Selected quad for the lemma: kingdom_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
kingdom_n	edward_n	king_n	william_n	1,778	5	7.8362	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A91263	A seasonable, legall, and historicall vindication and chronologicall collection of the good, old, fundamentall, liberties, franchises, rights, laws of all English freemen (their best inheritance, birthright, security, against arbitrary, tyrannicall, and Egyptian burdens) and of their strenuous defence in all former ages; of late years most dangerously undermined, and almost totally subverted, under the specious disguise of their defence and future establishment, upon a sure basis, their pretended, greatest propugners. Wherein is irrefragably evinced by Parliamentary records, proofs, presidents, that we have such fundamentall liberties, ... that to attempt or effect the subversion of all or any of them, ... is high treason: ... / By William Prynne of Swainswick, Esquire.; Seasonable, legall, and historicall vindication and chronologicall collection of the good, old, fundamentall, liberties, franchises, rights, laws of all English freemen. Part 1	Prynne, William, 1600-1669.	1654 (1654)	Wing P4062; Thomason E812_10; ESTC R207634	45,225	63

* Aave not other Pioners and Jasses done the like Pioners have not onely undermined these Banks but they have levelled them even with the ground It one that was known to be Hostis Patriae had done this though the Dammage be the same yet the Guilt is lesse but the Con●ervatores Riparum the overseers intrusted with the Defence of these Banks for them to destroy them the breach of Trust aggravates nay alters the nature of the offence Breach of Trust though in a private Person and in the least things is odious amongst all men much more in a publick Person in things of great and publick concernment because * This is now grown a meere Paradox GREAT TRUST BINDS THE PARTY TRUSTED TO GREATEST CARE AND FIDELITY It is TREASON in the Constable of Dover Castle to deliver the Keys to the known enemies of the Kingdom because the Castle is the Key of the Kingdome wheras if the housekeeper of a private person deliver possession to his Adversary it is a crime scarce punishab●e by Law The * What are they now of late times of publick Changes Judges under his Majesty are the Persons trusted with the Laws and in them with the Lives Liberties and Estates of the whole Kingdom This Trust of all we have is primarily from his Majesty * See 27 H. 8. c. 24. 26. Magna Charta c. 12. 29 32 H. 3. c. 1. 3 5. 9 20 3 E. 1 c. 44. 45 46. 13 E. 1. 10 12 30 31. 35 39. 44. 45. 25 E 1. c. 1 2. 27 E. 1. c. 2 3. 34 E. 1. c. 6. 12 E. 2. c. 6. 2 E. 3. c. 3. 14 E. 3. c. 10. 16. Rastal Justices in him delegated to the Judges His Majesty at his Coronation is bound by his Oath TO EXECUTE JUSTICE TO HIS PEOPLE ACCORDING TO THE LAWS thereby to assure the people of the faithfull performance of his Great Trust His Majesty again as he trusts the Judges with the performance of this part of his Oath so doth he likewise exact another Oath of them for their due execution of Justice to the people according to the Laws hereby the Judges stand intrusted with this part of his Majesties Oath If therefore the Judges shall do wittingly against the Law they do not onely break their own Oaths and therein the Common Faith and Trust of the whole Kingdome but do as much as in them lies sp●rce and blemish the sacred Person of his Majesty with the odious and hatefull sin of * Was it ever so freque ●t a sia as now in all sorts of late Judges Officers Subjects Perjury My Lords the hainousnesse of this offence is most legible in the * Do none deserve as severe now severe punishment which former ages have inflicted upon those Judges who have broken any part of their Oaths wittingly though in things not so dangerous to the Subject as in the case in question * See Cooks 3. Instil p. 146 147 and f. 133 Hollirshed p. 284 285. Speeds History p. 651. S●ow Walsingham Daniel in 18 Ed. 1. Sir Thomas Wayland Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas 17 E. 1. was attainted of Felony for taking bribes and his Lands and Goods forfeited as appears in the Pleas of Parliament 18 E. 1. and he was banished the Kingdome as unworthy to live in the State against which he had so much offended * See Cgoks 3. Instit. p. 145. Sir William Thorp Chief Justice of the Kings Bench in Edward the thirds time having of five persons received five severall Bribes which in all amounted to one hundred pounds was for this alone adjudged to be hanged and all his Goods and Lands forfeited The reason of the Judgement is entered in the Roll in these words Quia praedictus Wilielmus * Have