friuolous causes and of no importaÌ„ce whose sentence neuerthelesse was confirmed and againe published by Innocent the fourth successor to the sayd Gregorie and after by Boniface the eight inserted into his sixt booke of Decretals in which place he vseth these wordes of the Scripture Quodcúnque ligaueris c. as an authoritie wherein to ground the execution of his will Bald also and Iohn Andrew very Catholicke Glozers doe confesse that in deede he seemed rather a partie then a Iudge Niâ—holas the 3. who followed soone after seeking to take the whole gouernement of the Towne from all but the Pope forbad y t neither King Duke Earle or Marquize should be established or accept the authoritie of Senator or Gouernour therein declaring that the Iurisdiction thereof belonged priuatly to the holy Sea before all other not in respect of Constantines donation but through these wordes In omnem terram exiuit sonus eorum and such other which hee interpreteth as hee thincketh good Which in effect are the very reasons whereupon Boniface the eight excommunicated King Phillip the Faire of France and gaue his Realme for a praye to the first that could seaze vpon it as we reade in his constitution in deede extrauagant in the which he exempteth neither Emperour nor King from his subiection euen in Temporall causes as he saith Also by vertue of that great power Clement the fifth disanulled the sentence giuen by the Emperour Henry the seauenth of LuxeÌ„bourg against Robert King of Sicille after hee had procured the proysoning of the same Emperour by a Muncke in ministring to him the Eucharist Which Balde confesseth to haue bene a presumpteous and wrongfull deede Finally by those Tragedies that Iohn the 22. Benedict the 12. and Clement the 6. stirred vp throughout Christiandome against the Emperour Lewes of Bauiere as also in our daies Alexander the sixt and Iulius the second did no lesse neither had any other ground We may see the causes whereby the Popes do pretend authoritie to depose Kings subuert Realmes and giue them in pray to whomsoeuer they thinke good True it is that such of them as haue most dissembled haue euer exeÌ„pted the Realm of FraÌ„ce Innocent the third writing to the Prelates and French Nobilitie for Iohn without land King of England declareth that he will enterprize nothing against the Maiestie of the French King But Hostiensis who knewe the Storie doth in this place write that the Protestation was contrary to the effect because the sayd Innocent went about to hinder King Phillip Auguste from vsing his feudall right ouer the Dutches of Normandie Guyenne and other the Lands holden by the English and falleÌ„ into the lapse through the murder committed vpon Arthur his elder brothers sonne In an other decretal Epistle the same Pope confesseth that the French King in Temporall causes and gouernment of his Realme acknowledgeth no superiour Clement the fifth in his extrauagant for appeasing King Phillip the Faire who was stirred vp by the insolencie of Boniface the eight disanulled reuoked his declarations against the Realme of France and aduowed the same not to be subiect to his Sea by vertue of the sayd constitution The same Pope also protested that the power which his Officers vsed against the said Kings subiects during his being in the Realm was by the permission of the sayd Lord King as appeareth by the protestation the same time enrouled in the Court of ParliameÌ„t for in trueth it hath euer more bene resolued and is a cace most certaine that the King of France doth vpon earth acknowledge no superiour in whatsoeuer coÌ„cerneth the pollicie gouernement of his Crowne neither was euer subiect to the Romain Empire from the which he wrested the Gaules with the point of the sworde And although the French Kings were sometimes Emperours them selues yet did they neuer submit this Crowne to the Diadem Imperiall whereupon the Kings Atorney general would not suffer the Emperour Charles the fourth beeing in the Parliament there to make a Knight without king Charles the 5. his expresse permission As also the Emperor Charles the fifth passing through Fraunce obteyned the good will of King Frances the first to pardon sundry offenders because no other then his Maiestie hath power or authoritie ouer the temporall causes of his Realm among which is vndoubtedly the punishing of transgressions yea euen of heresie of the which wee now speake the notice and Iurisdiction whereof haue euer more bene left and with good reason belongeth to the seculer Magistrate because we ought to consider the lawe of God first in this world whereto the politicke and temporall Magistrate preseruer of the societie of men and earthly policie for the auoyding of confusion and trouble forceth euery one to obeye Secondly in the worlde to come wherein God onely iudgeth and punisheth not leauing in this worlde in respect of himselfe any Magistrate to be the auenger of the iniurie to him done in y â— transgression of his ordinances For the Priestes who are the guardians and Schoolemasters of Gods lawe are not coÌ„stituted Iudges but easie Phisitions to the soule and Gods commaundements are no such Sanctions as importe punishment but most louing doctrine and admonitious otherwise if by the sworde we should be forced to the obseruing of Gods lawe the desert were small Vppon which poynt the Apostle sayd Not that wee rulee ouer your faith but are helpers to your ioye And in an other place All Scripture is inspired froÌ„ aboue and is profitable to teach to conuince to correct and to instruct to righteousnesse Hee saith not to force or to punish Chrisostome very carefully deuideth the royall power from the ministerie of the Gospell saying that the ministerie is a function committed by God to the ende to teach without weapons also that it is no power to giue or take awaye Realmes neither to make lawes for politick gouernment Our French Bishop S. Hilarie writeth as much to the Emperour Constantius also against Auxentius Bishop of Millan And this the good Fathers learned at the mouth of the Sonne of God our Lord Iesus Christ when he sayd to his Apostles The Kings of the nations haue dominion ouer them but it shall not be so with you In an other place hee promiseth them that they shall sit with the Sonne of God wheÌ„ he shal come in Maiestie to iudge mankinde but that contrariwise so long as they remaine in y e world exercizing their Ministerie they shall bee brought before Kings and politicke Magistrates for his sake so farre shall they be from being Kings and Iudges themselues The head of the Church euen Iesus Christ fled when they sought to make him King declaring y â— his Kingdome was not of this worlde wherfore he would not be iudge among those that were at controuersie yea he submitted himself to the Kings of the earth paying vnto them the tribute which was vnto
