this State of the Empire and of absolute Sovereign Princes (x) Leges jubere universis singulis civilâ—s dare De Repub lib. 1. c. 10. lib. 3. Bodin saith it is the first and principal part of Majesty to command Laws and impose them on all and singular the Subjects and he saith That in the Emperors time the name of the Senate was inscribed only to testify such Laws were made and to render them more acceptable to the People by the opinion they would then have that they were made with Council and Prudence So (y) Polit. c. 11. Law-making the Prerogative of Sovereign Princes Anisaeus ranks it among the first of the Jura Majestatis to make Laws for that the Government saith he is for the most part by Laws therefore they should be in the hand of the Sovereign for that they have no Power but as they are inforced by his Authority who possesseth the Plenitude of Empire I shall only note a few things of the absoluteness of the Roman Emperors in point of Law-making or abrogating and so pass to the considerations of our English Monarchy referring the larger and more explicit treating of it to the Chapters of Parliaments In the Capitol now Lateran Palace is extant a Table of (z) Gruteri Inscript p. 142. A Fragment of the Lex Regia yet extant Brass where is to be seen a fragment of the Lex Regia renewed as to Vespasian confirming many things of Sovereign and sole Authority as descending upon him from his Predecessors and enacting That what he had done decreed or commanded before his Ratification should be held and taken for as good Law as if the People it self had done decreed or commanded it So that tho' he might make use of the Senate or Peoples Ratification yet his Right was as strong before So (a) Tit. De Legibus lib. 1. Constantine challengeth to himself alone Authority to judge betwixt Law and Equity and so in point of Repeal of Laws (b) Non ab aliis sed a sese leges abrogatas suisse Lib. 3. Theodosius and Valentinian say That the Laws were to be abrogated by no other but themselves It is not to be doubted but that great and vast Empires require for their better Government a more absolute Power in the Sovereign to make Laws suitable to Emergencies for the Preservation of the whole So the Ottoman Empire and those of China Persia and the Mogul could not well be conserved entire without it Yet in these there are established Laws agreeable to the Laws of Nature and of Nations whereby the Rights of meum and tuum to Strangers are adjusted and the Subjects though they have no Property like the Europaeans yet are kept in Order and under Protection of the Laws and their Absoluteness consists principally in the ordering the Execution of any Subject without Juridical Process in placing and displacing Governours or depriving Cities Provinces and Kingdoms of Priviledges I have enlarged upon this Head to show how happy we are in England The happy State of England in the disposing of the Legislative Power that though the Force and Vigor of all our Laws flow from our Sovereigns Paternal Care â—â—ace and Bounty yet in the Point of making and abrogating Laws not only Consultation is had with so venerable a Body as the two Houses of Parliament are but nothing is done by the Sovereign without their own Preparation of Bills for his Royal Assent A wise and wealthy part of which are chosen by our selves and by the Kings Permission impowered in that particular to act for us in deliberating upon and fashioning such Bills as they petition the Sovereign to grant So that what the Judicious (c) Preface to the Reader Comp. History Dr. Brady after many other learned Men asserts is most true That by time and the Concessions of our Kings the Subjects of this Government have and may enjoy all Freedom and Happiness that sober rational Men can desire and such as is no where to be found but in this Island and the Dominions to it belonging nor can any Man that loves his Prince or Country wish for other than the present Constitution By the whole series of great Councils in the Saxon times until 49 Hen. 3. and the Parliaments succeeding I shall make it clear That the Royal Assent is that which forms the Preparatory Bills presented by both Houses into Laws and that in ancienter times the Laws were made by the Kings sole Grant by way of Charter I shall here only lay down some Preliminaries to shew in general what the ancient Usage was referring Particulars to the following Chapters First it appears That there were no certain (d) Sheringham's Supremacy p. 51. Anciently Kings called whom they pleased to advise them in making Laws Persons designed by Law whose Concurrence was required to constitute a great Council but the Kings used the Advice only of those whom they pleased to call unto themselves who were always such as they thought most able to counsel and direct them in the matters that were to be consulted of and whose assent was most likely to add most Credit and Estimation to the Laws that were to be divulged So we find in (e) Chron. Sax. Anno 670. fol. 516. And tha haefde getheal mid his witum freondam mid heora Teymenysse fultum gethafunge Christes geleassan onfeng Bed Eccl. Hist lib. 3. c. 22. Bede that Segebert or Sigbercht who was King of the East Saxons in the time of Oswi King of Northumberland who perswaded him to become a Christian held a Council with his Wites i.e. Nobles and Wisemen and his Friends and by their Advice Aid and Consent received the Christian Faith We find that Offa King of the Mercians made Laws without the Assent of his Great Council for he being at Rome (f) Mat. Paris vita Offae p. 171. Hoc autem per totam suam ditionem teneri in perpetuum constituit golng into the School of the English which was there out of his Royal Munificence He gave to the support of the People of his Kingdom that should come thither a Penny to be paid yearly for ever out of every Family by all whose Goods in the Fields exceeded the value of Thirty Pence and this he made a perpetual Constitution throughout all his Dominions excepting the Lands conferred upon the Monastery of St. Albans This Imposition and Law continued a long while in force though we find it not confirmed by any great Council in his own time or his Successors only in the Laws of King Edgar and King Edward it is enjoyned to be payed as the Kings Alms which implies it was the Kings Gift solely not by consent of a great Council So his Son (g) Matt. Paris Auct additam fol. 239 240. Ecgfrid grants Thyreseld to St. Albans with the Consent and Testimony of his Magnates which imports it to be granted by Consent of a Great
a se primo essent ordinata Eadmer tells us That when the Archbishop of Canterbury presided in a general Council of the Bishops the King permitted him not to appoint or forbid any thing but such things as were agreeable to his will and by himself were first ordained Also he saith in all his Dominions he would allow no Bishop of Rome to be accounted Apostolic but whom he commanded to be received nor any to receive his Bulls or Breves unless they were first shown to him I have in the beginning of this Chapter spoken something of the Mutations that William the Conqueror made in the Constitution of the Government of England concerning which I shall only note That the Conqueror took all the care that a great Commander and Conqueror of a great Nation could do for securing his Conqests (p) Pictav fol. 197. C. Ingulph 512. a lin 7. What the Conqueror did to secure his Conquest by building Fortresses and Castles within the City of London and placing Norman Garrisons and French Governours or Castellanes in the Castles in the Country and giving them great Estates and carrying the chief of the English Nobility with him as Hostages into Normandy and imposed his Laws as Pictavensis relates (q) Id. fol. 2â—6 a. 207 c. 2â—8 a. b. and though he who was Chaplain to the Conqueror speak of the Conqueror's smooth behaviour to the English ordering things as he saith prudently justly and mildly some to the Profit and Dignity of the City some to the advantage of the whole Nation and other some to the benefit of the Churches of the Land and whatever Laws he dictated he established with excellent reason and adds That no French-man (r) Nulli tamen Gallo datum est quod Anglo â—uiquam injuste fuecit ablatum Idem fol. 208. c. had any thing given him which was unjustly taken from any Englishman which last Ordericus Vitalis omits though in other things he follows Pictavensis exactly yet Pictavensis writing but to the Fourth of his Reign Anno 1070. as is noted by Ordericus we must look upon them as incompetent Witnesses of the severity the Conqueror after used when he had secured his Conquest So that what is urged by some of the Conqueror's lenity and his little change of Laws and Government is to be understood of those times while he was unsafe in his Conquests and doth not so interfere as they would make the World believe How he comported himself after he had secured his Conquest with the assertion of those who from credible Authors speak of his treating the English as a Conquered People For Pictavensis (s) Jure Belli possedit fol. 206. a. saith that he possessed the Country by the rights of War Ordericus (t) Adjutoribus suis inclytas Angliae Regiones distribuit ex insimis Normannorum Clientibus Tribunos Centuriones ditissimos erexit Orderic Vit. 251. Vitalis saith That having circumvented the two great Earls of Mercia and slain Edwin and imprisoned Morcas then he began to shew himself and gave the best Counties of England to his Assistants and of the lowest of the Norman Clients or very mean People he made very rich Colonels and Captains as he particularizes there and in another (u) Fundos eorum cum omnibus divitiis obtinâ—imus Id. fol. 853. place That having overthrown by Force and Arms the English Saxons they obtained their Lands and all their Riches Malmsbury (w) Malmsb. fol. 52. a. num 40. Vix aliquis Princeps de progenie Anglorum esset in Anglia sed omnes ad servitutem moerorem redacti essent ita ut Anglieum vocari opprobrjum saith That there was no Englishman Duke or Bishop or Abbat but Strangers do gnaw the Riches and very Bowels of England So (x) Hen. Hunt fol. 210 b. num 10. About the continuing the English Saxons but changing their Tenures Services c. Hen. of Huntingdon saith there was scarce any Prince of the Progenie of the English but all are reduced to Servitude and Sorrow so that it is a disgrace to be called an Englishman and Gervase of Canterbury saith That he used both Ecclesiastick and Secular Rights or Laws as he pleased tam Ecclesiastica Jura quam secularia sibi usurpavit As to King William's displacing of the Saxons I find in the Transcript of Doomsday-Book that I have for Yorkshire that very many enjoyed the same Lands they did in Edward the Confessors time but I remember no where that I do not find them hold of some Norman Lords which is agreeable to what Dr. Brady writes but I refer the Discourse of those to my Antiquities of Yorkshire if God give me life and ability to publish them As to the Conqueror's changing the holding of Lands here to the (y) Spelman Gloss Feodam Feudal Tenure used in Normandy begun by the Germans Longobards Francks and others and of which something seems to be hinted in the English Saxon Laws all Authors do conclude that the Conqueror brought the exacter use at least of them into England and divided the whole Land into several Knights-fees whereof there are reckoned 700 Tenants in Capite besides Bishops Abbats Priors and great Church-men and the Laws of King Edward that the Conqueror permitted to be used were either most of them Penal Laws from which he got profit or such as are properly his own and were efficacious for the preservation of the Peace and establishment of Government as the 52 55 56 58 59 64. whereof the 55 58 and 59. are Feudal How William the Conqueror brought in his other Norman Laws Dr. Brady in his Preface to the Norman Story hath at large discoursed so that in Justice I must refer the Curious Reader to his elaborate work and to Mr. Selden in his Second Book of his Janus Anglorum Of the Great Councils in William the Second's time IN the Reign of William Rufus we find few Great Councils So that Anselm Archbishop of Canterbury complains (a) Eadmer Hist Nov. lib. 1. fol. 24. lin 8. to him when he was preparing to pass into Normandy that since he was King there had been no General Council of the Bishops nor of several years before so that Christianity was much decayed The first great Council I have met with is that of Winchester (b) Idem fol. 20. num 30. Anno D. 1093. 5 W. Rusi The Contest betwixt William the Second and Anselm This Council is only thus expressed Rex adunato Wintoniae conventu Nobilium without specifying either Ecclesiasticks or Laicks In this Council the King declared Anselm Archbishop and he did Homage to him (c) Idem p. 26. num 10.6 Gul. 2. This Anselm sought leave of the King that he might go to Rome to receive the Pall from Pope Vrban whom the King did not own for Pope but Clement This and some other Matters occasioned sharp words and unkindness from the King to Anselm the King absolutely denying
de Sabaudia J. Filius Galfridi Jacobus de Audel Petrus de Monteforti vice totius Communitatis praesentibus Literis sigilla nostra apposuimus in Testimonium praedictorum So that it is plain it was not Peter de Montefort that signed vice Communitatis but they all did it and he was a great Baron himself the Head of whose Barony was Beldesent Castle in Warwickshire I think it not amiss here to offer my Opinion concerning this Question and the great Controversie betwixt Dr. Concerning the Commons first summoning to Parliament Brady and Mr. Petyt and those that are so earnest to find the Commons summoned to Parliament before the 49 H. 3. before King John granted his Charter wherein he grants that he will cause to be summoned the Archbishops Bishops Abbats Earls and greater Barons of his Kingdom singly by his Letters and besides (i) Et Praeterea faciemus submoneri in generali per Viâ—ecomites Ballivos nostros omnes alios qui in Capite tenent de nobis Matt. Paris fol. 216. Edit ult num 20. will cause to be summoned in general by his Sheriffs The Tenents in Capite in stead of the Representative Commons as now and Bayliffs all others which hold of him in Capite at a certain day there is no doubt but the Tenents in Capite such of them at least as were eminent for Parts or as the King pleased were summoned to the great Councils and it being in that Charter said that the cause of the Meeting should be expressed in the Summons and that Forty days warning should be given and in the same Charter that the City of London should have all its ancient Liberties and free Customs and that all other Cities Burghs and Villa's which was of the same import as a Free Burrough as we find in Pontefract which is always stiled Villa Some summoned from Cities and Burroughs before King John's time but not as our Citizens and Burgesses now by Representation and the Inhabitants Burgenses who held a certain Land called Burgage Land and the Barons of the Cinque Ports and all the Ports should have all their Liberties and their Free Customs ad habendum commune concilium Regni de Auxiliis c. that is as I suppose to have some of their Members at the great Councils where Aids were to be granted to the King other ways than in three cases before excepted that is to redeem the Kings body to make his Eldest Son a Knight and to marry once his Eldest Daughter excepting which three Particulars reserved before in his Charter he had granted that no Scutage nor Aid should be laid on his Kingdom unless by the Common Council of his Kingdom From whence I think may be inferred that such Cities Burroughs and Villa's which held in Capite or the Lord that was principal owner of them by his Praepositus Ballivus or some that held immediately under him and so some for the Dominicae Civitates Burgi Regis might be summoned with the lesser Barons or the other Tenents inc Capite But this doth not prove them to come by way of Representatives nor that they had any more Power than the Knights Citizens and Burgesses had in after-times which as I have made it apparent by the several expressions in the Summons was only to hear and assent to what the King and Magnates ordained Since there are now extant no Summons in King John's time or before the 49 H. 3. except some few that are about the Tenents in Capite aiding the King in his Wars the subsequent Practices are the best Expounders of ancient Usages Upon the whole I do judge that before King John's Charter there were many of the Tenents in Capite summoned to the great Councils but so as the King had his liberty to summon whom he pleased and that some from Cities Burghs Villa's and other Ports did come to the great Council but still at the Kings pleasure and that in King John's time the body of the Kingdom siding with the Lords that so often rebelled against him the Lords thinking to make their Party stronger got the Clause for other Tenents in Capite to be summoned by general Summons After King John's Charter the Tenents in Capite so numerous as might be reputed an House of Commons Now whatever number were convened before King John's Charter this general Summons must greatly encrease the House of Commons as I may call it and there needs no such strife about the want of Freemen in these Councils for after this Charter all who were properly Freemen were capable the other were generally Tenents to them and Homagers which was a Tenure that though it might free their Persons yet their Lands were obnoxious to forfeiture upon every breach of Homage and their Lords had the power of taxing them so that in some sense they were their Tenents Representatives and as long as they were Freeholders themselves and were a more numerous body if they all appeared as for any thing I see they might do if not hindred by Impotence Nonage or the Kings service they far exceeded the number of Representatives in the Reigns of King H. 3. E. 1. and E. 2. So that it amounts to the same thing as to the general Freedom of the Nation when all these were Members of the Great Councils Who properly Freeholders in Kâ— John's time whether the common Freeholder were represented or not as now which Dr. Brady hath so nervously confuted every where in his Introduction that they were not that I think the Freedom Mr. Petyt Mr. Pen and others make so great a coyl about no ways impaired by Dr. Brady who like a judicious Person would have us use propriety of Speech and rather be thankful for the Freedom we now enjoy and our Ancestors have from time to time obtained by the grant of Kings than to make such Claims to native Freedoms and Liberties as Mr. Pen would have it that our Ancestors contended for as if their Ancestors had enjoyed them before we had any Kings and stipulated with their Kings for them before they admitted them to Soveraignty which no considering person that will impartially read ancient History either of our Country or others can find any certain footsteps of To return now to the business which the foregoing observation gives some light to I conceive as the Thegns the Kings Prepositi and Reeves As the Thegns in the Saxon-times so the Praepositi Reeves c. of Burroughs after by reason of their Imployments about the Kings Demesn Lands governing of Burroughs Stewards of Hundreds Wapentakes and men employed in other civil Affairs of the Kingdom did meet in the Saxon Councils so from Cities and Burroughs where great Lords had Fees as most if not all of them may be easily proved to have been held immediately of the King or of some of the very great Barons there might come before King John's time some Members to the great
Kindred and drives her through the Streets lashing or beating her as she goes along This as Juvenal saith was Ipsis Marti Venerique timendum So Antinous in Homer threatens Irus with the chopping off his Nose Ears and Privities and Vlysses inflicts that very punishment upon his Goat-herd Melanthius for his Pimping So in Canutus his Law the Wife who took other Passengers aboard her than her Husband is doomed she should have her Nose and Ears cut off Jâ—â—us Anglorum The curious may see more in Selden Tacitus observes another Law Hâ—â—redes successoresque sui cuique liberi nullum testamentum Si liberi non sunt pâ—â—ximus gradus in possâ—ssâ—oâ—e sratres patrui avunculi Idem that every ones Children were their Heirs and Successors and there was no Will to be If there be no Children then the next of kin shall inherit Brethren or Unkles by the Fathers or Mothers This seems to point out Gavil-kind otherwise there had been need of a Testament to dispose of something for younger Children So Selden observes that till our Grandfathers time it was not lawful to dispose of Land-Estates by Will unless it were in some Burroughs that had such priviledges but this hindred not but they might dispose by Deeds Another Law he mentions Suscipere inimicitias seu patris seu propiâ—qui quam amicitias necesse est Idem Nec implacabiles durant luitur enim etiam homicidium certo Armâ—ntorum ac pecorum numero recipitque satisfactionem universa domâ—s Idem which shews the use of those are called Deadly Feuds in the North was that to undertake the enmities rather than the friendships whether of ones Father or Kinsman is more necessary Yet he saith those do not hold on never to be appeased for even Murther is expiated by a certain number of Cattle and the whole Family of the murdered Person receives satisfaction So we find in our English Saxon Laws Murthers were formerly bought off with Head-money which was called Wâ—â—gild though one had killed a Noble-man yea a King himself which as I remember was valued at 60000 Thrimsas or Groats and so a Prince 30000 and others Proportionable Another Law we find thus The Lord imposeth upon his Tenant a certain quantity of Corn or Cattle or Clothes Frumenti modum Deminus aut pecoris aut vestis colâ—no injungit Idem Here we certainly find the usage of Country Farmholders In â—â—imitivo Regni sâ—â—tu pâ—st conquis â—â—nem 〈…〉 〈…〉 argenti 〈◊〉 sed sola 〈◊〉 solvebantur Dialog Scaccar So yet in Scotland a Gentleman of Quality or Lords Estate is not computed by Annual Rent but by so many Bolls of Victual So we find in Gervase of Tilbury that the Kings had payments made them out of their Lands not in Summs of Gold or Silver but only in Victuals or Provisions out of which the King's House was supplied with necessaries for daily use which the King's Officers accounting with the Sheriffs reduced into many payments viz. a Measure of Wheat to make Bread for 100 Men 1 s. the body of a Pasture-fed Beef 1 s. a Ram or Sheep 4 d. for Food for 20 Horses 4 d. Thus far I have thought fit to pick out of Tacitus the manners of the Germans and compare some of them with the English Saxon or Norman Customs to discover their Conformity But since in this account from Tacitus we find no satisfactory testimony as to the power of making Laws but that in general they used to meet in Consultation about the New or Full of the Moon where 2 (r) Alter tertius dies consultatione coâ—â—ntium abâ—umitur Id. 636. or 3 Days were usally spent and the Turba or Common Body of those that met which elsewhere he saith was by hundreds being Armed the Priests commanded silence and had the power of keeping Matters in order and the Princes Authority was there as I have noted besore I say considering these things I must seek otherwhere for clearer discovery before which I will only note Judgments given in their Councils that at such Councils as (s) Liâ—â—â— apud concilium accusare quoque discrimen capitis intendere Tacitus describes Judgments were given upon offences for he saith here Accusations might be presented and Capital Matters tried the distinction of punishment * Distinctio paenarum ex 〈◊〉 proditores tranâ—fuâ—â—â— arâ—oribus suspendunt ignavâ—â— imâ—eâ—â—â— â—â—pore Lips torpâ—â—â— Infames 〈…〉 〈◊〉 insupâ—r crate 〈◊〉 â—acitus de moribus German In some Places of Germany Drowning is yet a Punishment as Platerus gives an Account of a Woman tied in a Sack and cast into the River near Basil who was found alive after being taken up at the usual place half a mile below where she was cast in Observat being according to the Crime Traytors and such as fled to the Enemy were hung upon Trees but the slothful unfit for War and such as are infamous for sluggishness as Lipsius will have it Torpore not Corpore infames were drowned in Morasses an Hurdle being laid upon them and the reason he gives of the divers punishments is that the first which he calls Scelera are to be shown while punished but the other which he calls Flagitia wicked and heinous crimes but particularizeth not what they were should be hid and punished by Drowning then follows Levioribus delictis pro modo poenarum equorum pecorumque numero convicti mulct antur pars mulctae Regi vel Civitati pars ipsi qui vindicatur vel propinquis ejus exolvitur and that for smaller faults the punishment was a Mulct of Horses or Cattle whereof a great part was pay'd to the King or City and part to him that was acquitted or his kindred By which we may note a Sovereignty in the Kings or Free Cities or People to whom these Mulcts were pay'd But I leave these obscurer times and proceed to greater light Therefore for the better clearing of the Authority of the Saxon Kings in giving Laws to their Subjects and the discovering who were the constituent parts of the great Councils I shall first note something of the several Laws made in Germany France Several Laws made in several King loms after the declining of the Reman Empire and the Northern Countries and so proceed to some general observations of our Saxon Laws and lastly to illustrate or expound by a short Glossary the Saxon Titles of Great Men found mentioned in the Councils First as the Ancientest I meet with I will begin with the Gothic Laws Gothick Laws These Goths overrun Europe and did not only cause great Wars and Destructions but made great alterations in the Laws and Kingdoms The Goths according to the custom of other Northern People used not written Laws but their Country Customs till (t) Sub Erudiâ—â— Rege Gothi Legum instituta scriptis bahere câ—â—perunt nam antea mâ—ribus consuetudine tenebantur Isidor Chron. Goth. Aera 504.