none of this Name or of his Function since done the like in an higher degree Thorp qui Sa cramentum Domini Regis erga populum suum habuit ad custodiendum fugit malitiosè falsò rebelliter quantum in ipso fuit There is a notable Declaration in that Judgement that this Judgement was not to be drawn into example against any other officers who should break their Oaths but onely against those qui praedictum Sacramentum fecerunt fregerunt * Let Custodes Legum Lib●rtatum Angliae remember it habent Leges Angliae ad custodiendum That is onely to the Judges Oaths who have the Laws intrusted unto them This Judgement was given 24 E. 3. The next year in Parliament 25 E. 3. Num. 10. it was debated in Parliament whether this Judgement was legall Et nullo contradicente it was declared TO BE JUST AND ACCORDING TO THE LAW and that the * Let the Repater and others consider it same Judgement may be given in time to come upon the like occasion This case is in point That it is death for any Judge wittingly to break his ●ath in any part of it This oath of Thorp is entred in the Roll and is the same verbatim with the Judges Oath in 18 E. 3. and is the same which the Judges now take And let those who have taken the same Oath remember and apply this President left others do it for them Your Lordships will give me leave to observe the differences between that and the case in question 1. That of Thorp was onely a selling of the Law by Retail to those five persons for he had five severall bribes of these five persons the Passage of the Law to the rest of the Subjects for ought appears was free and open But these Opinions are a conveyance of the Law by wholesale and that not to but from the Subject 2. In that of Thorp as to those five persons it was not an absolute deniall of Justice it was not a damming up but a straitning onely of the Chanel For whereas the Judges ought Judicium reddere that is the Laws being THE BIRTHRIGHT and INHERITANCE OF THE SVBJECT the Judge when the parties in suit demand Judgement should re dare freely restore the Right unto them now he doth not dare but vendere with hazard onely of perverting Justice for the party that buyes the Judgement may have a good and honest cause But these Opinions besides that they have cost the Subjects very dear dearer than any nay I think I may truly say than all the unjust Judgements that ever have been given in this Realm witnesse the many hundred thousand pounds which under colour of them have been levyed upon the Subjects amounting to * This is nothing in comparison to the late Taxes or Excises imposed on the Subjects without a Parliament amounting to above 20 times as much as the Kings Shipmony and more frequent uncessant and endlesse than it seven hundred thousand pounds and upwards that have been paid unto the Treasurer of the Nav● in sundry years besides what the Subjects have been forced to pay Sheriffes Sheriffes-Bayliffes and now an hundred

at Aiciston Hill in Oxfordshire where they intended their first meeting b See the Journals of both Houses and Act for his Attainder Mr. Pyms Declaration upon the whole matter of the Charge of High Treason against him April the 12. 1641. M. St. Iohns Argument at Law at his Attainder and Diurnal Occurrences 9. To come nearer to our present times and case In the last Parliament of King Charls Anno 1640. 1641. The whole house of Commons impeached Thomas Earl of Strafford Lord Deputy of Ireland of High Treason amongst other Articles for this crime especially wherein all the other centred That he hath TREASONABLY ENDEVOURED by his Words Actions and Counsels to SUBVERT THE FUNDAMENTALL LAWS OF ENGLAND and IRELAND and introduce an Arbitrary and Tyrannicall Government This the whole Parliament declared and adjudged to be High Treason in and by their votes and a speciall Act of Parliament for his Attainder for which he was condemned and soon after executed on Tower Hill as a Traytour to the King and Kingdome May 22. 1641. c See the Commons and Lords Iournals his printed impeachment Mr. Pyms Speech thereat Canbuties Doom p. 25 26 2● 38 40 10. The whole House of Commons the same Parliament impeached William Laud Archbishop of Canterbury of HIGH TREASON in these very terms February 6. 