would deduce its Origin not from the time of this solemn Edict or Commandment but from that time when God foretold the rebuilding of the Temple and City by the Prophet But the Jews make themselves most ridiculous in that to invalidate the Arguments of the Christians by which they prove from this Prophecy that the Messias is already come they pretend to put this fictitious Computation upon the World that the Weeks of Daniel ought to begin with the Destruction of the first and end with the Destruction of the second Temple so that the 70 years of their Captivity during which time the Temple remained desolate is to be added to 410 years which they say is the time the 2d Temple has stood as may be seen in their Chron. Major in Rabbi Isaac Abarbinel Rabbi Isaac Ben Abraham and others of the same Stamp This Opinion is contradictory to the express Words of the Angel That from the going forth of the Commandment to restore the City these 70 Weeks are to be computed Besides that it is l Cap. 9. v. 17. absolutely false that there is an Interval of 490 years betwixt the Destruction of the first and the second Temple For as has been sufficiently demonstrated before n the Destruction of the first Temple hapned in the Year of the Julian Period 4124 whereas the second Temple was laid in Ashes in the Year of the Julian Period 4783 so that the whole Interval amounts to no less than 659 years It is also quite beyond the Purpose when the Jews pretend to explain the Words of the Angel concerning the Messiah of King Cyrus For tho' we read in (o) C. 45. v. 1. Isaiah Thus said the Lord to his Anointed to Cyrus no Infetence is to be made from thence that the Word Messiah either by it self or with such Attributes as occur in this Passage of Daniel are ever applied in the Scripture to any Earthly Prince See D. Mulleri Judaism c. 10. and Constantini L'Empereur Annotat. ad Jachiâ—d § 5. We read of four several Edicts concerning Four several Edicts concerning the Rebuilding of the City occur in the Scripture the Restauration of the Jews and the Rebuilding of the Temple and City in the Holy Scripture The first we meet with is in (p) C. 1. v. 1. Ezra In the first Year of Cyrus King of Persia that the Word of the Lord by the Mouth of Jeremiah might be fulfilled the Lord stirred up the Spirit of Cyrus King of Persia that he made a Proclamation throughout all his Kingdom and put it also in Writing saying Thus said Cyrus King of Persia The Lord God of Heaven hath given me all the Kingdoms of the Earth and he hath charged me to build him an House at Jerusalem which is in Judah Who is there among you of all his People His God be with him and let him go up to Jerusalem which is in Judah and build the House of the Lord God of Israel he is the God which m Ch. 22. is in Jerusalem c. The same Words we read also in the (q) C. 6. â— â—2 2â— Chronicles pursuant to the Prophecy of (r) C. â—â— Isaiah The second Mandate or Edict concerning this Restitution is describ'd likewise by (s) C 6. v. â—â— 11. 12. Ezra which being sent by Darius in the same year that the Prophets Haggai and Zechariah began to prophesie to the Governours beyond the River contains the following Words Let the Work of this House of God alone Let the Governour of the Jews and the Elders of the Jews build this House of God in his Place c. Also I have made a Decree that whosoever shall alter this Word let Timber be pulled down from his House and being set up let him be hanged thereon and let his House be made a Dunghil for this And the God that hath caused his Name to dwel there destroy all Kings and People that shall put to their Hand to alter and to destroy this House of God which is at Jerusalem I Darius have made a Decree let it be done with speed And the Prophecies of Hâ—ggai and Zachariah cited by Ezra mention expresly the second Year of Darius and the Month. for thus we read in Haggai Chap. 1. v. 1. seq In the second Year of Darius the King in the sixth Month in the first Day of the Month â—â—me the Word of the Lord by Haggai the Prophet unto Zetubbabel the Son of Shealtiel Governour of Judah and to Joshua the Son of Josedech the High Priest saying thus saith the Lâ—rd of Hosts c. Go up to the Mountain and bring Wood and build the House and I will take Pleasure in it and I will be glorified said the Lord The same Mandate is repeated by (t) C. 1. v 1. Zâ—chariah in the eighth Month of the same second Year of Darius when pursuant to God's Commandment and the Decree of the Persian King the Work was happily brought to Perfection according to the Words of Ezra (u) C. â— v. 15 16. And this House was finished on the third Day of the Month Adar which was in the sixth year of the Reign of Darius the King And the Children of Israel the Priests and the Levites and the rest of the Children of the Captivity kept the Dedication of this House with Joy The third Edict is likewise described by (x) C. 7. v. â— sâ—qâ— Ezra This Ezra went up from Babylon and the King granted him all his Request according to the Hand of the Lord his God upon him And there went up some of the Children of Israel and of the Priests and the Levites and the Singers and the Porters and the Nethinims unto Jerusalem in the 7th year of Artaxerxes the King And he came to Jerusalem in the 5th Month which was in the 7th Year of the King This Decree of King Artaxerxes granâ—s full Liberty to the Jews to return to Jerusalem and exempts all the Priests Levites and other Ministers of the House of God from Toll Tribute or Custom The fourth Edict concerned particularly Nehemiah (y) Ezr. â— v. 13. 