by whose Council and Advice the Kings used in the making Laws are the Witan Wites From Wita which Womner renders Optimas Princeps Sapiens a Nobleman Prince or Wiseman from witan to know and understand So in the Laws of King Ina we read Gethungenes Witan a famous noble or renowned Wite from Gethungen So in the version of Bede by King Alfred Witum is rendred Counsellors so by Sapientes when we meet with it in any Authors that render Witan by it we are to understand not only Judges but sometimes Dukes Earls Prapositi Provosts Thegns the King's Officers or Ministers So in the Charter (i) Histor Privileg Eccl. Eliensis fol. 117. b. of King Edgar to the Church of Ely Anno 970. Alferre Egelwinc and Brithnoth are called Dukes and Hringulph Thurferth and Alfric are called Ministri The first of which in another Charter is called Alderman and the other by the name of Sapientes Upon perusal and collating several Transcripts of Deeds and Councils I am of opinion that where Wites or Sapientes are used for Princes Noblemen and great Personages those are to be understood that were called to the Kings Council had command over Countries as Lord Lieutenants or were Members of the great Councils So that they were of the most wise and knowing of the great Princes Dukes Earls and Barons and where it doth not seem to import such great Men of Birth then it signifies Judges Which as to the first seems to be clear by what is said in the Auctuary (k) Lamb. fol. 147. tit de Heretochiis Qui Heretoches â—pud Angloâ—voâ—abantur se Barones Nobiles insignes sapientes vocati ductores excercituum c. to the 35 Law of Edward the Confessor where it is said There were other Powers and Dignities appointed through the Provinces and all the Countries and several Shires which are called by the English Heretoches in King Ina's Laws Here Thegne i. e. Noble Ministers or Officers and when he reckons up those who were to be understood by this name Heretoges he calls them Barons Nobles and famous Wisemen called Generals or great Officers in the Army and as to the latter Signification Doctor Brady hath sufficiently cleared it in Adelnoth's Plea against the Monks of Malmsbury where it is said that in the Presence of the King subtili disceptatione a Sapientibus suis i. e. Regis audita where by Sapientes must be understood the King's Judges Alderman Alderman or Ealderman was both a general Name (l) Spelman 's Glossary given to Princes Dukes Governours of Provinces Presidents Senators and even to Vice-Roys as also to particular Officers hence Aldermannus totius Angliae like my Lord Chief-Justice Aldermannus Regis Comitatus Civitatis Burgi Castelli Hundredi c. of whose Offices it is not easy particularly to define This being so copiously discoursed of by Sir Henry Spelman I shall refer the Reader to him The word Thane or Thegen was used by the Saxons in their Books variously sometimes it signified a stout Man Thane Soldier or Knight other times Thanus (m) Cyninges Thegen Med mera Thegen Woruld Thegen Maesse Thegen Somner Dial. Regius signified the Kings great Officer a Nobleman or Peer of the Realm other times a Thane or Nobleman of lower degree sometimes we meet with secular or Lay Thanes other times Spiritual Thanes or Priests Some Thanes were as the King's Bailiffs Praefects Reeves of which Doctor Brady gives account in his Argum. Antinorm Page 283. In several of the Councils we find no particular orders denominated but only a division of the whole into the Clergy Clergy and Laity and Laity So in the Council that Sir H. Spelman (n) Spelm. 1. Tom. Concil tells us Ethelbert King of Kent held 685. with Bertha his Queen and Eadbald his Son and the Reverend Bishop Austine Communi concilio tam Cleri quam Populi and the rest of the Optimates Terrae at Christmass having called a Common-Council of the Clergy and People by which it is apparent that both the Clergy o and Laity there understood are comprehended under the name Optimates Terrae the Nobility of Land So in King Ina's Laws as I shall hereafter particularize the command is given to Godes Theowas Gods Servant and eales folces all People So King Edmund held a great Council at Easter in London of Gods (p) Egther ge godcundra hada ge woruld cundra Order and the Secular Order or Worlds Order which Brompton (q) Mandavit omnibus Majoribus Regnorum veniunt Wintoniam Clerus Populus renders Laici in another part of King Edward's Laws So the Majores Regnorum of King Edgar are commanded to come and then it is said There came to Winchester the Clergy and People those were the Majores Regnorum The like was frequently used after the Conquest so at the Coronation of Henry the First Matthew Paris speaks of the gathering of the Clergy and all the People and then saith Clero Angliae Populo universo The Clergy answering him and all the Magnates and in another place Clero Populo favente the Clergy and People favouring Further we find in a great Council held by the King Anno 1102. 2 H. 2. (r) Omnes Principes Regni sui Ecclesiastici secularis ordinis Flo. Wigor fol. 651. lin 21. all the chief Men of his Kingdom of the Ecclesiastic and secular Order So that Plebs Populus Vulgus Incola where by way of Antithesis or contra-Opposition they are used do signify the Clergy and Laity or Lay-Princes not the common People After the Conquest we meet with the Word Regnum sometimes and other times Regnum Sacerdotium As to the first the Sence is to be understood best in the Quadripartite History (s) Quadrilog lib. 1. c. 26. of the Life of Thomas Becket where it is said the King called to Clarendon Regnum universum all the Kingdom and then saith To whom came the dignified Clergy and the Nobles which Matt. Paris puts out of all doubt by the enumeration that he makes of all that appertained to the Kingdom to be the Arch-Bishops Bishops Abbats and Priors Installed and the Earls and Barons So the meaning is best understood of the words in the last Chapter of Magna Charta that the Arch-Bishops Bishops Abbats Priors Earls Barons Knights and free Tenents and all of the Kingdom gave a fifteenth part of their Moveables and in other places after the Barons it is said Omnes alii de Regno nostro qui de nobis tenent in Capite concerning which the most Learned Doctor Brady hath given plentiful Proofs Magnates Proceres By the words Magnates Proceres frequently found in the Councils after the Conquest are to be understood the Arch-Bishops Bishops Abbats and Priors for the Clergy and the Earls and Barons for the Laity only unless afterwards that Dukes were included However they were used always to contra-distinguish
acquired a Soccage Tenure and Fee-simple Estate Therefore the foresaid (q) Praefat. Reger Twysden fol. 155. The English possess their Lands by â—avour not otherwise Hereditarily So Mut. Paris saith Commilitonibus terras Anglorum possessiones affluentiori manu contulit illud parvum quod remansâ—rat sub jugo posuit perpetuae servitutis Gervase of Tilbury concludes this Observation thus Sic igitur quisquis de gente subacta fundos vel aliquid hujusmodi possidet non quod ratione successionis debere sibi videatur adeptus est sed quod solummodo meritis suis exigentibus vel aliqua pactione interveniente obtinuit viz. So every one of the conquered Nation possest their Lands or any thing else not that he should seem to get it by way of Succession but by his deserts or by some Compact or Covenant made with his Lord as it must be understood The most industrious Doctor Brady having on purpose writ so much of this Argument in his Answer to the Argumentum Anti-Normanicum and out of so many Historians confirmed it in the Answer to the Appendix Brady p. 313.314 I must refer the Reader that desires satisfaction to his Book being loth to crowd those matters which are not directly to my purpose Only I cannot but note that the reason why we so often find the same Lands that have been granted by a Father for him and his Heirs required and had a Confirmation by the Son was because the Tenure was so fickle for want of Homage or Omission of Service whereby they might be forfeited I now proceed to the great Councils that I have found in the Reign of William the Conquerour and shall begin with that wherein the Laws I have spoken before of out of Hoveden were made which are agreed by all to be in the Fourth year of his Reign In general we find Gervase of Tilbury telling us The Conqueror makes written Laws That when the famous Subduer of England King William had subjected to his Empire the utmost parts of the Island and by terrible examples had brought to perfect obedience the Minds of Rebels that they might not have liberty to fall into the same errors for the future he (r) Decrevit subjectum sibi populum Juri scripto legibusque sabjicere Quasdam reprobavit quasdam autem approbans Transmariâ—â—s Neustriae leges quae ad Regni pâ—â—â—m tuendam efficâ—teissionae videbantur adjecit Gerv. Tilb. lib. 1. c. 29. resolved to govern the People subjected to him by written Right and Law therefore the English Law being propounded according to their threefold distinction that is the Mercian Law Dane Law and West-Saxon Law he rejected some and approved others and added such Transmarine Norman Laws as seemed most efficacious to defend the Peace of the Kingdom In this account we may observe That the King solely is said to reject and approve and to add such of the Norman Laws as he thought fit for securing the Peace of the Kingdom and the Ingenious Dr. Brady thinks the 52 55 56 58 59 62 63 64. are those Norman Laws intimated Concerning the Oath which Frederick Abbat of St. Albans administred to the King on the Holy Gospel and the Reliques of the Church of St. Albans whereby he swore That for the good of Peace he would observe the good and approved ancient Laws of the Kingdom which the pious Kings of England and especially King Edward had inviolably observed I must refer the Reader to (s) Fol. 48. num 20 30 40. Matthew Paris to understand the occasion of it and Dr. (t) Argum. Antinorm p. 261. Brady's Exposition or Commentary upon it and how little he observed it What the Laws were that King William the First confirmed Authors agree not about as may be seen by comparing (u) Fol. 343. Hoveden (w) Fol. 138 149 Knighton Collect. 2354. N. 61. Lambard of Wheelocks Edition and Spelman in the First Tome of his Councils Fol. 624. Selden (x) In Eadmerum fol. 172. num 20. in his Notes upon Eadmerus writes very suspiciously of all the Laws that are attributed to King Edward except the Crowland Copy judging neither Hoveden Knighton or the Author of the Lichfield Chronicle well versed in Law matters and who writ long after Ingulphus of whom he gives this Character Qui in hac re testium non tam facile Princeps merito dicendus est quam solus forsan cui ut par fit credamus The Title of the Laws properly ascribed to William the Conquerour The Title of the Conqueror's Laws are in the Latin thus (y) Ces sont le Leis les Custumes que le Reis William grantut tut le peuple de Engleterre â—pres le Conquest de la Terre Ice les meismes que le Reis Edward sun Câ—sin tent devant luy LL. W. fol. 159. Hae sunt leges consuetudines quas Will. Rex concessit universo Populo Angliae post subactam terram Eaedem sunt quas Edwardus Rex cognatus ejus observavit ante eum In English thus These are the Laws and Customs (z) LL. W. 1. p. 170. which William the King granted to all his People of England after the subduing of the Land They are the same which Edward the King his Kinsman before him observed In this Preface we have only to note that the Laws are expresly said to be the Kings Grant and the Supplemental Laws after the 50th which were found in the Croyland Copy being writ in the Red Book of (z) LL. W. 1. p. 170. the Exchequer are by way of Charter or Grant thus Will. Rex Anglorum c. omnibus hominibus suis Francis Anglis salutem and all along the Authoritative parts expressed by statuimus volumus interdicimus prohibemus praecipimus decretum est The Terms used by the Conqueror in Law-giving The expressions Authors use concerning his Laws whereby the absolute Soveraignty of the Conquerour in the point of Law-giving is manifested are to be found in all those who have writ of his Life I shall content my self with a few Ordericus (a) Fol. 853. Vitalis saith eamque i. e. England Gulielmus Rex suis Legibus commode subegit that he subdued or rather subjected England profitably to his Laws Eadmer (b) Hist Nov. fol. 6. num 10 20 30. Vsus atque leges quas patres sui ipse in Normannia solehant in Anglia scribâ—re volens Cuncta divina simul humana ejus nutum expectabant Edit Gal. de Moulins saith That King William designing to establish in England those Usages and Laws which his Ancestors and he observed in Normandy c. all Divine and Humane Things he ordered at his pleasure The Chronology of Rouen saith Leges quas in hunc diem Angli observant idiomate Normanico promulgavit The Laws which at this day the English observe he published in the Norman Language Mr. Camden saith (c) Britan. fol. 109. That
times appointed through England and by his writing and Seal confirmed to Bishops and Abbats Charters of Priviledges whose Charter runs thus Hen. c. Baronibus fidelibus suis Francis Anglis salutem Sciatis me ad Honorem Dei Sanctae Ecclesiae pro communi emendatione Regni mei concessisse reddidisse praesenti Charta mea confirmasse c. and so confirms the Charter of King Henry the First his Grand-father As to the Council of Clarendon about (b) Answer to Petyt fol. 31. ult Edit See Selden's Correction of Matt. Paris in his Epinomis Thomas Becket Archbishop of Canterbury after he had once promised and his after refusing to set to his Seal in Confirmation of the Ancient Laws I must refer the Reader to what Doctor Brady hath collected and shall only touch upon that of (c) Matt. Paris fol. 84. num 20. ult Edit Clarendon Anno 1164. 10 Hen. 2. where those present by the King's Mandate were the Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors Earls Barons and Noblemen of the Kingdom and there was a Recognition of parts of the Customs and Liberties of King Henry the King's Grandfather and of other Kings which were comprised in sixteen Chapters Concerning the Laws of this King see Selden's Epinomis These Matthew Paris calls wicked Customs and Liberties because they subjected the Clergy-men more to the Crown than he and others would have had them yet he saith the Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors Clergy with the Earls Barons and Nobility swore to them all Proceres and promised firmly in the word of Truth to hold and observe them to the King and his Heirs in good Faith and without Evil and then adds decrevit etiam Rex by which it appears that the Members of the Great Council did not only assent but did bind themselves by Oath and solemn Promise obligatory to themselves and their Posterity to keep and observe them and upon the whole it is the King that decrees appoints and constitutes In all the great Councils of this King it is manifest that the Members were only such as in former Kings Reigns only in that of the 22 H. 2. (d) Ben. Abb. p. 77. Anno Dom. 1176. it is said Rex congregatis in urbe Londoniarum Archipraesulibus Episcopis Comitibus Sapientioribus Regni sui where Sapientiores are instead of Barones and for the Kings Summons it is always said Rex convocat congregavit praecepit convenire or mandavit as is most expresly said in that great Council Anno 1177. 23 H. 2. (e) Ben. Abbas p. 86. That the King sent Messengers through the whole Isle of England and commanded the Archbishops Bishops Earls and Barons of all England that they should be with him at London the next Sunday after the beginning of Lent Of the Great Councils in King Richard the First 's time THere are few great Councils met withal in his short Reign he being so great a part of it out of the Kingdom The first I find is in (a) Fol. 129. num 16 Matthew Paris Anno 1189. 1 Reg. That in the day following the Exaltation of the Holy Cross at Pipewel Archiepiscoporum Episcoporum aliorum Magnatum suorum fretus Concilio He supplied the Vacances of several Bishops Sees The Second I find is (b) Hoved. fol. 376. a. num 30. when he and the King of France agreed to go to the Holy Land where it is said that his Earls and Barons who took the Crusado in the General Council at London swore c. of which it is that (c) Fol. 155. num 50. Matthew Paris saith That the King of England convocatis Episcopis Regni Proceribus received the Oath from the Messengers of the King of France In the Fifth of King Richard (d) Hoved. fol 418. b. num 20. we have a full Example of the holding a Great Council by Commission for during the Imprisonment of King Richard Adam de Sancto Edmundo Clerk was sent from Earl John the Kings Brother to his Friends in England to defend his Castles against the King and dined with Hubert Archbishop of Canterbury boasting much of the French Kings assisting Earl John After Dinner the Mayor of London seized on him in his Lodgings and upon all his Breves and Mandates who delivered them to the Archbishop This occasioned the Archbishop being the Kings Commissioner to convene a great Council the next day A Great Council called on a Days warning but surely Summons had issued out before or else it is a great Instance that the great Councils might be called of such of the Clergy and Nobility as were nearest at Hand for my Author expresly saith (e) Qui iâ— crastino convocatis coram co Episcopis Comitibus Baronibus Regni ostendit eis literas Comitis Johannis earum tenuras statim per commune concilium Regni desinitum est quod Comes Johannes dissaisiretur Idem That the Archbishop the next day called before him the Bishops Earls and Barons of the Kingdom and showed to them the Letters of Earl John and the Tenor of them and adds that instantly by the Common Council of the Kingdom it was defined that Earl John should be disseised This Adam saith Hoveden came into England not long before King Richard's release from his Imprisonment The next great (f) Idem 419. â— 30. A Great Council of four Days Council I find was upon the Thirtieth of March summoned to meet the King at Nottingham and at this were present Alienor the Kings Mother Hubert Archbishop of Canterbury Geoffery Archbishop of York and seven Bishops more Earl David brother to the King of Scots Hamelin Earl Warren Ralph Earl of Chester William Earl Ferrers William Earl of Salisbury and Roger Bigot and names no more but saith the same day the King disseized (g) Rex dissaisivit Gerardum de Canvil de Comitatu Linc. Hug. Bardolf de Castro Comitat. Ebor. Gerard de Canvil and others It appears that this Council sat but four days on the second day the King required Judgment against Earl John his Brother on the third day the King (h) Rex constituit sibi dari c. deinde praecepit exigit Concerning the Form of Proceeding in the Pleas of the Crown the Assize of the Forest wherein the Laws made in this King's time are set down see Selden's Epinomis appointed to be given him 2 s. of every Carucate of Land through England and that every one should perform the third part of Military Service according to their respective Knights Fees to pass over Sea with him into Normandy and then exacted of the Cestertian Monks all their Wool of that year for which they compounded and the fourth and last day Complaints were heard against the Archbishop of York and further Prosecution of Gerard de Canvil Hoveden gives an account of the King's Progress till the 11th of the same Month to which time the
injuries which were brought upon the King beyond Sea by which not only the King but many of the Earls and Barons were disinherited therefore the King required Counsel and Aid of them of a Fifteenth Upon this the Archbishop and the whole number of Bishops Magna Charta granted Earls Barons Abbats and Priors having had deliberation answered the King That they would willingly yield to the Kings desire if he would grant them the long desired Liberties The King saith my Author being led by Covetousness or as he means being desirous of a supply yielded to what the Magnates desired so he granted that which is called Magna Charta so deservedly priz'd by all Englishmen ever since and the (f) Idem num 30. Charta de Foresta and presently Charters were got drawn and the King sealed them and they were sent into all Counties two one of the Liberties and the other of the Forests Matth. Paris saith expresly That they (g) Ita quod chartae utrorumque Requm in nullo invâ—niuntur dissimiles were the same that King John had granted and so refers the Reader to peruse them in what he had writ on his Reign It is to me very strange that since so many Original Grants of the Kings of England and other ancienter Deeds being every where to be found among the ancient Evidences of many Noble and Gentlemens Families yet no where that I can learn any of these Original Charters are to be found except one at Lambeth as Mr. Pryn hath observed That upon Record being only an Exemplification in King Edward the First 's time Anno 1232. on the Nones of March the King called a Great Council to (h) Idem fol. 314. num 20.17 H. 3. Westminster where there met Magnates Angliae tam Laici quam Praelati The King required an Aid for the payment of his Debts contracted by his Expeditions beyond Sea To which Ralph Earl of Chester on behalf of the Nobility answered That the Earls Barons and Knights that held of the King in Capite being with the King personally in that Expedition and having fruitlesly spent their Money were poor so that of (i) Vnde Regi de Jure auxilium non debebant Idem num 30. The Tenents in Capite having personally served according to the Tenure of their Service deny the King Aid right they ow'd not Aid to the King And so my Author saith the Laics having asked leave all departed and the Prelates answered That many Bishops and Abbats being absent they desired respite till some other meeting which was appointed fifteen days after Easter By this we may observe who they were that had the power of giving consent or granting aid for if there had been any other Members of the Lay Order besides Earls Barons and Knights that held in Capite the Earls of Chester's Argument had been of no validity In the Statute of Merton (k) Pulâ—on Stat. p. 1. In one part it is said Our Lord the King granted by the Consent of his Magnates 20 H. 3. it is thus expressed Before William Archbishop of Canterbury and other his Bishops and Suffragans and before the greater part of the Earls and Barons of England there being assembled for the Coronation of the said King and Helioner the Queen about which they were called thus it was provided and granted as well of the foresaid Archbishop Bishops Earls and Barons as of the King himself and others I shall only cull out some few of the Great Councils in this Kings Reign wherein most fully are expressed the true Members of them or such wherein something remarkable was transacted Anno 1237. 21 H. 3. The King keeping his Christmas at Winchester sent his (l) Matt. Paris fol. 367. num 30. Misu c. scripta Râ—galia pracipiens omnibus ad Regnum Angliae spectantibus c. ut omnes sine omissiâ—ne conveairent Regni negotia tractaturt totum Regnum contingentia Royal Writs through all England commanding all that appertained to the Kingdom of England that is all who were to be Members of the great Council which my Author explains particularly thus viz. Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors installed Earls and Barons that without failure they should meet at London on the Octaves of the Epiphany to treat of the Affairs of the Kingdom concerning the whole Kingdom then he adds That on the day of St. Hilary there met at London an (m) Insinita Nobilium multitudo viz. Regni totalis universitas infinite Multitude of the Nobles viz. The whole University of the Kingdom which were the Persons of those Orders before particularized Anno 1246. 30 H. 3. By the Kings (n) Edicto Regio convocata convenit ad Parliamentum generali â—â—mum â—otius Regni Anglicani totalis Nobilitas Idem p. 609. num 10. Edict was called to the most general Parliament saith Matthew Paris all the Nobility of the whole Kingdom of England viz. of the Prelates as well Abbats and Priors as Bishops also Earls and Barons and a few Pages after concerning the same Parliament he saith All the Magnates of the Kingdom met and the King himself first spake to the Bishops apart then to the Earls and Barons and last to the Abbats and Priors In this The word Parliament now used that which frequently in Matthew Paris is called Colloquium now he gives the Title of Parliament to from the French word parler to confer or speak together and we find what is meant also by totalis Nobilitas Anno 1253. 37 H. 3. By the (o) Tota edicto Regio convocata Angliae Nobilitas convenit de arduis Regni Negotiis simul cum Râ—ge tractatura Idem fol. 745. num 40. Kings Edict the Nobility of England being summoned met at London to treat together with the King of the arduous Affairs of the Kingdom and there were present with most of the Earls and Barons the Archbishop Boniface and almost all the Bishops of England In this great Council were the Tenents in Capite according to King John's Charter The King in this Parliament or Colloquium requires Money for an Expedition into the Holy Land but for fifteen days there were great Contests about it till the King de novo confirmed King John's Charters and a solemn Excommunication was agreed upon to be pronounced against the Infringers of it and my Author saith Rex Magnates Communitas Populi protestantur in the Presence of the Venerable Fathers c. That they never consented or do consent that any thing be added or altered in the Charters but plainly contradict it so 3 May (p) Pat. 37 H. 3. m. 13. Anno 1253. in Westminster-Hall the Exemplification passed the Seal of the King and other great Men. But it is principally to be considered what is expressed in the Patent * Praefatus Dominus Rex in prolatione praefatae sententiae omnes libertates consuetudines Regni sui Angliae usitatas dignitates Jura Coronae
till the 11 Rich. 2. was used and from the 12th to the last of Rich. 2. the words alterius conditionis are omitted and so in Ed. Fourth's time but the Clause that the Sheriff be not chosen is retained To these we may add That Bannerets were not to be chosen Members of the House of Commons (o) Cl. 7 R. 2. m. 32. dorso No Banneret to be chosen 7 R. 2. in the case of Thomas Camoys thus Nos advertentes quod hujusmodi Banneretti ante haec tempora Milites Comitatuum ratione alicujus Parliamenti eligi minime consueverunt ipsum de Officio Militis ad dictum Parliamentum pro Communitate Com. praedicti venturi exonerari volumus and so commands the Sheriff to chuse another In the 11 R. 2. we find a (p) Cl. 11 R. 2. m. 24. dorso new qualification in the Writ That the Knights c. should be Gladio cinctos idoneos discretos in Debatis modernis magis indifferentes A new Clause recalled but the King being informed that this new Clause indifferent in the modern Debates which only was to the Knights not to the Citizens or Burgesses was contrary to the forms of Elections anciently used and against the Liberty of the Commons he superseded and revoked that Clause by another Writ In the 5 H. 4. an unusual new (q) Cl. 5 H. 4. par 2. m. 4. dorso No Lawyers to be chosen Clause was added to the prohibition of Sheriffs Nolumus c. nec Apprenticius aâ—t aliquis alius homo ad Legem aliqualiter sit electus Concerning this and that in the 46 Ed. 3. the curious Reader may peruse Sir Ed. (r) 4 Instit. p. 10. Coke whose opinion Mr. Prynne (s) Second Part of Brief Register 124. Hist Ang. p. 414. from the Roll and from Walsingham clearly confutes however that Parliament is since called indoctum After this upon making the Statutes 7 H. 4. c. 15.11 H. 4. c. 1. upon the Commons Petition the ancient form for the Writs was somewhat altered and enlarged though little as to the qualifications but as to the manner of Elections c. of which I shall discourse by it self 23 H. 6. c. 15. (t) Cl. 25 H. 6. m. 24. dorso Only Knights Esquires or Gentlemen to be Knights of Shires a Statute was made concerning Elections of Knights therefore in the Writs of Summons 25 H. 6. it runs thus Milites notabiles seu saltem notabiles Armigeri hominesve generosi de natu eorundem Com. qui habiles sunt Milites fieri nullus homo de gradu valettae gradu inseriori de essendo Milites hujusmodi existant Having thus treated of the Ancient Qualifications The Modern Qualifications I shall subjoin the modern which are comprised in short To cause (u) Duâ—s militâ—s gladiis cinctos mâ—gis idoneos discretos Cives Burgenâ—esâ—de discretiorthus magis sufficientibus The Electors two Knights girt with Swords the most fit and discreet of the County aforesaid and of every City of that Country two Citizens of every Burrough two Burgesses of the discreeter and most sufficient to be freely and indifferently chosen c. Having thus discoursed of the Qualifications of the Persons elected before I make any remarks upon the whole it is fit to note the Electors and manner of Election Some are of opinion that as the greater and lesser Tenents in Capite after King John's Charter were the only Lay constituent Members of Parliament so the still smaller Tenents to those that held in Capite and the smaller Tenents in Capite if not they only did elect the Knights of Shires But I shall as fair as Records will give me light by particulars clear this and the power that was given them by the Community of the County to the Knights The first (w) Cl. 22 E. 1. m. 6. dorso Writ hitherto found is only That the Sheriff shall cause to be chosen two Knights and that they have power c. as I have before related in the Writ to the Sheriff of Northumberland See below the Choice in Yorkshire it is to cause two Knights to come chosen by the consent of the County and to have full power for themselves singly and the Community of the County and so likewise two Citizens and two Burgesses with the Assent of the Community of the City or Burrough The Knights were elected by the Community of the County that is as Dr. Brady makes it clear in his (x) P. 33â—34 Glossary the greater and less Tenents in Capite and as for Cities and Burroughs such were the chusers as held Lands in Free Burgage of the King or some great Lords who held in Capite Ann. 26 E. 1. (y) Bundel num 1. expresseth no more but the Election in general and the power to be given the Elected Ita quod dicti Milites plenam sufficientem potestatem pro se Communitate Com. praedict dicti Cives Burgenses pro se Comunitate Civitatum Burgorum praedictorum divisim ab ipsis tunc ibidem habeant c. Before I proceed any further Manucaptors or Pledges that Knights elected should meet in Parliament we must note that in the Returns made by the Sheriffs to these Writs there are found 26 E. 1. four Manucaptors for every person elected and in others two these did engage themselves that the Knights Citizens or Burgesses so elected should appear at the Parliament according to the time appointed In the County of Bedford I find Rich. de Rous Knight elected and no Manucaptors returned but that the Sheriff distrained eight Oxen and four Horses of him that he should come at the Day c. This was done by vertue of that Clause in the Writ eos ad nos ad praedictos diem locum venire facias and this way of having Manucaptors continued till the 12 E. 4. (z) Brief Register part 2. p. 50. though many had none in latter times Mr. Prynne observes That the Knights in every Shire were elected in the full County by and for the whole County and that the Citizens and Burgesses were then also elected per totam Communitatem In all the Writs of Richard the Second there is this Clause more fully inserted than in any before That the Election be in pleno Comitatu tuo de communi assensu ejusdem Comitatus Upon the making the Statutes 7 H. 4. c. 15. and 11 H. 4. c. 1. The Statutes for ordering Elections for regulating abuses in Elections the Writs of Summons 8 H. 4. and all his time and so (a) Cl. 1 H. 5. m. 9. 37. 1 H. 5. were accordingly altered that Proclamation should be made by the Sheriff in the next County day after the receipt of the Writ and the Knights to be chosen libere indifferenter Free Choice free and indifferently by those that were present at the