retourne to the line of Francis the Elder who maried Lady Mary of Luxembourg daughter to Sir Lewes Constable of France who brought great goods to that Famely in Picardy Artoys Flanders and other places Of these two issued diuers children namely Charles Frances Lewes Antoinet Loyse of Bourbon Charles the Eldest succeded in the Countie of Vendosme and procured it to be erected into a Dutchy and Pairry Francis had the Countie of Saint Paule and maried Lady Adriane of Touteuille daughter and heire of a great famely They had issue a daughter Lewes was a Cardinall Anthoinet was maried to the Lord of Guyze of whoÌ„ is discended the house of Guise now liuing Loise was abbesse of Fronteuault Now the said Charlâ—s the eldest maried Lady Francis of Alencon sister to the deceased sir Charles Duke of Alencon last deceased without children in the yere 1524. of this mariage issued Antonie Francis Charles Lewes Iohn Antony the Eldest and Heire of this family maried Iane of Albret Queene of Nauarre of whom came Henry of Bourbon now king of Nauarre who hath married Margaret of France Sister to the most Christian King Francis was named Lord of Anguien who gat the victory at the iorney of Serizoles died without issue Charles the third is Cardinal of Baurbon and Archbishop of Rouen Lewes was Lord Prince Conde who when he died left fower sonnes Henry Prince of Conde Francis Prince of Contie Charles Cardinall of Vendosme and Charles Countie of Soissons Iohn who after the decease of Francis was entituled Lord of Anguyen died also without Issue There were also some daughters of whom here we haue nothing to say as hauing in this argument to treate onely of the Succession of the house of FraÌ„ce which can not discend but to y â— Males of this famely The onely controuersie therefore and different that might through the Counsaile of the mischiuous be mooued resteth betweene Henry of Bourbon King of Nauarre sonne of Anthony the eldest of that famely and Charles Cardinall of Bourbon and Archbishop of Rouen his vncle by the father The end of the first part ⧠THE CONTENTS OF THE SEcond part of this Booke 1. Obiections moued against the King of Nauarre 2. The mariage betweene Lady Iane of Albret Princesse of Nauarre with the Duke of Cleue dissolued by the Ecclesiastical sentence the Popes dispensation auctorized in Parliament Also the marriage of the sayd Lady with Anthony Duke of Vendosme the eldest of the house of Bourbon from whom is discended the King of Nauarre 3. Marriage is by the Ciuill lawe voyde being contracted before age 4. The holy decrees haue inhibited the blessing of mariage of maidens before twelue yeeres of age of men before foretene the East Church haue proroged the Matrimonie of the man to fifteene and of the woman to thirteene 5. The honestie of Ciuill pollice forbiddeth mariage before age 6. Examples of mariages disanulled by reason of the noneage of the contracted 7 The explication of humaine pollicie wherefore hereticks are vncapable of successions 8. The right of Realmes is houlden immediatly of God by the continuation of the successiue lawes of the same Neither can the Estates depose a King vncapable or otherwise disabled Or the people transferre the right of their Lord vnto the person of any other to whom it ought not to be giuen 9. The office and duetie of the Clergie towarde Kings and Princes King Henry the second protested against the Counsell of Trent 10. Why those of the League would not take the Catholicke Princes of the blood therinto Those of the league haue sought to suborne those of the pretended reformed Religion 11. Kings are Stewardes of the Church goods The Church is in the Commonwealth not repugnant thereto Pollicie Iurisdiction and collation of Ecclesiasticall functions apperteineth to soueraigne Princes The Kings of Fraunce haue euermore preserued the state of the persons and goodes of the Clergie in their Crowne The Clergie were in olde tyme not capable to distribute Church goodes 12. The King neuer dyeth in France because of the successiue law thereof To what ende the Coronation of Kings was instituted The auncient maner of the Coronations of heathen Kings How long it is since anoynting was instituted and wherfore It is not necessary to annoynt or crowne Kings in one only place 13. Antiquitie is no necessary argument to auctorize common custome 14. The Church neuer disturbed the succession of Kings no not for heresie 15. Whether it be likely the K. of Na. wil force the conscience of his subiect 16. The estate of Bearne and Nauarre 17. The cause of the protestatioÌ„ that the King of Nauarre made the last yere at Montauban 18. The King cannot infringe the successiue law of the Realme The successor commeth not to the Crowne in the qualitie of heire to the deceased 19. The Popes reasons whereby he pretendeth aucthoritie to transferre Kingdomes The Popes haue euer exempted France out of their wonderfull power Gods lawe without polliticke confirmation is no sanction vpon earth Priestes haue no imperiall Iurisdiction Bishops and Popes haue acknowledged Kings and Emperors for their Lords The punishment of heretickes is executed by the seculer Magistrate 20. The opening of sundry places of Scripture concerning Ecclesiastical iurisdictioÌ„ Wicked Emperors were neuer deposed The Pope cannot excommunicate any body politick or Towne subiect to the King of France Appeales in cause of abuse from the Pope and other Clergie men obserued in France 21. The Church cannot excommunicate a Prince that is an euill liuer Subiects after the excommunication of their Lorde are not discharged of their dueties toward him 22. The sentence of the excommunication of a Prince cannot conteine any clause of depriuation from his Lordly rights 23. A Prince may lawfully arme himselfe against the Popes wrongful excommunication and appeale therefore as in abuse 24. The K. of Nauarres reason to proue him no Hereticke 25. The vsurpations of the Counsell of Trent ouer the Crowne of France 26. Most dauÌ„gerous drifts of y â— Leagued in the reformation of the Realme 27. The wicked entent of the Leagued Also what enuy they beare to the Duke of Espernon and others 28. The remembrances of Aduocate Dauid now put in execution by the Leagued The Kings duetie in matter of Religion 29. Forraine rule and gouernement is wretched FINIS THE SECOND PART OF the Cath. Apologie 1 SVch as mislike the king of Nauarres cause doe obiect against hym in this libell fonre principall points wherof three doe perticularly touche the qualitie of his owne personâ— the fourth concerneth the auncient controuersie betweene the Vncle and the sonne of the elder brother But we will endeâ—our to shewe that in all and throughout all they haue but a weake foundation Concerning the first they aleadge that the said Lorde King of Nauarre is not borne in lawfull matrimony of Anthony of Bourbon eldest sonne of the house of Bourbon because Ladie Iane of Albret mother to
Constantinople about the the tyme whereof he thereupon declared his will as is to bee gathered by the dates of the sayde Counsaile and the Emperours decree inserted into his last Code and afterwarde confirmed by sundry the nouell constitutions of the sayd Prince whereby hereticks are debarred all right of â—uccession Assuredly this obiection at the first blush beareth a great shewe but we must therein of necessitie resolue two poyntes the one of the lawe the other of the deede In the first wee are to dispute whether an heretick may be depriued of that Realme that falleth to him by succession as this doth to the King of Nauarre In the other whether in this present action the King of Nauarre may bee termed an Hereticke and as such a one bee depriued of his succession 8 For the first I saye and maintaine that those Ordenances of Emperors and Canonicall decrees which doe depriue hereticks of successions are written and speake onely of particuler Christians whose goodes and successions are subiect to the politicke lawes of the Magistrates of the land but it is otherwise in cace of Empires and Realmes which may not bee wrested out of their handes that are the true Lordes of the same either for heresie or other cause whatsoeuer because they be holden immediatly of the hand of almightie God and not of meÌ„ as it was argued and concluded in the Counsaile of Paris holden vnder Lewes the meeke Lothair his sonne Kings of France and Emperours about the yeere 829. which was ratefied vpon the saying of the Wise man Counsaile equitie wisedome knowledge are myne by me do Kings raigne and Counsailors publish their decrees