more ought Lay-men neither for they have a calling and Vocation wherein they are to walk as ministers have they have wise and children and families to care for and they are not to neglect these to live upon Warrants and Recognizances to become a kind of Sir Francis Michel or an Ignotus nimis as Salomon calls it That place 2 Tim. 2. 4. No man that wars entangles himself with the affairs of this life will be found to be applied by all good Interpreters to Laymen as well as Church-men and under favour nothing at all to this pupose Besides that the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth point at a man that is so wholly taken up with the affairs of this life that he utterly neglects the offices and duties of a Christian man and so I leave that place as uncapable of any other exposition nor ever otherwise interpreted but by Popes Legars and Canonists that make a Nose of Waxe of every place of Scripture they touch upon But that men in holy orders ought not in a moderate manner together with the duties of their calling to help and assist in the Government of the Common-wealth if they be thereunto lawfully called by the Soveraign prince can never be proved by any good divinity For in the law of nature before the Deluge and a long time after it is a point that no man will deny me that the eldest of the Family was both the priest and the magistrate Then the people were taken out of Egypt by Moses and Aaron Moses and Aaron amongst his Priests as it is in the psalm Then there was a form of a Common-wealth fetcht from heaven indeed and planted upon the earth and Iudiciary laws dictated for the reiglement of the same Nor do I much care though some men shall say that persons in holy orders ought not to intermedâ—le in secular affairs when that great God of heaven and earth doth appoint them to intermeddle with all the principal affairs of that estate witnesse the exorbitant power of the High priest in secular matters the Sanedrim the 23. the Judges of the Gate which were the most of them Priests and Levites And the Church-men of that estate were not all Butchers and Slaughter-men For they had their Tabernacle their Synagogues their Prayers Preaching and other exercises of piety In a word we have Divinius but they had operosius ministerium as St Augustin speaketh Our Ministry takes up more of our thoughts but theirs took up more of their Labours and Industry Nor is it any matter that this Common-wealth is no more in beingâ— in sufficeth it hath been once and that planted by God himself who would never have appointed persons in holy orders to intermeddle with things they ought not to intermedle withall I will go on with my Chronology of persons in holy orders and only put you in mind of Ely and Samuel amongst the Judges of Sadocks imployment under King David of Iehojadas under his Nephew King Ioash and would fain know what hurt those men in holy orders did by intermedling in secular affairs of that time Now we are returned from the Captivity of Babylon I desire you to look upon the whole race of the Macchabees even to Antigonus the last of them all taken prisoner by Pompey and crucified afterwards by Mark Anthony And shew me any one of those Princes a woman or two excepted that was not a Priest and a Magistrate We are now come to Christs time when me thinks I hear St. Paul in the 23. of the Acts excuse himself for reviling of the high priest I wist not Brethren that he was the high priest for it is written Thou shalt not speak evil of the Ruler of thy people Where observe that the word Ruler in the Greek is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the very same word that is used by St. Paul Rom. 13. 3. where this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is translated by Peza Magistrates Then you must be pleased to imagine the Church asleep or almost dead under rersecution for almost 300. years until the happy days of the Emperor Constantine and not expect to find many Magistrates among the Christians Yet shall you find St. Paul 1 Cor. 6. 5. offend against this Bill and intermeddle knuckle-deep with secular affairs by inhibiting the Corintbians very sharply for their Chicanery their petty-foggery and Common battery in going to Law one with another Besides that as all learned men agree both the Apostles and Apostolical men that lived presently after them had a miraculous power of punishing exorbitant crimes which supplied the power of the ordinary Magistrate as appears in Ananias and Saphyra the incestuous Corinthian and many others But then from Constantines age till the Reformation begun by Luther Church-men were so usually imployed in managing of secular affairs that I shall confesse ingenuously that it was too much there lying an appeal from the Courts of the Empire to the Bishops judicatory as you shall find it every where in the Code of Iustinian So was it under Carolus Magnus and all the Carolovingian Line of our neighbour Country of France So and somewhat more it was with us in the Saxon Heptarchy the Bishop and the Sheriffe sitting together cheek by joule in their Towns and Courts But these exorbitant and vast imployments in secular affairs I stand not up to defend and therefore I will hasten to the Reformation Whereas Mr. Calvin in the Fourth Book of his Institutions and eleventh Distinction doth confesse that the holy men heretofore did refer their Controversies to the Bishop to avoid troubles in Law you shall find that from Luther to this present day in all the Fluxe of time in all Nations in all manner of Reformations persons in holy orders were thought fit to intermeddle with secular affairs Brentius was a privy Counsellour to his Duke and Prince Functius was a Privy Counsellour to the great Duke of Borussia as it is too notoriously known to those that are vers'd in Histories Calvin and Beza whilst they lived carried all the Council of the State of Geneva under their own Gowns Bancroft in his Survey cap. 26. observeth that they were of the Councel of State there which consisteth of threescore And I have my self known Abraham Sculteius a privy Councellour to the Prince Palatine Reverend Mousieur du Moulin for many years together a Councellour to the Princesse of Sedan His Brother in Law Mounsieur Rivel a great learned personage now in England of the Privy Councel of the Prince of Orange You all hear and I know much good by his former writings of a learned man called Mr. Henderson and most of your Lordships understand better then I what imployment he hath at this time in his kingdome And truly I do beleive that there is no reformed Church in the World setled and constituted by the State wherein it is held for a point in divinity that persons in holy orders ought not to intermeddle with secular affairs
the Judges But Ministers have no remedy to help themselves there being none of the Clergy upon the Bench in any authority CHAP. II. Of the Government of the Church and State of Israel by Moses and Aaron and their Successors until Christ about 1500 years That there were not two several Iurisdictions one Ecclesiastical the other Civil WHen God delivered his chosen people out of Aegypt and conducted them through the Wildernesse towards the promised Land of Canaan He began first to publish his Law And by Moses delivered them many Laws in Five Books Whatsoever Lawes he gave either moral ceremonial or Judicial they are all contained in the Five books of Moses and no man could better understand them then the Priests and Levites For God made his Covenant with Levy of Life and Peace The Law of Truth was in his mouth The Priests Lips should preserve knowledge and they should seek the Law at his Mouth Mal. 2. 5 6 7. and so Ezekiel 44. 23. They shall teach my people the difference between the Holy and prophane and cause them to discern between the unclean and the clean and in Controversie they shall stand in judgement and they shall judge according to my Iudgements and they shall keep my Lawes and my Statutes in all mine Assemblies They being the principal Judges and Lawyers in that Common-wealth of Gods own Constitution And whereas it is now granted on all hands that there were three Courts of Justice in that Kingdome 1. The great Council of the 70. Elders 2. The Court of Judgement which was in in every good Town where there were many families 3. The Court of three or some few more The Priests and Levites were principal men both Judges and Officers in all Courts Scophtim Scoterim as 1. Chron. 23. 4. both to give sentence and judgement and also to execute the same So the Divines do affirm in their late Annotations upon 1. Chron. 26. 29 30. 2. Chron. 19. 8. 11. They did study the Judicial and politick Laws and had power to see the Law of God and Injunctions of the King to be observed and to order divine and humane affairs And they held also other honourable offices for we read that Zechariah a Levite was a wise Counsellour and Benjah a Priest Son of Iehojadah was one of Davids twelve Captains being the third Captain of the Host for the third month and in his course consisting of 24000. was his Son Amizabad Benjah also was one of Davids principal worthies having the name of the three mighties He was also Captain of the guard to David and after the Death of Ioab he was made Lord General of the Army by King Salomon in Ioabs room 1. K. 2. 35. It is recored 1 Chron. 26. 30. That of the Family of the Hebronists Levites there were a thousand and seven hundred Officers on this side Iordan westward in all businesses of the Lord and in the service of the King and two thousand and seven hundred chief Fathers and men of valour whom King David made Rulers over the Reâ—bonists the Gaditeâ—s and the half Tribe of Manasses for every matter pertaining to God and affairs of the King v. 31. 32. Whereby it manifestly appears that the same Judges and Officers being Priests and Levites most of them did hear and determine all sorts of causes pertaining to God and affairs of the King both Ecclesiastical and Temporal so that there was not several Courts the one Ecclesiastical and the other Civil as in these times some do affirm too peremptorily according to the Common practise and usage of these days as Godwin in his Moses and Aaron lib. 5. Beza Iunius and divers others with the Kirkmen of Scotland lately Rutherford Gillespie Baily and others So also the Papists generally who that they may establish the Popes Supremacy above Kings and their Common-laws do affirm that Regimen Ecclesiasticum est distinctum a politico as Bellarmine de Romano pontifice lib. 1. cap. 5. so our zealous party for the like ends and reasons would maintain a Government in the Clergy seperate from and independent upon the Civill Magistrate and such as ought to be directed and ruled only by the word of God and his Spirit ruling as they suppose in their classical Assemblies where they think the Throne of Christ is only to be advanced and all his holy Ordinances put in execution Whereas the King is Custos utriusqne tabulae and the Supremacy in causes Ecclesiastical as well as Temporal is acknowledged by our Statutes and annexed to the Crown For Execution thereof an Act was made 1. Eliz. cap. 1. But if the Statute had not been made to annexe the Supremacy to the Crown yet as the Lord Cook saith 4. Instit. p. 331. King Iames hath and Queen Elizabeth had before him as great and ample Supremacy and Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical ase ver King of England had before them and that had justly and rightly pertained to them by divers other Acts and by the ancient Law of England if the said clause of annexation in the said Statute 1. Eliz. had never been inserted But Iohn Pym in his Speech in Parliament 4. Caroli as Rushworth hath it in his late Collections saith that the high Commission was derived from the Parliament As if the Parliament gave the King the Supremacy as a gift of their own and that it was not vested in the Crown but as they gave it so they may take it away when they please and suppresse the Court of high Commission as they have done The duty of the Court was to reform and correct all Heresies Schismes Abuses Offences Contempts and Enormities But now upon Suppression of the Court all Heresies and Schismes in the world are broke out and such abominable abuses offences and enormities as never were known in this Kingdome with allowance and toleration This follow 's upon the new light and doctrine of Iohn Pym and all the rest of the Presbyterians who have stirred up all these troubles and of late they called the House of Commons the Supream power of the Nation in all Addresses and Petitions made unto them It was a great Error of Calvin and Beza and many others that follow them to affirm that there was one Court Ecclesiastical and another Civil in Israel Calvin upon Ieremiah 19. 1. pag. 152. saith Scimus duos fuisse ordines publicos vel duplex regimen ut loquuntur sacerdotes erant praefecti Ecclesiae nempe quoad legem ita ut spiritualis esset eorum gubernatio erant seniores populi qui prae erant rebus politicis utriusque vero quaedam inter se communio Calvin understood only the plain Hebrew not the Rabbins and Talmud nor the Jewish Antiquities Therefore in several places he is mistaken as upon Numb 11. 17. Where God appointed first the 70. Elders to be joyned as Assistants to Moses He doth interpret the Text I will take off the Spirit that is upon thee and put
