Subjection is refused two ways either by disobedience and acting contrary to the Laws and Edicts of the Higher Powers or else by using Strength and making a violent Opposition against them with armed Force Sect. 5. 1. We may resist and oppose our selves to the Higher Powers by disobedience and counteracting the Laws and Edicts thereof when we unwarrantably refuse Obedience to the Laws of the Higher Powers we break out of the Rank of Subjects and resist the Higher Powers for they that will not be commanded by the Higher Powers are not subject to them and when this is circumstanced with Stubborns the Disobedience is resolute and unreclaimable 't is not only Contempt but Defiance to Authority and they which resist the proper Effect of the Supreme Authority its Laws and Edicts resist the Supreme Authority it self And therefore they sin hainously against God who are not willingly obedient to the lawful Commands of the Higher Powers but counteract them in a Deportment contrary to them because herein they violate and disannul the Commission of God himself The Higher Powers have a Right granted to them from God himself to enact and impose Laws upon us if we therefore refuse Obedience to their Laws we usurp a Superior Authority to that of God himself for we take upon us to Cancel God's Grant to them and herein are Fighters against God as well as Resisters of the Powers which are of of God a Matter well deserving serious consideration Sect. 6. 2. We may resist and oppose our selves to the Higher Powers by force and violence when Subjects contend with Higher Powers by force either defend themselves against them with armed Power or else seek to depose them or to compel them to do though it be what they apprehend they ought to do this being a kind of judiciary act and which carries a vindicative Power with it 't is the most aggravated Resistance that can be made against the Higher Powers and the Resistance here especially condemned by the Apostle in my Text and that against which I shall chiefly direct my Discourse Sect. 7. 2. What the Apostle designs by Damnation 't is evident that by Damnation the Apostle intends some thing Minatory and Penal but what particular kind of punishment the Word immediately denoteth in this place is questioned by some learned Men 't is certain the Original Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sometimes signifieth in the Scriptures a present temporal Punishment from Man and sometimes a future eternal Punishment from God For my part I think with many others both sorts of Punishments are here intended because the Apostles Arguments against Resistance are taken from Considerations which look both ways Ye must needs be subject saith he v. 5. not only for Wrath but also for Conscience sake that is not only for fear of punishment from the Higher Powers but also lest by offending God by who 's Authority the Higher Powers are set over you Conscience accuse you which binds to a Condemnation to eternal Death 'T is probable that the way of Rebellion will bring those that are in it to a Gibbet but 't is certain that without Repentance 't will bring them to Hell if they escape a shameful Death from the Higher Powers on Earth they shall not escape the Punishment of eternal Death from the God of Heaven that this is the Intendment of the Apostle seems evident to me For the Apostle having lain down this as a Fundamental Article of the Christian Faith That there is no Power but of God And from that Consideration strictly charged it as an indispensable Obligation upon every Soul to be subject thereunto which cannot be resisted without resisting the Ordinance of God himself he plainly enforceth this Duty with this threatning as the Sanction upon which it was established They that resist shall receive to themselves damnation Now as the Threatnings of which the Mosaical Precepts were established did primarily respect corporeal and temporal Evils so the Threatnings on which the Christian Precepts are established do primarily respect spiritual and eternal Evils And the Apostle elsewhere expresly affirms That wheâ— Vengeance shall be taken on such as obey not the Gospel they shall be punished with everlasting Dâ—struction 2 Thes 1.8 9. By Damnation therefore in the Text we are to understand primarily a Condemnation to eternal Torments in Hell Fire but not exclusively of a Condemnation to those corporeal and temporal Punishments to which Rebels are expose by the Higher Powers Sect. 8. 3. The last thing to be expounded is what 't is for those that resist to receiâ—â— to themselves Damnation the Original Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is variously translated sometiâ—â—â— 't is rendred acquirunt they procure to themselves Damnation this is the great Purchaâ—â—â— Rebels make the Wages they contend and fight for by resisting the Higher Powers is 〈◊〉 bring themselves into a State of Damnation and to make Hell sure to themselves othâ—â—â— render it by accipient they shall receive as our translation hath it that is as Men receâ—â— a painful an intollerable Burden to which punishment is frequently compared 2 Kings 9. â— Isa 23.1 When Subjects resist the Higher Powers they design to free and ease themselâ—â—â— of conceited Burthens and Grievances but the final issue and event of their Resistance 〈◊〉 Submission to an irresistible and insupportable load of Guilt and Misery and this they â—â—ceive to themselves as their proper Portion and Fruit of their own Doings for when they are utterly destroyed they reap nothing but what they have sown nothing is poured upon them but their own wickedness Jer. 14.16 and all the World hath cause to say that they have destroyed themselves and as Solomon speaks by provoking the Higher Powers to Wrath they sinn'd against their own Souls Prov. 20.2 became Executioners to themselves Having thus expounded the Scope and Intent of my Text I shall discourse two Things from it whereof the one is manifestly implied and the other plainly expressed 1. That Subjects must not resist the Higher Powers 2. That they which resist the Higher Powers bring themselves under the Guilt of eternal Damnation Sect. 9. 1. That Subjects must not no Subjects whatsoever may resist the Higher Powers let them be the worst that can be 'T is past all doubt That one Subject may resist the unjust force of another and Sovereign Princes and States may likewise resist the unjust Force Encroachments or Usurpations of other Sovereign Princes and States and the Subjects of one Sovereign Prince and State may in some cases resist the Sovereign Powers of another Kingdom and State but no Subjects of what Quality soever they are or whatever their Provocations be may warrantably resist with armed Force the Higher Powers that are over them whether considered as supreme or commissionated by them and subordinated to them Sect. 10. All the lawful Supreme and Sovereign Powers in the World are God's Officers and although the Specification of the Government and the manner
this Preamble At the Request of the Commonalty by their Petition made before the King in his Parliament c. so again in 9 Edw. 3. 'T is thus prefaced Whereas the Knights Citizens and Burgesses desired our Sovereign Lord the King in his Parliament by their Petition and many of the Statutes are penned in this Imperial Stile The King Commands The King wills Our Lord the King hath established Our Lord the King hath ordained And of his special grace hath granted c. See 3 Edw. 1. and 6 Edw. 1. and 25. Edw. 3. Statute of Marleburdg 52 Hen. 1. and Statute of Quo Warranto A sufficient Evidence That all our Laws owe their Being to the King's Authority only Sect. 99. 2. All the judicial Courts of England are the King's Courts and derive all their Authority originally from him and are obliged to refer the Exercise of their respective Jurisdictions finally for the Preservation of his Person Crown and Dignity and consequently the High Court of Parliament is the King's Court too and depends on him for that Authority which is there exercised And 't is well observed by my Lord Coke That the King is Principium Caput Finis Parliamenti and answerably in the Parliament writ the King calls it Quoddam Parliamentum nostrum Thereby signifying a Subordination of the Estates convented in Parliament under him sitting there in his Royal Political capacity And consequently the Acts of the Two Houses of Parliament without an impress of Royal Authority are nothing worth to the Purposes of Government 'T is no Argument that the Two Houses of Parliament have a Co-ordination with him in his legislative Authority because he hath restrained himself from the Exercise and Use of it without their Request and Consent for it is no more than a Conditio sine qua non which hath only the Force of a Negative without the Concurrence of which the principal Efficient obtains not its Effect Sect. 100. 3. The Measures or Degrees of all Civil Authority and Power are to be taken either from the express Laws of any State or the immemorial Customs and Prescriptions thereof from a long Possession or from the Oaths the Subjects swear to their Princes This is acknowledged by the Author who pleads for a Co-ordination of the Houses of Parliament with the King in the Legislative Authority of the Kingdom as a proper Rule by which to judge where the Legislative Power of a Nation is lodged and this being impartially attended will evidently discover That the Legislative Power is in the King only For 1. If we consider what the Laws determine we shall find that they ascribe it wholly to the King See to this purpose the afore-quoted Preface to a Statute in 24. Hen. 8. where 't is thus said For by divers Old Authentick Histories and Chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this Realm of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the World governed by our Supreme Head and King having the Dignity and Royal Estate of the Imperial Crown of the Same unto whom a Body Politick compact of all sorts and degrees of People divided in Terms and by Names of Spiritualty and Temporalty have been bounden and ought to bear next to God natural and humble Obedience he being also in Statute and furnished by the Goodness and Sufferance of Almighty God not of the People with Plenary whole and entire Power Preheminence Authority Prerogative and Jurisdiction to render and yield Justice and final determination in all Causes Matters and Debates Likewise in the Statute of the 35 of Eliz. this Submission after Non-conformity to divine Service is to be made openly in some Church I do acknowledge and testify in my Conscience that no other Person hath or ought to have any Power or Authority over His Majesty Which Statute was declared to be in full force in the 16 of Ch. 2. 