ledition ugling and deceit disloyalty treason and true malignancy lest according to your own Covenanting words you partake matter mens sins and thereby be in danger to receive of their plagues § 6. But because my intentions are to be brief in my Animadversions I shall pass from this second to the third Article where they tell us That they hall with the same sincerity reality and constancy in their several vocations endeavor with their estates and lives mutually to set the cart before the horse and the tayl of a man above his head to preserve the Rights and Priviledges of Parliament and the Liberties of the Kingdoms and to preserve and defend the Kings Majesties person and Authority with a Jugling Jesuitical King-destroying limitation in the preservation and defence of the true Religion and Liberties of the Kingdoms that the world may bear witness with our consciences of our Loyalty and that we have no thoughts or intentions to diminish His Majeiesties just Power and Greatness This very Article and the notorious Jugling in it were enough to make an understanding person abhor the League eternally and detest the very thoughts of having any thing to do with it and that will appear if we do but consider well their limited defence of their noble Sovereign which in the whole amounts to no defence at all but rather a direct imperious opposition and resistance against His Regal Power and Authority § 7. I have read many of the Leaguers indeed exclaim against the Royalists for asserting That the Covenant tended to the destruction of the King What say they the Covenant tend to the destruction of the King Is there not a particular Clause in it for preservation and defence of the Kings Majesties Person and Authority Yes there is so and so far the words sound some what like Loyalty But what of that Tell me O ye holy Leaguers did you defend the Kings Person in Leaguing together to send Armed men against Him and were you not bound by a subsequent Article of this very Covenant to assist and defend them in such actions Was that the defence of the Kings Person when those rebellions Forces raised and sent by the illegal power of a factious party of the Two Houses then usurping the Supream Authority shot at those who were really risen up in His Majesties defence according to their bounden duty and allegiance and amongst whom in several Battels He had His residence with a Cannon and a Musquet Bullet which makes no difference between a King and Subject the Superior and Inferior Was fighting against him seeling and close imprisoning of him preserving of his Authority Was it not by vertue of this Covenant that Treason before begun was carried on by dint of sword ☞ so long against the pretended Malignants by true Delinquents till the Martyrs Forces through Gods Divine permission were wholly defeated and overcome Did not that force him to surrender himself to a pack of Scottish Presbyterian Judasses Did not their selling him into the hands of Leaguers at Wesiminster cause his Imprisonment I say was not this done by vertue of the Covenant Is not imprisoning of his sacred Person by force of Armes absolute The Law interprets it as a seeking the Princes life when any one seeketh to force the Prince Cook in E of Essexs Case high Treason by the Lawes of this new-risen Kingdom And was not his Imprisonment the true underiable consequence of this Cainish League and Covenant and is it not therefore evil and treasonable and so abominable and not to be kept And was not His Majesties traiterous Imprisonment the immediate Harbinger to his bloody devillish murther Did not one succed the other What then is it less then what the Assertors of Truth and Loyalty said That it tended to the destruction of our Martyred Sovereign and shall that now dare to be pleaded for and asserted for to be still kept by any that fears God or reverences man § 8. But some have said and others may say the same still That though we rose up in arms against the King yet we kept our Oath still for it was with this limitation In the preservation and defence of the true Religion c. and he not following of the one nor maintaining of the other though we fought against him yet we are true Swearers still Oh hellish Clause and Regicidian Limitation what Is that your Loyalty to swear to your King with a Juggle From such Loyalty and all its abettors O Lord deliver all Kings and Princes and more especially and peculiarly s Lament 4. 20. The Breath of our nostrils our now incomparable Sovereign For what Traytors or Rebels wil not swear any oath whatsoever with such a cursed limitation as that to defend their Prince whilest their Prince defends that which such shall please to term the true Religion whilest he preserves that which such t ◠Sav◠10. 27. children of Belial may call the Liberties of the Kingdom The Jesuitical Papists will without any scruple take an Oath to the King with such a limitation as that whereby though afterwards they murther their Prince for not upholding Popery either by powder poison or ponyard they may justifie the true keeping of their oath notwithstanding because he not maintaining their Popes Supremacy nor the abominable Mass of their Romish trumperies their defence of him ceased by such his actual maintenance of another Religion contrary to that which they account the true Nay did not the Sectarian party who took this Covenant which u See Feaks Beam of Light p. 13 in Marg. was magnified most blasphemously when it came into England first as the very Ark of Gods presence and who notwithstanding that afterwards brought their pious Sovereign whom they had swore to defend before their Court of highest Injustice and condemned and executed Him most barbarously before the windows of his own Royal Palace yet pleaded they were not perjured or forsworn because of this remarkable Restriction or special Limitation In desence of the true Religion c. And he being as they most impudently with faces of brass affirmed * Page 29. a desperate enemy to the Lord Jesus his true seed and kingdom and a great friend to Antichrist and the carnal and persecuting Church in all his Kingdoms their murther of Him was no breach of Covenant seemingly made for his defence I am confident he that is a true Christian Protestant will detest such limited Loyalty such jugling destructive defences of his Prince as favouring too much of Jesuitical venome and Anti-monarchical designs wherein a Kings preservation stands altogether upon peoples fancies when they fancy a Religion or the Liberties of a Kingdom to be such as he doth not maintain then farewel Loyalty down goes true Faith and Allegiance and up goes Treason and Rebellion and yet pretend to be his dutiful loyal Subjects too for all that which some may say is impossible but yet such blinde pretences have been
What an illerate Dolt as to the Laws of England have we got here He might as truly argue thus The Petition of Right declared no Oath to be lawful but what should be framed and imposed by Authority of Parliament Ergo The Engagement made by a part of one to be Qui semel modestiae fines transilierit oppor et ut sit gnaviter impudens Cicero Page 182. true and faithful to the Commonwealth without a King or House of Lords is of the nature of those Oathes appointed by Law What the Authority of Parliament is will be easily perceived in the subsequent Discourse wherein you will finde the Opinions of the Reverend Judges and Learned Sages of the Land concerning it more a great deal to be minded then Ipse Dixits then the Chymaerical Dictates of little Mr. Crofton who what he wants in knowledge profoundly supplies with a petty large measure of confidence The Bishop having spoken of what happy days there were before the Covenant came Sure saith d Pa. 53 Crofton those happy days were not real but seeming And why were they seeming For the Covenant he saith doth naturally make for what is truly good What man The Covenant naturally make for what is truly good What have you eaten shame and drunk after it Truly good Sure the goodness that is in it is not real but seeming for the Serpent and your party laid their noddles so together that they would be sure it should tend to nothing but to raise sedition in the State and divisions and sub-divisions in the Church for the Enlargement of the kingdom of your Grand-father the Pope I perceive a lie will not choak these men but a Surplice and a Tippet will make their stomachs wamble The happy days we enjoyed before the devil began to appear in the likeness of an Angel of light and sent forth his sacred Covenant to trap people in his delusions was the envy of all Europe and glory of our English Nation and an everlasting Monument of a gracious Monarch and made evident in the vast mass of Treasure which was so profusely spent afterwards for the maintenance of an horrid and odious Rebellion against His Sacred Majesty and swearing this truly evil Covenant in prosecution thereof which though it was imposed by e See his Speech 5. Dec. 1648. p. 33. 