will not claim nor enter into the said land in bar that he entred not nor claimed the Plaintiff replies that he claims he ought to say how viz. That he came to the Land and claimed and entred So in 5. E. 4 6. in Replication the Plaintiff ought to shew how he is next of bloud to the Woman ravished with consent to the ravishment So for Mortmain how he is Ld. So for receipt how he came to the reversion by special conveyance to the things which the Statutes give by general words as here Titles alwaies ought to be certain because he that makes Title is by this an Actor and an Actor ought to plead certainly by Hales fol. 51. b. If a Wife which hath a Joyncture by her Husband suffers a faint recovery contrary to 11. H. 7. if the Daughter enter the Son born after shall not out her during the life of the Wife By Montogue he may enter presently and save because the Statute saith he shall enjoy it according to his Title therein and the Title is Tail which is devolved to the Son and after f. 1â—… But the Daughter because prima de sanguine â—…ring because the Wife assents to the Ravisher shall hold against the Son born afterwards and there it is Fee-simple In 5. E. 4.6 So 9. H. 7.25 the Daughter shall hold the Remainder appointed to the right Heirs against a Son born afterwards because it is vested in the Daughter as a purchaser because it is Fee-simple to which the Son afterwards born hath not right for the Land was never in any of his Ancestors before Et possessio fratris de feodo simplici facit c. of Fee-Tail not but it discends to the youngest Son of the half bloud So a Bastard eign-abate in Fee-simple Land and dies without interruption and his issue enter he shall hold against the Mulier puisne 39. E. 3.38 Of Land entailed it is otherwise so it is a great difference between Fee-simple and Fee-Tail and according to the Proverb One shall beat the Bush and another shall have the Bird. As 9. H. 7.24 and 25. A man hath Lands by the Mother and aliens upon Condition and dies without issue the Heir of the part of the Father enters for the Condition broken the Heir on the part of the Mother outs him 14. H. 8.18 by Portman if a Remainder in Tail be once executed the issue in formedon shall declare upon the Gift immediately for all passes at one time and upon one Livery But in 20. Ass Ph. ultima it was shewed of a Reversion after Seisen or making Title by grant of the Reversion he which makes Title is alwaies Actor and ought to plead certainly So 2. H. 6.14 A Patentee sheweth his Letters Patents if he maketh Title by them Words alwaies if they are ambiguous and obscure in Statutes have been expounded according to the intent of the makers as W. 2. cap. 3. speaks when a man amiserit per defaltam is expounded when the Husband and Wife lose by default because the Law alwaies was that the Wife may enter if the Husband alone lose by default So W. 2. cap. 1. Et si finis super hujusmodi tenementa imposterum levetur ipse in re sit nullus The Words seem to make a Fine void but yet it is not void but is a discontinuance and void as to bar the right of Tail So the Statute of Gloucester cap. 3. saith Whereof no Fine is levied intends by husband and Wife for they may well levy the marriages of Women and their Estates and advancement by this are greatly favoured in our Law for 14. H. 8.7 The Wife shall recover her Land given causa matrimonii praelocuti if the Feoffee will not marry her So shall have all Free-hold after Divorce So a Wife shall have a Cui ante divortium to recover the land lost by the Husband and Wife by default before the Divorce So 11. H. 7. intends to punish women if they will recompence this favor of the Law with wrong to the disinherison of Heirs here the Wife hath an Estate in the use and by his inhereditament and the Land and Use also is the inheritance of the Husband and therefore within the words of the Statute because an Use is an Hereditament For 5. E. 4.7 possessio fratris of an Use good for the Sister also if she hath the value of 40. s. in Use 15. H. 7.13.5 E. 4 7. and by Litl 108. he shall be sworn in Assizes by the Common Law and Statute of Pernors of Profits and other Statutes have admitted an Use for an Hereditament and the Land and use also is the inheritance of the Husband for an inheritance is such an Estate as the Heir may inherit as he may here and every Fee and Tail by purchase or discent is inheritance by Littleton and Britton contains many errors As to the Case of cui in vita in 7. H. 4. before fol. 47. by those of the Chancery and also by the Register Original 232. is the one the other quam clamat esse jus hereditat c. The Feoffees here were seised to the use of the husband and every of them hath an entire Use for between Husband and Wife are no moieties and after the execution of the possession to the Use By 27. H. 8. The Parliament made the Conveyance of the Land from one to another and the Feoffees are Donors for when a Gift is made by Parliament every one by it is privy and assents to it yet the thing shall pass from him which hath most right and most Authority to give it As in 21. H. 7.32 He to whose Use and the Feoffee joyn in a Feoffment it shall be said the Feoffment of the Feoffee for they have most Authority for to give this So Tenant for Life and he in a Reversion joyns in a Feoffment it shall be adjudged the Livery of the Tenant for Life So if one seised in Fee and another which hath nothing joyns in a Feoffment it shall be said the Feoffment of him which hath right and the confirmation of the other So here it shall be said the Gift by Parliament of the Feoffees and the assent and confirmation of all others For if any other shall be adjudged the Donor the Parliament should do wrong to the Feoffees in taking the thing from them And an Act of Parliament will not prejudice any man as 19. H. 6.62 the Rector of Edington had an exemption from Tythes by the Kings Grant he afterwards agrees to the Act which granted Tythes to the King and so was one of the Grantors yet shall not take benefit by this but shall be discharged For the Common Law saith That none shall be damnified by such general Act made by the Parliament and therefore W. 2. cap. 1. Gifts upon Condition shall not take away right Pattent in London but that remains to this day with protestation to sue in the nature of a Formedon in
and the Son and within his Charge So Litl fol. 4. the Donor shall pay Rent untill four degrees past upon a gift in Free-marriage upon another gift not because the Daughter advanced and the husband from thence forth undertakes to find his wife all necessaries I promise 20. l. to one if he marries my Daughter he shall have Debt for it in our Law because the Daughter is advanced and so consideration proceeding from Nature is a sufficient Consideration in our Law 22. E. 3. ass pl. 70. Fitz. nat br fol. 44. a. and 120. r. Doctor and Student 105. And so the Consideration here of A.B. for provision for his issues males good is a good Consideration to change the use of the land Second Consideration For the continuance of the Land in the name of the Baintons good to raise an Use and Males continue their Sir names and Females change them by marriage and the Male is most Soveraign 40. E. 3.37 2. H. 4.1 27 H. 6.8 and the Female and all inheritance is subject to the will of another 17. E. 4.5 I promise 10. l. to a laborer for to repair a high way or to a Surgeon for to cure such a man he shall have an action of Debt because it is Charity Doctor and Student 105. Third Consideration The good will and fraternal love wich he hath to his bloud and his brothers which is the nearest degree of bloud after Parents and issues good considerations here and so it seems by the better opinion in 20. H. 7.10 but is not there adjudged and they that joyn in bloud by nature joyn in love and therefore if the youngest enter after the death of the Father the elder shall have no action against him conrrary to 21. H 6.15 by Portington because the Law intends that he entred as a friend to preserve the inheritance in his absence because so near in bloud the Law intends as near in love So Littl f. 93. and 40. E. 3.24 no discent of the Puisne or any of his issues shall take away the entry of the eldest for the cause aforesaid So Litl f. 160. Warranty Collateral Bars without assets because the Law presumes that he will advance him as much as he hath prejudiced him by the Warranty So no battail between Brothers or Cosens in a Writ of right But a Nuper obiit lieth against Brothers and Sisters in Gavel-kind where their ancestor died seized or a Wriâ— De rationabili part against him which enters into all which Writs are to try bloud onely So a Juror is Brother or Cosen to one party a good challeng in every action for the affection which the Law presumes the one hath towards the other 21. E. 4.33 And Bromley said That 11. H. 4.12 by Tirwit and Cascoigne by the ancient usage all the bloud of him which was Murthered should draw the Felon found guilty in an appeal of Murther by a long corde to execution for the loss which all the bloud had by the Murther of one of them and for the revengement of his death and love that they had to him that was killed Fourth Consideration Consideration was the Marrige had between Edward Bainton and Agnes his wife Remainder upon Natural Consideration shall preserve the particular estate made without Consideration which precedes it but not on the contrary if the estate upon natural Consideration precede the other estate as A. Convenants with B. in Consideration that B. will marrie his Daughter to stand seized at the time of the Marriage to the use of himself for life after to the use of I. in Tail afterwards to the use of B. and his wife the Daughter of A. is a good use to I. without consideration for the Marriage is private and several Considerations for the estate of B. and his Wife because the Remainder to I. precedes the estate to B. and his Wife but if the Remainder to I. had been after the estate of B. and his wives the estate there had been void to I. but money might have been given in Consideration of all the estates In Mordants case 21. H. 7.19 No use was raised there because the Covenant was in the future Tense and also incertain and therefore was put to his Writ of Covenant there Good and sufficient Consideration raiseth an Use without Deed so a Deed raises Uses if there be any Consideration for it is made to some effect or otherwise should be void because you shall not have an action of Covenant here because an action of Covenant lieth upon a Covenant only in the preter or future Tense and not in the present Tense 1. Contract or Agreement for Lands or Chattels is by the Law First by Writing Secondly by Words First An agreement by writing without Consideration is not Nudum because a man hath great consideration and deliberation in passing things by Deed and the writing his sealing and delivery of it signifies fully his will is sufficient consideration that Land shall pass as his will is and shall bind the party without thinking what cause he hath to do it Secondly an Agreement by word without consideration is Nudum and binds not because words passes from a man suddenly and without advisement many times as 17 E. 4.4 I promise to give you 20. l. for to make your sale of new it is Nudum pactum if it be by Deed you may have Action of Debt upon this Deed and the Consideration there is not examinable and the cause of the Deed is not inquirable for every Deed imports in it self a Consideration without the will of the party which makes the Deed. So 11 H. 4.33 A Carpenter by word without writing undertakes to make a new house and no consideration for the making of it is Nude if it be by writing it is good So 45. E. 3.24 for that the Plaintiff demanded a Debt upon a contract for marriage money by Deed an action lies at the Common Law because there it becometh a Lay Contract by the Deed in Court Christian if it had been without Deed because the marriage which is the consideration is a thing Spiritual 14. E. 4.6 15. E. 4.32 which books are against the opinion of Thorp in the said case in 22. ass before fol. 35. Nudum pactum est ubi nulla subest causa praeter conventionem sed ubi subest causa fit obligatio parit actionem Information for Mines THe King shall have all the Mines of Gold and Silver in the Lands of his Subjects H. 10. El. in the Excheq by the Prerogative of his Crown and not by the proprieity of the Soil although it be not recited in the Treatise of Prerogative and albeit the Oar thereof in anothers land toucheth others Free-holds and inheritance which is proved by three reasons First for the excellency of the matter which being more excellent is appropriated by the Law to the person most excellent viz. the King So the King hath by the Common Law Whales and
compulsive so that he shall have prejudice if he doth not but is a thing obligable at the will of the Defendant and then his entry is not material but is at pleasure and therefore the not shewing thereof shall not make the Plea vicious Admitting that it be a Condition yet it is subsequent and in Defeasance of his Estate 30. And therefore shall not be shewed by him but by him which shall have benefit by the breaking of it So if a Condition be enlarged which may be good leaveth that out which is material because it is Surplussage Also it hath no Livery for to convey Title nor hath it enabled him any waies to take the benefit of the breach of the Condition if it were broken because he hath Demurred generally upon the Bar in which the Defendant hath not acknowledged any reversion And so it appeareth not by the Record that he is other then a meer stranger And by the Common Law no man shall take benefit of a Condition but such a one as is privy And therefore 38. H. 8.34 Pattentees of the King after 177. Also if it be a Condition during the Term it shall be intended all the Term as a man bound to perform Covenants is bound to perform all and his Feoffees fol. 30. Yet if he be sometimes absent and his Family there it is good because the Law shall have a reasonable Construction in things alwaies If W. dies then the Remainder is a Limitation and appoyntment of the time when the remainder shall vest But admitting that it be a Condition yet a Remainder may depend upon a Condition which every lawfull owner of the land may give to what person or persons and in what manner and at what time he pleaseth if his gift be not against Law or repugnant as 10. E. 3.39 A man makes to his Termor in surety of his Term a Charter of Feoffment upon Condition That if he be disturbed of any part of his Term that then he shall have Fee he was disturbed and afterwards outed and recovers in Assise which proves that the Franck-Tenant passed upon condition express to the Livery be it mediate or immediate it stales not the Remainder because his Livery shall be taken most strongly against him So 27. H. 8.24 Remainder to a stranger if the gift fail for bearing of the standard So in Plessintons case it is held That the estate of Free-hold there could not Commence upon Condition but the cause wherefore was because he had not the Free-hold upon performance of the Condition which was repugnancie So a Remainder upon condition contrary to the Law or impossible is not good because a Condition unlawfull or impossible may not obtain the thing by doing of it So if the Doâ—… aliens then it shall remain is not good because repugnant for when he hath aliened to one it may not remain to another Remainder ought to have estate precedent for that 9. H. 6.24 Lease to a Monk Remainder over void because a Monk hath not capacity and so the estate which precedes the Remainder void Remainder also ought to be of a thing in esse before and therefore a Grant of a rent out of land remainder in Fee void because the rent was not in esse before and the remainder here passeth presently by the Livery upon possibility to be afterwards performed and vests when W. dies and in the mean time rests in abeyance as 15. H. 7.10 Fee Tail passeth upon possibility That a Fem Covert and a married man may inter-marry and in the mean time the Inheritance viz. The Tail shall be in abeyance but holden there That they are seised in Tail presently and concludes that the Remainder is good and the pleading also and so the Plaintiff shall be Barred Plat against the Sheriffes of London ONe Goodlad was in Execution Ludgate upon a recovery in Debt had against him by plaint in the Guild-Hall of London 4 E. 6. In the Excheq and going with a Baston that is to say a Servant of the Gaolers attending upon him into Southwark in the County of Surrey and the Administrator of him which recovered brings his Bill of Debt into the Exchequer against the Sheriffs for the escape and adjudged that he should recover thereupon But no exceptions were taken to the Bill and the reasons of the Judgement were 1. For that the Action lyeth at the Common-Law by 45. E. 3.9 Debt against one Abbot or Prior and also for that That he had not remedy against him which escaped for by the esape he is discharged for ever against the party and the Goaler also and the Officer which suffers the escape is charged contrary to 13. H. 7.1 But the Action lay not by the Common Law by 42. ass 11. 2. Admitting that it lay not by the Common Law yet it lyeth by equity of the Statute of 1. R. 2. c. 12. which gives an Action against the Warden of the Fleet or by the equity of the Statute of Westm 2. c. 11. which gives an Action against the Gaoler which suffers an Accomptant for to escape 3. The defendants have admitted the action good by their Demurrer 4. That it is an escape because he was out of the Jurisdiction and Authority of the Sheriffs and that his Imprisonment is ended the last instant that he was in London and his escape began the first instant that he came into Southwark and so he was never in prison in Southwark for he had no guard there The effect of every suit contains and implies in it selfe 3. things First to shew the verity of the matter to the Judge thereof which is the duty of the party Secondly to have judgement to recover and execution thereupon and this is the duty of the Judge Thirdly the making of execution for to take the Defendants body and detain it in prison and this is the duty of the Officer and because he only hath offended it is reason that he be punished that is That he answer the loss to the Plaintiff for that he hath not any remedy against him which escapes nor the Gaoler never apprehended him because a personal thing once suspended is extinguished and therefore if the Debtee maketh the Debtor and another which surviveth the Debtor his Executors yet the Debt is extinct and the person of either of them discharged Therefore in respect that after the escape the Plaintiff shall not have other execution and so without any remedie against the Defendant in the first suit the Common Law which is Common Reason provides That the Plaintiff shall have an Action of Debt against the Gaoler in whose default the Execution of the Plaintiff or otherwise the Common Law will be defective in this point And therefore by 45. E. 3. 9. Abridged by Fitz. h. in Title Debt 130. which was before the Stat. of R. 2. where a Prior dative and removeable le ts one in Execution in his Guard for dammages recovered in his Court of Py-powder escape P.