2. This Authority and Preheminence as the former Statute mentioned implies is of immemorial Custom and Prescription and was so far as I can discover never questioned in any Parliamentary Convention of the States till 1642. and then by the Two lower States only too and then the Co ordination in the Legislative Power was asserted to warrant and justify one of the most unreasonable and barbarous Rebellions that ever was in this Kingdom 'T is declared by the Statute of 16 Rich. 2. That the Crown of England hath been so free at all times that it hath been in no earthly Subjection but immediately subject to God in all things touching the Regality of the same Crown and to none other and if to none other then not to the Two Houses of Parliament and in 1 Jam. 1. The High Court of Parliament wherein as they speak the whole Kingdom in Person or Representative was present i. e. all Estates and Degrees call themselves his Majesty's Loyal and Faithful Subjects and declare his Majesty to be their only Liege Lord and Sovereign and agnize their constant Faith Obedience and Loyalty to his Majesty and Royal Progeny And I will be so bold as to challenge this Author to shew from any Parliamentary Record that ever the Two Houses claimed or pretended to a Co-ordination with the King in the Legislative Power till the time above mentioned 3. What can be more evident for the Determination of this matter than the Oath of Supremacy by which every Subject is obliged to testify and declare in his Conscience that the Kings Highness is the only Supreme Governour of this Realm and of all other His Highnesses Dominions and Countries as well in all Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Things or Causes as Temperal as He is Supreme He hath no Superior and as He is only Supreme He can have no equal they that wrest the Supremacy of the King's Government to import only the executive part of Government manifestly subvert the primary Design of the Oath which was to restrain and preserve the King's Subjects from a Submission to the usurped legislative and juridical Authority of the Bishop of Rome So that if the Bishop of Rome pretended to both parts of Government as 't is certain he did and still doth then the Oath directly intends an opposition to both and consequently ascribes the only Supremacy appropriately to the King both respectively to the Legislative and Executive part of the Government Sect. 101. 4. Suppose contrary to all this plain evidence that the legislative Power is lodged between the King and Two Houses of Parliament how will this prove a Superior Authority in them above that in the King Par in Parem non habet potestatem An Equal is no Superior Indeed according to our Authors affirmation here are Two to One which is very great odds if he intended to press to his Service that Maxim Major pars obtinet rationem totius the major part of the Legislators virtually are the whole For this will at the Pleasure of the Two Houses render the Concurrence of the King
THE Church of England's DOCTRINE OF Non-Resistance JUSTIFIED and VINDICATED as truly Rational and Christian AND THE Damnable Nature OF Rebellious Resistance REPRESENTED By LEWES SHARP Rector of Morton-Hampstead in Devon Take this for a general Rule That the immortal Policy of a State cannot admit of any Law of Priviledge whatsoever but in some particular or other the same is necessarily broken Sir Walt. Rawleigh LONDON Printed and are to be sold by Randal Taylor near Stationers-Hall MDCXCI FOR Subjects to bear Arms against their Kings Offensive or Defensive upon any Pretence whatsoever is at the least to resist the Powers which are ordained of God And though they do not invade but only resist St. Paul tells them They shall receive to themselves Damnation and the same Constitution and Canon requires all Arch-bishops Bishops and all other inferiour Priests and Ministers that they preach teach and exhort their People to obey honor and serve their King and that they presume not to speak of His Majesty's Power in any other Way than in this Canon is expressed Which Canon the Church ordained and decreed That every Parson Vicar Curate or Preacher upon some one Sunday in every quarter of the Year at Morning Prayer shall in the Place where he serves treatably and audibly read Const Canon Eccles made in 16 Ch. 1. 1640. Can. 1. To their most Excellent MAJESTIES Dread Sovereigns ALthough the greatest Princes with their dependant Governments and Interests are exposed to change yet Truth is not This stands on such a firm Basis that that which was once Truth whether in Rome Geneva or England is still so and will be so for ever And therefore how propitious and indulgent soever the publick Revolution of Affairs may prove to the corrupt Lusts and Interests of Men seditiously minded the Truth will always be their Adversary and bid defiance to them and such is the mighty and irresistible force thereof that it will eventually conquer and triumph over all their Sophistical reasonings and enthrone it self in their Judgments and Consciences for Conversion or Confusion That Catholick Doctrine which is asserted and contended for in these Papers hath been is and will be for a Crown of rejoycing to the Church of England whose Religion being constituted of a stedfast Allegiance to her Princes as well as a constant Devotion to her God it cannot be disclaimed and renounced without a plain Apostacy from her Communion which is matter of abhorrence to all good Christians and yet such is the boldness I had almost said Impudence of some bigotted pirking Fanaticks that for many Months together they have attempted with great diligence to ridicule and expose it to scorn and contempt and one of them having mounted and settled himself in the Seat of the Scornful made it part of his Morning Exercise to insinuate amongst other sediticus Things That the Preaching thereof is one of those national Sins we are to repent of in expectation of national Mercies because a Doctrine designed to enslave the Nation Slavery with them being an equivalent to a restraint from the Liberty of an armed Resistance of their Prince when they shall judge it necessary and themselves well prepared for it Indeed another of them for part of his Morning Exercise assumes the Confidence to publish to the World That they are misrepresented when reported as Enemies to Monarchy because they have given assurance by Oath of their Allegiance to it but if the one be fit to be an Interpreter to the other as no doubt but he is they being of the same Confederacy and bound up in the same bundle together their Allegiance is only during pleasure which they will term so long as your Majesties Behaviours and Administrations are such as they should be that is such as they shall well like and approve of The naked Truth is this their Friendship and Fidelity to your Majesties Persons and Goverments is only founded on what they apprehend to be beneficence to their private Opinions and consequent Affections and Interests for the Proof of which their Deportments under the late Administrations of publick Affairs is an evidence even to a Demonstration their factious Designs and Practices being the sole Standards and Measures of what they repute good and evil all publick Administrations are Objects of their election or reprobation agreeably to that subserviency or contrariety they bear to them So that if you serve them they will serve you but if you oppose and suppress them they will oppose and suppress you if they can Wherefore if your Majesties will be secured from their rebellious Insurrections against your Government you must let them do always that which is right in their own eyes and never displease them Abrogate the Act of Vniformity and the Tests Renounce Supremacy in Causes Ecclesiastical and extirpate Prelacy as well as Popery the continuation of all which with them are national Sins raise up and set on foot the solemn League and Covenant 〈…〉 and bring the Episcopal Clergy to such a Temper that they may pass for Men tollerable in the Church and if no body anger them they will be very quiet But Your Majesties must remember that they are Abhorrors of the Doctrine of Non-Resistance as well as of the Act of Vniformity the Sacramental Test Episcopacy Liturgy and Supremacy in Ecclesiastical Causes and therefore must keep your selves in the posture of Gladiators for if the publick Administrations chance to be oppressive in their Apprehensions and Judgments to their natural civil or spiritual Rights and Priviledges with which they are more richly stored than their Neighbours they will be your Subjects no longer than they are strong enough to be your Masters and the Deposition of your Majesties in order to the Exaltation of their own Discipline which they will call the Scepter of Jesus Christ shall be reputed a Mercy as considerable as a Fifth of November's Deliverance It can be no matter of wonder to your Majesties that those Men who will still have this lain down for a Principle That in all the Disputes between Power and Liberty Power must be proved but Liberty proves it self the one being founded only on positive Law and the other upon the Law of Nature that they caution your Subjects against examining the Matter of Regal Power by the Scriptures for if we are resolved to stick to them as the Rules of our belief and practice in this case we shall find the Power of Kings founded on another Bottom and Constitution than that these Men have invented and commended to the World for the Scriptures do assure us That not only those who reigned over God's own peculiar People did Reign immediately from and by him Acts 7.35 Numb 27.16 18. Judg. 2.16 1 Sam. 10.1 Prov. 8.15 but also that all other Kings are as truly and certainly of his Ordination and Constitution as they were and owe their Authority and Kingdoms immediately to him and not to their Subjects Jer. 27.5 6 7. Isa
