a Corporation by the Common-Law 14 H. 8. f. 3. as the King Lords and Commons are a Corporation in Parliament and therefore they are no body without the King The death of the King dischargeth all mainprise to appeare in any Court or to keepe the peace 34 Ed 3.48 1 Ed. 4.2 The death of the King discontinues all Pleas by the Common-law 2 H. 4.8 1 H. 7.10 1 Ed. 5 1. which agreeth not with the virtuall power insisted upon now Writs are discontinued by the death of the King Ed 6. 2 Ed. 6. c. 7. Patents or Judges Commission for Justices of the Peace Sheriffs Escheators determined by his death where is the virtuall power All authority and jurisdiction spirituall and temporall is derived from the King 1 Ed. 6. c. 2. therefore none from the Housess His Majesties Subjects â— 3 Ed. 6. c. 2. 11 H. 7. c. 1. Calvins Case sâ— part Cooke 1 Pars instit 69. according to their bounden duties ought to serve the King in his warres of this side or beyond the Seas beyond the seas is to be understood for wages This proves the power of warres and preparation for warre to be in the King It is most necessary both for common policy and duty of the Subject 5.6 Ed. c. 11. to restraine all manner of shamefull standers against their King which when they be heard cannot but be odible to his true and loving subjects upon whom dependeth the whole unity and universall weale of the Realme This condemnes their continuing of the weekely Pamphlets who have beene so foule mouthed against his Majesty The punishment of all offendors against the Lawes Q. â—â—ary 1. Mar. Pl. 2. cap. 2. belongs to the King and all jurisdictions do and of right ought to belong to the King This leaves all to his Majesty All Commissions to leavy men for the warre 4.5 P. M. c â— Q Eliz. 10 Eliz. Pl. 315. are awarded by the King The power of warre onely belongs to the King It belongs to the King to defend his people and to provide Armes and Force No speech of the two Houses Roy ad sble governmeni de ses subjects Plow 234.242.213 Calvins case 7. pars fol. 12. Plow com 213. Corps naturall le Roy politique sunt un corps That is the king hath the sole government of his Subjects the body politick and the naturall body of the King make one body and not divers and are inseperable and indivisible The body naturall and politique make one body Plou 914.243.213 Calvins case 7. pars fol. 12 and are not to be severed Ligeance is due to the naturall body and is due by nature Gods Law and Mans Law cannot be forfeited nor renounced by any meanes it is inseparable from the person Every Member of the House of Commons 1 Eliz cap. 1 Candries case 5 pars fol. 1 at every Parliament takes a corporall Oath That the King is the supreame and onely Governour in all causes in all his Dominions otherwise he is no Member of that House The words of the Law are in all causes over all persons The said Act of 1 Eliz. is but declarative of the ancient Law 4â— Eliz. 3. pars instit fol. 6.2 Candries Case ibid. The Earle of Essex and others assembled multitudes of men to remove Councellors adjudged Treason by all the Judges of England To depose the King 39 Eliz. Hil. 1 Iacobi ibid or take him by force to imprison him untill he hath yeelded to certaine demands adjudged Treason and adjudged accordingly in the Lord Cobbams Case Atising to alter Religion established 39 Ed. Brad case f. 9. 16. By all the Judges of England ibid. 10. Eli. Plow 316 or any Law is treason so for taking of the Kings Castles Forts Ports or Shipping Brooke treason 24.3 4. Philip and Mary Dier Staffords Case concerning Scarborough The Law makes not the servant greater then the Master nor the subject greater then the King for that were to subvert order and measure The Law is not knowne but by Usage and Usage proves the Law 10 Eliz. Plow 31â— and how Usage hath been is notoriously knowne The King is our onely rightfull and lawfull Leige Lord and Soveraigne K. Iames 1 Iac. cap. 1 9 Ed 4 fol 8 we doe upon the knees of our hearts adnize constant Faith Loyalty and Obedience to the King and his Royall progeny in this high Court of Parliament where all the body of the Realme is either in person or by representation We doe acknowledge hat the true and sincere Religion of he Church is continued and established by the King And doe recognize as we are bound by the Law of God and Man the Realme of England and the Imperiall crowne thereof doth belong to him by inherent birth-right and lawfull and undoubted succession and submit our selves and our posterities for ever untill the last drop of our blood be spent to his rule and beseech the King to accept the same as the first fruits of our Loyalty and faith to his Majesty and his posterity for ever and for that this Act is not compleat nor perfect without his Majesties assent the same is humbly desired This proves that the Houses are not above the King that Kings have not their titles to the Crown by the two Houses but by inherent birth right and that there can be no Statute without his expresse assent and destroyes the Chimera of the Kings virtuall being in the Houses To promise obedience to the Pope or any other State 3 Iae. cap. 4. 23 Eliz. c. 1. Prince or Potentate other then the King his heyres and successors is treason and therefore those persons who call the houses the Estates offend this Law Such Bils as his Majesty is bound in conscience and justice to passe K. Charles Collection of Ordinances fol. 727. 1 pars ib. fol. 728. are no Law without his assent To designe the ruine of the Kings person or of Monarchy is a monstrous and injurious charge Vbi lâ—x non distinguit non est distinguendum ibid. fol. 865. all the aforesaid Acts and Lawes do evidently prove the Militia to belong to the King that the King is not virtually in the two Houses that the King is not considerable separately in relation to his politick capacity that the King is not a person trusted with a power but that it is his inherent birth-right from God Nature and Law and that he hath not his power from the people These Lawes have none of those distinctions of naturall and politicke abstractum concretum power and person in Caesars time this Island had Kings and ever since which is almost 17 hundred yeares agoe No King can be named in any time made in this Kingdome by the people A Parliament never made King for they were Kings before the Parliaments are summoned by the Kings Writs which for Knights Citizens and Burgesses begins thus
same cause and therefore the House of Peeres being a party touching the crime charged upon any man whom they would try by an Ordinance for Treason against both Houses cannot be a Iudge By the Petition of Right e Petition of Right 3. C.R. if any man deserve death he ought to suffer the same according to the Laws of the Land established and not otherwise but an Ordinance of the Lords is no established Law The protestation the Vow and Covenant the solemn League and Covenant the Declarations of both houses had made and published sithence this unnaturall Warre 3 part inst fol. 89. are amongst other things sworn and set downe to be for maintainance of the Lawes the people of this land ought to enjoy the benefit of their Birth-right the Law of the Land and the making good of the said protestation Vow and Covenant League and Covenant and Declarations otherwise truth must be said and will be said that there is brought in a new arbitrary and tyrannicall government If the Lords have taken one mans life by an Ordinance they are not bound to take any more and the case differs in case any appeale be made from a tryall by Ordinance to a tryall at common Law which was not done by that man whose life was taken away by an Ordinance The Lords ought to remember that His Majesty and His progenitors have made them a house of peers they are trusted to counsell him in peace f Nevels case 8 pare Cooks reports and defend him in warre his Majesty in Parliament is to consult and treate with the Peers and with his Councell at Law Judges his Sergeants Atturney and Solicitor and Masters of the Chancery the Lords and that counsell by the respective Writ of Summons to Parliament are to give Counsell g 4 pars instit fol. 4.9 27 Edw. 3. c. 1.15 3 part instit fol. 225. the House of Commons by their Writ to performe and consen◠In the House of Lords the Court of Parliament onely is for they onely examine upon Oath h 1 Hen. 7. fol. 10. with them the King in person sits and by them their erroneous judgements * 14. H. 3. c. 5 upon a Petition to his Majesty for obtaining of a Writ of Errour by the advice of the Judges are reversed or affirmed c. The Lords are to remember that their eminency and grandeur is preserved by the Lawes if they leave all to will and dishonour their King and make nothing of the Lawes they will make nothing of themselves in the end And therefore it is well worth your observation what was said by M. Iohn Pym a Member of the House of Commons in his speech against the Earle of Strafford in the beginning of the Parliament which speech is published by the expresse order of the House of Commons the words are these The Law is that which puts a difference betwixt good and evill betwixt just and unjust if you take away the Law all things will fall into a confusion every man will become a Law unto himselfe which in the depraved condition of humane nature must needs produce many great enormities Lust will become a Law and Envie will become a Law Covetousnesse and Ambition will become Lawes 〈◊〉 1 pal book deel pag. 140. 