against them for they are full of them But I would they could get them out of the Schools of the Jesuits and come and learn the Doctrine of the Reformed Churches which speak thus Wee on the contrary maintain that Obedience to Kings and Magistrates is of Divine right and founded upon an Ordinance of God for which purpose those passages serve which commands obedience to Kings and the higher Powers as to Persons whom God hath set up and whom we cannot resist without resisting God There is no power but of God the powers that be are ordained of God whosoever therefore resisteth the power resisteth the Ordinance of God Rom. 13.1 2. Item We must be subject not only for wrath but also for Conscience sake V. 5 7. And Saint Peter in that place they object against us wills that we yield our selves Subjects to Kings for the Lords sake So that although Nebuchadnezzar was a wicked King and a Rod in the hand of God to destroy the Nations notwithstanding God speaks thus to him by his Prophet Daniel Thou O King art a King of Kings for the God of Heaven hath given thee a Kingdom power strength and glory Dan. 2.37 Moses the first Prince Lawgiver of Israel was established by an Ordinance of God and Joshua after him Num. 27.18 Saul the first King of Israel and David his Successor were anointed by Samuel and consecrated to be Kings according to the Ordinance of God 2 Kings 9. God sent to Jehu a Prophet for to anoint him King of Israel It s God that girdeth the loins of Kings with a girdle Job 12.18 God is he that governs or as our Translation read it God is the Judge he pulleth down one and setteth up another Psal 75.7 The Lord raiseth the poor out of the dust and lifteth the needy out of the dunghil that he may set him with Princes Psal 113.7 8. Certainly if the providence of God extends it self even to the feeding of Fowls and giving food to the young Ravens when they cry unto him Psal 147. Yea as to number the very hairs on your head so that not one of them falls without his Providence who believes that when God will establish or set up a man on the top of mankind and make him Head of Millions of people the counsel of God doth not intervene and that he leaves not all things to go at adventure and by chance The reasons they alledge against so evident and apparent a truth are lame and interfere 1. They say that Nimrod the first King in the World was raised by violence But that is false that before Nimrod there was no Soveraign Prince in the World Before Nimrod the Fathers and Heads of Families were Kings and Priests and Soveraign Princes of their Families For after the Flood men lived five or six hundred years So that it was easie for one man to behold five hundred yea a thousand persons of his Posterity over whom he exercised a paternal power and by consequence a Soveraignty for there was no other form of Royalty in the earth whose children servants being joyned together one Family could make a great Commonweal And even in the time of Abraham then when the life of man was shorter we read how Abraham was called by the Children of Heath a Prince of God Gen. 23.6 that is to say a mighty Prince and of his own Family he drew out three hundred and eighteen Souldiers to whom if we joyn the Maid-servants and those servants who were not fit to bear arms in war ye cannot but confess that although he had no children yet his own Family were capable to fill a good Town 2. They object to us also that the most part of the Empires and Kingdomes have had their beginning by Conquest and violence and therefore not by the Ordinance of God And that if the Conqueror had invaded the Country of another by the Ordinance of God the Inhabitants of the Country had offended God in opposing and resisting him Upon which I say that those Inhabitants in a Country whom a strange Prince will invade do well to oppose and resist him and if in this defensive war the Usurper is slain he is justly punished But if he become Master of them and if all the ancient Possessors of the Kingdome are extinguished and the States of the Country assembled contrive a new form of State and all the Officers throughout the Kingdome give to the new King an Oath of Fidelity then we must believe that God hath established such a Prince in the Kingdome then I say the people ought to submit to the Will of God who for the sins of Kings and People transfers Kingdomes and disposeth of the events of Battels according to his good pleasure 3. It matters not to say that Princes who enter Kingdomes by Hereditary Succession or by Election come in by wayes introduced by Custome and not by the Ordinance of God For the Question is not by what wayes or means a Prince comes to the Kingdome but whether if being once established by the Ordinance of God we are bound to obey him Our Adversaries indeed would have the Power of Parliament of Divine Right although the Members of Parliament enter by Election and oft-times by close and under-hand dealing and by some crafty Caballe Let them hold that the Parliament is by Divine Right it appears by their authentique Catechisme that they teach us this Doctrine Page 5. It 's a gross error to say that the King is the Supreme Power but that power appertains to the Soveraign Court of Parliament which not to obey is to resist the Ordinance of God But let us hearken to a better Author 4. That if there be no Command in the Word of God to obey Henry rather then Lewis c. It 's sufficient that there is a command for to obey the King and a command to keep our Oath and Fidelity we have sworn and by consequence to be faithful to the King to whom we have taken the Oath of Allegiance There is no more command of God found to injoyn us particularly to obey the Parliament that began November the third 1640 to which nevertheless our adversaries accounted themselves to be subject by Divine Right So that if this consideration should take place it would follow that none of them that are now in the world are obliged by Divine Right to fear God or to believe in Jesus Christ because the Scripture hath not particularly appointed Thibalt Antony or William that they should fear God and believe in Jesus Christ It sufficeth that the Word of God contains Rules which bind particulars without naming them S. Peter truly in the place before cited calls the obedience we owe to Kings a humane Ordinance and that either because Kings command many things which in their nature are not of Divine Right as their commands which forbid wearing of gold or silver or the like things on their apparrel or because they attain this
found it good since it had been easie for him to have raised mighty Armies being designed the Successor of Saul in the Kingdom for people naturally adore the Rising Sun David retired into Keilah and having heard that Saul had an intention to come thither to take him enquired of the Lord if those in the City would deliver him up to Saul and God having answered him that they would deliver him fled from thence the Ministers therefore of the Covenant infer that David had a desire to fortifie Keilah and to endure a siege But all which they can gather from that Passage is that David was not safe in that retreat and that God advised him to seek another for the Inhabitants of Keilah might have delivered him to Saul without attending a siege but when they shall have proved that David would have fortified Keilah it makes nothing for them since God declares by his Answer that it was not pleasing to him We would beseech the Gentlemen of the Covenant to hold themselves to this example which they have chosen that they would cashier their great Armies for David had but a few people with them 1 Sam. 25.16 that they would not rob the Subjects of their King of their Goods but imitate the Souldiers of David who were a wall both by night and day to the Flocks and Herds of Nabal That having seized upon the Arms of the King let them peaceably restore them again as David and not with the points forward Let their Conscience strike them and make them cry out The Lord forbid that I should do this thing against my Master the Lords Anointed for who can stretch forth his hand against him and be guiltless Words which beside the example carry with them a perpetual and express command and shall one day be produced in judgment against those that defend the late Commotions by the example of David and if their continuance in the Kingdoms of his Majesty is either displeasing or dangerous to them in stead of opposing him let them retire into some strange Country as David did to King Achis let them also imitate his sincerity in making use of strangers onely for his protection and not to invade his Country and raise his Subjects against their King which is that use the Covenanters imployed the Scots In one point onely they imitate and surpass David in that he fained himself a Fool for they indeed act the Fools in good earnest In brief the Example of David which they alledge is so contrary to the Actions of the Covenanters that they have great reason to fear least God alledge this at the dreadful day of Judgement against them saying Out of thy own mouth