Selected quad for the lemma: kingdom_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
kingdom_n	pope_n	power_n	rome_n	1,822	5	6.3154	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A29487	[A Brief] vindication of the Parliamentary proceedings against the late King James II proving that the right of succession to government (by nearness of blood) is not by the law of God or nature, but by politick institution : with several instances of deposing evil princes, shewing, that no prince hath any title originally but by the consent of the people.		1689 (1689)	Wing B4656; ESTC R17719	41,711	76

rendred useless 't will be natural to conclude That the Means we have used were the only effectual ones for our Peace and Happiness and that one Restauration is enough in an Age. Now there are some superficial Objections made against the Deposition of the late King viz. That many Kings have been privately Assassinated but that we hear of none who have been publickly Deposed by the Jurisdiction of a National Council or Assembly without the Limits of our own Kingdom In Answer to which I shall endeavour to make it appear That it hath been the practice of all Nations and at all times to assert their Jurisdiction as we have done by the Deposition of Evil Princes whenever they had the means to effect it And we may safely bid any of our Neighbouring Kingdoms who have not been in our Circumstances to cast the first Stone at us Now as previous to our main design we shall lay down this Position and shew our Reasons for it That as Government and Authority in general is from God so the particular Forms and Magistrates are left to the Election of the People that is Whether they 'l have Democracy which is Popular Government by the People it self as Athens Thebes and many other Cities of Greece had in old times or as the Cantons or Switzers at this day have or else Aristocracy which is the Government of some certain Chosen number of the best as the Romans many years were govern'd by Consuls and Senators which the States of Holland imitate at this day Or else Monarchy which is the Regiment of one and this of an Emperour King Duke Earl or the like These particular Forms I say are not determin'd by God or Nature as Government in general is for then they should be all one in all Nations as the other is seeing God and Nature are one to all but it is left to every Nation and Country to chuse that Form of Government which they shall like best which Aristotle proveth throughout all the second and fourth Books of his Politicks very largely laying down divers kinds of Governments in his days as in Greece that of the Milesians Lacedemonians Candians and others and sheweth the Causes of their difference which he attributes to the diversity of Mens Natures Customs Educations and other such Causes that inclined them to make Choice of such or such Forms And this might be proved also by infinite other Examples both of Time past and present and in all Nations and Countries which have not had only different Forms of Government the one from the other but even among themselves at one time one Form and another at other times For the Romans first had Kings and after rejecting them for their Evil Government they chose Consuls which were two Governours for every Year whose Authority they limited by a multitude of Senators which were of their Council and these mens Power was restrained also by adding Tribunes of the People and sometimes Dictators and finally they came to be governed last of all by Emperours The like may be said of Carthage in Africa and many Cities and Commonwealths of Greece which in divers Seasons and upon divers Causes have taken different Forms of Government to themselves The like we see in Europe at this Day Naples hath a King for its Sovereign Rome the Pope Venice and Genoua have Senators and Dukes but their Dukes have little Authority Florence Mantua Parma Vrbin and Savoy have their Dukes only without Senatours and their Power is Absolute Milan was once a Kingdom but now a Dukedom Burgundy and Lorain had once Kings and after Dukes and now Kings again Bohemia and Polonia were formerly Dukedoms and now are Kingdoms The like may be said of France after the expulsion of the Romans which was first a Monarchy under Pharamond their first King and so continued for many years under Clodion Merovis Childerik and Clodovaeus their first Christian Kings but after it was divided into four Kingdoms one of Paris another of Soissons the third of Orleance and the fourth of Metz and so it continued for many years but afterwards it was one Monarchy again England also was first a Monarchy under the Britains and then a Province under the Romans and after an Heptarchy under the Saxons and now a Monarchy again under the English And all this by Gods permission and approbation who in token thereof suffered his own Peculiar People of Israel to be under divers manners of Government in divers Times as first under Patriarchs Abraham Isaac and Jacob then under Captains as Moses Joshua and the like then under Judges as Othniel Ehud and Gideon then under High-Priests as Ely and Samuel then under Kings as Saul David and the rest and then under Captains and High-Priests again as Zorobabel Judas Machabeus and his Brethren until the Government was taken from them and they brought under the Power of the Romans Wherefore there can be no doubt but that the Commonwealth hath power to chuse their own Form of Government as also to change the same upon reasonable Causes as we shall make appear they have done in all Times and Countries and God no doubt approveth what the Realm determineth in this Point for otherwise nothing could be certain for on these Changes depend the Titles of all Princes and Potentates from the foundation of the World and if they should not be justifiable we must condemn as Illegal the Acts and Jurisdiction of almost all the Princes and Governours that ever have Reign'd which were great rashness and folly to do In like manner it is evident That as the Commonwealth hath Authority to chuse and change her Government so hath she also to limit the same with what Laws and Conditions she pleaseth from whence ensueth the diversity of Power which each of the former Governments had as the Dukes of Venice at this day are for their Lives except in certain Cases wherein they may be Deposed and those of Genoua only for two years and their Power is very small and much limited and their Heirs have no Claim or Pretence at all after them to that Dignity as the Children and next of Kin of other Dukes of Italy have thô in different sort also For that the Dukedoms of Vrbin and Parma are limited only to the Heirs Males and for defect thereof to return to the Pope or See of Rome Florence and Mantua are to return to the Empire for like defects and not to pass to the Heirs Female or next of Kin as Savoy and others do And now if we respect God and Nature as well might all these Governments follow one Law as so different for that neither God nor Nature prescribeth any of these particular Forms but concurreth with that the Commonwealth appointeth and so it is to be believ'd That God concur'd as well with Italy when it had but one Prince as now when it hath so many and the like also with Switzerland which once was one Commonwealth under Dukes