1640. First That he hath trayterously endeavoured to subvert Fundamentall Lawes and Government of this Kingdome of England and instead thereof to introduce An Arbitrary and Tyrannicall Government against Law See chap. 2. Proposition 1. and he to that end hath wickedly and TRAYTEROUSLY advised his Majesty that he might at his own will and pleasure L●vy and take money of his Subjects without their consent in Parliament and and this he affirmed was warrantable by the Law of God Secondly He hath for the better accomplishment of that his Trayterous design advised and procured Sermons and other Discourses to be preached printed and published in which the Authority of Parliaments and the force of the Lawes of this Kingdome have been denyed and absolute and unlimited Power over the persons and estates of his Majesties Subjects maintained and defended not onely in the King but in himself and other Bishops against the Law Thirdly He hath by Letters Messages Threats and promises and by divers other wayes to Judges and other Ministers of Justice interrupted perverted and at other times by means aforesaid hath endevoured to interrupt and pervert the course of Justice in his Majesties Courts at Westminster and other Courts TO THE SUBVERSION OF THE LAWS OF THIS KINGDOME whereby sundry of his Majesties Subjects have been stopt in their just suits deprived of their lawfull Rights and subjected to his Tyrannical will to their ruine and destruction Fourthly That he hath trayterously endevoured to corrupt the other Courts of Justice by a vising and procuring his Majesty to sell places of Judicature and other offices CONTRARY TO THE LAWS and CUSTOMES in that behalf Fifthly He hath TRAYTEROUSLY caused a Book of Canons to be compiled and published without any lawfull warrant and Authority in that behalf in which pretended Canons many matters are contained contrary to the Kings Prerogative to the fundamentall Laws and Statutes of this Realm to the Rights of Parliament to the Property and Liberty of the Subject and matters tending to sedition and of dangerous consequence and to the establishing of a vast unlawfull presumptuous power in himself and his Successors c. Seventhly That he hath trayterously endevored to alter and subvert Gods true Religion BY LAW ESTABLISHED and instead thereof to set up Popish Religion and Idolatry And to that end hath declared and maintained in Speeches and Printed Books divers Popish Doctrines and opinions contrary to to the Articles of Religion ESTABLISHED BY LAW He hath urged and enjoyned divers Popish and Superstitious Ceremonies WITHOVT ANY WARRANT OF LAW and hath cruelly persecuted those who have opposed the same by corporall punishments and imprisonments and most unjustly vexed others who refused to conform thereunto by Eccclesiasticall Censures Excommunication Suspension Deprivation and Degradation CONTRARY TO THE LAWS OF THIS KINGDOME 13. He did by his own authority and power contrary to Law procure sundry of his Majesties Subjects and enforced the Clergy of this Kingdome to contribute towards the maintenance of the war against the Scots That to preserve himself from being questioned for these and other his Trayterous Courses he hath laboured to Subvert the Rights of Parliament and the ancient Course of Parliamentary Proceedings and by false and malicious slanders to incense his Majesty against Parliaments All which being proved against him at his Triall were after solemn Argum●nt by Mr. Samuel Brown in behalf of the Commons House proved and soon after adjudged to be High Treason at the Common Law by both Houses of Parliament and so declared in the Ordinance for his Attainder for which he was condemned and beheaded as a Traitor against the King Law and Kingdome on Tower hill January 10. 1644. 11. In the a See the Commons and Lords Journals Durnal Occurrences p. 15 16 19. 37. 191. to 264. and Mr. St. Iohns Speech at a conscience of both Houses of Parliament concerning shi●mony and these Judges Together with the Speeches of Mr. Hide Mr. Walker Mr. P●erpoint Mr. Denzill Hollis at their impeachments ●uly 16. 1641. aggravating their offences in Diurnall Occurrences and Speeches same Parliament December 21. Jan. 14. February 11. 1640. and July 6. 1641. Sir John Finch then Lord Keeper chief Justice Bramston Judge Berkly Judge Crawly Chief Baron Davenport Baron Weston and Baron Turnour were accused and impeached by the House of Commons by several Articles transmitted to the Lords OF HIGH TREASON for that they had Traitorously and wickedly endeavoured to subvert the Fundamentall Laws and est●blished Government of the Realm of ENGLAND and instead thereof to introduce an Arbitrary and Tyrannicall Government against Law which they had declared by Traiterous and wicked words opinions judgement and more especially in this their extrajudiciall opinion subscribed by them in the case of Ship-money viz. We are of opinion that when the good and safety of the Kingdome in generall is concerned and the whole kingdome in danger Your Majesty may by Writ under the Great Seal of England without consent in Parliament command all your Subjects of this your Kingdome See ch 2. Proposition 1. at their charge to provide and furnish such a number of Ships with Men Victuall and Ammunition and for such time as your Majesty shall think fit for the Defence and safeguard of the Kingdome from such danger and perill And we are of opinion that in such case your Majesty is the sole Judge both of the danger and when and how the same is to be prevented and avoided And likewise for arguing and giving iudgment accordingly in Master John Hempdens case in the Exchequer Chamber in the point of Ship money in Aprill 1638. which said Opinions