and Piety was fervent and abounded with good works of all kinds insomuch that they thought no honour or respect too much to be given to the Clergy especially to the reverend Fathers and Bishops of the prime order From what hath been said it is manifest that the Bishops were equal to the greatest persons and estates of the Kingdome and had their votes and suffrages for making laws and Constitutions for the first 500. years before the Conquest Whereby it appears that it is a very rash and ignorant assertion of the Examiner Dr. Burgesse That Bishops at first were but casually mounted to that height of extent and power by William the Conquerour the more to endear and oblige them And that it is onely of Grace that Bishops were first allowed place in Parliament And that they crept in by favour to serve a Conquerours turn and can derive no higher for sitting as now they do in the House of Peers then an Act of Parliament if so high Whereby it is manifest by all the Laws of the Saxon Kings both in the edition of Lambard and of the English Councels by Sir Henry Spelman that the Bishops were the principal men in all ages for ordaining of Laws and Consulâ—ations in all the great Assemblies of the Kingdome then in use And when matters in question were only Ecclesiasticall concerning the Church and Religion the Clergy sate by themselves but when there was any thing to be given and confirmed to the Church then the Kings and Nobles did afford their presence and assistance as appears by divers Councils Vide Concil Glocestriensiae pag. 230. CHAP. V. Concerning Barons and the Title thereof and how the Bishops became Barons being no addition of Honour to them but inforced upon them by the Conquerour and since continued to this day AS for the Title and Original of Barons and the old signification of the Word Selden in his Titles of Honor 2. part cap. 7. Especially Sir Henry Spelman in his learned Glossary upon the word Baro hath so accurately shewed divers particulars that I need not here repeat them But touching the Title and Name as it is now commonly used I will say something as it is now understood it came among us since the Conquest as the Glossary sheweth pag. 81. Ad Anglos pervenisse videtur vocabulum Baro vel cum ipsis Normanis vel cum Edwardus Confessor auras moresque imbibisset Normannicos Huntingtoniensis aevi sui vocabulum usurpans Histor. lib. 5. Adolwaldum qui occisus est An. Dom. 903 Baronem Regis Edwardi senioris vocat sed Author antiquior Florentius Wigorniensis eundem Ministrum Regis appellat quo etiam vocabulo scriptores ipsi Saxonici passim usi sunt So in the Saxon Councils and Charters divers great men who were no lesse then Thanes do style and subscribe themselves Ministros Regis as in the Charter of Edgar p. 486. Ego Oswald minister confirmavi Ego Elfwurde minister corroboravi And the like frequently occure These being the same in degree and substance as Barons are now whereof the Learned Glossary maketh three sorts Hodiernos itaque nostros Barones è triplici fonte triplices faciamus 1. Feodales seu praescriptitios qui a priscis feodalibus Baronibus oriundi suam hodie praescriptione tuentur dignitatem 2. Evocatos seu rescriptitios qui brevi Regio ad Parliamentum evocantur 3. Diplomaticos qui Regio Diplomate hoc fastigium ascendunt Feodalium originem inter eos collocavero quibus Willielmus senior Angliam totam dispertitus est de se tenendam quorumque nomina in Domesdei paginis recognovit Rescriptitios ab aevo Regum Iohannis Henrici tertii caput extulisse censeo Diplomaticos initium sumpsisse perhibent sub Richardo secundo qui anno Regni sui 8. 1. Christi 1387 Iohannem Beauchamp de Hall in Baronem de Kinderminster suo evexit diplomate Now the Bishops may be reckoned both as Feudal Barons in regard of their estates and Baronies annexed to their Bishopricks and also they are Evocati summoned by Writ as Barons and principal persons by the Kings to come unto Parliaments and also they are created by Patent which is presented to the Arch-bishop at their consecration But all the Feudal Barons were not summoned to Parliaments Quorum ingens erat multitudo quae plus minus 30000. nullo tecto convocari poterat William the Conquerour brought in Tenures inforcing all men of estates to hold by one Tenure or other and having made 30 thousand to hold by Barony yet he never called so many to a Parliament seeing no Houses could hold so many and as not all the Feudal Barons were called so not all the Abbots or Priors though they had great estates but a convenient number sometimes more and sometimes lesse as in 49. Hen. 3. Which is the first Parliament upon Record there were called to Parliament of the Clergy 102. besides five Deans saith Spelman Glossary pag. 4. Anno. 1. Edw. 2. there were 36. Abbots Anno. 4. Edw. 3. about 33. and all other times more or lesse Yet not so few as the Examiner relateth out of Sir Edward Cook pag. 33. who though he were a great Master of law yet in matters of Antiquity must yeild to the Author of the Glossary whom in private he would call his Tutor as well he might Cambden writing of the Degrees of States in England pag. 170. speaking of the Bishops by right and custome it appertained to them as to Peers of the Kingdome to be with the rest of the Peers personally present at all Parliaments whatsoever there to consult to handle to ordain decree and determine in regard of the Baronies which they hold of the King For William the first a thing which the Church-men of that time complained of but these in the age ensuing counted their greatest honour ordained Bishopricks and Abbeys which held Baronies in pure and perpetual almes and until that time were free from all secular service to be under Military or Knights Service enrolling every Bishoprick and Abbey at his will and pleasure and appointed how many Soldiers he would have every of them to find for him and his Successours in the time of Hostility and War Thus William the Conquerour being very rigorous imposed upon the Bishops and Abbots that held their estates by Barony great impositions to maintain arms horses and furniture for War enrolling them as he thought them able but it seems the lesser Abbeys that did not hold by that Tenure of Barony and Parish priests were not taxed as now they are But under the Saxons when the grievous imposition of Dangelt was imposed and raised from ten thousand pounds yearly to thirty thousand pounds and in the year 1012. to forty eight thousand pounds which was a great sum for that age when mony did not abound as it doth now yet the Church was then free De hoc Dangeldo libera quieta erat omnis Ecclesia quiâ— magis in Ecclesiae
Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same ordaineth establisheth and enacteth that from henceforth the same evection and making of the same Duke and all the Names of dignity to the said George or to Iohn Nevil befor henceforth void and of none effect c. And much more the Lord Cook addeth to the same purpose as also York the Herald pag. 223. The late Lord Brook who was slain at Lichfield when he was ready to batter the Cathedral Church in his book against Bishops speaking much against them and magnifying the Temporal Barons saith that though their Honours are derived from the King yet being once made Lord their Honour is vested in their blood and cannot be taken away but his Lordship was not learned in Law or Herauldry He might have taken notice what Lord Bacon saith in his Apopthegmes That blood is no better then the blood of a black Pudding that wants Fat and Suet Honour is vested in the lands Mannors and Revenues which when they are lost and gone farewell Honour and Title Edward Lord Cromwell Grandchild to him that spoyl'd the Church sold the head of his Barony Oukham in Rutland and wasting his whole estate left himself as little land in England as his Grandfather left to the Monasteries by the Feudal Law his Barony is lost The last Edward Lord Zouch who dyed 1. Caroli who was a very great Baron anciently sold the Head of his Barony Haringworth in Northampton-shire and all the Lands which he had insomuch that Henry Howard Earl of Northampton said He was a Baron sans terre Whereupon he bought again some other lands but having no Sons his Barony his extinct Henry Daubeny Earl of Bridgewater created 20. Iuly 30. H. 8. dyed without Issue Anno ... Edw. 6. and so his Name Family and Dignity extinct This Earl was reduced to that extream poverty that he had not a servant to wait on him in his last sicknesse nor means to buy Fire or Candles or to bury him but all was done for him in Charity of his Sister Cicely married to Iohn Bourchier the first of that name Earl of Bath Many more might be alleadged but these are enough to shew that when Lords have lost their Lands and Revenues then they are not fit men to fit and vote in Parliament and many there are who though noâ— wholly impoverished yet so decayed that they are not so fit as the Bishops to be present in Parliaments who if they might have enjoyed their ancient Lands and Mannors were indeed the most able and worthy to be Members in Parliament both in regard of their great estates and their Knowledge and Learning in all kinds far beyond the Temporal Lords Lastly Whereas Dr. Burgesse saith the Bishops are Barones Eleâ—mosynarii and would thence infer that they are but as Arbitrary Almsmen like the poor Knights of Windsor who may be abated or taken away at pleasure This is but a spightful inference upon the bare word Eleemosyna without the true sense of it For as the Learned Glossary sheweth Barones Eleemosynarii apud Stanfordum in jure nostro dicuntur Archiepiscopi Episcopi Abbates Priores qui praedia suae Ecclesia a Rege tenent per Baroniam Baronias etiam suas ex Eleemosyna Regum perhibentur accepisse licet ipsa praedia aliorum saepe munificentia consequuti fuerint And sometimes not only by the gift of other noble persons but also themselves did buy and purchase many Mannors and Lands conferring them on their Successours and being so bought they cannot in justice be taken away as if all had been given by the King and others as meer Alms. Lanfranck Arch-bishop of Canterbury bought and recovered 25. Mannors and left them to his Successors Harvey the first Bishop of Ely in the time of Hen. 7. bought and left many Mannors to his Successors and so likewise did many other Bishops enriching much their Bishopricks and leaving besides many testimonies of their piety by building Colledges and Hospitals And other good works to the benefit of all men They founded also almost all the Colledges in both Universities to their eternal honor so long as Learning shall flourish in this Kingdome CHAP. VI. Concerning the Legislative power and Votes of the Bishops in making Laws Concerning the Statute 11. H. 7. Whereby Empson and Dudley proceeded and what great Treasures they brought to the King Calvin and Beza at Geneva were Members of their Chief Council of State consisting of 60. and so many Bishops in England be Members in Parliament King David appointed Priests and Levites in all Courts of Iustice. The Clergy had many priviledges as Lord Cooke sheweth upon Magna Charta 2. Instit. pag. 2 3. Ambition and Covetousnesse of the Presbyterians the principal cause of all our Troubles BUt concerning the Legislative power and Votes of Bishops in making Laws to regulate the Kingdome and to preserve peace and justice among all sorts of men there is not to be forgotten an ancient Law of King Athelstan Concil pag. 402. c. 11. That worthy King in his Laws hath one De Officio Episcopi quid pertinet ad Officium ejus Episcopo jure pertinet omnem rectitudinem promovere Dei scilicet ac seculi imprimis debet omnem ordinatum Dei instruere quid ei jure sit agendum quid secularibus judicare debeat Debet enim sedulo pacem concordiam operari cum seculi judicâ—bus qui rectum velle diligunt in compellationum adlegationem docere ne quis alii perperam agat in jurejurando vel in â—rdalio Nec pati debet aliquam circumventionem injustae mensurae vel injusti ponderis sed convenit ut per Consilium Testimonium ejus omne legis scitum Burgi mensura omne pondus ponderis sit secundum ejus institutum valde rectum Ne quis proximum suum seducat pro quo decidat in peccatum Et semper debet Christianus providere contra â—mnia quae praedicta sunt ideo debet se magis de pluribus intromittere ut sciat quomodo grex agat quem ad Dei manum custodire suscept ne diabolus eum laniet nee malum aliquid super seminet c. Christianis omnibus necessarium est ut rectum diligant iniqua condemnent saltem sacris ordinibus evecti justum semper erigant prava deponant Hinc debent Episcopi cum secularibus judicibus interesse judiciis ne permittant si pessint ut illius culpa aliqua pravitatum germina pullulaverint Et sacerdotibus pertinet in sua diocaesi ut ad rectum sedulo quemcumque juvent nee patiantur si possint ut Christianus aliquis alii noceat non potens impotenti non summus infimo non praelatus subditis non dominus hominibus suis vel servis aut liberis molestus existat secundum Episcopi dictionem per suam mensuram convenit ut servi testamentales operentur super omnem