will I judge thee then wicked servant Luke 19.22 The other passages of Scripture are most ridiculously alledged and serve only to shew their great weakness They bring the action of the Army of Saul that saved Jonathan against the Oath of his Father 1 Sam. 14.45 but to what purpose is this Doth this Army draw their sword against the King Use they any violence either against his Person or Estate If a Kiâ—g would put to death his Innocent Son those faithful Subjects whom the King employs in this Execution do well not to do it and to refuse giving obedience to so unjust a command They make use also of the example of Ehud who slew Eglon King of Moab who kept the Israelites in slavery Judg. 3.21 we have often heard this example pressed with much vehemency in Pulpits The Preachers compared Eglon to the King affirming that Eglon was the lawful King of Israel and that it is lawful to kill a legitimate King if he oppress the people of God all this is false and proper to be refuted only by the Hangman to whom we leave them The Example follows of the City of Libnah which appertained to the Levites which revolted from the obedience of Jehoram because saith the Text he had forsaken the Lord God of his Fathers the Covenanters apply the word Because to the intention of the Inhabitants of Libnah and not to the judgement of God whence these Gentlemen conclude That it is lawful for the people to shake off the yoke of their Prince when the Prince forsakes God of which they will be Judges Although Libnah should revolt for this reason yet it follows not that the reason is of strength or that it ought to be turned into example a thing which requires a new proof of Scripture but the drift of the Text is to assign the cause of this revolt to the Justice of God and not to that of men Take the whole Text 2 Chron. 21. â—0 So the Edomites revolted from under the hand of Judah unto this day The same time also did Libnah revolt from under his hand because he had forsaken the Lord God of his Fathers Having consulted with the Original we find that the revolt of Edom and of Libnah were both together without the least distinction but between the discourse of these two Revolts and the reason adjoyned there is there the usual mark for the distinction of half periods which shews that this reason serves equally for both the Revolts and the sense of the Text carries it evidently that the Idumeans and those of Libnah revolted for the same cause and that these Idumeans which were Idolaters had no ground to revolt from the King of Judah because at that time he was also fallen into Idolatry it s therefore the Divine justice that the Text regards and not the Motives of second Causes Also the same Author saith that Pekah the Son of Remaliah slew in Judah 120000 in one day which were all valiant men because they had forsaken the Lord God of their Fathers In these two passages the sense is alike and the reason of the punishment couched in the same terms now it s most evident that the Syrians had no Quarrel against the Jews for forsaking God because they did not believe in him wherefore we are to look to Justice of the King of Kings who for the sins of Princes suffers them to lose the obedience of their Subjects for God serveâ— himself of the wickedness of men whereof he is not the cause for to execute his just judgments but that excuseth not the Rebellion of Subjects for it is their part to consider what they owe to their King and not what their King deserves of the Justice of God They add the example of Jehu who exterminated the King of Israel and all the posterity of Ahab 2 Kings 9. in which wiâ—hout doubt he did very well because God commanded him but the Covenanters did very ill in persecuting their King because God had forbidden them After this they bring the Execution of the Queen Athaliah by the Command of Jehoâ—adah the High Priest 2 Chron. 26.18 which no more then the former toucheth the Question for not only Jehoâ—adah but all other people might have done as much because there was a lawful
it was they made the people believe a long time that the occasion of their taking up Arms was to bring the King to his Parliament but the hypocrisie of protestation is now clearly manifested for when the King offered to return to his Parliament they utterly refused to receive him telling him plainly if he came he should come at his peril Forbidding all persons whatsoever under pain of death to receive or entertain him in their houses Let all good subjects who have taken this Oath open now at last their eyes and acknowledge that the intentions of their Guides was quite contrary to their professions The Sixth Article required every person to swear That this cause touched the Glory of God the happiness of the three Kingdomes and the Dignity of the King Indeed this cause touched the Glory of God with such fowl hands as have defiled it as much as possible men could and it touched the happiness of the three Kingdomes with such malignant claws as have torn them to pieces But if they will that we take them in their sense namely that their cause defends and advanceth the Glory of God the happiness of the Kingdomes and the Dignity of the King we behold and feel the contrary But grant that this should be true 't is not a thing for which we must swear Oaths are of two sorts the one sort are to affirm the truth of a thing present or past the other for to promise and oblige our will for the future these two sorts of Oaths cannot be taken together The Oath of the Covenant is of the latter and therefore it is very ill done of them to confound it with the first which is altogether of another nature and usage and in a promise for the future to thrust in an affirmation of a thing present yea of a thing false or at least doubtful and whereof they of their party are not accorded But suppose that this Oath were of the first sort the things which we should affirm upon Oath are such as require the testimony of the person who swears Such are all questions of fact But as for questions of right they ought not neither can they be decided by Oath and it is to want common sense to make his neighbour judge to know which is the true Religion and to judge whether the Cause of the Parliament is better then the Kings There the Oath loseth his use for it s made to perswade and give Authority to the thing by the witness of the person If the Cause of the Covenant be the Cause of God there is no need to swear it but to justifie it by reason and practice And although we should even believe that it searcheth and advanceth the Glory of God the happiness of the Kingdome and dignity of the King it were unjust and ridiculous to press us to swear it for moral truths and even also Theological ought to be believed not sworn Civil things only and those amongst them which are matters of fact ought only to be affirmed by oath we have a very firm belief of the truth of many points of Religion and of the honesty of divers persons and yet nevertheless for all the world we would not swear to them all who have any ingenuity or good sense acknowledge that to force us to affirm the goodness of the Covenant by Oath is an extreme tyranny and full of ignorance and absurdities And also seeing we are very ill satisfied of the goodness thereof it s another tyranny to make us swear to defend it and a most barbarous cruelty to confiscate our possessions and sequester our Ministers of their benefices because they refuse to take so unreasonable an Oath and yet all this was practised during the Presbyterian Reign The Articles of the Covenant were assisted with a Religious Prologue and Epilogue full of protestations of zeal and repentance and therefore it was almost impossible but the most part of them that took it should be perjured considering the generality of the people are evil And this should have prevented the Gentlemen to impose the Covenant indifferently upon all under such great penalties For as they will not suffer the Sacrament of the Lords Supper to be administred to the people for fear to encrease their condemnation They should have by the same reason according to their principles have withheld to administer these protestations of zeal and repentance to their consciences whose disposition they were ignorant of Now a great evidence of their depraved and evil Faith consists in their protestations of sanctity and superlative expressions of zeal in which the Independent party who rejected the Covenant without comparison fly higher then their Predecessors All their Ordinances and Declarations yea even their Letters of News were sallies of zeal All their murthers and robberies were to establish the purity of the Gospel to conquer a Kingdome for Jesus Christ and that godliness might reign and flourish If they speak of the abominable parricide committed against their Soveraign they say that God made bare the Arm of his Holiness that the Lord is on their right hand that he hath smote Kings in the day of his wrath and that they may wash their feet in the blood of the ungodly Thus they made their horrible crimes march disguised in terms of Scripture and