24. who in the 20th year of King Artaxerxes got leave to go to Jerusalem with the King's Letter to the Governours beyond the River and unto Asaph the Keeper of the King's Forests that he should give the Jews Timber to make Beams for the Gates â—f the Palace which appeâ—tâ—ineth to the House and for the Wall of the City and for the House he was to enter into as may be seen more at large in Nehemiah Chap. 2. from the 1st to the 9th Verse And these are the four several Mandates concerning the Restauration of the Jews and the Rebuilding of the Temple and City unto one of which the Beginning of these 70 Weeks mâ—st be fixed For the better understanding of the different Opinions of the Chronologers concerning the Time and Reigns of these Kings unto whom the said Mandates are ascribed we have
of Nabonnedus according to Berosus 3. From the first year of the Babylonian Epocha of Cyrus till the beginning of the Reign of Cambyses according to the Celestial Characters mentioned by Ptolemy are accounted 9 years 4. From the beginning of the Nabonassarean Epocha till the time of Cyrus are accounted by Ptolemy 209 years From these Characters it is concluded that the first year of the Babylonian Epocha of Cyrus mention'd in Prophane History was coincident with the 4176th year of the Julian Period Cycl ☉ 4. ☽ 15. If therefore 4175 years be added to any certain year To find out the year since the Beginning of this Epocha of the Babylonian Epocha of Cyrus according to the Calculation of the Prophane Historians the Product will shew the year of the Julian Period And if the said 4175 years be subtracted from the known year of the Julian Period the Residue will shew the year since the Beginning of this Epocha § 1. THere are some who don 't allow of any Whether the Babylonian and Persian Epocha of Cyrus be the same difference betwixt the Persian and Babylonian Epocha of Cyrus but maintain that in one and the same year he made himself Master of Persia Media Assyria and Babylon which being repugnant to all the best Monuments of Antiquity it is a Wonder to me how some among the Learned could be misguided into this Opinion § 2. There are some who affirm that Balthasar Whether Balthasar was the last King of Babylon was the last King of Babylon who was vanquished by Cyrus in Conjunction with Darius the King of the Medes being misguided by the Authority of (a) Lib. 10. c. 12. Ant. Josepus whose Words are as follows Abilamerodach died in the 18th year of his Reign and was succeeded by his Son Niglisar who reigned 40 years After his Death succeeded his Son Labosordach who dying about 9 Months after the Kingdom was devolved to Balthasar whom the Babylonians call Naboandel He was engaged in a bloody War against Cyrus King of Persia and Darius King of Media and whilst he was besieg'd in Babylon was surprised by a most prodigious Vision and not long after both Balthasar and the City fell into the Hands of Cyrus King of Persia who took Babylon in the 17th year of the Reign of Balthasar c. But Josephus is mistaken in this Relation as may appear out of the Fragments of the true Berosus inserted by (b) Lib. 1. contra App. Josephus himself For Labosordach mentioned by Josephus is the same with Balthasar Neither hapned the Conquest of Cyrus under his Reign Neither did Darius the Median conquer the Kingdom of Babylon But according to Berosus and Megasthenes was declared King of the Babylonian Empire § 3. It is also called in Question by some whether Darius the Median mentioned in the Scripture Whether Darius Medus is the same with Nabonnidus is the same with Nabonnidus mentioned by Herodotus and other Historians because that Nabonnidus is called by Berosus the Babylonian but Darius is surnamed in the Scripture the Median But since Darius is mentioned in the Scripture as the immediate Successour of Belsazar who in prophane History is called Labosoradach and that the other Historians have made Nabonnidus or Laponytus as Herodotus calls him it seems more than probable that these two Names belong to one and the same Person especially since Megasthenes says of the Babylonians They declared Nabonnichus a Foreigner their King § 4. Henricus Buntingus with some others Of the Opinion of Xenophon concerning Darius Medus relying upon the Authority of Xenophon would make this Darius Medus the same with Cyaxares mentioned in prophane History But concerning the Authority of Xenophon we have spoke sufficiently before § 5. There are also many learned Authors who being misled by Josephus would have this Darius Medus was not the Son of Astyages Darius to have been the Son and Successor of Astyages and Uncle to Cyrus But tho' Darius was originally of Media (c) Dâ—n 9. ver 1. yet he is not called King of Media but of Chaldaea And Justin sufficiently contradicts this Opinion when he says Astyages had no Male Issue § 6. According to Berosus whose Fragments are inserted by Josephus Cyrus after