that Nicholas 2. doubted not to commit the government of all the Churches of England unto Edward the Confessor as by and by we shall more largely declare And the Kings of France being so likewise consecrated ever since the time of Clodoveus aliàs Ludovicus whom Saint Remigius Bishop of Rheimes both baptized and anointed about the year of our Lord 500. have from time to time in all ancient ages exercised the like Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction insomuch that Clodoveus himself being but newly entred into is doubted not to appoint a Councell at Orleans and to call thither the Bishops and Clergy of France but out of the motion of Priestly minde to use the very words of the Councell cōmanded the Priests meaning the Bishops to assemble there for debating necessary matters which in his own consideration he had advised upon and delivered to them in heads and titles and they having answered thereunto and framed the Canons of that Councell accordingly did submit them to his judgement and desiring if it approved them himself for greater authority would confirm them Tom. 2. Concil pag. 309. in rescripto Synodi The Kings of Jerusalem and Sicil were also anointed and endowed with Ecclesiasticall authority whereof we shall speak more anon for the right of both these Kingdomes resideth at this present upon the Kings of Spain who till the same came unto them were neither anointed nor crowned and though since that time they have been dignified with both these Prerogatives yet are they not so illustrious in them as in the Kings of England and France for that these are ancient Kingdomes raised by their own power and prowesse and those other of lesse continuance erected by the Pope and not absolute but Feodaries of his Sea And touching that of France also the meer right thereof resteth upon his Majesty of England though de facto another for the time possesseth it So that in this point of unction our Soveraign the King of England is amongst the rest of the Kings of Christendome at this day Peerlesse and transcendent and well therefore might William Rufus say that himself had all the liberties in his Kingdome which the Emperour challenged in his Empire Mat. Paris But I wonder why the Papists should so considently deny the Kings of England to be capable of spirituall jurisdiction when Pope Nicholas 2. of whom wee spake before in an Epistle to King Edward the Confessor hath upon the matter agreed that it may be so for amongst other priviledges that he there bestoweth upon the Church of Saint Peter of Westminster then newly founded by that vertuous King He granteth and absolutely confirmeth that it shall for ever be a place of Regall Constitution and Consecration and a perpetuall habitation of Monkes that shall be subject to no living creature but the King himself free from Episcopall service and authority and where no Bishop shall enter to give any orders c. Tom. Concil part 3. pa. 1129. a. In which words I note first that the Kings of England in those ancient days being before their Coronation meerly Lay persons were by their consecration made candidati Ecclesiasticae potestatis and admitted to the administration thereof for to what other purpose was Consecration ordained but to make secular things to belong unto the Temple and Lay persons to become sacred and Ecclesiasticall like Jacobs stone in the time of the Morall Law which presently upon the anointing thereof became appropriate to the House of God Secondly he plainly maketh the King head of this Monastery that is of the place it self and of all the persons and members therof which then by consequence he might likewise be of all other Ecclesiasticall persons and places through the whole Kingdome And even that also he granteth in a sort in the end of his Epistle Vobis posteris vestris regibus committimus advocationem tuitionem ejusdem loci omnium totius Angliae Ecclesiarum ut vice nostra cum concilio Episcoporum Abbatum constituatis ubique quae justa sunt So that if the Kings of England be pleased to execute this Ecclesiasticall authority as the Popes Vicar then by this his Charter they are invested therewith and peradventure the Clergy of Rome can never revoke it being granted posteris regibus and the Epistles of the Popes being as Barclayus saith of Nich. 1. to Michael the Emperour as an Ecclesiasticall Law Lib. de potest Papae ca. 2. pag. 13. But in the mean time it is hereby evident which I endeavour to prove that the Kings of England are justly capable of spirituall jurisdiction by the Popes own confession for which purpose onely I here alledge it And to give more life to the matter it appeareth by Baronius that Pope Vrbane the granted not onely as much in the Kingdome of Sicil to the King of Spain being the anointed King thereof but added also to that his Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction divers branches of spirituall power belonging meerly to the keys and not to the sword that is to the very function of a Bishop as namely that of Excommunication All which though Baronius impugneth mainly to be of no validity because that all things are void he saith that the Church doth against her self yet the King of Spain both holdeth and exerciseth this function and jurisdiction onely by the connivency of the Pope but defended therein by Cardinall Ascanius Colonna against Baronius But to leave forain examples and to goe on with our domesticall precedents It is manifest by other ancient Authorities Charters and Manuscripts that the Pope thereby granted no more to King Edward and his successors then the same King and his Predecessors before assumed to themselves For this Epistle could not be written to