Selected quad for the lemma: kingdom_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
kingdom_n	prince_n	state_n	subject_n	1,779	5	6.3897	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A59875	A sermon preached at St. Margarets VVestminster, May 29. 1685. before the Honourable House of Commons By William Sherlock, D.D. Master of the Temple, and chaplain in ordinary to His Majesty.	Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.	1685 (1685)	Wing S3346; ESTC R220262	10,236	16

Succession but when the numbers of men increased ●●d Families were divided and sub-divided and intermixt with each ●●her when these little Independent Princes invaded their Neighbours ●●d enlarged their Dominions by force and power the right of Go●●rnment altered but the form of Government was the same still And ●●ough a Prince now governs not by a Paternal Right as Adam and ●●ah did but by the Election of the People or by the Right of Con●●est or by a Succession from ancient Kings who have been long pos●●st of the Throne the Monarchy is the same though the claim to So●●raign Power varies God's original institution of Monarchy in a Pa●●rnal Government justifies the Form whatever dispute there may be ●●out the Right of Succession And therefore we find when this orginal Title of Paternal Authority failed either by force and usurpation or for want of knowing the true Heir yet Monarchy continued and all the World was governed by Kings and knew no other Government till Greece and Rome set the example who changed the Regal Power into Aristocracies and Common-wealths And to satisfy us that God still approved of Kingly Government even after the distruction made between Paternal and Regal Authority we may observe that by a positive institution God e●ected a Monarchy but never set up a Common-wealth The Jewish Government was properly a The●cracy God was their King in a more peculiar manner than he was the King of other Nations he 〈◊〉 among them in the Tabernacle or Temple gave them a body of Laws appointed Officers under him to administer the Affairs of his Kingdom and in all emergent difficulties gave immediate Orders and Directions what to do but yet he appointed a single person to be his Vice-Roy and invested him with the Soveraign Power Thus Moses while he lived was King of Jeshurun and after him Joshua and the J●dges succeded him whom God raised up in an extraordinary manner as occasion required to fight their Battels and to rescue them out the hands of their Enemies and when there was no extraordinary Judge the High Priest was their ordinary Ruler who governed with a Soveraign Authority And when in time they grew weary of this and affected the external pomp and splendor of a Court and a visible Soveraign Prince like their Neighbour Nations though God was angry with them for rejecting his Government yet he himself chose them a King and after Saul invested David with the Regal Power and entailed it on his Family All this was done by the immediate order and appointment of God which cannot be said of any other form of Government Aristocracies and Democracies were a defection from Regal Power occasioned by the ill Government of Princes or by the giddiness and licentious humour of the people who are fond of Liberty Power and Innovations But though God by his Providence permitted such changes of Government he never by a visible Authority and Direction formed and modelled a Common-wealth as he did the Jewish Monarchy But whatever be determined as to the original of Monarchy tha● which I am at present concerned for are the advantages of it That i● Sapposing our Prince to be Wise and Vertuous there can be no ●ompetition between the Government of one and of many Sove●aign Power in one hand lies more ready for Action because it has ●ut one Will and needs not number votes nor wait the consent of ●ifferent Inclinations and Interests which many times le ts slip the ●roper-seasons of Action and defeats the best Designs A Soveraign Prince may have what advice he pleases and follow that he ●●ik●s best without delay he may have a multitude of Coun●ellors without danger of Faction while he judges for himself But 〈◊〉 popular Governments where there is no one Soveraign Will and ●eason but all have equal Authority how unequal soever their skill ●nd their honesty be when Power is thus parcelled out into several ands it is usually divided against it self too and grows weak by instine Fact●ons Though thy ●e is great safety in a multitude of Councellors when ●ere is one ●●●na●ad●● and Soveraign Wi l yet there is no great ●e●th 〈◊〉 of Agreem●●●●etw●en a multitude of petty Soveraigns there every man has in eq●a● power and every man judges his own ●eason the best or at least as ●●od as his Neighbours This is just 〈◊〉 if the same Body should be an●nated by several Souls which have 〈◊〉 of them distinct Wills and Appetites and do not always consent 〈◊〉 the same thing There is no a greater plague to humane Societies than State●ctions