every eight hides or plough-land through the whole Kingdom shall find a man with a Crosset and Helmet to the Naval Expedition And every three hundred and ten plough-plough-lands an ordinary ship For these purposes was the whole Land formerly divided either by Alfred the great or some other precedent King into 243600. hydes or plough-plough-lands and according to this division were the military and other charges of the Kingdom impos'd and proportion'd without ever any mention of Tenures in â—â—â—ite or by Knight-service Hence it rose that the Saxon Kings in granting oâ— lands liberties and priviledges unto Ecclesiastical persons and others were usually so careful in reserving Expedition Burghbote and Brigbote as you may see in the Charters of King Withred Ina Aethelbald Aethelwulph Edgar c. in the Britain Councils as also in the Charters here following and in a multitude of others elsewhere besides Neither did this Military Expedition otherwise at that time bind the Saxons to a Tenure in capite or Knight-service then it doth us at this day in the Naval Expedition lately now reviv'd For better manifestation that Thanelands were subject to no feudal service consider I pray you the words of the Saxon passage before mention'd where it is said that a Thane must have three hydes at least of his agenes lande i. e. of his own land not terrae emphiteuticariae or precariae not usu-fructuariae or feodatariae but as a Latin copy hath it terrae suae propriae where the word propriae carrieth another sense than is ordinarily conceiv'd as to signifie in this place land wherein no other man hath any interest by feodal superiority or dominion but whereof himself hath meram proprietatem the sole and absolute propriety even the same Alodium that is spoken of in the Report and which no man hath or can have now at this day but the King's land holden of no man in the feodal sense for the phrase of tenure was not then in use amongst the Saxons nor ty'd any man to do any feodal service Another old Latin MS. therefore reciteth the same Saxon passage in these words Si villanus so they at that time call'd a Husbandman ita crevisset sua probitate quod pleniter haberet quinque hidas de suo proprio alodio c. dignus erat honore Liberalitatis quod Angli dicunt Ãanescipes surðe si autem liberalis homo 1. Ãegen Thanus ita profecisset ut Regi servisset vice sua equitaret in Missatico Regis hic talis si haberet alium Thanum sub se qui ad expeditionem Regis quinque hidas teneret in Aula Regis domino suo servisset c. Here I must say with Cujacius speaking of the Author of the second Book of Feuds Proprietatem alias vocat quod hic Alodium Noting thereby that Proprietaâ— and Alodium are synonima signifying land free from all feodal service and holden of no body Yet in that sense Alodium is here said to be Terra ad expeditionem Regis land oblig'd to the warfare of the King I must note also by the way that he that thus translated the Saxon passage by the words qui ad expeditionem Regis quinque hidas teneret follow'd the manner which before we spake of in rendring Saxon customs by Norman phrases The Reader perhaps will here understand teneret in the feodal sense for to hold of his Lord whereas in the Saxon book the words are no otherwise than gif he heâ—de i. e. if he had five hydes of land so that teneret here is no otherwise to be taken than for possideret To return to our purpose Thaneland might no doubt be tyed to do Military service or Knight-service and yet not holden in capite or by Knight-service for it is one thing to hold by Knight-service and another to be tyed to do it No man holdeth that hath not tenementum or tenementale quiddam But a man might be tyed to do this military expedition for his personal estate tho' he had no land or for his very person it self as appeareth by the laws of King Ina Cap. 52. where it is said gif se siðcundman c. If the Sithcundman having land forbeareth to go the Expedition he shall forfeit his land and 120s. and if he have no land yet he shall forfeit 60s. and an Husbandman who if he had land was but Tenant in Socage according to our Law 30s. It appeareth also by many Charters of the Saxon Kings that Thane lands were not feodal and that the military Expedition mde no Tenure by Knight-service Give me leave therefore to produce some of them that you may see thereby the use of those times and what the Kings themselves conceiv'd therein CHAP. IX Charters of Thane-lands granted by Saxon Kings not only without mention of Tenure or Feodal service but with all Immunity except Expedition c. EGO Eadwigh Monarchiam totius Britanniae Insulae cum superno juvamine obtinens cuidam meo fideli Ministro vocitato nomine Aelfwine duas mansas dimidiam tribuo perenniter illic ubi antiquorum hominum relatu nominatur at Schylfhinghatune habeat quam diu vivat post cui voluerit impertiat cum his rebus quae sibi rite pertinent tam in magnis quam in minimis Sit haec donatio immunis a servitute mundana excepto illo labore qui communis omni populo videtur esse not naming Expeditione c. but concluding Si quis augeat augeatur Si quis minuat careat praemio aeterno c. So that here he was freed a servitute mundana both great and small that was incident or inherent to the land by way of Tenure and yet he was chargeable to military Expedition and to the repairing of Bridges Castles Burroughs and Fortifications but that not otherwise than as all the land of the Kingdom was charg'd as before we have shew'd Regnante in perpetuum Domino nostro c. Ego Eadgarus Rex Anglorum caeterarumque gentium in circuitu persistentium gubernator rector cuidam fideli meo Ministro vocato nomine Alur modicam muniminis mei partem Terrae i. e. in Dorset tres perticas in illo loco ubi Anglica appellatione dicitur at Lonk ut habeat ac possideat quamdiu vivat post se unum haeredem quicunque sibi placuerit derelinquat Sit hoc praedictum rus liberum ab omni malorum obstaculo cum omnibus ad rus rite pertinentibus campis pascuis pratis sylvis Excepto communi labore Expeditione pontis arcis constructione Si quis vero hominum hanc meam Donationem cum stultitiae temeritate jactando infringere tentaverit sit ipse gravibus per colla depressis catenis inter flamivomes tetrorum doemonum catervas nisi prius ad satisfactionem emendare voluerit Istis terminis haec tellus ambita videtur Ãis is þe landgemark at Lonk c. Haec
of a Fine as was common in all cases of Feodal Tenures This hath some shew of our Escuage and might well have taken that name from the manner of summons used in the Empire which was by erecting a post or pillar and hanging a Shield at the top thereof an Herald proclaiming that all who held in this manner should at such a day attend the Emperour in his voyage to Rome for taking the Crown of Italy or King of Romans which the Ligurine Poet thus expresseth Ligno suspenditur alte Erecto Clypeus tunc Praeco regius omnes Convocat a dominis feudalia jura tenentes c. as we have shew'd in our Glossary verbo Feudum He useth Clypeus for a Shield instead of Scutum and from this shield I say it might well be called Scutagium as also from the service performed in it cum hasta scuto Yet this summons was not called Schiltbannum but Heribannum that is indictio exercitus not indictio sâ—uti But to keep nearer the matter First our Saxons neither used the name nor the rules of the Norman Escuage for they called their going to war upon legal summons firdfare and utfare in Latin Expeditionem and Profectionem Secondly they were not tyed to any definite time of abode as for fourty days or more or less but as the law saith sÆ¿a a ðon ðearf sy for gemeneâ—â—â—re neode so as need shall require for common necessity Thirdly the mulct or forfeiture that the Tenant in Escuage incurred for not going forth upon that summons was uncertain among the Normans and us 'till the Parliament assign'd it but among the Saxons he that offended in Ferdwite that is in not going forth in the Expedition was certainly fin'd at 120 Fourthly whereas every Lord among us had the fine assess'd by Parliament of his own Tenant for the Lands holden of himself the King among the Saxons had the fine aforesaid of every delinquent whose Tenant or follower soever he were by all the Laws of the kingdom that is to say by the West-Saxon Law by the Mercian and by the Dane Law tho' otherwise they differ'd in their Heriots and many particular customs So that to talk of Escuage among the Saxons is without all colour or probability as I take it CHAP. XXIII No Feodal Escheate of Hereditary Lands among the Saxons EScheats of Eschoeir in French signifieth things coming accidentally as on the by or by chance The Fâ—odists therefore call them Caduca a cadendo and excadentias the black book of the Exchequer Escaetas excidentia and excadentia but among our Saxons I find no word to express them either properly or paraphrastically In our Law they be of two sorts Regal Escheats and Feodal Regal are those obventions and forfeitures which belong generally to Kings by the ancient right of their Crowns and supreme dignity Thus King David gave the lands of Mephibosheth accused of Treason unto Ziba tho' too hastily Feodal are those which accrue to every Feodal Lord as well as to the King by reason of his Seignory and of all the fruits of Tenure none so great as this if we may call it a fruit where the feud or tree it self resulteth back unto the Lord. Let us see therefore if we find any of these Feodal Escheats among the Saxons There is a shrewd text I confess in Canutus his Laws Qui fugiet à domino suo vel socio pro timiditate in expeditione navali vel terrestri perdat omne quod suum est suam ipsius vitam manus mittat dominus ad terram quam ei dederat si terram haereditariam habeat ipsa in manum Regis transeat Here is the appearance of a Tenure of a Feud of a Forfeiture and of an Escheat The Tenure lyeth between the Lord and his fugitive Vassal whom the Saxons and Germans called his Man we his Tenant The Feud in the Land quam dâ—mâ—nus â—i dederat The forfeiture in fugiendo in the Vassals running away And the Esâ—heat in the Lord 's seizing of the land manus mittat dominus in terram quam ei dederat Let the Lord take back the estate which he gave in the temporary feud But for the hereditary land he saith transeat non redeat in manum Regis All this is nothing in our case for I declared in the beginning that our question was fix'd upon such feuds as the Law of England taketh notice of at this day that is of feuds after they were become hereditary and perpetual not of those mention'd by Gerardus Niger which were temporary as at will of the Lord or for years or for life like them here intended by Canutus This very Law observeth the difference and discovereth also that feuds were not hereditary in his time and therefore giveth the feodal land being but a temporary estate back unto the Lord in whom the Reversion was by inheritance as a feodal right but giveth the hereditary Lands unto the King as a Regal Escheat for that there was no mean or intervenient Lord to claim them by any feodal tenure for that the hereditary lands among the Saxons otherwise called Bocland were holden of no body nor subject to any feodal service as we have often declared and could not therefore Escheat unto any feodal Lord. The Kentish custom of the father to the Bough and the son to the Plough suggesteth as much and sheweth also to have been the general use of England till the Conquerour introducing hereditary feuds put upon us therewith these greater feodal servitudes of Wardship Marriage Escheats c. So that the hereditary lands not being feodal in the Saxon's time nor the feodal lands hereditary there could then be no feodal Escheats among them And I take it to be considerable whether the land resumed by the Lord upon his Vassal's running away be properly an Escheat by the Law of Canutus or rather a penalty only impos'd in this particular case CHAP. XXIV Thaneland and Reveland what no marks of Tenure but distinctions of Land-holders THere is yet another assertion rather shewed than proved That the Thani majores or King's Thanes held by personal service of the King's person by Grand Serjanty or Knights-service in Capite And the reason following is that the land so held was in those times called Thane-land as land holden in Socage was called Reveland so frequently in Doomsday Haec terra fuit terra Regis Edwardi Thainland sed postea conversa est in Reveland Coke's Instit § 117. Thus the Report dischargeth it self upon my Lord Coke whose words be these It is to be observ'd that in the book of Doomsday land holden by Knights-service was called Thainland and land holden by Socage was called Reveland I reverence the opinion of that famous Lawyer with admiration but I suppose he speaketh not this ex tripode juridico For it is impossible that it and that which is before deliver'd out of the
Rex ipsum Henr. Sharnburn singulari quadam gratia favore amplectens primo fecit eum militem deinde le Provost Marshall postea Vice-Admirallum Angliae misitque cum ad mare navi viris armis fortiter munita ut perpulsaret a finibus nostris perfugaret piratos praedones praecipue ex Gallica gente qui eo tempore plurimum praedabantur in oris Angliae In quo negotio viriliter quidem ipse Henr. se gerebat quamvis sibi inutiliter successerit Nam post multa a se praeclare ac valide gesta tandem forte incidit in Admirallum Franciae cum quo ferocissime crudelissime habuit pugnam in qua plurimi ex utraque parte occisi fuerunt quorum percipuus erat ipse dominus Henricus Sharnburn sic finierunt dies ejus Praedictus autem Thomas Sharnburn filius haeres dicti domini Henr. Sharnburn jam tunc aetate XVIII annorum erat cum patre suo in navi in praedicta pugna ubi ingens insolitus bombardarum sonitus aures suas ita obtudit ut semper postea per totam vitam surdus remanserit Serviebat tamen Illustrissimae Principi dominae Mariae filiae primogenitae Regis Henrici VIII ex ejus familia elegit sibi uxorem nomine Elizabetham Atwell unam ex ancillis dictae principis ex qua procreavit unum filium duas filias qui omnes in infantia aut puerili aetate mortui sunt Ipsa autem Elizabetha uxor dicti Thomae Sharnburn in partu unius dictorum liberorum spiritum spiravit extremum XIII die Feb. Anno Regis Henrici VIII XXX sepultus est apud Sharnburn Sed praedictus Thomas brevi tempore post accepit aliam conjugem nomine Blitham Brampton filiam Johannis Brampton de Brampton in Comit. Norff. Armigeri quae peperit sibi quinque filios duas filias quorum primus erat Christopherus Sharnburn qui natus fuit XII die Oct. Anno Regni Henr. VIII XXX V. An. Dom. 1542. de quo postea Secundus erat Antonius Sharnburn qui obiit eodem die quo natus fuit viz. XXIV Feb. anno Regis Henrici VIII XXXV 1543. Tertius erat Dorothea Sharnburn quae nata fuit XX. die Nov. anno Henrici VIII XXXVII 1545. Quae Dorothea primo nupta fuit Johanni Plumstede de Plumstede in Comit. Norff. generoso post mortem dicti Thomae nupsit cuidam Roberto Nichols habuit exitum ex utroque marito Quartus erat Henr. Sharnburn qui natus fuit IV. die Apr. anno Regis Edwardi VI. primo An. Dom. 1547. Quintus erat Thomas Sharnburn qui natus fuit XXIII die Sept. Edwardi VI. secundo qui obiit infantulus in Ingoldsthorp apud nutricem suam Sextus autem fuit Anna Sharnburn quae nata erat III. die Novemb. anno Edwardi VI. tertio obiit in infantia apud Dersyngham cum nutrice sua Septimus erat Antonius Sharnburn qui ortns fuit XX. die Mar. anno Regni Edwardi VI. quinto An. Dom. 155â— qui obiit etiam tertio die Jan. An. Dom. 16â—4 anno aetatis suae LIII quia celibatam degebat vitam nullum ex se 〈◊〉 exitum Praedictus autem Thomas Sharnburn pater praedictorum liberorum in senectute sua saepe vehementer gravabatur ex dolore lapidis in â—enibus vesica qui morbus ita vires suas naturales debilitavit mortem approximavit ut XXII die Mar. An. Dom. 1559. diem clausit extremum Et sepultus est in Capella Ecclesiae de Sharnburn atque praedicta Blitha uxor ejus supervixit eum habuit sibi pro termino vitae suae totum manerium de Sharnburn nupsitque cuidam Lanceloto Smalperd generoso cum quo degebat pluribus annis supervixit eum per decem annos ita ut omnes dies ipsius Blithae possunt computari ad octoginta sex vel septem annos obiit autem primo die Nov. An. Dom. 1602. sepulta est in Capella Ecclesiae de Sharnburn loco ubi Thomas Sharnburn maritus suus sepultus fuit Modo dicendum est de Christophero Sharnburn primo filio praedictorum Thomae Blithae qui postquam ad virilem aetatem pervenerat duxit in uxorem Annam Veere ex progenie Comit. Oxon. consanguineam Thomae Ducis Norff. ex qua procreavit Franciscum Sharnburn de quo postea Et praedictus Christopherus obiit sexto die Julii An. Dom. 1576. anno aetatis suae tricesimo quarto sepultus in inferiori parte Capellae Ecclesiae de Sharnbâ—rn prope parietem FINIS A DIALOGUE Concerning the COIN of the KINGDOM Particularly What great Treasures were exhausted from England by the usurp't Supremacie of Rome Viandante Selvaggio VIand ..... God amend them But to return to the point that led us into this digression The excessive price of Meat I pray let us now leave foreign Countries to look a little into our own and tell me what you think to be the cause that the prices of things do so far exceed the proportion of ancient times For I have seen in an old Evidence that a good Cow was in those days sold for ten or twelve shillings and at this day I dare say such an one will cost thirty or fourty shillings and so likewise of other things Selv. How sore soever Victualers Inn-keepers Taverns and such like gripe their Guests and Travellers yet it is worth the examining whether the prices of things be in any notable excess greater than in ancient times they have been For if we consider the value of the shilling then with the value of the shilling now we shall find that their shilling was in value three of ours For then out of an ounce of Silver they coin'd but sive groats and after because mony was scarce in the Land the King caused ten groats to be made of an ounce So that by this means there grew to be twice as much mony in the Land as was afore and yet never the more of Silver After in the 36. of Henr. VIII it was enhaunc'd to four shillings the ounce and now lastly unto five So that now our five shillings neither weigheth nor is more worth in Silver than their sive groats of ancient time And then it followeth by necessary consequence that the Cow that you speak of to be sold for ten shillings may now be well worth thirty shillings and yet no difference at all in their prices For admit that the custom used in the time of the Conqueror and since also as appeareth by Doomsday-book c. had continu'd until this day to receive and pay all summs of mony according unto the weight and touch without respect of the Stamp or Coin then was the price of your ten shilling Cow six ounces of Silver and ours of thirty shillings is so likewise and not one peny more sic de caeteris But admit again that the Queen's Majesty should reduce her Coin
Reliquiae Spelmannianae THE POSTHUMOUS WORKS OF Sir HENRY SPELMAN Kt. Relating to the LAWS and ANTIQUITIES OF ENGLAND Publish'd from the ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS With the LIFE of the AUTHOR Sine dubio domus Jurisconsulti est totius oraculum Civitatis Cicero OXFORD Printed at the THEATER for Awnsham and John Churchill at the Black-Swan in Pater-Noster-Row LONDON 1698. Imprimatur JOH MEARE VICE-CAN OXON Jan. 17. 1698. TO THE Most Reverend Father in God THOMAS LORD ARCH-BISHOP OF CANTERBURY PRIMATE of All ENGLAND And METROPOLITAN And one of his Majesty's most Honourable Privy Council MY LORD I BEG leave to lay before your Grace these Posthumous Discourses of Sir Henry Spelman promising them a favourable reception both for their own worth and for the sake of their Author He was a Person endow'd with those excellent Qualities which never fail to recommend others to your Grace's good opinion and esteem A Gentleman of great Learning and a hearty Promoter and Encourager of it In his Temper Calm and Sedate and in his Writings Grave and Inoffensive a true lover of the Establisht Church and a zealous maintainer of her Rights and Privileges In which respect the Clergy of this Nation were more particularly engag'd to Him because being a Lay-man and so not lyable to the suspicion of Prejudice or Interest his Reasonings carry'd in them a greater weight and authority than if they had come from one of their own Order I might add as some sort of excuse for this Trouble that He had the honour to be particularly respected by two of your Grace's Predecessors and some of his Posthumous Works by a third Arch-bishop Abbot and his immediate Successor were the chief Encouragers of the First Volume of his Councils and after his death the Second Part of his Glossary was publisht by the procurement of Arch-bishop Sheldon So that these Papers have a kind of hereditary right to your Grace's Protection All the share that I have in this Work is the handing it into the World and to make the first Present to your Grace would be no more than a decent regard to the Eminence of your Station though I had no particular obligation to do it But in my Circumstances I should think my self very ungrateful if enjoying so much Happiness under your Grace's Patronage I should omit any opportunity of expressing my Thankfulness for it Especially since such small Acknowledgements as this are the only Returns that I can ever hope to make for the Encouragement which You daily afford to Your GRACE'S most obliged and most dutiful Servant EDMUND GIBSON THE PREFACE I Shall not make any Apologie for the publication of these Treatises They seem'd to me to be very useful towards a right understanding of the Laws and Antiquities of England and I hope they will appear so to others too Nor need I endeavour to recommend them to the world any otherwise than by shewing them to be the genuine Labours of Sir H. Spelman whose Learning Accuracy and Integrity are sufficiently known The first of them concerning Feuds and Tenures in England was written in the Year 1639. and is printed from a fair Copy in the Bodleian Library corrected with Sir Henry Spelman's own hand The Occasion of writing it was the Great Case of Defective Titles in Ireland as may be gathered in some measure from the hints that our Author has given us but is much more evident from the Case it self printed afterwards by order of Thomas Viscount Wentworth the then Lord Deputie The Grounds thereof with the Pleadings and Resolutions so far as they concern the Original of Tenures were in short thus The several Mannours and Estates within the Counties of Roscomon Sligo Mayo and Gallway in the Kingdom of Ireland being unsettl d as to their Titles King James I. by Commission under the Great Seal dated the 2d day of March in the 4th Year of his Reign did authorize certain Commissioners by Letters Patents to make Grants of the said Lands and Mannours to the respective Owners Whereupon several Letters Patents to that effect passed under his Majesties Great Seal by virtue of the said Commission for the strengthening of Titles that might otherwise seem defective And afterwards in the Reign of King Charles I. upon an Enquirie into his Majestie 's Title to the Countie of Mayo there was an Act of State publisht commanding all those who held any Lands in that County by Letters Patents from the Crown to produce them or the Enrollment thereof before the Lord Deputie and Council by a certain day To the end that they might be secur'd in the quiet possession of their Estates in case the said Letters were allow'd by that Board to be good and effectual in Law In pursuance of this Order several Letters Patents were produc'd and particularly the Lord Viscount Dillon's which last upon the perusal and consideration thereof by his Majestie 's Council were thought to be void in Law And therefore it was order'd by the Lord Deputie and Council that the doubt arising upon the Letters Patents should be drawn up into a Case and that Case to be openly argu'd at the Council-Board The Case was drawn up in these words King James by Commission under the Great Seal dated the second day of March in the fourth year of his Reign did authorize certain Commissioners to grant the Mannour of Dale by Letters Patents under the Great Seal of this Kingdom to A. and his heirs and there is no direction given in the said Commission touching the Tenure to be reserv'd There are Letters Patents by colour of the said Commission pass'd unto A. and his heirs to hold by Knights Service as of his Majesties Castle of Dublin Here it was agreed on all hands that the Letters Patents were void as to the Tenure and that the Commissioners had acted beyond their Commission in reserving a mean Tenure to the prejudice of the King when they ought either to have reserv'd an express Tenure by Knight's Service in Capite or have mention'd no Tenure at all but have left the Law to imply a Tenure in Capite The question therefore was Whether the deficiency of the Tenure did so far affect the Grant as wholly to destroy the Letters Patents Or Whether the Letters Patents might not be good as to the Land and void only as to the Tenure The Case was argu'd several days by Counsel on both sides and was afterwards deliver'd up to the Judges who were requir'd by the Lord Deputie and Council to consider of it and to return their Resolution But upon private Conference not agreeing in their Opinions it was thought necessary for publick satisfaction to have it argu'd solemnly by them all which was accordingly done And when it came to be debated whether the reservation of a Tenure so different from that intended and warranted by the Commission could make void the whole Grant this happen'd to lead them to a more general Enquirie What the reservation of a Tenure is
to the Grant whether it be a part of the Grant and the modus concessionis or whether it be a distinct thing and Aliud from the Grant For so the Printed Case represents their Opinion if the Reservation of the Tenure and the Grant of the Land be aliud aliud two distinct things in the consideration of the whole Grant made and the authority given by the said Commission for the making thereof then the Patent may be void as to the Tenure and yet good for the Grant of the Land But if the Reservation of the Tenure be incident unto the authority and included within it and the Reservation of the Tenure and the Grant of the Land make up but one entire Grant so that the one is a part of the other and the Reservation of the Tenure be Modus concessionis then the granting of the Land reserving a diverse or contrary Tenure to that which their nude authority did warrant them to reserve is a doing of Idem alio modo and so the whole Act is void They who pleaded for the validity of the Letters Patents as to the Lands and their being void only as to the Tenure urg'd among other arguments That Tenures in Capite were brought into England by the Conquest but Grants were by the Common-Law and therefore Grants being more ancient than Tenures the Tenure must of necessity be aliud from the thing granted And to prove that this Tenure came in with the Conqueror they cited Mr. Selden in his Spicileg ad Eadmerum p. 194. where he hath that out of Bracton de Acquir Rerum Dominio b. 2. Forinsecum servitium dicitur Regale servitium quia spectat ad Dominum Regem non ad alium secundum quod in Conquestu fuit adinventum But this Argument and the Authority were both over-ruld and it was affirm'd that Tenures were not brought into England by the Conqueror but were common among the Saxons Their Answer to Mr. Selden's Opinion with the Reasons upon which they grounded their position I will transcribe at large from the Printed Case the Book being very scarce and this the only Point wherein Sir Henry Spelman is concern'd It was answered that Mr. Selden in that place does barely recite the words of Bracton not delivering any Opinion of his own For in that Book cited pag. 170. and in his Titles of Honour the last Edition p. 612. We find that he was of another Opinion and that this Tenure was in use in England in the times of the Saxons What were those Thani Majores or Thani Regis among the Saxons but the Kings immediate Tenants of Lands which they held by personal service as of the Kings person by Grand Serjeanty or Knights-service in Capite The Land so held was in those times called Thain-land as Land holden in Socage was called Reveland so frequently in Dooms-day Haec terra fuit terra Regis Edwardi Thainland sed postea conversa est in Reveland Cokes Instit Sect. 117. After some years that followed the coming of the Normans the title of Thane grew out of use and that of Baron and Barony succeeded for Thane and Thain-land Whereby we may understand the true and original Reason of that which we have in the Lord Cromwels Case 2. Coke 81. That every Barony of ancient time was held by Grand Serjeanty by that Tenure were the Thain-lands held in the time of the Saxons and those Thain-lands were the same that were after called Baronies 'T is true the Possessions of Bishops and Abbots were first made subject to Knights-service in Capite by William the Conquerour in the fourth year of his Reign for their Lands were held in the times of the Saxons in pura perpetua Eleemosyna free ab omni servitio saeculari But he then turned their Possessions into Baronies and so made them Barons of the Kingdom by Tenure so that as to them this Tenure and Service may be said to be in Conquestu adinventum But the thain-Thain-lands were held by that Tenure before As the Kings Thane was a Tenant in Capite so the Thanus mediocris or middle Thane was only a Tenant by Knights-service that either held of a mean Lord and not immediately of the King or at the least of the King as of an Honour or Mannour and not in Capite What was that Trinoda Necessitas which so often occurs in the Grant of the Saxon Kings under this Form Exceptisistis tribus Expeditione Arcis pontis exstructione See it in a Charter of King Etbeldred in the Preface to Cokes 6. Report c. But that which was after expressed by Salvo forinseco Bracton lib. 2. cap. 26. 35. 12. Edw. 1. Gard 152. 26. Ass 66. Selden Analect Anglobrit 78. And therefore it was said that Sir Henry Spelman was mistaken who in his Glossary verbo feudum refers the original of Feuds in England to the Norman Conquest It is most manifest that Capite Tenures Tenures by Knights-service Tenures in Socage Frank-almoigne c. were frequent in the times of the Saxons And if we will believe what is cited out of an old French Customary in a MS. Treatise of the Antiquity of Tenures in England which is in many mens hands all those Tenures were in use long before the Saxons even in the times of the Britains there it is said The first British King divided Britain into four parts And gave one part to the Arch-Flamines to pray for him and his posterity A second part he gave to his Earls and Nobility to do him Knights-service A third he divided among Husbandmen to hold of him in Socage The fourth part he gave to Mechanical persons to hold in Burgage But that Testimony was wav'd there being little certainty or truth in the British Story before the times of Caesar Neither would they make use of that which we are taught by William Roville of Alenzon in his Preface to the Grand Customier of Normandy that all those Customs among which these Tenures are were first brought into Normandy out of England by Edward the Confessor Besides that which hath been said we find Feuds both the name and thing in the Laws of those times among the Laws of Edward the Confessor cap. 35. where it is thus provided Debent enim universi Liberi homines secundum feodum suum secundum tenementa sua Arma habere illa semper prompta conservare ad tuitionem Regni servitium dominorum suorum c. Lambard Archaionom 135. This Law was after confirmed by William the Conqueror vid. Cokes Instit Sect. 103. As these Tenures were common in those times so were all the fruits of them Homage Fealty Escuage Reliefs Wardships For Releifs we have full testimony in the Reliefs of their Earls and Thanes for which see the Laws of King Canutus cap. 66 69. The Laws of Edward the Confessor cap. de Heterochiis And what out of the Book of Dooms-day Coke hath in his Instit Sect.
