose For these things the Apostle himself here declares as being no season to treat of them particularly This he intends in those words which we shall not now speak of and their mystical signification which he gives afterwards 1. The Name of it is the Ark of the Covenant Sometimes it is called the Ark of the Testimony Exod. 26. 33. Chap. 29. 35. Chap. 40. 3 5. Most commonly the Ark of the Covenant Numb 10. 33. Chap. 14. 44. Deut. 10. 8. c. Sometimes the Ark of God 1 Sam. 3. 3. Sam. 6. 2. c. The Ark of the Testimony it was called because God called the Tables of the Covenant by the name of his Testimony or that which testified his Will unto the People and by the Peoples acceptance of the Termes of it was to be a perpetual witness between God and them Exod. 25. 16. Chap. 31. 18. c. On the same account is it called the Ark of the Covenant namely because of what was contained in it or the Tables of the Covenant which as I have shewed elsewhere were usually called the Covenant itself And so they are called the Tables of Testimony Exod. 31. 18. That is the Covenant which was the Testimony of God And lastly it was called the Ark of God because it was the most eminent Pledge of the especial Presence of God among the People 2. As to the Fabrick of it the Apostle observes in particular that it was on every side overlaid or covered with Gold 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 every way within and without with Plates of beaten Gold This as I said before was the most sacred and glorious Instrument of the Sanctuary Yea the whole Sanctuary as unto its use in the Church of Israel was built for no other end but to be as it were an house and habit ation for this Ark Exod. 26. 33. Chap. 40. 21. Hence Sanctification proceeded unto all the other Parts of it for as Solomon observed the places were holy whereunto the Ark of God came 2 Chron. 8. 11. And of such sacred veneration was it among the People so severe was the Exclusion of all flesh from the sight of it the High Priest only excepted who entered that holy Place once a year and that not without Blood as that the Nations about took it to be the God that the Israelites worshiped 1 Sam. 4. 8. And it were not difficult to evidence that many of the pretended Mysterious ceremonies of Worship that prevailed among the Nations of the World afterwards were invented in compliance with what they had heard concerning the Ark and Worship of God thereby This was the most signal Token Pledge or Symbol of the Presence of God among the People And thence Metonymically it hath sometimes the name of God ascribed unto it as some think and of the Glory of God Psal. 73. 61. And all neglects about it or contempt of it were most severely punished From the Tabernacle it was carried into the Temple built by Solomon where it continued untill the Babylonian Captivity and what became of it afterwards is altogether uncertain God gave this Ark that it might be a Representation of Christ as we shall shew and he took it away to increase the desire and expectation of the Church after him and for him And As it was the Glory of God to hide and cover the mysterious counsels of his Will under the Old Testament whence this Ark was so hidden from the Eyes of all men so under the New Testament it is his Glory to reveal and make them open in Iesus Christ. 2 Cor. 3. 18. 4. In this Ark as it was placed in the Tabernacle the Apostle affirmeth that there were three things 1. The Golden Pot that had Manna When the Manna first fell every one was commanded to gather an Omer for his own eating Exod. 16. 16. Hereon God appointed that a Pot should be provided which should hold an Omer to be filled with Manna to be laid up before the Lord for their generations ver 33. There was it miraculously preserved from Putresaction whereas of it self it would not keep two daies unto an end And it is added that as the Lord commanded Moses so Aaron laid it up before the Testimony to be kept ver 34. But there is a Prolepsis in the words Aaron is said to do what he did afterwards For the Testimony was not yet given nor Aaron yet consecrated unto his Office It is not said in this Place where the making of it is appointed that it is of Gold nor is there any mention of what matter it was made That it was of Gold the Apostle here declares who wrote by Inspiration and the thing is evident it self For it was to be placed in that part of the Sanctuary wherein all the Vessels were either of pure Gold or at least overlaid with it and a Pot of another Nature would have been unsuitable thereunto And it was to be made of that which was most durable as being to be kept for a Memorial throughout all Generations The Reason of the sacred Preservation of this Manna in the most Holy Place was because it was a Type of Christ as himself declares Ioh. 6. 48 49 50 51. 5. The next thing mentioned is Aaron's Rod that budded This Rod originally was that where with Moses fed the sheep of his father-in-Father-in-Law Iethro in the Wilderness which he had in his hand when God called unto him out of the Bush. And thereon God ordained it to be the Token of the putting forth of his Power in the working of Miracles having by a trial confirmed the Faith of Moses concerning it Exod. 4. 