S. Edward before the end of his reign Nicholas not being Pope till then and in the Laws of the same King before that time published himself doth plainly declare himself to be Vicarius summi Regis not summi pontificis yea and that in the government of the Church For the words of his own Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cap. 17. be these The King because he is the Vicar of the highest King is appointed to this purpose that he should rule his earthly Kingdome and the Lords people and should above all things worship his holy Church and govern it and defend it against them that would wrong it and to pull the evill doers out of it c. So that write the Pope what he will S. Edward here taketh upon him to have the rule and government of the Church of England committed to him from God and not from the Pope and to be Gods Vicar not the Popes wherein he imitated his predecessors for King Edgar speaking of the government of the Church saith in plain tearms that it belonged to himself ad nos saith he spectat And because Casaubon in citing this place out of the Manuscript is charged by Parsons to falsifie it and that it is or should be on the
instruct their people when and how to pay their Tithes Tom. 1. Con. pa. 258. Can. 5 c. About the year 786. in the time of Offa a great King of Mercia and Helfwood King of Northumberland and the two Archbishops there was a great Councell held by two Legates from Hadrian the first wherein Tithes were established and it was likewise confirmed in the South part by the King of West-Saxony And as M. Selden saith it is a most observable Law being made with great solemnity of both powers of both States History cap. 8. pag. 201. Tom. 1. Con. pag. 291. Can. 17. In the year 855. King Ethelwolph by the consent of all his Baronage and Bishops granted the perpetuall right of Tithes to the Church throughout his whole kingdome and that free from all taxes and exactions used then in the State and this statute is very remarkable and was confirmed by other Kings Brorredus and Edmundus of East-Angles Tom. 1. Con. pag. 384. For the Northern Clergy there was a Law made to punish the non-payment of Tithes Tom. 1. Con. pag. 501. In a great Parliament at Earham Anno 1009. by all the States assembled under King Ethelred Tithes are commanded and confirmed Tom. 1. Con. pag. 510 c. Maccabeus an ancient King of Scotland confirmeth Tithes in his Laws Con. pag. 571. Anno 1050. In the Canons of Aelfric Tithes are confirmed Anno 1052. Con. pag. 572. These and many other Constitutions and Laws are particularly and more fully recited in the first Tome of our Councels and in Mr Seldens History cap. 8. from whence the Reader may please to take satisfaction for the space of some 500. years before the Conquest William the Conquerour in the fourth year of his reign when he took a view of all the ancient Laws of the Land he first confirmed the liberties of the Church because that by it saith Hoveden the King and the kingdome have their solid foundation pag. 601. and herein amongst other Laws of King Edward these particularly touching Tithes which Hen. 1. also did Anno 1100. as appeareth by Mat. Par. pa. 53. The like did also Hen. 2. in the 26. year of his reign as Hoveden witnesseth pa. 600. And for a perclose of all that went before or should follow after King Hen. 3. in the ninth year of his reign by that sacred Charter made in the name of himself and his heirs for ever granted all this anew unto God We have granted saith he unto God and by this our present Charter have confirmed for us and for our heirs for evermore that the Church of England shall be free and shall have all her holy rights inviolable Magna Charta cap. 1. And that this Charter might be immortall and like the sanctified things of the Temple for ever inviolable it was not onely fortified by the Kings Seal the sacred Anchor of the kingdome but by his solemn oath and the oath of his sonne and the Nobility of the kingdome Yea the whole kingdome yeelded themselves to stand accursed if they should at any time after impeach this grant And therefore in the 25 Ed. 1. a speciall Statute was made for confirmation of this Charter V. Rastals Abridg destat tit Confirmat Sententia lata super chartas wherein amongst other things it is ordained that the Bishops shall excommunicate the breakers thereof and the very form of the sentence is there prescribed according to which upon the 13. Maii Anno 1304. Ed. 1.31 Boniface the Archbishop of Canterbury and five other Bishops solemnly denounced this curse in Westminster Hall the King himself with a great part of the Nobility being present Vid. Pupil oculi part 5. cap. 22. First against all them that should wittingly and maliciously deprive or spoil Churches of their rights Secondly against those that by any art or devise infringed the liberties of the Church or Kingdome granted by Magna Charta de Foresta Thirdly against all those that should make new Statutes against the Articles of these Charters or should keep them being made or bring in or keep other customes and against the writers of those Statutes Counsellors and Executioners thereof that should presume to give judgement according to them And lest this should seem a passion of some particular men for the present time rather then a perpetuall resolution of the whole kingdome in the succeeding ages the zeal and care thereof was continually propagated from posterity to posterity So that in 42 Ed. 3. cap. 1. it was further enacted that if any Statute were made contrary to Magna Charta it should be void And 15. times is this Charter confirmed by Parliament in Ed. 3. time eight times in Rich. 2. reign and six times in Hen. 4. Yea