163. and what dictates what decisions such Lawes will produce may easily be discerned i. c. They that love this Common-wealth as things now stand will use all means to procure an Act of Oblivion a generall pardon from His Majesty the Souldiers their Arreares and tender consciences a just and reasonable satisfaction else we must all perish first or last May 17 1647 God preserve His Majesty and the Lawes wherein their Lordships and the whole Kingdom are concerned David Jenkins prisoner in the Tower of London THE CORDIALL OF Iudge Ienkins For the good People of LONDON In reply to a Thing called An Answer to the poysonous seditious Paper of Mr. DAVID IENKINS by H. P. Barrister of Lincolns-Inne Printed in the Yeare 1648. The Cordiall of Judge JENKINS for the good People of LONDON AFter the said Mr. H.P. hath made a recitall of the heads of my Vindication he deduced his Answer unto these eight particulars which follow verbatim 1. It cannot be denyed but the Parliament sits by the Kings Writ nay if Statute Law bee greater than the Kings Writ it cannot be denyed but the Parlia fits or ought to sit by something greater than the Kings Writ and if it be confessed that the Parl. sits by the kings writ but do not act by the Kings writ then it must follow that the Parlia is a void vaine Court and sits to no purpose nay it must also follow that the Parl. is of less authority and of less use than any other inferiour Court forasmuch as it is not in the Kings power to controule other Courts or prevent them from sitting or acting 2. This is a gross nonsequitur the Kings power is in himself Ergo it is not derived to nor does reside vertually in the Parliament For the light of the Sun remains imbodied and unexhausted in the Glob of the Sun at the same time as it is diffused and displayed through al the body of the aire and who sees not that the King without emptying himselfe gives Commissions daily of Oyre and Terminer to others which yet himself can neither frustrate nor elude but for my part I conceive it is a great error to infer that the Parliament hath only the Kings power because it hath the Kings power in it for it seemes to me that the Parliament does both sit and act by concurrent power devolved both from the King and Kingdome and in this some things are more obvious and apparent than in others For by what power does the Parliament grant Subsidies to the King if onely by the power which the King gives then the K. may take Subsidies without any grant from the Parliament and if it be so by a power which the people give to the Parliament then it wil follow the Parliament hath a power given both by King and Kingdom 3. The sending Propositions to the King and desiring his concurrence is scarce worth an Answer for Subjects may humbly petition for that which is their strict right and property Nay it may sometimes beseem a Superior to prefer suit to an inferior for matters in themselves due God himself hath not utterly disdained to beseech his owne miserable impious unworthy creatures besides 't is not our Tenet that the King hath no power because hee hath not all power nor that the King cannot at all promote our happinesse because he hath no just claime to procure our ruine 4. We affirm not that the Kings power is separated from his person so as the two Spencers affirmed neither doe we frame conclusions out of that separation as the two Spencers did either that the King may be removed for misdemeanours or performed per asperte or that the
which are the Common lawes of the land Doth Excise the Fifth and Twentieth parts Meal-money and many more Burdens which this Land never heard of before maintaine the Liberties of the people You and that party of the two Houses made the Army by severall Declarations before Engagement believe that you would preserve the Kings Honour and Greatnessâ— the Lawes and Liberties of the people The Army and the whole Kingdome now facta vident see your Actions and have no reason longer to believe your Oathes Vowes and Declarations and since that party in the two Houses refuse to performe any thing according to their said Oathes Vowes And Declarations the Army and the Kingdome may and ought both by your own principles and the Lawes of the Land to pursue the ends for which they were raised And so your first Quare is resolved whereby it is manifest that specious pretences to carry on ambitious and pernitious Designes fix not upon the Army but upon you and the prevailing party in both Houses 3 par Inst f. 12.39 El. 1 Iac. ibi 3 3. E. 6. c. 3 11. 〈◊〉 7. c. 1. The solution of the second Quaere The Army to their eternall honour have freed the King from imprisonment at Holmby It was High Treason to imprison his Majesty To free his Majesty from that imprisonment was to deliver him out of Trayterous hands which was the Armies bounden duty by the Law of God and the Land That party refused to suffer his Majesty to have two of his Chaplaines for the exercise of his Conscience who had not taken the Covenant free accesse was not permitted doth the Army use his Majesty so all men see that accesse to him is free and such Chaplaines as his Majesty desired are now attending on his Grace Who are the guilty persons the Army who in this action of delivering the King act according to Law or the said parâ—y who acted Treasonably against the Law Who doth observe the Protestation better they who imprison their King or they who free him from prison That this Army was raised by the Parliament is utterly false The Army was raised by the two Houses upon the specious pretences of the Kings Honour common safety and the preservation of Lawes and Liberties which how made good hath beene shewed before and all the people of the Kingdome do finde by wofull experience The two Houses are no more a Parliament than a Body without a Head a Man 14 H. 8 3.36 H. 7 Dier 60 4 pars Instit p. 1 3 12 14.16 R. 2 c. 1â— 5 Eliz. c. 2 17. Carol. The Act for the continuance of this Parliament The two Houses can make no Court without the King they are no Body Corporate without the King they all Head and Members make one Corporate Body And this is so clear a Truth that in this Parliament by the Act of 17. Caroli it is declared That the Parliament shall not be dissolved or prorogued but by Act of Parliament but the two Houses may respectively adjourne themselves Two Houses and a Parliament are severall things cuncta fidem vera faciunt all circumstances agree to prove this truth Before the Norman conquest and since to this day 4 par Instit p. 18.4 par Instit p. 4 9 5 Eliz c. i 2 the King is holden Principium caput Finis that is the beginning Head and chiefe end of the Parliament as appeareth by the Treatise of the manner of holding of Parliaments made before the Norman Conquest by the Writ of Summons of Parliament whereby the Treaty and Parler in Parliament is to be had with the King only by the Common Law by the Statute-Law by the Oath of Supremacy taken at this and every Parliament it doth manifestly appeare that without the KING there can be no coulour of a Parliament How many Votes have they revoked in one Session yea and Bills Was there ever the like done Nay is not the constant course of Parliaments violated and made nothing thereby They are guarded by armed men divide the publike Mony among themselves and that party endeavours to bring in a Forraigne Power to invade this Land againe If they be no Parliament as clearly they are none without his Majesty they have no privâ—ledges but do exercise an Arbitrary Tyrannicall and Treasonable power over the people By the Law of the Land 7 E. 4 20 8 E. 4 3 9 E. 4.27 4 H 7 18 27 H 8 23. when Treason or Felony is committed it is lawfull for every Subject who suspects the Offendor to apprehend him and to secure him so that Justice may be done upon him according to the Law You say the disobedience of the Army is a sad publick president like to conjure up a spirit of universall disobedience I pray object not that conjuring up to the Army whereof you and the prevailing party in the Houses are guilty who conjured up the spirit of universall disobedience against his Majesty your and our onely Supreme Governour but you and that party in the two Houses and even then when the House of Commons were taking and did take the said Oath of Supremacy For the Covenant you mention it is an Oath against the Lawes of the Land against the petition of Right devised in Scotland wherein the first Article is to maintaine the Reformed Religion in the Church of Scotland And certainly there is no Subject of the English Nation doth know what the Scottish Religion is 2 par Coll. of Ord. pag. 803. 3 par Inst fol. 165. Petition of Right 3. Car. â— pars instit 71â— I beleeve the Army tooke not the Covenant No man by the Law can give an Oath in a new case without an Act of Parliament and therefore the imposers thereof are very blameable and guilty of the highest Crime The Writer of these Quaeres seems to professe the Laws Let him declare what Act of Parliament doth justifie the tendring giving or taking of the said Oath he knoweth there is none he knoweth that all the parts of it are destructive of the Laws and Government to maintaine which the Law of Nature and the Law of the Land hath obliged them The Oath of the Covenant makes the Houses supream Governours in causes Ecclesiastical the Oath of Supremacy makes the King so and yet both taken by the same persons at the same time What credit is to be given to persons who make nothing of Oathes and contradict themselves How do the Covenant the Oath of Supremacy agree How do their protestation and the Covenant agree How do their Declarations and Oaths agree The Lord be mercifull to this Land for these Oaths It is a sad thing to consider that so many Gentlemen who professe the Lawes and so many worthy men in both Houses should be so transported as they are knowing that the Lawes of the Land from time to time and in all times are contrary to all their actions and that they yet should amuse