Oyer and Terminer Gaol-Delivery and Justices of Peace are determined by the Death of the Predecessor that made them Therefore the Statute of 25 Ed. 3. declares it to be Treason if any man kill the Chancellor The Judges represent the King's Person Treasurer or the Kings Justices of the one Bench or the other Justices in Eyre or Assise or any other Justices assigned to hear and determine being in their places doing their Offices The (f) Id. 3. Instit p. 18 140. reason whereof is assigned because all these represent the King 's Royal Person in his own Courts by his own Commission under the Great Seal in the very Execution of the Kings Royal Office viz. Administration of publick Justice to his People As therefore the King at his Coronation (g) Facies fieri in omnibus Justiciis tuis aequam rectam Justitiam discretionem in misericordia veritate secundum vires tuas taketh an Oath to make to be done in all his Judgments equal and right Justice and Discretion in Mercy and Truth according to his Power So he lays the Burthen thereof upon the Judges according to that of E. 3. for the Pleasure of God and quietness of our Subjects as to save our Conscience and keep our Oath by the assent of our great Men and other of our Council we have commanded our Justices that they shall from henceforth do even Law and Execution of right to all our Subjects Rich and Poor without having regard to any Person c. Therefore before this in (h) Nulli vendemus nulli negabimus aut differemus Justitiam vel Rectum c. 29. Magna Charta we find that the King will sell deny or defer Justice to none Yet from hence it doth not follow that if in the opinion of some the King doth not do Justice that therefore any Subject should conclude as the Master of the Hospitallers of Jerusalem in England at Clerkenwell Anno 1252. 37 H. 3. did The Story is thus told by (i) Hist p. 826 827. Edit prioris Matthew Paris The Master waiting a time when he might discourse with the King he complained of some Injuries done him The King loseth not his Authority tho' he do not Justice and shewed the King some Charters of Protection of himself and his Ancestors The King answered with an Oath and in Wrath You Prelates and Religious especially Templars and Hospitallers have so many Liberties and Charters that they make you proud c. Therefore they ought prudently to be revoked which imprudently have been granted to you for even the Pope oftentimes revokes his Grants with a non obstante and the King told him so he would do To all which the (k) Cui Magister Hospitalis respondit alacâ—iter vultu elevato Quid est quod diciâ— Domine Rex Absit ut in ore tuo recitetur hoc verbum illepidum absurdum Quamdia Justitiam observas Rex esse poteris quam cito bane infregeris Rex esse desines Master saith Matt. Paris answered chearfully and with a lifted up Countenance What is this you say my Lord the King far be it from you to speak so absurd a thing As long as you observe Justice you may be a King and as soon as ever you break this you cease to be a King Thus he would make Dominion founded in Justice as others in Grace But I need not add many Authorities upon this Head for by the universal Suffrage of the profound Lawyers the Kings of England solely nominate create and (l) Dyer fol. 56. appoint all the Judges of the great Courts at Westminister and may remove them at their Pleasure and alone make (m) Davis 45. and appoint Justices of Oyer and Terminer of Gaol-delivery Justices of the Peace Sheriffs and the like Officers and (n) Coke 4. Inst n. 4. 14. 114. 117. remove them when they see Cause and the (o) Bulstrod 3. 296. 1 H. 7. c. 25. Prerogative of making Judges cannot be given or claimed by a Subject The King hath also Power to name create make (p) Sheppard's Grand Abridgment part 3. p. 53. and remove the great Officers Ecclesiastical and Civil by Sea and Land as Archbishops Bishops by way I suppose of Conge deslier The King 's placing and displacing all Great Officers and Translation Lord Chancellor or Keeper Lord Treasurer Lord President Lord Privy-Seal Lord High Steward Lord Admiral Lord High Constable Earl Marshal Lord Chamberlain Privy Counsellors the Marshal or Steward of the Kings House and the rest of the Officers of his Houshold Master of the Horse Officers of the Mint of the Castles Port-Towns and Shipping Lord Lieutenants and many more too tedious to be named So that either mediately or immediately all Officers are by the Kings appointment which is not only a manifest badge but a necessary appurtenance of the Soveraignty SECT 2 The Court of High-Steward THE Kings Courts have been various The Court of the High-Steward as that of the Privy-Council called the Council-Board of which I have spoke before The Court of the High-Steward of England intituled Placita Coronae coram Seneschallo Angliae disused since the Reign of Henry the Fourth and now a Lord High-Steward is only appointed pro hac vice with limitations for the Tryals of some Peers of the Kingdom upon Inditement His Power anciently was (q) Coke 4 Inst c. 4. Supervidere regulare sub Rege immediate post Regem totum Regnum Angliae omnes Ministros Legum infra idem Regnum temporibus Pacis Guerrarum The next Court which is now totally suppressed was the Honourable Court of Star-Chamber The Star-chamber Court of ancient time stiled Coram Rege Concilio suo coram Rege Concilio suo in Camera stellata of which I shall have occasion to write something in the Chapter below SECT 3 The Court of King's-Bench AS to the great and standing Courts The King's-Bench the first of them that is mentioned in Ancient Writers is that of the Kings Bench coram Rege This (r) Rex illarum Curiarum habet unam propriam sicut Aulam Regiam Justiciarios Capitales qui proprias Causas Regias terminant Bracton saith was the Kings proper Court called the Kings Hall and had for Judges in it Chief-Justices which determined the Kings proper Causes c. The same (s) Justiciariorum quidam sunt Capitales generales perpâ—tui majores a latere Regis residâ—ates qui emnium aliorum corrigere tenentur injurias errores Lib. 3. c. 7. fol. 108 b. Author speaking of the Justices of this Court saith That some of them were Capital General perpetual and the greater sitting by the Kings side which were to correct the injuries and errors of all others Fleta in describing this Court saith My Lord Coke gives this account That the King in this Court hath his Justiciaries as well Knights as Clergy-men as
do Authoritas rei indicatae vim legis habet So that can be no Appeal from the King to himself the King delegates his Power to them quod Rex facit per Officiarios per se facere videtur they give Judgment for the King not for themselves to that the Laws Authorize them and none but them so that the Kings assent or dissent cannot frustrate their Judgment which they render in invitos against the will of one of the Parties at least because expedit Reipublicae ut finis sit datus Therefore as to the Power of declaring Law the King is restrained ordinarily to the Mediation of the Judges who are to give the genuine sence and Interpretation of the Law according to Art and rules of science and so by their Interpretation and Judgment therein they bind both King and Subject Yet in some (d) Case of our Affairs p. 4. cases the Judge do not only consult among themselves Judges to apply themselves to the King to determine a doubtful case but must have recourse to the King as the Fountain of Justice so (e) Postnati si disputatio oriatur Justiciarii non possunt interpretari sed in dubiis obscuris Domini Regis expectanda est Interpretatio voluntas cum ejus est Interpretari cujus est condere It is saith Sir Thomas Smith (f) Commonwealth part 2. c. 10. to be taken for a Principle that the Life and Member of an English man is in the Power only of the Prince and his Laws so that when any of his Subjects is spoiled either of life or limb the Prince is endammaged thereby and hath good cause to ask account how his Subjects should come to that mischief and forasmuch as the Prince who governeth the Scepter and holdeth the Crown of England hath this in his care and charge to see the Realm well governed the Life Member and Possessions of his Subjects kept in peace and assurance he that by violence shall attempt to break that Peace and assurance hath forfeited against the Scepter and Crown of England So that from hence it appears how equal and just it is that the King should have the appointment of Judges Justices of Peace Why the King only to appoint Judges c. that neither his Peace should be broken his Subjects injured in their Persons or Estates nor his Laws be violated What Judges are to observe There being sufficient Provision in the Law against the violating of Justice by the Judges who are to observe these following statutes 1. Magna Charta That no Freeman shall be taken or Imprisoned or disseised of his freehold or liberty or Customs or be Out-lawed or exiled or otherwise destroyed That the King (g) Cap. 9. will not pass upon him or condemn him but by lawful Judgment of his Peers or by the Law of the Land and by another 5 E. 3. That no man shall be Attached by any Accusation nor fore-judged of Life or Limb nor his Lands Tenements Goods nor Chattles seized into the Kings hands against the form of the Great Charter and the Law of the Land and 25 Ed. 3 (h) Cap. 4. Stat. 5. That none shall be taken by Petition or Suggestion made to the King or to his Council unless by Indictment or Presentment of good and lawful People of the same Neighbourhood where such deed be done in due manner or by Process made by writ original at the Common Law and so by (i) 24 E. 3. c. 3. another That no man of what State and Condition soever he be shall be put out of his Lands or Tenements nor taken nor Imprisoned nor disinherited without being brought to answer by due Process of Law and in another (k) 41 E. 5. c. 1. That no man be put to answer without Presentment before Justices or matter of Record or by due Process or Writ original according to the old Law of the Land But I must leave this to the Learned in our Municipal Laws and shall note some few things from old Authors that may discover how much just Judgment hath ever been valued The impartiality and yet the tenderness and compassion in inflicting Punishment is notorious in Zeleucus Impartiality requisite in a Judge who while he governed the Locrians made a Law That whoever committed Adultery should have both his Eyes put out and his Son being found guilty he commanded the Law to be put in Execution and the body of the Citizens interceding he ordered one of his Sons Eyes to be put out and likewise one of his own that the Law might not be broken and yet that he might not be over rigid to his Son The (l) Neque inflecti gratia neque perfringi potentia neque adulterari pecunia possit Pro Cecinna Orator tells us That Justice should neither be warped by Favour nor broken by Power nor adulterated by Money and in another place (m) Exuit personam Judicis quisquis Amici personam induit saith That he puts off the person of a Judge who assumes that of a friend He indeed is an upright Judge in whose hand the Ballance of Justice neither totters nor falls by the Authority of any Person Talis debet esse Juris minister ut in ejus manu nullius authoritate personae titubet aut vacillet librae Justitiae Besides the avoiding of Partiality Pâ—ecipitancy to be avoided it is necessary in every Judge that he fully examine what is brought before him and not with too great Precipitancy determine matters upon (n) Qui statuiâ— aliquid parâ—e inâ—udita altera 〈…〉 siatuit 〈◊〉 tamen aequus est Senec. Medaea the hearing only of one side for though he may chance to do Justice in such a Case yet he doth not do justly that fully hears not both Parties Allegations It is a very mischievous things when Judges delay the Executing of Justice (o) Holy Court Tom. 1. lib. 3. p. 90. Delays in doing Justice mischievous Causinus out of the Chronicles of Alexandria tells us That Juvenalis a Widow complaining to Theodorick King of the Goths and Romans that a Suit of hers in Court was drawn out for the space of three Years Theodorick called the Judges before him and acquainted them with the Complaint and commanded them to do her speedy Justice which within two days they did and being again called by the King he asked them how it came to pass that they had dispatched that in two days which had not been done in three Years They answered that His Majestie 's Recommendation had made them finish it so soon To whom the King replied That when he put them into Office he consigned all Pleas to them and other Proceedings and since they had spun out the Business for three Years that required but two days dispatch they should die and at that Instant commanded their Heads to be smitten off Court to redress Delays We find in Sir Edward Coke
preserved in Peace Arms are necessary and they cannot be provided for without Taxes The Subjects receive the benefit of protection and by the care of the Government peaceable possession of their Houses Fields and Cattle Liberty of Trade dispensation of Justice and other great Emoluments by its guard and vigilance which require a numerous retinue of Officers of State Justice and War and Multitude of subordinate Ministers Something also must be allowed for the grandeur and port is necessary for the regulating it at home and abroad the maintaining Correspondence by Ambassadors the providing for defence against foreign Invasions and preserving Tranquillity at home in all which the Publick is concerned therefore the reason is very just and equitable that besides a standing Revenue for defraying these constant charges there should be subsidiary supplys upon emergencies adequate to the occasions As Cicero justly admonisheth Da operam ut omnes intelligant si salvi esse volunt necessitati esse parendum That the Subjects be made to understand that if they will be safe As the Subject is protected so he ought to support the Government they must yield to necessity this absolute necessity of parting with a portion of their Estates for securing the rest For though it be prudence in a private man justly and moderately to enrich himself yet craftily to withhold from the Publick and to defraud it of such parts of the Wealth as is by Law required is no sign of prudence saith Mr. Hobs as judiciously as any position he lyes down but want of knowledge of what is necessary Civil War for their own defence and covetousness to part with nothing they can hold makes this restive humour in many That the Kings of England have quitted that Soveraign badge of raising money upon the Subject by their own Impositions without consent of Parliament is manifest since Edward the First 's time (b) 27 E. 1. c. 5. Anno 1299. The Act for which runs thus For so much as divers People of our Realm are in fear that the Aids and Tasks which they have given us before time towards our Wars and other business of their own grant and good will howsoever they were made might turn to a Bondage to them and their Heirs because they might be at another time found in the Rolls and likewise for the prices taken throughout the Realm by our Ministers We have granted for us and our Heirs that we shall not draw such Aids Task nor Prices into a Custom for any thing that hath been done heretofore be it by Roll or any other Precedent that may be found (c) Cap. 6. The next is thus Moreover we have granted for us and our Heirs as well to Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors and other folk of Holy Church as also to Earls Barons and to all the Commonalty of the Land that for no business from henceforth we shall take such manner of Aids Tasks nor Prices but by the common assent of the Realm and for the common profit thereof See for this the Charter of King John saving the ancient Aids and Prices due and accustomed These being not fully enough expressed the Statute of 34. E. 1. though as short in words as any to be found yet is of the largest extent and as liberal a Boon of Royal bounty as any People can boast of from their Prince It is thus No Tallage or Aid shall be taken or levied by Us or our Heirs in our Realm without the good will and assent of Archbishops Bishops Earls Barons Knights Burgesses and other Free-men of the Land Therefore all those who would enjoy the benefit of this Law must take care they preserve the Succession and the two Houses of Parliament (d) MS. Speech second Parl. Elâ—z an 1562. Inducements to supply the Sovereign The Lord Chancellor in Queen Elizabeth's time thus by the Queens command discourseth to the Houses If when any part of the natural Body hap to be in danger the Head and every part hasteth to the relief so how inconvenient and unnatural is it when danger is offered to the whole that the Head should take the whole care and bear the whole burthen and the Members remain uncareful and uncharged It is certain (e) Coke Instit 1.90 the Prince can make no War of any great concernment without the assistance of his Subjects Purses as well as Bodies unless all would voluntarily serve upon their own charges for that neither sudden dangers can be evaded nor Forces raised and all things necessary for them provided nor peace be long preserved when the Prince hath an empty Exchequer for Treasure is Firmamentum Belli Ornamentum Pacis A late (f) States of France Objection French Author concerning his own Country makes this objection That Princes having assigned for their usual charges of the Government Tribute and other Incomes they ought to be therewith contented and not without occasion raise new Taxes to the detriment of the Liege people and contrary to the intention of the Trust Yet he owns this ought to be soberly understood for a wise Physician applies those Remedies necessary without the Patient's leave and will force him though by cutting off a Limb to save his life So when there may happen a necessity urgent and unforeseen that either will suffer no delay or which ought not for some time to be divulged in such cases saith he the King without the States and whether they will or no may lay new Impositions and make all other necessary provisions by the absolute Power he hath to rule and preserve his State and Subjects he not being able to defend them without necessary Forces Therefore in such occasions it is to be supposed that with the Power of Government there is transferred to the Prince the Power to do that without which good Government cannot be executed but when there is not that kind of necessity the States are called Thus far my Author Since therefore (g) Coke 1. Insiit p. 161. qui diruit medium destruit finem he that takes away the necessary means for a King to preserve his people in uncommon events hazards the ruine of the People some have inferred that when dangers should be so sudden that there could not be time to convene a Parliament or that such a Parliament met should for some design deny the Prince Money then the Kings Prerogative might extend to the raising of Money and they instance in the Loans by Privy Seals exacted upon the Subjects even in Queen Elizabeth's time This indeed was the Plea for Ship-money and as the case was stated by King Charles the First Concerning Ship-Money all the Judges once subscribed their affirmative opinions though Mr. Justice Hutton and Crooke retracted after and with great learning the case was argued and Judgment given in favour of the King Yet he hoping by the yielding to the abolishing of it to have stopped the misery of a War consented to an
better Condition though Gentiles than the Christians under the Romans or that it is derived from Gens I am more inclined to be of the latter Opinion finding it more agreeable to the common Use For Cicero (b) In Topicis calls those Gentiles qui ex eadem Gente Ingenui qui nunquam Capite sunt diminuti Gens consisting of a multitude which have sprung from one Generation and of many of these Gentes consists a Nation to which agrees that of (c) Gentilis dicitur ex eodem genere ortus is qui simili nomine appellatur Festus ad Verbum Festus that Gentilis is one born of the same Gens or Kindred and who is called by the like Name So we find the Horatii the Corvine Julian Flavian Family c. So the Greeks use the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for one nobly descended from great Parentage So 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was Nobility which (d) Polit. lib. 4. c. 8. lib. 5. c. 1. Aristotle calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Antient Wealth and Vertue or the (e) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rhetor. ad Theod lib 2. c. 5. Dignity of the Ancestor The first Authors of it being stiled famous Men and Honourable 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In the largest acceptation of the Word as it is now used saith the judicious (f) Tiles of Honour p. 852. Selden it denotes one that either from the Blood of his Ancestors or the Favour of his Sovereign or of them that have Power from the Sovereign or from his own Vertue Employment or otherwise according to the Laws and Customs of Honour in the Country he lives in is ennobled made Gentile or so raised to an eminency above the Multitude perpetually inherent in his Person These are stiled the Nobiles minores for distinction sake The use of the word Nobilis the word Nobiles being now appropriated to those of the higher Rank The ancient use of Nobilis especially before the Roman Monarchy was such that it was justly given to none but him that had Jus imaginum or some Ancestor at least that had born some of the great Offices or their Magistratus Curules as (g) 〈…〉 1. cap. 19. Censorship Consulship c. From whose Image kept he had the Jus Imaginum Therefore the preceding Ancestor was called novus Homo or Ignobilis Some Ages after the Romans were under a Monarchy the Title of Nobilis was given to such as by the Emperors Patents of Offices or their Codicilli Honorarii were first raised out of the lowest Rank After that Arms of Ensigns of Distinction born upon Shields grew to be in may Families Hereditary which was about four hundred Years since as Sir Edward Bish in his Aspilogia avoucheth it came into frequent use that he who was either formerly ennobled by Blood or newly by acquisition either assumed or had by Grant from his Sovereign or those deputed by him some special note of Distinction by Arms also to be transmitted with his Gentry to his Posterity Yet (h) 〈◊〉 Mr. Selden notes that in the Proceedings in the Court of Chevalry betwixt Reginald Lord Grey of Ruthin Plaintiff and Sir Edward Hastings Defendant concerning the bearing of a Manch Gules in a◠Field Or in the depositions taken in the Moote Hall at Bedford it is recorded that John Botiler of the County of Bedford and Roger Tenstal Mayor of Bedford having been the Plaintiffs Servants severally deposed Il est Gentilhom d' Auncestrie mas nad point d' Armes Gentlemen without coats of Arms. That he was a Gentlemen of antient time but had no Arms. But I shall pass from this That which I desire the Gentry to observe is Advice to the Gentry That they are the Seminary of our greater Nobility and that from Loyal Wise Learned Valiant and Fortunate Persons of their Order in all Princes Reigns the Nobility have sprung Therefore as some of them are derived from as numerous Ancestors as any in other Kingdoms and have by Hereditary Succession greater Estates than many foreign Counts and as they desire either to conserve the Repute their Ancestors have honourably entailed on them or to transmit them to their Posterities so it will be their Interest and Glory to accomplish themselves in all sorts of useful Learning whereby they may be Serviceable to their King and Country There are Bodily Exercises they should be well skilled in as Fencing Riding the great Horse and all Military Exercises to enable them to serve in the Militia of the Nation and their diligent perusing all sorts of History and the Laws of the Land will fit them for the managing of Civil affairs and dispensing the Kings Laws as Justices of Peace Sheriffs Commissioners Representatives in Parliament as also for the greater Offices of State Since they are born to large Patrimonies and thereby have a more generous Education and derive a more refined Spirit from their Ancestors they can with infinite more Ease enter into publick Employment having none of those sinking (i) Hand facile emergunt quorum virtutibus obstat Res angust a domi weights of Poverty and mean Education which enforce others to use extream Diligence e're they can mount the first half Pace the Gentleman is seated on by that time he leaves his tutors It is true the Priviledges of the Gentry of England properly so called are not so great as in some Countries where they have power of Life and Death over their Servants or are exempted from Taxes and enjoy other Immunities which are denied to the Commons yet they have others as beneficial in that they make up a great share of the Ministerial parts of the Government It is required by God and their Prince that they should so deport themselves as they may be singular (k) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dio lib. 2. Examples to their Tenants and Neighbours of Wisdom Temperance Justice Loyalty and all the System of Vertues and by a generous Hospitality without Debauchery preserve their Interest in the affection of their Neighbors and that the Poor may daily and zealously pray for them being made the Voiders and receiving the Sportula of their plentiful Tables By this way of living they will sow among their Neighbours the Seeds of all useful Vertues and enrich their Countries and be able in time of need to serve their Prince with their numerous Dependants It is for the use of the blooming Gentlemen I write this The more sage and ancient need only such Intimations to refresh their Memories I have made Observations how fatal it hath been to themselves and the whole Kingdom when the Gentry have been seduced to sleight at first and after as they have been wrought upon by Designers to over-awe or overturn the Government and either by Piques among themselves or Aemulations Envies and Discontents have been brought into the Combinations and Conspiracies with those who under the specious Pretences
Disobedience and Neglect of those who ought to be subject to it So that it is almost impossible to find the least Footsteps of Law that is by far so ancient as Government If we consider the Infancy of the World when Nations were divided by the Swarms that made new Colonies we may easily conceive that Differences and Quarrels would not onely fall out amongst them about Boundaries but within the District of one Government the Shares of distinct Families and Persons would be allotted and these would require the Preservation of those Peculiars from the Incroachment of Thieves Robbers or other mischievous Persons From whence must spring a necessity of Laws to prevent Domestick Quarrels and Injuries and to ascertain to every man his Right and effect those good things which would make the Society happy Which Laws as far as we have any Record of History were first appointed by those who first led the Colonies or such as they chuse out to assist in such a design of concern who being supream over the People had the only Power of making Laws and exacting obedience to them Consentaneous to which the Serjeants at a late Call gave this Motto A Deo Rex a Rege Lex The Benefits Societies enjoy by Laws But however we conceive of the first Authors and Institutors of Laws it no ways lessens the benefit all Societies enjoy by being govern'd by Laws adapted to the Constitution of the People and Government For as (m) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Polit. lib. 1. c. 2. Aristotle observes Of all living Creatures man is the best so he is the worst if not governed by Laws and Judgment Both (n) Lib. 12. de LL. Plato and * Lib. 5. ult Eâ—kic Aristotle agree that Men Just and most Eminent in Vertue being as Gods among Men are under no Law living as regularly (o) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Polit. lib. 3. c. 13. on their own accord as others constrained by the Laws for these good Men are Laws themselves exciting others to Vertue by their Examples Yet since this is but the Portion of a few there is a necessity of enforcing the Laws by Authority upon those that are not obedient to them nor a Law to themselves As to the use of Laws The Usefulness of Laws the (p) 1 de Oratore Orator tells us that by their Authority we are taught to subdue our Lusts to circumscribe and bound our unlawful desires to defend our own and restrain our Eyes and Hands from that which belongs to others They were saith the same Cicero (q) Major hareditas unicuique nesteum a Jure Legious quam aliis a quibus illa bona relicta surt Id. pro Caecinna invented for the security of every one a greater and more plentiful Inheritance coming to us by them than from those that left us our Estates These are fitted for the Diseases of the Common-wealth ex malis moribus oriuntur bonae leges They restrain Men from their depraved Appetites the over-boilings of their Lusts the debauchery of their Lives the Injustice of their Rapines stop the Effusion of Innocent Blood secure every Man's Interest instruct and dispose all to do well and secure them when they do so Hedges are set up saith Mr. Hobs (r) Civil Wars to stop Travellers and keep them in the way that is allowed and prescrib'd and for hindring them from chusing a way for themselves So Laws are made to guide govern and punish Men who presume to decline the Rule and chuse another to walk by that is more agreeable to their own Appetite and Convenience The poorest necessitated Man saith a (s) Fr. Whyte Sacred Laws Judicious Author amidst the Calamities of his wretched Life would yet be more unhappy were not Laws and Government his Sanctuary Oppression the heaviest of all miseries would crush him to pieces and break the Repose of his shortest Slumbers The malice of the Clown the dark Arts of the City would surround us and what we most prize tho' we want the comfort of it no Man's Life could be safe a minute without them nothing could be sure nothing certain no commerce no conversation These protect the Orphan the Widow and the Stranger Seneca elegantly calls the Laws Virtutes Armatas because they compel evil manners into good order for without Laws Men are but a more cunning and pernicious sort of Brutes and where they are instituted and prevail humane Nature is most civilized refin'd and polite It is said of the Liberal Arts that Emolliunt mores nec sinunt esse feros They soften Mens minds and manners they correct that churlishness of temper and addulce and mellow the austere sowre and crabbed Disposition tame and make gentle the Savage Natures file off the Asperities of them all which is equally true of the force and efficacy of the Laws put in Execution What would this great World we live in be less than a great Bedlam were it not for these Political Combinations civil appointments and Laws which in all places and Countries not only curb and command that untamed Pride Fury and Malice which too naturally resides in many But the Laws likewise form and incorporate Men into civil Societies making those persons capable of Living conversing and dwelling together as Men endowed with rational and religious Faculties who otherwise would appear no better than a company of wild and Savage Creatures The Honour given to Law-makers So great Veneration had the Ancients for the Laws that they esteem'd the Lawgivers (t) Stephanus Niger Exposit Carm. Pythag Leges primo rudibus hominum animis simplices eram Maximeque fama celebravit Cretensium quas Minos Spartanorum quas Lycurgus ac mox Atheniensibus quâ—sitiores jam plures Solon praeseripsit Tâ—â—it 3 Annal. Holy and such as had Correspondence with the Deities they worshipped and were while they lived for these great Blessings to their People deified So Minos among the Egyptians makes Mercury the Author of the Laws and among the Cretians Jupiter Lycurgus among the Lacedaemonians fathered them on Apollo Numa Pompilius derived them from the whispers of the Goddess Aegeria the Persians from Zoroaster Xamolxis among the Goths deduces them from Vesta and that Moses received the Jewish Laws from God Almighty we all believe So that as every where we find the Heathens make the Gods descend for their Production and celestial Wisdom to flow into them saith the learned Mr. White in his Sacred Laws of the Land in which little Treatise is comprehended a great deal of curious Learning and who further adds That as Livy allows to Antiquity mixing things humane with divine to deduce the Original of Cities from Gods or Goddesses to make their beginnings more majestic the same may be said of the Laws saith my learned Author if it be Lawful to Canonize any to carry them up to Heaven or fetch them down from thence that Glory is alone due to the