times more to T●oopers and Souldiers who forcibly levy their unlawfull Contributions and Excises and otherwise which altogether as is conceived amounts not to lesse than a million in five years space whereas now we pay above two Millions in Taxes Imposts Excises every year besides the infinite v●xations of the Subject by suits in Law binding them over attendance at the Councel Table taking them from their necessary imployments in making Sesses and Collections and imprisonment of their persons all now trebled to what then I say besides what is past to make our miseries compleat they have as much as in them is MADE THEM ENDLESSE as others since have done for by these Opinions they have put upon themselves and their Successors An impossibility of ever doing us right again an incapacity upon us of demanding it so long as they continue as the Compilers of the late Instrument with 42. Strings intitu●ed The Government of the Common-wealth of England c. Artic. 1 2 3 9 10 12 22 24 25 26 27 28. 31 32. 36 37 38 39. have done as far as they and much beyond them In that sore famine in the Land of Egypt when the inhabitants were reduced to the next doore to death for there they say why should we die for bread First they give their money next their flocks and Cattle last of all their persons and Lands for bread all became Pharaohs but by this Lex Regia there is a transaction made not onely of our persons but of our bread likewise wherewith our persons should be sustained that was for bread this of our bread For since these Opinions if we have any thing at all we are not at all beholding TO THE LAW FOR IT but are wholly cast UPON THE MERCY and GOODNESSE OF THE KING Again there the Egyptians themselves sold themselves and all they had to the King if ours had been so done if it had been so done by our own free consent in Parliament we had the lesse cause to complain But it was done against our wills and by those who were trusted and that upon Oath with the preservation of these things for us The Laws are our Forts and Bulwarks of Defence If the Captain of a Castle onely out of fear and Cowardice and not from any Compliance with the enemy surrender it This is TREAON as was adjudged in Parliament 1 R. 2. in the two Cases of Comines and Weston and in the Case of the Lord Gray for surrendering Barwick Castle to the Scots in Edward the thirds time though good defence had been made by him and that he had lost his eldest son in maintenance of the Siege and yet the losse of a Castle loseth not the Kingdome onely the place and adjacent parts with trouble to the whole But by the Opinions there is a Surrender made of all our Legal defence of Property that which hath been preacht is now judged that there is no Meum Tuum between the King and people besides that which concerns our Persons The Law is the Temple the Sanctuary whether Subjects ought to run for shelter and Refuge hereby it is become Templum fine numine as was the Temple built by the Romane Emperour who after he had built it put no gods into it We have the Letter of the Law still but not the sense we have the Fabrick of the Temple still but the Dii Tutelares are gone But this is not all the Case that is That the Law now ceaseth to aid and defend us in our Rights for then possession alone were a good Title if there were no Law to take it away Occupanti concederetur melior esset Possidentis conditio But this though too bad is not the worst for besides that which is Privitive in these Opinions there is somewhat positive For now the Law doth not onely not defend us but the Law it self by temporising Judges and Lawyers is made the Instrument of taking all away For whensoever his Majesty or his Successors shall be pleased to say that the good and safety of the Kingdome is concerned and that the whole Kingdome is in danger the when and how the same is to be prevented makes our persons and all we have liable to bare will and Pleasure By this means The Sanctuary is turned into a Shambles the Forts are sleighted that so they might neither do us good nor hurt But they are held against us by those who ought to have held them for us and the mouth of our own Can●n is turned upon