39. a bare Ordinance of part of the two Houses onely without the Kings Royal Assent thereto which by Croftons profound Lawyer Mr. Prynne himself is consessed to be a new Device of that present Parliament as he called it never known nor used in any former Parliaments what ever hath been conceived to the contrary yet our profound Pulpit-prater would needs have us believe that it was imposed by Authority of Parliament And those very words of Mr. Prynne too doth clean overthrow his Brother Classicks dream of the Two Houses Supream Legislative Power What the goodness of that Covenant is which the Irish Parliament declared to be a grand Incentive of Rebellion what Schisms Separations Divisions and Sub-divisions it naturally produced will be pretty well seen in the following Sheets and what the purity of that Discipline and Reformed Religion is which the Covenant was taken for the maintenance of will appear amongst many other Letters that were wrote by this of Gantois a grave and learned Foreigner in the time of that Phaenix Queen Elizabeth who being requested to write his Opinion what effects the Presbyterian Discipline had brought forth in Holland returns this following Answer which is but a part of the whole set down at large by Archbishop Bancroft in his Survey of the Holy Discipline Is any man able saith he to repeat the monstruous Page 456. Heresies and Errors that Holland doth nourish under the shadow of Reformed Religion This is aimed at viz. That the Turpitude of all blasphemies being covered with this cloak may lie hid and that it may be lawful without controulment if any list to recall the old Paganism or to profess Mahomeâ—s Religion or what worse is if there be any thing worse Here 's rare effects of that godly Babe that must be brought forth into the world with a bloody Covenant enough I warrant you to make a man in love with it over the left shoulder Ay but this is not all neither for he tells us That the Magistrates there did suspect this Form of Ecclesiastical Government why because saith he pray mark their reason for it they fear lest it may degenerate into a worse Tyranny then the Spanish Inquisition The Genevians themselves were so hampered with the imperious courses of Calvin and his Companions that they were forced to banish them and after their expulsion they gave this reason for it Tyranni esse voluerunt in Liberam Civitatem voluerunt novum Pontificatum revocare They would have been Tyrants over a free City they would have recalled a new Papacy Calvin ad Farel Epist 6. p. 11. And Carter one of the Disciplinarian Gang writing to his friend Field from Embden in the time of Qu. Elizabeth tells him That if he did see the confused state of the Churches of those Countreys he would say that England how bad soever was a paradise in comparison What a damnable Discipline is this that its very Idolizers as well as others should so terribly exclaim of the mischievous effects of it And that we may see with what wonderful wisdom and with what grave Divines it was at first brought forth into the world Calvin himself the Father of it will give us a clear Testimony f In illa promiscua colluvie suffragiis fuimus superiores In that confused off-scouring of the whole multitude we had the most voices Calvin to Bullinger Epist 107. Here was the first rise and product of it in a confused multitude onely Calvin and his party got the upper hand for it by most voices which makes me throw in this one query amongst the party Where is the divinity or divine institution of that Ecclesistical Government which is clearly beholden to most voices in a confused multitude for its Establishment What the genuine result of Establishment of this confused Discipline so much contended for by the Covenanting party with us in England hath been in forein parts their several Testimonies have made apparent What it hath been in Scotland the Primates Fair Warning hath shown as manifest and what it hath been here in England since they removed the Prelatical Yoke from off their shoulders by their Covenanting endeavors their own serious Confession hereafter inserted is a most convincing testimony against themselves If any shall now demand or enquire why this subsequent Discourse no sooner saw the light Let them be pleased to satisfie themselves with that which follows That the Author having dispatch'd the first part thereof was by extraordinary occasions in the country diverted from further prosecuting of it the last summer season and coming up this Winter time to the City again his worldly
the times of Popish Egyptian darkness shall any pretending to true Protestantism which severely declaims all such perfidious Antichristian courses be found to be so far approvers of such infamous actions as to commend them for examples to others to tread in the same steps Can Subjects combining and swearing together to extirpate the legal established Church-Government of a Nation as Bishops were and are still here though the leg exercise of their Coercive power in the Star-Chamber and High Commission Courts was taken away by the Act in 1641. to prevent the subsequent Rebellion and Jesuitical-Combinations of Leaguing Presbyters and vowing to assist one another in their Covenanted Rebellion with their lives and fortunes against the express command of the supream Governor for the attaining of their Leaguing ends be called and stiled Commendable by any one pretending some affinity to Loyalty or Christianity which are inseparable and the constant attendants upon a true fearer of the Lord It 's a brave time with Rebels when their Treason and disloyalty are enrolled amongst the Records of Fame and Honour and their obedient opposites to the commands of their lawful Prince are in the very act of Loyalty tearmed and Recorded for terrible Delinquents against the thing which Nick-named it self so often A Parliament Halcyon daies for Sacrilegious Schismaticks when that which is condemned by the word of God nothing more shall be garnished forth with an Epethite of Commendable though what the Prophet by God's express command said so long ago that do I say now unto these strangers to Truth and Loyalty b Isaiah 5. 20. Wo unto them that call evil good and good evil § 2. They tell us too It was according to the practice of Gods people in other Nations Aha! What Gods people and Covenanting Rebels too What Reformers and swearing Extirpaters of the Episcopal promoters of the Reformation Saints and yet Schismaticks Christians and yet Traytors Surely our Covenanters were put to extream hard straits to make lies their refuge for their carrying on of their extirpating Reformation No other way to catch people into the black Road with them but by blinding their eyes with Errors and Contradictions A sad geneneration of Merozians It s true indeed the Guisian Leaguers in France went directly in the same impious courses before them unless they be their Gods people I know none for they alone were the Monsters that our Leaguers could properly say they were imitators of because they went to their hellish work with an Oath like ours and yet Guise himself like ours too had the face to tell his Prince That he was his faithful subject for all that Who as the Translator of a Parisians Work tells us living under c See the right of Kings and duty of subjects Pref. a milde and peaceable Prince slandered their King that he was an enemy to the Roman Catholick Religion as our Covenanters did the late Carolian Martyr to be an enemy to the Protestant and under the fair pretence of Religion screwed themselves into the favour of the Common people who are usually deceived by such pretences raising a strong party against the King by the name of the holy League which caused much confusion in that kingdom as by too sad and lamentable experience we have found to be the effects of our English Leaguers in this And now I appeal to the conscience of any man living whether they that can first Rebel against their d For so they swore the King was only Supream Governour and then have the confidence to tell us of a thing which never was like that of the man in the Moon and set it down with such a positive Asseveration as making it a pattern for their illegal traitorous undertakings and stile that Commendable which if any such thing had ever been ought to be abhorred as much as hell by him that desires the Rules of Christianity I say I appeal to the Conscience of any man living who desires not to be ensnared and kept so with the e See Mr. Reynell's Panegyrik intituled The unfortunate Change Caledonian Boar which was the cause of our distempers whether they that speak these lies and juglings these palpable falshoods and deceits could possibly have according to their assertion Before their eyes the glory of God and the advancement of the kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ whose f See Mr. Quarrel 's Loyal Convert P. 5. glory will not be vindicated by such unlawful means and unwarrantable proceedings and whose kingdom is endeavoured to be pulled down by such a peerless Covenant But what 's it they swear that must have a juggling Preface to set it forth Why they tell us in their first Article That they will sincerely really and constantly through the grace of God as though that would ever square with such proceedings endeavour in their severall places and callings the Preservation of the Reformed Religion in the Church of Scotland in Doctrine Worship Discipline and Government according to the word of God and the example of the best Reformed Churches § 3. What have I to do with the reglement of Foreign Churches * See his Fair warning P. 1 said the Reverend Primate and so say I too What had English men to do to swear to preserve the Doctrine and Discipline of another Countrey Let them stand or fall to their own Master Ay but here was the Mystery We have an earnest longing desire to have Bishops extirpated and we having followed the pattern of our dear Scottish Brethren in rising up in arms against our King for that purpose and being not well able and sufficient of our selves to carry on our design against them we must call in the other to our aid and they will not come to us unless we will swear to set up their Church-way amongst us and therefore rather then Bishops shall stand we will do it For as the late Martyr said upon the Covenant nothing will induce them to engage till those that called them in have pawned thier souls to them by a solemn League and Covenant I am verily perswaded that there was not one amongst a hundred that swore that League to preserve the Scottish Discipline that knew no more what their Discipline was then a horse and so they swore with a blinde implicite faith to preserve they knew not what themselves Pure good swearing is it not Was this sworn in Truth Judgement and Righteousness as the Prophet saith an Oath should Jer. 4. 2. If not as it was not Is not therefore such mens swearing unlawful and so to be renounced and repented of Is it not an abominable wickedness in any one to swear to preserve the Scottish Discipline or when sworn to keep such a wicked Oath when the Reverend Primate hath made it appear by such cogent and undeniable Arguments of truth and sound Divinity beyond the reach and power of a Crofton or any Presbyterian adversary to answer without palpable