Litl fol. 108. before fol. 140. two Tenants in Common grant 20. s. it shall enure as several Grants 34. ass fol. 11. Grants totum piscariam salvo stagno molendini sui yet the piscarie passes not for the stagno shall be excepted and not the piscarie because he hath a Reversion in the Propriety of the land and possession of the Ter-Tenancy The nature of an habendum is to give in large or qualifie Malitiosa juris interpretatio herere in verbis c. the words are but witnesses to the contract reversion includes land by all Brown Justice To the same intent of the Abbot and Covent and of Smith and his wife was to have the land pass as a Lease after the paticular estate ended and not otherwise and from that hour that their intent was to have the word reversion enure that way it seemed to him That the Law would warrant it for the land is included in the reversion for if it was not a man by Granting of a reversion could not have the Land in possession after the particular estate ended And a Feoffment of a Carue habendum the Mannor of D. is good if the Carue maketh the Mannor And if land is parcel of an Office it shall pass by the Grant of the office Much more he said tending to the effect to make the Lease good and so the Plaintiff shall recover Brook Chief Justice to the contrary Estate in lands includes land it self land is a generall word and contains Grantor and reversion particular words containing a Decree where one estate onely intent shall be inclined and ruled by the Law and not otherwise and intent nevertheless in certainty of words as 9. H. 6.35 Renuntiavit communium and not to whom void before fol. 122. 13. E. 3. Husband and Wife Tenants for life grant reversion of the Land that he holdeth by Homage Fealty and Castle gard the Lord grants all Services Castle gard passeth not because he granted not the Castle But in Testaments the intent shall be onely observed and rule the Law because the Teastator had not time by presumption to ordain all things according to the Law In conclusion he agreed that Judgement should be given for the Plaintiff Hill against Grange A Man maketh a Lease for years of a Messuage and an hundred acres of land appertaining to it 3. Mar in Common Pleas in Trespass c. by Deed indented the 6. of August rendring rent yearly payable at our Lady day and Michaelmas or 10 days after with clause of re-entry and after Grants the reversion and the Grantee the last instant of the 10. day after Michaelmas demands the rent and enters for not payment and it was adjudged that the entry was good for these reasons 1. Land may not appertain to a Messuage because both are things corporate simply otherwise of Advowsons waies c. which are things incorporate but things Corporate or Incorporate may pertain or be parcel of a thing compounded as a Mannor Castle Knights Fees Honors Forrests Monasterie Rectorie fol. 170. a. But here the land passes as appurtenant but by the intent and phrase of the parties as they have said usually occupied or let c. 2. The rent shall be paid at the first Feast of M. for otherwise it cannot be annual notwithstanding the other feast be first named 10. E. 3. the Abbot of Osneys case 3. The demand of the rent the last instant is good 4. That the Gantee of a Common person is an Assignee to have benefit of a Condition or Covenant fol. 173. a. and shall not be intended of the Pattentee of the King 5. That the Pattentee of the Heir and Successors of E. 6. shall take benefit of the Condition by equity of the said Stat. and not by the words Things of distinct and several natures the one is not parcel of or appendant to the other as 8. H. 7.1 by Keeble a Warren cannot be pertaining to a Leet nor a Leet to a Hundred nor one Office to another nor land to other land to a thing Compounded they may as a Mannor Knights Fee Honor Monastery Castle and a Village or to words general as are Oxgang a yard land a hide of land which contains land meadow pasture wood c. Messuage is a single word consisting of a thing special and not Compound nor a general word for that 27. H. 6.2 Land not parcel or appendant to a house and by demand of a Messuage in precipe land shall not be recovered and therefore pass not by the Grant of a House by the Serjeants on the part of the Plaintiff 23. H. 8. and 31 H. 3. by Feoffment of a Messuage with the appurtenances Land passes not a Mannor and things made appertaining to it are made by usage and continuance So 2. H. 7.28 land belonging to a Forrest and Warden of the Fleet and the house of the Master of the Rolls and divers farms to the Guardians of the Castle of Colchester and one Office to another as the custos brevium giveth one of the Offices of prothonatories and use and continuance is cause of it A man Leases a Messuage and land rendring rent be ought to demand the rent at the Messuage because most worthy Perk. 166. Meadow appertains to land 3. E. 3. by the Serjeants on the part of the Defendant Norwood against Read Action upon the case upon assumpsit made by the Testator 5. Mar â—…n K. Bench. lieth against the Executors adjudged For that the Testator could not gage his Law otherwise it is where he might gage his Law for the ignorance that the Law imputes of it to Executors and therefore there they ought to Demur but if they plead in Bar which is found against them they have lost the benefit of the Law and take Conusance of it whereof otherwise their ignorance shall excuse them 39. H. 6.19 12. H. 8.11 27. H. 8.23 Woodward against the Lord Darcie IF the Debtor make the Debtee his Executor and leaves him assets to satisfie the debt 5. Mar. Reso by the Judges of both Courts and dies the Debtee may pay himself by way of retainer by the Court 12. H. 4 21. according And in such case the Action is not utterly exstinct by the Administration for that the Law intends that he is satisfied by retainer before and so a thing in Action altered to a thing in possession by Act in Law for satisfaction of the party which hath no other remedy but if he hath not sufficient assets for to satisfie the debt the administration there extinguishes not the Action because that he cannot retain for parcel and have his Action against the Heir for the residue but ought to do the one for the other at his peril Wrotesly against Adams A Lease for 80. years of a Farm Tr i El. in Com. Pleas. Ej. firme the Lessor granted the Reversion of the Farm to a stranger to have and to hold the Farm for 60. years after the
Return of summons of the Exchequer because it concerneth the King himself there So 2. R. 3.4 2. H. 7.7 The Kings Grantee of Amerciaments of his Tenants shall not have the amerciament of his Tenant which holdeth of him and another because it is before other Tenants as well as my Tenant Charters of the King taken according to common intent and other things which have not common intent shall not pass from the King by his Charters And therefore 3. E. 3 the King Grants to an Abbot That he and his Successors shall be quit of repairing of Bridges Cawseys and Walls it discharges not him for repairing of such which he hath been used to repair by prescription as Lord of the Village but it is good otherwise of a Town to which the King hath Granted Murage Pannage or Pontage So 9. H. 6.56 before fol. 243. The Grantee of the King with Warranty shall not have in value without precise words but he may rebutt So 2. H. 7.6 The Grantee of the King of all Fines and Amerciaments in such a County he shall not have Amerciaments if the Sheriff Coroner or other great Officer is Amerced because Royal and a Grant shall enure for common things in intendment So 43. E. 3. ass pl. 15. The King Grants to his eldest Son the Dutchie of Cornwall cum omnibus Wardis Maritagiis c. And one which held of the Dutchie by Knights Service and which held also of one which was in Ward because of Ward by Knights Service dieth his Heir within age the Prince shall not have the Wardship of him but the King because a thing pertaining to the Crown passeth not without special words So the King maketh a County Palatine and giveth to another and Jura Regalia and that Pleas within the County shall be determined there yet he himself shall sue at Westminster his actions arising within the County Palatine as 3. E. 2. For an advowson in the County Palatine of Durham the King brings his Quare impedit in the Common Pleas the Defendant pleaded to the Jurisdiction of the Court and was compelled to answer So an Abbot by the Kings Grant made to him for the amortizing of Land or Tenements may not purchase an Advowson holden of the King in Capite and this case by Wray differs from the case in 41. ass pl. 19. before fol. 332. for there the Charter names the house but names not what Lands by which it cannot be intended that the King was mistaken in the Tenure and therefore it is good there and not for the cause of Ex gratia speciali So 19. E. 3. he might not appropriate an Advowson holden of the King by licence to appropriate So 1. H. 7 23 and 26. A sanctuary for Treason shall not be without speciall Words Ex merâ—… motu c. will not pass other things then the nature of the words contain And therefore the King Grants to a man and his Heirs males excerta scientia c. passeth not inheritance 28. H. 8. A Felon may not wage battail against the King because dangerous for the King Stamford fol. 180 and 182. nor against those of London in an appeal by the Kings Grant 20. E. 3. So if one takes the Kings goods wrongfully the King may seiz his goods until restitution and 8. R 2. if any take Toll of those of the Town of Lynn they may by the Kings Grant take withernam of those another time within their Jurisdiction And so the King conveys not from the Prerogative of his person to the person of another a fortiori he may here where the thing is not but Revenue or profit These words ad humilem Petitionem Comitis deminisheth the force of the Pattent by Catline by Plowden if Gold or Silver will not defray charges the King shall not have it because no mettal without them but because the party shewed it not as our case is the Queen shall have Judgement And this point was not put to the Judges to adjudge because that the Defendant confessed that it contained gold which is intended to be of good value because the best for the King Bret against Rigden A Man seized of 10. acres Soccage Devises all his Lands by writing Tr. 10. El in the Com Pl. Repl. and after purchases 12. acres Soccage and the Devisee dieth the Devisor saith to the Son of the Devisee That he shall be his Heir and have all the Land that his Father should have had if he had survived him and dies Adjudged that he shall not have the 12. acres 1. If the Devisee shall have the Land purchased by the Devisor after the making of his Will Manwood for the Defendant said That it shall be presumed that every one knows the Law in acts indifferent and that the Will is of no effect until the death of the party for ignorance of Law excuses no man and the date and writing of the Will is not effectual but the words of the Will shall be construed as they were spoken at the time of his death And therefore if a man Deviseth a Mannor in Fee a Tenancie escheateth and after the Devisor dieth the Devisee shall have the Tenancy because parcel of the Manor at the death of the Devisor when the Will taketh effect yet when the will made not A woman Deviseth Land and after takes husband which dies the Woman dies the Devise is good because she is discovert when it took effect as she was when she made her will and marriage cannot countermand it which was not of effect in her life Also because it intends no exception for the generality of the words As if she had Devised all her plate and after bought plate and died the Devisee should have all his plate at the time of her death for the ampleness of his words declares his intent to be benificially taken for the Devisee Lovelas and all the Justices for the Plaintiff to the contrary That Land purchased after the making of the Will cannot pass by the words nor intent of the Testator because he had not the 12. acres at the time of the writing and publication of the Testament it is no presumption that afterwards he would have and is as if he had died when he writ and published the Will and therefore cannot have an intent to give it and the death which is the Confirmation of the Will follows the first Acts thereof viz. the writing and publication of it for every Act founded upon discretion consists of 3. parts The first Inception which is writing of the Testament here The Second Progression which is the publishing of the Testament begun The Third is Consummation which is the self same and continues one through all these parts or otherwise the Act is void of discretion And by Lovelas it is proved That the Commencement is to be considered in Wills because if a woman Covert Devise Land by her Will and publish it and her husband dies and after she dies
the Devise shall be void So of an infant which maketh his will publisheth it and dieth at ful age it is not of any effect because death without good Commencement giveth not effect And so the Commencement and the intent of it is to be considered in every act So the Disseisee of two acres in Dale releaseth all his right in all Lands in D. and delivers the release as a scrowle to be delivered the first of May as his Deed the Disseisor before the first of May disseises him of another acre and the release is delivered the 10. of May the right as to the 3. acre shall not pass because the first livery was void to this intent so the consummation of it which is the second livery So I have a Reversion of two acres that I. S. holdeth for life after I purchase the Reversion of another acre which I. S. holdeth for life after I. S. Attourns to B. for all three the third acre passeth not for Attornment passeth not more then was contained in the intent of the first Grant And so here That which is not in the intent at the begining Commencement of the grant shal not be in the intent at the consummation of the same but if he had published his will after he had purchased the new Land there it may be all might pass for by the new publication his intent shall be taken That all that which the words contain at the time of the publication will pass and by him if a man Devise a thing by a name certain as the Mannor of D. or white acre and after purchase the same it shall pass for it shall be taken that he intended to purchase it or otherwise the Will shall be void to all intents 39. H. 6 18. But here when he hath 10. acres and Devises all his Lands they are satisfied in passing of the 10. acres and there is no meaning by the words for the land purchased after the Will because the thing is not named certainly as the Mannor of Dale or White-acre Also he may not Devise the 12. acres because by Dier the Statute 32. and 34. H. 8. cap. 1. and 5. intend that the Devisor shall be seized at the time of the making of the will because it speaks of having Lands which he may Devise and here he hath not those at the time of the Devise Quaere of the case where he Devises by special name and after purchases it because of the word having Second point if the Land vests in the Heir of the Devisor where he dieth in the Life of the Devisor Manwood for the Defendant Because it is more consonant to the will of the Devisor and reason That the effect shall take place and the form perish rather then both should perish together as Devisee for life the Remainder over dies in the life time of the Devisor it is a good Remainder and shall have the immediate possession which is the effect yet the form was for to have by Remainder So if a Dean die or a woman Covert taketh another husband before their Devisor dies yet they are especially named Land shall vest in the new Dean and his Successors and in the woman which is now the wise of another according to the intent because it cannot according to the words and if the intent of a man in Conditions shall be performed as 4. H. 7. by Joy he ought to infeoff the survivor and his heirs onely where the other dieth a fortiori the intent in Wils shall be observed where the words cannot and the effect here is that the Heir shall have the Land and it is the form of the limitation that he shall have it by discent 21. R. 2. Remainder Ecclesiae-Sancti Andreae in Holborn good And Parson shall take because it was comprehended in the Devise although he was not named Lovelas and all the Justices besides Walsh to the contrary For by the death of the Devisee the Devise is countermanded for that the Devisee is not in rerum natura when the Devise took effect and in all gifts be they by Devise or otherwise there ought to be a Donee in esse capable when the thing ought to vest or otherwise the gift is void and the word Heirs limits the estate and not the persons which shall take and enables the Devisee as well to alien as to permit it of Discent for a Discent to the Heir is but a thing subsequent to the estate of Fee-simple first vested in the Devisee and a thing at his pleasure And things of sequel which ensue if the estate had been vested first as are Discent Dower Escheat are not good causes to make things vest in others then those to whom limited And therefore the heir shall not have the land here no more then the woman shall have dower or Lord Escheat if he had died without heir which should be so if it had vested in the Devisee And therefore if a man Devise a Lease or goods to I. S. which dies and afterwards the Devisor dies the Executor of I. S. shall not have them The speaking to the Son of the Devisee That he shall be his heir c. is void for that the Statutes of 32. and 34. H. 8. gives licence and authority to every man to Devise his Lands by his last Will and Testament in writing and those are sufficient in themselves for to make the thing devised pass and not regard words without writing by all the Justices but if he had published the Testament of new the Devisee should have the 12. acres in this case for that it had been as it were a new Testament but not his heirs Delamer against Barnard A Man in 13. H. 8. makes a Feoffment to the use of himself and his wife in special Tail Remainder to the husband in general Tail 10 El in K B â—…r Remainder in Fee to the brother of the husband and after in 26. H 8. The husband maketh a Feoffment to A. which infeoffs the Brother being in Remainder in Fee 2. E. 6. The brother infeoffs the Defendant the Husband dies the heir of the first Feoffee enters to revive the use to the Wife and adjudged lawfull 1. By the Feoffment of the Husband in 26. H. 8. all the estate of the Feoffee to use is drawn out of him and setled in the second Feoffee and by consequence all the uses which were created out of the first Fee-simple are discontinued and shall not be revived untill a re-entry of the Feoffee after the death of the husband and that he may enter then notwithstanding the Feoffment of the Brother 2. The Feoffment of the Brother in Remainder is not warranted by the Statute of 1. R. 3. cap. 5. for that he hath not use in possession nor in esse but only a right which he could not grant neither shall it be executed by the Statute of 27. H. 8. but onely may pass by Livery by way of