and it is hardly possible that a popular Government ●ould be freed from them The ambition of some the jealou●es and Emulations of others private Quarrels or private ●●terests Perfidiousness and Treachery or an affection of Popu●ity some or all of which are the Natural and almost neces●ry effects of a popular Government are the very seeds of ●●●ction and Sedition and though the major vote determines all ●t the Quarrel does not end there especially if the prevail●●g Coun●ess want success The people must be made Judges of ●hat the Senators do and the Nation is presently divided into as ●ny parties and Factions as the Senate is The Roman Com●onwealth it self though the most flourishing that we read of in a●● Story has too many examples of this witness Marius and Sylla ●●sar and Pompey There is seldom any peace and order long preserved in such Governments but when some one or a sew great me● have got the Ascendant and by their Interest and Authority give Laws to all the rest that is where there is a kind of Regal Powe● under the name and appearance of a Commonwealth As for the Publick Good I cannot but think it more secure in on● hand than in many A Soveraign prince is the Father of his Country and can reasonably have no distinct interest from the Publick for his Kingdom is his Inheritance and his Glory and power consist● in the happy and flourishing State of his people When his Kingdom is well govern'd his Subjects pleased and easie this makes him beloved at home and feared abroad The Glory is intirely his own as the Shame and Dishonous of a Misgovernment is which are very powerful passions in great Minds but lose their effect in popular Governments where the Glory and the Shame is divided among so many that it is despised by all We may expect a more impartial administration of Justice from a Soveraign Prince who is equally concerned in all his Subjects than when the power is divided among a great many who have their several Friends Relations and dependants to serve and whose Fortune does not set them above the Temptations of Bribery and Injustice There is more apparent danger of Oppression when there are so many to raise their Fortunes by the Government who have private Interests and Designes and must be paid well for their publick Service Whereas no Prince ought to think himself poor while

advantages of an Hereditary Monarchy For the Royal Family is certainly the most Noble a King who is the Son of Kings to be sure is the Son of Nobles And it is the highest and greatest Nobility of which Solomon speaks to be sure what he says must be eminently true of the most Noble Blood A King's Son especially if he descend from an Ancient race of Kings has as much the advantage of Inferiour Nobles as they have of the Gentry or the Gentry of meaner People It is Royal Blood which inspires a Princely Mind which is more Noble still the further it is removed from its Original I cannot now discourse to you concerning the Right of Succession it seems most Natural for a Son to be Heir to his Father and therefore to succeed to the Crown of which he dyed possessed for Power descends as well as an Estate as the Government of the Family was the Birth-right of the Eldest Son as his Fathers Heir But however that be if it be so great a Happiness to a Nation to have a King the Son of Nobles there is no such way to secure this as by a Succession of Kings of the same Royal Stock and Family whose Glory and Nobility increases with every Succession and gives a new Greatness and Authority to its Government But to hasten to a conclusion the proper use of this discourse consists of two parts 1. To bless God for the Mercy of this day 2. To be Loyal to our King 1. To bless God for the Mercy of this Day It would be too melancholy a Thought at this time to reflect on the sad face of things in these Kingdoms when an Excellent Prince was murdered by his own Subjects the Natural Heir of the Crown and the whole Royal Family forced into Banishment the Ancient and Loyal Nobility and Gentry under Imprisonments and Sequestrations the Church of England robbed of its Bishops and Clergy its Worship and Revenues while some mean and ignoble persons trampled upon Crowns and Mitres enriched themselves with the spoils of Church and State usurped the Royal Power but governed like Slaves But this blessed Day put and end to all these Miseries and confusions God by a wonderful Providence restored to us our King and Royal Family in Peace and Triumph without the noise and alarms of War without drawing the Sword or shedding English Blood He was driven out by Victorious Rebels at the expence of a vast Treasure and more Blood but was invited home again by a wearied and distracted People who now felt the difference between the Government of mean Usurpers and of a natural and High-born Prince And thus the Nation recovered its ancient Glory and every Subject their Just Rights and which is more valuable than all Civil Rights the free Profession