17. Hereby it became sacred and when Aaron was called unto the Office of the Priesthood it was delivered unto his keeping For on the budding of it on the trial about the Priesthood it was laid up before the Testimony that is the Ark Numb 17. 10. That same Rod did Moses take from before the Testimony when he was to smite the Rock with it and work a miracle whereof this was consecrated to be the outward sign Numb 20. 8 9 10 11. Hereof the Apostle affirms only that it budded but in the story it is that it brought forth Buds and Bloomed Blossoms and yielded Almonds being originally cut from an Almond Tree Numb 17. 8. But the Apostle mentions what was sufficient unto his Purpose This Rod of Moses belonged unto the Holy Furniture of the Tabernacle because the Spiritual Rock that followed them was to be smitten with the Rod of the Law that it might give out the Waters of Life unto the Church 6. The last thing mentioned is the Tables of the Covenant The two Tables of Stone cut out by Moses and written
on with the finger of God containing the Ten Commandments which were the substance of Gods Covenant with the People This Testimony this Covenant these Tables of Stone with the Moral Law engraven in them were by the express command of God put into the Ark Exod. 25. 16. Chap. 33. 18. Chap. 40. 20. Deut. 10. 5. And there was nothing else in the Ark but these two Tables of Stone with the Law written in them as is expresly affirmed 1 Kings 8. 9. 2 Chron. 5. 10. Wherefore whereas it is said of Aaron's Rod and the Pot of Manna that they were placed before the Testimony Exod. 16. 34. Numb 17. 10. that is the Ark and the Book of the Law was also put into the side of it that is laid beside it Deut. 31. 26. and not only are the Tables of Stone appointed expresly to be put into the Ark but also it is likewise affirmed that there was nothing else in the Ark but these Tables of Stone This Place of the Apostle hath been exceedingly tortured and perplexed by Criticks and all sorts of Expositors with multiplied conjectures Objections and Solutions I know not that the Repetition of them in this place would be of any use Those who have a mind to exercise themselves about them do know where to find them I shall therefore give only that interpretation of the words which for the Substance of it all sober Expositors do at least betake themselves unto The true real positure of these things was after this manner In the closed Ark there was nothing at all but the two Tables of Stone Before it or at the ends of it adjoyning unto it were the Pot of Manna and the miracle-working Rod. Neither of these were of any actual use in the service of God but only were kept as sacred Memorials Unto this end being placed by it they were joyned unto and reckoned with the Ark. This appurtenance of them unto the Ark the Apostle expresseth by the Preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Now this preposition is so frequently used in the Scripture to signify adhesion conjunction approximation Appurtenance of one thing unto another that it is meer Cavilling to assign it any other signification in this place or to restrain it unto inclusion only the things themselves requiring that sense See Job 19. 20. Deut. 6. 7. 1 Sam. 1. 42. Hos. 4. 3. Luke 1. 17. Iosh. 10. 10. Matth. 21. 12. And a Multitude of Instances are gathered by others VER 5. And over it the Cherubims of Glory Shadowing the Mercy-Seat of which things we cannot now speak particularly THE Apostle proceedeth in his Description of the immediate appurtenances of the Ark. He hath declared what was disposed with reference unto it as the Golden Censer what was before it as the Pot of Manna and Aaron's Rod what was within it namely the Tables of the Covenant Now he sheweth what was over it so giving an account of its whole Furniture and all that any way belonged unto it Two things he adds namely 1. The Cherubims 2. The Mercy-Seat And first he describes the Cherubims 1. By their positure they were over the Ark. 2. By their Title Cherubims of Glory 3. Their use they Shadowed the Mercy-Seat The Making Form Fashion and Use of these Cherubims is declared Exod. 25. The signification of the Name and their original shape or form any farther then that they were alata animata winged Creatures are not certainly known Most as unto the Derivation of the Name follow Kimchi who affirms the Letter Caph to be servile and a note of Similitude and the word to signify a Youth or a Child Such these Images are thought to represent only they had Wings instead of Arms as we now usually paint Angels for their Bodies Sides and Feet are mentioned in other places Isa. 6. 2. Ezek. 1. 5 6 7. where they are expresly said to have the Shape of a man Wherefore both as they were first framed for the Tabernacle and afterwards for the Temple when their Dimensions were exceedingly enlarged they were of humane shape only with wings to denote the Angelical Nature They were two of them one at each end of the Ark or Mercy-Seat Their faces were turned inwards one towards another so as that their wings touched one another This Posture gave unto the whole work of the Ark Mercy-Seat and Cherubims the form of a Seat which represented the Throne of God From thence he spake whence the whole was called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Oracle As unto their place and posture they were over the Ark. For these Cherubims had feet whereon they stood 2 Chron. 