Majesty would please to consider his Son Accordingly the King sent for Mr. Spelman and with many expressions of kindness immediately conferr'd on him the honour of Knighthood After the Civil Wars broke out his Majesty by a Letter under his own hand commanded him from his own house in Norfolk to give his attendance at Oxford where he was oftentimes call'd to Private Councel and employ'd to write several papers in Vindication of the Proceedings of the Court But while he was thus attending the affairs of the Publick and when these would give him leave his own Private Studies he fell sick and died the 25. of July 1643. His Funeral Sermon by his Majestie 's special order was Preached by Arch-bishop Usher an intimate Acquaintance both of the Father and Son In the Year 1640. he had publisht the Saxon Psalter from an ancient MS. of Sir Henry's which as he tells us in the Preface was a task enjoyn'd him by his Father He also wrote the Life of King Alfred in English which having layn several years in Manuscript was at last translated into Latin and publisht in 1678. with Mr. Walker's Commentary upon it Clement Spelman youngest Son to Sir Henry was a Councellor and made Puny Baron of the Exchequer upon the Restoration of King Charles II. He publisht some peices relating to the Government and a large Preface to his Father's Book De non temerandis Ecclesiis Dying in June 1679. he was buried in St. Dunstan's Church in Fleet-street To return to Sir Henry He dy'd in London at the house of Sir Ralph Whitfeild his Son-in-law being about 80. years of Age. His body by the favour of King Charles was appointed to be inter'd in Westminster-Abbey whither it was carried with great solemnity on the 24 th of October 1641. and buried at the foot of the Pillar over against Mr. Camden's Monument The Several DISCOURSES Contain'd in this Volume 1. THe Original Growth Propagation and Condition of Feuds and Tenures by Knight-service in England pag. 1. CHAP. I. The occasion of this Discourse and what a Feud is p. 1. CHAP. II. The Original Growth and Propagation of Feuds first in general then in England p. 2. CHAP. III. That none of our Feodal words nor words of Tenure are found in any Law or ancient Charter of the Saxons p. 7. CHAP. IV. Of Tenures in Capite more particularly p. 10. CHAP. V. What degrees and distinctions of Persons were among the Saxons and of what coudition their Lands were p. 11. CHAP. VI. Of Earls among our Saxons p. 13. CHAP. VII Of Ceorls and that they were ordinarily but as Tenants at will or having Lands held not by Knight-service p. 14. CHAP. VIII Of Thanes and their several kinds p. 16. CHAP. IX Charters of Thane-lands granted by Saxon Kings not only without mention of Tenure or Feodal-service but with all Immunity except Expedition c. p. 19. CHAP. X. Observations upon the precedent Charters shewing that the Thane-lands or Expedition were not Feodal or did lye in Tenure p. 21. CHAP. XI More touching the freedom of Thane-land out of Doomsday p. 23. CHAP. XII The fruits of Feodal Tenures and that they were not found among the Saxons or not after our manner p. 24. CHAP. XIII No profit of Land by Wardship in the Saxons time p. 25. CHAP. XIV No Wardship in England amongst the Saxons objections answer'd p. 25. CAAP. XV. No Marriage of Wards p. 29. CHAP. XVI No Livery no Primer-seisin p. 30. CHAP. XVII That Reliefs whereon the Report most relyeth were not in use among the Saxons nor like their Heriots p. 31. CHAP. XVIII Difference between Heriots and Reliefs p. 32. CHAP. XIX No Fines for Licence of Alienation p. 33. CHAP. XX. No Feodal Homage among the Saxons p. 34. CHAP. XXI What manner of Fealty among the Saxons p. 34. CHAP. XXII No Escuage among the Saxons what in the Empire p. 36. CHAP. XXIII No Feodal Escheate of hereditary Lands among the Saxons p. 37. CHAP. XXIV Thaneland and Reveland what no marks of Tenure but distinctions of Land-holders p. 38. CHAP. XXV How the Saxons held their Lands and what obliged them to so many kinds of Services p. 40. CHAP. XXVI The Charter whereby Oswald Bishop of Worcester disposed divers Lands of his Church after the Feodal manner of that time entituled Indiculum Libertatis de Oswalds-Laws-Hundred p. 41. CHAP. XXVII Inducements to the Conclusion p. 43. CHAP. XXVIII The Conclusion p. 46. II. Of the Ancient Government of England p. 49. III. Of Parliaments p. 57. IV. The Original of the four Terms of the Year p. 67. The Occasion of this Discourse p. 69. SECT I. Of the Terms in general p. 71. SECT II. Of the names of Terms ibid. SECT III. Of the Original of Terms or Law-days p. 73 SECT IV. Of the Times assigned to Law-matters call'd the Terms ibid. CHAP. I. Of Law-days among the Ancients p. 74. CHAP. II. Of Law-days amongst the Romans using choice days p. 75. CHAP. III. Of Law-days among the first Christians using all times alike p. 75. CHAP. IV. How Sunday came to be exempted p. 76. CHAP. V. How other Festival and Vacation-days were exempted ibid. CHAP. VI. That our Terms took their original from the Canon-law p. 77. CHAP. VII The Constitution of our Saxon Kings in this matter ibid. CHAP. VIII The Constitution of Canutus more particular p. 78. CHAP. IX The Constitution of Edw. the Confessor most material p. 79. CHAP. X. The Constitution of William the Conqueror p. 80. CHAP. XI What done by Will. Rufus Henry I. K. Stephen and Hen. II. p. 81. CHAP. XII The Terms laid out according to their ancient Laws p. 82. CHAP. XIII Easter-term p. 83. CHAP. XIV Trinity-term p. 84. CHAP. XV. Of Michaelmass-term according to the ancient Constitutions p. 85. CHAP. XVI The later Constitutions of the Terms p. 86. CHAP. XVII How Trinity term was alter'd and shortn'd p. 87. CHAP. XVIII How Michaelmass-term was abbreviated by Act of Parliament 16. Car. I. Cap. 6. p. 81. SECT V. Other considerations concerning Term-time ibid. CHAP. I. Why the High-Courts sit not in the afternoons p. 89. CHAP. II. Why they sit not at all some days p. 90. CHAP. III. Why some Law business may be done on days exempted p. 93. CHAP. IV. Why the end of Michaelmass-term is sometimes holden in Advent and of Hilary in Septuagesima c. p. 95. CHAP. V. Why Assizes be holden in Lent ibid. CHAP. VI. Of the Returns p. 96. CHAP. VII Of the Quarta dies post p. 97. CHAP. VIII Why there is so much Canon and Foreign Law us'd in this Discourse with an excursion into the original of our Laws p. 98. Appendix p. 104. V. An Apologie for Arch-bishop Abbot touching the death of Peter Hawkins the Keeper wounded in the Park at Bramsil July 24. 1621. p. 107. VI. An Answer to the said Apologie p. 111. VII Letters and Instruments relating to the killing of Hawkins by the A. B.
Thanes we must consider them the more diligently first in the quality of their persons secondly in the tenure of their lands A Thane was in like manner as the Earl not properly a title of dignity but of service so called in the Saxon of â—enian servire and in Latin Minister à ministrando But as there be many degrees of service some of greater estimation and some of less so those that served the King in places of eminency either in Court or Common-wealth were called Thani majores and Thani Regis and those that served under them in like manner as under Dukes Earls and other great Officers of the Kingdom and also under Bishops Abbats and the greater Prelates of the Church were called Thani minores or the lesser Thanes And as the titles of honourable office and service in Dukes Earls c. became at length to be made hereditary so this of Thanes like our titles of Noblemen and Gentlemen descended at last with their Fathers land upon their Children and posterity And continued thus till after the Conquest as appears by some Writs and Charters of the Conquerour Buchanan describing the quality of their persons calleth them Praefectos regionum sive Nomarchas Quaestores rerum capitalium Governours of places principal Ministers of justice Chequer men Sheriffs c. But we will take them as the Saxons themselves describe them in the place before mentioned where it thus followeth gif Ceorl geðeah ê§ he hefde fullice fif hyda agenes lande c. if a churl or husbandman thrive so that he had fully five hydes of his own land a Church and a Kitchin a Bell-house and a Gate-house a seat and a several office in the King's Hall then he was from thenceforth worthy of the rights of a Thane meaning as I understand it he was then one of the greater Thanes or King's Thanes For the lesser Thane is by and by described also in that which followeth viz. And gif ðegen geðeah c. And if a Thane himself so prospered that he served the King and ridd upon his message as others of his Court and then had a Thane i. e. an under or lesser Thane that followed him which had five hydes or plough-land chargeable to the King's expedition and served his Lord in the King's Court and had gone thrice upon his errand to the King he this under-Thane might take an oath instead of his Lord and at any great need supply the place of his Lord. And if a Thane did so thrive as he became an Earl he had the rights of an Earl And a Merchant might become a Thane c. Mr. Lambard conceiveth this place to discover but three degrees among the Saxons viz. Earls Thanes and Ceorls not admitting the under-Thane to be a several degree The words seem otherwise and the Saxon division before recited maketh four degrees Earl Ceorl Thegn and Theoden or under Thane Some therefore distinguish Thanes into majores and minores some into majores minores otherwise called mediocres and minimi whom Canutus in his Forest-laws calleth Minuti and Tinemen I dare not venture to define them particularly but will rest upon the Saxon division first mentioned which I find to be pursued by Norman terms in the laws of Edw. Confess and William Conq. delivered by Ingulfus viz. Count Baron Valvasor and Villain Where he placeth Count instead of Earl Baron instead of Kings-Thane Valvasor instead of Theoden or lesser Thane and lastly Villain instead of Churl As though the division both of the Saxon and Norman times did hold analogy one with the other and both of them with ours at this day viz. of Earls and Barons of the Kingdom including the greater Nobility Barons of Towns and Mannours including the lesser Nobility or Gentry and that of our Yeomen including the Husbandmen To return to the Thanes This Saxon passage hath per transennam shew'd unto us not only the quality of their person but the nature of their land whereupon all our Question doth depend And true it is it sheweth that both they and it were subject to military service call'd in Latin Expeditio in Saxon utfare and ferdgung and in foreign Nations Heribannum that is the calling forth of an Army And it appeareth by an ancient MS. of Saxon Laws in the Kings Library that the Thanes were not only tyed to this but to many other services to be done unto the King and that in respect of their land which notwithstanding bred no Tenure in Capite or by Knights-service The words be these Tbani lex est ut sit dignus rectitudine testamenti sui ut tria faciat pro terra sua Expeditionem Burghbotam Brugbotam de multis terris majus Landirectum Exurgit ad Bannum Regis sicut est Deorhege ad mansionem regiam Sceorpum in hosticum custodiam maris capitis pacis Elmesfeoh Ciricsetum i. e. pecunia Eleemosynae Ciricsceatum aliae res Thus in English The Law touching a Thane is That he have power to make a will and that in respect of his land he shall do three things viz. Military Expedition Repairing of Castles and mending of Bridges and for more lands to do more Land-duties To go forth upon the King's summons to the enclosing of his Park and Mansion-house and to ..... into the enemies Lands and to defend the Sea his own head and the peace to pay Alms-monies Church-seeds Church-shots and other things What is there in all this to shew either a Tenure in capite or by Knight-service It will be said that the Military Expediton and Warding of the Sea against enemies imply a tenure by Knight-service and that those and the other services being to be performed to the King and upon the King's summons shew a Tenure in capite And no doubt so would it be for lands given in this manner by the King since the Conquest But I conceive that none of all this riseth out of any Tenure or Feodal reservation made by the Saxon Kings in granting these lands or by any particular contract agreed of by the Thane or Subject in accepting them but out of a fundamental law or custom of the Kingdom as ancient as the Kingdom it self whereby all the land of the whole Kingdom was oblig'd to this Trinodae necessitati of military Expedition and building or repairing of Castles and Bridges so that if this made a tenure by Knight-service in Capite in the Thane Lands then must it follow also that all the land of the Kingdom was likewise holden by Knights-service in capite for it was wholly tyed to those three services as appeareth in the Council of Eanham Cap. 22. 23 where they are commanded to be yearly done And by the laws of Canutus Cap. 10. 62. where they are appointed to be done as necessity requireth And also by the law of King Ethelred who about the thirtieth year of his reign ordain'd that
under these names all the lands that belong'd thereunto And those that dwelt upon those mansas c. they called not tenentes holders as we do but manentes as persons abiding there All the foresaid words being of the middle-age-dialect not appropriated to the feodal language Fourthly In granting of feuds and feud lands the consideration is allways for matter de futuro as pro homagio servitio habendo But here in granting these Thane-lands the consideration is for service past or present signified by the quality of the Thane as fideli ministro meo or pro placabili obsequio not only without reservation of any future service but with express immunity from all services as to use the words of the Charters themselves 1. ut sint libera vel immunia à servitute mundana 2. Ab omni malorum obstaculo 3. Liberrima ab omni munduali obstaculo 4. Liberrimum ab omni munduali obstaculo in magnis modicis 5. Aeterna libertate jocundum 6. Liberum ab omni seculari gravedine Such was the freedom of these Thane-lands equal and no less than that of the lands given in Franck-Almoigne by King Edgar in the last cited Charter which are there said to be Omni terrenae servitutis jugo liberae imperpetuum Fifthly The Feodal lands might not be aliened without Licence But the Thane by the very words of his original Charter might grant them cuicunque voluerit Sixthly A Feodal tenant or tenant by Knights-service as we call him could not devise his land by Will before the statute of 32. Hen. VIII tho' it were with Licence of the Lord and of the King himself which law the Germans themselves do hold even unto this day And the Danes can yet devise no land by Will as I am informed but the Thane might devise his Thane-land to whom he would as appeareth bâ— the words of King Edward the Confessor in a Charter to Thola where he saith Possideat hanc meam regiam donaâ—â—onem quamdiu vivat post obitum suum cuicunque voluerit haeredi relinquat excluding hereby all title of Wardship and Feodal duties To the same effect are the rest of the Charters and therewith agreeth the priviledge of a Thane before mentioned Thani lex est ut sit dignus rectitudine testamenti sui As for that passage in the Will of Brictrick the Saxon where he seeketh his Lord s consent that his Will may stand I conceive it to be in respect of some â—oâ—â—â—oâ—â—land or custumary land which according to the use of that time he held at the will of his Lord and not in respect of any Thane-land For tho' this Brictrick were a man of great possessions yet was he none of the chiefest sort of Thanâ—s called the King's Thanes but as appeareth by his Will an under-Thane belonging to Aelfric who was Earl of Mercia And how far the priviledge of these under or lesser-Thanes extended I cannot yet determine Seventhly If Thane-land were of the nature of lands holden by Knight-service then by the Feodal law of that time it could not transire a lancea ad fusum that is it might not be granted to Women for Women were not then nor long after capable of Feodal land But the land here granted to Thola was Thane-land as appeareth by the very words of her Charter for that it is granted in aeternam haereditatem perpetualiter possidendam which words making an estate of inheritance were only proper to Thane-land otherwise called Bocland not to Folcland or Popular land which was but at Will of the Lord for years or for life Eighthly There could no tenure nor service lye upon the Thane-lands other than what was expressed in the Charters For in the end of every of them there was an horrible curse which in those days was fearfully respected laid by the King himself upon all those that should violate the Charter either by adding other incumbrances or by diminishing the granted immunities So that it is not to be supposed that there was any lurking Tenure or matter of plus ultra to impeach them The curse beginneth in every of the Charters with these words Si quis autem c. Ninthly and lastly Touching Expedition and repairing of Castles and Bridges which the Saxons called Burghbote and Brugbote tho' the two first of them be wholly military and the last serving as well for the passage of the King's Army as for the trade and commerce of his people yet were none of them either marks of Tenure or of Feodal service as appeareth by that we have formerly shew'd and by the testimony of these Charters where to use the words of Edw the Confessor in that to Thola it is said that they are Omnibus hominibus communia a common burthen to all men as belonging to the safety and sacred anchor both of the Kingdom and Common-wealth The Saxons therefore did not call them services or Feodal duties as things that lay upon the person of the owner but landirecta rights that charg'd the very land whosoever did possess it Church or Lay man And these duties were ordinarily excepted in every Charter not for that they should otherwise be extinguished but per superabundantem cautelam lest the general words precedent should be mistaken to involve them and to release that which the King could not release For tho' Ethelbald by his Charter to the Monks of Croyland did give the site of that Monastery with the appendancies c. libera soluta ab omni onere seculari in perpetuam elâ—emosynam yet in his Charter of priviledges granted to all Churches and Monasteries of his Kingdom speaking of the repairing of Castles and Bridges he confesseth and saith that Nulli unquam relaxari possunt And I suppose that the word Expedition was here omitted by the negligence of the Scribe for I never find it severed from repairing of Castles and Bridges in any other Charter And also tho' King Ethelwulf by his memorable Charter of priviledges ratified by the great Council of Winchester in the year 855. did by express words free Sanctam Ecclesiam that is all the Churches and Monasteries of his Kingdom ab Expeditione pontis extructione arcis munitione yet the whole Clergy about the year 868. did notwithstanding voluntarily assist his son Beorredus against the Danes with all the power they could as appeareth by the Charter of the same Beorredus CHAP. XI More touching the freedom of Thane-land out of Doomsday THo' that which is delivered in these Charters be authentical and need no farther proof yet to convince broad spreading errors the more manifestly it will not be unnecessary to shew what Doomsday it self relateth to confirm it For whereas lands holden in Capite and by Knights-service could not otherwise be disposed than by licence of the King or Superior Lord Doomsday sheweth that the Thane-lands might be used and disposed at the pleasure of the owner without impeachment
of any other For at Ebsa in Suthry under the title of Ric. fil Comitis Gisleberti it saith Hanc terram tenuerunt novem Teigni cum ea poterant utere quo volebant Plain Latin but the sense is That nine Thanes held this land of Ebsam in the time of Edward the Confessor and might do with it what they would So at Est-Burnham in Buckinghamshire under the title of Milo Crispin Duo Teigni homines Brictrici hanc terram tenuerunt vendere potuere and here it seemeth that these Thanes were not the Kings Thanes but of the lesser sort for that he calleth them homines Brictrici So in the same Shire under the title of S. Petr. Westmon it is said of the same Town of Est-Burnham Hoc manerium tres Treigni Tempore Regis Edwardi tenuerunt vendere potuerunt It there also appeareth that the Thane-land might be charg'd with a rent issuing out of it for it immediately followeth tamen ipsi tres reddiderunt quinque oras de consuetudine And it might be restrain'd from alienation as where it is said in Doomsday De ea viz. Lega Pelton sunt in dominio duae hidae una ex hiis fuit Tainland non tamen poterat ab Ecclesia separari Where the word tamen implyeth that altho' Thane-lands might otherwise be alienated yet this particularly could not So likewise might it be entailed upon a Family as appeareth in the laws of Alured Cap. 37. But thus Doomsday after the Conquest affirmeth the same that the Charters did before the Conquest And the words both in the one and the other which shew that the Thane might sell or use this land as he would do imply an estate of inheritance independant of any Lord either feodal or superior and was as even the Alodium mentioned in the Chapter of Thanes but whether it were descendable only upon the eldest son or dividable between all the sons as in Gavelkind I cannot say but the formula of Alodium join'd with Marculfus doth divide it between them all CHAP. XII The fruits of Feodal Tenures and that they were not sound among the Saxons or not after our manner HItherto we have sought our Tenures among the Saxons and have not found them tho' the Report telleth us It is most manifest that they were frequent and common in the times of the Saxons We will now follow the direction of our Saviour and see if by the fruit we can find the tree The Report saith by question and answer The fruits of the Tenure viz. in Capite and Knights-service what are they but the 1 Profits of the lands 2 Wardship 3 Livery 4 Primier seisin 5 Relief mistaken to be an Heriot 6 Fine for alienation and the rest Which rest it supplyeth shortly after to be 7 Homage 8 Fealty 9 Escuage Adding again Relief and Wardship instead whereof I out of a third passage do place 10 Escheats And it concludeth that As all these tenures were common in those times so were all the fruits of them c. Which if it be true the question is determined nay I yield it if any one of them agreeing directly with our Tenures be found amongst them some shew of Fealty and Licence to alien lands granted for a certain time only excepted for avoiding captious disputation Their very names pretend no Saxon antiquity but as the Ephramites bewrayed their Tribe by their Language so by their names these fruits discover themselves to be of Norman progeny And the Report doth not give us one instance or example of any of them in all the Saxon times If it did the words before mention'd in the Charters to the Thanes declaring that their land must be libera ab omni seculari gravedine c. sweep all away at once as the West-wind did the Grashoppers in Egypt and do make the Thane-lands to have the priviledge of Alodium here before mention'd to belong unto them that is to be free from all tenure and service It is true notwithstanding that both the greater and lesser-Thanes might have and had other lands besides these that were hereditary of feudal nature and holden by military service as in the Charter of Oswald the Bishop shall after appear but they holding them like Folcland only at the will of the Lord whether King or other or for certain years or at most for life or lives their Tenure and Feuds determin'd with the will of the Lord the term of years or estate for life And then could not any of the fruits before spoken of accrue unto the Lord that granted the land for that it forthwith reverted intirely into his own hands and was to be kept and dispos'd a-new as pleas'd him It is apparent therefore by this general demonstration that the fruits we speak of could not arise out of either of the Thane-lands were they temporary or hereditary if not haply fealty or some gratuity to the Lord for licence that the temporary Tenant might assign his interest or have it enlarg'd things proper as well to Socage and Folcland as to Feudal But let us examine all these fruits particularly and see whether and how we find any of them among the Saxons and give me leave herein to produce them in such order tho' not logical as the Report presenteth them to the Reader in their several places CHAP. XIII No profit of Land by Wardship in the Saxons time AS for the profits of the land which the King hath now during the minority of a Ward it is manifest that the Kings then had no such of the Thane-lands for that the Thane had this particular priviledge that when he dy'd he might make his Will of his own lands as it formerly appeareth and give them unto whom he would which was never lawful after the coming of the Normans for any Baron or Tenant by Knight-service to do till the statute 32. Hen. VIII Cap. 1. gave free liberty to all men to devise all Socage-land by their last Will in writing and no more than two parts only of land holden in Capite or by Knight-service least it should hinder the Lords too much of their Feodal profits And Socage-lands were therefore long before devisable in many Burroughs for that thereby the Lord sustain'd no such prejudice But to conclude this point in one word it shall I hope be made manifest in the next Chapter that there were no Wardships amongst the Saxons and thereupon it will follow invincibly there could be then no profits of lands arising to the King or Lords by title of Wardship CHAP. XIV No Wardship in England amongst the Saxons Objections answered IN following the Report I must now speak de causa post causatum of Wardship after the Profits of land growing by it This being the chiefest fruit of all feodal servitudes and the root from whence many branches of like grievances take their original the Report laboureth more to prove it to