as it was an horrible wickedness in Saul so a great Temptation I mean of an apt tendency to provoke David to defend himself by armed Force He might have pretended that Saul had violated all the Bonds of Reason and Religion He had not only murthered great numbers of his innocent common Subjects but also of the Lord's Priests as if he designed an extirpation of God's public Worship and that he had not only Self-preservation to engage him to a Resistance but also that the common Rights of all the Kingdom challenged his Protection Sect. 30. This was really David's case and yet when God put Saul once and again under the Power of David's Hands all the Use that he made of it was to convince Saul that he was his Faithful and Loyal Subject and though he had suffered many and great Injuries causlesly from him yet no provocation should induce him to do his Sovereign any harm Indeed David's Servants and Followers were forward enough to perswade him to dispatch him out of the way as a Fact that would make way for the accomplishment of God's gracious Promise to David and the whole Kingdom But David abhors the Motion and crys out God forbid that I should do this thing to my Master the Lord 's anointed to stretch forth mine hand against him And the Reason which restrain'd him was founded on this Fundamental Law of Sovereignty That 't is not to be resisted or controuled by armed Force Seeing he is saith he the Lord 's anointed 1 Sam. 24.4 5 6. c. And so when Abishai would have smote Saul he forbad it for the same Reason 1 Sam. 26.8 9. Abishai said to David when they found Saul sleeping within a Trench God hath delivered thine Enemy into thy hand this day now therefore let me smite him I pray thee with the Spear even to the Earth at once I will not smite him the second time and David said to Abishai destroy him not for who can stretch forth his hand against the Lord's anointed and be innocent or guiltless q.d. He is our King and hath from the Lord a Noli me tangere on him and the Hand of Violence cannot be laid on without Sin and a fearful Expectation of divine Vengeance Which Words did not proceed from cowardly Fears or ignorant Scrupolity but from Conscience of Obedience to God and clear Motives of Duty to the King For David was a Man of invincible Courage and being a Prophet could not but be well instructed in his Duty and 't is said of him that he was not only wiser than his Enemies but also wiser than all his Teachers Psal 119.98 99. and wiser than all the Servants of Saul 1 Sam. 18.30 And 't is highly probable that he Penn'd about the same time the 54th and 57th Psalm as the Titles of them intimate and consequently that he was directed in what he did by the special Conduct of God's Holy Spirit and well understood both his Duty and Interest and if you consult the 23d and 24th Verses of this Chapter you shall find that he made very comfortable Conclusions from his Loyal Deportment in the Case The Lord said he render to every Man his Righteousness and his Faithfulness for the Lord delivered thee into mine hand to day but I would not stretch forth mine hand against the Lord's anointed and behold as thy life was much set by this day in mine eyes so let my life be much set by in the Eyes of the Lord and let him deliver me out of all Tribulation And his commanding Death to be executed on the Amalckite which slew Saul though Saul was mortally wounded before and 't was done at his own request to save him from further Torture and Disgrace and to preserve the Regalia is a further Evidence that David thought it an unlawful thing to assault his King with armed Force and his question to the Amalekite manifestly implies it How wast thou not afraid to stretch forth thine hand to destroy the Lord's anointed 2 Sam. 1.14 15. Sect. 31. But perhaps you may think That the very Ceremony of Anointing being done by God's special Command was that which bound up David's Hands and priviledg'd Saul from violent Resistance and Coercion because this is every where mentioned as the moving Cause of David's restraint from defensive and offensive Resistance 'T is manifest That the Priests as well as Saul were Anointed by God's Command and yet that did not exempt from being accountable for their Actions and free them from the Danger of coercive Force and Punishment It was not therefore barely the Ceremony of Anointing but the Sovereign Authority thereby signified which priviledg'd him from Resistance His Anointing was no addition to his Power but only signified God's Designation Constitution and Approbation of his Power 'T was the Nature of his Regal Dignity and Power and not the manner of collating or conferring it which exempted from coercion and correction 'T is the Essence and not the Ceremonies of Things which constitutes and denominates them For Ceremonies are things extrinsecal both to Being and Operation And although Saul and David who were the first of their respective Families that were invested with Regal Dignity were anointed yet such as succeeded by Inheritance to the Kingdom as Jehosaphat Hezekiah Josiah were not anointed and yet had as much Authority as their Predecessors and as great Priviledges Sect. 32. Those Arguments which are ordinarily drawn from the Armed Men which were with David and over which he was Captain 1 Sam. 22.2 and Ch. 23.13 which are called Helpers of the War 2 Chr. 12.1 And from his residing at Keilah a place fit to be garrison'd 1 Sam. 23.7 8 9 10 11. to prove that 't was lawful for David to resist Saul with armed Force are nothing to the purpose for David being Son-in-Law to a King expectant of the Crown in which he was like to meet with Opposition subject to private Assaults and needing good Intelligence to prevent a Surprise from Saul and his public Enemies 't was highly expedient that he should have a considerable Retinue about him to be as a Life-guard to him and to be in a readiness to serve him whensoever God by his Providence should call him to succeed in the Throne neither doth the Peoples Rescue of Jonathan from the Death his Father threatned to inflict upon him 1 Sam. 14.44 45. in the the least discover any hostile Violence offer'd to the King much less that they might lawfully assault him with armed Force Their act was an act of Mediation and not of Coercion And a learned Man observes that the Orginal Word translated they rescued him signifies they redeemed him That is Jonathan's Life by Saul's Vow being forfeited to God the People by a general Consent substituted an offering to God for the Vow according to the Law in such a Case Lev. 27.2 and so 〈◊〉 Jonathan from Death not by forcing Saul but by appeaâ—ing Goâ— This was the Case under the Jewish
Constitution which is not chargeable with weakness or wickedness because the Contrivance and Establishment of the most wise and righteous Lord of Heaven and Earth and if God doth not make the best Provision for the Rights Safety and Peace of all Men who willeth the Salvation of them all who will or can Sect. 33. And as it is evident from the instance of Saul that the Abuse of the Regal Power in male-Administration and Tyrannical Usages of the best the most innocent and serviceable Subjects is no forfeiture thereof nor warranty for the Subjects to resist with armed Force and depose their Sovereign so we shall find in the succeeding Generations after the Translation of the Regal Dignity from Saul's to David's Family that how much soever the Regal Power was abused either respectively to Civil or Religious Matters and how much soever God was provoked thereby there was no Tiberty granted or allowed for Resistance or endeavours for a Reformation of corruption in the King or his Officers I shall instance in Solomon and compare his duty with his practice You have the Kings duty described Deut. 17.16 17 18 19. He shall not multiply Horses to himself nor cause the People to return to Egypt to the end that he should multiply Horses forasinuch as the Lord hath said unto you ye shall henceforth return no more that way Neither shall he multiply Wives to himself that his Heart turn not away neither shall he greatly multiply to himself Silver and Gold And it shall be when be sitteth on the Throne of his Kingdom that he shall write him a Copy of his Law in a Book and he shall read therein all the Days of his Life that he learn to fear the Lord his God c. Let us now take a View of Solomons Practice and we shall find that he acted as if he had been under no such restraints and limitations He sent into Egypt for Horses 1 Kings 10.28 He loved strange Women together with the Daughter of Pharoah Women of the Moabites Ammonites Edomites Zidonians Hittites And he had Seven Hundred Wives Princesses and Three Hundred Concubines and his Wives turned away his Heart 1 Kings 11.1 and 2. that is after other Gods v. 4. and seven hundred Wives that were Princesses and three hundred Concubines with their respective Idol Gods could not be supported and maintained in a State of Magnificence at a cheap rate and therefore he made Silver to be in Jerusalem as Stones 1 Kings 10.27 and he had so many Vessels of Gold that their abundance made Gold to be nothing accounted of in his days v. 21. which great Treasure was probably obtained either by heavy exactions from or the great hazards of his Subjects And yet here was no suggestion that there was a justifiable occasion for his Subjects to Rebel and set up another King Indeed God threatned to rend his Kingdom from him because he had not observed the direction of the standing Law of his Kingdom but his Subjects had no Authority to controul or punish him Sect. 34. Yea you shall find that when the Jews were a Conquered People and carried away Captive into Babylon God obliged them to submit to the Sovereign Power thereof Jer. 29.7 seek the Peace of the City whither I have caused you to be carried away Captive for in the Peace thereof ye shall have Peace And in obedience to this command Mordecai