Ouster during the coverture because by this he continues all his estate but that part of the State taken from him by the disseisin by the Eiectione Firme And the stranger may have Eiectione Firme for his Moity as two oyntenants for life and to the heires of one of them looses by default the one shall have right and the other a Quod ci deforceat and the Moity of the terme is not suspended for then it shall not survive Parson Patron and Ordinary make a Lease for yeares of Gleeb-land the Parson dyes the Lessee is made Parson and dyes his Executors shall not have the residue of the terme because the terme was extinct by the freehold of the Land which the Parson had in him because both in his owne right and to his owne use yet in severall capacities But by Dier it shall not be extinct because he hath the terme in his owne right and in Capacity of his naturall body and the Inheritance as Parson which is another Capacity But where the Lessor hath the terme of yeares as Executor to the Lessee it is not extinct but the terme when the Lessor dyes shall be revived Bracebridge against Clouse A Man seized in Fee of a Mannor maketh a Lease of forty Acres parcell of the Mannor for forty yeares if the Lessee shall live so long and after by Poll makes a Lease of the sayd forty Acres to J. S. for seventy yeares J. S. grants his terme to the Wife of the Lessor and a stranger the Husband makes a Feoffment in fee by Indenture of the Mannor and moreover grants by it all his other Lands and Tenements in the same Village to the Feoffee and his heires and this Feoffment was to the use of the Feoffor and his heires and dyed his Wife dies the first Lessee for yeares dyed within the forty yeares the stranger entred into the whole forty Acres and upon an Ouster by the heire of the Lessor brought E. Firme And adjudged that he shall recover for his owne moity and shall be barred for the moity of the Wife 1. That the Lease for seventy yeares is good for so many years which are to come of it after the death of the first Lessee yet is without Deed for that the Lessor in respect of his Reversion in fee may contract with another for any estate to be derived out of the Reversion and shall take effect then and not stay untill the forty yeares are extinct be effluction of time for the Condition if he shall live so long is a limitation which determines the estate otherwise it is of a Collaterall Condition for although that the terme be finished by it or by surrender or forfeiture the second terme shall not commence untill the terme be incurred for that hee had not power to contract for the possession during the first terme in respect of any such possibility of the breach of Condition surrender forfeiture c. As upon a Lease for life for the incertainty of the determination of the estate by his death and for the possibility which was at the time of the Contract that the Lease shall be executed before the death of Tenant for life by his surrender forfeiture c. As the Lessor maketh a Lease for life and after maketh a Lease to another for one and twenty yeares to commence presently Tenant for life dyes or surrenders the second Lease shall commence presently But if one make a Lease for forty yeares by word defeasible upon Condition to be performed by the Lessor and incontinently makes a new Lease for forty yeares by word this is void yet the first Lease is avoided by performance of the Condition or is surrendered because there is no possibility that it will be executed in respect of the Collaterall Condition But if the second Lease be by Indenture it is good by Estoppell And if it be by Deed Poll with Attornement the Reversion will passe 2. By the first Lease of forty yeares the forty Acres were severed from the Mannor for a time for that the Lease was executed by entry but the Reversion and Francktenement is parcell of the Mannor but the Lease for seventy yeares not nor may be executed by entry during the first Lease but is executory after this determined then of this Lease for seventy yeares the Lessor hath not any Reversion then this is not severed from the Mannor but continues parcell of it because it is executory and not executed by entry and then when the Lessor maketh a Feoffment of the Mannor the Reversion which depends upon the Lease for forty yeares passe as parcell of the Mannor which Reversion may be parcell of a thing in possession But not contrary discharge the moity of the terme for seventy yeares which is extinct by the Livery that gave the possession otherwise it were if the terme had beene executed at the time of the Livery except the Husband made Livery in this Land leased for the Land is severed by the Lease and here the execution of the possession to the use in an instant shall not revive the terme which was extinct before by the Livery Lessee for yeares before entry hath not possession so that a Release to him before entry is not good but he hath onely an Interest and right which is grantable or forfeitable before entry the Lessor shall not have Rent untill he hath waved the possession or the Lessee enters because presently the Lessor is adjudged occupier 28. H. 8.14 3. The grant of all his Lands and Tenements shall passe the terme because it is his Land for the time and for that hee had not any other Land there or otherwise the words would be void and therefore the opinion of Brook was denyed to be Law 7. E. 6. which is contrary but if he had other Lands there then it may be that the terme will not passe 4. He had Judgement for one Moity and was barred for the other where he demanded the whole which is not good bâ— Plowden but should have been barred for all if exception had been taken to it for that he might have had a better Writ for the Moity Vernon against Manners CHallenge of the Array because the Sheriffe which made it is Cosen to the Tenant in the ninth degree M. 14. 15. El. in the Kings Bench. Adjudged good he can shew how he is Cosen 21. E. 4.75 And notwithstanding the Tenant be seized in right of his Wife to whom the Sheriffe is not inheritable for by reason of Cosenage it shall be intended favourable and although that he cannot inherite the Land demanded yet he may inherite other Land as he ire to the Tenant Smith against Stapleton LEase for life to Husband and Wife P. 15. El. in the Kings Bench. Replevin Remainder in tayle to N. T. their Son a stranger levies a Fine Sur Conusans de droit come ceo que il ad de son done aâ— N.T. the Son which grants and renders the
Land to him for fifty foure yeares rendring Rent hath issue and dyes before any Proclamation made and after the Proclamations passe and after the Husband and Wife dyes Adjudged that the Lease is good against the issue of N. in tayle by reason of the Rent otherwise it were if the Rent had not been reserved First The Lease had not been voyd against N. T. the Father himselfe if he had survived the Husband and Wife if it were by words notwithstanding it be a present contract because it depends upon an estate for life which is uncertaine when it shall determine otherwise it is if the first had been a Lease for yeares which containe certainty there the second Lease shall be voyd for the first terme except that it be by Deed poll with Attournment in which case it shall enure by way of a grant of the Reversion if the party will use it so or by Indenture or Fine which are matters of Estoppell Secondly The Lease is but voidable against the issue because of the Rent which is a recompence otherwise it is of a charge for it shall be voyd by the Remitter and inasmuch as this contingent Lease is not avoided but continues during the Proclamations the Statute of 32. H. 8. maketh this a barr against the issue during the terme Thirdly A Lease by word made by the Husband and Wife is the Lease of the Husband onely and not of the Wife possession without title is sufficient to make an Advowry for dammage feasant protection pleaded for part and Inter alia good by the Rule of the Court A Fine pleaded by way De finalie Concordia facta fuil and not that he levied a Fine and also pleaded that it was acknowledged in the Kings Court without saying in the Common pleas is good and 22. H. 6.13 A Fine is a Record although it be not ingrossed and shall be executed Fourthly How and in what degree this Lease passe at the beginning by the Fine The estate of N. not altered by the Fine of a stranger which had not any right or Estate in the Land but is Estopped for his life to say otherwise but that he receives fee simple by the Fine Leases by word by Deed Poll by Indenture are to be considered how they shall enure As if a Lease be made by words without Deed of Lands by one that hath see simple for one and twenty years to commence presently rendring a rent and after the same day maketh a new Lease by Paroll to another for the same terme or for a lessor terme the second Lease is void although that the first Lessee surrenders or forfeits because at the time of the first Lease he hath not but a Reversion and no interest in him to contract for the possession And he that will by contract make another possessor of the thing ought to be proprietor of the same himself As if one sells a Horse upon condition that the Vendee shall pay him forty shillings at Easter and after he sells the Horse to a stranger and after the first Vendee payes not the forty shillings at Easter and the Vendor reseiseth the Horse the second Vendee shall not have the Horse because the Vendor had him not at the time of the sale the Condition only inables him not to contract for the property and possession which he then had not but if the Lessee for one and twenty years be and the Lessor the same day grant the Reversion by Deed for twenty one years to commence presently it is good with Attournment and he shall have the Reversion during the first Lease and the Rent as incident thereunto because it is another thing then the possession So a Lease by word for years to commence after the first year is good because it is of another thing then the first Lessee had because the second Lessee is to have the possession after the first possession and interest expired A man leases for one and twenty years in possession and presently maks a Lease of it for one and thirty years by word this is good for the last ten years and Executory for it for a Lease for years is Executory and severall for every yeare and day and is as to execution as severall contracts And therefore such contract may be good in part and void in part So if he Leases for 21. years to commence 10. years after and he maketh a Lease for 31. years to commence presently it is good for the first 10. years and void for the last 21. years for that he had contracted before and was certain although that the first Lease were forfeited or surrendred otherwise it is if the first Lease had bin incertain as a Lease for life there the second Lease had bin good after the Tenants life not during his life although he surrendred or forfeited unlesse it had bin by Fine or Indenture because Estoppels if the second Lease for the same years be by Deed Poll there the reversion with the rent pass by Attornment by the demise of the land by the name of Land if the possession cannot as a Reversion upon an Estate for life passeth by bargaine and sale of the land by Deed inrolled and the Grantee may use his Deed as he pleaseth and therefore may use it as a Grant of a Reversion with attornment otherwise it is if it be by word because the Reversion for years cannot be granted by word But if Lessee for years will use a Leas Poll as a present Leas where he hath not attornment the Leas is void although the first surrendred or forfeited as it is if it were by word because a contract by Deed Poll passeth not that which another then injoyes But if the second Lease were by Fine or Indenture and the first surrendred or forfeited it is good for if one leases land to me which he hath not at the time by Fine or Indenture and after purchase it or it desends to him I may enter and occupy by Estoppell and I shall be compelled by Estoppell to pay the Rent because every one is concluded to say but that the land passeth in possession for fourty five yeares by Estoppell and shall be good in estate to have the other yeares because they are not incurred in the life time of the Tenants for life for if the Lease for fourtie five yeares had been by word and the particular Tenant for life had died the Lessee should have it against the Lessor If the estate given by the Fine is defeated the Fine shall be void although the Proclamations passe after for the Fine is the Principall and the Proclamations but accessary to the Fine as Tenants in taile disseised levies a Fine to the disseisor Sur conusans de droit or sur release and dies there the issue if he enters before all the Proclamations are passed is remitted and is not harred for that 32. H. 8. which saith that Fines after Proclamations bars tayle intends of Fines remaining