So Dr. Burgesse termeth the Learned Dr. Davenant Bishop of Salisbury only a speculative Divine He being an eminent and principal Divine Head of Queens Colledge in Cambridge and publick Professor and chosen by King Iames to be sent to the Synod of Dort and by his Learned works publickly famous and renowned Such malapert language against such Honourable and eminent Bishops from an inferiour Doctor is not to be endured without sharp censures Now though some Canons may seem to forbid the Bishops and Clergy to intermeddle with secular affairs yet that is not absolutely forbidden but in a qualified sense as in the famous Council of Clâ—veshoe under Cuthbert Archbishop of Canterbury Anno 747. Can. 1. Negotiis secularibus plusquà m Dei servitiis quod absit subditus existit To attend secular affairs more then spiritual and to be wholly imployed and conversant in Temporal matters without due regard to the better part But it will not hinder sacred studies nor the diligent preaching of the Gospel that some principal men at convenient times have a charge and over-sight of Temporal affairs and the carriage of publick businesse And concerning this see more in Bishop Davenants Determinations at Cambridge Quest. 11. Civilis jurisdictio jure conceditur personis Ecclesiasticis Thus much might serve for Reply to the Examiner Dr. Burgesse especially upon the fifth reason which I hold to be the only thing material in the whole Discourse for the rest will appear to be needlesse if this be clear'd But if he would look back to former times he shall find that our Kingdome and Government followed the ancient manner of Gods own people of Israel whose Ceremonies and Rituals though they be now abolished yet the general rules of Justice Equity Government and Order do still remain And as God made the priesthood then honourable in the Kingdome of Israel and committed a great part of the Government unto them so doubtlesse now under the Gospel the priesthood ought to be Honourable and to have a principal part in the ruling and governing of the Kingdome To be a Priest in Israel was to be a cheif man Levit 21. 4. and therefore in all their Courts of Justice the priests and Levites were cheif men in authority for deciding all causes both in the great Court of Sanedrim at Ierusalem which was a Continuation of the 70. Elders appointed by God himself Numb 11. and was answerable in authority to our Parliaments it being the highest Court of Judicature in that Kingdome and so in the second Court of Judgement as our Saviour calleth it Mat. 5. 22. where there were 23 Judges whereof 7. were of the Laity as we now call them Elders of the Cities and every good City consisted of _____ Families unto which 7. of the Elders there were added 14 Priests and Levites as Iosephus sheweth lib. 4. cap. 8. where though he seem to say that the number of the Judges was seven yet if his next words following be well observed he sheweth the addition of two priests and Levites to each of the other Magistrates of the people 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Nam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 intellig it singulos magistratum gerentes quibus singulis bini erant additi adsessores periti juris quos Iosephus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vocat Septem ergo municipes loci erant judices praeterea adsessores quatuordecim qui ex Levitis maxime sumebantur his supernumer arii accessisse videntur unus alter So Grotius in Mat. 5. 21. and so also the English Translation doth render the place In every City or Township let there be seven Governours such as are approved in vertue and famous for their Justice and let each of these Magistrates have two Ministers of the Tribe of Levi. In this Court of Judgement all manner of causes were heard of Life and Death whatsoever matters of Controversie within their gates Ecclesiastical or Temporal Yet excepting some weighty businesses concerning a whole Tribe or the high priest or a false Prophet which belonged only to the great Council at Ierusalem Whether also they might appeal in any doubtful cause which was too difficult for the inferiour Courts Iudices in portis cujusque Civitatis jus super causis majoribus reddebant in homicidas lege agere solebant de quibus agitur Deutr. 16 18. 21 22. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 autem paena erat gladius quia de homicidis inibi cognoscebatur ut Moses nos docet Christus Grotius in Mat. 5. 21. When King David was old and neet his Death he appointed Salomon to be King after him and caused a Parliament of all Israel to be assembled wherein he gathered together all the Princes of Israel with the Priests and Levites 1 Chr 24 1. 2. In this great Parliament the priests and Levites were not omitted not in any Court of Justice in that Kingdome For as it is p. 4. There were six thousand of them appointed Officers and Judges throughout the land of Israel which is the thing that now many of our Common people do much dislike not well induring a few Justices of Peace to be of the Clergy whereas we have the example of David guided and directed by the Spirit of God as the Text saith 1 Chron. 28 12 13 19. So disposing and ordering the Levites that he appointed some for the outward businesse over Israel for Officers and Judges a thousand and seven hundred were Officers of Israel on this side Iordan in all businesses of the Lord and in the service of the King This Text is very plain to prove that the same man may be employed in Ecclesiastical matters of the Church as also in the Kings Service So pag. 32. David appointed two thousand and seven hundred cheif Fathers to be Rulers over the Reubenites Gadites and the half Tribe of Manasses who were beyond Iordan for every matter pertaining to God and affairs of the King and c. 26. 14. Zecharias a Levite is commended for a wise Counsellour But that now any of the Clergy should be Councellours Judges or Officers unto Princes is accounted by some an unlawful thing or at least not very commendable Whereas we see by this very law and direction of King David that the Levites might attend businesse belonging to the worship and service of God and instruction of the people as also of the publick service and affairs of King and State So the Divines in their late Annotations on the Bible do acknowledge that the Levites did study the Judicial and politick Laws and had power to see the law of God and injunctions of the King to be observed and to order divine and humane affairs 1 Chron. 26. 29 30. 2 Chron. 19. 8 11. So the Learned Grotius Sicut lex erat uan praeptrix divini omnis humanique juris ita apud Hebraeos penes eosdem erat juris utriusque interpretatio Upon Mal. 2. 4. and so other Commentaries do affirm as Lavater in cap. 23. Per
God as they pronounced or prescribed Thus the reverend and Learned Bishop Bilson in his perpetual Government cap. 4. Besides in every City there were private and peculiar Rulers 21. in number as Iosephus saith and also to every Magistracy in those Cities there was allotted two of the Tribe of Levi for assistance as Iosephus witnesseth and if those could not determine the busâ—nesse then they did appeal to the great Council And so Grotius sheweth most accurately upon Mat. 5. 21. Now God appointed these offices and dignities and power of Judicature to the Priests and Levites besides their attendance upon Gods service and the Course of every Priest and Levite was but one Week in half a year to attend at the Temple as Iosephus and Scaliger and Selianus doth shew with other accurate Chronologers so that beside their attendance upon Gods Service they had time and leisure enough to be helpful in the Government of the Kingdome Yea sometimes the principal Judges were chosen out of the Tribe of Levi as at the beginning of their Common-wealth Moses himself of that Tribe the greatest prophet prince that ever was among them So after in succeeding times Ely the high Priest was made Judge in his time So also Samuel a Levite was cheif Judge in Israel as 1 Sam. 7. 15. who judged Israel all the dayes of his life And he went from year to year in circuit to Bethell and Gilgal and Mispeh and judged Israel in all those places much alike as our judges do go their Circuits every year throughout the Land p. 17. And his return was to Ramah for there was his House and there he judged Israel and there he built an Altar to the Lord. And his three Sons after him Samuel made them being Levites Iudges over Israel though they did not walk in their Fathers ways but turned aside after lucre and took bribes and perverted judgement After the Captivity of Babylon for some 500 years till the coming of Christ the Priesthood had the greatest stroke in the Government As Ezra the Priest and brother to Iesus the high priest that returned from the Captivity whose memory is honourable among the righteous as learned Montague sheweth against Selden pag. 377. He had Commission from the Persian Emperor Artaxerxes to govern and order the Controversie Ezra 7. 12 25. and gave him authority to set Magistrates and judges which might judge the people and power to execute the laws of God and the King pag. 26. and to inflict punishments unto death or banishment or to confiscation of goods or imprisonment So that Ezra had great authority and full power given him and his worthy Acts are there recorded So afterwards under the Maehabees who were priests the Common-wealth was governed and it pleased God to make that Family victorious as any other almost that ever governed that Common-wealth as Sir Walter Raleigh sheweth lib. 2. cap. 15. If thus it were anciently among the chosen people of God why then should any in these dayes be so much displeased that a Bishop or a Clergy man should have any part in the Government of the Common-wealth or assistance of Government for the better Ordering and Directing of judgment or to be Counsellor to a Prince as Zechariah the Levite was a wise Counsellor 1 Chron. 26. 14. Benajah a Priest son of Iehojadah was one of David's twelve Captaines being the third Captain of the host for a moneth and in his Course consisting of 2400 was his son Amizabad Benajah also was of David's principal Worthies having the name among the three Mighties He was also Captain of the guard to David and after the death of Ioab he was made Lord General of the Host by King Solomon in Ioabs room 1 Kings 22. 35. So and much rather may a Clergy men now be an Officer in great place or a Justice of Peace in the Country who handles Matters of Equity and good Conscience for preserving of publick peace order and quietness among neighbours wherein happen many businesses that depend much upon the Conscience of a Justice and the Equitable rules of Scripture whereof Clergy men are the most competent interpreters As also many Causes happen touching the Estates and persons of the Clergy who have little reason to be subject onely to secular Judges without some of their own tribe on the bench to see fair carriage and indifferent dealing But for matters of Religion concerning God and his Worship and difficult points of Divinity the Clergy then were and so ought now to be the principal men to be imployed as may clearly appear by the doings of K. David about removing of the Ark to the place that he had provided for it upon which text King Iames hath written a very pious and excellent Meditation Pag. 81. upon the 1 Chron. 