in righteousnesse of me are Empires holden The like is to be read in the prophesie of Daniell The sentence is according to the decree of the watch men and according to the worde of the holy one to the ende the liuing may knowe that the most high hath power ouer the kingdome of men and giueth it to whomsoeuer he will and appointeth ouer it the most abiect among men The same Prophet soone after saith as much to Balthazar King of Babylon in representing to him the force of Nabuchodonozer the Monarke of Assiria The Prophet Ieremie in his speech of the King of Kings teacheth vs also I haue made the earth and man and beast vppon the face of the earth through my force and with my outstretched arme haue giuen it to whom it hath pleased me So that â—ubiects are not to search into their Kings neither are borne but to obey and serue whatsoeuer their Princes be without any further enquirie of their righteousnesse Feare the King and knowe that his election is of God saith the Apostle And when any of them doe commaunde or wield the Scepter royall it commeth of the fauour goodnesse and grace that God purposeth to extende to his people in graunting them a good King endued with pietie iustice and Christian Religion the others also are the scourges and roddes of his wrath and iustice whereof the Prophet Ozee saith In my wrath wil I giue thee a King And Iob Who maketh the hypocrite to raigne for the sinnes of the people for Gods wrath being kindled against vs he will sende vs a King such a one as our offences shall deserue because as it is written in the same booke of Iob If wee haue a wicked King wee are yet worse then he The place of Isidore is very fit to this purpose It is saith he a hard matter to make the Prince amend if he be giuen to vice for the people stand in awe of the Magistrate but Kings if they be not withholden by the onely feare of God and dred of the torments of hell doe abandon themselues to all libertie and runne headlong into the bottomlesse pit of sinne I say therefore that it is not for the people otherwise then with humilitie and obedience to controule the actions and qualities of their King but their duetie is onely to cast vp their eyes to heauen and to consider with themselues that by the wil of God the Scepter is fallen into his handes and power that beareth the Crowne whether he bee good or bad especially being there to called by lawful succession such as is in our France wherein by the Monarchiall lawe the people haue not onely referred al their power into the Kings hand and might but which is more haue also tyed their owne hands so as they can haue no redresse so long as any male of the bloud royall doe remaine according to the lawe of the Realme being the neerest male in agnation to the deceased after the generall custome of France yea notwithstanding he bee vnable vncapable and do want discretion to gouerne the Estate in all which causes they may only appoynt him a tutor and administrator of the publicke affayres the order wherof haue bene practized in our Fraunce vpon Charles the Simple and Charles the sixt For notwithstanding the Realme especially ours be not properly hereditary patrimoniall or fâ—udall yet it is successiue and falleth to the neerest not in qualitie of heire to the deceased but as to the next in bloud in masculin ligne so that consequeÌ„tly what euer he be he is called and whatsoeuer default be in his person either of age iudgement or what els soeuer yet may the Estates and Peeres of the Crowne do no more but appoint a tutor to gouerne him and by counsaile to supply whatsoeuer his imperfections because he was elected in heauen so soone as he came into the world All such also as shal resist him who by succession is lawfull King shall encurre the wrath and displeasure of almightie God because we are not to staÌ„d in argument or murmure against the deuine wisedome who for the afflicting of his chosen people and the house of SioÌ„ did many times suffer them to be gouerned by yong wicked franticke and vnfaithfull Kings yea meere Tyrants such as in Iuda were Roboam Ioram Ochozias Amasias Achas Ozias and others who were either Idolaters or misbeleeuers in the true God of Abraham Likewise in Israell Nadab Baaza Achab with his wife Iezabell Manasses and the most part of the rest of their Kings who raigned with more Idolatrie and tyrannie against the fauoured of God then in mans opinion was requisite With the like scourges also God hath visited his Church since y â— time of grace wherin it pleased him to send his deare sonne into the world with his most precious bloud to redeeme vs from our sinnes permitting to sit therein not onely many vnfaithful Emperours and Kings conspired enemies to our faith and heretickes but also particuler Pastors ordeyned for the feeding of the soules of Christians euill liuers and of pernicious example Constantine sonne to great Constantine Valens brother to Valentinian the first and Zeno sonne in lawe to Leo the first Emperours were Arriens Anastase and Iustinian the first of that name were
theÌ„ due together with that which was assessed vpon the heads of euery of his Apostles euermore referring the reward of his grace reuenge of trespasses against him committed vnto the kingdome of heauen enioining his Apostles to doe the like and to imitate his example as they haue done The Apostle Sainct Paule sayd Let no man that fighteth in the Lordes warfare trouble himselfe with the matters of this life Againe The minister of the Lorde ought to be louing to all men meet to teach paciently bearing with the wicked with modestie reprouing such as withstaÌ„d the trueth Briefly in one word to say all there be two kinds of Iurisdictions the one earthly coÌ„mitted into the hands of Kings and Princes to whome euery one of whatsoeuer degree or calling Spirituall or Temporall Priestes Bishops or high Priestes ought to obey as it is written Let euery soule bee subiect to the superiour powers vpon which place Chrisostome sayth the Apostle vsed this word euery to shew that there is no creature that may be exempt whether he be saith he Apostle Prophete Euangelist Priest Monk or other whosoeuer We also finde that in the Primetiue Church before pride Ambition tooke roote in the Bisshops hartes that the Popes of Rome neuer made any question thereof Wee haue also amoug vs a request exhibited by Boniface the first to Honorius Emperour of the West wherein hee beseecheth him to decree that afterwarde the Bishops and Popes of Rome might not bee chosen by fauour or any other vnlawfull meane whereto the same most Catholike Prince maketh an aunswere worthie such a request In the time of Odoacer King of the Herules who began to raigne at Rome in the yeere 471. and ruled full 14. yeres after hee had put to death Orestes and his Sonne Augustulus the last Emperour of the West vntill Charlemagne there were goodly decrees published and receiued in the Church by the Clergie vntill such tyme as Theodoricke the Wisigot whome Zeno the Emperour of the Eeast sent into Italy had ouerthrowen hym Pelagius the first made confession of his faith and sware in the hands of Ruffin the Embassadour of of Childebert King of France Pope Leo the fourth sware and protested that he would and did intend to obserue the Lawes which the Emperour Lothair the first sonne to Lewes the Meek and Neuew to Charlemagne made at Rome in the presence of Pope Eugenius the second whereof some are inserted into the Booke of Digestes the inscription whereof do import that the Emperour made them ante ianuas beati petri ad limina in atrio which was the place where the Christian Emperours were wont to make and publish their Edicts if we maye beleeue Cassiodore and others The