our own selves and that by our own military Officers Souldiers and others since as well as the Ship money Judges then ' Thus far Mr. Oliver St. John by the Commons Order whose words I thought fit thus to transcribe at large because not onely most pertinent but seasonable for the present times wherein as in a Looking Glasse some pretended Judges and Grandees of these present and late past times may behold their own faces and deformities and the whole Nation their sad condition under them In the residue of that his Printed Speech he compares the Treason of the Shipmony Judges and of Sir Robert Tresylium and his Complices in XI R. 2. condemned and executed for Traytors by Judgement in Parliament for endevouring to subvert the lawes and statutes of the Realm by their illegall Opinions then delivered to King Richard at Nottingham Castle not out of conspiracy but for fear of death and corporall Torments wherewith they were menaced whose offence he there makes transcendent to theirs then in six particulars as those who please may there read at leisure being over large to transcribe I could here inform you that the Fundamentall laws of our Nation are the same in the Body politique of the Realm as the Arteries Nerves Veins are in and to the naturall Body the Bark to the tree the Foundation to the House and therefore the cutting of them asunder or their Subversion must of necessity kill destroy disjoyn and ruine the whole Realm at once therefore it must be Treason in the highest degree But I shall onely subjoyn here some materiall Passages in his Argument at Law concerning the Attainder of high Treason of Thomas Earl of Strafford before a Committee of both Houses of Parliament in Westminster Hall April 29. 1641. soon after printed and published by Order of the Commons House wherein p. 8. he layes down this Position recited again p. 64. That Straffords Endeavouring To subvert the Fundamentall Laws and Government of England and Ireland and instead thereof to introduce a Tyrannicall Government against Law is Treason by the Common-Law That Treasons at the Common-Law are not taken away by the Statutes by 25. E. 3. 1. H. 4. c. 10. 1. Mar. c. 1. nor any of them The Authorities Judgements in and out of Parliament which he cites to prove it have been already mentioned with some others he omitted I shall therefore but transcribe his Reasons to evince it to be Treason super-added to those

have done some other of my writings of this nature with all which they must first brand Mr. St John Mr. Pym the whole House of Commons the last two with all other Parliamens forecited ere they can accuse traduce or censure me who do but barely relate apply their words and judgements without malice or partiality for the whole Kingdomes benefit and security To these punctuall full Jury of Records and Parliamentary Authorities in point I could accumulate Sir Edward Cook his 3. Institutes p. 9. printed and authorised by the House of Commons speciall Order the last Parliament The severall Speeches of Mr. Hide Mr. Walker Mr. Pierpoint and Mr. Hollis July 6. 1641. at the Lords Bar in Parliament by order of the Commons House at the Impeachment of the Shipmony Judges of High Treason printed in Diurnall Occurrences and speeches in Parliament London 1641. p. 237. to 264. Mr. Samuel Browns Argument at Law before the Lords and Commons at Canterburies Attainder all manifesting their endevouring to subvert the Fundamentall Laws and government of the Nation to be HIGH TREASON with sundry other printed Authorities to prove That we have fundamentall Laws Liberties Rights and a fundamentall Government likewise which ought not to be innovated violated or subverted upon any pretences whatsoever by any power or prevailing Faction But to avoid prolixity the double Jury of irrefragable and punctuall Authorities already produced being sufficient to satisfie the most obstinate Opposites formerly contradicting it I shall onely adde three swaying Authorities more wherewith I shall conclude this point The first is a very late one in a Treatise intituled A true State of the Common wealth of England Scotland and Ireland and the Dominions thereunto belonging in Reference to the late established Government by a Lord Protector and a PARLIAMENT It being the Judgement of DIVERS PERSONS who throughout these late troubles have approved themselves faithfull to the Cause and interest of God and their COUNTRY presented to the Publick for the satisfaction of others Printed at London 1654. who relating the miscarriages of the last Assembly at Westminster use these expressions of them p 13 14 16 17 21 22. But on the contrary it so fell out in a short time that there appeared many in this Assembly