filiam cujusdam viri Vlfi quem concupiverat maritali sibi foedere copulare Here it appeareth that the King's Licence or good will was sought but the reason appeareth not The good will of King Solomon was sought that Abishag might be given to Adoniah for his wife but not in respect of Tenure in either case It is an express law of King Canutus Ll. 72. ne nyde man naðer ƿif ne maeden c. That no man should constrain either woman or maid to marry otherwise than where they will nor shall take any mony for them unless by way of thankfulness some do give somewhat If these passages carry any shew of Wardship I must still let you know that Knights Fees were not at this time descendable unto Women by the Feudal law no nor long after when they were become hereditary in the masculine line Ne à Lancea ad fusum haereditas pertransiret as you may see by Cujacius in feud Lib. 1. Tit. 1. The first law that I meet with touching Feudal marriages is in Magna Charta Libertatum Hen. I. yet is there nothing spoken of marrying the heir male of the Kings Tenant within age And touching the female issue it is only provided that the King should be so far acquainted with their marriage as that he might be assur'd they should not marry with his enemies lest the feuds or feifs which were given for service against them should by this occasion be transferr'd to them Hear the words of the Charter Et si quis Baronum meorum vel aliorum hominum meorum siliam suam nuptui tradere voluerit sive sororem suam sive neptem sive cognatam mecum inde loquatur sed nec ego aliquid de suo pro hac licentia accipiam nec defendam ei quin eam det excepto si eam velit jungere meo inimico Et si mortuo Barone vel alio homine meo filia haeres remanserit sine liberis fuerit dotem suam maritationem habebit eam non dabo marito nisi secundum velle suum c. Ordaining that the Wife shall be Guardian of the Childrens lands or some near kinsman qui justus esse debet and that other Lords observe the like courses touching their Wards Thus among the Normans but I don't find in all the Feodal law of these times any thing sounding to this purpose nor any mention of Marriage or Wardship of the body or lands I take them therefore to have risen from the Normans a little before their coming into England but in a diverse manner according to the diversity of the places and the moderate or covetous disposition of the Lords For it seemeth that tho' the profits of the land belong'd wholly to the Lord and were therefore ordinarily so taken by him yet some of the Lords deducting only the charge of Education of the Ward and just allowances restor'd him his lands at full age with the surplusage upon accompt And the Grantee of a Wardship from the King was in Normandy tyed to do it as appeareth by the 215. Artic. of the reformed Customes for otherwise they were not Guardians properly and Tutores rei pupillaris but fructuarii rather and suum promoventes commodum See the Comment to that Article So in point of Feodal marriage it seemeth that the Charter of Henry I. was grounded upon the Norman Custom which tho it required the consent of the Lord in tendring of Marriage to Women for the reason aforesaid yet did it not permit either him or the kindred or friends whom they called the parents to make it venal or to take any thing for the same as you may see by divers passages there and by a case adjudged in the Comment to the 228. Article where the Tutor or Guardian and the Parents and Friends thus offending are all condemn'd to pay costs and damages And note that according to the Norman custom the consent of the Parents viz. the next kindred and friends was as requisite as the consent of the Lord or Tutor which as I conceive gave the occasion of the words Si parentes conquerantur in the Statute of Merton as in respect of the ancient right they had in consenting to the Marriage And insomuch as we don't find that the various usages touching Wardship and Marriage were compos'd into an uniform law till Magna Charta Henr. III. did determine it it may be conceiv'd to have been the reason that Rand. Higden before mention'd and our other Authors did ascribe this part of our Feodal Law to be introduced by Henry III. But it is manifest by Glanvil that it was in use in Henry II's time and by the Charter of Henry I. to have been so likewise under William Rufus yet is there nothing hitherto any way produc'd to bring it from the Saxons or to shew it to have been in use amongst them CHAP. XVI No Livery no Primer Seisin IF the King's Tenant in capite or by Knight-service dieth the King shall have his lands till the heir hath done homage which if he be of full age he may do presently but if he be under age the land must continue in the King's hands till his full age And when either the one or the other sueth to have it out of the King's hands his obtaining it is called Livery and the profits receiv'd in the mean time by the King are call'd his Primer Seisin But neither of these could be among the Saxons for that their hereditary lands were not Feodal but libera ab omni gravedine as before we have shew'd And their temporary lands could not be subject to it for that their Estate extended no farther then to a Franck Tenement And neither the one or the other was then tyed to do Homage as shall appear when we speak of Homage After the coming of the Normans they were presently afoot amongst us even in William Rufus's days but uncertain and irregular which was a certain note of their novelty and that Feuds hereditary were new begun The great Charter of Liberties granted by Henry I. implyeth as much where to moderate them the King saith thus Si quis Baronum meorum seu Comitum sive aliorum qui de me tenent mortuus fuerit haeres suus non redimet terram suam sicut faciebat tempore fratris mei sed legitima justa relevatione relevabit eam Similiter homines Baronum meorum justa legitima relevatione relevabunt terras suas de Dominis suis I take this redeeming of the land out of the King's hands to be a Composition for his Primer Seisin and for the Livery and Relief things uncertain at this time even in their Norman appellations and not likely therefore to be known unto the Saxons CHAP. XVII That Reliefs whereon the Report most relyeth were not in use among the Saxons nor like their Heriots OF all the Feodal profits alledged in the Report to be receiv'd
that succeeded and out of his purse The Heriot whether the son or heir enjoy'd the land or not the Relief by none but him only that obtain'd the land in succession The Heriot whether the land were fallen into the Lord's hands or not the Relief in old time not unless it were fallen and lay destitute of a Tenant whose taking of it up out of the Lord's hands was in that sense called Relevium or Relevatio a taking up of that was fallen according to the French word Reliefe Bracton well observ'd the difference saying Fit quaedam praestatio quae non dicitur Relevium sed quasi sicut Heriotum quasi loco Relevii quod dari debet aliquando ante sacramentum fidelitatis aliquando post Hotoman saith Relevium dicitur honorarium munus quod novus Vassallus Patrono introitus causa largitur quasi morte alterius Vassalli vel alio quo casu feudum ceciderit quod jam à novo sublevetur Nov. Leo. 13. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nominat I stand the longer herein for that not only the Report but even Doomsday it self and generally all the ancient Monkish writers have confounded Heriots and Releifs Yet might I have saved all this labour for nothing can make the difference more manifest than that we often see both of them are together issuing out of the same land But when all is done neither is Heriot nor Releif any badge of land holden by Knight's-service or in Capite for both of them are found in lands of ordinary Socage Yet I confess that Bracton saith de soccagio non datur Relevium and a little before de soccagio non competit domino Capitali Custodia nec homagium ubi nulla Custodia nullum Relevium sed è contra But this serveth my turn very well for that they in the Report having fail'd to prove that Releifs were in use in the Saxons time whereof they affirm'd they had full testimony it now inferreth on my behalf that if Releifs and Wardships were not in use among the Saxons that then also Tenure by Knight-service was not with them Besides all this the Heriot was a certain duty and settled by Law the Relief so various and uncertain as the Lords exacted what they listed for it when it fell into their hands constraining the heir of the Tenant as it were to make a new purchase of their Feud whereupon the Feudists called this Releif not only Renovatio and Restauratio feudi in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 turning or bringing back of the Feud to the former condition or proper nature of it but also Redemptio a ransoming of it out of the Lord's hands That it thus stood with us in England by and by after the Conquest appears by that we have shewed before out of the Magna Charta of Henry I. CHAP. XIX No Fines for Licence of Alienation TOuching Fines for Licence of Alienation it is not said what kind of Tenants among the Saxons did pay them nor for what kind of land they were paid The Thane-land hereditary is apparently discharg'd thereof by the ordinary words of their Charters before mention'd where 't is said that the owners of lands may give and bequeath them cuicunque voluerint and that freely ab omni munduali obstaculo Doomsday also as we here shewed doth testifie as much and so doth the very word Alodium which the ancient Authors attribute to these lands So that the Thane-lands doubtless were free both from the Fine and Licence But as touching Folcland and land holden at will of the Lord tho' continued in ancient time to their children after the manner of Copy-holds it is no question but that they might both have Licence for aliening such lands and also pay consideration for it as our Copy-holders do at this day I find that one Brictrick in the time of King Etheldred about the year 984. bequeath'd legacies of good value unto his Lord's wife to intreat her Husband that this Brictrick's Will whereby he had devised many lands and goods to Monasteries and divers men might stand And that Thola the widow of Vrke a Thane of Edward the Confessor obtain'd licence from the same King Edward that she might devise both her lands and goods to the Monastery of Abbotsbury But of what nature these Licences were whether to alienate the land or to make a Will or to give the land to Monasteries as in Mortmain I cannot determine If they only intended alienation then I understand them only of Lands holden according to the custom of the time at will of the Lord or Folcland Yet in that Thola's Licence was as well to bequeath her goods expresly as her lands the Licence seemeth to be given therefore to make a Will which no man then could do if not a Thane Quaere But howsoever it be expounded it must not be extended to the Thane-lands or land hereditary for the reasons before alledged And as touching Fines for Licence of Alienation after our manner which the Report suggesteth they could not doubtless be in use among the Saxons for there are not found as I suppose here among us before the time of Edward I. and not established afterwards 'till 1. Edw. III. where the King granteth that from thenceforth lands holden in Chiefe should not be seized as forfeited which formerly they were for Alienation without Licence but that a reasonable Fine should be taken for the same See the Statute CHAP. XX. No Feodal Homage among the Saxons OUr word Man and homo in Latin have for many ages in old time been used by the German and Western Nations for a Servant or Vassal And from thence hominium and vassaticum afterwards homagium was likewise used for hominem agere to do the office or duty of a servant not to signifie Manhood as some expound it and so also Vassalagium But by little and little all these latter words have been restrain'd to note no more than our ceremonial homage belonging properly unto Tenures which I met not with among our Saxons nor any shew thereof in former ages unless we shall fancy that the Devil had it in his eye when he offered to give unto our Saviour all the Kingdoms of the world if he would fall down and worship him For here he maketh himself as Capital Lord our Saviour as the Feodal Tenant the Kingdoms of the world to be the Feud the falling or kneeling down to be the homage and the worshipping of him consisting as the Feodists expound it in six rules of service to be the Fealty Pardon me this idleness but from such missemblances rise many errors Homage as we understand it in our Law is of two sorts one more ancient than the other called homagium ligeum as due unto the King in respect of Soveraignty and so done more Francico to King Pipin by Tassilo Duke of Bavaria about the year 756. The other homagium feodale or praediale belonging to
very Charters of the Saxon Kings themselves should stand together viz. That their Thanelands should be liberae ab omni seculari gravedine and yet be subject to that which of all other was most grievous viz. our Knights-service in Capite It may be answered as the Report in another place delivereth positively That Tenure in Capite cannot be transferred or extinct by release or grant for it is an incident inseparably annexed to the Crown The answer were good if once they had made it appear that both this Tenure and this Law were in force in the Saxons time There is nothing shew'd to prove that suggestion and were it true I should desire no better argument on my behalf than what the place it self bringeth with it For if Thaneland were converted into Reveland and that Reveland signify Socage-land then it is as manifest as the Sun that Tainland did not signify land holden by Knights-service in Capite for if it did then could it not decline into Socage-Tenure as their own Maxime doth demonstrate If there be a cloud before this Sun I shall remove it also My Lord Coke citing this place out of Doomsday noteth in the margin Herefordsâ— but delivereth both the title and the text by halfs The title is Hereford Rex the text thus Haec terra fuit tempore Edwardi Regis Tainland sed postea conversa est in Reveland Et idem dicunt legati Regis quod ipsa terra census qui inde exit furtim aufertur Regi The very title discovers the Tenure for if it be Terra Regis as the word Rex declareth it then it is plainly Ancient Demesne and every Lawyer will tell us that in ancient Demesne there was no Tenure by Knights-service but wholly in Socage So that this cloud now vanisheth into the air and our Tainland is clearly discovered to be but Socage I shall speak more of it afterwards But what construction shall we now find for the words in Doomsday Tainland conversa est in Reveland Hoc opus hic labor est It is sufficient for me to have quit my self of the objection they must seek some new interpretation Yet will I help them what I can in that also I suppose that the land which is here said to have been Thaneland T. E. R. and after converted into Reveland was such land as being reverted to the King after the death of his Thane who had it for life was not since granted out to any by the King but rested in charge upon the account of the Reve or Bailiff of the Mannour who as it seemeth being in this Lordship of Hereford like the Reve in Chaucer a false brother concealed the land from the Auditor and kept the profit of it to himself till the Surveiors who are here called Legati Regis discovered this falsehood and presented to the King that furtim aufertur Regi as by the words in the latter part of the paragraph which my Lord Coke reciteth appeareth Besides all this why should the coming of these lands into the Reve's accompt alter the nature of the Tenure seeing all men know that the Reves and Bailiffs of Mannours govern and dispose the lands thereof as well which are holden by Knights-service as those in Socage As for the old French MS. Custumary which they affirm doth mention Tenures by Knights-service long before the Saxons even in the time of the Britains I doubt not but there may be such a passage in it for the Law which they ascribe to Edward the Confessour for proving Feuds to be in use in his time affirmeth also that the Laws Dignities Liberties c. of the City of London were at that day the same which were in Old Great Troy But as they in the Report wave the one so I take them both for Romances and pass them over as not worth an answer Having thus particularly answered every argument inference and objection produced in the Report to prove our Feuds and Form of Tenures to have been in use amongst our Saxons I shall now conclude that it neither was nor could be so unless we shall assume that our poor illiterate Saxons in a corner of the World were the Authors of the Feodal Law and gave the precedent thereof to the Germans Longobards French Italians and the Empire For in none of these was it otherwise extant till about the end of our Saxon Monarchy then by such budds and branches as we formerly have expressed out of Caesar Tacitus and some other CHAP. XXV How the Saxons held their Lands and what obliged them to so many kinds of Services IT cometh now in question how the Saxons held their lands and what obliged them to that multitude of services which lay upon them both in war and peace As for Tenures I still say that they had not the name in use among them yet like the Jews the Greeks the Romans and other ancient Nations a multitude of services whereof some were personal and some praedial Personal services were those which a man did for his person or personal Estate either generally to the King and Common-wealth in publick occasions as in the Trinodi necessitate c. or particularly to his own Lord upon particular agreement between them like the Commendati before mentioned and some ministerial Officers and domestick servants Praedial service was that which was done after the same manner to the King or his Lord for land only and this was of three sorts Alodial Beneficiary and Colonical Alodial service was that which the Greater Thanes and other who had Alodial land otherwise called Bocland and as I take it Gavelkind and Hereditary land were tyed to do pro bono publico to the King and Common-wealth in respect of those Lands tho' by the Feudal law that kind of land was free from all Tenure and Feodal service I should not therefore use this solecism to call them services if the Dialect of our Law afforded me some other fit expression but the Saxons themselves term'd them Land-rights not services of which sort were the Trinodis necessitas of Expedition Burghbote and Brigbote the guarding of the sea and of the peace attendance upon the King's summons for his Park or Palace before expressed and besides them all the Tribute of Danegelt c. Beneficiary services were those which were done by the midling or lesser Thanes to the King and the greater Thanes either militarily in war or ministerially in peace for those portions of Out-land which being granted to them temporarily as at will of the Lord or for life or lives were then called Beneficia but being extended after to perpetuity they were named by the Normans Feoda The Creation manner variety and multitude of them you shall see in the Charter of Bishop Oswald by and by ensuing Colonical services were those which were done by the Ceorls and Socmen that is Husbandmen to their Lords the King and Thanes of all sorts
times and that they were not made otherwise than for life or three lives for so I find them in the Abby-books And I also suppose that they to whom these lands were granted were the Thani Episcopi Thani Ecclesiae spoken of in Doomsday-book and that the lands themselves were such as in the same book are usually called thain-Thain-lands Ecclesiae Episcopi and Abbatis But I see they were laden with many services which the lands of the King's Thane in respect of his dignity and person were free from Therefore when this very Bishop by another Charter granted tres cassatas three hydes of land in Cungle cuidam Ministro Regis to one of the King's Thanes nam'd Alfwold and to his Mother if she surviv'd during their lives he put no service upon the King's Thane but saith plena glorietur libertate excepta expeditione rata Pontis arcisve constructione the common exception in grants unto the Kings Thanes as before appeareth and yet the services thereby excepted belonged not either to the Bishop or the King himself otherwise than pro bono publico and common necessity After all this I beat still upon the old string that here yet is nothing to prove Wardship or Marriage or as the law then stood a Tenure by Knights-service for we have made it manifest that Expedition and building of Castles and Bridges were no Feodal services nor grew by Tenure And as for these that were tyed to ride and go up and down with their Lord Baraterius an old Feudist saith that a Knights fee may be given so ut Vassallus in diebus Festivis cum uxore Domini ad Ecclesiam vadat and the feudal law it self inferreth as much Lib. 2. Tit. 3. But our Bracton speaking of our Law here in England de Invest feud in his time touching such Tenants calleth them Rodknights alias Radknights Lib. 2. Cap. 35. nu 6. ut siquis debeat equitare cum Domino suo de Manerio in Manerium and saith not that it is Knight-service but that it is a Serjantie and that although such sometimes do Homage yet the Lord shall not have Ward and Marriage Admit notwithstanding that it were Knight-service and that the lands thus holden were Knights Fees during the life of the Tenant yet where is the Wardship Marriage and Releif Who shall undergo these servitudes since the Tenure and all the services are determin'd with the life of the Tenant CHAP. XXVII Inducements to the Conclusion SEeing then that neither the greater Thanes nor the lesser Thanes among the Saxons were subject to the rules of our Knight-service upon whom then if it were in use among them did it lye For as touching the Clergy it is said in the Laws of Edw. the Confessor cap. 11. that the King and the people magis in Ecclesiae confidebant Orationibus quam in Armorum defensionibus And the Report it self confesseth pag. 3. in pede That the possessions of Bishops and Abbots were first made subject to Knight-service in Capite by William the Conqueror in the fourth year of his reign for their lands were held in the times of the Saxons In pura libera eleemosyna free ab omni servitio seculari c. Though this be not true in the latter part being strictly taken for no doubt their lands were subject to the Trinodi necessitati viz. Expeditioni pontis arcisque constructioni as before appeareth yet cometh it very fitly to my purpose for hereby it is evident that if the Trinodis necessitas made no Tenure by Knight-service or in Capite in the Church Lands then neither did it in the Thane-lands as before we have shew'd and then much less in the land of Churles and Husbandmen commonly call'd the Socmanni for it is agreed on all hands that their lands were holden no otherwise than by Socage Therefore if all Kent in the Saxon's time were Gavelkind then could there be no Tenures by Knight-service in all that County For Glanvil Lib. 7. c. 3. telleth us That where the inheritance is divideable among the sons it is Socage And his reason is because that where 't is holden by Knight-service the Primogenitus succedit in toto This Kentish custom was ab initio the general Law of England and of all Nations Jews Greeks Romans and the rest and so continueth even till this day where the Feodal Law hath not altered it which first happen'd here in England when the Normans introducing their Feuds settled the whole inheritance of them upon the eldest son which the ancient Feodal Law it self did not as we before have noted till Feuds were grown perpetual The reason as I take it that begat this alteration was for that while the Feud did descend in Gavelkind to the Sons and Nephews of the Feodatorie the services were suspended till the Lord had chosen which of the Sons he would have for his Tenant and then it was uncertain whether the party chosen would accept of the Feud or not for sometimes there might be reasons to refuse it To return where I left it makes to the proof of all this that has been said and for conclusion seems to be unanswerable that the old inheritance which in the Saxons time belong'd to the Crown called in Doomsday Terra Regis and in the Law books Antient Demesne containing a great part of every County had not any Lands within it or within any Mannor thereof holden by Knight-service For Fitz-Herbert saith that Nul terres sont antient demesne forsque terres tenus en Socage And therefore if the Tenant in ancient Demesne will claim to hold of the Lord by Knights-service it is good cause to remove the Plea because that no Lands holden of a Mannor which is antient Demesne are holden by other services of the Lord than by Socage for the Tenants in antient Demesne are call'd Socmanni that is to say Tenants del carve Angl. le plough Thus far Fitz-Herbert Now if in the Mannors of the King himself there were then no Lands holden by Knight-service throughout all England it will then in all probability follow that there were none likewise among his Subjects in the Saxons time and consequently that our Feudal Law was not introduc'd before the Conquest Mr. Cambden by their own confession is of the same opinion and Mr. Selden himself whom they alledge against me is clearly with me as before I have shew'd If these our three opinions avail nothing we have yet a fourth to strengthen us great Bracton the most learned in our ancient Laws and Customs that hath been in this Kingdom who speaking of Forinsecum servitium as the Genus to these Tenures saith Lib. 2. cap. 16. Nu. 7. fol. 36. a. that it was call'd regale servitium quia spectat ad Dominum Regem non ad alium secundum quod in Conquestu fuit adinventum Here Bracton also refers the Invention to the Conquest but the Report waveth his opinion as well as ours notwithstanding
another as it is to be seen in France it self When the Roman Emperors grew potent in Germany and the German Princes came to be Emperors the Germans generally forsook their ancient custom spoken of by Tacitus and received the Roman Law The rest of the Angli that remained in Germany and came not over into England made a Law about the year of our Lord 900. That it should be lawful for a Free-man to dispose his inheritance by Will as he pleased The Normans kept the old custom in part and left it in the other part They suffered him that had neither wife nor children if he were twenty year old to make a Will and bequeath his moveable goods as he listed either to or from his kindred So likewise if he were married and his wife dead Having children he could dispose but of a third part And so might man or woman of 16. years old But land which they according to the Civilians called immoveable goods no man amongst them might dispose of by his Will In some other parts of France as in Champain they disposed both moveable and immoveable that is goods and lands according to the Civil Law The Civil Law custom they called Lex Romana the other Lex Barbara Our Saxon Ancestors by direction of their Clergy who chiefly affected the Roman manners seem also to have observed the Civil Law in making of Wills both in substance for disposing Lands and Goods and much in the form and ceremony of making and publishing the same As Carolus Magnus in France disposed the Lands of his great dominions between his three sons Lewis Pepin and Charles by his last Will. So by his example King Ethelwulfus here divided his Lands by his Will between his three sons Aethelbald Aethelred and Aelfred King Aelfred in the like manner disposed both his Lands and Goods by his Will now extant And many other Saxons by their Wills in writing bequeathed Lands and Goods with their Bodies unto Monasteries That herein they followed the Civil Law is manifest by the Saxon Will of Birtrick and Elfâ—uith his wife made about the year 980. according to the manner of that time by them both jointly First it seemeth to be made in calatis Comitiis that is in an assembly called together for that purpose Then whereas the Civil Law requireth necessarily VII witnesses here were a dozen least it might be defective in that one was a woman and some other under age or Bond-men The disposition of Lands as well as of Goods is by the Civil Law and therefore the course is more solemn Which also this well observeth both for disposing Land and Goods and also for the solemnity of the course But most evidently it appeareth to be according to the Civil Law in that the man and his wife joyn both together in it which was neither in use nor resolv'd to be good till the Novel Constitution of Theodosius and Valentinian did authorise it After this Constitution that kind of Testament became so common that Marculfus who lived about the year 660. hath left unto us an especial formula or precedent of it as it was then in use in France And saith in it that it was ut Romanae Legis decrevit authoritas And concludeth it with an imprecation or curse against such as should violate it as doth also the Will of Birtrick With the like solemnity of witnesses eight in number besides a Lady did Elfere another Saxon before Birtrick bequeath the Town or Land of Snodland to the Church of S. Andrews Of the Probate of Wills or Testaments After the Will was thus composed the Roman use was to have the Testator and Witnesses to subscribe it then binding it up close with thred to seal it with their Seals which upon producing of it they or many of them were to view and acknowledge before the Praetor or Judge And then rupto lino the thred being cut it was opened and published and copies of it delivered to the parties under a Publick Seal the Original remaining in the publick Register The ancient manner of opening publishing or as we call it proving of Wills before the Magister Census is described by John Fabri But nearer to our purpose is that in the Formulae of Marculfus of a Will proved in a City or Corporation before the Magistrate there or of a Town before the Defensor Plebis For a Will by the Civil Law and the use of our neighbour Nations might be proved before divers Officers and in divers places We already mentioned the Praetor but Justiman the Emperor ordained that in Rome none should be opened save by the Magister Census In the Provinces by a Constitution of Theodosius the Rectores Provinciarum and where the access to them was uneasy there Donations and Wills made in Cities and Corporations might be exhibited and proved before Magistratus Municipales the Magistrates there in other Towns before the Defensor Plebis According to these two last are the formulae of Marculfus and another in Brissonius From these Constitutions of the Emperors grew the various manner of Probate of Wills amongst us in ancient time With the Magister Census being proper only to the City of Rome we have nothing to do But as we were once a Province of the Empire so our Ancestors received and held the manner of Provinces For the Rectores Provinciarum which with us were the Earls of the Counties had the cognisance or Probation of Wills as shall by and by appear So also had divers of our Magistratus Municipales Magistrates of Cities and Corporations As that which I am best acquainted with my Neighbours of Lenn Episcopi now Kings Lynn in Norfolk And instead of the Defensores Plebis in an ordinary Town the Lord of the Town or Mannor both had and hath that priviledge with us in divers places All this while there is no mention of any Ecclesiastical Person which we must now look into The fourth Council of Carthage ordained that Episcopus tuitionem testamentorum non suscipiat and this Canon Gratian has taken into the Body of the Canon Law whereto the Gloss saith Tuitionem id est apertionem sc coram eo non apperiantur sed coram Magistro Census C. de testam L. Consulta And tho' it addeth vel dicatur quod non sit advocatus ad tuendum testamentum yet that seemeth an idle interpretation for tho' Epiphanius maketh mention that Bishops in old time judged Causes yet it was never known that they pleaded Causes But it is apparent that the Clergy-men in those days took upon them to prove Wills even in Justinian's time who flourished An. Dom. 530. And therefore he prohibited them not only by a Constitution but also by a mulct of 50. pound weight of Gold saying Absurdum est namque si promiscuis actibus rerum turbentur officia