Laws yea to the sacred Laws of our Land And in another place he saith It was not so much the Charms of the Sibyls Leaves nor Numa's Shield or the Palladium that made the Roman Common weal so much to raise its lofty Head as the just and wholesome Sanction of the Laws obeyed and reverenced On the contrary Bodin (u) De Republica observes that the overthrow of Carthage was without difficulty and certainly prognosticated since neither Vertue nor Law had place there Hence the Orator observes That if the Laws be once abandoned or but negligently guarded not to say oppressed there is nothing any man can be sure to receive from his Ancestors or leave to his Posterity Which leads me to the second head of the Benefit by Government which is Propriety CHAP. V. Propriety secured by Government WE find that Plato (a) Arist Polit. lib. 2. Socrates and Lycurgus proposed a Community of all things in their Commonwealth not only in Goods Chattels and Lands but also in Wives and Children As to Community of Goods the Argument that Socrates used was That if every one might call every thing his own and not his own it would be a means whereby a City would be perfectly one On the contrary Aristotle argues That this would create endless disputes For he that took pains would never agree that he who took no pains should have an equal share and in a little time one would be coveting a larger dividend than another and this would destroy the great vertue of Temperance and would allow it no place for that consists in abstaining from what is anothers Neither would there be room for Liberality iâ— none had of his own to give Besides by possessing in common Sloth Idleness and Negligence would be encouraged (b) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Polit. lib. 1. c. 3. because whatever thing is common to many hath less care imployed about it or it is not with that sedulousness provided for because what is every bodies work is no bodies work according to our English Proverb The mean Pot never boils well So he concludes That possessing in common gives more occasions to differences than where every one knows his own Therefore it is more conducible to the well-being of a People to unite in one order of Discipline than in unity of Stock and Community of Goods There was some difference in the modus of this community For we read that Pericles and Cimo pulled down the Enclosures of their Gardens and Fields that the meaner sort might have free liberty to take the Fruits This kind of Community was received at Tarentum and the Agrarian Law at Rome allowed something of it But I believe this kind of Community was little practised but rather every one enjoyed his separate share and some Commons as we have in England were best un-enclosed according to that of (c) Sicut coelum Diis ita terras generi mortalium datas quaeque sunt vacuae eâ—s publicas esse Annal. l. 13. Boiocolus in Tacitus That as the Heavens were given to the Gods so the Earth was given to Men and those places that were empty or unpossessed in several were for the publick or common to all The Anabaptists in Germany were very earnest to have obtained such a Community where they were powerful enough to eject the right Owners out of their Estates pleading the Apostles usage And in our late Confusions among the many revivals of obsolete opinions and Heresies we had some that were very fond of a notion That the perfectest State of a Commonwealth was not only where there should be no distinction of Dignities and Degrees but Estates should be levelled and some that foresaw the People would not easily consent to this as an Essay begun to dig and cultivate Commons enticing the Poor to joyn with them of which as I remember one Everard was the chief As to Communities of Wives (d) Arist Polit. lib. 2. c. 3. Plato would have it so that because Against Community of Wives when every one might call every Mans Wife and Child his own there would be an amicable concord in the enjoying and providing for them But the Philosopher argues against this much what as he did against the Community of Goods especially by reason that the Children would be neglected by the Fathers none being certain whether such or such a Son were his or no and so all Paternal affection would be abolished and all Cognations wholly obliterated and there would be no way to distinguish ones own Issue but by the similitude as among the Garamants of the superior Africk and the Pharsalian Mare (e) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ib. which was called Just because the had always her Foals like the Horse that got them Besides that Parricide might be committed and injury done by Children to Parents which no civil Government ought to allow and yet the Father not be truly known But to leave this Subjects now very sollicitous to preserve their Properties because I do not read that any Common-wealth did ever or not long enjoy the benefit of any such institution we may note that as in other things so in this the custom of Men is much changed All being now so jealous of any breach made upon their Property that Princes are looked upon as Tyrannical and Arbitrary that shall for the necessary support of the Government lay any imposition upon the People without their consents which made in King Charles the First 's time that outcry against Ship-money though the Legality of it was owned by twelve Judges and very ancient Records were produced and much learning and reading shown in the arguments for it But this point is now adjusted to the satisfaction of the whole The English Subject enjoys many choice peculiar Privileges and advantages The Privileges of the English Subjects in their Property far transcending those of the Subjects of most Princes So that any rougher touch upon that tender part must needs gall and the lightest Yoak be uneasie to the neck unaccustomed to it By his Birth-right he hath something he can call his own he hath not only the protection of his Person but the inheritance of his Freehold his Liberty and Property secured to him by Law he cannot be violently assaulted in the one or forceably invaded in the other but the publick Justice of the Kingdom will be satisfied for it and call the Aggressors to a strict account We have such a grand Charter of all just and reasonable Priviledges and Immunities continued and confirmed to us by the Piety Munificence and Royal bounty of our Princes that we may dispute peaceable and happy living with all other Subjects of the World The Government we live under being setled and supported by known and excellent Laws such as for their policy and prudence justice and equity in their composition challenge all the constitutions of Europe in which part of the World are if any where to be
fifth when the Multitude rule by majority of Voices and not the Law so that their temporary Votes were Law We have resemblance of these kinds of Governments in our Corporations Concerning the Democracies in Corporations where in the Elections of Magistrates in some places all Freemen in others those only who have Burgage Land in others a Common-Council solely have Vote and the whole Body or such and such parts have Power to make By-laws If we had no other Argument against Democracy but this that it is of that narrow capacity that it cannot be adapted to order Regions of large extent it would be sufficient to discredit it for we find in those incorporated little Democracies there are more Factions and divisions than in the whole large adjoining tracts of Land about them though the Villages contain a much numerouser People It is rarely found but that in all Votes relating to the public Combinations are made by Kindreds Companies or Factions The inferior sort having equal Vote often out-number the Richer and Wiser and so businesses are aukwardly or tumultuarily determin'd and the meaner People must either neglect their domestic affairs to attend frequent Conventions or leave the managery to a stirring factious Party which is (k) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Polit. l. 5. c. 5. contrary to the fundamental equality and freedom they labour for As these Corporations were first created by the Sovereigns Grace and Favour for the encrease of Trade and enriching the places and administration of Justice so while they keep themselves within the bounds of their Duties are Loyal to their Prince and Faithful to the Government and presume not by their Pragmaticalness to dispose of the Fate of the Empire or by their factious Elections to make disturbances It is very necessary they should enjoy all their municipal Priviledges But so many Corporations having of late acted contrary it is no wonder that the late King upon solid reason of State issued out his Quo Warranto's against them and in all the new Charters reserv'd a Power in the Crown of displacing the Evil Magistrates at pleasure But to leave this to another place I shall note out of the Philosopher such Arguments as he useth against Democracy 1. Argument against Democracy Injustice As first that the common People being the greater number and the Soveraignty being supposed to be in the whole complex Body whatever they approve must be establish'd as a Right and Law (l) Vbi plebs est domina necesse est ut quod plurimis visum sit hoc quoque sit ratum hoc sit jus Polit. l. 6. c. 2. and suppose they vote a Dividend of the richer Citizens Estates among themselves though this by the force of their Government be just yet in its own nature it is great Injustice to destroy the rich Man's Propriety as well as it were for the Rich to do the same to the Poor 2dly 2. Against the Common Peoples Liberty of Elections Liberty being the principle of all Democratical Government it consists in two things either to live (m) Plerisque jucundius est licenter vivere quam modeste Ib. c. 2. licentiously which in Athens and other places was very fatal and as Demosthenes Isocrates and Cicero complain that under the specious pretence of Liberty even Anarchy prevail'd Or Secondly in the free and uncontroulable Power of chusing their Magistrates and this accasioned the contest of parties for Victory hence Crowds Tumults Routs Riots Frays and Quarrells and after all Heart-burnings (n) In Licurg Vide Giphanii Com. in c. 7. l. 2. Polit. Arist Plutarch gives us an account of the manner of some Elections for Senators that certain Persons being closed in a Room where they might hear the peoples Voices but not see the People One Competitor after another was proposed and him who was judged to have most Voices they carried Crowned to the Temples of the Gods Women and Children following him with Shouts This (o) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 L. 2. Polit. c. 9. Aristotle calls a Childish action in so grave an affair it being not fit for any to seek Magistracy in such a way that by the judgment of the Multitude only is thought fit to Rule but (p) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ibid. he that is worthy be he willing or unwilling should have the place Therefore we observe where the King hath the sole Power of nominating Judges Sheriffs Justices of Peace c. though they are of as great advantage to the Peace and order of the Government as Mayors Sheriffs or Common-Council Men of Corporations there are neither Hubbubs or Quarrels at their Elections and they are generally better qualified than such as court the peoples Favour Therefore (q) Rempublicam perituram in qua viri Principes consultant Populus vero imperita plebecula decernit Laertius exclaims justly that the Common-weal must perish in which the Nobility consult but the People and unskillful common Rabble give Judgment 3dly 3. Their Faction In this Government there is a continual spawning of Faction So it is (r) Giphanii Comment in lib. 5. c. 5. Polit. observ'd that at Athens the Democratical Government mostly obtain'd yet in the Attick State there were no less than three Factions according to the tripartite division of the People viz. the Diacrii that inhabited the mountainous Parts who were for pure Democracy the Pediaci who inhabited the lower Grounds and they were for a mixture of Oligarchy and the Parulii or Inhabitants on the Sea-Coasts and those were a mixture of both which Aristotle calls the Politick Hence Pisistratus appearing an Enemy to the Pediaci made himself gracious with the People and so easily got the Government So he instanceth in the changes of those of Milesia by the Prytania which was like a Consulship or Dictatorship at â—â—me So he gives an account of Dionysius feigning himself to be wounded by the Nobility who hated him for his love to the People raised a great Envy and Rage of the People against them and so established himself So Theagenes by slaying the Cattle of the Nobility animated the People of Maegara to follow him till by suppressing the Nobility and Richer he got himself to be Master of all The like we may read in (s) Lib. 13. c. 9. Diodorus Siculus that Agathocles did at Syracuse All which Changes were the Issues of Factions betwixt the Nobility and Common-people which is as inseparable from this sort of Government as the Prickle is from the Thistle or the Husk from the Corn. Fourthly The Philosopher notes That in this Government the Demagogues were most used These indeed were the Bell-wethers of Faction the Conductors of the Peoples Wills and Affections by the power of their Popularness The (t) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Pol. l. 4. c. 4. Philosopher tells us there was no use of them where the Law commanded but where Matters were judged by the Decrees of the
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and according to the Use of the Country for that the Barbarous Nations were more prone to Servitude than the Grecians and the Asiaticks endured with less trouble than the Europeans that Command which he calls Absolute as of Masters over Servants This he calls in reality 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tyrannical Government but Kingly also in that it is firm legitimate and according to the Use of the Country For that he (s) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Polit. lib. 3. cap. 10. Hâ—insii saith Citizens or Subjects defend Kings but Guards of Strangers are employed by Tyrants Kings commanding lawfully over the willing and Tyrants over the unwilling and without Rules of Law The third kind he calls that which among the Grecians was styled the Aesmynetian And this he (t) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Optiva tyrannis i. suffragio 〈◊〉 saith was an Elective Tyranny either perpetual for Life or for a time And this because it was a Command over the Willing such Persons being elected he styles a Kingly Government and instanceth in the Mitylenians who chose Pittacus to be their King against Alcaeus and Antimenides who were banished Such (u) Halicarnassâ—us lib. 5. Dionysius makes the Roman Dictators Such the Cumaeni by an honester Name styled their Tyrants and such were the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Athens Such a Kingdom Timolio held at Syracuse which he as well as Pittacus spontaneously resigned and did not convert into a Tyranny as Dionysius did or as Sylla and Julius Caesar did at Rome and Aratus at Sicyon according to the (w) Lib. 3. de Officiis Orator The last kind he calls (x) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lib. 3. Polit. c. 10. Heinsii Heroic because it was used in the Heroick Ages and had three Characteristicks of true Kingly Government That it was a Power exercised over the Willing Fatherly and Legitimate For he saith the first Kings either for the Benefits they conferred on the Multitude by Invention of Arts Conduct in War or leading them out in Colonies or supplying them with Lands governing those who lonies or supplying them with Lands governing those who freely yielded to obey were in that esteem and had that Power and Authority which was requisite These had command in War and in things sacred where there were no Priests and did determine Causes and all these things some Kings administred without Oath others were sworn to the observation of them by the lifting up the Scepter and (y) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ibid. concludes that in ancient times Kings had Rule and were Lords over all affairs of the City and those at home and abroad From whence and from what the Philosopher delivered in the beginning of this work and elsewhere (z) Commâ—nt in lib. 1. Polit. initic Giphanius with Thucydides concludes That these Hereditary Kings had such a Power as was restrained by certain Laws and they did not Reign as they listed and at their Pleasure but by certain Prescripts of Laws such we may presume as they ordained This was that Monarchy which was known in the first Ages of the World All People in all Ages and all places having by constant Experience found it most conducive to their Happiness and well-being For had there been any other form under which Mankind could have rationally promised themselves more or more certain Happiness than under this all humane care would long e're this have hit on it and there would have been an universal Regifugium But supposing we should quit these Topicks of Monarchy Other commendable Qualifications of Monarchy being according to the Law of Nature and that it is venerably for its Antiquity there are other Commodities wherein it excells other Forms As first that it is freest from the Canker of Faction which corrodes and consumes all other Governments Hence the most judicious (a) Tacitus 1. Annal. Historian tells us what Asinius Gallus replied to Tiberius That the Body of the Empire is one and so is to be governed by one Soul and in (b) Arduum sape eodem loci potentiam concordiam esse Idem another place tells us how difficult it is to find Concord among Equals in Power especially where not only as at Sparta there were two races of Kings governing at once but as many of them as there were Senators or Magistrates which by Bands and Confederacies are restlessly making Parties against each other whereby the Administration rowls from one Faction to another whereas Kingly Government is uniform and equal in it self and when by Factions Commonweals have been brought almost to utter ruin a (c) Omnem potestatem ad unum conferri pacis interfuit Tacitus 1. Histor single Persons Conduct hath restored all As (d) Perculsum undique ordinavit Imperii corpus quod ita haud dubie nunquam coire consentire potuisset nisi unius Praesidis nutu quasi anima mente regeretur Lib. 4. c. 3. Florus writes of Augustus Caesar that he ordered the shaken and distracted Body of the Empire which without doubt could never have been united in one Form again unless by the Direction of one President as a Soul and Spirit Even so we experienced in his late Majestie 's admirable yea miraculous Retauration which effected as great Blessings to these Islands as that of Augustus to the Roman Empire Besides it is a strong Argument for the Preference of Monarchical Government to all sorts of Republics that in all popular States we find all great affairs managed by some one leading Man who by the dexterity of his Address Power of his Eloquence or the Strength of his Arguments induceth so many as are necessary to join with him to effect them unless when by contrary renitency they are dissolved into Faction So when the Senate of Rome was in a most critical Debate An delenda esset Carthago Cato shewing them the Grapes which a few Years before grew there illustrated from thence the dangerous vicinity of so potent and opulent a State as had contended with them for the universal Empire and wanted only the skill of an uti Victoria to have effected it By which he cooled the warm Debates of the Senate and brought them to an affirmative Determination So Cicero often prevailed so Demosthenes and so the Daemagogues in popular States who are (e) Nalson's Common Interest pro tempore Monarchs the very head of every Faction in a Republic being a King in Disguise or a Tyrant in the dress of a Private Man The single Government being freed from the prime Cause of all intestine decay viz. Faction It necessarily follows that it must be of longer Duration Monarchy more durable as being built upon stronger and firmer Foundations than any other Model Ambitions Aemulations Hostile Parities popular Insolencies Senatorian Tyranny tumultuous Elections and infinite causes of Discords are the inseparable Associates and close Conomitants of all other Forms But in Monarchy hereditary
affords us many Examples of Persons selling their Country and putting their great Councils upon ill attempts and labouring with their utmost cunning to frustrate good Designs because their Dependance upon a Foreign State or Kingdom was worth much more unto them than they could hope to gain by honest Service to their Country Supposing both the King and Optimacy be willing to promote the Peoples Happiness yet he is more able to compass that End by reason he hath a more United Power and the Execution of all Designs depends upon a single resolve and therefore may be managed with a certain closeness and all convenient swiftness so that good Councils shall be first discovered in their effects Whereas a great Body move slowly and most times the opportunity of Doing is gone by while they are but half way in their deliberation Besides More Inconveniences under Common-wealths than under Kings cateris paribus as there are many Advantages peculiar to Monarchy as in these three Chapters I hope I have evinced so there is not one Inconvenience to which a People living under Aristocracy are not subject in a much higher Degree than they are under Monarchy For supposing a King cruel yet one Man's Cruelty cannot reach so many as that of Multiplied oppressors when every one takes their peculiar Province to fleece or exercise their Lordliness over according as their Estates or Interests are divided The Covetousness likewise of Senators is more devouring because we may feed one Fire with less Expence of Fewel than five Hundred A Princes profuse Largesses to his Favourites is infinitely over-balanced by so many providing for their poor Kindred and making Friends and purchasing Dependants This very thing must likewise be practised by Senators for underproping their several reputations hiring Advocates to plead for them in their absence purchasing of Votes in their private concerns and obtaining of Offices Places and Estates for themselves and their Relations So that these must require more considerable Supplies from the People who must be squeezed every time any single Grandee wants than are necessary to nourish the Liberality of a Prince who hath a large Patrimony standing Revenue and places of Honour and Profit to gratify his Servants withal The wisest States having made ample allowances to their Princes to enable them to bestow Favours according to Merits or liking Some think that of Ecclesiastes Wo to thee O Land when thy King is a Child a strong Argument against Monarchy Another Objection answered because this Calamity is not incident to a Senate because they are not subject to Nonage But the place rightly understood saith a learned (i) Idem p. 23. Writer whom I have epitomized in the Parallel is a very full Confirmation of the happy Condition we have reason to expect under Monarchy and of the Calamities and Woes which probably attend an Aristocracy For the cause of those Miserie 's foretold is plainly thus A King during his Infancy being not able personally to Rule the Government is managed by the Nobles and thence come Factions and all the Mischiefs that accompany them To close therefore this Chapter we may consider that Kings have no Rivals whom they fear and must keep under as Governours of Commonwealths have which is no small Blessing to a People Kings as Proprietors take all the care possible saith a very (k) Jus Regin◠p. 58. Learned Author to improve their Dominions whereas Republicans are as Tenants mind nothing so much as their private Profit and the very Pretenders to Liberty and Property in this and the last Age have been the great Cheats of the Nation They when raised to govern grew insolent whereas Princes are still the same and their Passions rise not because their Fortunes do not The Prevailing Factions in Commonweals spare none that oppose them having no consideration of them but as Enemies whereas Kings pity even Rebels as considering them still as their Subjects and though I cannot say with my (l) Idem Author of one Year yet I may say of the whole time of the Usurpation That more were murthered and ruined in that Reforming Age than suffered by the Great Mogul and King of France in that space of time and more Severity was exercised by those Reformers than by all the Race of our Kings these Six hundred years And whatever Evil Ministers Kings are said to have yet what that Judicious Author notes of Scotland we may say the like of England That after they had taken from the Blessed King his Prerogative of chusing Judges and Councellors the Parliament did the next year put in I will not say with him the greatest Blockheads and Idiots in the Nation but men of much meaner Parts and more corrupt and unfit either for knowledge or the upright dispensing of the Laws Justice and Equity than any Age had known I have discoursed of this Head before and so shall say no more but that as well as in Antient times the unequal Distribution of Justice hath been noted so the Severity of the State of Venice against their Nobles and the executing Men without Citing or Hearing upon meer Jealousies induced a wise Spaniard who hath collected the Arbitrary Courses practised and allowed in that State to say That there is less of Liberty there than under the worst of Monarchies And for the State of Holland it hath been more than once observed how ingrateful they have been to all their Neighbours who have assisted them in their greatest need and with what a Jealousie they treat the Prince of Orange whose Ancestors setled them in the Possession of what they have as well as to the Crown of England is obvious to common Observation By them their Allies have been unworthily deserted In the matter of Trade no Pact or Faith hath been kept In their Country Mint and Cummin Coleworts and Herbs are excised nothing worn nothing fed upon or necessary for Humane Life but pays something to their Exchequer You pay a Tribute for the Ground you walk on for the Rivulets you pass on only they have not yet found out a Tax upon their Foggy Air. CHAP. X. The Character of a good King in general BEfore I come to treat of the Sovereignty I think it convenient to discourse of the usefullest Qualifications of Monarchs and the benefits that will redound to themselves and their Subjects thereby The (a) Ethic. 8. c. 10. Polit. lib. 3. 5. c. 4. Philosopher in several places compares a King to a Parent and Shepherd but a Tyrant to a Lord over Slaves and a Wolf Difference of a King and a Tyrant The One in his Government having a special Regard to the Peoples Benefit the Other governing without or against Law pro nutu arbitrio reducing all things under their absolute will and Power in such a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as is unhappy to their People and in the Conclusion to themselves The ancient Authors Description of a Good
the Spaniards there were as many Obelisks or pointed Pillars set about their Graves as they had killed Enemies All which and infinite more Places in (c) The necessity of having a Standing Force is for preventing Rebellion and defending against Foreigners as appears in Aristotle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lib. 7. c. 8. him and other Authors produceable sufficiently clear the necessity of a Prince's both having and encouraging Military Force and all are as so many Arguments That it is very necessary and conducible to the Prince's Glory and Safety as well as his Peoples that he be not only valiant and couragious in his own Person but that he understand the Office of a great General There are none more famous in the World than such Princes as have themselves led and headed their own Armies as is most eminently proved in Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar So in our King Richard the First and Edward the First Hence it is that (d) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Diâ— l. 13. Caesar was wont to say There are two things which obtain keep and encrease the Princedom viz. Soldiers and Money For as the great (e) Non ignavia magna imperia continâ—ri sed virorum armorumque faciendum certamen Historian observes By Sloth no great Empires are held together but it must be done by Force of Men and Arms It being (f) Sua retinere privatae domus de alienis certare regiâ—m 〈…〉 15. Annal. the part of a Private Family to retain its own but to carry Arms abroad is a Kingly Praise Such a Prince who hath when a Subject hazzarded his Life for his King and Country shown his great skill in ordering and providing for his Army in disciplining it How a Military Prince prevents Rebellious of his Subjects hath been fortunate and successful hath a Genius to military Employment a brisk and vigorous Soul not only when he comes to be Sovereign himself puts a fresh Spirit into his People by raising their Hopes and Confidence that he will encrease the Glory of his Nation but it makes him secure at home from Seditions and Rebellions For he is very fool-hardy or desperately Revengeful that will challenge a single Man who is experimented to have Valour and Skill at his Weapon much more is he who knowing his Prince such an one and who hath the Power of his Kingdom to assist and defend him will offer to molest his peaceable Reign unless he find some advantagious opportunity strangely favourable to his Design or take some Season before such a Prince be well setled in his Throne as despairing ever after to effect any thing and be in that desperate Condition that if he then cannot push forward his Designs he must for ever live inglorious and miserable Such was the Case of the rash ingrateful and aspiring Duke of Monmouth who to the eternal discredit of the name of Protestant so unpolitickly as well as maliciously raised the late Rebellion against his Lawful Soveraign pretending a Legitimacy which his Father that the best of all Men living knew the falshood of disowned and more than once made publick Declaration of it How he prospered in this attempt the World knows and if He and his Advisers had not been besotted they might have easily foreseen Besides this great and happy advantage to a valorous and Military Prince How a couragious Prince secures his Subjects from Foreign Enemies in the securing his own Country in Peace within themselves the Benefit is likewise great in the preventing of any affronts injuries or Indignities to him or his People from any of his Neighbours for none dare (g) Nâ—mâ— provocare au let aut facere in juriam ei Regno aut populo quem intelligit expeditum atque promptum ad vindicandum Vita Alex. provoke or do Injury to a King his Kingdom or People saith Lampridius that knows the Prince prepared forward and ready to vindicate his People This military Genius in a Prince being supperadded to his other Royal Vertues and Qualifications furbisheth all their Arms sets a fresh Gloss and Lustre upon them and such a Prince being generally successful in his Attempts for that commonly gives the first notice of his Courage and Conduct will have every one readily flock to his Standard to (h) Objicient se mucronibus insidiantium se suaque jactabunt quocun que desideraverit Imperantis salus Sen. 1. de Clem. expose themselves betwixt him and the points of Traitors Swords will have them throw themselves and their Fortunes whereever the safety of their King requires it So Cicero notes that Fabius Maximus Marcellus Scipio Marius and other great Generals had the Emperors Office and Armies committed to them not only for their Vertues but also by reason of their fortunateness to whom (i) Cic. pro Manilio Quibus etiam venti tempeslatesque obsecundant the Winds and Tempests have been favourable It greatly (k) Vehementer enim pertinet ad bella administranda quid hosâ—es quid socii de Imperatoribus existiment Idem conducing to the management of War what opinion the Enemies and Allies have of such Generals as the same Orator notes and the like may be said of Warlike Kings What immortal Glory is it to England that it hath had King Richard the First Of King Richard the First who carried his victorious Ensigns to the Holy Land What a Memorial of his Name and of the Prowess of his People hath King Edward the First left to all Posterity by the advancing his conquering Armes into the very High-Lands of Scotland Of King Edward the Third and the Black Prince What renown did King Edward the Third and the Black Prince his Son win in France when they not only won so great Victories but brought the King Prisoner and what no Nation else can boast of had at the same time the King of Scotland also Prisoner It may be easily conceived that these two valiant Princes and the Sons of that great King spirited the whole English Nation and in that Age the Renown of it equalled what now the French ascribe to their great King The Annals swell with the Atchievements of Henry the Fifth who in so few Years Of Henry the Fifth upon the matter subdued all France So that his Infant Son was Crowned King at Paris It is not to be expected that many Ages can produce such Examples but every Reader of History may observe That in every Age some one or two Crowned Heads carry the Trophies from all the rest fill their Countries with Triumphal Arches and raise pyramids of Glory to their own and their Countries high Renown A strange Factiousness in the Reigns of our three last Kings and the dreadful Rebellion Why our three last Kings could not appear so Formidable abroad have deprived them of the opportunity of showing the English Prowess on the publick Theater as it had been before Yet when they were employed they