the devil borrowed the language of the Spirit of God Whosoever shall well consider the use they made of the Scripture and whereto they imployed their great shew of holiness shall find an Answer to the Question in the 50 Psal 16. But to the wicked God saith what hast thou to do to declare my Statutes or that thou shouldest take my Covenant in thy mouth Behold here the work of the Covenanters they declare the Statutes of God and take his Covenant into their mouths to put on rebellion the mask of Religion and to invest themselves without trouble of the Authority and Revenues of the Crown the goods of the Church and without suspition to grope the purses of the people for the outward shew of devotion doth much amuse the assistants and gain their belief for who can fear any evil from those who so piously invite them to repentance and the advancement of the Glory of God who would not confide and trust in them that declare the Statutes of God and take his Covenant in their mouth Satan in all forms is dangerous but he is never so pernicious as when he clothes himself as an Angel of Light and it is ill going Procession when the Devil carries the Cross Moreover by their fruits ye shall know them How often abused they the credulity of the people when they conjured them to help to fetch the King from his evil Councellors and to bring him gloriously to his great and faithful Councel that is to say to themselves but their faithfulness appeared then when he departed from them whom they called his evil Councellors to yeeld himself up to them for then their terrible
deny but the defenders of this pernicious Doctrine were the chief of their New Reformation and the Authors of the war people whose Counsels were applauded as Oracles and who drew after them their party by the repetition of their sanctified strength of zeal those who dared to contradict them did it very fearfully and kissing their hands before they spake but they themselves carried all before them acting with a prophetick liberty and boldness also after all they only were the men to be trusted and who were put upon all great designs and employments for they feared that they who are less governed by Enthusiasms might at last so far forget themselves as to be faithful to their Sovereign and yield to a peaceable accomodation Behold here then wherefore we would not joyn our selves with these Reformers because we see that even they themselves have the greatest need of Reformation being far gone from the Doctrine of the reformed Churches erring in the Faith but yet more in Charity It 's they would sweep the Church as God swept Babylon with the Beesom of destruction They speak not of reforming neither Doctrines nor Manners but to ruine the Persons They account the most part of the Clergy of the Kingdom unworthy to be corrected but altogether to be rooted out that one part of the Reformation was to ruine the King and to take the sword from his side to cut off his head the favourers of tumults were the only persons that were caressed they lent their ears to the populâ—r tumults whilst they shut the mouths and bound the hands of the Magistrates It was they taught that the people were above the King and that the Command of Saint Paul that every one should be subject to the higher Powers obligeth the King for to obey the People it was they that upheld yea favoured and courted all sorts of pernicious Sects provided that they would bandy with them against their King It was they that suffered to go unpunished the Blasphemies in the Pulpits the Insolencies Sacriledges and horrible profanations of the Service of God and permitted all things to those who were of the zealous party We beheld on the other side that the King took knowledge of the grievances of his people as well for the spiritual as temporal and laboured sincerely to remedy them that he consented to the alteration of offensive things in Religion and to the punishment of those who were accused as troublers of the Church provided that the things and persons were examined by regular and lawful waies of a general Synod which he offered to assemble he also was pleased to yield of his own right to augment the rights of his Subjects and daily multiplied acts of favour capable to convert the most alienated spirits passed by the many and great affronts that were done to his authority and endeavoured by all waies possible to overcome evil with good But the more the King yielded the more insolent were the factious against him he offered to reform both the State and Church but they would not permit him they themselves would do that work without him The King sent divers messages to know of them what things they would reform but to this they answered only with complaints Neither could he obtain any declaration of that which they desired until that his Forts Magazines Ships and Revenues were taken from him the reason of which hath since been given by one of their principal Champions Having to sow the Lords Field they had need to make a fence about it before they begin that the work-men might labour without interruption and that to lance the Apostume of a sick State they must first bind the Patient Our Conscience could not accomodate it self to this prudence neither ever expect any good from such a way of Reformation which would bind the Royal hands and feet of Majesty before they would declare what they desired of his Favour and cut asunder the Nerves of his Authority and subsistance under colour to establish the Kingdom of Jesus Christ A strange proceeding to us that have learned of St Paul that a Prince beareth not the sword in vain Rom. 13.4 But in that is the Minister of God to execute wrath and that to resist him yea when he should make use of the sword to commit injustice is to resist the Ordinance of God But if he use it well or ill that ought to be left to him who gave it him and to whom only he ought to render account his Subjects ought to counsel him if he did ill and refuse to assist him in evil doing and not repress him by Arms That if this Command of St Paul obliged the Romans to obey a cruel vicious Prince and enemy to God we should account our selves much more bound to obey a just merciful religious Prince whose life was a rare example of piety and sanctity and his Government so just and peaceable that he might well be called the Father of his Subjects who wanted nothing to make them happy but to know their happiness CHAP. II. That the Covenanters are destitute of all Proofs from Holy Scripture for their War made against the King THese violent beginnings of the Covenanters and their Progress also which overthrows all humane Authority had great need to strengthen it self by Divine Authority to satisfie the Conscience whence is it that they made a great noise of it in their Pulpits but not in their Disputes for those that exhorted the people in Scripture-term to War against the King hang down the head when in conference their Proofs are demanded saying that It is not for Divines but Lawyers to decide the present quarrel Whence it appears that there is a great difference betwixt the terms and proofs of Scripture and that many that have the voice of the Lamb speak as the Dragon But fearing lest they should accuse us that we suppress their proofs behold here all that they make use of both in their Books and Sermons part borrowed from the writings of the Jesuites and part from two Books which are Printed with Machiavels Prince and not without great reason for there are three wicked Books together and its a wonder how that in threescore years their Books have not been burnt for company by the hands of the common Executioner They alledge the example of David who had six hundred men for his guard when he was pursued by Saul 1 Sam. 22.2 The example of the Army of Israel which saved Jonathan when Saul would have put him to death 1 Sam. 14.45 Of Ehud who slew Eglon King of Moab an Oppressor of the Israelites Judg. 3.21 The example of the Town of Libnah which revolted from the obedience of Jehoram because he had forsaken the Lord God of his Fathers 2 Chr. 21.10 Of Jehu that cut off the House of Ahab 2 Kings 9. The example of Jehojadah the High Priest who commanded Athaliah the Queen to be put to death 2 Kings 11.15 Of the Priests