Surrey 23. King Edgar's Charter of donation of certain Thane-lands 19. Another Charter granted by him to the Monastery of Hide near Winchester 20. By whose advice his Laws were made 61. King Edward the elder how he propos'd his Laws 61. The first that prohibited Law business on Festivals 77. King Edward the Confessor's Charter of donation to Thola 20. Several priviledges granted to the Cinque-Ports 26. His Laws by whom collected 61. His Constitution touching Festivals 79. Edward Earl of Norfolk and Marshal of England 168. Dyed in his minority ibid. Edwin son of Othulf gave certain lands to Arch-bishop Odo 29. Elfere a Saxon bequeath'd Snodland to the Church of St. Andrews 128. Publish'd his Will before Odo Arch-bishop of Canterbury c. 130. Elfstane Bishop of Rochester 130. Elfsy Priest of Croyden 130. Ellingham 161. Elmham 150. Erpingham 151. Erpingham Tho. Commissioner for executing the Office of Earl Marshal of England 169. Escheats the signification of the word 37. No feodal Escheats among the Saxons 37 38. Escuage what in the Empire 36. Neither its name nor rules us'd by the Saxons 37. Essoyning the manner of it not in use before the Conquest 27. King Ethelbald's Charter to the Monks of Croyland 22. Ethelbert the first Christian King of the Saxons 8. He causes his Laws to be put in writing ibid. He took somewhat from the Roman law 102 Etheldreda daughter of K. Alfred her dowry 8. King Etheldred ordain'd every eight Hides of land to find a man for the naval Expedition 17. His Charter of donation to Aethelwold 19. Another Charter granted by him to his Thane Sealwyne ibid. King Ethelstane whom he consulted in making his Laws 61. King Ethelwulfs Charter of priviledges 23. He divided his lands by Will among his three sons 128. Euricus King of the Goths 102. Exauctoratio Militis 185. Expeditio what it signifies in Latin 17. F Fakenham 150. Fasti or Law days among the Romans why so nam d. 72. Seldom two Fasti together 75. Fasti proprie ibid. Fasti intercisi ibid. Fasti Comitiales ibid. All the Fasti not apply'd to Judicature ibid. Fealty the definition of it 35. No Fealty but for a fee. 36. What manner of Fealty among the Saxons ibid. Felbrig 152. Felewell 161. Feodal words none among the Saxons 7 8 9. Feorme what it signifies in the Saxon tongue 15 Ferdwite 37. Festa majora vel principalia 91. Festivals how exempted from Law days 76. The differences of them 91. The Festivals of St. Peter and Paul 92. Of St. George 93. Of Gun-powder Treason ibid. A Feud what it is 1. It s general and particular definition 2. Feuds among the Jews ibid. Among the Gauls 3 Their original 4. Made perpetual and hereditary 5. When and how they became so ibid. Especially in England ibid. The difference between them and Benefices 6 9. The great growth of them ibid. No proper Feuds before the Conquest ibid. Feudal-law generally receiv'd in every Kingdom 5. It s youth infancy and full age 9. Where it had its original ibid. Feudatarii 9. Feudum militare nobile 4. Rusticum ignobile ibid. Feuda majora regalia ibid. The word Feudum or Feodum not us'd in K. Beorredus's days 9. Fideles who 4. Fidelity what 59. Fines for Licence of alienation 33. The Thane-lands free from them ibid. Not in use among the Saxons 34. Fitz-Alan Jo. Lord Maltravers Marshal of England 168. Fitz-Osborn Will. Lord Marshal to King William the Conquerour 165. Flegg 154. Flitcham 145. Flitchamburrough 52 145. Folcland what 12. Not alienated without licence 33 34. Free from homage 35. Ford-Park 110. Forests belong to the King alone 118. Subjects can have 'em only in custody ibid. Fouldage 162. Franc-almoin 2 7. Frank-tenements 12. Freeborgs or Tithings 51. Frekenham 153. G Garbulsham 158. Gavelkind what and why so call'd 12. Observ'd throughout all Kent 43. At first the general Law of all Nations ibid. Germans their Customs and Tenures carry'd into several Countries 5. They receiv'd the Roman Law 127. Gey-wood 143. Gilbert the third son of William the King's Marshal 166. Made Marshal of England ibid. Kill'd in a Tournament ibid. Gimmingham 152. Goths carry the German Laws into Spain Greece c. 5. They were the first that put their Laws in writing 102. Trusted Priests with the passing of wills 130 Government the ancient Government of England 49. c. 53. Grand-days in France and England 92. Grand Serjeanty 2. Grantesmale Hugh Marshal under K. William I. 165. Greeks from whom they had much of their ancient Rites 74 127. Gresham 152. Gressenhall 150. Grey Rad. de exauctoratur 185. Guthrun the Dane 61 77. H Hales 156. Harkela Andr. de exauctoratur 185. Harleston ibid. Hartlebury-park 110. Hawkins Pet Keeper of Bramsil-park wounded by Arch-bishop Abbot 109 c. Hengham 157. King Henry I. imprison'd the Bishop of Durham 62. His Constitution about Festivals and Law-days 81. King Henry II. ratify'd the Laws of Edw. the Confess and Will the Conquerour 81. Henry Bishop of Winchester conven'd K. Stephen to his Synod 132. Heribannum what 17. Heriots paid after the death of great Men. 31 32 To whom forgiven 32. The difference between them and Reliefs 32 33. By whom and when first ordain'd 32. What the word Heriot signifies ibid. Heriots and Reliefs issuing out of the same lands 33. No badge of lands held by Knight-service ibid. Heydon 151. High Courts see Court of Justice Hikifricus Pugil quidam Norfolciensis 138. Hilary-Term its ancient bounds 82 83. The end of it sometimes held in Septuagesima 95. Hockwold 161. Holkham 149. Holland Tho Marshal of England 168. Holland Tho. Earl of Kent Duke of Norfolk 169. Made Earl Marshal of England ibid. Holland Tho. Farl Marshal of England during the minority of John Mowbray 165. Holme in Norfolk 147 152 Homage by whom first instituted 5. Feodal homage 34. Of two sorts ibid. When begun in France and England ibid. The reason of it 34 35. Who are to do it 35. Usual in Soccage-tenure 35. As well a personal as a praedial duty ibid. Homines commendati 35. Hominium homagium what 34. Homagium ligeum ibid Feodale aut praediale ibid. Hoveden Roger when he wrote 31. Howard Sir John Kt. created Duke of Norfolk and Earl Marshal of England 17â— Slain in Bosworth-field ibid. Howard Tho. the son of the former Earl of Surrey 170. Imprison'd in the Tower ibid. Defeated the Scotch under K. Henry VII ibid Made Lord Treasurer of England and restor'd to his fathers dignities ibid. Kill'd James IV. K. of Scotland in battel ib. Sent Ambassadour into France ibid. Made Vice-Roy of England ibid. Where he dy'd ibid. Howard Tho. the fourth Duke of Norfolk of that name and Earl Marshal of England 1â—1 Howard Tho. the Grand-son of the former Earl of Arundel and Surrey ibid. The first Earl of England ibid. Made Earl Marshal for life ibid. Hugh Bishop of Coventry exercis'd the Sheriffs place 116. Excommunicated ibid. De Humâ—z
son Clement Spelman containing many things relating to Impropriations and several instances of the judgements of God upon Sacriledge The greatest part of these instances seems to be taken from his History and Fate of Sacriledge a book still in Manuscript The Gentleman for whose sake it was written dy'd immediately upon the publication of this book but however it did very good service to the Church This Mr. Stephens has made appear in a Preface to some of his Posthumous Works wherein he instances in several Gentlemen who were induc'd by the reading of this book to restore their Impropriations to the Church That part of the Preface is since reprinted before an Edition of this book which came out in the Year 1668. and therefore I shall not repeat the Catalogue of them in this place I will only beg leave to mention a more modern benefaction of this kind as it is set down in the late Edition of Camden's Britannia Scarce two miles from Arksey in the West-riding of York-shire lies Adwick in the street memorable on this account that Mrs. Ann Savill a Virgin benefactor yet living daughter of John Savill of Medly Esq purchased the Rectory thereof for which she gave about 900l. and has settl'd it in the hands of Trustees for the use of the Church for ever and this from a generous and pious principle upon the reading of Sir Henry Spelman's noted Treatise De non temerandis Ecclesiis Some reflections were made upon this Discourse by an unknown Author who could not forgive Sir Henry for paying so much respect to Churches and particularly for applying the word Ecclesia to a material Church urging that this term belongs only to the Assembly or Congregation This Sir Henry takes notice of in his Glossary under the title Ecclesia producing some instances of the use of that word in ancient Authors and afterwards honoured it with a fuller Apology It is publisht by Mr. Stephens at the end of his Larger work of Tithes so call'd with respect to the Smaller Treatise De non temerandis Ecclesiis together with a pious Epistle to Mr. Richard Carew who in a Letter to the Author had express'd his dissatisfaction in some particulars of this Work His next book upon this subject is that which he calls the Larger work of Tithes publisht by Mr. Jerem. Stephens in the Year 1646. with an excellent Preface by the same hand In this Discourse he asserts Tithes to the Clergy from the Laws of Nature and of Nations from the Commands of God in the Old and New Testament and from the particular Constitution of our own Kingdom Another work in vindication of the Rights of the Church is still in Manuscript with this title The History and Fate of Sacriledge discover'd by examples of Scripture of Heathens and of Christians from the beginning of the world continually to this day by Sir Henry Spelman Kt. Anno Domini 1632. The account which the Oxford Antiquary gives us of it is this In the Year 1663. Mr. Stephens began to print the History of Sacriledge design'd and began by Sir Henry Spelman and left to Mr. Stephens to perfect and publish But that work sticking long in the Press both the Copy and sheets printed off perisht in the grand Conflagration of London 1666. I have been told by a Learned Divine since a Prelate of our Church that Mr. Stephens was forbidden to proceed in an Edition of that Work lest the publication of it should give offence to the Nobility and Gentry But whatever was the occasion of its continuing in the Press till the Fire of London it has been taken for granted that the whole book was irrecoverably lost and I was satisfied of the same upon Mr. Wood's relation of the matter till examining some Manuscripts which were given to the Bodleian Library by the late Bishop of Lincoln I met with a transcript of some part of it Upon further enquiry I found other parts in other places so that now the Work seems to be pretty entire He begins with a general definition of Sacriledge then reckons up various kinds of it as to Places Persons and Things after which he enumerates at large the many signal punishments of it among Heathens Jews and Christians describing more particularly the instances of that kind which have formerly happen'd in our Nation Then he proceeds to give an account of the attempt upon the lands of the Clergy in Henry the IV's time and how it was disappointed afterwards he descends to the suppression of Priories-Alien in the Reign of Henry V. and so on to the general Dissolution under Henry VIII Here he shows us the several steps of the Dissolution the King 's express promise to employ the Lands to the advancement of Learning Religion and Relief of the Poor with the remarkable Calamities that ensu'd upon the King his Posterity his principal Agents in that affair the new Owners of the Lands and the Lords who promoted and passed the Dissolution Act Concluding with a Chapter which contains The particulars of divers Monasteries in Norfolk whereof the late Owners since the Dissolution are extinct or decay'd or overthrown by Misfortunes and grievous Accidents This is a short account of a large Work wherein the judicious Author is far from affirming that their being concern'd in this Affair either as promoters of the Alienation or Possessors of the Lands was directly the occasion of the Calamities that ensu'd On the contrary he declares more than once that he will not presume to judge of the secret methods of God's Providence but only relates plain matters of fact and leaves every man to make his own application Tho' it must be granted that many of the instances and those well asserted are so terrible in the Event and in the Circumstances so surprising that no considering Man can well pass them over without a serious reflection This Discourse might have appear'd among his other Posthumous Works but that some persons in the present Age would be apt to interpret the mention of their Predecessors in such a manner and on such an occasion as an unpardonable reflection upon their Families These I think are all the Treatises that he either wrote or publisht about the Rights of the Church The next Work that I shall mention is a History of the Civil affairs of the Kingdom from the Conquest to Magna Charta taken from our best Historians and generally set down in their own words It is a Manuscript in the Bodleian Library and the title which Sir Henry has given it is this Codex Legum Veterum Statutorum regni Angliae quae ab ingressu Gulielmi usque ad annum nonum Henrici tertii edita sunt Hoc est ante primum Statutum omnium Impressorum in libris juridicis quod Magna Charta appellatur ab Edwardo I. confirmata E variis monimentis Authoribus Manuscriptis antiquis paginis concinnatum Opere Studio Henrici Spelman collecta Anno
p. 121. VIII Of the Original of Testaments and Wills and of their Probate to whom it it anciently belong'd p. 127. IX Icenia sive Norfolciae Descriptio Topographica p. 133. X. Catalogus Comitum Marescallorum Angliae p. 165. XI Dissertatio de Milite p. 172. De aetate Militari p. 174. De evocatis ad Militiam suscipiendam p. 175. De modo â—reandi Militem honoratum primo de Cingulo militari p. 176. Qui olim fiebant Milites p. 179. Qui possint militem facere p. 180. Judices etiam sub appellatione Militum censeri scil Equ esse Palatinos p. 182. De loco tempore Creationis p. 183. De Censu militari p. 184. Modus Exauctorandi Militem quod Degradare nuncupatur XII Historia Familiae de Sharnburn p. 187. XIII Familiae Extraneorum sive Lestrange accurata descriptio p. 200. XIV A Dialogue concerning the Coin of the Kingdom particularly what great treasures were exhausted from England by the usurpt Supremacy of Rome p. 203. XV. A Catalogue of the Places or Dwellings of the Arch-bishops and Bishops of this Realm now or of former times in which their several Owners have Ordinary Jurisdiction as if parcel of their Diocess tho' they be situate within the precinct of another Bishop's Diocess p. 211. THE Original Growth Propagation and Condition OF FEUDS and TENURES BY KNIGHT-SERVICE In ENGLAND CHAP. I. The occasion of this Discourse and what a Feud is IN the great case of Tenures upon the Commission of Defective Titles argued by all the Judges of Ireland and published after their resolution by the commandment of the Lord Deputy this year 1639. it fell out upon the fourth point of the Case to be affirmed That Tenures had their original in England before the Norman Conquest And in pursuit of this Assertion it was concluded That Feuds were then and there in use In proof hereof divers Laws and Charters of the Saxon Kings and some other Authorities be there alledged which being conceived to have clear'd that point it thus followeth in the Report p. 35. And therefore it was said that Sir Henry Spelman was mistaken who in his Glossary verbo Feodum refers the original of Feuds in England to the Norman Conquest And for a Corollary p. 38. addeth these words Neither is the bare conjecture of Sir Henry Spelman sufficient to take away the force of these Laws Vide Spelman in Glossar verbo Feodum Being thus by way of voucher made a chief Antagonist to the Reverend opinion of these learned grave and honour'd Judges I humbly desire of them that writing what I did so long ago and in a transitory passage among a thousand other obscure words not thinking then to be provok'd to this account they will be pleas'd to pardon my mistakings where they fall and to hear without offence what motives led me to my conjectures which they speak of It is necessary therefore that first of all we make the question certain which in my understanding is not done in the Report For it is not declared whether there were divers kinds of Feuds or no nor what kind they were that were in use among the Saxons nor what kind those were that I conjectured to be brought in by the Norman Conqueror I will therefore follow the direction of the Orator and fix the question upon the definition A Feud is said to be Vsus fructâ—s quidam rei immobilis sub conditione fidei But this Definition is of too large extent for such kind of Feuds as our Question must consist upon for it includeth two members or species greatly differing one from the other the one Temporary and revocable as those at Will or for Years Liâ—e or Lives the other Hereditary and perpetual As for Temporary â—euâ—s which like wild fig-trees could yield none of the feodal fruits of Wardship Marriage Relief c. unto their Lords they belong nothing unto our argument nor shall I make other use in setting of them forth than to assure the Reader they are not those that our Laws take notice of To come therefore to our proper Scheme let us see what that Hereditary Feud is whereupon our Question must be fixed for none but this can bear the feodal fruits we speak of Wardship Marriage c. A Feud is a right which the Vassal hath in Land or some immoveable thing of his Lord's to use the same and take the profits thereof hereditarily rendring unto his Lord such feodal duties and services as belong to military tenure the meer propriety of the soil always remaining unto the Lord. I call it as the Feudists do Jus utendi praedio alieno a right to use another mans Land not a property in it for in true feodal speech the Tenant or Vassal hath nothing in the propriety of the soil it self but it remaineth intirely unto the Lord and is comprehended under the usual name which we now give it of the Seignory So that the Seignory and the Feud being joyned together seem to make that absolute and compleat estate of Inheritance which the Feudists in time of old called Allodium But this kind of Feud we speak of and no other is that only whereof our Law taketh notice though time hath somewhat varied it from the first institution by drawing the propriety of the soil from the Lord unto the Tenant And I both conceive and affirm under correction That this our kind of Feuds being perpetual and hereditary and subject to Wardship Marriage and Relief with other feodal services were not in use among our Saxons nor our Law of Tenures whereon they depend once known unto them As shall appear by that which hereafter followeth CHAP. II. The Original Growth and Propagation of Feuds first in general then in England BEfore I enter into the Question in hand it will be necessary for better understanding that which followeth to set forth the original growth propagation and condition of Feuds in general which I conceive to be thus There were no doubt from the beginning of Jus Gentium Lords and Servants and those servants of two sorts Some to attend and guard the person of their Lord upon all occasions in War and Peace Some to manure his Lands for the sustenance of him and his Family When private Families were drawn into a Kingdom the Kings themselves held this distribution Examples hereof are in all Nations King David well observ'd it in the Institution of the Kingdom of Israel where if such services have any shew of Feuds or Tenures we have a pattern for them all viz. For that of Francalmoine in the Levites for Knight-service Tenure in Capite and Grand Serjeanty in the Military men which serv'd the King personally by monthly courses for Socage in those whom David appointed to manure the Fields dress the Vineyards the Olive-trees the Mulberry-trees and that had the care of the Oyl of the Oxen of the Camels Asses Sheep c. For the
lands and portion of the Levites was given to do the service of the Tabernacle the lands of the other tribes to fight the battels of the Lord against his idolatrous enemies and to root them out Thus may fancy couple the remotest things To come lower down and nearer home Pausanias tell 's us that when Brennus who they say was a Britain invaded Greece with an army of Gauls every horseman of the better sort had two other horsemen to attend and second him as his Vassals and they three together were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Trimarcesiam i. e. a society of three horsemen But Caesar saith that the nobler Gauls in his time had according to their abilities many horsemen attending them in war whom by a German word he calleth Ambactos which properly signifieth servants vassals workmen and labourers yet he by a fairer name expoundeth it there in Latin Clientes and in another place calleth them among the Germans Comites familiares as accounting them like Abraham's 318. Souldiers to be all their Lord's followers and of his family Tacitus likewise nameth them Comites as companions and followers quod bello sequi Dominum coguntur saith Cujacius But Tacitus further saith Gradus quinetiam ipse Comitatus habet judicio ejus quem sectantur that there were degrees in those companies as he whom they followed did appoint Like them perhaps in after-ages of Earls Barons Knights c. But how the Comites or Ambacti were maintained neither Caesar nor yet Tacitus have related As for such portions of land as we call Knights-Fees they could not then have any for Caesar speaking of the Germans saith and so it appears by Tacitus neque quisque agri modum certum aut fines proprios habet c. That no man hath any certain estate or peculiar bounds of lands but the Magistrate and Lords of the place assign from year to year to kindreds and such as live together what quantity of land and in what place they think good and the next year force them to remove The reason you may see in Caesar who also sheweth That they had no common Magistrate but the Lord of the Town or territorie set what laws he would among his followers or Ambactos These laws the Goths the Swedes the Danes and Saxons called Bilagines of By which in all these languages signifieth a town and lagh or laghen which signifieth laws as Gravius Suecus and our Saxon Authors testifie And tho' Jornandes a Spanish Goth writeth it after the Spanish corruption Bellagine◠yet we in England keep the very radix and word it self By-laws even unto this day tho' diverted somewhat from the sense that Caesar speaks of For we call them Town-laws or By-laws which the Townsmen make among themselves but Caesar sheweth that the Lords imposed them Herewith agreeth that of Tacitus or some other Ancient who speaking of the Germans saith Agricolis suis jus dicunt They give laws to them which dwell upon their lands For I take Agricolis here in the larger sense to extend to all that dwell upon the Lord's lands as well his military followers as his husbandmen in the same manner as solicolae containeth all that live upon the soil ruricolae all that live in the Country and coelicolae all that live in heaven These Lordships of Towns which Caesar speaketh of were after by the Normans called Maneria The Ambacti or Comites and these which he saith sectabantur Dominos suos were called Vassalli and sectatores manerii sive Curiae Domini Vassals and Suiters of Court The Bilagines or Town-laws were called Consuetudines and customs of the Mannor The jurisdiction which the Lord had over his followers and suiters was called the Court Baron and the portions of land c. assigned to his followers for their stipend or maintenance were at first called Munera after Beneficia and lastly Feuda or Tenant-lands which were of two sorts one for military men called Feudum militare and Feudum nobile tenure by Knights-service the other for husbandmen call'd therefore Feudum rusticum ignobile tenure in Socage or by the Plough Thus it appeareth that Feuds and Tenures and the Feudal law it self took their original from the Germans and Northern Nations In such condition therefore how obscure soever as Caesar and Tacitus left them to us Gerardus Niger the Consul of Milan who flourished about A. D. 1176. and first composed them into a book taketh them up as he there findeth them and speaking of the times of Caesar and Tacitus as having the forementioned passages under his eye saith Antiquissimo tempore sic erat in Dominorum potestate connexum ut quando vellent possent auferre rem in feudum à se datam And this agreeth with Caesar by whom it seemeth in the places before mentioned that the Ambacti or followers of the Germans had in those times either no land at all or no estate at all in their land or first but at the will of the Lord and then but for one single year Which Gerardus also confesseth to have been the condition of the eldest sort of feudataries for he saith presently after his former words Postea vero eo ventum est ut per annum tantum stabilitatem haberent res in feudum datae Thus for another while their Feudal Vassals whom here he calleth fideles and we now tenants by Knights-Service enjoyed their feuds no otherwise than from year to year at the pleasure of their Lords either by grant or sufferance till further grace confirmed them to them for divers years and at length for term of life which Gerardus also presently there declareth saying Deinde statutum est ut usque ad vitam fidelis producerentur feuda In this manner stood the principal feuds themselves even those of Earldoms and Dukedoms which they call feuda majora and feuda regalia in the latter time of the Saxons till the coming of the Conquerour But as touching the lesser feuds which we call Knights-Fees I find nothing in Abby-books otherwise than a numerous multitude of Leases and Grants made by Bishops and Abbats to their followers for term of life without mention of Tenure or Feudal service Yet I must confess that there is a notable precedent left us by Oswald Bishop of Worcester in the time of King Edgar who in granting out the lands of his Bishoprick unto his followers for life or three lives imposed upon them by a solemn Instrument ratified by the King himself a multitude of services and charges as well military as civil which after you shall here see and then consider how and whether they conduce to our Feuds or not If we understand them to be Feuds among the Saxons or of that nature then are we sure they were no more than for life and not inheritable nor stretching further without further grace obtained from the Lord.