themselves and the people with the word Parliament without the King and with the Covenant whereas they know they are no Parliament without His Majesty And that English men throwout the Kingdome should swear a Covenant to preserve the reformed Religion of Scotland in Doctrine Worship Discipline and Government which they do no more know than the Doctrine Worship Discipline and Government of Prester John in Aethiopia if they consider it they cannot but discerne that this is a high desperate and impious madnesse Be wise in time Without the King and the Lawes you will never have one hour of safety for your Persons Wives Children or Estates Be good to your selves and to your posterities apply your selves to be capable of an Act of Oblivion and of a generall Pardon and to be able and willing to pay the Souldiery and to allow a reasonable liberty for mens consciences and God will blesse your endeavours and the people to whom you are now very hatefull will have you in better estimation The third Quaere is thus answered You resemble the Army to Jack Cade and his complices and you cite the Act of Parliament of 31. Hen. 6. cap. 1. And that it may appear who acts the part of Jack Cade you and that party in the two Houses or the Army I think it necessary to set down the said Act in words at length as followeth First VVhereas the most abominable Tyrant horrible odious arrant false Traytor John Cade calling and nameing himself sometime Mortimer sometime Capt. of Kent which name fame acts and feates are to be removed out of the speech and minds of every faithfull Christian man perpetually falsly and tralterously purposing and imagining the perpetuall destruction of the Kings said Person finall subversion of this Realm taking upon him Royall Power and gathering to him the Kings people in great numbers by false subtile imagined language and seditiously making a stirring Rebellion Insurrection under colour of Iustice for Reformation of the Lawes of the said King robbing stealing and spoyling great part of his faithfull people Our said Soveraigne Lord the King considering the premises with many other which were more odious to remember by the advice and consent of the Lords aforesaid at the request of the said Commons and by authority aforesaid hath Ordained and established that the said John Cade shall be reputed had named and declared a false Trayper to enr Soveraigne Lord the King and that all his tyranny acts feats and false opinions shall be voyded abated nulled destroyed and put out of remembrance for ever and that all Indictments and all things depending thereof had and made under to power of Tyranuy shall be likewise void anuulled abated repealed and holden for none and that the blood of none of them be thereof defiled nor corrupted but by the Authority of the said Parliament clearly declared for ever and that all Indictments in times coming in like case under power of Tyranny Rebellion and Stirring had shall be of no Record nor effect but void in Law and all the petitions delivered to the said King in his last Parliament holden at VVestm Nov 6 in the 29. of his râ—igne against his mind by him not agreed shall be taken and put in oblivion out of remembrance undone voided aâ—ulled and destroyed for ever as a thing purposed against God and Conscience and against his Royall Estate and preeminence and also dishonourable and unreasonable Now we are to examine who hath trod in the steps of Iack Cade you and the present prevailing party of both Houses tooke upon them and do take all the Royall power in all things so did Iack Cade as appeares by the said Act the Army do not so They who imprison the King purpose to destroy his person our imprisoned Kings aswaies * Edward 1. Henry 6 Richard 2. fared so Iack Cade did likewise so purpose The said party in the two Houses made a stirring under colour of Instice for reformation of the Lawes so did Iac Cade The Army do not so but desire that the Lawes should be observed lack Cade levied war against the King The Army preserves Him Iack Cade dyed a Declared Traitor to his Soveraign Lord the King this army might have lived to have the glorious true Honor of being restorers of their King Simon Sudbury Archbishop of Canterbury was murthered by Jack Straw William Laud Archbishop of Canterbury was likewise murthered by that party of the two Houses 25 Ed. 3 4.28 Ed. 3.3 Petition of Right for that an Ordinance hy Law cannot take away any mans life and his life was taken away by an Ordinance of the two Houses the army had no hand in it Many misted by Iack Straw perceiving his Trayterous purposes fell from him and as that was lawfull just and honourable so it is for this Army to adhere to their naturall King and so endeavour to settle the Kingdome again in the just Lawes and Liberties thereof London did then right worthily adhere to the King and the Laws and not to Jack Straw and his specious pretences and it is hoped they will now so do By this it appeares that the Gentlemans Discourse touching Iack Cade fastens altogether on his party and cleareth the Army To the IV. which is resolved thus The Arreares of the Army howbeit it is the least thing they look after yet being not paid them it is by the Law of the Land a sufficient cause to leave and desert that party in the Houses a person who serves in any kinde and is not paid his Wages the desertion of that service is warrantable by the Lawes of the Land You say the Houses will reforme all things when the Army doth disband Fitz. N B 159 9 Ed. 4 20.38 H. 6 27 23 Eliz. Dier 369. Who will believe it Will any beleive that the setling of the Presbytery will do it Will any believe that his Majesty will passe the propositions sent to Him to Newcastle Will any man believe that this Kingdome will ever be quiet without his Majesty and the ancient and just Lawes Can the Members of the Army conceive any of them to be safe in any thing without a pardon from his Majesty Have they not seen some of their fellowes hanged before their eyes for actions done as Soldiers Shall the Kingdom have no acount of the many Millions received of the publique Money Will the Members of the Houses accuse themselves Shall private and publique Debts be never paid Shall the Kingdome lie ever under burthens of oppression and Tyranny There is no visible way to remedy all these Enormities but the power of the Army To the V. wich is solved thus The Kingdom hath better assurance of Reformation from the Army than from the Houses for that in their Military way they have been just faithfull and honourable they have kept their words That party of the Houses have been constant to nothing but in dividing the publique Treasure among themselves