was under age caused the Father to be most cruelly put to death in prison yet the authority of the young K. must be made use of to make the resolution of the Parliament pass into an Act for without the King the Parliament can no more act than a Body without a Head But when the young King came to age he caused the Authors and Complices of his Fathers death to be executed and caused all the Acts of this Parliament to be broken by another And less than these to the purpose is which they alledg concerning the accord the Barons extorted from King John by which this unhappy and imprudent King being reduced to a straight promised to put himself into the power of twenty five of his Barons and submitted himself to divers other dishonorable Conditions and this accord was not made in Parliament but in the field by force of Arms there being no Parliament then sitting and therefore was of no force nor was ever kept These Articles of the Barons were much like those the two Houses sent the King to Beverly Oxford and New-Castle the Covenanters imitate these Barons in their affectation of Piety for they called their General the Marshal of the Lords Army and of his holy Church and these perswaded their Chiefs that they led the Battels of the Lord of Hoasts but these transferred not the Crown to another Prince as the Barons did but have taken away both his Crown and Life having long before declared by writing to their King that they dealt very favourably with him if they did not depose him and that if they did they should not exceed the Limits of Modesty nor of their Duty This Judgment was pronounced in the House of Commons without contradiction that The King might fall from his Office that the happiness of the Kingdom did not depend upon him nor the Royal Branches of his House and that he did not deserve to be King of England The Authors of these Opinions are declared in a Declaration of his Majesties In one point the Barons and Covenanters are very different for the Lords that remained with the Covenanters were without power all places of Honour and Trust being taken out of their hands by their Inferiours and at last their House abolished by the Commons so that in stead of producing this War of the Barons the Covenanters should rather have alledged the Seditions and Commotions of Watt Tyler and Jack Straw poor Artisans and followed with people of the same rank for these persons and the Cause of the Covenanters are far more alike Behold here with what authorities the Margins of their Books are stuffed Behold the Examples which the polititians of the times present to the Gentlemen of the Parliament for to teach them what they ought to do those infamous actions which were abhorred by the ages following them are become the supporters of ours and despair which makes men snatch up any sorts of weapons forceth our enemies to justifie their actions by the examples of Rebels and Paricides 't is not for nothing then that these Histories are so often alledged though nothing to the purpose and it 's not without cause that they print them apart for not being able to justifie their actions they have declared their intentions and made the King to see what he sholud trust to if he fell into their hands Certainly if there had not been a design laid to come to that both to prepare the people and intimidate the King those incendiaries who by these horrible examples and their Maximes of State grounded thereupon teaching the deposing of Kings should have been hanged long since with their Books about their necks For so many men which are studied in the Laws of the Kingdom and are at the helm of affairs cannot be ignorant of that which King James of happy and glorious memory marks in his Book of the Right of Kings that in the time of Edward the Third there was an Act of Parliament made which declared all them Traytors who imagined it's the word of the Law or conspired the death of the King â—on which Act the Judges grounding themselves have alwaies judged them for Traytors who dared but to speak of deposing the King because they believed that they could not take away the Crown from off the Kings Head without taking away his Life It was heretofore a crime worthy of death to speak yea to think evil against the King and moreover the Word of God which is to be obeyed forbids us to speak evil of the King no not in our thought but now it 's the exercise of devout Souls to write Meditations upon the deposing of their King CHAP. VII Declaring wherein the Legislative Powers of Parliament consists HAving no better Authorities in all the Examples of the Ages past they establish a New one which by the unlimited largeness supplies what it wants of length of time for when we require to be governed by the Laws they answer us that the Parliament is the Oracle of the Laws that it is for that great Court to declare what is Law and what is not to interpret the Laws to dispense with them or to make new ones That themselves are the Parliament excluding all others and that since they have declared that this War is according to Law and that such Maximes as they give us are fundamental Laws of the Kingdom we must remit our selves to them and receive for Law what they ordain But because strangers may read who have no knowledge of the Government of England for to examine this Imperious reason we are obliged to declare here what we know touching the present affairs We have learned to acknowledg the Parliament 〈◊〉 England for the Supream Court of the Kingdom that can make and unmake Laws and from whose Judgment there is no appeal But of this Court the King is the principal part and it 's he that renders it soveraign the two Houses in all their Legislative Acts acknowledg him their true and sole Soveraign the House of Lords only can evert the Judgment of the Courts of Justice but not their own without the consent of the King and the House of Commons the House of Commons is not a Judicial Court having not power to administer an Oath inflict a Fine or imprison any but those of theâ—r own House and these two neither apart nor together cannot make a Law but when they would enact any thing they both together present a Writing to the King in form of a request if the King approves of them the Lord Keeper of the Great Seal answers for the King in these French words Le Roy le veult and then it is made an Act but if the King refuseth it he returns answer Le Roy S'avisera and the business passeth no further Before the consent of the King the proposition of the two Houses contained in the Writing is like unto that which the Romans called Rogatio but when the King grants it
they may then give it the name of Lex and in effect it is but a request before the pleasure of the King makes it pass into a Law and was never other before this present Parliament Therefore the English Lawyers call the King the life of the Law for though the King in Parliament cannot make any Law without the concurrence of the two Houses yet nevertheless it 's his Authority only that gives it the strength and Name of a Law and they are so far from having any Legal Authority in their Commands without the consent of the King that the customary right gives them not so much as a Name neither takes any Cognisance of them To say then that the Parliament hath declared this War lawful and that the Orders of Parliament are Laws is by an ambiguous term to abuse the ignorance of the people for by the Parliament they understand somtimes one House somtimes both and somtimes the King and both Houses together it 's thus that men understand them when they speak of the Supream Court of Parliament and of Acts of Parliament for the King was ever accounted the first of the three Estate without whom the two other had not power to conclude any thing lawfully for all their Authority is derived from him not only for a time but by a continual Influence which being interrupted the power of necessity ceaseâ—h These three togeâ—her have power to interpret the Laws to revoke them and to make others therein properly lies the Oracle of the Laws A Judicious Writer of the Royal party calls the union of the three Estates the Sacred Tripos from whence the Oracles of the Law are pronounced When any one of these three are separate from other the other two stagger and are lame nor cannot serve for a firm foundation for the safety of the State and satisfaction of the Subjects Conscience But let us assume the business higher you cannot more vex our Enemies than to tell them this Truth that the Monarchy which is at this day began by Conquest this is that which by no means they will endure to hear of but would perswade men that it began by an Election and Covenant which indeed had never any being but in their own Fancies If they would be believed for this they should then produce some Records For the bold conjecturers are less credible than all the Histories which assures us of three Conquests in this Kingdom since the Romans and Picts Namely that of the Saxons Danes and Normans Moreover those that would abolish this Office and Dignity destroy that of their own Laws for all the Lands of the Kingdom are held of the King by right of the Sword as appears by the nature of Homages and Services that the Lords of Fiefes owe to the King when William the Conqueror took possession of the Kingdome strengthening the Right of his Conquest by the last Will and Testament of Edward the Confessor he declared himself Master of all the Land and disposed of it according to his pleasure His Son Henry the first eased the People somwhat of the severe and unlimited Government of his Father and confirmed to the English their ancient priviledges which since after long and bloudy wars were anew confirmed and the Quarrel determined by that wise King Edward the first who having as much valour as wisdom in condescending to the Rights of his Subjects knew well how thereby to preserve his own for after all the Soveraignty of Kings remained inviolable