the frontispice of every Parliament almost is a confirmation of the rights and priviledges of the Church as having learned of the very Heathen Poet who had it from the law of Nature 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we begin ever with God Neither was there any man found that ever would or durst with Nero lay hands upon his Mother the Church for he that smiteth his father or mother shall die the death Exod. 20.15 Heu tot sancitas per plurima secula leges Hauserit una dies hora una et persidus error My meaning is not to strain these Laws to the maintenance of such superstitious gifts as were made to the Church against the honour of God but to those onely that were for maintenance of his Word and Ministery which if they were lawfully conferred as no man I think doubteth but they were then let us consider how fearfull a thing it is to pull them from God to rend them from the Church to violate the dedications of our Fathers the Oaths of our Ancestors the Decrees of so many Parliaments and finally to throw our selves into those horrible curses that the whole body of the kingdome hath contracted with God as Nehomiah and the Jews did Nehem. 10. should fall upon them if they transgresse herein For as Levi paid Tithes in the loins of Abraham Heb. 7. so the lawfull vow of the fathers descendeth upon their children And as the posterity of Jonadab the sonne of Rechab were blessed in keeping it Jer. 35.18 so doubtlesse have we just cause to fear the dint of this curse in breaking this vow Say then that Tithes were not originally due unto God and that there belonged no portion of our Lands unto his Ministers yet are we in the case of Nehemiah and the Jews Nehem. 10.32 They made Statutes by themselves to give every year the third part of a shekel for the service of the house of God And our fathers made Laws amongst themselves to give a portion of their Land and the tenth part of their substance that is these Parsonages for the service of the house of God If they were not due before they are now due For when thou vowest a vow unto the Lord thy God thou shalt not
Treatise which is here published for satisfaction to all that be truly pious and well-affected sons of the Church of England For his larger work of Tithes which he prepared long agoe it is also here added though in some few places imperfect and might have been better polished by his own hand if he had engaged himself upon it and desisted from his greater works so much desired by many eminently learned both at home and abroad yet rather then suffer the losse of such a testimony of his piety to God and good affection to uphold the setled maintenance of Gods House and Ministers to whom double honour is due Tim. 1.15 as the Apostle saith it is thought fit to publish it as he left it imperfect in some passages and defective of such ornaments and arguments as he could have added further out of his store and abundance though what he hath here delivered is so compleat as doth fully discover the ability of his judgement and that these reasons and illustrations produced by him could hardly have proceeded from any other Author being agreeable to his expressions style and arguments delivered in his other writings And at this instant it seems very necessary in regard the humour and displeasure of many in the world is now obstinately bent to beat down root up overthrow and destroy whatsoever the piety and wisdome of our forefathers built and contributed in the Primitive times of their faith and conversion to Christianity as if all they did were Popish and superstitious fit to be rooted up and as if themselves had a Commission as large as the great Prophet had from God and were set over the Nations and Kingdomes to root out and pull down to destroy and to throw down to build and to plant Jer. 1.10 But if men will rest satisfied either with proof from divine authority there wants not enough here to guide their consciences or with humane Laws and Statutes confirmed and fully enacted by many Parliaments whereby they are now become ancient and fundamentall as well as any other Laws together with the constant course and practice of above a thousand years in our Common-wealth there wants not here the testimony of all our ancient Monuments Statutes Deeds and Charters of our Kingdome Princes and Noble men which this learned Knight hath more fully and compleatly published in order of time and in their originall Saxon-language in his first Tome of our English Laws and Councels for the first five hundred years before the Conquest being his last work before his death Whereunto when the second Tome which he hath also finished shall be added for the next 500. years after the Conquest together with his learned Commentary upon all difficult and ancient rites and customes there will be abundant proof from all humane Laws and the authority of our Common Law together with the practice of our Kingdome in severall ages that no man can raise a doubt or exception that shall not receive satisfaction fully and clearly As for the Laws of Israel and the Heathens also in imitation of Gods own people the Decrees and Canons of generall Councels in succeeding times here is also such abundant testimony produced that no judicious Reader can refuse to yeeld his vote thereto and approbation for continuance There is another noble and religious Knight of Scotland Sir James Sempil who hath so accurately laboured in this argument and proved the divine right of Tithes from the holy Scriptures insisting thereupon onely and no other humane Authorities or Antiquities further then he finds theÌ„ to play upon the Text pro or contra as himself saith in his Preface that