Christian King caused his own Laws to be put in writing about the year 605. as other Western Nations in an age or two before had done and as Bede saith wrote them in the Saxon tongue The first Charter if I shall so call it or writing touching lands and privileges was as a MS. of Canterbury reporteth made by Withredus King of Kent in the year 694. and as that Charter it self witnesseth was appointed to be kept in the Church of our Saviour at Canterbury as a precedent for posterity to imitate and tho' it appeareth not there in what language it was written yet I presume it was in the same with their Law which was the Saxon tongue For there be two copies of it extant in Latin so differing the one from the other as thereby they both appear to be translations For proof thereof the one of them useth the words Charta and Chartula which Ingulfus affirmeth to be brought in hither by the Normans that is above three hundred years after the time of this Charter of Withred's The other Latin copy termeth it Scriptum not Chartam and the Saxons themselves used neither of those words but called such writings in Latin Chirographos not Chartas as Ingulfus there also testifieth So that it hereby appeareth that the Prototype or first pattern of Charters which the Saxons imitated was not in Latin but in Saxon. Secondly it is therefore to be presumed and very strongly that tho' this Charter of Beorredus remaineth to us by a Latin copy yet the original it self like a thousand others was in the Saxon tongue Nor could it in all probability be otherwise for at the very time when it was made viz. in anno 868. learning was so generally subverted throughout England by the barbarous Danes that King Alfred who began to reign within four years after the date thereof saith Paucissimi fuerunt cis Humbrum qui vel preces suas communes sermone Anglico intelligere potuerant vel scriptum aliquod è Latino transferre Tam sane pauci fuerunt ut ne unum quidem recordari possum ex australi parte Thamesis tum cum ego regnare occaeperam But as their original Charters were in the Saxon tongue so in the Leiger-books in which they are preserved to us they are often set down in the Saxon and then because the books themselves are in Latin they are there translated also into Latin and often times set down in the Latin only without the Saxon as in the book of Ramsey-Abby which having no Charters in it in the Saxon tongue the Author of it saith that himself had there translated them all into Latin after that that Abby in the days of King Stephen had recovered her liberty Yet I deny not that Latin Charters might be often used by their latter Clergy-men when learning which in Beorred's time was utterly subverted began at last to recover life again Thirdly I conceive that the word feudum or feodum was not in use in Beorredus's days viz. anno 868. For proof whereof we are to consider the infancy youth and full age of the Feodal Law for according to these several times the Feodal Lands had their several denominations First they were called Munera then Beneficia and lastly Feuda as is aforesaid Marculfus who collected the Formulas or Precedents as we call them of Charters and Instruments of the time he lived in which was under Clodovaeus II. King of France about the year 660. maketh mention in his first book of Munera and in his second of Beneficia but no where of Feuda and he who a hundred years or more after him collected the Formula's incerti Autoris speaketh divers times of Beneficium but never nameth Feudum for that this term came not into use till afterwards when these Beneficia began to be granted in perpetuity Beneficium Regis saith Bignonius postea Feudum dictum est And in another place he saith Beneficii nomine ea praedia dicta sunt quae Feuda posteritas dixit initio namque vita accipientis finiebantur As if he should say they were called Beneficia when they were granted only for life of the Grantee but were called Feuda when they began to be granted in perpetuity and not before Cujacius therefore speaking of Feudatarii which word came into use with Feudum for Relatives mutuo se ponunt auferunt saith that when Actores custodesque proediorum nostrorum temporarii perpetui esse caeperunt c. when those who had the use and ordering of our Lands for a certain time began to enjoy them in perpetuity and yet retained their Latin name of Homines our Men they grew then also to be called after new and forreign names Vassalli Leudes and Feudatarii by the Princes and great Noblemen who choosed rather to grant them lands in perpetuity in consideration that they should do them military service And he saith that these names were first brought into Italy by the German Princes Where and particularly in Milan as Merula reporteth the Feodal Laws and Customs have had their original and from thence been propagated throughout Europe By this it appeareth that the words Feudum and Feudatarii were not in use till that the word Munera was grown obsolete Nor afterward till Beneficia leaving to be temporary or but for life became to be perpetual possessions which as I have often said was not long before the Conquest So that the word Feudum could not be in use in Beorredus's time who lived two hundred years before Fourthly Tho' the word Feudum were in the original Charter of Beorredus yet doth it not prove that our Feuds were then in use For call them Beneficia or call them Feuda certain it is that neither the one nor the other were then hereditary or perpetual but either temporary or for life only which at length begat the difference between Feuda and Beneficia for Beneficia in a restrained sense began to signifie no more than an estate for life in which sense it resteth at this day in our Clergy-men's Livings called Benefices and the word Feuda grew to be understood only of such Beneficia or Benefices as were perpetual and hereditary To return from whence we digressed I suppose it now appeareth sufficiently how some Feodal words are crept into Charters and writings of Saxon date and I think I may conclude that the words before mentioned Tenura tenentes tenementa tenere or tenendum in a feodal sense or feodum it self were not in use among them Much less Tenure in Capite Tenure by Knight-service Tenure in Socage or Frank-Almoign tho' the like services were performed to the Saxon Lordships by their Thanes and Theodens their Socmen or Husbandmen and their Beads-men or Clergy-men by way of contract for the lands received from them as were after the Conquest to the Norman Lordships by way of Tenure for lands holden of them The Neapolitan and Sicilian Constitutions which
had their original from Princes of Norman lineage do ..... the Conquest here in England make mention of tenens tenere tenementum and tenere de Rege in Capite but whether the Normans carried these terms into Italy when they Conquer'd Naples about the year 1031. or brought them from thence into Normandy I cannot determine Certain it is that from the Normans they came to us in England for being not met with before in any authentick Author we presently after the Conquest begin to hear of them even about the third or fourth year of the Conqueror's reign as appeareth by his Charter of Emendationes Legum in the Red book of the Exchequer f. 162. b. and in Lambard's Archaionomia CHAP. IV. Of Tenures in Capite more particularly TOuching Tenures therefore in Capite I think I may boldly say that here were none in England in the Saxons time after the manner now in use among us First For that their Feodal Lands as we have shewed were not descendible before the Conquest For tho' there were hlaâ—ord and ðane amongst the Saxons that is Lord and Thane or Servitour whom beyond the Seas they called Seigneur Vassall alias Vassallum Dominum Clientem while their feuds were arbitrable or but for years or life yet grew not the words of tenure into use till that Feuds became descendable to posterities and thereby obliged the whole succession of heirs to depend and hold upon their Capital Lords by the services imposed at the creation of that Feud Secondly The word in Capite is like a Relative in Logick which being a supreme degree of it self implieth some other degrees to be under it as Tenant in medio or Tenant in imo or both viz. Tenant in Capite Tenant in menalty and Tenant Paravale or at least Tenant in Capite and Tenant Paravale which inferiour Tenants could not be in the Saxons time for that the granting of Feuds in perpetuity out of which the under-Tenancies must be deduced was as I have said not yet in use Thirdly to hold in Capite is of two sorts The one general which is of the King as Caput regni caput generalissimum omnium Feodorum the fountain whence all feuds and tenures have their main original The other special or subaltern which is of a particular subject as Caput feudi or terrae illius so called because he was the first that created and granted that feud or land in that manner of tenure wherein it standeth and is therefore at this day so to be understood by the ordinary words in our Deeds of tenendum de Capitalibus Dominis feodi illius c. signifying that the lands so granted since the statute of Quia Emptores terrarum must now be holden mediately or immediately of him or his heirs or assigns that was Caput Feodi the first that created or granted that Feud in that tenure who thereupon was called Capitalis Dominus Caput terrae illius among the Feudists Capitanus feudi illius And the Grantee and his heirs were said to be Tenants in Capite because they held immediately of him that first granted that feud or land in that manner Hereupon David I. King of Scots and Earl of Huntingdon here in England was in right of his Earldom in the time of King Henry I. said to be Capud terrae de Crancfeld Craule post regem Angliae And Roger de Molbray about the same time or shortly after made a grant in these words Roger de Molbray omnibus hominibus fidelibus suis Normannis Anglis salutem Sciatis quod ego concessi Roberto de Ardenna Clerico amico meo totum nemus de Bedericheslea cum omnibus antiquis libertatibus consuetudinibus ejusdem nemoris ad tenendum de me in Capite haeredibus meis ita libere quiete c. sicut ego unquam c. The Deed is without date but note that the direction of it is Omnibus hominibus fidelibus suis Normannis Anglis which implieth that it was made before Henry II's time for he being of Anjou in France and bringing in French-men with him altered then very properly the directions of Charters into Hominibus fidelibus suis Francis Anglis Yet I find the same direction tho' more improperly to be some time used under the Norman Kings Qu. So likewise as before W. Marshall the great Earl of Pembrock in a Charter of his useth these words about the beginning of Henry III's time as I take it Nisi fortè forinseca tenementa tenueris de me in Capite And Mat. Paris in An. 1250. making mention of one G. a Knight saith that Rex memoratus Hen. III. cuidam militi tenenti de Ecclesia S. Albani in Capite c. warennam concessit where the words tenenti de Ecclesia S. Albani in Capite do signifie that some Abbat of the Church of St. Alban first created and granted that Feud Having thus in general manner prepared my way to the ensuing discourse I shall now God willing by the patience of them whom it most concerneth examine such particular assertions as are produced in the Report either to prove our Tenures and Feuds with their dependancies to have been in use among the Saxons or to disprove what I have affirmed in my Glossary or in the Chapters here precedent and will first shew therein as followeth CHAP. V. What degrees and distinction of persons were among the Saxons and of what condition their lands were FOr the better understanding of our discourse it is necessary that we should shew what degrees and distinctions of persons were among the Saxons and of what condition their lands were Touching their persons they are by themselves divided in this manner Eorle and Ceorl and Ãegn and Ãeoden In Latin Comes and Villanus Tainus unus alius singuli pro modo suo That is to say the Earl and the Husbandman the Thane of the greater sort called the King's Thane and the Thane of the lesser sort called the Theoden or Vnder-thane More degrees the Saxons had not in their Laity and among these must all the tenures lye that were in use with them As for their bond-men whom they called Theowes and Esnes they were not counted members of that Common-wealth but parcels of their Master's goods and substance Touching lands among the Saxons they were of two sorts Bocland and Folcland Bocland signifieth terram codicillarem or librariam Charter-lands for the Saxons called a Deed or Charter an bec i. e. librum a book and this properly was their terra haereditaria for it commonly carried with it the absolute inheritance and propriety of the Land and was therefore preserved in writing and possess'd by the Thanes and Nobler sort as proedium nobile liberum immune a servitiis vulgaribus servilibus In which respect the Thanes themselves were also called liberales as appeareth by Canute's Forest-laws Art 1. 3.
Earldoms But say they tenue neant moiens en fief a vie c. holden notwithstanding as a fief for life not hereditary nor patrimonial in the beginning as afterward they were This change they assign to have been begun about the end of the first line of their Kings who being at that time weak and simple men the Dukes and Earls took opportunity to make their Estates hereditary But it continued not long for the first Kings of the second line reduced them presently to conformity Yet some there were in the remote Provinces that maintain'd themselves hereditary in despight of the Kings whereupon ensued many wars Thus far both these Authors do concur and then Loyseau addeth further That at the end of the second line Hugh Capet having made himself King of France permitted all to hold their Dukedoms Earldoms and Seigneuries hereditarily and taking homage of them as of hereditary Fiefs each party obliged themselves to support the other and their posterity in those dignities as hereditarily This happened in France a little before the Conquest of England and from this precedent of Hugh Capet's did our William the Conquerour make the Earldoms and Feuds in England first hereditary as we have already shewed in the second Chapter So that I conclude as I assumed in the beginning that the Saxon Earldoms were not hereditary nor otherwise Feodal if we shall so term them than for life whereon neither Wardship nor Marriage c. could depend Yet I confess that the Dukes and Earls of the Saxon times both had and might have great possessions in other lands as patrimonial and hereditary namely their Thaneland and in what condition they possessed them it shall appear anon when we come to speak more at large of Thanes and Thane-lands CHAP. VII Of Ceorls and that they were ordinarily but as Tenants at will or having lands held not by Knight-service THe division before mentioned which the Saxons made of their own degrees leadeth me in this next place tho' not orderly to speak of the Ceorle that is of the Carle or Churle and Husbandman The Ancients called him in Latin Villanus not as we ordinarily take it for a Bondman but for him that dwelling in a Village or Country Town lived by the Country course of Husbandry Mr. Lambard therefore to decline the misconceiving of the word Villanus doth render it in the Saxon laws by Paganus which signifieth the same that Villanus doth according to the French for a Villager but not according to our English for a Bondman Our Saxons otherwhile did term them like the Dutchmen Boors that is such as live by tilth or grasing and by works of husbandry Such were the Ceorls among the Saxons but of two sorts one that hired the Lord's Outland or Tenementary land called also the Folcland like our Farmers the other that tilled and manured his Inland or Demeans yielding operam not censum work and not rent and were thereupon called his Socmen or Ploughmen These no doubt were oftentimes his very Bondmen I therefore shall not meddle with them but will hold me to the first sort who having ordinarily no lands of their own lived upon the Outlands before mentioned of their Lord the Thane as custumary Tenants at his will after the usual manner of that time rendring unto him a certain portion of victuals and things necessary for Hospitality This rent or retribution they called Feorme but the word in the Saxon signifieth meat or victuals and tho' we have ever since Henry II's time chang'd this reservation of victuals into money yet in letting our lands we still retain the name of Fearms and Fearmers unto this day The quantity of the Fearme or rent for every plough-land seemeth in those times to have been certain in every Country according to the nature of the place King Ina in his laws did make it so through all the territory of the West-Saxons as you may see with much more touching this matter in my Glossary verbo Firma But insomuch as the chiefest part of the fruit and profits of the lands thus manured by the Ceorls or Husbandmen redounded to the benefit of their Lords and not of the Ceorls themselves the Romans counted them to be as bondmen and not freemen Caesar therefore speaking of them while they were yet in Germany saith Plebs pene servorum habebatur loco That their common people were in a manner bondmen And Tacitus to the same purpose Caeteris servis meaning these Ceorls or Husbandmen non in nostrum morem descriptis per familiam ministeriis utuntur suam quisque sedem suos penates regit Frumenti modum Dominus aut pecoris aut vestis ut colono injungit Et servus hactenus paret But this service was no bondage For the Ceorl or Husbandman might as well leave this land at his will as the Lord might put him from it at his will and therefore it was provided by the laws of Ina in what manner he should leave the land when he departed from it to another place And the Writ of Waste in Fitz-Herbert seemeth to shew that they might depart if they were not then well used It is apparent also that the Ceorl was of free condition for that his person was valued as a member of the Common-wealth in the laws of Aethelstan and his least valuation is there reckoned to be 200s. whereas the Bondman was not valued at all for that he was not as I said any part of the Common-wealth but of his Master's substance nor was he capable of any publick office But the Ceorl tho' he had no land might rise to be the leader of his Country-men and to use the armour of a Thane or Knight viz. an Helmet an Habergeon and a gilt Sword And if his wealth so increased as that he became owner of five hides of land the valuation of his person which they call'd his Were or Weregild was increased to two thousand thrimsas that is six thousand shillings and being then also adorned with other marks of dignity he was counted for a Thane as you shall see in the next Chapter But for all this a Ceorl or Husbandman tho' he were a Freeman was not by the Feodal law of that and later times capable of a Knights-fee or land holden by military service and therefore what land soever he purchased was to be intended land of no such tenure And it appeareth further by the laws of Aethelstan that the five hides of land before mentioned purchased by the Ceorl were descendable to his posterity which sheweth also that they were not feodal land for that feuds at that time were not here descendable as we have often declared So that I hope I may conclude that the Ceorls or Husbandmen among the Saxons held no land by our tenure of Knight-service CHAP. VIII Of Thanes and their several kinds SEeing then the weight of the question will rest wholly upon the
for some portions also of their Out-lands These were after called feoda rustica beyond the Seas with us socage-Socage-lands and were holden at pleasure of their Lords either by rendring part of the profits thereupon growing or reared as victuals especially in Saxon called Feorms c. whereof see the rates in the Laws of King Ina Chap. 70. or by doing some works of Husbandry upon the Lord's Inlands now called his Demeans as Tillage Carriage Harvest-works c. Among all these diversities of services none cometh so near to the nature of Feuds and Tenures as the Beneficiary do Let us therefore consider them the more seriously by that notable pattern of them left unto us from Bishop Oswald who dividing much of the land of his Church of Worcester into those kind of portions which after the Feodal word then in use he called Beneficia granted the same unto his Thanes and followers not by the name of his milites or tenentes but of his fidos subditos for the term of three lives according to the manner which they retain in those parts even to this day and reserving to his Church and successors not homagium sâ—rvitium the material words in Tenure to create Knights-service in the Feodal Law but the services mentioned in his Charter secundum Conventionem cum eis factam sponsionem suam as the very words are there expresly But hear the Charter or rather Epistle as he himself calleth it which the King confirmed and a Councell The Aranga or preamble of it is a thankful acknowledgement of King Edgar's bounty and goodness to him the Bishop and his Church the conclusion after the manner of those times a curse and heavy imprecation against all such as shall spoil or violate the same Both which being long and nothing to our purpose I think convenient here to pretermit The rest is as followeth under the title given it in the Manuscript CHAP. XXVI The Charter whereby Oswald Bishop of Worcester disposed divers lands of his Church after the Feodal manner of that time entituled Indiculum libertatis de Oswaldes-Lawes-Hundred DOmino meo charissimo Regi Anglorum Edgaro ego Oswaldus Wigorniensis Ecclesiae Episcopus c. Quare quomodo fidos mihi subditos telluribus quae meae traditae sunt potestati per spatium temporis trium hominum id est duorum post se haeredum condonarem placuit tam mihi quam ipsis fautoribus consiliariis meis cum ipsius Domini mei regis licentia attestatione ut fratribus meis successoribus scil Episcopis per Chirographi cautionem apertius enuclearem ut sciant quid ab eis extorquere juste debeant secundum conventionem cum eis factam sponsionem suam unde hanc Epistolam ob cautelae causam componere studui nequis malignae cupiditatis instinctu hoc sequenti tempore mutare volens abjurare a servitio Ecclesiae queat Haec itaque conventio cum eis facta est ipso Domino meo Rege annuente sua attestatione munificentae suae largitatem roborante confirmante omnibusque ipsius regiminis sapientibus principibus attestantibus consentientibus hoc pacto eis terras Sanctae Ecclesiae sub me tenere concessi Hoc est ut omnis Equitandi lex ab eis impleatur quae ad Equites pertinet ut pleniter persolvant omnia quae ad jus ipsius Ecclesiae juste competunt scil ea quae Anglice dicuntur Ciricsceott Toll id est thelonium Tacc id est swinseade caetera jura Ecclesiae nisi Episcopus alicui eorum quid pardonare voluerit seseque quamdiu ipsas terras tenent in mandatis Pontificis humiliter cum omni subjectione perseverare etiam jurejurando affirment Super haec etiam ad omnis industriae Episcopi indigentiam semet ipsos praesto impendant Equos praestent ipsi Equitent ad totum piramiticum opus Ecclesiae calcis atque ad Pontis aedificum ultro inveniantur parati Sed Venationis sepem Domini Episcopi ultronei ad aedificandum repperiantur suaque quandocunque Domino Episcopo libuerit Venabula destinent Venatum Insuper ad multas alias indigentiae causas quibus opus est Domino Antistiti saepe furnisci sive ad suum servitium sive ad regale explendum semper illius Archiductoris dominatui voluntati qui Episcopatui praesidet propter beneficium quod illis praestitum est cum omni humilitate subjectione subditi fiant secundum ipsius voluntatem terrarum quas quisque possidet quantitatem Decurso autem praefati temporis curriculo viz. duorum qui post eos qui eas mode possident haeredum vitae spatio in ipsius Antistitis sit arbitrio quid inde velit quomodo sui velle sit inde ita stet sive ad suum opus eas retinere si sic sibi utile judicaverit sive eas alicui diutius praestare si sic sibi placuerit velit ita duntaxat ut semper Ecclesiae servitia pleniter ut praefati sumus inde persolvantur Ast si quid praefatorum delicti praevaricantis causa defuerit jurum praevaricationis delictum secundum quod Praesulis jus est emendet aut illo quo antea potitus est dono terra careat Siquis vero Diabolo instigante c. The sum of all aforesaid is that the Bishop's Tenant shall pay and do as followeth First That they shall perform all duties that belong to Horsemen That they shall pay all things that are due unto the Church and perform all other rights that belong to it That they shall swear to be in all humble subjection at the command of the Bishop as long as they shall hold these lands of him That as often as the occasion of the Bishops shall so require they shall present themselves to be ready for it and shall both furnish him with Horses and ride themselves That of their own accord they shall be ready to perform all the work about the Steeple of that Church and for the building of Castles and Bridges That they shall readily help to fence in the Bishop's Parks and to furnish him with Hunting weapons when he goeth a hunting That in many other cases when the occasion of the Lord Bishop shall require whether it be for his own service or for the King's service they shall in all humbleness and subjection be obedient to the chief Captain or Leader of the Bishoprick for the benefit done unto them and the quantity of land which every one of them possesseth That after the expiration of the three lives the land shall return again to the Bishoprick That if there be any defect in performing the premisses by reason that some shall vary or break the agreement the Delinquent shall make satisfaction according to the justice of the Bishop or shall forfeit the land which he had of his gift I suppose that this was the common manner of grants and reservations in those
viz. Towns or Mannours to the Lords thereof whom the Saxons called Theings after Barons Hundreds to the Lords of the Hundreds Trithings or Lathes to their Trithingreves Counties to their Earls or Aldermen and the larger Satrapies to their Dukes or chief Princes All which had subordinate Authority one under the other and did within the precinct of their own Territories minister justice unto their Subjects For the Theinge or Lord of the Town whom the Normans called a Baron had of old Jurisdiction over them of his own Town being as it were his Colony and as Cornelius Tacitus saith did Agricolis suis jus dicere For those whom we now call Tenants were in those ancient times but Husbandmen dwelling upon the soil of the Lord and manuring the same on such conditions as the Lord assigned or else such as were their followers in the wars and had therefore portions of ground appointed unto them in respect of that service which portion was thereupon called a Knights-fee for that a servant in the war whom the Saxons called a Knight had it allotted unto him as the fee or wages of his service Neither at the first had they these their fees but at the Lord's pleasure or for a time limited and therefore both these kinds of Military and Husbandmen dwelling upon the Town or Colony of the Lord were as in reason they ought under the censure and will of their Lord touching the lands they ocucpy'd who therefore set them laws and customs how and in what manner they should possess these their lands and as any controversy rose about them the Lord assembling the rest of his followers did by their opinion and assistance judge it Out of which usage the Court-Barons took their beginning and the Lords of Towns and Mannours gain'd the priviledge of holding plea and jurisdiction within those their Territories over their Tenants and followers who thereupon are at this day called Sectatores in French Suitres of suivre to follow But the Saxons themselves called this jurisdiction sacha and soca signifying thereby Causarum actionem and libertatem judicandi for sacha signifieth causa in which sense we yet use it as when we say For God's sake and soca signifieth liberty or priviledge as Cyriâ—socne libertas Ecclesiae But by this manner the Lords of Towns as ex conâ—â—etudine Regni came to have jurisdiction over their Tenants and followers and to hold plea of all things touching land But as touching cognizance in criminal matters they had not otherwise to meddle therewith than by the King's Charters For as touching the King's peace every Hundred was divided into many Freeborgs or Tithings consisting of ten men which stood all bound one for the other and did amongst themselves punish small matters in their Court for that purpose called the Lete which was sometime granted over to the Lords of Mannours and sometime exercised by peculiar officers But the greater things were also carryed from thence into the Hundred Courts so that both the streams of Civil justice and of Criminal did there meet and were decided by the Hundreds c as by superiour Judges both to the Court Baron and Court Leet also Edward the Confessor Ll. ca. 32. saith that there were Justices over every ten Freeborgs called Deans or Tienheofod that is head of ten which among their Neighbours in Towns compounded matters of trespasses done in pastures Meadows Corn and other strifes rising among them But the greater matters saith he were referred to superiour Justices appointed over every ten of them whom we may call Centurions Centenaries or Hundradors because they judged over an hundred Freeborgs The Lord of the Hundred therefore had jurisdiction over all the Towns of the Hundred as well in Criminal matters as in Civil and they that failed of their right in the Court Barons Tithings or Leets might now prosecute it here before the Lord of the Hundred and his followers called the Suitors of the Hundred which were the Lords and owners of lands within that Hundred who were tyed to be there at every Court which as appeareth by the Laws of H. I. ca. 8. was to be holden twelve times in the year that is once every month But especially a full appearance was required twice in the year in memory whereof the Suitors are at this day called at our Lady and Michaelmass Courts by the Steward of the Hundred These as I said before held piea of trespasses done in Pastures Meadows Corn and such like and of other strifes arising between Neighbour and Neighbour and as by and by also shall be shewed of Criminal matters touching the very life of a man Decrevit tum porro Aluredus c. King Alured then further decreed that every Free-man should be settled in some Hundred and appointed to some Freeborg or Tithing as did also Canutus Ll. par 2. cap. 19. and that the heads of these Tithings or Freeborg whom we now call Capitales plegii should judge the smaller matters as in Leets c. but should reserve the greater for the Hundred Court and those of most difficulty to the Alderman and Sheriff in the County Court Lamb. voc Centuria The order of which proceedings in the Hundred Court do there also appear out of the Laws of King Ethelred made in a great Assembly at Vanatinge Cap. 4. In singulis Centuriis Comitia sunto c. Let the Courts be holden in every Hundred and let twelve men of the elder sort together with the Reve of the Hundred holding their hands upon some holy thing take their oath that they shall neither condemn any man that is innocent nor quit him that is guilty And it seemeth by the Laws of Canutus par 2. cap. 16. 18. That a man was not to be delayed above three Court days from having his right for if he were he might then resort to the County and if he obtained it not there within four Courts then he might seek unto the King And no doubt but this Law opened a great gap for the carrying of matters from the Hundred and County Courts up to the King 's Court. The Jurisdiction also of this Court seemeth to be further abated by H. I. who tho' he establish'd the ancient manner of holding it yet pulled he from it some principal parts thereof as after shall appear in a Writ of his touching this and the County Court directed to the Sheriff of Worcester MS. Co. pa. inter 48. 49. The Thrithingreve or Leidgreve whom I take to be the same called in the Salic Laws Tungimus but doubt whether he or no that in our Laws of H. I. is called Thungrevius was an officer that had authority over the third part of the County or three or more Hundreds or Wapentakes whose Territory was thereupon called a Thrithing otherwise a Leid or Lath in which manner the County of Kent is yet divided and the Rapes in Sussex seem to answer the same And perhaps the Ridings also of Yorkshire