what condition soever shall draw any out of the Realm in Plea whereof the Cognizance appertaineth to the King's Court or of things whereof Judgments be given in the King's Court c. This Statute as well as that of Provisors 25 Ed. 3. was made to hinder the Subjects Appeals to Rome or to any other Court in such things whereby the King's Soveraignty might be diminished and this Statute relates to one made by King Edward the First Also in the Statute of Provisors 25 Ed. 3. reference is made to the (i) Anno 35 Regni Statute made at Carlisle by King Edward the First The Statute of (k) 16 R. 2. c. 5. Praemunire for purchasing Bulls from Rome gives an account of the preceding Statutes and further saith Whereas our Lord the King and all his Liege-People ought of right and of long time were wont to sue in the King's Court to receive their Presentments to Churches Prebends and other Benefices of Holy Church which they had right to present to the Conisance of Plea of which Presentment belongeth unto the King's Court of the old right of his Crown used and approved c. then particularly enumerates the Encroachments of the Bishop of Rome by Processes Excommunications of Bishops for executing Judgments given in the King's Courts and the translating of Prelates out of the Realm or from one spiritual Living to another against the King's Laws and Regality c. The Statute expresly declares That the Crown of England hath ever been so free that it is in no Earthly Subjection but immediately subject to God in all things touching the Regality of the Crown and to no other Under King Henry the Eighth (l) 24 H. 8. c. 12. the whole Parliament say that by sundry old and authentick Histories and Chronicles it is manifesty declared and expressed that this Realm of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the World governed by one Supream Head and King having the Dignity and Royal Estate of the Imperial Crown of the same unto whom a Body Politick compact of all sorts and degrees of People divided in Terms by names of Spirituality and Temporalty have bounden and owen to bear next to God a natural and humble Obedience The next (m) 25 H. 8. c. 21. Year in another Statute it is stiled the Imperial Crown and Royal Authority recognizing no Superior but only Your Grace and in the Chapter following the Kings of England are stiled Kings and Emperors of this Realm and in (n) 28 H. 8. c. 7. another of the same King it is called The most Royal Estate of the Imperial Crown of this Realm So in the same (o) Stat. Hilâ—â—◠〈…〉 8. c. 2. Year before the Title of Lord of Ireland was altered into King the Stile is Kings and Emperors of the Realm of England and of the Land of Ireland and in several other Statutes it is called the Imperial Crown I have inserted these to clear that by our Laws the Kings of England are under no Subjectjon to any foreign Prince or Potentate whatsoever And Mr. (p) Tit. Hâ—â— p. 21 22. Selden saith that the Supremacy is not only used by the English Sovereigns but hath been challenged by the Kings of Spain Denmark Poland the Czars of Muscovy and other free Princes over all within their own Dominions exclusive of all foreign Powers and upon the like ground of Supremacy was that Law made by King James the Third of Scotland in these words Our Sovereign Lord has full Jurisdiction and free Empire within this Realm c. A Confirmation of this Supremacy of our Kings appears in what is reported of our King Edward the Third That when Lewis (q) Quod Râ—x Anglix non se submisit ad osâ—ula pedum suorum of Bavier the Emperor had an Interview with him the Emperor stomached that the King of England submitted not himself to kiss his Feet But the King answered That he was (r) Rex inunctus habet vitam membrum in potesâ—ate sua ideirâ—â— non debet se submittere tantum sicut Rex alius an anointed King and had Life and Member in his Power therefore he ought not to submit himself to him as other Kings Whence it was that Alsonso the ninth King of Castile defining what Kings were after he had dispatched the Particulars that belonged to the Emperor says That they are every one in their Kingdoms the Vicars or Vicegerents of God placed over the People to govern them (s) Bien assi come el Emperador en su Imperio Partid 2. tit 1. Ley 5. 8. no otherwise than as the Emperor is in his Empire Whoever desires further Satisfaction in this Point may have recourse to the voluminous Collections of Mr. Pryn and other Authors that have treated of the Kings Supremacy Most of what I have hitherto discoursed relates to the King's Supremacy ab extra that he hath no foreign Superior that ought to impose any thing upon him or his Subjects contrary to his Pleasure and his Laws in his Dominions I shall now give a short Abridgement of what I find our learned Lawyers have writ concerning the King's Authority and Sovereignty in his Kingdom of England and how Wherein the King's Sovereignty consists according to our Laws in former Ages Kings have quitted some of their Royal Prerogatives In our Laws the King is stiled in Ecclesiastical matters the Supreme Ordinary (t) Cokâ— 11. 86. Calvin's Case 215. in Civil matters caput Reipublicae Pater Patriae totius Regni Pater-Familias Chief Justice c. being furnished with plenary Power to render Justice and Right to every Member and part of the whole Body (u) Coâ—â— 2 part 1 2. 24 H. 8. c. 1. 24 Eliz. c. 1. without the help of Foreign Jurisdiction Some Attributes of God in a similitudinary way say (w) 〈◊〉 8◠〈◊〉 177 2â—8 212 〈…〉 the great Lawyers are aseribed to him for the Excellency of his Person and the greatness of his Office as Sovereignty and Power Omnipresence Majesty Immortality c. In his Political (x) 〈…〉 Grand Abâ—iâ—gment part 3. p. 44. Capacity not subject to the Infirmities of others as Nonage Death Attainder c. So no Laches Negligences Defects or Stops of Blood can be imputed to or fastned upon him as is well known in the case of King Henry the Seventh (y) St. Albans vita â—en 7. p. 29. wherein it was unanimously resolved by the Judges That his Natural Capacity doth so far participate with the Politic which is superadded to the Body natural of the King that these become consolidate consubstantiate and indivisible in one and the same Royal Person and the Body Politic which is the more worthy and of a sublimer Nature is in no ways obnoxious to the Humane Imbecillity of Death Infamy Crime or the like but doth draw from the Natural Body all Imperfections and Incapacities whatsoever So that there is
by the Law said to be in the King (z) Sheppard ut supra a threefold greatness of Perfection First of being freed from Infamy and all kind of Imperfections common to Man Secondly of Power in having the command of all his People Thirdly of Majesty being the Fountain of Honour Justice and Mercy The King is Gods immediate Viceroy (a) Câ—k 2.44.5.29 within his Dominions Vicarius Dei As his Protection and Government reacheth to all his People as Subjects so the Allegiance and Obedience of them all is due to him as their Sovereign whether Ecclesiastical or Civil and so he is Persona mixta his Prerogatives are called Jura Regalia Insignia Coronae Ancient Prerogatives and Royal Flowers of the Crown so inseparably annexed to the Crown that none but the King may have them nor can they be communicated to or taken by any Subject (b) Bracton lib. 1. c. 8. Stat. 25 H. 8. c. 21. Nemo terram nisi Authoritate Râ—gia possiâ—et Plowden 136. Jenkins Cent. 7. Case 77. 2. Case 16.17 E. 2. c. 17. Nevil 101.174 All Lands are said to be held of him immediately or mediately he can hold of no Man or any be equal to him as to be joynt Tenant of Land with him and his Jurisdiction is over all places within his Dominions both on the dry Land and on the Sea The Judges are to observe it as a certain Rule That whatever may be for the benefit of the King and his profit shall be taken most largely for him and what against him and for his disprofit be taken strictly neither is it only the duty of Judges but of all other his Subjects in their Stations to help the King to his Right The Perogatives are many and great yet such as are his by the Ancient Law of the Land and what the Kings of England have time out of mind used and are such as are of absolute (c) Coâ—e 12.8.30.2 part Instit 262.496.5 part 11.2.8 necessity for the security of the Government and the Public weals As to call and dissolve Parliaments give his Royal Assent to Laws command the Militia coyn Moneys grant Honors make and dispose of the great Seal dispense with penal Laws pardon Felonies and Treasons make and appoint great Officers Justices of Eyre and Assize of the Peace Gaol-delivery and Sheriffs to grant Charters to Corporations and other Persons or Fraternities He hath the sole Power of appointing ratifying and consummating all Treaties with Foreign Princes making War and Peace granting Safe-Conduct and Protection and all these and many other are firmly ascertained (d) Quod Rex est 〈◊〉 Lex est Regi Rex est Amma 〈◊〉 Lex est Anima Regi by Laws and have ever been and still are in the King alone and at his own Discretion Although there is no need in describing the Sovereignty of our Kings to carry it up to that absoluteness of Monarchy where all things are appointed and reversed by the Sovereigns fiat yet (e) Jus Regium p. 42. we must on the other side consider That the Monarchy which is subject to the impetuous Caprices of the Multitude when giddy or to the incorrigible Factiousness of the Nobility when interested is in effect no Government at all it must be owned That in all Governments a Sovereignty must reside some where and a Monarch can 〈◊〉 no Participants For then it would cease to be a Monarchy and in things that relate immediately to Government the King hath as much right to regulate them as to instance to restrain the Licence of the Press or secure Peace as we have to regulate and dispose of our Property Government being the Kings Property for with the Monarchy the King must enjoy all things that are necessary for the Administration of it according to that just Maxim (f) Quando aliquid â—oneditur omnia concessa videntur sine quibus concessum explicari nequit of the Law When any thing is granted all things seem to be granted without which the thing granted cannot be explained Which warrants the Kings Advocate of Scotland to lay that down as a general (g) Jus Regium p. 77. Rule That their Kings can do every thing that relates to Government and is necessary for the Administration thereof though there be no special Law or Act of Parliament for it if the same be not contrary to the Law of God Nature or Nations The Power and Authority of the Kings of England have been much more unbounded than they are at present (h) Part 1. c. 16. sol 34. Bracton speaking of his time saith That neither the Justices or private Persons might dispute the Kings Charter but if there were a doubt of it the Resolution must come from the Kings own Interpretation If Justice be demanded of the King saith (i) Idem lib. 1. c. 8. p. 5. he seeing no Writ lies against him one must petition that he would correct and amend what he hath done By the Condescensions of gracious Princes such Restrictions have been made of their Sovereign Absoluteness By the Grants and Condescensions of our Kings their Absoluteness lessened that they have obliged themselves to govern their Kingdoms transmitted to them with such Limitations by their numerous Ancestors by Rules of Law Equity Justice and right Judgment in Imitation of their Supreme Head and Omnipotent Monarch That therefore it may demonstratively appear how happily the Government of England is constituted for the Benefit of the Subjects who under so benign a Monarchy enjoy more Advantages in the Security of their Persons and Proprieties than under the most free Commonwealth that ever we read of I shall lightly touch upon some of those Particulars which the Kings of England by reason of several Acts of Parliament they have given their Royal Assents to have precluded themselves from the single Disposal of as in Absolute Monarchies are used yet I hope to make it clear in several Branches of this Discourse That there is no such thing as Co-ordinacy of any other Power or such a mixture as vitiates the Monarchy by a debasing Alloy much less that the Government can be Arbitrary or Tyrannical which hath sheathed the Sword of Justice within the Velvet Scabbard of the Laws and lined the Scarlet Robes of Majesty with the softest Ermine of Indulgence to well deserving Subjects who by their Obedience and Considerateness make their Princes and their own Happiness most perfect For it is equally unhappy to Princes and Subjects where (k) Alii Principes Reges hominum ipse Rex Regum Maximilian's Jest is true That whereas other Princes were Kings of Men he was King of Kings because his Subjects would do but only what they list But to come to the Particulars of Royal Abatements and Indulgences The Kings of England may not rule their People by their Will or by Proclamation as the Roman Emperors by their (l) 〈◊〉 lib. 2. c. 8. The
Particulars of Royal Abatements Edicts or make new Laws or change any of the old standing Laws without the mutual Consent of the two Houses of Parliament He may not oppress the People or in any Arbitrary way take from them their Liberties or Estates under any pretence whatsoever without due course of Law Nor can he impose upon their (m) Stamford's Pleas of the Crown Persons what Charges or Burthens he pleaseth but according to and by the Laws of the Kingdom He cannot do any thing against the Law of the Nation or against common Right cannot change Ancient Customs for a Legal (n) Hâ—ghs 's Reports 254.263 Cousâ—uetudo lâ—galis plus habet quam concessio Regalis Custom is more available than a Royal Concession yet on the other side that Custom which advanceth against the Prerogative of the King is void He cannot impose Arbitrary (o) Petit. of Right 3 Car. 1.7 Car. 1. c. 17. payments erect new Offices of Charge to the Subject may not deny or delay Justice may not compel his People to make Gifts Loan Benevolence or Tax without consent of the two Houses The King (p) 2 Car. 1. c. 1. Coke 12.46.2 part Brown lib. 2. c. 2. Coke Instit 2 part 47 48. Petition of Right Dyer 176. may not imprison without just Cause nor keep any Mans Cause from Tryal may not send any man out of the Realm without his own Consent may not in time of Peace Billet or Quarter Soldiers or Mariners upon his People against their Wills may not grant Commission to try Men by Martial Law in time of Peace nor to determine any matters of difference betwixt Subjects other ways than by ordinary (q) 21 Jac. c. 31. Coke 11.87 Plowden 497. course of Law and ordinary Courts may not by Patent or Licence make a grant of a Monopoly or the benefit of a Penal Law or give a Power to dispense with Penal Laws in some Cases (r) Coke 11.87 He may not have or take that he hath right to which is in the Possession of another but by due course of Laws and may not make new or alter old Courts of Justice unless to be kept after the Course of the Law and not in Course of Equity Nor (s) Sheppard's Grand Abridgment part 3. fol. 49. alter the Courts of Westminster that have been time out of mind nor erect new Courts of Chancery Kings-Bench Common-pleas or Exchequer (t) Fleetwood lib. 1. c. 8. He may not by his last Will and Testament under the great Seal or otherwise dispose of the Government or of the Crown it self nor give and grant away the crown-Crown-Lands or Jewels which he hath in his Politic Capacity nor give away any of the incommunicable Prerogatives By these Abatements of Power and gracious Condescentions of the Kings of England for the Benefit and Security of the Subject No Power co-ordinate with the King 's we are not to conclude that there either is or can be any Co-ordination or Coaequality of any State Order or Degree of the Subjects with the Sovereign nor any Competition of the Subjects Power in his Concurrence with the Vertual and Primary Influence of the Sovereign but a plain Subordination and subjected Ministration of the one under the Sovereignty of the other For although there is a Co-operation of the Members with the Head for the performing some Acts of State and they may seem Orders or States coaequally Authorized in the Power of Acting with the Sovereign in Petitioning for advising or consulting about or consenting upon the Kings Summons to Laws And although in judging and determining matters of Private Interest the King hath not an Arbitrary Judgment but is restrained to the Judgment to be administred by the proper sworn Judges in his Courts whom he appoints to judge according to his Laws and in the making of Laws his Power and Judgment is restrained to the Concurrence of the Nobles and Commons in Parliament yet in all other things wherein he is not expresly restricted by any Law of his own or Progenitors granting he retaineth the absolute Power as in the particulars before mentioned and in the Chapters of Parliaments I shall further discourse In the Rebellion under King Charles the First the (u) Observations on His Majesty's Messages c. The Rebels in 1641. would have lessened the King's Sovereignty and placed it in the People or their Representatives Pencombatants for the Party knowing they had the whole Current of the Laws against them made a great noise and bustle with Sophisms and plausible specious Pretences to captivate the Populace and nothing was more frequent than the Misapplication of that of the Philosopher That the King was Singulis major but Vniversis minor Inferring from thence That the Collective Body of the People and their Representatives were Greater in Authority than the King In answer to which it may be observed That the Aphorism how true soever in any other sense is most false in any sense of Sovereignty For if it be meant That the King is a better Man only than any of us single this doth not tell us he is better than Two and this is no more than possibly he might be before he was King For we must needs look upon Princes as Persons of Worth Honour and Eminency when taken from the People which the superaddition of Royalty did not destroy Besides any Lord of the Land may challenge such a Supremacy over all the Knights and any Knight over all the Esquires Furthermore if Princes be Sovereigns to single Persons of Subjects only and not to the universality of them then every single Subject by himself is a Body Politick whereof the King as King is Head and so the Publick Community is out of the King's Protection he being no King as to them in a complex Body Such impudent Falsities and many more destructive Consequences flow from such absurd Principles And if the Maxim were true the People have placed a King not over but under themselves But they enforce the Argument still further That the Fountain and efficient Cause of Power is the People and from hence they say the Inference is just That he is less than the Universe But the (w) Answer to Observations p. 10. Consequence is rather the contrary For suppose the People were the efficient Cause of Power it can be no otherwise than by translating or deriving their divided Power and uniting it in him Since then they cannot retain what they have parted with nor have what they gave away it follows That he who hath all their Power and his own particular besides must needs be greater and more powerful than they it being a very great Truth That he is the only Fountain of Power and Justice Another of their Maxims was That quicquid efficit tale illud est magis tale And they assume But the King was made by the People therefore less than the People In answer to which it is
(q) Power of the Prince p. 81. Primate is obvious because the inflicting of a punishment is an Act of a Superior to an Inferior and to make one upon Earth Superior to the Supreme Governour would imploy an absolute contradiction though a Father or Master were never so faulty none would be so absurd as to think that their Servants or Children might chastise them When I reflect on that dismal Day when the wicked High Court of Justice arraigned and sentenced the most Innocent Just and Religious King that possibly hath worn a Crown since our Saviours time I always stand amazed and read or meditate on that Tragical Act with a concern next to that of our Saviour's suffering All that black and bloody Scene was acted by Men of and upon the Principles successful Rebels made use of The Preamble to the Treasonable Charge against King Charles the First That Kings are admitted and trusted with a limited Power to govern by and according to the Laws of the Land and not otherwise and by their Trust Oath and Office are obliged to use the Power committed to them for the Good and Benefit of the People and for the Preservation of their Rights and Liberties which they charged that Blessed King to have designedly violated To which I shall give only some k short Heads of his Majesties Answer (r) His Majesty's Speeches and Tryal p. 429. which if they had been weighed were enough to confound all their arguing He demanded by what lawful Authority he was seated there he had a trust committed to him by God by old and lawful Descent that he would not betray Pag. 431. to answer to a new unlawful Authority That England was an Hereditary Kingdom He tells them how great a sin it is to withstand lawful Authority and submit to a Tyrannical or Unlawful That Kings can be no Delinquents That Obedience unto Kings is strictly commanded in the old and new Testament pag. 435. particularizing that one place Where the word of a King is there is Power and who may say unto him What dost thou Eccl. 8.4 That no Impeachment can lye against him all running in his Name That the King can do no wrong the House of Commons never being a Court of Judicature can erect none He owns an Obligation to God to defend and maintain the Liberties of his People against all such Illegal and Arbitrary Proceedings Pag. 439. But 't was to no purpose to show such Crown-Jewels before such Wolves and Bears that were gaping for his Blood and would not admit his only request to them to be heard for the Welfare of the Kingdom and Liberty of the Subject before they precipitated Sentence against him before the Lords and Commons and pressed it That it may be it was something he had to say they had not heard before Hand But nothing his sacred Majesty could say would move those who under a vile and notorious Lye in the Name of the People the Supreme Authority as they called it passed that barbarous Sentence against that sacred Head to the amazement of the whole World sufficient to raise the utmost Indignation of all good Men against such barbarous Principles and Proceedings CHAP. XIX That the Sovereign may dispense with the Execution of the Laws of his Country in several Cases HAving discoursed of the Kings being unaccountable to any but God Almighty when he governs not according to the Laws of God Nature or his Dominions The Connexion of this with the foregoing Chapter upon that Foundation That there cannot be two Supremes here upon Earth in one Kingdom I come now to discover what Power Kings in general and our Kings in particular have to dispense with the Execution of the Laws upon some cases for it is far from my thoughts ever to suggest any such dangerous assertion That Princes in general may dispense with the Execution of the Laws Plutarch (a) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Compar Flaminii Philopaemenis setteth this down as a chief point of that natural skill which Philopoemen had in Government That he did not only rule according to the Laws but over-ruled the Laws themselves when he found it conducing to the Weal publick For as the (b) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Justin Jun. Imp. praef Constit 3. Emperor saith whilst the Laws stand in force it is fit that sometimes the Kings Clemency should be mingled with the severity of them especially when by that means the Subject may be freed from much Detriment and Damage Princes according to the (c) Princeps est supra legem adeo quod secundum conscientiam suam judicare potest Cyrus in L. Rescript c. Judgment of great Lawyers have Power to judge according to their own Conscience and not according to the Letter of the Law and no doubt it was such written Laws as these that (d) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Justinian Novel 105. Justinian the Emperor meant when upon the enacting of a Constitution of this kind he added thereunto this Limitation From all these things which have been said by us let the Emperors State be excepted whereunto God hath subjected the very Laws themselves sending him as a living Law unto Men who therefore in another place assumeth to himself the Title of a Father of the Law Whereupon the (e) Nota Imperatorem vocari patrem Legis under c Leges sune ei subjecte Gloss in Novel 12. c. 4. Glossator maketh this Observation Note That the Emperor is the Father of the Law whereupon the Laws also are subject to him So the great (f) Princeps est supra legem in quantum si expediens est potest legem mutare in ea dispensare pro loco tempore Vid. Thom. in 1.2 q. 96. Artic 5. ad 3. Schoolman saith The Prince is above the Law so far that if it be expedient he may change the Law and dispense with Time and Place as when a Man is condemned to banishment the Prince if he see cause may revoke him from thence and therein saith (g) Gloss in lib. 4. de Poenis Accursius his own Will is accounted a great and just cause Magna justa Causa est ejus Voluntas The Reason of these Assertions is couched in what Aeneas (h) Convenit Imperatori Juris rigorem aequitatis fraeno temperare cui soli inter aequitatem jusque interpositam interpretationem licet incumbit inspicere De Ortu Authoribus Imperii Sylvius observes That there is a certain other thing to which the Emperor is more obnoxious than to the Law and that is Equity which is not always found written Now if the Law doth command one thing and Equity perswade another It is fit the Emperor should temper the Rigor of the Law with the Bridle of Equity as he who alone may and ought to look unto that Interpretation which lyeth interposed betwixt Law and Equity since no Law can sufficiently
Council and the Optimates witnessing are Cynedrid the Queen three Bishops one Abbot and Brorda Wiega Cuthbert Eobing Esne Cydda Winbert Heardbert and Brorda Dukes besides Ethelbeard Archbishop Forthred Abbat and Sighore Son of Siger But I shall hereafter more copiously give an Account of the constituent Parts of the great Councils The King the Fountain of Laws The Legislative Power saith a learned (h) Sheringham's Supremacy p. 34. Leges vero Anglicanae consuetudines Regum Authoritate jubent quandoque quandoque vetant quandoque vindicant puniunt transgressores Bracton lib. 1. c. 2. Author belongs to the King alone by the Common Law for though the two Houses have Authority granted them by the King to assent or dissent yet the Power that makes it a Law the Authority that animates it and makes it differ from a dead Letter is in the King who is the Life and Soul of the Law by whose Authority alone the Laws command forbid vindicate and punish Transgressors This was resolved by divers Earls and Barons and by all the Justices in the Reign of King Edward the Third for one (i) Fuit dit que le Roy sist les Leis per assent des Peres de la Commune non pas les Peres le Commune qu'il ne avera nul Pere en sa terre demesne que le Roy per eux ne doit estre ajuge 22 E. 3. c. 1. Haedlow and his Wife having a Controversie with the King and desiring to have it decided in Parliament It was resolved That the King makes Laws by the Assent of the Lords and Commons and not the Lords and Commons and that he could have no Peer in his own Land and could not be judged by them This is further manifested that the Laws are primarily and properly made by the King and the two Houses have a Cooperation but no Co-ordination of Power for the breach of any Statute whether it be by Treason Murther Felony Perjury or by any other way is an offence against the (k) Encounter la Corone Dignitie le Roy. Stanford 's Pleas of the Crown lib. 1. c. 1. Kings Authority alone and Pleas made against such Offences are called The Pleas of the Crown because they are done against the Crown and Dignity of the King So that it is not the Dignity and Authority of the Lords and Commons which is violated but the Dignity and Authority of the King This appears also in the Power the (l) Sheringham p. 35. See Finch lib. 2. fol. 22. Coke 2 II. 7. lib. 7. fol. 14. Stanford lib. 2.101 King hath in dispensing with such Laws as forbid a thing which is not malum in se and in pardoning the Transgression of others as Treason Felony c. which in Reason he ought no more to do than to dispense with the Laws of Germany Spain or France or pardon the Transgressors thereof if they were not made by his Authority Furthermore it is a certain Maxim of the Law (m) Ejusdem est leges interpretari cujus est condere The Amendment was sealed by the Great Seal 2 May 9 E. 1. commanding the Justices to do and execute all and every thing contained in it though the same did not accord with the Statute of Gloucester in all things None can interpret the Laws but the same Power that makes them But the King may do this as appears by the Statute of Glocester 6â—â— where immediately after the Statute are these words After by the King and his Justices certain Expositions were made upon some of the Articles above mentioned So the Judges are appointed by the King and they have from him a Power to interpret the Law judicialiter otherwise they could not proceed to Judgment and being called by the King with him and under him they have a Power to interpret the Law Authoritativé But the two Houses besides that they can do nothing singly or joyntly without the Kings Concurrence in (n) Sheringham ut supra their make and composition are unfit to interpret Law For such Power as interprets Law must be always existent or in being to act according to emergent Occasions which the two Houses are not And if they were a permanent Body yet they having a Negative upon each other the Interpretation of the Law must be retarded and all Controversies depending thereupon undecided And this Disagreement might perhaps endure for ever and so a final Determination in such Suits would be impossible Now these are Inconveniences which ought not to be admitted in any Commonwealth for it derogates both from the Honour and Wisdom of a Nation to be so moulded and framed that Justice cannot have a free Passage in all Contingencies Not only the Legislative Power it self but the very (o) Hem p. 36. The King may provide for all things necessary for Government where the Law hath not provided or contradicts not Exercise of the Power also so far as it is essential to Government is in the King alone for he can by Edicts and Proclamations provide for all necessary occasions and special Emergencies not provided for by fixed Laws which is one of the most excellent and eminent Acts of the Legislative Power and a sufficient Remedy against all Mischiefs in case the two Houses should refuse to concurr with him in those things which concern the Benefit of the Kingdoms For as (p) Ea quae Jurisdictioâ—is sunt pacis ea qâ—ae sunt Justitiae paci annexa ad nullum pertinent nisi ad Coronam Dignitatem Regiâ—m Bracton lib. 2. c. 24. Bracton saith those things which belong to Jurisdiction and Peace and those which are annexed to Justice and Peace appertain to none but the Crown neither can they be separated from it because they make the Crown If the King should unwarily by Act of Parliament consent to any thing prejudicial and derogatory to His Royal Prerogative such Acts are void by the Common Law and the Judges are bound to declare them so as that of 23. H. 6. about Sheriffs not to continue longer than one Year was by the Judges declared void and all Kings since might with a Clause of non obstante against the manifest words of the Statute have granted that office for Life in Tail or in Fee But I need not enlarge upon this for all the Acts for the King's Supremacy all the Laws and Statutes that over were made put this beyond Dispute that the affirmative Voice is absolutely in the King that no Laws can be binding or be Laws at all without his special Consent and this being one of the great Rights of Sovereignty cannot be separated from the Person of the King although he (q) Suprema jurisdictio potestas Regia etsi Princeps volet separari non pessunt sunt enim ipsa sorma substantialis essentia Majestatis ergo manente ipso Rege ab eo abdicari non possunt