incorporate Masters and the Indenture is Master And in the Indenture foure are named and their Charter Warrants but two Masters Also the Charter is Masters or Governors and the Indenture Masters and Guardians So it varies in Guardians for Governors and in et for or and the words Craft and mystery are surplusage and therefore void words and do not prejudice the Deed but for the other variance the Deed was adjudged void And therefore the bargainee by his entry is a disseisor 2. The Fine with Proclamations and five yeares barres this Corporation and all other Corporations as Major and Communalty Deane and Chapter Colledges c. Which have absolute Estates in their owne right and their Successors for ever by equity of the Statute of 4. H. 7. Notwithstanding that the Statute speakes onely of Men and their Heires for that this Statute is taken largely for possessions of Lands by the Fine and strictly against the ancient right if they be remisse in their claime for five yeares and the Act ought to remedy all the mischief otherwise it is of Corporations which have not any absolute Estate without others as Bishop Deane Parson Vicar and Prebendary c. But every one of them shall be barred by Nonclaim by five years and every Successor shall have new five years So every Officer who hath Land appertaining to his Office as a Parker Forrester Keeper of a Gaole c. shall be barred of Nonclaime after a Fine levied by his disseisor and five year past after Proclamations his Successor not if he doe not also permit 5. yeares Passe in his time 3. A Corporation cannot be seised to another use but onely a Naturall body because they are not imprisonable to be compelled to perform the confidence and a body Naturall shall not be imprisoned for the offence of their body Corporate which is another body 4. A bargain and sale without words Heires shall give a Fee simple But upon those two Points the Court was not resolved because that the other two made an end of the Case An authority given by a Corporation to enter into Land and claime it to their use and after to make a Lease of it in their name is good fol. 535. b. Paramor against Yardley A Termer devises all his Terme to his Sonne H. 21. El. in the Kingâ— Bench. Trespasse and besides saith that his will and intent was that his Wife should have the Occupation and Profits of the Land during the Minority of his Sonne to the intent that she with the Profits of it shall educate his children and see his Will performed and made his Wife his Executrix and dies the Wife proves the Testament and educates his Infants accordingly after sells the Terme to one to whom the Testator was indebted having then sufficient of the Goods and Chattells of the Testator to pay all his debts besides the said Lease and after she dies the Sonne at his full age enters and his Entry was adjudged lawfull and his grant to the Plaintiffe good 1. Because that the devise to the Wife is good during the Minority of the Sonne and by the exposition of the Court shall be intended to precede the devise to the Sonne in sense and intent and the devise to the Sonne to succeed 540 5â—…1 a. 2. For that the devise of the Profits and Occupation of the Land is a devise of the Land it self for that is the benefit and fruit of the Land otherwise it is of the use of a Chattell personall as of a Looking-glasse Mappe Globe or Booke for there the use is a distinct thing from the property fol. 541. b. and 541. a. 3. For that the Terme shall be executed in the Wife as a Legacy certain untill she disagrees to it because it is more for her benefit and she may not have an occasion against her self as another may otherwise it is of a Legacy certain 1. The Common Law to make the intent of the Parties take effect puts order to words contained in deeds without order as the Releafe of the Disseisor and Disseisee to the Lessâ—e for yeares of the Disseisor shall be first or the Disseisor and after the Disseisee otherwise it wonteth previty between him and the Lessee So Tenant for life Houses for yeares and he and him in Reversion consâ—…mes the Estate of Lessee for yeares habendum in Fee The Law adjudgeth the Estate of the Tenant first to passe for to make previtie upon which Release that of him in the Reversion may enure to enlarge the Estate So a Termor for thirty yeares and his Lessee in Possession for ten yeares by himselfe may not surrender for want of previty And therefore his surrender shall be taken to succeed the other Land is devised to one in Fee after a Rent out of it to another in Fee good So fol. 523. because it shall be taken first devised although it be subsequent in words As the Will repeales the first so the last part of the Will repeales to the first part of the Will which is contrary to it because he had such Intent last As a devise of Land to one in Fee in the premises and in the end of the Will to another in Fee But here is not any such contrariety 2. By grant of the Lease land passeth during the Terme because the Lease contains the Land it selfe and time in it words equivalent to words usuall shall have the sense and force of words usuall as 5. H. 7.1 Licence to enter and occupy Land for one moneth is a Lease and so shall be pleaded So that Land shall return redibit or discend or to a stranger after the death of Tenant for life shall be pleaded as a Remainder So a grant of the nomination of the Advowson is in substence a grant of the Advowson because the profit of it rests in the Nomination So here words of Nomination and Profits of the Lease is as much as the Lease it selfe for the time and not of distinct Profits to take also because the Executor here hath not remedy at the Common Law for the Profits if she be ousted of it and for this Legacy she hath no remedy in the Spirituall Court because she cannot sue her selfe there also the Estate it selfe of the Terme shall be in the Wife because the Sonne shall not have it untill fuâ—l age and then might drown his Profit if she hath but profit to loose 3. Alteration made by Operation of Law where the Party hath not any against whom to bring in his action which is equivalent to a Suite and Execution given to a Stranger as of a Remitter So a Debtor of twenty pound is made Executor he may pay himselfe by way of Retainer and hath property in the debt it selfe presently because he cannot sue himselfe and the Law giveth to him the like advantage as a Suite should be which performes the charge of the thing thereby he claimes the commodity annexed to the charge as to keep
Court of a Steward is a disseisen of his Fee For the doing of matter of labour is a claime of the Commodity for his paines So an Executor which hath a Terme devised to him upon Condition that he pay 10 l. to a Stranger payes the 10 l. this is consent and execution of the Legacy So the educating of the Children here determines her Election that she taketh the Terme as a Legacy and her grant after reproves it not but argues her inconstancy If a Termer be indebted to one in a hundred pounds and maketh his Will and by it devise his Terme to his Sonne and leaves assets to pay the debt the Executor cannot sell the Terme to pay the debt but shall pay it with the assets that he hath in his hands Adjudged because he ought to perform all the Will scilicet Debts and Legacies if there are assets If the Executor disagree in Deed to a Legacy certain this shall be presently in the second Devisee of this bequest of a thing incertain to the Executor as of 20 l. and the Testator oweth 40 l. and dies having Plate Oxen Horses of every of them to the value of 20 l. this is not executed untill 40 l. paid for he may Alien which of them he will and the others have no remedy if there be no more assetts and may pay and carve to himself before any other as it is in 12. H. 4.21 because he is neerest to himself And therefore the Execution of the Terme devised here shall not be hindered by the not payment of the Legacies to others nor Lease given to his Executor ought to be sold and then in Legacies it is reason that Executor shall have preferment A gift to his Executor of all his goods for performance of his Will is no devise and a void gift because the Law giveth them without these words As if a Man devise in Fee his Land to his Son and Heire it is voyd because he shall have it without the devise by discent So for to prescribe for to distrain for Rent service voyd because he may distrain without prescription A devise of Fee tayle to his Heire is good because it is another Estate then he should have by discent So here the Estate devised to the Wife which is but percell of the Estate scilicet during the Nonage of the Heire is good because severed from that which the Law would have given to him and the Clause for educating his Children is not a thing Testamentory nor Legecy to the Children but is an intent annexed to the devise made to the Wife by which she by her entry hath the Estate devised to her as Legatory And the Execution to the Wife is also to the Son because a devise although the Estates are severall and is of the same effect as if her Estate had bin devised to another with the Remainder to her Son and agreement or assent shall not be apportioned as attornment by Tenant for life to the Grantee of the Reversion for life extends to him in Remainder So notice given by Tenant for life to the Lord shall serve to him in Remainder in Fee to compell the Lord to avow upon him after the death of the Tenant for life So Rent accepted by an Infant at full age of his Lessee for yeares hath made good the Remiander over An Intruder cannot gain such Possession against the King upon which he may maintain an Action of Trespasse because the King may punish him 19. E. 4.2 and be shall not be doubly punished but against the Lessee of the King one may gain such Possession that he may punish a Stranger trespassor yet he shall not gain no Estate from the Crowne for the Freehold which irremoveablely rests in the Crowne And the King shall not alleadge Intrusion with a continuando but divers dayes vicibus because he gaineth not any Possession by wrong scilicet by the Intiusion against the King Walsinghams Case H. 15. El. in the Excheq Intrusion TEnant in tayle of the Kings gift maketh a Feoffurent in fee to a stranger and after is attainted of Treason and executed having issue and after this attainder is confirmed by Parliament with severall rights and interests of Strangers And it was adjudged that the Feoffee continuing his estate by the Feoffment after the attainder shall be an Intruder and this Judgement was afterwards affirmed in a Writ of Error brought in the Exchequr Chamber But the contrary was adjudged in the Common Pleas 17. El. between Conway and Moulton that tenant in tayl shall not forfeit any thing First That the Feoffment of tenant in tayl had not discontinued nor devested the estate of fee in Reversion out of the King because it is but a matter in Deed which is tortious otherwise it is of a rightfull matter of Record as a Recovery upon a good title or rightfull matter in Deed as a Remitter or Condition performed As Alienee of tenant in tayle of the gist of a common person infeoffs the King by Deed inrolled which regives to the first tenant in tayle which dyes the issue euters it is a Remitter and therefore the Reversion in fee is devested out of the King and restored to the first doner because a former right matter in Deed and in Law concurr together So Lessee for life to have fee if he doth such an act after the Lessor grants by Deed inrolled the Reversion to the King the Lessee for life performes the Condition which is older then the title of the King this older title matter in Deed and operation in Law thereupon shall take the Reversion out of the King without other Suit or Circumstance because bound with the Condition and the fee simple ought to vest in him at the same instant that he performes the Condition or never But no tortious act as Disseisen Intrusion c. may take the Reversion out of the King Secondly That by the Feoffment he hath not given the fee determinable because he had it not nor an estate for life of the Feoffee but onely an estate for his owne life and so the Reversion in tayle continues in him which shall be forfeit by the Attainder and by consequence the estate of the Feoffee determines by the death of the Feoffor but the Feoffee hath an estate for the life of the Feoffor discendable and his heire shall be a speciall occupant of this estate in base fee simple Thirdly That the King shall have the estate tayle in point of Reverter for that he had the pure fee before and two fees of one thing cannot be together in one person otherwise in severall persons and then the King shall have the Land discharged of the estate tayle and by consequence of all estates charges and incumbrances derived out of it as Leases warranted by the Statute and then the laving in the Statute for a thing before determined is void as of a Lease voidable made by such tenant in tayle which the issue hath made good by the acceptance of the rent and after of the estate tayle Escheated for Treason or is determined for default of issue So that the King hath in point of Reverter there the Release shall be void and he hath nothing by the saving of the Statute Adjudged in Austins Case otherwise it is when the King hath it in point of forfeiture as if the Reversion be to a stranger fol. 559. b. What Livery and Seisen is and the validity of it fol. 554. a. Estate tayle shall not be in abeyance nor any thing which another cannot have for abeyance is onely for the benefit of a stranger because it cannot vest immediately 556. a. 562. a. Estates in fee are three First Pure fee Secondly Fee determinable thirdly Base fee which shall be in one when the pure fee is in another fol. 557. a. An estate tayle shall not be to anothers use fol. 555. a. yet if tenant in tayle bargain and sels the Land by Deed inrolled the Bargainee shall have see executed by the Statute of 27. H. 8. which cannot be except the use shall be raised first out of the estate taile and so the estate tayle shall be to another use fol. 557. b. A Disseisor or Intruder upon the possession of tenant in tayle of the Kings gift gaines not except the estate for life of tenant in tayle and therefore if he dye seised the issue in tayle shall enter upon this discent as I beleeve fol. 558. a. The Father maketh a Lease for life to his Son the Remainder for life to her which shall be his Wife at the time of his death this is a good Remainder and shall be in abeyance untill the Wife be knowne fol. 562. a. Saving in a Statute contrary to the Explanation is voide Puton and Hides Case and Austins Case of a Lease and the Duke of Norfolks Case fol. 564. a. The possession shall be awarded upon a Bill of Intrusion which is but Trespas in its nature 561. a. Tenant in tayle grants his estate there waste is dispunishable during the life of tenant in tayle because it is not but onely a priviledge annexed to it Estates passe to the Grantee and amount to words of dispunishable of waste and not because he hath a greater estate then for the life of tenant in tayle So 42. H. 3.21 waste dispunishable in tenant for life because the Lestor released all his right that he had in the same Land and that he or his heires would not demand any right in the same nor claime nor challenge for the terme of the life of the tenant for that it amounts unto a Lease without impeachmeat of waste fol. 556. A Writ of Error abated by the death of the Lord Chancellour because his Christian name and Sir-name and Keeper of the great Seale were put into the Writ fol. 564. b. FINIS
the patol Demur in cui in vita per nonage of the second vouchee because he was not heir to the husband and so because penal here in savor of him it is restrained to the heir of the husband onely So by W. 2. cap. 11. an accomptant found in arrearages shall be imprisoned by Auditors and saith not when in 27. H. 6 8. In debt for arrearages of accompt it is adjudged That if the Auditors do not commit the accomptant to prison presently after the accompt and therefore the generality of time is restrained to a particularity by the rule of the Common Law in construction of Statutes and also by the intent of the makers for if the scope and end of the matter is satisfied all the matter and intent of the matter is accomplished and the scope of the Statute here was That the King shall have the Subsidie and the agreement here sufficeth for that because it authorizeth the King to weigh Woad by the Collector when he pleaseth and then the King hath Title of Action and so the surety of the King thereby is referred to will Also such agreement hath been allowed upon the same words of former Statutes for Subsidies Also if the Statute had expressed the agreement in certain yet agreement uncertain should have been good here and out of the penalty because the infringing of the words of the Law without the infringing of the intent of the Law for upon some accidents the law priviledges some things done against the words of the Law of the nature of the Law of this Realm and of other Realms and the Law of God viz. First for to avoid greater inconveniencies Secondly for necessity Thirdly by compulsion Fourthly by involuntary ignorance First for the avoiding of greater inconveniencies as 22. ass pl. 6. where a man of non sane memory and in his rage did great hurt and another man and his parents took him bound him and beat him with rods and here it is holden that they might justifie this in avoidance of greater damage being of non sane memory and yet the Law of nature and of the Realm prohibites battery but this particular case for the avoiding of greater mischief hath one exception and special priviledge So 1. H. 6.9 The Lord contrary to the Statute of Marlebridge may lead the Distress from the Land into another County where the Mannor is for it should be prejudicial to the Lord if he should not carry the distress to his Manor Amongst the Romans they had a Law That every one which should scale the walls in the night should be condemned to death and one in the night did scale the walls in the time of War to discry enemies to the Romans and he by the judgement of the Senate was not onely discharged but had a reward therefore so such interpreting of Laws is a tempering of the rigor of the Law Secondly necessitas non habet legem and therefore it is a good excuse in every Law as 38. H. 6.11 Increasing of water excuseth a default in a precipe