of very contrary Principles to the interest aforesaid which led them violently on to attempt and promote many things the consequence whereof would have been A Subverting of the fundamentall Laws of the Land the Destruction of Property and an utter extinguishment of the Gospel In truth their Principles led them TO A PULLING DOWN ALL AND ESTABLISHING NOTHING So that instead of the expected settlement they were running ●ut into FURTHER ANARCHY and CONFUSION As to the Laws and Civil Rights of the Nation nothing would serve them but A TOTALL ERADICATION OF THE OLD and INTRODUCTION OF A NEW and so the Good Old Laws of England the Guardians of our Lives and Fortunes established with prudence and confirmed by the experience of many Ages and Generations The Preservation whereof was a principall Ground of our late Quarrel with the King having been once abolished what could we have expected afterward but an inthroning of Arbitrary Power in the Seat of Judicature and an exposing of our Lives our Estates our Liberties and all that is dear unto us as a Sacrifice to the boundlesse Appetite of Meer Will and Power c. Things being at this Passe and the House through these proceedings perfectly disjointed it was in vain to look for a settlement of this Nation from them thus constituted on the contrary nothing else could be expected But that the Common-wealth should sink under their Hands and the great cause hitherto so happily upheld and maintained to be for ever lost through their preposterous management of these affairs wherewith they had been intrusted Whereupon they justifie their dissolution and turning them forcibly out of doores by the Souldiers with shame and infamy to prevent that destruction which thereby was coming on THE WHOLE LAND but this New Powder Treason Plot set on foot by the Jesuites and Anabaptists to destroy our Laws Liberties properties Ministers and Religion it self at one blow and that in the very Parliament House where they had been constantly defended vindicated preserved established in all former ages by all true English Parliaments The second is a See my Speech in Parliament p. 100. to 108. The Votes of the House of Commons concerning a Paper presented to them entituled An agreement of the people for a firm and present peace upon grounds of Common Right 9. November 1647. viz. Resolved upon the Question That the matters contained in these Papers Are destructive to the being of Parliaments and to the Fundamentall Government of this Kingdome Resolved c. That a Letter be sent to the Generall and those Papers inclosed together with the Vote of this House upon them And that he be desired to examine the proceedings of this businesse in the Army where it was first coined and return an Accompt hereof to this House These Votes were seconded soon after with these ensuing votes entred in the Commons Journall and printed by their special Order 23. November 1647. A Petition directed to the Supream Authority of England the Commons in Parliament assembled The humble petition of many Free born people of England c. was read the first and second time Resolved upon the Question that this petition is A sedititious and contemptuous avowing and prosecution of a former petition and paper annexed stiled an agreement of the people formerly adjudged by this House to be Destructive to the being of Parliaments and Fundamentall Government of the Kingdome Resolved c. That Thomas Prince Cheesemonger and Samuel Chidley be forthwith committed prisoners to the Prison of the Gatehouse there to remain prisoners during the pleasure of this House for a Seditious avowing and prosecution of a former Petition and Paper annexed stiled An Agreement of the People formerly Ajudged by this House to be destructive to the being of Parliamen's and fundamentall Government of the Kingdome Resolved c. That Jeremy Jues Thomas Taylor and William Larnar be forthwith committed to the Prison of Newgate there to remain Prisoners during the pleasure of this House for a seditious and contemptuous avowing and prosecution of a former Petition and Paper annexed stiled An Agrement of the people formerly adjudged by this House to be destructive to the being of Parliaments and Fundamentall Government of this Kingdome Resolved c. That a Letter be prepared and sent to the Generall taking notice of his proceeding in the execution according to the Rules of Warre of a mutinous person avowing and prosecuting this agreement in the Army contrary to these Votes at the Rendezvouz near Ware and to give him thanks for it and to desire him to prosecute that Businesse to the bottome and to bring Such guilty persons as he shall think fit to condigne and exemplary Punishment Resolved c.