proved that he brought in the Feudal Law of Tenures and much of the Norman Laws and that in his time and for an Hundred years after the Justiciaries or Chief Justices the Chancellors Lawyers Ministerial Officers and under-Judges Earls Sheriffs Bailiffs Hundredaries c. were all Normans likewise the Military Men and Lords of Mannors mostly were such and in his Preface to the Norman History and his Answers to the forementioned Authors every where clears it and proves That though the Conqueror See for proof of the whole Eadmer Hist Novel fol. 6. num 10 20 30. Ingulph fol. 512. a. num 50. That these Great Barons as Tenents in Capite had power to make Laws and Constitutions to bind their Sub-Feudataries is apparent by what Malmsbury de 〈◊〉 Reg. lib. 3. saith That the Laws of W. Fitz-Ozborn Earl of Hereford remained still in force That no Soldier for any Offence should pay above 7 s. The Conqueror's Liberality to the Normans in the first beginning of his Reign promised fair Matters yet he observed no more of those Laws than served for his own interest Yet he also saith That where any Relaxation of the Rigor of the Feudal Laws was the benefit principally accrued to the Norman English who indeed were as active as could be expected to obtain ease to themselves and claim the Advantage of all the favourable Laws had been used in the Saxon times but they themselves were great Oppressors of those under them These Matters therefore being so copiously discoursed of by the learned Doctor I shall pass that whole matter by and come to the third Particular Sir Roger Twysden notes in the Conquerors Policy and so directly speak to the Constitutions of his Great Councils and his Sovereignty in making or confirming Laws As to the third Particular First it is clear that the Conqueror divided the Land among his great Men the Officers and Soldiers for proof of which we need no more but the Testimony of Gervase of (n) Black Book of the Exchequer Post regni conquisitionem post justam Rebellium subversionem facta est inquisitio diligens qui fuerint qui contra Regem in bello dimicantes per fugam se salvaverint hiis omnibus haeredibus eorum qui in bello occubuerunt spes omnis c. praeclusa Tilbury who saith That after the Conquest of the Kingdom and just subversion of the Rebels when the King himself and his great Men had viewed and surveyed their new Acquists there was a strict enquiry made who there were that fighting against the King had saved themselves by flight From these and the Heirs of such as were slain in Fight all hopes of possessing either Lands or Rents were cut off But such as were called and urged to fight against King William and did not if in Process of time they could obtain the favour of their Lords and Masters by an humble Obedience and Obsequiousness they might possess something in their own Persons without hopes of Succession their Children only enjoying it afterwards at the will of their Lords to whom when they became odious they were every where forced from their Possessions Because some are prejudiced against the judicious Doctor Brady for asserting the Conquerours changes that he made I hope they will give ear to what the learned Selden affirms thus * Ex quo cis Normannorum adventum praeter ipsum Regem non fuit in Anglia is qui Allodii ut lequantur Jure sundum possederit cum scilicet aliis ad unum omnes siduciarios proâ—e dixeris Dominos superiorem investiâ—urae Anctâ—rem interpesita side perpetuo agnâ—scâ—ntes Lib. 2. Jan. Ang. That some while since the coming in of the Normans there was not in England except the King himself any one who held Land in right of Freehold as they term it since in truth one may call all others to a Man only Lords in trust of what they had as those who by swearing Fealty and doing Homage did perpetually own and acknowledge a Superior Lord of whom they held and by whom they were invested in their Estates So he Now this Fealty and Homage is now held no kind of Slavery but then it was as I have elsewhere noted Let us hear what the same Mr. Selden a little below saith That the Conqueror did not totally change the Constitution of the Laws Probe tametsi dixeris eversum secundum quod disputant Jurisconsulti Anglicum Imperium Id. Gervas Tilâ— c. 23. Oblatis vomeribus in signum desicientis Agriculturae although we may truly say according to what Lawyers dispute That the English Empire and Government was overthrown by him Thus far that learned Man Let us now return to the Exchequer-book where we find That when a common miserable Complaint of the Natives came to the King that they thus exposed and spoiled of all things should be compelled to pass into other Countries At length after Consultation upon these things it was decreed That what they could by their deserts and lawful Bargain obtain from their Lords The English compound with their Lords they should hold by unviolable Right but should not claim any thing from the time the Nation was conquered under the Title of Succession or Descent Therefore he saith they were obliged by studied Compliance and Obedience to purchase their Lords Favour It is true that in the 55th Law of (o) LL. Gulielm primi Edit Twysden p. 170. William the Conqueror it is said That he wills and firmly commands and grants that all Freemen liberi Homines of the whole Monarchy of his Kingdom may have and hold their Lands and Possessions well and in (p) In pace libere ab omni exactione injusâ—a ab omni tallagio Peace free from all unjust Exactions and Tallage that is extraordinary Impositions and Taxes so as nothing be exacted or taken unless their free services which of Right they ought and are bound to perform to us and as it was appointed to them and given and granted to them by us as a perpetual Right of Inheritance by the Common Council of the whole Kingdom In which we may observe The English have little Benefit by his Relaxation of the Feudal Law that this was no Magna Charta made to English Men these liberi Homines were such as held in Military Service as appears by the 58th Law following and those then were Normans and the Relaxations to them were that these Fees were made Hereditary which was not frequent among Feudataries in those days and the Complaints that were made after and the amendments that Hen. 1. promised were mostly about the hard Taxes and Exactions Therefore I may conclude That the ordinary English tho' many of them might live upon the Lands they and their Ancestors had enjoyed yet their Tenure was changed and they were but Vassals to other Lords 'till by little and little by the ways I have mentioned under the first Heads they
William the Conquerour as a token of his Victory laid aside the greatest part of the English Laws and brought in the customs of Normandy and commanded Pleadings to be in French Jo. Brompton Abbat of Jorval gives us an account of the proper Laws of William the Conquerour Brompton's Account of the proper Laws of the Conqueror which he recites under four Heads and they are only concerning Pleas de examine Forensi and Mr. Selden gives this Character of him that he was Diligentissimus rerum nostrarum maxime autem Legum vetustiorum Indagator These are by way of Mandate thus W. Dei gratia Rex Anglorum omnibus ad quos scriptum hoc perveniat salutem Mando Praecipio per totam Anglicam Nationem custodiri As to the constituent Parts of the Great Councils in the Conquerour's time in many of them we have many Bishops names The Members of the Great Councils in the Conqueror's time and no others not so much as the Principes Primates or Magnates in general Anno 1071. 5 W. 1. the Plaint of (d) Rad. de Diceto col 483. num 30. Concil tom 2. fol. 4. Wulstan Bishop of VVorcester is said to be ended in Concilio celebrato in loco qui vocatur Pedreda coram Rege Doroberniae Archiepiscopo Primatibus totius Regni before the King the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Nobility or Prime Persons of the whole Kingdom The Election of (e) Gervas Dorobern col 1653. lin 5. Lanfranc Archbishop of Canterbury about this time or the year before is said to be thus the Seniors of the said Church electing him cum Episcopis ac Principibus Clero Populo Angliae in Curia Regis in Assumptione Sanctae Mariae Here the Episcopi Principes Bishops and Princes the Cleri Populus the Clergy and People or Laity were the same persons and only expressive of one another In the Charter (f) MS. in Bibl. Cotton sub essigie Vespas A. 19. e Chron. Rad. de Diceto Spelm. Concil Tom. 2. fol. 14. of William the Conqueror Anno 1077. 11 Regni after the Names of several Archbishops Bishops Earls and other Seniors Robert de Oyley Hamo dapifer signed it many illustrious Persons and Princes of divers Orders saith the Author being omitted Then is added His etiam illo tempore a Regia potestate è diversis Provinciis Vrbibus to this Universal Synod at Westminster were called In this the (g) Fol. 651. lin 22. Principes diversi Ordinis were the great dignified Clergy and the Temporal Nobility which is explained by Florence of Worcester speaking of such a like Convention 3 H. 1. Rex fuit apud Westmonasterium eo omnes Principes Regni Ecclesiastici secularis Ordinis and (h) Fol. 67. B. 20. Anno 1102. 3 H. 1. Eadmer of this very great Council 3 H. 1. says Primates Regni utriusque Ordinis huic conventui affuerunt that is The Princes or great Men of the Clergy and Laity which were no other but the Archbishops Bishops Abbats and Priors of the one Order and the Dukes Earls Barons and greater Tenents in Capite of the other and for the expression è diversis Provinciis Vrbibus (i) Fol. 302. Doctor Brady hath sufficiently explained it in his Answer to the Argumentum Anti-Normanicum In a Charter of this King for changing the (k) Monast vol. 1. fol. 44. Anno 1084. 18 W. Conqu Canons of Duresm into Monks it is said Haec Charta confirmata est apud Westmonasterium in Concilio meo Anno Regni 18. praesentibus omnibus Episcopis Baronibus meis In the Charter of the same (l) Spelm. Concil tom 2. fol. 14. e MS. penes Dec. Capit. B. Pauli Lond. A. fol. 1 2. King about separating of Ecclesiastic Pleas from Civil it is thus expressed William by the Grace of God King of England to R. Bainard G. de Magnavilla and P. de Valoines and all his Fideles of Essex Hereford-shire and Middlesex Know they and all other his Fideles which remain in England that he hath (m) Leges quae non bene c. Communt Concilio Concilio Arâ—â—iepisct porum Epi coporum Abbatum omnium Principum Râ—gni mei emendand is judiâ—avi propterea mando Regia Auâ—loritate â—racipio c. thought fit with his Common Council and the Council of Archbishops Bishops and Abbats and of all the Princes of his Kingdom to amend the Episcopal Laws which were neither well nor according to the command of the Holy Canons before his time observed in his Kingdom Therefore he saith he commands and by his Royal Authority enjoyns that no Bishop or Arch-deacon hold their Pleas any longer in the Hundred From all which we may observe Remarks upon what before is laid down First That the Conqueror introduced the Feudal Laws of the Normans and according to them disposed of the Lands of the conquered Saxons to be held of his Norman Followers and that he brought in several others of the Laws and Customs of his Country Secondly That he difficultly granted to his People the Laws of King Edward and those he amended at his pleasure and all that he either confirmed or established he did by his Royal Prerogative using the single Person in the Sanction of them and the Imperative in the commanding or forbiding and those Laws which properly may be called his own were by way of Charter or Mandate and in the Councils purely Ecclesiastical the King summoned them as is apparent in (n) Annal. Binaiae tom 3. part 2. fol. 249. Hoveden where he saith eodem Anno i. e. 10703 Regni Concilium magnum in Octavis Paschae Wintoniae celebratum est jubente praesente Rege W. c. of which more below The great Selden notes as the Members of the Great Council in the time of the Norman Kings for the Barons such as had 13 Knights Fees and a third part His words are Interfuere Parliamentis sub Normannorum tempora quotquot 13 Feudis Militaribus 3 unius parte investiti Barones ab amplis praediis ita dicti Jan. Ang. p. 139. Thirdly There are no Members of these great Councils mentioned but the Archbishops Bishops and Abbats for the Clergy and the Optimates and Principes for the Laity Fourthly That though the sole Power of enacting Laws was in himself yet he used the Advice of his Common Council of his Kingdom as is expressed in the 55th Law thus Prout statutum est eis illis a nobis datum concessum jure haereditario in perpetuum per Commune Concilium totius Regni nostri praedicti which Commune Concilium consisted of the Bishops Abbats Earls Barons and principal Tenents in Capite as is every where clear no Commons having Vote or otherwise represented Lastly (o) Hist Novel p. 6. num 30. Non sinebat quicquam statuere ant prohibere nisi quae suae voluntati accommoda
together with Judges and King's Council Citizens Burgesses of Parliament and Barons of the Cinque-Ports being usually summoned to the one but to the other some few Spiritual and Temporal Lords only without (x) Brief Register part 1. pag. 187. to 192. any Judges Assistants Knights Citizens Burgesses or Barons of the Cinque-Ports or some few of them only and divers who were no usual Lords or Barons of Parliament as Mr. Prynn hath made evident and the Rolls themselves in the Margin notes them by de Concilio summonito or deveniendo ad Concilium which some Antiquaries having not noted have confounded them SECT 4. Of the Judicature of the House of Lords IT is evident that the Lords in Parliament have ever been the usual Judges not only in all criminal and civil causes 6. The Lords Judicature proper for Parliaments to judg or punish and Writs of Errors but likewise in all cases of Precedencies and Controversies concerning Peers and Peerage which Power was in them as the King 's Supreme Court before there were any Knights Citizens or Burgesses summoned to our Parliaments So Hoveden (y) Annal. pars poster p. 561. ad 566. is express in the case of Sanctius King of Navar and Alphonsus King of Castile Comites Barones Regalis Curiae Angliae adjudicaverunt Anno 1177. 23 H. 2. So Fleta in Ed. the First 's time writes (z) Habet enim Rex Curiam suam in Concilio suo in Parliamentis suis praesentibus Pralatis Comitibus Baronibus Proceribus aliis viris peritis ubi terminatae sunt dubitationes judiciorum Lib. 2. c. 2. p. 66. thus The King hath his Court in his Council in his Parliaments there being present the Prelates Earls Barons Nobles and other skillful Men viz. the Judges Assistants where are ended the doubts of Judgments This Particular of the Jurisdiction of the House of Lords is so fully in every Branch of it proved by Mr. Prynn in his Plea for the Lords House that it were an Injury to the inquisitive Reader not to referr him to that Treatise for full Satisfaction therefore I shall only pick out a very few out of a Manuscript I have of the Priviledges belonging to the Baronage of England and Mr. Prynn In the fourth of King (a) Roâ— Parl. 4 E. 3. m. 7. num 3. Judgment of Lords on John Mautravers Edward the Third the Peers Earls and Barons assembled at Westminster saith the Record have strictly examined and thereupon assented and agreed that John Mautravers is guilty of the death of Esmon Earl of Kent Uncle of our Lord the King that now is wherefore the said Peers of the Land and Judges of Parliament judged and awarded that he the said John should be drawn hanged and beheaded In the first of R. 2. John Lord of (b) Rot. Par. 1 R. 2. m. 6. num 38 39. Gomenys and William de Weston were brought before the Lords sitting in the white Chamber On John Lord of Gâ—menys and William Weston for delivering up Forts to the Enemy and were severally charged at the Commandment of the Lords by Sir Richard Scroop Knight Steward of the Kings House William Weston being accused for rendring the Castle of Outhrewike and John Lord of Gomenys for rendring the Castle of Ards. They both made plausible defences and Sir Rich. Scroop Steward tells William that the Lords sitting in full Parliament do adjudge him to death But because our Lord the King is not yet informed of the manner of this Judgment the execution thereof shall be respited till the King be informed thereof and the like Sentence he passed upon John Lord of Gomenies only adding that he being a Gentleman and Banneret should be beheaded There are many more Examples of Judgments given in Capital matters upon Bergo de Bayons 4 E. 3. m. 7. num 4. Thomas de Gurny eadem membrana num 5. and others and for Offences not Capital of Richard Lions 59 E. 3. m. 7. William le Latymer 42 E. 3. m. 2. William Ellis ibid num 31 John Chichester and Botesha 1 R. 2. num 32. Alice Piers Ibid. num 41. Mr. Antiquity of Judgment by Peeâ—s Prynn (c) Plea for Lords p. 203. Hist lib. 4. shews this Jurisdiction out of Historians even from Cassibellan out of Geoffrey of Monmouth Also Anno 924. of Elfred a Nobleman who opposed King Aethelstan's Title and had his Lands adjudged by the Peers forfeit to him the Words of the King are Et eas accepi (d) Malmsb. de Gest is Reg. lib. 2. c. 6. p. 62. Spelman Conc. Tom. 1. p. 407 408. Anno 1043. quemadmodum judicaverunt omnes â—ptimates Regni Anglorum So Earl Godwin having murdred Prince Alfred Brother to King Edward the Confessor being fled into Denmark and hearing of King Edward's Piety and Mercy returned and came to London to the King who then held a Great Council and denied the Fact and put himself upon the (e) vnde super hoc pono me in consideratione Curiae vestrae Chron. Brompton col 937 938. consideration of the Kings Court and the King speaks to the Earls and Barons thus Volo quod inter nos in illa appellatione rectum judicium decernatis debitam justiciam faciatis and after it is said Quicquid judicaverint per omnia ratificavit So in the Constitutions of (f) An. 1164. M. Paris 94. Sicut Barones caeteri debent interesse judiciis Curiae Regis cum Baronibus quousque perveniatur in judicio ad diminutionem membrorum vel ad mortem The House of Lords the King's Court of Barons Clarendon it is appointed That the Archbishop Bishops and those Clergy that held in Capite as by Barony should be Parties in the Judgments of the Kings Court as other Barons ought with the other Barons till it come in Judgment to the loss of Member or to Death So in the Case of Tho. Becket Archbishop of Canterbury Anno 1165. 11 H. 2. we find in Hoveden parte post p. 494 495. that Barones Curiae Regis judicaverunt eum esse in misericordia Regis and afterwards when he would not yield to the Kings Will he (g) Dixit Baronibus suâ—s Cito facite mihi judicium de illo qui homo meus Ligeus est stare Juri in Curia mea recusat saith to his Barons Quickly make to me Judgment of him who is my Liege Man and refuseth to stand to the Law in my Court The Barons going out judg'd him fit to be seiz'd on and sent to Prison and the Historian saith tunc misit Rex Reginaldum Comitem Cornubiae Robertum Comitem Leicestriae ad indicandum ei judicium de illo factum Anno 1208. King (h) Anno 10 Johan Mat. Paris p. 218. John exacted Pledges of his Subjects and amongst others of William de Breause who said If he had offended the King he would be ready to answer his Lord and that without Hostages secundum judicium
Curiae suae Baronum Parium suorum So Anno 1240. 24 H. 3. (i) Graviter accusatus coram Rege Curia tota Lond. Mat. Westm 153. Matthew Paris saith That Hubert de Burgo Earl of Kent was grievously accused before the King and his whole Court and it was adjudged he should resign to the King four of his Castles I cannot omit one memorable passage that (k) Mat. Westm Anno 1260. p. 295 296. Anno 1260. 44 H. 3. there falling out a difference betwixt King Hen. 3. Prince Edward his Son Simon Montfort and other Nobles the King called his Baronage to St. Pauls and there it being urged that Prince Edward had done some injuries to the King he offered to prove himself innocent before the King and his Uncle who was King of the Romans saying Who are Peers of Prince Edward That none of (l) Omnes alios Barones Comites sibi de â—ure non esse Pares nec sâ—â—s in eum excercerâ— disâ—ussiones the rest of the Barons and Earls were by right his Peers nor ought to exercise upon him their Discussions of the matter By which it appears that he judged himself to be something more than a Peer of the Realm being the Heir apparent of the Crown I might fill a large Volum with the Histories and Records to prove this but since Levellers and the House of Commons that voted the House of Lords dangerous and useless have received such deadly wounds by Mr. Prynne in his Plea for the Lords who was once one of their own Champions I think it needless to whet those Weapons again since they always will be in readiness for any one to make use of if need require and shall only obviate one objection that may be urged That whatever the usage was before the Representatives of the Commons An Objection That after the House of Commons were admitted the Jurisdiction of the Lords House was lessened Answered yet the Commons after were often admitted to a share of Judicature in some cases But I shall give a few Instances how after this change of the Constitution of Parliament still this power of Judicature remained in the King and House of Lords Roger de (m) 4 E. 3. num 11.28 E. 3. num 9 10. Mortimer being accused of High Treason 4 E. 3. for the Murther of King Edward 2. after his resignation and unlawful deposition Knighton (n) De Event Angliae lib. 3. c. 16. col 1556 1557. giving an account of the proceedings agreeable to the Parliament Roll saith Rex praecepit Comitibus Baronibus caeteris Magnatibus Regni justum judicium ferre super praedicto Rogero de Mortimer So at the Parliament held at Salisbury 7 R. 2. W. de Zouch is said to be called to the Parliament to stand to the Judgment (o) Ad standum judicio Regis Domincrum Walâ—ingham p. 334. Hist Ang. Hypodig Neust p. 141. of the King and the Lords So Michael de la Pole Earl of Suffolk and Chancellor of England 10 R. 2. (p) Rot. Parl. 10 R. 2. num 6. ad 18. was accused by the Commons in full Parliament before the King Bishops and Lords and at last it is said The Lords in full Parliament gave judgment against him In the Parliament 11 R. 2. Thomas Duke of Gloucester offered to put himself upon his Tryal as the Lords of the Parliament would award c. After which the Lords as well Spiritual as Temporal claimed their Liberties and Franchises namely That all weighty matters in the same Parliament which should be after moved touching the Peers of the Land should be judged and determined by them by the course of Parliament and not by the Civil Law nor yet by the Common Law of the Land used in other Courts of the Realm Yet this seems a very high Demand for they have not Juris dandi but dati Jurisdictionem as they are a Court of Ministerial Jurisdiction being the Court of the King's Barons in Parliament And though when upon Writ of Error (q) Egerton sect 4.22 23. any Judgment in the King's Bench is examined in the House of Lords and there affirmed or reversed the Judgment is said to be affirmed or reversed in Parliament yet we cannot conclude they have the Power of the High Court of Parliament that their Decrees if against the Law should be as binding as Acts of Parliament How the Lords judge ministerially And though the same House in the same Session may not have Power to review again their own Judgment nor to restore again any Judgment they have reversed because they judge ministerially and not sovereignly and so bind their own Hands as well as their Inferiors whereas an Absolute Supreme Court is never at the last Period of Jurisdiction yet we see Attainders in one Parliament reversed in another and so may their Judgments be But this obiter I shall but add one proof more being full and express to the purpose to prove the House of Lords sole Jurisdiction with the King who must always be understood to give Judgment by them The Record is 1 H. 4. (r) Rot. Par. 1 H. 4. num 79. Exact Abridgment p. 392. where it is said That 3 Nov. the Commons in this Parliament shewed to the King Come les joggements du Parlement apperteignent soulement au Roy Seignieurs nient aus Communes c. That the Judgments of Parliament appertained only to the King and to the Lords and not unto the Commons Thereupon they prayed the King out of his special Grace to shew unto them the said Judgments and the cause of them that so no Record might be made in Parliament against the said Commons which are or shall be parties to any Judgment given or hereafter to be given in Parliament without their Privity Whereunto the Archbishop of Canterbury gave them this Answer by the Kings Commandment That the Commons themselves are Petitioners and Demanders and that the King (s) Et que le Roy les Seigniours de tout temps ont eues averont de droit les Juggement in Parliament en manere come mesmes les Communes soâ—t monstres and Lords from all times have had and shall have of right the Judgments in Parliaments in manner as the Commons have shewed How far the King and House of Lords have been Judges of the Priviledges of the House of Commons I shall declare in that part of this Chapter wherein I treat of that House SECT 5. Of the Assistants to the House of Lords HAving thus far treated of the Constituent Parts of the House of Lords I come now to the Assistants to this most Honourable House which were mostly the (t) Prynne's Brief Register part 1. sect 3. p. 240. The Judges and other Assistants of the House of Lords King 's Great Officers as well Clergy-men as Secular Persons who were no Lords or Barons of the Realm as namely his Treasurer
Proclamation and shall return the names of the Knights Citizens and Burgesses Return of Indentures in certain Indentures betwixt the Sheriff and those that were present at the Election whether the persons elected were present or not c. The Returns to the Writs 1 H. 5. Who were Chusers of Burgesses shew the Election to be by common assent and consent of those present as that for Lestwythiel where 32 Electors are named and that for Surry hath only four but adds omnium aliorum fidelium ibidem existentium The Indenture for Sussex is in French and saith Les Gentilles homes Communes the Gentlemen and Commons had chosen Richard Sayvile c. The Sheriff of Bristol saith Coadunatis discretioribus magis sufficientibus Burgensibus ex assensu Johannis Clive Majoris Villae praedictae aliorum plurimorum existentium eligimus c. The elected were two Burgesses of Bristol Thomas Norton and John Leycester both for Knights for the County of Bristol and Burgesses for the Villa of Bristol and in another these are called Burgenses and Mercatores The next alteration that I find is after the Statute of the (b) Cl. 23 H. 6. m. 21. dorso The Knights to be resident in the County and the Electors to have at least 40 s. a year Lands 8 H. 6. c. 7. which agrees with that of 23 H. 6. that every Knight to be chosen within the Kingdom of England to come to the Parliament shall be chosen by such as live in the County whereof every one have a free Tenement to the value of Forty Shillings per annum beyond all Reprizes and that those who are elected be abiding and resident in the said County and the Sheriff have power upon Oath to examine the Electors what yearly Estate they have and that the Sheriff incur the penalty of 100 Marks for his false return and the Knights so returned lose their Wages There are several Precepts that command that at such Elections (c) Proclamari inhiberi facias ne aliqua persona tunc ibidem armata seu modo guerrino arraiata ad electionem illam accedat Rot. Parl. 8 H. 6. m. 13. num 18. None to come in an Hostile manner to elect no person come there Armed or arrayed in Warlike manner or do nor attempt any thing that may be in disturbance of the Kings Peace or the Election as particularly is expressed in the Writs 2 E. 3. m. 31. dorso and several others to be perused in the first part of Prynne's Brief Register a p. 27. ad 28 177 214. Cl. 5 E. 2. m. 22. dorso 18 H. 6. and several other places which were prohibited that Elections thereby might be made free That it may appear that the Elections in ancient times were not made by such as we now call Freeholders of forty Shillings a Year which now is established by Statute Law I think it not amiss to insert what I find of a particular usage in Yorkshire (d) Prynne's Brevia Parliamentaria Rediviva p. 152 153 154. Atturneys of Noblemen and Ladies in Yorkshire Electors whereâ—â— it appears by the first Indentures of the Elections and Returns of Knights for the County of York that the Atturnies of the Archbishop of York and of sundry Earls Lords Nobles and some Ladies who were annual Suitors to the County Court of Yorkshire were sole Electors of the Knights as appears by the Return 13 H. 4. upon the Writ of 12 H. 4. betwixt Edm. Sandford Sheriff on the one part and Will. Holgate Attorney of Ralph Earl of Westmorland Willâ— de Kyllington Atturney of Lucy Countess of Kent Will. Hesham Atturney of Pet. Lord de Mâ—lolacu William de Burton Atturney of William Lord de Roos Rob. Evedal Atturney of Ralph Baron of Graystock William do Heston Atturney of Alex. de Metham Knight Henry de Preston Atturney of Henry de Percy Knight chuse John de Ever Knight and Robert de Plompton Knight Also 2 H. 5. The Indenture is betwixt William de Harrington Knight Sheriff of Yorkshire and Robert Maulevereâ— Atturney of Henry Archbishop of York William Fencotes Atturney of Ralph Earl of Westmorland William Archer Atturney of John Earl Marshal and so the Atturnies of Hen. le Scrop Knight Lord of Masham of Peter de Mulolacu Alexander de Metham Robert Roos of Margaret which was Wife of Henry Vavasor Knight and of Henry Percy The like are found in the Eighth and Ninth of H. 5. and the 1 2 3 5 7 H 6. in all which the Atturnies only of Nobles Barons Lords Ladies and Knights who were Suitors made the Elections of the Knights of Yorkshire in the County Court and sealed the Indenture I have a French Letter of Atturney from the Lady Ross to that purpose concerning which if God give me Life I shall give an account in my Antiquities of Yorkshire This Method ceased before 25 H. 6. at which time the Return made by Robert Vghtred Sheriff of Yorkshire hath the Names of Forty two Gentlemen most of which are of very ancient Families and such as had great Estates then and so continue to have though I doubt not but as it is the Custom now the much lesser part of those present were only inserted as Parties to the Indentures However by the Community we may understand who elected were not like the Freeholders now The next thing we are to consider in the Writs of Summons to Parliament What the Knights Citizens and Burgesses were summoned for is what the Knights Citizens and Burgesses so elected were by the Writ authorized to do The first Writ (e) Ad consulendum consentiendum pro se communitate illa hiis quae Comites Barones Proceres praedicti concorditer ordinaverint in praemissis Cl. 22. E. 1. m. 6. dorso that we find for Election of Knights of Shires expresseth their convening to be To consult and consent for themselves and the Community to those things which the Earls Barons and foresaid Nobles unanimously should ordain in the premisses and the Writ to the Sheriff of Northumberland is ad aâ—diendum faciendum quod tunc ibidem plenius injungemus to hear and do what we shall then and there fullier enjoin In the Writ 25 (f) Cl. 25 e. 1. m. 6. dorso E. 1. the King intending to confirm the great Charter and Charter of the Forrest that he might levy the eighth part of all the Goods of his Lieges for his most urgent necessity against the French convenes the Parliament before Prince Edward his Son and the Knights are to meet to receive the said Charters facturi ulterius quod per dictum Filium nostrum ibidem fuerit ordinatum to do further what should be ordained by the Prince The Writ 25 E. 1. (g) Bundel num 1. Ad faciâ—ndum quod tunc de Communi Conciliâ— ordinabitur in praemissis expresseth that the Knights Citizens and Burgesses are to do what then shall be