quod reddat because he could not appear without danger of death yet the Law abhors every default because it is in contempt of the Court So David did eat bread for necessity although prohibited by the Law of God Thirdly compulsion excuses in Law as the avoiding of an obligation made by dares So if the arm of any man is drawn by compulsion and a weapon in his hand kill another this shall not be Felony nor he damnified because he did it by compulsion Fourthly involuntary ignorance doth excuse as 3. H. 7.1 Kell fol. 268. An infant killeth another it is not Felony because he hath not discretion and it shall be imputed to his ignorance which is involuntary by compulsion of nature so no default in him So Fitz. Nat. br 202. b. if one of non sane memory kill another because his ignorance by compulsion viz. the hand of God and such other things done by ignorance because not to be resisted and this involuntary ignorance is cause of the Act and therefore he which kills another by involuntary ignorance As by thâ— fall of a hatchet out of his hand shall have Sanctuary Deut. 19. But ignorance voluntary is not priviledged as if a man killeth another because this ignorance cometh by his own act and folly which he might have resisted and therefore shall not be priviledged because he himself was the cause of such ignorance if any were à fortiori in all the cases together before mentioned shall excuse for the Law is not offended for the said four causes the incertainty of the agreement here and therefore in as much as the Statute saith The Collectors not agreed with and so gives him authority to agree with the Collector and the Defendant hath made a special agreement with him which is an agreement and so within the words of the Statute if seemeth that by the rules of the Common Law used in construction of Statutes is by the intent of the makers and by all reason and equity shall be adjudged a sufficient agreement and warranted by the Statute and therefore demanded judgement against the King and so it was adjudged But all the Judges were of opinion against the King onely Hales and Montague and afterwards the King sent his Privy-Seal Colthirst against Bejushin 23. Trâ—… E. 6 in the Common Pleas. En Trespass the Defendant pleads a Lease for life to H. B. and E. his wife remainder to his son W. for his life si ipse habitaret residens esset in and upon the aforesaid Grange and Farm and if he should dye in the life time of H. and E. then to remain to B. the Defendant for his life if he also would inhabite there during the Term aforesaid and saith That W. did dye in the life of H. and E. and after H. and E. dyed also and the said B. now Defendant entred without shewing in certain when and took averment that he had inhabited there alwaies after his entry and upon this Plea the Plaintiff Demurs and it was adjudged against him for the Defendant 1. For that the averment of his continual residence is surplusage and therefore the incertainty thereof nil refert by Harris Hinde and Montague 2. It is not a condition compulsary but a thing elegible at the discretion of the Defendant by Montague and then his entry is not material but at his pleasure 3. Admitting that it be a condition yet it is subsequent and in defeasance of his Estate and therefore ought not to be shewed by him which shall have benefit thereby the contrary is of a condition precedent 4. For that it is pleaded by way of Bar and being certain to a common intent it sufficeth and it shall be intended that he entred immediately after the Remainder happened but by Hales Justice this common intent ought to be of a vehement presumption and not indifferent 5. That this word if W. dye then
day of the entry for a Bar good to a Common intent is not good because parcel of the Substance is left out and because Durante termino is for all the Term for that the time which is parcel of the Substance of the Bar ought to be shewed as the Obligee infeoffees fee another before M. he must shew in certain what day he did infeoff him So 3. H. 7.3 the Lord which Leaseth within the year entred for Mortmain for otherwise it shall not be intended for to enter within the year if he doth not set it forth but the Bar is good where such things are limited because that by special and not by general intendment they are omitted as a Feoffment in Bar is good to a Common intent yet it may be That the Feoffor was within age or in prison but such special things shall not be intended by the Law but shall be shewed As to the matter there are principally two things upon which Arguments may be made viz. Maxims and Reasons the Mother of all Laws and the Maxims are the Foundations of the Law and Conclusions of Reason and therefore are holden as firm Principles and Authorities of themselves One is a Remainder shal not be limitted except it be to a person capable at the time as to a Monk profest which afterwards is deraigned after this the Tenant for life dies the Lessee for life shal not have the remainder because he was not a person able at the time of the remainder limited to take it so a remainder to him That the particular Tenants shall name and after he nameth one yet the Remainder is void for the cause aforesaid But 32. H. 6. if the remainder is limited to the right Heirs of Jo. S. who is living and he die before the particular Tenant is good because I. S. shall be intended then dead also because by all presumption and intendment of Law I. S. may have an Heir which the Law will appoint in despight and so will be certain and therefore the Remainder good but shall not be good where it stands indifferent if he to whom the Remainder is limited will be a person able or not Another Maxim is That a Remainder may pass out of the Lessor at the time of the Livery for that Richel saith in Litl 162. the Remainder is void for this cause amongst others so here it passeth not by the first Livery because a Condition precedes the Commencement of the Remainder viz. if W. die living the Husband and Wife then the remainder to the Defendant and so passeth not at the first Livery and therefore void Brook Serjeant to the contrary As to the uncertainty of the time of the Entry the Bar shall be intended the better for the Defendant which is That he entred immediately and the Bar sufficeth which is good to a Common intent And therefore about 20. E. 3. it is holden That if one plead in Bar That one I. S. died seised and R. S. entred as Son and Heir to him whose Estate he hath this shall make the Bar good and yet it may be that he was not Heir for it is not expresly said That he is Son and Heir but that he Entred as Son and Heir and yet in as much as it is pleaded by way of Bar the best shall be intended for the Defendant so here And he argued besides much in effect as Cook did Sanders Serjeant for the Defendant The Bar is good to a Common intent and the best shall be intended for him which pleads it for a Plea in Bar is alwaies made for two causes The one to enforce the Plaintiff to make his replication The other is to compel him to joyn Issue which cannot be joyned upon the replication as it may upon the Bar and then the certainty shall be in it and not of necessity in the Bar and therefore the Bar good if it be good to a Common intent As in Assise the Tenant pleads in Bar a discent to the Plaintiff and to two others and that he hath the state of one and it is a good Plea because it is intended lawfully yet he may have it by Disseisen and then he is a Disseisor to the Plaintiff also for he cannot be a Disseisor to one except he be so to the other So 27. ass 31. in an Assise by the Heir the Tenant saith That the Father of the Plaintiff being Tenant by the courtesie and now in life Leased his Estate to his Father which died and he is in as Son and Heir Judgement if Assise and held a good Bar yet he doth not say That he was the first which entred and yet good So 21. H. 6. 17. here fol. 26. as to the Remainder it shall be good because it is a principle that it shall be taken most strongly against him which made it and therefore in 31. H. 8. If a man gives to a man and to Heirs without his it is Fee yet he giveth not Fee expresly So 18. E. 3. 28. after 170. A good Remainder by word That after the Decease of Tenant for Life the Lands shall return to A. and B. in Fee So a Remainder to the right Heirs of I. S. in Life passeth presently and shall be in abeyance rather than void and that if shall be to the benefit of the Lessee against his own Livery and limitation as alwaies the Law interprets words strongest against the Speakers as in 40. E. 3. 5. 49. E. 3. 1. A Termor counts that he left this as good as he found it and the Wind blew down the House it is not waste but Covenant lies for the special Agreement alters the Law and maketh his words to be taken more strongly against him So the Law taketh the Acts aforesaid strongly against the Makers And therefore if I. give to B. Land upon Condition That if he Marry my Daughter he shall have Fee if he Marries her he shall have Fee for by the Livery it taketh Commencement and by the performance of the Condition it taketh perfection and in the mean time it is ambiguous So a Lease for years upon Condition That one moneth after he shall have Fee he shall have it after the moneth accordingly for the thing passes according to the Covenant most strong against the Donor So a Lease to two upon Condition That if the one die within seven years that then after the death of the other it shall remain to a stranger good and Privies and strangers are all one 24. and 32. he differs because he hath an Estate first given to which the Condition may be annexed and Livery and by imitation shall be taken strongest against him which makes it Three things one shall have by Remainder First he shall have a Remainder to vest Secondly a Possession in Law and Thirdly a Possession in Deed if he be capable at the time of the Possession in Law cast upon him it sufficeth 28. against it as 17. E. 3. 29. and
to the first nor cannot pass by the second Lease for that is severed for the time by 38. H. 6. fol. 38. That a thing in possession may not be parcel or appendant to a thing in Reversion as a Lease for life of a Mannor except the services of I. S. it is not parcel of the Mannor But is a signiory in gross and the Land shall be demanded at the common Law and not in the Court of the Lord by Bromely But here quere if the acceptance of the second Lease be a surrender of the first and the severance by the second Lease and then the severance by the exception is determined and so the Mannor passes entire as it was at the commencement 3. If the recitall of one part of the Statute which maketh for him which recites it be sufficent 4. If the pleading of a surrender or grant to the King by deed inrolled generally without shewing of the enrollment specially be good 5. The King is seised Jure Coronae of Lands coming to him by the dissolution of Monasteries the Tenant pleads a Lease for fifty yeers in Bar and after by his rejoynder pleads that the said Lease is made good for twenty one yeers by the Statute of 31. H. 8. this is a departure for that the state cometh after the Lease otherwise it is of a thing pleaded in affirmance of the Bar which precedes it 6. That the second Lease made by an Abbot within the yeer of the making of the Statute of 31. H. 8. to one which hath a Lease for yeers of it before without the reservation of the Ancient Rent then it shall be good for twenty one yeers only from the making of the second Lease per curiam Bromley The Lessee for yeers accepts of a new Lease within one yeer after the making of the Statute of 31. H. 8. cap. 13. Admitting this second Lease to be good by the same Statute yet it is a good surrender of the first Lease for that the second Lease was once good and shall be expounded to be viod by the Statute as to the King and after the Land comes to the Kings hands and not ab initio and so he shall not avoid the operation of the Common Law in the Surrender And by the Common Law the taking of a second Lease is a surrender of the first for both Estates may not be in one and the same person at one and the same time For if the Lessee for fourty yeers taketh a new Lease for twenty yeers upon condition that it shall be void if he doth not such an Act the condition broken avoids the second Lease But not with such relation that it shall take away the Surrender of fourty yeers because it was once executed absolutely So if a recovery is had of Land the which is afterwards reversed by error which avoids the recovery yet it doth not so avoid it that the Recoveror shall be punished by Trespas for the issues taken in the mean time two points upon the Statute here first the second Lease is not so void by the first branch of the Statute so that at the time of the second Lease made the first Lease hath his continuance but was determined and the Statute is in the copulative and then it is not determined by the making of the second Lease which then had his continuance then was not determined finished or expired according to the words of the Statute Secondly the second Lease for fifty yeers is abridged to one and twenty yeers by the second branch for contrary to equity it will destroy the former Lease and the second also And so that the same Lease exceeds not twenty one yeers express in the Statute extends to the terme abridged and not to the intire new term to make the clause conditional but to make the State abridged good for one and twenty yeers and shall be as a double repetition of the first clause only and be also a declaration of the State and expounded in the future tense that it shall not exceed twenty one yeers which is all one with the words for twenty one yeers as in a writ to the Shereist to seiz goods for the King Ita quod nullus adea manum apponat And in the Statute of Gifts conditionall Ita quod non habeat potestatem alienandi The word So is not conditional but maketh a plain declaration of the thing before by the words of the Statute sometimes expounded contrary to the text to make this agree with reason as by 25. E. 3. cap. 16. after fo 205. by the exception of non-tenure of parcel no Writ shall abate but for the quantity of non-tenure which is alledged expounded by 5. H. 7.7 where the thing demanded is severall as Acrâ—s for in a precipe of a Mannor if the Tenant pleads non-Tenure of parcel all the writ shall abate because an intire thing and there the demandant ought to have an exception in the writ because it is contrary to reason that a man shall demand the intire mannor against one which is not Tenant but of parcel of that which he endevors to recover So Praerogativa Regis is for the Tenure of him in Capite where the King shall have Primer seisen of all his other Lands yet 30. H. 8. and after fol. 204. for Soccage in Capite he shall not have because it is contrary to reason that such a small Tenure should be so greatly charged So W. 2. cap. 21. gives entry to the Heir yet he shal not have the arrerages in the life of his father old natura brevium 138. and this exposition is contrary to the text because the text is contrary to reason to give an action to the Heir for a thing in consideration of another thing not due to him So Glouc. cap. 3. for warranty with assets 21. H. 7.10 11. H. 4.21 the things taken by equity is expounded contrary to the principall Perveyance Instans est unum indivisibile in tempore quod non est tempus nec pars temporis ad quod tamen partes temporis copulantur Townsends Case A Woman Tenant in tayle taketh husband who maketh a Feoffment in 20. H. 8. to the use of himself and his wife for their lives the remainder over the wife is not temitted Adjudged 1. For that she cannot avoid the discontinuance by entry as she might after 32. H. 8. cap. 28. but hath an action viz. cui in vita given to her to recontinue the possession which she useth not but cometh to the possession by another mean she ought to take it in such order and with such appendances as the Law limits to such mean the mean which she useth here is 27. H. 8. and as the Statute appoints the possession to her she shall be adjudged in and not otherwise although she be a Fem Covert For Coverture or Infancy is not materiall here for it is not excepted in the Statute And the Statute of 27. H. 8. of