3. 13. And these feet were joyned in one continued beaten work unto the ends of the Mercy-Seat which was upon the Ark Wherefore they were wholly over it or above it as the Apostle here speaks 2. As unto the Apellation whereby he describes them it is Cherubims of Glory That is say Expositors generally 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Glorious Cherubims If so this term is not given them from the matter whereof they were made Those indeed in the Tabernacle were of beaten Gold being but of a small measure or proportion Exod. 25. 18. Those in the Temple of Solomon were made of the wood of the Olive Tree only overlaid with Gold For they were very large extending their wings unto the whole breadth of the Oracle which was twenty Cubits 1 King 6. 23. 2 Chron. 3. 10. But such was the matter of other utensils also as the Candlesticks which yet are not called the Candlesticks of Glory Nor are they so called from their shape and fashion For this as I have shewed most probably was humane shape with wings wherein there was nothing peculiarly glorious But they are so called from their posture and use For stretching out their wings on high and looking inwards with an appearance of veneration and so compassing the Mercy-Seat with their wings all but the forepart of it they made a Representation of a Glorious Seat or Throne wherein the Majestatical Presence of God did sit and reside And from between these Cherubims above the Mercy-Seat it was that God spake unto Moses and gave out his Oracles Exod. 25. 22. As a man on a Throne speaks above the place where he sits and rests Hence may they be called the Glorious Cherubims But I must add that by glory here the Majestatical Presence of God himself is intended The Cherubims that represented the glorious Presence of God himself as he dwelt among the People So the Apostle reckoning up the Priviledges of the Hebrews Rom. 9. 4. affirms that unto them appertained the Adoption and the Glory And therein not the Ark is intended although it may be that is sometimes called the Glory or signified under that name as 1 Sam. 4. 21 22. Psal. 26. 8. But it is God himself in his peculiar Residence among the People that is in the Representation of
that they should do Psal. 56. 5 6. Some of them affirmed him to have said I am able to destroy the Temple of God and to build it in three days Mat. 26. 61. Which was apparently false as is evident in comparing his words with theirs Wherefore others of them observing that the Witness was not yet home unto their purpose and the design of the Priests they sware positively that he said I will destroy this Temple made with hands and in three days I will build another made without hands Mark 14. 58. For they are not the words of the same persons variously reported by the Evangelist For these in Mark are other Witnesses which agreed not with what was sworn before as he observes ver 59. But neither so did their Witness agree together However they fix on a Notion that was passant among them of a Temple to be built without hands And sundry things there are in the Prophets which lead them into an apprehension that God would dwell among men in a Temple or Tabernacle that should not be made with hands And all their Predictions were accomplished when the eternal Word by the assumption of our nature fixed his Tabernacle among us John 1. 14. This is that which the Apostle intimates Whereas Solomon openly affirms that the Habitation of God could not be in the Temple that he had built because it was made with hands and it is a principle of natural light that he who made the world and all things contained therein could not dwell in such a Temple and whereas it seems to have belonged unto the Faith of the Church of old that there should be a Temple wherein God would dwell that was to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in comparing the Humane Nature of Christ with the Old Tabernacle he affirms in the first place that it was not made with hands Respect also is had herein unto the framing of the Fabric of the Old Tabernacle by Bezaliel For although the pattern of it was shewn unto Moses in the Mount from Heaven yet the actual framing and erection of it was by the hands of Workmen skilful to work in all kind of earthly materials Exod. 32. 3 4 5 6. Chap. 36. 1. And although by reason of the wisdom cunning and skill which they had received in an extraordinary way they framed made and reared a Tabernacle most artificial and beautiful yet when all was done it was but the work of mens hands But the Constitution and Production of the Humane Nature of Christ was an immediate effect of the Wisdom and Power of God himself Luke 1. 