15. some of those words are fit to be here recited When the Ark of God whereunto they sought not in the dayes of Saul had continued long at Kiriah-jearim David out of his Zeal and Piety was moved to prepare a Tent for it in the City of David and when he began to remove it he called a great assembly of principal Men but did not make that use of the Priests and Levites as he ought to have done and therefore the Action prospered not but there happened a terrible judgment upon Uzzah which hindered the progresse of the good work and David was afraid of God that day saying How shall I bring the Ark of God home to me so the Ark rested in the House of Obed-Edom But afterwards upon better advice David perceived his Errour and confesseth it Cap. 15. 12 13. Speaking to the Chief of the Priests and Levites Sanctify your selves both ye and your brethren that you may bring up the Ark of the Lord God For because you did it not at the first the Lord God made a breach upon us for we sought him not after the due order This was a great and a godly work that was then intended and therefore King David called a great Assembly about it 1. Of the Elders of Israel 2. Of the Captaines of thousands and hundreds whose Names and Praises are recorded 3. The Priests and Levites Who did it not at the first But now upon better advice King David assembled at first the Children of Aaron and the Levites v. 4. So that men of all Estates were now present in this godly work This is to be marked well of Princes and of all those of any high Calling or Degree that have to do in Gods Cause David doth nothing in matters pertaining to God without the presence and especiall Concurrence of Gods Ministers appointed to be spiritual rulers in Gods Church And at the first meant to convay the same Ark to Ierusalem finding their absence and want of their Counsel hurtful therefore he saith to them Ye are the Chief Fathers of the Levites because ye did it not at the first Thus saith King Iames of blessed memory but
the present practise and Law confirmed by the continual practise of many hundred years The Law being thus made by the Conquerour to separate the Ecclesiastical Court from the Temporal there followed after in succeeding times Statutes to direct and appoint what causes shall belong to the Bishops Jurisdiction As the Statute called Circumspecte agatis made 13. Edw. 1. and Articuli Cleri 9. Edw. 2. which besides others Coke doth expound in the 2. Instit. at large pag. 489. 599. So that the Ecclesiastical Laws and Courts being thus setled by ancient Statutes and Magna Charta and besides long use and Custome the Laws are Fundamental and necessary as well as any part of the Common-law and cannot be wholly taken away without great injustice confusion and great disorder in the Kingdome and Church as it happen'd most pitifully in these troublesome times But Parliaments are obliged to maintain the Fundamental Laws of the Land as they have often professed solemnly in many of their Declarations Protestations and Remonstrances But in conclusion they have overthrown all Ecclesiastical Courts and Laws though never so ancient and Fundamental and now they would pretend to set up new laws and orders which they call Presbyterian Government by Lay Elders in every Parish a fond and foolish project contrary to the Laws of God and Man such as they have heard to be at Geneva and some other places beyond Sea where there are no Lords Knights Esquires or Gentlemen as with us in England But their new States are popular without degrees of Honour and distinction of Gentry They do as their Neighbours at Strasborough and the Switzers of whom Bodin saith lib. 6. c. 4. Argentinenses Caesa prostrata nobilitate cum imperium populare invasissent legem communibus suffragiis tulerant ne quis summos in Civitate Magistratus adipisceretur nisi a cerdonibus aut coriariis aut id genus sordidis opificibus stirpem traxisset idenim veteribus Grâ—cis usit atum erat ut in iis civitatibus quae popularia imperia stabilire ac tueri vellent cives omnes quantum quidem fieri posset opibus honoribus imperiis ac vitae conditione exaequarent ac si quis prudentia justitia fortitudine aut ulla virtute caeteris praeluceret ac emineret hunc ostracismo exterminabant aut ne virtutitam aperte bellum indicere viderentur accusationibus calumniis opprimebant atque id unum efficere conabantur ut singuli Cives non magis sui similes essent quam omnes omnium They either banished or put to death all their Nobility and so made themselves a popular state and further made a law that no man should bear any publick office among them but such as would derive their Discent and Pedegree from some base Trade a Cobler or Carrior or such like Among such people Presbyterian Government may be better allowed then in a Kingdome flourishing with all degrees of Honour Dukes Marquesses Earls Barons Knights c. But where only Tradesmen are chapmen Pedâ—ars and Artificers as they are at Geneva there any government in the Church may better be tolerated then in a Monarchy The Glossary sheweth to that purpose that Tradesmen are base fellows in Herauldry and among base fellows any base government may serve the turn Burgenses Mercatores sunt sordidum hominum genus as Tully said Burgenses dum cauponandis mercibus rei Mechanicae navarent generosae turbae militiam omnino admiranti despectui erant adeo ut cum illis nec connubia jungerent nec Martis aleam experirentur and so also the Civil law saith patritii cum Plebeis conjugia ne contrahunto And in our law it is reputed a disparagement for a Ward in Chivalry which in old time was as much as to say a Gentleman to be married to the Daughter of one that dwelt in a Burrough as Lambard sheweth in his perambulation of Kent pag. 504. So the old Statute of Merton Anno Dom. 1235. cap. 7. De Dominis qui maritaverint illos quos habent in custodia sua Villanis aliis sicut Burgensibus ubi disparagentur c. Lord Coke sheweth what causes belong to the Court Christian viz. Probate of Wills and Testaments Legacies Reparation of Churches and Church-yards Tyths Oblations Mortuaries and such like duties Matrimonial causes degrees of Affinity or Consanguinity Divorces and what else belongeth thereunto And divers other particulars as appears in divers statutes and the Books of the Civil Lawyers as punishment of Adultery Fornication and Incontinency Incest with many other the like as Heresies Schismes Errors Abuses Offences Contempts and enormities as Lord Coke saith 4. Instit. pag. 325. and so also the excellently learned Lawyer Dr. Cosin Dean of the Arches in his Apology for Ecclesiastical Courts and their proceedings against Simony Usury Defamation Sacriledge Disapidations c. But now the Presbyterians neglect and cast off most of these particulars that there is no punishment for those gross offences and sins which are not fit to be mentioned among Christians saith the Apostle There is of late an infinite number of bastards gotten and the Justices of peace only take care for keeping the Bastard But there is no punishment or correction for the scandal to Religion and the vulgar people go together like Dogs and Bitches without licence or publication of banes in any parish The Holy Communion is cast aside and neglected in most parishes most shamefully The Common-people in most parishes will rather be without the Sacrament then give one penny to buy Bread and Wine for it that they are become Atheists in most places and many Sectaries professe publickly that they will not have Churches or Stone-houses nor Ministers or Magistrates And yet the Parliament pretended to reform all according to the word of God in all things to advance the Throne of Christ and the Tribunal of Christ with all his holy ordinances in full force and power as the Language is of the Presbyterian Ministers CHAP. VIII Some Observations out of the Civil Law in the Empire concerning the separation of Courts and some also out of the ancient Statutes as Selden hath related them Lord Cooks Defence of the Bishops being in Parliament and of the Convocation and High Commission and other Ecclesiastical Courts AS the Courts Ecclesiastical and Temporal were separated in our Kingdome so anciently there was some such division in the Empire yet the Emperour gave great power and authority to the Ecclesiastical Judges according to that which Iustinian saith of spiritual Causes in the Novell 123. si pro Criminal si Ecclesiasticum negotium sit â—ullam Communionem habento Civiles Magistratus cum ea disceptatione sed religiosissimi Episcopi finem imponunto If it be an Ecclesiastical Suit let the Civil Magistrates have nothing to do there with that plea but let the Bishops end it Whereby it appears that prohibitions from the Temporal Courts were not then allowable which certainly came not into use till after
and a notorious offence of I. Pym to affirm as he did in his Speech in Parliament 4. Caroli That the high Commission was derived from the Parliament An impudent ignorant and seditious speech which if it had been spoken in the time of Henry the eighth when he recovered his Supremacy from the Pope the King would quickly have hanged or burnt him as he did many in his Reign upon that point of his Supremacy For though Parliaments may submit and acknowledge the Kings Supremacy yet they are not the Donors or Authors of it it is originally vested in the Crown and is a principal Flower thereof that cannot be denyed ot taken away from the King by any of their Votings or Ordinances And the King may again restore the Court of High Commission without the help of a Parliament and appoint such Judges and Commissioners as he shall think fit without direction or assistance from the House of Commons as the King doth appoint Judges in all other Courts without their consent and so may doe still in this Court Which is absolutely necessary to be done to suppresse the abominable and detestable increase of Sectaries and Schismaticks that are now risen up in this Inter-Regnum of the Kings Authority CHAP. IX The Example of the late warrs in Bohemia Germany France might well have forewarned us in England The Godly Covenant of Bohemia might well have given us Caution to take heed of a Covenant without the Kings consent The Church Lands taken away formerly are restored by the Emperour Grotius his Censure of the Presbyterians for raising Wars TO return again to our former matter of the separation of the Courts it is to be considered that the Courts being now divided in the Kingdome many hundred years since the ancient manner of their union is forgotten and unknown save only to the Learned and the scars of the Norman Conquest are so overgrown that few men are sensible what reliques of Slavery do still remain upon us by changing the order of the Courts the Language of the Law in great part with other things that I will not now mention But being so setled by the Conquerour and continued by his Successors the Temporal Courts in process of time grew too powerful for the Ecclesiastical and by their injunctions and prohibitions stopt many proceedings especially after the Councel of Clarendon under Hen. 2. Wherein the power of the Clergy was much abated and all Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction so crushed that it continued lame ever after Though the Clergy by appeals to Rome and the Popes Legats that were often sent hither did oftentimes help themselves and much molest their Adversaries At length under Hen. 8. upon his breach with the Pope the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction was much abridged and restrained in many particulars and reduced to a narrow compass becoming much more subject and obnoxious to the Injunctions Orders and prohibitions of all the Temporal Courts that now I mervail that any should complain and envy at their power and greatness there being no cause of any value or moment but by one order or other is drawn from them to the Temporal Courts And now at last there want not some that would have all Ecclesiastical authority and jurisdiction either wholly suppressed from the first Court to the last or at least so abated mingled or changed that what form or force of Government shall be left remaining seems very uncertain But