and in new illegall Military or other Arbitrary Judicatories Committees or Courts of High Justice unknown to our Ancestors 3. That no Freeman of England unlesse it be by Speciall Grant and Act of Parliament may or ought to be compelled enforced pressed or arrayed to go forth of his own Countrey much lesse out of the Realm into forreign parts against his will in times of Warre or Peace or except he be specially obliged thereto by ancient Tenures and Charters save onely upon the sudden coming of strange enemies into the Realm and then he is to array himself onely in such sort as he is bound to do by the ancient Laws and Customes of the Kingdome still in force 4. That no Freeman of England may or ought to be disinherited disseised dispossessed or deprived of any inheritance Freehold Liberty Custome Franchise Chattle Goods whatsoever without his own Gift Grant or free Consent unlesse it be by lawfull Processe Triall and Judgement of his Peers or special Grant by act of Parliament 5. That the old received Government Lawes Statutes Customes Priviledges Courts of Justice legal Processe of the Kingdome and Crown ought not to be altered repealed suppressed nor any new form of Government Law Statute Ordinance Court of Judicature Writs or legal Proceedings instituted or imposed on all or any of the Free-men of England by any Person or Persons but onely in and by the Kingdomes free and full consent in a lawfull Parliament wherein the Legislative Power solely resides 6. That Parliaments ought to be duly summoned and held for the good and safety of the Kingdome every year or every three years at least or so often as there is just occasion That the Election of all Knights Citizens and Burgesses to sit and serve in Parliament and so of all oother Elective Officers ought to be free That all Members of Parliament hereditary or Elective ought to be present and there freely to speak and vote according to their judgements and Consciences without any over-awing Guards to terrifie them and none to be forced or secluded thence And that all Parliaments not thus duly summoned elected whilst held but unduly packed and all Acts of Parliament fraudulently and forcibly procured by indirect means ought to be nulled repealed as void and of dangerous president 7. That neither the Kings nor any Subjects of the Kingdome of England may or ought to be summoned before any Forreign Powers or Jurisdictions whatsoever out of the Realm or within the same for any manner of Right Inheritance Thing belonging to them or Offence done by them within the Realm 8. That all Subjects of the Realm are obliged by Allegiance and duty to defend their Lawfull Kings Persons Crowns the Laws Rights and Priviledges of the Realm and of Parliament against all Usurpers Traytors violence and Conspiracies And that no Subject of this Realm who according to his duty and Allegiance shall serve his King in his Warres for the just defence of him and the Land against Forreign enemies or Rebels shall lose or forfeit any thing for doing his true duty service and Allegiance to him therein but utterly discharged of all vexation trouble or losse 9. That no publick Warre by Land or Sea ought to be made or levied with or against any Forreign Nation or Publick Truce or League entred into with Forreign Realms or States to bind the Nation without their Common advice and consent in Parliament 10. That the ancient Honours Manors Lands Rents Revenues Inheritances Right and perquisites of the Crown of England originally settled thereon for the Ease Exemption of the people from all kind of Taxes payments whatsoever unlesse in cases of extraordinary necessity and for defraying all the constant ordinary expences of the Kingdome as the expences of the Kings houshold Court Officers Judges Embassadors Garisons Navy and the like ought not to be sold alienated given away or granted from it to the prejudice of the Crown and burdening of the people And that all Sales Alienations Gifts or Grants thereof to the empairing of the publick Revenue or prejudice of the Crown and people are void in Law and ought to be resumed and repealed by our Parliaments and Kings as they have frequently been in all former ages For the Readers fuller satisfaction in each of these propositions some of which I must shew here but briefly touch for brevity sake having elsewhere fully debated them in print I shall specially recommend unto him the perusall of such Tractates and Arguments formerly