discovered the Traitorous Conspiracy of Bigthana and Terish the King's Chamberlains against the King Ahasuerus Esth 2.21 22 23. compt With ch 6.2 and though they were reduced to as great an extremity as ever a People under Heaven were by a Decree obtained by Haman from Ahasuerus to destroy to kill and to cause to perish all Jews both young and old little Children and Women in one day Esth 3.13 and they were a very numerous People and could have made a considerable Defence yet Mordecai durst not think of using armed Force but resolved upon Passive Obedience unless they could obtain a Decree from the King to defend themselves The King's Decree by the Fundamental Constitution of the Medes and Persians was not reversible but must be executed Esth 8.8 Esthers Petition therefore to have the King's Letters devised by Haman to destroy the Jews reversed could not be granted Esth 8.5 but the King grants her a Decree that the Jews which were in every City might gather themselves together and stand for their Life to destroy to slay and to cause to perish all the Power of the People and Province that would assault them Esth 8.11 and being favoured with this liberty of Self-defence the Jews gathered themselves together in their Cities to lay hand on such as sought their hurt and no Man could withstand them for the Fear of them fell upon all the People Esth 9.2 and vers 16. they had rest from their Enemies and slew of their Foes seventy and five thousand And if they who were Captives of War and so well able to defend themselves from the Execution of such an inhuman bloody and undeserved a Decree to destroy them root and branch durst not defend themselves by force of Arms against Regal Power nor those thereby commissioned without liberty and allowance therefrom first granted and obtained what shall we think of those Men by what Spirit are they guided and acted who only from some particular personal or Family-grievances and some public Inconveniences and perhaps Mischiefs betake themselves to armed Force to Resist and Depose their lawful and natural Prince Sect. 35. 2. Having thus proved it utterly unlawful under the Jewish Constitution upon any pretence whatsoever to resist the Higher Powers I shall now likewise as evidently discover the unlawfulness thereof under the Christian Constitution When our Saviour first entered on his Ministerial Office the first Thing he did was to declare the Approach of a New Kingdom and the next to instruct his Disciples That this Kingdom was no Kingdom of this World for 't is said when Jesus began to preach he said Repent for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand Mat. 4.17 i. e. By an usual Hebraism an heavenly Kingdom and so called in opposition to earthly Kingdoms implying that this Kingdom which the God of Heaven was by him now setting up and which was never to be destroyed as Daniel had prophesied Ch. 2.44 Was not a Kingdom of this World was not to be founded supported and propagated by the Assumption and Exercise of any Civil temporal Power but was to be introduced and established from the Strength and Power of divine Truth and its own goodness without the help of any Civil Power or worldly Interest being altogether different in its Nature and Constitution and in its design and administration from all earthly and secular Empires Wherefore the Institution and Erection of Christ's Kingdom was no way prejudicial to the Being or Rights of any earthly Kingdom but as the Civil Governments of the World were settled before so they still
continued without any innovation or alteration hereby made Sect. 36. And answerably we find that Christ was so far from challenging to himself an Exemption from Subjection to any in Authority that upon all occasions he readily submitted to them though he were a King yet he was neither Enemy or Rival to any King in the World for his Kingdom and utterly disclaimed all temporal Jurisdictions as unbecoming his designed Kingdom thus when he fed the People by a Miracle and thereby convinced them that he was the Messiah they expected according to the Prediction in Deut. 18.18 they presuming that he was designed to be the Restorer of the Temporal Kingdom and worldly Prosperity to Israel Acts 1.6 projected to make him their King but he foreseeing it immediately withdrew himself from them to prevent their Intendment and to shew them how much he abhorred it John 6.15 and when he was requested to interpose as a Judge to decide and determine a Controversy betwixt two Brethren he protests against it as a Matter foreign to him Luke 12.13 14. and so in the Case of the Woman taken in Adultery and brought before him to be judged by him Joh. 8.3 he plainly declared by his deportment and silence that they attempted to trouble him with impertinent Matters incongruous to the Person he sustained and when the Pharisees and Herodians very ceremoniously addressed themselves to him thinking by the Art of Wheedling to Complement him to resolve an ensnaring Question saying Matt. 22.16 We know that thou art true tell us what thinkest thou Is it lawful to give Tribute unto Casar After they had shewed him their Tribute-mony and told him whose Image and Superscription it had viz. Caesars which was as evident an Argument of the Sovereignty as Legislation or the Execution thereof he makes no inquiry into the Original of Caesar's Dominion or his manner of administring it or what his Prerogatives and Rights were but peremptorily Commands them to render unto Caesar the Things that are Caesars vers 21. Be he who he will and let him govern how he will he must have what of right belongs to him Rom. 13.7 Render unto all their dues Tribute to whom Tribute Custom to whom Custom and agreeably when a Tex was demanded of him as Tribute due to Caesar indeed some very learned Men think it was Tribute-money paid for the Temple Service vide Hammond and if so I conceive it alters not the Case at all though he might have pleaded from the Dignity of his Person as the Son of God an exemption from all obligation to it yet to prevent in the Officers a scandalous Suspicion that he was disaffected to the Rights of the Authority by which it was demanded He obeyed to the Expence of a Miracle Mat. 17.24 25 26 27. and when he was arraigned and tryed for his Life in the Judgment-Hall before Pontius Pilate he did not only own his Authority but chearfully submitted to his bloody and unrighteous Sentence So that he did at no time upon any provocation whatsoever discover that he had any Commission to change the Constitution of any Civil Government whatsoever or abridge the Rights thereof or set it new Measures of Administration and unsettle it in any of its just Claims and Prerogatives Sect. 37. Indeed as soon as he entered on his Mediatory Office he had by the Donation and Deligation of God the Father an absolute Supremacy and general authoritative Power over all Powers in Heaven and Earth Mar. 11.27 Joh. 3.35 and 5.22 27. Joh. 13.3 and 17.2 though he had not the plenary Possession and Execution of it till after his Resurrection and Ascension Mat. 28.18 Phil. 2.9 10 11. Eph. 1.20 21 22. Psal 3.8 Rev. 11.15 1 Pet. 3.22 Heb. 2.5 6 7 8. Col. 2.10 and which he possesseth and exerciseth with a special respect to subserve the Protection and Salvation of his Church Eph. 1.22 and not to alter the Fundamental Constitution or to abridge and limit the Civil Rights of any Kingdom or State in the World and that special internal and proper Power which he partakes of and exerciseth directly and immediately for the gathering constituting and Government of his Church as such and which he deriveth to those who are to exercise an internal and proper governing Power over it as his commissioned Officers is meerly spiritual and all the Laws of it are enforced only with such Sanctions as are of a spiritual Consideration viz. Such Rewards and Punishments as refer to the Conscience and are apt to govern Mens Souls without laying any restraint on their Bodies or Mulcts on their Estates and therefore can no way interfere with or entrench on the Rights and Prerogatives of a Civil Government Sect. 37. And that discourse which passed betwixt the Lord Jesus and Pontius Pilate when he was arraigned and examined before him is a full evidence that his Kingdom is of a spiritual Nature and to be supported by agreeable means and not to be propugned and defended by the force of Arms you have a large Narrative of it Joh. 18.34 35 36 37. Pilate said to Jesus art thou the King of the Jews vers 33. to which question Christ doth not answer directly but yet makes such an answer as was a sufficient Ground for Pilate to infer that he was a King vers 37. Pilate therefore said to him art thou a King then to which Jesus answered thou sayest that I am a King i. e. thou concludest a right that I am a King I freely acknowledge it and have a Kingdom under my Power wherein my Subjects are to acknowledge my Sovereign Authority to obey my Laws and to depend upon me for Protection and Defence but yet the Potentates of the World had no reason to entertain any jealous Fears least he design to undermine and dissolve or to alter abridge limit or disturb any of the ancient Rights and Customs of their Dominions and Royalties for said he My Kingdom is not of this World vers 36. q.d. my Kingdom hath not such an Original and subsistence as worldly Monarchies have doth not come with Observation as he elsewhere said Luk. 17.19 hath not the Pomp and Splendor of a solemn Court attending it doth not partake of any Civil Authority and Power nor pretend to any Right to vindicate and justify it self by force of Arms but 't is altogether managed in a spiritual Way and protected with spiritual Weapons 2 Cor. 10.4 with the Armor of God and not of Man Eph. 6.11 and therefore Pilate need not fear that his pretensions to a Kingdom would endanger the quiet of the Roman State and Government And for this Christ gives Pilate a very satisfying Reason If my Kingdom saith he were of this World then would my Servants fight that I should not be delivered to the Jews but now is my Kingdom not from hence q. d. my Servants stand so well affected toward me and my Kingdom that if they did pretend a Right to the Power of the