H. 6.25 Of vigor of an appeal pleaded against an excomunication the usuall form shall be observed and good as in debt when the defendant acknowledgeth himself to be bound c. So in forgery against one only quod falsa conspiratione habita good 11. H. 6.2 because the usuall form where a man may not have by common intendment precise notice of the certainty of a thing it sufficeth to alleadge this generally as 21. H. 6.9 9. H. 7.15 that executors have administred to B. without shewing what things good because he may not know that another hath administred and that he is not privy So 5. E. 4.8 Obleige to discharge the Sheriff of all things touching his office he said that he had discharged him generally good because for the infiniteness of it Talbot and Corbets case tempore H. 7. upon the same Statute 23. H. 6. where the issue was joyned that Corbet was chosen Knight for the Parliament and he was admitted to prove it c. So 2. E 4. 19. imprison to make an obligation to the defendant to others unknown without naming them good contrary in false imprisonment So 10. E. 4. 19. bound for to serve in all lawfull commands he said that he had served him lawfully untill such a day without shewing in what good So in 12. H 7.14 he had found him meat drink and apparel untill one and twentd yeers without shewing what good So monstraverunt homines without shewing the number because a great number for the Law compels not to shew the certainty of the thing which is not to be known or remembred Brook Chief Justice so 128. and in Parliament the most voices in the upper house shall be numbred by the Clerk of the house for every one there shall be severally demanded otherwise it is in the house of Commons for there the assent is tryed by voices sounding all at one time So in election of Coroners Sanders so 126. the County of Chester was alwayes parcel of the Realm of England yet Knights and Burgesses came not from thence untill the Statute of 34. 35. H. 8. ca. 13. Statute penall extends not further then the words and namely for to punish others as 21. H. 7.21 of malefactors in Parks extends not to Forrests So 13. H. 6. cap. 10. that Sheriffs shall not let their Counties extends not to him which Leases parcel of it 21. H. 7.36 the contrary was held 20. H. 7.12 and before fol. 87. So treble dammages for a forcible entry in an Assise or trespas extends not to entry in the nature of an Assise 7. H. 4. which limit order for the election of Knights extended not to the false return of the Sheriff untill 11. H. 4. was made if London inlarge the Ancient custome viz that a villen shall not be drawn out which hath remained there a yeer and a day because Ancient demeansne 7 H. 6.32 extends not to enlargment So England altered not the subjecton of Wales Rape is made fellony by W. 2. ca. 34. Abetters inquirable cap. 12. and at one time good 2. E. 2.22 E. 3. yet Chapter the 12. seeme to be intended of fellons before made and not by the same Statute Sanders justice the allegation alledged under the viz. is a plain precise and effectuall affirmation in deed proved by Rules in grammer the authority of Latine Authors by the Register 66.160 natura brevium 63.134 h. 135. b. and the opinion of the Doctors of the Civill Law 21. E. 4.49 and after so 143. by Catlin an Abbot in discharge to be collector saith inter Record of such a term continetum that R. 2. had granted to his predecessors that he nor his successors shall be collectors and naught for it may be contained amongst the Records and yet no Record escuage was first invented to suppress the Welch and Scots rebels against whom war was made by the King of England as against Rebels and not as against enemies for that they were subject to England H. 3. made E. 1. his eldest son Prince of Wales and so it hath continued to this time which Act of H. 3. was the first alteration of Wales King E. 1. made the Statute of Snowdon The third was the Statute of 27. H. 8. the welch may sue by quod ei deforceat in the nature of what action they will Statutes sometimes explaines the Common Law Merton cap. 2. quod vidua legare possunt bluda c. and late Statutes aided by equity Statutes made before so lineal warranty Bars not the issue in taile without assets by the equity of Glocester made long before after fol. 78. so Land delivered in execution by the Statute of Marchants 1â— E. 1. yet it shall be delivered also to so high extendors although 13. E. 1. speaketh not of it by equity of Acton Burnel 11. E. 1. cap. 2. which giveth goods prised at two high prises in dammage and that the Connusee shall have them for the price because it intended to aide things in like degree although not in esse then Brown Justice to the same purpose and said that in things touching Grammer their predecessors have consulted with Grammarians and pursued their Rules as it appeareth in our books that the the Judges have said proximo antecedenti fiet Relatio the which sentence they might take out of Grammar and he argued that licet was a plain affirmative and that the matter contained under the licet is an affirmation with greater vehemency then it should be without the licet and that the licet augments the affirmation And he argued further that the generall words of the Statute of 27. enabled the plantiffe to take benefit of the penalty and in what he said agreed with Sanders in effect Brook chief Justice Gavel kind commenced by the Brittans by partition of England Scotland and Wales between the three sons of Brute continued by Bellinus Brennus Ferrex and Porrex and was altered in England by the conquest of the Saxons and the eldest son by their Law was inheritable But Gavel kind continued in Wales until 27. H. 8. for it was not conquered Priviledges within certain precincts or Dominions followed not the enlargement of the place So 38. H. 6.10 Liberties granted to the Bishop of Durham in feedis suis extends not to the purchase after So 21. H. 6. Warren is granted to B. in all his Lands in Dale and he purchaseth other Land in Dale he shall not have warren there So a grant of Conusans of Pleas of a thing parcel of the mannor of Dale tenancy Escheats afterwards he shall not have of it For the grant taketh execution of his precinct and circuit at the time of the making of it and the services shall be then parcel of the mannor and not the demeans which now escheat So grant wreck to B. in all his Lands it shall not extend to the Land of which he was then disseised because not his but the disseisors pro tempore Reference to another
thing shall be as this to which it is referred it As if a man make a Lease for so many yeers as I. S. hath in the mannor of D. there he shall have so many yeers as I. S. hath and shall take avermen that I. S. had so many issiut tale corodium quale I.S. nuper habuit So 11. H. 4. 20. H. 7. grant office taking such fee as I. S. which executed the same before had ought to be shewed what he had So 20. E. 3. the King granted to Litales liberties that the Town of N. had by shewing of the records or writings prove their liberties the grantee shall have the like Browning against Beeston LEase for yeers by Indenture by which the Lessee Covenants and grants to render and pay for that land 1 Mar in ba. Ray Trespass thirty seven pound yeerly at two feasts of the yeer naming them or within two moneths after at a certain place out of the Land and moreover Covenants grants if the said rent and farm of thirty seven pounds be areare and not paid at the time limited without any demand of the Lessor then the Lease shall be utterly void extinct and of no effect and that it shall be lawful for the lessor to re-enter and after the rent was not paid and before the entry the lessor maketh a new Lease and the first Lessee bringeth trespas against the second Lessee and he pleads the matter aforesaid and pleads the condition in this manner as in the Indenture is contained and saith not precisely that the Lessee had Covenanted as aforesaid And also said that the Rent was arear by the space of two moneths next after the said feast and adjudged for the plantiff for these two causes only 1. That the pleading of the Covenant which is contained in the Indenture that the first Lessee hath covenanted is not but a recitall and no express averment that he hath made such a Covenant in facio fol. 143. by Bromly 2. Because that the pleading of the Rent arear for two moneths varies from the Indenture which is after two moneths fol. 143. b. by all contrary to Catlin for he said that this is to be intended so if necessity Matters in Law are left at large but the better opinion was for the defendant If this Covenant and grant of the Lessee to pay thirty seven pounds yeerly be a reservation of the Rent or not and by Ramsey fol. 132 it is not 1. For that it is not issuing out of the Land by the way of Charge for pro terra implies a cause of the grant and is not words to Charge the Land 2. It is not a Rent service for default of words of reservation of the lessor as reddendum reservandum tenendum c. for this commences by words of the Lessee and which amounts not to a sum in gross because it goeth not with the revertion as he which hath Land on the part of the mother maketh a Lease for yeers by Indenture the Lessee Covenants and grants to pay to him and his heirs twenty shillings Rent the Lessor dies without issue the heir on the part of the mother shall have the revertion and on the part of the father the Rent for that it is a some in gross and not a Rent incedent to the revertion 3. It is not farm because it is not a Rent because they are all one 4. It is a void condition if it be a condition because it refers to the farm and Rent where there is not any such as a condition that the Feoffee shall infeoffe a Corporation which is not or his wife is voide because the first is impossible and the other against Law but the state because it is Precedent in defeasans of which they are made shall stand good Stamford and Walsh Justices fol. 134. It is a Rent first this Covenant and grant is equivalent to reservation and is by Indenture in which the words are the words of both and taken for the words of him which most aptly speaks them as a Rent upon a Feoffment Litl 47. is a grant of the Feoffee and in Judgment of Law shall dispose words which have substance formality and words there shall be taken indifferently For all parties assent and are privy to the speaking of them But words of a deed poll taken more available to the grantee 20. H. 7.8 by Brian and the Law expounds one word in the sence of another as 10. E. 31. 14. H. 8.2 21. E. 3.49 Reverter for Remainder So it taketh a word spoken by one for the word spoken by another and namely by Indenture and although it were not a Rent but a sum in gross yet it extends to it and to issue out of the Land for the Law because it is spetially alleadged the ground of payment of a sum to be for the Land and yeerly to be paid and the one is executory for the other For before fol. 71. if Land recovered by an elder title shall not pay which hath not the thing which ought to pay as 15. E. 4.4 if he may not have the ancient Pale he is excused to make a new so 9. E 4 10. if he will not give counsell the other shall stay the Annuity and 39. Assise 23. Rent for equality of partition charge the Land parted not mentioned because the Rent was granted and executory for the land So 2. H. 7 5. it shall discend to the heirs of the grantee without naming because it cometh in respect of the Land which should discend to the heir and when the ground of the matter appeareth the Law supplies the fault of the words because the Law respects the ground of the matter and consideration Gawdy It is not a rent fol. 136. in 39. H. 6.33 all the words shall be taken the words of one party viz. The first in the Indenture wherefore they are not the words of both because it estops not the other party and an estopple discends upon the Heir of him which is Heir at the Common Law because he is Son by the half venter neither Sister or Brother by the entire bloud and although they agree to have the same yet how viz. as a rent or not is not parcel of their agreement So it shall not be construed a rent because words may have a reasonable construction otherwise in 22. E. 4. in the case of the Prior of Bingham the Covenant was of a rent which shall be intended rent service the Fine saith not predictum redditum but was of five acres and was for the land and the Grantor was Tenant so holden there to be an annuity so here Morgan it is a rent f. 137. b. for the assent of the parties is the chief matter to be considered and not who speaks for the Lessor shall not have debt for the rent reserved unless it be a Contract and it is not a Contract without the assent of all and the words comming out of the mouth of
which ought to pay it 13. E. 4.6 The Title of the King appeareth yet he is not party the Court of Office shall adjudge for him Stamford cap. 29. fol. 96. Fitzh nat br 38. E. 31. 6. H. 7.12 and 11. H. 4.71 by customes the custom of London to retain a pledge cujuscunque fuerit until he pays binds not the King 35. H. 6.35 nonsale in market overt 35. H. 6.28 and Doctor and Student 40. nor Wreck Waise nor Stray binds not the King 35. H. 6.26 27. Custom that all distresses taken within his Mannor shall be impounded there binds not the King 21. E. 3 4. by Statutes which binds not the King where he is not named yet he shall take advantage of them As of the Stat of Waste of 9. R. 2. c. 3. of Error and attaint by him in reversion upon a recovery against Tenant for life And of W. 2. c. 7. fol. 140. If the King as Heir to his mother brings asur cui in vita the Plea shall not be delayed by the Nonage of the Heir the King not named is not restrained by Magna Charta cap. 10. upon which the Ne injuste vexes is founded for to avoid incroachment That if the King incroach more then he ought he hath no other remedy then by Petition The King bringeth a Quare impedit in the Common Pleas good notwithstanding Magna Charta quod communia placita c. 31. E. 3.18 E. 3.22 before fol. 240. Plenarty no Plea against the King 43. E. 3.14 Non obstante W. 2. cap. 5.32 H. 8. cap. 2. Of Limitations binds not the King The King may not suffer a Common Recovery for to Dock the Tail as a common person may because no precipe or Covenant lieth against him 12. H 7.12 by Constable So the King shall be in a worse condition then a subject or common person to bar the issue Anthony Brown Justice The name of King drowns the Sir-name of the King and includes it and his proper name also and this word of substance by it self may not be omitted in purchases Pattents or Writs Land given to Henry the seventh omitting King giveth nothing to him omitting his name of Baptism So a gift by him by these words in the Pattent Rex concessit That the name Politick of the King includes his natural name and when this name is conjoyned to his natural person it altereth the quality and degree of the person natural in the estimation of the Law So if that he be within age he shall be adjudged of full age and his attainder frustrate when he is King that the greater removes the Imperfection of the Lesser before fol. 138. the body politick hath the preheminence of the natural body as Land given to the King by the name of Baptism and of King also as to Henry the King and to his Heirs this shall go in succession as the Crown and if he dieth without issue the Heir of the part of his mother which hath the Crown shall have the Land also because this name King being the greater shall have the greater preheminence in the purchase and shall draw the land with him So that his brother of the half bloud being King shall have it yet here the King shall take in such body and in such estate and condition as the Donor limits and not otherwise So if a Gift had been made before the Statute to the King and the Heirs of his Body he had taken Fee Conditional as another Common person That if he dies without issue the Donor should enter without Office And if the King before the Stat. giveth to one and his Heirs of his body there the King shall not have the Reversion more then a Common person should have and there his Donee might alien after issue because the person of the King shall not rule the estate of the land but on the contrary for to make Remitter right and possession ought to discend to one person simul and semel 19. H. 6.59.58 and 45. before the Statute after Issue the Donee might do all acts of a full Fee because then he had full Fee and inheritance and not before 5 6 7 and 8. E. 3. And the words in the Statute hath given prius facia non extenditur intends not the Donees made by the Donors before the Statute but of alienations made by the Donees before the Statute and lawfully and after issue as a Lease for life and release of Tenant in Tail before the Statute good and barred the issue in Formedon after the Statute because it was not voidable neither before nor after the Act if it was according to the power that the Common Law permitted to them 44. E. 3. But the Statute extends as to Alienations after the Statute where the Gift was before So as to the Alienation before the Statute if it were not lawfull as a woman Tenant in Tail taketh Husband having issue they alien before the Statute the issue shall have a Formedon after the Statute that is a discontinuance to the wife because Covert and when she dies a right discends to the issue but if they have aliened by Fine it is good and bars the issue because there it is duly made in respect that she is examined 4. E. 2.12 H. 4.7 before the Statute the King might not Alien before issue had as a Common person might not because the King could not do wrong and his Prerogative could not alter his estate yet the person of the King might alter the course of the thing as purchase of the King shall discend to the eldest daughter onely but if land discend to the King another or Gavel kind to him and his brother the King shall have but the Moity but this Moity shall discend to his eldest Son onely because the quality of the person may alter the discent not the estate be it Fee or Tail So that the estate shall be in the King as in another before fol. 234. and before issue had the Donee could not alien after issue he might and this mischief and other Acts of the Donee the Common Law permitted to Bar issues and the Donor until remedied by the Statute So the Common Law permits other wrongs as Lessee to make waste So if one Joynt-Tenant takes all the profits of the land the other is without remedy at the Common Law Doctor and Student fol. 32. So if the King kill a man So disinheriting of another as here post prolem is a wrong suffered by the Common Law which otherwise the issue should have had and if the issue had not issue then the Donor before the Statute the Donor had not a Reversion yet the land reverted to him as land escheated to the Lord neither had he a Reversion after the Statute of W. 2. c. 1. Yet no word in the Act divides the Statute but the Construction of the Statute ex consequenti divides the estate for to execute the will of the Donor by the intent of