non licet testari this Pubertas begins at 14. it is Plena pubertas at 18 yeares of age The question is whether this jus testandi is in pubertate plena or pubertate inceptâ Pigots Case 5. part of Cookes Reports the Doctors affirmed that 17 years of age was a full age as to an infant Executor to dispose of Goods this opinion hath been by others sithence denyed Sir Edward Cook 11 part Inst sect 123. saith He must be 10. which is the time of plena pubertas 2. Hen. 4.12 an infant of 18. years of age may be a deisseissour Sir Jo. Doderigge in his booke called The Office and Duty of Executors which they say is his and it is a learned and laborious Treatise fol. 347. delivers that this opinion of 17. yeares for that ability in an infant hath been reported otherwise This latter opinion comes nearer the Common Law and the Statute Law of the Land which Common Law and Statue Law gives infants no power by Deed or Will to make any disposition of any thing they have before they be 21 yeares of of age It seems also more reasonable because infants at 18 yeares have by the intendment of Law as they grow in yeares more use of reason to discern what is fit for them to doe and act And for a meere stranger to sue in a Court of Conscience who pretends by such Wills of infants the infant Husband being ravished against the will of the Kindred of the deceased who dyed six yeares sithence without issue being 17 yeares of age and that any part of his part of his estate should go that way by a course of Equity unlesse the Law be for Mr. Erneley who heyd not a penny with his Daughter and who would have the Husband of his daughter bring him a portion by his pretended title of an Executor of an Executor of an Execueor viz. of an infant the Executor of another infant the Executor of a third person seems very strange The said Licensed Historiographer of theirs hath published the 16 of this present Moneth of February 1647. that I out of a desire to keep the Estate have in a suite in the Court of wards in my Cousins life time pleaded to the Iurisdiction of that Court. It is true I did so for I conceived that the Estate would be unsafe in Mr. Ernley's hands and I was willing to preserve it titl my young Cousin came to be of age to dispose of it himselfe according as I was trusted The Law being 32. H. 8. c. 46.4 pars inst fol. 201.202 that the Court of Wards had no jurisdiction over the personall estate for then the Marriage was paid for to the King and all due to the King ascertained It is true that that was insisted upon as was just for to preserve the Estate from Mr. Erneley who would have made what account he pleased to my Cousin at his full age And this is the truth of that businesse That I declined not the Jurisdiction of the Chancery to keepe an Estate in my hand appeares by my declining long sithence the power of the House of Commons to examine me and the Reformers have all my Estate What would Mr. Ernley have when they the Reformers have all already or can have from me if he had any colour J desire the good people of this City to observe what notorious Vntruths their Licensed Historigraphers publish to delude the people In this particular case they publish First That the Suit against me is in the behalfe of an Orphan M. Earnely who is Plaintiffe in their Court is a Wiltshire Gentleman at the least of 50. years of age there is their Orphan Secondly That I made a speech to the people at the Hall door that the questioning of me for what I had done for the KING was illegall and that the Iudges had no power to tâ—y me the KING being absent Another notorious untruth For I protest to God all that I said was onely this God preserve the KING and the Lawes Thirdly it is said that comming to the Barre I stirred not my Hat All the Lawyers then at the Barre were uncovered wherefore I held it a civility to be also uncovered and so I was as they all know Fourthly That the E. of Manchester should say I received a great estate in money of the Orphans estate As there is no truth in it so it is most untrue that the said Lord so said as all men present can testifie The truth is they care not what they do what they say what they swear nor what they write Witnes the Declaration of a prevailing party of the H. of CoÌ„mons of the 11 of this instant February who contrary to the Oath of Allegiance the Oath of Supremacy the Protestation their solmne League and Covenant their Declarations to make His Majesty a glorious King fearfull to his enemies and beloved of his Subjects and yet now after 22. yeares they would insinuate to the people that this King whom they have so much magnified hath poysoned his own Father Fiftly it is a publike notorious untruth That the Parliament hath published a Declaration against the King of the 11. of this instant Feb. whereas it is well known to be the Declaration of the prevailing party of the House of Commons only without the Lords and so they would make that prevailing partie only to be the * Their licensed Historiographer who published this is called their Kingdoms weekly post from Wednesday Feb. 7 to Wednesday the 16 of Feb. 1647 Par. liament Let the people of England beleeve their five sences how it was with them seven yeares agoe and before during his Majesties Reign how this Kingdom abounded then with Peace Plenty and Glory to the admiration envy of other Nations now let them consider and judge by their Senses sithence those men whom nothing would satisfie but all Power both by Sea and Land which in truth is the regality kingship which they call the Militia have usurped the said Power Regal whether they have not by Impostures and Delusions diffused among the people by themselves and their Agents brought a flourishing Kingdom to the most deplorable condition it now is in To the end that this Kingdome may not utterly be ruined God incline their hearts to restore his Majesty and for their own and their Posterities sake to receive from his Majesty an Act of Oblivion a generall Pardon assurance for the Arrears of the Souldierie and meet satisfaction for tender Consciences DAVID JENKINS Iudge Ienkin's Remonstrance TO THE LORDS AND COMMONS OF The two HOVSES of PARLIAMENT at WESTMINSTER the 21. of February 1647. By DAVID JENKINS Prisoner in Newgate Printed in the Yeare 1648. Judge Jenkin's REMONSTRANCE TO THE LORDS and COMMONS AT WESTMINSTER I Desire that the Lords and Commons of the two Houses would be pleased to remember and that all the good people of England do take notice of an Order of the House of Commons this
Session for publishing the Lord Cook his Bookes which Order they may find printed in the last Leafe of the second part of his Institutes in these words viz. Die Mercurii 12. May 1641. VPon Debate this Day in the Commons House of Parliament the said House did then desire held it fit that the heir of Sir Edward Cooke should publish in print the commentary upon Magna Charta the pleas of the Crown and the jurisdiction of Courts according to the intention of the said Sir Edward Cooke and that none but the Heir of the said Sir Edward Cooke or he that shall be authorized by him do presume to publish in print any of the foresaid Bookes or any Copy thereof H. Elsynge Cler. Dom. Com And I do further desire them that they would reade and peruse M. Solicitour Saint-Iohn and M. John Pym their Bookes published likewise this Session Whose Titles are as followeth viz. An Argument of Law concerning the â—ill of Attainder of High Treason of Thomas Earle of Strafford At a Conference in the Committee of both houses of Parliament By M. Saint John his Majesties Solicitor Generall Published by Order of the Commons House London Printed by G. M. for Jo. Bartlet At the Sign of the Guilt Cup neare S. Austins gate in Pauls Church yard 1641. And the Speech or Declaration of Iohn Pym Esquire After the Recapitulation or Summoning up of the charge of High Treason against Thomas Earle of Strafford 12 Aprill 1641. Published by the order of the Commons House London Printed for John Bartlet 1641. 1. Nothing is delivered for Law in my Books but what the H. of Commons have avowed to be Law in Bookes of Law published by their command this Session and agreeable to the Bookes of Law and Statutes of this Realme in all former Times and Ages 2. The supposed offence charged on me is against the two Houses and none ought to be judges and parties by the Law of this Land in their owne case 3. I desire the benefit of Magna Charta the Petition of right other good Lawes of this Land which ordaine that all mens Tryals should be by the established Lawes and not otherwise they are the very words of the petition of Right An Ordinance of both Houses is no Law of the Land 1 Part. col of Ordinances fol 728 2 Pars iust fol 47 48 157 143 4 par instit 23 232 298 4 H 7 18 by their own confession and by the Bookes of the Lord Cooke published by their Order as aforesaid this Session in six several places For Sedition in my Books there is none but such as they have authorised this Session to be published printed To publish the Law is no sedition These Positions following I doe set downe for the Law of the Land in my books and they themselves have justified and avowed them as aforesaid we agree the Law to be and to have been in all times in all the particulars following as here ensueth 3 Part instit pag 12 M Sollicitor Pag. 12 3 part instit pag 9 M Pym p. 28 3 part instit 3 10 12 16 3 part instit pag 9 M Sollicitor p 0 10 136 M Sollicitor pag 9 M Sollicitor pag 9 M Sollicitor pag 23 4 pars 4 instâ— p 125 Iustice Huttons argument fol. 39 40 4 part instit 2 part instit articul super chartas cap. 5 1. To imprison the King is high treason 2 To remove Councellours from the King by force is High Treason 3. To alter the establisht Lawes in any part by force is High Treason 4. To usurp the Royall Power is High Treason 5. To alter the Religion establisht is High Treason 6. To raise rumours and give out words to alienate the peoples affections from the King is High Treason 7. To sesse Souldiers upon the people of the Kingdome without their consent is High Treason 8. The execution of paper orders by Souldiers in a military way is high Treason 9 To coanterfeit the great Seale is High Treason 10. The Commission of Array is in force and none other 11. None can make Judges Justices Sheriffes c. but the King The King makes every Court 12. The great Seale belongs to the Kings Custody or to whome he shall appoint and none other 13. 