Obedience and Sufferings Rom. 8.29 So St. Peter 1 E. c. 2.20 21. and if when we do well and suffer for it we take it patiently we do that which is acceptable to God for even hereunto are we called chosen and appointed by the Decree and Constitution of God because Christ also suffered for us leaving us an Example that we should follow his steps That is Christ by his patient Sufferings of unjust Funishment from the Higher Powers without resistance hath left us a Pattern for our Imitation And therefore though such actual sufferings be not the Portion of every Christian yet they are the Condition of his Discipleship to Christ and he cannot be worthy of his calling if he be not prevalently disposed to an imitation of Jesus Christ therein For his Kingdom is to be asserted and maintained by active and Passive Obedience and not by fighting You are not to embrace and defend Religion as a Matter of worldly Interest but as a Matter of Conscience whose advantages are purely spiritual primarily relating to our State in another World and which can subsist by vertue of its own essential strength and goodness not only without the Assistance but in Defiance to all the Contradictions and Oppositions of worldly Powers Sect. 42. 'T is true Religion being the best Thing we are capable of enjoying because the Welfare of our immortal Souls depends upon it which are to be dearer to us than all the World we are to prize it above all endearments whatsoever and consequently must be chiefly careful to preserve and defend it and to use all lawful means to that purpose and therefore may in some cases apply our selves to the Use of armed Force for Religions sake when Established by Law and made a Propriety which can only be done by a Commission derived from the Sovereign Power and never in a Way of Resistance to it A Good is only to be obtained and pursued by agreeable means because the End is virtually in the means And therefore as an Evil Tree doth not bring forth Good Fruit Mat. 7.18 So neither can sinful means produce good Ends. Hence that of the Apostle Rom. 3.8 They that say let us do evil that good may come their damnation is just Sect. 43. The Kingdom of Christ is a Kingdom within his Subjects Luke 17.21 essentially consists in Righteousness and peace and joy in the holy Ghost Rom. 14.17 which are things immediately seated in Mens Hearts and can hold a Supremacy and exercise Dominion and rule there in despight of the strongest and most malicious Enemies in the World which set themselves up in opposition thereunto Indeed the Emanations of Religion in bodily exercises are capable of restraints from external Force but as Religion is a vital Principle of Action and consists in the Resignation of our selves to God with the Expectation of Acceptance and a Reward from him cannot be oppressed or constrained from outward Force and Violence and therefore needs not the Auxiliary Power of military Forces to support and defend it self much less doth it need Assistance from Temporary Power to Assault and Invade others for its Preservation A Man may be as eminently Religious and the Power of Christ's Kingdom as highly advanced by him under the most slavish Constraints Human Nature is capable of as when he is preferred to the greatest Preheminences the whole World can Accommodate him withal Sect. 44. This is a certain Truth that external Advantages of Honour Profit Power and other Appurtenances to worldly Prosperity add of themselves nothing to the Strength and Goodness of Religion and therefore it can subsist as well without them as with them For let a Mans outward Condition be what it will he shall be as Religious as he is willing to be and shall do as much good as he is willing to do 2 Cor. 8.12 If there be first a willing Mind 't is accepted according to that a Man hath and not according to that he hath not God doth not measure the acceptability and rewardableness of a Christians Service from the outward means and opportunities thereof but from his integrity and readiness actually to perform his duty agreeably to his abilities and opportunities If therefore through the Tyrannical Persecution of Religious Exercises Christians want the external means and opportunities of Worshipping God solemnly and publickly yet if they have a preparedness of Heart thereunto and go so far as they can to express the seriousness of their veneration of God they are as well accepted with God and shall be as highly rewarded by him as if they had performed in the most compleat and solemn Manner It is then very clear and manifest that the suppression and extirpation of Religion is not within the reach of the Civil Powers they may restrain some outward expressions of it but they cannot destroy the Life and Power of it And therefore though the Persons and Properties of Christians may fare the worse because of the Persecuting Rage of the higher Powers yet their Christianity shall fare never the worse unless they themselves will Sect. 45. He then that thinks that he can love and honour God more by fighting for his Religion than by suffering for it doth not understand the Nature of Christ's Kingdom nor the peculiar Design of the Christian Religion which is to govern all Christ's Subjects by the Spiritual Powers of Truth and Goodness without the Foreign Assistance of a material Sword 2 Cor. 10.3 4 5. for though we walk in the Flesh saith the Apostle wedo not war after the Flesh for the Weapons of our Warfare are not carnal but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong Holds casting down Imaginations and every high Thing that exalteth it self against the Knowledge of God and bringing into Captivity every Thought to the Obedience of Christ He therefore professeth a good Profession of Religion who faithfully dischargeth the Duties of his proper place and when he is persecuted by the higher Powers for so doing doth not by Resistance kill others to save himself alive but patiently loseth his Life to save his Soul For herein he walketh worthy of his Calling which obligeth him to take up his Cross but not a Sword and were it lawful for him when persecuted for Religions sake by the higher Powers to defend himself with armed Force 't would not be his Religion which obliged him to suffer patiently and quietly for well-doing but his weakness not his Christian call but his natural necessity And he could not be an imitator of Christ in the Submission and Patience of his Sufferings who would avoid them by Resistance if he could when Christ would not avoid his sufferings though he might The Cup which my Father hath given me shall I not drink Jo. 18.11 Sect. 46. He that professeth to fight for Religion by resisting the higher Powers may and doth too often whet his Sword with Malice Revenge Pride Ambition Discontent or a Thousand other conceited worldly interests which
Ground and manner of his sufferings who from a Principle of self-denial took up his Cross and meerly from a Conscientious Submission to the appointment of his Father gave himself into the Hands of the higher Powers to be dealt withal as they pleased When a Man suffers no more than what he deserves and common Justice requires there is nothing of commendation or gloriation in it but if when ye do well and suffer for it ye take it patiently this is acceptable with God And this is thank-worthy if a Man for Conscience towards God endure grief suffering wrongfully 1 Pet. 2.19 20. and ch 4.15 he suffers only as a Christian who suffers wrongfully for well-doing and then follows Christ's steps in conforming to the Manner of his sufferings when his sufferings are a probation to his patience but no provocation to his revenge will not defend himself from an unjust punishment by an undutiful Resistance Sect. 55. 'T is to be considered by every Christian That Jesus Christ was sent into the World and dwelt amongst us to be the Example of our Religion as well as the Teacher of it And there is such an exact concordance betwixt his Doctrine and Practice that the latter is a Practical Demonstration of God's determinate and unchangeable Method of dispensing eternal life and glory to the Children of Men. As Christ was brought to glory so must they and no otherwise Rom. 8.29 30. for whom he God did fore-know fore-approved and fore-acknowledged for his he also did predestinate fore-appointed according to the Purport of the Gospel to be conformed to the Image of his Son that he might be the first Born amongst many Brethren Moreover whom he did predestinate them he also called and whom he called them he also justified and whom he justified them he also glorified In which Words is represented the Method Order and Degrees of God's Decrees Dispensations and Transactions for the Effecting of our Salvation according to the Terms of the Gospel and they shew the inviolable connexion betwixt God's acceptance of us as objects of his special love and our conformity unto Christ and that according to the immutable ordination of God whosoever answers the Call of the Gospel and obtains justification and glorification according to the Purport and Tenour of it he must resemble Christ in his doings and sufferings And this is likewise the express Doctrine of Christ himself Mat. 16.24 If any Man will come after me let him take up his Cross and follow me No wearing of a Crown with him but by bearing his Cross after him Luke 26.16 ought not Christ to have suffered these things and to enter so and upon such Terms into his glory And our way of enterance thereinto is the same Luke 22.29 therefore I appoint unto you a Kingdom after the same manner and upon the same Terms as my Father hath appointed unto me And is it not enough for the Disciple to be as his Master and for the Servant as his Lord Mat. 10.15 can we reasonably expect greater honours exemptions and priviledges than our Lord and Master had And may we not be well enough contented to be allowed admittance into the Kingdom of Heaven the same way with him This is the Evangelical stated way of Salvation and to a Conformity hereunto are all Christians called because Christ also suffered for them leaving them an example that they should follow his steps 1 Pet. 2.21 who when he