Selected quad for the lemma: kingdom_n
Text snippets containing the quad
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
A15512
|
A modest briefe discussion of some points taught by M. Doctour Kellison in his treatise of the ecclesiasticall hierarchy. By Nicholas Smyth
|
Knott, Edward, 1582-1656.
|
1630
(1630)
|
STC 25779; ESTC S102767
|
83,544
|
218
|
Sacrifictâââtuââxhibedus estâ Vobiscum et not ââeebat pergere siliceret vs tali modo filios a patribus nulla necessit at separaret To whom do you leane vs maser able wretches whilst you goe to receaue your crownes Who shall giue vs the Sacrament of pennance and loose vs tyed with the bords of sinnes by the Indulgence of reconciliaââon For to you it was said whatsoeuer you shall loose vpoÌ earth it shal be loosed in heaneÌ Who shall bury vs with solemne prayers when we shall dy to whom the rite of the acuâââ sacrifice is to be exhibited We might haue gonne with you that so no necessâtâ might separate the children from their Fathers After this example M. Doctour sayth thus Wherefore aâ for otheâ poynts of our Fayth we must dye rather then deny them so we must dye rather then aâây the Hierarchy of the Church it being a poynt of Fayth 4 His third example is out of Orosius relating how the Aâian Tyrant Trâsamundus commanced that the African Bishops should not ordayne any more Bishops in the place of those that dyed Orosius ãâ¦ã â 10 The Bishops considering that without Bishops their churches could not long subsist but would fall without any other persecuââon or violence vsed against them resolued to call a Councell And in that Councell all the Bishops with one consâât decreed notwithstanding the Tyrants Edict to the contrary to ordaine Bishops Cogitantes aut regis iâ acundâam siqua forsan existeret mitigandam quo facilius ordinatâââsuis plebibus vâuerent aut si persecutionis violentia nasceretur coranaâdos etiaâ sides confessione quos dignos inuentebant promotione c. Thinking that the Kings wrath if any perchance should be would be mitigated or that they who were found worthy of promotion would be crowned with confessioâ of their ministerie And good reason had they so to doe For as sayth Baronius Quaenam shes de Ecclesiâs âastoribus destitutis vlterius reliqua esse poterat Baron An. Daâ 504. conuulsis earum fundameÌtis ipâis quibus initibantur Episcopis What hope could there remayne for the Churches when their foundations to wit the Bishops to which they leaned and on which they depended were ruined and pulled vp Thus farre out of M. Doctour whose words I hane related at large that the reader might see all the force of these examples and out of the narrations themselues gather the answeres to them 5 In this question certaine it is that de âure diuino the Church must be goueâned by Bishops that is in the whole Church of God there must be some Bishops but to affirme as M. Doctour doth that it is de iure diuino to haue a particular Bishop in the particular Church of England nââânely that there is such a precept but moreouer that hoe persecuioÌ can excuse the obligation therof or giue sufficieÌt cause of dispensation all which he must prooue if he will speake home is a paradox to speake sparingly without any shew of probability and which may seeme to taxe those Popes as ignorant of the deuine Law who for so many yeares esteemed it neither necessary nor expedient to send a Bishop into England neither when he was sent did they euer disputeâ whether it was necessary âure diuino but all the deliberation was quid expediret what was expedient yea M. Doctour must finally answere his owne arguments which either prooue nothing at all or else prooue that his Holinesse is obliged to give vs an Ordinary for his reasons and examples are for such which is more then M. Doctour himselfe will âuouch 6 And truly I cannot inâagine what way one should go about to prooue that vpon noe cause whatsoeuer the Pope can make himselfe particular Bishop of some particular Church especially for a tyme and gouerne it by his Delegates endued with sufficient power and still prouided that the sayd particular Church within or without it selfe haue meanes to be furnished with sufficient Priests and necessary Sacraments and helps 7 But although we should grant that as M. Doctour affirmeth a great or notable part of the church could not iuâre diuino be gourned without a Bishop yet that would be far from proouing that England as things now stand must needes haue a Bishop For if our country be considered not materially but formally as Deuines expresse themselues that is not the extent of land or multitude of people but the number of Catholickes which only can make a true church we shall find it to be more then far from a great or notable part of the Catholick church spred ouer the whole world And God grant that I might not with truth affirme the whole number of Catholicks in EnglaÌd ScotlaÌd also to be much lesse theÌ the nuÌber of people in some one citty in this Kingdom Sure I am that my Lord of Chaloâdon or some other in his behalfe in a certine writing called a Paralââ sect 4. saith that all the Catholicks would scarce make one of diuers Bishopricks in England Now to affirme that one Dicocesse or citty or indeede not so much as one Diocesse or citty is a great or notable part of that Church which reacheth as far as the rising and setting of the sunne and that it must therefore iure diuino haue a Bishop so as no cause can excuse the want of one is a thing that I will not say noe deuine but euen noe man in his right Iudgment can affirme But by this we may see into what absurdities partiality may lead men though other wayes learned 8 Enough hath bene said to disprooue M. Doctours Tenet in this present question yet nothing will more disaduââage his assertion then when the reader shall by my answers clearely peÌrceiue his owne arguments either to go beside the matter or to prooue against himselfe 9 His first was taken out of Sotus affirming it to be deiure diuiâe of the dideuine lawe quôd in genere singulis c. that in generâl to euery paâticular Church according to the Ecclesiasticall diuision proper Bishops are to be applyed This authority is eyther against M. Doctour or nothing against vs. For ether we suppose that the antient diuision of diocesses remaine âot in England and Scotland and then according to M. Doctours vnderstanding of Sotus euery Diocesse in England and Scotland must âure diuino haue a particular Bishop which is absurd could neuer be the true meaning of so learned a man as Sotus was Or els we suppose that al Ecclesiastical deuision of Diocesseâ in England hath ceased and then there is not by the deuine law due to England any Bishop according to this authority of Soto who only saith it is deiure diuino of deuine law that to euery particular Church proper Bishops are to be applyed according to the Ecclesiasticall deuision and therefore where there is no such diuision the wordes of Sotus haue noâ place so that Deuine as he is alledged by M. Doctour is aginst himselfe 10 If the Reader