he had vanquished Of the Conquest of Babylon Darius besieged the City of Babylon which being well provided with Provisions sufficient to sustain a long Siege the Inhabitants bid Defiance to the Persians who at last having found means to drain the River of Euphrates which runs through the City by diverting its Course into the adjacent Marshes surprised the City Herodotus relates that the Persians the better to put their Design in Execution had pitch'd upon a Day which being one of the Festivals among the Babylonians they were bufied in Dancing and other Jollities The Prophet (d) Cap. 44 v. 27. Isaiah seems to have foretold this Derivation of the River of Euphrates when he says of Cyrus That saith to the Deep be dry and I will dry up thy Rivers as the Conquest of Babylon in the Absence of their King was foretold by (e) C. 51. v. 31. Jeremiah One Post shall run to meet another and one Messenger to meet another to shew the King of Babylon that his City is taken at one End and that the Passages are stopâ— and the Reeds they have burnt with Fire and the Men of War are affrighted c. § 7. There is also a Contest among the Chronologers Whether Cyrus conquered Babylon before Croesus whether Cyrus conquer'd the Babylonian Empire after he had vanquished Croesus or before Justin relates that Croesus assisted the Babylonians against Cyrus who after the Conquest of Babylon marched into Lydia against Croesus who was vanquished and taken Prisoner by him But Herodotus says expresly that Cyrus vanquished Croesus before the Conquest of Babylon and Eusebius (f) Chronic. and Julius Solinus Cap. 7. agree in Opinion that the Conquest of Lydia hapned in the first year of the 58th Olympiad (g) C. 25. v. 26. Jeremiah seems to favour the last when after he had mentioned all the other Kings before he says thus of the King of Babylon And the King of Sheshach shall drink after them § 8. Some of the Chronologers make the first Of the first year of Cores mentâ—on'd in the Scriptures year of the Babylonian Epocha of Cyrus coincident with the same year which is in the Scriptures called the First Year of Cores They alledge in their behalf that to reckon backwards from the fourth year of King Jehoiachim when according to the Opinion of some the Flower of the Jewish Nation was carried into Captivity by Nebuchadnezzar to the first year of the Babylonian Epocha of Cyrus compleats exactly the time of 70 years and that the Conquest of Babylon by Cyrus and his Deliverance of the Jews out of their Captivity is agreeable to the Prophecy of (h) C. 25. v. 12. Jeremiah
Julian year as a constant and acurate rule of their times whence it happens that they do not only refer to the Julian Calendar those things which came to pass after it's first Institution but by way of prolepsis make use of the same from the beginning of the World nay before the beginning it self and that for 3 Reasons 1st Because this sort of year is universally known and as equally fitted to the Egyptian and Nabonassarean as other years 2ly That after the Nabonassarean it is the most plain and easie of any 3dly Because the same Months in this year have the same changes of the Seasons fixed which and other like Reasons induced that famous Mathematician Kepler to lay aside the Gregorian and make use of the Julian in his Tables of Heavenly Bodies nay and Petavius tho' very much addicted to the Gregorian Stile cannot but give the Julian this Character viz the Julian year says he when fitted to use is the most agreeable to the Nature of things since that comes as near as can be to the course of the Sun and is no less fit to Register the times for which reason it is made use of in the Chronicles and Annals of most Writers and that not only in recording of things since its Institution but before nay from the beginning of the World it self Wherefore for example sake when they would assign the Eclipses of the Sun or Moon or the Wars of Cities and Kingdoms and their famous Actions in their years and seasons they always make use of the Julian Years and Months as if they were then used by them which by Anticipation and a sort of fiction they institute by which ours will more easily agree with them being fitted to the common times Nor will the Reader be tired in observing the different sorts of years For Petavius saith that it is the most exact Account of time and easiest to be made use of and which beyond all others is most fitted to common use and cometh nearer to the Revolution of the Sun than any other sort of year whatever and these and many other Reasons there are why the Julian year should in general be explain'd being likewise the Receptacle of all other Epocha's § 12. The Ancients did not add at the end Of the Bissextile of the year that whole day arising from the 4 times 6 hours but to February reckoning the 6 of the Calends of March twice over yet still accounting those two Days for one in which sense Celsus (c) De Verb. sig L. 2. takes it For says he it matters not whether it be on the former or the latter days since that those are but accounted one which Marcellinus notes was always thought by the Romans unfortunate § 13. Since a Julian year is taken to be 365 The difference between a Solar Tropical and a Julian year days 6 hours