was oppressed and afflicted opened not his Mouth when he was reviled reviled not again but was brought as a Lamb to the Slaughter and as a Sheep before her Sharers is dumb so open'd he not his Mouth Isa 53.7 Acts. 8.32 1 Pet. 21.23 and as he restrained himself from evil words as well as blows against the higher Powers so must we and however Tyrannically the higher Powers abuse their Office and Authority acknowledge with him that their Power is given them from above Joh. 19.11 and submit thereunto without Resistance as to the Appointment of God saying with him the Cup which my Father hath given me shall I not drink it Joh. 18.11 Who calleth the most harmless Christians sometimes thus to suffer for well doing from the higher Powers but never to a violent Resistance of them Sect. 56. You cannot but well know and I would also have you to consider well the Case of Shadrach Meshach Abednego and Daniel who when they were prohibited to pray to the living God and commanded to Worship dead Idols by the Heathenish Persecutors of God's Church though they utterly refused to yield an Active Obedience to their commands yet they yielded a Passive Obedience to their Sovereign Powers without repining reviling or opposing yea they prayed for them and blessed them Dan. 6.21 Which is an Argument that they did not believe that any persecutions injurious usages or oppressions from the Sovereign Powers could exempt or discharge them from subjection to them and warrant a destructive Resistance of them and though their sufferings were in their Circumstances unavoidable and they really wanted sufficient Strength to redress and help themselves against the overpowering Force of their Persecutors and Oppressors yet the manner of their submission thereunto plainly declared that they accounted themselves as appointed and called of God by a suffering Condition to bear witness to his Truth and to demonstrate to the World that suffering was better and more eligible than sining and to give a Proof that they did not believe that God did authorize and allow any of his Servants to threaten reproach revile or resist their Rulers how hardly injuriously and cruelly soever they are treated by them but requires them to reverence their Persons acknowledge their Authority and patiently to submit to their Power when 't is exercised to the utmost Evil to them Sect. 57. And this Gospel-Call to a quiet and patient Submission to the injurious infliction of punishment from the Higher Powers is was and ever will be a Vindication of the Christian Religion from the false and scandalous Imputations charged on it by its Enemies and Persecutors who do did and will reproach it as an Engine contrived and designed for the Disturbance and Subversion of Civil Empires and Dominions Both Jews and Gentiles traduced Jesus Christ as no Friend to Caesar represented his Doctrine as dangerous to the State Joh 19.12 and reputed the Gathering of Churches the Dissolution of Kingdoms or in their own Words a turning of the World upside down Acts 17.6 That is an inversion of Order a pulling down of Rulers and the setting up of Subjects in their room which Stratagem was and may be marvellously successful to bring the Christian Religion into disgrace with the Civil Powers who are ever very watchful to endeavour to their utmost to reject and suppress all those Doctrines which they suspect to be prejudicial and destructive to their Authority and Government and how can this slanderous Imputation to the Christian Religion be more effectually confuted than by
the Apostle said concerning the Difference betwixt the Condition of the Jew and of the Gentile that the Jew had the advantage and profit much every way Rom. 3.1 2. that may I say concerning the different Condition of the aforementioned sorts of Government a Political Legal limited Government hath much advantage and profit every way above that which is Despotical Absolute and Arbitrary and therefore no Man which wisheth well to his Country and sincerely desires the Safety ease and contentment either of the Sovereign or his Subjects will contribute in the least Degree any Assistance by word or deed towards the Abolition of the former and Introduction of the latter but yet supposing the Sovereign Power of the latter irresistble and the Sovereign Power of the former resistible by the Subjects thereof and it will be the most desirable because it is invested with an unappealable Authority and consequently is sufficiently provided for the Decision and Determination of all Controversies and the Preservation of the Peace of the Community which is not the Case of the other as hath been formerly observed And I am sure the Danger of Anarchy is as terrible and more than that of Tyranny Now for the confutation of the foregoing Objection let these particulars be considered Sect. 91. 1. Though a Political Prince who is obliged to regulate his Power by his known Laws made and Established with the Consent and Approbation of his Subjects may from a presumption of the uncontrollableness and irresistibility of his Power abuse his Power in Arbitrary Administrations thereof governing as if his private Will and not his public Laws were to be the Measure of his Government yet this cannot alter the Fundamental Constitution of the Government and make his Will a Law to his Subjects and therefore though they must not actively resist his Power yet they are not obliged actively to own and obey it And 't is very improbable that any Prince in the World who is well in his Wits will augment his Power by Usurpation when his Government will be as safe by a Legal Administration endeavour to obtain any End of Government by Force and against the Consent of the Subjects which is obtainable by Law and with their Consent Princes ordinarily are not so meanly skilled in the Politics but they know and consider too That he hath most Power over his Subjects who is most powerful in them And in truth all the Strong Holds in a Kingdom will have nothing of Security in them for the Sovereign when he hath dismantled this Sect. 92. 2. Though a Political as well as a Despotical Prince can do no wrong which is censurable and punishable by any Human Law for though he be obliged in Honour Equity and Conscience to Conduct himself and Administrations by the directive Power of the Law yet he is not under the corrective and coercive Power of it not only because he who can make and repeal the Law and pardon the Transgression thereof is greater than the Law and above it but also because he hath no Superiour to judge and execute any legal punishment on him yet those Commissioned by him are accountable and punishable for Illegal Administrations and cannot serve his private Will contrary to his Laws without exposing themselves to the Condemnation of evil doers And though the King may for a Time interpose an Illegal Exercise of his Power to suspend the Law and to defend and rescue then from the Coaction and Vengeance of it yet he may after due consideration of the Nature of the Thing prefer the Honour of his Government before the Protection of the Transgressors of his Law and chuse rather to justifie his Legal Will than to shew indulgence to his Passionate Humor And in case such Malefactors should escape Condign Punishment during the whole Reign of the Prince that employs them yet 't is great odds but his Successor to shew the Value he sets on his Laws his readiness to redress the Grievances of his Subjects from former Male-administrations of Government and to ingratiate himself with them as all over of Righteousness and tender of their Legal Liberties will offer them as a Sacrifice to public justice And therefore not only all honest Men but also all worldly wise Men and Men of Fortunes will upon this account take heed how they engage themselves in the Execution of the King's Will against his Laws I do not doubt but the Kings of England will consider what the Learned Bracton said that Ipse Rex non debet esse sub homine sed sub Deo sub Lege quia Lex facit Regem The King himself ought not to be under Man but under God and under the Law because the Law makes the King His meaning is not that the King derives his Authority as King from the Law for then the Principal Efficient cause of Governing Administrations would owe its being to the Instrumental Cause thereof but the true Intent of that learned Author and of Fleta too who concurs with him in that expression is this that the Law declares and publisheth to the Subject who is their rightful King and so supports and maintains him as King in their acknowledgments and by the Observation of which he distinguisheth himself from a Tyrant who Governs without a due regard had to Law And in this respect I think my Lord Coke spake not amiss when he told King James the First That the Law sate the Crown upon his Head And there is no such ready Way to keep and hold the Crown there as to keep and hold fast to that Law which sate it there Sect. 93. 3. As the Power of Sovereign Princes is from the Lord so their hearts are in his hand and he over-ruleth them to the best Purposes and will not permit them unless provoked by our sins to become illegal scourges to us 1 Per. 3.13 Who is he that will 〈…〉 if ye be followers of that which is good 'T is generally acknowledged that when the Apostles Epistle was written to the Romans that the Government of that Empire was Despotical and managed with such an Arbitrary Absoluteness that it was highly Tyrannical and yet the Apostle tells them that the Powers that be are ordained of God And forbids them resistance under the pain of condemnation And tells them that Rulers are not i. e. by their Office ought not to be a Terrour to good Works but to the Evil. And least they should say as many among us are apt to do 't is true the good should be protected countenanced and encouraged but we can have no assurance thereof from the Constitution of the Government our Rulers may make their lust a Law and what a Case shall we be in then The Apostle anticipates this Objection by assuring them That performing their duties they shall obtain the Success desired v. 3. Do that which is good and thou shalt have praise of the same For he is the Minister of God to thee