and those prerogaâ—ives were preserved which were only proper to him who is not subject but to God alone Such also is the Court of Wards by which a great many Orphans of the Kingdom are in Wardship to the King and almost all the Lands appertaining to him until they be of Age. In this thing the Kings of England exceed all other Christian Princes This being such an essential mark of absolute Soveraignty that there cannot be a greater Certainly if this Monarchy had begun either by Election or Covenant the Subjects would never have given the King so vast a power over their Estates and Families Amongst the priviledges of the English these three are the principal That the King cannot make a Law without the consent of his Estates That no Law made in Parliament can be revoked but in Parliament and that the King can levy no moneys of his Subjects beâ—â—des his ordinary Revenues without the concurrence of the Two Houses in the intervals of Parliaments the King according to his Supream Power may make Edicts seem burdensom to the Subjects or to impair their Laws and Priviledges they humbly present them in the next Parliament the K. when the complaint appears just unâ—o him easeth them for to make their requests pass for Acts without the pleasure of the K. they cannot neither can the K. make new Acts in Parl. without their consent In the mean while the King makes not them partakers of his Authority but assembling them in Parliament he renders them capable to limit his Authority in Cases that appertain to their cognisance for there are many cases wherein they are not to meddle at all in the point of the Militia and for fear they should forget that even this power they have to limit the King comes from the Authority of the King and he can take it away from them when he pleaseth for when he breaks up the Parliament he retires to himself the Authority that he gave them to limit his and moreover if they stretch their priviledges beyond the pleasure of the King he hath power to dissolve the Parliament and after the word of the King is passed which dischargeth them and sends them away they have not power to sit or consult a minute Whence Bodinus well versed in the nature of the States of Christendome concludes the King of England to have Soveraign Authority The Estates of England saith he cannot be assembled nor dissolved but by the Edict of the Prince no more then in France and Spain which proves sufficiently that the Assemblies have no power of themselves to command or forbid a thing and he laughs at the ignorance of Bellaga who affirm the States of Arragon to be above their King and yet nevertheless confesseth the States cannot assemble nor separate without him Illud Novum planè absurdum That saith he is New and altogether a most absurd Doctrine And therefore it was that which occasioned them who had a design to overthrow Church and State to labour to draw a promise from his Majesty that the late long Parliament should not be dissolved without the consent of both Houses well knowing that without that granted the King when he pleased might have overturned their designs which they having obtained shewed by their Actions that they thought themselves then priviledged to do what they would without his Authority and thus it is with us at this day Yet so it is that they themselves do confess that this grant did
can depâ—se the King or dispense with their Subjects Oath of Allegiance If any of ours speak otherwise we are ready to disavow it Very often those that teach well are seduced to do ill being overcome by temptation and yet very few ever go so far as to teach ill to justifie their Actions God hath kept us hitherto from that And although it may happen unto us as unto others to break the Commandments of God Mat. 5.19 but we hope never so to be forsaken of him to teach others to do so Thâ—n is the evil desperate when vices become manners and yet more evil when the evil manners become Doctrines that poor souls are instructed to sin for Conscience sake Oh observe that there is not a more certain sign of a people forsaken of God than this Therefore with the same liberty you invite us to maintain your Opinions by a publike Association we earnestly beseech you to correct your own and condemn all your Maximes contrary to sound Doctrine Enemies to the peace of States Majesty and the safety of Kings taking heed of drawing reproach and persecution upon the profession of the Gospel and to render your neighbours suspected for the faults of others Also that you re-establish the use of the Lords Supper intermitted in divers places these many years that ye give order for children to be baptized and that there be no more aged persons rebaptized That they print not any more that all Churches which baptize Infants are a faction of Antichristians that none teach any more that the Sacraments are not necessary and that for a quarrel of State they dispossess not faithful Orthodox Pastors of their Benefices to put Hereticks in their places As for the quarrel ye have against Antichrist we should be very glad to joyn with you provided that ye observe these two conditions the one not to call Antichrist that which is not for we gather by your Epistles and Declarations that you give the Title of upholders of Antichrist to many of our Brethren whose confession agrees with ours and with whom you ought to bear and with Charity amend their faults on condition that they may deal the like with you The other condition is That ye fight against Antichrist by lawful ways prescribed in the Word of God namely by the Spirit of his mouth that is by the power of the Gospel for as they were not the warlike Engines of Joshua but the Trumpets of the Sanctuary that made the walls of Jericho to fall down so it is not the Cannon but the Trumpet of the Gospel which is required to pull down the walls of Babylon These are the weapons of our warfare which are mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds 2 Cor. 10.4 they are not carnal And besides Divine Authority experience should have have taught you that God blesseth not these designs of pulling down Antichrist by the Sword It was the Epidemical Phrensie of Germany now sixscore years since which turn'd into smoak and confusion Indeed if our King should Covenant in a just quarrel against Antichrist and Lewis the 14th assume for the devisoe of his Mony that which Lewis the 12th stamped upon his Crowns at Pisa Perdam Nomen Babiloniâ— we would with a great deal of cheerfulness follow him in this War but we cannot approve of a Covenant or League against Antichrist made and agreed upon in spight of the Supreme Powers who chuse Chiefs other then their Soveraigns For such Leagues or Covenants are the open Rebellion of Subjects againâ—t their Prince Upon which the Observation attributed to Bullinger is very remarkable and which should extreamly move you That the Anabaptists began with the destruction of Bishops accounting as you the Office and dignity of Bishops was an appurtenance of Antichrist but they ended with the destruction of Magistrates Our Churches look upon the predictions of the fall of Antichrist and the establishment of the Kingdom of Jesus Christ as objects of their Hope and not as Rules of their Duty They govern not themselves by Prophesies but by Commands and make Conscience of transgressing the Laws of God out of zeal to advance his Kingdom so leaving to God the execution of his counsels we keep our selves in a peaceable obedience to our Sovereign and in doing that we yield obedience to God who commands to submit to every Ordinance of man for the Lords sake 1 Pet. 2.13 and to pray for Kings and for all that are in Authority that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty for this is good and acceptable in the sight of God and our Saviour 1 Tim. 2.2 If we embrace your Covenant or make one like it we cannot obey these commands of the Gospel for to Covenant without permission of our Sovereign would be to Covenant against him to take up Arms in the Kingdom without him or against him comes all to the same thing What Cannot our sufferings which you remember so often to us perswade you from following so dangerous a Councel for we retain and persevere in the Instruction given us that we must not remedy an evil by sin nor defend Piety by Disloyalty God hath no need of our sins to defend his cause the preservation of the true Religion is the Cause of God and his work which he will never forsake and even then when all humane means seems to fail he watcheth for the preservation of his Church which if he is pleased to afflict it s our duty to humble our selves and when he is pleased also to raise her up we need not carry to his help Sedition and Rebellion In fine We love the King that God hath given us by duty and inclination trembling at the mention of your Covenant and the younger his Majesty is the more we account our selves bound to endeavour to preserve peace in his State hoping that when he comes of years he will acknowledge the services we have done him in his Minority and that he will consider with what Fidelity and Integrity his Subjects of the Reformed Religion have cast off the instant solicitations of Strangers conceiving they can never be good Christians without being good Subjects and that to obey their King and to offer up their Goods and Lives to his service is a great part of the service they owe to God The English Covenanters may receive this Answer as the Answer of the Churches of France until they have disavowed it by a publick Declaration CHAP. XIII The preceding Answer confirmed by Divines of the Reformed Religion with an Answer to some Objections of the Covenanters upon this Subject TO the end it may better appear that the preceding Answer for the Reformed Churches of France is drawn from the Model of their Doctrine behold here some few passages Calvin speaks thus If we be persecuted for piety by a wicked and sacrilegious Prince before all things let us remember our sins not doubting but God sends