that none should be put to further trouble unless the King 's own necessity or the common good of the Kingdom required it Therefore the Bishops Earls Sheriffs Heretoches or Marshals of Armies Trithingreves Leidgreves Lieutenants Hundredors Aldermen Magistrates Reves Barons Vavasors Thungreves and other Lords of land must be all diligently attending at these Assemblies lest that the lewdness of offenders the misdemeanor Gravionum i. of Sheriffs and the ordinary corruption of Judges escaping unpunished make a miserable spoil of the people First let the laws of true Christianity which we call the Ecclesiastical be fully executed with due satisfaction then let the pleas concerning the King be dealt with and lastly those between party and party and whomsoever the Church-Synod shall find at variance let them either make an accord between them in love or sequester them by their sentence of excommunication c. Whereby it appeareth that Ecclesiastical causes were at that time under the cognizance of this Court But I take them to be such Ecclesiastical causes as were grounded upon the Ecclesiastical laws made by the Kings themselves for the government of the Church for many such there were almost in every King's time and not for matters rising out of the Roman Canons which haply were determinable only before the Bishop and his Ministers To proceed Before they entered into any causes as it is commanded in the Laws of Canutus which we mentioned par 2. ca. 17. the Bishop to use the term of our time which from hence taketh the original gave a solemn charge unto the people touching Ecclesiastical matters opening unto them the rights and reverence of the Church and their duty therein towards God and the King according to the word of God and Divinity Then the Alderman in like manner related unto them the Laws of the land and their duty towards God the King and Common-wealth according to the rule and tenure thereof Of all which because I find a notable precedent in a Synodal Edict made by Carolus Calvus Emperour and King of France in Concil Carissiaco An. Dom. 856. I will here add it not to shew that our Saxons took their form of government from the French but that both the French and they as brethren descending from one parent the German kept the rights and laws of their natural Country Episcopi quinque in suis parochiis Missi in illorum Missaticis Comitesque in eorum Comitatibus pariter placita teneant quo omnes Reipub. Ministri Vassi Dominici omnesque quicunque vel quorumcunque homines in iisdem parochiis Comitatibus sine ulla personaram acceptione excusatione aut dilatione conveniant c. That is The Bishops in their parishes or Diocesses and the Justices Itinerant or Aldermen in their Circuits and the Earls in their Counties shall hold their pleas together whereunto all Ministers and Officers of the Common-wealth all the King's Barons and all other whatsoever they be or whose Tenants soever they be within the same parishes or Counties without any respect of persons excuse or delay shall assemble together And the Bishop of that parish or Diocess having briefly noted sentences touching the matter out of the Evangelists Apostles and Prophets shall read them to the people and also the decrees Apostolick and Canons of the Church and in open and plain terms shall instruct them all what manner and how great a sin it is to violate or spoil the Church and what and how great pennance and what merciless and severe punishment it requireth with other accustomed necessary and profitable admonishments The Aldermen also or Justices shall note down such sentences of law as they call to mind and shall publish unto them the Constitutions of us and our predecessors Kings and Emperours gathered together touching this matter And the Bishops by the Authority of God and the Apostles and the Aldermen or Justices and Earls under the penalty of the King's Laws shall with all the care they can prohibit every man of the Kingdom from making any prey or spoil of the Church c. OF PARLIAMENTS WHEN States are departed from their original Constitution and that original by tract of time worn out of memory the succeeding Ages viewing what is past by the present conceive the former to have been like to that they live in and framing thereupon erroneous propositions do likewise make thereon erroneous inferences and Conclusions I would not pry too boldly into this ark of secrets but having seen more Parliaments miscarry yea suffer shipwrack within these sixteen years past than in many hundred heretofore I desire for my understanding's sake to take a view of the beginning and nature of Parliaments not meddling with them of our time which may displease both Court and Country but with those of old which now are like the siege of Troy matters only of story and discourse Because none shall go beyond me in this argument I will begin with the foundation of Kingdoms which of necessity must be more ancient than Parliaments for that a Parliament is the grand Council of the Kingdom assembled at the commandment of the King for advice in matters of State Our first labour is then to see what this Grand-Council was originally It is confest on all hands that the King is universal Lord of his whole Territories and that no man possesseth any part thereof but deriv'd from him either mediately or immediately This derivation thus proceeded The King in the beginning divided his whole territory into two parts one to be manured by his own Tenants and Husbandmen then call'd Socmen For the Kings of England us'd in those days to stock their grounds themselves like the Kings of Israel and by the profits thereof especially to maintain their Hospitality their Court and Estate having in every Mannour Officers and Servants for that purpose This part was Sacrum Patrimonium the inseperable inheritance of the Crown call'd in Doomsday Terra Regis and in Law the Ancient Demaine And because it belong'd to the husbandry of the King all that manur'd or held any part of this land were said to be Tenants in Socage and might not be drawn into the wars of which nature as touching their Tenure they continue at this day The other part of his whole territory he portioned out to Military men which tho' the other was the more profitable yet this was always held for the more honourable and therefore so divided this among his Nobles and chief servants and followers for supportation in his wars and Royal Estate To some in greater measure to others in less according to their merit and qualities Provinces to Dukes Counties to Earls Castles and Signiories unto Barons rendring unto him not ex pacto vel condicto for that was but cautela superabundans but of common right and by the Law of Nations for so I may term the Feodal-law then to be in our Western Orb all Feodal duties and services due from the Donees and their
heirs upon every gift grant and alienation tho' no word were spoken of them It appeareth by the Feodal-law from whence all that part of our Common-law that concerneth Tee and Tenures hath original and which our Common-law also affirmeth that there was always due ..... Those that thus receiv'd their Territories from the King were said to hold them in Capite for that the King is Caput Regni and were thereupon call'd Capitanei Regis and Capitanei Regni otherwise Barones Regis the King's men Tenants or Vassals who having all the land divided amongst them saving that which the King reserv'd to himself as Sacrum Patrimonium were also call'd Pares Regni and were always upon commandment about the person of the King to defend him and his Territories in war and to counsel and advise him in peace either Judicially in matters of Law brought before the King in his Palace which in those days was the only place of Royal justice or Politically in the great affairs of the Kingdom Hereupon they were not only call'd Praetorianum consilium as belonging to the King's Palace but Magnum concilium Regis and Magnum concilium Regni For that in those times it belonged only to them to consult with the King on State-matters and matters of the Kingdom insomuch as no other in the Kingdom possessed any thing but under them And therefore as in Despotical Government the agreement or disagreement of the Master of the Family concluded the menial and the whole Family so the agreement and disagreement of the chief Lord or him that held in Capite concluded all that depended on him or claimed under him in any matter touching his Fee or Tenure To this purpose seemeth that in the Laws of Edward the Confessor ratified by the Conqueror Debet etiam Rex omnia ritè facere in regno per judicium procâ—rum regni These great Lords according to this Archetype of Government set them by the King divided their lands in like manner among their Tenants and followers First they assign'd a portion ad victum vestitum suum which they committed over to their Socmen and Husbandmen to furnish them with Corn Victuals and Provision for Hospitality and briefly all things necessary to their domestical and civil part of life The residue they divided into as many shares or portions as might well maintain so many Military men whom then they call'd their Knights and thereupon the shares themselves Knights-fees i. e. stipendia militaria And these Fees they granted over to each of their principal followers furnishing them with so many Knights for the wars These Grantees that receiv'd their Estates from the Barons or Capitanei and not from the King were called Valvasores a degree above Knights and were unto their Lords the Capitanei or Barones Regis as they the Capitanei were unto the King and did in like manner subdivide their lands among their Socmen and Military followers who in old time were call'd Valvasini whom I take to be the same at this day that are the Lords of every Mannour if not those themselves that we call Knights as owners of a Knights-Fee For in this the Feodal-law it self is doubtful and various as of a thing lost by Antiquity or made uncertain by the differing manners of several Nations Insomuch that Valvasores and Valvasini grew to be confounded and both of them at last to be out of use and no other Military Tenures to be known amongst us than tenere pâ—r Baroniam and tenere per feodum militare But in a Charter of Henr. I. it is said Si exurgat Placitum de divisione Terrarum si interest Barones meos Dominicos tractetur in Curia mea si inter Vavassores duorum Dominorum tractetur in Comitatu c. Where the Valvasores were also and the Barons themselves Suitors and Attendants Bracton mentioneth them in Henry III's time to be Viri magnae dignitatis Nor was their memory clean gone in Richard II's days as appeareth by Chaucer Yet do I not find in any of our ancient Laws or Monuments that they stood in any classick kind of Tenure other than that we may account the Baron Vavasor and Knight to be as our Lawyers at this day term them the Chief Lord Mesne and Tenant But herein the Feodal-law of our Country differ'd from that of Milan and other parts For there the Valvasini could invest which we call infeosse none under them in fee that is to hold of them by Knights-service And with us every Tenant Par aval might in infinitum till the Statute of Quia Emptores Terrarum enfeoffe another by Knight-service and to do all the services unto him that he did to his Mesne Lord. So that by this means a line of Knights-services might be created of a dozen yea twenty Mean-Lords and Tenants wherein every of them might have his prochine Tenant obliged unto him in the duties and services that his Lord Paramont which held of the King was to do and yeild unto the King himself for the same lands viz. Honour Ward Sustenance   Safety Marriage  give keep  Attendance Relief Counsel to Aid Defence of his Person Tribute Fidelity  Defence of his Patrimony     All which in ancient time while the Feodal-law flourished were well understood to be comprehended under the profession of Homage and the oath of Fidelity which every Feodal Tenant or as others call him Vassal usually did unto his Lord. Honour promis'd by the Tenant upon his knees in doing Homage which tho' it be the greatest and most submiss service that a Freeman can do unto his Lord yet the profession of it to the meanest subject is as ample and submiss yea in the very same words that to the King himself Attendance to follow and attend him in the war at his own charge and in peace with suite of Court Therefore Tacitus calleth them Comites Defence of his person for if he forsook his Lord being in danger it was forfeiture of life land and all he had Defence of his Signiory that nothing of his lands rents or services were withholden or withdrawn Profit by Ward Marriage and Relief as they fell Tribute by way of Aid to make his eldest son a Knight to marry his eldest daughter ransom himself being taken prisoner yea in some places to be an hostage for his Lord. Sustenance that being faln into poverty according to that in the Canon law spoken of a Patron Alatur egenus Counsel and Advice in which respect the Tenant was bound ordinarily once in every three weeks to come to his Lord's Court and there as a Judge with other of his Peers to censure the causes of his Signiory and to direct his Lord as the cause occurrent did require and always to keep his counsel This to the meanest Lord was in the nature of the King 's Great Court or Counsel call'd afterward a Parlyment Fidelity for
inter manus habens alicubi retinetur ibi purgetur vel sordidetur si solum inculpatio plegiis si opus est datis ubi justum fuerit terminanda revertatur CHAP. XII The Terms laid out according to these ancient Laws TO lay out now the bounds of the Terms according to these Canons and Constitutions especially that ancient Law of Edward the Confessour it thus appeareth viz. Hilary-Term began then certainly at Octabis Epiphaniae that is the thirteenth day of January seven days before the first Return it now hath and nine days before our Term beginneth and ended at the Saturday next before Septuagesima which being moveable made this Term longer in some years than in others Florentius Wigorniensis and Walsingham in his Hypodigma Neustriae saith Anno 1096. In Octabis Epiphaniae apud Sarisburiam Rex Gulielmus Rufus tenuit Consilium in quo jussit Gulielmi de Anco in duâ—llo victi oculos eruere testiculos abscindere Dapiferum illius Gulielmum de Alderi filium amitae illius suspendi c. proceeding also judicially against others Tho' Walsingham calleth this Consilium with an s a Counsel and Wigorniensis Concilium with a c an Assembly the word Term perhaps not being in use under William Rufus yet it seemeth to be no other than an Assembly of the Barons in the King's house or Court of State which was then the ordinary place of Justice for crimes of this nature For the Barons of the Land were at that time Judges of all causes which we call Pleas of the Crown and of all other belonging to the Court of the King The proceeding also against these offenders seemeth meerly Legal and not Parliamentary or ex arbitrio For the tryal was according to Law by Battel and the judgement after the manner of the time by putting out the eyes and mutilation of the privy members As for putting men to death I confess that it was not at this time ordinary For William the Conquerour had made a Law Interdico nequis occidatur vel suspendatur pro aliqua culpa sed eruantur oculi abscindantur testiculi But as himself observ'd it not so his Son made not nice in breaking of it And I think the Barons of that time did in many things especially crimes of Treason ex arbitrio judicare Besides this if it had been other than an ordinary course of justice they would not have call'd it Consilium or Concilium simply but magnum Concilium or commune Concilium Regni as the phrase then was for Parliaments Lastly tho' it had been a Parliament yet they could not or at least they would not break the Constitutions of the Church by medling with tryals of crime and blood in diebus pacis Ecclesiae and therefore we must conceive it to be done in Term-time diebus pacis Regis as the Canons alledg'd and assign'd it I meet also with a precedent to this purpose in Radevicus under the year 1160. whereby it appears that they began their Term or Law-day likwise beyond the Seas at Octabis Epiphaniae Curia says he quae in Octavis Epiphaniae Papiae fuerat indicta usque in sextam feriam proxime ante caput jejunii quia in destructione Cremae dominus Imperator detinebatur est dilata The Norman Custumary sheweth also expresly that this Term began at Octabis Epiphaniae in saying that their Law-days began and went out with the times of celebrating Marriage which in this part of the year as we shewed before came in at Octab. Epiphaniae and went out at Septuagesima as it still doth And the Court of the Arches doth still hold the same beginning The Exchequer also being brought out of Normandy seemeth to retain at this day the steps of the Norman Custume For in that it openeth eight days before the beginning of the Term it openeth upon the matter at Octabis Epiphaniae By which it appeareth that it was then no Vacation and that the Term was begun at Octabis Epiphaniae whereby it is the likelyer also that it ended at Septuagesima lest beginning it as we now do it might fall out some years to have no Hilary-Term at all as shall anon appear And this our ancient use of ending the Term at Septuagesima is some inducement to think the Council of Erpford is depraved and that the word there Quinquagesima should be Septuagesima as the gloss there reporteth it to be in some other place And as well Gratian mistakes this as he hath done the Council it self attributing it to Ephesus a City of Ionia instead of Erpford a Town in Germany where Burchard before him and Binius since do now place it It comes here to my mind what I have heard an old Chequer-man many years ago report that this Term and Trinity-Term were in ancient time either no Terms at all or but as reliques of Michaelmass and Easter-Terms rather than just Terms of themselves Some courses of the Chequer yet encline to it And we were both of the mind that want of business which no doubt in those days was very little by reason Suits were then for the most part determined in inferiour Courts might be the cause thereof But I since observe another cause viz. That Septuagesima or Church-time one while trode so near upon the heels of Octabis Epiphaniae I mean came so soon after it as it left not a whole week for Hilary-Term and again another while Trinity Sunday fell out so late in the year that the common necessity of Hay-seed and Harvest made that Term very little and unfrequented For insomuch as Easter which is the Clavis as well to shut up Hilary-Term as to open Trinity-Term may according to the general Council of Nice holden in the year 322. fall upon any day between the 21 st of March exclusively which then was the Aequinoctium and the 25. of April inclusively as the farthest day that the Sunday following the Vernal Full-Moon can happen upon Septuagesima may sometimes be upon the eighteenth of January and then could they in ancient time not have above four days Term and we at this day no Term at all because we begin it not till the 23 d. of January which may be six days after Septuagesima and within the time of Church-Vacation But what Hilary-Term hath now lost at the beginning of it it hath gained at the latter ending Of Trinity-Term I shall speak more by and by CHAP. XIII Easter-Term EAster-Term which now beginneth two days after Quindena Paschae began then as the Law of Edward the Confessour appointed it at Octabis This is verified by Glanvil who maketh one of his Writs returnable thus Rex c. Summone per bonos summonitores quatuor legales milites de vicineto de Stock quod sint ad Clausum Paschae coram me vel Justiciis meis apud Westmonasterium ad eligendum supra sacramentum suum duodecim legales milites But as it began then nine days
beginning of this Term viz. Octabis Sancti Michaelis à die Sancti Michaelis in quindecim dies and consequently making the beginning of it fall a fortnight later than before Wherefore the first day in this Term will always be the twenty third day of October unless it happen to be Sunday for then it must be defer'd till the day following upon which account we find it accordingly placed on the twenty fourth for the year 1681. This is all the alteration that Statute mentions and therefore for the end of Michaelmass-Term I refer the Reader to what our Author has said already in the 15 th Chapter It may not be amiss in pursuit of our Author's method to set down the motives of making this abbreviation as we find them reckon'd up in the Preamble to that Statute There we find that the old beginning of Michaelmass-term was generally found to be very inconvenient to his Majesty's subjects both Nobles and others First For the keeping of Quarter-sessions next after the feast of St. Michael the Archangel Secondly For keeping their Leets Law-days and Court-Barons Thirdly For the sowing of land with Winter-corn the same being the chief time of all the year for doing it Fourthly For the disposing and setting in order of all their Winter husbandry and business Fifthly For the receiving aud paying of Rents Sixthly Because in many parts of this Kingdom especially the most Northern Harvest is seldom or never Inned till three weeks after the said Feast All which affairs they could before by no means attend in regard of the necessity of their coming to the said Term so speedily after the feast of St. Michael the Archangel to appear upon Juries and to follow their Causes and Suits in the Law SECT V. Other Considerations concerning Term-time HAving thus laid out the frame of the Terms both according to the Ancient and Modern Constitutions it remaineth that we speak something of other points properly incident to this part of our division touching Term-time viz. 1. Why the Courts sit not in the Afternoons 2. Why not upon some whole days as on Grand-days double Feasts and other exempted days and the reason of them 3. Why some Law business may be done on days exempted 4. Why the end of Michaelmass-Term is sometimes holden in Advent and of Hilary-Term in Septuagesima Sexagesima and Quinquagesima 5. Why the Assizes are holden in Lent and at times generally prohibited by the Church 6. Of Returns 7. Of the Quarta dies post 8. Why I have cited so much Canon Civil Feodal and foreign Laws in this discourse with an excursion into the original of our Laws CHAP. I. Why the High Courts sit not in the Afternoons IT is now to be considered why the high Courts of Justice sit not in the Afternoons For it is said in Exodus that Moses judged the Israelites from Morning to Evening And the Romans used the Afternoon as well as the Forenoon yea many times the Afternoon and not the Forenoon as upon the days called Endotercismi or Intercisi whereof the Forenoon was Nefastus or Vacation and the Afternoon Fastus or Law-day as we shewed in the beginning And the Civilians following that Law do so continue them amongst us in their Term at this day But our Ancestours and other the Northern Nations being more prone to distemper and excess of diet as the Canon Law noteth of them used the Forenoon only lest repletion should bring upon them drowsiness and oppression of spirit according to that of St. Jerome Pinguis Venter non gignit mentem tenuem To confess the truth our Saxons as appeareth by Huntington were immeasurably given to drunkenness And it is said in Ecclesiastes Vae Terrae cujus Principes mane comedunt Therefore to avoid the inconvenience depending hereon the Council of Nice ordained that Judices non nisi jejuni leges judicia decernant And in the Council of Salegunstad it was after decreed Vt lectio Nicaeni Concilii recitetur which being done in the words aforesaid the same was likewise there confirm'd According to this in the Laws of Carolus Magnus the Emperour it is ordained Logobard lib. 2. Vt Judices jejuni causas audiant discernant and again in the Capitulars Caroli Lodovici ne placitum Comes habeat nisi jejunus Where the word Comes according to the phrase of that time is used for Judex as elsewhere we have at large declared To the same effect is the Capitular ad Legem Salicam and out of these and such other Constitutions ariseth the rule of the Canon Law that Quae à prandio fiunt Consultationes inter decreta non referuntur Yet I find that Causes might be heard and judged in the Afternoon for in Capitulars lib. 2. Can. 33. and again lib. 4. Can. 16. it is said Causae viduarum pupillorum pauperum audiantur definiantur ante Meridiem Regis vero Potentium post Meridiem Which tho' it seem contradictory to the Constitutions aforesaid yet I conceive them to be thus reconcilable that the Judges sitting then but seldom continued their Courts both Forenoon and Afternoon from Morning till Evening without dinner or intermission as at this day they may and often do upon great Causes tho' being risen and dining they might not meet again yet might they not sit by night or use candle light Quod de nocte non est honestum judicium exercere And from these ancient Rites of the Church and Empire is our Law derived which prohibiteth our Jurours being Judices de facto to have meat drink fire or candle-light till they be agreed of their verdict It may be here demanded how it cometh to pass that our Judges after dinner do take Assizes and Nisi prius in the Guild-hall of London and in their Circuits I have yet no other answer but that ancient Institutions are discontinued often by some custom grating in upon them and changed often by some later Constitution of which kind the instances aforesaid seem to be For Assizes were ordained many ages after by Henry II. as appeareth by the Charter of Beverly Glanvil and Radulphus Niger and Nisi prius by Edward I. in the Statutes of Westminster 2. tho' I see not but in taking of them the ancient course might have been continued if haste would suffer it CHAP. II. Why they sit not at all some days THough there be many days in the Terms which by ancient Constitutions before recited are exempted from Law-business as those of the Apostles c. and that the Statute of Edw. VI. appointed many of them to be kept holy-days as dedicated not unto Saints but unto divine worship which we also at this day retain as holy-days Yet do not the high Courts forbear sitting in any of them saving on the feast of the Purification the Ascension St. John Baptist All-Saints and the day after tho' not a feast called All-souls When