de Regno suo concessit c. The Lord the King of his Parliament from his special grace and for the Affection he hath toward the Prelates and all others of his Kingdom hath granted I appeal to all unprejudiced Men to consider if this be the Language of an accountable Trustee Sect. 106. Coke the Regicide having told his Blood-thirsty Masters That Charles Stuart for so he called his Liâ—ge Lord that King of Blessed Memory stands now that is in their High Court of Justice to give an account of his Stewardship he thus begins to diffect his charge That the Kings of England are trusted with a limited Power to govern by Law and affirms it to be one of the Fundamentals of the Law that the King is not above the Law but the Law above the King And for the Proof of it offer'd the Coronation Oath wherein the King swears to keep and observe the Laws which the People shall chuse And then endeavouring to impute to his Sacred Majesty a Violation of his Fidelity to God and his People concludes him justly condemned by the Fundamental Law of the Nation c. and no wonder of such an Inference for as he tells us Governours are but the Peoples Creatures the Work of their hands to be accomptable as their Stewards and therefore when they prevaricate and abuse their Trust to question by what Law they call them to account is High Treason with a Witness And this is the true Tendency of that Doctrine That all Power is originally from the People and the King 's executive Power a Trust from the Two Houses of Parliament because this makes them as Coke phraseth it his Liege Lords and warrants them to exercise an absolute Power over him 'T is so naturally implied saith he that if a King become a Tyrant that he shall dye for it that this is the first necessary Fundamental Law of every Kingdom which by intrinsical Rules of Government must preserve it self This is just like the Liberty of the People which proves it self whereas the Power of the King must be proved before the Subjects ought to obey it because he hath no more than he hath received from his Sovereign Lords the People which is only founded on positive Law and if he pretend to more than they have given him he usurps upon their Liberty which they have a Right to defend and preserve by force of Arms which being a new Edition of John Coke's Doctrine the Author must needs deserve exceedingly well of the Government and cannot be worthily dealt withal unless highly promoted how agreeable this is to our Legal Constitution I refer to every indifferent Judgment who will compare it with what hath been observed concerned it and shall conclude in the Words of this Author It is indeed clear from the New Testamdnt That the Christian Religion as such gives us no grounds to defend or propagate it by force It is a Doctrine of the Cross and of Faith and Patience under it and if by the Order of Divine Providence and of any Constitution of Government under which we are born we are brought under sufferings for our professing of it we may indeed retire and fly out of any such Country if we can but if that is 〈…〉 must then according to this Religion submit to those sufferings under which we may be brought considering that God will be glorified by us in so doing and that he will both support us under our Sufferings and gloriously reward us for them By Submitting to Sufferings by what follows I hope he means a Submission without Resistance though we are strong enough to make it and then the Safety of the English Government is secured though Religion be our Property and shall chance to be persecuted because by the Constitution of our Government we may not upon any pretence whatsoever take Arms against the King Sest 107. 6. Another Objection is this a King may actually and professedly endeavour to subvert the established Government and overthrow the whole Constitution and set himself to destroy if not all nor the greatest part yet at least very considerable numbers of his People and so plainly counteract the very end of his Authority and Power and will it not be lawful for his Subjects in such a Case to resist him Ans The Sky may fall and then Larks will be good cheap Princes may become Phreneticks and be uncapable of Government and them as in the Case of a Minor that is an Hereditary Prince a Prorex is to be had during the Suspension of the Exercise of his Authority and Power Or they may be so dissatisfied with the Burthensomness of the Government that they may be weary of it Abdicate and Renounce it or they may be so intoxicated and transported with wild and outragious Passions Discontents and Prejudices against their Subjects that they may disclaim the Government of them and indeed do so when instead of administring the Government in order to their Peace and Safety they turn it to their distraction and ruine will not be the Ministers of God for good but hurt to them will not support but destroy the Foundations of their Kingdoms but then with their Subjects and Kingdoms they destroy themselves too and cease to be Princes because they that disclaim the Protection of their Subjects and wilfully resolve to destroy their Dominions can have no right to govern them They can be no Rulers who will leave nothing under them to be ruled by them and then the Resistance of them will not be a Resistance of the Higher Powers but this is a meer Platonical Idea a Case put that perhaps never was nor never is like to have a real Existence in the Nature of things Let these things be considered Sect. 108. 1. Plutarch observes Inest omni populo aliquod malignum contra Imperantes There is in all sorts of People some malignity against their Governours Such is the Pride of Man's heart that he is averse to Subjection our unwillingness to be restrained from following our own Minds and Wills and to be guided and commanded by the Mind and Will of another prejudiceth us against the Ruler of us and this as Mr. Hooker tells us makes Men very attentive and favourable Hearers to suck in any Poyson that is breathed forth against the King or the Governours which are sent forth and anon it mulriplies and every valley and obscure corner is ready to eccho it back again We must therefore be very wary now we give ear to any evil Suggestions concerning the Designs or male-Administrations of the Higher Powers Defamation begets an evil Opinion of the Prince and concludes in disaffection to him and that naturally tends unto and ends in Contempts Abhorrences and Oppositions 2. It hath ever been the Practice of seditious and rebellious minded Men to bestir themselves to ingenerate in the Minds of Subjects Jealousies and Fears concerning the Councels Designs and Administrations of their Princes and to magnify
to the very utmost every miscarriage in any kind Thus when Absolom designed a Rebellion and to usurp the Crown He cast iniquity upon the King Psal 55.3 Comp. with 2 Sam. 15.3 4 foreseeing that having once taken off the Peoples Affections from the King he might easily take his Throne and Crown from him too For who will obey him whom he affects not to please nor fears to offend many will cry up a formed and protested endeavour to subvert the constituted Government when there is nothing in the Case but some disputable and doubtful point determined in prejudice to their private Sentiments or Interests or some particular illegal Fact or Facts done in favour to the Prerogative and Disadvantage of the Subjects either through mistake or partiallity without any design at all to make an alteration in the Fundamental Government much less to overthrow the whole Constitution or some semblance and appearance of an innovation which was the Case of the Reubenites Gadites and half Tribe of Manasseh when they built an Altar over against the Land of Canaan their Brethren the Children of Israel were so alarm'd with it that they presently call a Council of War and from a meer jealousy and suspicion of an evil intention they charge them with Rebellion against God and themselves and seem resolved to offer them as a Sacrifice on their own Altar Jos 22. and Mens Fears from misgrounded Jealousies do more often disturb and hurt Kingdoms than their Princes designs and endeavours to make any considerable alteration in the Government do 3. An outragious transport of Passion in a Prince which proves destructive to the Persons and Proprieties of some of his Subjects is not an habitual disclaiming or virtual renouncing of the Protection of his Subjects nor consequently is it a ground for a warrantable Resistance of him with armed Force Though Saul most inhumanly murdered Fourscore and Five Priests at once and smote Nob. the City of the Priests with the Edge of the Sword stew Men Women and Children and Sucklings and Oxen and Asses and Sheep 1 Sam. 22.18 19. yet that did not exauctorate him and expose him to be dealt withal as a common Enemy to his Subjects So though David by murdering Vriah forfeited the Favour of God yet he did not forfeit his Kingdom by it to his Subjects and put the Sword he had abused out of his own hand into theirs So when Joram King of Israel in a fit of fury sent a Messenger for the Head of that eminently holy and innocent Prophet Elisha he would not have forfeited his Crown by it though his Command had been actually executed as he really intended it should which was a Matter so circumstanced that 't is sometimes objected as an Argument to justify the Resistance with force the illegal Persecutions of the Higher Powers In Kings 2. Ch. 6.32 'T is said That while Elisha sate in his House with the Elders the King sent a Man from before him but ' ere the Messenger came to him he said to the Elders See how this Son of a Murtherer hath sent to take away my Head look when the Messenger cometh shut the door and hold him fast at the door Hence they infer that for the Preservation of our Lives from the illegal Persecution of the Higher Powers we may make an active Resistance against them and those commissioned by them but the Matter duly considered we shall find that the Premises are not of sufficient strength to support the Conclusion For 't is manifest from the Text that Elisha in this very business acted Prophetically because by an extraordinary instinct