if Presbyteries and such like Consistories of the forraign and new fangled devising were erected there will follow great confusion and disorder to the infinite disturbance of peace and quietnesse in the Kingdome by alteration of so many laws and customes and of the Common Law it self whereby the Kingdome hath been governed so many years and setled in peace and all mens estates and Lands held in certain possession For such great and universal changes as will follow upon the dissolution of the Hierarchy and taking away the Votes of Bishops in Parliament and other eminent parts of Government will produce such ill events and troublesome distractions as will not be pacified and composed within the compass of any mans life now living And what further mischeif may follow is uncertain but surely great troubles are like to ensue as indeed it hath happened in a most lamentable manner But if our Nation could have taken warning by the example of the late wars that happened these last 40. years in France Germany and Bohemia they might have prevented much evil for there the Wars began by men of the same spirit and humours as our Presbyterians are among us and had the same ends and purposes as ours had which is to take away the Honours Lands and Revenues of Bishops and all that belonged to them The ill sâ—ccesse of their names might well have forewarned us if there had been men among us wise and knowing of the Histories of the present age When we saw the Flame and Smoke of â—he Bohemian War ascend to heaven in our sight in most hideous manner And in the end all the zealous party were utterly undone and confounded that began the war against the Emperor to take away the lands of all the Clergy Bishops Deans and Chapters c. Which they account to be the flesh of the Whore of Babylon and the bones of the old Whore that is of the Pope So Brightman and Pareus and other zealous men do interpret the Text Revel 17. 16. All the Lands of the Church and Revenues among which they reckon Tythes are the flesh of the Pope which they must eâ—â—e and devour not Physice but Mystice saith Pareus in his Commentary For otherwise to eat the flesh of the Pope naturally being commonly an old man and perhaps full of Diseases would be no good meat or pleasing Diet But mystically to eat him that is to take away the lands revenues and riches of the Church will bring in profit and money that will provide better diet to feed upon then the body and flesh of an old Pope This Sacrilegious appetite and outragious covetousness to get the lands of the Church and Bishops proved very tragical to Bohemia and most parts of Germany And to shew a little their manner of proceeding I will digresse a little because it is so remarkable and fresh a Case within these last 40. years First therefore the Bohemians in the year 1619. assembled a Parliament without the Emperors Consent They raised a great army and put Garrisons also in all the best Towns and Castles They made a Godly Covenant consisting of an 100 articles just the same in Substance with our late Scottish Covenant they raised great Taxes and excise to maintain their armies and garrisons For two years they prevailed much and brought in a new King the Palsgrave but at the end of two years the Emperors great armies came upon them and fought the great Battle of Prague 8. Novemb. 1620. The Duke of Bavaria came with twelve thousand men and other great
and Combustions of France when the Protestants did call and hold Parliaments there without the Kings consent as at Loudun and Rochel 1627. and did garrison the City very strongly against the King Moulin doth take occasion to speak thereof in his Anatome Missae pag. 246. Where he reckoneth up the wars of Bohemia and what was done against Hierom of Prague and Iohn Husse and the fortunate battels fought by Zisca in the end he concludeth and inferreth this Haec non ideo à nobis allata sunt quod probemus actiones Ziscae aut tumultus populorum qui ut persecutiones martyrium effugiant arma sumunt adversus dominos suos etenim veritas Evangelica non his stabilitur rationibus modis Christus ad crucem pâ—st se ferendam nos voeat Sanguis martyrum plus habet efficaciae virtutis ad ampliandam Ecclesiam quam bellorum â—ertamâ—â—a Thus it appears that 〈◊〉 doth not justify the taking up of arms against Princes to reform Religion He was sensible of the Errors and losses of the Presbyterians in France in the wars they undertook against their King Lewis 13. Who in the end suppressed them took their strong towns and reduced them to obedience though he granted them the exercise of their Religion and how much they lost by the wars Moulin then liying in France and seeing both the beginning and end of the war could not be ignorant But the principal reason why the Presbyterians do maintain these desperate opinions of taking up arms is that they may pull down the Bishops and seise upon their revenues and lands as they have done notoriously of late both in Bohemia Germany and France and now with uâ— but they were inforced to regorge and restore them as appears fully in the late Histories which might have forewarned our Puritans Si mens non laeva fuisset The Emperor hath restored not onely in his patrimonial Countries all the Lands and Estates of the Bishops and Clergy which the puritans there had seised on of late years but those also which were taken away an 100 years ago as in the Duke of Wittenbergs Country whereof there are two volumes published at Tubing in Germany 1639. The Learned French Divine Chamier Tom. 2. lib. 15. c. 8. at large disputeth the question An tolerari debeat a Christianis Rex infidelis aut haereticus Pontificii dicunt non licet Christianis tolerare Regem infidelem aut haereticum si conetur pertrahere subditos ad suam haeresin vel infidelitatem c. Haec vero fax est seditionum scaturigo parricidiorum lerna malorum quibus hisce multis annis Anglia tentata est sed tentata tantum Deo protegente regiaque capita praesentibus periculis eripieute At nostrae Galliae Theatrum jam ter misere cruentatum duorum proxime Regum sanguine sic enim ratiocinati sunt parricidae aut qui parricidis sicas tradiderunt Non esse tolerandum Christianis regem incommodum Ecclesiae itaque deponendum Quid si non possit judicio solenni tamen ipso facto qui dignum se exhibuerit depositione censerl depositum ac proinde non amplius Regem sed Tyrannum ideoque jure occidi id est tolli quacunque possit ratione Quos furores si nulla alia revinceret ratio certe tam immania sceler aabunde debent hominum animos abominatione replesse Viderint homines Deut certe non dormit If Chamier had lived to see the murther of King Charles he would have said more then he did Hisce multis Annis Anglia tentata est sed tentata tantum God did preserve Q. Elizabeth oftentimes and King Iames from the Gunpowder Treason Upon both which occasions much hath been written by learned wise and excellent men both at home and abroad Against that wicked doctrine of raising arms against Kings to reform Religion Whereof not only the Papists are guilty but the Puritans As Bancroft proveth fully against Knoxe and Buchanan Goodman Gilly Cartwright and many others lib. 2. c. 1 2 3 4 of his dangerous positions The Puritans in England could be content to second King Iames writing against the Pope and Papists for deposing and murthering of Kings But for their own parts they account Parliaments to be superiour to all Kings and therefore maintain that Doctrine of Calvin that the tres ordines Regni the three estates of Parliaments may correct and punish Kings Which Doctrine David Pareus defended But his books were burned for it at London and both Universities But of late not only the three estates of the Kingdome but the third estate the Commons the representative of the peopledome may correct and punish Kings For they have styled themselves The Supream authority of the Nation without the House of Lords whom they voted to be uselesse and cast them out and make Statutes which they call Acts of Parliament without the House of Lords or the Royal assent Contrary to all the statutes recorded in the Book of Statutes Bancroft in the very end of his Book of dangerous positions doth plainly foretell that the Puritans would never give over their Clamour for Reformation till they had utterly ruined the whole Kingdome and Church as now it appears manifestly they have effected their desires in great part But saith Bancroft there are divers-men that will needs hood-wink themselves and stop their Ears with the Serpent in the Psalm of purpose because they would gladly have these things smothered up He meaneth men in great place that were willing to think that the Puritans were no such dangerous men as he and others did take them to be only scrupulous and peevish perhaps about Ceremonies and therefore were willing to forbear them and not to censure them sharply But Bancroft doth wisely tell them that if any such mischeifs which God forbid shall happen hereafter they were sufficiently warned that both should and might in good time have prevented them and withall it would then be found true which Livy saith Urgentibus Republicam fatis Dei hominum falutares admonitiones spernuntur When the Lord for the sins of the people is purposed to punish any Country he blindeth the eyes of the wise so as they shall either neglect or not perceive those ordinary means for the safety thereof which very simple men or babes in a manner did easily foresee Which Judgement I pray God turn far away and long from this and all other true Christian Lands and Kingdoms The principal end and project of the Presbyterians was not only to reform some things amisse but to pluck up both root and branch of Episcopacy and all Ecclesiastical laws and Courts though never so ancient and Fundamental setled by Magna Charta and many other Fundamental statutes as Circumspecte agatis 13. Edw 1. Articuli Cleri 9. Ed. 2. as Lord Coke doth expound them at large 2. Institut and for payment of Tythes and all Duties belonging to the Church there is both Common Law and
Statute Law as Lord Coke sheweth fully 2. Instit. pag. 693. upon the Statute of 18. Edw. 3. and 2 Edw. 6. and if the Presbyterians would not loose and foregoe Tythes they must maintain and uphold those statutes for better Laws for the true payment of Tythes and all Duties cannot be made But the Presbyterians account all humane laws but trash of humane Iuvention They will reform all according to the word of God in all points Their position is We must do nothing not so much as take up a rush or a straw without warrant from the Word of God As Cartwright affirmed and Hooker confuteth him accurately lib. 2. lib. 3. 8. 2. 3. c. He sheweth that in Scripture there is not a particular form of Church Government contained So the learned Francis Mason in his Sermon upon 1. Cor. 14. 