and the Solar Tropical mean years according to Longo-montanus to be 365d 5b 48′ 55″ it thence appears that the difference of quantity between them following the said Longomontanus's Hypothesis is but 11′ 5″ which Chronologers usually call the Civil Equinoctial Procession and that because in so much time the places of the Equinox do vary in the Julian year by which means in the space almost of 130 years the Equinoctial and Solstitial points seem to go backward a whole day § 14. As to the space of time of the great Of the great Canicular year Canicular year which is called the Stoick or Cynick period Censorinus gives us this account of it f The Moon says he belongs not to the Egyptian year which we call Canicular because it begins the first day of the Month they call the Thoth when the Dog-Star arises For their Civil d De Die Nat. c. 18. year has only 365 days without any intercalatory day therefore the space of 4 years with them is almost a day less than the Natural 4 years by which it happens that in the year 1461. it revolves to the same place This year is by some called Heliacal as belonging to the Moon and by others 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 § 15. As the Heathens were destitute of the Of Plato's great year light of Scripture and consequently of the Original of the World so they err strangely about its end The great year of Plato was a very notable fiction The Stoicks as well as the Platonicks thought that the World must have naturally an end when all the Stars were again revolved to the same point but what Period of years this Revolution may require is not as yet known even Kepler himself despairs of the Possibility of this invention when he asserts that the Motion of the Stars are incommensurable with themselves § 16. Lastly as to Aristotle's Greatest year some Of Aristotle's greatest year confound it with Plato's great year from which notwithstanding it differs which Censorinus further thus speaks of There is says he another year that Aristotle calls the greatest rather than the great which the Spheres of the Planets constitute when they come together to the same places where they were before the Winter of which made the Worlds Deluge and its Summer will make the last Conflagration c. but Marsilius makes mention of another real year in which the Soul of Man finishes its Circuit of Transmigration which time they say is perform'd in 12000 years to 3 of which years the great year of the World is equal consisting of 36000 years wherein the Anima Mundi performs its Course but Peter of Aliacus the Cardinal does otherwise determine the Quantity of the great year for says he as from the beginning of Aries to the end of Virgo is equal to the half of that space which is from the beginning of Libra to the end of Pisces so ought there to be from the Birth of Christ to the end of the World as much time as was from Adam or the Creation of the World to the coming of our Saviour this space was 5260 years therefore according to him from the beginning of the World to the end will be 10400 all the Stars finishing their Courses c. CHAP. VII Of the Epacts 1. Vnder the Name of Epacts we usually understand the Difference between a Lunar and Julian year 2. The Epacts are either Civil or Astronomical 3. The Civil Epacts are days intercepted between the common Julian year of 365 days and the Lunar taken at large of 354 days hence the Annual Epacts consist of 11 days except in every 19 year in which there are 12. 4. The Astronomical Epacts may be termed those Days Hours and Minutes which are intercepted between the common Lunar year and the mean or equal Julian year which are 10d 12h 11′ 22″ 16‴ § 1. THe word Epact is derived from the Greek The Etymology of the Epacts 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which besides other things signifies to intercalate In which sense Plutarch in Numa uses it and in the Egyptian
Et nova de gravido palmite gemma tumet c. After having said much more in Praise of the Spring the Poet makes this Answer Bruma novi prima est veterisque novissima Solis Principium capiunt Phoebus annus idem § 5. The Year which preceded the first Julian Of the Year of Confusions Year was called the Year of Confusion because it consisted by reason of the Neglect of the Intercalations of 15 Months or 445 Days as is evident from the Words of Censorinus Caesar says he when High-Pontiff of Rome in his third Consulship and in the first of Emil. Lepidus to correct what had been neglected before intercalated two Months consisting of 67 Days betwixt the Months of November and December having already added 23 Days to the Month of February and this made that Year to consist of 445 Days And (c) Vit. Caes Suetonius represents the Correction of Caesar in the same manner from all which it is evident that the Year of Confusiâ—â— began on the 14th day of October in the Year of the Julian Period 4667. § 6. Though Caesar had been very careful in appointing the exact time of Intercalation yet The Correction of the Julian Tears Caesar having been slain in the second year of this Epocha out of Ignorance of those who had the Management of the Calendar these Intercalations were made sooner than it ought to have been which induced Octavius