said Emperour also created certaine Magistrates in the Towne to exercize the imperiall Iurisdiction The same Leo doth sufficiently declare what respect the high Priests of Rome did in those daies beare to the Emperours when he sued to the same Lothaire and his sonne Lewes the second to conferre the Church of Rheatine or Tusculum to one Colonus a Deacon assuring their Maiesties of his sufficiency and promising in the name of the sayde Colonus that he should praye to God for them This was the same Leo that pleaded his cause and purged himselfe of the treazon whereof hee was accused before the Emperour Lewes the seconde sonne to the sayd Lothaire as appeareth in the decree of Gratian. The like declaration did Pope Iohn the eight make to the same Emperour Lewes the second sonne to Lothaire By the decretall Epistle of Honorius the third who liued about the yeere 1216. it appeareth that as yet the remembraunce of the Emperours lawes was not vtterly abolished out of the Catholick Church and that the Priestes and high Priestes had not as yet wholy shaken of the yoke of y â— same no not in those that they terme Spirituall causes as if any question were moued of an oath in law for the decision of proces in which cace he reneweth the auncient edict of Martian and IustiniaÌ„ the first To coÌ„clude for the stopping of the mouthes of those that doe maintaine that the Pope Bishops or other of the Cleargie may establish any earthly Kingdome apart which shal not bee subiect to the Emperours and Kings of this world but rather such a one as may at pleasure commaunde and supplant the same let them dilligently search throughout the whole Scripture what authoritie the Kings and Princes of Israel had ouâ—r the Priestes and Cleargie in Gods lawe which since the tyme of grace is not deminished and there shall they euidently finde their great authoritie ouer them notwithstanding it was neuer lawfull for the Kings to execute the office of the Priestes for vndoubtedly the ministerie is one thing and the orders discipline of the Cleargie is an other and meerely temporall The other head of Iurisdiction is in heaueÌ„ which we are to looke for at the iudgement of GOD and yet not to perswade our selues that the lawe of Iesus Christ is lame or vnperfect because in it it conteineth not any punishment or earthly reuenge of trespasses against euill liuers considering that the same beeing heauenly and spirituall it will yeeld reward or punishment in the euerlasting world so that as sayd Alexander Seuerus of periury Whosoeuer offendeth against God hath God a sufficient reuenger our good God hath referred to himselfe all the punishment to the end the sinner may haue meanes to acknowledge his offence and repent the same in this world True it is that if y e earthly Magistrate hath in his pollicie taken any order for such causes then is it his office to reuenge the iniurie done to his edicts and decrees for so as saith Isidore The Kingdome of God encreaseth through the meanes of earthly Realmes to the ende such as be of the body of the Church if they offende or blaspheme may be punished by the rigor of Princes and so that discipline whereto the Church can not binde them may neuerthelesse bee preserued through the authoritie of Monarchies The like wherof haue bene vsed against heretickes by all Christian Princes especially in our France by an infinite number of lawes both olde and newe of our most Christian Kings And in troth if the Bishops or Priestes should take notice of the punishmeÌ„t of hereticks it would breede confusion of Iurisdictions and offices aswell might the Goldsmith be iudge of the golde that himselfe had wrought The Phisition of his owne cure to bee briefe euery one should pleade and decide his owne cause contrary to al reasonable order The example also of the Apostle Sainct Paule whome the Iewes accused of heresie doth sufficiently teach vs when by himself it appeareth that he was brought before Festus the Emperours Lieutenant vnto whom the accused did confesse that y â— notice of his cause did apperteine and therefore required
assignation for his accusers before the Imperiall Maiestie The Emperour Honorius appointed the Prouost Marcellus for Iudge Arbitrator betwene the Catholickes and Donatistes Dulcius also was Prouost of the Empire who at the pursuit of the Catholickes was enioyned to make vp the processe of the said Donatistes in Affricke as Sainct Augustin doth report and they required to haue them condemmed by his ordenaunces as testifieth Gratian in his decree wherein in an other place is written the opiniō of Pope Pelagius importing that it were meete that hereticks were punished by the seculer power according to which reason Sainct Austen also doth testifie that the Emperour Valentinian sent the Prouost Dalmatius vnto him to assigne him in his priuie Counsaile So as we are not to doubt but that the punishment of heretickes apperteyneth to the Princes temporall Iurisdiction who by his decrees hath limited the punishments which they may deserue 20 In deede it is the duetie of the Priestes and Bishops to know and withall to declare by the holy Scriptures together with the iudgement of the vniuersal Church who it is that hath transgressed the will of God and being a Christian hath departed or disunited himselfe from the body of the Church Those bee the true kayes of heauen which God hath put into their handes and the two Swordes that they beare whereby the Priest sheweth and poynteth out such as are soluti vel legati ab Ecclesia wherein onely consisteth his power to bind or lose in heauen as S. Hierome doth very well note in his opening of y ◠place of Sainct Mathewe which concerneth this authoritie as also the Maister of Sentences is of the same opinion neither is this power so small that the faithfull Christians should contemne it For without doubt sinne proceedeth of offence and so immediatly is brought in the bond that thereby we make to Gods enemie which vnlesse we doe reuoke we must of necessitie be driuen out of the Church and as rotten members of the same be giuen ouer to Satan Neuerthelesse he who by contrition for his sinnes and confession of the same will reclayme himselfe doth immediatly recouer three benefites repugnant to the other which are forgiuenesse of sinnes the cancelling and discharge of the Obligation made vnto the deuill and reconsiliation to the Catholicke Church wherein consisteth the true penance that the Priest or Bishop doth minister and enioine vs by vertue of his authoritie to binde or lose in heauen or in earth So as it is euident that the order of Priesthood and Ecclesiastical power hath euermore bene necessary in the Church of God to keepe teach and maintaine our soules in the knowledge of his holy will to the ende thereby to obteine his grace and fauour in the life to come For notwithstanding man was created to the Image of God and of his euerlasting Kingdome whereby he was perfect and needed no other instruction or Schoolemaister yet after his fall and the corruption of our first father he stood in great neede to bee restored to his former knowledge and the fauour of his Creator for the obteyning whereof hee was enioyned to keepe sundry precepts and very straight lawes vnder paine of deadly and euerlasting dānation vntill the tyme of grace wherein it pleased God to breake and take away the vayle and rigor of the auncient law and to forgiue our offences through the passion of his deare Sonne Iesus Christ for the enioying of the fruites whereof he hath left vs in pledge his holy Sacraments for the administrations and discipline of the which he hath cōmitted and sent his Apostles Priestes and Doctors the administrators and guardians