1 part Coll. of Ordin Cook utâ— supra 4 partâ— inst 25. Ordinances of one or both Houses are noe lawes to binde the people 14. No priviledge of Parliament holds for Treason Felony or brâ—ach of the Peace not for 20. Parliament-men forty nor three hundred 15. M. Solicitor pag. 8.70 M. Solicitor pag. 12.27 M. Solicitor pag. 26. M. Solicitor pag. 35. To subvert the fundamentall lawes is High Treason 16 To levey War against the person of the King is High Treason 17. To perswade Forreiners to levey war within this Kingdome is High Treason 18 To impose unlawfull Taxes to impose new Oathes M. Pym p. 8. is High Treason 19. The King can doe no wrong 20. M. Pym p. â—7 It is a pernitious Doctrine to teach Subjects they may be discharged from the oath of Allegience M. Pym p. 24. Then what means the Doctrin of both Houses of the Votes 11 of Feb. 1647. 21. A necessity of a mans own making doth not excuse him 3. parr inst pag. 9 The requiring forcing of the Militia brought the necessity of arming upon the Houses 22. None can leavy war within this realme without authority from the King for to him only it belongeth to levy war by the common law of the land to doe otherwise is high Treason by the said Common law The only quarrel was is the Militia for which so much blood hath been spent M. Solicitor 70.71 4. part inst pag. 1.3.4 4. pars inst 41.356 and Treasure 23. No Parliament without the King he is Principium caput finis 24. Presentment or tryall by Jury is the bright-right of the Subject There is no doubt but that many in both Houses are free from this great sin and that most of the prevailing party had at first no intentions to proceed so farre but the madnesse of the People who are very vnstable and so they will find them and the successe of their Armies having this great rich City to supply them with all accomodations have so elated them that the evil is come to this height For my selfe to put me to death in this cause is the greatest honour I can possibly receive in this World Dulce decorum est mori pro partia And for a Lawyer and a Judge of the Law to die dum sanctis patria legibus obsequitur for obedience to the Lawes will be deemed by the good men of this Time a sweet smelling sacrifice and by this and future Times that I dyed full of yeares and had an honest and an honourable end And posterity will take knowledge of these Men who put some to death for subverting of the Lawes and others for supporting of them c. Yet mercy is above all the â—orkes of God Bracton l c. 9 p 107 4 pars inst 342 343 Stanford 99 The King is Gods Vâ—carâ—on earth In Bracton who was a Judge in Henry 3. time you shall â—â—nd the Kings oath To shew mercy is part of it You are all his children say and doe what you will you are all his Subjects and He is your King and parent Pro magno peccato paululum supplicii satis est patri and therefore let not the prevailing party be obdurate out of a desperation of safety That which is past is not revocable Take to your thoughts your parents your wives your children your friends your fortunes your countrey wherein Forreigners write there is Mira aeris suavitas rerum omnium abundantia Invite not them hither the only way to be free of their company will be To restore his Majesty and receive from Him an Act of Oblivion a generall pardon Assurance for the Arreares of the Souldiery and meet satisfaction to tender consciences God preserve the King and the Lawes DAVID JENKINS Prisoner in New-gate
Roys ' avisera or nâ— veulâ— it was against Magna Charta Articuli Cleri and many other Acts of Parliament And might have farther given these reasons if it had so pleased him for the same First that this Bill destroyes the Writ whereby they are made two Houses of Parliament 14 Hen. 7. fol. 22. Evesque est signior de grand honneâ—r the King in the Writ being â—um praelaris colloquium habtre Secondly they have been in all Parliaments since we had any and voted but in such wherein they themselves were concerned And there have been Bishops here sithence we were Christians and the Fundamentall Law of the Kingdome approves of them If any of them were conceived offensive they were left to Justice and his Majesty would put in inoffensive men in their places but sithence his Majesty hath passed the Bill for taking away their Vores in Parliament it is a Law that bindes us so farre Upon the whole matter the Law hath notably determined that Billa agreed by both Houses pretended to be for the publick good are to be judged by the King for in all Kings Reignes Bils have been preferred by both Houses which alwaies are pretended to be for the publique good and many times are not and were rejected with Roy's auisera or Roy ne veult This Parliament began the 3 of Novemb. 1640. before that time in all the kings reign no armed power did force any of the people to doe any thing against the Law what was done was by his Judges Officers Refers and Ministers from that time untill the 10. os Ia. 1641. when the King went from London to avoyd the danger of frequent tumults being a year and 3 months Privie Counsellors and all his Justices Ministers were lest to the Justice of the Law there wanted not time to punish punishable men The Sphere of the House of Commons is to represent the grievances of the Countrey to grant aydes for the King upon all fit occasions extraordinary to assent to the making or abrogating of Lawes The Orb of the House of Lords to reforme erroneous judgements given in the Kings Bench to redresse the delayes of Courts of Justice to receive all Petitions to advise his Majesty with their Councell to have their Votes in making or abrogating of Lawes and to propose for the common good what they conceive meet Lex non cogit ad impossibilia Subjects are not to expect from Kings impossible things so many Judges Councellours Sheriffes Justices of the Peace Commissioners Ministers of State that the King should over-looke them all cannot be it is impossible The King is vertually in his ordinary Courts of Justice so long as they continue his Courts their charge is to administer the Lawes in being and not to delay deferre oâ— sell Justice for any Commandment of the King We have Lawes enough Instrumenta boni saeculi sunt bonâ— viri good Ministers as Judges and Officers are many times wanting the houses propose new Lawes or abrogation of the old both induce novelty the Law for the reasons aforesaid makes the King the onely Judge who is assisted therein by a great number of grave learned and prudent men as aforesaid For the considerations aforesaid the Kings Party adheared to him the â—aw of the Lnnd is their Birth-â—ight their Guide no offence is committed where that is not violated they found the Commission of Aâ—â—ray warrauted by the Law they found the King in this Parliament to have quitted the Shâ—-money Knighthood-money seven Courts of Justice consented to a Triennall Parliament setled the Forrest hounds tooke away the Cearke of the Market of the houshold trusted the House with the Navy passed an Act not to dâ—â—olve this Parliament without the Houses assent no people in the world so free if they could have been content with Lawes Oathes and reaâ—â—â— and nothing more could or can be devised to secure us neither hath been in any time Notwithstanding all this we found the King driven from London by frequent tumults that two thirds an dt more of the Lords had disserted tha House for the same cause and the greater part of the House of Commons left that House also for the same reason new men chosen in their places against Law by the pretended Warrant of a connterfet Seale and in the Kings name against his consent leavying Warre against him and seizing his Ports Forts Magazines and Revenue and converting them to his destruction and the subversion of the Law and Land laying Taxes on the people never heard of before in this Land devised new Oathes to oppose Forces raised by the King nor to adhere to him but to them in this Warre which they call the 〈◊〉 the Oath and the V. W. and Covenant By severall wayes never used in this kingdome they have raised Monies to foment this Warre and especially to inrich some among them namely first Exâ—is secondly Contributions thirdly Sequestrations fourthly Fift-parts fiftly Twentieth-parts sixtly 〈◊〉 money seventhly Sale of Plundered gpods eightly Loanes ninthly Benedolentes tenthly 〈◊〉 upon their fast-dayes eleventhly new Impoâ—tions upon Merchandâ—res twelfely Gâ—ards maintained upon the charge of private men thirteenthly Fifty Subâ—â—dies at â—â—e time fourteenthly Compossâ—â—ons with such as they call Delinquents fifteentlaly Sale of Bishppâ— Lands c. From the Kings Party meanes of subsistance are taken 〈◊〉 R 3. cap. 3 Bract. li. 3. c. 8. Stanford 192. Sir Ger. Flâ—â—twoods Case S. pars Cook 7. H. 〈◊〉 â—ast leafe before any Indictment their Lands seized their goods taken the Law allowes a Traytor or Fellon attained Necessaria sibi familiae suae invictu vestitu where iâ— the Covenant Where is the Petition of Right Where is the liberty of the Subject First we have ayded the King in this Warre contrary to the Negative Oath and other Votes Our Warrant is the twenty fifth of Edward the third the second Chapter and the said resolutions of all the Judges Secondly 〈◊〉 Insâ—it a 25. a Instit 696 The Law so at the Edition of that booke Hutton and Crook we have maintained the Commission of Array by the Kings Command contrary to their Votes We are warranted by the Statute of the fifth of Henry the fourth and the judgement of Sir Edward Cooke the â—â—cle of the Law as they call him Thirdly we maintained Archâ— Bishoâ—â— and Bishops whom they would suppresse Our warrant is Magna-Charta and many Statutes more Fourthly we have maintained the Booke of Common mayâ—r they suppresse it Our warrant is five acts of Parliament in Edward the fixt and Queene Elizabeths time 5 Pelchae 35 Elizabeth inter placita Coronae in Banâ—â— Regis New booke of Entries fol. 252. Penry for publishing two scandalous Libels against the Church Government was indicted arraigned attainted and executed at Tyburne Fiftly we maintained the Militiâ—â— of the Kingdome to belong to the King they the contrary Our warrant is the Statute of the seventh of Edward the first and many Statutes â—â—thence