Augustus to undertake the Reformation of these Julian Years which is thus related by Macrobius The Priests says he have given Occasion to a new Error by their Intercalations For whereas they ought to have intercalated that Day which is made up out of four times 6 Hours at the latter End of each 4th year at the Beginning of the 5th they did make this Intercalation at the Beginning of each 4th year This erroneous Intercalation was continued for 36 years together in which time 12 Days were intercalated instead of 9. This Mistake was likewise corrected by Augustus who ordered that the 12 next following years should not be intercalated that these three Days which by the Over-hastiness of the Priests were introduced might be swallowed up thus in this Interval Afterwards he ordered pursuant to Caesar 's Intention that at the Beginning of each 5th year one Day should be intercalated and that this should for an everlasting Remembrance be cut in Brass § 7. It is undeniable that there is some Mutation in the Ingress of the Sun into the Celestial Whether the Julian Years need another Correction Points and that likewise the Feasts of Easter have been misplaced in the Old Calendar Nevertheless I cannot see any sufficient Reason which should induce us to approve of the Gregorian Correction or any other but rather to retain the ancient Form of the Year as in the times of Julius Caesar and without cutting off a Day by reason of the Preceding Equinoxes to investigate the Plenilunium Paschale out of the most exact Astronomical Tables and to â—ix the Feast of Easter on the first Feria next ensuing the said Plenilunium thus following the Footsteps of both the Emperours Julius and Constantine For it is well known that the first regulated the Publick and Civil Records according to the Motion of the Sun in which he followed the Opinion of Sosigenes and his Solar Year We have before us the Examples of many great Mathematicians and of Ptolemy himself who did not reject the Fasti Nabonassarei tho' in the same no Account was made of the Hours belonging to the Solar Year and what should move us to pretend to any new Alterations in the Julian Calender which agrees much more with the Celestial Motions For what Detriment is it to the Common-wealth if â—â—e Equinox be fixed now on the 9th or 10th Day of March which in the times of Julius Caesar used to fall out upon the 23d Day of the same Month On the other hand what a Confusion would it be if by rejecting the Julian Year we should be put under a Necessity of rendring useless all the Astronomical Tables and the Julian Period For which Reason it is that Johannes Keplerus who was Mathematician to three Emperours when he compiled his Tabulas Rudolphinas did not follow the Method of Gregorius but retained the Julian Computation Neither need we like Gregorius be at the Charge of many thousand Pounds to find out the Paschal Plenilunes the same being without great Difficulty to be investigated out of the Astronomical Tables where the Equinoxes and Plenilunes have their exact appointed times To be short as the Church does not impair the Civil Power so the Feasts need not interfere with the Imperial Records especially at this time when we may make use of the Words of the (a) Col. 2. v. 16 17. Apostle Let no Man judge you in respect of any Holy Day or the New Moon or of the Sabbath-Days which are a Shadow of things to come CHAP. XXXVI Of the Epocha of the time of Herod and the Reigns of the Foreign Kings over the Jews 1. Herod who afterwards was sirnamed the Great was by Antipater declared Prince of Galilea when he was scarce 15 years of Age. (b) L. 14. c. 17. Antiq. L. 1. c. 8. de Bell. Jud. Josephus 2. This was done after Julius Câ—â—â—r had put a happy Period to the Alexandrian War and had conferr'd great Honours upon Antipater the Father of Herod (c) L. â—4 c. 15. 17. Ant. Jos 3. This same Herod solliciting for Succours against the Parthians was by Anthony and Augustus with Consent of the Senate and People of Rome declared King of Judaea in the 184th Olympiad when C. Domit. Calv. the second time and C. Asin Pollio were Consuls of Rome whose Consulate was coincident with the Year before Christ 40 according to the vulgar Epocha See (d) L. 19. v. 26. Jos 4. The City of Jerusalem was besieged and taken by Herod and Sosius in the Sabbatick Year when M. Agrippa and Canid. Gallus were Consuls at Rome in the 185th Olympiad in the third Month on the Day of their great and solemn Fast on which Day the said City was likewise taken by Pompey 27 years before See (e) L. 14. c. 18. Ant. Josephus These Characters shew the taking of this City to have been coincident with the 37th year before Christ 5. The Battle betwixt Anthony and Augustus was fought near the Promontory of Actium in the 7th year after Herod had taken the City of Jerusalem according to Josephus (f) L. 15. c. 17. which Battle hapned in the 31st year before Christ and in the 15th Julian Year as shall be shewn hereafter 6. Herod was confirmed in the Kingdom and had the Crown which he had laid down of his own accord restored to him when Augustus marched into Egypt which was in the 2 d year after the Battle of Actium and the 30th year before Christ 7. Herod lived but eight Days Josephus says