of the same In such wise that as the ende and purpose of the Architect is the perfection and finishing of his building house so the onely end and office of the Cleargie is sufficiently to teach vs those things that appertayne to our faith and beliefe reforming our actions by admonitions and gentle perswasions that thereby together with Gods grace wee may atteyne to euerlasting saluation neither hath God giuen them any other dominion ouer vs but onely admonition and instruction in his knowledge setting before vs the reward of well doing and the reuenge of wickednesse in the vniuersall doome of the heauenly Maiestie 21 But in asmuch as the people haue not to deale therewith also that the Bishoppe of Roome in that qualitie which he pretendeth hath no such power his authoritie beeing meerely and simply Spirituall and in no poynt concerning the Realmes of the world what shal we then say if Emperours or other soueraigne Kings were as they are men and subiect to corruption hereticks or otherwise euill liuers were it not a marueilous offence to see them raigne with all power and be as scourges and persecutors of Gods Church In this question I am to desire the French to weigh the aunswer of that wise and great personage Sainct Augustin If Emperours sayth he be in error and according to their error do prescribe lawes against the trueth wherby the righteous may be tryed and crowned he aunswereth not that they must be expelled or deposed of their Empire but onely wee must not doe those things that wickedly they commaund Neither doth Sainct Ambrose finde fault with the obedience that the Christian Souldiers yeelded to the Emperour Iulian the Apostata onely he warneth them to doe nothing repugnant to the honor of God S. Peeter perswaded not the Church to depose Nero the conspired enemie of Iesus Christ but contrariwise admonished all Christians to honor and pray for him The holy Legion Fulminatory made no difficultie to go to the Warres and to venture their liues vnder the Emperour M. Antonius the Philosopher a Prince that was but a bad Christian and such a one as contrary to the pietie of Religion made a seuere Decree the markes whereof are yet to be seene in our Pandects and Eusebius Capitolinus Dion Xiphilinus and others doe make mention of the same Tertullian in his Apologeticall treatize sufficiently setteth downe the mallice of the Emperour Seuerus against the Church of the Christians and yet let vs mark what he writeth of their affection to the Prince Wee are saith he discryed vnto the Emperours Maiestie and yet were the Christians neuer proued to bee Albinians Nigrians or Cassians who were the conspirators against the Emperors M. Antonius the Philosopher Commodus Pertinax and Seuerus each after other but contrariwise those that lately tooke the oath condemned the Christians haue bene found to be the Emperours enemies neuer a Christian was there in that faction as knowing that the Imperiall Maiestie ordeyned of God must bee loued reuerenced and honored whose prosperitie as also the welfare of the whole Romaine Empire they are to desire so long as the world standeth for so long shall the same continue We doe therfore worship the Prince according as is lawfull and requisite his Maiestie
also teacheth vs that quod alicui debetur certis modis deberi desinit among which is not to bee found the excommunicatioÌ„ of him to whom we acknowledge our selues bound for otherwise the vassal and subiect should reap benefite commoditie and discharge in the destruction and hinderance of his Lorde Besides that the excommunication tendeth not in worldly matters to impouerish the partie condemned but onely to depriue and declare hym vnworthy the fellowship of men or to be thought a member of the Church of GOD. He is also denounced such a one first to be an instruction and example to all other the faithfull when they shall consider the grauitie of the offence and thereby waie the publick slaunder arising thereof Secondly to driue the condemned to call to mind abhorre and be contrite for his offence seeing hym selfe deliuered into the handes of his mortall ennemy Satan and humbly to craue reconsiliation at the catholick Church from whence he is banished in exilio sinitimo said Alexander the Martir which wee may sufficiently learne by the auncient forme of satisfaction which the Primetiue Chnrch enioyned to the parson excommunicate that is to confesse his fault before the Priests and assembly of the faithfull in whose presence hee was reproued blamed and condemned to abyde in a certaine place without the communion aud assembly of the Church with certaine outwarde workes of a penetontiary as well in habit and behauiour as especially in his dyet in which forme he should exhibit petition and supplication both to the Priestes and to the whole coÌ„gregation to be forgiuen and vnbound from his offence whervpon the Church by the aduice of the Ministers thereof sometimes condemned hym in greate amends and so by litle and litle receiued hym againe as she thought good For at the first he was onely admitted to heare the worde of God after that he was receiued to the prayers of the Church and so consequently to the Communion of the faithfull finally by the imposition of the Priestes handes he was restored to his former estate and then was it not lawfull for any to reproch vnto him what was passed So as by this forme of excommunication and penance or satisfaction extract out of the auncient Counsailes of Ancira and Nice we may euidently iudge that it no way concerned the temporall goodes as of those that the Church hath not to dispose of neither did it importe other then the exemplary correction of the excoÌ„municated for the sâ—auÌ„der by his offence committed against the Church either els according to y e holy scripture for the subduing of the flesh whereby the soule may be saued in the day of our Lord Iesus Moreouer it seemeth that Gregorie the seauenth Innocent the third and other the high Priestes did so vnderstand it wheÌ„ in the excommunication of the Lords and of those that were conuersant and had dealings with theÌ„ they would not include their officers seruants and others who by necessitie doe owe them obedience as doe the vassalles and subiects of the Crowne who naturally and ciuilly are bound to their Kings and Princes So that the necessitie of their bondage exempteth theÌ„ by the iudgement of the Church out of the generall excommunication denouÌ„ced against all other persons that haue dealing with the excommunicated And perticulerly Innocent the third in his decretall Epistle written to the Doctors of Boulogne declareth that the debtes letters and obligatioÌ„s of excommunicated persons are not called in question neither are the debtors discharged of the same much lesse to be blamed for paying and satisfying their creditors considering that the necessitie of their obligatioÌ„s doe thereto bind them And there is no doubt but the priuate famelie and household of euery one is likewise a little Commonwealth aswell as the Commonwealth is a great famelie whereof the King that ruleth it is the father and defender so elected and ordeyned by God as father of the household among the children Innocent the third therfore exepted out of the excoÌ„munication of those that were conuersant with the condemned all such persons as by necessitie of the lawes of houshold were bounde to yeelde their due obedience which shall neuer bee more strickt great or commendable in the children of the household seruants toward the father of the household then it ought to bee in the subiects towarde their King or soueraigne Prince And effectually to shewe that the excommunication of the King dischargeth not