made by those who had nothing else to say for themselves and their illegal courses being assisted too by such a Learned Assembly of so many Divines who after a Three years Conference most profoundly voted God to be the Father § 9. And yet notwithstanding this Anti-monarchical limitation they declare they did set it down that the world might bear witness of their Loyalty they might have said Jugling and Rebellion for that is the true english of such a limited Loyalty and that they have no thoughts to diminish His Majesties just power and greatness No question but the world would did and have sufficiently taken notice of that which they call their Loyalty and have found it to be such as their Guisian Leaguing Brethrne practised who under pretence of x 2 Sam. 15. 7 8. maintaining w See The Right of Kings in Marg. the Roman Catholick Religion as these did for that which they usually mis-called the Reformed undermined the Kings Authority and sought to advance themselves the very same which Absalom the Beautiful Rebel showed to his Father when under a fair colour of Evil Councellors at Court and under a plausible pretence of paying his vow he made to the Lord in Hebron he * verse 6. stole the hearts of the men of Israel from their due allegiance to their King and drew them †verse 11 in their simplicity into a damnable Rebellion with him and therefore he that is loyal in practises and works will never approve of these Westmonasterian Leaguers loyalty which onely consists in words whilest their actions declares nothing else but Treason and Rebellion unless y See A Vindication of King Charls by noble Mr. Symmons p. 40. when they are in Cathedris in their seats as Parliament-men they are all as infallible as the Pope and have a power as well as he to do what they please to make evil good and good evil to make Rebellion and Treason to be Duty and Loyalty and duty and loyalty to be Rebellion and Treason to vote sacriledge murder and theft to be no sins killing slaying and destroying to be acts of zeal and christian duty Till then their loyalty will appear in the eyes of all judicious men to be no better then a Wolf in Sheeps clothing As for their disclaymer of diminishing His Majesties just power and greatness upon search and inquiry after it we shall find it to be a chip of the old block a parcel of contradictions like the other of preserving the Kings person with a destructive limitation and therefore I again thus Quaere Is the taking the Antient right of the Militia from him which was never for z See The Royalists Defence p. 97. the space of 1700. years past questioned or disputed until by these usurpers injuriously wrested from the Crown but hath been time out of mind inherent in the King a See Iudge Jenkins Lex Terrae p. 37. The practise of all times and the custom of the Realm no diminishing his Majesties just power Was the justifying the war by a party of the two Houses the Kings sworn Subjects against the Martyr to be warrantable both in point of law and conscience and making a deforming Reformation without the consent and against the express prohibition of their Dread Soveraign and not onely so but justifying for a commendable practise the iniquity of Witchcraft which Rebellion is termed by the Prophet was this no diminishing His Majesties just greatness What do they think English men are made of What are all made up of a bundle of contradictions that they impose such juglings upon us Surely the power of the Militia in the King was a very just necessary power and he being b See A Letter to a Member p. 5. under God the Protector of the Law I wonder how he could could defend it and the d Priviledges of Parliament without the power of the sword and the greatness of His Majesties over all in his dominions was very just too if either the laws of God or of this Land or an oath of Supremacy are able to make it so And yet forsooth people must be forced by vertue of an illegal Anti-parliamentary League not onely to be c See The Animadversions upon General Monk's Letter to the Gentry of Devon p. 4. ingaged in the wars against the King and so thereby become perjured and faithless persons and to swear to assist all those that shall do so too in order to the taking away the Kings Negative voice and the power of the Militia from him which was one of those jurisdictions priviledges preeminencies and authorities belonging to the Kings Highness His Heirs and successors and united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm which every one of the Parliamenteers as they were called had by a solemn legal Sacred oath of Supremacy sworn to assist and defend to his power but also hipocritically to say no worse to sware too that for all that they have no thoughts of diminishing His Majesties just power and greatness Was there ever such jugling seen that men should endeavour to take away that from their King which is his just right and yet sware with their right hands lifted up to the most high God that they have no thoughts to diminish it Ay and sware too that they had before their eyes at this present the honor and happiness of the Kings Majesty and his posterity in what part of the world can these mens peers be found as to the art of jugling and contradictions in their oaths Where may we find a pattern of their venemous courses but among the damned Guisian leaguers in France who murdered their King with a promise of fidelity and of their being his true and faithful Subjects And yet this this is that Covenant God wot that notwithstanding it set us together by the ears and put us all in blood and confusion must be still kept to inrol us amongst mad men for ever This jugling and contradictions in this ungodly Covenant cannot but be contrary to the nature of a true oath which as the Prophet saith must be made in Truth righteousness and in Judgement and therefore unlawful and not to be kept by any without an evident disobedience to the command of the Lord expressed by the said Prophet to the men of Israel § 10. And though they can tell us in their sixth Article That this Cause and League of theirs so much concerns the glory of God the good of the kingdoms and the honor of the King yet I demand and they may answer me if they can Was is it ever heard spoke before by men that pretend a fear towards God that that which is a most horrible breach of the Laws of God could ever tend to his glory and was not this Rebellions Covenant and covenant Rebellion against the Martyr directly a breach of the Divine Precept spoken by the mouth of his blessed St. Peter d 1 Pet. 2. 13.
To submit our selves to the King as Supream and that for the Lords sake and did they not swear his Supremacy yea that he was the onely Supream Governor thereby implicitely denying upon Oath any Co-ordinates with him in the exercise of the Supremacy and therefore can perjury and disobedience to the Laws of our Creator be affirmed by any one not possessed with a deep frenzy to concern the glory of God It s true indeed when the Jews crucified our Savior it was out of a pretended tenderness to the glory of God and when our English-Jewish Tygres had murthered their lawful Sovereign it was meerly as they pretended for the advancement of Christs kingdom but that such actions as either of those concerned either the glory of God or the advancement of his Sons kingdom is onely a demonstration of the Assertors strong delusions for it plainly intimates unto us e See the Right Rebel p. 121. That there is a special work of Satan in it when such a strong delusion is sent unto men that they should believe such an Antichristian Lie tendred unto them under the colour of a Christian truth as the Doctrine of Rebellion is But this is just like the Second of the good of the kingdoms and therefore to that I again thus Quaere Was there not a War begun by a pack of true Delinquents got into the House of Commons and that they were such I appeal to the judgement of the Law Did not that war as all wars do tend to impoverish and oppress the Kingdom Was not this League sworn to carry it on and not to leave off whether to make defection to the contrary part or to give themselves to a detestable indifferency or neutrality in this cause of rebellion till they had fulfilled their mischeivous traiterous ends Can then that Covenant which binds people as this certainly did and doth to continue the imbroyling of a Nation or Kingdom in blood confusion perjury and Rebellion concern so much the good of it Can that which stirs up people to pursue the impoverishing taxing and inslaving of a kingdome for whither did the Rebelling and rising up in Arms and swearing men to continue therein tend but to that be affirmed by any except Frantick bedlamers to concern the good and benefit of it And lastly for the honor of the King for he and his honor are put at the fag end of all in this perfidious League I further again Quaere Is it for the honor of the King to have his subjects rebel against him Is it for the happiness of the King and his Posterity to have all his Assistants and Adherents destroyed as much as their fellow-subjects can under the black false notion of Evil Councellors and Malignants Did not the Covenant binde the takers to such things as those Let them deny it with truth if they can Can that Covenant which binds men to disloyalty and treason though hypocritically and lyingly pretending loyalty which doth not better the evil nor antidote the venome in it The devil though he appeares as an angel of light sometimes to ensnare men the more easily in his delusions yet he is but a black devil still for all that and therefore I may justly and truly make my Question thus Can that Covenant which binds men to disloyalty and treason and to break the Laws of this Land be any thing less then Antichristian And is it not therefore damnable