homicidium casu commissions culpa non praecedente non est imputandum And Sibi imputari non debet quia fortuitos casus qui praevideri non possunt non praevidit And De casu fortuito nullus tenetur cum praevideri non possit And upon this the stream of the Canonists do run as by a multitude of Books may be shew'd with whom our Bracton a great Civilian and Common Lawyer too Homicidium casuale non imputatur 5. The two heads whereto the Law looketh freeing a man from blame and expresly from Irregularity are that the person by whom the Action is perform d do not dare operam rei illicitae and that he use diligence of his part that no hurt be committed Azorius the Jesuite saith Irregularitas cum ob delictum constituitur non nisi ex lethali peccato contrahitur nisi ex homicidio fiat quis irregularis eo quod det operam rei vetitae interdictae nam tunc quamvis homicidium casu sequatur ob culpam nostram levem vel levissimam multorum est opinio irregularitatem contrahi And Ivo in his Canons some hundreds of years before him Si duo fratres in sylva arbores succiderint appropinquante casura unius arboris frater fratri dixerit Cave ille fugiens in pressuram arboris inciderit ac mortuus fuerit vivens frater innocens de sanguine germani dijudicatur Now the caâ—e at Bramsil is within the compass of these two conditions For the party agent was about no unlawful work for what he did was in the day in the presence of fourty or fifty persons the Lord Zouch who was owner of the Park not only standing by but inviting to Hunt and Shoot and all persons in the Field were call'd upon to stand far off partly for avoiding harm and partly lest they should disturb the Game and all in the Field perform'd what was desir'd And this course did the Lord Arch-bishop use to take when or wheresoever he did shoot as all persons at any time present can witness never any man being more solicitous thereof than he evermore was And the morning when the deed was done the Keeper was twice warn'd to stay behind and not to run forward but he carelesly did otherwise when he that shot could take no notice of his galloping in before the Bow as may be seen by the Verdict of the Coroner's Inquest 6. This case at Bramsill is so favourable that the strictest Writers of these times directly conclude that if a Clergy-man committing casuale homicidium be about a forbidden and interdicted act yet he is not irregular if the interdicted act be not therefore forbidden because it may draw on Homicide And thereupon inasmuch as Hunting is forbidden in a Clergy-man not in respect of danger of Life but for Decency that he should not spend his time in Exercises which may hinder him from the study fit for his Calling or for other such reasons Irregularity followeth not thereupon And to this purpose writeth at large Soto Covarruvias and Suarez who are great Canonists and Schoolmen And if this be true as out of great reason it may be so held how much further is the present case in question from Irregularitie 7. But some go directly to the point and say that the Lord Arch-bishop did navare operam rei illicitae because he was on Hunting for that was interdicted to a Bishop by the Canon De Clerico Venatore and so by a consequent he must needs be Irregular To which objection see how many clear and true answers there be As first that the Canon being taken out of the Decrees is by Gratian himself branded to be Palea no better than Chaff Secondly it is cited out of the fourth Council of Orleans and there is no such thing to be found as the Gloss well observeth Thirdly it forbiddeth Hunting cum canibus aut accipitribus and none of these were at Bramsil And if you will enforce it by comparison or proportion the rule of the Law is Favores sunt ampliandi odia restringenda Where mark when Hunting with Dogs or Hawks is forbidden it is not for fear of Slaughter for there is no such danger in either of them Fourthly the Canon forbiddeth Hunting voluptatis causa but not recreationis or valetudinis gratia which the Books say is permitted etiam Episcopo Fifthly the Canon hath Si saepius detentus fuerit if he make a Life or Occupation of it which the world knoweth is not the Arch-bishop's case but a little one time in the year directed so by his Physician to avoid two diseases whereunto he is subject the Stone and the Gout Sixthly it is clamosa venatio against which the Canon speaketh not quieta or modesta which the Canonists allow and this whereof the question ariseth was most silent and quiet saving that this accident by the Keeper's unadvised running in hath afterwards made a noise over all the Countrey 8. These Exceptions as they naturally and without any enforcing give answer to this Objection of the Canon so there is another thing that may stop the mouth of all Gain-sayers if any Reason will content them And that is that by the Stat. of Henr. VIII 35. ca. 16. no Canon is in force in England which was not in use before that time or is not contrary or derogatory to the Laws or Statutes of this Realm nor to the Prerogatives of the Royal Crown of which nature this is For in Charta de Foresta Archbishops and Bishops by name have liberty to Hunt and 13. Ric. II. cap. 13. a Clergy-man who hath 10l. by the year may keep grey-hounds to hunt And Linwood who liv'd soon after that time and understood the Ecclesiastical Constitutions and the Laws of England very well in treating of Hunting speaketh against Clergy-men using that exercise unlawfully as in places restrain'd or forbidden but hath not one word against Hunting simply And the Arch-bishop of Canterbury had formerly more than twenty Parks and Chaces of his own to use at his pleasure and now by Charter hath free-warren in all his lands And by ancient Record the Bishop of Rochester at his death was to render to the Arch-bishop of Canterbury his Kennel of Hounds as a mortuary whereof as I am credibly inform'd the Law taketh notice for the King Sede vacante under the name of Muta canum and Mulctura To this may be added the perpetuated use of Hunting by Bishops in their Parks continu'd to this day without scruple or question As that most Reverend man the Lord Arch-bishop Whitgyfte us'd in Hartlebury-park while he liv'd at Worcester in Ford-park in Kent in the Park of the Lord Cobham near Canterbury where by the favour of that Lord he kill'd twenty Bucks in one journey using Hounds Grey-hounds or his Bow at his pleasure although he never Shot well And the same is credibly reported of the Lord Arch-bishop Sandes And it is most true that the
to the former Rate of sive groats to the ounce do you think that things would then be sold for so many shillings or pounds as they now be I warrant you No. Then is it the unstable value of our former Coins that so much deceiveth a great number For look into such things as have always retain'd an uniform content and you shall find little difference between our and the former times in giving one of those things for another For at this day you may buy a Cow for as few Sheep as you could then and a Horse for as few Cows The Land that was then lett with us in Norfolk for 8d. or 10d. the acre and now for eight groats or three shillings was in those days also let for a coumbe of Barley and yet will not now be hired at so great a Rate Viand You have answer'd me beyond my expectation but yet not fully satisfy'd me For tho' I allow you these proportions yet there remaineth a great diversitie For I have read that in old time a quarter of Wheat was sold at London for 2s. a fat Ox for a noble a fat Sheep for 6d. or 8d. half a dozen of Pigeons for a peny a fat Goose for 2d. a Pig for a peny and other things after that Rate And yet I grant that a Man in letting or selling his Land for Corn Cattel and such like or ware for ware might in those days have as much as he can get now Selv. The time you speak of was about the 10 th of Edw. III. and the like hath been at other times also And when the cause hereof is well consider'd you shall find another right good reason why things should be sold for more mony now than they were then and yet no whit at all dearer and that is the plenty and abundance of plate and mony which at this day is to be found in England more than ever was in time past For it is not our Commodities that be grown dearer but Gold and Silver are become more common and of less estimation than they were wont Insomuch that whereas Plate was dainty in Great-men's Houses it ruffleth now even at the meanest Tables and mony is so little respected as we will give great store thereof for a small Commodity Like as in the days of Solomon Silver was so plentiful as it was nothing esteem'd no it was holden so base a mettal as Solomon would not make one vessel thereof no not for his own service much less for the Temple of God Yet afterward it became so scarce as when Joash undertook to repair the Temple he was driven to tax the people for it that thereby he might have wherewith to pay the work-men and whereon to make the holy Vessels So King Edw. III. having with effusion of much Treasure ended his Scottish Wars and determin'd to begin afresh with France practised such means to recover mony to supply these charges as he got so much into his hands that Writers report it was very scant and hard to be come by through the whole Realm And hereupon proceeded the cheapness that you speak of Men were constrained to give a great deal of ware for a little mony because they could have no other chaffer for their Commodities But from these particular Contingents you must not raise general Consequents for in that sort I can shew unto you that things were much dearer before the time you speak of than they are now As in 22. Edw. I. a quarter of Wheat was sold for 30s. So in the time of Richard I. all things were so exceeding dear for three or four years together that a quarter of Wheat was then sold for 18 â— 8 â— a strange price if you consider the alay of mony then currant and this was almost 400. years agoe Also in the year 1289. Edw. I. 17. Wheat was ordinarily sold for 2s. the bushel and continued at that price almost fourty years together rising oftentimes to 10s. the bushel and sometimes to a mark and above as in the year 1317. and in these days other things bare price accordingly I could put you many Examples more if these sufficed not but sure I am of mind that all occurrents rightly weigh'd things be little or nothing dearer than in ancient time Viand You say sore unto me if you make it apparent that mony were so plentiful as you affirm it For my own part I am sure I have little enough Selv. And I too but that is not the matter For what store of sap soever the tree hath yet many spriggs and leaves do wither away for want thereof The great ones have it I warrant you and that ultra modum but to our matter Two things are the causes thereof It is brought in more plentifully than in ancient times and carryed out more sparingly Brought in more plentifully in respect of greater traffick that we have had within these latter years even to all places in the World by which we have utter'd our own Commodities at the dearest and fetcht the foreign from the original places which with far greater charge we were wont to buy at second hand Viand Yea marry Sir the less we have of some of that trafficking the better I think for England For by this means they carry from us our good Corn Wooll Cloth Copper Lead Tinn and such like rich Commodities and the sustenance of our Countrey and return us for them excess of Lawn Camrick Plums Spice Suckets and other lascivious trumpery whereby effeminate delicacie is crept in amongst us and our warlike reputation put in peril to be lost This kind of traffick may well be term'd Glauci Diomedis permutatio Doth the wealth and mony you speak of come into England by this means Selv. Nothing less There be other good merchandise enough as Pitch Tar Iron Copper Deal Madder Woad Cutchaneale and such like and yet those you speak of are in some measure necessary But by our traffick into foreign Countries tho' we many times bring home light and frivolous toys yet they are often accompanied with Gold and Silver both in Coin and Bullion Besides you know that the Treasure according to my capacity is infinite which in these later years hath been unshipp'd in England Viand True but goeth it not out as merrily think you as it cometh in or not so fast as it did in times past Selv. That is the other point to be consider'd of and I know by certain speeches utter'd in the last Parliament that her Majestie 's occasions to disperse it are exceeding great and urgent yet a principal part thereof runneth as in a circle up and down the Land And tho' she sendeth much beyond the Seas for entertainment of her Bands and Garisons and executing of her other Royal purposes yet doth she therein but as all her Renown'd Progenitors have done before her For neither England nor any other Realm in Europe have ever wanted this kind of issue But the reasons
that make me think that our wealth should continue with us better now than in times past it hath done are for that the Roman-coffers are not now glutted as they have been with English-treasure continually flowing into them For it is a world to consider the huge stocks of mony that those cozening Prelates have heretofore extorted out of her Majesties Kingdoms by their Antichristian and usurpt Supremacie As by Pope Innocent constraining King John to redeem his Crown at his hands and to take it for ever in farm for the yearly rent of 1000. marks to be paid to him and his Successors By causing Henry III. to maintain his wars against Frederick the Emperor and Conrade King of Sicil By drawing from our Kings many contributions and benevolences By laying upon their Subjects as well temporal as spiritual tenths and taxes in most ravenous manner and that very often So that in the time of Henry III. the Realm was by such an extream tax mightily impoverished as our Chronicles witness as also at many other times since and before For when the Pope was disposed to use mony he would tax our people as if they had been his natural Subjects by many Congratulations of the Clergy as 11000. marks at one pull to Pope Innocent IV. by private Remembrances from single Bishops as 9500. marks from the Arch-bishop of York to Pope Clement V. in An. 34. or 35. Edw. I. and from divers of them jointly 6000. marks to the foresaid Innocent By their rich Revenue of the First-fruits and Tenths as well of the Archbishopricks as of all other Spiritual Livings now reannext unto the Crown by the Parliament in the first of her Majesty By Installing Consecrating and Confirming Bishops By dealing Benefices By appellations to the Church of Rome By giving definitive Sentences By distributing heavenly Grace By granting Pardons and Faculties By dispensations of Marriages Oaths and such like By selling their blessed trumpery and many such other things that I cannot reckon whereof that merchandizing Prelate knoweth full well how to make a Commoditie according to the saying of Mantuan Venalia nobis Templa Sacerdotes Altaria sacra Coronae Ignis thura preces coelum est Venale Deusque All this consider'd and that the summs of mony by them receiv'd before the time of Henry VIII were according to the value of our Coin at this day three times as much as before is shewed you must needs confess that the fat of the Land larded the Roman dishes whilst our selves teer'd upon the lean-bones Besides it must not be forgotten that one tenth granted to the Pope impoverisht the Realm more than ten unto the King For what the King had was at length return'd again among the Subjects little thereof going out of the Land much like the life-blood which tho' it shifteth in divers parts yet still continueth it self within the body But whatsoever came into St. Peter's pouch was lockt up with the infernal key Et ab infernis nulla est redemptio England might lick her lips after that it came no more among her people Thus we were made the Bees of Holy-Church suffer'd to work and store our hives as well as we could but when they waxed any thing weighty his Legates were sent to drive them and fetch away the honey Yea if his Holyness were sharp sett indeed he would not stick to use a trick of Husbandry rather burn the Bees than want the honey I may tell you too his Legates and Nuncio's were ever trim fellows at licking of the hive as in our Chronicles you may read abundantly Viand You have made the matter so plain that I must needs grant that our treasure goeth not out of the Land in any comparable measure as it did in times past For as you say tho' these actions of the Low-Countries France Portugal and other places hath somewhat suck'd us yet I consider that we have ever had such a vent even in the several days of our Kings as in the time of Queen Mary King Edw. VI. King Henry VIII c. Selv. Their occasions indeed are best known unto us because many men living were witnesses thereof But I will recite unto you cursorily somewhat of the rest that you may the better be satisfy'd that it is no novelty in England And for to begin with Henry II. what store of treasure think you was by him and his wasteful sons whereof two namely Henry and John were Kings as well as himself daily carry'd into France Flanders Saxony Sicil Castile the holy-Holy-land and other places sometime about their wars and turbulent affairs other some time for Royal expence about meeting feasting and entertaining the French King the Pope foreign Princes and such other occasions the particular whereof were too long to recite But we may well think that England must needs sweat for it in those days to feed the riotous hands of three several Kings spending so much of their time on the other side the Seas as they did The like was done by Richard I. about his ransome and business with the Emperor and Leopold Duke of Austria about his wars in France and the Holy-land where it is said that by estimation he spent more in one month than any of his predecessors ever did in a whole year By Henry III. about the affected Kingdom of Sicil and his wars in Gascoigne and other parts of France and in bounty to strangers He at one time sent into France at the direction of the Poictovins 30. barrels of Starling Coin for payment of foreign Souldiers and at another time these his wasteful expences being cast up the summ amounted to 950000. marks which after the rate of our allay encreaseth to By Edw. I. about his Actions of Guien Gascoigne France Flanders and the Conquest of Scotland and the striking of a League with Adolph the Emperor Guy Earl of Flanders John Duke of Brabant Henry Earl of Bar Albert Duke of Austria and others against the French King and Earl Jo. of Henault his partaker By Edw. III. about his Victories and designs in France and elsewhere which exhausted so much treasure as little or none almost remain'd in the Land as before is shewed By Henry IV. about the stirs of Britain and in supportation of the confederate faction of Orleance By Henry V. about his Royal Conquest of France By Edw. IV. in aiding the Duke of Burgundy and in revenging himself upon the King of France By Henry VII about his wars in France in annoying the Flemings in assisting the Duke of Savoy and Maximilian King of the Romans I need not speak of Henry VIII whose foreign Expences as they were exceeding great so they are sufficiently known to most men Neither have I more than lightly run over the rest who besides these that I have spoken of had many other foreign charges of great burden and much importance and yet not so much as once touch'd by me as Marriage of their Children with foreign Princes Treaties
now to our greater enrichment return'd again amongst us by dissolution of these Popish Ceremonies Viand You may also reckon the mony given to maintenance of Priests Monkery Lights Obits Anniversaries and all the plate and treasure of the Clergy at that time to be of the same sort Selv. That did Edward the first well consider and therefore to the end that he might dig it out of the grave and bring it abroad again among the people that had need thereof he suffer'd the matter to be so handl'd by one of his Treasurers that certain Captains appointed to work the feat placing their Souldiers in every quarter through the Realm made search at one time in July at three of the clock in the afternoon for all such mony were it hid or laid up in hallowed places and taking the same away brought it unto the King who dissembling the matter as he that stood in need excused the act done by his Treasurer and thought it no offence but rather a good work Besides all this there is yet another means whereby the Treasure of our Land must needs be much encreased and that is by divers good Laws and Statutes made both for causing it to be brought into the Realm and also for containing it within the lists of the same when it is come And that is by the Stat. 14. Edw. III. whereby it was enacted that every man denizen or stranger that should transport any wooll out of the Land should find sufficient sureties to bring again unto the King's Exchange for every sack of wooll transported plates of Silver to the value of two marks And by the Statute of 3. Henry V. confirm'd and quickned by 32. Hen. VI. which provided that every Merchant-stranger buying wooll in England not coming to the Staple to be sold shall bring to the Master of the Mint of the Tower of London of every sack one ounce of Bullion of Gold and in the same manner of three pieces of Tin one ounce of Bullion of Gold or the value in Bullion of Silver upon pain of forfeiture of the same Woolls and Tin or the value thereof to the King It is provided also for containing of mony within the Land that all Merchant-strangers shall employ all the mony receiv'd by them within this Realm upon the Merchandise and Commodities of this Realm deducting their reasonable expences and that they shall give sufficient surety for doing hereof and the trespasser to forfeit and be punished grievously as in the Statutes is contain'd 3. Hen. VII affirming and enlarging 14. Edw. IV. and many other of like effect And by 4. Hen. VII that no man dwelling in England shall pay or deliver wittingly to any Merchant or other born out of the King's obedience for any Merchandise or Wares or in any other wise any Gold coined Plate Vessels Bullion Jewels of Gold or Silver upon pain of forfeiture thereof And by 14. Edw. IV. affirm'd by 4. Hen. VII and for a time continued by 1. and 3. Henry VIII with a mitigation of the bloody penalty all men except such as had the King's Licence or were dispensed with by those Statutes were utterly inhibited from carrying out of the Realm any manner of Coin plate vessel massy Bullion jewels of Gold or Silver Which Law and many other of the like effect tho' they continue not now in force yet the fruit thereof remaineth to us still as Children enrich'd by their Fathers sparings Besides it is not altogether to be passed in silence that our treasure is somewhat increased by the Gold and Silver try'd out of our own Mines here in England Which tho' it be little or nothing in respect that in this latter age we have wimbl'd even into the bowels of Plutus's Treasury the Western Indies yet is it so much as our Historiographers both new and ancient have thought it worth the noting and all our Kings from time to time have made especial account of as well appeareth by a multitude of Leases thereof granted by them to many noble Personages extant in the Checquer Records and also by the process and argument of the Earl of Northumberland's Case concerning a Copper-mine 10. Eliz. which in Plowden's Commentaries is at large reported But be it little or great Many littles as our Adage saith make a great and continual accession amasseth at length to a mighty thing as is well seen in the Hill Testacchio in Rome which standing in a plain and being about half a mile in compass and exceeding in height any Tower in the Town-wall is said to have been made of the shards of the potts wherein the tribute-mony was brought to Rome or as pleaseth rather the more Learned sort of broken potts thrown out of the VII College of Potters built by Numa Pompilius But be it the one or other the semblance serves my turn and there 's an end THE PLACES or DWELLINGS OF THE ARCH-BISHOPS and BISHOPS of this Realm Now or of former times in which Houses their several Owners have Ordinary Jurisdiction and be as parcel of their Diocess as is recited in the Stat. of 33. Hen. VIII ca. 31. altho' they be situate within the precinct of another Bishop's Diocess 1. THe Lords Arch-bishops of CANTERBURY of long time enjoyed and do enjoy Lambeth-house as appeareth in Historia Cantuariensium Archiepiscoporum set forth as is thought by Dr. Ackworth in the Lord Arch-bishop Parker's time The which house was never severed from the Lord Arch-bishop's See of Canterbury since the annexion thereof to that See 2. The house at Lambeth-marsh commonly call'd Carlisle-house was the Bishop of ROCHESTER'S Palace until about 26. Hen. VIII as appeareth in the foresaid Historia Cantuariensis and also in the Act of Parliament of 22. Hen. VIII ca. 9. made against poysoning whereby it doth appear that the house of John Bishop of Rochester was at Lambeth-marsh But afterwards about An. 27. Hen. VIII or after the same being some ways the Kings was convey'd to Robert Aldridge Bishop of CARLILE and his Successors in exchange for his houses near Ivie-bridge now the Earl of Worcester and Salisbury's and other houses there toward the Street and of a yearly Rent of 16l. or thereabouts out of those houses given to the Bishop of Carlile and his Successors for those houses formerly call'd Carlile-place But the said Bishop Aldridge leas'd the house of Lambeth-marsh for some small and not valuable Rent for divers years yet enduring 3. The Bishop of ROCHESTER had given for his Palace to dwell in certain houses lately call'd Rochester-house near adjoining to Winchester-place and sometime as it is reported parcel of the possessions of the Priory of St. Swithins in Winchester but that place is lately divided into several little dwellings 4 WINCHESTER Place with the liberty of the Prison of the Clynke and Bancke belonged and doth belong to the Bishop of Winchester and the house was in Edw. the Sixth's time conveyed to the Marquess of
Northampton who builded the gallery there but in Queen Mary's time the same was restored to that See where it so continueth 5. The Lord Arch-bishop of YORK'S house was the White-hall much enlarg'd and reedify'd by the Cardinal Wolsey then Arch-bishop of York as by the Arms remaining in wood stone and glass in sundry places of that house may appear And after the said Cardinals conviction of Premunire and Death the same was made parcel of the King's Palace at Westminster by purchase from the Arch-bishop of York as appeareth by the Stat. of 28. Hen. VIII ca. 12. But afterwards until anno 2. or 3. of Queen Mary the Arch-bishop of York had no other dwelling-place near London in right of his See or by reason of his Arch-bishoprick but the house at Battersey and then Queen Mary gave to Arch-bishop Heath and his Successors the late Duke of Suffolk's house called Suffolk-place in Southwark which the Arch-bishop of York by confirmation of the Dean and Chapter there shortly after sold away to others and purchased to his See York-place where the Lord Chancellor remaineth together with the houses adjoining to the Street Which house was sometime the Bishop of Norwich's Place and the same among all or the greatest part of the possessions of the See of Norwich about an 27. Hen. VIII were convey'd to the King by a private Act of Parliament in recompence of the union of the Monastery of St. Bennets and the possessions thereof to that Bishoprick being of far better value than the ancient Lands of the Bishoprick of Norwich assur'd to the King as is recited in the Statute of 32. Hen. VIII ca. 47. whereby the Bishop of Norwich is made Collector of the Tenths of his Diocess as other Bishops were being formerly free'd thereof by the said private Statute of 27. Hen. VIII Which said now York-place by Hen. VIII was convey'd in fee to Charles Brandon Duke of Suffolk and after the death of the said Duke's sons the coheirs of the Duke's sons sold the same to the said Arch-bishop Heath and his Successors 6. But the Bishop of NORWICH was limited by the said private Act of 27. Henry VIII to enjoy perpetually in succession a Prebend in the Free-Chappel of St. Stephens at Westminster after dissolv'd by the Statute of Dissolution of Colledges and Free-Chappels 1. Ed. VI. and the house thereto belonging in Chanon-row whereof then was incumbent one Knight but the house is said to be Leas'd for some small Rent by the Bishop of Norwich to Sir John Thinn Knight in Edw. the Sixth's time for many years enduring And that the house now call'd York-place was belonging to the Bishop of Norwich is proved by a Case 21. Edw. IV. fol. 73. in a Presentment against the Bishop of Norwich in the King's Bench for annoyance of a way inter hospitium Episcopi Norwicensis Dunelmensis in parochia Sancti Martini in Campis 7. DURHAM-HOUSE as appeareth in that Case was the Bishop of Durham's house and Bishop Tonstal about the 26 th of Hen. VIII convey'd the same to the King in Fee and King Henry VIII in recompence thereof granted to the See of Durham Coldharborrowe and certain other houses in London And after Edw. VI. about an 2. granted Durham-house to the Lady Elizabeth his Sister for life or until she be otherwise advanced After the Bishoprick of Durham by a private Statute not printed of 7. Edw. VI. was dissolved and all the possessions thereof given to King Edw. VI. who shortly after convey'd in Fee the said Bishop's late house at Coldharborrowe and other houses in London to Francis Earl of Shrewsbury and his heirs And after the 2d. Mariae ca. 3. The Stat. of 7. Edw. VI. for dissolving that Bishoprick is repeal'd but the Mansion-house of Coldharborrowe and other Tenements in London so granted to the said Earl be confirm'd And the Bishop by that Act prayeth a recompence from the Queen at his charge Whereupon Queen Mary about anno V. or VI. of her reign granteth to the said Bishop of Durham her reversion of Durham-place in succession which coming into possession by the death of Queen Elizabeth the late Bishop of Durham now Lord Arch-bishop of York enter'd into and enjoy'd the same in the right of his See by opinion of the chief Justices of the Land referr'd by the King being opposed by Sir Walter Rawleigh as likewise doth the now Bishop of Durham 8. The Bishop of LICHFEILD and COVENTRY of old call'd the Bishop of Chester before the new erection of the new Bishoprick of Chester had his Place where Somerset-house is builded 9. 10. As likewise the Bishops of WORCESTER and LANDAFF had there sometime a house as Stow in his Book of Survey of London saith But the said three Bishops Places together with a Parish Church call'd Straunde-Church and the greatest Inn of Chancery call'd Straunde-Inn belonging to the Middle Temple were defaced without recompence to any of the said three last mentioned Bishops Parish Church or Inn of Chancery Other than to the Bishop of WORCESTER who had in respect of his former house a house in the White Fryers which he enjoyeth 11. Arondell-house now the Lord Admiral 's was the Bishop of BATH and WELLS'S and was assured in Edw. VI. time to Admiral Seymer and is now quite sever'd from that Bishoprick without recompence 12. Likewise the Bishop of EXETER'S Place after call'd Paget Leicester and Essex-house of the several Owners of the same And it is thought the Bishop of Exeter hath likewise no recompence for the same of any other house in or near London 13. The Bishop of SARUM'S Place now call'd Dorset-house before call'd Sackvile-house and of former time Salisbury Court being in long Lease made by Bishop Capon who was Bishop there in Hen. VIII Edw. VI. and Queen Mary's time was exchang'd temp Reginae Elizabethae by the great Learned Reverend Father Bishop Jewel for recompence of good value in Lands in his Diocess or elsewhere in the West Country 14. The Bishop of St. DAVID'S Place was near adjoyning to Bridewell upon the ditch that runneth to Fleet-bridge into the Thames and was granted in Fee-farm for a Mark Rent temp Edw. VI. to Dr. Hewick the Physician under which purchase the same is now enjoy'd 15. The Bishop of HEREFORD'S Place as Stow in his Survey of London pag. 357. saith is in the Parish of St. Mary de Monte alto or Mount-halt in London of which Bishops Patronage the said Church also is which Place is in the tenure of the Bishop of Hereford or his Tenants 16. 17. The Bishop of LONDON'S Place at Pauls was never sever'd from the Bishop's possession And likewise ELY Place from the Bishop of that See other than such part thereof as the late Lord Chancellor Hatton had by Lease for many years from the late Bishop Cox 18. The Bishop of BANGOR'S house is or lately was Mr. Aleworth's house