instit 110. 4 pars p. 49. that is the sence of the word Parler in the French Tongue The Writ whereby the two Houses are assembled which is called the Writ of Summons of Parliament at all times and at this Parliament used and which is the warrant ground and foundation of their meeting is for the Lords of the House of Peeres the Iudges and Kings Counsell to consult and treate with the King that is the Parler of great concernments touching 〈◊〉 the King secondly the defence of his Kingdome thirdly the defence of the Church of England It cannot be a Parliament that will not parle with their King but keepe him in prison and not suffer him to come to them and parle and therefore the Law and sense and reason informing every man that is no manner of parliament the King with whom they should parle being so restrained that they will not parle with him the army hath no manner of security by this Ordinance for their indemnification refers to that which is not in being untill the King be at Liberty 7. It is more than probable that their Iudges before the last Circuite had instructions to the effect of this Ordinance The Common souldiers second Apology 6. Grievances of the Army published 15. May last Three grievances of Col. Riches Regiment but they the Iudges making conscience of their Oath layd aside the said instructions and ought and may and it is believed will no more regard this Ordinance than the said instructions What was done in the last circuit the army well knowes touching many of their fellow Souldiers 8. The Hâ—uses in their first proposition to his Majesty for a safe and well-grounded peace sent to Newcastle to desire a pardon from his Majesty for themselves they who desire a pardon cannot granr a pardon comoÌ„n reason dictates this to every man and therefore that the army should accept an indemnity for them who seek it for themselves or should conceive it of any manner of force is a fancy so that no man in the whole army but may apprehend that it is vain and a meer delusion 9. His Majesty by his gracious message of the 12 of May last hath offered an Act of Oblivion and a generall pardon to all his people this done the Law doth indemnifie the Army without all manner of scruple for any thing that hath been done for it is an Act of Parl. when the King two houses concur and bindes all men I here is no safety by the Ordinance there is safety by an Act of Parliament and will not reasonable men preferre that which is safe before that which is unsafe 10. His Majesty by his said Letter agrees to pay the arrears of the army J am sure that it is a publick debt and the chiefest and the first that by the two Houses should be paid and before any dividend or gratuities bestowed among themselves for their blood limbs and lives have put and kept the both Houses at rest in the power they have So by this concurrence of his Majesty for your indemnity and for your arreares the Army have not an Ordinance or the Publick Faith but the Law of the Land to make sure unto them their indemnity for all acts and for their arrears and therewith also bring peace to the Land 11. The Kingdom and people generally desire these things To such an army just and reasonable things must not be denyed the things formerly proposed are most just and reasonable you may have them if you will if you will not you render this Kingdom miserable wherein you will have your share of miseries the head and the body are such an incorporation as cannot be disolved without the destruction of both The additionall Ordinance of both Houses passed the 5. of Iune instant for the fuller indemnity of the Army makes nothing at all to the matter 1. For that it extends not to Felony Homicide Burglary Robbery or any other cappitall crime which is the main businesse insisted upon and most concerneth the Souldiers security 12. The both Houses in the said additional Ordinance say Mr. Pyms Speech against tho Earl of Strafford p. 16. Six considerations printed by the command of the House of Commons that it is expedient that all offences be pardoned and put in oblivion pardon and oblivion cannot be understood to be for a time but for ever and they themselves confess that an Ordinance is not binding but pro tempore which with the most advantagious interpretation can be but a reprive or delay of the execution of the Law and therefore that cannot pardon or put in oblivion by their own shewing But the Law of the Land is and so it hath constantly been practised in all times that no persons of what estate soever 27 H. 8. c. 24. have any power to pardon treason felony or any other offences but the King only who hath the sole and whole power to pardon all such crimes whatsoever And in the same manner an Ordinance is of no authority at all to take away the right of private mens actions by any evidence it can give in truth all the evidence that this Ordinance gives is that it records to posterity nothing but a lawlesse and distempered time For remedy thereof I say again it is a certaine truth this Kingdom without an act of Oblivion and a general pardon and the payment of Souldiers-arrears and a meet regard had to tender consciences will unavoydably be ruined Iune 10. 1647. DAVID IENKINS Prisoner in the Tower of London Sundry Acts of Parliament mentioned and cited in the Armies Indemnities set forth in words at large for the better satisfaction of such as desire rightly to be informed 25. Edw. Chap. 5. A Declaration what offences shall be adjudged Treason WHereas divers opinions haue béen before this time in what case Treason shall be said and in what not The King at the request of the Lords and of the Commons hath made a Declaration in the manner as hereafter followeth That is to say When a man doth compasse or imagine the death of our Lord the King or of our Lady the Quéen or of the eldest Son and Heire or do violate the Kings companion or the Kings eldest Daughter vnmarried or the Wife of the Kings eldest Son and Heire or if a man do leavy War against the Lord our King in his Realm or be adherent to the Kings enemies in his Realm giuing to them ayd and comfort in the Realm or else-where and thereof be probably attainted of open deed by people of their condition And if a man counterfeit the Kings great or priuy Seal or his Mony and any man bring false mony into this Realm counterfeit to the mony of England and the mony called Lusburgh or other like to the said mony of England c. 11. Hen. 7. Chap. 1. None that shall attend upon the King and do him true service shall be attainted or forfeit any thing THE King our