much satisfaction may be received from his pious endeavours having therein cleared some Texts of Scripture from sinister interpretations and exactly considered the first Institution and Laws for Tithes delivered by God himself both in the Old and New Testaments If both these godly and learned witnesses of the truth will not serve the turn to convince the judgement of some ill-affected they being both raised up by God out of both Nations Numb 11.26 like to Eldad and Medad among the people extraordinarily to prophecy and defend the truth being moved and inspired doubtlesse by God himself besides those that belong to the Tabernacle to uphold and maintain his own cause against the adversaries of his Church yet they may well stop the mouths of worldlings and Mammonists from clamour and inveighing and perswade them to acquiesce upon the known and fundamentall Laws of the Kingdome which are as ancient and fundamentall as any other or rather more because they concern especially the upholding and maintenance of the worship of God then which nothing can be more necessary or fundamentall and therefore the pious and good King Edward the Confessor doth begin his Laws with the recitall and confirmation of the Ecclesiasticall Lawes and particularly of Tithes Church-possessions and Liberties thereof â—l ad confess â—n Prooem A legibus igitur sanctae matris Ecclesiae sumentes exordium quoniam per eam Rex regnum solidum habent subsistendi fundamentum leges libertates pacem ipsius concionati sunt Because thereby the King and Kingdome have their solid foundation for subsistence therefore the laws liberties and peace thereof are first proclaimed and established And thus begins also Magna Charta Nos intuitu Dei pro salute animae nostrae ad exaltationem sanctae Ecclesiae c. and so also many other Statutes successively pour le common profit de Saint Esglise del Realm Westminst 1. c. The possessions tithes and rights of the Clergy being thus setled they may doubtlesse be enjoyed having been freely collated according as was foretold by the Prophets Esay and others by Kings Nobles and many good men Esay 49.23 fully confirmed by Law and Parliament If these things had not been primarily due unto God by the rule of his Word yet are they now his and separate from us by the voluntary gift and dedication of our ancient Kings and Predecessors established by the possession of many hundred years that although in the beginning perhaps things were not so commanded in particular as any man else may enjoy lands goods chattels gifts and grants whatsoever is freely collated purchased or obtained by industry or is freely given and bequeathed by Ancestors or other Benefactors although perhaps there be not divine right in speciall to prove and justifie so much land money rents or goods of any sort to be his due and right God did foretell and promise by the Prophet Esay Spelmans first Treatise § 5. cap. 28. inf cap. 49.23 that he would raise up in the Church of the redeemed Kings and Queens to be nursing fathers and nursing mothers to his Church that is saith Calvin upon the Text Magni Reges ac principes non solùm Christi jugum subierunt sed etiam facultates suas contulerunt ad erigendam fovendam Christi Ecclesiam
this done in the heat and agony of zeal then privily enflamed on all parts against the Romish religion insomuch as other inconveniences and enormities likewise followed thereon as in Ed. 6. the burning of many notable Manuscript Bookes the spoiling and defacing of many goodly Tombes and Monuments in all parts of the kingdome pulling down of Bels Chancels and in many places of the very Churches themselves Moses for haste broke the Tables of the Law and these inconveniences in such notable transmutations cannot be avoided some corn will goe away with the chaffe and some chaffe will remain in the corn mans wit cannot suddainly or easily sever them Therefore our Saviour Christ foreseeing this consequence delayed the weeding out of the tares from the wheat till the Harvest was come that is the full time of ripenesse and opportunity to doe it Besides light and darknesse cannot be severed in puncto the day will have somewhat of the night and the night somewhat of the day the religion professed brought something with it of the religion abolished and the religion abolished hath somewhat still that is wanting in ours and neither will ever be so severed Discipline in genere according to the Primitive Church not in specie as they use it but each will hold somewhat of the other no rent can divide them by a line When the children of Israel came out of Aegypt they brought much of the Aegyptian infection with them as appeareth in the Scripture and they left of their rites and ceremonies among the Aegyptians as appeareth in Herodotus Therefore as Moses renued the Tables that were broken through haste and time reformed the errors of religioÌ„ amongst the Israelites So we doubt not but his M ty our Moses wil still proceed in repairing these breaches of the Church and that time by Gods blessing wil mend these evils of ours I will not take upon me like Zedechias to foretell having not the spirit of prophecy but I am verily perswaded that some are already borne that shall see these Appropriate Parsonages restored to the Church let not any man think they are his because Law hath given them him for Tully himself the greatest Lawyer of his time confesseth that Delegibus Stultissimum est existimare omnia justa esse quae sita sint in populorum institutis aut legibus Nothing to be more foolish then to think all is just that is contained in the Laws or Statutes of any Nation Experience teacheth us that our own Laws are daily accused of