and abominable and to be abhorred of every one that desires to observe the dictates of Gods good Spirit in the sacred Canon of Scripture Undoubtedly every one that understands the true ways of advancing the glory of God the honor of the King and the good of the kingdoms will hold himself obliged and bound to desie this Covenant as the very sink of Jesuitism and high-way to hell it self and he that hath ever read and considered well the Sacred Canon and the undeniable truth of what our Carolian Martyr bid the Scotch Parliament always f See Reliquiae Sacrae Carolinae the last printed Letter ☞ remember That as the best foundation of Loyalty is Christianity so trâ—e Christianity teaches perfect Loyalty for without this Reciprocation neither is truly what they pretend to be will finde cause enough to refuse the taking of and if taken to renounce and abjure such a seditious Vow and Covenant which ties men to continue Rebels all the days of their lives for he that shall swear to extirpate a sort of men whose Function is establish'd by the great Charter of our Liberties in absolute breach of the Law and against the Command of his Prince and endeavour to bring to pass his extirpation by force of Arms which is high Treason and swear that he will all the days of his life zealously and constantly continue therein against all opposition That man by any reasonable person will be concluded a sworn Rebel and to continue by vertue of his Oath without a just renunciation a Traitor to his King as long as breath remains in his body to enable him to carry on the intentions and purposes of it And yet this is the League that such a stir and clutter is kept about some mens Christian and loyal breaking of it and though some of its unlucky Patrons are pleased to alledge for its goodness that part of the Clause of the first Article wherein it is said according to the word of God and the examples of the best Reformed Churches yet I affirm That that doth no more prove what they intend by bringing of that Allegation then the * 2 Cor. 11. 14. devils being transformed into an angel of light doth prove that he was in reality that into which he was transformed then the †Matth. 7. 15. false prophets coming to us in sheeps clothing doth prove that they are not inwardly ravening wolves then the Pharisees ‖ Matth. 23. 21. appearing outwardly righteous unto men is a convincing Argument to prove that within they were not full of hypocrisie and iniquity § 11. But lastly they tell us That they profess and declare before God and the world their unfeigned desire to be humbled for their own sins and for the sins of these Kingdoms especially that they have not as they ought valued the inestimable benefits of the Gospel that they have not laboured for the purity and power thereof and that they have not endeavored to receive Christ in their hearts nor to walk worthy of him in their Lives No it 's very true for if they had we should never have seen an ungospel-like unchristian Rebellion raised and sworn to be upholden against our gracious King painted over with a plausible pretence against some pretended evil Councellors nor an Anti-legal jugling self-contradictory League sworn for the Dathanian extirpation of the great upholders of Monarchy and it's just Rights Priviledges Preeminencies and Authorities against the several Incroachments of Papists and Presbyters of Jesuites and Sectaries They complain there indeed
his lawful Sovereign to pray that God would be with him were not a Petition but a Presumption for though it be true that Almighty God doth sometimes suffer for reasons best known to himself such wretches to prosper in their wicked ways yet they cannot either justly expect or religiously desire it and by how much the more devoutly they seem to undertake such attempts by so much the more abominable they are in the eyes of God who never more abhorreth Rebellion then when it is masked with Religion and Devotion Do they think it was no sin in them for to make such an horrible conclusive prayer as that which is here made for a close to their Covenant If they say no then a pack of thieves who lye in wait for to spoil men of their goods and estates and sometimes of their lives may pray to God too for prosperity in their pilfering courses that is in plain English to bless them in their disobedience to him with success for it and count their prayer in such case lawful too and so Absalom and his deluded confederates might most humbly beseech God to bless them with such success against King David that they might not onely usurp his Authority and cast him out of his Throne but that other of their neighbour Nations might be encouraged by their example to do the like to their own Kings and so of any other whatsoever in the commission of any villany if they can but first have the courage to do the thing without fear of punishment and in expectation of praise for it and then can have but the confidence most humbly to beseech God as our Leaguers Cant it to bless them with success in it if they say yes then I hope their Covenant ought to be abolished and renounced as being what it is undoubtedly sinful in the matter of it I remember Mr. Croftons profound Lawyer Mr. Prynne in his printed Treatises hath told us That the unparallel'd proceedings of those who unjustly usurped the title of Parliament though their title was onely in nomine non re in name not in reality in relation to their barbarous murther of their Lord and Sovereign to whom they had sworn to bear true faith and allegiance and to their traiterous banishing of his incomparable Heir through a quaternary of perjuries have given occasion m See his Republicans and others Spurious good Old Cause briefly and truely Anatomized p. 17. to all our Popish adversaries not onely to traduce deride reproach blaspheme our Protestant Profession as some of them have done in print as a meer Seminary of Treason Rebellion Sedition Hypocrisie Perjury Disloyalty and all sorts of villany but to combine together in a HOLY LEAGUE to extirpate it and all Professors of it out of the world And n See his True and perfect Narrative p. 55. to massacre eradicate them as a company of Traitors Antimonarchists Regicides Hypocrites Rebels and seditious persons And made it great matter of lamentation as it is undoubtedly to every good Christian that men pretending to fear God should ever give such an irrepairable scandal to Christianity And I have no sooner set down that Gentlemans words but I presently finde that there was occasion enough given by their warlike Covenant to turn the edge of these Covenanters words upon themselves for they having rebelled against their Sovereign as it were for Gods sake for the further strengthning of themselves in their wicked courses combined by League and Covenant not onely to proceed on further in their rising up in Arms against their supream Legislator for the glory of God a practice as a loyal Scotch Minister o See Scotlands late misery bewailed p. 14. saith inconsistent with sound divinity against all orthodox doctrine a practice contrary to Scripture contrary to the doctrine of the ancient Church and their practice contrary to the Confession of Faith No King upon the accompt of his intellectuals morals or religion being to be suspended from the exercise of his Government or denied submission too by his Subjects but also to continue therein all the days of their lives against all lets and impediments whatsoever for the peace and safety of the three kingdoms which as they are notorious contradictions in themselves like the rest of their Jugling League by being instrumental to the dishonor of God in the horrible breaking of his Laws and directly opposite to the peace of this kingdom as well as all others where such Antichristian prayers are put in practise in being acted so rebelliously to the praise and glory of the man of sin to the pulling down of the kingdom of our most blessed Savior and to the everlasting disgrace of true Christianity even of the true Protestant Religion which vehemently exclaims against all such seditious Antimonarchical ways and principles So with every rational man that knows there must be a flame kindled before a house can be burned that the King had never bin murthered by prosperous Rebels if the flame of Sedition and Treason had not first set the kingdom a burning and for a man to make a flame in a house and by that flame at length that house is burned and destroyed and then to say he never intended the house should have been destroyed savours of little less then frenzy and will hardly ever excuse his innocency in it These Leaguers had first raised a war and vowed and swore the prosecution thereof against the Martyr and the sword-men taking advantage of the Military power which by the Covenanters means they had obtained executed their villany in their villanous act of Regicide and yet the former would perswade the world that they never intended it which if the rising up in arms had not first bin practised the murther would then have never bin heard of which being so evident to any mans understanding this conclusion naturally flows from the premises That their rebellious Actings against the King in the behalf of a Faction of the Two Houses that had renounced all allegiance save in order to that which they called Religion do give as great occasion as the murther to foreign Princes to extirpate as much as in them lies the professors of the Protestant Religion to prevent them from rising up in arms against them lest their prosperity in such ways of darkness should invite them at length to attempt to serve them ☞ there as the renowned Martyr was here after he had been by vertue of this hellish black Covenant fought against and all his Forces overcome and as the immediate fruits issues and effects thereof first sold then imprisoned and afterwards delivered to his perjured Subjects to be crucified Finally for a conclusion to this Covenanting Prayer which the famous University of Oxford affirmed their hearts trembled to think that they should be required to pray it I shall here subjoyn the judicious and memorable thoughts of that then loyal conscientious University which I finde expressed in the following words
