Selected quad for the lemma: kingdom_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
kingdom_n head_n king_n lord_n 3,023 5 3.6782 3 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A47906 The reformed Catholique, or, The true Protestant L'Estrange, Roger, Sir, 1616-1704. 1679 (1679) Wing L1289; ESTC R20504 23,451 38

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

to his Majesty made a Man unfit for the Service of his Country He should have done well to have warn'd them against the Known Enemies of the Government rather then the Suspected Servants of the King The Free-holders Choice is a very Martin Mar-Prelate His Language against the Clergy is too coarse for an Honest man to repeat after him but he has rang'd them in good Company for he says that they lay out themselves to accommodate their Masters with the veriest Villains that can be pick'd up in all the Country that so we may fall into the hands again of as Treacherous and Lewd a Parliament as the Wisdom of God and Folly of Man has most miraculously freed us from Methinks some of the Members of that Parliament should concern themselves to call for Justice upon so foul a Scandal The Author of the Seasonable Quaeres does not only recommend the same Cautions with the rest but calls his Majesty himself to Shrift and puts the Question whether Prorogation and Dissolution of Parliaments at such a time as this does not fill the hearts of Protestant Subjects with evident fears of destruction And Secondly says he Whether it be not high time for all the Protestants in England to Resolve as one man that they will stand by and maintain the Power and Privileges of Parliament together with the Power and Just Rights of the King according to the Laws of the Kingdom so as the One may not intrench upon the Other The former Expostulation upon the Reason of the Kings Proceedings would have been more taken notice of perhaps if it had not been follow'd with one of the most Audacious Challenges that this Licentious season has produc'd for the meaning of it is to incourage a direct Rising as if the King and the Parliament were going together by the Ears forgive the Expression and the People to interpose to see fair Play This is the very Trace of the Old Covenant They must resolve to maintain no body knows what on the one side for the Privileges of Parliament are past finding out But then they are to stand by the King on the other side with a Limitation only in his Just Rights and of those Bounds they themselves are to be the Judges This Epithete was apply'd to the Late Kings Case by those very men that cut off his Head The Author of Englands great Interest having directed the Good People what persons to choose for the ensuing Parliament and whatnot His next work is to instruct them in the Knowledge of their Powers which he divides into three Rights or Fundamentals The First is Property that is a Right and Title to their own Lives Liberties and Estates For the Law he says is Umpire between King Lords and Commons and the Right and Property is one in kind through all Degrees and Qualities in the Kingdom Mark that Why does he not say that the King is Vmpire betwixt King Lords and Commons as well as that the Law is so For the Law is only the Kings Pleasure made known and the whole Force and Authority of it is but an Emanation from Soveraign Power And then for his Three Fundamentals As I am a Commoner of England my self I should be loth to lose any Right of an English man and yet as I am a Loyal Subject also I should be as unwilling to encroach upon the Privileges of the Crown I do not know what he means by his one in Kind with the Emphasis of Mark that upon it If it be that the People have as much Right to their Lives Liberties and Estates as the King himself has though it be true in some sense it will not hold yet as he would have it understood For the People may forfeit their Lives Liberties and Estates but the King cannot forfeit His Wherefore Mark That too His Second Fundamental is Legislation Or the Power of making Laws for no Law can be made or Abrogated he says in England without them It is not Candidly done to call that the very act of Legislation which is only Consultive and Preparative towards it The making of Laws is a Peculiar and Incommunicable Prerogative of Soveraignty so that to place the Legislative Power in the Commons is to make them Supream and to set a King of England once more at the Commons Bar. Beside that his Inference is as Inconsequent as his Assertion is Dangerous As if a Law must necessarily be made By th●m because it cannot be Made or Abrogated Without them Does he that furnishes the Ingredients therefore make the Medicine becau●e the Medicine cannot be made without the Ingredients What signifies the form of an Instrument to the passing of an Authority or Obligation without Signing and Sealing Yet the one cannot be done without the other Does the Councel that draws the Conveyance pass away the Estate because the Act could not have been good without him And again the Law in this Case is no other then a Promise under the Kings Hand past to the People and partakes of the Nature of other Promises It was made by the Promiser and cannot be discharg'd without the Consent of those to whom it was Promised His Third Fundamental is Executive and holds Proportion with the other two in order to compleat both their Freedom and Security and that is their share as he says in the Judicatory Power in the Execution and Application of those Laws that they Agree to be made A Judicatory Power without Authority to Minister an Oath is to me I must confess a new thing And now for the word Agree though it may be pertinent enough to his purpose for there needs no more to the Undoing of the most Regular Government upon the face of the Earth then First to turn the Peoples hearts against it and then to possess them that they have a Legal Remedy in their Own hands Yet that word I say in this place is very improper for it is but a Request presented to his Majesty for his Approbation The Request or Bill is no doubt agreed upon but it were an Uncouth kind of expression for a Petitioner to say that he does Agree that his Petition shall be Granted The Business it fairly push'd already But the Publisher of a Pretended Speech lately Printed carries it a step further If a Prince says he be Born to a Kingdom who is either Lunatique or otherwise disabled to do the Kingdom any good shall not the Subjects in this Case proceed to chuse another who may preserve the Kingdom when otherwise it must of necessity Perish As lately in the Case of Portugal they chose another to Succeed because of the Disability of the former This is in plain terms a Deposing Principle For if a King may be Remov'd in such Case of Disability the People being made Judges of the Case it is but their saying that he is not sit to Govern and the work is done There is a Sheet Printed under the Title of A Plea c.