imperfection often amended expounded and repealed Look back into times past and we shall find that many of them have been unprofitable for the Common-wealth many dishonourable to the kingdome some contrary to the Word of God and some very impious and intolerable yet all propounded debated and concluded by Parliament Neither is this evill peculiar to our Country where hath it not reigned Esay found it in his time and proclaimeth against it Wo be unto you that make wicked Statutes and write grievous things â—at in M. Anton. per servos per vim per latrociniâ—m So Tully and the Roman Historians cry out that their Laws were often per vim contra auspicia impositae reipublicae by force and against all religion imposed upon the Common-wealth God be thanked we live not in those times yet doe our Laws and all Laws still and will ever in one part or other taste of the cask I mean of the frailty of the makers It is not therefore amisse though happily for me to examine them in this point if they be contrary to the Word of God for I think no man will defend them they leave them to be a Law God cannot be confined restrained or concluded by any Parliament let no man therefore as I say think that he hath right to these Parsonages because the Law hath given them him the law of man can give him no more then the law of Nature and God will permit The Law hath given him jus ad rem as to demand it or defend it Vi. Na. Br. 14. s 369. Jus perfectum cum possideatur in promiss imperfectum dum non possideatur premiss in action against another man it cannot give him jus in re as to claim it in right against God Canonists Civilians and common Lawyers doe all admit this distinction and agree that jus ad rem est jus imperfectum right to the thing is a lame Title they must have right in it that will have perfect Title The Law doth as much as it can it hath made him rei usufructuarium but it cannot make him rei dominum the very owner of the thing The books of the Law themselves confesse that all Prescriptions Statutes Doct. Stud. li. 1. c. 2. s 4. a. and Customes against the law of Nature or of God be void and against Justice § 9 That the King may better hold Impropriations then his Lay Subjects No man by the Common law of the Land can have inheritance of Tithes unlesse he be Ecclesiasticall or have Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction Lord Coke part 5. Rep. fol. 15. and Plowd fol. So that he which hath Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction though he be no Ecclesiasticall person yet by the ancient Law of the Land he may enjoy Tithes and this concurreth not onely with the Canon Law but seemeth also to be warranted by the example of the Provinciall Levites who medled not with the Temple and yet received their portion of Tithes and other Oblations as well as those that ministred in the Temple But it plainly excludeth all such as be meerly Lay from being capable of them let us then see by what better Title the King may hold them As the head cannot give life and motion to the divers members of the body unlesse it hold a correspondency with them in their divers natures and compositions So the King the head of the politique body cannot govern the divers members thereof in their severall constitutions unlesse he participate with them in their severall natures which because they are part Lay and part Ecclesiasticall the jurisdiction therefore whereby he governeth them must of necessity have a correspondent mixture and be also partly Lay and partly Ecclesiasticall to the end that from these divers fountains in the person of his Majesty those divers members in the body of the kingdome may according to their peculiar faculties receive their just and competent government My meaning is not that a Prince cannot in morall matters govern his subjects professed in religion unlesse himself doe participate with them in some portion of their spirituall vocation Rom. 13.1 2 Pet. 2.13 for I see that the Apostles themselves were therein subject to the Heathen Princes and gave commandement to all Christians in generall Oportet nos ex 〈◊〉 parte quae ad hanc vitam â—ertinet subdiâ—os esse potestatibus i. homininibus res humanas cum aliquo honore administrantibus in li. ex pos
it were but upon the threshold of his Kingdome and might justly fear some notable transmutation in discontenting his Clergy the halfe arch of his Kingdome even then hee forbare not to contest with them upon points of jurisdiction confining theirs unto matters of faith and extending his own to the uttermost limits of the outward government of the Church But because his hand and his seal doe more authentically enforce credit then the report of Authours and Historians see what he assumeth in his Charter of foundation of the Monastery Sancti Martini de bello commonly called Battail Abbey for that he built it as Romulus did the Capitol in the place where he overcame his enemies In this Charter he granteth that That Church shall be free from all servitude and from all things whatsoever mans invention can imagine and commandeth therefore that it be free from all government of Bishops neither shall the Bishop of Chichester though it be in his Diocesse make any Ordinations there nor grieve it in any thing nor execute any kind of government or authority there but that it be as free saith he from all his exactions as my own Dominicall or Demesne Chappell The Abbot shall not be compelled to goe to the Synod nor forbidden to promote his Monks to holy Orders where himself listeth nor he or his Monks to require what Bishop they will to consecrate Altars c. And this also by my Regall authority I ordain that the Abbot shall be Lord and Judge