imposers thereof are guilty of the highest crime Now can that oath be said by any man in his right wits to be warranted by the Laws of the Land which is directly opposite and contrariant to them and for which the imposers may be hanged at Tyburn for the gallows have commonly been the immediate fate and consequence of that highest crime of Treason This Covenant was thrust down the Throats of many people not by an Act of Parliament which must have been made as the Petition of Right and all other Laws and Acts have been by the King and all the Lords and Commons but by an Ordinance as it was called of a packt black faction of the then never to be forgotten two Houses which serves for nothing but to * p. 84. record to posterity a lawless distemper'd time A thing so far from being warranted by the Laws of the Land that such a thing was never heard of till these latter times of Treason and Sacriledge Rebellion and Confusion when mens brains began to be possessed of the effects and virtues of a Midsommer-moon Again can that be warranted by the Laws of the land which is so far a breach of those laws as it s esteemed high Treason u p. 22. 40. Arising to alter religion established or any Law is Treason saith the reverend Judge And did not the thing which Crofton will needs have to be a Parliament arise to alter the religion and was not this league devised to keep men under an oath for the doing and assisting of them in it Let Jack Presbyter deny it if he can In the second Article of this Covenant the takers swore to endeavour to extirpate Arch-bishops Bishops c. which is absolute contrary to Magna Charta which in the 25th of Edw. 3. chap. 1. 2. is declared to be the common Law of the Land chap. 1. and the last Salvae fint Episcopis omnes libertates suae That the Bishops shall have all their whole Rights and Liberties inviolable and this great Charter the Judge tells us p. 62. is confirmed by no less then 32 Acts of Parliament and in the 42th of Edw. 3. The first chapter enacts That if any Statute be made to the contrary it shal be holden for none and therefore their impious lawless League in this respect is far enough from being warranted by the Laws of this Land being so notoriously against the very Charter of our Liberties Again the Leaguers declared as Crofton himself told us lately for I am scarce old enough to remember the doing of it That they Abolished the Common-prayer Book in pursuance of their Covenant Very good This very book which they pretended to abolish with the power of an illegal ordinance was not onely compiled by true Martyrs and Reformers and practised in the times of four Princes but was and is still p. 62. notwithstanding their Rebellious Ordinance setled by no less then five Acts of Parliament And therefore their Covenant being in that act also contrary to the Lawes All Ministers and others that have taken this Oath must teach themselves and others according to the exhorters own assertion for I love to take men at their words that such oaths call for repentance and not pertinacy in them it being proved to be so far from being warranted by the Laws of the Land that it is an absolute breach of above 26 of them § 15. I remember The Leaguers in their Disputes and Arguments ☞ against the wearing of the Surplice and performance of other commendable Ceremonies of our best Reformed Church of England do out of their wise Noddles send forth such doughty windy Affirmations as will excellently wel serve to prove the unlawfulness of their Covenant Let a man go and ask them why they will not wear the Surplice and live in conformity to the Rites and Customs of the Church they 'l tell him because they are unlawful and why are they unlawful because God hath no where commanded them to be done in the Scripture though in any wise mans judgement there can be no unlawfulness in a thing without it be a breach of some Law which hath forbid it and where they will finde that Law against the Surplice and Ceremonies its possible they 'l tell us when they are able and their ability for that end will be I believe Ad Grecas Calendas but not well before Now according to their own ways of arguing I shall make this retortion That God hath no where in the Scripture commanded subjects in case of a default made by the Prince or that he will not consent to any Reformation to rise up in Arms and rebel against him and swear an Oath to do it themselves without any Royal Consent at all and let any of the Pack make it appear if they can For for them to set down the examples of the Oaths and Covenants Kings and Subjects joyntly made for a Reformation when they are demanded to show a pattern for their Covenant is no more to the purpose then to say Queen Elizabeth and her Nobles made a Reformation in this kingdom to pull us out of the mist of Popish darkness no more satisfaction to a Quaerist then as the Reverend Dr. Pierce told one of his Antagonists for a man when he is asked what 's a Clock To answer a windmil or a pump for the question is not whether Kings and Subjects may joyntly swear a Reformation of Abuses either in Church or State for there is no body I think wil stand to dispute that but whether in case a King will not make that extirpating Reformation his Subjects would have him whether they may do this without his consent by Oaths and rising up in Armes which is palpable rebellion u See the League illegal p. 17. Where doth God command the English to swear to preserve the Scotch Discipline and Liturgy which they themselves have often varied Or to abjure Episcopacy which was the onely Government of the Church for more then 1500 years and under whose shade Christian Religion most flourished and the Church stretched forth her branches to the Rivers and her boughs to the ends of the earth Where doth the Scripture warrant much less command the association of two kingdoms and joyntly taking up Arms in the Quarrel of the Gospel and defending and propagating Religion by the sword And let them answer that or let their silence conclude their being convinced I say again God never commanded Subjects any where in the Scripture to make a Reformation without their Princes consent by arms And therefore to deal with them with their own weapons according to their own ways of disputations against the Ceremonies I affirm that their Covenant is wicked and unlawful and being an unlawful sinful Oath by the resolution and judgement of all Casuists it ought not to be pleaded for nor taken or if once taken to be kept by any that ever took it because x See The Fair
Warning p. 30. To observe a wicked engagement doubles the sin according to the found determinations of the Reverend Primate And so my Argument herein I am sure ad hominem is unanswerable § 16. The next thing that will come under examination will be the unlawfulness of the Covenant in respect of its contrariety to the two former legally established Sacred Oaths of Supremacy and Allegiance and the Protestation and to that end I commend to the consideration of my Readers the excellent Determination of the Irish Primate in relation to this point in his incomparable Fair Warning to take heed of the Scottish Discipline p. 31. Where after he had affirmed That a Supervenient Oath or Covenant either with God or man cannot take away the obligation of a just Oath precedent he immediately addes But such is the Covenant a subsequent Oath inconsistent with and destructive to a precedent Oath that is the Oath of Supremacy which all the Church-men throughout the kingdom and all Parliament men at their Admission to the House and all persons of quality thoughout England have taken The former oath acknowledgeth the King to be the only Supream Head that is Civil Head to see that every man do his duty in his calling and Governor of the Church of England The second Oath or Covenant to set up the Presbyterian Government as it is in Scotland denieth all this virtually makes it a Political Papacy acknowledgeth no Governors but onely the Presbytery The former Oath gives the King the Supream Power over all persons in all causes The second gives him a power over all as they are Subjects but none at all in Ecclesiastical causes This saith he they make to be Sacriledge And therefore I Quaere 1. Whether he that hath taken the legally established Oath of Supremacy to His Sacred Majesty which as a Paraphrast very well noteth y See The Oathes of Supremacy Allegiance which have layen dead many years c. p. 10. Admits of no Rival in the Throne but doth exclude all others from the Supremacy from being enabled to act above His Majesty or contrary unto Him or without Him or his allowance in any acts of Government can take this illegal Covenant whereby he swears according to his utmost power not onely to carry on the Rebellion then already begun for that it was so needs no further demonstration but also to assist all other persons that shall take it in what they shall do in pursuance thereof thereby implicitly owning the power of the then two Houses and disowning the Onely Supremacy of the King so clearly asserted in that Oath I say whether he that hath taken the former can ever swear the latter without a notorious guilt of apparent Perjury If not as no man I think upon serious consideration will affirm he may then it necessarily follows that the one is an opposition to the other Again The Oath of Supremacy bindes the takers to their power to assist and defend all Jurisdictions Priviledges Preheminences and Authoritys granted or belonging to the Kings Highness and united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm And the famous University of Oxford have told us That y See their Reasons p. 38. the whole power of ordering all matters Ecclesiastical was by the Laws of the Land in express words For ever annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm citing the Statute for it in their Margin whence I Quaere Secondly Whether he that hath once taken the Oath of Supremacy and afterwards swallowed down this Regicidian League was not desperatly forsworn in taking upon them the ordering of Ecclesiastical matters which is one of those Jurisdictions and Priviledges granted to the Kings Highness so far as to swear the Extirpation of the Legally established Ecclesiastical Government without and against his Majesties Royal assent one while swearing to defend the Jurisdiction and Preeminence granted or belonging to the King and another while vowing the performance of that which is absolutely contrariant unto it And Perjury attained by taking of two Oaths in my shallow judgement doth unavoidably imply the vast proportion of difference and contrariety that is between them Since the writing of these last words I heard of the burning of the Solemn League and Covenant by the hands of the Common Hangman according to the Noble Order of the truely Honourable two Houses May 22. 