Soueraign Lord calling to remembrance the duty of Allegiance of his Subjects of this his Realm and that they by reason of the same are bound to serue their Prince and Soueraigne Lord for the 〈◊〉 being in his Wars for the defence of him and the land against euery rebellion power might raised reared against 〈◊〉 and with him to â—â—er and abide in seruice in battell if â—ase so require and that 〈◊〉 the same service what fortune euer fall by chance in the same battel against the mind and will of the Prince as in this land sometime passed hath béen seen that it is not reasonable but against al laws reason good conscience that the said subjects going with their Soueraign Lord in Wars attending upon him in his person or being in other places by his coÌ„mandement within this Land or without any thing should lose or forfeit for doing their duty or seruice of Allegiance It be therefore ordained enacted and established by the King our Soueraign by the advice and assent of his Lords Spirituall and Temporall and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by authority of the same that from hence forth no manner of person or persons whatsoeuer he or they be that attend upon the King and Soueraign Lord of this land for the time being in his person and do him true and faithfull seruice of Allegiance in the same or be in other places by his commandement in his wars within this land or without that for the said déed and true duty of Allegiance he or they be in no wise convict or attaint of high treason nor of other offences for that cause by Act of Parliament or otherwise by any processe of Law wherby he or any of them shal lose or forfeit life lands tenements rents possessions heriditaments goods chattels or any other things but to bee for that déed and service utterly dischar ged of any vexation trouble or loss And if any Act or Acts or other process of the Law hereafter thereupon for the same happen to be made contrary to this Ordinance that then that Act or Acts or other process of Law whatsoever they shall be shall bee utterly voyd Prouided alwaies that no person or persons shall take any benefit or aduantage by this Act which shall hereafter decline from his or their said Allegiance Cap. 24. In the Statute of 27. H. 8. It is enacted that no person or persons of what estate or degrée soever they be of shall haue any power or authority to pardon or remit any Treason Murders Man slaughters or any other Felonies c. but that the King shall haue the sole and whole power and authority thereof united knit to the Imperiall Crown as of right it appertaineth c. And in the same Statute it is enacted further That none shal haue power of what estate degrée or condition soeuer they be to make Iustices of Eyre Iustices of Assize Iustices of Peace c but all such Officers and Ministers shal be made by Letters-Paâ—ents under the Kings great Seal in the name and by the authority of the King and his Heires Successors Kings of this Realm In the first ear of Queen Mary and the first Chapter It is enacted by the Quéen with the consent of the Lords Conmions That no déed or offence by act of Parliament made treason shall be taken deemed or adjudged to be â—igh Treason but only such as be declared and expressed to be Treason by the Act of Parliament made 25. Ed cap. 2. before mentioned A Declaration of Mr. David Jenkins now Prisoner in the Tower of London one of His Majesties Iudges in Wales for tryals of Treasons Murthers Felonies and all other capitall crimes that they ought only to be by Juries and not otherwise unless it be by Act of Parliament THe Common Law of this Land is that every Freeman is subject to a tryall by bill of Attainder in Parliament wherein His Majesty and both Houses must necessarily concur for that tryall and attainder is an Act of Parliament to which all men are subject to a Mag. Charta 19. 2 part inst fol 28 29.46 48 49 50. composed by Sir Ed. Cook and published by the Order of the House of Commons in May 1641. 4 pars instit fol. 41.356 No man shall otherwise be destroyed c. but by the lawfull judgement of his Peers or by the common Law of the Land Peeres to Noblemen are Noblemen Peeres to the ComoÌ„ns are Knights Gen c. Judgement of peers referres to peers those words The Law of the Land refers to the Commons the Law of the Land is for the tryall of the life of a free Commoner by indictment presentment of good and lawfull men where the deed is done or by Writ originall of the common Law all this is declared in Magna Charta c. 29 and by 25 Ed. 3. c. 4.28 Ed. 3. c. 3.37 Ed. 3 c. 8.42 Ed. 3. c. 3. If the Lords wil try any man by an Ordinance they destroy that excellent Act of Magna Charta and all those other good Laws Sir Simon de Bereford a free Commoner of England was condemned by the Lords to death by an Ordinance which after the Lords better considering the matter that they might be acquitted of that sentence became suiters to the King that what they had done in future time might not be drawn into president because that which they had done was against the Law b Rot. Par. roul 4. â— 2 Num. 2. part inst p. 50 with this agrees Sir Iohn Lees case Rot. Par. 42. â— 3. Num. 22.23 2. inst f. 50. with this agrees the practise and usage of all times in this Land all the free Commoners of this Kingdome hath alwayes been tryed and acquitted or condemned in capitall causes by Iurers of their equals An Ordinance bindeth not in Law at all c See 4. p. inst f. 23.48.232.298.292 2. p. inst f. 47 48.157.643 4. H. 7. faâ— 1. H. 7. f. 14.3 p. inst f. 41. and but pro tempore as the two Houses now affirme a man's life cannot be tried by that which is not binding and to continue for all times for a life lost cannot be restored By an Act of Parliament of the 1. 2. Philâ—p and Mary c. 10. It is enacted that all trials for Treason hereafter to be had shall be according to the course of the Common Law and not otherwise If the crime charged upon any be Treason against the two Houses against the Parliament it caannot be for there is no Parliament without the King That is no Treason in Law as appeares by 25. Ed. 3. c. 2. 11. R. 2. c. 3. 1. H. 4. c. 10. 1. 2 Philip and Mary c. 10. 3. part of the Institutes page 23 An Act of Parliament to make any a Iudge where he is party is a void act d Dr Bonams case 8. part of Cooks Reports for none can be a Iudge and party in the
proceribus c. King charles being to have conforence and Treaty with his Prelates and Peeres carolus Rex cannot have colloquium et tractatum Conference and Treaty when he is deceased 2 H. 5. Cook title Parl. 3. pars and therefore it is as impossible for any Parliament to continue as long as they please as for a Parliament to make a dead man alive For Repugnancy That which is but for a time cannot be affirmed to have continuance for even it is repugnant The end of the Act 17 Caroli Regis which is to continue at pleasure is in the said act expressed to be to raise credit for Mony for these three purposes First for relief of his Majesties Army and People in the North. Secondly for preventing the imminent danger of the Kingdome Thirdly for supply of other his Majesties present and urgent occasions These ends are ended the relief of that Army the imminent danger supposed was six yeares agoâ— the supply of his Majesty hath been a supply against Him take away the end the meanes thereto are to no purpose Sir Anthony Maines case 5. pars 1. H. 4.6 Littl. cap. Villen take away the cause the effect ceaseth and therefore the three ends of this Act being determined it agreeth with Law and reason the Act should end the Law rejects things unprofitable and uselesse A perpetuall Parliament besides that it incites men to selfe-ends destructive of the publique of which the whole Kingdom hath had sufficient experience will be a constant charge to the Kingdom for that every County and Borough who send Members to the Parliament are by the Law to pay Wages to their Parliament-men which to many Counties will amount above some Subsidies yearly there are many poor Borough-Towns in each County of this Kingdom who being to maintain two Burgesses in Parliament will be quickly beggered if the Parliament have no end for all which reasons it is clear that such long continuance of Parliaments will instead of a remedy which is and ought to be the proper and true ends of Parliament become an insufferable Grievance and Oppression to all the People of the Land The Writ of Summons this Parliament is the Basis and Foundation of the Parliament If the foundation be destroyed the Parliament falls The Assembly of Parliament is for three purposes Rex est habiturus colloquium tractatum cum Praelatis magnatibus et proceribus super arduis negotijs concernentibus 1. nos 2. Defensionem regninostri 3. defensionem Ecclesiâ—â—-Anglica nae This parliament hath overthrown this foundation in all three parts 1. Nos The King they have Chased him away and imprisoned him they have voted no prelates and that a number of other Lords about fourty in the City must not come to the House and about fourty more are out of Town the colloquium tractatus are made void thereby For the King cannot consult and treat there with men removed from thence 2. Defensionem regmâ—nostri that is gone they have made it their Kingdom not His for they have usurped all his Soveraignty 3. Defensionem Ecclesiae Anglicanâ— that is gone that Ecclesia Anglicana must be understood necessarily that Church that at the test of the Writ was Ecclesia Anglicana they have destroyed that too So now these men would be called a Parliament having abated quashed and made nothing of the Writ whereby they were summoned and assembled If the Writ be made void All the Processe is void also that House must needs fal where the Foundation is overthrown Sublaâ—o fundamentâ— opus cadit the foundation being taken away the work fals is both a Maxime in Law and reason For some years past there is no crime from treason to trespass but they are guilty of all treasons Felonies Robberies Tresspasses are câ—ntra pacem coronam dignitatem Regis against the Peace Crown and Dignity of the King as appeares by all Indictments in all Ages Pax Regis the Kings peace Corona Regis the Kings crown Dignitas Regis the Kings dignity are all trod under foot and made nothing Pax Regis the peace of the King is become a Warre against the