and suggestion he discerned the Messengers approaching towards him and by the same Prophetick Inspiration he discerned that Joram repented him of his rash and bloody Command so that the shutting the Door to prevent the Execution of the King's Command was to fulfil the King's Will as well as to preserve his own Life and therefore adds as a Reason why he would have them shut the Door and hold the Messenger fast at the Door for is not saith he the sound of his Masters feet behind him That is is not the King himself following him close at his heels to revoke his cruel Command and what was done by extraordinary Inspiration is to be no rule for ordinary Practice Moreover there is a vast difference betwixt the Resistance of a particular Act arising from a Princes passionate Rashness and a Resistance of a deliberate Act exercised from his Office juridically circumstanced the former may proceed from Love and Loyalty e. g. when a Subject shall interpose to withold his Princes hands from murdering himself or another or a Woman to defend and preserve her self from ravishment c. but to resist him in a particular unjust Act by such a Force and Violence as implies a nullity in his Regal Power and is inconsistent with a State of Subjection is utterly forbidden by God though Ahab murdered Naboth and took possession of his Vineyard with the highest Abuse of Justice in the World yet that was not a nullifying of his Regal Authority and could not warrant his Subjects to take Arms against him to revenge it So every illegal Sentence of Death executed on any Subject in England is a Murther committed and so would the King's slaying of an innocent Subject by his own immediate hand and yet no resistance is to be made in such a Case because God hath expresly forbid it and the publick Peace and Safety is to be preferred before the Preservation of a particular Person and the Reparation of a private Injury 4. The Being of Government in our consideration is carefully to be distinguished from the well-being thereof and the principal Ends thereof from the Subordinate or that which is of necessity required to the common good from that which is necessary for the good of particular Persons and some particular sorts of Men and likewise we are carefully to distinguish betwixt that Administration of Government which is only destructive in some particular Act or Acts from that which is in the main habituated bent and drift of it destructive to the Being and principal Ends of Government So long as the Being and principal Ends of the established Government are maintain'd and secured and the publick and common Good and Welfare regarded and promoted and the habitual main and stated design and endeavour of the Higher Powers is directed and applied for the Protection and Benefit of the Community they do not disclaim nor renounce the Government nor set themselves to overthrow the Constitution and therefore cannot be resisted without the Danger of Damnation Sect. 109. Another Objection is this Suppose a King by Bargain and Sale or from meer will and pleasure or any other means really alienate transfer deliver up and subject his Kingdom to a Stranger or any other who cannot have a successive Right to it by his desertion or abdication of the Government may he not in such a Case be
resisted Ans Although such an Act of Surrender and Alienation would be in its self null because an Act done against the common Right and Interest of the Community and in its self inauthoritative yet being a manifest Protestation that such a Prince refuseth to govern his Subjects he exauctorates himself by it for no Man can be a Governour who refuseth to govern And by alienating of his Kingdom he ipso facto dethrones and enslaves himself and being degraded to the Condition of a private Man and a resistance of him is no resistance of the Sovereign Power And although such reasoning Suppositions as are contain'd in these two last Objections suppose nothing in being but something only in possibility and are rather to be reckoned among Imaginations which Subjects may have than Actions which Princes do yet seditious-minded Men from Suppositions of possible innovating Designs and secret Leagues insinuate and impress on the Subjects Minds such suspicions of their Princes as Sect. 110. Thus I have finished what I designed for the Vindication of my Doctrine from the Objections ordinarily made against it And here I cannot but with great regret and lamentation observe to you that some among us who should preach the Doctrine of bearing the Cross patiently in case of persecution from the Higher Powers seem to endeavour to perswade Subjects to a Submission to them no longer then they are too weak for resistance I know they will take this for a Slander because they are for resistance only when the Persecution is without and against Law But I look on this as a ridiculous Evasion for the Higher Powers have no more Authority to make and execute persecuting Laws than they have to persecute without and against Laws I am sure they are under stronger Obligations to regulate their Government by the Laws of God and Nature than by the positive Laws of their Country and if the Supremacy of their Power will exempt from resistance notwithstanding their governing Administrations be a Violation of the former 't will do so too if violations of the latter also because God that restrains from resistance in the former Case doth not allow or permit it in the latter for most assuredly God is as much for the Observation of the Laws of his own making as he is for the Observation of any Laws of Mens making and will have us much more tenderly to resent a Defiance to the Authority of his Laws than a Defiance to the Authority of human Laws because of a wiser and more righteous Contrivance and more excellent and useful in order to our Safety and Happiness Sect. 111. If we must not resist the Higher Powers then we must submit to them and obey them They misunderstand the Apostle Paul saith Mr. Baxter that think by the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is meant only violent Resisters meer Disobedience may make a Man a Resister in the Apostles Sense it is Anti-subjection or breaking out of the Rank of Subjects which the Text forbids and he that unwarrantably disobeyeth may do that though he forcibly resist not And in truth that Supremacy of Power which God hath ordained to be inherent in some above others will be vain to the Purposes of Government if it be not owned and acknowledged in a practical Submission and active Obedience Passive Obedience or a quiet Submission to a Penalty inflicted supposeth the Failure of Active Obedience either really due or challenged as due and ever implieth a Faultiness in the Sufferer or in the Inflicter thereof an offending Subject or a persecuting Magistrate and is never undergone by an innocent Man but when the Sovereign cannot be obeyed unless God be dishonoured and then only is properly denominated Obedience in a divine Construction when the Penalty suffered is not deserved and the divine Authority is preferred before the abused Authority of Man The primary End of all Laws is for the Regulation of our Actions and Manners either to restrain us from disorders and doing what is evil or to direct us to promote and do what is good and therefore the Law cannot be satisfied and fulfilled without an active Compliance and Obedience The Sanction of Laws with the Threatnings of Penalties is but a subordinate Means to this end and the Law-giver is then best pleased when the Fear thereof prevents the hurt as he intended it should do To conceit that we have discharged our Duties to our Superiors because we have peaceably submitted our selves to those Penalties are allotted to the Transgressors of their Laws is to think that Devils and damned Spirits who are despisers of God's Laws do perform their Duties to God because they suffer for their offences according to their deserts We cannot therefore approve our selves to God or Man without an active Obedience to the Higher Powers in all things which their Authority warrants them to require from us The Church of England's Doctrine of Non-Resistance Justified and Vindicated c. Rom. 13.2 And they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation THE next Doctrine to be discoursed is as plainly expressed as the former is implied in the Text and 't is this They that resist the Higher Powers bring themselves under the Guilt of eternal Damnation As they that obey the Gospel Precepts shall be saved Heb. 5.9 So they that disobey them shall be damned 2 Thes 1.8 9. Now as the Evangelical Doctrine exacts Subjection to the Higher Powers so it forbids Resistance and therefore all rebellious Resisters of them deserve to be damned and without repentance shall eventually and actually be damned Sect. 112 Some Men have labour'd hard to restrain the Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 translated Damnation to a temporal Mulet or Punishment from the Magistrate only as if Resistance were only a dangerous Incentive to the Magistrate and no hazardous provocation to God at all By their Doctrine if a Rebel be strong enough he is safe enough Or if he escape apprehension and legal execution by flight or any other way of prevention he may bless himself in Peace If the Terrors of the Magistrate seize him not the Terrors of the Lord shall not reach him but if resistance of the Higher Powers be a Resistance of the Ordinance of God and a Contempt of the Authority of God as well as of Man why should not God be offended as well as the Magistrate and the Offender stand guilty of Damnation before the Tribunal of God as well as before the Tribunal of Man 'T is not often that Rebellions are prosperous and successful and therefore the Church of England exhorts us in her Sermon against willful Rebellion in Part the Fourth saying Turn over and read the Histories of all Nations look ever the Chronicles of our own Country call to mind so many Rebellions of old time and some yet fresh in memory ye shall not find that God ever prospered any Rebellion against their natural and lawful Prince but contrariwise that the Rebels were overthrown and slain and such