Spottswood observes gave him more quiet and security for the future His Majesty was no sooner enter'd upon the Government of England but he was Assaulted in 1604. with the same sort of People and at a Conference at Hampton Court this Question was put How far an Ordinance of the Church was Binding without offence to Christian Liberty Whereupon the King gave this short Answer Let 's have no more of these Questions but Conform at your Peril So that they gave him no further trouble upon that subject And this was Queen Elizabeth's Case too to the hazard both of her Life and Government till by that severe Act against them of the Thirty-fifth of her Reign she gave her self ease for the remainder of her Life What did the Late King gain by his Indulgence to the Scots in 1637. but farther Indignities and Contempt First the Service-Book and Canons were their Grievance then the Five Articles of Perth though establish'd both by the General Assembly and Parliament The High-Commission next and then the Bishops Session in Civil Judicatories His Majesty gratifies them in every point Insomuch that they had nothing further to complain of but that the King would not Abolish Episcopacy and admit the Authority of their Lay-Elders upon which point they brake out into an Open Rebellion After this upon the Interview of the two Armies at Berwick when the King had them absolutely at his Mercy upon their Supplication for a Treaty he Trusted them again and concluded upon a Pacification of which the Covenanters did not keep so much as one Article Upon his Majesties Return to London he passes the Triennial Bill Abolishes the Star-Chamber and High-Commission-Court Passes an Act for the Continuance of the Parliament and in fine denys them nothing but his Crown and his Blood and then by Virtue of what he had given them already they took away the rest and stript him of his Friends his Authority his Revenue and his Life They minister great cause of suspicion in their very stile and scruples Why do they run so much upon Ambiguities As the settling of Religion in its due Latitude a due and necessary Reformation sound Belief Principles Congruous to a National Settlement the Kings Just Rights Importance of Interests Stated Order in the Church c. What is all this but a jumbling together of so many Amusements to pass a Colourable Pretence upon the People And it signifies just nothing but what Construction they shall think fit to allow it If they would offer any Pertinent Intelligible and Practicable Proposition and say what Injunctions they would have abated what Parties they would recommend for these qualifications where to find them and who shall judge of them If they would State their Demands and say This is all we ask and then rest there If as they plead for all Dissenters they would produce some Common Instrument or Commission to shew that they are Authoriz'd by all to Solicite in their Names and to treat upon such or such Points and to go no further the business might be brought yet to some rational Issue As their Stile is exceeding Dark and Mysterious so are their Scruples of an Extraordinary Quality too They cannot kneel at the Sacrament but they can hold up their hands at the Covenant they can dispense with the Oath of Allegeance and yet make a scruple of disclaiming the Solemn League They can swallow a Schism or worse and yet a Ceremony choaks them Add to all this many of those very persons that promoted our former Troubles this very way are now at work again upon the same Pretension and may without breach of Charity be suspected to have the same design and to remain in a state of Impenitency if they have not manifested their Repentance by some Open Recantation For according to the Casuists Publique sins require Publique Confessions It is an Ill sign too for a man to leap upon the sudden from matter of Conscience to Reason of State and in the same breath of a Petitioner to become a Reformer It would seem a strange thing for a man to request a special favour from the Master of a Family and at the same time to put affronts upon his Domesticks and to tell him that his Servants were all of them a pack of Rascals which is not much from the point now in hand We have had abundance of Advice to the Free-holders of England toward the Choice of this next Parliament as Sober and Seasonable Quaeres Englands great Interest the Free holders Choice and twenty more and all of them agreeing in the general Heads one with another They tell us who are fit to be chosen and who not The former such as will remove and bring to Justice evil Counsellors Corrupt and Arbitrary Ministers of State Detect and Punish the Pensioners of the former Parliament in the face of the Kingdom and they must chuse such as will secure us from Slavery The People are directed on the other side not to chuse a man that has been reputed a Pentioner no Court-Officer or whose Employment is durante bene placito no Ambitious men or Non-residents that live here in Town and seek Honours and Preferments above This is the Counsel of Englands Grand Interest And methinks in these Qualifications there is both too much and too little As to the point of Evil Counsellors Corrupt Ministers and Pensioners he should have done well to have advis'd them all manner of Caution and Circumspection for fear of mistaking their Men. This was the way that brought the Earl of Strafford and the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury to their Ends under the Notion of evil Counsellors too though perhaps the most necessary Instruments that ever this Nation enjoy'd for the Common good both of King and People So that as it is a great Service to bring Corrupt Ministers to Publick Justice it is yet a lewd Method to make the Rabble the Executioners and to punish Male-Administration by Sedition For in this Case the Good and the Bad fall indifferently without distinction and instead of drawing here and there a piece of Rotten Timber toward a Reparation they fall foul upon the main Pillars and Supporters of the House so that all falls into Ruins And then the mark of a Reputed Pensioner goes a little too far for it lies in the power of two or three Malevolent Tongues to make any man so They that made the last King a Reputed Papist shall much more easily make any of his Majesties Subjects pass for Reputed Pensioners The total Exclusion of all Court Officers or Bene-placito-men is yet worse For this sets up a direct Opposition betwixt the King and his People as who should say Trust no body that wears any Token of the Kings favour And the same reason disables him as well to any other Trust whatsoever So that the Kings Countenance is a kind of Incapacity And it is the same thing with those he calls Ambitious Men as if any Application