Entries fol. 446 447. Trin. 1 Eliz. not in the Commons House as the Statutes and Precedents in the Law-Books resolve So that he saith how the Commons are now become sole Judges of all false Returns and Elections and that perlegem consuetudinem Parliamenti against all these Acts and Precedents let Sir Edward Coke and others resolve him and the Intelligent when they are able for late and arbitrary Priviledges are of no value but ancient usage and Law of our Parliaments and solid Reason which cannot be produced to justify these late Innovations and Extravagances The Statute of 8 H. 6. Rot. Parl. 8 H. 6. num 391. Petitions from the Commons to the King and Lords about Elections to prevent Tumults Uproars and Disorders in the Elections is grounded upon a Petition from the Commons that the King by advice and assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal would seclude all but Freeholders of forty Shillings a Year Lands above all Reprizals which was more than forty Pound a Year now being the twentieth part of a Knights Fee In 18 H. 6. Rot. Parl. 18 H. 6. m. 13. num 18. it was shewed to the King and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal That Gilbert Hore Sheriff of the County of Cambridge made no Return of Knights upon the King 's Writ Whereupon the King by Advice and Assent of the Lord Spiritual and Temporal ordered a new Writ So that then there were no other but the King that had the Power to cause new Elections with Advice and Consent of the Lords and so the King issued out new Writs Anno 29 H. 6. Nicholas Stynecle Knight Richard Bevel c. and other notable Esquires Gentlemen and other Men holding Fees who may expend 40 s. per Annum beyond Reprizes chose Robert Stonham and John Stynecle notable Esquires To this is annexed a Petition to the King our Gracious and Sovereign Lord Petition of Subjects to the King about Elections signed by 140 Gentlemen and Freeholders in behalf of those against one Henry Gimber who was not of Gentile Birth chosen by the number of 70. and the Under-Sheriff countenanced him and his Party and would not suffer these 140 to be examined about their Estates and give Voice thoue he might clearly yarely expend 20 Mark without that we should have offended the Peace of Yow our most doutye Soveraign Lord and so we departed for dread of the said Inconveniences that was likely to be done of Manslaughter and what the Sheriff will return in this behalf we can have no notice For which Causes we your true humble Suggets and Liegemen in our most lowly Wise beseeching you our most douty Sovereign Lord and King these Premisses may be considered for Your most Aid and our Freedom that the said Sheriff may be by Your great Highness streightly charged to return the said Robert Stoneham c. Thus far the Petition From this memorable Petition Mr. Prynne makes many observations the principal of which are that the King himself was to redress and rectify all false and undue Returns Secondly That this is the only clear Declaration and Record he hath met with complaining against a Sheriff giving of an Oath A Sheriffs denying the Poll petitioned against and Poll to some Freeholders and denying it to others Thirdly That when legal Electors cannot be sworn or polled without breach of the Peace or Manslaughter they may justly depart and ought to make such a complaint and declaration under their hands and Seals Fourthly That Ignoble persons who are not of Gentile birth ought not to be elected Knights of Shires Whoever desires to peruse more concerning the ancient usage in Elections may peruse Mr. Prynne's Plea for the Lords from page 371. to 416. his Second Part of Brief Register p. 118 119 139 140. and several other places I shall only add what Queen Eliz. Freeholders Grand Inquest p. 60. D' Ewes's Journal fol. 393. 18 Regni said in this case That she was sorry the Commons medled with chusing and returning Knights of the Shire for Norfolk it is to be presumed the like she might have said of any other County if there had been occasion a thing impertinent for the House to deal with and only belonging to the Office and Charge of the Lord Chancellor from whom the Writs issue and are returned Having thus given a brief account of the ancient Usage I come to the modern way which according to Mr. Hackwell Memorials c. 6. p. 20. The modern Use of Regulating Elections is that a general order hath usually been made in the beginning of the Session to Authorize the Speaker to give Warrant for new Writs in case of Death of any Member or of double Returns where the Party makes his choice openly in the House during that Session as it was ordered in the beginning of the Parliament 18 and 21 Jacobi primi and where such general Order is not made Writs have issued by Warrant of the Speaker by Vertue of special Order upon motion in the House and this Warrant is to be directed to the Clerk of the Crown in Chancery by order of Parliament 13 Nov. 1601. The Committee of Privileges 24 March 21 Jacobi making their Report a question was put Whether Sir Thomas Holland and Sir John Corbet were well elected Knights for Norfolk the House were divided and it was over-ruled by the House that the No's should go forth So that now the House of Commons are the sole Judges of the validity or invalidity of Elections and I suppose the King and Lords judging the House the competentest Persons to make enquiry and being willing to be eased of the trouble of such Matters as relate only to the Members of the House of Commons have rather by connivence than by any positive Ordinance in the House of Lords dismissed this to the House of Commons against which Mr. Prynne sadly complains Plea for the Lords p. 413. saying That since the Committees of Privileges have interposed in them their Proceedings have been very irregular and illegal in respect all the Witnesses they examine touching them are unsworn and give their Testimonies without Oath upon which they ground their Vote and for the most part very partially for which cause it is usually stiled the Committee of Affection In 35 Eliz. Sir Simon D' Ewes's Journal p. 494. In Queen Elizabeth's time Application made to the Chancellor or L. Keeper Sir Edward Coke being then Speaker he was ordered to attend the Lord Keeper to move his Lordship to direct a new Writ for chusing a Burgess for Southwark instead of Richard Hutton supposed to be unduly elected and another for allowing Sir George Carew who was duly elected but not returned to be Burgess of Gamelsford in Cornwal and a third for changing the name of John Dudley returned Burgess for New Town in the County of Southampton into the name of Thomas Dudley the Christened Name being mistaken But the L. Keeper would
the King who by the same Laws hath the Power of putting in execution and suspending the execution of the Laws in many Cases or that Aristocracy or Democracy have any such mixture with the Monarchy as they can impose their Laws upon him For to suppose a mixed Monarchy consisting of Three Estates independent for their Authority upon one another and to have several shares in the Rights of Sovereignty and to say The Government of three Estates is the Government of one Monarch is perfect nonsence for when (q) Besold Synopsis Polit. Doct. l. 1. c. 6. Monarchy Aristocracy and Democracy are melted and allayed together that which resulteth can take its name from none of the simple species or kinds of Government but must have some other Appellation Whoever will consider aright of the concurrence of the two Houses in preparing Bills will find How the two Houses concur in making Laws That though the Houses be as the Causa sine qua non yet the efficient procatarctick Cause and the Authoritative Power in passing these into Laws is the King only and what the two Houses do without his Assent is but as the Counsellor at Law 's framing a Deed and the Clerks Ingrossing the Indenture of Conveyance but till the Seal be set to it and delivery made as the Act and Deed of Donor or Conveyor it is of no force and virtue neither do we call it the Act and Deed of the Counsellor or Clerk but of the Person that seals it Another Objection those Champions for the two Houses made great noise with was (r) King's Supremacy p. 84. Objection That the Mixture is in the Supremacy of Power That the Power where the Legislative is in all Three is in the very Root and Essence of it compounded and mixed of those three so that where this height of Power resideth in a mixed Subject that is in three concurrent Estates the consent and concursus of all being most free and none depending on the Will of the other that Monarchy is in the most proper sence and in the very model of it a mixed Constitution And that such is the State of the Monarchy of England the Objector thinks clear because the House of Peers are an Aristocracy and the Commons a Democracy and this mixture of Interests and Powers being in the very Legislative Power he concludes the mixture is in the Root and Supremacy of Power and not in the exercise alone In answer to which it must be considered Answer That is only in the Exercise of the Power That though the concurrence of both the Estates with the Monarch in the making and promulgation of Laws be such as our Laws describe yet it is no otherwise than in the precedent Chapters by undeniable proofs I have made it out That what participation soever the two Houses have with the King in the Legislature it is only derivative from the Crown by the King's Summons and the restriction of those Summons to do and consent It is known to be the common Assertion of (s) Panorm cap. Gravem de Sent. Excom Canonists (t) Bertol. in Lomnes Populi sect de Justitia Jure q. 2. Civilians and (u) Suarez lib. 1. de Leg. c. 8. n. 9. Schoolmen That the Legislative Power is communicable by the Princes allowance and that such a concurrence as our Kings have allowed is no Argument of Supremacy such a mixture of the three Estates hath been in other Monarchies * Besold de Juribus Magist c. 2. which every where are owned to be absolute in respect of Power For as they are summoned by the Princes single Authority and dissolved at his own pleasure they can claim no sort of Right during their Session further than to consult about and prepare Bills for the Royal Assent Therefore (w) De Imperio Summarum Potestatum circa sacra c. 8. num 11. Grotius saith Istam Legislationem quae aliis quam Summae Potestati competit nihil imminuere de jure Summae Potestatis quod in Scholis dicunt cumulative datum censeri non privative So in our Kingdom every Corporation hath Authority to make Ordinances and Constitutions within their own Liberties for the good Order and Government of the Body and the Inhabitants (x) Coke 5. part tit Cases de By-Laws Ordinances of every Parish to make By-Laws and Ordinances among themselves for their own profit where they have Custom for it and for the Publick Good where they have no Custom Surely this is a sort of Legislative Power yet thereby it cannot be inferred that they have any Co-ordinate Power with the King in the Rights of Soveraignty So that allowing the Power of the two Houses as large as can be proved by the Laws for the stretch that the Parliamentarians would make is by the Tenters they only have set up the whole latitude of the Nomothetical Power is not jointly in the two Houses for none but Strangers to our Laws can deny That the King hath sole Power to dispense with the Statutes and abate their Rigour where a mischief would otherwise insue he alone hath Power by Edicts and Proclamations to order all Affairs for which there is no order taken by certain and perpetual Laws The Legislative Power is either (y) King's Supremacy p. 88. Of Architectonical and Preceptive Power Architectonical or Preceptive The Architectonical is that which layeth Materials of Law and consisteth in two things First in determining what is just convenient or necessary Secondly in declaring and promulgating that to be actually made a Law and Enacted which upon consultation is thought to be just convenient or necessary The first shews no Jurisdiction in the Persons who have it but only an Office and Imployment to deliberate and consult But whoever hath the Second Power hath a Jurisdiction to define Authoritatively what shall be Law and this Preceptive Power is that which makes the Law sacred and inviolable and which giveth it force to oblige the Conscience Now it is evident by undeniable Testimony and Authority that the exercise of the Architectonical Power is only committed to the two Houses who have votum consultivum decisivum but it is derived from the King who hath only the Preceptive Power So that the Writers for the two Houses generally did use a Sophistical way of arguing not discovering what they could not but know the difference betwixt the King's and the two Houses Powers in the making of Laws For subordinate Agents that are but Instruments of another and work by a derived Power when they concur with the Principal and supream Agent have their causality in producing the Effect yet this doth not prove the Authority to be radically in them As in an Estate of Lands saith (z) Idem p. 91. Mr. Sherringham wherein a Man hath a perpetual Right in Fee his Right is distinguished from the King 's Right of whom he holds the King having the demean of the
Land and the other the demean of the Fee So it is in an Estate of Power and Authority If the King granteth an Estate of Power Authority and Jurisdiction in Fee-simple or in Fee-tail for term longer or shorter the King hath the demean of Power and the other the demean of Use the King hath Dominium directum the other Dominium utile which he applies to the two Houses but it must be likewise considered that this distinct Authority they have is wholly derivative and so much the more depending on the Sovereign as he can at his Pleasure totally deprive them of the Exercise of it by Prorogation or totally annihilate it by Dissolution Another Objection they made Objection The Three Estates to restrain the Excess of each other was from the Answer the King authorized a Gentleman to make to the Observer That the three Estates are constituted to the End that the Power of the one should moderate and restrain the excess of the Power in the other From which he infers That this is an Allay and mixture in the Root and essence of the Constitution To this it may be answered Answer to it That there is no such Power in the two Houses they are called to consult and to consent All they can do is that they have the opportunity of having grievances redressed because they may otherwise deny the King the assistance he desires But they have no Authority of themselves to redress them or to restrain and moderate his Excesses by Force nor can they moderate the Excesses of one another by any Act of their own singly further than the exorbitant Estate shall be willing to be moderated It is a most absurd thing to imagine that when the Law hath placed the Sovereign Power in the King it should again for a space of time during the Session of Parliament unsovereign Him and place in the two Houses the same Sovereign Trust and with a second absurdity leave in the King's Hands the summoning and dissolving the Power by which himself should be constrained and to make up all should by Authority of that Power constrain all the Heads of the People and even the Representative Body of that Power by Solemn Oath to declare that the King is not only supreme Governour but that he is only supreme Governour Besides the Arguments they sued upon this Head of a debased Monarch that was not only to admit some of his Subjects into the Participation of his Burthen but of his Soveraignty whereby they pleaded for both the Houses being joynt-Sovereigns for the time they used other Arguments singly for the House of Commons which they endeavoured to aggrandize and raise to a strange over-towring heighth above both King and Lords and they grounded all their Arguments upon the immense Power of their being the Peoples Representatives The Observer saith Objection concerning the Power of Representatives That the vertue of Representation is the great Privilege of Privileges that unalterable Basis of all Honour and Power whereby the House of Commons claims the entire Right of all the Gentry and People and that there can be nothing under Heaven next to renouncing of God which can be more perfidious and more pernicious to the People than the withdrawing from them and doth acknowledge that the Arbitrary Rule was once most safe for the World But now since most Countries have found out an Art and peaceable Order for publick Assemblies he means by Representatives whereby the People may assume its own Power and do it self Right without the disturbance of it self or injury to Princes he is very unjust that will oppose this Art and Order In answer to which it ought to be considered That the Representative Body deserves the highest Honour and Observance that can be given to the Body Represented Answer What Honour is due to Representatives of the Subjects but this Honour will depend upon two things First the quality and condition of the Body represented and Secondly on the quality of the Representative it self If therefore the Body at large were an absolute Sovereign as in Republicks the true Representative of that Body were to be observed with all Sovereign Honour and due Subjection But when the Body at large it self is but a Subject as it is in Monarchy the Honour and Authority of the Representative cannot exceed the Honour and Authority of a Subject for none can make the Image more than the Original or without Adulterating Arts appear so Therefore however abhorrent a Crime he makes it in such as concurr not in their Judgment with their Representatives that exceed their Authority and Commission yet all sober and just Persons ought to consider that the Subjects by giving Authority to some of their own Order to represent them and advise and consent for them gave them no such Power above that of Subjects yea so much above the condition of their Sovereigns that neither breach of Faith nor the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy which they never took to them or any other Duty to their King was comparable to the withdrawing from the Vote or Act of their Representators as if the Rights of the Crown and Kingdom and the Laws made by the King with the assent of the three Estates in Parliament did not so much concern the Commons of the Land but that against all these they stood solely bound to the Representatives as the only Sovereign of their Obedience I shall now offer some Reasons against this dangerous Opinion First It is to be considered Reasons against the Power of Representatives That in our Kingdom the Representors are not equally chosen as in the united Provinces and other Commonwealths but it lies in the Power of the Sovereign here to make a Town equal in number of Burgesses to a County which doth vehemently demonstrate That the first Institution and end of such Representatives was rather to minister Information of the State and Condition of that particular place and advise and assist the Sovereign and to consent with him and not to determine Sovereignly Secondly The cockering the People in that Opinion that the Soveraignty lies in Materia prima in them and by their Representatives that they may exert it is the certain way to ruin not only Monarchy but all government as was evident in the case of the Rebellious House of Commons in King Charles the First 's time who prided themselves so much with the Title of Representatives and by pretext of that and the Assistance of their Army having unyoked themselves from all Subjection to their Lawful King and disengaged themselves from their dangerous and useless Collegues the Lords as they then voted them after some while they lost their Honour and Reverence with their own Army who then would be the People and pulled them out of their House justly charging them with a design to perpetuate themselves And so the Tyrannical Supremacy was exercised by Cromwell and his Council of Officers a while
and after by himself and his mock-Representatives by Councils of State and Safety and such new Names and Powers as our Laws never heard of and all this under pretence that they Acted by the Peoples Authority and suffrage and all the sad Devastations of that Age resulted from the confiding so much in the pretended Representatives of the People Which (a) England's Universal Distraction p. 4. one some Years before the sad Catastrophe plainly foretold tho' like belief was given to him as of old to Cassandra His Words are That the so much exalting the Power of the Representatives was first to destroy the King by the Parliament and next the Parliament and Kingdom by the People Thus ignorant Politicians that build upon such Quick-sands soon live to see their Insanae Structurae ruinously fall about their Ears Thirdly Whereas the Advocates for the Representatives would gladly have possessed the People that they could rely upon none so securely and safely as upon those they had themselves chosen they being less subject to private ends and affections than any particular man such a Body being not likely to counsel or consent to any thing but what is publickly advantageous It is to be considered that it is a false Postulatum Such a Body being but an Aggregate of particulars may have as many private ends as any other number of Subjects it being well known that Communities themselves are subject to dangerous Inclinations from private Incitements and I the Representatives subject to misleading Factions and Ambitions of private Men and by coalition of Parties when they fall into designs they are most dangerous and fatally violent and tho' it may at first View seem to be repugnant that an Universality should have private ends yet seeing it is not the number of Agents but the capacity in which they act and the quality of the Actors and the coherence or incoherence of what they pursue with the publick end and weal which makes the Actions of men public or private It must needs follow That if without Authority or out of the way of Public Ordinances men pursue any thing though the whole Community concur in the pursuit yet it is all of the nature of a private Action and done to a corrupt and private end Because the Author of some Observations upon some of K. Charles the 1st Messages was reputed the great Champion of the two Houses I shall content my self with culling out some of the daringest assertions Why Reason and Law were not hearkned to by the Advocates of the Long Parliament he and some other of their Triarii used and apply such of those Answers and Reasonings as the Learned and Loyal offered then against them though they could not be heard while the Torrent bore all down the stream The hideous noise of Tumults and after of Drums Trumpets Cannons and Fire-Arms hushed and silenced all the still voice of Law and Reason But now it is to be hoped when Mens Eyes are unsealed the Mask and Vizard dropped or pulled off the fatal Consequences of such pernicious Principles throughly manifested and the loud Thunder of the Two Houses Ordinance allayed mens Spirits will be better fitted to hear them refuted Besides what I have endeavoured to answer before concerning the Authority of the Representative which they would make an Assembly in which the People in underived Majesty are by these Proxies convened to affirm an Imaginary Power supposed to be theirs originally and in such a convention to be put in execution I say besides this which in several places I have refuted That filled all their Declarations Messages and Treatises when they were contriving the setting up the Commons House Topmost to prove That they were a Body that was not easily corrupted byassed tempted or prevailed upon to Act any thing but what was the best for the Peoples advantage Therefore I think fit in many particulars to shew how such Bodies may be warped to sinister ends and especially how that House not only deceived but tyrannized over the whole Nation Private (b) Answer to Observer p. 130 131. How Passions Affections Interests and Factions may sway Representatives Quarrels and the memory of former Sufferings may work upon some discontent and envy at other mens preferment may transport others the fear of the lash and desire to secure themselves have forced some to personate a part great Offices and Honours have been a Pearl in some Mens Eyes to hinder their Fight others have been like Organ Pipes to whom the wind of popular Applause hath only given a sound others who have premeditated their Parts before their design was discovered have upon some pretences or other suppose of an unlawful Election being Monopolists Abhorrers or such like got those excluded by Vote whom they conceived to be likely to oppose their designs The bewitching Power of Oratory prevails upon many In others there is a Speechless Humour of following the Drove The Ambition and Covetousness of Representatives Can we not easily conceive several of this Body may be ambitious which would prompt them to alter the old way of bestowing Offices and collating of Honours so by disservice as well as service in Parliaments some Men have obtained Honours Offices and Estates finding it a good way to get preferment by putting the King upon necessity of granting Good Woodmen say That some have used Deer-stealing as an Introduction to a Keepers place So we have seen a Non-conformist's mouth stopped I might instance in other Professions with a good Benefice whereas before he was satisfied he could gape as wide as his Neighbours Others by more only ways slip into Preferment for Covetousness and Ambition will sail with any Wind. The Covetousness of the Members of the long Parliament by woful experience was found insatiable witness their Voting for one anothers Offices Governments satisfaction for their losses out of Delinquents Estates sharing the Kings Lands and Revenue the Bishops Deans and Chapters Lands and the Estates of the Royal Party hence together with the itch of Arbitrary rule they drew the determination of Causes out of the ordinary Courts of Justice before their Houses and Committees of them and in every County had their Sub-committees to Tyrannize over the People and fleece them Their cruelty appeared in their erecting High Courts of Justice Major Generals and other Arbitrary Courts The Cruelty of the Long Parliament where many a Loyal and brave man for serving his King against such Rebels either lost his Life or his Liberty and Estate and when they were the gentlest yet they could show hatred enough by Imprisoning upon I know not what suspicion and at leasure prosecuting such as they had a pique against The partiality of Members in such Conventions are very frequent The Partiality in shielding their friends from being questioned though their Corruptions were notorious to all the World So in the fatal Parliament of 1641. A Monopolist if a Loyal man was sure to be
Second as they found it in the Latin (o) Cl. 1. R. 2. m. 44. Records therefore before I apply those it is needful to note the Latin which as we find it 1 R. 2. was this Capto per Archiepiscopum Cantuar. Sacramento Dom. Regis Corporali de concedendo servando cum sucra confirmatione Leges consuetudines ab antiquis justis Deo devotis Regibus Angliae Progenitoribus Plebi Regni Angliae concessas praesortim leges consuetudines libertates a gloriosissimo sanctissimo Rege Edwardo Clero Populoque Regni praedicti concessas servando Deo Ecclesiae Sanctae Domini Cleroque Populo pacem concordiam integre in Deo juxta vires suas de faciendo fieri in omnibus judiciis suis aequam rectam Justitiam discretionem in misericordia veritate otiam de tenendo custodiendo justas Leges Consuetudines Ecclesiae de faciendo per ipsum Dom. Regem eas esse protegendas ad honorem Dei corroborandas quas vulgus juste rationabiliter elegerit juxta vires ejusdem Dom. Regis This is an additional Clause This is verbatim the Latin for the preceding French except in the additional Clause and the Conclusion which makes the just Laws and Customs both to relate to those of the Church and those that the Vulgar shall have justly and reasonably chosen The like we find (q) Rot. Parl. 1 H. 4. num 16 17. 1 H. 4. and in the Pontificale of the Archbishops and Bishops and it is added after the King hath King Henry the Fourth's Oath as before expressed answered to the Proposals Pronunciatis omnibus confirmat Rex se omnia servaturum Sacramento super Attari praestito coram cunctis i. e. that the King by his Oath taken upon the Altar before all present to observe these confirms them The Solemnities and Ceremonies used at the Coronation of King Richard the Second may be perused at large in Tho. (r) Hist Aug. fol. 194 195. Juravit coraem Archiepiscopo Proceribus qui ibi aderant quoniam ipsi solum ejus Juramentum audire potuerunt Walsingham and he saith he swore before the Bishops and Nobles there present for they only could hear his Oath that he would permit the Church to enjoy its Liberties and would honour it and its Ministers that he would hold right Faith and would forbid Rapines and all Iniquities in all their Degrees 2ly That he would make to be kept every where the good Laws of the Land and especially the Laws of St. Edward King and Confessor who was buried in that Church and would make all evil Laws to be abrogated 3ly That he would not be an accepter of Persons but would make right Judgment betwixt man and man that especially he (s) Praecipue misericordiam observaret sicut sibi suam indulgeat misericordiam clemens misericors Deus would observe Mercy as the Clement and Merciful God might grant Mercy to him Having thus given an account of these Coronation Oaths I come to the Objections First They (t) Prynne's Treachery and Disloyalty Answer to the Objections about the Words Quas vulgus elegerit say that the word Vulgus doth signifie the two Houses and the word elegerit is to be taken in the Future Tense so that the King is obliged to consent to such Laws as the two Houses especially the Commons do chuse It is a wonder to me how men that pretended to any reading or learning in Antiquities or in the Constitution of the Government could defend their Cause with such pitiful Reasonings especially against King Charles the First who neither had taken such an Oath nor many of his Predecessors before him The Latin Translation of two French words gave all the occasion of dispute for that which is called Communate is rendered Plebs and Vulgus and aura eslu is translated elegerit whereas were it to have been understood in the Future Tense it should have been eslira and agreeable to that in all the Authentick Records of the Exchequer the word elegerit is Englished in the Preterperfect Tense Thus much may suffice as to the word elegerit Dr. Brady's Glossary will satisfie the Curious about the import of the word it self Concerning the word Vulgus one solid (u) Freeholders Grand Inquest b. 46. What meant by Vulgus according to the Opinion of some Author saith That we may be confident that neither the Bishops Privy Council Parliament or any other whosoever they were that framed or penned this Oath ever intended in this word the Commons in Parliament much less the Lords they would never so much disparage the Members of Parliament as to disgrace them with a Title both base and false It had been enough if not too much to have called them Populus the People but Vulgus the Vulgar the rude multitude which hath the Epithete of ignobile vulgus is a word as dishonourable to the Composers of the Oath to give or for the King to use as for the Members of the Parliament to receive therefore he judgeth that by Vulgus must be meant the Common People not the Lords and Commons But then saith the same Author the doubt will be what the Common People or Vulgus out of Parliament have to do to chuse Laws In answer to which the preceding word is to be considered Consuetudines quas Vulgus elegerit the Customs which the Common People have chosen If we observe the nature of Custom Customs chosen by the Vulgar or Common People it is the Vulgus or Common People only who chuse Customs Common usage time out of mind creates a Custom and the commoner the usage is the stronger and the better is the Custom No where can so common an usage be found as among the Vulgar who are still the far greatest part of every multitude If a Custom be common through the whole Kingdom with us it is all one with the Common Law of England which is often called Common Custom so that to protect the Customs which the Vulgar chuse is to swear to protect the Common Laws of England Agreeable to this is what the learned Dr. Brady (w) Glossary p. 36. notes That upon the whole it signifies no more than that the Community had chosen that is owned submitted to and desired still to use their Old Customs which by use time out of mind they had enjoyed for the better management of Affairs and Conveniency betwixt Man and Man all the Nation over or in any particular County Hundred Town City or Burrough such long practices being the foundation of all Customs but these are to be just which intrench not upon the Government or Laws and by permission and sufferance only become Laws But the same (x) Id. p. 35. Author judiciously affirms That the Community here intended was the Community of the Bishops What meant by the Community Abbats Priors