in Shoe-lane by a Lease from the Bishop of that See temp Edw. VI. yeilding some Rose or other small or not valuable Rent 19. The Bishop of LINCOLN'S Place was Southampton-house in Holborn convey'd temp Edw. VI. to the Lord Writoheseley then Lord Chancellor in fee for which the Bishop hath no other house in or near London as is thought 20. The Bishop of CHICHESTERS Place or Palace as Matthew Paris in his Chronicle calleth it reciting the story of the Lord Arch-bishop of Canterbury visiting St. Bartholomews did at that time lye in that house which was in Chancery-lane where Sir Richard Read sometime a Master of the Chancery and Mr. Atkinson the Counsellor at Law and others dwelt and dwell in and is said to be in Lease from the Bishop's Predecessors for divers years What the Rents reserv'd yearly be the Lease will shew the same 21. The Bishop of St. ASAPH never had Place at or near London that I can learn of neither in the valuation of the See where all his Possession and Jurisdictions be valu'd in the First-fruit-office is there mention of any such Place neither doth the now Bishop of that See know the same 22. The Bishop of the ISLE OF MAN call'd Sodorensis Episcopus altho' the same be an ancient Bishoprick yet was he never Lord of the Parliament of England having no Chapter or other Clergy but only an Archdeacon and all the Incumbents of the several Parishes of that Isle And before the said Statute of 33. Hen. VIII was neither a Suffragan of the Province of Were wont in former times to ride on Mares or Mules 119. Prohibited to take cognizance of Wills 129. Blackney Harbour 151. Blicking 151. The birth place of Q. Anna Bullen ibid. Bocland what 12. Not subject to Homage 35. Bond-men anciently not valu'd or rated 15. Reputed only as part of their Master's substance 11 15. Boors who 14. Bouthorpe 157. Bramsil 108 109. Brancaster 147 148. Breakspear Nich. converted Norway 139. Made Cardinal and Pope ibid. Breclys 161. Brennus a Britain invades Greece 3. His attendants ibid. Brictrick a Saxon Thane 22. Britains none of 'em remaining after Cadwallador's departure 100. Their Laws alter'd by the Romans 101. Bronholm 152. Brotherton Tho. Earl of Norfolk and Earl Marshal of England 167. When he dy'd 168. Buckenham 158. Burg-Castle 155. Burghesses of old not call'd to consult of State-matters 64 65. Burghbote and Brugbote 17 22 40. Burnham in Norfolk 149. Burnham-East in Com. Bucks 23. By what it signifies 3. 154. By-laws 3 154. C Cadwallader Prince of the Britains fled into Armorica 100. Calthorp 151. King Canutus how he publish'd his Laws 61. His Constitution touching Festivals 79. Capet Hugh usurpt the Kingdom of France 5 He grants his Nobility a perpetual enjoyment of their Feuds and Honours ibid. 14. Capitales plagii 52. Capitanei Regis regni 58. Caput feodi aut Capitaneus feodi 11. Carbrook 161. Carolus Calvus Emperour and King of France his Synodical Edict 54 55. Carolus Magnus or Charlemaigne divided his Territories between his three Sons 128. Castle-acre 141. Castle-rising in Norfolk the Parson has the Probate of Wills in that Town 130. Caston 151. Castor 155 156. Ceorls who 12. Of two sorts 14. The chiefest part of their profits redounded to their Lords ibid. Their service no bondage ibid. Their valuation and priviledges ibid. Not capable of a Knights Fee ibid. Champain in France 128. Chancery-Court 94. Charta de Foresta 109 114. Charter the first by whom made and where kept 8. Saxon Charters usually writ in that Language ibid. Charters of Thane-lands granted by several Kings 19 20. Chichley Henr. Arch-bishop of Canterbury canoniz'd St. George's day 93. The occasion of that Constitution ibid. Chindavintus King of the western Goths his Law concerning Wills 130. Cingulum quo sensu accipiendum 185. Cinque-Ports priviledges granted to them by King Edward the Confessour c. 26. Clacklose-Hundred 139. Clergy-men forbidden to use hunting 109 112 113. seq When they took upon them to prove Wills 129. Prohibited by Justinian to meddle with those matters ibid. Cley harbour 151. De Clifford Rob. Marshal of England 167. K. Canute's Charter of donation to the Thane Orc. 20. Coin of England in Q. Elisabeth's time 203 c. Colloquia 65. Comites who and why so call'd 3. Commendati 35. Congham 145. Conradus Salicus made a Constitution touching Feuds 4 5. Consecration a strange one of Eadmer a Monk of Canterbury 119. Consilium regni 60. Controversies among the ancient Britains by whom judg'd 74. Conveyance of lands how made by the Saxons 8. Cosshering what 60. Cossey 157. Counties in England 5. County-Courts how often kept 54. Were proclaim'd a sennight beforehand ib. Earl's County and Bishop's Diocess had but one limit 130 131. Ecclesiastical and Secular causes there decided 131. Court-Baron 4. It s Original 51. Court-Leet 51. Sometimes granted to the Lords of Mannours ibid. Court-Christian or Ecclesiastical when it sprung up 131 132. High Courts of Justice why they sit not in the Afternoons 89 90. Why they sit not all some days 90 91. Why they sit on the Rogation days ibid. Why on some Festivals and not on others 91 The Admiralty-Court why always open 94. Chancery-Court said to be always open ib. Cowshil 153. Creak 149. Cromer 152. Crostwick 153. Crowner's Office not before the Conquest 27. D Dane-blood 149. Dane-law 45. Danes not capable of devising lands by will 22 David I. King of Scotland and Earl of Huntingdon 11 131. Dean his Office and Functions 50. The priviledges of a Bishop's Dean ibid. Deerham West 140. Defensor Plebis 129. Degradatio Militis 185. Deira a Province 13. Demains or Demesne what 12. Ancient Demesnes had not any lands by Knight-service 44 57. D'Evreux Robert Earl of Essex Viscount Bourchier c. 171. Sent into Spain with an army ibid. Storm'd Cadiz ibid. Created Marshal of England ibid. Made Lord Deputy of Ireland ibid. When beheaded ibid. Dies juridici 72 73. Dies feriales 72. Dies pacis Ecclesiae ibid. 79. 82. Dies pacis Regis ibib 82. Dies novem Lectionum 91. Dies feriati repentini 93. Dower why judg'd to belong to the Ecclesiastical Court 132. Downham 140. Druides who 74. The sole Judges of controversies among the old Britains 74. Suppos'd to have us'd the Greek tongue 103 Had no knowledge of the Latin ibid. Dudley John Duke of Northumberland and Earl Marshal of England 170. E Eadmere a Monk of Canterbury made Arch-bishop of St. Andrews in Scotland 119. King Eadwigus's Charter of Thane-lands granted to Aelswine 19. Earl Marshals of England 169 170 171. Earl of a County see Alderman Earldoms not hereditary in ancient times 13. Earldoms in France ibid. 14. Earls among the Saxons 13 14. Earl no title of dignity anciently 13. Their Office depended on the King's pleasure ibid. An Earls Heriot 31. Easter-Term how limited anciently 83. Easter-week when exempted from Law business 76. Ebsam in
Richard Tribunus Regis or Marshal to King Henry II. 166. Hundradors 51. Hundreds their original 50. Hundred Courts 51. Hunting forbidden to Clergy-men 109 112 113 114 115. Hydes what 17. When disus'd 4â— I Ibreneys Rad. de 190. Iceni 135. Eorum nomina derivatio ibid. Icenia 135. Ejusdem termini ibid. Coelum solum 13â— Ina King of the West Saxons adjusted the quantity of Rent for every Plough-land 15. By whose advice he made his Laws 61. Made a strict Law against working on Sundays 57. Ingolsthorp 146. Inland what 12. Intwood 157. K. John's Magna Charta 63. John Marshal to King Henry I. 165. Irregularity of Clergy-men wherein it consists 109 112. I se fluvius unde dictus 135. Ejusdem aestus 139. Islepe Sim Arch-bishop of Canterbury 90. Jury taken out of several Hundreds in a County 53. Jurours prohibited to have meat c. till agreed of their Verdict 89. Jus Gentium 2. Justices of Evre when instituted 27. Justinian the Emperor when he flourish'd 129. He prohibited Clergy-men to take cognizance of Wills ibid. Justitium what 72. K Keninghall 158. Kent the custom of Gavelkind in that County 43. Kettringham 15â— The King the fountain of all Feuds and Tenures 1â— The King to have his Tenants lands till the heir has done homage 3â— The King universal Lord of his whole Territories 37. Anciently granted Churches to Lay-men 115 Knight what among the Saxons 51 58. Why there are but two Knights of the Shire for a County 64. Knight's-fees 3 4 51 58. When introduc'd 45. The number of them ibid. The value of a Knights-fee ibid. Knight-service 2 7. Kymberley 158. S Sacha Soca what in the Saxon tongue 51. Saliques bring the German feodal Rights into France 5. Sall in Norfolk 151. Sandringham 146. Sanhadrim when and where the Judges of it sate 75. Satrapies among the Saxons 50. Saxons the first planters of the German Rites in Great Britain 5. Their Charters translated 7. The manner of making their conveyances 8 Distinction of persons among them 11. How many degrees of Honour they had 16. How they held their lands 40. What oblig'd 'em to so many kinds of services ibid. Saxons very much given to drunkenness 89. When they took possession of England 100. They swept away the Roman Laws there 101 Yet took somewhat from them 102. Why their Laws were not at first put in writing ibid. When they had written Laws ibid. The use of wills unknown to the ancient Saxons 127. Our Saxons observ'd the Civil Law in their wills 128. Scutagium 36 37. Sedgeford 146. Segrave Nicholas Marshal of England 167. Seignory wherein it consists 2. Services how many sorts of 'em upon lands 17. Personal services 40. Praedial ibid. Alodial ibid. Beneficiary ibid. Colonical ibid. Servitia militaria what 46. The difference between them and Servitutes militares ibid Seymour Edward Duke of Somerset Nephew of King Edw. VI. 169. Made Lord Treasurer and Earl Marshal of England ibid. Shardlow Joh Justice of Oyer had a licence to hear causes on a Festival 95 96. Sharnburn 146. History of the Family 189 c. Shelton 156. Shouldham 142. Shyre gemot what 53. Signioral authority what 6â— Snetsham 146 189 190 c. Socage 3 7 33 43. Socmen 1â— 15 57. Sprowston 153. Stanchow 146 19â— Star chamber Court 94 95. Stigand Arch-bishop of Canterbury depos'd 119. Stock-Chappel 146. Stow-Bardolfe 140. Strangbow Gilb Earl of Pembroke and Marshal of the King's Palace 165. Suiters of the Hundred 51. When and by whom call'd at this day ibid. Summons the manner of it in the Empire 36. Sunday how exempted from Law Suits 76. Sustenance what 59. Swasham 141. Swainmote-Courts 85. Syndici who 63 64. Synod of Eanham when held 78. T Talbot George Earl of Shrewsbury 171. Executed the Office of Lord High Steward of England ibid. Tallagium 60. Tasburg 156. Tassilo Duke of Bavaria did homage to King Pipin 34. Tenant lands of how many sorts 4. Tenants by Knight-service 4. Tenant in capite 10. Tenant in menalty ibid. Tenant Paraval ibid. Tenant's land or the Tenancy 12. Tenants what they were in ancient time 51. Tenants in Socage 57. Tenants forc'd to pay a fine upon the marriage of a Daughter 60. To furnish their Lords with provisions ibid. To present them with gratuities ibid. Tenure in capite 2. By Knight-service 4 7. The Original of Tenures 4. Tenure in Socage 4 7. Tenures for Life ibid. What tenures were in use among the Saxons 7. When first us'd ibid. No tenures in capite among the Saxons 10. Tenure in capite of two sorts ibid. The fruits of feodal tenures 24. The name of tenures not us'd by the Saxons 40. Terminus what it signifies 71. When the word became frequent ibid. Terms their definition and etymology 71. Several acceptations of the word 70. Full term and Puisne term ibid. The Original of Terms 73 77. Two Terms among the Welch 74. The Terms laid out according to the ancient Laws 82. The ancient bounds of Hilary-Term 82 83. Of Easter-Term 83. Of Trinity-Term 84 85. Of Michaelmass-Term 85 86. How Trinity Term was alter'd 87. Michaelmass-Term how abbreviated 88. Why the Terms are sometime extended into the Vacation 95. Terra Regis 57. Terrae testamentales 12. Terrington 138. Tertium denarium 14. Testaments and last wills not in use among the ancient Hebrews 127. Not found in Scripture before Christ's time ibid. Expresly mention'd by St. Paul ibid. Not us'd by the Saxons or Normans ibid. The custom of making wills from whom taken up ibid. How many witnesses to a will requir'd by the Civil Law 128. Thane or Theoden who 10 11. Their several kinds 16. Not properly a title of Dignity ibid. The Etymology of their name ibid. The quality of their Persons ibid. The nature of their Land 17. The word Thane has no relation to war 21. A Thane's Heriot 31. Thane-lands not subject to feodal service 18. Charters of Thane-lands granted by Saxon Kings 19 20. The occasion of granting them 21. Thane-lands alienated ibid. Devised by will 22. Granted to women ibid. No service upon 'em but what was express'd ibid. Dispos d of at the pleasure of the owner 23. Charged with a Rent ibid. Might be restrain'd from alienation ibid. Thane-lands and Reveland what 38. Thani majores minores 16. Thani Regis ibid. Theinge 50. His jurisdiction ibid. Theowes and Esnes who 11. Thetford 158. Thokus Dominus de Sharnburn 189. Thola the widow of Ore had a grant of certain lands of K. Edw. the Confessour 20. Obtain'd a Licence to devise her Lands and Goods 34. Thrimsa what 15. Thrithingreves or Leidgerevâ—s their Office and Authority 52. What causes were usually brought before ' em ibid. Tribunus militum rei militaris aut exercitus 165. Tribute 59. Trimarcesia what 3. Trinity-term its ancient bounds 84 85. How it was alter'd and shortned 87. Trinodis necessitas 17 43. Trithings or Lathes 50. Why so call'd 52. Turfs why so call'd 139 140. Tydd
therefore and truly is it said by the ever honoured Justice Littleton that Feodum idem est quod haereditas and the captious criticism of Sir Thomas Smith Dr. of the Civil Law in denying it is to his own reproach for his great Master Cujacius as before appeareth supporteth Littleton and his fellow Civilians do tell him quod in feudis particularis localis consuetudo attendenda est And Littleton received it as used in this signification from the eldest writers of our Law Of the like indiscretion is that of Dr. Cowell who carpeth at this ancient phrase used in the formulis of our pleading where it is ordinarily said Rex seisitus fuit in Dominico suo ut de feodo as tho de feodo was there to be understood according to the Court of Milan for praedium militare superiori Domino servitiis obnoxium not by the laws of England pro directo dominio vel haereditate pura absoluta To conclude therefore It appeareth by this passage of Justice Littleton's joyned to that we have formerly delivered that our Law took no notice of Feuds till they were become hereditary with us which being since the Conquest as we have already shewed and shall prove abundantly hereafter overthroweth all the arguments in the Report produced for proving our Feodal rites of Tenure Wardship Marriage Relief c. to have been in use among the Saxons for till they were hereditary these appendances could not belong to them It is also very improbable that Feuds were made hereditary here in England before other Countries or that the more civil Nations of Europe should take example herein from our rude if not illiterate Saxons CHAP. III. That none of our Feodal Words nor Words of Tenure are found in any Law or ancient Charter of the Saxons IT appeareth by that which hath been said that our modern kind of Feuds could not be in use among our English Saxons And it will now be a question whether any of our modern Tenures or which of them were then in use or not The Report saith It is most manifest that Capite-Tenures Tenures by Knight-service Tenure in Socage Frank-Almoign c. were frequent in the time of the Saxons I desire that without offence I may examine this that is so manifest and so frequent I confess there be many specious shews of Knight-service and Socage among our Saxon Ancestors but whether by way of Tenure Contract or De more Gentium must be well examined For the Romans and other Nations had formerly as great command over their followers and such as dwelt upon their lands as our Saxons had yet was it without any rule or speech of Tenure The word Tenura is neither known nor found in any Latin Author of antiquity nor any conjugate thereof as tenentes tenementa tenere or tenendum in a feodal sense The first place where I meet with tenere in that manner is amongst the Saliques and Germans in the Constitution before mentioned of Conradus the Emperour about the year 915 when Beneficia which we now call Feuds were first continued to some of the sons and grand-children of the male line of them that then enjoyed them But I find not one of those words or any consignificant or equivalent to them in all our Saxon-laws The word Feodum Feud or Fee it self is never mentioned in them nor is there any sound of Tenure in Capite Tenure by Knight-service Tenure in Socage Frank-Almoign c. either in our Saxon laws or in the laws of any other Nation that I can find till the time that Feuds began to be perpetual or hereditary as before is mentioned It is true that in some Latin Charters of the Saxon time we now and then find the words Tenere tenementum and tenendum and in a Charter of Beorredus King of the Mercians dated Anno 868. the words de eodem seodo as tho' Lordships at that time had been distributed into Feuds which being reported by Ingulfus a Saxon giveth great probability that Feuds were then in use But it is to be noted that these Charters are as I said in Latin and not in Saxon and therefore not likely to be the very originals but translations of them made after the Conquest for the instruction of the Normans either by Ingulf himself or some other expert in the Norman language laws and customs Who applying himself to the understanding of the Normans used Norman words and such interpretation as they were best acquainted with tho' differing from the propriety of the Saxon tongue and so perhaps translated de eodem fâ—odo for de eodem territorio or patrimonio and tenentes tenementa and tenendum for possidentes possessiones and possidendum Not unlike our translators of the holy Scriptures who tell us of the Arms of Families Chancellors Sheriffs Recorders Townclerks Doctors of Law Homage done to Solomon and of the arraignment of our blessed Saviour as tho' the Jewish and Asiatick Nations had in those days of old their College of Heralds the same Magistrates Officers Degrees in School Customs of Law Pleas of the Crown and form of Government which we in England have at this day By such allusions I suppose or illusions rather came our later Feodal words into ancient Latin Charters I desire to see but one Charter in the Saxon tongue before the Conquest wherein any Feodal Word is apparently expressed A Saxon Chronicle telleth us that King Alfred in the year 896. gave London to Ethelred an Earl or Alderman that married his daughter Ethelfled to healdo that is ad tenendum which some understand Feodally as to hold it of him but Wigorniensis reports the matter plainly ad servandum that is to keep and defend it So among the customs of Kent the word healder i. e. holder is used for a Tenant in the Saxon distich there cited But it is to be noted that those customs were collected long after the Conquest and therefore written in the Norman tongue not in the Saxon and that the distich it self is not of the ancient Saxon but of a puisne dialect used vulgarly since the Conquest But because the Charter of Beorredus produced by my self against my self is more material for proof of Feuds among the Saxons than all that is alledged to that purpose in the Report First in respect of the Antiquity thereof then for that it nameth the word feodo expresly and thirdly for that it declareth certain lands to be de eodem feodo as if there were many other Feods then in use Give me leave I beseech you to examine this Charter yet more largely and particularly It is therefore to be understood that the elder Saxons made their ordinary conveyance of Lands c. without deed or writing by delivery of a Turff or Spear a Staff an Arrow or some other symboll in token thereof Yea their very Laws like those of the Lacedaemonians called Rhetra were unwritten till Ethelbert their first
text of customs And to clear the doubt in the elder Edition publish'd by Tottill 12. June 1556. no such thing is mention'd but if it were there are such other differences in their copies as both their authorities may be question'd and I in the mean time well delivered from this objection Let us see what followeth Fourthly For the antiquity of Wardships in England and Scotland See also says the Report Hector Boet. lib. 2. Buchanan rerum Scot. lib. 6. and the laws of Malcome II. which prove the antiquity of Wardships in Scotland and in England before the Conquest For in those times it is probable the laws of both Nations did not much differ as for the times after it appears they did not by comparing their Regiam Majestatem with our Glanvil Neither is the bare conjecture of Sir Henry Spelman sufficient to take away the force of those laws Vid. Spelman's Glossary verbo Feudum Upon all this saith the Report they the Justices of Ireland did conclude and proceed to sentence With the sentence as a sacred thing I will not meddle But as touching that part of this argument which In nostros fabricata est machina muros I 'm tyed either to answer or to submit For Hector Boethius therefore I confess the place to be truly alledg'd and that hitherto hath seldom happened but for the credit of that Author I wish Leland were alive to deliver the censure he hath left upon him with his own mouth I forbear it True it is he relateth that Malcolm II. gave all his lands well nigh unto his Nobility in reward of their service and that they in thankfulness to support his dignity regranted unto him Vardam Desponsationem releviam al. relevatam Wardship and Marriage of their Heirs within age and Relief of those of full age The Paragraph there is long but to the effect we spoke of It is also true that Buchanan doth report the like and since him Cameraris and a little before them all Johannes Major but all their harping is from the sound of one string which in the Report is not left unstrain'd i. e. the laws of Malcolme before mention'd where it is said that ad montem placiti in Villa de Scona omnes Barones concesserunt sibi Wardam Releviam de Haerede cujuscunque Baronis defuncti ad sustentationem Domini Regis Which because they concern a noble Kindom and have been receiv'd as authentical by an ancient Parliament I will not presume to contradict it But I humbly offer to the consideration of the Learned of that Kingdom and to those of ours and theirs that are conversant in Antiquities these particulars following First It being agreed which the Scots affirm that Malcolm II. began his reign in the year 1004. i. e. above 60. years before the Normans Conquer'd England how it cometh to pass that Malcolm useth so many Norman words in his Scottish Laws and whether those words be found in any other monument there before for in England it was not so Secondly Whether their Kings then had not only a Seal but magnum sigillum in the custody of the Chancellor and set-fees appointed for the use of it for in England it was not so tho Edward the Confessour had a Seal after Malcolm's time Thirdly Whether they had brevia clausa in cera and other ordinary instruments seal'd cum magno sigillo and fees appointed for it for in England it was not so Fourthly Whether they had solemn presentations to Churches and Hospitals under Seals in that manner for this was long before the Council of Lateran Fifthly Whether they had then the names of Barons Seneschallus Constabularius Mareschallus not in use in England in the time of the Confessour as appeareth for the two latter by the Appendix to the Confessours laws and for their Seneschallus called their Steward Buchanan says he was brought in by Malcolm III. into Scotland Sixthly Whether the Norman Officers of Justiciarius Vicecomes Coronator Ballivus c. were then in use by any other proof than by or from these laws sic de caeteris Many other things I pretermit and take no exception to the frequent mention of Pounds and Shillings tho' I know they were scarce with them in Scotland as not abundant then in England but paid in Truck and Cattel But I admit that which the Report saith that in those times it is probable the laws of both Nations did not much differ As for the times after it appeareth they did not by comparing their Regiam Majestatem with our Glanvil They run much I confess paribus vestigiis and oftentimes totidem verbis iisdem paragraphis Whether of them leads or follows the other I dare not define and am loath to dispute The Preface to the Regia Majestas sheweth it to be written at the command of King David whom Skeneus in his Annotations calleth the first and saith he began to reign Anno 1124. i. e. 24. or 25. of Hen. I. And 't is certain that our Glanvil was not written till the time of Hen. II. who began not to reign till 1154. so that if this be true it must needs follow that we took a great part of the modell of our laws or at least the expression of them from the Scots which our Ancestors never yet acknowledg'd It may perhaps fall out upon better examination that David I. may be mistaken for David II. But for the part of Malcolm II's laws which speak of Wardship Marriage and Relief in Scotland at that time to have risen from their own Nobility Buchanan himself recedeth from that opinion and concludes Hunâ— morem ab Anglis Danis potius acceptum credo quod in tota Anglia parte Normanniae adhuc perseveret And Demster himself their greatest Antiquary ingeniously consesseth that there were no Barons in Scotland till Malcolm III. created them And he might well take his precedent from the Conquerour for he liv'd all the time of the Conquerour and about seven years after so that if there were no Barons in Scotland in the time of Malcolm II. as Demster affirmeth or the precedent taken out of England for Wardship as Buchanan believeth then could not this law be made in Malcolm II's time but seemeth rather by both their opinions to be ascrib'd to Malcolm III. and that the error hath risen as easily it may in writing II. for III. But in the mean time all this makes no proof against me CHAP. XV. No Marriage of Wards AS for Marriage it is here and in some other places mention'd by the Report but not a word any where to prove that it belonged to the Lord in the Saxon time I will help them with what I meet in the old MS. Book of Ramsey Sect. 120. where it is said that one Edwine son of Othulf gave five hides of land to Archbishop Odo Pro eo quod Regem Edredum inflexerat ut ei liceret