Sturgeons because they are the most excellent fishes that the sea or water renders So that the Treatise of Praerogativa Regis ca. 11. which saith Rex habebit Balneas Sturgiones is but a Declaration of the Common Law before Secondly for the necessity of defending his people and preserving the Common-wealth against forreign hostility Thirdly for the commodity of his Subjects That they by the Coin made thereof which the King onely may make may have between them mutual Commerce and Traffick because if the subject shall have gold or silver found in his own land he might convert it into Coyn for falsifying or counterfeiting money was Treason at the Common Law and for that cause a woman was burnt 23. ass pl. 2. Also it would be inconvenient That a subject which is proprietor in the land should have it for that he thereby would exceed the King in Treasure which would be perilous to his estate The second proofe was by presidents of three sortes First Commissions Grants and Demises by which the King hath Granted such Mines in others Lands viz. in Annis 32. E. 3.8 R. 2.5 H. 6. 15. E. 4. and primo H. 7. and in some of them the King gave licence to digg in another land without licence of the owner and where some of them saith habita licentia fodiendi which is intended land subject where they give amends for the digging or Assign part to the Lord of the Soil this is of courtesie and clemencie of the Prince and not of necessity Secondly Accounts of the Grantees of such Mines Thirdly Informations and Impleading of them which have disturbed the Grantees or Imported their Oar also the King may punish him which taketh Oar in another mans Soil And so Charters Accounts and Pleas against the takers of Gold and Silver in the Soil of another proves strongly those Mines to belong to the King by his Prerogative for the Records of every Court are the most effectual proofs of Law in matters Treated of in this Court and account lies not against an Executor by any except for the King Litl f. 28. The King may seise the Land of his Debtor which he hath by what means or whosoevers hands it cometh after the cause of the Debt Sir William Candish case in the Exchequer The 3. proofe is upon authorities of Law viz. The book called Exposition of Terms of the Law and the reading of Hescot of Charta Forestae and the Laws of St. Edward the Confessor and William the Conqueror and so those Authorities and the said presidents and the reasons aforesaid for the excellency of the Metal and for the necessity of it and the publique good agreeing in one That the King shall have all Mines and Oars of Gold and Silver in Land is Treasure found Thesauri de terra taken for Gold and Silver in Land is Trea. sure Trove the use and continuance Ratifies this Prerogative by prescription although that it need not be contained in the Treatise of Praerogativa regis for the King the Common Law hath many which are not there recited as Tenant of the King aliens without Licence it was a forfeiture before the Statute of 1. E. 3. cap. 12. 9 E. 3.26 although it be to the preiudice of another Free-holder yet because the Law gives those Mines to the King it giveth to him all necessary means to have it by digging with all incidents thereunto for every Prerogative contains in it self prescription for it is in usage and as prescription and usage will give Title or interest to the King in the Free-hold of another as by Prerogative the King might enter into the woods of another and take Trees for to repair his Castles before the Statute of Magna Charta cap. 22. so he might Afforest another mans woods before the Statute of Forresta cap. 2. So 7. H. 3. he might break a Pond and take the fish for his provision So 27. ass pl. 49. The Lord might not take his Villain yet is his freehold and inheritance in the presence of the King for it is a Protection to him for the time So 13. E. 4.6 The King may distrain for his Rent Charge in all the other Lands of him which ought to pay it So the Prerogative of the King chargeth his other Freehold to the Kings distress The King shal have by his Prerogative Mines of Copper containing Gold or Silver in the Lands of another because they are as a thing entire by the Commixture magis dignum trabit ad se minus dignum as 41. E. 3.32 36. H. 6.26 and 3. H. 7.14 The Heir shall have the Charters with the Box if it be sealed so Carts to which Horses are tyed if it fall upon a man the King shall have all Stamford fol. 20. before 243. because as one thing they altogether occasion his death So the King shall have all the Obligations and Horses where one of the Joynt-Tenants is attainted because a thing entire proves that the King shall have all where Gold or Silver mixt with base mettal by Commissions 7. E. 3. and 17. R. 2. 7. H. 4. 17. H. 6.30 and 31. of H. 6. proved also by accounts for Silver and base Mettal no Mine of Copper void of Gold or Silver no Mine of Tin void of Silver and therefore those of Devon and Cornwal for digging in their Land and in other Land for Tin and to have this to their use derive their power from the Kings of this Realm made unto them and giving them such liberties as by Charter 33 E. 1 confirmed by R. 2. but the power given to them for to digg in anothers Land and to pull down houses of another was restrained by the Statute of 50. E. 3. Darby shire and other places prescribes to take lead of Mines steril which is without Gold or Silver without paying any thing On the part of the Earl against the Queen The thing of the most in value is worthiest where the Quantity of Copper exceeds the Quantity of Gold yet the lesse is the most precious Quantity for Quantity the Gold or Silver ought to be of more value then the charges of separating of it from the base Mettal cometh to otherwise this aliquid nihil est if he hath lost by it Wast of 2. d. is dispunishable because de minimis non curat Lex 9. H. 6.36 38. E. 3.7 by this reservation upon the said Demises it is intended a good quantity of Gold or Silver Also because the information sheweth not what value of Gold or Silver is to defray the charge which is incertain and bad because this is the Declaration of the King Also Commissions are not of great estimation but shew the obedience of Subjects and are made at their requests for whom they are granted and many of the said Commissions and Leases were limited That the Grantee should make to the owners of Lands in Cornwal used for the digging of Tin before the said Charter proves by the words themselves
Extinguishment Also the Statute of 1. R. 3. extends to cestui que use in possession and not in Remainder or Reversion where they are derived out of one entire estate created by Feoffment for although that the uses are several yet the estate is entire which shall not be divided but he may make a Lease for years to commence after the particular estate determined which is Executory and divides not the estate but where the estate and uses also are several as a Lease for life to the use of one for life and the Reversion granted to another for life to the use of anther for life c. There he in Reversion may grant the Reversion by the Statute of 1. R. 3. for that it is in possession by reason of the severaltie of Estates Cestui que use by the Common Law cannot meddle with the Land for if he doth the Feoffee may punish him in Trespass And if the Feoffee will not permit Cestui que use for to receive the profits he hath no remedy but in the Court of Conscience for the land was so fully to the Feoffee by the Common Law as if no use had been of it And by the Statute of 1. R. 3. cap. 5. Cestui que use in possession onely may meddle with the Land for to make Feoffment Lease c. and the Feoffee is onely seized of the whole Fee to the use of Tenant for life or in Tail during his life or the estate Tail 4. H. 7.18 And the Feoffment of Cestui que use or in Tail or for life is warranted by the Statute of 1. R. 3. and pass the Fee until a Re-entry both by the letter and intent of the Statute for if a woman Covert was Cestui que use the husband might make a Feoffment and good during Coverture by the intent of the Law and the Statute which giveth to the husband during Coverture direction of the things of his wife and yet the claim of the Feoffees were not onely to his use but to the use of him and his wife 6. H. 7.3 So two joynt Cestui que uses in Fee the one maketh a Feoffment of the moity of the Land and good and binds the Feoffees yet were not onely seized to the use of him but by the intent of the Statute hath a moity of the Use presently and may give or Lease the moity of the Land where the estates are several and uses also every part granted by the Statute or several uses issuing out of one estate the several possessions of several uses may not divide the estate because there entire yet there Cestui que use in Remainder in Fee may make a Lease for years to Commence when his use shall be executed because then the lessor shall have interest in the possession and the Franck Tenement of the Feoffees shal not be taken away nor their estate will be divided but an estate for life or greater he in Remainder cannot make without the dividing of the estate or taking away of the Free-hold because it passeth presently and is not executory as a Lease for years is if the Feoffees to use makes a Feoffment upon Consideration or not to one which hath notice of the first use otherwise if Cestui que use maketh a Feoffment to such a person upon Consideration with notice or without Consideration and notice there all the first estate out of which all the uses do rise is taken from the Feoffees and a new estate is made by authority of the Statute the which new estate shall be to uses newly expressed or intended and not to the first use but by this all the ancient uses are discontinued the reason seemeth to be before that one use cannot be raised out of another The release of Cestui que use to the Disseisor of his Feoffees good and bars them of entry 14. H. 8.7 and 27. H. 8.29 a Disseisor infeoffs Cestui que use which infeoffs a stranger by this the right of the first feoffees is gone although that no use was in Cestui que use at the time of the Feoffment as if Cestui que use had released to the Disseisor But Plowden saith That the greater doubt will be here if the estate Tail was here determined if the first Feoffee might enter because the right of the use in fee was extinguished by the Feoffment of him in Remainder But here for that the particular estate in use continues which may not be defeated by him in Remainder this is good without doubt by some the entry of the first Feoffee shall gain the Fee-simple by the discharge of the use in Fee to himself for that it was extinct in the possession of the last Feoffee as of a rent which he in remainder had in the land before his feoffment this shall be extinguished in the Land by his Feoffment so of the use and by others the entry of the first Feoffee shall revive the use in Fee-simple to him in Remainder which was the Feoffor for that they could not have this at the time of the Feoffment made because not in esse but was discontinued at this time by Cestui que use in possession in Tail and by Plowden and Bromley he shall revive the use in Fee to the last Feoffee for that this passeth to him by the Livery and the first Feoffee hath nothing in the Land to his own use but onely to the use of the Feoffor And it was not his intent that the first Feoffee should have it to his own use but that the second Feoffee should have it and so by his re-entry he shall revive the use to the last Feoffee by the course of the Common Law for that the last feoffment was by the Common Law and not Warranted by the Statute of 1. R. 3. for the cause aforesaid but this point was left at large and if before R. 3. Cestui a que use disseises the Feoffees and infeoff others upon which the first Feoffees to use enter they shall be seised to the use of the last Feoffees because Cestui que use had given his interest to them and his intent appeareth that they shall have it and the first Feoffees shall not hold to their own use because it is a Collaterall thing annexed to the person touching the Land and not as a Rent issuing out of it And use is but confidence that the Feoffees to use shal do for the Feoffor as he would do if himself was seized and so it is a difference between a use and a Rent which Rent is only by reason of the Land but use also is annexed to the person Stowell against Zouch DIsseissor Levies a Fine with Proclamations the Disseissee dies after three years H. 11. El. in the common Pleas Entry sur Disseiseâ— and within the five years his Heir being within age the five years incur after the Heir commeth of full age and within one year after his full age enters And adjudged that his Entry