King his Dignity put into Prison and the Crown put upon their owne heads All the Judges of England have resolved that Noble Men committing Treason have forfeited their office and Dignity Nevils case 7. part 34.2 Iac. their office is to councell the King in time of Peace to defend him in time of Warre and therefore those men against the duty and end of their Dignity taking not only councell but Armes also to destroy him and being thereof attaint by due course of Law By a tacit condition annexed to the estate of their dignity have forfited the same they are the words of the law and therefore they have made themselves incapable to be Members of the upper House The Oppressions of the People Briberies Extortions Monopolies ought to be inquired after by the House of Commons and complained of to the King and Lords What have they done The House of Commons cannot by the Law commit any man to prison who is not of the said House for Treason Murder or Fellony oâ— any thing but for the disturbance of the publique peace by the priviledge of the whole Body They have no power by the Writ which the King issueth to elect and returne Members of that house so to do For the Writ for them is onely ad faciendum consentiendum to those things where of his Majesty shal consult and treat with his Prelates and Nobles dâ— communi consilio regni shall be there ordained as appears by the Writ Here is no separate power given over the Kings people to them but only ad faciendum â—onsentiendum and in all times this â—â—th beene expounded and restrained to that which concerned their own Members in relation to the publique Service 4. pars inst 23 24 25. as they are Members of the corporate Body of the Parliament where of the King is the Head But that the House of Commons have commited any man for Treason Murder or Felony or for any offence that had no relation to a Member of the House of Commons as it is against Law and reason so no instance can be given till this Parliament All Questions and Tryalls where witnesse are examined 19. H. 6.43.22 E 4.22.5 H. 4. c. 8.3 H. 6.46 the Examination is upon Oath by the Law by all our Books Statutes every dayes practice Examination without an Oath is but a loose discourse therefore the House of Commons not claiming power to give Oath have no power to examine any man No man shall be imprisoned by the King or his Councell 25. E. 3. c 4. Petition of Right 3 Car. unles it be by indictment presentment of his good and lawfull Neighbours where such deeds be done in due manner or by process made by Writ original at the Common Law this Statute rehearses Magna Charta p. 29. expounds
and in laying Burdens upon the people and in breaking all the Oathes Vowes and promises they ever made As the Army hath power 2 3 E 6. c. 2. 11 H 7 c. 1. Calvins case 7. pars Cook fol. 11 so now adhering to the King all the Lawes of God Nature and Man are for them their Armies are just and blessed and the King is bound in justice to reward his Deliverers with honour profit and meere Liberty of conscience To the VI. Quaere All the sixth Quaere containes calumnies cast upon the Army the new Elections are against all the Lawes mentioned in the Margin and are against the Ejection of the old Members and by this it may be judged 11 M 4 c. 1 1-h 5 0 1.8 h 6 c. 7 23 h. 6 c. 15. what a House of Commons we have By the said Lawes it appeares that if any undue returne be made the person returned is to continue a Member the Sheriffes punishment is two hundred pounds one to the King and the other to the party that is duly elected Imprisonment for a yeare without Bail or mainprize and that person who is unduly returned shall serve at his own charge and have no benefit at the end of the Parliament by the Writ De solutione Militum Civium Burgensium Parliament And the trial of the falsity of the returne is to be before the Justices of Assizes in the proper county or by action of Debt in any Court of Record This condemnes the Committee for undue Elections 3. Ed. 4.20.5 Ed. 4.42 which hath been practised but of late times for besides these Lawes it is a-Maxime of the Common Law art Averment is not receivable against the returne of the Sheriffe for his Returne is upon Oath which Oath is to be credited in that Suit wherein the Returne is made The said Statutes condemne Elections of such men who were not resâ—ant and dwelt in the County or Boroughs for which they were returned and any abusive practise of late times to the contrary is against the Law and ought not to be allowed To the VII Quaere The Quaerist saith that the Votes of the Independents in the Houses were arbitrary exorbitant and irregular and that they disposed and singred more of the common Treasure than others That whole Quare I believe is false and slandeâ—ous and the Author ought to make it good or else to undergo the Law of Talnio 37. Ed. 5. c. 17. which is to suffer such punishment failing of his poof as the accused should in case of proofe made To the VIII Quaere This Quaere is all minatory and threatning and the contrary of every part is true by the deliverance of the King and Kingdom from the bondage of that party in the 2 Houses by the Army their renown will be eversasting they secure themselves they content and please the Kingdome City and Countrey as appeares by their confluence to see his Majesty and the Army and their acclamations for his Majesties safety and restitution all which doth evidence to every one of the army how acceptable the intentions of the Army are to the people of this Land who have been so long inthralled Sir Thomas Fairfaâ— let your Worthinesse remember your extraction and your Ladies by the grace and favour of the Prince to be in the ranke of Nobility Remember what honour and glory the present Age and all posterity will justly give to the Restorer of the King to his Throne of the Lawes to their strength and of the afflicted people of this Land to peace Let the Colonels and Commanders under You and likewise your Souldiery rest assured that they shall not only share in the renowne of this Action but also shall have such remuneration as their haughty Courage and so high a virtue doth deserve This his Majesty can and will do the Houses neither will nor can and God blesse you all and prosper you I Conclude all as I have alwayes done without an Act of Oblivion a generall pardon the arrears of the Souldiery paid and a regard to Liberty of conscience this Kingdom will certainly be ruined Iudge Ienkins PLEA delivered into the Earl of Manchester and the Speaker of the House of COMMONS Sitting in the CHANCERY at WESTMINSTER Which was read by their Command in open Court the 14th of Febr. 1647. And there avowed By DAVID IENKINS Prisoner in NEVVGATE LONDON Printed In the Yeare 1648. Judge Jenkin's PLEA Delivered in to the Earle of Manchester and the Speaker of the House of COMMONS sitting in the CHANCERY at WESTMINSTER I Have been required to appear in the Chancery the Twelfth of this instant February before Commissioners appointed by the two Houses for the keeping of their Great Seal and managing the Affaires of the Chancery I cannot nor ought nor will submit to this power I am a Judge sworne to the Lawes The Law is First that this Court is Câ—ram Râ—gâ— in Cancellaria 4 pars instfol 79 â— E 4 fol 5 â— E 4 f 15 Secondly the Chancellor or Keeper of the great Seale is by delivery of the Great Seale to him by the KING and by taking of an Oath The Oath followeth in these words 1. 42 pars inâ—â— 10 R 2 rot Parlanum â— Well and truly to serve our Sovcraigne Lord the King and his people in that Office 2. To do right to all manner of people poor and rich after the Laws and usages of this Realm 3. Truly to Counsell the King and his Coun cell to conceate and keep 4. Not to suffer the hurt or disheriting of the King or that the rights of the Crown be decreased by any means â—â—farre as he may let it 5. If he may not let it be shall maâ— it clearly and expresly to be knowne tâ— the King with his advice and counâ— sell 6. And that be shall do and purchase the Kings profit in all that he reasonably may as God him help and the contents of Gods book The said Commissioners among others have Imprisoned their King Declar. 17 Ian. 1647 have declared to the Kingdome that they will make no Addresses or Applications to him nor receive any from him Have counterfeited a new great Seal Articulisup chartrs c. 5 and after destroyed the true old great Seale which belonged by the Law to the Kings custody These Commissioners have had no Seale delivered to them by his Majesty have taken no such Oath or full ill kept it and for these evident reasons grounded upon the sundamental Lawes of this Land these Commissioner have neither Court Scale or Commission and therefore I ought not against â—he Lawes against my knowledg and against my conscience submit to their power To affirâ—e that they maintaine the Kings power and authority in relation to His Lawes as they often do and restraine only his person is strange They must be remembred that the House of commons this Parliament gave in charge to Mr. Solicitor upon the prosecution of the