1661. now at this present assembled in Parliament by vertue of his Majesties Gracious Writ which as it is no more then its deserts in having bewitched people into an odious Rebellion against their Prince which as one saith well z See the Right Rebel p. 72. Must needs be acknowledged a sin of Sodom especially since the Sodomites are the first that the Holy Ghost in Scripture hath taxed for the practise thereof So I shall desist from saying here any more of this Loyal Vote concerning that monstrous League but shall now go on to the finishing of what I have here intended to show the sinfulness thereof in its contrariety to former Legal Oaths and to that end and purpose shall again Quaere Thirdly Can that Oath Which * was devised onely to ** See his Majesties Proclamation prohibiting the taking of it prevent peace and to engage the Kings good subjects in the maintenance of an horrid and odious Rebellion against him as this wicked League did any way accord with an Oath of Allegiance which solemnly bound all its takers to bear true faith and Allegiance to his Majesty and to defend him to the uttermost of their power against all attempts and conspiracies whatsoever therefore against that damnable one of the then two Houses which shall be made against his Person Crown and Dignity Fourthly Can this subsequent seditious and trayterous Vow and Covenant which endeavours to withdraw the subjects from their natural Allegiance which they owe unto their Prince they are his * Majesties own words and engages them in acts of High Treason by the express letter of the Statute of the 25. of King Edward the 3. be any way consonant or agreeable with two preceding Oaths which expresly obliges them to bear to the King truth and faith of life members and earthly honour and to a See the oathes of Allegiance and Supremacy c. p. 15. appear for the defence of him of his Person and Government against all attempts against them by any whatsoever upon any pretences soever Can any be so wilde and frantick as to make such an affirmation Fifthly How can that Oath which bindes men absolutely to bear true faith and Allegiance to the King without any relation to his good or bad Government sute with an Apostate that is sworn with a cursed destructive limitation to defend him so long as he shall continue in the preservation of that which the swallower thereof shall fancifully call the true Religion and Liberties of the Kingdom and no longer See more of this in the excellent Scotch-Covenant condemned That
the personal consent of the King as they must certainly have if what Croftons dreaming fancy suggests to him be true That they have the Supream Legislative power is such a ridiculous Bull as never was heard or thought of until this frantick Parliament Therefore when either or both Houses without the King take upon them to make Laws they extend beyond the bounds of their Commission they thereby act of their own head not as Representatives And as he saith in another place * p. 109. These things are done by the Members not in their Politick but in their Natural capacities they are not Acts of Parliament but unlawful Facts of Parliament men Thus that Author If he be King of a kingdom saith g Mr. Duncomb then all the people joyntly or severally in his kingdom are under his command and if under his command then he onely hath power to give them Laws be they in one Collective body as in Parliament at the Kings House or Simple bodies at their private dwellings Le Roy fait les Leix avec le consent du Seigneurs et Communs et non pas les Seigneurs et Communs avec le consent du Roy Is the voice of the Common Law the King makes Laws in Parliament with the consent of the Lords and Commons and not the Lords and Commons with the consent of the King Virg. 7. Aeneid Hoc priami gestamen erat cum Jura vocatis More daret Populis And 5. Aeneid Gaudet Regno Trojanus Arestes Indicitque forum patribus dat Jura vocatis The Lords and Cowmons have power onely to propound and advise it is onely the Kings Le Roy le vieult which makes the Law their Propositions and advice signifie nothing if the King saith Le Roy se Avisera It would be strange if the Assembly of the Subjects together should make them Masters over their Sovereign who gave them power to assemble and hath power to turn them home again when he pleaseth Legum ac Edictorum probatio aut publicatio quae in Curia vel Senatu fieri solet non arguit imperii Majestatem in Senatu vel Curia inesse saith Bodin De Repub. lib. 1. cap. 8. The publishing and approbation of Laws and Edicts which is made ordinarily in the Court of Parliament proves not the Majesty of the State to be in the said Court or Parliament It is the Kings Scepter which giveth force to the Law and we have no Law but what is his will Thus far he That there is enough already cited to prove that all our Presbyters prating about the two Houses Co-ordinacy and share and yet their Supremacy too in the Legislative power * Observe this puddle of Treasonable Lawless contradictions but Sharers in a thing and yet Supream which admits of no Co-ordinacy are meer nullities as King James told Cardinal Perron h See his Defence of the Right of Kings p. 14. upon another account Chimerical projects matters of a floating imagination and built upon false pre-suppositions is evident enough to my shallow understanding whatever it may be to those of deeper reach and unless Mr. Crofton thought he should meet with none but Notorious blockheads * P. 195. more blunt witted then a Whetstone as King James tells the Presbyters Compeer the Cardinal upon the Common account for the Popes and Discipliniarians power over Kings he would never have endeavoured to draw people to believe by his perswasion that the two Houses are not onely Co-ordinate and sharers but also rightful owners of the Supream Legislative power But that I may hasten to a final period of my discourse I shall in order thereunto consider Mr. Croftons ready consent to that Seditious Book which the Dreaming Author entitused The long Parliament revived set forth by his Sacred Malignant Brother Drake under the disguised name of Thomas Phillips which first implies the Seditious and Treasonable nature of the subject matter of it and his being ashamed or at lest fearful to own or avow by setting his right name to it And then Secondly his carrying on his Factious ends and purposes with colourable pretences of Loyalty according to the constant practise of the Covenanting Party i See Pres. bytery Popish not Episcopacy P. 7. The credit of whose false Doctrine is well enough known from Dan to Beersheba was the very leaven wherewith the people were first moulded into a sour lump of armed malice against their Sovereign for he knew well enough nothing could be more destructive to his Majesties interest then that Pestiferous Pamphlet he then set forth which being Examined by the Lords and Commons in Parliament in the moneth of November 1660. was found as the Journal saith to be Scanda'ous and Seditious and a charge by them ordered to be drawn up against the Author and the Book to be burned by the hand of the Common Hangman So easie and usual is it for Presbyters to gainsay the truth of what upon serious consideration of the whole loyal body of the Lords and Commons in Parliament was voted Seditious and to be burnt by the hands of Sacred Doctor Dunne the only Phisician for a certain infallible cure of a Covenanters brainsick disease of Sedition and Rebellion and yet so ready to brand others with the black mark of Malignant Popish vipers Illiterate Ignorant Injudicious Court Doctors and Lawyers and Anti-Parliamental Momusses who should so far dare to be honest as to resist a Covenanter in standing up in the defence of the good old English Laws and rejecting and disalowing of the Legislative power so called of the Illegal Arbitrary Votes and Orders of that unparellel'd Rebellious Faction in the two Houses of that Long Parliament which is so Seditiously affirmed to be Revived to embrew the Nation again in Treason and Rebellion in Murther and King-killing for the enlargement of the Kingdom of Jesus Christ. As for his disloyal fancy of the Long-Parliament-Rebels continuance nothwithstanding the Murder of their Onely Supream Head and Governour let him but read Judge Jenkins at large proving before the Regicide what I shall give now but the heads of in brief k That the two Houses did not then act by the Kings Writ but contrary unto it and so their Acts were null That the Act for continuing the Parliament so long as both houses please is void because it is First Against Common right for thereby Parliament men will not pay their debts and they may do wrong to others Impune besides the utter destruction of all mens actions who have to do with Parliament men by the Statute of Limitations 21. Jac. Secondly Against Common reason for Parliaments were made to redress publick grievances not to make them Thirdly Impossible the death of his Majesty * For the King was then alive whom God long preserve dissolving it necessarily Fourthly Repugnant to the Act for a Triennial Parliament and to the Act for holding a Parliament once a year That the end of continuing that