40. Also the Learned Dr. Sanderson in the Preface to his 14. Sermons and in his 4. Sermon ad Clerum upon Rom 14. besides many others But though Hooker hath written with singular Wisdome Learning Godlinesse and Moderation yet the Puritans will not read him as Dr. Sanderson complaineth of them But what Bancroft did foresee and foretel so fully is now come to pass in our times to the great ruin and desolation of the Church King Iames in the conference at Hampton Court did something to pacifie the Puritans But in the conclusion he passed them over only with admonitions to be quiet and accepted their promise to be obedient for the time to come not to oppose the Bishops nor the Ecclesiastical Laws but to behave themselves as dutiful Subjects And the King with the Lords of his Council appointed Bancroft to write unto all the Bishops to deal moderately wiâ—h the Puritans which Letter is extant in print as full of moderation and gentle cautions as possibly could be expected But that mild proceeding of Bancroft and the Bishops and forbearing to bring them to obedience and submission by Ecclesiastical censures and other courses which might have been taken to put a final end to their wrangling humours gave the Puritans hope to find the like favour always in succeeding times as they did under Arch-bishop Abbot which Levity and forbearance occasioned the present troubles of these times in great part But the Puritans are an implacable generation who did only forbear till they had a further opportunity to promote their designs Which now they have in great part effected and verified the praediction of Bancroft and Hooker Who did foresee plainly their restless disposition and endlesse contentions not caring to set fire on the whole Kingdome as they have done these last 40. years in Germany Bohemia and France upon the same grounds and principles as our Puritans have done among us Being indeed secretly displeased because the Puritans were not preferred to the best offices and dignities in Church and Common-wealth which now they have invaded by open force and violence in most outragious manner especially the Puritan Ministers without any regard to the Laws of God or man thrusting themselves into the best preferments by way of Sequestration and then getting Acts and Orders to be continued in for their lives without any respect to the Title of the lawful patrons whose rights they set aside and suspend as well as the Incumbents most unjustly Whereas they are neither by desert for Learning nor education in the Universities capable of the best preferments they being only such as have been only poor Lecturers poor Vicars poor Schoolmasters and poor new lights such as are not qualified as the Statute requires to enjoy the best Livings of Value 13. Elizab. cap. 12. CHAP. X. The Division of the Courts in the Empire and the manner of proceeding in them by the Bishops and Ecclesiastical Lawyers under them NOw because what I have formerly said touching the uniting of the Ecclesiastical and Iemporal Courts may seem strange to many I desire not to be mistaken as if I perswaded any innovation or change of setled Laws and Courts of Justice Which would be a thing of dangerous consequence that no wise man would advise but leave all to the wisdome of Superiours to whom it properly belongeth Only I will add a few lines touching the ancient form and manner of Government in the Empire after that the Emperors became Christians from whom it is likely the example was taken both among us and in other Kingdomes Touching the division of the Courts Temporal from the Spiritual though William the Conquerour began the Separation with us in England yet there was the like done long before even by Constantine the great and first Christian Emperor who first gave leave to the Christian Bishops to meet in Councels and to make Canons to govern the Church Canones ut generalium Conciliorum ut Isidorus ait l. 6. Elym c. 16. a temporibus Constantini coeperant in praecedentibus namque annis persecutione fervente docendarum plebium minime dabatur facultas Inde Christianitas in diversas haereses scissa est quia non erat licentia Eiscopis in unam conveniendi nisi tempore supradicto Imperatoris Although ever since the Apostles held their first Council in Ierusalem Act. 15. where they made certain Canons for the pacification of the Church of Antioch there were also some provincial Councels held by the Bishops as the violence of persecutions would permit and suffer them to assemble and the necessity of the times did require as may be seen in the first Tome of the Councels before the great Nicene Councel was assembled by Constantine who being the first Christian Emperor did greatly labour to settle and advance the dignity of Episcopal government And because he knew well that superiority in the Church without power and jurisdiction was to little purpose Therefore the good Emperor in his Christian Zeal Enacted Etsi Praecipuum Pontificis sen Episcopi munus est doctrina verbi populum moderari tamen quia non omnes dicto audientes sunt nec ejusmodi persuasione ad disciplinam perduci vel in efficio retineri possunt superioritas in qua sunt Ecclesiastici atsâ—abdue imperio jurisdictione non satis habet nervorum authoritatis denique quoniam Ecclesia mater â—ultrix est Iustitiae Ideo Epâ—scopis peculiaris quaedam jurisdictio Ecclesiastica Civili dignior in personas causas legibus Imper est attributa c. Ut jus dicant Clericis c. And lest the Emperor in his Constitution in these words Ut jus dicant Clericis should seem to keep short and restrain the Bishops in their Audience or Consistories to Clergy men onely there follows a praeterea in the same title in the Code De Episcop audient Not long after this praeterea saith the Emperor there juâ— dicant laicis And as before the age of Constantine for want of power in the Church and the assistance of a Christian magistrate the Bishops could not restrain nor suppresse the many haeresies and schismes that did
which is all I shall say of the duty of ministers in point of divinity Now I come to the second duty of men in holy orders in point of conveniency or policy and am clearly of opinion that even in this regard and reflexion they ought not to be debarred from modestly intermedling in secular affairs For if there be any such inconveniency it must needs arise from this that to exercise some secular jurisdiction must be evil in it self or evil to a person in holy orders Which is neither so nor so For the whole office of a subordinate civil Magistrate is most exactly described in Rom. 13. 3 4. and no man can add or detract from the same The civil power is a divine ordinance set up to be a Terror to the evil and an incouragement to good works This is the whole compass of the civil power And therefore I do here demand with that most learned Bishop Davenant that within a few dayes did sit by my side in the eleventh Question of his Determinations What is there of impiety what of unlawfulnesse what unbecoming either the holynesse or calling of a priest in terrifying the bad or comforting the good Subject in repressing of sin and punishing of sinners For this is the whole and intire Act of civil jurisdiction It is in its own nature repugnant to no person to no function to no sort or condition of men let them hold themselves never so holy never so seraphical it becomes them very well to repress sin and punish sinners that is to say to exercise in a moderate manner civil jurisdiction if the Soveraign shall require it And you shall find that this doctrine of debarring persons in holy orders from secular imployments is no doctrine of the Reformed but the Popish Church and first brought into this Kingdome by the Popes of Rome and Lambiths Lanfranc Anselme Stephen Langton and the test together with Otho and Othobon and to this only end that the man of Rome might withdraw all the Clergy of this Kingdome from their obligations to the King and Nobility who were most of them great Princes in those times and thereby might establish and create as in a great part he did regnum in regno a Kingdome of Shaâ—elings in the midst of this Kingdome of England And hence came those Canons of mighty consequence able to shoot up a priest at one shot into heaven as that he must not meddle with matters of blood that he must not exercise civil jurisdiction not be a Steward to a Noble man in his house and all the rest of this Palea and Garbage That is in plain English the Priest must no longer receive obligations from either King or Lords but wholly depend upon his holy Fathers the Pope of Rome and the Pope of Lambeth or at least wise pay him soundly for their Dis ensations and Absolutions when they presume to do the contrary In the mean time here is not one word or shew of Reason to inform an understanding man that persons in holy orders ought not to terrifie the bad and comfort the good to repress sin and chastise sinners which is the summa totalis of the civil Magistracy and consequently so fat forth at the least to intermeddle with secular affairs And this is all that I shall say touching the motive and ground of this Bill and that persons in holy orders ought not to be inhibited from intermedling in secular affairs either in point of divinity or in point of conveniency and policy The second point consists of the persons reflected upon in this Bill which are Archbishops Bishops Parsons Vicars and all others in holy orders of which point I shall say little only finding these names hudled up in an heap made me conceive at first that it might have some relation to Mr. Bagshawes reading in the middle Temple which I ever esteemed to have been very inoffensively delivered by that learned Gentleman and with little discretion questioned by a great Ecclesiastick then in place For all that he said was this That when the Temporal Lords are more in voices then the Spiritual they may passe a Bill without consent of the Bishops which is an assertion so clear in reason and so often practised upon the Records and Rolls of Parliament that no man any way vers'd in either of these can make any doubt of it nor do I Though I humbly conceive no President will be ever found that the Prelates were ever excluded otherwise then by their own folly fear or headinesse For the point of being Justices of peace the Gentleman confesseth he never medled with Arch-bishops nor Bishops nor with any Clergy man made a Justice by his Majesties Commission In the Statute made 34. Ed. 3. c. 1. He finds assignees for the keeping of the Peace one Lord and with him 3. or 4. of the most valiant men of the County the troublesome times did then so require it and if God do not bless us with the riddance of these two armies the like provision will be now as necessary He finds these men included but doth not find Church-men excluded no not in the Statute 13. Rich. 2. cap. 7. that requires Justices of peace to be made of Knights Esquires and Gentlemen of the Law of the most sufficient of each County In which words the Gentleman thinks Clerks were not included and I clearly say by his favour they are not excluded Nor do the learned Sages of the Law conceive them to be excluded by that Statute If the King shall command the Lord Keeper to fill up the Commissions of each County with the most sufficient Knights Esquires and Gentlemen of the Law shall the Lord Keeper thereupon exclude the Noble-men and the Prelates I have often in my dayes received this Command but never heard of this interpretation before this time So that I cannot conceive from what ground this general sweep-stake of Arch-bishops Bishops Parsons Vicars and all others in holy orders should proceed I have heard since the beginning of my sicknesse that it hath been alledged in this House that the Clergy in the sixth of Edw. the third did disavow that the custody of the peace did belong to them at all and I beleive that such a thing is to be found amongst the Notes of the priviledges of this House But first you must remember that it was in a great storm and when the waters were much troubled and the wild people unapt to be kept in orders by Miters and Crosiersstaves But yet if that noble Lord shall be pleased to cast his eye upon the Roll it self he shall find that this poor excuse did not serve the Prelates turns Fot they were compelled with a witnesse to defend their parts of the preservation of the peace of the Kingdome as well as the Noble men and Gentry And you shall find the ordinance to this effect set down upon that Roll. I conclude therefore with that Noble Lords favour that the sweeping