his subiects from their vowed faith let vs call to mind the auncient examples meete and commodious for this argument The Emperour Theodosius the first was iustly excommunicated for the murder of the Inhabitants of Thessalonica His sonne Arcadius for expelling and deposing S. Iohn Chrisostome from the Church of Constantinople Zeno and Anastazius for being Eutichians Lothaire the first for his adulterie committed with Gualdrade which notwithstanding their subiects were not discharged of their bondes and oathes whereby they were to them bound against the which also they neuer made any difficultie to obeye those Emperours as their lawfull Lordes Dagobert King of Fraunce who became a Nero and after the first yeres of his quiet and Catholicke gouernement began about the yeere 637. to trouble the Churches destroye the Temples banish the Cleargie and commit an infinite number of other insolencies for the which Seuerinus Bishop of Roome did greatly reprooue him was not neuerthelesse driuen awaye by his subiects who with earnest prayer obteyned at the grace of God that this Prince repented and euer after serued God faithfully all the dayes of his life When Pope Celestin the third had excommunicated Phillip Augustus King of FraÌ„ce in y â— yere 1197. for forsaking without lawfull occasion his wife Isambergue sister to King Iohn of Denmarke his States and subiects did not neuerthelesse expell him or denye to acknowledge him to be their King and Soueraigne When Boniface the eight had cast foorth his poysoned Bull against Phillip the Faire the Nobles Prelates of the Realme assembled at Paris declâ—red that the Bishop of Rome had no authoritie so to doe When Pope Iulius the 2. excommunicated and interdicted King Lewes the 12. whome iustly wee terme father of the people the Prelates and Nobilitie assembled at Tours protested it to be lawful to coÌ„temne the said Thunderbolt the same notwithstanding did sweare to him their due faith and homage When King Henry the 2. of England was by Alexander the 3. excommunicated interdicted for banishing Thomas Archbishop of Canterbury whom after his death the Pope canonized yet was he not cast out froÌ„ his kingdome neither did his subiects with earnest affection denye him their accustomed obedience Iohn without Land King of the same Ile was neuer dispossed neither did his subiects molest him in respect of the curse that Innocent the third had denounced against him in the yere 1212. vntill he became a TyraÌ„t and extreme oppressor of the people who then beeing
to beware of those things that cannot be receiued without great inconueniences Besides that the Iurisdiction and power of the Church extendeth not to temporall goodes or causes but as all men knowe Caesar shareth Empire with Iupiter neither is the Ecclesiasticall power other then Spirituall concerning the Kingdome of heauen and therefore vnprofitably and wrongfully they should thrust their Sythe into other mens haruest and without authoritie or IurisdictioÌ„ should meddle with the gouernment of maÌ„s policie and the gouernments of Realmes or earthly Empires considering the kingdome of God whereof they are Stewards and doe weare the keyes is not of this world As also of such dispensation would ensue to great iniustice because that sith the holy Church giueth remission for whatsoeuer sinne and receiueth the excommunicated after he hath made sufficient satisfaction and done penance worthy his misdeede it should come to passe that such a King or Prince notwithstanding he were reunited to the Church and had satisfied the commaundement thereof must neuerthelesse remaine banished from his estate already possessed by the first of his neighbors that shall haue receiued this rebellious people and of this trouble taken occasion to become maister thereof at whatsoeuer price from whence it would be vnpossible to auoyd him without warres and generall trouble arising of such dispensation and so should the domage done to the excommunicate King through the sentence of excommunication which was layd vpon him only for correction and admonition to coÌ„fesse his fault to aske pardon openly of GOD and his Church remaine irreparable To be briefe of extreme lawe would arise extreme iniurie whereof this poore miserable excommunicate and desperate Prince finding himselfe agrieued with the permission to his subiects to rebel would growe more obstinate in his vice for feare of losing his Crowne so in liew of vrging him to penance and satisfaction to the Church for the offence arising of his sinne he shall waxe worse and the Ecclesiasticall discipline bring forth no fruite and thereby growe into contempt And vndoubtedly therein consisteth the discretion of a Lawyer and Iudge so to make his lawes so well to order his iudgements that immediatly without difficultie how notable soeuer they be they may bee put in execution 23 Consequently a question may be propounded whether it be lawfull for a King or Prince to appeale therefro as of abuse but also by weapons to resist and withstande the execution of such a sentence because it permitteth the subiectes to shake of the yoke of his obedience refuse him the duetie of their obligation which is the same question which Lewes the 12. of Fraunce moued to the Bishops assembled in Tours in the yeere 1510. concerning the peeuish and rash excommunications layd vpon him and his confederates by Iulius the second whereto the said Bishops made aunswere that by all lawes the sayde King was permitted by whatsoeuer meanes yea euen by armes to withstand such the Popes friuolous and wrongfull declarations Which aunswere in my opinion is founded vpon all reason aswell naturall as ciuill because it is certaine and euident that the clause of the sentence of excommunicatioÌ„ of the King which conteyneth permission to the subiects to râ—bel against him is a publick force and violence that the Pope wrongfully employeth contrary to his function and authoritie and against the which the King may oppose himselfe and withstande him with the like or a greater power Secondly it ought not to be lawful for the Pope vnder pretence of a Shepheard and the care that hee should haue of the Christians to enterprize or atteÌ„pt any vnreasonable thing to the iniurie of his flocke For if the Magistrate doth any thing iniuriously either as a perticuler person either vpon confideÌ„ce of his authoritie he may be sued of iniurie Besides that wee haue before proued that the ordering Iurisdiction and notice of worldly causes and Kingdomes belongeth not to the Cleargie to whom is committed onely the publication of the spiritual and heauenly sâ—orde and so consequently sentence pronouÌ„ced by an incompetent Iudge is voyd in this head neither is any man bounde to obeye that Magistrate that hath iudged aboue his authoritie To this purpose Pope Gelasius writing to the Bishops of the East doth confesse that if the iudgement be vniust the lesse neede the condemned to care for that such a sentence cannot make the coÌ„demned guiltie before God and his Church And therfore he concludeth that he should neuer sue for absolution beeause it hurteth him not In an other place Pope Gregorie confesseth that he cannot incurre canonicall paines that is not canonically condemned In the interpretation of which place Iohn Andrew the gloser doth teach vs that it is lawfull to withstande the execution of a iudgemeÌ„t knowne to be none and giuen by such a one as hath no authoritie The same doth Celestin graunt wheÌ„ he speaketh of the election of a Bishop against the minds of the Cleargie of that Dioces where he should sit and the Glose expressely saith that the superiour abusing his power willing preteÌ„ding by force to bee obeyed