of all things in his own Church and within one league round about it c. see the Charter at large Here it appeareth that this victorious King Will. 1. took himself to have Pallium Ecclesiasticae jurisdictionis the fulnesse of Ecclesiasticall power and as the supream Magistrate thereof not only abridgeth and revoketh the jurisdiction of other Bishops within this place as of the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishop of Chichester but disposeth the same according to his owne pleasure namely to the Abbey of Battail with so great enlargement of priviledge and authority as no Bishop of the Kingdome hath the like Free from all servitude and from all things whatsoever mans invention can imagine are exquisite words of priviledge and how far they might stretch at those times when the profession of our Laws was not a science into Regall or Canonicall jurisdiction I cannot judge but I know by Staffords case 1 H. 7. f. 18. they will now bee restrained with many exceptions So likewise that the Abbot shall not be compelled to come at Synods or to take Ordinations for his Monks or Consecration of Altars c. from the Bishop of his Diocesse Nec aliquis Episcoporum in Dioecesi collegā suum super-grediatur Con. Carthag c. 19. Burchard li. 1. ca. 64. are directly against the Decrees of the Church Canons Synods and generall Councels As also it is that hee should be Judge of things in his own Church and the circuit assigned which though here it bee but a league I see not but he might as well have made it ten if it had pleased him and by consequence a County or Province And lest the King should seem to have done this by some indulgence from the Pope or connivency of his own Clergy he saith expresly that he doth it by his Regall authority and that not closely or under-hand but Episcoporum Baronum meorum attestatione And to declare how far the Clergy of that time was from repining or impugning this his jurisdiction the Archbishop of Canterbury the Bishops of Chichester Winton and Worcester are witnesses to the Charter and denounce a curse against the breakers thereof One other thing also is worthy of note that the Kings Demean Chappell seemeth by this not to be within the jurisdiction and Diocesse of any Bishop but exempt and as a Regall peculiar reserved onely to the visitation and immediate government of the King or such as it pleaseth him to substitute for the Archbishop of Canterbury hath no jurisdiction there by his own confession ut pat Hoveden l. 4.7 pa. 547. William Rufus in like manner told Anselme Archbishop of Canterbury that no Archbishop or Bishop of his Kingdome should be subject to the Court of Rome or to the Pope Quòd nullus Archiepiscopus vel Episcopus regni sui saith Mat. Paris curiae Romanae vel Papae subesset And because Anselm asked leave of him to fetch his pall from Pope Vrbane at Rome hanc ob rem saith Mat. Paris à rege majestatis reus postulatur he is called in question of High Treason and Gundulphus Bishop of Rochester and very many other Bishops approved the accusation In vita Will. 2. p. 17. 18. Malmsbery reporteth that his offence was for appealing to the Pope in matters between the King and him but he agreeth that all he had was confiscate and himself banished by consent of the Bishops and he addeth further that being after recalled into the Kings favour upon a new difference between the King and him he appealed the second time to Pope Vrbane and without the Kings licence would go thither for which cause his whole Bishopricke and goods were reseised into the Kings hands and he exiled And though the Pope threatned to excommunicate the King if he restored him not and the Councell then holden at Rome stormed much at the matter yet Anselm continued in that plight during the lives both of the King and the Pope Malmsb. de gest Pontif. li. 1. pa. 221 c. FINIS
him and that is as before we have shewed in the same steppes that the rules and maximes of his owne law have prescribed viz. First that we shall doe unto him Homage that is true and faithfull service For it is written Him onely shalt thou serve Secondly that we shall be faithfull unto him as becommeth true tenents that is not to adhere to his enemies the world the flesh and the devill as conspiring with them or suffering them to subtract or encroach upon any part of that which belongeth to God our Lord paramount Thirdly that we shall pay duely unto him all rights and duties that belong unto his Seignory for it is written Give unto God that that is Gods And againe Give the Lord the honour due unto his name c. Psal 29.1 For all which we must be accomptants at the great Audit and there lies a speciall writ of Praecipe in that case Redde rationem villicationis tuae Give an accompt how thou hast carried thy selfe in this thy businesse that is this his service committed to thee But omitting to handle the first and second of these great Reservations I have undertaken the last viz. de reddendis Dei Deo of ren dring that unto God that is Gods And in this I humbly beseech his blessed hand to be with me and guide me for whose onely sake and honour I have adventured to leave the shore I crept by in my former booke and now as with full sailes to launch forth into the deepe upon so dangerous and uncertaine adventure Amen Of TITHES CAP. I. What things be due unto God THat that is to be rendred unto God for his honour out of temporall things granted by him unto man are by his word declared to be some particular portions of the same things The things granted unto man be of three sorts viz. First the time measured out unto him for this life Secondly the place allotted to him for his habitation Thirdly the benefits and