and a Prince Ruling by his Will is less than a Man or a man Brutified In another place the same Philosopher saith Aristot lib. 1. cap. 2. That a Prince who leaveth Law and Ruleth himself and others by his Appetite is of all Creatures the worst and of all Beasts the most furious and dangerous For that nothing is so outragious as Injustice Arm'd and no Armour is so strong as Wit and Authority the first he hath as Man the other as a Prince For this cause all Commonwealths have prescribed Laws unto their Princes whereby to govern as by a most excellent certain and immutable Rule to which sense Cicero said Leges sunt inventoe Lib. 2. Offic. ut omnibus semper una eadem v●ce loquerentur For which reason they have been called by Philosophers a Rule or Square inflexible But the Prophet David who was also a King seemeth to call them by the Name of Discipline for that as Discipline keeps all the parts of a Man or of a particular House in order so Law duly administred keeps all the Members of a Commonwealth in Peace and Plenty And to shew how severely God exacteth this at all Princes hands Psal 2. he uses these Words And not learn ye Kings and be instructed ye Princes of the Earth Serve God in fear and rejoyce in him with trembling Embrace the Discipline lest he enter into wrath and so ye perish from the way of Righteousness Which Words being spoken by a Prophet and a King contain many Points worthy of Consideration As first That Kings are pound to learn Law and Discipline Secondly To observe the same with great humility and fear of Gods Wrath And Thirdly That if they do not they shall perish from the way of Righteousness As if the greatest Plague imaginable to a Prince were to lose the Way of Righteousness Law and Justice in his Government and to give himself over to Passion and his own Will whereby he is sure to come to Shipwreck From like Authority and for like Consideration have come the Limitation of all Kings and Kingly Power in all Times and in all Countries both touching themselves their Posterity and Successors Which is apparent in the two most Renowned States of the World that of the Romans and Grecians who both began with Kings but yet with far different Laws and Restraints about their Authorities For in Rome the Kings that succeeded Romulus had great Authority but yet their Children or next in Blood succeeded them not unless chosen by the Senate and People so as of the Three most excellent Kings that ensued immediately after Romulus viz. Numa Pompilius Tullius Hostilius and Tarquinus Priscus Tit. Liv. lib. 1. doe 1. none of them were of the Blood Royal nor of Kin to one another nor yet Romans born but chosen rather from amongst Strangers for their Vertue and Valour In Greece among the Lacedemonians which was the most eminent Kingdom at that time the Succession of Children was most certain but yet their Power was so restrain'd by the Ephori as they were not only checked and chastned by them if occasion served but also Deprived and sometimes put to Death For this Cause Aristotle did justly mislike this eminent Jurisdiction of the Ephori over their Kings but yet we see hereby what Authority the Commonwealth had in this case and what their meaning was in making Laws and restraining their Kings Power viz. thereby the more to bind them to do Justice We may repeat a multitude of such Examples in Heathen Kingdoms but being they may be rejected as being no President for us we shall haste to shew How Christian Kingdoms have limited their Princes Now if we consider the Roman Empire as it is at this day annexed to the German Electors thô it be the first in Dignity amongst Christian Princes yet we shall see it so restrained by particular Laws as the Emperour cannot do so much as other Kings for he can neither make War nor exact any Mony but by the free leave and consent of the German Dyer or Parliament and as for his Children or next of Kin they have no Interest or Pretence to succeed in their Fathers Dignity but only by free Election if they shall be thought worthy Nay one of the chiefest Points that the Emperour must Swear at his Entrance is Sleyden lib. 8. That he will never go about to make the Dignity of the Empire Peculiar or Hereditary to his Family but leave it to the Electors free in their power to chuse his Successor according to the Law made by Pope Gregory the Fifth and the Emperour Charles the Fourth The Kingdom of Polonia is much of the same manner with the Empire both for its restraint of Power Cromenias lib. 3. hist Polo and successions of its King for they have great Limitations being they can do nothing of great moment without the consent of certain Principal Officers called Palatines or Castellans neither may their Children succeed them unless they are Chosen as in the Empire in Spain France and England the Priviledges of Kings is much different from the former The Kings of Spain and France have greater Power than the Kings of England for that every Ordination of these two Kings is Law it self without the Approbation of the Commonwealth But in the Point of Succession it appeareth that the restraint is far greater in those two Countreys than in England for in Spain the next of Blood cannot succeed but by a new Approbation of the Nobility and Bishops of the Realm as it is expresly set down in the two Ancient Councils of Toledo the 4th and 5th In France the World knows that Women are not admitted to succeed in the Crown be they never so near in Blood neither any of their Issue thô it be Male. For which cause Edward the Third of England thô he were Son and Heir to the Daughter of France whose three Brothers were Kings and left her sole Heir to her Father Philip the Fourth yet was he put by the Crown and Philip de Valois a Brothers Son of Philip the 4th preferr'd to it by general Consent of the whole Parliament of Paris And thô the Salic Law is not very ancient as the French themselves do confess and much less made by Pharamond their first King or in those ancient Times as some without ground do affirm yet we see its sufficient to bind all Princes and Subjects of that Realm to observe the same and alter the course of Natural Descent and Nearness of Blood as we have seen but such things are not suffered in England for that our Laws are otherwise which were made by the Commonwealth By all which it is manifest that most Kingdoms have different Laws and Customs both as to their Authority and Succession and it is not enough for a man to alledge bare propinquity of Blood for that he may be excluded for several other Reasons which we shall hereafter discuss I