it is not forbidden to withstande him especially in cace the hurt be irreparable as in this now in question because euery one naturally is permitted to withstand violence yea euen against his superiour In an other place wee learne that it is for euery one in default of the Magistrate to doe himselfe right or to bend himselfe against the wrongful oppression of an other Infinite are the examples of Emperours and Catholicke Kings who authorized by the Church haue made no difficultie to take Armes against the bishop of Rome and his adherents whensoeuer he so farre forgat his duetie as by force to enterprize that which Princes could not with reason graunt hym When Pope Iohn the eleuenth writ to the Hungarians and perswaded them to rebel against the Emperour Ottho the first and the sayd Emperor being in Italy this Pope togither with Albert Marquize of Spolete raysing warre against him the Bishops and Prelates assembled at Rome deposed the sayd Pope and hauing surrogated Leo the fifth into his roume permitted the Emperour by Warres to pursue him When Henry the blacke vnderstood that Benedict the ninth Siluester the third and Gregory the sixt Antipopes sought each to thrust other out of Italie and to establish him self by armes he went speedely to Rome with a great power to decide the coÌ„trouersie with the aduice of a CouÌ„saile assembled by his imperiall authoritie these three Popes were all deposed and disgraded and in their roume the Emperour established Suidiger Bishop of Bambergue who named him selfe Clement the second When the Emperour Henrie the fourth vnderstood that Pope Gregory the seauenth had forbidden the Bishops to require inuesâ—iture of the Emperour also that he found that y â— wicked man stirred him vp enemies yea procéeded so farre as to cause the sonne to rebell against the father against whom he opposed
from whom your predecessors the Kings of Nauarre are discended was wont viz. Pro lege grege setting forth in your actions as many desires of peace clemencie fatth honestie and Christian piette as they doe of violence bitternesse and perfidie being banded against the Iustice of God The ende of the second Booke ⧠THE CONTENTS OF THE THIRD part of this Booke 1. The grauitie of Treason For what causes a Prince of the bloud may bee declared vncapable of the Crowne Abuse of the crime of treason The malice supposition of the leagued against those of the pretended reformed religion 2. A true exposition of the crime of treason The King neuer suspected the K. of Nauarre of treason An infallible argument of the King of Nauarres pietie 3. The house of Nauarre disceÌ„ded of the house of France The Originall of the K. of Nauarres grandfathers by both father and mother 4. The Capetz and Carliens come of the same stocke as Clouis and the Merouingiens 5. The Capetz and Carliens are of one famely The originall processe and genealogie of the Capets THE THIRD PART OF the Cath. Apologie THE third obiection that the seditious doe in their Libells disperse against the K. of Nauarre importeth him to be a rebel a traitor and a protector of Conspirators against the King and therefore an ennemy to the state and common wealth wherein hee is for those causes vnworthy to commaund 1 This obiection is not so small but that being well considered as it ought the grauitie of the offence will surpasse the discourse of our sences and vnderstandings For for that onely offence came death into the world and Adam was banished Paradise Also by humaine pollicy offenders therein being thereof conuâ—et and adiudged are vnworthy all successions especially in Empires Kingdomes or other dominions although the same should fall to them by the right of natural succession as doe ours For in this cace if the neerest of the bloud Royall should be found vnthanckefull and guilty not only against the King his Lord but also against the Estate common-wealth and Maiestie of the Crowne hee and his posteritie may be attaint conuict and adiudged for euer vnworthy the succession that nature and bloud had gotten him So was it iudged by a Court of Peers of France in the yere 1457. against Iohn the second Duke of Alencon in the presence of King Charles the seauenth in the towne of Vendosme notwithstanding the sayde Sentence was afterward abolished and the iudgement made void by Letters of restitution from King Lewes the eleueÌ„th entred published and registred in the Court of Parliament the Chambers assembled by the consent of the Kings Attorney generall Wherefore I can not with silence ouer skip such an accusation against the person of the sayd Lord King of Nauarre considering also the enormitie of such a scander against the sayde Prince who neuer had his owne life so deere or in such recommendation as the seruice honor and wealth of the Maiestie of our Kings and this Crowne as being the man whome it neerest concerneth and who hath greatest interest of all worldly parsons in the preseruation of this Estate as hauing the honor to looke so neere thereto But surely by this detestable and sclanderous discourse I see the miserie and calamitie of our France wherein withiâ— these 25. yeeres during the minority of our kings the mutinous seedes of quarels haue made at their pleasures forged Articles heads of Rebellion and crimes of Treason as they haue thought good y t therein as Tacitus said of y e Empire of Tiberius might be the perfection of all accusations imitating the continuall euill doings of Princes Counsailers vnder the pretence of their Maiesties seruice For it is found y t in the tyme of the said Tiberius this crime was comprehended vnder friuilous occasions as if any man had in selling of his land sould therwith the Image of Augustus or if hee had erected his owne Picture higher then the Emperors either had employed the same in any Domesticall vsage Nero put to death Cassius one of the most excellent men of his time vnder such a pretence and because hee bare the Picture of Cassius one of the murderers of Cesar in his Armes Caracalla so farre extended this crime that eueÌ„ those were accused who had made their Vrine in any place where the picture of the Prince was erected and this licence extended so farre that it was offence to the Maiestie to beate a slaue or chaunge aparell before the picture of the Emperour either to carie the same into any shamelesse or foule place veluti si latrinae aut lupanari intulisset To be brief in those daies the crime of treazon was defined in the closet and secrete will of the Monarke or his flatterers as Iuuenall testifieth Nil horuÌ„ verbosa grandis epistola venit A Capreis bene habet nil plus interrogo The like haue bene done in our miserable Realme when the conspired enemies of the Princes of the bloud Royall did gouerne the affayres of Estate vnder Frances the second and had afterward got holde of the person of King Charles the nineth whom they nourished in wonderfull and daungerous mistrust of his subiects whereof are proceeded so many murders massacres troubles and ciuill warres which wee haue seene and too much felt to the ruine of the subiects of this poore Fraunce by reason their Maiesties haue by these firebrands beene misenformed that the King of Nauarres partakers conspired against their Estate and refused to yeeld them that obedience which by Gods commaundement they ought and in respect thereof vnder this pretence did oftentymes cause them to be proclaymed Rebelles Traytors enemies to the Commonwealth Moreouer to make this mischiefe incurable because the innocencie of this people afflicted through the wrath and indignation of their Kinges was sufficiently knowne to their fellow couÌ„trymen fellow CitizeÌ„s these spirites of Satan haue sought to entaÌ„gle theÌ„ in partialities baÌ„diÌ„g one against an other thereby to vrge theÌ„ into irrecoÌ„siliable hatred and perpetuall mistrust whereof they might neuer conceiue cause of reunion through such excesse and iniuries as the one should doe to the other during the ciuill warres also that while the same continued themselues might haue opportunitie to practize the hearts of those whom they should finde most meete to receiue the obiect of their trayterous and disloyall ambition together that by this meanes they should diminish the loue of the people to their King perswading the most passionate that the fault was in him why Fraunce had no greater peace vnder which pretence they haue spued forth and by their creatures dispersed abroade an infinite number of diffamatorie Lybelles and more then sclaunderous discourses to the preiudice of the honor and reputation of our Prince whom neuerthelesse they went about to perswade that those of the pretended reformed Religion were the authors of these deceipts But the ende of their intents