blessings assigned to him for his sustenance Out of every of these God must have his honorary part as by way of reservation and retribution in right of his seignory Let us then see what those parts are and how they grow due unto him Touching the first which is the Time of our life he hath out thereof reserved to himselfe the seaventh part for it is written six dayes shalt thou labour and doe all that thou hast to doe but the seaventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God What other time soever we imploy privately and particularly in his worship this must generally be performed and kept both by our selves and our very cattle for if every creature groane with us Rom. 8.22 it is also just that they rejoyce with us sometime But though God be much wronged in this kind as well as in other his rights yet since it is confessed of all parts to be due unto him by the expresse Canon of his word I will not medle with it any farther only I desire that the abusing of it were severely punished or at least in such sort as the Lawes have appointed CAP. II. The second kind of tribute that we are to render unto God i. a portion of our Land THe second thing that God hath given unto man is a place for his residence and that is the earth in generall and to every nation and family a part thereof in particular The earth hath he given to the children of men Psal 115.16 But as he reserved a portion of the time of our life for the celebration of his honour so hath he also reserved a portion out of the place of our residence For in Ezek. 45. he commandeth the children of Israel and in them all the nations of the world that when they come to inhabite the land he giveth them they must divide it into three parts one for the people another for the King but the first for God himselfe God must have Enetiam partem as the Lawyers terme it the part of the eldest or first borne for the tribe of the Levi that is his Priests and Ministers are called to be the first borne of his people Therefore he saith When ye shall divide the Land for inheritance ye shall offer an oblation to the Lord an holy portion of the Land Ezek. 45. And by and by he declareth how it shall be imployed one part to the building of the house of God and the other part for the Priests and Ministers to dwell on And this is no Leviticall precept but an institution of the Law of nature and in performance of the duty that he was tyed unto by this Law Jacob when he was poore and had not wherewithall to build God an house yet he sanctified a portion of ground when God had blessed him to that purpose by erecting a stone and pouring oyle on the head thereof calling the place Bethel that is the house of God and vowing to build it when God should blesse and make him able to doe it Gen. 28.22 which as Josephus testifieth Antiq. lib. 1. cap. 27. he afterwards performed And as God commanded the whole Nation of the Israelites in generall that in laying out the chiefe City they should first assigne a place unto God for his Temple Priests So likewise he commanded every Tribe thereof in particular that after they had their portion in the division of the Land they should likewise out of the same assigne unto the Levites Cities to dwell in with a circuite or suburbs of a thousand cubits round about to keepe their cattell in Command the children of Israel that they give unto the Levites of the inheritance of their possessions Cities to dwell in yee shall also give unto the Levites the suburbs of the Cities round about so they shall have the Cities to dwell in and the suburbs shall be for their cattell and for their substance and for their beasts And the suburbs of the City which ye shall give unto the Levites from the wall outward shall be a thousand cubits round about Numb 35.2 3 4. In execution of this Commandement every Tribe of Israel allotted certaine Cities to the Levites out of their portion according to the quantity thereof as appeareth Jos 21.41 The whole Land of promise according as St. Hierom layeth it out in his Epistle to Dardanus Tom. 3.68 containeth in length from Dan to Bersabe scarce 160. miles and in breadth from Joppa to Bethlem 46. miles A small portion of ground for a Kingdome so famous and so small indeed as St. Hierom there saith that he is ashamed to tell the breadth of it lest it should give occasion to the heathen to blaspheme or deride it yet out of this small territory not so much as the principality of Wales with the Marches fourty eight walled Cities more then are in all England as I take it were assigned onely for their Clergy to dwell upon their maintenance and revenues being otherwise provided generally through the whole
Kingdome by Tithes oblations and other devotions of their brethren So that it is apparent both by the Law of God and Nature that God must have one portion of our Lands to build him an house on that is his Churches and another portion thereof for the habitation of his Levites that is his Ministers CAP. III. That the portion of Land assigned to God must be sufficient for the habitation of the Minister THough the portion of Land thus to be rendred to God for his Ministers be not certaine yet is it thus farre determined that it must be answerable to the necessity of the service and to the number of the Levites that is there must be Churches sufficient for the congregations and habitations sufficient for the Ministers and their families to dwell upon with pasture convenient for their domesticall cattell They must not be pulled from God with secular care and therefore their maintenance is appointed to arise by other meanes then by tilling the Earth but their habitation as befitteth students and men of contemplative