and Exercise of their Religion according to the Doctrine and Worship of the Apostolick Church of England though some possibly may think its too late to glory in this now and it would be too late indeed and would lessen the Glory of this day were the most Holy Religion of the Church of England in any danger But next to having our King of the Communion of the Church of England we can desire no more than to have a King who will defend it which I am sure the Primitive Christians would have thought a great Blessing and therefore this is a joyful day still which brought back one Prince to restore the Church of England and another to protect it for far be it from me and from all Loyal Subjects to distrust those solemn and repeated assurances which our King has given us of this Matter A Prince whose Mind is as Great and Noble as his Birth who abhors all mean Arts and Equivocal Reserves and scorns either to dissemble what he believes himself or to speak what he does not think 2. As for Loyalty were it decent to conclude a discourse of Kingly Government without an Exhortation to Loyalty and Obedience it might be very well spared at this time in such a presence whose Example preaches Loyalty to the whole Nation And therefore I shall not run over all the Topicks of Obedience but only urge some few things which are proper to this argument and to this present solemnity It is a great Happiness to a Nation to have a King who is the Son of Nobles This Happiness we at this day enjoy we live under the Government of a King who has Royal Blood in his Veins and discovers a Great ●nd Princely Mind in all his Actions and this secures us of as much hap●iness as we can expect under any Government but it is not meerly the ●ise Conduct of a Prince but the governable temper of Subjects too ●hich is necessary to make a Nation happy No Government neither of ●od nor Men can make those happy who will not be governed Discon●●nts and Jealousies and Seditions turn the Court into a Camp and ex●hange the Civil Government for Military Force and Power and the ●est Prince in the VVorld can never Govern to so great advantage who is ●●rced to govern by the Sword But when Subjects love and reverence ●●eir King and always believe well of him when they obey his Laws and ●●mply with all reasonable Intimations of his will that is when they ●ay be governed like Subjects not like Slaves then a King has a fair oc●●sion to exercise all the Princely Vertues and peaceful arts of govern●ent to make his Reign prosperous and his Subjects happy I know no Prince in any age under whom an Obedient and Govern●●le People might have lived more happily than our late Martyred So●●reign and yet what miseries and confusions did a Factious and Tur●●lent Zeal create which ended in as doleful a Tragedy as ever the Sun ●●w and when we remember th●se times consider how little a Nation ●ins by Seditions Rebellions unless men love P●●●ession for Rebellions ●●ke there can be no great temptaion in it tho●●●● it were no sin Nay we may observe that as an ungovernable temper will disturb ●●e best and Wisest Governments so Loyalty and Obedience is a powerful Obligation on Princes to rule well for Princes must value Obedience and Subjection as they do their Crowns To this we owe the present security and Protection of the Church of England for if there were nothing else to be liked in it yet a generous Prince cannot but like and reward its Loyalty and it would seem very harsh for any Prince to desire that Religion should be turned out of the Church which secures him in a quiet possession of his Throne And therefore to conclude I would desire you to observe that it is a Church of England Loyalty I perswade you to This our King approves commends relies on as a tried and experienced Loyalty which has suffered with its Prince but never yet rebelled against him a Loyalty upon firm and steady Principles and without reserve And therefore to keep us true to our Prince we must be true to our Church and to our Religion It is no Act of Loyalty to accomodate or complement away our Religion and its legal Securities for if we change our Religion we must change the Principles of our Loyalty too and I am sure the King and the Crown will gain nothing by that for there is no such lasting and immoveable Loyalty as that of the Church of England I deny not but some who are Papists in some Junctures of Affairs may and have been very Loyal but I am sure the Popish Religion is not the English man may be Loyal but not the Papist and yet there can be no security of those mens Loyalty whose Religion in any case teaches them to rebel God grant the whole Nation may follow the Example of his Honourable Senate to be Loyal to their Prince Zealous for the Service of the Crown and true to the Religion of the Church of England as dearer i● them than their Lives To God the Father God the Son and God the Holy Ghost three Persons and one Eternal God be Honour Glory and Power now and ever Amen FINIS