36. Nothing of Humane Wisdom or Contrivance nothing of the Skill or Power of Man had the least influence into or concurrence in the provision of this glorious Tabernacle wherein the work of the Redemption of the Church was effected The Body of Christ indeed was made of a Woman of the substance of the blessed Virgin but she was purely passive therein and concurrent in no efficiency either Moral or Physical thereunto It was the contrivance of Divine Wisdom and the effect of Divine Power alone 2dly The Apostle adds as a farther dissimilitude unto the other Tabernacle that is not of this Building Expositors generally take these words to be meerly exegetical of the former not made with hands that is not of this Building To me there seems to be an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in them It is so not made with hands like unto that Tabernacle as that it is not of the order of any other created thing not of the same make and constitution with any thing else in the whole Creation here below For although the substance of his Humane Nature were of the same kind with ours yet the Production of it in the World was such an Act of Divine Power as excels all other Divine Operations whatever Wherefore God speaking of it saith The Lord hath created a new thing in the earth A woman shall compass a man Jer. 31. 22. or conceive him without natural Generation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is the word whereby the creation of all things is Constantly expressed in the new Testament and sometimes it signifies the things that are created Neither is it ever used or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whence it is derived to signifie the constitution of the Ordinances of the old Testament the Tabernacle the Temple or any thing belonging thereunto Wherefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here doth not limit it unto that constitution so as that not of this Building should be not made with hands as that Tabernacle was It is therefore not of the order of created things here below either such as were immediately created at the beginning or educed out of them by a creating Act or Power For although it was so as unto its substance yet in its constitution and production it was an effect of the divine power above the whole order of this Creation or things created God is so far from being obliged unto any means for the effecting of the Holy Counsels of his Will as that he can when he pleaseth exceed the whole order and course of the first creation of all things and his providence in the rule thereof VER XII FRom the comparison between the Tabernacle of old and that of the High Priest of the new Covenant there is a procedure in this verse unto another between his Sacerdotal actings and those of the High Priest under the Law And whereas in the description of the Tabernacle and its especial services the Apostle had insisted in a peculiar manner on the entrance of the High Priest every year into the most Holy Place which was the most solemn and most mystical part of the Tabernacle-service in the first Place he gives an account of what answered thereunto in the Sacerdotal Administrations of Christ and how much on all accounts both of the Sacrifice in the vertue whereof he entred into the most Holy Place and of the Place itself whereinto he entred and of the Time when it did in Glory and Efficacy excel that service of the High Priest under the Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 By the blood of his own Soul or Life He made his soul an offering for sin Isa. 5. 3. Blood is the Life of the Sacrifice 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one time not many times not once every year as they did under the Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 into the House of the Sanctuary less properly for by that expression the old Tabernacle is intended but the Apostle respects Heaven itself in Sancta Sancta Sanctorum Sacrarium That which answers unto the most Holy Place in the Tabernacle where was the Throne of God the Ark and Mercy-seat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vul. aeterna Redemptione inventa aeternam Redemptionem nactus aeterna Redemptione acquisita most properly and according unto the use
so 1 From Gods Institution he appointed it so to be as is express in the words of Moses 2 From an Implication of the Interest of both Parties in the blood of the Sacrifice God unto whom it was offered and the People on whom it was sprinkled For it being the blood of Beasts that were slain in this use of it each Party as it were engaged their lives unto the Observation and Performance of what was respectively undertaken by them 3 Typically in that it represented the blood of Christ and fore-signified the Necessity of it unto the confirmation of the New Covenant See Zech. 9. 11. Matth. 26. 28. Luk. 22. 20. 1 Cor. 11. 15. So was it the blood of the Covenant in that it was a sign between God and the People of their mutual consent unto it and their taking on themselves the Performance of the Terms of it on the one side and the other The Condescension of God in making a Covenant with men especially in the ways of the Confirmation of it is a blessed Object of all holy Admiration For 1 The infinite Distance and disproportion that is between him and us both in Nature and State or Condition 2 The Ends of this Covenant which are all unto our Eternal Advantage he standing in no need of us or our Obedience 3 The Obligation that he takes upon himself unto the Performance of the Terms of it whereas he might righteously deal with us in a way of meer Soveraignity 4 The Nature of the Assurance he gives us thereof