of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and at the special instance and request of the Commons of the Realm our Lord the King hath caused to be ordained or ordained certain Statutes where the advising assenting to Laws is appropriated to the Lords the ordaining of them to the King and nothing but the requesting of and petitioning for them to the Commons Thus he Other Statutes saith i See his impartial inquiry into the nature of sin p. 211. See his Lex Terrae p. 26. the Reverend Doctor Peirce which have the force of Acts of Parliament are known to be directed as private Writs with a Teste Meipso And the Common stile of most others is found to run in this form The King with the advice of the Lords at the Humble Petition of the Commons Wills this or that where by the way take notice of the saying of Judge Jenkins That Consilium non preceptum Confiliarii non preceptores Counsel is not a command nor to be Counsellors is not to be Commanders So the form of passing Bills is still observed to be this Le Roy le vieult The King will have it And Soit fait il comme est desire Let it be done as t is desired plainly speaking by way of grant to something sought or petitioned for from whence saith he by some it hath bin gathered That Rogation of Laws doth rightly belong to the two Houses but the Legislation to the King that their Act is preparative his only jussive The Acts of Parliament saith the learned Mr Duncomb are called the King Laws And why not the Kings Laws Doth not he make See his Royal Buckler p. 306. 307 308. them The whole body and volumes of the Statutes proclaim the King the sole Legislator What is Magna Charta but the Kings Will and gift The very beginning of it will tell you t is no more viz. Henry by the grace of God c. Know yee that we of our meer and free will have given these Liberties In the self same stile runs Charta de forresta But wherefore evidences to prove that which no man can deny The stiles of the Statutes and Acts printed to the 1 of Henry VII are either the King willeth the King ordaineth the King provideth the King grants the King ordains at his Parliament or the King ordaineth by the advice of his Prelates and Barons and at the humble petition of the Commons c. But in Henry VII his time the stile altered and hath sithence continued thus It is ordained by the Kings Majesty and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled And why do the Lords and Commons ordain Is it not onely because the King doth It is so they do because the King doth which onely denotateth their assent for the Kings Majesty giveth life to all as the Soul to the body For did ever the Lords and Commons make an Act without the King Never They cannot The Lords advise the Commons consent but the King makes the Law Their Bills are but Inanimate scriblings until the King breaths into their Nostrils the breath of life and so that which was mould before becometh a Law which ruleth living souls And as Sir Edward Cook observeth In ancient times all Acts of Parliaments were in form of petitions which the King answered at his pleasure Now if it be the duty of the Parliament to petition and in the power of the King to receive or reject their petitions at their will Judge you who hath the supream power Thus far he § 35. By what hath been said I leave it to any understanding person to judge where the Legislative power lies whether in the Two Houses who most humbly beseech His Majesty under the notion of dutiful and loyal Subjects for making new Laws Or in the King who grants their petitions makes the Law and ordains it to be observed who both by the Law and a Sacred Oath is declared and sworn to be the onely Supream Governor of the Land That there is no difference between a Son and Servant to his Father and Master and the Two Houses to the King is clear by one oath they took wherein they swear To bear true faith and allegiance to our Sovereign Lord the King and by the other they acknowledge cutting off all pretences of Co-ordination His Majesty to be the onely Supream Governor of the Land which implies His Lordship and Dominion over them And they in all their Addresses and Declarations stile themselves His dutiful and loyal subjects and so servants and in relation to the Kings stile of Pater Patriae may be very well called sons too And seeing the Two Houses imaginary Legislative power by the Laws of this Land is not able to impower and authorize them either to make new Laws or to repeal old ones without the Royal Consent of Majesty it clearly follows That their vowing to extirpate Bishops established by Magna Charta confirmed by 32 Acts of Parliament and irrepealable was not sui Juris it lay not in their power nor had no right to do it without His Majesties consent and so having not that according to Croftons own grant the Action vowed was superseded and might very well be so by His Majesties publick Proclamation his declared pleasure against the taking or imposing of it in regard it was a traiterous and seditious Vow and Covenant and therefore null and void to all intents and purposes But further our Leaguer affirms That § 36. Their power in this Covenant was no less Legislative then in the Protestation of May 1641. What doth he Jabber thus for of non entities of things that never had a being of a Legislative power in the Two Houses which they never had which neither Divine nor English Lawes ever gave them If I should for once allow of his non-sense and lawless Assertions yet I should spoil his sport there too for their power in the Covenant was not so Legislative I speak according to the Presbyters canting tone upon these grounds The Protestation was made and taken in the presence of all the Members of both Houses and giving their free consent it was confined to established Laws had a Parliamentary authority as it were by His Majesties deep silence though nigh at hand and thereby implying His tacit consent to the doing of it many thousands took it who yet utterly damned the wretched Covenant detesting it as the venome of hell and not without just cause But when by the Midwifery of Tumults and Armies this devouring Brat of Abiram was brought forth k See Iudge Jenkins Lex Terrae p. 126. All men know That of 120 Peers of the kingdom who were Temporal Peers before the Troubles there were not above thirty left in the Lords House and in the House of Commons about 200 of the principal Gentlemen of the kingdom left the Houses and adhered to His Majesty The Covenant it self destructive to the former directly
contrary to above 30 Acts of Parliameat The King himself protesting against it as far as Oxford by his publick Proclamation as engaging the takers in Acts of high Treason Doth our Leaguer think that when 290 Voices are taken away out of 600 that the remaining part hath as great a power as when they were all together Or doth he think that the Kings silence or his Protestation doth not adde or diminish the authority of the thing sworn But I must needs say indeed l See Croftons Berith-Anti-Baal p. 51 Suppositions are sufficient supports to a man of fancy who all along this Discourse plays at Bo-peep begging what must never be granted while his Nose is between his eyes which I leave him to see at large his ignorance and folly his seditious and treasonable Principles against His Gracious Sovereign § 37. Crofton citing out of his Analepsis p. 12. That the two Houses of Parliament are Co-ordinate and Sharers in the Legislation of England and the Bishop asking p. 148. What and can they legally exercise this power without yea against the Kings consent being out of his nonage and not out of his wits This furious offspring of Smec cries out p. â—9 That they may do it without the Kings consent none do or can deny it common practice with the peoples constant obedience doth plainly manifest it as also the Protestation of May 1641. never doubted as to the validity of Authority which you say was precarious but Resolves of the House declare to have been Authoritative The Votes Resolves Orders and Ordinances of one or both Houses do proclaim it And the Priviledges of Parliament That the King can take no notice of what is debated or voted ordered or acted by them until it be by themselves formally presented unto His Majesty And the very nature of Co-ordinate power if the Doctor understands it with their Actings in case of his absence by minority or otherwise doth determine it As to the exercise of it against the Kings consent I shall conclude nothing but commend Mr. Prynn's Sovereign Power of Parliaments to your serious study And the Legislative power of their Votes Debates Resolves Orders or Ordinances were never gainsaid by His Majesty O Lump of wickedness and sedition What do or can none deny that the Two Houses may exercise that Vtopian Fiction their fancied imaginary Legislative power without the Kings consent Why is your lawless Assertion so true think you that it is past all contradiction Alas poor Presbyter why do you hug up your self so in your own delusions It s pity you should go on uncontroul'd in your wild positions and therefore I le try for once what I can say against it Are the Two Houses any better then the Kings Subjects If you say otherwise the Law affixes the deserved name of Traytor upon your forehead Can they convene and assemble together in the House without the Regal Summons Are they any more then the Kings own creature Can they stay one minute there when met together to debate or consult of any thing without His Majesties free leave Can the creature do any thing what he please without the Creators consent Suppose they should as your Long-Parliamentidol did reproach their Sovereign maintain five trayterous Antimonarchists in their treason and villany hatch a Conspiracy and bring forth Rebellion cannot the Creator have so much power over his forlorn creatures as with the breath of his mouth immediately to command