published wherein each of them hath been fully discussed which he may peruse at his best leasure The first of these Fundamentalls which I ●ntend principally to infist on is fully asserted debated confirmed by 13. H. 4. f. 14. By Fortescue Lord Chief Justice and Chancellour of England de laudibus Legum Angliae dedicated by him to King Henry the 6. f. 25. c. 36. f. 84. By a learned and necessary Argument against impositions in Parliament of 7. Jacobi by a late Reverend Judge printed at London 1641. By Mr. William Hakewell in his Liberty of the Subject against Impositions maintained in an Argument in the Parliament of 7. Jacobi printed at London 1641. By Judge Crooks and Judge Huttons Arguments concerning Shipmony both printed at London 1641. By the Case of Shipmony briefly discussed London 1640. by Mr. St. Johns Argument and Speech against Shipmony printed at London 1641. By Sir Edward Cook in his 1. Institutes p. 46. and 57. to 64. and 528. to 537. By the 1. and 2. Remonstrance of the Lords and Commons in Parliament against the Commission of Array Exact Collection p. 386. to 398. and 850. to 890. and by my own Humble Remonstrance against Shipmony London 1643. The fourth part of the Soveraign power of Parliaments and Kingdomes p. 14. to 26. and my Legall Vindications of the Liberties of England against Illegall Taxes c. London 1649. and by the Records and Statutes cited in the ensuing Chapter referring for the most part to the first Proposition The second third and fourth of them are largely debated and confirmed by a Conference desired by the Lords and had by a Committee of both Houses concerning the Rights and Priviledges of the Subject 3. Aprilis 4. Caroli printed at London 1642. By Sir Edward Cook in his Institutes on Magna Charta c. 29. p. 45. to 57. By the 1. and 2. Remonstrance of the Lords and Commons against the Commission of Array Exact Collection p. 386. c. 850. to 890. By Judge Crooks and Judge Huttons Arguments against Shipmony By Sir Robert Cotton his Posthuma p. 222. to 269. By my Breviate of the Prelates encroachments on the Kings Prerogative and Subjects Liberties p. 138. c. My new discovery of the Prelates tyranny p. 137. to 183. and some of the ensuing Statutes and Records The fifth and sixth of them are fully cleared and vindicated in and by the Prologues of all our Councils Statutes Laws before and since the Conquest By Sir Edward Cooks 4. Institutes ch 1. Mr. Cromptons Jurisdiction of Courts Title High Court of Parliament My Soveraign power of Parliaments and Kingdomes p. 1 2 3 4. My Legal Vindication against illegal Taxes and pretended Acts of Parliament London 1649 Prynne the Member reconciled to Prynne the Barrester printed the same year My Historicall Collection of the ancient great Councils of the Parliaments of England London 1649. My Truth triumphing over Falshood Antiquity over Novelty London 1645. and some of the Records hereafter transcribed In this I shall be more sparing because so fully confirmed in these and other Treatises The seventh is ratified by Sir Edward Cooks 1. Institutes p. 97 98. 4. Institutes p. 89. and 5. Report Cawdries Case of the Kings Ecclesiasticall Lawes and Rastals Abridgement of Statutes Tit. Provisors Praemunire and Rome 11. H. 7. c. 1. and other Records and Statutes in the ensuing Chapter The eighth and ninth are fully debated in my Soveraign Power of Parliaments and Kingdomes Part. 2. p. 3. to 34. Part fourth p. 162. to 170. and touched in Sir Robert Cottons Posthuma p. 174. 179. How all and every of these Fundamentall Liberties Rights Franchises Lawes have been unparalelledly violated subverted in all and every particular of late years beyond all Presidents in the worst of former ages even by their greatest pretended Propugners their own printed Edicts Instruments Ordinances Papers together with their illegall oppressions Taxes Excises Imposts Rapines violences Proceedings of all kinds whereof I shall give a brief accompt in its due place will sufficiently evidence if compared with the premised propositions Which abundantly confirm the truth of our Saviours words John 10. 1. 10. and this rule of Johannis Angelius Wenderhagen Politicae Synopticae lib. 3. c. 9. sect 11. p. 310. Hinc Regulae loco notandum Quod omne Regnum Vi Armata acquisitum in Effectu Subditis Semper in durioris Servitutis conditiones arripiat licet à principio Ducedinem prurientibus spirare videatur Ideo cunctis hoc cavendum Nè temerè se duci patiantur FINIS