us these scourges for our sins by this our impatience will be bridled by Humility Moreover le ts remember that it is not for us to remedy these evils and that all that we have to do is to beg help of God in whose hands the hearts of Kings and motions in Kingdoms are He said a little before That the Word of God bound us not only to be subject to Princes that are worthy of our duty but to all Princes whatsoever and howsoever they came to the Soveraignty and although they do nothing less then perform the duties of good Soveraigns In his Commentary upon Daniel Let us learn saith he by the example of the Prophet to beseech God for Tirants if it shall please him to subject us to their inordinate pleasure for what though they be unworthy of all Offices of Humanity yet neverthelesse because it is by the will of God that he commands it s our duty to bear the yoke patiently not only because of wrath as Saint Paul admonisheth but also for Conscience sake otherwise we are not only Rebels against them but against God This Lesson is of the same Authors Let this be ever in our memory that the same Divine Authority that gives Authority to Kings establisheth also the most wicked Kings Oh let never these seditious thoughts enter into our spirits that we should deal with the King as he deserves and that it is not reasonable to yield the duty of Subjects to him who will not perform the duty of King to us Which is notwithstanding the arguing of the Covenanters Peter Martyr an Italian but a Minister in those Churches our enemies invite to associate with them is not less contrary to them Expounding that place of the Proverbs By me Kings reign saith That under the name of Kings the Text understands also Tyrants Whence he collects this consequence Therefore learning hence that thy K. is established by God beware thou never conspirest any seditious thing in the State all that thou must do when thou art oppressed is to appeal to the Tribunal of God there being no other superiour power to whom a Tyrant ought to obey He saith also very pertinently worthy our best observation That then when God Would chastise the Kings of Judah for their sins he did not do it by the Jews but by the Babylonians Assyrians and Egyptians shewing by the conduct of his justice and providence that it is not for subjects to take knowledge of the faults of their soveraigns but that they ought to leave them wholly to God who hath other means in his hand to punish them and reduce them to their duty Surely if Calvin and Martyr had lived in these days and were benificed in England they would eject them out of their benefices for this troublesom doctrine which hinders the progress of the holy Covenant and fils their consciences full of scruples whom they instruct to rebel against their Soveraign for the Lords sake And above all Monsieur Deodatâ— would be very ill dealt with by them for being Author of that excellent Epistle sent from the Church of Genevah to the Ecclesiastical Assembly at London in which your good King is highly prais'd for the justice and clemency of his proceedings in this present quarrel the popular tumults condemned which forced him to retire from his Parliament and these Gentlemen earnestly entreated to dispossess their spirits of all factious inclinations and to wash off this foul spot by which they have and do defame the pure profession of the Gospel giving occasion for the world to believe that the reformed Religion hath a secret hatred and antipathy against the Majesty of Kings and soveraign authority against this Epistle our enemies vomited out many outragious words in their books maintaining that it was supposititious and invented by some prophane Atheist Behold here the thanks that this great and learned person and the reverend Ministers his brethren received for their charitable and truly Christian counsel And this is further to be observed that the Assembly at London having sent their Epistle and Oath of their Covenant to seventeen forraign Churches whereof the Churches of France made but one they make no noise of the Answers they received which doth evidently testifie they did not satisfie them and that they durst not produce them for fear of making it appear that the generality of the reformed Churches were ashamed of their actions and condemned the insurrections of Subjects against their Soveraign under pretence of reformation This Divinity of Rebellion being founded upon one only Maxime that the power of Kings is of humane and not divine right and that their right to the Kingdom is but a paction between them and the people It s much to purpose to produce here what the Churches of France hold hereupon and how they refuse the reasons of the Jesuits which are the same with the Covenanters Behold the last Chapter of the Buckler of Faith which is a garment so fit for the size of both parties that after the one hath made use of it the other may put it on they need change nothing but the persons Thomas the Prince of the School Divines saith that the power of Princes and Lords is but of humane institution and comes not from God to whom we may joyn Cardinal Bellarmine in his Book against Barkley and Monsieur Arnoux who upon the second Article of our confession cals the power of the Magistrate a humane law conformable to the Apothegme of reverend Father Binet the Jesuit who told Mr. Casaubon that it were better all Kings were killed than a confession should be revealed because the power of Kings is but an humane right but confession is of Divine right The Reasons they bring for this opinion are 1. That the first King that was raised in the world namely Nimrod was raised by violence and not by the ordinance of God 2. That the most part of the Empires and Kingdoms that ever have been came by conquest one Nation overcoming the other or by some Prince whose ambition moved him to pick an unjust quarrel with his Neighbour 3. That Emperors and Kings are established by humane ways whether they come to the Crown by hereditary succession or by election since there is no extraordinary revelation nor no rule in the Word of God that a Nation are bound to follow rather Succession which is hereditary than that which is by Election 4. That there is no express command of God to obey Henry rather than Lewis or to acknowledge this man rather than that for King 5. That for these considerations the Apostle St. Peter calls our obedience to Kings an Ordinance of man saying Submit your selves to every Ordinance of man for the Lords sake whether it be to the King as supream or unto Governours c. 1 Pet. 2.15 These are the ordinary reasons of the Covenanters if they should disavow them their Books would witness
power by certain humane means introduced by custome which notwithstanding hinders not but their power may be founded in the Word of God when they are once established for as we said before the Question is not of the means by which a Prince comes to the Kingdome but what Obedience is due to him after he is once instaled And therefore Saint Peter after he had called this Ordinance an humane Ordinance commands us to subject our selves for the Lords sake and to obey his command Whosoever makes the Authority of Kings depend upon the institution of men and not upon the Ordinance of God lessens their Majesty more then three quarters and takes from them that which secures their lives and Crowns more then their Guards or mighty Armies which plants in the Subjects hearts Fear instead of Love and Reverence Then the fidelity and obedience of Subjects will be firm and lasting when it shall be incorporated with piety and accounted a part of Religion and of the service we owe to God This foundation being over-turned that the Authority of Kings is but an humane Ordinance that which they build upon it must necessarily fall for to reason thus that the people may take away their Authority from the King because they gave it him is to prove one absurdity by another as if one should prove the Moon might be burnt because it s made of wood For to say the people gave the power to the King is to imagine that which never was no not in Kingdomes which are Elective The People give not the King his Authority for they cannot give