of all the Clergy out of Temporal offices is a motion of the first impression and was never heard of in the English Common-wealth before this Bill I come in the third place to the main part of this cause the things to be severed from all men in holy orders which are as I told you of three kinds First matters of Freehold as the Bishops votes in parliament and Legislative power Secondly matters of favour as to be a Judge in Star-chamber to be a privy Counsellour to be a Justice of peace or a Commissioner in any Temporal affairs Thirdly and mixt matters of Freehold and Favour too as the Charters of some Bishops and many of the ancient Cathedrals of this Kingdome who allow them a Justice or two within themselves or their Close as they call it and exempt those grave and learned men from the rudenesse and insolency of Tapsters Brewers Inn-keepers Tailours and Shoomakers which do integrate and make up the bodies of our Country Cities and Incorporations And now is the Axe laid to the very root of the Ecclesiastical tree and without your Lordships justice and favour all the branches are to be lopt off quite with those later clauses and the Stock and root it self to be quite grâ—bb'd and digged up by that first point of abolishing all Vote and Legislative power in all Clergy men leaving them to be no longer any part of the people of Rome but meer Slaves and Bondmen to all intents and purposes And the priests of England one degree inferiour to the priests of Ieroboam being to be accounted worse then the Tayle of the people Now I hope no English man will doubt but this Vote and Representation in Parliament is not only a freehold but the greatest freehold that any Subject in England or in all the Christian world can brag of at this day that we live under a King and are to be governed by his Laws that is not by his arbitrary Edicts or Rescripts but by such Laws confirmed by him and assented to by us either in our proper persons or in our Assignees and Representations This is the very Soul and Genius of Magna Charta and without this one spirit that great Statute is little lesse then Littera occidens a dead and uselesse peice of paper You heard it most truly opened unto you by a wise and judicious Peer of this House that legem patere quam ipse tuleris was a Motto wherein Alexander Severus had not more interest then every true born English man No forty shillings man in England but doth in person or Representation enjoy his freedome and liberty The prelates of this Kingdome as a Looking-glass and Representation of the Clergy have been in possession hereof these thousand years and upwards The princes of the Norman race for their own ends and to strengthen themselves with men and money erected the Bishopricks soon after the Conquest into Baronies and left them to sit in that House with their double capacities about them the later invented for the profit of the prince not excluding the former remaining always from the beginning for the profit and concernment of the poor Clergy Which appears not only by the Saxon Laws set forth by Mr. Lambard and Sir Henry Spelman but also by the Bishops Writs and Summons to parliament in use to this very day We have many preceedents upon the Rolls that in Vacancy of Episcopal Seas the Guardian of the Spirituals though but a simple priest hath been called to sit in this Honourable House by reason of that former Representation and such an officer I was my self over that Sea whereof I am Bishop some 25 years agoe and might then have been summoned by Writ unto this Honourable House at that very time by reason of the Spiritualty of that Diocesse which then as a simple priest I did by virtue of the aforesaid office represent And therefore most noble Lords look upon the Ark of God representative that in this time floates in great danger in this deluge of waters If there be any Cham or unclean Creature therein out with him and let every man bear his own Burthen but save the Ark for God and Christ Jesus his sake who hath built it in this Kingdome for saving of people and your Lordships are too wise to conceive that the Word and Sacraments the means of our Salvation will be ever effectually received from those ministers whose persons shall be so vilified and dejected as to be made no parcels or fragments of this Commonwealth No saith Gregory the last trick the Devil had in this world was this that whâ—â— he could not bring the word and Sacraments into disgrace by errors and Heretical opinions he invented this project and much applanded his wit therein by casting slight and contempt upon the preachers and ministers And my Noble Lords you are too wise to beleive what the Common people talk that we have a vote in the election of Knights and Burgesses and consequently some Figure and Representation in the Noble House of Commons They of the Ministry have no vote in these elections they have no Representation in that Honourable House and these contrary assertions are so slight and groundlesse as I will not offer to give them any answer And therefore right Honourable Lords have a special care of the Church of England your Mother in this point and as God hath made you the most noble of all the peers of the Christian World so do not you give way that our Nobility shall be taught henceforth as the Romans were in the time of the first and second Punick wars by their Slaves and Bond-men only and that the Church of God in this Island may come to be served by the most ignoble Ministers that ever have been seen in the Christian Church since the passion of our Saviour And so much for the first thing which this Bill intends to sever from persons in holy orders viz. votes representations in parliament The next thing to be severed from them by this Bill is of a much baser mettal and alloy sittings in Star Chamber sittings at Councel-Table sitting in Commissions of the peace and other Commissions of secular affairs which are such favours and graces of Christian princes as the Church may have a being and subsistence without them The Fortunes of our Greece do not depend upon these Spangles and the Soveraign prince hath imparted and withdrawn these kind of favours without the envy or regret of any wise Ecclesiastical persons But my Noble Lords this is the Case Our King hath by the Statute restored unto him the Head-ship of the Church of England and by the Word of God he is Custos utriusque Tabulae And will your Lordships allow this Ecclesiastical Head no Ecclesiastical Sences at all No Ecclesiastical person to be consulted withal not in any Circumstances of time and place If Cranmâ—r had been thus dealt withal in the minority of our young Iosias King Edward the sixth
born mininster to intermeddle with secular affairs and therefore it is likewise lawful for the mean born so to do And so in my Conscience I speak it in the presence of God and great noble men it is most lawful for them to intermeddle with secular affairs so as they be not intangled as the Apostle calls it with this intermedling as to slight and neglect the office of their calling which no minister noble or ignoble can do without grievously sinning against God and his own Conscience It is lawful for persons in holy orders to intermeddle it is without question or else they could not make provision of meat and drink as Beza interprets the place It is not lawful for them to be thus intangled and bound up with secular affairs which I humbly beseech your Lordships to consider not as a distinction invented by me but clearly expressed by the Apostle himself And thus my noble Lords I shall without any further molestation and with humble thanks for this great patience leave this great Cause of the Church to your Lordships wise and gracious consideration Here is my Mars-Hill and further I shall never appeal for justice Some assurance I have from the late solemn vote and protestation of both Houses for the maintaining and defending the power and priviledges of Parliament that if this Bill were now to be framed in the one House it would never be offered without much qualification as I perswade my self it will not be approved in the other Parliaments are indeed omnipotent but no more omnipotent then God himself who for all that cannot do every thing God cannot but perform his promise A Parliament under favour cannot unswear what it hath already vowed This is an old Maxime which I have learned of the Sages of the Law a parliament cannot be felo de se It cannot destroy or undo it self An Act of parliament as that in the 11. and another in the 21 Rich. 2. made to be unrepealable in any subsequent parliament was ipso facto void in the constitution why Because it took away the power and priviledges that is not the plumes and feathers the remote accidents but the very specifical forme essence and being of a parliament So if an Act should be made to take away the Votes of all the Commons or of all the Lords it were absolutely a void Act. I will conclude with the first Epistle to the Corinthians Cap 12. Vers. 15. If the Foot shall say because I am not the hand I am not of the Body is it therfore not of the body Vers. 20. But now are they many Members yet but one Body Vers. 2â— And the Eye cannot say unto the Hand I have no need of thee nor again the Head unto the Feet I have no need of you Some Annotations upon the Arch-Bishops SPEECH WHereas the Arch-bishop saith Sect. 3. That the Bishops sate in parliaments and all publick Assemblies of State a thousand years it is certainly true as appears fully by the Subscriptions of their names to all constitutions Laws and Ordinances made in the several great Councels of the Kingdome in the times of the Saxon Kings the manner being then to give their assent not by verbal voting but by subscribing their names as fully appears in Sir Henry Spelmans Edition of the Councells at the end of all such Assemblies and Councells as were then held And whereas the Arch-bishop saith that the princes of the Norman race erected the Bishopricks into Baronies it is very true as Cambden sheweth in his Britannia pag. 170. And so the great Abbots also heretofore by right and custome were peers of the Kingdome and did sit in parliaments to order decree and determine But the Conquerour ordained both Bishops and Abbots to be under military Service erecting every Bishop and Abbey at his Will and pleasure and appointing how many Soldiers he would require of them to be furnished for him and his Successors in times of Hostility and War So that the Tenure and Title of Barons being imposed on them it was no addition of honour to them they being superiour to Thanes or Barons though as Cambdon saith out of Mathew Paris That which was then complained of by the Cleagy and accounted as a burden in the age ensuing was accounted as the greatest honour And so it hath continued as a Title of Honour â—o the Bishops Whereas the Archbishop saith That the Word and Sacraments the means of our Salvation will not be effectually received from those Ministers whose persons shall be so vilified and dejected as to be made no parcels or fragments of the Common-wealth This doth certainly prove too true Religion it self is vilified and the Word of God and his Sacraments neglected almost in every parish because the persons that should perform the duties and offices are become contemptible for want of that Honour and Respect which they enjoyed legally heretofore Therefore God anciently in the Kingdome of Israel did greatly honour the Tribe of Levi when he made the priests Levites the principal officers Judges in every Court to whom the people were to be obedient upon pain of Death Deut. 17. 12. The Administration of law and Justice throughout the Kingdome depended oâ— them principally For God made his Covenant with Levi of Life and Peace The Law of Truth was in his Mouth The Priests Lips should preserve knowledge and they should seek the Law at his Mouth Mal. 2. 5 6 7. and so Ezekiel 44. 23. They shall teach my people the difference between the holy and prophane and cause them to discern between the unclean and the clean and in Controversie they shall stand in iudgement and they shall iudge according to my Iudgement and they shall keep my Laws and my Statntes in all my Assemblies They beiâ—g the principal Judges and Lawyers in that Common-wealth of Gods own Constitution And whereas it is now granted on all hands that there was three Courts of Justice in that Kingdome 1. The great Councel of 70 Elders 2. The Court of Judgement consisting of 23. 3. The Court of some three or some few more The Priests and Levites were principal men both Judges and Officers in all Courts both Scophtim Schoterim as 1. Chron. 19. 8 11. both to give Sentence and Judgement and also to execute the same So the Divines do affirm also in their late Annotations upon 1 Chron. 26 29 30. 2. Chron. 19. 8 11. They did study the Judicial and â—olitick Laws and had power to see the Law of God and injunctions of the King to be observed and to order divine and humane affairs And they held also other Honourable offices for we read that Zechariah a Levite was a wise Councellour and Benajah a priest son of Iehojadah was one of Davids twelve Captains being the third Captain of the Host for the third moneth and in his course consisting of 2400 was his son Amizabad Benajah was also one of David's principal worthies