is not lawfull but that he shall be barred by the Fine with Proclamations and the five years notwithstanding his Infancy for that the five years are once attached in his Ancestor and then they ought to incur for the pursuit of a Claim within five years is a Condition in Law which shall bind an Infant Those which argued with Stowell for the better intelligence of the Statute of 4. H. 7. ca 24. which gives five years to every stranger and of the reason of making it thought the Fines and their force at the Common Law and the incidents thereof which consists in three points 1. The nature of the Fine and the puissance of it 2. The preservation of the antient right by Claim 3. What persons may make the Claims 1. Fines are as antient as any Court of Record and at the Common Law they bind all strangers but those which have defect which Enters not or Claim within a year by 17. E. 1. So Non-claim after the year and day was peremptory upon a Fine or Recovery in a Writ of Right Executory and not Executed as is a Fine sur Conusans de droit and Render 7. E. 3.335 Because transmutation of Possession gave occasion to a stranger to take notice and to bring his Action or enter within the year and a day after Recovery in Right tryed by Battail or great Assise barred a stranger if he had not defect as Nonage was for the great notice of it because publike and more notorious then in other Actions And a Proclamation shall be made before Judgement upon a Recovery in right by default for to give notice of it And from thence use is derived to make Proclamation in formedon as it is in 7. H 4.19 upon the confessing of the Action Quaere by what Law and so Fines after Recovery in a Writ of Right was of the greatest force 2. But the avoyding of a Fine by one defeats it against all although their Right was bound before by their Nonclaim which sets at large all other Rights above them although they make not claim within the year and day 16. E. 2. As if the Lord defeats a Fine at the Common Law by deceit he restoreth the right to him which Levies the Fine And if the state which passes by the Fine be defeated the right Paramount is restored although it was barred before by Nonclaim As the Feoffee upon condition if an Abator levies a Fine one year passeth the Heir is barred by Nonclaim the Abator enters upon the condition broken the Heir now shall have Mort. d' Auncestor against him and after the Statute of 4. H. 7. an Action brought within fives years shall defeat the Fine against himself and all others having right Paramount although he hath not Judgement and Execution until seven years after Proclamation Claim is defined by Dyer to be a Challenge of the Ownership or Property that he hath not in Possession but is detained from him by wrong There are four Claims for defeating of Fines whereof two are by Record viz. Action Reall and Entry of the Claim at the foot of the Fine two by Acts in the Countrey viz. by Actuall Entry and by Claim and so notwithstanding the Puissance of Fines at the Common Law the Law hath provided those Claims for to preserve the Ancient right 3. Those which are strangers to the Fine and have present right ought to make Claim and shall avail all in Remainder or Reversion their Non-claim binds all in Remainder and Reversion because all of them have but one year by the common Law after the Fine levied And such mischief was a great cause why the Statute of 34. E. 3. ca. 16. which out Nonclaims was made But before this time W. 2. ca. 1. 13. E. 1. hath provided for the Donor and Donee that Nonclaim shall not bind them as it did before 13. E. 1. as it is like But an Infant was not bound at a time certain to make Claim by the Common Law It is proved by Implication of the Statute of W. 2. ca. 1. and 18. E. 1. de modo levandi fines observe in their Exposition because he hath not discretion to consider of his right nor to conceive what Action he shall bring nor when or how to Enter or Claim or to do Acts which require intelligence and in the same degree are Non-sane a man in prison and beyond Sea But a woman Covert was bound to make Claim by the Common Law because she is not mentioned in any of the Acts and hath a Husband which may make Claim for her And therefore Infants and such are at large always and bound to no time for to make their Claim by the Common-Law And if the Father Disseisee dyeth within a year and day after the Fine Levied before the Statute of Nonclaim his Heir within age he need not make Claim because he is not bound where the right discends to him more then he is when he hath a present right when the Fine was levied nor Infant in Remainder or Reversion is not bound by the Nonclaim of the particular Tenant And so howbeit that Fines at the Common Law were of so great force yet the former right was considered and time given for to preserve it and Infants were exempt out for this time And after when Nonclaim was repealed and outed in Fines and to make their Claims and because the Law was unreasonable that those in Remainder or Reversion should be bound by Nonclaim of particular Tenants and the Law of Nonclaim being outed in process of time Fines became too feeble and were in effect but Feoffments of Record whereby the security of Inheritance was taken away which was cause of great Contention between Subjects and therefore the Statute of 4. H. 7. intending to reform three things First to magnifie Fines againe Secondly to preserve the Ancient Right if it be pursued within a certain time Thirdly of not binding of persons of defect nor feme Coverts unless they are also parties to the Fines but favoured those which had defects untill their impediment removed and then gave them time sufficient to pursue their right That which is excepted out of the Act is out of the provision of the Act and there is no Ordinance for it but is so apparantly exempted out of the Act as if no Act had ever been made As a Feoffment of a Mannor except an Acre or of all Lands in Dale except White Acre is voyd for those Acres as if no Feoffment had been made but a saving goes to them touched and not exexmpt The word having in the Statute of Fines 4. H. 7. shall be expounded of them which have right at the time of the Fine Levied and Proclamations made and also of the using of the Action or Claim c. And not only at the time of the Action or Entry The exception goes not but to those before bound The ampleness of the Exception is measured by the ampleness of the
Purview And therefore Stowell if he is bound by the Purview he is afterwards excepted and if he is not bound by the Purview he needs not to be excepted and so he is at large and out of the body of the Act which consists of the Purview and of the Exception Acts of Parliament are positive Laws consisting of Letter and sence which together make the Law And the Common Law is ancient to all positive Laws and this is to be considered to come to the sence of the positive Law viz. to put such sence to the Letter which excludes all mischiefes and inconvenience Those which Levie Fines are Parties their Heirs are Privies because there is privity of blood between them strangers are they which are not Parties to the Fine nor privies And the Fine excludes now Privies by 4. H. 7. before not Parties here and therefore it is no Mystery that the Letter of the Act will extend to them no Laches untill all the time is past Because they have Election to protract time untill the last of the five years or last day so that they within five years pursue intends Heirs also of those of full age for such sence stands best with equity reason which most avoids rigor and mischief Things within the Letter and yet out of the sence and intent of Statutes as 36. E. 3. and 4. H. 7.7 Doctor and Student 148. An Infant named a Disseisor vouched a Record and failed he shall not be imprisoned Notwithstanding W. â— ca. 25. Nor an Infant Baily or Receiver found in arâ—…rage of account shal not be committed to the next Gaol Notwithstanding W. 2. ca. 11. Nor an Infant which is convict of Ravishment of another Ward shal not be imprisoned for the Kings Fine notwithstanding Merton Cap. 6. Not if a woman Infant be Ravished and consent to the Ravisher within twelve years there the Heir shall not enter notstanding R. 2. ca. 6. But Infants are bound by Laches for a Title favoured for the Inheritance as Doctor and Student 148. An Infant shall be bound by Cessavit or Waste because an injury done by his Act and he shall purchase and the Law will presume if he hath policy to get a thing that he hath reason to defend himself So if an Infant Lord enter not for Mortmain within the year or before a Villain hath sold because he had but Title to the thing that it was never in him But Doctor and Student 29. and 27. Assises 32. Laches of Entry upon Discent or Warranty binds not an Infant because they have favour for Inheritance for Waife Stray Wreck or for Goods taken from them and offered to Images or taken by Enemies and not retaken before the Sun sets or sold in a Market Overt or Acts an Infant as Executor 35. E. 3.45 or as King before 213 or for necessity as an Obligation for meat and drink Doctor and Student 104. The Common Law is the foundation of this Act of 4. H. 7. and if the Father dies within a year after the Fine his Heir Infant is at large fol. 372. otherwise the imperfections which may happen sometimes within five years are to be considered as those which are at the time of the Fine or right then And because that the Statute provides for the Infant in the exception and in the Fine it will not be amiss in the middest And if one which hath a future right dies within five years his Heir within age shall have five à fortiori he which hath a present right as here because it is of greater estimation then a future If a stranger to a Fine cometh of Non-sane memory or is in prison the third year after Proclamations made and after the five years cometh of Sane memory or out of prison he shall not be concluded because constrained and acts involuntary but if he or she taketh Husband or go beyond Sea in the third year and after five years is discovert or within the Land he shall be bound because Acts voluntary An Expounder which adheres only to the Letter of the Statute of 4. H. 7. without adding reasonable sence will admit many absurdities as by the Letter of the Statute if an Infant which hath present right is excepted dies within age his Unkle being his Heir and of full age shall be barred So if an Infant by Entry within age avoyd the Fine after full age permit the Conusee to be for five years in possession without Claim he shall be barred by the Letter which saith that he shall take Action or Entry within five years after full age So an Infant being Diseisee in his Mothers belly when the Fine was Levied is not accepted by the Letter of the Act because his age is accounted from the time of his birth by intent of the Act here for every thing which is within the intent of the makers of the Act although that it be not within the Letter and intent also and of those exceptions the Letter binds none to five years after full age which were within age when the Fine was Levied and ingrossed and many years may be between the one and the other yet he that is born after the Fine levied and is within age when it is ingrossed goeth not at large but is bound to five years after full age as well as he which was born an Infant when the Fine was levied and ingrossed And if the Disseisee at full age when the Fine is levied die before the Proclamations his Heir within age then and when all the years pass is bound by the Letter because the Letter excepts him which hath right when the Fine is levied But the intent of the Exception intended to except those which had â—ight and are Infants when the five years commence so it shall be if the Disseisee cometh of Non-sane Memory or in prison before the Proclamations and after five years he cometh to sane-Memory or forth of Prison he shall have five years after this by the intent of the Exception Two Joint-Tenants Disseises the one within age the Disseisor levies a Fine four years passe after the Proclamations he of full age dies the Infant shall have other five years after his full age for all by Bendlos and severall five years shall be for severall Titles As A. disseiseth a woman sole taketh her to wife and have Issue A. is disseised and dies after a Fine levied by the Disseisor and before the Proclamations the Issue being of full age after the Mother dies the fifth year passe the Issue is bound as Heir to his Father because in this respect he hath but five years together But as Heir to the Mother he shall have five years to be accounted from the death of the Father for notwithstanding it is the self-same Land he hath severall rights the one the last as Heir to his Father and th' other the first right as Heir to his Mother And in respect of them hath severall times
the Court her entry is lawfull But the Writ was abated for that it was Coram Justiciariis predictis whereas there were no Justices named before 1. That the Fine and Recovery are such acts bargaines and incumbrances which make a forfeiture 2. The penaltie here inflicted for the forfeiture is a limitation which determines the estate Ipso facto without making any discondtinuance thereof by the Alienation and is not a condition by the intent of the Testator and hereby the determination of the estâ—…e the Fee and Frank-tenement is cast upon him in the next remainder that shall not alien without Entrie as upon an Escheat or dying without issue and hath the intent as if it were devised untill he shall alien The entry of Scholastica the wife of Newis becaus I. and F. C. her brothers levied a Fine suffered a common Recovery by the Court is lawfull But the Writ was abared for that it was coram Justic ' predict where no Justices were named before because the Fine and Recovery are such Acts Bargains and Incumbrances which make a forfeiture for that they give title and occasion to defeat the estates taile limitted to I. and F. C. For by the Fine with Proclamations the estate of I. is barrable and by the Recovery the Taile of him and F. is defeated and so within the words and the intent of the penaltie of the last Will of their Father H.C. Also the penaltie here inflicted for the forfeiture is not a condition by the intent of the Testator which will not that all the estates Tailes shall be defeated for entry for the condition broken by him in possession or any in remainder shall defeat all estates and put him which enters in of such an estate as he had before the condition made as 29. Ass pl. 7. Brooke Conditions inwords in a Will lik unto a condition shal not make a Condition because the intent of the party appears not to be to defeat all the state scilicet of him in remainder there also it is not a condition here because then he breaks it which enters for the condition But this is a limitation which determines the estate Ipso facto without making any discontinuance of it by the alienation and hereby the determination of the estate the Fee and Franck Tenement is cast upon him in the next remainder which aliened not without entry as upon an Escheator dying without issue and hath the intent as was devised quo usque he shall alien or incumber So land given to I. in tail so long as I.S. hath issue of his body which dieth without issue there it shall revest presently without entrie for words named in a Will if they are not apt shall be drawn to the intent and the Law submits it self to the Will as to the Parliament as Dyer termed it in matter order and form So a gift of Land so long as such a one is Abbot or during coverture is a limitation So Matrimonii prolocuti there the estate shall be defeated by the intent without expresse Condition in Deed Fitzh nra.br ' 201. E. A man devises to a woman in London upon condition that if she marrie the land shall remain to his sonne in taile with remainder over the woman marries the sonne shall have ex gravi querela by Fitzh by Dier he may enter So it shall be taken as a limitation yet it sounds as a Condition And by Dier a condition in deed in a conveyance made By Fitz-James 28. H. 8. was taken by limitation a fortiori where it is by last Will where the intent shall rule the words and the words not the intent and the intent shall be observed in the exposition of Wills and of the Testator in making of his Will hath a Power like to an Act of Parliament by Dier and the intent in a devise shall make Estates passe contrary to the Rules of the common Law in Deeds or other gifts as a Remainder is good without an Estate precedent So where the particular Tenant entailed disagrees see 34. E. 3. where it depends upon condition so upon a devise to the sonne after the death of his wife there she takes an estate for life although it be not given to her so 10. H. 7.20 Cestuy que vse devises that a woman his Executrix shall sell the land she sells it to her second husband good So a devise to a man and his heires males which hath issue a daughter who hath issue a sonne he shall inherit 28. H. 8. by Dier otherwise Bracebridge against Cooke LEssee for yeares grant his terme to the wife of the Lessor Tr. 14. El. in the Kings Bench in E Firme and a stranger the wife dies the stranger shall have the whol terme and land by survivor Adjudged 1. For that the interest of the husband by reason of the coverture severs not the Joinctureâ— nor alters the possession of the terme or other chattells realls of the wife but is possessed of them in the right of his wife so that if a stranger outs them the wife ought to joyn with the husband in Ei firme and she shall have judgement as well as the husband and therefore if the husband charges it or if he devise the terme and dies the devise is void because he had the Estate in him at the time and before the time of his death But the property of Chattells personalls is devested out of the wife and vests in the husband because of the coverture and therefore if one gives goods to a Fem covert and a stranger the joyncture is presently severed by the Law and she and the stranger shall be Tenants in common 2. The immediate Fee and frank Tenement that the husband hath in his owne right shall not drown the terme which he hath in the right of his wife where she is sole Lessee nor the moitie of the terme where she is joint Lessee as here and the operation of the Law shall not do a thing contrary to equity and reason to the prejudice of another namely in Chattells Realls which are things of continuance because the husband by expresse act hath not given nor altered it as he may by making of a Feoffment of the land or new Leas c. But hath left it to the judgement of the Law The Law preserves the estate of the wife which estate as to the wife is disjoint from the Freehold and Fee-simple but a rent granted to the terrenant and a stranger the Tenant dies the other shall not have all because the Moity drownes in the land and therefore that was not in joyncture at the time of the death of him which first died and the other shall not have all as survivor But the rent here shall be apportioned because of the occupation that every one hath per my et tout of the profits But husband and wife here cannot joyn in E firme with the stranger But the Husband shall use his reall action upon an