the Command of their Armies This as well as other Reasons must needs demonstrate That if ever any two Houses of Parliament should by Arts of Insinuation as that of 1641. did That unless the King would grant they might not be dissolved without their Consents Kings never to yield what the Long Parliament were so earnest for they could not have time to settle his Throne and redress Grievances or by denying necessary Supplies force a King to grant them a Power of prolonging their own Sitting or meeting at stated times without his Writ or yielding to their Bills implicitly as the Black Parliament of 41. endeavoured and then to have the Power of nominating the Great Ministers of State and the Officers of the Militia an end would be soon put to Monarchy Therefore every one that loves their Country The Care to be had in Elections the continuance of that most excellent Frame of Government for the Subjects security as no other Country enjoys those who would avoid the sad Ravages of Civil War who would make their Prince Glorious their Country Renowned themselves and their Posterities Happy let them be careful to elect Loyal and Judicious Members neither tainted with Faction Ambition or Self-ends and if any such be elected let the Wise and Loyal when they meet in that Great Assembly watch over the Designs of such ill Members discover their Intriegues be careful not to be circumvented by their Artifices stick close to the Fundamentals of Government and then all things will be prosperous and they will have the honour of being stiled True Patriots of their Country Sir (n) 4. Instit p. 35. Edward Coke hath noted That Parliaments succeed not well in five Cases Several Cases where Parliaments succeed not well when the King is displeased with the Two Houses First when the King hath been in displeasure with his Lords or Commons therefore it was one of the Petitions of the Commons to Edw. 3. That he would require the Archbishop and all other of the Clergy to pray for his Estate for the Peace and good Government of the Land and for the continuance of the King 's Good-will towards the Commons to which the (o) Rot. Parl. 25 E. 3. num 15. 43 E. 3. num 1. 50 E. 3. num 2. King replied The same prayeth the King The like Petition he saith many times the Lords have made and further adds That the King in all his weighty affairs had used the advice of his Lords and Commons always provided that both Lords and Commons keep within the Circle of the Law and Custom of Parliament The second is when any of the great Lords are at variance among themselves as he instanceth in the third (p) Rot. Parl. 3 H. 6. num 18. When Variance among the Lords of H. 6. in the Controversy betwixt John Earl Marshal and Richard Earl of Warwick and 4 H. 6. betwixt the Duke of Gloucester and Bishop of Winchester whereby little was done in any Parliamentary Court and that little of no moment The third When no good Correspondence betwixt the Lords and Commons when there is no good Correspondence betwixt the Lords and Commons which happens when some People out of design to render the meeting of the two Houses ineffectual do project some matters whereby the Houses may clash about Privileges as was lately in Shirley's Case about the Mony-Bill from the House of Lords and many other Particulars might be instanced in therefore Sir Edward Coke saith That when it was demanded by the Lords and Commons what might be a principal Motive for them to have good success in Parliaments Sitis insuperabiles si fuertis inseparabiles it was answered They should be insuperable if inseparable Cum radix vertex Imperii in Obedientium consensu rata sunt The very root and top of Government consists in the consent of the Obedient and the Subjects Happiness is in that Harmony when it is betwixt the two Houses and among themselves but much more happy when it is likewise betwixt the Sovereign and the two Houses It is that which compleats their own and the Peoples Felicity But when the two Houses or one of them are for wresting the Sovereigns Prerogative from him as in Forty one then it is the most fatal and ill-boding sign of any other The fourth is When Disagreement in the House of Commons when there wants Unity in the House of Commons as we had not long since Experience when within those Walls from whence wholesome Counsels are expected and all things tending to the preservation of the King's Peace Crown and Dignity such Heats were amongst the Members that if one Sword that was half drawn had been wholly unsheathed it was thought a very bloody Battel had been fought The last he makes When no Preparation for the Parliament is when there is no preparation for the Parliament before it begin for which purpose the Summons of Parliament is forty Days or more before the Sitting to the end that Preparations might be had for the considering the arduous and urgent affairs of the Realm And Sir Edward saith it was an ancient custom in Parliament in the beginning thereof to appoint a select Committee to consider of the Bills in the two preceding last Parliaments that passed both Houses or either of them and such as had been preferred read or committed and to take out of them such as were most profitable for the Commonwealth To these may be added a most material one When Redress of Grievances are preferred to the Supply of the King that makes unfortunate Congresses of Parliaments viz. When the Members come up with strong Resolutions to provide Remedies for some Grievances either real or surmised and at the same time the Sovereign is in great Straights for supplies for the safety repute or necessary occasions of the Government for then as in most of the Parliaments of King Charles the First the Houses are for redress of Grievances before supply how pressing and urgent soever and do not credit the King that he will give them time to redress them after he is supplied and they from design rather than this diffidence will not suffer supply and grievances to go pari passu Hand in Hand as we may remember in those Parliaments wherein the popular Men made such Harangues that they would know whether they were Freemen or Slaves or had any thing to give before they entred upon the giving part The like we saw in King Charles the Second's Reign in some of his last Parliaments whereby all their Consultations were abortive and both the Kings had no other Expedient but Prorogation or Dissolution and disuse of Parliaments for some Years followed How much happier have we been in the last Session of the Parliament under our most Wise The happy Harmony in the last Session of Parliament June 1685. Magnanimous and Gracious King wherein no strife or contention was but who
should be forwardest to supply the necessities of the Crown to shew all Loyal Dutifulness to their Sovereign whereby a most dangerous Rebellion in both Kingdoms was the easilier crushed and which endears them to the King that there can be no danger but whatever good and wholsome Laws they shall propose for the general good of the Kingdom will find a chearful allowance by him How happy had our Forefathers been if King Charles the First had met with such considerate Parliaments who by a seasonable supply and compliance might have had without that vast effusion of Blood and Treasure all their Grievances redressed and the flourishing State of the Kingdom preserved and the Memories of a great many Noblemen and Gentlemen had been transmitted without stain to their remote Nephews But to draw towards a Conclusion of this Discourse Some not willing to hear of the Miscarriages of Parliaments think this Discourse needless Some that may not be willing to hear of the Miscarriages of some Parliaments wherein probably they were concerned may say what need is there now to bring again upon the Stage the rigorous Proceedings of the two Houses of Parliament or more properly of the leading and designing Men in the House of Commons in the Years 1640 and 1680. since we are now happily past these Rocks Quicksands and treacherous Shores All the World indeed must acknowledg we have a Royal wise Pilot Because we have a most wise King and good Parliament who knows full well to steer the Soveraignty of the Commonweal He hath weathered out high going Seas so that neither their over-whelming liquid Mountains nor the terrible Shot from the floating Castles have daunted him magnanimity unparallel'd Courage and an Experience beyond most Crowned Heads have raised him great Trophies of his Victorious toils He is served with sage Councils both private and National So that all must confess we have less cause to fear any more dangers of Hurricanes and Shipwracks But though we now enjoy Halcyon days Yet we are not secure but that in after-Ages evil Members of Parliament may be under a Sovereign enriched with Royal abilities to the heighth of our Wishes though he is blessed with a Parliament as Loyal as can be desired betwixt whom there is no other Strife but who shall out-pass the other in mutual Obligations Yet are we secure that no ill Exhalations may be gathered in after-Ages Can we expect always temperate Weather pleasing Sunshine and fruitful Showres No in small revolutions of Years we find Epidemical Diseases return excesses of Drought Rains or Frosts are often marked in our Annals even after promising Configurations of the Coelestial Bodies I write not an Almanack for a Year The Design of the Author in writing against the Exorbitances of some or Pamphlet for a time my Design is not Infandum renovare Dolorem out of any Pique but as much as in me lies to show from the by-past Irregularities and Exorbitances of some Men how Loyal good and Just Men may measure things by the Golden Standard of the Laws how mischievous Practices and Principles may be obviated how every one may see what the upshot of rebellious Principles will be how to detect and how to avoid the same kind of Rocks and Sands in after-Ages I know some Persons recovered from a valitudinary Condition Some love not to hear of their Distempers love not to hear of the Torments they have undergone nor of the Extravagances of their delirous State Yet this should not hinder but the Healthful and those that would avoid the Calenture should patiently endure to hear a Description of the Causes and Symptoms In this Discourse I have only culled out such Particulars The Author's Apology for himself as I find Judicious Authors have insisted upon against the unprecedented Proceedings of some late Houses of Commons which I think all Loyal Persons disapprove and I believe a great many as well as my self have heard many of the then sitting Members dislike when things were carried with an impetuous Torrent that it was more dangerous to speak against their proceedings or question the unlimited Power assumed by that House than it was to speak Seditious I had almost said Treasonable Words against the King Therefore I hope none of this present Honourable House of Commons who have so signalized their Loyalty in the last Session will take offence at what from such judicious Persons as I have met with I have delivered the Sentiments of My intention is no ways to lessen the Rights or necessary Privileges of that venerable Assembly which never can be unbeneficial to the King or People but when Discontent Faction and Sedition hath too spreadingly infected the Electors The continuance of that worst of Parliaments of 1641. What evil Principles taught during the Long Parliament in their disloyal Practices so long by the overgrowing of the Tares which were only suffered to thrive occasioned so much corrupt seed to be sown as in twenty years there was no wholesom grain left We saw too late how by some evil Seedsmen a fertile but dangerous Crop was shooting up apace It is not a little Labour nor small diligence will howe and weed out the Briars Thistles and destructive Shrubs and poysonous Weeds that shoot their spreading Roots so far But I hope the great Wisdom of this Loyal Parliament will find out ways and methods to prevent the danger of their thriving in a Soil worthy of better Plants than any will be set by Republican Hands CHAP. XXX Of the Kings most Honourable Privy-Council I Find by several Authors Four kinds of the King's Councils The First that there are reckoned Four Councils of the King First The Magnum Concilium consisting of the Prelates and Nobles in Parliament of which Bracton (a) Lib. 1. c. 2. may be consulted and what I have writ in the Chapter of Parliaments Secondly A Convention of the Peers of the Realm The Second Lords of Parliament yet not meeting as a Parliament which appears manifestly in the Record 25 Aug. 5 H. 7. upon an exchange made of some Lands betwixt the King and the Earl of Northumberland the King promiseth to deliver the Earl Lands to the value c. by (b) Per advice assent du Estates de son Realm de son Parliament parensi que Parliament soit devant le Feast de St. Lucy ou autrement per advice de son Grand Council autres Estates de son Realm que le Roy serra assemblez devant le dit Feast in case que le Parliament ne soit Coke 1. Instit lib. 2. c. 10. sect 164. the Advice of the Estates of his Realm of his Parliament if the Parliament be convened before the Feast of St. Lucy or otherwise by the Advice of his Great Council and other Estates of his Realm which the King shall Assemble before the said Feast in case the Parliament be not called which well
all manner of People as well Poor as Rich that for Highness nor for Riches nor for Hatred nor Estate of no manner of person or persons nor for any Deed Gift nor Promise of any person the which is made to him nor by Craft nor by Ingen he shall let the Kings Right nor none other Persons right he shall disturb let or respite contrary to the Laws of the Land nor the Kings Debts he shall put in respite where that they may goodly be levied that the Kings need he shall speed above all others that neither for gift wages nor good deed he shall layne disturb nor let the profit or reasonable advantage of the King in the advantage of any other person or of himself that he shall take of no person for to do wrong or right to delay or to deliver or to delay the People that have to do before him c. where he may know any wrong or prejudice to be done to the King he shall put and do all his power and diligence that to redress and if he may not do it that he tell it to the King or to them of the Council that may make relation to the King if he may not come to him Sir Edward Coke (z) 4. Instit p. 103. 110 111. hath commented on the Mirror to explain all the Power and particular business of the Court and further observeth that the Patent of the King to the Chief Baron the rest of the Barons Atturney General and Sollicitor are not so long as the King pleaseth but quam diu se bene gesserint which is interpreted a place for life and there is good reason being too many changes would give too many an insight into the Kings Revenue There is a Manuscript (a) Codex niger c. 1. Nulli licet statutum Scaccarii infringere vele is quavis temeritate resistere Habet enim hoc commune cum ipsa Dom. Regis Curia in qua ipse in propria persona Jura decernit quod nec Recordationi nec Sententia in eo latae liceat alicui contradicere of Gervasius Tilburiensis writ in the time of Henry the second which gives an account how it came to be called the Exchequer from a checked Covering of the Table at which the Officers of the Court sate and saith That it is lawful for none to infringe the Statutes of the Exchequer or by any rashness to resist them it having that common with the Court of the Lord the King in which he in his proper person gives Judgment that it is not lawful for any to contradict either the Record or Sentence By which it appears that this Court was distinct from the Kings Bench where the King sate in person and that by the Institution of William the Conqueror not only the great Barons of this Realm as well Ecclesiastical as Secular but also the Justice of England as President thereof by his Office were Members of this Court and so continued to do long after as the Judicious (b) Origines Jurisâ—ic fol. 50. Sir William Dugdale hath by Precedent shown Mr. Prynne hath given us two Records out of the Exchequer (c) Commun Term. Mich. 35 H. 3. Rot. 2. 34 H. 3. and Rishanger 40 H. 3. that that King in his proper person sate and gave judgments in the Court of Exchequer and gave not only Rules to be observed about the Revenue Sheriffs and Bailiffs but also concerning punishing Blasphemy defending Pupils Orphans and Widows and how the Magnates deported themselves to their Tenents and if (d) Inquirant qualiter Magnates se gerunt erga homines suoâ— si forte non possunt plenarie corrigere tunc ostendant easdem transgressiones Dom. Regi they found them transgressing that they correct them as they can and if they cannot fully correct them they show the same transgressions to the King He hath also given an account how 54 H. 3. (e) Pat. 54 H. 3. m. 22. dorso Incep 55. Rot. 3. dorso the accounts of the Sheriffs into the Exchequer were to be digested and in Michaelmass-Term the same Year how the Barons of the Exchequer were to administer the new Oath to the Mayor Elect of the City of London likewise in the same (f) Animadv fol. 55 56. Author there is a large refutation of Sir Edward Coke's Opinion that the Statute of Rutland as he calls it was a Statute made by the King Lords and Commons where it is proved against Sir Edward that it was made for the ordering of the Exchequer at Rothelan in Wales by the King and his Council and not at Rutland but I shall not enter into such Particulars There are several other Courts which have peculiar Jurisdictions by the King's Grants and Prescription as the Court of Requests abolished 17 Car. 1. The Court of Chivalry Court of Marshalsea of the Admiralty and that for redress of delays of Justice which Sir Edward Coke and others have treated of at large and fall not so necessarily for me to discourse of So I shall proceed to the Itinerant Justices and of Assizes and Gaol-delivery SECT 7. Of Itinerant Justices and Justices of Assize and Nisi Prius SOme Shadow of this we find in the time of the Conqueror when Geofrey Itinerant Justices Earl of Constance and some other Barones Regis did sit at (g) Regist Ecclesiae Eliensis fol. 24 b. Kenteford to hear and determine the Claim touching the Rights and Liberties of the Church of Ely at that time disputed before them But the settlement of the Constitution of them was not till 22 H. 2. Anno 1176. as Roger Hoveden (h) Annal. pars post p. 148 149 150. hath related when the King held his Great Council at Nottingham communi omnium Consilio divisit Regnum suum in 6 partes per quarum singulas Justiciarios Itinerantes constituit and the Twenty fifth of his Reign at his great Council at Windsor (i) Idem p. 590 591. Et unicuique partium praefecit viros sapientes ad faciendam Justitiam ad audiendum clamorem populi he divided England into four Parts and over every Part he appointed Wisemen to do Justice and hear the Complaints of the People The Form of the special Writ from the King to impower them to act and of the Writ directed to the Sheriffs to summon all such Persons as were concerned in this Service to appear before the Justices may be seen in Sir William Dugdale's Origines Juridiciales fol. 52. a.b. In which latter Writ (k) Cl. 3 H. 3. m. 13. dorso the Persons summoned to appear were Archbishops Bishops Abbats Earls Barons Knights libere tenentes and in every Village four Legales Homines Praepositum de quolibet Burgo 12 Legales Burgenses Sir Ed. Coke (l) 4. Instit p. 184. calls these Justices in Eyre and saith they had Jurisdiction in all Pleas of the Crown and of all Actions real personal and
the rest and leave all in unsecurity How can saith he Justice banish (t) MS. Speech at the end of the Parliament Anno 1559. Justices of Peace to be active Enormities when her Ministers are slothful making no account of any of the Common Causes of their Country and under the notion of being accounted quiet men they seek only ease profit and pleasure to themselves and to be sustained by other mens care and labour whereas the Horse-Master provideth for the good Government of his Horse Bits or Brakes according to the hardness or tenderness of his Mouth If continues he in the richest soil the usefullest and delightfullest Flowers The necessity of punishing evil Men. Shrubs and Fruits be planted and no care be taken to weed out what would choak and over-grow them what pleasure or benefit could be had of all ones cost and labour a crop of weeds would soon such out all the nourishment from their roots over-shadow them from the cherishing Sun and smother the curious Plants so that they would soon dye and wither Therefore is there a great need of chusing able careful and active Gardiners to howe and root out all such rank Weeds In another (u) MS. Speech second Parl. 1562. Speech after advising great care in chusing Officers as Justices of Peace c. that have the Execution of the Laws he tells the noble Assembly That sharp Laws should be made for banishing sloth and corruption A Visitation of the Justices of Peace proposed and adviseth there should be through the Kingdom Biennial or Triennial Visitations of all the Temporal Officers and Ministers that ought to see to the Execution of the Law by Commission to try the Offences of those that have not seen to the due Execution of the Laws according to the Office and charge committed to them as in Church-Visitations and that a Roll should be kept See something of this nature 2 H. 5. 8. wherein all the Justices names should be set down to every Offence he hath caused to be punished that it might appear who is diligent and that those that are negligent might be removed to their perpetual Ignominy and such pains set upon them as by Law may be Another time (w) MS. Speech Star-chamber 1568. he urgeth that it ought to be considered whether it be a greater Cruelty to execute the Penal Laws so as thereby a few shall be unwhipped and many hanged or some shall be whipped and thereby few hanged In another (x) MS. Speech second Session of Parliament 1571. I find this swasive It would be strange to make Laws to reform manners and prune away the ill branches and Members of the Commonweal and then to â—ye them in boxes and books it were better to have no Laws than them not Executed for besides other inconveniences it breeds contempt of Laws and Law-makers (y) Idem A Prince continueth he that is careful of the discharge of his great Office leaveth nothing undone meet for him to do for the Execution of the Laws making choice of Persons of most Credit and best understanding through the Kingdom to whom for the great trust he reposeth in them he giveth Authority by Commission to Execute a great part of the Law Therefore the Burthen of all Enormities Absurdities and Mischiefs that grow in the Commonwealth for the not executing of Laws must needs light upon those Persons that have Authority to execute them and if remisness be if the Prince should be driven to commit the Execution of the Laws to those who in respect of Practice and gain would see them executed with all severity what a burthen would that bring to the Realm In this manner Queen Elizabeth caused the Execution of her Laws to be recommended both to the Justice of Assize and to the Members of Parliament that at their recess they might take care to see them put in Execution As a close to this Chapter and an Introduction to the next I shall give a short account of the Laws in the Saxons time that were made by several Kings for the preservation of the Peace and of how great value the due keeping of the Peace was The Sixth Law of King Ina appoints that he that fights in the Kings (z) Cuninges hus Palace shall lose all his Goods and it shall be at the Kings pleasure whether he shall be Capitally punished or not it also ordains several Mulcts of Money for fighting in the (a) Mynster Church in an Aldermans House or the House of a (b) Gefolgylden hus Country-man And the next Law is against Theft and in the 13th against Thieves and Robbers from the number of Seven if they be 35 they are counted a (c) Klothum Troop if more an (d) Herge Army and so in the 26th Law appoints a Reward for apprehending (e) Theoffes onfeng a Thief So in the 46th Law of the Peace violated in (f) Burghbryce a Town of the Kings or a Bishops 120 s. and so proportionable in the Town of an Alderman of the Kings (g) Cyninges Thegnes Minister or any Land-holders (h) Land hebbendes Town So in the 15th Law of King Alfred 150 s. punishment is laid upon his that (i) De gefeohtum fights in the presence of an Archbishop and 100 if in the presence of a Bishop or alderman and in the next against the stealing a Mare or Cow the price and 40 s. Mulct and in the 26th against (k) Mansliht mid blothe Man-slaying in Companies to pay the price of his Head and all present 30 s. a piece and in the 35th against breaking the Peace in a Town as before fore The 38th Chapter is long That no Man assault his Enemy in his House till he hath (l) Aeâ—hon be him ribtes bidde demanded right of him which if he deny he may besiege him seven Days but not (m) Be gefeobte assault the House and if he yield he must keep him Thirty Days and then restore him to his Friends This care was taken to pre\vent Bloodshed There are many particulars besides worth observing in this as well ad the 40th Chapter (n) Be wundum against wounding I shall speak of that of King Edward hereafter The first Law of King Aethelstan is against Theft that is manifest where the (o) The of thâ—at thâ—ebbendse thing stolen is found in the Thieves Hand hand gefangen sy and so of other particulars worth reading The Third Law of King Edmund prohibits any Man-killer to come into the Prince's presence altho' his Servant till he have made satisfaction (p) Aef he on daedâ—ote ga swa Bisceop him Tace his serift him wisâ—ge for the Crime as it is appointed him by the Bishop and he makes Seven particular Laws together against Man-killing those that assault other in Towns holy places c. and the several punishments prefacing these Laws thus That to him and the Clergy
the Justices in Queen Elizabeth's time the Chancellor tells them that the Queen had levied Forces and Reason willeth and the obedience of good Subjects requireth that all things that the Prince commandeth for defence of the State should by the Subjects diligently and obediently be performed for dutys sake either not examining the cause or presuming the best cause but at that time she was pleased to signifie the cause of her doings As to the King of England's making War and Peace abroad it hath always been owned as the King 's sole Prerogative and when some Parliaments have addressed to our Kings to make War or Peace contrary to what the Soveraign judged convenient they have been advertised of their Duties yet when War is to be made in remote Countries which cannot be performed without great Expence much time and the exhausting of the Kingdoms Forces That the People may more chearfully serve their Prince and Country and that the Exchequer may not be too much diminished whereby the usual Charges of the Government may not be substracted Kings have upon good Reason proposed the Matter to their Parliaments whereby necessary Aids might be sufficiently supplied The Laws now in force concerning the Militia are That the (k) 13 Car. 2. c. 6. 14 Car. 2. c. 3. King hath the Prerogative alone to dispose of the Militia of the Nation to make War and Peace Leagues and Truces to grant Safe-Conduct without the Parliament and he may issue out Commissions of Lieutenancy impowering them to form into Regiments to lead them and employ them as well within their own as other Countries as the King shall direct to suppress Insurrections Rebellions and Invasions He hath the Command of all the Forts and places of Strength and alone to have the keeping and Command of the Magazins of Arms he alone to give Letters of Mark and Reprizal in times of War to give Safe-Conduct for Merchants to make a stop of Trades as he sees cause In the time of danger and for defence of the (l) Coke 7. 25. Realm may command all his Subjects to Arm and they are to assist him and for this the Commission of Array may be made use of and all the Courts of Officers of War in a time of War are his Prerogative and the Subjects are to serve the King within the Kingdom against Rebels and Traytors (m) Jenkins Cent. 6. Case 14.26.89 without Pay or Wages and this as it seems in any part of the Nation especially if the King go himself The Subject except in an extraordinary (n) Coke 7.8 Case is not to be forced out of the Realm unless it be to go with the Kings Person nor in any case unless upon the sudden Invasion or Assault of an Enemy to serve the King without wages and the King in time of War may take any mans (o) I e. 3. Stat. 1. 2 Eliz. c. 2. House to build a Fort or make a Bulwark upon any mans Land But the King may not rate the Nation to pay any money towards any War of his It is true in time of Peace the King cannot quarter his Military Forces without the consent of the respective Subjects nor raise money without Act of Parliament for the maintenance of any Army so that the Subject while they keep dutiful are in no danger of oppression by such a Power yet without a competent Standing Force and Guard Some Standing Forces necessary at the Kings absolute pleasure what Livy saith of the Senate (p) Timor inde Patres incessit ac si dimissus exercitus foret rursus câ—tus occultaeque conjurationes fierent Lib. 6. The Long Parliaments Claim of the Militia would be most true of all Soveraigns That if the Forces were dismissed unlawful Assemblies and covert Conspiracies would be again set on foot The longest lived mischievous Parliament that any English History can record knowing that they could not effect their designs of weakning the King without the Power of the Militia though they had a numerous Party prepared to espouse their Interest and as ready for Rebellion as they could desire yet that they might have some colour for justifying their proceedings pretended necessity of putting the Kingdom into a posture of defence against foreign Invasions which by subtile Plots they possessed the people they had Intelligence of and for fear of any violence to be offered to themselves or that the King seduced by evil Counsellors should set up Arbitrary Power so having obtained that Fatal Act of not being to be dissolved without their own consent issued out their Commissions for Levying Trayning and Exercising Forces in all Counties where they had power by no Law or colour of Law but that of pretended imminent danger wherein the King refused to grant Commissions to such as they could confide in for their aforesaid purposes All which was but colour and shew to wrest the Power out of the Kings hands To obviate such like mischievous practices for the future upon his Majestys happy Restauration it was enacted and declared The Claims of any Right of the Two Houses to the Militia totally vacated That the sole supreme Government Command and disposition of the Militia and all Forces by Sea and Land and of all places of strength c. is and by the Law of England ever was the undoubted right of his Majesty and his Royal Predecessors Kings and Queens of England and that both or either of the Houses of Parliament cannot nor ought to pretend to the same nor can or lawfully may raise or levy War offensive or defensive against his Majesty his Heirs and lawful Successors So that now that great Controversy which wasso violently disputed to the loss of so much English Blood and Treasure is I hope eternally determined never again to be revived without an horrid prosperous Rebellion and this Prerogative of the Crown being thus guarded by Law will never more be attacked while the Royal line continues which is to be hoped and wished will without interruption be prolonged while the British Soil exists CHAP. XXXVI Concerning raising of Money upon the Subject and the obligation of Subjects to supply the Soveraign AS to the raising of Money for the support of Government I have discoursed something in the Title of Property and shall here only treat of the necessity in all Government That the Soveraign be plentifully supplyed with a Revenue suitable to the charge Although Darius the Persian be reckoned by Herodotus one of the first that exacted Tribute The necessity of Tributes and Aids yet it cannot be conceived but that ever since there was a Prince who commanded large Countrys and had potent Neighbours Tribute Aid and such like provision was exacted of the people for the defraying the necessary charges of it So Tacitus (a) Nec enim quies gentium sine armis nec arma sine stipendiis nec stipendia sine tributis 4. Hist tells us That we may be