their speedy departure by a dissolution Oh Crofton Crofton beware of the perjurious consequence and stop your mouth left the Ax for your treason make no difference between your own and those heads of your fellow-rebels on London-bridge But this is a Scotized Assertion an opinion of m See Bish Garden 's Anti-Baal-Berith p. 151. Seminary Presbyters who have been the Protoplasticks of a rebellious generation both in Church and State agreeable to their all along rebellious practises by vertue of their legislative power which our profound Lawyer saith they have and which they may he averrs exercise without the Kings consent and so by consequence they may rebel against their Head kill and murther His loyal Subjects imprison and impoverish others take away His Imperial Dignities and Pre-eminences from Him seize upon His Forts Ports Magazines and Towns and plague and oppress their fellow-English-men by seizing on their goods and estates how and in what proportion and maner they please send armed men through perjury to fight against their lawful Sovereign leave out the defence of his person out of their Commissions impose what cursed Leagues and Covenants they please all actions of high treason by the known Laws of this Land without His Majesties consent sell and imprison Him until He agree to their imperious humors and demands and Christen their Actions too like a pack of dissembling false hypocrites with the title of Reformation Loyalty Advancing the Glory and promoting the kingdom of Jesus Christ yea play the devil for Gods sake and all this they claim a right and lawful authority to do by force and vertue of their Idoliz'd Diana their new Goddess lately come down from Jupiter their phanatick frenzical whimsie of Legislative power And because these things have been done and justified with impudence beyond example by n See Presbytery Popish not Episcopacy p. 6. a Tumultuary Rabble that pretended to be a Parliament and their graceless adherents therefore this Leaguer concludes the Lawfulness of the Act done and the Justifiableness of re-acting the same again But A facto ad jus non valet argumentum is an old and a true Position To argue from the Action done the lawfulness thereof becomes a subtile Sophister a Trappanner and Cheater more then a sound Scholar or a Disputant As for the Two Houses Legislative power so called or their Co-ordinacy therein with their by them sworn ONELY Supream Governour I have said so much already concerning that grand delusive Cheat and Fiction that a question will now be enough against it How can the two Houses be affirmed by any having regard to the Rules and Customes of the Realm to have the whole or a Co-ordinacy or share in that which the very Prologues to the Acts and Statutes denies them to have any right or claim to either in Possession or Reversion As for the Protestation I told you before Silence gives consent and his Majesties suffering such a thing to be done by them under his nose without a Prohibition argues plainly his Tacit fiat to it but yet proves not at all their supposed Legislative power or Coordinacy in the same with their Head nor the legality of their exercise of it without the Kings consent It 's true the Bishop tells you It was precarious and personal upon this just Ground and Foundation o P. 278. That the two Houses had not power to make or take or impose any Oath contrary to the Laws of England which they were trusted to observe
the King is under none but God This saith he is that divine Sentence Quod nec Jovis ira nec ignis nec poterit ferrum nec edax abolere vetustas which neither angry Jove nor fiery Vulcan neither devouring Age nor bloody sword a worse devourer then that shall ever expunge out of our Law-books or explode out of the memory of every pious man Thus he Bracton cited by the Reverend and Learned Judge Jenkins tells us Rex non habet parem in Regno suo That the King hath not an equal in his kingdom if not an Equal then certainly no Superior and so by consequence shows the fiction of the Two Houses Supremacy There hath been so much already cited for the Supremacy of His Sacred Majesty over all persons in his Dominions by Judge Jenkins Mr. Diggs and several others that I need not trouble the Reader with any more repetitions thereof but refer the dissatisfied to their several Writings and conclude this point with a word or two concerning the Oath of Supremacy which every Member of the two Houses must take before he sits in the House or else according to Law he stands a person to all intents and purposes as if he had never bin elected or returned which clearly declares the King to be the onely Supream Governor of this Realm and of all other His Highness Dominions and Countreys as well in all Spiritual and Ecclesiastical things or causes as temporal and so certainly by undeniable consequence over the Two Houses in Parliament causes For why was the exclusive Particle Onely inserted but to cut off all pretences of co-ordinacy or share in the Regal Supremacy And truly if he be Supream there is neither Major nor Superior saith the Learned Lord Bridgeman in his Speech aforesaid Was this Oath think you Mr. Crofton composed by the Lords and Commons in Parliament in the time of Qu. Elizabeth and at their suit by * Eliz. c. 1 Act of Parliament made high Treason 5 Eliz. c. 1 for a subject to deny to take it for to be evaded and treasonably denied the subject matter thereof ascribed to the Subjects themselves who were fain to take it ere they could have the least colour or pretence perjuriously to claim or usurp it from the rightful owner and this too by such a Shadow of a Disputant as your fanciful self who have armed your self with so much confidence to bawl out these seditious Assertions which deserve nothing else but the utmost rigor of the Law for a confutation Nothing but self-condemnation No other way left you to save your credit but by writing sedition and throwing your poison'd darts of malice against your Superiors for the pretended denial of that the truth whereof your own whimsical self is found to be a real disclaimer Cannot you dig a pit for another but you must presently fall into it your self These shabbed courses of yours forces me to deal with you by a retortion and ask you once again some more of your own questions Where is Sir the Kings Prerogative over all persons in all causes What is become of the Oath of Supremacy Hath a Gracious King lately pardoned you and your Delinquent party for your former misdemeanors really to debase nay dethrone Him by your impudent and traiterous entituling his sworn Subjects with His Onely Supremacy Truly Sir I cannot blame you much now for your words in your Preface where you tell us That side 2. having animadverted this Anti-Baal-Berith i. e. the Bishops Book you finde a necessity to apologize for the very act of your Animadversion and fear nothing more then to be bound to your good behavior in misbehaving your self so much as to answer not according to what your confidence helped you to prate A fool according to his folly wherein you may seem like unto him but a learned reverend Prelate with whole mouth-fuls of sedition and rebellion wherein you are the perfect image of all the traiterous Conspirators that have been before you why else do you divide non dividenda make a division in that wherein none without perjury ought or can be make two sharers and partners in the Supremacy which the legal Oath and Statute-Laws of this Realm by which we must steer our course and not by your horrible frightful dreams declare to centre and to be the peculiar right and Sovereignty of one alone and that inseparable from his person too The goodly aim and end of all your Jabbering for the Two Houses co-ordinacy in the Supremacy is but to fulfil the Martyrs words e See Eikon Basilike in 24. P. 47. That the Majesty of the Kings of England might hereafter hang like Mahomets Tomb by a Magnetick charm between the power and priviledges of the Two Houses in an airy imagination of Regality But the Two Houses usurpation of the Supremacy it seems will not serve Mr. Croftons turn if they cannot swallow up the Legislative power too from the Royal Owner In his Analepsis * p. 12. he called them then onely Co-ordinate and Sharers in the Legislation of England now he grasps for the Suprem Legislative power alone for those long Parliament Legislative theives that made it their precious saintly work to make their strength the Law of Justice robb and pillage and murder the Subjects of their Soveraign by their cursed illegal Orders quirkes and devices and then show them the Law of their uncontroulable atheistical wills for it sic volo sic jubeo stat proratione voluntas I am perswaded the man hath a huge fancy to go higher and higher in his Seditious and treasonable language till he comes to make his last ascent at the Sacred Gallowes or else he dreams with the Fifth kingdom Rebels That notwithstanding any thing he saith or doth yet that not a hair of his head shall perish I shall not stand long upon answering him in this fiction and dream of his but shall quickly dispatch him by adding to what I have upon this point already said that which now immediately followes And therefore for that which he termes the Legislative power and because he is just like the Cuckoe repeating over and over one and the same thing to lengthen his Book Let 's hear a little what Justice Hide told the Blackening Regicide Harison at his Tryal in the Old Bayly I am sorry saith he that any man should have the face and boldness to deliver such words as you have You and all must know That the King is above the Two Houses They must propose their Laws to him The Laws are made by him and not by them by their consenting but they are His Laws That either or both Houses or any assembly or people in this or any other Nation Governed by Monarchy hath or ever claimed saith f See the Royallists defence p. 39. another in 1648. to have a Legislative power or so far to represent the Kingdom as to make new Laws and change the old without