by the blood of the Sacrifice confirmed with his Oath Do all set forth the ineffable Glory of this Condescension And this will at length be made manifest in the Eternal Blessedness of them by whom this Covenant is Embraced and the Eternal Misery of them by whom it is Refused The Apostle having given this full Confirmation unto his principal Assertion he adds for the Illustration of it the use and efficacy of blood that is the blood of Sacrifices unto Purification and Attonement VER XXI XXII Moreover he sprinkled with Blood both the Tabernacle and all the Vessels of the Ministry And almost all things are by the Law purged with Blood and without shedding of Blood is no Remission The manner of the Introduction of this Observation ver 21. by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and in like manner do manifest that this is not a continuation of the former Instance in that which belongs thereunto but that there is a Proceed unto another Argument to evince the farther use of the sprinkling of blood unto Purification and Attonement under the Old Testament For the Design of the Apostle is not only to prove the Necessity of the Blood of Christ in Sacrifice but also the Efficacy of it in the taking away of Sins Wherefore he shews that as the Covenant it self was dedicated with blood which proves the Necessity of the blood of Christ unto the confirmation of the New Covenant so all the ways and means of Solemn Worship were purged and purified by the same means which demonstrates its Efficacy I will not absolutely oppose the usual Interpretation of these words namely that at the Erection of the Tabernacle and the Dedication of it with all its Vessels and Utensils there was a Sprinkling with Blood though not expresly mentioned by Moses for he only declares the Unction of them with the Holy Oyl Exod. 40. 9 10 11. For as unto the Garments of Aaron and his Sons which belonged unto the Service of the Tabernacle and were laid up in the holy places it is expresly declared that they were sprinkled with Blood Exod. 29. 21. And of the Altar that it was Sprinkled when it was Anointed though it be not said wherewith And Josephus who was himself a Priest affirms that all the things belonging unto the Sanctuary were dedicated with the sprinkling of the blood of the Sacrifices which things are usually pleaded for this Interpretation I shall not as I said absolutely reject it yet because it is Evident that the Apostle makes a Progress in these words from the Necessity of the Dedication of the Covenant with blood unto the use and efficacy of the Sprinkling of blood in all holy Administrations that they might be accepted with God I choose rather to referre the words unto that solemn sprinkling of the Tabernacle and all the Vessels of it by the High Priest with blood of the Expiatory Sacrifice which was made annually on the day of Attonement This the Introduction of these words by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth declare As the Covenant was dedicated with the sprinkling of blood so in like manner afterwards the Tabernacle and all the Vessels of it were sprinkled with blood unto their sacred use All the Difficulty in this Interpretation is that Moses is said to do it But that which we intend was done by Aaron and his Successors But this is no way to be compared with that of applying it unto the Dedication of the Tabernacle wherein there was no mention made of blood or its sprinkling but of anointing only Wherefore Moses is said to do what he appointed to be done what the Law required which was given by him So Moses is frequently used for the Law given by him Act. 15. 21. For Moses of old time hath in every City them that preach him being read in the Synagogues every Sabbath-day that is the Law Moses then sprinkled the Tabernacle in that by an everlasting Ordinance he appointed that it should be done And the words following ver 22. declare that the Apostle speaks not of Dedication but of Expiation and Purification This Sprinkling therefore of the Tabernacle and its Vessels was that which was done annually on the Day of Attonement Levit. 16. 14 16 18. For therein as the Apostle speaks both the Tabernacle and all the Vessels of the Ministry were sprinkled with blood as the Ark the Mercy-seat and the Altar of Incense And the End of it was to purge them because of the Uncleannesses of the People which is that the Apostle intends And that which we are taught herein is that I. In all things wherein we have to do with God whereby we approach unto him it is the blood of Christ and the Application of it unto our Consciences that gives us a gracious Acceptance with him Without this all is unclean and defiled II. Even Holy things and Institutions that are in themselves clean and unpolluted are relatively defiled by the unholiness of them that use them defiled unto them So was the Tabernacle because of the uncleannesses of the People among whom it was For unto the unclean all things are unclean From this whole Discourse the Apostle makes an Inference which he afterwards applies at large unto his present Purpose VER XXII And almost all things are by the Law purged with blood And without shedding of Blood is no Remission There are two Parts of this Verse or there is a