life must be under their owne command and solitary But what should the portion of the fruites of the earth assigned them for their maintenance be certaine as namely the tenth part and not the portion of Land also allotted for their habitation I answer that as the people encrease so also the fruite of the earth encreaseth with them by their industry and labour and therefore as the Levites encrease in number so doe the rest of the Tribes and by reason thereof there is a greater encrease of Tithe toward the maintenance of the Levite for the labour of ten men yeeldeth more profit then the labour of five But when the Levites were inclosed within walls and confined with immutable bounds this circuite in reason could not alwaies be sufficient for them And therefore being so increased as their Cities might not containe them they must of necessity have new places of habitation provided for them For in such cases God gave a generall rule to the people Deut. 12.19 Beware that thou forsake not the Levite as long as thou linest in the Land And the people of the Jewes in this necessity did not forsake the Levites for before the transmigration to Babylon which was about 840. yeares after the Leviticall Cities as appeareth 1 Chron. cap. 6. and cap. 9.1 were growne to be about sixty eight viz. twenty more then were appointed by Josua They might not enlarge the bounds prescribed to their Cities but they might encrease the number of the Cities as the number of the Levites encreased and necessity required The reason is they might not adde house to house and field to field lest growing great in earthly possessions they should forget God who had otherwise provided for them then by manuring the earth but if they wanted habitations they might then seeke for new Cities and the care of the people was to provide them for them One Levite might not have more then sufficient for his habitation but if the Cities appointed were not sufficient to yeeld an habitation for every Levite then might they assigne new Cities to that purpose CAP. IV. That Christ released not the portion due to God out of our Lands THe possession of Lands is ex jure â—â—umino but the earth is the Lords ex jure divine Therefore when he granted the earth to the children of men and reserved a portion thereof for his service and Ministers this part thus reserved is in him and his Ministers ex jure divine In this right Christ calleth the Temple the house of God and saith also My house shall be on house of prayer And St. Paul saith 1 Crr. 11.22 Despise ye the house of God So that doubtlesse God must have houses for his forvice in all places where we inhabite But Christ had not wherein to lay his head Mat. 8.20 Luke 9.18 therefore the Ministers must have no houses provided for them for the disoiple is not above his master Christ indeed had not whereon to lay his head for he came to his owne and his owne received him not But doth this prove that Ministers should neither have nests in the ayre like birds nor holes in the ground like foxes Did not he that made the Vineyard in the Gospell build a tower in it for them that dressed it So like wise must the Ministers that attend upon the Vineyard of the Church have their habitations in it St. Paul appointed it so when he commandeth us to render a portion unto them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of all the good things Gal. 5.6 How have they a part in all if they want it in the chiefest of all that is in our habitations Againe he commandeth that they should be Hospitales Goodhouskeepers how should they be so if they have no houses to keep John Baptist lived in the wildernesse it is true and he was commended for it Christ did not so though he frequented the fields yet in that he gave no Commandement that his disciples should follow him for he appointed them to remaine in other mens houses What that they should goe sojourne where they listed The Commandement hath nothing to the contrary but the meaning is thereby apparent they must have habitations provided for them or else shake off the dust of your feet against them Mat. 10.14 as much as to say let them be accursed So then our Saviour hath not repealed the Law of providing for the Levites unto his Ministers He could not give them Cities to possesse for his kingdome was not of this world But he appointed them to such places as themselves should choose among the children of the Gospell Doeth this differ from the Commandement of providing Cities for the Levites Doubtles no for as the Logitians say Conveniunt in eodem tertio They agree in this that the Ministers must have habitations provided for them as well in the Gospell as the Levites had under the Law Oh but they must have no inheritance among their brethren for the Lord is their portion Numb 18.24 It is true the Lord hath communicated with them his owne portion viz. his tithes and his offerings as he did with the Levites therefore as the Levites had no share in the division of the Land so our Ministers must have no share with us in tilling the Land matters of husbandry for they are called from secular cares to spirituall contemplation but after the Israelites had their shares in the Land they yeelded portions to the Levites for their convenient residence and so must wee for our Ministers And so still the conclusion is they must be provided for Which to shut up the matter is invincibly ratified by our Saviour himselfe who in sending forth his disciples would not suffer them to take the least implements of sustenance with them because he would put them absolutely upon the care and charge of the congregation alledging a Maxime of the morall Law for warranty thereof that the