that they have not but he defers his obedience to Henry or Charles But this Prince being elected receives his Authority from God as the beginning and source from whence all power flowes By me Kings Raign Pro. 8.15 And there is no Power but of God Rom. 13.1 None ought therefore to take this Power which God hath given him Thus the Wife choseth her Husband and gives him a promise of obedience in marriage but it is not she that gives him his Authority that comes from above And there is as great an absurdity to say that the People may depose the King because they chuse him as to affirm that the Woman may put away her Husband or subject him to her when she shall judge expedient because that she made choice of him For the woman loseth the liberty of her choice by the bond of marriage and the People likewise lose the liberty to revoke their choice when the Prince Elected is declared King 'T is a strange consequence to say that the people may take away the Kings Authority because they have sworn obedience to him the Election is no other thing And it 's a reason that overthrows it self to say that the people may take from the King his Authority because they gave it him For put the case that it were true that the people gave Authority to the King whom they Elect since then the people have given away their Authority 't is no more in them This maxime being once admitted that it is lawful for every one to take back again what he hath given it would break the Laws of Society and fill the world with injustice and confusion But let our enemies know that although the Authority of the King had not begun before the Oath of Allegiance which this Parliament took in a Body at the beginning of their sitting yet the Body of the State made thereby an irrevocable gift of their obedience to the King and from this Oath we draw a better consequence then theirs namely that they cannot dispose of their obedience since they have given it to the King So that were their reasons good they would be of no force but in Kingdomes which were Elective and make nothing against King Charles for neither he nor any of the Kings his Ancestors in all ages past ever came to the Crown by Election It 's not to purpose to alledge the Oath the King took at his Coronation as an agreement and paction made with his people equivalent to an Election for the King receives not his Kingdome at his Coronation he is King before his Crown is put on and therefore Watson and Clark who conspired against King James of glorious memory were justly condemned as guilty of High Treason although they alledged that the King was not then Crowned and it was judged by the Court that the Crowning was but a ceremony for to make the King known to his people It 's the like also in France I judge saith Bodin that no man doubts but the King enjoyes before his Anointing the possession and propriety of his Kingdome Before this ceremony the King enjoyes as fully all his Rights as after and according to the Laws of France and England the King never dies whilst there remains any of the Royal Blood for in the same hour that the King expires the lawful Heir is totally invested of the Kingdome Wherefore the Eldest Sonne of Edward the Fourth who was murthered by his Uncle Richard is by general consent numbered amongst the Kings and named Edward the Fifth although he never wore the Crown nor took any Oath nor exercised any Authority Henry the Sixth was not Crowned but in the ninth year of his Reign and yet before his Coronation many were attainted of High Treason which could not have been done if he had not been acknowledged King In the Oaths of the Kings of France and England at their Coronation there is no image of stipulation covenant or agreement betwixt them and their subjects They receive not their Crowns upon any condition and their people owe their obedience whether they perform or violate their promises This Oath is a laudible custome profitable to bear up the Authority of the Prince by the love of his Subjects and to give to the people this satisfaction that the King whom God hath given them hath an intention to govern them with Justice and Clemency and to preserve their Rights and Liberties If the King by his Oath should bind himself to fall from the Right to his Kingdome when he should violate his Promises he would then be lesser after his Oath then before and surely if the Kings did believe they should diminish their propriety by their Oath they would never take it and to shew that their Authority depends not of their Oath but their Oath of their Authority the Kings of England form it at their pleasure Very hardly shall you find three that have taken the same Oath without changing some things That which was presented to Henry the Eighth which is to be seen in the Rolls was corrected by his own hand and interlined And moreover the Oath is made to God and not to the People and binds the Conscience of the Prince but doth not limit his Soveraignty if the intention of this solemnity were to make a stipulation or agreement with the people the people at the same time should also
King whom they ought to defend and maintain against a stranger usurping and that had murthered the Royal Family and here the Maxime is valid That against a publike enemy every one hath right to take up Arms But what conclude they from these two last examples they would have been ashamed to have named them before the death of their King but since they have explained themselves God defend the holiness of his Word and confound this Divelish Divinity Those that follow are not much better they alledge the example of the Priests who resisted King Uzziah when he would have exercised the Priests Office so ought the Ministers of the Gospel to resist the King if he would administer the Sacraments but this resistance ought to be done by humble admonitions and as refusing to serve him in his design not by way of Arms In the matter of 〈…〉 the Priests used not any violence it is said 〈…〉 caused him to go out of the Temple because Go◠〈…〉 him with the Leprosie but that 〈…〉 force for the Text saith vers 20. he 〈…〉 â—ed to go out because the Lord had 〈…〉 his serves nothing for their Subject they have no other reason to alledge this but because having quarrelled against all Kings they take delight to blast their Dignity The like is the example of Elisha who commanded the door to be shut against the messenger that was sent from Ioram to cut off his head 2 Kings 2.32 If Elisha had sent a Messenger to cut off the Kings Head the example had been to the purpose for this is our case at this day but to shut the door against an Officer of the Kings to save his life being condemned to die wrongfully and without force of Justice is very far from attempting either against the Person or Authority of the King The English Law in many Caseâ— gives to every one his house for a place of safety neither is there any Law either Divine or Humane that forbids us to defend a blow from what part soever it comes if the Covenanters had done no other thing there never had been a War but they proceeded further then defence Was there ever a more important Action upon so small a foundation to persecute their King by Sea and Land destroy his Estate plant their Cannon against his Person imprison him and at last cut off his head because Elisha caused the door to be shut against the Messenger of Joram But in recompence behold here two proofs wherein there is as much piety as reason Judg. 5.23 Deborah cursed the Inhabitants of Meroz because they came not forth to help the Lord against Jabin and Sisera and Jer. 48.10 Jeremy cursed them that kept their sword from shedding the blood of the Moabites Ergo Cursed are all they that came not to help the Covenanters against the King For these rare consequences they deserve a bundle of Thistles such as Asses feed on and to be driven from the society of men as being deprived both of Reason and Humanity who hath given them power to stretch to the King either by words or actions the judgements pronounced against the enemies of God and which are restrained to certain Nations and Persons The King was he a Moabite Was he a Pagan or an Usurper of a Kingdom as Jabin Are you Prophets as Deborah and Jeremy to curse with Authority If ye be not Prophets ye are Sacrilegious for cursing is a Fire that appertains only to God to cast forth they who are so bold to take it into their hands without Authority burn them and hurt none but themselves but oftentimes doth good to them whom they would hurt for this Rashness moves God to jealousie and provokes him to do the contrary according to the Psalmist Psal 109. Let them curse but do thou bless we have great hopes that our enemies shall be the Occasion of the blessing of God upon us since they take such pains to curse us it is the constant Argument of their Sermons and publike Prayers to it they employ the vehemency of their Eloquence and fervour of their Devotion Let us then say with David 2 Sam. 16.12 It may be the Lord will look upon our affliction and that the Lord will requite good for their cursing but let us bless them that