eldest sonne before whom was preferred to the Empire Lewes the Mecke second sonne to the sayd Charles But this example may most easily be aunswered because it was the same Charles their common father that had deuided his Dominions among his children and had giuen Italy to Pepin his eldest sonne which also was reserued to the sayde Bernard his sonne and therefore after the pertition made by the sayd Charles he could pretend no further in y e succession that might come in question besides that at that time the Empire was not properly successiue for notwithstanding the neerest in bloud to the deceased Emperour did succeede yet durst hee not so intitle himselfe vntill by the consent of the Romaines he had bene publickly annoynted and crowned Much lesse also was the Imperiall dignitie successiue after the creation of the Princes electors of the same in the tyme of Ottho the 3. of the house of Saxony or by the opinion of the skilfullest of our worlde in the tyme of Fredericke the 2. so as there is no likelihoode to drawe an electiue Empire into consequence with hereditarie and patrimoniall Kingdomes The 5. indgement is of the Coūtie of Arthois which was in strife in the time of Philip the Faire King of France betweene Maude wife to Ottho Earle of Bourgondie daughter to Robert Earle of Arthois slaine at the battaile of Courtray and Robert the sonne of Phillip who likewise was sonne to the sayd deceased Earle Robert in which case the aforesayde Countie of Arthois was by the sayd French King adiudged to Maud who was preferred before her neuewe Robert being yet in infancie And in troth the historie setteth downe no other perticuler occasion of this iudgement but y t it was giuen by the mere motion of the sayd King Phillip Lord of the fief Neither is it sayd that his Maiestie tooke any other aduice but of his owne will the neede that then he had of Ottho the sayd Maudes husband together with the small seruice that of long time he might attend of the said Robert a yong childe and at that tyme there needed a good warrier to be opposed against the Flemings to the ende to suppresse their boldnesse and customary rebellions So as in respect of the sayd Roberts very youth the sayd King Phillip thought it meete to infringe the law and custome vsually obserued in like causes But God be praised in whatsoeuer may happen betweene the said Lords the King of Nauarre and his Vnkle the Cardinall of Bourbon we cannot incurre that daunger but rather were to be feared the great yeeres of the sayd Lord Cardinall already olde worne and by reason of his order estraunged from al vse of armes in respect of the flouring tyme of the King of Nauarre a Prince brought vp in the same and in gonernment of Estates The sixt is for the Countie of Champagne betweene Henry the seconde sonne of Earle Thibault the daughter of the sayd Earles eldest sonne wife to Erard of Breno in which case by arrest of the Court of Parliament of the Peeres of France in the yeere 1216. the sayde Countie was adiudged to Henry the Vnckle against his neuewe daughter to his elder brother But it may easely be answered the eldest sonne of the sayde Thibault going into the holy Land had expressely ordeyned that in case he dyed in the sayd expedition or otherwise without issue male then that his brother should succeede in the sayd Countie with endowing his daughter wife to the said Breno with a competēt summe The seuenth happened betweene the children of Charles the second King of Sicil sonne to the brother of King S. Lewes who married the heire of Hūgary and of that mariage begat Charles Martel and Robert The father gaue and appointed to the sayde Martell the Realme of Hungary and in his life tyme caused him to be thereof crowned whereby he did a while enioye it and then dyed leauing his sonne Charles to whom Charles the Grandfather confirmed the donation of the sayd Realme made to his father Martell and to his second sonne Robert he gaue the Realm of Naples So that by the truth of this historie it appeareth that this was a pertition by the saide Charles the second made betweene his children which they could not resist and whereof neither y e sayd Martel nor his sonne Charles had cause to complaine for the Realme of Hungary was farre greater more rich and wealthy then that of Naples which was already rent and dismembred by the Arragōs as it is euident by al histories of those times Our Interpretors doe yet more briefly aunswere this preferment of Robert the second before the sonne of Martel his elder brother aleadging that Pope Clement the 5. pretending authoritie ouer the Realme of Naples which hee aduowed to bee of the fiefe of the Church pronounced this sentence lightly enough therein doing the office of a partie rather then of a Iudge besides that of the sayd Realme in respect it was subiect to Sainct Peters chaire was not properly successiue The last example that they alleadge is of Lewes Sforce who was preferred to the Dutchie of Milan before the sonne of Iohn Galeas but thei might rather say that he preferred himselfe by force and through execrable tyrannie which the sayd Lewes exercised against this poore orphan vnder pretence of gouerning and defending him Besides it is so farre from being our case that it is certain that the young childe enioyed his fathers Estate when this Tyrant his Vnckle seazed thereon and put him to death as vniustly as in the ende God did iustly punish him in causing him to ende his daies in miserie and captiuitie Hauing thus aunswered such examples as they may alleadge let vs now consider whether the reasons that they propounde be sufficient to cause vs to alter our aduice 8 First in all Successions it is a generall rule to call thereto the neerest to hym whose state is in question so that it is by priuiledge and extraordinarie licence that we admit the the Children of the deceased brother to share with their vnkle in such goods onely as will baare deuision Which is the cause that our Doctor alleadgeth Butr. in his Tree of the succession of the Realme of Fraunce in these words Succssit ergo illi Carolo in regno Franc. Philippus filius alterius Caroli qui erat ei in 4. gradu nec successit Robertus pronepos Roberti Comitis Atrebatensis quendam quia ille erat in 8. gradu nec successit Robertus nepos Caroli Regis Siciliae Ierusalem quia ille erat in 7. gradu nec successit Ludouicus nepos Beati Ludouici quia ille erat dicto Carolo decedenti in quarto gradu Therefore sith otherwise the Vncle retaineth still the chiefe degree the especiall regard that Iustinian had to the posteritie of the deceased brother to make them equall with their Vncles can not serue them in vndeuided