having the name among the three mighties He was also Captain of the Guard to David and after the Death of Ioab he was made Lord General of the Host by King Solomon in Ioabs room 1. King 2. 35. And this is fully to be proved by excellent learned men As Sigonius Bertram Casaubon Moulin especially by the learned Hugo Grotius upon Mal. 5. 21. Where he doth accurately shew out of the Text Iosephus Philo and other Monuments of the Jews that there was no distinction of Courts the one Ecclesiastical the other Civil as Calvin and Beza and some others that follow them would have it but the Judges and Courts were united and the Priests and Levites the principal Judges and Officers in every Court to whom the people were to be obedient upon pain of Death Deut. 17. 12. They being appointed to hear every cause between blood and blood between plea and plea and between Stroke and Stroke being matters of Controversie within thy Gates And as our Laws call them Pleas of the Crown and Common pleas or whatsoever else did arise among them pertaining to God and the King 1 Chron 26. 30. 32. for which purpose God did scatter them in every Tribe and turned the curse of Iacob into a singular blessing to be divided in Iacob and scattered in Israel Appointing 1700 to be on the West-side Iordan and 2700 on the East-side The ancient frame of our Kingdome for 500. years beforre the Conquest was thus disposed and governed As Spelman sheweth fully in his learned Glossary and Councels and happy had it been if things had continued so still But now the Law being otherwise setled and the Courts divided it is not safe or easie to make alteration Only without change of Law or Courts the Benches may continue as they are though some more Judges be added in most Courts and some Eclesiastical persons among them as in the Saxon times Comes praesidebat foro Comitatus non solus sed adjunctus Episcopo hic ut jus divinum ille ut hnmanum diceret alterque alteri anxilio esset Consilio Praesertim Episcopus Comiti nam in hunc illi annimadvertere saepe licuit errantem cohibere Idem igitur utrique territorium jurisdictionis terminus Glossarium in Comes pag. 111. The Bishop and Earl of the County were joint Magistrates in every Shire and did assist each other in all Causes and Courts and so Mr. Selden in his History cap. 14. Sect. 1. By this means there was great union and harmony between all judges and officers whereas now there is great contention for jurisdiction and intollerable clashing in all Courts by Injunctions prohibitions Consultations and crosse orders to the great Vexation of the Clients and Subjects And by multiplying several Courts the number of Lawyers is greatly increased as Lord Cook sheweth 4. Instit. p. 76. Where he gives divers reasons of the increase of Suits in Law and in the same Book reckoneth up no lesse then 74. Courts of Law and justice of all sorts in the Kingdome besides the Ecclesiastical Courts Which are not many for the number and had little businesse to do when they were in greatest power For commonly two or three proctors were enough to dispatch the businesse of any Bishops Court without Advocates But in the Courts of Common Law there is a farâ— greater number of Lawyers in these times whereas there was but an 140. Lawyers and Attorneys appointed by that Martial and Legislative King Edw. 2. When he distinguished the Courts and appointed the number of Lawyers and Attorneys for the whole Kingdome whereof the Writ is referred unto by Lord Cook 4. Instit. pag. 76. But the writ it self is put down by Spelman in his Glossary pag. 44. 58. Sed hodie forte in uno Comitatu tot solummodo Atlornati reperiantur But the Division and Separation of the Ecclesiastical Courts from the Temporal seems to have proceeded first from Pope Nicholas the first as is mentioned in Gratian. Com. Cum ad verum 96. Distinct. about two hundred years before the Conquest which was imitated among us by William the Conquerour whose Statute for that purpose is recited and illustrated by Spelman in his Glossary and lately also published by Mr. Selden and Lord Cook 4. Instit. c. 52. So that as the Pope hath been the Authour of much evill in the World oftentimes so in this particular when he came to the height of his greatnesse having de facto the Supremacy in all Ecclesiastical matters he made the Clergy subject only to himself and his Deputies and Legates and such officers as he sent among us But at length Hen. 8. Contested with the Pope and recovered the Supremacy of his Crown though it cost much blood and opposition in his time But he having recovered it and it being approved by Parliament it is fully setled upon the King and vested in his Crown And as Lord Cook saith 4. Instit. pag. 331. His Majesty hath and Queen Elizabeth before him had as great and ample Supremacy and Iurisdiction Ecclesiastical as ever King of England had before them and that had justly and rightly pertained to them by divers other Acts and by the ancient Laws of England if the Clause of annexation in the said Statute of 1 Eliz. had never been inserted Wherefore the Speech of Iohn Pym as in Rushworths Collections 4. Caroli That the Supremacy was given by parliament to the Crown and as he seemeth to understand it may be taken away by parliament is a dangerous opinion not to be endured Lord Cook saith 4. Instit. pag. 325. The Act 1. Eliz is an Act of Restitution not a gift meerly given which was not formerly due and belonging to the jurisdiction of the Crown If therefore the King hath his Supremacy vested in his Crown so firmly and is Custos ntriusque Tabulae by the Word of God as the Arch-bishop sheweth Then this Ecclesiastical Head must be allowed to have some Ecclesiastical Sences to be consulted withal excellently learned and principal persons of the Clergy And as he addeth truly If Cranmer the Arch-bishop had been thus dealt withal and suppressed in the minority of our young Iosias Ed. 6. What had become of the great work of our Reformation and also if Ridley Latimer Hooper and the rest of the protestant Bishops Martyrs afterwards had been set aside and neglected the Reformation could not have been effected Therefore unlesse the King have good choice of Ecclesiastical persons excellently Learned Bishops both in the ancient Councels Fathers Histories and Controversies and in Canon and Civil Laws requisite to determine of great difficulties that will continually happen in the Church whereof the Conusance belongeth to the Spiritualty as Lord Cook sheweth out of the Statute 25. H. 8. cap. 21. and commendeth them for their Knowledge Integrity and Sufficiency and if so then much more at this day I saith Coke When all kind of Learning is eminently advanced to an higher
as Lord Coke saith it may be done without the help of a Parliament as the King appointeth Judges and great Officers in all the Courts in Westminster-hall without consent of Parliaments The Learned Lord Herbert in his History of Hen. 8. relating some passages of the Kings Reformation of some abuses affirmeth that the first fatal blow the English Church received was when the Redress of her was referred to the House of Commons Complaint was made for probate of testaments and mortuaries of pluralities non-residence and priests that were farmers of Lands c. But the King lost or let go for the present a principal point of his Supremacy whereby he might have reformed what was fit to be done in these and many the like businesses without referring to the House of Commons and we find that they never left off reforming till they have utterly deformed all and wholly suppressed all Ecclesiastical Law Courts and Jurisdictions The King by his Supremacy might have reformed and prescribed Laws for probate of Wills non-residence pluralities and many more such matters the Concurrence of the Metropolitan had been sufficient to regulate such matters according to the Laws Ecclesiastical for there are Laws Ecclesiastical in this Kingdome as well as Temporal and as ancient and fundamental as any part of the Common Law and therefore fit to be duly kept and observed Linwood doth gloss upon the Constitutions made by the Archbishops of Canterbury which are accepted for good Laws by the Common Lawyers in Ecclesiastical matters and so there are also Constitutions for the province of York and the Northern parts all which are allowed for good Laws Ecclesiastical by those that are truely learned in the Laws Two SPEECHES spoken in the House of Lords by the Lord Viscount Newarke The first concerning the right of BISHOPS to sit and vote in Parliament May 21. 1641. MY LORDS I Shall take the boldness to speak a word or two upon this subject first as it is in it self then as it is in the consequence For the former I think he is a great stranger in Antiquity that is not well acquainted with that of their sitting here they have done thus and in this manner almost since the conquest and by the same power and the same right as the other Peers did and your Lordships now do and to be put from this their due so much their due by so many hundred years strengthened and confirmed and that without any offence nay pretence of any seems to me to be very severe if it be jus I dare boldly say it is summum That this hinders their Ecclesiasticall vocation an argument I hear much of hath in my apprehension more of shadow then substance in itâ— if this be a reason sure I am it might have been one six hundred years ago A Bishop my Lords is not so circumscribed within the circumference of his Diocesse that his sometimes absence can be termed no not in the most strict sense a neglect or hindrance of his duty no more then that of a Leiutenant from his County they both have their subordinate Ministers upon which their influences fall though the distance be remote Besides my Lords the lesser must yield to the greater good to make wholsome and good Laws for the happy and well regulating of Church and Common-wealth is certainly more advantagious to both then the want of the personal execution of their office and that but once in three years and then peradventure but a moneth or two can be prejudicial to either I will go no further to prove this which so long experience hath done so fully so demonstratively And now my Lords by your Lordships good leave I shall speak to the consequence as it reflects both on your Lordships and my Lords the Bishops Dangers and inconveniences are ever best prevented elonginquâ— this precedent come near to your Lordships and such a one that mutato nomine de vobis Pretences are never wanting nay sometimes the greatest evils appear in the most fair and specious outsides witness the Shipmony the most abominable the most illegal thing that ever was and yet this was painted over with colour of the Law what Bench is secure if to alleage be to convince and which of your Lordships can say then he shall continue a member of this House when at one blow twenty six are cut off It then behoves the Neighbour to look about him cum proximus ardet Ucalegon And for the Bishops my Lords in what condition will you leave them The House of Commons represents the meanest person so did the Master his Slave but they have none to do so much for them and what justice can tie them to the observation of those laws to whose constitution they give no consent the wisdome of former times gave proxies unto this House meerly upon this ground that every one might have a hand in the making of that which he had an obligation to obey This House could not represent therefore proxies in room of persons were most justly allowed And now my Lords before I conclude I beseech your Lordships to cast your eyes upon the Church which I know is most dear and tender to your Lordships you will see her suffer in her most principal members and deprived of that honour which here and throughout all the Christian world ever since Christianity she constantly hath enjoyed for what Nation or Kingdome is there in whose great and publick Assemblies and that from her beginning she had not some of hers if I may not say as essential I am sure I may say as integral parts thereof And truly my Lords Christianity cannot alone boast of this or challenge it onely as hers even Heathenisme claims an equal share I never read of any of them Civil or Baâ—barous that gave not thus much to their Religion so that it seems to me to have no other original to flow from no other spring than Nature her self But I have done and will trouble your Lordships no longer how it may stand with the honour and justice of this House to pass this Bill I most humbly submit unto your Lordships the most proper and only Judges of them both The Second SPEECH about the Lawfulness and Conveniency of their intermedling in Temporal Affairs MY LORDS I Shall not speak to the preamble of the Bill that Bishops and Clergy men ought not to intermeddle in temporal Affairs For truly My Lords I cannot bring it under any respect to be spoken of Ought is a word of Relation and must either refer to humane or divine Law To prove the lawfulnesse of their intermedling by the former would be to no more purpose then to labour to convince that by reason which is evident to sense It is by all acknowledged The unlawfulnesse by the latter the Bill by no means admits of for it excepts Universities and such persons as shall have honour descend upon them And your Lordships know that circumstance and chance alter not the