persecute us and despitefully use us O our God! turn their Hearts and bless their persons and as our Lord Jesus by his Prayer on the Cross saved them which crucified him save we beseech thee all those that crucifie him in his Members and those who killing us think they do God service CHAP. III. Express Texts of Scripture which Commands Obedience and forbids Resistance to Soveraigns FOr to draw them from Examples and particular Cases which is their retreat to general Precepts we beseech them as they love God and their own salvation to review their proofs and consider that in all the Scripture there is neither Precepts nor Permission that authorizeth the taking up of Arms against their Soveraign but there are very many formal Commands to the contrary The first Commandment Honour thy Father and thy Mother binds us to honour the King for in the beginning Soveraignty appertained to Fathers and is derived of the paternal power Deut. 13.6 c. Now it is impossible to honour the King and draw your sword against him upon which we observe that in case of Idolatry the Father was commanded by the King to accuse his Son and Daughter and the Husband his Wife and to stretch forth first his hand against them to slay them but neither the Son nor the Daughter ought to accuse the Father nor the Wife the Husband much less to put forth their hand against them Whence we learn that neither Children nor Subjects ought to rise up against their Fathers or their Kings which have in them the Paternal Character no not for the service of God and that their Persons ought to be inviolable those who confess this Truth and yet in the mean while separate the Authority of the King from his Person deny that which they have confessed and expose the Person of the King to violence for it is the Authority that renders the Persons of Kings unviolable Therefore among so many Reprehensions and Judgments against Idolatrous Kings whereof the holy History is full ye shall in no place nor part find that the people are reproved for not depressing or deposing their King ordinarily the punishment that God sent upon them came immediatly from himself or out of the Kingdome not by their own Subjects Before God would employ Jehu who was a Subject to destroy the Kings of Israel and Judah he anointed him King and besides gave him a special and extraordinary Command We say the like of Jeroboam whose Example is very ill alledged to defend Rebellion for Jeroboam was sent of God to take the Kingdom from Rehoboam and was authorized by a formal donation The sentence of David before mentioned 1 Sam. â—6 9 is of
very great weight Who can stretch forth his hand against the Lords Anointed and be guiltless And this other of him Touch not mine Anointed and do my Prophets no harm Psal 109.19 But the Covenanters have violently and cruelly proceeded against both God speaking under the name of Soveraign Wisdom saith By me Kings reign and Princes decree Justice By me Princes rule and Nobles even all the Judges of the earth Prov. 8.15 16. If it be by him that Kings reign they should be respected for love of him and he that resists them makes against God To this purpose also tends that excellent scripture Prov. 24.21 22. My Son fear thou the Lord and the King and meddle not with them that are given to change For their calamity shall rise suddenly and who knoweth the ruine of them both A Scripture which shews that the fear of the King is a part of the fear of God and that those that rise up against him are reserved of God for a sudden calamity And this is also of him Eccles 8.2 I counsel you to keep the Kings Commandment and that in regard of the Oath of God A passage that binds us to keep the Commandment of the King for the Love of God and the Oath of Allegiance under which all Subjects are born and many have actually taken for every Oath is a contract made with God And a little after Eccles 8.14 Where the word of the King is there is power and who may say unto him what dost thou But we have to do with those who make this Question to their King and care neither for his word nor power The Law speaks expresly Exod. 22.28 Thou shalt not revile the Judges nor curse the Ruler of thy people Yea it restrains the thoughts as well as actions Eccles 10.20 Curse not the King no not in thy thoughts If we are not to speak nor think ill of the King much less should do ill to him the violation of these Commands by the Covenanters are too enormous and cry aloud to Heaven for vengeance Our Lord Jesus Christ himself commands us to render to Cesar the things which are Cesars and to God the things that are Gods Mat. 22. â—1 He himself would pay Tribute to Cesar although of right he should have made Cesar Tributary to him and not having money he caused it to be brought to him by a Miracle rather than he would be wanting in this duty this is far from taking the Kings Revenues from him and employing the Tribute due to him to raise a war against him When the Officers of Justice came to take him he rebuked his Disciple who had drawn his sword against them and healed the wound that he had made Mat. 26. He suffered himself peaceably to be led before Herod and Pilate whom he might have as easily destroyed as make them fall down backward who came to apprehend him but he submitted to the Divine Authority that shined in the Person of the Governour yea even to death openly professing that the power which he had was from above John 19.11 If the power of Kings depended upon the gift of their Subjects as the Covenanters held Jesus Christ should have said that the power that he had was from below but this Divinity proceeds from another Doctor than the Son of God Saint Paul is marvellous express and full upon this point Rom. 13.1 c. Let every soul be subject unto the higher Powers for there is no Power but of God The Powers that be are ordained of God Whosoever therefore resisteth the Power resisteth the Ordinance of God and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation For Rulers are not a terrour to good works but to the evil Wilt thou then not be afraid of the Power Do that which is good and thou shalt have praise of the same For he is the Minister of God to thee for good but if thou do that which is evil be afraid for he beareth not the sword in vain for he is the Minister of God a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doth evil Wherefore ye must needs be subject not only for wrath but also for Conscience sake For for this cause pâ—y you tribute also for they are Gods Ministers attending continually upon this very thing Render therefore to all their dues Tribute to whom Tribute is due Custome to whom Custome Fear to whom Fear Honour to whom Honour Oh! behold with what vigour of spirit and power the Apostle presseth Obedience and condemns resistance of Soveraign Powers Is there any thing in the world so strong and pressing as this Divine Lesson the authority alone had been sufficient but over and above he adds threatnings promises reason upon reason they who shall well consider the Text will learn That it is impossible to be a good Christian without being a good Subject and that they cannot resist the King without resisting God also that terrible threatning of damnation should retain men in their duty Let every one in the fear of God that have born Arms against their King think well of this and repent Oh! it is a dangerous thing to resist God he must be very imprudent that will hazard the damnation of his soul so formally denounced against Rebels upon distinctions and good intentions at the great day of account they will find these very light things The Divines of the Covenant labour with might and main to elude the force of this Scripture which plucks them by the throat they change themselves into many contrary forms to escape it as we shall see hereafter Saint Paul recommends this Doctrine to Titus Tit. 3.1 2. Put them in mind to be subject to Principalities and Powers to obey Magistrates to be ready to every good work to speak evil of no man to be in brawlers shewing all meekness to all men A dangerous Scripture to teach subjection and meekness is to strike the Covenanter at the heart Saint Peter speaks in the same stile 1 Pet. 2.13 c. Submit your selves to every Ordinance of man for the Lords sake whether it be to the King as supream or unto Governours as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evil doers and the praise of them that do well for so is the will of God that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men As free and not using your liberty for a cloak of maliciousnesse but as the Servants of God Honour all men Love the Brotherhood Fear God Honour the King The rest of the Chapter is employed in teaching Christians to submit to their Superiours and to suffer for righteousness Behold truly the Doctrine of Christ it 's thus that the Apostles plaâ—ted the Church it 's thus that they fought the good fight not in killing Kings but in bearing the Cross for the Gospel One of ours having requested a Learned Divine that followed the party of the Covenanters that he would give him a precept of